The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSLO Tank Farm Phase I ESA_10-04-22Environmental Consulting Management 1.800.322.ROUX rouxinc.com Draft Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report San Luis Obispo Tank Farm 276 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA October 4, 2022 Prepared for: Covelop Inc. 1135 Santa Rosa Street, Suite 210 San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Roux Associates, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, California 94607 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 4 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION .................................................................................................. 7 2.1 General ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Review of Readily Available Information ............................................................................. 7 2.3 Property and Surrounding Area Reconnaissance ............................................................... 7 2.4 Interview with Property Representative ............................................................................... 8 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Property Location and Description ...................................................................................... 9 3.2 Current Surrounding Property Usage .................................................................................. 9 3.3 Topographic and Geologic Setting ...................................................................................... 9 3.4 Chevron Tank Farm Summary .......................................................................................... 10 3.4.1 Chevron Tank Farm Overview ................................................................................. 10 3.4.2 Summary of Recent Environmental Conditions ....................................................... 11 3.4.3 Remedial Action Plan .............................................................................................. 12 3.4.4 Recent Remedial Activities ........................................................................................ 2 3.4.5 Planned Site Redevelopment .................................................................................... 3 Records Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 4.1 Property Land Use History ................................................................................................... 5 4.2 EDR Radius Map Report ..................................................................................................... 8 4.2.1 Target Property Listings ............................................................................................ 9 4.2.2 Off-Property Database Listings of Potential Concern.............................................. 11 4.2.3 Orphans Summary................................................................................................... 16 4.2.4 Database Listings Summary .................................................................................... 16 4.3 FOIA/Public Records Request Responses ........................................................................ 17 4.3.1 San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Department .................................. 18 4.3.2 San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department .................................. 18 4.3.3 San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District ......................................................... 18 4.3.4 City of San Luis Obispo City Clerk (including Planning and Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments) ................................................................................ 19 4.3.5 Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) online GeoTracker files ...................................................................................................... 19 4.3.6 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), including Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) and Envirostor databases .............................................. 20 4.3.7 GAMA Groundwater Information System ................................................................ 21 4.4 User Provided Documents ................................................................................................. 21 4.5 User Questionnaire ............................................................................................................ 22 4.6 Records Review Summary ................................................................................................ 22 PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE .............................................................................................. 24 5.1 Utilities ............................................................................................................................... 24 5.2 Hazardous Substances ...................................................................................................... 24 5.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls .................................................................................................. 25 5.4 Staining and Stressed Vegetation ..................................................................................... 25 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | ii 5.5 Drains and Sumps ............................................................................................................. 25 5.6 Solid Waste ........................................................................................................................ 25 5.7 Wastewater ........................................................................................................................ 25 5.8 Wells .................................................................................................................................. 25 5.9 Other .................................................................................................................................. 25 5.10 Inaccessible Areas ............................................................................................................. 25 PHASE I ESA SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 26 REPORT ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................................... 29 Tables (embedded in text) 1. Surrounding Area Uses 2. Summary of Operable Units and Preferred Remedies 3. Property History 4. EDR Listings for On-Property Listings of Potential Concern 5. EDR Listings for Facilities Within One Mile of the Property 6. EDR Listings for Facilities of Potential Environmental Concern Adjacent to or Upgradient of the Property 7. Regulatory Agencies Contacted and Responses Figures 1. Site Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. RAP Operable Units 4. RAP Parcel Completion Schedule 5. Trihydro Grading Plan Appendices A. EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck B. U.S. Geological Survey Historical Topographic Maps C. Historical Aerial Photographs D. City Directory Abstract E. Sanborn Maps F. User Questionnaire G. Regulatory Response Documents H. User-Provided Documents I. Property Photographs 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Roux Associates, Inc. (Roux) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) for 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo, California (Property). The associated Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) are 076-352-061, 076-352-062, 076-381-021, 076-382-005, 076-383-001, and 076 383-002. The Property is approximately 332 acres, divided into north and south halves by Tank Farm Road, and was formerly operated as a crude oil tank farm beginning in 1910. It was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century and was decommissioned by the late 1990s. It is the site of the former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm (SLO Tank Farm) owned by Union Oil Company of California (Union Oil). Aside from the three Chevron office buildings in the northwestern portion of the Property, the Property consists of land formerly developed as a tank farm that still has structures such as concrete lined reservoirs that formerly contained crude oil, earthen berms that surrounded now removed steel above ground crude oil tanks, underground oil piping and dirt and gravel lined pads and roads, grasslands, riparian areas, and wetlands. The surrounding area is generally used for commercial/industrial uses including the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport to the southeast along with some agricultural uses to the south. This Phase I ESA was performed in general accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13.1 on behalf of Covelop Inc. (User) and was performed to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), controlled RECs (CRECs), and/or historical RECs (HRECs) at the Property, indicating past, current, or material threats of the release of hazardous materials or petroleum hydrocarbons to the Property’s soil, groundwater, soil vapor, or surface water. This Phase I ESA was conducted by investigating past Property uses, reviewing the results of a search of environmental databases, reviewing records at relevant government agencies, and performing a reconnaissance of the Property and surrounding area. The Property is associated with a former tank farm that operated between 1910 and the 1990s and was used for the storage of crude oil. The tank farm consisted of six concrete lined earthen reservoirs ranging in capacity from 775,000 to 1,350,000 barrels 2, and 21 steel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), each with a capacity of 55,000 barrels, for a total capacity of over 6,000,000 barrels of crude oil. A 1926 lightning strike ignited a fire, which burned the reservoirs and 14 of the 21 ASTs that were present at the time and led to the burning or release of all but a few thousand barrels. After the fire, Union Oil resumed operations and reconstructed 10 ASTs and four of the reservoirs. Regional pipeline operations were also conducted at the Property, primarily in the northwest portion, with support facilities including a pumphouse, boilers, and equipment houses. Database listings indicate additional leaks and ruptures of pipelines on the Property during the operational years. The tank farm was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. Other historical uses include the operation of a fire training school in the northwest portion of the Property, and the operation of a recycling facility between the early 1990s and 2000 on the northern portion of the Property. The fire training operations were suspended in the 1970s, and ASTs were decommissioned between the 1950s and 2000. 1 Note that ASTM International recently approved and published E1527-21, an update to E1527-13 Phase I ESA standard that the EPA has not yet recognized as compliant with AAI. EPA’s review and approval are expected within the next 12 months. Given that, this assessment was completed in accordance with E1527-13 and incorporated additional procedures and refinements set forth in E1527-21. 2 One barrel of oil is 42 gallons. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 2 Current contamination on the Property is primarily related to petroleum impacts, with crude oil found in soil as deep as 60 feet bgs. Oil has been reportedly encountered on the surface, with expressions ranging from asphalt-like coke to viscous liquid. Characterization efforts have found that petroleum in the subsurface is effectively immobile, and the migration of dissolved-phase constituents is controlled by biodegradation. Petroleum hydrocarbons have also been detected in surface water and wetlands on the Property. Petroleum impacts are also present in groundwater and there are soil gas impacts that include the presence of elevated benzene and methane. Most recently, a Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) evaluation took place on the Property in October 2021, as detailed in the January 21, 2022 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sampling Results Investigation Report by Arcadis. This report stated that the Tank Farm’s historical fire training area (FTA) ceased operations in the 1970s, and it is unknown if PFAS-containing materials such as aqueous firefighting foam (AFFF) were used at the Property. Concentrations of various PFAS compounds were detected in all wells and water sources sampled, with the highest concentrations detected along the southeastern boundary of the Property. Investigation is currently ongoing to characterize the source and extent of PFAS contamination. Plans for remediation, restoration, and redevelopment were outlined in the User-provided documents, particularly the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Final Remedial Action Plan (RAP) and Supplemental RAP, and the Users preliminary plans to redevelop the Property. The regulation and cleanup at the Property is overseen by the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The remediation and restoration plan consists of several activities to be performed: demolition of remaining buildings and portions of the earthen reservoirs, excavation of soil, site grading, capping of impacted soil to create a barrier between potential receptors, and increasing the quantity of wetland and plant habitat. Excavation and other remedial actions are expected to impact approximately 43 acres of waters/wetland on the Property, which will be subsequently restored during the restoration phase. The remediation and restoration activities described in the RAP are currently ongoing at the Property with some areas completed and others in progress or still planned. The final remediation and restoration activities are expected to be completed by 2030. The User is investigating the possible redevelopment of portions of the Property as remediation and restoration is completed. The goal for the Property is to develop within the same development area as outlined in the 2013 certified "Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final Environmental Report", with residential, commercial, business park and industrial uses in addition to right-of-way. The remaining area of the Property, primarily on the southern portion and the western half of the northern portion, will remain as open space. The development would be phased over a multi-year period. The following REC was identified at the Property: Historic Use and Operation of Former Unocal Tank Farm: The Property was operational as a tank farm between 1910 and the 1990s. Over the history of the tank farm, crude oil was stored in six large earthen reservoirs and 21 ASTs, which sustained significant damage during a 1926 fire and resulted in the release of approximately 200 million gallons of oil onto the Property. Additional releases caused by pipeline ruptures have been documented throughout the Property history as well. Groundwater sampling conducted since 1998 has indicated residual levels of petroleum and VOC contamination on the Property in soil and groundwater. The plume has been characterized as relatively stable, unlikely to migrate offsite, and is currently being addressed by remedial activities outlined in the 2015 Final Remedial Action Plan. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 3 No HRECs, CRECs or de minimis conditions were identified at the Property. Business environmental risks (BERs) are conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate agencies; however, these conditions may have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of the Property. The following BERs were identified for the Property: Recent investigations have found elevated levels of PFAS compounds in groundwater on the Property, particularly on the southeast border. PFAS compounds are not currently classified as a hazardous substance under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), nor are there currently any federal or California promulgated concentration limits in groundwater or drinking water, but there likely will be future regulation of PFAS compounds in groundwater. Consequently, the presence of PFAS compounds in groundwater at the Property is considered a BER. Data Gap Review: the ASTM Standard requires that the report identify any obvious uses of the Property since 1940 or first developed, whichever is earliest and significant data gaps which affect the ability of the environmental professional to identify recognized environmental conditions. Historical Property use and ownership are well documented from 1939 to current use. Based on this information, no significant data gaps in historical records have been identified for the Property. As of the date of this report, a final response has not been received from the San Luis Obispo County Fire Department and Local Oversight Program. However, given the other sources of information available for this review, this data gap is not deemed significant. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 4 INTRODUCTION Roux Associates, Inc. (Roux) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the Property, located at 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo, California (Property). The associated Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) are 076-352-061, 076-352-062, 076-381-021, 076-382-005, 076-383-001, and 076-383-002. This Phase I ESA was performed on behalf of Covelop, Inc. (User), the prospective purchaser of the Property, in anticipation of future acquisition and redevelopment of the Property. The Property totals approximately 332 acres, divided into north and south halves by Tank Farm Road, and was formerly operated as a tank farm beginning in 1910. It was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. It has been historically operated and is currently owned by Union Oil, which is whole-owned by Chevron. Aside from the current Chevron office building in the northwestern portion of the Property, the Property consists of land formerly developed as a tank farm that still has structures such as concrete lined reservoirs that formerly contained crude oil, earthen berms that surrounded now removed steel above ground crude oil tanks, underground oil piping and dirt and gravel lined pads and roads, grasslands, riparian areas, and wetlands. The surrounding area is generally used for commercial/industrial uses including the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport to the southeast. This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with the scope of work presented in the proposal submitted to User on March 29, 2022 (authorized on March 30, 2022) and in general accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials’ (ASTM) International Standard Practice E1527-13.3 (Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments), consistent with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Rule (40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries; Final Rule).4 The preamble for the AAI Rule states: In today's final rule, EPA is referencing the standards and practices developed by ASTM International and known as Standard E1527-05 (entitled “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process'') and recognizing the E1527-05 standard as consistent with today's final rule. The Agency determined that this voluntary consensus standard is consistent with today's final rule and is compliant with the statutory criteria for all appropriate inquiries. Persons conducting all appropriate inquiries may use the procedures included in the ASTM E1527-05 standard to comply with today's final rule.5 This AAI Rule was subsequently amended in 2013, as indicated in the following “Background”: With today's action, EPA is establishing that parties seeking liability relief under CERCLA's landowner liability protections, as well as recipients of brownfields grants for conducting site assessments, will be considered to have met the standards and practices for all appropriate inquiries, as set forth in the Brownfields Amendments to CERCLA and 40 CFR Part 312, if such parties follow the procedures provided in the ASTM E1527-13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.” EPA 3 Note that ASTM International recently approved and published E1527-21, an update to E1527-13 Phase I ESA standard that the EPA has not yet recognized as compliant with AAI. EPA’s review and approval are expected within the next 12 months. Given that, this assessment was completed in accordance with E1527-13 and incorporated additional procedures and refinements set forth in E1527-21. 4 Final Rule and information available at www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/regneg.htm#final_rule, and https://federalregister.gov/a/2013- 31112. 5 Federal Register: November 1, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 210), page 66081. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 5 made this determination based upon the Agency's finding that the ASTM E1527-13 standard is compliant with the All Appropriate Inquiries Rule. Therefore, parties conducting all appropriate inquiries may use the procedures in the newly issued ASTM E1527-13 standard when conducting all appropriate inquiries.6 The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible, Recognized Environmental Conditions RECs) in connection with the Property. ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 defines RECs as: the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions. ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 provides that identified RECs can be evaluated and classified into Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) or Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) based on the following definitions. ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 defines a CREC as: a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 defines a HREC as: a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). In order to assess the potential for RECs associated with the Property, Roux utilized a variety of information sources to perform the Phase I ESA, including a radial information search from federal, state, and local regulatory agency databases as well as readily available information from the following sources: Property representative, historical aerial photographs, historical topographic maps, historical Sanborn fire insurance maps, and city directories. Additionally, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)/public records requests were submitted to federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. The historical research and questionnaire were conducted for the purpose of developing an understanding of the following: Current and past use of the Property; Current and past use of hazardous substances and/or petroleum at the Property, if any; Waste management and disposal practices that might have potentially caused releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products at the Property; Current and past corrective actions and response activities are undertaken to address past and ongoing releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products at the Property, if any; 6 Federal Register: December 30, 2013 (Volume 78, Number 250). 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 6 The existence of any engineering and/or institutional controls recorded for the Property; and, Current and past uses of adjoining properties that could have resulted in releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products to the Property. Roux’s Principal Geologist David Dixon and Senior Geologist Michael Friedman served as the Environmental Professionals who conducted the Phase I ESA. Mr. Dixon and Mr. Friedman possess sufficient specific education, training, and experience to exercise professional judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases, as defined in 40 CFR §312.1(c) on, at, in, or to the Property, sufficient to meet the objectives and performance factors in 40 CFR §312.20(e) and (f). 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 7 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION The methods of investigation used to conduct this Phase I ESA are outlined in the following sections. 2.1 General The activities performed in conjunction with the Phase I ESA of the Property include: Review of federal, state, and local environmental regulatory agency databases provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. of Milford, Connecticut (EDR), indicating locations of environmental concern within specified radii from the Property; Submission of FOIA requests/public requests and inquiries to federal, state, and local regulatory agencies; Review of available historical sources including, as available, historic topographic maps, historical aerial photographs, and a City Directory Abstract; Site reconnaissance; Review of environmental documents readily available for the Property and select nearby sites; Interview with key site representatives; and, Submission of a User questionnaire. 2.2 Review of Readily Available Information The resources compiled and reviewed by Roux to-date include the following: EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck, dated April 5, 2022 (Appendix A); EDR United States Geological Survey Historical Topographic Maps: Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, Arroyo Grande 15-minute, San Luis Obispo 15-minute, and San Luis 30- minute, dated 1897, 1900, 1916, 1918, 1942, 1948, 1952, 1965, 1976, 1978, 1979, 1994, 1995, 1998, 2012, 2015, and 2018 (Appendix B); EDR aerial photographs dated 1939, 1949, 1956, 1960, 1963, 1976, 1981, 1994, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016 (Appendix C); EDR City Directory Abstract, dated April 6, 2022 (Appendix D). EDR Sanborn Report dated April 5, 2022 (Appendix E); User-provided questionnaire (Appendix F); Public record request response documents from the public agencies listed in Table 5 in Section 4.3 Appendix G); and, A photographic log from the Property reconnaissance (Appendix H). 2.3 Property and Surrounding Area Reconnaissance Pursuant to ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, Roux conducted reconnaissance of the Property on April 20, 2022 to identify, investigate, and assess potential RECs and other potential environmental concerns. Reconnaissance included observation of the Property to determine the current use and condition of the Property, and indications of past uses of the Property. During the Property reconnaissance, Roux placed particular emphasis on identifying the following features, if present, in accordance with ASTM E1527-13: Hazardous substances and petroleum products in connection with identified uses; Storage tanks; Odors; 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 8 Pools of liquid; Drums; Hazardous substances and petroleum products containers; Unidentified substance containers; Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); Heating and cooling systems; Stains or corrosion; Drains and sumps; Pits, ponds, or lagoons; Stained soil or pavement; Stressed vegetation; Solid waste; Wastewater; Wells; and, Septic systems. In addition, Roux observed the general topographic setting of the Property and adjacent properties. Photographs from the Property reconnaissance are presented in Appendix H. 2.4 Interview with Property Representative Roux interviewed Ms. Tulledge, a representative of Chevron, which wholly owns Union Oil Company of California, the current Property owner, during the Site reconnaissance. Ms. Tulledge confirmed that the RAP and other associated plans for habitat restoration are being implemented on an ongoing basis. She confirmed that the onsite building and office trailers are only used for office, training and storage purposes. When asked if Chevron has received RWQCB approval for their 2020 Completion report for OU4 and Reservoir 4, she said they had not, which indicates that the RWQCB online Geotracker files are likely up to date. Information obtained from this interview is referenced throughout this Phase I ESA, where applicable. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 9 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Descriptions of the Property and surrounding areas are included in the following sections. Figure 1 presents the location of the Property in the general context of the City of San Luis Obispo and Figure 2 shows the current Property configuration. 3.1 Property Location and Description The Property is located at 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo, California (Property). The associated Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) are 076-352-061, 076-352-062, 076-381-021, 076-382- 005, 076-383-001, and 076-383-002. The Property consists of fourteen parcels totaling approximately 332 acres, divided into north and south halves by Tank Farm Road, and was formerly operated as a tank farm beginning in 1910. It was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. It has been historically operated and is currently owned by Union Oil. Aside from the three current Chevron office buildings in the northwestern portion of the Property, the Property consists of land formerly developed as a tank farm that still has structures such as concrete lined reservoirs that formerly contained crude oil, earthen berms that surrounded now removed steel above ground crude oil tanks, underground oil piping and dirt and gravel lined pads and roads. The surrounding area is generally used for commercial/industrial purposes. 3.2 Current Surrounding Property Usage The Property is located in a majority industrial area. Table 1 lists the surrounding area uses. Table 1. Surrounding Area Uses North North of the Property are several vacant parcels and industrial and commercial properties. Approximately 0.25 miles north of the Property is a residential neighborhood. East Directly east of the Property are various industrial/commercial properties, beyond which is a residential neighborhood. The San Luis Obispo Regional Airport is located southeast adjacent to the Property. West Directly west of the Property are various industrial/commercial properties, beyond which is a residential neighborhood. South Directly south of the Property are several lots that appear to be either vacant or used for agricultural purposes. Minimal development exists on these parcels. 3.3 Topographic and Geologic Setting According to the EDR Radius Map Report (Appendix A), historical topographic maps (Appendix B), and Google Earth, the Property elevation is approximately 130 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The Property has a gentle slope upwards to the northeast. The Property is within the Lower San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed.7 The nearest surface water bodies 8 are a small unnamed creek that flows along the southern border of the Property, and San Luis Obispo Creek, 7 US EPA, How’s My Waterway https://mywaterway.epa.gov/community/276%20Tank%20Farm%20Rd,%20San%20Luis%20Obispo,%20CA,%2093401,%20USA/ov erview) 8 US Fish and Wildlife Wetlands Mapper (https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html). 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 10 which flows toward the south approximately 0.8 miles west of the Property. The Property is located within the San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin 9. Groundwater bearing units are mostly characterized by Pleistocene to Holocene age terrestrial deposits.10 Based on information from the 2022 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sampling Results Investigation Report for the Property by Arcadis,11 the depth to groundwater in monitoring wells on the property has been reported from 9.3 to 21.7 ft below ground surface bgs). Groundwater flow in the Property vicinity is reported to be to the west-southwest with a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.007 ft/ft, based on the 2022 report. According to the 2007 Feasibility Study by Avocet Environmental, Inc. 12, the shallow subsurface at the Property down to approximately 20 feet generally consists of silt and lean clays with moderate to high plasticity. Below 20 feet bgs, the subsurface consists of primarily fine-grained silty sand and poorly to well- graded sands and gravel. 3.4 Chevron Tank Farm Summary The Property is known to have been previously operated by Unocal (formerly Union Oil) as a tank farm beginning in 1910, when it was constructed to serve as a storage facility and accumulation point for a petroleum pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. It was slowly withdrawn from operation during the 1980s, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. It has been historically operated by Unocal, which was purchased by Chevron in 2005 13. Unocal remains a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chevron. The Property has had a significant history of industrial activities in addition to the Tank Farm that have affected its environmental condition and resulted in widespread impacts to soil and groundwater on the Property. The regulation and cleanup at the Property is overseen by the RWQCB. Groundwater in the Site vicinity, which is known to flow in a west-southwest direction, has been impacted by VOCs, PFAS, and petroleum, particularly crude oil. Chevron intends to remediate the existing contamination such that the Property is suitable to be redeveloped for alternatives uses, including commercial and recreational space. The following sections are intended to provide a brief overview of the history, operations, environmental impacts, and future redevelopment plans for the Property. 3.4.1 Chevron Tank Farm Overview From 1910 until the 1980s, the Property was used for the storage of crude oil transported by pipeline. Storage facilities consisted of six earthen reservoirs ranging in capacity from 775,000 to 1,350,000 barrels 14, and 21 steel ASTs, each with a capacity of 55,000 barrels. The reservoirs consisted of excavated circular depressions, which were lined with reinforced concrete. Between the reservoirs and ASTs, the Property had a total capacity of over 6 million barrels of petroleum. On April 7, 1926, lightning strikes ignited the vapors in four of the reservoirs and led to a fire at the Property. Despite fire suppression efforts, the fire from the initial lightning strikes spread to the other reservoirs and to 14 of the existing ASTs. Crude oil flowed out of the reservoirs and tanks and on to the surrounding ground. Over the four days after the lighting strike, all but a few thousand of the six million barrels of inventory had 9 California Department of Water Resources Groundwater Basin Boundary Assessment Tool (https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bbat/) 10 California’s Groundwater Bulletin 118 (2004). San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin. 11 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sampling Results Investigation Report, dated January 21, 2022, via Chevron Tank Farm GeoTracker profile (https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=SL203011375). 12 Feasibility Study, dated March 15, 2007, via Chevron Tank Farm GeoTracker profile 13 Avocet Environmental, Inc. Final Remedial Action Plan, Section 1.0. (Avocet, 2015). 14 One barrel is equivalent to 42 gallons. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 11 been released and spread across the Property. Much of this oil burnt to petroleum coke, which is a black solid residue usually obtained from cracking (burning) in the refining process. To date, highly weathered and burned petroleum covers the ground in area of the Tank Farm, particularly in topographically low points. After the fire, Union Oil resumed operations and reconstructed 10 ASTs and four of the reservoirs. Reconstruction included adding additional fire breaks and containment areas around the reservoirs. In addition to the storage of petroleum, pipeline operations were also conducted at the Property, primarily in the northwest portion, with support facilities including a pumphouse, boilers, and equipment houses. A series of pipelines was present for oil movement to and from the Property, as well as between storage facilities on the Property. During operations, arsenic-based herbicides were used for weed control, primarily in the northwest area of the Property. Other historical uses of the Property include the operation of a fire training school in the northwest portion, which consisted of sumps and tanks for practicing fire extinguishing techniques. The fire training school operations were suspended in the 1970s. A recycling facility was also operated by SLOCO Recycles between the early 1990s and 2000 on the northern portion of the Property. The area was used as a transfer station for recyclable materials including paper, glass, and aluminum. In addition, the northeast portion of the Property was formerly used as a quarry mine. Gravel and rock from this mine will be used as a source of backfill during remediation and redevelopment activities. The four reconstructed reservoirs continued to be used for several decades, before being decommissioned between 1959 and 1976. The petroleum and walls were removed from the reservoirs, but the reinforced concrete bottoms were left in place. The concrete floors of two reservoirs, Reservoirs 5 and 7, were ripped using a bulldozer shank in an attempt to prevent water from accumulating. The reservoirs were then partially backfilled with between 5 and 10 feet of non-engineered backfill. The origin of this backfill is not currently identified. The remaining ASTs were decommissioned between the 1950s and 2000. 3.4.2 Summary of Recent Environmental Conditions Currently, aside from the Chevron office buildings in the northwest portion of the Property, the Property consists of land formerly developed as a tank farm that still has structures such as concrete lined reservoirs that formerly contained crude oil, earthen berms that surrounded now removed steel above ground crude oil tanks, underground oil piping and dirt and gravel lined pads and roads, grasslands, riparian areas, and wetlands. Cattle grazing is conducted on the open space in order to prevent fires and control weeds. Land uses in the area consist of industrial and commercial development, agricultural land, scattered residential areas, and the SLO Airport adjacent to the southeast. Significant site characterization efforts have been undertaken at the Property to understand the nature and extent of impacts due to historical operations. Sampling efforts since approximately 1998 have identified that current contamination on the Property is primarily related to petroleum impacts, with crude oil found in soil as deep as 60 feet bgs. Oil has also been reportedly encountered on the surface, with expressions ranging from asphalt-like coke to viscous liquid. Characterization efforts have found that petroleum in the subsurface is effectively immobile, and the migration of dissolved-phase constituents is controlled by biodegradation. This monitored natural attenuation is verified by semi-annual monitoring of groundwater wells. A Risk Management Summary was prepared in 2005 to identify the primary areas of contamination at the Property for which remediation is required. The principal impacts identified included surface petroleum impacting wetlands at several of the former reservoirs, plastic surface petroleum found across the Property, groundwater affected by benzene and light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL), arsenic in soil, asphalt impacting wetlands, and the potential of benzene, methane, and hydrogen sulfide vapor intrusion into current 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 12 and future buildings. Based on the Risk Management Summary, Avocet conducted a 2007 Feasibility Study 15 to evaluate various remedial alternatives, which informed Avocet’s 2015 Final Remedial Action Plan, discussed below. Most recently, a PFAS evaluation took place on the Property in October 2021, as detailed in the January 21, 2022 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sampling Results Investigation Report by Arcadis. This report stated that the Tank Farm’s historical FTA in the northwest portion of the Site ceased operations in the 1970s, and it is unknown if PFAS-containing materials such as AFFF were used at the Property. Concentrations of various PFAS compounds were detected in all wells and water sources sampled, with the highest concentrations detected along the southeastern boundary of the Property. This report concluded that the historical FTA was likely not a source of PFAS, but that PFAS compounds are present in the groundwater beneath the Property. Investigation is currently ongoing to characterize the source and extent of PFAS contamination. 3.4.3 Remedial Action Plan The Remedial Action Plan provides an overview of the preferred remedial alternatives identified in the Feasibility Study, and outlines the planned implementation. The plan for the Property consists of two main phases: a remediation and restoration component, and a development component. The remediation and restoration component consists of several activities, including demolition of remaining buildings and portions of the earthen reservoirs, excavation of impacted soil, site grading, soil capping, and increasing the quantity of wetland and plant habitat. The petroleum material impacting the Property is found at an average depth of 25 to 40 feet, but as deep as 60 feet. At the surface, crude oil expressions include solid coke to a low-density LNAPL. Excavation and other remedial actions are expected to impact approximately 43 acres of waters/wetland on the Property, which will be subsequently restored during the restoration phase. Five operable units (OUs) were developed for the Property (four terrestrial areas and site-wide groundwater), and remedial alternatives were identified for each. General institutional and engineering controls were outlined as well, including use restrictions for land and groundwater, and vapor barriers installed for any new building. Table 2 provides a summary of the OUs, Areas of Concern (AOCs), preferred remedies, and the preferred controls. A figure showing the locations of the OUs and AOCs was prepared by Avocet and is included as Figure 3. The areas and remedial alternatives for each OU are detailed below. 15 Avocet Environmental, Inc. Feasibility Study – Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. (Avocet, 2007). 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 1 Table 2. Summary of Operable Units and Preferred Remedies Operable Unit (OU) Area of Concern (AOC) Preferred Remedy Proposed Institutional and Engineering Controls OU #1 - Northwest Operations Area AOC #1 - LNAPL/BTEX- Impacted Groundwater Natural Attenuation + ICs + LTM Vapor Barriers Groundwater Use Restrictions AOC #2 - Surface Soils Capping + ICs + ECs + LTM Vapor Barriers Use Restrictions Notice of Subsurface Chemicals of Concern Groundwater Use Restrictions OU #2 - Reservoirs 5 & 7 - Capping + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions OU #3 - Reservoir 4 - Capping/Excavation + ICs + ECs + LTM Vapor Barriers Use Restrictions Notice of Subsurface Chemicals of Concern OU #4 - Remaining Site- Wide Surface and Subsurface Soils AOC #1 - North Marsh Area Excavation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions AOC #2 - Reservoir 3 Capping + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions AOC #3 - PPSH Areas Excavation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions AOC #4 - Arsenic Excavation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions OU #5 - Site-Wide Groundwater - Natural Attenuation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions Groundwater Use Restrictions Notes: BTEX = benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes ICs = institutional controls LNAPL = light nonaqueous-phase liquid LTM = long-term monitoring PPSH = pliable plastic surface hydrocarbon Source for this table is the Remedial Action Plan 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 1 OU #1 encompasses groundwater and soil in the northwest operations area, where the Chevron office buildings are currently located. OU #1 includes two Areas of Concern (AOC): #1 is groundwater and #2 is soil. Groundwater is impacted by light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPLs) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds. Because of its higher toxicity, benzene poses the greatest exposure risk to future users of the site. Dissolved benzene in groundwater is noted as migrating off-site near well SLOW-12 but, according to the RAP, it “rapidly attenuates and does not appear to threaten downgradient water wells.” The LNAPL in groundwater is considered “stable and unrecoverable” and there is no evidence of impacts to downgradient groundwater beneficial uses. The remedial action objective for AOC #1 is to prevent human contact with TPH- or benzene-impacted groundwater and ensure that groundwater resources downgradient of existing impacts are not affected. The preferred remedial alternative is monitoring natural attenuation with institutional controls (ICs), engineering controls (ECs), and long-term monitoring. The extent of long term monitoring will depend on post-remediation sampling results and groundwater improvement over time. Shallow soil (less than 2 feet bgs) is impacted by arsenic contamination, which is widespread, and to a lesser extent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Deeper soil is impacted by the LNAPL present in the saturated zone. The RAOs for AOC #2 are to prevent human and eco-receptor contact with arsenic, TPH, PAHs, and volatile hydrocarbons. The preferred remedial alternative includes construction of the 4-foot thick soil cap on top of geotextile, removal of arsenic contaminated soil in a limited area and consolidate it under the cap, ICs, ECs, and long-term monitoring and maintenance. OU #2 encompasses two of the former earthen reservoirs (5 and 7), for a total area of 9.8 acres, which are designated as open space in all land use plans. Both reservoirs contain wetlands and rare plant communities. The bottoms of each reservoir are reinforced concrete that has been ripped to promote drainage; however, the bottoms are covered with 1 to 2 feet of tar, non-engineered fill, and construction debris. The reservoirs are impacted by surface expressions of liquid-type hydrocarbons that are hydraulically connected to the subsurface and extend to 25 feet bgs. The selected remedy involves the implementation of a cap over the reservoirs, ICs, and long-term monitoring and maintenance. The cap construction consists of removing surface material to expose the concrete bottoms of the reservoirs and then placing 1.5 feet of gravel that will be covered with geotextile and a combination of earthen fill and topsoil. The cap surface will be graded to encourage runoff. OU #3 encompasses the eastern development area on the northeast portion of the Property, which is zoned for future commercial development and encompasses former reservoir 4 and several surface expressions of hydrocarbons. At the time of the RAP the floor of Reservoir 4 was covered with 5 to 6 feet of non-engineered, hydrocarbon impacted soil and construction debris. Weathered, high-molecular weight TPH-impacted soil extends to depths of 50 feet below Reservoir 4. The preferred remedial alternative consists of ICs and removing petroleum-impacted fill material covering the former reservoir and replacing it with a soil cap approximately 4 to 11 feet thick over a geotextile layer. Long-term monitoring will also be implemented. The area in the proposed development area will include construction of a 4-foot thick cap, or confirmation that the top 4-feet meet the OU #4 encompasses the remaining terrestrial and waters/wetland areas of the Property not included in the first three OUs and includes an area of approximately 270 acres which is zoned as primarily open space. Three AOCs were identified as the North March Complex, former Reservoir 3, Pliable surface expressions of hydrocarbons, and arsenic-impacted shallow soil. At the time of the RAP, Reservoir 3 was covered with surface expressions of hydrocarbons resulting from settlement of soil within the reservoir and the subsequent extrusion of the viscous oil. Reservoir is filled with 8 to 11 feet of non-engineered fill including berm soil, construction debris, and tar. Preferred remedies for these areas consist of excavation, construction of a soil 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 2 cap, and replanting with native wetland plants. Surface petroleum was planned to be excavated and removed site-wide as well. OU #5 encompasses site-wide groundwater, excluding the northwest operations area, which is included in OU #1. It was determined that there is no evidence of offsite migration, and that dissolved hydrocarbons are being attenuated by natural processes. As such, the preferred alternative for OU #5 is monitored natural attenuation and semiannual groundwater sampling. Implementation of the remedial and restoration activities began in 2015, and completion is expected in approximately 2030. A schedule of planned activities by OU and parcel was prepared by Avocet and is included as Figure 4. The RAP includes a requirement to collect post-remediation soil gas samples in the planned development areas and, based on results, land use covenants and required engineering controls will be established for specific parcels in conjunction with the RWQCB. 3.4.4 Recent Remedial Activities In 2020, remedial activities were completed for OU #3 and OU #4, and were detailed in Trihydro Corporation’s 2020 Closure Summary Report, North Property Soils – OU #3 and OU #4 16 and Trihydro’s 2019 Annual Summary Report – Remediation and Restoration Activities 17. Trihydro’s grading plan schedule with planned work areas is presented as Figure 5. As discussed, OU #3 encompasses the planned redevelopment area on the northeast side of the Property, containing former Reservoir 4. In 2017, work performed in this area consisted of: Additional TPH-containing soil investigation and delineation in former Reservoir 4 and surrounding areas of concern; Pipeline removals; Excavation and off-hauling of TPH-contaminated soils in Reservoir 4 and the surrounding area; Excavation and onsite storage of clean soils excavated above the concrete floor of former Reservoir 4; Replacement and re-compaction of clean excavated soils above the former Reservoir 4 concrete floor; and Placement and compaction of clean soil to meet grading requirements within the former Reservoir 4 and surrounding area, as detailed in the RAP. Work conducted in OU #4 was primarily located in the North Marsh, which consists of water and wetlands east of the Northwest Operations Area. This area formerly contained approximately seven acres of two to three feet thick petroleum surface expressions, which were excavated between 2017 and 2019. Work performed between 2017 and 2019 in OU #4 consisted of: Additional soil characterization; Excavation of petroleum hydrocarbons; Lead- and PCB-impacted soil delineation, excavation, and removal; 16 Trihydro Corporation. Closure Summary Report – North Property Soils – OU #3 and OU #4. Trihydro, 2020. 17 Trihydro Corporation. 2019 Annual Summary Report – Remediation and Restoration Activities. 2020. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 3 Remediation and/or abatement of asphaltic materials, crude oil, TPH-contaminated soil, and asbestos-containing materials; Excavation and removal of all associated pipelines; and Restoration of impacted wetlands. Trihydro stated in their 2020 Closure Report that remedial requirements for these work areas have been fulfilled, and verification sample results have shown that contamination in the work areas has been reduced to the required levels to meet human health and environmental standards. Trihydro’s grading plan schedule, shown as Figure 5, outlines the approximate schedule of work through 2024. The most recent remedial activities completed in 2021 were detailed by inspection records received from the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District. Since the completion of OU #3 and the North Marsh area with OU #4, work has begun at Reservoir 3, an area of concern within OU #4. Work performed has included the excavation of backfill material from borrow areas and backfilling of the cap within Reservoir 3, as well as environmental monitoring and geologic clearance activities. As of the May 27, 2022, the RWQCB had not approved the 2020 Closure Report or documented acceptance or commented on the remedial activities conducted in 2021. 3.4.5 Planned Site Redevelopment Once remediation and restoration are completed, the Property is slated to be redeveloped. The FEIR was performed in 2013 which proposed areas for conservation, open space and development. The past redevelopment plans have been revised by the User as described below. 2013 Proposed Redevelopment While Chevron is responsible for the remediation phase, the redevelopment phase will be regulated by either the County or City, depending on whether the Property is annexed into the City. Marine Research Specialists’ 2013 Final Environmental Impact Report18 details the City and County potential plans for redevelopment and provides an environmental analysis for each. Both the County and City development plans share the goal for the Property of developing the northeast portion of the Property, approximately 17 percent of the total area, for business park, commercial uses, and recreational space. This would include approximately 800,000 square feet of business park and commercial uses, and the designation of approximately 15 acres for recreation uses to be subsequently developed. The remaining area of the Property, primarily on the southern portion, will remain as open space. Development would be implemented in five phases over a period of approximately 25 years. In addition to the plans for development of the northeast portion of the Property, improvements and modifications would be made to existing roadways in the Property area, and new roads would be constructed. Site grading would be completed during the remediation phase, and would be the most intensive period of activity, with significant disruption of soil. After the completion of grading, the construction of commercial, industrial, retail, and recreational structures would begin. The primary difference between the City and County development plans is the plans for water use and treatment. The County plan proposes more rapid early development of the eastern end of the Property, south of Tank Farm Road, where one acre of land would be used to construct an on-Property wastewater treatment 18 Marine Research Specialists. Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final Environmental Impact Report. 2015. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 4 facility. This would include on-Property wells to provide water and sewer service for the new development. Under the City plan, the Property would be annexed into the City and served by extending existing water and wastewater service utilities. 2022 Proposed Redevelopment The revised redevelopment plan by the User maintains the same physical areas and acreage proposed for redevelopment but changes some areas of usage and square footage of development. Covelop’s redevelopment plans propose redeveloping in the northeast portion and will include 725 multifamily attached units, 69,150 square feet of retail mixed use space, 279,700 square feet of professional and medical office uses, 209,000 square feet of industrial and warehouse space, and 237,200 square feet of mixed service commercial uses. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 5 Records Review 4.1 Property Land Use History The land use history of the Property was prepared by reviewing topographic maps, historical aerial photographs, and city directories. Historical research documentation is provided in Appendices B, C, D, and E. Based on the available sources, the following chronology of the Property was developed (Table 2). Table 2 lists the history of the Property and of the regional area surrounding the Property. Table 3. Property History Source Year Status Topographic Map 1897 The Property is shown to be undeveloped, with a creek flowing across the Property from northeast to southeast. Multiple railroads are present to the east and west. The nearest road is approximately 0.1 miles east of the Property. Topographic Map 1900 The 1900 topographic map appears largely consistent with the 1897 topographic map. Topographic Map 1916,1918 The 1916/1918 topographic map appears largely consistent with the 1900 topographic map. Aerial Photograph 1939 Six earthen reservoirs are visible on the Property – five on the southern portion and one on the northern portion, each with an area of approximately four to five acres. Two of the reservoirs on the southern portion appear to contain petroleum. 10 aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) appear to be present on the northern portion of the Property, and 11 former tank locations are visible, for a total of 21 AST locations. Several small buildings are present on the northwestern portion of the Property in the vicinity of the ASTs. Topographic Map 1942 Six earthen reservoirs are present on the Property, consistent with the 1939 aerial photograph. Nine ASTs are depicted on the northern portion of the Property. Clark Field Airport is depicted adjacent to the Property to the north. The creek that formerly bisected the Property has been rerouted to the south of the Property. Several new highways have been constructed in the vicinity of the Property. Topographic Map 1948 The Property is unmapped on the 1948 topographic map. The area to the north of the Property appears largely consistent with the 1942 topographic map. Aerial Photograph 1949 One of the earthen reservoirs appears to have been partially emptied; the other appears to remain full. The San Luis Obispo airport is visible to the southeast of the Property. The 1949 aerial photograph appears otherwise consistent with the 1939 aerial photograph. Topographic Map 1952 10 ASTs are now present on the northern portion of the Property, consistent with the 1949 aerial photograph. A network of levees is present surrounding each of the earthen reservoirs and ASTs. The San Luis Obispo Airport has been constructed southeast of the Property. Aerial Photograph 1956 All earthen reservoirs appear to be drained of petroleum. Minor 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 6 Table 3. Property History Source Year Status development has taken place on parcels in the vicinity of the Property. Aerial Photograph 1960 Two of the six earthen reservoirs appear to have been partially refilled with petroleum. The 1960 aerial photograph appears otherwise consistent with the 1956 aerial photograph. Aerial Photograph 1963 Additional development has taken place on parcels in the vicinity of the Property. The 1963 aerial photograph appears otherwise consistent with the 1960 aerial photograph. Topographic Map 1965 Nine ASTs are depicted on the northern portion of the Property, and a pumping station is labeled adjacent to the ASTs. Two of the reservoirs are depicted as containing petroleum, consistent with the 1960 aerial photograph. Additional development has taken place in the Property vicinity. Aerial Photograph 1976 One of the ASTs has been removed, leaving nine remaining, consistent with the 1965 topographic map. The earthen reservoirs appear to be all drained. New developments, appearing to be residential and industrial, have been constructed to the west and northwest of the Property. Topographic Map 1976,1978 The 1976/1978 topographic map appears largely consistent with the 1965 topographic map, with the exception of several new developments. City Directory 1977 The 1977 city directory does not list a tenant at the Property. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: Union Oil Co Northern at 180 Tank Farm Road San Luis Ready Mix Concrete at 219 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road Topographic Map 1979 The Property is unmapped on the 1979 topographic map. The area to the north of the Property appears largely consistent with the 1976/1978 topographic map. Aerial Photograph 1981 Additional industrial development has occurred in the Property vicinity. The Property appears consistent with the 1976 aerial photograph. City Directory 1981 The 1981 city directory does not list a tenant at the Property. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: SLO Auto Salvage at 180 Tank Farm Road San Luis Truck Service at 219 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road City Directory 1985 The 1985 city directory lists the tenant at 276 Tank Farm Road as Guy Atkinson Construction. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: San Luis Truck Service at 219 Tank Farm Road Diamond Magnetics at 245 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road City Directory 1992 The 1992 city directory lists the tenant at 276 Tank Farm Road as Unocal Corporation and the tenant at 325 Tank Farm Road as San Luis Obispo County Recycles. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: San Luis Truck Service at 219 Tank Farm Road Duvals Automotive at 245 Tank Farm Road 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 7 Table 3. Property History Source Year Status San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road Topographic Map 1994 Additional industrial and residential development has occurred in the Property vicinity. The Property appears consistent with the 1976/1978 topographic map. Aerial Photograph 1994 Eight of the ASTs have been removed, leaving one AST remaining. A small building has been constructed on the northern portion of the Property along Tank Farm Road. Additional industrial and residential development has occurred in the Property vicinity. City Directory 1995 The 1995 city directory lists the tenant at 276 Tank Farm Road as Unocal Corporation. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: San Luis Ready Mix at 219 Tank Farm Road Duvals Automotive at 245 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road Topographic Map 1995,1998 The 1995/1998 topographic map appears largely consistent with the 1994 topographic map. City Directory 2000 The 2000 city directory does not list a tenant at the Property. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: San Luis Truck Service at 219 Tank Farm Road Grizzle Construction at 245 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road City Directory 2005 The 2005 city directory does not list a tenant at the Property. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: San Luis Truck Service at 219 Tank Farm Road Grizzle Construction at 245 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road Aerial Photograph 2006 The final AST has been removed from the Property. Additional development has occurred adjacent to the Property, and the San Luis Obispo airport appears to be undergoing expansion. Aerial Photograph 2009 The San Luis Obispo Airport has been further expanded; portions of it are adjacent to the Property boundary. Additional development has occurred adjacent to the Property. City Directory 2010 The 2010 city directory does not list a tenant at the Property. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: Union Asphalt at 219 Tank Farm Road Grizzle Construction at 245 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road Aerial Photograph 2012 The 2012 aerial photograph is consistent with the 2009 aerial photograph. Topographic Map 2012 The ASTs are no longer depicted on the Property. Two of the reservoirs are shown remaining on the Property. Building details are no longer shown, but the Property vicinity appears consistent with the 1995/1998 topographic map. City Directory 2014 The 2014 city directory lists the tenant at 276 Tank Farm Road as Chevron. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: Union Asphalt at 219 Tank Farm Road Grizzle Construction at 245 Tank Farm Road 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 8 Table 3. Property History Source Year Status San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road Topographic Map 2015 The 2015 topographic map appears largely consistent with the 2012 topographic map. Aerial Photograph 2016 The 2016 aerial photograph appears consistent with the 2012 aerial photograph. City Directory 2017 The 2017 city directory lists the tenant at 276 Tank Farm Road as Chevron. City directory listings for the surrounding area include: Union Asphalt at 219 Tank Farm Road San Luis Auto Glass at 245 Tank Farm Road San Luis Paper Co at 625 Tank Farm Road A summary of the Property’s history, including these records, is provided in Section 4.7 and Section 6. 4.2 EDR Radius Map Report Roux used a computerized environmental database and radius map report prepared by EDR to conduct a government records database search of sites of potential environmental concern within a maximum search radius of a one-mile of the Property in conformance with the ASTM Standard for Phase I ESAs. EDR conducted the search of environmental databases on April 5, 2022. Appendix A contains a complete copy of the EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck® and a description of the databases. Table 3 is a summary of the search results of all databases that EDR indicated include records within one mile of the Site. Table 4. EDR Listings for Facilities Within One Mile of the Property Database Target Property 1/8 mile 1/8 - 1/4 mile 1/4 - 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile Total AST 0 2 8 NR NR 10 CA FID UST 0 0 2 NR NR 2 CERS 4 5 NR NR NR 9 CERS HAZ WASTE 0 15 14 NR NR 29 CERS TANKS 0 1 3 NR NR 4 CHMIRS 6 0 NR NR NR 6 CIWQS 2 3 NR NR NR 5 CORTESE 0 2 2 3 NR 7 CPS-SLIC 2 2 4 2 NR 10 CUPA LISTINGS 1 31 49 NR NR 81 DEED 1 0 0 0 NR 1 ECHO 1 7 NR NR NR 8 EDR HIST AUTO 1 0 NR NR NR 1 EMI 2 1 NR NR NR 3 ENVIROSTOR 0 0 4 3 6 13 ERNS 7 0 NR NR NR 7 FINDS 2 9 NR NR NR 11 HAZNET 2 4 NR NR NR 6 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 9 Table 4. EDR Listings for Facilities Within One Mile of the Property Database Target Property 1/8 mile 1/8 - 1/4 mile 1/4 - 1/2 mile 1/2 - 1 mile Total HIST CORTESE 0 2 1 1 NR 4 HIST UST 0 3 6 NR NR 9 HWP 0 0 0 1 0 1 HWTS 2 NR NR NR NR 2 LUST 0 2 3 4 NR 9 MINES 0 1 0 NR NR 1 MINES MRDS 0 1 NR NR NR 1 NOTIFY 65 0 0 0 0 1 1 NPDES 1 1 NR NR NR 2 PFAS 0 5 4 4 NR 13 RCRA NONGEN/NLR 0 23 31 NR NR 54 RCRA-LQG 0 1 0 NR NR 1 RCRA-SQG 1 2 10 NR NR 13 RCRS-VSQG 0 0 1 NR NR 1 RESPONSE 0 0 0 0 1 1 RGA LUST 1 0 NR NR NR 1 SWEEPS UST 0 0 2 NR NR 2 SWF/LF 0 0 2 0 NR 2 US MINES 0 0 1 NR NR 1 UST 0 0 3 NR NR 3 WDR 0 1 NR NR NR 1 WDS 0 1 NR NR NR 1 Total 36 126 149 18 8 337 The EDR report incorrectly noted one Envirostor Database site located within ¼ mile of the Property: SAES Puregas facility located at 4175 Santa Fe Rd at 55 ft east and adjacent to the Property. This facility was confirmed to be the same as the Entegris Inc facility listed with the same address and located 869 feet east and cross gradient of the Property. Table 4 was corrected to include the SAES Puregas facility in the 1/8 to mile from the Property grouping. 4.2.1 Target Property Listings Listings for the Target Property in the EDR Radius Report were as follows: Standard Environmental Records: These databases are those required for review under the ASTM Standard for a Phase I ESA. The Target Property was identified in the following databases of Standard Environmental Records: RCRA-SQG, ERNS, CPS-SLIC. Additional Environmental Records: Databases of Additional Environmental Records typically contain reasonably ascertainable information that is supplemental to the review required under the ASTM Standard. The Target Property was identified in the following databases of Additional Environmental Records: DEED, CHMIRS, FINDS, ECHO, CUPA LISTINGS, EMI, HAZNET, NPDES, CIWQS, CERS, HWTS. EDR Historical Records: The property was listed in the following EDR Historical Records database: EDR HIST AUTO. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 10 These listings are discussed further in Table 4 below. Additional discussion of environmental investigation activities at the Property and in the Property vicinity is included Sections 4.4 and 4.5. Table 5. EDR Listings for On-Property Listings of Potential Environmental Concern Property Listing(s) Database Listing(s) CHEVRON SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM FORMER UNOCAL / UNION OIL) CERS, RCRA-SQG, CHMIRS, EDR HIST AUTO, ERNS, CPS-SLIC, CUPA LISTINGS, NPDES, CIWQS, ERNS, HWTS, DEED, HAZNET, EMI, RGA LUST, FINDS, ECHO, MINES MRDS, PFAS SLOCO RECYCLES HWTS, HAZNET, CIWQS The following provides a summary of the potential significance of the listings in Table 4. Evaluation of On-Property Listings This section presents an evaluation of all EDR database entries for the Property, and whether any listings are indicative of a potential release that may significantly impact the Property. Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm (Former Unocal / Union Oil): This facility is listed under the CERS, RCRA-SQG, CHMIRS, EDR HIST AUTO, ERNS, CPS-SLIC, CUPA LISTINGS, NPDES, CIWQS, ERNS, HWTS, DEED, HAZNET, EMI, RGA LUST, FINDS, ECHO, MINES MRDS, and PFAS databases. The Property is associated with a former tank farm that operated between 1910 and the late 1990s. In 1926, lightning-induced fire caused several aboveground earthen crude oil holding tanks to rupture and spill approximately 200 million gallons of crude oil onto the ground. Groundwater monitoring conducted since 1998 has indicated that a small, localized plume containing benzene and petroleum hydrocarbons exists immediately downgradient of the former office area in the northwest corner of the Property. This plume appears to be stable, and natural attenuation is occurring on the leading edge on the northwest side of the Property. Petroleum hydrocarbons have also been detected in surface water and wetlands on the Property. Multiple incidents are reported in the EDR listings, including a 1994 spill of crude oil from a punctured pipe, a 2008 spill of approximately 130 gallons of contaminated water with trace amounts of hydrocarbons, a 2012 release of 2 ounces of hydraulic oil from an excavator, and multiple unspecified releases of oil and detections of contaminated soil. It is unknown if PFAS compounds were used on the site for firefighting operations, but several wells on the Property have reported detections of PFAS compounds in exceedance of regulatory drinking water response levels with the highest concentrations detected along the southeastern boundary of the Property as further discussed in Section 4.3.5. The history of petroleum releases dating back to the 1910s represents an environmental concern for the Property. The Property is currently undergoing remediation for remaining petroleum hydrocarbon and VOC contamination in soil and groundwater. This listing is discussed further in Section 4.3.5. SLOCO Recycles: This facility is listed under the HWTS, HAZNET, and CIWQS databases. It is associated with a former transfer station and recycling facility that was active on the northern portion of the Property between at least 1994 and 2000. Waste materials listed include oil-containing waste, organics, oil/water 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 11 separation sludge, alkaline solution, and paint sludge. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. 4.2.2 Off-Property Database Listings of Potential Concern For this review, database listings that are down-groundwater gradient, beyond the ASTM-standard search radius, or have database listings that do not indicate a release to the subsurface are not considered to represent potential RECs for the Property. Sites that have achieved regulatory closure are also considered to be of low concern, though information available for upgradient sites adjacent to or within 1/8 mile of the Property with closed regulatory cases have been reviewed for significance. Therefore, off-Property facilities that have database listings that meet the criteria presented below are considered for further review in this report: Adjacent facilities: facilities located immediately adjacent to the Property were reviewed due to their close proximity to the Property and the potential for surface water discharges (e.g., stormwater runoff, surface water effluent discharges) to enter the Property or through the migration of groundwater or soil vapor. Upgradient facilities: Facilities located potentially hydraulically upgradient of (or if groundwater gradient is unknown, topographically higher than) the Property. As discussed in Section 3.3, records indicate that groundwater likely flows predominantly to the west-southwest in the vicinity of the Property. As such, facilities within the review radii designated within the ASTM Phase I standard and located to the east-northeast of and topographically higher than the Property are reviewed as having a potential impact on subsurface conditions at the Property. Facilities with listings indicative of a release: for upgradient or adjacent facilities, the review is focused on database listings at off-site facilities that may be indicative of a release that could impact the Property. Facilities with records in databases where listings are only for regular site operations, with no evidence of release, are not by themselves considered to represent potential RECs for the Property. (For example, listings in a database of hazardous waste manifests, or of hazardous materials use.) The following databases contain such records. If no release has specifically been reported in another database, then the presence of a facility with listings only in these following databases is assumed not to represent a potential REC for the Property, and listings for those facilities are not included for further review in this Section: FINDS ECHO EMI HAZNET RCRA-SQG RCRA-LQG CERS The following Table 5 provides a summary of EDR Radius Report database listings that meet all review criteria: 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 12 Table 6: EDR Listings for Facilities of Potential Environmental Concern; Adjacent to or upgradient of the Property Address Distance/ Orientation to Property Property Listing(s) Database Listing(s) 271 TANK FARM RD 0 ft W ADJ DYER'S DIESEL RCRA NONGEN / NLR, HWTS, HAZNET, FINDS, ECHO, CUPA LISTINGS, WDR, CIWQS 273 TANK FARM RD #B 0 ft W ADJ COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, CERS, FINDS, ECHO, RCRA NONGEN / NLR 275 TANK FARM RD 0 ft W ADJ CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCE INC RCRA NONGEN / NLR, FINDS, ECHO, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, CERS 277 TANK FARM RD 0 ft W ADJ FINISHMASTER BRANCH # 420 RCRA NONGEN / NLR, CUPA LISTINGS, FINDS, ECHO 277 TANK FARM RD 0 ft W ADJ D'ANGELOS & SONS INC HWTS, HAZNET 281 TANK FARM RD. 0 ft W ADJ SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTO SALVAGE FINDS, ECHO, RCRA NONGEN / NLR, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, EMI, NPDES, WDS, CIWQS, CERS, HWTS, HAZNET 269 TANK FARM ROAD 23 ft W ADJ JEFFERIS AUTO BODY CERS HAZ WASTE, FINDS, CUPA LISTINGS, EMI, CERS 4149 SANTA FE ST #8 54 ft E ADJ AM PAC REPAIR CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, RCRA NONGEN NLR 4155 SANTA FE RD 55 ft E ADJ LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACILITY LUST, CORTESE, HIST CORTESE, CERS 4130 HORIZON LN #D 84 ft W ADJ KEN'S BODY SHOP CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS, RCRA NONGEN / NLR, CUPA LISTINGS 4130 HORIZON LN #B 84 ft W ADJ SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICE CUPA LISTINGS 4130 HORIZON C 84 ft W ADJ JEFFERIS AUTO BODY HWTS, CUPA LISTINGS, HAZNET 4115 SANTA FE ROAD 98 ft E ADJ SPYGLASS ASSOCIATES HIST UST 4120 HORIZON LN #A 109 ft W ADJ CLOUD COMPANY, INC CUPA LISTINGS 4110 HORIZON LN # F 170 ft W ADJ INK SPOT RCRA NONGEN / NLR 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 13 Table 6: EDR Listings for Facilities of Potential Environmental Concern; Adjacent to or upgradient of the Property Address Distance/ Orientation to Property Property Listing(s) Database Listing(s) 635 TANK FARM RD 324 ft E UNITED RENTALS INC 560 / ZUPAN'S EQUIPMENT RENTAL RCRA NONGEN / NLR, HWTS, CORTESE, LUST, AST, CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS, CUPA LISTINGS, HIST CORTESE, CERS 645 TANK FARM RD STE L 515 ft E ACME AUTOBODY RCRA NONGEN / NLR, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS 645 TANK FARM RD. SUITE G 515 ft E SLO SAIL AND CANVAS RCRA NONGEN / NLR 645 TANK FARM #F 515 ft E STAR AUTOMOTIVE CUPA LISTINGS 660 TANK FARM RD. 590 ft E NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLC RCRA NONGEN / NLR BEHIND 650 TANK FARM RD. 620 ft E BOX KITE BARN YARD,INC. RCRA NONGEN / NLR 648 CLARION CT 654 ft E SNIDER PRECISION, INC. RCRA NONGEN / NLR 645 CLARION CT 660 ft E SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC RCRA NONGEN / NLR, HWTS, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, HAZNET, CERS The EDR report noted a SAES Puregas facility located at 4175 Santa Fe Rd at 55 ft east and adjacent to the Property but this facility was confirmed to be the same as the Entegris Inc facility listed with the same address and located 869 feet east and cross gradient of the Property. The SAES Puregas facility appears on the EDR Report but was not included in Table 5 based on the actual distance from the Property. The following provides a summary of the potential significance of the listings in Table 5. Evaluation of Immediately Adjacent Off-Property Listings This section presents an evaluation of all EDR database entries for sites that are immediately adjacent to the Property, and whether any listings are indicative of a potential release that may significantly impact the Property. Dyer’s Diesel at 271 Tank Farm Road (0 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR, HWTS, HAZNET, FINDS, ECHO, CUPA LISTINGS, WDR, and CIWQS databases. It is listed in NAICS as a general automotive repair facility. It reportedly generated less than one per year ton of oil-containing waste, organics, and hydrocarbons solvents between 2015 and 2017, which were transported offsite for treatment or disposal. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 14 Complete Automotive at 273 Tank Farm Road (0 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, CERS, FINDS, ECHO, and RCRA NONGEN / NLR databases. It has an active listing the CUPA program and is listed in NAICS as a general automotive repair facility. It reportedly generated less than one ton per year of hydrocarbon solvents and organic solutions between 2010 and 2018, which were transported offsite for treatment or disposal. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. CCM Offroad & Performance Inc at 275 Tank Farm Road (0 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR, FINDS, ECHO, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, and CERS databases. It is listed in NAICS as a waste management service, and is reported as a generator of unspecified hazardous waste. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Finishmaster Branch #420 at 277 Tank Farm Road (0 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR, CUPA LISTINGS, FINDS, and ECHO databases. It has an inactive CUPA listing and was formerly listed as a generator of hazardous waste. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. D’Angelos & Sons Inc at 277 Tank Farm Road (0 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the HWTS and HAZNET databases. It disposed of less than one ton per year of unspecified solvents, latex waste, paint sludge, and organics between 2011 and 2017, which was transported offsite for treatment or disposal. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. San Luis Obispo Auto Salvage at 281 Tank Farm Road (0 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the FINDS, ECHO, RCRA NONGEN / NLR, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, EMI, NPDES, WDS, CIWQS, CERS, HWTS, and HAZNET databases. It is reported in CUPA as an active generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams. It disposed of less than one ton per year of organics and oil containing waste between 2003 and 2010, which was transported offsite for treatment or disposal. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Jefferis Auto Body at 269 Tank Farm Road (23 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the CERS HAZ WASTE, FINDS, CUPA LISTINGS, EMI, and CERS databases. It is currently inactive, and formerly was reported as a generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. AM PAC Repair at 4149 Santa Fe Road (54 feet east adjacent): This facility is listed in the CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, and RCRA NONGEN / NLR databases. It is listed in NAIC as a general automotive repair facility. It is listed as active in CUPA, and is reported as a generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams. While this facility has received violations for improper planning or documentation, none of the violations appear to be related to a release that may have migrated off-site. Therefore, it is not expected that this facility represents a significant concern for the Property. Laidlaw Transit Facility at 4155 Santa Fe Road (55 feet east adjacent): This facility is listed in the LUST, CORTESE, HIST CORTESE, and CERS databases. It is associated with a closed LUST case regarding a spill of diesel to groundwater, which was in 1993. Based on the length of time for which this case has been closed, it is not expected that this facility will represent an environmental concern for the Property. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 15 Ken’s Body Shop at 4130 Horizon Lane (84 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS, RCRA NONGEN / NLR, and CUPA LISTINGS databases. It is listed in NAICS as an automotive repair facility, and is reported in CUPA as an active generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. San Luis Ambulance Service at 4130 Horizon Lane (84 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the CUPA LISTINGS database. This facility is listed as inactive in CUPA, and formerly was reported as a generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Jefferis Auto Body at 4130 Horizon Lane (84 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the HWTS, CUPA LISTINGS, and HAZNET databases. It formerly disposed of less than one ton per year of oxygenated solvents in 1994 and 1995, and is currently listed as inactive. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Spyglass Associates at 4115 Santa Fe Road (98 feet east adjacent): This facility is listed in the HIST UST database. It reportedly had three USTs in 1981: a 7,500-gallon waste oil tank, a 7,500- gallon diesel tank, and a 7,500-gallon gasoline tank. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Cloud Company, Inc at 4120 Horizon Lane (109 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the CUPA LISTINGS database. This facility is listed as inactive in CUPA, and formerly was reported as a generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Ink Spot at 4110 Horizon Lane (170 feet west adjacent): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR database. It was verified as not a generator of hazardous waste in 2002. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Evaluation of Other Off-Property Listings This section presents an evaluation of EDR database entries for facilities that are not immediately adjacent to the Property that meet the review criteria and are indicative of a potential release, and a review of whether they likely significantly impact the Property. Zupan’s Equipment Rental at 635 Tank Farm Road (324 feet east): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR, HWTS, CORTESE, LUST, AST, CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS, CUPA LISTINGS, HIST CORTESE, and CERS databases. It also operated as United Rentals. The facility is associated with a closed LUST case regarding a spill of gasoline that was discovered in 1991. The site was closed in 1992, and no further information was available. Given the regulatory status of the facility and length of time it has been closed, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Acme Autobody at 645 Tank Farm Road (515 feet east): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR, CERS HAZ WASTE, and CUPA LISTINGS databases. It has an active CUPA listing, and is reported as a generator of unspecified hazardous waste. The facility has no cited 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 16 violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. SLO Sail and Canvas at 645 Tank Farm Road (515 feet east): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR database. It was verified as not a generator of hazardous waste in 2020. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Star Automotive at 645 Tank Farm Road (515 feet east): This facility is listed in the CUPA LISTINGS database. It is currently inactive, and formerly was reported as a generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Nick Tompkins at 660 Tank Farm Road (590 feet east): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR database. It was verified as not a generator of hazardous waste in 2020. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Box Kite Barn Yard, Inc at 650 Tank Farm Road (620 feet east): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR database. It was verified as not a generator of hazardous waste in 2018. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Snider Precision, Inc. at 648 Clarion Court (654 feet east): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR database. It was verified as not a generator of hazardous waste in 2001. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. Specialty Construction, Inc. at 645 Clarion Court (660 feet east): This facility is listed in the RCRA NONGEN / NLR, HWTS, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA LISTINGS, HAZNET, and CERS databases. It has an active listing in CUPA, and was reported as a generator of hazardous waste with between one and five waste streams, including organics, latex waste, and oil containing waste. The facility has no cited violations or known releases. Therefore, it is not expected that this listing represents an environmental concern for the Property. 4.2.3 Orphans Summary Three “orphan” records were identified in the EDR Radius Report that had addresses that did not allow EDR to automatically map the database entries. Review of the orphan records does not appear to indicate that the orphan listings are for facilities in close proximity to the Property. 4.2.4 Database Listings Summary Based on the evaluation criteria and the supplemental review, there are two database listings indicative of facilities of potential concern within the ASTM search radius. The Property is associated with the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, which was operational between 1910 and the 1990s. In 1926, lightning-induced fire caused several aboveground earthen crude oil holding tanks to rupture and spill approximately 200 million gallons of crude oil onto the ground. Groundwater monitoring conducted since 1998 has indicated that a small, localized plume containing benzene and petroleum hydrocarbons exists immediately downgradient of the former office area in the northwest corner of the Property. This plume appears to be stable, and natural attenuation is occurring on the leading edge on the northwest side of the Property. Petroleum 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 17 hydrocarbons have also been detected in surface water and wetlands on the Property. It is unknown if PFAS compounds were used on the site for firefighting operations, but several wells on the Property have reported detections of PFAS compounds in exceedance of regulatory drinking water response levels with the highest concentrations detected along the southeastern boundary of the Property. Remediation is currently in progress, and due to the residual petroleum and VOC contamination, it is considered as a potential environmental concern for the Property. More information and assessment related to these facilities are included in Sections 4.3.5 and 4.3.6. 4.3 FOIA/Public Records Request Responses Public Records Act (Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA) requests for the Property were submitted to federal, state, and local regulatory agencies and the requests and responses are summarized in Table 5 below. Table 7. Regulatory Agencies Contacted and Responses Agency Status San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Department (SLO DEH) Records requested on April 4, 2022. Response was received on April 8, 2022 with an inventory of records for the Property. San Luis Obispo County Fire Department Records requested on April 4, 2022. As of the date of this report, no response had been received. San Luis Obispo County Local Oversight Program Records requested on April 4, 2022. As of the date of this report, no response had been received. San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Records requested on April 4, 2022. Response was received on April 13, 2022 with records for the Property. San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District Records requested on April 4, 2022. Response was received on April 19, 2022 with records for the Property. City of San Luis Obispo City Clerk including Planning and Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments) Records requested on April 4, 2022. Response was received on April 8, 2022 stating that all digitized records could be found on the City’s online portal. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), including Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) and Envirostor databases Records requested on April 4, 2022. Confirmation that no records were available was received April 8, 2022. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), including online GeoTracker files and the GAMA Groundwater Information System Records requested on April 4, 2022. Response was received stating that all digitized records could be found on GeoTracker, and all other records were hard copies. Information from GeoTracker for other sites in the Property vicinity is included as appropriate in this report. CalGEM Well Finder The CalGEM Well Finder database was queried on April 13, 2022. No oil or gas wells exist in the vicinity of the Property. GAMA Groundwater Information System The GAMA Groundwater Information System database was queried on October 22, 2021. 149 domestic, irrigation, municipal, or monitoring wells were found within approximately 1 mile of the Property. Reviews of information for the Property and surrounding vicinity from other readily available online databases including the USEPA RCRAInfo and Facility Registry Service (FRS) and the California Geologic Energy Management (CALGEM, formerly DOGGR) GIS-based Well Finder were also conducted. Information obtained from all agency correspondence and their associated online databases is included in Appendix G as relevant. Information pertinent to this Phase I ESA review from the agency requests is included throughout this report as appropriate. While as of the date of this report, a final response has not 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 18 been received from the San Luis Obispo County Fire Department and Local Oversight Program, given the other sources of information available for this review, this data gap is not deemed significant. 4.3.1 San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Department San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Department responded to the public records request by phone on April 8, 2022. It was stated that although the SLO DEH had significant files on the Property, the files were all hard copy and not able to be digitized. The hard copies of the files were unable to be reviewed, but the SLO DEH provided an inventory of all CUPA files for the Tank Farm and surrounding area. 312 total files were documented in the inventory, consisting of all sites along Tank Farm Road (many of which did not correspond to the Property). The majority of these files consisted of facilities not at the Site.. Files related to the Property regarded Unocal pipelines and the Tank Farm Road cleanup at the Chevron (former Unocal) facility appear to have been addressed in the RWQCB. 4.3.2 San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Records received from the SLO County Planning and Building Department consisted of historical permits and case summaries for various work activities performed on the Property dating back to 1989. These records included permits for the construction of access roads, demolition and construction of buildings, electrical work, and grading. Notable permits include the demolition of seven 55,000-barrel oil storage tanks between 1992 and 1993, the 1992 construction of the recycling facility on the Property, the 2005 SLO Airport Runway extension, a 2007 petroleum-impacted soil and groundwater remediation, and the 2014 Chevron Tank Farm remediation and restoration project. 4.3.3 San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District Records received from the SLO Air Pollution Control District consisted of the following: 2008 issuance of APCD Authority to Construct a standby diesel engine on the Property. 2009 inspection report of the emergency generator on the Property; and subsequent APCD permit to operate an emergency generator for the Property. 2012 Asbestos Assessment Workplan and Report of Findings: Workplan for an assessment of naturally occurring asbestos and material durability on the Property. Asbestos was not detected in any of the samples. 2017 Weekly Status Update from Padre Associates, Inc.: Report for the week of August 25, 2017; work completed includes excavation and backfill in the area of Reservoir 4, backfill and compaction within cap area, removal of pipelines, and export of impacted soil for disposal. 2018 Renewal Inspection Report of Remedial Activities: Inspection of remedial activities. Major components include pipeline decommissioning, excavation, and management / treatment of contaminated groundwater. The groundwater treatment system consists of oily water storage tanks, vapor phase carbon canisters, an oil/water separator, and a tank for recovered oil. Details soil excavation activities during the week of September 14, 2018. 2019 Renewal Inspection Report of Remedial Activities: Inspection of remedial activities. Work completed during the week of September 20, 2019 included North Marsh excavation and backfilling, grading, pipeline removal, road maintenance, and biological clearances and surveys. Includes 2019 inspection of emergency generator on the Property; the facility was found to be in compliance. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 19 2020 Renewal Inspection Report of Remedial Activities: Inspection of remedial activities. Work completed during the week of July 17, 2020 included excavation, road construction, demolition of old infrastructure (fencing, lighting), and maintenance at Reservoirs 5 and 7. Includes 2020 inspection of emergency generator on the Property; the facility was found to be in compliance. 2020 Compliance Inspection: Additional 2020 inspection report due to operations moving to the north side of Tank Farm Road. PID readings reportedly less than 100 ppm from the untreated pile, and odor mitigation was used. The facility was found to be in compliance. 2021 Renewal Inspection Report of Remedial Activities: Inspection and report of remedial activities. Work completed during the week of October 1, 2021 included excavation of backfill material, backfill of Reservoir 3, aggregate import, and geological clearance and monitoring. Reported that demolition of Reservoir 3 was completed on May 5, 2021. 2021 Air Emissions Calculations and Reports: Calculations of peak emissions for the second and third quarters 2021. The calculated peak quarter emissions were less than predicted in the Construction Activity Management Plan. Air quality monitoring logs from between 2017 and 2021 are included. 4.3.4 City of San Luis Obispo City Clerk (including Planning and Building, Public Works, and Fire Departments) The San Luis Obispo City Clerk responded to the public records request on April 11, 2022. The city reported that available reports from the Fire Department consisted of physical documents that were not digitized and were unable to be reviewed. It was stated that building department records for the Property consisted of files available on the San Luis Obispo website, which consisted of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Chevron Tank Farm. The FEIR is discussed in the User Provided Documents, Section 4.4. 4.3.5 Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) online GeoTracker files Phase I Subject Property Chevron (former Unocal) at 276 Tank Farm Road: The Property is associated with an open cleanup program case regarding the former tank farm that operated between 1910 and the late 1990s. The tank farm consisted of six aboveground earthen reservoirs and 21 ASTs. In 1926, lightning-induced fire caused several of the aboveground earthen crude oil holding tanks to rupture and spill approximately 200 million gallons of crude oil onto the ground. As of 2006, a land use covenant has been in place for the Property, which states that soil may not be excavated and groundwater may not be extracted without agency approval. Groundwater monitoring conducted since 1998 has indicated that a small, localized plume containing benzene and petroleum hydrocarbons exists immediately downgradient of the former office area in the northwest corner of the Property. This plume appears to be stable, and natural attenuation is occurring on the leading edge on the northwest side of the Property. Petroleum hydrocarbons have also been detected in surface water and wetlands on the Property. Chevron has initiated the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) process to remediate areas surface water and wetland contamination and develop approximately 40 acres of land on the northern portion of the Property with a business park and light industry. The FEIR discusses these plans for remediation and development, and is discussed further in Section 4.4. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 20 Most recently, a PFAS evaluation took place on the Property in October 2021, as detailed in the January 21, 2022 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sampling Results Investigation Report by Arcadis 19. This report stated that the Tank Farm’s historical FTA ceased operations in the 1970s, and it is unknown if PFAS- containing materials such as aqueous fire fighting foam (AFFF) were used at the Property. Concentrations of various PFAS compounds were detected in all wells and water sources sampled, with the highest concentrations detected along the southeastern boundary of the Property. This report concluded that the historical FTA on the Property was likely not a source of PFAS, and investigation is still ongoing. Unocal Pipeline at Tank Farm Road: This closed cleanup program case involves a pipeline that serviced the former Unocal Tank Farm Road facility. The pipeline was installed in approximately 1906 to convey crude oil, and a rupture was reportedly discovered in 1936. The pipes were replaced in 1950, and were formally decommissioned in 2001. Crude oil and BTEX compounds were the primary contaminants of concern. As of 2018, residual petroleum-impacted soil still existed at the site, but was undergoing natural biodegradation, and the 10 to 30 foot depth of contaminants made contact with pollutants unlikely. A site soil and groundwater management plan was developed as well to ensure proper handling and disposal of contaminated media. Closure with No Further Action determination was granted to the site in 2018 despite low remaining levels of contaminants. Adjacent or Nearby Sites Laidlaw Transit Facility at 4155 Santa Fe Road: This facility, located 55 feet east adjacent and upgradient of the Property, is associated with a closed LUST case regarding a 1990 release of diesel to groundwater. Site assessment and remediation were conducted between 1991 and 1992, and the case was closed in 1993. Based on the regulatory status of this facility and length of time for which it has been closed, it is not expected that this facility will represent an environmental concern for the Property. Zupan’s Equipment Rental at 635 Tank Farm Road: This facility, located 324 feet east adjacent and upgradient of the Property, is associated with a closed LUST case regarding a 1991 release of gasoline to groundwater. The case was closed in 1992, and no further information was available on GeoTracker. Based on the regulatory status of this facility, distance from the Property, and length of time for which it has been closed, it is not expected that this facility will represent an environmental concern for the Property. San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport at 975 Airport Drive: The San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport is located adjacent to the southeast border of the Property. This facility is associated with an open cleanup program case regarding a PFAS contamination investigation. The investigation has been ongoing since 2019 to identify the impacts to soil and groundwater of historical AFFF use. Elevated levels of PFAS were discovered in soil and ground water in the former and current AFFF storage area and former FTA. Investigation is currently ongoing, but the most recent data submittal indicated that elevated levels of PFAS compounds were detected in groundwater monitoring wells along the boundary between the Property and the Airport. 4.3.6 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), including Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) and Envirostor databases The DTSC responded to the public records request by email on April 8, 2022, stating that no records were found for the Property. 19https://documents.geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/8916303336/SLO%20Tank%20Farm%20PFAS 20Investigation%20Report%20FINAL%2001212022.pdf 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 21 4.3.7 GAMA Groundwater Information System The GAMA Groundwater Information System database was queried on April 13, 2022. 149 domestic, irrigation, municipal, or monitoring wells were found to exist or have formerly existed within approximately 1 mile of the Property. 4.4 User Provided Documents User-provided documents are available in Appendix H. User-provided documents for the Property consisted of the following: 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR): The FEIR, prepared by Marine Research Specialists, consists of an overview of the Property history, an analysis of the current status and environmental impacts, and a discussion of alternatives for the future use and redevelopment of the Property. The plan outlined for the Property consists of two main phases: a remediation and restoration component, and a development component. The remediation and restoration component consists of several activities to be performed: demolition of remaining buildings and portions of the earthen reservoirs, excavation of soil, site grading, capping, and increasing the quantity of wetland and plant habitat. The petroleum material impacting the Property is found at an average depth of 25 to 40 feet, but as deep as 60 feet. At the surface, crude oil expressions include solid coke to a low-density light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL). Excavation and other remedial actions are expected to impact approximately 43 acres of waters/wetland on the Property, which will be subsequently restored during the restoration phase. Once remediation and restoration are completed, the Property is slated to be redeveloped. The goal for the Property as described in the 2013 FEIR, is to develop approximately 17 percent of the Property for a business park, commercial uses, recreational uses, and right-of-way. The remaining area of the Property, primarily on the southern portion, will remain as open space. The redevelopment may also include the use of on-site groundwater and the construction of a wastewater treatment plant to serve the development, depending on if the Property is developed under the jurisdiction of the City or the County. The development would be phased over a 25-year period. 2015 Final Remedial Action Plan (RAP): A summary of the RAP is provided in Section 3.4.3, Natural Hazard Disclosure Report for San Luis Obispo County: This 2022 report by First American Professional Real Estate Services provides an overview of natural hazards for the Property, including areas of potential flooding and wetland areas. It classifies the northwest and southeast portions of the Property as flood hazard zones. Several facilities classified as hazardous waste generators are located in the vicinity of the Property, as discussed previously in Section 4.2.2. Development and Conservation Area Maps: Maps provided by Avocet Environmental outlining the areas for development (primarily on the northern portion of the Property) and areas for conservation/open space primarily on the southern portion of the Property). The schedule for remediation and restoration work is provided as well, dating between 2016 and 2030. The eastern and western portions of the Property are scheduled for remediation prior to the central areas, some of which has already been completed or is currently in progress. Covelop Redevelopment Plans: The User provided drawings and three-dimensional visualizations of their redevelopment plans for the Property. Covelop’s redevelopment plans only include redeveloping the northeast portion of the Property, with residential uses at the northeastern edge of the Property and business 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 22 park and commercial uses to the west of that, and redevelopment of a small area in the northwestern portion of the Property with residential and commercial mixed uses. 4.5 User Questionnaire Roux incorporated the completed ASTM 1527-13 User Questionnaire provided to Covelop, Inc. as the User of this report. The Questionnaire was completed during an interview with Bryan Hulburd as a representative of the User on March 29, 2022 and is summarized below. No environmental cleanup liens exist in connection with the Property; Activity and land use limitations are in place for the Property, as previously detailed; Covelop, Inc. acquired a nearby site at 600 Tank Farm in 2019. This site received entitlement approval for 280 residential condo units and 13,000 square feet of commercial space. The purchase price of the Property reflects the fair market value of the Property. Mr. Hulburd relayed his knowledge of past uses of the Property, specific chemical uses, chemical releases, and environmental cleanups that have taken place at the Property. He provided a summary of the historical use of the Property as a tank farm dating back to 1910, and the lightning-induced fire in 1926 that caused the large-scale crude oil release, as previously detailed. This information is consistent with the findings documented in other components of the Phase I ESA. The ASTM 1527-13 User Questionnaire is included in Appendix F. 4.6 Records Review Summary The Property is associated with a former tank farm that operated between 1910 and the 1980s and was used for the storage of crude oil. The tank farm consisted of six earthen reservoirs ranging in capacity from 775,000 to 1,350,000 barrels, and 21 steel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), each with a capacity of 55,000 barrels, for a total capacity of six million barrels of crude oil. A 1926 lightning strike ignited a fire, which burned the reservoirs and 14 of the 21 existing ASTs, and led to the release of all but a few thousand of the six million barrels. After the fire, Union Oil resumed operations and reconstructed 10 ASTs and four of the reservoirs. Regional pipeline operations were also conducted at the Property, primarily in the northwest portion, with support facilities including a pumphouse, boilers, and equipment houses. Database listings indicate additional leaks and ruptures of pipelines on the Property during the operational years as well. The tank farm was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. Other historical uses include the operation of a fire training school in the northwest portion of the Property, and the operation of a recycling facility between the early 1990s and 2000 on the northern portion of the Property. The fire training operations were suspended in the 1970s, and ASTs were decommissioned between the 1950s and 2000. Current contamination on the Property is primarily related to petroleum impacts, with crude oil found in soil as deep as 60 feet bgs. Oil has been reportedly encountered on the surface, with expressions ranging from asphalt-like coke to viscous liquid. Characterization efforts have found that petroleum in the subsurface is effectively immobile, and the migration of dissolved-phase constituents is controlled by biodegradation. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 23 Petroleum hydrocarbons have also been detected in surface water and wetlands on the Property. This residual petroleum contamination constitutes a REC for the Property. Most recently, a PFAS evaluation took place on the Property in October 2021, as detailed in the January 21, 2022 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sampling Results Investigation Report by Arcadis. This report stated that the Tank Farm’s historical FTA ceased operations in the 1970s, and it is unknown if PFAS- containing materials such as aqueous firefighting foam (AFFF) were used at the Property. Concentrations of various PFAS compounds were detected in all wells and water sources sampled, with the highest concentrations detected along the southeastern boundary of the Property. This report concluded that the historical FTA was likely not a source of PFAS, but that PFAS compounds are present in the groundwater beneath the Property. Investigation is currently ongoing to characterize the source and extent of PFAS contamination. The southeast adjacent SLO Airport is associated with an open cleanup program case regarding a PFAS contamination investigation. The investigation has been ongoing since 2019 to identify the impacts to soil and groundwater of historical AFFF use. Elevated levels of PFAS were discovered in soil and groundwater in the former and current AFFF storage area and former FTA. Investigation is currently ongoing, but the most recent data submittal indicated that elevated levels of PFAS compounds were detected in groundwater monitoring wells along the boundary between the Property and the Airport as recently as 2020. Plans for remediation, restoration, and redevelopment were outlined in the User-provided documents, particularly the FEIR and RAP and the Users preliminary of plans to redevelop the Property. The remediation and restoration plan consists of several activities to be performed: demolition of remaining buildings and portions of the earthen reservoirs, excavation of soil, site grading, capping of impacted soil to create a barrier between potential receptors, and increasing the quantity of wetland and plant habitat. Excavation and other remedial actions are expected to impact approximately 43 acres of waters/wetland on the Property, which will be subsequently restored during the restoration phase. Remediation and restoration activities are currently ongoing at the Property, and are expected to be completed by 2030. Once remediation and restoration are completed, the Property is slated to be redeveloped. The current goal for the Property is to develop within the same development area as outlined in the 2013 certified "Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final Environmental Report" with residential, commercial, business park and industrial uses in addition to right-of-way. The remaining area of the Property, primarily on the southern portion and western side of the northern portion, will remain as open space. The development would be phased over a multi-year period. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 24 PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE Roux principal Geologist Mr. David Dixon conducted a reconnaissance of the Property on Wednesday, April 20, 2022. The objective of the reconnaissance was to check for visual evidence of past/present use or storage of hazardous materials that could potentially affect the soil, groundwater, soil vapor, or surface soil or water quality at the Property. During the reconnaissance, all areas of the Property were accessible. Mr. Dixon was accompanied by Brian Hulburd and Damien Mavis of Covelop and a representative of Chevron and their environmental consultant, TriHydro Consultants. Photographs taken during reconnaissance are provided in Appendix I and described below. The Property totals approximately 332 acres, divided into north and south halves by Tank Farm Road, and was formerly operated as a tank farm beginning in 1910. It was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. It has been historically operated and is currently owned by Union Oil. The Property includes a small Chevron office administrative building in the northwestern portion of the Property with two adjacent portable office trailers. The Administrative office is approximately 6,000 square feet and is used for office and training purposes. No hazardous materials were observed except for consumer sized cleaning products (Photos 1-4 in Appendix I). The rest of the Property consists of land formerly developed as a tank farm that still has structures such as concrete lined reservoirs that formerly contained crude oil, earthen berms that surrounded now removed steel above ground crude oil tanks, underground oil piping and dirt and gravel lined pads and roads, grasslands, riparian areas, and wetlands. The Property was toured by vehicle stopping to observe different areas of the Site. There was evidence of recent grading in the northeastern corner of the Site referred to as the Flower Mound is Property documents. We understand that this is a naturally elevated area where soil is being removed to use for restoration in other areas of the Site. Site use as a former tank farm is evident in most of the Site where former tank pads, and berms are still present, as well as larger concrete reservoirs south of tank Farm Road. (Photos 6, 11, 12 and 13 in Appendix I). Chevron is actively conducting remediation and restoration in the reservoir areas south of Tank Farm Road and has an equipment staging yard adjacent to the south side of tank farm road. (Photos 7-10 in Appendix I). The surrounding area is generally used for commercial/industrial uses including the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport to the southeast. 5.1 Utilities Electricity is provided by Pacific Gas & Electric and water by the City of San Luis Obispo Utility Department. Garbage pickup is provided by the San Luis Garbage Company. 5.2 Hazardous Substances Not including hazardous substances previously identified in the subsurface, the staging yard had drums and totes including some partially full of a product identified as Solve Hydrocarbon Mitigation Agent. There were no obvious leaks from these containers (Photo 10 in Appendix I). 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 25 5.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls We did not observe any transformers on the Property. 5.4 Staining and Stressed Vegetation As previously described, the Site has tar visible is areas of the Site, and throughout the Property there were small chunks of asphalt like tar. The Property has well documented areas of stressed vegetation and there is an ongoing habitat restoration program to address this. 5.5 Drains and Sumps Sumps were not observed during Property reconnaissance. 5.6 Solid Waste No aboveground solid waste was observed. The site has areas undergoing soil remediation under regulatory agency oversight, so contaminated soil will be generated from time to time and will presumably be managed in accordance with the RAP and associated documents. 5.7 Wastewater No wastewater generating processes were observed during the Property reconnaissance. 5.8 Wells A deep groundwater production well was observed in the southeaster side of the Property (Photo 14 in Appendix I). The 2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Site lists that there are 25 active groundwater monitoring wells at the Site. 5.9 Other The Property has a history of documented petroleum releases while operating as a tank farm, and features indicative of a large quantities of petroleum storage were observed during Property reconnaissance. 5.10 Inaccessible Areas No areas of the Property were inaccessible at the time of the reconnaissance. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 26 PHASE I ESA SUMMARY Roux performed a Phase I ESA, in general accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, at the Property on behalf of the User. This Phase I ESA was conducted by investigating past Property uses, reviewing the results of a search of environmental databases, reviewing records at relevant government agencies, and performing a reconnaissance of the Property and surrounding area. The Property is located at 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo, California (Property). The associated Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) are 076-352-061, 076-352-062, 076-381-021, 076-382- 005, 076-383-001, and 076-383-002. The Property consists of fourteen parcels totaling approximately 332 acres, divided into north and south halves by Tank Farm Road, and was formerly operated as a tank farm beginning in 1910. It was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. It has been historically operated and is currently owned by Union Oil. Aside from the three current Chevron office buildings in the northwestern portion of the Property, the Property consists of land formerly developed as a tank farm that still has structures such as concrete lined reservoirs that formerly contained crude oil, earthen berms that surrounded now removed steel above ground crude oil tanks, underground oil piping and dirt and gravel lined pads and roads, grasslands, riparian areas, and wetlands. The surrounding area is generally used for commercial/industrial purposes with agricultural uses to the south. The Property is associated with a former tank farm that operated between 1910 and the 1980s and was used for the storage of crude oil. The tank farm consisted of six earthen reservoirs ranging in capacity from 775,000 to 1,350,000 barrels, and 21 steel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), each with a capacity of 55,000 barrels, for a total capacity of six million barrels of crude oil. A 1926 lightning strike ignited a fire, which burned the reservoirs and 14 of the 21 existing ASTs, and led to the release of all but a few thousand of the six million barrels. After the fire, Union Oil resumed operations and reconstructed 10 ASTs and four of the reservoirs. Regional pipeline operations were also conducted at the Property, primarily in the northwest portion, with support facilities including a pumphouse, boilers, and equipment houses. Database listings indicate additional leaks and ruptures of pipelines on the Property during the operational years. The tank farm was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. Other historical uses include the operation of a fire training school in the northwest portion of the Property, and the operation of a recycling facility between the early 1990s and 2000 on the northern portion of the Property. The fire training operations were suspended in the 1970s, and ASTs were decommissioned between the 1950s and 2000. Current contamination on the Property is primarily related to petroleum impacts, with crude oil found in soil as deep as 60 feet bgs. Oil has been reportedly encountered on the surface, with expressions ranging from asphalt-like coke to viscous liquid. Characterization efforts have found that petroleum in the subsurface is effectively immobile, and the migration of dissolved-phase constituents is controlled by biodegradation. Petroleum hydrocarbons have also been detected in surface water and wetlands on the Property. Petroleum impacts are also present in groundwater and there are soil gas impacts that include the presence of elevated benzene and methane. Most recently, a Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) evaluation took place on the Property in October 2021, as detailed in the January 21, 2022 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sampling Results Investigation Report by Arcadis. This report stated that the Tank Farm’s historical fire training area (FTA) 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 27 ceased operations in the 1970s, and it is unknown if PFAS-containing materials such as aqueous firefighting foam (AFFF) were used at the Property. Concentrations of various PFAS compounds were detected in all wells and water sources sampled, with the highest concentrations detected along the southeastern boundary of the Property. Investigation is currently ongoing to characterize the source and extent of PFAS contamination. Plans for remediation, restoration, and redevelopment were outlined in the User-provided documents, particularly the FEIR and RAP and the Users preliminary plans to redevelop the Property. The remediation and restoration plan consists of several activities to be performed: demolition of remaining buildings and portions of the earthen reservoirs, excavation of soil, site grading, capping of impacted soil to create a barrier between potential receptors, and increasing the quantity of wetland and plant habitat. Excavation and other remedial actions are expected to impact approximately 43 acres of waters/wetland on the Property, which will be subsequently restored during the restoration phase. The remediation and restoration activities described in the RAP are currently ongoing at the Property with some areas completed and others in progress or still planned. The final remediation and restoration activities are expected to be completed by 2030. The User is anticipating redeveloping portions of the Property as the remediation and restoration is completed. The current goal for the Property is to develop within the same development area as outlined in the 2013 certified "Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final Environmental Report" with residential, commercial, business park and industrial uses in addition to right-of-way. The remaining area of the Property, primarily on the southern portion, will remain as open space. The development would be phased over a multi-year period. The following REC was identified at the Property: Historic Use and Operation of Former Unocal Tank Farm: The Property was operational as a tank farm between 1910 and the 1990s. Over the history of the tank farm, crude oil was stored in six large earthen reservoirs and 21 ASTs, which sustained significant damage during a 1926 fire and resulted in the release of approximately 200 million gallons of oil onto the Property. Additional releases caused by pipeline ruptures have been documented throughout the Property history as well. Groundwater sampling conducted since 1998 has indicated residual levels of petroleum and VOC contamination on the Property in soil and groundwater. The plume has been characterized as relatively stable, unlikely to migrate offsite, and is currently being addressed by remedial activities outlined in the 2015 Final Remedial Action Plan. No HRECs, CRECs or de minimis conditions were identified at the Property. Business environmental risks (BERs) are conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate agencies; however, these conditions may have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of the Property. The following BERs were identified for the Property: Recent investigations have found elevated levels of PFAS compounds in groundwater on the Property, particularly on the southeast border. PFAS compounds are not currently classified as a hazardous substance under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), nor are there currently any federal or California promulgated concentration limits in groundwater or drinking water, but there likely will be future regulation of PFAS compounds 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 28 in groundwater. Consequently, the presence of PFAS compounds in groundwater at the Property is considered a BER. Data Gap Review: the ASTM Standard requires that the report identify any obvious uses of the Property since 1940 or first developed, whichever is earliest and significant data gaps which affect the ability of the environmental professional to identify recognized environmental conditions. Historical Property use and ownership are well documented from 1939 to current use. Based on this information, no significant data gaps in historical records have been identified for the Property. As of the date of this report, a final response has not been received from the San Luis Obispo County Fire Department and Local Oversight Program. However, given the other sources of information available for this review, this data gap is not deemed significant. 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 29 REPORT ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS The Phase I ESA described herein was conducted by Roux in general accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, which is consistent with the regulatory requirements for conducting all appropriate inquiries (40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries; Final Rule 20). The preamble for the AAI Rule states: In today's final rule, EPA is referencing the standards and practices developed by ASTM International and known as Standard E1527-05 (entitled “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process'') and recognizing the E1527-05 standard as consistent with today's final rule. The Agency determined that this voluntary consensus standard is consistent with today's final rule and is compliant with the statutory criteria for all appropriate inquiries. Persons conducting all appropriate inquiries may use the procedures included in the ASTM E1527-05 standard to comply with today's final rule.21 This AAI Rule was subsequently amended in 2013, as indicated in the following “Background”: With today's action, EPA is establishing that parties seeking liability relief under CERCLA's landowner liability protections, as well as recipients of brownfields grants for conducting site assessments, will be considered to have met the standards and practices for all appropriate inquiries, as set forth in the Brownfields Amendments to CERCLA and 40 CFR Part 312, if such parties follow the procedures provided in the ASTM E1527-13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.” EPA made this determination based upon the Agency's finding that the ASTM E1527-13 standard is compliant with the All Appropriate Inquiries Rule. Therefore, parties conducting all appropriate inquiries may use the procedures in the newly issued ASTM E1527-13 standard when conducting all appropriate inquiries.22 It is Roux’s understanding that this Phase I ESA was requested by User so that User may qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). One of the requirements that a person acquiring real property must meet in order to qualify for one of these limitations on liability under CERCLA is to perform all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the AAI Rule (or the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13) prior to the acquisition of the property. The User has acknowledged that, under the AAI Rule, Roux’s performance of the Phase I ESA described herein will not alone result in User satisfying all of the requirements of the AAI Rule and provide a defense to CERCLA liability. Further, User has acknowledged that the AAI Rule requires that certain additional inquiries be undertaken to satisfy the CERCLA AAI requirements. Accordingly, Roux makes no guarantees or warranties, expressed or implied, regarding this Phase I ESA, including without limitation, any warranty that this Phase I WSA will in fact qualify User for a defense to CERCLA liability. Roux has performed this Phase I ESA in a professional manner using that degree of skill and care exercised for similar projects under similar conditions by reputable and competent environmental consultants. Professional judgments expressed herein are based on the facts currently available to Roux. The AAI Rule requires, and the conclusions stated herein represent the application of a variety of engineering and technical disciplines to material facts and conditions associated with the Property. As such, these conclusions are based on subjective interpretations and the exercise of discretion. Many of these facts and 20 Final Rule and information available at www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/regneg.htm#final_rule, and https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-31112. 21 Federal Register: November 1, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 210), page 66081. 22 Federal Register: December 30, 2013 (Volume 78, Number 250). 3374.0002S.100/R Phase I ESA, 276 Tank Farm Road | ROUX | 30 conditions are subject to change over time. Accordingly, the conclusions must be considered within this context. The User has agreed that Roux shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the Phase I ESA was performed. To the extent practicable, Roux has identified data gaps and has evaluated the potential significance of such data gaps. By referencing this information, Roux does not accept responsibility for the accuracy of the underlying reported data. This Phase I ESA Report should not be considered a legal interpretation of existing environmental laws and regulations. The Phase I ESA was conducted with a reasonable degree of inquiry to identify RECs, but uncertainty is not eliminated. No Phase I ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. The Phase I ESA process is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, the uncertainty involved with identifying RECs. This Phase I ESA Report is not an appraisal or value judgment of the Property. The User has agreed that Roux shall not be liable for any use of the Phase I ESA Report as an appraisal or value judgment of the Property. The Phase I ESA Report has been prepared for the exclusive use of User for specific application to the Property. The User has agreed that any third-party use of this Phase I ESA Report is User sole responsibility and at User’s sole liability. We declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312. Respectfully submitted, ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. David Dixon Principal Geologist Michael Friedman Senior Geologist Missy Muilenburg Staff Engineer Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX FIGURES 1. Site Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. RAP Operable Units 4. RAP Parcel Completion Schedule 5. Trihydro Grading Plan Prepared for: Title: Compiled by: Prepared by: Project Mgr: File: Date: Project: Scale: FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP 276 TANK FARMROADSANLUISOBISPO, CALIFORNIA COVELOP, INC. MM MM DD 15APR2022 AS SHOWN 3957.0001S000 SLO TANK FARM FIGURES.DWGS:\ DIXON Prepared for:Title:Compiled by: Prepared by:Project Mgr:File:Date:Project:Scale:FIGURE2SITE PLAN WITHPROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDICES A. EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck B. U.S. Geological Survey Historical Topographic Maps C. Historical Aerial Photographs D. City Directory Abstract E. Sanborn Maps F. User Questionnaire G. Regulatory Response Documents H. User-Provided Documents I. Property Photographs Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX A EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck FORM-LBC-JBR kcehCoeGhtiwtropeR ™paMsuidaRRDEehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Inquiry Number: 6926581.2s April 05, 2022 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 9 Orphan Summary 961 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-10 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-12 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC6926581.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 COORDINATES 35.2486270 - 35ˆ14’ 55.05’’Latitude (North): 120.6602800 - 120ˆ39’ 37.00’’Longitude (West): Zone10UniversalTranverseMercator: 712880.4UTMX (Meters): 3902926.5UTMY (Meters): 127 ft. above sealevelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 12017291 PISMO BEACH, CATargetPropertyMap: 2018VersionDate: 12016401 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CANorthMap: 2018VersionDate: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140604PortionsofPhotofrom: USDASource: 6926581.2s Page 2 D39 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, EMI, NPDES, WDS,... Lower 1 ft. D38 KASARJIAN TRADING CO 281 TANK FARM RD FINDS, ECHO Lower 1 ft. D37 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM ROAD FINDS, ECHO Lower 1 ft. D36 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD FINDS Lower 1 ft. B35 CCM PRODUCTSNA INC 275 TANK FARM RD FINDS Lower 1 ft. D34 KASARJIAN TRADING CO 281 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1 ft. A33 34015WQ06 SLO TANK F CERS Higher 1 ft. D32 FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD CUPA Listings Lower 1 ft. D31 SAN LOUIS OBISPO TOW 281 TANK FARM RD. FINDS, ECHO Lower 1 ft. D30 FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1 ft. C29 GRAVEL PIT MINES MRDS Higher 1 ft. A28 34015WQ06 SLO TANK F CIWQS Higher 1 ft. B27 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD STE HAZNET, HWTS Lower 1 ft. B26 CCM OFFROAD & PERFOR 275 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1 ft. B25 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD #B CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Lower 1 ft. B24 DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1 ft. A23 CHEVRON (FORMER UNOC 276 TANK FARM "ROAD CERS TP A22 276 TANK FARM ROAD ERNS TP A21 276 TANK FARM RD ERNS TP A20 276 TANK FARM RD DRA CHMIRS TP A19 CHEVRON USA - ABNU00 276 TANK FARM RD CPS-SLIC, DEED, HAZNET, HWTS TP A18 276 TANK FARM RD TAN CHMIRS TP A17 UNOCAL - TANK FARM R 276 TANK FARM RD FINDS TP A16 276 TANK FARM ROAD ERNS TP A15 276 TANK FARM ROAD ERNS TP A14 276 TANK FARM ROAD ERNS TP A13 276 TANK FARM ROAD ERNS TP A12 SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK 276 TANK FARM RD CPS-SLIC, CHMIRS, CUPA Listings, NPDES, CIWQS,... TP A11 UNOCAL TANK FARM FAC 276 TANK FARM RD RGA LUST TP A10 276 TANKFARM RD ERNS TP A9 276 TANK FARM RD AT CHMIRS TP A8 UNION OIL COMPANY OF 276 TANK FARM ROAD FINDS, ECHO TP A7 UNION OIL COMPANY OF 276 TANK FARM ROAD EMI, CERS TP A6 CHEVRON COMPANIES 276 TANK FARM RD EDR Hist Auto TP A5 276 TANK FARM ROAD, CHMIRS TP A4 ABNU0002 SLO TANK FA 276 TANK FARM RD RCRA-SQG TP A3 UNOCAL 276 TANK FARM ROAD CHMIRS, EMI TP A2 SLOCO RECYCLES 438 TANK FARM RD HAZNET, CIWQS, HWTS TP A1 FORMER CHEVRON SAN L 276 TANK FARM CERS TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITENAMEADDRESS 6926581.2s Page 3 J78 REEVES AUTOMOTIVE RE 235 TANK FARM RD UNI CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J77 ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM RD CUPA Listings Higher 444, 0.084, WSW 76 WELL 01 PFAS Lower 426, 0.081, SW I75 INDEPENDENT RACE SHO 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT CUPA Listings Lower 371, 0.070, SW I74 SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION 225 SUBURBAN RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS, HWTS Lower 371, 0.070, SW H73 ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD LUST, AST, CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS, CUPA... Higher 324, 0.061, East H72 ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD Cortese, HWTS Higher 324, 0.061, East H71 635 TANK FARM AST Higher 324, 0.061, East H70 UNITED RENTALS INC # 635 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 324, 0.061, East 69 FORMER MARTINELLI PR PRADO ROAD CPS-SLIC, CERS Lower 269, 0.051, NW 68 WELL 01 PFAS Lower 265, 0.050, SW 67 WELL 01 PFAS Lower 208, 0.039, SW E66 INK SPOT 4110 HORIZON LN # F RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 170, 0.032, SW E65 CLOUD COMPANY, INC 4120 HORIZON LN #A CUPA Listings Lower 109, 0.021, SSW F64 SPYGLASS ASSOCIATES 4115 SANTA FE ROAD HIST UST Higher 98, 0.019, ESE G63 JEFFERIS AUTO BODY 4130 HORIZON #C CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Lower 84, 0.016, SSW G62 KEN’S BODY SHOP 4130 HORIZON LN #D CUPA Listings Lower 84, 0.016, SSW G61 SAN LUIS AMBULANCE S 4130 HORIZON LN #B CUPA Listings Lower 84, 0.016, SSW G60 KEN’S BODY SHOP 4130 HORIZON LN #D CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Lower 84, 0.016, SSW G59 WADE BROWN - JEFF WO 4130 HORIZON LN STE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 84, 0.016, SSW F58 SAES PUREGAS 4173 SANTA FE ROAD ENVIROSTOR Higher 57, 0.011, ESE F57 LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACI 4155 SANTA FE RD LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 55, 0.010, ESE 56 SAES PARKER UHP COMP 4175 B SANTA FE RD RCRA-SQG Higher 55, 0.010, ESE F55 AM PAC REPAIR 4149 SANTA FE ST UNI RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 54, 0.010, ESE F54 AM PAC REPAIR 4149 SANTA FE ST #8 CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings Higher 54, 0.010, ESE B53 JEFFERIS AUTO BODY 269 TANK FARM ROAD CERS HAZ WASTE, FINDS, CUPA Listings, EMI, CERS Lower 23, 0.004, WSW E52 WELL 01 PFAS Lower 10, 0.002, SSW D51 FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD ECHO Lower 1 ft. D50 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD HAZNET, HWTS Lower 1 ft. D49 D’ANGELOS & SONS INC 277 TANK FARM RD HAZNET, HWTS Lower 1 ft. B48 CCM OFF ROAD AND PER 275 TANK FARM RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Lower 1 ft. B47 CCM OFFROAD & PERFOR 275 TANK FARM RD FINDS, ECHO Lower 1 ft. B46 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD STE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1 ft. B45 DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD CUPA Listings, HAZNET, WDR, CIWQS, HWTS Lower 1 ft. B44 VALOR WINE CO., LLC 271 TANK FARM CERS Lower 1 ft. B43 DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD FINDS, ECHO Lower 1 ft. B42 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD STE FINDS, ECHO Lower 1 ft. D41 FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD FINDS Lower 1 ft. C40 BRUGHELLI PIT 547 PRADO ROAD MINES Higher 1 ft. MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITENAMEADDRESS 6926581.2s Page 4 Q117 WELL 02 PFAS Higher 754, 0.143, SE P116 CON WAY FREIGHT USM 219 A TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 746, 0.141, WSW M115 ELECTRICRAFT, INC. 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SU RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 697, 0.132, SW J114 UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TA TANK FARM RD CPS-SLIC, WDS Higher 688, 0.130, WSW J113 UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TA TANK FARM RD CPS-SLIC, CERS Higher 687, 0.130, WSW O112 KOMPOGAS SLO LLC 4300 OLD SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 661, 0.125, SSE O111 KOMPOGAS SLO LLC 4300 OLD SANTA FE RO CERS HAZ WASTE, CHMIRS, CUPA Listings, EMI, NPDES,... Higher 661, 0.125, SSE N110 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTI 645 CLARION CT CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS, HWTS Higher 660, 0.125, ESE N109 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTI 645 CLARION CT RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 660, 0.125, ESE N108 SNIDER PRECISION, IN 648 CLARION CT RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 654, 0.124, ESE 107 BOX KITE BARN YARD,I BEHIND 650 TANK FARM RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 620, 0.117, East M106 TRIPLETT HARPS 220 SUBURBAN RD STE CUPA Listings Lower 600, 0.114, SW 105 WELL 01, STANDBY PFAS Higher 600, 0.114, ESE L104 NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TF 660 TANK FARM RD. RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 590, 0.112, East I103 KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, I 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Lower 557, 0.105, SW 102 PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, 3563 SUELDO ST CUPA Listings Higher 536, 0.102, NW K101 SAN LUIS SOURDOUGH 3580 SUELDO ST/3877 FINDS, CUPA Listings, EMI, NPDES, WDS, CIWQS, CERS Higher 520, 0.098, WNW K100 DEL INDUSTRIES 3580 SUELDO STREET RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 520, 0.098, WNW K99 ZONE 5 TECHNOLOGIES 3580 SUELDO ST 3580 RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 520, 0.098, WNW H98 ACME AUTO BODY 645 TANK FARM RD #L CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings Higher 515, 0.098, East H97 STAR AUTOMOTIVE - MO 645 TANK FARM #F CUPA Listings Higher 515, 0.098, East H96 SLO SAIL AND CANVAS 645 TANK FARM RD. SU RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 515, 0.098, East H95 ACME AUTOBODY 645 TANK FARM RD STE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 515, 0.098, East K94 PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES 277 GRANADA DR RCRA-LQG, CPS-SLIC, CERS HAZ WASTE, TRIS, FINDS,... Higher 498, 0.094, WNW J93 PERFORMANCE MARINE 245 TANK FARM RD H CUPA Listings Higher 445, 0.084, WSW J92 ACCESSORY PRODUCTION 245 TANK FARM RD UNI RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 445, 0.084, WSW J91 SLO PERFORMANCE MARI 245 TANK FARM RD UNI RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 445, 0.084, WSW J90 SAN LUIS AMBULANCE 261 TANK FARM RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS, HWTS Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J89 PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 251 TANK FARM RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J88 REEVES AUTOMOTIVE RE 235 TANK FARM RD UNI RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J87 ARNOLD & TODD INDUST 235 TANK FARM RD F CUPA Listings Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J86 BOB HOLZER TOWING 235 TANK FARM RD #G CUPA Listings Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J85 SAN LUIS AMBULANCE S 261 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J84 REEVES AUTOMOTIVE RE 235 TANK FARM #C CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J83 MAINO CONSTRUCTION C 265 TANK FARM ROAD HIST UST, CUPA Listings Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J82 ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J81 ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM ROAD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J80 SAN LUIS OBISPO 267 TANK FARM ROAD HIST UST Higher 444, 0.084, WSW J79 ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 444, 0.084, WSW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITENAMEADDRESS 6926581.2s Page 5 Q156 SAN LUIS GARBAGE COM 4388 OLD SANTA FE RO AST, HAULERS, EMI, NPDES, CIWQS Higher 956, 0.181, SE W155 LIQUID GRAVITY BREWI 675 CLARION CT CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 954, 0.181, ESE W154 SANTA MARIA BREWING 675 CLARION CT CUPA Listings, NPDES, CIWQS Higher 954, 0.181, ESE S153 FEDEX FREIGHT WEST 250 BONNETTI DR CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS, CERS Higher 939, 0.178, NW R152 VPA AUTO REPAIR 223 GRANADA DR A/B CUPA Listings Higher 933, 0.177, WNW S151 FEDEX FREIGHT SLO 250 BONETTI DR RCRA-SQG, UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST, FINDS, ECHO Higher 929, 0.176, NW S150 VIKING FREIGHT SYSTE 250 BONNETTI DR SWEEPS UST, CUPA Listings Higher 929, 0.176, NW S149 250 BONNETTI AST Higher 929, 0.176, NW V148 WELL 01 PFAS Higher 919, 0.174, SE R147 JBL SCIENTIFIC 227 GRANADA ENVIROSTOR Higher 904, 0.171, WNW P146 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY 224 TANK FARM RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 898, 0.170, WSW P145 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN 224 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 898, 0.170, WSW T144 HELIPRO INC 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 881, 0.167, SSE T143 CUESTA AVIATION 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings Higher 881, 0.167, SSE T142 CUESTA AVIATION INC 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 881, 0.167, SSE T141 SUNWEST AVIATION 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings Higher 881, 0.167, SSE T140 HELIPRO INC 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings, HWTS Higher 881, 0.167, SSE T139 AEROCADEMY 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 881, 0.167, SSE U138 ENTEGRIS 4175 SANTA FE RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 869, 0.165, ESE U137 ENTEGRIS INC 4175 SANTA FE RD RCRA-SQG, FINDS Higher 869, 0.165, ESE T136 HANGAR 46 4345 OLD SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings Higher 864, 0.164, SSE S135 FZIOMED INC 231 BONETTI DR CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 831, 0.157, NW S134 FZIO MED INC 231 BONETTI DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 831, 0.157, NW S133 FZIOMED INC 231 BONETTI DR CUPA Listings Higher 831, 0.157, NW L132 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN 675 TANK FARM RD HIST UST Higher 828, 0.157, East L131 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN 675 TANK FARM ROAD HIST UST, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 828, 0.157, East L130 S.L.O COUNTY FARM SU 675 TANK FARM RD ENVIROSTOR, LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 828, 0.157, East R129 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIO 254 GRANADA DR AST, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 809, 0.153, WNW P128 GOT YOU COVER’D INC 211 TANK FARM RD CUPA Listings Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P127 XPO LOGISTICS FREIGH 219 TANK FARM RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P126 CALPORTLAND CONSTRUC 219 TANK FARM RD. # US MINES Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P125 SAN LUIS OBISPO READ 219B TANK FARM RD AST Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P124 219 TANK FARM AST Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P123 SAN LUIS OBISPO PAIN 225 TANK FARM ROAD ( RCRA-SQG Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P122 SAN LUIS STRUCK SERV 219 TANK FARM RD RCRA-SQG, LUST, CPS-SLIC, HAULERS, CHMIRS, FINDS,... Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P121 SAN LUIS OBISPO READ 219B TANK FARM RD CERS TANKS, CERS Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P120 SAN LUIS OBISPO PAIN 225 TANK FARM RD STE CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 777, 0.147, WSW P119 SAN LUIS OBISPO READ 219B TANK FARM RD CUPA Listings Higher 777, 0.147, WSW O118 MCCARTHY STEEL 4330 OLD SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings Higher 771, 0.146, SSE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITENAMEADDRESS 6926581.2s Page 6 AC195 IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USA 3474 EMPRESA DR STE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1219, 0.231, NW AE194 HANGAR 46 AVIATION 4345 SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1201, 0.227, SE AE193 4349 SANTA FE AST Higher 1201, 0.227, SE AE192 SAN LUIS JET CENTER 4349 SANTA FE RD HG- CUPA Listings Higher 1201, 0.227, SE Y191 ART’S CYCLERY 181 SUBURBAN RD CUPA Listings Lower 1179, 0.223, WSW AC190 VINTAGE AUTOBODY 3453 EMPRESA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1177, 0.223, NW AC189 VINTAGE AUTO BODY 3453 EMPRESA DR B AST, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 1177, 0.223, NW AD188 PACIFIC WEST CIRCUIT 189 GRANADA DR CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 1174, 0.222, WNW AD187 PACIFIC WEST CIRCUIT 189 GRANADA DR RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1174, 0.222, WNW AD186 HIBSHMAN CORP 3563 EMPLEO ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1173, 0.222, WNW Z185 WAGNERS IMPORT SERVI 202 TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1170, 0.222, WSW Z184 TANK FARM RD MTBE SO 202-275 TANK FARM RO CPS-SLIC, CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 1170, 0.222, WSW Z183 RENTAL DEPOT INC 202 TANK FARM RD STE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1170, 0.222, WSW Z182 C S S INC 202B TANK FARM RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1170, 0.222, WSW Z181 WAGNERS IMPORT SERVI 202 TANK FARM RD STE CUPA Listings Higher 1170, 0.222, WSW Z180 ALLTECH SERVICES INC 202 TANK FARM RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS, HWTS Higher 1170, 0.222, WSW V179 WELL 01 PFAS Higher 1152, 0.218, SE AB178 CB & I CONSTRUCTORS, 4388 SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings Higher 1151, 0.218, SE V177 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFI 4378 OLD SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1136, 0.215, SE AC176 OTIS AUTO BODY 3473 EMPRESA DR RCRA-SQG Higher 1134, 0.215, NW AB175 FILBIN ILLEGAL LANDF 4398 SANTE FE RD CUPA Listings Higher 1123, 0.213, SE AB174 FILBIN PROPERTY 4398 SANTA FE RD RCRA-SQG, SWF/LF, HAZNET, NPDES, HWTS Higher 1123, 0.213, SE AA173 LUXURY LIGHTING 712 FIERO LN 28 CUPA Listings Higher 1102, 0.209, ESE AA172 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE 712 FIERO LN CUPA Listings Higher 1102, 0.209, ESE AA171 LUXURY LIGHTING LARR 712 FIERO LN RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1102, 0.209, ESE X170 BORDEN CNC FABRICATI 203 GRANADA DR CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 1093, 0.207, WNW Z169 AIRGAS USA, LLC - NO 205 TANK FARM RD CUPA Listings Higher 1079, 0.204, WSW Z168 WELL 01 PFAS Higher 1067, 0.202, WSW S167 JENIKE & JOHANSON IN 3485 EMPRESA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1045, 0.198, NW S166 JENIKE & JOHANSON, I 3485 EMPRESA CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 1045, 0.198, NW S165 JENIKE AND JOHANSON 3485 EMPRESA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1045, 0.198, NW S164 JENIKE & JOHANSON, I 3485 EMPRESA CUPA Listings Higher 1045, 0.198, NW Y163 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD RCRA-SQG, LUST, UST, CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST,...Lower 997, 0.189, SW X162 MARTINON, JAVIER 215 MEISSNER LN CUPA Listings Higher 962, 0.182, WNW Q161 HZIU KOMPOGAS SLO, I 4388 OLD SANTA FE SP SWF/LF, CERS Higher 956, 0.181, SE Q160 SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 956, 0.181, SE Q159 SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS, HWTS Higher 956, 0.181, SE Q158 SAN LUIS GARBAGE COM 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS, CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 956, 0.181, SE Q157 CB AND I INC 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 956, 0.181, SE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITENAMEADDRESS 6926581.2s Page 7 AK234 WINGS WEST AIRLINES, 835 AIRPORT DR LUST, SWEEPS UST, Cortese, CUPA Listings, CERS,... Higher 2418, 0.458, ESE AJ233 J B DEWAR INC 75 PRADO RD LUST, AST, CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST, CHMIRS,... Lower 2397, 0.454, NW AJ232 DIAMOND OIL SERVICE 75 A PRADO RD RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO, HWP, CERS Lower 2397, 0.454, NW 231 WELL 02 PFAS Lower 2336, 0.442, SW 230 CALIFORNIA COOPERAGE 870 INDUSTRIAL WAY ENVIROSTOR, AST, CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 2304, 0.436, ENE 229 WELL 01 PFAS Lower 2233, 0.423, WSW 228 WELL 01 PFAS Higher 2152, 0.408, ENE 227 B & B BODY SHOP INC 845 FIERO LN ENVIROSTOR, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 1993, 0.377, ESE 226 EG&G COATINGS 710 AEROVISTA PARKWA ENVIROSTOR, CPS-SLIC, CERS Higher 1960, 0.371, ESE 225 WELL 01 - STBY PFAS Higher 1432, 0.271, ESE AG224 COWAN (FORMER SERAFI EAST PRADO ROAD CPS-SLIC, CERS Higher 1376, 0.261, NNW AF223 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBI 500 PRADO ROAD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1312, 0.248, NNE AI222 SPICE HUNTER, THE 184 SUBURBAN RD CUPA Listings Lower 1306, 0.247, WSW AI221 THE SPICE HUNTER INC 184 SUBURBAN RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1306, 0.247, WSW AI220 SPICE HUNTER, THE 184 SUBURBAN RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Lower 1306, 0.247, WSW AE219 ALLTEC INTERGARATED 4330 B SANTA FE RD CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 1303, 0.247, SE AD218 SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR 3534 EMPLEO STE B CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 1301, 0.246, WNW AH217 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY P 4115 BROAD ST STE B- CUPA Listings, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 1300, 0.246, East AH216 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY P 4115 BROAD ST STE B- RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1300, 0.246, East AH215 CA HIGHWAY PATROL CO 4115 BROAD STREET, S CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 1300, 0.246, East AD214 ABILITY CENTER 3548 EMPLEO ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1299, 0.246, WNW AD213 KNECHT’S PLUMBING & 3548 EMPLEO ST HIST UST, CUPA Listings Higher 1299, 0.246, WNW AD212 KENCHTS PLUMBING AND 3548 EMPLEO ST HIST UST, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 1299, 0.246, WNW AD211 KNECHT’S PLUMBING 3548 EMPLEO ST UST Higher 1299, 0.246, WNW AG210 BUS & TRUCK SERVICE 241 PRADO RD # B RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1291, 0.245, NW AG209 BUS & TRUCK SERVICE 241 PRADO RD UNIT B AST, CUPA Listings Higher 1291, 0.245, NW AG208 TRIBE AUTOMOTIVE 241 PRADO RCRA-VSQG Higher 1291, 0.245, NW AG207 TRIBE AUTO 241 PRADO RD CUPA Listings, HWTS Higher 1291, 0.245, NW AA206 CRYSTAL ENGINEERING 708 FIERO LANE STE 9 CUPA Listings, CERS Higher 1280, 0.242, ESE AA205 CRYSTAL ENGINEERING 708 FIERO LN STE 9 RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1280, 0.242, ESE AA204 BLAIR ENGINEERING 710 FIERO LANE, #14 RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1265, 0.240, ESE AA203 BLAIR ENGINEERING 710 FIERO LANE, #14 RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1265, 0.240, ESE AA202 SANSONE COMPANY INC 710-21 FIERO LN RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1265, 0.240, ESE AG201 TIM’S CONCRETE PUMPI 277 PRADO RD CUPA Listings Higher 1260, 0.239, NW AC200 STANTEC CONSULTING S 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1252, 0.237, NW AC199 STANTEC CONSULTING S 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE, RCRA-SQG Higher 1252, 0.237, NW 198 KENNETH DUKES 179 GRANADA #4 RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1244, 0.236, WNW AF197 CENTRAL COAST LANDSC 445 PRADO ROAD CUPA Listings, EMI, WDR, CIWQS, CERS Higher 1230, 0.233, North AC196 OTIS AUTO BODY 3474 EMPRESA DR CUPA Listings Higher 1219, 0.231, NW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITENAMEADDRESS 6926581.2s Page 8 243 SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, Cortese Lower 4985, 0.944, WSW 242 NORTH CALLE JOAQUIN DENNY’S AND BOB’S Notify 65 Lower 4887, 0.926, West 241 BEDLO, INC 3045 DUNCAN ENVIROSTOR, CUPA Listings Higher 4625, 0.876, NE 240 BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE 825 BUCKLEY ROAD ENVIROSTOR, CUPA Listings, EMI, HAZNET, NPDES,... Higher 4289, 0.812, SE 239 NOLL INCORPORATED 390 BUCKLEY RD RR #3 ENVIROSTOR, HAZNET, HWTS Higher 3994, 0.756, SE 238 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS O 901 AIRPORT DR RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, HIST UST, FINDS, ECHO Higher 3335, 0.632, ESE 237 FORMER ELECTRONIC RE 990 INDUSTRIAL WAY ENVIROSTOR Higher 3127, 0.592, ENE 236 UNITED PARCEL SERVIC 3601 SACRAMENTO LUST, CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST, CERS TANKS,... Higher 2458, 0.466, ENE AK235 WINGS WEST AIRLINES, 835 AIRPORT LUST, CUPA Listings, EMI, HIST CORTESE Higher 2418, 0.458, ESE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITENAMEADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 9 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPAIDDatabase(s)Site FORMER CHEVRON SAN L 276 TANK FARM SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/ACERS SLOCO RECYCLES 438 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAL000123867 CIWQS HWTS UNOCAL 276 TANK FARM ROAD SLO, CA 93401 N/ACHMIRS OES Incident Number: 07608 EMI Facility Id: 28 ABNU0002 SLO TANK FA 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 CAR000054825RCRA-SQG EPA ID:: CAR000054825 276 TANK FARM ROAD, 276 TANK FARM ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/ACHMIRS OES Incident Number: 08-6748 CHEVRON COMPANIES 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/AEDRHistAuto UNION OIL COMPANY OF 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 N/AEMI Facility Id: 11214 CERS UNION OIL COMPANY OF 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/AFINDS Registry ID:: 110013912597 ECHO Registry ID: 110013912597 276 TANK FARM RD AT 276 TANK FARM RD AT SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA N/ACHMIRS OES Incident Number: 08533 276 TANKFARM RD 276 TANKFARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/AERNS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 NRC Report #: 285034 Incident Date Time: 1995-03-30 09:00:00 UNOCAL TANK FARM FAC 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA N/ARGALUST SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/ACPS-SLIC Database: SLIC REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Facility Status: Pollution Characterization CHMIRS OES Incident Number: 12-5022 CUPA Listings Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012485 Status: Active, billable NPDES Facility Status: Active CIWQS CERS 276 TANK FARM ROAD 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN MARGURITA, CA 93401 N/AERNS NRC Report #: 265186 Incident Date Time: 1994-10-13 09:00:00 276 TANK FARM ROAD 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN MARGURITA, CA 93401 N/AERNS NRC Report #: 265265 Incident Date Time: 1994-10-13 12:00:00 276 TANK FARM ROAD 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/AERNS NRC Report #: 264893 Incident Date Time: 1994-10-11 13:15:00 276 TANK FARM ROAD 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 N/AERNS NRC Report #: 1022023 Incident Date Time: 2012-08-23 10:10:00 UNOCAL - TANK FARM R 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/AFINDS Registry ID:: 110065857923 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 276 TANK FARM RD TAN 276 TANK FARM RD TAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/ACHMIRS OES Incident Number: 156 CHEVRON USA - ABNU00 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/ACPS-SLIC Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Status: Open - Remediation Global Id: SL203011375 DEED Status: OPEN - REMEDIATION Envirostor ID: SL203011375 HAZNET GEPAID: CAR000054825 HWTS 276 TANK FARM RD DRA 276 TANK FARM RD DRA SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/ACHMIRS OES Incident Number: 07627 276 TANK FARM RD 276 TANK FARM RD SANTA MARGURITA, CA 93401 N/AERNS NRC Report #: 269701 Incident Date Time: 1994-11-14 12:00:00 276 TANK FARM ROAD 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/AERNS NRC Report #: 264682 Incident Date Time: 1994-10-10 15:45:00 CHEVRON (FORMER UNOC 276 TANK FARM "ROAD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 N/ACERS DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites NPL National Priority List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing ICE ICE HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC UIC Listing UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WIP Well Investigation Program Case List MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES 277 GRANADA DR WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.094 mi.) K94 274 EPA ID:: CAD982501983 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that there are 12 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAES PARKER UHP COMP 4175 B SANTA FE RD ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) 56 178 EPA ID:: CAR000013474 ACCESSORY PRODUCTION 245 TANK FARM RD UNI WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J92 271 EPA ID:: CA0000240044 SAN LUIS STRUCK SERV 219 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P122 425 EPA ID:: CAD982496713 SAN LUIS OBISPO PAIN 225 TANK FARM ROAD ( WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P123 440 EPA ID:: CAL000403802 ENTEGRIS INC 4175 SANTA FE RD ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.165 mi.) U137 470 EPA ID:: CAD982504391 FEDEX FREIGHT SLO 250 BONETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) S151 509 EPA ID:: CAD982042061 FILBIN PROPERTY 4398 SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.213 mi.) AB174 618 EPA ID:: CAR000182220 OTIS AUTO BODY 3473 EMPRESA DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.) AC176 630 EPA ID:: CAD981386584 HIBSHMAN CORP 3563 EMPLEO ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) AD186 661 EPA ID:: CAD981627359 PACIFIC WEST CIRCUIT 189 GRANADA DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) AD187 664 EPA ID:: CAD981424443 STANTEC CONSULTING S 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE, NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.) AC199 697 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 EPA ID:: CAT080024268 RCRA-VSQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-VSQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-VSQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TRIBE AUTOMOTIVE 241 PRADO NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) AG208 719 EPA ID:: CAR000296756 Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE: Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. A review of the RESPONSE list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 RESPONSE site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.944 mi.) 243 955 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Facility Id: 60001343 Status: Active Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2021 has revealed that there are EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 13 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAES PUREGAS 4173 SANTA FE ROAD ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) F58 184 Facility Id: 60002343 Status: No Action Required S.L.O COUNTY FARM SU 675 TANK FARM RD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) L130 449 Facility Id: 40070003 Status: Refer: RWQCB JBL SCIENTIFIC 227 GRANADA WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.171 mi.) R147 497 Facility Id: 60002454 Status: No Action Required PACIFIC WEST CIRCUIT 189 GRANADA DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) AD187 664 Facility Id: 71002836 Status: No Further Action EG&G COATINGS 710 AEROVISTA PARKWA ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.371 mi.) 226 776 Facility Id: 60002455 Status: Refer: RWQCB B & B BODY SHOP INC 845 FIERO LN ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.377 mi.) 227 778 Facility Id: 60002344 Status: No Action Required CALIFORNIA COOPERAGE 870 INDUSTRIAL WAY ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.436 mi.) 230 826 Facility Id: 40250001 Status: Refer: RWQCB FORMER ELECTRONIC RE 990 INDUSTRIAL WAY ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.592 mi.) 237 892 Facility Id: 60002456 Status: No Action Required COUNTY OF SAN LUIS O 901 AIRPORT DR ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.632 mi.) 238 894 Facility Id: 80000759 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation NOLL INCORPORATED 390 BUCKLEY RD RR #3 SE 1/2 - 1 (0.756 mi.) 239 899 Facility Id: 60002303 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE 825 BUCKLEY ROAD SE 1/2 - 1 (0.812 mi.) 240 936 Facility Id: 60002304 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation BEDLO, INC 3045 DUNCAN NE 1/2 - 1 (0.876 mi.) 241 953 Facility Id: 40500002 Status: No Further Action PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.944 mi.) 243 955 Facility Id: 60001343 Status: Active EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste Management Board’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database. A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 SWF/LF sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HZIU KOMPOGAS SLO, I 4388 OLD SANTA FE SP SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q161 575 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 11/08/2021 Facility ID: 40-AA-0051 Operational Status: Active Regulation Status: Permitted FILBIN PROPERTY 4398 SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.213 mi.) AB174 618 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 11/08/2021 Facility ID: 40-AA-0041 Operational Status: Clean Closed Regulation Status: Unpermitted Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 9 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACI 4155 SANTA FE RD ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) F57 180 Database: LUST REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607900038 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global ID: T0607900038 ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H73 217 Database: LUST REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607900009 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global ID: T0607900009 SAN LUIS STRUCK SERV 219 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P122 425 Database: LUST REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Status: Preliminary site assessment workplan submitted Global ID: T0607985770 S.L.O COUNTY FARM SU 675 TANK FARM RD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) L130 449 Database: LUST REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607900004 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global ID: T0607900004 WINGS WEST AIRLINES, 835 AIRPORT DR ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.458 mi.) AK234 861 Database: LUST REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0607900123 WINGS WEST AIRLINES, 835 AIRPORT ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.458 mi.) AK235 865 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Global Id: T0607900123 Status: Completed - Case Closed UNITED PARCEL SERVIC 3601 SACRAMENTO ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.466 mi.) 236 871 Database: LUST REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607900066 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global ID: T0607900066 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Global Id: T0607956723 Global Id: T0607925011 Status: Completed - Case Closed J B DEWAR INC 75 PRADO RD NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.) AJ233 844 Database: LUST REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Global Id: T0607909561 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global ID: T0607909561 CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 8 CPS-SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES 277 GRANADA DR WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.094 mi.) K94 274 Database: SLIC REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: SLT3S1561326 UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TA TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.130 mi.) J113 400 Database: SLIC REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 20 Facility Status: Remedial Action Plan Underway/Ongoing UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TA TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.130 mi.) J114 401 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SL203031242 SAN LUIS STRUCK SERV 219 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P122 425 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0607985770 TANK FARM RD MTBE SO 202-275 TANK FARM RO WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z184 655 Database: SLIC REG 3, Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Facility Status: Preliminary Site Assessment Underway COWAN (FORMER SERAFI EAST PRADO ROAD NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) AG224 765 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T10000002348 EG&G COATINGS 710 AEROVISTA PARKWA ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.371 mi.) 226 776 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment Global Id: T10000010082 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FORMER MARTINELLI PR PRADO ROAD NW 0 - 1/8 (0.051 mi.) 69 212 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T10000001206 Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FEDEX FREIGHT SLO 250 BONETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) S151 509 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Id: 600125 KNECHT’S PLUMBING 3548 EMPLEO ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AD211 727 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Facility Id: 600014 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21 Facility Id: FA0002817 AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 10 AST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 635 TANK FARM E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H71 215 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H73 217 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Not reported 219 TANK FARM WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P124 443 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 SAN LUIS OBISPO READ 219B TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P125 443 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIO 254 GRANADA DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.153 mi.) R129 447 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Not reported 250 BONNETTI NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) S149 506 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 SAN LUIS GARBAGE COM 4388 OLD SANTA FE RO SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q156 534 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 VINTAGE AUTO BODY 3453 EMPRESA DR B NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) AC189 676 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Not reported 4349 SANTA FE SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) AE193 684 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 BUS & TRUCK SERVICE 241 PRADO RD UNIT B NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) AG209 723 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites CERS HAZ WASTE: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. A review of the CERS HAZ WASTE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/18/2021 has revealed that there are 29 CERS HAZ WASTE sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AM PAC REPAIR 4149 SANTA FE ST #8 ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) F54 169 ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H73 217 REEVES AUTOMOTIVE RE 235 TANK FARM #C WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J84 253 PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 251 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J89 262 SAN LUIS AMBULANCE 261 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J90 263 PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES 277 GRANADA DR WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.094 mi.) K94 274 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 22 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ACME AUTO BODY 645 TANK FARM RD #L E 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) H98 336 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTI 645 CLARION CT ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.125 mi.) N110 370 KOMPOGAS SLO LLC 4300 OLD SANTA FE RO SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.125 mi.) O111 389 XPO LOGISTICS FREIGH 219 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P127 444 FZIOMED INC 231 BONETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) S135 466 ENTEGRIS 4175 SANTA FE RD ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.165 mi.) U138 475 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY 224 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.170 mi.) P146 494 FEDEX FREIGHT WEST 250 BONNETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.) S153 520 SAN LUIS GARBAGE COM 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q158 554 JENIKE & JOHANSON, I 3485 EMPRESA NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) S166 598 ALLTECH SERVICES INC 202 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z180 644 TANK FARM RD MTBE SO 202-275 TANK FARM RO WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z184 655 VINTAGE AUTO BODY 3453 EMPRESA DR B NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) AC189 676 CA HIGHWAY PATROL CO 4115 BROAD STREET, S E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AH215 733 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD #B 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B25 86 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D39 104 CCM OFF ROAD AND PER 275 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B48 131 JEFFERIS AUTO BODY 269 TANK FARM ROAD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.004 mi.) B53 160 KEN’S BODY SHOP 4130 HORIZON LN #D SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) G60 187 SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION 225 SUBURBAN RD SW 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) I74 225 KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, I 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT SW 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) I103 348 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 SPICE HUNTER, THE 184 SUBURBAN RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.247 mi.) AI220 757 PFAS: A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database. A review of the PFAS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/06/2021 has revealed that there are 13 PFAS sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WELL 01, STANDBY ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.114 mi.) 105 354 WELL 02 SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.143 mi.) Q117 408 WELL 01 SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.174 mi.) V148 498 WELL 01 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) Z168 603 WELL 01 SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) V179 636 WELL 01 - STBY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.271 mi.) 225 768 WELL 01 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.408 mi.) 228 810 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WELL 01 SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.002 mi.) E52 152 WELL 01 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.039 mi.) 67 195 WELL 01 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.050 mi.) 68 204 WELL 01 SW 0 - 1/8 (0.081 mi.) 76 232 WELL 01 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.) 229 818 WELL 02 SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.442 mi.) 231 831 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ VIKING FREIGHT SYSTE 250 BONNETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) S150 507 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 54012 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 17407 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 9 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SPYGLASS ASSOCIATES 4115 SANTA FE ROAD ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.019 mi.) F64 192 Facility Id: 00000067721 SAN LUIS OBISPO 267 TANK FARM ROAD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J80 246 Facility Id: 00000046656 MAINO CONSTRUCTION C 265 TANK FARM ROAD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J83 252 Facility Id: 00000052038 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN 675 TANK FARM ROAD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) L131 454 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN 675 TANK FARM RD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) L132 462 Facility Id: 00000064556 FEDEX FREIGHT SLO 250 BONETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) S151 509 Facility Id: 00000054012 KENCHTS PLUMBING AND 3548 EMPLEO ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AD212 727 KNECHT’S PLUMBING & 3548 EMPLEO ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AD213 729 Facility Id: 00000063753 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 Facility Id: 00000006890 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 24 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 2 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FEDEX FREIGHT SLO 250 BONETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) S151 509 Facility Id: 40001798 Status: A PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 Facility Id: 40001484 Status: A CERS TANKS: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. A review of the CERS TANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/18/2021 has revealed that there are 4 CERS TANKS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H73 217 SAN LUIS OBISPO READ 219B TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P121 421 FEDEX FREIGHT WEST 250 BONNETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.) S153 520 SAN LUIS GARBAGE COM 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q158 554 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that there are 54 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AM PAC REPAIR 4149 SANTA FE ST UNI ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) F55 176 EPA ID:: CAL000230408 UNITED RENTALS INC # 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H70 213 EPA ID:: CAL000209710 ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J79 243 EPA ID:: CAL000448802 ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM ROAD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J81 247 EPA ID:: CAL000444012 ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J82 249 SAN LUIS AMBULANCE S 261 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J85 256 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 25 EPA ID:: CAL000351477 REEVES AUTOMOTIVE RE 235 TANK FARM RD UNI WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J88 259 EPA ID:: CAL000365722 SLO PERFORMANCE MARI 245 TANK FARM RD UNI WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J91 268 EPA ID:: CAL000420502 ACME AUTOBODY 645 TANK FARM RD STE E 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) H95 331 EPA ID:: CAL000377946 SLO SAIL AND CANVAS 645 TANK FARM RD. SU E 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) H96 333 ZONE 5 TECHNOLOGIES 3580 SUELDO ST 3580 WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) K99 337 DEL INDUSTRIES 3580 SUELDO STREET WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) K100 340 EPA ID:: CAC002965548 NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TF 660 TANK FARM RD. E 0 - 1/8 (0.112 mi.) L104 351 BOX KITE BARN YARD,I BEHIND 650 TANK FARM E 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) 107 362 EPA ID:: CAC002993694 SNIDER PRECISION, IN 648 CLARION CT ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.124 mi.) N108 365 EPA ID:: CAL000225300 SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTI 645 CLARION CT ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.125 mi.) N109 367 EPA ID:: CAL000267653 KOMPOGAS SLO LLC 4300 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.125 mi.) O112 397 EPA ID:: CAL000444766 CON WAY FREIGHT USM 219 A TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.) P116 405 EPA ID:: CAR000216465 FZIO MED INC 231 BONETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) S134 463 EPA ID:: CAL000289872 AEROCADEMY 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) T139 481 CUESTA AVIATION INC 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) T142 485 EPA ID:: CAL000357860 HELIPRO INC 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) T144 488 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN 224 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.170 mi.) P145 491 EPA ID:: CAL000298618 CB AND I INC 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q157 546 EPA ID:: CAD983592189 SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q160 573 EPA ID:: CAL000383568 JENIKE AND JOHANSON 3485 EMPRESA DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) S165 595 EPA ID:: CAP000203307 JENIKE & JOHANSON IN 3485 EMPRESA DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) S167 601 EPA ID:: CAL000060118 LUXURY LIGHTING LARR 712 FIERO LN ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) AA171 614 EPA ID:: CAP000165191 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFI 4378 OLD SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.) V177 632 EPA ID:: CAC003029412 C S S INC 202B TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z182 650 EPA ID:: CAD982495772 RENTAL DEPOT INC 202 TANK FARM RD STE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z183 653 EPA ID:: CAL000379575 WAGNERS IMPORT SERVI 202 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z185 659 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 26 EPA ID:: CAL000349934 VINTAGE AUTOBODY 3453 EMPRESA DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) AC190 680 EPA ID:: CAL000089495 HANGAR 46 AVIATION 4345 SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) AE194 684 EPA ID:: CAL000334615 IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USA 3474 EMPRESA DR STE NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.) AC195 687 EPA ID:: CAL000449800 KENNETH DUKES 179 GRANADA #4 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.236 mi.) 198 694 EPA ID:: CAD982029472 STANTEC CONSULTING S 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.) AC200 700 SANSONE COMPANY INC 710-21 FIERO LN ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) AA202 703 EPA ID:: CAL000234874 BLAIR ENGINEERING 710 FIERO LANE, #14 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) AA203 706 EPA ID:: CAC002979623 BLAIR ENGINEERING 710 FIERO LANE, #14 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) AA204 708 EPA ID:: CAL000441997 CRYSTAL ENGINEERING 708 FIERO LN STE 9 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.242 mi.) AA205 711 EPA ID:: CAL000390014 BUS & TRUCK SERVICE 241 PRADO RD # B NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) AG210 724 EPA ID:: CAL000392015 ABILITY CENTER 3548 EMPLEO ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AD214 730 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY P 4115 BROAD ST STE B- E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AH216 735 EPA ID:: CAL931023658 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBI 500 PRADO ROAD NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) AF223 763 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B24 84 EPA ID:: CAL000323759 CCM OFFROAD & PERFOR 275 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B26 90 EPA ID:: CAL000401523 FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D30 96 EPA ID:: CAL000425793 KASARJIAN TRADING CO 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D34 100 EPA ID:: CAL000397875 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD STE 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B46 128 EPA ID:: CAL000344716 WADE BROWN - JEFF WO 4130 HORIZON LN STE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) G59 185 EPA ID:: CAL000322480 INK SPOT 4110 HORIZON LN # F SW 0 - 1/8 (0.032 mi.) E66 193 EPA ID:: CAL000230189 ELECTRICRAFT, INC. 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SU SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.132 mi.) M115 402 EPA ID:: CAC003057228 THE SPICE HUNTER INC 184 SUBURBAN RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.247 mi.) AI221 759 EPA ID:: CAL000293171 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 27 US MINES: Mines Master Index File. The source of this database is the Dept. of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration. A review of the US MINES list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 US MINES site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CALPORTLAND CONSTRUC 219 TANK FARM RD. # WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P126 444 Database: US MINES, Date of Government Version: 11/02/2021 Mine ID:: 0403031 FINDS: The Facility Index System contains both facility information and "pointers" to other sources of information that contain more detail. These include: RCRIS; Permit Compliance System (PCS); Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS); FATES (FIFRA [Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act] and TSCA Enforcement System, FTTS [FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System]; CERCLIS; DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes); Federal Underground Injection Control (FURS); Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS); Surface Impoundments (SIA); TSCA Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS); PADS; RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers); TRIS; and TSCA. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA/NTIS. A review of the FINDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/04/2021 has revealed that there are 9 FINDS sites within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LOUIS OBISPO TOW 281 TANK FARM RD. 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D31 99 Registry ID:: 110064629763 CCM PRODUCTSNA INC 275 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B35 103 Registry ID:: 110066154468 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D36 103 Registry ID:: 110065190144 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM ROAD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D37 103 Registry ID:: 110070093750 KASARJIAN TRADING CO 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D38 104 Registry ID:: 110070418246 FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D41 118 Registry ID:: 110065574293 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD STE 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B42 119 Registry ID:: 110066552242 DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B43 119 Registry ID:: 110065625470 CCM OFFROAD & PERFOR 275 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B47 131 Registry ID:: 110070415934 ECHO: ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. A review of the ECHO list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/01/2022 has revealed that there are 7 ECHO sites within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 28 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LOUIS OBISPO TOW 281 TANK FARM RD. 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D31 99 Registry ID: 110064629763 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM ROAD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D37 103 Registry ID: 110070093750 KASARJIAN TRADING CO 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D38 104 Registry ID: 110070418246 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD STE 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B42 119 Registry ID: 110066552242 DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B43 119 Registry ID: 110065625470 CCM OFFROAD & PERFOR 275 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B47 131 Registry ID: 110070415934 FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D51 152 Registry ID: 110070590642 Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/16/2021 has revealed that there are 7 Cortese sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACI 4155 SANTA FE RD ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) F57 180 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H72 216 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED S.L.O COUNTY FARM SU 675 TANK FARM RD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) L130 449 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED WINGS WEST AIRLINES, 835 AIRPORT DR ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.458 mi.) AK234 861 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED UNITED PARCEL SERVIC 3601 SACRAMENTO ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.466 mi.) 236 871 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED J B DEWAR INC 75 PRADO RD NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.) AJ233 844 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 29 CUPA Listings: A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. A review of the CUPA Listings list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 80 CUPA Listings sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AM PAC REPAIR 4149 SANTA FE ST #8 ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) F54 169 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008908 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, exempt from billing Status: Active, billable ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H73 217 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002295 Facility Id: FA0009323 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable ELITE COLLISION REPA 251 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J77 240 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0013916 Status: Active, billable REEVES AUTOMOTIVE RE 235 TANK FARM RD UNI WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J78 241 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0007814 Status: Inactive, non-billable MAINO CONSTRUCTION C 265 TANK FARM ROAD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J83 252 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008234 Status: Inactive, non-billable REEVES AUTOMOTIVE RE 235 TANK FARM #C WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J84 253 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0009283 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable BOB HOLZER TOWING 235 TANK FARM RD #G WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J86 258 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0009516 Status: Inactive, non-billable ARNOLD & TODD INDUST 235 TANK FARM RD F WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J87 259 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0001539 Status: Inactive, non-billable PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 251 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J89 262 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008047 Status: Inactive, non-billable SAN LUIS AMBULANCE 261 TANK FARM RD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J90 263 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 30 Facility Id: FA0009284 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable PERFORMANCE MARINE 245 TANK FARM RD H WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) J93 273 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0010671 Facility Id: FA0012017 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES 277 GRANADA DR WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.094 mi.) K94 274 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005088 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable Status: Active, exempt from billing STAR AUTOMOTIVE - MO 645 TANK FARM #F E 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) H97 336 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0007392 Status: Inactive, non-billable ACME AUTO BODY 645 TANK FARM RD #L E 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) H98 336 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008235 Status: Active, billable SAN LUIS SOURDOUGH 3580 SUELDO ST/3877 WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.098 mi.) K101 342 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005369 Facility Id: FA0014755 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, 3563 SUELDO ST NW 0 - 1/8 (0.102 mi.) 102 347 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005161 Status: Inactive, non-billable SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTI 645 CLARION CT ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.125 mi.) N110 370 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008909 Status: Active, billable KOMPOGAS SLO LLC 4300 OLD SANTA FE RO SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.125 mi.) O111 389 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0014090 Status: Active, billable MCCARTHY STEEL 4330 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.146 mi.) O118 416 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012040 Status: Inactive, non-billable SAN LUIS OBISPO READ 219B TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P119 416 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002291 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable SAN LUIS OBISPO PAIN 225 TANK FARM RD STE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P120 417 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 31 Facility Id: FA0005149 Status: Inactive, non-billable SAN LUIS STRUCK SERV 219 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P122 425 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002292 Status: Inactive, non-billable XPO LOGISTICS FREIGH 219 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P127 444 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012412 Status: Active, billable GOT YOU COVER’D INC 211 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) P128 446 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0014753 Status: Active, billable LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIO 254 GRANADA DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.153 mi.) R129 447 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005078 Status: Inactive, non-billable SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN 675 TANK FARM ROAD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) L131 454 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0004674 Status: Inactive, non-billable FZIOMED INC 231 BONETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) S133 463 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0007453 Status: Active, billable HANGAR 46 4345 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.164 mi.) T136 470 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002288 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable ENTEGRIS 4175 SANTA FE RD ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.165 mi.) U138 475 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002286 Facility Id: FA0013606 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable HELIPRO INC 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) T140 483 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012362 Status: Active, billable SUNWEST AVIATION 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) T141 485 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012079 Status: Inactive, non-billable CUESTA AVIATION 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) T143 488 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012363 Status: Active, billable FARM SUPPLY COMPANY 224 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.170 mi.) P146 494 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 32 Facility Id: FA0006907 Status: Active, billable VIKING FREIGHT SYSTE 250 BONNETTI DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.) S150 507 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005187 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable VPA AUTO REPAIR 223 GRANADA DR A/B WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) R152 520 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005090 Status: Inactive, non-billable SANTA MARIA BREWING 675 CLARION CT ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) W154 525 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008543 Facility Id: FA0013970 Status: Inactive, non-billable LIQUID GRAVITY BREWI 675 CLARION CT ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) W155 529 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0014396 Status: Active, billable SAN LUIS GARBAGE COM 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q158 554 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0004396 Status: Active, billable Status: Inactive, non-billable SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.181 mi.) Q159 563 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0014736 Status: Active, billable MARTINON, JAVIER 215 MEISSNER LN WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.182 mi.) X162 578 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0006028 Status: Inactive, non-billable JENIKE & JOHANSON, I 3485 EMPRESA NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) S164 594 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005221 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable AIRGAS USA, LLC - NO 205 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) Z169 611 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0001765 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable BORDEN CNC FABRICATI 203 GRANADA DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) X170 612 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005223 Status: Inactive, non-billable ALL ABOUT PRODUCE 712 FIERO LN ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) AA172 617 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005543 Status: Inactive, non-billable LUXURY LIGHTING 712 FIERO LN 28 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) AA173 618 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 33 Facility Id: FA0005259 Status: Inactive, non-billable FILBIN ILLEGAL LANDF 4398 SANTE FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.213 mi.) AB175 629 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0007273 Status: Inactive, non-billable CB & I CONSTRUCTORS, 4388 SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) AB178 635 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002287 Status: Inactive, non-billable ALLTECH SERVICES INC 202 TANK FARM RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z180 644 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002347 Status: Inactive, non-billable WAGNERS IMPORT SERVI 202 TANK FARM RD STE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z181 650 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008328 Status: Active, billable TANK FARM RD MTBE SO 202-275 TANK FARM RO WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) Z184 655 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008966 Status: Active, billable PACIFIC WEST CIRCUIT 189 GRANADA DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) AD188 670 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005092 Status: Inactive, non-billable VINTAGE AUTO BODY 3453 EMPRESA DR B NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) AC189 676 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005105 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable SAN LUIS JET CENTER 4349 SANTA FE RD HG- SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) AE192 683 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0001757 Status: Inactive, non-billable OTIS AUTO BODY 3474 EMPRESA DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.) AC196 689 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005114 Status: Inactive, non-billable CENTRAL COAST LANDSC 445 PRADO ROAD N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) AF197 690 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0004299 Status: Inactive, non-billable TIM’S CONCRETE PUMPI 277 PRADO RD NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.239 mi.) AG201 702 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005159 Status: Inactive, non-billable CRYSTAL ENGINEERING 708 FIERO LANE STE 9 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.242 mi.) AA206 713 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0009410 Status: Active, billable TRIBE AUTO 241 PRADO RD NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) AG207 717 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 34 Facility Id: FA0014188 Status: Active, exempt from billing Status: Active, billable BUS & TRUCK SERVICE 241 PRADO RD UNIT B NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) AG209 723 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005952 Status: Inactive, non-billable KNECHT’S PLUMBING & 3548 EMPLEO ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AD213 729 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005520 Status: Inactive, non-billable CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY P 4115 BROAD ST STE B- E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AH217 738 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0006894 Status: Active, exempt from billing SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR 3534 EMPLEO STE B WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) AD218 743 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005150 Status: Inactive, non-billable ALLTEC INTERGARATED 4330 B SANTA FE RD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.247 mi.) AE219 746 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012041 Status: Inactive, non-billable PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD #B 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B25 86 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0000736 Status: Active, exempt from billing Status: Active, billable FINISHMASTER BRANCH 277 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D32 99 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0009278 Status: Inactive, non-billable SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D39 104 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002294 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B45 120 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002293 Status: Inactive, non-billable CCM OFF ROAD AND PER 275 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B48 131 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0007401 Status: Active, exempt from billing Status: Active, billable JEFFERIS AUTO BODY 269 TANK FARM ROAD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.004 mi.) B53 160 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 35 Facility Id: FA0006093 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable SAN LUIS AMBULANCE S 4130 HORIZON LN #B SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) G61 189 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0007203 Status: Inactive, non-billable KEN’S BODY SHOP 4130 HORIZON LN #D SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) G62 189 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0007202 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable JEFFERIS AUTO BODY 4130 HORIZON #C SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) G63 190 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0006596 Status: Inactive, non-billable CLOUD COMPANY, INC 4120 HORIZON LN #A SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.021 mi.) E65 193 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008919 Status: Inactive, non-billable SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION 225 SUBURBAN RD SW 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) I74 225 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002290 Facility Id: FA0012857 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable INDEPENDENT RACE SHO 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT SW 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) I75 231 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0005404 Facility Id: FA0011810 Status: Inactive, non-billable KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, I 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT SW 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) I103 348 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0008228 Status: Active, exempt from billing Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable TRIPLETT HARPS 220 SUBURBAN RD STE SW 0 - 1/8 (0.114 mi.) M106 362 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0009623 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 196 SUBURBAN ROAD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) Y163 579 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0002817 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable ART’S CYCLERY 181 SUBURBAN RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) Y191 683 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Facility Id: FA0012731 Status: Inactive, non-billable SPICE HUNTER, THE 184 SUBURBAN RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.247 mi.) AI222 762 Database: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO, Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 36 Facility Id: FA0005125 Status: Inactive, non-billable Status: Active, billable EMI: Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies A review of the EMI list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2019 has revealed that there is 1 EMI site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D39 104 Facility Id: 2883 HAZNET: The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000-500,000 shipments. Data from non-California manifests & continuation sheets are not included at the present time. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, & disposal method. The source is the Department of Toxic Substance Control is the agency. This database begins with calendar year 1993. A review of the HAZNET list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2019 has revealed that there are 4 HAZNET sites within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD STE 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B27 92 GEPAID: CAL000344716 DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B45 120 GEPAID: CAL000323759 D’ANGELOS & SONS INC 277 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D49 136 GEPAID: CAL000346245 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D50 142 GEPAID: CAL000208475 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 4 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACI 4155 SANTA FE RD ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) F57 180 Reg Id: 2055 ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RE 635 TANK FARM RD E 0 - 1/8 (0.061 mi.) H73 217 Reg Id: 1057 S.L.O COUNTY FARM SU 675 TANK FARM RD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) L130 449 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 37 Reg Id: 103 WINGS WEST AIRLINES, 835 AIRPORT ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.458 mi.) AK235 865 Reg Id: 407 HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/15/2021 has revealed that there is 1 HWP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DIAMOND OIL SERVICE 75 A PRADO RD NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.) AJ232 839 EPA ID: CAD981370539 Cleanup Status: CLOSED MINES: A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. A review of the MINES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/06/2021 has revealed that there is 1 MINES site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BRUGHELLI PIT 547 PRADO ROAD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) C40 118 NPDES: A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. A review of the NPDES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/09/2021 has revealed that there is 1 NPDES site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D39 104 Facility Status: Active Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/13/2021 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ NORTH CALLE JOAQUIN DENNY’S AND BOB’S W 1/2 - 1 (0.926 mi.) 242 955 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 38 WDS: California Water Resources Control Board - Waste Discharge System. A review of the WDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/19/2007 has revealed that there is 1 WDS site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D39 104 Facility Status: A Facility Id: 3 40I009977 WDR: In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. A review of the WDR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/06/2021 has revealed that there is 1 WDR site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B45 120 CIWQS: The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. A review of the CIWQS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/30/2021 has revealed that there are 3 CIWQS sites within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 34015WQ06 SLO TANK F 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A28 95 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D39 104 DYER’S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B45 120 CERS: The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials A review of the CERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/18/2021 has revealed that there are 5 CERS sites within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ 34015WQ06 SLO TANK F 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) A33 100 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE 273 TANK FARM RD #B 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B25 86 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 39 PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressLowerElevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAG 281 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) D39 104 VALOR WINE CO., LLC 271 TANK FARM 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B44 120 CCM OFF ROAD AND PER 275 TANK FARM RD 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) B48 131 MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System A review of the MINES MRDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/06/2018 has revealed that there is 1 MINES MRDS site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property. PageMapIDDirection / DistanceAddressEqual/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GRAVEL PIT 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) C29 95 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6926581.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 40 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ TREATMENT PLANT ENVIROSTOR SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK DISPOSAL SIT ENVIROSTOR HENDERSON PETROLEUM ENVIROSTOR EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 016040 644 006 0360320 5 24 00 360 3204 40 360400560520480440400 400 52 0 36036 520480440400400360360360 203 203203 2 0 320320 280 2 8 0 280280 2005204804 40400360320280280 2 8 0 1 2 0 120160160160160 1 6 0240200200200200 2 0 0 20 0 200 2 4 0 240 24024 0 2 4 0 240 2 00 240 2 0 0 200120120120 120120200200200 240 2402 4 0 240200 24020028 024020 02002002 00 200 2 0 0 2404 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 200 200 2 00 2 0 0 0020016032 4 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 60 16 0 160160 160 1 6 0 16 0 1601 6 0 160 1 6 0 1 60160 16 0120 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 201 2 0 120 1201 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 4 40 4 0 0 3 2 0 280 2002 80 1 6 0 160 2402002 4 0 200 160 160120 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites 0NR00001.000NPL 0NR00001.000ProposedNPL 0NR00001.000NPLLIENS Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites 0NR00001.000DelistedNPL Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders 0NRNR0000.500FEDERALFACILITY 0NRNR0000.500SEMS Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP 0NRNR0000.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action 0NR00001.000CORRACTS Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities 0NRNR0000.500RCRA-TSDF Lists of Federal RCRA generators 1NRNRNR010.250RCRA-LQG 13NRNRNR1020.2501RCRA-SQG 1NRNRNR100.250RCRA-VSQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0NRNR0000.500LUCIS 0NRNR0000.500USENGCONTROLS 0NRNR0000.500USINSTCONTROLS Federal ERNS list 7NRNRNRNR00.0017ERNS Lists of state- and tribal Superfund) equivalent sites 1NR10001.000RESPONSE Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities 13NR63311.000ENVIROSTOR Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities 2NRNR0200.500SWF/LF TC6926581.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks 9NRNR4320.500LUST 0NRNR0000.500INDIANLUST 10NRNR2420.5002CPS-SLIC Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks 0NRNRNR000.250FEMAUST 3NRNRNR300.250UST 10NRNRNR820.250AST 0NRNRNR000.250INDIANUST Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0NRNR0000.500INDIANVCP 0NRNR0000.500VCP Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites 0NRNR0000.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0NRNR0000.500USBROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0NRNR0000.500WMUDS/SWAT 0NRNR0000.500SWRCY 0NRNRNRNR00.001HAULERS 0NRNR0000.500INDIANODI 0NRNR0000.500ODI 0NRNR0000.500DEBRISREGION9 0NRNR0000.500IHSOPENDUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0NRNRNRNR00.001USHISTCDL 0NR00001.000HISTCal-Sites 0NRNRNR000.250SCH 0NRNRNRNR00.001CDL 0NR00001.000ToxicPits 29NRNRNR14150.250CERSHAZWASTE 0NRNRNRNR00.001USCDL 0NRNRNRNRNRTPAQUEOUSFOAM 13NRNR4450.500PFAS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 2NRNRNR200.250SWEEPSUST 9NRNRNR630.250HISTUST 2NRNRNR200.250CAFIDUST TC6926581.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 4NRNRNR310.250CERSTANKS Local Land Records 0NRNRNRNR00.001LIENS 0NRNRNRNR00.001LIENS2 1NRNR0000.5001DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0NRNRNRNR00.001HMIRS 6NRNRNRNR00.0016CHMIRS 0NRNRNRNR00.001LDS 0NRNRNRNR00.001MCS 0NRNRNRNR00.001SPILLS90 Other Ascertainable Records 54NRNRNR31230.250RCRANonGen / NLR 0NR00001.000FUDS 0NR00001.000DOD 0NRNR0000.500SCRDDRYCLEANERS 0NRNRNRNR00.001USFINASSUR 0NRNRNRNR00.001EPAWATCHLIST 0NRNRNR000.2502020CORACTION 0NRNRNRNR00.001TSCA 0NRNRNRNR00.001TRIS 0NRNRNRNR00.001SSTS 0NR00001.000ROD 0NRNRNRNR00.001RMP 0NRNRNRNR00.001RAATS 0NRNRNRNR00.001PRP 0NRNRNRNR00.001PADS 0NRNRNRNR00.001ICIS 0NRNRNRNR00.001FTTS 0NRNRNRNR00.001MLTS 0NRNRNRNR00.001COALASHDOE 0NRNR0000.500COALASHEPA 0NRNRNRNR00.001PCBTRANSFORMER 0NRNRNRNR00.001RADINFO 0NRNRNRNR00.001HISTFTTS 0NRNRNRNR00.001DOTOPS 0NR00001.000CONSENT 0NR00001.000INDIANRESERV 0NR00001.000FUSRAP 0NRNR0000.500UMTRA 0NRNRNRNR00.001LEADSMELTERS 0NRNRNRNR00.001USAIRS 1NRNRNR100.250USMINES 0NRNRNR000.250ABANDONEDMINES 11NRNRNRNR90.0012FINDS 0NRNRNRNR00.001DOCKETHWC 0NR00001.000UXO 8NRNRNRNR70.0011ECHO TC6926581.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0NRNRNR000.250FUELSPROGRAM 0NR00001.000CABONDEXP. PLAN 7NRNR3220.500Cortese 81NRNRNR49310.2501CUPAListings 0NRNRNR000.250DRYCLEANERS 3NRNRNRNR10.0012EMI 0NRNRNRNR00.001ENF 0NRNRNRNR00.001FinancialAssurance 6NRNRNRNR40.0012HAZNET 0NRNRNRNR00.001ICE 4NRNR1120.500HISTCORTESE 1NR01001.000HWP 0NRNRNR000.250HWT 1NRNRNR010.250MINES 0NRNRNR000.250MWMP 2NRNRNRNR10.0011NPDES 0NRNRNRNR00.001PESTLIC 0NRNR0000.500PROC 1NR10001.000Notify65 0NRNRNRNR00.001UIC 0NRNRNRNR00.001UICGEO 0NRNR0000.500WASTEWATERPITS 1NRNRNRNR10.001WDS 0NRNRNR000.250WIP 0NRNRNRNR00.001MILITARYPRIVSITES 0NRNRNRNR00.001PROJECT 1NRNRNRNR10.001WDR 5NRNRNRNR30.0012CIWQS 9NRNRNRNR50.0014CERS 0NRNRNRNR00.001NON-CASE INFO 0NRNRNRNR00.001OTHEROILGAS 0NRNRNRNR00.001PRODWATERPONDS 0NRNRNRNR00.001SAMPLINGPOINT 0NRNRNRNR00.001WELLSTIMPROJ 2NRNRNRNRNRTP2HWTS 1NRNRNRNR10.001MINESMRDS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0NR00001.000EDRMGP 1NRNRNRNR00.1251EDRHistAuto 0NRNRNRNR00.125EDRHistCleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0NRNRNRNR00.001RGALF 1NRNRNRNR00.0011RGALUST 337081814912636- Totals -- TC6926581.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC6926581.2s Page 8 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Chevron Environmental Management Company San LuisObispoEntityName: Owner andOperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CIWQS,Eval Source: SLICEvalProgram: WaterBoardsEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: RWQCB Type B complianceinspectionEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-18-1998EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Tanks & Ground Water CleanUpCERSDescription: 262905CERSID: 435899SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANKFARMAddress: FORMER CHEVRON SAN LUIS OBISPO TANKFARMName: CERS: Site 1 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM N/A A1 CERSFORMERCHEVRONSANLUISOBISPOTANKFARM S121785169 1999Year: 0.25Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAD982444481TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1999Year: 2112 CARPENTER CANYONRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055430280Telephone: JOHNRYANContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 438 TANK FARMRDAddress: SLOCORECYCLESName: HAZNET: Site 2 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 Target CIWQS438TANKFARMRD N/A A2 HAZNETSLOCORECYCLES S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 9 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAL000123867Gepaid: 1997Year: 0.4587Tons: T01 - Treatment, TankDisposalMethod: 122 - Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5CAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1998Year: 0.102Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: CAT080013352TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1998Year: 0.1Tons: Disposal Method: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAD982444481TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1998Year: 0.125Tons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1998Year: 0.2Tons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1999Year: 0.1Tons: T01 - Treatment, TankDisposalMethod: 222 - Oil/water separationsludgeCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1999Year: 0.04Tons: Disposal Method: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: AZD980813022TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: 1999Year: 0.25Tons: Disposal Method: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: AZD980813022TSDEPAID: CAL000123867Gepaid: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 10 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.417QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008252405TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008252405TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675896TransEPAID: 93016052ManifestID: 19940901ReceiptDate: 3/26/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19940819ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 70WasteQuantity: 0.2919QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 461 - PaintsludgeWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008252405TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008252405TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675896TransEPAID: 92021658ManifestID: 19941214ReceiptDate: 3/28/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19941206ShipmentDate: CAL000123867GenEPAID: 1994Year: Additional Info: 4 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 0.374Tons: Disposal Method: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD980673842TSDEPAID: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 11 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19990722ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 0.2QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98781080ManifestID: 19991007ReceiptDate: 11/19/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990914ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: T01 - Treatment, TankMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 222 - Oil/water separationsludgeWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98781080ManifestID: 19991007ReceiptDate: 11/19/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990914ShipmentDate: CAL000123867GenEPAID: 1999Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 12 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTransName: CAD982444481TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 96180323ManifestID: 19990330ReceiptDate: 5/20/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990326ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 500WasteQuantity: 0.25QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: AZD980813022TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAL000124112Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98780972ManifestID: 19990805ReceiptDate: 2/15/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990722ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 80WasteQuantity: 0.04QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: AZD980813022TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAL000124112Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98780972ManifestID: 19990805ReceiptDate: 2/15/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 13 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98064236ManifestID: 19981211ReceiptDate: 2/2/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19981125ShipmentDate: CAL000123867GenEPAID: 1998Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980673842TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 96770168ManifestID: 19971010ReceiptDate: 7/23/1998 0:00:00CreationDate: 19971002ShipmentDate: CAL000123867GenEPAID: 1997Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 500WasteQuantity: 0.25QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982444481TSDFAltEPAID: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 14 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.102QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT080013352TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98064066ManifestID: 19981022ReceiptDate: 12/10/1998 0:00:00CreationDate: 19981013ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 250WasteQuantity: 0.125QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: WAD991281767TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98064236ManifestID: 19981211ReceiptDate: 2/2/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19981125ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.4587QuantityTons: T01 - Treatment, TankMethCode: D002RCRACode: 122 - Alkaline solution without metals (pH > 12.5WasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: WAD991281767TSDFAltEPAID: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 15 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 50WasteQuantity: 0.2085QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 291 - LatexwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008252405TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675896TransEPAID: 95262432ManifestID: 19950705ReceiptDate: 11/13/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19950621ShipmentDate: CAL000123867GenEPAID: 1995Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982444481TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982444481TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98064117ManifestID: 19981020ReceiptDate: 12/10/1998 0:00:00CreationDate: 19981013ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 16 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAddress2: 438 TANK FARMRDAddress: SLOCORECYCLESName: HWTS: 120.64902Longitude: 35.24682Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: 05/08/2001TerminationDate: 03/16/1992EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I000611WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 5093SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Scrap and WasteMaterialsPlace/Project Type: PO Box 1268, San Luis Obispo, CA93406AgencyAddress: San Luis GarbageCoAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 438 TANK FARMRDAddress: SLOCORECYCLESName: CIWQS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 50WasteQuantity: 0.2085QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 461 - PaintsludgeWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008252405TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675896TransEPAID: 95262432ManifestID: 19950705ReceiptDate: 11/13/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19950621ShipmentDate: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 TC6926581.2s Page 17 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934060000City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: INACTIVE PER VQ00 - BMIContactAddress: JOHNRYANContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 438 TANK FARMRDOwnerAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 2112 CARPENTER CANYONRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 01/22/2001LastActDate: 08/08/1994CreateDate: 06/30/2000InactiveDate: CAL000123867EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: SLOCO RECYCLES (Continued)S113069833 YESWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: 09:40:14AMOESTime: 3/30/1995OESDate: NotreportedOESnotification: 07608OESIncidentNumber: CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARM ROAD SAN LOUISOPISBOAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: Site 3 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SLO, CA 93401 Target EMI276TANKFARMROAD N/A A3 CHMIRSUNOCAL S105641106 TC6926581.2s Page 18 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 18ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 21TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 5171SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 28FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1987Year: SLO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNOCALName: EMI: water monitoring wells overflowed due to risingstormDescription: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: NONumberofFatalities: NONumberofInjuries: NOEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: crudeoilSubstance: NotreportedEDate: O/FSiteType: YESContained: 20galsAmount: NotreportedAdminAgency: 0900/30mar95IncidentDate: unocalAgency: 1995Year: NotreportedDate/Time: NotreportedOther: NotreportedMeasure: PETROLEUMType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: unocalCleanupBy: NotreportedSpillSite: ditch runs into san louis opisbocreekWaterway: UNOCAL (Continued)S105641106 TC6926581.2s Page 19 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 18ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 21TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 5171SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 28FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1990Year: SLO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNOCALName: UNOCAL (Continued)S105641106 NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: CHEVRON USAINCOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: CHEVRON USAINCOwnerName: SAN RAMON, CA94583MailingCity,State,Zip: PO BOX6004MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: WASTETECHContactTitle: NAWTDESK@CHEVRON.COMContactEmail: 866-849-4435ContactFax: 877-386-6044ContactTelephone: SAN RAMON, CA94583ContactCity,State,Zip: PO BOX6004ContactAddress: JOCKORODRIGUEZContactName: CAR000054825EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: ABNU0002 SLO TANKFARMHandlerName: 20200819DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: Site 4 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM RD CAR000054825 A4 RCRA-SQGABNU0002SLOTANKFARM 1001492802 TC6926581.2s Page 20 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotDefinedWasteDescription: D000WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20200826HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)1001492802 TC6926581.2s Page 21 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20050801DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: JOCKORODRIGUEZOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20050901DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CHEVRON USAINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 310-726-7768Owner/Operator Telephone: EL SEGUNDO, CA90245Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2142 ROSECRANSAVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: UNOCAL OIL CO OFCALOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 877-386-6044Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN RAMON, CA94583Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX6004Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20050801DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CHEVRON USAINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: BENZENEWasteDescription: D018WasteCode: LEADWasteDescription: D008WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)1001492802 TC6926581.2s Page 22 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FORMER UNOCAL306611HandlerName: 20090806ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: UNOCAL S L O TANKFARMHandlerName: 19990723ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 877-386-6044Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN RAMON, CA94583Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX6004Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20050801DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CHEVRON USAINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 877-386-6044Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN RAMON, CA94583Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX6004Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20050801DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CHEVRON USAINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN RAMON, CA94583Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX6004Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20050901DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CHEVRON USAINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)1001492802 TC6926581.2s Page 23 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: REMEDIATIONSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56291NAICSCode: GASOLINE STATIONS WITH CONVENIENCESTORESNAICSDescription: 44711NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ABNU0002 SLO TANKFARMHandlerName: 20200819ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ABNU0002 SLO TANKFARMHandlerName: 20130807ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued) 1001492802 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARM ROAD, SITE: CHEVRON TANK FARMPROPERTYAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: Site 5 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM ROAD, SITE: CHEVRON TANK FARM PROPERTY N/A A5 CHMIRS S110419228 TC6926581.2s Page 24 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: 0NumberofFatalities: 0NumberofInjuries: 0Evacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: 130QuantityReleased: Contaminated Water w/ trace amounts ofHydrocarbonSubstance: NotreportedEDate: NotreportedSiteType: YesContained: NotreportedAmount: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentAdminAgency: 9/15/2008IncidentDate: City of San LuisObispoAgency: 2008Year: 0700Date/Time: NotreportedOther: Gal(s)Measure: NotreportedType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: No clean up needed, substance in native soil.Cleanup By: OtherSpillSite: NotreportedWaterway: NoWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: NotreportedOESTime: NotreportedOESDate: 09/15/2008OESnotification: 08-6748OESIncidentNumber: Continued)S110419228 TC6926581.2s Page 25 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation states is not a waterway or shell fish area. went into a dry Ferry Shrimp habitat that caller to pump running against closed valve. Substance Caller states a de-watering pipeline leakeddueDescription: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Continued)S110419228 Gasoline ServiceStations2011CHEVRONCOMPANIES Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto Site 6 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM RD N/A A6 EDR HistAutoCHEVRONCOMPANIES 1022200983 50CountyCode: 2009Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCAName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIEDAPCDAirDistrictName: 4612SICCode: SJUAirDistrictName: 11214FacilityID: SJVAirBasin: 50CountyCode: 2008Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCAName: EMI: Site 7 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 Target CERS276TANKFARMROAD N/A A7 EMIUNIONOILCOMPANYOFCA S110503796 TC6926581.2s Page 26 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCAName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIEDAPCDAirDistrictName: 4612SICCode: SJUAirDistrictName: 11214FacilityID: SJVAirBasin: 50CountyCode: 2011Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCAName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIEDAPCDAirDistrictName: 4612SICCode: SJUAirDistrictName: 11214FacilityID: SJVAirBasin: 50CountyCode: 2010Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCAName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIEDAPCDAirDistrictName: 4612SICCode: SJUAirDistrictName: 11214FacilityID: SJVAirBasin: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CA (Continued)S110503796 TC6926581.2s Page 27 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SANRAMONAffiliationCity: POBOX6004AffiliationAddress: WASTETECHEntityTitle: JOCKORODRIGUEZEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110013912597CERSID: 501077SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7508City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCAName: CERS: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIEDAPCDAirDistrictName: 4612SICCode: SJUAirDistrictName: 11214FacilityID: SJVAirBasin: 50CountyCode: 2012Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CA (Continued) S110503796 and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110013912597RegistryID: FINDS: Site 8 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target ECHO276TANKFARMROAD N/A A8 FINDSUNIONOILCOMPANYOFCA 1016079768 TC6926581.2s Page 28 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCAName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110013912597DFRURL: 110013912597RegistryID: 1016079768Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access RISK AND TECHNOLOGY REVIEW HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT MAJOR corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and UNION OIL COMPANY OF CA (Continued) 1016079768 NotreportedSpillSite: NotreportedWaterway: NotreportedWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: 08:01:39AMOESTime: 6/3/1995OESDate: NotreportedOESnotification: 08533OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARM RD AT UNOCALFACILITYAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: Site 9 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA Target 276 TANK FARM RD AT UNOCAL FACILITY N/A A9 CHMIRS S105640229 TC6926581.2s Page 29 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 5’ sheen from a spot of oily soil 3’ in diameter.Description: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: NONumberofFatalities: NONumberofInjuries: NOEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: crude oilsheenSubstance: NotreportedEDate: OTHERSiteType: NOContained: sheenAmount: NotreportedAdminAgency: 170002JUN95IncidentDate: unocalAgency: 1995Year: NotreportedDate/Time: NotreportedOther: NotreportedMeasure: PETROLEUMType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: unocalCleanupBy: Continued)S105640229 NotreportedDirectionFromCity: NotreportedDistanceUnits: NotreportedDistanceFromCity: 93401LocationZip: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationCounty: CALocationState: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationNearestCity: NotreportedLocationStreet2: NotreportedLocationStreet1: 276 TANKFARMRDLoactionAddress: NotreportedIncidentLocation: DISCOVEREDIncidentDTG: 1995-03-30 09:00:00IncidentDateTime: NATURALPHENOMENONIncidentCause: FIXEDTypeofIncident: MONITORING WELLS OVERFLOWED DUE TO HEAVYRAINSDescriptionofIncident: 285034NRCReport #: Incident Commons: Site 10 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANKFARM RD N/A A10 ERNS 95285034 TC6926581.2s Page 30 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPlatformRigName: NotreportedActualAmountUnits: NotreportedActualAmount: NotreportedCapacityofTankUnits: NotreportedCapacityofTank: NotreportedTankID: NotreportedTankRegulatedBy: UTankRegulated: UTransportableContainer: ABOVETankAboveGround: NotreportedDescriptionofTank: NBrakeFailure: NotreportedDOTCrossingNumber: YDeviceOperational: NotreportedCrossingDeviceType: UNKNOWNTypeVehicleInvolved: UNKNOWNRailroadMilepost: NotreportedLocationSubdivision: NGradeCrossing: NRailroadHotline: UPipelineCovered: UExposedUnderwater: ABOVEPipelineAboveGround: UDOTRegulated: UNKNOWNPipelineType: UNPDESCompliance: NotreportedNPDES: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedGeneratingCapacity: UPowerGeneratingFacility: UNKNOWNTypeofFixedObject: NotreportedBuildingID: NotreportedRoadMileMarker: NotreportedAircraftRunwayNumber: NotreportedAircraftHanger: NotreportedAircraftSpotNumber: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoardUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoard: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacityUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacity: NotreportedAircraftID: NotreportedAircraftModel: UNKNOWNAircraftType: 285034NRCReport #: Incidents: NotreportedPotentialRange: NotreportedLocationrange: NotreportedLocationTownship: NotreportedLocationSection: NotreportedLongQuad: NotreportedLongSec: NotreportedLongMin: NotreportedLongDeg: NotreportedLatQuad: NotreportedLatSec: NotreportedLatMin: NotreportedLatDeg: Continued)95285034 TC6926581.2s Page 31 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAirCorridorDesc: NAirCorridorClosed: NotreportedDamageAmount: NAnyDamages: NotreportedNumberFatalities: UAnyFatalities: NotreportedNumberHospitalized: NotreportedNumberInjured: UAnyInjuries: NotreportedRadiusofEvacuation: NotreportedWhoEvacuated: NotreportedNumberEvacuated: NAnyEvacuations: UFireExtinguished: NFireInvolved: 285034NRCReport #: Incident Details: XXXPassengerDelay: XXXPassengerRoute: NotreportedPassengerHandling: NotreportedUnknownTesting: NotreportedOtherEmployeeTesting: NotreportedSignalmanTesting: NotreportedTrainDispatcherTesting: NotreportedBrakemanTesting: NotreportedRCLOperatorTesting: NotreportedYardForemanTesting: NotreportedTrainmanTesting: NotreportedEngineerTesting: NotreportedConductorTesting: XXXSubPartCTestingReq: NotreportedFBIContactDateTime: NotreportedFBIContact: NotreportedCRChangeDate: NotreportedCREndDate: NotreportedCRBeginDate: NotreportedTransitBusFlag: NotreportedServiceDisruptionUnits: NotreportedServiceDisruptionTime: NotreportedDateTiemNormalService: NotreportedAirbagDeployed: YStructureOperational: NotreportedStructureName: NotreportedTypeofStructure: NAllision: NotreportedContinuousReleasePermit: NotreportedInitialContinuousReleaseNo: NotreportedContinuousReleaseType: NotreportedBerthSlipNumber: NotreportedPierDockNumber: NotreportedStateLeaseNumber: NotreportedOCSPNumber: NotreportedOCSGNumber: NotreportedLocationBlockID: NotreportedLocationAreaID: NotreportedPlatformLetter: Continued)95285034 TC6926581.2s Page 32 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSheenSizeWidthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeWidth: NotreportedSheenSizeLengthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeLength: NotreportednearestRiverMileMarker: NotreportedFederalAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyNotified: WILL NOTIFY:EPA/HEALTHDEPTAdditionalInfo: NotreportedSheenSizeUnits: NotreportedTrackCLosureUnits: NotreportedRoadClosureUnits: NotreportedCurrentSpeedUnit: NotreportedOccupantFatality: NotreportedPassengerInjuries: NotreportedEmployeeInjuries: NotreportedWindSpeedUnit: NCommunityImpact: NotreportedPassFatality: NotreportedEmplFatality: NotreportedTrackCloseDir: NotreportedWaterTemperature: NotreportedCurrentDirection: NotreportedCurrentSpeed: NotreportedWaveCondition: NotreportedSheenOdorDescription: NotreportedDirectionofSheenTravel: NotreportedSheenColor: NotreportedSheenSize: UWaterSupplyContaminated: NotreportedWindDirection: NotreportedWindSpeed: NotreportedAirTemperature: NotreportedWeatherConditions: NotreportedOtherAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyReportNumber: NotreportedStateAgencyonScene: BOOMED OFF/THE WELLS ARE BEINGCAPPEDDescRemedialAction: NotreportedReleaserate: NotreportedEstimatedDurationofRelease: UReleaseSecured: NotreportedTributaryof: NotreportedBodyofWater: SOILAdditionalMediumInfo: LANDMediumDesc: NotreportedMediaInterest: NotreportedTrackClosureTime: NotreportedTrackDesc: NTrackClosed: NMajorArtery: NotreportedClosureDirection: NotreportedRoadClosureTime: NotreportedRoadDesc: NRoadClosed: NotreportedWaterwayClosureTime: NotreportedWaterwayDesc: NWaterwayClosed: NotreportedAirClosureTime: Continued)95285034 TC6926581.2s Page 33 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NONEUnitofMeasureReachWater: 0AmountinWater: YESIfReachedWater: OIL: CRUDENameofMaterial: GALLON(S)Unit of Measure: 20AmountofMaterial: NotreportedUNNumber: NotreportedCaseNumber: OILChrisCode: 285034NRCReport #: Material Involved: UNAVAILABLESource: NotreportedOnBehalf: 93401ResponsibleZip: CAResponsibleState: SAN LUISOBISPOResponsibleCity: PRIVATEENTERPRISEResponsibleOrgType: UNOCALResponsibleCompany: INCCallType: 1995-03-30 12:27:39DateTimeComplete: 1995-03-30 12:23:19DateTimeReceived: 95285034SiteID: 285034NRCReport #: Calls: UNKPassengersTransferred: NotreportedReleaseRateRate: NotreportedReleaseRateUnit: NotreportedDurationUnit: NOffshore: Continued)95285034 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL TANK FARMFACILITYName: 1994 UNOCAL TANK FARM FACILITY 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUISOBISPOState: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL TANK FARMFACILITYName: 1995 UNOCAL TANK FARM FACILITY 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUISOBISPOState: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL TANK FARMFACILITYName: 1996 UNOCAL TANK FARM FACILITY 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUISOBISPOState: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL TANK FARMFACILITYName: RGA LUST: Site 11 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA Target 276 TANK FARM RD N/A A11 RGALUSTUNOCALTANKFARMFACILITY S114714034 TC6926581.2s Page 34 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1993 UNOCAL TANK FARM FACILITY 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUISOBISPOState: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: UNOCAL TANK FARM FACILITY (Continued) S114714034 NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: NotreportedOESTime: NotreportedOESDate: 08/23/2012OESnotification: 12-5022OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: 2030100PCA: NoCaseTypeOtherGrndWtr: YesCaseTypeDrinkingWaterAqfr: NoCaseTypeDrinkinWaterWell: YesCaseTypeSurfaceWater: NoCaseTypeSoilImpacted: NoCaseTypeUndetermined: F,ACaseType: PollutionCharacterizationFacilityStatus: SLICProgramType: RegionalBoardLeadAgency: NotreportedDateFirstReported: BCPUNKNOWNRPCity,St,Zip: P O BOX1069RPAddress: NotreportedRPNumber: NotreportedRPPhone: NotreportedRPContact: UNOCALCORPResponsibleParty: UNOCALCOR571RBCaseIn: NotreportedDiscovered: NotreportedEnteredIntoDatabase: SL203011375RegionalBoardCase#: NotreportedLeakSiteCrossStreet: 3Region: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL - TANK FARM RD BULKSTORAGEName: SLIC REG 3: CERS CIWQSSite12of25inclusterA NPDES Actual: 127 ft. Property CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 Target CHMIRS276TANKFARMRD N/A A12 CPS-SLICSANLUISOBISPOTANKFARM S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 35 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation onto soil, material recovered and cleaned up. the hydraulic system cracked, material released compaction wheel, a fitting between a hose and from a piece of excavating equipment that had a Per NRC report: Caller is reporting areleaseDescription: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: NotreportedNumberofFatalities: NotreportedNumberofInjuries: NotreportedEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: 2QuantityReleased: Oil - HydraulicFluidSubstance: NotreportedEDate: NotreportedSiteType: YesContained: NotreportedAmount: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentAdminAgency: 8/23/2012IncidentDate: NRCAgency: 2012Year: 1010Date/Time: NotreportedOther: Oz.Measure: NotreportedType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: ReportingPartyCleanupBy: OilFieldSpillSite: NotreportedWaterway: NoWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 36 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: ConstructionProgramType: 340C373392WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: 456863RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000002NPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: 93442DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: MorroBayDischargeCity: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoDischargeName: 4000 Hwy1DischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 07/10/2015EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: ConstructionProgramType: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 340C373392WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: 456863RegulatoryMeasureID: 0AgencyNumber: 3Region: CAS000002NPDESNumber: ActiveFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANKFARMName: NPDES: 120.66450Longitude: 35.24706Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017919RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0012485FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCALIFORNIAName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 37 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93442DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: MorroBayDischargeCity: 4000 Hwy1DischargeAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 07/10/2015EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 38 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NConstypeLinearUtilityInd: ProjectManagerDeveloperContactTitle: AndrewSmithDeveloperContact: 93442DeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: MorroBayDeveloperCity: 4000 Hwy1DeveloperAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: smith.andy@chevron.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-546-6915OperatorContactPhone: ProjectManagerOperatorContactTitle: AndrewSmithOperatorContact: 93442OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: MorroBayOperatorCity: 4000 Hwy1OperatorAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoOperatorName: smith.andy@chevron.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-546-6915ContactPhone: ProjectManagerContactTitle: AndrewSmithContact: AcresPlaceSizeUnit: 332PlaceSize: 07/10/2015StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 07/10/2015ProcessedDate: 06/29/2015ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340C373392WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: ConstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 456863RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 39 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93442OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: MorroBayOperatorCity: 4000 Hwy1OperatorAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoOperatorName: 07/10/2015StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: ConstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: 340C373392WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANKFARMName: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: 29-JUN-15CertificationDate: ProjectManagerCertifierTitle: AndrewSmithCertifier: San Luis ObsipoCreekReceivingWaterName: YDirDischargeUswaterInd: NConstypeWaterSewerInd: NConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NConstypeTransportInd: NConstypeResidentialInd: NConstypeReconsInd: NConstypeOtherInd: Remediation andRestorationConstypeOtherDescription: NConstypeIndustrialInd: NConstypeGasLineInd: NConstypeElectricalLineInd: NConstypeCommertialInd: NConstypeCommLineInd: NConstypeCableLineInd: NConstypeBelowGroundInd: NConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: 805-540-9812EmergencyPhone: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 40 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93442DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: MorroBayDischargeCity: 4000 Hwy1DischargeAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 07/10/2015EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: ConstructionProgramType: 340C373392WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: 456863RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000002NPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 41 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ProjectManagerOperatorContactTitle: AndrewSmithOperatorContact: 93442OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: MorroBayOperatorCity: 4000 Hwy1OperatorAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoOperatorName: smith.andy@chevron.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-546-6915ContactPhone: ProjectManagerContactTitle: AndrewSmithContact: AcresPlaceSizeUnit: 332PlaceSize: 07/10/2015StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 07/10/2015ProcessedDate: 06/29/2015ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340C373392WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: ConstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 456863RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 42 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/10/2015EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000002NPDESNumber: 340C373392WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterconstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: CONSTWProgram: 3Region: NotreportedSIC/NAICS: ConstructionPlace/Project Type: 4000 Hwy 1, Morro Bay, CA93442AgencyAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANKFARMName: CIWQS: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: 29-JUN-15CertificationDate: ProjectManagerCertifierTitle: AndrewSmithCertifier: San Luis ObsipoCreekReceivingWaterName: YDirDischargeUswaterInd: NConstypeWaterSewerInd: NConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NConstypeTransportInd: NConstypeResidentialInd: NConstypeReconsInd: NConstypeOtherInd: Remediation andRestorationConstypeOtherDescription: NConstypeIndustrialInd: NConstypeGasLineInd: NConstypeElectricalLineInd: NConstypeCommertialInd: NConstypeCommLineInd: NConstypeCableLineInd: NConstypeBelowGroundInd: NConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: 805-540-9812EmergencyPhone: NConstypeLinearUtilityInd: ProjectManagerDeveloperContactTitle: AndrewSmithDeveloperContact: 93442DeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: MorroBayDeveloperCity: 4000 Hwy1DeveloperAddress: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: smith.andy@chevron.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-546-6915OperatorContactPhone: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 43 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: 07/01/2015TerminationDate: 08/17/1998EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I014475WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 1389SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Oil and Gas Field Services, NECPlace/Project Type: PO Box 1332, San Luis Obispo, CA93406AgencyAddress: Union Oil Company ofCaliforniaAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCALIFORNIAName: 120.664503Longitude: 35.247065Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: 3TTWQ: CComplexity: MinorMajor/Minor: 0.05DesignFlow: 01/28/2022Expiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 02/27/2018EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: NotreportedNPDESNumber: 3400218610WDID: R3-2016-0035OrderNumber: Enrollee - NPDESRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: SLICProgram: 3Region: 5541SIC/NAICS: TankFarmPlace/Project Type: Po Box 1332, San Luis Obispo, CA93406AgencyAddress: Chevron Environmental Management Company San LuisObispoAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: FORMER CHEVRON SAN LUIS OBISPO TANKFARMName: 120.66474Longitude: 35.25041Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued)S104583921 TC6926581.2s Page 44 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93442AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: MorroBayAffiliationCity: 4000 Hwy1AffiliationAddress: OperatorEntityTitle: Chevron Environmental ManagementCoEntityName: Owner/OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Construction StormWaterCERSDescription: 836661CERSID: 541695SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANKFARMName: CERS: 120.66128Longitude: 35.24684Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM (Continued) S104583921 NotreportedLongMin: NotreportedLongDeg: NotreportedLatQuad: NotreportedLatSec: NotreportedLatMin: NotreportedLatDeg: NotreportedDirectionFromCity: NotreportedDistanceUnits: NotreportedDistanceFromCity: 93401LocationZip: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationCounty: CALocationState: SANMARGURITALocationNearestCity: NotreportedLocationStreet2: NotreportedLocationStreet1: 276 TANK FARMROADLoactionAddress: NotreportedIncidentLocation: DISCOVEREDIncidentDTG: 1994-10-13 09:00:00IncidentDateTime: UNKNOWNIncidentCause: UNKNOWNSHEENTypeofIncident: UNKNOWN//OLD LEAKSITEDescriptionofIncident: 265186NRCReport #: Incident Commons: Site 13 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN MARGURITA, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM ROAD N/A A13 ERNS 94265186 TC6926581.2s Page 45 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStateLeaseNumber: NotreportedOCSPNumber: NotreportedOCSGNumber: NotreportedLocationBlockID: NotreportedLocationAreaID: NotreportedPlatformLetter: NotreportedPlatformRigName: NotreportedActualAmountUnits: NotreportedActualAmount: NotreportedCapacityofTankUnits: NotreportedCapacityofTank: NotreportedTankID: NotreportedTankRegulatedBy: UTankRegulated: UTransportableContainer: ABOVETankAboveGround: NotreportedDescriptionofTank: NBrakeFailure: NotreportedDOTCrossingNumber: YDeviceOperational: NotreportedCrossingDeviceType: UNKNOWNTypeVehicleInvolved: UNKNOWNRailroadMilepost: NotreportedLocationSubdivision: NGradeCrossing: NRailroadHotline: UPipelineCovered: UExposedUnderwater: ABOVEPipelineAboveGround: UDOTRegulated: UNKNOWNPipelineType: UNPDESCompliance: NotreportedNPDES: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedGeneratingCapacity: UPowerGeneratingFacility: UNKNOWNTypeofFixedObject: NotreportedBuildingID: NotreportedRoadMileMarker: NotreportedAircraftRunwayNumber: NotreportedAircraftHanger: NotreportedAircraftSpotNumber: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoardUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoard: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacityUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacity: NotreportedAircraftID: NotreportedAircraftModel: UNKNOWNAircraftType: 265186NRCReport #: Incidents: NotreportedPotentialRange: 12ELocationrange: 29SLocationTownship: 25LocationSection: NotreportedLongQuad: NotreportedLongSec: Continued)94265186 TC6926581.2s Page 46 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedRoadDesc: NRoadClosed: NotreportedWaterwayClosureTime: NotreportedWaterwayDesc: NWaterwayClosed: NotreportedAirClosureTime: NotreportedAirCorridorDesc: NAirCorridorClosed: NotreportedDamageAmount: NAnyDamages: NotreportedNumberFatalities: UAnyFatalities: NotreportedNumberHospitalized: NotreportedNumberInjured: UAnyInjuries: NotreportedRadiusofEvacuation: NotreportedWhoEvacuated: NotreportedNumberEvacuated: NAnyEvacuations: UFireExtinguished: NFireInvolved: 265186NRCReport #: Incident Details: XXXPassengerDelay: XXXPassengerRoute: NotreportedPassengerHandling: NotreportedUnknownTesting: NotreportedOtherEmployeeTesting: NotreportedSignalmanTesting: NotreportedTrainDispatcherTesting: NotreportedBrakemanTesting: NotreportedRCLOperatorTesting: NotreportedYardForemanTesting: NotreportedTrainmanTesting: NotreportedEngineerTesting: NotreportedConductorTesting: XXXSubPartCTestingReq: NotreportedFBIContactDateTime: NotreportedFBIContact: NotreportedCRChangeDate: NotreportedCREndDate: NotreportedCRBeginDate: NotreportedTransitBusFlag: NotreportedServiceDisruptionUnits: NotreportedServiceDisruptionTime: NotreportedDateTiemNormalService: NotreportedAirbagDeployed: YStructureOperational: NotreportedStructureName: NotreportedTypeofStructure: NAllision: NotreportedContinuousReleasePermit: NotreportedInitialContinuousReleaseNo: NotreportedContinuousReleaseType: NotreportedBerthSlipNumber: NotreportedPierDockNumber: Continued)94265186 TC6926581.2s Page 47 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKPassengersTransferred: NotreportedReleaseRateRate: NotreportedReleaseRateUnit: NotreportedDurationUnit: YOffshore: NotreportedSheenSizeWidthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeWidth: NotreportedSheenSizeLengthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeLength: NotreportednearestRiverMileMarker: NotreportedFederalAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyNotified: AREA AFFECTED UNKNOWNWILL NOTIFY:OESAdditionalInfo: NotreportedSheenSizeUnits: NotreportedTrackCLosureUnits: NotreportedRoadClosureUnits: NotreportedCurrentSpeedUnit: NotreportedOccupantFatality: NotreportedPassengerInjuries: NotreportedEmployeeInjuries: NotreportedWindSpeedUnit: NCommunityImpact: NotreportedPassFatality: NotreportedEmplFatality: NotreportedTrackCloseDir: NotreportedWaterTemperature: NotreportedCurrentDirection: NotreportedCurrentSpeed: NotreportedWaveCondition: NotreportedSheenOdorDescription: NotreportedDirectionofSheenTravel: NotreportedSheenColor: NotreportedSheenSize: UWaterSupplyContaminated: NotreportedWindDirection: NotreportedWindSpeed: NotreportedAirTemperature: NotreportedWeatherConditions: NotreportedOtherAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyReportNumber: NotreportedStateAgencyonScene: CLEANING UP AREA //SITEASSESSMENTDescRemedialAction: NotreportedReleaserate: NotreportedEstimatedDurationofRelease: UReleaseSecured: NotreportedTributaryof: NotreportedBodyofWater: SOILAdditionalMediumInfo: LANDMediumDesc: NotreportedMediaInterest: NotreportedTrackClosureTime: NotreportedTrackDesc: NTrackClosed: NMajorArtery: NotreportedClosureDirection: NotreportedRoadClosureTime: Continued)94265186 TC6926581.2s Page 48 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasureReachWater: 0AmountinWater: YESIfReachedWater: OIL: CRUDENameofMaterial: UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasure: 0AmountofMaterial: NotreportedUNNumber: NotreportedCaseNumber: OILChrisCode: 265186NRCReport #: Material Involved: UNAVAILABLESource: NotreportedOnBehalf: 93401ResponsibleZip: CAResponsibleState: SAN LUISOBISPOResponsibleCity: PRIVATEENTERPRISEResponsibleOrgType: UNOCALResponsibleCompany: INCCallType: 1994-10-13 12:31:59DateTimeComplete: 1994-10-13 12:29:01DateTimeReceived: 94265186SiteID: 265186NRCReport #: Calls: Continued)94265186 NotreportedLongMin: NotreportedLongDeg: NotreportedLatQuad: NotreportedLatSec: NotreportedLatMin: NotreportedLatDeg: NotreportedDirectionFromCity: NotreportedDistanceUnits: NotreportedDistanceFromCity: 93401LocationZip: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationCounty: CALocationState: SANMARGURITALocationNearestCity: NotreportedLocationStreet2: NotreportedLocationStreet1: 276 TANK FARMROADLoactionAddress: NotreportedIncidentLocation: DISCOVEREDIncidentDTG: 1994-10-13 12:00:00IncidentDateTime: UNKNOWNIncidentCause: PIPELINETypeofIncident: OLD CONTAMINATION FM 8" PIPELINEDescriptionofIncident: 265265NRCReport #: Incident Commons: Site 14 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN MARGURITA, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM ROAD N/A A14 ERNS 94265265 TC6926581.2s Page 49 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStateLeaseNumber: NotreportedOCSPNumber: NotreportedOCSGNumber: NotreportedLocationBlockID: NotreportedLocationAreaID: NotreportedPlatformLetter: NotreportedPlatformRigName: NotreportedActualAmountUnits: NotreportedActualAmount: NotreportedCapacityofTankUnits: NotreportedCapacityofTank: NotreportedTankID: NotreportedTankRegulatedBy: UTankRegulated: UTransportableContainer: ABOVETankAboveGround: NotreportedDescriptionofTank: NBrakeFailure: NotreportedDOTCrossingNumber: YDeviceOperational: NotreportedCrossingDeviceType: UNKNOWNTypeVehicleInvolved: UNKNOWNRailroadMilepost: NotreportedLocationSubdivision: NGradeCrossing: NRailroadHotline: UPipelineCovered: UExposedUnderwater: ABOVEPipelineAboveGround: UDOTRegulated: UNKNOWNPipelineType: UNPDESCompliance: NotreportedNPDES: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedGeneratingCapacity: UPowerGeneratingFacility: UNKNOWNTypeofFixedObject: NotreportedBuildingID: NotreportedRoadMileMarker: NotreportedAircraftRunwayNumber: NotreportedAircraftHanger: NotreportedAircraftSpotNumber: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoardUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoard: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacityUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacity: NotreportedAircraftID: NotreportedAircraftModel: UNKNOWNAircraftType: 265265NRCReport #: Incidents: NotreportedPotentialRange: 13ELocationrange: 29SLocationTownship: 18LocationSection: NotreportedLongQuad: NotreportedLongSec: Continued)94265265 TC6926581.2s Page 50 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedRoadDesc: NRoadClosed: NotreportedWaterwayClosureTime: NotreportedWaterwayDesc: NWaterwayClosed: NotreportedAirClosureTime: NotreportedAirCorridorDesc: NAirCorridorClosed: NotreportedDamageAmount: NAnyDamages: NotreportedNumberFatalities: UAnyFatalities: NotreportedNumberHospitalized: NotreportedNumberInjured: UAnyInjuries: NotreportedRadiusofEvacuation: NotreportedWhoEvacuated: NotreportedNumberEvacuated: NAnyEvacuations: UFireExtinguished: NFireInvolved: 265265NRCReport #: Incident Details: XXXPassengerDelay: XXXPassengerRoute: NotreportedPassengerHandling: NotreportedUnknownTesting: NotreportedOtherEmployeeTesting: NotreportedSignalmanTesting: NotreportedTrainDispatcherTesting: NotreportedBrakemanTesting: NotreportedRCLOperatorTesting: NotreportedYardForemanTesting: NotreportedTrainmanTesting: NotreportedEngineerTesting: NotreportedConductorTesting: XXXSubPartCTestingReq: NotreportedFBIContactDateTime: NotreportedFBIContact: NotreportedCRChangeDate: NotreportedCREndDate: NotreportedCRBeginDate: NotreportedTransitBusFlag: NotreportedServiceDisruptionUnits: NotreportedServiceDisruptionTime: NotreportedDateTiemNormalService: NotreportedAirbagDeployed: YStructureOperational: NotreportedStructureName: NotreportedTypeofStructure: NAllision: NotreportedContinuousReleasePermit: NotreportedInitialContinuousReleaseNo: NotreportedContinuousReleaseType: NotreportedBerthSlipNumber: NotreportedPierDockNumber: Continued)94265265 TC6926581.2s Page 51 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKPassengersTransferred: NotreportedReleaseRateRate: NotreportedReleaseRateUnit: NotreportedDurationUnit: NOffshore: NotreportedSheenSizeWidthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeWidth: NotreportedSheenSizeLengthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeLength: NotreportednearestRiverMileMarker: NotreportedFederalAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyNotified: AREA AFFECTEDUNKNOWNAdditionalInfo: NotreportedSheenSizeUnits: NotreportedTrackCLosureUnits: NotreportedRoadClosureUnits: NotreportedCurrentSpeedUnit: NotreportedOccupantFatality: NotreportedPassengerInjuries: NotreportedEmployeeInjuries: NotreportedWindSpeedUnit: NCommunityImpact: NotreportedPassFatality: NotreportedEmplFatality: NotreportedTrackCloseDir: NotreportedWaterTemperature: NotreportedCurrentDirection: NotreportedCurrentSpeed: NotreportedWaveCondition: NotreportedSheenOdorDescription: NotreportedDirectionofSheenTravel: NotreportedSheenColor: NotreportedSheenSize: UWaterSupplyContaminated: NotreportedWindDirection: NotreportedWindSpeed: NotreportedAirTemperature: NotreportedWeatherConditions: NotreportedOtherAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyReportNumber: NotreportedStateAgencyonScene: SITEASSESSMENTDescRemedialAction: NotreportedReleaserate: NotreportedEstimatedDurationofRelease: UReleaseSecured: NotreportedTributaryof: NotreportedBodyofWater: SOILAdditionalMediumInfo: LANDMediumDesc: NotreportedMediaInterest: NotreportedTrackClosureTime: NotreportedTrackDesc: NTrackClosed: NMajorArtery: NotreportedClosureDirection: NotreportedRoadClosureTime: Continued)94265265 TC6926581.2s Page 52 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasureReachWater: 0AmountinWater: YESIfReachedWater: OIL: CRUDENameofMaterial: UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasure: 0AmountofMaterial: NotreportedUNNumber: NotreportedCaseNumber: OILChrisCode: 265265NRCReport #: Material Involved: UNAVAILABLESource: NotreportedOnBehalf: 93401ResponsibleZip: CAResponsibleState: SAN LUISOBISPOResponsibleCity: PRIVATEENTERPRISEResponsibleOrgType: UNOCALResponsibleCompany: INCCallType: 1994-10-13 16:58:38DateTimeComplete: 1994-10-13 16:56:08DateTimeReceived: 94265265SiteID: 265265NRCReport #: Calls: Continued)94265265 NotreportedLongMin: NotreportedLongDeg: NotreportedLatQuad: NotreportedLatSec: NotreportedLatMin: NotreportedLatDeg: NotreportedDirectionFromCity: NotreportedDistanceUnits: NotreportedDistanceFromCity: 93401LocationZip: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationCounty: CALocationState: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationNearestCity: NotreportedLocationStreet2: NotreportedLocationStreet1: 276 TANK FARMROADLoactionAddress: NotreportedIncidentLocation: DISCOVEREDIncidentDTG: 1994-10-11 13:15:00IncidentDateTime: OTHERIncidentCause: PIPELINETypeofIncident: DURING MAINTENANCE CONTAMINATED SOIL WAS FOUND IN ACREEKDescriptionofIncident: 264893NRCReport #: Incident Commons: Site 15 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM ROAD N/A A15 ERNS 94264893 TC6926581.2s Page 53 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStateLeaseNumber: NotreportedOCSPNumber: NotreportedOCSGNumber: NotreportedLocationBlockID: NotreportedLocationAreaID: NotreportedPlatformLetter: NotreportedPlatformRigName: NotreportedActualAmountUnits: NotreportedActualAmount: NotreportedCapacityofTankUnits: NotreportedCapacityofTank: NotreportedTankID: NotreportedTankRegulatedBy: UTankRegulated: UTransportableContainer: ABOVETankAboveGround: NotreportedDescriptionofTank: NBrakeFailure: NotreportedDOTCrossingNumber: YDeviceOperational: NotreportedCrossingDeviceType: UNKNOWNTypeVehicleInvolved: UNKNOWNRailroadMilepost: NotreportedLocationSubdivision: NGradeCrossing: NRailroadHotline: UPipelineCovered: UExposedUnderwater: ABOVEPipelineAboveGround: UDOTRegulated: UNKNOWNPipelineType: UNPDESCompliance: NotreportedNPDES: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedGeneratingCapacity: UPowerGeneratingFacility: UNKNOWNTypeofFixedObject: NotreportedBuildingID: NotreportedRoadMileMarker: NotreportedAircraftRunwayNumber: NotreportedAircraftHanger: NotreportedAircraftSpotNumber: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoardUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoard: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacityUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacity: NotreportedAircraftID: NotreportedAircraftModel: UNKNOWNAircraftType: 264893NRCReport #: Incidents: NotreportedPotentialRange: NotreportedLocationrange: NotreportedLocationTownship: NotreportedLocationSection: NotreportedLongQuad: NotreportedLongSec: Continued)94264893 TC6926581.2s Page 54 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedRoadDesc: NRoadClosed: NotreportedWaterwayClosureTime: NotreportedWaterwayDesc: NWaterwayClosed: NotreportedAirClosureTime: NotreportedAirCorridorDesc: NAirCorridorClosed: NotreportedDamageAmount: NAnyDamages: NotreportedNumberFatalities: UAnyFatalities: NotreportedNumberHospitalized: NotreportedNumberInjured: UAnyInjuries: NotreportedRadiusofEvacuation: NotreportedWhoEvacuated: NotreportedNumberEvacuated: NAnyEvacuations: UFireExtinguished: NFireInvolved: 264893NRCReport #: Incident Details: XXXPassengerDelay: XXXPassengerRoute: NotreportedPassengerHandling: NotreportedUnknownTesting: NotreportedOtherEmployeeTesting: NotreportedSignalmanTesting: NotreportedTrainDispatcherTesting: NotreportedBrakemanTesting: NotreportedRCLOperatorTesting: NotreportedYardForemanTesting: NotreportedTrainmanTesting: NotreportedEngineerTesting: NotreportedConductorTesting: XXXSubPartCTestingReq: NotreportedFBIContactDateTime: NotreportedFBIContact: NotreportedCRChangeDate: NotreportedCREndDate: NotreportedCRBeginDate: NotreportedTransitBusFlag: NotreportedServiceDisruptionUnits: NotreportedServiceDisruptionTime: NotreportedDateTiemNormalService: NotreportedAirbagDeployed: YStructureOperational: NotreportedStructureName: NotreportedTypeofStructure: NAllision: NotreportedContinuousReleasePermit: NotreportedInitialContinuousReleaseNo: NotreportedContinuousReleaseType: NotreportedBerthSlipNumber: NotreportedPierDockNumber: Continued)94264893 TC6926581.2s Page 55 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKPassengersTransferred: NotreportedReleaseRateRate: NotreportedReleaseRateUnit: NotreportedDurationUnit: NOffshore: NotreportedSheenSizeWidthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeWidth: NotreportedSheenSizeLengthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeLength: NotreportednearestRiverMileMarker: NotreportedFederalAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyNotified: THE CONTAMINATION IS BELIEVED TO BE FM A LEAKINGPIPELINEAdditionalInfo: NotreportedSheenSizeUnits: NotreportedTrackCLosureUnits: NotreportedRoadClosureUnits: NotreportedCurrentSpeedUnit: NotreportedOccupantFatality: NotreportedPassengerInjuries: NotreportedEmployeeInjuries: NotreportedWindSpeedUnit: NCommunityImpact: NotreportedPassFatality: NotreportedEmplFatality: NotreportedTrackCloseDir: NotreportedWaterTemperature: NotreportedCurrentDirection: NotreportedCurrentSpeed: NotreportedWaveCondition: NotreportedSheenOdorDescription: NotreportedDirectionofSheenTravel: NotreportedSheenColor: NotreportedSheenSize: UWaterSupplyContaminated: NotreportedWindDirection: NotreportedWindSpeed: NotreportedAirTemperature: NotreportedWeatherConditions: NotreportedOtherAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyReportNumber: NotreportedStateAgencyonScene: CREWS ONSCENEDescRemedialAction: NotreportedReleaserate: NotreportedEstimatedDurationofRelease: UReleaseSecured: NotreportedTributaryof: NotreportedBodyofWater: TASSAJARASCREEKAdditionalMediumInfo: WATERMediumDesc: NotreportedMediaInterest: NotreportedTrackClosureTime: NotreportedTrackDesc: NTrackClosed: NMajorArtery: NotreportedClosureDirection: NotreportedRoadClosureTime: Continued)94264893 TC6926581.2s Page 56 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasureReachWater: 0AmountinWater: YESIfReachedWater: OIL: CRUDENameofMaterial: UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasure: 0AmountofMaterial: NotreportedUNNumber: NotreportedCaseNumber: OILChrisCode: 264893NRCReport #: Material Involved: UNAVAILABLESource: NotreportedOnBehalf: 93401ResponsibleZip: CAResponsibleState: SAN LUISOBISPOResponsibleCity: PRIVATEENTERPRISEResponsibleOrgType: UNOCALResponsibleCompany: INCCallType: 1994-10-11 16:41:01DateTimeComplete: 1994-10-11 16:38:03DateTimeReceived: 94264893SiteID: 264893NRCReport #: Calls: Continued)94264893 NotreportedLatSec: NotreportedLatMin: NotreportedLatDeg: NotreportedDirectionFromCity: NotreportedDistanceUnits: NotreportedDistanceFromCity: 93406LocationZip: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationCounty: CALocationState: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationNearestCity: NotreportedLocationStreet2: NotreportedLocationStreet1: 276 TANK FARMROADLoactionAddress: NotreportedIncidentLocation: OCCURREDIncidentDTG: 2012-08-23 10:10:00IncidentDateTime: EQUIPMENTFAILUREIncidentCause: MOBILETypeofIncident: OF OIL TO THE DIRT. FITTING BETWEEN A HOSE AN HYDRAULIC SYSTEM CRACKED, SPILLING 2 OUNCES FROM A PIECE OF EXCAVATING EQUIPMENT THAT HAD A COMPACTION WHEEL. A CALLER IS REPORTING A SPILL OF APPROXIMATELY 2 OUNCES OF HYDRAULICOILDescriptionofIncident: 1022023NRCReport #: Incident Commons: Site 16 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 Target 276 TANK FARM ROAD N/A A16 ERNS 2012022023 TC6926581.2s Page 57 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLocationBlockID: NotreportedLocationAreaID: NotreportedPlatformLetter: NotreportedPlatformRigName: NotreportedActualAmountUnits: NotreportedActualAmount: NotreportedCapacityofTankUnits: NotreportedCapacityofTank: NotreportedTankID: NotreportedTankRegulatedBy: UTankRegulated: UTransportableContainer: ABOVETankAboveGround: NotreportedDescriptionofTank: UBrakeFailure: NotreportedDOTCrossingNumber: UDeviceOperational: NotreportedCrossingDeviceType: NotreportedTypeVehicleInvolved: NotreportedRailroadMilepost: NotreportedLocationSubdivision: UGradeCrossing: NotreportedRailroadHotline: UPipelineCovered: NExposedUnderwater: ABOVEPipelineAboveGround: UDOTRegulated: NotreportedPipelineType: UNPDESCompliance: NotreportedNPDES: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedGeneratingCapacity: UPowerGeneratingFacility: NotreportedTypeofFixedObject: NotreportedBuildingID: NotreportedRoadMileMarker: NotreportedAircraftRunwayNumber: NotreportedAircraftHanger: NotreportedAircraftSpotNumber: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoardUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoard: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacityUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacity: NotreportedAircraftID: NotreportedAircraftModel: NotreportedAircraftType: 1022023NRCReport #: Incidents: NPotentialRange: NotreportedLocationrange: NotreportedLocationTownship: NotreportedLocationSection: NotreportedLongQuad: NotreportedLongSec: NotreportedLongMin: NotreportedLongDeg: NotreportedLatQuad: Continued)2012022023 TC6926581.2s Page 58 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedWaterwayDesc: NWaterwayClosed: NotreportedAirClosureTime: NotreportedAirCorridorDesc: NAirCorridorClosed: NotreportedDamageAmount: NAnyDamages: NotreportedNumberFatalities: NAnyFatalities: NotreportedNumberHospitalized: NotreportedNumberInjured: NAnyInjuries: NotreportedRadiusofEvacuation: NotreportedWhoEvacuated: NotreportedNumberEvacuated: NAnyEvacuations: UFireExtinguished: NFireInvolved: 1022023NRCReport #: Incident Details: XXXPassengerDelay: XXXPassengerRoute: NotreportedPassengerHandling: NotreportedUnknownTesting: NotreportedOtherEmployeeTesting: NotreportedSignalmanTesting: NotreportedTrainDispatcherTesting: NotreportedBrakemanTesting: NotreportedRCLOperatorTesting: NotreportedYardForemanTesting: NotreportedTrainmanTesting: NotreportedEngineerTesting: NotreportedConductorTesting: XXXSubPartCTestingReq: NotreportedFBIContactDateTime: NotreportedFBIContact: NotreportedCRChangeDate: NotreportedCREndDate: NotreportedCRBeginDate: NotreportedTransitBusFlag: NotreportedServiceDisruptionUnits: NotreportedServiceDisruptionTime: NotreportedDateTiemNormalService: UAirbagDeployed: UStructureOperational: NotreportedStructureName: NotreportedTypeofStructure: UAllision: NotreportedContinuousReleasePermit: NotreportedInitialContinuousReleaseNo: NotreportedContinuousReleaseType: NotreportedBerthSlipNumber: NotreportedPierDockNumber: NotreportedStateLeaseNumber: NotreportedOCSPNumber: NotreportedOCSGNumber: Continued)2012022023 TC6926581.2s Page 59 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDurationUnit: NOffshore: NotreportedSheenSizeWidthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeWidth: NotreportedSheenSizeLengthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeLength: NotreportednearestRiverMileMarker: NotreportedFederalAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyNotified: NotreportedAdditionalInfo: NotreportedSheenSizeUnits: NotreportedTrackCLosureUnits: NotreportedRoadClosureUnits: NotreportedCurrentSpeedUnit: NotreportedOccupantFatality: NotreportedPassengerInjuries: NotreportedEmployeeInjuries: NotreportedWindSpeedUnit: NotreportedCommunityImpact: NotreportedPassFatality: NotreportedEmplFatality: NotreportedTrackCloseDir: NotreportedWaterTemperature: NotreportedCurrentDirection: NotreportedCurrentSpeed: NotreportedWaveCondition: NotreportedSheenOdorDescription: NotreportedDirectionofSheenTravel: NotreportedSheenColor: NotreportedSheenSize: UWaterSupplyContaminated: NotreportedWindDirection: NotreportedWindSpeed: 75AirTemperature: CLEARWeatherConditions: NotreportedOtherAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyReportNumber: NotreportedStateAgencyonScene: REPAIR TRUCK. RECOVERED OIL AND CLEANED UP THE DIRT. MECHANICS WILL INSPECTANDDescRemedialAction: NotreportedReleaserate: NotreportedEstimatedDurationofRelease: YReleaseSecured: NotreportedTributaryof: NotreportedBodyofWater: DIRT ADJENCENT TOWETLANDSAdditionalMediumInfo: SOILMediumDesc: NONEMediaInterest: NotreportedTrackClosureTime: NotreportedTrackDesc: NTrackClosed: NMajorArtery: NotreportedClosureDirection: NotreportedRoadClosureTime: NotreportedRoadDesc: NRoadClosed: NotreportedWaterwayClosureTime: Continued)2012022023 TC6926581.2s Page 60 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedUnitofMeasureReachWater: NotreportedAmountinWater: NOIfReachedWater: HYDRAULICOILNameofMaterial: OUNCE(S)Unit of Measure: 2AmountofMaterial: NotreportedUNNumber: 000000-00-0CaseNumber: OHYChrisCode: 1022023NRCReport #: Material Involved: TELEPHONESource: NotreportedOnBehalf: 93406ResponsibleZip: CAResponsibleState: SAN LUISOBISPOResponsibleCity: PRIVATEENTERPRISEResponsibleOrgType: CHEVRONResponsibleCompany: INCCallType: 2012-08-23 17:01:26DateTimeComplete: 2012-08-23 16:51:17DateTimeReceived: 20121022023SiteID: 1022023NRCReport #: Calls: NotreportedVehicleModel: NotreportedVehicleMake: NotreportedVehicleYear: NotreportedAmountofCargoonBoardUnits: NotreportedCargoCapacityUnits: CONSTRUCTIONVEHICLEMobileType: UNoncomplianceWithHazmat: UCarrierLicensed: UHazmatCarrier: NotreportedAmountofCargoonBoard: NotreportedCargoCapacity: NotreportedVehicleOwnFuelCapacity: NotreportedTrailerNumber: CATAPILLAR27DVehicleNumber: 1022023NRCReport #: Mobile Detail: NOPassengersTransferred: NotreportedReleaseRateRate: NotreportedReleaseRateUnit: Continued)2012022023 TC6926581.2s Page 61 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110065857923RegistryID: FINDS: Site 17 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM RD N/A A17 FINDSUNOCAL - TANK FARM RD BULK STORAGE 1023294129 NotreportedContainment: unocalCleanupBy: NotreportedSpillSite: NotreportedWaterway: YESWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: 12:37:01PMOESTime: 9/15/1994OESDate: NotreportedOESnotification: 156OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARM RD TANK FARM -TANK # 80526Address: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: Site 18 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM RD TANK FARM -TANK # 80526 N/A A18 CHMIRS S105633953 TC6926581.2s Page 62 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation pipe -tank has been removed during demolition of tank , equipmentpuncturedDescription: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: NONumberofFatalities: NONumberofInjuries: NOEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: crudeoilSubstance: NotreportedEDate: OTHERSiteType: NOContained: less than abblAmount: NotreportedAdminAgency: 1225/15sept94IncidentDate: unocalAgency: 1994Year: NotreportedDate/Time: NotreportedOther: NotreportedMeasure: PETROLEUMType: NotreportedWhatHappened: Continued)S105633953 drinking water), Soil, Surface water Contaminated Surface / Structure, Other Groundwater (uses otherthanPotentialMediaAffected: RegionalBoardFileLocation: SL203011375RBCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: DRNCaseWorker: Cleanup ProgramSiteCaseType: 120.664386749268Longitude: 35.2470034921018Latitude: NotreportedLeadAgencyCaseNumber: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SL203011375GlobalId: 04/06/2017StatusDate: Open - RemediationFacilityStatus: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: CHEVRON (FORMER UNOCAL) - TANK FARM ROAD BULKSTORAGEName: CPS-SLIC: Site 19 of 25 in cluster A HWTS Actual: 127 ft. Property HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 Target DEED276TANKFARMRD N/A A19 CPS-SLICCHEVRONUSA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 63 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 611 - Contaminated soil from site clean-upCAWasteCode: CAT000646117TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2019Year: PO BOX6004MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8773866044Telephone: KWAMEAWUKUContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA945830000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANKFARMName: HAZNET: Geotracker Land Use/DeedRestrictionsFileName: 08/16/2006DeedDate(s): YCovenantUploaded: SWRCBAgency: OPEN - REMEDIATIONStatus: SLICSiteType: NotreportedSubArea: NotreportedArea: SL203011375EnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARMROADAddress: CHEVRON (FORMER UNOCAL) - TANK FARM ROAD BULKSTORAGEName: DEED: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Water Board will comment on the draft EIR. the north side of Tank Farm Road as business park/light industry. The water/wetland contamination and to develop approximately 40 acres on recently initiated the CEQA process to remediate areas of surface approved by several federal, state, and local agencies. Chevron has health and ecological risk assessments have been conducted and have also been detected in onsite surface water/wetlands. Human asphalt-like and some are almost liquid-like). Petroleum hydrocarbons that are in various stages of "placticity" (i.e., some are the plume. The site has surface expressions of weathered crude oil appears that natural attenuation is occurring on the leading edge of Tank Farm Road & extending under Tank Farm Road a small distance). It boundary (from the NW side of the property immediately adjacent to this plume is stable and does not extend very far off the property the former fire training area. Investigations have indicated that mixture of various off-spec petroleum hydrocarbons that were used in area, there is a small, localized plume containing some benzene and a detected. In the area immediately downgradient of the former office plume in groundwater (concentrations above 1000 ug/L have not been immediatelysurrounding the former office area, there is no crude oil conducted since 1998 indicates that except for the area of crude oil onto the ground in 1926. Groundwater monitoring holding tanks to rupture and spill approximately 200 million gallons Lightning-induced fire caused several above ground earthen crudeoilSiteHistory: Arsenic, Lead, Asphalt, Crude Oil, OtherPetroleumPotentialContaminantsofConcern: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued) S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 64 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 151 - Asbestos containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980675276TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.92Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 151 - Asbestos containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980675276TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2017Year: 22.77000Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 151 - Asbestos containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980675276TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2018Year: 31677.06000Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 611 - Contaminated soil from site clean-upCAWasteCode: CAT000646117TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2018Year: 40.22640Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 161 - Fluid Catalytic CrackerwasteCAWasteCode: CAT000646117TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2018Year: 23.09440Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 614 -CA Waste Code: CAD980675276TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2018Year: 3.24600Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 151 - Asbestos containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980675276TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2019Year: 659.88000Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued) S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 65 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 20078024ManifestID: 20021014ReceiptDate: 3/15/2003 18:30:36CreationDate: 20021014ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 40WasteQuantity: 33.712QuantityTons: D99 - Disposal, OtherMethCode: D008RCRACode: 151 - Asbestos-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000646117TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD083003699TransEPAID: 20078026ManifestID: 20021211ReceiptDate: 3/27/2003 18:31:27CreationDate: 20021211ShipmentDate: CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2002Year: Additional Info: 9 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 0.29Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 181 - Other inorganic solidwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980675276TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2011Year: 16Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsDisposalMethod: 151 - Asbestos containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980675276TSDEPAID: CAR000054825Gepaid: 2012Year: 1.38Tons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued) S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 66 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD980675276TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 95378327ManifestID: 19990908ReceiptDate: 12/16/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990907ShipmentDate: CAR000054825GenEPAID: 1999Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 27WasteQuantity: 0.0972QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F002RCRACode: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD050806850TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000074591TransEPAID: 21891159ManifestID: 20020417ReceiptDate: 1/8/2003 18:32:09CreationDate: 20020416ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 8WasteQuantity: 6.7424QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 67 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTransName: CAD982444481TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 20078183ManifestID: 20030319ReceiptDate: 6/20/2003 18:30:47CreationDate: 20030318ShipmentDate: CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2003Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.92QuantityTons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 151 - Asbestos-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS - BUTTONWILLOWCATransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PACIFIC PETROLEUM CALIFORNIAINCTransName: CAD981164312TransEPAID: 012965215JJKManifestID: 20170803ReceiptDate: 6/20/2018 18:31:56CreationDate: 20170803ShipmentDate: CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2017Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 1WasteQuantity: 0.8428QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 151 - Asbestos-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued) S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 68 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD980675276TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 95378301ManifestID: 20000225ReceiptDate: 5/17/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000225ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 14WasteQuantity: 11.7992QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD980675276TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 95378302ManifestID: 20000308ReceiptDate: 5/23/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000308ShipmentDate: CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2000Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 75WasteQuantity: 0.315QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982444481TSDFAltEPAID: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 69 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 75WasteQuantity: 0.0375QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD980675276TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 95378304ManifestID: 20000113ReceiptDate: 4/4/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000113ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 12WasteQuantity: 10.1136QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD980675276TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 95378300ManifestID: 20000224ReceiptDate: 5/17/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000224ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 14WasteQuantity: 11.7992QuantityTons: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 70 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2001Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 40WasteQuantity: 16QuantityTons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 151 - Asbestos-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORSBUTTONWILLOWTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ROCKIN CJTRANSPORTTransName: CAR000146548TransEPAID: 005321097JJKManifestID: 20120201ReceiptDate: 4/10/2012 20:30:14CreationDate: 20120201ShipmentDate: CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2012Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 9WasteQuantity: 7.5852QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 151 - Asbestos-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD980675276TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 95378303ManifestID: 20000113ReceiptDate: 4/4/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000113ShipmentDate: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 71 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2011Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 2WasteQuantity: 1.6856QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NONERCRACode: 151 - Asbestos-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000646117TSDFAltEPAID: CHEMICAL WASTEMANAGEMENTTransName: CAT000646117TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ROCKIN CJTRANSPORTTransName: CAR000146548TransEPAID: 23757064ManifestID: 20050405ReceiptDate: 6/2/2005 18:31:52CreationDate: 20050405ShipmentDate: CAR000054825GenEPAID: 2005Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 10WasteQuantity: 8.428QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000646117TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD020168563TransEPAID: 96196816ManifestID: 20010213ReceiptDate: 4/9/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010213ShipmentDate: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 72 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 276 TANK FARMRDFacilityAddress: ABNU0002 SLO TANKFARMFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 1999-08-17 00:00:00IssuedEPAIDDate: RemediationServicesNAICSDescription: 56291NAICSCode: 2020-08-26 15:53:17.780CreateDate: CAR000054825EPAID: NAICS: SAN RAMON, CA94583City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: PO BOX6004ContactAddress: JOCKORODRIGUEZContactName: SAN RAMON, CA94583OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: PO BOX6004OwnerAddress: CHEVRON USAINCOwnerName: SAN RAMON, CA94583MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: PO BOX6004MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 08/26/2020LastActDate: 08/17/1999CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAR000054825EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 276 TANK FARMRDAddress: ABNU0002 SLO TANKFARMName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 580WasteQuantity: 0.29QuantityTons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsMethCode: D008RCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORSBUTTONWILLOWTransName: CAD980675276TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ROCKIN CJTRANSPORTTransName: CAR000146548TransEPAID: 005321096JJKManifestID: 20111209ReceiptDate: 12/19/2012 8:13:35CreationDate: 20111209ShipmentDate: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued)S113174552 TC6926581.2s Page 73 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: CHEVRON USA - ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM (Continued) S113174552 1700/10mar95IncidentDate: unocalAgency: 1995Year: NotreportedDate/Time: NotreportedOther: NotreportedMeasure: PETROLEUMType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: unocalCleanupBy: NotreportedSpillSite: drainagechannelWaterway: YESWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: 10:16:07AMOESTime: 3/31/1995OESDate: NotreportedOESnotification: 07627OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARM RD DRAINAGE CHANNEL ON S/W BOUNDRY OF UNOCALPROPERTYAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: Site 20 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM RD DRAINAGE CHANNEL ON S/W BOUNDRY OF UNOCAL P N/A A20 CHMIRS S106390568 TC6926581.2s Page 74 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported suspect-possible leaking pipelines caused bystormDescription: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: NONumberofFatalities: NONumberofInjuries: NOEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: crudeoilSubstance: NotreportedEDate: OTHERSiteType: YESContained: sheen intermittent spots within 100ydareaAmount: NotreportedAdminAgency: Continued)S106390568 NotreportedLongQuad: NotreportedLongSec: NotreportedLongMin: NotreportedLongDeg: NotreportedLatQuad: NotreportedLatSec: NotreportedLatMin: NotreportedLatDeg: NotreportedDirectionFromCity: NotreportedDistanceUnits: NotreportedDistanceFromCity: 93401LocationZip: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationCounty: CALocationState: SANTAMARGURITALocationNearestCity: NotreportedLocationStreet2: NotreportedLocationStreet1: 276 TANK FARMRDLoactionAddress: NotreportedIncidentLocation: DISCOVEREDIncidentDTG: 1994-11-14 12:00:00IncidentDateTime: UNKNOWNIncidentCause: PIPELINETypeofIncident: AN 8"LINE DISCOVERED CONTAMINATED SOIL DURING LINE REPLACEMENT//ASSUMESOURCEISDescriptionofIncident: 269701NRCReport #: Incident Commons: Site 21 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SANTA MARGURITA, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM RD N/A A21 ERNS 94269701 TC6926581.2s Page 75 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedBerthSlipNumber: NotreportedPierDockNumber: NotreportedStateLeaseNumber: NotreportedOCSPNumber: NotreportedOCSGNumber: NotreportedLocationBlockID: NotreportedLocationAreaID: NotreportedPlatformLetter: NotreportedPlatformRigName: NotreportedActualAmountUnits: NotreportedActualAmount: NotreportedCapacityofTankUnits: NotreportedCapacityofTank: NotreportedTankID: NotreportedTankRegulatedBy: UTankRegulated: UTransportableContainer: ABOVETankAboveGround: NotreportedDescriptionofTank: NBrakeFailure: NotreportedDOTCrossingNumber: YDeviceOperational: NotreportedCrossingDeviceType: UNKNOWNTypeVehicleInvolved: UNKNOWNRailroadMilepost: NotreportedLocationSubdivision: NGradeCrossing: NRailroadHotline: UPipelineCovered: UExposedUnderwater: ABOVEPipelineAboveGround: UDOTRegulated: UNKNOWNPipelineType: UNPDESCompliance: NotreportedNPDES: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedGeneratingCapacity: UPowerGeneratingFacility: UNKNOWNTypeofFixedObject: NotreportedBuildingID: NotreportedRoadMileMarker: NotreportedAircraftRunwayNumber: NotreportedAircraftHanger: NotreportedAircraftSpotNumber: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoardUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoard: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacityUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacity: NotreportedAircraftID: NotreportedAircraftModel: UNKNOWNAircraftType: 269701NRCReport #: Incidents: NotreportedPotentialRange: 12ELocationrange: 29SLocationTownship: 25LocationSection: Continued)94269701 TC6926581.2s Page 76 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedClosureDirection: NotreportedRoadClosureTime: NotreportedRoadDesc: NRoadClosed: NotreportedWaterwayClosureTime: NotreportedWaterwayDesc: NWaterwayClosed: NotreportedAirClosureTime: NotreportedAirCorridorDesc: NAirCorridorClosed: NotreportedDamageAmount: NAnyDamages: NotreportedNumberFatalities: UAnyFatalities: NotreportedNumberHospitalized: NotreportedNumberInjured: UAnyInjuries: NotreportedRadiusofEvacuation: NotreportedWhoEvacuated: NotreportedNumberEvacuated: NAnyEvacuations: UFireExtinguished: NFireInvolved: 269701NRCReport #: Incident Details: XXXPassengerDelay: XXXPassengerRoute: NotreportedPassengerHandling: NotreportedUnknownTesting: NotreportedOtherEmployeeTesting: NotreportedSignalmanTesting: NotreportedTrainDispatcherTesting: NotreportedBrakemanTesting: NotreportedRCLOperatorTesting: NotreportedYardForemanTesting: NotreportedTrainmanTesting: NotreportedEngineerTesting: NotreportedConductorTesting: XXXSubPartCTestingReq: NotreportedFBIContactDateTime: NotreportedFBIContact: NotreportedCRChangeDate: NotreportedCREndDate: NotreportedCRBeginDate: NotreportedTransitBusFlag: NotreportedServiceDisruptionUnits: NotreportedServiceDisruptionTime: NotreportedDateTiemNormalService: NotreportedAirbagDeployed: YStructureOperational: NotreportedStructureName: NotreportedTypeofStructure: NAllision: NotreportedContinuousReleasePermit: NotreportedInitialContinuousReleaseNo: NotreportedContinuousReleaseType: Continued)94269701 TC6926581.2s Page 77 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 269701NRCReport #: Calls: UNKPassengersTransferred: NotreportedReleaseRateRate: NotreportedReleaseRateUnit: NotreportedDurationUnit: NOffshore: NotreportedSheenSizeWidthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeWidth: NotreportedSheenSizeLengthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeLength: NotreportednearestRiverMileMarker: NotreportedFederalAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyNotified: AREA AFFECTEDUNKNOWNAdditionalInfo: NotreportedSheenSizeUnits: NotreportedTrackCLosureUnits: NotreportedRoadClosureUnits: NotreportedCurrentSpeedUnit: NotreportedOccupantFatality: NotreportedPassengerInjuries: NotreportedEmployeeInjuries: NotreportedWindSpeedUnit: NCommunityImpact: NotreportedPassFatality: NotreportedEmplFatality: NotreportedTrackCloseDir: NotreportedWaterTemperature: NotreportedCurrentDirection: NotreportedCurrentSpeed: NotreportedWaveCondition: NotreportedSheenOdorDescription: NotreportedDirectionofSheenTravel: NotreportedSheenColor: NotreportedSheenSize: UWaterSupplyContaminated: NotreportedWindDirection: NotreportedWindSpeed: NotreportedAirTemperature: NotreportedWeatherConditions: NotreportedOtherAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyReportNumber: NotreportedStateAgencyonScene: GROUD WATER WAS AFFECTED//DOING SITEASSESSMENTDescRemedialAction: NotreportedReleaserate: NotreportedEstimatedDurationofRelease: UReleaseSecured: NotreportedTributaryof: NotreportedBodyofWater: GROUNDWATERAdditionalMediumInfo: WATERMediumDesc: NotreportedMediaInterest: NotreportedTrackClosureTime: NotreportedTrackDesc: NTrackClosed: NMajorArtery: Continued)94269701 TC6926581.2s Page 78 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasureReachWater: 0AmountinWater: YESIfReachedWater: OIL: CRUDENameofMaterial: UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasure: 0AmountofMaterial: NotreportedUNNumber: NotreportedCaseNumber: OILChrisCode: 269701NRCReport #: Material Involved: UNAVAILABLESource: NotreportedOnBehalf: 93401ResponsibleZip: CAResponsibleState: SAN LUISOBISPOResponsibleCity: PRIVATEENTERPRISEResponsibleOrgType: UNOCALResponsibleCompany: INCCallType: 1994-11-14 18:22:48DateTimeComplete: 1994-11-14 18:19:40DateTimeReceived: 94269701SiteID: Continued)94269701 NotreportedLongSec: NotreportedLongMin: NotreportedLongDeg: NotreportedLatQuad: NotreportedLatSec: NotreportedLatMin: NotreportedLatDeg: NDirectionFromCity: MIDistanceUnits: 2.5DistanceFromCity: 93401LocationZip: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationCounty: CALocationState: SAN LUISOBISPOLocationNearestCity: NotreportedLocationStreet2: NotreportedLocationStreet1: 276 TANK FARMROADLoactionAddress: NotreportedIncidentLocation: DISCOVEREDIncidentDTG: 1994-10-10 15:45:00IncidentDateTime: UNKNOWNIncidentCause: PIPELINETypeofIncident: REPLACEMENT CONTAMINATED SOIL FOUND UNDERNEATH PIPELINE DURINGPIPELINEDescriptionofIncident: 264682NRCReport #: Incident Commons: Site 22 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Target 276 TANK FARM ROAD N/A A22 ERNS 94264682 TC6926581.2s Page 79 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPierDockNumber: NotreportedStateLeaseNumber: NotreportedOCSPNumber: NotreportedOCSGNumber: NotreportedLocationBlockID: NotreportedLocationAreaID: NotreportedPlatformLetter: NotreportedPlatformRigName: NotreportedActualAmountUnits: NotreportedActualAmount: NotreportedCapacityofTankUnits: NotreportedCapacityofTank: NotreportedTankID: NotreportedTankRegulatedBy: UTankRegulated: UTransportableContainer: ABOVETankAboveGround: NotreportedDescriptionofTank: NBrakeFailure: NotreportedDOTCrossingNumber: YDeviceOperational: NotreportedCrossingDeviceType: UNKNOWNTypeVehicleInvolved: UNKNOWNRailroadMilepost: NotreportedLocationSubdivision: NGradeCrossing: NRailroadHotline: UPipelineCovered: UExposedUnderwater: ABOVEPipelineAboveGround: UDOTRegulated: UNKNOWNPipelineType: UNPDESCompliance: NotreportedNPDES: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedGeneratingCapacity: UPowerGeneratingFacility: UNKNOWNTypeofFixedObject: NotreportedBuildingID: NotreportedRoadMileMarker: NotreportedAircraftRunwayNumber: NotreportedAircraftHanger: NotreportedAircraftSpotNumber: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoardUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelonBoard: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacityUnits: NotreportedAircraftFuelCapacity: NotreportedAircraftID: NotreportedAircraftModel: UNKNOWNAircraftType: 264682NRCReport #: Incidents: NotreportedPotentialRange: 19EASTLocationrange: 29SOUTHLocationTownship: 17LocationSection: NotreportedLongQuad: Continued)94264682 TC6926581.2s Page 80 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedRoadClosureTime: NotreportedRoadDesc: NRoadClosed: NotreportedWaterwayClosureTime: NotreportedWaterwayDesc: NWaterwayClosed: NotreportedAirClosureTime: NotreportedAirCorridorDesc: NAirCorridorClosed: NotreportedDamageAmount: NAnyDamages: NotreportedNumberFatalities: UAnyFatalities: NotreportedNumberHospitalized: NotreportedNumberInjured: UAnyInjuries: NotreportedRadiusofEvacuation: NotreportedWhoEvacuated: NotreportedNumberEvacuated: NAnyEvacuations: UFireExtinguished: NFireInvolved: 264682NRCReport #: Incident Details: XXXPassengerDelay: XXXPassengerRoute: NotreportedPassengerHandling: NotreportedUnknownTesting: NotreportedOtherEmployeeTesting: NotreportedSignalmanTesting: NotreportedTrainDispatcherTesting: NotreportedBrakemanTesting: NotreportedRCLOperatorTesting: NotreportedYardForemanTesting: NotreportedTrainmanTesting: NotreportedEngineerTesting: NotreportedConductorTesting: XXXSubPartCTestingReq: NotreportedFBIContactDateTime: NotreportedFBIContact: NotreportedCRChangeDate: NotreportedCREndDate: NotreportedCRBeginDate: NotreportedTransitBusFlag: NotreportedServiceDisruptionUnits: NotreportedServiceDisruptionTime: NotreportedDateTiemNormalService: NotreportedAirbagDeployed: YStructureOperational: NotreportedStructureName: NotreportedTypeofStructure: NAllision: NotreportedContinuousReleasePermit: NotreportedInitialContinuousReleaseNo: NotreportedContinuousReleaseType: NotreportedBerthSlipNumber: Continued)94264682 TC6926581.2s Page 81 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKPassengersTransferred: NotreportedReleaseRateRate: NotreportedReleaseRateUnit: NotreportedDurationUnit: NOffshore: NotreportedSheenSizeWidthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeWidth: NotreportedSheenSizeLengthUnits: NotreportedSheenSizeLength: NotreportednearestRiverMileMarker: NotreportedFederalAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyNotified: AREA AFFECTED: UNKNOWNAdditionalInfo: NotreportedSheenSizeUnits: NotreportedTrackCLosureUnits: NotreportedRoadClosureUnits: NotreportedCurrentSpeedUnit: NotreportedOccupantFatality: NotreportedPassengerInjuries: NotreportedEmployeeInjuries: NotreportedWindSpeedUnit: NCommunityImpact: NotreportedPassFatality: NotreportedEmplFatality: NotreportedTrackCloseDir: NotreportedWaterTemperature: NotreportedCurrentDirection: NotreportedCurrentSpeed: NotreportedWaveCondition: NotreportedSheenOdorDescription: NotreportedDirectionofSheenTravel: NotreportedSheenColor: NotreportedSheenSize: UWaterSupplyContaminated: NotreportedWindDirection: NotreportedWindSpeed: NotreportedAirTemperature: NotreportedWeatherConditions: NotreportedOtherAgencyNotified: NotreportedStateAgencyReportNumber: NotreportedStateAgencyonScene: SITE ASSESMENT INPROGRESSDescRemedialAction: NotreportedReleaserate: NotreportedEstimatedDurationofRelease: UReleaseSecured: NotreportedTributaryof: NotreportedBodyofWater: SOILAdditionalMediumInfo: LANDMediumDesc: NotreportedMediaInterest: NotreportedTrackClosureTime: NotreportedTrackDesc: NTrackClosed: NMajorArtery: NotreportedClosureDirection: Continued)94264682 TC6926581.2s Page 82 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasureReachWater: 0AmountinWater: YESIfReachedWater: OIL: CRUDENameofMaterial: UNKNOWNAMOUNTUnitofMeasure: 0AmountofMaterial: NotreportedUNNumber: NotreportedCaseNumber: OILChrisCode: 264682NRCReport #: Material Involved: UNAVAILABLESource: NotreportedOnBehalf: 93401ResponsibleZip: CAResponsibleState: SAN LUISOBISPOResponsibleCity: PRIVATEENTERPRISEResponsibleOrgType: UNOCALResponsibleCompany: INCCallType: 1994-10-10 19:02:45DateTimeComplete: 1994-10-10 18:55:18DateTimeReceived: 94264682SiteID: 264682NRCReport #: Calls: Continued)94264682 Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 895 AEROVISTA PLACE SUITE101AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DIANE KUKOL - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Entity Name: Regional BoardCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Cleanup ProgramSiteCERSDescription: SL203011375CERSID: 216203SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 276 TANK FARM "ROADAddress: CHEVRON (FORMER UNOCAL) - TANK FARM ROAD BULKSTORAGEName: CERS: Site 23 of 25 in cluster A Actual: 127 ft. Property SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 Target 276 TANK FARM "ROAD N/A A23 CERSCHEVRON (FORMER UNOCAL) - TANK FARM ROAD BULK STOR S121475962 TC6926581.2s Page 83 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: MIKEDYEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: DYERS DIESELROINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93403MailingCity,State,Zip: PO BOX3738MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: DIESELROBARBIE@HOTMAIL.COMContactEmail: 805-541-2976ContactFax: 805-541-2049ContactTelephone: GROVER BEACH, CA93433ContactCity,State,Zip: 1120 BODEGACTContactAddress: MIKEDYERContactName: CAL000323759EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 271 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: DYER’SDIESELROHandlerName: 20070817DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Site 1 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 271 TANK FARM RD CAL000323759 B24 RCRA NonGen / NLRDYER’S DIESELRO 1024818013 TC6926581.2s Page 84 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-473-2954Owner/Operator Telephone: NIPOMO, CA 93444-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 210 SANDRACOURTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: DYERS DIESELROINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-2049Owner/Operator Telephone: GROVER BEACH, CA93433Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1120 BODEGACTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: MIKEDYEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)1024818013 TC6926581.2s Page 85 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: DYER’SDIESELROHandlerName: 20070817ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)1024818013 273 TANK FARM RD #BAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: 120.66550Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020736RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0761ProgramElementCode: FA0000736FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 273 TANK FARM RD #BAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438741CERSID: 556951SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 273 TANK FARM RD #BAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: CERS HAZ WASTE: Site 2 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 CUPAListings273TANKFARMRD #B N/A B25 CERS HAZWASTECOMPLETEAUTOMOTIVE S110743515 TC6926581.2s Page 86 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-10-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-15-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: HMBP has been updated for CY 2019.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-27-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10438741CERSID: 556951SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 273 TANK FARM RD #BAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: CERS: 120.66550Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011125RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0000736FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 273 TANK FARM RD #BAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: 120.66550Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0000736RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0000736FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)S110743515 TC6926581.2s Page 87 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEntityTitle: DALEWHITSONEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: OwnerEntityTitle: SAMEEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: compliance. HMBP has been updated and submitted electronically. Facility infullEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-06-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Business Plan. Facility in good ord Electronic submittal has been completed for HazardousMaterialsEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-04-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: submittal has been completed. HMBP is current and up to date. Willl check to confirm that webbasedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-17-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued) S110743515 TC6926581.2s Page 88 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 273 TANK FARM RD #BAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 273 TANK FARM RD SUITEBAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JohnRoweEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JohnRoweEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 801-4421,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 273 TANKFARMAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ROWE, JOHNEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 801-7020,Affiliation Phone: 93465AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: TEMPLETONAffiliationCity: 1545 TEMPLETONROADAffiliationAddress: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)S110743515 TC6926581.2s Page 89 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 801-4421,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JohnRoweEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued) S110743515 NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: DANNYCRAMEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCEINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: SALES@CCMOFFROAD.COMContactEmail: 805-543-1664ContactFax: 805-543-1662ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: DANNYCRAMERContactName: CAL000401523EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCEINCHandlerName: 20141024DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Site 3 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 275 TANK FARM RD CAL000401523 B26 RCRA NonGen / NLRCCMOFFROAD & PERFORMANCE INC 1024846945 TC6926581.2s Page 90 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-1662Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: DANNYCRAMEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCE INC (Continued)1024846945 TC6926581.2s Page 91 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENTSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56299NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCEINCHandlerName: 20141024ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-610-6293Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93405Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1879 HUASNADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCEINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCE INC (Continued) 1024846945 NMD002208627TSDEPAID: CAL000344716Gepaid: 2018Year: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055472333Telephone: JOHNROWEContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: HAZNET: Site 4 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 HWTS273TANKFARMRDSTEB N/A B27 HAZNETCOMPLETEAUTOMOTIVE S113467304 TC6926581.2s Page 92 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: DEMENNO- KERDOONTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ALL PHASEENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000253361TransEPAID: 006879301JJKManifestID: 20100414ReceiptDate: 8/3/2010 18:30:27CreationDate: 20100409ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.462QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: DEMENNO- KERDOONTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ALL PHASEENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000253361TransEPAID: 007746663JJKManifestID: 20101023ReceiptDate: 1/3/2011 18:30:39CreationDate: 20101015ShipmentDate: CAL000344716GenEPAID: 2010Year: Additional Info: 0.924Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: percent 134 - Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than10CAWasteCode: CAT080013352TSDEPAID: CAL000344716Gepaid: 2010Year: 0.14000Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued) S113467304 TC6926581.2s Page 93 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934017509FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBFacilityAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2009-07-09 10:00:32.51700IssuedEPAIDDate: General AutomotiveRepairNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: 2009-07-09 10:00:32.517CreateDate: CAL000344716EPAID: NAICS: GROVER BEACH, CA93433City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 889 NAPLESSTContactAddress: JOHNROWEContactName: GROVER BEACH, CA934330000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 889 NAPLESSTOwnerAddress: JOHNROWEOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 07/14/2020LastActDate: 07/09/2009CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000344716EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.462QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued) S113467304 TC6926581.2s Page 94 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.659833Longitude: 35.248333Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: 04/18/2020Expiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 04/18/2016EffectiveDate: 04/18/2016AdoptionDate: NotreportedNPDESNumber: 34015WQ06WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: 401CertificationRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: CERFILLEXCProgram: 3Region: NotreportedSIC/NAICS: Dredge/FillSitePlace/Project Type: Po Box 1332, San Luis Obispo, CA93406AgencyAddress: Chevron Environmental Management Company San LuisObispoAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: 34015WQ06 SLO TANK FARM REMEDIATION ANDRESTORATIONName: CIWQS: Site 24 of 25 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 127 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA N/A A28 CIWQS34015WQ06SLOTANKFARMREMEDIATIONANDRESTORATIO S121615784 NotreportedOtherMineralsorMaterials: NotreportedGangueMineralsorMaterials: NotreportedOreMineralsorMaterials: PastProducerDevelopmentStatus: NotreportedProductionSize: NotreportedDepositType: SurfaceOperationType: NotreportedTertiaryCommodities: NotreportedSecondaryCommodities: Stone, Crushed/BrokenPrimaryCommodities: UnitedStatesCountry: NARegion: 0060790225MAS/MILS Identification Number: NotreportedMRDSIdentificationNumber: https://mrdata.usgs.gov/mrds/show-mrds.php?dep_id=10213557URL: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA93401City,State,Zip: 10213557DepositidentificationNumber: NotreportedAddress: GRAVELPITName: MINES MRDS: Site 1 of 2 in cluster C 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 178 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 N/A C29 MINESMRDSGRAVELPIT 1025691207 TC6926581.2s Page 95 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.65177Longitude: 35.24997Latitude: NotreportedDiscoveryInformation: NotreportedProductionHistory: NotreportedFoundBefore/After YD: NotreportedYearDiscovered: NotreportedEndedBefore/After LPY: NotreportedLastProductionYear: NotreportedBeganBefore/After FPY: NotreportedFirstProductionYear: NotreportedReferences: NotreportedTectonicSetting: NotreportedStructuralCharacteristics: NotreportedAssociatedRockTypeCode: NotreportedAssociatedRockUnitName: NotreportedHostRockType: NotreportedHostRockUnitName: Ridenour, JamesReporter: NotreportedOreControls: UnidentifiedPitPreviousNames: NotreportedConcentrationProcesses: NotreportedAlterationProcesses: NotreportedMineralDepositModel: NotreportedWorkingsType: NotreportedOreBodyForm: GRAVEL PIT (Continued)1025691207 OtherOwnerType: FINISHMASTERINCOwnerName: INDIANAPOLIS, IN46204MailingCity,State,Zip: 115 W WASHINGTONSTMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: AWADLE@KPAONLINE.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 720-257-7296ContactTelephone: LAFAYETTE, CO80026ContactCity,State,Zip: 1380 FOREST PARKCIRCLEContactAddress: ALEXWADLEContactName: CAL000425793EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 277 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: FINISHMASTER BRANCH # 420HandlerName: 20170315DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Site 1 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 277 TANK FARM RD CAL000425793 D30 RCRA NonGen / NLRFINISHMASTERBRANCH # 420 1025870451 TC6926581.2s Page 96 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190628HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: YesRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: ALEXWADLEOperatorName: FINISHMASTER BRANCH # 420 (Continued)1025870451 TC6926581.2s Page 97 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: OTHER BUILDING MATERIALDEALERSNAICSDescription: 44419NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FINISHMASTER BRANCH # 420HandlerName: 20170315ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 317-263-2014Owner/Operator Telephone: INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 115 WEST WASHINGTONSTREETOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: FINISHMASTERINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 720-257-7296Owner/Operator Telephone: LAFAYETTE, CO80026Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1380 FOREST PARKCIRCLEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: ALEXWADLEOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: FINISHMASTER BRANCH # 420 (Continued) 1025870451 TC6926581.2s Page 98 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARM RD.Address: SAN LOUIS OBISPO TOWN AUTO SALVAGE INC.Name: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110064629763DFRURL: 110064629763RegistryID: 1017766617Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access discharge does not adversely affect water quality. requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110064629763RegistryID: FINDS: Site 2 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ECHO281TANKFARMRD. N/A D31 FINDSSANLOUISOBISPOTOWNAUTOSALVAGEINC. 1017766617 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0016033RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0009278FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 TANK FARMRDAddress: FINISHMASTER BRANCH #420Name: 120.66403Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015571RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0009278FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 TANK FARMRDAddress: FINISHMASTER BRANCH #420Name: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Site 3 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 277 TANK FARM RD N/A D32 CUPAListingsFINISHMASTERBRANCH #420 S111857588 TC6926581.2s Page 99 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66403Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015572RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0009278FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 TANK FARMRDAddress: FINISHMASTER BRANCH #420Name: 120.66403Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: FINISHMASTER BRANCH #420 (Continued) S111857588 Wetlands - Fill and DredgeMaterialCERSDescription: 815208CERSID: 368582SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: 34015WQ06 SLO TANK FARM REMEDIATION ANDRESTORATIONName: CERS: Site 25 of 25 in cluster A 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 127 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA N/A A33 CERS34015WQ06SLOTANKFARMREMEDIATIONANDRESTORATIO S121768354 NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: SKASARJIAN@GMAIL.COMContactEmail: 805-543-9251ContactFax: 805-543-9509ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: NICHOLASKASARJIANContactName: CAL000397875EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: KASARJIAN TRADING CO INC DBA SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEHandlerName: 20140613DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Site 4 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 281 TANK FARM RD CAL000397875 D34 RCRA NonGen / NLRKASARJIANTRADINGCOINCDBASANLUISAUTOSALVAGE 1024845098 TC6926581.2s Page 100 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: NICHOLASKASARJIANOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: KASARJIAN TRADING COINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: KASARJIAN TRADING CO INC DBA SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)1024845098 TC6926581.2s Page 101 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND ACCESSORIESSTORESNAICSDescription: 44131NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: KASARJIAN TRADING CO INC DBA SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEHandlerName: 20140613ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-9509Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KASARJIAN TRADING COINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-9509Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: NICHOLASKASARJIANOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: KASARJIAN TRADING CO INC DBA SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) 1024845098 TC6926581.2s Page 102 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: KASARJIAN TRADING CO INC DBA SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) 1024845098 additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110066154468RegistryID: FINDS: Site 5 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 275 TANK FARM RD N/A B35 FINDSCCMPRODUCTSNAINC 1023321669 additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110065190144RegistryID: FINDS: Site 5 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 281 TANK FARM RD N/A D36 FINDSSANLUISAUTOSALVAGE 1023231793 discharge does not adversely affect water quality. requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110070093750RegistryID: FINDS: Site 6 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ECHO281TANKFARMROAD N/A D37 FINDSSANLUISAUTOSALVAGE 1023696673 TC6926581.2s Page 103 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110070093750DFRURL: 110070093750RegistryID: 1023696673Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)1023696673 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: KASARJIAN TRADING CO INC DBA SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110070418246DFRURL: 110070418246RegistryID: 1024629859Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110070418246RegistryID: FINDS: Site 7 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ECHO281TANKFARMRD N/A D38 FINDSKASARJIANTRADINGCOINCDBASANLUISAUTOSALVAGE 1024629859 Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10437838CERSID: 555390SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS CIWQS WDSSite8of12inclusterD 1 ft.NPDES Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 EMISANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 CUPAListings281TANKFARMRD N/A D39 CERS HAZWASTESANLUISAUTOSALVAGE S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 104 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.0020824CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.0006739852ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.0007672TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7549SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2883FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2019Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: EMI: 120.66418Longitude: 35.24695Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002294RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0002294FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: 120.66418Longitude: 35.24695Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015548RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0002294FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: 120.66418Longitude: 35.24695Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006842RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0002294FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 105 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/17/2014ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I024911WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 447157RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncDischargeName: 281 Tank FarmRoadDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 06/17/2014EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I024911WDID: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: 447157RegulatoryMeasureID: 0AgencyNumber: 3Region: CAS000001NPDESNumber: ActiveFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: NPDES: 0.00067544288Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.00067952ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.00063568SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.00966672NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 106 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAS000001NPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 5015-Motor Vehicle Parts, UsedPrimarySic: 29-JUN-15CertificationDate: PRESIDENTCertifierTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANCertifier: San LuisCreekReceivingWaterName: NDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: 805-801-0306EmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: nkasarjian@hotmail.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-543-9509OperatorContactPhone: PresidentOperatorContactTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 281 Tank FarmRoadOperatorAddress: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncOperatorName: nkasarjian@hotmail.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-543-9509ContactPhone: PresidentContactTitle: NicholasKasarjianContact: AcresPlaceSizeUnit: 4.5PlaceSize: 06/17/2014StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 06/17/2014ProcessedDate: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 107 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 281 Tank FarmRoadDischargeAddress: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 06/17/2014EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I024911WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 447157RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 108 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 447157RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 281 Tank FarmRoadOperatorAddress: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncOperatorName: 06/17/2014StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I024911WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 109 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: 805-801-0306EmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: nkasarjian@hotmail.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-543-9509OperatorContactPhone: PresidentOperatorContactTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 281 Tank FarmRoadOperatorAddress: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncOperatorName: nkasarjian@hotmail.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-543-9509ContactPhone: PresidentContactTitle: NicholasKasarjianContact: AcresPlaceSizeUnit: 4.5PlaceSize: 06/17/2014StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 06/17/2014ProcessedDate: 06/17/2014ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I024911WDID: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 110 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 281 Tank FarmRoadDischargeAddress: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 06/17/2014EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I024911WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 447157RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 5015-Motor Vehicle Parts, UsedPrimarySic: 29-JUN-15CertificationDate: PRESIDENTCertifierTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANCertifier: San LuisCreekReceivingWaterName: NDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 111 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSICCode2: 0SICCode: Agency Type: 8055439509AgencyTelephone: TODD SWENSONCARLJORGENSENAgencyContact: San Luis Obispo934017509AgencyCity,St,Zip: 281 Tank FarmRdAgencyAddress: SLO TOWN AUTO SALVAGEINCAgencyName: NotreportedFacilityContact: 8055439509FacilityTelephone: 3Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining7NPDESNumber: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge thatisFacilityStatus: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquidorFacilityType: Central Coastal40I009977FacilityID: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 281 Tank FarmRdAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: WDS: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 112 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 281 Tank Farm Rd, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: San Louis Obispo Town Auto SalvageIncAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: 120.6645Longitude: 35.24662Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 06/17/2014EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I024911WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 5015SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Motor Vehicle Parts, UsedPlace/Project Type: 281 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, suchasComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional boardorderTreatToWater: NotreportedPOTW: NotreportedReclamation: 0BaselineFlow: 0DesignFlow: NotreportedSecondaryWasteType: NotreportedSecondaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedWaste2: NotreportedWasteType2: NotreportedPrimaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 113 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Z Submit Portal" database. G HazMat Business Plan has been updated for CY 2018 and submitted via "EEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-27-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Submit Portal". HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 & submitted electronically via "EZEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-31-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: line - facility is in full compl Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated and submittedonEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-07-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10437838CERSID: 555390SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: CERS: 120.66097Longitude: 35.24684Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: 06/18/2014TerminationDate: 05/27/1993EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I009977WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 5015SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Motor Vehicle Parts, UsedPlace/Project Type: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 114 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-9509,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.663820Longitude: 35.246780Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10437838ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEFacilityName: 555390SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: for their private vehicles. W Facility generates waste motor oil, gasoline/diesel used byemployeesEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-29-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: web based database electronic An updated Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been submitted totheEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-29-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 115 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 281 TANKFARMAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KASARJIAN TRADING COMPANY, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: PRESIDENTEntityTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 281 TANK FARMRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 281 TANK FARM RD.Affiliation Address: NotreportedEntityTitle: NICHOLASKASARJIANEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEEntityName: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 116 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 281 Tank FarmRoadAffiliationAddress: OperatorEntityTitle: Kasarjian Trading CompanyIncEntityName: Owner/OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: SMARTS,Eval Source: INDSTWEvalProgram: WaterBoardsEvalDivision: waste oil drum storage. 09Jan19 sample. Recommend new BMP = secondary contaiment pallets for readily available. Ad Hoc review - no NAL discharge exceedances in sheen in puddles, no spills in parts storage shelves, spill kits compliant. Site vehicle and parts storage very orderly, no signs of SWPPP up to date, non-SW & sample inspection records accurate, andEvalNotes: Industrial Storm Water ComplianceEvaluationEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-07-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: SMARTS,Eval Source: INDSTWEvalProgram: WaterBoardsEvalDivision: the facility has an appropriate monitoring plan. needs to update their spill kit. The Water Board needs to verify that areas of staining and motor parts that were not covered. The facility but did let us complete an inspection. The team observed multiple 06/01/2014, was not able to find the facilities SWPPP upon request, me for the inspection. Mr. Kasarjian, who acquired the property on San Luis Obispo. Also, student assistant James Pilkington accompanied Conducted inspection with Joe Little and Aaron Floyd from the CityofEvalNotes: Industrial Storm Water ComplianceEvaluationEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-18-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Industrial Facility StormWaterCERSDescription: 829924CERSID: 541688SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 281 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: 805) 543-9509,Affiliation Phone: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) S106091766 TC6926581.2s Page 117 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4197907.2589YCoordinates: 13430820.24XCoordinates: 0FinancialAssuranceCostEstimateforreclamation: 7899.67Totalamountoffundspostedbythemineforreclamation: NotreportedNumberofacrespermittedforminingdisturbance: M800902:1Conditionalusepermitidentificationnumber: NotreportedOtherproductsproducedbythemine: RockPrimaryproductproducedbythemine: NotreportedReclamationplanidentificationnumber: NotreportedOwnerCounty: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93405OwnerCity, State, Zip: 252 DALYAVENUEOwnerAddress: DAMON & DOLLYGARCIAMineowner: NotreportedOperatorCounty: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93405OperatorCity, State, Zip: 252 DALYAVENUEOperatorAddress: DAMON-GARCIAMineoperator: RECLAMATION CERTIFIED COMPLETE BY LEADAGENCYStatusofminereclamation: RECLAIMEDStatusofminingoperation: 0Numberofacresdisturbedbythemine: 2Typeofreportsubmittedbyoperator: 2009Yearoftheoperatorsuppliedannualreport: County of San LuisObispoLeadAgencyname: 40LeadAgencyidentificationcode: 120.651111Longitude: 35.25Latitude: CACity,State,Zip: 547 PRADOROADAddress: BRUGHELLIPITName: MINES: Site 2 of 2 in cluster C 1 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 190 ft. 1/8 , CA 547 PRADO ROAD N/A C40 MINESBRUGHELLIPIT S117661190 STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110065574293RegistryID: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110070590642RegistryID: FINDS: Site 9 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 277 TANK FARM RD N/A D41 FINDSFINISHMASTERBRANCH # 420 1023267772 TC6926581.2s Page 118 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access FINISHMASTER BRANCH # 420 (Continued)1023267772 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110066552242DFRURL: 110066552242RegistryID: 1023358272Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110066552242RegistryID: FINDS: Site 6 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ECHO273TANKFARMRDSTEB N/A B42 FINDSCOMPLETEAUTOMOTIVE 1023358272 ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110065625470RegistryID: FINDS: Site 7 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ECHO271TANKFARMRD N/A B43 FINDSDYER’S DIESELRO 1023272495 TC6926581.2s Page 119 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 271 TANK FARMRDAddress: DYER’SDIESELROName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110065625470DFRURL: 110065625470RegistryID: 1023272495Envid: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)1023272495 Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Sinor-LaVallee Wine Co. LLCEntityName: Owner andOperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Valor Wine Co. LLCEntityName: InterestedPartyAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Waste DischargeRequirementsCERSDescription: 848092CERSID: 440692SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 271 TANKFARMAddress: VALOR WINE CO., LLCName: CERS: Site 8 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 271 TANK FARM N/A B44 CERSVALORWINECO., LLC S122492435 PR0006841RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002293FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 271 TANK FARMRDAddress: DYER’S DIESELROINCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: HWTSSite9of13inclusterB 1 ft.CIWQS Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/8 WDRSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 HAZNET271TANKFARMRD N/A B45 CUPAListingsDYER’S DIESELRO S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 120 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.75Tons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: NED981723513TSDEPAID: CAL000323759Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.125Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000323759Gepaid: 2017Year: PO BOX3738MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055412049Telephone: MIKEDYERContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 271 TANK FARMRDAddress: DYER’SDIESELROName: HAZNET: 120.66500Longitude: 35.25599Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002293RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0002293FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 271 TANK FARMRDAddress: DYER’S DIESELROINCName: 120.66500Longitude: 35.25599Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001767RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0002293FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 271 TANK FARMRDAddress: DYER’S DIESELROINCName: 120.66500Longitude: 35.25599Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 121 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D018RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINTransName: NED981723513TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SVCINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 006245980SKSManifestID: 20171113ReceiptDate: 10/4/2018 18:30:16CreationDate: 20171031ShipmentDate: CAL000323759GenEPAID: 2017Year: Additional Info: 0.396Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD028409019TSDEPAID: CAL000323759Gepaid: 2013Year: 1.3761Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAD008302903TSDEPAID: CAL000323759Gepaid: 2014Year: 0.374Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD028409010TSDEPAID: CAL000323759Gepaid: 2015Year: 0.3Tons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: NED981723513TSDEPAID: CAL000323759Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.47955Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000323759Gepaid: 2016Year: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 122 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: D001AdditionalCode2: D008AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 1500WasteQuantity: 0.75QuantityTons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelMethCode: D018RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINTransName: NED981723513TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005933999SKSManifestID: 20170505ReceiptDate: 5/12/2018 18:31:33CreationDate: 20170412ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.05QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS OF WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SVCINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 006245358SKSManifestID: 20170929ReceiptDate: 5/30/2018 18:33:22CreationDate: 20170914ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: D001AdditionalCode2: D008AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 300WasteQuantity: 0.15QuantityTons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelMethCode: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 123 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.396QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D018RCRACode: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureWasteCodeDescription: CROSBY & OVERTONTSDFAltName: CAD028409019TSDFAltEPAID: CROSBY & OVERTONTransName: CAD028409019TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TransEPAID: 012237428JJKManifestID: 20131227ReceiptDate: 2/24/2014 22:15:29CreationDate: 20131223ShipmentDate: CAL000323759GenEPAID: 2013Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS OF WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEANHARBORSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991510SKSManifestID: 20170426ReceiptDate: 5/21/2018 18:33:13CreationDate: 20170412ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 124 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2014Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.187QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D018RCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CROSBY & OVERTONTransName: CAD028409010TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: THERMO FLUIDSINCTransName: CAL000381082TransEPAID: 014183262JJKManifestID: 20151005ReceiptDate: 1/5/2016 22:35:46CreationDate: 20151001ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.187QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D018RCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CROSBY & OVERTONTransName: CAD028409010TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: THERMO FLUIDSINCTransName: CAL000381082TransEPAID: 014183262JJKManifestID: 20151005ReceiptDate: 1/5/2016 22:35:46CreationDate: 20151001ShipmentDate: CAL000323759GenEPAID: 2016Year: Additional Info: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 125 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1/5/2016 22:35:46CreationDate: 20151001ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.187QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D018RCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CROSBY & OVERTONTransName: CAD028409010TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: THERMO FLUIDSINCTransName: CAL000381082TransEPAID: 014183262JJKManifestID: 20151005ReceiptDate: 1/5/2016 22:35:46CreationDate: 20151001ShipmentDate: CAL000323759GenEPAID: 2015Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 330WasteQuantity: 1.3761QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: D018RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONSLLCTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 013455240JJKManifestID: 20140912ReceiptDate: 11/7/2014 22:15:10CreationDate: 20140909ShipmentDate: CAL000323759GenEPAID: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 126 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 35.24617Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: 3TTWQ: CComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: 0.001DesignFlow: 09/20/2022Expiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 07/06/2018EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: NotreportedNPDESNumber: 30400618618WDID: R3-2017-0020OrderNumber: Enrollee - WaiverRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: WDRINDFPProgram: 3Region: NotreportedSIC/NAICS: WineryPlace/Project Type: 445 Beech Street, Arroyo Grande, CA93420AgencyAddress: Sinor-LaVallee Wine Co. LLCAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 271 TANK FARMROADAddress: VALOR WINE CO., LLCName: CIWQS: ACTIVE - WDRStatus: WDR100040104GlobalID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 271 TANK FARMROADAddress: VALOR WINE CO., LLCName: WDR: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.187QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D018RCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CROSBY & OVERTONTransName: CAD028409010TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: THERMO FLUIDSINCTransName: CAL000381082TransEPAID: 014183262JJKManifestID: 20151005ReceiptDate: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 TC6926581.2s Page 127 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934010000FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 271 TANK FARMRDFacilityAddress: DYER’SDIESELROFacilityName: 2018-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 2007-08-17 11:27:29.80000IssuedEPAIDDate: General AutomotiveRepairNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: 2007-08-17 11:27:29.813CreateDate: CAL000323759EPAID: NAICS: NIPOMO, CA93444City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 510 SANDRACOURTContactAddress: MIKEDYERContactName: NIPOMO, CA934440000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 210 SANDRACOURTOwnerAddress: DYERS DIESELROINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93403MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: PO BOX3738MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 10/09/2018LastActDate: 08/17/2007CreateDate: 06/30/2018InactiveDate: CAL000323759EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 271 TANK FARMRDAddress: DYER’SDIESELROName: HWTS: 120.664769Longitude: DYER’S DIESELRO (Continued)S110743693 SECURTIS3@AOL.COMContactEmail: 805-547-2334ContactFax: 805-547-2333ContactTelephone: GROVER BEACH, CA93433ContactCity,State,Zip: 889 NAPLESSTContactAddress: JOHNROWEContactName: CAL000344716EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7509HandlerCity,State,Zip: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBHandlerAddress: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEHandlerName: 20090709DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Site 10 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 273 TANK FARM RD STE B CAL000344716 B46 RCRA NonGen / NLRCOMPLETEAUTOMOTIVE 1024823607 TC6926581.2s Page 128 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: JOHNROWEOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: JOHNROWEOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7509MailingCity,State,Zip: 273 TANK FARM RD STEBMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)1024823607 TC6926581.2s Page 129 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: COMPLETEAUTOMOTIVEHandlerName: 20090709ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-547-2333Owner/Operator Telephone: GROVER BEACH, CA93433Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 889 NAPLESSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JOHNROWEOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-801-4421Owner/Operator Telephone: GROVER BEACH, CA 93433-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 889 NAPLESSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JOHNROWEOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued) 1024823607 TC6926581.2s Page 130 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued) 1024823607 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDAddress: CCM OFFROAD & PERFORMANCEINCName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110070415934DFRURL: 110070415934RegistryID: 1024627547Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110070415934RegistryID: FINDS: Site 11 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ECHO275TANKFARMRD N/A B47 FINDSCCMOFFROAD & PERFORMANCE INC 1024627547 Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439131CERSID: 556146SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDAddress: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: Site 12 of 13 in cluster B 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 CUPAListings275TANKFARMRD N/A B48 CERS HAZWASTECCMOFFROADANDPERFORMANCE, INC S110744133 TC6926581.2s Page 131 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12-12-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Submit Portal. No violations n HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 electronically and sbmitted viaEZEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-15-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-08-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10439131CERSID: 556146SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDAddress: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INCName: CERS: 120.66376Longitude: 35.24664Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011421RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0007401FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDAddress: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INCName: 120.66376Longitude: 35.24664Latitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0014010RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0761ProgramElementCode: FA0007401FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 275 TANK FARMRDAddress: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INC (Continued) S110744133 TC6926581.2s Page 132 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: CUBIC FEET. FACILITY HAS SUBMIT BUSINESS STORES ARGON GAS AND ARGON MIXTURES IN QUANTITIES ABOVE200EvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-08-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: containment for used oil drums. Items marked N/A not reviewed during inspection. ProvidesecondaryEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-28-2021EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: HMBP has been updated and submitted.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-23-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: EZ Submit Portal for CY 2018. HazMat Business Plan has been updated and submitted electronicallyviaEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-03-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via E Z Submit Porta Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-29-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via "EZ Submit Portal An updated Hazardous Materials Business Plan has beensubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INC (Continued) S110744133 TC6926581.2s Page 133 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 275 Tank Farm Rd.Affiliation Address: NotreportedEntityTitle: DannyCramerEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 610-8293,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 275 TANK FARM Rd.Affiliation Address: NotreportedEntityTitle: CRAMER, DANNYEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DannyCramerEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.664130Longitude: 35.246780Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10439131ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INCFacilityName: 556146SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-19-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INC (Continued) S110744133 TC6926581.2s Page 134 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CCM PRODUCTS, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-1662,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DannyCramerEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 801-7020,Affiliation Phone: 93465AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: TempletonAffiliationCity: 1545 Templeton Rd.Affiliation Address: NotreportedEntityTitle: John DaleWhitsonEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: PresidentEntityTitle: DannyCramerEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 275 TANK FARMRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CCM OFF ROAD AND PERFORMANCE, INC (Continued) S110744133 TC6926581.2s Page 135 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: CAT080013352TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2014Year: 0.06255Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 461 - PaintsludgeCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2015Year: 0.06255Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 291 - LatexwasteCAWasteCode: AZR000501510TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.0468Tons: H020 - SolventsRecoveryDisposalMethod: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: MXC130619001TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.1Tons: H020 - SolventsRecoveryDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: MXC130619001TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.054Tons: H020 - SolventsRecoveryDisposalMethod: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: MXC130619001TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2017Year: 277 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055460494Telephone: MELANIE FABING -Contact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 277 TANK FARMRDAddress: D’ANGELOS & SONSINCName: HAZNET: Site 10 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 HWTS277TANKFARMRD N/A D49 HAZNETD’ANGELOS & SONS INC S113157037 TC6926581.2s Page 136 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: D001AdditionalCode2: F003AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 16WasteQuantity: 0.0576QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: F005RCRACode: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 006395799JJKManifestID: 20110225ReceiptDate: 4/22/2011 18:30:53CreationDate: 20110217ShipmentDate: CAL000346245GenEPAID: 2011Year: Additional Info: 0.0576Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2011Year: 0.06255Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.06255Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 461 - PaintsludgeCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000346245Gepaid: 2013Year: 0.051Tons: D’ANGELOS & SONS INC (Continued) S113157037 TC6926581.2s Page 137 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D001RCRACode: 461 - PaintsludgeWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVSVSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: ENVIRONMENTAL LOGISTICSINCTransName: CAR000217513TransEPAID: 010969905JJKManifestID: 20130425ReceiptDate: 6/18/2013 22:15:07CreationDate: 20130408ShipmentDate: CAL000346245GenEPAID: 2013Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D001RCRACode: 461 - PaintsludgeWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEANHARBORSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: ENVIRONMENTAL LOGISTICSINCTransName: CAR000217513TransEPAID: 013482839JJKManifestID: 20150305ReceiptDate: 6/25/2015 22:15:36CreationDate: 20150212ShipmentDate: CAL000346245GenEPAID: 2016Year: Additional Info: D’ANGELOS & SONS INC (Continued) S113157037 TC6926581.2s Page 138 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2014Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H020 - SolventsRecoveryMethCode: D001RCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RECICLADORA TEMARRY DE MEXICO SA DECVTransName: MXC130619001TSDFEPAID: TEMARRY RECYCLINGINCTrans2Name: CAR000194217Trans2EPAID: HCI ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERINGSERVICETransName: CAR000176826TransEPAID: 010389259FLEManifestID: 20170407ReceiptDate: 5/11/2018 18:34:02CreationDate: 20170329ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: D001AdditionalCode3: D035AdditionalCode2: F003AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.054QuantityTons: H020 - SolventsRecoveryMethCode: F005RCRACode: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RECICLADORA TEMARRY DE MEXICO SA DECVTransName: MXC130619001TSDFEPAID: TEMARRY RECYCLINGINCTrans2Name: CAR000194217Trans2EPAID: HCI ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERINGSERVICETransName: CAR000176826TransEPAID: 010389259FLEManifestID: 20170407ReceiptDate: 5/11/2018 18:34:02CreationDate: 20170329ShipmentDate: CAL000346245GenEPAID: 2017Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: D’ANGELOS & SONS INC (Continued)S113157037 TC6926581.2s Page 139 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D001RCRACode: 461 - PaintsludgeWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEANHARBORSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: ENVIRONMENTAL LOGISTICSINCTransName: CAR000217513TransEPAID: 013482839JJKManifestID: 20150305ReceiptDate: 6/25/2015 22:15:36CreationDate: 20150212ShipmentDate: CAL000346245GenEPAID: 2015Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.051QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: D018RCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: DEMENNO / KERDOONTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ASBURY ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD028277036TransEPAID: 011876474JJKManifestID: 20140213ReceiptDate: 4/9/2014 22:15:13CreationDate: 20140207ShipmentDate: CAL000346245GenEPAID: D’ANGELOS & SONS INC (Continued) S113157037 TC6926581.2s Page 140 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2009-09-01 15:38:37.66000IssuedEPAIDDate: Other Building MaterialDealersNAICSDescription: 44419NAICSCode: 2009-09-01 15:38:37.677CreateDate: CAL000346245EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 277 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: MELANIE FABING -Contact Name: OXNARD, CA930307408OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 1114 INDUSTRIALAVEOwnerAddress: D’ANGELO & SONS INC.Owner Name: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 277 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 09/15/2016LastActDate: 09/01/2009CreateDate: 06/30/2017InactiveDate: CAL000346245EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 277 TANK FARMRDAddress: D’ANGELOS & SONSINCName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: D001AdditionalCode2: F003AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: F005RCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEANHARBORSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: ENVIRONMENTAL LOGISTICSINCTransName: CAR000217513TransEPAID: 009943890JJKManifestID: 20120604ReceiptDate: 9/17/2012 22:15:21CreationDate: 20120517ShipmentDate: CAL000346245GenEPAID: 2012Year: Additional Info: D’ANGELOS & SONS INC (Continued)S113157037 TC6926581.2s Page 141 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934017509FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 277 TANK FARMRDFacilityAddress: D’ANGELOS & SONSINCFacilityName: 2017-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: D’ANGELOS & SONS INC (Continued) S113157037 0.493Tons: Site H111 - Stabilization Or Chemical Fixation Prior To Disposal AtAnotherDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2009Year: 0.85Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2009Year: 0.374Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2010Year: 0.544Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD980884183TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2010Year: 281 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055439509Telephone: RANDYJORGENSENContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: HAZNET: Site 11 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 HWTS281TANKFARMRD N/A D50 HAZNETSANLUISAUTOSALVAGE S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 142 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 006386047JJKManifestID: 20100719ReceiptDate: 9/10/2010 18:31:02CreationDate: 20100712ShipmentDate: CAL000208475GenEPAID: 2010Year: Additional Info: 1 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 0.3Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD982444481TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2003Year: 0.255Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: CAT080013352TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2003Year: 0.374Tons: Disposal Method: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2006Year: 0.748Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2006Year: 0.748Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2007Year: 1.088Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000208475Gepaid: 2008Year: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 143 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003471275JJKManifestID: 20080911ReceiptDate: 1/28/2009 18:30:25CreationDate: 20080827ShipmentDate: CAL000208475GenEPAID: 2008Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003472377JJKManifestID: 20100409ReceiptDate: 12/3/2010 18:31:11CreationDate: 20100318ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 160WasteQuantity: 0.544QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: GEM RANCHO CORDOVA LLC DBA PSCENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAD980884183TSDFEPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTrans2Name: CAR000177527Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 144 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 000481436JJKManifestID: 20080226ReceiptDate: 8/6/2008 18:30:08CreationDate: 20080211ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003471157JJKManifestID: 20080709ReceiptDate: 11/18/2008 18:30:17CreationDate: 20080619ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 145 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GQuantityUnit: 75WasteQuantity: 0.255QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT080013352TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 22065002ManifestID: 20030211ReceiptDate: 5/18/2003 14:34:25CreationDate: 20030204ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 600WasteQuantity: 0.3QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982444481TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982444481TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 22065003ManifestID: 20030212ReceiptDate: 5/19/2003 18:31:05CreationDate: 20030204ShipmentDate: CAL000208475GenEPAID: 2003Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.34QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 146 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 000481062JJKManifestID: 20060918ReceiptDate: 7/11/2007 18:30:11CreationDate: 20060907ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 000483073JJKManifestID: 20070103ReceiptDate: 10/30/2008 18:30:32CreationDate: 20061219ShipmentDate: CAL000208475GenEPAID: 2006Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 147 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20090728ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003472348JJKManifestID: 20091220ReceiptDate: 6/29/2010 18:30:46CreationDate: 20091203ShipmentDate: CAL000208475GenEPAID: 2009Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: PHILIP TRANSPORATION & REMEDIATIONINCTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 24390686ManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: 7/7/2006 18:31:23CreationDate: 20060314ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 148 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 000481262JJKManifestID: 20071029ReceiptDate: 7/16/2008 18:30:27CreationDate: 20071008ShipmentDate: CAL000208475GenEPAID: 2007Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 145WasteQuantity: 0.493QuantityTons: Site H111 - Stabilization Or Chemical Fixation Prior To Disposal AtAnotherMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003471474JJKManifestID: 20090208ReceiptDate: 6/16/2009 18:30:21CreationDate: 20090206ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 140WasteQuantity: 0.476QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003472158JJKManifestID: 20090807ReceiptDate: 1/8/2010 18:30:28CreationDate: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 149 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 21843757ManifestID: 20020925ReceiptDate: 2/18/2003 18:31:24CreationDate: 20020916ShipmentDate: CAL000208475GenEPAID: 2002Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIAL SERVICESINCTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 000483333JJKManifestID: 20070521ReceiptDate: 8/20/2008 18:30:08CreationDate: 20070504ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.374QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 150 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 281 TANK FARMRDOwnerAddress: SLO TOWN AUTO SALVAGEINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 281 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 01/09/2015LastActDate: 03/10/1999CreateDate: 06/30/2014InactiveDate: CAL000208475EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 281 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 1000WasteQuantity: 0.5QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 21300118ManifestID: 20020227ReceiptDate: 10/9/2002 6:49:14CreationDate: 20020213ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 0.2QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued)S113106145 TC6926581.2s Page 151 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934010000FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 281 TANK FARMRDFacilityAddress: SAN LUIS AUTOSALVAGEFacilityName: 2014-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 1999-03-10 00:00:00IssuedEPAIDDate: Recyclable MaterialWholesalersNAICSDescription: 42193NAICSCode: 2002-03-14 16:36:29.000CreateDate: CAL000208475EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 281 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: RANDYJORGENSENContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE (Continued) S113106145 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 TANK FARMRDAddress: FINISHMASTER BRANCH # 420Name: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110070590642DFRURL: 110070590642RegistryID: 1025910161Envid: ECHO: Site 12 of 12 in cluster D 1 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 277 TANK FARM RD N/A D51 ECHOFINISHMASTERBRANCH # 420 1025910161 NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 10 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster E 0.002 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SSW N/A E52 PFASWELL01 S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 152 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 4.2Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 153 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 5.4Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 154 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 155 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 156 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 157 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 158 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 TC6926581.2s Page 159 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000770GeoTrackerURL: 120.66543Longitude: 35.242284Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000770-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000770GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520831 110013859128RegistryID: FINDS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10435984CERSID: 39637SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMRDAddress: JEFFERISAUTOBODYName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 23 ft.CERSSite13of13inclusterB 0.004 mi.EMI Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW FINDS269TANKFARMROAD N/A B53 CERS HAZWASTEJEFFERISAUTOBODY 1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 160 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1997Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: EMI: 120.66438Longitude: 35.24664Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0009368RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0006093FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMRDAddress: JEFFERISAUTOBODYName: 120.66438Longitude: 35.24664Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0013929RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0006093FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMRDAddress: JEFFERISAUTOBODYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 161 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2000Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 1TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1999Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 1TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1998Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 162 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2003Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2002Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2001Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 163 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2006Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 191664ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 198TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2005Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.42108ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.435TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2004Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 164 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2009Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1926405ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 195TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2008Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1860496ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 1922TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2007Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93291City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1860496ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 1922TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 165 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 40CountyCode: 2019Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: NotreportedPart. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: NotreportedParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.0286491ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.029TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2018Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.0612498ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.062TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2010Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.1116327ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.113TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 166 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation JEFFERISAUTOBODYEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.664450Longitude: 35.246780Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10435984ProgramID: HWGEnvIntTypeCode: JEFFERISAUTOBODYFacilityName: 39637SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-17-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: limits and will be inactivated as This shop maintains chemical inventory below the programthresholdEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-30-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10435984CERSID: 39637SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMRDAddress: JEFFERISAUTOBODYName: CERS: NotreportedPart. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: NotreportedParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.0340874895ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.034505TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 7532SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 257FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 167 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: SANLUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 269 TANK FARMRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: TOM OR LEAJEFFERISEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110013859128CERSID: 474605SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7509City,State,Zip: 269 TANK FARMROADAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 269 TANK FARMRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 269 TANK FARMRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: TOM OR LEAJEFFERISEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1006826772 TC6926581.2s Page 168 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: inspection. No violation. Returned to compliance on 10/20/2020. Business plan updatedduringViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 10-20-2020ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: PRODUCT ANTIFREEZE CONTAINERS. Returned to compliance on 03/18/2015. LABEL WASTE ANTIFREEZEANDViolationNotes: Waste, and starting accumulation date. generator, physical and chemical characteristics of the Hazardous the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", name and address of the Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containerswithViolationDescription: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-25-2014ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: PLAN ELECTRONICALLY. Returned to compliance on 09/11/2017. SUBMIT THE EMERGENCYRESPONSEViolationNotes: hazardous material. response plan and procedures for a release or threatened release of a Failure to establish and electronically submit an adequateemergencyViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: Violations: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438540CERSID: 91427SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST #8Address: AM PACREPAIRName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 54 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster F 0.010 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 149 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE CUPAListings4149SANTAFEST #8 N/A F54 CERS HAZWASTEAMPACREPAIR S111464854 TC6926581.2s Page 169 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: COPY O INSPECTOR BY 10//25/14. NEW EMPLOYEE SINCE LAST INSPECTION COMMUNICATION TRAINING PROGRAM, CONDUCT TRAINING, DOCUMENT, AND SUBMIT Returned to compliance on 03/18/2015. DEVELOP EMPLOYEEHAZARDViolationNotes: Haz Waste Generator Program - Training - GeneralViolationDescription: Section(s) Multiple HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 09-25-2014ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: WASTE) ELECTRONICALLY, PREFERABLY AT WWW.EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG. 55-GAL LIQUID, 500LBS SOLID, 200 CUFT GAS, OR ANY AMOUNT OF HAZARDOUS Returned to compliance on 09/11/2017. SUBMIT THE CHEMICALINVENTORYViolationNotes: at or above reportable quantities. inventory information for all reportable hazardous materials on site Failure to complete and electronically submit hazardousmaterialViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: ELECTRONICALLY. Returned to compliance on 09/11/2017. SUBMIT AN ANNOTATED SITEMAPViolationNotes: required content. Failure to complete and electronically submit a site map withallViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: 781-4917 OR LFAULKNER@CO.SLO.CA.US TO SCHEDULE A REINSECTION. WASTE DISPOSAL RECORDS. CONTACT YOUR CUPA INSPECTOR LINNEA FAULKNER AT Returned to compliance on 09/11/2017. LOCATE 2016 AND 2017HAZARDOUSViolationNotes: designated facility which received the waste. for transport shall be kept until receiving a signed copy from the transporter. The manifest signed at the time the waste was accepted three years from the date the waste was accepted by the initial Failure to keep a copy of each properly signed manifest for atleastViolationDescription: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a) 22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)S111464854 TC6926581.2s Page 170 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-14-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: DATE OF REPORT ISSUANCE. THIS REPORT ISSUED ON JULY 5, 2017. COMPLIANCE TIME PERIOD STARTSFROMEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 04-25-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: 781-4917 OR LFAULKNER@CO.SLO.CA.US TO SCHEDULE A REINSPECTION. WASTE DISPOSAL RECORDS. CONTACT YOUR CUPA INSPECTOR LINNEA FAULKNER AT Returned to compliance on 09/11/2017. LOCATE 2016 AND 2017HAZARDOUSViolationNotes: Hazardous Waste Generator Program - Operations/Maintenance - GeneralViolationDescription: Section(s) Multiple HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: NUMBER. GO TO HWTS.DTSC.CA.GOV FOR APPLICATION AND INFORMATION. Returned to compliance on 09/11/2017. REACTIVATE YOUR CAL EPAIDViolationNotes: hazardous waste. disposing of, transporting or offering for transportation any Failure to obtain an Identification Number prior to treating, storing,Violation Description: 12, Section(s) 66262.12 22 CCR 12 66262.12 - California Code of Regulations, Title 22, ChapterCitation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: 91427SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: ELECTRONIC RESPONSE. USERNAMES ARE ALWAYS EMAIL ADDRESSES. YOU MUST APPLY FOR A USERNAME AND PASSWORD FIRST AND WAIT FOR AN BUSINESS PLAN ELECTRONICALLY, PREFERABLY AT WWW.EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG. Returned to compliance on 09/11/2017. SUBMIT THE HAZARDOUSMATERIALSViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: AM PACREPAIRSiteName: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)S111464854 TC6926581.2s Page 171 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-18-2015EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-16-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 10-20-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 09-25-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-11-2017EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-11-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)S111464854 TC6926581.2s Page 172 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 459-4724,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PaulLuizEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-14-2014EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-09-2014EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-14-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 04-25-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-20-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)S111464854 TC6926581.2s Page 173 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 459-4724,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4149 #8 SANTAFEAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: LUIZ, PAULEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4149 SANTA FE ST #8AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: san luisobispoAffiliationCity: 4149 santa fe #8AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PaulLuizEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: paulluizEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AM PACREPAIREntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)S111464854 TC6926581.2s Page 174 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.64537Longitude: 35.24300Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0014972RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0008908FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST #8Address: AM PACREPAIRName: 120.64537Longitude: 35.24300Latitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0018342RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0761ProgramElementCode: FA0008908FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST #8Address: AM PACREPAIRName: 120.64537Longitude: 35.24300Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0014973RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0710ProgramElementCode: FA0008908FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST #8Address: AM PACREPAIRName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: ownerEntityTitle: paulluizEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)S111464854 TC6926581.2s Page 175 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: PAUL LUIZ/OWNEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: PAULLUIZOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST UNIT8MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: P.LUIS@SBCGLOBAL.NETContactEmail: 805-541-2668ContactFax: 805-541-2719ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000ContactCity,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST UNIT8ContactAddress: PAUL LUIZ/OWNERContactName: CAL000230408EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST UNIT8HandlerAddress: AM PACREPAIRHandlerName: 20020305DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 54 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster F 0.010 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 149 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 4149 SANTA FE ST UNIT 8 CAL000230408 F55 RCRA NonGen / NLRAMPACREPAIR 1024801469 TC6926581.2s Page 176 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-459-4724Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 6474 EDNARDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: PAULLUIZOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-2719Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4149 SANTA FE ST UNIT8Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: PAUL LUIZ/OWNEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)1024801469 TC6926581.2s Page 177 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: AM PACREPAIRHandlerName: 20020305ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: AM PAC REPAIR (Continued)1024801469 SAES PARKER UHP COMPCORPOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 4175 B SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-546-0953ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 4175 B SANTA FERDContactAddress: TOMCOGSWELLContactName: CAR000013474EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4175 B SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: SAES PARKER UHP COMPCORPHandlerName: 19960628DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 55 ft. 0.010 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 146 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 4175 B SANTA FE RD CAR000013474 56 RCRA-SQGSAESPARKERUHPCOMPCORP 1001115412 TC6926581.2s Page 178 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20020627HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: SAES PARKER UHP COMP CORP (Continued)1001115412 TC6926581.2s Page 179 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: INDUSTRIAL VALVEMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 332911NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAES PARKER UHP COMPCORPHandlerName: 19960628ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-546-0953Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 B SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: SAES PARKER UHP COMPCORPOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: SAES PARKER UHP COMP CORP (Continued) 1001115412 T0607900038GlobalId: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607900038GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4155 SANTA FERDAddress: LAIDLAW TRANSITFACILITYName: LUST: 55 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster F 0.010 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 149 ft. 1/8 HISTCORTESESANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE Cortese4155SANTAFERD N/A F57 LUSTLAIDLAWTRANSITFACILITY S102432450 TC6926581.2s Page 180 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0607900038GlobalId: 11/27/1991StatusDate: Open - RemediationStatus: T0607900038GlobalId: 07/15/1991StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607900038GlobalId: 06/25/1991StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607900038GlobalId: 12/13/1990StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607900038GlobalId: LUST: Letter - NoticeAction: 08/24/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607900038GlobalId: LeakReportedAction: 11/27/1991Date: OtherActionType: T0607900038GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 12/13/1990Date: OtherActionType: T0607900038GlobalId: LUST: 8057817560PhoneNumber: NotreportedEmail: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: NotreportedAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFOrganizationName: UST CASEWORKERContactName: Local AgencyCaseworkerContactType: T0607900038GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedSiteHistory: DieselPotentialContaminantsofConcern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: NotreportedFileLocation: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFLocalAgency: 2055RBCaseNumber: NotreportedCaseWorker: 11/24/1993StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: 120.649104Longitude: 35.244074Latitude: LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACILITY (Continued) S102432450 TC6926581.2s Page 181 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedGrndWtrQualifier: NotreportedSoilQualifier: 35.244931 / -120.6490754Lat/Long: NRQMTBETested: Max MTBE Data: NotreportedMaxMTBESoil: NotreportedMaxMTBEGrndWtr: MTBE Class: NotreportedFunding: 0InterimAction: USTPilotProgram: 02/01/1992Monitoring: 11/27/91RemedialAction: NotreportedRemedialPlan: 07/15/1991PollutionChar: 6/25/91PrelimAssess: NotreportedWorkplan: NotreportedConfirmLeak: FJDStaffInitials: RegionalBoardLeadAgency: San Luis Obispo, San Luis ObispoCountyLocalAgency: NotreportedCrossStreet: NotreportedContact: P.O.BOX61660RPAddress: JOHNSNELGROVEResponsibleParty: NotreportedEnforcementType: 11/24/93CloseDate: NotreportedEnforceDate: 02/01/1993ReviewDate: NotreportedStopDate: 11/27/1991EnterDate: 12/13/90DiscoveredDate: 11/27/1991ReleaseDate: TankClosureHowDiscovered: NotreportedHowStopped: UNKLeakCause: TankLeakSource: UAbatementMethod: NotreportedQuantity: DieselSubstance: OCaseType: NotreportedLocalCaseNum: 2055CaseNumber: CaseClosedStatus: T0607900038GlobalID: San LuisObispoFacilityCounty: Central CoastRegionRegionalBoard: 3Region: LUST REG 3: 11/24/1993StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607900038GlobalId: 02/01/1992StatusDate: Open - VerificationMonitoringStatus: LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACILITY (Continued)S102432450 TC6926581.2s Page 182 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0607900038CERSID: 187139SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4155 SANTA FERDAddress: LAIDLAW TRANSITFACILITYName: CERS: 2055RegId: LTNKARegBy: 40FacilityCountyCode: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: 4155 SANTAFEedr_fadd1: LAIDLAW TRANSITFACILITYedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607900038GlobalID: NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4155 SANTA FERDAddress: LAIDLAW TRANSITFACILITYName: CORTESE: GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS CLEAND UP. AWAITING CLOSUREREPORTSummary: 4000641-002AssignedName: 0DistanceFromWell: WELL #2WellName: CREEKSIDE COMMERCIALCENTERWaterSystem: NotreportedOperator: NotreportedSuspended: NotreportedUSTCleanupFundID: 1Priority: NotreportedBeneficial: 10.24BasinPlan: NotreportedOrgName: 0MtbeFuel: 0MtbeConcentratn: LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACILITY (Continued)S102432450 TC6926581.2s Page 183 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8057817560,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: UST CASE WORKER - SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFEntityName: Local AgencyCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank CleanupSiteCERSDescription: LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACILITY (Continued) S102432450 PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60002343AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102300AliasName: EPA IdentificationNumberAliasType: CAN000903585AliasName: UEPotentialDescription: 30022-NOConfirmedCOC: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotentialCOC: UNKNOWNPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6491Longitude: 35.24362Latitude: EPAGrantFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: EPA - PASISpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: KevinShaddySupervisor: NotreportedProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 3Acres: EvaluationSiteTypeDetailed: EvaluationSiteType: 102300SiteCode: 08/02/2016StatusDate: No ActionRequiredStatus: 60002343FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4173 SANTA FEROADAddress: SAESPUREGASName: ENVIROSTOR: 57 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster F 0.011 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 149 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 4173 SANTA FE ROAD N/A F58 ENVIROSTORSAESPUREGAS S118584236 TC6926581.2s Page 184 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: NotreportedComments: 08/02/2016CompletedDate: PA/SI SiteScreeningCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: SAES PUREGAS (Continued)S118584236 NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: WADEBROWNOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: WADE BROWN - JEFF WOODINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZONLANEMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: SLOKENSBODY@GMAIL.COMContactEmail: 805-543-3746ContactFax: 805-543-5450ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7519ContactCity,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN STEDContactAddress: WADEBROWNContactName: CAL000322480EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7519HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN STEDHandlerAddress: WADE BROWN - JEFF WOOD INC DBA KENS BODYSHOPHandlerName: 20070720DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 84 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster G 0.016 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSW 4130 HORIZON LN STE D CAL000322480 G59 RCRA NonGen / NLRWADEBROWN - JEFF WOOD INC DBA KENS BODY SHOP 1024817731 TC6926581.2s Page 185 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805-543-5450Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7519Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN STEDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: WADEBROWNOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: WADE BROWN - JEFF WOOD INC DBA KENS BODY SHOP (Continued)1024817731 TC6926581.2s Page 186 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: WADE BROWN - JEFF WOOD INC DBA KENS BODYSHOPHandlerName: 20070720ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-748-1493Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LANE STEDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: WADE BROWN - JEFF WOODINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: WADE BROWN - JEFF WOOD INC DBA KENS BODY SHOP (Continued) 1024817731 Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438960CERSID: 41384SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #DAddress: KEN’S BODYSHOPName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 84 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster G 0.016 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSW CERS4130HORIZONLN #D N/A G60 CERS HAZWASTEKEN’S BODY SHOP S121778965 TC6926581.2s Page 187 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4130 HORIZON LANE #DAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JORDAN, RANDYEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KEN’S BODYSHOPEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4130 HORIZON LN #DAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-25-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10438960CERSID: 41384SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #DAddress: KEN’S BODYSHOPName: CERS: KEN’S BODY SHOP (Continued)S121778965 TC6926581.2s Page 188 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: KEN’S BODY SHOP (Continued)S121778965 120.66585Longitude: 35.24142Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011152RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0007203FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93405City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #BAddress: SAN LUIS AMBULANCESERVICEName: 120.66585Longitude: 35.24142Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0013971RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0761ProgramElementCode: FA0007203FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93405City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #BAddress: SAN LUIS AMBULANCESERVICEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 84 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster G 0.016 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405 SSW 4130 HORIZON LN #B N/A G61 CUPAListingsSANLUISAMBULANCESERVICE S110744113 120.66565Longitude: 35.24132Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011150RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0007202FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #DAddress: KEN’S BODYSHOPName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 84 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster G 0.016 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSW 4130 HORIZON LN #D N/A G62 CUPAListingsKEN’S BODY SHOP S110744112 TC6926581.2s Page 189 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66565Longitude: 35.24132Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011151RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0007202FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #DAddress: KEN’S BODYSHOPName: KEN’S BODY SHOP (Continued)S110744112 1994Year: 269 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055434757Telephone: TOM JEFFERIS, OWNERContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA943010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4130 HORIZON #CAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: HAZNET: 120.66611Longitude: 35.24155Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010301RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0006596FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #CAddress: BRUNDAGE-BONE CONCRETEPUMPINGName: 120.66611Longitude: 35.24155Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010300RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0006596FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4130 HORIZON LN #CAddress: BRUNDAGE-BONE CONCRETEPUMPINGName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 84 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster G 0.016 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 94301 SSW HAZNET4130HORIZON #C N/A G63 CUPAListingsJEFFERISAUTOBODY S113077203 TC6926581.2s Page 190 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: INACTIVE PER 1999 VQ-LHContactAddress: TOM JEFFERIS, OWNERContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 269 TANK FARMRDOwnerAddress: TOM JEFFERISOWNEROwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 269 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 07/14/1999LastActDate: 06/08/1994CreateDate: 06/30/1999InactiveDate: CAL000141109EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA943010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4130 HORIZON #CAddress: JEFFERIS AUTOBODYName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 96WasteQuantity: 0.048QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: ILD984908202Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: ILD984908202TransEPAID: 93117677ManifestID: 19940609ReceiptDate: 10/10/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19940608ShipmentDate: CAL000141109GenEPAID: 1994Year: Additional Info: 0.048Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL000141109Gepaid: JEFFERIS AUTO BODY (Continued)S113077203 TC6926581.2s Page 191 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: REGULARTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00007500TankCapacity: 1981YearInstalled: 2ContainerNum: 003TankNum: NoneLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: DIESELTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00007500TankCapacity: 1981YearInstalled: 1ContainerNum: 002TankNum: NoneLeakDetection: XContainerConstructionThickness: 2TypeofFuel: WASTETankUsedfor: 00007500TankCapacity: 1981YearInstalled: 3ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0003TotalTanks: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,St,Zip: 4115 SANTA FEROADOwnerAddress: SPYGLASS ASSOCIATES, INC. ANDOwnerName: 8055414676Telephone: H.B. EATON, IIIContactName: RESTAUURANTSOtherType: OtherFacilityType: 00000067721FacilityID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002BA87.pdfURL: 0002BA87FileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4115 SANTA FEROADAddress: SPYGLASSASSOCIATESName: HIST UST: 98 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster F 0.019 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 149 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 4115 SANTA FE ROAD N/A F64 HISTUSTSPYGLASSASSOCIATES U001585050 TC6926581.2s Page 192 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015004RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0008919FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4120 HORIZON LN #AAddress: CLOUD COMPANY, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 109 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster E 0.021 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 122 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSW 4120 HORIZON LN #A N/A E65 CUPAListingsCLOUDCOMPANY, INC S117845705 NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: ROBERTSILLEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: ROBERTSILLEROwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 4110 HORIZON LN # FMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: INKSPOTSLO@SBCGLOBAL.NETContactEmail: 000-000-0000ContactFax: 805-543-7991ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 4110 HORIZON LN # FContactAddress: ROBERTSILLERContactName: CAL000230189EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4110 HORIZON LN # FHandlerAddress: INKSPOTHandlerName: 20020124DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 170 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster E 0.032 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 122 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SW 4110 HORIZON LN # F CAL000230189 E66 RCRA NonGen / NLRINKSPOT 1024801427 TC6926581.2s Page 193 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: ROBERTSILLEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: INK SPOT (Continued)1024801427 TC6926581.2s Page 194 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: INFANTS’ CUT AND SEW APPARELMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 315291NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: INKSPOTHandlerName: 20020124ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-7991Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4110 HORIZON LN # FOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: ROBERTSILLEROwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-7991Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4110 HORIZON LN # FOwner/Operator Address: INK SPOT (Continued)1024801427 NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 208 ft. 0.039 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SW N/A 67 PFASWELL01 S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 195 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 196 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 53Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 210Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 197 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 198 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4Value: Qualifier: PFNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 199 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 200 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 201 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 202 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/19/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2.7Value: Qualifier: PFUNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000728-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000728GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000728GeoTrackerURL: 120.6645Longitude: 35.245722Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520837 TC6926581.2s Page 203 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 10/14/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 265 ft. 0.050 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 122 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SW N/A 68 PFASWELL01 S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 204 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 17Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 205 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 88Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 206 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 18Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 207 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 208 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 209 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 210 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000730-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000730GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000730GeoTrackerURL: 120.665699Longitude: 35.244334Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/20/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 TC6926581.2s Page 211 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 80 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access WELL 01 (Continued)S127520836 Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 895 AEROVISTA PLACE SUITE101AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DIANE KUKOL - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Entity Name: Regional BoardCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Cleanup ProgramSiteCERSDescription: T10000001206CERSID: 223326SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: PRADOROADAddress: FORMER MARTINELLIPROPERTYName: CERS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Documents. Unocal Tank Farm Rd Bulk Storage - San Luis Obispo Geotracker Site Deed Restriction for closure available to view under open GT Case:Site History: Crude Oil, Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)Potential Contaminants of Concern: than drinking water), Soil Aquifer used for drinking water supply, Other Groundwater (usesotherPotentialMediaAffected: RegionalBoardFileLocation: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: DKCaseWorker: Cleanup ProgramSiteCaseType: 120.664157971936Longitude: 35.251164627752Latitude: NotreportedLeadAgencyCaseNumber: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: T10000001206GlobalId: 08/23/2006StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedFacilityStatus: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: PRADOROADAddress: FORMER MARTINELLIPROPERTYName: CPS-SLIC: 269 ft. 0.051 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 126 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW CERSPRADOROAD N/A 69 CPS-SLICFORMERMARTINELLIPROPERTY S109604694 TC6926581.2s Page 212 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: GRANT ZOLDOWSKI, PEOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INCOwnerName: DENVER, CO80229MailingCity,State,Zip: 791 E. 64THAVEMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: GZOLDOWS@UR.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 303-286-4394ContactTelephone: DENVER, CO80229ContactCity,State,Zip: 791 EAST 64THAVENUEContactAddress: GRANT ZOLDOWSKI, PEContactName: CAL000209710EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC #560HandlerName: 20000303DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 324 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster H 0.061 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 168 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East 635 TANK FARM RD CAL000209710 H70 RCRA NonGen / NLRUNITEDRENTALSINC #560 1024799420 TC6926581.2s Page 213 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 303-286-4394Owner/Operator Telephone: DENVER, CO80229Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 791 EAST 64THAVENUEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: GRANT ZOLDOWSKI, PEOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 303-286-4394Owner/Operator Telephone: STAMFORD, CT 06902-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 100 FIRST STAMFORDPLACEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: UNITED RENTALS INC #560 (Continued)1024799420 TC6926581.2s Page 214 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: LEASING CONSTRUCTION, MINING, AND FORESTRY MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT RENTALANDNAICSDescription: 532412NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: UNITED RENTALS INC #560HandlerName: 20000303ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: UNITED RENTALS INC #560 (Continued) 1024799420 NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: NotreportedOwnerCountry: NotreportedOwnerZipCode: NotreportedOwnerState: NotreportedOwnerMailAddress: NotreportedOwnerPhone: NotreportedOperatorPhone: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedMailingAddressZipCode: NotreportedMailingAddressState: NotreportedMailingAddressCity: NotreportedMailingAddress: NotreportedFax: NotreportedPhone: NotreportedBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: NotreportedCERSID: 2000TotalGallons: UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST, INC.Owner: San LuisObispoCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,City/Zip: 635 TANKFARMAddress: NotreportedName: AST: 324 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster H 0.061 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 168 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA East 635 TANK FARM N/A H71 AST A100345280 TC6926581.2s Page 215 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: Continued)A100345280 99 --Owner City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: Owner Address: MADSENDONOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 635 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 08/19/1999LastActDate: 08/01/1990CreateDate: 01/01/1900InactiveDate: CAL000039541EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENTRENTALName: HWTS: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607900009GlobalID: NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENTRENTALName: CORTESE: 324 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster H 0.061 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 168 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East HWTS635TANKFARMRD N/A H72 CorteseZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL S124774403 TC6926581.2s Page 216 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 99 --City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: Contact Address: INACTIVE PER SURVEY NOV1994ContactName: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued) S124774403 03/22/1991Date: OtherActionType: T0607900009GlobalId: LeakReportedAction: 04/01/1991Date: OtherActionType: T0607900009GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 04/01/1991Date: OtherActionType: T0607900009GlobalId: LUST: 8057817560PhoneNumber: NotreportedEmail: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: NotreportedAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFOrganizationName: UST CASEWORKERContactName: Local AgencyCaseworkerContactType: T0607900009GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedSiteHistory: GasolinePotentialContaminantsofConcern: UnderInvestigationPotentialMediaAffect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: NotreportedFileLocation: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFLocalAgency: 1057RBCaseNumber: USTCaseWorker: 01/02/1992StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: 120.646412Longitude: 35.2463Latitude: T0607900009GlobalId: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607900009GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFLeadAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENTRENTALName: LUST: CERS HIST CORTESE 324 ft.CUPAListingsSite4of8inclusterH 0.061 mi.CERS TANKS Relative: Higher Actual: 168 ft. 1/8 CERS HAZWASTESANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 East AST635TANKFARMRD N/A H73 LUSTZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 217 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedMaxMTBESoil: NotreportedMaxMTBEGrndWtr: MTBE Class: NotreportedFunding: Interim Action: USTPilotProgram: Monitoring: NotreportedRemedialAction: NotreportedRemedialPlan: Pollution Char: NotreportedPrelimAssess: NotreportedWorkplan: NotreportedConfirmLeak: FJDStaffInitials: LocalAgencyLeadAgency: San Luis Obispo, San Luis ObispoCountyLocalAgency: BROADCrossStreet: NotreportedContact: NotreportedRPAddress: NotreportedResponsibleParty: NotreportedEnforcementType: 1/2/92CloseDate: NotreportedEnforceDate: 04/10/1991ReviewDate: 3/22/91StopDate: 04/10/1991EnterDate: 4/1/91DiscoveredDate: 04/01/1991ReleaseDate: OMHowDiscovered: NotreportedHowStopped: OverfillLeakCause: UNKLeakSource: UAbatementMethod: NotreportedQuantity: GasolineSubstance: UCaseType: NotreportedLocalCaseNum: 1057CaseNumber: CaseClosedStatus: T0607900009GlobalID: San LuisObispoFacilityCounty: Central CoastRegionRegionalBoard: 3Region: LUST REG 3: 01/02/1992StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607900009GlobalId: 03/22/1991StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607900009GlobalId: LUST: LeakStoppedAction: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued)S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 218 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: CERS HAZ WASTE: CAL000209710EPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 6902OwnerZipCode: CTOwnerState: 100 First Stamford Place, Suite700OwnerMailAddress: 303-286-4394OwnerPhone: 805-543-7297OperatorPhone: United Rentals Inc. 560OperatorName: 80229MailingAddressZipCode: COMailingAddressState: DenverMailingAddressCity: 791 East 64thAvenueMailingAddress: NotreportedFax: 805-5439-7297Phone: United Rentals (North America), Inc.Business Name: NotreportedFacilityID: 10437841CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: United Rentals, Inc.Owner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: AST: ALSO INVOLVED NO FURTHER ACTION. INVESTIGATION OF EXTENT IN PROGRESS. DIESEL IS GROUNDWATER WITHIN 2 FEET OF THE BOTTOM OF THE TANKS. Summary: NotreportedAssignedName: 0DistanceFromWell: NotreportedWellName: NotreportedWaterSystem: NotreportedOperator: NotreportedSuspended: NotreportedUSTCleanupFundID: 0Priority: NotreportedBeneficial: 10.24BasinPlan: NotreportedOrgName: 1MtbeFuel: 0MtbeConcentratn: NotreportedGrndWtrQualifier: NotreportedSoilQualifier: 35.2546089 / -120.6463162Lat/Long: NTMTBETested: Max MTBE Data: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued)S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 219 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: 120.64671Longitude: 35.24660Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002295RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0002295FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: 120.64671Longitude: 35.24660Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001768RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0002295FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: 120.64671Longitude: 35.24660Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006843RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002295FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Aboveground PetroleumStorageCERSDescription: 10437841CERSID: 405003SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: CERS TANKS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10437841CERSID: 405003SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued) S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 220 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation database will be completed be Annual electronic update of Hazardous Materials Business Plan viaCERSEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-08-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-08-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10437841CERSID: 405003SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: UNITED RENTALS INC. 560Name: CERS: 1057RegId: LTNKARegBy: 40FacilityCountyCode: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANKFARMedr_fadd1: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENTRENTALedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015635RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0009323FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 635 TANK FARMRDAddress: AT&T MOBILITY - UNITED RENTALS YARD (24369)Name: 120.64671Longitude: 35.24660Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008485RecordId: SLO CITY - AGT ANNUALPERMITProgramElement: 1251ProgramElementCode: FA0002295FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued) S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 221 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Annual facility inspection, no violations noted. Tanks andcontainersEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-17-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Employee training is done on comute HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 and submitted electronically.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-22-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Good employee training progra HMBP has been updated and submitted electronically via CERS Database.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-17-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-05-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: SPCC up to date and available on site.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-22-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: 2010 and again in 2015. SPCC for Above Ground Storage Tank Program has been re-certifiedinEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-04-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued) S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 222 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.646430Longitude: 35.246250Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10437841ProgramID: APSAEnvIntTypeCode: United Rentals Inc. 560FacilityName: 405003SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: submitted electronically. Good empl The Hazardous Materials Business Plan is complete and hasbeenEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-04-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-05-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: maintained in office. Spill Plan is being followed and checklist of inspectionsisEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-17-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: completed on-line using the CA E Will confirm if facility Hazardous Materials Business Plan hasbeenEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-17-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: properly labeled, spill contr ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued) S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 223 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 80229AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: COAffiliationState: DenverAffiliationCity: 791 East 64thAvenueAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ScottTooleEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: Mgr, EnvironmentalComplianceEntityTitle: ScottTooleEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 80229AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: COAffiliationState: DenverAffiliationCity: 791 East 64thAvenueAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: GRANTZOLDOWSKIEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Rentals (North America), Inc.Entity Name: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued)S102441500 TC6926581.2s Page 224 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 543-7297,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Rentals Branch560EntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 303) 286-4394,Affiliation Phone: 06902AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CTAffiliationState: StamfordAffiliationCity: 100 First Stamford Place, Suite700AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Rentals (North America), Inc.Entity Name: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: ZUPAN’S EQUIPMENT RENTAL (Continued) S102441500 HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 5-10 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0727ProgramElementCode: FA0002290FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: KARLESKINT-CRUM, INCName: 120.66641Longitude: 35.24389Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006838RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002290FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: KARLESKINT-CRUM, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10735426CERSID: 422382SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIRGENERALName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 371 ft.HWTSSite1of3inclusterI 0.070 mi.CERS Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SW CUPAListings225SUBURBANRD N/A I74 CERS HAZWASTESEAMAIRCONSTRUCTIONINC. DBA SEAMAIR GENERAL S113129369 TC6926581.2s Page 225 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2005Year: PO BOX3307MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055433311Telephone: CURTBOUTWELLContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: KCI ENVIRONMENTALINCName: HAZNET: 120.66937Longitude: 35.24399Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0018376RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0012857FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIRGENERALName: 120.66937Longitude: 35.24399Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0018375RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0012857FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIRGENERALName: 120.66641Longitude: 35.24389Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002290RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0002290FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: KARLESKINT-CRUM, INCName: 120.66641Longitude: 35.24389Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001761RecordId: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIR GENERAL (Continued)S113129369 TC6926581.2s Page 226 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoViolationsFound: 01-12-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: used oil and filter receipts on Items marked N/A not reviewed during inspection. Maintain copiesofEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-27-2021EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10735426CERSID: 422382SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIRGENERALName: CERS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NVD980895338TSDFAltEPAID: 21ST CENTRURYEMITransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PHILIP TRANSPORATION & REMEDIATIONINCTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 24732045ManifestID: 20060117ReceiptDate: 6/22/2006 18:32:46CreationDate: 20051228ShipmentDate: CAL000276897GenEPAID: 2005Year: Additional Info: 0.06255Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: NVD980895338TSDEPAID: CAL000276897Gepaid: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIR GENERAL (Continued) S113129369 TC6926581.2s Page 227 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: PresidentEntityTitle: Patrich GregPhelanEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CindyVenerisEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.669370Longitude: 35.243990Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10735426ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: Seamair Construction Inc. DBA SeamairGeneralFacilityName: 422382SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: changes to chemical inventory. HMBP to be updated for CY 2019 in the first quarter of this year. NoEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-29-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: noted. HMBP is current and a new plan to be updated for 2018. NoviolationsEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIR GENERAL (Continued) S113129369 TC6926581.2s Page 228 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAddress2: 225 SUBURBANRDAddress: KCI ENVIRONMENTALINCName: HWTS: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Seamair Construction Inc. DBA SeamairGeneralEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 439-4362,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Seamair Construction Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 439-4362,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: PO Box14613AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Patrick GregPhelanEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: PO Box14613AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CindyVenerisEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: PO Box14613AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIR GENERAL (Continued) S113129369 TC6926581.2s Page 229 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2014-08-22 09:07:40.120CreateDate: CAL000399955EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT2ContactAddress: BRYCERIVERAContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93403OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: PO BOX3126OwnerAddress: INDEPENDENT RACESHOPOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017503MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT2MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 09/09/2016LastActDate: 08/22/2014CreateDate: 06/30/2017InactiveDate: CAL000399955EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017503City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT2Address: INDEPENDENT RACE SHOPLLCName: 934010000FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 225 SUBURBANRDFacilityAddress: KCI ENVIRONMENTALINCFacilityName: 2007-11-29 00:00:00InactiveDate: 2003-12-09 09:45:49.77000IssuedEPAIDDate: RemediationServicesNAICSDescription: 56291NAICSCode: 2003-12-09 09:45:49.817CreateDate: CAL000276897EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934033307City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: PO BOX3307ContactAddress: CURTBOUTWELLContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 225 SUBURBANRDOwnerAddress: KCI ENVIRONMENTALINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934033307MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: PO BOX3307MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 12/03/2007LastActDate: 12/09/2003CreateDate: 11/29/2007InactiveDate: CAL000276897EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIR GENERAL (Continued)S113129369 TC6926581.2s Page 230 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934017503FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT2FacilityAddress: INDEPENDENT RACE SHOPLLCFacilityName: 2017-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 2014-08-22 09:07:40.10300IssuedEPAIDDate: All Other Motor Vehicle PartsManufacturingNAICSDescription: 336399NAICSCode: SEAMAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. DBA SEAMAIR GENERAL (Continued) S113129369 120.66662Longitude: 35.24387Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008106RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005404FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #2Address: INDEPENDENT RACESHOPName: 120.66662Longitude: 35.24387Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008105RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005404FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #2Address: INDEPENDENT RACESHOPName: 120.66662Longitude: 35.24387Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008107RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0005404FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #2Address: INDEPENDENT RACESHOPName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 371 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster I 0.070 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SW 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #2 N/A I75 CUPAListingsINDEPENDENTRACESHOP S110743843 TC6926581.2s Page 231 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017164RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0011810FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #2Address: INDEPENDENT RACESHOPName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017165RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0011810FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 225 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #2Address: INDEPENDENT RACESHOPName: INDEPENDENT RACE SHOP (Continued) S110743843 LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 426 ft. 0.081 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SW N/A 76 PFASWELL01 S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 232 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/18/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/18/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 233 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 234 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/18/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 47Value: Qualifier: PFOSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 235 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/4/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 47Value: Qualifier: PFOSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 236 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/4/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.9Value: Qualifier: PFOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 237 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/25/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 55Value: Qualifier: PFOSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 238 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/18/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000752GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 TC6926581.2s Page 239 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000752GeoTrackerURL: 120.666816Longitude: 35.242612Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 53Value: Qualifier: PFOSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000752-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520833 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019395RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0013916FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDAddress: ELITE COLLISIONREPAIRName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 444 ft. Site 1 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 251 TANK FARM RD N/A J77 CUPAListingsELITECOLLISIONREPAIR S123815444 TC6926581.2s Page 240 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2016Year: 0.1Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000368136TSDEPAID: CAL000365722Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.1Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000365722Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.40000Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000365722Gepaid: 2018Year: 0.45000Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000365722Gepaid: 2019Year: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8057850710Telephone: KATIEREEVESContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017593City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRName: HAZNET: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011902RecordId: UNIV WASTE GENERATOR (CESQUWG)Program Element: 1110ProgramElementCode: FA0007814FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARMRDAddress: APPLIANCECONTROLName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 444 ft. Site 2 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW HAZNET235TANKFARMRDUNITC N/A J78 CUPAListingsREEVESAUTOMOTIVEREPAIR S117845631 TC6926581.2s Page 241 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017265378JJKManifestID: 20170421ReceiptDate: 5/20/2018 18:31:05CreationDate: 20170418ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017877011JJKManifestID: 20170914ReceiptDate: 6/13/2018 18:30:34CreationDate: 20170912ShipmentDate: CAL000365722GenEPAID: 2017Year: Additional Info: 0.1Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000365722Gepaid: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued)S117845631 TC6926581.2s Page 242 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934017593FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCFacilityAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2011-07-18 09:24:02.21300IssuedEPAIDDate: General AutomotiveRepairNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: 2011-07-18 09:24:02.260CreateDate: CAL000365722EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCContactAddress: KATIEREEVESContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017593OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCOwnerAddress: JOHN REEVES & KATIEREEVESOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017593MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 10/13/2020LastActDate: 07/18/2011CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000365722EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017593City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued) S117845631 4KARALINASMAIL@GMAIL.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-878-4981ContactTelephone: ORCUTT, CA93455ContactCity,State,Zip: 952 DAVIDRDContactAddress: KARALINAPACHECOContactName: CAL000448802EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC FIX AUTO SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 20190913DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 444 ft. Site 3 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 251 TANK FARM RD CAL000448802 J79 RCRA NonGen / NLRELITECOLLISIONREPAIRINCFIXAUTOSANLUISOBISP 1025875667 TC6926581.2s Page 243 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: KARALINAPACHECOOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: KARALINAPACHECOOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC FIX AUTO SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued)1025875667 TC6926581.2s Page 244 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC FIX AUTO SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 20190913ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-878-4981Owner/Operator Telephone: ORCUTT, CA93455Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 952 DAVIDRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KARALINAPACHECOOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-878-4981Owner/Operator Telephone: ORCUTT, CA93455Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 952 DAVIDRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KARALINAPACHECOOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190927HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC FIX AUTO SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued) 1025875667 TC6926581.2s Page 245 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC FIX AUTO SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued) 1025875667 00009996TankCapacity: 1972YearInstalled: 562ContainerNum: 003TankNum: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: PREMIUMTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00000070TankCapacity: NotreportedYearInstalled: 564ContainerNum: 002TankNum: StockInventorLeakDetection: 10ContainerConstructionThickness: UNLEADEDTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00009996TankCapacity: 1971YearInstalled: 560ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0003TotalTanks: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406OwnerCity,St,Zip: P.O. BOX661OwnerAddress: UNION OIL COMPANY OFCALIFORNIOwnerName: 8055436338Telephone: BILLCOLEMANContactName: PETROLEUMTRANSPORTAOtherType: OtherFacilityType: 00000046656FacilityID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002BB24.pdfURL: 0002BB24FileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 267 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUISOBISPOName: HIST UST: 444 ft. Site 4 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 267 TANK FARM ROAD N/A J80 HISTUSTSANLUISOBISPO U001585028 TC6926581.2s Page 246 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: StockInventorLeakDetection: 10ContainerConstructionThickness: DIESELTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued)U001585028 Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: YesRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: LUISPACHECOOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: CLEONA JBAUTISTAOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMROADMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: 4LUISSMAIL@GMAIL.COMContactEmail: 800-838-2779ContactFax: 805-264-7858ContactTelephone: SANTA MARIA, CA93455ContactCity,State,Zip: 952 DAVIDROADContactAddress: LUISPACHECOContactName: CAL000444012EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMROADHandlerAddress: ELITE COLLISIONREPAIRHandlerName: 20190304DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 444 ft. Site 5 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 251 TANK FARM ROAD CAL000444012 J81 RCRA NonGen / NLRELITECOLLISIONREPAIR 1025870903 TC6926581.2s Page 247 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: LUISPACHECOOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-550-0674Owner/Operator Telephone: DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA92240Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 15300 PALM DR SPC237Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CLEONA JBAUTISTAOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190628HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR (Continued)1025870903 TC6926581.2s Page 248 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ELITE COLLISIONREPAIRHandlerName: 20190304ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-264-7858Owner/Operator Telephone: SANTA MARIA, CA93455Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 952 DAVIDROADOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR (Continued) 1025870903 NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: HECTOR.PAZ@FIXAUTOUSA.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-406-4741ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: HECTORPAZContactName: CAL000468549EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC DBA FIXAUTOHandlerName: 20220210DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 444 ft. Site 6 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 251 TANK FARM RD CAL000468549 J82 RCRA NonGen / NLRELITECOLLISIONREPAIRINCDBAFIXAUTO 1027094948 TC6926581.2s Page 249 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: HECTORPAZOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: THE PAZ GROUPINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC DBA FIX AUTO (Continued)1027094948 TC6926581.2s Page 250 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC DBA FIXAUTOHandlerName: 20220210ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-922-8700Owner/Operator Telephone: SANTA MARIA, CA93454Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 211 E MILLSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: THE PAZ GROUPINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-406-4741Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: HECTORPAZOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20220223HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC DBA FIX AUTO (Continued) 1027094948 TC6926581.2s Page 251 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: ELITE COLLISION REPAIR INC DBA FIX AUTO (Continued) 1027094948 PR0012500RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0008234FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 265 TANK FARMRDAddress: MAINO CONSTRUCTION COINCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: UNLEADEDTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00000500TankCapacity: 1978YearInstalled: 2ContainerNum: 002TankNum: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: REGULARTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00000500TankCapacity: 1974YearInstalled: 1ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0000TotalTanks: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406OwnerCity,St,Zip: 1122 LAURELLANEOwnerAddress: MAINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INOwnerName: 8055437411Telephone: JACKHUTCHINSContactName: CONSTRUCTIONYARDOtherType: OtherFacilityType: 00000052038FacilityID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002B91B.pdfURL: 0002B91BFileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN, CA93401City,State,Zip: 265 TANK FARMROADAddress: MAINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANYINName: HIST UST: 444 ft. Site 7 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUN, CA 93401 WSW CUPAListings265TANKFARMROAD N/A J83 HISTUSTMAINOCONSTRUCTIONCOMPANYIN U001585008 TC6926581.2s Page 252 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0012501RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0008234FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 265 TANK FARMRDAddress: MAINO CONSTRUCTION COINCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: MAINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN (Continued) U001585008 Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0018605RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0009283FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM #CAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRName: 120.66625Longitude: 35.24652Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015580RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0009283FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM #CAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439290CERSID: 61100SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM #CAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 444 ft. Site 8 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CUPAListings235TANKFARM #C N/A J84 CERS HAZWASTEREEVESAUTOMOTIVEREPAIR S112833445 TC6926581.2s Page 253 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEntityTitle: johnreevesEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: katiereevesEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-04-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-08-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10439290CERSID: 61100SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM #CAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRName: CERS: 120.66625Longitude: 35.24652Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015579RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0009283FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM #CAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRName: 120.66625Longitude: 35.24652Latitude: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued) S112833445 TC6926581.2s Page 254 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 785-0710,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 235 TANKFARMAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: REEVES, JOHNEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: ownerEntityTitle: katiereevesEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 235 TANK FARM #CAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIREntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 235 TANK FARM #CAffiliationAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued)S112833445 TC6926581.2s Page 255 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 785-0710,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: johnreevesEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued) S112833445 NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: YesRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: CHRISJAVINEOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: PO BOX954MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: CHRIS@SLA.MDContactEmail: 805-540-5758ContactFax: 805-543-2626ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: CHRISJAVINEContactName: CAL000351477EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCHandlerName: 20100406DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 444 ft. Site 9 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 261 TANK FARM RD CAL000351477 J85 RCRA NonGen / NLRSANLUISAMBULANCESERVICEINC 1025868128 TC6926581.2s Page 256 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-2626Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CHRISJAVINEOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190628HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICE INC (Continued)1025868128 TC6926581.2s Page 257 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NotreportedSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NotreportedSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NotreportedRecognizedTraderExporter: NotreportedRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCHandlerName: 20100406ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-2626Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX954Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICE INC (Continued) 1025868128 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015896RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0009516FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RD #GAddress: BOB HOLZERTOWINGName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 444 ft. Site 10 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 235 TANK FARM RD #G N/A J86 CUPAListingsBOBHOLZERTOWING S117845719 TC6926581.2s Page 258 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015895RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0009516FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RD #GAddress: BOB HOLZERTOWINGName: BOB HOLZER TOWING (Continued)S117845719 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001539RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0001539FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RDFAddress: ARNOLD & TODDINDUSTRIESName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006451RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0001539FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RDFAddress: ARNOLD & TODDINDUSTRIESName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 444 ft. Site 11 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 235 TANK FARM RD F N/A J87 CUPAListingsARNOLD & TODD INDUSTRIES S117845006 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCHandlerAddress: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRHandlerName: 20110718DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 444 ft. Site 12 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 235 TANK FARM RD UNIT C CAL000365722 J88 RCRA NonGen / NLRREEVESAUTOMOTIVEREPAIR 1024830569 TC6926581.2s Page 259 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: KATIEREEVESOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: JOHN REEVES & KATIEREEVESOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7593MailingCity,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: REEVESAUTOREPAIR@YAHOO.COMContactEmail: 805-785-0702ContactFax: 805-785-0710ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCContactAddress: KATIEREEVESContactName: CAL000365722EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7593HandlerCity,State,Zip: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued)1024830569 TC6926581.2s Page 260 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: REEVES AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRHandlerName: 20110718ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-785-0710Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KATIEREEVESOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-785-0710Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7593Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 235 TANK FARM RD UNITCOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JOHN REEVES & KATIEREEVESOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued)1024830569 TC6926581.2s Page 261 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (Continued) 1024830569 NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PROGRESSIVE AUTOARTEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.665580Longitude: 35.246770Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10439512ProgramID: HWGEnvIntTypeCode: PROGRESSIVE AUTOARTFacilityName: 145144SiteID: Coordinates: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439512CERSID: 145144SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDAddress: PROGRESSIVE AUTOARTName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 444 ft. Site 13 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CUPAListings251TANKFARMRD N/A J89 CERS HAZWASTEPROGRESSIVEAUTOART S103982811 TC6926581.2s Page 262 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0012502RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0008047FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 251 TANK FARMRDAddress: PROGRESSIVE AUTOARTName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 251 TANK FARMRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART (Continued) S103982811 Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015582RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0009284FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUISAMBULANCEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439293CERSID: 64667SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUISAMBULANCEName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 444 ft.HWTSSite14of19inclusterJ 0.084 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CUPAListings261TANKFARMRD N/A J90 CERS HAZWASTESANLUISAMBULANCE S112833446 TC6926581.2s Page 263 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.2Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAD097030993TSDEPAID: CAL000351477Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.13750Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: AZR000521146TSDEPAID: CAL000351477Gepaid: 2019Year: PO BOX954MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055432626Telephone: CHRISJAVINEContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934060000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 261 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCName: HAZNET: 120.66556Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015581RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0009284FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUISAMBULANCEName: 120.66556Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0018926RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0009284FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUISAMBULANCEName: 120.66556Longitude: 35.24678Latitude: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE (Continued) S112833446 TC6926581.2s Page 264 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: levels above the regulatory limit Facilityy has recently increased storage of hazardous materialstoEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-28-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via the web based applicati A Hazardous Materials Business Plan needs to besubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-07-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10439293CERSID: 64667SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 261 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUISAMBULANCEName: CERS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 0.2QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGY VERNONINCTransName: CAD097030993TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ASBURY ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD028277036TransEPAID: 016874614JJKManifestID: 20170630ReceiptDate: 5/19/2018 18:30:13CreationDate: 20170626ShipmentDate: CAL000351477GenEPAID: 2017Year: Additional Info: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE (Continued) S112833446 TC6926581.2s Page 265 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FrankKeltonEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-2626,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 261 TANKFARMAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KELTON, FRANKEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ChrisJavineEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: San LuisAmbulanceEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.664860Longitude: 35.246780Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10439293ProgramID: HWGEnvIntTypeCode: SAN LUISAMBULANCEFacilityName: 64667SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Facility has completed a HMBP electroniclally for CY 2019.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-24-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE (Continued) S112833446 TC6926581.2s Page 266 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedMailingAddress2: PO BOX954MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 07/21/2020LastActDate: 04/06/2010CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000351477EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 261 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCName: HWTS: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: GeneralMangerEntityTitle: ChrisJavineEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 261 TANK FARMRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: P.O Box954AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ChrisJavineEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-2626,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE (Continued)S112833446 TC6926581.2s Page 267 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 261 TANK FARMRDFacilityAddress: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2010-04-06 11:08:15.59700IssuedEPAIDDate: General AutomotiveRepairNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: 2010-04-06 11:08:15.610CreateDate: CAL000351477EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: P.O BOX954ContactAddress2: 261 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: CHRISJAVINEContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934060000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: PO BOX954OwnerAddress: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICEINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934060000MailingCity,State,Zip: SAN LUIS AMBULANCE (Continued) S112833446 OtherOwnerType: RICHARDMCINTURFFOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITHMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: SLOPERFORMANCEMARINE@GMAIL.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-366-3066ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITHContactAddress: ALEXMCINTURFFContactName: CAL000420502EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITHHandlerAddress: SLO PERFORMANCEMARINEHandlerName: 20160930DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 445 ft. Site 15 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 245 TANK FARM RD UNIT H CAL000420502 J91 RCRA NonGen / NLRSLOPERFORMANCEMARINE 1025870086 TC6926581.2s Page 268 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190628HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: YesRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: ALEXMCINTURFFOperatorName: SLO PERFORMANCE MARINE (Continued)1025870086 TC6926581.2s Page 269 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NotreportedSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NotreportedSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NotreportedRecognizedTraderExporter: NotreportedRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SLO PERFORMANCEMARINEHandlerName: 20160930ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-366-3066Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITHOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: ALEXMCINTURFFOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-366-3066Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITHOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: RICHARDMCINTURFFOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: SLO PERFORMANCE MARINE (Continued) 1025870086 TC6926581.2s Page 270 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: ERIKLEGREIDOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: TANK FARM RD UNITKMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-543-9463ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITKContactAddress: ERIKLEGREIDContactName: CA0000240044EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITKHandlerAddress: ACCESSORYPRODUCTIONSHandlerName: 19940416DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 445 ft. Site 16 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 ECHOSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW FINDS245TANKFARMRDUNITK CA0000240044 J92 RCRA-SQGACCESSORYPRODUCTIONS 1000904999 TC6926581.2s Page 271 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ACCESSORYPRODUCTIONSHandlerName: 19940416ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-9463Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITKOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ERIKLEGREIDOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20000915HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: ACCESSORY PRODUCTIONS (Continued)1000904999 TC6926581.2s Page 272 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD UNITKAddress: ACCESSORYPRODUCTIONSName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002616045DFRURL: 110002616045RegistryID: 1000904999Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002616045RegistryID: FINDS: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: No NAICS CodesFoundNAICSCodes: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: ACCESSORY PRODUCTIONS (Continued) 1000904999 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0016564RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0010671FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD STEMAddress: WEBB’S MOBILE SERVICE & GARAGEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 445 ft. Site 17 of 19 in cluster J 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 245 TANK FARM RD H N/A J93 CUPAListingsPERFORMANCEMARINE S117039734 TC6926581.2s Page 273 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017409RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0012017FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RDHAddress: PERFORMANCEMARINEName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0016563RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0010671FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM RD STEMAddress: WEBB’S MOBILE SERVICE & GARAGEName: PERFORMANCE MARINE (Continued) S117039734 NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: MANAGER, CHEMISTRY EH&SContactTitle: JAIME.DWIGHT@PROMEGA.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-592-2621ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: GRANADADRIVEContactAddress: JAIMEDWIGHTContactName: CAD982501983EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRHandlerAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20210809DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-LQG: CERS CIWQS WDS NPDES EMI CUPA Listings ECHO 498 ft.FINDSSite1of4inclusterK 0.094 mi.TRIS Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8 CERS HAZWASTESANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW CPS-SLIC277GRANADADR 93401JBLSC277GR K94 RCRA-LQGPROMEGABIOSCIENCESLLC 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 274 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20210812HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: GRANADADRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 275 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MERCURYWasteDescription: D009WasteCode: CHROMIUMWasteDescription: D007WasteCode: REACTIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D003WasteCode: CORROSIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D002WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2001Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2003Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2005Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2007Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2009Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2011Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2013Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2015Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2017Year: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2019Year: Biennial: List of Years NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 276 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation P075WasteCode: HYDRAZINE, METHYL- (OR) METHYLHYDRAZINEWasteDescription: P068WasteCode: COPPER CYANIDE (OR) COPPER CYANIDE CU(CN)Waste Description: P029WasteCode: BENZENETHIOL (OR) THIOPHENOLWasteDescription: P014WasteCode: LABPACKWasteDescription: LABPWasteCode: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYLETHYLWasteDescription: F005WasteCode: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWasteDescription: F003WasteCode: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F004, AND USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2, CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste Description: F002WasteCode: TRICHLORETHYLENEWasteDescription: D040WasteCode: PYRIDINEWasteDescription: D038WasteCode: O-CRESOLWasteDescription: D023WasteCode: CHLOROFORMWasteDescription: D022WasteCode: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 277 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: FURAN, TETRAHYDRO-(I) (OR) TETRAHYDROFURAN (I)Waste Description: U213WasteCode: PHENOLWasteDescription: U188WasteCode: 1-NAPTHALENAMINE (OR) ALPHA-NAPHTHYLAMINEWasteDescription: U167WasteCode: NAPHTHALENEWasteDescription: U165WasteCode: 1,4-DIETHYLENEOXIDE (OR) 1,4-DIOXANEWasteDescription: U108WasteCode: DIMETHYLAMINE (I) (OR) METHANAMINE, N-METHYL- (I)Waste Description: U092WasteCode: METHANE, DICHLORO- (OR) METHYLENECHLORIDEWasteDescription: U080WasteCode: BENZENE, 1,2-DICHLORO- (OR) O-DICHLOROBENZENEWasteDescription: U070WasteCode: CRESOL (CRESYLIC ACID) (OR) PHENOL, METHYL-Waste Description: U052WasteCode: ANILINE (I,T) (OR) BENZENAMINE (I,T)Waste Description: U012WasteCode: ACETOPHENONE (OR) ETHANONE, 1-PHENYL-Waste Description: U004WasteCode: ACETONITRILE (I,T)Waste Description: U003WasteCode: ACETALDEHYDE (I) (OR) ETHANAL (I)Waste Description: U001WasteCode: SODIUM CYANIDE (OR) SODIUM CYANIDE NA(CN)Waste Description: P106WasteCode: POTASSIUM CYANIDE (OR) POTASSIUM CYANIDE K(CN)Waste Description: P098WasteCode: SALTS NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, &Waste Description: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 278 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: JAIME.DWIGHT@PROMEGA.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: JAIME.DWIGHT@PROMEGA.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: JAIME.DWIGHT@PROMEGA.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: JAIME.DWIGHT@PROMEGA.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 279 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 280 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 608-274-4330Owner/Operator Telephone: MADISON, WI 53711-5399Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2800 WOODS HOLLOWRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: JAIME.DWIGHT@PROMEGA.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 281 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: JAIME.DWIGHT@PROMEGA.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8524Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19990510DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 282 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: JBLSCIENTIFICHandlerName: 19940415ReceiveDate: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20210809ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCHandlerName: 19990623ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20030715DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 283 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Handler Name: 20040130ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCHandlerName: 20020227ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: JBL SCIENTIFIC, INC.Handler Name: 19990304ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: JBL SCIENTIFIC, INC.Handler Name: 19960223ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 284 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20120215ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20100210ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Handler Name: 20080211ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.Handler Name: 20060126ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 285 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCHandlerName: 19960901ReceiveDate: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20200228ReceiveDate: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20180227ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20160229ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCHandlerName: 20140301ReceiveDate: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 286 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFinalAmount: NotreportedFinalCount: NotreportedPaidAmount: NotreportedFinalMonetaryAmount: NotreportedProposedAmount: NotreportedSEPTypeDescription: NotreportedSEPType: NotreportedSEPDefaultedDate: NotreportedSEPActualDate: NotreportedSEPScheduledCompletionDate: NotreportedSEPExpenditureAmount: NotreportedSEPSequenceNumber: NotreportedEnforcementResponsibleSub-Organization: NotreportedEnforcementResponsiblePerson: NotreportedEnforcementType: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Lead Agency: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Respondent Name: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Sequence Number: NotreportedDispositionStatusDescription: NotreportedDispositionStatus: NotreportedDispositionStatusDate: NotreportedAppealResolutionDate: NotreportedAppealInitiatedDate: NoCorrectiveActionComponent: NotreportedEnforcementAttorney: NotreportedEnforcementDocketNumber: EPAEnforcementResponsibleAgency: 20050601DateofEnforcementAction: 001EnforcementIdentifier: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: EPAViolationResponsibleAgency: DocumentedReturntoComplianceQualifier: 20050908ActualReturntoComplianceDate: 20050323DateViolationwasDetermined: Generators - GeneralViolationShortDescription: EPAAgencyWhichDeterminedViolation: YesFoundViolation: Facility Has Received Notices of Violation: IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTANCEMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 325413NAICSCode: PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 325412NAICSCode: MEDICINAL AND BOTANICALMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 325411NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 287 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEvaluationResponsiblePersonIdentifier: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluationTypeDescription: NoFoundViolation: StateEvaluationResponsibleAgency: 20050622EvaluationDate: NotreportedFormerCitation: NotreportedRequestAgency: NotreportedDateResponseReceived: NotreportedDateofRequest: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: 20050908ActualReturntoComplianceDate: NotreportedEvaluationResponsibleSub-Organization: DFERNEvaluationResponsiblePersonIdentifier: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluationTypeDescription: YesFoundViolation: EPAEvaluationResponsibleAgency: 20050323EvaluationDate: Evaluation Action Summary: NotreportedFinalAmount: NotreportedFinalCount: NotreportedPaidAmount: NotreportedFinalMonetaryAmount: NotreportedProposedAmount: NotreportedSEPTypeDescription: NotreportedSEPType: NotreportedSEPDefaultedDate: NotreportedSEPActualDate: NotreportedSEPScheduledCompletionDate: NotreportedSEPExpenditureAmount: NotreportedSEPSequenceNumber: NotreportedEnforcementResponsibleSub-Organization: NotreportedEnforcementResponsiblePerson: NotreportedEnforcementType: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Lead Agency: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Respondent Name: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Sequence Number: NotreportedDispositionStatusDescription: NotreportedDispositionStatus: NotreportedDispositionStatusDate: NotreportedAppealResolutionDate: NotreportedAppealInitiatedDate: NotreportedCorrectiveActionComponent: NotreportedEnforcementAttorney: NotreportedEnforcementDocketNumber: NotreportedEnforcementResponsibleAgency: NotreportedDateofEnforcementAction: NotreportedEnforcementIdentifier: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: NotreportedViolationResponsibleAgency: NotreportedReturntoComplianceQualifier: NotreportedActualReturntoComplianceDate: NotreportedDateViolationwasDetermined: NotreportedViolationShortDescription: NotreportedAgencyWhichDeterminedViolation: NoFoundViolation: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 288 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Aquifer used for drinking watersupplyPotentialMediaAffected: State RecordsCenterFileLocation: S225RBCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseWorker: Cleanup ProgramSiteCaseType: 120.667805Longitude: 35.251298Latitude: NotreportedLeadAgencyCaseNumber: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SLT3S1561326GlobalId: 11/30/2001StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedFacilityStatus: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFICFACILITYName: CPS-SLIC: NotreportedPCA: NoCaseTypeOtherGrndWtr: YesCaseTypeDrinkingWaterAqfr: NoCaseTypeDrinkinWaterWell: NoCaseTypeSurfaceWater: NoCaseTypeSoilImpacted: NoCaseTypeUndetermined: Drinking Water AquiferaffectedCaseType: CaseClosedFacilityStatus: SLICProgramType: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedDateFirstReported: BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NJ7922RPCity,St,Zip: 2 OAKWAYRPAddress: NotreportedRPNumber: NotreportedRPPhone: NotreportedRPContact: MR. ROBERTKLEMResponsibleParty: GENETA, INC.RB Case In: GOVDiscovered: NotreportedEnteredIntoDatabase: S225RegionalBoardCase#: NotreportedLeakSiteCrossStreet: 3Region: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFICFACILITYName: SLIC REG 3: NotreportedFormerCitation: NotreportedRequestAgency: NotreportedDateResponseReceived: NotreportedDateofRequest: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: NotreportedActualReturntoComplianceDate: NotreportedEvaluationResponsibleSub-Organization: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 289 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedNaicscode3: NotreportedNaicscode2: 325413Primarynaicscode: NotreportedNaicsorigin: NotreportedSiccode6: NotreportedSiccode5: NotreportedSiccode4: NotreportedSiccode3: NotreportedSiccode2: NotreportedPrimarysiccode: KRISTEN.YETTER@PROMEGA.COMPubliccontactemail: 8055922612PubliccontactphoneandExt: KRISTENYETTERPubliccontactname: NOAssignedfedfacilityflag: NOGocofacilityind: NOFederalfacilityind: NOPartialfacilityind: YESEntirefacilityind: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingprovince: 277 GRANADADRMailingstreet: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCMailingname: NotreportedTribename: NotreportedBIAcode: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCName: 2019-06-27Datesigned: ELECTRONICCertifyingofficialssignatureindicator: ANDREWBURLEYTitleofcertifyingofficial: NOSanitizedindicator: NOTradesecretindicator: 2018Reportingyear: FormRFormType: 93401JBLSC277GRTRIID: Facility, Chemical, Releases and Other Waste Management Summary Information: RCRA LQ HWGeneratorCERSDescription: 10437187CERSID: 59000SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10437187CERSID: 59000SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: NotreportedSiteHistory: Other ChlorinatedHydrocarbonsPotentialContaminantsofConcern: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 290 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDischargestostreamd - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamc - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamc - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamc: NotreportedDischargestostreamc - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamb - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamb - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamb: NotreportedDischargestostreamb - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreama - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreama - basis of estimate: 0Totaldischargestostreama: NADischargestostreama - stream name: 1545Totalairemissions: OtherStackairemissions - basis of estimate: 1545Totalstackairemissions: NotreportedStackairemissions - release range code: 1545Stackairemissions - release pounds: Periodic/Random MonotoningDataFugitiveairemissions - basis of estimate: 0Totalfugitiveairemissions: NotreportedFugitiveairemissions - total release range code: 0Fugitiveairemissions - total release pounds: 03Maximumamountonsite: NotreportedRevisioncode2: NotreportedRevisioncode1: NOMetalind: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: DICHLOROMETHANEChemicalname: 000075092Casnumber: 93401JBLSC277GRTRIID: 1318217280938Documentcontrolnumber: PROMEGACORPStandardizedparentcompanyname: 089855696ParentcompanyDandBnumber: PROMEGACORPParentcompanyname: NotreportedNPDESnumberG: NotreportedNPDESnumberF: NotreportedNPDESnumberE: NotreportedNPDESnumberD: NotreportedNPDESnumberC: NotreportedNPDESnumberB: CAZ332584NPDESnumberA: NotreportedRCRAnumberH: NotreportedRCRAnumberG: NotreportedRCRAnumberF: NotreportedRCRAnumberE: NotreportedRCRAnumberD: NotreportedRCRAnumberC: NotreportedRCRAnumberB: CAD982501983RCRAnumberA: NotreportedDandBnumberB: NotreportedDandBnumberA: 120.66619Longitude: 35.25113Latitude: NotreportedNaicscode6: NotreportedNaicscode5: NotreportedNaicscode4: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 291 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Off-site - RCRA subtitle c landfills: 0Off-site - other landfills: 0Off-site - other surface impoundments: 0Off-site - RCRA subtitle c surface impoundments: 0Off-site - surface impoundment: 0Off-site - landfills/disposal surface impoundments: 0Off-site - underground injection - class ii-v wells: 0Off-site - underground injection - class 1 wells: 0Off-site - underground injection: 0Off-site - wastewater treatment - metals: 0Off-site - solid/stab - release - metals: 0Off-site - wastewater treatment release - metals: 0Off-site - solid/stab - metals: 0Off-site - storage only: 0Off-site - POTW releases: 1545Totalon-site releases: 0Totalon-site land releases: NotreportedOtherdisposal - basis of estimate: 0Totalotherdisposal: NotreportedOthersurfaceimpoundment - basis of estimate: 0Totalothersurfaceimpoundments: NotreportedRCRAcSurfaceimpoundment - basis of estimate: 0TotalRCRAcsurfaceimpoundments: NotreportedSurfaceimpoundment - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotalsurfaceimpoundments: NotreportedLandtrtmt/appl farming - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site land treatment: NotreportedOtherlandfills - basis of estimate: 0Totalotheron-site landfills: NotreportedOn-site RCRA subtitle c landfills - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site RCRA subtitle c landfills: NotreportedOn-site landfills - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotalon-site landfills: 0Totalon-site underground injection: NotreportedOn-site ungrnd inj to cl ii-v wells - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site ugrnd inj to cl ii-v wells - pounds: NotreportedOn-site underground inj to c1 i wells - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site ugrnd inj to cl i wells - pounds: NotreportedOn-site underground inj - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotalon-site underground inj - pounds: 0Totalsurfacewaterdischarge: 0Totalnumberofreceivingstreams: NotreportedDischargestostreamg - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamg - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamg: NotreportedDischargestostreamg - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamf - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamf - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamf: NotreportedDischargestostreamf - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreame - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreame - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreame: NotreportedDischargestostreame - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamd - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamd - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamd: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 292 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSaleordistributionofthechemical: NoOn-site use of the chemical: NoImportthechemical: NoProducethechemical: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: DICHLOROMETHANEChemicalname: 1318217280938Documentcontrolnumber: 000075092Casnumber: Chemical Activities and Uses: 0OffSite - POTW Releases 81D: 0OffSite - POTW Releases 81C: NotreportedWasteRockQuantity: 0WasteRockPilemanagedIndicator: NOElementalMetalIncluded: 110000481746FRSFacilityID: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 7: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 6: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 5: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 4: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 3: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 2: NotApplicableOn-site recycling processes method 1: NotreportedOn-site energy recovery method 4: NotApplicableOn-site energy recovery method 3: NotreportedOn-site energy recovery method 2: NotApplicableOn-site energy recovery method 1: 0Totalon-site waste management: 0Treatedonsitecurrentyear: 0Recycledonsitecurrentyear: 0Energyrecoveryonsitecurrentyear: 0TotalPOTWtransfer: 13976Totaltransferredoffsiteforfurtherwastemanagement: 0Off-site - transfer to waste broker: 0Totaltransferredoffsitefortreatment: 0Off-site - transfer to waste broker - waste treatment: 0Off-site - other waste treatment: 0Off-site - wastewater treatment - non-metals: 0Off-site - incineration/insignificant heat value: 0Off-site -incineration/thermal treatment: 0Off-site - solid/stab treatment - non metals: 0Off-site - POTW treatment: 0Totaltransferredoffsiteforenergyrecovery: 0Off-site - transfer to waste broker for energy recovery: 0Off-site - energy recovery: 13976Totaltransferredoffsiteforrecycling: 0Off-site - recycling - transfer to waste broker: 0Off-site - recycling - acid regeneration: 13976Off-site - recycling - other reuse or recovery: 0Off-site - recycling -metals recovery: 0Off-site - recycling - solvents/organics recovery: 0Totaltransferredoffsitefordisposal: 0Off-site - disposal - unknown: 0Off-site - disposal - transfer to waste broker: 0Off-site - disposal - other off-site management: 0Off-site - disposal - other land disposal: 0Off-site - disposal - land treatment: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 293 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401SubmittedZipCode: CASubmittedState: SAN LUISOBISPOSubmittedCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOSubmittedCity: 277 GRANADADRSubmittedStreet: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCSubmittedFacilityName: NoZ399other: NoZ308constructionmaterials: NoZ307watertreatment: NoZ306wastetreatment: NoZ305flameretardant: NoZ304fuel: NoZ303lubricant: NoZ302degreaser: NoZ301cleaner: NoAncillaryorotheruse: NoZ299other: NoZ205hydraulicfluids: NoZ204refrigerants: NoZ203coolants: NoZ202metalworkingfluids: NoZ201processlubricants: NoUsedasamanufacturingaid: NoZ199other: NoZ106solutionbuffers: NoZ105reactionterminators: NoZ104initiators: NoZ103inhibitors: NoZ102catalysts: NoZ101processsolvents: YesUsedasachemicalprocessingaid: NoProcessed / recycling: NoAsaprocessimpurity: NoRepackaging: NoUsedasanarticlecomponent: NoP299other: NoP211rheologicalmodifiers: NoP210flameretardants: NoP209lubricants: NoP208surfactants: NoP207emulsifiers: NoP206inhibitors: NoP205solvents: NoP204initiators: NoP203reactiondiluents: NoP202dyes: NoP201additives: NoAddedasaformulationcomponent: NoP199other: NoP104initiators: NoP103intermediates: NoP102rawmaterials: NoP101feedstocks: NoUsedasareactant: NoAsamanufacturedimpurity: NoAsabyproduct: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 294 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Quantitytreatedonsite2nd-following year: 0Quantitytreatedonsitefollowingyear: 0Quantitytreatedonsitecurrentyear: 0Quantitytreatedonsiteprioryear: 13976Quantityrecycledoffsite2nd-following year: 13976Quantityrecycledoffsitefollowingyear: 13976Quantityrecycledoffsitecurrentyear: 15170Quantityrecycledoffsiteprioryear: 0Quantityrecycledonsite2nd-following year: 0Quantityrecycledonsitefollowingyear: 0Quantityrecycledonsitecurrentyear: 0Quantityrecycledonsiteprioryear: 0Energyrecoveryoffsite2nd-following year: 0Energyrecoveryoffsitefollowingyear: 0Energyrecoveryoffsitecurrentyear: 0Energyrecoveryoffsiteprioryear: 0Energyrecoveryonsite2nd-following year: 0Energyrecoveryonsitefollowingyear: 0Energyrecoveryonsitecurrentyear: 0Energyrecoveryonsiteprioryear: 0Otheroff-site releases - 2nd-following year: 0Otheroff-site releases - following year: 0Otheroff-site releases - current year: 0Otheroff-site releases - previous year: 0Off-site limited releases - 2nd-following year: 0Off-site limited releases - following year: 0Off-site limited releases - current year: 0Off-site limited releases - prior year: 1545Otheron-site releases - 2nd-following year: 1545Otheron-site releases - following year: 1545Otheron-site releases - current year: 1657.7Otheron-site releases - prior year: 0On-site limited releases - 2nd-following year: 0On-site limited releases - following year: 0On-site limited releases - current year: 0On-site limited releases - prior year: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: DICHLOROMETHANEChemicalname: 1318217280938Documentcontrolnumber: 000075092Casnumber: Detailed Source Reduction Activities and Methods: 6220200808Totalnumberofformssubmitted: 2Numberofformssubmitted: 1988Firstyearthefacilityreported: 2019Lastyearthefacilityreported: ChemicalsIndustryName: 325IndustryCode: ChemicalsSubmittedIndustryName: 325SubmittedIndustryCode: 325413SubmittedPrimaryNAICSCode: PROMEGACORPSubmittedStandardizedParentCompanyName: 089855696SubmittedParentCompanyDBNumber: PROMEGACORPSubmittedParentCompanyName: NotreportedSubmittedTribeName: NotreportedSubmittedBIACode: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 295 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream3 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream2 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream2 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream1 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NAStream1 - waste stream code: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: DICHLOROMETHANEChemicalname: 1318217280938Documentcontrolnumber: 000075092Casnumber: Detailed On-site Waste Treatment Methods and Efficiency: NotreportedESTAnnREDN4thsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported4thSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported4thSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: Notreported4thSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: Notreported4thSRactivitycodeanddesc: NotreportedESTAnnREDN3rdsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported3rdSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported3rdSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: Notreported3rdSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: Notreported3rdSRactivitycodeanddesc: NotreportedESTAnnREDN2ndsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported2ndSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported2ndSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: Notreported2ndSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: Notreported2ndSRactivitycodeanddesc: NotreportedESTAnnREDN1stsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported1stSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported1stSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: Notreported1stSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: NA-NA1stSRreductionactivity: PRODUCTIONProdratiooractivity: 1Prodratio/activity index: NotreportedCatastrophicreleasesorotherone-time events: 0Quantitytreatedoffsite2nd-following year: 0Quantitytreatedoffsitefollowingyear: 0Quantitytreatedoffsitecurrentyear: 004Quantitytreatedoffsiteprioryear: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 296 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TRIClassification: DICHLOROMETHANEChemicalname: 1318217280938Documentcontrolnumber: 000075092Casnumber: Details of Transfers to Publicly Owned Treatment Works: NotreportedFRSID - Transfer Location: 0Totalamounttransferredoffsitefortreatment: 0Totalamounttransferredoffsiteforenergyrecovery: 13976Totalamounttransferredoffsiteforrecycling: OtherOffsiteotherreuseorrecoverym26BOE: 13976Offsiteotherreuseorrecoverym26LBS: 0Totalamounttransferredoffsitefordisposal: PoundsUnitofmeasure: NOOffsitecontrol: NotreportedOffsitecountryid: NotreportedOffsiteprovince: LOSANGELESOffsitecounty: AZUSA, CA91702OffsiteCity,State,Zip: 1704 W. FIRSTSTREETOffsitestreetaddress: VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLCOffsitename: 2Offsitetransfersequencenumber: CAD008302903OffsiteRCRAidnr: TRIClassification: DICHLOROMETHANEChemicalname: 1318217280938Documentcontrolnumber: 000075092Casnumber: Details of Off-site Transfers: NotreportedStream5 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream5 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream4 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream4 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream3 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 3: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 297 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDischargestostreamb - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreama - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreama - basis of estimate: 0Totaldischargestostreama: NADischargestostreama - stream name: 391.2Totalairemissions: OtherStackairemissions - basis of estimate: 391.2Totalstackairemissions: NotreportedStackairemissions - release range code: 391.2Stackairemissions - release pounds: Periodic/Random MonotoningDataFugitiveairemissions - basis of estimate: 0Totalfugitiveairemissions: NotreportedFugitiveairemissions - total release range code: 0Fugitiveairemissions - total release pounds: 03Maximumamountonsite: NotreportedRevisioncode2: NotreportedRevisioncode1: NOMetalind: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: METHANOLChemicalname: 000067561Casnumber: 93401JBLSC277GRTRIID: NotreportedExperimentalandEst. Treatment - Basis of Est.: 0ExperimentalandEst. Treatment: 0OffSite - POTW Releases: 0OffSite - POTW Releases 81D: 0OffSite - POTW Releases 81C: NotreportedPOTWRegistryID: 0Totaltreated: NotreportedSludgetoincineration - nonmetals - basis of estimate: 0Sludgetoincineration - nonmetals: Periodic/Random MonotoningDataOtherorunknowntreatment - basis of estimate: 0Otherorunknowntreatment: NotreportedOtherorunknowndisposal - basis of estimate: 0Otherorunknowndisposal: NotreportedSludgetoagriculturalapplications - basis of estimate: 0Sludgetoagriculturalapplications: NotreportedSludgetoincineration - metals - basis of estimate: 0Sludgetoincineration - metals: NotreportedSludgetodisposal - basis of estimate: 0Sludgetodisposal: NotreportedReleasedtoair - basis of estimate: 0Releasedtoair: NotreportedDischargestootheractivities - basis of estimate: 0Dischargestootheractivities: NotreportedDischargestowaterstreams - basis of estimate: 0Dischargestowaterstreams: NotreportedBasisofestimate: 0Quantitytransferred: SAN LUISOBISPOPOTWcounty: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401POTWCity,State,Zip: 35 PRADORDPOTWaddress: SAN LUIS OBISPOWWTPPOTWname: PoundsUnitofmeasure: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 298 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Off-site - underground injection: 0Off-site - wastewater treatment - metals: 0Off-site - solid/stab - release - metals: 0Off-site - wastewater treatment release - metals: 0Off-site - solid/stab - metals: 0Off-site - storage only: 0Off-site - POTW releases: 391.2Totalon-site releases: 0Totalon-site land releases: NotreportedOtherdisposal - basis of estimate: 0Totalotherdisposal: NotreportedOthersurfaceimpoundment - basis of estimate: 0Totalothersurfaceimpoundments: NotreportedRCRAcSurfaceimpoundment - basis of estimate: 0TotalRCRAcsurfaceimpoundments: NotreportedSurfaceimpoundment - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotalsurfaceimpoundments: NotreportedLandtrtmt/appl farming - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site land treatment: NotreportedOtherlandfills - basis of estimate: 0Totalotheron-site landfills: NotreportedOn-site RCRA subtitle c landfills - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site RCRA subtitle c landfills: NotreportedOn-site landfills - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotalon-site landfills: 0Totalon-site underground injection: NotreportedOn-site ungrnd inj to cl ii-v wells - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site ugrnd inj to cl ii-v wells - pounds: NotreportedOn-site underground inj to c1 i wells - basis of estimate: 0Totalon-site ugrnd inj to cl i wells - pounds: NotreportedOn-site underground inj - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotalon-site underground inj - pounds: 0Totalsurfacewaterdischarge: 0Totalnumberofreceivingstreams: NotreportedDischargestostreamg - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamg - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamg: NotreportedDischargestostreamg - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamf - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamf - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamf: NotreportedDischargestostreamf - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreame - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreame - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreame: NotreportedDischargestostreame - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamd - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamd - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamd: NotreportedDischargestostreamd - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamc - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamc - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamc: NotreportedDischargestostreamc - stream name: NotreportedDischargestostreamb - % from stormwater: NotreportedDischargestostreamb - basis of estimate: NotreportedTotaldischargestostreamb: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 299 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 000067561Casnumber: Chemical Activities and Uses: 0OffSite - POTW Releases 81D: 0OffSite - POTW Releases 81C: NotreportedWasteRockQuantity: 0WasteRockPilemanagedIndicator: NOElementalMetalIncluded: 110000481746FRSFacilityID: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 7: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 6: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 5: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 4: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 3: NotreportedOn-site recycling processes method 2: NotApplicableOn-site recycling processes method 1: NotreportedOn-site energy recovery method 4: NotApplicableOn-site energy recovery method 3: NotreportedOn-site energy recovery method 2: NotApplicableOn-site energy recovery method 1: 0Totalon-site waste management: 0Treatedonsitecurrentyear: 0Recycledonsitecurrentyear: 0Energyrecoveryonsitecurrentyear: 0TotalPOTWtransfer: 7277Totaltransferredoffsiteforfurtherwastemanagement: 0Off-site - transfer to waste broker: 0Totaltransferredoffsitefortreatment: 0Off-site - transfer to waste broker - waste treatment: 0Off-site - other waste treatment: 0Off-site - wastewater treatment - non-metals: 0Off-site - incineration/insignificant heat value: 0Off-site -incineration/thermal treatment: 0Off-site - solid/stab treatment - non metals: 0Off-site - POTW treatment: 7277Totaltransferredoffsiteforenergyrecovery: 0Off-site - transfer to waste broker for energy recovery: 7277Off-site - energy recovery: 0Totaltransferredoffsiteforrecycling: 0Off-site - recycling - transfer to waste broker: 0Off-site - recycling - acid regeneration: 0Off-site - recycling - other reuse or recovery: 0Off-site - recycling -metals recovery: 0Off-site - recycling - solvents/organics recovery: 0Totaltransferredoffsitefordisposal: 0Off-site - disposal - unknown: 0Off-site - disposal - transfer to waste broker: 0Off-site - disposal - other off-site management: 0Off-site - disposal - other land disposal: 0Off-site - disposal - land treatment: 0Off-site - RCRA subtitle c landfills: 0Off-site - other landfills: 0Off-site - other surface impoundments: 0Off-site - RCRA subtitle c surface impoundments: 0Off-site - surface impoundment: 0Off-site - landfills/disposal surface impoundments: 0Off-site - underground injection - class ii-v wells: 0Off-site - underground injection - class 1 wells: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 300 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoZ308constructionmaterials: NoZ307watertreatment: NoZ306wastetreatment: NoZ305flameretardant: NoZ304fuel: NoZ303lubricant: NoZ302degreaser: NoZ301cleaner: NoAncillaryorotheruse: NoZ299other: NoZ205hydraulicfluids: NoZ204refrigerants: NoZ203coolants: NoZ202metalworkingfluids: NoZ201processlubricants: NoUsedasamanufacturingaid: NoZ199other: NoZ106solutionbuffers: NoZ105reactionterminators: NoZ104initiators: NoZ103inhibitors: NoZ102catalysts: NoZ101processsolvents: YesUsedasachemicalprocessingaid: NoProcessed / recycling: NoAsaprocessimpurity: NoRepackaging: NoUsedasanarticlecomponent: NoP299other: NoP211rheologicalmodifiers: NoP210flameretardants: NoP209lubricants: NoP208surfactants: NoP207emulsifiers: NoP206inhibitors: NoP205solvents: NoP204initiators: NoP203reactiondiluents: NoP202dyes: NoP201additives: NoAddedasaformulationcomponent: NoP199other: NoP104initiators: NoP103intermediates: NoP102rawmaterials: NoP101feedstocks: NoUsedasareactant: NoAsamanufacturedimpurity: NoAsabyproduct: NoSaleordistributionofthechemical: NoOn-site use of the chemical: NoImportthechemical: NoProducethechemical: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: METHANOLChemicalname: 1318217280940Documentcontrolnumber: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 301 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Quantityrecycledonsite2nd-following year: 0Quantityrecycledonsitefollowingyear: 0Quantityrecycledonsitecurrentyear: 0Quantityrecycledonsiteprioryear: 7277Energyrecoveryoffsite2nd-following year: 7277Energyrecoveryoffsitefollowingyear: 7277Energyrecoveryoffsitecurrentyear: 9360Energyrecoveryoffsiteprioryear: 0Energyrecoveryonsite2nd-following year: 0Energyrecoveryonsitefollowingyear: 0Energyrecoveryonsitecurrentyear: 0Energyrecoveryonsiteprioryear: 0Otheroff-site releases - 2nd-following year: 0Otheroff-site releases - following year: 0Otheroff-site releases - current year: 0Otheroff-site releases - previous year: 0Off-site limited releases - 2nd-following year: 0Off-site limited releases - following year: 0Off-site limited releases - current year: 0Off-site limited releases - prior year: 391.2Otheron-site releases - 2nd-following year: 391.2Otheron-site releases - following year: 391.2Otheron-site releases - current year: 508.6Otheron-site releases - prior year: 0On-site limited releases - 2nd-following year: 0On-site limited releases - following year: 0On-site limited releases - current year: 0On-site limited releases - prior year: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: METHANOLChemicalname: 1318217280940Documentcontrolnumber: 000067561Casnumber: Detailed Source Reduction Activities and Methods: 6220200808Totalnumberofformssubmitted: 2Numberofformssubmitted: 1988Firstyearthefacilityreported: 2019Lastyearthefacilityreported: ChemicalsIndustryName: 325IndustryCode: ChemicalsSubmittedIndustryName: 325SubmittedIndustryCode: 325413SubmittedPrimaryNAICSCode: PROMEGACORPSubmittedStandardizedParentCompanyName: 089855696SubmittedParentCompanyDBNumber: PROMEGACORPSubmittedParentCompanyName: NotreportedSubmittedTribeName: NotreportedSubmittedBIACode: 93401SubmittedZipCode: CASubmittedState: SAN LUISOBISPOSubmittedCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOSubmittedCity: 277 GRANADADRSubmittedStreet: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCSubmittedFacilityName: NoZ399other: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 302 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream2 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream1 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream1 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NAStream1 - waste stream code: PoundsUnitofmeasure: TRIClassification: METHANOLChemicalname: 1318217280940Documentcontrolnumber: 000067561Casnumber: Detailed On-site Waste Treatment Methods and Efficiency: NotreportedESTAnnREDN4thsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported4thSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported4thSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: Notreported4thSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: Notreported4thSRactivitycodeanddesc: NotreportedESTAnnREDN3rdsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported3rdSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported3rdSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: Notreported3rdSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: Notreported3rdSRactivitycodeanddesc: NotreportedESTAnnREDN2ndsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported2ndSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported2ndSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: Notreported2ndSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: Notreported2ndSRactivitycodeanddesc: NotreportedESTAnnREDN1stsourceREDNactcodeanddesc: Notreported1stSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc3: Notreported1stSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc2: T10 VENDORASSISTANCE1stSRactivityIDmethcodeanddesc1: W67-IMPROVED RINSE EQUIPMENTDESIGN1stSRreductionactivity: PRODUCTIONProdratiooractivity: 86Prodratio/activity index: NotreportedCatastrophicreleasesorotherone-time events: 0Quantitytreatedoffsite2nd-following year: 0Quantitytreatedoffsitefollowingyear: 0Quantitytreatedoffsitecurrentyear: 0Quantitytreatedoffsiteprioryear: 0Quantitytreatedonsite2nd-following year: 0Quantitytreatedonsitefollowingyear: 0Quantitytreatedonsitecurrentyear: 0Quantitytreatedonsiteprioryear: 0Quantityrecycledoffsite2nd-following year: 0Quantityrecycledoffsitefollowingyear: 0Quantityrecycledoffsitecurrentyear: 0Quantityrecycledoffsiteprioryear: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 303 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Totalamounttransferredoffsitefortreatment: 7277Totalamounttransferredoffsiteforenergyrecovery: OtherOffsiteenergyrecoverym56BOE: 7277Offsiteenergyrecoverym56LBS: 0Totalamounttransferredoffsiteforrecycling: 0Totalamounttransferredoffsitefordisposal: PoundsUnitofmeasure: NOOffsitecontrol: NotreportedOffsitecountryid: NotreportedOffsiteprovince: LOSANGELESOffsitecounty: AZUSA, CA91702OffsiteCity,State,Zip: 1704 W. FIRSTSTREETOffsitestreetaddress: VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLCOffsitename: 1Offsitetransfersequencenumber: CAD008302903OffsiteRCRAidnr: TRIClassification: METHANOLChemicalname: 1318217280940Documentcontrolnumber: 000067561Casnumber: Details of Off-site Transfers: NotreportedStream5 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream5 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream5 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream4 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream4 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream4 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream3 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 5: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 4: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 3: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 2: NotreportedStream3 - trtmt method - sequence 1: NotreportedStream3 - waste stream code: NotreportedStream2 - based on operating data: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 8: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 7: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 6: NotreportedStream2 - trtmt method - sequence 5: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 304 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011064RecordId: SLO CITY-CONDITIONALLYEXEMPTProgramElement: 0650ProgramElementCode: FA0005088FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7337City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESLLCName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110000481746DFRURL: 110000481746RegistryID: 1000131165Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER STATE MASTER discharge does not adversely affect water quality. requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN TSCA SUBMITTER Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110000481746RegistryID: FINDS: NotreportedFRSID - Transfer Location: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 305 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66659Longitude: 35.25097Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007436RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005088FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7337City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: 120.66659Longitude: 35.25097Latitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010364RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZWASTE GEN (RCRA-LQG)Program Element: 1050ProgramElementCode: FA0005088FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7337City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: 120.66659Longitude: 35.25097Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007435RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 11+Program Element: 0764ProgramElementCode: FA0005088FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7337City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: 120.66659Longitude: 35.25097Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007437RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005088FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7337City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: 120.66659Longitude: 35.25097Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 306 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1997Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFIC, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 3ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 3TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1996Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFIC, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 3ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 3TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1995Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFIC, INCName: EMI: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 307 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2000Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1999Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFIC, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1998Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFIC, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 308 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2003Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2002Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2001Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 309 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2006Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 002928Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 003ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 003SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 037NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 008CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1775101ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 178TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2005Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.002928Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.003ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.003SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.037NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.008CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.1855101ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.186TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2004Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 310 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2009Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 00976Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 01ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 001SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 8807138ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 883TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2008Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 020496Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 021ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 012SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 169NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 000018CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 2947542ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 299TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2007Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA932100000City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 020496Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 021ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 012SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 169NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 036CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 2947542ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 299TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 311 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.011712Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.012ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.003SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.036NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.008CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.3462239ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.349TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2011Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.011712Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.012ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 3.0000000000000001E-3SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3.5999999999999997E-2NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 8.0000000000000002E-3CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.34622389999999997ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.34899999999999998TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2010Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.011712Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.012ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 3.0000000000000001E-3SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2.5999999999999999E-2NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 6.0000000000000001E-3CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.88722389999999995ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.89000000000000001TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 312 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.01ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.001SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.024NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.0417375CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.4466ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.455TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2014Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.01Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.01ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.001SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.024NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.0417375CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.446333ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.455TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2013Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.50507ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.50507TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2012Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 313 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.04851CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.02468466ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.073843TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2017Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.0496899Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.0496899ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.05707259SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.70668NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.036855CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.02468466ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.0561015TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2016Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.008Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.008ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.001SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.019NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.033CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.55728ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.564TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2015Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.01Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 314 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 340I021178WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCName: NPDES: 0.06476675Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.06476675ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.07438949SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.9211NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.0480375CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.18757625ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.22852555TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2019Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.07304841Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.07304841ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.0839016SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.03888NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.05418CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.21084406ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.2570295TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2835SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 354FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2018Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGABIOSCIENCESName: 0.0496899Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.0654038ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0.07512119SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.93016NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 315 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 277 GranadaDrDischargeAddress: Promega BiosciencesIncDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 09/26/2007EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I021178WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 332584RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 277 GranadaDrOperatorAddress: Promega BiosciencesIncOperatorName: 09/26/2007StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 316 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I021178WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 332584RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 317 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 2835-In Vitro and In Vivo DiagnosticSubstancesPrimarySic: 20-APR-15CertificationDate: DirectorCertifierTitle: DonaldBartonCertifier: San Luis ObispoCreekReceivingWaterName: NDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: don.barton@promega.comOperatorContactEmail: 625OperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-544-8524OperatorContactPhone: EH&SDirectorOperatorContactTitle: DonaldBartonOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 277 GranadaDrOperatorAddress: Promega BiosciencesIncOperatorName: jaime.dwight@promega.comContactEmail: 621ContactPhoneExt: 805-544-8524ContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: JaimeDwightContact: SqFtPlaceSizeUnit: 30000PlaceSize: 09/26/2007StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 09/26/2007ProcessedDate: 05/09/2008ReceivedDate: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 318 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 277 GranadaDrDischargeAddress: Promega BiosciencesIncDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 09/26/2007EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I021178WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 332584RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: Promega BiosciencesIncDischargeName: 277 GranadaDrDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 09/26/2007EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I021178WDID: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: 332584RegulatoryMeasureID: 0AgencyNumber: 3Region: CAS000001NPDESNumber: ActiveFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCName: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 319 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 332584RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 320 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: don.barton@promega.comOperatorContactEmail: 625OperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-544-8524OperatorContactPhone: EH&SDirectorOperatorContactTitle: DonaldBartonOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 277 GranadaDrOperatorAddress: Promega BiosciencesIncOperatorName: jaime.dwight@promega.comContactEmail: 621ContactPhoneExt: 805-544-8524ContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: JaimeDwightContact: SqFtPlaceSizeUnit: 30000PlaceSize: 09/26/2007StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 09/26/2007ProcessedDate: 05/09/2008ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I021178WDID: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 321 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, suchasComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional boardorderTreatToWater: NotreportedPOTW: NotreportedReclamation: 0BaselineFlow: 0DesignFlow: NotreportedSecondaryWasteType: NotreportedSecondaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedWaste2: NotreportedWasteType2: NotreportedPrimaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedSICCode2: 0SICCode: NotreportedAgencyType: NotreportedAgencyTelephone: NotreportedAgencyContact: 0AgencyCity,St,Zip: NotreportedAgencyAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIECESINCAgencyName: NotreportedFacilityContact: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: 3Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining7NPDESNumber: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge thatisFacilityStatus: NotreportedFacilityType: Central Coastal40I015114FacilityID: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCName: WDS: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 2835-In Vitro and In Vivo DiagnosticSubstancesPrimarySic: 20-APR-15CertificationDate: DirectorCertifierTitle: DonaldBartonCertifier: San Luis ObispoCreekReceivingWaterName: NDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 322 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS: 120.66668Longitude: 35.25113Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 09/26/2007EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I021178WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 2835SIC/NAICS: Industrial - In Vitro and In Vivo DiagnosticSubstancesPlace/Project Type: 277 Granada Dr, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: Promega BiosciencesIncAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCName: 120.66668Longitude: 35.25113Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: 02/18/2004TerminationDate: 05/13/1999EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I015114WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 2835SIC/NAICS: Industrial - In Vitro and In Vivo DiagnosticSubstancesPlace/Project Type: 2800 Woods Hollow Rd, Fitchburg, WI53711AgencyAddress: Promega BiosciencesIncAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCESINCName: CIWQS: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 323 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-20-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-16-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-05-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: monthly and records are maintained. HMBP has been updated for CY 2019, employe training isconductedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-12-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-06-2021EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10437187CERSID: 59000SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: Cleanup ProgramSiteCERSDescription: SLT3S1561326CERSID: 210887SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: JBL SCIENTIFICFACILITYName: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 324 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PromegaBiosciencesEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 608) 274-4330,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PromegaCorporationEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.666210Longitude: 35.250730Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10437187ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCFacilityName: 59000SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: EZ Submit Portal". Good emp HMBP has been updated for CY 2018 and submitted electronically viatheEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-14-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically submitted via "EZ Sub A current Hazardous Materials Business Plan will be updatedandEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-22-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Portal. No violations noted dur HMBP is current and has been submitted electronically via EZSubmitEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-20-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 325 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 277 GranadaDrAffiliationAddress: OperatorEntityTitle: Promega BiosciencesIncEntityName: Owner/OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: GeneralManagerEntityTitle: KristenYetterEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JAIMEDWIGHTEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 544-8524,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 277 GranadaDriveAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued)1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 326 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: monthly and records are maintained. HMBP has been updated for CY 2019, employe training isconductedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-12-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-06-2021EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Industrial Facility StormWaterCERSDescription: 657947CERSID: 59000SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 GRANADADRAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: 805) 544-8524,Affiliation Phone: 934017337AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 277GRANADAAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 277 GRANADADRAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 277 GranadaDriveAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JaimeDwightEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 327 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: EZ Submit Portal". Good emp HMBP has been updated for CY 2018 and submitted electronically viatheEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-14-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically submitted via "EZ Sub A current Hazardous Materials Business Plan will be updatedandEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-22-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Portal. No violations noted dur HMBP is current and has been submitted electronically via EZSubmitEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-20-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-20-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-16-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-05-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 328 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 277 GranadaDrAffiliationAddress: OperatorEntityTitle: Promega BiosciencesIncEntityName: Owner/OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: GeneralManagerEntityTitle: KristenYetterEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JAIMEDWIGHTEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 544-8524,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 277 GranadaDriveAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PromegaBiosciencesEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 608) 274-4330,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PromegaCorporationEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.666210Longitude: 35.250730Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10437187ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCFacilityName: 59000SiteID: Coordinates: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 329 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 544-8524,Affiliation Phone: 934017337AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 277GRANADAAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 277 GRANADADRAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 277 GranadaDriveAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JaimeDwightEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC (Continued) 1000131165 TC6926581.2s Page 330 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: RODSOUZAOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: RODSOUZAOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD STELMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: ACMEAUTOBODY1@GMAIL.COMContactEmail: 000-000-0000ContactFax: 805-748-0570ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD STELContactAddress: RODSOUZAContactName: CAL000377946EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD STELHandlerAddress: ACMEAUTOBODYHandlerName: 20120907DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 515 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster H 0.098 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 167 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East 645 TANK FARM RD STE L CAL000377946 H95 RCRA NonGen / NLRACMEAUTOBODY 1024835623 TC6926581.2s Page 331 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-748-0570Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD STELOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: RODSOUZAOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-748-0570Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD STELOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: RODSOUZAOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: ACME AUTOBODY (Continued)1024835623 TC6926581.2s Page 332 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ACMEAUTOBODYHandlerName: 20120907ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: ACME AUTOBODY (Continued)1024835623 KARLDEARDORFFOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD. SUITEGMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: BEN.VANHAMERSVELD@SLOSAILANDCANVAS.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 760-420-7905ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD. SUITEGContactAddress: BEN VANHAMERSVELDContactName: CAC003093346EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD. SUITEGHandlerAddress: SLO SAIL ANDCANVASHandlerName: 20201117DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 515 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster H 0.098 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 167 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East 645 TANK FARM RD. SUITE G CAC003093346 H96 RCRA NonGen / NLRSLOSAILANDCANVAS 1026487167 TC6926581.2s Page 333 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20201117HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: BEN VANHAMERSVELDOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: SLO SAIL AND CANVAS (Continued)1026487167 TC6926581.2s Page 334 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: FIBER, YARN, AND THREADMILLSNAICSDescription: 313110NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SLO SAIL ANDCANVASHandlerName: 20201117ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 760-420-7905Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD. SUITEGOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: BEN VANHAMERSVELDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-479-6122Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD. SUITEGOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KARLDEARDORFFOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: SLO SAIL AND CANVAS (Continued) 1026487167 TC6926581.2s Page 335 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.64593Longitude: 35.24648Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011406RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0007392FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM #FAddress: STAR AUTOMOTIVE - MOVEDName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 515 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster H 0.098 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 167 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East 645 TANK FARM #F N/A H97 CUPAListingsSTARAUTOMOTIVE - MOVED S123132114 San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ACME AUTOBODYEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 645 TANK FARM RD #LAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439617CERSID: 89564SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD #LAddress: ACME AUTOBODYName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 515 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster H 0.098 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 167 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East CUPAListings645TANKFARMRD #L N/A H98 CERS HAZWASTEACMEAUTOBODY S110744228 TC6926581.2s Page 336 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0012503RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0008235FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 645 TANK FARM RD #LAddress: ACME AUTOBODYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: ACME AUTO BODY (Continued)S110744228 NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: TROY VANMIDDENDORPOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: THOMASAKERSOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDO ST 3580 SUELDOSMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: TROYVMD@ZONE5TECH.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-602-6493ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDO ST 3580 SUELDOSContactAddress: TROY VANMIDDENDORPContactName: CAC003090978EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDO ST 3580 SUELDOSHandlerAddress: ZONE 5TECHNOLOGIESHandlerName: 20201102DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 520 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster K 0.098 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW 3580 SUELDO ST 3580 SUELDO S CAC003090978 K99 RCRA NonGen / NLRZONE5TECHNOLOGIES 1026484867 TC6926581.2s Page 337 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TROY VANMIDDENDORPOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20201106HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: ZONE 5 TECHNOLOGIES (Continued)1026484867 TC6926581.2s Page 338 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: MACHINE TOOLMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 333517NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ZONE 5TECHNOLOGIESHandlerName: 20201102ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-748-2244Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: THOMASAKERSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-602-6493Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDO ST 3580 SUELDOSOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: ZONE 5 TECHNOLOGIES (Continued) 1026484867 TC6926581.2s Page 339 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: FRANKMARTINOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: DELINDUSTRIESOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTREETMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: FMARTIN@DELOZONE.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-541-1601ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTREETContactAddress: FRANKMARTINContactName: CAC002965548EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTREETHandlerAddress: DELINDUSTRIESHandlerName: 20180608DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 520 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster K 0.098 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW 3580 SUELDO STREET CAC002965548 K100 RCRA NonGen / NLRDELINDUSTRIES 1024745777 TC6926581.2s Page 340 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-1601Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTEETOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: DELINDUSTRIESOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-1601Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTREETOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: FRANKMARTINOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180831HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: DEL INDUSTRIES (Continued)1024745777 TC6926581.2s Page 341 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENTSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56299NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: DELINDUSTRIESHandlerName: 20180608ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: DEL INDUSTRIES (Continued)1024745777 120.66596Longitude: 35.25152Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008048RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005369FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTAddress: DELINDUSTRIESName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110013848916RegistryID: FINDS: CERS CIWQS 520 ft.WDSSite4of4inclusterK 0.098 mi.NPDES Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8 EMISANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW CUPAListings3580SUELDOST/3877 LONG ST N/A K101 FINDSSANLUISSOURDOUGH 1006825844 TC6926581.2s Page 342 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2051SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2047FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2002Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017338City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDO ST/3877 LONGSTAddress: SAN LUISSOURDOUGHName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 15ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 15TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 2051SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2047FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1998Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017338City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDO ST.Address: SAN LUISSOURDOUGHName: EMI: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020205RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0014755FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTAddress: EMPIRICAL SYSTEMS AEROSPACE (ESAERO)Name: 120.66596Longitude: 35.25152Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008047RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005369FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTAddress: DELINDUSTRIESName: SAN LUIS SOURDOUGH (Continued)1006825844 TC6926581.2s Page 343 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I013927WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 185726RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 3580 SueldoStOperatorAddress: San LuisSourdoughOperatorName: 06/15/2006StatusDate: TerminatedStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I013927WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTAddress: SAN LUISSOURDOUGHName: NPDES: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 17ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 17TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: YCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS SOURDOUGH (Continued)1006825844 TC6926581.2s Page 344 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: San Luis ObispoCreekReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: 805-782-8935EmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-782-8935OperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: BRIANFranciscoOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 3580 SueldoStOperatorAddress: San LuisSourdoughOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 8057828935ContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: BRIANFranciscoContact: SqFtPlaceSizeUnit: 30000PlaceSize: 06/15/2006StatusDate: TerminatedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: 05/09/2008ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: SAN LUIS SOURDOUGH (Continued)1006825844 TC6926581.2s Page 345 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, suchasComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional boardorderTreatToWater: NotreportedPOTW: NotreportedReclamation: 0BaselineFlow: 0DesignFlow: NotreportedSecondaryWasteType: NotreportedSecondaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedWaste2: NotreportedWasteType2: NotreportedPrimaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedSICCode2: 0SICCode: PrivateAgencyType: 8057828935AgencyTelephone: BRIANFRANCISCOAgencyContact: San Luis Obispo934017338AgencyCity,St,Zip: 3580 SueldoStAgencyAddress: SAN LUISSOURDOUGHAgencyName: BRIANFRANCISCOFacilityContact: 8057828935FacilityTelephone: 3Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining7NPDESNumber: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge thatisFacilityStatus: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquidorFacilityType: Central Coastal40I013927FacilityID: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 3580 SueldoStAddress: SAN LUISSOURDOUGHName: WDS: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 2051-Bread and Other Bakery Products, Except Cookies andCrackersPrimarySic: SAN LUIS SOURDOUGH (Continued) 1006825844 TC6926581.2s Page 346 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110013848916CERSID: 492155SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDO ST/3877 LONGSTAddress: SAN LUISSOURDOUGHName: CERS: 120.66571Longitude: 35.25124Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I013927WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 2051SIC/NAICS: Crackers Industrial - Bread and Other Bakery Products, Except CookiesandPlace/Project Type: 3580 Sueldo St, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: San LuisSourdoughAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3580 SUELDOSTAddress: SAN LUISSOURDOUGHName: SAN LUIS SOURDOUGH (Continued) 1006825844 PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007861RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005161FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3563 SUELDOSTAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 536 ft. 0.102 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3563 SUELDO ST N/A 102 CUPAListingsPROMEGABIOSCIENCES, INC S117845172 TC6926581.2s Page 347 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007628RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005161FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3563 SUELDOSTAddress: PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES, INC (Continued) S117845172 FA0008228FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #6Address: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INCName: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0012493RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0008228FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #6Address: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INCName: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020720RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0761ProgramElementCode: FA0008228FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #6Address: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439608CERSID: 556212SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #6Address: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 557 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster I 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SW CUPAListings207SUBURBANRDUNIT #6 N/A I103 CERS HAZWASTEKCIENVIRONMENTAL, INC S110744226 TC6926581.2s Page 348 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Envision database. HMBP has been updated for CY 2018, and electronically entered intotheEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-06-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via EZ Submit Por Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been completed andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-06-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-26-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via E Z Submit Porta Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-19-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10439608CERSID: 556212SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 207 SUBURBAN RD UNIT #6Address: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INCName: CERS: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0012494RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC (Continued) S110744226 TC6926581.2s Page 349 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 227 SUBURBAN RD UNIT6AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CurtBoutwellEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-3311,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KCI Environmental, Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-3311,Affiliation Phone: 93403AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: P.O. BOX3307AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Submit Portal. No violations HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 and submitted electronically viaEZEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-15-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC (Continued)S110744226 TC6926581.2s Page 350 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: PresidentEntityTitle: CurtBoutwellEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93403AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: P.O. BOX3307AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CurtBoutwellEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC (Continued) S110744226 NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: PAUL@OAKCOASTCAPITAL.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-440-1839ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 684 HIGUERA ST.Contact Address: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLCContactName: CAC003095162EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 660 TANK FARM RD.Handler Address: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLCHandlerName: 20201201DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 590 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster L 0.112 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 169 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East 660 TANK FARM RD.CAC003095162 L104 RCRA NonGen / NLRNICKTOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLC 1026488922 TC6926581.2s Page 351 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLCOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 684 HIGUERA ST.Mailing Address: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLC (Continued)1026488922 TC6926581.2s Page 352 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENTSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56299NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLCHandlerName: 20201201ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-440-1839Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 684 HIGUERA ST.Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-440-1839Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 684 HIGUERA ST.Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20201203HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLC (Continued) 1026488922 TC6926581.2s Page 353 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: NICK TOMPKINS/NKT TFB II, LLC (Continued) 1026488922 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 5.3Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: PFAS: 600 ft. 0.114 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 163 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA ESE N/A 105 PFASWELL01, STANDBY S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 354 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 0.89Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 355 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 0.89Value: Qualifier: PFUNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 0.89Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 356 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 0.89Value: Qualifier: HFPA-DAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 357 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Qualifier: 11ClPF3OUDSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 0.89Value: Qualifier: 9ClPF3ONSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 358 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 0.89Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 0.89Value: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 359 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 8/15/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 11Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 360 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8/15/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 12Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000726GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01, STANDBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 8/15/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 4.8Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000726-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 TC6926581.2s Page 361 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000726GeoTrackerURL: 120.645611Longitude: 35.246235Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: WELL 01, STANDBY (Continued)S127520838 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0016093RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0009623FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 220 SUBURBAN RD STEAAddress: TRIPLETTHARPSName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0016094RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0009623FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 220 SUBURBAN RD STEAAddress: TRIPLETTHARPSName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 600 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster M 0.114 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SW 220 SUBURBAN RD STE A N/A M106 CUPAListingsTRIPLETTHARPS S115950095 RICKERNSTROMContactName: CAC002993694EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: BEHIND 650 TANK FARM RD.Handler Address: BOX KITE BARN YARD,INC.Handler Name: 20181219DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 620 ft. 0.117 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 169 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East BEHIND 650 TANK FARM RD.CAC002993694 107 RCRA NonGen / NLRBOXKITEBARNYARD,INC.1024773775 TC6926581.2s Page 362 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: RICKERNSTROMOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: KEITHGODFREYOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 950 ORCUTT RD.Mailing Address: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: RICK@BOXKITEBARNYARD.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-704-9168ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 950 ORCUTT RD.Contact Address: BOX KITE BARN YARD,INC. (Continued)1024773775 TC6926581.2s Page 363 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: BOX KITE BARN YARD,INC.Handler Name: 20181219ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-704-9168Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 950 ORCUTT RD.Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: RICKERNSTROMOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-6650Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 950 ORCUTT RD.Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KEITHGODFREYOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20181220HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: BOX KITE BARN YARD,INC. (Continued)1024773775 TC6926581.2s Page 364 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENTSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56299NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: BOX KITE BARN YARD,INC. (Continued) 1024773775 NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: MARK SNIDER/PRESIDENTOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: SNIDER PRECISION, INCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 648 CLARIONCTMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: MARK@SNIDERPRECISION.COMContactEmail: 000-000-0000ContactFax: 805-541-8338ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 648 CLARIONCTContactAddress: MARK SNIDER/PRESIDENTContactName: CAL000225300EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 648 CLARIONCTHandlerAddress: SNIDER PRECISION, INC.Handler Name: 20011106DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 654 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster N 0.124 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 151 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 648 CLARION CT CAL000225300 N108 RCRA NonGen / NLRSNIDERPRECISION, INC.1024801218 TC6926581.2s Page 365 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 648 CLARIONCTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: MARK SNIDER/PRESIDENTOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: SNIDER PRECISION, INC. (Continued)1024801218 TC6926581.2s Page 366 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: MACHINESHOPSNAICSDescription: 33271NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SNIDER PRECISION, INC.Handler Name: 20011106ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-8338Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 648 CLARIONCTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: SNIDER PRECISION, INCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-8338Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: SNIDER PRECISION, INC. (Continued) 1024801218 CANDACE HUMAN, APADMINISTRATORContactName: CAL000267653EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTHandlerAddress: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCHandlerName: 20030313DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 660 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster N 0.125 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/8 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 645 CLARION CT CAL000267653 N109 RCRA NonGen / NLRSPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONINC 1024806196 TC6926581.2s Page 367 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: CANDACE HUMAN, APADMINISTRATOROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: CHUMAN@SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTION.COMContactEmail: 805-543-1712ContactFax: 805-543-1706ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCRTContactAddress: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)1024806196 TC6926581.2s Page 368 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCHandlerName: 20030313ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-1706Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-1706Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCRTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CANDACE HUMAN, APADMINISTRATOROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)1024806196 TC6926581.2s Page 369 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: WHEATFARMINGNAICSDescription: 11114NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) 1024806196 120.64697Longitude: 35.24411Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0014976RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0008909FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTAddress: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONName: 120.64697Longitude: 35.24411Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0014975RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0008909FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTAddress: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438627CERSID: 155710SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTAddress: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 660 ft.HWTSSite3of3inclusterN 0.125 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/8 HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE CUPAListings645CLARIONCT N/A N110 CERS HAZWASTESPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONINC S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 370 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2012Year: 0.3Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: TXD077603371TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.0075Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: 121 - Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) withmetalsCAWasteCode: NVT330010000TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.025Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: 791 - Liquids with pH <= 2CAWasteCode: NVT330010000TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.5Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: 291 - LatexwasteCAWasteCode: NVT330010000TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.1625Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: NVT330010000TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.10000Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2018Year: 645 CLARIONCTMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055431706Telephone: CANDACE HUMAN APADMINISTRATORContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 645 CLARIONCTAddress: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCName: HAZNET: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 371 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 1000WasteQuantity: 0.5QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: D001RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 002341840SKSManifestID: 20100615ReceiptDate: 1/14/2011 18:30:31CreationDate: 20100602ShipmentDate: CAL000267653GenEPAID: 2010Year: Additional Info: 4 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 0.7Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: 291 - LatexwasteCAWasteCode: NVT330010000TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2010Year: 0.225Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2010Year: 0.0125Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: CA Waste Code: TXD077603371TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.4575Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteDisposalMethod: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: TXD077603371TSDEPAID: CAL000267653Gepaid: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 372 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/30/2010 18:30:29CreationDate: 20100224ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 450WasteQuantity: 0.225QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003472461JJKManifestID: 20100524ReceiptDate: 12/16/2010 18:31:14CreationDate: 20100504ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 600WasteQuantity: 0.3QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 291 - LatexwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYNEVADATransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 002341839SKSManifestID: 20100617ReceiptDate: 1/24/2011 18:30:08CreationDate: 20100602ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 373 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 23409935ManifestID: 20050322ReceiptDate: 5/27/2005 18:30:42CreationDate: 20050309ShipmentDate: CAL000267653GenEPAID: 2005Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 800WasteQuantity: 0.4QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 291 - LatexwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYNEVADATransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: TRIADTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 001962634SKSManifestID: 20100209ReceiptDate: 10/26/2010 18:30:16CreationDate: 20100126ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: D001AdditionalCode3: D035AdditionalCode2: F003AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 800WasteQuantity: 0.4QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 001963044SKSManifestID: 20100315ReceiptDate: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 374 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174211SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 9/17/2012 22:15:10CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 600WasteQuantity: 0.3QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: D001RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174211SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 9/17/2012 22:15:10CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: CAL000267653GenEPAID: 2012Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 350WasteQuantity: 0.175QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NONERCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NVD980895338TSDFAltEPAID: 21 CENTURYEMITransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PHILIP TRANSPORATION & REMEDIATIONINCTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 375 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.0125QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174211SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 9/17/2012 22:15:10CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 250WasteQuantity: 0.125QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: D001RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174211SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 9/17/2012 22:15:10CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: D001AdditionalCode3: D035AdditionalCode2: F003AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 600WasteQuantity: 0.3QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 376 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.0075QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: D002RCRACode: molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, 121 - Alkaline solution (pH >12.5) with metals (antimony, arsenic,Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYNEVADATransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174212SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 8/29/2012 22:15:17CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 50WasteQuantity: 0.025QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: D001RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174213SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 9/17/2012 22:15:10CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 377 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174213SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 9/17/2012 22:15:10CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 325WasteQuantity: 0.1625QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYNEVADATransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174212SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 8/29/2012 22:15:17CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 1000WasteQuantity: 0.5QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 291 - LatexwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYNEVADATransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174212SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 8/29/2012 22:15:17CreationDate: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 378 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: WAD991281767TSDFEPAID: 21ST CENTURYEMITrans2Name: CAR000164012Trans2EPAID: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIALSERVICESTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 003471288JJKManifestID: 20080926ReceiptDate: 3/9/2009 18:30:09CreationDate: 20080908ShipmentDate: CAL000267653GenEPAID: 2008Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 50WasteQuantity: 0.025QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: D002RCRACode: 791 - Liquids with pH < 2 792 Liquids with pH < 2 withmetalsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYNEVADATransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: TRIAD TRANSPORTINCTrans2Name: OKD981588791Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003174212SKSManifestID: 20120409ReceiptDate: 8/29/2012 22:15:17CreationDate: 20120323ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.0075QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: D001RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXD077603371TSDFEPAID: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 379 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TO YOUR CUPA INSPECTOR LINNEA FAULKNER PREFERABLY VIA EMAIL AT LICENSED HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE DISPOSAL RECORD WASTE ANTIFREEZE AND FILTERS) MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSE THROUGH A PROMPTLY BUT NO LATER THAN 2-12-18, ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE (USED OIL, LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS. LAST RECORD INDICATES ACCUMULATION OF JAN 2017. PROPERLY DISPOSED OF THROUGH A LICENSED HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER AT WASTE BEYOND PERMITTED TIME PERIOD. YOUR HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE Returned to compliance on 01/25/2018. DISCONTINUE STORINGHAZARDOUSViolationNotes: greater than one kilogram for more than 90 days. hold acutely hazardous waste or extremely hazardous waste in an amount Regulations section 262.34(d), (e) and (f). (3) The generator does not The generator complies with the requirements of 40 Code of Federal hazardous waste accumulated onsite never exceeds 6,000 kilograms. (2) if all of the following conditions are met: (1) The quantity of miles) for a generator who generates less than 1000 kilogram per month disposal within 180 days (or 270 days if waste is transported over 200 Failure to send hazardous waste offsite for treatment, storage, orViolationDescription: 6.5, Section(s) 25123.3(h)(1) HSC 6.5 25123.3(h)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 01-12-2018ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: PLACE USED OIL DRUM IN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. Returned to compliance on 11/18/2016. SEE UT7, UT8 AND UT11 ABOVE.Violation Notes: hazardous waste other than minimal amounts of vehicle fuel. Failure to prevent intentional contamination of used oil withotherViolationDescription: Section(s) 25250.7(a) HSC 6.5 25250.7(a) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 09-23-2016ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10438627CERSID: 155710SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTAddress: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONName: CERS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 165WasteQuantity: 0.0825QuantityTons: Site H111 - Stabilization Or Chemical Fixation Prior To Disposal AtAnotherMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 380 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YOUR CUPA INSPECTOR. SITE WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE DISPOSAL RECEIPT TO Returned to compliance on 11/03/2016. PROPERLY RECYCLE USED OILONViolationNotes: Hazardous Waste Generator Program - Operations/Maintenance - GeneralViolationDescription: Section(s) Multiple HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 09-23-2016ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: Returned to compliance on 01/25/2018. SEE VIOLATIOGT08ViolationNotes: hazardous waste other than minimal amounts of vehicle fuel. Failure to prevent intentional contamination of used oil withotherViolationDescription: Section(s) 25250.7(a) HSC 6.5 25250.7(a) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 01-12-2018ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: Returned to compliance on 11/18/2016. PROPERLY LABEL USED OIL DRUM.Violation Notes: date. characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation name and address of the generator, physical and chemical portable tanks with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containersandViolationDescription: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-23-2016ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: WASTE CONTAINERS AS STATED IN THE VIOLATION TEXT. Returned to compliance on 03/22/2018. PROPERLY LABEL ALLHAZARDOUSViolationNotes: date. characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation name and address of the generator, physical and chemical portable tanks with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containersandViolationDescription: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 01-12-2018ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: LFAULKNER@CO.SLO.CA.US. SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 381 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07-14-2020ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: LFAULKNER@CO.SLO.CA.US. FROM MAY 2016 TO YOUR CUPA INSPECTOR, PREFERABLY VIA EMAIL AT Returned to compliance on 11/03/2016. SUBMIT USED OIL DISPOSALRECEIPTViolationNotes: designated facility which received the waste. for transport shall be kept until receiving a signed copy from the transporter. The manifest signed at the time the waste was accepted three years from the date the waste was accepted by the initial Failure to keep a copy of each properly signed manifest for atleastViolationDescription: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a) 22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-23-2016ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: OF THE MANIFIEST TO YOUR CUPA INSPECTOR. DISPOSED OF THROUGH A LICENSED HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULER. SUBMIT A COPY HAULER. IF NOT RECYCLING METAL FILTERS, ALL FILTERS MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THE OTHER FILTERS THROUGH A LICENSED HAZARDOUS WASTE FILTERS FROM NON-METAL FILTERS. PROPERLY RECYCLE METAL FILTERS AND Returned to compliance on 03/21/2018. SEGREGATE RECYCLABLEMETALViolationNotes: with the requirements. Failure to properly manage used oil and/or fuel filters inaccordanceViolationDescription: Section(s) 25250.22 HSC 6.5 25250.22 - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 01-12-2018ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: INSPECTOR, PREFERABLY VIA EMAIL AT LFAULKNER@CO.SLO.CA.US. TRAINING ON EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND HAZARD COMMUNICATION TO YOUR CUPA Returned to compliance on 11/15/2016. SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION OFEMPLOYEEViolationNotes: records for a minimum of three years. hazardous material or failure to document and maintain training safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a Failure to provide initial and annual training to all employeesinViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25505(a)(4) HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 09-23-2016ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 382 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-22-2018EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-18-2016EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 09-23-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG. CHEMICAL INVENTORY. SUBMIT THE UPDATE ELECTRONICALLY AT Returned to compliance on 11/21/2016. ADD DIESEL FUEL ON TRUCKTOViolationNotes: at or above reportable quantities. inventory information for all reportable hazardous materials on site Failure to complete and electronically submit hazardousmaterialViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 09-23-2016ViolationDate: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONSiteName: 155710SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: of the Form S Owner/Operator page to 2020. HMBP. At a minimum, please change the certification date at the bottom changes. Please log into ezsubmitslogov.org to verify and update your certified annually, or within 30 days if there are significant HMBP) was last submitted on 9/27/2020. State law requires HMBPs to be Returned to compliance on 08/12/2020. Your haz mat businessplanViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 383 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoViolationsFound: 11-21-2016EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-03-2016EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 09-23-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-06-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-14-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-21-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-06-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 384 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 01-12-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-12-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-21-2016EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-29-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-29-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 07-14-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 385 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.646990Longitude: 35.244100Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10438627ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONFacilityName: 155710SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-12-2020EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE AREA. SUBMIT ELECTRONICALLY. SEALER AND ADD ANTIFREEZE; REVISE SITE MAP TO REFLECT THE NEW LOCATION FOLLOW UP ACTIONS: REVISE CHEMICAL INVENTORY TO REMOVEDCONCRETEEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-07-2019EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: WITHIN 7 DAYS. 805-781-4917 OR LCHANDLER@CO.SLO.CA.US TO SCHEDULE A REINSPECTION NOT OBSERVED" WILL BE AT THE REINSPECTION. CONTACT LINNEA CHANDLER AT YARD MANAGER NOT AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION; THEREFORE, ITEMSMARKEDEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-21-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-09-2016EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 386 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CandaceHumanEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-1706,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Rudolph C. BachmannEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: PresidentEntityTitle: Rudolph C. BachmannEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 645 CLARIONCTAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-1706,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 645CLARIONAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONEntityName: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 387 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 645 CLARIONCTFacilityAddress: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2003-03-13 12:48:05.40300IssuedEPAIDDate: WheatFarmingNAICSDescription: 11114NAICSCode: 2003-03-13 12:48:05.437CreateDate: CAL000267653EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 645 CLARIONCRTContactAddress: CANDACE HUMAN, APADMINISTRATORContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 645 CLARIONCTOwnerAddress: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 645 CLARIONCTMailingAddress2: SCIMailingAddress: CANDACEHUMANMailingName: 07/02/2020LastActDate: 03/13/2003CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000267653EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 645 CLARIONCTAddress: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTIONINCName: HWTS: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SPECIALTYCONSTRUCTIONEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 645 ClarionCourtAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Rudolph C. BachmannEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued)S113125402 TC6926581.2s Page 388 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) S113125402 ContractorCleanupBy: Merchant/BusinessSpillSite: NotreportedWaterway: NoWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: NotreportedOESTime: NotreportedOESDate: 04/06/2018OESnotification: 18-2250OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10823401CERSID: 555333SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: KOMPOGASSLOName: CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS CIWQS 661 ft.NPDESSite1of3inclusterO 0.125 mi.EMI Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SSE CHMIRS4300OLDSANTAFEROAD N/A O111 CERS HAZWASTEKOMPOGASSLOLLC S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 389 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FA0014090FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: KOMPOGASSLOName: 120.65069Longitude: 35.24057Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019558RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0014090FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: KOMPOGASSLOName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: fuel tank on a rumble strip causing the release form a truck coming onsite and it ruptured the Per the caller they were receiving adeliveryDescription: NotreportedComments: NoFatals: NoInjuries: NoEvacs: No#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#3 Pipeline: No#2 Pipeline: No#1 Pipeline: NotreportedNumberofFatalities: NotreportedNumberofInjuries: NotreportedEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: 20QuantityReleased: DieselSubstance: NotreportedEDate: NotreportedSiteType: YesContained: NotreportedAmount: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentAdminAgency: 04/04/2018IncidentDate: HZIAgency: 2018Year: 1600Date/Time: NotreportedOther: Gal(s)Measure: PETROLEUMType: NotreportedOther: NotreportedMeasure: NotreportedType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 390 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Kompogas SLOLLCOperatorName: 03/20/2019StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I028107WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCName: NPDES: 0.03789462534Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.053484717ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 1.9218615984SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.70725392NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.09375163CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.083392811691ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.119334404TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 4953SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 3085FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2019Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: HZUI KOMPOGAS SLO, INCName: EMI: 120.65069Longitude: 35.24057Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019559RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 391 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 03/20/2019EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I028107WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 4953(+)SIC/NAICS: Industrial - RefuseSystemsPlace/Project Type: 4300 Old Santa Fe Road, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: Kompogas SLOLLCAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCName: CIWQS: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: Kompogas SLOLLCDischargeName: 4300 Old Santa FeRoadDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 03/20/2019EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I028107WDID: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: 505878RegulatoryMeasureID: 0AgencyNumber: 3Region: CAS000001NPDESNumber: ActiveFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCName: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 4300 Old Santa FeRoadOperatorAddress: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 392 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ARROW) FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS LABEL STREETS ON MAP IDENTIFY ELECTRONICALLY. THE MAP MUST HAVE THESE ELEMENTS: ORIENTATION (NORTH Returned to compliance on 09/11/2019. SUBMIT AN ANNOTATED SITEMAPViolationNotes: required content. Failure to complete and electronically submit a site map withallViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-02-2019ViolationDate: KompogasSLOSiteName: 555333SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: PLAN ELECTRONICALLY. Returned to compliance on 09/11/2019. SUBMIT THE EMERGENCYRESPONSEViolationNotes: hazardous material. response plan and procedures for a release or threatened release of a Failure to establish and electronically submit an adequateemergencyViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-02-2019ViolationDate: KompogasSLOSiteName: 555333SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10823401CERSID: 555333SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: KOMPOGASSLOName: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 4300 Old Santa FeRoadAffiliationAddress: OperatorEntityTitle: Kompogas SLOLLCEntityName: Owner/OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Industrial Facility StormWaterCERSDescription: 870397CERSID: 535108SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCName: CERS: 120.65008Longitude: 35.24035Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 393 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FORM TO CUPA INSPECTOR LINNEA CHANDLER AT LCHANDER@CO.SLO.CA.US. FORM. SUBMIT THE DETERMINATION WITH CALCULATIONS AND PRE-REGISTRATION SULFIDE COMPONENT IN THE PROCESS. COMPLETE THE CALARP PRE-REGISTRATION THE AMOUNT IN POUNDS OF BIOGAS (THE MIXTURE) AND JUST THE HYDROGEN DIESEL, USED OIL, WASTE ANTIFREEZE, CRUDE GLYCEROL SOLUTION. DETERMINE ELECTRONICALLY. CHEMICALS OBSERVED AT OR ABOVE REPORTABLE QUANTITIES: 55-GAL LIQUID, 500LBS SOLID, OR 200 CUFT TOXIC/REACTIVE GAS) Returned to compliance on 09/11/2019. SUBMIT THE CHEMICALINVENTORYViolationNotes: at or above reportable quantities. inventory information for all reportable hazardous materials on site Failure to complete and electronically submit hazardousmaterialViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-02-2019ViolationDate: KompogasSLOSiteName: 555333SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: LCHANDLER@CO.SLO.CA.US. RECORDS TO YOUR CUPA INSPECTOR PREFERABLY VIA EMAIL AT ELECTRONICALLY, COPIES OF THE USED OIL AND WASTE ANTIFREEZE DISPOSAL Returned to compliance on 09/11/2019. SUBMIT, PREFERABLYViolationNotes: hazardous waste other than minimal amounts of vehicle fuel. Failure to prevent intentional contamination of used oil withotherViolationDescription: Section(s) 25250.7(a) HSC 6.5 25250.7(a) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 08-02-2019ViolationDate: KompogasSLOSiteName: 555333SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: VIA EMAIL TO CUPA INSPECTOR LINNEA CHANDLER AT LCHANDLER@CO.SLO.CA.US. TRAINING ON HAZARD COMMUNICATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE, PREFERABLY Returned to compliance on 09/11/2019. SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION OFEMPLOYEEViolationNotes: records for a minimum of three years. hazardous material or failure to document and maintain training safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a Failure to provide initial and annual training to all employeesinViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25505(a)(4) HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-02-2019ViolationDate: KompogasSLOSiteName: 555333SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: ESO) FOR ELECTRICAL POWER LOCATION OF SPILL CONTROL EQUIPMENT LOCATION OF EMERGENCY SHUT OFF OF WATER SHUT OFF LOCATION OF STORM DRAINS, CATCH BASIN, SEWER LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION OF NATURAL GAS SHUT OFF LOCATION MATERIALS/WASTE STORAGE LOCATIONS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE EQUIPMENT STRUCTURES LABEL ACCESS/EGRESS/EVACUATION AREAS LOCATIONS OF HAZARDOUS KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 394 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-20-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: ITEMS MARKED N/A WERE NOT PART OF THISREPORTEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-11-2019EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: FROM TODAY. CUPA INSPECTION REPORT ISSUED AUGUST 5, 2019. COMPLIANCE IS 30DAYSEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 08-02-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-11-2019EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: CERS.CALEPA.CA.GOV. BUSINESS PLAN ELECTRONICALLY; EITHER AT WWW.EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG OR Returned to compliance on 09/11/2019. SUBMIT THE HAZARDOUSMATERIALSViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-02-2019ViolationDate: KompogasSLOSiteName: 555333SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 395 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: OperationsManagerEntityTitle: JoePypeEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KompogasSLOEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 360) 846-8062,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JosephPypeEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-20-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 08-02-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 TC6926581.2s Page 396 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 4300 Old Santa FeRoadAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 4300 Old Santa FeRoadAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JoePypeEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JoePypeEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)S123295545 NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: JOE.PYPE@HZ-INOVA.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 360-846-8062ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93410ContactCity,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FEROADContactAddress: JOEPYPEContactName: CAL000444766EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCHandlerName: 20190325DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 661 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster O 0.125 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4300 OLD SANTA FE RD CAL000444766 O112 RCRA NonGen / NLRKOMPOGASSLOLLC 1025871650 TC6926581.2s Page 397 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20190628HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: YesRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: JOEPYPEOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCOwnerName: NORCROSS, GA30092MailingCity,State,Zip: 3930 E JONES BRIDGE RD STE200MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)1025871650 TC6926581.2s Page 398 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: NATURAL GASDISTRIBUTIONNAICSDescription: 221210NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCHandlerName: 20190325ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 360-846-8062Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93410Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4300 OLD SANTA FEROADOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JOEPYPEOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 678-987-2500Owner/Operator Telephone: NORCROSS, GA30092Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3930 E JONES BRIDGE RD STE200Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KOMPOGAS SLOLLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)1025871650 TC6926581.2s Page 399 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: KOMPOGAS SLO LLC (Continued)1025871650 Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 895 Aerovista Place, Suite101AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: GREG BISHOP - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Entity Name: Regional BoardCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Cleanup ProgramSiteCERSDescription: SL203031242CERSID: 236942SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TANK FARMROADName: CERS: 2030300PCA: NoCaseTypeOtherGrndWtr: YesCaseTypeDrinkingWaterAqfr: NoCaseTypeDrinkinWaterWell: NoCaseTypeSurfaceWater: NoCaseTypeSoilImpacted: NoCaseTypeUndetermined: Drinking Water AquiferaffectedCaseType: Remedial Action Plan Underway/OngoingFacilityStatus: SLICProgramType: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedDateFirstReported: BCPUNKNOWNRPCity,St,Zip: P O BOX1069RPAddress: NotreportedRPNumber: NotreportedRPPhone: NotreportedRPContact: UNOCALCORPResponsibleParty: UNOCALCOR534RBCaseIn: RBDDiscovered: 1994-01-01 00:00:00EnteredIntoDatabase: SL203031242RegionalBoardCase#: NotreportedLeakSiteCrossStreet: 3Region: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TANK FARMROADName: SLIC REG 3: 687 ft. Site 18 of 19 in cluster J 0.130 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CERSTANKFARMRD N/A J113 CPS-SLICUNOCAL - PIPELINE-TANK FARM ROAD S106982334 TC6926581.2s Page 400 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAgencyTelephone: BILLSHARRERAgencyContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO93401AgencyCity,St,Zip: 276 TANK FARMRDAgencyAddress: UNOCALCORPORATIONAgencyName: DENNISANDERSONFacilityContact: 8055952069FacilityTelephone: 3Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining7NPDESNumber: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge thatisFacilityStatus: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquidorFacilityType: Central Coastal40I014475FacilityID: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS TANK FARMROADName: WDS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: UPLOADED TO GEOTRACKER. SITE. 05-08-2018: ADDITIONAL HARD COPY FILES ARE STILL PENDING REGION 3 RECORD STORAGE HAVE BEEN UPLOADED TO GEOTRACKER FOR THIS groundwater monitoring program. 08-24-2017: SOME HARD COPY FILES FROM The pipeline conveyed crude oil and it is currently in an active Storage Facility located on Tank Farm Road in the San Luis Obispo. This case involves the Old Unocal Pipeline that services theBulkSiteHistory: CrudeOilPotentialContaminantsofConcern: than drinking water) Aquifer used for drinking water supply, Other Groundwater (usesotherPotentialMediaAffected: RegionalBoardFileLocation: SL203031242RBCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: GBCaseWorker: Cleanup ProgramSiteCaseType: 120.666961669922Longitude: 35.2468107292544Latitude: NotreportedLeadAgencyCaseNumber: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SL203031242GlobalId: 05/25/2018StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedFacilityStatus: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: TANK FARMRDAddress: UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TANK FARMROADName: CPS-SLIC: 688 ft. Site 19 of 19 in cluster J 0.130 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW WDSTANKFARMRD N/A J114 CPS-SLICUNOCAL - PIPELINE-TANK FARM ROAD S103843254 TC6926581.2s Page 401 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, suchasComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional boardorderTreatToWater: NotreportedPOTW: NotreportedReclamation: 0BaselineFlow: 0DesignFlow: NotreportedSecondaryWasteType: NotreportedSecondaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedWaste2: NotreportedWasteType2: NotreportedPrimaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedSICCode2: 0SICCode: PrivateAgencyType: UNOCAL - PIPELINE-TANK FARM ROAD (Continued) S103843254 JON W. TREDER (WES)Owner Name: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SUITEAMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: WTREDER@ELECTRICRAFTINC.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-544-8224ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SUITEAContactAddress: JON W. TREDER (WES)Contact Name: CAC003057228EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SUITEAHandlerAddress: ELECTRICRAFT, INC.Handler Name: 20200224DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 697 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster M 0.132 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SW 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SUITE A CAC003057228 M115 RCRA NonGen / NLRELECTRICRAFT, INC.1026050401 TC6926581.2s Page 402 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20200306HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: JON W. TREDER (WES)Operator Name: OtherOwnerType: ELECTRICRAFT, INC. (Continued)1026050401 TC6926581.2s Page 403 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: WIND ELECTRIC POWERGENERATIONNAICSDescription: 221115NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ELECTRICRAFT, INC.Handler Name: 20200224ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8224Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SUITEAOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JON W. TREDER (WES)Owner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-8224Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 200 SUBURBAN ROAD SUITEAOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JON W. TREDER (WES)Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: ELECTRICRAFT, INC. (Continued)1026050401 TC6926581.2s Page 404 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: CON WAY FREIGHTUSMOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: CON WAY FREIGHTINCOwnerName: ANN ARBOR, MI48105MailingCity,State,Zip: 2211 OLD EARHARTDRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: MGR OF ENVCOMPLIANCEContactTitle: SEXTEN.JEFF@CON-WAY.COMContactEmail: 734-757-1341ContactFax: 734-757-1657ContactTelephone: ANN ARBOR, MI48105ContactCity,State,Zip: 2211 OLD EARHARTDRContactAddress: JEFF ASEXTENContactName: CAR000216465EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 219 A TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: CON WAY FREIGHTUSMHandlerName: 20131205DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 746 ft. Site 1 of 13 in cluster P 0.141 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 219 A TANK FARM RD CAR000216465 P116 RCRA NonGen / NLRCONWAYFREIGHTUSM 1014387983 TC6926581.2s Page 405 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20060531DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CON WAY FREIGHTUSMOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: METHYL ETHYLKETONEWasteDescription: D035WasteCode: CORROSIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D002WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20140130HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: CON WAY FREIGHT USM (Continued) 1014387983 TC6926581.2s Page 406 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CON WAY FREIGHTUSMHandlerName: 20131205ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CON WAY FREIGHTUSMHandlerName: 20110118ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 408-871-1868Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN JOSE, CA95113Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 28 N 1STSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20060531DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: UNIONPROPERTIESOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19831107DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CON WAY FREIGHTUSMOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 734-757-1657Owner/Operator Telephone: ANN ARBOR, MI48105Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2201 OLD EARHARTRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19831107DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CON WAY FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: CON WAY FREIGHT USM (Continued)1014387983 TC6926581.2s Page 407 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL FREIGHT TRUCKING, LONG-DISTANCE, LESS THANTRUCKLOADNAICSDescription: 484122NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: CON WAY FREIGHT USM (Continued) 1014387983 NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 170Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: PFAS: 754 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster Q 0.143 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SE N/A Q117 PFASWELL02 S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 408 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: 11ClPF3OUDSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/17/2020Date: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 409 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/9/2021Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 410 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/9/2021Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/9/2021Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 411 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/9/2021Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 412 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.8Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/23/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 99Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 413 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/23/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.8Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 9/23/2019Date: NG/LUnits: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 414 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 160Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000766GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 TC6926581.2s Page 415 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 116 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000766GeoTrackerURL: 120.65199Longitude: 35.23948Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000766-011LocationID: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520823 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017433RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0012040FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4330 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: MCCARTHYSTEELName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 771 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster O 0.146 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4330 OLD SANTA FE RD N/A O118 CUPAListingsMCCARTHYSTEEL S118397417 NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006839RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002291FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219B TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIXPLANTName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 777 ft. Site 2 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 219B TANK FARM RD N/A P119 CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPOREADYMIXPLANT S126222733 TC6926581.2s Page 416 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66783Longitude: 35.24607Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011720RecordId: SLO CITY - AGT ANNUALPERMITProgramElement: 1251ProgramElementCode: FA0002291FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219B TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIXPLANTName: 120.66783Longitude: 35.24607Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002291RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0002291FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219B TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIXPLANTName: 120.66783Longitude: 35.24607Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001763RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 5-10ProgramElement: 0763ProgramElementCode: FA0002291FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219B TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIXPLANTName: 120.66783Longitude: 35.24607Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIX PLANT (Continued) S126222733 PR0007594RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005149FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 2Address: ALL AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION REBUILD - 225 TANK FARM RDBName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 777 ft. Site 3 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW HAZNET225TANKFARMRDSTEC1 N/A P120 CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPOPAINTINGCO S117845168 TC6926581.2s Page 417 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/30/2015 22:15:30CreationDate: 20151102ShipmentDate: CAL000403802GenEPAID: 2015Year: Additional Info: 1.7655Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAL000403802Gepaid: 2015Year: PO BOX30MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8052861322Telephone: RACHELRODRIGUEZContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 225 TANK FARM RD STEC1Address: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTINGCOName: HAZNET: 120.66636Longitude: 35.24618Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007593RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005149FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 2Address: ALL AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION REBUILD - 225 TANK FARM RDBName: 120.66636Longitude: 35.24618Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007592RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005149FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 2Address: ALL AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION REBUILD - 225 TANK FARM RDBName: 120.66636Longitude: 35.24618Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTING CO (Continued) S117845168 TC6926581.2s Page 418 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 000223945MWIManifestID: 20150203ReceiptDate: 3/23/2015 22:15:13CreationDate: 20150202ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 1.32QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: F003RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTransName: CAD983649880TransEPAID: 014421185JJKManifestID: 20150706ReceiptDate: 9/16/2015 22:15:10CreationDate: 20150623ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.1815QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: F003RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: STERICYCLE SPECIALTY WASTE SOLUTIONSINCTransName: MNS000110924TransEPAID: 014865420JJKManifestID: 20151111ReceiptDate: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTING CO (Continued)S117845168 TC6926581.2s Page 419 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 225 TANK FARM RD STEC1FacilityAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTINGCOFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2015-01-15 16:05:16.99000IssuedEPAIDDate: Painting and Wall CoveringContractorsNAICSDescription: 23521NAICSCode: 2015-01-15 16:05:17.000CreateDate: CAL000403802EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 225 TANK FARM RD STEC1ContactAddress: RACHELRODRIGUEZContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: C1-C2OwnerAddress2: 225 TANK FARMROADOwnerAddress: JOSEPHRODRIGUEZOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: PO BOX30MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 08/18/2020LastActDate: 01/15/2015CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000403802EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 225 TANK FARM RD STEC1Address: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTINGCOName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 80WasteQuantity: 0.264QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: F003RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTING CO (Continued) S117845168 TC6926581.2s Page 420 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: All ok. Annual inspection - employee training and inspections being conducted.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-13-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Annual inspection - all ok. HM Bus. Plan has been submitted on line.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-13-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Water Pollution Prevention Plan Received a copy of the latest update/certification for the AGTStormEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-10-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via CERS database. Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-06-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10154947CERSID: 150644SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219B TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIXPLANTName: CERS: Aboveground PetroleumStorageCERSDescription: 10154947CERSID: 150644SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219B TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIXPLANTName: CERS TANKS: 777 ft. Site 4 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CERS219BTANKFARMRD N/A P121 CERSTANKSSANLUISOBISPOREADYMIXPLANT S121746423 TC6926581.2s Page 421 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Business Plan spill prevention and c Good employee training program on SWPPP and HazardousMaterialsEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-10-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: at least annually. Annual inspection, labeling around tanks is good. TrainingconductedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-07-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: HMBP has been updated for CY 2018 - no violations noted.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-07-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: upgrade the plant equipment and lay SPCC Plan is complete and being followed. Facility hasrecentlyEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-26-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Annual inspection, good training program.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-13-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: layout of plant. Much of the equi Facility to undergo upgrades and significant changes toexistingEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-06-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIX PLANT (Continued) S121746423 TC6926581.2s Page 422 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: CERS electronic database. No Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated and susbmittedviaEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-22-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: secondary containment. SPCC has Diesel fuel tank is properly labeled, protected by bollards, andinEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-22-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: HMBP has been submitted on line via CERS.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-07-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: SPCC has been updated to reflect new operational changes.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-07-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: HMBP has been updated and submitted via CERS database for CY 2019.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-26-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Annual inspection, SPCC in good order.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-13-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIX PLANT (Continued) S121746423 TC6926581.2s Page 423 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEntityTitle: CalPortlandCompanyEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: EnvironmentalManagerEntityTitle: MurryWilsonEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MurryWilsonEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 345-3545,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CALPORTLANDCONSTRUCTIONEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 922-3551,Affiliation Phone: 93456AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SantaMariaAffiliationCity: PO Box1280AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CALPORTLANDCONSTRUCTIONEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIX PLANT (Continued)S121746423 TC6926581.2s Page 424 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93456AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SantaMariaAffiliationCity: PO Box1280AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93456AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SantaMariaAffiliationCity: PO Box1280AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MurryWilsonEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 345-3400,Affiliation Phone: 93456AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SantaMariaAffiliationCity: PO Box1280AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CALPORTLANDCONSTRUCTIONEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIX PLANT (Continued) S121746423 219 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: ENVIRONMENTALMANAGERContactName: CAD982496713EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICEGARAGEHandlerName: 19900514DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: HWTS CERS HAZNET CUPA Listings ECHO FINDS 777 ft.CHMIRSSite5of13inclusterP 0.147 mi.HAULERS Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 CPS-SLICSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW LUST219TANKFARMRD CAD982496713 P122 RCRA-SQGSANLUISSTRUCKSERVICEGARAGE 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 425 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: NOTREQUIREDOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: BOBSANTOSOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406MailingCity,State,Zip: P O BOX941MailingAddress: 5StateDistrict: CAStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: OtherLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-543-4134ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued)1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 426 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICEGARAGEHandlerName: 19900514ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: BOBSANTOSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20020627HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued)1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 427 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFunding: NotreportedInterimAction: LUSTPilotProgram: Monitoring: NotreportedRemedialAction: NotreportedRemedialPlan: Pollution Char: NotreportedPrelimAssess: 6/1/02Workplan: NotreportedConfirmLeak: CMWStaffInitials: LocalAgencyLeadAgency: 40000LocalAgency: NotreportedCrossStreet: NotreportedContact: 219 TANK FARMRDRPAddress: ROBERTSANTOSResponsibleParty: NotreportedEnforcementType: NotreportedCloseDate: NotreportedEnforceDate: Review Date: 6/1/02StopDate: Enter Date: 5/7/02DiscoveredDate: 11/01/2002ReleaseDate: OMHowDiscovered: OtherMeansHowStopped: UNKLeakCause: UNKLeakSource: NotreportedAbatementMethod: NotreportedQuantity: GasolineSubstance: SCaseType: NotreportedLocalCaseNum: 3455CaseNumber: Preliminary site assessment workplansubmittedStatus: T0607985770GlobalID: San LuisObispoFacilityCounty: Central CoastRegionRegionalBoard: 3Region: LUST REG 3: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 428 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation contamination at levels up to 4,100 micrograms per liter (g/L) TPH as facility release. Results of the groundwater sampling indicate likely associated with the adjacent Unocal crude oil pipeline detected during soil sampling. A portion of the TPH detected is to 8,890 mg/kg TPH as diesel, and 165 mg/kg TPH as gasoline were detected at 6 micrograms per kilogram (g/kg). In addition, levels up TPH) as mineral spirits. Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) was also 6,510 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) total petroleum hydrocarbons confirmed a release of mineral spirits, detected at levels up to with truck washing and maintenance. Results of the soil sampling subsurface clarifier, seepage pit, and sand trap system associated contaminated soil and groundwater discovered during removal of 34PPB IN MW-3. Areport documents the presence of petroleum 4 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS INSTALLED 1/31/03. MTBE DETECTEDATSiteHistory: Distillates MTBE / TBA / Other Fuel Oxygenates, Stoddard solvent / MineralSpriitsPotentialContaminantsofConcern: Aquifer used for drinking watersupplyPotentialMediaAffected: RegionalBoardFileLocation: S312RBCaseNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYLocalAgency: TTCaseWorker: Cleanup ProgramSiteCaseType: 120.6666Longitude: 35.2466Latitude: NotreportedLeadAgencyCaseNumber: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: T0607985770GlobalId: 02/24/2015StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedFacilityStatus: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS TRUCK SERVICEGARAGEName: CPS-SLIC: NotreportedSummary: NotreportedAssignedName: 0DistanceFromWell: NotreportedWellName: NotreportedWaterSystem: NotreportedOperator: NotreportedSuspended: NotreportedUSTCleanupFundID: NotreportedPriority: NotreportedBeneficial: NotreportedBasinPlan: NotreportedOrgName: 1MtbeFuel: 0MtbeConcentratn: NotreportedGrndWtrQualifier: NotreportedSoilQualifier: 0 / 0Lat/Long: NTMTBETested: Max MTBE Data: NotreportedMaxMTBESoil: NotreportedMaxMTBEGrndWtr: MTBE Class: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 429 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: NotreportedOESTime: NotreportedOESDate: 07/12/2016OESnotification: 16-4219OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 A TANK FARMRDAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: NotreportedBusinessTypes: NotreportedRegulatoryStatusLastChanged: NotreportedAcceptingTiresFromPublic: NotreportedCurrentHaulerStatus: ActiveCurrentStatus: 805) 347-4793MailingPhone: SantaBarbaraMailingCounty: 93456MailingZip: CAMailingState: SantaMariaMailingCity: P. O. Box6007MailingAddress: TerriWahlbergContactPerson: twahlberg@smtire.comBusinessEmailAddress: 805) 543-4780FacilityPhone: 1719249FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC.Name: HAULERS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: is not contributingTPH to groundwater. concentrations of TPH are lower than upgradient, indicating the site of mineral spirits in soil and groundwater and downgradient yards of polluted soil; since cleanup there have been no detections party removed all underground facilities and approximately 370 cubic gasoline, and 34 g/L (MTBE). Between 2002 and 2003, the responsible SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 430 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click Here: 110002831703RegistryID: FINDS: Release is contained and no into containment for disposal at a later date. trailer floor. Absorbent placed & release swept approximately 1 gallon of Fungicide to the punctured 2.5 gallon container releasing RP states: Unloading tractor trailer, forkliftDescription: NotreportedComments: NoFatals: NoInjuries: NoEvacs: No#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#3 Pipeline: No#2 Pipeline: No#1 Pipeline: NotreportedNumberofFatalities: NotreportedNumberofInjuries: NotreportedEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: 1QuantityReleased: FungicideSubstance: NotreportedEDate: N/ASiteType: YesContained: NotreportedAmount: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentAdminAgency: 07/12/2016IncidentDate: ERTSAgency: 2016Year: 800Date/Time: NotreportedOther: Gal(s)Measure: CHEMICALType: NotreportedOther: NotreportedMeasure: NotreportedType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: ResponsiblePartyCleanupBy: OtherSpillSite: N/AWaterway: NoWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 431 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0002292FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: RUSH TRUCKCENTERName: 120.66783Longitude: 35.24629Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001766RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0002292FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: RUSH TRUCKCENTERName: 120.66783Longitude: 35.24629Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006840RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002292FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: RUSH TRUCKCENTERName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICEGARAGEName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002831703DFRURL: 110002831703RegistryID: 1000122546Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 432 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000216465Gepaid: 2011Year: 0.145Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000216465Gepaid: 2011Year: 0.015Tons: Disposal Method: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000216465Gepaid: 2015Year: 0.229Tons: Disposal Method: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000216465Gepaid: 2015Year: 0.077Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteDisposalMethod: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000216465Gepaid: 2015Year: 0.027Tons: Disposal Method: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000216465Gepaid: 2015Year: 2211 OLD EARHART RD STE100MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 7347571657Telephone: JEFFSEXTENContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 219 TANK FARM RD # AAddress: CON WAY FRIEGHTUSMName: HAZNET: 120.66783Longitude: 35.24629Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002292RecordId: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 433 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: RHO-CHEMLLCTSDFAltName: CAD008364432TSDFAltEPAID: 21ST CENTURY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF NEVADALLCTransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 000124336MWIManifestID: 20110913ReceiptDate: 7/19/2012 22:00:14CreationDate: 20110830ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 450WasteQuantity: 0.225QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D002RCRACode: 141 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusinorganicsWasteCodeDescription: RHO-CHEMLLCTSDFAltName: CAD008364432TSDFAltEPAID: 21ST CENTURY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF NEVADALLCTransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 000124336MWIManifestID: 20110913ReceiptDate: 7/19/2012 22:00:14CreationDate: 20110830ShipmentDate: CAR000216465GenEPAID: 2011Year: Additional Info: 0.225Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 141 - Off-specification, aged or surplusinorganicsCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000216465Gepaid: 2011Year: 0.224Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 434 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 290WasteQuantity: 0.145QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: RHO-CHEMLLCTSDFAltName: CAD008364432TSDFAltEPAID: 21ST CENTURY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF NEVADALLCTransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 000124336MWIManifestID: 20110913ReceiptDate: 7/19/2012 22:00:14CreationDate: 20110830ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 10WasteQuantity: 0.005QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: RHO-CHEMLLCTSDFAltName: CAD008364432TSDFAltEPAID: 21ST CENTURY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF NEVADALLCTransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 000124336MWIManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20110830ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 72WasteQuantity: 0.036QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued)1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 435 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20150310ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 154WasteQuantity: 0.077QuantityTons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteMethCode: D001RCRACode: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 015291057JJKManifestID: 20151202ReceiptDate: 1/21/2016 22:16:16CreationDate: 20151123ShipmentDate: CAR000216465GenEPAID: 2015Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 376WasteQuantity: 0.188QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: RHO-CHEMLLCTSDFAltName: CAD008364432TSDFAltEPAID: 21ST CENTURY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF NEVADALLCTransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 000124336MWIManifestID: 20110913ReceiptDate: 7/19/2012 22:00:14CreationDate: 20110830ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued)1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 436 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 014423982JJKManifestID: 20150317ReceiptDate: 5/19/2015 22:15:15CreationDate: 20150310ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 458WasteQuantity: 0.229QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 014423982JJKManifestID: 20150317ReceiptDate: 5/19/2015 22:15:15CreationDate: 20150310ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.015QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: D001RCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: PSC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF POMONALPTrans2Name: CAD983649880Trans2EPAID: RHO CHEMLLCTransName: CAD008364432TransEPAID: 014423982JJKManifestID: 20150317ReceiptDate: 5/19/2015 22:15:15CreationDate: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued)1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 437 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2025 E FINANCIALWAYAffiliationAddress: DIRECTORNA ENVIRONMENTALAFFAIRSEntityTitle: JAYGRADYEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: GLENDORAAffiliationCity: 2025 E FINANCIALWAYAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MurryWilsonEntityName: PublicContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: BOBKOBEREntityName: PublicContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: GLENDORAAffiliationCity: 2025 E FINANCIALWAYAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DesireaHaggardEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110039204893CERSID: 457391SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: CALPORTLAND CO SAN LUISOBISPOName: CERS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: D001AdditionalCode4: D005AdditionalCode3: D006AdditionalCode2: D007AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 54WasteQuantity: 0.027QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: D035RCRACode: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued)1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 438 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ANN ARBOR, MI48105City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 2211 OLD EARHART ROAD, SUITE100ContactAddress: JEFFSEXTENContactName: ANN ARBOR, MI481050000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 2211 OLD EARHART RD STE100OwnerAddress: XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.Owner Name: ANN ARBOR, MI481050000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 2211 OLD EARHART RD STE100MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 10/19/2020LastActDate: 02/09/2011CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAR000216465EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017509City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 219 TANK FARM RD # AAddress: XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT INC. - USMName: HWTS: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBSIPOAffiliationCity: 805 AEROVISTA PLACE, SUITE101AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: THEA TRYON - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Entity Name: Regional BoardCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Cleanup ProgramSiteCERSDescription: T0607985770CERSID: 209806SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS TRUCK SERVICEGARAGEName: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: GLENDORAAffiliationCity: SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE (Continued) 1000122546 TC6926581.2s Page 439 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: JOSEPHRODRIGUEZOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: HOLDGRAFER & ASSOCIATESOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: HUCKLEBERRYLANEMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: 2015BiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: OFFICEMANAGERContactTitle: RACHEL@SLOPAINTINGCOMPANY.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-286-1322ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: TANK FARM ROAD (C1)Contact Address: RACHELRODRIGUEZContactName: CAL000403802EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 225 TANK FARM ROAD (C1)Handler Address: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTINGCOMPANYHandlerName: 20160224DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 777 ft. Site 6 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 225 TANK FARM ROAD (C1)CAL000403802 P123 RCRA-SQGSANLUISOBISPOPAINTINGCOMPANY 1019327141 TC6926581.2s Page 440 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWasteDescription: F003WasteCode: REACTIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D003WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2015Year: Biennial: List of Years NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20161104HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTING COMPANY (Continued) 1019327141 TC6926581.2s Page 441 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: PAINTING AND WALL COVERINGCONTRACTORSNAICSDescription: 23832NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTINGCOMPANYHandlerName: 20160224ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-2682Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 245 TANK FARM ROAD UNITAOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20070101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: HOLDGRAFER & ASSOCIATESOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20140201DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: JOSEPHRODRIGUEZOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTING COMPANY (Continued) 1019327141 TC6926581.2s Page 442 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: NotreportedOwnerCountry: NotreportedOwnerZipCode: NotreportedOwnerState: NotreportedOwnerMailAddress: NotreportedOwnerPhone: NotreportedOperatorPhone: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedMailingAddressZipCode: NotreportedMailingAddressState: NotreportedMailingAddressCity: NotreportedMailingAddress: NotreportedFax: NotreportedPhone: NotreportedBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: NotreportedCERSID: 6000TotalGallons: UNION ASPHALT, INCOwner: San LuisObispoCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,City/Zip: 219 TANKFARMAddress: NotreportedName: AST: 777 ft. Site 7 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA WSW 219 TANK FARM N/A P124 AST A100344754 93456MailingAddressZipCode: CAMailingAddressState: SantaMariaMailingAddressCity: PO Box1280MailingAddress: NotreportedFax: 805-345-3545Phone: CalPortlandCompanyBusinessName: FA0002291FacilityID: 10154947CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: CalportlandConstructionOwner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 219B TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIXPLANTName: AST: 777 ft. Site 8 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 219B TANK FARM RD N/A P125 ASTSANLUISOBISPOREADYMIXPLANT A100424136 TC6926581.2s Page 443 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEPAID: UnitedStatesPropertyOwnerCountry: 93456PropertyOwnerZipCode: CAPropertyOwnerStat : SantaMariaPropertyOwnerCity: PO Box1280PropertyOwnerMailingAddress: 805-345-3400PropertyOwnerPhone: CalportlandConstructionPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 93456OwnerZipCode: CAOwnerState: PO Box1280OwnerMailAddress: 805-922-3551OwnerPhone: 805-345-3545OperatorPhone: CalportlandConstructionOperatorName: SAN LUIS OBISPO READY MIX PLANT (Continued) A100424136 000NumberofPits: 57LongitudeSeconds: 17LongitudeMinutes: 36LatitudeSeconds: 53LatitudeMinute: 120LongitudeDegree: 34LatitudeDegree: 0NumberofPlants: 0NumberofShops: 2OperationClass: 19800131StatusDate: Full-TimePermanentStatus: CALPORTLANDCONSTRUCTIONCompany: GAREY ROCKPLANTEntityName: 0403031MineID: 000000SicCode(s): 000000SicCode(s): 000000SicCode(s): 000000SicCode(s): 000000SicCode(s): 144200SicCode(s): US MINES: 777 ft. Site 9 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 219 TANK FARM RD. # B N/A P126 USMINESCALPORTLANDCONSTRUCTION 1014595835 107676SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.-USMName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 777 ft. Site 10 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CUPAListings219TANKFARMRD N/A P127 CERS HAZWASTEXPOLOGISTICSFREIGHT, INC.-USM S118754756 TC6926581.2s Page 444 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationAddress: Environmental ComplianceManagerEntityTitle: JeffSextenEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 48105AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: MIAffiliationState: AnnArborAffiliationCity: 2211 Old Earhart Road, Suite100AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JEFFSEXTENEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 48105AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: MIAffiliationState: AnnArborAffiliationCity: 2211 Old Earhart Road, Suite100AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: XPO Logistics Inc.Entity Name: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AmandaGalbaviEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10449508CERSID: XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.-USM (Continued)S118754756 TC6926581.2s Page 445 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66707Longitude: 35.24677Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017846RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0012412FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 219 TANK FARMRDAddress: XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.-USMName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 805) 541-4581,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.-USMEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 734) 757-1657,Affiliation Phone: 48105AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: MIAffiliationState: AnnArborAffiliationCity: 2211 Old Earhart Road, Suite100AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.Entity Name: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.-USM (Continued) S118754756 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020203RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0014753FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 211 TANK FARMRDAddress: GOT YOU COVER’DINCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 777 ft. Site 11 of 13 in cluster P 0.147 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 129 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 211 TANK FARM RD N/A P128 CUPAListingsGOTYOUCOVER’D INC S127016728 TC6926581.2s Page 446 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: GOT YOU COVER’D INC (Continued) S127016728 LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONSName: 120.66715Longitude: 35.25130Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007412RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005078FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 254 GRANADA DR100Address: LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONSName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: NotreportedEPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 80021OwnerZipCode: COOwnerState: 1025 EldoradoBoulevardOwnerMailAddress: 7208880676OwnerPhone: 7208880676OperatorPhone: HAZARDOUS MATERIALSCOMPLIANCEOperatorName: 93401MailingAddressZipCode: CAMailingAddressState: SAN LUISOBISPOMailingAddressCity: 254 GRANADA DR100MailingAddress: NotreportedFax: 7208880676Phone: LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONSBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: 10437169CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: Level 3CommunicationsOwner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 254 GRANADA DR100Address: LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONSName: AST: 809 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster R 0.153 mi.HWTS Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW CUPAListings254GRANADADR N/A R129 ASTLEVEL3COMMUNICATION S110743797 TC6926581.2s Page 447 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ADAMS SERVICESINCTransName: CAR000189431TransEPAID: 013673234JJKManifestID: 20150326ReceiptDate: 6/24/2015 22:15:49CreationDate: 20150319ShipmentDate: CAC002807724GenEPAID: 2015Year: Additional Info: 0.417Tons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidDisposalMethod: 241 - Tank bottomwasteCAWasteCode: CAT080013352TSDEPAID: CAC002807724Gepaid: 2015Year: 1025 ELDORADOBLVDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 7208881000Telephone: GURDIKIANContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017366City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 254 GRANADADRAddress: LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONName: HAZNET: 120.66715Longitude: 35.25130Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007971RecordId: SLO CITY - AGT ANNUALPERMITProgramElement: 1251ProgramElementCode: FA0005078FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 254 GRANADA DR100Address: LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONSName: 120.66715Longitude: 35.25130Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007411RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005078FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 254 GRANADA DR100Address: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATION (Continued) S110743797 TC6926581.2s Page 448 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BROOMFIELD, CO800218254City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 1025 ELDORADOBLVDContactAddress: GURDIKIANContactName: BROOMFIELD, CO800218254OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 1025 ELDORADOBLVDOwnerAddress: LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONOwnerName: BROOMFIELD, CO80021MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 1025 ELDORADOBLVDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 06/19/2015LastActDate: 03/19/2015CreateDate: 06/18/2015InactiveDate: CAC002807724EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017366City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 254 GRANADADRAddress: LEVEL 3COMMUNICATIONName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.417QuantityTons: Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect H039 - Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse IncludingAcidMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 241 - Tank bottom waste 251 Still bottoms with halogenatedorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: DEMENNO/KERDOONTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATION (Continued) S110743797 NONPL: NotreportedAcres: HistoricalSiteTypeDetailed: HistoricalSiteType: NotreportedSiteCode: 01/15/1992StatusDate: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 40070003FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMROADAddress: COUNTY FARMSUPPLYName: ENVIROSTOR: 828 ft.CERSSite2of4inclusterL 0.157 mi.HIST CORTESE Relative: Higher Actual: 164 ft. 1/8-1/4 CorteseSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 East LUST675TANKFARMRD N/A L130 ENVIROSTORS.L.O COUNTY FARM SUPPLY S100873201 TC6926581.2s Page 449 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFLocalAgency: 103RBCaseNumber: NotreportedCaseWorker: 06/06/1990StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: 120.644821Longitude: 35.246542Latitude: T0607900004GlobalId: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607900004GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: S.L.O COUNTY FARMSUPPLYName: LUST: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: FACILITY IDENTIFIED PHONE BOOK AND DUN ANDBRADSTREETComments: 02/01/1983CompletedDate: DiscoveryCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 40070003AliasName: HWTS IdentificationCodeAliasType: CAX000222026AliasName: AlternateNameAliasType: SAN LUIS OBISPO FARM SUPPLYCOAliasName: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialDescription: NONESPECIFIEDConfirmedCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6449Longitude: 35.24675Latitude: NotreportedFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: NotreportedSpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: CleanupSacramentoDivisionBranch: Referred - NotAssignedSupervisor: NotreportedProgramManager: NONESPECIFIEDLeadAgency: NONESPECIFIEDRegulatoryAgencies: S.L.O COUNTY FARM SUPPLY (Continued)S100873201 TC6926581.2s Page 450 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PipingLeakSource: spreading or land farming) Excavate and Treat - remove contaminated soil and treat (includesAbatementMethod: NotreportedQuantity: GasolineSubstance: OCaseType: NotreportedLocalCaseNum: 103CaseNumber: CaseClosedStatus: T0607900004GlobalID: San LuisObispoFacilityCounty: Central CoastRegionRegionalBoard: 3Region: LUST REG 3: 06/06/1990StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607900004GlobalId: 05/16/1989StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607900004GlobalId: LUST: LeakStoppedAction: 05/16/1989Date: OtherActionType: T0607900004GlobalId: LeakReportedAction: 05/24/1989Date: OtherActionType: T0607900004GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 05/16/1989Date: OtherActionType: T0607900004GlobalId: LUST: 8057817560PhoneNumber: NotreportedEmail: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: NotreportedAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFOrganizationName: UST CASEWORKERContactName: Local AgencyCaseworkerContactType: T0607900004GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedSiteHistory: GasolinePotentialContaminantsofConcern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: State RecordsCenterFileLocation: S.L.O COUNTY FARM SUPPLY (Continued) S100873201 TC6926581.2s Page 451 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: S.L.O COUNTY FARMSUPPLYName: CORTESE: NotreportedSummary: NotreportedAssignedName: 0DistanceFromWell: NotreportedWellName: NotreportedWaterSystem: NotreportedOperator: NotreportedSuspended: NotreportedUSTCleanupFundID: 0Priority: NotreportedBeneficial: 10.24BasinPlan: NotreportedOrgName: 1MtbeFuel: 0MtbeConcentratn: NotreportedGrndWtrQualifier: NotreportedSoilQualifier: 35.2546089 / -120.6463162Lat/Long: NTMTBETested: Max MTBE Data: NotreportedMaxMTBESoil: NotreportedMaxMTBEGrndWtr: MTBE Class: RFunding: 0InterimAction: USTPilotProgram: Monitoring: NotreportedRemedialAction: NotreportedRemedialPlan: Pollution Char: NotreportedPrelimAssess: NotreportedWorkplan: NotreportedConfirmLeak: FJDStaffInitials: RegionalBoardLeadAgency: San Luis Obispo, San Luis ObispoCountyLocalAgency: BROADSTCrossStreet: NotreportedContact: 796 FOOTHILLBOULEVARDRPAddress: UNKNOWNResponsibleParty: NoneTakenEnforcementType: 6/6/90CloseDate: 1/1/65EnforceDate: 07/24/1989ReviewDate: 5/16/89StopDate: 07/24/1989EnterDate: 5/16/89DiscoveredDate: 05/24/1989ReleaseDate: TankClosureHowDiscovered: NotreportedHowStopped: UNKLeakCause: S.L.O COUNTY FARM SUPPLY (Continued)S100873201 TC6926581.2s Page 452 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8057817560,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: UST CASE WORKER - SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFEntityName: Local AgencyCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank CleanupSiteCERSDescription: T0607900004CERSID: 237375SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: S.L.O COUNTY FARMSUPPLYName: CERS: 103RegId: LTNKARegBy: 40FacilityCountyCode: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 TANKFARMedr_fadd1: S.L.O COUNTY FARMSUPPLYedr_fname: HIST CORTESE: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607900004GlobalID: S.L.O COUNTY FARM SUPPLY (Continued) S100873201 TC6926581.2s Page 453 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 35.24757Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007140RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0004674FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: QUINN RENTALSERVICESName: 120.64487Longitude: 35.24757Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001769RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0004674FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: QUINN RENTALSERVICESName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NotreportedLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedTankUsedfor: NotreportedTankCapacity: NotreportedYearInstalled: NotreportedContainerNum: NotreportedTankNum: NotreportedTotalTanks: NotreportedOwnerCity,St,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress: NotreportedOwnerName: NotreportedTelephone: NotreportedContactName: NotreportedOtherType: NotreportedFacilityType: NotreportedFacilityID: NotreportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002BA3D.pdfURL: 0002BA3DFileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMROADAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARMSUName: HIST UST: 828 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster L 0.157 mi.HWTS Relative: Higher Actual: 164 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93406 East CUPAListings675TANKFARMROAD N/A L131 HISTUSTSANLUISOBISPOCOUNTYFARMSU S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 454 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2007Year: 0.15Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2008Year: 0.35445Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2009Year: 0.10425Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 133 - Aqueous solution with total organic residues 10 percent ormoreCAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2009Year: 4.17Tons: Without Treatment) H135 - Discharge To Sewer/Potw Or Npdes(With Prior Storage--WithOrDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2009Year: 3.953Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2009Year: PO BOX226789MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 5624634703Telephone: MARKURSICContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: QUINN RENTALSERVICESName: HAZNET: 120.64487Longitude: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued) S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 455 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004476419JJKManifestID: 20090902ReceiptDate: 10/12/2009 18:30:08CreationDate: 20090901ShipmentDate: CAL000293700GenEPAID: 2009Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.05QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NVD980895338TSDFAltEPAID: 21ST CENTRURYEMITransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: PHILIP TRANSPORATION & REMEDIATIONINCTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 24341146ManifestID: 20060307ReceiptDate: 7/5/2006 12:04:15CreationDate: 20060222ShipmentDate: CAL000293700GenEPAID: 2006Year: Additional Info: 0.05Tons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: NVD980895338TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2006Year: 0.68805Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000293700Gepaid: 2007Year: 0.15Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued) S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 456 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004476434JJKManifestID: 20090828ReceiptDate: 10/13/2009 18:30:21CreationDate: 20090825ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.10425QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 133 - Aqueous solution with 10% or more total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004476434JJKManifestID: 20090828ReceiptDate: 10/13/2009 18:30:21CreationDate: 20090825ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 1000WasteQuantity: 4.17QuantityTons: Without Treatment) H135 - Discharge To Sewer/Potw Or Npdes(With Prior Storage--WithOrMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued)S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 457 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GQuantityUnit: 900WasteQuantity: 3.753QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004001962JJKManifestID: 20090331ReceiptDate: 4/21/2009 18:30:21CreationDate: 20090326ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 003995571JJKManifestID: 20090618ReceiptDate: 7/31/2009 18:30:37CreationDate: 20090616ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 50WasteQuantity: 0.025QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued)S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 458 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004001891JJKManifestID: 20090327ReceiptDate: 4/29/2009 18:30:21CreationDate: 20090320ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 85WasteQuantity: 0.35445QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D018RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004001891JJKManifestID: 20090327ReceiptDate: 4/29/2009 18:30:21CreationDate: 20090320ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued)S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 459 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 300WasteQuantity: 0.15QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 002580822JJKManifestID: 20070724ReceiptDate: 11/5/2007 18:30:14CreationDate: 20070719ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 165WasteQuantity: 0.68805QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D018RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 002580822JJKManifestID: 20070724ReceiptDate: 11/5/2007 18:30:14CreationDate: 20070719ShipmentDate: CAL000293700GenEPAID: 2007Year: Additional Info: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued) S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 460 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation QUINN RENTALSERVICESFacilityName: 2010-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 2005-04-29 09:15:13.78000IssuedEPAIDDate: All Other HeavyConstructionNAICSDescription: 23499NAICSCode: 2006-11-27 18:30:15.000CreateDate: CAL000293700EPAID: NAICS: LOS ANGELES, CA900220489City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: PO BOX226789ContactAddress: MARKURSICContactName: LOS ANGELES, CA900220489OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: PO BOX226789OwnerAddress: QUINNGRPOwnerName: LOS ANGELES, CA900220489MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: PO BOX226789MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 11/22/2010LastActDate: 04/29/2005CreateDate: 06/30/2010InactiveDate: CAL000293700EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: QUINN RENTALSERVICESName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 300WasteQuantity: 0.15QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004007865JJKManifestID: 20081222ReceiptDate: 2/4/2009 18:30:20CreationDate: 20081218ShipmentDate: CAL000293700GenEPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued)S113137053 TC6926581.2s Page 461 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 675 TANK FARMRDFacilityAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SU (Continued) S113137053 StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: PREMIUMTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00002000TankCapacity: 1980YearInstalled: 3ContainerNum: 003TankNum: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: UNLEADEDTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00001000TankCapacity: 1980YearInstalled: 2ContainerNum: 002TankNum: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: DIESELTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00001000TankCapacity: 1980YearInstalled: 1ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0003TotalTanks: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406OwnerCity,St,Zip: 675 TANK FARMROADOwnerAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARMSUOwnerName: 8055433751Telephone: JAMES W. BRABECKContactName: BUSINESSVEHICLESOtherType: OtherFacilityType: 00000064556FacilityID: STATERegion: NotreportedURL: NotreportedFileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 675 TANK FARMRDAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARMSUName: HIST UST: 828 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster L 0.157 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 164 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 East 675 TANK FARM RD N/A L132 HISTUSTSANLUISOBISPOCOUNTYFARMSU U001585087 TC6926581.2s Page 462 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66624Longitude: 35.25210Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011475RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0007453FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDRAddress: FZIOMEDINCName: 120.66624Longitude: 35.25210Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011474RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0007453FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDRAddress: FZIOMEDINCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 831 ft. Site 1 of 11 in cluster S 0.157 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 231 BONETTI DR N/A S133 CUPAListingsFZIOMEDINC S110744144 NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: WSTORMS@FZIOMED.COMContactEmail: 805-549-7171ContactFax: 805-549-7135ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDRContactAddress: WILLIAM STORMS / FACSUPVRContactName: CAL000289872EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDRHandlerAddress: FZIO MEDINCHandlerName: 20051230DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 831 ft. Site 2 of 11 in cluster S 0.157 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 231 BONETTI DR CAL000289872 S134 RCRA NonGen / NLRFZIOMEDINC 1024810467 TC6926581.2s Page 463 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: WILLIAM STORMS / FACSUPVROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: FZIOMEDINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: FZIO MED INC (Continued)1024810467 TC6926581.2s Page 464 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: SURGICAL APPLIANCE AND SUPPLIESMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 339113NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FZIO MEDINCHandlerName: 20051230ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-546-0610Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: FZIOMEDINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-549-7135Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: WILLIAM STORMS / FACSUPVROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: FZIO MED INC (Continued)1024810467 TC6926581.2s Page 465 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: nitrogen has been labeled as HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 with minor changes. Room withliquidEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-29-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentViolationDivision: upgrade done same day, violation corrected. Returned to compliance on 10/01/2014. Facility map not complete -Violation Notes: required content. Failure to complete and electronically submit a site map withallViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 10-01-2014ViolationDate: FZIOMEDINCSiteName: 548958SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentViolationDivision: submitted along with other elements of HMBP for Agency review and a Returned to compliance on 10/01/2014. Facility map to be completedandViolationNotes: required content. Failure to complete and electronically submit a site map withallViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 10-01-2014ViolationDate: FZIOMEDINCSiteName: 548958SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10439200CERSID: 548958SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDRAddress: FZIOMEDINCName: CERS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439200CERSID: 548958SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 231 BONETTIDRAddress: FZIOMEDINCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 831 ft. Site 3 of 11 in cluster S 0.157 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW CERS231BONETTIDR N/A S135 CERS HAZWASTEFZIOMEDINC S124441218 TC6926581.2s Page 466 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: to be completed by August 30, User Name and Password received. Completion of Business Plan onlineEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-15-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: evaluation of storage quantitie Electronic submittal of facillity hazmat Business Plan is pendinganEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-05-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: coompleted same day. HMBP map was not yet completed. Data entry into EZ SubmitPortalEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 10-01-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: item and submit entire plan el HMBP is completed except for Facility Map. Manager to completethisEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 10-01-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: plan within two weeks of today’s Facility to complete annual update of hazardous materialsbusinessEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-29-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically to E Z Submit Portal. Hazardous Materials Business Plan to be updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-19-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: FZIOMED INC (Continued)S124441218 TC6926581.2s Page 467 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FZIOMEDINCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 549-7117,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 231BONETTIAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FZIOMEDINCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: StephanieCorteseEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.666240Longitude: 35.252100Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10439200ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: FZIOMEDINCFacilityName: 548958SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-01-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: FZIOMED INC (Continued)S124441218 TC6926581.2s Page 468 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 231 BONETTIDRAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: StephanieCorteseEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 549-7212,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: RONHAYNESEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: VPOperationsEntityTitle: StephanieCorteseEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 231 BONETTIDRAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: FZIOMED INC (Continued)S124441218 TC6926581.2s Page 469 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.64833Longitude: 35.23943Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002288RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0002288FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4345 OLD SANTA FE RD46Address: HANGAR46Name: 120.64833Longitude: 35.23943Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017805RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1 WS <27 GAL/MO, SELF REPORTER)Program Element: 1125ProgramElementCode: FA0002288FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4345 OLD SANTA FE RD46Address: HANGAR46Name: 120.64833Longitude: 35.23943Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006836RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002288FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4345 OLD SANTA FE RD46Address: HANGAR46Name: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 864 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster T 0.164 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4345 OLD SANTA FE RD 46 N/A T136 CUPAListingsHANGAR46 S117845063 SANTA FERDContactAddress: LARRY ADANOContactName: CAD982504391EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: ENTEGRISINCHandlerName: 20200303DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 869 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster U 0.165 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 160 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE FINDS4175SANTAFERD CAD982504391 U137 RCRA-SQGENTEGRISINC 1000333426 TC6926581.2s Page 470 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: ENTEGRISINCOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: ENTEGRIS, INC.Owner Name: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: SANTA FERDMailingAddress: 2StateDistrict: CAStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: EHSSPECIALISTContactTitle: LARRY.DANO@ENTEGRIS.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-786-2228ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: ENTEGRIS INC (Continued)1000333426 TC6926581.2s Page 471 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TOM.BASS@ENTEGRIS.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9299Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20190627DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ENTEGRIS, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9299Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ENTEGRISINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: REACTIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D003WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2019Year: Biennial: List of Years NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20200303HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: ENTEGRIS INC (Continued)1000333426 TC6926581.2s Page 472 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9299Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ENTEGRISINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: TOM.BASS@ENTEGRIS.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9299Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20190627DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ENTEGRIS, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9299Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 A SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: SAES PUREGASOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: TOM.BASS@ENTEGRIS.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9299Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20190627DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ENTEGRIS, INC.Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9299Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ENTEGRISINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: ENTEGRIS INC (Continued)1000333426 TC6926581.2s Page 473 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENTEGRISINCHandlerName: 20200303ReceiveDate: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ENTEGRIS, INC.Handler Name: 20190710ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAES PUREGASHandlerName: 19960628ReceiveDate: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ENTEGRIS, INC.Handler Name: 20200302ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: ENTEGRIS INC (Continued)1000333426 TC6926581.2s Page 474 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002835255RegistryID: FINDS: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PURPOSE MACHINERYMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 333999NAICSCode: ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 332999NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ENTEGRIS INC (Continued)1000333426 10437781CERSID: 567447SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDAddress: ENTEGRISName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 869 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster U 0.165 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 160 ft. 1/8-1/4 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE CUPAListings4175SANTAFERD N/A U138 CERS HAZWASTEENTEGRIS S110743691 TC6926581.2s Page 475 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4175 SANTA FERDAddress: ENTEGRISName: 120.64568Longitude: 35.24225Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019102RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 11+Program Element: 0764ProgramElementCode: FA0013606FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDAddress: ENTEGRISName: 120.64568Longitude: 35.24225Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002286RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0002286FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDAddress: SAES PURE GAS, INCName: 120.64568Longitude: 35.24225Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001756RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 11+ HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0728ProgramElementCode: FA0002286FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDAddress: SAES PURE GAS, INCName: 120.64568Longitude: 35.24225Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006834RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002286FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDAddress: SAES PURE GAS, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: ENTEGRIS (Continued)S110743691 TC6926581.2s Page 476 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-24-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-21-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-21-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-29-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10437781CERSID: 567447SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4175 SANTA FERDAddress: ENTEGRISName: CERS: 120.64568Longitude: 35.24225Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019103RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0013606FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: ENTEGRIS (Continued)S110743691 TC6926581.2s Page 477 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-14-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-03-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-03-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: LCHANDLER@CO.SLO.CA.US. PRE-REGISTRATION FORMS TO LINNEA CHANDLER PREFERABLY VIA EMAIL AT RESPECTIVE PROCESSES. SUBMIT THE RESULTS ALONG WITH THE CALARP CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF HYDROGEN AND AMMONIA IN POUNDSTHEIREvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-14-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-25-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-25-2017EvalDate: ENTEGRIS (Continued)S110743691 TC6926581.2s Page 478 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: BrettSteyaertEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: TomBassEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.646610Longitude: 35.242160Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10437781ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: ENTEGRISFacilityName: 567447SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-24-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: EXTREMELY WELL RUNFACILITYEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-29-2013EvalDate: ENTEGRIS (Continued)S110743691 TC6926581.2s Page 479 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 4175 Santa FeRoadAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Entegris, Inc.Entity Name: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 541-9299,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4175 SANTA FEROADAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ENTEGRISEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4175 SANTA FERDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SAES PURE GAS, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: Director of PlantOperationsEntityTitle: BrettSteyaertEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 4175 Santa FeRoadAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: TomBassEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 786-2206,Affiliation Phone: ENTEGRIS (Continued)S110743691 TC6926581.2s Page 480 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 541-9299,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: ENTEGRIS (Continued)S110743691 NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: GARYSPARKSOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: AEROCADEMYFOUNDATIONOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 965 AIRPORTDRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: JB@AEROCADEMY.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-544-2441ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HNGR52ContactAddress: GARYSPARKSContactName: CAL000454772EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HNGR52HandlerAddress: AEROCADEMYHandlerName: 20200527DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 881 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster T 0.167 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HNGR 52 CAL000454772 T139 RCRA NonGen / NLRAEROCADEMY 1026490244 TC6926581.2s Page 481 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: AEROCADEMYFOUNDATIONOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-2441Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HNGR52Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: GARYSPARKSOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20200904HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: AEROCADEMY (Continued)1026490244 TC6926581.2s Page 482 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: OTHER AIRPORTOPERATIONSNAICSDescription: 488119NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: AEROCADEMYHandlerName: 20200527ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-2441Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HNGR52Owner/Operator Address: AEROCADEMY (Continued)1026490244 4349 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: HELIPROINCName: HWTS: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017806RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1 WS <27 GAL/MO, SELF REPORTER)Program Element: 1125ProgramElementCode: FA0012362FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RDDAddress: HELIPROName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 881 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster T 0.167 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE HWTS4349OLDSANTAFERD N/A T140 CUPAListingsHELIPROINC S124700903 TC6926581.2s Page 483 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedMailingName: 12/29/2018LastActDate: 09/28/2018CreateDate: 12/28/2018InactiveDate: CAC002982554EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: HELIPROINCName: 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDFacilityAddress: HELIPROINCFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2020-11-03 15:01:17.74700IssuedEPAIDDate: Reupholstery and FurnitureRepairNAICSDescription: 811420NAICSCode: 2020-11-03 15:01:17.750CreateDate: CAL000458003EPAID: 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDFacilityAddress: HELIPROINCFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2020-11-03 15:01:17.74700IssuedEPAIDDate: Reupholster and FurnitureRepairNAICSDescription: 811420NAICSCode: 2020-11-03 15:01:17.750CreateDate: CAL000458003EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDContactAddress: MARCELLOMOROContactName: ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA91748OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 1608 NOGALES STD01OwnerAddress: AMERISTAR AVIATIONINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 11/03/2020LastActDate: 11/03/2020CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000458003EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: HELIPRO INC (Continued)S124700903 TC6926581.2s Page 484 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BONITA, CA91902City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 354 SURREYDRContactAddress: MARCELLOMOROContactName: SAN DIEGO, CA92154OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 7060 CURRANSTOwnerAddress: AMERISTARAVIATIONOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 945 B AIRPORTDRMailingAddress: HELIPRO INC (Continued)S124700903 120.64844Longitude: 35.23878Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017472RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0012079FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SUNWESTAVIATIONName: 120.64844Longitude: 35.23878Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017471RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0012079FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SUNWESTAVIATIONName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 881 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster T 0.167 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD N/A T141 CUPAListingsSUNWESTAVIATION S118397423 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HANGER37HandlerAddress: CUESTA AVIATIONINCHandlerName: 20101007DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 881 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster T 0.167 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HANGER 37 CAL000357860 T142 RCRA NonGen / NLRCUESTAAVIATIONINC 1025868254 TC6926581.2s Page 485 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: BRETT HOOVER/PRESOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: CUESTA AVIATIONINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HANGER37MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: CUESTAAVIATION@YAHOO.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-305-5096ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HANGER37ContactAddress: BRETT HOOVER/PRESContactName: CAL000357860EPAID: CUESTA AVIATION INC (Continued)1025868254 TC6926581.2s Page 486 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedRecognizedTraderExporter: NotreportedRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CUESTA AVIATIONINCHandlerName: 20101007ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-305-5096Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HANGER37Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: BRETT HOOVER/PRESOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-305-5096Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD HANGER #37Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CUESTA AVIATIONINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190913HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: CUESTA AVIATION INC (Continued)1025868254 TC6926581.2s Page 487 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENTSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56299NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NotreportedSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NotreportedSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: CUESTA AVIATION INC (Continued)1025868254 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017807RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1 WS <27 GAL/MO, SELF REPORTER)Program Element: 1125ProgramElementCode: FA0012363FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD #37Address: CUESTAAVIATIONName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 881 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster T 0.167 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD #37 N/A T143 CUPAListingsCUESTAAVIATION S118754755 MARCELLO@HELITRAINING.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-543-2713ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDContactAddress: MARCELLOMOROContactName: CAL000458003EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: HELIPROINCHandlerName: 20201103DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 881 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster T 0.167 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SSE 4349 OLD SANTA FE RD CAL000458003 T144 RCRA NonGen / NLRHELIPROINC 1026493195 TC6926581.2s Page 488 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: MARCELLOMOROOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: AMERISTAR AVIATIONINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: HELIPRO INC (Continued)1026493195 TC6926581.2s Page 489 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: HELIPROINCHandlerName: 20201103ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-2713Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4349 OLD SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: MARCELLOMOROOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-2713Owner/Operator Telephone: ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA91748Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1608 NOGALES STD01Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: AMERISTAR AVIATIONINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20201106HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: HELIPRO INC (Continued)1026493195 TC6926581.2s Page 490 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: REUPHOLSTERY AND FURNITUREREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811420NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: HELIPRO INC (Continued)1026493195 YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARMSSUPPLYOperatorName: NotreportedOwnerType: NotreportedOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-0111MailingCity,State,Zip: PO BOX111MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: JHELBERG@FARMSUPPLYCOMPANY.COMContactEmail: 805-543-0613ContactFax: 805-543-3751ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7508ContactCity,State,Zip: 224 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: JAKEHELBERGContactName: CAL000298618EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7508HandlerCity,State,Zip: 224 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SUPPLYCOHandlerName: 20210402DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 898 ft. Site 12 of 13 in cluster P 0.170 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 224 TANK FARM RD CAL000298618 P145 RCRA NonGen / NLRSANLUISOBISPOCOUNTYFARMSUPPLYCO 1024812199 TC6926581.2s Page 491 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-3751Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-0111Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX111Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARMSSUPPLYOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20210405HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO (Continued)1024812199 TC6926581.2s Page 492 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FARM SUPPLIESWHOLESALERSNAICSDescription: 42291NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SUPPLYCOHandlerName: 20210402ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SUPPLYCOHandlerName: 20050920ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-3751Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-0111Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX111Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARMSSUPPLYOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-3751Owner/Operator Telephone: PASO ROBLES, CA93446Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2450 RAMADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: NOELRYANOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO (Continued) 1024812199 TC6926581.2s Page 493 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: NURSERY, GARDEN CENTER, AND FARM SUPPLYSTORESNAICSDescription: 44422NAICSCode: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO (Continued) 1024812199 560273SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 224 TANK FARMRDAddress: FARM SUPPLYCOMPANYName: CERS: 120.66724Longitude: 35.24685Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0014800RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0006907FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 224 TANK FARMRDAddress: FARM SUPPLYCOMPANYName: 120.66724Longitude: 35.24685Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010684RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0006907FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 224 TANK FARMRDAddress: FARM SUPPLYCOMPANYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438432CERSID: 560273SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 224 TANK FARMRDAddress: FARM SUPPLYCOMPANYName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 898 ft. Site 13 of 13 in cluster P 0.170 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CUPAListings224TANKFARMRD N/A P146 CERS HAZWASTEFARMSUPPLYCOMPANY S110744057 TC6926581.2s Page 494 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 35.246856Latitude: Unknown,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10438432ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: FARM SUPPLYCOMPANYFacilityName: 560273SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-20-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-03-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: An updated business plan has been submitted on line and is current.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-02-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: HMBP has been updated for CY 2019.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-06-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-27-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10438432CERSID: FARM SUPPLY COMPANY (Continued) S110744057 TC6926581.2s Page 495 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PO Box111AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JakeHelbergEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Cloud Consulting- RayCloudEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-3751,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Cara M. CryeEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Farm SupplyCompanyEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: President/CEOEntityTitle: Cara M. CryeEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.667216Longitude: FARM SUPPLY COMPANY (Continued)S110744057 TC6926581.2s Page 496 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 543-3751,Affiliation Phone: 93406-0111AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: PO Box111AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Farm SupplyCompanyEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 543-3751,Affiliation Phone: 93406-0111AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: PO Box111AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Farm SupplyCompanyEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93406-0111AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: P.O. Box111AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93406-0111AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: FARM SUPPLY COMPANY (Continued) S110744057 WilliamMartinezProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 0.5Acres: EvaluationSiteTypeDetailed: EvaluationSiteType: 102326SiteCode: 07/11/2018StatusDate: No ActionRequiredStatus: 60002454FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 227GRANADAAddress: JBLSCIENTIFICName: ENVIROSTOR: 904 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster R 0.171 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW 227 GRANADA N/A R147 ENVIROSTORJBLSCIENTIFIC S120052856 TC6926581.2s Page 497 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: Approved by U.S. EPAComments: 06/09/2017CompletedDate: PA/SI SiteScreeningCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60002454AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102326AliasName: EPA IdentificationNumberAliasType: CAN000903696AliasName: OTH, SOILPotentialDescription: Toluene Xylenes Tetrachloroethylene (PCE TPH-MOTOR OIL 30026-NO 30027-NOChloroformConfirmedCOC: Trichloroethylene (TCE Chloroform Toluene Xylenes Tetrachloroethylene (PCE TPH-MOTOR OIL 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCAPotentialCOC: LABORATORIES- BIOLOGICAL, LABORATORIES- CHEMICALPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6677Longitude: 35.25114Latitude: EPAGrantFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: EPA - PASISpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: KevinShaddySupervisor: JBL SCIENTIFIC (Continued)S120052856 W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 919 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster V 0.174 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 141 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SE N/A V148 PFASWELL01 S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 498 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PFUNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/24/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 499 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/24/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: HFPA-DAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/24/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 500 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/24/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: 9ClPF3ONSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 501 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/24/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: 11ClPF3OUDSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 502 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 10/28/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 92Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/24/2020Date: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 503 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 10/28/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 74Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 504 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 10/28/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2.2Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 10/28/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 210Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 TC6926581.2s Page 505 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 116 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000768GeoTrackerURL: 120.651034Longitude: 35.239786Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 10/28/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000768-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000768GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520825 NotreportedCERSID: 12000TotalGallons: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTOwner: San LuisObispoCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,City/Zip: 250BONNETTIAddress: NotreportedName: AST: 929 ft. Site 4 of 11 in cluster S 0.176 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA NW 250 BONNETTI N/A S149 AST A100344831 TC6926581.2s Page 506 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: NotreportedOwnerCountry: NotreportedOwnerZipCode: NotreportedOwnerState: NotreportedOwnerMailAddress: NotreportedOwnerPhone: NotreportedOperatorPhone: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedMailingAddressZipCode: NotreportedMailingAddressState: NotreportedMailingAddressCity: NotreportedMailingAddress: NotreportedFax: NotreportedPhone: NotreportedBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: Continued)A100344831 44-004464BoardOfEqualization: 1Number: 54012CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.Name: 3NumberOfTanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTankUse: 01-14-93ActiveDate: 12000Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-023-054012-000001SWRCBTankId: 1OwnerTankId: 02-29-88CreatedDate: 07-07-93ActionDate: 01-14-93ReferralDate: 44-004464BoardOfEqualization: 1Number: 54012CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.Name: SWEEPS UST: 929 ft. Site 5 of 11 in cluster S 0.176 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW CUPAListings250BONNETTIDR N/A S150 SWEEPSUSTVIKINGFREIGHTSYSTEM, INC.S106934106 TC6926581.2s Page 507 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007704RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 5-10ProgramElement: 0763ProgramElementCode: FA0005187FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: 120.66490Longitude: 35.25252Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007707RecordId: SLO CITY - RENEWAL - UST ANNUAL PERMITFEEProgramElement: 0351ProgramElementCode: FA0005187FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: NotreportedNumberOfTanks: WASTEOILContent: WSTG: OILTankUse: 01-14-93ActiveDate: 1000Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-023-054012-000003SWRCBTankId: 3OwnerTankId: 02-29-88CreatedDate: 07-07-93ActionDate: 01-14-93ReferralDate: 44-004464BoardOfEqualization: 1Number: 54012CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.Name: NotreportedNumberOfTanks: NEW MOTOROIContent: PSTG: OILTankUse: 01-14-93ActiveDate: 2000Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-023-054012-000002SWRCBTankId: 2OwnerTankId: 02-29-88CreatedDate: 07-07-93ActionDate: 01-14-93ReferralDate: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. (Continued)S106934106 TC6926581.2s Page 508 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66490Longitude: 35.25252Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010433RecordId: SLO CITY - AGT ANNUALPERMITProgramElement: 1251ProgramElementCode: FA0005187FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: 120.66490Longitude: 35.25252Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007705RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005187FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: 120.66490Longitude: 35.25252Latitude: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. (Continued) S106934106 NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: EMERGENCY RESPONSESPECIALISTContactTitle: KEITH.WINTER@FEDEX.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 501-860-7904ContactTelephone: BENTON, AR72015ContactCity,State,Zip: ALCOARDContactAddress: KEITHWINTERContactName: CAD982042061EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 250 BONETTIDRHandlerAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTSLOHandlerName: 20201203DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: ECHO 929 ft.FINDSSite6of11inclusterS 0.176 mi.CA FID UST Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 HISTUSTSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 NW UST250BONETTIDR CAD982042061 S151 RCRA-SQGFEDEXFREIGHTSLO 1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 509 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20201211HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwnerName: BENTON, AR72015MailingCity,State,Zip: ALCOARDMailingAddress: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 510 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation METHYL ETHYLKETONEWasteDescription: D035WasteCode: CRESOLWasteDescription: D026WasteCode: O-CRESOLWasteDescription: D023WasteCode: CHLOROFORMWasteDescription: D022WasteCode: BENZENEWasteDescription: D018WasteCode: 2,4-D (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID)Waste Description: D016WasteCode: SILVERWasteDescription: D011WasteCode: SELENIUMWasteDescription: D010WasteCode: MERCURYWasteDescription: D009WasteCode: LEADWasteDescription: D008WasteCode: CHROMIUMWasteDescription: D007WasteCode: CADMIUMWasteDescription: D006WasteCode: BARIUMWasteDescription: D005WasteCode: ARSENICWasteDescription: D004WasteCode: REACTIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D003WasteCode: CORROSIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D002WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 511 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ETHENE, TETRACHLORO- (OR) TETRACHLOROETHYLENEWasteDescription: U210WasteCode: 1,3-BENZENEDIOL (OR) RESORCINOLWasteDescription: U201WasteCode: 1,3,5-TRIOXANE, 2,4,6-TRIMETHYL- (OR) PARALDEHYDEWasteDescription: U182WasteCode: NAPHTHALENEWasteDescription: U165WasteCode: METHACRYLATE (I,T) 2-PROPENOIC ACID, 2-METHYL-, METHYL ESTER (I,T) (OR) METHYLWasteDescription: U162WasteCode: PENTANOL, 4-METHYL- 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (I) (OR) METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (I) (OR)Waste Description: U161WasteCode: 2-BUTANONE, PEROXIDE (R,T) (OR) METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE (R,T)Waste Description: U160WasteCode: 2-BUTANONE (I,T) (OR) METHYL ETHYL KETONE (MEK) (I,T)Waste Description: U159WasteCode: 4,4’-METHYLENEBIS[2-CHLORO- 4,4’-METHYLENEBIS(2-CHLOROANILINE) (OR) BENZENAMINE,Waste Description: U158WasteCode: METHANOL (I) (OR) METHYL ALCOHOL (I)Waste Description: U154WasteCode: HYDRAZINE (R,T)Waste Description: U133WasteCode: 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE (I) (OR) FURFURAL (I)Waste Description: U125WasteCode: FORMALDEHYDEWasteDescription: U122WasteCode: METHANE, DICHLORO- (OR) METHYLENECHLORIDEWasteDescription: U080WasteCode: METHANE, DIBROMO- (OR) METHYLENEBROMIDEWasteDescription: U068WasteCode: 2-PROPANONE (I) (OR) ACETONE (I)Waste Description: U002WasteCode: TRICHLORETHYLENEWasteDescription: D040WasteCode: TETRACHLOROETHYLENEWasteDescription: D039WasteCode: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 512 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: HARRISON, AR72601Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2200 FORWARDDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20091228DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: ESTERS (OR) DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID 2,4-D 2,4-D, SALTS & ESTERS (OR) ACETIC ACID, (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXY)-, SALTSWasteDescription: U240WasteCode: BENZENE, DIMETHYL- (I,T) (OR) XYLENE (I)Waste Description: U239WasteCode: ETHENE, TRICHLORO- (OR) TRICHLOROETHYLENEWasteDescription: U228WasteCode: BENZENE, 1,3-DIISOCYANATOMETHYL- (R,T) (OR) TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (R,T)Waste Description: U223WasteCode: BENZENE, METHYL- (OR) TOLUENEWasteDescription: U220WasteCode: THIOUREAWasteDescription: U219WasteCode: FURAN, TETRAHYDRO-(I) (OR) TETRAHYDROFURAN (I)Waste Description: U213WasteCode: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 513 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HARRISON, AR72601Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2200 FORWARDDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: VIKING FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 800-603-3828Owner/Operator Telephone: HARRISON, AR72601Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2200 FORWARDDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 800-603-3828Owner/Operator Telephone: HARRISON, AR72601Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2200 FORWARDDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 800-874-4723Owner/Operator Telephone: HARRISON, AR72601Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2200 FORWARDDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20060906DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 514 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20090519ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEMINCHandlerName: 19870928ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEMINCHandlerName: 19960901ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20091228DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20060906DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: FEDEX FREIGHTINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 800-603-3828Owner/Operator Telephone: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 515 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GENERAL FREIGHT TRUCKING, LONG-DISTANCE, LESS THANTRUCKLOADNAICSDescription: 484122NAICSCode: GENERAL FREIGHTTRUCKINGNAICSDescription: 4841NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FEDEX FREIGHTSLOHandlerName: 20201203ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FEDEX FREIGHTSLOHandlerName: 20170403ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FEDEX FREIGHT INCSLOHandlerName: 20111011ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FEDEX FREIGHTINCHandlerName: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 516 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: UST: NotreportedFormerCitation: NotreportedRequestAgency: NotreportedDateResponseReceived: NotreportedDateofRequest: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: NotreportedActualReturntoComplianceDate: NotreportedEvaluationResponsibleSub-Organization: R9EvaluationResponsiblePersonIdentifier: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluationTypeDescription: NoFoundViolation: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluationResponsibleAgency: 19940901EvaluationDate: Evaluation Action Summary: NotreportedFinalAmount: NotreportedFinalCount: NotreportedPaidAmount: NotreportedFinalMonetaryAmount: NotreportedProposedAmount: NotreportedSEPTypeDescription: NotreportedSEPType: NotreportedSEPDefaultedDate: NotreportedSEPActualDate: NotreportedSEPScheduledCompletionDate: NotreportedSEPExpenditureAmount: NotreportedSEPSequenceNumber: NotreportedEnforcementResponsibleSub-Organization: NotreportedEnforcementResponsiblePerson: NotreportedEnforcementType: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Lead Agency: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Respondent Name: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Sequence Number: NotreportedDispositionStatusDescription: NotreportedDispositionStatus: NotreportedDispositionStatusDate: NotreportedAppealResolutionDate: NotreportedAppealInitiatedDate: NotreportedCorrectiveActionComponent: NotreportedEnforcementAttorney: NotreportedEnforcementDocketNumber: NotreportedEnforcementResponsibleAgency: NotreportedDateofEnforcementAction: NotreportedEnforcementIdentifier: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: NotreportedViolationResponsibleAgency: NotreportedReturntoComplianceQualifier: NotreportedActualReturntoComplianceDate: NotreportedDateViolationwasDetermined: NotreportedViolationShortDescription: NotreportedAgencyWhichDeterminedViolation: NoFoundViolation: Facility Has Received Notices of Violation: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 517 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WASTETankUsedfor: 00001500TankCapacity: 1984YearInstalled: 4ContainerNum: 004TankNum: VisualLeakDetection: 10ContainerConstructionThickness: WASTEOILTypeofFuel: WASTETankUsedfor: 00001000TankCapacity: 1984YearInstalled: 5ContainerNum: 003TankNum: VisualLeakDetection: 1/4ContainerConstructionThickness: NotreportedTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00002000TankCapacity: 1984YearInstalled: 2ContainerNum: 002TankNum: Visual, StockInventorLeakDetection: 1/4ContainerConstructionThickness: DIESELTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00012000TankCapacity: 1984YearInstalled: 1ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0004TotalTanks: SANTA CLARA, CA95050OwnerCity,St,Zip: 3405 VICTORSTREETOwnerAddress: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.Owner Name: 8055411750Telephone: JOEBARRIOSContactName: TERMINALOtherType: OtherFacilityType: 00000054012FacilityID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002BB34.pdfURL: 0002BB34FileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250BONNETTEAddress: VIKING FREIGHT SYSTEMINCName: HIST UST: 120.665574967861Longitude: 35.2525890346541Latitude: NotreportedCERSID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFPermittingAgency: 600125FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 518 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTSLOName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002786245DFRURL: 110002786245RegistryID: 1000257062Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002786245RegistryID: FINDS: ActiveStatus: NotreportedComments: NotreportedEPAID: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedDUNsNumber: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO93401MailingCity,St,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 250BONNETTEMailingAddress: NotreportedMailTo: 8055411750FacilityPhone: NotreportedSICCode: NotreportedCorteseCode: 00054012RegulatedID: UTNKARegulatedBy: 40001798FacilityID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: VisualLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: NotreportedTypeofFuel: FEDEX FREIGHT SLO (Continued)1000257062 TC6926581.2s Page 519 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007442RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005090FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 223 GRANADA DR A/BAddress: VPA AUTOREPAIRName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007441RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005090FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 223 GRANADA DR A/BAddress: VPA AUTOREPAIRName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007443RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005090FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 223 GRANADA DR A/BAddress: VPA AUTOREPAIRName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 933 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster R 0.177 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW 223 GRANADA DR A/B N/A R152 CUPAListingsVPAAUTOREPAIR S117845159 Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10437784CERSID: 548947SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 939 ft. Site 7 of 11 in cluster S 0.178 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 NW CERSTANKS250BONNETTIDR N/A S153 CERS HAZWASTEFEDEXFREIGHTWEST S124441211 TC6926581.2s Page 520 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-26-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: violations noted. Spill kit located Received a copy of the June 3, 2010 SPCC Re-Certification. NoEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-02-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: available on site. SPCC has been completed, submitted for review and approval, andisEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-26-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Portal. HMBP has been updated and submitted electronically to EZSubmitEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-07-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10437784CERSID: 548947SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: CERS: Aboveground PetroleumStorageCERSDescription: 10437784CERSID: 548947SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 250 BONNETTIDRAddress: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTName: CERS TANKS: FEDEX FREIGHT WEST (Continued)S124441211 TC6926581.2s Page 521 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08-04-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-13-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via CERS web based p Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-30-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Received updated hazmat business plan - all ok.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-02-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-13-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Diesel AG Emergency Shut Off s Above Ground Storage Tank is properly managed with records oftestingEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-07-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Annual inspection, all ok.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-04-2014EvalDate: FEDEX FREIGHT WEST (Continued)S124441211 TC6926581.2s Page 522 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 408) 654-3112,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 250 BONNETTIDRAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: MANAGER-ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESEntityTitle: CHONGLEEEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 95054AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SANTACLARAAffiliationCity: 3425 VICTOR ST.Affiliation Address: NotreportedEntityTitle: LEE, CHONGEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: regarding the above ground diesel Continue efforts to provide spill prevention/response toemployeesEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-30-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Business Plan last updated 2/21/2013.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: FEDEX FREIGHT WEST (Continued)S124441211 TC6926581.2s Page 523 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 408) 654-3112,Affiliation Phone: 95054AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SANTACLARAAffiliationCity: 3425 VICTOR ST.Affiliation Address: NotreportedEntityTitle: FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.Entity Name: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FEDEX FREIGHTWESTEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 800) 845-4647,Affiliation Phone: 95054AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SANTACLARAAffiliationCity: 3425VICTORAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FEDEX FREIGHT WEST, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CHONGLEEEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: FEDEX FREIGHT WEST (Continued)S124441211 TC6926581.2s Page 524 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Tap It BrewingCompanyOperatorName: 10/16/2018StatusDate: TerminatedStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: 340NEC000908WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 CLARIONCOURTAddress: TAP IT BREWINGCOMPANYName: NPDES: 120.64594Longitude: 35.24411Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019455RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0013970FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 CLARIONCTAddress: SANTA MARIA BREWING COMPANY, INC.Name: 120.64595Longitude: 35.24410Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0016644RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0008543FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 CLARIONCTAddress: TAP IT BREWINGCOName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 954 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster W 0.181 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/8-1/4 CIWQSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE NPDES675CLARIONCT N/A W154 CUPAListingsSANTAMARIABREWINGCOMPANY, INC.S117349017 TC6926581.2s Page 525 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 675 ClarionCourtDischargeAddress: Tap It BrewingCompanyDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 10/05/2015EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340NEC000908WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 463903RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 675 ClarionCourtOperatorAddress: SANTA MARIA BREWING COMPANY, INC. (Continued)S117349017 TC6926581.2s Page 526 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 675 ClarionCourtOperatorAddress: Tap It BrewingCompanyOperatorName: raikens@tapitbrewing.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-545-7702ContactPhone: brewmasterContactTitle: RyanAikensContact: SqFtPlaceSizeUnit: 10239PlaceSize: 10/05/2015StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 10/05/2015ProcessedDate: 10/01/2015ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340NEC000908WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 463903RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: SANTA MARIA BREWING COMPANY, INC. (Continued)S117349017 TC6926581.2s Page 527 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 2082SIC/NAICS: Industrial - MaltBeveragesPlace/Project Type: 675 Clarion Court, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: Tap It BrewingCompanyAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 675 CLARIONCOURTAddress: TAP IT BREWINGCOMPANYName: CIWQS: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 2082-MaltBeveragesPrimarySic: 23-SEP-16CertificationDate: BrewmasterCertifierTitle: RyanAikensCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: 714-342-3846EmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: raikens@tapitbrewing.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-545-7702OperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: RyanAikensOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: SANTA MARIA BREWING COMPANY, INC. (Continued)S117349017 TC6926581.2s Page 528 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.64595Longitude: 35.2441Latitude: 1Violationswithin5years: 1EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: 10/16/2018TerminationDate: 10/05/2015EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340NEC000908WDID: SANTA MARIA BREWING COMPANY, INC. (Continued) S117349017 San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: USERNAMES ARE ALWAYS EMAIL ADDRESSES. USERNAME AND PASSWORD FIRST AND WAIT FOR AN ELECTRONIC RESPONSE. CERS.CALEPA.CA.GOV. FOR EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG, YOU MUST APPLY FOR A BUSINESS PLAN ELECTRONICALLY; EITHER AT WWW.EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG OR Returned to compliance on 06/25/2020. SUBMIT THE HAZARDOUSMATERIALSViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 02-05-2020ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10825048CERSID: 557071SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 675 CLARIONCTAddress: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOName: CERS: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019869RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0014396FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406City,State,Zip: 675 CLARIONCTAddress: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 954 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster W 0.181 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 ESE CERS675CLARIONCT N/A W155 CUPAListingsLIQUIDGRAVITYBREWINGCO S126222781 TC6926581.2s Page 529 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN. EMPLOYEE TRAINING PROGRAM THAT INCLUDES CURRENT HAZARD COMMUNICATION Returned to compliance on 09/13/2019. DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENTANViolationNotes: release of a hazardous material. program in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened Failure to establish and electronically submit an adequatetrainingViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 05-21-2019ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: progress. Returned to compliance on 06/25/2020. Business plan updateinViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 06-22-2020ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: TRAINING AND HAVE DOCUMENTATION OF TRAINING AT THE REINSPECTION. Returned to compliance on 09/13/2019. CONDUCT REQUIREDEMPLOYEEViolationNotes: records for a minimum of three years. hazardous material or failure to document and maintain training safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a Failure to provide initial and annual training to all employeesinViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25505(a)(4) HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 05-21-2019ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: ELECTRONICALLY Returned to compliance on 09/13/2019. SUBMIT AN ANNOTATED SITEMAPViolationNotes: required content. Failure to complete and electronically submit a site map withallViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 05-21-2019ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWING CO (Continued) S126222781 TC6926581.2s Page 530 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation AT 805-781-5544. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FEES OF $600. PAYMENT MAY BE MADE OVER THE PHONE Returned to compliance on 08/12/2019. IMMEDIATELY PAYYOURViolationNotes: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - GeneralViolationDescription: Section(s) Multiple HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 05-21-2019ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: USERNAMES ARE ALWAYS EMAIL ADDRESSES. USERNAME AND PASSWORD FIRST AND WAIT FOR AN ELECTRONIC RESPONSE. CERS.CALEPA.CA.GOV. FOR EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG, YOU MUST APPLY FOR A BUSINESS PLAN ELECTRONICALLY; EITHER AT WWW.EZSUBMITSLOGOV.ORG OR Returned to compliance on 09/13/2019. SUBMIT THE HAZARDOUSMATERIALSViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 05-21-2019ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: 55-GAL LIQUID, 500LBS SOLID, 200 CUFT GAS) ELECTRONICALLY, Returned to compliance on 09/13/2019. SUBMIT THE CHEMICALINVENTORYViolationNotes: at or above reportable quantities. inventory information for all reportable hazardous materials on site Failure to complete and electronically submit hazardousmaterialViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 05-21-2019ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: PLAN ELECTRONICALLY Returned to compliance on 09/13/2019. SUBMIT THE EMERGENCYRESPONSEViolationNotes: hazardous material. response plan and procedures for a release or threatened release of a Failure to establish and electronically submit an adequateemergencyViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 05-21-2019ViolationDate: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWINGCOSiteName: 557071SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWING CO (Continued) S126222781 TC6926581.2s Page 531 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: VERIFICATION OF TRAINING WILL BE COMPLETED AT THE NEXT INSPECTION. COMMUNICATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE IS INCUMBENT UPON THE EMPLOYER. 2019, HAS BEEN CANCELLED. TRAINING OF EMPLOYEES ON HAZARD THEREFORE, THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 25, VIOLATIONS FROM THE MAY 2019 CUPA INSPECTION ARE IN COMPLIANCE; WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SUBMITTING EMPLOYEE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION, THEEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-13-2019EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 06-22-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-02-2020EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: STORAGE CONTAINER. SEPARATE INCOMPATIBLE CLEANING COMPOUNDS (ACID AWAY FROM BASE) INEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 05-21-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: LIQUID GRAVITYBREWINGEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 02-05-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWING CO (Continued) S126222781 TC6926581.2s Page 532 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: PO BOX15840AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: PO Box15840AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MonicaDugganEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MonicaDugganEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 467-4677,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Liquid Gravity BrewingCompanyEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: Sales & OperationsManagerEntityTitle: MonicaDugganEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWING CO (Continued)S126222781 TC6926581.2s Page 533 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SANTA MARIA BREWINGCOEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 467-4677,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: PO Box15840AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: GOUGH BREWINGINCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: LIQUID GRAVITY BREWING CO (Continued) S126222781 NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 93401OwnerZipCode: CAOwnerState: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDOwnerMailAddress: 8055435928OwnerPhone: 8055430875OperatorPhone: San Luis GarbageCompanyOperatorName: 93401MailingAddressZipCode: CAMailingAddressState: SAN LUISOBISPOMailingAddressCity: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDMailingAddress: 8055430620Fax: 8055435928Phone: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: 10436548CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYOwner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: AST: 956 ft.CIWQSSite2of7inclusterQ 0.181 mi.NPDES Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 EMISANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SE HAULERS4388OLDSANTAFEROAD N/A Q156 ASTSANLUISGARBAGECOMPANY S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 534 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3444SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 20FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2014Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUISGARBAGEName: 0.2208Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.23ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 2.547776ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 2.632TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3444SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 20FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2013Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUISGARBAGEName: EMI: NotreportedBusinessTypes: NotreportedRegulatoryStatusLastChanged: NotreportedAcceptingTiresFromPublic: Hauler-RegisteredCurrentHaulerStatus: ActiveCurrentStatus: 805) 547-6454MailingPhone: San LuisObispoMailingCounty: 93401MailingZip: CAMailingState: San LuisObispoMailingCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRdMailingAddress: JeffClarinContactPerson: jeff.clarin@wasteconnections.comBusinessEmailAddress: 805) 543-0875FacilityPhone: 1749418FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: MADERA DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC.Name: HAULERS: CAL08003272EPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 535 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340C378139WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: ConstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 478832RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadOperatorAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyOperatorName: 03/01/2019StatusDate: TerminatedStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: ConstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: 340C378139WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: SAN LUISGARBAGEName: NPDES: 0.2208Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.23ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 2.547776ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 2.632TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 536 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 15-NOV-16CertificationDate: MaintenanceManagerCertifierTitle: ChrisBowerCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NDirDischargeUswaterInd: NConstypeWaterSewerInd: NConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NConstypeTransportInd: NConstypeResidentialInd: NConstypeReconsInd: NConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: YConstypeIndustrialInd: NConstypeGasLineInd: NConstypeElectricalLineInd: NConstypeCommertialInd: NConstypeCommLineInd: NConstypeCableLineInd: NConstypeBelowGroundInd: NConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NConstypeLinearUtilityInd: ProjectEngineerDeveloperContactTitle: JosephSzczepkowskiDeveloperContact: 30092DeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NorcrossDeveloperCity: 3740 DavinciCourtDeveloperAddress: HZIU Kompogas SLOIncDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: patrickf@wasteconnection.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 805-543-0875OperatorContactPhone: DistrictManagerOperatorContactTitle: PatrickFentonOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadOperatorAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyOperatorName: patrickf@wasteconnection.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-543-0875ContactPhone: DistrictManagerContactTitle: PatrickFentonContact: AcresPlaceSizeUnit: 13PlaceSize: 11/15/2016StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 11/15/2016ProcessedDate: 11/15/2016ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 537 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadDischargeAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 11/15/2016EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: ConstructionProgramType: 340C378139WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: 478832RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000002NPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 538 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: San Luis GarbageCompanyDischargeName: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 09/06/2013EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I024449WDID: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: 441092RegulatoryMeasureID: 0AgencyNumber: 3Region: CAS000001NPDESNumber: ActiveFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 539 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: MikeDe@wasteconnections.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 661-816-4812OperatorContactPhone: Division VicePresidentOperatorContactTitle: MikeDeanOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadOperatorAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyOperatorName: PatrickF@wasteconnections.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-543-0875ContactPhone: DistrictManagerContactTitle: PatrickFentonContact: AcresPlaceSizeUnit: 13PlaceSize: 09/06/2013StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 09/06/2013ProcessedDate: 09/06/2013ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I024449WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 441092RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 540 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadDischargeAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 09/06/2013EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I024449WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 441092RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 4212-Local Trucking WithoutStoragePrimarySic: 26-JUN-15CertificationDate: Division VicePresidentCertifierTitle: MikeDeanCertifier: San Luis Obispo Creek (below Osos Street)Receiving Water Name: YDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 541 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I024449WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 542 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: MikeDe@wasteconnections.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 661-816-4812OperatorContactPhone: Division VicePresidentOperatorContactTitle: MikeDeanOperatorContact: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadOperatorAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyOperatorName: PatrickF@wasteconnections.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 805-543-0875ContactPhone: DistrictManagerContactTitle: PatrickFentonContact: AcresPlaceSizeUnit: 13PlaceSize: 09/06/2013StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 09/06/2013ProcessedDate: 09/06/2013ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I024449WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 441092RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadOperatorAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyOperatorName: 09/06/2013StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 543 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRoadDischargeAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 09/06/2013EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I024449WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 441092RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 4212-Local Trucking WithoutStoragePrimarySic: 26-JUN-15CertificationDate: Division VicePresidentCertifierTitle: MikeDeanCertifier: San Luis Obispo Creek (below Osos Street)Receiving Water Name: YDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 544 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3Region: 4212SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Local Trucking WithoutStoragePlace/Project Type: 4388 Old Santa Fe Road, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: CIWQS: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued)S113017652 TC6926581.2s Page 545 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.651675Longitude: 35.240094Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: 11/08/2018TerminationDate: 11/15/2016EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000002NPDESNumber: 340C378139WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterconstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: CONSTWProgram: 3Region: NotreportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - IndustrialPlace/Project Type: 4388 Old Santa Fe Road, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: San Luis GarbageCompanyAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FEROADAddress: SAN LUISGARBAGEName: 120.651458Longitude: 35.239045Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 09/06/2013EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I024449WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S113017652 CAD983592189EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: CB AND IINCHandlerName: 20121016DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 956 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster Q 0.181 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD CAD983592189 Q157 RCRA NonGen / NLRCBANDIINC 1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 546 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: CB AND IINCOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: C B AND IINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-2210MailingCity,State,Zip: PO BOX12210MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: PLANTMGRContactTitle: RCOFFMAN@CBI.COMContactEmail: 805-546-8105ContactFax: 805-441-6996ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-2210ContactCity,State,Zip: PO BOX12210ContactAddress: ROY RCOFFMANContactName: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 547 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CHICAGO BRIDGE ANDIRONOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYLETHYLWasteDescription: F005WasteCode: TETRACHLOROETHYLENEWasteDescription: D039WasteCode: METHYL ETHYLKETONEWasteDescription: D035WasteCode: LEADWasteDescription: D008WasteCode: CADMIUMWasteDescription: D006WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2003Year: Biennial: List of Years NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20121029HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 548 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000131DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ROYCOFFMANOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 832-513-1600Owner/Operator Telephone: THE WOODLANDS, TX77380Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: ONE CB AND IPLAZAOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000128DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: C B AND IINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000128DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CB AND IINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 815-439-6000Owner/Operator Telephone: PLAINFIELD, IL 60544-8929Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1501 N DIVISIONSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 549 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 832-513-1600Owner/Operator Telephone: THE WOODLANDS, TX77380Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: ONE CB AND IPLAZAOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000128DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: C B AND IINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000131DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: ROYCOFFMANOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: PLAINFIELD, IL60544Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1501 N DIVISIONSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000131DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: C B AND ICONSTRUCTORSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: PLAINFIELD, IL60544Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1501 N DIVISIONSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000131DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: C B AND ICONSTRUCTORSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20000128DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: CB AND IINCOwner/Operator Name: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 550 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation C B AND I CONSTRUCTORSTANKHandlerName: 20040224ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CB AND IINCHandlerName: 20121016ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CB AND IINCHandlerName: 20110606ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: C B AND I TRUSCOTANKHandlerName: 20000228ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: C B AND I CONSTRUCTORSTANKHandlerName: 20040224ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 551 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFinalMonetaryAmount: NotreportedProposedAmount: NotreportedSEPTypeDescription: NotreportedSEPType: NotreportedSEPDefaultedDate: NotreportedSEPActualDate: NotreportedSEPScheduledCompletionDate: NotreportedSEPExpenditureAmount: NotreportedSEPSequenceNumber: NotreportedEnforcementResponsibleSub-Organization: JPOLEEnforcementResponsiblePerson: WRITTENINFORMALEnforcementType: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Lead Agency: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Respondent Name: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Sequence Number: NotreportedDispositionStatusDescription: NotreportedDispositionStatus: NotreportedDispositionStatusDate: NotreportedAppealResolutionDate: NotreportedAppealInitiatedDate: NoCorrectiveActionComponent: NotreportedEnforcementAttorney: NotreportedEnforcementDocketNumber: EPAEnforcementResponsibleAgency: 20050617DateofEnforcementAction: 001EnforcementIdentifier: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: EPAViolationResponsibleAgency: DocumentedReturntoComplianceQualifier: 20050405ActualReturntoComplianceDate: 20050321DateViolationwasDetermined: Generators - GeneralViolationShortDescription: EPAAgencyWhichDeterminedViolation: YesFoundViolation: Facility Has Received Notices of Violation: METAL TANK (HEAVY GAUGE) MANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 33242NAICSCode: PLATE WORKMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 332313NAICSCode: OIL AND GAS PIPELINE AND RELATED STRUCTURESCONSTRUCTIONNAICSDescription: 23712NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 552 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20050321EvaluationDate: NotreportedFormerCitation: NotreportedRequestAgency: NotreportedDateResponseReceived: NotreportedDateofRequest: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: 20050405ActualReturntoComplianceDate: NotreportedEvaluationResponsibleSub-Organization: JPOLEEvaluationResponsiblePersonIdentifier: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluationTypeDescription: YesFoundViolation: EPAEvaluationResponsibleAgency: 20050321EvaluationDate: Evaluation Action Summary: NotreportedFinalAmount: NotreportedFinalCount: NotreportedPaidAmount: NotreportedFinalMonetaryAmount: NotreportedProposedAmount: NotreportedSEPTypeDescription: NotreportedSEPType: NotreportedSEPDefaultedDate: NotreportedSEPActualDate: NotreportedSEPScheduledCompletionDate: NotreportedSEPExpenditureAmount: NotreportedSEPSequenceNumber: NotreportedEnforcementResponsibleSub-Organization: JPOLEEnforcementResponsiblePerson: NotreportedEnforcementType: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Lead Agency: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Respondent Name: NotreportedConsent/Final Order Sequence Number: NotreportedDispositionStatusDescription: NotreportedDispositionStatus: NotreportedDispositionStatusDate: NotreportedAppealResolutionDate: NotreportedAppealInitiatedDate: NoCorrectiveActionComponent: NotreportedEnforcementAttorney: NotreportedEnforcementDocketNumber: EPAEnforcementResponsibleAgency: 20050426DateofEnforcementAction: 001EnforcementIdentifier: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: EPAViolationResponsibleAgency: DocumentedReturntoComplianceQualifier: 20050405ActualReturntoComplianceDate: 20050321DateViolationwasDetermined: Generators - GeneralViolationShortDescription: EPAAgencyWhichDeterminedViolation: YesFoundViolation: NotreportedFinalAmount: NotreportedFinalCount: NotreportedPaidAmount: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 TC6926581.2s Page 553 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFormerCitation: NotreportedRequestAgency: NotreportedDateResponseReceived: NotreportedDateofRequest: NotreportedScheduledComplianceDate: 20050405ActualReturntoComplianceDate: NotreportedEvaluationResponsibleSub-Organization: JPOLEEvaluationResponsiblePersonIdentifier: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluationTypeDescription: YesFoundViolation: EPAEvaluationResponsibleAgency: CB AND I INC (Continued)1000595288 NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007524RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0004396FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: 120.65147Longitude: 35.23912Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007522RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0004396FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Aboveground PetroleumStorageCERSDescription: 10436548CERSID: 64673SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: CERS TANKS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10436548CERSID: 64673SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 956 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster Q 0.181 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SE CERSTANKS4388OLDSANTAFERD N/A Q158 CERS HAZWASTESANLUISGARBAGECOMPANY S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 554 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: Returned to compliance on 08/12/2019.Violation Notes: designated facility which received the waste. for transport shall be kept until receiving a signed copy from the transporter. The manifest signed at the time the waste was accepted three years from the date the waste was accepted by the initial Failure to keep a copy of each properly signed manifest for atleastViolationDescription: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a) 22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 07-22-2019ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10436548CERSID: 64673SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: CERS: 120.65147Longitude: 35.23912Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0018328RecordId: AGT ANNUAL TANKPERMITProgramElement: 1201ProgramElementCode: FA0004396FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: 120.65147Longitude: 35.23912Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007523RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0004396FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYName: 120.65147Longitude: 35.23912Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 555 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: VIA PUBLIC PORTAL. Returned to compliance on 05/12/2014. SUBMIT EMERGENCY RESPONSEPLANViolationNotes: business plan for a release or threatened release. Failure to include adequate emergency response procedures intheViolationDescription: Section(s) 25504(b) HSC 6.95 25504(b) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 03-24-2014ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: 3/1 gerrys@wcnx.org PASS WORD: Rosemary HMBP TO BE CERTIFIED ANNUALLY BY BUSINESS PLAN VIA PUBLIC PORTAL BY 4/23/2014. USER NAME: Returned to compliance on 05/12/2014. SUBMIT HAZARDOUSMATERIALViolationNotes: thresholds quantities of 55 gallons/500 lbs/200 cubic feet. Business Plan when storing hazardous materials at or above the Owner/Operator failed to complete and/or submit a HazardousMaterialsViolationDescription: Section(s) 25505(a) HSC 6.95 25505(a) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 03-24-2014ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: O2, ACETYLENE, MIXTURE) FROM AQUEOUS PARTS WASHER COMPRESSED GASES, 200 CUBIC FEET OR GREATER INVENTORY: WASTE OIL WASTE ANTI-FREEZE WASTE WATER-BASED PAINT WASTE Returned to compliance on 05/12/2014. INCLUDE IN HMBPCHEMICALViolationNotes: for all reportable hazardous materials on site. Failure to complete and/or submit hazardous material inventoryformsViolationDescription: Section(s) 25504(a) HSC 6.95 25504(a) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 03-24-2014ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: WITHIN 30 DAYS OF A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE. 10/31/2015 HMBP UPDATE/CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED ANNUALLY BY 3/1 OR FUEL TANK, AND UPDATE MAP TO INCLUDE NEW DIESEL FUEL TANK, BY BUSINESS PLAN WITH NEW EMERGENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTACT, ADD DIESEL Returned to compliance on 10/07/2015. UPDATE HAZARDOUSMATERIALViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and/or electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: Section(s) 25508(d) HSC 6.95 25508(d) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 10-01-2015ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 556 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: PORTAL BY 4/23/2014 Returned to compliance on 05/12/2014. SUBMIT MAPS FOR NEW FACILITYTOViolationNotes: CUPA. Failure to complete and/or submit an annotated site map if requiredbyViolationDescription: Chapter 4, Section(s) 2729.2(a)(3) 19 CCR 4 2729.2(a)(3) - California Code of Regulations, Title 19,Citation: 03-24-2014ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: APSAViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: inspections. basis. Please keep test results available for review during future testing procedure is implemented, and documented on an at least annual Returned to compliance on 10/20/2020. Please ensure a fillgaugeViolationNotes: proper operation. Failure to regularly test liquid level sensing devices toensureViolationDescription: 6.67, Section(s) 25270.4.5(a) HSC 6.67 25270.4.5(a) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 10-20-2020ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: HOUSE (AKA OUT HOUSE). Returned to compliance on 05/10/2017. PROPERLY LABEL THE USED OILPUMPViolationNotes: date. characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation name and address of the generator, physical and chemical portable tanks with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containersandViolationDescription: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HWViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: ARE NOT. OBSERVED PAPER FILTER AMONG METAL FILTERS. PAPER FROM METAL FILTERS. METAL FILTER ARE RECYCLABLE, PAPER FILTERS Returned to compliance on 04/25/2017. SEPARATE USED PAPER OIL/FUELViolationNotes: with the requirements. Failure to properly manage used oil and/or fuel filters inaccordanceViolationDescription: Section(s) 25250.22 HSC 6.5 25250.22 - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5,Citation: 04-25-2017ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 557 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: HMBP inforeceivedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-21-2020EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-22-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: CERTIFICATION OF HMBP REQUIRED BY 3/1. SUBMITTED THROUGH SLO COUNTY EHS PUBLIC PORTAL. REMINDER-ANNUAL ALL VIOLATIONS CORRECTED. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL BUSINESS PLAN (HMBP)Eval Notes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-12-2014EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-25-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: in CERS. Emergency and Environmental contacts on the Form S Owner/Operator page Returned to compliance on 10/29/2020. Please change yourPrimaryViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 10-20-2020ViolationDate: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYSiteName: 64673SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 558 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10-01-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: ITEMS MARKED "N/A" WERE NOT PART OF THIS INSPECTION.Eval Notes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-10-2017EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: PLAN TO INCLUDE THE NEW DIESEL FUEL TANK. ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM TO BE ADDED TO FACILITY. UPDATESPCCEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 10-01-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-12-2019EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 07-22-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-22-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 04-25-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 559 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-25-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 03-24-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: WASHING IS DIRECTED TO A 3 TANK DIGESTOR. FACILITY DOES NOT HAVE AN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR. WASTE WATER FROMTRUCKEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-24-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 10-20-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-20-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: PLATFORM FOR EASE OF SPILL CLEAN-UP. SUGGEST PLACING DRUMS FOR WASTE OIL FILTERS ON SPILL CONTAINMENT ON-CALL HAZMAT SPECIALIST FROM ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, AND CALL CAL OES. AND LARGE SPILL (>5 GALLONS), CALL SHERIFF’S DISPATCH TO ALERT THE SANITATION WORKERS TO REPORT SPILLS IMMEDIATELY, AND, IF AFTER HOURS, SUGGEST PLACING SIGN AT DIESEL FUEL TANK WITH INSTRUCTIONSFOREvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 560 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JEFFCLARINEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JeffreyClarinEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.652940Longitude: 35.267820Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10436548ProgramID: HWGEnvIntTypeCode: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYFacilityName: 64673SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: waste storage areas are normally closed (lock out?). Please revisit procedure to ensure valves draining fuel tank padandEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 10-20-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-05-2015EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 561 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 748-8041,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ATTN: JEFFCLARINEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: DistrictManagerEntityTitle: JeffreyClarinEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 748-8041,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOMPANYEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY (Continued) S122353859 TC6926581.2s Page 562 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.40000Tons: Disposal Method: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2019Year: 0.36300Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: AZD081705402TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2019Year: 2.47500Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2019Year: 0.23750Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2019Year: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055476452Telephone: JIMPARKSContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOName: HAZNET: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020186RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0014736FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: AT&T - SE16WName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 956 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster Q 0.181 mi.HWTS Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SE HAZNET4388OLDSANTAFERD N/A Q159 CUPAListingsSANLUISGARBAGECO S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 563 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20171214ReceiptDate: 8/7/2018 18:30:26CreationDate: 20171212ShipmentDate: CAL000383568GenEPAID: 2017Year: Additional Info: 1 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access NotreportedTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: CA Waste Code: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.35Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.1815Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: AZD081705402TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2017Year: 1.6Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.36500Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2018Year: 1.87500Tons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAL000330453TSDEPAID: CAL000383568Gepaid: 2018Year: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued) S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 564 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017878983JJKManifestID: 20171023ReceiptDate: 6/13/2018 18:30:39CreationDate: 20171017ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 600WasteQuantity: 0.3QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 018042682JJKManifestID: 20171121ReceiptDate: 6/28/2018 18:30:17CreationDate: 20171116ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 018042629JJKManifestID: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued)S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 565 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 0.2QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017483724JJKManifestID: 20170914ReceiptDate: 6/13/2018 18:30:51CreationDate: 20170907ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017878983JJKManifestID: 20171023ReceiptDate: 6/13/2018 18:30:39CreationDate: 20171017ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 450WasteQuantity: 0.225QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued)S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 566 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 017503868JJKManifestID: 20170629ReceiptDate: 5/17/2018 18:31:47CreationDate: 20170623ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 0.2QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017482485JJKManifestID: 20170817ReceiptDate: 6/13/2018 18:31:35CreationDate: 20170815ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017482485JJKManifestID: 20170817ReceiptDate: 6/13/2018 18:31:35CreationDate: 20170815ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued)S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 567 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017027983JJKManifestID: 20170302ReceiptDate: 5/19/2017 18:30:40CreationDate: 20170227ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 017503868JJKManifestID: 20170629ReceiptDate: 5/17/2018 18:31:47CreationDate: 20170623ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 800WasteQuantity: 0.4QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEANTECHENVIRONMENTALTransName: CAL000330453TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued)S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 568 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESLLCTransName: AZD081705402TSDFEPAID: HERITAGETRANSPORTTrans2Name: IND058484114Trans2EPAID: CLEANTECH ENVIRONMENTALINCTransName: CAL000368136TransEPAID: 014792809JJKManifestID: 20160105ReceiptDate: 11/7/2016 18:32:02CreationDate: 20151215ShipmentDate: CAL000383568GenEPAID: 2016Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.22935QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 291 - LatexwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 009437145JJKManifestID: 20131107ReceiptDate: 12/27/2013 22:15:22CreationDate: 20131030ShipmentDate: CAL000383568GenEPAID: 2013Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 0.2QuantityTons: H010 - Metals Recovery Including Retoring,Smelting,Chemicals,EctMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued) S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 569 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEntityTitle: Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&TCaliforniaEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Peter Burnell, Sigma Consultants, Inc.Entity Name: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.651530Longitude: 35.239110Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10852735ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: AT&T - SE16WFacilityName: 568679SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-13-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10852735CERSID: 568679SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: AT&T - SE16WName: CERS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 45WasteQuantity: 0.1485QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued) S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 570 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 75202AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: TXAffiliationState: DallasAffiliationCity: 308 S. Akard St., 17thFloorAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AT&T EH&S Hotline - Option #1EntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 800) 566-9347,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AT&TCaliforniaEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: National EPCRAManagerEntityTitle: JeremyMcGrueEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 75202AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: TXAffiliationState: DallasAffiliationCity: 308 S. Akard St., 17thFloorAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 214) 464-1712,Affiliation Phone: 75202AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: TXAffiliationState: DallasAffiliationCity: 308 S. Akard St., 17thFloorAffiliationAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued)S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 571 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDFacilityAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2013-03-15 11:14:40.70000IssuedEPAIDDate: General AutomotiveRepairNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: 2013-03-15 11:14:40.777CreateDate: CAL000383568EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDContactAddress: JIMPARKSContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDOwnerAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDMailingAddress: JIMPARKSMailingName: 09/01/2020LastActDate: 03/15/2013CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000383568EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOName: HWTS: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&TCaliforniaEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued) S123077696 TC6926581.2s Page 572 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: CHRISBOWEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: CHRISB@WCNX.ORGContactEmail: 805-543-0620ContactFax: 805-441-6241ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDContactAddress: CHRISBOWERContactName: CAL000383568EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOHandlerName: 20130315DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 956 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster Q 0.181 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD CAL000383568 Q160 RCRA NonGen / NLRSANLUISGARBAGECO 1024837685 TC6926581.2s Page 573 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-441-6241Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CHRISBOWEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-543-0875Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued)1024837685 TC6926581.2s Page 574 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SAN LUIS GARBAGECOHandlerName: 20130315ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: SAN LUIS GARBAGE CO (Continued) 1024837685 PermittedRegulationStatus: Waste Permitting, Compliance and MitigationDivisionEnforcingAgencyDepartment: Department of Resources Recycling andRecoveryEnforcingAgencyLegalName: Reporting Agency Department: County of San LuisObispoReportingAgencyLegalName: San LuisObispoLocalGovernment: CentralCoastSWRCBRegion: San LuisObispoARBDistrict: NotreportedEPAFederalRegistryID: NotreportedClosedIllegalAbandonedCategory: NotreportedAbsorbedBy: ActiveOperationalStatus: NotreportedAbsorbedOn: NoIsFinancialAssurancesResponsible: NoIsSiteInertDebrisEngineeredFill: NoIsClosedIllegalAbandoned: NoIsArchived: CandiceHoughtonPointofContact: 40-AA-0051SWISNumber: 40-AA-0051FacilityID: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FE SPRINGS RD.Address: HZIU KOMPOGAS SLO, INC.Name: SWF/LF (SWIS): 956 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster Q 0.181 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE CERS4388OLDSANTAFESPRINGSRD. N/A Q161 SWF/LFHZIUKOMPOGASSLO, INC.S121504873 TC6926581.2s Page 575 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.65122Longitude: 35.24024Latitude: PermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: Non-DisposalOnlySiteType: ActiveSiteOperationalStatus: HZIU Kompogas SLO, Inc.Site Name: 40-AA-0051SWISNumber: Operator: Waste Permitting, Compliance and MitigationDivisionEnforcingAgencyDepartment: Department of Resources Recycling andRecoveryEnforcingAgencyLegalName: Reporting Agency Department: County of San LuisObispoReportingAgencyLegalName: 93401ZIPCode: CAState: San LuisObispoCity: 4388 Old Santa Fe Springs Rd.Street Address: San LuisObispoLocalGovernment: CentralCoastSWRCBRegion: San LuisObispoARBDistrict: San LuisObispoCounty: NotreportedEPAFederalRegistryID: NotreportedClosedIllegalAbandonedCategory: NotreportedAbsorbedBy: NotreportedAbsorbedOn: NoIsFinancialAssurancesResponsible: NoIsSiteInertDebrisEngineeredFill: NoIsClosedIllegalAbandoned: NoSiteIsArchived: PermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: ActiveSiteOperationalStatus: CandiceHoughtonPointofContact: NotreportedPermittedDepthType: NotreportedPermittedDepth: NotreportedPermittedElevationType: NotreportedPermittedElevation: NotreportedDisposalAcreage: 4.8TotalAcreage: Tons peryearCapacityUnits: 36500Capacity: NotreportedRemainingCapacityDate: NotreportedRemainingCapacity: Tons perweekThroughputUnits: 700Throughput: MonthlyInspectionFrequency: NotreportedCeaseOperationType: NotreportedCeaseOperation: NotreportedWDRLandfillClass: NotreportedWDRNumber: Solid WasteFacilityActivityClassification: In-VesselDigestionCategory: NoActivityIsArchived: Medium Volume In-Vessel DigestionFacilityActivity: HZIU Kompogas SLO, Inc.Site Name: 40-AA-0051SWISNumber: Activity: HZIU KOMPOGAS SLO, INC. (Continued)S121504873 TC6926581.2s Page 576 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Non-DisposalOnlySiteType: PermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: ActiveSiteOperationalStatus: NoSiteIsArchived: GreenMaterialsWasteType: Medium Volume In-Vessel DigestionFacilityActivity: HZIU Kompogas SLO, Inc.Site Name: 40-AA-0051SWISNumber: Solid WasteFacilityActivityClassification: In-VesselDigestionActivityCategory: PermittedActivityRegulatoryStatus: ActiveActivityOperationalStatus: NoActivityIsArchived: CandiceHoughtonPointofContact: Non-DisposalOnlySiteType: PermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: ActiveSiteOperationalStatus: NoSiteIsArchived: FoodWastesWasteType: Medium Volume In-Vessel DigestionFacilityActivity: HZIU Kompogas SLO, Inc.Site Name: 40-AA-0051SWISNumber: Waste: 805) 543-0875ContactPhone: NotreportedContactEmail: PresidentContactTitle: AstorLawsonContactName: NotreportedStartedOn: NoIsArchived: 120.65122Longitude: 35.24024Latitude: PermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: Non-DisposalOnlySiteType: ActiveSiteOperationalStatus: HZIU Kompogas SLO, Inc.Site Name: 93401OwnerZip: CAOwnerState: San LuisObispoOwnerCity: 4388 Old Santa FeRdOwnerAddress: Corral De Piedra LandCompanyOwner: 40-AA-0051SWISNumber: Owner: 93401OperatorZip: CAOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 4300 Old Santa Fe Rd.Street Address: 916) 616-3402ContactPhone: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactName: NotreportedStartedOn: Kompogas SLO, LLCOperator: NoIsArchived: HZIU KOMPOGAS SLO, INC. (Continued)S121504873 TC6926581.2s Page 577 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8055430875,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Corral De Piedra LandCompanyEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 9166163402,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Kompogas SLO, LLCEntityName: LegalOperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Solid Waste and RecycleSitesCERSDescription: 40-AA-0051CERSID: 509307SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: 4388 OLD SANTA FE SPRINGS RD.Address: HZIU KOMPOGAS SLO, INC.Name: CERS: Solid WasteFacilityActivityClassification: In-VesselDigestionActivityCategory: PermittedActivityRegulatoryStatus: ActiveActivityOperationalStatus: NoActivityIsArchived: CandiceHoughtonPointofContact: HZIU KOMPOGAS SLO, INC. (Continued) S121504873 35.25013Longitude: 35.25013Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0009296RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 5+ AG HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0773ProgramElementCode: FA0006028FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 215 MEISSNERLNAddress: MARTINON, JAVIERName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 962 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster X 0.182 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW 215 MEISSNER LN N/A X162 CUPAListingsMARTINON, JAVIER S117845393 TC6926581.2s Page 578 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: YesFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: PACIFIC BELLTELEPHONEOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: PACIFIC BELLTELEPHONEOwnerName: DALLAS, TX75202MailingCity,State,Zip: 308 S AKARDSTREETMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: JC3746@SBC.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 214-464-1805ContactTelephone: DALLAS, TX75202ContactCity,State,Zip: 308 S AKARDSTREETContactAddress: JAMES ACRANMERContactName: CAT080024268EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANROADHandlerAddress: PACIFIC BELLTELEPHONEHandlerName: 20051102DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: CERS CUPA Listings Cortese ECHO FINDS CA FID UST HIST UST 997 ft.SWEEPSUSTSite1of2inclusterY 0.189 mi.CERS HAZ WASTE Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/8-1/4 USTSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SW LUST196SUBURBANROAD CAT080024268 Y163 RCRA-SQGPACIFICBELLTELEPHONE 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 579 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN RAMON, CA94583Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: P.O. BOX 5095, RM. 3E000Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19811001DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PACIFIC BELL (DBA: SBC)Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: Click Here for Biennial Reporting System Data: 2003Year: Biennial: List of Years NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20060127HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 580 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PACIFICBELLHandlerName: 19810120ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPHCOOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: DALLAS, TX75202Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 308 SAKARDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19760101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PACIFIC BELLTELEPHONEOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19811001DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PACIFIC BELL (DBA: SBC)Owner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19760101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PACIFIC BELLTELEPHONEOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued)1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 581 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607956723GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: SBC (PAC BELL)Name: LUST: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: WIRED AND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS (EXCEPT SATELLITE)NAICS Description: 51711NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PACIFIC BELL (DBA: SBC)Handler Name: 20040226ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: YesLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PACIFIC BELLTELEPHONEHandlerName: 20051102ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 582 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/13/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: 08/25/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: ExcavationAction: 06/11/2003Date: REMEDIATIONActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: Preliminary Site AssessmentWorkplanAction: 10/31/2003Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: LeakReportedAction: 06/20/2003Date: OtherActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: Closure/No Further ActionLetterAction: 05/18/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: 11/19/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: UnknownAction: 08/26/2003Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 06/11/2003Date: OtherActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedSiteHistory: Diesel, GasolinePotentialContaminantsofConcern: Aquifer used for drinking watersupplyPotentialMediaAffect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: State RecordsCenterFileLocation: NotreportedLocalAgency: 3518RBCaseNumber: NotreportedCaseWorker: 05/18/2004StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: 120.6684718Longitude: 35.2440373Latitude: T0607956723GlobalId: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 583 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.6694Longitude: 35.2444Latitude: T0607925011GlobalId: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607925011GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYLeadAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196SUBURBANAddress: PACIFICBELLName: 05/18/2004StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607956723GlobalId: 01/27/2004StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607956723GlobalId: 10/31/2003StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607956723GlobalId: 06/17/2003StatusDate: Open - RemediationStatus: T0607956723GlobalId: 06/11/2003StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607956723GlobalId: 06/11/2003StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607956723GlobalId: LUST: Preliminary Site AssessmentReportAction: 02/06/2004Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: Tank Removal Report / UST SamplingReportAction: 08/26/2003Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: LeakStoppedAction: 06/11/2003Date: OtherActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: 08/14/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607956723GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 584 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 03/23/1995StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607925011GlobalId: LUST: LeakStoppedAction: 03/23/1995Date: OtherActionType: T0607925011GlobalId: 13267RequirementAction: 08/13/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607925011GlobalId: Free ProductRemovalAction: 03/26/1995Date: REMEDIATIONActionType: T0607925011GlobalId: LeakReportedAction: 03/23/1995Date: OtherActionType: T0607925011GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 03/23/1995Date: OtherActionType: T0607925011GlobalId: 13267RequirementAction: 11/19/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607925011GlobalId: LUST: 0PhoneNumber: NotreportedEmail: NOCITYCity: NotreportedAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYOrganizationName: UNKNOWNContactName: Local AgencyCaseworkerContactType: T0607925011GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedSiteHistory: GasolinePotentialContaminantsofConcern: Aquifer used for drinking watersupplyPotentialMediaAffect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: LocalAgencyFileLocation: SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYLocalAgency: 3492RBCaseNumber: NotreportedCaseWorker: 03/26/1996StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 585 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05-27-93ReferralDate: NotreportedBoardOfEqualization: 9Number: 17407CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: PACIFIC BELL (SE-164)Name: 3NumberOfTanks: REGUNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTankUse: 01-05-93ActiveDate: 10000Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-000-017407-000001SWRCBTankId: G-80-10K-0OwnerTankId: 02-29-88CreatedDate: 05-27-93ActionDate: 05-27-93ReferralDate: NotreportedBoardOfEqualization: 9Number: 17407CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: PACIFIC BELL (SE-164)Name: SWEEPS UST: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10435963CERSID: 386049SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - SE164Name: CERS HAZ WASTE: 120.6668164Longitude: 35.2459449Latitude: NotreportedCERSID: SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYPermittingAgency: FA0002817FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: PACIFICBELLName: UST: 03/26/1996StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607925011GlobalId: 03/25/1996StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607925011GlobalId: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 586 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoneLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: REGULARTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00010000TankCapacity: 1980YearInstalled: G-80-10K-0ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0003TotalTanks: SAN FRANCISCO, CA94107OwnerCity,St,Zip: 370 THIRDSTREETOwnerAddress: PACIFICBELLOwnerName: 4155426758Telephone: E. J. KOEHLERContactName: PHONE CO.Other Type: OtherFacilityType: 00000006890FacilityID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002B972.pdfURL: 0002B972FileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANROADAddress: PACIFIC BELL (SE-70R)Name: HIST UST: NotreportedNumberOfTanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTankUse: 02-13-91ActiveDate: 4000Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-000-017407-000003SWRCBTankId: D-80-4KOwnerTankId: 02-29-88CreatedDate: 05-27-93ActionDate: 05-27-93ReferralDate: NotreportedBoardOfEqualization: 9Number: 17407CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: PACIFIC BELL (SE-164)Name: NotreportedNumberOfTanks: REGUNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTankUse: 02-13-91ActiveDate: 10000Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-000-017407-000002SWRCBTankId: G-80-10K-0OwnerTankId: 02-29-88CreatedDate: 05-27-93ActionDate: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued)1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 587 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STATE MASTER HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002951814RegistryID: FINDS: ActiveStatus: NotreportedComments: NotreportedEPAID: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedDUNsNumber: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO93401MailingCity,St,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: P.O. BOX 7631DEPT30MailingAddress: NotreportedMailTo: 4155426758FacilityPhone: NotreportedSICCode: NotreportedCorteseCode: 00006890RegulatedID: UTNKARegulatedBy: 40001484FacilityID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: DIESELTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00004000TankCapacity: 1980YearInstalled: D-80-4KContainerNum: 003TankNum: NoneLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: UNLEADEDTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00010000TankCapacity: 1980YearInstalled: G-80-10K-0ContainerNum: 002TankNum: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 588 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607925011GlobalID: NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196SUBURBANAddress: PACIFICBELLName: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607956723GlobalID: NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: SBC (PAC BELL)Name: CORTESE: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANROADAddress: PACIFIC BELLTELEPHONEName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002951814DFRURL: 110002951814RegistryID: 1000251528Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued)1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 589 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 35.24498Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002511RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE GENERATOR (6+ waste streams)Program Element: 1179ProgramElementCode: FA0002817FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - SE164Name: 120.66842Longitude: 35.24498Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019541RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZWASTE GEN (RCRA-LQG)Program Element: 1050ProgramElementCode: FA0002817FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - SE164Name: 120.66842Longitude: 35.24498Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002017RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 5-10ProgramElement: 0763ProgramElementCode: FA0002817FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - SE164Name: 120.66842Longitude: 35.24498Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002813RecordId: SLO CITY - RENEWAL - UST ANNUAL PERMITFEEProgramElement: 0351ProgramElementCode: FA0002817FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - SE164Name: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued)1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 590 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: CERS database. HMBP has been updated electronically for CY 2019 and submitted totheEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-30-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: good order. No violations noted Good employee training program with records available - facilityinEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-30-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-10-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-03-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: CY 2018 and submitted electron Good employee training program, HMBP to be updated electronicallyforEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-01-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10435963CERSID: 386049SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: AT&T CALIFORNIA - SE164Name: CERS: 120.66842Longitude: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 591 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TXAffiliationState: DallasAffiliationCity: 308 S. Akard St., 17thFloorAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AT&T EH&S Hotline - Option #1EntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.668340Longitude: 35.244900Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10435963ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: AT&T California - SE164FacilityName: 386049SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-28-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HWEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-19-2021EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: submitted. No violations noted. Facility in good order, recently updated version of HMBP hasbeenEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-03-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-19-2021EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 592 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEntityTitle: Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&TCaliforniaEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Peter Burnell, Sigma Consultants, Inc.Entity Name: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 800) 566-9347,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AT&TCaliforniaEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: National EPCRAManagerEntityTitle: JeremyMcGrueEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 75202AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: TXAffiliationState: DallasAffiliationCity: 308 S. Akard St., 17thFloorAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 75202AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued)1000251528 TC6926581.2s Page 593 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leaking Underground Storage Tank CleanupSiteCERSDescription: T0607956723CERSID: 245829SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196 SUBURBANRDAddress: SBC (PAC BELL)Name: 0,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: NOCITYAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: UNKNOWN - SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYEntityName: Local AgencyCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank CleanupSiteCERSDescription: T0607925011CERSID: 242732SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 196SUBURBANAddress: PACIFICBELLName: 214) 464-1712,Affiliation Phone: 75202AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: TXAffiliationState: DallasAffiliationCity: 308 S. Akard St., 17thFloorAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&TCaliforniaEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE (Continued) 1000251528 PR0007821RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005221FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3485EMPRESAAddress: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1045 ft. Site 8 of 11 in cluster S 0.198 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3485 EMPRESA N/A S164 CUPAListingsJENIKE & JOHANSON, INC S110743823 TC6926581.2s Page 594 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66644Longitude: 35.25270Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007820RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005221FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3485EMPRESAAddress: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INCName: 120.66644Longitude: 35.25270Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INC (Continued) S110743823 NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: SEKISUI SPECIALTY CHEMICALS AMERICALLCOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULKSOLIDSOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: BRET.HANN@SEKISUI-SC.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 281-658-7598ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADRContactAddress: BRET FHANNContactName: CAP000203307EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADRHandlerAddress: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULKSOLIDSHandlerName: 20100112DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1045 ft. Site 9 of 11 in cluster S 0.198 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3485 EMPRESA DR CAP000203307 S165 RCRA NonGen / NLRJENIKEANDJOHANSONBULKSOLIDS 1025880893 TC6926581.2s Page 595 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20100205HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULK SOLIDS (Continued)1025880893 TC6926581.2s Page 596 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULKSOLIDSHandlerName: 20091009ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19810508DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULKSOLIDSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20090919DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: SEKISUI SPECIALTY CHEMICALS AMERICALLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19810508DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULKSOLIDSOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20090919DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: SEKISUI SPECIALTY CHEMICALS AMERICALLCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULK SOLIDS (Continued)1025880893 TC6926581.2s Page 597 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, ANDLIFENAICSDescription: 541712NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULKSOLIDSHandlerName: 20100112ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: JENIKE AND JOHANSON BULK SOLIDS (Continued) 1025880893 Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10438039CERSID: 550189SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3485EMPRESAAddress: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INCName: CERS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438039CERSID: 550189SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3485EMPRESAAddress: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 1045 ft. Site 10 of 11 in cluster S 0.198 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW CERS3485EMPRESA N/A S166 CERS HAZWASTEJENIKE & JOHANSON, INC S124442128 TC6926581.2s Page 598 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 3485EMPRESAAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Portal. No changes to chemica Updated and submitted Hazardous Materials Business Plan to E ZSubmitEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-14-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: in good order no violations no HMBP has been updated electronically via E Z Submit Portal. FacilityEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-27-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: been updated and submitted elect Annual facillity inspection. Hazardous Materials Business PlanhasEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-18-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Submit Portal" for CY 2018. Faci Facility has updated the HMBP electronically and submitted to "EZEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-15-2018EvalDate: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INC (Continued) S124442128 TC6926581.2s Page 599 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 978) 649-3300,Affiliation Phone: 01879AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: MAAffiliationState: TyngsboroAffiliationCity: 400 Business ParkDriveAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401-7328AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 3485 EMPRESSADRIVEAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: BENGTSON, ERICEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: EricBengtsonEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 541-0901,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ThomasTroxelEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: VicePresidentEntityTitle: ThomasTroxelEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INC (Continued)S124442128 TC6926581.2s Page 600 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: JENIKE & JOHANSON, INC (Continued) S124442128 Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: K ERICBENGTSONOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: JENIKE & JOHANSONINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: KWHITE@JENIKE.COMContactEmail: 000-000-0000ContactFax: 805-541-4680ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADRContactAddress: K ERICBENGTSONContactName: CAL000060118EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADRHandlerAddress: JENIKE & JOHANSONINCHandlerName: 19930729DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1045 ft. Site 11 of 11 in cluster S 0.198 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3485 EMPRESA DR CAL000060118 S167 RCRA NonGen / NLRJENIKE & JOHANSON INC 1024789135 TC6926581.2s Page 601 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: K ERICBENGTSONOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 978-649-3300Owner/Operator Telephone: TYNGSBORO, MA 01879-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 400 BUSINESS PARKDROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JENIKE & JOHANSONINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20181001HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: JENIKE & JOHANSON INC (Continued)1024789135 TC6926581.2s Page 602 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: VETERINARYSERVICESNAICSDescription: 54194NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: JENIKE & JOHANSONINCHandlerName: 19930729ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-4680Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3485 EMPRESADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: JENIKE & JOHANSON INC (Continued) 1024789135 NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 1067 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster Z 0.202 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA WSW N/A Z168 PFASWELL01 S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 603 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.9Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 18Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 604 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 53Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 605 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 606 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 607 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 608 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 8.4Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 609 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 TC6926581.2s Page 610 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 44 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000216GeoTrackerURL: 120.66824Longitude: 35.24732Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/16/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.7Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000216-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000216GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520839 120.66836Longitude: 35.24665Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017272RecordId: SLO CITY-CAL ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION-2ProgramElement: 0252ProgramElementCode: FA0001765FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 205 TANK FARMRDAddress: AIRGAS USA, LLC - NOLAName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1079 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster Z 0.204 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 128 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 205 TANK FARM RD N/A Z169 CUPAListingsAIRGASUSA, LLC - NOLA S126222728 TC6926581.2s Page 611 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66836Longitude: 35.24665Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001765RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 11+Program Element: 0764ProgramElementCode: FA0001765FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 205 TANK FARMRDAddress: AIRGAS USA, LLC - NOLAName: 120.66836Longitude: 35.24665Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006566RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0001765FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 205 TANK FARMRDAddress: AIRGAS USA, LLC - NOLAName: AIRGAS USA, LLC - NOLA (Continued) S126222728 NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007828RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 5-10ProgramElement: 0763ProgramElementCode: FA0005223FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 203GRANADAAddress: BORDEN PRECISION PRODUCTS, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007829RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005223FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 203GRANADAAddress: BORDEN PRECISION PRODUCTS, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1093 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster X 0.207 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW HAZNET203GRANADADR N/A X170 CUPAListingsBORDENCNCFABRICATION S113051844 TC6926581.2s Page 612 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 8WasteQuantity: 0.0333QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D001RCRACode: 741 - Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/lWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 99801050ManifestID: 20001114ReceiptDate: 1/12/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001110ShipmentDate: CAL000078446GenEPAID: 2000Year: Additional Info: 0.0333Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 741 - Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./LCAWasteCode: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAL000078446Gepaid: 2000Year: 203 GRANADADRMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055415504Telephone: CHARLES BORDENOWNERContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 203 GRANADADRAddress: BORDEN CNCFABRICATIONName: HAZNET: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007830RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005223FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 203GRANADAAddress: BORDEN PRECISION PRODUCTS, INCName: BORDEN CNC FABRICATION (Continued) S113051844 TC6926581.2s Page 613 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934010000FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 203 GRANADADRFacilityAddress: BORDEN CNCFABRICATIONFacilityName: 2003-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 1993-07-22 00:00:00IssuedEPAIDDate: Forging andStampingNAICSDescription: 3321NAICSCode: 2002-03-14 16:36:27.000CreateDate: CAL000078446EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 203 GRANADADRContactAddress: CHARLES BORDENOWNERContactName: ATASCADERO, CA934220000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 13550 OLD MORROROADOwnerAddress: CHARLES RBORDENOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 203 GRANADADRMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 10/23/2003LastActDate: 07/22/1993CreateDate: 06/30/2003InactiveDate: CAL000078446EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 203 GRANADADRAddress: BORDEN CNCFABRICATIONName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: BORDEN CNC FABRICATION (Continued) S113051844 NotreportedContactFax: 805-781-3175ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 712 FIEROLNContactAddress: LARRYJOHNSTONContactName: CAP000165191EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 712 FIEROLNHandlerAddress: LUXURY LIGHTING LARRYJOHNSTONHandlerName: 20050819DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1102 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster AA 0.209 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 712 FIERO LN CAP000165191 AA171 RCRA NonGen / NLRLUXURYLIGHTINGLARRYJOHNSTON 1008402358 TC6926581.2s Page 614 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: LARRYJOHNSTONOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: LARRYJOHNSTONOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 712 FIEROLNMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: LUXURY LIGHTING LARRY JOHNSTON (Continued)1008402358 TC6926581.2s Page 615 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: LUXURY LIGHTING LARRYJOHNSTONHandlerName: 20050819ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 712 FIEROLNOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19900101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: LARRYJOHNSTONOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19900101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: LARRYJOHNSTONOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: SILVERWasteDescription: D011WasteCode: SELENIUMWasteDescription: D010WasteCode: CORROSIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D002WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20060217HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: LUXURY LIGHTING LARRY JOHNSTON (Continued) 1008402358 TC6926581.2s Page 616 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: SHEET METAL WORKMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 332322NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: LUXURY LIGHTING LARRY JOHNSTON (Continued) 1008402358 120.64507Longitude: 35.24575Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008525RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0005543FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 712 FIEROLNAddress: ALL ABOUTPRODUCEName: 120.64507Longitude: 35.24575Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008526RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0005543FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 712 FIEROLNAddress: ALL ABOUTPRODUCEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1102 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster AA 0.209 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 712 FIERO LN N/A AA172 CUPAListingsALLABOUTPRODUCE S117845207 TC6926581.2s Page 617 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011084RecordId: CUPA FINE - HAZWASTEGENProgramElement: 1135ProgramElementCode: FA0005259FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 712 FIERO LN28Address: LUXURYLIGHTINGName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007883RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0005259FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 712 FIERO LN28Address: LUXURYLIGHTINGName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007884RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0005259FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 712 FIERO LN28Address: LUXURYLIGHTINGName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1102 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster AA 0.209 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 712 FIERO LN 28 N/A AA173 CUPAListingsLUXURYLIGHTING S117845185 1087 SANTA ROSASTContactAddress: PHILLIP DACRIContactName: CAR000182220EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4398 SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: FILBINPROPERTYHandlerName: 20070306DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 1123 ft.HWTSSite1of3inclusterAB 0.213 mi.NPDES Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SE SWF/LF4398SANTAFERD CAR000182220 AB174 RCRA-SQGFILBINPROPERTY 1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 618 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: CountyOperatorType: CNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: JAMESFILBINOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 1087 SANTA ROSASTMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-781-5200ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 619 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator City,State,Zip: NotreportedOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20060606DateBecameCurrent: CountyLegalStatus: CNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYLETHYLWasteDescription: F005WasteCode: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWasteDescription: F003WasteCode: LEADWasteDescription: D008WasteCode: CORROSIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D002WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20070402HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 620 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAbsorbedOn: NoIsFinancialAssurancesResponsible: NoIsSiteInertDebrisEngineeredFill: NoIsClosedIllegalAbandoned: YesIsArchived: CandiceHoughtonPointofContact: 40-AA-0041SWISNumber: 40-AA-0041FacilityID: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4398 SANTA FEROADAddress: JIM FILBINAGGREGATESName: SWF/LF (SWIS): No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: MATERIALS RECOVERYFACILITIESNAICSDescription: 56292NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: FILBINPROPERTYHandlerName: 20070306ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93405Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1351 ROYALWAYOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 19750101DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: JAMESFILBINOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 621 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Inert Debris Type A ProcessingOperationActivity: Jim FilbinAggregatesSiteName: 40-AA-0041SWISNumber: Waste: 805) 781-5200ContactPhone: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactName: NotreportedStartedOn: YesIsArchived: 120.65185Longitude: 35.23818Latitude: UnpermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: Non-DisposalOnlySiteType: CleanClosedSiteOperationalStatus: Jim FilbinAggregatesSiteName: 93408OwnerZip: CAOwnerState: San LuisObispoOwnerCity: Department of General Services GovernmentCenterOwnerAddress: County Of San LuisObispoOwner: 40-AA-0041SWISNumber: Owner: 93401OperatorZip: CAOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: James P. Filbin 4398 Santa FeRoadStreetAddress: 805) 543-1383ContactPhone: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactName: NotreportedStartedOn: Jim FilbinAggregatesOperator: YesIsArchived: 120.65185Longitude: 35.23818Latitude: UnpermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: Non-DisposalOnlySiteType: CleanClosedSiteOperationalStatus: Jim FilbinAggregatesSiteName: 40-AA-0041SWISNumber: Operator: UnpermittedRegulationStatus: Waste Permitting, Compliance and MitigationDivisionEnforcingAgencyDepartment: Department of Resources Recycling andRecoveryEnforcingAgencyLegalName: Reporting Agency Department: County of San LuisObispoReportingAgencyLegalName: San LuisObispoLocalGovernment: CentralCoastSWRCBRegion: San LuisObispoARBDistrict: NotreportedEPAFederalRegistryID: NotreportedClosedIllegalAbandonedCategory: NotreportedAbsorbedBy: CleanClosedOperationalStatus: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 622 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000182220Gepaid: 2007Year: 0.225Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 181 - Other inorganic solidwasteCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAR000182220Gepaid: 2007Year: 1.675Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteDisposalMethod: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000182220Gepaid: 2007Year: 1.5Tons: Disposal Method: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000182220Gepaid: 2007Year: 0.495Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAR000182220Gepaid: 2007Year: 1087 SANTA ROSA ST CO CNTY OF SANLMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8057815218Telephone: P D’ACRI/AIRPT REAL PROPAGENTContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4398 SANTA FERDAddress: FILBINPROPERTYName: HAZNET: Solid WasteOperationActivityClassification: Transfer/ProcessingActivityCategory: UnpermittedActivityRegulatoryStatus: CleanClosedActivityOperationalStatus: YesActivityIsArchived: CandiceHoughtonPointofContact: Non-DisposalOnlySiteType: UnpermittedSiteRegulatoryStatus: CleanClosedSiteOperationalStatus: YesSiteIsArchived: InertWasteType: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 623 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.495QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENV SERVICESINCTransName: MAD039322250TransEPAID: 001126902FLEManifestID: 20070802ReceiptDate: 11/6/2007 18:30:22CreationDate: 20070727ShipmentDate: CAR000182220GenEPAID: 2007Year: Additional Info: 0.075Tons: H061 - Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At AnotherSiteDisposalMethod: 214 - Unspecified solventmixtureCAWasteCode: CAD008364432TSDEPAID: CAR000182220Gepaid: 2007Year: 0.08816Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 731 - Liquids with polychloronated biphenyls >= 50 Mg./LCAWasteCode: WAD991281767TSDEPAID: CAR000182220Gepaid: 2007Year: 0.05Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 624 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D002RCRACode: 123 - Unspecified alkalinesolutionWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D002RCRACode: 551 - Laboratory waste chemicals 561 Detergent andsoapWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 120WasteQuantity: 0.06QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 625 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.05QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D009RCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 500WasteQuantity: 0.25QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D002RCRACode: 551 - Laboratory waste chemicals 561 Detergent andsoapWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 626 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 1200WasteQuantity: 0.6QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 2000WasteQuantity: 1QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D008RCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 627 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93403City,State,Zip: 4398 SANTA FERDAddress: FILBINSTOCKPILEName: NPDES: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 3200WasteQuantity: 1.6QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: 000499243JJKManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: NotreportedCreationDate: 20070413ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 250WasteQuantity: 0.125QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: RHO CHEMCORPORATIONTransName: CAD008364432TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCINGINCTransName: CAR000177527TransEPAID: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 TC6926581.2s Page 628 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 903-5 AIRPORT DRIVE CO OF SN LUISOContactAddress: P D’ACRI/AIRPT REAL PROPAGENTContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 1087 SANTA ROSA ST CO CNTY OF SANLOwnerAddress: FILBINPROPERTYOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 1087 SANTA ROSA ST CO CNTY OF SANLMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 04/23/2009LastActDate: 03/27/2007CreateDate: 06/30/2008InactiveDate: CAR000182220EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4398 SANTA FERDAddress: FILBINPROPERTYName: HWTS: 93403OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 1087 Santa RosaStOperatorAddress: Dept of GeneralServicesOperatorName: 07/16/2007StatusDate: ReturnedStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: ConstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedWDID: FILBIN PROPERTY (Continued)1010314116 NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011283RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (6+ WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1129ProgramElementCode: FA0007273FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4398 SANTE FERDAddress: FILBIN ILLEGALLANDFILLName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1123 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster AB 0.213 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE 4398 SANTE FE RD N/A AB175 CUPAListingsFILBINILLEGALLANDFILL S117845581 TC6926581.2s Page 629 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.65248Longitude: 35.23843Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011236RecordId: CUPA FINE - HAZWASTEGENProgramElement: 1135ProgramElementCode: FA0007273FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4398 SANTE FERDAddress: FILBIN ILLEGALLANDFILLName: 120.65248Longitude: 35.23843Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: FILBIN ILLEGAL LANDFILL (Continued) S117845581 NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: NOTREQUIREDOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: M EHARTWELLOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESADRMailingAddress: 5StateDistrict: CAStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: OtherLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-544-0577ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3473 EMPRESADRContactAddress: ENVIRONMENTALMANAGERContactName: CAD981386584EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3473 EMPRESADRHandlerAddress: OTIS AUTOBODYHandlerName: 19860211DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 1134 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster AC 0.215 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3473 EMPRESA DR CAD981386584 AC176 RCRA-SQGOTISAUTOBODY 1000373853 TC6926581.2s Page 630 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20020627HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: OTIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1000373853 TC6926581.2s Page 631 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: OTIS AUTOBODYHandlerName: 19860211ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: M EHARTWELLOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: OTIS AUTO BODY (Continued)1000373853 CAC003029412EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-8160HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4378 OLD SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: EARTH SYSTEMSPACIFICHandlerName: 20190814DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1136 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster V 0.215 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 146 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE 4378 OLD SANTA FE RD CAC003029412 V177 RCRA NonGen / NLREARTHSYSTEMSPACIFIC 1025849349 TC6926581.2s Page 632 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: TIMCONROYOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: EARTH SYSTEMSPACIFICOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-8160MailingCity,State,Zip: 4378 OLD SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: TCONROY@EARTHSYSTEMS.COMContactEmail: 805-544-1786ContactFax: 805-544-3276ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-8160ContactCity,State,Zip: 4378 OLD SANTA FERDContactAddress: TIMCONROYContactName: EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC (Continued)1025849349 TC6926581.2s Page 633 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: EARTH SYSTEMSPACIFICHandlerName: 20190814ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-3276Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-8160Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4378 OLD SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: EARTH SYSTEMSPACIFICOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-3276Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-8160Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4378 OLD SANTA FERDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: TIMCONROYOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190910HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC (Continued)1025849349 TC6926581.2s Page 634 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ENGINEERINGSERVICESNAICSDescription: 54133NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC (Continued) 1025849349 PR0006835RecordId: AGT ANNUAL TANKPERMITProgramElement: 1201ProgramElementCode: FA0002287FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 SANTA FERDAddress: CB & I CONSTRUCTORS, INCName: 120.65093Longitude: 35.23869Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002287RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0002287FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 SANTA FERDAddress: CB & I CONSTRUCTORS, INCName: 120.65093Longitude: 35.23869Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001758RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 11+ HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0728ProgramElementCode: FA0002287FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4388 SANTA FERDAddress: CB & I CONSTRUCTORS, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1151 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster AB 0.218 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE 4388 SANTA FE RD N/A AB178 CUPAListingsCB & I CONSTRUCTORS, INC S122353854 TC6926581.2s Page 635 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.65093Longitude: 35.23869Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: CB & I CONSTRUCTORS, INC (Continued) S122353854 NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/8/2021Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 430Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 1152 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster V 0.218 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 146 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SE N/A V179 PFASWELL01 S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 636 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/8/2021Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 637 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 120Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/8/2021Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: HFPA-DAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 638 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 100Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 639 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 360Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 640 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3.4Value: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 641 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 642 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000753GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/26/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000753-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 TC6926581.2s Page 643 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000753GeoTrackerURL: 120.650166Longitude: 35.239777Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520824 BILL@ALLTECHSERVICES.COMContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017520City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 202 TANK FARMRDAddress: ALLTECH SERVICESINCName: HAZNET: 120.66870Longitude: 35.24793Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002347RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0002347FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARMRDAddress: FERRELL’S AUTOREPAIRName: 120.66870Longitude: 35.24793Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006889RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0002347FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARMRDAddress: FERRELL’S AUTOREPAIRName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10439671CERSID: 169770SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD STEAAddress: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICECENTERName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 1170 ft.HWTSSite3of8inclusterZ 0.222 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CUPAListings202TANKFARMRD N/A Z180 CERS HAZWASTEALLTECHSERVICESINC S113158001 TC6926581.2s Page 644 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.22935QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: F001RCRACode: 741 - Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/lWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NVD980895338TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: NVD980895338TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 22680599ManifestID: 20030829ReceiptDate: 7/29/2004 15:04:11CreationDate: 20030730ShipmentDate: CAL000195944GenEPAID: 2003Year: Additional Info: 0.126Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: percent 134 - Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than10CAWasteCode: CAD982446858TSDEPAID: CAL000195944Gepaid: 1999Year: 0.6672Tons: D99 - Disposal, OtherDisposalMethod: 741 - Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./LCAWasteCode: CAD059494310TSDEPAID: CAL000195944Gepaid: 2000Year: 0.22935Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposalMethod: 741 - Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./LCAWasteCode: NVD980895338TSDEPAID: CAL000195944Gepaid: 2003Year: 202 TANK FARM RD STEB2MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8054480733Telephone: ALLTECH SERVICES INC (Continued) S113158001 TC6926581.2s Page 645 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.126QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982446858TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982446858TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 98737239ManifestID: 19990728ReceiptDate: 9/21/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990728ShipmentDate: CAL000195944GenEPAID: 1999Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 160WasteQuantity: 0.6672QuantityTons: D99 - Disposal, OtherMethCode: F002RCRACode: 741 - Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/lWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD059494310TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: SCR000074591Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 99479099ManifestID: 20001229ReceiptDate: 3/22/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001213ShipmentDate: CAL000195944GenEPAID: 2000Year: ALLTECH SERVICES INC (Continued)S113158001 TC6926581.2s Page 646 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: and submitted to "EZ Submit Po A Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been completedelectronicallyEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-29-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Submit Portal". No violation HMBP has been updated for CY 2018 and submitted electronically via "EZEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-19-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Please call Pam Moore at 781- Facility now qualifies to prepare a hazardous materials business plan.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-15-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically. HazMat Business Plan has been updated for CY 2019 andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-11-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: line via the "E Z Submit Portal" Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated and submittedonEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-04-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10439671CERSID: 169770SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD STEAAddress: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICECENTERName: ALLTECH SERVICES INC (Continued) S113158001 TC6926581.2s Page 647 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 202 TANKFARMAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: WAGNER, CHARLESEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 202A Tank FarmRdAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: WAGNER, CHARLESEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 202 TANK FARM RD STEAAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICECENTEREntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: OwnerEntityTitle: CharlesWagnerEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: ALLTECH SERVICES INC (Continued)S113158001 TC6926581.2s Page 648 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 202 TANK FARMRDFacilityAddress: ALLTECH SERVICESINCFacilityName: 2008-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 1999-03-08 00:00:00IssuedEPAIDDate: Plumbing, Heating, and Air-ConditioningContractorsNAICSDescription: 23511NAICSCode: 2004-10-20 10:23:57.043CreateDate: CAL000195944EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017520City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 202 TANK FARM RD STEH2ContactAddress: BILL@ALLTECHSERVICES.COMContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017520OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 202 TANK FARM RD STEH2OwnerAddress: WILLIAMALLEEOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017520MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 202 TANK FARM RD STEB2MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 05/12/2009LastActDate: 03/08/1999CreateDate: 06/30/2008InactiveDate: CAL000195944EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017520City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 202 TANK FARMRDAddress: ALLTECH SERVICESINCName: HWTS: 805) 541-9472,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: HAZARDOUS MATERIALSCOMPLIANCEEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CharlesWagnerEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 541-9472,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: ALLTECH SERVICES INC (Continued)S113158001 TC6926581.2s Page 649 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934017520FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: ALLTECH SERVICES INC (Continued) S113158001 120.66848Longitude: 35.24738Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010362RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0008328FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD STEAAddress: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICECENTERName: 120.66848Longitude: 35.24738Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0013949RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0008328FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD STEAAddress: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICECENTERName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1170 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster Z 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 202 TANK FARM RD STE A N/A Z181 CUPAListingsWAGNERSIMPORTSERVICECENTER S103955353 NotreportedContactFax: 805-542-0181ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 202B TANK FARMRDContactAddress: ENVIRONMENTALMANAGERContactName: CAD982495772EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 202B TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: C S SINCHandlerName: 19920302DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1170 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster Z 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 202B TANK FARM RD CAD982495772 Z182 RCRA NonGen / NLRCSSINC 1000455677 TC6926581.2s Page 650 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: NOTREQUIREDOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: DAVEMARTINDALEOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: 5StateDistrict: CAStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: C S S INC (Continued)1000455677 TC6926581.2s Page 651 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: C S SINCHandlerName: 19920302ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: DAVEMARTINDALEOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20000915HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: C S S INC (Continued)1000455677 TC6926581.2s Page 652 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: No NAICS CodesFoundNAICSCodes: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: C S S INC (Continued)1000455677 YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: RAYSMOOTOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: RENTAL DEPOTINCOwnerName: MONTEREY, CA 93940-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 2200 DEL MONTEAVEMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: RSMOOT@RENTALDEPOTCA.COMContactEmail: 805-549-0577ContactFax: 805-549-0311ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD STEH1ContactAddress: RAYSMOOTContactName: CAL000379575EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7529HandlerCity,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD STEH1HandlerAddress: RENTAL DEPOTINCHandlerName: 20121106DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1170 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster Z 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 202 TANK FARM RD STE H1 CAL000379575 Z183 RCRA NonGen / NLRRENTALDEPOTINC 1024836386 TC6926581.2s Page 653 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-549-0311Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD STEH1Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: RAYSMOOTOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: RENTAL DEPOT INC (Continued)1024836386 TC6926581.2s Page 654 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: OTHER PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD GOODS REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 81149NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: RENTAL DEPOTINCHandlerName: 20121106ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 831-642-9118Owner/Operator Telephone: MONTEREY, CA93940Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2200 DEL MONTEAVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: RENTAL DEPOTINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: RENTAL DEPOT INC (Continued)1024836386 NotreportedRPPhone: NotreportedRPContact: NotreportedResponsibleParty: NotreportedRBCaseIn: NotreportedDiscovered: NotreportedEnteredIntoDatabase: S313RegionalBoardCase#: NotreportedLeakSiteCrossStreet: 3Region: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 202-275 TANK FARMROADAddress: TANK FARM RD MTBE SOURCEINVESTIGATIONName: SLIC REG 3: 1170 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster Z 0.222 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93041 WSW CERS HAZWASTE202-275 TANK FARM ROAD N/A Z184 CPS-SLICTANKFARMRDMTBESOURCEINVESTIGATION S106455255 TC6926581.2s Page 655 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 61290SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD H-1Address: RENTAL DEPOT, INCName: CERS: 120.66851Longitude: 35.24738Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015080RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0008966FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD H-1Address: RENTAL DEPOT, INCName: 120.66851Longitude: 35.24738Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015546RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0008966FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD H-1Address: RENTAL DEPOT, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438711CERSID: 61290SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARM RD H-1Address: RENTAL DEPOT, INCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: NotreportedPCA: NoCaseTypeOtherGrndWtr: NoCaseTypeDrinkingWaterAqfr: YesCaseTypeDrinkinWaterWell: NoCaseTypeSurfaceWater: NoCaseTypeSoilImpacted: NoCaseTypeUndetermined: Drinking water wells have beenaffectedCaseType: Preliminary Site AssessmentUnderwayFacilityStatus: SLICProgramType: RegionalBoardLeadAgency: 25-Jun-02DateFirstReported: NotreportedRPCity,St,Zip: NotreportedRPAddress: NotreportedRPNumber: TANK FARM RD MTBE SOURCE INVESTIGATION (Continued)S106455255 TC6926581.2s Page 656 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEntityTitle: DarrenStameyEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-16-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Portal". HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 and submitted via "E ZSubmitEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-28-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Portal". HMBP to be updated and submitted electronically via "EZSubmitEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 01-22-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: hazardous waste pick-up to mbl Items marked N/A not reviewed during inspection. Send copy oflastEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 07-28-2021EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10438711CERSID: TANK FARM RD MTBE SOURCE INVESTIGATION (Continued) S106455255 TC6926581.2s Page 657 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 202 TANK FARM RD H-1AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 549-0311,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 202 TANKFARMAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: RENTAL DEPOT, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 202 Tank Farm Rd.Affiliation Address: NotreportedEntityTitle: DarrenStameyEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DarrenStameyEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: RENTAL DEPOT, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 549-0311,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: TANK FARM RD MTBE SOURCE INVESTIGATION (Continued)S106455255 TC6926581.2s Page 658 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: BranchManagerEntityTitle: DarrenStameyEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: TANK FARM RD MTBE SOURCE INVESTIGATION (Continued) S106455255 NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: CHARLESWAGNEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: CHARLESWAGNEROwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7520MailingCity,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARMRDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: WAGNERSIMPORT@GMAIL.COMContactEmail: 000-000-0000ContactFax: 805-541-9472ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARMRDContactAddress: CHARLESWAGNERContactName: CAL000349934EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7520HandlerCity,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARMRDHandlerAddress: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICECENTERHandlerName: 20100209DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1170 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster Z 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 202 TANK FARM RD CAL000349934 Z185 RCRA NonGen / NLRWAGNERSIMPORTSERVICECENTER 1024825037 TC6926581.2s Page 659 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9472Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARMRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CHARLESWAGNEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICE CENTER (Continued)1024825037 TC6926581.2s Page 660 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICECENTERHandlerName: 20100209ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-541-9472Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7520Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 202 TANK FARMRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CHARLESWAGNEROwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICE CENTER (Continued) 1024825037 NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-543-0414ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3563 EMPLEOSTContactAddress: STEPHENCHAMPEAUContactName: CAD981627359EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3563 EMPLEOSTHandlerAddress: HIBSHMANCORPHandlerName: 19920813DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 1173 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster AD 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW FINDS3563EMPLEOST CAD981627359 AD186 RCRA-SQGHIBSHMANCORP 1000381423 TC6926581.2s Page 661 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: NOTREQUIREDOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: HIBSHMAN OPTICALCORPOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3563 EMPLEOSTMailingAddress: 5StateDistrict: CAStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: OtherLandType: 09EPARegion: HIBSHMAN CORP (Continued)1000381423 TC6926581.2s Page 662 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 334516NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: HIBSHMANCORPHandlerName: 19920813ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 702-893-9400Owner/Operator Telephone: LAS VEGAS, NV89119Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2001 E FLAMINGO RD STE1005Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: HIBSHMAN OPTICALCORPOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20020627HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: HIBSHMAN CORP (Continued)1000381423 TC6926581.2s Page 663 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3563 EMPLEOSTAddress: HIBSHMANCORPName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002729904DFRURL: 110002729904RegistryID: 1000381423Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002729904RegistryID: FINDS: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ANALYTICAL LABORATORY INSTRUMENTMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: HIBSHMAN CORP (Continued)1000381423 NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-544-4881ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRContactAddress: VASANTDOBARIAContactName: CAD981424443EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRHandlerAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSINCHandlerName: 19980210DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 1174 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster AD 0.222 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 FINDSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW ENVIROSTOR189GRANADADR CAD981424443 AD187 RCRA-SQGPACIFICWESTCIRCUITSINC 1000250666 TC6926581.2s Page 664 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: NOTREQUIREDOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: PACIFIC COAST CIRCUITSINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS INC (Continued)1000250666 TC6926581.2s Page 665 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-4881Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PACIFIC COAST CIRCUITSINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC, AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON 2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS, EXCEPTWasteDescription: F006WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20060905HandlerDateofLastChange: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS INC (Continued) 1000250666 TC6926581.2s Page 666 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PACIFIC COAST CIRCUITSINCHandlerName: 19900329ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Large QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSINCHandlerName: 19980210ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSINCHandlerName: 19860625ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSINCHandlerName: 19980210ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-4881Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: PACIFIC COAST CIRCUITSINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS INC (Continued)1000250666 TC6926581.2s Page 667 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102285AliasName: EPA IdentificationNumberAliasType: CAL000196896AliasName: AlternateNameAliasType: CAN000903208AliasName: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialDescription: NONESPECIFIEDConfirmedCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6685Longitude: 35.25072Latitude: NotreportedFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: NotreportedSpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: DylanClarkSupervisor: PragyaPandeyProgramManager: NONESPECIFIEDLeadAgency: NONESPECIFIEDRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: NotreportedAcres: TieredPermitSiteTypeDetailed: TieredPermitSiteType: 600891SiteCode: 05/08/2001StatusDate: No FurtherActionStatus: 71002836FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRIVEAddress: PACIFIC WESTCIRCUITSName: ENVIROSTOR: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: BARE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 334412NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS INC (Continued) 1000250666 TC6926581.2s Page 668 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/09/2001CompletedDate: ConsentAgreementCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 10/09/2001CompletedDate: ConsentAgreementCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 07/27/1999CompletedDate: Phase IVerificationCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 07/08/2004CompletedDate: No Further ActionLetterCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 07/08/2004CompletedDate: Acknowledgement ofSatisfactionCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 07/08/2004CompletedDate: Corrective Action CompletionDeterminationCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 06/17/2016CompletedDate: Phase1CompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 05/08/2001CompletedDate: Phase1CompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 07/08/2004CompletedDate: Preliminary Endangerment AssessmentReportCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 71002836AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 600891AliasName: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS INC (Continued) 1000250666 TC6926581.2s Page 669 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSINCName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002701229DFRURL: 110002701229RegistryID: 1000250666Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002701229RegistryID: FINDS: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: NotreportedComments: 04/16/2001CompletedDate: Phase IVerificationCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS INC (Continued) 1000250666 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008132RecordId: SLO CITY - PERMIT BYRULEProgramElement: 0450ProgramElementCode: FA0005092FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1174 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster AD 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW HAZNET189GRANADADR N/A AD188 CUPAListingsPACIFICWESTCIRCUITS, INC S113123678 TC6926581.2s Page 670 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007448RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005092FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007447RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 11+Program Element: 0764ProgramElementCode: FA0005092FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007449RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005092FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008301RecordId: SLO CITY - CONDITIONALLYAUTHORIZEDProgramElement: 0550ProgramElementCode: FA0005092FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INC (Continued)S113123678 TC6926581.2s Page 671 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 791 - Liquids with pH < 2 792 Liquids with pH < 2 withmetalsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESLLCTransName: AZD081705402TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ECOLOGY CONTROLINDUSTRIESTransName: CAD982030173TransEPAID: 25174906ManifestID: 20060828ReceiptDate: 11/21/2006 18:30:08CreationDate: 20060811ShipmentDate: CAL000263265GenEPAID: 2006Year: Additional Info: 0.22935Tons: T03 - Treatment, IncinerationDisposalMethod: 791 - Liquids with pH <= 2CAWasteCode: AZD081705402TSDEPAID: CAL000263265Gepaid: 2006Year: 67.424Tons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillDisposalMethod: 181 - Other inorganic solidwasteCAWasteCode: NVT330010000TSDEPAID: CAL000263265Gepaid: 2006Year: 33.712Tons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillDisposalMethod: CA Waste Code: NVT330010000TSDEPAID: CAL000263265Gepaid: 2006Year: 8.69445Tons: T01 - Treatment, TankDisposalMethod: 791 - Liquids with pH <= 2CAWasteCode: AZD081705402TSDEPAID: CAL000263265Gepaid: 2006Year: 189 GRANADADRMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055444881Telephone: TERRYKEARNEYContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSLLCName: HAZNET: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INC (Continued) S113123678 TC6926581.2s Page 672 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 40WasteQuantity: 33.712QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYINCORPORATEDTransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ECOLOGY CONTROLINDUSTRIESTransName: CAD982030173TransEPAID: 25175172ManifestID: 20060814ReceiptDate: 9/27/2006 18:33:49CreationDate: 20060811ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 2030WasteQuantity: 8.4651QuantityTons: T01 - Treatment, TankMethCode: D002RCRACode: 791 - Liquids with pH < 2 792 Liquids with pH < 2 withmetalsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESLLCTransName: AZD081705402TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ECOLOGY CONTROLINDUSTRIESTransName: CAD982030173TransEPAID: 25174906ManifestID: 20060828ReceiptDate: 11/21/2006 18:30:08CreationDate: 20060811ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.22935QuantityTons: T01 - Treatment, TankMethCode: D001RCRACode: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INC (Continued)S113123678 TC6926581.2s Page 673 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ECOLOGY CONTROLINDUSTRIESTransName: CAD982030173TransEPAID: 24713021ManifestID: 20060316ReceiptDate: 7/14/2006 18:30:33CreationDate: 20060315ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 40WasteQuantity: 33.712QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYINCORPORATEDTransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ECOLOGY CONTROLINDUSTRIESTransName: CAD982030173TransEPAID: 24713123ManifestID: 20060517ReceiptDate: 8/24/2006 18:31:31CreationDate: 20060516ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.22935QuantityTons: T03 - Treatment, IncinerationMethCode: D001RCRACode: 791 - Liquids with pH < 2 792 Liquids with pH < 2 withmetalsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESLLCTransName: AZD081705402TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: ECOLOGY CONTROLINDUSTRIESTransName: CAD982030173TransEPAID: 25174906ManifestID: 20060828ReceiptDate: 11/21/2006 18:30:08CreationDate: 20060811ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INC (Continued)S113123678 TC6926581.2s Page 674 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 189 GRANADADRFacilityAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSLLCFacilityName: 2003-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 2002-12-05 16:36:00.28000IssuedEPAIDDate: Bare Printed Circuit BoardManufacturingNAICSDescription: 334412NAICSCode: 2002-12-05 16:36:00.310CreateDate: CAL000263265EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 189 GRANADADRContactAddress: TERRYKEARNEYContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 189 GRANADADROwnerAddress: TERRY KEARNEY & THOMASROBERTSOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 189 GRANADADRMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 10/25/2007LastActDate: 12/05/2002CreateDate: 06/30/2003InactiveDate: CAL000263265EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 189 GRANADADRAddress: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITSLLCName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: YQuantityUnit: 40WasteQuantity: 33.712QuantityTons: D80 - Disposal, LandFillMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 181 - Other inorganic solid wasteOrganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: US ECOLOGYINCORPORATEDTransName: NVT330010000TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: PACIFIC WEST CIRCUITS, INC (Continued) S113123678 TC6926581.2s Page 675 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 35.25323Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007483RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005105FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESA DRBAddress: VINTAGE AUTOBODYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10437328CERSID: 169269SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESA DRBAddress: VINTAGE AUTOBODYName: CERS HAZ WASTE: CAL000089495EPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 93401OwnerZipCode: CAOwnerState: 3453 EMPRESADROwnerMailAddress: 8055447979OwnerPhone: 8055447979OperatorPhone: RobGrantOperatorName: 93401MailingAddressZipCode: CAMailingAddressState: SAN LUISOBISPOMailingAddressCity: 3453 EMPRESA DR, SUITEBMailingAddress: NotreportedFax: 8055447979Phone: VINTAGE AUTOBODYBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: 10437328CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: GRANT, ROBERTOwner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 3453 EMPRESA DRBAddress: VINTAGE AUTOBODYName: AST: 1177 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster AC 0.223 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPAListingsSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 NW CERS HAZWASTE3453EMPRESADRB N/A AC189 ASTVINTAGEAUTOBODY S110743801 TC6926581.2s Page 676 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 and submitted electronically viatheEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-14-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentViolationDivision: on line within two weeks of today’s date (11/21/13. Returned to compliance on 11/15/2013. HM Business Plan to besubmittedViolationNotes: thresholds quantities of 55 gallons/500 lbs/200 cubic feet. Business Plan when storing hazardous materials at or above the Owner/Operator failed to complete and/or submit a HazardousMaterialsViolationDescription: Section(s) 25505(a) HSC 6.95 25505(a) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 11-07-2013ViolationDate: VINTAGE AUTOBODYSiteName: 169269SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10437328CERSID: 169269SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESA DRBAddress: VINTAGE AUTOBODYName: CERS: 120.66659Longitude: 35.25323Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007482RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005105FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESA DRBAddress: VINTAGE AUTOBODYName: 120.66659Longitude: 35.25323Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007481RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005105FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESA DRBAddress: VINTAGE AUTOBODYName: 120.66659Longitude: VINTAGE AUTO BODY (Continued)S110743801 TC6926581.2s Page 677 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-30-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-12-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: record keeping. Annual inspection, no violations. Good employee training programandEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-12-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: EZ Submit Portal. All else ok. Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated and submittedviaEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-06-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: line, no violations noted. Hazardous Materials Business Plan will be updated and submittedonEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 08-17-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: HM Business Plan needs to be submitted on line before end of the year.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 11-07-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: EZ Submit Portal. VINTAGE AUTO BODY (Continued)S110743801 TC6926581.2s Page 678 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: ROBGRANTEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: VINTAGE AUTOBODYEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 544-7979,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: RobGrantEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: OwnerEntityTitle: SAMEEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: program to have consultant ad HMBP has been updated and submitted electronically. EmployeetrainingEvalNotes: VINTAGE AUTO BODY (Continued)S110743801 TC6926581.2s Page 679 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 3453 EmpresaDrAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: RobGrantEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 544-7979,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 3453EMPRESAAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: GRANT, ROBERTEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 3453 EMPRESA DR, SUITEBAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: VINTAGE AUTO BODY (Continued)S110743801 NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: ROB@VINTAGEAB.COMContactEmail: 805-544-7985ContactFax: 805-544-7979ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESADRContactAddress: ROB GRANT JR/OWNERContactName: CAL000089495EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESADRHandlerAddress: VINTAGEAUTOBODYHandlerName: 19930715DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1177 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster AC 0.223 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3453 EMPRESA DR CAL000089495 AC190 RCRA NonGen / NLRVINTAGEAUTOBODY 1024790602 TC6926581.2s Page 680 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: ROB GRANT JR/OWNEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: R.H. GRANT, INCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESADRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: VINTAGE AUTOBODY (Continued)1024790602 TC6926581.2s Page 681 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: AUTOMOTIVE BODY, PAINT, AND INTERIOR REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: VINTAGEAUTOBODYHandlerName: 19930715ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-7979Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: R.H. GRANT, INCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-544-7979Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3453 EMPRESADROwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: ROB GRANT JR/OWNEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: VINTAGE AUTOBODY (Continued)1024790602 TC6926581.2s Page 682 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0018229RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0012731FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 181 SUBURBANRDAddress: ART’SCYCLERYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1179 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster Y 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 181 SUBURBAN RD N/A Y191 CUPAListingsART’S CYCLERY S120703347 PR0010238RecordId: AGT ANNUAL TANKPERMITProgramElement: 1201ProgramElementCode: FA0001757FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4349 SANTA FE RD HG-39Address: SAN LUIS JETCENTERName: 120.64767Longitude: 35.23883Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001757RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0001757FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4349 SANTA FE RD HG-39Address: SAN LUIS JETCENTERName: 120.64767Longitude: 35.23883Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0006562RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0001757FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4349 SANTA FE RD HG-39Address: SAN LUIS JETCENTERName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1201 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster AE 0.227 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 162 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE 4349 SANTA FE RD HG-39 N/A AE192 CUPAListingsSANLUISJETCENTER S117845032 TC6926581.2s Page 683 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.64767Longitude: 35.23883Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: SAN LUIS JET CENTER (Continued)S117845032 NotreportedEPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: NotreportedOwnerCountry: NotreportedOwnerZipCode: NotreportedOwnerState: NotreportedOwnerMailAddress: NotreportedOwnerPhone: NotreportedOperatorPhone: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedMailingAddressZipCode: NotreportedMailingAddressState: NotreportedMailingAddressCity: NotreportedMailingAddress: NotreportedFax: NotreportedPhone: NotreportedBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: NotreportedCERSID: 30000TotalGallons: SAN LUIS JETCENTEROwner: San LuisObispoCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,City/Zip: 4349 SANTAFEAddress: NotreportedName: AST: 1201 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster AE 0.227 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 162 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SE 4349 SANTA FE N/A AE193 AST A100345135 CAL000334615EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4345 SANTA FERDHandlerAddress: HANGAR 46AVIATIONHandlerName: 20080717DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1201 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster AE 0.227 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 162 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SE 4345 SANTA FE RD CAL000334615 AE194 RCRA NonGen / NLRHANGAR46AVIATION 1024820709 TC6926581.2s Page 684 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: MIKEKUNDEOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: MIKEKUNDEOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 4345 SANTA FE RD STE46MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: MIKE@HANGAR46.COMContactEmail: 805-541-9079ContactFax: 805-215-8914ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 4345 SANTA FE RD STE46ContactAddress: MIKEKUNDEContactName: HANGAR 46 AVIATION (Continued)1024820709 TC6926581.2s Page 685 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: HANGAR 46AVIATIONHandlerName: 20080717ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-215-8914Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4345 SANTA FE RD STE46Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: MIKEKUNDEOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-215-8914Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 4345 SANTA FE RD STE46Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: MIKEKUNDEOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: HANGAR 46 AVIATION (Continued)1024820709 TC6926581.2s Page 686 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: JANITORIALSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56172NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: HANGAR 46 AVIATION (Continued)1024820709 NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: KENLOFRANOOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USALLCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESA DR STE150MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: KEN.LOFRANO@IMDEXLIMITED.COMContactEmail: 805-540-2018ContactFax: 805-540-2181ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESA DR STE150ContactAddress: KENLOFRANOContactName: CAL000449800EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESA DR STE150HandlerAddress: IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USALLCHandlerName: 20191009DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1219 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster AC 0.231 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3474 EMPRESA DR STE 150 CAL000449800 AC195 RCRA NonGen / NLRIMDEXTECHNOLOGYUSALLC 1025876664 TC6926581.2s Page 687 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USALLCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20191011HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USA LLC (Continued)1025876664 TC6926581.2s Page 688 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ENGINEERINGSERVICESNAICSDescription: 541330NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USALLCHandlerName: 20191009ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-540-2181Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESA DR STE150Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KENLOFRANOOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-540-2017Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESA DR STE150Owner/Operator Address: IMDEX TECHNOLOGY USA LLC (Continued) 1025876664 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005114FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESADRAddress: OTIS AUTOBODYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1219 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster AC 0.231 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3474 EMPRESA DR N/A AC196 CUPAListingsOTISAUTOBODY S113004414 TC6926581.2s Page 689 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007502RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005114FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESADRAddress: OTIS AUTOBODYName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007501RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005114FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3474 EMPRESADRAddress: OTIS AUTOBODYName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007503RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: OTIS AUTO BODY (Continued)S113004414 FA0004299FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADORDAddress: SAN LUIS TALLOWCOMPANYName: 120.65865Longitude: 35.25347Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007129RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0004299FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADORDAddress: SAN LUIS TALLOWCOMPANYName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1230 ft.CERSSite1of2inclusterAF 0.233 mi.CIWQS Relative: Higher Actual: 143 ft. 1/8-1/4 WDRSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 North EMI445PRADOROAD N/A AF197 CUPAListingsCENTRALCOASTLANDSCAPEPRODUCTS, INC. S113182457 TC6926581.2s Page 690 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.002376ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.003TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 1442SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2513FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2014Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: 0.0025Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.005ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.002376ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.003TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 1442SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2513FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2013Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: EMI: 120.65865Longitude: 35.25347Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008689RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0004299FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADORDAddress: SAN LUIS TALLOWCOMPANYName: 120.65865Longitude: 35.25347Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001753RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC. (Continued)S113182457 TC6926581.2s Page 691 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 1442SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2513FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2017Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: 0.004Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.008ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.003168ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.004TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 1442SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2513FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2016Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: 0.004Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.008ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.003168ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.004TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 1442SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2513FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2015Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: 0.0025Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.005ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC. (Continued)S113182457 TC6926581.2s Page 692 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HISTORICAL - WDRStatus: WDR100035456GlobalID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADORDAddress: SAN LUIS TALLOWCOMPANYName: WDR: 0.008475Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.01695ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.006913566ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.00872925TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 1442SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2513FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2019Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: 0.009Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.018ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.007128ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.009TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 1442SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2513FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2018Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: 0.004Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.015ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.003168ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.008TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC. (Continued)S113182457 TC6926581.2s Page 693 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Waste DischargeRequirementsCERSDescription: 255397CERSID: 347480SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADORDAddress: SAN LUIS TALLOWCOMPANYName: US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110058327877CERSID: 514878SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADOROADAddress: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC.Name: CERS: 120.662261Longitude: 35.254033Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: 3TTWQ: CComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: 0.7DesignFlow: 02/06/2019Expiration/Review Date: 02/06/2004TerminationDate: 02/06/2004EffectiveDate: 02/06/2004AdoptionDate: NotreportedNPDESNumber: 3402013001WDID: 04-0041OrderNumber: WDRRegulatoryMeasureType: HistoricalRegulatoryMeasureStatus: WDRProgram: 3Region: 2077SIC/NAICS: RenderingPlace/Project Type: Po Box 767, San Luis Obispo, CA93406AgencyAddress: San Luis TallowCompanyAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 445 PRADORDAddress: SAN LUIS TALLOWCOMPANYName: CIWQS: CENTRAL COAST LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS, INC. (Continued) S113182457 179 GRANADA #FOURTHContactAddress: ENVIRONMENTALMANAGERContactName: CAD982029472EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 179 GRANADA #4HandlerAddress: KENNETHDUKESHandlerName: 19870717DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1244 ft. 0.236 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW FINDS179GRANADA #4 CAD982029472 198 RCRA NonGen / NLRKENNETHDUKES 1000314150 TC6926581.2s Page 694 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: YesTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: NOTREQUIREDOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: KENNETHDUKESOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: GRANADA #FOURTHMailingAddress: 5StateDistrict: CAStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-541-4588ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: KENNETH DUKES (Continued)1000314150 TC6926581.2s Page 695 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: KENNETHDUKESHandlerName: 19870717ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: KENNETHDUKESOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20000915HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: KENNETH DUKES (Continued)1000314150 TC6926581.2s Page 696 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 179 GRANADA #4Address: KENNETHDUKESName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002782132DFRURL: 110002782132RegistryID: 1000314150Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002782132RegistryID: FINDS: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: No NAICS CodesFoundNAICSCodes: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: KENNETH DUKES (Continued)1000314150 09EPARegion: SENIORSCIENTISTContactTitle: KIRK.HENNING@STANTEC.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-234-0478ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: EMPRESA DRIVE, STE. AContactAddress: KIRKHENNINGContactName: CAP000333765EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE, STE. AHandlerAddress: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.Handler Name: 20220128DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 1252 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster AC 0.237 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE, STE. A CAP000333765 AC199 RCRA-SQGSTANTECCONSULTINGSERVICESINC. 1027095269 TC6926581.2s Page 697 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: YesShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICESINCOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICESINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: EMPRESA DRIVE, STE. AMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. (Continued)1027095269 TC6926581.2s Page 698 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.Handler Name: 20220128ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: KIRK.HENNING@STANTEC.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-234-0478Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE, STE. AOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20220124DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICESINCOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: KIRK.HENNING@STANTEC.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-234-0478Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE, STE. AOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20220124DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICESINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: LEADWasteDescription: D008WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20220131HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. (Continued) 1027095269 TC6926581.2s Page 699 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTINGSERVICESNAICSDescription: 541620NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. (Continued) 1027095269 NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: REENADELGADOOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.Owner Name: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESADRIVEMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: REENA.DELGADO@STANTEC.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-250-2855ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESADRIVEContactAddress: REENADELGADOContactName: CAC003092156EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESADRIVEHandlerAddress: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.Handler Name: 20201110DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1252 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster AC 0.237 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 3437 EMPRESA DRIVE CAC003092156 AC200 RCRA NonGen / NLRSTANTECCONSULTINGSERVICESINC. 1026486010 TC6926581.2s Page 700 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-546-0455Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20201117HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. (Continued)1026486010 TC6926581.2s Page 701 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ENGINEERINGSERVICESNAICSDescription: 54133NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.Handler Name: 20201110ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-250-2855Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3437 EMPRESADRIVEOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: REENADELGADOOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. (Continued) 1026486010 Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007626RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0761ProgramElementCode: FA0005159FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 PRADORDAddress: TIM’S CONCRETEPUMPINGName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1260 ft. Site 1 of 6 in cluster AG 0.239 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 277 PRADO RD N/A AG201 CUPAListingsTIM’S CONCRETE PUMPING S104576088 TC6926581.2s Page 702 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66506Longitude: 35.25382Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007625RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005159FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 PRADORDAddress: TIM’S CONCRETEPUMPINGName: 120.66506Longitude: 35.25382Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007624RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005159FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 277 PRADORDAddress: TIM’S CONCRETEPUMPINGName: 120.66506Longitude: 35.25382Latitude: TIM’S CONCRETE PUMPING (Continued) S104576088 PO BOX1429MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: OFFICE-ADMIN@SANSONECO.COMContactEmail: 805-549-0702ContactFax: 805-549-0667ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406ContactCity,State,Zip: PO BOX1429ContactAddress: MAUREENBURGERContactName: CAL000234874EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-0000HandlerCity,State,Zip: 710-21 FIEROLNHandlerAddress: SANSONE COMPANYINCHandlerName: 20020226DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1265 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster AA 0.240 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 161 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 710-21 FIERO LN CAL000234874 AA202 RCRA NonGen / NLRSANSONECOMPANYINC 1024801915 TC6926581.2s Page 703 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: MAUREENBURGEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: SANSONE COMPANYINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-1429MailingCity,State,Zip: SANSONE COMPANY INC (Continued)1024801915 TC6926581.2s Page 704 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: EXCAVATIONCONTRACTORSNAICSDescription: 23593NAICSCode: SINGLE FAMILY HOUSINGCONSTRUCTIONNAICSDescription: 23321NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: SANSONE COMPANYINCHandlerName: 20020226ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-549-0667Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93406Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX1429Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: MAUREENBURGEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-549-0667Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-1429Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX1429Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: SANSONE COMPANYINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: SANSONE COMPANY INC (Continued) 1024801915 TC6926581.2s Page 705 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: SANSONE COMPANY INC (Continued) 1024801915 NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: BLAIRENGINEERINGOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: BLAIRENGINEERINGOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: ACCOUNTS@BLAIR-ENGINEERING.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 844-598-0770ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14ContactAddress: BLAIRENGINEERINGContactName: CAC002979623EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14HandlerAddress: BLAIRENGINEERINGHandlerName: 20180910DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1265 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster AA 0.240 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 161 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 710 FIERO LANE, #14 CAC002979623 AA203 RCRA NonGen / NLRBLAIRENGINEERING 1024759772 TC6926581.2s Page 706 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 710 FIERO LANE, #14Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: BLAIRENGINEERINGOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 844-598-0770Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: BLAIRENGINEERINGOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20181001HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: BLAIR ENGINEERING (Continued)1024759772 TC6926581.2s Page 707 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PURPOSE MACHINERYMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 333999NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: BLAIRENGINEERINGHandlerName: 20180910ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 844-598-0770Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: BLAIR ENGINEERING (Continued)1024759772 NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: ACCOUNTS@BLAIR-ENGINEERING.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-457-8800ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14ContactAddress: WILEYBLAIRContactName: CAL000441997EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14HandlerAddress: BLAIRENGINEERINGHandlerName: 20181221DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1265 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster AA 0.240 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 161 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 710 FIERO LANE, #14 CAL000441997 AA204 RCRA NonGen / NLRBLAIRENGINEERING 1024873346 TC6926581.2s Page 708 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20190222HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: WILEYBLAIROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: BLAIR ENGINEERING (S-CORP)Owner Name: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: BLAIR ENGINEERING (Continued)1024873346 TC6926581.2s Page 709 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL PURPOSE MACHINERYMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 333999NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: BLAIRENGINEERINGHandlerName: 20181221ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-457-8800Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: WILEYBLAIROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-457-8800Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 710 FIERO LANE, #14Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: BLAIR ENGINEERING (S-CORP)Owner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: BLAIR ENGINEERING (Continued)1024873346 TC6926581.2s Page 710 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: BLAIR ENGINEERING (Continued)1024873346 NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: MATTHEWHAASOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: AMETEKINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 708 FIERO LN STE9MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: MATTHEW.HAAS@AMETEK.COMContactEmail: 805-597-1597ContactFax: 805-595-5477ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 708 FIERO LN STE9ContactAddress: MATTHEWHAASContactName: CAL000390014EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 708 FIERO LN STE9HandlerAddress: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPORATIONHandlerName: 20131008DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1280 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster AA 0.242 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 161 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ESE 708 FIERO LN STE 9 CAL000390014 AA205 RCRA NonGen / NLRCRYSTALENGINEERINGCORPORATION 1024840802 TC6926581.2s Page 711 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 708 FIERO LN STE9Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: MATTHEWHAASOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 610-647-2121Owner/Operator Telephone: BERWYN, PA 19312-1177Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1100 CASSATTRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: AMETEKINCOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: CRYSTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION (Continued)1024840802 TC6926581.2s Page 712 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: DISPLAYING, AND CONTROLLING INDUSTRIAL PROCESS VARIABLES INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING FOR MEASURING,NAICS Description: 334513NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPORATIONHandlerName: 20131008ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-595-5477Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: CRYSTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION (Continued) 1024840802 708 FIERO LANE STE9Address: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPName: CERS: 120.64398Longitude: 35.24395Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015746RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0009410FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403-3033City,State,Zip: 708 FIERO LANE STE9Address: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1280 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster AA 0.242 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 161 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403 ESE CERS708FIEROLANESTE9 N/A AA206 CUPAListingsCRYSTALENGINEERINGCORP S113663238 TC6926581.2s Page 713 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-05-2015EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: haz mat business plan for 2020. Returned to compliance on 06/08/2020. Please review and certifyyourViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 05-27-2020ViolationDate: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPSiteName: 173596SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: THROUGH STATE SITE, CERS. CERTIFICATION OF HMBP IS DUE ANNUALLY BY 3/1 THROUGH, EITHER, SLO EHS PUBLIC PORTAL AT: www.ezsubmitslogov.org, OR MATERIAL BUSINESS PLAN, ELECTRONICALLY, BY 8/23/2015. UPDATE PLAN Returned to compliance on 10/07/2015. UPDATE/CERTIFYHAZARDOUSViolationNotes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and/or electronically submit a business planwhenViolationDescription: Section(s) 25508(d) HSC 6.95 25508(d) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 07-24-2015ViolationDate: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPSiteName: 173596SiteID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthViolationDivision: COMMUNICATION TRAINING TO YOUR INSPECTOR BY 9/25/13. Returned to compliance on 09/16/2013. SUBMIT COPY OF EMPLOYEEHAZARDViolationNotes: appropriate personnel receive initial and annual training. Failure to include provisions in the business plan to ensurethatViolationDescription: Section(s) 25504(c) HSC 6.95 25504(c) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95,Citation: 08-26-2013ViolationDate: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPSiteName: 173596SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10598845CERSID: 173596SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93403City,State,Zip: CRYSTAL ENGINEERING CORP (Continued) S113663238 TC6926581.2s Page 714 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-17-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 08-26-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 05-27-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: EMERGENCY RESPONSE AVAILABLE AT NEXT INSPECTION. GASES. HAVE EMPLOYEE TRAINING RECORDS ON HAZARD COMMUNICATION AND ELECTRONICALLY UPDATE SITE MAP TO INDICATE RELOCATION OFCOMPRESSEDEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 02-04-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 07-24-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: GREAT TRAININGPROGRAMEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-17-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: CRYSTAL ENGINEERING CORP (Continued) S113663238 TC6926581.2s Page 715 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 595-5477,Affiliation Phone: 19312AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: PAAffiliationState: BERWYNAffiliationCity: 1100CASSATTAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AMETEK, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 595-5477,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DavidPorterEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MatthewHaasEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-16-2013EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo County EnvironmentalHealthEvalDivision: HMBP inforeceivedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-08-2020EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CRYSTAL ENGINEERING CORP (Continued)S113663238 TC6926581.2s Page 716 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CRYSTAL ENGINEERINGCORPEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: OperationsEntityTitle: MatthewHaasEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93403AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: PO BOX3033AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93403AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 708 Fiero Lane Suite9AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MatthewHaasEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: CRYSTAL ENGINEERING CORP (Continued) S113663238 NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020639RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0761ProgramElementCode: FA0014188FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 241 PRADORDAddress: TRIBEAUTOName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1291 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster AG 0.245 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW HWTS241PRADORD N/A AG207 CUPAListingsTRIBEAUTO S124948975 TC6926581.2s Page 717 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 241 PRADORDFacilityAddress: TRIBEAUTOMOTIVEFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2019-06-20 15:22:00.08700IssuedEPAIDDate: General AutomotiveRepairNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: 2019-06-20 15:22:00.100CreateDate: CAR000296756EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 241 PRADORDContactAddress: STEPHEN MHAIDETContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 241 PRADORDOwnerAddress: STEPHEN MARCUS HAIDET TRIBEAUTOOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 241 PRADORDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 08/26/2020LastActDate: 06/20/2019CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAR000296756EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 241 PRADORDAddress: TRIBEAUTOMOTIVEName: HWTS: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019661RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0014188FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 241 PRADORDAddress: TRIBEAUTOName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: TRIBE AUTO (Continued)S124948975 TC6926581.2s Page 718 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: STEPHEN MARCUS HAIDET / TRIBEAUTOOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: THE MAUREEN I. DENNIS FAMILYTRUSTOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: PRADOMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Conditionally Exempt Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: PrivateLandType: 09EPARegion: OWNERContactTitle: MARCUS@TRIBEAUTO.COMContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-904-6784ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: PRADOContactAddress: STEPHEN MHAIDETContactName: CAR000296756EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 241PRADOHandlerAddress: TRIBEAUTOMOTIVEHandlerName: 20190618DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-VSQG: 1291 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster AG 0.245 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 241 PRADO CAR000296756 AG208 RCRA-VSQGTRIBEAUTOMOTIVE 1025502216 TC6926581.2s Page 719 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE AND CHLORINATED TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLORETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:Waste Description: F001WasteCode: METHYL ETHYLKETONEWasteDescription: D035WasteCode: LEADWasteDescription: D008WasteCode: CHROMIUMWasteDescription: D007WasteCode: CADMIUMWasteDescription: D006WasteCode: CORROSIVEWASTEWasteDescription: D002WasteCode: IGNITABLEWASTEWasteDescription: D001WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20190620HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: TRIBE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)1025502216 TC6926581.2s Page 720 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation METHANOL (I) (OR) METHYL ALCOHOL (I)Waste Description: U154WasteCode: HYDROFLUORIC ACID (C,T) (OR) HYDROGEN FLUORIDE (C,T)Waste Description: U134WasteCode: METHANE, DICHLORO- (OR) METHYLENECHLORIDEWasteDescription: U080WasteCode: 2-PROPANONE (I) (OR) ACETONE (I)Waste Description: U002WasteCode: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYLETHYLWasteDescription: F005WasteCode: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, AND TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE SOLVENTS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A AND NITROBENZENE; AND THE STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: CRESOLS, CRESYLIC ACID,Waste Description: F004WasteCode: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWasteDescription: F003WasteCode: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F004, AND USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2, CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste Description: F002WasteCode: SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. IN F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED TRIBE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)1025502216 TC6926581.2s Page 721 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoElectronicManifestBroker: NoNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Conditionally Exempt Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: TRIBEAUTOMOTIVEHandlerName: 20190618ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: ROD.BOYER@GMAIL.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 309-483-6088Owner/Operator Telephone: STOCKTON, CA95204Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1060 W MONTEREY AVE.Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: THE MAUREEN I. DENNIS FAMILYTRUSTOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: MARCUS@TRIBEAUTO.COMOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-904-6784Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 241PRADOOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: 20160901DateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: STEPHEN MARCUS HAIDET / TRIBEAUTOOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: BENZENE, DIMETHYL- (I,T) (OR) XYLENE (I)Waste Description: U239WasteCode: ETHENE, TRICHLORO- (OR) TRICHLOROETHYLENEWasteDescription: U228WasteCode: BENZENE, METHYL- (OR) TOLUENEWasteDescription: U220WasteCode: PENTANOL, 4-METHYL- 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (I) (OR) METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (I) (OR)Waste Description: U161WasteCode: 2-BUTANONE (I,T) (OR) METHYL ETHYL KETONE (MEK) (I,T)Waste Description: U159WasteCode: TRIBE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)1025502216 TC6926581.2s Page 722 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVEREPAIRNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: TRIBE AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)1025502216 SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005952FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 241 PRADO RD UNITBAddress: BUS & TRUCKSERVICEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CAL000253703EPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 93401OwnerZipCode: CAOwnerState: 241 PRADO RD UNIT #BOwnerMailAddress: 8054382739OwnerPhone: 8055458400OperatorPhone: jimgalushaOperatorName: 93401MailingAddressZipCode: CAMailingAddressState: SAN LUISOBISPOMailingAddressCity: 241 PRADO RD UNIT #BMailingAddress: 8053645460Fax: 8054382739Phone: SILVERADOSTAGESBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: 10435852CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: SILVERADOSTAGESOwner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 241 PRADO RD UNIT #BAddress: SILVERADOSTAGESName: AST: 1291 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster AG 0.245 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW CUPAListings241PRADORDUNITB N/A AG209 ASTBUS & TRUCK SERVICE S110743941 TC6926581.2s Page 723 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66601Longitude: 35.25378Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0009210RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005952FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 241 PRADO RD UNITBAddress: BUS & TRUCKSERVICEName: 120.66601Longitude: 35.25378Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010363RecordId: BUS & TRUCK SERVICE (Continued) S110743941 NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: AARONLANGMAYEROperatorName: OtherOwnerType: BUS & TRUCKSERVICEOwnerName: PHOENIX, AZ 85009-0000MailingCity,State,Zip: 2239 N BLACK CANYONHWYMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: ALANGMAYER@BUSANDTRUCKSERVICE.COMContactEmail: 805-364-5470ContactFax: 530-318-5598ContactTelephone: PHOENIX, AZ85009ContactCity,State,Zip: 2239 N BLACK CANYONHWYContactAddress: AARONLANGMAYERContactName: CAL000392015EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7309HandlerCity,State,Zip: 241 PRADO RD # BHandlerAddress: BUS & TRUCKSERVICEHandlerName: 20131213DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1291 ft. Site 5 of 6 in cluster AG 0.245 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NW 241 PRADO RD # B CAL000392015 AG210 RCRA NonGen / NLRBUS & TRUCK SERVICE 1024841933 TC6926581.2s Page 724 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OtherLegalStatus: BUS & TRUCKSERVICEOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180906HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: BUS & TRUCK SERVICE (Continued)1024841933 TC6926581.2s Page 725 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: OTHER PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD GOODS REPAIR ANDMAINTENANCENAICSDescription: 81149NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: BUS & TRUCKSERVICEHandlerName: 20131213ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 530-318-5598Owner/Operator Telephone: PHOENIX, AZ85009Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2239 N BLACK CANYONHWYOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: AARONLANGMAYEROwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-438-2765Owner/Operator Telephone: PHOENIX, AZ 85009-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2239 N BLACK CANYONHWYOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: BUS & TRUCK SERVICE (Continued) 1024841933 TC6926581.2s Page 726 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.667475Longitude: 35.253363Latitude: NotreportedCERSID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFPermittingAgency: 600014FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTAddress: KNECHT’SPLUMBINGName: UST: 1299 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster AD 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW 3548 EMPLEO ST N/A AD211 USTKNECHT’S PLUMBING U003971185 60 ZACALANEMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055445118Telephone: GERALD KNECHT-OWNERContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 3548 EMPLEOSTAddress: KNECHTS PLUMBING & HEATINGName: HAZNET: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NotreportedLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: NotreportedTypeofFuel: NotreportedTankUsedfor: NotreportedTankCapacity: NotreportedYearInstalled: NotreportedContainerNum: NotreportedTankNum: NotreportedTotalTanks: NotreportedOwnerCity,St,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress: NotreportedOwnerName: NotreportedTelephone: NotreportedContactName: NotreportedOtherType: NotreportedFacilityType: NotreportedFacilityID: NotreportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002B8EA.pdfURL: 0002B8EAFileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTAddress: KENCHTS PLUMBING AND HEATINGIName: HIST UST: 1299 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster AD 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW HAZNET3548EMPLEOST N/A AD212 HISTUSTKENCHTSPLUMBINGANDHEATINGI S112907215 TC6926581.2s Page 727 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedContactAddress2: 60 ZACALANEContactAddress: GERALD KNECHT-OWNERContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 60 ZACALANEOwnerAddress: GERALDKNECHTOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 60 ZACALANEMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 06/11/2001LastActDate: 07/03/2000CreateDate: 06/11/2001InactiveDate: CAC002249857EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 3548 EMPLEOSTAddress: KNECHTS PLUMBING & HEATINGName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 400WasteQuantity: 1.668QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD003872264TransEPAID: 98524966ManifestID: 20000707ReceiptDate: 9/11/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000706ShipmentDate: CAC002249857GenEPAID: 2000Year: Additional Info: 1.668Tons: R01 - RecyclerDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAT080013352TSDEPAID: CAC002249857Gepaid: 2000Year: KENCHTS PLUMBING AND HEATING I (Continued)S112907215 TC6926581.2s Page 728 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 3548 EMPLEOSTFacilityAddress: ABILITYCENTERFacilityName: 2020-10-19 07:19:07.48000InactiveDate: 2020-07-21 07:19:07.49700IssuedEPAIDDate: Not OtherwiseSpecifiedNAICSDescription: 99999NAICSCode: 2020-07-21 07:19:07.497CreateDate: CAC003075606EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 3548 EMPLEOSTContactAddress: JOHNContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 3548 EMPLEOSTOwnerAddress: JOHNOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 3548 EMPLEOSTMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 07/21/2020LastActDate: 07/21/2020CreateDate: 10/19/2020InactiveDate: CAC003075606EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 3548 EMPLEOSTAddress: ABILITYCENTERName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: KENCHTS PLUMBING AND HEATING I (Continued) S112907215 KNECHT’S PLUMBING & HEATING, IOwnerName: 8055445118Telephone: JACKKNECHTContactName: PLUMBING & HEATINGOtherType: OtherFacilityType: 00000063753FacilityID: STATERegion: NotreportedURL: NotreportedFileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTAddress: KNECHT’S PLUMBING & HEATING, IName: HIST UST: 1299 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster AD 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW CUPAListings3548EMPLEOST N/A AD213 HISTUSTKNECHT’S PLUMBING & HEATING, I S105799401 TC6926581.2s Page 729 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008454RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005520FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3548EMPLEOAddress: ADAPTIVE DRIVINGSYSTEMSName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0008455RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005520FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3548EMPLEOAddress: ADAPTIVE DRIVINGSYSTEMSName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: REGULARTypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00001000TankCapacity: 1984YearInstalled: 001ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0001TotalTanks: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,St,Zip: 3548 EMPLEO ST.Owner Address: KNECHT’S PLUMBING & HEATING, I (Continued) S105799401 NotreportedContactFax: 805-206-8248ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTContactAddress: JOHNDAWSONContactName: CAC003075606EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTHandlerAddress: ABILITYCENTERHandlerName: 20200721DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1299 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster AD 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WNW 3548 EMPLEO ST CAC003075606 AD214 RCRA NonGen / NLRABILITYCENTER 1026470094 TC6926581.2s Page 730 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: JOHNDAWSONOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: JOHNDAWSONOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: HIGGINSWMC@YAHOO.COMContactEmail: ABILITY CENTER (Continued)1026470094 TC6926581.2s Page 731 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: ABILITYCENTERHandlerName: 20200721ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-206-8248Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JOHNDAWSONOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-206-8248Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3548 EMPLEOSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: JOHNDAWSONOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20200814HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: ABILITY CENTER (Continued)1026470094 TC6926581.2s Page 732 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENTSERVICESNAICSDescription: 56299NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: ABILITY CENTER (Continued)1026470094 02-09-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Name/Password obtained. New facilit Hazardous Materials Business Plan is being completed afterUserEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-28-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: database. HazMat Business Plan to be updated for CY 2019 viaelectronicEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-22-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10423741CERSID: 101048SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4115 BROAD STREET, STE B-10Address: CA HIGHWAY PATROL COASTALDIVISIONName: CERS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10423741CERSID: 101048SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4115 BROAD STREET, STE B-10Address: CA HIGHWAY PATROL COASTALDIVISIONName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 1300 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster AH 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 165 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East CERS4115BROADSTREET, STE B-10 N/A AH215 CERS HAZWASTECAHIGHWAYPATROLCOASTALDIVISION S121737050 TC6926581.2s Page 733 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Department of California HighwayPatrolEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 4115 Broad Street, Ste B-10AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 94298-0001AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SacramentoAffiliationCity: PO Box942898AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KarenMejiaEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: ABMA, FacilitiesSectionEntityTitle: KarenMejiaEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: forthcoming. No violations noted. HMBP completed and up to date - submittal for CY 2018 willbeEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: CA HIGHWAY PATROL COASTAL DIVISION (Continued)S121737050 TC6926581.2s Page 734 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 549-3261,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Chief L. M. Maples, Coastal Division #701EntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KarenMejiaEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 544-6529,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 979 Osos Street SuiteB2AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: AlMcWayEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 916) 843-3800,Affiliation Phone: 94298-0001AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SacramentoAffiliationCity: PO Box942898AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: Department of California HighwayPatrolEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: CA HIGHWAY PATROL COASTAL DIVISION (Continued) S121737050 SACRAMENTO, CA 94298-0001ContactCity,State,Zip: PO BOX942898ContactAddress: BETHDEPAOLAContactName: CAL931023658EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7963HandlerCity,State,Zip: 4115 BROAD ST STE B-10HandlerAddress: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 19930412DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1300 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster AH 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 165 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 East 4115 BROAD ST STE B-10 CAL931023658 AH216 RCRA NonGen / NLRCALIFORNIAHIGHWAYPATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SA 1024876235 TC6926581.2s Page 735 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: BETHDEPAOLAOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAYPATROLOwnerName: SACRAMENTO, CA 94298-0001MailingCity,State,Zip: PO BOX942898MailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: EDEPAOLA@CHP.CA.GOVContactEmail: 916-322-3172ContactFax: 916-843-3817ContactTelephone: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued)1024876235 TC6926581.2s Page 736 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 19930412ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 916-843-3800Owner/Operator Telephone: SACRAMENTO, CA 94298-0001Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX942898Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAYPATROLOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 916-843-3817Owner/Operator Telephone: SACRAMENTO, CA 94298-0001Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: PO BOX942898Owner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: BETHDEPAOLAOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180907HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued)1024876235 TC6926581.2s Page 737 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: POLICEPROTECTIONNAICSDescription: 92212NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued) 1024876235 PO BOX942898MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 9168433817Telephone: BethDePaolaContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017963City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4115 BROAD ST STE B-10Address: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUISOBISPOName: HAZNET: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0016237RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0006894FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4115 BROAD ST STE B-10Address: CA HIGHWAY PATROL COASTALDIVISIONName: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Active, exempt frombillingStatus: 04StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0015722RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0006894FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4115 BROAD ST STE B-10Address: CA HIGHWAY PATROL COASTALDIVISIONName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1300 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster AH 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 165 ft. 1/8-1/4 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 East HAZNET4115BROADSTSTEB-10 N/A AH217 CUPAListingsCALIFORNIAHIGHWAYPATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SA S113169556 TC6926581.2s Page 738 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 22882593ManifestID: 20030818ReceiptDate: 7/28/2004 10:45:53CreationDate: 20030811ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.0168QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22530753ManifestID: 20031111ReceiptDate: 8/20/2004 8:27:39CreationDate: 20031103ShipmentDate: CAL931023658GenEPAID: 2003Year: Additional Info: 0.042Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: percent 134 - Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than10CAWasteCode: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL931023658Gepaid: 2002Year: 0.0672Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: percent 134 - Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than10CAWasteCode: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL931023658Gepaid: 2003Year: 0.0336Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: percent 134 - Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than10CAWasteCode: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL931023658Gepaid: 2004Year: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued) S113169556 TC6926581.2s Page 739 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22438464ManifestID: 20030312ReceiptDate: 3/16/2007 18:30:41CreationDate: 20030306ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.0168QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22385413ManifestID: 20030528ReceiptDate: 6/23/2004 9:59:25CreationDate: 20030519ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.0168QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued)S113169556 TC6926581.2s Page 740 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.0168QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22577443ManifestID: 20040202ReceiptDate: 8/19/2004 11:23:00CreationDate: 20040126ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.0168QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23462648ManifestID: 20040426ReceiptDate: 10/14/2004 7:49:48CreationDate: 20040420ShipmentDate: CAL931023658GenEPAID: 2004Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.0168QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued)S113169556 TC6926581.2s Page 741 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.021QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21904731ManifestID: 20020917ReceiptDate: 1/27/2003 18:32:25CreationDate: 20020916ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.021QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 134 - Aqueous solution with <10% total organicresiduesWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 22193443ManifestID: 20021216ReceiptDate: 3/16/2007 18:30:20CreationDate: 20021209ShipmentDate: CAL931023658GenEPAID: 2002Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued)S113169556 TC6926581.2s Page 742 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934017963FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 4115 BROAD ST STE B-10FacilityAddress: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 1993-04-12 00:00:00IssuedEPAIDDate: PoliceProtectionNAICSDescription: 92212NAICSCode: 2003-10-15 09:54:40.607CreateDate: CAL931023658EPAID: NAICS: SACRAMENTO, CA942980001City,State,Zip: 601 N 7THSTContactAddress2: PO BOX942898ContactAddress: KARENMEJIAContactName: SACRAMENTO, CA942980001OwnerCity,State,Zip: 601 N 7THSTOwnerAddress2: PO BOX942898OwnerAddress: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAYPATROLOwnerName: SACRAMENTO, CA942980001MailingCity,State,Zip: 601 N 7TH ST, BLDGBMailingAddress2: PO BOX942898MailingAddress: KARENMEJIAMailingName: 12/30/2020LastActDate: 04/12/1993CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL931023658EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017963City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4115 BROAD ST STE B-10Address: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUISOBISPOName: HWTS: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL #701 COASTAL DIVISION SAN LUIS OBI (Continued) S113169556 120.66851Longitude: 35.25214Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007597RecordId: SLO CITY - HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/HWG ONLY < TQProgramElement: 0760ProgramElementCode: FA0005150FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3534 EMPLEO STEBAddress: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOGSERVICEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1301 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster AD 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 132 ft. 1/8-1/4 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WNW HAZNET3534EMPLEOSTEB N/A AD218 CUPAListingsSANLUISAUTOREPAIR & SMOG SERVICE S113138111 TC6926581.2s Page 743 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAL000296278GenEPAID: 2008Year: Additional Info: 0.57Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 221 - Waste oil and mixedoilCAWasteCode: CAD982446882TSDEPAID: CAL000296278Gepaid: 2005Year: 0.22935Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000296278Gepaid: 2008Year: 3534 EMPLEO STEBMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055418691Telephone: TONYGARZAContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017333City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 3534 EMPLEO ST STEBAddress: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOGSERVICEName: HAZNET: 120.66851Longitude: 35.25214Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007596RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005150FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3534 EMPLEO STEBAddress: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOGSERVICEName: 120.66851Longitude: 35.25214Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007595RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005150FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3534 EMPLEO STEBAddress: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOGSERVICEName: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOG SERVICE (Continued) S113138111 TC6926581.2s Page 744 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3534 EMPLEO ST STEBAddress: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOGSERVICEName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.57QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 221 - Waste oil and mixedoilWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982446882TSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982446882TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 23797116ManifestID: 20051006ReceiptDate: 12/22/2006 18:30:28CreationDate: 20051005ShipmentDate: CAL000296278GenEPAID: 2005Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.22935QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 003307880JJKManifestID: 20080317ReceiptDate: 5/16/2008 18:30:16CreationDate: 20080313ShipmentDate: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOG SERVICE (Continued)S113138111 TC6926581.2s Page 745 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934017333FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 3534 EMPLEO ST STEBFacilityAddress: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOGSERVICEFacilityName: 2015-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 2005-07-08 13:07:46.39000IssuedEPAIDDate: General AutomotiveRepairNAICSDescription: 811111NAICSCode: 2012-08-22 11:49:25.677CreateDate: CAL000296278EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 3534 EMPLEO STEBContactAddress: TONYGARZAContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 3534 EMPLEO STEBOwnerAddress: TONYGARZAOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 3534 EMPLEO STEBMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 01/27/2016LastActDate: 07/08/2005CreateDate: 06/30/2015InactiveDate: CAL000296278EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934017333City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: SAN LUIS AUTO REPAIR & SMOG SERVICE (Continued) S113138111 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4330 SANTA FERDAddress: ALLTEC INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017607RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE/WASTE GEN ONLY > TQProgramElement: 0711ProgramElementCode: FA0012041FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4330 SANTA FERDAddress: ALLTEC INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1303 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster AE 0.247 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 163 ft. 1/8-1/4 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SE HAZNET4330BSANTAFERD N/A AE219 CUPAListingsALLTECINTERGARATEDMANUFACTURINGINC S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 746 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.0175Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 331 - Off-specification, aged or surplusorganicsCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.02Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 352 - Other organicsolidsCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.0025Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 512 - Other empty containers 30 gallons ormoreCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2017Year: 4330-B SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055953500Telephone: RANDALL DENNIS / PRESIDENTContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4330 B SANTA FERDAddress: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURINGINCName: HAZNET: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017434RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1 WS <27 GAL/MO, SELF REPORTER)Program Element: 1125ProgramElementCode: FA0012041FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 4330 SANTA FERDAddress: ALLTEC INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, INCName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0017606RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (2 WASTE STREAMS <27 GAL/MO)Program Element: 1123ProgramElementCode: FA0012041FacilityId: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued) S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 747 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.5004Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD982446858TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2006Year: 0.025Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 791 - Liquids with pH <= 2CAWasteCode: CAD980887418TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2007Year: 0.95Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 221 - Waste oil and mixedoilCAWasteCode: CAD982446858TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2008Year: 0.7506Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAD982446858TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2011Year: 0.55Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 135 - Unspecified aqueoussolutionCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.3Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 135 - Unspecified aqueoussolutionCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2017Year: 0.005Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 141 - Off-specification, aged or surplusinorganicsCAWasteCode: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000267918Gepaid: 2017Year: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued) S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 748 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GQuantityUnit: 180WasteQuantity: 0.7506QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OIL INC - SANTAMARIATransName: CAD982446858TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 004267292JJKManifestID: 20111229ReceiptDate: 3/16/2012 20:30:17CreationDate: 20111228ShipmentDate: CAL000267918GenEPAID: 2011Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 120WasteQuantity: 0.5004QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982446858TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 000902526JJKManifestID: 20061016ReceiptDate: 3/30/2007 13:31:59CreationDate: 20061013ShipmentDate: CAL000267918GenEPAID: 2006Year: Additional Info: 1 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued)S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 749 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.76QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 221 - Waste oil and mixedoilWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982446858TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982446858TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 21763608ManifestID: 20030409ReceiptDate: 7/12/2003 18:31:23CreationDate: 20030408ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 190WasteQuantity: 0.722QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 221 - Waste oil and mixedoilWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD982446858TSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982446858TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 22676600ManifestID: 20031205ReceiptDate: 8/13/2004 7:53:20CreationDate: 20031204ShipmentDate: CAL000267918GenEPAID: 2003Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued)S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 750 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 50WasteQuantity: 0.025QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D002RCRACode: 791 - Liquids with pH < 2 792 Liquids with pH < 2 withmetalsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN OILINCTransName: CAD980887418TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 003307993JJKManifestID: 20071114ReceiptDate: 1/25/2008 18:30:59CreationDate: 20071107ShipmentDate: CAL000267918GenEPAID: 2007Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 250WasteQuantity: 0.95QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 221 - Waste oil and mixedoilWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982446858TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 002477449JJKManifestID: 20081204ReceiptDate: 1/9/2009 18:30:34CreationDate: 20081203ShipmentDate: CAL000267918GenEPAID: 2008Year: Additional Info: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued) S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 751 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20170520ReceiptDate: 10/6/2018 18:30:15CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: D001AdditionalCode4: D005AdditionalCode3: D006AdditionalCode2: F003AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 350WasteQuantity: 0.175QuantityTons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINTransName: NED981723513TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991738SKSManifestID: 20170520ReceiptDate: 10/6/2018 18:30:15CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D008AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 2000WasteQuantity: 1QuantityTons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelMethCode: D018RCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINTransName: NED981723513TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991738SKSManifestID: 20170520ReceiptDate: 10/6/2018 18:30:15CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: CAL000267918GenEPAID: 2017Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued)S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 752 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS OF WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIR SVSINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991740SKSManifestID: 20170510ReceiptDate: 5/30/2018 18:30:45CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 600WasteQuantity: 0.3QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D007RCRACode: 135 - Unspecified aqueoussolutionWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS OF WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIR SVSINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991740SKSManifestID: 20170510ReceiptDate: 5/30/2018 18:30:45CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0025QuantityTons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelMethCode: U112RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINTransName: NED981723513TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991738SKSManifestID: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued)S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 753 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PQuantityUnit: 10WasteQuantity: 0.005QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D002RCRACode: 141 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusinorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS OF WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991806SKSManifestID: 20170510ReceiptDate: 5/30/2018 18:30:45CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: D001AdditionalCode2: D035AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0025QuantityTons: H040 - Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As AFuelMethCode: U159RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINTransName: NED981723513TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991808SKSManifestID: 20170520ReceiptDate: 9/28/2018 18:30:12CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: D001AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.0075QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D028RCRACode: 331 - Off-specification, aged, or surplusorganicsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued)S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 754 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0025QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 512 - Other empty containers 30 gallons ormoreWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS OF WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991806SKSManifestID: 20170510ReceiptDate: 5/30/2018 18:30:45CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 40WasteQuantity: 0.02QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 352 - Other organicsolidsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS OF WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESINCTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991806SKSManifestID: 20170510ReceiptDate: 5/30/2018 18:30:45CreationDate: 20170426ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued)S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 755 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 4330 B SANTA FERDFacilityAddress: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURINGINCFacilityName: 2008-06-30 00:00:00InactiveDate: 2003-03-19 10:40:32.56000IssuedEPAIDDate: Wood Window and DoorManufacturingNAICSDescription: 321911NAICSCode: 2006-11-27 18:30:15.000CreateDate: CAL000267918EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: PMB347ContactAddress2: 4330-B SANTA FERDContactAddress: RANDALL DENNIS / PRESIDENTContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: PMB347OwnerAddress2: 4330-B SANTA FERDOwnerAddress: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURINGIOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000MailingCity,State,Zip: PMB347MailingAddress2: 4330-B SANTA FERDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 04/02/2013LastActDate: 03/19/2003CreateDate: 06/30/2008InactiveDate: CAL000267918EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 4330 B SANTA FERDAddress: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURINGINCName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: Landfill( To Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) H132 - Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be ClosedAsMethCode: D002RCRACode: 791 - Liquids with pH < 2 792 Liquids with pH < 2 withmetalsWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS GRASSYMOUNTAINTransName: UTD991301748TSDFEPAID: CLEANHARBORSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005991807SKSManifestID: 20170530ReceiptDate: 9/27/2018 18:30:17CreationDate: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued)S113125514 TC6926581.2s Page 756 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934010000FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC (Continued) S113125514 Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-12-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Business Plan. New status as CESQ Annual Inspection - facility will update change in managementforEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-12-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: standpipe connection can be seen by Excessive recycling due to expansion, relocated dumpster sotheEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 11-12-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10437349CERSID: 555024SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDAddress: SPICE HUNTER, THEName: CERS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10437349CERSID: 555024SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDAddress: SPICE HUNTER, THEName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 1306 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster AI 0.247 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW CERS184SUBURBANRD N/A AI220 CERS HAZWASTESPICEHUNTER, THE S124446534 TC6926581.2s Page 757 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 184 SUBURBANRDAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 804) 342-8572,Affiliation Phone: 23220AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: VAAffiliationState: RICHMONDAffiliationCity: 2000BROADAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SAUER BRANDS INC.Entity Name: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 184 SUBURBANROADAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FranciscoDuarteEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.669400Longitude: 35.245330Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10437349ProgramID: HMBPEnvIntTypeCode: SPICE HUNTER, THEFacilityName: 555024SiteID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: used on scissor lifts, fork li HMBP to be updated for CY 2019. Rechargeable lead acid batteriesareEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-02-2019EvalDate: SPICE HUNTER, THE (Continued)S124446534 TC6926581.2s Page 758 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 805) 597-8930,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JohnFiorenzaEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: FranciscoDuarteEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SPICE HUNTER, THEEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: SafetyCoordinatorEntityTitle: FranciscoDuarteEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: SPICE HUNTER, THE (Continued)S124446534 KKREYENHAGENContactName: CAL000293171EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7502HandlerCity,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDHandlerAddress: THE SPICE HUNTERINCHandlerName: 20050412DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1306 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster AI 0.247 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 184 SUBURBAN RD CAL000293171 AI221 RCRA NonGen / NLRTHESPICEHUNTERINC 1024811075 TC6926581.2s Page 759 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: YesUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: YesUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: KKREYENHAGENOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: CF SAUERCOOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7502MailingCity,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: KKREYENHAGEN@SPICEHUNTER.COMContactEmail: 805-544-2253ContactFax: 805-597-8972ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDContactAddress: THE SPICE HUNTER INC (Continued)1024811075 TC6926581.2s Page 760 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: THE SPICE HUNTERINCHandlerName: 20050412ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 800-688-5676Owner/Operator Telephone: RICHMOND, VA 23220-0000Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 2000 W BROADSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CF SAUERCOOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-597-8972Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: KKREYENHAGENOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20180905HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: THE SPICE HUNTER INC (Continued)1024811075 TC6926581.2s Page 761 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FOODMANUFACTURINGNAICSDescription: 311999NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: THE SPICE HUNTER INC (Continued) 1024811075 NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0011570RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0005125FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDAddress: SPICE HUNTER, THEName: 120.66969Longitude: 35.24407Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007533RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005125FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDAddress: SPICE HUNTER, THEName: 120.66969Longitude: 35.24407Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007534RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005125FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 184 SUBURBANRDAddress: SPICE HUNTER, THEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 1306 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster AI 0.247 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WSW 184 SUBURBAN RD N/A AI222 CUPAListingsSPICEHUNTER, THE S109432548 TC6926581.2s Page 762 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 120.66969Longitude: 35.24407Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: SPICE HUNTER, THE (Continued)S109432548 NHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperatorType: LYLENEMETHOperatorName: OtherOwnerType: CITY OF SAN LUISOBISPOOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 919 PALMSTMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: NotreportedActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: NotreportedLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: LNEMETH@SLOCITY.ORGContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-431-5466ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 919 PALMSTContactAddress: LYLENEMETHContactName: CAC003063239EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 500 PRADOROADHandlerAddress: CITY OF SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 20200414DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1312 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster AF 0.248 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 148 ft. 1/8-1/4 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NNE 500 PRADO ROAD CAC003063239 AF223 RCRA NonGen / NLRCITYOFSANLUISOBISPO 1026163248 TC6926581.2s Page 763 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 919 PALMSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: LYLENEMETHOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-781-7200Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 919 PALMSTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: OtherLegalStatus: CITY OF SAN LUISOBISPOOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifestBroker: NoRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20200424HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued)1026163248 TC6926581.2s Page 764 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATIONSYSTEMSNAICSDescription: 221310NAICSCode: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CITY OF SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 20200414ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-431-5466Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued) 1026163248 CrudeOilPotentialContaminantsofConcern: SoilPotentialMediaAffected: RegionalBoardFileLocation: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: TTCaseWorker: Cleanup ProgramSiteCaseType: 120.664644241333Longitude: 35.2542054845777Latitude: NotreportedLeadAgencyCaseNumber: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: T10000002348GlobalId: 05/20/2014StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedFacilityStatus: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: EAST PRADOROADAddress: COWAN (FORMER SERAFINO-MARTINELLI) PROPERTYName: CPS-SLIC: 1376 ft. Site 6 of 6 in cluster AG 0.261 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 131 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NNW CERSEASTPRADOROAD N/A AG224 CPS-SLICCOWAN (FORMER SERAFINO-MARTINELLI) PROPERTY S110505099 TC6926581.2s Page 765 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ensures documentation of the remaining contamination. Central Coast which has been recorded with the County Clerk and Recorder and entered into an indemnification agreement with the property owner, contamination (lots 53, 54 and 55). In 2013, Union Oil Company development to be constructed over the area with residual with Chevron, the property owner and developers) commercial show a widening of Prado Road and (as of 2007 - 2014 communication is heavily weathered and limited in extent. Future development plans non-detect for all chemicals of concern. Residual soil contamination analytical results from the site. Groundwater concentrations are July 25, 2007. Water Board staff reviewed that report, as well as the Summary and Request for Site Closure Report to the Water Board on used for drinking water purposes. Chevron submitted a Case Closure well is located near the Tank Farm s former office area, and is not Tank Farm cleanup and restoration project. The nearest water supply under Water Board direction as part of the Chevron San Luis Obispo subject property. Regular monitoring of wetlands is already performed wetland area located on the former Tank Farm property south of the and flows to the southwest. The nearest surface water body is the groundwater at the site is approximately 9 feet below ground surface heavily weathered nature of contamination encountered. The depth to the two wells. This is consistent with the very limited extent and or other petroleum-related constituents were detected in samples from whether the impacted soil posed a risk to groundwater quality. No TPH direction, two monitoring wells were installed in 2004 to determine of samples being less than 30 mg/kg. In response to Water Board non-detect to 4640 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), with the majority concentrations detected in soil on the property ranged from detected. Heavy-range total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) been in the soil for at least 80 years, volatile compounds were not hydrocarbons. As would be expected with weathered crude oil that has surface, and consists of highly weathered, heavy petroleum soil is limited to depths of approximately 8 to 15 feet below ground revealed limited soil impacts on the subject property. The impacted conducted subsurface investigations in 1998, 1999, and 2004 which determine the lateral and vertical extent of impacted soil, Chevron covenant to prohibit installation of a well on that property. To Water Board for no further action, and Chevron recorded a land use the Tank Farm and Cowan properties, has already been approved by the southwestern corner. The former Martinelli property, located between covering a total of 0.37 acres) onto the Cowan property s property and for a very limited extent (approximately 90 feet former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm north across the former Martinelli An oil pipeline, removed in the 1930s, transported oil from the Luis Obispo Tank Farm located to the south of the subject property. to crude oil pipeline operations associated with Chevron s former San dwellings. Approximately 0.37 acre of the property was impacted due property include a business-commercial park, and residential the Margarita Area Specific Plan in 2004. Development plans for the City of San Luis Obispo. The City annexed the property as part of residential-commercial area near the east end of Prado Road within groundwater quality. The subject property is located in a mixed ground surface at the subject property, which present low risk to of crude oil-impacted soils located between 8 and 15 feet below were non-detect for contaminants of concern. There is a limited area site assessment has been completed and groundwater concentrations Central Coast Water Board staff recommend closure of this casewhereSiteHistory: COWAN (FORMER SERAFINO-MARTINELLI) PROPERTY (Continued) S110505099 TC6926581.2s Page 766 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBSIPOAffiliationCity: 805 AEROVISTA PLACE, SUITE101AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: THEA TRYON - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Entity Name: Regional BoardCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Cleanup ProgramSiteCERSDescription: T10000002348CERSID: 220820SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: EAST PRADOROADAddress: COWAN (FORMER SERAFINO-MARTINELLI) PROPERTYName: CERS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: is a significant threat to groundwater quality. intend to reopen this case at this time since we don’t believe there the results of our preliminary ESL review, and notice that we do not Department, Montage Development, and Chevron with an email containing 2018, Water Board staff provided City of SLO Community Development assessment are warranted at parcels 53, 54, and 55. On January 30, an opinion that neither a soil gas survey nor a human health risk Boyle of City of SLO Fire Department to Water Board staff indicates residential land use decisions. A January 25, 2018, e-mail from Kerry and defer to the City s evaluation for a final determination about Board staff have not fully evaluated a residential land use scenario staff indicates that residential land use may be reasonable, Water were to occur. While a preliminary screening of ESLs by Water Board residential exposure to petroleum-impacted soil if such development Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) to evaluate the potential for site environmental data to current San Francisco Bay Water Board includes Lots 53, 54 & 55. Water Board staff subsequently compared 53, 54, & 55 and construct residential units in the area that owner (Montage Development, Inc.) desires to further reconfigure Lots Board staff were informed in December 2017 that the current property Executive Officer issued a case closure letter on May 20, 2014. Water hydrocarbon cases by the Central Coast Water Board in the past. The case closure is consistent with closure of similar petroleum Closure is consistent with Water Board policies and procedures. The documentation of remaining contamination under lots 53, 54 and 55. 4. agreement has been recorded for the property which ensures surface waters or drinking water supply wells. 3. An indemnification constituents in soil are highly weathered and unlikely to reach non-detect for contaminants of concern. Remaining hydrocarbon commercial) future development. 2. Groundwater samples were limited and contained within the footprint of appropriate (i.e., following: 1. The extent of the residual contaminants in soil is Water Board staff recommend closure of this case based on the COWAN (FORMER SERAFINO-MARTINELLI) PROPERTY (Continued) S110505099 TC6926581.2s Page 767 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 2/19/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: PFAS: 1432 ft. 0.271 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 161 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA ESE N/A 225 PFASWELL01 - STBY S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 768 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 26Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 769 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.1Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 10Value: WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 770 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 771 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 772 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 5.5Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 773 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 774 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFUNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000722-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000722GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL 01 - STBYName: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000722GeoTrackerURL: 120.644475Longitude: 35.243013Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/27/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 TC6926581.2s Page 775 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 44 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access WELL 01 - STBY (Continued)S127520835 NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: Approved by U.S. EPAComments: 06/05/2017CompletedDate: PA/SI SiteScreeningCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60002455AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102324AliasName: EPA IdentificationNumberAliasType: CAN000903697AliasName: AQUI, WELLPotentialDescription: 30013-NO 30026-NO 30153-NO 30564-NOConfirmedCOC: Lead 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA Chromium VI 1,1,2-TrichloroethanePotentialCOC: MANUFACTURING - ELECTRONIC, METAL PLATING - CHROMEPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6434Longitude: 35.24153Latitude: EPAGrantFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: EPA - PASISpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: StevenBeckerSupervisor: WilliamMartinezProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 5Acres: EvaluationSiteTypeDetailed: EvaluationSiteType: 102324SiteCode: 07/11/2018StatusDate: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 60002455FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 710 AEROVISTAPARKWAYAddress: EG&GCOATINGSName: ENVIROSTOR: 1960 ft. 0.371 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 184 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE CPS-SLIC710AEROVISTAPARKWAY N/A 226 ENVIROSTOREG&G COATINGS S120052857 TC6926581.2s Page 776 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 895 AEROVISTA PLACE, SUITE101AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DEAN THOMAS - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Entity Name: Regional BoardCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Cleanup ProgramSiteCERSDescription: T10000010082CERSID: 444631SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 710 AEROVISTAPARKAddress: VOLNY INVESTMENTCOMPANYName: CERS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local AgencyDatabaseFileLocation: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: DTCaseWorker: Cleanup ProgramSiteCaseType: 120.64339Longitude: 35.24159Latitude: NotreportedLeadAgencyCaseNumber: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: T10000010082GlobalId: 10/25/2018StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentFacilityStatus: STATERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 710 AEROVISTAPARKAddress: VOLNY INVESTMENTCOMPANYName: CPS-SLIC: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: EG&G COATINGS (Continued)S120052857 TC6926581.2s Page 777 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: NotreportedComments: 08/12/2016CompletedDate: PA/SI SiteScreeningCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60002344AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102301AliasName: EPA IdentificationNumberAliasType: CAD096009261/CAL000285664AliasName: UEPotentialDescription: 30022-NOConfirmedCOC: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotentialCOC: UNKNOWNPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6412Longitude: 35.24405Latitude: EPAGrantFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: EPA - PASISpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: KevinShaddySupervisor: NotreportedProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 1.38Acres: EvaluationSiteTypeDetailed: EvaluationSiteType: 102301SiteCode: 08/12/2016StatusDate: No ActionRequiredStatus: 60002344FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 845 FIEROLANEAddress: B&B COLLISIONREPAIRName: ENVIROSTOR: 1993 ft. 0.377 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 167 ft. 1/4-1/2 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE HAZNET845FIEROLN N/A 227 ENVIROSTORB & B BODY SHOP INC S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 778 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: CA Waste Code: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2002Year: 0.0075Tons: Disposal Method: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2003Year: NotreportedTons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2003Year: 0.9175Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2003Year: 0.9559Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2004Year: 0.0075Tons: Disposal Method: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2004Year: NotreportedTons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2004Year: PO BOX3197MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: Telephone: PAUL BRAGG JR - MANAGERContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 845 FIEROLNAddress: B & B BODY SHOPINCName: HAZNET: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 779 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8/24/2004 10:00:04CreationDate: 20031210ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22954651ManifestID: 20031218ReceiptDate: 8/24/2004 10:00:04CreationDate: 20031210ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 2003Year: Additional Info: 25 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 0.889Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2001Year: 0.1475Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2002Year: 0.3725Tons: H01 - TransferStationDisposalMethod: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAD096009261Gepaid: 2002Year: 0.018Tons: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 780 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22521294ManifestID: 20031027ReceiptDate: 8/3/2004 15:03:33CreationDate: 20031022ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23305346ManifestID: 20031121ReceiptDate: 8/5/2004 10:08:03CreationDate: 20031113ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22954651ManifestID: 20031218ReceiptDate: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 781 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22516705ManifestID: 20031010ReceiptDate: 8/3/2004 15:00:31CreationDate: 20031006ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.0075QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22516705ManifestID: 20031010ReceiptDate: 8/3/2004 15:00:31CreationDate: 20031006ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.05QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 782 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22511569ManifestID: 20030917ReceiptDate: 8/2/2004 9:36:58CreationDate: 20030911ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.0075QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22511569ManifestID: 20030917ReceiptDate: 8/2/2004 9:36:58CreationDate: 20030911ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22648529ManifestID: 20031008ReceiptDate: 8/3/2004 7:33:04CreationDate: 20031002ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 783 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 98200773ManifestID: 19981119ReceiptDate: 1/13/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19981118ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 1998Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 250WasteQuantity: 0.125QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22874934ManifestID: 20030818ReceiptDate: 7/28/2004 10:45:53CreationDate: 20030811ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 784 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 275WasteQuantity: 1.1467QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008302903TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 96810222ManifestID: 19980210ReceiptDate: 4/16/1998 0:00:00CreationDate: 19980209ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 110WasteQuantity: 0.4587QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008302903TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 97297706ManifestID: 19980604ReceiptDate: 8/3/1998 0:00:00CreationDate: 19980522ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 145WasteQuantity: 0.6046QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008302903TSDFAltEPAID: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 785 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 190WasteQuantity: 0.627QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: ILD099202681TransEPAID: 93634342ManifestID: 19950119ReceiptDate: 3/28/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19950118ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 255WasteQuantity: 0.8415QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008302903TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: MOD095038998TransEPAID: 93182925ManifestID: 19950824ReceiptDate: 4/2/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19950823ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 1995Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 786 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23710376ManifestID: 20040908ReceiptDate: 12/28/2004 14:46:39CreationDate: 20040831ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23710376ManifestID: 20040908ReceiptDate: 12/28/2004 14:46:39CreationDate: 20040831ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 8WasteQuantity: 0.0264QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23719672ManifestID: 20041123ReceiptDate: 1/20/2005 18:31:32CreationDate: 20041109ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 2004Year: Additional Info: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 787 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23356612ManifestID: 20040722ReceiptDate: 11/1/2004 12:36:11CreationDate: 20040715ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23511861ManifestID: 20040722ReceiptDate: 11/1/2004 12:36:11CreationDate: 20040715ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 788 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23474730ManifestID: 20040517ReceiptDate: 10/15/2004 8:41:08CreationDate: 20040511ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23505094ManifestID: 20040616ReceiptDate: 10/15/2004 15:16:06CreationDate: 20040611ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 4WasteQuantity: 0.002QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 789 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23471785ManifestID: 20040329ReceiptDate: 8/23/2004 8:30:10CreationDate: 20040319ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23462629ManifestID: 20040423ReceiptDate: 10/14/2004 15:19:37CreationDate: 20040415ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23478884ManifestID: 20040423ReceiptDate: 10/14/2004 15:19:37CreationDate: 20040415ShipmentDate: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 790 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008302903TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 98720694ManifestID: 19990617ReceiptDate: 7/30/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990608ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 130WasteQuantity: 0.5421QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 99421451ManifestID: 19991209ReceiptDate: 2/1/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 19991203ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 1999Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 200WasteQuantity: 0.1QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 791 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 85WasteQuantity: 0.3544QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAD008302903TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 98720459ManifestID: 19990303ReceiptDate: 4/20/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990217ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 300WasteQuantity: 0.15QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT080013352TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 98780867ManifestID: 19990412ReceiptDate: 7/13/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19990401ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.417QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 792 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SCR000075150TransEPAID: 22133507ManifestID: 20021112ReceiptDate: 2/21/2003 10:41:38CreationDate: 20021106ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 22140683ManifestID: 20021209ReceiptDate: 3/16/2007 18:30:20CreationDate: 20021204ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 100WasteQuantity: 0.05QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 22140683ManifestID: 20021209ReceiptDate: 3/16/2007 18:30:20CreationDate: 20021204ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 2002Year: Additional Info: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 793 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21905308ManifestID: 20020924ReceiptDate: 1/27/2003 18:33:26CreationDate: 20020919ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.0125QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21911291ManifestID: 20021018ReceiptDate: 2/6/2003 18:31:16CreationDate: 20021014ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 794 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21901665ManifestID: 20020905ReceiptDate: 1/27/2003 18:31:12CreationDate: 20020827ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21905308ManifestID: 20020924ReceiptDate: 1/27/2003 18:33:26CreationDate: 20020919ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 90WasteQuantity: 0.045QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 795 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21737925ManifestID: 20020722ReceiptDate: 9/18/2002 18:31:39CreationDate: 20020712ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 70WasteQuantity: 0.035QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21749543ManifestID: 20020807ReceiptDate: 3/13/2003 18:31:17CreationDate: 20020731ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0025QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21749543ManifestID: 20020807ReceiptDate: 3/13/2003 18:31:17CreationDate: 20020731ShipmentDate: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 796 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D001RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000646117TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000646117TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: MOD095038998TransEPAID: 96113977ManifestID: 19970611ReceiptDate: 9/12/1997 0:00:00CreationDate: 19970611ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 55WasteQuantity: 0.187QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT080013352TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT080013352TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD063547996Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD980584510TransEPAID: 96770190ManifestID: 19971204ReceiptDate: 4/23/1998 0:00:00CreationDate: 19971112ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 1997Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 797 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20386439ManifestID: 20010101ReceiptDate: 3/22/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001228ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 216WasteQuantity: 0.108QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20386439ManifestID: 20010101ReceiptDate: 3/22/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001228ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 2000Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 275WasteQuantity: 0.9075QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 798 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20289679ManifestID: 20001102ReceiptDate: 1/9/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001031ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20289679ManifestID: 20001102ReceiptDate: 1/9/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001031ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20380540ManifestID: 20001201ReceiptDate: 2/1/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001127ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 799 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20029739ManifestID: 20000913ReceiptDate: 11/14/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000908ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20035381ManifestID: 20001011ReceiptDate: 12/13/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001005ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 218WasteQuantity: 0.109QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 800 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.015QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 99340375ManifestID: 20000714ReceiptDate: 9/11/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000712ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20200389ManifestID: 20000811ReceiptDate: 10/23/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000809ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 801 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20011211ReceiptDate: 1/29/2002 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011206ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.01QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21319603ManifestID: 20011211ReceiptDate: 1/29/2002 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011206ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 2001Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 90WasteQuantity: 0.3753QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 99639374ManifestID: 20000623ReceiptDate: 8/2/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000605ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 802 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21393733ManifestID: 20011015ReceiptDate: 12/17/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011010ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21373388ManifestID: 20011113ReceiptDate: 1/16/2002 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011108ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.075QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21319603ManifestID: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 803 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21397642ManifestID: 20010918ReceiptDate: 11/1/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010913ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21393733ManifestID: 20011015ReceiptDate: 12/17/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011010ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 416WasteQuantity: 0.208QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 804 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21104168ManifestID: 20010724ReceiptDate: 10/1/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010718ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 216WasteQuantity: 0.108QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21104168ManifestID: 20010724ReceiptDate: 10/1/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010718ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21104794ManifestID: 20010822ReceiptDate: 10/23/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010817ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 805 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000624247TransEPAID: 95297483ManifestID: 19961219ReceiptDate: 5/20/1997 0:00:00CreationDate: 19961218ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 1996Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21129185ManifestID: 20010625ReceiptDate: 8/24/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010620ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 36WasteQuantity: 0.018QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 806 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 125WasteQuantity: 0.4125QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CA0000367755TransEPAID: 95741914ManifestID: 19960209ReceiptDate: 10/10/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19960208ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 150WasteQuantity: 0.495QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CA0000367755TransEPAID: 96152311ManifestID: 19960726ReceiptDate: 5/20/1997 0:00:00CreationDate: 19960725ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 165WasteQuantity: 0.688QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 807 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19940310ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 27WasteQuantity: 0.0135QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: ILD984908202Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: ILD984908202TransEPAID: 93429411ManifestID: 19940414ReceiptDate: 10/5/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19940412ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 275WasteQuantity: 0.9075QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D001RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: ILD099202681TransEPAID: 93592206ManifestID: 19940713ReceiptDate: 10/16/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19940712ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 1994Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 808 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 845 FIEROLNAddress: B & B BODY SHOPINCName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 220WasteQuantity: 0.726QuantityTons: NotreportedMethCode: F003RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD008302903TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: ILD099202681TransEPAID: 93148225ManifestID: NotreportedReceiptDate: 9/12/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19930929ShipmentDate: CAD096009261GenEPAID: 1993Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 27WasteQuantity: 0.0135QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: F005RCRACode: 212 - Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613893TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: ILD984908202Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: ILD984908202TransEPAID: 93420514ManifestID: 19940311ReceiptDate: 9/15/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 TC6926581.2s Page 809 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934010000FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 845 FIEROLNFacilityAddress: B & B BODY SHOPINCFacilityName: 2005-06-30 15:01:00InactiveDate: 1987-04-10 00:00:00IssuedEPAIDDate: Automotive Body, Paint, and Interior Repair andMaintenanceNAICSDescription: 811121NAICSCode: 2002-03-14 16:36:26.000CreateDate: CAD096009261EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 845 FIEROLANEContactAddress: PAUL BRAGG JR - MANAGERContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 845 FIEROLANEOwnerAddress: PATRICIABRAGGOwnerName: PASO ROBLES, CA934470000MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: PO BOX3197MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 09/27/2005LastActDate: 04/10/1987CreateDate: 06/30/2005InactiveDate: CAD096009261EPAID: B & B BODY SHOP INC (Continued)S113002249 NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 2152 ft. 0.408 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 201 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA ENE N/A 228 PFASWELL01 S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 810 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 811 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1.3Value: Qualifier: PFHXSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 812 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 813 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 814 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 815 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 816 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 TC6926581.2s Page 817 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 44 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000778GeoTrackerURL: 120.642783Longitude: 35.253401Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 6/11/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 1Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000778-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000778GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520841 NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: PFAS: 2233 ft. 0.423 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 121 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA WSW N/A 229 PFASWELL01 S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 818 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 4Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 819 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 820 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 821 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: HFPA-DAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFUNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 822 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: 9ClPF3ONSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 823 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: 11ClPF3OUDSChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 824 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/21/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL01Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/30/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 TC6926581.2s Page 825 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 116 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000725GeoTrackerURL: 120.672861Longitude: 35.242916Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/21/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 2Value: Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000725-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000725GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: WELL 01 (Continued)S127520834 NotreportedAcres: HistoricalSiteTypeDetailed: HistoricalSiteType: NotreportedSiteCode: 01/15/1992StatusDate: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 40250001FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 870 INDUSTRIALWAYAddress: CALIFORNIACOOPERAGEName: ENVIROSTOR: 2304 ft. 0.436 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 197 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERS HAZWASTESANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ENE AST870INDUSTRIALWAY N/A 230 ENVIROSTORCALIFORNIACOOPERAGE S103674757 TC6926581.2s Page 826 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8057832060OperatorPhone: DaveSchlossbergOperatorName: 93401MailingAddressZipCode: CAMailingAddressState: SAN LUISOBISPOMailingAddressCity: 870 INDUSTRIALWAYMailingAddress: NotreportedFax: 8057832060Phone: POLYPERFORMANCEBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: 10436728CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: SCHLOSSBERG, DAVIDOwner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 870 INDUSTRIALWYAddress: POLYPERFORMANCEName: AST: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: NotreportedComments: NotreportedCompletedDate: NotreportedCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: NotreportedCompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 40250001AliasName: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialDescription: NONESPECIFIEDConfirmedCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6419Longitude: 35.25282Latitude: NotreportedFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: NotreportedSpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: CleanupSacramentoDivisionBranch: Referred - NotAssignedSupervisor: NotreportedProgramManager: NONESPECIFIEDLeadAgency: NONESPECIFIEDRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: CALIFORNIA COOPERAGE (Continued)S103674757 TC6926581.2s Page 827 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation electronically via "EZ Submit Porta Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-15-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: before year’s end. Annual inspection. HMBP is being completed and will besubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-08-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: the electronic database via "E Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated and submittedtoEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-30-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10436728CERSID: 144311SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 870 INDUSTRIALWYAddress: POLYPERFORMANCEName: CERS: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10436728CERSID: 144311SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 870 INDUSTRIALWYAddress: POLYPERFORMANCEName: CERS HAZ WASTE: CAL000360132EPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 93401OwnerZipCode: CAOwnerState: 870 INDUSTRIALWYOwnerMailAddress: 8057832060OwnerPhone: CALIFORNIA COOPERAGE (Continued) S103674757 TC6926581.2s Page 828 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 706-0235,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DavidSchlossbergEntityName: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: POLYPERFORMANCEEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 234-1760,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: DaveSchlossbergEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: keep documentation. Hazardo Continue efforts to provide employees with annual safety trainingandEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 12-16-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: for CY 2019. No violations no Good employee training program. HMBP has been updatedelectronicallyEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 05-22-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: CALIFORNIA COOPERAGE (Continued) S103674757 TC6926581.2s Page 829 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 870 IndustrialWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JoeFernandezEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: BobbieCunninghamEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 783-2060,Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 870INDUSTRIALAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SCHLOSSBERG, DAVIDEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: ControllerEntityTitle: BobbieCunninghamEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 870 INDUSTRIALWAYAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CALIFORNIA COOPERAGE (Continued)S103674757 TC6926581.2s Page 830 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 12/18/2019Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: ADONAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: PFAS: 2336 ft. 0.442 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 116 ft. 1/4-1/2 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SW N/A 231 PFASWELL02 S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 831 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Qualifier: PFHPAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFBSAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 832 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFNAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 833 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: NETFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 834 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFDOAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: NMEFOSAAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 835 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFHAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 836 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFTEDAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 837 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFUNDCAChemical: LiquidMatrix: 4000806-001LocationID: All PFASChemicalssource_type: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedBeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocationCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: NotreportedCaseworker: NotreportedLeadAgency: NotreportedFacilityRegion: W0604000806GlobalID: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedEnviroscreenScore: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProgramType: NotreportedEnvirostorID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: WELL02Name: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=W0604000806GeoTrackerURL: 120.67334Longitude: 35.24112Latitude: DDWWellSiteType: Drinking WaterWellsSiteUse: PUBWFieldPtClass: 3/17/2020Date: NG/LUnits: NotreportedQuarterlyRunningAnnualAverage: NotreportedLabNotes: NotreportedDetectionLimit: NotreportedReportingLimit: 3Value: Qualifier: PFTRIDAChemical: WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 TC6926581.2s Page 838 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62 additional CA PFAS: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access WELL 02 (Continued)S127520827 NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: YesTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: PrivateOperatorType: NOTREQUIREDOperatorName: PrivateOwnerType: KENNETHDEWAROwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93403MailingCity,State,Zip: P O BOX4417MailingAddress: 5StateDistrict: CAStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: OtherLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-543-9461ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401ContactCity,State,Zip: 75 A PRADORDContactAddress: ENVIRONMENTALMANAGERContactName: CAD982483372EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 75 A PRADORDHandlerAddress: DIAMOND OILSERVICEHandlerName: 19900308DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 2397 ft.CERSSite1of2inclusterAJ 0.454 mi.HWP Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/4-1/2 ECHOSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 NW FINDS75APRADORD CAD982483372 AJ232 RCRA NonGen / NLRDIAMONDOILSERVICE 1000301500 TC6926581.2s Page 839 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: PrivateLegalStatus: KENNETHDEWAROwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20020627HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: DIAMOND OIL SERVICE (Continued)1000301500 TC6926581.2s Page 840 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DIAMOND OILSERVICEName: CAD981370539EPAID: HWP: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 A PRADORDAddress: DIAMOND OILSERVICEName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002826372DFRURL: 110002826372RegistryID: 1000301500Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002826372RegistryID: FINDS: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: No NAICS CodesFoundNAICSCodes: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: CAStateDistrictOwner: Not a generator, verifiedFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: DIAMOND OILSERVICEHandlerName: 19900308ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: DIAMOND OIL SERVICE (Continued) 1000301500 TC6926581.2s Page 841 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedComments: NotreportedDueDate: Imported 12/2011:STPERMITTitleDescription: STNDType: NotreportedFinalDate: NotreportedPermitBeingModified: NotreportedPermitBeingRenewed: New OperatingPermitActivityType: CLOSEDFacilityStatus: NotreportedSupervisor: NotreportedProjectManagerLead: NotreportedProjectManager: DIAMOND OILSERVICEFacilityName: Historical - Non-OperatingFacilityType: CAD981370539EPAID: 04/28/1998ActualDate: New Operating Permit - PERMIT TERMINATED - TERMINATIONAPPROVEDEventDescription: NotreportedUnitNames: NotreportedComments: NotreportedDueDate: Imported 12/2011:STPERMITTitleDescription: STNDType: NotreportedFinalDate: NotreportedPermitBeingModified: NotreportedPermitBeingRenewed: New OperatingPermitActivityType: CLOSEDFacilityStatus: NotreportedSupervisor: NotreportedProjectManagerLead: NotreportedProjectManager: DIAMOND OILSERVICEFacilityName: Historical - Non-OperatingFacilityType: CAD981370539EPAID: Activities: NotreportedTotalActualHours: NotreportedTotalPlannedAmount: NotreportedTotalPlannedHours: 16-20%Calenviroscreen Score: NotreportedPermitExpirationDate: NotreportedPermitEffectiveDate: StandardizedPermitType: NotreportedProjectManager: NotreportedProjectManagerLead: NotreportedQuarterlyUpdate: NotreportedCommercialOffsiteFacilityTypes: NotreportedPublicInformationOfficer: 35AssemblyDistrict: 17SenateDistrict: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedSupervisor: NotreportedFacilitySize: Historical - Non-OperatingFacilityType: 120.6707Longitude: 35.25459Latitude: CLOSEDCleanupStatus: 75 PRADOROADAddress: DIAMOND OIL SERVICE (Continued)1000301500 TC6926581.2s Page 842 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: P O BOX3095AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KenDewarEntityName: FacilityOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: HazardousWasteCERSDescription: CAD981370539CERSID: 219296SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 75 PRADOROADAddress: DIAMOND OILSERVICEName: CERS: 07/06/2000ActualDate: Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSUREVERIFICATIONEventDescription: TANKUnitNames: NotreportedComments: NotreportedDueDate: ClosureTitleDescription: STNDType: NotreportedFinalDate: ClosureFinalActivityType: CLOSEDFacilityStatus: NotreportedFacilitySize: NotreportedSupervisor: NotreportedProjectManagerLead: NotreportedProjectManager: DIAMOND OILSERVICEFacilityName: Historical - Non-OperatingFacilityType: CAD981370539EPAID: 05/31/2000ActualDate: Closure Final - RECEIVE CLOSURECERTIFICATIONEventDescription: TANKUnitNames: NotreportedComments: NotreportedDueDate: ClosureTitleDescription: STNDType: NotreportedFinalDate: ClosureFinalActivityType: CLOSEDFacilityStatus: NotreportedFacilitySize: NotreportedSupervisor: NotreportedProjectManagerLead: NotreportedProjectManager: DIAMOND OILSERVICEFacilityName: Historical - Non-OperatingFacilityType: CAD981370539EPAID: Closure: 04/01/1994ActualDate: New Operating Permit - APPLICATION PART BRECEIVEDEventDescription: NotreportedUnitNames: DIAMOND OIL SERVICE (Continued)1000301500 TC6926581.2s Page 843 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8055439461,Affiliation Phone: Affiliation Zip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: INACT PER 98VQ FINAL NOTICE- BATCH 4/27AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KENNETHDEWAREntityName: FacilityContactAffiliationTypeDesc: 8055439461,Affiliation Phone: 934030000AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: DIAMOND OIL SERVICE (Continued) 1000301500 concentrations are expected to continue to decrease with time. The historical monitoring data indicate the hydrocarbon constituent mass has been removed from the site to the extent practical, and contracting or declining in size and concentration. The contaminant residual groundwater contaminants are well characterized and diesel, and fuel oxygenates are below cleanup goals. Remaining ug/L. Other common groundwater contaminants associated with gasoline, Water Board cleanup goal for total petroleum hydrocarbons is 1,000 and TPH-d are 4,200 micrograms per liter (ug/L). The Central Coast monitoring well (MW-3) indicate contaminant levels of TPH-g are 1,900 Coast Water Board cleanup goals. Analytical results in one on-site and diesel (TPH-d) remain at concentrations greater than Central indicate total petroleum hydrocarbons reported as gasoline (TPH-g) underground storage tank (UST) case where groundwater sample results Central Coast Water Board staff recommends closure ofthisSiteHistory: Diesel, MTBE / TBA / Other Fuel Oxygenates, GasolinePotentialContaminantsofConcern: Aquifer used for drinking watersupplyPotentialMediaAffect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: RegionalBoardFileLocation: NotreportedLocalAgency: 3477RBCaseNumber: TASCaseWorker: 10/07/2013StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: 120.670596063137Longitude: 35.2547771481765Latitude: T0607909561GlobalId: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607909561GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: J.B. DEWARName: LUST: CERS CUPA Listings Cortese 2397 ft.CHMIRSSite2of2inclusterAJ 0.454 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERS HAZWASTESANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 NW AST75PRADORD N/A AJ233 LUSTJBDEWARINC S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 844 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 13267RequirementAction: 09/21/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedPhoneNumber: tom.sayles@waterboards.ca.govEmail: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 895 AEROVISTA PL, SUITE101Address: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Organization Name: TOMSAYLESContactName: Regional BoardCaseworkerContactType: T0607909561GlobalId: LUST: action, soil gas analysis, and a human health risk assessment. may include, but are not limited to, a case review, further remedial proposed to be redeveloped. Additional actions required by City Fire City Fire may require additional site assessment if the property is protection, and restrictions on the disposal of soil and groundwater. Future site disturbance could require worker health and safety brought to the surface by these activities are managed appropriately. any) to ensure that any possibly contaminated soils or groundwater properties, and a description of the mitigation actions necessary (if groundwater contamination underlie the property and nearby notification must include a statement that residual soil and departments must be notified prior to site redevelopment. This City Fire), and the appropriate local planning and building The Central Coast Water Board, San Luis Obispo City Fire Department activities, such as site grading, excavation, de-watering, and etc. could pose an unacceptable risk under certain site redevelopment Residual soil and groundwater contamination still exists on-site that residual levels of contamination to degrade naturally over time. concentrations. Central Coast Water Board staff expects these geology, well distances, screen depth, and low remaining contaminant wells or surface water considering groundwater flow direction, area hydrocarbons remaining are unlikely to affect any of these water approximately 200 feet east of the site. The residual petroleum lies within the drainage basin of the San Luis Obispo Creek, which is and 1,750 feet southeast, respectively, of the site. The property Sourdough well, which are located approximately 1,600 feet northwest active wells include the Sunset Drive-in well and the San Luis the site. Two of the CDPH wells are active and one is destroyed. The municipal supply wells are located within an one-half mile radius of Three California Department of Public Health (CDPH) regulated contaminated soil identified beneath UST equipment was not removed. ground s surface, the depth where wet sediments were encountered, but investigation. Accessible soil was removed up to 13 feet below the gasoline contaminated soils were identified after a soil an upgrade of the UST piping system in February 2003, diesel and bulk liquids terminal containing 12 aboveground storage tanks. During This site consists of an office, warehouse, refueling facility, and contain unleaded gasoline, diesel, kerosene, and Stoddard solvent. the intersection of Higuera Street and Prado Road, has 6 UST s that subject site, located in the southern portion of San Luis Obispo near J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 845 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/20/2011Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Interim Remedial ActionReportAction: 05/30/2008Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/20/2008Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/20/2008Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/20/2007Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/20/2004Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 10/20/2009Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 04/20/2009Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 02/27/2003Date: OtherActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR)Action: 10/19/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: FilereviewAction: 03/15/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 846 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Soil and Water InvestigationReportAction: 04/20/2003Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: LeakReportedAction: 03/11/2003Date: OtherActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Notice of Public Hearing / BoardActionAction: 09/06/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: 13267RequirementAction: 03/23/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: 13267 MonitoringProgramAction: 01/28/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Notice ofResponsibilityAction: 01/06/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: 13267RequirementAction: 01/28/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: VerbalCommunicationAction: 02/14/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: 08/30/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: 04/07/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 10/03/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: 01/06/2003Date: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 847 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REMEDIATIONActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: In Situ BiologicalTreatmentAction: 10/15/2005Date: REMEDIATIONActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: ExcavationAction: 02/27/2003Date: REMEDIATIONActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Well Destruction Report - RegulatorRespondedAction: 09/15/2013Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/20/2011Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/20/2008Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/20/2008Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/20/2007Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/20/2006Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/20/2004Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/20/2003Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Preliminary Site AssessmentReportAction: 03/30/2004Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 848 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Interim Remedial ActionReportAction: 11/30/2005Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Remedial ProgressReportAction: 03/01/2006Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/20/2009Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: LeakStoppedAction: 02/27/2003Date: OtherActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Interim Remedial ActionReportAction: 07/20/2006Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/20/2007Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/20/2007Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 04/02/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 03/11/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 03/12/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: StaffLetterAction: 04/21/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 04/23/2008Date: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 849 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/20/2004Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/20/2005Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/21/2004Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/20/2011Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 10/20/2010Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 04/20/2010Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: NPDES / WDRReportsAction: 04/30/2009Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Notification - Fee Title OwnersNoticeAction: 05/21/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Closure/No Further ActionLetterAction: 10/07/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/20/2006Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/20/2006Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 850 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0607909561GlobalId: 01/24/2007StatusDate: Open - VerificationMonitoringStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 08/08/2006StatusDate: Open - RemediationStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 08/30/2005StatusDate: Open - RemediationStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 04/22/2004StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 12/16/2003StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 03/30/2003StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 02/27/2003StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 01/06/2003StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: LUST: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/20/2005Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Interim Remedial ActionPlanAction: 04/20/2005Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/20/2005Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/20/2006Date: RESPONSEActionType: T0607909561GlobalId: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/20/2005Date: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 851 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Max MTBE Data: NotreportedMaxMTBESoil: NotreportedMaxMTBEGrndWtr: MTBE Class: NotreportedFunding: NotreportedInterimAction: NotreportedPilotProgram: Monitoring: NotreportedRemedialAction: NotreportedRemedialPlan: Pollution Char: NotreportedPrelimAssess: NotreportedWorkplan: NotreportedConfirmLeak: CMWStaffInitials: LocalAgencyLeadAgency: San Luis Obispo, San Luis ObispoCountyLocalAgency: HIGUERA STSCrossStreet: NotreportedContact: 75 PRADORDRPAddress: KENDEWARResponsibleParty: NotreportedEnforcementType: NotreportedCloseDate: NotreportedEnforceDate: Review Date: 2/27/03StopDate: Enter Date: 2/27/03DiscoveredDate: 03/11/2003ReleaseDate: OMHowDiscovered: OtherMeansHowStopped: OverfillLeakCause: PipingLeakSource: NotreportedAbatementMethod: NotreportedQuantity: GasolineSubstance: SCaseType: NotreportedLocalCaseNum: 3477CaseNumber: NotreportedStatus: T0607909561GlobalID: San LuisObispoFacilityCounty: Central CoastRegionRegionalBoard: 3Region: LUST REG 3: 10/07/2013StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 06/21/2012StatusDate: Open - Eligible forClosureStatus: T0607909561GlobalId: 07/15/2010StatusDate: Open - VerificationMonitoringStatus: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 852 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RCNG, INCName: CERS HAZ WASTE: CAL000194428EPAID: NotreportedPropertyOwnerCountry: NotreportedPropertyOwnerZipCode: NotreportedPropertyOwnerStat : NotreportedPropertyOwnerCity: NotreportedPropertyOwnerMailingAddress: NotreportedPropertyOwnerPhone: NotreportedPropertyOwnerName: UnitedStatesOwnerCountry: 93403OwnerZipCode: CAOwnerState: PO BOX3059OwnerMailAddress: 8055430180OwnerPhone: 8055430180OperatorPhone: J B Dewar Inc.Operator Name: 93401MailingAddressZipCode: CAMailingAddressState: SAN LUISOBISPOMailingAddressCity: 75 PRADORDMailingAddress: 8055438537Fax: 8055430180Phone: JBDEWARBusinessName: NotreportedFacilityID: 10437799CERSID: NotreportedTotalGallons: J BDEWAROwner: NotreportedCertifiedUnifiedProgramAgencies: SAN LUIS OBISPO,93401City/Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: JBDEWARName: AST: OVERSPILL BUCKETS AT THE TANK PIT SHOWED EVIDENCE OF REL DISPENSER ISLANDS AS A RESULT OF NO UNDER-DISPENSER CONTAINMENT. DISPOSED OF. ELEVATED LEVELS OF MTBE AND TPH-DIESEL DOCUMENTED AT SOIL CONTAMINATION AROUND DISPENSER ISLANDS REMOVED ANDPROPERLYSummary: NotreportedAssignedName: 0DistanceFromWell: NotreportedWellName: NotreportedWaterSystem: NotreportedOperator: NotreportedSuspended: NotreportedUSTCleanupFundID: NotreportedPriority: NotreportedBeneficial: NotreportedBasinPlan: NotreportedOrgName: 1MtbeFuel: 0MtbeConcentratn: NotreportedGrndWtrQualifier: NotreportedSoilQualifier: 0 / 0Lat/Long: NTMTBETested: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 853 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: NotreportedDateCompleted: NotreportedOESTime: NotreportedOESDate: 12/04/2012OESnotification: 12-7408OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: NotreportedNumberOfTanks: NotreportedContent: NotreportedSTG: NotreportedTankUse: NotreportedActiveDate: NotreportedCapacity: NotreportedTankStatus: NotreportedSWRCBTankId: NotreportedOwnerTankId: 07-07-93CreatedDate: 07-07-93ActionDate: 12-15-92ReferralDate: 44-025084BoardOfEqualization: 1Number: 5887CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 75 PRADORDAddress: J B DEWARINCName: SWEEPS UST: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10438051CERSID: 20304SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 854 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607909561GlobalID: NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: J.B. DEWARName: CORTESE: area, RP handled containment and clean up. material flowed onto concrete in a containment Tank was over filled causing the release,Description: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: NotreportedNumberofFatalities: NotreportedNumberofInjuries: NotreportedEvacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: 20QuantityReleased: Oil - Auto TransmissionFluidSubstance: NotreportedEDate: NotreportedSiteType: YesContained: NotreportedAmount: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentAdminAgency: 12/4/2012IncidentDate: JB DewarIncAgency: 2012Year: 1530Date/Time: NotreportedOther: Gal(s)Measure: NotreportedType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: ReportingPartyCleanupBy: Merchant/BusinessSpillSite: NotreportedWaterway: NoWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 855 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FA0005201FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: JBDEWARName: 120.67098Longitude: 35.25517Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007770RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 11+Program Element: 0764ProgramElementCode: FA0005201FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: JBDEWARName: 120.67098Longitude: 35.25517Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007771RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005201FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: JBDEWARName: 120.67098Longitude: 35.25517Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007772RecordId: SLO CITY - RENEWAL - UST ANNUAL PERMITFEEProgramElement: 0351ProgramElementCode: FA0005201FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: JBDEWARName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 856 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010650RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005241FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: CLEAN ENERGY - 75 PRADO RD.Name: 120.67045Longitude: 35.24960Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007865RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005241FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: CLEAN ENERGY - 75 PRADO RD.Name: 120.67045Longitude: 35.24960Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007866RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005241FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: CLEAN ENERGY - 75 PRADO RD.Name: 120.67098Longitude: 35.25517Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007976RecordId: SLO CITY - AGT PERMIT (3 OR MORE TANKS)Program Element: 1253ProgramElementCode: FA0005201FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: JBDEWARName: 120.67098Longitude: 35.25517Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007939RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 857 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-28-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Placards and signs are to be posted HMBP has been updated for CY 2019 and submitted electronically.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 06-07-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10438051CERSID: 20304SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: RCNG, INCName: CERS: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019221RecordId: SLO CITY-WASTE STREAM (DE MINIMUS)Program Element: 1174ProgramElementCode: FA0013721FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: RCNG, INCName: 0.00000Longitude: 0.00000Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0019220RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0013721FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: RCNG, INCName: 120.67045Longitude: 35.24960Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 858 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PASOROBLESAffiliationCity: PO Box2820AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: RCNG, INCEntityName: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: CFOEntityTitle: MataIaiaEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93447AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: PasoRoblesAffiliationCity: PO Box2820AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MATAIAIAEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MataIaiaEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.670940Longitude: 35.254200Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10438051ProgramID: HWGEnvIntTypeCode: RCNG, INCFacilityName: 20304SiteID: Coordinates: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 859 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 895 AEROVISTA PL, SUITE101AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: TOM SAYLES - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Entity Name: Regional BoardCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank CleanupSiteCERSDescription: T0607909561CERSID: 189113SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 75 PRADORDAddress: J.B. DEWARName: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: RCNG, INCEntityName: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 238-0624,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MATAIAIAEntityName: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 93447AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: PASOROBLESAffiliationCity: PO BOX2820AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 238-0624,Affiliation Phone: 93447AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: J B DEWAR INC (Continued)S105791104 TC6926581.2s Page 860 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0MtbeFuel: 0MtbeConcentratn: NotreportedGrndWtrQualifier: NotreportedSoilQualifier: 35.239554 / -120.6404291Lat/Long: NRQMTBETested: Max MTBE Data: NotreportedMaxMTBESoil: NotreportedMaxMTBEGrndWtr: MTBE Class: NotreportedFunding: 0InterimAction: USTPilotProgram: Monitoring: NotreportedRemedialAction: NotreportedRemedialPlan: 02/05/1987PollutionChar: NotreportedPrelimAssess: NotreportedWorkplan: NotreportedConfirmLeak: FJDStaffInitials: LocalAgencyLeadAgency: San Luis Obispo, San Luis ObispoCountyLocalAgency: NANCYDRIVECrossStreet: NotreportedContact: NotreportedRPAddress: NotreportedResponsibleParty: NotreportedEnforcementType: 8/17/87CloseDate: NotreportedEnforceDate: 08/17/1987ReviewDate: NotreportedStopDate: 06/24/1987EnterDate: 1/1/87DiscoveredDate: 02/05/1987ReleaseDate: TankClosureHowDiscovered: NotreportedHowStopped: UNKLeakCause: TankLeakSource: spreading or land farming) Excavate and Treat - remove contaminated soil and treat (includesAbatementMethod: NotreportedQuantity: WasteOilSubstance: SCaseType: NotreportedLocalCaseNum: 407CaseNumber: CaseClosedStatus: T0607900123GlobalID: San LuisObispoFacilityCounty: Central CoastRegionRegionalBoard: 3Region: LUST REG 3: HWTS 2418 ft.CERSSite1of2inclusterAK 0.458 mi.CUPA Listings Relative: Higher Actual: 186 ft. 1/4-1/2 CorteseSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE SWEEPSUST835AIRPORTDR N/A AK234 LUSTWINGSWESTAIRLINES, INC./DBA AMERICAN EAGLE S103673845 TC6926581.2s Page 861 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607900123GlobalID: NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: WINGS WEST AIRLINESINCName: CORTESE: 1NumberOfTanks: WASTEOILContent: WSTG: OILTankUse: 02-13-91ActiveDate: 250Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-000-010201-000001SWRCBTankId: NotreportedOwnerTankId: 11-27-90CreatedDate: 03-16-93ActionDate: 03-16-93ReferralDate: NotreportedBoardOfEqualization: 1Number: 10201CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC./DBA AMERICANEAGLEName: SWEEPS UST: GAL. AND 1 @ 20,000 GAL. THAT WAS 4 YRS. OLD. TANK LEAK AND FOR JET "A" TANK IS PIPING LEAK. THERE WAS 1 TANK @ 250 ABLE TO DIG AND AERATE ON SITE. SOURCE OF DISCHARGE FOR WASTE OILISSummary: 31S/12E-12G03MAssignedName: 0DistanceFromWell: WELL01WellName: RHODESRANCHOWaterSystem: NotreportedOperator: NotreportedSuspended: NotreportedUSTCleanupFundID: 0Priority: NotreportedBeneficial: 10.24BasinPlan: NotreportedOrgName: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC./DBA AMERICAN EAGLE (Continued)S103673845 TC6926581.2s Page 862 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 451004SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINESINCName: 8057817560,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: UST CASE WORKER - SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFEntityName: Local AgencyCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank CleanupSiteCERSDescription: T0607900123CERSID: 239231SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: WINGS WEST AIRLINESINCName: CERS: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020138RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (1-5 WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1126ProgramElementCode: FA0014680FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORT DR STE101Address: SLO SKYWESTMAINTENANCEName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0020139RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0014680FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORT DR STE101Address: SLO SKYWESTMAINTENANCEName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC./DBA AMERICAN EAGLE (Continued) S103673845 TC6926581.2s Page 863 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedInactiveDate: 2020-06-23 15:06:06.79000IssuedEPAIDDate: Research and Development inNanotechnologyNAICSDescription: 541713NAICSCode: 2020-06-23 15:06:06.790CreateDate: CAL000455233EPAID: 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 835 AIRPORTDRFacilityAddress: STELLAR EXPLORATIONINCFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 2020-06-23 15:06:06.79000IssuedEPAIDDate: Research & Development inNanotechnologyNAICSDescription: 541713NAICSCode: 2020-06-23 15:06:06.790CreateDate: CAL000455233EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 835 AIRPORTDRContactAddress: TOMASSVITEKContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 835 AIRPORTDROwnerAddress: STELLAR EXPLORATIONINCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 835 AIRPORTDRMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 07/24/2020LastActDate: 06/23/2020CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000455233EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: STELLAR EXPLORATIONINCName: HWTS: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: LOSANGELESAffiliationCity: 7000 WORLD WYWEST7AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: JAMES TBONDEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110043336100CERSID: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC./DBA AMERICAN EAGLE (Continued)S103673845 TC6926581.2s Page 864 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 93401FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 835 AIRPORTDRFacilityAddress: STELLAR EXPLORATIONINCFacilityName: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC./DBA AMERICAN EAGLE (Continued) S103673845 LeakReportedAction: 02/05/1987Date: OtherActionType: T0607900123GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 01/01/1987Date: OtherActionType: T0607900123GlobalId: LUST: 8057817560PhoneNumber: NotreportedEmail: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: NotreportedAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFOrganizationName: UST CASEWORKERContactName: Local AgencyCaseworkerContactType: T0607900123GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedSiteHistory: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotentialContaminantsofConcern: SoilPotentialMediaAffect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: NotreportedFileLocation: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFLocalAgency: 407RBCaseNumber: USTCaseWorker: 08/17/1987StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: 120.6399866Longitude: 35.2394477Latitude: T0607900123GlobalId: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607900123GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITYOFLeadAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: WINGS WEST AIRLINESINCName: LUST: 2418 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster AK 0.458 mi.HIST CORTESE Relative: Higher Actual: 186 ft. 1/4-1/2 EMISANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE CUPAListings835AIRPORT N/A AK235 LUSTWINGSWESTAIRLINES, INC.S103949822 TC6926581.2s Page 865 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: EMI: 120.64233Longitude: 35.24061Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0002480RecordId: HAZWASTE GEN (6+ WASTE STREAMS)Program Element: 1129ProgramElementCode: FA0002480FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 120.64233Longitude: 35.24061Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0001927RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 11+ HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0728ProgramElementCode: FA0002480FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 120.64233Longitude: 35.24061Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007012RecordId: STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0705ProgramElementCode: FA0002480FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: 08/17/1987StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607900123GlobalId: 02/05/1987StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607900123GlobalId: 01/01/1987StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607900123GlobalId: LUST: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. (Continued) S103949822 TC6926581.2s Page 866 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2003Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934030000City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2002Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934030000City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2001Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934030000City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. (Continued)S103949822 TC6926581.2s Page 867 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 08612928ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0912TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2006Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934030000City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1171056ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 124TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2005Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934030000City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.1171056ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.124TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2004Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934030000City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. (Continued)S103949822 TC6926581.2s Page 868 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2009Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2008Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 08612928ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0912TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2007Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934030000City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. (Continued)S103949822 TC6926581.2s Page 869 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2012Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2011Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3728SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 2070FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2010Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRAddress: AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. (Continued)S103949822 TC6926581.2s Page 870 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 407RegId: LTNKARegBy: 40FacilityCountyCode: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835AIRPORTedr_fadd1: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC.edr_fname: HIST CORTESE: NotreportedPart. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: NotreportedParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.00336ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.00336TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3721SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 3078FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2019Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 835 AIRPORTDRIVEAddress: ACIJETName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. (Continued) S103949822 CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UNITED PARCELSERVICEName: LUST: CERS CIWQS WDS NPDES CUPA Listings Cortese 2458 ft.CHMIRS 0.466 mi.CERS TANKS Relative: Higher Actual: 198 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPSUSTSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93456 ENE CERS HAZWASTE3601SACRAMENTO N/A 236 LUSTUNITEDPARCELSERVICE 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 871 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 03/28/1997StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: T0607900066GlobalId: 01/12/1993StatusDate: Open - SiteAssessmentStatus: T0607900066GlobalId: 01/12/1993StatusDate: Open - Case BeginDateStatus: T0607900066GlobalId: LUST: LeakStoppedAction: 10/13/1993Date: OtherActionType: T0607900066GlobalId: LeakReportedAction: 10/13/1993Date: OtherActionType: T0607900066GlobalId: LeakDiscoveryAction: 10/13/1993Date: OtherActionType: T0607900066GlobalId: LUST: 8057815544PhoneNumber: lgrossman@co.slo.ca.usEmail: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: PO BOX1489Address: SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYOrganizationName: LinneaGrossmanContactName: Local AgencyCaseworkerContactType: T0607900066GlobalId: LUST: NotreportedSiteHistory: GasolinePotentialContaminantsofConcern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: NotreportedLocalCaseNumber: NotreportedFileLocation: SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYLocalAgency: 2432RBCaseNumber: NotreportedCaseWorker: 03/28/1997StatusDate: Completed - CaseClosedStatus: 120.6433Longitude: 35.2561Latitude: T0607900066GlobalId: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607900066GeoTrack: LUST CleanupSiteCaseType: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 872 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedSuspended: NotreportedUSTCleanupFundID: LOP/MODERATE - POTENTIAL WATERIMPACTPriority: NotreportedBeneficial: 10.24BasinPlan: NotreportedOrgName: 1MtbeFuel: 0MtbeConcentratn: NotreportedGrndWtrQualifier: NotreportedSoilQualifier: 35.2542789 / -120.640773Lat/Long: NTMTBETested: Max MTBE Data: NotreportedMaxMTBESoil: NotreportedMaxMTBEGrndWtr: MTBE Class: NotreportedFunding: 0InterimAction: USTPilotProgram: Monitoring: NotreportedRemedialAction: NotreportedRemedialPlan: Pollution Char: NotreportedPrelimAssess: 1/12/93Workplan: NotreportedConfirmLeak: FJDStaffInitials: RegionalBoardLeadAgency: 40000LocalAgency: NotreportedCrossStreet: NotreportedContact: 25201 PASEO DEALICIARPAddress: MR. RAYSHAWResponsibleParty: NotreportedEnforcementType: 3/28/97CloseDate: NotreportedEnforceDate: 03/28/1997ReviewDate: 10/13/93StopDate: 04/08/1994EnterDate: 10/13/93DiscoveredDate: 10/13/1993ReleaseDate: TankClosureHowDiscovered: NotreportedHowStopped: UNKLeakCause: TankLeakSource: UAbatementMethod: NotreportedQuantity: GasolineSubstance: OCaseType: NotreportedLocalCaseNum: 2432CaseNumber: CaseClosedStatus: T0607900066GlobalID: San LuisObispoFacilityCounty: Central CoastRegionRegionalBoard: 3Region: LUST REG 3: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 873 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDateCompleted: NotreportedOESTime: NotreportedOESDate: 12/07/2011OESnotification: 1-7246OESIncidentNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA92401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: NotreportedName: CHMIRS: Underground StorageTankCERSDescription: 10416094CERSID: 79285SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS - SAN LUISOBISPOName: CERS TANKS: 1NumberOfTanks: REGUNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTankUse: 08-26-93ActiveDate: 12000Capacity: ATankStatus: 40-023-000598-000001SWRCBTankId: 1OwnerTankId: 02-15-94CreatedDate: 02-15-94ActionDate: 08-26-93ReferralDate: 44-025171BoardOfEqualization: 1Number: 598CompNumber: ActiveStatus: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 3601SACRAMENTOAddress: UNITED PARCELSERVICEName: SWEEPS UST: Hazardous WasteGeneratorCERSDescription: 10416094CERSID: 79285SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS - SAN LUISOBISPOName: CERS HAZ WASTE: 1/12/93)THIS CASE IS CLOSED REGARDING PETROLEUM CONTAMINATIONS IN GROUND WATER AT (UPS) SITE BOB WILSON, SAID THEY NEED NOTHER WEEK TO FINISH TECHNICALREPORTSummary: 4000723-001GENAssignedName: 0DistanceFromWell: LPA REPORTED PRIMARYSOURCEWellName: PLUMBERS & STEAMFITTERS - INACTIVEWaterSystem: NotreportedOperator: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 874 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: NotreportedNumberofFatalities: NotreportedNumberofInjuries: 90Evacuations: NotreportedSubstance #3: NotreportedSubstance #2: NotreportedUnknown: 0.1QuantityReleased: HydrochloricAcidSubstance: NotreportedEDate: NotreportedSiteType: YesContained: NotreportedAmount: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentAdminAgency: 12/7/2011IncidentDate: UPSAgency: 2011Year: 830Date/Time: NotreportedOther: Liters(s)Measure: NotreportedType: NotreportedWhatHappened: NotreportedContainment: ContractorCleanupBy: IndustrialPlantSpillSite: NotreportedWaterway: NoWaterwayInvolved: NotreportedFacilityTelephone: NotreportedReportDate: NotreportedReportingOfficerName/ID: NotreportedCompanyName: NotreportedCADOTPUC/ICC Number: NotreportedVehicleIdNumber: NotreportedVehicleState: NotreportedVehicleLicenseNumber: NotreportedVehicleMake/year: NotreportedOthersNumberOfFatalities: NotreportedOthersNumberOfInjuries: NotreportedOthersNumberOfDecontaminated: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Fatalities: NotreportedRespondingAgencyPersonel # Of Injuries: NotreportedRespAgncyPersonel # Of Decontaminated: NotreportedMoreThanTwoSubstancesInvolved?: NotreportedPropertyManagement: NotreportedEstimatedTemperature: NotreportedSurroundingArea: NotreportedTimeCompleted: NotreportedTimeNotified: NotreportedAgencyIncidentNumber: NotreportedAgencyIdNumber: NotreportedPropertyUse: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 875 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0004810FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS - SAN LUISOBISPOName: 120.64205Longitude: 35.25498Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007715RecordId: SLO CITY - RENEWAL - UST ANNUAL PERMITFEEProgramElement: 0351ProgramElementCode: FA0004810FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS - SAN LUISOBISPOName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: ActiveOpenFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: activeFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: NotreportedSiteCode: NotreportedStatusDate: COMPLETED - CASECLOSEDCleanupStatus: LUST CLEANUPSITESite/Facility Type: T0607900066GlobalID: NotreportedEnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UNITED PARCELSERVICEName: CORTESE: work approximately two hours later. a precaution. Caller states evacuees returned to states approximately 90 people were evacuated as released due to the cap was unsecure. Caller Fire Dept responded and advised substance Caller states a package was releasing fumes. TheDescription: NotreportedComments: NotreportedFatals: NotreportedInjuries: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 876 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStatus: 90015DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: LosAngelesDischargeCity: United ParcelServiceDischargeName: 1201 W OlympicBlvdDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 11/15/1992EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 340I009379WDID: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: 185704RegulatoryMeasureID: 0AgencyNumber: 3Region: CAS000001NPDESNumber: ActiveFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS SAN LUIS OBISPOCASLOName: NPDES: 120.64205Longitude: 35.25498Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007713RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0004810FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS - SAN LUISOBISPOName: 120.64205Longitude: 35.25498Latitude: Active, billableStatus: 01StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007712RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0004810FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS - SAN LUISOBISPOName: 120.64205Longitude: 35.25498Latitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007714RecordId: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 877 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 510-453-2090EmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: repowell@ups.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: 510-373-6874OperatorContactPhone: District Plant EngineeringManagerOperatorContactTitle: CarlosMedinaOperatorContact: 94621OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: OaklandOperatorCity: 8400 PardeeDriveOperatorAddress: United Parcel Service OaklandHubOperatorName: repowell@ups.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 916-373-6874ContactPhone: District EnvironmentalCoordinatorContactTitle: RamonaPowellContact: SqFtPlaceSizeUnit: 140020PlaceSize: 11/15/1992StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 11/15/1992ProcessedDate: 05/09/2008ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I009379WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 185704RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedStatusDate: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 878 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 94621DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: OaklandDischargeCity: 8400 PardeeDriveDischargeAddress: United Parcel Service OaklandHubDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 11/15/1992EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I009379WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 185704RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 4215-Courier Services Except byAirPrimarySic: 09-DEC-16CertificationDate: President, North CaliforniaDistrictCertifierTitle: CARLOSMEDINACertifier: San Louis ObispoCreekReceivingWaterName: NDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 879 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 340I009379WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS SAN LUIS OBISPOCASLOName: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 880 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 510-373-6874OperatorContactPhone: District Plant EngineeringManagerOperatorContactTitle: CarlosMedinaOperatorContact: 94621OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: OaklandOperatorCity: 8400 PardeeDriveOperatorAddress: United Parcel Service OaklandHubOperatorName: repowell@ups.comContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: 916-373-6874ContactPhone: District EnvironmentalCoordinatorContactTitle: RamonaPowellContact: SqFtPlaceSizeUnit: 140020PlaceSize: 11/15/1992StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 11/15/1992ProcessedDate: 05/09/2008ReceivedDate: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: 340I009379WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: NotreportedOrderNumber: 185704RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 90015OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: LosAngelesOperatorCity: 1201 W OlympicBlvdOperatorAddress: United ParcelServiceOperatorName: 11/15/1992StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: IndustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 881 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 94621DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: OaklandDischargeCity: 8400 PardeeDriveDischargeAddress: United Parcel Service OaklandHubDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 11/15/1992EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: IndustrialProgramType: 340I009379WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 97-03-DWQOrderNumber: 185704RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000001NPDESNumber: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: 4215-Courier Services Except byAirPrimarySic: 09-DEC-16CertificationDate: President, North CaliforniaDistrictCertifierTitle: CARLOSMEDINACertifier: San Louis ObispoCreekReceivingWaterName: NDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: 510-453-2090EmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: CaliforniaDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: PrivateBusinessOperatorType: repowell@ups.comOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 882 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 883 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3601 Sacramento Dr, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: United ParcelServiceAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTOSTREETAddress: UPSName: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, suchasComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional boardorderTreatToWater: NotreportedPOTW: NotreportedReclamation: 0BaselineFlow: 0DesignFlow: NotreportedSecondaryWasteType: NotreportedSecondaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedWaste2: NotreportedWasteType2: NotreportedPrimaryWaste: NotreportedPrimaryWasteType: NotreportedSICCode2: 0SICCode: PrivateAgencyType: 2136121890AgencyTelephone: MANAGERDISTRICTAgencyContact: Los Angeles900153905AgencyCity,St,Zip: 1201 W OlympicBlvdAgencyAddress: UNITED PARCELSERAgencyName: MANAGERCENTERFacilityContact: 8055447184FacilityTelephone: 3Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining7NPDESNumber: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge thatisFacilityStatus: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquidorFacilityType: Central Coastal40I009379FacilityID: SAN LUISOBISPOCity: 3601 SacramentoDrAddress: UNITED PARCELSERName: WDS: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 884 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leaking Underground Storage Tank CleanupSiteCERSDescription: T0607900066CERSID: 209774SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UNITED PARCELSERVICEName: CERS: 120.642081Longitude: 35.254757Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 11/15/1992EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000001NPDESNumber: 340I009379WDID: 2014-0057-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterindustrialRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: INDSTWProgram: 3Region: 4215SIC/NAICS: Industrial - Courier Services Except byAirPlace/Project Type: 1201 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA90015AgencyAddress: United ParcelServiceAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS SAN LUIS OBISPOCASLOName: 120.64208Longitude: 35.25476Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: 02/10/2015TerminationDate: 02/05/2014EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000002NPDESNumber: 340C368870WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterconstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: TerminatedRegulatoryMeasureStatus: CONSTWProgram: 3Region: NotreportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - CommercialPlace/Project Type: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 885 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoViolationsFound: 10-01-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: UST and related systems. All t On site to witness annual Monitoring System Certification forDieselEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-14-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: turbine sump. Equipment to be Diesel product line secondary containment penetration boot failedinEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: 03-10-2017EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: USTViolationProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentViolationDivision: Returned to compliance on 04/18/2017.Violation Notes: containment testing). Failure to maintain secondary containment (e.g. failure ofsecondaryViolationDescription: 25290.2(c), 25291(a)(2), 25292(e) Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.7, Section(s) 25290.1(c), HSC 6.7 25290.1(c), 25290.2(c), 25291(a)(2), 25292(e) - CaliforniaCitation: 03-10-2017ViolationDate: UPS - San LuisObispoSiteName: 79285SiteID: Violations: Chemical StorageFacilitiesCERSDescription: 10416094CERSID: 79285SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS - SAN LUISOBISPOName: 8057815544,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SAN LUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: PO BOX1489AffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: LINNEA GROSSMAN - SAN LUIS OBISPOCOUNTYEntityName: Local AgencyCaseworkerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 886 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 03-10-2017EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: monitoring certification successf HMBP has been updatged and submitted to CERS web page. AnnualEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-01-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-01-2014EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via CERS database. Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-16-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: systems tested passed. Facilit Tri-ennial SB 989 Testing of UST secondary containment systems - allEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 03-21-2014EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Annual Monitor Certification, all ok.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-11-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: electronically via CERS for 2015. N Hazardous Materials Business Plan has been updated andsubmittedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 887 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: diesel fuel tank. All sensors wor On site to witness annual UST Monitoring System CertificationforEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-23-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Submit Portal. Good employee HMBP has been updated and submitted electronically and submitted toEZEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-23-2019EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: System Certification. All te On site to witness annual Underground Storage Tank (Diesel) MonitoringEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-16-2016EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: no problems. HMBP has been u On site for annual Monitoring system certification - all tests passed,Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-15-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: documentation. HMBP is current for CY 2018. Good employee training programandEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-14-2018EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: penetration boot in turbine s SB 989 Testing of secondary testing systems - only problem wasfailedEvalNotes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: YesViolationsFound: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 888 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: diesel fuel tank. All tests succe On site to witness annual monitoring system certification foroneEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-01-2015EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-24-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-15-2017EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: USTEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: Subsequent test passed and fac Penetration boot for diesel product piping was removed and replaced.Eval Notes: Other, not routine, done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 04-18-2017EvalDate: Other/UnknownEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: All else ok. Business Plan needs to be updated to reflect changes in Management.Eval Notes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 10-11-2013EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEvalProgram: San Luis Obispo City FireDepartmentEvalDivision: NotreportedEvalNotes: Routine done by localagencyEvalType: NoViolationsFound: 09-24-2020EvalDate: Compliance EvaluationInspectionEvalGeneralType: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 889 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Parcel Service, Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 91406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: VanNuysAffiliationCity: 16000 Arminta st, Attn: PlantEngineeringAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MailingAddressEntityName: Facility MailingAddressAffiliationTypeDesc: 510) 453-2090,Affiliation Phone: 91406AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: VanNuysAffiliationCity: 16000 ArmintaStAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Parcel Service, Inc.Entity Name: UST TankOperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: PresidentEntityTitle: JrindaShawEntityName: IdentificationSignerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: 92805AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: AnaheimAffiliationCity: 1331 S. VernonAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MarcusGluckEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: 120.642430Longitude: 35.254490Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: NotreportedCoordName: 10416094ProgramID: HWGEnvIntTypeCode: UPS - San LuisObispoFacilityName: 79285SiteID: Coordinates: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 890 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CarlosMedinaEntityName: UST PermitApplicantAffiliationTypeDesc: 510) 453-2090,Affiliation Phone: 30328AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: GAAffiliationState: AtlantaAffiliationCity: 55 Glenlake Parkway, NEAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Parcel Service, Inc.Entity Name: PropertyOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 510) 453-2090,Affiliation Phone: 30328AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: GAAffiliationState: AtlantaAffiliationCity: 55 Glenlake Parkway, NEAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Parcel Service, Inc.Entity Name: LegalOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: 805) 781-5544,Affiliation Phone: 93406AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 2156 SierraWayAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: SLO County EnvHealthEntityName: CUPADistrictAffiliationTypeDesc: 510) 453-2090,Affiliation Phone: 30328AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: GAAffiliationState: AtlantaAffiliationCity: 55 Glenlake Parkway, NEAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Parcel Service, Inc.Entity Name: UST Property OwnerNameAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Parcel Service, Inc.Entity Name: ParentCorporationAffiliationTypeDesc: 213) 760-3217,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued)1000399430 TC6926581.2s Page 891 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Affiliation Phone: 90015AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: LosAngelesAffiliationCity: 1201 W OlympicBlvdAffiliationAddress: OperatorEntityTitle: United ParcelServiceEntityName: Owner/OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Industrial Facility StormWaterCERSDescription: 269714CERSID: 545580SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3601 SACRAMENTODRAddress: UPS SAN LUIS OBISPOCASLOName: 510) 453-2090,Affiliation Phone: 91406AffiliationZip: UnitedStatesAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: VanNuysAffiliationCity: 16000 ArmintaStAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: United Parcel Service, Inc.Entity Name: UST TankOwnerAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: MarcusGluckEntityName: DocumentPreparerAffiliationTypeDesc: 510) 453-2090,Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: NotreportedAffiliationCity: NotreportedAffiliationAddress: District Plant Engineering AreaManagerEntityTitle: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (Continued) 1000399430 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 990 INDUSTRIALWAYAddress: FORMER ELECTRONIC RECYCLERFACILITYName: ENVIROSTOR: 3127 ft. 0.592 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 203 ft. 1/2-1 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 ENE 990 INDUSTRIAL WAY N/A 237 ENVIROSTORFORMERELECTRONICRECYCLERFACILITY S120052858 TC6926581.2s Page 892 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: Approved by U.S. EPA.Comments: 06/08/2017CompletedDate: PA/SI SiteScreeningCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: CAN000903698AliasName: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60002456AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102325AliasName: SOIL, SURFWPotentialDescription: 31000-NOConfirmedCOC: NONE SPECIFIED No ContaminantsfoundPotentialCOC: RECYCLING - OTHERPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6392Longitude: 35.25349Latitude: EPAGrantFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: EPA - PASISpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: StevenBeckerSupervisor: WilliamMartinezProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 2Acres: EvaluationSiteTypeDetailed: EvaluationSiteType: 102325SiteCode: 07/11/2018StatusDate: No ActionRequiredStatus: 60002456FacilityID: FORMER ELECTRONIC RECYCLER FACILITY (Continued) S120052858 TC6926581.2s Page 893 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedPermitRenewalsWorkloadUniverse: Not on theBaseline2018GPRARenewalsBaseline: Not on theBaseline2018GPRAPermitBaseline: NotreportedTreatmentStorageandDisposalType: NoCommercialTSDIndicator: NotreportedSub-Part K Indicator: NNHazardousSecondaryMaterialIndicator: NotreportedFederalFacilityIndicator: Active Site State-Reg Handler: NotreportedActiveSiteState-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NotreportedActiveSiteConverterTreatmentstorageandDisposalFacility: NotreportedActiveSiteFed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederalUniversalWaste: NoUniversalWasteDestinationFacility: NoUniversalWasteIndicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUndergroundInjectionControl: NoSmeltingMeltingandRefiningFurnaceExemption: NoSmallQuantityOn-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecyclerActivitywithStorage: NoTransferFacilityActivity: NoTransporterActivity: NoMixedWasteGenerator: NoImporterActivity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorName: CountyOwnerType: COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: 901 AIRPORTDRMailingAddress: NotreportedStateDistrict: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: HandlerActivitiesActiveSiteIndicator: NotreportedAccessibility: NotreportedBiennialReportCycle: NotreportedNon-Notifier: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: CountyLandType: 09EPARegion: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactFax: 805-781-5124ContactTelephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93408ContactCity,State,Zip: 1087 SANTA ROSASTContactAddress: GEORGEAKINContactName: CAD981409840EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401HandlerCity,State,Zip: 901 AIRPORTDRHandlerAddress: COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 20020621DateFormReceivedbyAgency: RCRA-SQG: 3335 ft.ECHO 0.632 mi.FINDS Relative: Higher Actual: 190 ft. 1/2-1 HISTUSTSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 ESE ENVIROSTOR901AIRPORTDR CAD981409840 238 RCRA-SQGCOUNTYOFSANLUISOBISPO 1000122524 TC6926581.2s Page 894 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: SILVERWasteDescription: D011WasteCode: MERCURYWasteDescription: D009WasteCode: LEADWasteDescription: D008WasteCode: CHROMIUMWasteDescription: D007WasteCode: CADMIUMWasteDescription: D006WasteCode: BARIUMWasteDescription: D005WasteCode: ARSENICWasteDescription: D004WasteCode: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NotreportedManifestBroker: NotreportedRecyclerActivityWithoutStorage: NoExporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoImporterofSpentLeadAcidBatteries: NoRecognizedTrader-Exporter: NoRecognizedTrader-Importer: 20021007HandlerDateofLastChange: NotreportedFinancialAssuranceRequired: NoSignificantNon-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressedSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NoSignificantNon-Complier Universe: NotreportedFullEnforcementUniverse: NotreportedOperatingTSDFUniverse: N/AGroundwaterControlsIndicator: N/AHumanExposureControlsIndicator: NoInstitutionalControlIndicator: NoEnvironmentalControlIndicator: No NCAPSrankingCorrectiveActionPriorityRanking: NoTSDFsOnlySubjecttoCAunderDiscretionaryAuthUniverse: NoTSDFsPotentiallySubjecttoCAUnder3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubjecttoCorrectiveActionUniverse: NoCorrectiveActionWorkloadUniverse: No202GPRACorrectiveActionBaseline: NotreportedClosureWorkloadUniverse: NotreportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: NotreportedPermitProgressUniverse: NotreportedPermitWorkloadUniverse: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued) 1000122524 TC6926581.2s Page 895 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No ViolationsFoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: No NAICS CodesFoundNAICSCodes: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: YesCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 20020621ReceiveDate: NotreportedElectronicManifestBroker: NotreportedNonStorageRecyclerActivity: NoCurrentRecord: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryExporter: NoSpentLeadAcidBatteryImporter: NoRecognizedTraderExporter: NoRecognizedTraderImporter: NoLargeQuantityHandlerofUniversalWaste: NotreportedStateDistrictOwner: Small QuantityGeneratorFederalWasteGeneratorDescription: COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOHandlerName: 19960901ReceiveDate: Historic Generators: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 805-781-5200Owner/Operator Telephone: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93408Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 1087 SANTA ROSASTOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: CountyLegalStatus: COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: NotreportedOwner/Operator Email: NotreportedOwner/Operator Fax: NotreportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 415-555-1212Owner/Operator Telephone: NOT REQUIRED, ME99999Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Address: NotreportedDateEndedCurrent: NotreportedDateBecameCurrent: CountyLegalStatus: NOTREQUIREDOwner/Operator Name: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued) 1000122524 TC6926581.2s Page 896 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: NotreportedComments: 09/28/1999CompletedDate: Inventory Project Report (INPR)Completed Document Type: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 80000759AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102286AliasName: INPRAliasType: J09CA7088AliasName: Federal FacilityIDAliasType: CA99799F991000AliasName: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialDescription: NONESPECIFIEDConfirmedCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6424Longitude: 35.24014Latitude: DERAFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: NotreportedSpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: CleanupSacramentoDivisionBranch: CharlesRidenourSupervisor: CharlieRidenourProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 1Acres: FUDSSiteTypeDetailed: MilitaryEvaluationSiteType: 102286SiteCode: 01/23/2018StatusDate: Inactive - NeedsEvaluationStatus: 80000759FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CACity,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAIRPORTName: ENVIROSTOR: No EvaluationsFoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued)1000122524 TC6926581.2s Page 897 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System: Click Here: 110002697403RegistryID: FINDS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: 06TypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00012000TankCapacity: NotreportedYearInstalled: 1ContainerNum: 002TankNum: StockInventorLeakDetection: NotreportedContainerConstructionThickness: 06TypeofFuel: PRODUCTTankUsedfor: 00012000TankCapacity: NotreportedYearInstalled: 2ContainerNum: 001TankNum: 0002TotalTanks: LA HABRA, CA90631OwnerCity,St,Zip: 1201 S. BEACH BLVD.Owner Address: CHEVRON USA INC.Owner Name: 8055446464Telephone: COASTALAIRContactName: AIRPORTOtherType: OtherFacilityType: 00000021452FacilityID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002B74F.pdfURL: 0002B74FFileNumber: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 935 AIRPORTDRAddress: SAN LUIS OBISPOAIRPORTName: HIST UST: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued) 1000122524 TC6926581.2s Page 898 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 901 AIRPORTDRAddress: COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPOName: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002697403DFRURL: 110002697403RegistryID: 1000122524Envid: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (Continued) 1000122524 NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: NotreportedComments: NotreportedCompletedDate: NotreportedCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: NotreportedCompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60002303AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102282AliasName: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialDescription: NONESPECIFIEDConfirmedCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6415Longitude: 35.23419Latitude: Federal DOEfundedFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: EPA - PASISpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: KevinShaddySupervisor: NotreportedProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 0.1Acres: EvaluationSiteTypeDetailed: EvaluationSiteType: 102282SiteCode: 04/07/2016StatusDate: Inactive - NeedsEvaluationStatus: 60002303FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 390 BUCKLEYROADAddress: NOLLINCORPORATEDName: ENVIROSTOR: 3994 ft. 0.756 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 183 ft. 1/2-1 HWTSSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SE HAZNET390BUCKLEYRDRR #3 N/A 239 ENVIROSTORNOLLINCORPORATED S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 899 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.28773Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2013Year: 0.25437Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAD044429835TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2014Year: 0.2502Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2015Year: 0.06255Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.06300Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: percent 134 - Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than10CAWasteCode: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2018Year: 390 BUCKLEY RD # 3MailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8055433602Telephone: JOHNNOLLContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 390 BUCKLEY RD RR #3Address: NOLLINCORPORATEDName: HAZNET: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 900 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: CLEANHARBORSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005171136SKSManifestID: 20151229ReceiptDate: 9/21/2016 18:30:44CreationDate: 20151216ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2016Year: Additional Info: 18 additional CA HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 0.09591Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2010Year: 0.09591Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2011Year: 0.19182Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613976TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2011Year: 0.2919Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, Etc.)CA Waste Code: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2012Year: 0.675Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: CAT000613893TSDEPAID: CAL000077677Gepaid: 2013Year: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 901 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004944640SKSManifestID: 20150708ReceiptDate: 1/20/2016 22:15:43CreationDate: 20150629ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005137663SKSManifestID: 20150929ReceiptDate: 2/26/2016 22:15:47CreationDate: 20150922ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 902 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004606286SKSManifestID: 20150120ReceiptDate: 7/9/2015 22:15:09CreationDate: 20150113ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004903511SKSManifestID: 20150415ReceiptDate: 9/11/2015 22:15:40CreationDate: 20150409ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 903 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20120320ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003059564SKSManifestID: 20120803ReceiptDate: 12/29/2012 22:15:14CreationDate: 20120725ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 003443800SKSManifestID: 20121206ReceiptDate: 4/17/2013 22:15:34CreationDate: 20121129ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2012Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 904 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD131838849TransEPAID: 96209657ManifestID: 19960220ReceiptDate: 10/10/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19960212ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838549TransEPAID: 95733036ManifestID: 19960819ReceiptDate: 5/30/1997 0:00:00CreationDate: 19960812ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 1996Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 24WasteQuantity: 0.10008QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003043377SKSManifestID: 20120323ReceiptDate: 8/29/2012 22:15:11CreationDate: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 905 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005137663SKSManifestID: 20150929ReceiptDate: 2/26/2016 22:15:47CreationDate: 20150922ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: CLEANHARBORSTrans2Name: MAD039322250Trans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 005171136SKSManifestID: 20151229ReceiptDate: 9/21/2016 18:30:44CreationDate: 20151216ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2015Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 906 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004903511SKSManifestID: 20150415ReceiptDate: 9/11/2015 22:15:40CreationDate: 20150409ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004944640SKSManifestID: 20150708ReceiptDate: 1/20/2016 22:15:43CreationDate: 20150629ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 907 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 002720090SKSManifestID: 20111123ReceiptDate: 4/14/2012 20:30:11CreationDate: 20111116ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2011Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004606286SKSManifestID: 20150120ReceiptDate: 7/9/2015 22:15:09CreationDate: 20150113ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 908 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003581235FLEManifestID: 20110321ReceiptDate: 8/25/2011 18:30:11CreationDate: 20110308ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 004262858FLEManifestID: 20110719ReceiptDate: 12/15/2011 18:30:29CreationDate: 20110712ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 909 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2004Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: D001AdditionalCode3: D018AdditionalCode2: D039AdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.10425QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D040RCRACode: 741 - Liquids with halogenated organic compounds > 1000 mg/lWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 002342390SKSManifestID: 20100519ReceiptDate: 12/16/2010 18:31:00CreationDate: 20100505ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 003651697FLEManifestID: 20101118ReceiptDate: 4/22/2011 18:30:28CreationDate: 20101103ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2010Year: Additional Info: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 910 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23713544ManifestID: 20040929ReceiptDate: 12/21/2004 18:30:50CreationDate: 20040920ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.1251QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23713544ManifestID: 20040929ReceiptDate: 12/21/2004 18:30:50CreationDate: 20040920ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 60WasteQuantity: 0.2502QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23726990ManifestID: 20041201ReceiptDate: 1/28/2005 18:31:06CreationDate: 20041109ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 911 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23517023ManifestID: 20040810ReceiptDate: 1/4/2005 18:33:27CreationDate: 20040729ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 28WasteQuantity: 0.11676QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23517023ManifestID: 20040810ReceiptDate: 1/4/2005 18:33:27CreationDate: 20040729ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 912 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20040406ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23498959ManifestID: 20040610ReceiptDate: 11/1/2004 9:00:46CreationDate: 20040601ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.10425QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23498959ManifestID: 20040610ReceiptDate: 11/1/2004 9:00:46CreationDate: 20040601ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 913 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22574236ManifestID: 20040218ReceiptDate: 8/20/2004 9:31:41CreationDate: 20040204ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.10425QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23469928ManifestID: 20040415ReceiptDate: 10/14/2004 15:19:37CreationDate: 20040406ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 6WasteQuantity: 0.02502QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 23469928ManifestID: 20040415ReceiptDate: 10/14/2004 15:19:37CreationDate: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 914 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21937484ManifestID: 20021031ReceiptDate: 2/10/2003 18:31:16CreationDate: 20021023ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.1251QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 22187899ManifestID: 20021217ReceiptDate: 4/2/2003 18:31:15CreationDate: 20021209ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2002Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 915 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.10425QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21740529ManifestID: 20020722ReceiptDate: 9/18/2002 18:31:39CreationDate: 20020712ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.1251QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21900319ManifestID: 20020905ReceiptDate: 1/27/2003 18:32:25CreationDate: 20020830ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.1251QuantityTons: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 916 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21484244ManifestID: 20020131ReceiptDate: 5/29/2002 11:15:30CreationDate: 20020128ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.1251QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21579319ManifestID: 20020402ReceiptDate: 7/17/2002 18:34:07CreationDate: 20020326ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 29WasteQuantity: 0.12093QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21592571ManifestID: 20020528ReceiptDate: 7/19/2002 15:57:28CreationDate: 20020522ShipmentDate: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 917 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 97243532ManifestID: 19980330ReceiptDate: 5/26/1998 0:00:00CreationDate: 19980326ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 98540059ManifestID: 19981119ReceiptDate: 1/13/1999 0:00:00CreationDate: 19981110ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 1998Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 40WasteQuantity: 0.1668QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 918 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 93356447ManifestID: 19940324ReceiptDate: 10/5/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19940318ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 93630520ManifestID: 19940901ReceiptDate: 3/26/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19940826ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 1994Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 919 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 006888344FLEManifestID: 20130808ReceiptDate: 12/19/2013 22:15:06CreationDate: 20130731ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004015421SKSManifestID: 20131126ReceiptDate: 4/5/2014 22:15:10CreationDate: 20131121ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2013Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 920 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19930922ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 1993Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 003397642SKSManifestID: 20130411ReceiptDate: 8/25/2013 22:15:09CreationDate: 20130403ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: D005AdditionalCode4: D006AdditionalCode3: D007AdditionalCode2: D008AdditionalCode1: PQuantityUnit: 1350WasteQuantity: 0.675QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D009RCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613893TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 003650488SKSManifestID: 20130411ReceiptDate: 8/25/2013 22:15:09CreationDate: 20130409ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 921 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22572476ManifestID: 20031219ReceiptDate: 8/12/2004 8:09:46CreationDate: 20031210ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2003Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 92691142ManifestID: 19930511ReceiptDate: 9/9/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19930507ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 93071679ManifestID: 19930928ReceiptDate: 9/12/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 922 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22521336ManifestID: 20031030ReceiptDate: 8/3/2004 15:03:33CreationDate: 20031022ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.10425QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22572476ManifestID: 20031219ReceiptDate: 8/12/2004 8:09:46CreationDate: 20031210ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 923 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22877317ManifestID: 20030903ReceiptDate: 7/29/2004 7:45:24CreationDate: 20030826ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 24WasteQuantity: 0.10008QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22521336ManifestID: 20031030ReceiptDate: 8/3/2004 15:03:33CreationDate: 20031022ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: NotreportedWasteQuantity: NotreportedQuantityTons: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 924 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22878867ManifestID: 20030717ReceiptDate: 7/23/2004 9:16:48CreationDate: 20030711ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.02085QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22878867ManifestID: 20030717ReceiptDate: 7/23/2004 9:16:48CreationDate: 20030711ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.10425QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22877317ManifestID: 20030903ReceiptDate: 7/29/2004 7:45:24CreationDate: 20030826ShipmentDate: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 925 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GQuantityUnit: 7WasteQuantity: 0.02919QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22443707ManifestID: 20030416ReceiptDate: 7/13/2003 18:31:11CreationDate: 20030411ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 32WasteQuantity: 0.13344QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: TXR000050930TransEPAID: 22380345ManifestID: 20030606ReceiptDate: 6/22/2004 9:47:57CreationDate: 20030530ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 20WasteQuantity: 0.0834QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 926 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 95437125ManifestID: 19950822ReceiptDate: 4/2/1996 0:00:00CreationDate: 19950816ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 1995Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 96811798ManifestID: 19970505ReceiptDate: 6/26/1997 0:00:00CreationDate: 19970502ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 1997Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 927 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 17WasteQuantity: 0.07089QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004660160SKSManifestID: 20141105ReceiptDate: 6/25/2015 22:15:29CreationDate: 20141030ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2014Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 5WasteQuantity: 0.0208QuantityTons: R01 - RecyclerMethCode: D011RCRACode: 541 - Photochemicals / photo processingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD981402522TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: CAD982433575Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAD131838849TransEPAID: 95276009ManifestID: 19950310ReceiptDate: 10/23/1995 0:00:00CreationDate: 19950301ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 928 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TXR000081205TransEPAID: 007489366FLEManifestID: 20140225ReceiptDate: 4/5/2014 22:15:21CreationDate: 20140212ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004339811SKSManifestID: 20140519ReceiptDate: 7/12/2014 22:15:17CreationDate: 20140506ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.09591QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: TXR000081205TransEPAID: 004304665SKSManifestID: 20140819ReceiptDate: 10/22/2014 22:15:04CreationDate: 20140731ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 929 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20001128ReceiptDate: 2/1/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20001120ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2000Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 180WasteQuantity: 0.7506QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982446858TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: EVERGREEN ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESTransName: CAD982413262TransEPAID: 002477129JJKManifestID: 20080404ReceiptDate: 5/21/2008 18:30:21CreationDate: 20080403ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2008Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 15WasteQuantity: 0.06255QuantityTons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NotreportedTSDFAltEPAID: CLEAN HARBORS WILMINGTONLLCTransName: CAD044429835TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMSINCTransName: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 930 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21310218ManifestID: 20011211ReceiptDate: 1/29/2002 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011206ShipmentDate: CAL000077677GenEPAID: 2001Year: Additional Info: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 30WasteQuantity: 0.1251QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 99805574ManifestID: 20000929ReceiptDate: 12/8/2000 0:00:00CreationDate: 20000927ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 32WasteQuantity: 0.1334QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 99667030ManifestID: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 931 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 31WasteQuantity: 0.1292QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21402268ManifestID: 20011023ReceiptDate: 1/16/2002 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011019ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: 0WasteQuantity: 0QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21402268ManifestID: 20011023ReceiptDate: 1/16/2002 0:00:00CreationDate: 20011019ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 23WasteQuantity: 0.0959QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 932 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/1/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010702ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 32WasteQuantity: 0.1334QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21114512ManifestID: 20010829ReceiptDate: 10/23/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010827ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: 0WasteQuantity: 0QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21114512ManifestID: 20010829ReceiptDate: 10/23/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010827ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 933 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20633613ManifestID: 20010514ReceiptDate: 7/10/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010510ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: NotreportedQuantityUnit: 0WasteQuantity: 0QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: NotreportedRCRACode: NotreportedWasteCodeDescription: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21137124ManifestID: 20010706ReceiptDate: 10/1/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010702ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 31WasteQuantity: 0.1292QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 21137124ManifestID: 20010706ReceiptDate: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 934 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 25WasteQuantity: 0.1042QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: SCR000074591Trans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20613130ManifestID: 20010316ReceiptDate: 5/16/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010312ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 26WasteQuantity: 0.1084QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: CAT000613976TSDFAltEPAID: NotreportedTransName: CAT000613976TSDFEPAID: NotreportedTrans2Name: NotreportedTrans2EPAID: NotreportedTransName: SCR000075150TransEPAID: 20633613ManifestID: 20010514ReceiptDate: 7/10/2001 0:00:00CreationDate: 20010510ShipmentDate: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NotreportedAdditionalCode2: NotreportedAdditionalCode1: GQuantityUnit: 3WasteQuantity: 0.0125QuantityTons: H01 - TransferStationMethCode: D039RCRACode: 213 - Hydrocarbon solvents (benzene, hexane, Stoddard, etc.Waste Code Description: NotreportedTSDFAltName: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 TC6926581.2s Page 935 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 934010000FacilityZip: CAFacilityState: NotreportedFacilityCounty: SAN LUISOBISPOFacilityCity: NotreportedFacilityAddress2: 390 BUCKLEY RD RR #3FacilityAddress: NOLLINCORPORATEDFacilityName: NotreportedInactiveDate: 1992-05-07 00:00:00IssuedEPAIDDate: Precision Turned ProductManufacturingNAICSDescription: 332721NAICSCode: 2010-11-22 13:00:50.000CreateDate: CAL000077677EPAID: NAICS: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 390 BUCKLEY RD # 3ContactAddress: JOHNNOLLContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000OwnerCity,State,Zip: NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 390 BUCKLEY RD #3OwnerAddress: NOLLJOHNOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 390 BUCKLEY RDRT3MailingAddress: JOHN MNOLLMailingName: 07/22/2020LastActDate: 05/07/1992CreateDate: NotreportedInactiveDate: CAL000077677EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 390 BUCKLEY RD RR #3Address: NOLLINCORPORATEDName: HWTS: NotreportedAdditionalCode5: NotreportedAdditionalCode4: NotreportedAdditionalCode3: NOLL INCORPORATED (Continued)S113051504 Inactive - NeedsEvaluationStatus: 60002304FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYROADAddress: STRASBAUGHName: ENVIROSTOR: HWTS NON-CASE INFO CERS CIWQS 4289 ft.NPDES 0.812 mi.HAZNET Relative: Higher Actual: 186 ft. 1/2-1 EMISANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 SE CUPAListings825BUCKLEYROAD N/A 240 ENVIROSTORBUCKLEYMINISTORAGE S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 936 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0010046RecordId: HAZMAT DISCLOSURE - 1-4 HAZARDOUSMATERIALSProgramElement: 0726ProgramElementCode: FA0006387FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: CENTRAL COASTFABRICATORSName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: NotreportedComments: NotreportedCompletedDate: NotreportedCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: NotreportedCompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60002304AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102283AliasName: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialDescription: NONESPECIFIEDConfirmedCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6393Longitude: 35.23424Latitude: Federal DOEfundedFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: NotreportedSpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Cleanup SanJoaquinDivisionBranch: KevinShaddySupervisor: NotreportedProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 0.1Acres: EvaluationSiteTypeDetailed: EvaluationSiteType: 102283SiteCode: 04/07/2016StatusDate: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 937 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 5TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1997Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: R HOWARD STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 1TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1996Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: R HOWARD STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 1TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1995Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: R HOWARD STRASBAUGH, INCName: EMI: 120.64019Longitude: 35.23414Latitude: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 938 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2000Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 1ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 1TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1999Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 5ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 5TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 1998Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 5ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 939 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2003Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2002Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2001Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 940 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2006Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 36838791ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 3729TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2005Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.36838791ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.3729TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2004Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934010000City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 941 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 39516ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 4TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2008Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 36838791ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 3729TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2007Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93015City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 36838791ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 3729TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 942 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.39516ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.4TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2011Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.39516000000000001ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.40000000000000002TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2010Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0.39516000000000001ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0.40000000000000002TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2009Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 943 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2014Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2013Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2012Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 944 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2017Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: NotreportedPart. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: NotreportedParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2016Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0CarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: NotreportedConsolidatedEmissionReportingRule: NotreportedCommunityHealthAirPollutionInfoSystem: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYAPCDAirDistrictName: 3559SICCode: SLOAirDistrictName: 369FacilityID: SCCAirBasin: 40CountyCode: 2015Year: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0ParticulateMatterTons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 945 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San LuisObispoDischargeCity: HS BuckleyLLCDischargeName: 645 ClarionCourtDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 02/15/2018EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: ConstructionProgramType: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 340C382501WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: 495055RegulatoryMeasureID: 0AgencyNumber: 3Region: CAS000002NPDESNumber: ActiveFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYROADAddress: BUCKLEY MINISTORAGEName: NPDES: 0.05Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 343 - Unspecified organic liquidmixtureCAWasteCode: NVD980895338TSDEPAID: CAC002847259Gepaid: 2016Year: 0.875Tons: Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--NoDisposalMethod: 223 - Unspecified oil-containingwasteCAWasteCode: NVD980895338TSDEPAID: CAC002847259Gepaid: 2016Year: 825 BUCKLEYRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 8057825370Telephone: KIRKKINGSLEYContact: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934019101City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 825 BUCKLEY RD STE300Address: SLO BUCKLEY PROPERTIESLLCName: HAZNET: NotreportedPart. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: NotreportedParticulateMatterTons/Yr: NotreportedSOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: NotreportedNOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: NotreportedCarbonMonoxideEmissionsTons/Yr: 0ReactiveOrganicGasesTons/Yr: 0TotalOrganicHydrocarbonGasesTons/Yr: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued) S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 946 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 645 ClarionCourtDischargeAddress: HS BuckleyLLCDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 02/15/2018EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: ConstructionProgramType: 340C382501WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: 495055RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000002NPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 947 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San LuisObispoOperatorCity: 645 ClarionCourtOperatorAddress: HS BuckleyLLCOperatorName: 04/08/2020StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedDischargeZip: NotreportedDischargeState: NotreportedDischargeCity: NotreportedDischargeName: NotreportedDischargeAddress: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedEffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedProgramType: ConstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: 340C382501WDID: NotreportedOrderNumber: NotreportedPlaceID: NotreportedRegulatoryMeasureID: NotreportedAgencyNumber: NotreportedRegion: NotreportedNPDESNumber: NotreportedFacilityStatus: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYROADAddress: BUCKLEY MINISTORAGEName: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 948 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedConstypeCableLineInd: NotreportedConstypeBelowGroundInd: NotreportedConstypeAboveGroundInd: NotreportedEmergencyPhoneExt: NotreportedEmergencyPhone: NotreportedConstypeLinearUtilityInd: NotreportedDeveloperContactTitle: NotreportedDeveloperContact: NotreportedDeveloperZip: NotreportedDeveloperState: NotreportedDeveloperCity: NotreportedDeveloperAddress: NotreportedDeveloper: NotreportedOperatorType: NotreportedOperatorContactEmail: NotreportedOperatorContactPhoneExt: NotreportedOperatorContactPhone: NotreportedOperatorContactTitle: NotreportedOperatorContact: NotreportedOperatorZip: NotreportedOperatorState: NotreportedOperatorCity: NotreportedOperatorAddress: NotreportedOperatorName: NotreportedContactEmail: NotreportedContactPhoneExt: NotreportedContactPhone: NotreportedContactTitle: NotreportedContact: NotreportedPlaceSizeUnit: NotreportedPlaceSize: NotreportedStatusDate: NotreportedStatus: NotreportedProcessedDate: NotreportedReceivedDate: 93401DischargeZip: CaliforniaDischargeState: San LuisObispoDischargeCity: 645 ClarionCourtDischargeAddress: HS BuckleyLLCDischargeName: NotreportedTerminationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedExpirationDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: 02/15/2018EffectiveDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: NotreportedAdoptionDateOfRegulatoryMeasure: ConstructionProgramType: 340C382501WDID: NotreportedPlaceID: EnrolleeRegulatoryMeasureType: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: 495055RegulatoryMeasureID: 3Region: 0AgencyNumber: ActiveStatus: CAS000002NPDESNumber: NPDES as of 03/2018: 93401OperatorZip: CaliforniaOperatorState: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 949 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 527997SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYROADAddress: BUCKLEY MINISTORAGEName: CERS: 120.63365Longitude: 35.23118Latitude: 0Violationswithin5years: 0EnforcementActionswithin5years: NotreportedTTWQ: NotreportedComplexity: NotreportedMajor/Minor: NotreportedDesignFlow: NotreportedExpiration/Review Date: NotreportedTerminationDate: 02/15/2018EffectiveDate: NotreportedAdoptionDate: CAS000002NPDESNumber: 340C382501WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrderNumber: Storm waterconstructionRegulatoryMeasureType: ActiveRegulatoryMeasureStatus: CONSTWProgram: 3Region: NotreportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - CommercialPlace/Project Type: 645 Clarion Court, San Luis Obispo, CA93401AgencyAddress: HS BuckleyLLCAgency: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYROADAddress: BUCKLEY MINISTORAGEName: CIWQS: NotreportedTertiarySic: NotreportedSecondarySic: NotreportedPrimarySic: NotreportedCertificationDate: NotreportedCertifierTitle: NotreportedCertifier: NotreportedReceivingWaterName: NotreportedDirDischargeUswaterInd: NotreportedConstypeWaterSewerInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityInd: NotreportedConstypeUtilityDescription: NotreportedConstypeTransportInd: NotreportedConstypeResidentialInd: NotreportedConstypeReconsInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherInd: NotreportedConstypeOtherDescription: NotreportedConstypeIndustrialInd: NotreportedConstypeGasLineInd: NotreportedConstypeElectricalLineInd: NotreportedConstypeCommertialInd: NotreportedConstypeCommLineInd: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 950 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SANLUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 825 BUCKLEYROADAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CraigEdwardsEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110002915007CERSID: 71788SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: SANLUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 825 BUCKLEYROADAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KirkKingsleyEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: SANLUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 825 BUCKLEYROADAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: CraigEdwardsEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Waste DischargeRequirementsCERSDescription: 259238CERSID: 71788SiteID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYRDAddress: STRASBAUGH, INCName: Affiliation Phone: 93401AffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: CAAffiliationState: San LuisObispoAffiliationCity: 645 ClarionCourtAffiliationAddress: OperatorEntityTitle: HS BuckleyLLCEntityName: Owner/OperatorAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation: Construction StormWaterCERSDescription: 861920CERSID: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued) S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 951 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedOwnerAddress2: 825 BUCKLEYRDOwnerAddress: SLO BUCKLEY PROPERTIESLLCOwnerName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401MailingCity,State,Zip: NotreportedMailingAddress2: 825 BUCKLEYRDMailingAddress: NotreportedMailingName: 05/04/2016LastActDate: 02/02/2016CreateDate: 05/04/2016InactiveDate: CAC002847259EPAID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA934019101City,State,Zip: NotreportedAddress2: 825 BUCKLEY RD STE300Address: SLO BUCKLEY PROPERTIESLLCName: HWTS: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T10000010080Geotracker: 120.63939Longitude: 35.23424Latitude: NotreportedStopDescription: NotreportedStopMethod: NotreportedHowDiscoveredDescription: NotreportedHowDiscovered: 2010-10-05 00:00:00BeginDate: NotreportedSiteHistory: NotreportedPotentialMediaAffected: NotreportedPotentialContaminantsofConcern: NotreportedFileLocation: NotreportedLocCaseNumber: NotreportedRBCaseNumber: NotreportedLocalAgency: DTCaseWorker: CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3)Lead Agency: 01/27/2017StatusDate: InformationalItemStatus: Non-CaseInformationCaseType: T10000010080GlobalID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 825 BUCKLEYROADAddress: SLO BUCKLEY PROPERTIESLLCName: NON-CASE INFO: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: NotreportedAffiliationCountry: NotreportedAffiliationState: SANLUISOBISPOAffiliationCity: 825 BUCKLEYROADAffiliationAddress: NotreportedEntityTitle: KirkKingsleyEntityName: EnvironmentalContactAffiliationTypeDesc: Affiliation Phone: NotreportedAffiliationZip: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued)S100943090 TC6926581.2s Page 952 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: NotreportedContactAddress2: 825 BUCKLEYRDContactAddress: KIRKKINGSLEYContactName: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401OwnerCity,State,Zip: BUCKLEY MINI STORAGE (Continued) S100943090 NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: NotreportedScheduleAreaName: NotreportedFutureDueDate: NotreportedFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: NotreportedFutureAreaName: FACILITY IDENTIFIED DUN ANDBRADSTREETComments: 02/01/1983CompletedDate: DiscoveryCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 40500002AliasName: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialDescription: NONESPECIFIEDConfirmedCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPotentialCOC: NONESPECIFIEDPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6467Longitude: 35.26324Latitude: NotreportedFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: NotreportedSpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: CleanupSacramentoDivisionBranch: NotreportedSupervisor: NotreportedProgramManager: NONESPECIFIEDLeadAgency: NONESPECIFIEDRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: NotreportedAcres: HistoricalSiteTypeDetailed: HistoricalSiteType: NotreportedSiteCode: 03/25/1983StatusDate: No FurtherActionStatus: 40500002FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3045DUNCANAddress: BEDLO, INCName: ENVIROSTOR: 4625 ft. 0.876 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 230 ft. 1/2-1 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NE CUPAListings3045DUNCAN N/A 241 ENVIROSTORBEDLO, INC S100190339 TC6926581.2s Page 953 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007970RecordId: SLO CITY - AGT ANNUALPERMITProgramElement: 1251ProgramElementCode: FA0005109FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3045 DUNCANRDAddress: AUTO PARTSRECYCLINGName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007490RecordId: SLO CITY- WASTE GENERATOR (1-5 waste streams)Program Element: 1176ProgramElementCode: FA0005109FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3045 DUNCANRDAddress: AUTO PARTSRECYCLINGName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007489RecordId: SLO CITY-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLER 1-4ProgramElement: 0762ProgramElementCode: FA0005109FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3045 DUNCANRDAddress: AUTO PARTSRECYCLINGName: NotreportedLongitude: NotreportedLatitude: Inactive, non-billableStatus: 02StatusCode: NotreportedCrossStreet: PR0007491RecordId: SLO CITY- STATE SITESURCHARGEProgramElement: 0755ProgramElementCode: FA0005109FacilityId: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: 3045 DUNCANRDAddress: AUTO PARTSRECYCLINGName: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: NotreportedScheduleDueDate: NotreportedScheduleDocumentType: BEDLO, INC (Continued)S100190339 TC6926581.2s Page 954 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NotreportedStatus: NotreportedGlobalID: NotreportedIncidentDescription: NotreportedIssueDate: NotreportedDischargeDate: NotreportedFacilityType: NotreportedBoardFileNumber: NotreportedStaffInitials: NotreportedDateReported: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA91372City,State,Zip: DENNY’S AND BOB’SAddress: NORTH CALLE JOAQUINBETWEENName: NOTIFY 65: 4887 ft. 0.926 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 110 ft. 1/2-1 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 91372 West DENNY’S AND BOB’S N/A 242 Notify65NORTHCALLEJOAQUINBETWEEN S100179523 Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102043AliasName: PCodeAliasType: 102044AliasName: AQUI, SVPotentialDescription: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEConfirmedCOC: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotentialCOC : DRYCLEANINGPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6695Longitude: 35.27347Latitude: OrphanFundsFunding: NORestrictedUse: 09/14/2018StatusDate: ActiveStatus: NotreportedSpecialProgramStatus: 17Senate: 35Assembly: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmt. Req.: 102403SiteCode: Engineering & SpecialProjectsDivisionBranch: JosephTapiaSupervisor: SergioChavezProjectManager: DTSC - Site CleanupProgramLeadAgencyDescription: SMBRPCleanupOversightAgencies: NONationalPrioritiesList: 0.01Acres: State Response orNPLSiteTypeDetail: StateResponseSiteType: 60001343FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD AND HWY. 101Address: SAN LUIS OBISPO PCEPLUMEName: RESPONSE: 4985 ft. 0.944 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 104 ft. 1/2-1 CorteseSANLUISOBISPO, CA 93401 WSW ENVIROSTORLOSOSOSVALLEYROADANDHWY. 101 N/A 243 RESPONSESANLUISOBISPOPCEPLUME S110653093 TC6926581.2s Page 955 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: on 11/14/2012 and 11/15/2012. Active soil gas samples were collected and analyzed in a mobilelabComments: 11/15/2012CompletedDate: FieldworkCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: staff in correspondence dated 8/20/2012. active soil gas samples from areas of concern, was approved by DTSC The workplan addendum, which includes plans for the collectionofComments: 08/20/2012CompletedDate: Site CharacterizationWorkplanCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 08/16/2012CompletedDate: FieldworkCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: August, 2011. DTSC letter dated September 20, 2011 approves URS workplandatedComments: 09/20/2011CompletedDate: TechnicalWorkplanCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 06/11/2015CompletedDate: TriageMeetingCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: numerous property owners. Signed access agreement forms conveyed by DTSC were returnedbyComments: 06/12/2014CompletedDate: AccessAgreementCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Start work order was sent on 6/3/2014.Comments: 06/03/2014CompletedDate: State/Federal Funded Site WorkOrderCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60001343AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102403AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102402AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102401AliasName: SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE PLUME (Continued) S110653093 TC6926581.2s Page 956 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 102403SiteCode: 09/14/2018StatusDate: ActiveStatus: 60001343FacilityID: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD AND HWY. 101Address: SAN LUIS OBISPO PCEPLUMEName: ENVIROSTOR: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: 04/05/2022ScheduleDueDate: ConsentOrderScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDEScheduleAreaName: 2022FutureDueDate: Site CharacterizationReportFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDEFutureAreaName: Agreement for access was signed by DTSC representative on 4/6/2011.Comments: 04/06/2011CompletedDate: AccessAgreementCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: activities conducted in late 2014. The URS report dated March 11, 2015 summarizes assessmentrelatedComments: 05/08/2015CompletedDate: Site CharacterizationReportCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Soil gas samples collected in September 2014.Comments: 09/16/2014CompletedDate: FieldworkCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: correspondence dated 8/18/2014. Workplan for collection of soil gas samples was approved inDTSCComments: 09/03/2014CompletedDate: TechnicalWorkplanCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 07/03/2013CompletedDate: TechnicalReportCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: 2010. Gore Modules was conveyed in DTSC correspondence dated October 21, A start work order that includes provisions for the installationofComments: 10/21/2010CompletedDate: State/Federal Funded Site WorkOrderCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE PLUME (Continued) S110653093 TC6926581.2s Page 957 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TechnicalWorkplanCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 06/11/2015CompletedDate: TriageMeetingCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: numerous property owners. Signed access agreement forms conveyed by DTSC were returnedbyComments: 06/12/2014CompletedDate: AccessAgreementCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Start work order was sent on 6/3/2014.Comments: 06/03/2014CompletedDate: State/Federal Funded Site WorkOrderCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Completed Info: Envirostor IDNumberAliasType: 60001343AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102403AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102402AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102401AliasName: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 102043AliasName: PCodeAliasType: 102044AliasName: AQUI, SVPotentialDescription: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEConfirmedCOC: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotentialCOC: DRYCLEANINGPastUse: NONESPECIFIEDAPN: 120.6695Longitude: 35.27347Latitude: OrphanFundsFunding: NONESPECIFIEDSiteMgmtReq: NORestrictedUse: NotreportedSpecialProgram: 17Senate: 35Assembly: Engineering & SpecialProjectsDivisionBranch: JosephTapiaSupervisor: SergioChavezProgramManager: SMBRPLeadAgency: SMBRPRegulatoryAgencies: NONPL: 0.01Acres: State Response orNPLSiteTypeDetailed: StateResponseSiteType: SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE PLUME (Continued)S110653093 TC6926581.2s Page 958 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation The URS report dated March 11, 2015 summarizes assessmentrelatedComments: 05/08/2015CompletedDate: Site CharacterizationReportCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: Soil gas samples collected in September 2014.Comments: 09/16/2014CompletedDate: FieldworkCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: correspondence dated 8/18/2014. Workplan for collection of soil gas samples was approved inDTSCComments: 09/03/2014CompletedDate: TechnicalWorkplanCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 07/03/2013CompletedDate: TechnicalReportCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: 2010. Gore Modules was conveyed in DTSC correspondence dated October 21, A start work order that includes provisions for the installationofComments: 10/21/2010CompletedDate: State/Federal Funded Site WorkOrderCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: on 11/14/2012 and 11/15/2012. Active soil gas samples were collected and analyzed in a mobilelabComments: 11/15/2012CompletedDate: FieldworkCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: staff in correspondence dated 8/20/2012. active soil gas samples from areas of concern, was approved by DTSC The workplan addendum, which includes plans for the collectionofComments: 08/20/2012CompletedDate: Site CharacterizationWorkplanCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: NotreportedComments: 08/16/2012CompletedDate: FieldworkCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: August, 2011. DTSC letter dated September 20, 2011 approves URS workplandatedComments: 09/20/2011CompletedDate: SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE PLUME (Continued) S110653093 TC6926581.2s Page 959 MAPFINDINGSMapID Direction EDR IDNumberDistance EPA IDNumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Haz Waste & SubstancesSitesFileName: NotreportedWasteManagementUitName: NotreportedSolidWasteIdNo: NotreportedWIDId: NotreportedRegion2: NotreportedEffectiveDate: NotreportedWasteDischargeSystemNo: NotreportedOrderNo: envirostorFlag: NotreportedSwatR: NotreportedEnfType: NotreportedOwner: 120.66957Longitude: 35.273473Latitude: 102043, 102401, 102402, 102403, 108007SiteCode: 09/14/2018StatusDate: ACTIVECleanupStatus: STATERESPONSESite/Facility Type: NotreportedGlobalID: 60001343EnvirostorId: CORTESERegion: SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA93401City,State,Zip: LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD AND HWY. 101Address: SAN LUIS OBISPO PCEPLUMEName: CORTESE: NotreportedScheduleRevisedDate: 04/05/2022ScheduleDueDate: ConsentOrderScheduleDocumentType: NotreportedScheduleSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDEScheduleAreaName: 2022FutureDueDate: Site CharacterizationReportFutureDocumentType: NotreportedFutureSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDEFutureAreaName: Agreement for access was signed by DTSC representative on 4/6/2011.Comments: 04/06/2011CompletedDate: AccessAgreementCompletedDocumentType: NotreportedCompletedSubAreaName: PROJECTWIDECompletedAreaName: activities conducted in late 2014. SAN LUIS OBISPO PCE PLUME (Continued) S110653093 TC6926581.2s Page 960 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC6926581.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC6926581.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6926581.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 11/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks TC6926581.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC6926581.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6926581.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 12/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 0 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC6926581.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. TC6926581.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies AQUEOUS FOAM: Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Airports shown on this list are those believed to use Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), and certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139 (14 CFR Part 139). This list was created by SWRCB using information available from the FAA. Location points shown are from the latitude and longitude listed on the FAA airport master record. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5455 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6926581.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 02/24/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing TC6926581.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6926581.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022 Number of Days to Update: 239 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Number of Days to Update: 574 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC6926581.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC6926581.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6926581.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 01/20/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6926581.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 251 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 96 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC6926581.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. TC6926581.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration. Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi Telephone: 202-693-9424 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. TC6926581.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 95 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 12/16/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 05/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. TC6926581.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 11/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2022 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 10/05/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6926581.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. TC6926581.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5810 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites TC6926581.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging. Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 120 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PCS: Permit Compliance System PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA, Office of Water Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System Mineral Resources Data System Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-6533 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-324-2444 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS ENF: Enforcement data No description is available for this data TC6926581.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2497 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives TC6926581.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 11/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 12/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 10/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 10/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 08/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Kern County Public Health Telephone: 661-321-3000 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 01/10/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 01/10/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-6973 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical sites, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6926581.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MENDOCINO COUNTY: UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 09/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. TC6926581.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6926581.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 06/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 08/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 02/03/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. TC6926581.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SANTA CLARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 01/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 04/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 12/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: TC6926581.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC6926581.2s Page GR-51 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: Endeavor Business Media Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Endeavor Business Media This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 TC6926581.2s Page GR-52 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION Â© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC6926581.2s Page GR-53 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC6926581.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2018VersionDate: 12016401 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CANorthMap: 2018VersionDate: 12017291 PISMO BEACH, CATargetPropertyMap: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 127 ft. above sealevelElevation: 3902926.5UTMY (Meters): 712880.4UTMX (Meters): Zone10UniversalTranverseMercator: 120.66028 - 120ˆ39’ 37.01’’Longitude (West): 35.248627 - 35ˆ14’ 55.06’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD 276, 325, 438, 471 TANK FARM ROAD TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC6926581.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation ( ft) Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles Target Property Elevation: 127ft. NorthSouthWest East115126127129128126129126124127131138138144161188246400405106112124128132136134126124127125142146163174166171171176General SWGeneral Topographic Gradient:TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION GEOCHECK - TC6926581.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERALDIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATERFLOWFROMTPMAPID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not foundStatus: 1.25 milesSearchRadius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: 1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and DetailMapPISMOBEACH NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic DataCoverageNWIQuadatTargetProperty FEMA FIRM Flooddata06079C1332G FEMA FIRM Flooddata06079C1069G FEMA FIRM Flooddata06079C1068G Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flooddata06079C1331G Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6926581.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Plutonic and IntrusiveRocksCategory:CenozoicEra: TertiarySystem: Tertiary intrusiverocksSeries: TiCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 32 2 2 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC6926581.2s Page A-6 107inchesDepthtoWatertableMin: 0inchesDepthtoBedrockMin: HighCorrosionPotential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Somewhat poorlydrainedSoilDrainageClass: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have ahighHydrologicGroup: sandy clayloamSoilSurfaceTexture: MarimelSoilComponentName: Soil Map ID: 2 Max: Min: Min: Max: NotreportedNotreported bedrock weathered64inches59inches2 Max: Min: Min: Max: NotreportedNotreportedvariable59inches0inches1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction pH) 0inchesDepthtoWatertableMin: 0inchesDepthtoBedrockMin: NotReportedCorrosionPotential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric WelldrainedSoilDrainageClass: NotreportedHydrologicGroup: variableSoilSurfaceTexture: XerertsSoilComponentName: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6926581.2s Page A-7 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 more), Fat Clay. limit 50% or Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayclay35inches0inches1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction pH) 0inchesDepthtoWatertableMin: 0inchesDepthtoBedrockMin: HighCorrosionPotential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Moderately welldrainedSoilDrainageClass: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have ahighHydrologicGroup: claySoilSurfaceTexture: CropleySoilComponentName: Soil Map ID: 3 Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 1.4 Max: 4 50%), Lean Clay limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay silty clay loam to clay loam to stratifiedloam59inches16inches2 Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 1.4 Max: 4 50%), Lean Clay limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandyclayloam16inches0inches1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6926581.2s Page A-8 1/4 - 1/2 MileSWCADDW0000012262A1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROMTPWELLIDMAPID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROMTPWELLIDMAPID No Wells Found FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROMTPWELLIDMAPID 1.000StateDatabase Nearest PWS within 1mileFederalFRDSPWS 1.000FederalUSGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 more), Fat Clay. limit 50% or Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysiltyclayloam59inches35inches2 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6926581.2s Page A-9 1/2 - 1 MileSWCAPFAS000000321O53 1/2 - 1 MileSouthCAEDF000001610152 1/2 - 1 MileSouthCAEDF0000014448N51 1/2 - 1 MileSouthCAEDF0000025263N50 1/2 - 1 MileEastCADWR000001905749 1/2 - 1 MileEastCADWR0000012885M48 1/2 - 1 MileESECAPFAS000001561M47 1/2 - 1 MileESECADDW0000008520M46 1/2 - 1 MileSECADDW0000001516L45 1/2 - 1 MileSECAPFAS000000192L44 1/2 - 1 MileNNWCADPR000000097143 1/2 - 1 MileSECADDW0000017613I42 1/2 - 1 MileWSWCAPFAS000000920K41 1/2 - 1 MileWSWCADDW0000022317K40 1/2 - 1 MileSECAPFAS000000442I39 1/2 - 1 MileSECADDW0000017770I38 1/2 - 1 MileEastCADDW0000009663J37 1/2 - 1 MileEast17807J36 1/2 - 1 MileSECAPFAS000000866I35 1/2 - 1 MileSECADDW0000009459I34 1/2 - 1 MileEastCADDW0000004391J33 1/2 - 1 MileSECADDW0000003501I32 1/2 - 1 MileWestCADPR000000192131 1/2 - 1 MileNWCAEDF0000072210H30 1/2 - 1 MileNWCAEDF0000130438H29 1/2 - 1 MileNWCAEDF0000005059H28 1/2 - 1 MileSWCAEDF000001875227 1/2 - 1 MileNWCAEDF0000109725H26 1/2 - 1 MileWNWCAEDF0000032623H25 1/2 - 1 MileNWCAEDF0000075782H24 1/2 - 1 MileEastCADDW000001998223 1/2 - 1 MileNWCAEDF0000034796H22 1/2 - 1 MileNWCAEDF0000123275H21 1/2 - 1 MileWSWCADDW000000295820 1/2 - 1 MileWestCADWR0000035433G19 1/2 - 1 MileWestCADPR0000004494G18 1/2 - 1 MileSouthCADDW0000004657F17 1/2 - 1 MileSouthCADDW0000008024F16 1/2 - 1 MileSWCAPFAS000000629E15 1/2 - 1 MileSWCADDW0000010618E14 1/2 - 1 MileSSWCAPFAS000000630D13 1/2 - 1 MileSSWCADDW0000007769D12 1/4 - 1/2 MileWSW11555C11 1/4 - 1/2 MileWestCAEDF000003017810 1/4 - 1/2 MileWSWCADDW00000162729 1/4 - 1/2 MileWSWCADDW0000014983C8 1/4 - 1/2 MileSWCAPFAS000000107B7 1/4 - 1/2 MileSWCADDW0000019727B6 1/4 - 1/2 MileSWCADDW0000012921B5 1/4 - 1/2 MileNNECADWR00000345764 1/4 - 1/2 MileWNWCAEDF00000141603 1/4 - 1/2 MileSWCAPFAS000000938A2 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROMTPWELLIDMAPID GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6926581.2s Page A-10 1/2 - 1 MileESE17808S66 1/2 - 1 MileESECAPFAS000001652S65 1/2 - 1 MileESECADDW0000018626S64 1/2 - 1 MileWSWCADWR0000000632Q63 1/2 - 1 MileENECADWR0000000567R62 1/2 - 1 MileENECADWR0000021070R61 1/2 - 1 MileEastCADDW000000640060 1/2 - 1 MileWSWCADPR0000000267Q59 1/2 - 1 MileWSWCAPFAS000001067P58 1/2 - 1 MileWSWCADDW0000013810P57 1/2 - 1 MileSSECADWR000001313056 1/2 - 1 MileESECADDW000001812255 1/2 - 1 MileSWCADDW0000011726O54 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROMTPWELLIDMAPID GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 520 320480 1 6 0 4404003600320 40 0 360 32036056052048044 0400400 5 2 0 360520 4 80440400400360360360 3203 203203 2 0 320320 280 2 8 0 280280 20002802801 2 0 120160 160160160 1 6 0240200200200 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 200200 2 4 0 2 4 0 24024 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 200200120120120 1201202000 0 20 0 2 0 0 20 2001600 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 16 0 160160 160 0 160601201 2 0 1 2 0 1 201 2 0 120 0 8080CA TC6926581.2s Page A-12 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E02P001M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E02P001MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E02P001MWellID: 4 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADWR0000034576CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: mp_date=&global_id=AGL020004316&assigned_name=IRRIGATION WELL&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=AGLAND&saGroundwaterQualityData: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: IRRIGATIONWELLOtherName: AgriculturalLandsSource: MONITORINGWellType: AGL020004316-IRRIGATIONWELLWellID: 3 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CAEDF0000014160CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000728-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000728-001WellID: A2 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CAPFAS000000938CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000728-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000728-001WellID: A1 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000012262CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-13 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000731-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000731-001WellID: C8 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000014983CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000730-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000730-001WellID: B7 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CAPFAS000000107CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000717-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000717-001WellID: B6 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000019727CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000730-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000730-001WellID: B5 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000012921CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-14 NotReportedAreaserve: 0Connection:0Popserv: NotReportedZipext:NotReportedZip: NotReportedState:NotReportedCity: NotReportedAddress:NotReportedHqname: Pacific Telephone Co.System nam:4000718Systemno: NotReportedComment7: NotReportedComment6:NotReportedComment5: NotReportedComment4:NotReportedComment3: 500 FEET NORTH OF SUBURBAN ROAD. 196 SUBURBAN ROAD25Comment2: SLO BACK CORNER OF LOT NEXT TO PRESSURE15Comment1: ARStatus:1Precision: 1204002.0Longitude:351444.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStationty:MAIN WELL01Sourcenam: GWatertype:4000718Systemno: 40CUserid:70District: 40County:4000718001Frdsno: 13S/12E-10H02MPrimstac:11555Seq: C11 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 11555CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: mp_date=&global_id=AGL020004316&assigned_name=HOUSE WELL&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=AGLAND&saGroundwaterQualityData: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: HOUSEWELLOtherName: AgriculturalLandsSource: MONITORINGWellType: AGL020004316-HOUSEWELLWellID: 10 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CAEDF0000030178CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000216-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000216-001WellID: 9 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000016272CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-15 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000752-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000752-001WellID: E15 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAPFAS000000629CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000752-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000752-001WellID: E14 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000010618CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000770-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000770-001WellID: D13 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAPFAS000000630CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000770-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000770-001WellID: D12 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000007769CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-16 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E10G002M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E10G002MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E10G002MWellID: G19 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000035433CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=87835&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 87835OtherName: Department of PesticideRegulationSource: UNKWellType: 87835WellID: G18 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADPR0000004494CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000718-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000718-001WellID: F17 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000004657CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000761-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000761-001WellID: F16 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000008024CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-17 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000632-003&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL 01-RVSTORAGEOtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000632-003WellID: 23 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000019982CAWELLS gned_name=MW-2 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-2&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-2OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-2WellID: H22 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000034796CAWELLS gned_name=MW-5 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-5&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-5OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-5WellID: H21 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000123275CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000751-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000751-001WellID: 20 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000002958CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-18 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: mp_date=&global_id=AGL020027578&assigned_name=TF WELL #1&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=AGLAND&saGroundwaterQualityData: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: TF WELL #1OtherName: AgriculturalLandsSource: MONITORINGWellType: AGL020027578-TF WELL #1WellID: 27 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000018752CAWELLS gned_name=MW-4 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-4&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-4OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-4WellID: H26 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000109725CAWELLS gned_name=MW-8 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-8&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-8OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-8WellID: H25 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000032623CAWELLS gned_name=MW-3 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-3&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-3OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-3WellID: H24 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000075782CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-19 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=87836&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 87836OtherName: Department of PesticideRegulationSource: UNKWellType: 87836WellID: 31 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADPR0000001921CAWELLS gned_name=MW-6 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-6&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-6OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-6WellID: H30 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000072210CAWELLS gned_name=MW-7 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-7&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-7OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-7WellID: H29 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000130438CAWELLS gned_name=MW-1 https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?cmd=MWEDFResults&global_id=T0607909561&assiGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=T0607909561&assigned_name=MW-1&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=EDF&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: MW-1OtherName: EDFSource: MONITORINGWellType: T0607909561-MW-1WellID: H28 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000005059CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-20 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000766-011&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL02OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000766-011WellID: I35 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAPFAS000000866CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000766-011&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL02OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000766-011WellID: I34 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000009459CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000632-002&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL02OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000632-002WellID: J33 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000004391CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000766-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000766-001WellID: I32 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000003501CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-21 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000768-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000768-001WellID: I38 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000017770CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000632-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL 02 - IRRIGATIONOtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000632-001WellID: J37 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000009663CAWELLS NotReportedAreaserve: 0Connection:0Popserv: NotReportedZipext:NotReportedZip: NotReportedState:NotReportedCity: NotReportedAddress:NotReportedHqname: Hidden HillsMhpSystemnam:4000632Systemno: NotReportedComment7: NotReportedComment6:NotReportedComment5: NotReportedComment4:A FENCED STORAGE AREA FOR RV’S.Comment 3: FARM. SAMPLING WELL IS IN THE TRAILER PARK LOCATEDINComment2: WESTERLY ON TANK FARM ROAD .25 MILE FROM HWY 227 & TANKComment1: ARStatus:3Precision: 1203842.0Longitude:351455.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStationty:WELL02Sourcenam: GWatertype:4000632Systemno: 40CUserid:70District: 40County:4000632001Frdsno: 31S/12E-12D02MPrimstac:17807Seq: J36 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 17807CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-22 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000765-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000765-001WellID: I42 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000017613CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000725-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000725-001WellID: K41 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAPFAS000000920CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000725-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000725-001WellID: K40 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000022317CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000768-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000768-001WellID: I39 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAPFAS000000442CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-23 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000726-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL 01, STANDBYOtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000726-001WellID: M46 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000008520CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000753-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000753-001WellID: L45 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000001516CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000753-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000753-001WellID: L44 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAPFAS000000192CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=87828&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 87828OtherName: Department of PesticideRegulationSource: UNKWellType: 87828WellID: 43 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADPR0000000971CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-24 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: mp_date=&global_id=AGL020011162&assigned_name=BUCKLEYD/I&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=AGLAND&saGroundwaterQualityData: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: BUCKLEYD/IOtherName: AgriculturalLandsSource: MONITORINGWellType: AGL020011162-BUCKLEYD/IWellID: N50 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000025263CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E12D099M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E12D099MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E12D099MWellID: 49 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000019057CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E12E003M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E12E003MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E12E003MWellID: M48 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000012885CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000726-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL 01, STANDBYOtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000726-001WellID: M47 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAPFAS000001561CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-25 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000806-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL02OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000806-001WellID: O54 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000011726CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000806-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL02OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000806-001WellID: O53 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAPFAS000000321CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: mp_date=&global_id=AGL020028292&assigned_name=WELL #2&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=AGLAND&saGroundwaterQualityData: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL #2OtherName: AgriculturalLandsSource: MONITORINGWellType: AGL020028292-WELL #2WellID: 52 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAEDF0000016101CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: mp_date=&global_id=AGL020028292&assigned_name=BE RANCH&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=AGLAND&saGroundwaterQualityData: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: BERANCHOtherName: AgriculturalLandsSource: MONITORINGWellType: AGL020028292-BERANCHWellID: N51 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAEDF0000014448CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-26 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000604-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000604-001WellID: P58 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAPFAS000001067CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000604-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL01OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000604-001WellID: P57 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000013810CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E14B001M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E14B001MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E14B001MWellID: 56 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000013130CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000722-002&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL 02 - STBYOtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000722-002WellID: 55 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000018122CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-27 NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E01N003M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E01N003MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E01N003MWellID: R62 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000000567CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E01N006M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E01N006MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E01N006MWellID: R61 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000021070CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000641-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL03OtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000641-001WellID: 60 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000006400CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=87834&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 87834OtherName: Department of PesticideRegulationSource: UNKWellType: 87834WellID: Q59 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADPR0000000267CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-28 NotReportedComment7: NotReportedComment6:NotReportedComment5: NotReportedComment4:NotReportedComment3: THE END. WELL IS 340’ WEST FROM THE END OFFIEROComment2: ON HWY 227 N OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AIRPORT. TAKE FIERO LANETOComment1: ARStatus:3Precision: 1203835.0Longitude:351435.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStationty:WELL01Sourcenam: GWatertype:4000722Systemno: 40CUserid:70District: 40County:4000722001Frdsno: 31S/12E-12F07MPrimstac:17808Seq: S66 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 17808CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000722-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: YesGAMAPFASTesting: WELL 01 - STBYOtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000722-001WellID: S65 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CAPFAS000001652CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=4000722-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: WELL 01 - STBYOtherName: Department of HealthServicesSource: MUNICIPALWellType: 4000722-001WellID: S64 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADDW0000018626CAWELLS NotReportedGeoTrackerData: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=31S12E10L001M&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: NotReportedGAMAPFASTesting: 31S12E10L001MOtherName: Department of WaterResourcesSource: UNKWellType: 31S12E10L001MWellID: Q63 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR0000000632CAWELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR IDNumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-29 0.1Dlr: MG/LReportunits:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.15Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: NotReportedReportunits:AGGRSSIVE INDEX (CORROSIVITY)Chemical: 13.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.1Dlr: NTUReportunits:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.35Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: NotReportedReportunits:LANGELIER INDEX @ 60CChemical: 1.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:TOTAL DISSOLVEDSOLIDSChemical: 1300.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 5.Dlr: UG/LReportunits:LEADChemical: 7.4Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: UG/LReportunits:ACETONEChemical: 11.Finding:10-JUN-15Sampledate: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReportunits:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 37.8Finding:11-JAN-16Sampledate: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReportunits:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 38.9Finding:21-APR-16Sampledate: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReportunits:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 39.3Finding:08-JUN-16Sampledate: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReportunits:GROSS ALPHA COUNTINGERRORChemical: 0.269Finding:08-JUN-16Sampledate: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReportunits:GROSS ALPHAMDA95Chemical: 2.11Finding:08-JUN-16Sampledate: 0.Dlr: USReportunits:SPECIFICCONDUCTANCEChemical: 3400.Finding:08-JUN-16Sampledate: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReportunits:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 29.3Finding:12-JUN-17Sampledate: NotReportedAreaserve: 0Connection:0Popserv: NotReportedZipext:NotReportedZip: NotReportedState:NotReportedCity: NotReportedAddress:NotReportedHqname: FieroLnSystemnam:4000722Systemno: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-30 0.Dlr: USReportunits:SPECIFICCONDUCTANCEChemical: 2900.Finding:13-JUN-13Sampledate: 100.Dlr: UG/LReportunits:BARIUMChemical: 310.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: USReportunits:SPECIFICCONDUCTANCEChemical: 2500.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: NotReportedReportunits:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) ASCACO3Chemical: 400.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:BICARBONATEALKALINITYChemical: 490.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:HARDNESS (TOTAL) ASCACO3Chemical: 1100.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:CALCIUMChemical: 160.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:MAGNESIUMChemical: 180.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:SODIUMChemical: 110.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.Dlr: MG/LReportunits:CHLORIDEChemical: 550.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReportunits:SULFATEChemical: 82.Finding:06-MAY-14Sampledate: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6926581.2s Page A-31 NotReportedNotReportedNotReportedNotReportedBasement NotReportedNotReportedNotReportedNotReportedLivingArea - 2nd Floor 25%0%75%6.925 pCi/LLivingArea - 1st Floor 20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverageActivityArea Number of sites tested: 4 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 93401 Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for SAN LUIS OBISPO County: 2 417993401 4 pCi/LNumTestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW InformationSystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC6926581.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5577 The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects. Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. California Earthquake Fault Lines Source: California Division of Mines and Geology The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-210-8558 Radon Database for California TC6926581.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION Â© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC6926581.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX B U.S. Geological Survey Historical Topographic Maps EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 April 05, 2022 6926581.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 2018 2015 2012 1995, 1998 1994 1979 1976, 1978 1965 1952 1948 1942 1916, 1918 1900 1897 04/05/22 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road Roux Associates Inc 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 555 12th Street Suite 250 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Oakland, CA 94607 6926581.4 Taylor Barrett EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Roux Associates Inc were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. NA 35.248627 35° 14' 55" North SLO Tank Farm -120.66028 -120° 39' 37" West Zone 10 North 712875.43 3903124.70 127.00' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6926581 4 2 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 2018 Source Sheets 2018 Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, 24000 2018 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 2015 Source Sheets 2015 Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, 24000 2015 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Source Sheets 2012 Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 1995, 1998 Source Sheets 1995 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 1998 Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1998 6926581 4 3 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 1994 Source Sheets 1994 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1988 1994 Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1988 1979 Source Sheets 1979 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1976 1976, 1978 Source Sheets 1976 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1976 1978 Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1976 1965 Source Sheets 1965 Pismo Beach 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 1965 San Luis Obispo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 6926581 4 4 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 1952 Source Sheets 1952 Arroyo Grande 15-minute, 62500 1952 San Luis Obispo 15-minute, 62500 1948 Source Sheets 1948 SAN LUIS OBISPO 15-minute, 50000 1942 Source Sheets 1942 Arroyo Grande 15-minute, 62500 1942 San Luis Obispo 15-minute, 62500 1916, 1918 Source Sheets 1916 SAN LUIS OBISPO 15-minute, 62500 1918 ARROYO GRANDE 15-minute, 62500 6926581 4 5 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 1900 Source Sheets 1900 San Luis 30-minute, 125000 1897 Source Sheets 1897 Arroyo Grande 15-minute, 62500 1897 San Luis Obispo 15-minute, 62500 6926581 4 6 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 2018 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Pismo Beach, 2018, 7.5-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 2018, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 7 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 2015 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Pismo Beach, 2015, 7.5-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 2015, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 8 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Pismo Beach, 2012, 7.5-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 2012, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 9 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1995, 1998 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Pismo Beach, 1998, 7.5-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 1995, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 10 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1994 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Pismo Beach, 1994, 7.5-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 1994, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 11 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1979 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc N, San Luis Obispo, 1979, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 12 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1976, 1978 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Pismo Beach, 1978, 7.5-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 1976, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 13 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1965 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Pismo Beach, 1965, 7.5-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 1965, 7.5-minute 6926581 4 14 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1952 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Arroyo Grande, 1952, 15-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 1952, 15-minute 6926581 4 15 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1948 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc N, SAN LUIS OBISPO, 1948, 15-minute 6926581 4 16 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1942 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Arroyo Grande, 1942, 15-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 1942, 15-minute 6926581 4 17 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1916, 1918 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, ARROYO GRANDE, 1918, 15-minute N, SAN LUIS OBISPO, 1916, 15-minute 6926581 4 18 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1900 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, San Luis, 1900, 30-minute 6926581 4 19 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). EW SW S SE NW N NE 1897 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Roux Associates Inc TP, Arroyo Grande, 1897, 15-minute N, San Luis Obispo, 1897, 15-minute 6926581 4 20 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX C Historical Aerial Photographs The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Inquiry Number: April 05, 2022 6926581.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 2016 1"=750'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=750'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=750'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=750'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 1994 1"=750'Acquisition Date: September 03, 1994 USGS/DOQQ 1981 1"=750'Flight Date: August 01, 1981 USDA 1976 1"=750'Flight Date: June 28, 1976 USGS 1963 1"=750'Flight Date: July 02, 1963 USGS 1960 1"=750'Flight Date: April 02, 1960 USGS 1956 1"=750'Flight Date: September 10, 1956 USDA 1949 1"=750'Flight Date: April 03, 1949 USDA 1939 1"=750'Flight Date: January 01, 1939 USDA EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 04/05/22 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road Site Name:Client Name: Roux Associates Inc 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 555 12th Street Suite 250 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Oakland, CA 94607 EDR Inquiry #6926581.8 Contact:Taylor Barrett Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 6926581 8-page 2 6926581.8 2016 750' 6926581.8 2012 750' 6926581.8 2009 750' 6926581.8 2006 750' 6926581.8 1994 750' 6926581.8 1981 750' 6926581.8 1976 750' 6926581.8 1963 750' 6926581.8 1960 750' 6926581.8 1956 750' 6926581.8 1949 750' 6926581.8 1939 750' Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX D City Directory Abstract 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Inquiry Number: 6926581.5 April 06, 2022 Th e EDR-City Directo ry Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmentalDataResourcesIncEnvironmentalDataResourcesIncEnvironmentalDataResourcesIncEnvironmentalDataResourcesInc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTI VE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION E nv ironmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RECORD SOURCES ED R's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2017 EDR Digital Archive 2014 EDR Digital Archive 2010 EDR Digital Archive 2005 EDR Digital Archive 2000 EDR Digital Archive 1995 EDR Digital Archive 1992 EDR Digital Archive 1985 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1981 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 POLK DIRECTORY CO 1972 POLK DIRECTORY CO 1967 POLK DIRECTORY CO 1962 POLK DIRECTORY CO 6926581-5 Page 1 6926581-5 Page 2 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Year CD Image Source TANK FARM RD 2017 p g A2 EDR Digital Archive 2014 pg A5 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg A9 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg A12 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg A15 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg A17 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg A19 EDR Digital Archive 1985 pg A21 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 pg A22 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1981 pg A23 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 pg A24 POLK DIRECTORY CO 1972 pg 0 POLK DIRECTORY CO Street not listed in Source 1967 pg 0 POLK DIRECTORY CO Street not listed in Source 1962 pg 0 POLK DIRECTORY CO Street not listed in Source 6926581-5 Page 3 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS No Cross Streets Identified 6926581-5 Page 4 City Directory Images TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A2 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2017 175 DOGGIE SALON & SPA 181 KOHANA PHARMACY MATT CLARK TILE & STONE MICHAEL BAUERSCHMIDT MD 187 DAVINICI LABORATORIES FIRMA CONSULTANTS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY KELLYMOORE PAINTS PEDIATRIC THERAPY SOLUTIONS THERAPIES TO GROW ON VENTANA FINE WINDOWS & DOORS XONTEC 188 CHIROCARE INJURY & WELLNESS MEDICAL GROUP JON P WELLS DC KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS 202 CAREFREE POOLS & SPAS CASTLEROCK DEVELOPMENT GERMAN PARTS & RESTORATION GREYHOUND BUS LINES K ITCHEN & BATH WORKS KRAMER EVENTS NORTH SLO COUNTY PETDOORSCOM RENTAL DEPOT SAN LUIS OBISPO TAXI TRI COUNTIES TRANSIT WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICE CENTER 205 AIRGAS 211 AFX RESEARCH GOT YOU COVERD 219 CONWAY WESTERN EXPRESS RUSH TRUCK CENTER SM TIRE UNION ASPHALT 224 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY 225 B & B DOORS & TRIMS EXCEL CLEANING INC HERBERT BROTHERS ZUBES IMPORT AUTO SALES 235 APPLIANCE CENTRAL CANDY CANE LANE CHRISTMAS TREE CO REEVES AUTO REPAIR 245 BOB HOLZER TOWING CENTRAL COAST FLOORING FRANKLIN REALTY RED ALERT PLUMBING SAN LUIS AUTO GLASS SAN LUIS TINT SLO AUTO GLASS & TINT Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A3 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2017 249 MATTRESS LAND SLEEPFIT 251 PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 255 DYERS DIESELRO 257 SMARDANHATCHER CO 259 OROWEAT 265 COASTAL JANITORIAL LLC 267 SLO BAKED 269 JEFFERIS AUTOBODY 271 DYERS DIESELRO 273 COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE DE SOTO SALES 275 CENTRAL COAST MOTOR SPORTS J & M PRODUCTS 276 CHEVRON 277 DANGELOS AUTOMOTIVE PAINT 281 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE 625 MATRIX MOBILE TELEVISION SAN LUIS PAPER CO & JANITORIAL SUPPL 635 UNITED RENTALS 645 ALAMO SELF STORAGE GAINES BILL AUDIO LEYZNE SLO SAIL & CANVAS SPECTRUM COLOR IMAGES STRATTON, DANIELLE THREAD HEAD EMBROIDERY TILE CO 650 BOHANNON, ROY CIELATKA, SANDRA D CORDERO, THOMAS DEGUZMAN, SHERLYN DIANE, BAYARD ENGELBERT, ELIZABETH M GLADDEN, ARYEL GUERRERO, DAMARIS GUTIERREZ, ELIZABETH HERNANDEZ, KENNIA LOPEZ, JOSE A MACIAS, ELVIA RAMIREZ, IMELDA ROWAN, GREG F SILVA, EARLENE M TILTON, BROCK TORRES, JOSE VAUGHN, B VOGET, DAVID 651 MIND BODY 689 CHARLES STURGEON MD COLDWELL BANKER CU NGUYEN MD Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A4 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2017 689 DAVID JAVITZ MD DIGNITY HEALTH DIGNITY HEALTH PACIFIC CENTRAL COAST ELLIOT KLAW MD FRANK M BASICH MD GLENN F OELKER MD JONATHAN B MCALPIN ARCHITECT JOSEPH R HORNE OD JOYCE KELLAWON MD LARRY B BALDWIN MD MARK STILPHEN MD MURPHY HOME LOANS INC MURPHY, MIKI OMNI DESIGN GROUP INC PACIFIC COAST PHYSICIANS RENA STATHACOPOULOS MD ROBERT BRENMAN MD SAN LUIS OBISPO EYE ASSOCIATES TERRY L KAIURA MD THOMAS G REAYS ARCHITECT W JAMES GEALY JR MD 711 BARNETT COX & ASSOCIATES CENTRAL COAST MORTGAGE CONSULTANTS OMNI DESIGN GROUP PACIFIC OAK FORECLOSURE SERVICE RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 715 CENTRAL COAST MORTGAGE CONSULTANTS ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY MEDICAL ASSOCIAT 734 WHEELER & BEATON 735 ADELSON TESTAN BRUNDO NOVELL & JI CENTEX HOMES COASTAL FUNDING SLC COMMERCE TITLE COMPANY COMPUTER & SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INC CTX MORTGAGE ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP EMPLOYER ADVOCATES GROUP HPD SOFTWARE LLC MANGANO HOMES MORTGAGE ONE NEGOM RICUCCIO DDS PROFESSIONAL CORP POV MANAGEMENT LLC RICHARDSON PROPERTIES SAN LUIS CAPITAL TESTAN & BRUNDO ADELSON WHEELER & BEATON TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A5 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2014 175 DOGGIE SALON & SPA 181 KOHANA PHARMACY LTCSLO MATT CLARK TILE & STONE SLO CONSIGNMENT FURNITURE 187 C W QUINN FIRMA CONSULTANTS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY RESTORE KELLYMOORE PAINTS LTCSLO PEDIATRIC THERAPY SOLUTIONS THERAPIES TO GROW ON VENTANA FINE WINDOWS & DOORS XONTEC 188 CHIROCARE KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS TRILLIUM DAY SPA WELLS JON P DC 202 BEACH CITIES CAB CO CAREFREE POOLS & SPAS CASTLEROCK DEVELOPMENT GERMAN PARTS & RESTORATION GREYHOUND BUS LINES INTEGRITY SYSTEMS KITCHEN & BATH WORKS KRAMER EVENTS INC NORTH SLO COUNTY PATIO PACIFIC INC RENTAL DEPOT SAN LUIS OBISPO TAXI STERLING COMMUNICATIONS TRI COUNTIES TRANSIT WAGNERS IMPORT SERVICE CENTER 205 AIRGAS 211 AFX RESEARCH GOT YOU COVERD PELLIGRINELLI, DAVID 219 CALPORTLAND CONWAY FREIGHT RUSH TRUCK CENTER SM TIRE INC UNION ASPHALT 224 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY 225 EXCEL CLEANING COMPANY HERBERT BROTHERS SCHMIDT, GARY W TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE ZUBES IMPORT AUTO SALES 235 APPLIANCE CENTRAL REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A6 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2014 245 CENTRAL COAST FLOORING FRANKLIN REALTY FRIEDLANDER, MICHAEL S HOLDGRAFER GROUP INC RED ALERT PLUMBING SAN LUIS AUTO GLASS SLO AUTO GLASS & TINT 251 PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 257 SMARDAN HATCHER SAN LUIS SMARDANHATCHER CO 259 OROWEAT 267 SLO BAKED 269 JEFFERIS AUTOBODY JEFFERIS HOT ROD AUTOBODY GLASS 271 DYERS DIESELRO 273 DE SOTO SALES 275 CENTRAL COAST MOTOR SPORTS J & M PRODUCTS MCBRIDES PLUMBING & SHEET METAL INC 276 CHEVRON 277 A DANGELO & SONS 281 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE 625 MATRIX MOBILE TELEVISION SAN LUIS PAPER COMPANY INC 635 UNITED RENTALS 645 ALAMO SELF STORAGE FARIA, B GAINES BILL AUDIO LEYZNE SLO SAIL & CANVAS SPECTRUM COLOR IMAGES THREAD HEAD EMBROIDERY TILE CO 650 ARTEAGA, MICAELA I BOHANNON, DANIELLE CIELATKA, SANDRA D CUSSATO, VANTE ELLIS, JILLIAN ENGELBERT, ELIZABETH M FLOYD, JERRY L GLADDEN, ARYEL GUERRERO, DAMARIS GUTIERREZ, ELIZABETH GUZMAN, ELIZABETH HIDDEN HILLS MOBILODGE LANE, PAULINE E LEPAGE, KATHY J LOPEZ, JOSE A MACIAS, ABEL MACKENZIE, FLANAGAN F Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A7 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2014 650 MILBURN, MERILYN J MILTON, FRANKIE MURPHY, SHAWN K ROWAN, GREG F SILVA, EARLENE M TURNER, KARI L VOGET, DAVID WEAVER, THOMAS C WEST, AARON B 651 JW DESIGN BUILD 689 BRENMAN ROBERT MD COLDWELL BANKER HARRIS PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS INC JAVITZ DAVID MD KLAW ELLIOT MD MURPHY HOME LOANS INC NGUYEN CU MD PACIFIC COAST PHYSICIANS SAN LUIS OBISPO EYE ASSOCIATES STURGEON CHARLES MD VERDIN MARKETING INK 711 BARNETT COX & ASSOCIATES OMNI DESIGN GROUP RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 715 ALLEN KAREN D CENTRAL COAST MORTGAGE CONSULTANTS CUESTA TITLE COMPANY ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY MEDICAL ASSOCIAT 735 ADELSON TESTAN BRUNDO & JIMENEZ ADELSON TESTAN BRUNDO CASE CENTEX HOMES COASTAL FUNDING SLC COMMERCE TITLE COMPANY COMPUTER & SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INC CTX MORTGAGE ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP EMPLOYER ADVOCATES GROUP MANGANO HOMES MEDALLION MORTGAGE COMPANY MORTGAGE ONE NEGOM RICUCCIO DDS PROFESSIONAL CORP POV MANAGEMENT LLC RICHARDSON PROPERTIES RICOH RJ MCCONNELL INSURANCE SAN LUIS CAPITAL TESTAN & BRUNDO ADELSON WHEELER & BEATON A PROFESSIONAL LAW Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A8 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2014 735 WHEELER & BEATON LAW CORPORATION TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A9 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2010 181 CHARTER MEDIA MATT CLARK TILE & STONE 187 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY KELLEYMOORE PAINT CO PEDIATRIC THERAPY SOLUTIONS SILVER FAMILY PRACTICE THERAPIES TO GROW ON 188 INJURY & WELLNESWS CTR KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS SCIENTIFIC CHIROPRACTIC SLO AGING INST 202 ALLTECH SERVICES INC BEACH CITIES CAB CO BITS & PIECES CASTLEROCK DEVELOPMENT CENTRAL COAST SPORTS CARDS DOUBLE D FEED & SUPPLY GARDEN ESCAPES INTEGRITY SECURITY MANDUKA SHETLER CONSTRUCTION INC TANK FARM BUSINESS PARK W G CHASE LLC 205 AIRGAS WEST SAN LUIS SURGICAL SUPPLY 211 VAS ENTERTAINMENT VIDEO ACTION SPORTS INC 219 CALPORTLAND CONWAY FREIGHT RUSH TRUCK CTR UNION ASPHALT 224 FARM SUPPLY CO 225 ALL AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION HERBERT BROTHERS FURNITURE TOWN & COUNTRY FENCING 235 APPLIANCE CENTRAL CANDY CANE LANE CHRISTMAS TREE 245 BRIGHAM JORY CAPEL CONCEPTS FRANKLIN REALTY GRIZZLE CONSTRUCTION RED ALERT PLUMBING & FIRE 249 MATTRESS & BED SUPERSTORE 251 PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 257 SMARDANHATCHER SAN LUIS 259 OROWEAT BAKING CO 261 IMPERIAL WELDING 267 ITS A PEACE OF CAKE SLO BAKED BAKERIES 269 JEFFERIS AUTOBODY Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A10 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2010 271 DYERS DIESELRO INC 273 DE SOTO SALES 275 MC BRIDES PLUMBINGSHEET MTL 277 DANGELOS AUTOMOTIVE PAINT DANGELOS INDUSTRIAL COATING 281 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE 305 GODFREY, CHRIS 600 ARTISAN TILE & MARBLE 625 MATRIX MOBILE TELEVISION SAN LUIS PAPER CO 635 UNITED RENTALS 645 ALAMO SELF STORAGE BILL GAINES AUDIO IRON CROSS AUTO BODY SLO SAIL & CANVAS SPECTRUM COLOR IMAGES THREAD HEAD EMBROIDERY TILECO DISTRIBUTORS INC 650 ACEVES, MIGUEL COLLINS, JASON D DININGER, JOSHUA S ELLIS, JILLIAN ENGELBERT, ELIZABETH FLOYD, JERRY L GIORDANO, DAY A GRANT, CHELSEA GUERRERO, DAMARIS HIDDEN HILLS MOBILODGE LANE, PAULINE E LASTER, POPPY D LAZEY ACRES RECREATIONAL STGE LEPAGE, KATHY LUNDY, ERIC B MACIAS, JUAN MACKENZIE, FLANAGAN F MADERO, CARMEN MARQUEZ, SARA REYNA, J ROBER, CRYSTAL SILVA, EARLENE M TILTON, CARMELITE M WALTZ, ROBERT E 651 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM 660 SILVER OAK CONSTRUCTION 666 CURRY, PETER C 675 QUINN RENTAL SVC 689 COLDWELL BANKER MURPHY HOME LOANS INC OMNI DESIGN GROUP OMNI DESIGN GROUP INC Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A11 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2010 689 PACIFIC COAST PHYSICIANS PACIFIC COAST PHYSICIANS MED SAN LUIS OBISPO EYE ASSOC VERDIN MARKETING INK 711 BARNETT COX & ASSOC CENTRAL COAST BUS PASSPORT HOME PROS PACIFIC OAK FORECLOSURE SVC PASSPORT MEDIA ENTERPRISES RICK ENGINEERING CO SLO COUNTY PASSPORT WACHOVIA SECURITIES WELLS FARGO ADVISORS WELLS FARGO PRIVATE CLIENT SVC WILSON & CO SOTHEBYS INTL 715 CUESTA TITLE KISSINGER, GAIL 735 ARBOR HOME MORTGAGE INC BEATON, GIFFORD G BIOKINETIC ENGINEERING BUSCHUR REALTY CENTEX HOMES COASTAL FUNDING SLC COMMERCE TITLE CO COMPUTER & SOFTWARE ENTS INC CTX MORTGAGE CO DAVIDSON FILMS INC DAVIDSON, F GRAY & PROUTY HUBBS & ASSOC CONSULTING GROUP HUBBS SCHOOL OF GOLF NEGOM RICUCCIO A DDS RICHARDSON PROPERTIES SAN LUIS CAPITAL STATE FARM INSURANCE VALLEY YELLOW PAGES VANIR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 785 MEYER, DAVE S TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A12 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2005 202 ALLTECH SERVICES BITS & PIECES CALIFORNIA CAB CO CASTLEROCK DEVELOPMENT CENTRAL COAST SPORTS CARDS D9L TECHNOLOGIES DOUBLE D FEED & SUPPLY FERRELLS AUTO REPAIR GANG NAIL TRUSS CO GERMAN PARTS & RESTORATION PLASTANK INC SHETLER CONSTRUCTION INC CA TANK FARM BUSINESS PARK ZACCA CREEK 205 A & R WELDING SUPPLY CO 211 V AS ENTERTAINMENT 212 FOSTER, JACK S 219 CON WAY WESTERN EXPRESS SAN LUIS TRUCK SERVICE GARAGE INC 224 FARM SUPPLY CO 225 GOLDEN VALLEY MORTGAGE HERBERT BROTHERS TOWN & COUNTRY FENCING UNILEVER BESTFOODS FOODSERVICE 235 APPLIANCE CENTRAL RHINO LININGS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 245 FLUID SOLUTIONS CO FRANKLIN REALTY G W DAVIDSON INC GRIZZLE CONSTRUCTION HILL 4 WHEEL DRIVE UTENSILS OF MEXICO 251 PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 255 WHITES DRYWALL 257 SMARDAN HATCHER SAN LUIS 259 WEBER MILLBROOK BREAD 261 IMPERIAL MUFFLER & WELDING IMPERIAL WELDING 267 SLO BAKED 269 JEFFERIS AUTOBODY 271 DIESELRO INC 273 DESOTO SALES JACKS SNACKS OF SLO VICTOR KEMP CO 275 MCBRIDES PLUMBING & SHEET METAL INC 277 DANGELOS AUTOMOTIVE AND INDUSTRIAL DANGELOS INDUSTRIAL COATINGS 279 COVER ALL INC 281 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE 305 JONES, TREVOR Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A13 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2005 615 MATRIX MOBILE TELEVISION 625 SAN LUIS PAPER CO & JANITORIAL SUPPL 635 UNITED RENTALS 645 BAYWOOD TILE CO CENTRAL COAST MECHANICS DODD, STANLEY J HOADLEYS AUTOBODY PADRE OPTICAL ROSARIO, RAY SLO STORAGE TILECO DISTRIBUTORS INC TRUVATIV TTIREM INC 650 ADAMS, RICHARD G ATKINSON, TOM W BARNES, MERIAH CLEMENTS, CASSANDRA CORDOVA, ROBERTO ENGELBERT, ELIZABETH ENRIQUEZ, SUSANA FLOYD, JERRY L GRANTHAM, SHIRLEY J HERNANDEZ, JOSE M HIDDEN HILLS MOBILODGE LANE, PAULINE E LAZEY ACRES RECREATIONAL STORAGE LEPAGE, KATHY LUNDY, ERIC B MACIAS, ELVIA MACKENZIE, FLANAGAN P MADRED, MARCELA MATA, OSCAR MILBURN, MERILYN E NIEBLAS, LAURA E PONCE, WILLY PULVER, TRAVIS S REMILLARD, CYNTHIA SIMON, ROD J SPEZIO, GERALD A TURNER, BARBARA L WALTZ, ROBERT E 651 AGRICULTURE EDUCATN COMMITTEE FARM BUREAU 660 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 666 CURRY, PETER C 675 SLO COUNTY FARM SUPPLY INC 715 LEE & ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE LEE & ASSOCS REAL ESTATE 735 CENTEX HOMES CHICAGO TITLE CO Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A14 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2005 735 COMPUTER & SOFTWARE ENTERPRISES INC DAVIDSON FILMS INC FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE PACIFIC TRUST MORTGAGE STATE FARM INSURANCE CLM OFFICE STATE FARM MUTL AUTO INSR C VALLEY YELLOW PAGES TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A15 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2000 202 ADVANCED AEROSPACE ALLTECH SERVICES CASTLEROCK DEVELOPMENT DOUBLE D FEED & SUPPLY FERRELLS AUTO REPAIR GANG NAIL TRUSS COMPANY NTH DEGREE PLASTANK SHETLER CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION 205 A & R WELDING SUPPLY COMPANY 219 CON WAY WESTERN EXPRESS SAN LUIS TRUCK SERVICE GARAGE INCORPORATED 225 FURNITURE HERBERT BROTHERS J V I CORPORATION OROWEAT FOODS COMPANY PACIFIC COAST LUMBER PASTA MERCATO SHORT TREE SERVICE TOWN & COUNTRY FENCING WESTERN PARCEL EXPRESS 235 AXENT GRAPHICS B & J ACCESSORIES HOME APPLIANCE SALES & REPAIR RHINO LINING OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 245 DAVIDSONS FURNITURE & INTERIORS GRIZZLE CONSTRUCTION HILL 4 WHEEL DRIVE L & F INDUSTRIES PACIFIC WEST TREE BROKERS CANDY CANE LANE CHRISTMAS TREES 251 PROGRESSIVE AUTO ART 255 WHITES DRYWALL 261 IMPERIAL MUFFLER SPECIALISTS IMPERIAL WELDING 267 BLISS, KEN WILD OATS BAKERIES INCORPORATED 269 JEFFERIS AUTOBODY 271 DIESELRO INCORPORATED 275 SMARDAN HATCHER SAN LUIS 281 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE 305 GARCIA, DOMINIC 438 SLOCO RECYCLES 600 MORGANS TRUCK & AUTO SERVICE 625 MATRIX MOBILE TELEVISION SAN LUIS PAPER COMPANY 645 ALAMO SELF STORAGE DAVIDS PLUMBING & HEATING HILEMAN, GRAYDON HOADLEYS AUTOBODY OBRIEN PORCELAIN COMPANY SINK FACTORY Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A16 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 2000 645 PADRE OPTICAL INCORPORATED REID'S AUTOBODY WORKS ROSARIO, RAY TILECO DISTRIBUTORS INCORPORATED TRUVATIV 650 ALVAREZ, ANA DAGUE, CLINT EASTERWOOD, J FAGUNDES, ANTHONY R HIDDEN HILLS MOBILODGE LANE, PAULINE LAZEY ACRES RECREATIONAL STORAGE MILBURN, ALEX OLLSEN, BILL SPEZIO, GERALD A WALTZ, ROBERT E 651 FARM BUREAU SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM BUREAU 675 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY SAN LUIS OBISPO PUMP DIVISON FARM SUPPLY COMPANY SAN LUIS OBISPO STORE SAN LUIS OBISPO FARM SUPPLY COMPANY SAN LUIS OBISPO PUMP DIVISON 715 STATE FARM INSURANCE CLAIMS OFFICES TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A17 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1995 202 A BETTER BEEP INC CARPET WAREHOUSE DOUBLE D FEED & SUPPLY FERRELL, BILL L MORGANS TRUCK & AUTO SVC TANK FARM AUTO REPAIR 205 A & R WELDING SUPPLY CO 219 CON WAY WESTERN EXPRESS SAN LUIS READY MIX 225 DESIGN ALLIANCE WELLS, G 235 DIAMOND MAGNETICS FRANKLINS RADIATOR SVC GENERAL APPLIANCE WAREHOUSE MITCHELLS DRAIN & CLEANING SVC PACIFIC WOOD DESIGN 245 ACCESSORY PRODUCTIONS POWDER DAVIDSONS WAREHOUSE DUVALS AUTOMOTIVE & MARINE GRIZZLE CONSTRUCTION WELLS & CO 261 IMPERIAL WELDING 269 BERRYHILL, THOMAS C 271 DIESELRO INC 273 SAN LUIS OBISPO MARBLE & GRNT VICTOR KEMP CO 275 SMARDEN HATCHER SAN LUIS 276 UNOCAL CORP 277 DANGELOS SAN LUIS OBISPO INC 281 SAN LUIS AUTO SALVAGE 305 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 600 JAMES E SMITH III OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 615 K 15 BD MATRIX 15 TV 625 MATRIX MOBIL TELEVISION SAN LUIS PAPER CO 635 ZUPANS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 645 ALAMO SELF STORAGE BRITISH VINTAGES INC EMGINEERNG DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT HOADLEYS AUTOBODY LANES CERAMIC STUDIO PADRE OPTICAL INC RAPER, RONALD L ROSARIO, RAY TILECO DISTRIBUTORS INC 650 ENGELBERT, FRANK HIDDEN HILLS MOBILODGE LAZEY ACRES RECREATIONAL STRG MARKS, LAMBERT Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A18 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1995 650 MIDDAUGH, TERRY MILBURN, ALEX NICHOLS, FLOYD OLLSEN, LEE SOLENBERGER, C V TURNER, B L WALTZ, ROBERT E 651 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM 659 CAL FARM INSURANCE WENDY LIMA 675 FARM SUPPLY CO 685 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A19 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1992 202 A BETTER BEEP BETTER BEEP DOUBLE D FEED&SPLY FOSTER JACK EXCVTNG KAYS FLOWERS&GIFTS SPECTRAVAC 205 A&R WELDING SPLY CO 219 CON WAY WSTRN EXPRS SANLUIS TRUCK SERV 225 OROWEAT FOODS CO 235 BAUR&GREEN FLR CVRG COLVARD CONSTR CO DIAMOND MAGNETICS GENL APLNC WRHSE MITCHELLS DRN&CLNG PAC WOOD DESIGN 245 ACCESSORY PRDCTNS DAVIDSONS WAREHOUSE DUVALS AUTOMTV&MRN GRIZZLE CONSTR WELLS GUY 255 WHITES DRYWALL 261 IMPERL WELDING 271 DIESELRO 273 TILE COLLECTION VICTOR KEMP CO 275 SMARDEN HATCHER SL 276 UNOCAL CORP ADM OFC 277 DANGELO&SONS KELLEY MACHINE&WLDG 281 SANLUIS AUTO SLVG 300 ALTAMIRANO, DANNY S 438 S L O C O RECYCLES 615 K 15 BD MATRX 15 TV 625 MATRIX MOBIL TV SANLUIS PAPER CO 635 ZUPANS EQUIP RENTAL 645 ALAMO SELF STORAGE BRITISH VINTAGE INC HOADLEYS AUTOBODY LANES CERAMIC STDO PADRE OPTICAL INC ROSARIO, RAY TILECO DISTB INC 650 CHAMBERS, MARY K FRALIC, FLOYD G LAZEY ACRES STORAGE MIDDAUGH, TERRY MILBURN, ALEX RODERS, RAY Cont'd)TANK FARM RD EDR Digital Archive 6926581.5 Page: A20 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1992 650 SOLENBERGER, C V SPRAGGINS, FLOYD 651 SLO CO FARM BUREAU 659 CALFARM INS AGENCY 675 SLO CO FARM SUPPLY TANK FARM RD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 6926581.5 Page: A21 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1985 TANK FARM RD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 6926581.5 Page: A22 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1985 TANK FARM RD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 6926581.5 Page: A23 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1981 TANK FARM RD POLK DIRECTORY CO 6926581.5 Page: A24 SourceTargetStreetCrossStreet 1977 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX E Sanborn Maps Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 April 05, 2022 6926581.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 04/05/22 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road 276, 325, 438, 471 Tank Farm Road Roux Associates Inc 555 12th Street Suite 250 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 6926581.3 Oakland, CA 94607 Taylor Barrett The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Roux Associates Inc were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. A9A1-495F-8E97 NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY SLO Tank Farm This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: A9A1-495F-8E97 Roux Associates Inc (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6926581 3 2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX F User Questionnaire ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire In order to qualify for the protection offered under the EPA All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) Standard, the User (entities seeking to use the ASTM E1527-13 Practice to complete an environmental site assessment of the property; i.e. Lenders and/or Borrowers) must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that AAI is not complete. This information should be the collective knowledge of the entities relying on the Phase I. Please note that you are not being asked to evaluate the property, but rather to provide your knowledge of information on the property. Site Name/Address:___________________________________________________________________________ Person Interviewed/Title:______________________________________________Date:____________________ If known, when was the property initially developed?________________________________________________ If different, when were the current building(s) on the property constructed?______________________________ 1. Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site (40 CFR 312.25). Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, see note 1 below) identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? Yes___ No___ If you answer yes, please include an explanation in the space provided below: 2. Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded in a registry (40 CFR 312.26). Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, see note 1 below) identify AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed against the property under federal, tribal, state, or local law? Engineering Controls are defined as physical modifications to a site or facility to reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or ground water on the property). Institutional Controls are defined as a legal or administrative restriction on the use of, or access to, a site or facility to 1) reduce or eliminate the potentia l for exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or ground water on the property, or 2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. Yes___ No___ If you answer yes, please include an explanation in the space provided below: Note 1 - In certain jurisdictions, federal, tribal, state, or local statutes, or regulations specify that environmental liens and AULs f be filed in judicial records rather than land title records. In such cases judicial records must be searched for environmental liens and and AULs. 3. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28). Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? Yes___ No___ If you answer yes, please include an explanation in the space provided below: 4. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29). a) Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? Yes___ No___ If you answer no, please include an explanation in the space provided below, including whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? 5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30). Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, as User: a. Do you know the past uses of the property? Yes___ No___ b. Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? Yes___ No___ c. Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? Yes___ No___ d. Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? Yes___ No___ If you answered yes to any of the questions above, please include an explanation in the space provided below: 6. The degree of obviousness of the presence of likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation (40 CFR 312.31). Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? Yes___ No___ If you answer yes, please include an explanation in the space provided below: Please provide the following property contact information: Property Owner: ________________________ Phone Number: _____________________________ Key Site Personnel: ______________________ Phone Number: _____________________________ Past Owner: ____________________________ Phone Number: _____________________________ Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX G Regulatory Response Documents CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS Return to City Clerk’s Office) The California Public Records Act Government Code 6250.et seq.)was enacted to ensure public access to public records. This form will enable us to accurately and efficiently fill your request.With the exception of certain State mandated records,or records that exceed the standard size,copies are 40 per page standard or legal size).DVDs of City Council or Planning Commission meetings are 29 each. NAME:DATE OF REQUEST: ADDRESS: PHONE:FAX: E MAIL: INFORMATION NEEDED:For each record,describe type,date,subject,title,etc.Please be very specific. YOUR REQUEST WILL BE PROCESSED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. California Government Code Section 6253 c).Each agency,upon a request for a copy of records,shall,within 10 days from receipt of the request,determine whether the request,in whole or in part,seeks copies of disclosable public records in the possession of the agency and shall promptly notify the person making the request of the determination and the reasons therefore.In unusual circumstances,the time limit prescribed in this section may be extended by written notice by the head of the agency or his or her designee to the person making the request,setting forth the reasons for the extension and the date on which a determination is expected to be dispatched.No notice shall specify a date that would result in an extension for more than 14 days.1 If you need assistance with this request or wish to review the records on site,please call the City Clerk’s Office in advance at 781 7100 to schedule an appointment.The City Clerk’s Office is located at 990 Palm Street,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401.You may email your request to cityclerk@slocity.org. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Forwarded to: Date Completed: Charge if any): Mailed:Picked up: E Mailed: 1As used in this section,unusual circumstances”means,but only to the extent reasonably necessary to the proper processing of the particular request:1)The need to search for and collect the requested records from field facilities or other establishments that are separate from the office processing the request.2)The need to search for,collect,and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records which are demanded in a single request.3)The need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed,with another agency having substantial interest in the determination of the request or among two or more components of the agency having substantial subject matter interest therein. G:\Blank Forms and Templates\Request for Public Records 08/16 4/4/22, 4:54 PM Fire Record Requests | City of San Luis Obispo, CA https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/fire-department/fire-administration/fire-records-requests 1/2 1. 2. Fire Record Requests Online Form To facilitate processing your records request, we encourage you to use the electronic form provided below which will be submitted directly to our Administration Office. Contact Information * First Name Missy Last Name Muilenburg Agency Roux Associates Address 555 12th St Address 2 City, State, ZIP Code Oakland Email Address mmuilenburg@rouxinc.com Phone Number 9549093151 Please provide detailed, specific information (date, time, event, location, incident number). * Record Description Roux Associates, Inc. will be conducting a Phase I ESA and would like to request files for the addresses 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, associated with APNs 076-352-061, 076-352-062, 076-381-021, 076-382-005, 076-383-001, and 076-383-002. Throughout the property’s entire history, documents we are particularly interested in include: former environmental investigations, i t l i l ti d t d ill If you prefer to contact us in person or US mail and/or have HIPAA documentation to submit in support of your request, please download and use the following form(s). Fire Incident Request Form HIPAA Release Form Deliver or mail to: City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department, 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 4/4/22, 4:54 PM Fire Record Requests | City of San Luis Obispo, CA https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/fire-department/fire-administration/fire-records-requests 2/2 YOUR REQUEST WILL BE PROCESSED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. California Government Code Section 6253 (c). Each agency, upon a request for a copy of records, shall, within 10 days from receipt of the request, determine whether the request, in whole or in part, seeks copies of disclosable public records in the possession of the agency and shall promptly notify the person making the request of the determination and the reasons therefore. In unusual circumstances, the time limit prescribed in this section may be extended by written notice by the head of the agency or his or her designee to the person making the request, setting forth the reasons for the extension and the date on which a determination is expected to be dispatched. No notice shall specify a date that would result in an extension for more than 14 days. Pursuant California Government Code Section 6254 (c) Personnel, medical, or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [are exempt from disclosure]. With the exception of certain records, report photocopies are 40¢ per page. If you need assistance with this request or wish to review the records on site, please call the City Fire Department in advance at 781-7380 to schedule an appointment. To access public documents, contact the City Clerk's Office, City Records Program. Thank you. To receive a copy of your submission, please fill out your email address below and submit. Email Address mmuilenburg@rouxinc.com SUBMIT For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later. Get Adobe Reader Now! 01. Initial Submission - Public Information Request Your Name: Company Name: Email: Phone Number: Information Requested: Attachments PRA Number: Requestor Name: Date Received: Year Staff Assigned to Respond:* More Response Time Needed?* Additional Response Time Comments Public Information Request Missy Muilenburg Roux Associates mmuilenburg@rouxinc.com 9549093151 Please be specific: Roux Associates, Inc. will be conducting a Phase I ESA and would like to request files for the addresses 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, associated with APNs 076-352-061, 076-352-062, 076-381-021, 076-382-005, 076-383- 001, and 076-383-002. Please see attached figure with the property boundary. Throughout the propertyâ€™s entire history, documents we are particularly interested in include: former environmental investigations, environmental violations, documented spills and/or leaks, underground storage tanks, aboveground storage tanks, fire reports/inspections, hazardous business permits, building permits, chemical storage/use, hazardous waste materials transportation/storage/use), etc. Admin PRA Number Assignment 2022-032 Missy Muilenburg 4/4/2022 2022 Dora Drexler Yes - 14 days No The District may need to request some of the requested documentation from the company that is currently in the process of scanning our files. Provide explanation for additional processing time For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later. Get Adobe Reader Now! 4/4/22, 4:56 PM Online Public Records Act Request Form - County of San Luis Obispo https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Planning-Building/Grid-Items/Community-Engagement/Public-Records-Request/Public-Records-Requests/…1/3 The Department of Planning and Building Permit Center is open by appointment only for limited building permit intake, correction returns/pick- up, and permit issuance.To set up an appointment, please call 805-781-5601. To submit electronic Building Permit or Land Use Permit Applications, please visit the Permitting (/Departments/Planning-Building/Grid- Items/Permitting.aspx) page. As of January 15, 2022, a technology fee of 6% will be added to all Planning and Building charges for permits processed by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. Planning & Building Departments/Planning- Building.aspx) County of San Luis Obispo Online Public Records Act Request Form Public Records Act Request First Name*:Missy Last Name*:Muilenburg Organization:Roux Associates Email*:mmuilenburg@rouxinc.com Records will be provided electronically to this email address. MENU Home.aspx) 4/4/22, 4:56 PM Online Public Records Act Request Form - County of San Luis Obispo https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Planning-Building/Grid-Items/Community-Engagement/Public-Records-Request/Public-Records-Requests/…2/3 Telephone*:9549093151 Requested Records*: would like to request les for the addresses 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, associated with APNs 076-352-061 076-352-062 076-381- Where applicable, include a contract or RFP number, APN and/or address (500 character limit) Date Records Requested From: 1/1/1900 Now Date Records Requested To: 4/4/2022 4:56:3 Now Security Check*:Enter security code: 356072 Submit County Government Center 1055 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 MENU 4/4/22, 4:56 PM Online Public Records Act Request Form - County of San Luis Obispo https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Planning-Building/Grid-Items/Community-Engagement/Public-Records-Request/Public-Records-Requests/…3/3 VIEW MAP https://www.google.com/maps/place/1055+Monterey+St,+San+Luis+Obispo,+CA+ 93408/@35.2821867,-120.6623615,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x80ecf103f884 6375:0x1a2ced6ddf2d515e!8m2!3d35.2821867!4d-120.6601675) County Phone Directory: 805-781-5000 Toll free: 800-834-4636) Connect with the County Contact the County (/Home/Contact-Us.aspx) User Terms (/Home/Online-Privacy,-Security,-and-Conditions-of-Use-Po.aspx) Privacy (/Home/Online-Privacy,-Security,-and-Conditions-of-Use-Po.aspx) SB 272 (/Home/Senate-Bill-No-272-(SB-272)-California-Public-Reco.aspx) Site Map (/Home/Site-Map.aspx) Accessibility (/Home/Disability-Access-Request-for-Public-Input.aspx) Copyright © County of San Luis Obispo, California MENU 4/4/22, 4:52 PM Public Records Request Form - County of San Luis Obispo https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Services/Plans-Reports/Public-Records-Request-Form.aspx 1/4 Public Works (/Departments/Public- Works.aspx) County of San Luis Obispo Public Records Request Form What is this service? California Public Records Act (CPRA) PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST FORM Per the California Public Records Act (CPRA), I hereby request reproduction of the following records maintained by the Department of Public Works and understand that there may be fees incurred in the reproduction of the records. Please complete the form below. If the Department of Public Works does not maintain your requested records this form will be forwarded to the correct department. Public Works Public Records Request First Name:Missy Last Name:Muilenburg Organization (If Applicable): Roux Associates MENU Home.aspx) 4/4/22, 4:52 PM Public Records Request Form - County of San Luis Obispo https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Services/Plans-Reports/Public-Records-Request-Form.aspx 2/4 Email:mmuilenburg@rouxinc.com U.S. phone number: 954 ) 909 - 3151 Fax: Mailing Address Street & Unit Number): 555 12th St City:Oakland State:California U.S. ZIP code:94607 Requested Records: Roux Associates, Inc. will be conducting a Phase I ESA and would like to request les for the addresses 276, 325, 438, d 471 T k F R d S L i Obi CA 93401(Where applicable, include a contract or RFP number, APN and/or address) Date Records Requested From: All time Today Date Records Requested To: 4/4/2022 Today How would you like to receive the requested records?: Submit Electronic Copy Paper Copy MENU 4/4/22, 4:52 PM Public Records Request Form - County of San Luis Obispo https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Services/Plans-Reports/Public-Records-Request-Form.aspx 3/4 PLEASE NOTE: The California Public Records Act (Gov’t Code Section 6250 et. seq.) applies to writings in County les “containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics.” The County will provide those documents to you, unless they are exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act or other legal reason prevents the documents from being disclosed to the public. County Government Center 1055 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 VIEW MAP https://www.google.com/maps/place/1055+Monterey+St,+San+Luis+Obispo,+CA+ 93408/@35.2821867,-120.6623615,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x80ecf103f884 6375:0x1a2ced6ddf2d515e!8m2!3d35.2821867!4d-120.6601675) County Phone Directory: 805-781-5000 Toll free: 800-834-4636) Connect with the County Contact the County (/Home/Contact-Us.aspx) User Terms (/Home/Online-Privacy,-Security,-and-Conditions-of-Use-Po.aspx) MENU 4/4/22, 4:52 PM Public Records Request Form - County of San Luis Obispo https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Services/Plans-Reports/Public-Records-Request-Form.aspx 4/4 Privacy (/Home/Online-Privacy,-Security,-and-Conditions-of-Use-Po.aspx) SB 272 (/Home/Senate-Bill-No-272-(SB-272)-California-Public-Reco.aspx) Site Map (/Home/Site-Map.aspx) Accessibility (/Home/Disability-Access-Request-for-Public-Input.aspx) Copyright © County of San Luis Obispo, California MENU For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later. Get Adobe Reader Now! Printed on Recycled Paper April 8, 2022 Missy Muilenburg Roux, Inc. mmuilenburg@rouxinc.com Public Records Request Number: 1-040422-08 Location(s): 276, 325, 438, and 471 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Dear Requestor: On April 4, 2022, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received your email of April 4, 2022, requesting records under the Public Records Act. After a thorough review of our files, no site records were found pertaining to the sites/facilities referenced above. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) may have records that pertain to this request for 276 & 438 Tank Farm Road. This unit tracks toxic waste generators, transporters manifests), and disposal facilities. If you are interested in this type of information, it can be identified by accessing the HWTS database at http://hwts.dtsc.ca.gov. If you are interested in retrieving detailed reports, additional charges may apply. Please contact the HWTS unit by email at hwtsreports@dtsc.ca.gov or by phone at (800) 618-6942 for further information. For copies of manifests, please send an email to mcr@dtsc.ca.gov. A large number of our records are available on EnviroStor, an online database that provides non-confidential, public access to DTSCs data management system. It tracks our cleanup, permitting, enforcement, and investigation efforts at hazardous waste facilities and sites with known or suspected contamination issues. EnviroStor is available 24/7, 365 days a year. The data reflects the latest updates as they are entered in the system. Access it from your computer or smartphone, the local library – anywhere Internet access is available. Just go to www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov. You’ll find a step-by-step tour of EnviroStor under the "How to Use EnviroStor" menu on the website. If you have any questions or would like further information regarding your request, please contact me at 916-255-6449 or via email at PubReqAct@DTSC.ca.gov Sincerely, Wyatt Mallory Wyatt Mallory Regional Records Coordinator 4/13/22, 11:37 AM Detailed Facility Report | ECHO | US EPA https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110013912597 1/4 Detailed Facility Report UNION OIL COMPANY OF CA 276 TANK FARM ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 FRS (Facility Registry Service) ID:110013912597 EPA Region:09 Latitude:35.247009 Longitude:-120.664349 Locational Data Source:EIS Industries:Pipeline Transportation Indian Country:N Enforcement and Compliance Summary Regulatory Information Clean Air Act (CAA):No Information Clean Water Act (CWA):No Information Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA): Active SQG, (CAR000054825) Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA):No Information Other Regulatory Reports Air Emissions Inventory (EIS):655211 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (eGGRT):No Information Toxic Releases (TRI):No Information Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI):CEDRI125333 Go To Enforcement/Compliance Details Known Data Problems Facility Summary Statute CAA Compliance Monitoring Activities (5 years)-- Date of Last Compliance Monitoring Activity -- Compliance Status -- Qtrs in Noncompliance (of 12)-- Qtrs with Significant Violation -- Informal Enforcement Actions (5 years)-- Formal Enforcement Actions (5 years)-- Penalties from Formal Enforcement Actions (5 years)-- EPA Cases (5 years)-- Penalties from EPA Cases (5 years)-- Statute RCRA Compliance Monitoring Activities (5 years)-- Date of Last Compliance Monitoring Activity -- Compliance Status No Violation Identified Qtrs in Noncompliance (of 12)0 Qtrs with Significant Violation 0 Informal Enforcement Actions (5 years)-- Formal Enforcement Actions (5 years)-- Penalties from Formal Enforcement Actions (5 years)-- EPA Cases (5 years)-- Penalties from EPA Cases (5 years)-- Facility/System Characteristics 4/13/22, 11:37 AM Detailed Facility Report | ECHO | US EPA https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110013912597 2/4 Facility/System Characteristics Facility Address Facility SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Codes No data records returned Facility NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) Codes Facility Tribe Information No data records returned FRS 110013912597 N 35.247009 -120.664349 CEDRI CAA CEDRI125333 N EIS CAA 655211 N 35.247009 -120.664349 RCRAInfo RCRA CAR000054825 SQG Active (H )N 35.246865 -120.660259 System Statute Identifier Universe Status Areas Permit Expiration Date Indian Country Latitude Longitude FRS 110013912597 UNION OIL COMPANY OF CA 276 TANK FARM ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 San Luis Obispo County CEDRI CAA CEDRI125333 UNION OIL COMPANY OF CA 276 TANK FARM ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 San Luis Obispo County EIS CAA 655211 UNION OIL COMPANY OF CA 276 TANK FARM ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 Stanislaus County RCRAInfo RCRA CAR000054825 ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM 276 TANK FARM RD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 San Luis Obispo County System Statute Identifier Facility Name Facility Address Facility County System Identifier SIC Code SIC Description EIS 655211 486110 Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil RCRAInfo CAR000054825 56291 Remediation Services System Identifier NAICS Code NAICS Description Reservation Name Tribe Name EPA Tribal ID Distance to Tribe (miles) Compliance Monitoring History (5 years) No data records returned Entries in italics are not counted in EPA compliance monitoring strategies or annual results. Compliance Summary Data Three-Year Compliance History by Quarter Statute Program/Pollutant/Violation Type QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4 QTR 5 QTR 6 QTR 7 QTR 8 QTR 9 QTR 10 QTR 11 QTR 12+ RCRA (Source ID: CAR000054825)04/01-06/30/19 07/01-09/30/19 10/01-12/31/19 01/01-03/31/20 04/01-06/30/20 07/01-09/30/20 10/01-12/31/20 01/01-03/31/21 04/01-06/30/21 07/01-09/30/21 10/01-12/31/21 01/01-03/31/22 Facility-Level Status No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified No Violation Identified Violation Agency Informal Enforcement Actions (5 Years) No data records returned Entries in italics are not counted as "informal enforcement actions" in EPA policies pertaining to enforcement response tools. Formal Enforcement Actions (5 Years) No data records returned Enforcement and Compliance Statute Source ID System Activity Type Compliance Monitoring Type Lead Agency Date Finding (if applicable) RCRA CAR000054825 No 04/09/2022 0 04/08/2022 Statute Source ID Current SNC (Significant Noncompliance)/HPV (High Priority Violation)Current As Of Qtrs with NC (Noncompliance) (of 12)Data Last Refreshed Statute System Source ID Type of Action Lead Agency Date Statute System Law/Section Source ID Type of Action Case No. Lead Agency Case Name Issued/Filed Date Settlements/Actions Settlement/Action Date Federal Penalty Assessed State/Local Penalty Assessed Penalty Amount Collected SEP Cost Comp Action Cost Environmental Conditions Watersheds No data records returned Assessed Waters From Latest State Submission (ATTAINS) 12-Digit WBD (Watershed Boundary Dataset) HUC (RAD (Reach Address Database)) WBD (Watershed Boundary Dataset) Subwatershed Name (RAD (Reach Address Database)) State Water Body Name (ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System)) Beach Closures Within Last Year Beach Closures Within Last Two Years Pollutants Potentially Related to Impairment Watershed with ESA (Endangered Species Act)-listed Aquatic Species? State Report Cycle Assessment Unit ID Assessment Unit Name Water Condition Cause Groups Impaired Drinking Water Use Aquatic Life Fish Consumption Use Recreation Use Other Use 4/13/22, 11:37 AM Detailed Facility Report | ECHO | US EPA https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110013912597 3/4 No data records returned Air Quality Nonattainment Areas No data records returned Pollutant Within Nonattainment Status Area?Nonattainment Status Applicable Standard(s)Within Maintenance Status Area?Maintenance Status Applicable Standard(s) Air Pollutant Report Pollutants Toxics Release Inventory History of Reported Chemicals Released in Pounds per Year at Site No data records returned Toxics Release Inventory Total Releases and Transfers in Pounds by Chemical and Year No data records returned TRI Facility ID Year Total Air Emissions Surface Water Discharges Off-Site Transfers to POTWs (Publicly Owned Treatment Works) Underground Injections Releases to Land Total On-Site Releases Total Off-Site Transfers Chemical Name EJSCREEN EJ Indexes Eleven environmental justice (EJ) indexes of EJSCREEN, EPA's screening tool for EJ concerns. EPA uses these indexes to identify geographic areas that may warrant further consideration or analysis for potential EJ concerns. The index values below are for the Census block group in which the facility is located. Note that use of these indexes does not designate an area as an "EJ community" or "EJ facility." EJSCREEN provides screening level indicators, not a determination of the existence or absence of EJ concerns. For more information, see the EJSCREEN home page. View EJSCREEN Report Demographic Profile of Surrounding Area (1 mile) This section provides demographic information regarding the community surrounding the facility. ECHO compliance data alone are not sufficient to determine whether violations at a particular facility had negative impacts on public health or the environment. Statistics are based upon the 2010 U.S. Census and 2014 - 2018 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year Summary and are accurate to the extent that the facility latitude and longitude listed below are correct. EPA’s spatial processing methodology considers the overlap between the selected radii and the census blocks for U.S. Census demographics) and census block groups (for ACS demographics) in determining the demographics surrounding the facility. For more detail about this methodology, see the DFR Data Dictionary. Community Particulate Matter (PM 2.5)57.5 Ozone 57.6 NATA Diesel PM 57.4 NATA Air Toxics Cancer Risk 57.3 NATA Respiratory Hazard Index (HI)57.2 Traffic Proximity 40.2 Lead Paint Indicator 51.5 National Priority List (NPL) Site Proximity 57.5 Risk Management Plan (RMP) Site Proximity 57.8 Hazardous Waste Proximity 37.1 Wastewater Discharge Proximity 5.9 Census Block Group EJ Indexes (percentile) 0 Number of EJ Indexes Above 80th Percentile Total Persons 3,280 Population Density 1,046/sq.mi. Housing Units in Area 1,668 General Statistics (U.S. Census) Total Persons 4,026 Percent People of Color 35% Households in Area 1,747 Households on Public Assistance 10 Persons With Low Income 1,125 Percent With Low Income 28% General Statistics (ACS (American Community Survey)) Radius of Selected Area 1 mi. Center Latitude 35.247009 Center Longitude -120.664349 Land Area 100% Water Area 0% Geography Less than $15,000 96 (5.5%) 15,000 - $25,000 175 (10.02%) 25,000 - $50,000 392 (22.45%) 50,000 - $75,000 265 (15.18%) Greater than $75,000 818 (46.85%) Income Breakdown (ACS (American Community Survey)) - Households (%) Children 5 years and younger 143 (4%) Minors 17 years and younger 429 (13%) Adults 18 years and older 2,852 (87%) Seniors 65 years and older 715 (22%) Age Breakdown (U.S. Census) - Persons (%) White 2,682 (82%) African-American 53 (2%) Hispanic-Origin 654 (20%) Asian/Pacific Islander 135 (4%) American Indian 37 (1%) Other/Multiracial 373 (11%) Race Breakdown (U.S. Census) - Persons (%) Less than 9th Grade 119 (4.21%) 9th through 12th Grade 140 (4.95%) High School Diploma 343 (12.12%) Some College/2-year 979 (34.61%) B.S./B.A. (Bachelor of Science/Bachelor of Arts) or More 1,249 (44.15%) Education Level (Persons 25 & older) (ACS (American Community Survey)) - Persons (%) 4/13/22, 11:37 AM Detailed Facility Report | ECHO | US EPA https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110013912597 4/4 LAST UPDATED ON MARCH 18, 2022 DATA REFRESH INFORMATION 4/13/22, 11:43 AM FRS Facility Detail Report | Envirofacts | US EPA https://frs-public.epa.gov/ords/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110065857923 1/2 Facility Registry Service Links: Facility Registry Service (FRS) Overview FRS Facility Query FRS Organization Query EZ Query FRS Physical Data Model FRS Geospatial Model Related Topics: Envirofacts FRS FRS Facility Detail Report UNOCAL - TANK FARM RD BULK STORAGE EPA Registry Id: 110065857923 276 TANK FARM RD SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 UNOCAL - TANK FARM RD 2000 ft The facility locations displayed come from the FRS Spatial Coordinates tables. They are the best representative locations for the displayed facilities based on the accuracy of the collection method and quality assurance checks performed against each location. The North American Datum of 1983 is used to display all coordinates. Environmental Interests Information System System Facility Name Information System Id/Report Link Environmental Interest Type Data Source Last Updated Date S I CALIFORNIA - ENVIROVIEW UNOCAL - TANK FARM RD BULK STORAGE 216203 STATE MASTER CA- ENVIROVIEW G S Additional EPA Reports: MyEnvironment Site Demographics Facility Coordinates Viewer Environmental Justice Map Viewer Watershed Report Standard Industrial Classification Codes (SIC) No SIC Codes returned. Facility Codes and Flags EPA Region:09 Duns Number: Congressional District Number:24 Legislative District Number: HUC Code/Watershed:18060006 / CENTRAL COASTAL US Mexico Border Indicator:NO Federal Facility: Tribal Land: Alternative Names No Alternative Names returned. Organizations No Organizations returned. National Industry Classification System Cod No NAICS Codes returned. Facility Mailing Addresses Affiliation Type Delivery Point City Nam REGIONAL BOARD CASEWORKER 895 AEROVISTA PLACE SUITE 101 SAN LUIS OBISPO Contacts Affiliation Type Full Name REGIONAL BOARD CASEWORKER DIANE KUKOL - CENTRAL COAST RWQCB (REGION 3) Query executed on: APR-13-2022 4/13/22, 11:43 AM FRS Facility Detail Report | Envirofacts | US EPA https://frs-public.epa.gov/ords/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110065857923 2/2 Last updated on September 24, 2015 For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later. Get Adobe Reader Now! Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX H User-Provided Documents Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) Prepared For: City of San Luis Obispo County of San Luis Obispo Prepared By: Marine Research Specialists December 2013 SCH #2009031001 In Memory of John Nall Senior Environmental Specialist County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Development Department January 14, 1956-August 30, 2012 Table of Contents Page December 2013 i Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ ES-1 Impact Summary Tables ................................................................................................... IST-1-1 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Proposed Project Objectives ......................................................................................... 1-4 1.2 Agency Use of the Document ....................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.1 Local and Regional ................................................................................................ 1-5 1.2.2 State........................................................................................................................ 1-6 1.2.3 Federal.................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3 Previous Studies and Reports........................................................................................ 1-6 1.4 EIR Process and Scope ................................................................................................. 1-8 1.5 EIR Contents ............................................................................................................... 1-10 2.0 Project Description ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Existing Setting Information ......................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1 Historical Use......................................................................................................... 2-5 2.2.2 Current Conditions ................................................................................................. 2-7 2.3 Proposed Remediation Activities ................................................................................ 2-13 2.3.1 Regulatory Agency Involvement/Collaborative Process ..................................... 2-15 2.3.2 Proposed Remediation Actions Overview ........................................................... 2-17 2.3.3 Project Areas Specific Remediation Plans ........................................................... 2-20 2.3.4 Building and Structure Demolition ...................................................................... 2-31 2.3.5 Pipeline Decommissioning .................................................................................. 2-32 2.3.6 Reconfiguration of Reservoir 2 ............................................................................ 2-34 2.3.7 Miscellaneous Clean-up ....................................................................................... 2-35 2.3.8 Construction Methods .......................................................................................... 2-37 2.3.9 Site Grading for Remediation and Pad Development .......................................... 2-47 2.3.10 Remediation Schedule, Employee, and Traffic Details ..................................... 2-49 2.3.11 Long-Term Monitoring Activities ..................................................................... 2-51 2.4 Restoration .................................................................................................................. 2-53 2.4.1 Earthwork ............................................................................................................. 2-54 2.4.2 Planting and Seeding............................................................................................ 2-56 2.4.3 Irrigation .............................................................................................................. 2-56 2.4.4 Weed Control ....................................................................................................... 2-56 2.5 Development Options ................................................................................................. 2-57 2.5.1 City Development Plan ........................................................................................ 2-57 2.5.2 County Development Plan ................................................................................... 2-68 2.6 Project Permitting Requirements ................................................................................ 2-76 2.6.1 City Development Plan ........................................................................................ 2-76 2.6.2 County Development Plan ................................................................................... 2-86 2.6.3 Other Potential Permits ........................................................................................ 2-89 2.7 References ................................................................................................................... 2-91 Table of Contents Page December 2013 ii Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology ........................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Cumulative Development Scenario ............................................................................... 3-2 3.1.1 Proposed Development in the City and County of San Luis Obispo ..................... 3-2 3.1.2 Caltrans .................................................................................................................. 3-7 3.1.3 Other Potential Stakeholders.................................................................................. 3-7 3.2 Cumulative Impact Analysis Methodology .................................................................. 3-7 3.3 References ..................................................................................................................... 3-7 4.0 Environmental Analysis ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases ............................................................................ 4.1-1 4.1.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.1-1 4.1.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 4.1-18 4.1.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.1-25 4.1.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................... 4.1-28 4.1.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .............................. 4.1-41 4.1.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.1-51 4.1.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.1-53 4.1.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.1-54 4.1.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.1-65 4.2 Biological Resources ................................................................................................. 4.2-1 4.2.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.2-3 4.2.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 4.2-38 4.2.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.2-43 4.2.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................... 4.2-44 4.2.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .............................. 4.2-67 4.2.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.2-74 4.2.7 Cumulative Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................................. 4.2-78 4.2.8 Mitigation Monitoring Program ........................................................................ 4.2-81 4.2.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.2-94 4.3 Transportation and Circulation .................................................................................. 4.3-1 4.3.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.3-1 4.3.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 4.3-10 4.3.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.3-13 4.3.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................... 4.3-14 4.3.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .............................. 4.3-16 4.3.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.3-27 4.3.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.3-28 4.3.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.3-37 4.3.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.3-41 4.4 Land Use .................................................................................................................... 4.4-1 4.4.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.4-2 4.4.2 Regulatory Setting – Applicable Land Use Plans, Policy, and Zoning .............. 4.4-5 4.4.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.4-13 4.4.4 Remediation Project Analysis ........................................................................... 4.4-14 4.4.5 City Development Plan Analysis ...................................................................... 4.4-16 Table of Contents Page December 2013 iii Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.4.6 County Development Plan Analysis ................................................................. 4.4-18 4.4.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.4-19 4.4.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.4-19 4.4.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.4-19 4.5 Water Resources ........................................................................................................ 4.5-1 4.5.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.5-2 4.5.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 4.5-15 4.5.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.5-17 4.5.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................... 4.5-18 4.5.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .............................. 4.5-31 4.5.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.5-34 4.5.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.5-43 4.5.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.5-44 4.5.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.5-48 4.6 Wastewater ................................................................................................................. 4.6-1 4.6.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.6-1 4.6.2 Regulatory Setting .............................................................................................. 4.6-3 4.6.3 Significance Criteria ........................................................................................... 4.6-5 4.6.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................................... 4.6-5 4.6.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................ 4.6-8 4.6.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.6-10 4.6.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.6-17 4.6.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.6-18 4.6.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.6-19 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources .................................................................................. 4.7-1 4.7.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.7-1 4.7.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 4.7-14 4.7.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.7-17 4.7.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................... 4.7-18 4.7.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .............................. 4.7-20 4.7.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.7-26 4.7.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.7-26 4.7.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.7-26 4.7.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.7-31 4.8 Noise and Vibration ................................................................................................... 4.8-1 4.8.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.8-1 4.8.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 4.8-14 4.8.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.8-22 4.8.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................... 4.8-23 4.8.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .............................. 4.8-28 4.8.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.8-30 4.8.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.8-32 4.8.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.8-33 4.8.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.8-36 Table of Contents Page December 2013 iv Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology ......................................................................... 4.9-1 4.9.1 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................ 4.9-2 4.9.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 4.9-19 4.9.3 Significance Criteria ......................................................................................... 4.9-22 4.9.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................... 4.9-23 4.9.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .............................. 4.9-35 4.9.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................... 4.9-35 4.9.7 Cumulative Analysis ......................................................................................... 4.9-35 4.9.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 4.9-36 4.9.9 References ......................................................................................................... 4.9-42 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources ............................................................................. 4.10-1 4.10.1 Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 4.10-1 4.10.2 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................................... 4.10-9 4.10.3 Significance Criteria ..................................................................................... 4.10-17 4.10.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................... 4.10-17 4.10.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................... 4.10-20 4.10.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................... 4.10-27 4.10.7 Cumulative Analysis ..................................................................................... 4.10-28 4.10.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .......................................................................... 4.10-30 4.10.9 References ..................................................................................................... 4.10-31 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................................... 4.11-1 4.11.1 Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 4.11-1 4.11.2 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................ 4.11-40 4.11.3 Significance Criteria ..................................................................................... 4.11-50 4.11.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................... 4.11-51 4.11.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................... 4.11-66 4.11.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................... 4.11-74 4.11.7 Cumulative Analysis ..................................................................................... 4.11-80 4.11.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .......................................................................... 4.11-82 4.11.9 References ..................................................................................................... 4.11-83 4.12 Population and Housing ........................................................................................... 4.12-1 4.12.1 Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 4.12-1 4.12.2 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................................... 4.12-6 4.12.3 Significance Criteria ....................................................................................... 4.12-8 4.12.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................. 4.12-9 4.12.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................ 4.12-9 4.12.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................... 4.12-12 4.12.7 Cumulative Analysis ..................................................................................... 4.12-14 4.12.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .......................................................................... 4.12-15 4.12.9 References ..................................................................................................... 4.12-15 4.13 Public Services and Utilities .................................................................................... 4.13-1 4.13.1 Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 4.13-1 4.13.2 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................ 4.13-13 4.13.3 Significance Criteria ..................................................................................... 4.13-17 Table of Contents Page December 2013 v Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................... 4.13-18 4.13.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................... 4.13-24 4.13.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................... 4.13-33 4.13.7 Cumulative Analysis ..................................................................................... 4.13-41 4.13.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .......................................................................... 4.13-46 4.13.9 References ..................................................................................................... 4.13-53 4.14 Recreation ................................................................................................................ 4.14-1 4.14.1 Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 4.14-1 4.14.2 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................................... 4.14-8 4.14.3 Significance Criteria ..................................................................................... 4.14-10 4.14.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................... 4.14-10 4.14.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................... 4.14-11 4.14.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................... 4.14-13 4.14.7 Cumulative Analysis ..................................................................................... 4.14-14 4.14.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .......................................................................... 4.14-16 4.14.9 References ..................................................................................................... 4.14-16 4.15 Agricultural Resources............................................................................................. 4.15-1 4.15.1 Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 4.15-1 4.15.2 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................ 4.15-10 4.15.3 Significance Criteria ..................................................................................... 4.15-25 4.15.4 Impact Methodology ..................................................................................... 4.15-25 4.15.5 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................... 4.15-26 4.15.6 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................... 4.15-32 4.15.7 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................... 4.15-34 4.15.8 Cumulative Analysis ..................................................................................... 4.15-34 4.15.9 Mitigation Monitoring Plan .......................................................................... 4.15-35 4.15.10 References .................................................................................................... 4.15-35 5.0 Alternatives Analysis .................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Description of Alternatives ........................................................................................... 5-2 5.1.1 No Project Alternative ........................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.2 Remediation/Restoration Alternatives ................................................................... 5-5 5.1.3 Development Alternatives ................................................................................... 5-14 5.1.4 Transportation Alternatives ................................................................................. 5-28 5.1.6 Other County Development Alternatives............................................................. 5-31 5.2 Alternatives Screening Analysis ................................................................................. 5-32 5.2.1 Remediation Alternatives..................................................................................... 5-32 5.2.2 Development Alternatives ................................................................................... 5-41 5.2.3 Transportation Alternatives ................................................................................. 5-51 5.2.4 Other County Development Alternatives............................................................. 5-56 5.3 Environmental Analysis of Selected Alternatives ...................................................... 5-56 5.3.1 No Project Alternative ......................................................................................... 5-57 5.3.2 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation ...................................................... 5-61 5.3.3 Reduced Development ......................................................................................... 5-67 5.4 Environmentally Superior Alternative ........................................................................ 5-73 Table of Contents Page December 2013 vi Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5.4.1 Remediation ......................................................................................................... 5-74 5.4.2 Development ........................................................................................................ 5-75 5.5 References ................................................................................................................... 5-86 6.0 Other CEQA-Mandated Sections .............................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes That Would be Caused by the Proposed Project Should It Be Implemented .................................................... 6-1 6.2 Growth-Inducing Impacts ............................................................................................. 6-1 6.2.1 Removal of an Impediment to Growth .................................................................. 6-2 6.2.2 Economic Growth .................................................................................................. 6-2 6.2.3 Precedent-Setting Action ....................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.4 Development of Open Space ................................................................................. 6-3 6.3 Energy Conservation ..................................................................................................... 6-3 Table of Contents Page December 2013 vii Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR List of Figures Figure 1-1 Location of the Project Site............................................................................... 1-2 Figure 2-1 Project Location ................................................................................................ 2-2 Figure 2-2 Project Site ........................................................................................................ 2-4 Figure 2-3 Project Site Existing Pipelines ........................................................................ 2-10 Figure 2-4 Airport Safety Zones ....................................................................................... 2-11 Figure 2-5 Water Monitoring Wells and Netted Areas .................................................... 2-12 Figure 2-6 Project Site Existing Affected Areas .............................................................. 2-14 Figure 2-7 Proposed Remediation Areas .......................................................................... 2-18 Figure 2-8 Reservoir 5 and 7 Remediation - Proposed Cap Cross Section ...................... 2-25 Figure 2-9 Reservoir 4 Remediation - Proposed Cap Cross Section ................................ 2-26 Figure 2-10 Reservoir 3 Remediation - Proposed Cap Cross Section ................................ 2-29 Figure 2-11 Miscellaneous Clean-up Areas ....................................................................... 2-36 Figure 2-12 Proposed Work Areas, Staging Areas, and Site Access ................................. 2-39 Figure 2-13 Proposed Truck Routes ................................................................................... 2-41 Figure 2-14 Proposed Borrow Sites .................................................................................... 2-44 Figure 2-15 Conceptual Restoration Plan ........................................................................... 2-55 Figure 2-16 Project Site Zoning Designations under the Existing City AASP .................. 2-58 Figure 2-17 Proposed City Development Plan ................................................................... 2-59 Figure 2-18 Project Site Zoning Designations under the City Development Plan - Proposed Zoning Designations and Bike Paths .............................................. 2-60 Figure 2-19 Possible Sports Fields Configuration .............................................................. 2-64 Figure 2-20 City Development Option Phasing ................................................................. 2-67 Figure 2-21 Existing County Land Use Designations ........................................................ 2-70 Figure 2-22 Proposed County Land Use Designations....................................................... 2-71 Figure 2-23 County Development Option Phasing ............................................................ 2-75 Figure 2-24 Proposed Modification to the AASP Cluster Development Zone (CDZ) with Proposed Project Zoning ......................................................................... 2-80 Figure 2-25 Proposed Modification to ACOS Reserve Spaces .......................................... 2-82 Figure 2-26 Proposed ACOS Reserve Area Location Site Plan ......................................... 2-83 Figure 2-27 City Development Plan - Lot Configuration and Phasing Map ...................... 2-85 Figure 2-28 County Development Plan - Lot Configuration and Phasing Map ................. 2-88 Figure 3-1 Location of Tier I Cumulative Projects ............................................................ 3-5 Figure 4.1-1 Higuera Street Meteorological Station Wind Rose - 2008 ............................ 4.1-7 Figure 4.1-2 Areas Requiring Asbestos ATCM Geological Analysis and Requirements 4.1-10 Figure 4.1-3 California Greenhouse Gas Emissions......................................................... 4.1-16 Figure 4.2-1 Overview of Watersheds that Impact Chevron Tank Farm Property – Existing Conditions ........................................................................................ 4.2-5 Figure 4.2-2 Plant Communities on the Project Site .......................................................... 4.2-8 Figure 4.2-3 Wetlands and Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Habitat ........................................ 4.2-11 Figure 4.2-4 Geographic Distribution of Plant Species of Concern ................................. 4.2-23 Figure 4.3-1 Study Area Intersections ................................................................................ 4.3-2 Figure 4.3-2 Existing a.m. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..................................................... 4.3-6 Figure 4.3-3 Existing p.m. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes..................................................... 4.3-7 Table of Contents Page December 2013 viii Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-4 Proposed Truck Routes ................................................................................ 4.3-15 Figure 4.3-5 Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................. 4.3-18 Figure 4.3-6 Project Trip Assignment (a.m./p.m.) ........................................................... 4.3-19 Figure 4.3-7 Cumulative AM Traffic Volumes Without Project ..................................... 4.3-29 Figure 4.3-8 Cumulative PM Traffic Volumes Without Project ...................................... 4.3-30 Figure 4.4-1 Project Site and Context Map ........................................................................ 4.4-3 Figure 4.4-2 Existing Land Use .......................................................................................... 4.4-4 Figure 4.4-3 County of San Luis Obispo County Land Use Categories ............................ 4.4-8 Figure 4.4-4 City of San Luis Obispo Land Use Designations ........................................ 4.4-12 Figure 4.5-1 SLO Valley Watersheds and Groundwater Basin .......................................... 4.5-3 Figure 4.5-2 Overview of the Watersheds that Relate to the Chevron Tank Farm Property Site................................................................................................... 4.5-4 Figure 4.5-3 On-site Isolated Catchments Existing Conditions ......................................... 4.5-9 Figure 4.5-4 100-Year Flood Plain Existing Conditions .................................................. 4.5-10 Figure 4.5-5 Project Site Groundwater Elevation Contours and Well Locations ............. 4.5-13 Figure 4.5-6 Overview of Watersheds for Tank Farm Project Site Post Remediation and Development ........................................................................................ 4.5-25 Figure 4.5-7 Illustration of Typical Post Remediation Tank Farm Creek Channel.......... 4.5-26 Figure 4.5-8 On-site Isolated Catchments Post Remediation and Development .............. 4.5-30 Figure 4.5-9 100-Year Flood Plan Post Remediation and Development ......................... 4.5-35 Figure 4.6-1 Proposed Location of Wastewater Treatment Facility-County Development Plan ........................................................................................ 4.6-11 Figure 4.7-1 Regional Geologic Map ................................................................................. 4.7-3 Figure 4.7-2 Boring Location Map ..................................................................................... 4.7-4 Figure 4.8-1 Sensitive Receptors and Noise Monitoring Locations near the Project Site . 4.8-9 Figure 4.8-2 Airport Land Use Plan Single Event Noise Contours at Runway Capacity 4.8-11 Figure 4.8-3 Airport Land Use Plan CNEL Noise Contours at Runway Capacity .......... 4.8-12 Figure 4.8-4 Land Use Compatibility for New Development Near Transportation Noise Sources.............................................................................................. 4.8-17 Figure 4.9-1 Drawing of Mission San Luis Obispo, 1793 .................................................. 4.9-8 Figure 4.9-2 Lithograph of San Luis Obispo, 1865 .......................................................... 4.9-10 Figure 4.10-1 Key Viewing Locations ............................................................................... 4.10-3 Figure 4.10-2 Key Viewing Location No. 1 from Tank Farm Road west of the Project Site - Current ................................................................................................ 4.10-4 Figure 4.10-3 Key Viewing Location No. 2 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site - Current.............................................................................. 4.10-5 Figure 4.10-4 Key Viewing Location No. 3 from Tank Farm Road at the east end of the Project Site - Current.............................................................................. 4.10-6 Figure 4.10-5 Key Viewing Location No. 4 from Broad Street (State Route 227) north of the Project Site – Current......................................................................... 4.10-7 Figure 4.10-6 Key Viewing Location No. 5 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site – Current......................................................................... 4.10-8 Figure 4.10-7 BLM Visual Inventory Class Determination ............................................. 4.10-10 Figure 4.10-8 USDA Scenic Class Determination ........................................................... 4.10-11 Table of Contents Page December 2013 ix Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-9 Key Viewing Location No. 1 from Tank Farm Road west of the Project Site - Proposed ............................................................................... 4.10-21 Figure 4.10-10 Key Viewing Location No. 2 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site – Proposed .................................................................... 4.10-22 Figure 4.10-11 Key Viewing Location No. 3 from Tank Farm Road at the east end of the Project Site – Proposed .................................................................... 4.10-23 Figure 4.10-12 Key Viewing Location No. 4 from Broad Street (State Route 227) north of the Project Site - Proposed ........................................................... 4.10-24 Figure 4.10-13 Key Viewing Location No. 5 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site looking southwest - Proposed ...................................... 4.10-29 Figure 4.11-1 Soil Sampling Locations .............................................................................. 4.11-9 Figure 4.11-2 Soil Gas Sampling Locations ..................................................................... 4.11-11 Figure 4.11-3 Surface and Ground Water Sampling Locations ....................................... 4.11-14 Figure 4.11-4 Allowable Population Densities within the SLOCRA Aviation Safety Areas ............................................................................................... 4.11-33 Figure 4.11-5 Number of Wildlife Strikes at Primary Commercial Airports in California (1990-2010) .............................................................................. 4.11-35 Figure 4.11-6 Number of Take-off and Landings per Strike at Primary Commercial Airports in California (1990-2010) ............................................................ 4.11-36 Figure 4.11-7 Number of Wildlife Strikes at SLOCRA ................................................... 4.11-37 Figure 4.11-8 Number of Wildlife Strikes at SLOCRA by Phase of Flight ..................... 4.11-38 Figure 4.11-9 Effect of Wildlife Strike on Aircraft Flight at SLOCRA ........................... 4.11-38 Figure 4.11-10 Level of Damage to Aircraft from Wildlife Strike at SLOCRA ................ 4.11-39 Figure 4.11-11 Wastewater Treatment Facility Chlorine and Sulfur Dioxide Hazards ..... 4.11-75 Figure 4.11-12 Airport Safety Areas and Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility ......... 4.11-77 Figure 4.13-1 Public Services ............................................................................................. 4.13-2 Figure 4.14-1 City of San Luis Obispo Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities .............. 4.14-4 Figure 4.14-2 City of San Luis Obispo Existing and Proposed Bicycle Transportation Plans .................................................................................... 4.14-6 Figure 4.15-1 Existing Uses of Land .................................................................................. 4.15-6 Figure 4.15-2 Farmland Classification ............................................................................... 4.15-7 Figure 4.15-3 California Revised Storie Index ................................................................... 4.15-7 Figure 4.15-4 City’s Margarita Area Specific Plan ............................................................ 4.15-9 Figure 4.15-5 Project Development on Prime Farmland .................................................. 4.15-27 Figure 5-1 Mass Excavation Areas ..................................................................................... 5-7 Figure 5-2 Excavation Areas for Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation .............. 5-12 Figure 5-3 Development Plan Consistent with City Airport Area Specific Plan .............. 5-16 Figure 5-4 Development Plan Consistent with County General Plan ............................... 5-20 Figure 5-5 Reduced City Development Plan ..................................................................... 5-23 Figure 5-6 Reduced County Development Plan ................................................................ 5-26 Figure 5-7 Location of Transportation Alternatives ......................................................... 5-29 Table of Contents Page December 2013 x Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR List of Tables Table 2-1 Proposed Remediation by Operable Unit ....................................................... 2-21 Table 2-2 Borrow Site Quantities .................................................................................... 2-43 Table 2-3 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities......................................................... 2-48 Table 2-4 Employee Requirements for Remediation ...................................................... 2-49 Table 2-5 Equipment Requirements for Remediation ..................................................... 2-49 Table 2-6 Remediation Traffic Levels ............................................................................ 2-50 Table 2-7 Monitoring Traffic Levels............................................................................... 2-51 Table 2-8 City Development Plan Summary .................................................................. 2-62 Table 2-9 Possible Development Land Use Mix- City Development Option ................. 2-63 Table 2-10 Development Construction Equipment (per phase) ........................................ 2-66 Table 2-11 City Development Plan Traffic Generation by Phase ..................................... 2-68 Table 2-12 City Development Plan Possible Build-Out – Water Use and Traffic ............ 2-69 Table 2-13 County Development Plan Summary.............................................................. 2-73 Table 2-14 Possible Development Land Use Mix- County Development Option ............ 2-74 Table 2-15 County Development Plan Traffic Generation by Phase ................................ 2-76 Table 2-16 County Development Plan Possible Build-Out – Water Use and Traffic ....... 2-77 Table 2-17 San Luis Obispo City Development Plan Comparison of Existing AASP and Proposed Land Uses and Acreage for the Project Site ................................... 2-78 Table 2-18 San Luis Obispo County General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Comparison of Existing and Proposed Land Use and Acres .......................... 2-87 Table 2-19 Anticipated Federal, State, and Local Permits ................................................ 2-89 Table 3-1 List of Tier I Cumulative Projects (Specific Projects) ...................................... 3-3 Table 3-2 List of Tier II Cumulative Projects (Area and General Plans) .......................... 3-6 Table 4.1-1 State and National Criteria Air Pollutant Standards, Effects, and Sources ... 4.1-3 Table 4.1-2 Monitoring Results at the Higuera Street Monitoring Station ....................... 4.1-6 Table 4.1-3 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Central Coast Air Basin .............................................................................................................. 4.1-6 Table 4.1-4 San Luis Obispo County Ozone Precursors and PM Emissions by Source ... 4.1-8 Table 4.1-5 Global Warming Potential of Various Gases ............................................... 4.1-13 Table 4.1-6 Electricity Generation Resource Mix and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ....... 4.1-15 Table 4.1-7 Current Activities Emissions ....................................................................... 4.1-17 Table 4.1-8 SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Operational Emissions Impacts ......................................................................................................... 4.1-26 Table 4.1-9 SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Construction Emissions Impacts ......................................................................................................... 4.1-26 Table 4.1-10 SLOAPCD Board-Approved GHG Thresholds For SLO County ............... 4.1-27 Table 4.1-11 Unmitigated Remediation Emissions ........................................................... 4.1-30 Table 4.1-12 Remediation Emissions Mitigated ............................................................... 4.1-34 Table 4.1-13 City Development Plan Construction Emissions by Phase.......................... 4.1-42 Table 4.1-14 City Development Plan Operational Emissions by Phase ........................... 4.1-43 Table 4.1-15 City Development Plan Operational Emissions by Phase - Mitigated ........ 4.1-47 Table 4.1-16 City Development Plan Operational GHG Emissions by Phase .................. 4.1-49 Table 4.2-1 Definitions of Plants Species of Concern .................................................... 4.2-13 Table of Contents Page December 2013 xi Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern .............................................................. 4.2-16 Table 4.2-3 Definitions of Wildlife Species of Concern ................................................. 4.2-25 Table 4.2-4 Regional Wildlife Species of Concern ......................................................... 4.2-26 Table 4.2-5 Estimated Impacts to Rare Plant Species and Sensitive Habitat Areas ....... 4.2-46 Table 4.2-6 Estimated Impacts to Sensitive Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Habitat ............. 4.2-47 Table 4.2-7 Estimated Impacts to Wetlands/Waters of the U.S. including Federal and State Wetlands ............................................................................................ 4.2-58 Table 4.2-8 Preliminary Habitat Impacts of Remediation Project .................................. 4.2-62 Table 4.2-9 Estimated Impacts to Rare Plant Species and Sensitive Habitat Areas ....... 4.2-67 Table 4.2-10 Area of Development Phase Wetland Impacts ............................................ 4.2-70 Table 4.3-1 Intersection Levels of Service & Delay ......................................................... 4.3-8 Table 4.3-2 Corridor Level of Service Thresholds............................................................ 4.3-8 Table 4.3-3 Freeway Segment Level of Service Thresholds............................................. 4.3-9 Table 4.3-4 Existing Conditions, Level of Service Summary ........................................... 4.3-9 Table 4.3-5 Existing Conditions, Corridor Summary ..................................................... 4.3-10 Table 4.3-6 Existing Conditions, Freeway Segments ..................................................... 4.3-10 Table 4.3-7 Estimated Project Traffic Generation- City Development Plan .................. 4.3-17 Table 4.3-8 Existing Plus Project, Intersection Conditions............................................. 4.3-20 Table 4.3-9 Existing Plus Project, Corridor Summary .................................................... 4.3-21 Table 4.3-10 Existing Plus Project, Freeway Conditions .................................................. 4.3-21 Table 4.3-11 County Development Plan Trip Generation Comparison ............................ 4.3-27 Table 4.3-12 Cumulative Plus Project, Intersection Conditions ....................................... 4.3-31 Table 4.3-13 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Corridor Summary ............................ 4.3-33 Table 4.3-14 Cumulative Plus Project, Freeway Conditions ............................................ 4.3-34 Table 4.5-1 Summary Of Peak Surface Water Flows – Existing Conditions ................... 4.5-6 Table 4.5-2 Summary Of Peak Flows and Volumes for Tank Farm Creek Off-site Discharge - Existing Conditions .................................................................... 4.5-7 Table 4.5-3 Estimated Water Demand for Remediation and Restoration by Year acre-feet per year) ...................................................................................... 4.5-20 Table 4.5-4 Water Level Interference ............................................................................. 4.5-21 Table 4.5-5 Estimated Changes to Ground Water Storage in Vicinity of Project Site .. 4.5-21 Table 4.5-6 Summary Of Peak Surface Water Flows – Post Remediation Conditions .. 4.5-28 Table 4.5-7 Summary Of Peak Flows and Volumes for Tank Farm Creek Off-site Discharge – Post Remediation and Development Conditions ..................... 4.5-28 Table 4.5-8 Summary Of Peak Surface Water Flows – Post Development Conditions . 4.5-33 Table 4.5-9 Water Supply Requirements for Full Development ..................................... 4.5-36 Table 4.5-10 Project Groundwater Extractions by Development Phase acre-feet per year) ....................................................................................... 4.5-37 Table 4.5-11 Long-Term Yield and Source Capacity for Groundwater Wells ................. 4.5-38 Table 4.6.1 Estimated Wastewater Flows for the City Tank Farm Development Plan, Non-drought Year ......................................................................................... 4.6-9 Table 4.6.2 Estimated Wastewater Flows for the County Tank Farm Development, Non-drought Year ........................................................................................ 4.6-13 Table of Contents Page December 2013 xii Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.6.3 Estimated Seasonal Recycled Water Supply and Demand, Wet Year – County Development Option ....................................................................... 4.6-14 Table 4.7-1 Partial List of Nearby Regional Faults ........................................................... 4.7-6 Table 4.8-1 Representative Environmental Noise Levels ................................................. 4.8-4 Table 4.8-2 Typical Levels of Ground-Borne Vibration ................................................... 4.8-8 Table 4.8-3 Roadway Noise Levels: Noise Element and Calculated Current ................. 4.8-10 Table 4.8-4 Existing Ambient Noise Levels Near the Project Site ................................. 4.8-14 Table 4.8-5 Noise Element Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure - Stationary Sources ....................................................................................... 4.8-16 Table 4.8-6 Noise Element Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure - Transportation Sources ................................................................................ 4.8-18 Table 4.8-7 City of San Luis Obispo Construction Noise Limits ................................... 4.8-21 Table 4.8-8 City of San Luis Obispo Exterior Noise Limits ........................................... 4.8-21 Table 4.8-9 Equipment and Noise Impacts on Mobile Home Park – Reservoir 4 and Flower Mound Activities ..................................................................... 4.8-25 Table 4.8-10 Roadway Noise Levels: With Project .......................................................... 4.8-29 Table 4.8-11 Sound Loss by Various Noise Barrier Materials ......................................... 4.8-32 Table 4.9-1 Chevron Tank Farm Features and Testing Procedures ................................ 4.9-14 Table 4.9-2 Native American Contacts for the Chevron Tank Farm Project .................. 4.9-17 Table 4.9-3 Paleontological Sensitivity Categories ........................................................ 4.9-24 Table 4.9-4 Project Site Features and CRHR Significance Determinations ................... 4.9-28 Table 4.10-1 Indicators of Visual Sensitivity .................................................................. 4.10-11 Table 4.11-1 Summary of Project Site 2004 Baseline HHRA Results ........................... 4.11-28 Table 4.11-2 Planning Requirements and Density Adjustments for Land Uses within the SLOCRA Aviation Safety Areas .............................................. 4.11-32 Table 4.11-3 Summary of Potential Health Effects Associated with Development Areas .......................................................................................................... 4.11-53 Table 4.11-4 Zoning Breakdown of CDZ Area .............................................................. 4.11-69 Table 4.11-5 Population Density Calculations for City Development Plan.................... 4.11-71 Table 4.11-6 Population Density Calculations for County Development Plan ............... 4.11-79 Table 4.12-1 SLOCOG Medium Population Growth Estimate, 2010 to 2040 ................. 4.12-2 Table 4.12-2 County of San Luis Obispo Household Population Growth Estimates ....... 4.12-3 Table 4.12-3 City/County Census Housing Counts in San Luis Obispo City and County, 2010 ................................................................................................ 4.12-3 Table 4.12-4 Projected Housing Need By Income ............................................................ 4.12-5 Table 4.12-5 SLOCOG Medium County Non-Farm Employment Estimates, 2010 to 2040 ................................................................................................ 4.12-6 Table 4.12-6 Jobs/Housing Imbalance 2010 ..................................................................... 4.12-6 Table 4.12-7 City Project Employee Generation .............................................................. 4.12-9 Table 4.12-8 City Project Jobs/Housing Ratio Estimate ................................................. 4.12-10 Table 4.12-9 County Project Employee Generation ....................................................... 4.12-12 Table 4.12-10 County Project Jobs/Housing Ratio Estimate ............................................ 4.12-12 Table 4.13-1 San Luis Obispo County Electricity and Gas Consumption ........................ 4.13-8 Table 4.13-2 PG&E Planning Area Electricity Consumption (Millions of kWh) ............ 4.13-9 Table of Contents Page December 2013 xiii Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.13-3 SCG Planning Area Gas Consumption (Millions of Therms) ..................... 4.13-9 Table 4.13-4 San Luis Obispo County Class III Landfill Capacity and Usage ............... 4.13-11 Table 4.13.5 City Water Source Availability .................................................................. 4.13-13 Table 4.13-6 Estimated Project Electricity Usage – City Development Plan ................. 4.13-28 Table 4.13-7 Estimated Natural Gas Usage – City Development Plan ........................... 4.13-29 Table 4.13-8 City Development Plan - Solid Waste Generation Estimates .................... 4.13-30 Table 4.13-9 Estimated Project Electricity Usage – County Development Plan ............ 4.13-36 Table 4.13-10 Estimated Natural Gas Usage – County Development Plan ...................... 4.13-37 Table 4.13-11 County Development Plan - Solid Waste Generation Estimates ............... 4.13-39 Table 4.14-1 Existing Park Acreage.................................................................................. 4.14-2 Table 4.14-2 Existing and Proposed County Bikeways – City of San Luis Obispo Fringe............................................................................................... 4.14-5 Table 4.14-3 1983 National Recreation and Park Association Standards for Parks ......... 4.14-7 Table 4.15-1 Soil Characteristics and Farmland Classifications ....................................... 4.15-6 Table 5-1 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities – No Project Alternative .................. 5-4 Table 5-2 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities – Mass Excavation ........................... 5-8 Table 5-3 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities – Replace Remedial caps with Excavation....................................................................................................... 5-13 Table 5-4 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater for Residential Development ................................................................................................... 5-15 Table 5-5 Possible Development Land Use Mix- City AASP Development ................. 5-17 Table 5-6 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater for City AASP Development ........................................................................................ 5-18 Table 5-7 Possible Development Land Use Mix- County General Plan Development .. 5-19 Table 5-8 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater for County General Plan Development ............................................................................. 5-21 Table 5-9 Possible Development Land Use Mix - Reduced City Development Plan ..... 5-24 Table 5-10 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater - Reduced City Development Plan ................................................................................... 5-24 Table 5-11 Possible Development Land Use Mix - Reduced County Development Plan ........................................................................................... 5-27 Table 5-12 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater - County Development Plan ........................................................................................... 5-28 Table 5-13 Comparison of Remediation Alternatives with the Proposed Project ............ 5-35 Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project ........... 5-43 Table 5-15 Comparison of Transportation Alternatives with the Proposed Project ......... 5-53 Table 5-16 Remediation Emissions-No Project Alternative-Mitigated ............................ 5-59 Table 5-17 Estimated Water Demand for Remediation and Restoration by Year (acre-feet per year)-No Project Alternative ....................................... 5-61 Table 5-18 Remediation Emissions-Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation Alternative-Mitigated ................................................................... 5-63 Table 5-19 Development Construction Emissions by Phase-Reduced Development Alternative ................................................................................ 5-69 Table of Contents Page December 2013 xiv Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-20 Development Operational Emissions by Phase-Reduced Development Alternative-Mitigated ............................................................... 5-70 Table 5-21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts ............................. 5-78 Table of Contents December 2013 xv Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Volume II – Response to Comments (CD only) Volume III – Technical Appendices (CD only) Appendix A – Project Description Information A.1 Remedial Action Plan (Applicant Prepared) A.2 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Feasibility Assessment (Applicant Prepared) A.3 Other Figures and Drawings (Applicant Prepared) Appendix B – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases B.1 Air and Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations and Methodology B.2 Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report (Applicant Prepared) Appendix C – Biological Resources C.1 Phase I Biological Resources Studies (Applicant Prepared) C.2 Phase II Biological Resources Studies (Applicant Prepared) C.3 Phase III Biological Resources Studies (Applicant Prepared) C.4 Comprehensive Fairy Shrimp Wet and Dry Season Survey Reports (Applicant Prepared) C.5 Protocol-Level California Red-Legged Frog Survey Report (Applicant Prepared) C.6 Burrowing Owl Survey Report (Applicant Prepared) C.7 Description and Analysis of the Botanical Resources at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility (Applicant Prepared) C.8 An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the US (Applicant Prepared) C.9 Operational Guidebook to Assessment of the Riverine Waters/Wetland Functions Applicant Prepared) C.10 Santa Fe Road Realignment Biological Assessment C.11 Biological Resource Survey Letter-Report for the Off-Site Flower Mound Impact Area (Applicant Prepared) C.12 75% Basis of Design Report- Landscape Restoration (Applicant Prepared) C.13 90-Day VPFS 2012 Report (Applicant Prepared) C.14 California Red-Legged Frog 2012 Survey Report (Applicant Prepared) C.15 Wetland Disturbance Calculations Memo (Applicant Prepared) Appendix D – Traffic Analysis Report Appendix E – Preliminary Policy Consistency Analysis Appendix F – Hydrology Study (Applicant Prepared) Appendix G – Water Supply Assessment Reports G.1 City of San Luis Obispo Water Supply Assessment G.2 County Development Project Water Supply Assessment G.3 Former Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Proposed Development-Use of Groundwater as a Source of Potable Water Appendix H – Risk Assessment Documents H.1 Tank Farm Human Health Risk Assessment (Applicant Prepared) Table of Contents December 2013 xvi Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR H.2 Letter from Agency on Adequacy of Human Health Risk Assessment H.2 Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (Applicant Prepared) H.3 Report on Shallow Soil Assessment Activities for Arsenic, Northeast of Reservoir 2, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm (Applicant Prepared) H.4 Arsenic Assessment (Applicant Prepared) Appendix I – Notice of Preparation (NOP) and NOP Comment Letters Appendix J – List of Mitigation Measures Appendix K – Draft Mitigation Monitoring Plan Appendix L – List of EIR Preparers List of Abbreviations and Acronyms Appendix M – Persons and Agencies Contacted Appendix N – List of Abbreviations and Acronyms The appendices are voluminous, and are therefore provided in electronic format on the CD attached to the inside front cover of the EIR notebook. Executive Summary December 2013 ES-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Executive Summary This Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) assesses the environmental impacts associated with the Chevron Tank Farm Project (Project) proposed by Chevron (Applicant) (SCH 2009031001). The Project Site is located at 276 Tank Farm Road, which is immediately south of the City of San Luis Obispo, in San Luis Obispo County, California. The Project Site is within a decommissioned oil facility originally owned by Union Oil, which reorganized as Unocal in the 1980s and was purchased by Chevron in 2005. See Figure ES-1 for the general location of the project. The City and County have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) concerning each jurisdiction’s role in this process. Pursuant to that MOU, the City and County have agreed to act as co-Lead Agencies for purposes of preparing this EIR. For purposes of ultimately certifying a Final EIR, the City will act as Lead Agency and the County will act as Responsible Agency. In the event that, in acting on any portion of the Project and considering whether to certify the Final EIR, the City declines to certify the Final EIR for any reason, the County will act as Lead Agency for purposes of acting on any portion of the Project and for certifying the Final EIR. This FEIR is an informational document that is being used by the general public and governmental agencies to review and evaluate the Project. The reader should not rely exclusively on the Executive Summary as the sole basis for judgment of the Project and its alternatives. Specifically, the EIR should be consulted for information about the environmental effects associated with the Project and potential mitigation measures to address or minimize those effects. The remainder of the Executive Summary consists of the following sections: An introduction, which discusses the Notice of Preparation (NOP) process that was used for the EIR and the public comment period for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR); A brief description of the Project; A discussion of governmental agency oversight and involvement in the development of the remediation project. A summary of key impacts and mitigation measures associated with the Project; A brief description of the alternatives evaluated throughout this EIR; A summary of the Environmentally Superior Alternative; and A discussion of areas of known controversy and uncertainty. A set of Impact Summary Tables is provided after the Executive Summary. These tables summarize the impacts and mitigation measures for the Project. The impacts and mitigation measures are discussed in further detail in Section 4.0. The alternatives to the Project are discussed in Section 5.0. Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure ES-1 Proposed Project Location Executive Summary December 2013 ES-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR A. Introduction The purpose of the Executive Summary and Impact Summary Tables is to provide the reader with a brief overview of the Project, the anticipated environmental effects, and the potential mitigation measures that could reduce the severity of the impacts associated with the Project. The reader should not, however, rely exclusively on the Executive Summary as the sole basis for judgment of the Project and its alternatives. This FEIR was prepared in accordance with State and San Luis Obispo City (City) and County County) administrative guidelines established to comply with CEQA. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines, the City and County worked together to prepare an Initial Study for the Project and solicited comments through distribution of an NOP (issued in February 27, 2009). The scoping documents and comments received in response to the NOP were used to help direct the scope of the analysis and the technical studies in this EIR. Copies of the Initial Study, NOP, and the comments received in response to the NOP can be found in Appendix I. The Draft EIR was released on June 20, 2013 for a 45-day public comment period. During the public comment period a number of public workshops were held on the Draft EIR to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions about the Draft EIR. Volume II of the FEIR contains a copy of all of the comment letters received on the Draft EIR and the responses to those comments. Volume II is provided in electronic format on the CD attached to the inside front cover of the FEIR. Revision marks are used throughout this FEIR to show where changes have been made to the DEIR. Areas where the text has been revised are shown by solid vertical lines on the left margin of the page. In addition to the City and County, a number of other governmental agencies require a CEQA analysis of the Project in order to act on the Project. These agencies include the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD), CALFire, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), and the Airport Land Use Commission. B. Proposed Project Description The Project entails a complex permitting landscape for a couple of reasons. First, although the Project Site is within the County, it is also located within the City’s Urban Reserve Line (URL) and Urban Services Line (USL) and has been identified by the City for annexation. Second, the Project is broken into two larger phases: remediation and development. The County is responsible for the remediation phase, while the development phase would be regulated by either the County or City, depending on whether or not the Project Site is annexed into the City. In addition, the Project Site is located within an area that is subject to the Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) so will need approval from the Airport Land Use Commission. The remediation and restoration component includes several activities proposed to occur over a three-year period: demolition of existing buildings and selected reservoir remnants, excavation of top soil and sub-surface material, site re-contouring, capping, and increasing the quantity of wetland and rare plant habitats. Re-contouring would be done mostly using on-site materials. The remediation portion of the Project is based on an extensive collaborative process with resource agencies that have concurred with the Applicant’s proposed remediation approach, while taking into consideration the proposed future uses at the Project Site. Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The second component of the Project would be development of portions of the Project Site. If the Project is annexed into the City, there would need to be amendments to the City Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP), the General Plan, the Airport Compatibility Open Space Plan (ACOS), a tentative Tract Map, as well as other City permits. If the development is in the County, then a General Plan amendment and conditional use permit would be required. The Applicant’s goal is to develop approximately 17 percent of the Project Site with approximately 800,000 square feet (floor area) of business park and service commercial uses. Development would be implemented in five phases over a period of approximately 25 years; each phase would create approximately 160,000 square feet of leasable floor area. The proposal includes designation of approximately 15 acres for recreational use (may include up to two acres of public land) to be developed by a subsequent Project Site/individual lot owner. The development would be essentially the same for both the City and County options. The only major difference would be that the County option would require the construction of a wastewater treatment facility on-site and use of on-site groundwater to serve the development. The Project Site is included in the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) that anticipates future annexation of this and other properties in the area given its proximity to existing City boundaries, existing industrial uses, and the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport SLOCRA). In addition, the City’s AASP encourages the environmentally sensitive portions of the Project Site – comprised of approximately 250 acres – be kept in open space. The Applicant is proposing a Development Agreement (DA) for consideration by the City Council in association with a potential annexation of the Project Site. The purpose of the DA is to ensure that development impact fees and project entitlements will remain stable throughout the phases of development. The City will use the mitigations identified in this EIR as input in the development of the DA. The mitigation measures included in the EIR will help the City identify the infrastructure improvement that may be needed for the development project. Given the uncertain nature of the DA and annexation processes, the Applicant has also filed a land division map application with the County. The objective of the dual approach by the Applicant is to provide an alternative development option in the event that the City review and approval process for annexation and development is unsuccessful. Approved development would either be under County or City jurisdiction, and such approvals would follow approval of required amendments to the County General Plan and/or the City’s AASP. The Project Site is divided into north and south sections by Tank Farm Road (see Figure ES-2). It is bordered by light commercial and industrial development to the east and west, the SLOCRA to the southeast, agricultural and pastoral lands with scattered residences to the south, and a mobile home park to the northeast. The existing buildings in the northwest part of the Project Site are used as the Applicant’s local headquarters for a variety of environmental and remediation operations. The buildings are proposed for demolition as part of the Project. Executive Summary December 2013 ES-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure ES-2 Project Site Remediation Project The remediation portion of the Project addresses soil and groundwater contamination identified as potential human health or ecological risks as agreed upon by the resources agencies participating in the Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team (SERRT) process and reviewing the proposed remedial actions for the Project Site. The Project includes restoration of wetland and rare plant habitats affected by the contamination and those that could be potentially affected by implementing the remedial actions. The petroleum-related material affecting the Project Site includes oil found in the vicinity of the former reservoirs in the subsurface at an average depth of 25 to 40 feet below ground surface (bgs), but as deep as 60 feet. At the surface, crude oil expressions range from solid asphalt-like coke to a low-density light) non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL). General remedial actions proposed by the Applicant as part of the remediation phase of the Project include excavation and off-site transport, capping, long-term monitoring, and institutional controls. Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The restoration phase as proposed by the Applicant would restore areas affected by the remediation, improve habitat value and function, improve hydrologic function and conform to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance. Impacts to waters/wetlands due to remediation efforts are expected on 42.93 acres; impacts to waters/wetlands due to development efforts are expected on 3.71 acres. The Project would include the restoration of these wetlands onsite. City Development Plan The City Development Plan proposes development of the Project Site with approximately 803,000 square feet of commercial and industrial floor area with associated parking, landscaping, open space, recreational playing fields, bicycle and pedestrian trails. The City Development Plan could also include land for the City to construct public facilities such as a transit maintenance yard and storage facility or a fire station and training facility. The development would be phased over a 25-year period. The proposed land uses under the City Development Plan include 27.85 acres of Business Park development (BP-SP), 26.01 acres of Service-Commercial development (C-S-SP), 15.05 acres of Public Facilities (PF-SP) intended for recreational ball fields, 13.62 acres of public right-of-way (e.g., streets), and the approximately 250-acre balance as Open Space (C/OS-SP). See Figure ES-3. The Applicant-proposed City Development Plan trades approximately nine acres of developable area in the northwest portion of the Project Site and on the west edge of the area south of Tank Farm Road for 16 acres in the northeast portion of the Project Site. The City would provide water, sewer, and public services such as police and fire. The City recently installed a sewer trunk line in Tank Farm Road along the property’s frontage (July 2009). The Applicant would extend the potable and recycled water mains and utilities to the developable areas. Improvements and modifications would be made to existing roadways in the Project area. Tank Farm Road would be widened to four lanes from Acacia Creek in the east to the western boundary of the property. Santa Fe Road, south of Tank Farm Road, would be re-aligned and tied into Tank Farm Road. New roads would also be constructed north of Tank Farm Road. The City Development Plan would also require amendments to the Airport Area Specific Plan AASP) and the Airport Compatibility Open Space Plan (ACOS). Some of the major changes to the AASP would include modification of some of the zoning on the Project Site, modification of the boundaries of the Cluster Development Zone, elimination of the Unocal Collector Road, elimination of the Class I multi-use trail to the south, and installation of a signalized intersection at Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road (the AASP calls for the use of a roundabout at this intersection). Amendments to the ACOS would include modification of the boundaries of the reserve spaces and the location of the reserve areas. Executive Summary December 2013 ES-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure ES-3 City Development Plan County Development Plan The County Development Plan is similar to the City Development Plan with the primary difference being that the County Development Plan proposes more rapid (Phase 1) development in the eastern end of the Project Site (south of Tank Farm Road), where approximately 1 acre of land designated as Industrial (I), would be used to construct an on-site wastewater treatment facility. The Applicant’s goal under the County Development Plan would be to develop a portion of the Project Site with an approximate 803,000 square feet (floor area) for commercial and industrial services with associated parking, landscaping, open space, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and Project Site amenities (the same amount as the City Plan). The development would be phased over 25 years. The proposed land uses under the County Development Plan include 26.56 acres of Commercial Service (CS), 27.29 acres of Industrial, Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR and Recreation (REC) consisting of 249.84 acres of open space and 15.05 acres as active sports fields, and 13.63 acres of public right-of-way (e.g., streets). See Figure ES-4. The Applicant-proposed County Development Plan proposes transferring the development potential of the Industrial zoned land identified in the County General Plan (north of the Northwest Operations Area) to the northeastern portion of the Project Site. The County would provide public services such as police and fire. Water for the development would be provided by on-site groundwater wells. A wastewater treatment plant would be built on the site to handle the sewer needs of the Project. Improvements and modifications would be made to existing roadways in the Project area. Tank Farm Road would be widened to four lanes from Acacia Creek in the east to the western boundary of the property. Santa Fe Road, south of Tank Farm Road, would be re-aligned and tied into Tank Farm Road. New roads would also be constructed north of Tank Farm Road. Figure ES-4 County Development Plan Executive Summary December 2013 ES-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Applicant proposes amending the Land Use Element of the County General Plan, including the San Luis Obispo Area Plan, to designate approximately 27 acres to Commercial Services, approximately 26 acres to Industrial, 265 acres for Open Space, and to allow for the remaining 14 acres to be used for streets. C. Agency Oversight and Involvement A large number of governmental agencies have been involved in oversite and development of the remediation project at the Tank Farm site. The Applicant’s characterization of the contamination has included, in addition to their identification and delineation, an evaluation of their importance relative to human and ecological health and the need for their remediation. In order to validate the characterization process, the Applicant entered into two cooperative programs resulting in regulatory agency participation and third-party expert review: the Remediation Technology Panel (RTP) and the SERRT. The first of these collaborative processes, the RTP, was established through a cooperative agreement between the Applicant and the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board RWQCB). The RTP consisted of three experts drawn from academia with expertise in the characterization and remediation of petroleum-affected sites, whose purview focused on soil- and groundwater-related issues. They identified data gaps within the existing site characterization, guided and reviewed subsequent characterization activities, and published a report summarizing their consensus understanding of subsurface issues at the Project Site (RTP 2006). A key finding of that report was that petroleum in the subsurface was effectively immobile and that the migration of dissolved-phase constituents was controlled by natural biodegradation processes. This finding, which was supported by a specific evaluation of natural attenuation processes, formed the basis of evaluating MNA as an appropriate remedial technology for impacted groundwater. The second of the cooperative efforts, the SERRT, was established in 2002 at the suggestion of staff at the RWQCB. This action was suggested in recognition of findings of studies which detailed the extent of sensitive resources on the Project Site, and the subsequent desire to consider a risk-based remediation program for the property. As part of the SERRT process the Applicant, regulatory agencies, and local municipalities have reviewed data, evaluated assessments, identified data gaps, established the risk associated with a given contamination source, and determined the extent of the remediation required for the Project Site. The SERRT formed two subgroups, the Human Health Risk Working Group (HHRWG) and the Ecological Risk Working Group (ERWG). Both groups included the Applicant, its representatives and consultants, and the RWQCB. In addition, the HHRWG included representatives from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Division, and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). The ERWG in addition included representatives from the City, the County Planning Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition to preparing reports documenting the human health risk assessment (HHRA) and predictive ecological risk assessment (pERA), the SERRT prepared a consensus summary document listing its recommendations for risk management at the Project Site, the Risk Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Management Summary (BBL 2005). In order to focus risk assessment efforts, certain areas of the Project Site, mainly those affected by liquid or plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions, were excluded from the risk assessments on the understanding that remediation of those areas was a must”, and the Applicant would undertake remediation there without the need for further detailed characterization or assessment. The culmination of the Applicant’s characterization efforts was the Risk Management Summary, which identified the contamination at the Project Site requires remediation. The SERRT ratified the Risk Management Summary on December 12, 2005. The Risk Management Summary also provided recommendations on treatment strategies based on levels and types of contamination, the potential ecological risks, and the potential impacts of clean-up. Contamination requiring remediation included surface liquid hydrocarbons impacting seasonal wetlands in Reservoirs 5 and 7, plastic surface hydrocarbons found across the Project Site (mostly in low-lying areas), groundwater affected by LNAPL and benzene, arsenic in soil, asphalt affecting wetlands, and the potential for vapor intrusion to affect buildings. Based upon the Risk Management Summary, a Feasibility Study (FS) was conducted that considered remedial activities that supported development consistent with the land use plans available at that time. The FS evaluated various remedial alternatives that addressed site contamination issues and selected a preferred remedy. The study was ratified by the SERRT on March 15, 2007. D. Proposed Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures In the Impact Summary Tables and throughout this EIR, impacts of the Project and alternatives have been classified using the categories Class I, II, III, and IV as described below. Class I – Significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels, Class II – Significant impacts that can be mitigated to less than significant levels, Class III – Less than significant impacts without mitigation, and Class IV – Beneficial impacts. The term “significance” is used in these tables and throughout this EIR to characterize the magnitude of the projected impact. For the purposes of this EIR, a significant impact is a substantial, or potentially substantial, change to resources in the local Project area or the area adjacent to the Project in comparison to the thresholds of significance established for the resource or issue area. These thresholds of significance are discussed by issue area in Section 4.0. The impacts along with the identified mitigation measures for each impact are shown in the Impact Summary Tables, immediately following this Executive Summary. Each issue area section of the Impact Summary Tables describes and classifies each impact, lists recommended mitigation, and states the level of impact with mitigation. The remainder of this section presents a brief summary of the key impacts and mitigation measures for each issue area. The reader should refer to the Impact Summary Tables and Section 4.0 of the EIR for a more detailed discussion of the impacts and associated mitigation measures. Executive Summary December 2013 ES-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Air Quality There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) air quality impacts from the remediation component of the Project. Construction and operational activities associated with the remediation component of the Project could result in air toxic, fugitive dust, diesel PM and ROG + NOx emissions, which were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Some of the mitigation measures identified for these impacts include use of CARB Tier 3 certified diesel construction equipment and securing off-site reductions in ROG + NOx emissions if thresholds are exceeded. Significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts from fugitive dust and diesel PM emissions could occur during the development components of the Project. This is primarily due to vehicle emissions associated with the development. Mitigation measures addressing alternative transportation modes such as transit, and bicycle would serve to reduce these emissions, but they would still remain significant and unavoidable. Construction and operational activities associated with the development component of the Project could result in Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and ROG + NOx emissions, which were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Some of the mitigation measures identified for these impacts include implementing a Transportation Demand Management program for employees and securing off-site reductions in GHG and ROG + NOx emissions if thresholds are exceeded. Biological Resources There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to biological resources from the remediation or development component of the Project. Impacts to Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (VPFS) could occur during remediation activities. Specimens of the federally threatened VPFS could be destroyed during soil remediation with natural and artificial wetlands. Impacts to VPFS were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Mitigation measures covering repopulation and collection of cysts following U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) protocols would reduce this impact to less than significant levels. Construction and operational activities associated with the remediation component of the Project could result in impacts to habitat for listed and special status species, loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands and habitat for rare plants and animals, adversely affected federal wetlands, habitat alteration, temporary migration impediments, and the reduction in size and diversity of plant and animal populations. These impacts were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Some of the mitigation measures identified for these impacts include implementing a Final Restoration Plan, conducting updated surveys of sensitive species habitats, employing an independent biological monitor, delineating sensitive species habitat with specific labeling, and minimizing project-related nighttime traffic. Construction and operational activities associated with the development component of the Project could result in loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands and habitat for rare plants and animals, temporary migration impediments, and the reduction in size and diversity of plant and animal populations. These impacts were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Some of the mitigation measures identified for these impacts include implementing a Final Restoration Plan, monitoring the function of the restored native grassland Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR habitat, excluding hikers, pets and cyclists from sensitive habitats, shielding light spillage into adjacent preserved open space areas, and preparing a WWTF spill/discharge plan (County scenario) with measures to prevent untreated discharge or accidental releases. During both phases of the Project, the Applicant would be required to obtain all applicable federal and state permits and agreements, including a USFWS Incidental Take Statement and Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and a streambed alteration permit from California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Transportation and Circulation There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to transportation and circulation from the remediation component of the Project. Significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts from cumulative traffic conditions could occur during the Development Project. Five intersections and two freeway segments would be impacted. Even with requirements for improvements designed to address congestion issues, these impacts cannot be fully mitigated. Construction and operational activities associated with the remediation component of the Project could result in roadway impacts due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles creating an unsafe situation. These impacts were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). A mitigation measure designed to address these impacts includes the implementation of a Construction Traffic Management Plan that identifies haul routes, a traffic control plan, and a scheduling plan. Construction and operational activities associated with the development component of the Project could result in one intersection operating at unacceptable levels, increased transit ridership, bicycle and pedestrian network impacts, and site access issues. These impacts were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Some of the mitigation measures identified for these impacts include implementing previously scheduled improvements, installing a multi-lane roundabout at the new intersection at Tank Farm Road and northern leg of Santa Fe Road, installing a bus stop at the east and west end of the Project along Tank Farm Road, installing a continuous Class I multi-use path along the north side of Tank Farm Road, and implementing a Construction Traffic Management Plan. Water Resources There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to water resources from the remediation or development component of the Project. Implementation of the County Development Plan could result in the migration of hydrocarbons from the shallow ground water to the deep groundwater wells, which was found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). The mitigation measure for this impact includes the implementation of a sentinel monitoring program that would include wells positioned and constructed to specifically monitor inflowing water in the vicinity of the groundwater wells that would provide information on any approaching petroleum-related constituents of concern. If petroleum-related constituents of concern are detected, then a groundwater treatment system would need to be installed that uses carbon canisters, or similar technology, to remove any hydrocarbons. Executive Summary December 2013 ES-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impacts to water resources during the remediation component of the Project that are less than significant with mitigation (Class II) include surface water quality degradation, stormwater mobilization of contaminant constituents, and increased storm runoff flowing onto erodible soils. Mitigation measures for these impacts include directing and controlling pollutant runoff, implementing Surface Water Quality Management Practices, treating contaminated soil, and preparing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Wastewater There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to wastewater from the remediation component of the Project, or from the City Development Plan component of the Project An impact to wastewater during the County’s Development Plan that is significant and unavoidable (Class I) includes discharges from the WWTF increasing surface water flow rates and affecting downstream properties. The mitigation measure for this impact includes implementing a Wastewater Discharge Plan for the WWTF. Even with the implementation of this measure, the impact would still be significant. There are no less than significant with mitigation (Class II) impacts to wastewater from the remediation component of the Project. An impact to wastewater during the County’s Development Plan that is less than significant with mitigation (Class II) includes the WWTF discharges increasing pollutants into the existing drainages. The mitigation measure for this impact includes approval of a tertiary treatment system and implementing a quarterly monitoring program that provides for sampling and testing for all required constituent compounds. Geological and Soil Resources There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to geological and soil resources associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. An impact to geological and soil resources during the remediation component of the Project that is less than significant with mitigation (Class II) includes erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground disturbing activities. Mitigation measures for this impact include preparation of a SWPPP, an Erosion Control Plan, and a Wet Weather Plan. Impacts to geological resources during the development component of the Project that are less than significant with mitigation (Class II) include erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways, loss of property, and risk to human life due to seismically-induced ground shaking, hydroconsolidation, excessive settlement and expansive soils. Mitigation measures for these impacts include compliance with all applicable codes and regulations, conduct of a detailed geotechnical evaluation, assurance of proper compaction of unconsolidated soils, and implementation of structural measures to assure adequate equipment support as well as design requirements for pad development/construction. Noise and Vibration There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to noise and vibration associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. Impacts to noise and vibration during the remediation component of the Project that are less than significant with mitigation (Class II) include increased noise and vibration levels due to Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR construction machinery and operational activities, such as rock blasting. Mitigation measures for these impacts include implementing crushing plant setbacks from residential receptors, limiting construction hours, and developing and implementing a Blasting Plan. Impacts to noise and vibration during the development component of the Project that are less than significant with mitigation (Class II) include increased noise levels due to construction machinery and operational activities and exposure to the development by airport activities. Mitigation measures for these impacts include implementing crushing plant setbacks from residential receptors, limiting construction hours, and incorporating noise attenuation design features in facilities within the Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) noise contours. Cultural Resources and Archaeology There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to cultural resources associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. Impacts to cultural resources during the remediation and development components of the Project that are less than significant with mitigation (Class II) include historical resources impacts, and unanticipated disturbance to human remains and paleontological resources due to remediation activities. Mitigation measures for these impacts include developing a monitoring plan and halting area activities for expert assessment when resources are discovered. Aesthetics and Visual Resources There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to aesthetics and visual resources associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. Less than significant with mitigation (Class II) impacts to aesthetics and visual resources could occur during the development component of the Project due to degradation of the site’s existing visual character and introduction of new sources of light and glare. Mitigation measures identified for these impacts include conducting an ALUP consistency review for new construction as well as consistency reviews for the AASP and Community Design Guidelines. Other measures include implementing a lighting plan and lighting operation schedule, minimizing glare, and prohibiting laser light demonstrations. With these measures the impacts would be less than significant. An impact to aesthetics and visual resources during the remediation component of the Project that is less than significant with mitigation (Class II) includes degradation to the visual character or quality of the Project Site and surrounding viewshed. The mitigation measure for this impact includes ensuring that graded areas not built on within two years of Project initiation are temporarily landscaped or otherwise maintained to cover exposed soils and maintain growth of weeds. The development component of the Project was found to have less than significant (Class II) impacts related to conflicts with the City’s AASP and the County’s ALUP. Mitigation measures for these impacts include implementing the mitigation measures previously discussed for visual character as well as for the County, prohibiting uses that regularly produce visually significant quantities of smoke. Hazards and Hazardous Materials A significant and unavoidable (Class I) impact to hazards and hazardous materials could occur during the remediation component of the Project due to wetland restoration that could result in Executive Summary December 2013 ES-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR an increased risk of aircraft bird strikes. As a result, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. The Applicant has proposed replacing wetland areas impacted by the remediation component of the Project at a 1.7 to 1 ratio. The biological resources section of the EIR has a mitigation measure that would require offsetting the remediation component of the Project impacts to wetlands at a ratio of 1 to 1 for disturbed wetlands and 2 to 1 for wetland that are permanently lost due to the development. These wetland areas would all be located within the airport runway safety zones. Even at a 1 to 1 replacement ratio, the restoration activities would improve the value and functions of the wetlands, which could make them more attractive to birds. In addition, with the re-establishment of normal water flow throughout the site, other additional degraded wetlands could recover and provide additional habitat functions. The natural recovery of degraded wetlands, combined with mitigation measures, particularly restoration of on-site, existing wetlands, would result in a potential increase in the quantity and quality of wetland habitat and therefore possibly increase bird populations. Therefore, the impact associated with bird strike risk has remained significant and unavoidable (Class I). An impact to hazards and hazardous materials during the remediation component of the Project that is less than significant with mitigation (Class II) includes increased asbestos exposure risk. The mitigation measure for this impact includes implementing measures from the air quality issue area. As part of the remediation component of the Project, the Applicant proposes to make some modification to Reservoir 2 to improve airport safety by addressing concerns raised by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The main runway alignment intersects the reservoir, which is now a significant feature within the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). The ALUC identified this feature as a safety concern if an aircraft had to make an emergency landing within the RPZ. These modifications were found to be a beneficial impact (Class IV). There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to hazards and hazardous materials associated with the development components of the Project. Impacts to hazards and hazardous materials during the development component of the Project that are less than significant with mitigation (Class II) include potential health risks from exposure to residual contamination and the potential risks associated with the future use of acutely hazardous materials (AHMs). The mitigation measures for these impacts include securing deed restrictions specifying trenching limits and limits of on-site storage of AHMs. For the County Development Plan, risks associated with the WWTF chemical usage, and with the WWTF polishing ponds and aircraft bird strikes are less than significant with mitigation Class II). The mitigation measures for these impacts include limits of on-site storage of chlorine and sulfur dioxide, and prohibition of the use of polishing ponds for the WWTF. Population and Housing There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts or less than significant with mitigation (Class II) impacts to population and housing associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. However, an impact to population and housing that is less than significant (Class III) includes the project inducing substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. No mitigation measures are required for this impact. Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Public Services and Utilities There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to public services and utilities associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. For the City Development Plan, impacts to demand for fire protection services were found to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II) since the response times for the City Fire Department are longer than the standards adopted in the City Fire Department Master Plan. Mitigation measures include the Applicant deeding property at the Project Site to the City that could be used for a future City fire station, and a requirement that the City deem that adequate fire suppression services and facilities, consistent with adopted travel time standards, are available, or will be made available concurrent with development at the Project Site. If, at time of development it is determined that the development site is outside of adequate response time zones, the Developer/Applicant could finance improvements that would alleviate the deficiencies. Under the County Development Plan fire protection services were found to be less than significant (Class III) since the CALFIRE response times to the Project Site are adequate, and the Applicant is required to pay the County’s fire service mitigation fee. Recreation There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts or less than significant with mitigation (Class II) impacts to recreation associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. However, an impact to recreation that is less than significant (Class III) includes the potential effect remediation activities could have on existing recreational facilities and users. No mitigation measures are required for this impact. The development component of the Project would include the addition of ballfields and bicycle paths, which would be a beneficial impact (Class IV). Agricultural Resources There are no significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts to agricultural resources associated with the remediation or development components of the Project. The Project could result in less than significant with mitigation (Class II) impacts to productivity of adjacent farmlands due to construction activities during both the remediation and development portions of the Project. Dust generated by the demolition of the existing buildings and structures in the Northwest Operations Area, pipeline decommissioning activities, remediation activities, and development construction activities could produce a significant short-term impact and temporarily affect the productivity of row crops. Implementation of the fugitive dust mitigation measures identified in air quality would reduce these impacts to less than significant. E. Description of Project Alternatives Alternatives to the Project have been developed per CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6. This document has used an alternative screening analysis to select the alternatives evaluated in detail in the EIR. The screening analysis provides the detailed explanation of why some of the alternatives were rejected for further analysis and ensures that only potentially environmentally preferred alternatives are evaluated and compared in the EIR. Please see Chapter 5 of the EIR for a detailed discussion of the screened alternatives. The following are the alternatives that were selected as part of the screening analysis for more detailed review. Executive Summary December 2013 ES-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR No Project Alternative With the No Project Alternative, development of the Project Site would not occur, and the Project Site would remain as open space. However, it is likely that the RWQCB and/or CDFW would still require some level of remediation of the site, even with no development, to assure protection of human health and ecological receptors. For the purposes of the EIR, it has been assumed that the remediation and restoration of the Project Site under the No Project Alternative would be similar to the proposed Project. The major change would be that the remediation portion of the Project would not include the construction of the rough pads for the proposed development. Instead, the areas that are proposed for development would be returned to their natural grade and revegetated. None of the proposed infrastructure improvements associated with roads would occur as part of the No Project Alternative. Only the storm water management improvements needed to support the remediation and restoration effort would be constructed on-site. The reader is referred to Section 2.3 of the EIR for a detailed description of the remediation and restoration activities that would occur under the No Project Alternative. Replace Remedial Caps with Excavation This alternative is similar to the proposed Project, except areas designated for remedial capping would be excavated and then backfilled. In addition, soil with elevated arsenic concentrations will be removed and transported off-site for disposal. This alternative would result in the removal from the site of a larger amount of the constituents that were identified in the Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) and Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA), as being a potential threat to human health and site ecology (mainly crude oil, lead, arsenic, PCBs, and benzene), than the proposed Project. This alternative assumes that most of the excavated material would be trucked to the Santa Maria Landfill for use in the closure of landfill cells as part of the Landfill’s Non-Hazardous Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil (NHIS) program. It is possible that some of the excavated material, particularly arsenic-impacted soils, would not meet the acceptance criteria for that program and would need to be transported to another disposal facility, such as Buttonwillow in Kern County or Kettleman Hills in Fresno County, if it did not meet the NHIS criteria for the Santa Maria Landfill. Reduced Development The reduced development alternative would have approximately 562,000 square feet of commercial and industrial floor area with associated parking, landscaping, open space, recreational playing fields, bicycle and pedestrian trails. This represents a 30 percent reduction in building floor space over the proposed Project. Under this alternative, no development would occur on the western portion of the site just north of Tank Farm Road. Known as the Northwest Operations Area, this portion of the Project Site contains the highest level of contamination. The Northwest Operations Area would be recontoured to a natural grade and then revegetated. All other remediation restoration activities associated with the proposed Project would remain the same under this alternative. This alternative would apply to both the City and County Development Plans. Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR F. Environmentally Superior Alternative This section summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each of the alternatives as compared to the Project. A more detailed comparison of the Project and the alternatives can be found in Section 5.4 of the EIR. This comparative analysis was used to select the environmentally superior alternative as required by CEQA, which states that “if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(2)). Remediation Alternatives No Project Alternative There is very little difference in the environmental impacts of remediation under the No Project Alternative and the proposed Project. Remediation under the No Project Alternative would not eliminate or change the significance (i.e., impact classification) of any of the environmental impacts of the proposed remediation component of the Project. Remediation under the No Project Alternative would reduce the severity of all of the air emission impacts. Impacts in the other issue areas would remain essentially the same as for the proposed remediation component of the Project. Given that remediation under the No Project Alternative would reduce the severity of a number of air quality impacts, it was found to be the environmentally superior alternative. However, if the Project Site was remediated under the No Project Alternative, it would have to remain as open space and no development could occur. As such, remediation under the No Project Alternative would not meet any of the development objectives of the Project. CEQA requires that if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, then the next most environmentally preferred alternative must also be identified. Replace Remedial Caps with Excavation This alternative would not eliminate or reduce the severity of any of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed remediation component of the Project. The severity of a number of impacts identified for the proposed remediation component of the Project would increase with this alternative (air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology, transportation, noise, etc.). This alternative would result in the removal of more of the hydrocarbon impacted material from the site than the proposed Project. However, the level of human health and ecological risk would remain essentially the same as for the proposed Project. The main reason for this is that with the proposed Project the former reservoirs would be capped with clean soil/gravel, and vapor barriers would be installed. These remedial methods would provide essentially the same levels of protection and risk reduction as excavation based upon the type of contamination present at the Project Site (mainly lead, arsenic, PCBs, and benzene). The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would provide no reduction in the severity of any of the impacts identified for the proposed remediation component of the Project. Therefore, the proposed remediation component of the Project was found, in comparison to the No Project Alternative, to be the next environmentally superior alternative. Executive Summary December 2013 ES-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Development Alternatives No Project Alternative The portion of the No Project Alternative covering development would eliminate all of the development impacts of the proposed Project, since no development would occur. Although it would also eliminate the beneficial impacts to recreation since the ball fields and bike paths would not be built, the development portion of the No Project Alternative remains the clear environmentally superior alternative. The No Project Alternative would not meet any of the development objectives of the Project. CEQA requires that if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, then the next most environmentally preferred alternative must also be identified. Reduced Development Alternative The reduced development alternative would reduce the impact classification associated with diesel particulate emissions from significant and unavoidable (Class I) to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Fugitive dust emissions would remain Class I, but would be reduced in severity. Traffic impacts to five intersections and two freeway segments under the cumulative conditions would be reduced in severity, but would remain a Class I impact for this alternative. It should be noted that the traffic impact of the Project under the existing conditions (i.e., the baseline) would be less than significant (Class II) for this alternative . For the County development option, this alternative would also reduce the severity of one significant and unavoidable (Class I) impacts (discharges from the wastewater treatment plant increasing surface water flows during storm events). However, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I) for the reduced development alternative. The reduced development alternative would meet all but one of the objectives of the proposed Project. The Applicant has stated that any reduction in building square footage would not meet objective #5 that states, “develop an economically viable commercial project with infrastructure and development phased over 25 years”. The Applicant’s position has been that all of the building square footage would be needed to allow for the development of the public infrastructure that would be required for the proposed Project, and that any reduction in the building square footage would make the Project uneconomical. The EIR does not address the issue of economic feasibility. With the reduced development alternative the proposed building square footage would be less than what was envisioned in the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) and would be well below the allowable building and population densities allowed under the Airport Area Specific Plan. From an environmental standpoint, the reduced development alternative would eliminate one significant and unavoidable (Class I) Project impact (the portion of AQ.7 covering diesel particulate emissions) and reduce the severity of the remaining significant and unavoidable portion of AQ.7 covering fugitive dust emissions. The alternative would also reduce the severity of the significant and unavoidable (Class I) cumulative traffic impact (T.5-Traffic Impacts to Five Intersections and Two Freeway Segments under the Cumulative Conditions). However, the traffic and fugitive dust impacts would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I) for this alternative. Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Given that the reduced development alternative would eliminate the Class I impact associated with diesel particulate emissions (first part of AQ.7) and would reduce the severity of two other Class I impacts (the second part of AQ.7 covering fugitive dust emissions and T.5 covering cumulative traffic impacts), it was found, in comparison to the No Project Alternative, to be the next environmentally superior alternative. G. Known Areas of Controversy and Uncertainty According to Section 15123 of the CEQA Guidelines, the EIR shall identify “areas of controversy known to the Lead Agency including issues raised by agencies and the public.” There are two key issues of controversy that have been raised with regard to the Project. Level of Cleanup of Contamination at the Project Site A number of stakeholders have raised the issue that the Applicant should do more to remediate the Project Site by removing more of the existing contamination. Stakeholders have wanted to see increased excavations that would remove more of the contamination. In determining the level of remediation that would need to occur at the Project Site, a Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team (SERRT) was formed. The SERRT formed two subgroups, the Human Health Risk Working Group (HHRWG) and the Ecological Risk Working Group (ERWG). Both groups included the Applicant, its representatives and consultants, and the RWQCB. In addition, the HHRWG included representatives from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Division, and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). The ERWG in addition included representatives from the City, the County Planning Department, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the USFWS, and the USACOE. As part of the SERRT process a Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) and a Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA) were developed for the Project Site. The HHRA evaluated potential human health risks at the Project Site using current U.S. EPA and CalEPA methodologies. Risks determined in the HHRA are driven primarily by the presence of arsenic and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil. The HHRA evaluated the potential cancer risk and noncancer hazard to future site users identified in the City and County Development Plans from chemicals known to be present in soil, soil gas, surface water and groundwater at the Project Site. As discussed in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials Section of the EIR (Section 4.11) these risks were found to be less than significant with the implementation of the proposed remediation. In addition, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment OEHHA) and the County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Services have both submitted letters explicitly stating that the revised HHRA is adequate. These letters are included in Appendix H.2 of the EIR. The pERA was used to look at impacts of the contamination on terrestrial plants and wildlife. In general terms, terrestrial/wetland plants and terrestrial/sediment invertebrates are the most sensitive receptors evaluated in the pERA, especially in terms of risk due to petroleum exposure. The main potential risks to wildlife identified in the pERA are from exposure to lead and to a lesser extent arsenic. With the implementation of the remediation component of the Project, which would involve mainly excavations and remedial caps, the impacts to biological resources Executive Summary December 2013 ES-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR were found to be less than significant. Discussion on the pERA can be found in Section 4.2 Biological Resources) and Section 4.11 (Hazards and Hazardous Materials). The culmination of the Applicant’s characterization and risk assessment efforts was the Risk Management Summary, which identified contamination at the Project Site requiring remediation as agreed by the SERRT. The Risk Management Summary provided recommendations on treatment strategies based on levels and types of contamination, the potential ecological risks, and the potential impacts of clean-up. The result of the SERRT process was the development of the Remedial Action Plan (RAP). The Remedial Action Plan (RAP) provides regulatory agencies, the municipalities with jurisdiction over the site, and the public with detailed information on how the Applicant will implement the remedial actions agreed to by the SERRT. The remediation component of the Project was developed using a human health and ecological risk based approach, and would include a combination of excavations, remedial caps, institutional controls and long-term monitoring developed as part of the SERRT process. The remediation approach was developed to reduce the levels of risk without the significant ecological impacts associated with a large excavation project. The goal of the remediation that would occur in sensitive habitat areas would be to minimize environmental impacts to the extent feasible, while assuring that after remediation, the Project Site is protective of human health and the ecology. As part of the EIR, a number of remediation alternatives were developed that would involve increased levels of excavation at the Project Site. See Chapter 5 (Alternatives Analysis) for a discussion of these excavation alternatives. Long-Term Use of the Open Space Some stakeholders have raised the issue of allowing increased public access and recreational development on the large amount of open space that would be created by the development of the Project Site. The proposed development would include up to 15 acres for recreational fields and a number of bike paths. Opening up more of the open space to public access raises a number of issues including: The open space areas contain sensitive biological resources including, wetlands and vernal pool fairy shrimp (VPFS), which is a federally listed species. These sensitive biological resources could be impacted if the open space were open to public access. Protecting these sensitive biological areas is a key goal of the resource agencies. The locations of these sensitive biological areas are provided in Section 4.2 (Biological Resources). The open space is within the runway protection zone of the SLOCRA, and areas of the site are used for airport equipment. Public access to these open space areas could conflict with airport operations and represent a hazard to the public and airport operations. All of the open space would be part of the Reserve Space that is required by the Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) to allow for increased development within the Cluster Development Zone CDZ) of the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP). In addition, some of the open space would have to be set aside as Reserve Areas, per the ALUP. The ALUP limits the types of Executive Summary Chevron Tank Farm ES-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR development and activities that can occur with Reserve Areas and Reserve Space. Information on the Reserve Areas and Reserve Spaces is provided in Chapter 2 of the EIR. At the time of preparation of the EIR, it was unclear what the Applicant was proposing to do with the portion of the Project Site that would not be developed. The EIR has a mitigation measure that would require the Applicant to place the undeveloped land in a conservation easement that would be managed by a municipality or non-governmental organization. The Relationship of the Proposed Project to the Prado Road Extension The extension of Prado Road is a major transportation goal of the City. Completion of this road is critical to the development of the Margarita Area, and is part of the Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP). Prado Road would provide the primary access to the Margarita Area from other parts of the City and would connect the southeastern and southwestern parts of the City (MASP, 2004). The City Circulation Element designates Prado Road as a “highway/regional route.” The Project is part of the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) and does not include any parts of the Prado Road extension, which is designed to support the Margarita Area. All road improvements associated with the Project would occur in the vicinity of the Project Site and would serve to improve the Tank Farm Road corridor. The EIR did look at an alternative that would have included completing the Prado Road extension; however this alternative was subsequently removed from further consideration (see Chapter 5 [Alternatives Analysis]). Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact Summary Tables Remediation Project Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm i December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Page Class I Impacts ..................................................................................................................................................... IST-1-1 Class II Impacts.................................................................................................................................................... IST-1-2 Class III Impacts ................................................................................................................................................ IST-1-36 Class IV Impacts ................................................................................................................................................ IST-1-41 Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-1 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.4 Increased aircraft wildlife strike risk due to wetland restoration within the airport Runway Protection Zone and Safety Areas. Remediation HM-4 The applicant shall limit the on-site wetland replacement to a ratio of 1:1 for a total on-site wetland restoration of 46.64 acres (42.93 acres for remediation and 3.71 acres for development area). Significant and unavoidable Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.1 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate ROG NOx and Diesel PM emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Remediation AQ-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, and throughout project construction, as applicable, the Applicant shall implement the following construction emission reduction measures: a. Properly maintain all construction equipment according to manufacturer’s specifications; b. Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment with CARB-certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road); c. Use CARB Tier 3 certified diesel construction equipment or cleaner off-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with state Off-Road Regulations; d. Use CARB 2007 or cleaner certified on-road heavy-duty diesel trucks and comply with state On-Road Regulations; e. If construction or trucking companies that are awarded the bid or are subcontractors for the project do not have equipment to meet the above two measures, the impacts from the dirtier equipment shall be addressed through SLOAPCD approved off-site or other mitigation measures; f. All on- and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5 minute idling limit; g. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies. (Sensitive receptors are defined in the SLOAPCD Handbook as people that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include schools, parks and playgrounds, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential dwelling units); h. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies; No Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-3 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; i. Equipment shall be electrified when feasible; j. Substitute gasoline-powered or diesel hybrids in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible; and k. Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane, or biodiesel. AQ-1b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure SLOAPCD regulations that prohibit developmental burning of vegetative material within San Luis Obispo County are followed. AQ-1c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that portable equipment and engines 50 horsepower or greater, used during grading and construction activities must have a California portable equipment registration issued by the ARB) or an SLOAPCD permit. Proof of registration must be provided to the SLOAPCD prior to the start of grading or construction or a permit secured from the SLOAPCD prior to the start of grading or construction. The following list is as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements, but it is not exclusive: a. Power screens, conveyors, diesel engines, and/or crushers; b. Portable generators and equipment with 50-horsepower or greater engines; c. Internal combustion engines; d. Unconfined abrasive blasting operations; e. Concrete batch plants; f. Rock and pavement crushing; g. Tub grinders; and Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact h. Trommel screens. AQ-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain the required SLOAPCD permits for the hydrocarbon contaminated soil. In addition, the following measures shall be implemented unless otherwise directed by the SLOAPCD upon a finding that alternative measures will result in equal or greater reduction in emission of air contaminants. a. Covers on storage piles shall be maintained in place at all times in areas not actively involved in soil addition or removal; b. Contaminated soil shall be covered with at least six inches of packed uncontaminated soil or other TPH –non-permeable barrier such as plastic tarp or other methods as approved by the SLOCAPCD. No headspace shall be allowed where vapors could accumulate; c. Covered piles shall be designed in such a way to eliminate erosion due to wind or water. No openings in the covers are permitted; d. The air quality impacts from the excavation and haul trips associated with removing the contaminated soil must be evaluated, with emissions estimates provided to the SLOAPCD and mitigated with low emission trucks, low emission construction equipment and/or offsets if needed, if total emissions exceed the SLOAPCD’s construction phase thresholds. An estimate of these emissions is included in this EIR; e. During soil excavation, odors shall not be evident to such a degree as to cause a public nuisance, or violation of SLOAPCD regulations would result; f. Clean soil must be segregated from contaminated soil; and g. The permit shall specify applicable criteria established by SLOAPCD. The notification and permitting determination requirements shall be directed to the SLOAPCD Engineering Division. AQ-1e Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, or during construction, if emissions Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-5 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact of ROG+NOx with the above mitigations still exceed the thresholds, the Applicant shall secure SLOAPCD-approved off-site reductions in ROG + NOx emissions to ensure that ROG + NOx emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD quarterly thresholds. Coordination with the SLOAPCD should begin at least six (6) months prior to issuance of grading permits for the Project to allow time for refining calculations and for the SLOAPCD to review and approve the CAMP and off-site mitigation approach. AQ-1f Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that all grading and construction equipment greater than 100 bhp be equipped with CARB Level 3 diesel particulate filters (DPF), or equivalent, to achieve an 85 percent reduction in diesel particulate emissions. If CARB verified Level 3 DPFs cannot be secured for all of the equipment greater than 100 hp then the applicant will work to offset the added DPM with measures including but not limited to schedule modifications, implementation of no idling requirement, and expanded implementation of AQ-1a measures "i", "j", and "k"(e.g. use of alternative fueled generators). AQ-1g Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall produce a schedule detailing the phasing of activities for each OU and ensuring that the emissions of diesel particulate in any quarter falls below the applicable SLOAPCD thresholds. This could include measures such as ensuring that Reservoir 5 Cap, Reservoir 7 Cap and North Marsh remediation do not coincide. As an alternative approach, if scheduling is not feasible, the Applicant shall provide SLOAPCD- approved off-site reductions in DPM emissions to ensure that DPM emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds. AQ.2 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate Remediation AQ-2a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall provide satisfactory evidence that a SLOAPCD-approved Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) has been prepared that addresses fugitive dust emissions. The Plan shall include requirements in the SLOAPCD CEQA Handbook. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact fugitive dust that exceeds SLOAPCD thresholds. Fugitive dust mitigation measures in the plan shall include a combination of the following, as approved by the SLOAPCD: a. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. b. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. An adequate water supply source must be identified. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. c. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed, covered, or a SLOAPCD-approved alternative method will be used. (90 percent reduction). d. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved Project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. e. Exposed ground areas that will be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast-germinating non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established, unless other dust and erosion control measures are specified in the agency-approved Dust Control Plan. f. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD. g. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. h. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. i. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-7 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact j. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible l. Apply water every 3 hours to disturbed areas within the construction site (61 percent reduction in particulate emissions). m. Application of soil binders to dirt roads shall be applied to achieve at least an 80 percent reduction in fugitive dust emissions. All soil binders used shall be environmentally friendly’ and shall be either lignosulfonate- or calcium lignosulfonate-based approved by the SLOAPCD. All dust control methods, including soil binders and gravel, shall be demonstrated in the fugitive dust control plan to ensure compliance with SLOAPCD Rule 401. n. All roadway, driveway, and sidewalk paving should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. o. The contractor or builder shall designate a person to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and oversee mitigation measure implementation as per SLOAPCD approval to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions to less than 20 percent opacity, and to prevent transport of dust off-site. The designated monitor shall carry out these duties on regular workdays, as well as holidays and weekends when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of the designated monitor shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or demolition. AQ-2b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit an APCD approved Construction Activity Monitoring Plan (CAMP), which shall include, but not be limited to the following elements: a. A Dust Control Management Plan that encompasses all, but is not limited to, Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact measures associated with impact AQ.1 and AQ.2; b. Tabulation of on- and off-road construction equipment information (e.g., make, model, type, engine tier, DPM Level 3 filter age, horse-power, and miles or hours of operation); c. Construction truck trips scheduled during non-peak hours to reduce peak-hour emissions; d. Limited construction work-day period, if necessary; and e. Phase construction activities, if appropriate. AQ-2c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle-restricting measures for both on- and off-road equipment during the Project grading and construction phase near sensitive receptors: a. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies. No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; b. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies. No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; c. Use alternative fueled equipment whenever possible; and d. Signs identifying the no idling requirements must be posted and enforced at the construction site. AQ-2d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle-restricting measures for on-road vehicles during the grading and construction phase of the Project: a. Section 2485 of Title 13, the California Code of Regulations limits diesel- fueled commercial motor vehicles that operate in the State of California with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds and licensed for Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-9 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact operation on highways. It applies to California and non-California based vehicles. In general, the regulation specifies that drivers of these vehicles: Shall not idle the vehicle’s primary diesel engine for more than 5 minutes at any location, except as noted in Subsection (d) of the regulation; and, Shall not operate a diesel-fueled auxiliary power system (APS) to power a heater, air conditioner, or any ancillary equipment on that vehicle during sleeping or resting in a sleeper berth for greater than 5 minutes at any location when within 100 feet of a restricted area, except as noted in Subsection (d) of the regulation. b. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind on-road equipment operators of the 5-minute idling limit. AQ-2e Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle restricting measures for off-road vehicles during the construction phase of the Project: a. Off-road diesel equipment shall comply with the 5-minute idling restriction identified in Section 2449(d)(3) of the CARB In-Use off-Road Diesel regulation: www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/ordiesl07/frooal.pdf. b. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind off-road equipment operators of the 5-minute idling limit. AQ-2f Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit a geologic evaluation under the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, to determine if Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) is present within the area that will be disturbed. NOA has been identified as a toxic air contaminant by the CARB. If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site, the Applicant must 1) comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the SLOAPCD; 2) require that Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact any crushing operations do not result in any dust that is visible crossing the property line, does not discharge into the air any visible emissions other than uncombined water vapor, for a period aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour which are 50 percent as dark or darker in shade as that designated as number one on the Ringlemann Chart or exceed at 10 % opacity; and 3) conduct a geological evaluation prior to any grading. Technical Appendix 4.4 of the SLOAPCD CEQA Handbook includes a map of zones throughout the County where NOA has been found. More information on NOA is available at http://www.slocleanair.org/business/asbestos.php. AQ-2g Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the Applicant shall comply with asbestos containing material (ACM) requirements. Demolition activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues surrounding proper handling, demolition, and disposal of ACM. ACM could be encountered during demolition or remodeling of existing buildings. Asbestos can also be found in utility pipes and pipelines (transite pipes or insulation on pipes). If utility pipelines are scheduled for removal or relocation or a building(s) is proposed to be removed or renovated, various regulatory requirements may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M asbestos NESHAP). These requirements include but are not limited to: (1) notification to the SLOAPCD; (2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified Asbestos Inspector; and (3) applicable removal and disposal requirements of identified ACM. More information on asbestos is available at http://www.slocleanair.org/business/asbestos.php. AQ.4 Construction activities associated with remediation would generate toxic emissions that exceed SLOAPCD Remediation AQ.4 Implement mitigation measures AQ-1a through AQ-1g, and AQ-2a through AQ-2g. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-11 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact thresholds for impacts to sensitive receptors. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Section 4.2) BIO.1 Site remediation has the potential to result in both short- term and long-term impacts to habitat for listed and special status species. Remediation BIO-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a final restoration plan to the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building, City of San Luis Obispo, Department of Natural Resources, USFWS, USACE, and CDFW for review. The restoration plan shall be approved by San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building USFWS, and CDFW in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo, Department of Natural Resources. The final plan shall be revised as necessary to adequately mitigate actual disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species due to remediation. Conservation easement(s) shall be recorded on all property associated with the final restoration plan that is not designated for development. Draft conservation easement agreements, in a form approved by County Counsel and the City Attorney, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal of the final restoration plan. The final conservation easements shall be approved by the County and City in consultation with other resource agencies, and recorded, prior to final inspection of the restoration site(s) to protect biological resources in perpetuity. BIO-1b The Applicant shall conduct updated surveys of sensitive species habitats including sensitive plant species, CRLF, wetland habitat, and VPFS habitat) within the Project Site within the appropriate season immediately prior to the onset of any ground disturbances associated with the Project in order to evaluate the current occupancy of suitable habitat for sensitive species and to refine the final habitat mitigation replacement acreages. Updated surveys for federally listed species shall be completed per the timing and methodology Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact specified by resource agency protocol. BIO-1c The final restoration plan shall provide for plant salvaging and replanting where appropriate (e.g., San Luis Obispo dudleya), restoration, and/or creation of habitat suitable for special status plant species including Cambria morning glory, Congdon’s tarplant, San Luis Obispo owl’s clover, Hoover’s button- celery, San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya, and purple needlegrass. To offset impacts to VPFS habitat, the final restoration plan shall require a minimum of a 1:1 creation or restoration replacement of all VPFS habitat impacted by remediation or restoration efforts (or at least 14.78 acres of VPFS habitat depending on final disturbance acreages). The restoration shall be designed to restore or enhance enough habitat to ensure the final restoration replacement ratio. The final plan shall also include defined schedules of restoration efforts, success criteria, weed management methods including for those areas not being remediated or developed to ensure weed species do not encroach into restored areas, monitoring schedules, reporting requirements, and a Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan, (see mitigation measure BIO-5c). The objective of the Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be to assess if the restored habitats are functioning equal to or better than pre-Project conditions. The assessment of function shall be based on indicators such as wildlife use and presence of sensitive species within the habitats compared to pre-Project conditions. BIO-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the County to fund and provide access for a County-approved in consultation with the City) independent biological monitor who shall regularly review and monitor remediation and restoration efforts to ensure that conditions of approval are being enforced and that success criteria are being met. The independent biological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt activities if permit requirements and conditions are not being Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-13 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact met. BIO-1e If performance standards detailed in the Final Restoration Plan are not achieved in any restoration area, the Applicant shall submit and implement an alternative or adaptive mitigation strategy during the restoration and monitoring phase, for approval to the County or City, and appropriate resource agencies including the USFWS and CDFW. BIO-1f The monitoring results collected as part of the Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be reported at least annually to the County, City, and appropriate resource agencies (i.e., USFWS and CDFW). The annual report shall document the effects of the proposed Project to the VPFS on the property and include acreage of occupied habitat that was impacted. The report shall contain a discussion of the problems encountered in implementing sensitive species habitat protection and other protective measures and recommendations for adaptive management to enhance the conservation of sensitive species habitat. BIO-1g Remediation and restoration activities within 100 feet of potential or occupied VPFS habitat shall be scheduled to occur when the soil is dry to the touch both at the surface and one inch below the surface. After any precipitation event of greater than 0.2 inches, Project activities will only occur after the soil has dried sufficiently as described above, and no sooner than 48 hours after the rain event ends to reduce potential impacts to sensitive VPFS habitat outside of the construction and remediation boundaries. Project activities in upland areas can occur during the rainy season with appropriate habitat protection measures including exclusion fencing, biological monitoring, and sediment control measures to ensure that construction related materials do not enter VPFS habitat. BIO-1h Only qualified, USFWS-approved, personnel with demonstrable field experience conducting VPFS cyst collection and reintroduction, consistent Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact with the proposed Project activities, shall handle VPFS cysts, identify VPFS habitat, and conduct VPFS monitoring. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall assist with marking the limits of disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species. Work shall not be conducted in areas marked for avoidance. BIO-1i The VPFS-qualified biologist shall conduct sensitive vernal pool branchiopod surveys within the appropriate season immediately prior to the start of construction activities per the timing and methodology specified by USFWS protocol. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall monitor during construction activities in the vicinity of habitats to be avoided. The final acreage of habitat loss shall be revised as necessary to adequately mitigate actual disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species due to remediation. BIO-1j The VPFS-qualified biologist shall conduct cyst collection efforts (cyst- bearing soil) and storage efforts from work areas prior to construction activities from the entire work area of each impacted pool when the ephemerally wetted areas are dry. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall follow USFWS standard procedures and guidance established in that agency’s permitting process The cysts shall be stored in labeled containers that are adequately ventilated. The cysts shall be kept out of direct sunlight to prevent excessive heating of the soil. The cysts shall be kept out of direct contact with water. When restored VPFS habitat is constructed, the inoculum shall be placed within the surface layer of the soil in a manner following USFWS protocols and guidance. BIO-1k Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, the Project Applicant (via the USACE) shall consult with the USFWS and NMFS to obtain an Incidental Take Statement, pursuant to Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act to cover the Project's "take" (which includes the permanent and temporary loss of VPFS habitat and the potential impact to south-central coast steelhead habitat). The Applicant shall comply with all measures issued by USFWS and Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-15 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact NMFS for the Project. BIO-1l Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Project Applicant shall be required to obtain all applicable Federal and State permits and/or agreements, including, but not necessarily limited to: a Section 404 Permit from the USACE; and a Section 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW. BIO.2 Site remediation and restoration would result in the taking of listed specimens, special- status species, or species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Remediation BIO-2a Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall fund and implement a biological resources training program for all construction workers and their contractors to minimize potential impacts to sensitive wildlife species. Training shall occur prior to initial construction activities and again, annually and as needed for new workers. Prior to issuance of demolition permit, the training program shall be reviewed and approved by the County Department of Planning and Building in consultation with the Environmental Monitor (see EM-1) and City, and shall include a description of important biological resources within the Project Site and all applicable conditions, permit requirements, and protection measures implemented to protect those resources. BIO-2b Prior to construction activities, all grading limits and construction boundaries shall be delineated by construction fencing. Sensitive species habitat shall be delineated with specific sensitive species labeling (e.g., permanent signage every 100 feet along the fence stating “No Entry Sensitive Habitat.”). The County shall approve the fencing prior to commencement of grading activities including clearing and grubbing). BIO-2c Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the County to fund a biological monitor, selected by the Applicant and approved by the County in consultation with the City and the USFWS to minimize potential impacts to sensitive species. The County-qualified biologist Less than significant with mitigation for VPFS, and other Sensitive Species, MBTA, and Aquatic Species Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact shall conduct sensitive species’ (including CRLF) surveys immediately prior within the appropriate season) to construction activities and shall monitor during construction activities in the vicinity of habitats to be avoided. Any sensitive species observed during the pre-construction surveys shall be relocated out of harm’s way by a qualified and permitted biologist into the nearest suitable habitat as determined in consultation with the jurisdictional resource agency outside the disturbance area. Construction and sediment control fencing shall be inspected each work day during construction activities to ensure that sensitive species are not exposed to hazards. The Applicant shall be responsible for conducting inspections of the work area each work day to ensure that excavation areas, restored habitats, and other open water habitat in the area do not have oil sheen, liquid oil, or any other potential exposure risk to wildlife. If any exposure risk is identified, the Applicant shall implement measures that could include, but are not limited to hazing, fencing, and wildlife removals to eliminate the exposure risk. The Applicant shall prepare and submit for approval, as part of the Final Long- Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan, an Oiled Wildlife Contingency Plan to the County and CDFW. BIO-2d To minimize potential impacts to nesting native bird species, and in compliance with the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, or 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, all activities resulting in ground disturbances during all phases of remediation, restoration, pipe removal, and construction activities involving vegetation removal/trimming shall be done, as feasible, outside the breeding season (February 15 through August 31). If vegetation must be removed during this period, then the Applicant shall retain a biologist acceptable to the County in consultation with the City to conduct surveys for nesting birds. Surveys shall be conducted within three days prior to vegetation removal or other construction-related disturbances. If nesting birds are observed within the vicinity, then a minimum 100-foot buffer from the nest would be established. The buffer would be Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-17 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact delineated by orange construction fencing or other delineator approved by County in consultation with the City and signage and would remain in place until the nest is abandoned or the young have fledged. The qualified biologist shall be present when any buffer fencing is established. The qualified biologist shall monitor the nest to ensure that Project activities do not violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or the California Fish and Game Code. At minimum, the biologist would check for new active nests, and determine the status of ongoing active nests, weekly during the specified nesting season. The biologist would ensure that all fencing and signage was properly maintained, and would provide weekly, or less frequent if requested by the agencies, e- mail updates on the status of all monitored nests to the County, City, CDFW, and USFWS. If the biologist determines that nesting is being disrupted, the construction activities shall cease and wait until a new buffer area is determined, the young have fledged, or the nest is determined to have failed. BIO-2e Hawks and owls nest earlier than most other native birds. If initial construction activities, ground disturbance, or vegetation clearing involving vegetation removal/trimming occurs from December 1 through August 31, the nest monitor would conduct a pre-construction survey within three days prior to vegetation removal or other construction-related disturbances focused on actively nesting hawks or owls. If any actively nesting hawks or owls are found, a 500-foot buffer would be established around the nest tree to help ensure that nesting is not disrupted. The buffer would be delineated by orange construction fencing and signage and would remain in place until the nest is either abandoned or the young have fledged. The nest monitor would be present when any buffer fencing is established. BIO.3 Site remediation and restoration could result in short-term and Remediation BIO-3a The final restoration plan shall require a 2:1 replacement of all native grassland (as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and CDFW) impacted by remediation efforts of the Project (at least 6.73 impacted acres as described in Padre 2008c). Implementation of the native grassland restoration shall Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-3b The final restoration plan shall require a 1:1 replacement of all Waters/wetlands of the U.S. and one-parameter wetlands (42.93 acres) temporarily impacted by remediation and restoration efforts) . Implementation of the wetland and habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-3c Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate that all staging areas, equipment storage areas, stockpile sites, and refueling areas are located at least 100 feet from surface water bodies and wetland habitats to minimize the potential for releases into surface water or wetland habitat. BIO-3d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for approval to the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building. The final plan shall be revised as necessary to include any updated contours of the final grading as determined in the final restoration plan. The SWPPP shall adequately mitigate any potential impacts resulting from storm water flow into sensitive habitats. The SWPPP shall ensure that all remediation and restoration activities, especially those activities occurring within the riparian and stream corridors that could result in turbidity or release of contaminated material into sensitive habitats employ measures such as sediment fences or other containment devices and construction best management practices to minimize the potential for impacts to sensitive habitats. BIO.4 Site remediation would adversely Remediation BIO-4a The final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) shall be implemented to improve the value and function of existing wetlands on site that would result in a 1:1 ratio Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-19 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact affect federal wetlands as defined in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and State Wetlands. of restored wetlands to wetlands lost due to Project disturbances. Implementation of wetland restoration shall follow the plan, including locations of existing wetlands to be restored, restoration techniques, schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. The final plan shall also include a Long- Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan (MM BIO-1c) that will include performance standards to assess whether the restored wetland habitats are functioning similar to pre-Project conditions. BIO-4b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain a Section 404 permit prior to disturbance of wetland areas. Consultation with the USFWS and NMFS shall be completed during the Section 404 permitting process. The Applicant shall comply with all measures issued by USFWS and NMFS for the Project. These measures could include, but are not limited to habitat restoration, habitat enhancement, biological resources training, biological monitoring, sensitive species relocation effort, restoration monitoring and reporting, and agency approval of restoration efforts. with mitigation BIO.5 Site remediation and restoration would result in habitat alteration that precludes the re-establishment of native populations of plants and animals. Remediation BIO-5a The terrestrial ecosystem portion of the final restoration plan shall include success criteria for re-establishing populations of native plants and wildlife. BIO-5b The final restoration plan, shall be implemented to restore at least 4.0 acres of phreatophytic woodland, 27.0 acres of mixed hardwood/forb field, 10.9 acres of coastal scrub chaparral, and 45.2 acres of forb field (Padre and WSP 2009). Implementation of the terrestrial habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-5c The function of the restored terrestrial habitats shall be monitored. A Long- Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be developed and Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact appended to the final restoration plan. The habitat management and evaluation plan shall include methods to determine if the restored areas are meeting success criteria per the approved restoration plan. The complementary plan shall include surveys to monitor the occurrence of native plants and animals in restored habitats relative to their occurrence in similar onsite habitats prior to, or unaffected by, remediation and development. BIO.6 Site remediation and restoration would temporarily impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi -aquatic wildlife species. Remediation BIO-6a The terrestrial ecosystem portion of the final restoration plan shall be reviewed and approved by the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo Natural Resources Manager. The plan shall include provisions to maintain and re-establish habitat linkages. BIO-6b The final restoration plan shall include consideration of on-site natural habitats and linkages to off-site, adjacent habitats, especially the South Hills Conservation Area. Less than significant with mitigation BIO.7 Site remediation and restoration have the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. Remediation BIO-7a A qualified biologist shall conduct surveys throughout areas proposed to be disturbed to determine the presence of wildlife species prior to ground disturbance. The biologist shall be on site during initial site disturbances (i.e., brush removal, top soil disturbances). Wildlife species encountered during the initial disturbances shall be relocated to suitable habitat out of potential danger. All handling and relocation of sensitive and non-sensitive wildlife species shall be conducted by biologists with appropriate authorizations and permits (CDFW and USFWS). Remediation activities, including restoration efforts shall be regularly monitored throughout the remediation and restoration phases to ensure that wildlife species have not entered work areas. The biological monitor shall conduct regular site inspections of the remediation and restoration activities to ensure that all applicable mitigation measures are being enacted. The biological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt activities if permit requirements and conditions are not being met. The biological monitor shall prepare an annual summary report describing site visit Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-21 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact observations and shall provide this report to the City, County, and regulatory agencies (including CDFW, USACE, and USFWS) for review. BIO-7b To minimize the potential for road mortality of wildlife, all nighttime traffic shall be minimized during the remediation and restoration phases and permitted only for activities required for safety reasons, emergencies, or equipment staging and vehicle maintenance necessary to comply with traffic and air quality mitigation measures; all hauling activities shall be restricted to daylight hours, defined as the hours after sunrise and before sunset. BIO-7c The Stockpiling Plan required by Mitigation Measure WR-3c shall also include methods to keep wildlife from coming into contact with stockpiled contaminated soils. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION (Section 4.3) T.1 Remediation activities related to the Project could result in potentially significant impacts to roadways in the Project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles creating an unsafe situation. Remediation T-1 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall develop a construction traffic management plan for review and approval by the City and County Public Works department in consultation with County Public Works and Caltrans. The plan shall include at least the following items: 1. Identification of haul routes for materials hauling and equipment deliveries. This section shall include a Haul Permit from Santa Barbara County Public Works. 2. Monitoring program for street surface conditions so that damage or debris resulting from construction or remediation of the Project can be identified and corrected by the Applicant. 3. A traffic control plan showing proposed temporary traffic control measures, including lane closure procedures, accommodation for pedestrians and cyclists, and removal procedures for the temporary traffic control devices and added Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact lanes. 4. A scheduling plan showing hours of operation to minimize traffic congestion during peak hours and special events. 5. The use of electronic message signs providing the traveling public with current construction information and the availability of alternate travel routes. 6. A park and ride program to reduce the number of worker single occupant vehicle trips going to the site. WATER RESOURCES (Section 4.5) WR.1 The remediation stage of the Project could result in short-term, impacts to surface water quality, including indirect impacts to beneficial uses such as threatened and endangered species habitat, due to polluted runoff during construction. Remediation WR-1a Prior to the issuance of any construction/grading permit and/or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, a Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be submitted to the California SWRCB Stormwater Permit Unit. Compliance with the General Permit includes the preparation of a SWPPP, which shall identify potential pollutant sources that my affect the quality of discharges to stormwater, and shall include the design and placement of (Best Management Practices) BMPs to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the Project Site into surface water sources or wetlands or storm drains. WR-1b The Surface Water Quality Management Practices summarized below shall be implemented to reduce potential impact to surface water quality during construction-related activities. 1. Soil stockpiles and graded slopes shall be covered after 14 days if inactivity and 24 hours prior to and during inclement weather conditions. 2. Fiber rolls shall be placed along the top of exposed slopes and at the toes of graded areas to reduce surface soil movement, as necessary. 3. A routine monitoring plan shall be implemented to ensure success of all on-site erosion and sedimentation control measures. 4. Dust control measures shall be implemented to graded areas during construction activities to control fugitive dust. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-23 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact 5. Streets surrounding the Project Site shall be cleaned daily or as necessary. 6. Best Management Practices shall be strictly followed to prevent spills and discharges of pollutants on site (material and container storage, proper trash disposal, construction entrances, etc.) WR.3 The excavation of the contaminated soils could bring contaminant constituents to the surface where they could be mobilized by stormwater or irrigation activities. Remediation WR-3a Contaminated soils that will be removed, relocated or treated on-site shall be managed according to the procedures and practices of the California Stormwater BMP Handbook. The Applicant shall conduct pre-construction environmental assessments of any contaminated soil prior to construction and have a specific treatment and BMP plan in order to prevent surface water, ground water or stormwater pollution. WR-3b All necessary precautions and preventive measures shall be taken to prevent the flow of water, including ground water, from mixing with contaminated soil. If water does enter an excavation and becomes contaminated, such water shall be discharged into clean watertight holding tanks and treated or disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local laws. WR-3c Polluted soils shall not be stockpiled on-site without an approved stockpiling plan. The stockpiling plan shall detail the method to be used to prevent runoff from leaving the area, and could include measures such as covering and berming. The stockpiling plan shall be consistent with the requirements specified in AQ.1d and BIO-7c. Stockpiles shall not be permitted near storm drains or watercourses. WR-3d The Applicant shall provide training to employees and contractors in contaminated soil identification, handling and disposal procedures. Regular meetings shall be held to discuss and reinforce disposal procedures. WR-3e Plastic sheeting, tarps, sandbags, straw wattles, silt fencing, and any other implemented BMP devices shall be treated as contaminated materials and shall be Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact removed and disposed of according to the local regulatory agencies. WR.4 The construction of the remediation caps may increase or concentrate storm runoff flowing onto erodible soils from impervious surfaces. Remediation WR-4a The impervious surface of the caps shall be designed to ensure that storm water discharge to surrounding conveyances is non-erosive. WR-4b The Surface Water Quality Management Practices summarized below shall be implemented to reduce potential impact to surface water quality during construction-related activities associated with remediation caps. Fiber rolls, or other equivalent techniques, shall be placed along the top of exposed edges of the cap and at the toes of graded areas to reduce surface soil movement, as necessary. Areas surrounding caps which are disturbed during construction shall be re- vegetated, as soon as is practical, prior to the beginning of the rainy season. Sandbags, or other equivalent techniques, shall be utilized along each graded cap area to prevent siltation transport to the surrounding areas. Less than significant with mitigation GEOLOGICAL AND SOIL RESOURCES (Section 4.7) GR.1 Remediation activities may cause erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground disturbing activities. Remediation GR-1a Prior to the issuance of the applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Remediation Project for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Public Works. The plan shall include features meeting the construction activities best management practices and the applicable provisions of the erosion and sediment control best management practices (ESC-1 through ESC-56) published in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks (Construction Activity) and best management practices (CD-4(2)) of the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Contractor's Guide and Specifications, to ensure that every construction site meets the requirements of the regulations during the time of construction. GR-1b Prior to the issuance of the applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare an Erosion Control Plan and Wet Weather Plan for review and approval by San Luis Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-25 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact Obispo County Public Works. The plan shall detail the Best Management Practices that will be used on the site to control erosion and sedimentation to be implemented during all remediation activities. The plan shall include at least the following measures unless other erosion control measures are specified in the agency approved SWPPP: a. Graded areas shall be stabilized with riprap (i.e., crushed stone) or other ground cover as soon as grading is completed. The surface of slopes shall be roughened during the construction period to retain water, increase infiltration, and facilitate establishing vegetation. Tracked machinery shall be operated up and down (parallel with) slopes to leave horizontal (perpendicular) depressions in the soil, which run across the slope, on the contour. b. Slope breaks, such as diversions, benches, or contour furrows shall be constructed to reduce the length of cut- and fill-slopes, thus limiting sheet and rill erosion and preventing gully erosion. c. Sediment barriers shall be used around construction areas to retain soil particles on-site and reduce surface runoff velocities during rainfall events. Sediment barriers could include straw bales, silt fences, and gravel and earth berms. Silt fences shall be placed on slope contours in areas where shallow overland flow is anticipated. d. Temporary and permanent drainages shall be employed, as necessary, to reduce slope erosion and prevent damage to construction areas. Sheet flow across or toward a disturbed area shall be intercepted and conveyed to a low to moderate gradient (1 to 5 percent slope) sediment basin, erosion-resistant drainage channel, or a level, well-vegetated area. Drainages would include swales, diversion dikes, and slope drains. e. Water bars, rolling dips, and out-sloping roads shall be constructed as part of new road construction to disperse runoff and reduce the erosive forces associated with concentrated flows. Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact NOISE AND VIBRATION (Section 4.8) N.1 On-site construction activities could generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Remediation N-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that the crushing plant is located at least 1,500 feet away from any residential receptor or an equivalent distance or is treated with some other form of acoustical mitigation (e.g., located within an enclosure) to ensure noise levels at the closest residential receptor are below 60 dBA. The location of the crushing plant shall be identified on the site plan for the grading permit. If noise reducing measures are applied instead of increased distances, vibration calculations shall be performed to demonstrate that vibration impacts would remain below the applicable thresholds N-1b The Applicant shall ensure that all construction activity at the Project Site including deliveries and arriving and departing workers) is limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and prohibit activities on Saturdays, Sundays, and federal holidays. If activities outside this timeframe occur, noise monitoring shall be established to demonstrate that applicable noise codes are not exceeded. This shall be a note placed on all construction plans. N-1c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, and throughout construction, the Applicant shall ensure that all construction machinery is maintained according to the manufacturers’ specifications and ensure that mufflers and silencers are maintained properly. Back-up OSHA noise indicators shall be ambient sensitive and self-adjusting to minimize backup indicator noise or flaggers shall be used in the place of backup alarms (as allowed by OSHA). N-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall provide formal notification to all sensitive receptors (including residential and office) within 1,000 feet of the Project area prior to commencing the blasting or rock crushing operation. The notification should identify potential noise, work hours and time frame, and contact information. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the notice and a list of addresses to where the notice was sent (see N-2). Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-27 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact N.2 On-site construction activities including blasting of rock could generate vibration impacts to nearby areas. Remediation N-2 Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit a blasting plan for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building for all blasting activities at the site that includes: 1. Informing the public about the Project and potential blasting-related consequences; 2. Scheduling the work to reduce adverse effects; 3. Designing the blast to reduce vibration and air over pressure including limiting the size of blasting charges and confinement to the minimum feasible; 4. Using blast signals to notify nearby residents that blasting is imminent; 5. Monitoring and recording the vibration and air overpressure effects of the blast; 6. Responding to and investigating complaints; 7. If complaints are received, blasting shall not resume until it has been determined whether an adaptive blasting strategy needs to be implemented; and 8. Providing formal notification to all sensitive receptors (including residential and office) within 1000 feet of the Project area prior to commencing the blasting or rock crushing operation. The notification should identify potential noise, work hours and time frame, and contact information. Less than significant with mitigation CULTURAL RESOURCES AND ARCHAEOLOGY (Section 4.9) CR.1 Impacts to paleontological resources due to ground disturbance as a result of remediation activities. Remediation CR-1a Prior to issuance of grading permits for the project, the Applicant shall prepare a Paleontological Monitoring and Mitigation Plan to preserve and protect any fossil resources that may be uncovered during deep excavations at the Project Site. The Plan shall be prepared by a Principal Paleontologist who meets SVP professional qualification standards and shall be consistent with SVP Guidelines. The Plan shall include, at a minimum: Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact 1. Provisions for paleontological monitoring under the supervision of the Principal Paleontologist during all excavation greater than 5 feet deep; 2. Descriptions of how salvage and/or preservation will be conducted if fossils are encountered; 3. Standards for recording fossil localities in the field, analyzing and preparing recovered remains in the laboratory, and reporting results; 4. Health and safety procedures to be implemented by monitors during work at the Project Site; and 5. A curation agreement with qualified repositories for scientific research and public education. Monitoring shall entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected, if appropriate. Monitoring efforts may be reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the Principal Paleontologist if, after 50 percent of the excavations are completed, no fossil resources are encountered. CR-1b If paleontological resources are discovered during any ground disturbing activities, the Applicant or their agents shall immediately cease all work activities within 50 feet of the discovery until the Provisions of the Paleontological Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (MM CR-1a) are implemented. Any required significance evaluation or fossil recovery shall be fully funded by the Applicant and completed under the supervision of a Principal Paleontologist who meets SVP professional qualification standards. Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until authorization is received from the County or City Department of Planning and Building. CR-1c The Applicant shall design and implement a Worker Education Program that shall be provided to all Project personnel who may encounter and/or alter paleontological Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-29 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact resources, including construction supervisors and field personnel. No construction worker shall be involved in field operations without having participated in the Worker Education Program. The training shall be prepared by the Principal Paleontologist and shall provide a description of the fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, outline steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made, and provide contact information for the Project Paleontologist and on-site monitor(s). The training may be conducted concurrent with other environmental or safety awareness and education programs for the Project, provided that the program elements pertaining to paleontological resources is provided by a qualified instructor meeting applicable professional qualifications standards. CR.2 Impacts to historical resources at the Project Site due to ground disturbance as a result of remediation activities. Remediation CR-2a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, the Applicant shall fund and implement a Phase III archaeological data recovery program at Features 21 and 27. The data recovery shall be directed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist RPA) with expertise in historical archaeology, and shall be carried out in accordance with a Data Recovery Plan prepared in advance by the RPA and approved by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. All artifacts and other remains shall be analyzed according to current professional standards. A final technical report shall be prepared that describes field and laboratory methods, results of technical analysis of recovered materials, and site interpretations. Artifacts, records, and other associated materials shall be deposited with an appropriate curation facility following completion of the work; the Applicant shall be responsible for all curation costs. A Chumash tribal representative shall monitor all excavation. CR-2b Presently 37 features are located outside the remediation areas of impact. However, if project design plans change to include these areas then prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall fund and implement a Phase II/III archaeological data recovery program at Features 1, 2, 4, 6, 7-9, 12-18, 22-23, 25-26, 28-32, 34-35, 39-42, 44, 46, 48-50, 52, 53, and 55 . Without proper subsurface testing and evaluation, the significance of each of these features remains unknown. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact Therefore, for management purposes they are assumed to embody the site’s significant qualities. The data recovery program at these features shall use a phased approach which first defines their significant qualities and then recovers a representative sample. The work shall follow the “consolidated approach” outlined in the City of San Luis Obispo Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines (October 2009 edition); the approach shall be described in detail in a Data Recovery Plan prepared in advance by the RPA and approved by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. The work shall be directed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) with expertise in historical archaeology. If the Applicant’s Consultant completes a separate report on the testing and evaluation of these features, and it is reviewed by the EIR Consultant, then additional testing and/or mitigation may not be required for some of these features. All artifacts and other remains recovered from these features shall be analyzed according to current professional standards. A final technical report shall describe field and laboratory methods, results of technical analysis of recovered materials, and site interpretations. Artifacts, records, and other associated materials shall be deposited with an appropriate curation facility following completion of the work; the Applicant shall be responsible for all curation costs. A Chumash tribal representative shall monitor all excavation. CR-2c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, Features 58-72 shall be documented to Level 1 standards of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). The County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building shall ensure that HAER documentation is carried out by a qualified architectural historian who meets the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History. HAER documentation shall include a Historic Structure Report (HSR) prepared to National Park Service HABS/HAER standards and guidelines. All work shall be fully funded by the Applicant and approved by the County. The HSR shall include a set of measured drawings and large format black-and-white 8-by-10 inch archival quality prints and negatives produced by a professional photographer. The photographs should include a minimum of twelve views, including interior and Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-31 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact exterior views of the character-defining elements of the remnant tanks and reservoirs, and existing drawings or historic views. All reports along with two sets of prints shall be submitted to the California State Library in Sacramento and the History Center of San Luis Obispo County. CR-2d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall insure that construction fencing is placed around the construction zone prior to the start of construction to protect the remaining unevaluated resources outside the Area of Direct Impact (ADI). Fencing shall ensure a minimum buffer of 20 feet around any unevaluated cultural features (unless otherwise determined by a Registered Professional Archaeologist). Areas outside the protective fencing shall be designated as Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA). The fence installation shall be monitored by the RPA to insure no impact to any cultural resources, and shall be periodically inspected by an environmental monitor to ensure that it remains in place throughout the duration of construction. CR-2e Prior to completion of the grading portion of the remediation component of the Project, the Applicant shall prepare a Cultural Resources Management Plan CRMP) which is integrated with the long-range Open Space Management Plan. The CRMP shall be approved by the County in consultation with the City. The CRMP shall include, but not limited to, specification of policies and procedures to manage and protect cultural resources on the entire Project Site from impacts by future projects or use of the Project Site. The CRMP preparation and implementation shall be fully funded by the Applicant, developed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), and shall be made applicable to the Project Site in perpetuity, through recordation of restrictive covenants in a form approved by the County, in consultation with the City. CR-2f Prior to completion of the grading portion of the remediation component of the Project and subsequent to completion of Phase III data recovery, the Applicant shall fund the preparation of public interpretive materials including, but not limited to, a Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact small plaque and display kiosks approved by the County in consultation with the City to be placed in an easily accessible location on the southern and northern parcels of the Project Site, and on a website or static exhibit suitable for display at The History Center, San Luis Obispo Public Library, and/or other appropriate public location within the City of San Luis Obispo. CR.3 Inadvertent discovery of archaeological remains during remediation activities. Remediation CR-3a The Applicant will design and implement a Worker Education Program that will be provided to all Project personnel who may encounter and/or alter historical resources or unique archaeological properties, including construction supervisors and field personnel. No construction worker will be involved in field operations without having participated in the Worker Education Program. The Worker Education Program shall include, at a minimum: 1. A review of archaeology, history, prehistory and Native American cultures associated with historical resources in the Project vicinity. 2. A review of applicable state and local ordinances, laws and regulations pertaining to historic preservation. 3. A discussion of site procedures to be followed in the event that unanticipated cultural resources are discovered during implementation of the Project. 4. A statement by the construction company or applicable employer agreeing to abide by the Worker Education Program, City and County policies and other applicable laws and regulations. The Worker Education Program may be conducted in concert with other environmental or safety awareness and education programs for the Project, provided that the program elements pertaining to cultural resources are provided by a qualified instructor meeting applicable professional qualifications standards. CR-3b If prehistoric or historic-period archaeological resources are discovered during any ground disturbing activities, the Applicant or their agents shall immediately cease all work activities within 50 feet of the discovery and immediately notify the City or Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-33 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. A Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) shall evaluate the significance of the discovery prior to resuming any activities that could impact the resource. If the archaeologist determines that the find embodies the significant qualities of the Project Site or offers previously unidentified data potential, the area of concern as determined by the RPA shall be avoided or a data recovery plan shall be developed. Any required testing or data recovery and/or curation shall be fully funded by the Applicant and completed by a RPA prior to construction being resumed in the affected area. Work shall not resume until authorization is received from the County and City Department of Planning and Building. CR.4 Inadvertent discovery of human remains during remediation activities. Remediation CR-4 If potential human remains are discovered, the Applicant or their agents shall comply with Section 15064.5 (e) (1) of the CEQA Guidelines and the Public Resources Code Section 7050.5. All work activities shall immediately cease in the area (within approximately 50 feet) of the discovery. A Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) shall inspect the remains and confirm that they are human, and if so shall immediately notify the County and City Departments of Planning and Building and contact the County Coroner in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). As provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, the NAHC shall identify the person or persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendent, in consultation with the County, City, and other Tribal representatives, makes recommendations for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Based on discussions with tribal representatives, fully funded by the Applicant, and subject to concurrence of the Most Likely Desendent (MLD), the following Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact treatments of human remains shall be considered (in order of preference): 1. Remains shall be left in place if at all possible through project redesign; 2. Remains shall be disinterred and reburied on the Project Site in a location not subject to further disturbance; 3. Remains shall be disinterred and reburied in a location provided by the Applicant and/or the County. Any disinterment of human remains shall be carried out with due care and respect, according to archaeological procedures. In situ Native American remains may be documented with drawings, measurements, and other non-destructive methods, but shall not be photographed or subject to destructive analysis without prior approval of the MLD. AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES (Section 4.10) AE.1 The Project remediation activities could degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Remediation AE-1a The Applicant shall ensure that graded areas for development pads that are not built on within two years of creation of the development pads, are temporarily landscaped or otherwise maintained as needed to cover exposed soils and maintain growth of weeds. Weeds shall be controlled to not be unsightly. AE-1b The Applicant shall ensure that fencing installed throughout the Project Site in order to implement institutional controls for management of the area for wildlife habitat shall contribute to the aesthetic character of the site and vicinity. Prior to issuance of grading permits for sites where fencing is required, the applicant shall submit to the County Department of Planning and Building for review and approval, in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo, site fencing plans. The plans shall include: fencing types that meet the functional requirements for the intuitional controls; fencing locations; materials and color palette consistent with City of San Luis Obispo design guidelines; and, as needed, complementary landscape to break- up the public view of the fencing. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-35 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.3 Asbestos exposure risk during site remediation activities. Remediation Implement mitigation measures AQ-1b and AQ-1c. Less than significant with mitigation AGRICULTURE (Section 4.15) AR.3 The remediation component of the Project would involve other changes in the existing environment, such as deed restrictions and a land use covenant on an adjacent property, which, due to their location or nature, could result in the conversion of farmland to non- agricultural use. Remediation Implement mitigation measures AQ-1b, AQ-2a, and AQ-2b. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.3 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate GHG emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Remediation No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant WATER RESOURCES (Section 4.5) WR.2 The use of groundwater resources as a water supply for remediation could substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Remediation WR-2 The Applicant shall work with the City of San Luis Obispo to obtain reclaimed water for use during the Remediation Project. Less than significant WR.5 Grading and recontouring of the site could result in changes to surface water flows, thereby increasing surface water runoff from the Project Site. Remediation No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant WASTEWATER (Section 4.6) WW.1 The wastewater generated from remediation activities could Remediation WW-1a Prior to the discharge of any wastewater from remediation activities the Applicant shall provide to the County a copy of the WDR from the RWQCB. WW-1b Prior to issuance of grading permits for remediation the Applicant shall prepare a Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-37 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact result in releases to the environment that could impact surface water or groundwater quality. Dewatering Contingency Plan that shall be submitted to the RWQCB for review and approval. The Applicant shall provide to the County a copy of the RWQCB approval letter for the Dewatering Contingency Plan. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.1 Potential health risk due to exposure to residual contamination following site remediation for future site uses. Remediation HM-1 Prior to issuance of grading or other related permits authorizing initiation of the remediation and restoration component of the project, the Applicant shall submit to the City and County written verification from the RWQCB that the Remedial Action Plan has been finalized and approved. Less than significant HM.2 Public accident risk associated with truck traffic during site remediation. Remediation No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant POPULATION AND HOUSING (Section 4.12) P/H.1 The remediation component of the Project may induce substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. Remediation No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES (Section 4.13) PS/U.1 Additional truck trips or construction activities could interfere with fire protection Remediation PS/U-1 The Applicant shall incorporate the following in the construction traffic management plan for review and approval by the City and County Public Works departments: Advance notification of emergency response providers near the Project Site of Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact emergency vehicles response times along Tank Farm Road. exact construction locations, potential lane closure schedules, and potential alternate routes. In order to avoid disruption to fire protection services’ access through the area, traffic safety procedures, including, but not limited to, flagmen and signs controlling traffic crossing Tank Farm Road. PS/U.2 Additional truck trips or construction activities could interfere with police protection emergency vehicles response times along Tank Farm Road. Remediation Implement mitigation measure PS/U-1 in order to further reduce the impacts generated by the Project. Less than significant PS/U.3 Construction equipment could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Remediation PS/U-3 To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. Less than significant PS/U.4 Remediation activities would generate solid waste requiring disposal at landfills. Remediation PS/U-4 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall submit a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) for approval by the San Luis Obispo County IWMA and the City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department if the City annexes the site prior to completion of the remediation component of the project) to maintain a diversion rate of at least 50 percent of construction waste from reaching the landfill. The County/City Monitor, IWMA (and the City Utilities Department if applicable) would also monitor the Applicant’s implementation of the SWMP and verify compliance with solid waste diversion requirements. The SWMP shall consist of information regarding, but not limited to: a. The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan; Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-39 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact b. A brief description of the Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project; c. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map; d. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site-separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility); e. The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled; f. A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan; g. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume); h. Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection shall report on a quarterly basis; i. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices; j. Recycling information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices; and k. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. RECREATION (Section 4.14) REC.1 The remediation Remediation No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than Impact Summary Tables-Remediation Chevron Tank Farm IST-1-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact activities could have a potential effect on existing recreational facilities and users. significant AGRICULTURE (Section 4.15) AR.1 The remediation and restoration activities would result in the conversion of farmland or grazing land to non- agricultural uses. Remediation No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant AR.2 The remediation and restoration activities would potentially conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or with a Williamson Act contract. Remediation No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-Remediation December 2013 IST-1-41 Chevron Tank Farm Road Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS IV Impacts – Proposed Project – Remediation Beneficial Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.5 Potential aircraft safety hazards due to changes in topography of the project site. Remediation No mitigation required. Beneficial Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact Summary Tables City Development Plan Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm i December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Page Class I Impacts ..................................................................................................................................................... IST-2-1 Class II Impacts.................................................................................................................................................... IST-2-4 Class III Impacts ................................................................................................................................................ IST-2-18 Class IV Impacts ................................................................................................................................................ IST-2-25 Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.7 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate diesel particulate and fugitive dust emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development AQ.7 Implement mitigation measure AQ-6b. Significant and unavoidable TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION (Section 4.3) T.5 The addition of Project traffic would cause nine intersections and two freeway segments to operate at unacceptable levels under Cumulative conditions. Development T-5a South Higuera Street and Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the right- of-way acquisition and intersection improvements to achieve LOS D operations. These improvements include: installation of second left turn lanes on the northbound, southbound, eastbound approaches; the addition of right turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches; and the addition of overlap phases on the eastbound and westbound approaches as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of either the City or the County Development portions of the Project. This project is not included in the City’s Transportation Impact Fee program or the AASP or MASP impact fee programs. Due to its size and complexity, the City should consider amending this project into one of the City’s impact fee programs. If amended into an impact fee program, the Project shall pay impact fees in accordance with the amended fee program. T-5b Los Osos Valley Road and U.S. 101 Southbound Ramps/Calle Joaquin –The Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of design and installation of a northbound left turn lane added to the future improvement on the Calle Joaquin approach, as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the Significant and unavoidable None Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact contribution of either the City or the County Development portions of the Project. This project is currently contained in the City’s TIF program as part of the Los Osos Valley Road Interchange Project however it will be not be constructed as part of the Interchange project currently underway. T-5c South Higuera Street and Tank Farm Road – Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second westbound right turn lane with an overlap phase concurrent with the southbound left and a second southbound left turn lane, as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of the City Development portions of the Project. T-5d South Higuera Street and Vachell Lane – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of the extension of Buckley Road to South Higuera Street. The AASP impact fee program contains part of the cost associated with the Buckley Road extension, but the impact fee program needs to be updated to reflect new project cost estimates and permitting requirements. T-5e South Higuera Street and Los Osos Valley Road- The applicant shall participate in their pro-rate share of either (1) The right-of-way acquisition, design, and installation a second southbound through lane, second southbound right-turn lane, and an eastbound right turn overlap signal phase concurrent with the northbound left turn; or (2) The extension of Buckley Road to the Los Osos Valley Road interchange (LOVR Bypass). This project is not currently in the City’s Circulation Element and is not contained in any impact fee programs established by the City or County. It is cumulative in nature and the City shall add this project into the TIF or AASP if the Circulation Element Update identifies it as an appropriate infrastructure improvement. Significant and unavoidable None Significant and unavoidable Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact T-5f Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road – Mitigation measure T-3a would also mitigate this cumulative impact. T-5g Broad Street and Tank Farm Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a northbound right turn lane, a southbound right turn overlap phase concurrent with the eastbound left, and conversion of the westbound right turn lane to a shared through right turn lane. T-5h Broad Street and Buckley Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound through lane and a second southbound through lane. T-5i Broad Street and Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound left-turn lane. None Significant and unavoidable Significant and unavoidable None Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.6 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate ROG+NOx emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development AQ-6a Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce area source emissions, where applicable. a. Increase walls and attic insulation by 20 percent above what is required by the 2008 Title 24 requirements. b. Shade tree planting along southern exposures of buildings to reduce summer cooling needs. c. Shade tree planting in parking lots to reduce evaporative emissions from parked vehicles. d. Use built-in energy efficient appliances, where applicable. e. Orient buildings toward streets with convenient pedestrian and transit access. f. Use double-paned windows. g. Use low-energy parking lot and streetlights. (e.g., sodium) h. Use energy efficient interior lighting. i. Incorporate energy efficient skylights into roof plan (i.e., should meet the EPA/DOE Energy Star® rating). j. Install High efficiency or gas space heating. k. Install door sweeps and weather stripping if more efficient doors and windows are not available. AQ-6b Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits or lease agreement, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce vehicle emissions. a. Locate electrical vehicle charging station(s) in the parking lots at a ratio Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact required by County or City ordinance or as recommended by APCD. b. In coordination with the City Transit Management, provide transit demand enhancements (i.e., additional stops, shelters, phones) within the Project impact area to meet the increased ridership demand associated with the Project. c. Provide on-site long-and short-term bicycle parking consistent with location and design criteria established by the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan, with installation and design guidance provided by the City’s Community Design Guidelines. One bicycle parking space for every 10 employees is considered appropriate. d. Provide shower stalls and locker facilities to encourage employees to bike or walk to work. e. The Applicant or lessee shall meet with SLOCOG’s Rideshare Program Coordinator to develop a Trip Reduction Plan to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director and APCD. The Trip Reduction Plan shall include the following: 1) A comprehensive Transportation Demand Management program for employees. The TDM may include: (a) private vanpool operation; (b) transit and vanpool fare subsidies; (c) pay parking for employees; (d) provision of subscription bus services; (e) alternative work hours; (f) capital improvements for transit services; (g) reduction of parking fees for carpools and vanpools; (h) Bikeway linkages to established bicycle routes; and (i) provision of an on-site employee transportation and rideshare coordinator. 2) Preferential carpool and vanpool parking for employees. 3) A lunch-time shuttle to reduce single occupant vehicle trips. 4) On-site facilities for eating and convenience including refrigeration, Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact automatic banking, and other vending for employees. 5) Incentive programs, similar to the County Rideshare Transportation Choices Program, to reduce employee commute trips. Programs should be coordinated with adjacent commercial development with a goal to achieve an Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) of 1.20 persons per vehicle or greater. 6) The Applicant shall set aside funds equivalent to three month enrollment in Rideshare’s Back ‘N’ Forth Club for 25 percent of all employees (a maximum of $52,230 for this project). This fund shall be managed by APCD through a program similar to the “Flash Pass” used for the San Luis Obispo Home Depot development. If funds are not used for this purpose, they may be used for other incentives that have been included in the approved Trip Reduction Plan. f. The Applicant shall coordinate with the City and APCD to pursue a shared use agreement to use over-supplied parking areas for a potential park-and-ride lot. The park-and-ride lot should be away from building entrances and as close as possible to the parking lot entrance nearest to Tank Farm Road or fronting street. The target number of park-and-ride spaces should be 25. The parking area should be identified with signage and registered with the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments as an official park-and-ride lot. g. Implement on-site circulation design elements in parking lots to reduce vehicle queuing and improve the pedestrian and bicycle environment. AQ-6c Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, if emissions of ROG+NOx with the above mitigations still exceed the thresholds, the Applicant shall secure SLOAPCD approved off-site reductions in ROG+NOx emissions from the SLOAPCD to ensure that ROG+NOx emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD daily and annual thresholds. Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AQ-6d Implement a program of periodic wet-vacuum street sweeping in coordination with APCD in order to reduce vehicle-related fugitive dust emissions. AQ.8 Operational and construction activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate GHG emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development AQ-8 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits for each phase, the Applicant shall include building efficiency improvements and/or off-site reductions in GHG emissions to ensure that GHG emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds. Less than significant with mitigation BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Section 4.2) BIO.8 The City Development Plan would result in permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and Development BIO-8a The final restoration plan shall include criteria that would require the restoration of at least a 2:1 replacement ratio (4.14 acres as defined by Padre 2008c) of all “native grasslands” habitat permanently lost in the development elements of the project. Restored native grassland habitat shall meet standards and criteria as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and CDFW within the proposed restoration of 45.2 acres of forb field habitat. Implementation of the terrestrial habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-8b The function of the restored native grassland habitats shall be monitored. A Long- Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be developed and appended to the final restoration plan. The habitat management and evaluation plan shall include methods to determine if the restored areas are meeting success criteria per the approved restoration plan including criteria of plant and wildlife species in restored habitats and to compare such results to pre-Project conditions. The complementary Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact regulations. plan shall include surveys to monitor the occurrence of native plants and animals in restored habitats relative to their occurrence in similar habitats prior to remediation and development. BIO-8c Hikers, pets, and bikers shall be excluded from sensitive habitats within the Project Site. The final SLO City and County-approved restoration plan shall include a fencing plan element with specific details on location, requirements of permanent and seasonal exclusion zones, and type of fencing to ensure that wildlife movement is not restricted. The fencing plan shall include information on placement of signs, educational placards, type of fencing required, method of exclusions, and monitoring and repair of exclusion devices, and shall include, at the least, a description and figure of those areas (i.e., VPFS habitat, vernal pool habitat, riparian habitat, and habitat in the process of being restored) that would require full time exclusion. BIO-8d The final restoration plan shall require a 2:1 replacement of the 3.71 acres of USACE Jurisdictional Waters/wetlands, isolated waters/wetlands, and one- parameter wetlands (for a replacement of 7.42 acres) permanently impacted by the City Development Plan. Implementation of the wetland and habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO.9 The City Development Plan would permanently impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi-aquatic wildlife species. Development BIO-9a To reduce impacts to wildlife migration, the Applicant shall include in the approved final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) landscape designs for planting of native vegetation along the northern portion of the City Development Plan area. The native vegetation landscaping shall be designed to provide wildlife species cover and refuge during migration. The landscaping shall be designed to shield migrating wildlife from human presence, noise, and lighting from residential and recreational activities in the City and County Development Plan footprint. Due to the 2 to 25 year duration of development phase, such planting shall occur on the onset of the Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact development phase. BIO-9b To reduce cumulative impacts to wildlife migration the Applicant shall include in the final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) a fencing plan element with specific details on location and requirements for the purpose of restricting wildlife movement through the development area but allowing movement through the open space areas. BIO.10 The City Development Plan has the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. Development BIO-10 Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City for approval. All Project lighting shall be designed to shielded spillage of light into adjacent preserved open space areas. Any structural part of the light fixture providing this shielding shall be permanently affixed. Outdoor lighting for buildings shall be restricted to lights required by code for lighting building exteriors and for safety and security needs. The lighting for the ball field shall not be on during period when there are no activities at the fields. In no case shall the lights at the ball fields be on between the hours of midnight and 7:00 AM. After initial installation of Project lighting, a City-approved biologist shall conduct a field inspection to confirm that the proper lamps have been installed and that light spillage into Open Space areas has been minimized to the maximum extent feasible without compromising safety or other critical night-lighting requirements. Less than significant with mitigation TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION (Section 4.3) T.3 Impacts to the City’s transit system could result due to increased ridership generated by the Project, impacts to bicycle Development T-3a Site Access (Northeastern Parcel): Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall install a multi- lane roundabout at the new intersection of Tank Farm Road and northern leg of Santa Fe Road accessing the Project Site. This improvement is consistent with the intersection control in the AASP. Also the Applicant shall extend the existing four lane section of Tank Farm Road thru the multilane roundabout. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact and pedestrian facilities could result from network discontinuities and unsafe crossings; impacts to site access and on-site circulation could result from queue spillback and the creation of additional conflict points. Transit: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall install transit facilities along Tank Farm Road to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department with direct pedestrian and bicycle connections to buildings on the Project Site. The Applicant shall also work with the City and SLO Transit to ensure that transit service capacity is adequate to serve the projected demand. Bicycle and Pedestrian: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall, at a minimum, install the following bicycle and pedestrian facilities: 1) a continuous Class I multi-use path along the north side of Tank Farm Road, 2) City standard 6.5 foot wide Class II bike lanes on the north and south sides of Tank Farm Road between the east and west boundaries of the entire Project Site along with appropriate transitions to existing Tank Farm Road, 3) a Class I multi- use path between Tank Farm Road and the southern limits of the Project Site connecting to the ‘Avila Ranch’ development project, 4) a Class I multi-use path through the north-west portion of the property (old Chevron Collector street location) with a provision to allow construction of a City sewer connection to the lift station, and 5) a Class I multi-use path through the north-east portion of the site linking the properties to the east to the Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road intersection. The precise alignment of these Class I paths shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development and Public Works Directors. T-3b Site Access (Northwestern Parcel): Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development, the Applicant shall redesign its major access to the northwestern parcel so that it is consolidated with adjacent parcels to minimize the potential for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts and to prevent a break in the median on Tank Farm Road. The recommended consolidated access point is proposed as a part of Tentative Tract Map 3009 and would require coordination with other property owners. T.4 The proposed construction Development T-4 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall submit a construction traffic management plan that includes a revised phasing plan Less than Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact phasing plan would disrupt vehicle and bicycle travel for an extended duration, and the proposed truck routes are inconsistent with the City’s Circulation Element. Construction activities related to the Project could result in potentially significant impacts to roadways in the Project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles. minimizing the duration of construction. In addition to the components described in mitigation measure T-1a, the plan shall ensure that adjacent sections of infrastructure be modified at the same time to minimize disruption of travel. The plan shall include proposed truck routes that do not use the Los Osos Valley Road interchange. The construction traffic management plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City’s Public Works Department in consultation with County Public Works and Caltrans. significant with mitigation GEOLOGICAL AND SOIL RESOURCES (Section 4.7) GR.4 Construction activities and grading may cause erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground disturbing activities. Development GR-4a Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall prepare a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) certified professional for the development Project for review and approval by the City. The plan shall include features meeting the construction activities best management practices and the applicable provisions of the erosion and sediment control best management practices (ESC-1 through ESC- 56) published in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks Construction Activity) and best management practices (CD-4(2)) of the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Contractor's Guide and Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact Specifications, to ensure that every construction site meets the requirements of the regulations during the time of construction. Further, the plan shall ensure compliance with and enrollment under the State Water Board General Construction Permit. GR-4b Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall prepare an Erosion Control Plan and Wet Weather Plan for review and approval by the City of San Luis Obispo. The plan shall detail the best management practices that will be used on the site to control erosion and sedimentation to be implemented during all development activities. The plan shall include at least the following measures unless other erosion control measures are specified in the agency approved SWPPP: a. Graded areas shall be stabilized with riprap (i.e., crushed stone) or other ground cover as soon as grading is completed. The surface of slopes shall be roughened during the construction period to retain water, increase infiltration, and facilitate establishing vegetation. Tracked machinery shall be operated up and down (parallel with) slopes to leave horizontal (perpendicular) depressions in the soil, which run across the slope, on the contour. b. Slope breaks, such as diversions, benches, or contour furrows shall be constructed to reduce the length of cut- and fill-slopes, thus limiting sheet and rill erosion and preventing gully erosion. c. Sediment barriers shall be used around construction areas to retain soil particles on-site and reduce surface runoff velocities during rainfall events. Sediment barriers could include straw bales, silt fences, and gravel and earth berms. Silt fences shall be installed per specification on slope contours in areas where shallow overland flow is anticipated. d. Temporary and permanent drainages shall be employed, as necessary, to reduce slope erosion and prevent damage to construction areas. Sheet flow across or toward a disturbed area shall be intercepted and conveyed to a low to moderate gradient (1 to 5 percent slope) sediment basin, erosion-resistant drainage channel, or a level, well-vegetated area. Drainages would include Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact swales, diversion dikes, and slope drains. e. Water bars, rolling dips, and out-sloping roads shall be constructed as part of new road construction to disperse runoff and reduce the erosive forces associated with concentrated flows. GR.5 Moderately expansive soils prone to swelling and shrinking from increased or decreased water content could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Development GR-5a Expansive soils should be mitigated by the over-excavation and replacement of non- expansive soils for all buildings and structures, as approved by the City of San Luis Obispo. Alternatively, all construction for buildings shall use thickened slabs, extended slab edges, and additional reinforcement to reduce negative impacts from any expansive soil movement. Several equivalent remedial measures may be implemented that are standard construction and mitigation measures. In addition, capillary breaks shall be used under slabs to address the potential for moisture transport and pumping that leads to moisture infiltration as a result of heat and moisture gradients where buildings are sensitive to moisture infiltration. All remedial measures, designs, and calculations shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. GR-5b The Applicant shall use low- to non-expansive soils for slab, trench backfill, and pavement support to eliminate risk, which can be accommodated by importing select materials. Select grading techniques could utilize the granular soils on-site for subsequent use. Alternatively, an equivalent remedial measure to mitigate expansive soils may be implemented where the appropriate design and calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer, demonstrate a suitable design, and have been reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. GR-5c Soils shall be properly compacted as specified by a registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer should also specify the appropriate soil-water content for expansive soil mitigation. The compaction levels and soil-water content shall be Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permit. GR.7 Compressible soils that underlie the site will be prone to excessive settlement that could adversely affect the proposed development and improvements. Development GR-7 Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall have a registered civil engineer prepare a geotechnical report based on the proposed development to the magnitude of total and differential settlements and time rates for waiting during construction. The report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The report shall discuss the measures that have been taken to ensure that the primary settlement is within acceptable limits for the proposed development. Acceptable measures could include but are not limited to: a. Surcharging the proposed building sites with fill for a specified time frame. Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the City for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. b. Partial or complete over-excavation of the clay layers and replacement with gravel drain layer and engineered fill. Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the City for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. c. Support structures on deepened foundations that extend thru the soft or unsuitable layers and derive support from suitable materials. Where necessary, the piles shall be required to be designed to withstand negative friction as necessary. Various foundations schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and practice in the industry. d. Perform in-situ remedial measures, such as sand drains, to accelerate and mitigate the anticipated settlements. Various schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact practice in the industry. NOISE AND VIBRATION (Section 4.8) N.3 Construction activities associated with the construction of the City Development Plan could increase noise levels in the area. Development N.3 Implement mitigation measures N-1a, N-1b, and N-1c. Less than significant with mitigation N.5 Development within the ALUP single event noise contours could cause the development to be exposed to unacceptable noise levels. Development N-5 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the incorporate noise reduction measures into the development design (i.e., extra insulation or thicker walls, window design) for all applicable land uses that would be located within the ALUP noise contours (Tentative Tract Map, Lot 1, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18 and portions of 6 and 14 within the 75 dBA contour and all or most of the remaining plots within the 65 dBA contour). Noise mitigation shall result in noise levels being at or below acceptable levels specified in the ALUP. Noise reduction measures shall clearly be identified with construction permit applications. Less than significant with mitigation AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES (Section 4.10) AE.2 The City Development Plan component of the Project would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its Development AE-2 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall ensure that all development projects are reviewed for consistency with the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan, the Airport Area Specific Plan design guidelines outlined in Section 5.0 Community Design, and the City’s Community Design Guidelines as part of the City Architectural Review process. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact surroundings. AE.3 The Project would generate a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Development AE-3 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan and lighting operation schedule for review and approval. The lighting plan shall demonstrate that direct views of light sources are shielded from nearby residences. The lighting schedule shall describe the number, location and amounts of lights, and the proposed hours of operation for the entire property. The lighting schedule shall propose the minimum number of lights, level of illumination, and hours of operation allowed by City codes and ordinances, including the City’s Night Sky Ordinance. The approved lighting schedule shall become a required condition of the lease between the property owner and any tenant on the Project Site. Less than significant with mitigation HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.6 Potential health risk from exposure to residual contamination following site cleanup and development. Development HM-6 Prior to recordation of applicable tract map, the Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels identifying specific limits on trenching activities and procedures for conducting subsurface construction activities. The Applicant shall maintain responsibility for air quality monitoring during any subsurface excavation activities. Less than significant with mitigation HM.8 Potential risk associated with the future use of acutely hazardous materials in the SLOCRA safety areas . Development HM-8 The Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels limiting on- site storage of AHMs to amounts less than the reportable quantities as currently defined in California Health and Safety Code §2770.5, California Accidental Release Program (CalARP) List of Substances, and California Code of Regulations 5189, Process Safety Management of Acutely Hazardous Materials, Appendix A. . Less than significant with mitigation PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES (Section 4.13) PS/U.5 Build-out of the City Development Plan could increase Development PS/U-5a The Applicant shall deed to the City property at the Project Site that the City could use for the development of a public Fire Station. Less than significant with Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact demand for fire protection services. PS/U-5b Development shall only be approved when the City deems that adequate fire suppression services and facilities, consistent with adopted travel time standards, are available, or will be made available concurrent with development at the Project Site. If, at time of development it is determined that the development site is outside of adequate response time zones, feasible options to enhance emergency access to the development sites may include but are not limited to the following: a. Completion of transportation improvements that improve emergency services travel time to proposed development sites. b. Co-location of City fire services with existing Cal Fire facilities located on Broad Street c. Establishment of fire facilities within a closer proximity to the development site that meet or exceed adopted travel time standards. d. Developer/Applicant financing of other improvements that will contribute to alleviating current deficiencies as identified in the SLOFD Master Plan. mitigation Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.5 Construction activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development Fugitive dust mitigation measures (see impact AQ.2) would be applicable to this phase of the Project as per SLOAPCD requirements. Less than significant AQ.9 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate CO emissions that produce localized CO Hot Spots. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant AQ.10 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate diesel PM emissions that produce localized, elevated cancer impacts. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION (Section 4.3) T.2 The addition of traffic generated by the Project would cause one intersection to operate at unacceptable levels Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact under Existing plus Project conditions. WATER RESOURCES (Section 4.5) WR.6 Paving and development could result in changes to surface water flows thereby increasing surface water runoff from the Project Site. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant WR.7 Flooding of development structures or redirection of flood flows could occur if buildings are built within the 100-year flood plain. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant WASTEWATER (Section 4.6) WW.2 The wastewater generated from the City Development Plan component of the Project would exceed the design capacity of the City’s downstream sewer lines or the capacity of the City’s water reclamation facility. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact GEOLOGICAL AND SOIL RESOURCES (Section 4.7) GR.2 Seismically induced ground shaking could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, potentially resulting in loss of property or risk to human health and safety. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant GR.3 Existing uncertified fill on-site could be subject to hydroconsolidation, excessive settlement, expansive soil shrink and swell, and differential settlement and expansion, and thus could damage proposed facilities, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant GR.6 Construction and improvement in areas lacking suitable factors of safety for existing slopes could result in gross or surficial instability, as well as Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact earthquake-induced landslides, which could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. NOISE AND VIBRATION (Section 4.8) N.4 Off-site City Development Plan related traffic would generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.7 Potential risk associated with development within the SLOCRA safety areas. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant HM.9 Risk associated with land use changes and aircraft wildlife strikes and other aircraft hazards. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant POPULATION AND HOUSING (Section 4.12) P/H.2 The City Development Plan may induce substantial growth in the area by Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact proposing new businesses in the area. PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES (Section 4.13) PS/U.6 Build-out of the City Development Plan land uses would create an incrementally higher demand for police protection services. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant PS/U.7 Construction and operation of the City Development Plan could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Development PS/U-7a If additional electrical or natural gas energy infrastructure is required to accommodate the proposed Project, the Applicant would be required to pay a fee to PG&E or SCG respectively, to provide additional service. PS/U-7b To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. PS/U-7c The Applicant shall comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with all adopted City policies regarding energy consumption such as: a. Incorporating cost-effective, renewable, energy resources into the Project; b. Providing passive features through site design that allows shade to reduce unwanted heat gain, thereby reducing the need to use energy for cooling; and c. Installation of energy efficient appliances, heat recovery equipment, and building energy management systems. Less than significant PS/U.8 Construction and operation of the City Development Plan could generate significant amounts Development PS/U-8a Pursuant to the City of San Luis Obispo’s Ordinance 1381, Chapter 8.05, a Recycling Plan for the City Development Plan to be implemented during construction shall be submitted for approval by the City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department, prior to building permit issuance. Throughout construction periods, documentation shall be provided to the City Utilities Department Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact of solid waste. demonstrating compliance with the plan and the City’s Ordinance 1381. The plan shall include strategies to increase recycling of construction materials, and documentation that a minimum of 50 percent of discarded construction materials are diverted from landfills. The plan may consist of the following information: a. The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan. b. A brief description of the proposed Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project. c. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map. d. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site-separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility). e. The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled. f. A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan. g. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume). h. Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection reporting on a quarterly basis. i. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. j. Recycle information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-2-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact k. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. PS/U-8b Pursuant to the City of San Luis Obispo’s Source Reduction and Recycling Element to achieve a 50% reduction in solid waste as required by AB 939, the project shall provide a plan for the disposal, storage and collection of solid waste material for the project. The plan shall include provisions for adequate recycling bin capacity as well as timely collection of recyclables. The development of the plan shall be coordinated with the City’s franchised solid waste collection and disposal firm, San Luis Obispo Garbage. PS/U.9 Development of the Project could impact availability of water supplies from the City water Utility. Development PS/U-9 The Development shall connect to the City’s reclaimed water system and shall use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation. Less than significant AGRICULTURE (Section 4.15) AR.4 The City Development Plan would result in the conversion of farmland or grazing land to non- agricultural uses. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant AR.5 The City Development Plan would involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Development AR-5 The Applicant shall design the development for the Northwest Operations Area such that the buildings are located near the eastern edge of the parcel. This mitigation measure would not apply if the agricultural property adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area has received entitlements from the City to develop the property prior to development of the Northwest Operations Area. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-City Development Plan December 2013 IST-2-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS IV Impacts – Proposed Project – City Development Plan Beneficial Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact RECREATION (Section 4.14) REC.2 The City Development Plan would increase the City’s recreational acreage stock with 15 acres of sports fields, as well as Class I and Class II bicycle lanes, while not adding residential development. Development No mitigation required. Beneficial Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact Summary Tables County Development Plan The majority of the City Development Plan impacts would also apply to the County Development Plan. All of the Applicable City Development Plan impacts have been reproduced in the County Development Plan Impact Summary Tables. As needed, in the description of the impact and the mitigation measures, reference to the City has been changed to the County. In some cases the mitigation measures had to be modified to apply to the County. Impacts marked with an asterisk (*) are applicable only to the County Development Plan. Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm i December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Page Class I Impacts ..................................................................................................................................................... IST-3-1 Class II Impacts .................................................................................................................................................... IST-3-5 Class III Impacts ................................................................................................................................................ IST-3-22 Class IV Impacts ................................................................................................................................................ IST-3-30 Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.7 Operational activities associated with the County Development Plan would generate diesel particulate and fugitive dust emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development AQ.7 Implement mitigation measure AQ-6b. Significant and unavoidable TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION (Section 4.3) T.5 The addition of Project traffic would cause nine intersections and two freeway segments to operate at unacceptable levels under Cumulative conditions. Development T-5a South Higuera Street and Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the right- of-way acquisition and intersection improvements to achieve LOS D operations. These improvements include: installation of second left turn lanes on the northbound, southbound, eastbound approaches; the addition of right turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches; and the addition of overlap phases on the eastbound and westbound approaches as determined by the County and the level of impact associated with the contribution of the County Development Project. This project shall pay an additional mitigation amount commensurate with their additional impact beyond cumulative conditions. T-5b Los Osos Valley Road and U.S. 101 Southbound Ramps/Calle Joaquin –The Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of design and installation of a northbound left turn lane added to the future improvement on the Calle Joaquin approach, as determined by the County and the level of impact associated with the contribution of the County Development portions of the Project however it Significant and unavoidable None Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact will be not be constructed as part of the Interchange project currently underway. T-5c South Higuera Street and Tank Farm Road – Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second westbound right turn lane with an overlap phase concurrent with the southbound left and a second southbound left turn lane, as determined by the County and the level of impact associated with the contribution of the County Development portions of the Project. T-5d South Higuera Street and Vachell Lane – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of the extension of Buckley Road to South Higuera Street. The AASP impact fee program contains part of the cost associated with the Buckley Road extension, but the impact fee program needs to be updated to reflect new project cost estimates and permitting requirements. T-5e South Higuera Street and Los Osos Valley Road- The applicant shall participate in their pro-rate share of either (1) The right-of-way acquisition, design, and installation a second southbound through lane, second southbound right-turn lane, and an eastbound right turn overlap signal phase concurrent with the northbound left turn; or (2) The extension of Buckley Road to the Los Osos Valley Road interchange (LOVR Bypass). This project is not contained in any impact fee programs established by the County but is cumulative in nature and the County shall add this project to traffic impact fees. T-5f Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road – Mitigation measure T-3a would also mitigate this cumulative impact. T-5g Broad Street and Tank Farm Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of Significant and unavoidable None Significant and unavoidable None Significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a northbound right turn lane, a southbound right turn overlap phase concurrent with the eastbound left, and conversion of the westbound right turn lane to a shared through right turn lane. T-5h Broad Street and Buckley Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound through lane and a second southbound through lane. T-5i Broad Street/Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound left-turn lane. and unavoidable Significant and unavoidable None WW.3* Discharges from the wastewater treatment plant would increase surface water flow rates and impact downstream properties. Development WW-3 Prior to recordation of a final map, commencement of tract improvements or issuance of the first building permit for the development phase, the Applicant shall receive a wastewater discharge permit from the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Applicant shall also submit, to the County Public Works Department for review and approval, a wastewater discharge plan for the wastewater treatment plant that shall be reviewed and approved by San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building and Public Works. The plan shall include the method that would be used to avoid discharges from the wastewater treatment plant that increase flows to the San Luis Obispo Creek during rain events that could result in increased flooding. The plan shall include at the minimum the following: 1. How creek levels would be monitored during rain events. 2. At what flow and water level in the creek would discharges to the creek be Significant and unavoidable Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS I Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in a “statement of overriding consideration” if the project is approved in accordance with Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measure Residual Impact halted. 3. The method used to hold wastewater during periods when it cannot be discharged. Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.6 Operational activities associated with the County Development Plan would generate ROG+NOx emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development AQ-6a Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce area source emissions, where applicable. a. Increase walls and attic insulation by 20 percent above what is required by the 2008 Title 24 requirements. b. Shade tree planting along southern exposures of buildings to reduce summer cooling needs. c. Shade tree planting in parking lots to reduce evaporative emissions from parked vehicles. d. Use built-in energy efficient appliances, were applicable. e. Orient buildings toward streets with convenient pedestrian and transit access. f. Use double-paned windows. g. Use sodium low-energy parking lot and streetlights. (e.g., sodium) h. Use energy efficient interior lighting. i. Incorporate energy efficient skylights into roof plan (i.e., should meet the EPA/DOE Energy Star® rating). j. Install High efficiency or gas space heating. k. Install door sweeps and weather stripping if more efficient doors and windows are not available. AQ-6b Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits or lease agreement, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce vehicle emissions. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact a. Locate electrical vehicle charging station(s) in the parking lots at a ratio required by County or City ordinance or as recommended by APCD. b. In coordination with the City Transit Management, provide transit demand enhancements (i.e., additional stops, shelters, phones) within the Project impact area to meet the increased ridership demand associated with the Project. c. Provide on-site long-and short-term bicycle parking consistent with location and design criteria established by the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan, with installation and design guidance provided by the City’s Community Design Guidelines. One bicycle parking space for every 10 employees is considered appropriate. d. Provide shower stalls and locker facilities to encourage employees to bike or walk to work. e. The Applicant or lessee shall meet with SLOCOG’s Rideshare Program Coordinator to develop a Trip Reduction Plan to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director and APCD. The Trip Reduction Plan shall include the following: 1) A comprehensive Transportation Demand Management program for employees. The TDM may include: (a) private vanpool operation; (b) transit and vanpool fare subsidies; (c) pay parking for employees; (d) provision of subscription bus services; (e) alternative work hours; (f) capital improvements for transit services; (g) reduction of parking fees for carpools and vanpools; (h) Bikeway linkages to established bicycle routes; and (i) provision of an on-site employee transportation and rideshare coordinator. 2) Preferential carpool and vanpool parking for employees. 3) A lunch-time shuttle to reduce single occupant vehicle trips. Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact 4) On-site facilities for eating and convenience including refrigeration, automatic banking, and other vending for employees. 5) Incentive programs, similar to the County Rideshare Transportation Choices Program, to reduce employee commute trips. Programs should be coordinated with adjacent commercial development with a goal to achieve an Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) of 1.20 persons per vehicle or greater. 6) The Applicant shall set aside funds equivalent to three month enrollment in Rideshare’s Back ‘N’ Forth Club for 25 percent of all employees (a maximum of $52,230 for this project). This fund shall be managed by APCD through a program similar to the “Flash Pass” used for the San Luis Obispo Home Depot development. If funds are not used for this purpose, they may be used for other incentives that have been included in the approved Trip Reduction Plan. f. The Applicant shall coordinate with the City and APCD to pursue a shared use agreement to use over-supplied parking areas for a potential park-and-ride lot. The park-and-ride lot should be away from building entrances and as close as possible to the parking lot entrance nearest to Tank Farm Road or fronting street. The target number of park-and-ride spaces should be 25. The parking area should be identified with signage and registered with the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments as an official park-and-ride lot. g. Implement on-site circulation design elements in parking lots to reduce vehicle queuing and improve the pedestrian and bicycle environment. AQ-6c Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, if emissions of ROG+NOx with the above mitigations still exceed the thresholds, the Applicant shall secure SLOAPCD approved off-site reductions in ROG+NOx emissions from the Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact SLOAPCD to ensure that ROG+NOx emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD daily and annual thresholds. AQ-6d Implement a program of periodic wet-vacuum street sweeping in coordination with APCD in order to reduce vehicle-related fugitive dust emissions. AQ.8 Operational and construction activities associated with the County Development Plan would generate GHG emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development AQ-8 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits for each phase, the Applicant shall include building efficiency improvements and/or off-site reductions in GHG emissions to ensure that GHG emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds. Less than significant with mitigation AQ.11* Operational activities associated with the County Development Plan WWTP could generate odor emissions. Development AQ-11 Prior to issuance of building or construction permits for the WWTP, the Applicant shall, where applicable, apply to the SLOAPCD for permits and develop an odor Control plan in coordination with the SLOAPCD. Less than significant with mitigation BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Section 4.2) BIO.8 The County Development Plan would result in permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats Development BIO-8a The final restoration plan shall include criteria that would require the restoration of at least a 2:1 replacement ratio (4.14 acres as defined by Padre 2008c) of all native grasslands” habitat permanently lost in the development elements of the project. Restored native grassland habitat shall meet standards and criteria as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and CDFW within the proposed restoration of 45.2 acres of forb field habitat. Implementation of the terrestrial habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-8b The function of the restored native grassland habitats shall be monitored. A Long- Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be developed and appended to the final restoration plan. The habitat management and evaluation plan shall include methods to determine if the restored areas are meeting success criteria per the approved restoration plan including criteria of plant and wildlife species in restored habitats and to compare such results to pre-Project conditions. The complementary plan shall include surveys to monitor the occurrence of native plants and animals in restored habitats relative to their occurrence in similar habitats prior to remediation and development. BIO-8c Hikers, pets, and bikers shall be excluded from sensitive habitats within the Project Site. The final SLO County-approved restoration plan shall include a fencing plan element with specific details on location, requirements of permanent and seasonal exclusion zones, and type of fencing to ensure that wildlife movement is not restricted. The fencing plan shall include information on placement of signs, educational placards, type of fencing required, method of exclusions, and monitoring and repair of exclusion devices, and shall include, at the least, a description and figure of those areas (i.e., VPFS habitat, vernal pool habitat, riparian habitat, and habitat in the process of being restored) that would require full time exclusion. BIO-8d The final restoration plan shall require a 2:1 replacement of the 3.71 acres of USACE Jurisdictional Waters/wetlands, isolated waters/wetlands, and one- parameter wetlands (for a replacement of 7.42 acres) permanently impacted by the County Development Plan. Implementation of the wetland and habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact actions if success criteria are not met. BIO.9 The County Development Plan would permanently impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi-aquatic wildlife species. Development BIO-9a To reduce impacts to wildlife migration, the Applicant shall include in the approved final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) landscape designs for planting of native vegetation along the northern portion of the County Development Plan area. The native vegetation landscaping shall be designed to provide wildlife species cover and refuge during migration. The landscaping shall be designed to shield migrating wildlife from human presence, noise, and lighting from residential and recreational activities in the County Development Plan footprint. Due to the 2 to 25 year duration of development phase, such planting shall occur on the onset of the development phase. BIO-9b To reduce cumulative impacts to wildlife migration the Applicant shall include in the final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) a fencing plan element with specific details on location and requirements for the purpose of restricting wildlife movement through the development area but allowing movement through the open space areas. Less than significant with mitigation BIO.10 The County Development Plan has the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. Development BIO-10 Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the County for approval. All Project lighting shall be designed to shielded spillage of light into adjacent preserved open space areas. Any structural part of the light fixture providing this shielding shall be permanently affixed. Outdoor lighting for buildings shall be restricted to lights required by code for lighting building exteriors and for safety and security needs. The lighting for the ball field shall not be on during period when there are no activities at the fields. In no case shall the lights at the ball fields be on during the hours of midnight and 7:00 AM. After initial installation of Project lighting, a County-approved biologist shall conduct a field inspection to confirm that the proper lamps have been installed and that light spillage into Open Space areas has been minimized to the maximum extent feasible without compromising safety or other critical night-lighting requirements. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact BIO.11* The County Development Plan, specifically the wastewater treatment plant component would result in short-term and permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. County Development BIO-11a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a spill/discharge plan with specific measures that would prevent untreated discharge or accidental releases, such as saline or chlorinated water and/or untreated water during storm events into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek to reduce exposure risks to aquatic species located downstream of proposed discharge. The discharge plan shall be approved by the County and shall include specific measures such as the use of stormwater basins, a complete water sampling schedule and methods for stormwater handling. BIO-11b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the Applicant shall demonstrate to the County that all open basins, including “polishing wetlands” or settling basins, that would require regular maintenance and/or vegetation management, containing any Project-related fluids shall be designed to exclude all wildlife, including birds, bats, and amphibians. Less than significant with mitigation TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION (Section 4.3) T.3 Impacts to the City’s transit system could result due to increased ridership generated by the Project, impacts to bicycle and pedestrian Development T-3a Site Access (Northeastern Parcel): Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall install a multi- lane roundabout at the new intersection of Tank Farm Road and northern leg of Santa Fe Road accessing the Project Site. This improvement is consistent with the intersection control in the AASP. Also the Applicant shall extend the existing four lane section of Tank Farm Road thru the multilane roundabout. Transit: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact facilities could result from network discontinuities and unsafe crossings; impacts to site access and on-site circulation could result from queue spillback and the creation of additional conflict points. shall install transit facilities along Tank Farm Road to the satisfaction of the County and City Public Works Department with direct pedestrian and bicycle connections to buildings on the Project Site. The Applicant shall also work with the County and SLO Transit to ensure that transit service capacity is adequate to serve the projected demand. Bicycle and Pedestrian: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall, at a minimum, install the following bicycle and pedestrian facilities: 1) a continuous Class I multi-use path along the north side of Tank Farm Road, 2) 6.5 foot wide Class II bike lanes on the north and south sides of Tank Farm Road between the east and west boundaries of the entire Project Site along with appropriate transitions to existing Tank Farm Road, 3) a Class I multi-use path between Tank Farm Road and the southern limits of the Project Site connecting to the ‘Avila Ranch’ development project, 4) a Class I multi-use path through the north-west portion of the property (old Chevron Collector street location) with a provision to allow construction of a City sewer connection to the lift station, and 5) a Class I multi-use path through the north-east portion of the site linking the properties to the east to the Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road intersection. The precise alignment of these Class I paths shall be subject to the approval of the County Department of Planning and Building.. T-3b Site Access (Northwestern Parcel): Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development, the Applicant shall redesign its major access to the northwestern parcel so that it is consolidated with adjacent parcels to minimize the potential for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts and to prevent a break in the median on Tank Farm Road. The recommended consolidated access point is proposed as a part of Tentative Tract Map 3009 and would require coordination with other property owners. T.4 The proposed construction Development T-4 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall submit a construction traffic management plan that includes a revised phasing plan Less than Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact phasing plan would disrupt vehicle and bicycle travel for an extended duration, and the proposed truck routes are inconsistent with the County’s Circulation Element. Construction activities related to the Project could result in potentially significant impacts to roadways in the Project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles. minimizing the duration of construction. In addition to the components described in mitigation measure T-1a, the plan shall ensure that adjacent sections of infrastructure be modified at the same time to minimize disruption of travel. The plan shall include proposed truck routes that do not use the Los Osos Valley Road interchange. The construction traffic management plan shall be subject to review and approval of the County’s Public Works Department in consultation with County Public Works and Caltrans. significant with mitigation WATER RESOURCES (Section 4.5) WR.8* The use of groundwater for the County Development Plan could result in substantially depleted groundwater supplies or interfere Development WR-8a The applicant shall implement water conservation best management practices including: selection of drought-tolerant, low water-consuming plant varieties and use of low flow plumbing fixtures. WR-8b The Applicant shall conduct annual monitoring of Wells 1, 2 and 3 on a semi- annual basis to determine water levels and correlate to water production values. The production rates shall be metered at the wells. This information shall be used to define drawdowns. The results of the monitoring and analysis shall be submitted to the County Public Works and Planning and Development Departments for Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact substantially with groundwater recharge. review on a semi-annual basis. In the event that the analysis shows a measurable loss of the well production rate, the Applicant shall reduce groundwater extractions from Well 1 to eliminate the potential for groundwater interference. WR.9* The use of groundwater for the County Development Plan could result in the migration of hydrocarbons from the shallow ground water to the deep groundwater wells. Development WR-9a Prior to issuance of building permits for the development Phase I of the County Development Plan, the Applicant shall prepare and implement a sentinel monitoring program that would include wells positioned and constructed to specifically monitor inflowing water in the vicinity of the groundwater wells that would provide information on any approaching petroleum-related constituents of concern. If petroleum-related constituent of concern are detected, then an adsorptive carbon canister system or other method approved by the RWQCB and the County shall be installed to assure that the water from the well meets drinking water standards. WR-9b Upon completion for the remediation activities, the Applicant shall abandon the existing groundwater well located in the Northwest Operations Area. The well shall be abandoned in accordance with applicable Department of Water Resources requirements. WR-9c The Applicant shall not use Well #4 as a source of water for the County Development Plan. Less than significant with mitigation WASTEWATER (Section 4.6) WW.4* The wastewater treatment plant discharges would increase pollutants into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Development WW-4a A Registered Civil Engineer shall design the tertiary treatment system for review and approval by the County of San Luis Obispo and State of California RWQCB. WW-4b The tertiary treatment system shall be designed to ensure that the outlet discharge from the treatment facility satisfies and is in compliance with meeting constituent concentration limits outlined in the RWQCB SWQO's. WW-4c A quarterly monitoring program will be established prior to construction. The Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact program shall provide for sampling and testing for all constituent compounds required by the RWQCB SWQO. The testing and monitoring program shall be reviewed and approved by the RWQCB and the County of San Luis Obispo. A Registered Civil Engineer shall perform the quarterly reports that shall be submitted to the RWQCB and the County of San Luis Obispo to ensure compliance. GEOLOGICAL AND SOIL RESOURCES (Section 4.7) GR.4 Construction activities and grading may cause erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground disturbing activities. Development GR-4a Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall prepare a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) certified professional for the development Project for review and approval by the County. The plan shall include features meeting the construction activities best management practices and the applicable provisions of the erosion and sediment control best management practices (ESC-1 through ESC- 56) published in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks (Construction Activity) and best management practices (CD-4(2)) of the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Contractor's Guide and Specifications, to ensure that every construction site meets the requirements of the regulations during the time of construction. Further, the plan shall ensure compliance with and enrollment under the State Water Board General Construction Permit. GR-4b Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall prepare an Erosion Control Plan and Wet Weather Plan for review and approval by the County of San Luis Obispo. The plan shall detail the best management practices that will be used on the site to control erosion and sedimentation to be implemented during all development activities. The plan shall include at least the following measures unless other erosion control measures are specified in the agency approved SWPPP: Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact a. Graded areas shall be stabilized with riprap (i.e., crushed stone) or other ground cover as soon as grading is completed. The surface of slopes shall be roughened during the construction period to retain water, increase infiltration, and facilitate establishing vegetation. Tracked machinery shall be operated up and down (parallel with) slopes to leave horizontal (perpendicular) depressions in the soil, which run across the slope, on the contour. b. Slope breaks, such as diversions, benches, or contour furrows shall be constructed to reduce the length of cut- and fill-slopes, thus limiting sheet and rill erosion and preventing gully erosion. c. Sediment barriers shall be used around construction areas to retain soil particles on-site and reduce surface runoff velocities during rainfall events. Sediment barriers could include straw bales, silt fences, and gravel and earth berms. Silt fences shall be installed per specification on slope contours in areas where shallow overland flow is anticipated. d. Temporary and permanent drainages shall be employed, as necessary, to reduce slope erosion and prevent damage to construction areas. Sheet flow across or toward a disturbed area shall be intercepted and conveyed to a low to moderate gradient (1 to 5 percent slope) sediment basin, erosion-resistant drainage channel, or a level, well-vegetated area. Drainages would include swales, diversion dikes, and slope drains. e. Water bars, rolling dips, and out-sloping roads shall be constructed as part of new road construction to disperse runoff and reduce the erosive forces associated with concentrated flows. GR.5 Moderately expansive soils prone to swelling and shrinking from increased or decreased water Development GR-5a Expansive soils should be mitigated by the over-excavation and replacement of non-expansive soils for all buildings and structures, as approved by the County of San Luis Obispo. Alternatively, all construction for buildings shall use thickened slabs, extended slab edges, and additional reinforcement to reduce negative impacts from any expansive soil movement. Several equivalent remedial measures may be implemented that are standard construction and mitigation measures. In Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact content could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. addition, capillary breaks shall be used under slabs to address the potential for moisture transport and pumping that leads to moisture infiltration as a result of heat and moisture gradients where buildings are sensitive to moisture infiltration. All remedial measures, designs, and calculations shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, and shall be reviewed and approved by the County prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. GR-5b The Applicant shall use low- to non-expansive soils for slab, trench backfill, and pavement support to eliminate risk, which can be accommodated by importing select materials. Select grading techniques could utilize the granular soils on-site for subsequent use. Alternatively, an equivalent remedial measure to mitigate expansive soils may be implemented where the appropriate design and calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer, demonstrate a suitable design, and have been reviewed and approved by the County prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. GR-5c Soils shall be properly compacted as specified by a registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer should also specify the appropriate soil-water content for expansive soil mitigation. The compaction levels and soil-water content shall be approved by the County prior to issuance of the applicable building permit. GR.7 Compressible soils that underlie the site will be prone to excessive settlement that could adversely affect the proposed development and improvements. Development GR-7 Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall have a registered civil engineer prepare a geotechnical report based on the proposed development to the magnitude of total and differential settlements and time rates for waiting during construction. The report shall be submitted to the County for review and approval. The report shall discuss the measures that have been taken to ensure that the primary settlement is within acceptable limits for the proposed development. Acceptable measures could include but are not limited to: a. Surcharging the proposed building sites with fill for a specified time frame. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the County for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. b. Partial or complete over-excavation of the clay layers and replacement with gravel drain layer and engineered fill. Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the County for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. c. Support structures on deepened foundations that extend thru the soft or unsuitable layers and derive support from suitable materials. Where necessary, the piles shall be required to be designed to withstand negative friction as necessary. Various foundations schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and practice in the industry. d. Perform in-situ remedial measures, such as sand drains, to accelerate and mitigate the anticipated settlements. Various schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and practice in the industry. NOISE AND VIBRATION (Section 4.8) N.3 Construction activities associated with the construction of the County Development Plan could increase noise Development N.3 Implement mitigation measures N-1a, N-1b, and N-1c. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact levels in the area. N.5 Development within the ALUP single event noise contours could cause the development to be exposed to unacceptable noise levels. Development N-5 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the incorporate noise reduction measures into the development design (i.e., extra insulation or thicker walls, window design) for all applicable land uses that would be located within the ALUP noise contours (Tentative Tract Map, Lot 1, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18 and portions of 6 and 14 within the 75 dBA contour and all or most of the remaining plots within the 65 dBA contour). Noise mitigation shall result in noise levels being at or below acceptable levels specified in the ALUP. Noise reduction measures shall clearly be identified with construction permit applications. Less than significant with mitigation N.6* Development related industrial noise from the WWTP could generate noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Development N-6 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall ensure the WWTP implements noise mitigation systems on all equipment that could generate noise levels in exceedance of the Code levels at nearby receptors. Mitigation systems shall include, but not be limited to, noise barriers and sound walls or buildings. Monitoring of noise levels shall be instituted to ensure that noise levels are below the applicable codes. Follow-up noise mitigation shall be implemented if initial measures are not fully successful in reducing noise levels to below night- time noise levels at the eastern property line. Less than significant with mitigation AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES (Section 4.10) AE.2 The County Development Plan component of the Project would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Development AE-2 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall ensure that all development projects are reviewed for consistency with the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan, the County General plan design guidelines. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AE.3 The Project would generate a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Development AE-3 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan and lighting operation schedule for review and approval. The lighting plan shall demonstrate that direct views of light sources are shielded from nearby residences. The lighting schedule shall describe the number, location and amounts of lights, and the proposed hours of operation for the entire property. The lighting schedule shall propose the minimum number of lights, level of illumination, and hours of operation allowed by County codes and ordinances. The approved lighting schedule shall become a required condition of the lease between the property owner and any tenant on the Project Site. Less than significant with mitigation AE.4* The wastewater treatment facility would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Development AE.4 Implement mitigation measure AE-2 following the County design guidelines. Less than significant with mitigation HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.6 Potential health risk from exposure to residual contamination following site cleanup and development. Development HM-6 Prior to recordation of applicable tract map, the Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels identifying specific limits on trenching activities and procedures for conducting subsurface construction activities. The Applicant shall maintain responsibility for air quality monitoring during any subsurface excavation activities. Less than significant with mitigation HM.8 Potential risk associated with the future use of acutely hazardous materials in the Development HM-8 The Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels limiting on- site storage of AHMs to amounts less than the reportable quantities as currently defined in California Health and Safety Code §2770.5, California Accidental Release Program (CalARP) List of Substances, and California Code of Regulations 5189, Process Safety Management of Acutely Hazardous Materials, Appendix A. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS II Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Impacts that must be addressed in Findings that the mitigation measures would reduce the level of impact to insignificant in accordance with Sections 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines) Impact Impact Description Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact SLOCRA safety areas . HM.10* Risk associated with chemical spills due to aircraft strikes for both the direct discharge and polishing pond wastewater treatment facility WWTF) options. Development HM-10 Prior to recordation of applicable tract map, the Applicant shall include deed restrictions on the WWTF parcel limiting on-site storage of reportable quantities of chlorine and sulfur dioxide, and requiring the use of alternative chemicals that are not classified as acutely hazardous materials, or other non-chemical technologies in order to achieve tertiary treatment of wastewater. Less than significant with mitigation HM.11* Risk associated with polishing ponds WWTP option could affect aircraft bird strikes. Development HM-11 Polishing ponds shall not be allowed as part of the design of the WWTF unless the applicant can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the County, that engineering methods are available and can be incorporated in the polishing pond design that would ensure no increase in bird or other wildlife populations on the site will result from the construction and operation of the polishing pond. Such measures could include, but not be limited to covers over the ponds, special netting, and hazing devices. Less than significant with mitigation Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact AIR QUALITY (Section 4.1) AQ.5 Construction activities associated with the County Development Plan would generate emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development Fugitive dust mitigation measures (see impact AQ.2) would be applicable to this phase of the Project as per SLOAPCD requirements. Less than significant AQ.9 Operational activities associated with the County Development Plan would generate CO emissions that produce localized CO Hot Spots. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant AQ.10 Operational activities associated with the County Development Plan would generate diesel PM emissions that produce localized, elevated cancer impacts. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Section 4.2) BIO.12* The County Development Plan, specifically the use County Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact of groundwater, would result in impacts to wetland areas and VPFS by drawing down surface water levels. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION (Section 4.3) T.2 The addition of traffic generated by the Project would cause one intersection to operate at unacceptable levels under Existing plus Project conditions. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant WATER RESOURCES (Section 4.5) WR.6 Paving and development could result in changes to surface water flows thereby increasing surface water runoff from the Project Site. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant WR.7 Flooding of development structures or redirection of flood flows could occur if buildings are built within the 100-year flood Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact plain. GEOLOGICAL AND SOIL RESOURCES (Section 4.7) GR.2 Seismically induced ground shaking could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, potentially resulting in loss of property or risk to human health and safety. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant GR.3 Existing uncertified fill on- site could be subject to hydroconsolidation excessive settlement, expansive soil shrink and swell, and differential settlement and expansion, and thus could damage proposed facilities, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant GR.6 Construction and improvement in areas lacking Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact suitable factors of safety for existing slopes could result in gross or surficial instability, as well as earthquake- induced landslides, which could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. NOISE AND VIBRATION (Section 4.8) N.4 Off-site County Development Plan related traffic would generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Section 4.11) HM.7 Potential risk associated with development within the SLOCRA safety areas. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant HM.9 Risk associated with land use changes and aircraft wildlife Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact strikes and other aircraft hazards. HM.12* Potential public risk associated with development within the SLOCRA Safety Areas. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant POPULATION AND HOUSING (Section 4.12) P/H.3* The County Development Plan may induce substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. It should be noted that the County Development Plan would develop commercial facilities greater than 5,000 sq. ft., requiring payment of Inclusionary Housing Impact fees or land donation to satisfy the requirements. As a result, The Applicant would be required to satisfy the inclusionary housing requirement by: (1) construction of employee housing or inclusionary housing units, whether located on-site or off-site; (2) payment of housing impact fees; or (3) donation of land. The housing impact fees are $2.11 per square foot for commercial/retail land uses, $2.46 per square foot for commercial services/offices land uses, and $0.98 per square foot for industrial/warehouse land uses. If employee housing or inclusionary housing would be provided in-lieu of fee payments, the total fee amount must be calculated. Less than significant PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES (Section 4.13) PS/U.10* Build-out of the County Development Plan could increase demand for fire protection services. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant PS/U.11* Build-out of the County Development Plan would create an incrementally higher demand for Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact police protection services. PS/U.12* Construction and operation of the County Development Plan could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Development PS/U-12a If additional electrical or natural gas energy infrastructure is required to accommodate the proposed Project, the Applicant would be required to pay a fee to PG&E or SCG respectively, to provide additional service. PS/U-12b To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. PS/U-12c The Applicant shall comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with all adopted policies of the County General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element regarding energy consumption such as: a. Incorporating cost-effective, renewable, energy resources into the Project; b. Providing passive features through site design that allows shade to reduce unwanted heat gain, thereby reducing the need to use energy for cooling; and, c. Installation of energy efficient appliances, heat recovery equipment, and building energy management systems. Less than significant PS/U.13* Construction and operation of the County Development Plan could generate significant amounts of solid waste. Development PS/U-13a To maintain a diversion rate of at least 50 percent of construction waste from reaching the landfill, a Recycling Plan for the proposed Project is to be implemented during construction. The plan shall be submitted to the County Public Works Department for approval prior to permit issuance, as well as ongoing documentation from the Applicant that demonstrates compliance with the plan. Information to be included in this plan may consist of the following: a. The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan. b. A brief description of the proposed Project wastes to be generated, Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project. c. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map. d. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site-separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility). e. The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled. f. A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan. g. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume). h. Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection shall report on a quarterly basis. i. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. j. Recycling information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. k. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. PS/U-13b To achieve the minimum 50 percent reduction in solid waste disposal during the Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan December 2013 IST-3-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS III Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Plan Adverse but Not Significant Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact ongoing operations of the County Development Plan as required by AB 939, the Project shall provide a plan for the disposal, storage, and collection of solid waste material for the Project. This plan shall include the provision of adequate space for recyclable collection bins as well as the timely collection of recyclable material. The development of the plan shall be coordinated with the County’s franchised solid waste collection and disposal firm, San Luis Obispo Garbage. AGRICULTURE (Section 4.15) AR.4 The County Development Plan would result in the conversion of farmland or grazing land to non-agricultural uses. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Less than significant AR.5 The City Development Plan would involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non- agricultural use. Development AR-5 The Applicant shall design the development for the Northwest Operations Area such that the buildings are located near the eastern edge of the parcel. This mitigation measure would not apply if the agricultural property adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area has received entitlements from the City to develop the property prior to development of the Northwest Operations Area. Less than significant Impact Summary Tables-County Development Plan Chevron Tank Farm IST-3-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CLASS IV Impacts – Proposed Project – County Development Scenario Beneficial Impacts Impact Description of Impact Project Phase Mitigation Measures Residual Impact RECREATION (Section 4.14) REC.3* The Project would increase the County’s recreational acreage stock with 15 acres of sports fields, as well as Class I and Class II bicycle lanes, while not adding residential development. Development No mitigation measures are required since the impact is beneficial. Beneficial 1.0 Introduction Chevron Tank Farm 1-1 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 1.0 Introduction The Chevron Land and Development Company (the Applicant), on behalf of the land owner, the Union Oil Company of California (Union Oil), is proposing a remediation and development project on the 332-acre former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm property (Project Site), located south of the City of San Luis Obispo (City), in San Luis Obispo County (County), California. The location of the property is shown in Figure 1-1. The Project Site was originally owned and operated by Union Oil, which reorganized during the 1980s to become the Unocal Corporation (Unocal). The San Luis Obispo Tank Farm was constructed on the Project Site in 1910 to serve as the accumulation point for the petroleum pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. The Tank Farm was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s it was formally decommissioned. Chevron purchased Unocal, including the Project Site, in August 2005. The Project Site currently exists as primarily vacant land that borders commercial and industrial development to both the east and west. The San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA) is located to the southeast, and agricultural and scattered commercial development exists to the south of the Project Site. Chevron proposes to remediate the Project Site to address site contamination issues and manage identified human health and ecological risks, and develop portions of the Project Site based on the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP). The Project Site is located within the County, but is surrounded by the City and is considered under the City’s sphere of influence, as described in the aforementioned AASP. The Applicant is proposing a Development Agreement for consideration by the City Council in association with a potential annexation of the Project Site by the City. Given the potential uncertainty of the Development Agreement and annexation processes, Chevron has filed a land division map application with both the County and City. As such, Chevron is proposing two separate development options, one consistent with County regulations and one consistent with City regulations. The objective of this dual approach is to provide an alternative development option in the event the review and approval process for annexation and development with the City is unsuccessful. Future development would either be under County or City jurisdiction, following approval of amendments, since the proposed Project would require modifications to both the County General Plan and the City’s AASP. 1.0 Introduction December 2013 1-2 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 1-1 Location of the Project Site 1.0 Introduction Chevron Tank Farm 1-3 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City and County have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) concerning each jurisdiction’s role in this process. Pursuant to that MOU, the City and County have agreed to act as co-Lead Agencies for purposes of preparing this Environmental Impact Report (EIR). For purposes of ultimately certifying a Final EIR, the City will act as Lead Agency and the County will act as Responsible Agency. In the event that, in acting on any portion of the Project and considering whether to certify the Final EIR, the City declines to certify the Final EIR for any reason, the County will act as Lead Agency for purposes of acting on any portion of the Project and for certifying the Final EIR. Chevron is proposing to phase Project-related work to include remediation, restoration, and pre- development grading of the Project Site while under County jurisdiction, and development and construction once the Project Site is annexed to the City if a Development Agreement can be reached and the Project is approved by the City. This Final EIR evaluates the remediation component of the Project, which would occur under County jurisdiction, as well as both the City and County Development Plans with suitable alternatives. Information for the remediation and Development Plans is based on the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (AVOCET 2007), the Project Execution Plan (Chevron 2007), and Chevron’s responses to the EIR preparer’s information requests. The remediation proposal was developed as a result of an extensive collaborative process with resources agencies that have provided input to Chevron’s proposed remediation design in light of the proposed future uses at the Project Site. Chevron entered into two cooperative programs that included regulatory agency participation and third-party expert review. The first of these collaborative processes was the Remediation Technology Panel (RTP), established through a cooperative agreement between Chevron and the Regional Water Quality Control Board RWQCB). The second, the Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team (SERRT), was established in 2002. The SERRT formed two subgroups, the Human Health Risk Working Group (HHRWG) and the Ecological Risk Working Group (ERWG). Both groups included Chevron, its representatives and consultants, and the RWQCB. In addition, the HHRWG included representatives from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Division, and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). The ERWG included representatives from the City of San Luis Obispo, the San Luis Obispo County Planning Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). These groups provide input and review as part of the development of the RAP. As part of the remediation component of the Project, Chevron has also included a number of Project design features to address anticipated issues. These design features are included as part of Chapter 2.0, Project Description and have been evaluated for efficacy as part of the environmental review in each of the pertinent issue areas. The goals of the EIR are to provide the public and decision makers with detailed information about the remediation and current and future development at the Project Site, in order to determine what types of environmental impacts could result from the remediation process and 1.0 Introduction December 2013 1-4 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR these activities, review alternatives, and suggest mitigation measures for any potential impacts that could be incorporated into the permitting process for the resulting Project. 1.1 Proposed Project Objectives Pursuant to Section 15124(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the description of the proposed Project is to contain “a clearly written statement of objectives” that will aid the lead agency in developing a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate in the EIR, will aid decision makers in preparing findings and, if necessary, a statement of overriding considerations. Project objectives should include the underlying purpose of the Project. The overall goal for the Project is to remediate areas of contamination, amend applicable City or County planning documents, annex the site into City jurisdiction, and to develop approximately 800,000 square feet of building space. This would be achieved through the following objectives: 1. Improve the ecological function of the various habitats on the Project Site. 2. Ensure that human health risks are within acceptable levels for the proposed land uses. 3. Reduce ecological risks to acceptable levels while minimizing environmental impacts of remediation activities. 4. Meet the objectives of the RWQCB and the SERRT. 5. Develop an economically viable commercial project with infrastructure and development phased over 25 years. 6. Provide a majority of the property as restricted open space that includes bikes trails and other forms of public use on portions of the property, while protecting sensitive ecological resources. 7. Meet major goals of the City’s General Plan and AASP (City Development Plan). 8. Meet major goals of the County’s General Plan (County Development Plan). 9. Ensure consistency with Airport Land Use Plan. 10. Enhance the development potential and attractiveness of the Project Site. 11. To generate new job opportunities for the community and contribute to the fiscal well-being of the City. 12. Minimize environmental impacts of grading activities by completing preliminary rough grading concurrent with remediation activities. The City’s and County’s goals for the Project are to address the environmental degradation of the Project Site, and to enhance the natural habitat as an ecological preserve. In addition, the plan should help bring vitality to the area with a new business park and light industrial uses with a more contemporary and diversified economy including the potential for more head of household jobs. The Project should also help support airport operations and build upon the existing compact development patterns. 1.0 Introduction Chevron Tank Farm 1-5 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 1.2 Agency Use of the Document The City and County determined that an EIR for the proposed Project, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, was needed in order to proceed with permitting. Section 15124(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR contain a statement within the project description briefly describing the intended uses of the EIR. The CEQA Guidelines indicate that the EIR should identify the ways in which the lead agency and any responsible agencies would use this document in their approval or permitting processes. The City will serve as Lead Agency and the County will serve as Responsible Agency. The City and County will use the document as part of their decision-making process in permitting the components of the Project within their respective jurisdictions. This EIR is consistent with Section 15120-15132 of the CEQA Guidelines which sets forth requirements for contents of EIRs. Based upon the environmental impact analysis of the proposed Project, a number of measures have been developed to mitigate the identified impacts associated with the proposed Project and Project alternatives. The City or County may incorporate the mitigation measures identified in the EIR, where applicable, as conditions of approval in project entitlements which may be granted for the Project. The environmental impact analysis will be used by the public and decision makers to help understand the scope of the Project and the associated environmental effects. The remainder of this section provides a summary of how the key agencies will use this document. A detailed discussion of permits needed for the proposed Project is included at the end of Section 2.0, Project Description. 1.2.1 Local and Regional The County will use this EIR as part of its decision-making process in evaluating the proposed Conditional Use Permit for the remediation component of the Project, and the potential General Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map, and Conditional Use Permits that would be required for the development component of the Project if it was to occur within the County. Similarly, the City will use the EIR as part of its decision-making process in evaluating the AASP and General Plan Amendments, Tentative Tract Map approval, and annexation that would be required for the development portion of the Project if it were to occur within the City. The San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Division is a California Environmental Protection Agency Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the entire County. The CUPA oversees all programs associated with hazardous materials. Inclusive in these programs is the reporting of unauthorized releases of hazardous materials, within the Proposition 65 requirements. The County Environmental Health Department is a responsible agency that may use the EIR to obtain additional information on the proposed Project for changes in the Hazardous Waste Generator and Business Plan, as well as well construction and deconstruction permits that may be needed for the proposed Project. The SLOAPCD is the agency responsible for issuance of a Permit to Construct (PTC) and a Permit to Operate (PTO), both of which may be required for the Project. To fulfill its obligations 1.0 Introduction December 2013 1-6 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR as a responsible agency, the SLOAPCD will rely on information contained in this EIR as part of any PTC/PTO permitting process. The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) could use this document as part of their annexation approval process. The San Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Commission could use this document as part of their review of the AASP and Airport Compatibility Open Space Plan ACOS) amendments, as well as their consistency review of the Project with the Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP). 1.2.2 State The RWQCB will use the EIR for decision-making regarding the approval of the RAP that will be used to execute the cleanup of the Project Site. The RWQCB is also the agency responsible for providing a Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the Project. The RWQCB will use the EIR in its review of the Project in relation to the Water Quality Certification. 1.2.3 Federal The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the agency responsible for issuing a dredge and fill permit for Federal Wetlands and Waters of the United States. Some of the construction activities may require a permit from the USACE. The USACE may use the EIR in its review of the Project, to determine what if any permits are required for the Project. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is the agency responsible for assuring compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Some of the construction activities could impact species listed under the ESA. This may require consultation with the USFWS. The USFWS may use the EIR in its review of the Project, to determine what if consultation is required for the Project. 1.3 Previous Studies and Reports A large number of studies and reports have been developed by the Applicant in order to help develop their proposed remediation plan and subsequent development concept. The relevant studies are listed below with a brief description of their respective purpose and scope. These reports were used by the Applicant to develop and support their applications to the City and County, and have been peer-reviewed as part of this EIR. Biological Surveys. Phase I (2003), II (2003), III (2004), Red Legged Frog (2008 and 2012) and Burrowing Owl (2008). Biological surveys were conducted in phases in support of an ecological risk assessment (ERA) for the Project Site. The surveys focus on aquatic invertebrates, benthic invertebrates, and special status plant and animal species. Phase I surveys for special status vertebrate species included California tiger salamander (CTS), California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii [CRLF]), and black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis). The Phase II surveys describe the results of dry season surveys for the federal-listed vernal pool fairy shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi [VPFS]) and initial surveys for Morro shoulderband snail (Helminthoglypta walkeriana 1.0 Introduction Chevron Tank Farm 1-7 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR MSS]). The Phase III report presents results of follow-up surveys for MSS and winter bird surveys. The additional survey report described focused surveys conducted for the federal-listed threatened CRLF and the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), a California Species of Special Concern. Botanical Resources Surveys. December, 2008. This report describes comprehensive botanical surveys conducted at the Project Site. Landscape Restoration Plan. January, 2009. This plan contains a description of the Project Site’s biological characteristics and a detailed analysis of site hydrology. Four primary objectives were identified for this Plan: (1) identification of wetlands subject to federal jurisdiction; (2) completion of a hydrogeomorphic assessment; (3) preparation of a botanical inventory and report; and (4) development of restoration alternatives. The Plan also considers mitigation for impacts to upland habitats, rare plants, and the federally-listed VPFS. Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA). March 2013. This study and report evaluated potential human health risks at the Project Site using current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) methodologies. Risks determined in the HHRA are driven by the presence of arsenic, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzo(a)pyrene in soil. This risk assessment was prepared in accordance with, and follows the procedures and methodologies described in guidance documents from the Cal/EPA and USEPA. The characterization of petroleum hydrocarbons at the Project Site and the evaluation of potential human health risks were addressed through a collaborative process among SERRT members. The HHRA followed a single-text approach for addressing technical issues, in which a single text is revised from initial versions (versions 1.x) through final accepted versions (2.0 and higher). Participants in the collaborative process reviewed and commented on the different versions. The SERRT then ratified a final version of this document in May 2004. Based upon work done as part of the EIR process, the HHRA was updated and a final version of the document was issued in March 2013 that has been approved by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the San Luis Obispo County Department of Environmental Health. Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA). 2004. This study quantified the risks to the ecological environment of selected, existing site contamination. The primary objective was to provide a screening-level evaluation of potential ecological risks associated with the Project Site using the existing site data and site characterization reports. The quantitative and qualitative analyses in this ERA reflect the consensus decisions of the ERWG. Risk Management Study. December, 2005. The primary objective of this report was to provide recommendations from the SERRT to agencies and Chevron for management of ecological risk throughout the Project Site. Secondarily, the report provides a summary of the various efforts by members of the ERWG to reduce the uncertainty identified in the pERA. This document was ratified by the SERRT on December 12, 2005. Feasibility Study (FS). March, 2007. The purpose of this study is to evaluate various remedial alternatives that address the contamination issues at the Project Site, and to select a preferred remedy. Remedial action objectives (RAOs) were developed in the Feasibility Study with the 1.0 Introduction December 2013 1-8 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR intent to protect human health and the environment in ways that are consistent with, and based upon, the results of the human and ecological risk assessments. In order to accomplish this, the site was divided into five Operable Units (OUs), some with subordinate Areas of Concern AOCs), based on physical and chemical considerations as well as location and anticipated future use. RAOs and General Response Actions (GRAs) designed to achieve the RAOs were identified, remedial alternatives were proposed for each OU, and then preferred alternatives were selected. The findings of the SERRT and RTP processes, together with numerous site characterization and guidance documents, constitute the framework of the Feasibility Study process; that is, identifying impacts of concern and evaluating potential remedial alternatives. Project Execution Plan. December, 2007. This plan describes how the Applicant’s overall remediation and development objectives were conceived and developed and the methods that will be used to achieve them. The document also describes the character and extent of petroleum contamination, the proposed remediation actions, and the long-term monitoring and inspection protocols that would be used at the Project Site. The document also describes various measures the Applicant proposed to use to avoid or minimize environmental impacts during Project implementation. Measures specific to protection of biological resources (e.g. populations of rare plants) are also provided. Remedial Action Plan (RAP). December, 2007. The intent of the RAP is to provide detailed information on how the preferred remedial alternative from the Feasibility Study would be implemented. The RAP contains multiple references to human health, ecological risk, and occupational health that are reviewed and evaluated in the plan. The RAP presents the basis for the portion of Section 2.0, Project Description related to the remediation of the Project Site. Chevron worked with the various agencies to develop this plan under the various collaborative processes described above, resulting in this consensus document. Nevertheless, approvals and permits must be granted by the agencies independent of the cooperative process. 1.4 EIR Process and Scope This EIR was prepared in accordance with State, City, and County administrative guidelines established to comply with CEQA. Section 15151 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the following standards for EIR adequacy: An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR should summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have looked not for perfection; but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure. The City and County have determined that the Project needs environmental review in the form of an EIR pursuant to CEQA instead of a categorical or statutory exemption, or a Negative Declaration. Under CEQA, “The purpose of an environmental impact report is to identify the 1.0 Introduction Chevron Tank Farm 1-9 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR significant effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the proposed project, and to indicate the manner in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided” (PRC Section 21002.1[a]). An EIR is the most comprehensive form of environmental documentation identified in CEQA and provides the information needed to assess the environmental consequences of a proposed project. EIRs are intended to provide an objective, factually supported, full-disclosure analysis of the environmental consequences associated with a proposed project that has the potential to result in significant, adverse environmental impacts. In compliance with State CEQA Guidelines, the City, as the Lead Agency, with assistance from the County prepared a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed Project and solicited comments through distribution of the NOP. A public scoping meeting was held in the community on July 29, 2009 to provide an opportunity for the public to comment on the scope of the EIR. The NOP and comments received in response to the NOP were used to direct the scope of the analysis and the technical studies in this EIR. A copy of the NOP and the comments received are in Appendix I of the EIR. Additional public comments will be received as part of the Draft EIR issuance and 45-day public comment period. During this period, meetings will be held to discuss the Draft EIR and take comments on the document. Based upon the comments received, changes will be made for the Final EIR. Areas where the Final EIR has been changed will be marked on the side of the page with a vertical line. All comments received on the Draft EIR and their corresponding responses will be provided in the Final EIR. This Draft EIR identifies the environmental impacts of the proposed Project on the existing environment, indicates how any significant impacts can be mitigated or avoided, and identifies and evaluates alternatives to the proposed Project. This document is intended to provide the City, County, responsible agencies, and the public with information necessary to understand and evaluate the environmental effect of the proposed Project as part of the decision-making process. The CEQA Guidelines require that a lead agency shall neither approve nor implement a project as proposed unless the significant environmental impacts have been reduced to an acceptable level. An acceptable level is defined as eliminating, avoiding, or substantially lessening significant environmental effects to below a level of significance. If the lead agency approves the Project even though significant impacts identified in the Final EIR cannot be fully mitigated, the lead agency must state, in writing, the reasons for its action. In these circumstances, Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be included in the record of project approval and mentioned in the Notice of Determination. The Draft EIR was released on June 20, 2013 for a 45-day public comment period. During the public comment period a number of public workshops were held on the Draft EIR to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions about the Draft EIR. Volume II of the FEIR contains a copy of all of the comment letters received on the Draft EIR and the responses to those comments. Volume II is provided in electronic format on the CD attached to the inside front cover of the FEIR. Revision marks are used throughout this FEIR to show where changes have been made to the DEIR. Areas where the text has been revised is shown by solid vertical lines on the left margin of the page. 1.0 Introduction December 2013 1-10 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 1.5 EIR Contents The FEIR is in three volumes. The first volume is the FEIR. The second volume is the response to comments, and the third is the FEIR appendices. Volumes II and III are only available in electronic format (see CD attached to the inside front cover if you are reviewing a hard copy of the FEIR Volume I. Volume I of the FEIR is organized as follows: Executive Summary – Provides an overview of the proposed Project, and a summary of the significant impacts and associated mitigation measures identified for the Project. Impact Summary Table – Provides a summary of the identified impacts for the proposed Project. The table also provides a summary of identified mitigation measures for each impact. 1.0 Introduction – Provides an overview of the proposed Project evaluated in the EIR and a summary of the objectives for the Project. The chapter also discusses agency use of the document, and provides a summary of the contents of the EIR. 2.0 Proposed Project Description – Provides the background of the Project, including a history of the area and a detailed description of the proposed Project including remediation, restoration, and development proposals within the City and the County. The chapter also contains a table describing the potential permit actions, and governmental agencies and their jurisdiction for those entitlements needed for the Project to proceed. 3.0 Cumulative Projects Description – Provides a description of the projects that have been included in the cumulative analysis. The cumulative analysis contained in this document covers the cumulative impacts of reasonably foreseeable projects located in the vicinity of the proposed Project. 4.0 Analysis of Environmental Issues – Describes the existing conditions found at the Project Site and vicinity, and assesses the potential environmental impacts that could occur if the proposed Project is implemented. These potential impacts are compared to various “Thresholds of Significance” (or significance criteria) to determine the severity of the impacts. Mitigation measures intended to reduce significant impacts are identified where feasible. This chapter also discusses cumulative impacts. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis – The first part of this chapter presents a description of various alternatives to the proposed Project. This is followed by an alternative screening analysis that was used to identify alternatives that could reduce significant impacts associated with the proposed Project, and to eliminate alternatives from further consideration. The third section provides the environmental analysis of the selected alternatives. The next section summarizes the environmental advantages and disadvantages associated with the proposed Project and the alternatives. This is followed by a discussion of the environmentally superior alternative. 6.0 Other CEQA Mandated Sections – Discusses the significant irreversible environmental changes that could occur if the proposed Project is implemented. The 1.0 Introduction Chevron Tank Farm 1-11 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR chapter also discusses the spatial, economic, and/or population growth impacts that may result from the proposed Project, as well as energy conservation. The Final EIR also contains a number of appendices that support the EIR and the analysis in the EIR. These appendices include the following: Appendix A – Project Description Information A.1-Remedial Action Plan (Applicant Prepared) A.2-Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Feasibility Assessment (Applicant Prepared) A.3-Other Figures and Drawings (Applicant Prepared) Appendix B – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases B.1-Air and Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations and Methodology B.2-Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report (Applicant Prepared) Appendix C – Biological Resources C.1-Phase I Biological Resources Studies (Applicant Prepared) C.2-Phase II Biological Resources Studies (Applicant Prepared) C.3-Phase III Biological Resources Studies (Applicant Prepared) C.4-Comprehensive Fairy Shrimp Wet and Dry Season Survey Reports (Applicant Prepared) C.5-Protocol-Level California Red-Legged Frog Survey Report (Applicant Prepared) C.6-Burrowing Owl Survey Report (Applicant Prepared) C.7-Description and Analysis of the Botanical Resources at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility (Applicant Prepared) C.8-An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the US (Applicant Prepared) C.9-Operational Guidebook to Assessment of the Riverine Waters/Wetland Functions Applicant Prepared) C.10-Santa Fe Road Realignment Biological Assessment C.11-Biological Resource Survey Letter-Report for the Off-Site Flower Mound Impact Area (Applicant Prepared) C.12- 75% Basis of Design Report- Landscape Restoration (Applicant Prepared) C.13- 90-Day VPFS 2012 Report (Applicant Prepared) C.14- California Red-Legged Frog 2012 Survey Report (Applicant Prepared) C.15- Wetland Disturbance Calculations Memo (Applicant Prepared) Appendix D – Traffic Analysis Report Appendix E – Preliminary Policy Consistency Analysis Appendix F – Hydrology Study (Applicant Prepared) Appendix G – Water Supply Assessment Reports G.1-City of San Luis Obispo Water Supply Assessment G.2-County Development Project Water Supply Assessment G.3-Former Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Proposed Development-Use of Groundwater as a Source of Potable Water Appendix H – Risk Assessment Documents H.1-Tank Farm Human Health Risk Assessment (Applicant Prepared) 1.0 Introduction December 2013 1-12 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR H.2-Letter from Agency on Adequacy of Human Health Risk Assessment H.2-Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (Applicant Prepared) H.3-Report on Shallow Soil Assessment Activities for Arsenic, Northeast of Reservoir 2, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm (Applicant Prepared) H.4-Arsenic Assessment (Applicant Prepared) Appendix I – Notice of Preparation (NOP) and NOP Comment Letters Appendix J – List of Mitigation Measures Appendix K – Draft Mitigation Monitoring Plan Appendix L – List of EIR Preparers Appendix M – Persons and Agencies Contacted Appendix N – List of Abbreviations and Acronyms The appendices are voluminous, and are therefore provided in electronic format on the CD attached to the inside front cover of the EIR notebook. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.0 Project Description Chevron Land and Development Company (the Applicant), on behalf of the land owner, the Union Oil Company of California (Union Oil), is proposing a remediation and development Project on the 332-acre former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm property (Project Site), located south of the City of San Luis Obispo (City), in San Luis Obispo County (County), California. The location of the property is shown in Figure 2-1. The remainder of this section provides background on the Project, and a detailed description of the proposed Project activities. 2.1 Background The Project Site was originally owned and operated by Union Oil. Chevron purchased Union Oil, including the Project Site, in August 2005. The San Luis Obispo Tank Farm was constructed on the property in 1910 to serve as the accumulation point for the petroleum pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. In 1926, many of the tanks on the Project Site were destroyed in a fire created by a lightning strike. The Tank Farm was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s it was formally decommissioned. The Project Site now exists as primarily vacant land that is surrounded by the expanding footprint of urban development of the City, and the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA). The Applicant intends to remediate the Project Site to address site contamination issues, restore habitat, and develop portions of the Project Site consistent with a proposed land use plan. The Project consists of two principal components: remediation and development. The remediation component includes several remediation and restoration activities that are proposed to occur over a three- year period: demolition of existing buildings, excavation of soil, site re- contouring, capping, and increasing the quantity of wetland and rare plant habitats. Re- contouring would be done mostly using on-site materials. The remediation portion of the Project is based on an extensive collaborative process with resource agencies that have concurred with the Applicant’s proposed remediation approach, while taking into consideration the proposed future uses at the Project Site. The Applicant has also proposed a number of design and operational features as part of the Project in order to address various issues. These design and operational features are included as part of this Project Description, as appropriate. The second component of the Project involves development of approximately 17 percent of the Project Site with approximately 800,000 square feet (floor area) of business park and service commercial uses. Development would be implemented in five phases over a period of approximately 25 years; each phase would create approximately 160,000 square feet of leasable floor area and take approximately five years to construct. To achieve the development, the Applicant requested amendments to the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) and the County’s General Plan. The proposal also includes designation of approximately 15 acres for recreational use (may include up to two acres of public land) to be developed by a subsequent Project Site/individual lot owner. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-1 Project Location 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Project Site is included in the City’s AASP that anticipates future annexation of this and other properties in the area given its proximity to existing City boundaries, existing industrial uses, and the SLOCRA. In addition, the City’s AASP encourages the environmentally sensitive portions of the Project Site – comprised of approximately 250 acres – be kept in open space. The Applicant has submitted an application to the City for the proposed development including amendments to the AASP. The Applicant is proposing a Development Agreement (DA) for consideration by the City Council in association with a potential annexation of the Project Site. Although the Applicant prefers annexation to the City and developing the Project Site as part of the AASP, it recognizes the uncertain nature of this process. Therefore, the Applicant has also filed for a General Plan Amendment (LRP2008-00001) and Tentative Tract/Conditional Use Permit (SUB2008-00004) application with the County, which the Applicant will pursue in the event that the City review and approval process for annexation and development is unsuccessful. Approved development would either be under County or City jurisdiction, and such approvals would follow approval of required amendments to the County General Plan and/or the City’s AASP. Both development options are analyzed in an equal level of detail in this environmental impact report (EIR ) to allow for full consideration of the environmental impacts of both options, and to allow the County to rely on this document should the Project remain under the jurisdiction of the County. Chevron Environmental Management Company (CEMC) is the Applicant for the remediation and restoration component of the Project. Chevron Land and Development (CL&D) is the Applicant for the proposed land planning and development component. Both companies are located at 276 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo. This EIR evaluates the remediation component of the Project including the restoration plan, and both the City and County Development Plans. Information for the remediation and development components is based on the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (AVOCET 2007), the Project Execution Plan (Chevron 2007), and Applicant’s responses to the EIR preparer’s information requests. The remainder of this Project Description includes a depiction of the existing Project Site and present contamination; a detailed description of the proposed remediation design, including the Applicant-proposed design and operational features; and descriptions of the proposed City and the County Development Plans. 2.2 Existing Setting Information The Project Site is located at 276 Tank Farm Road, which is immediately south of the City of San Luis Obispo, in San Luis Obispo County, California (see Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2). The County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers for the Project Site are 076-352-061, 076-352-062, 076-381- 021, 076-382-005, 076-383-001, and 076-383-002. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-2 Project Site Note: The Flower Mound borrow site extends outside the proposed development site boundary. Source: RAP AVOCET 2007; MRS 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Project Site is divided into north and south sections by Tank Farm Road (see Figure 2-2). It is bordered by light commercial and industrial development to the east and west, the SLOCRA to the southeast, agricultural and pastoral lands with scattered residences to the south, and a mobile home park to the northeast. Residential development is currently under construction to the north of the Project Site. The existing buildings in the northwest portion of the Project Site are currently used as the Applicant’s local offices for a variety of environmental and remediation operations. These buildings are proposed for demolition as part of the Project. 2.2.1 Historical Use From 1910 until the early 1980s, the Project Site stored crude oil transported from the San Joaquin Valley via pipeline. Storage facilities at the Project Site included six large earthen reservoirs, ranging in capacity between 775,000 and 1,350,000 barrels (bbl) [32,550,000 and 56,700,000 gallons], and 21 steel aboveground storage tanks, each with a capacity of 55,000 bbl 2,310,000 gallons). In general, the reservoirs (Reservoirs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7), were constructed by excavating a circular or elliptical depression, which was then lined with concrete reinforced with wire mesh. The walls were also made with reinforced concrete, but they were constructed either vertically or integrated into the sloping sides of the depression. The walls and floors of the aboveground storage tanks were constructed of heavy plate steel secured with rivets. The roofs of both the reservoirs and aboveground storage tanks were wood and composite. All together, the Project Site had capacity to store more than 6 million bbl of petroleum. During the course of operations through 1926, six of the aboveground storage tanks were taken out of service and dismantled. On April 7, 1926, a lightning strike ignited a fire at the Project Site. At that time, 933,577 bbl of oil were stored in the aboveground storage tanks, and another 5,374,927 bbl of oil were stored in the reservoirs. The total inventory was 6,308,504 bbl of various grades of oil. Eyewitnesses reported that a lightning strike simultaneously ignited the vapors in Reservoirs 5, 6, and 7. The power of the resulting explosion registered on the Weather Bureau barograph in downtown San Luis Obispo at 7:35 a.m. A second lightning strike ignited Reservoir 3 sometime between 7:50 a.m. and 7:55 a.m. Despite suppression efforts by the facility staff, over the next four days the fire spread to the other reservoirs and to 12 of the then 15 existing steel aboveground storage tanks with a combination of burning embers and boil-overs; the heated oil flowed out of the reservoirs and onto the ground surrounding the tanks. By April 11, 1926, all but a few thousand bbl of the 6 million bbl inventory had been released. Some of this oil burnt to coke and spread across the Project Site. Petroleum coke is defined as a black solid residue, obtained mainly in refineries by cracking (burning) of residue feedstocks. The burning of the heavy oil during the fire had a similar effect to the refining cracking process, creating the coke. This release is considered responsible for most of the numerous surface occurrences (i.e., expressions) of highly weathered and burned petroleum that cover the ground in topographically low areas of the Project Site. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Subsequently, Union Oil (now owned by Chevron) resumed operations at the Project Site, including the reconstruction of ten of the aboveground steel storage tanks, as well as Reservoirs 3, 4, 5, and 6. Reservoirs 2 and 7 were never used again for petroleum storage. The reconstruction effort also included expanding the firebreaks and enlarging the containment areas surrounding the reservoirs, which created numerous hydraulically closed depressions around the Project Site that subsequently became wetlands. The four reservoirs repaired after the 1926 fire continued in service for several more decades, but were progressively decommissioned from the late 1950s through the mid 1970s. Reservoir 2, a 600-foot diameter crude oil storage reservoir, was constructed in 1910. The reservoir had concrete walls and a wooden roof and was surrounded by a roughly trapezoidal berm approximately 15 feet high and 150 feet wide at its base for secondary containment. The 1926 fire left portions of the walls and an asphalt layer over the berm slopes and concrete floor. The reservoir was never rebuilt, however, in the mid 1990s, evidence shows that the concrete floor was ripped by the shank of a bulldozer in perpendicular directions in an attempt to prevent water from accumulating in the former reservoir. Reservoir 3 was similar to Reservoir 2 in size and method of construction, and was also rebuilt after the 1926 fire. Decommissioning of the reservoir concluded in 1961 and involved emptying the reservoir of liquid petroleum and removing the roof and vertical walls. The reinforced concrete covering the sloping sides and bottoms was left in place. Reservoir 3 was largely backfilled by bulldozing the berms into the center of the reservoir. As a result, the floor of the reservoir is estimated to contain between 8 and 11 feet of non-engineered fill material. Reservoir 4 is located on the eastern side of the property just north of Tank Farm Road. It was constructed in an oblong shape measuring approximately 900 feet in the east-west orientation and approximately 300 feet in the north-south orientation. Reservoir 4 decommissioning was similar to Reservoir 3, and involved removing the roof and vertical walls and leaving the reinforced concrete covering the sloping sides and bottom in place. Residual petroleum was removed and the reservoir was backfilled with approximately 5 to 6 feet of non-engineered fill by bulldozing the berms into the center of the reservoir. Decommissioning of this reservoir was concluded by 1976. Reservoirs 5, 6, and 7 were all of similar construction. In each reservoir, the floor and sloping berm walls were lined with reinforced concrete. A small vertical wall at the top of the berm supported a wooden roof covering the entire reservoir. Reservoirs 5 and 6 measured approximately 480 feet in diameter, while Reservoir 7 measured approximately 504 feet in diameter. Decommissioning of Reservoir 5 concluded in 1959 while decommissioning of Reservoir 6 concluded in 1961. Reservoir 7 was not rebuilt after the 1926 fire. In the mid 1990’s the concrete floors of Reservoirs 5 and 7 were ripped using a single shank on a large bulldozer in an attempt to prevent water from accumulating in the former reservoir. To provide access to the interior of Reservoirs 5, 6, and 7 the surrounding berms were breached and pushed inward to form a ramp. Approximately 1.5 feet of non-engineered fill and debris covers the bottom of each reservoir. The bottoms of Reservoirs 5 and 7 are covered by several inches of interlayered tar and organic debris. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR A review of historical aerial photographs shows that the ten aboveground steel storage tanks remaining or rebuilt after the 1926 fire were decommissioned at various times. Aboveground storage tank 522, in the Northwest Operations Area, was removed sometime between 1959 and 1965. Eight of the nine remaining aboveground storage tanks were removed in 1994, and the last aboveground storage tank was reserved for fire water storage. This final aboveground storage tank was removed in August 2000. In addition to the reservoirs and aboveground storage tanks utilized for petroleum storage, the facility included a series of pipelines to move oil to and from the Project Site and between the on-site tanks and facilities. Regional pipeline operations were also conducted at the Project Site, primarily from the Northwest Operations Area (see Figure 2-2). Facilities to support pipeline operations included a pumphouse, boilers (for heating crude oil to reduce viscosity) and an associated blow-down area (a blow-down area is a normal part of the operation of a steam boiler and a blow-down safely depressurizes the system in the event of an emergency), a petroleum physical properties testing laboratory, and an electrical equipment house. The Northwest Operations Area also included areas for general equipment storage and maintenance, as well as underground storage tanks that contained diesel fuel and gasoline (England, Shahin & Associates 1994). The underground storage tanks were removed in 1987. Other historical activities at the Project Site include the operation of a fire training school in the unpaved eastern portion of the Northwest Operations Area. The school consisted of several simulated sumps, flares, and tanks where students practiced techniques for extinguishing petroleum-fed fires. Off-specification gasoline and diesel fuel were fed to these fixtures from a set of three aboveground storage tanks via a system of buried metal pipes. Fire school exercises were suspended at the Project Site in the 1970s. The pumphouse, pipelines, and boilers were taken out of service in the early 1990s and were demolished or decommissioned in the late 1990s. Currently, of the original structures, only three buildings remain. During operations, arsenic-based herbicides were used for weed control. These herbicides were used extensively in the Northwest Operations Area, but may have been used in other areas of the Project Site as well. For several years, approximately two acres of land near the center of the Project Site, north of Tank Farm Road, was leased to a recycling company. The area was used as a transfer station and accumulation point for recyclable materials, such as paper, glass, and aluminum. The operation was shut down and removed in mid 2000, when the lease expired and was not renewed (England Geosystem, Inc. 2001). Lastly, the northeast part of the Project Site was used as a quarry mine, known as the Flower Mound. The Applicant intends to use the gravel and rock material from this former quarry as a source of backfill for the Project. 2.2.2 Current Conditions Aside from the existing office buildings in the northwestern portion of the Project Site, the remains of the petroleum storage facility described above and Tank Farm Road which bisects the site, the Project Site is disturbed, but undeveloped, land that contains native grasslands and both 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR natural wetlands and wetlands resulting from water accumulation in depressions associated with the former oil storage operations (see Figure 2-2). At the Project Site, topography, soils, and vegetation have been altered considerably through plowing and disking, catastrophic fire, grazing of domestic livestock, construction and removal of oil storage tanks and their surrounding berms, stream channelization, construction of water and oil management and containment systems, and several other anthropogenic alterations. Currently, most of the Project Site is dominated by non-native species of forbs and grasses. However, some scrub/shrub and forested plant communities occur in wet depressions or within riparian corridors associated with the east fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries. Waters of the United States (U.S)., including wetlands, in the forms of riverine, depressional, and small slope ecosystems, are prominent throughout the Project Site. Many of the waters/wetlands on the Project Site are associated with natural features such as swales, small riverine channel systems, or depressions. However, some of the depressional and slope wetlands are associated with human-made depressions that remain after decommissioning of oil storage facilities or after various mining or domestic livestock management operations. The most recent wetlands study (WSP, Padre 2008) determined that there are 49 acres of federal wetlands, and 3.9 acres falling under the category of Other Waters of the U.S. present on the Project Site, for a total of 52.9 acres. There are an additional 3.4 acres of “one-parameter” wetlands which are Waters of the State. The disturbed rock outcrop (i.e., former quarry site known as the “Flower Mound”) exists in the northeastern corner of the Project Site and extends off-site to the north and east. It contains a mixture of rock outcrops along the upper slopes and clay-loam soils along the lower slopes. Several areas of the Project Site where surface expressions of petroleum exist have been enclosed with netting to protect birds and other animals from becoming mired in the residual hydrocarbon material 1 Groundwater was also impacted by the previous operations at the Project Site. Petroleum leaked to the subsurface beneath the reservoirs and tanks. The viscosity (i.e., its syrup-like consistency) and the affinity for microbes to use it as a food (also called biodegradation) renders the subsurface petroleum immobile. This condition, sometimes referred to as monitored natural attenuation (MNA), is verified on a semi-annual basis by sampling the groundwater monitoring wells. The Project Site is best characterized as open space, with cattle grazing for fire prevention and weed control. Some modifications and improvements have been made to the Northwest Operations Area since the last petroleum-dedicated aboveground storage tanks were decommissioned in 1994. These included upgrades to the front gate, the addition of a modular office building adjacent to the northernmost original building, a new fire-water tank to replace 1 The residual hydrocarbon material found at portions of the Project Site is a plastic (“sticky”) material, that when exposed on the surface can entrap wildlife. For the remainder of this Chapter this material is referred to as “plastic” hydrocarbons. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR the aboveground water storage tank decommissioned in 2000, and various upgrades to the electrical and telecommunication systems. Utility companies provide natural gas, electricity, and telecommunication service to the Project Site or have lines that cross the Project Site. In 2009, the City installed new sewer infrastructure adjacent to the Project Site. This included a new gravity sewer line along Tank Farm Road, a new lift station adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area and a force main along the west property line connecting the lift station to the City’s wastewater treatment plant. The new pump station replaced two aging stations. Additional new sewer lines were installed along Broad Street between Rockview Place and Tank Farm Road, and on Tank Farm Road at Broad Street. Historical operations at the Project Site were served by approximately 25,125 feet of crude oil pipeline, 47,340 feet of water supply line, and 1,172 feet of other pipeline. Figure 2-3 shows the approximate locations of these lines. It is believed that most of the lines were abandoned in place, although anecdotal reports suggest that much of the pipeline serving the aboveground storage tanks was removed when the tanks were removed. Since there is no record of final cleaning or abandonment procedures, it is presumed that at least some of the lines still contain crude oil. However, the amount of crude oil in the pipelines is unknown. The crude oil pipelines vary in diameter from 8 to 16 inches. Many of the lines are clearly empty where they are exposed on the surface. Nevertheless, any fluid found in the pipelines would be drained prior to removal of the pipelines. Any recovered material would be disposed of consistent with state and federal regulations. Much of the piping remaining from historical operations is found in the Northwest Operations Area, as shown in Figure 2-3. This includes nearly 20 percent of the total crude oil pipe network approximately 4,300 linear feet). This configuration allowed the operators to direct oil in and out of the facility and to transfer oil between the various storage locations as needed. There are also 4,900 feet of water line, 1,120 feet of dedicated Foamite fire-fighting lines, and leach and drain lines totaling slightly less than 1,200 feet. The estimated volume of the crude oil lines in the Northwest Operations Area is approximately 3,260 cubic feet. Over the decades, the SLOCRA was constructed to the southeast of the Project Site. Portions of the Project Site are located beneath the departure pattern for Runway 11-29 of the SLOCRA, which extended Runway 29 by approximately 500 feet in 2001. This modified the airport safety zones beyond those originally considered in the City’s AASP. The current safety zones are shown in Figure 2-4. Additional discussion of the Airport Safety Zones is provided in Section 4.11, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Some airport facilities are located on the Project Site, including an existing unpaved road that provides access to a system of runway lights. The main runway alignment intersects Reservoir 2, which is now a significant feature within the runway protection zone (RPZ). In this same area, there also is an existing paved pad that is accessed from Tank Farm Road through a secured gate. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-3 Project Site Existing Pipelines Source: PEP Padre 2007; MRS 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-4 Airport Safety Zones Source: Modifications to the Airport Land Use Plan for San Luis Obispo County 2005 by the City. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-5 Water Monitoring Wells and Netted Areas Source: LRP Padre 2009; MRS 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Environmental studies prepared subsequent to the City’s AASP provide more detailed information regarding location of contamination and sensitive and endangered species on the Project Site. For example, habitat for the federally-listed vernal pool fairy shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi [VPFS]) was identified in several of the former tank rings to the north of the Northwest Operations Area. To accommodate the various environmental constraints, the Applicant has proposed revisions to the existing AASP that are consistent with these post-AASP studies. The Project Site is accessed from Tank Farm Road. Current deliveries and visits to the Project Site occur sporadically, with an average of one truck per quarter-year to haul debris, visits by contractors two to four times per month to inspect netting enclosures and complete routine maintenance activities, and two persons visiting the Project Site approximately 20 days per year for groundwater, stormwater, and surface water monitoring. Additionally, from 15 to 20 Chevron employees and contractors occupy the offices located in the Northwest Operations Area on a daily basis. Current site activities include environmental monitoring. These activities include an ongoing program to monitor surface water and groundwater. Monitoring activities also include biweekly inspection of the protective netting installed over areas of petroleum surface expressions and maintenance of the netting as needed. Figure 2-5 shows the groundwater monitoring wells and the areas with netting. 2.3 Proposed Remediation Activities The remediation portion of the Project addresses soil and groundwater contamination identified as potential human health or ecological risks as agreed by the resources agencies participating in the Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team (SERRT) process and reviewing the proposed remedial actions for the Project Site. (The SERRT process is discussed further in Section 2.3.1, Regulatory Agency Involvement/Collaborative Process below.) The Project includes restoration of wetland and rare plant habitats affected by the contamination, and those that could be potentially affected by implementing the remedial actions. The petroleum-related material affecting the Project Site includes oil found in the vicinity of the former reservoirs in the subsurface at an average depth of 25 to 40 feet below ground surface (bgs) but as deep as 60 feet. At the surface, crude oil expressions range from solid asphalt-like coke to a low-density (light) non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL). Figure 2-6 shows the locations and nature of the contamination within the Project Site. The following sections describe the elements of the remediation component of the Project, including the involvement of the regulatory agencies in the remediation design; a description of remedial actions to be taken in specific areas of the Project Site; a description of the demolition activities; a depiction of how pipelines would be decommissioned; a description of miscellaneous clean-up; details of the construction methods; a discussion of the schedule; and, a description of the long-term monitoring activities. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-6 Project Site Existing Affected Areas Source: RAP AVOCET 2007; MRS 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.3.1 Regulatory Agency Involvement/Collaborative Process Petroleum released as a result of the 1926 fire, and prior and subsequent Project Site operations have affected the soil and groundwater underlying the Project Site. The Applicant, along with its predecessors, conducted several investigations over the course of nearly two decades to study the soil, groundwater, and surface water conditions at the Project Site to assess the nature and distribution of hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater. These investigations include multiple events of soil, soil gas, surface water, and groundwater sampling; well installation activities; and non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) evaluation. The Applicant has performed analytical testing for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH); benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX); volatile organic compounds (VOC); fuel oxygenates; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH); polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB); pesticides and herbicides; dioxins and furans, metals; arsenic; and, general minerals. In addition to soil and groundwater investigations, the Applicant has conducted field studies focusing on soil gas profiling, natural attenuation, aquifer and product recovery testing, and hydrocarbon seep studies. Specifically, the Applicant’s investigations focused on the nature and occurrence of surface petroleum hydrocarbons present throughout the Project Site, primarily those that are either liquid or display evidence of recent plastic flow. Figure 2-6 shows the petroleum hydrocarbon-containing soil and groundwater and metals-containing soil areas at the Project Site. The Applicant’s characterization of the contamination has included, in addition to their identification and delineation, an evaluation of their importance relative to human and ecological health and the need for their remediation. In order to validate the characterization process, the Applicant entered into two cooperative programs resulting in regulatory agency participation and third-party expert review: the Remediation Technology Panel (RTP) and the SERRT. The first of these collaborative processes, the RTP, was established through a cooperative agreement between the Applicant and the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board RWQCB). The RTP consisted of three experts drawn from academia with expertise in the characterization and remediation of petroleum-affected sites, whose purview focused on soil- and groundwater-related issues. They identified data gaps within the existing site characterization, guided and reviewed subsequent characterization activities, and published a report summarizing their consensus understanding of subsurface issues at the Project Site (RTP 2006). A key finding of that report was that petroleum in the subsurface was effectively immobile and that the migration of dissolved-phase constituents was controlled by natural biodegradation processes. This finding, which was supported by a specific evaluation of natural attenuation processes, formed the basis of evaluating MNA as an appropriate remedial technology for impacted groundwater. The second of the cooperative efforts, the SERRT, was established in 2002 at the suggestion of staff at the RWQCB. This action was suggested in recognition of findings of studies which detailed the extent of sensitive resources on the Project Site, and the subsequent desire to consider a risk-based remediation program for the property. As part of the SERRT process the Applicant, regulatory agencies, and local municipalities have reviewed data, evaluated 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR assessments, identified data gaps, established the risk associated with a given contamination source, and determined the extent of the remediation required for the Project Site. The SERRT formed two subgroups, the Human Health Risk Working Group (HHRWG) and the Ecological Risk Working Group (ERWG). Both groups included the Applicant, its representatives and consultants, and the RWQCB. In addition, the HHRWG included representatives from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Division, and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). The ERWG in addition included representatives from the City, the County Planning Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition to preparing reports documenting the human health risk assessment (HHRA) and predictive ecological risk assessment (pERA), the SERRT prepared a consensus summary document listing its recommendations for risk management at the Project Site, the Risk Management Summary (BBL 2005). In order to focus risk assessment efforts, certain areas of the Project Site, mainly those affected by liquid or plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions, were excluded from the risk assessments on the understanding that remediation of those areas was a must”, and the Applicant would undertake remediation there without the need for further detailed characterization or assessment. The culmination of the Applicant’s characterization efforts was the Risk Management Summary, which identified the contamination at the Project Site requires remediation. The SERRT ratified the Risk Management Summary on December 12, 2005. The Risk Management Summary also provided recommendations on treatment strategies based on levels and types of contamination, the potential ecological risks, and the potential impacts of clean-up. Contamination requiring remediation included surface liquid hydrocarbons impacting seasonal wetlands in Reservoirs 5 and 7, plastic surface hydrocarbons found across the Project Site (mostly in low-lying areas), groundwater affected by LNAPL and benzene, arsenic in soil, asphalt affecting wetlands, and the potential for vapor intrusion to affect buildings. Based upon the Risk Management Summary, a Feasibility Study (FS) was conducted that considered remedial activities that supported development consistent with the land use plans available at that time. The FS evaluated various remedial alternatives that addressed site contamination issues and selected a preferred remedy. The study was ratified by the SERRT on March 15, 2007. The RAP provides regulatory agencies, the municipalities with jurisdiction over the site, and other stakeholders detailed information on how the Applicant plans to implement the preferred remedial alternative from the FS. In addition, a Project Execution Plan was prepared to further describe the Applicant’s proposed implementation of remediation, restoration, development, and permitting for this Project. The following sections describe the contamination areas and the proposed remediation treatment for specific sites. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The EIR preparer has conducted a peer review of all documents submitted by the Applicant to the SERRT in support of its RAP (e.g., pERA, HHRA). The impact analysis sections of this document evaluate the impacts of implementation of the remediation and the potential impacts of leaving some contamination in place under caps as proposed by the Applicant. More recently, as a result of the peer review conducted as part of the preparation of this document, it was determined that additional site assessment was necessary to address concerns that the 1926 fire potentially produced dioxins, which had not been quantitatively characterized previously. Consequently, the Applicant prepared a work plan under the oversight of the SERRT to evaluate the on-site concentrations of dioxins and furans in shallow soils, and to compare those results to off-site ambient sample concentrations to identify whether dioxins generated by the 1926 fire are present in surface soils at the site at concentrations greater than ambient soil conditions. The results of the sampling indicated that dioxin soil concentrations at the Project Site are similar to local ambient concentrations. In addition, the dioxin concentrations of on-site and local ambient samples were determined to be at similar or lower concentrations to benchmark soils at other locations in California. An update to the HHRA report identified data showing two small areas with arsenic analytical results above site background levels. The Applicant conducted additional sampling at the request of the agencies reviewing the HHRA to better define these arsenic exceedances. The sampling results indicated that the top two feet of soil in these small study areas should be removed. 2.3.2 Proposed Remediation Actions Overview Figure 2-7 shows the areas to be addressed as part of the remediation component of the Project. General remedial actions proposed by the Applicant as part of the remediation component of the Project include excavation and off-site transport, capping, long-term monitoring, and institutional controls. Brief descriptions of these general types of actions are detailed below. Detailed descriptions of their application to specific environmental issues are found in Section 2.3.3. 2.3.2.1 Excavation Some affected near-surface soils, mostly those affected by petroleum with the risk of wildlife entrapment, are proposed to be excavated. The excavation would remove material to RAP- specified excavation depths (e.g., two feet) or down to the exposure of some existing feature e.g., a former reservoir bottom). Field investigations conducted for the Applicant have shown that the isolated pockets of plastic hydrocarbon identified for removal are residual oil from the fire or operational spills and appear to be localized to within three to four feet of the ground surface. In the event that these impacts are determined to extend locally to depths greater than five feet, it is proposed that removal excavations would be limited to a depth of five feet bgs. Four issues were evaluated by the Applicant in defining this limitation: worker safety, the potential to encounter groundwater, mitigating risk to burrowing animals, and ensuring that plastic hydrocarbon does not resurface at some later date. The Applicant’s proposal is primarily based on the excavation of surface expressions to a sufficient depth so that the petroleum would not resurface in the future. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-7 Proposed Remediation Areas Source: RAP, AVOCET 2007; MRS 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Applicant’s proposed remediation is designed to ensure that future open space uses of the Project Site do not pose an unacceptable risk to potential ecological receptors, which include birds and burrowing animals. The proposed limit for excavation is below the burrowing depths of most animals that will likely be encountered at the Project Site (DTSC 1996). In some cases, a 0.75-inch gravel layer for the first six inches of backfill would be used to act as a barrier to burrowing animals, if deemed necessary. The Applicant is proposing, based on studies they conducted, that five feet of compacted backfill would prevent resurfacing of the plastic hydrocarbons and that the material is viscous and generally appears to mobilize when exposed to the warming effects of direct sunlight (England Geosystem, Inc. 2001). Soil used for backfill would be compacted to 90 percent of its relative maximum density as determined by American Society for Testing Materials, now ASTM International (ASTM), Method D1557 or as otherwise required for restoration or other uses. Areas that are not excavated as part of the Applicant-proposed remediation would include long-term monitoring and maintenance that would encompass the Project Site. The Applicant proposes that, in the event that plastic hydrocarbons were to resurface, they would be detected by the long-term monitoring program included within the Project Site, and further remedial steps would be taken as part of Project Site maintenance. As proposed by the Applicant, clean materials (those not affected by plastic hydrocarbon) would be segregated during excavation, stockpiled at the Project Site, and re-used as common earth backfill. Common earth may include solid asphaltic hydrocarbon. Materials affected by plastic hydrocarbon would be temporarily stockpiled on-site and then loaded onto trucks, or if site conditions allow, directly-loaded into trucks, and disposed of at an appropriate off-site landfill. 2.3.2.2 Caps Caps are remediation design features that are proposed to serve as covers over affected materials and barriers to separate them from potential human and ecological receptors. They would be constructed from earthen materials, but may also include various geosynthetic materials for additional strength or material separation. Two types of caps are proposed, one to cover contaminated materials in open space areas and another to both cover contaminated materials and to serve as a base within areas proposed for development. The key distinction between the open space and development caps is that the former would include a topsoil layer that would support revegetation. The development caps may be vegetated to minimize erosion, but that would be done directly on the structural fill. In the case of development caps, the revegetation would be of a temporary nature, and it would be maintained in place only long enough to minimize potential soil loss in the interim prior to development. The development caps would be constructed of structural fill with a minimum thickness of four feet. Conversely, the open space caps would be more varied in terms of thickness and composition due to their differing design objectives and individual site constraints. Different cap types are proposed to be used at different locations and are detailed in each one of the corresponding remediation areas. Refer to Figure 2-8 through 2-10 for typical cap design cross- sections. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.3.2.3 Monitoring As noted previously, the consensus among the regulatory agencies was that petroleum in the subsurface is immobile and natural biodegradation prevents migration of dissolved-phase constituents. Consequently, MNA was identified in the FS as the most appropriate approach to addressing impacted groundwater. The principal monitoring activity proposed by the Applicant is MNA. This will be a continuation of the current groundwater sampling and reporting program to verify the stability of the subsurface hydrocarbons and ensure that dissolved-phase constituents are not migrating. The monitoring program currently requires sampling of on-site and off-site wells (see Figure 2-5 for a map of monitoring wells). The Applicant currently samples the monitoring well network on a semi-annual basis, as required by Monitoring and Reporting Program 93-120 (as amended). This monitoring program was required by the RWQCB. Samples are tested for extractable range hydrocarbons, and some samples from well monitoring are also tested for purgeable range hydrocarbons and BTEX. A few samples are analyzed for all three constituent types. Following remediation, the Applicant proposes monitoring including periodic inspections of the caps and excavation areas. This would be done to ensure those remedies continue to function properly. The Applicant proposes that inspections initially occur on a semi-annual basis, just prior to the rainy season, and during or just after the rainy season. Based on inspection results over time, the Applicant will propose adjustments to the inspection procedures and frequencies for the RWQCB’s approval. The Applicant also proposes post-restoration monitoring to ensure that the habitat restoration and replacement efforts are successful. 2.3.2.4 Institutional Controls The Applicant is also proposing a number of institutional controls to be implemented after remediation activities are completed. Those institutional controls would include deed restrictions limiting land use to recreational, commercial and industrial purposes, a soil management plan implemented in the event contaminated soils are disturbed subsequent to development, and prohibition on water wells within affected areas. Specific institutional controls will depend partially on the degree of public access, but are expected to include fencing, signs, awareness programs, and similar active measures to manage the site. Other institutional controls could include deed restrictions and other covenants as needed to manage the Project Site following the completion of the remediation portion of the Project. Long-term monitoring will include periodic inspections and maintenance as needed to ensure that the institutional controls and caps remain effective. Institutional controls are more specifically described for each area to be remediated in Sections 2.3.3.1 through 2.3.3.5 below. 2.3.3 Project Areas Specific Remediation Plans The Project Site is divided into Operable Units (OU’s) and subordinate Areas of Concern AOCs) as shown in Figure 2-7. The OU’s are used in the FS and RAP to organize the site into 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR areas of common physical, chemical, or geographical characteristics. The OU’s are subdivided into AOC’s that address particular environmental issues. This approach facilitates evaluation of remedial technologies and provides a common nomenclature for discussing remedial actions. Based on the different types of contamination at the Project Site (e.g., BTEX in groundwater, arsenic in soil, LNAPL, and Pliable Petroleum Surface Hydrocarbons [PPSH]) and the proposed remediation efforts, five OUs were developed for the Project Site, shown in Figure 2-7. A brief description of each OU and the AOC within each one of the OUs as appropriate is provided in the sections below, accompanied by a discussion of the associated Applicant-proposed remediation (Avocet 2007). Table 2-1 lists the OUs, AOC, and the proposed remedies. Table 2-1 Proposed Remediation by Operable Unit Operable Unit Area of Concern Proposed Remedy 1 – Northwest Operations Area 1 – LNAPL/BTEX-Affected Groundwater Natural Attenuation + IC + LTM 2 – Surface Soils Capping + IC + LTM +Excavation 2 – Reservoirs 5 & 7 NA Capping + IC + LTM 3 – Reservoir 4 NA Capping/Excavation + IC + LTM 4 – Remaining Site-wide Surface and Subsurface Soils 1 – North Marsh Area Excavation + IC + LTM 2 – Reservoir 3 Capping + IC + LTM 3 – PPSH Areas Excavation + IC + LTM 4 - Arsenic Excavation + IC + LTM 5 – Site-Wide Groundwater - Natural Attenuation + IC + LTM Notes: LNAPL = Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid; BTEX = Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene; IC Institutional Controls; LTM = Long-Term Monitoring; PPSH= Pliable Petroleum Surface Hydrocarbons; NA = Not Applicable. Source: AVOCET 2007 2.3.3.1 Operable Unit #1 – Northwest Operations Area OU #1 encompasses approximately 5 acres in the northwest corner of the Project Site designated as service/manufacturing land use (see Figure 2-7). Historically, this area was used to support tank farm and pipeline operations and included equipment and processes not found across the remainder of the Project Site. Consequently, this Northwest Operations Area is affected, by a different set of contaminants than the remainder of the site, namely arsenic in shallow soil and LNAPL with a lighter fraction, including BTEX, in the saturated zone. In addition, a portion of this area of the Project Site is designated in both the City and County General Plans for future commercial development. Although the area zoned for commercial development in either the City or County Development Plan includes all or portions of the northwest corner of the Project Site, including the former aboveground storage tanks secondary containment berms, the area of OU #1 excludes the aboveground storage tank berms due to the identified value of the VPFS habitat that they support. The Northwest Operations Area also lies within the 100-year floodplain. OU #1 includes two AOC: groundwater (AOC #1) and soil (AOC #2). Due to a set of conditions unique to the Northwest Operations Area, the LNAPL in the saturated zone also contains a light fraction (lighter hydrocarbon in the C5-C20 range), including benzene. This light fraction is 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR responsible for the Northwest Operations Area being the only area of the Project Site identified by the RTP where groundwater containing dissolved contaminants (TPH and benzene) at concentrations greater than maximum contaminant levels (or frequently applied action levels) has migrated offsite. The LNAPL impact in the Northwest Operations Area covers an area approximately 600 feet long by 300 feet wide and ranges in depth from four to 28 feet bgs (see Figure 2-6). The light fraction co-occurs with, and is dissolved in, the heavier oil. Light-end hydrocarbons, including BTEX, are hundreds of times more soluble in oil than in water. Therefore, this light fraction would be difficult to remove without also removing the heavier residual oil. In the Northwest Operations Area, groundwater typically occurs at depths ranging from five to 15 feet bgs. AOC #2 includes shallow soil in OU #1, which is affected by arsenic and, to a more limited extent, by TPH and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), and deeper (four to 28 feet bgs) soil affected by the above-described LNAPL. Within OU #1, the arsenic is relatively widespread and limited to shallow (less than two feet) soil, which is consistent with its likely use on the Project Site as an herbicide ingredient. The arsenic was identified as a potential human health risk for both Open Space and Commercial development land uses. The Applicant assumes that the entirety of OU #1 is affected with arsenic, subject to remediation given the available spatial distribution of data. A detailed description of the two AOCs under OU #1 is provided below. Area of Concern #1 – Groundwater The remedial action objectives for OU #1 and AOC #1, established in the FS are intend to prevent human contact with TPH- or benzene-affected groundwater and ensure that groundwater resources down-gradient of existing impacts are not affected. The FS concluded that petroleum constituents are immobile in the environment, migration of dissolved-phase constituents is controlled by natural biodegradation and that MNA with institutional controls will achieve the remedial action objectives. Therefore, the Applicant-proposed remedial method for AOC #1 is MNA with institutional controls and long-term monitoring on-site and off-site. MNA includes regular sampling of the existing groundwater monitoring network on and surrounding AOC #1; chemical analyses on collected samples; and reporting findings to the RWQCB in accordance with an approved monitoring and reporting program. The Applicant is also proposing institutional controls that would include deed restrictions limiting on-site land use to recreational, commercial, or industrial purposes, a soil management plan implemented in the event contaminated soils are disturbed, and prohibition on water wells within affected areas of OU #1 (Northwest Operations Area). Area of Concern #2 – Soil AOC #2 includes shallow soil, which is contaminated with arsenic and, to a more limited extent, by TPH and PAH, and deeper (four to 28 feet bgs) soil affected by LNAP L containing a light fraction. The arsenic is relatively widespread and limited to shallow (less than two feet) soil, which is consistent with its probable former use at the Project Site as an herbicide. The arsenic and PAH have been identified as potential threats to human and ecological receptors (if the area were converted to Open Space). With regard to the deeper soil, the LNAPL was not considered by the Applicant to be a direct-contact risk, but vapor intrusion by the volatile fraction may pose 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR a risk to future on-site commercial workers. Remedial action objectives were primarily focused on preventing human and ecological receptor contact with arsenic, TPH, PAH, and volatile hydrocarbons. Since the area is proposed to be developed, it is not proposed to support suitable ecological habitat. The Applicant-proposed remedy for AOC #2 within OU #1 includes constructing a soil cap, a minimum of four feet in thickness. The cap would provide a barrier between the affected soil and potential receptors and also provide a soil layer of sufficient thickness to facilitate foundation construction and utility installation. A geotextile, placed between the cap and the existing ground surface, is intended by the Applicant to act as an identifying marker to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently excavating into the affected soils. The cap would extend west off the Project Site, approximately 20 feet, and approximately 500 feet north to south. The cap would require long-term monitoring and maintenance. Institutional controls would include deed restrictions limiting land use to commercial and industrial purposes; excavation notification requirements; a soil management plan; groundwater use restrictions in affected areas of OU #1; and a vapor barrier requirement for any new buildings constructed in OU #1, which would protect the building occupants from possible vapors from the underlying hydrocarbons. 2.3.3.2 Operable Unit #2 – Reservoirs 5 and 7 OU #2 includes the former Reservoirs 5 and 7 located in the southwest quadrant of the site (see Figure 2-7). Measured from the outside toe of the reservoir containment berms, the reservoirs cover a total area of 9.8 acres. The reservoirs contain approximately 8.5 acres of wetland, none of which are identified VPFS habitat. Reservoir 5 contains local communities of Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii). Both reservoirs contain ponded water from rising groundwater elevations during the winter. In years of heavy rainfall, it is not unusual for 2 to 3 feet of water to accumulate in the reservoirs. The reinforced concrete bottoms are still present in both of the reservoirs but they are ripped and covered by 1 to 2 feet of tar, non-engineered fill, and construction debris. In both the proposed City and County Development Plans, Reservoirs 5 and 7 are proposed to be designated as Open Space. Reservoirs 5 and 7 are unique because they are the only areas of the Project Site affected by liquid-type hydrocarbon surface expressions, and these are the only surface expressions hydraulically connected to subsurface LNAPL sources. Therefore, removing the shallow hydrocarbon-affected soils would not effectively remediate the sheen that seasonally develops on surface water in the reservoirs. The source of the hydrocarbon sheen is hydrocarbon materials that extend to depths of up to 25 feet below the bottom of the reservoirs. During periods of rain, the water table rises coming in contact with the hydrocarbons and creating the sheen, and pushing hydrocarbon to the surface. Elimination of the sheen would require either removal of the mobile hydrocarbon below ground, making that hydrocarbon immobile, or filling the bottom of the reservoirs to elevations above the seasonal water table highs (RTP 2006). The Applicant-proposed remedy involves capping Reservoirs 5 and 7, institutional controls, and long-term monitoring. Cap construction would involve removing existing, potentially contaminated non-engineered fill down to the existing concrete floor in each reservoir. Gravel 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR would then be placed directly on top of the existing concrete floor in each reservoir 1.5 feet above each reservoir’s historic (1990 to 2005) high water-table elevation. The gravel would be covered with a layer of geotextile and a combination of common earth fill and topsoil to create the finished surface. The cap would be graded to encourage runoff, thereby minimizing water infiltration. A cap cross-section is shown in Figure 2-8. The Applicant is not proposing to replace in OU #2 wetlands that exist in reservoirs but, rather, will mitigate the wetland impacts in other suitable areas of the Project Site by creating additional wetlands. Consequently, it would be necessary to create additional wetlands elsewhere on site. Institutional controls would depend on the level of public access, but are expected to include fencing, signs, awareness programs, and similar active measures to control access to the Project Site. Other institutional controls would include deed restrictions and other covenants as needed to preserve the land as Open Space in perpetuity. Long-term monitoring would include periodic inspections and maintenance as needed to ensure that the institutional controls and cap remain effective. 2.3.3.3 Operable Unit #3 – Reservoir 4 OU #3 includes approximately 30 acres in the eastern part of the Project Site (see Figure 2-7). This area is proposed for future commercial development under both the City and County Development Plans. OU #3 includes Reservoir 4, several surface expressions of hydrocarbon that collectively cover an area of approximately 2.3 acres, the area of the former quarry site, and the area of the former recycling center. The floor of Reservoir 4 is covered with five to six feet of non-engineered, hydrocarbon-affected soil and construction debris. Due to the entrapment hazard posed by the hydrocarbon surface expressions, the ERWG identified these areas, together with some proximal expressions that are not physical hazards, for remediation. OU #3 contains several small areas of wetlands, none of which are VPFS habitat, and at least two special status plants: Congdon’s tarplant and Cambria morning glory (Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis). For OU #3 the Applicant proposes remedial alternatives that would support commercial building foundation loads by removing and replacing the non-engineered, hydrocarbon-affected fill within Reservoir 4, as well as development alternatives that would require minimal structural support, such as a parking lot. Weathered, high-molecular weight TPH-affected soil extends to depths of up to 50 feet below Reservoir 4. The SERRT determined that capping was the preferred remedial alternative for OU 3. The Applicant does not propose remedial measures targeting this material beyond the capping discussed below. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-8 Reservoir 5 and 7 Remediation - Proposed Cap Cross Section Proposed Cap Existing Conditions 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The proposed remediation for OU #3 provides a soil cover over Reservoir 4 that is between 4 and 11 feet thick. The cover would provide a barrier between the affected soil and potential receptors, as well as sufficient structural support for future onsite construction. A geotextile identifying layer, placed between the cap and the existing ground surface, is proposed to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently excavating into the affected soils. See Figure 2-9 for a cross- section of the cap proposed for Reservoir 4. Figure 2-9 Reservoir 4 Remediation - Proposed Cap Cross Section Source: Chevron 2007 Landscaped areas of the cover would be planted with appropriate shallow-rooted vegetation to prevent erosion without penetrating the cover. Development would include the installation of vapor barriers below any future foundations or slabs to protect against potential vapor intrusion. Since residual contamination would remain at depth, the Applicant proposes institutional controls and long-term monitoring that would assess compliance and effectiveness. Institutional controls would include deed restrictions limiting land use to commercial and industrial purposes, a soil management plan implemented in the event contaminated soils are disturbed, maintenance, and monitoring. 2.3.3.4 Operable Unit #4 – Remaining Site-Wide Terrestrial and Wetland Areas OU #4 includes all the remaining terrestrial and wetland areas of the Project Site not considered in the first three OUs. OU #4 covers approximately 270 acres and all but 24 acres is planned as Open Space. Three AOC were defined in OU #4 corresponding to “must-do” areas identified by the SERRT (see Figure 2-7): 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR AOC#1 – the North Marsh; AOC#2 – Reservoir 3, AOC#3 – Other hydrocarbon surface expressions, and;. AOC#4 – Arsenic. Over 57 acres of wetland in Federal, State and County jurisdiction occur in OU #4, including more than 30 acres identified as VPFS habitat. OU #4 also includes substantial coverage by a variety of special status plants. The Risk Management Summary also recommended two areas of surface hydrocarbon expressions surrounding Reservoir 3, which were not identified as ecological risks, for ripping to facilitate re-vegetation. These areas would be ripped to depths of not less than 15 inches. However, ripping will not be conducted in VPFS habitat or other ecologically sensitive areas. A detailed description of the remedies proposed for these AOC is provided below. Area of Concern #1 – North Marsh AOC # 1, the North Marsh, is approximately 11.9 acres of wetlands, identified by the Applicant’s surveys to not contain VPFS habitat, east of the Northwest Operations Area. The wetlands include the most extensive coverage of pliable plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions at the Project Site. When grouped into areas based on proximity, these expressions cover about seven acres. The extent of contamination in the shallow subsurface, however, may be significantly greater. Based on the 1926 topography of the North Marsh, these surface expressions may cover as much as 13 acres. The thickness of the expressions varies, but has been estimated to be two to three feet on average. The Applicant-proposed remedy for this area is to excavate the plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions from the North Marsh, and dispose of the affected material off-site. The area of excavation is estimated between seven and 13 acres, with an average assumed excavation depth of 3.5 feet. Given the areas and thickness, the excavation may generate anywhere from 40,000 to 73,000 cubic yards of material. Any material identified as clean would be stockpiled separately on site and used later as backfill. It is anticipated that the petroleum hydrocarbon-containing soil excavated from the North Marsh area would be disposed of as non-hazardous hydrocarbon-impacted soil (NHIS) at an appropriate landfill. It is proposed by the Applicant that the upper one foot of soil would be replaced with suitable topsoil, consisting either of clean soil from on site or imported to the Project Site from a commercial supplier. Once the excavation and backfill operations are complete, the marsh would be replanted to restore and enhance wetland function. The Applicant is proposing to implement institutional controls that may include fencing, signs, awareness programs, and similar active measures to manage use of the area for wildlife habitat. Other institutional controls proposed by the Applicant would include deed restrictions or other covenants that would maintain the wetlands in perpetuity. Long-term monitoring as proposed by the Applicant would include a monitoring and maintenance program to ensure that those controls remain effective. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Area of Concern #2 – Reservoir 3 AOC #2 includes 8.4 acres within the footprint of former Reservoir 3 in the southern-most area of the Project Site. Much of the ground surface within the former reservoir area is covered by pliable hydrocarbon surface expressions with wildlife entrapment hazard potential. The reservoir is filled with 8 to 11 feet of non-engineered fill, including berm soils, construction debris, and tar. Approximately four acres of precipitation and runoff-supported wetlands hosting VPFS habitat form seasonally along the inside edges of the former reservoir. The Applicant-proposed remediation activities consist of constructing a geo-synthetic and soil cap that would establish a permanent barrier between contaminated soil and potential human and eco-receptors. The cap is proposed to isolate the contamination from the surface and attempt to re-establish wetlands in the same area. As proposed, the cap would be constructed by removing hydrocarbon-impacted soil so that the cap can be installed without significantly changing the existing grades. Approximately 27,000 cubic yards of impacted soil may be removed as part of the cap construction. NHIS would be disposed of at an appropriate landfill. Since the remaining reservoir fill material is non-engineered and has poor bearing capacity, it would be necessary to support the cap with various soil and geo-synthetic materials. A geo- textile would be laid over the exposed work surface and anchored in a trench excavated around the perimeter of the work area. A tri-directional geo-grid anchored in a 1-foot thick gravel layer would distribute loads as evenly as possible and limit settlement to the cap center. A flexible membrane liner, protected above and below by geo-textiles, would create the impermeable barrier. The primary function of the flexible membrane would prevent downward migration of water, which it is anticipated to help support wetland habitat in a manner similar to the current condition. The final component of the cap would be an overlying thickness of common fill and suitable topsoil, which would be contoured to mimic the existing topography and wetland hydrology. See Figure 2-10 for a cross-section of the cap proposed for Reservoir 3. The Applicant estimates these remediation activities would impact as much as 3.9 acres of VPFS habitat. The Applicant-proposed institutional controls would include fencing, signs, awareness programs, and similar active measures to manage use of the area. Other institutional controls would include deed restrictions or other covenants that would maintain the habitat in perpetuity. Long-term monitoring would include periodic inspections and maintenance as needed to ensure that the institutional controls and cap remain effective. Area of Concern #3 – Pliable Surface Expressions of Petroleum AOC #3 includes approximately three acres of hydrocarbon surface expressions in six general areas on the southern portion of the Project Site. One of these areas is within the construction boundary for the Reservoir 2 grading work requested by the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) (See Section 2.3.6, Reconfiguration of Reservoir 2). These surface expressions occur in topographically low areas that accumulated petroleum during the 1926 fire. These expressions are limited in extent by surrounding berms and are 2 to 3 feet thick on average. Because these expressions are in topographically low spots, many occur within wetlands, some of which include VPFS habitat. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-10 Reservoir 3 Remediation - Proposed Cap Cross Section 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The remediation of AOC #3 would consist of excavating the plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions, (approximately 29,000 cubic yards in total), transporting the NHIS off site, and restoring the original grade. The remediation activities are proposed as a method by the Applicant to restore the existing wetland function, create additional wetlands on site as required, establish institutional controls, and provide long-term monitoring. The wetlands affected by the remediation are proposed by the Applicant to be restored. Institutional controls would include fencing, signs, awareness programs, and similar active measures to control access to the Project Site. Other institutional controls would include deed restrictions or other covenants that would protect the wetlands in perpetuity. Long-term monitoring would include periodic inspections to ensure that those controls remain effective. Area of Concern #4 – Arsenic Two areas on the Project Site have elevated levels of arsenic and other metals. The Applicant is proposing to excavate these areas and place the material under the proposed cap for OU #1. Excavations would be limited to a depth of about two feet. A total of approximately 2,700 cubic yards of material would be excavated and placed under the OU #1 cap. The first area is located next to the north side of the Northwest Operations Area. Excavation of this area is anticipated to involve approximately 0.21 acres, including an approximate 0.0048 acre portion where a population of Congdon’s tarplant, a sensitive plant species, has been mapped. There are no wetlands or VPFS habitat in the proposed work area. The second area is located south of Tank Farm Road between Reservoir 2 and the future southeastern development area (Phase 5). Excavation of this area is anticipated to involve approximately 0.81 acres, including an approximate 0.24 acre portion where a population of Congdon’s tarplant has been mapped. It is anticipated that 0.16 acres of federal wetlands, 0.041 acres of state wetlands and two areas with VPFS habitat (FS-77 and FS-82) would be involved in the proposed work area. Prior to the start of work, permits from appropriate agencies will be obtained for the anticipated disturbance to the wetlands and VPFS habitat. After the arsenic is removed, confirmation sampling will be conducted to ensure that the elevated arsenic and other metals have been sufficiently removed. The areas will then be backfilled to blend with surrounding topography. The Site Restoration Plan guidelines will be followed to determine final grading contours and revegetation in these work areas, and as needed to restore the wetlands, VPFS, and Congdon’s tarplant impacted by these activities. 2.3.3.5 Operable Unit #5 – Site-Wide Groundwater OU #5 includes site-wide groundwater, exclusive of the Northwest Operations Area (see Figure 2-7). Groundwater flows toward the southwest at an average rate of about 100 feet per year and primarily within subsurface sandy interbeds in the largely fine-grained valley fill. The major potential source areas for petroleum impacts to water quality in OU #5 are the LNAPL areas underlying the former reservoirs (reservoirs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7). 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR As noted previously, the consensus of the regulatory agencies based on technical studies was that petroleum in the subsurface is immobile and natural biodegradation prevents migration of dissolved-phase constituents. Consequently, MNA was identified in the FS as the most appropriate approach to address impacted groundwater. Groundwater monitoring of OU #5 has been conducted continuously since 1990, both on and off the Project Site, through a network of monitoring wells (see Figure 2-5). For the most part, these samples were tested for TPH and BTEX, although a significant number were also tested for PAH. The Applicant’s proposal for OU #5 would be MNA with additional institutional controls and continued long-term monitoring. MNA includes regularly sampling the existing groundwater monitoring network on and surrounding OU #5, testing those samples for TPH and natural attenuation parameters, and reporting these findings to the RWQCB in accordance with an approved monitoring and reporting program. Institutional controls would include deed restrictions limiting land use to open space and commercial and industrial purposes and groundwater use restrictions in and adjacent to petroleum-impacted areas. Land use restrictions could also be required by the RWQCB on the adjacent Betita Property (see Figure 2-6), south of the Project Site, due to the localized presence of petroleum in the subsurface. 2.3.4 Building and Structure Demolition Four buildings located in the Northwest Operations Area are proposed to be demolished during remediation. Three of these buildings were constructed to support former operations at the Project Site, but now exist as office space. The fourth, a modular building adjacent to the northernmost original building, was constructed within the last eight years to provide additional office space. Given the age of the three older buildings, the Applicant surveyed these buildings for lead- containing and asbestos-containing materials and found that they are present. Therefore, abatement would precede physical demolition of the buildings. Prior to abatement, a National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) demolition notification form, asbestos survey report, and an asbestos abatement work plan would be submitted to the SLOAPCD. Asbestos-containing materials would be abated in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Any suspect material found during abatement and not previously identified would be presumed asbestos-containing materials unless contradicted by specific laboratory data. Asbestos-containing materials would be properly wrapped, placed in covered roll-off bins, and disposed of at a licensed disposal facility (e.g., Kettleman Hills). Once abatement activities are completed, recyclable or potentially re-usable materials would be removed. The building structure would be demolished using excavators. Some of the buildings have metal structural elements or siding, which would be segregated for recycling, if economical. Other materials would be loaded into haul trucks for disposal. Concrete foundations would be 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR broken apart using a hydraulic hammer. It is possible that concrete would be crushed and used as gravel elsewhere on the Project Site or hauled off site for recycling or disposal. Utility lines would be disconnected and abandoned. Where lines are aboveground, they would be removed. Where utility service is brought to a building underground, the line is proposed to be cut at a point at least two feet below grade and capped. Service lines that use pipes or conduits greater than four inches in diameter (e.g., water, septic) would be filled with cement grout. Voids created in the existing grade by demolition would be backfilled with structural fill or gravel. Demolition activities would also occur in other locations throughout the Project Site. These include the removal of existing infrastructure, such as concrete walls, barb-wire fencing, and concrete foundations. Demolition activities would occur at the following locations: Reservoirs 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 (fencing, concrete foundations, concrete walls, etc.); The Flower Mound (fencing, concrete debris, etc.); The North Marsh (i.e., protective fencing and netting); and Other Areas (e.g., debris piles, concrete vault). 2.3.5 Pipeline Decommissioning Historical operations at the Project Site were served by approximately 25,000 feet of crude oil pipeline, about 47,000 feet of water supply line, and about 1,200 feet of other pipeline. Figure 2- 3 shows the approximate locations of these lines. When operational, the Project Site required numerous pipelines to move oil between the pump house, boilers, tanks, and reservoirs. Water, natural gas, and septic lines also served the Project Site. Figure 2-3 shows pipeline locations based on historical facility drawings. The Applicant estimates that of the approximately 25,000 feet of oil pipeline installed onsite about 4,500 feet are found in the Northwest Operations Area. The Applicant has prepared a pipeline abandonment strategy for either the removal or in-place decommissioning of pipelines at the Project Site. Portions of lines that are within work areas and any pipelines located above ground would be removed for disposal. Subsurface pipelines outside the work areas may be closed in place by the most appropriate method, such as pressure-grouting or drained and filled with another suitable material such as light-weight concrete or sand slurry, including those crossing an environmentally sensitive area (e.g., wetland). All pipelines would be flushed and, may be pigged to remove residual hydrocarbon and vapors prior to abandonment. Pigging in pipeline maintenance refers to the practice of using pipeline inspection gauges or 'pigs' to perform various operations on a pipeline, including the use of devices to remove solid or semi-solid deposits or debris from the pipeline. The devices are inserted into the pipeline and pushed through and received at the other end where the debris collected from the pipeline would accumulate. If a section of pipeline is in such poor condition that it cannot be adequately cleaned, it would be excavated and removed in its entirety. These procedures of pipeline draining and decommissioning could be modified based upon field conditions or improved methods. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Pipeline Inventory The locations of the pipelines shown in Figure 2-3 have not been field-verified. While these figures are reasonable approximations of their locations, final remediation would require more accurate information. Prior to abandonment, the Applicant would conduct a detailed field survey to locate the lines and characterize their contents. Potholes would be dug at key locations (e.g., ends, transitions, junctions, and valves) to expose the pipe and determine its diameter and materials of construction. Line tracing may be performed using an appropriate geophysical instrument operated by a trained technician. The alignment of the pipeline would be flagged. Pothole and flag locations would be recorded using a high-precision Global Positioning System GPS). A detailed pipeline inventory, noting information such as location, depth, size, materials of construction, and condition, would be created to guide abandonment activities. Given the interconnected, and possibly deteriorated, web of pipelines within the Northwest Area, the Applicant may elect to cut the lines at the operable unit boundary and completely remove them from its interior. In this case, the lines would be removed in accordance with the procedures presented below after their locations have been confirmed. Pipeline Cleaning Water trucks attached to portable pumps would be connected via hose to each petroleum pipeline segment within the facility. Additionally, several portable storage tanks or vacuum trucks would be stationed and attached to the pipelines to receive and collect the flush water. Each pipeline segment would be flushed with an adequate volume of water to remove residual oil from the pipelines. Pipeline flushing operations would continue until flush water containing total petroleum hydrocarbons of less than 100 parts per million is achieved. The pipeline segments where pigging may be done would be identified by the Applicant during the initial potholing activities or other field activities. The pigging operations would be basically the same for each pigging run segment. The maintenance tool or pipeline pig is introduced into the line via a pig trap, which includes a launcher and receiver. Without interrupting flow, the pig is then forced through it by fluid flow, or it can be towed by another device or cable. Usually cylindrical or spherical, pigs sweep the line by scraping the sides of the pipeline and pushing debris ahead. Each segment would have a beginning location where the pig is “launched” and an end section where the pig is “received.” First, the launching and receiving locations would be prepared for the procedure. Buried ends of the pipeline would be excavated. The excavations would vary depending on the depth of the pipe, but would not typically exceed an area larger than 7 feet wide by 12 feet long (84 square feet) and no more than five feet deep. A trench box could be used to minimize the area affected by the excavation. The pipeline fluids would be drained from the pipe and the pipe would then be cold-cut to gain access to the pipe. The pig launcher and receiver would then be attached to the exposed pipe ends. Once the pig launcher and receiver are attached to the pipeline, the subject pipe segment would be pigged. The pigging operation would involve the use of scraper-type or foam pigs. The scraper pig is constructed to help remove any remaining hydrocarbons from the inside walls of 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR the pipeline as it moves down the pipe. Liquefied nitrogen gas or compressed air would push the pigs through the piping segment. At the receiving end, vacuum trucks would remove any liquids from the pipe as the liquids are pushed ahead of the pigs. Carbon filtration canisters would treat any vapor emissions generated during pipeline purging operations, in accordance with SLOAPCD requirements. The Applicant would obtain approval from SLOAPCD for the proposed activities. Recovered hydrocarbons and water from the pigging operation would be properly disposed of or recycled. There is the possibility that a pig may become lodged in the pipe by an obstruction. If the pig becomes obstructed along a pipe segment, the field crews would identify these locations. Excavation activities may be required to remove the pig and the damaged or obstructed section of pipe. Pipeline Grouting Pipelines that are scheduled for abandonment in place with diameters greater than four inches would be grouted with a cement-slurry to prevent any future ground subsidence from pipe wall collapse. A portable grout pump would pump grout into the pipeline segments. Following grouting, the pipeline segment ends would be backfilled with soil and the soil compacted. Pipeline Segment Removal The Applicant proposes to remove piping within the Project Site that is located within remediation work areas or is determined to be in poor condition. If practical, the pipeline segments would be flushed or pigged prior to removal. The pipeline segment endpoints would be isolated and cut. The pipeline segment would then be uncovered by excavating a trench to the existing pipeline depth. As the pipeline is removed from the trench, a spill containment device would be placed under the pipeline end to catch any residual fluids in the containment. All liquids drained from the piping into the containment device would be removed using a vacuum truck and hauled to an approved facility for disposal or recycling. The pipe segments would then be cut into manageable pieces, the pipe ends wrapped in plastic to prevent spillage, the segments removed from the trench, and the trench backfilled. Scrap pipe would be temporarily stored in bins and transported off site for recycling. It is estimated that approximately 1,700 linear feet of pipeline will be removed and transported to a recycling facility. 2.3.6 Reconfiguration of Reservoir 2 The Applicant proposes to make a number of modifications to Reservoir 2 to improve airport safety by addressing concerns raised by the ALUC. The location of Reservoir 2 is shown in Figure 2-2. Detailed drawing of the proposed modifications to Reservoir 2 are provide in Appendix A.3, pages A.3-14 though A.3-17. Reservoir 2 was a 600-foot diameter crude oil storage reservoir constructed by Union Oil of California in 1910. The reservoir had concrete walls and a wooden roof and was surrounded by a roughly trapezoidal berm approximately 15 feet high and 150 feet wide at its base for secondary 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR containment. The 1926 fire damaged the reservoir and left an asphalt layer over the berm slopes and concrete floor. The reservoir was never rebuilt. In later decades the SLOCRA was constructed to the southeast of the Project Site. The main runway alignment intersects the reservoir, which is now a significant feature within the RPZ. The ALUC identified this feature as a safety concern if an aircraft had to make an emergency landing within the RPZ. As part of site work activities, the Applicant is proposing to cut the wall and grade the berm to a more gentle topography. The standing portions of wall, approximately 12 feet high, would be cut approximately two feet above the ground and laid flat on the adjacent concrete floor. The asphaltic material, which may impede plant growth if left on the surface, would be scraped from the berm surface and placed against the outer side of the wall. The berm material would be graded to flatten the slopes while providing at least two feet of soil cover above the concrete wall. Figure 2 in Appendix A.3 provides detailed drawings of the proposed modifications to Reservoir 2. The limit of grading would be 11.9 acres. The net disturbance would be 10.9 acres, since the proposed grading overlaps approximately one acre of other remediation related disturbances. A setback as determine in consultation with USFWS would be established within the reservoir around the VPFS habitat. Outside the reservoir, a setback from adjacent VPFS habitat would be maintained. Grading would include approximately 38,000 cubic yards of berm material, with the anticipation that no or minimal materials would be imported or exported relative to this activity. Compaction would meet the requirements in the grading permit from the County. The finished surface would be scarified, except at the access roads, to promote re-vegetation and would be restored as part of the restoration program. The berm height would be lowered between four and eight feet, depending upon the surrounding topography. This would reduce slope grades from approximately 50 percent to between 5 and 12 percent. The direction of slope and slope breaks would be positioned to ensure that the interior wetlands capture at least the same amount of rainwater as the existing condition. The broad flat slope created on the west side of the reservoir would facilitate access by large emergency vehicles. In addition, compacted gravel all-weather roads designed per applicable CALFIRE requirements would provide permanent access to the interior of the former reservoir and to existing trails serving the runway light system. The existing paved pad would be retained for future use as an emergency staging area. Any gates to this area would be set back from Tank Farm Road to allow emergency vehicles to pull off of the road while gaining access to the site. Appendix A.3 provides detailed drawings on the proposed modifications to Reservoir 2. 2.3.7 Miscellaneous Clean-up Four locations on site have been designated by the Applicant as requiring clean-up or demolition, not parts of an OU or an AOC. They are not generally “contaminated” or affected areas, although they could have some affected soil associated with them. These areas are comprised of debris or abandoned structures that are unattractive or possible physical hazards (see Figure 2-11). 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-11 Miscellaneous Clean-up Areas Source: RAP AVOCET 2007; MRS 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-37 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Three of the locations are in the area north of Tank Farm Road. There are two debris piles along the north property line. They appear to contain mostly concrete debris. As with other concrete debris, the contractor would crush this material and reuse it for gravel elsewhere on the Project Site. Otherwise, the concrete would be hauled off-site for recycling or disposal. The third area identified on the parcel north of Tank Farm Road is the historical debris disposal area adjacent to the North Marsh (see Figure 2-11). The material in this area would be excavated and removed for disposal or recycling as appropriate. The limits and characteristics of the waste would be defined prior to excavation and disposal. It is assumed that the debris extends to a depth of five feet and that the excavation volume is 18,000 cubic yards. Material removed from the excavation would be segregated on the basis of how it would be managed. Concrete would be recycled, as described previously. Other construction debris would be sent to a solid waste landfill for disposal. Affected soils would either be sent to the proposed stockpile area for later disposal or directly to the landfill designated for disposal. The excavation adjacent to the North Marsh would not be backfilled in order to accommodate habitat mitigation later in the Project. The fourth miscellaneous clean-up location is south of Tank Farm Road, adjacent to Reservoir 6 see Figure 2-11). It is a concrete vault of uncertain purpose, approximately five feet wide, 12 feet long, and eight feet deep. The crude oil supply line serving Reservoirs 6 and 7 is connected to it, but it is not known if it was a separator, a valve box, or served some other purpose. The vault is open and presents a physical hazard to people and animals, and is a possible wildlife entrapment hazard. The steel hand rail would be removed and the upper three feet of the concrete wall would be broken and used to fill the bottom of the vault. A sand-cement slurry would fill the void spaces. The remaining depth of the vault would be backfilled with common fill until the original grade is re-established. Figure 2-11 also shows the location of three historical water wells. Applicant inspection of these areas has not revealed any surface features associated with the wells. It is likely that the wells were abandoned many years ago and any other record of them has long since been lost. The Applicant is proposing to conduct a field investigation to verify the location and condition of the wells. It is probable that the wells were constructed with steel casings, and if they are still present, they should be detected by a magnetometer. A backhoe will be used to expose the areas identified by the detections and identify them. If the wells are located, it will be ascertained if they were properly abandoned, and if the method of abandonment does not meet modern standards, the wells will be abandoned according to the requirements of California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 74-81. 2.3.8 Construction Methods Construction methods address issues such as mobilization, staging areas, site access, transport of contaminated material, utilities, borrow areas, site grading, and chemical usage. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.3.8.1 Mobilization, Staging Areas, Truck Transport and Access Mobilization Mobilization activities include moving equipment and construction support facilities/trailers onsite, improving site access, installing storm water and dust control best management practices, and creating habitat protection measures. Figure 2-12 shows the anticipated work areas and the proposed staging areas and access routes. The work areas are the limits within which remediation activities would be conducted for a given OU or AOC. The work area limit would be generally defined by the extent to which a particular site must be cleared and grubbed to properly perform the work needed, and provide the contractor with sufficient room to move equipment and materials. Staging Areas The Applicant has identified three main and four auxiliary staging areas at the Project Site (see Figure 2-12). The main staging areas would be at the former recycling area (primary staging area), the Northwest Operations Area, and the Southern Staging Area. Major maintenance (e.g., engine repair, fluid changes) would only be performed at the primary staging areas in specially prepared areas with proper spill control measures in place. Four auxiliary staging areas identified for use during remediation activities are at the four OU areas. The auxiliary staging areas would be directly adjacent to the work areas and would be used to stage materials, park equipment, nursery area, and other support activities. Vehicles and equipment would be fueled and undergo minor maintenance (e.g., changing tires) at the staging areas. The staging areas could also be used as stockpile areas for clean and impacted soils removed as part of the excavation process. Stockpiled impacted soil would be placed on plastic liners or other impervious surface and would be covered with a SLOAPCD-approved vapor emissions control method when not active for more than 24 hours. Storm water control best management practices (BMPs) would be installed around all soil stockpiles. Internal access routes have been chosen to use existing roads where feasible and thereby avoid sensitive habitat. These routes may require widening and drainage improvement (see Figure 2- 12). A flagman or other means of traffic control would be provided, as necessary, at the proposed Tank Farm Road crossing. The Applicant would provide a temporary signalized intersection at the main access point to the site to provide safe ingress and egress for project-related traffic. Construction Water Supply Water of suitable quality is available on site for construction purposes. Existing water wells are located near the Northwest Area, at the southwest corner of the Project Site, at the southernmost tip of the Project Site, and on the eastern edge of the Project Site south of Tank Farm Road. As necessary, the contractor would supply pumps, storage tanks, and stands to fill water trucks for dust control and other construction activities. One storage tank and fill stand would be located next to the existing water well at the Northwest Area, and another would be located south of Tank Farm Road, adjacent to the entrance. The contractor would also supply sanitary facilities at needed locations. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-39 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-12 Proposed Work Areas, Staging Areas, and Site Access Source: RAP AVOCET 2007; MRS 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Off-site Hauling of Material It is anticipated that most hydrocarbon-affected soils would be disposed of at the NHIS facility at the City of Santa Maria Landfill. Use of NHIS by the Santa Maria Landfill as cover material is consistent with the requirements included in Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations and has been approved by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and the RWQCB. NHIS material includes, but is not limited to, soils from oil field sumps, tank farms, pipeline leaks, or petroleum product spills. The Santa Maria Landfill has an NHIS program addressing the types and monitoring of the NHIS received at the landfill that the Project would comply with. The proposed truck route for transporting petroleum-containing soil and demolition debris from the Project Site is as follows: Westbound on Tank Farm Road; Southbound on South Higuera Street; Either westbound on Los Osos Valley Road to the U.S. Highway 101 on-ramps or continue south to the South Higuera U.S. Highway 101 on-ramps; and Southbound U.S. Highway 101, trucks would exit at Betteravia Road in Santa Maria, travel east on Betteravia Road to Philbric Road, then north on Philbric Road to the City of Santa Maria Landfill entrance. An alternate route would be the following: East on Tank Farm Road; Southbound on Highway 227; Westbound on Price Canyon Road; and South on Price Street to the southbound U.S. Highway 101 on-ramp. The route from U.S. Highway 101 to the City of Santa Maria Landfill would be same. The route would be the same in reverse for inbound trucks. The Applicant estimates that 10,500 truck trips (round trips) would be necessary to transport the NHIS to the Santa Maria Landfill. Given the uncertainty with estimating the amount of affected soil from remediation project, the Applicant has requested that the EIR include a 25 percent contingency. This contingency would increase the total exported affected material to 196,250 cubic yards, or approximately 13,125 truck trips (round trips), see Table 2-3. Hours of work are planned to occur, as feasible, pre-dawn and during daylight hours, Monday through Friday, all year round. Standard construction work hours will be Monday through Friday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. However, intermittent truck loading and hauling operations may start at 6:00 a.m. if needed to avoid morning commuter traffic. Figure 2-13 shows the truck routes between the Project Site and U.S. Highway 101. The material that would be transported to the Santa Maria Landfill would be used as cover for closing landfill cells. The material would be tested to ensure it meets the Santa Maria Landfill’s specifications for NHIS. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-41 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-13 Proposed Truck Routes Source: RAP AVOCET 2007 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-42 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Soil that does not meet the Santa Maria Landfill’s NHIS criteria would be sent to another licensed facility able to accept hydrocarbon-affected soil, either Clean Harbor’s Class I disposal facility in Buttonwillow, California or the Chemical Waste Management Class I disposal facility in Kettleman Hills, California. The truck route to the Buttonwillow facility would be the following: Access Northbound U.S. Highway 101 either via Los Osos Valley Road as described above or via the Prado Road on-ramp; U.S. Highway 101 northbound; East on Highway 46; South on Highway 33; and, East on Lokern Road to the landfill entrance. The designated highway route to CWM Kettleman Hills Landfill would be the following: U.S. Highway 101 northbound; East on Highway 46; and, Northeast on Highway 41 to the landfill entrance. The Applicant requested that the EIR evaluate a contingency for disposal of up to one-third of the affected soil to be excavated, or 50,000 cubic yards entailing approximately 3,500 round trips, of the soil at either of these two Class I disposal locations. Site Access The principal entrance to the Project Site would be relocated to the primary staging area near the former recycling area. The Applicant is proposing that the entrance gate be moved back 60 to 100 feet from Tank Farm Road and that adequate turn lanes be provided into the Project Site. The greater distance the entrance gate is from the road would allow trucks to park at the gate without blocking traffic along Tank Farm Road. The Applicant would provide a temporary signalized intersection at the main access point to the Project Site to provide safe ingress and egress for Project-related traffic. Other access points would be provided as needed but controlled by the contractor. At a minimum, it would be necessary for the contractor to move vehicles, personnel, equipment, and materials between the north and south portions of the Project Site across Tank Farm Road. This would occur at the location shown in Figure 2-12, approximately 750 feet west of the primary staging area. The existing gate to the south portion of the Project Site is the current access point and would be maintained for use during remediation. A new, appropriately sized gate would be installed to provide access to the north portion of the Project Site directly across from the south gate so that traffic crosses Tank Farm Road in the minimum distance and time. The existing gate at the Northwest Area would be used as an exit location for right-turning trucks leaving the site. The internal routes shown in Figure 2-12 are intended to provide the contractor with access to all potential work and borrow areas across the Project Site with as little impact to sensitive habitat as possible. The access routes utilize existing dirt tracks. Those shown as solid lines in Figure 2- 12 would be required, while those shown as dashed lines would only be used if the borrow sources shown at the end of those routes are developed. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-43 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR It is anticipated that most routes must be able to accommodate two-way traffic. Existing dirt tracks would be widened, as necessary, to at least 24 feet in the direction that is least likely to affect adjoining sensitive habitat. Management procedures would be used to minimize impacts from dust and erosion. Where necessary, the contractor would improve the roadway by grooming the sub-grade to provide a reasonably smooth surface. A geo-textile placed over the sub-grade would provide separation between the sub-grade and a minimum 6-inch thick course of compacted crushed miscellaneous base or gravel. 2.3.8.2 Borrow-Area Excavations Based on initial estimates, the Applicant proposes to use a majority of the soil materials needed for remediation from on-site sources. The following sections discuss the various proposed borrow sources, the types of materials available in each, and the estimated quantity of potential borrow material. Figure 2-14 shows the location of each of the borrow sources, and Table 2-2 summarizes the estimated material quantities available from each location. Table 2-2 Borrow Site Quantities Area Gross Area acres) Topsoil cubic yards) Common Earth cubic yards) Gravel cubic yards) Off-Site Cut cubic yards) Borrow # 1 8.6 9,000 27,200 0 0 Borrow # 2 8.5 20,700 0 0 0 Borrow # 3 17 19,700 59,250 0 0 Flower Mound 55 0 268,000 82,000 Off-Site Area 4.1 73,700a Reservoir 5 & 7 Berms - 0 71,600 0 0 Total - 49,400 420,900 82,000 73,700 a. While off-site material must be removed, it may not be available for use by the Applicant and is therefore not counted in the borrow quantities. Source: AVOCET 2007 It is important to note, however, that some borrow materials, especially the tank berms, would contain asphaltic materials that are inseparably embedded into the soil matrix. Only the plastic hydrocarbon has been identified by the Applicant as posing a potential hazard or risk, and where plastic hydrocarbons are expressed at the surface or exposed during other excavations they would be removed. Conversely, the asphaltic materials are not proposed for removal and, consistent with the findings and recommendations of the FS, this material may be incorporated into the common or structural fills. There is a possibility that the material at the former quarry site will not meet the RAP’s gravel specification for backfill. In addition, any topsoil deficit would need to be closed by manufacturing topsoil from other borrow materials or importing topsoil from off-site sources. The total volume of import would be limited to the amount of gravel required for remediation. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-44 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-14 Proposed Borrow Sites Source: RAP AVOCET 2007 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-45 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR In the case of having to use off-site material, this material would have to come from a commercially available gravel source in San Luis Obispo County or Santa Barbara County. Possible gravel sources include the Rocky Canyon Quarry in Atascadero, Kaiser Quarry in Santa Margarita, or the Hanson sand and gravel quarry in Sisquoc, near Santa Maria. Flower Mound The Flower Mound is a disturbed rock outcrop (i.e., former quarry site) that exists in the northeastern corner of the Project Site and extends off-site to the north and east (see Figure 2-2). It is an outcrop of the basement bedrock complex known as the Franciscan Formation. This area is proposed by the Applicant to be used as a borrow site due to its available rock material for backfill of excavation areas. The Applicant anticipates that the Flower Mound material would be readily suitable for use as common or structural fill. The elevation of the Flower Mound would be lowered to allow for the Santa Fe Road extension to go through the area. Approximately 4.1 acres of the Flower Mound that extends beyond the Project Site boundary to the north and east and would also be removed as part of the Project. The portion of the Flower Mound area that is located on the Project Site is approximately 55 acres. The Applicant is proposing to excavate 350,000 cubic yards of material from this location. Due to the composition of the rock, the Applicant is proposing to do so by blasting with directed explosive charges. It is uncertain how much of the Flower Mound excavation will require blasting. Processing the excavated material would include crushing with a rock crushing machine, and may include sorting with loaders, stationary static sorting screens, and possibly washing, depending upon what materials are required by the Project. Berms Numerous berms were erected around the Project Site during its operational life. These were principally constructed to contain oil spills and to isolate the reservoirs in the event of fire. The Applicant proposes to use the berms adjacent to Reservoirs 5 and 7 as the common fill required for cap construction. This material may contain plastic hydrocarbons and, therefore, be unsuitable for structural fill. Borrow activities would be monitored and the materials segregated, as necessary, for various uses and to ensure that contaminated material is not used for fill. Borrow #1 Borrow #1 is an approximately 8.6-acre site located adjacent to the North Marsh. It includes areas that may have been used as a disposal area for demolition debris from the 1926 fire. The Applicant reports that the disposed materials consist mostly of construction debris, such as concrete and wood. This material would be characterized, removed, and disposed of at an appropriately permitted facility. The Applicant estimates that the disposal area contains a total of approximately 10,325 cubic yards, including debris, assuming an average depth of approximately four feet. Soil suitable for use as common and structural fill, and possibly as topsoil, would be removed from the borrow area after removal of the debris. The grading contours for this area would begin at the existing floor of the wetland area and slope back to the east at approximately 0.5 percent. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-46 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Side slopes would be no greater than 4:1 (horizontal:vertical). This grading approach would generate approximately 36,200 cubic yards of common or structural fill. This borrow source would be used on an as-needed basis and the remaining depression is proposed to be used to create additional wetlands. The Applicant estimates that approximately 7.48 acres of habitat could be generated in this area. Borrow #2 Borrow #2 is located on the east portion of the Project Site, south of Tank Farm Road. It covers approximately 8.54 acres but does not include any pre-existing wetlands. This borrow site would generate topsoil suitable for use in revegetating the caps. It is estimated that approximately 20,700 cubic yards of topsoil would be excavated from this location. A portion of the topsoil horizon would be removed for use in remediation. After borrow operations are completed, the borrow site would be re-graded to support future development. Borrow #3 Borrow #3 is located west of Reservoirs 5 and 6 and would function similarly to Borrow #1. It provides a useful source for common fill and structural fill, and possibly topsoil. It also provides a location that, if utilized, potentially creates additional wetland habitat that can mitigate the habitat that is affected during remediation. The proposed area is approximately 17.5 acres in area, including approximately 6.59 acres of existing wetland. It is assumed that material would be borrowed from this source starting at the wetland along the south boundary. The existing grade would be lowered to the elevation in the southwest corner and then allowed to slope up at approximately 0.5 percent to the north. This approach would yield approximately 78,950 cubic yards of borrow material. Gravel Source Contingency The Applicant has requested that the potential use of commercially available gravel for construction of the proposed reservoir caps instead of on-site gravel sources be analyzed as part of this Project as an alternative gravel source. Up to 82,000 cubic yards of gravel would be required during the construction. There is a possibility that the material at the former quarry site will not meet the RAP’s gravel specification. If needed, the Applicant would import this material from a commercially available gravel source in San Luis Obispo County or Santa Barbara County. Possible gravel sources include the Rocky Canyon Quarry in Atascadero, Kaiser Quarry in Santa Margarita, or the Hanson Sand and Gravel Quarry in Sisquoc near Santa Maria. 2.3.8.3 Remediation Excavation Procedures and Quantities As described above, some affected near-surface soils, mostly those affected by petroleum with wildlife entrapment potential, are proposed to be excavated. Where performed in conjunction with construction of a cap, the excavation would remove a limited amount of material defined by an excavation depth (e.g., two feet) or by exposure of some existing feature (e.g., a former reservoir bottom). 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-47 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Remedial excavation areas include the North Marsh and other hydrocarbon (liquid and pliable areas, see Figure 2-7) AOCs. The remedial excavation approach would be limited to pliable hydrocarbon material. There may be field determinations as to the need for removal of some hydrocarbon materials, depending on the level of contamination, and these determinations would be made with the concurrence of a regulatory agency representative. The Applicant is proposing to use the material for fill, topsoil, or reuse on site based on the physical characteristics of the soil as encountered during excavation and depending on the final grading for the area in question. Field investigations have shown that the isolated pockets of plastic hydrocarbon identified for removal are the byproducts of the fire or operational spills and appear to be localized to within three to four feet of the ground surface. In the event that these impacts are determined to extend locally to depths greater than five feet, it is proposed that removal excavations would be limited to a depth of five feet bgs. One objective of the remedial design is to ensure that future open space uses of the Project Site do not pose an unacceptable risk to potential ecological receptors, which include burrowing animals. The Applicant proposed limit for excavation is below the burrowing depths of most animals that are likely to be encountered at the Project Site (DTSC 1996). Further protection being proposed by the Applicant is to use a 0.75-inch gravel for the first six inches of backfill to act as a barrier to burrowing animals. Soil used for structural backfill in development areas would be compacted to 90 percent of its relative maximum density as determined by ASTM Method D1557. Clean material from the excavations would be segregated during excavation, stockpiled at the Project Site and re-used as common earth backfill. Affected soils would be temporarily stockpiled at the Northwest Operations Area and then loaded onto trucks. It is possible that if conditions allow trucks could be directly loaded at the excavation sites. Any material trucked offsite would be disposed of at an appropriate off-site landfill. It is estimated that remedial actions could generate up to 157,000 cubic yards of affected soil. A secondary stockpile area has been identified on the south side of the Project Site as part of a staging area, adjacent to the gate on the existing paved area (see Figure 2-12). It is likely that this area would also be used to store equipment or materials. The paved area is slightly greater than one acre, and the stockpile would be limited in capacity to approximately 15,000 cubic yards. In operating a stockpile for affected soil, the Applicant would cover the stockpile or utilize other means to keep fugitive air emissions within regulatory limits. 2.3.9 Site Grading for Remediation and Pad Development Table 2-3 shows the grading, cut, and fill from each area that would be part of the remediation and pad development for the Project. Appendix A.1 (Remedial Action Plan, Appendix C) provides the grading plans for the following areas: 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-48 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-3 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities Grading Area acres) Work Area acres) Estimated Affected Soil cubic yards) Common Fill cubic yards) Structural Fill cubic yards ) Gravel cubic yards)c Topsoil cubic yards) Geotextile 12oz./ Geomembrane/ Geogrid acres) OU #1- Northwest Area 6.4 6.4 - - 53,400 - - 6.4/0/0 OU #2 -Reservoir 5 7.8 10.4 15,300 12,500 - 20,100 12,600 7.8/0/0 OU #2 -Reservoir 7 6.8 8.0 11,000 24,500 - 39,000 11,000 3.7/0/0 OU #3- Reservoir #4 52.6 52.6 - - 262,800 - - 7.9/0/0 OU #4- North Marsh Area 13.3 15.6 75,300 53,800 - - 21,500 - OU #4- Reservoir 3 6.9 13.3 26,700 5,100 - 10,500 11,100 20.0/6.7/6.7 OU #4 -Remaining Petroleum Expressions 5.9 3.6 28,700 19,200 - - 9,500 - OU #4 - Arsenic 1.0 1.3 2,675 3,300 - 1,650 - Reservoir 2 a 11.9 11.9 - - - - - - Phase 5 Development Area 12.1 12.1 - - 57,900 - - - Access Roads 4.7 4.7 - - - 3,800 - - Nursery 2.3 2.3 - - - 4,300 - - Contactor Staging Area 4.0 4.0 - - - 4,300 - - Total 135.7 146.2 159,675b 118,400 374,100 82,000 67,350 45.8/6.7/6.7 Offsite Hauling With 25 percent contingency 196,250 a. Grading will involve approximately 38,000 cubic yards of berm material, with the anticipation that no or minimal materials will be imported or exported relative to this activity. Some small areas of petroleum expressions within the grading boundaries will be excavated; volume is included in OU#4. b. The 2,675 cubic yards from OU #4, Arsenic will be placed under caps onsite, leaving 157,000cubic yards of NHIS to be hauled offsite. The Applicant has requested a 25% contingency be added to this offsite hauling number to account for the uncertainties associated with estimating impacted soil volumes for remediation projects. This would increase the number to 196,250 cubic yards. c. If needed, gravel would be imported from a commercially available gravel source in San Luis Obispo County or Santa Barbara County. Possible gravel sources include the Rocky Canyon Quarry in Atascadero, Kaiser Quarry in Santa Margarita, or the Hanson Sand and Gravel Quarry in Sisquoc near Santa Maria Note: Borrow Site grading and earthwork quantities are provided in Table 2-2. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-49 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Northwest Area Cap Grading Plan (OU #1); Reservoir 3 Grading Plan (OU #4); Reservoir 4 Cap and Flower Mound Grading Plan (OU #3); Reservoir 5 Cap Grading Plan (OU #2); Reservoir 7 Cap Grading Plan (OU #2); and Borrow Area #3. As described in Section 2.3.8, Remediation Schedule and Section 2.5.1.2, City Development Plan Construction Phase of the Project Description, the Applicant’s grading proposal is designed to encompass remediation and pre-development grading. 2.3.10 Remediation Schedule, Employee, and Traffic Details This section estimates manpower and equipment requirements to complete the remediation activities at the Project Site. Table 2-4 shows the anticipated employees needed to complete the remediation activities. Table 2-5 shows the anticipated equipment requirements for the remediation component of the Project. Table 2-4 Employee Requirements for Remediation Number Job Category 1 Project Manager 1 Construction Manager 1 Foreman 1-2 Safety Officers 6-10 Equipment Operators 10-14 Truck Drivers 4-6 Surveyors/Soils Technicians/Environmental Monitors 5-10 Laborers 29-45 Total (plus extra truck drivers as needed) Table 2-5 Equipment Requirements for Remediation Number Equipment Type 2-3 Bulldozers 2-4 Excavators 2-4 Rubber-tired front end loaders 4-6 10-wheeled dump trucks 1-2 Vacuum truck 1 Universal processor 2-4 Sheep’s foot Compactors (self-propelled) 2 Motor graders 2-4 Flatbed utility truck 1 Trucking services (as necessary) 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-50 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR These tables are based on working one 10-hour shift per day, Monday through Friday. Typically, construction work will be conducted Monday through Friday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Work may occasionally be conducted on Saturdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. if needed to achieve the remediation schedule. Also, intermittent truck loading and hauling operations may start at 6:00 a.m. if necessary to avoid morning commuter traffic. It is anticipated that maintenance or other light duty work may be conducted outside of normal construction work hours. This work may include construction equipment maintenance, repair and transport to and from the mechanic’s work area, the construction staging area or other designated work area as well as the delivery or removal of construction equipment to and from the project site. Other activities conducted outside of normal construction work hours may include personnel working in the office, botanical management at the growing facility, restoration planting, maintenance of biological protection netting and fencing or erosion control devices, etc. These activities would take place in various areas of the Project Site, and would involve personnel in passenger or all-terrain vehicles and tractors, as well as the use of hand and power tools. Some of the activities near construction areas may need to be done outside normal construction hours for safety reasons. Truck trips would be generated off-site by the transportation of contaminated and hydrocarbon affected soils and demolition materials. Estimated total round trips and peak day trips for the remediation component of the Project are summarized in Table 2-6 (ATE 2007). Table 2-6 Remediation Traffic Levels Phase/Activity Type of Vehicle Round Trips Total Round Trips Peak Day Remediation Retaining wall steel/concrete Truck 26 2 Reservoir 5 geotextile/gravel Truck 1,006 20 Reservoir 7 geotextile/gravel Truck 1,951 20 Reservoir 3 geotextile/gravel Truck 528 20 Reservoir 4 geotextile Truck 1 1 Demolition Truck 2,775 46 NHIS hauling Truck 13,125a 40 Import of gravel fill materials Truck 5,467 20 Equipment Delivery Truck 31 10 Personnel Auto 23,400 90 Total 45,685 269 Restoration Employees Auto 5,200 20 Redevelopment Construction Equipment Delivery Truck 24 10 Materials Delivery Truck 1,600 100 Employees Auto 39,000 150 Total 40,624 260 a. The Applicant has requested a 25 percent contingency be added to this number to account for the uncertainties associated with estimating impacted soil volumes for remediation projects. This would increase the number to 13,125 round trips. Sources: ATE 2007, Padre 2007, Padre 2009, Chevron 2007 & 2008, RAP AVOCET 2007 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-51 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Total export of affected materials is estimated at 157,000 cubic yards, or approximately 10,500 truck trips (round trips). Given the uncertainty with estimating the amount of affected soil from remediation activities, the Applicant has requested that the EIR include a 25 percent contingency. This contingency would increase the total exported affected material to 196,250 cubic yards, or approximately 13,125 truck trips (round trips). Total import of fill materials is estimated to be 82,000 cubic yards, and 5,467 truck trips (round trips, with an estimated distance of 54 miles round trip). Daily workers are estimated to generate up to 90 one-way trips per day. The Applicant’s schedule indicates that grading and remediation would take 2.5 years until completion. Grading and short-term remediation would occur in advance of the development phases of the Project. 2.3.11 Long-Term Monitoring Activities The Applicant proposes that once the caps and other short-term remedial actions have been implemented, the long-term monitoring and maintenance phase of Project Site closure would begin. Long-term monitoring is intended to ensure that those actions taken under the Project e.g., excavations, cap construction) continue to meet their remedial objectives. This is important, in that most of the affected materials onsite would remain after remediation is complete, especially in the former reservoirs. Therefore, periodic inspection and maintenance are necessary components of remediation. Inspection would primarily cover the engineered caps, habitat restoration and mitigation areas, and the open space caps and development caps. In general, the Applicant is proposing that inspections would occur periodically after a given remedial action is completed. The frequency of inspections is proposed to be quarterly for the first two years after construction and then as required by the RWQCB. The estimated annual round trips and peak day trips for the monitoring activities are provided in Table 2-7. Table 2-7 Monitoring Traffic Levels Phase/Activity Type of Vehicle Annual Round Trips Round Trips Peak (Day) Current Monitoring Groundwater monitoring Auto 104 2 Bird netting Auto 104 2 Total 208 4 Long-Term Monitoring Inspections Auto 16 4 Maintenance Truck 320 8 Total 336 12 Sources: ATE 2007, Padre 2007, Padre 2009, Chevron 2007 & 2008, RAP AVOCET 2007 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-52 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Inspections would, at a minimum, focus on the following: Signs of erosion or burrowing by animals; Recurrence of or new surface expressions of plastic hydrocarbon; Successful revegetation; Integrity of fencing and other onsite institutional controls; and Settlement. Most of these activities would be visual inspections by trained technicians or subject experts e.g., wetland restoration specialists). Settlement would be measured by properly trained technicians under the supervision of a surveyor or civil engineer licensed to practice in the state of California. Settlement measurements would monitor movement in the various caps. Inspections would look for resurfacing of plastic hydrocarbon expressions at the excavation locations, especially if material was left in place at depths greater than five feet. Inspections would also include other areas of the Project Site overlying affected soils and would look for new surface expressions. Further recurrence of a surface expression would prompt evaluation and a focused remedial action. Over time, the caps would require maintenance. It is expected that this would be minor in nature and would include activities such as repairing drainages and maintaining vegetation. Frequent maintenance, however, would be necessary for the storm water management features in the development areas. These include the surface mulching, cleaning of siltation basins, and periodic cleaning of the culverts located at the Northwest Area. More significant repairs would be made as needed, and would be based on observations made during the periodic inspections. This would include re-grading if low spots develop in caps for Reservoirs 5 and 7 to maintain drainage flow. Reservoir 3 will be restored as a wetland and settlement is not anticipated to require repair. The Applicant proposes that land use covenants be prepared for the various potential subdivisions of the Project Site. This would include not only potentially developable parcels, but also the open space areas. A land use covenant is a legal document that would accompany a parcel’s deed. It would be signed by representatives of the Applicant and the lead and responsible agencies (e.g., RWQCB), and would be notarized and recorded with the County Clerk/Recorder. It is intended to ensure that future owners of the properties understand what mechanisms are in place at the Project Site to protect human health and the environment, and to identify for future property owners their responsibilities in maintaining those protections. The specifics of land use covenants for the Project Site would vary depending on which parcel is under consideration. It would, however, identify the allowed land uses and would exclude uses that would be allowed under current or future land use planning but are inappropriate for the Project Site based on the level of remediation proposed by the Applicant and the amount of contamination proposed to be left over at the Project Site. The land use covenant would list the various caps and other containment features that must be maintained. It would be accompanied by various documents, such as guidelines for vapor barriers, Landscape Restoration Plan, and Soil Management Plan that are proposed by the Applicant to be prepared for the Project Site. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-53 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The land use covenant would also restrict the use of groundwater in areas of affected soil on the Project Site. The Applicant would work with adjacent landowners to establish covenants regarding soil and groundwater on adjacent properties affected by historical Project Site activities. A draft of the covenant limiting groundwater wells would be prepared by the Applicant for review by the RWQCB. Covenants related to land use will be reviewed and agreed upon by the lead municipality once the RAP has been ratified by the RWQCB. The covenants are proposed to be finalized prior to transfer of ownership. A conservation easement will transfer surface rights to open space property to the City, the County, or an appropriate land conservancy organization with a restrictive covenant limiting future uses. The conveyance would be made after the remediation of the open space property has been accepted by the appropriate agencies and an endowment or other funding mechanism is in place for future maintenance. 2.4 Restoration The Applicant proposes to restore areas affected by the proposed remediation activities, improve habitat function and value, improve hydrologic function and conform to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance. The Applicant has prepared a conceptual landscape restoration plan for the Project Site. The conceptual restoration plan was documented in the report by Padre and WSP titled “Landscape Restoration for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm: 75% Basis of Design Report” (Padre 2009). The report presents a landscape-level design at the 75 percent level of completion for the waters/wetlands, adjacent terrestrial ecosystems (i.e., uplands), and native special status plant and animal populations affected by the proposed remediation, site development, and landscape restoration. The Applicant prepared this document to provide guidance and a foundation in developing the final restoration plan. The general concepts of that document have been used in evaluating the environmental impacts of the Project. The specific details of the final restoration plan will be developed by a working subgroup of the Applicant and agency representatives to reach consensus between conflicting priorities and incorporate mitigation measures established by the environmental analysis. The following section provides a summary of the proposed design. The Applicant’s proposed restoration design is centered on the following major activities: Earthwork, including mass and fine grading, installation of microtopographic features e.g., wood structures, mounds, depressions, habitat logs); Planting and seeding; Irrigation; Weed control; and Maintenance, monitoring, and adaptive management. Restoration construction activities are proposed to be initiated and completed over two to three dry seasons (May to November). Some restoration activities are proposed to occur year-round. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-54 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The monitoring proposed by the Applicant would require a crew of two to four people walking the Project Site to identify vegetation growth and the status of caps and various remediation projects. A crew of six to eight people working an average of 10 days per quarter would conduct periodic maintenance (e.g., weed control, plant replacement). 2.4.1 Earthwork The earthwork includes both mass and fine grading techniques to re-create or mimic where possible natural features and transitions within the landscape. Specifically, grading would restore portions of the Project Site to natural forms and function, targeting the (re)establishment of important hydrologic processes and the partial structure of faunal habitats (e.g., landscape hydrologic connectivity and creation of smooth transitions within and among wetland classes and adjacent upland habitats). During mass grading the soil would be prepared as a planting environment, and weeds and surficial weed seed banks would be removed. Fine grading activities would include the creation of habitats for threatened and endangered plant and animal species. Figure 2-15 shows the proposed conceptual restoration plan. The conceptual grading plans associated with the restoration are shown in Appendix A.3, pages A.3-1 through A.3-3. The Applicant is proposing to re-align Tank Farm Creek consistent with the City’s Waterway Management Plan so as to improve the poor hydrologic function that results from its existing configuration. The east and west forks of Tank Farm Creek would be routed into the North Marsh. The dual round culverts that cross under Tank Farm Road would be abandoned, and a weir installed in box culverts forcing water to pond in the North Marsh, thereby reducing the magnitude of the peak flow for a given precipitation event and delaying its arrival at the site discharge point to the south. In addition, two 12-inch diameter outlets would be bored near the bottom of the existing headwall for Tank Farm Creek to improve the flow of water south of Tank Farm Road. Boring of these two outlets would require work to occur off-site. Appendix F, Hydrology Study, contains additional information and figures showing the proposed modifications to Tank Farm Creek that would occur with the Project. Tank Farm Creek would be relocated to follow the course of the former auxiliary channel (away from the western property line), and a low-flow outlet would be installed within the existing culvert so that it releases water in a controlled manner earlier in a storm, further reducing demand on the limited storage capacity south of Tank Farm Road. In the southeastern portion of the site, specifically in two areas adjacent to San Luis Obispo Creek, two creek meanders have been historically cut-off from the main channel system by levee construction. However, the fundamental geometry of the meanders is intact. The Applicant proposes to remove the upstream and downstream earthen “plugs” that separate the meanders from the east fork of the San Luis Obispo Creek channel system, and thus re-engage them through grading and re-contouring of the channels based on the historical contours of the creek system and hydrological studies. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-55 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-15 Conceptual Restoration Plan Source: LRP Padre 2009 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-56 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR To protect civil structures (e.g., bridge abutments, instrument landing strip structures), grading, slope hardening with rip-rap, and installation of some log deflection structures would occur. After mass and fine grading as discussed, and prior to planting, finish grade soils would be ripped and plowed to a depth of approximately 12 inches. The goal of the ripping and soil aerating (lofting) operation would be to decrease soil compaction, increase soil aeration porosity, and improve conditions for planting. No ripping or lofting would occur on soil surfaces intentionally compacted to encourage ponding of water (e.g., depression bottoms) or amended to encourage colonization of species of conservation concern. After ripping and lofting of finish grades, interim sediment and erosion control systems would be installed on restoration areas. BMPs would be used including installation of rock aprons to protect high energy storm water outfall locations, degradable geotextile (e.g., coir cloth) covers on high energy or highly erosive slopes or creek meanders, lifts of sterile straw, hydroseeding with native plant mixes and tackifier, coir rolls, and sediment traps. The location of the sediment control features is shown in Appendix A.3, pages A.3-4 though A.3-7. 2.4.2 Planting and Seeding Restoration planting would be conducted to maintain consistency with native plant community structure and composition at the site. A native plant nursery would be established to provide planting stock suited to the restoration site and to better control planting schedules and logistics. Seed collecting would be conducted on-site, and off-site, as necessary, to assist in re- establishment of locally adapted native plants. Planting may be conducted in phases to allow shade-tolerant species to be installed after initial plantings have been conducted in certain plant communities (e.g., tree and shrub layer development). 2.4.3 Irrigation Irrigation systems would be installed at the nursery area, once established on-site, to ensure appropriate irrigation of container plants. Planting would be conducted in the fall, as feasible, to allow for, watering, from rainfall. Irrigation systems may be installed in other specific areas to ensure appropriate moisture levels. 2.4.4 Weed Control Weed control efforts are proposed by the Applicant, to be adapted as needed, using an integrated program that includes initial clearing, grubbing and stripping, mowing, hand weeding, weed- whacking, re-planting or inter-planting additional plants, and use of herbicides, as necessary. Weed control would be conducted within restoration areas as part of the construction, monitoring, maintenance, and adaptive management activities until restoration performance criteria are met. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-57 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.5 Development Options Subsequent to completion of the remediation component of the Project, the Applicant proposes to develop the Project Site consistent with existing plans and proposed amendments to land use plans for the area (e.g., AASP, Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP), and County General Plan). Two development proposals are being considered concurrently; a City Development Plan and a County Development Plan. One or the other would be implemented depending on whether the Project Site is annexed by the City or if it remains within County jurisdiction. Each of the two development plans are discussed below. 2.5.1 City Development Plan At present, the Project Site is located within the unincorporated County. It has been proposed, however, that the Project Site be annexed into the City as part of the AASP. As part of the Project, AASP amendments are proposed to relocate some of the anticipated development in order to avoid high value ecological areas. The City Development Plan proposes development of the Project Site with approximately 803,000 square feet of commercial and industrial floor area with associated parking, landscaping, open space, recreational playing fields, bicycle and pedestrian trails. The City Development Plan could also include land for the City to construct public facilities such as a transit maintenance yard and storage facility or a fire station and training facility. The development would be phased over a 25-year period, and implemented in five phases, with each phase lasting five years. The Project Site would carry the City Land Use Zoning designations of Business Park (BP-SP), Service-Commercial (C-S-SP) (which includes repair and maintenance services, and light manufacturing), Public Facilities (P-F), and Conservation Open Space (C/OS-SP). 2.5.1.1 City Development Plan Overview Although the Project Site is presently within the unincorporated County, it also lies within the City’s sphere of influence. The Project Site is designated for annexation to the City in accordance with the City’s AASP, dated August 2005. The central focus of the City’s AASP is to restore and remediate the 332-acre Project Site (approximately one-third of the Airport Area) to include a permanent ecological preserve and facilitate new development, renovation, and redevelopment of existing development in the planning area. The AASP provides additional guidance and planning for the area surrounding and including the Project Site; and complements the adjacent Margarita Area Specific Plan, which addresses the area immediately north of the Project Site. Figure 2-16 shows the zoning for the Project Site under the current AASP. Figures 2-17 and 2-18 show the proposed City Development Plan and the proposed zoning for the Project Site under the City Development Plan. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-58 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-16 Project Site Zoning Designations under the Existing City AASP Note: Figure reflects zoning and proposed roadways as depicted in the AASP. Source: PEP Chevron 2007; MRS 2012 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-59 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-17 Proposed City Development Plan Source: PEP Chevron 2007 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-60 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-18 Project Site Zoning Designations under the City Development Plan - Proposed Zoning Designations and Bike Paths Source: Modified from Chevron 12/10/2009 Bike path Plan by RRM; MRS 2012 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-61 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-18 shows the proposed zoning for the Project Site under the City Development Plan. The proposed land uses under the City Development Plan include 27.85 acres of Business Park development, 26.01 acres of Service-Commercial development, 15.05 acres of Public Facilities intended for recreational ball fields, 13.62 acres of public Right-of-Way (e.g., streets), and the approximately 250-acre balance as Conservation/Open Space (see Figure 2-17). The Applicant proposes amendments to the AASP to incorporate changes that have resulted from more recent information uncovered as part of recent studies conducted for the Project since the AASP was adopted, and to accommodate the Project as proposed. As compared with the AASP, the Applicant-proposed City Development Plan trades approximately nine acres of developable area in the northwest portion of the Project Site and on the west edge of the area south of Tank Farm Road for 16 acres in the northeast portion of the Project Site (refer to Figures 2-16 and 2-18). The City Development Plan proposes the following zoning designations: Business Park BP-SP): 27.85 acres with approximately 433,000 square feet of floor space for business park land, located at the northeastern portion the Project Site. Access would be from the proposed extension of Santa Fe Road. It is envisioned that this area would be developed with a campus-like business park. Service-Commercial C-S-SP): 26.01 acres with approximately 370,000 square feet for Service-Commercial uses located mostly within the Tank Farm Road Corridor. Access to the western Service and Manufacturing areas would be from Tank Farm Road. Services and Manufacturing uses to the east would be accessed from Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road, and a new local road. Conservation/Open Space C/OS-SP): 249.84 acres designated as Conservation/Open Space on both sides of Tank Farm Road that would serve as Airport Reserve Spaces. The Applicant has proposed off-street bike trails in the open space areas (see Figure 2-18). The Applicant has not proposed any public trails within the open space areas south of Tank Farm Road. At some point in the future the Applicant may dedicate the open space land to a municipality or non-governmental organization (NGO). Public Facilities Approximately 12.5 acres would be used for streets, sidewalks, and other frontage improvements, including about six acres dedicated to the widening of Tank Farm Road. The Unocal Collector” street is proposed to be eliminated due to environmental constraints. The right-of-way areas would also include bike lanes on both sides of Tank Farm Road and along Santa Fe Road north of Tank Farm Road as well as bike paths within the proposed development some of which are in different locations than called for in the AASP. The road improvements include ingress and egress improvements into the proposed development, widening of Tank Farm Road to a 100-foot right-of-way with a landscaped median restricting left turn movements, and providing sidewalks, curbs, and gutters. PF-SP): 15.05 acres located immediately west of the 26-acre area proposed for Service-Commercial may be used as active sports fields or other public use. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-62 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR A DA has been proposed by the Applicant to address the applicable fees and development conditions for the life of the Project and to extend tentative map approval out to 25 years based on the Applicant-proposed phasing. The City would provide water, sewer, and public services such as police and fire. The City recently installed a sewer trunk line in Tank Farm Road along the property’s frontage (July 2009). The Applicant would extend the potable and recycled water mains and utilities to the developable areas as well as relocate electrical and telecommunication lines in the area Table 2-8 summarizes the key aspects of the proposed City Development Plan. Table 2-8 City Development Plan Summary Zoning Designation City Development Plan Business Park 27.85 acres 10 lots 433,000ft2 of building space Service-Commercial 26.01 acres 6 lots 370,000 ft2 of building space Conservation/Open Space 249.84 acres for Airport Reserve Space Public Facilities/Recreation 15.05 acres for recreation and City facilities. Remaining Acreage Right-of-Way 13.62 acres with 6.06 acres for Tank Farm Road widening. The Applicant has not proposed specific land uses for the various zoning designations since the Project would be built over a 25-year period. Economic and market forces would drive the type of land uses that could be built in each the zoning designations. The AASP provides a list allowable land uses for each of zoning designations. In addition, the ALUP provides guidance on what types of land uses are allowed within each airport safety zone. As part of the EIR process the City, County, and Applicant developed a possible list of land uses that could be developed on the site taking into account the allowable land uses specified in the AASP and ALUP. Table 2-9 provides the list of possible land uses for each zoning designation. The land uses were selected to represent a wide range of possible uses that would generate a reasonable worst-case level of traffic and other issue area impacts. Since the tenants have not yet been established, there is potential variation on the types and size of each of these uses. However, the parameters provided in Table 2-9 are anticipated to encompass most development scenarios. The land uses have been selected as conservative estimates and are likely the most intensive uses for the Project Site in order to evaluate a scenario that produces the highest level of impact for analysis in this EIR. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-63 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-9 Possible Development Land Use Mix- City Development Option Zoning Designation Possible Land Use Square Footage Business Park Business Park (Offices) 348,000 Printing and Publishing 10,000 Hotel (115 rooms) 70,000 Specialized Education /Training Facility 5,000 Service-Commercial Light Manufacturing 170,000 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 General Retail 15,000 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 20,000 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 Public-Facility Recreational Fields 15 acres Baseball Fields A conceptual site plan prepared by the Cal Ripken Baseball Association has been submitted to the Applicant for the development of baseball fields and associated facilities on the Project Site. The fields would be located on the north side of Tank Farm Road (see Figure 2-18). Figure 2-19 shows a possible site plan for the baseball fields. The proposed ballfield project area would be rezoned as a part of the Project with implementation to be completed by the Cal Ripken Baseball Association at a future date. The Applicant’s involvement with the Cal Ripken project is limited to donation of the property. The area would be comprised of up to three baseball fields and amenities that may include the following characteristics: A 3.39 acre championship baseball field with sports lighting, scoreboard, built in terrace seating, and bleachers; A 2.40 acre baseball field with lighting, scoreboard, bleachers, and scorekeepers booth; A 2.48 acre flexible use field (Baseball and Softball) with scoreboard, bleachers, and scorekeepers booth; Batting cages totaling 3,500 square feet; Restrooms, a plaza, and a playground totaling 17,000 square feet; Parking area totaling 45,000 square feet; and Open grass areas for team warm up, general use, picnic tables, and benches totaling 5.43 acres. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-64 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-19 Possible Sports Fields Configuration Source: Cal Ripken Baseball; MRS 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-65 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Roadway Improvements Improvements and modifications would be made to existing roadways in the Project area. Also, new roads would be installed and associated tie-ins to existing roadways infrastructure would occur. Detailed drawings associated with these portions of the Project are provided in Appendix A.3, pages A.3-10 through A.3-12. A summary of the various road improvements are discussed below. Tank Farm Road is proposed to be reconstructed including the following elements: Widen road to four lanes from Acacia Creek in the east to the western boundary of the property; Construct a 14-foot wide landscaped median; Underground existing power lines adjacent to the project development frontage; Installation of on-street bike lanes on both sides of roadway from Santa Fe Road to western Business Park land use area; Construct a twelve-foot wide multi-use pathway/bikeway on the north side of the road from Santa Fe Road to the western Business Park land use area; and, Install culverts and improvements to drainage systems. Appendix A.3, pages A.3-10 though A.3-12, provides detailed drawings showing the proposed improvements to Tank Farm Road. Santa Fe Road south of Tank Farm Road currently is a two-lane road ending at Tank Farm Road with a stop sign. Santa Fe Road, south of Tank Farm Road, would be re-aligned and tied into Tank Farm Road and include the following elements: The re-aligned segment of Santa Fe Road from the east fork of San Luis Obispo Creek north to Tank Farm Road would be four lanes wide with sidewalks on both sides; A traffic signal would be installed at the intersection of Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road; An arched culvert would be constructed over the east fork of San Luis Obispo Creek; A multi-use off-street bike path would be constructed along the west side of Santa Fe Road realignment; and An on-street bike path would be installed on both sides of Santa Fe Road. Appendix A.3, pages A.3-11 though A.3-12, provides detailed drawings showing the proposed improvements to Santa Fe Road. New roads would be constructed north of Tank Farm Road, including: A one-quarter mile extension of Santa Fe Road continuing north of Tank Farm Road as a four lane road with on-street bike lanes on each side and a 14-foot landscaped median; Construction of the two lane “A” Road north of Tank Farm Road off of Santa Fe Road approximately 300 feet long); and Construction of a 0.3-mile two lane “B” Road that intersects with Tank Farm Road west of the Santa Fe intersection curving east to intersect with the new Santa Fe Road. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-66 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Appendix A.3, page A.3-11, provides detailed drawings showing the proposed new roads to be constructed north of Tank Farm Road. 2.5.1.2 City Development Plan – Construction Phase Construction is proposed to take place in five phases, with each phase lasting approximately five years, for a total duration of 25 years. Development phases would begin once the remediation component of the Project is completed. Figure 2-20 shows the location of the preliminary phases; however, the order in which these phases are developed and the timing of their development may be altered as the result of future market conditions and demand. Build-out of the City Development Plan would involve finish grading followed by construction of commercial, industrial, retail and recreational structures. The most intense activity would be generated during the initial phases of site preparation when large areas of soil would be disturbed and many large construction vehicles would be operating. Site grading would be completed during the remediation phase and minimal site grading would need to be conducted with each phase of development. An estimated 1,600 truck trips (round trips) for each phase would be required to deliver materials and equipment to the Project Site. A total of 150 construction workers would be associated with each phase. Table 2-10 summarizes the necessary construction equipment for the development component of the Project. Table 2-10 Development Construction Equipment (per phase) Equipment Type Number Required Scrapers 3 Dozers 2 Loader 2 Excavator 1 Grader 1 Water truck 1 Pavers 3 Rollers 2 Forklifts 3 Backhoes 3 Crane 1 Generator set 1 Welder 1 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-67 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-20 City Development Option Phasing Source: Chevron 2005 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-68 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.5.1.3 City Development Plan – Operational Phase Once the City Development Plan is completely built-out, there would be an increase in traffic associated with the development and an increase in water use. Table 2-11 shows the traffic levels generated by each phase of the Project. Table 2-12 shows the estimated water use and the traffic generated at Project build-out in an estimated 25 years. The traffic levels in the tables are based on the land uses associated with each phase and corresponding trip generation rates. Traffic levels are estimated based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. Water use rates in Table 2-12 are based on water use factors provided by the City Utilities Department. Table 2-11 City Development Plan Traffic Generation by Phase Phase Weekday Average Daily OW Trips per Phase Weekend Average Daily OW Trips per Phase Weekday Average Daily OW Trips Cumulative Weekend Average Daily OW Trips Cumulative 1 1,828 1,859 1,828 1,859 2 1,874 586 3,701 2,446 3 1,268 647 4,969 3,093 4 686 248 5,655 3,341 5 2,302 895 7,957 4,236 Source: Traffic generated by phase is based on the acres developed for each phase shown in the Figure 2-20 phase maps and the use factors shown in Table 2-10. OW refers to one-way trips. 2.5.2 County Development Plan The County Development Plan is similar to the City Development Plan with the primary difference being that the County Development Plan proposes more rapid (Phase 1) development of the eastern end of the Project Site (south of Tank Farm Road), where approximately one acre of land designated as Industrial, would be used to construct an on-site wastewater treatment facility. Figure 2-21 shows the existing County zoning designations and Figure 2-22 shows the proposed Project’s zoning designations for the County Development Plan. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-69 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-12 City Development Plan Possible Build-Out – Water Use and Traffic Type Floor Area square feet) Water Use Factor per 1,000 square feet) Water Use acre feet/ year) Weekday Trip Generation per 1,000 square feet) Weekend Trip Generation per 1,000 square feet) Weekday Average Daily OW Trips Weekend Average Daily OW Trips Light Manufacturing 170,000 0.071 12.1 3.82 1.49 649 253 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 0.1 5.0 6.96 2.49 348 125 Business Park (Offices) 348,000 0.066 23.0 11.42 1.64 3,974 571 General Retail 15,000 0.008 0.1 42.94 49.97 644 750 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 20,000 0.03 0.6 31.60 15.86 632 317 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 0.2 1.0 44.00 88.00 220 440 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 0.071 0.7 6.97 1.32 70 13 Printing and Publishing 10,000 0.071 0.7 6.97 1.32 70 13 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 0.029 1.5 2.50 2.33 125 117 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 0.029 1.5 6.97 1.32 349 66 Hotel (115 rooms) 70,000 0.43 49.5 8.17 8.19 572 573 Specialized Adult Education /Training Facility 5,000 0.066 0.3 24.00 8.00 120 40 Public Transit Maintenance and Storage Facilitya 10,000 0.023 0.2 4.49 1.13 45 11 Public Fire Station and Training Facilitya 5,000 0.064 0.3 16.00 16.00 80 80 Recreational Fields (15 acres) -- 1.4 per acre 21.0 4.00 57.80 60 867 Total 818,000 117.4 7,957 4,236 a. The Public Transit Maintenance and Storage and Public Fire Station/Training Facilities would be built by the City on land provided by the Applicant. The Applicant’s development would be 803,000 square feet. Source: Water Use Factors based on the City Utilities Department. Trip Generation Rates from ITE 8th Edition except Specialized Education from San Diego Association of Governments Rates (SANDAG), Transit Maintenance & Fire Station. Public Transit Maintenance based upon LA County Metro Analysis for Division 13, 2008. Fire Station and Training Facility based upon anticipated high usage day. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-70 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-21 Existing County Land Use Designations Source: Chevron 2007; MRS 2012 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-71 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-22 Proposed County Land Use Designations Source: Chevron 2007; MRS 2012 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-72 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Applicant’s goal under the County Development Plan would be to develop a portion of the Project Site with an approximate 803,000 square feet (floor area) for commercial and industrial services with associated parking, landscaping, open space, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and amenities (the same amount as the City Plan). Areas of development would be executed in five phases over a period of 25 years with each phase developing approximately 160,000 square feet of leasable floor area and taking five years to build-out. The County Development Plan would include zoning designations of Commercial Service (CS), Industrial (I), and Recreational (REC). The County Development Plan proposes transferring the development potential of the Industrial-zoned land identified in the County General Plan (north of the Northwest Operations Area) to the northeastern portion of the Project Site. 2.5.2.1 County Development Plan Overview The County General Plan identifies development on portions of the Project Site. Possible development areas under the County General Plan are situated on the east and west ends of the northern portion of the Project Site, north of Tank Farm Road. Figures 2-21 and 2-22 show the current County land uses for the Project Site and the proposed land uses under the County Development Plan respectively. The County Development Plan proposes the following land use designations: Commercial Service (CS)26.56 acres with approximately 433,000 square feet of floor space located at the northeastern portion the Project Site. Access would be from the proposed extension of Santa Fe Road. The Waste Water Treatment Facility (WWTF) would be located on property with this land use designation south of Tank Farm Road. Industrial I): 27.29 acres with approximately 370,000 square feet for Industrial uses located mostly within the Tank Farm Road Corridor, and to the north of Tank Farm Road on the eastern side of the Project Site. Access to the western Industrial area would be from Tank Farm Road. Industrial uses to the east would be accessed from Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road, and a new local road. Recreation (REC) The County Development Plan would require an amendment to the AASP by the City, an amendment of the County General Plan, a subdivision of existing parcels, and a Conditional Use Permit. The road improvements include ingress and egress improvements into the Project Site, improve Tank Farm Road to a 100-foot right-of-way, and provide sidewalks, curbs, and gutters. Details on road improvements are the same as those described under the City Development Plan in Section 2.5.1.1. 249.84 acres on both sides of Tank Farm Road that would serve as open space, while 15.05 acres are proposed to be used as active sports fields. The Applicant has proposed off-street bike trails in the open space areas (see Figure 2-18). The Applicant has not proposed any public trails within the open space areas south of Tank Farm Road. At some point in the future the Applicant may dedicate the open space land to a municipality or NGO. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-73 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The County Development Plan includes the construction of a wastewater treatment facility, and on-site wells to provide sewer and water, respectively, to the development of the Project Site. The location of the proposed wastewater treatment facility is shown in Figure 2-22. The proposed wastewater treatment design considered numerous effluent disposal options, including leach fields, spray fields, constructed wetlands, polishing wetlands and live stream discharge. The wastewater treatment and disposal feasibility assessment (Appendix A.2) analyzed each option and determined that the two viable effluent disposal options were polishing wetlands and live stream discharge to the east fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. With the polishing wetland land option, the wetlands would be placed in a portion of the proposed baseball fields, which would reduce the size of the baseball fields by approximately two acres (from 15 acres to 13 acres) in the County development option. For the purposes of the EIR analysis, it has been assumed the baseball fields would be 15 acres, since this would represent a reasonable worst-case analysis. The Project would include approximately 14 acres for streets, sidewalks, bike lanes and other frontage improvements. Bike lanes would be the same as shown in the City Development Plan see Figure 2-18). CALFIRE would provide fire protection services, the County Sheriff would provide police services, and existing area service providers would provide utilities. The Cal Ripken baseball proposal, described with the City Development Plan, would most likely be similar to that proposed for the County Development Plan. Table 2-13 provides a summary of the key aspects of the County Development Plan. Table 2-13 County Development Plan Summary Land Use Designation County Development Plan Commercial Service 26.56 acres 8 lots 433,000ft2 of building space wastewater treatment facility water well Industrial 27.29 acres 5 lots 370,000 ft2 of building space Recreation 249.84 acres of open space. 15.05 acres as active sports fields. Remaining Acreage Right-of-Way 13.63 acres with 6.06 acres for Tank Farm Road widening Source: Chevron 2007 The Applicant has not proposed specific land uses for the various zoning designations since the Project would be built over a 25-year period. Economic and market forces would drive the type of development that could be built in each of the land use designations. The County Zoning Ordinance provides a list allowable uses for each of the zoning classifications. In addition, the ALUP provides guidance on what types of land uses are allowed within each airport safety zone. As part of the EIR process the City, County, and Applicant developed a possible list of uses that could be developed on the site taking into account the allowable land uses specified in the County Land Use Ordinances and ALUP. Table 2-14 provides the list of possible land uses for each zoning designation. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-74 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-14 Possible Development Land Use Mix- County Development Option Land Use Designation Possible Zoning Square Footage Commercial Service Business Park (Offices) 348,000 General Retail 15,000 Hotel (115 rooms) 70,000 Wastewater Treatment Facility 1 acre Industrial Light Manufacturing 170,000 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 20,000 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 Printing and Publishing 10,000 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 Specialized Education/Training Facility 5,000 Recreation Recreational Fields 15 acres Possible land uses developed as part of the EIR process. The land uses were selected to represent a wide range of possible uses that would generate a reasonable worst case level of traffic and other issue area impacts. Since the tenants have not yet been established, there is a potential variation on types and size of each of these uses. However, the parameters provided in Table 2-14 are anticipated to encompass most development scenarios. The land uses have been selected as conservative estimates and are likely the most intensive uses for the Project Site in order to evaluate a scenario that produces the highest level of impact for analysis in this EIR. 2.5.2.2 County Development Plan – Construction Phase Project Site construction would require the same level of effort as the City Development Plan with the exception of construction of the WWTF, which would occur within a 1.1 acre area just south of Tank Farm Road. Phasing would be similar to the City Development Plan except that a small section of the eastern area of the Project Site would be developed in Phase 2, rather than in Phase 1. Figure 2-23 shows the County Development Plan phases. An on-site water system is also part of the County Development Plan. Build-out under the County Development Plan would involve finish grading followed by construction of commercial, industrial, retail, and recreational structures. The Applicant estimates that construction of each phase would take five years. Site grading would be achieved during the remediation component of the Project and only minimal site grading would need to be conducted with each phase of construction. An estimated 1,600 truck trips (round trips) for each phase would be required to deliver materials and equipment to the Project Site. A total of 150 construction workers would be associated with each phase. A summary of the necessary construction equipment for the development component of the Project is provided in Table 2-10. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-75 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-23 County Development Option Phasing Source: Chevron 2005 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-76 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.5.2.3 County Development Plan – Operational Phase The County Development Plan operation phase would be similar to the City option, with some additional traffic due to operation and maintenance of the WWTF. Table 2-15 shows the traffic levels generated by each phase of the Project. The traffic levels are based on the land uses associated with each phase and corresponding trip generation rates. Table 2-15 County Development Plan Traffic Generation by Phase Phase Weekday Average Daily OWa Trips per Phase Weekend Average Daily OW Trips, per Phase Weekday Average Daily OW Trips Cumulative Weekend Average Daily OW Trips, Cumulative 1 1,669 1,614 1,669 1,614 2 1,964 611 3,633 2,225 3 1,426 698 5,059 2,923 4 530 189 5,589 3,112 5 2,254 815 7,843 3,927 a. OW refers to one-way trips. Table 2-16 summarizes the traffic and water requirements associated with build-out under the County Development Plan. The Applicant indicates that cattle grazing may continue in open space areas of the Project Site. It is expected that cattle grazing would be limited to grassland areas and excluded from upland and wetland restoration areas. Specific requirements for continued cattle grazing would be coordinated with the CDFW, the RWQCB, the County’s Agricultural Commissioner’s Office, and the USFWS. 2.6 Project Permitting Requirements 2.6.1 City Development Plan 2.6.1.1 Airport Area Specific Plan Amendment The Project Site is located within the City’s AASP, which has been identified for future annexation by the City. In October 2004, the City adopted the AASP and associated Final EIR. The City’s AASP establishes the framework for developing these properties and contains goals, policies, and standards for land uses, circulation, public service and facilities, and utilities. The AASP EIR established measures to mitigate impacts. Approval of the Project would require concurrent or subsequent amendment of the City’s AASP for which the City is the lead agency. The proposed land use amendments trade acreage on the west side, for additional acreage on the east that would utilize the infrastructure accompanying extension of Santa Fe Road and widening of Tank Farm Road. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-77 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-16 County Development Plan Possible Build-Out – Water Use and Traffic Type Floor Area square feet) Water Use Factor per 1,000 square feet) Water Use acre feet/ year) Weekday Trip Generation per 1,000 square feet) Weekend Trip Generation per 1,000 square feet) Weekday Average Daily OW Trips Weekend Average Daily OW Trips Light Manufacturing 170,000 0.071 12.1 3.82 1.49 649.4 253.3 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 0.1 5.0 6.96 2.49 348.0 124.5 Business Park (Offices) 348,000 0.066 23.0 11.42 1.64 3,974.2 570.7 General Retail 15,000 0.008 0.1 42.94 49.97 644.1 749.6 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance –Major 20,000 0.03 0.6 31.60 15.86 632.0 317.2 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 0.2 1.0 44.00 88.00 220.0 440.0 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 0.071 0.7 6.97 1.32 69.7 13.2 Printing and Publishing 10,000 0.071 0.7 6.97 1.32 69.7 13.2 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 0.029 1.5 2.50 2.33 125.0 116.5 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 0.029 1.5 6.97 1.32 348.5 66.0 Hotel (115 room) 70,000 0.43 49.5 8.17 8.19 571.9 573.3 Specialized Adult Education /Training Facility 5,000 0.066 0.3 24.00 8.00 120.0 40.0 Water Treatment Facility (1 acre) -- 1.4 per acre 2.8 6.75 3.38 27.0 13.5 Recreational Fields (15 acres) -- 1.4 per acre 21.0 4.00 57.80 44.0 635.8 Total 803,000 119.7 7,843 3,927 Source: Water Use Factors based on City of SLO Utilities Department. Trip Generation Rates from ITE 8th Edition except Specialized Education from San Diego Association of Governments Rates (SANDAG), Transit Maintenance & Fire Station. Public Transit Maintenance based upon LA County Metro Analysis for Division 13, 2008. Fire Station and Training Facility based upon anticipated high usage day. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-78 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City’s AASP, specific to the Project Site, designates 51 acres for Service-Commercial, three acres for Business Park, 278 acres in Conservation/Open Space, and the remaining acreage used for streets or public right-of-way. The Project includes AASP amendments for the Project Site that would result in 26 acres of Service-Commercial, 27 acres of Business Park, 15 acres of Public Facility, and 250 acres designated as Conservation/Open Space. Remaining acreage would be used for public right-of- way. Table 2-17 compares existing and proposed land uses for the Project Site. Table 2-17 San Luis Obispo City Development Plan Comparison of Existing AASP and Proposed Land Uses and Acreage for the Project Site Land Use Designation Land Area Existing AASP Acres % Proposed Acres % Business Park 3 1 27 8 Service-Commercial 52 16 26 8 Public Facility/Recreation 0 0 15 5 Conservation/Open Space 265 80 250 75 Streets, Right-of-Waya 12 4 14 4 Total 332 100 332 100 a. Streets, Right-of-Way, etc. equals Total Project-Total Parcels. Other AASP amendments include: Removing the Service-Commercial designation on approximately 8.6 acres in the northwest corner of the Project Site; Eliminating or relocating the collector street (known as the Unocal Collector) along the western and northern edges of the Project Site, which would also include removing underlying planned utilities and realigning the sewer trunk line located within the collector street’s right-of-way; Providing an additional driveway connection to Tank Farm Road just east of the existing driveway entrance to the Tank Farm offices. The location of the proposed driveway entrance is shown in Appendix A.3, page A.3-10; Installation of a signalized intersection at Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road (the AASP calls for the use of a roundabout at this intersection); and Revisions to appropriate text, tables, and graphics to reflect land use and circulation changes, including: o Land Use areas designations amended to reflect the acreages as described for the Project; o Plan Area Zoning amended to reflect the acreages as described for the Project; o Primary Circulation System and Functional Classifications within AASP Area and Surrounding Community amended to Proposed Primary Circulation System and Functional Classifications; 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-79 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR o Bicycle Plan amendment consisting of eliminating the Class I bikeway on the south side of Tank Farm Road, eliminating the Class I bike path connecting Tank Farm Road to Buckley Road along Tank Farm Creek, The bike lanes along the Unocal Collector Road (this road would not be built as part of the Project), and realignment of some of the bike paths shown in the Bicycle Transportation Plan. o Modify southern side of Tank Farm Road street section to remove sidewalk and Class I path and include a 12-foot wide Class I multi-use path on the north side of Tank Farm Road; o Update to the AASP cluster development zone evaluation; and o Update information and mitigations related to environmental issues. As part of the AASP amendments, the City is proposing to modify the Cluster Development Zone boundaries. The amendments would involve removing approximately 100 acres of Service- Commercial and approximately 25 acres of Conservation/Open Space land from the southeast corner just east of the SLOCRA. This area would be removed since the County has already approved development in the majority of this area. Figure 2-24 shows the proposed boundaries of the Cluster Development Zone as well as the proposed zoning designations. The City is also proposing to modify the allowable land uses in the AASP to make them consistent with the ALUP. 2.6.1.2 General Plan Amendment Approval of the AASP amendments would require an amendment of the City’s General Plan Land Use Policy map to maintain consistency between the two documents. The resulting General Plan Amendment would be processed by the City subsequent to or concurrent with Project approval. 2.6.1.3 Airport Compatibility Open Space Plan (ACOS) Amendments The Airport Compatibility Open Space Plan (ACOS) establishes open spaces in the areas around the SLOCRA that can serve as reserve spaces. Reserve space improves airport safety by allowing for more intense development of urban areas while keeping certain land adjacent to the airport free and clear from obstruction or from buildings and uses where people congregate. The areas identified as reserve space in the ACOS include land that is close to the airport, in-line with the main airport runway, or along an over-flight area where aircraft typically operate at lower altitudes. Identification of these areas in the ACOS plan simply adds airport safety to the list of reasons why these lands should not be developed. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-80 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-24 Proposed Modification to the AASP Cluster Development Zone (CDZ) with Proposed Project Zoning 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-81 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The ACOS identifies two reserve spaces within the Project Site (Airport Area 1 and Airport Area 2). The Airport Area 1 reserve space is connected to Margarita Area reserve space. The City is proposing to change the boundaries of the two reserves spaces on the Project Site to: (1) remove some of the proposed development from the current reserve space, (2) to incorporate all of the proposed Project open space, and (3) to split the Margarita Area and Airport Area 1 reserve spaces. Figure 2-25 shows the proposed changes to the ACOS reserve space boundaries, including the proposed relocation of Reserve Area B and Reserve Area C. The proposed ACOS Amendment would be processed by the City subsequent to or concurrent with Project approval. Within each reserve space, the ACOS Plan identifies two reserve areas that would comply with more stringent restrictive development standards. Each reserve area designated as Reserve Area B within the ACOS Plan, encompasses an area 1,000 feet long by 60 feet wide where no streets, parking lots, fences, light poles, trees, or fixed athletic equipment would be constructed. Within each Reserve Area B is a smaller, more restrictive area, designated as Reserve Area C within the ACOS Plan, measuring 800 feet long by 30 feet wide where no staked crops or headstones would be allowed. In order to conform to the restrictions for land use outlined in the ACOS Plan for the reserve areas, the Final Restoration Plan for the site will omit planting of trees within each designated area. In addition to development restrictions, each reserve area would be required to have a maximum ground slope of five percent to increase safety in the event an aircraft should make an emergency landing within a reserve area. The Applicant has proposed relocating the two Reserve Areas. The proposed new locations for the reserve areas are shown Figure 2-26. Currently, the 2005 ACOS Plan identifies Reserve Area #1 as an area on the north side of Tank Farm Road passing through an existing tank berm, as well as the proposed location of the onsite nursery, which is expected to be functional and in use through the coming years. Keeping the reserve area in this location would require a moderate amount of grading to remove a portion of the tank berm to meet the five percent slope requirement. In response to this, the Applicant proposes to move Reserve Area #1 to the west while maintaining the original angle of approach parallel to the airport runway so that it falls within the area designated as the North Marsh Figure 2-26). Designating this area as a reserve area will require no further grading than that which is currently planned for remediation and restoration while allowing the future onsite nursery to remain in its current proposed location. The Reserve Area #2 identified in the 2005 ACOS Plan is proposed to run north-south between Reservoirs 5 and 2 (see Figure 2-26). With the 2005 ACOS Plan location, a small amount of grading would be required within areas designated as VPFS habitat. In an effort to eliminate grading in VPFS habitat, the Applicant proposes to reorient Reserve Area #2 to be in line with the existing airport runway approach while shifting the location to the northeast. A moderate amount of grading will be required to meet the five percent ground slope requirement in this area. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-82 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-25 Proposed Modification to ACOS Reserve Spaces 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-83 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-26 Proposed ACOS Reserve Area Location Site Plan Source: Avocet 2012 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-84 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The preliminary grading plan for the proposed Reserve Area #2 consists of removing a portion of the existing berm adjacent to Tank Farm Road, removing a small hill along the existing site access road, locally widening an existing drainage swale, and re-grading a portion of the Reservoir 2 berm to meet a five percent maximum slope requirement within the reserve area. The total area of disturbance is approximately 1.9 acres of which approximately 1.1 acres are in addition to disturbance areas associated with work proposed for Reservoir 2, which is discussed in Section 2.3.6. Grading activities are expected to move approximately 4,400 cubic yards of soil. Approximately 4,400 cubic yards of cut material from the existing berm, hill, and a portion of the Reservoir 2 berm will be removed, from which approximately 1,250 cubic yards will be used as fill material to meet the proposed grade. These quantities are in addition to the grading work proposed for Reservoir 2. The excess 3,150 cubic yards may be used elsewhere onsite as fill material either for remediation, restoration, or development purposes. No materials will be imported or exported from the site relative to this activity. 2.6.1.4 City Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Tract No. 2981) According to the available title information, the Project Site contains 12 certificate parcels and one parcel created with Parcel Map 03-287. This component of the Project involves subdividing the Project Site into 19 lots: 16 industrial and commercial lots, one lot for recreational facilities, and two open space lots. The proposed lots would range from 4.12 to 178.4 acres in size (see Figure 2-27). Vehicular access would be from Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road, and internal public streets, which would be developed consistent with County and City standards. Four 30-foot wide shared access easements would provide direct access to the industrial lots minimize the number of driveways on Santa Fe Road, Tank Farm Road, and the internal streets. Pedestrian access would be via public sidewalks and recreational trails. 2.6.1.5 Annexation The entire Project Site currently lies outside of the city limits but within the boundary of the City’s Sphere of Influence. The Applicant is proposing to annex approximately 332 acres to the City. The annexation process involves hearings before the City Planning Commission and the City Council to approve a preliminary annexation map. This annexation request is then forwarded to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) as part of the Applicant’s annexation application. LAFCO will then hold its own public hearings to approve or deny the annexation. The AASP will have to be amended by the City Council in advance of the annexation. With annexation, the City would provide water, recycled water, sewer, and public services such as police and fire to developed areas. According to City staff, the City has recently installed (July 2009) a sewer trunk line along the Project Site’s frontage. The Applicant would be required to extend the water main and utilities to the developable areas. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-85 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-27 City Development Plan - Lot Configuration and Phasing Map 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-86 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.6.1.6 Other City Permits Other City permits could be required for certain uses. Grading for remediation and habitat restoration including Tank Farm and Santa Fe Roads, public sidewalks, trails, and street trees would be permitted in conjunction with approved construction plans. Separate grading permits may be needed for the development phases of the Project. In addition, entitlements would be necessary from the Architectural Review Commission for private improvements on individual lots. 2.6.1.7 Development Agreement The Applicant is requesting the City negotiate and enter into a pre-Annexation/ Development Agreement (DA). The DA would address issues relating to AASP cost incurred by the City for infrastructure, development related fees, and the timeframe of the DA. The Applicant is proposing to have an executed DA prior to or concurrent with annexation of the Project Site to the City. The City will use the mitigations identified in this EIR as input in the development of the DA. The mitigation measures included in the EIR will help the City identify the infrastructure improvement that may be needed for the development project. 2.6.2 County Development Plan 2.6.2.1 General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The County’s Land Use Element currently designates approximately 63 acres of the Project Site as Industrial, approximately 20 acres as Commercial Services, approximately 235 acres as Recreation, and the remaining 14 acres are designated as Agriculture. The Applicant proposes amending the Land Use Element of the County General Plan, including the San Luis Obispo Area Plan, to designate approximately 27 acres to Commercial Services, approximately 26 acres to Industrial, 265 acres for Open Space, and the remaining 14 acres used for streets and right-of- ways. The Project would remove the Industrial designation on 23 acres located in the northwest corner of the Project Site and place it on the east side of the Project Site along Tank Farm and Santa Fe Roads. It would also eliminate the 14 acres of Agriculture zoned land. Development is proposed to be moved from the northwest corner of the Project Site to avoid sensitive habitat. The County’s Land Use Ordinance, Title 22 will also need to be amended to allow the array of uses proposed by the Applicant and to allow parcel sizes smaller than 20 acres. Table 2-18 compares existing and proposed land uses designations under the Applicant’s proposed amendments to the County General Plan. 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-87 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-18 San Luis Obispo County General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Comparison of Existing and Proposed Land Use and Acres Land Use Designation Land Area Existing General Plan Acres % Proposed Acres % Commercial Services 16 5 27 8 Industrial 43 13 26 8 Recreation 247 74 265 80 Agriculture 14 4 0 0 Streets, Right of Waya 12 4 14 4 Total 332 100 332 100 a. Streets, Right-of-Way, etc. equals Total Project-Total Parcels. 2.6.2.2 County Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Tract No. 2988) According to available title information, the Project Site contains 12 parcels with certifications of compliance and two larger parcels created with the recording of Parcel Map 03-287. Tract No. 2988 proposes to subdivide the Project Site into 16 lots consisting of 13 industrial and commercial lots (which includes wastewater facilities), one lot for recreation, and two open space lots. The proposed lots would range in size from 4.12 to 178.4 acres (see Figure 2-28). An application for a Vesting Tentative Tract Map has been submitted by the Applicant for processing as part of the permitting process for this Project. Vesting tentative maps are an alternative form of tentative map for subdivisions authorized under the Subdivision Map Act. California Government Code Section 66498.1, et. seq. Upon approval of a vesting tentative map, the subdivider obtains vested rights, for a limited time, to proceed with the development in substantial compliance with the local ordinances, policies and standards in effect at the time the application for approval of the vesting tentative map is deemed complete. 2.6.2.3 Conditional Use Permit (Grading) A Conditional Use Permit would be needed to allow grading for remediation and habitat restoration, including Santa Fe Road and interior streets as well as grading of building lots. A separate permit would be needed for the subsequent development phases of the Project. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-88 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 2-28 County Development Plan - Lot Configuration and Phasing Map 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-89 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2.6.3 Other Potential Permits The Applicant is seeking ratification of the RAP and authorizations under the Clean Water Act and Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act from the RWQCB. The remediation and restoration efforts would also require permits and authorizations from the USACE, Los Angeles District; CDFW; SLO County Environmental Health Division; SLO County Public Works Department; and the SLOAPCD. Please see Table 2-19 for a listing of the anticipated project approvals and permits required for the Project for state, federal, and local agencies. Table 2-19 Anticipated Federal, State, and Local Permits Agency Permit Regulated Activity Authority Federal Agencies U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Permit Discharge of dredged or fill material into waters/wetlands of the U.S. during construction Section 404 Clean Water Act U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 7 Consultation Endangered Species Act) through consultation with the USACE and Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Permit. Impacts to Federally listed species. 16 USCA 1513 50 CFR Section 17 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act NHPA) Review (through USACE process) (possible) Project activities that will affect register eligible prehistoric or historic resources subject to federal protection requirements. Review by the ACHP would only be needed if the project affects registered eligible prehistoric or historic resources subject to federal protection requirements. Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA) Conditional Letter of Map Revision, Letter of Map Revision Revision to 100-year flood maps for fill placed within 100 year flood zone Executive Order State Agencies California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Compliance with CA Endangered Species Act Species disturbance through remediation process. Sections 1601-1607 of the Fish and Game CodeStreamAlteration Agreement (1602) Alteration of the natural state of any stream. Approval of RAP Enforcement of Oil Pollution Act Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Approval of RAP Remedial Action Plan activities California Water Code Section 401 Water Quality Certification Discharge of fill that may affect surface and groundwater quality. California Water Code Clean Water Act Authorization under NPDES Waste Discharge Permit s possible) Discharge of treated groundwater or surface water generated during construction and operation under the County Development Plan (if needed) Clean Water Act Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act Authorization under NPDES Storm Water Construction General Permit Construction activities that disturb more than 1 acre. Clean Water Act California Water Code State Office of Historic Preservation State Level Review of Section 106 Compliance Project activities that will affect register eligible prehistoric or Review by the SOHP would only be needed 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-90 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-19 Anticipated Federal, State, and Local Permits Agency Permit Regulated Activity Authority possible) historic resources subject to federal protection requirements. in the project affects registered eligible prehistoric or historic resources subject to federal protection requirements. CALFIRE Blasting Permit, Building Permits Use of explosives, Fire protection systems in buildings California Fire Code Local Agencies SLO County Planning and Building Department General Plan and Land Use Ordinance Amendment, Tentative Tract Map Conditional Use Permit, Grading Permits, Demolition Permits, Blasting Permit, Temporary Building Permits, Building Permits Land use, grading, drainage, and environmental impacts Title 22 County Code CEQA SLO County Public Works Department Encroachment Permit Any work within public right-of- ways (if needed). County Code SLO County Environmental Health Division Well Construction/ Destruction Permits, CUPA Approval and inspection of monitoring well and water supply well destruction. Approval and inspection of new monitoring well construction. Review and enforcement of hazardous materials management plans. Title 22 County Code California Water Code SLO County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD) Authority to Construct/ Permit to Operate, NESHAP Emissions associated with construction and operations may require permits.a Demolition will require a NESHAP notification. Clean Air Act SLO Airport Land Use Commission ALUC) Consistency review, AASP Approval, ACOS Plan Approval Development within the Airport Land Use Plan area. Airport Land Use Plan City of San Luis Obispo EIR Certification General Plan/Specific Plan Amendment, Annexation approval, Tentative Tract Map, Grading Permits, Blasting Permit, Building Permits, Demolition Permits, Encroachment Permits Annexation of areas to be developed into City Approval of tentative tract map. Grading, demolition and construction of improvements in City jurisdiction. City Code Subdivision Map Act Acceptance of offer to dedicate road right-of-way New roadways and roadway improvements associated with new development City Code Local Agency Formation Annexation approval Annexation of re-development areas into City. Cortese-Knox- Hertzberg Act of 2.0 Project Description December 2013 2-91 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 2-19 Anticipated Federal, State, and Local Permits Agency Permit Regulated Activity Authority Commission LAFCO) 2000, LAFCO policies Santa Barbara County Haul Permit Hauling of contaminated soil over Santa Barbara County Roads to the Santa Maria Landfill. Santa Barbara Public Works requirement. a. Chevron maintains a Permit to Operate (PTO) with the SLOAPCD for the de-gassing and pipeline decommissioning activities in the County (Reference PTO No. 735). 2.7 References The Airport Land Use Commission for San Luis Obispo County. 2005. Airport Land Use Plan for the San Luis Obispo Regional Airport. San Luis Obispo, CA: The Airport Land Use Commission for San Luis Obispo County; May 18, 2005. Associated Transportation Engineers (ATE). 2007. Chevron San Luis Obispo Traffic and Circulation Study. November 9, 2007. AVOCET. 2007. Remedial Action Plan. December 18, 2007. 2007. Feasibility Study, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. March 15, 2007. BBL. 2005. Risk Management Summary. December 12, 2005. Chevron. 2005. Presentation on Project as Part of Application. 2007. Final Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Re-development Project. San Luis Obispo, CA: December 20, 2007. 2008. Restoration and Redevelopment Project Application. 2012. Letter to Mr. Bill Henry. San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Redevelopment Project: Request to Add Modification to Proposed Project Description to Address Elevated Arsenic Concentrations in Surface Soil at Two Locations. December 21, 2012. 2012. Letter to Mr. Bill Henry. San Luis Tank Farm Remediation Project: Request to Add Reservoir 2 to the Project Description. July 27, 2011. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 1996. Guidance for Ecological Risk Assessment at Hazardous Waste Sites and Permitted Facilities Part A: Overview. Draft. Sacramento, CA: Office of Scientific Affairs, California EPA; 1996. England Geosystem, Inc. 2001. Supplemental Site Characterization. October 15, 2001. 2.0 Project Description Chevron Tank Farm 2-92 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR England, Shahin & Associates. 1994. Supplemental Ground Water Investigation Unocal Tank Farm Facility. May 11, 1994. McDaniel Lambert, Inc. 2004. Human Health Risk Assessment for the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Version 2.0. San Luis Obispo, CA. May 25, 2004. Padre. 2007. Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Re-Development Project. San Luis Obispo, CA: December 20, 2007. Padre [letter]. July 17, 2009. Chevron. Information Request. 2009. Landscape and Restoration for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm: 75% Basis of Design Report. Remediation Technology Panel (RTP). 2006. Assessment of Off-Site Migration and On-Site Surface Expressions of Hydrocarbons at the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site. May 9 , 2006. WSP Environment & Energy, Padre. 2008. An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. August. 5, 2008. 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology December 2013 3-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology Under the CEQA Guidelines, “a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental impact report (EIR) together with other projects causing related impacts.” Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an environmental impact report (EIR) discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in section 15065(c). An EIR need not discuss impacts that do not result in part from the project evaluated in that EIR. The cumulative discussion does not need to provide as much detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone. The discussion of cumulative impacts shall be guided by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and shall focus on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute rather than the attributes of other projects which do not contribute to the cumulative impact.”(CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)). The CEQA Guidelines allow for two approaches or methodologies, for establishing the cumulative scenario. One approach is to use a “list of cumulative projects producing related or cumulative impacts.” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)(1)(A)). The other is to use a summary of projects contained in an adopted general plan or related planning document, or in a prior environmental document which has been adopted or certified, which described or evaluated regional or area wide conditions contributing to the cumulative impact.” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)(1)(B)). This EIR uses a combination of the two approaches that includes (Tier I) specific projects that are reasonably foreseeable, and (Tier II) Area Plans and General Plan updates that are currently undergoing review. Tier I projects are specific cumulative projects within the study area that are reasonably foreseeable. Tier II projects are Area Plans and General Plan items that are currently undergoing review by the City and County. The combined Tier I and Tier II approach was used because for some of the issue areas there was a need to assess not only other specific projects but also actions resulting from the implementation of Area Plans and General Plan updates. Certain issues, such as traffic and air quality, are more regional in nature, and cumulative impacts need to be assessed based upon regional information contained in various City and County Plans as well as the specific projects. For example, the analysis of cumulative impacts in traffic and circulation need to considers build out conditions in the City of San Luis Obispo, as well as regional transportation improvements. Cumulative water quality impacts are considered on a watershed basis for the San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed, and include area wide projects covered in both the Tier I and Tier II projects. For issue areas such as noise and biology, where the cumulative impacts are more localized (i.e., to the Project Site only), the Tier I projects are included in the cumulative analysis. 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology Chevron Tank Farm 3-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 3.1 Cumulative Development Scenario The proposed Project Site is in unincorporated San Luis Obispo County (County), California, just south of the City of San Luis Obispo (City). Although predominantly vacant, the 332-acre site has remnants of its previous use as a petroleum storage and distribution facility, including three buildings, utility lines, a paved parking lot, fencing, and reservoir imprints (see Figure 2-2). Cattle also graze on site for weed control and fire prevention. The proposed Project Site is surrounded by the rural and urban development of the City and County of San Luis Obispo. The northern side of the proposed Project Site is bound by undeveloped land used for grazing. The northwestern side of the site abuts 32 acres of level, tilled cropland (north of Tank Farm Road). Actively tilled cropland and hay-cropped land abuts the southern side of the Project Site (near Esperanza Lane) and land used for livestock grazing also abuts its southern side. The San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport is southeast of the site, with runways oriented northwest to southeast. Areas containing developed industrial/business parks with light manufacturing, commercial office, and service uses lie to the northwest of the site (south of Meissner Lane), to the west of the site along Suburban Road (and south of Tank Farm Road), and to the southeast of the Project Site. Parkland is located northeast of the site and a mobile home park is situated east of the site north of Tank Farm Road). The closest residential uses are the mobile home park referenced above and scattered residences within agricultural lands. U.S. Highway 101 lies less than one mile to the west of the proposed Project Site, while State Route 227 (Broad Street) is less than one mile to the east of the proposed Project Site. California Polytechnic State University, Camp San Luis Obispo (California National Guard), and Cuesta College are to the north and northwest of the proposed Project Site. 3.1.1 Proposed Development in the City and County of San Luis Obispo The Tier I reasonably foreseeable projects in the City and County that could contribute to the cumulative effects scenario are listed in Table 3-1 and shown in Figure 3-1. Collectively, these projects represent known and anticipated activities that may occur in the Project vicinity that have the potential to contribute to a cumulative impact on the environment. Many of the Tier I projects in the cumulative effects scenario are limited in their geographic extent and would only result in minor construction plans and renovations. Other Tier I projects are expansive in nature and would have the potential to create cumulative impacts. The Tier I cumulative projects related to the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA) are listed as County projects in Table 3-1. The Tier II Area Plan and General Plan update projects are included in Table 3-2. These tables provide the project name and project type, as well as its location and status. 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology December 2013 3-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 3-1 List of Tier I Cumulative Projects (Specific Projects) Project Location Type Description Status City of San Luis Obispo 1 Broad Street Village 2238 Broad Street Residential Commercial Residential and Commercial 83 residential units and 30,000 sq. ft. commercial space 2 DeBlauw Map 408 Prado Road Residential Commercial Residential and Business Park 121single-family residential lots, one lot for affordable housing (23 units); and 6 mixed-use lots 3 Cowan Map 392 Prado Road Residential Commercial Residential and Business Park 56 single-family residential lots, 10 mixed-use lots 4 King Map 3000 Calle Malva Residential 165 Single Family lots, 32 multi-family lots Tentative Map approved 5 Airport Business Park 4450 Broad Street Commercial 70,000 sq. ft in seven buildings for office and retail use One Gymnasium building constructed. Other buildings pending building permits not yet submitted. 6 Suburban Road Tract Map 143, 151 & 163 Suburban Road Commercial 23 commercial lots on two existing parcels one vacant and one developed) totaling approximately 13.5 acres on the south side of Suburban Road between Short Street and Horizon Lane. Parcels range in size from 9,000 square feet to 202,113 square feet Tentative Map approved 7 Long Bonetti Ranch Commercial Development 3897 S. Higuera Street 120 Tank Farm Road Commercial Several commercial buildings with a total of 43,000 square feet Approved. Pending submittal of building permits 8 Moylan Terrace 851 & 860 Humbert Avenue Residential 81 residential units Under construction 9 Broad Street Mixed Use Project 3229 Broad Street Residential Commercial Mixed use project with 4,000 square feet of commercial space and eight residential units Pending building permit review 10 2959 Broad Street 2959 Broad Street Commercial Automatic Carwash Building permits submitted and pending final approval 11 Laurel Creek 861 & 953 Orcutt Sacramento at Orcutt) Residential 161 residential units 44 units completed; 117 pending. 12 Creekston 791 Orcutt Residential Commercial Mixed-use project with 86 residential units and 10,000 square feet of commercial floor area Planning approvals complete, building permits not submitted 13 Johnson Avenue Housing Project 1642 Johnson Avenue)) Residential 88 residential units EIR under review 14 Mind Body Development 651 Tank Farm Road Business Park Develop approximately 60,000 square feet two story office building with outdoor plaza, surface parking and a four-level parking structure Under Review 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology Chevron Tank Farm 3-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 3-1 List of Tier I Cumulative Projects (Specific Projects) Project Location Type Description Status County of San Luis Obispo 15 Green Waste Management Facility Orcutt Road Industrial Composting facility Information hold pending review 16 Fiber Optic Cable Rail Road Right-of- Way Industrial Install fiber optic cable along 242 miles between San Luis Obispo and Los Angeles in the Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-way Application Received 17 Wind/Solar Energy System 4910 Edna Road Industrial 500 KVA photovoltaic system - ground mounted - for courtside cellars winery Project Approved 18 Dalidio Ranch 1035 Madonna Road Industrial Storage site for fill material intended for a future multi-use development on 131 acres Application Received 19 Home Depot Area - Grading 12393 Los Osos Valley Road Industrial Engineered (major) grading for drainage facility for home depot area Permits Issued 20 Grading Project 1900 Southwood Drive Industrial Grading restoration - as-built grading: remove and restore grading and remove 3 water tanks Project Approved 21 Industrial Buildings Buckley Road Industrial Two industrial buildings totaling 25,500 square feet Information hold pending review 22 Grading Major Project 470 Buckley Road Industrial Placement of top soil from Costco site to agricultural land (Drake Farms) for agricultural use Project Approved 23 Airport Project 4733 Broad Street 22,583 square foot private air terminal; 33,400 square foot repair hangar; 27,000 square foot repair hangar; curb, gutter and sidewalk waiver Under Review 24 Grading Major Project 1146 Farmhouse Lane Industrial Major grading for three pads for future industrial structures, rough grading and utilities, parking lot, concrete flatwork and landscape under building permit Under Review 25 Commercial Development Broad Street Commercial Two 10,000 square foot buildings, parking and landscaping. Project Approved 26 Road Improvements Los Osos Valley Road overpass at Hwy 101 n/a Widen overpass to 4 lanes at Hwy 101 Project Approved Source: City 2011a, 2011b, County 2011 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology December 2013 3-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 3-1 Location of Tier I Cumulative Projects 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology Chevron Tank Farm 3-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 3-2 List of Tier II Cumulative Projects (Area and General Plans) Project Location Type Description Status 1 Area Plan Broad Street Service- Commercial Broad Street Corridor Plan (includes land use and zoning amendments, design and circulation standards) Under review 2 City-wide General Plan and Circulation Element Updates City-wide n/a City-wide update to General Plan LUE and Circulation Element. Under review 3 Area Plan Avila Ranch 173 Buckley Road Business Park to be rezoned 550 housing units, 15-20,000 sq. ft commercial and office. Buckley Road extension to S. Higuera. Conceptual Review over the next year. 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology December 2013 3-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 3.1.2 Caltrans The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) currently has one cumulative project that is of a scale and location that could contribute to cumulative impacts. Caltrans proposes to improve the Los Osos Valley Road/US Highway 101 interchange in the City and County in order to correct operational deficiencies and improve safety. The Los Osos Valley Road/US Highway 101 Interchange Improvements Project would widen both the Los Osos Valley Road overcrossing and the adjacent San Luis Obispo Creek bridge (Caltrans 2009). As a result of its initial study, Caltrans determined that the proposed improvements to the Los Osos Valley Road/US Highway 101 interchange would not have a significant effect on the environment. Further, due to the proposed mitigation measures, the proposed improvement of the Los Osos Valley Road/US Highway 101 interchange would reduce the potential effects on aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, and transportation/traffic to insignificant (Caltrans 2009). With the environmental review portion of the process completed, design and construction of all or part of the proposed improvements to the Los Osos Valley Road/US Highway 101 interchange is contingent on funding approval. 3.1.3 Other Potential Stakeholders The Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County, California Polytechnic State University, Camp San Luis Obispo (California National Guard), Cuesta College, and Pacific Gas & Electric Company do not currently have any active or proposed cumulative projects in the cumulative impact study area. 3.2 Cumulative Impact Analysis Methodology The development of the Tank Farm Property was included as part of the City of San Luis Obispo’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP), and the cumulative impacts of development of this area were addressed as part of the Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related Facilities Master Plans Program EIR. While the Project would result in a number of changes to the AASP, these changes are mainly structural in nature (elimination of a road, changes in location and mix of development on the Project Site), and would not substantially affect the cumulative analysis contained within the AASP EIR. The cumulative analysis in the Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related Facilities Master Plans Program EIR is incorporated by reference in this EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(d)). However, changes have occurred since the Final Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related Facilities Master Plans Program EIR that required an update to the cumulative analysis as part of this EIR. Also, the Final Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related Facilities Master Plans Program EIR did not address the remediation of the Project Site, which is part of the proposed Project. 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology Chevron Tank Farm 3-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The area within which a cumulative effect can occur varies by issue area. For example, air quality impacts tend to disperse over a large area, while noise and safety impacts are typically more localized. For this reason, the geographic scope for the analysis of cumulative impacts must be identified for each issue area. The analysis of cumulative effects considers a number of variables including geographic (spatial) limits, time (temporal) limits, and the characteristics of the resource being evaluated. The geographic scope of each analysis is based on the topography surrounding the Project Site, and the natural boundaries of the resource affected, rather than jurisdictional boundaries. The geographic scope of cumulative effects will often extend beyond the scope of the direct effects, but not beyond the scope of the direct and indirect effects of the Project. In addition, each of the cumulative projects has its own implementation schedule, which may or may not coincide or overlap with the proposed Project’s schedule. This is a consideration for short term impacts from the Project. The cumulative impact analysis for each individual issue area is included in the respective discussions in Sections 4.1 through 4.15 of this EIR. 3.3 References California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2009. Los Osos Valley Road/US 101 Interchange Improvements Project. Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration. December 2009. SCH No. 2008061098. San Luis Obispo County (County). 2011. Department of Planning and Building, Environmental Resource Division. May 24, 2011. List of County Cumulative Airport Area Projects. City of San Luis Obispo (City). 2011a. Community Development Department. May 12, 2011. Cumulative Development Summary. 2011b. Community Development Department. Quarterly Project Status Report, October - December 2009. http://www.ci.san-luis- obispo.ca.us/communitydevelopment/download/October-December2009QtrRpt.pdf. Accessed on June 17, 2011. 2003. Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related Facilities Master Plans. September 2003. SCH #2000051062. 4.0 Environmental Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 4-1 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.0 Environmental Analysis This chapter examines the potential environmental impacts of the Project. Each issue area analyzed in this chapter provides background information and describes the environmental setting (baseline conditions) to help the reader understand the underlying conditions against which an impact is evaluated. In addition, each section describes how an impact on those underlying conditions is determined “significant” or “less than significant.” Finally, the individual sections recommend mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts. Throughout this chapter, impacts are identified with a letter-number designation (e.g., impact BIO.1, impact AE.3). Corresponding mitigation measures are connected numerically to their impacts (e.g., BIO-1a and AE-3a). This environmental impact report (EIR) includes many references that have been abbreviated to acronyms. A list of acronyms is included following the Table of Contents, as well as in Appendix L. Assessment Methodology The analysis of each issue area begins with an examination of the existing physical setting baseline conditions as determined pursuant to Section 15125(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines) that may be affected by the Project. The effects of the Project are defined as changes to the environmental setting attributable to Project components or operation. Significance criteria are identified for each environmental issue area. The significance criteria serve as benchmarks for determining if a component action will result in a significant adverse environmental impact when evaluated against the baseline. According to Section 15382 of the CEQA Guidelines, a significant effect on the environment means “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project.” Proposed Project Impact Analysis Based upon the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and scoping comments, 15 issue/resource areas were identified where potentially significant impacts could occur from the Project. The impact analysis for each of these issue areas is provided in the following subsections of Chapter 4. The analysis of each issue area has defined the study area for purposes of the impact analysis. In most cases, the study area is the region that is in the vicinity of the Project. For each identified impact, the following framework was used: Impact Discussion; Mitigation Measures; and Residual Impacts The residual impact is the impact classification after any mitigation has been applied. If an impact is found to be less than significant then the residual impact would remain less than 4.0 Environmental Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 4-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR significant with or without mitigation. All residual impacts identified in this document have been classified according to the following criteria: Class I - Significant and Unmitigable: Significant adverse impacts that cannot be effectively mitigated. No measures can be taken to avoid or reduce these adverse effects to insignificant or negligible levels. Class II – Less Than Significant with Mitigation: These impacts are potentially similar in significance to those of Class I impacts, but can be eliminated or reduced below an issue area’s significance criteria threshold by the implementation of mitigation measures. Class III – Less Than Significant: An adverse impact that does not meet or exceed an issue’s significance criteria threshold. Generally, no mitigation measures are required for such impacts, although they may still be recommended should the lead or responsible agency deem it appropriate to reduce the impact to the maximum extent feasible. Class IV - Beneficial: Effects are beneficial to the environment. If the impact remains at or above the pertinent significance criteria after mitigation is applied, it is deemed to be significant and unavoidable, Class I. If a “significant impact” is reduced, based on compliance with mitigation, to a level below the pertinent significance criteria, it is determined to no longer have a significant effect on the environment (i.e., to be less than significant with mitigation, Class II). If an action creates an adverse impact above the baseline condition, but such impact does not meet or exceed the pertinent significance criteria, it is determined to be less than significant, Class III. An action that provides an improvement to an environmental issue area in comparison to the baseline information is recognized as a beneficial impact, Class IV. Formulation of Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring Program When significant impacts are identified, feasible mitigation measures are formulated to eliminate or reduce the severity of the impacts and focus on the protection of sensitive resources. The effectiveness of a mitigation measure is subsequently determined by evaluating the impact remaining after its application. The impacts remaining after mitigation are considered residual impacts. The residual impacts can be either significant or less than significant. Implementation of more than one mitigation measure may be needed to reduce an impact below a level of significance. The mitigation measures recommended in this document are identified in the impact sections and presented in a Mitigation Monitoring Plan, provided as Appendix K to the EIR . Measures that have been incorporated as part of an Applicant’s Project design are considered design features and are not considered as mitigation measures under CEQA. If they eliminate or reduce a potentially significant impact to a level below the significance criteria, they eliminate the potential for that significant impact since the “measure” is a component of the action. However, if the Project is approved, the Applicant-proposed measures would be part of the conditions of approval. Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 establishes two distinct requirements for agencies involved in the CEQA process. Subdivisions (a) and (b) of the section relate to mitigation monitoring and reporting, and the obligation to mitigate significant effects where possible. 4.0 Environmental Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 4-3 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Pursuant to subdivision (a), whenever a public agency completes an EIR and makes a finding pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code taking responsibility for mitigation identified in the EIR, the agency must adopt a program of monitoring or reporting which will ensure that mitigation measures are complied with during implementation of an approved project. The City of San Luis Obispo (City) and San Luis Obispo County (County) will be responsible for monitoring of the mitigation measures adopted pursuant to this EIR. One important step in monitoring is defining the responsibility of the Applicant to support this process. Mitigation Measure EM-1 defines this process, and is required to support all other mitigation measures and Applicant-proposed measures defined in this EIR. EM-1 Prior to issuance of construction permits, the Applicant shall enter into agreements with the City and County to provide funding for an environmental monitor to ensure compliance with each Agency’s environmental Conditions of Approval and EIR mitigation measures. The monitor shall assist the Agencies in condition compliance and mitigation monitoring for all applicable construction and operational stages of the Project, as specified in a scope of work, as approved by the Agencies. The monitoring plan shall include a post construction program to monitor measures that extend beyond the construction period (e.g., success of revegetation and landscaping, etc.), as well as monitor certain mitigation measures required during the operational phase. The monitor will prepare a working monitoring plan that reflects the Agencies approved environmental mitigation measures/conditions of approval. This plan will include: 1. goals, responsibilities, authorities, and procedures for verifying compliance with environmental mitigations; 2. lines of communication and reporting methods; 3. daily and weekly reporting of compliance; 4. construction crew training regarding environmental sensitivities; 5. authority to stop work; and 6. action to be taken in the event of non compliance. The environmental monitor shall be under contract to the Agencies. Costs of the monitor, and any Agency administrative fees, shall be paid by the Applicant. The Applicant shall also be responsible for funding work required by mitigation measures requiring use of individuals with special expertise (e.g., botanist, wildlife biologist). The Agencies’ environmental monitor will coordinate the monitoring efforts of the specialist, including communication with the Agencies, reporting and availability (at appropriate times: prior to issuance of construction permits, or during construction, as required by individual mitigation measures presented in Sections 4.1 through 4.15). 4.0 Environmental Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 4-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Cumulative Projects Impact Analysis Each issue area in this chapter includes a cumulative impact analysis, which identifies the potential impacts of the Project that might not be significant when considered alone, but that might contribute to a significant impact in conjunction with the other cumulative projects. The list and description of cumulative projects is included in Chapter 3.0, Cumulative Projects. CEQA Issues Associated with Remediation Projects Analyses included in an EIR typically focus on impacts associated with the construction and operation of new development projects, or on regional development plans that evaluate future growth impacts in a municipality. Since a remedial project is very different from a typical development project, the need to prepare an EIR raises some difficult questions about how the analysis should be conducted with regard to the evaluation of impacts (e.g., treatment of existing site contamination). EIR preparation for remedial projects is complicated by the fact that impacts to the environment have already occurred. However, under the strictest interpretation of CEQA, the potential impacts to be evaluated in the EIR should only include impacts associated with the construction and operation of the remediation and development project itself. Thus, two types of impacts do not fall under the strictly interpreted scope of CEQA, (1) any impacts that have already occurred from the contamination; and (2) impacts associated with the remaining contamination after remediation that would not affect the proposed development. Therefore, impacts that have already occurred at the Project Site as a result of previous site contamination have not been evaluated in this EIR. The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15125 states: An EIR must include a description of the environment in the vicinity of the project, as it exists before the commencement of the project from both a local and regional perspective.” Since the contamination at the Project Site is pre-existing, it has been included in the environmental baseline. The evaluation of impacts and damages which have occurred as a result of the contamination are handled by other regulatory processes rather than an EIR. The EIR has addressed the potential impacts of the remaining contamination after remediation on the proposed development for both the City and County Development Plans, since the proposed development is an addition to the existing baseline. However, the EIR does not address the potential effect of the remaining contamination on areas of the Project Site where no development is proposed since this would remain the same or less than the baseline conditions. Finally, it is not the role of this EIR to establish cleanup levels for the Project Site. Ultimately, it will be the responsibility of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and other resource agencies such as California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to establish cleanup levels for the Project Site, based upon the type of approved development, and the protection of ecological resources. Cleanup levels will be established as part of their approval process for the Remedial Action Plan (RAP). A copy of the RAP is provided in Appendix A.1. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases This section considers operational and construction-related emissions and odors that could result from the proposed Project. Emission rates were generated using standard emission factors and the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) modeling program, as applicable. CalEEMod data sheets and other emission calculations are included in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Appendix (Appendix B). Appendix B also provides an introductory section on the calculation methodologies and inputs to the calculations. Emissions were estimated using spreadsheets for the remediation phase and using the CalEEMod model for the development phase. The Project would include a variety of activities, including remediation, construction, and operations, some of which would occur daily and others which would occur sporadically. This analysis attempts to provide a reasonable worst-case scenario of potential air emissions resulting from remediation, construction, and daily operations and recommends mitigation to reduce those impacts to a less than significant level. 4.1.1 Environmental Setting San Luis Obispo County (County) is part of the South Central Coast Air Basin, which also includes Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties. The climate of the San Luis Obispo area is strongly influenced by its proximity to the Pacific Ocean. Airflow around the County plays an important role in the movement and dispersion of pollutants. The speed and direction of local winds are controlled by the location and strength of the Pacific high-pressure system and other global weather patterns, topographical factors, and circulation patterns that result from temperature differences between the land and the sea. The County constitutes a land area of approximately 3,316 square miles with varied vegetation, topography, and climate. From a geographical and meteorological standpoint, the County can be divided into three general regions: the Coastal Plateau, the Upper Salinas River Valley, and the East County Plain. Air quality in each of these regions is characteristically different, although the physical features that divide them provide only limited barriers to the transport of pollutants between regions. Approximately 75 percent of the County’s population, and a corresponding portion of the commercial and industrial facilities, are located within the Coastal Plateau. Due to higher population density and closer spacing of urban areas, emissions of air pollutants per unit area are generally higher in this region than in other regions of the County. The Project is located within the Coastal Plateau. 4.1.1.1 Air Quality Monitoring The County’s air quality is measured by ten air quality-monitoring stations. The San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD) operates six permanent stations at Nipomo Regional 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Park, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Atascadero, Red Hills (near Shandon in eastern San Luis Obispo County), and Carrizo Plain. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) operates two additional stations in the cities of San Luis Obispo (City) and Paso Robles. One station on the Nipomo Mesa was operated by the District for the ConocoPhillips refinery in 2007. A tenth station was operated at Hillview (near Highway 1 and Willow Road), Nipomo Mesa (San Luis Obispo APCD 2008). This station specialized in the monitoring of inhalable particulate matter less than 10 microns in size (PM10). Air quality monitoring is rigorously controlled by federal and state quality assurance and control procedures to ensure data validity. Gaseous pollutant levels are measured continuously and averaged each hour, 24 hours per day. Particulate pollutants are generally sampled by filter techniques over averaging periods of 3 to 24 hours. PM10 and inhalable particulate matter that is 2.5 microns or less in size (PM2.5) are sampled for 24 hours every sixth day on the same schedule nationwide. Table 4.1-1 outlines the federal and state standards for ambient air quality. Specific air pollutants monitored are discussed below. Carbon Monoxide (CO): CO is a colorless and odorless gas formed by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. CO competes with oxygen, often replacing it in the blood, thus reducing the blood's ability to transport oxygen to vital organs in the body. The ambient air quality standard for CO is intended to protect people whose medical condition already compromises their circulatory system's ability to deliver oxygen. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2): NO2 is a brownish gas formed in the atmosphere through a rapid reaction of the colorless gas nitric oxide (NO) with atmospheric oxygen. NO and NO2 are collectively referred to as nitrogen oxides (NOx). NO2 can cause respiratory irritation and constriction of the airways, making breathing more difficult. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2): SO2 is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels. Health effects include acute respiratory symptoms and breathing difficulty. In 2006, seven locations monitored SO2 levels and neither the state nor the federal standards were exceeded. Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10). PM10 is the coarse fraction of suspended particulate matter measuring 10 microns or less in diameter, and includes a complex mixture of man-made and natural substances including sulfates, nitrates, metals, elemental carbon, sea salt, soil, organics, and other materials. PM10 may have adverse health impacts because these microscopic particles can penetrate the respiratory system. In some cases, the particulates themselves may cause actual damage to the alveoli of the lungs or they may contain adsorbed substances that are injurious. Ambient PM10 concentrations have been primarily a localized issue of concern in the southern portion of the County, including the City, Paso Robles, Morro Bay, and Nipomo. Exceedances in these areas are the major impetus for the County’s nonattainment designation for the state PM10 standard. The major sources for PM10 are mineral quarries, grading, demolition, agricultural tilling, road dust, and vehicle exhaust. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.1-1 State and National Criteria Air Pollutant Standards, Effects, and Sources Air Pollutant State Standard concentration/ averaging time) Federal Primary Standard concentration/ averaging time) Most Relevant Effects Ozone 0.09 ppm, 1-hour average 0.070 ppm, 8-hour 0.075 ppm, 8-hour average* a) Short-term exposures: (1) Pulmonary function decrements and localized lung edema in humans and animals and (2) Risk to public health implied by alterations in pulmonary morphology and host defense in animals; (b) Long-term exposures: Risk to public health implied by altered connective tissue metabolism and altered pulmonary morphology in animals after long-term exposures and pulmonary function decrements in chronically exposed humans; (c) Vegetation damage; and (d) Property damage. Carbon Monoxide 9.0 ppm, 8-hour average 20 ppm, 1-hour average 9 ppm, 8-hour average 35 ppm, 1-hour average a) Aggravation of angina pectoris and other aspects of coronary heart disease; (b) Decreased exercise tolerance in persons with peripheral vascular disease and lung disease; (c) Impairment of central nervous system functions; and (d) Possible increased risk to fetuses. Nitrogen Dioxide 0.18 ppm, 1-hour average, 0.03 ppm, annual average 0.053 ppm 0.10 ppm 98th percentile, 3-year average a) Potential to aggravate chronic respiratory disease and respiratory symptoms in sensitive groups; (b) Risk to public health implied by pulmonary and extra-pulmonary biochemical and cellular changes and pulmonary structural changes; and (c) Contribution to atmospheric discoloration. Sulfur Dioxide 0.04 ppm, 24-hour average 0.25 ppm, 1-hour average 0.075 ppm, 1-hour, 99th percentile 3-year average Bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms which may include wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness, during exercise or physical activity in persons with asthma. Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) 20 µg/m3, annual arithmetic mean 50 µg/m3, 24-hour average 150 µg/m3, 24-hour average a) Excess deaths from short-term exposures and exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with respiratory disease and (b) Excess seasonal declines in pulmonary function, especially in children. Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) 12 µg/m3, annual arithmetic mean 15 µg/m3, annual arithmetic mean 35 µg/m3, 24-hour average Decreased lung function from exposures and exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with respiratory disease, elderly, and children. Sulfates 25 µg/m3, 24-hour average No federal standard a) Decrease in ventilatory function; (b) Aggravation of asthmatic symptoms; (c) Aggravation of cardio-pulmonary disease; (d) Vegetation damage; (e) Degradation of visibility; and (f) Property damage due to corrosion. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.1-1 State and National Criteria Air Pollutant Standards, Effects, and Sources Air Pollutant State Standard concentration/ averaging time) Federal Primary Standard concentration/ averaging time) Most Relevant Effects Lead 1.5 µg/m3, 30-day average 0.15 µg/m3, roll 3-month average 1.5 µg/m3, calendar quarter a) Increased body burden and (b) Impairment of blood formation and nerve conduction. Visibility- Reducing Particles In sufficient amount to give an extinction coefficient of 0.23 per kilometers (visual range of 10 miles or more) with relative humidity less than 70%, 8-hour average 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. PST) No federal standard Reduction of visibility, aesthetic impact and impacts due to particulates see above). Hydrogen Sulfide 0.03 ppm, 1-hour average No federal standard Odor annoyance. Vinyl Chloride 0.01 ppm, 24-hour average No federal standard Known carcinogen. Note: µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter. * Effective May 27, 2008. Was 0.08 ppm prior Source: SLOAPCD web site 2012 http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The PM2.5 standard is a subset of the PM10 standard. In addition to the health effects of PM10, exposure to PM2.5 may result in increased respiratory symptoms, disease, and decreased lung function. In addition to primary criteria pollutants, the SLOAPCD monitors ozone at various locations throughout the region. Unlike primary criteria pollutants emitted directly from an emissions source, ozone is a secondary pollutant. Ozone is formed in the atmosphere through the photochemical reaction of volatile organic compounds (VOC), NOx, oxygen, and other hydrocarbon materials with sunlight. Ozone is a deep lung irritant, causing the passages to become inflamed and swollen. Exposure to ozone produces alterations in respiration; the most characteristic of which are shallow, rapid breathing and a decrease in pulmonary performance. Ozone also reduces the respiratory system's ability to fight infection and remove foreign particles. Ozone exists both at ground level, where it is considered a pollutant with harmful effects, and at higher elevations in the lower portion of the stratosphere from approximately 13 to 40 km above Earth, where, providing a beneficial effect, it absorbs more than 95 percent of the Sun’s ultraviolet light. Ground-level ambient ozone is primarily generated by combustion byproducts reacting with sunlight and ambient conditions. Areas where ozone violations primarily occur are the northern and eastern portions of the County, where summer temperatures are high. Ozone levels exceeding the state standard have been measured in Paso Robles, the Carrizo Plain, and Atascadero in recent years. In addition, ozone is transported into the County from upwind regions of the state. In the County, ozone and PM10 are the pollutants of main concern, since concentrations exceeding state health-based standards occur here. For this reason, the County has been designated as a non-attainment area for the state PM10 and ozone standards. Table 4.1-2 shows the last three years of monitoring data for ozone and PM for the Higuera Street monitoring station, located about 0.5 miles northwest of the Project Site. Note that the ozone standards were exceeded for one to two days in 2008 and there were no exceedances in 2007 and 2006. PM standards were exceeded in 2006, with no exceedances in 2007 and 2008. Table 4.1-3 shows the attainment status of criteria pollutants in the Air Basin. Meteorological data from the Higuera Street station was obtained from the CARB for the year 2008 and plotted into a wind rose to demonstrate the predominant wind direction and speeds at the Project Site. Figure 4.1-1 shows the resulting wind rose. The predominant wind direction is from the northwest. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.1-2 Monitoring Results at the Higuera Street Monitoring Station Pollutant Standard 2006 2007 2008 Ozone Max 1-hr concentration (ppm) 0.070 0.071 0.109 No. days exceeded: State > 0.09 ppm/1-hr 0 0 1 Max 8-hr concentration (ppm) 0.060 0.064 0.076 No. days exceeded: State > 0.07 ppm/8-hr 0 0 2 No. days exceeded: Federal > 0.075 ppm/8-hr 0 0 1 Particulates (PM10) Max 24-hr concentration (g/m3) 72 32 42.2 No. days exceeded: State > 50 g/m3/24-hr 5.8 0 0 No. days exceeded: Federal > 150 g/m3/24-hr 0 0 0 Particulates (PM2.5) Max 24-hr concentration (g/m3) 24.2 19.2 18.4 No. days exceeded: Federal > 35 g/m3/24-hr 0 0 - Notes: The Higuera Station only monitors ozone and PM Source: CARB website Air Quality Data Table 4.1-3 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Central Coast Air Basin Pollutant State Federal O3 - 1 hour Nonattainment Standard Revoked June 2005 O3 - 8 hour Nonattainment Nonattainment Eastern SLO Attainment Western SLO PM10 Nonattainment Attainment/Unclassified PM2.5 Attainment Attainment/Unclassified CO Attainment Unclassified NO2 Attainment Unclassified SO2 Attainment Unclassified Lead Attainment No Attainment Information All others Attainment/Unclassified No standards Source: SLOAPCD website 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.1-1 Higuera Street Meteorological Station Wind Rose - 2008 Note: Wind rose shows the direction that the wind is coming from. Source: CARB meteorological data, 2008 4.1.1.2 Countywide Emissions Inventory This section provides a summary of the countywide emission inventory. Criteria Pollutants On a regional basis, ozone is the criteria pollutant of greatest concern in the County, particularly within the Coastal Plateau. Ozone is a secondary pollutant, formed in the atmosphere by complex photochemical reactions involving the precursor pollutants of nitrogen oxides (NOx), reactive organic gases (ROG), and sunlight. The amount of ozone formed is dependent upon both the ambient concentration of the chemical precursors and the intensity and duration of sunlight. Consequently, ambient ozone concentration tends to vary seasonally with the weather. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR NOx is emitted primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels; ROG emissions are also generated by fossil fuel combustion and through the evaporation of petroleum products. Emissions of ROG and NOx are fairly equally divided between mobile and stationary sources in the County. Motor vehicles and electrical generation produce the majority of NOx emissions. Local concentrations of inert (non-reactive) pollutants (carbon monoxide, ozone, PM10) are primarily influenced by nearby sources of emissions and, thus, vary considerably between monitoring stations. SO2 emissions are mainly concentrated around areas where large quantities of fossil fuels are either burned in electrical production or where petroleum products are refined i.e., SO2 levels at the Nipomo Mesa and the Morro Bay power plant). Every three years the District performs an emissions inventory for the majority of permitted sources. The last complete inventory was conducted for the year 2007 emissions; Table 4.1-4 shows these emissions for ozone precursors and particulate matter. As seen in the table, the largest sources of ozone precursors are on-road vehicles, other mobile sources, and wildfires. The largest sources of particulate matter are wildfires, road dust, construction and demolition, and residential fuel combustion. Table 4.1-4 San Luis Obispo County Ozone Precursors and PM Emissions by Source Emission Sources Ozone Precursors ROG tpy) ROG NOx tpy) NOx Fuel Combustion 64 1% 586 4% Waste Disposal 8.1 0% 1.3 0% Cleaning/Surface Coating 1,023 11% 0.0 0% Petroleum Production and Marketing 372 4% 13 0% Industrial Processes 101 1% 37 0% Solvent Evaporation 604 6% 0.0 0% Miscellaneous Processes 1,445 15% 258 2% On-Road Motor Vehicles 2,623 27% 4,448 33% Other Mobile Sources 1,837 19% 7,563 56% Wildfires 1,581 16% 715 5% Total Ozone Precursor 9,657 13,620 Particulate Matter PM10 tpy) PM10 PM2.5 tpy) PM2.5 Wildfires 2,307 20% 1,956 46% Ships & Commercial Boats 366 3% 356 8% Cooking 123 1% 74 2% Waste Burning & Disposal 34 0% 32 1% Fugitive Wind Blown Dust 639 6% 106 2% Unpaved Road Dust 3,226 28% 321 7% Paved Road Dust 1,789 16% 266 6% Construction & Demolition 1,486 13% 150 3% Livestock 723 6% 150 3% 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.1-4 San Luis Obispo County Ozone Precursors and PM Emissions by Source Emission Sources Residential Fuel Combustion 631 6% 610 14% Mineral Processes 87 1% - - Farm Equipment - - 62 1% Off-Road Equipment - - 91 2% On-Road Motor Vehicle - - 114 3% Petroleum Refining - - 9 0% Total PM 11,410 4,298 Source SLOAPCD 2007 Emission Inventory Countywide Air Toxics Air toxics are substances that may cause or contribute to an increase in risk of cancer or serious illness, such as respiratory disease. A new, nationwide, air toxics control program was provided for within the federal 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). The federal program focuses on larger industrial sources that are of the highest national priority, such as chemical manufacturers. State and local air pollution control agencies adopt measures to minimize Californians’ exposure to toxic air contaminants (TAC). The State of California regulates TAC in several ways. The Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act (AB1807-1983) created a program to reduce the health risks from air toxics. This law expanded CARB authority to evaluate and control air toxics. An additional state law, the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act (AB2588-1987) supplements the original legislation by requiring a statewide air toxics inventory and by notifying local residents of significant risks from nearby sources. A 1992 amendment to the law (SB1731) requires that risks be reduced from these sources. The CARB has identified asbestos as a TAC. In its natural state, asbestos occurs throughout many areas. Serpentine is a very common rock type in California and was identified by the CARB as having the potential to contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for construction, grading, quarrying, and surface mining operations, prior to any grading activities at a site, a geologic analysis is necessary to determine if serpentine rock is present. Grading projects larger than 1 acre in serpentine rock would require prior SLOAPCD approval of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program. Serpentine rock is found in many regions of the County, including coastal areas, as far inland as Paso Robles, and the extreme eastern area along the San Andreas Fault. Figure 4.1-2 shows areas subject to the naturally occurring asbestos ATCM requirements. The Project Site is within one of these general areas that may include asbestos-containing rock. Greenhouse Gases The California legislature concluded that global climate change poses significant adverse effects to the environment (Assembly Bill [AB] 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006). In addition, the global scientific community has expressed a high confidence that climate 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR change is man-made and that climate change could lead to adverse changes around the globe Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Climate [IPCC] 2007). Consequently, the following sections analyze potential climate change emissions that may occur while implementing the Project. Global climate change is a change in the average weather of the earth, measured by wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. Although historical records show that dramatic fluctuations in temperature have occurred in the past, such as during previous ice ages, some data indicate that the current temperature record differs from previous climate changes in both rate and magnitude (AEP 2007). Figure 4.1-2 Areas Requiring Asbestos ATCM Geological Analysis and Requirements Source: SLOAPCD Website Global climate change caused by greenhouse gases (GHG) is currently one of the most widely debated scientific, economic, and political issues in the United States. Although many groups agree with the conclusions of the IPCC and the CARB, many groups feel the work is lacking. However, in terms of CEQA analysis, jurisdictions have developed significance criteria and directed CEQA documents to analyze emissions of GHG. Climate Change Background GHG include any gas that absorbs infrared radiation in the atmosphere. GHG include, but are not limited to, water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR fluorocarbons. The warming potential of different types of GHG varies. The global warming potential (GWP) is the relative measure of how much a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere. It compares the amount of heat trapped by a certain mass of the gas in question to the amount of the heat trapped by a similar mass of CO2. A GWP is calculated over a specific time interval, commonly 20, 100, or 500 years. GWP is expressed as a factor of CO2 (whose GWP is standardized to 1). For example, the 20 year GWP of methane is 72, which means if the same mass of methane and CO2 were introduced into the atmosphere, that methane will trap 72 times more heat than the CO2 over the next 20 years. Since GHG absorb different amounts of heat, a common reference gas, CO2, is used to relate the amount of heat absorbed to the amount of the gas emissions, referred to as CO2 equivalent, or CO2e. CO2e is the amount of GHG emitted multiplied by the global warming potential. The global warming potential of CO2 is therefore defined as one. The increase of GHG emissions has lead to the trapping and buildup of heat in the atmosphere near the earth’s surface, commonly known as the greenhouse effect. Put another way, the amount of GHG in the atmosphere regulates the earth’s temperature. Without natural GHG, the earth’s surface would be cooler (CARB 2006). Emissions from human activities, such as electricity production and vehicle operation, have increased the emissions of these gases into the atmosphere. Emissions of GHG in excess of natural ambient concentrations are thought to be responsible for the enhancement of the greenhouse effect and acceleration of climate change. Unlike criteria air pollutants and TAC, which are pollutants of regional and local concern, GHG are global pollutants and climate change is a global issue. Climate changes could lead to various changes in weather and rainfall patterns over time. According to the CARB, potential climate change impacts in California may include loss in snow pack, sea level rise, more extreme heat days per year, more high ozone days, more large forest fires, and more drought years (CARB 2006, 2007). Several recent studies have explored the possible negative consequences of climate change in California. These reports acknowledge that climate scientists’ understanding of the complex global climate system and the interplay of the various internal and external factors that affect climate change remain too limited to yield scientifically valid conclusions on such a localized scale. Substantial work at the national and international level has evaluated climatic impacts, but far less information is available on regional and local impacts. In addition, projecting regional impacts of climate change and variability relies on large-scale scenarios of changing climate parameters, using information that is typically at too coarse a scale to accurately assess regional impacts (Kiparsky 2003). The following example illustrates the difficulty of analyzing climate change on a regional or local level. Climate change modeling consistently predicts increasing temperatures; however, the ways that increasing temperatures will affect precipitation is not well understood. Studies have found that “considerable uncertainty about precise impacts of climate change on California hydrology and water resources will remain until we have more precise and consistent information about how precipitation patterns, timing, and intensity will change” (Kiparsky 2003). Even assuming that climate change leads to long-term increases in precipitation, climate change impact analysis is further complicated because no studies have identified or quantified the runoff impacts in particular watersheds of an increase in precipitation. Also, little is known about the 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR effects on groundwater recharge and water quality. Higher rainfall could lead to greater groundwater recharge, although reductions in spring runoff and higher evapotranspiration could reduce the amount of water available for recharge (Kiparsky 2003). The Department of Water Resources and the California Energy Commission have also noted the uncertain effect of climate change on water supply. In light of this dearth of accurate scientific information, analyzing the potential impacts a project would have on the regional or local environment is inherently complicated, and only limited conclusions can be drawn. Therefore, the analysis conducted in this report quantifies the GHG emissions levels but does not attempt to predict actual impacts associated with these emissions. Types of Greenhouse Gases Water vapor is the most abundant and variable GHG in the atmosphere. It is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Evaporation from the oceans is the main source of water vapor (approximately 85 percent). Other sources include evaporation from other water bodies, sublimation (change from solid to gas) from ice and snow, and transpiration from plant leaves (AEP 2007). Carbon dioxide is an odorless, colorless GHG with a GWP of 1. Natural sources include decomposition of dead organic matter; respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus; evaporation from oceans; and volcanoes. Man-made sources of carbon dioxide include burning fuels, such as coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. The interaction of man-made sources and natural sources of GHG and how they contribute to the atmospheric levels of GHG is a complex issue. Current concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere are approximately 379 parts per million (ppm); some say that concentrations may increase to 1,130 CO2e ppm by the year 2100 as a direct result of man-made sources (IPCC 2007). Some predict that this will result in an average global temperature rise of at least 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit by the year 2100 (IPCC 2007). Methane, a gas, is the main component of natural gas used in homes and has a GWP of approximately 21. Decaying organic matter in forests and oceans is a natural source of methane. Man-made sources include landfills, fermentation of manure, and cattle. Geological deposits known as natural gas fields contain methane, which is extracted for fuel. Nitrous oxide (N2O), also known as laughing gas, is a colorless gas with a GWP of approximately 310. Nitrous oxide is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including reactions that occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (e.g., nylon production, nitric acid production) also emit N2O. Nitrous oxide is used in rocket engines, as an aerosol spray propellant, and in race cars. During combustion, NOx (NOx is a generic term for mono-nitrogen oxides, NO and NO2) is produced as a criteria pollutant and is not the same as N2O. Very small quantities of N2O may be formed during fuel combustion by the reaction of nitrogen and oxygen (API 2004). Chlorofluorocarbons are synthetic gases formed by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane with chlorine or fluorine atoms. Chlorofluorocarbons are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically nonreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the earth’s surface). Chlorofluorocarbons were first synthesized in 1928 as refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. However, they destroy stratospheric ozone, and the Montreal Protocol stopped 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR their production in the 1990s. Fluorocarbons have a GWP between 140 and 11,700, with HFC- 152a at the low end and HFC-23 at the higher end. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. Its GWP of 23,900 is the highest of any gas. Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection. Table 4.1-5 shows a range of gases that contribute to GHG warming with their associated GWP. The table also shows their estimated lifetime in the atmosphere and the range in GWP over 20, 100, and 500 years. Although ozone is a GHG, unlike the other GHG, ozone in the troposphere is relatively short- lived and therefore is not global in nature. According to the CARB, it is difficult to determine accurately the contribution of ozone precursors (NOx and VOC) to global climate change (CARB 2006). Table 4.1-5 Global Warming Potential of Various Gases Gas Life in the Atmosphere GWP (average) Carbon Dioxide 50-200 1 Methane 12 21 Nitrous Oxide 120 310 HFC-23 264 11,700 HFC-125 32.6 2,800 HFC-134a 14.6 1,300 HFC-143a 48.3 3,800 HFC-152a 1.5 140 HFC-227ea 36.5 2,900 HFC-236fa 209 6,300 HFC-4310mee 17.1 1,300 CF4 50,000 6,500 C2F6 10,000 9,200 C4F10 2,600 7,000 C6F14 3,200 7,400 SF6 3,200 23,900 Source: EPA 2007 Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions The quantification of GHG emissions associated with a project can be complex and relies on a number of assumptions. GHG emissions are global because emissions from one location could affect the entire planet, and they are not limited to local impacts. Therefore, off-site impacts, such as vehicle emissions and other associated transportation emissions, are included. Emissions are generally classified as either direct or indirect. Direct emissions are associated with the production of GHG emissions at the Project Site. These include the combustion of 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR natural gas in heaters or stoves, the combustion of fuel in engines and construction vehicles, and fugitive emissions from valves and connections, which include methane as a component. Indirect emissions include the emissions from vehicles (both gasoline and diesel) delivering materials and equipment to the site and the use of electricity. Electricity also produces GHG emissions because fossil fuels generate some electricity. This report utilizes the California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol and the CARB Compendium of Emission Factors and Methods to Support Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions as methods to calculate GHG emissions (CCAR 2009; CARB 2007c). To quantify the emissions associated with electrical generation, the resource mix for a particular area must be determined. The resource mix is the proportion of electricity generated from different sources. Electricity generated from coal or oil combustion produces greater GHG emissions than electricity generated from natural gas combustion because of the higher carbon content of coal and oil. Electricity generated from wind turbines, hydroelectric dams, or nuclear power is assigned zero greenhouse gas emissions. Although these sources have some GHG emissions associated with the manufacture of wind generators, the mining and enrichment of uranium, and the displacement of forest areas for reservoirs, these emissions are not included in the lifecycle analysis because they are assumed to be relatively small compared to the electricity generated. For example, estimates of nuclear power GHG emissions associated with uranium mining and enrichment range up to approximately 60 pounds per megawatt hour (lbs/MWh), or approximately 5 percent of natural gas turbine GHG emissions (Canada 1998). Detailed information on the power generation plants, their contribution to the area electricity resource mix, and their associated emissions have been developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database eGRID). This analysis used the most recent version of eGRID, released in April 2007 (EPA 2007b). eGRID is developed from a variety of data collected by the EPA, the Energy Information Administration, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. eGRID includes electricity generated from coal, gas, oil, other fossil fuels (e.g., solid waste, tire- derived fuel, hydrogen, methanol, coke gas), biomass (e.g., wood, paper, agricultural byproducts, landfill gas, digester gas), wind, and nuclear, hydroelectric, geothermal, and solar resources. Each of these is assigned criteria, as well as GHG emission levels, based on facility specifics. Wind, biomass, and nuclear, hydroelectric, geothermal, and solar resources are assigned zero GHG emissions. eGRID assigns zero CO2 emissions to generation from the combustion of all biomass because these organic materials would otherwise release CO2 (or other GHG) into the atmosphere through natural decomposition. The other fuels are assigned GHG emissions levels based on the fuel carbon content. This report analyzed the eGRID database to assign a GHG emissions level to electricity generated for the operations. Table 4.1-6 shows the resource mix and estimated GHG emissions for a range of areas. Approximately half of the electricity in the U.S. is generated from coal. Nationwide, GHG emissions from all electricity production sources are approximately 1,363 lbs/MWh. The emissions rate is lower in western states primarily because of increased use of 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR hydroelectric resources and gas. The California Independent Service Operator (CalISO) area which includes some generation outside of California) has a low GHG emission rate of approximately 687 lbs/MWh due to the use of hydroelectric, nuclear, and renewable energy sources. Table 4.1-6 Electricity Generation Resource Mix and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Resource Mixa United States Western States WECC) CalISO Service Areab Coal 50.2 34.2 1.2 Oil 3.0 0.5 1.2 Gas 17.4 26.3 51.1 Nuclear 20.0 9.9 16.8 Hydro 6.6 24.3 17.3 Biomass 1.4 1.3 3.2 Wind 0.3 0.9 2.4 Solar 0.0 0.1 0.3 Geo 0.3 2.0 5.5 Other Fossil 0.5 0.3 0.9 Other 0.1 0.0 0.0 Non-Renewables 91.3 71.3 71.3 Renewables 8.7 28.7 28.7 Non-Hydro Renewables 2.1 4.3 11.4 CO2 Rate, lb/MWh 1363 1107 687 a. Resource Mix is the percentage of total mega-watt hours. b. The Mohave Generating Station is not included in CalISO Service Areas because it shut down in 2005. Source: eGRID database with modifications and updates Since the Mohave Generating Station shut down in 2005, it was removed from the eGRID database and calculations. The GHG emission rate from CalISO electricity is approximately 45 percent less than the rate associated with direct natural gas combustion due to the electricity resource mix including resources that do not create GHG emissions (e.g., hydroelectric, nuclear, and renewables). Indirect GHG emissions are also associated with water use, since electricity would be necessary to pump and treat water used at the Project Site. Indirect GHG emissions associated with trash hauling and other services that might visit the Project Site are incorporated through the inclusion of the travel of diesel trucks that would visit and service the Project Site. National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Fossil fuel combustion is responsible for the vast majority of the U.S.’s GHG emissions, and CO2 is the primary GHG. In 2005, total U.S. GHG emissions were 7.26 billion metric tons of carbon equivalent (MMTCE); 84 percent of which were CO2 emissions (EPA 2007). In 2005, 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR approximately 33 percent of GHG emissions were associated with transportation and approximately 41 percent were associated with electricity generation. Statewide Greenhouse Gas Emissions With a population of 33 million, California is the most populous state in the U.S. In 2004, California produced 492 MMTCE of GHG emissions (CARB 2008b). Overall, 81 percent of California’s emissions are CO2 from fossil fuel combustion (CARB 2008b). The transportation sector is the single largest contributor of California’s GHG emissions, producing 41 percent of the state’s total GHG emissions in 2004. In contrast, electrical generation produced more than half that, at 22 percent. Nonetheless, California ranks fourth lowest of the 50 states in CO2 emissions per capita. Figure 4.1-3 shows the breakdown of California GHG emissions since 1990. Figure 4.1-3 California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source: CARB 2009, Allowance levels shown for Cap-and-Trade legislation Local Greenhouse Gas Emissions In July 2008, the County Board of Supervisors made a commitment to calculate San Luis Obispo County’s contribution to global climate change through the development of an Energywise Plan Climate Action Plan), which it adopted on November 22, 2011. The GHG Inventory estimates 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR that the unincorporated areas of the County emitted approximately 917,700 metric tons of CO2- equivalent emissions in the baseline year 2006. The transportation sector was by far the largest contributor to emissions (40 percent). Emissions from the commercial/industrial and residential sectors accounted for 24 and 15 percent of the total, respectively. Emissions from other sources, including livestock, select aircraft operations, and agricultural equipment, comprised the remaining 21 percent of the total. 4.1.1.3 Current Project Site Emissions As detailed in Chapter 2.0, Project Description, current activity levels at the Project Site are minimal, with deliveries and visits to the site occurring sporadically. For example, visits by contractors to inspect netting enclosures and complete routine maintenance activities occur two to four times per month (up to 48 trips times per year), and two persons travel approximately 20 days per year (up to 40 trips per year) for groundwater, stormwater, and surface water monitoring. Additionally, an average of one truck per quarter-year (four trips per year) takes place to haul debris. Some additional activities may also occur due to on-site backhoe and generator operations possibly related to hauling debris. Table 4.1-7 summarizes the emissions from the current Project Site-related activities. The table includes both criteria emissions and greenhouse gas emissions. Calculations are shown in Appendix B under the current emissions section. Table 4.1-7 Current Activities Emissions Activity Criteria Pollutants GHG tons CO ROG NOx SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 CH4 N2O Peak Day, Pounds Per Day Off-site Vehicle Travel 1.20 0.10 0.55 0.00 11.46 2.44 - - - On-site Equipment 4.79 1.34 8.43 0.01 0.71 0.70 - - - On-site Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.11 1.45 - - - Total 5.99 1.44 8.98 0.01 22.28 4.59 - - - Annual, Tons Per Year Off-site Vehicle Travel 0.01 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.032 0.007 0.86 0.001 0.019 On-site Equipment 0.01 0.003 0.02 0.00 0.001 0.001 1.27 0.002 0.005 On-site Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.000 0.000 Total 0.02 0.003 0.02 0.00 0.25 0.04 2.13 0.003 0.024 Note: Assumes on-site emissions associated with a backhoe and generator operating 4 days per year. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.1.2 Regulatory Setting Federal, state, and local agencies have established standards and regulations that govern the Project. The following sections summarize the regulatory settings for air quality that apply to new development within the local air basin and the historic and most recent efforts on addressing GHG emissions. 4.1.2.1 Air Quality Federal Regulations The Clean Air Act of 1970 directs attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The 1990 Amendments to this Act included new provisions that address air pollutant emissions that affect local, regional, and global air quality. The EPA is responsible for implementing the Clean Air Act and establishing the NAAQS for criteria pollutants. In 1997, the EPA adopted revisions to the Ozone and Particulate Matter Standards in the Clean Air Act. These revisions included 8-hour ozone standards and particulate matter standards for PM2.5. However, in May 1999 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia remanded the ozone standards. In January 2001, the EPA issued a “Proposed Response to Remand” that declared that the revised ozone standard should remain at 0.08 ppm, as established with the 1997 revisions. In March 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Clean Air Act as the EPA interpreted it, setting health-protective air quality standards for ground-level ozone and particulate matter. In April 2004, the EPA issued its Final Nonattainment Area Designations for the Eight-Hour Ozone Standard. Air Quality Management Plan Under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, the EPA requires each state that has not attained the NAAQS to prepare an Air Quality Management Plan, which is a separate local plan detailing how to meet the federal standards. The governor of each state designates a local agency to prepare these plans, which are then incorporated into a State Implementation Plan. Emission Standards for Non-Road Diesel Engines To reduce emissions from non-road diesel equipment, the EPA established a series of increasingly strict emission standards for new non-road diesel engines. Tier 1 standards were phased in from 1996 to 2000 (year of manufacture), depending on the engine horsepower category. Tier 2 standards were phased in from 2001 to 2006. Tier 3 standards were phased in from 2006 to 2008. Tier 4 standards, which likely will require add-on emission control equipment, will be phased in from 2008 until 2015. These standards will apply to construction equipment. State Regulations California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has jurisdiction over all air pollutant sources in the state; it delegates responsibility for stationary sources to local air districts and retains authority over emissions from mobile sources. The County’s local air district is the SLOAPCD. The CARB establishes the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). Comparing the criteria pollutant concentrations in ambient air to the CAAQS determines state attainment status for criteria pollutants in a given region. The CARB, in partnership with local California air 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR quality management districts, developed a pollutant-monitoring network to aid attainment of CAAQS. The network consists of numerous monitoring stations throughout California that monitor and report various pollutants’ concentrations in ambient air. California Clean Air Act The California Clear Air Act (CCAA) went into effect in January 1, 1989, and was amended in 1992 (California Health and Safety Code, Division 26). The CCAA mandates achieving the health-based CAAQS at the earliest practical date. Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act of 1987 The Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB2588) requires an inventory of air toxics emissions from individual facilities, an assessment of health risk, and notification of potential significant health risk (California Health & Safety Code, Division 26, Part 6). California Diesel Fuel Regulations With the California Diesel Fuel Regulations, the CARB set sulfur limitations for diesel fuel sold in California for use in on-road and off-road motor vehicles. The rule initially excluded harbor craft and intrastate locomotives, but it later included them with a 2004 rule amendment. Under this rule, diesel fuel used in motor vehicles, except harbor craft and intrastate locomotives, has been limited to 500-ppm sulfur since 1993. This sulfur limit was later reduced to 15-ppm, effective September 1, 2006. 4.1.2.2 Local In 1967, California passed legislation that placed the primary responsibility for controlling air pollution at the local level. In April 1970, the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors formed the SLOAPCD, which included a decision-making body known as the SLOAPCD Board of Directors. Over the past 30 years, the SLOAPCD has adopted and implemented nearly 100 rules and currently has nearly 1,070 individual permits and agricultural registrations, and it operates 850 facilities. In 1994, revisions to state law changed the composition of the Board of Directors to include all five County supervisors plus one city council member from each of the seven incorporated cities. As part of the California Clean Air Act, the SLOAPCD is required to develop a plan to achieve and maintain the state ozone standard by the earliest practicable date. To this end, the SLOAPCD developed the Clean Air Plan (CAP). The latest CAP is dated 2001, adopted by the SLOAPCD at a hearing on March 26, 2002, and addresses state requirements by updating the 1991 CAP SLOAPCD 2001). The 1991 CAP, adopted by the SLOAPCD in 1992, contained a comprehensive set of control measures designed to reduce ozone precursor emissions from a wide variety of stationary and mobile sources. The 2001 CAP, similar to the 1998 CAP, is mainly a continuation of the 1995 CAP and proposes no new control measures. Control measures proposed in the CAP include vapor recovery, solvent content reduction, improved fuel combustion, fuel switching or electrification, chemical or catalytic reduction, reduced vehicle use, and new source reviews. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The SLOAPCD also issues annual reports that address issues such as air quality summaries for each year as well as air quality trends. The SLOAPCD developed a number of rules that are potentially applicable to this Project, including: Rule 204 – Requirements (new source review); Rule 219 – Toxics new source review; Rule 401 – Visible emissions, limits on offsite dust opacity; Rule 402 – Nuisance; Rule 403 – Particulate matter emission standards; Rule 405 – Nitrogen oxides emission standards, limitations, and prohibitions; Rule 406 – Carbon monoxide emission standards and limitations; Rule 407 – Organic material emission standards; Rule 412 – Airborne toxic control measures; Rule 417 – Control of fugitive emissions of volatile organic compounds; Rule 419 – Petroleum pits, ponds, sumps, well cellars and wastewater separators; Rule 420 – Cutback asphalt paving materials; Rule 425 – Storage of volatile organic compounds; Rule 430 – Control of oxides of nitrogen from industrial, institutional, commercial boilers, steam generators, and process heaters; Rule 431 – Stationary internal combustion engines; and Rule 433 – Architectural coatings. 4.1.2.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulations Federal Regulations Clean Air Act In the past, the U.S. EPA has not regulated GHG under the Clean Air Act. However, the U.S. Supreme Court recently held that the EPA can, and should, consider regulating motor-vehicle GHG emissions. In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, 12 states and cities, including California, in conjunction with several environmental organizations sued to force the EPA to regulate GHG as a pollutant pursuant to the Clean Air Act (U.S. Supreme Court No. 05- 1120; 127 S.Ct. 1438 (2007)). The Court ruled that GHG fit within the Clean Air Act’s definition of a pollutant and that the EPA’s reason for not regulating GHG was insufficiently grounded. Mandatory reporting requirements for a number of industries are specified under 40 CFR Section 98. The final 40 CFR Section 98 applies to certain downstream facilities that emit GHG and to certain upstream suppliers of fossil fuels and industrial GHG. For suppliers, the GHG emissions reported are those that would result from combustion or use of the products supplied. The rule also includes provisions to ensure the accuracy of emissions data through monitoring, recordkeeping and verification requirements. The mandatory reporting requirements generally apply to facilities that produce more than 25,000 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR State Regulations and Programs Executive Order S-3-05 The 2005 California Executive Order S-3-05 established the following GHG emission-reduction targets for California: By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) is charged with coordinating oversight of efforts to meet these targets and formed the Climate Action Team to carry out the Order. Emission reduction strategies or programs developed by the Climate Action Team to meet the emission targets are outlined in a March 2006 report (CalEPA 2006). The Climate Action Team also provided strategies and input to the CARB Scoping Plan. Assembly Bill 1493 In 2002, the legislature declared in AB 1493 (the Pavley regulations) that global warming was a matter of increasing concern for public health and the environment in the state. It cited several risks that California faces from climate change, including reduction in the state’s water supply, increased air pollution due to higher temperatures, harm to agriculture, and increase in wildfires, damage to the coastline, and economic losses caused by higher food, water, energy, and insurance prices. Furthermore, the legislature stated that technological solutions for reducing GHG emissions would stimulate California’s economy and provide jobs. Accordingly, AB 1493 required the CARB to develop and adopt the nation’s first GHG emission standards for automobiles. The CARB responded by adopting CO2-equivalent fleet average emission standards. The standards will be phased in from 2009 to 2016, reducing emissions by 22 percent in the “near term” (2009 to 2012) and 30 percent in the “mid-term” (2013 to 2016), as compared to 2002 fleets. The legislature passed amendments to AB 1493 in September 2009. Implementation of AB 1493 requires a waiver from the EPA, which was granted in June 2009. Assembly Bill 32 AB 32 codifies California’s GHG emissions target and requires the state to reduce global warming emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. It further directs the CARB to enforce the statewide cap that would begin phasing in by 2012. AB 32 was signed and passed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on September 27, 2006. Key milestones of AB 32 include: June 20, 2007 - Identification of “discrete early action GHG emission-reduction measures.” January 1, 2008 - Identification of the 1990 baseline GHG emissions levels and approval of a statewide limit equivalent to that level. Adoption of reporting and verification requirements concerning GHG emissions. January 1, 2009 - Adoption of a scoping plan for achieving GHG emission reductions. January 1, 2010 - Adoption and enforcement of regulations to implement the actions. January 1, 2011 - Regulatory adoption of GHG emission limits and reduction measures. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR January 1, 2012 - GHG emission limits and reduction measures become enforceable. Since the passage of AB 32, the CARB published ‘Proposed Early Actions to Mitigate Climate Change in California’. This publication indicated that the issue of GHG emissions in CEQA and General Plans was being deferred for later action, so the publication did not discuss any early action measures generally related to CEQA or to land use decisions. California Senate Bill 1368 In 2006, the California legislature passed SB 1368, which requires the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to develop and adopt a “greenhouse gases emission performance standard” by March 1, 2007, for private electric utilities under its regulation. The PUC adopted an interim standard on January 25, 2007, requiring that all new long-term commitments for base load generation involve power plants that have emissions no greater than a combined cycle gas turbine plant. That level is established at 1,100 lbs/MWh of CO2. The California Energy Commission has also adopted similar rules. Senate Bill 97 – CEQA: Greenhouse Gas Emissions In August 2007, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law SB 97 – CEQA: Greenhouse Gas Emissions stating, “This bill advances a coordinated policy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by directing the Office of Planning and Research and the Resources Agency to develop CEQA guidelines on how state and local agencies should analyze, and when necessary, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.” Specifically, SB 97 requires the Office of Planning and Research (OPR), by July 1, 2009, to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Resources Agency guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA, including, but not limited to, effects associated with transportation or energy consumption. The Resources Agency would be required to certify and adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010. OPR would be required to periodically update the guidelines to incorporate new information or criteria established by the CARB pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. SB 97 also identifies a limited number of types of projects that would be exempt under CEQA from analyzing GHG emissions. On January 7, 2009, OPR issued its draft CEQA guidelines revisions pursuant to SB 97. On March 16, 2010, the Office of Administrative Law approved the Amendments and filed them with the Secretary of State for inclusion in the California Code of Regulations. The Amendments became effective on March 18, 2010. Office of Planning and Research Technical Advisory and Preliminary Draft CEQA Guidelines Amendments for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Consistent with SB 97, on March 18, 2010, the CEQA Guidelines were amended to include references to GHG emissions. The amendments offer guidance regarding the steps lead agencies should take to address climate change in their CEQA documents. According to OPR, lead agencies should determine whether GHG may be generated by a proposed project, and if so, quantify or estimate the GHG emissions by type and source. Second, the lead agency must assess whether those emissions are individually or cumulatively significant. When assessing whether a project’s effects on climate change are cumulatively considerable, even though its GHG contribution may be individually limited, the lead agency must consider the impact of the project when viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR probable future projects. Finally, if the lead agency determines that the GHG emissions from the proposed project are potentially significant, it must investigate and implement ways to avoid, reduce, or otherwise mitigate the impacts of those emissions. The Amendments do not identify a threshold of significance for GHG emissions, nor do they prescribe assessment methodologies or specific mitigation measures. The Preliminary Amendments maintain CEQA discretion for lead agencies to establish thresholds of significance based on individual circumstances. The guidelines developed by OPR provide the lead agency with discretion in determining what methodology is used in assessing the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions in the context of a particular project. This guidance is provided because the methodology for assessing GHG emissions is expected to evolve over time. The OPR guidance also states that the lead agency can rely on qualitative or other performance based standards for estimating the significance of GHG emissions. California Air Resources Board: Scoping Plan On December 11, 2008, the CARB adopted the Scoping Plan as directed by AB 32 (CARB 2008a). The Scoping Plan proposes a set of actions designed to reduce overall GHG emissions in California. The measures in the Scoping Plan approved by the CARB will be in place by 2012, with further implementation details and regulations to be developed, followed by the rulemaking process to meet the 2012 deadline. Measures include a cap-and-trade system, car standards, low carbon fuel standards, landfill gas control methods, energy efficiency, green buildings, renewable electricity standards, and refrigerant management programs. California businesses are required to report their annual GHG emissions. This requirement is contained within sections 95100-95133 of Title 17, California Code of Regulations. It establishes who must report GHG emissions to the CARB and sets forth the requirements for measuring, calculating, reporting and verifying those emissions. The rule specifies a reporting threshold of 25,000 metric tonnes of CO2. California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol The California Climate Action Registry is a program of the Climate Action Reserve and serves as a voluntary GHG registry. The California Climate Action Registry was formed in 2001 when a group of chief executive officers, who were investing in energy efficiency projects that reduced their organizations’ GHG emissions, asked the state to create a place to accurately report their emissions history. The California Climate Action Registry publishes a General Reporting Protocol, which provides the principles, approach, methodology, and procedures to estimate such emissions. California Air Resource Board Proposed Mandatory Reporting Regulation The CARB approved a mandatory reporting regulation in December 2007, which became effective January 2009 (which appears at sections 95100-95133 of title 17, California Code of Regulations), which requires the mandatory reporting of GHG emissions for specific industries emitting more than 25,000 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR California Air Resource Board Proposed Cap-and-Trade Regulation The CARB has recently adopted a rule to develop a cap-and-trade type system applicable to specific industries that emit more than 25,000 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year. The AB 32 Scoping Plan identifies a cap-and-trade program as one of the strategies California will employ to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that cause climate change. Under cap- and-trade, an overall limit on GHG emissions from capped sectors will be established by the cap- and-trade program, and facilities subject to the cap will be able to trade permits (allowances) to emit GHGs. The program started on January 1, 2012, with an enforceable compliance obligation beginning with the 2013 GHG emissions from stationary sources. The petroleum and natural gas systems sector is covered starting in 2013 for stationary and related combustion, process vents and flare emissions if the total emissions from these sources exceed 25,000 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year. Suppliers of Natural Gas and transportation fuels are covered beginning in 2015 for combustion emissions from the total volume of natural gas delivered to non-covered entity or for transportation fuels. Facilities subject to cap-and-trade are not automatically exempt from the significant evaluation under CEQA. Proposed projects must quantify GHG emissions and determine the significance of a project’s environmental impact. Local Regulations and Programs City Climate Action Plan The City adopted a Climate Action Plan in July 2012. The CAP includes a series of steps accomplished from 2010 thru 2012 including research, outreach, local policy audit, and strategy review. Research includes review of climate science, climate planning guidance documents, climate policy enacted in other jurisdictions, and existing local policies and programs already serving to reduce GHG emissions. Community strategies for climate change adaptation and reduction of GHG emissions include strategies related to (1) Buildings; (2) Renewable Energy; 3) Transportation & Land Use; (4) Water; (5) Solid Waste; and (6) Parks & Open Space. Strategies are also included that help reduce GHG emissions associated with City Government Operations. The adopted target is a reduction of community-wide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, consistent with AB 32. The City’s community-wide emissions in 2005 totaled 264,240 MTCO2e. Half of community emissions come from transportation sources. County Climate Action Plan The County Department of Planning and Building adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) on November 22, 2011, as a blueprint for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the Department aims to establish a Green Building Ordinance to improve energy efficiency in new and existing development. The CAP will focus on local actions to reduce GHG emissions through energy efficiencies, including: retrofitting existing buildings; reversing rural sprawl; and increasing use of non-fossil fuels such as solar and wind energy (SLOC 2011). The County inventory in 2010 is estimated to be 942,080 MTCO2e with 40 percent of GHG emissions coming from transportation sources. City General Plan, Conservation, and Open Space Element The City’s General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element addresses issues such as energy efficiency and green building in new development, green building standards, and green energy utilities, which would serve to reduce GHG emissions. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR County General Plan, Conservation, and Open Space Element The County Board of Supervisors in 2010 adopted a comprehensive Conservation and Open Space Element with a focus on reducing GHG emissions, increasing energy efficiency, and using local renewable energy. A preliminary analysis of the Project’s consistency with applicable air quality plans and policies is provided in Appendix E. 4.1.3 Significance Criteria According to the April 2012 SLOAPCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, project impacts may be considered significant if one or more of the following special conditions apply: If any of the thresholds are exceeded; If the project has the ability to emit hazardous or toxic air pollutants in the close proximity of sensitive receptors such that an increased cancer risk affects the population; If the project has the potential to emit diesel particulate matter in an area of human exposure, even if overall emissions are low; Remodeling or demolition operations where asbestos-containing materials will be encountered; If naturally occurring asbestos has been identified in the project area; If the project has the ability to emit hazardous or toxic air pollutants in the close proximity of sensitive receptors such as schools, churches, and hospitals; If the project results in a nuisance odor problem to sensitive receptors; and If more than 4 acres are graded at any given time. The CEQA Air Quality Handbook defines thresholds for long-term operational emissions and short-term construction related emissions. Depending on the level of exceedance of a defined threshold, the SLOAPCD has established varying levels of mitigation. 4.1.3.1 Operational Thresholds Table 4.1-8 shows the threshold criteria established by the SLOAPCD to determine a project’s significance and appropriate mitigation level for long-term operational emissions (i.e., vehicular and area source emissions). Emissions that equal or exceed the designated threshold levels are considered potentially significant and should be mitigated. For projects requiring air quality mitigation, the SLOAPCD has developed a list of both standard and discretionary mitigation strategies tailored to the type of project proposed: residential, commercial, or industrial. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.1-8 SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Operational Emissions Impacts Pollutant Daily Annual ROG + NOx 25 pounds 25 tons Diesel Particulate Matter 1.25 pounds - Fugitive Dust Particulate Matter (PM10) 25 pounds 25 tons CO 550 pounds - Source: SLOAPCD 2012 Construction Thresholds Use of heavy equipment and earth-moving operations during Project construction generates fugitive dust and combustion emissions that may have substantial temporary impacts on local air quality. Fugitive dust emissions would result from land clearing, demolition, ground excavation, cut and fill operations, and equipment traffic over temporary roads. Combustion emissions, such as NOx and ROG, are most significant when using diesel-fueled equipment, such as loaders, dozers, haul trucks, compressors, and generators. Table 4.1-9 lists construction thresholds. Table 4.1-9 SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Construction Emissions Impacts Pollutant Daily Quarterly Tier 1 Quarterly Tier 2 ROG + NOx 137 pounds 2.5 tons 6.3 tons Diesel Particulate Matter 7 pounds 0.13 tons 0.32 tons Fugitive Dust Particulate Matter (PM10) - 2.5 tons - Source: SLOAPCD 2012 Exceeding Tier 1 emissions thresholds requires the implementation of a listing of standard mitigation measures and best available control technologies (BACT). Tier 2 requires the implementation of a construction activity management plan in addition to Tier 1 requirements. If emission levels cannot be decreased to less than the Tier thresholds, then off-site mitigation may be necessary. As per the SLOAPCD Handbook, if the construction phase is longer than 90 days, the daily threshold (for ROG + NOx and diesel particulate matter) is not applicable. Greenhouse Gases Thresholds The SLOAPCD adopted GHG thresholds on March 28, 2012, and updated their CEQA Handbook in April 2012 to incorporate the new thresholds shown in Table 4.1-10. Only a few air districts in California have adopted thresholds for GHG emissions. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.1-10 SLOAPCD Board-Approved GHG Thresholds For SLO County District/Area Threshold Level MTCO2e Notes SLOAPCD 10,000/year (industrial), 1,150/year (residential, commercial & mixed- use), or 4.9/service population (SP)/yr (residents + employees), or Project is deemed consistent with a qualified climate action plan. Adopted March 28, 2012 Notes: San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District = SLOAPCD The County of San Luis Obispo and the City of San Luis Obispo began implementing the SLOAPCD recommended thresholds for Planning Agencies on March 28, 2012 and May 1, 2012 respectively. Based on the County and City implemented GHG thresholds (see Table 4.1-10) for industrial development, the following thresholds are proposed for this EIR. The Project would be less than significant if it meets these criteria: Industrial/commercial development Project emits below 10,000 MTCO2e per year, including transportation with amortized construction emissions; Commercial below 1,150; and/or Commercial below the 4.9 service population; and/or Consistent with the applicable qualified Climate Action Plan (City or County). Air Toxic Health Risk Thresholds If a project has the potential to emit toxic or hazardous air pollutants, or is located in close proximity to sensitive receptors, impacts may be considered significant due to increased cancer risk for the affected population, even at a very low level of emissions. Such projects may be required to prepare a risk assessment to determine the potential level of risk associated with their operations. Pursuant to the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 42301.6 AB 3205) and Public Resources Code Section 21151.8, subd. (a)(2), any new school, or proposed industrial or commercial project site located within 1000 feet of a school must be referred to the SLOAPCD for review. As defined in the CAPCOA guidance document (CAPCOA 2009) there are basically two types of land use projects that have the potential to cause long-term public health risk impacts: Type A Projects: new proposed land use projects that generate toxic air contaminants (such as gasoline stations, distribution facilities or asphalt batch plants) that impact sensitive receptors. Air districts across California are uniform in their recommendation to use the significance thresholds that have been established under each district’s “Hot Spots” and permitting programs. The SLOAPCD has defined the excess cancer risk significance threshold at 10 in a million for Type A projects in the County; and, Type B Projects: new land use projects that will place sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units) in close proximity to existing toxics sources (e.g., freeway). The SLOAPCD has 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR established a CEQA health risk threshold of 89 in-a-million for the analysis of projects proposed in close proximity to toxic sources. This value represents the population weighted average health risk caused by ambient background concentrations of toxic air contaminants in the County. The SLOAPCD recommends Health Risk screening and, if necessary, Health Risk Assessment (HRA) for any residential or sensitive receptor development proposed in proximity to toxic sources. If a project is located near a sensitive receptor (e.g., school, hospital, dwelling unit(s)), its level of impact may be considered significant, even if other criteria do not apply. The health effects of a project's emissions may be more pronounced if they impact a considerable number of children, elderly, or people with compromised respiratory or cardiac conditions. 4.1.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The remediation portion of the Project (including restoration) would generate air emissions due to the following activities: Construction equipment and fugitive dust; Excavation of contaminated soils; Paving and asphalt emissions; Potential releases of asbestos due to demolition or grading; and Off-site vehicles emissions associated with workers commuting and from off-site materials hauling. The following sub-activities were separately examined as part of the air quality analysis, including scheduling, soil movement, areas disturbed, demolition activities and unpaved road travel. 1. Building Demolition 2. Pipeline Removal 3. Marsh Debris Removal 4. Concrete Debris Removal 5. Nursery 6. Mobilization 7. Entrance Improvements 8. Crushing Operation 9. Flower Mound Borrow/Rough Grading 10. OU#3 Reservoir4 Cap/Rough Pad Grades 11. OU#1 Cap Construction 12. South Tank Farm Creek Restoration 13. OU#2 Reservoir 5 Cap 14. OU#2 Reservoir 7 Cap 15. OU#4 North Marsh Remediation 16. OU#4 Reservoir 3 Cap 17. OU#4 PPSH Remediation 18. North Tank Farm Creek Restoration 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 19. East Fork San Luis Creek Restoration 20. Borrow Area Restoration 21. Restoration Monitoring 22. Borrow Area 2 23. Borrow Area 3 24. Access Roads 25. Staging Area Many of the activities overlap in timing, producing an array of peak day and peak quarter assessments. The specific details on each of these activities are shown in the Air Appendix under the section Methodology: Emission Factors and Inputs. The remainder of this section discusses the impacts associated with the remediation air emissions, odor and air toxic emission impacts. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.1 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate ROG + NOx and Diesel PM emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Remediation Class II Air emissions of criteria pollutants (CO, ROG, NOx, SO2, and PM) during construction would result from the use of construction equipment with internal combustion engines (e.g., backhoes, cranes), and off-site vehicles (e.g., construction employee commuter vehicles and trucks delivering equipment and hauling materials to and from the site). Air emissions from construction equipment were estimated using the emission factors and equations from the CalEEMod software, and the assumptions on the duration and personnel detailed in Chapter 2.0, Project Description. Emissions from off-site vehicles were estimated using the recent EMFAC2011 factors for light duty automobiles, light duty trucks and heavy duty trucks at different speeds. Appendix B, the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Appendix, includes details on the construction equipment and periods of operation for each equipment piece. Although CalEEMod factors were generally used, the emissions calculations were performed in a spreadsheet, as it is difficult, using the CalEEMod program, to assess construction impacts associated with a remediation project with different activities (i.e., soil offgassing, pipe removal offgassing), ongoing at different locations and at different times (see Appendix B sections Methodology, Methodology: Emission Factors and sections On-site Construction Equipment Emissions Calculations by Activity, Off-site Emissions by Activity and On-site Fugitive Dust Emissions). ROG emissions from contaminated soils were estimated based on studies conducted by the EPA EPA 1992), which estimated hydrocarbon emissions for soil contaminated with different materials. Heavier hydrocarbon contamination was assumed (nonane, a heavier alkane hydrocarbon), as the oil would be weathered. Based on the risk assessment reports (see Appendix H) prepared for the Project, “the soil at the Site is composed predominately of higher molecular 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR weight hydrocarbons (carbon fraction range C10-C40),” data which was approximated using the surrogate of nonane (C9). ROG emissions associated with pipeline removal were also calculated based on the volume of pipeline to be removed, assuming that the entire pipeline volume was full of hydrocarbon vapors at standard conditions. Emissions were calculated for each activity and for each month to determine the peak quarter and peak day operating scenarios. The construction schedule provided by the Applicant was utilized to determine what activities might occur simultaneously or during the same quarter. Emissions associated with the use of demolition charges associated with blasting at the Flower Mound area would be minimal, but have been tabulated in the air appendix. According to AP-42 section 15.9, the primary pollutant emitted from the use of the Demolition Block Charge is carbon dioxide. Criteria pollutants and hazardous air pollutants from demolition are emitted at low levels. Emissions that occur in Santa Barbara County were also calculated, as truck trips would occur within Santa Barbara County to haul soils to the Santa Maria Landfill. However, no construction activities would occur within Santa Barbara County. Table 4.1-11 summarizes construction air emissions as they pertain to the SLOAPCD thresholds. Detailed emissions levels are shown in Appendix B (see sections on Emissions Summaries by Activity and Month (both on-site and off-site), On-site Construction Equipment Emissions Calculations by Activity, Off-site Emissions by Activity and On-site Fugitive Dust Emissions). Table 4.1-11 Unmitigated Remediation Emissions PEAK DAY (lbs/day) ROG + NOx Diesel PM SLO County 1092.3 30.5 Thresholds 137.0 7.0 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes SB County 56.4 2.2 Combined SLOC & SBC 1,148.7 32.7 PEAK QUARTER (tons/qrtr) ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust SLO County 33.1 0.9 19.5 Thresholds 2.5 0.1 2.5 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes SB County 1.7 0.01 - Combined SLOC & SBC 34.8 0.9 19.5 Note: Santa Barbara County does not have a peak day or quarter threshold for construction emissions. Appendix B provides an introductory section on the calculation methodologies and inputs to the calculations. Peak day numbers within SLOC include transportation of contaminated soils to Buttonwillow. Emissions of ROG + NOx exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds for the Project for peak day and peak quarter. However, as the construction activity would last for more than 90 days, the daily thresholds would not apply (as per the SLOAPCD Handbook). Impacts would still be considered significant due to the peak quarter emissions, but as shown below, mitigable. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The peak day and quarter scenarios were determined to be the following: OU#2 Reservoir 5 Cap, OU#2 Reservoir 7 Cap, OU#4 North Marsh Remediation along with the associated offsite vehicle transportation, including transportation of contaminated soils to Buttonwillow. Emissions of diesel particulate matter would result from the use of diesel powered construction equipment and vehicles. Diesel PM emissions would exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds for the Project for peak day and peak quarter (see Table 4.1-11). Therefore, impacts would be considered significant, but as shown below, mitigable. Emissions within Santa Barbara County are also shown in Table 4.1-11. However, the SBCAPCD does not have thresholds for construction, except the offset threshold of 25 tons per year. This level would not be exceeded for any pollutant within Santa Barbara County. If contaminated soils would need to be hauled to Buttonwillow, these truck trips could add to the emissions totals. These values are included in the peak day and peak quarter estimates in Table 4.1-11. See Appendix B (section Off-site Emissions by Activity) for detailed calculations. Mitigation measures that could be implemented to reduce the emissions would include measures such as cleaner construction equipment diesel engines, the use of recent model year trucks and obtaining off-site reductions. Mitigation Measures AQ-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, and throughout project construction, as applicable, the Applicant shall implement the following construction emission reduction measures: a. Properly maintain all construction equipment according to manufacturer’s specifications; b. Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment with CARB-certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road); c. Use CARB Tier 3 certified diesel construction equipment or cleaner off-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with state Off-Road Regulations; d. Use CARB 2007 or cleaner certified on-road heavy-duty diesel trucks and comply with state On-Road Regulations; e. If construction or trucking companies that are awarded the bid or are subcontractors for the project do not have equipment to meet the above two measures, the impacts from the dirtier equipment shall be addressed through SLOAPCD approved off-site or other mitigation measures; f. All on- and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5 minute idling limit; g. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies (Sensitive receptors are defined in the SLOAPCD Handbook as people that have an increased sensitivity to air 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include schools, parks and playgrounds, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential dwelling units. No staging, queuing or idling within 1000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; h. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies; No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use. i. Equipment shall be electrified when feasible; j. Substitute gasoline-powered or diesel hybrids in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible; and k. Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane, or biodiesel. AQ-1b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure SLOAPCD regulations that prohibit developmental burning of vegetative material within San Luis Obispo County are followed. AQ-1c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that portable equipment and engines 50 horsepower or greater, used during grading and construction activities must have a California portable equipment registration (issued by the ARB) or an SLOAPCD permit. Proof of registration must be provided to the SLOAPCD prior to the start of grading or construction or a permit secured from the SLOAPCD prior to the start of grading or construction. The following list is as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements, but it is not exclusive: a. Power screens, conveyors, diesel engines, and/or crushers; b. Portable generators and equipment with 50-horsepower or greater engines; c. Internal combustion engines; d. Unconfined abrasive blasting operations; e. Concrete batch plants; f. Rock and pavement crushing; g. Tub grinders; and h. Trommel screens. AQ-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain the required SLOAPCD permits for the hydrocarbon contaminated soil. In addition, the following measures shall be implemented unless otherwise directed by the SLOAPCD upon a finding that alternative measures will result in equal or greater reduction in emission of air contaminants.: 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR a. Covers on storage piles shall be maintained in place at all times in areas not actively involved in soil addition or removal; b. Contaminated soil shall be covered with at least six inches of packed uncontaminated soil or other TPH –non-permeable barrier such as plastic tarp, or other methods as approved by the SLOCAPCD. No headspace shall be allowed where vapors could accumulate; c. Covered piles shall be designed in such a way to eliminate erosion due to wind or water. No openings in the covers are permitted; d. The air quality impacts from the excavation and haul trips associated with removing the contaminated soil must be evaluated, with emissions estimates provided to the SLOAPCD and mitigated with low emission trucks, low emission construction equipment and/or offsets if needed, if total emissions exceed the SLOAPCD’s construction phase thresholds. An estimate of these emissions is included in this EIR; e. During soil excavation, odors shall not be evident to such a degree as to cause a public nuisance, or violation of SLOAPCD regulations would result; f. Clean soil must be segregated from contaminated soil; and g. The permit shall specify applicable criteria established by SLOAPCD. The notification and permitting determination requirements shall be directed to the SLOAPCD Engineering Division. AQ-1e Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, or during construction, if emissions of ROG+NOx with the above mitigations still exceed the thresholds, the Applicant shall secure SLOAPCD-approved off-site reductions in ROG + NOx emissions to ensure that ROG + NOx emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD quarterly thresholds. Coordination with the SLOAPCD should begin at least six (6) months prior to issuance of grading permits for the Project to allow time for refining calculations and for the SLOAPCD to review and approve the CAMP and off-site mitigation approach. AQ-1f Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that all grading and construction equipment greater than 100 bhp be equipped with CARB Level 3 diesel particulate filters (DPF), or equivalent, to achieve an 85 percent reduction in diesel particulate emissions. If CARB verified Level 3 DPFs cannot be secured for all of the equipment greater than 100 hp then the applicant will work to offset the added DPM with measures including but not limited to schedule modifications, implementation of no idling requirement, and expanded implementation of AQ-1a measures "i", "j", and "k"(e.g. use of alternative fueled generators). AQ-1g Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall produce a schedule detailing the phasing of activities for each OU and ensuring that the emissions of diesel particulate in any quarter falls below the applicable SLOAPCD thresholds. This could include measures such as ensuring that Reservoir 5 Cap, Reservoir 7 Cap and North Marsh remediation do not coincide. As an alternative approach, if scheduling is not feasible, the Applicant shall provide SLOAPCD-approved off-site 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR reductions in DPM emissions to ensure that DPM emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds. Residual Impacts Emissions after implementation of the mitigation measures listed above are shown in Table 4.1- 12. Details of the calculations are shown in Appendix B (see sections Mitigated On-site Construction Equipment Emissions Calculations by Activity, Mitigated Off-site Emissions by Activity and Mitigated On-site Fugitive Dust Emissions). The mitigation measures were included in the spreadsheets and the emission factors (for example, Tier 3 engines utilized a lower emission factor; application of DPF reduced DPM emissions by 85 percent, etc). Table 4.1-12 Remediation Emissions Mitigated PEAK DAY (lbs/day) ROG + NOx Diesel PM SLO County 552.3 5.7 Thresholds 137.0 7.0 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes No SB County 20.4 0.3 Combined SLOC & SBC 566.9 6.0 PEAK QUARTER (tons/qrtr) ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust SLO County 17.4 0.2 6.3 Thresholds 2.5 0.1 2.5 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes SB County 0.6 0.002 - Combined SLOC & SBC 17.9 0.2 6.3 Note: Santa Barbara County does not have a peak day or quarter threshold for construction emissions. Assumes use of all 2007 model year or newer trucks. Without 2007 model year trucks, emissions of DPM would increase by 8 lbs/day. Peak days occur at different times in SBC and SLO County. Therefore, Combined is not an addition of the individual peaks in the above table. Appendix B provides an introductory section on the calculation methodologies and inputs to the calculations. Emissions with on-site measures only; but would be less than the thresholds with off-site mitigation obtained through the SLOAPCD. Implementation of the mitigation measures would reduce ROG + NOx emissions. However, the emissions of ROG + NOx would remain above the significance thresholds. Implementation of mitigation measure AQ-1a requires entering into an off-site mitigation agreement with SLOAPCD relative to the ROG + NOx exceedance. This will reduce these impacts to below the thresholds. For off-site mitigations (AQ-1a), the Applicant will be required by the SLOAPCD to complete a Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP). This document shall include Project specific information (i.e., actual fleet make-up, emissions level, and schedule) that will allow for more refined project emissions to be determined. If, after the standard and BACT mitigation measures are factored into the refined emission estimation, the Project still exceeds the Tier 2 threshold, then SLOAPCD approved off-site mitigation would be necessary. Coordination with the 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR SLOAPCD should begin at least six months prior to issuance of grading permits for the Project to allow time for refining calculations and for the SLOAPCD to review and approve the CAMP and off-site mitigation approach. The Applicant may use funding defined for off-site mitigation to implement SLOAPCD- approved ROG + NOx emission reduction projects, or they may pay the off-site mitigation for projects plus an administration fee of 15% to the SLOAPCD to administer emission reduction projects. The Applicant shall provide this funding at least two months prior to the start of construction to help facilitate emission offsets that are as real-time as possible. If possible, the phase impacts should be addressed through one transaction. Mitigation measures associated with diesel particulate catalysts and impact AQ.1, including the use of 2007 model year trucks, would reduce the emissions levels of diesel particulate, but would remain slightly above the thresholds for the peak quarter. However, the availability of only 2007 model year or newer trucks is uncertain at this time, although it is anticipated that they would become more readily available at the time of the project construction. Phasing of the project affects peak quarter and daily emissions as multiple areas could be undergoing construction at the same time. Advanced planning of construction activities to minimize peak quarter diesel particulate emissions could reduce the emissions (for example, planning any Buttonwillow contaminated soil trips for when other truck trips are not occurring, etc). In combination, these measures would reduce impacts to below the SLOAPCD thresholds. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.2 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate fugitive dust that exceeds SLOAPCD thresholds. Remediation Class II During construction, a large portion of PM10 emissions typically arises from large pieces of equipment and vehicles traveling on disturbed soil, unpaved surfaces, and various earth-moving activities, such as grading and clearing. These emissions are known as “fugitive dust” and depend heavily on the size of the graded area, the volume of soil moved, the number of vehicles and construction machinery required, the duration of construction and the soil conditions (i.e., level of moisture, soil type). The fugitive PM10 emissions are estimated based on a disturbed area as provided by the Applicant. Multiple activities would involve the disturbance of more than 4 acres, including the flower mound, OU#3 grading, OU#4 North Marsh and borrow area 2. Emission factors were used from the CalEEMod model for soil moving and from EPA AP-42 for industrial roads utilizing average soil silt content. Fugitive dust would also be generated from soil dumping operations associated with cap construction and borrow sites. The borrow sites are specifically addressed under the crushing operations, including the Flower Mound borrow area and the borrow areas 2 and 3 activity assessments (see above). Fugitive dust emissions 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR associated with the use of demolition charges and blasting at the Flower Mound are addressed under fugitive dust emissions generated from demolition activities. Naturally-occurring asbestos could also be present in the soils and could cause impacts as it would be associated with the generation of fugitive dust from activities, including Flower Mound area blasting and crushing activities. A geologic study performed by the Applicant (Padre 2012) examined the prevalence of naturally occurring asbestos at the site. Asbestos was not indicated above the analytical detection limit of 0.25% in any of the rock or soil samples. However, the microscopic analyses indicated that several rock core samples contained trace concentrations of chrysotile (serpentinite) asbestos but could not be quantified due to the method quantification criteria. The findings of the microscopic analyses and field observations would be utilized in the development of a dust mitigation plan associated with proposed future grading activities at the Project Site and compliance and consultation with SLOAPCD requirements, including Asbestos NOA ATCM, a Work Plan, Asbestos Dust Control Plan and Health and Safety Plan. SLOAPCD Emissions of fugitive dust exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds for fugitive dust during the peak quarter (see Table 4.1-11). Therefore, impacts would be considered significant. Mitigation measures that could be implemented to reduce the emissions would include measures to reduce fugitive dust (i.e., watering). Mitigation Measures AQ-2a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall provide satisfactory evidence that a SLOAPCD-approved Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) has been prepared that addresses fugitive dust emissions. The Plan shall include requirements in the SLOAPCD CEQA Handbook. Fugitive dust mitigation measures in the plan shall include a combination of the following, as approved by the SLOAPCD: a. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. b. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. An adequate water supply source must be identified. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. c. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed, covered, or a SLOAPCD- approved alternative method will be used. (90 percent reduction). d. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved Project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. e. Exposed ground areas that will be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast-germinating non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established, unless other dust and erosion control measures are specified in the agency-approved Dust Control Plan. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-37 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR f. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD. g. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. h. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. i. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. j. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible l. Apply water every 3 hours to disturbed areas within the construction site (61 percent reduction in particulate emissions). m. Application of soil binders to dirt roads shall be applied to achieve at least an 80 percent reduction in fugitive dust emissions. All soil binders used shall be environmentally friendly’ and shall be either lignosulfonate- or calcium lignosulfonate-based approved by the SLOAPCD. All dust control methods, including soil binders, shall be demonstrated in the fugitive dust control plan to ensure compliance with SLOAPCD Rule 401. n. All roadway, driveway, and sidewalk paving should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. o. The contractor or builder shall designate a person to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and oversee mitigation measure implementation as per SLOAPCD approval to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions to less than 20 percent opacity, and to prevent transport of dust off-site. The designated monitor shall carry out these duties on regular workdays, as well as holidays and weekends when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of the designated monitor shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or demolition. AQ-2b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit an APCD approved Construction Activity Monitoring Plan (CAMP), which shall include, but not be limited to the following elements: a. A Dust Control Management Plan that encompasses all, but is not limited to, measures associated with impact AQ.1 and AQ.2; 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR b. Tabulation of on- and off-road construction equipment information (e.g., make, model, type, engine tier, DPM Level 3 filter age, horse-power, and miles or hours of operation); c. Construction truck trips scheduled during non-peak hours to reduce peak-hour emissions; d. Limited construction work-day period, if necessary; and e. Phase construction activities, if appropriate. AQ-2c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle-restricting measures for both on- and off-road equipment during the Project grading and construction phase near sensitive receptors: a. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies. No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; b. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies. No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; c. Use alternative fueled equipment whenever possible; and d. Signs identifying the no idling requirements must be posted and enforced at the construction site. AQ-2d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle-restricting measures for on-road vehicles during the grading and construction phase of the Project: a. Section 2485 of Title 13, the California Code of Regulations limits diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles that operate in the State of California with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds and licensed for operation on highways. It applies to California and non-California based vehicles. In general, the regulation specifies that drivers of these vehicles: Shall not idle the vehicle’s primary diesel engine for more than 5 minutes at any location, except as noted in Subsection (d) of the regulation; and, Shall not operate a diesel-fueled auxiliary power system (APS) to power a heater, air conditioner, or any ancillary equipment on that vehicle during sleeping or resting in a sleeper berth for greater than 5 minutes at any location when within 100 feet of a restricted area, except as noted in Subsection (d) of the regulation. b. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind on- road equipment operators of the 5-minute idling limit. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-39 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR AQ-2e Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle restricting measures for off-road vehicles during the construction phase of the Project: a. Off-road diesel equipment shall comply with the 5-minute idling restriction identified in Section 2449(d)(3) of the CARB In-Use off-Road Diesel regulation: www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/ordiesl07/frooal.pdf. b. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind off- road equipment operators of the 5-minute idling limit. AQ-2f Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit a geologic evaluation under the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, to determine if Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) is present within the area that will be disturbed. NOA has been identified as a toxic air contaminant by the CARB. If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site, the Applicant must 1) comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the SLOAPCD; 2) require that any crushing operations do not result in any dust that is visible crossing the property line, does not discharge into the air any visible emissions other than uncombined water vapor, for a period aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour which are 50 percent as dark or darker in shade as that designated as number one on the Ringlemann Chart or exceed at 10 % opacity; and 3) conduct a geological evaluation prior to any grading. Technical Appendix 4.4 of the SLOAPCD CEQA Handbook includes a map of zones throughout the County where NOA has been found. More information on NOA is available at http://www.slocleanair.org/business/asbestos.php. AQ-2g Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the Applicant shall comply with asbestos containing material (ACM) requirements. Demolition activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues surrounding proper handling, demolition, and disposal of ACM. ACM could be encountered during demolition or remodeling of existing buildings. Asbestos can also be found in utility pipes and pipelines (transite pipes or insulation on pipes). If utility pipelines are scheduled for removal or relocation or a building(s) is proposed to be removed or renovated, various regulatory requirements may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M - asbestos NESHAP). These requirements include but are not limited to: (1) notification to the SLOAPCD; (2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified Asbestos Inspector; and (3) applicable removal and disposal requirements of identified ACM. More information on asbestos is available at http://www.slocleanair.org/business/asbestos.php. Residual Impact Implementation of the fugitive dust measures would reduce fugitive dust emissions during the peak quarter by 55 percent (Table 4.1-11 to Table 4.1-12). See details in Appendix B (see section Mitigated On-site Fugitive Dust Emissions). Fugitive dust emission mitigation measures were 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR calculated by incorporating the reduction percentages into the spreadsheets. The use of fugitive dust control measures, such as watering, would also help to control emissions of NOA. Additional measures for NOA that would be addressed in the required Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan (if NOA is determined to be present), could include: Visible dust limits; Storage pile moisture or coverings; Vehicle speed limits of 15 mph; Water of disturbed areas and roadways; Limits on activities during high winds; Surface treatment; Track-out measures; Appointment of a dust control supervisor; and Air monitoring requirements. Mitigation measure AQ-2a would limit offsite dust to a 20 percent opacity, as per SLOCAPCD Rule 401, which would limit offsite impacts. As per the SLOCAPCD Handbook, exceedances of the 2.5 ton/qtr threshold requires fugitive PM10 mitigation measures and would require the implementation of a CAMP. As per the Guidelines, all fugitive dust sources shall be managed to ensure that dust emissions are adequately controlled to below the 20% opacity limit identified in the APCD Rule 401 Visible Emissions and to ensure that dust is not emitted offsite. With the implementation of a CAMP, fugitive dust emissions would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.3 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate GHG emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Remediation Class III Air emissions of GHG pollutants (CO2, N2, and CH4) during construction would be associated with construction equipment at the Project Site and the use of off-site vehicles for transporting materials, equipment, and personnel. As per SLOAPCD guidelines, GHG emissions associated with construction are amortized over 25 years. Total GHG emissions associated with remediation would be 7,839 metric tons of CO2e, with an amortized (over 25 years) value of 314 metric tons per year. Please see Appendix B (sections Proposed Project Emissions Summary, On-site Construction Equipment Emissions Calculations by Activity and Off-site Emissions by Activity) for the detailed calculations by pollutant (CO2, CH4 and N2O). This would be less than the significance thresholds and would constitute a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impact The residual impact would be less than significant (Class III). 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-41 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.4 Construction activities associated with remediation would generate toxic emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds for impacts to sensitive receptors. Remediation Class II Emissions associated with the remediation construction would generate toxic emissions, primarily due to the use of construction equipment diesel engines. Diesel engines would emit diesel particulate matter, which is defined by the CARB as a carcinogen. Impacts of construction equipment diesel engine use were estimated by utilizing the construction equipment emissions as calculated above) and construction schedules. Diesel particulate emissions may take place within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors. Toxic emissions from pipeline removal would be minimal as most of the lighter hydrocarbons are no longer present and would therefore not produce off-site toxic impacts. Diesel trucks would also be traveling to and from the Project Site to bring in and remove materials. These trucks would travel along area roadways, would emit diesel particulate matter in these areas, and could increase toxic impacts in these areas. Truck levels associated with remediation could exceed 100 trucks per day, but would only occur above these levels for a period of four months during the Operable Unit (OU) #2 Reservoir cap and North Marsh remediation periods. Impacts to sensitive receptors shall be minimized by requiring the use of cleaner equipment, which shall include diesel particulate filters on the larger horse powered equipment (as per mitigation measures associated with impacts AQ.1 and AQ.2) and use of alternatively powered equipment (as per AQ-1f). Mitigation Measures Implement mitigation measures AQ-1a through AQ-1g, and AQ-2a through AQ-2g. Residual Impacts CARB level 3 diesel particulate catalysts are readily available and over 40 models have been verified by the CARB. With construction phase DPM mitigation managed through the Construction Activity Management Plan, short term DPM impacts are considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.1.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The City Development Plan would generate emissions from construction of the various land uses and from the operations associated with those land uses. Emissions of both criteria pollutants and GHG would occur. Emissions of odors associated with the City Development Plan are not anticipated. Emissions of CO would not occur in confined spaces or exceed the CO threshold of 550 lbs per day. Therefore, as per the SLOAPCD CEQA Air Quality handbook, CO modeling has not been conducted. Each of these impacts is discussed below. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-42 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.5 Construction activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development Class III Emissions associated with the construction of development scenarios would generate emissions due to construction equipment engines, fugitive dust, worker vehicles, and delivery of materials and equipment. Construction would occur associated with each of the five phases of construction and would occur every five years associated with the phases of development. Emissions were estimated utilizing the CalEEMod modeling software utilizing the development land uses associated with each phase. Construction equipment load factors were updated, as per the SLOAPCD CalEEMod guidance, to coordinate with the Carl Moyer Program Guidelines adopted in 2011. Equipment horsepower and daily usage were assigned the CalEEMod defaults. Emissions associated with construction for each phase of the Project are shown in Table 4.1-13. Table 4.1-13 City Development Plan Construction Emissions by Phase PEAK DAY (lbs/day) ROG + NOx Diesel PM Phase 1 – 2015 170.61 2.55 Phase 2 – 2020 228.32 1.5 Phase 3 – 2025 147.22 0.85 Phase 4 – 2030 195.49 0.55 Phase 5 – 2035 391.96 0.37 Thresholds 137 7.0 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes No PEAK QUARTER (tons/qrtr) Phase ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust Phase 1 – 2015 1.74 0.06 1.01 Phase 2 – 2020 1.25 0.03 0.97 Phase 3 – 2025 0.66 0.01 0.06 Phase 4 – 2030 0.81 0.01 0.97 Phase 5 – 2035 1.33 0.01 1.00 Thresholds 2.50 0.13 2.50 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No Note: Tons per quarter are derived from the CalEEMod annual emissions. Peak day used the winter emissions as they are higher than the summer CalEEMod estimates. Appendix B provides an introductory section on the calculation methodologies and inputs to the calculations. Emissions exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds for the peak day ROG+NOx emission levels. However, as the construction activity would last for more than 90 days (anticipated lasting for 2- 3 years), the daily thresholds would not apply (as per the SLOAPCD Handbook). All other thresholds would not be exceeded by the development phase construction activities. Therefore, impacts for ROG+NOx would be considered less than significant. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-43 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures Fugitive dust mitigation measures (see impact AQ.2) would be applicable to this phase of the Project as per SLOAPCD requirements and are included in the mitigation monitoring table at the end of this section. Residual Impacts Impacts would remain less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.6 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate ROG+NOx emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development Class II Emissions associated with the operational phases of City Development Plan would generate emissions due to activities at each site that would be a function of land use, employee vehicles, and delivery of materials to each site. Operations would occur associated with each of the five phases of development and would increase cumulatively every five years associated with the five phases of development. Emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod modeling program for each phase along with the associated land uses defined in Chapter 2.0, Project Description. Each phase and land use were entered into the CalEEMod program along with estimated parking lot areas (using the “other asphalt surface” designation). Inputs were utilized as described in the SLOAPCD CalEEMod information sheet. Most other inputs utilized the CalEEMod defaults. Emissions associated with each phase of the City Development Plan are tabulated individually and are shown in Table 4.1-14. Additional emissions would occur during each phase of the City Development Plan until final build-out in 2040, which are also shown in Table 4.1-14. Table 4.1-14 City Development Plan Operational Emissions by Phase PEAK DAY (lbs/day) Phase ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust CO Phase 1 – 2020 32.92 0.75 23.75 85.06 Phase 2 – 2025 20.28 0.45 14.41 44.94 Phase 3 – 2030 11.07 0.27 9.15 22.62 Phase 4 – 2035 30.33 0.68 21.38 78.35 Phase 5 – 2040 36.16 0.60 18.31 76.60 Phase 1 & 2 in 2025 41.22 0.91 29.38 91.27 Phases 1, 2 & 3 in 2030 46.64 1.14 38.53 95.53 Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4 in 2035 88.36 1.71 52.47 213.4 All Phases Combined in 2040 79.46 2.06 70.72 141.7 Thresholds 25 1.25 25 550 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes No 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-44 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.1-14 City Development Plan Operational Emissions by Phase PEAK YEAR (tons/year) Phase ROG + NOx Fugitive Dust Phase 1 – 2020 4.78 2.95 Phase 2 – 2025 3.06 1.78 Phase 3 – 2030 1.66 1.11 Phase 4 – 2035 4.55 2.76 Phase 5 – 2040 5.60 2.33 Phase 1 & 2 in 2025 6.22 3.63 Phases 1, 2 &3 in 2030 7.14 4.74 Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4 in 2035 13.15 6.51 All Phases Combined in 2040 12.59 8.84 Thresholds 25 25 Exceeds Thresholds? No No Note: Peak day used the winter emissions as they are higher than the summer CalEEMod estimates. CalEEMod demonstrates a substantial reduction in mobile emissions from 2035 to 2040, with the year 2040 aligning with the EMFAC2011 emissions more accurately than 2035 CalEEMod results. This is partly due to the CalEEMod use of the EMFAC2007 model instead of EMFAC2011 and is anticipated that this will be corrected in future versions of CalEEMod. Appendix B provides an introductory section on the calculation methodologies and inputs to the calculations. SLOAPCD ROG+NOx emissions would exceed the operational thresholds for the daily thresholds except the CO threshold, and therefore would be considered significant. Emissions would not exceed any of the annual thresholds. The City Development Plan, by design, addresses a number of operational measures that could reduce emissions including in-fill development, development within ¼ mile of public transit connections, the use of bike paths, etc. Although the City Development Plan does not include residential development, some measures could be applied to reduce energy use, and thereby, reduce emissions. Title 24, for example, is applicable to all occupied buildings in California. Some measures related to LEED requirements could reduce energy use of the proposed land uses. However, the majority of emissions are associated with on-road vehicle traffic. Fugitive dust, for example, is entirely associated with on-road vehicle traffic, and 85 percent of NOx emissions are generated by on-road vehicles. As on-road vehicles are regulated by the CARB and existing regulations are in place to reduce these emissions in the coming years (Pavley, for example), there are minimal mitigation measures that could be applied to the operational phase of the Project to reduce criteria emissions, although some measures can be applied to reduce vehicle trips. Based upon the trip generation estimates for the commercial component of the Project, much of the parking facilities would go unused during non-peak time of the weekdays and could be used by daily commuters as a park and ride location. Mitigation Measures AQ-6a Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce area source emissions, where applicable. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-45 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR a. Increase walls and attic insulation by 20 percent above what is required by the 2008 Title 24 requirements. b. Shade tree planting along southern exposures of buildings to reduce summer cooling needs. c. Shade tree planting in parking lots to reduce evaporative emissions from parked vehicles. d. Use built-in energy efficient appliances, were applicable. e. Orient buildings toward streets with convenient pedestrian and transit access. f. Use double-paned windows. g. Use sodium low-energy parking lot and streetlights. (e.g., sodium) h. Use energy efficient interior lighting. i. Incorporate energy efficient skylights into roof plan (i.e., should meet the EPA/DOE Energy Star® rating). j. Install High efficiency or gas space heating. k. Install door sweeps and weather stripping if more efficient doors and windows are not available. AQ-6b Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits or lease agreement, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce vehicle emissions. a. Locate electrical vehicle charging station(s) in the parking lots at a ratio required by County or City ordinance or as recommended by APCD. b. In coordination with the City Transit Management, provide transit demand enhancements (i.e., additional stops, shelters, phones) within the Project impact area to meet the increased ridership demand associated with the Project. c. Provide on-site long-and short-term bicycle parking consistent with location and design criteria established by the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan, with installation and design guidance provided by the City’s Community Design Guidelines. One bicycle parking space for every 10 employees is considered appropriate. d. Provide shower stalls and locker facilities to encourage employees to bike or walk to work. e. The Applicant or lessee shall meet with SLOCOG’s Rideshare Program Coordinator to develop a Trip Reduction Plan to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director and APCD. The Trip Reduction Plan shall include the following: 1) A comprehensive Transportation Demand Management program for employees. The TDM may include: (a) private vanpool operation; (b) transit and vanpool fare subsidies; (c) pay parking for employees; (d) provision of subscription bus services; (e) alternative work hours; (f) capital improvements for transit services; (g) reduction of parking fees for carpools 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-46 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR and vanpools; (h) Bikeway linkages to established bicycle routes; and (i) provision of an on-site employee transportation and rideshare coordinator. 2) Preferential carpool and vanpool parking for employees. 3) A lunch-time shuttle to reduce single occupant vehicle trips. 4) On-site facilities for eating and convenience including refrigeration, automatic banking, and other vending for employees. 5) Incentive programs, similar to the County Rideshare Transportation Choices Program, to reduce employee commute trips. Programs should be coordinated with adjacent commercial development with a goal to achieve an Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) of 1.20 persons per vehicle or greater. 6) The Applicant shall set aside funds equivalent to three month enrollment in Rideshare’s Back ‘N’ Forth Club for 25 percent of all employees (a maximum of $52,230 for this project). This fund shall be managed by APCD through a program similar to the “Flash Pass” used for the San Luis Obispo Home Depot development. If funds are not used for this purpose, they may be used for other incentives that have been included in the approved Trip Reduction Plan. f. The Applicant shall coordinate with the City and APCD to pursue a shared use agreement to use over-supplied parking areas for a potential park-and-ride lot. The park-and-ride lot should be away from building entrances and as close as possible to the parking lot entrance nearest to Tank Farm Road or fronting street. The target number of park-and-ride spaces should be 25. The parking area should be identified with signage and registered with the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments as an official park-and-ride lot. g. Implement on-site circulation design elements in parking lots to reduce vehicle queuing and improve the pedestrian and bicycle environment. AQ-6c Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, if emissions of ROG+NOx with the above mitigations still exceed the thresholds, the Applicant shall secure SLOAPCD approved off-site reductions in ROG+NOx emissions from the SLOAPCD to ensure that ROG+NOx emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD daily and annual thresholds. AQ-6d Implement a program of periodic wet-vacuum street sweeping in coordination with APCD in order to reduce vehicle-related fugitive dust emissions. Residual Impacts CalEEMod includes the reductions in emissions associated with the use of newer automobiles and trucks over time, as by the completion of Phase 5 in 2040, automobiles and trucks would be emitting substantially fewer emissions on a per mile basis than the current fleet of trucks and automobiles. The CalEEMod model was run with project design features and mitigation measures implemented for traffic mitigation as per the CAPCOA “Quantifying GHG Mitigation Measures” and as discussed in the CalEEMod User Guide. These include: 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-47 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Increased transit accessibility – distance to transit station 0.25 miles (CAPCOA LUT-5 estimates that transit use/share would increase by about 25%); Improved pedestrian network (CAPCOA SDT-1 produces about a 1% reduction in VMT for Project Site improvements); Trip reduction program with 25% employee eligibility (CAPCOA TRT-1 produces up to a 6% reduction in voluntary employee vehicle trips); Ridesharing programs with 25% employee eligibility (CAPCOA TRT-3 about a 4% reduction in vehicles miles in an urban area) Transit subsidies with 25% employee eligibility (CAPCOA TRT-4 produces about a 6% reduction in vehicles miles with a $0.75 daily subsidy in an urban setting). These measures would reduce emissions of ROG+NOx by about 6 percent as per the CalEEMod modeling runs (see Table 4.1-15). By requiring the Applicant to obtain off-site ROG+NOx emission reductions, emissions of ROG+NOx could be reduced to below the daily thresholds. Impacts would therefore be less than significant with mitigation (Class II) for ROG+NOx emissions. Table 4.1-15 City Development Plan Operational Emissions by Phase - Mitigated PEAK DAY (lbs/day) Phase ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust CO Phase 1 – 2020 29.2 0.63 19.7 73.62 Phase 2 – 2025 18.53 0.38 11.95 39.54 Phase 3 – 2030 10.19 0.23 7.59 19.83 Phase 4 – 2035 26.98 0.57 17.74 68.06 Phase 5 – 2040 33.07 0.51 15.19 67.62 Phase 1 & 2 in 2025 37.66 0.77 24.37 80.27 Phases 1, 2 & 3 in 2030 42.96 0.96 31.96 83.77 Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4 in 2035 80.03 1.44 43.52 188.12 All Phases Combined in 2040 74.02 1.74 58.66 124 Thresholds 25 1.25 25 550 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes No PEAK YEAR (tons/year) Phase ROG + NOx Fugitive Dust Phase 1 – 2020 4.28 2.45 Phase 2 – 2025 2.82 1.48 Phase 3 – 2030 1.56 0.92 Phase 4 – 2035 4.09 2.29 Phase 5 – 2040 5.17 1.93 Phase 1 & 2 in 2025 6.22 3.63 Phases 1, 2 &3 in 2030 7.14 4.74 Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4 in 2035 13.15 6.51 All Phases Combined in 2040 11.8 7.29 Thresholds 25 25 Exceeds Thresholds? No No Note: Appendix B provides an introductory section on the calculation methodologies and inputs to the calculations. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-48 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.7 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate diesel particulate and fugitive dust emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development Class I Emissions associated with the operational phases of City Development Plan would generate diesel particulate and fugitive dust emissions due to activities at each site that would be a function of land use, employee vehicles, and delivery of materials to each site. Operations would occur associated with each of the five phases of development and would increase cumulatively every five years associated with the five phases of development. Emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod modeling program for each phase along with the associated land uses defined in Chapter 2.0, Project Description. Each phase and land use was entered into the CalEEMod program. Inputs were utilized as described in the SLOAPCD CalEEMod information sheet. Most other inputs utilized the CalEEMod defaults. Emissions associated with each phase of the City Development Plan are tabulated individually and are shown in Table 4.1-14 and 4.1.15. Additional emissions would occur cumulatively during each phase of the City Development Plan until final build-out in 2040, which is also shown in Table 4.1-14 and 4.1.15. Diesel particulate and fugitive dust emissions would exceed the operational thresholds for the daily thresholds (Diesel PM by 2035 and fugitive dust by 2025). Emissions would not exceed any of the annual thresholds. Mitigation Measures See mitigation measure AQ-6b Residual Impacts CalEEMod includes the reductions in emissions associated with the use of newer diesel automobiles and diesel trucks over time, as by the completion of Phase 5 in 2040, automobiles and trucks would be emitting substantially fewer diesel emissions on a per mile basis than the current fleet of trucks and automobiles. However, at full build-out, the project would generate over 1,300 diesel truck trips per day. Even with the use of cleaner vehicles over time (as estimated by CalEEMod in the year 2040), the emissions of diesel particulate matter and fugitive dust would remain above the thresholds. This would be a significant and unavoidable (Class I) impact. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-49 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.8 Operational and construction activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate GHG emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Development Class II Emissions associated with the construction and operational phases of development scenarios would generate GHG emissions due to activities at each site that would be a function of construction equipment use, land use, employee and worker vehicles, equipment and material delivery, electrical use, as well as water and solid waste generation. CalEEMod was used to estimate the GHG emissions associated with the development construction and operational phases of the Project. Construction emissions were calculated for each construction phase and then amortized over 25 years, as per SLOAPCD requirements. CalEEMod estimates GHG emissions associate with biogenic and non-biogenic CO2, CH4, and N2O. Total CO2 equivalent emissions are then estimated within the CalEEMod program in metric tons. Emissions of GHG are summarized in Table 4.1-16. See Appendix B, sections CalEEMod: Summaries and CalEEMod: Development All Phases Annual in 2040 including Mitigations. Table 4.1-16 City Development Plan Operational GHG Emissions by Phase Peak Year for each Development Phase Metric Tons CO2e Phase 1 – 2020 6,046 Phase 2 – 2025 4,783 Phase 3 – 2030 2,430 Phase 4 – 2035 6,935 Phase 5 – 2040 4,257 Phase 1 & 2 in 2025 6,879 Phases 1, 2 &3 in 2030 12,403 Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4 in 2035 18,940 All Phases Combined in 2040 (GHG per SP) 22,543 (12.5) Thresholds 1,150 (4.9) Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Note: includes construction emissions amortized over 25 years. Service population based on employees and land use category. Appendix B provides an introductory section on the calculation methodologies and inputs to the calculations. GHG emissions would be attributable to energy consumption (21 percent), mobile sources (23 percent), waste production and treatment creating non-biogenic and biogenic CO2 and methane 34 percent), water consumption (17 percent) and construction (1 percent). GHG emissions would exceed the SLOAPCD threshold of 1,150 metric tonnes per year. Mitigation measures would include those associated with impact AQ.6 (off-site mobile reductions), in addition to the requirement for the use of higher efficiency buildings and, if emissions continue to exceed the thresholds, working with the SLOCAPCD to secure GHG emissions reductions. Similar to the SLOAPCD ROG+NOx program, the GHG program is 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-50 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR administered by the SLOAPCD and funds programs in the community which reduce GHG emissions. Mitigation Measures See mitigation measures AQ-6a and b AQ-8 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits for each phase, the Applicant shall include building efficiency improvements with construction permit applications and/or secure SLOAPCD approved off-site reductions in GHG emissions to ensure that GHG emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds. Residual Impacts Implementation of mitigation measures from other impact areas and implementation of building energy efficiency improvements (exceeding Title 24 by 10 percent, reducing lighting energy use by 10 percent) would reduce GHG emissions by about 5 percent as per the CalEEMod program although the CalEEMod program does not incorporate all of the measures into the model - see Appendix B sections CalEEMod: summaries and CalEEMod: Development All Phases Annual in 2040). Increasing building efficiency, as well as implementing and funding APCD approved programs, would ensure GHG emissions are reduced below SLOAPCD GHG thresholds, and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.9 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate CO emissions that produce localized CO Hot Spots. Development Class III Increased trips associated with the vehicles at area intersections would emit CO emissions that could cause localized concentrations of CO to exceed the air standards. Although the area is in attainment for CO, the addition of over 8,000 vehicles per day onto area roadways could still produce localized impacts. An assessment was conducted utilizing the CALINE4 model at all intersections that would exceed an LOS D during the build-out plus Project phase (please see section 4.3, Transportation and Circulation). The Protocol for CO assessments (ITS 1997) was followed. Eleven intersections were assessed and the greatest increase in CO emissions would be less than 1 ppm. The CO levels ranged from 4.0 ppm to 5.0 ppm 1-hour results and from 3.4 to 4.0 ppm for the 8-hour results. These levels are below the standards of 20 ppm and 9 ppm for the 1-hour and 8-hour respectively. CALINE output files are included in Appendix B. Impacts would therefore be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impact The residual impact would be less than significant (Class III). 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-51 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.10 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate diesel PM emissions that produce localized, elevated cancer impacts. Development Class III Increased trips associated with the City Development Plan (a Type A Project under the SLOAPCD guidelines) would increase diesel particulate emissions (DPM) associated with diesel trucks near area intersections and roadways that could cause localized concentrations of DPM to elevate cancer risks. The City Development Plan would generate over 1,300 trucks per day on area roadways, with over 300 daily trips of heavy trucks. The diesel emissions from these trucks and their impacts were assessed using EMFAC2011 and AERMOD modeling of the intersections and roadways with highest levels of Project truck trips (Tank Farm Road/Broad Street and Tank Farm Road/Higuera Road). The AERMOD model was set up with volume sources aligned with each roadway at roadway speeds, volume sources associated with intersection approaches (lower speeds) and intersection truck idling incorporating intersection delay times. A receptor grid at 25 meter spacing was used to define receptors outside of 30 meters from the roadway centerline to a distance of 1,000 meters. Diesel truck daily trip rates were input for all intersection branches and for roadways within 1,000 meters of the intersections. Both heavy diesel trucks and medium diesel trucks were incorporated into the modeling to define emission rates. The EMFAC2011 model (for model year 2015) was used to define truck emission rates at different speeds and at idle. AERMOD input and output files are included in Appendix B (the AERMOD Diesel Truck Emissions at Intersections/Roadways section). Evaluation of roadway segments and intersections found that the City Development Plan resulted in a highest cancer risk of 5.8 cancer cases per million located immediately adjacent to the Tank Farm Road and Higuera Street intersection, which would be below the SLOAPCD significance criteria. Impacts would therefore be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impact The residual impact would be less than significant (Class III). 4.1.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impacts from the County Development Plan would be the same as the impacts from the City Development Plan as the phasing, construction requirements, and land use mix would be the same. The differences between the two projects would be that the business park and service commercial developments would be located on slightly smaller acreages (but with the same square footages), and there would be the construction and operation of a wastewater treatment plant. Emissions would be slightly higher during the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) construction (constructed in Phase 1), but would be lower in Phase 5 as a smaller acreage (not square footage) would be developed. Energy use of the WWTP would increase GHG emissions, 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-52 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR but this would be somewhat offset by the reduction in emissions associated with the smaller acreage developed as part of Phase 5 (to make room for the WWTP). Impacts associated with the County Development Plan would be the same as the City Development Plan for impact AQ.1-4, associated with the development phase construction. Mitigation measures would still apply. Impacts associated with AQ.5-10, construction and operational activities of the development phase, would be the same as the City plan, and mitigation measure would still apply. Some additional emissions may occur due to the operations at the WWTP. Emissions of ROG from a WWTP are a function of the facility design, the level of industrial effluent treated as well as the level of biological oxygen demand generated by residential customers (EPA AP-42). As these inputs are not known at this time, an approximate estimate of the criteria emissions are generated based on EIRs from other WWTPs. Due to the relatively efficient operations and emission controls generally installed on WWTP, emissions of ROG could range from about 1.3 pounds/day (City of Merced 2006) to 14 pounds/day (IONA 2009). These are emissions from the WWTP processes only. Emissions from internal combustion engines related to digester gas combustion or other processes would increase the ROG emissions and generate NOx, CO, SOx and PM emissions, if engines are included in the design. The WWTP would generate some additional CH4 emissions from treatment processes (assuming no combustion at the WWTP from digester gases, etc.). Annual CH4 emissions contributing to GHG emissions would total about 15 MTCO2e per 1,000 people served by the WWTP (EPA AP- 42). Impacts associated with odors could occur due to the location of the WWTP. These are discussed below. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AQ.11 Operational activities associated with the County Development Plan WWTP could generate odor emissions. Development Class II According to the SLOAPCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, “If a project has the potential to cause an odor or other nuisance problem which could impact a considerable number of people, then it may be considered significant.” The Handbook also indicates the project screening distance for nuisance sources category “wastewater treatment plant” is 1 mile. A distance of 1 mile from the proposed WWTP would encompass all of the areas associated with the proposed development Project phases as well as numerous residential and business communities along Broad Street and Tank Farm Road east of Broad Street. Therefore, the impact could be considered significant. Mitigation measures can be applied to WWTPs, depending on the design of the WWTP. Mitigation measures could include measures to capture or reduce the emissions of odors from the plant (SMAQMD 2011). 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-53 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures AQ-11 Prior to issuance of building or construction permits for the WWTP, the Applicant shall, where applicable, apply to the SLOAPCD for permits and develop an odor Control plan in coordination with the SLOAPCD. Residual Impacts Implementation of the above listed mitigation measures would help to reduce odor emissions. Mitigation measures at WWTP are well established and extensive and proven effective. These measures often include: Activated carbon filters/carbon adsorption in primary clarifiers, headworks building, aeration basin influent channel, and/or all waste gas exhaust systems; Biofiltration/bio trickling filters for waste gas exhaust systems; Fine bubble aerators to wastewater treatment tanks or ponds to increase treatment efficiency and dissolved oxygen to prevent odor-generating anaerobic activity; Hooded enclosures on grit dumpsters and belt filter presses, primary clarifier weir covers, and/or channel seals; Wet and dry scrubbers on waste gas exhaust systems from treatment tanks; Caustic and hypochlorite chemical scrubbers on waste gas exhaust systems from treatment tanks; Ammonia scrubber on waste gas exhaust from treatment tanks; Energy-efficient blower system to increase treatment efficiency and dissolved oxygen levels; Thermal oxidizer to oxidize all waste gas exhaust; Caps or covers on storage basins and anaerobic ponds to avoid release of odorous compounds. Impacts would therefore be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.1.7 Cumulative Analysis None of the proposed development found under the cumulative projects list (see Chapter 3.0, Cumulative Scenario and Methodology) would be constructed in the immediate vicinity of the Project where there would be localized impacts associated with cumulative projects (health risk from construction diesel or localized hot spots of nitrogen dioxide, for example). Regional impacts could be realized, however, since multiple projects would emit into the South Central Coast Air Basin at the same time. All of the projects are within the South Central Coast Air Basin and most of these projects are also within the San Luis Obispo planning area. All projects within the San Luis Obispo planning area are subject to the air quality impact program as detailed in the Air Quality Handbook (SLOAPCD 2012) through standard mitigation measures and off-site mitigation which identifies improvements that will help reduce some of the cumulative air quality impacts. All cumulative projects must comply with SLOAPCD rules and regulations that include air emission reduction strategies for the basin. These, in concert with individual project mitigation measures, will help reduce air quality impacts. However, until the San Luis Obispo area as a 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-54 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR whole attains all federal and state standards, it is likely that the air emissions from the cumulative projects would be regionally significant. 4.1.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.1.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party AQ-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, and throughout project construction, as applicable, the Applicant shall implement the following construction emission reduction measures: a. Properly maintain all construction equipment according to manufacturer’s specifications; b. Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment with CARB-certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road); c. Use CARB Tier 3 certified diesel construction equipment or cleaner off-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with state Off- Road Regulations; d. Use CARB 2007 or cleaner certified on-road heavy-duty diesel trucks and comply with state On-Road Regulations; e. If construction or trucking companies that are awarded the bid or are subcontractors for the project do not have equipment to meet the above two measures, the impacts from the dirtier equipment shall be addressed through SLOAPCD-approved off-site or other mitigation measures; f. All on- and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5 minute idling limit; g. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies. (Sensitive receptors are defined in the SLOAPCD Handbook as people that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include schools, parks and playgrounds, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential dwelling units); Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-55 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party h. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies; No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; i. Equipment shall be electrified when feasible; j. Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel- powered equipment, where feasible; and k. Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane, or biodiesel. AQ-1b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure SLOAPCD regulations that prohibit developmental burning of vegetative material within San Luis Obispo County are followed. Limits/notes on design documents/ plans Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-1c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that portable equipment and engines 50 horsepower or greater, used during grading and construction activities must have a California portable equipment registration (issued by the ARB) or an SLOAPCD permit. Proof of registration must be provided to the SLOAPCD prior to the start of grading or construction or a permit secured from the SLOAPCD prior to the start of grading or construction. The following list is as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements, but it is not exclusive: a. Power screens, conveyors, diesel engines, and/or crushers; b. Portable generators and equipment with 50- horsepower or greater engines; c. Internal combustion engines; d. Unconfined abrasive blasting operations; e. Concrete batch plants; f. Rock and pavement crushing; g. Tub grinders; and h. Trommel screens. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain the required SLOAPCD permits for the hydrocarbon contaminated soil. In addition, the following measures shall be implemented unless otherwise directed by the SLOAPCD upon a finding that alternative measures will result in equal or greater reduction in emission of air contaminants. a. Covers on storage piles shall be maintained in Review of construction Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-56 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party place at all times in areas not actively involved in soil addition or removal; b. Contaminated soil shall be covered with at least six inches of packed uncontaminated soil or other TPH –non-permeable barrier such as plastic tarp or other methods as approved by the SLOCAPCD. No headspace shall be allowed where vapors could accumulate; c. Covered piles shall be designed in such a way to eliminate erosion due to wind or water. No openings in the covers are permitted; d. The air quality impacts from the excavation and haul trips associated with removing the contaminated soil must be evaluated, with emissions estimates provided to the SLOAPCD and mitigated with low emission trucks, low emission construction equipment and/or offsets if needed, if total emissions exceed the SLOAPCD’s construction phase thresholds. An estimate of these emissions is included in this EIR; e. During soil excavation, odors shall not be evident to such a degree as to cause a public nuisance or violation of SLOAPCD regulations would result; f. Clean soil must be segregated from contaminated soil; and g. The permit shall specify applicable criteria established by SLOAPCD. The notification and permitting determination requirements shall be directed to the SLOAPCD Engineering Division. AQ-1e Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, or during construction, if emissions of ROG+NOx with the above mitigations still exceed the thresholds, the Applicant shall secure SLOAPCD-approved off-site reductions in ROG + NOx emissions to ensure that ROG + NOx emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD quarterly thresholds. Coordination with the SLOAPCD should begin at least six (6) months prior to issuance of grading permits for the Project to allow time for refining calculations and for the SLOAPCD to review and approve the CAMP and off-site mitigation approach. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-1f Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that all grading and construction equipment greater than 100 bhp be equipped with CARB Level 3 diesel particulate catalysts, or equivalent, to achieve an 85 percent reduction in diesel Review construction plans and contractor requirements, Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-57 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party particulate emissions. If CARB verified Level 3 DPFs cannot be secured for all of the equipment greater than 100 hp then the applicant will work to offset the added DPM with measures including but not limited to schedule modifications, implementation of no idling requirement, and expanded implementation of AQ-1a measures "i", "j", and "k"(e.g. use of alternative fueled generators). in-field inspections AQ-1g Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall produce a schedule detailing the phasing of activities for each OU and ensuring that the emissions of diesel particulate in any quarter falls below the applicable SLOAPCD thresholds. This could include measures such as ensuring that Reservoir 5 Cap, Reservoir 7 Cap and North Marsh remediation do not coincide. As an alternative approach, if scheduling is not feasible, the Applicant shall provide SLOAPCD- approved off-site reductions in DPM emissions to ensure that DPM emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-2a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall provide satisfactory evidence that a SLOAPCD-approved Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) has been prepared that addresses fugitive dust emissions. The Plan shall include requirements in the SLOAPCD CEQA Handbook. Fugitive dust mitigation measures in the plan shall include a combination of the following, as approved by the SLOAPCD: a. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. b. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. An adequate water supply source must be identified. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. c. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed, covered, or a SLOAPCD-approved alternative method will be used. (90 percent reduction). d. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved Project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. e. Exposed ground areas that will be reworked at Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-58 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast- germinating non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established, unless other dust and erosion control measures are specified in the agency-approved Dust Control Plan. f. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD. g. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. h. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. i. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. j. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible l. Apply water every 3 hours to disturbed areas within the construction site (61 percent reduction in particulate emissions). m. Application of soil binders to dirt roads shall be applied to achieve at least an 80 percent reduction in fugitive dust emissions. All soil binders used shall be ‘environmentally friendly’ and shall be either lignosulfonate- or calcium lignosulfonate-based approved by the SLOAPCD. All dust control methods, including soil binders, shall be demonstrated in the fugitive dust control plan to ensure compliance with SLOAPCD Rule 401. n. All roadway, driveway, and sidewalk paving should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-59 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party o. The contractor or builder shall designate a person to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and oversee mitigation measure implementation as per SLOAPCD approval to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions to less than 20 percent opacity, and to prevent transport of dust off-site. The designated monitor shall carry out these duties on regular workdays, as well as holidays and weekends when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of the designated monitor shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or demolition. AQ-2b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit an APCD approved Construction Activity Monitoring Plan (CAMP), which shall include, but not be limited to the following elements: a. A Dust Control Management Plan that encompasses all, but is not limited to, measures associated with impact AQ.1 and AQ.2; b. Tabulation of on- and off-road construction equipment information (e.g., make, model, type, engine tier, DPM Level 3 filter age, horse-power, and miles or hours of operation); c. Construction truck trips scheduled during non- peak hours to reduce peak-hour emissions; d. Limited construction work-day period, if necessary; and e. Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-2c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle-restricting measures for both on- and off-road equipment during the Project grading and construction phase near sensitive receptors: a. Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low-particulate engine technologies. No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the recreational fields when in use; b. Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted or applicable measures shall be employed as per the direction of the SLOCAPCD, including monitoring or low- particulate engine technologies. No staging, queuing or idling within 1,000 feet of the Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-60 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party recreational fields when in use; c. Use alternative fueled equipment whenever possible; and d. Signs identifying the no idling requirements must be posted and enforced at the construction site. AQ-2d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle-restricting measures for on-road vehicles during the grading and construction phase of the Project: a. Section 2485 of Title 13, the California Code of Regulations limits diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles that operate in the State of California with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds and licensed for operation on highways. It applies to California and non-California based vehicles. In general, the regulation specifies that drivers of these vehicles: Shall not idle the vehicle’s primary diesel engine for more than 5 minutes at any location, except as noted in Subsection (d) of the regulation; and, Shall not operate a diesel-fueled auxiliary power system (APS) to power a heater, air conditioner, or any ancillary equipment on that vehicle during sleeping or resting in a sleeper berth for greater than 5 minutes at any location when within 100 feet of a restricted area, except as noted in Subsection (d) of the regulation. b. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind on-road equipment operators of the 5-minute idling limit. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-2e Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall implement the following idle restricting measures for off-road vehicles during the construction phase of the Project: a. Off-road diesel equipment shall comply with the 5-minute idling restriction identified in Section 2449(d)(3) of the CARB In-Use off- Road Diesel regulation: www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/ordiesl07/frooal.p df. b. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and job sites to remind off-road equipment operators of the 5-minute idling limit. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-61 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party AQ-2f Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit a geologic evaluation under the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, to determine if Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) is present within the area that will be disturbed. NOA has been identified as a toxic air contaminant by the CARB. If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site, the Applicant must 1) comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the SLOAPCD; 2) require that any crushing operations do not result in any dust that is visible crossing the property line, does not discharge into the air any visible emissions other than uncombined water vapor, for a period aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour which are 50 percent as dark or darker in shade as that designated as number one on the Ringlemann Chart or exceed at 10 % opacity; and 3) conduct a geological evaluation prior to any grading. Technical Appendix 4.4 of the SLOAPCD CEQA Handbook includes a map of zones throughout the County where NOA has been found. More information on NOA is available at http://www.slocleanair.org/business/asbestos.php Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-2g Prior to issuance of demolition permit, the Applicant shall comply with asbestos containing material (ACM) requirements. Demolition activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues surrounding proper handling, demolition, and disposal of ACM. ACM could be encountered during demolition or remodeling of existing buildings. Asbestos can also be found in utility pipes and pipelines (transite pipes or insulation on pipes). If utility pipelines are scheduled for removal or relocation or a building(s) is proposed to be removed or renovated, various regulatory requirements may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M - asbestos NESHAP). These requirements include but are not limited to: (1) notification to the SLOAPCD; (2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified Asbestos Inspector; and (3) applicable removal and disposal requirements of identified ACM. More information on asbestos is available at http://www.slocleanair.org/business/asbestos.php. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-62 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.1.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation measures AQ-1a though AQ-1g and AQ-2a though AQ-2f would apply to the City Development Plan during development construction. See the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Remediation above for a list of these measures. Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party AQ-6a Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce area source emissions, where applicable. a. Increase walls and attic insulation by 20 percent above what is required by the 2008 Title 24 requirements. b. Shade tree planting along southern exposures of buildings to reduce summer cooling needs. c. Shade tree planting in parking lots to reduce evaporative emissions from parked vehicles. d. Use built-in energy efficient appliances, were applicable. e. Orient buildings toward streets with convenient pedestrian and transit access. f. Use double-paned windows. g. Use sodium low-energy parking lot and streetlights. (e.g., sodium) h. Use energy efficient interior lighting. i. Incorporate energy efficient skylights into roof plan (i.e., should meet the EPA/DOE Energy Star® rating). j. Install High efficiency or gas space heating. k. Install door sweeps and weather stripping if more efficient doors and windows are not available. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-6b Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits or lease agreement, the Applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce vehicle emissions. a. Locate electrical vehicle charging station(s) in the parking lots at a ratio required by County or City ordinance or as recommended by APCD. b. In coordination with the City Transit Management, provide transit demand enhancements (i.e., additional stops, shelters, phones) within the Project impact area to meet the increased ridership demand associated with the Project. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-63 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party c. Provide on-site long-and short-term bicycle parking consistent with location and design criteria established by the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan, with installation and design guidance provided by the City’s Community Design Guidelines. One bicycle parking space for every 10 employees is considered appropriate. d. Provide shower stalls and locker facilities to encourage employees to bike or walk to work. e. The Applicant or lessee shall meet with SLOCOG’s Rideshare Program Coordinator to develop a Trip Reduction Plan to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director and APCD. The Trip Reduction Plan shall include the following: 1) A comprehensive Transportation Demand Management program for employees. The TDM may include: (a) private vanpool operation; (b) transit and vanpool fare subsidies; (c) pay parking for employees; d) provision of subscription bus services; e) alternative work hours; (f) capital improvements for transit services; (g) reduction of parking fees for carpools and vanpools; (h) Bikeway linkages to established bicycle routes; and (i) provision of an on-site employee transportation and rideshare coordinator. 2) Preferential carpool and vanpool parking for employees. 3) A lunch-time shuttle to reduce single occupant vehicle trips. 4) On-site facilities for eating and convenience including refrigeration, automatic banking, and other vending for employees. 5) Incentive programs, similar to the County Rideshare Transportation Choices Program, to reduce employee commute trips. Programs should be coordinated with adjacent commercial development with a goal to achieve an Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) of 1.20 persons per vehicle or greater. 6) The Applicant shall set aside funds equivalent to three month enrollment in Rideshare’s Back ‘N’ Forth Club for 25 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-64 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party percent of all employees (a maximum of 52,230 for this project). This fund shall be managed by APCD through a program similar to the “Flash Pass” used for the San Luis Obispo Home Depot development. If funds are not used for this purpose, they may be used for other incentives that have been included in the approved Trip Reduction Plan. f. The Applicant shall coordinate with the City and APCD to pursue a shared use agreement to use over-supplied parking areas for a potential park-and-ride lot. The park-and-ride lot should be away from building entrances and as close as possible to the parking lot entrance nearest to Tank Farm Road or fronting street. The target number of park-and-ride spaces should be 25. The parking area should be identified with signage and registered with the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments as an official park-and-ride lot. g. Implement on-site circulation design elements in parking lots to reduce vehicle queuing and improve the pedestrian and bicycle environment. AQ-6c Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, if emissions of ROG+NOx with the above mitigations still exceed the thresholds, the Applicant shall secure SLOAPCD approved off-site reductions in ROG+NOx emissions from the SLOAPCD to ensure that ROG+NOx emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD daily and annual thresholds. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD AQ-6d Implement a program of periodic wet-vacuum street sweeping in coordination with APCD in order to reduce vehicle-related fugitive dust emissions. Review of Plan documents Site Inspection Before construction During construction SLOAPCD AQ-8 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits for each phase, the Applicant shall include building efficiency improvements and/or off-site reductions in GHG emissions to ensure that GHG emissions do not exceed the SLOAPCD thresholds. Review of Plan documents Before construction SLOAPCD 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-65 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.1.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation measures AQ-1a though AQ-1g and AQ-2a though AQ-2g would apply to the County Development Plan during development construction. See the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Remediation above for a list of these measures. All mitigation measures identified for the City Development Plan would apply to the County Development Plan. See the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the City Development Plan above for a list of these measures. Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party AQ-11 Prior to issuance of building or construction permits for the WWTP, the Applicant shall, where applicable, apply to the SLOAPCD for permits and develop an odor Control plan in coordination with the SLOAPCD. Review of design documents and plan Before construction and before operations SLOAPCD 4.1.9 References Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP). 2007. Recommendations by the Association of Environmental Professionals on How to Analyze Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Climate Change in CEQA Documents. Comment Draft. White Paper. March. American Petroleum Institute (API). 2004. Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the Oil And Gas Industry. Feb, 2004. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2009. Workshop Draft Option report. CEQA Thresholds of Significance. April 2009. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2006. Inventory of California Greenhouse gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2004. Staff Final Report. December. Available on the Internet: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-600-2006-013/CEC-600-2006-013- SF.PDF. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2008. “CEQA and Climate Change”, January 2009. “Health Risk Assessments For Proposed Land Use Projects”, July 2010. “Quantifying GHG Mitigation Measures” August California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2006. Public Workshop to Discuss Establishing the 1990 Emissions Level and the California 2020 Limit and Developing Regulations to Require Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Sacramento, CA, December 1 2007. Climate Change: Information Regarding ARB's Climate Change Program Pursuant to2006 Assembly Bill 32, (web page), last updated July 17, 2007, www.arb.ca.gov/cc/cc.htm, accessed July 24 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Chevron Tank Farm 4.1-66 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2008. Preliminary Draft Staff Proposal, Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act, October 24 California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod). CalEEMod User’s Manual and Program. Accessed online at http://www.caleemod.com/ City of Orange. 2010. Greenhouse Gas Interim Guidance, April 26 City of San Luis Obispo (City of SLO). 2009. Community and Municipal Operations 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Public Hearing Draft, August Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1992. Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series, Estimation of Air Impacts for the Excavation of Contaminated Soils, EPA 450/1-92-004, March 1992 2007. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2005 (April 2007) USEPA #430-R-07-002 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC ). 2007. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis, summary for policy makers. (Working Group 1 Fourth Assessment Report). February 2007. Available online at: http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf>. Kiparsky, M. and P.H. Gleick. 2003. Climate Change and California Water Resources: A Survey and Summary of the Literature. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute for Studies in Development. July 2003. Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS). 1997. Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol, Institute of Transportation Studies, December 1997. Padre Associates Inc. (Padre). 2012. Report of Findings Geologic Evaluation of Naturally Occurring Asbestos and Material Durability Assessment, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, December. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Board Meeting Minutes and Staff Report, http://www.aqmd.gov/hb/2008/December/081231a.htm San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). 2009. Climate Change Action Plan, Addressing GHG Emissions under CEQA, Draft Staff Report, April. San Luis Obispo County (SLO County). 2009. Community-Wide And Municipal Operations 2006 Baseline Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, County of San Luis Obispo General Plan, April San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD) 2001. Clean Air Plan CAP), December 2001. 2007. Nipomo Mesa Particulate Study 2008. Annual Air Quality Report for 2007, November 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases December 2013 4.1-67 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD). 2011. “Technology- And Design-Based Odor Reduction Measures”, revised June 2011. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2 Biological Resources A substantial number of biological resource studies have been conducted on the Project Site during the past fifteen years. Results of the studies were presented in various documents prepared on behalf of the Applicant. They include general resource assessments, execution plans, restoration plans, technical reports, and results of specific studies. Information contained in these documents provides the basis for the Biological Resources section of this Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Documents most integral to the preparation of this section include: Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment for the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Prepared for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team. Prepared by BBL Sciences. Ratified May 25, 2004 Chevron Environmental Management Company (CEMC). 2007. Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Re-development Project, San Luis Obispo, California. December 20, 2007. Padre Associates Inc. and WSP Ecosystem Science & Natural Resources Management Services. 2009. Landscape Restoration for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management Company. January 2009. 56 pp. Padre Associates Inc. and WSP Ecosystem Science & Natural Resources Management Services. 2008a. An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management Company. August 5, 2008. 62 pp. plus appendices. Note: this is the most recent and most complete of several wetland delineation reports prepared for this Project Site. Padre Associates Inc. and WSP Environment and Energy. 2008b. Description and Analysis of the Botanical Resources, Including Vascular Plant Species of Conservation Concern, at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Final Report. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management Company. December. 38 pp. plus appendices. Padre Associates Inc. and WSP Environment and Energy. 2008c. Operational Guidebook to Assessment of Riverine Waters and wetlands Functions at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility San Luis Obispo, California Final Report. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management Company. December. 124 pp. plus appendices. Note: this document includes support information to Padre Associates Inc. and WSP Environment and Energy (2008a). Padre Associates Inc. 2008d. Protocol-level California Red-legged Frog Survey Report for the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site (Tank Farm), San Luis Obispo County, California. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management Company. December.13 pp. plus appendices. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Padre Associates Inc. 2008e. Burrowing Owl Survey Report for the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site (Tank Farm), San Luis Obispo County, California. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management Company. September. 7 pp. plus appendices. Padre Associates, Inc. 2013c. One-Parameter Wetland Clarification Memo for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2003a.Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Phase I Biological Studies. Final Report. Prepared for Union Oil Company of California. September 10, 2003. 8 pp. plus appendices. Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2003b. Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Phase II Biological Studies. Final Report. Prepared for Union Oil Company of California. October 10, 2003. 6 pp. plus appendices. Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2004. Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Phase III Biological Studies. Final Report. Prepared for Union Oil Company of California. June 3, 2004. 12 pp. plus appendices. Padre Associates, Inc. 2012. 90-Day Report on Wet Season Vernal Pool Branchiopod Surveys for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California. July 18, 2012. Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2005. Unocal Corporation San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Comprehensive Fairy Shrimp Wet and Dry Season Survey Report. October 18, 2005. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Biological Opinion for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Cultural Resource Surveys and Soil Assessment Activities, San Luis Obispo County, California (8-8-10-F-63) (File No. SPL-2010-00604-BAH). Issued January 13, 2011. Padre Associates, Inc. 2012. California Red-Legged Frog Survey for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. California. August 27, 2012. Padre Associates, Inc. 2013 Biological Resource Survey Letter-Report for the Off-Site Flower Mound Impact Area, Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. Copies of the relevant biological resource reports for the Project Site are included in Appendix C, and the predictive Ecological Risk Assessment is included in Appendix H, H.2. The EIR project team included Storrer Environmental Services biologists John Storrer and Tom Olson who reviewed each of the background documents for content and accuracy. Methods of gathering data for specific resources were evaluated for conformance with agency-approved survey protocols. Descriptive information presented in these reports was verified during general field reconnaissance by Mr. Storrer and Mr. Olson on July 22, 2009 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2.1 Environmental Setting There is a large body of recently collected data from the Project Site. Information for the Environmental Setting subsection was taken from previous reports, including the Project Execution Plan (CEMC 2007), Landscape Restoration Plan (Padre and WSP 2009), and Description and Analysis of the Botanical Resources (Padre 2008b). These documents include comprehensive environmental setting and site-specific information on biological resources. Portions of these documents were incorporated into this subsection. Data from more focused technical studies, such as surveys for California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii [CRLF]), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), and wetlands, are also incorporated as appropriate for specific resources. Conclusions regarding plant and animal species of regional concern (e.g., potential for occurrence, breeding/non-breeding) are based on a review of the technical information and reflect the opinions of the preparers of this section, John Storrer and Tom Olson. 4.2.1.1 Overview of the Project Site Topography, soils, and vegetation have been altered considerably at the Project Site via cultivation techniques (such as plowing and disking), construction and removal of tanks and associated berms, stream channelization, and other anthropogenic alterations. As such, the Project Site is dominated by non-native annual grasslands. Waters of the U.S., including wetlands, are prominent within the Project Site. Many of the waters and wetlands at the Project Site are associated with natural features; however, some of the depressional wetlands are associated with remnant, man-made depressions from decommissioning the former oil storage facility The Project site contains several surface hydrocarbon expressions of oil, sheen, liquid oil and locations of pliable oil. These surface hydrocarbon expressions have resulted in increased exposure risks to plants and wildlife species in the area. In addition, some of these areas pose a real and recorded risk for entrapment (Chevron prepares a Monthly Surface Hydrocarbon Inspection and Mitigation Monitoring Report). Numerous wildlife species have been reported being found entrapped. Since 2007, 65 animals have been recorded as being entrapped and released, 12 were found dead, and two were found, collected and brought to Pacific Wildlife Care. Many more animals prior to the 2007 reporting are expected to have been affected by these hydrocarbon expressions and the netting enclosures attempting to restrict access to these areas. 4.2.1.2 Climate The San Luis Obispo area has a mild, Mediterranean climate with warm, dry summers and wetter, cooler winters. The average maximum temperature (by month) ranges from 63 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) in January to 79.5°F in September. Average minimum temperatures range between 41.6°F in January and 53°F in August (Station No. 047851-4) (WRCC 2007). In this coastal area, the majority of precipitation comes as rainfall during the winter months (November through April). Average annual precipitation is 23.45 inches (WRCC 2007). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2.1.3 Geomorphic Setting The Project Site is a partially filled coastal basin composed primarily of alluvium. The northern portion of the Project Site is characterized by a slope wetland that serves at the headwaters of a small, unnamed tributary that has been mostly disconnected from San Luis Obispo Creek due to anthropogenic activities. This area is a colluvial toe slope that grades to valley alluvium, which dominates the central and southern portions of the Project Site. The valley alluvium surface is approximately 8,000 to 10,000 years old while the colluvial toe slope is a somewhat older surface. This landscape has been shaped by the wandering meanders of San Luis Obispo Creek as it moved back and forth across the basin (WSP 2007). The Project Site is located in a geologically complex and seismically active region. The underlying geologic structure has been formed by millions of years of folding and faulting as the Pacific plate moves north along the North American plate. Geologic structure in this landscape is oriented primarily in a northwesterly direction with the coast range. The central California coast is subject to damaging earthquakes on a regular basis, most of which are associated with the San Andreas Fault. However, there have been a number of earthquakes of magnitude 5.0 and greater on other faults that have affected large portions of the Central Coast. 4.2.1.4 Soils The map "Geology of California, San Luis Obispo Sheet," published by the California Division of Mines and Geology and dated 1958, indicates that the Project Site is located within the Coast Range geomorphic province of California. Serpentine hills are located to the northeast and the Project Site is underlain by alluvial deposits (CDMG 1959). According to the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service's Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, Coastal Part, the Project Site is underlain by Cropley clay USDA 1984). Specifically, the majority of the soils within the Project Site have been designated Xererts-Xerolls-Urban land complex (Ernstrom 1984). The Xererts-Xerolls-Urban land complex is used to describe areas that have been modified by heavy equipment such that their physical characteristics have been modified. The Xererts of this complex are Cropley or Diablo clays that vary physically depending on changes in moisture content. The Xerolls of this complex consist of several soil types that have slowly permeable clay subsoils which also shrink and swell with changes in moisture content (Ernstrom 1984). These soils typically provide substrate that is suitable for listed vernal pool branchiopod species and several locally sensitive plant species. 4.2.1.5 Hydrology The natural drainage patterns of the Project Site have been drastically altered due to historical activity (i.e., construction of containment berms). Figure 4.2-1 shows the site drainage patterns. The East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek has been channelized by containment berms along the eastern and southern boundaries of the Project Site. However, the historical ox-bow channel and associated floodplain areas are still evident due to remnant mixed willow scrub habitat. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.2-1 –Overview of Watersheds that Impact Chevron Tank Farm Property – Existing Conditions Source: Avocet 2009 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR In addition, containment berms constructed around the former oil tanks have created ephemeral wet areas and seasonal wet meadow throughout the Project Site that alter flood flow and contribute to groundwater recharge. Currently, the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek, along the eastern boundary, is the principal drainage for the Project Site. A regional overview of drainage in the area shows that drainage from most of the Margarita Area (directly north of the Project Site) is transported to the east branch San Luis Obispo Creek via the west, middle, and east forks of Tank Farm Creek, (i.e., through the North Marsh) that join the East Fork San Luis Obispo Creek at the southwest corner of the Airport area. The remaining Margarita Area drainage is collected in Acacia Creek, which joins the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek near the intersection of Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road. Drainage travels through the Project Site and adjacent areas on a generally southwesterly course until the East Fork of the San Luis Obispo Creek joins San Luis Obispo Creek downstream of the Project Site. Portions of the southwestern and southeastern areas of the Project Site are within the 100-year floodplain. All of the wetlands on the site are described as either “ephemeral” or intermittent” (Padre 2008a). The East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek downstream of the SLO Tank Farm is infrequently intermittent or perennial (Padre 2008a). 4.2.1.6 Vegetation One hundred twenty-eight vascular plant species were identified within the Project Site during the field surveys conducted by Rincon (2003) and Padre (2008b). A complete list of plant species identified on the Project Site (Padre 2008b) is provided in Appendix C (all scientific nomenclature based on Hickman 1993). Plants observed consisted of 58 native taxa (45 percent of the total number of plants) and 70 non- native taxa (55 percent of the total). The relatively high percentage of non-native taxa was likely influenced by a high level of site disturbance associated with past oil operations, maintenance, abandonment, and past and continued cattle grazing. Several biological surveys were conducted by Padre and WSP biologists (2008a and 2008b) at the Project Site for the purpose of habitat characterization and identification of jurisdictional wetlands. Various vegetation types were found, including both wetland and upland habitats. Upland plant communities were classified using the Holland (1986) classification system. These include non-native annual grassland, native perennial grassland, seasonal wet meadow, freshwater marsh, coyote brush scrub, and mixed riparian woodland. The classification used for the waters and wetlands plant communities was developed for waters and wetlands in central and southern coastal California (Ferren et al. 1996). This classification is a regionalized version of the widely accepted U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats (Ferren et al.1996; Cowardin et al. 1979). Historic and current land uses at the Project Site have had profound effects on its hydrology. These include ditching, grading, cultivation, redirection and/or consolidation of storm water to and through the site, oil spill containment features, and installation of numerous drainage and pipe systems. The effects on wetland resources at the Project Site were determined through interpretation of aerial 4.2 Biological Resources June 2013 4.2-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Public Draft EIR photography and field evaluation. Because of these site modifications and their effects on current hydrologic, soil, and vegetation conditions at the Project Site, the Padre technical team chose to delineate waters and wetlands using a combination of “Routine” and “Atypical” approaches as articulated in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Environmental Laboratory 1987). A detailed description of the methodology used for characterizing and classifying wetland resources at the Project Site is provided in Padre 2008c and clarified in Padre 2013c. Figure 4.2-2 shows distribution of the primary vegetation types or plant communities (Padre and WSP 2008c). Annual Grassland California annual grasslands are comprised of a sparse to dense cover of various non-native, annual grasses, often interspersed with native and non-native forbs. The annual grassland vegetation type covers most of the Project Site, and is highly variable in species composition, depending on the location. Representative non-native grassland species found on-site include Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus), hare barley (Hordeum murinum var. leporinum), ripgut grass (Bromus diandrus), and slender wild oat (Avena barbata). Common broad-leaved species include bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), cut-leaf plantain (Plantago coronopus), bristly ox-tongue (Picris echioides), hayfield tarplant (Deinandra congesta ssp. luzulifolia), star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis), and western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya) (Padre 2008c). Native Perennial Grassland This vegetation type occurs in relatively disturbed conditions at the northeast portion of the Project Site, just west of the former quarry area. Similar to the annual grassland, non-native annual species, primarily slender wild oat and ripgut grass, comprise a large portion of the composition, but it also supports many individuals of native purple needlegrass (Nasella pulchra) (Padre 2008c). Coyote Brush Scrub Coyote brush scrub habitat occurs in scattered locations throughout the Project Site. Dominant species within this habitat include coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis var. consanguinea) and California sagebrush (Artemisia californica) as well as a variety of non-native herbaceous species similar to those present in the annual grassland plant vegetation type. Seasonal Wet Meadow Much of the wetlands present is ephemeral and occur in various patterns, due to the historical activity on the Project Site (e.g., excavation, construction of containment berms). This has allowed establishment of a wide range of seasonal wet meadows with highly variable species composition. Species observed include saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), spikerush (Eleocharis macrostachya), beardgrass (Polypogon monspeliensis), tall flatsedge (Cyperus eragrostis), brass buttons (Cotula coronopifolia), rush (Juncus spp.), curly dock (Rumex crispus), and cocklebur Xanthium strumarium). Other species commonly found include bristly ox-tongue, meadow barley (Hordeum brachyantherum), and Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) Padre 2008c). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-8 June 2013 Remediation and Development Project Public Draft EIR Figure 4.2-2 – Plant Communities on the Project Site Source: Padre WSP 2008c 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Three “potential pool locations” (totaling less than approximately 0.25 acres) were identified in the northeast portion of the Project Site (“Flower Mound” area) during the Padre 2012 October surveys (Padre 2013). These potential pools are not included in Figures 4.2-2 or the final wetland acreage. These areas did not contain water during the time of the surveys and were not formally delineated. Appropriate wetland delineations will be conducted in the winter/spring of 2012/2013. Acreages will be finalized prior to any site disturbances. Freshwater Marsh Numerous freshwater marsh communities exist throughout the Project Site. A large area, adjacent to the north side of Tank Farm Road (North Marsh), comprises several acres of marsh. Additionally, two of the remnant concrete-lined reservoirs (Reservoirs 5 and 7) have established freshwater marsh vegetation. A drainage canal along the west side of the Project Site (Western Marsh) and several small patches on the south side of the Project Site also support freshwater marsh vegetation. Species observed include cattail (Typha angustifolia), bulrush (Scirpus acutus), nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus), spikerush, and water plantain (Alisma plantago- aquatica) (EDAW 1999; CEMC 2007). Mixed Riparian The portion of Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek which run along the eastern and southern boundaries of the Project Site support a variety of riparian vegetation. The mixed riparian habitat is dominated by a tall, patchy canopy of western sycamore (Platanus racemosa), arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis.), red willow (Salix laevigata), and cottonwood Populus fremontii), with a few occurrences of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) and black walnut Juglans californica) (EDAW 1999). In addition to the riparian vegetation type along the creeks, several bermed areas on the southwestern portion of the Project Site, along the margins of freshwater marsh vegetation types, have established willows. Further, several depressions west of the creek channel appear to be remnants of historical channel meanders and contain dense canopies of willow, sycamore, and cottonwood (EDAW 1999). Disturbed Rock Outcrop A disturbed rock outcrop (i.e., former quarry site) exists in the northeastern corner of the Project Site and contains a mixture of serpentine rock outcrops along the upper slopes and clay-loam soils along the lower slopes. Areas of non-native grasses, including species described within the annual grassland habitat, as well as scattered occurrences of herbaceous species such as poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), cudweed everlasting (Gnaphalium luteo-album), and red valerian Centranthus ruber) exist on the lower slopes. The serpentine rock outcrops along the upper slopes support species such as slender buckwheat (Eriogonum elongatum var. elongatum) and the special-status San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya (Dudleya abramsii ssp. bettinae) (Padre 2008c). Ornamental Several species of ornamental trees occur in scattered locations throughout the Project Site. These species include Peruvian pepper tree (Schinus molle), blackwood acacia (Acacia melanoxylon), green wattle (Acacia decurrens), and firethorn (Pyracantha angustifolia). Seasonal Wet Meadow/Tarflat Seasonal wet meadow vegetation types exist on surface exposures of asphalt/tar slag. Several areas within the Project Site have little or no soil surface and are partly to completely inundated 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR by precipitation and runoff in the early spring. Plant species that establish within the cracks in the substrate include a small sub-set of the seasonal wet meadow species listed above (Padre 2008c). Willow -Cottonwood/Concrete-Asphalt Willow-cottonwood vegetation types exist within the remnants of Reservoir 2, a concrete-lined earthen reservoir. The dominant riparian species, which include cottonwoods and willows, are well-established in the cracked, concrete-asphalt substrate. This area is often inundated during the rainy season and also contains herbaceous species similar to those present in the seasonal wet meadow/tarflat (EDAW 1999). 4.2.1.7 Wildlife Wildlife information was developed during field surveys conducted by EXTRIX (1998), Rincon 2003), and Padre (2007, 2013). Detection methods included direct observation with binoculars; examination and identification of tracks, scats, burrows/diggings, and carcasses/skeletal remains; and identification of vocalizations (calls and songs). Surveys were supplemented with previously published wildlife reports, regional and local species distribution references, and coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW, formerly the California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG]) to determine which species occur or potentially occur on the Project Site. Rincon (2003, Appendix C) contains a list of wildlife species observed during field surveys and/or expected to occur on the Project Site. Summary descriptions of faunal groups known or with potential to occur on the Project Site follow. Invertebrates Initial aquatic water column and benthic invertebrate studies resulted in the observation of invertebrates typical of non-flowing seasonally ponded habitats (Rincon 2003a). Following the initial study, a vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi [VPFS]) dry season survey resulted in the positive identification of VPFS at several locations within the site (Rincon 2003b) (see Figure 4.2-3). Rincon (2005) conducted a comprehensive wet and dry season survey for vernal pool fairy shrimp in 2005. Additional wet season surveys were conducted by Padre biologists during the 2011/2012 wet season within previously unoccupied habitat areas in order to evaluate the current occupancy of suitable habitat (Padre 2012a). The three “potential pool locations” (described above) identified in the northeast portion of the Project Site during the Padre 2012 October surveys (Padre 2013) are not included in Figures 4.2- 3 or the potential VPFS acreage. Surveys and agency approval of findings have not yet been finalized. Appropriate VPFS wet season surveys were conducted in the winter/spring of 2012/2013. Dry season sampling will be conducted during summer 2013 to complete the protocol survey requirements and establish VPFS presence/absence in the off-site impact area. Final acreages will be finalized prior to any site disturbances. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.2-3 – Wetlands and Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Habitat Source: Padre WSP 2012a 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Fish The fish species described by Rincon (2003) and Padre (2007) included common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) in the western marsh area, and threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in the creek/riparian areas. Potential habitat for South- central California coast steelhead is present within the East Fork of the San Luis Obispo Creek during high flow periods; the nearest known location for this species was observed in Acacia Creek at Tank Farm Road (E. Weir, 2006). Amphibians Western toad (Anaxyrus boreas), Northern Pacific treefrog (Pseudacris regilla), and adult bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) were observed primarily in the seasonally flooded areas of the Project Site; however, bullfrogs were also observed in the creek /riparian areas (EXTRIX 1998; Rincon 2003). Habitat suitability for two listed amphibian species, CRLF and California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) and one amphibian species of special concern, the western spadefoot toad (Spea hammondii) was also assessed. Suitable habitat for CRLF was identified in both the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and the north and south sides of the Project Site (Padre 2008d). Protocol-level field surveys for CRLF were conducted by Padre in 2008. Padre also conducted a one day, one night dry-season survey and habitat assessment for this species in July 2012 (Padre 2012b). Site Results of surveys for CRLF are summarized in Section 4.2.1.9, Regional Wildlife Species. A habitat assessment, including field surveys, for California tiger salamander and western spadefoot toad were also conducted (Rincon 2003a). Suitable upland and aquatic breeding habitats for both species were found to be present at the Project Site. Results of assessment are summarized in Section 4.2.1.9, Regional Wildlife Species. Reptiles The annual grassland and mixed riparian areas of the Project Site provide the most favorable habitats for reptiles, though field surveys reflect a relatively depauperate herpetofauna. Species observed included western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) and garter snake (Thamnophis sp.) in the upland areas and western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata) in the creek/riparian habitat within adjacent Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek (ENTRIX 1998; CEMC 2007). Other regionally common reptile species, including western gopher snake Pituophis catenifer), western rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis), and common kingsnake Lampropeltis getulus) are also expected to occur. Birds Quantitative survey techniques were employed to evaluate the avian species present at four observation stations representing the general habitat types present at the Project Site (ENTRIX 1999). Species observed included killdeer (Charadrius vociferous), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), cliff swallow (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota), cinnamon teal Anas cyanoptera), mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), great-tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus), spotted sandpiper (Actitis macularia), Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperi), sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus), and downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens) (ENTRIX 1999). In addition, the following bird species were observed within the Project Site during field surveys conducted by Padre in spring/summer 2007: golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), northern harrier (Circus cyaneus), great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), California horned lark (Eremophila alpestris actia), and loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mammals Mammals are typically mobile and may spend time in several different habitats. Thus, the surveys to identify the resident mammals were not restricted or defined by specific sample areas. The daytime and nighttime surveys resulted in the observation of scat, tracks, and direct observation of live individuals. The small, medium and large mammals observed include; western harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis), California vole (Microtus californicus), Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi), black-tailed hare (Lepus californicus), desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), striped skunk Mephitis mephitis), raccoon (Procyon lotor), muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana), coyote (Canis latrans) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) (ENTRIX 1998, CEMC 2007). Rincon (2003, Phase 1, Appendix C) presents the vertebrate and invertebrate taxa observed during field surveys as well as potentially occurring species that may be present at the Project Site. Refer to Rincon 2003, Appendix C for a list of all wildlife species observed and expected to occur at the Project Site. 4.2.1.8 Regional Plant Species of Concern The following narratives briefly present ecological and range information and legal status for those special-status plant species that are known to occur on the Project Site. Specifically, Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia parryi spp. congdonii), Hoover’s button-celery (Eryngium aristatulum var. hooveri), Cambria morning glory (Calystegia subacaulis ssp. subacaulis), San Luis Obispo owl’s clover (Castilleja densiflora ssp. obispoensis), and San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya (Dudleya abramsii ssp. bettinae) have been found on the Project Site. The presence, geographic distribution, and relative density of these five plant species was determined through field surveys conducted in spring and summer of 2008 (Padre 2008b). Table 4.2-1 Definitions of Plants Species of Concern Plant Species of Concern Plants listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (50 CFR 17.12 for listed plants and various notices in the Federal Register for proposed species). Plants that are Category 1 candidates for possible future listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (55 CFR 6184, February 21, 1990). Plants that meet the definitions of rare or endangered species under the CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15380). Plants considered by the CNPS to be "rare, threatened, or endangered" in California (Lists 1B and 2 in Skinner and Pavlik 1994). Plants listed by CNPS as plants about which we need more information and plants of limited distribution (Lists 3 and 4 in Skinner and Pavlik 1994). Plants listed or proposed for listing by the State of California as threatened or endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (14 CCR 670.5). Plants listed under the California Native Plant Protection Act (California Fish and Game Code 1900 et seq.). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-1 Definitions of Plants Species of Concern Plant Species of Concern Plants considered sensitive by other federal (i.e., U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management), state, and local agencies and jurisdictions. Plants considered sensitive or unique by the scientific community or occurring at the limits of its natural range State CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G). Notes: CNPS = California Native Plant Society Two additional plant species, California walnut (Juglans californica) and purple needlegrass Nassella pulchra), which are indicative of habitats considered by state and local jurisdictions to be of regional importance, also occur on the Project Site. Fifteen other plant species of concern were considered as having potential to occur on the Project Site, based on known regional distribution and habitat affinity. Assessment of regional distribution based on several sources of information. The California Natural Diversity Data Base CNDDB) was queried for the 7.5-minute USGS that includes the Project Site (San Luis Obispo) and the eight adjacent quads: Arroyo Grande NE; Atascadero; Lopez Mountain; Morro Bay North; Morro Bay South; Pismo Beach; Port San Luis; and Santa Margarita. Because a review of nine 7.5-minute quads may indicate occurrences more than 10 miles from the site, other sources of information were also consulted to refine the potential occurrence. Technical reports prepared for projects in the vicinity were reviewed, as were regional botanical field guides, such as The Vascular Plants of San Luis Obispo County, California (Hoover 1970) and A Flora of the Santa Barbara Region, California (Smith 1998). Professional contacts were made with biologists who regularly conduct field surveys in the vicinity of the Project Site. Files maintained by biologists preparing this document were checked for additional distributional data Olson, Storrer, files of personal observations). Extensive botanical surveys conducted over several seasons failed to confirm the presence of these other 15 plant species on the Project Site. Although potential habitat exists for these species, none were observed: Brewer’s spineflower (Chorizanthe breweri), San Luis Obispo mariposa lily (Calochortus simulans), San Luis mariposa lily (Calochortus obispoensis), adobe sanicle (Sanicula maritima), Coulter’s goldfields (Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri), caper-fruited tripodocarpum (Tropidocarpum capparideum), Jones’ layia (Layia jonesii), pale-yellow layia Layia heterotricha), marsh sandwort (Arenaria pludicola), round-leaved filaree (Erodium macrophyllum), saline clover (Trifolium depauperatum var. hydrophilum), San Joaquin spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana), Blochman’s dudleya (Dudleya blochmaniae), San Luis Obispo 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR dudleya (Dudleya abramsii ssp. murina), and shining navarretia (Navarretia nigelliformis). Based on the negative results of several botanical field surveys, these species are not expected to occur on the Project Site. Table 4.2-2 lists special status plant species known or with potential to occur at the Project Site. The list is based on field surveys of the Project Site and a CNDDB search completed in 2007 Padre 2009). A more recent CNDDB query was completed for the EIR to update known and potential for occurrence (CNDDB 2010). Figure 4.2-4 shows the geographic distribution of sensitive plant species and plant species of concern occurring in the Project footprint. Congdon’s Tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) Congdon’s tarplant, a California Native Plant Society (CNPS) List 1B species, is a prostrate to erect spiny-herbaceous annual herb in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). This species generally blooms from June to November. It is typically found in alkaline or clay soils associated with seasonally wet valley and foothill grasslands. Congdon’s tarplant is known to occur in the San Francisco Bay area, northern Monterey County, and San Luis Obispo County (County). This species has been found in topographic low areas and swales within wetland habitat on the Project Site. Congdon’s tarplant is the most widespread rare plant species at the Project Site, occupying 25.9 acres (Figure 4.2-4), though these occurrences vary considerably in terms of plant density. Hoover’s Button-celery (Eryngium aristatulum var. hooveri) Hoover’s button-celery is an ascending to erect annual/perennial herb in the carrot family Apiaceae) and is a CNPS List 1B species. This species arises from a taproot and has sharply toothed stem leaves and small white flowers. This species generally blooms in July and typically occurs in vernal pools and low-lying areas within wetland habitat. Hoover’s button-celery is known to occur in Alameda and San Luis Obispo Counties and historically has been collected in San Benito and Santa Clara Counties. This species is very rare in San Luis Obispo County and relatively limited distribution outside the County. On the Project Site, Hoover’s button-celery is found in several small populations near the northern border in the western portion, as well as several small populations on the south parcel (Figure 4.2-4). It occupies only 0.16 acre, most often in association with paulustrine, non-persistent vernal swales, and pools (Padre 2008c). Cambria Morning glory (Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis) Cambria morning glory, a CNPS List 1B species, is a perennial herb in the morning glory family Convolvulaceae) that has trailing or sometimes weakly twining stems. This species typically blooms from April to June and has a cream colored, funnel-shaped flower. Cambria morning glory primarily occurs in grassland and dry open scrub including chaparral and cismontane woodland, and is known to occur only in San Luis Obispo County. This species (Figure 4.2-4) was found to be widespread and abundant throughout annual grassland areas of the Project Site, where it occupied approximately 14.2 acres (Padre 2008c). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Adobe sanicle Sanicula maritima SR, List 1B.1 Meadows and seeps, chaparral, valley and foothill grassland, or coastal prairie associated w/ moist clay or ultramafic soils) [“ultramafic” = containing iron and magnesium, with little or no silica] Valley and foothill grasslands, seasonal wet meadows, and clay soils are present within Project Site; however, species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: 0.6-mile east of U.S. Highway 101 at the end of Margarita Ave. (CNDDB 2010). Arroyo de la Cruz manzanita Arctostaphylos cruzensis List 1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, broadleaved upland forest, closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal scrub and grasslands associated w/sandy soils) Habitat associations and/or soil types do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: Hollister Peak area, approximately 9 miles west-northwest (CNDDB 2010). Beach spectaclepod Dithyrea maritima ST, List 1B.1 Coastal dunes and coastal scrub Coastal dune and coastal scrub habitats do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: Pismo State Beach, 10 miles south (CNDDB 2010). Black-flowered figwort Scrophularia atrata List 1B.2 Closed-coned coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal dunes, riparian scrub usually in sands and diatomaceous shales sand dunes) Riparian scrub habitat present however fragmented and degraded, sandy soils are not present within Project Site, and species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: Price Canyon, approximately four miles southeast CNDDB 2010). Blochman’s dudleya Dudleya blochmaniae ssp. blochmaniae List 1B.1 Coastal scrub and grasslands w/ shallow rocky slopes in clays over serpentine Occurrences correlate closely with rocky serpentine outcrops which occur in northeast corner of Project Site; however, species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: base of Bishop Peak, San Luis Obispo, three miles northwest CNDDB 2010). Blochman’s leafy daisy Erigeron blochmaniae List 1B.2 Coastal dunes. Endemic to San Luis Obispo County Coastal dune habitat does not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location Montana de Oro State Park, 14 miles west CNDDB 2010). Brewer’s spineflower Chorizanthe breweri List 1B.3 Chaparral, coastal scrub, cismontane woodland and closed-coned coniferous forest, associated with serpentine, rocky or gravelly sites Occurrences correlate closely with serpentine outcrops which occur within the northeast corner of Project Site; however, species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: Price Canyon Road, approximately four miles southeast CNDDB 2010). California seablite Suaeda californica FE, List 1B.1 Coastal salt marshes and swamps Coastal salt marshes and swamps are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location southeast shore of Morro Bay, approximately 15 miles west-northwest (CNDDB 2010). 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Caper-fruited tropidocarpum Tropidocarpum capparideum List 1B.1 Valley and foothill grassland, associated with alkaline clay Grassland habitat exists within Project Site; however, species was not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: Pozo Road, southeast of Santa Margarita, approximately 12 miles east-northeast (CNDDB 2010). Carmel Valley bush mallow Malacothamnus palmeri var. involucratus List 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, chaparral Suitable habitat not present within Project Site. Nearest known location at Cerro Alto, between Morro Bay and Atascadero, approximately 20 miles northwest (CNDDB 2010). Chorro Creek bog thistle Cirsium fontinale var. obispoense FE, SE, List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland Habitat associations do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known locations: Miossi Creek, Prefumo Canyon and Laguna Lake, all 2+ miles away (CNDDB 2010). Congdon’s tarplant Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii List 1B.2 Valley and foothill grassland Species known to occur within Project Site; identified during field surveys (Rincon 2003, 2005; CEMC 2007). Coulter’s goldfields Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri List 1B.1 Coastal salt marsh, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools Grasslands and vernal pools occur within Project Site; however, species was not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location is Baywood Park at Sweet Springs marsh, 13 miles west CNDDB 2010). Crisp monardella Monardella crispa List 1B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub Habitat associations are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Hazard Canyon, 16 miles west (CNDDB 2010). Cuesta Pass checkerbloom Sidalcea hickmanii ssp. anomala SR, List 1B.2 Closed-coned coniferous forest Coniferous forests do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: Cuesta Ridge, approximately seven miles north CNDDB 2010). Dacite manzanita Arctostaphylos tomentosa ssp. daciticola List 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland Habitat associations are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Hollister Peak, east of Morro Bay, eight miles west-northwest (CNDDB 2010). Diablo Canyon blue grass Poa diaboli List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, closed-cone coniferous forest Habitat associations are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Ridge south of Coon Creek, 17 miles west CNDDB 2010). Dune larkspur Delphinium parryi ssp. blochmaniae List 1B.2 Maritime chaparral and coastal dunes Maritime chaparral and coastal dune habitat do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: Piney Ridge, southwest of Lopez Mountain, 6 miles southeast (CNDDB 2010). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Dwarf soaproot Chlorogalum pomeridianum var. minus List 1B.2 Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland, associated with serpentine soils Valley and foothill grasslands associated with serpentine soils present within Project Site; however species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: three miles east of San Luis Obispo, southwest of West Corral de Piedra Creek CNDDB 2010). Hardam’s evening primrose Camissonia hardhamiae List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland Suitable habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location east of Santa Margarita, approximately 12 miles northeast (CNDDB 2010). Hoover’s bent grass Agrostis hooveri List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland, associated with sandy soils Sandy soils are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Irish Hills, 12 miles west (CNDDB 2010). Hoover’s button-celery Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri List 1B.1 Vernal pools Species known to occur within Project Site; identified during field surveys (Rincon 2003, 2005; CEMC 2007). Indian Knob mountainbalm Eriodictyon altissimum FE, SE, List 1B.1 Maritime chaparral, cismontane woodland. Endemic to San Luis Obispo County Maritime chaparral and cismontane woodland do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location is at Indian Knob, about 4 miles north of Pismo Beach and 3 miles of San Luis Obispo (CNDDB 2010). Jones’ layia Layia jonesii List 1B.2 Chaparral, valley and foothill grasslands areas w/ clay and serpentine outcrops Grasslands and clay soils and serpentine outcrops are present within Project Site; however, species not observed during surveys. Nearest known location: 1.75 miles southwest of San Luis Obispo (CNDDB 2010). La Graciosa thistle Cirsium loncholepis FE, ST, List 1B.1 Coastal dunes, brackish marshes, riparian scrub Habitat associations are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Laguna Lake County Park, near Madonna Road, 3 miles northwest (CNDDB 2010). Leafy tarplant Deinandra increscens ssp. foliosa List 1B.2 Valley and foothill grassland w/ sandy soils Sandy soils absent in Project Site. Nearest known locations: Arroyo Grande, Pozo Road, more than 10 miles from the Project Site (CNDDB 2010). Marsh sandwort Arenaria paludicola FE, SE, List 1B.1 Marshes and swamps Marsh habitat occurs within Project Site; however, species not observed during surveys. Nearest known location: Pismo Beach, 10 miles south (CNDDB 2010). 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Mesa horkelia Horkelia cuneata ssp. puberula List 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub Habitat associations are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Indian Knob Ridge, 3 miles east of San Luis Obispo (CNDDB 2010). Miles’s milk-vetch Astragalus didymocarpus var. milesianus List 1B.2 Coastal scrub associated with clay soils Coastal scrub does not occur in Project Site. Nearest known location: End of Margarita Ave., San Luis Obispo, about 2 miles from the Project Site (CNDDB 2010). Morro manzanita Arctostaphylos morroensis FT, List 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, associated with Baywood sands Habitat associations do not occur in Project Site. Nearest known location: Prefumo Canyon, about 3 miles from the Project Site CNDDB 2010). Most beautiful jewel-flower Streptanthus albidus ssp. peramoenus FSC, List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grasslands associated with serpentine soils Valley and foothill grasses associated with serpentine soils occur with the Project Site; however, species not found during field surveys. Nearest known location: Brizziolari Canyon, approximately 3 miles north (CNDDB 2010). Obispo Indian paintbrush Castilleja densiflora ssp. obispoensis List 1B.2 Valley and foothill grassland This local variant of a native annual wildflower is widespread within the non-native on the Project Site (Padre 2008c). Taxonomy is unclear and distinguishing the local endemic from the common and widespread taxon is difficult. Oso manzanita Arctostaphylos osoensis List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, narrowly endemic to mountains north of Los Osos Valley, San Luis Obispo County Chaparral and cismontane woodland do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: northwest slope of Hollister Peak, eight miles west-southwest (CNDDB 2010). Pale-yellow layia Layia heterotricha List 1B.1 Cismontane woodland, pinyon-juniper woodland, valley and foothill grassland, associated with alkaline or clay soils Potential habitat present within Project Site; however, species not identified during field surveys. Nearest known location: Hwy 58 at the Salinas River Bridge, Calf Canyon, more than 20miles away (CNDDB 2010). Pecho manzanita Arctostaphylos pechoensis List 1B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal scrub. Narrowly endemic to coastal mountains of San Luis Obispo County. Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, and coastal scrub do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: hills and ridges above upper Coon Creek and head of See Canyon, San Luis Canyon, more than 3 miles from the Project Site (CNDDB 2010). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Pismo clarkia Clarkia speciosa ssp. immaculata FE, SR, List 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, and grasslands, associated with sandy soils Typically associates with oak woodland and on sandy soils which do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: Price Canyon approximately 4 miles southeast (CNDDB 2010). Rayless ragwort Senecio aphanactis List 2.2 Coastal scrub, cismontane woodland Habitat associations not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: San Luis Obispo, hill near cemetery, more than two miles away (CNDDB 2010). Round-leaved filaree California macrophylla List 1B.1 Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland, associated with clay soils Potential habitat exists within Project Site; however, species not observed during field surveys (CNDDB 2010). Saline clover Trifolium depauperatum var. hydrophilum List 1B.2 Marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools Potential habitat present within Project Site; however, not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location in Laguna Lake Park, San Luis Obispo, 3 miles northwest CNDDB 2010). Salt marsh bird’s-beak Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimms FE, SE, List 1B.2 Coastal salt marsh, coastal dunes Coastal salt marsh and coastal dune habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location at Sweet Springs marsh at south end of Morro Bay, 13 miles west (CNDDB 2010). San Benito fritillary Fritillaria viridea List 1B.2 Chaparral associated with serpentine slopes Habitat associations do not occur within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Prefumo Canyon, about three miles from the Project Site (CNDDB 2010). San Joaquin spearscale Atriplex joaquiniana List 1B.2 Chenopod scrub, alkali meadow, valley and foothill grassland, associated with seasonal alkali wetlands or alkali sink scrub Grassland and seasonal wetland meadow habitat present within the Project Site; however, highly degraded. Species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: Near Morro Bay, 11 miles west-northwest (CNDDB 2010). San Luis mariposa lily Calochortus obispoensis List 1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, and grasslands, often in serpentine Occurrences correlate closely with serpentine outcrops which occur in the northeast corner of Project Site; however species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: Ridge at intersection of Broad St. and Orcutt St., more than two miles away (CNDDB 2010). San Luis Obispo County lupine Lupinus ludovicianus List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland in sandstone or sandy soils Chaparral and/or cismontane woodland do not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: Price Canyon approximately four miles southeast (CNDDB 2010). 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Cambria morning glory Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis List 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, and grassland Species is known to occur within Project Site. Observed during field surveys (Rincon 2003, 2005; CEMC 2007). San Luis Obispo dudleya Dudleya abramsii ssp. murina List 1B.3 Coastal scrub, grasslands, on rocky barren exposures of serpentine Occurrences correlate closely with serpentine outcrops which occur in the northeast corner of the Project Site. Nearest known location: North of Project Site at base of South Hills (Rincon 2000). San Luis Obispo mariposa lily Calochortus simulans List 1B.3 Valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland, chaparral, associated with decomposed granite and serpentine clay soils Valley and foothill grasslands occur within Project Site; however, species was not observed during surveys. Nearest known location: End of Margarita Ave., San Luis Obispo, about 2 miles from the Project Site (CNDDB 2010). San Luis Obispo monardella Monardella frutescens List 1B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub Coastal dune and scrub habitat does not occur within Project Site. Nearest known location: South of Morro Bay, 12 miles west (CNDDB 2010). San Luis Obispo sedge Carex obispoensis List 1B.2 Closed-coned forest, chaparral, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grasslands Grasslands present within Project Site; however, highly degraded. Species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: approximately 7 miles north Ridge (CNDDB 2010). San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya Dudleya abramsii ssp. bettinae List 1B.2 Coastal scrub, grasslands, and chaparral; barren exposures of serpentine Believed to occur on serpentine outcrops within the northeast corner of Project Site, confirmation needed (CEMC 2010). Nearest known location: O’Connor Way, San Luis Obispo, 5 miles northwest (CNDDB 2010). Santa Lucia bush mallow Malacothamnus palmeri var. palmeri List 1B.2 Chaparral Chaparral habitat is not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Highway 41, northwest of Cerro Alto, about 20 miles northwest (CNDDB 2010). Santa Lucia manzanita Arctostaphylos luciana List 1B.2 Chaparral Chaparral habitat does not occur within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Northeast of Slide Hill, east of San Luis Obispo CNDDB 2010). Santa Margarita manzanita Arctostaphylos pilosula List 1B.2 Closed-coned coniferous forest, chaparral Closed-coned coniferous forest and chaparral is not present within Project Site. Nearest known location in vicinity of Indian Knob, about 3.5 miles north-northwest of Pismo Beach, South of San Luis Obispo (CNDDB 2010). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-2 Regional Plant Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Shining navarretia Navarretia nigelliformis ssp. radians List 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools, Suitable habitat exists within Project Site; however, species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: Rocky Canyon Road, Creston, more than 15 miles away (CNDDB 2010). Splitting yarn lichen Sulcaria isidiifera S1.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland Chaparral and cismontane woodland habitat does not occur within in Project Site. Nearest known location: North of town of Baywood and South of Morro Bay State Park, about 12 miles west (CNDDB 2010) Straight-awned spineflower Chorizanthe rectispina List 1B.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub Habitat associations are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Carpenter Canyon, about four miles southeast CNDDB 2010). Surf thistle Cirsium rhothophilum ST, List 1B.2 Coastal dunes Coastal dune habitat does not occur in Project Site. Nearest known location: Pismo Beach, 10 miles south (CNDDB 2010). Wells’s manzanita Arctostaphylos wellsii List 1B.1 Chaparral, closed-cone coniferous forest Habitat associations do not occur in Project Site. Nearest known location: Price Canyon, approximately four miles southeast CNDDB, 2010). Yellow-flowered eriastrum Eriastrum luteum List 1B.2 Broadleaved upland forest, cismontane woodland, chaparral Habitat associations do not occur in Project Site. Nearest known location: Creston Road, Santa Margarita, more than 20 miles northeast (CNDDB 2010). Notes: Species arranges alphabetically by common name Status Codes: FE Federal Endangered (United States Fish and Wildlife Service) FT Federal Threatened (United States Fish and Wildlife Service) List 1B Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California (California Native Plant Society) 0.1 Seriously endangered in California, 0.2 Fairly endangered in California, 0.3 Not very endangered in California List 2 Rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere. SE State Endangered (California Department of Fish & Wildlife) SR State Rare (California Department of Fish & Wildlife) ST State Threatened (California Department of Fish & Wildlife) P Habitat Present A Habitat Absent 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.2-4 – Geographic Distribution of Plant Species of Concern Source: Padre WSP 2008c 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR San Luis Obispo Owl’s Clover (Castilleja densiflora ssp. obispoensis) San Obispo owl’s clover is a CNPS list 1B species. This annual herb in the figwort family Scrophulariaceae) has white to pale yellow flowers and typically blooms from March through June. This species generally occurs in valley and foothill grasslands, meadows, and seeps, often associated with serpentine soils. San Obispo owl’s clover is endemic to San Luis Obispo County. At the Project Site, this rare species is widespread in the non-native grassland plant communities, occupying 10.6 acres (Figure 4.2-4), (Padre 2008c). However, color forms that key to both the widespread taxon and the local endemic were found during field surveys and in many cases, it is not always possible to distinguish between the two (Padre 2008c). San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya (Dudleya abramsii ssp. bettinae) San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya is a perennial herb in the stonecrop family (Crassulaceae). This species has fleshy leaves, pale-yellow, purple-tinged flowers, and typically blooms from May through July. This species occurs on rock outcrops in serpentine grasslands and was observed on the rock outcrop in the northeastern corner of the Project Site (CEMC 2007). This species is described in Padre 2008c as being one of the most restricted rare plant species that was observed during site surveys, occupying only 0.04-acre of the Project site Padre 2008c. Purple Needlegrass (Nassella pulchra) Purple needlegrass is a perennial bunchgrass widespread in California west of the Sierra Nevada crest. It is one of four species of needlegrass in the state, three of which are native. Because of its large geographic distribution, purple needlegrass often is a dominant, co-dominant, or subdominant in many grassland and shrubland plant communities (see CDFW 2003 for further listings). At the Project Site, purple needlegrass is primarily found in the far northeastern portion of the site in association with the ultramafic outcrop and derivative soils (ultramafic contains iron and magnesium, with little or no silica). Smaller populations are found in the southern portion of the north parcel near Tank Farm Road (Figure 4.2-4). Purple needlegrass grassland occupies 11.5 acres at the Project Site. California Walnut (Juglans californica Wats.) The southern California walnut is a deciduous tree or shrub with separate female and male inflorescences. As a tree, it maintains a single trunk less than 25 m in height; however, it can also take the form of a shrub with up to five trunks. According to the CNPS, southern California walnut is on the watch list (i.e., List 4.2, species with a limited distribution in the state). It is further classified as 0.2, which is fairly endangered in California. CNPS states that the walnut forest is a “much fragmented, rare, and declining vegetation community.” It is known to be threatened by urbanization, grazing, invasion by non-native plants, and possibly a decline in natural recruitment processes. A further, but not well-documented, threat is the possibly hybridization with the cultivated non-native walnuts (e.g., Juglans regia). Several stands of southern California walnut are found at the Project Site, along the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek (Padre 2008c) (Figure 4.2-4). These are small stands consisting of mature, mostly multi- stemmed specimens with a non-native annual grassland understory. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2.1.9 Regional Wildlife Species of Concern The following species accounts briefly present ecological and range information and legal status for those special-status animal species known to occur, or with potential to occur at the Project Site. Potential for occurrence is based on the presence of suitable habitat and known occurrences in the vicinity of the Project Site. These conclusions are supported by CNDDB 2010 query results and review of reported occurrences from other environmental documents and range maps, in addition to results of surveys conducted on the Project Site. The nine USGS quads queried for CNDDB information are listed in Section 4.2.1.8, Regional Plant Species of Concern . Information regarding known and potential occurrences in the vicinity was supplemented by additional sources, including regional wildlife guides and checklists, such as The Birds of San Luis Obispo County, California (Edell 1996) and The Birds of Santa Barbara County, California Lehman 1994); contacts with other biologists who conduct field surveys in the vicinity; and files maintained by the biologists who prepared this document (Olson, Storrer, personal observations). Table 4.2-3 defines wildlife species of concern in the context of this analysis. Table 4.2-3 Definitions of Wildlife Species of Concern Wildlife Species of Concern Animals listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act 50 CFR 17.11 for listed animals and various notices in the Federal Register for proposed species). Animals that are candidates for possible future listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (Federal Register Vol. 62, No. 182, pp. 49397-49411, September 19, 1997). Animals that meet the definitions of rare or endangered species under the CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15380). Animals listed or proposed for listing by the State of California as threatened and endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (14 CCR 670.5). Animal species of special concern to the CDFW (Remsen 1978 for birds; Williams 1986 for mammals; Moyle et al. 1989 for fish; and Jennings and Hayes 1994 for amphibians and reptiles). Animal species that are fully protected in California (California Fish and Game Code, Section 3511 [birds], 4700 [mammals], and 5050 [reptiles and amphibians]). Table 4.2-4 lists special status wildlife species known or with potential to occur at the Project Site. The list was compiled based on field surveys of the Project Site and CNDDB search completed in 2007 (CEMC 2007). A more recent CNDDB query was completed for the EIR to update known and potential for occurrence (CNDDB 2010). Invertebrates California Linderiella (Linderiella occidentalis), Longhorn Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta longiantenna), and Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) These three fairy shrimp are aquatic species in the family Branchinectidae. All three have delicate elongate bodies, large stalked compound eyes, no carapaces, and 11 pairs of swimming legs. Fairy shrimp are known to occur in neutral to slightly alkaline vernal pools throughout the California Central Valley and in rock outcrop and vernal pools along the Interior Coast Ranges, south of the Sacramento River Delta. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-4 Regional Wildlife Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Invertebrates Monarch butterfly overwintering) Danaus plexippus SA Sheltered stands of both native and non-native trees including Eucalyptus and oak groves, Dense, sheltered stands of Eucalyptus and oak groves are not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Prefumo Creek, south of Madonna Road, San Luis Obispo, about 3 miles from the Project Site CNDDB 2010) Morro Bay blue butterfly Plebejus icarioides moroensis SA Stabilized dunes, coastal areas Suitable habitat is not present within Project Site. Nearest known location: Morro Bay, 12 miles west northwest (CNDDB 2010) Morro shoulderband snail Helminthoglypta walkeriana FE Coastal dune and coastal scrub Habitat associations do not occur within the Project Site. Nearest known occurrence: Elfin Forest, Los Osos Baywood Park (CNDDB 2010), 10 miles west. California linderiella Linderiella occidentalis SA Vernal pools and other seasonally inundated features Vernal pools are present within the Project Site; and California linderiella is known to occur on the Project Site (Rincon 2005; Padre 2012a) Vernal pool fairy shrimp Branchinecta lynchi FT Vernal pools and other seasonally inundated features Species known to occur within the Project Site (Rincon 2003, 2012a) Longhorn fairy shrimp Branchinecta longiantenna FE Vernal pools and other seasonally inundated features Vernal pools are present within Project Site; however, species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location: Soda Lake, more than 45 miles northeast (Rincon 2003) Sandy beach tiger beetle Cicindela hirticollis gravida SA Sandy areas adjacent to brackish-water Suitable habitat is not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Morro Strand Beach, about 12 miles west-northwest (CNDDB 2010) Globose dune beetle Coelus globosus SA Coastal sand dunes Suitable habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: three miles north of Pt. Buchon (CNDDB 2010) Atascadero june beetle Polyphylla nubila SA Sand dunes Suitable habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: San Luis Obispo, location unknown (CNDDB 2010) San Luis Obispo pyrg Pyrgulopsis taylori SA Freshwater habitats Potential habitat exists in the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek along eastern side of the project Site. Nearest known location: San Luis Obispo Creek, Cuesta Pass approximately 7 miles north (CNDDB 2010) Mimic tyronia (California brackish water snail) Tyronia imitator SA Coastal lagoons, estuaries, salt marshes Suitable habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Los Osos Creek marsh,12 miles west (CNDDB 2010) 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-4 Regional Wildlife Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Fish South-central Calif. coast steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus FT Coastal streams Potential habitat present within adjacent East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek during high flow periods. Nearest known location: Acacia Creek at Tank Farm Road (F. Otte, City of San Luis Obispo Biologist, personal communication, 9/25/07). Tidewater goby Eucyclogobius newberryi FE, CSC Brackish water habitats Suitable habitat is not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location; San Luis Obispo Creek, 2.5 miles upstream from creek mouth CNDDB 2010). Reptiles Black legless lizard Anniella pulchra nigra CSC Sand dunes and sandy soils Habitat associations absent from the Project Site. Nearest known location suppressed by CDFW (CNDDB 2010) Silvery legless lizard Anniella pulchra pulchra CSC Sandy soils, sparse vegetation Habitat associations absent from the Project Site. Nearest known location: Cuesta College and Camp San Luis Obispo, six miles from the Project Site (CNDDB 2010) Coast (California) horned lizard Phrynosoma coronatum frontale CSC Most common in lowlands along sandy washes with scattered low bushes Species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location is El Chorro Regional Park, six miles from the Project Site (CNDDB 2010) Southwestern pond turtle Actinemys marmorata CSC Vegetated ponds and slow moving streams with deep pools present Riparian habitat present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Observed in Acacia Creek west of the Project Site (Rincon 2000; EXTRIX 1998) Two -striped garter snake Thamnophis hammondii CSC Riverine wetlands Potential habitat present; however, habitat is fragmented and degraded. Species not observed during field surveys. Nearest recorded location at Santa Rosa Creek, south side of Hwy 41, 4.5 miles NE of Cambria CNDDB 2010) Amphibians California red-legged frog Rana draytonii FT, CSC Riparian vegetation associated with slow moving water Potential habitat present; however, fragmented and degraded. Protocol level surveys for CRLF were negative (Padre 2008d). One-day, one- night, dry season survey in July 2012 was negative (Padre August 2012b). Nearest known locations; tributaries to San Luis Obispo Creek northeast of Project Site (CNDDB 2010) Western spadefoot toad Spea hammondii CSC Grassland habitats, or valley-foothill hardwood woodland, associated with vernal pools Potential habitat present within the Project Site; however, species not observed during field surveys. Nearest known location; northeast of Santa Margarita, more than 15 miles northeast (CNDDB 2010) 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-4 Regional Wildlife Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site California tiger salamander Ambystoma californiense FT, CSC Seasonal water sources for breeding Seasonal wetlands present; however, disturbed and degraded. Species not observed during field surveys. Habitat assessment concluded occurrence likely precluded by several factors (Rincon 2003a). Nearest known location; one mile north of San Luis Obispo (CNDDB 2010) Coast range newt Taricha torosa torosa CSC Coastal drainages Suitable habitat not present within the Project Site. Further, species not observed during surveys. Nearest known location is within unnamed tributary to Santa Margarita Creek, five miles north-northeast of San Luis Obispo (CNDDB 2010). Birds Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos CSC nesting and wintering), Mountainous, hilly terrain, and open fields Observed within the Project Site during field surveys (CEMC 2007). Uncommon transient while foraging. Northern harrier Circus cyaneus CSC nesting), M Wetlands and open fields Observed within the Project Site during field surveys in winter spring of 2003-04 (Rincon 2004). Winter visitor while foraging. Cooper's hawk Accipiter cooperi CSC nesting), M Riparian forest Observed within the Project Site during field surveys in fall/winter of 2003-04 (Rincon 2004). Likely present year-round; possible breeder. Ferruginous hawk Buteo regalis CSC wintering), M Grasslands Observed within the Project Site during field surveys in November 2003 Rincon 2004). Uncommon transient and winter visitor. Sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus CSC nesting), M Mixed woodlands Observed within the Project Site during field surveys in winter of 2004 Rincon 2004). Uncommon winter visitor. White-tailed kite Elanus leucurus FP, M Oak woodland, open grasslands, meadows, Observed within the Project Site during field surveys in winter and early spring of 2003-04 (Rincon 2004). Year-round resident; possible breeder. American peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus anatum SE nesting), FP, M Potentially present in all habitats. Observed within the Project Site in April 2003 (Rincon 2004). Expected as a rare transient while foraging. Nearest known breeding locations within Price Canyon and Morro Bay (CNDDB 2010). Prairie falcon Falco mexicanus CSC nesting), M Dry, open terrain Open grassland habitat present within the Project Site. Location information suppressed (CNDDB 2010). Rare transient. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-4 Regional Wildlife Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Burrowing owl (burrow sites) Athene cunicularia CSC, M Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands Observed within the Project Site during winter of 2008 (Padre 2008e). Other known occurrence: two miles east-northeast of Cuesta College, Camp San Luis Obispo (CNDDB 2010). Winter visitor; nesting possible, but not confirmed through focused field surveys in spring of 2008 (Padre 2008e). Grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum CSC nesting), M Dense grasslands on rolling hills, lowland plains, valley and lower mountain slopes Grasslands are present within the Project Site, however, highly degraded and grazed by cattle. Possible spring/summer resident, though not observed on site during field surveys. Nearest known location: Santa Margarita Ranch, more than 10 miles northeast (CNDDB 2010). California black rail Laterallus jamaicensis ST, FP, M Marshes, swamps, meadows Marsh habitat present in the Project Site. Species not observed at the Project Site during focused surveys in May of 2003 (Rincon 2004). California clapper rail Rallus longirostris obsoletus FE, SE, FP, M Salt-water and brackish marshes Suitable habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Morro Bay, approximately 11 miles west-northwest (CNDDB 2010). Not expected to occur. Western snowy plover Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus FT nesting), CSC nesting), M Sandy beaches, salt pond levees and shores of large alkali lakes Suitable habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Pismo State Beach, 10 miles south (CNDDB 2010). Not expected to occur. California horned lark Eremophila alpestris actia CSC, M Grasslands, meadows, alkali flats Observed within the Project Site during field surveys in winter/spring of 2003-04 (Rincon 2004) and May of 2003 (Rincon 2003a). Year-round resident and probable breeder. Loggerhead shrike Lanius ludovicianus CSC nesting), M Open grassland; brushy areas Observed within the Project Site during field surveys in fall, winter, and early spring of 2003-04 (Rincon 2004). Winter visitor. Purple martin Progne subis CSC nesting), M Woodlands, low elevation coniferous forest Suitable nesting habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Trout Creek, west of Pozo Road (CNDDB 2010), more than 10 miles from the Project Site. Rare transient. Tricolored blackbird Agelaius tricolor CSC nesting colony), M Open water, wetlands Seasonal wetlands are present within the Project Site. Observed during 2007 Padre field surveys. Transient and possible breeder. Nearest known location: Chorro Reservoir, Camp San Luis Obispo, six miles west CNDDB 2010). Western yellow-billed cuckoo Coccyzus americanus occidentalis SE nesting) M Riparian forest Mixed riparian habitat present within the Project Site, however, fragmented and degraded. Rare transient. Nearest known location: San Luis Obispo 1921, believed to be extirpated from site (CNDDB 2010). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-4 Regional Wildlife Species of Concern Common Name Scientific Name Status General Habitat Associations Known/Potential Occurrence at the Project Site Mammals American badger Taxidea taxus CSC Shrub, forest and herbaceous habitats with friable soils Suitable habitat is present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Price Canyon, four miles southeast (CNDDB 2010). San Diego desert woodrat Neotoma lepida CSC Moderate to dense vegetation with canopy cover, particularly abundant in rock outcrops and rocky cliffs Habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: PG&E’s Pt. Buchon property immediately south of Montana de Oro State Park, approximately 15 miles west (CNDDB 2010, Olson personal observations 2010). Morro Bay kangaroo rat Dipodomys heermanni morroensis FE, SE, FP Coastal sage scrub on south side of Morro Bay Suitable habitat is not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Los Osos Creek, more than 12 miles west (CNDDB 2010). Townsend’s big-eared bat Corynorhinus townsendii CSC Roosts in open hanging from walls, ceilings, common in mesic sites Suitable habitat is not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: unknown (CNDDB 2010). Pallid bat Antrozous pallidus CSC Deserts, grasslands, shrublands, forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting Suitable roosting habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Within under-city tunnel at Marsh and Chorro streets, three miles north (CNDDB 2010). Big free-tailed bat Nyctinomops macrotis CSC High cliffs and rocky outcrops for roosting Suitable roosting habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location: Morro Bay State Park, 12 miles west-northwest CNDDB 2010). Western mastiff bat Eumops perotis californicus CSC Roosts in cliff faces, high buildings, trees, tunnels Suitable roosting habitat not present within the Project Site. Nearest known location unknown (CNDDB 2010). Notes: Species listed alphabetically by common name Status Codes: CSC California Species of Special Concern (CDFW) FSC Federal Species of Concern FP Fully protected under Section 4700 of the California Fish and Game Code FE Federal Endangered (USFWS) FT Federal Threatened (USFWS) SA Special Animal (CDFW) FP Protected under the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 5, Sections 41 and 42 SE State Endangered (CDFW) M Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 ST State Threatened (CDFW) A/P General Habitat Absent/Present 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Project Site has been the subject of wet and dry season fairy shrimp presence/absence survey protocol, conducted by Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon), over a 3-year period from 2003 through 2005. A total of 86 seasonal wetland features were identified and surveyed to determine if the federally threatened vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi [VPFS]) occur using dry season sampling, wet season sampling, or both wet and dry season survey efforts. As a result of completing the wet/dry season survey protocol, 60 of the 86 pools sampled have either recorded positive identification of or are assumed to support the species based on observed hydrological connectivity to occupied pools (Rincon 2005). Three “potential pool locations” totaling less than approximately 0.25 acres) were identified in the northeast portion of the Project Site during the Padre 2012 October surveys (Padre 2013). These potential pools are not included in Figures 4.2-2 or the final wetland acreage. These areas did not contain water during the time of the surveys and were not formally delineated. Final acreages will be finalized prior to any site disturbances.Additional surveys were conducted by Padre biologists during the 2011/2012 wet season within previously unoccupied habitat areas in order to evaluate the current occupancy of suitable habitat. These surveys resulted in observations of VPFS in five additional locations that were previously considered to be unoccupied habitat (Padre 2012a). The surveys identified an additional 0.8-acre of VPFS occupied habitat for a total of 32.6 acres of VPFS occupied habitat on the Project Site. California linderiella, on the CDFW “Special Animals” list, , tend to live in large, fairly clear vernal pools and lakes. They have been found in very small pools and are tolerant of water temperatures from 41 to 85° F, making them the most tolerant fairy shrimp of the three species USFWS 2003b). California linderiella were observed during fairy shrimp surveys and are known to occur within the Project Site. Longhorn fairy shrimp, a federally endangered species, tend to inhabit clear to rather turbid vernal pools. The longhorn fairy shrimp is known only from disjunct populations along the eastern margin of the central Coast Range from Concord to Contra Costa County south to Soda Lake in San Luis Obispo County (USFWS 2003). Regionally, they have been found in clear-water depressions in claypan pools around Soda Lake, San Luis Obispo County. Longhorn fairy shrimp were not detected during fairy shrimp surveys and therefore are not expected to occur within the Project Site. San Luis Obispo Pyrg (Pyrgulopsis taylori) The San Luis Obispo pyrg is a tiny gastropod that exists in freshwater habitats San Luis Obispo County. Pyrgulopsis species (i.e., springsnails or pyrgs) live in springs and other permanent waters that are poorly integrated on arid western landscapes. Pyrgulopsis spp. are gill-breathing animals that have an entirely aquatic life cycle. It is assumed that most species of this genus are restricted to a single spring, spring complex, or local watershed due to their direct mode of development (i.e., lack of a free swimming dispersal phase) (Rocky Mountain Center for Conservation Genetics and Systematics 2007). San Luis Obispo pyrg has been identified in San Luis Obispo Creek, near Cuesta Pass; however, due to the lack of permanent waters within the Project Site or adjacent Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek the potential for San Luis Obispo pyrg to occur is considered low. The species was not detected at the Project Site during extensive wet and dry season surveys for invertebrate fauna in 2003 (Rincon 2003a, 2003b) or in subsequent Padre protocol surveys of the entire area in 2011 and 2012 (Padre 2012a). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Fish South-central California Coast Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus) Steelhead are an anadromous form of rainbow trout that reproduce in freshwater, but spend much of their life cycle in the ocean, where increased prey density provides a greater growth rate and size. Steelhead have been divided into 15 evolutionary significant units (ESU) based on similarity in life history, location, and genetic markers. The south-central California coast ESU includes all naturally spawned populations of steelhead (and their progeny) in streams including and from the Pajaro River to, but not including, the Santa Maria River, California (NOAA Fisheries 2000). The south-central California coast ESU was listed as threatened by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries on August 18, 1997. Both Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek are tributaries to San Luis Obispo Creek which is historically known to contain steelhead. In addition, steelhead have been observed within Acacia Creek directly upstream of the Project Site during the culvert replacement along Tank Farm Road in 2003 (F. Otte, City of San Luis Obispo Biologist, personal communication, 9/25/07). Based on previous occurrences and connectivity to San Luis Obispo Creek, potential exists for steelhead periodically to transit Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek for the purposes of spawning upstream during periods of heavy stream flow. Amphibians California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii) The California red-legged frog (CRLF) is a federally listed threatened species and a California species of special concern (Jennings and Hayes 1994, CNDDB 2010). The CNDDB has numerous records of occurrences of the CRLF within both a 5-mile and 10-mile radius of the Project Site; most occurrences were recorded within the last five years. These occurrences are mostly to the north of the site in tributaries of San Luis Obispo Creek, and significantly downstream of the site, near Avila Beach. In addition, the Project Site is within the current and historic range of the species. Furthermore, the fragmented woody riparian cover and perennial aquatic habitat of the east fork of San Luis Obispo Creek, although discontinuous and degraded, does provide suitable habitat for the CRLF. USFWS (1997) protocol level CRLF surveys (i.e., two daytime and two nighttime surveys) were conducted by Rincon within suitable habitat areas within the Project Site including seasonally ponded areas, along Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek in May 2003. No CRLF were observed during these surveys and mostly adult and juvenile northern Pacific treefrogs and bullfrogs were observed within the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. In addition, no CRLF were observed during surveys conducted by EXTRIX in 1998 within the Project Site. Furthermore, CRLF surveys were conducted in Acacia Creek by Rincon in July 2000 (Rincon 2000). No CRLF were observed during these surveys and an abundance of adult and juvenile bullfrogs were observed within Acacia Creek. CRLF surveys conducted in Acacia Creek upstream of Project Site (i.e., Damon-Garcia Sports Complex) and in the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek downstream of Project Site (i.e., San Luis Obispo Land Conservancy Filiponi Wetlands) revealed abundant bullfrogs and no CRLF (Rincon 2003). The potential for CRLF to occur in the portions of the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and Acacia Creek adjacent to Project Site or in the seasonally ponded areas that exist within the Project Site is considered low 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR based on the previous surveys of the Project Site and adjacent areas, and the abundance of bullfrog tadpoles and adults within the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and Acacia Creek. The CRLF survey guidelines were revised in August of 2005 (USFWS 2005) to require more surveys at greater intervals than were done in 2003. Subsequent surveys conforming to the revised protocols were performed by Padre Associates in spring of 2008. These consisted of both non-breeding (one day and one nighttime) and breeding season (two day and four nighttime) surveys. The results of those surveys were also negative (Padre 2008d). Padre also conducted a one day, one night dry-season survey and habitat assessment for this species in July 2012; the results of those surveys were also negative (Padre 2012b) for this species. California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense) The Central California tiger salamander (CTS) is a federally threatened species and a California species of concern (Jennings and Hayes 1994, CNDDB 2010). This amphibious species typically spends most of its time in upland habitat within the burrow systems of ground squirrels, pocket gophers, and other burrowing rodents. They emerge from these retreats at night during rain events between late autumn through early spring and travel to breeding pools which are generally ephemeral (vernal). Use of permanent aquatic sites as breeding habitat is unlikely unless these features lack predators such as introduced fish and bullfrogs. A search and analysis of habitat for CTS (non-USFWS protocol surveys) within the Project Site was conducted by Rincon and herpetologist expert Larry Hunt, PhD., of Hunt and Associates Biological Consulting Services, in May 2003. CTS were not observed during these surveys; however, suitable upland and breeding habitat (seasonal pools) for CTS exists within the Project Site (Rincon, Phase I, 2003). Based on the absence of CTS during the field surveys, historic absence of the species from the site, known range of CTS, and abundance of predators (e.g., bullfrogs, carp) in the immediate area, CTS is not expected to occur within the Project Site. Western Spadefoot Toad (Spea hammondii) Western spadefoot toad is a California species of concern (Jennings and Hayes 1994, CNDDB 2010) that typically inhabits grasslands, scrub, chaparral, or valley-foothill hardwood woodlands. The western spadefoot toad is almost entirely terrestrial, however, it uses temporary pools for breeding. Historically, the western spadefoot toad ranged from Redding to northwestern Baja California. In California, the species was found throughout the Central Valley, and in the Coast Ranges and coastal lowlands from San Francisco Bay to Mexico. Suitable upland and breeding habitat (e.g., grasslands, vernal pools) exist within the Project Site; however, no western spadefoot toads have been detected during field surveys (Rincon 2003) or in subsequent Padre surveys of the entire area in 2008 and 2012 (Padre 2008d and 2012b).. Reptiles Western Pond Turtle (Clemmys marmorata) The southwestern pond turtle is a federal species of concern and a California species of special concern (Jennings and Hayes 2004). It is an aquatic turtle inhabiting streams, marshes, ponds, and irrigation ditches within woodland, grassland, and open forest communities. However, it requires upland sites for nesting and over-wintering. Stream habitat must contain large, deep pool areas (6 feet) with moderate-to-good plant and debris cover, and rock and cobble substrates for escape retreats. Southwestern pond turtles were observed in the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and in the perennial ponds located in the southwestern corner of the Project Site in May 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2003 (Rincon, Phase I, 2003). In addition, southwestern pond turtles have been reported in upper reaches of Acacia and Orcutt creeks northeast of the Project Site (Rincon, 2000). Since pond turtles were observed upstream, within the creek channel, and in ponded areas in Project Site, overland movement of pond turtles between ponds and throughout upland areas during the nesting season within the Project area and occurrence of pond turtles within the creek channel is considered likely. Two-striped Garter Snake (Thamnophis hammondii) The two-striped garter snake is a California species of concern. It is an aquatic snake inhabiting perennial and intermittent streams with rocky beds bordered by willow thickets or other dense riparian vegetation. This species of snake uses small mammal burrows as over-wintering sites Jennings 1994). It occurs historically and currently throughout southern California streams. No two-striped garter snakes were observed during the various field surveys conducted at the Project Site (Rincon 2003, Padre 2008d, Padre 2012b). Additionally, the likelihood of occurrence within the Project area is considered low due to only marginally suitable and isolated habitat being present in Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Birds Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) The Burrowing Owl Survey Report prepared for the Project describes the results of surveys for western burrowing owl conducted in 2008 (Padre 2008e). The report makes the following observations and conclusions regarding status of this species at the Project Site. The western burrowing owl is listed as a Species of Management Concern by USFWS, a California Species of Special Concern by CDFW, and is also a migratory bird species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA). The western burrowing owl primarily occurs within extensive grassland habitats and agricultural areas, and it frequently occupies California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi) burrows (Zeiner et al. 1990). A characteristic trait of the western burrowing owl is its diurnal activity patterns and use of existing underground small mammal burrows or crevices, which offer the owls protection, shelter, and nesting sites. The western burrowing owl is documented as an uncommon to common permanent resident of the interior valleys and plains of San Luis Obispo County, and an uncommon winter visitor to the coastal regions of the County (Shuford and Gardali 2008). In summary, the Project Site contains optimal burrowing owl habitat consisting of low-lying grassland frequently grazed by cattle with a high concentration of ground squirrel burrows. During the Wintering Season Surveys, burrowing owls were observed within the Project Site; but were not observed during the spring nesting season. Results of the Nesting Burrowing Owl Survey conclude that burrowing owls were not utilizing the Project Site for purposes of nesting during their peak nesting period between April 15 and July 15 of 2008. However, because the Project Site consists of low-lying grassland habitat with a high concentration of potential owl burrows and burrowing owls have been observed in the area, the Project Site contains suitable habitat to support burrowing owls year-round. Although considered unlikely, western burrowing owls may potentially utilize the Project Site for the purposes of nesting due to the presence of suitable habitat. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis) The California black rail is listed as a threatened species under the California Endangered Species Act. It is also covered as a “fully protected” species under the California Fish and Game Code. The California black rail is now considered a casual visitor to the coastal regions of Southern California, where it formerly bred (Garret and Dunn 1981). A resident population at Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo County, may represent the southernmost extant coastal breeding locale (Eddleman et al. 1994). California black rails inhabit saltwater, brackish, and freshwater marshes. Away from coastal estuaries and salt marshes, black rails are restricted to breeding in freshwater marshes with stands of tule, cattail, bulrush, and sedge (Carex spp.). There is suitable nesting and foraging habitat in the southwestern and northern portions of the Project Site.) There is record of California black rail having been heard vocalizing during surveys of the Project Site in 1996 (CEMC 2008). A single daytime and three nighttime surveys for California black rail were conducted by Rincon Consultants in May of 2003 with negative results (Rincon 2003a). This species has not been reported as being seen or heard during repeated site visits conducted by Padre biologists from 2008 through 2012 (Padre 2008a-e, 2012a, Padre 2012b). Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor) The tri-colored blackbird is a Priority 1 Species of Special Concern (breeding) according to the CDFW (Shuford and Gardali 2008). The species is a permanent but local resident of California, where it establishes breeding colonies in freshwater marsh habitat dominated by cattail and/or tule. The species makes extensive migrations outside the breeding season and the focus of protection is on nesting colonies. There is suitable nesting and foraging habitat in the southwestern and northern portions of the Project Site. Tri-colored blackbirds were observed within the Project Site during surveys conducted in spring and summer of 2007 (CEMC 2007). The tri-colored blackbird should be considered a potential breeder on the basis of suitable habitat documented presence during the breeding season. California Horned Lark (Eremophila alpestris actia) The California horned lark is included in the CDFW List of Special Animals (CDFW 2009). The species is most typical of open grassland habitats with low, sparse vegetation. California horned larks were observed within the Project Site during surveys conducted by Padre (CEMC 2007) in spring and summer of 2007. The species should be considered a potential breeder on the basis of suitable habitat and documented presence during the breeding season. Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) Mainland populations of the loggerhead shrike are considered a Priority 2 Species of Special Concern (breeding) by the CDFW (Shuford and Gardali 2008). This species is typical of open grassland and sparse scrub habitats. It is more widespread during the non-breeding season, when local populations are augmented by northern migrants. Loggerhead shrikes were observed within the Project Site during surveys conducted by Padre (CEMC 2007) in spring and summer of 2007. The species should be considered a winter visitor and potential breeder on the basis of suitable habitat and documented presence during the breeding season. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Birds of Prey The Cooper’s hawk, sharp-shinned hawk, white-tailed kite, prairie falcon, northern harrier, red- tailed hawk, and golden eagle are wide ranging birds-of-prey that have been observed using the Project Site for the purposes of foraging and movement through the region (Rincon 2003; CEMC 2007). In addition, suitable foraging habitat exists within Project Site for the ferruginous hawk. Several of these species often utilize dense riparian corridors for the purposes of nesting (e.g., Cooper’s hawk). However, no nests have been observed within the mixed riparian community areas in the Project Site. Nevertheless, use of the Project Site by these species for foraging activities is frequent and the likelihood of occurrence is considered high. Cooper’s hawk, white- tailed kite, red-tailed hawk, red-shouldered hawk, and American kestrel have potential to nest at the Project Site. Other Protected Bird Species A number of bird species potentially occurring on the Project Site are protected during their nesting period under the provisions of the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. Field surveys indicated that cliff swallows occupy nest sites within the culvert at Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road (Padre 2003). In addition, several tree-nesting species, including California scrub jay, northern mockingbird, American goldfinch, and lesser goldfinch were observed in the mixed riparian habitat on the eastern side of the Project Site. Sensitive Habitats The CNDDB inventories natural communities and ranked them according to their rarity and potential for loss. Based on a CNDDB query for the Project area, central dune scrub, central foredunes, coastal dune scrub, central maritime chaparral, coastal brackish marsh, northern coastal salt marsh, northern interior cypress forest, serpentine bunchgrass, chaparral/oak woodland habitat, valley needlegrass grassland, and coastal and valley freshwater marsh are considered sensitive natural communities that have the potential to occur within the Project area. However, based on past and recent field surveys, valley needlegrass grassland and coastal and valley freshwater marsh are the only sensitive habitats existing within the Project area. Specifically, valley needlegrass grassland has been ranked by the CNDDB globally as G1, and at the State level as S3.1 and coastal and valley freshwater marsh has been ranked by the CNDDB globally as G3, and at the State level as S2.1. A global sensitivity level of G1 is considered extremely endangered and means that less than 2,000 acres of this habitat exists worldwide, G3 means only 10,000 to 50,000 acres exist worldwide. A state sensitivity of S2 means only 2,000 to 10,000 acres of this habitat exist statewide and is considered very threatened, and S3 indicates only 10,000 to 50,000 acres exist statewide. Furthermore, native perennial bunchgrass communities are considered rare by the CDFW. Native perennial bunchgrass habitat formerly exceeded approximately 5.35 million hectares in California, and an additional 3.87 million hectares of native perennial grassland existed with an oak overstory (EDAW 1999). Due to introduction of non-native annual grasses and grazing practices, currently the grassland habitat type that occurs throughout the state is dominated by introduced annual grasses. On the Project Site, purple needlegrass is primarily found in the far northeastern portion of the site in association with the ultramafic outcrop and derivative soils. Smaller populations are found in the southern portion of the north parcel near Tank Farm Road. Purple needlegrass grassland occupies 11.5 acres at the Project Site (Padre 2008c). Approximately 8.8 acres of the Project Site is composed of grassland with a significant 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-37 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR component of the native perennial bunchgrass, purple needlegrass (Nasella pulchra) (Figure 4.2- 4). Within any given square meter, the percent cover of purple needlegrass varies from 0 percent to as high as 80 percent. Grasslands containing 10 percent cover or greater by native grasses are considered sensitive by the CDFW, as well as the City of San Luis Obispo (EDAW 1999). A USACE wetland delineation of the entire site was completed in 1999 (EDAW 1999). This study determined that the Project Site contained 55.8 acres of USACE jurisdictional wetlands and 1.4 acres of Other Waters of the U.S. This was subsequently verified by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). A wetland delineation was also conducted in 2003 in accordance with CDFW wetland delineation guidelines (JENESIS 2003). This study determined that the Project Site contained 75.95 acres of state (one-parameter) wetlands, including the 55.8 acres previously identified as Federal wetlands and the 1.4 acres of Other Waters of the U.S. A more recent delineation of wetland resources at the Project Site was completed by Padre and WSP (Padre 2008a). The more recent delineation determined that there were 49 acres of Federal wetlands, 3.4 acres additional acres of “one-parameter” wetlands, and 3.9 acres falling under the category of Other Waters of the U.S. Padre 2013c (included in Bio-Appendix C.15) clarifies the acreages of wetland habitat with 52.0 acres of USACE Jurisdictional Wetland and Waters, 19.2 acres of non-USACE jurisdictional or isolated wetlands/waters, and an additional 16.85 of one parameter wetlands, for a total of 88.95 acres of one- parameter wetlands present on the project site. San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries are known steelhead habitat and are considered an integral component of the south-central coast steelhead ESU (NOAA 2000). On April 30, 2002, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia approved a National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) consent decree withdrawing critical habitat designations for 19 salmon and steelhead populations on the west coast, including those contained in the south-central coast steelhead ESU (NOAA 2000). However, a more thorough analysis of steelhead critical habitat was conducted by NMFS, which resulted in the re-issuance of critical habitat designations for the south-central coast steelhead ESU in 2005, including San Luis Obispo Creek. Wildlife Movement Corridors Wildlife migration corridors are generally defined as connections between habitat patches that allow for physical and genetic exchange between otherwise isolated animal populations. Migration corridors may be local, such as between foraging and nesting or denning areas, or they may be regional in nature. Migration corridors are not unidirectional access routes; however, reference is usually made to source and receiver areas in discussions of wildlife movement networks. Habitat linkages are migration corridors that contain contiguous strips of native vegetation between source and receiver areas. Habitat linkages provide cover and forage sufficient for temporary habitation by a variety of ground-dwelling animal species. Wildlife migration corridors are essential to the regional ecology of an area because they provide avenues of genetic exchange and allow animals to access alternative territories as fluctuating dispersal pressures dictate. The Project Site provides foraging habitat for an array of bird species as well as cover and forage for a variety of ground-dwelling animal species. Because of its size and rural character, it provides habitat for wide-ranging wildlife species. It also offers a seasonal refuge for migratory birds. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek adjacent to the Project Site may play an important role as a migration corridor and habitat linkage for wildlife species within the region. There is connectivity with agricultural lands and mountainous areas to the south. These migration corridors are especially critical through areas where human activities would otherwise prohibit or impair the movement of species between habitat areas. The importance of such corridors is underscored by the fact that urbanization has begun to encroach from the north, west, and east in the form of residential and commercial development and the San Luis Obispo Airport. 4.2.2 Regulatory Setting The following sections discuss plans, policies, and regulations relevant to protection of biological resources and administered by federal, state, and local regulatory agencies detailed in the Project Execution Plan (CEMC 2007). 4.2.2.1 Protected Resources Federal Authority The Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (FESA), administered by USFWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), provides protection to species listed as Threatened (FT) or Endangered (FE), or proposed for listing as Threatened (PFT) or Endangered PFE). In addition to the listed species, the Federal Candidate species could potentially be listed in the future. Federal candidate (FC) species include taxa for which substantial information on biological vulnerability and potential threats exist, and are maintained in order to support the appropriateness of proposing to list the taxa as an endangered or threatened species. Section 9 of the FESA prohibits the “take” of any member of a listed species. Take is defined as, to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” Harass is “an intentional or negligent act or omission that creates the likelihood of injury to a listed species by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavior patterns that include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering.” Harm is defined as “…significant habitat modification or degradation that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering.” Section 10 consultations are conducted when there is no Federal agency involvement in a project except compliance with FESA. Under Section 7 of the FESA, Federal agencies must consult with the USFWS when any action the agency authorizes through a permit may affect a listed endangered or threatened species. This process usually begins as informal consultation. The Federal agency requests informal consultation. Discussions between the two agencies includes the listed species that are expected or have potential to occur in the proposed action area, and what effect the proposed action may have on those species. When the Federal agency determines, through a biological assessment or other review, that its action is likely to adversely affect a listed species, the agency submits to the USFWS a request 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-39 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR for formal consultation. During formal consultation, the USFWS and the agency share information about the proposed project and the species likely to be affected. Formal consultation may last up to 90 days, after which the USFWS will prepare a biological opinion on whether the proposed activity will jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species. The Service has 45 days after completion of formal consultation to write the opinion. Under the FESA, jeopardy occurs when an action is reasonably expected, directly or indirectly, to diminish a species’ numbers, reproduction, or distribution so that the likelihood of survival and recovery in the wild is appreciably reduced. When the USFWS makes a jeopardy determination, it also provides the consulting Federal agency with reasonable and prudent alternative actions. These alternatives are often developed with input and assistance from the Federal agency. Alternatives must: be consistent with the purpose of the proposed project, be consistent with the Federal agency’s legal authority and jurisdiction, be economically and technically feasible, and in the USFWS’s opinion, avoid jeopardy. In some cases, the USFWS finds that an action may adversely affect a species, but not jeopardize its continued existence. When this happens, the USFWS prepares an incidental take statement for the proposed Federal project. Under most circumstances, the ESA prohibits take, which is defined as harming (includes killing) or harassing a listed species. Incidental take – take that results from a Federal action but is not the purpose of the action – may be allowed when the USFWS approves it through an incidental take statement. The statement includes the amount or extent of anticipated take due to the Federal action, reasonable and prudent measures to minimize the take, and terms and conditions that must be observed when implementing those measures. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) would be the lead Federal agency for the proposed Project, and would consult with USFWS and potentially NMFS to identify effects to endangered and threatened species as required under Section 7(a)(2) of the FESA. A Biological Assessment will be required as part of this consultation to provide sufficient information to determine the Project’s potential to affect threatened or endangered species. The USACE must make one of three possible findings for each listed species (the USFWS and/or NMFS may or may not concur): No effect: The proposed action would not affect the listed species or critical habitat. Not likely to adversely affect: Effects of the proposed action on the listed species are expected to be discountable (extremely unlikely to occur), insignificant (minimal impact without take), or beneficial. Likely to adversely affect: An adverse effect may occur as a direct or indirect result of the proposed action, and the effect is not discountable, insignificant, or beneficial. The USFWS also administers the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16 USC 703-711) and the Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 USC 668-688). Under the MBTA, it is unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in Federal Code of Regulations 50 CFR 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 CFR 21). The Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Act prohibits the taking or possession of bald and golden eagles, their eggs, or their nests without a permit from USFWS. State Authority CDFW administers several laws and programs designed to protect fish and wildlife resources. Principal of these is the California Endangered Species Act of 1984 (CESA) that regulates the listing and take of state endangered (SE) and state threatened (ST) species (Fish and Game Code Section 2050). Under Section 2081 of CESA, CDFW may authorize the take of an endangered or threatened species, or candidate species by a permit or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for scientific, educational, or management purposes. CDFW maintains lists of state candidate endangered (SCE) species and state candidate threatened (SCT) species. California candidate species are afforded the same level of protection as listed species. CDFW also designates species of special concern (CSC) that are species of limited distribution, declining populations, diminishing habitat, or unusual scientific, recreational, or educational value. These species do not have the same legal protection as listed species, but may be added to official lists in the future. CDFW maintains the CSC list as a management tool to call attention to declining populations and focus efforts on decreasing threats to long-term viability. In addition, the CDFW is a trustee Agency (pursuant to CDFW Code Section 1802) for the State’s fish and wildlife. CDFW administers other state laws designed to protect wildlife and plants. Under Section 3511 of the Fish and Game Code, CDFW designates species that are afforded “fully protected” (FP) status. Under this protection, designated species can only be taken or possessed with a permit that may require an approved Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP). Section 3503 of the Fish and Game Code protects all birds-of-prey, their eggs, and their nests. CDFW manages the California Native Plant Protection Act of 1977, which was enacted to identify, designate and, protect rare plants (Fish and Game Code Section 1900, et seq.). In accordance with CDFW guidelines, CNPS 1B list plants are considered “rare” under the Act, and are evaluated in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) reports. Local Authority Special-status species of the Project area are afforded protection by the County of San Luis Obispo under goals and polices contained in the County of San Luis Obispo General Plan, Agriculture & Open Space Element (1998) and the San Luis Obispo Area Plan (2002). These documents provide a framework of policies designed to protect special-status species and sensitive habitat areas. Species within the Project area are also afforded protection by the City of San Luis Obispo under goals and polices contained in the City of San Luis Obispo General Plan, Chapter 6 Conservation and Open Space Element in regards to protected listed species and species of special concern, wildlife habitat and corridors, and trees and other plants. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-41 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2.2.2 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands Federal Authority The USACE is responsible for issuing permits for the placement of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States (waters) pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). As defined by the USACE, waters are those that are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; tributaries and impoundments to such waters; all interstate waters including interstate wetlands; and territorial seas (33 CFR 328.3(a)(3)).1 Wetlands are a special category of waters, and are defined as: “...those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas” 33 CFR 328.3(b)). Following a 2006 court case, the USACE and Environmental Protection Agency issued guidance to their field offices on how to implement the Court’s decision (Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2006). In the guidance, the agencies offer three categories: (1) certain types of waters over which they “would assert jurisdiction” (traditional navigable waters, wetlands adjacent to such waters, relatively permanent non-navigable tributaries of such waters, and wetlands directly abutting such tributaries); (2) other types of waters they would consider case by case to determine whether they have a “significant nexus” with a traditional navigable water; and (3) other “features” over which they “generally would not assert jurisdiction,” such as gullies, erosional features, and ditches excavated in and draining uplands (Briscoe 2007). In non-tidal waters, the lateral extent of USACE jurisdiction is determined by the ordinary high water mark, which is defined as the “line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas” (33 CFR 328(e)). In addition, a wetland definition has been adopted by the USFWS to include both vegetated and non-vegetated wetlands, recognizing that some types of wetlands may lack vegetation (e.g., mudflats, sandbar, rocky shores, and sand flats), but still provide functional habitat for fish and wildlife species (Cowardin et al. 1979). These wetlands are defined as “…lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For purposes of this classification, wetlands must have one or more of the following three attributes: (1) at least periodically, the land supports predominantly hydrophytes; (2) the substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soil; and (3) the 1 Based on the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [2001], and guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [2001], the federal government no longer asserts jurisdiction over isolated waters and wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act based on the ”migratory bird rule.” 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-42 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR substrate is non-soil and is saturated with water or covered by shallow water at some time during the growing season of each year." Some of the USFWS-defined wetlands are not regulated by the federal government. The upper (landward) limit of USFWS-defined wetlands are the boundary between land with predominantly hydrophytic cover and land with predominantly mesophytic or xerophytic cover; the boundary between soil that is predominantly hydric and soil that is predominantly non- hydric; or in the case of wetlands without vegetation or soil, the boundary between land that is flooded or saturated at some time each year and land that is not (Cowardin et al. 1979). The lower limit in inland areas is established at a depth of 6.6 feet below the water surface; unless emergent plants, shrubs, or trees grow beyond this depth, at which the deepwater edge of such vegetation is the boundary (Cowardin et al. 1979). Section 404 Permits may be issued only for the “least environmentally damaging practicable alternative.” That is, authorization of a proposed discharge is prohibited if there is a practicable alternative that would have less adverse impacts and lacks other significant adverse consequences. Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, applicants for a federal license or permit such as a Section 404 Permit must obtain certification from the state (RWQCB), or a waiver of certification, that the activity would not adversely affect water quality. State and Local Authority Pursuant to Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code, CDFW requires a Streambed Alteration Agreement between CDFW and any state or local governmental agency, person, business, or public utility before the initiation of any construction project that would: (1) divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or the bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake; (2) use materials from a streambed; or (3) result in the disposal or deposition of debris, waste, or other material containing crumbled, flaked, or ground pavement where it can pass into any river, stream, or lake. In August 1993, Governor Wilson announced his “California Wetlands Conservation Policy,” created by Executive Order W-59-93. The goals of the policy are to: (1) ensure no overall net loss and achieve a long-term net gain in the quantity, quality, and permanence of wetlands acreage and values in California in a manner that fosters creativity, stewardship, and respect for private property; (2) reduce procedural complexity in the administration of [s]tate and federal wetlands conservation programs; and (3) encourage partnerships to make landowner incentive programs and cooperative planning efforts the primary focus of wetlands conservation and restoration. The CDFW Commission Policies (CDFG Code, page 578-579, 2011) state that it is the policy of the Fish and Game Commission to “strongly discourage development in or conversion of wetlands. It opposes, consistent with its legal authority, any development or conversion which would result in a reduction of wetland acreage or wetland habitat values. To that end, the Commission opposes wetland development proposals unless, at a minimum, project mitigation assures there will be no net loss of either wetland habitat values or acreage.” As further stated in the Fish and Game Commission Policies Recommended Wetland Definition Section: The 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-43 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Commission’s wetland policy is not a regulatory program; the role of the CDFW and Commission is primarily advisory “as in, but not limited to, the application of the California Environmental Quality Act”. The section also states that the CDFW “has found the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) wetland definition and classification system to be the most biologically valid…” Unlike USACE, the USFWS definition only requires the presence of one wetland indicator for an area to qualify as a wetland. The Agriculture & Open Space Element of the County of San Luis Obispo General Plan identifies a series of unique plant or animal habitats including the following: habitat of rare, endangered, or threatened plant or animal species as classified by state and federal agencies and the CNPS; wetlands and marshes; and sensitive natural communities as identified in the CDFW Natural Diversity Data Base (such as valley needlegrass grassland). The San Luis Obispo County General Plan has recognized the importance of wetlands. However, there is no inventory of the wetland resources within the County, so the identification and protection of these resources most often occurs when a development proposal is submitted on property that may include a wetland. The City of San Luis Obispo General Plan, Chapter 6, identifies wetlands and vernal pools as valuable resources and addresses wetlands in regards to wildlife corridors, creek/wetland setbacks, open space buffers and mitigation requirements. The General Plan also provides mapping of the City’s creeks and wetlands. A preliminary analysis of the Project’s consistency with applicable biological plans and polices is provided in Appendix E. 4.2.3 Significance Criteria Criteria used in determining impact significance were based on guidelines contained in Appendix G of CEQA, but the criteria were expanded in consideration of specific characteristics of the Project Site and guidance from the City of San Luis Obispo. Impacts would be considered significant if the proposed Project would result in: The potential for reduction, loss, or degradation of habitat for threatened, endangered, or special-status species; The potential for loss or “take” of any federal- and/or state-listed plant or animal species; fully-protected species; special-status species, or species protected by the MTBA); A net loss or permanent change in the extent or functional value of any habitat or biotic community considered biologically, scientifically, recreationally, or economically significant by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations; Adverse effect on Federal wetlands as defined in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; Alteration or destruction of habitat that precludes reestablishment of native populations of plants and animals; 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-44 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impairment of movement, migration, or dispersal of resident and migratory fish and wildlife species; or Substantial loss of habitat or population decline of any native fish, wildlife or plant species, or overall reduction in biological diversity. The following three sections discuss impacts and mitigation measures and are divided into: (1) Section 4.2.4 which includes those impacts resulting from the proposed remediation of the Project Site and the land clearing within the proposed development parcels (2) Section 4.2.5 which includes the discussion of impacts for the City Development Plan, and (3) Section 4.2.6 for the County Development Plan Project elements. Each of the three sections discusses impacts for the seven bulleted significance criteria listed in Section 4.2.3. 4.2.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Remediation would require soil excavation and associated ground disturbance within four Operational Units (OU) identified in the Project Execution Plan (CEMC 2007). This would result in loss of vegetation, wetlands, special status plant species, and wildlife habitat. In addition to the remediation targets, similar impacts are likely to occur through equipment staging and access, demolition and cleanup of features related to former land use, excavation at four identified on- site soil borrow sites, one off-site borrow site, and widening of existing roads to accommodate access to and hauling of backfill material. Site restoration is planned for those areas subject to temporary disturbance. Impacts were quantified based on the results of field surveys, mapping, and information contained in the Remedial Action Plan and in Padre survey reports (Padre 2008a-c, Padre 2012, CEMC 2007; Avocet 2007). These quantifications are preliminary because remediation plans may be refined in light of testing and analysis of data obtained during project implementation and since various plant and wildlife population distributions are dynamic and thus subject to change. For each identified impact, the following framework was used: Impact Discussion; Mitigation Measures; and Residual Impacts The residual impact is the impact classification after any mitigation has been applied. If an impact is found to be less than significant then the residual impact would remain less than significant with or without mitigation. All residual impacts identified in this document have been classified according to the following criteria: Class I - Significant and Unmitigable: Significant adverse impacts that cannot be effectively mitigated. No measures can be taken to avoid or reduce these adverse effects to insignificant or negligible levels. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-45 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Class II – Less Than Significant with Mitigation: These impacts are potentially similar in significance to those of Class I impacts, but can be eliminated or reduced below an issue area’s significance criteria threshold by the implementation of mitigation measures. Class III – Less Than Significant: An adverse impact that does not meet or exceed an issue’s significance criteria threshold. Generally, no mitigation measures are required for such impacts, although they may still be recommended should the lead or responsible agency deem it appropriate to reduce the impact to the maximum extent feasible. Class IV - Beneficial: Effects are beneficial to the environment. In terms of the significance thresholds, the Project would create the following impacts due to soil remediation and restoration activities. Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.1 Site remediation has the potential to result in both short- term and long-term impacts to habitat for listed and special status species. Remediation Class II Rare Plants Plant taxa recognized as “rare” by the CNPS, including Congdon’s tarplant, Cambria morning glory, San Luis Obispo owl’s clover, and San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya would be removed during excavation and backfill procedures necessary for soil remediation and related operations e.g., equipment access and staging, soil borrow sites, site cleanup). Excavation and backfill would impact purple needlegrass grasslands similarly. The removal of several San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya would result in a permanent loss of this species because its preferred habitat rock outcrops) would be permanently lost with the disturbances expected at the Flower Mounds area. The Conceptual restoration plan (Padre 2009) accounts for the salvaging and curation of individuals of this species to be out-planted off site at a later date in suitable habitat. Table 4.2-5 summarizes the impacts to rare plant species habitat. It is important to note that impacts to rare plants were estimated based on surveys and mapping completed in 2003, 2008 (Padre 2008c), and 2012 (Padre 2013). Several of the rare plants species present at the Project Site (e.g., Congdon’s tarplant, Cambria morning glory, and Hoover’s button-celery) are annual species and plant numbers are variable each year, therefore, these populations would exhibit some deviation in distribution from year to year. A “75% Basis of Design Report Landscape Restoration plan (Conceptual Restoration Plan) is proposed as part of the Project (Padre and WSP 2009). The Applicant states that its intention in preparing the Restoration Plan is to “inform the environmental analysis regarding the basic approach to mitigation impact associated with the project;” “the specifics of this particular plan would be included in the environmental analysis;” and that “it may change significantly following input from the CEQA process.” The plan includes mitigation with at least a 1:1 on-site replacement ratio for unavoidable impacts as a result of anticipated remediation and development activities to rare plant species (e.g., Cambria morning glory, Congdon’s tarplant, San Luis Obispo owl’s clover, Hoover’s button-celery, purple needlegrass grassland). Restoration of the Project Site would impact additional rare plant populations; however, these impacts would be, in most cases, temporary and mitigated through the restoration of the site which would enhance the existing habitat and increase ecosystem functions at the Project Site. Detailed descriptions of 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-46 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR each rare plant species, seed and propagule collection strategies, and propagation recommendations are outlined in the Botanical Resources Report (Padre and WSP 2008c). Impacts to rare plant populations were quantified by comparing species distribution maps with information in the Remedial Action Plan (CEMC 2007; Avocet 2007). The proposed remediation activities would impact approximately 24.58 total acres of rare plant habitat, as shown in Table 4.2-5. Table 4.2-5 Estimated Impacts to Rare Plant Species and Sensitive Habitat Areas Species Remediation Impacts acres) Mitigation Area acres) Cambria morning glory Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis 2.45 8.2 Castilleja densiflora ssp. obispoensis San Luis Obispo owl’s clover 5.69 7.2 Congdon’s tarplant Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii 9.67 11.88 San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya Dudleya abramsii ssp. Bettinae 0.04 0.00 Salvage and curation Hoover’s button-celery Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri 0.00 0.02 Purple Needlegrass Grassland Nassella pulchra 6.73 >11.0 Total 24.58 Source: CEMC 2007, Padre 2008c\ South coast steelhead The south coast steelhead and critical habitat for this species are present in the San Luis Obispo Creek watershed and project vicinity. Proposed restoration efforts would include re-establishing connectivity to oxbows immediately adjacent to San Luis Obispo Creek and would include clearing of vegetation, grading, and subsequent re-planting of riparian species adjacent to the creek. Clearing and grading could result in short-term impacts to water quality resulting from project related sediments flowing into the creek. Sedimentation could occur during both the construction and the restoration phases up until the creek banks have become re-established with the proposed riparian community. Sedimentation is especially detrimental during steelhead spawning; however, this species is unlikely to be spawning in the project vicinity due to the lack of suitable habitat. The proposed action includes the installation of temporary sediment control fencing upgradient of grading activities to reduce the potential for surface flows. The Project would not result in any temporary or permanent structures in the creek that would restrict aquatic species’ migrations. One of the restoration goals would be to increase functions and values for 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-47 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR this species within the project footprint which result in a beneficial impact to this species. Impacts to this species and habitat are expected to be short-term and mitigated to less than significant with the implementation of appropriate sediment control measures. Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Some habitat currently supporting the federally threatened VPFS would be permanently lost through remediation and restoration of the Project Site, primarily by removal of existing man- made storage reservoirs and containments. One of the primary goals of the proposed restoration of the Project Site is to replace and improve the overall functions of the entire Project Site so as to end up with a net increase of functioning sensitive species habitat. The proposed restoration activities would restore and enhance VPFS habitat through (1) avoidance of habitat which will not be impacted by remediation or development activities; (2) habitat creation in areas previously containing upland habitat; and (3) habitat enhancement via the improvement of existing habitat functions by removing contaminated material, increasing hydrologic flow, and eliminating existing constricting features in areas containing disturbed or partially functioning habitat; and finally, (4) the preservation of habitat: the avoided, restored, and enhanced VPFS habitat will be protected and managed in perpetuity for the benefit of VPFS and other sensitive species. The proposed conceptual restoration approach was documented in the Conceptual Restoration Plan by Padre and WSP Padre 2009). The report presents a landscape-level design at the 75 percent level of completion for the wetland habitat and special status species affected by the Project. Chevron prepared the document to provide guidance in developing the final restoration plan that would be developed with Chevron and Agency coordination. The most recent survey results conducted by Padre (Spring 2012) updates the extent of occupied habitat to 32.6 acres of habitat on the Project Site and a total of 14.78 acres of VPFS habitat being impacted by Project remediation (12.9 acres) and restoration (1.88 acres). As described in the Conceptual Restoration Plan, the Applicant proposes to mitigate impacts to VPFS habitat by restoring seasonally inundated depressions, as well as creating vernal swale habitats within the upland ecosystems and remediated reservoirs. Repopulation of restored pools and populating newly created pools would be stimulated by inoculation, consisting of material collected from topsoil of impacted occupied VPFS habitat or, if needed, gathered from “donor” pools unaffected by remediation and restoration areas. Table 4.2-6 Estimated Impacts to Sensitive Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Habitat Occupied Habitat within Project Site Remediation Impacts Restoration Impacts 32.6 acres 12.9 acres 1.88 acres Source: Padre 2012, Padre and WSP 2009 There is the potential that unoccupied habitat may become occupied prior to the onset of construction activities due to the movement of cysts by wildlife, wind dispersal, water dispersal, or other transport mechanisms. It is less likely that occupied habitats would become unoccupied in the absence of a significant change in site conditions (e.g., a change in hydrology that would 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-48 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR preclude VPFS from completing their lifecycle, or ground disturbance that would have removed or buried adults or cysts). The Restoration Plan includes specific and detailed restoration of VPFS habitat (Padre and WSP 2009) at a level “greater than 1:1 acreage mitigation for unavoidable impacts.” Typically, regulatory agencies, such as the USFWS and CDFW, who manage and permit sensitive wildlife habitat restoration efforts, require specific replacement ratios to ensure no net loss of sensitive species habitat. These replacement ratios often include ratios greater than 1:1 depending on the importance of the habitat, amount of area that is disturbed, other available habitat in the area, known methods of habitat replacement, probability of success, and the length of time required to replace that habitat. In addition to requiring no net loss of habitat, these agencies typically require the replacement or increase of a project site’s functions and values as these values relate to biological resources, and specifically so as to replace the functions for the sensitive species in question. Both the USFWS and CDFW have consented to the general approach presented in the Applicant’s Conceptual Restoration Plan, (the focus of which concentrates on an overall increase in habitat function as opposed to habitat replacement ratios) and both the USFWS and the CDFW have agreed conceptually with a replacement ratio of 1:1 for impacts to VPFS habitat in conjunction with a review of the Final Restoration Plan. The USFWS has had many discussions with the Applicant and has given support for the general approach of mitigating impacts to VPFS habitat by increasing onsite habitat functions and values. However, the Applicant has not submitted a final restoration plan for agency review and neither the USFWS or CDFW has conducted a review of the Applicant’s Conceptual Restoration Plan, nor approved any part of that Plan (Jenny Marek, USFWS personal communication; Melissa Boggs, CDFW, personal communication. In addition to the restoration and enhancement approach to reducing the long-term effects on VPFS habitat, the proposed project includes a preservation element which would result in at least 32.6 acres of VPFS habitat to be protected and managed in perpetuity for the benefit of this and other sensitive biological resources. Restoration efforts that would eventually replace and potentially improve the existing VPFS habitat on site would result in a temporary loss of sensitive habitat on the Project Site until that habitat eventually becomes fully functioning. In addition, due to the extremely sensitive nature of creating vernal pool habitat and relocating soils with this species’ cysts, there is a risk that some of the restoration efforts would not be successful. Replacement ratios for the loss of sensitive species habitat would typically require greater than 1:1 ratios. However, the proposed project includes a restoration approach that focuses on an overall increase in habitat function, an approach which is agreeable to, and coordinated with the USFWS and CDFW. In addition, the proposed project includes a preservation element that would result in VPFS habitat being protected in perpetuity. Therefore, replacement ratios for the loss of VPFS habitat would be adequately mitigated with a 1:1 replacement ratio. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-49 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures BIO-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a final restoration plan to the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building, City of San Luis Obispo, Department of Natural Resources, USFWS, USACE, and CDFW for review. The restoration plan shall be approved by San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building USFWS, and CDFW in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo, Department of Natural Resources. The final plan shall be revised as necessary to adequately mitigate actual disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species due to remediation. Conservation easement(s) shall be recorded on all property associated with the final restoration plan that is not designated for development. Draft conservation easement agreements, in a form approved by County Counsel and the City Attorney, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal of the final restoration plan. The final conservation easements shall be approved by the County and City in consultation with other resource agencies, and recorded, prior to final inspection of the restoration site(s) to protect biological resources in perpetuity. BIO-1b The Applicant shall conduct updated surveys of sensitive species habitats including sensitive plant species, CRLF, wetland habitat, and VPFS habitat) within the Project Site within the appropriate season immediately prior to the onset of any ground disturbances associated with the Project in order to evaluate the current occupancy of suitable habitat for sensitive species and to refine the final habitat mitigation replacement acreages. Updated surveys for federally listed species shall be completed per the timing and methodology specified by resource agency protocol. BIO-1c The final restoration plan shall provide for plant salvaging and replanting where appropriate (e.g., San Luis Obispo dudleya), restoration, and/or creation of habitat suitable for special status plant species including Cambria morning glory, Congdon’s tarplant, San Luis Obispo owl’s clover, Hoover’s button-celery, San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya, and purple needlegrass. To offset impacts to VPFS habitat, the final restoration plan shall require a minimum of a 1:1 creation or restoration replacement of all VPFS habitat impacted by remediation or restoration efforts (or at least 14.78 acres of VPFS habitat depending on final disturbance acreages). The restoration shall be designed to restore or enhance enough habitat to ensure the final restoration replacement ratio. The final plan shall also include defined schedules of restoration efforts, success criteria, weed management methods including for those areas not being remediated or developed to ensure weed species do not encroach into restored areas, monitoring schedules, reporting requirements, and a Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan, (see mitigation measure BIO-5c). The objective of the Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be to assess if the restored habitats are functioning equal to or better than pre-Project conditions. The assessment of function shall be based on 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-50 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR indicators such as wildlife use and presence of sensitive species within the habitats compared to pre-Project conditions. BIO-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the County to fund and provide access for a County-approved (in consultation with the City) independent biological monitor who shall regularly review and monitor remediation and restoration efforts to ensure that conditions of approval are being enforced and that success criteria are being met. The independent biological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt activities if permit requirements and conditions are not being met. BIO-1e If performance standards detailed in the Final Restoration Plan are not achieved in any restoration area, the Applicant shall submit and implement an alternative or adaptive mitigation strategy during the restoration and monitoring phase, for approval to the County or City, and appropriate resource agencies including the USFWS and CDFW. BIO-1f The monitoring results collected as part of the Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be reported at least annually to the County, City, and appropriate resource agencies (i.e., USFWS and CDFW). The annual report shall document the effects of the proposed Project to the VPFS on the property and include acreage of occupied habitat that was impacted. The report shall contain a discussion of the problems encountered in implementing sensitive species habitat protection and other protective measures and recommendations for adaptive management to enhance the conservation of sensitive species habitat. BIO-1g Remediation and restoration activities within 100 feet of potential or occupied VPFS habitat shall be scheduled to occur when the soil is dry to the touch both at the surface and one inch below the surface. After any precipitation event of greater than 0.2 inches, Project activities will only occur after the soil has dried sufficiently as described above, and no sooner than 48 hours after the rain event ends to reduce potential impacts to sensitive VPFS habitat outside of the construction and remediation boundaries. Project activities in upland areas can occur during the rainy season with appropriate habitat protection measures including exclusion fencing, biological monitoring, and sediment control measures to ensure that construction related materials do not enter VPFS habitat. BIO-1h Only qualified, USFWS-approved, personnel with demonstrable field experience conducting VPFS cyst collection and reintroduction, consistent with the proposed Project activities, shall handle VPFS cysts, identify VPFS habitat, and conduct VPFS monitoring. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall assist with marking the limits of disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species. Work shall not be conducted in areas marked for avoidance. BIO-1i The VPFS-qualified biologist shall conduct sensitive vernal pool branchiopod surveys within the appropriate season immediately prior to the start of construction activities per the timing and methodology specified by USFWS protocol. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall monitor during construction 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-51 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR activities in the vicinity of habitats to be avoided. The final acreage of habitat loss shall be revised as necessary to adequately mitigate actual disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species due to remediation. BIO-1j The VPFS-qualified biologist shall conduct cyst collection efforts (cyst-bearing soil) and storage efforts from work areas prior to construction activities from the entire work area of each impacted pool when the ephemerally wetted areas are dry. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall follow USFWS standard procedures and guidance established in that agency’s permitting process The cysts shall be stored in labeled containers that are adequately ventilated. The cysts shall be kept out of direct sunlight to prevent excessive heating of the soil. The cysts shall be kept out of direct contact with water. When restored VPFS habitat is constructed, the inoculum shall be placed within the surface layer of the soil in a manner following USFWS protocols and guidance. BIO-1k Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, the Project Applicant (via the USACE) shall consult with the USFWS and NMFS to obtain an Incidental Take Statement, pursuant to Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act to cover the Project's "take" (which includes the permanent and temporary loss of VPFS habitat and the potential impact to south-central coast steelhead habitat). The Applicant shall comply with all measures issued by USFWS and NMFS for the Project. BIO-1l Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Project Applicant shall be required to obtain all applicable Federal and State permits and/or agreements, including, but not necessarily limited to: a Section 404 Permit from the USACE; and a Section 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW. Residual Impacts A successfully implemented restoration effort, as detailed in the Conceptual Restoration Plan Draft, would result in a 1:1 replacement for habitat supporting sensitive plant species, therefore reducing impacts to these species to less than significant. One of the primary goals of the restoration effort would be the creation and enhancement of existing habitat on the Project Site so as to increase the overall biological function and value of the habitat for VPFS. Mitigation Measure BIO-1b, requiring updated surveys of VPFS habitat in the appropriate season immediately prior to the onset of any ground disturbances in order to refine the final habitat mitigation replacement acreages, Mitigation Measure BIO-1c, requiring a 1:1 replacement of all VPFS habitat impacted by remediation efforts, and the establishment of a conservation easement BIO-1a) for all property associated with the final restoration plan that are not designated for development would reduce impacts to this species to less than significant. Areas impacted by remediation and restoration efforts would be restored to fully functioning habitat and would have the oversight of County and regulatory agencies. With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the impact to VPFS habitat would be less than significant with mitigation Class II). 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-52 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.2 Site remediation and restoration would result in the taking of listed specimens, special-status species, or species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Remediation Class II for VPFS, and other Sensitive Species, MBTA, and Aquatic Species Class III for Ecological Risk Rare Plants Specimens of four rare plant species (Congdon’s tarplant, Cambria morning glory, San Luis Obispo owl’s clover, and San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya) would be removed during remediation activities. Stands of purple needlegrass would also be removed. Padre (2009) reports that nine California walnut trees would be removed during restoration efforts and that part of the restoration efforts would include the outplanting of 865 one gallon walnut tree containers. Estimates of population density for special status plants were based upon the surveys of field surveys (Padre and WSP 2008b). These estimates are useful in determining target densities for restoration, but they have limited application for assessing impacts because of the variability in population density from year to year, particularly for species with an annual growth habit. Impacts are better evaluated by quantifying affected acreage, as discussed with impact BIO.1 and shown in Table 4.2-5. Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Individuals (cysts) of the federal-threatened VPFS would be destroyed during soil remediation within natural and artificial wetlands. Impacts to VPFS are better assessed by quantifying the area of affected habitat. Mitigation, consisting of enhancing existing habitat recreating suitable habitat and repopulating through inoculation, can be determined on this basis. It would not be possible to quantify the number of individual specimens destroyed during Project implementation. The loss of some of the cysts in remediation and relocation efforts would not be considered a substantial threat to the entire population which requires only a portion of the cysts to survive. Many of the onsite ponded areas in which this species has been found will be unaffected by remediation and restoration efforts, thereby ensuring a continued presence and source for repopulating enhanced and remediated habitat. The most recent survey results conducted by Padre (Spring 2012) determined that a total of 12.9 acres of VPFS habitat would be impacted by remediation and restoration. This is considered a significant impact but would be mitigated to less than significant with habitat remediation and enhancement and a restoration requirement of actually improving the function and value for this species’ on site habitat. Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Wildlife Species Special-status aquatic and semi-aquatic vertebrate species, including the south-central California coast steelhead, two-striped garter snake, western pond turtle, and CRLF, are either known to occur or have the potential to occur within adjacent Acacia Creek and the east fork of San Luis 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-53 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Obispo Creek. Although the two-striped garter snake, western pond turtle, and CRLF have not been observed during recent 2008 and 2012 Padre surveys, the nearby upland habitats is suitable upland habitat that could be used for forage and cover. Remediation and development activities that are close to these streams could directly impact semi-aquatic species using adjacent upland habitats. Indirect impacts to animals using the aquatic environment could occur through inadvertent spills or sedimentation caused by equipment operation. Due to the low likelihood that most of these species are present in the actual work disturbance area, potential impacts to aquatic and semi-aquatic wildlife species would be considered significant but mitigable. Migratory Birds Several native bird species protected by the MBTA and CDFW are known or expected to occur at the Project Site (Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the Fish and Game Code). Birds are especially vulnerable to impacts when nesting. Remediation activities would necessitate vegetation removal and other ground disturbance, including soil excavation, which could result in nest destruction and loss of eggs, nestlings, or hatchlings which would be considered a significant but mitigable impact. Ecological Risk The primary objective of the predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA, BBL 2004) prepared for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team (SERRT), was to evaluate the potential ecological risks at the site and to provide a screening-level evaluation of potential ecological risks. The pERA analyzed the effects to biological receptors from pre-remediation (Scenario 1) and a post-remediation scenario (Scenario 2) conditions on the Project Site using representative plant and animal species including aquatic and invertebrate species. The pERA specifically excluded evaluating risks to ecological receptors in reservoirs 5, 7, and all surface hydrocarbon expressions (all of which are included in the proposed remediation areas) because these areas were known to or potentially exceed toxicity thresholds. In general, the pERA found only de minimus (“so minor as to disregard”) or limited exceedances of thresholds (representing maximum potential exposure) for some contamination including lead, arsenic, total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). In other words, exposing biological receptors to the maximum concentrations detected in the field predicted no or only minor levels of effects. The pERA further concluded, in regard to the most sensitive resources, that,“limited exceedances of conservative benchmarks are not expected to adversely affect wetland plant or invertebrate populations.” In addition to the ecological risk of exposure to hydrocarbons, the oil, sheen, liquid oil, pliable oil present on the Project Site, also has presented an oil entrapment hazard to wildlife, which would be eventually eliminated as part of the project activities. However, during the remediation and restoration efforts, wildlife could also come into contact with contaminated soils, oil, sheen, and other harmful hydrocarbon related material when more of this non-weathered material would be exposed. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-54 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Applicant proposes that long-term monitoring of the Project Site be conducted after remedial actions have been implemented. The proposed remediation includes long term monitoring of groundwater to observe migration of petroleum products into the local groundwater. Long-term monitoring and water sampling would ensure that those actions taken under the Project (e.g., excavations and cap construction) would continue to meet their remedial objectives. Therefore, although most of the affected materials on-site would remain after remediation is complete, ongoing monitoring would determine whether maintenance activities are necessary. Inspections would include looking for resurfacing of plastic hydrocarbon expressions at the excavation locations. Further recurrence of a surface expression would prompt evaluation and focused remedial actions. The plants and wildlife currently on the Project Site, as evidenced by their presence, have already demonstrated some level of resiliency to the current effects of contaminants known to be present throughout the area. After the initial construction related disturbances, it is expected that remediation activities, which include the excavation or capping of contaminated material, would eventually reduce the exposure risk to most plant and wildlife species including sensitive resources. Therefore, impacts resulting from exposure to contaminated materials during or after remediation activities to sensitive wildlife or plant species are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures BIO-2a Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall fund and implement a biological resources training program for all construction workers and their contractors to minimize potential impacts to sensitive wildlife species. Training shall occur prior to initial construction activities and again, annually and as needed for new workers. Prior to issuance of demolition permit, the training program shall be reviewed and approved by the County Department of Planning and Building in consultation with the Environmental Monitor (see EM-1) and City, and shall include a description of important biological resources within the Project Site and all applicable conditions, permit requirements, and protection measures implemented to protect those resources. BIO-2b Prior to construction activities, all grading limits and construction boundaries shall be delineated by construction fencing. Sensitive species habitat shall be delineated with specific sensitive species labeling (e.g., permanent signage every 100 feet along the fence stating “No Entry Sensitive Habitat.”). The County shall approve the fencing prior to commencement of grading activities (including clearing and grubbing). BIO-2c Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the County to fund a biological monitor, selected by the Applicant and approved by the County in consultation with the City and the USFWS to minimize potential impacts to sensitive species. The County-qualified biologist shall conduct sensitive species’ (including CRLF) surveys immediately prior (within the appropriate season) to construction activities and shall monitor during 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-55 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR construction activities in the vicinity of habitats to be avoided. Any sensitive species observed during the pre-construction surveys shall be relocated out of harm’s way by a qualified and permitted biologist into the nearest suitable habitat as determined in consultation with the jurisdictional resource agency outside the disturbance area. Construction and sediment control fencing shall be inspected each work day during construction activities to ensure that sensitive species are not exposed to hazards. The Applicant shall be responsible for conducting inspections of the work area each work day to ensure that excavation areas, restored habitats, and other open water habitat in the area do not have oil sheen, liquid oil, or any other potential exposure risk to wildlife. If any exposure risk is identified, the Applicant shall implement measures that could include, but are not limited to hazing, fencing, and wildlife removals to eliminate the exposure risk. The Applicant shall prepare and submit for approval, as part of the Final Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan, an Oiled Wildlife Contingency Plan to the County and CDFW. BIO-2d To minimize potential impacts to nesting native bird species, and in compliance with the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, or 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, all activities resulting in ground disturbances during all phases of remediation, restoration, pipe removal, and construction activities involving vegetation removal/trimming shall be done, as feasible, outside the breeding season (February 15 through August 31). If vegetation must be removed during this period, then the Applicant shall retain a biologist acceptable to the County in consultation with the City to conduct surveys for nesting birds. Surveys shall be conducted within three days prior to vegetation removal or other construction-related disturbances. If nesting birds are observed within the vicinity, then a minimum 100-foot buffer from the nest would be established. The buffer would be delineated by orange construction fencing or other delineator approved by County in consultation with the City and signage and would remain in place until the nest is abandoned or the young have fledged. The qualified biologist shall be present when any buffer fencing is established., The qualified biologist shall monitor the nest to ensure that Project activities do not violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or the California Fish and Game Code. At minimum, the biologist would check for new active nests, and determine the status of ongoing active nests, weekly during the specified nesting season. The biologist would ensure that all fencing and signage was properly maintained, and would provide weekly, or less frequent if requested by the agencies, e-mail updates on the status of all monitored nests to the County, City, CDFW, and USFWS. If the biologist determines that nesting is being disrupted, the construction activities shall cease and wait until a new buffer area is determined, the young have fledged, or the nest is determined to have failed. BIO-2e Hawks and owls nest earlier than most other native birds. If initial construction activities, ground disturbance, or vegetation clearing involving vegetation removal/trimming occurs from December 1 through August 31, the nest monitor would conduct a pre-construction survey within three days prior to vegetation 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-56 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR removal or other construction-related disturbances focused on actively nesting hawks or owls. If any actively nesting hawks or owls are found, a 500-foot buffer would be established around the nest tree to help ensure that nesting is not disrupted. The buffer would be delineated by orange construction fencing and signage and would remain in place until the nest is either abandoned or the young have fledged. The nest monitor would be present when any buffer fencing is established. Residual Impacts Impacts to most of the sensitive wildlife species known or expected to occur on the Project Site would be mitigated through the replacement and enhancement of existing functions on the Project Site, making them less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Implementation of the proposed mitigation would further reduce impacts to individuals of most of the sensitive species known or potentially present on the Project Site. Impacts to the federally threatened VPFS are best mitigated via the replacement and improvement of functions of occupied habitat (MM BIO-1a). The chance of failure for the proposed habitat restoration and enhancement would require adaptive management strategies that could include additional inoculations with existing VPFS inoculums and additional habitat enhancement. The loss of an unspecified number of individuals of the federally threatened VPFS would not result in a substantial and irreversible significant impact to the entire population, and therefore, impacts to this species are considered to be a significant but mitigable Class II) impact. This species would further require and receive additional protection through the Section 7 Incidental Take permitting process. Implementation of mitigation measures such as habitat replacement and enhancement (MM BIO- 1a), worker orientation (MM BIO-2a), pre-construction surveys for sensitive species (MM BIO- 2c) would reduce impacts to sensitive plant species to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). With implementation of mitigation measures including habitat replacement and enhancement MM BIO-1a), worker orientation (MM BIO-2a), pre-construction surveys for aquatic and semi- aquatic species (MM BIO-2c), establishment and delineation of construction exclusion zones MM BIO-2b) potential impacts to special-status aquatic and semi-aquatic vertebrate species, including the south-central California coast steelhead, two-striped garter snake, western pond turtle, and CRLF would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Incidental take of nesting birds and violations of the MBTA can be minimized or avoided through timing of various remediation and construction activities (MM BIO 2d and 2e) and pre- Project surveys (MM BIO 2d and 2e) to locate and avoid active bird nests. Such impacts would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Exposing biological receptors to the maximum concentrations of TPH and PAH detected in the field predicted no or only minor levels of effects. Reducing the amount of available contaminated material via removal or capping would also reduce the potential for exposure risk. Excluding wildlife from exposed contaminated material and suitable handling of contaminated material during the remediation activities would reduce exposure risks during the remediation 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-57 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR phase. Impacts resulting from exposure to contaminated materials during or after remediation activities to sensitive wildlife or plant species are therefore, expected to be less than significant Class III). Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.3 Site remediation and restoration could result in short-term and permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. Remediation Class II The proposed remediation and restoration would result in both short-term and permanent loss of sensitive habitats including native perennial grassland, seasonal wet meadow, freshwater marsh, and willow-cottonwood (CEMC 2007). In addition, the Project remediation and restoration efforts would result in impacts to San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries which are known steelhead habitat and are considered an integral component of the south-central coast steelhead ESU. Table 4.2-6, below includes impacted acreages of these communities based on information from the Project Execution Plan. Activities that would cause disturbance to these habitats include excavation, backfilling, ripping with a backhoe, widening existing roads, and capping remediated areas with soil. The re-alignment of Santa Fe Road from San Luis Obispo Creek north to Tank Farm Road would include road widening with sidewalks on both sides, and the installation of an arched culvert over San Luis Obispo Creek. Impacts on those sensitive habitats that support federally and state-listed species, as well as special-status species, are discussed in Impacts BIO.1 and BIO.2. Impacts to federal wetlands are described in impact BIO.4. Native Grasslands On the Project Site, native grassland is primarily present in the northeastern portion of the Project Site and is described as Serpentine Bunchgrass Grassland (Padre 2009). Purple needlegrass is primarily found in the far northeastern portion of the site in association with the ultramafic outcrop and derivative soils. Smaller populations are found in the southern portion of the north parcel near Tank Farm Road. Purple needlegrass grassland occupies 11.5 acres at the Project Site (Padre 2008c). Approximately 8.8 acres of the Project Site is composed of grassland with a significant component of the native perennial bunchgrass, being purple needlegrass Figure 4.2-4). Within any given square meter, the percent cover of purple needlegrass varies from zero percent to as high as 80 percent. Grasslands containing ten percent cover or greater by native grasses are considered sensitive by the CDFW, as well as the City of San Luis Obispo EDAW 1999). Padre (2009) reports that 6.73 acres of purple needlegrass would be impacted by remediation and restoration efforts. The proposed restoration and mitigation for impacts to native grasslands as described in the Conceptual Restoration Plan uses the following approach: 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-58 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR emerging theories regarding California’s pre-european landscape suggests that, rather than extensive bunch grasslands, extensive forb fields occupied the open slopes and foothills of the Coast Ranges and Sierra Nevada (Minnich 2008). Therefore this Basis of Design Report calls for the restoration of extensive forb fields with selected native grasslands in the uplands.” Wetlands The Padre 2008 wetland delineation and subsequent revisions and clarifications (Padre 2013b and 2013b) determined that there were 52.9 acres of USACE Jurisdictional wetlands and waters, 19.2 acres of isolated, non-USACE jurisdictional wetlands/waters, and an additional 16.85 acres of one-parameter wetlands for a total of 88.95 acres of one-parameter wetlands on the Project Site (Padre 2008c). The CDFW and USFWS use the one-parameter wetland definition. Padre 2013c) states that the proposed remediation and restoration efforts would result in impacts to 29.04 acres of Waters of the U.S. including federal waters/wetland areas (Table 4.2-7). The Project would result in impacts to 42.93 acres of one-parameter wetlands. In addition, accidental spills and sediment and erosion from construction areas could flow into sensitive wetland habitats. Table 4.2-7 Estimated Impacts to Wetlands/Waters of the U.S. including Federal and State Wetlands USACE Jurisdictional Wetlands/ Waters of the U.S. Isolated Wetlands/Waters non USACE jurisdictional) Additional One- Parameter Wetlands Total Acres on Project Site 52.9 acres 19.2 acres 16.85 acres 88.95 acres Acres of Proposed disturbance 29.04 acres 7.88 acres 6.01 acres 42.93 acres Source: Padre 2013c, Padre and WSP 2008 The proposed restoration efforts include a re-alignment of Tank Farm Creek so as to improve hydrologic function from its existing configuration. The east and west forks of Tank Farm Creek would be routed into the North Marsh. The existing culverts that cross under Tank Farm Road would be abandoned, and a weir would be installed in box culverts to force water to pond in the North Marsh, which would thereby reduce the magnitude of the peak flow. Tank Farm Creek would be relocated to follow the course of the former auxiliary channel (away from the western property line), and a low-flow outlet would be installed within the existing culvert so that it releases water in a controlled manner earlier in a storm. In the southeastern portion of the Project, the proposed plan includes removing earthen “plugs” that separate wetland habitat from the East Fork San Luis Obispo Creek channel system, and thus re-engage them through grading and recontouring of the channels based on the historical contours of the creek system. The intended outcome of these riparian corridor restoration efforts would result in short term impacts to habitat and species inhabiting these areas but an overall improvement in habitat quality and function in the long term. Mitigation Measure BIO-1b requires updated surveys of sensitive species habitats (including VPFS habitat) immediately prior to the onset of any ground disturbances in order to refine the 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-59 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR final habitat mitigation replacement acreages. The loss of VPFS habitat is a subset of the total loss of Waters of the U.S. and wetlands described below. Steelhead (Evolutionary Sensitive Unit (ESU)) San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries are known steelhead habitat and are considered an integral component of the south-central coast steelhead ESU. Although riparian habitat associated with the steelhead ESU would be temporarily disturbed during the restoration phase of the Project, there are no long term impacts to this habitat and it is expected that the proposed restoration approach, described in the Conceptual Restoration Plan, which focuses special attention on improving the current faunal support and habitat functions, would substantially increase habitat value for this portion of the Steelhead ESU. Mitigation Measures BIO-3a The final restoration plan shall require a 2:1 replacement of all native grassland as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and CDFW) impacted by remediation efforts of the Project (at least 6.73 impacted acres as described in Padre 2008c). Implementation of the native grassland restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-3b The final restoration plan shall require a 1:1 replacement of all Waters/wetlands of the U.S. and one-parameter wetlands (42.93 acres) temporarily impacted by remediation and restoration efforts) . Implementation of the wetland and habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-3c Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate that all staging areas, equipment storage areas, stockpile sites, and refueling areas are located at least 100 feet from surface water bodies and wetland habitats to minimize the potential for releases into surface water or wetland habitat. BIO-3d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for approval to the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building. The final plan shall be revised as necessary to include any updated contours of the final grading as determined in the final restoration plan. The SWPPP shall adequately mitigate any potential impacts resulting from storm water flow into sensitive habitats. The SWPPP shall ensure that all remediation and restoration activities, especially those activities occurring within the riparian and stream corridors that could result in turbidity or release of contaminated material into sensitive habitats employ measures such as sediment fences or other containment devices and construction best management practices to minimize the potential for impacts to sensitive habitats. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-60 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts Native grasslands: Mitigation measure BIO-1a requires the preparation and approval of a final restoration plan that would include details on the restoration and monitoring of native grassland habitat. Mitigation measure BIO-3a requires a 2:1 replacement of native grassland habitat disturbed during the remediation and restoration activities. The Conceptual Restoration Plan states that impacts to the sensitive native grassland habitat would be offset by the creation of approximately 45.2 acres of forb field habitat (which would greatly exceed the 2:1 or 3:1 replacement ratio that is typical mitigation for impacts to this habitat). This proposed restoration would improve overall general functions and values of habitat disturbed during remediation and restoration efforts and would also improve the functionality of the other existing open grassland on the Project Site. In addition, BIO-3a would require the 2:1 replacement ratio for all impacts to native grasslands as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and the CDFW due to the temporal loss of this sensitive habitat and the potential for failure in restoration efforts. The implementation of the recommended restoration effort would reduce impacts to native grasslands to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Wetlands: The implementation of the restoration plan would result in a 1:1 replacement ratio for wetlands impacted due to Project remediation and restoration disturbances (Table 4.2-7). The Applicant-proposed mitigation included in the Conceptual Restoration Plan accounted for restoring 55.63 acres) for remediation and restoration impacts. The EIR-proposed mitigation requires a 1:1 habitat replacement for a total of 42.93 acres for one-parameter wetland impacts. It is expected that some of the replaced wetland habitat would also be suitable habitat for VPFS BIO-1c requires the restoration of 12.9 acres of VPFS habitat). However, even if none of the VPFS habitat can be delineated as one-parameter wetland, the expected Applicant proposed acreage of 55.63 acres would be ample to replace both the required VPFS habitat and the one- parameter wetland requirement even if there was no overlap. The wetland habitat would further require and receive additional protection through the Section 404 permitting process. With the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the impact to wetlands would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Steelhead ESU: The final restoration plan shall be designed to improve the value and function of the existing riparian ecosystem. The restored habitat within the riparian habitat and the adjoining watershed shall mitigate the temporary disturbance to habitats comprising potential movement and dispersal habitat for migratory fish. As such, the movement and dispersal habitat would be restored and would function as a habitat linkage for dispersal of migratory fish species. This sensitive habitat would further require and receive additional protection through consultation with the NMFS during the Section 404 permitting process. With the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the impact to the steelhead ESU wetlands would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-61 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.4 Site remediation would adversely affect federal wetlands as defined in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and State Wetlands. Remediation Class II The proposed remediation would affect federally protected wetland areas within the Project Site, including natural watercourses, such as North Marsh, and man-made containment areas. Remediation activities that would cause disturbance include excavation backfilling, ripping with a backhoe, widening existing roads, and capping remediated areas with soil. Proposed restoration activities are designed to improve the value and function of the existing on- site wetlands (Padre and WSP 2009). As detailed in the Conceptual Restoration Plan and clarified in Padre 2013c, the proposed remediation and restoration activities would impact a total of 29.04 acres of federal wetland habitat. The Applicant would obtain a Section 404 permit prior to disturbance of wetland areas. Consultation with the USFWS and NMFS would be completed during the Section 404 permitting process. The Applicant would comply with all measures issued by USFWS and NMFS for the Project. The potentially significant impact to wetlands would be mitigated with the proposed mitigation of 1:1 habitat replacement (MM BIO-3b). In addition, with the re-establishment of normal water flow throughout the site, other additional degraded wetlands could recover and provide additional habitat functions. Padre reports that an additional 11.37 acres of degraded habitat would recover naturally with the return of historical water connectivity (Padre and WSP 2009). The natural recovery of degraded wetlands, combined with mitigation measures, particularly restoration of on-site, existing wetlands, would further reduce this impact. Mitigation Measures BIO-4a The final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) shall be implemented to improve the value and function of existing wetlands on site that would result in a 1:1 ratio of restored wetlands to wetlands lost due to Project disturbances. Implementation of wetland restoration shall follow the plan, including locations of existing wetlands to be restored, restoration techniques, schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. The final plan shall also include a Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan (MM BIO-1c) that will include performance standards to assess whether the restored wetland habitats are functioning similar to pre-Project conditions. BIO-4b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain a Section 404 permit prior to disturbance of wetland areas. Consultation with the USFWS and NMFS shall be completed during the Section 404 permitting process. The Applicant shall comply with all measures issued by USFWS and NMFS for the Project. These measures could include, but are not limited to habitat restoration, habitat enhancement, biological resources training, biological monitoring, sensitive species relocation effort, restoration monitoring and reporting, and agency approval of restoration efforts. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-62 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts Mitigation measure BIO-1a requires the preparation and approval of a final restoration plan. The implementation of this plan would result in a 1:1 replacement ratio of restored wetlands to wetlands lost due to remediation and restoration disturbances. This sensitive habitat would further require and receive additional review through the Section 404 and Section 401 permitting process. With the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the impact to Federal wetlands would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.5 Site remediation and restoration would result in habitat alteration that precludes the re-establishment of native populations of plants and animals. Remediation Class II The proposed remediation would affect natural vegetation types and land use types, including annual grassland, native perennial grassland, coyote brush scrub, seasonal wet meadow, freshwater marsh, disturbed rock outcrop, seasonal wet meadow/tarflat, willow- cottonwood/concrete-asphalt, and developed areas (CEMC 2007). Table 4.2-8 includes impacted acreages based on information from the Project Execution Plan, some of which has been modified and updated in Padre 2008c. Although three types of vegetation types would be disturbed, all provide habitat for diverse native plants and animals described above. Activities that would cause disturbance are similar to those that would impact wetlands, including excavation backfilling, ripping with a backhoe, widening existing roads, and capping remediated areas with soil. Impacts on federally and state-listed species, as well as special-status species, are discussed in Impacts BIO.1 and BIO.2. Impacts to federal wetlands are described in impact BIO.4. Table 4.2-8 Preliminary Habitat Impacts of Remediation Project Habitat Type/Land Use Type Total Impacts acres) Annual grassland 98.92 Native perennial grassland 6.73* Coyote brush scrub 0.91 Mixed riparian 0.69 Freshwater marsh 12.49 Seasonal wet meadow 21.51 Disturbed rock outcrop 2.54 Seasonal wet meadow/tarflat 7.07 Willow-cottonwood/concrete-asphalt 0.32 Source: CEMC 2007 Source: Padre 2009 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-63 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Proposed restoration activities are designed to improve the value and function of the existing on- site wetlands, and to restore terrestrial ecosystems (Padre and WSP 2009). The restored wetlands and terrestrial vegetation types would mitigate the loss and disturbance to habitats for non- sensitive, native populations of plants and animals. Re-establishment of such species would not be precluded. Mitigation in the form of restoration of natural vegetation types would mitigate the impacts. The potential preclusion of the re-establishment of populations of native plants and animals is a potentially significant impact that can be mitigated. Implementation of the proposed mitigation MM BIO-3b) would result in a 1:1 replacement of wetland habitat disturbed by remediation activities. In addition, as discussed in impact BIO.4, after more natural water-flow connectivity is re-established after restoration, some degraded wetlands would recover naturally, resulting in 11.37 acres of improved wetlands (Padre and WSP 2009). The overall results of the mitigation proposed in this EIR and the general approach proposed in the Conceptual Restoration Plan would result in improved habitats for native populations of plants and animals as follows (Padre and WSP 2009): Phreatophytic (deep rooted plants that derive water from ground water) woodland – 4.0 acres; Mixed hardwood/forb field – 27.0 acres; Coastal sage chaparral – 10.9 acres; and Forb field – 45.2 acres. The restoration of wetlands and terrestrial vegetation types would provide sufficient habitat for native plants and animals to re-establish, as necessary to compensate for Project-related impacts. Mitigation Measures BIO-5a The terrestrial ecosystem portion of the final restoration plan shall include success criteria for re-establishing populations of native plants and wildlife. BIO-5b The final restoration plan, shall be implemented to restore at least 4.0 acres of phreatophytic woodland, 27.0 acres of mixed hardwood/forb field, 10.9 acres of coastal scrub chaparral, and 45.2 acres of forb field (Padre and WSP 2009). Implementation of the terrestrial habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-5c The function of the restored terrestrial habitats shall be monitored. A Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be developed and appended to the final restoration plan. The habitat management and evaluation plan shall include methods to determine if the restored areas are meeting success criteria per the approved restoration plan. The complementary plan shall include surveys to monitor the occurrence of native plants and animals in restored habitats relative to their occurrence in similar onsite habitats prior to, or unaffected by, remediation and development. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-64 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts Implementing these mitigation measures would reduce the likelihood that the Project would preclude the re-establishment of populations of native plants and wildlife, either from Project- specific impacts, or from a broader, region-wide perspective. The impacts to the habitat would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.6 Site remediation and restoration would temporarily impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi- aquatic wildlife species. Remediation Class II As described in the Project Execution Plan, the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and associated Acacia Creek bordering the Project Site could be components of a migration corridor and habitat linkage for wildlife species within the region (CEMC 2007). These migration corridors are especially important because they are within an area where residential development and associated concentration of human activities have a tendency to impair the movement of species between habitat areas. Although the natural riparian scrub in the Acacia Creek riparian zone is discontinuous and wildlife habitat is fragmented, the wildlife habitat value is moderate due to its importance maintaining continuity with riparian habitats of the nearby East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and San Luis Obispo Creek to the west (CEMC 2007). The Project Execution Plan also indicates that the existing riverine/slope wetlands associated with the North Marsh may also allow the dispersal of aquatic and semi-aquatic organisms CEMC 2007). The North Marsh habitat feature may be utilized by medium- to large-sized mammals (e.g., mule deer and coyote) as a movement corridor between the Project Site and the adjacent South Hills Conservation Area to the northeast. Other faunal groups that could be impacted by remediation and development include migratory birds and fish. The East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and associated tributaries (i.e., Acacia Creek) are known to support steelhead. Thus, there is potential for Project-related activities to affect or impair the movement of migratory fish. Migratory birds utilize the Project Site during migration and wintering periods, particularly when seasonal water is present. The proposed remediation Project would affect natural vegetation types, including wetlands and terrestrial habitats that could contribute to the movement and dispersal corridors (referred to as migration corridors and habitat linkages) in the region. Activities that would cause disturbance include excavation backfilling, ripping with a backhoe, widening existing roads, and capping remediated areas with soil. The remediation-related impacts to habitats would be temporary in nature and would be mitigated by restoration of on-site wetlands and terrestrial habitats. A final restoration plan, based on the proposed plan, shall be designed to improve the value and function of the existing on-site wetlands, and to restore terrestrial ecosystems (Padre and WSP 2009). The restored wetlands and terrestrial vegetation types shall mitigate the temporary disturbance to habitats comprising potential movement and dispersal habitat for migratory fish and wildlife species. As 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-65 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR such, the movement and dispersal habitat would be restored and would function as habitat linkages for dispersal of migratory fish and wildlife species. Considering that the current value of existing habitats on site is “moderate,” the restored habitats on site would create habitat linkages similar or better than pre-Project conditions. Mitigation Measures BIO-6a The terrestrial ecosystem portion of the final restoration plan shall be reviewed and approved by the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo Natural Resources Manager. The plan shall include provisions to maintain and re-establish habitat linkages. BIO-6b The final restoration plan shall include consideration of on-site natural habitats and linkages to off-site, adjacent habitats, especially the South Hills Conservation Area. Residual Impact The recommended mitigation measures would reduce impairment to movement, migration, and dispersal of migratory fish and wildlife species. To the extent possible, remediation activities shall be conducted outside of wintering season (MM BIO-1f) when disturbances to creeks and seasonal wetlands could have a potentially substantial effect on habitat linkages at a critical time of year for migrating wildlife. Remediation and restoration efforts would not substantially impair the corridors and habitat linkages used by such species. With the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the impact to wildlife migration and dispersal would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.7 Site remediation and restoration have the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. Remediation Class II Project implementation would include vegetation removal for remediation and restoration efforts. The immediate biological effects of excavations, pipeline removals, and re-grading for the purposes of restoration would be the permanent and essentially total loss of the plants and wildlife that exist within most of the graded areas. The more mobile wildlife species may be able to escape immediate mortality, but in most cases the long-term effect of increased competition for resources in nearby preserved areas would be a net loss of the number of individuals of each species displaced from the area of grading. Any construction activities or site visits occurring at night due to security, emergency or unexpected situations (e.g., security, night patrol, emergency actions, storm-water control, and over-night dewatering efforts) would increase the chance of wildlife mortalities on roads and access corridors because that is when a large number of wildlife species are most active. Any temporary loss of habitat would also reduce foraging habitat for species with larger home ranges. Table 4.2- for BIO.5 quantifies the maximum area of each plant 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-66 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR community that would be subject to disturbances due to remediation activities. Proposed restoration activities are designed to improve the value and function of the existing habitat, and to restore terrestrial ecosystems (Padre and WSP 2009). The increased acreages and the expected net gain in ecosystem functions would mitigate the temporary loss and disturbances to plant and animal populations on the Project Site and in the general Project area. Wildlife species are fully expected to recolonize restored areas. The success monitoring of restoration areas would partially be based on the return to functions as they relate to wildlife use. Any deviations from producing fully functioning habitat would require adaptive management. Because much of the current value of existing habitats on site is “moderate,” the restoration of on-site habitats are expected to actually increase the diversity and abundance of plant and wildlife populations. Mitigation Measures BIO-7a A qualified biologist shall conduct surveys throughout areas proposed to be disturbed to determine the presence of wildlife species prior to ground disturbance. The biologist shall be on site during initial site disturbances (i.e., brush removal, top soil disturbances). Wildlife species encountered during the initial disturbances shall be relocated to suitable habitat out of potential danger. All handling and relocation of sensitive and non-sensitive wildlife species shall be conducted by biologists with appropriate authorizations and permits (CDFW and USFWS). Remediation activities, including restoration efforts shall be regularly monitored throughout the remediation and restoration phases to ensure that wildlife species have not entered work areas. The biological monitor shall conduct regular site inspections of the remediation and restoration activities to ensure that all applicable mitigation measures are being enacted. The biological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt activities if permit requirements and conditions are not being met. The biological monitor shall prepare an annual summary report describing site visit observations and shall provide this report to the City, County, and regulatory agencies (including CDFW, USACE, and USFWS) for review. BIO-7b To minimize the potential for road mortality of wildlife, all nighttime traffic shall be minimized during the remediation and restoration phases and permitted only for activities required for safety reasons, emergencies, or equipment staging and vehicle maintenance necessary to comply with traffic and air quality mitigation measures; all hauling activities shall be restricted to daylight hours, defined as the hours after sunrise and before sunset. BIO-7c The Stockpiling Plan required by Mitigation Measure WR-3c shall also include methods to keep wildlife from coming into contact with stockpiled contaminated soils. Residual Impact The recommended mitigation measures would eventually restore, enhance, and increase functions for existing plant and wildlife habitats on the Project Site in the long-term if site restoration is successful. However, the restoration efforts would require several years for the restored habitat to become mature enough to provide adequate functions and values for plants and wildlife species. These short-term impacts are mitigated through increased replacement ratios for the more sensitive habitat types (i.e., wetlands, sensitive species habitat, and native 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-67 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR grasslands). With the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the impact to plant and wildlife populations diversity and abundance would be less than significant with mitigation Class II). 4.2.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The development of the Project under the City Development Plan would include approximately 803,000 square feet of commercial and industrial floor area with associated parking, landscaping, open space, bicycle and pedestrian trails. The City development could also include land for the City to construction public facilities such as a transit maintenance yard and storage faculty or a fire station and training facility. The development for each of these land use designations under the City Development Plan would predominantly consist of offices and light manufacturing facilities. The development would occur in five phases and take place over a 2 to 25 year period. Many of the impacts to biological resources within the City Development Plan footprint would have already occurred during the remediation phase of activities and would likewise be mitigated with the described mitigation for each impact. Those impacts which would occur in the remediation phase are included in the discussions below but do not have the Summary Box statement of impact with new impact numbers, descriptions, and class. Impact statements and accompanying Impact Summary are only included below for new impacts or substantially different levels (i.e., different Impact Class) of City Development Plan Impacts. Sensitive Species Habitat: The proposed City Development Plan components of the Project would include permanent conversion of sensitive species habitat to commercial, recreational, and open space uses and would include impacts to sensitive plant species habitats. These species habitats would be impacted during the initial remediation phase of activities. The Development phase of activities would result in permanent loss of these species’ habitat. However, MM BIO 1a 1b, and 1c requires the replacement of all these species habitats and therefore mitigates long term/permanent loss of habitat. Sensitive Plant Habitat: The City Development Plan would permanently impact approximately 5.57 total acres of habitat for Cambria morning glory and 4.14 acres of purple needlegrass, as shown in Table 4.2-9. Table 4.2-9 Estimated Impacts to Rare Plant Species and Sensitive Habitat Areas Species Development Impacts acres) Mitigation Area acres) Cambria morning glory Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis 5.57 8.2 San Luis Obispo owl’s clover Castilleja densiflora ssp. obispoensis 0.00 7.2 Congdon’s tarplant Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii 0.00 11.88 San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya Dudleya abramsii ssp. bettinae 0.00 0.00 Salvage and curation 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-68 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-9 Estimated Impacts to Rare Plant Species and Sensitive Habitat Areas Species Development Impacts acres) Mitigation Area acres) Hoover’s button-celery Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri 0.00 1,000 ft2 Purple Needlegrass Nassella pulchra 4.14 To be included in all upland restoration Total 9.71 Notes : ft2 = square feet Source: Padre 2008b, Padre and WSP 2009 The permanent loss of native grassland habitat is discussed below in impact BIO.8. Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Habitat: The City Development Plans would be located in areas with occupied VPFS habitat, therefore resulting in a permanent loss of this species’ habitat. In addition, several ponded areas representing suitable VPFS habitat that did not have any evidence of use by this species but could potentially be used in the future would also be permanently lost in the development of area. This species habitat would be impacted during the initial remediation phase of activities. The Development phase of activities would result in permanent loss of these species’ habitat. However, MM BIO 1c requires the replacement of this species habitat at a 1:1 replacement ratio and preserves this habitat in perpetuity, therefore mitigating long term/permanent loss of habitat. Implementation of the final restoration plan accounts for this permanent loss of VPFS and wetland habitat; MM BIO-1a requires the 1:1 replacement of all VPFS habitat that is disturbed and would therefore re-establish habitat for listed and special-status plants. The habitat enhancement and restoration efforts and the proposed mitigation measures discussed under impact BIO.1 would restore other suitable portions of the Project Site with treatments that would mitigate the development impacts to sensitive species habitat to less than significant. 4.2.5.1 City Development Plan Impacts to Sensitive Species The impacts to listed species, special-status species, and species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act resulting from the proposed City Development Plan portions of the overall Project would be similar to what is described for the remediation phase of work except that sensitive species habitat in the development area would not be able to be restored. Impacts to sensitive wildlife species known or expected to occur on the Project Site would be impacted during the initial remediation phase of activities and would likewise be mitigated through the replacement and enhancement of existing functions on the remainder of the Project Site (MM BIO-1 and 3). Implementation of the proposed mitigation described for BIO.2 would further reduce impacts to individuals of sensitive species known or potentially present on the Project Site. Because the City development phase of work is proposed in only a small portion of and currently, unoccupied VPFS habitat and this habitat would be replaced via the proposed 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-69 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR mitigation restoration, the impacts to individuals of the federally threatened VPFS would be mitigated to less than significant (Class II). 4.2.5.2 City Development Plan Impacts to Sensitive Habitats Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.8 The City Development Plan would result in a permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. Development Class II The City Development Plan would result in the permanent loss of biological function of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. Purple needlegrass is primarily found in the far northeastern portion of the Project Site, in association with the ultramafic outcrop and derivative soils. Purple needlegrass grassland occupies 11.5 acres at the Project Site (Padre 2008c). Valley needlegrass grassland has been ranked by the CNDDB globally as G1which is considered extremely endangered and means that less than 2,000 acres of this habitat exists worldwide. Although the remediation phase would disturb some of this habitat, the development phase of the Project would result in the permanent loss of 4.14 acres of this sensitive habitat. Mitigation measure BIO-3a requires a 2:1 replacement of all native grassland impacted by remediation efforts of the project (at least 4.14 impacted acres as described in Padre 2008c). The Conceptual Restoration Plan proposes mitigation for the loss of needlegrass bunch grass by including this species in the general seed species mix, outplanting over 6,500 one-gallon containers of needlegrass bunch grass, and calls for the restoration of extensive forb fields (45.2 acres, greatly exceeding the 2:1 or 3:1 replacement ratio that is typical mitigation for impacts to this habitat) with selected native grasslands in the upland portion of the restoration efforts. All of this effort, after the short term impacts of restoration, would greatly improve and enhance the overall functions of the existing native grassland community on the Project Site, therefore reducing this impact to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). The EIR-proposed mitigation (MM BIO-3a) requires a 1:1 habitat replacement for a total of 42.93 acres for one-parameter wetland impacts. Table 4.2-10 provides the area of impacts for the development phase of the project. Loss of wetland habitat in the development phase would represent a permanent loss of this habitat. In addition to the impacts to native grasslands, sensitive plant and wildlife habitats and populations in the vicinity of the City Development Plan footprint would be exposed to construction related noises, trash, dust, and human presence throughout the duration of the construction phase which could consist of periods of disturbances lasting up to 25 years. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-70 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.2-10 Area of Development Phase Wetland Impacts USACE Jurisdictional Wetlands/Waters Isolated wetlands/waters non USACE- jurisdictional) Additional One- parameter wetlands CDFW and USFWS) Total Acres on Site 52.9 acres 19.2 acres 16.85 acres 88.95 acres Area of Disturbances during remediation and restoration) 29.04 acres 7.88 acres 6.01 acres 42.93 acres Area of Development Impacts 1.83 acres 1.02 acres 0.86 acres 3.71 acres The operation phase of the development area would also result in increased human presence, increased lighting, and new and increased usage of the roads and bike paths near plant and wildlife habitat (i.e., vernal pools, native grasslands, and fairy shrimp habitat) that are extremely sensitive to disturbances. Mitigation Measures BIO-8a The final restoration plan shall include criteria that would require the restoration of at least a 2:1 replacement ratio (4.14 acres as defined by Padre 2008c) of all native grasslands” habitat permanently lost in the development elements of the project. Restored native grassland habitat shall meet standards and criteria as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and CDFW within the proposed restoration of 45.2 acres of forb field habitat. Implementation of the terrestrial habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. BIO-8b The function of the restored native grassland habitats shall be monitored. A Long- Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be developed and appended to the final restoration plan. The habitat management and evaluation plan shall include methods to determine if the restored areas are meeting success criteria per the approved restoration plan including criteria of plant and wildlife species in restored habitats and to compare such results to pre-Project conditions. The complementary plan shall include surveys to monitor the occurrence of native plants and animals in restored habitats relative to their occurrence in similar habitats prior to remediation and development. BIO-8c Hikers, pets, and bikers shall be excluded from sensitive habitats within the Project Site. The final SLO City and County-approved restoration plan shall include a fencing plan element with specific details on location, requirements of permanent and seasonal exclusion zones, and type of fencing to ensure that wildlife movement is not restricted. The fencing plan shall include information on placement of signs, educational placards, type of fencing required, method of 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-71 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR exclusions, and monitoring and repair of exclusion devices, and shall include, at the least, a description and figure of those areas (i.e., VPFS habitat, vernal pool habitat, riparian habitat, and habitat in the process of being restored) that would require full time exclusion. BIO-8d The final restoration plan shall require a 2:1 replacement of the 3.71 acres of USACE Jurisdictional Waters/wetlands, isolated waters/wetlands, and one- parameter wetlands (for a replacement of 7.42 acres) permanently impacted by the City Development Plan. Implementation of the wetland and habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. Residual Impacts Implementation of Mitigation Measures and BIO -3a through 3c and BIO-8a through 8d would reduce permanent City Development Plan impacts to sensitive habitats.. MM AE-3b requires the preparation and approval of a lighting operation schedule that would describe the number, location and amounts of lights, and the proposed hours of operation for the entire property. The lighting schedule shall propose the minimum number of lights, level of illuminance, and hours of operation allowed by City codes and ordinances, including the City’s Night Sky Ordinance. The approved lighting schedule shall become a required condition of the lease between the property owner and the tenant. Implementation of Mitigation Measures and BIO-3a through 3c, BIO-8a through 8d, and MM AE-3b would reduce City Development Plan impacts to sensitive habitats to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.2.5.3 City Development Plan Impacts to Federal Wetlands The City Development Plan component of the Project would permanently impact 1.83 acres of Waters of the U.S. including Federal wetland areas as defined in Section 401 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Such areas would be converted permanently to other land uses. Unlike the remediation phase, no wetland areas would be restored in place. Therefore, there would be no temporary impacts. Mitigation measure BIO-3b requires that disturbed wetland habitat be restored at a 1:1 replacement ratio, that restoration efforts focus results on a net gain of functioning wetland habitat, and that all of the restored areas be preserved in perpetuity. The habitat enhancement and restoration efforts and the proposed mitigation measures discussed under impacts BIO.1 and BIO.3 would restore other suitable portions of the Project Site with treatments that would mitigate the development impacts to Federal wetlands to less than significant. In addition, as required in Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, an application for a Section 404 Permit would also require certification from the RWQCB that the activity would not adversely affect water quality. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-72 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2.5.4 City Development Plan Impacts to Habitats that Would Affect Native Populations of Plants and Animals. The City Development Plan portion of the Project would have the potential to result in habitat alteration that precludes the re-establishment of native populations of plants and animals. According to the Project Execution Plan, the City Development Plan would result in impacts to native vegetation types, similar to the impacts of the remediation Project (CEMC 2007). The City Development Plan would result in a permanent loss of habitats within the area of development and would therefore, preclude wildlife or plant species from recolonizing these areas. However, the proposed restoration activities for the entire Project area are designed to improve the value and function of the existing on-site terrestrial ecosystems. The restored habitats throughout the entire Project area would mitigate the loss and disturbance to habitats for native populations of plants and animals in the City Development Plan portion of the Project boundary. Mitigation in the form of restoration of natural vegetation types would mitigate the impacts to native wildlife and plant species. The potential preclusion of re-establishment of populations of native plants and animals is a potentially significant impact that can be mitigated to less than significant (Class II). 4.2.5.5 City Development Plan Impacts to Wildlife Migration and Dispersal Impact Impact Description Project Phase Residual Impact BIO.9 The City Development Plan would permanently impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi- aquatic wildlife species. Development Class II The City Development Plan would result in impacts that could permanently impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi-aquatic wildlife species. The City Development Plan would result in impacts similar, although greater, than those described in the remediation phase. The development would result in a permanent loss of native vegetation types in the northeastern portion of the Project Site that comprise movement and dispersal habitat to numerous wildlife species. Permanent structures, buildings, and bike paths and increased human presence in the area would reduce or eliminate the ability for wildlife species to freely move through the area. In addition, the City Development Plan on the eastern portion of the Project Site is near the riparian habitat associated with Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek which are expected to support a large portion of wildlife movement in the general area. The restoration of native habitats would assist in maintaining and re-establishing corridors and habitat linkages that can be used by migrating and dispersing animals. Protection measures reducing the threat of sedimentation and erosion and restoration of the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek would reduce the level of impacts to migratory fish. The amounts to be restored include (Padre and WSP 2009): Wetlands – 45.67 acres; Phreatophytic woodland – 4.0 acres; 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-73 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mixed hardwood/forb field – 27.0 acres; Coastal sage chaparral – 10.9 acres; and Forb field – 45.2 acres. Mitigation Measures BIO-9a To reduce impacts to wildlife migration, the Applicant shall include in the approved final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) landscape designs for planting of native vegetation along the northern portion of the City Development Plan area. The native vegetation landscaping shall be designed to provide wildlife species cover and refuge during migration. The landscaping shall be designed to shield migrating wildlife from human presence, noise, and lighting from residential and recreational activities in the City and County Development Plan footprint. Due to the 2 to 25 year duration of development phase, such planting shall occur on the onset of the development phase. BIO-9b To reduce cumulative impacts to wildlife migration the Applicant shall include in the final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) a fencing plan element with specific details on location and requirements for the purpose of restricting wildlife movement through the development area but allowing movement through the open space areas. Residual Impacts The recommended mitigation measures would reduce impairment to movement, migration, and dispersal of migratory fish and wildlife species. To the extent possible, remediation activities shall be conducted outside of wintering season (MM BIO-1f) when disturbances to creeks and seasonal wetlands would have a potentially substantial effect on habitat linkages at a critical time of year for migrating aquatic wildlife. Mitigation that restricts public access into sensitive habitat portions of open space areas (MM BIO-8c) would reduce some of the effects of increased human presence in natural areas. With the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the impact to wildlife migration and dispersal would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.2.5.6 City Development Plan Impacts to Plant and Animal Populations Impact Impact Description Phase Residual Impact BIO.10 The City Development Plan has the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. Development Class II The City Development Plan would result in impacts that have the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. The City Development Plan element of the Project would include vegetation removal and a permanent loss of plant and wildlife habitat. The effects of construction activities would result in a permanent and total loss of the plants and wildlife that exist within the graded areas. Any permanent loss of habitat would also reduce foraging habitat for species with larger home ranges. In addition, plant and wildlife populations in the vicinity of the City Development Plan footprint would be exposed to construction related noises, trash, dust, and human presence throughout the duration of the 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-74 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR construction phase which could consist of periods of disturbances lasting up to 25 years. The operation phase of the City Development Plan area would also result in increased human presence, increased lighting, and increased usage of the roads and bike paths near plant and wildlife habitat (i.e. vernal pools, native grasslands, and fairy shrimp habitat) that are extremely sensitive to disturbances. Mitigation that restricts public access into the sensitive habitat portions of open space areas (MM BIO-8c) would reduce some of the effects of increased human presence in natural areas. The Applicant-proposed and recommended Restoration Plan (MM BIO-1a) would restore, enhance, and increase functions for existing plant and wildlife habitats on the Project Site. Mitigation Measure BIO-10 Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City for approval. All Project lighting shall be designed to shielded spillage of light into adjacent preserved open space areas. Any structural part of the light fixture providing this shielding shall be permanently affixed. Outdoor lighting for buildings shall be restricted to lights required by code for lighting building exteriors and for safety and security needs. The lighting for the ball field shall not be on during period when there are no activities at the fields. In no case shall the lights at the ball fields be on between the hours of midnight and 7:00 AM. After initial installation of Project lighting, a City-approved biologist shall conduct a field inspection to confirm that the proper lamps have been installed and that light spillage into Open Space areas has been minimized to the maximum extent feasible without compromising safety or other critical night-lighting requirements. Residual Impacts Implementation of the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration, and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures (Mitigation measures BIO-7a, 7b, and 9a) would reduce the impact to plant and wildlife population’s diversity and abundance to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.2.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The County Development Plan component of the Project would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space, and 370,000 sq. ft. for service and light manufacturing businesses. The County Development Plan differs from the City Development Plan in that it would include the construction of an on-site wastewater treatment plant on approximately one acre located within the same boundary as the City Development Plan envelope. In addition, the County Development Plan would rely on use of groundwater drawn from wells on the Project Site for water. Analysis of impacts for the County Development Plan elements of the Project considered all of the seven bulleted significance criteria listed in Section 4.2.3. Many of the impacts to biological resources within the County Development Plan footprint would have already occurred during the remediation phase of activities and would likewise be mitigated with the described mitigation for each impact. Those impacts which would occur during the remediation component of the Project are included in the discussions below but do not have the Summary Box statement of impact 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-75 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR with new impact numbers, descriptions, and class. Impact statements and the accompanying Impact Summary are only included below for new impacts or substantially different levels (i.e., different Impact Class) of impact. All of the impacts described above for the remediation and City Development Plan components of the Project would be identical to the impacts resulting from the County Development Plan. Implementing the County Development Plan elements of the Project would result in: 1) temporary and permanent impacts to sensitive species habitat (impact BIO.1) through the loss of VPFS habitat; 2) the “take” of a federally-listed species (VPFS); fully-protected species; special-status species, or species protected by the MTBA (identical to those species described above under Impact BIO.2); 3) a permanent change in the extent or functional value of wetland and native grassland habitat Impact BIO.3); 4) adverse effects on federal wetlands (Impact BIO.4); 5) alteration or destruction of habitat for native populations of plants and animals (Impact BIO.5); 6) alteration or impairment of a migration corridor for resident and migratory wildlife species Impact BIO.6); and 7) a substantial loss of wildlife and plant habitat (Impact BIO.7). The recommended mitigation measures which focus on replacing and improving overall functions and values to the existing habitats on the Project Site that are discussed above (MM BIO -1 through BIO-10) would substantially reduce impacts to sensitive habitats, sensitive species, plant and wildlife populations, federal wetlands, wildlife migration patterns, and impairment to movement, migration, and dispersal of migratory fish and wildlife species. Implementing the mitigation measures would reduce most of these impacts to less than significant. The impacts resulting from the construction of the on-site wastewater treatment plant and drawing groundwater from on site are discussed below. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-76 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact Impact Description Phase Residual Impact BIO.11 The County Development Plan, specifically the wastewater treatment plant component would result in short-term and permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. Development Class II As detailed in the Chevron Tank Farm Development Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Feasibility Assessment (Heimel 2011, Appendix A.2) the on-site wastewater treatment and disposal facility would process wastewater generated by implementing the County Development Plan. The proposed wastewater treatment would include a variety of treatments including the use of spray fields, “polishing” wetlands (which would discharge into Tank Farm Creek, and/or live discharge into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek). The proposed wastewater discharge into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek would result in impacts to sensitive habitats, specifically, the riparian habitat and steelhead ESU located within San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries, which are known steelhead habitat and are considered an integral component of the south-central coast steelhead ESU. In addition, the use of open settling basins or “polishing“ wetlands would become attractive nuisances for both sensitive and common aquatic wildlife species, including sensitive amphibian species such as the federally threatened CRLF which is known to be present in tributaries of San Luis Obispo Creek, and federally listed VPFS which could become established in ponds. Potential impacts to water quality, sensitive habitats, and aquatic species downstream of proposed discharge location would include increased risk of spills and the accidental discharge of unfavorable water conditions including saline or chlorinated waters and/or the release of untreated water during high stormwater flows. Any of these scenarios have the potential to result in mortality or injury to aquatic species, interfere with sensitive life stages of aquatic and amphibious species, and reduce the functions of existing habitat within the Project area and downstream of the proposed discharge. It is expected that discharge into the East Fork of San Luis Creek would be required to be monitored, sampled, and meet specific standards that comply with RWQCB and NOAA Fisheries regulations. Impacts to sensitive resources and habitats would be expected only for accidental releases and high flow events during storm conditions. Mitigation Measures BIO-11a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a spill/discharge plan with specific measures that would prevent untreated discharge or accidental releases, such as saline or chlorinated water and/or untreated water during storm events into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek to reduce exposure risks to aquatic species located downstream of proposed discharge. The discharge plan shall be approved by the County and shall include specific measures such as the use of stormwater basins, a complete water sampling schedule, and methods for stormwater handling. BIO-11b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the Applicant shall demonstrate to the County that all open basins, including “polishing wetlands” or settling basins, that 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-77 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR would require regular maintenance and/or vegetation management, containing any Project-related fluids shall be designed to exclude all wildlife, including birds, bats, and amphibians. Residual Impacts Implementing mitigation measures, as well as preventative maintenance and routine sampling and inspections would reduce the likelihood and severity of potential spill and exposure impacts to sensitive biological resources to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact Impact Description Phase Residual Impact BIO.12 The County Development Plan, specifically the use of groundwater, would result in impacts to wetland areas and VPFS by drawing down surface water levels. Development Class III As part of the County Development Plan, water for the development would be provided by on- site groundwater wells. The water supply wells would be developed in the deep saturated zone greater than 50 feet below ground surface). The wetlands and VPFS habitat at the site are supported by water from the shallow saturated zone. To determine the degree of hydraulic communication between the shallow, and deep (e.g., greater than 50 feet) saturated zones, aquifer tests were performed on two properties situated along Tank Farm Road. These tests involved the installation of two “water supply” wells constructed in accordance with County of San Luis Obispo well construction standards (minimum annular seal depth of 50 feet). The tests were monitored by one or more observation wells completed in the shallow saturated zone (<30 feet) and located at varying distances and directions from the water supply wells. The water supply wells were pumped for 24 hours while water levels in both the supply and observation wells were continuously recorded using pressure transducers and data loggers. The aquifer tests revealed that sustained drawdowns in excess of 20 feet in the supply wells had no significant effect on water levels in the shallow saturated zone. The conclusion of both aquifer tests was that the degree of communication between the shallow and deep (e.g., greater than 50 feet) saturated zones is limited (Avocet 2011). This would indicate that use of the groundwater wells would not impact the wetlands or VPFS habitat. In addition, during the drought of 1987-1990, the City of San Luis Obispo pumped as much as 2,000 AFY from the groundwater basin at a time when groundwater recharge was at a very low level. Groundwater level at the Project Site during that time was 15 feet or less below normal groundwater levels, but within the normal fluctuations at the site (Cleath 2013). Based upon the historical wetland and VPFS surveys that have occurred at the Project Site, these normal fluctuations in groundwater have not appeared to impacts these wetland areas. Therefore, impacts of groundwater use at the site would be considered a less than significant impact to wetlands and VPFS habitat. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-78 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts The residual impacts would be less than significant (Class III). 4.2.7 Cumulative Impacts and Mitigation Measures As stated in Chapter 3.0, Cumulative Scenario and Methodology, under the CEQA Guidelines, a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental impact report (“EIR”) together with other projects causing related impacts.” Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in section 15065(c). The Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies specific City and County Development Plans that, depending on location and timing could, in combination with the proposed remediation, restoration and City and County Development Plan elements of the Project, result in cumulative impacts to biological resources. Each of the seven bulleted Significance Criteria included in Section 4.2.3 were considered as they relate to impacts to biological resources andare discussed in this section as they relate to the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts. 4.2.7.1 Cumulative Impacts to Sensitive Species Habitat Several of the Cumulative Projects listed in Table 3-1 would result in the loss of hundreds of acres of habitat, some of which is potentially used in various functions for sensitive plant and animal species. It is assumed that those projects converting open space, native and non-native grasslands, and agricultural fields to residential and commercial purposes would result in permanent conversion of sensitive species habitat to commercial, residential, and recreational uses and would include impacts to sensitive plant and wildlife species habitats. The City and County Development Plan components of the Project would result in the permanent loss of sensitive species habitat and would increase the cumulative impact to this resource. However, the implementation of the final restoration plan would re-establish and improve habitat for listed and special-status plants and wildlife within the Project Site. The habitat enhancement and restoration efforts and the proposed mitigation measures discussed under impact BIO.1 would restore suitable portions of the Project Site with treatments and would increase overall functions on the Project Site that would mitigate the remediation and County Development Plan impacts to sensitive species habitat to less than significant. Therefore, although the Project would result in impacts to sensitive species habitat, the overall long term impacts would be considered to have significant but mitigable contribution to cumulative impacts (Class II) to sensitive species habitat. 4.2.7.2 Cumulative Impacts to Sensitive Species Several of the Cumulative Projects listed in Table 3-1, combined, would result in the loss of hundreds of acres of both native and non-native habitats, some of which is potentially used in 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-79 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR various functions for sensitive plant and animal species. It is assumed that some of these projects would result in impacts to listed specimens, special-status species, and species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. However, the implementation of the final restoration plan as required in mitigation measure BIO- 1a would re-establish and improve habitat for listed and special-status plants and wildlife on the Project Site. Impacts to sensitive plant and wildlife species known or expected to occur on the Project Site would be mitigated through the replacement and enhancement of existing functions on the Project Site. Implementation of the proposed mitigation described for BIO.2 would further reduce impacts to individuals of sensitive species known or potentially present on the Project Site. The habitat enhancement and restoration efforts and the proposed mitigation measures discussed under impact BIO.1 would restore suitable portions of the Project Site with treatments and would increase overall functions within the Project area that would mitigate the remediation and County Development Plan impacts to sensitive species to less than significant. Therefore, although the Project would result in impacts to sensitive species, the overall long term impacts would be considered to have a significant but mitigable contribution to cumulative impacts Class II) to sensitive species. 4.2.7.3 Cumulative Impacts to Sensitive Habitats Several of the Cumulative Projects listed in Table 3-1 would result in the loss of hundreds of acres of habitat, some of which potentiality supports wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. It is assumed that those projects converting open space, native and non-native grasslands, and agricultural fields to residential and commercial purposes would result in permanent conversion of these sensitive habitats to commercial, residential, and recreational uses. The City and County Development Plan components of the Project would result in the permanent loss of sensitive habitats and would increase the cumulative impact to this resource. The implementation of the final restoration plan would re-establish and improve functions of the existing sensitive habitats, including wetlands, native grasslands, riparian habitat, and sensitive species habitat located within the Project boundary. The habitat enhancement and restoration efforts and the proposed mitigation measures discussed under impact BIO.1 would restore suitable portions of the Project Site with treatments and would increase overall functions within the Project area that would mitigate the remediation and City and County Development Plan impacts to sensitive habitats to less than significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measures and BIO -3a through 3c, and BIO-8a through 8d would reduce impacts to sensitive habitats to less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, although the Project would result in short and long term increases in cumulative impacts to sensitive habitats, the overall long term impacts would be considered to have a significant but mitigable contribution (Class II) to cumulative impacts to sensitive habitats. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-80 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2.7.4 Cumulative Impacts to Federal Wetlands Several of the Cumulative Projects listed in Table 3-1 would result in the loss of habitat, some of which potentiality support federal wetlands. The remediation and restoration component of the Project would result in impacts to 29.04 acres of Waters of the U.S. including federal wetland areas. The City and County Development Plan component of the Project would permanently impact 1.83 acres of Waters of the U.S. In addition, accidental spills and sediment and erosion from construction areas and operational activities (i.e., discharge from the proposed wastewater treatment plant under the County Development Plan) could flow into sensitive wetland habitats. Project related impacts would increase the cumulative impact to federal wetlands as defined in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Applicant-proposed mitigation includes wetland natural recovery and wetland restoration elsewhere on the Project Site in suitable areas that would restore wetlands at a 1.7:1 replacement ratio and would result in a net gain of functioning wetland habitat. The habitat enhancement and restoration efforts and the proposed mitigation measures discussed under impact BIO.1 would restore federal wetlands within the Project Site. Although the proposed Project would result in short term increases in cumulative impacts to federal wetland habitats, the overall long term impacts would be considered to have a significant but mitigable contribution to cumulative impacts (Class II) to federal wetlands. 4.2.7.5 Cumulative Impacts to Habitats that Would Affect Native Populations of Plants and Animals. Cumulative impacts to habitats supporting native populations of plants and animals would be similar to those described above in Section 4.2.7.1. Cumulative Projects would result in the loss of hundreds of acres of habitat supporting native populations of plants and animals. The Project would result in increased impacts to these habitats in the general area. The proposed City and County Development Plan elements of the Project would result in a permanent loss of habitat that precludes the re-establishment of native populations of plants and animals. However, the proposed restoration activities for the entire Project area are designed to improve the value and function of the existing on-site terrestrial ecosystems. The restored habitats throughout the Project Site would mitigate the loss and disturbance to habitats for native populations of plants and animals in the City and County Development Plan boundaries. Although the Project would result in short term increases in cumulative impacts to native plant and wildlife habitat, the overall long term impacts would be considered to have a significant but mitigable contribution (Class II) to cumulative impacts to this resource. 4.2.7.6 Cumulative Impacts to Wildlife Migration and Dispersal Several of the Cumulative Projects listed in Table 3-1 would result in the loss of hundreds of acres of habitat, some of which is used in various functions for migration and dispersal of wildlife species. Depending on the location and size of the cumulative projects, those projects converting open space, native and non-native grasslands, and agricultural fields to residential and commercial purposes would result in permanent conversion of migration corridors to 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-81 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR commercial, residential, and recreational uses. Those cumulative projects located closer to the Project (from Table 3-1 and shown in Figure 3-1: the proposed DeBlauw, Cowan Prado Road, Cowan Calle Malva, and the Medical Office Complex on Prado Road) are all located in undeveloped areas immediately to the north and west of the major permanent City and County Development Plan components of the Project. Wildlife movement in the general area would be constricted by the proposed City and County Development Plan projects located on the portion on the west and the proposed Project located on the eastern edge of the open area. Although the general improvements to the habitat, as proposed in the restoration plan, would generally improve the area in terms of wildlife migration, the City and County Development Plan components of the Project would result in the permanent impact and restriction of wildlife movement in the area and would increase the cumulative impact to this resource. The recommended mitigation measures would reduce impairment to movement, migration, and dispersal of migratory fish and wildlife species. Remediation activities shall be conducted outside of wintering season (MM BIO-1g) when disturbances to creeks and seasonal wetlands could have a potentially substantial effect on habitat linkages at a critical time of year for migrating aquatic wildlife. Mitigation that restricts public access into open space areas (MM BIO-8c) would reduce some of the effects of increased human presence in natural areas. With the intended improvement of functions through remediation and restoration and the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the Project’s contribution to the cumulative impacts to wildlife migration and dispersal would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.2.7.7 Cumulative Impacts to Plant and Animal Populations Cumulative impacts to habitats supporting native populations of plants and animals would be similar to those described above in Section 4.2.7.5. Although the Project would result in short term increases in cumulative impacts to native plant and wildlife, the overall long term impacts would be considered to have a significant but mitigable contribution to cumulative impacts to this resource (Class II). 4.2.8 Mitigation Monitoring Program 4.2.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party BIO-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a final restoration plan to the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building, City of San Luis Obispo, Department of Natural Resources, USFWS, USACE, and CDFW for review. The restoration plan shall be approved by San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building USFWS, and CDFW in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo, Department of Natural Review of restoration plan. Prior to grading permit issuance County Department of Planning and Building City Natural Resource Manager USFWS USACE 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-82 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party Resources. The final plan shall be revised as necessary to adequately mitigate actual disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species due to remediation. Conservation easement(s) shall be recorded on all property associated with the final restoration plan that is not designated for development. Draft conservation easement agreements, in a form approved by County Counsel and the City Attorney, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal of the final restoration plan. The final conservation easements shall be approved by the County and City in consultation with other resource agencies, and recorded, prior to final inspection of the restoration site(s) to protect biological resources in perpetuity. CDFW BIO-1b The Applicant shall conduct updated surveys of sensitive species habitats (including sensitive plant species, CRLF, wetland habitat, and VPFS habitat) within the Project Site within the appropriate season immediately prior to the onset of any ground disturbances associated with the Project in order to evaluate the current occupancy of suitable habitat for sensitive species and to refine the final habitat mitigation replacement acreages. Updated surveys for federally listed species shall be completed per the timing and methodology specified by resource agency protocol. Review of restoration plan. Prior to grading permit issuance County Department of Planning and Building City Natural Resource Manager USFWS USACE CDFW BIO-1c The final restoration plan shall provide for plant salvaging and replanting where appropriate (e.g., San Luis Obispo dudleya), restoration, and/or creation of habitat suitable for special status plant species including Cambria morning glory, Congdon’s tarplant, San Luis Obispo owl’s clover, Hoover’s button-celery, San Luis Obispo serpentine dudleya, and purple needlegrass. To offset impacts to VPFS habitat, the final restoration plan shall require a minimum of a 1:1 creation or restoration replacement of all VPFS habitat impacted by remediation or restoration efforts (or at least 14.78 acres of VPFS habitat depending on final disturbance acreages). The restoration shall be designed to restore or enhance enough habitat to ensure the final restoration replacement ratio. The final plan shall also include defined schedules of restoration efforts, success criteria, weed management methods including for those areas not being remediated or developed to ensure weed species do not encroach into restored areas, monitoring schedules, reporting requirements, and a Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan, (see mitigation measure BIO-5c). The objective of the Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be to assess if the restored habitats are functioning equal to or Review of restoration plan. Prior to grading permit issuance County Department of Planning and Building City Natural Resource Manager USFWS USACE CDFW 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-83 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party better than pre-Project conditions. The assessment of function shall be based on indicators such as wildlife use and presence of sensitive species within the habitats compared to pre-Project conditions. BIO-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the County to fund and provide access for a County-approved (in consultation with the City) independent biological monitor who shall regularly review and monitor remediation and restoration efforts to ensure that conditions of approval are being enforced and that success criteria are being met. The independent biological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt activities if permit requirements and conditions are not being met. Approve independent biological monitor. Biologist selected prior to grading permit issuance County Department of Planning and Building City Natural Resource Manager USFWS USACE CDFW BIO-1e If performance standards detailed in the Final Restoration Plan are not achieved in any restoration area, the Applicant shall submit and implement an alternative or adaptive mitigation strategy during the restoration and monitoring phase, for approval to the County or City, and appropriate resource agencies including the USFWS and CDFW. County Department of Planning and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-1f The monitoring results collected as part of the Long- Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be reported at least annually to the County, City, and appropriate resource agencies (i.e., USFWS and CDFW). The annual report shall document the effects of the proposed Project to the VPFS on the property and include acreage of occupied habitat that was impacted. The report shall contain a discussion of the problems encountered in implementing sensitive species habitat protection and other protective measures and recommendations for adaptive management to enhance the conservation of sensitive species habitat. County Department of Planning and Building and independent biological monitor to review annual Long-term Habitat and Management Plan annually. Throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-1g Remediation and restoration activities within 100 feet of potential or occupied VPFS habitat shall be scheduled to occur when the soil is dry to the touch both at the surface and one inch below the surface. After any precipitation event of greater than 0.2 inches, Project activities will only occur after the soil has dried sufficiently as described above, and no sooner than 48 hours after the rain event ends to reduce potential impacts to sensitive VPFS habitat outside of the construction and remediation boundaries. Project activities in upland areas can occur during the rainy season with appropriate habitat protection measures including exclusion fencing, biological monitoring, and sediment control measures to ensure that construction related materials do not enter County Department of Planning and independent biological monitor to review annual schedule and conduct regular monitoring. Throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-84 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party VPFS habitat. BIO-1h Only qualified, USFWS-approved, personnel with demonstrable field experience conducting VPFS cyst collection and reintroduction, consistent with the proposed Project activities, shall handle VPFS cysts, identify VPFS habitat, and conduct VPFS monitoring. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall assist with marking the limits of disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species. Work shall not be conducted in areas marked for avoidance. County Department of Planning and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building USFWS BIO-1i The VPFS-qualified biologist shall conduct sensitive vernal pool branchiopod surveys within the appropriate season immediately prior to the start of construction activities per the timing and methodology specified by USFWS protocol. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall monitor during construction activities in the vicinity of habitats to be avoided. The final acreage of habitat loss shall be revised as necessary to adequately mitigate actual disturbance to habitats for listed and special status species due to remediation. County Department of Planning and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Prior to construction phase and prior to each ground disturbance in VPFS habitat throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building USFWS BIO-1j The VPFS-qualified biologist shall conduct cyst collection efforts (cyst-bearing soil) and storage efforts from work areas prior to construction activities from the entire work area of each impacted pool when the ephemerally wetted areas are dry. The VPFS-qualified biologist shall follow USFWS standard procedures and guidance established in that agency’s permitting process The cysts shall be stored in labeled containers that are adequately ventilated. The cysts shall be kept out of direct sunlight to prevent excessive heating of the soil. The cysts shall be kept out of direct contact with water. When restored VPFS habitat is constructed, the inoculum shall be placed within the surface layer of the soil in a manner following USFWS protocols and guidance. County Department of Planning and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Prior to construction phase and prior to each ground disturbance in VPFS habitat throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-1k Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, the Project Applicant (via the USACE) shall consult with the USFWS and NMFS to obtain an Incidental Take Statement, pursuant to Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act to cover the Project's "take" which includes the permanent and temporary loss of VPFS habitat and the potential impact to south-central coast steelhead habitat). The Applicant shall comply with all measures issued by USFWS and NMFS for the Project. County Department of Planning to review issuance of applicable permits. Prior to grading permit issuance County Department of Planning and Building BIO-1l Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Project Applicant shall be required to obtain all County Department of Prior to grading County Department 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-85 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party applicable Federal and State permits and/or agreements, including, but not necessarily limited to: a Section 404 Permit from the USACE; and a Section 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW. Planning to review issuance of applicable permits. permit issuance of Planning and Building BIO-2a Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall fund and implement a biological resources training program for all construction workers and their contractors to minimize potential impacts to sensitive wildlife species Training shall occur prior to initial construction activities and again, annually and as needed for new workers. Prior to issuance of demolition permit, the training program shall be reviewed and approved by the County Department of Planning and Building in consultation with the Environmental Monitor (see EM-1) and City and shall include a description of important biological resources within the Project Site and all applicable conditions, permit requirements, and protection measures implemented to protect those resources. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve training program and schedule in conjunction with the City of San Luis Obispo Prior to construction phase and as necessary, at least annually) thereafter throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-2b Prior to construction activities, all grading limits and construction boundaries shall be delineated by construction fencing. Sensitive species habitat shall be delineated with specific sensitive species labeling (e.g. permanent signage every 100 feet along the fence stating No Entry Sensitive Habitat.”). The County shall approve the fencing prior to commencement of grading activities (including clearing and grubbing). County Department of Planning and Building and City Natural Resources Manager to review and approve fencing plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Fencing plan approved prior to permit issuance and regular monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-2c Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the County to fund a biological monitor, selected by the Applicant and approved by the County in consultation with the City and the USFWS to minimize potential impacts to sensitive species. The County-qualified biologist shall conduct sensitive species’ (including CRLF) surveys immediately prior (within the appropriate season) to construction activities and shall monitor during construction activities in the vicinity of habitats to be avoided. Any sensitive species observed during the pre-construction surveys shall be relocated out of harm’s way by a qualified and permitted biologist into the nearest suitable habitat as determined in consultation with the jurisdictional resource agency outside the disturbance area. Approve Project biologist. Project biologist approved prior to construction phase; monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building City Natural Resource Manager USFWS CDFW 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-86 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party Construction and sediment control fencing shall be inspected each work day during construction activities to ensure that sensitive species are not exposed to hazards. The Applicant shall be responsible for conducting inspections of the work area each work day to ensure that excavation areas, restored habitats, and other open water habitat in the area do not have oil sheen, liquid oil, or any other potential exposure risk to wildlife. If any exposure risk is identified, the Applicant shall implement measures that could include, but are not limited to hazing, fencing, and wildlife removals to eliminate the exposure risk. The Applicant shall prepare and submit for approval, as part of the Final Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan, an Oiled Wildlife Contingency Plan to the County and CDFW. BIO-2d To minimize potential impacts to nesting native bird species, and in compliance with the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, or 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, all activities resulting in ground disturbances during all phases of remediation, restoration, pipe removal, and construction activities involving vegetation removal/trimming shall be done, as feasible, outside the breeding season (February 15 through August 31). If vegetation must be removed during this period, then the Applicant shall retain a biologist acceptable to the County in consultation with the City to conduct surveys for nesting birds. Surveys shall be conducted within 3 days prior to vegetation removal or other construction-related disturbances. If nesting birds are observed within the vicinity, then a minimum 100-foot buffer from the nest would be established. The buffer would be delineated by orange construction fencing or other delineator approved by the County in consultation with the City and signage and would remain in place until the nest is abandoned or the young have fledged. The qualified biologist shall be present when any buffer fencing is established. The qualified biologist shall monitor the nest to ensure that Project activities do not violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or the California Fish and Game Code. At minimum, the biologist would check for new active nests, and determine the status of ongoing active nests, weekly during the specified nesting season. The biologist would ensure that all fencing and signage was properly maintained, and would provide weekly, or less frequent if requested by the agencies, e-mail updates on the status of all monitored nests to the County, City, CDFW, and USFWS. If the biologist determines that nesting is being disrupted, the construction activities shall cease and wait until a new buffer area is determined, the young have fledged, or the nest is determined to have failed. County Department of Planning and City Natural Resources Manager to approve Project biologist. Project biologist approved prior to construction surveys conducted and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases Applicant and County Department of Planning and Building 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-87 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party BIO-2e Hawks and owls nest earlier than most other native birds. If initial construction activities, ground disturbance, or vegetation clearing involving vegetation removal/trimming occurs from December 1 through August 31, the nest monitor would conduct a pre- construction survey within 3 days prior to vegetation removal or other construction-related disturbances focused on actively nesting hawks or owls. If any actively nesting hawks or owls are found, a 500-foot buffer would be established around the nest tree to help ensure that nesting is not disrupted. The buffer would be delineated by orange construction fencing and signage and would remain in place until the nest is either abandoned or the young have fledged. The nest monitor would be present when any buffer fencing is established. County Department of Planning and City Natural Resources Manager to approve Project biologist. Project biologist approved prior to construction surveys conducted and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases Applicant and County Department of Planning and Building BIO-3a The final restoration plan shall require a 2:1 replacement of all native grassland (as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and CDFW)impacted by remediation efforts of the project (at least 6.73 impacted acres as described in Padre 2008c). Implementation of the native grassland restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. County Department of Planning and Building and City Natural Resources Manager to review and approve restoration plan. Prior to grading permit issuance County Department of Planning and Building BIO-3b The final restoration plan shall require a 1:1 replacement of all Waters/wetlands of the U.S. and one-parameter wetlands (42.93 acres) temporarily impacted by remediation and restoration efforts Implementation of the wetland and habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-3c Prior to issuance of grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate that all staging areas, equipment storage areas, stockpile sites, and refueling areas are located at least 100 feet from surface water bodies and wetland habitats to minimize the potential for releases into surface water or wetland habitat. County Department of Planning and Building independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-3d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the County Monitoring County 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-88 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party Applicant shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for approval to the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building. The final plan shall be revised as necessary to include any updated contours of the final grading as determined in the final restoration plan. The SWPPP shall adequately mitigate any potential impacts resulting from storm water flow into sensitive habitats. The SWPPP shall ensure that all remediation and restoration activities, especially those activities occurring within the riparian and stream corridors that could result in turbidity or release of contaminated material into sensitive habitats employ measures such as sediment fences or other containment devices and construction best management practices to minimize the potential for impacts to sensitive habitats Department of Planning and Building independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. conducted throughout construction and restoration phases Department of Planning and Building BIO-4a The final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) shall be implemented to improve the value and function of existing wetlands on site that would result in a 2:1 ratio of restored wetlands to wetlands lost due to Project disturbances. Implementation of wetland restoration shall follow the plan, including locations of existing wetlands to be restored, restoration techniques, schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. The final plan shall also include a Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan (MM BIO-1c) that will include performance standards to assess whether the restored wetland habitats are functioning similar to pre-Project conditions. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-4b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain a Section 404 permit prior to disturbance of wetland areas. Consultation with the USFWS and NMFS shall be completed during the Section 404 permitting process. The Applicant shall comply with all measures issued by USFWS and NMFS for the Project. These measures could include, but are not limited to habitat restoration, habitat enhancement, biological resources training, biological monitoring, sensitive species relocation effort, restoration monitoring and reporting, and agency approval of restoration efforts. County Department of Planning to review issuance of applicable permits. Prior to grading permit issuance County Department of Planning and Building BIO-5a The terrestrial ecosystem portion of the final restoration plan shall include success criteria for re-establishing populations of native plants and wildlife. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction County Department of Planning and Building 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-89 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party monitor to conduct regular monitoring. and restoration phases BIO-5b The final restoration plan shall be implemented to restore at least 4.0 acres of phreatophytic woodland, 27.0 acres of mixed hardwood/forb field, 10.9 acres of coastal scrub chaparral, and 45.2 acres of forb field (Padre and WSP 2009). Implementation of the terrestrial habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-5c The function of the restored terrestrial habitats shall be monitored. A Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be developed and appended to the final restoration plan. The habitat management and evaluation plan shall include methods to determine if the restored areas are meeting success criteria per the approved restoration plan. The complementary plan shall include surveys to monitor the occurrence of native plants and animals in restored habitats relative to their occurrence in similar onsite habitats prior to, or unaffected by, remediation and development. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-6a The terrestrial ecosystem portion of the final restoration plan shall be reviewed and approved by the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo Natural Resources Manager. The plan shall include provisions to maintain and re-establish habitat linkages. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-6b The final restoration plan shall include consideration of on-site natural habitats and linkages to off-site, adjacent habitats, especially the South Hills Conservation Area. County Department of Planning and Building to review and Plan approved prior to grading permit County Department of Planning and Building 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-90 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases BIO-7a A qualified biologist shall conduct surveys throughout areas proposed to be disturbed to determine the presence of wildlife species prior to ground disturbance. The biologist shall be on-site during initial site disturbances i.e., brush removal, top soil disturbances, etc). Wildlife species encountered during the initial disturbances shall be relocated to suitable habitat out of potential danger. All handling and relocation of sensitive and non-sensitive wildlife species shall be conducted by biologists with appropriate authorizations and permits (CDFW and USFWS). Remediation activities, including restoration efforts shall be regularly monitored throughout the remediation and restoration phases to ensure that wildlife species have not entered work areas. The biological monitor shall conduct regular site inspections of the remediation and restoration activities to ensure that all applicable mitigation measures are being enacted. The biological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt activities if permit requirements and conditions are not being met. The biological monitor shall prepare an annual summary report describing site visit observations and shall provide this report to the City, County and regulatory agencies (including CDFW, USACE, and USFWS) for review. County Department of Planning and Building independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-7b To minimize the potential for road mortality of wildlife, all nighttime traffic shall be minimized during the remediation and restoration phases and permitted only for activities required for safety reasons, emergencies, or equipment staging and vehicle maintenance necessary to comply with traffic and air quality mitigation measures; all hauling activities shall be restricted to daylight hours, defined as the hours after sunrise and before sunset. County Department of Planning and Building independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-7c The Stockpiling Plan required by Mitigation Measure WR-3c shall also include methods to keep wildlife from coming into contact with stockpiled contaminated soils. Review of Plan Site Inspections During remediation and Construction phases. County Department of Planning and Building 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-91 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.2.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party BIO-8a The final restoration plan shall include criteria that would require the restoration of at least a 2:1 replacement ratio 4.14 acres as defined by Padre 2008c) of all “native grasslands” habitat permanently lost in the development elements of the project. Restored native grassland habitat shall meet standards and criteria as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo and CDFW within the proposed restoration of 45.2 acres of forb field habitat. Implementation of the terrestrial habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and development phases San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building BIO-8b The function of the restored native grassland habitats shall be monitored. A Long-Term Habitat Management and Evaluation Plan shall be developed and appended to the final restoration plan. The habitat management and evaluation plan shall include methods to determine if the restored areas are meeting success criteria per the approved restoration plan including criteria of plant and wildlife species in restored habitats and to compare such results to pre-Project conditions. The complementary plan shall include surveys to monitor the occurrence of native plants and animals in restored habitats relative to their occurrence in similar habitats prior to remediation and development. San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and development phases San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building BIO-8c Hikers, pets, and bikers shall be excluded from sensitive habitats within the Project Site. The final SLO City and County-approved restoration plan shall include a fencing plan element with specific details on location, requirements of permanent and seasonal exclusion zones, and type of fencing to ensure that wildlife movement is not restricted. The fencing plan shall include information on placement of signs, educational placards, type of fencing required, method of exclusions, and monitoring and repair of exclusion devices, and shall include, at the least, a description and figure of those areas (i.e., VPFS habitat, vernal pool habitat, riparian habitat, and habitat in the process of being restored) that would require full time exclusion. San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and development phases San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building BIO-8d The final restoration plan shall require a 2:1 replacement San Luis Plan San Luis 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-92 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party of the 3.71 acres of USACE Jurisdictional Waters/wetlands, isolated waters/wetlands, and one- parameter wetlands (for a replacement of 7.42 acres) permanently impacted by the City Development Plan. Implementation of the wetland and habitat restoration shall follow the plan, including locations to be restored, restoration techniques, a schedule of surveys to monitor the rate of recovery, success criteria, and remedial actions if success criteria are not met. Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and development phases Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building BIO-9a To reduce impacts to wildlife migration, the Applicant shall include in the approved final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) landscape designs for planting of native vegetation along the northern portion of the City Development Plan area. The native vegetation landscaping shall be designed to provide wildlife species cover and refuge during migration. The landscaping shall be designed to shield migrating wildlife from human presence, noise, and lighting from residential and recreational activities in the City and County Development Plan footprint. Due to the 2-25 year duration of development phase, such planting shall occur on the onset of the development phase. City and County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout development phase City and County Department of Planning and Building BIO-9b To reduce cumulative impacts to wildlife migration the Applicant shall include in the final restoration plan (MM BIO-1a) a fencing plan element with specific details on location and requirements for the purpose of restricting wildlife movement through the development area but allowing movement through the open space areas. City and County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout development phase County Department of Planning and Building BIO-10 Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan to the City for approval. All Project lighting shall be designed to shielded spillage of light into adjacent preserved open space areas. Any structural part of the light fixture providing this shielding shall be permanently affixed. San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and San Luis Obispo City and County Department of Planning and Building 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-93 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party Outdoor lighting for buildings shall be restricted to lights required by code for lighting building exteriors and for safety and security needs. The lighting for the ball field shall not be on during period when there are no activities at the fields. In no case shall the lights at the ball fields be on between the hours of midnight and 7:00 AM. After initial installation of Project lighting, a City-approved biologist shall conduct a field inspection to confirm that the proper lamps have been installed and that light spillage into Open Space areas has been minimized to the maximum extent feasible without compromising safety or other critical night-lighting requirements. to review and approve plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. monitoring conducted throughout development phase 4.2.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan All mitigation measures identified for the City Development Plan would apply to the County Development Plan. See the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the City Development Plan above for a list of these measures. Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party BIO-11a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the applicant shall prepare a spill/discharge plan with specific measures that would prevent untreated discharge or accidental releases, such as saline or chlorinated water and/or untreated water during storm events into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek to reduce exposure risks to aquatic species located downstream of proposed discharge. The discharge plan shall be approved by the County and shall include specific measures such as the use of stormwater basins, a complete water sampling schedule, and methods for stormwater handling. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve spill/dischar ge plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building BIO-11b Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate to the County that all open basins, including “polishing wetlands” or settling basins, that would require regular maintenance and/or vegetation management, containing any Project-related fluids shall be designed to exclude all wildlife, including birds, bats, and amphibians. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve spill discharge plan and independent biological monitor to conduct Plan approved prior to grading permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-94 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party regular monitoring. 4.2.9 References Avocet Environmental Inc. 2007. Feasibility Study for the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Consultant’s report prepared for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, CA. Avocet Environmental, Inc., 2008. San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Hydrology Study. Powerpoint presentation, San Luis Obispo, CA. September 5, 2008 Avocet Environmental, Inc. (Avocet). 2009. Hydrology Study for the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Consultant’s report prepared for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, CA. January 26, 2009. Project No. 1212.005. Avocet Environmental, Inc. (Avocet). 2011. Technical Memorandum Environmental Issues Concerning Future Water Supply Wells Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. December 2, 2011. Project No. 1234.004. Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (BBL). 2004. Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California (version 2). Prepared for San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team; Ratified May 25, 2004 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CNDDB) 2010. Natural Diversity Data Base of recorded occurrences of special-status species. Accessed May 2010. California Department of Fish and Game. Fish and Game Code. 2011. California Edition. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2008. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v7-08c). California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. Accessed on Thu, Aug. 14, 2008 from http://www.cnps.org/inventory. Chevron Environmental Management Company. 2007. Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Project, San Luis Obispo, CA. December 20, 2007. Cleath-Harris Geologists. 2013. SB 610 Water Supply Assessment for Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Project. January 3, 2013. Cowardin, L. M., V. Garter, F. Golet and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-79/31. De Weese, J. 1998. Vernal Pool Construction Monitoring Methods and Habitat Replacement Evaluation. Pp. 217-233, In, C. W. Witham, E. T. Bauder, D. Belk, W. R. Ferren Jr. and R. Ornduff, editors. Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems. Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-95 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR EDAW, Inc., July 23, 1999, Wetland Delineation for Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. Project No. 8T148.01. Delineation certified by United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service in a letter dated September 10, 1999, entitled Verification of Jurisdictional Delineation of Wetlands at Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. Eddleman, W. R., R. E. Flores, and M. L. Legare. 1994. Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis). In The Birds of North America, No. 123 (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American Ornithologists’ Union. Edell, T. 1996. The Birds of San Luis Obispo County, California. Morro Coast Audubon Society checklist. England Geosystem, Inc. (EGI). 2002. Hydrology Data Report (June 1999-September 2000) San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, Project No. 147.009, May 24, 2002. EXTRIX. 1998. Scoping Ecological Risk Assessment and Biological Site Characterization for Unocal Tank Farm Road Site. Consultant’s report prepared for Unocal Corporation, San Luis. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Environmental Laboratory. 2008. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region. Version 2.0. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program, Washington, D.C., September 2008. Federal Register. 1986. Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule. Volume 51, No. 219; 33 CFR Parts 320 through 330. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in Hydric Soils of the United States. Washington, D.C. Hydric soil definition). Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric Soils of the United States. Washington, D.C. Hydric Soil Criteria). Federal Register. April 2008. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 33 CFR Parts 325 and 332 and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 230. Compensatory Mitigation for Loss of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule. Federal Register, Vol. 73, No. 70; Thursday April 10, 2008. Ferren, W. R., Jr., P. L. Fiedler, and R. A. Leidy, 1996. Wetlands of California, Parts I (History of Wetland Habitat Classification), II (Classification and Description of Wetlands of the Central and Southern California Coast and Coastal Watersheds), and III (Key to and Catalogue of Wetlands of the Central and Southern California Coast and Coastal Watersheds). Madroño 43 (1) Supplement: 105-233. Ferren, W. R. Jr. and D. M. Hubbard. 1998. Review of Ten Years of Vernal Pool Restoration and Creation in Santa Barbara, California. Pp. 206-216, In, C. W. Witham, E. T. Bauder, D. Belk, W. R. Ferren Jr. and R. Ornduff, editors. Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems. Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-96 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002. Volume 23. Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Cyperaceae. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Grewell, B. J. J. C. Callaway, and W. R. Ferren, Jr. 2007. Estuarine wetlands. Pp. 124-154, In, M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. 3rd edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Hickman, J., editor. 1993. The Jepson Manual. Higher Plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. California Department of Fish & Game, Sacramento, CA. Unpublished mimeo. Hoover, R.R. 1970. The Vascular Plants of San Luis Obispo, California. University of California Press, Berkeley. Jennings, M. and M. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California. Final Report Submitted to the California Department of Fish and Game Inland Fisheries Division. November 1, 1994. Keeley, J. E. and F. W. Davis. 2007. Chaparral. Pp. 339-366, In, M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. 3rd edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. L. C. Lee & Associates 1997. A Guidebook for Assessment of the Functions of waters of the United States, Including Wetlands on the Borden Ranch, Sacramento and San Joaquin Counties, California. Prepared for US EPA, Region IX. Lehman, P.E. 1994. The Birds of Santa Barbara County, California. Vertebrate Museum, University of California Santa Barbara. Matthews, M. A. 1997. An Illustrated Field Key to the Flowering Plants of Monterey County and Ferns, Fern Allies, and Conifers. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Minnich, R. A. 2007. Southern California conifer forests. Pp. 502-538, In, M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. 3rd edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Minnich, R. A. 2008. California’s Fading Wildflowers. Lost Legacy and Biological Invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley. National Wetland Science Training Cooperative (NWSTC). 2001. Draft Guidebook for Reference-Based Assessment of the Functions of Riverine Waters and wetlands Ecosystems in the South Coast Region of Santa Barbara County, California. L. C. Lee & Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA. National Wetland Science Training Cooperative. (NWSTC). 2004. Guidebook to Hydrogeomorphic Functional Assessment of Riverine Waters and wetlands in the Santa Margarita Watershed. Peer Review Draft (1977). Operational Draft, (2004). In cooperation with U.S. EPA, Region IX, California Coastal Conservancy, California Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Diego). 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-97 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2006. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 6.0. G.W. Hurt, L.M. Vasilas, editors. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX. F. Otte, City of San Luis Obispo Biologist, personal communication, September 25, 2007. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) and WSP Environment & Energy (WSP). 2008a. An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Consultant’s report developed for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, California. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) and WSP Environment & Energy (WSP). 2008b. Operational Draft Guidebook to Assessment of Riverine Waters and wetlands Functions at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Consultant’s report developed for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, California. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) and WSP Environment & Energy (WSP). 2008c. Description and Analysis of the Botanical Resources, Including Vascular Plant Species of Conservation Concern, at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Consultant’s report developed for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, California. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2008d. Protocol-Level California Red-legged Frog Survey Report for the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site (Tank Farm), San Luis Obispo County, California. Consultant’s report developed for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, California. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2008e. Burrowing Owl Survey Report for the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site (Tank Farm), San Luis Obispo County, California. Consultant’s report developed for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, California. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) and WSP Environment & Energy (WSP). 2009. 75% Basis of Design Report: Landscape Restoration for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. January 2009. Padre Associates, Inc. 2012a. 90-Day Report on Wet Season Vernal Pool Branchiopod Surveys for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California. July 18, 2012. Padre Associates, Inc. 2012b. California Red-Legged Frog Survey for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. California. August 27, 2012. Padre Associates, Inc. 2013a. Biological Resource Survey Letter-Report for the Off-Site Flower Mound Impact Area, Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. Padre Associates, Inc. 2013b. Wetland Disturbance Calculations Memo for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. Padre Associates, Inc. 2013c. One-Parameter Wetland Clarification Memo for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. 4.2 Biological Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.2-98 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Pavlik, B. M., P. C. Muick, S. Johnson, and M. Popper. 1991. Oaks of California. Cachuma Press, Los Olivos, CA. Pickart, A. J. and M. G. Barbour. 2007. Beach and dune. Pp. 155-179, In, M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. 3rd edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Randal, J.M., M. Remánjek, and J. C. Hunter. 1998. Characteristics of the exotic flora of California. Fremontia 26(4): 3-12. Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2003-2004. Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Phase I, II, III Biological Resources Studies. Consultant’s report prepared for Union Oil Company of California. San Luis Obispo, CA. Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2005. Unocal Corporation San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Comprehensive Fairy Shrimp Wet and Dry Season Survey Report. October 18, 2005. Rundel, P. W. 2007. Sage scrub. Pp. 1208-228, In, M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf, and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. 3rd edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. San Luis Obispo, City and County. 2003. San Luis Obispo Waterway Management Plan. Shuford, W.D. and T.G. Gardali, eds. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern. Studies of Western Birds No. 1. Western Field Ornithologists and California Department of Fish and Game. Solomeschch, A. I., M. G. Barbour, and R. F. Holland. 2007. Vernal pools. Pp. 394-424, In, M. G. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf, and A. A. Schoenherr, editors. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. 3rd edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Smith, C. F. 1998. A Flora of the Santa Barbara Region, California. 2nd edition. Santa BarbaraGarden & Capra Press, Santa Barbara, CA. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department ofAgriculture (NRCS). 2004. Web Soil Survey – San Luis Obispo County, Coastal Part, Soil Maps Version 1, July 29, 2004. Available online at http://websoilsurvey. nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 6/5/2008. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department ofAgriculture (NRCS). 2008. Web Soil Survey – San Luis Obispo County, Coastal Part, Soil Data Version 4, Jan 2, 2008. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.Accessed 6/5/2008. Sutter, G. and R. Francisco. 1998. Vernal pool creation in the Sacramento Valley: A review of the issues surrounding its role as a conservation tool. Pp. 190-194, In, C. W. Witham, E. T. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (USDA SCS). 1979. SoilSurvey of San Luis Obispo County. 4.2 Biological Resources December 2013 4.2-99 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Western Region Climate Center (WRCC). 2007. San Luis Obispo Polytech climate data (1971 – 2000). Internet: www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?caslop+sca Accessed November2007. Williams, D.F. 1986. Mammalian Species of Special Concern in California. State of California, the Resource Agency, Department of Fish and Game. Wildlife Management Division Administrative Report 86-1. June 1986. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.3 Transportation and Circulation This section is based on a transportation impact study prepared by Overland Traffic Consultants and Central Coast Transportation Consulting. Refer to Appendix D for the full transportation impact study. 4.3.1 Environmental Setting 4.3.1.1 Existing Roadway Network The Project is within the County of San Luis Obispo (County), with the potential to be annexed to the City of San Luis Obispo (City). Affected roadways in the region are within both the City and County and also include state highways. In addition, off-site materials hauling associated with remediation activities would affect Highway 41 in Kings County and Highway 33 and Lokern Road in Kern County. Figure 4.3-1 shows the roadways and intersections in the vicinity of the Project. The following are the existing local and regional freeways, highways, and roadways likely to be influenced by the Project traffic. U.S. Highway 101 operates in the north-south direction and is located west of the Project Site. This highway provides two lanes in each direction in the Project vicinity. Freeway ramps are located at South Higuera Street, Los Osos Valley Road, Prado Road, and Madonna Road. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) reports that U.S. Highway 101 carried approximately 56,000 vehicles per day (VPD) and 5,600 vehicles per hour (VPH) during the peak hours between Madonna Road and Los Osos Valley Road in 2008. U.S. Highway 101 spans from Los Angeles through California, Oregon and Washington to the north with parts of the highway along the coastline. Broad Street operates in the north-south direction and is located east of the Project Site. Broad Street provides two lanes in each direction in the Project vicinity. Turn lanes are provided at most major intersections. Caltrans reports that Broad Street (previously designated as State Route 227) carried approximately 22,800 VPD and 2,700 VPH during the peak hours at Tank Farm Road during 2008. Broad Street is designated as a truck route. It is designated as a road of high or moderate scenic value. South Street is also designated as a truck route, and a road of moderate scenic value. State Route 227 continues south through Price Canyon to connect with U.S. Highway 101 in Arroyo Grande. Aero Drive is designated as a local commercial street by the City. Local commercial streets are described as roadways which directly serve non-residential developments and carry traffic to commercial collector streets. Aero Drive operates in generally the east-west direction and provides access to San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport. Currently one lane in each direction is provided. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-1 Study Area Intersections Source: MRS 2012 Buckley Road is designated as an Arterial Street by the City (Collector by the County). Arterial Streets are described as roadways which provide circulation between activity centers and residential streets with two to four travel lanes. Buckley Road operates predominately in the east- west direction and currently has one lane in each direction. It is designated as a road of high or moderate scenic value. Elks Lane is designated as a Local Commercial Street by the City. Local Commercial Streets are described by the City as streets which directly service non-residential development and channel traffic to commercial collector streets. Elks Lane provides one lane in each direction in the Project vicinity. South Higuera Street is a generally north-south roadway designated as an Arterial Street by the City and County. South Higuera Street is part of the City's truck route system and provides connection between downtown San Luis Obispo (where it is named Higuera Street) and U.S. Highway 101. It is designated as a road of high scenic value between Prado Road and Los Osos Valley Road, a road of moderate scenic value north of Prado Road, and a road of high or moderate scenic value south of Los Osos Valley Road. Industrial Way is designated as a Commercial Collector Street. Commercial Collector Streets collect traffic from commercial areas and distribute them to the commercial arterials. Industrial Way operates in the east-west direction with one lane in each direction with on-street parking. Industrial Way spans from Broad Street to the railroad tracks in the Project vicinity. Los Osos Valley Road is an east-west roadway designated as an Arterial Street from South Higuera Street to the southbound U.S. 101 Freeway ramps and again from west of Madonna 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Road. Between this span the roadway is designated as a Parkway Arterial. Portions of the roadway are designated as a high or moderate scenic route outside of the City limits and portions are designated as a high scenic route. Los Osos Valley Road provides one to two lanes in each direction in the Project vicinity. The roadway extends from South Higuera Street to the coast in Los Osos. Madonna Road operates in the northeast-southwest direction and is designated as an Arterial Street by the City. It is part of the truck route system and designated as high or moderate scenic route outside of the City limits. Madonna Road provides two to three lanes in each direction and spans for the U.S. 101 Freeway to Los Osos Valley Road. Orcutt Road is designated as an Arterial Street by the City and County. Orcutt Road provides a single lane in each direction but widens between Broad Street and Laurel Lane to provide two lanes. Orcutt Road operates from Broad Street to Johnson Avenue in the Project vicinity. It is designated as a road of moderate scenic value within the City limits and a road of high or moderate scenic value outside of the City limits. Prado Road is a planned Regional Route which will span between Madonna Road and Broad Street. One lane in each direction is currently provided between the east side of U.S. Highway 101 and the 400 block of Prado Road where the roadway terminates. Prado Road is designated as an existing and future truck route. Prado Road is also designated as a road of moderate scenic value between U.S. Highway 101 and South Higuera Street. Santa Fe Road is designated as a Commercial Collector Street from Buckley Road to Prado Road. Currently Santa Fe road provides one lane in each direction between Buckley Road and Tank Farm Road where the roadway currently terminates. Tank Farm Road is designated as a Parkway Arterial, part of the City's truck route system and provides high or moderate scenic value outside of the City limit. Currently one lane in each direction is provided. However the roadway expands at South Higuera Street and Broad Street to provide turn lanes and two lanes of travel are provided in each direction between Broad Street and the railroad tracks. Other Highways State Routes 166, 33, 41, and 46 could also be used as part of the alternative routes related to contaminated soils hauling. Hydrocarbon-affected soils would be disposed of at the City of Santa Maria Landfill, reached via U.S. Highway 101, Betteravia Road, and Philbric Road. 4.3.1.2 Existing Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities Bicycle facilities are provided throughout the City and County (see Figure 2-18). Bicycle paths, which are right-of-way reserved for bicycles and pedestrians that are completely separate from the streets (i.e., Class I Bike Paths), are provided through Meadow Park providing a connection between Bridge and Meadow Streets. Bicycle lanes, which are striped lanes for one-way bicycle travel (i.e., Class II Bike Paths), are provided along a majority of Broad Street, Los Osos Valley Road, Madonna Road, Tank Farm Road, Orcutt Road, and South Higuera Street. Bicycle routes, 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR which are lightly traveled streets where bicycles share the road with vehicles without delineating lines, are provided at various locations throughout the community (i.e., Class III Bike Paths). Portions of Tank Farm Road are designated future Bicycle Paths by the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan (City of San Luis Obispo, 2007). Buckley Road and Prado Road are also designated for future bike lanes. 4.3.1.3 Existing Transit Services Local transit services are provided in the area by, San Luis Obispo Transit (SLO Transit) and Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and would alleviate automobile traffic impacts (as opposed to the Airport, for example, which is a regional transit service). AMTRAK provides two services in the area including the Coast Starlight and Pacific Surfliner routes. The train station is located at 1011 Railroad Avenue north east of Broad Street and Santa Barbara Avenue which is north of the Project Site. The Coast Starlight travels between Seattle and Los Angeles daily. The Pacific Surfliner travels between San Diego and San Luis Obispo with three daily trips in each direction. SLO Transit provides services throughout the City including the Project area along South Street, Madonna Road, South Higuera Street, Broad Street, Orcutt Road, portions of Tank Farm Road east of Broad Street), Prado Road, and Santa Barbara Avenue. Routes 1, 2, 3, 4-A, 5-A and 5-B, and 6A-B service the greater San Luis Obispo area with headways as short as 30 minutes during the university calendar. On weekends and during the summer months, the service is significantly scaled back with some routes discontinued, headways lengthened and evening service reduced. RTA provides intercity services in the Project area with Route 10 along South Higuera Street, as well as ADA paratransit services throughout the County. Currently there is no fixed-route bus service along the Project frontage of Tank Farm Road. The closest transit stop to the Project Site is located on Broad Street near the Marigold Center serviced by SLO Transit, approximately 2,000 feet away from the eastern edge of the Project Site. To the west, the SLO Transit services the shopping center on South Higuera Street south of Tank Farm Road, approximately 3,000 feet from the western edge of the Project Site. 4.3.1.4 Intersections Existing traffic conditions at the following 17 study intersections were evaluated to determine baseline conditions in the study area (refer to Figure 4.3-1): 1. Broad Street and South Street/Santa Barbara Street; 2. Madonna Road and Northbound U.S.-101 On/Off Ramps; 3. Madonna Road and Southbound U.S.-101 On/Off Ramps; 4. Northbound U.S. 101 Off Ramp/Elks Lane and NB U.S.-101On Ramp/Prado Road; 5. Prado Road and South Higuera Street; 6. Los Osos Valley Road and Northbound U.S.-101 On/Off Ramps; 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 7. Los Osos Valley Road and Southbound U.S.-101 On/Off Ramps; 8. Los Osos Valley Road and South Higuera Road; 9. South Higuera Road and Tank Farm Road; 10. South Higuera Road and Vachell Lane; 11. Broad Street and Orcutt Road; 12. Broad Street and Industrial Way; 13. Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road; 14. Broad Street and Tank Farm Road; 15. Broad Street and Aero Drive; 16. Buckley Road and Santa Fe Road; and 17. Broad Street and Buckley Road/Hidden Springs. The existing traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown on Figures 4.3-2 and 4.3-3. Traffic counts were conducted by an independent count company during October 2009 on three typical weekdays when schools were in session and on one Saturday at a single intersection. These existing counts were incorporated and compared to City model counts. The analysis is based on a combination of the traffic counts conducted in 2009 and City model information for existing conditions. 4.3.1.5 Intersection, Corridor, and Freeway Evaluation Methodology Due to the possibility that the Project would be processed in either jurisdiction, traffic conditions have been evaluated based upon City and County standards. The operations of intersections are described using a lettering system called level of service (LOS). The LOS ranges from LOS A, which is the best operating conditions, to LOS F, signifying failure. The intersections which are signalized are analyzed based upon average control delay per vehicle which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time. Average control delay includes deceleration, queue movement, stopped time, and start up acceleration time. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2000 provides an industry-standard method for calculating average control delay. The Synchro 8 software package implements the HCM methods to calculate the LOS at intersections during the peak hours of travel. The intersections which are not signalized are analyzed based upon average control vehicular delay. Control delay is the increased time of travel for a vehicle approaching and going through a stopped intersection. This is also calculated using the Synchro 8 software based upon the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2000. LOS descriptions and average control delay are summarized in Table 4.3-1. The LOS definition for corridors is based on the average travel speed along the corridor as calculated by the Synchro 8 software package. The LOS thresholds for corridors are presented in Table 4.3-2. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-2 Existing a.m. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Source: Overland 2012 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-3 Existing p.m. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Source: Overland 2012 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.3-1 Intersection Levels of Service & Delay Level of Service Signalized Intersection Delay (seconds per vehicle) Unsignalized Intersection Delay seconds per vehicle) Description of Operating Conditions A Less than 10 Less than 10 Excellent conditions. No loaded cycles and little to no delay. B > 10 to 20 > 10 to 15 Very good conditions. A stable flow of traffic. C > 20 to 35 > 15 to 25 Good conditions. Stable operations continue. Loading is intermittent. Occasionally drivers may have to wait and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D > 35 to 55 > 25 to 35 Fair conditions. Approaching instability. Delays may be lengthy during short times within the peak hours. E > 55 to 80 > 35 to 50 Poor conditions. At or near capacity with possible long queues for left turning vehicles. Full utilization of every signal cycle is seldom attained. F > 80 > 50 Failure conditions. Gridlock with stoppages of long duration. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Table 4.3-2 Corridor Level of Service Thresholds Level of Service Urban Street Class* I II III IV Average Travel Speed (miles per hour) A >42 >35 >30 >25 B 35 – 42 29 – 35 25 – 30 21 – 25 C 28 – 34 23 – 28 19 – 24 15 – 20 D 22 – 27 18 – 22 15 – 18 12 – 14 E 16 – 21 13 – 17 11 – 14 9 – 11 F < 16 < 13 < 11 < 9 As defined in Exhibit 15-2 of the Highway Capacity Manual. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 The LOS definition for freeway segments differs from the delay methodology used for intersections and corridors. Operating conditions along the freeway are based on the density of the traffic and is expressed in vehicles per mile per lane (veh/mi/lane). This methodology has been adopted by Caltrans District 5 to evaluate mainline freeway operating conditions and is based on the Highway Capacity Manual. The HCS+ software by McTrans was used to evaluate freeway operating conditions. Table 4.3-3 shows the definitions of the LOS grades for freeway locations. 4.3.1.6 Existing Intersection, Corridor and Freeway Operations LOS The traffic volumes collected, lane configurations, and traffic control were used to determine the existing conditions at the study intersections. The results of this analysis are provided in Table 4.3-4. The existing conditions of the Tank Farm Road corridor are provided in Table 4.3-5. The existing conditions of the freeway segments are provided in Table 4.3-6. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.3-3 Freeway Segment Level of Service Thresholds Level of Service Description Density1 A Free flow speeds prevail. 11 B Free flow speeds continue. Maneuverability is only slightly restricted. > 11 to 18 C Speeds at or near free flow speeds. Maneuverability within the traffic stream is noticeably restricted, lane changes require more care. > 18 to 26 D Speeds decline slightly with increasing flows. Maneuverability within the traffic stream is more limited with reduced driver comfort. > 26 to 35 E Operation at capacity. No usable gaps with little room to maneuver. Disruptions create queuing. > 35 to 45 F Breakdown in traffic flow. Failure. > 45 1 Density in vehicles per mile per lane. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Table 4.3-4 Existing Conditions, Level of Service Summary Intersection Peak Hour Average Delay per Vehicle (sec) Level of Service 1. Broad Street & South St/Santa Barbara Ave a.m. 23.8 C p.m. 28.8 C 2. Madonna Road & NB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 19.4 B p.m. 25.2 C 3. Madonna Road & SB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 29.5 C p.m. 36.4 D 4. NB U.S. 101 Off Ramp/Elks Ln. & NB U.S. 101 On Ramp/Prado Rd* a.m. 9.3 A p.m. 19.7 C 5. Prado Road & S. Higuera Street a.m. 18.6 B p.m. 23.7 C 6. Los Osos Valley Road & SB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 22.0 C p.m. 22.2 C 7. S. Higuera Street & Tank Farm Road a.m. 23.2 C p.m. 28.3 C 8. S. Higuera Street & Vachell Lane1 a.m. 13.7 B p.m. 32.6 D 9. Los Osos Valley Road & NB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 18.5 B p.m. 17.3 B 10. Los Osos Valley Road & S. Higuera Road a.m. 12.4 B p.m. 16.0 B 11. Broad Street & Orcutt Road a.m. 17.7 B p.m. 27.7 C 12. Broad Street & Industrial Way a.m. 10.2 B p.m. 16.6 B 13. Tank Farm Road & Santa Fe Road1 a.m. 1.1 A p.m. 10.6 B 14. Broad Street & Tank Farm Road a.m. 37.1 D p.m. 43.5 D 15. Broad Street & Aero Drive a.m. 8.8 A p.m. 13.8 B 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.3-4 Existing Conditions, Level of Service Summary Intersection Peak Hour Average Delay per Vehicle (sec) Level of Service 16. Buckley Road & Santa Fe Road1 a.m. 0.1 A p.m. 0.8 A 17. Broad Street & Buckley Road a.m. 17.5 B p.m. 10.9 B Notes: 1 Unsignalized Locations Table 4.3-5 Existing Conditions, Corridor Summary Location Direction Peak Hour Average Travel Speed (mph) Level of Service Tank Farm Road between South Higuera and Broad Street Eastbound a.m. 38.2 B p.m. 34.6 B Westbound a.m. 38.3 B p.m. 37.2 B Table 4.3-6 Existing Conditions, Freeway Segments Location Direction Peak Hour Density (veh/mi/ln) Level of Service U.S. 101 south of Los Osos Valley Road Northbound a.m. 23.7 C p.m. 19.0 C Southbound a.m. 12.5 B p.m. 24.4 C U.S. 101 north of Los Osos Valley Road Northbound a.m. 21.4 C p.m. 17.5 B Southbound a.m. 13.2 B p.m. 23.8 C Source: U.S. 101/Los Osos Valley Rd Interchange PA & ED, September 2007 Fehr & Peers 4.3.2 Regulatory Setting This section discusses the adopted plans relevant to traffic and circulation. 4.3.2.1 Federal The federal government delegates the responsibilities of the maintenance and regulation of roadways to state and local governments. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.3.2.2 State Caltrans maintains the state highway system, including U.S. Highway 101, State Routes 227, 166, 33, 41, and 46, which provide access to collector, access, and local roads in the Project area. Caltrans generally regulates maximum load limits for trucks and safety requirements for oversized vehicles for operation on highways. 4.3.2.3 Local San Luis Obispo Council of Governments The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) is a joint powers authority with a goal of facilitating cooperative regional and sub regional planning, coordination, and technical assistance on issues of mutual concern. SLOCOG is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency and thereby responsible for all regional transportation planning and programming activities, including developing the Regional Transportation Plan. The Regional Transportation Plan guides transportation policy and is updated every five years. Starting with the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan (underway, expected completion late 2014), SLOCOG will be required to develop a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) that identifies land use patterns expected to reduce vehicle miles traveled. San Luis Obispo County General Plan Chapter 5 of Framework for Planning and the Circulation Chapter of the San Luis Obispo Area Plan constitute the County’s Circulation Element for the Project area. The circulation goals from Framework for Planning are as follows: 1. Provide for a land use pattern and rate of population growth that will not exceed the financial ability of the county and its residents to expand and maintain the circulation system. 2. Plan transportation system improvements to provide for, but not exceed, the capacities that are needed to serve the travel demand generated by the year 2010 population, consistent with the land use patterns allowed by the Land Use Element and the cities' general plans, so that growth is not facilitated or induced in inappropriate amounts or locations. 3. Integrate land use and transportation planning so that necessary transportation facilities and services can be provided to accommodate urban and rural development. 4. Coordinate the transportation system between different modes of travel, sensitive to the needs and desires of citizens in a manner that will provide an optimum benefit for the investment of public funds. 5. Recognize public transit and carpooling as very important components of the county's strategy to provide adequate circulation and to reduce dependency on the automobile. 6. Develop and coordinate transportation programs that reinforce federal, state, regional and local agency goals. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 7. Design a transportation system that provides for safe travel within attainable, feasible economic and technical means. 8. Design transportation facilities with the intent to preserve important natural resources and features, promote the esthetic quality of the region and minimize environmental changes. 9. Develop and enhance a system of scenic roads and highways through areas of scenic beauty without imposing undue restrictions on private property, or unnecessarily restricting the placement of agricultural support facilities in agricultural and rural areas. 10. Encourage policies for new development to finance adequate additional circulation and access as a result of increased traffic it will cause. San Luis Obispo County Code The San Luis Obispo County Code implements the General Plan and provides more specific criteria for development. Traffic regulations, including traffic control devices and turning movements, are articulated in the San Luis Obispo County Code, Title 15, Vehicles and Traffic SLOC 2009c). Title 22, Land Use Ordinance, provides standards for proposed developments and new land uses to include parking, street, and frontage requirements. Title 13, Roads and Bridges – Streets and Sidewalks, establishes a road improvement fee to pay for road facilities and improvements related to new development. The County can offer a reimbursement agreement to a developer who constructs a road facility or improvement that exceeds the impact mitigation needs of the new development (SLOC 2009d). San Luis Obispo City General Plan The City’s Circulation Element of the General Plan was adopted in 1994, and was last revised in 2006. The Circulation Element includes the following goals related to transportation: Goal 1: Maintain accessibility and protect the environment throughout San Luis Obispo while reducing dependence on single-occupant use of motor vehicles, with the goal of achieving state and federal health standards for air quality. Goal 2: Reduce people's use of their cars by supporting and promoting alternatives such as walking, riding buses and bicycles, and using car pools. Goal 3: Provide a system of streets that are well-maintained and safe for all forms of transportation. Goal 4: Widen and extend streets only when there is a demonstrated need and when the projects will cause no significant, long-term environmental problems. Goal 5: Make the downtown more functional and enjoyable for pedestrians. Goal 6: Promote the safe operation of all modes of transportation. Goal 7: Coordinate the planning of transportation with other affected agencies such as San Luis Obispo County, Caltrans, and Cal Poly. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Goal 8: Reduce the need for travel by private vehicle through land use strategies, telecommuting, and compact work weeks. The City’s Land Use and Circulation Elements are currently being updated and are scheduled to be complete in 2014. Margarita Area Specific Plan The City’s 2004 Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP) encompasses the 420 acre area bounded by South Higuera Street, Broad Street, Tank Farm Road, and the South Street hills ridge. The MASP calls for transit oriented development in the area, with predominantly residential and business park land uses. Once extended, Prado Road would serve as the primary vehicle connection between the Margarita Area and the rest of the community. Airport Area Specific Plan The City’s 2005 Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) sets a planning framework for the 1,500 acre Airport Area, south of the Margarita Area. The AASP calls for the extension of Prado Road, Buckley Road, and Santa Fe Road as a part of its Circulation system, as well as the widening of Tank Farm Road and the construction of the Unocal Collector. Orcutt Area Specific Plan The City’s 2010 Orcutt Area Specific Plan (OASP) encompasses 231 acres roughly bounded by Tank Farm Road, Orcutt Road, and the Union Pacific Railroad. The OASP area consists primarily of residential and open space land uses. A preliminary analysis of the project’s consistency with applicable transportation plans and polices is provided in Appendix E. 4.3.3 Significance Criteria Intersections were evaluated for potential impacts based upon impact criteria established by the County and City. These impacts are defined as follows: Signalized intersections: a significant impact would occur if the addition of Project traffic degrades operations from LOS D or better to LOS E or F; or if project traffic is added to an intersection operating at LOS E or F. Unsignalized intersections: a significant impact would occur if the addition of Project traffic causes intersection operations to degrade to an unacceptable level and the peak hour signal warrant is met. All intersections: a significant impact would occur if the Project’s access to a public street causes a potentially unsafe situation. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities: a significant impact would occur if the Project conflicts with existing or planned pedestrian or bicycle facilities; or if the Project creates a pedestrian or bicycle demand without providing adequate facilities. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Transit facilities: a significant impact would occur if the Project conflicts with existing or planned facilities; or if the Project does not provide adequate facilities for pedestrians and cyclists to access transit routes and stops. Construction: a significant impact would occur if construction activities create a potentially unsafe situation or conflict with existing or planned transportation facilities. 4.3.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The remediation phase of the Project would generate traffic from employees and contractors accessing the site, trucks hauling hydrocarbon-affected soils, equipment delivery, and hauling of other materials. The Project’s proposed truck routes are shown on Figure 4.3-4. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact T.1 Remediation activities related to the Project could result in potentially significant impacts to roadways in the Project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles creating an unsafe situation. Remediation Class II Remediation activity is expected to involve between 29 to 45 employees, plus extra truck drivers as needed. Approximately 196,250 cubic yards of materials (including a 25 percent contingency factor) are expected to be exported from the site, and 82,000 cubic yards of fill would be imported. Assuming a typical capacity of 15 cubic yards per truck, this corresponds to 13,083 round trips for materials export and 5,467 round trips for materials import. These trips are expected to occur over a two-year period. The highest intensity of truck traffic is expected to occur during months 21 and 22 of the remediation process, when activities will focus on Reservoirs 5 and 7, and the North Marsh area. Approximately 177 heavy truck round trips are expected per day at this time. Approximately 45 auto round trips are expected for employees on the site during this time. Assuming a heavy truck is equivalent to 1.5 passenger cars (Highway Capacity Manual, 2000) these volumes correspond to 311 daily passenger car trips (177*1.5 + 45). Given that these trips would be spread throughout the day, remediation trip generation is significantly lower than the trip generation associated with the development phase of the Project. However, the heavy vehicle traffic and temporary traffic control on Tank Farm Road would potentially obstruct the flow of vehicle and bicycle traffic resulting in potentially unsafe conditions. Double trailer trucks interacting with standard commuter traffic could produce greater accident potential and the potential for roadway damage. In addition, remediation activities may overlap with the reconstruction of the Los Osos Valley Road/U.S. 101 interchange, exacerbating construction impacts. The development of construction traffic management plans would ensure that construction activities are performed in a safe manner and minimize impacts to the public. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-4 Proposed Truck Routes Source: RAP AVOCET 2007 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures T-1 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall develop a construction traffic management plan for review and approval by the County Public Works department in consultation with City Public Works and Caltrans. The plan shall include at least the following items: 1. Identification of haul routes for materials hauling and equipment deliveries. This section shall include a Haul Permit from Santa Barbara County Public Works. 2. Monitoring program for street surface conditions so that damage or debris resulting from construction or remediation of the Project can be identified and corrected by the Applicant. 3. A traffic control plan showing proposed temporary traffic control measures, including lane closure procedures, accommodation for pedestrians and cyclists, and removal procedures for the temporary traffic control devices and added lanes. 4. A scheduling plan showing hours of operation to minimize traffic congestion during peak hours and special events. 5. The use of electronic message signs providing the traveling public with current construction information and the availability of alternate travel routes. 6. A park and ride program to reduce the number of worker single occupant vehicle trips going to the site. Residual Impacts The preparation of an adequate construction traffic management plan would reduce impact T.1 to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.3.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The Project would redevelop a portion of the Project Site once remediation activities are complete. The City Development Plan would consist of five phases, spread over a 25-year period. Once all phases are complete, the Project would include approximately 800,000 square feet of Business Park and service commercial uses, approximately 15 acres of recreation fields, and approximately 250 acres of conservation and open space areas. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.3.5.1 Analysis of Traffic Impacts Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact T.2 The addition of traffic generated by the Project would cause one intersection to operate at unacceptable levels under Existing plus Project conditions. Development Class III Project Trip Generation Traffic-generating characteristics of many land uses have been surveyed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The results of these traffic generation studies are published in a handbook titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition, which has become the industry standard for estimating traffic generation for different land uses. Most of the proposed Project land uses are included in the handbook (e.g., light industrial, industrial park, manufacturing, mini-warehouse, hotel, veterinary clinic, office park, research and development center, retail, and vehicle service). Some of the proposed uses are not specifically stated but would operate similar to land uses evaluated in the handbook. For example, the recreation park, fire station and training facility, and wastewater treatment facility trip generation for the County Development Plan) was based on anticipated usage. The vehicle trip generation for the transit maintenance center was based upon a similar use studied for Los Angeles County. Table 4.3-7 summarizes the estimated worst-case trip generation for the City Development Plan. Under this scenario, the City Development Plan would generate 8,193 weekday daily trips with 1,039 a.m. and 1,068 p.m. peak hour trips. Table 4.3-7 Estimated Project Traffic Generation- City Development Plan Land Use Daily Weekday Trips a.m. Peak Hour Trips p.m. Peak Hour Trips In Out Total In Out Total Business Park 5,121 588 96 684 116 488 604 Commercial Services 2,878 252 74 326 126 249 375 Public Facilities 194 22 7 29 46 43 89 Total 8,193 862 177 1,039 288 780 1,068 Note: Trips include pass-by and internalization reductions. See Table 2 of Appendix D for further details. Distribution and Assignment of Project Traffic The directions of approach and departure to the Project Site constitute the trip distribution, which is shown on Figure 4.3-5. A primary factor affecting trip distribution is the spatial distribution of residences for employees and visitors and distribution of vendors and support facilities in the community which would generate Project trip origins and destinations. The estimated Project directional trip distribution is also based on the study area roadway network, traffic flow patterns in and out of this area of the City and County and consistency with previously approved traffic studies for this area. The Project trip assignment is shown on Figure 4.3-6. These Project trips are added to the existing traffic volumes to develop Existing plus Project conditions. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-5 Project Trip Distribution Source: Overland 2012 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-6 Project Trip Assignment (a.m./p.m.) Source: Overland 2012 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Evaluation of traffic flows associated with the existing conditions with the Project added, provides a slightly different distribution pattern than Cumulative without Project and Cumulative with Project because improvements to Prado Road are expected to change travel patterns in the area. Cumulative impacts are discussed in the Cumulative Section. Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions with the City Development Plan To assess impacts associated with Existing plus Project conditions, Project impacts were analyzed as if the Project were constructed and operating today. This analysis does not include any assumptions of growth or change in current traffic levels in the area. See Appendix D for more details on the analysis. Table 4.3-8 summarizes the intersection operations under current conditions both with and without the City Development Plan. Table 4.3-8 Existing Plus Project, Intersection Conditions Intersection Peak Hour Existing Existing + Project Significant ImpactDelay1LOSDelay1LOSChange 1. Broad Street & South St/Santa Barbara St a.m. 23.8 C 25.3 C +1.5 NO p.m. 28.8 C 29.3 C +0.5 NO 2. Madonna Road & NB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 19.4 B 19.4 B +0.0 NO p.m. 25.2 C 25.4 C +0.2 NO 3. Madonna Road & SB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 29.5 C 29.5 C +0.0 NO p.m. 36.4 D 36.5 D +0.1 NO 4. NB U.S. 101 Off Ramp/Elks Ln & NB U.S. 101 On Ramp/Prado Rd2 a.m. 9.3 A 9.7 A +0.4 NO p.m. 19.7 C 23.4 C +3.7 NO 5. Prado Road & S Higuera St a.m. 18.6 B 20.7 C +2.1 NO p.m. 23.7 C 25.1 C +1.4 NO 6. Los Osos Valley Road & SB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 22.0 C 23.8 C +1.8 NO p.m. 22.2 C 27.8 C +5.6 NO 7. S Higuera St & Tank Farm Road a.m. 23.2 C 43.7 D +20.5 NO p.m. 28.3 C 39.3 D +11.0 NO 8. S Higuera St & Vachell Lane2 a.m. 13.7 B 35.8 E +22.1 NO' p.m. 32.6 D 64.2 F +31.6 NO' 9. Los Osos Valley Road & NB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 18.5 B 22.9 C +4.4 NO p.m. 17.3 B 20.3 C +3.0 NO 10. Los Osos Valley Road & S Higuera St a.m. 12.4 B 14.3 B +1.9 NO p.m. 16.0 B 23.9 C +7.9 NO 11. Broad Street & Orcutt Road a.m. 17.7 B 19.7 B +2.0 NO p.m. 27.7 C 38.4 C +10.7 NO 12. Broad Street & Industrial Way a.m. 10.2 B 11.2 B +1.0 NO p.m. 16.6 B 17.9 B +1.3 NO 13. Tank Farm Road & Santa Fe Road2 a.m. 1.1 A 20.2 C +19.1 NO p.m. 10.6 B 20.9 C +10.3 NO 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.3-8 Existing Plus Project, Intersection Conditions Intersection Peak Hour Existing Existing + Project Significant ImpactDelay1LOSDelay1LOSChange 14. Broad Street & Tank Farm Road a.m. 37.1 D 59.2 E +22.1 YES p.m. 43.5 D 70.9 E +27.4 YES 15. Broad Street & Aero Drive a.m. 8.8 A 9.0 A +0.2 NO p.m. 13.8 B 14.1 B +0.3 NO 16. Buckley Road & Santa Fe Road2 a.m. 0.1 A 0.3 A +0.2 NO p.m. 0.8 A 1.8 A +1.0 NO 17. Broad Street & Buckley Road a.m. 17.5 B 24.1 C +6.6 NO p.m. 10.9 B 14.3 B +3.4 NO Notes: 1 Average delay per vehicle in seconds. 2 Unsignalized intersection. Table 4.3-9 summarizes the corridor operations with the City Development Plan added. No significant corridor impacts have been identified. Table 4.3-9 Existing Plus Project, Corridor Summary Location Direction Peak Hour Average Travel Speed (mph) Level of Service Tank Farm Road between South Higuera and Broad Street* Eastbound a.m. 34.3 B p.m. 22.7 C Westbound a.m. 31.7 B p.m. 27.4 C Analysis reflects four lanes of travel on Tank Farm Road, consistent with the Project Description. The freeway operating conditions are summarized in Table 4.3-10. No significant impacts have been identified to freeway segments. Table 4.3-10 Existing Plus Project, Freeway Conditions Location Direction Peak Hour Density (veh/mi/ln) Level of Service U.S. 101 south of Los Osos Valley Road Northbound a.m. 25.0 C p.m. 19.4 C Southbound a.m. 12.2 B p.m. 24.6 C U.S. 101 north of Los Osos Valley Road Northbound a.m. 21.8 C p.m. 17.6 B Southbound a.m. 13.0 B p.m. 22.9 C 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Significant impacts associated with existing conditions with the Project traffic levels could occur at the following location: Broad Street and Tank Farm Road – a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The impact related to this location is discussed below. Broad Street and Tank Farm Road – The addition of Phase 1 Project traffic during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours would worsen operations from LOS D to LOS E. The design and installation of a second eastbound left turn lane would improve operations to a LOS D during both time periods. A second eastbound left turn lane was recently completed by the City using Airport Area Impact Fees as part of a major improvement project at this intersection. The Project would pay into the City Airport Area Impact Fee account as part of the City Development Plan. With the recently completed second eastbound left hand turn lane the Broad Street and Tank Farm Road intersection would operate at an LOS of D during both time periods, which would make the impact less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts With the recently completed addition of a second eastbound left hand turn lane at the Broad Street and Tank Farm Road intersection, the traffic impact to intersections would be less than significant (Class III). 4.3.5.2 Analysis of Transit, Bicycle, Pedestrian Site Access, On-site Circulation, and Parking Impacts Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact T.3 Impacts to the City’s transit system could result due to increased ridership generated by the Project; impacts to bicycle and pedestrian facilities could result from network discontinuities and unsafe crossings; impacts to site access and on-site circulation could result from queue spillback and the creation of additional conflict points. Development Class II Transit Analysis The City’s 2009 Short Range Transit Plan summarizes near-term changes planned for the transit network. The plan includes a new cross-town route connecting the eastern and southern portions of the City with the Madonna Plaza area. This route would serve Tank Farm Road between South Higuera Street and Broad Street with one bus per hour. The Airport Area Specific Plan AASP) describes a similar route, and calls for the implementation of transit service in the area as development levels become supportive of transit. The Project would burden the planned cross-town transit route’s capacity by generating more than 50 peak hour transit trips (see Appendix D for detailed calculations). In addition, the 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR majority of transit funding that is received by the City and County is derived from population statistics. Since the Project does not specifically generate a new population increase there is little likelihood that the Project will generate additional transit funding to pay for the operational costs of expanding transit service in the area. This is a potentially significant impact. Bicycle Analysis The City’s 2007 Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP), Figure 2C, shows existing and planned bicycle facilities. Numerous bikeways exist in the study area, and more are planned. Planned bicycle facilities in the study area include: 1. A Class I bike path along both sides of Tank Farm Road from Santa Fe Road to the Unocal Collector; 2. A Class I bike path connecting Tank Farm Road to Buckley Road along Tank Farm Creek; 3. A Class I bike path along the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek from Tank Farm Road to Esperanza Lane; 4. A Class I bike path along Acacia Creek from Tank Farm Road to the Damon Garcia sports fields near Industrial Way; 5. Class I bike paths and Class II bike lanes along the Prado Road extension; 6. Class I bike path and Class II bike lanes on Buckley Road; 7. Class II bike lanes on Esperanza and Vachell Lane; 8. Class II bike lanes on the future Unocal Collector Road between Tank Farm Road and the future Prado Road extension; and 9. Class II bike lanes on Santa Fe Road from Buckley Road to Prado Road. Facilities numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9 pass through the Project site or along the Project frontage. The Project proposes the following changes to the planned bicycle facilities within or along the Project site: Instead of a Class I bike path on both sides of Tank Farm Road (per #1 above), the Project would construct a single 12-foot multi-use path in a 20-foot easement on the north side of Tank Farm Road. The Project would not construct the Class I bike path connecting Tank Farm Road to Buckley Road along Tank Farm Creek (per #2 above). The Project would not construct the Unocal Collector Road and associated bike lanes (per #8 above). Some of the Class I bike path alignments shown in the Bicycle Transportation Plan would be modified. For example, the path shown crossing the Project Site from north to south in the Bike Plan is proposed to go around the northwestern perimeter of the Project Site. Similarly, the bike path along San Luis Creek follows the Project boundary west rather than following the creek as planned. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR These inconsistencies with the City’s Bike Plan could result in a discontinuous bicycle network and the potential for uncontrolled crossings of Tank Farm Road, which are potentially significant impacts. Pedestrian Analysis The City’s Circulation Element and the AASP emphasize the importance of a walkable community. The Project would increase the demand for pedestrian travel, both within the site and between the site and external land uses. While detailed site plans are not available at this time, the preliminary plans provide typical public street cross-sections illustrating the planned pedestrian facilities within the developed portions of the site. The Project would provide sidewalks along both sides of all public roads on the site, including Roads A, B, and C, Santa Fe Road, and Tank Farm Road. Most sidewalks would be separated from the roadway by a planter area and, in some cases, a parking lane. In addition to sidewalks, the planned Class I bike paths adjacent to Tank Farm Road, Prado Road, and along the East Fork of San Luis Obispo and Acacia creeks would also serve pedestrians, so inconsistencies with the BTP could result in a discontinuous pedestrian network and the potential for uncontrolled crossings of Tank Farm Road, which are potentially significant impacts. Site Access Vehicular site access to the northeastern portion of the Project Site from the south is proposed via Santa Fe Road (i.e., refer to Santa Fe Road and Roads A and B, Figure 2-18), and a driveway on Tank Farm Road serving the northwestern parcel of the Project Site. Once complete, the Prado Road extension will provide an additional route to access the northeastern portion of the Project Site from the north via Santa Fe Road. The following potential impacts related to site access have been identified. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road: Under Existing plus Project conditions during the a.m. peak hour, the eastbound left turn movement would exceed the storage capacity of the turn pocket and spill back on to Tank Farm Road, which could create a potentially unsafe situation. The 95th percentile queues are projected to exceed 350 feet, thereby blocking through traffic. Tank Farm Road/Northwestern Parcel Driveways: Two driveways are proposed on Tank Farm Road at the northwestern parcel (i.e., an eastern and a western driveway which are approximately 200 feet apart). The eastern driveway would be a right in/right out only access point and the western driveway would permit all turning movements. The northwestern parcel would generate its highest level of traffic during the p.m. peak hour, with 31 vehicles entering and 59 exiting. The western full-access driveway would be located less than 200 feet from other driveways to the east (i.e., the “eastern driveway” referenced above) and west (off of the Project Site). This full access driveway would require a median break, which conflicts with the AASP plans for the Tank Farm Road cross-section. Given the proximity of adjacent driveways and the amount and speed of traffic on Tank Farm Road, in order to maintain roadway capacity and reduce safety concerns, it is recommended that left-turn access to the northwestern parcel be consolidated into one location only with adjacent parcels to minimize the potential for vehicular conflicts. One potential consolidated access point is proposed in 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Tentative Tract Map 3009 (located immediately west of the Project Site), and would require coordination with nearby property owners. On-site Circulation Detailed plans showing on-site circulation have not yet been prepared. If improperly designed, site access and internal circulation could result in hazardous conditions for cyclists, pedestrians, and transit users. This is a potentially significant impact. Parking Parking for each of the components of the Project would be based upon what is required by code. Adequate code required parking for the components of the Project would need to be verified upon application for building permits. No parking impacts are anticipated with this Project. Mitigation Measures T-3a Site Access (Northeastern Parcel): Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall install a multi-lane roundabout at the new intersection of Tank Farm Road and northern leg of Santa Fe Road accessing the Project Site. This improvement is consistent with the intersection control in the AASP. Also the Applicant shall extend the existing four lane section of Tank Farm Road thru the multilane roundabout. Transit: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall install transit facilities along Tank Farm Road to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department with direct pedestrian and bicycle connections to buildings on the Project Site. The Applicant shall also work with the City and SLO Transit to ensure that transit service capacity is adequate to serve the projected demand. Bicycle and Pedestrian: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall, at a minimum, install the following bicycle and pedestrian facilities: 1) a continuous Class I multi-use path along the north side of Tank Farm Road, 2) City standard 6.5 foot wide Class II bike lanes on the north and south sides of Tank Farm Road between the east and west boundaries of the entire Project Site along with appropriate transitions to existing Tank Farm Road, 3) a Class I multi-use path between Tank Farm Road and the southern limits of the Project Site connecting to the Avila Ranch’ development project, 4) a Class I multi-use path through the north-west portion of the property (old Chevron Collector street location) with a provision to allow construction of a City sewer connection to the lift station, and 5) a Class I multi- use path through the north-east portion of the site linking the properties to the east to the Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road intersection. The precise alignment of these Class I paths shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development and Public Works Directors. T-3b Site Access (Northwestern Parcel): Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development, the Applicant shall redesign its major access to the northwestern parcel so that it is consolidated with adjacent parcels to minimize the potential for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts and to prevent a break in the median on Tank Farm 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Road. The recommended consolidated access point is proposed as a part of Tentative Tract Map 3009 and would require coordination with other property owners. Residual Impacts With the implementation of the recommended mitigation, Impact T.3 would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.3.5.3 Analysis of Construction Impacts The City Development Plan would generate construction traffic associated with the development of the site, including the delivery of equipment and materials and construction employees accessing the site. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact T.4 The proposed construction phasing plan would disrupt vehicle and bicycle travel for an extended duration, and the proposed truck routes are inconsistent with the City's Circulation Element. Construction activities related to the Project could result in potentially significant impacts to roadways in the Project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles. Development Class II Truck Routes Figure 5 of the City’s Circulation Element shows the City’s truck routes, which include Tank Farm Road, South Higuera Street, Prado Road, and U.S. Highway 101. The truck route for transporting materials to and from destinations to the south on U.S. Highway 101 is proposed via either the Los Osos Valley Road interchange or the South Higuera Street interchange. Access to and from destinations to the north on U.S. Highway 101 is proposed via either the Los Osos Valley Road interchange or the Prado Road on-ramp. Site access would be provided via a single access point on Tank Farm Road controlled by a temporary traffic signal. The City's truck route map and on-street signage indicate that Los Osos Valley Road is not a truck route. The Project's truck routes are therefore inconsistent with the City's Circulation Element. This is a potentially significant impact. Construction Traffic An estimated 1,624 total truck round trips per phase of the Project would be required for the delivery of construction materials and equipment, with a peak intensity of 110 daily truck round trips. Approximately 150 employees would work on site, resulting in approximately 150 daily round trips. This is substantially less than the traffic projected for both the remediation phase and trip generation associated with the Project. The Project's infrastructure phasing plan shows that the construction of frontage and surface improvements to Tank Farm Road are planned to occur in a discontinuous manner over the first four phases. Similarly, the Class I bike path along Tank Farm Road would be constructed piece by piece, and would not be continuous until Phase 5 of the Project is complete. This phasing plan would result in persistent construction activities throughout the development of the Project, and 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR would require many redundant truck trips as staging and equipment delivery would have to occur as each phase's infrastructure improvements are constructed. This level of construction would substantially disrupt vehicle and bicycle travel. This is a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures T-4 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall submit a construction traffic management plan that includes a revised phasing plan minimizing the duration of construction. In addition to the components described in mitigation measure T-1a, the plan shall ensure that adjacent sections of infrastructure be modified at the same time to minimize disruption of travel. The plan shall include proposed truck routes that do not use the Los Osos Valley Road interchange. The construction traffic management plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City’s Public Works Department in consultation with County Public Works and Caltrans. Residual Impacts With the implementation of the recommended mitigation, Impact T.4 would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.3.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The County Development Plan aspect of the Project would involve site remediation as analyzed in section 4.3.4 and development in accordance with the County’s existing General Plan zoning designations, but with different acreages than specified in the General Plan. Table 4.3-11 summarizes the estimated trip generation for the County Development Plan. Table 4.3-11 County Development Plan Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Daily Weekday Trips a.m. Peak Hour Trips p.m. Peak Hour Trips Commercial Service 5,658 695 654 Industrial 2,368 322 336 Recreation 69 0 60 Total 8,095 1,017 1,050 The total trip generation for the County Development Plan is 8,095 daily weekday trips, lower than the 8,193 daily trips generated by the City Development Plan. More of the Project’s traffic would be generated by development on the northwestern parcels under the County Development Plan. The County Development Plan would not result in additional transportation impacts beyond those identified for the City Development Project because it would generate fewer vehicle trips. Mitigation measures required for the City Development Plan would also be applicable to the County Development Plan, except that transit service would be the responsibility of RTA instead of SLO Transit. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.3.7 Cumulative Analysis 4.3.7.1 Analysis of Cumulative Traffic Conditions with the City Development Plan Additional analysis examined the potential impacts of the Project in the timeframe when it may actually be constructed and operational (i.e., approximately 27 years from date of approval, including the remediation phase). This scenario includes development associated with the build- out of the City's General Plan, as well as the infrastructure improvements detailed below. Future year traffic forecasts were developed using the City's Travel Demand Forecasting Model, which estimates future traffic levels resulting from the development of currently vacant parcels in the City. The Cumulative traffic volumes without the Project are shown on Figures 4.3-7 and 4.3-8. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact T.5 The addition of Project traffic would cause nine intersections and two freeway segments to operate at unacceptable levels under Cumulative conditions. Development Class I Table 4.3-12 summarizes intersection operations under Cumulative conditions with and without the Project. The “Cumulative Without” and “With Project” includes future planned improvements as follows: A full freeway interchange will be constructed at Prado Road and U.S. 101 Freeway. Prado Road will be extended to connect Madonna Road to Broad Street. The roadway extension and interchange reconstruction will provide the following intersection improvements: Signalization of the new freeway ramps with lane configurations as specified in the Prado Road/U.S. 101 Project Study Report including dual westbound left turns with two westbound through lanes, a northbound left turn lane with a northbound shared through right turn lane, dual westbound through lanes, and a westbound right turn lane. Prado Road and South Higuera Street will be expanded to provide second east and westbound through lanes and a new westbound right turn lane. Prado Road and Broad Street will be reconstructed with one left turn lane, one through lane and one shared through right turn lane northbound, one left turn lane, two through lanes and one right turn lane southbound, one left turn lane, one shared left through lane and one right turn lane eastbound and one shared left, through, right turn lane westbound. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-7 Cumulative AM Traffic Volumes Without Project Source: Overland 2012 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.3-8 Cumulative PM Traffic Volumes Without Project Source: Overland 2012 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.3-12 Cumulative Plus Project, Intersection Conditions Intersection Peak Hour Future (2035) Cumulative Without Project Cumulative Future Cumulative With Project Significant Impact? Delay1 LOS Change Delay1 LOS Change 1. Broad Street & South St/Santa Barbara Ave a.m. 32.6 C +8.8 35.4 D +2.8 NO p.m. 33.4 C +4.6 34.4 C +1.0 NO 2. Madonna Road & NB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 17.4 B -2.0 17.6 B +0.2 NO p.m. 23.7 C -1.5 24.0 C +0.3 NO 3. Madonna Road & SB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 25.5 C -4.0 25.9 C +0.4 NO p.m. 28.5 C -7.9 28.6 C +0.1 NO 4. NB U.S. 101 Off Ramp/Elks Ln & NB U.S. 101 On Ramp/ Prado Rd a.m. 12.3 B +3.0 13.7 B +1.4 NO p.m. 15.8 B -3.9 15.7 B -0.1 NO 5. Prado Road & S Higuera St a.m. 63.9 E +45.3 94.8 F +30.9 YES p.m. 92.7 F +69.0 117.0 F +24.3 YES 6. Los Osos Valley Road SB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 51.7 D +29.7 59.8 E +8.1 YES p.m. 52.7 D +30.5 59.4 E +6.7 YES 7. S Higuera Street & Tank Farm Road a.m. 78.2 E +55.0 110.1 F +31.9 YES p.m. 93.1 F +64.8 126.2 F +33.1 YES 8. S Higuera Street & Vachell Lane2 a.m. 459.0 F +445.3 414.0 F -45.0 YES p.m. 677.3 F +644.7 623.4 E -53.9 YES 9. Los Osos Valley Road NB U.S. 101 On/Off Ramps a.m. 23.0 C +4.5 24.2 C +1.2 NO p.m. 17.0 B -0.3 18.0 B +1.0 NO 10. Los Osos Valley Road S Higuera Road a.m. 25.8 C +13.4 40.3 D +14.5 NO p.m. 118.0 F +102.0 152.1 F +34.1 YES 11. Broad Street & Orcutt Road a.m. 29.9 C +12.2 33.1 D +3.2 NO p.m. 45.7 D +18.0 50.2 D +4.5 NO 12. Broad Street & Industrial Way a.m. 18.6 B +8.4 19.7 B +1.1 NO p.m. 30.1 C +13.5 34.1 C +4.0 NO 13. Tank Farm Road & Santa Fe Road2 a.m. 12.5 B +11.4 20.3 C +7.8 NO p.m. 22.6 C +12.0 86.3 F +63.7 YES 14. Broad Street & Tank Farm Road a.m. 53.2 D +16.1 86.5 E +33.3 YES p.m. 57.1 E +13.6 63.4 E +6.3 YES 15. Broad Street & Aero Drive a.m. 10.2 B +1.4 10.3 B +0.1 NO p.m. 25.9 C +12.1 26.6 C +0.7 NO 16. Buckley Road & Santa Fe Road a.m. 0.5 A +0.4 0.7 A +0.2 NO p.m. 0.9 A +0.1 2.0 A +1.1 NO 17. Broad Street & Buckley Road a.m. 31.5 C +14.0 40.4 D +8.9 NO p.m. 259.9 F +249.0 286.6 F +26.7 YES 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.3-12 Cumulative Plus Project, Intersection Conditions Intersection Peak Hour Future (2035) Cumulative Without Project Cumulative Future Cumulative With Project Significant Impact? Delay1 LOS Change Delay1 LOS Change 18. Broad Street & Prado Road (NEW) a.m. 51.8 D 61.4 E +9.6 YES p.m. 28.8 C 32.4 C +3.6 NO 1 Average delay per vehicle in seconds. 2 Unsignalized intersection. The Los Osos Valley Road and U.S. Highway 101 will be reconstructed as detailed in the Los Osos Valley Road/U.S. Highway 101 Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration. Two alternatives were evaluated in the document. Alternative 6, which relocates the southbound ramps to the new Calle Joaquin, was used as future conditions in this analysis as it provides the more conservative scenario. Since the issuance of the NOP, Alternative 3 has been selected for construction, which will result in better traffic operations than Alternative 6.The improvement includes widening the Los Osos Valley Road overcrossing of the U.S. Highway 101 Freeway to two lanes in each direction. The improvement also modifies the southbound U.S. Highway 101 on- and off-ramps to connect to Calle Joaquin Road which eliminates the existing southbound off-ramp connection to Los Osos Valley Road. Tank Farm Road will be widened to four lanes between South Higuera Street and Broad Street with a two-lane roundabout at the Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road intersection. The Project includes this widening, but proposes a traffic signal at the Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road intersection instead of a roundabout and a new local street connection just west of the project Site. Tank Farm Road and Broad Street will be widened to provide a second eastbound left turn lane and second northbound left turn lane. This improvement has been constructed since the issuance of the NOP. As indicated in Table 4.3-12, the following intersections have been identified as having Cumulative conditions that are potentially substandard to adopted City thresholds. Impacts from the Chevron project are cumulatively considerable and may have potentially significant impacts under Cumulative with Project traffic conditions. These locations are: South Higuera Street and Prado Road– The addition of Project traffic creates significant traffic impacts during the a.m. and p.m. Peak Hours. Los Osos Valley Road and Southbound U.S. Highway 101 On/Off Ramps – The addition of Project traffic creates significant traffic impacts during the a.m. and p.m. Peak Hours. South Higuera Street and Tank Farm Road – The addition of project traffic creates significant traffic impacts during the a.m. and p.m. Peak Hours. South Higuera Street and Vachell Lane – The addition of Project traffic creates significant traffic impacts during the a.m. and p.m. Peak Hours. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Los Osos Valley Road and South Higuera Street – The addition of Project traffic creates a significant traffic impact during the p.m. Peak Hour. Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road – The addition of Project traffic creates a significant traffic impact during the p.m. Peak Hour. Broad Street and Tank Farm Road – The addition of Project traffic creates significant traffic impacts during the a.m. and p.m. Peak Hours. Broad Street and Buckley Road – The addition of Project traffic creates a significant traffic impact during the p.m. Peak Hour. Prado Road and Broad Street – The addition of Project traffic creates a significant traffic impact during the a.m. peak hour. Table 4.3-13 summarizes Cumulative conditions with the Project along the Tank Farm Road corridor. No Corridor impacts have been identified. Table 4.3-13 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Corridor Summary Location Direction Peak Hour Cumulative Without Project Cumulative With Project Average Travel Speed LOS Average Travel Speed LOS Tank Farm Road between South Higuera and Broad Street Eastbound a.m. 25.3 mph B 22.9 mph C p.m. 21.2 mph C 18.9 mph C Westbound a.m. 30.6 mph B 25.4 mph B p.m. 20.2 mph C 15.3 mph D Table 4.3-14 summarizes Cumulative plus Project freeway operating conditions. The Project would result in a significant and unavoidable impact to U.S. Highway 101, worsening unacceptable operations on both study segments. No feasible mitigation measures have been identified, and a Major Investment Study has yet to be performed identifying long term improvements necessary for U.S. Highway 101 between Los Osos Valley Road and Monterey Street off-ramps within the City of San Luis Obispo. A mobility study for the US 101 corridor is currently being conducted by SLOCOG and will review these issues. The long term impacts of this Project, as well as all other County development, remains significant and unavoidable along U.S. Highway 101. 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.3-14 Cumulative Plus Project, Freeway Conditions Location Direction Peak Hour Cumulative Without Project Cumulative With Project Density veh/mi/ln) LOS Density veh/mi/ln) LOS U.S. Highway 101 south of Los Osos Valley Road Northbound a.m. 36.4 E 39.6 E p.m. 25.3 C 25.9 C Southbound a.m. 17.0 B 17.2 B p.m. 35.7 E 38.7 E U.S. Highway 101 north of Los Osos Valley Road Northbound a.m. 30.6 D 31.9 D p.m. 24.4 C 24.5 C Southbound a.m. 17.5 B 17.9 B p.m. 33.6 D 34.6 D Mitigation Measures T-5a South Higuera Street and Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the right-of-way acquisition and intersection improvements to achieve LOS D operations. These improvements include: installation of second left turn lanes on the northbound, southbound, eastbound approaches; the addition of right turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches; and the addition of overlap phases on the eastbound and westbound approaches as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of either the City or the County Development portions of the Project. This project is not included in the City’s Transportation Impact Fee program or the AASP or MASP impact fee programs. Due to its size and complexity, the City should consider amending this project into one of the City’s impact fee programs. If amended into an impact fee program, the Project shall pay impact fees in accordance with the amended fee program. T-5b Los Osos Valley Road and U.S. 101 Southbound Ramps/Calle Joaquin –The Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of design and installation of a northbound left turn lane added to the future improvement on the Calle Joaquin approach, as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of either the City or the County Development portions of the Project. This project is currently contained in the City’s TIF program as part of the Los Osos valley Road Interchange Project however it will be not be constructed as part of the Interchange project currently underway. T-5c South Higuera Street and Tank Farm Road – Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second westbound right turn lane with an overlap phase concurrent with the southbound left and a second southbound left turn lane, as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of the City Development portions of the Project. T-5d South Higuera Street and Vachell Lane – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR installation of the extension of Buckley Road to South Higuera Street. The AASP impact fee program contains part of the cost associated with the Buckley Road extension, but the impact fee program needs to be updated to reflect new project cost estimates and permitting requirements. T-5e South Higuera Street and Los Osos Valley Road- The applicant shall participate in their pro-rate share of either (1) The right-of-way acquisition, design, and installation a second southbound through lane, second southbound right-turn lane, and an eastbound right turn overlap signal phase concurrent with the northbound left turn; or 2) The extension of Buckley Road to the Los Osos Valley Road interchange (LOVR Bypass). This project is not currently in the City’s Circulation Element and is not contained in any impact fee programs established by the City or County. It is cumulative in nature and the City shall add this project into the TIF or AASP if the Circulation Element Update identifies it as an appropriate infrastructure improvement. T-5f Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road - Mitigation measure T-3a would also mitigate this cumulative impact. T-5g Broad Street and Tank Farm Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a northbound right turn lane, a southbound right turn overlap phase concurrent with the eastbound left, and conversion of the westbound right turn lane to a shared through right turn lane. T-5h Broad Street and Buckley Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound through lane and a second southbound through lane. T-5i Broad Street and Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound left-turn lane. Residual Impacts South Higuera Street and Prado Road – The addition of Project traffic creates significant traffic impacts during the a.m. and p.m. Peak Hours. In order to achieve acceptable levels of service, all four approaches would need to be widened to include dual left turn lanes, two through lanes, and a right turn lane on each approach as required by mitigation measure T-5a. With the implementation of mitigation measure T-5a, the impacts during the a.m. and p.m. Peak Hours would be less than significant (Class II). The improvements would require additional right-of-way not currently under the jurisdiction of the City and potential relocation of existing residences in the property on the northeast corner of the intersection. If the additional right-of- way could not be obtained, then the impact to this intersection would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I). 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Los Osos Valley Road and U.S. Highway 101 Southbound Ramps/Calle Joaquin – With the implementation of mitigation measure T-5b the impact would be less than significant (Class II).. South Higuera Street and Tank Farm Road –The design and installation of a second westbound right turn lane and overlap phase and a second southbound left turn (see mitigation measure T-5c) would reduce the severity of the impact, but the impact would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I). These improvements would require additional right-of-way not currently under the jurisdiction of the City. South Higuera Street and Vachell Lane – With the implementation of mitigation measure T- 5d the impact would be less than significant (Class II).These improvements would require additional right-of-way not currently under the jurisdiction of the City. If the additional right-of- way could not be obtained, then the impact to this intersection would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I). South Higuera Street and Los Osos Valley Road- The design and installation of a second southbound through lane, second southbound right-turn lane, and an eastbound right turn overlap phase concurrent with the northbound left turn (see mitigation measure T-5e) would reduce this impact to a level of less than significant (Class II).. However, the improvements would require additional right-of-way not currently under the jurisdiction of the City. This significant impact would remain significant and unavoidable until the right-of-way is obtained, any secondary impacts are mitigated, and the Project is completed. If the additional right-of-way could not be obtained, then the impact to this intersection would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I). Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road - With the implementation of mitigation measure T-3a the impact would be less than significant (Class II). Broad Street and Tank Farm Road - The design and installation of a northbound right turn lane and design and installation of a southbound right turn overlap phase concurrent with the eastbound left (see mitigation measure T-5g) would reduce this impact to a level of less than significant (Class II). However, the improvement may require additional right-of-way not currently under the jurisdiction of the City. The AASP impact fee program should be amended to include this Project. If the additional right-of-way could not be obtained, then the impact to this intersection would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I). Broad Street and Buckley Road - The design and installation of a second northbound left turn lane, and a second southbound through lane (see mitigation measure T-5h) would reduce this impact to a level of less than significant (Class II). The improvements would require additional right-of-way not currently under the jurisdiction of the City. If the additional right-of-way could not be obtained, then the impact to this intersection would remain significant and unavoidable Class I).Broad Street/Prado Road – With the implementation of mitigation measure T-5i the impact would be less than significant (Class II). U.S. Highway 101 – No feasible mitigation measures have been identified, so this impact remains significant and unavoidable (Class I). With the implementation of the recommended mitigation, one intersection and two freeway segment impacts would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I). Eight intersection impacts 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-37 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). The mitigation measures associated with five of the intersections would require the City to obtain additional right-of-way. If the additional right-of-way could not be obtained, then the impact to these five intersections would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I). 4.3.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.3.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party T-1 The Applicant shall develop a construction traffic management plan for review and approval by the City Public Works department in consultation with County Public Works and Caltrans. The plan shall include at least the following items: 1. Identification of haul routes for materials hauling and equipment deliveries. This section shall include a Haul Permit from Santa Barbara County Public Works. 2. Monitoring program for street surface conditions so that damage or debris resulting from construction or remediation of the Project can be identified and corrected by the Applicant. 3. A traffic control plan showing proposed temporary traffic control measures, including lane closure procedures, accommodation for pedestrians and cyclists, and removal procedures for the temporary traffic control devices and added lanes. 4. A scheduling plan showing hours of operation to minimize traffic congestion during peak hours and special events. 5. The use of electronic message signs providing the traveling public with current construction information and the availability of alternate travel routes. 6. A park and ride program to reduce the number of worker single occupant vehicle trips going to the site. Review and approval of plan City plan: Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit County plan: Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit City plan: City of San Luis Obispo County plan: County of San Luis Obispo 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.3.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party T-3a Site Access (Northeastern Parcel): Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall install a multi-lane roundabout at the new intersection of Tank Farm Road and northern leg Santa Fe Road accessing the Project Site. This improvement is consistent with the intersection control in the AASP. Also the applicant shall extend the existing four lane section of Tank Farm Road thru the multilane roundabout. Transit: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall install transit facilities along Tank Farm Road to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department with direct pedestrian and bicycle connections to buildings on the Project Site. The Applicant shall also work with the City and SLO Transit to ensure that transit service capacity is adequate to serve the projected demand. Bicycle and Pedestrian: Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall, at a minimum, install the following bicycle and pedestrian facilities: 1) a continuous Class I multi-use path along the north side of Tank Farm Road, 2) City standard 6.5 foot wide Class II bike lanes on the north and south sides of Tank Farm Road between the east and west boundaries of the entire Project Site along with appropriate transitions to existing Tank Farm Road, 3) a Class I multi-use path between Tank Farm Road and the southern limits of the Project Site connecting to the ‘Avila Ranch’ development project, 4) a Class I multi-use path through the north- west portion of the property (old Chevron Collector street location) with a provision to allow construction of a City sewer connection to the lift station, and 5) a Class I multi- use path through the north-east portion of the site linking the properties to the east to the Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road intersection. The precise alignment of these Class I paths shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development and Public Works Directors. Review of plans Prior to occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-3b Site Access (Northwestern Parcel): Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development, the Applicant shall redesign its major access to the northwestern parcel so that it is consolidated with adjacent parcels to minimize the potential for vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts and to prevent a break in the median on Tank Farm Road. The recommended consolidated access point is proposed as a part of Tentative Tract Map 3009 and would require coordination with other property owners. Review of site plan Prior to occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-4 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall submit a construction traffic management Review and approval of Prior to issuance of City of San Luis Obispo 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-39 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party plan that includes a revised phasing plan minimizing the duration of construction. In addition to the components described in mitigation measure T-1a, the plan shall ensure that adjacent sections of infrastructure be modified at the same time to minimize disruption of travel. The plan shall include proposed truck routes that do not use the Los Osos Valley Road interchange. The construction traffic management plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City's Public Works Department in consultation with County Public Works and Caltrans. plan applicable construction permit T-5a: South Higuera Street and Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the right-of-way acquisition and intersection improvements to achieve LOS D operations. These improvements include: installation of second left turn lanes on the northbound, southbound, eastbound approaches; the addition of right turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches; and the addition of overlap phases on the eastbound and westbound approaches as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of either the City or the County Development portions of the Project. This project is not included in the City’s Transportation Impact Fee program or the AASP or MASP impact fee programs. Due to its size and complexity, the City should consider amending this project into one of the City’s impact fee programs. If amended into an impact fee program, the Project shall pay impact fees in accordance with the amended fee program. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of each Phase of buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-5b Los Osos Valley Road and U.S. 101 Southbound Ramps/Calle Joaquin –The Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of design and installation of a northbound left turn lane added to the future improvement on the Calle Joaquin approach, as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of either the City or the County Development portions of the Project. This project is currently contained in the City’s TIF program as part of the Los Osos Valley Road Interchange Project however it will be not be constructed as part of the Interchange project currently underway. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of Phase 2 buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-5c South Higuera Street and Tank Farm Road – Prior to the occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second westbound right turn lane with an overlap phase concurrent with the southbound left and a second southbound left turn lane, as determined by the City and the level of impact associated with the contribution of the City Development portions of the Project. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-5d South Higuera Street and Vachell Lane – Prior to the Inspection Prior to City of San 4.3 Transportation and Circulation Chevron Tank Farm 4.3-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of (the extension of Buckley Road to South Higuera Street. The AASP impact fee program contains part of the cost associated with the Buckley Road extension, but the impact fee program needs to be updated to reflect new project cost estimates and permitting requirements. of modification occupancy of each Phase of buildings/ development Luis Obispo T-5e South Higuera Street and Los Osos Valley Road- The applicant shall participate in their pro-rate share of either 1) The right-of-way acquisition, design, and installation a second southbound through lane, second southbound right-turn lane, and an eastbound right turn overlap signal phase concurrent with the northbound left turn; or (2) The extension of Buckley Road to the Los Osos Valley Road interchange (LOVR Bypass). This project is not currently in the City’s Circulation Element and is not contained in any impact fee programs established by the City or County. It is cumulative in nature and the City shall add this project into the TIF or AASP if the Circulation Element Update identifies it as an appropriate infrastructure improvement. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-5f Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road - Mitigation measure T-3a would also mitigate this cumulative impact. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of Phase 1 buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-5g Broad Street and Tank Farm Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, , the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a northbound right turn lane, a southbound right turn overlap phase concurrent with the eastbound left, and conversion of the westbound right turn lane to a shared through right turn lane. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of each Phase of buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-5h Broad Street and Buckley Road - Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound through lane and a second southbound through lane. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of each Phase of buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo T-5i Broad Street and Prado Road – Prior to the occupancy of each phase of development, the Applicant shall participate in their pro-rata share of the design and installation of a second northbound left-turn lane. Inspection of modification Prior to occupancy of each Phase of buildings/ development City of San Luis Obispo 4.3 Transportation and Circulation December 2013 4.3-41 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.3.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan All mitigation measures identified for the City Development Plan would apply to the County Development Plan. See the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the City Development Plan above for a list of these measures. 4.3.9 References California Department of Transportation. 2002. Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. 2012. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. City of San Luis Obispo. 2004. Margarita Area Specific Plan. 2005. Airport Area Specific Plan. 2006. Circulation Element of the General Plan. 2007. Bicycle Transportation Plan. 2012. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. Fehr & Peers. 2007. US 101/Los Osos Valley Road Interchange PA & ED. San Luis Obispo Council of Governments. 2010. Regional Transportation Plan-Preliminary Sustainable Communities Strategy. San Luis Obispo County. 2009. San Luis Obispo Area Plan. 2011. San Luis Obispo County Code. Transportation Research Board. 2000. Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, D.C. Urbitran Associates, Inc. 2009. San Luis Obispo Transit Short Range Transit Plan. 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.4 Land Use This chapter describes existing land uses at the Project Site and in the surrounding vicinity, and identifies and assesses the adverse physical affects could result from an inconsistencies with San Luis Obispo (County) and the City of San Luis Obispo (City) land use plans, policies, and zoning. While a project may have a number of inconsistencies with applicable local plans, policies and zoning, not all of these inconsistencies result in adverse physical affects. Inconsistency with public plans creates significant impacts under CEQA only when an adverse physical effect would result from the inconsistency. This is consistent with the requirements of CEQA that state an EIR identify the potential, significant environmental effects of proposed activities (CEQA Guidelines Section 15002(a)(1)). CEQA Guidelines, Section 15125(d), state, “the EIR shall discuss any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable general plans, specific plans, and regional plans.” A preliminary consistency analysis is provided in Appendix E of the EIR. In order to assess where a policy inconsistency may result in an adverse physical effect, the analysis must draw on conclusions reached for other pertinent issue areas addressed in this EIR, including agricultural resources, aesthetics, air quality, and noise. The regulatory section in this chapter summarizes the key applicable Federal, state and local plans and policies. Additional details on the regulatory framework for this project can be found in each of the issue area sections. Appendix E also provides a more detailed list of applicable general plan, specific plan and regional plan polices. The Project entails a complex land use landscape for a couple of reasons. First, although the Project Site is within the County, it is also located within the City’s Urban Reserve Line (URL) and Urban Services Line (USL) and has been identified by the City for annexation. Second, the Project is broken into two larger phases: remediation and development. The County is responsible for the majority of the remediation phase, while the development phase would be implemented by either the County or City, depending on whether or not the Project Site is annexed into the City. In addition, the project site is located within an area that is subject the Airport Land Use Plan ALUP). This land use plan contains a number of land use policies. The analysis of impacts associated with the ALUP noise policies are discussed in Noise (Section 4.8). The impacts associated with the ALUP safety and airspace protection policies are discussed in Hazards and Hazardous Materials (Section 4.11). In addition a preliminary consistency analysis with the ALUP policies is provided in Appendix E. 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.4.1 Environmental Setting 4.4.1.1 On-Site Land Use The Tank Farm property (Project Site), including 332 acres of land as shown in Figure 4.4-1, is a predominantly vacant site, with remnants of previous use as a petroleum storage and distribution facility. In the northwestern portion of the site, referred to as the Northwest Operations area Northwest Area), three buildings, utility lines, a paved parking lot, fencing, and other ancillary facilities remain. The southern and northeastern portions of the site are essentially vacant; however, some remnants of former reservoirs that were located within these areas exist. Cattle grazing occurs on-site for the purposes of fire prevention and weed control. 4.4.1.2 Surrounding Land Use As shown in Figure 4.4-1, the Project Site is located within the upper reaches of the Los Osos Valley on a swath of land that remains as either open space or in agricultural use. This area is flanked to the west, east, and northeast by urban and suburban land uses within the City, including the areas along the highway and local road approaches from the southwest (U.S. Highway 101 and South Higuera Street) and the southeast (along Broad Street [Highway 227]). Areas immediately abutting the site still exhibit a semi-rural character, especially the lands lying to the north and south of the site. As shown in Figure 4.4-2, a variety of land uses currently surround the Project Site. Agricultural uses abut all, or portions of, each of the Project Site’s sides. The northern side of the Project Site is bounded by undeveloped land used for grazing. The northwestern side of the site abuts 32 acres of level, row crop terrain (north of Tank Farm Road). Active row crop terrain and hay- cropped land abuts the southern side of the site (near Esperanza Lane) and land used for livestock grazing also abuts the southern side of the site. The San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA) is located southeast of the site, with runways that are oriented in a northwest to southeast orientation. Areas containing developed industrial/business parks with light manufacturing, commercial office, and service uses lie to the northwest of the site (south of Meissner Lane), to the west of the site along Suburban Road (and south of Tank Farm Road), and to the southeast of the site. The Damon Garcia Sports Complex is located northeast of the site, and a mobile home park is situated east of the site (north of Tank Farm Road). The closest residential uses are the mobile home park referenced above and scattered residences within agricultural lands. 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.4-1 Project Site and Context Map Source: Google Earth Aerial Photograph, June 2009. 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.4-2 Existing Land Use Note: The figure shows existing uses of land, not formal land use designations per the City and County General Plans. Source: Envicom Corporation, August 2009; MRS 2012 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.4.2 Regulatory Setting – Applicable Land Use Plans, Policy, and Zoning The Project Site is currently within an unincorporated area of the County and as such is currently subject to applicable County planning documents. These include the County General Plan and the SLOCRA Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP). If the Project Site were annexed into the City, the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) would become the applicable plan. Each of these plans is described below; the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Policies and Procedures are also described, as these would be used in consideration of a proposed annexation. 4.4.2.1 Federal The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Design Guide, Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13A provides standards and recommendations for airport design, including guidance pertaining to land uses within the Runway Protection Zone. As part of FAA grant assurances, if an airport sponsor receives federal funds for an airport, it is required that use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport be restricted to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations (FAA 2012a). The FAA Airport Design Guide, AC 150/5200-33B, provides guidance on certain land uses that have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. It also discusses airport development projects (including airport construction, expansion, and renovation) affecting aircraft movement near hazardous wildlife attractants (FAA 2012b). The FAA Title 14 Part 77 establishes standards and notification requirements for objects affecting navigable airspace (FAA 2012c). The ALUP was prepared and adopted in accordance with this rule. 4.4.2.2 State California Business and Professions Code Section 11010 and Civil Code Sections 1102.6, 1103.4 and 1353 address buyer notification requirements for lands around airports. Any person who intends to offer subdivided lands, common interest developments and residential properties for sale or lease within an airport influence area is required to disclose that fact to the person buying the property (CC 2012). The ALUP was prepared and adopted in accordance with the ALUP Handbook, December 1993, and the California Public Utilities Code Sections 21670 to 21679.5, which include the statutes establishing the Airport Land Use Commissions that regulate airport area land planning. 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.4.2.3 Local County of San Luis Obispo General Plan In accordance with California state law, the County of San Luis Obispo has adopted a General Plan to guide development within the County. The Plan expresses the County's development goals, embodies public policy relative to the distribution of future land uses, provides a basis for local government decision making, and informs citizens, developers, and decision-makers of the ground rules pertaining to new development. The County’s General Plan consists of the following elements: Land Use Element (LUE) including a Framework for Planning, 13 Area Plans, Local Coastal Program, and Coastal Plan Policies - The LUE provides designations and descriptions of types of land use and density of dwellings-per-acre that are allowed in mapped districts or land use categories. Areas subject to flooding are included in the LUE as part of the Local Coastal Program, which implements the Coastal Act within the Coastal Zone and is certified by the California Coastal Commission; Circulation - Maps and policies for transportation routes and modes such as vehicles and transit, correlated with the Land Use Element; Housing - A plan with analysis of existing and projected housing needs, and goals, policies and programs for the preservation, improvement and development of housing; Agriculture - Separated from the Open Space Element May 11, 2010, this document focuses on wisely managing and protecting agricultural resources in San Luis Obispo County; Conservation and Open Space - A plan that seeks to conserve and protect important natural resources while balancing the needs of the natural and built environments. Adopted May 11, 2010, this Element consolidates and revises five previous elements including The Conservation Element, Historic Element, Aesthetics Element, Energy Element, and Open Space Element. This element addresses planning issues regarding: Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Energy; Mineral Resources; Open Space; Soil Resources; Visual Resources; and Water Resources Noise - An analysis of existing noise problems and projected noise levels, with policies and implementation measures to minimize exposure to excessive noise; Safety - A plan for the protection of the community from unreasonable risks associated with earthquakes, geologic hazards, flooding and fires; Offshore Energy - A plan for the location and extent of on-shore resources and facilities that would be appropriate for addressing off-shore oil development and production; 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Economic - Policies to establish a context and priorities for economic development; and Parks and Recreation - Policy guidance regarding the provision of park and recreation services, documenting the County’s existing park and recreation resources, and evaluating park and recreation needs. Individual policies within each of these elements that are applicable to the proposed Project are identified in Appendix E of this EIR, Policy Consistency Analysis. The General Plan identifies 13 land use categories and applies these categories to properties within the County. As shown on Figure 4.4-3, the Project Site currently includes designated areas for Recreation, Commercial Service, Industrial, and Agriculture land use categories. Most of the site (246.75 acres) is designated as Recreation; Industrial designations occur in the northwest corner of the site and on the east side of the site north of Tank Farm Road (43.19 acres); Commercial Service use is designated in the northeast corner of the site (16.24 acres); and the Agricultural land use category is applied to the southerly tip of the Project Site (14 acres). The General Plan also identifies combining designations, which are special overlay land use designations applied to areas with potentially hazardous conditions or significant natural resources. These designations indicate the need for more detailed Project review to avoid or minimize adverse environmental impacts, or effects of hazardous conditions on proposed projects. The Project Site includes a combining designation of Airport Review (AR) as it is subject to the Airport Land Use Plan as described in Section 4.4.2.5. In addition, a Flood Hazard combining designation covers the western and northwestern portions of the Project Site, as well as the southerly tip of the site. County of San Luis Obispo Land Use Element and Land Use Ordinance The County’s Land Use Element (LUE) provides zoning categories and descriptions. The Land Use Ordinance (LUO) implements the LUE, identifying allowable uses within each land use category and site planning and project design standards and review procedures. The policies of the LUE and the enforceable standards of the LUO work together to ensure the compatibility of uses. The LUE includes 13 area plans that refine general policies of the Framework for Planning for each community. The Project Site is located within the County’s San Luis Obispo Planning Area. The San Luis Obispo Inland Area Plan (Area Plan) identifies policies, programs, and standards that provide guidance for development specific to the planning area. The Area Plan makes the following statements with respect to the Commercial Service and Industrial categories on the Project Site: Commercial service uses can range from light industry, manufacturing, trucking, wholesaling and storage to business parks, research and development parks, and some types of offices. 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.4-3 County of San Luis Obispo County Land Use Categories Source: County of San Luis Obispo Planning Area Rural Land Use Category Map, April 20, 2009. San Luis Obispo Urban Reserve Line Land Use Category Map, April 20, 2009. 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The area is designated Industrial to accommodate uses requiring outside storage of materials or equipment that cannot easily be screened from view, and therefore are not allowed elsewhere in the planning area. Developments in this area should use site designs and dense landscaping that minimizes their visual impacts. Similar to the Commercial Service areas, this pocket of Industrial land is expected to remain under County jurisdiction with limited uses and floor areas until annexation to the City. The LUE identifies a URL and an Urban Services Line (USL), as shown in Figure 4.4-3. Lands within the URL are expected to develop with urban uses and city services. The USL indicates areas where urban services, particularly water and sewer, should be extended within a five- to ten-year period. The Project Site, with the exception of the southerly tip, falls within the URL. The entire site is within the USL. The area between the city limits and the URL is referred to in the Area Plan as the San Luis Obispo Urban Area, which includes most of the Project Site. The Area Plan provides planning principles for the San Luis Obispo Urban Area. Each of the applicable principles is identified in Appendix E, Policy Consistency Analysis. The Area Plan identifies the Airport Area within the San Luis Obispo Urban Area, encompassing land between the City of San Luis Obispo and the SLOCRA, and including the Project Site with the exception of the southerly tip. Planning for this area is reflected in the Airport Area Specific Plan, described below. San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport Land Use Plan The San Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) is required to prepare and adopt an Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) for each of the airports within its jurisdiction. The purposes of the ALUP are: To protect the long term economic viability of the SLOCRA by ensuring compatible land uses in the vicinity of the airport to the extent that lands in the airport area are not already devoted to incompatible uses; To promote the safety and well-being of the public by ensuring adoption of land use regulations which minimize exposure of persons to hazards associated with the operation of the Airport; To provide a set of policies and criteria to assist the ALUC in evaluating the compatibility of proposed local actions on the part of referring agencies with the Airport and in determining the consistency of the proposed local action with the ALUP; and To provide guidance to local agencies in presenting proposed local actions to the ALUC for review. The entire Project Site is within the Airport Land Use Planning Area addressed in the ALUP. The ALUP identifies four airport safety zones. As shown in Figure 2-4 (See Chapter 2.0, Project Description of this EIR), the Project Site includes areas within a Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) for Runway 11-29, and associated Safety Areas S-1a, S-1b, and S-1c. The southern portion of the Project Site includes areas within Safety Areas S-1b and S-1c for Runway 7-25. RPZs, also referred to as “clear zones,” are defined in the ALUP as “[a]reas immediately adjacent to the ends of each active runway, within which the level of aviation safety risk is very high and in 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR which, consequently, structures are prohibited and human activities are restricted to those which require only very low levels of occupancy.” Runway 11-29 was recently extended by approximately 500 feet towards the Project Site. This expanded the airport safety zones beyond those originally considered in the City of San Luis Obispo Airport Area Specific Plan, described below. The ALUP provides land use policies related to noise, safety, airspace protection, and over-flight issues, and sets forth allowable land uses and density limitations for development within each of the designated Safety Areas. These development limitations may be altered with density adjustments based on the adopted Airport Compatible Open Space Plan described below. Section 4.11, Hazards and Hazardous Materials provides an detailed analysis of the density of the Development for both the City and County Plans as it relates to the requirements of the ALUP. City of San Luis Obispo General Plan As stated in the General Plan, policies in the Land Use Element and the General Plan Land Use Map are consistent with other General Plan elements. The Housing Element goals, policies, and programs reflect the land use policies as they relate to residential development. The Circulation Element recognizes implications of land use policy on traffic and establishes relevant goals, policies, standards, and implementation measures that address both existing and potential circulation deficiencies. The Safety Element identifies hazards that could affect both existing and future development and the Conservation and Open Space Element addresses protection of open space amenities and resources. The Land Use Element recognizes these potential constraints on land use policy. Section 7 of the General Plan’s Land Use Element identifies policies and programs related to the Airport Area, which the proposed Project falls within. Where the policies and programs outlined in this section are general in nature, the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan takes precedence as the guiding document. However, certain General Plan policies are analyzed for consistency with the Project, including Land Use policy 1.7.5, Circulation policies 15.0.1 and 15.0.3, and COSE policies 8.6.1 and 9.2.1 (see Appendix E). City of San Luis Obispo Airport Area Specific Plan The AASP guides future growth and development within the AASP Area. The AASP Area includes approximately 1,500 acres of land south of the City of San Luis Obispo, within the unincorporated County but within the City’s URL. The AASP is consistent with, and provides an extension of, the City’s General Plan, providing more specific policies pertaining to the AASP Area. Projects proposed in the AASP are evaluated for consistency with the policies and conformance with development standards and design guidelines in the AASP, which, as previously stated, take precedence over more general policies and standards in the City’s General Plan. As such, where applicable, the AASP is the operative City planning document for this analysis. The Project Site is located within the central portion of the AASP Area and is situated within four ALUP Airport Safety Areas that restrict development of urban uses due to incompatible levels of noise and safety risks. As such, the AASP envisions that much of the Project Site could become a visual resource of open space land by allowing the City’s “greenbelt” to extend into the urban area and provide a connection to the rural landscape, while also contributing to airport 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR safety. Those portions of the Project Site that are less restricted by Airport Safety Areas or environmentally sensitive habitat have been selectively zoned for new development of urban infrastructure and services to support more productive use of the land. In addition, as discussed above, Runway 11-29 of SLOCRA was extended by approximately 500 feet towards the Project after the AASP was last revised, which has expanded the Airport Safety Areas beyond those originally considered in the AASP. Current ALUP Safety Areas are shown in Figure 2-4. The existing AASP designates land use areas within the Project Site that include 52.01 acres for Services and Manufacturing, 3 acres for Business Park, and 264.89 acres to remain Open Space, as shown in the map of City of San Luis Obispo Land Use Designations, Figure 4.4-4. Areas designated as Business Park are primarily for facilities that would be used for research and development, light manufacturing, and business services that include processing, production and airport-related services. Areas designated Service and Manufacturing are generally for storage, transportation, and wholesaling type uses, as well as certain retail sales and business services that may be less appropriate in other commercial designations. Open Space designations are intended to protect undeveloped or minimally developed land for preservation of natural resources and public safety. The AASP identifies goals and policies for future development; applicable policies are listed in Appendix E, Preliminary Policy Consistency Analysis. City of San Luis Obispo Bicycle Transportation Plan On May 15, 2007, the City adopted an update to the Bicycle Transportation Plan. The plan identifies existing and proposed bicycle paths, including an existing Class II Bikeway on Tank Farm Road within the Project Site that will be converted to a Class I Bikeway and a proposed Class II Bikeway on Santa Fe Road from Buckley Road to Prado Road. The following Bicycle Transportation Plan policies apply to the Project and are analyzed in Appendix E: Policy 1.5: All new developments/subdivisions shall be designed with bicycle use as an equal and viable option for transportation to, from, and within a development. Access shall include bicycle routes to schools serving the community, Class II bike lands (or Class I bike paths), and approved bicycle parking as referenced in the Plan’s short-term bike parking standards. Policy 1.7: Class I Bikeways shall be located outside of creek setbacks except where otherwise allowed or as provided for in the Conservation & Open Space Element. Policy 1.17: In the long-term, all arterial streets and State Highways (except U.S. Highway 101) should include Class II Bikeways. Section 4.3, Transportation and Circulation, also discusses Project-related bikeways. Airport Compatible Open Space Plan On July 21, 2004, the ALUC voted to amend the ALUP with an Airport Compatible Open Space Plan (ACOSP) to address concerns that previous amendments, adopted in 2002, were too restrictive to development, and were inconsistent with the City’s General Plan goals for housing production and job creation. 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.4-4 City of San Luis Obispo Land Use Designations Source: City of San Luis Obispo Land Use Designation Map, April 4, 2006. Airport Area Specific Plan, 2007. 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Airport Compatibility Open Space Plan (ACOS) establishes open spaces in the areas around the airport that can serve as reserve spaces (for aircraft emergency situations). By maintaining reserve spaces that keep certain land adjacent to the airport free and clear from obstruction or from buildings and uses where people congregate, the ACOS improves airport safety while allowing for more intense development of urban areas. The areas identified as reserve space in the ACOS include land that is close to the airport, in line with the main airport runway, or along an over-flight area where aircraft typically operate at lower altitudes. Identification of these areas in the ACOS plan adds airport safety to the list of reasons why these lands should not be developed. The ACOS provides the ability to make density adjustments within the ALUP, as shown in Table 4.4-1, that allow for increased development potential within specific Aviation Safety Areas defined in the plan. Such adjustments are allowable if advanced levels of planning analysis are performed. The ACOS identifies two reserve spaces within the Project Site (Airport Area 1 and Airport Area 2). Although the ACOS plan, as adopted in 2004, includes a portion of the area proposed for development within the Reserve Zone (northeast corner), the City is proposing to change the boundaries of the two reserves spaces to: (1) remove the current reserve space designation from areas proposed for development by replacing that area with additional open space acreage at a 1:1 ratio, (2) to designate all of the proposed open space as reserve space, and (3) to split the Margarita Area and Airport Area 1 reserve spaces. Figure 2-25 of this EIR shows the proposed changes to the ACOS reserve space boundaries. The proposed ACOS Amendment would be processed by the City subsequent to or concurrent with Project approval. Based on discussions with City staff, with adoption of the proposed Reserve Zone changes, and by designating the area as a Cluster Development Zone (CDZ), the Project can be developed at the proposed densities, in accordance with the requirements and density adjustments listed on Table 7 of the ALUP, consistent with the ACOS. San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission The San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) was created to help organize, manage, and regulate the provision of public services for development in San Luis Obispo County. LAFCO has approval authority on proposals concerning the formation of cities and special districts and other changes of jurisdiction or organization of local government agencies, including annexations. Its objectives are to encourage the orderly formation of local governmental agencies, preserve agricultural land resources, and discourage urban sprawl. In making decisions regarding proposals, LAFCO’s follows its Policies and Procedures Guide. Applicable policies from this Guide are identified in Appendix E. 4.4.3 Significance Criteria Based on the State CEQA Guidelines (Appendix G), the Project would result in a significant impact if it would: Physically divide an established community; 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan; Be potentially incompatible with surrounding land uses; or Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. By placing commercial development within a largely undeveloped area of the URL, the Project would not be physically dividing an established community; therefore, this threshold will not be addressed further in this analysis. The Project is not within or adjacent to any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan; therefore, this threshold will not be addressed further in this analysis. Impacts associated with the last two thresholds are discussed in the remaining parts of this section. For these two thresholds only conflicts and inconsistencies that would result in adverse physical affects are discussed consistent with the requirements of CEQA (CEQA Guidelines Section 15002 (a)(1)). 4.4.4 Remediation Project Analysis The Remediation Phase of the project would involve excavating and capping various areas of the Project Site along with the implementation of monitoring and institutional controls. This phase would also include restoration activities. A number of potential inconsistencies with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation have been identified that could result in an adverse physical effect. These potential adverse physical effects are discussed below. Restoration and Preservation of Degraded Lands The Remediation Project would be considered to have a beneficial impact with regard to policies related to restoration of degraded lands or habitat since it would provide for the restoration, preservation, or mitigation actions called for in these land use policies. Specifically, the Project would preserve 75 percent of the property as Open Space that would include uplands and restored wetland areas, and would create a continuous wildlife corridor across the site from north to south (only interrupted by Tank Farm Road). The Project would create additional wetlands at the Project Site that would support various listed species. Further, approximately 15 acres would be used for recreational purposes, such as ball fields. Remediation activities will impact approximately 26 acres of waters of the United States, which includes wetland and Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (VPFS) habitat. The proposed restoration activities would impact an additional 11 acres of waters of the United States. To offset this impact and to improve flood control at the site, the Applicant is proposing to restore/create about 56 acres of wetlands. This would increase the amount of wetland at the Project Site by about 19 acres. All of this increase would occur within the runway safety zones for the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA). This increase in wetland area and quality would have the 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR potential to increase the local bird population associated with wetlands. This increase in local bird populations within the runway protection zones could significantly increase the bird strike hazards for aircraft taking off and landing at the SLOCRA, which could be inconsistent with a number of policies as discussed in Appendix E. This impact on adjacent land uses was found to be significant and unavoidable (Class I) in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials Section (see Impact HM.4 in Section 4.11. The project could potentially be inconsistent with several polices related to hazards and land use compatibility as discussed in Appendix E. Air Quality Activities associated with the remediation construction would generate emissions due to construction equipment engines, soil disturbance, fugitive dust, pipeline removal, worker vehicles, and delivery of materials and equipment. Some of these emissions would exceed the thresholds established by the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District SLOAPCD). Mitigation measures that are discussed in the Air Quality Section (Section 4.1) would reduce the construction emissions to below the SLOAPCD thresholds. The impacts associated with construction emissions would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). This impact is discussed further in Section 4.1, impact AQ.2. With the mitigation the project could potentially be consistent with several polices related to air quality as discussed in Appendix E. The SLOAPCD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) includes implementing control measures and strategies to attain state and federal ambient air quality standards. The SLOAPCD then implements these control measures as regulations to control or reduce criteria pollutant emissions from stationary sources or equipment. A project is deemed inconsistent with the AQMP if it results in population or employment growth that exceeds growth estimates in that AQMP. Projects that do not involve growth-inducing impacts or exceed local or regional population or growth projections are generally considered consistent with the AQMP. The proposed Project is not expected to result in population growth and, therefore, would comply with the goals of the AQMP. Noise and Vibration Noise would be generated by construction equipment operating at different times during the remediation phase of the Project. The peak activities that could produce the peak off-site noise levels would be associated with remediation activities on the east end of the Project Site, such as activities at Reservoir 4 and the Flower Mound, both of which could be occurring simultaneously. A mobile home park is located immediately east of these areas, which would constitute residential receptors. Activities at these locations would include grading, removal of soils from the Reservoir 4 and Flower Mound borrow area, crushing operations at the Flower Mound area to produce gravel to be used at other locations of the Project Site, and blasting activities at the Flower Mound area to break up rocks that would be used in the crushing plant to produce gravel. For the short-term, mobile criteria, the noise levels generated by the remediation activities would be less than the threshold. However, the crushing activities would generate noise levels above the longer-term, stationary equipment thresholds. 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation measures that are discussed in the Noise and Vibration Section (Section 4.8) would reduce the noise levels of the crushing activities to below the threshold, which would make this a less than significant impact with mitigation (Class II). This impact is discussed further in Section 4.8 (Impact N.1). With the mitigation, the Project could potentially be consistent with the applicable noise polices as discussed in Appendix E. Construction activities could increase ground vibration and create annoyance for humans. The blasting activities at the Flower Mound could produce the highest vibration levels. Vibrations associated with setup, crushing, blasting, and removing equipment would vary over time. The actual peak vibration levels during these periods would only last for a few minutes, and these periods would be rare and relatively short-lived. Mitigation measures that are discussed in the Noise and Vibration Section (Section 4.8) would reduce the vibration levels of the blasting and crushing activities to less than significant, which would make this a less than significant impact with mitigation (Class II). This impact is discussed further in Section 4.8 (Impact N.1 and Impact N.2). With the mitigation, the Project could potentially be consistent with the applicable noise/vibration polices as discussed in Appendix E. Truck vibrations from the proposed Project along area roadways would be substantially less than those anticipated from freeway traffic speeds and would therefore have less than significant impacts on residences and historical buildings. 4.4.5 City Development Plan Analysis The City Development Plan component of the Project would develop the site, if annexed, over a 25-year span in five phases that would ultimately place 803,000 sq. ft. of floor space for Business Park and Service-Commercial uses. Additionally, this development would provide 15 acres to be developed for active recreation, and preserve approximately 250 acres as open space. As part of the City Development Plan, 6.06 acres of the site would be dedicated for widening Tank Farm Road. A number of potential inconsistencies with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation have been identified that could result in an adverse physical effect. These potential adverse physical effects are discussed below. Aesthetics and Visual Resources The City Development Plan would change the character of the site from a semi-rural setting to a semi-urban developed setting. Substantial design standards are contained in the City’s AASP and the City’s General Plan, including the preservation of open space, hills, and development design standards, would limit the impact on the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings. The impacts of the Project on visual quality are discussed further in Section 4.10, Impact AE.2. Implementation of AASP design standards and the proposed preservation of a large amount of open space (75% of the Project Site would remain as Open Space), the impacts to visual character on adjacent lands would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). With this mitigation, the Project could potentially be consistent with the applicable visual quality polices as discussed in Appendix E. 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City Development Plan and associated urban uses would result in an increase in nighttime light and glare within the area. These increases would be the result of new lighting at service commercial, business park, and public facility uses. Development of these aspects of the Project would increase the amount of light and glare due to additional parking lots, building and ball field lights, and streetlights. Mitigation measures that are discussed in Section 4.10, Impact AE.3 would reduce the nighttime light and glare impacts to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). This impact is discussed further in Section 4.10 (Impact AE.3). With the mitigation, the Project could potentially be consistent with the applicable nighttime light and glare polices as discussed in Appendix E. Noise Noise would be generated by a number of different construction equipment operating at different times during the construction of the City Development Plan component of the Project. The peak activities that could produce the peak offsite noise levels would be associated with activities on the east end of the Project Site, such as activities during Phase 1 located immediately west of the Mobile Home park. Activities at these locations would include minor grading, building construction, and paving activities. None of the construction activities would generate noise levels above the significance threshold of 75 dBA during daytime hours. However, these noise thresholds could be exceeded if the construction equipment is not properly maintained or is operated during hours that are outside of the allowable hours in the Municipal Code. Mitigation measures that are discussed in the Noise and Vibration Section (Section 4.8) would reduce construction noise levels to less than significant, which would make this a less than significant impact with mitigation (Class II). This impact is discussed further in Section 4.8 Impact N.1 and Impact N.3). With the mitigation, the Project could potentially be consistent with the applicable noise polices as discussed in Appendix E. The Airport Land Use Plan requires mitigation for projects that propose development within the noise contours associated with the airport operations. Some portions of the Project would be potentially placed within these noise contours, specifically development areas on the south- eastern area (Phase 5, within the 75 dBA contour), the eastern areas immediately north of Tank Farm Road (within the 65 DBA contour), and the western areas (within the 65 DBA contour). Development within these areas, including offices, hotels, and restaurants, may require additional attenuation built into the construction design in order to ensure that indoor noise levels are below the Airport Land Use Plan standards. Failure to address these issues would result in a significant impact. However, mitigation measure discussed for Impact N.5 in the Noise Section Section 4.8) would make this impact less than significant with mitigation (Class II). With the mitigation, the Project could potentially be consistent with the applicable ALUP noise polices as discussed in Appendix E. Air Quality Diesel particulate and fugitive dust emissions mainly from vehicles associated with the operation of the development would exceed the air quality thresholds established by the SLOABCD. Mitigation measures that are discussed in the Air Quality Section (Section 4.1, Impact AQ.7) would reduce diesel particulate and fugitive dust emissions, but they would still remain above the thresholds, and as such, the impact would be significant and unavoidable (Class I). This 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR impact is discussed further in Section 4.1, impact AQ.7. The project could potentially be inconsistent with several polices related to air quality as discussed in Appendix E. Traffic and Circulation Some of the Class I bike path alignments shown in the Bicycle Transportation Plan would be modified. For example, the path shown crossing the Project Site from north to south in the Bike Plan is proposed to go around the northwestern perimeter of the Project Site. Similarly, the bike path along San Luis Creek follows the Project boundary west rather than following the creek as planned. This would be inconsistent with the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan. Implementation of mitigation measure T.3a the Project could be consistent with the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan. 4.4.6 County Development Plan Analysis Impacts from the County Development Plan would be the same as the impacts from the City Development Plan as the phasing, construction requirements, and land use mix would be the same. The differences between the two projects would be that the business park and service commercial developments would be located on slightly smaller acreages (but with the same square footages), and there would be the construction and operation of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) as part of the County Development Plan. The County Development Plan component of the Project would develop the site, if not annexed by the City, over a 25-year span in five phases that would ultimately place 803,000 sq. ft. of floor space designated for Commercial Service, and Industrial uses. Additionally, this development would provide approximately one acre for an on-site wastewater treatment plant, space for an active recreation facility, and preserve approximately 250 acres as open space. As part of the County Project, 6.06 acres of the site would be dedicated for widening Tank Farm Road. A number of potential inconsistencies with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation have been identified that could result in an adverse physical effect. These potential adverse physical effects are discussed below. Noise Pump noise associated with the WWTP could produce noise levels above the nighttime significance thresholds at nearby residential receptors. Depending on the pump type and configuration, pump noise could produce noise levels in excess of 50 dBA at the Mobile Home Park residential area. Mitigation measures that are discussed in the Noise and Vibration Section Section 4.8) would reduce construction noise levels to less than significant, which would make this a less than significant impact with mitigation (Class II). This impact is discussed further in Section 4.8 (Impact N.6). With the mitigation, the Project could potentially be consistent with the applicable noise polices as discussed in Appendix E. Odors The WWTP has the potential to cause an odor nuisance to surrounding land uses. The screening threshold for this impact is one mile from the source. A distance of one mile from the proposed WWTP would encompass all of the areas associated with the proposed Development Project as well as numerous residential and business communities along Broad Street and Tank Farm Road 4.4 Land Use December 2013 4.4-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR east of Broad Street. Mitigation measures that are discussed in the Air Quality Section (Section 4.1, Impact AQ.11) would reduce the odor impacts, to less than significant (Class II). This impact is discussed further in Section 4.1, impact AQ.11. With implementation of the mitigation measures the project could potentially be consistent with several polices related to odor as discussed in Appendix E. 4.4.7 Cumulative Analysis Consistency of proposed City and County Development Plans with applicable plans and policies are assessed on a project-by-project basis. The Project would be consistent with the Project Site’s land use designation and zoning as well as applicable policy. As such, the Project, in combination with other projects planned in the area, is not expected to result in significant cumulative impacts, with respect to consistency with land use plans and policy. Therefore, cumulative land use and planning impacts associated with policy consistency are considered less than significant (Class III). 4.4.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan A mitigation summary/monitoring plan is not included in this section because the mitigation measures that were used to address land use impacts are outlined in other issue areas. See the specific issue area sections for the applicable mitigation monitoring plans. 4.4.9 References Airport Land Use Commission of San Luis Obispo County. 2005. Airport Land Use Plan for the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport. May 18, 2005. Avocet Environmental, Inc. (Avocet) 2007. Remedial Action Plan. December 18, 2007. California Code (CC). 2012. Business and Professions Code and Civil Code. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html. Accessed on November 2, 2012. Chevron Environmental Management Company. 2007. Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Re-Development Project. December 20, 2007. San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission. 2008. Policies and Procedures, Updated November 2008. City of San Luis Obispo. 2005. Airport Compatible Open Space Plan. February 2005. 2005. Airport Area Specific Plan. August 2005. County of San Luis Obispo. 1992. General Plan - Noise Element. May 5, 1992. 1995. General Plan - Energy Element. April 25, 1995. 1995. General Plan - Agriculture and Open Space Element. December 15, 1995. 1999. General Plan - Safety Element. December 1999. 4.4 Land Use Chevron Tank Farm 4.4-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2006. General Plan - Parks and Recreation Element. December 19, 2006. 2007. General Plan - San Luis Obispo Area Plan. Revised January 2007. 2008. Title 22 - Land Use Ordinance – Title 22 of the County Code. December 2008. 2009. General Plan - Framework for Planning (Inland). Revised May 2009. 2009. General Plan - Housing Element. June 2009. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 2012a. Airport Design Guide, Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13A. September 28, 2012. http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/airport_design/. Accessed on November 2, 2012. 2012b. Airport Design Guide, Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5200-33B. August 28, 2007. http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.current/doc umentNumber/150_5200-33. Accessed on November 2, 2012. 2012c. Notification of Proposed Construction or Alteration on Airport Part 77. http://www.faa.gov/airports/central/engineering/part77/. Accessed on December 19, 2012. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.5 Water Resources This section addresses the potential Project impacts on: (1) water quality standards, (2) surface water quality due to discharges, (3) any change of groundwater quality, (4) the quantity or movement in the availability of surface or groundwater, and (5) community water services. For each subtopic, existing conditions, thresholds of significance, impacts, and mitigation measures are addressed. The proposed Project involves two principal phases. The first is a remediation and restoration phase, which addresses soil and groundwater contamination due to existing petroleum-related contamination. This phase will include the demolition of existing buildings, excavation of contaminated soil, capping of contaminated areas, site recontouring, and revegetation. Overall, the completion of the remediation activities is intended to reduce ecological risk, improve the function and value of the various on-site wetlands, improve groundwater recharge, increase nutrient and pollution removal, and provide increased flood-flow management. The remediation and restoration activities, however, will result in surface disturbances across the Project Site, potentially impacting surface water quality, groundwater quality, and hydrologic characteristics of the site. Any recontouring of the Project Site could impact water flow and tributary characteristics. In addition, the placement of caps over areas of contamination at various locations could potentially affect infiltration rates and alter runoff volumes. The second component of the Project involves developing portions of the site through entitlements for commercial and industrial land uses. The Applicant’s goal is to develop a portion of the Project Site with approximately 800,000 square feet of commercial and industrial development. Approximately 51 acres of the 332-acre site are proposed for development. The remaining portion of the Project Site is intended to be dedicated as open space. As part of the second component, the Applicant has proposed two development options. The first would be development in the City of San Luis Obispo. Under this option, once remediation is complete the property would be annexed into the City for development. The second development option would be in the County of San Luis Obispo. Construction activities occurring as part of the development phase have the potential to impact surface water quality, groundwater quality, and groundwater quantity. The completed development could potentially impact water quality and quantity. Under the County Development Plan, existing on-site groundwater wells would supply water for the Project. The additional water demand for the Project has potential impacts to the groundwater availability. With the County Development Plan, wastewater from the development would be treated at an on-site wastewater treatment plant. Section 4.6 discusses the wastewater impacts. Under the City Development Plan, the proposed development area would be annexed into the City of San Luis Obispo and would be served by the City by extending the existing water service utilities. Impacts associated with supplying the Project from the existing City water service utility is discussed in Section 4.13, Public Services and Utilities. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Under the City Development Plan, wastewater from the Project would be handled by the existing City wastewater system. Impacts associated with the use of the City wastewater system are discussed in Section 4.6, Wastewater. The completed development also has the potential to impact on-site hydrology, surface water, and groundwater quality. Due to the increase in impervious area from the development, stormwater runoff could increase. The development also has the potential to impact surface and groundwater quality due to pollutant transportation from parking lots, building roofs, pesticides, and fertilizers. This section analyzes any potential water impacts due to the completed development. 4.5.1 Environmental Setting 4.5.1.1 Physical Setting The Project Site is within the unincorporated area of San Luis Obispo County south of the San Luis Obispo city limits along Tank Farm Road. The tank farm, constructed in 1910, was used as an accumulation point for petroleum pipelines from the San Joaquin Valley. The property slowly withdrew from operation and by the late 1990s the site was fully decommissioned. Currently the site is mostly undeveloped and consists of both native and non-native grasslands, but is dominated by non-native annual grasslands. The site also contains both natural wetlands and wetlands from water accumulation within the former oil storage facilities. Cattle currently graze the open space for fire prevention and weed control. Urban developments within the City of San Luis Obispo and the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport surround the Project Site. The 332-acre Project Site drains from north to south. Natural slopes ascend to the north and northeast at gradients up to 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). Total relief across the Project Site is approximately 40 feet. Current adjacent land use is mainly undeveloped open space. 4.5.1.2 Surface Waters The entire Project Site is contained within the San Luis Obispo Creek watershed as shown in Figure 4.5-1. The creek starts in the foothills of the Lopez Mountains and discharges to the Pacific Ocean at Avila Beach. Its course is approximately 1,500 feet from the tank farm site at its closest point. The tank farm itself lies across or adjacent to tributaries to San Luis Obispo Creek. This is relevant since the site lies within the special management zone that the City of San Luis Obispo and San Luis Obispo County have established for managing San Luis Obispo Creek. The Project Site has three primary watersheds/catchments as shown in Figure 4.5-2. The areas shown in Figure 4.5-2 are the watershed/catchment areas that have the potential to affect the Project Site. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.5-1 SLO Valley Watersheds and Groundwater Basin Source: Adapted from DWR 2013 and SLOWS 2007. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.5-2 Overview of the Watersheds that Relate to the Chevron Tank Farm Property Site Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) 2.5’x8’ BOX CULVERT (new) 3.5’X7’ BOX CULVERT (new) 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The first is Tank Farm Creek (Watershed A in Figure 4.5-2); the second is the small portion of the site tributary to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek (Watershed B in Figure 4.5-2), and the third is the collection of isolated depressions and basins created during the historical petroleum storage operations (Watershed C in Figure 4.5-2). A small portion of the site along the east property line (Watershed D in Figure 4.5-2) drains via sheet flow onto the adjoining property. Other minor catchments formed by the berm along the southeast property line account for the remainder of the site area. Tank Farm Creek Tank Farm Creek is an approximately two-mile long tributary of the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek, which is, in turn, a tributary to San Luis Obispo Creek. Tank Farm Creek splits into two separate reaches on-site (East Fork and West Fork), north of Tank Farm Road (see Figure 4.5-2). The West Fork of Tank Farm Creek extends almost due north and is, for the most part, channelized and serves both urban and natural catchments. The East Fork of Tank Farm Creek is a southwest trending reach that begins in the South Street Hills that border Broad Street. Approximately 4,000 feet of Tank Farm Creek, slightly more than 30 percent of its total length, is upstream of the discharge point and is fed by a total runoff area of approximately 628 acres. This is the principal watershed for the Project. One hundred fifty acres of the watershed are on- site, while the remaining 478 acres are located off-site. The highest and lowest points of the watershed are at 592 feet above mean sea level (amsl) and 113 feet amsl, respectively. This is an overall slope of 6 percent. However, on-site the watershed is relatively flat with a slope of only 0.3 percent. It is estimated that 13 percent of the watershed is urban and relatively impervious. Unpaved areas are characterized by pasture or naturally vegetated ground consisting of sands, silts, and clays. Tank Farm Creek runs along the western property boundary in a channel and passes beneath Tank Farm Road via two 48-inch-diameter steel culverts (hydraulic design point DP-4 in Figure 4.5-2). Tank Farm Creek discharges from the Project Site at a headwall – a retaining wall designed to provide retention for a culvert or drainage ditch – that is located near the southwest corner of the site (hydraulic design point DP-6 in Figure 4.5-2). The headwall has two 36-inch- diameter gate valves that were constructed as part of the petroleum storage operation, to provide a means of retaining a catastrophic release of oil on-site. The property downstream of the headwall (property not owned by the Applicant) has been filled to the top of the headwall, closing off one of the 36-inch-diameter gate valves. This has the practical effect of halving the discharge capacity of Tank Farm Creek at this location, which increases the likelihood of local flooding in this area. Hydraulic changes to the system are discussed in Section 4.5.4, within the Impact WR.5 analysis. A secondary channel joins Tank Farm Creek just upstream of the headwall. It drains approximately 55.2 acres. This secondary channel passes under Tank Farm Road via two 4-foot- high by 6-foot-wide (48 square feet total flow area) box culverts (hydraulic design point DP-5 in Figure 4.5-2). Although the topography north of Tank Farm Road is flat, the relatively low invert elevation of the box culverts prevents the structure from effectively decreasing peak stormwater flows. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR At the eastern point of the operations area Tank Farm Creek splits into its east and west forks see Figure 4.5-2). Following the forks upstream, the West Fork runs nearly due north, while the East Fork branches to the northeast. The on-site configuration of the forks has been altered from the pre-development past through the use of berms and containment structures that were used to minimize the migration of petroleum spills. The East Fork drains an area of approximately 169 acres. This portion of the Tank Farm Creek Watershed is almost entirely overland flow; only 0.6 acre (0.4 percent) is paved. In the lower part of the basin, the slope is relatively flat and consists of a greater proportion of silt or clay soils. Just north of the Project Site two new box culverts were installed under Prado Road as part of a recent road extension project. In addition, the two existing box culverts were extended to the south. In addition, a new retention basin was constructed just south of Prado Road and north of the Project Site. The West Fork drains approximately 336 acres. From its branch off the Tank Farm Creek to the point where it enters the site along the north property line, the West Fork follows a poorly defined channel that has a slope of just 0.4 percent and only 4 feet of relief. As part of a hydraulic study that was conducted for the Project (See Appendix F) existing site conditions were evaluated for a 24-hour storm with recurrence intervals of 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100 years. The key design points (DP) and pond features considered in the existing conditions analysis are shown in Figure 4.5-2. DP-1 is where the West Fork of Tank Farm Creek enters the SLO Tank Farm along the north property line. DP-2 is where the East Fork and the reach that drains former Reservoir 4. DP-4 and DP-5 represent the two 48-inch diameter round culverts and the two 4-foot by 6-foot box culverts, respectively that cross under Tank Farm Road. DP-6 is the discharge point through the headwall for Tank Farm Creek. Table 4.5-1 provides the peak flow from the design points shown in Figure 4.5-2. Table 4.5-2 summarizes the peak flows and volumes for the off-site discharge from the Tank Farm Creek Watershed. Table 4.5-1 Summary Of Peak Surface Water Flows – Existing Conditions Design Point Peak Flow (cubic feet per second) 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year DP-1 214.7 432.0 548.1 623.0 690.7 DP-2 39.1 85.0 111.9 130.9 149.9 DP-3 57.8 135.9 182.4 216.0 249.8 DP-4 114.6 255.8 324.8 377.6 433.4 DP-5 72.4 205.7 286.8 340.6 395.5 DP-6 57.8 77.7 83.3 84.2 85.2 DP-7 0.4 2.1 3.2 4.0 4.8 DP-8 3.5 7.8 10.4 12.2 14 Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) (see Appendix F). 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.5-2 Summary Of Peak Flows and Volumes for Tank Farm Creek Off-site Discharge - Existing Conditions Storm Event Volumes (ac-ft) Peak Flow(1) (cfs) Existing 36" Discharge Storage Overflow Total Existing 36" Discharge Overflow Total 2-Year 24-Hour Storm 40.4 27.2 0.0 67.6 57.8 0.0 57.8 10-Year 24-Hour Storm 72.1 71.1 0.0 143.2 77.7 0.0 77.7 25-Year 24-hour Storm 92.1 92.3 4.7 189.2 83.3 79.2 162.5 50-Year 24-hour Storm 95.9 98.4 28.3 222.5 84.2 166.1 250.2 100-Yer 24-hour Storm 97.1 103.3 56.2 256.5 85.2 287.2 372.5 ac-ft – acre-feet cfs – cubic feet per second Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) (see Appendix F). A review of the tables and the information provided in Appendix F shows that the existing stormwater management infrastructure is inadequate for storms exceeding the 10-year recurrence interval (4.7 inches in a 24-hour period). The majority of stormwater is routed directly to the headwall (DP-6 in Figure 4.5-2) to discharge off site. Consequently, the limited storage capacity south of Tank Farm Road is quickly exceeded, and the substantially greater storage capacity north of Tank Farm Road is never mobilized. This issue is addressed in Section 4.5.4, Impact WR.5. Tributary to East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek The Project Site also contains approximately 19 acres that discharge directly to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed B in Figure 4.5-2. The tributary area is in the southeast portion of the Project Site. It includes an old meander of the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and is connected to the active channel by a12-inch-diameter gate valve that appears to have rusted open. DP-7 in Figure 4.5-2 shows the location of the discharge point. It is estimated that peak discharge from the gate valve (Design Point DP-7) ranges between 0.4 and 4.8 cubic feet per second for the 2-year and 100-year storms, respectively (See Table 4.5.1, DP-7). The proposed Project would not involve any development in this area. This watershed area contains an auxiliary channel and an oxbow (U-shaped channel) that were cut-off from the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek by construction of a containment berm along the southeast property line. On-site Hydraulically Isolated Depressions From 1910 until the early 1980s, the tank farm was used for storing crude oil transported via pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. Although the site no longer handles petroleum, the remnants of that use are still found across the site. The most prominent features are the vestiges of the former storage facilities. There were six large earthen reservoirs ranging in capacity between 775,000 and 1,350,000 barrels. The reservoirs were constructed by excavating a circular 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR or elliptical depression, which was then lined with wire-mesh-reinforced concrete. The walls were also reinforced concrete but were variously constructed either vertically or integrated into the sloping sides of the depression. All but one of these reservoirs is located south of Tank Farm Road. Figure 2-2 shows the location of these reservoirs. In addition, 21 steel aboveground storage tanks, capable of holding 55,000 barrels of oil each, were located north of Tank Farm Road. Their historical locations are also shown in Figure 2-2. On April 7, 1926, a series of lightning strikes resulted in a massive fire at the tank farm. By April 11, 1926, all but a few thousand barrels in inventory had been burned to coke or spread across the site. Following the 1926 fire, four large reservoirs were repaired and continued in service for several more decades. Ten of the aboveground storage tanks were rebuilt and used through the 1980s. The last aboveground storage tank, which was used most recently to store fire water, was removed from the site in August 2000. The reconstruction effort included expanding fire breaks and enlarging the containment areas surrounding the reservoirs and aboveground storage tanks. This created numerous hydraulically closed depressions across the site, many of which became wetlands and habitat for environmentally protected species. Today there are about 23 hydraulically isolated depressions at the site that cover about 140 acres. The location and size of each of the depressions is shown in Figure 4.5-3. These depressions have no hydrologic connection to either Tank Farm Creek or the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. In effect, changes in storage occur only from direct precipitation, evapotranspiration, or infiltration. Except under extraordinary circumstances there is no runon or runoff associated with these depressions. Other Minor Watersheds Minor watersheds are those catchments at the site that are relatively small, and do not possess clearly defined channels. There are two minor watersheds on the site. The first includes approximately 11 acres of berm slope that drains into Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. This area is negligible with respect to the overall watershed and is not changed by either remediation and restoration or development, and is not discussed further in this document. The second minor watershed is referred to as Watershed D in Figure 4.5-2. Approximately 11 acres of the site drains east via sheet flow to the adjacent property. Peak runoff flow rates range from 3.5 cubic feet per second for the 2-year storm up to 14 cubic feet per second for the 100- year storm. Total runoff volume is estimated to be between 0.4 and 1.5 acre-feet for the 2- year and 100-year storms, respectively. 100-Year Flood Plain A 100-year floodplain analysis was performed as part of the Hydrology Study for the proposed Project (see Appendix F). Figure 4.5-4 shows cross section locations used in the analysis and the estimated lateral extent of the flood plain. The cross sections developed for the analysis and the computer-generated results are provided in Appendix F. The entire flood plain within the property boundary occupies approximately 57 acres. At the northern property boundary, the flood stage is at an approximate elevation of 122.8 feet above mean sea level (amsl). 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.5-3 On-site Isolated Catchments Existing Conditions Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.5-4 100-Year Flood Plain Existing Conditions Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR At Tank Farm Road, it is estimated that the flood stage is at 120.2 feet amsl, and at the headwall, the flood stage has decreased to an estimated 119.5 feet amsl. North of Tank Farm Road, it appears that the flood stays within the limits of the Project Site boundary. South of Tank Farm Road, the flood stage is nominally within the property boundary. However, the hydrology analysis also shows that about 56 acre-feet of water overtop the headwall during a 100-year storm. Surface Water Quality Surface water from the site has been monitored and sampled on a periodic basis since about 1998 at various locations on the Project Site. There have been oil sheens and/or oil droplets sometime observed in Reservoirs 3, 5, and 7. Surface water samples have been chemically analyzed for the presence of various hydrocarbons that could be associated with the oil contamination at the Project Site. Surface water samples are chemically analyzed for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) in the C10 to C40 carbon range characterized as crude oil. During some of the past sampling, tests were done for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (collectively known as BTEX), and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PHAs). Testing for these compounds stopped in 2002 since all of the readings had been below the detection limit of 0.0005 parts per million (ppm). TPH levels have for the most part been below the State of California Maximum Containment Level of 1 ppm TPH, with the majority of the surface water samples have had TPH below 0.1 ppm. During the 2011 sampling, the maximum TPH concentration was found to be approximately 0.5 ppm. Additional information on surface water quality can be found in Appendix H.1, Attachment 5. 4.5.1.3 Groundwater The San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin underlies the San Luis and Edna Valleys and is bound on the northeast by the Santa Lucia Range and on the southwest by the San Luis Range. Figure 4.5-1 shows the location of the San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin in relation to the Project Site. The groundwater basin is an elongated trough of relatively recent (Pleistocene and Holocene age) sediments approximately 13 miles long and 2 miles wide. It is recharged primarily by streams flowing from the northeast. This basin, as described in the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Bulletin 118 report (published 2/27/2004), includes two areas separated by a groundwater divide- the San Luis Obispo Creek valley (San Luis) area and the Pismo Creek valley (Edna) area. The proposed Project is in the San Luis area. These basin areas have distinct groundwater recharge and production characteristics and are considered sub- basins in the draft San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report (SLOC 2012). The San Luis portion of the San Luis Obispo Valley groundwater basin is comprised of shallow alluvial sediments and deeper marine sedimentary beds that have been deposited in the San Luis Obispo Creek valley. The basin area has formed as a result of tectonic activity that has uplifted the Irish Hills and down-dropped the valley floor. As a result, the basin sediments increase in thickness toward the southwest where the deeper deposits butt against the Los Osos Valley fault. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The most recent estimates of groundwater in storage and average annual recharge were made by DWR in 1997. Groundwater in storage within the San Luis area was estimated at 16,300 acre- feet. Average annual recharge to the San Luis area was estimated at 2,200 acre-feet per year. Recharge varies depending on available storage for recharge waters. During periods where groundwater levels are low, more recharge can occur. Recharge is comprised of percolation of rainfall, percolation of stream flow, and irrigation return flows and wastewater discharge percolation. The City of San Luis Obispo discharges their wastewater to San Luis Obispo Creek near the downstream edge of the main groundwater basin area and would also be a recharge source. Groundwater levels have been monitored in the vicinity of the Project for over 50 years and at the Project Site for more than 10 years. Figure 4.5-5 shows the Project area groundwater contour map from October 2011. The groundwater contour map shows that the groundwater surface slopes to the southwest. The critical years to document water levels are in the driest years on record when the heaviest pumping was occurring. Prior to the "miracle March" of 1991, the water levels were at their lowest levels in late 1990 and early 1991. Groundwater generally flows from east to west at a gradient of 0.006 foot drop per foot distance. The water level elevation on the east side of the tank farm was at 132 feet amsl and at 102 feet amsl in the southwest corner of the Project Site in February 1991 (Cleath 2002). The 2003 groundwater pumpage in the San Luis area was estimated at 390 acre-feet. Agricultural water use in the San Luis area of the groundwater basin east of San Luis Obispo Creek is estimated to be about 230 acre-feet per year (Cleath-Harris 2011). The City’s groundwater extractions began in the late 1980’s, peaked at about 2,000 acre-feet in 1990 and declined to about 100-150 acre-feet per year (AFY) in the mid-1990’s and has remained at about the same amount since that time. The City wells that produce water from the basin include one well on Prado Road for construction water, one potable well near Los Osos Valley Road and Froom Ranch Road, and one potable well located at Fire Station #4 at the corner of Los Osos Valley Road and Madonna Road, and two wells at the City’s Laguna Lake Golf Course used for irrigation. Based on the documented figures for groundwater extractions, current total groundwater extractions in the San Luis area are estimated to be in the range of 1,000-1,200 AFY (Cleath- Harris 2011). Groundwater extractions are significantly less than the safe yield for the basin area, whether it be the DWR estimate of 2,000 AFY (Bulletin 18, 1958), the DWR estimate of 2,000- 2,500 AFY (unpublished findings, 1997), or the Boyle Engineering (1991) estimate of 3,650 AFY for average annual recharge to the basin. The current office buildings on the Project Site (in the Northwest Operations Area) use a 140- foot deep well to provide non-potable water to the office buildings (see Figure 4.5-5). The current water use for the office buildings is about one acre-foot per year. Approximately 0.67 AFY of water from the well is used for cattle watering on the Project Site. Allowing for some additional water use on the Project Site related to industrial activities, groundwater extractions are estimated at about 2 AFY. The well currently serving the Project Site (within the Northwest Operations Area) would not be used for the City or County Development Plan components of the Project. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.5-5 Project Site Groundwater Elevation Contours and Well Locations Source: Cleath-Harris 2011; MRS 2013. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Applicant also has four other groundwater wells that would be used for the Remediation and Restoration and County Development Plan components of the Project. Figure 4.5-5 shows the location of these wells. The City Development Plan component of the Project would utilize water provided by the City Utilities Department, and the existing groundwater wells would not be used. Once remediation was completed, the three wells located on the Project Site would be plugged and abandoned. A forth well is owned by another property owner, but Chevron has rights to use the water from this well. Petroleum hydrocarbons released during historical site operations between 1910 and the early 1980s, and a fire in 1926 has impacted groundwater at the Project Site. The Project Site contains a network of 30 shallow groundwater wells that have been used to monitor hydrocarbon contamination levels in the shallow groundwater. In addition, there are four deep groundwater wells that have been tested for the presence of hydrocarbons. Groundwater samples are chemically analyzed for the presence of TPH in the C10 to C40 carbon range characterized as crude oil, in the C4 to C10 carbon range characterized as gasoline, and tests are also done for BETX. TPH levels have for the most part been below the State of California Maximum Containment Level of 1 ppm TPH; however, some of the shallow wells have had TPH-Crude levels as high as 10 ppm. TPH-Gasoline levels have been lower than TPH-Crude, typically averaging less than 0.05 ppm; however, some of the wells have had TPH-Gasoline levels as high as 7.0 ppm. The wells that have had the highest TPH concentrations are located near the Northwest Operations Area of the site, just north of Tank Farm Road. The four deep groundwater wells, which would be used for the remediation and restoration, and County Development Plan components of the Project, have been tested for TPH as well as a host of other water constituents. All of the wells had non-detect levels of TPH (levels were below the practical quantitation limit). The analysis of the groundwater samples showed that the water met drinking water standards (Cleath 2002). A review of the groundwater sampling results indicates that TPH and BETX contamination is limited to the shallow groundwater in close proximity to the most highly contaminated areas of the site, which would be the old operations area. The groundwater monitoring data collected from 1989 to 2003 by Unocal at the direction of the RWQCB indicated that although groundwater comes in contact with TPH in soil below the ground surface, there is no dissolved- phase TPH problem, and there is no off-site migration of contaminated groundwater (McDaniel Lambert, 2012). However, the RWQCB has indicated that dissolved phase total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzene have been detected off-site immediately south and west of the Northwest Operations Area. However, Chevron’s monitoring of natural attenuation parameters has indicated that degradation of the TPH and benzene is occurring (RWQCB 2013). Additional information on the shallow surface water quality can be found in Appendix H.1, Attachment 6. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.5.2 Regulatory Setting 4.5.2.1 Federal Policies and Regulations Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) implements the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 SDWA), the primary federal regulation controlling drinking water quality in every public water system in the United States. The SDWA authorizes the EPA to establish and enforce guidelines for drinking water to protect against both naturally occurring and manmade contaminants. Although Congress initially passed the SDWA in 1974, it amended the law significantly in 1986 and 1996. The Act originally set standards for the treatment of individual constituents, including pesticides, trihalomethanes, arsenic, selenium, radionculides, nitrates, toxic metals, bacteria, viruses, and pathogens. The amendments to the Act made some significant changes, most of which created more stringent protection of drinking water sources. The amended Act also greatly enhanced the existing law by implementing operator training, funding for water system improvements, and public information as important components of safe drinking water. The Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulates quality standards for surface waters. Under the CWA, the EPA has implemented many pollution control standards for the industry along with water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. The CWA made it unlawful to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless the EPA authorized a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Zones The Federal Emergency Management Agency has delineated both special hazard flood areas and risk premium flood zones applicable to individual communities. The Flood Insurance Rate Maps help private citizens and insurance companies locate properties in flood risk areas, aid lending institutions when making loans, and administer floodplain management regulations in order to mitigate flood damage. The majority of the Project Site is located in Zone X, which is outside the 1% annual chance floodplain. Portions of the Project located along Tank Farm Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek are located within Zone A, which has a 1% annual chance of flooding. Due to grading operations and improvements, the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood limit delineations within the Project Site may be altered. 4.5.2.2 State Policies and Regulations State Water Resources Control Board The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and its nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) are the principal state agencies with primary responsibility for the coordination and control of water quality. The SWRCB enforces the water quality standards set forth in the Clean Water Act for State of California on behalf of the United States EPA. Most of the SWRCB objectives are based on the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, State Drinking 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Water Standards. The City of San Luis Obispo lies within Region 3, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, applicants for a federal license or permit such as a Section 404 Permit must obtain certification from the state (RWQCB), or a waiver of certification, that the activity would not adversely affect water quality. On July 12, 2013, the Central Coast Region RWQCB adopted Resolution Number R3-2013-0032 regarding Post-Construction Stormwater Management Requirements intended to focus on discharges that threaten beneficial uses and to require implementation of Best Management Practices to reduce stormwater pollutant discharges to the maximum extent practicable and protect water quality and beneficial uses. The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1987 Water Quality in California is governed by the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1987, which assigns overall responsibility for water rights and water quality protection to the SWRCB and requires the SWRCB to develop and enforce water quality standards within California. California has been delegated the authority to issue NPDES permits for all areas within its boundaries, except Indian lands. Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 provides two methods for administratively listing chemicals known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. The first method is if a body considered to be authoritative by state-qualified experts, such as the EPA or FDA, has formally identified the chemical as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity. The second method applies if a state or federal agency has formally required that the chemical be labeled or identified as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity. The criteria for the listing these chemicals is outlined in 22 CCR Section 12902. Groundwater Management Act of 1992 The Groundwater Management Act, commonly referred to as Assembly Bill 3030, provides local public agencies with increased management authority over groundwater resources. Groundwater is a valuable natural resource within California and Assembly Bill 3030 ensures safe production and quality by encouraging local agencies to work cooperatively within their jurisdictions to manage groundwater resources (California Water Code Section 10750). 4.5.2.3 Local Policies and Regulations San Luis Obispo County The County of San Luis Obispo encompasses approximately 3,300 square miles of land and has more than 260,000 residents. The San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act establishes the County Board of Supervisors’ authority to ensure sustainable water uses, reliable water supplies, and better water quality. The County Public Works Department has developed an Integrated Regional Water Management Plan, which promotes coordination with state-wide water planning efforts. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR City of San Luis Obispo The City of San Luis Obispo is the sole water purveyor within the city limits, allowing the City to maintain uniformity of water service and distribution standards. The City therefore, maintains control over water quality and ensures its consistency with the City's General Plan and Urban Water Management Plan in order to maintain an efficient long-term supply. The City manages and plans for future development and for water supplies based on the amount of water that can be supplied each year in critical drought conditions. As a result of the City’s inadequate water supply to meet anticipated build-out under the General Plan, the City contracted with the County for 3,380 acre-feet per year of water from the County’s Nacimiento pipeline, which began delivering water to the City in 2011. Overall, the City takes into account reservoir Safe Annual Yield based on historical hydrological data, contractual Dependable Yield from Nacimiento Reservoir, and recycled water availability/usage to estimate annual Water Resources Availability. Drainage Design Manual The City of San Luis Obispo also regulates hydrologic and hydraulic design of channel modifications and drainage structures within the city limits and unincorporated areas within San Luis Obispo County through its Drainage Design Manual. The manual provides criteria and planning procedures for floodplains, waterways, channels, and closed conduits in the San Luis Obispo Creek watershed. This manual should be used in conjunction with the City's Construction Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards for projects. Section 1010.B of the City’s Engineering Standards includes limited Drainage and Erosion Control Standards for development projects. 4.5.3 Significance Criteria The following water resources impacts would be considered significant if the proposed Project would: 1. Violate any water quality standards Water quality impacts would be considered potentially significant if development of the proposed Project would substantially degrade water quality or violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. 2. Discharge into surface waters or otherwise alter surface water quality. Water quality impacts would be considered potentially significant if development of the proposed Project would result in the degradation of surface water, including indirect impacts to the threatened and endangered species downstream of the Project Site. 3. Change the quality or quantity of groundwater. Groundwater quality impacts would be considered potentially significant if development of the proposed Project would result in the degradation of groundwater water, including point source and non-point source impacts, according to established water quality standards. Groundwater quantity impacts would be considered significant if development substantially depleted groundwater supplies or interfered substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4. Change the quantity or movement of available surface. Hydrologic impacts would be deemed potentially significant if the development of the proposed Project created or contributed run-off water that exceeded the capacity of stormwater drainage systems. In addition, hydrology impacts would be considered potentially significant if development of the proposed Project substantially altered the existing drainage pattern of the site in a manner which resulted in substantial erosion, siltation or flooding, on or off site. 4.5.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The remediation and restoration phase of the Project would consist of demolishing existing buildings, excavating top soil, site recontouring, capping areas with clean soil, pipe decommissioning along with addressing soil and groundwater contamination and mitigating the existing impacts to waters of the U.S., wetlands, threatened and endangered species, and rare plant habitats. In addition, impacted near-surface soils affected by petroleum would be excavated in order to improve the function of a capping system or to mitigate as identified ecological risk. The proposed Project may also include blasting of portions of the flower mound. Since all of the blasting would be done above ground, this activity would not affect groundwater wells in the vicinity of the Project Site. See Section 4.8, Noise and Vibration for a discussion of vibration associated with the blasting operations. Construction activities during the remediation and restoration phase would include mobilization, clearing and grubbing, staging, improving site access, borrow areas, site grading and chemical usage. Construction water would be available on site through the use of existing wells located at the southernmost tip of the site and along the eastern edge of the site south of Tank Farm Road. Water storage tanks, pump facilities and distribution network will be temporarily placed on-site. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.1 The remediation phase of the Project could result in short-term, impacts to surface water quality, including indirect impacts to beneficial uses such as threatened and endangered species habitat, due to polluted runoff during construction. Remediation Class II The remediation phase of the Project would include excavation, grading, possible blasting of the flower mound, and other earthwork. An increase in soil erosion and sediment transport to the surrounding surface waters would occur due to runoff waters sheet flowing over the exposed areas. The increased sedimentation could potentially degrade surface water quality and adversely impact sensitive, threatened and endangered species known to inhabit the surrounding area including the Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. In addition, the increased soil erosion and siltation could impact the municipal storm drain system, possibly resulting in clogged drainage channels, pipes, culverts and/or basins and, therefore, violate the City’s Storm Water Management Plan. The impact would be considered potentially significant. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures In order to mitigate surface water quality impacts to less than significant levels during the remediation phase, all pertinent regulatory requirements shall be satisfied and appropriate erosion control measures shall be put into effect on the Project Site. WR -1a Prior to the issuance of any construction/grading permit and/or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, a Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be submitted to the California SWRCB Stormwater Permit Unit. Compliance with the General Permit includes the preparation of a SWPPP, which shall identify potential pollutant sources that my affect the quality of discharges to stormwater, and shall include the design and placement of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the Project Site into surface water sources or wetlands or storm drains. WR -1b The Surface Water Quality Management Practices summarized below shall be implemented to reduce potential impact to surface water quality during construction- related activities. 1. Soil stockpiles and graded slopes shall be covered after 14 days of inactivity and 24 hours prior to and during inclement weather conditions. 2. Fiber rolls shall be placed along the top of exposed slopes and at the toes of graded areas to reduce surface soil movement, as necessary. 3. A routine monitoring plan shall be implemented to ensure success of all on-site erosion and sedimentation control measures. 4. Dust control measures shall be implemented to graded areas during construction activities to control fugitive dust. 5. Streets surrounding the Project Site shall be cleaned daily or as necessary. 6. Best Management Practices shall be strictly followed to prevent spills and discharges of pollutants on-site (material and container storage, proper trash disposal, construction entrances, etc.). Residual Impacts Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would reduce the identified potentially significant impact to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.2 The use of groundwater resources as a water supply for remediation could substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Remediation Class III The remediation component of the Project would require the use of groundwater resources as a water supply for remediation and construction activities. Water would be supplied by four 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR existing wells whose locations are shown in Figure 4.5-5. Three of these wells are located on the Project Site, and one is just west of the Project Site. Table 4.5-3 provides estimates of the water use for the remediation component of the Project. The water demand would peak occur in year three of the remediation phase of the Project at approximately 148 acre-feet per year. The four existing wells can provide about 153 acre-feet per year of water (Cleath 2003), which is sufficient to meet the needs of the remediation component of the Project. Table 4.5-3 Estimated Water Demand for Remediation and Restoration by Year acre-feet per year) Work Use Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Remediation Dust Control 25 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 Compaction Moisture 25 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 Restoration Nursery 21 40 63 64 19 6 2 0 Plantings 35 35 35 0 0 0 0 Total 71 125 148 99 19 6 2 0 Source: Cleath, 2011. See Appendix G.2 Based on the documented figures for groundwater extractions, current total groundwater extractions in the San Luis area are estimated to be in the range of 1,000-1,200 acre-feet per year. Groundwater extractions are significantly less than the safe yield for the basin area, whether it be the Department of Water Resources (DWR) estimate of 2,000 acre-feet per year (Bulletin 18, 1958), the DWR estimate of 2,000-2,500 acre-feet per year (unpublished findings, 1997) or the Boyle Engineering (1991) estimate of 3,650 acre-feet per year for average annual recharge to the basin. Recharge is comprised of percolation of rainfall, percolation of streamflow, and irrigation returnflows and wastewater discharge percolation. The City of San Luis Obispo discharges their wastewater to San Luis Obispo Creek near the downstream edge of the main groundwater basin area and would also be a recharge source for the Project Site (Cleath 2011). High levels of groundwater use during remediation would only last for three to four years, and therefore would be a short-term impact. Given the small amount of water use relative to the yield of the basin, and the short-term use, the impacts to groundwater basin from the remediation component of the Project would be less than significant. Water level interference on neighboring wells was evaluated for the four wells. Table 4.5-4 provides the water interference data for the wells. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.5-4 Water Level Interference Well # Discharge Rate gpm) Radius of Influence1 ft) Closest Neighboring Well (ft) Interference ft) 1 140 650 200 9 2 30 50 1,000 <1 3 20 250 700 <1 4 40 350 600 <1 1. Approximate one foot of water level drawdown at radius. Source: Cleath 2003 There are no neighboring wells within the effective radius of influence for Wells 2, 3, or 4. There is one supply well for a small business park within the sphere of influence of Well 1. Water level interference at this well would be estimated at a maximum of nine feet. A review of the construction for this well indicates that it taps a shallower aquifer zone (60-100 feet deep) than is tapped by Well 1 (100-180 feet deep). As such smaller water level interference would be expected due to this difference in well construction (Cleath 2003). The estimated changes to groundwater storage in the vicinity of the proposed Project Site during drought years are provided in Table 4.5-5. Table 4.5-5 Estimated Changes to Ground Water Storage in Vicinity of Project Site Groundwater Extraction AFY) Change in Storage from 1991 (af) Change in Water Level from 1991 (ft) 43a 0 0 52 -9 -0.1 221 -178 -2.2 230 -187 -2.4 a. Represent baseline conditions based upon the 1991 drought conditions. The water extraction value is mainly from agricultural irrigation at the Forrest parcel. Source: Cleath 2003 Based upon the data provided in Table 4.5-5, if the remediation was to occur during a drought year, water levels could decline in the vicinity of the Project Site by about one foot during the peak year of remediation. During the other years the decline would be less since less groundwater extraction would be needed. The drop in water levels from normal fall conditions to drought condition in 1991 across the basin averaged 12.3 feet for the three deeper wells monitored by the County (Cleath 2003). Adding the additional maximum one foot for storage declines for remediation water use, results in an estimated 13-foot static water level drop during drought in the vicinity of the Project Site. During the peak year of remediation, the combined impact on neighboring wells from both water level interference and decline in storage during drought years from the proposed Project would be less than three feet at most wells. The closest well could see declines of as much as 10 feet, with the majority of this being due to interference. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Given that this level of groundwater decline might potentially occur for a three year period, it would not be expected to significantly impact local ground water conditions in the vicinity of the Project Site. Therefore, the local groundwater impacts would be considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures Minimal impacts are expected to groundwater levels during the remediation phase of the proposed Project; however, the following mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce impacts generated by the Project WR -2 The Applicant shall work with the City of San Luis Obispo to obtain reclaimed water for use during the Remediation Project. Residual Impacts Impacts associated with groundwater use during remediation would be less than significant Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.3 The excavation of the contaminated soils could bring contaminant constituents to the surface where they could be mobilized by stormwater or irrigation activities. Remediation Class II According to the Remedial Action Plan, the remediation phase of the proposed Project would require the excavation of areas contaminated by surface hydrocarbons due to the previous oil storage use. Initial field investigations have shown that there are isolated pockets of plastic hydrocarbons which are the byproducts of the site fire and operational spills which have previously occurred on-site. The excavations would bring these constituents to the surface where they can be mobilized by stormwater or irrigation activities. The following mitigation measures will ensure that contaminated soils do not enter watercourses, wetlands, storm drain systems or spread across the Project Site thereby reducing the impact to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures Treatment options for contaminated soils would vary depending on the constituents present in the soils; however, conducting the appropriate testing and assessing the appropriate treatment options are necessary. WR -3a Contaminated soils that will be removed, relocated or treated on-site shall be managed according to the procedures and practices of the California Stormwater BMP Handbook. The Applicant shall conduct pre-construction environmental assessments of any contaminated soil prior to construction and have a specific treatment and BMP plan in order to prevent surface water, ground water or stormwater pollution. WR-3b All necessary precautions and preventive measures shall be taken to prevent the flow of water, including ground water, from mixing with contaminated soil. If water does enter an excavation and becomes contaminated, such water shall be discharged into 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR clean watertight holding tanks and treated or disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local laws. WR-3c Polluted soils shall not be stockpiled on-site without an approved stockpiling plan. The stockpiling plan shall detail the method to be used to prevent runoff from leaving the area, and could include measures such as covering and berming. The stockpiling plan shall be consistent with the requirements specified in AQ.1d and BIO-7c. Stockpiles shall not be permitted near storm drains or watercourses. WR-3d The Applicant shall provide training to employees and contractors in contaminated soil identification, handling and disposal procedures. Regular meetings shall be held to discuss and reinforce disposal procedures. WR-3e Plastic sheeting, tarps, sandbags, straw wattles, silt fencing, and any other implemented BMP devices shall be treated as contaminated materials and shall be removed and disposed of according to the local regulatory agencies. Residual Impacts Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would reduce the identified potentially significant impact to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.4 The construction of the remediation caps may increase or concentrate storm runoff flowing onto erodible soils from impervious surfaces. Remediation Class II According to the Remedial Action Plan, the remediation phase of the Project would involve the construction of five earthen caps located in reservoirs 3, 4, 5 and 7, as well as in the Northwest Operations Area. These caps would be constructed of structural fill from Project borrow areas in order to separate impacted materials from potential human and ecological receptors. After clearing and grubbing, a layer of fill would be put in place and compacted to Project specifications. A layer of geotextile fabric would then be laid, which would provide a warning, if applicable depending on cap location, to future construction workers that the underlying soil is potentially contaminated. Once the fabric is laid, the cap would be constructed. In order to promote proper drainage across the site, each cap’s thickness and composition would vary due to differing design objectives and individual site constraints. The construction of each cap would create a relatively impermeable surface area which will have a potentially significant impact of increased or concentrated storm runoff flowing onto erodible soils from impervious surfaces. Mitigation Measures Minimal impacts are expected to the surrounding areas due to the construction of the caps, however, in an effort to minimize any impacts, erosion control measures should be implemented during remediation construction activities. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR WR-4a The impervious surface of the caps shall be designed to ensure that storm water discharge to surrounding conveyances is non-erosive.. WR-4b The Surface Water Quality Management Practices summarized below shall be implemented to reduce potential impact to surface water quality during construction- related activities associated with remediation caps. Fiber rolls, or other equivalent techniques, shall be placed along the top of exposed edges of the cap and at the toes of graded areas to reduce surface soil movement, as necessary. Areas surrounding caps which are disturbed during construction shall be re- vegetated, as soon as is practical, prior to the beginning of the rainy season. Sandbags, or other equivalent techniques, shall be utilized along each graded cap area to prevent siltation transport to the surrounding areas. Residual Impacts Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would reduce the identified potentially significant impact to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.5 Grading and recontouring of the site could result in changes to surface water flows, thereby increasing surface water runoff from the Project Site. Remediation Class III The major activities that would occur during remediation are capping of the Northwest Operations Area and the Reservoir 4 area, remediation of the North Marsh, and restoration of the riparian function of Tank Farm Creek. The Applicant is proposing to restore as much of the original ecological function to the Tank Farm Creek corridor as possible. The Applicant is also proposing to grade the development pads as part of the remediation project. This would result in substantial changes to the topography, as well as to the stormwater management infrastructure at the Project Site. Figure 4.5-6 shows the watersheds/catchments for the post-remediated site. Impacts associated with each of these watersheds/catchments are discussed below. Tank Farm Creek The major stormwater infrastructure changes proposed by the Applicant for the Tank Farm Creek watershed as part of the remediation project include the following: South of Tank Farm Road, the Applicant is proposing to combine into a single streambed the existing property line channel and auxiliary channel. A typical cross-section of the combined streambed is shown in Figure 4.5-7. The channel would consist of an overall slope of about 0.2 percent and about 3 feet of relief. 4.5 Water Resources June 2013 4.5-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Public Draft EIR Figure 4.5-6 Overview of Watersheds for Tank Farm Project Site Post Remediation and Development Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) 2.5’x8’ BOX CULVERT (new) 3.5’X7’ BOX CULVERT (new) 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-26 June 2013 Remediation and Development Project Public Draft EIR Figure 4.5-7 Illustration of Typical Post Remediation Tank Farm Creek Channel Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Applicant also proposes to bore two 12-inch-diameter outlets near the bottom of the existing headwall, where Tank Farm Creek exits the Project Site. As discussed in Section 4.5.1.2, the area south of Tank Farm Road has limited detention capacity that is quickly consumed during a large storm event. This modification would allow for more controlled discharges and also prevent over-topping of the berm system. The new outlet inverts would be set at an elevation of 112.5 feet amsl, the local pond bottom. The existing 36-inch-diameter outlet would remain. The area south of Tank Farm Creek would be used as a borrow source for up to 41,000 cubic yards of soil. This would increase the overall detention capacity south of Tank Farm Road by approximately 14 acre-feet, a 19 percent increase over the existing condition. A cap would be constructed over the former Northwest Operations Area as part of remediation, and would serve as a pad for future development. Runoff from the cap would be routed into ditches along the upper perimeter and discharged to adjacent drainage features via hardened drops. One of the most significant restoration-driven changes is the reconfiguration of the North Marsh and Tank Farm Creek. As depicted, the East and West Forks of Tank Farm Creek will merge in the North Marsh rather than being routed around it. The typical channel sections will be similar to the illustration shown in Figure 4.5-7. The North Marsh would be increased in area by approximately 8 acres, mostly through removing historical debris. The creek would be routed through a single barrel of the box culvert beneath Tank Farm Road. The two 48-inch-diameter round culverts to the west and the other barrel of the box culvert would be abandoned. A weir would be constructed in the remaining box culvert barrel, raising its invert elevation by 2 feet. These modifications not only create an additional 17.5 acre-feet of storage capacity within the North Marsh, but also additional wetland resources. Supplemental stormwater storage capacity would be created by lowering the berms surrounding five of the former above ground storage tanks in the North Marsh area. Lowering of the berms would provide approximately 6.7 acres of additional storage. Another significant topographic alteration would be the capping of former Reservoir 4. This area would be used for future development. Grading of the area would produce large, gently sloped preliminary pads. It will also establish the alignment and rough grade of the Santa Fe Road extension and the interior local roads. New ditches would be established in the area to manage runoff. The new ditches would be routed to a detention pond. Additional information on these proposed stormwater modifications are provided in the Hydrology Study (Appendix F), and design and engineering drawings for these changes can be found in the Remedial Action Plan (Appendix A.1). The proposed Project would result in some changes to upstream water surface elevations, but the changes would help to assure there is no lateral spreading of surface runoff on to adjacent properties. These changes in topography and stormwater management control at the proposed Project Site would result in changes in the peak surface water flows at various locations. Table 4.5-6 shows the peak surface water flows at various design points (DP) within the Project Site. The locations of the DP are shown in Figure 4.5-6. The round culverts beneath Tank Farm Road, represented 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR as design point DP4, would be removed as part of the remediation project, which would result in short-term impacts to habitat and species inhabiting these areas but an overall improvement in habitat quality and function in the long-term (see Section 4.2.4). As discussed above, the existing gate valve that discharges to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek (DP7 in Figure 4.5-6) would be removed as part of the remediation component of the Project. Table 4.5-6 Summary Of Peak Surface Water Flows – Post Remediation Conditions Design Point Peak Flow (cubic feet per second) 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year DP-1 203.6 480.5 665.0 787.2 902.5 DP-2 47.4 99.4 129.0 149.8 170.7 DP-3 22.8 90.2 127.7 150.9 174.7 DP-4 -- -- -- -- -- DP-5 20.7 65.9 86.2 98.1 107.4 DP-6 20.8 57.2 74.3 81.5 87.9 DP-7 -- -- -- -- -- DP-8 6.2 10.8 13.4 15.2 17.0 DP-9 14.3 26.7 33.6 38.4 43.1 The locations of the Design Points (DP) are shown in Figure 4.5.6. Source: Avocet Hydrology Study (see Appendix F). Table 4.5-7 summarizes the peak flows and volumes for the off-site discharge from the Tank Farm Creek Watershed for various storm events. With the proposed changes to the topography and stormwater management control the volume of stormwater that can be stored on site would increase for all of the storm events evaluated. For the 100-year storm the on-site storage capacity would increase from 103.3 to 190.8 acre-feet. Overflows of the headwall would also be eliminated, and the peak flow rates off of the site into Tank Farm Creek would be reduced. Table 4.5-7 Summary Of Peak Flows and Volumes for Tank Farm Creek Off-site Discharge – Post Remediation and Development Conditions Storm Event Volumes (acre-feet) Peak Flow (cubic feet per second) Existing and New Discharges Storage Overflow Total Existing 36" Discharge Two New 12" Discharge Overflow Total 2-Year 24- Hour Storm 19.6 46.7 0.0 66.2 11.1 9.7 0.0 20.8 10-Year 24- Hour Storm 58.5 93.0 0.0 151.5 42.5 14.6 0.0 57.2 25-Year 24- Hour Storm 75.9 130.5 0.0 206.4 57.9 16.5 0.0 74.3 50-Year 24- Hour Storm 82.7 161.7 0.0 244.4 63.9 17.5 0.0 81.5 100-Yer 24- Hour Storm 91.0 190.8 0.0 281.8 69.4 18.5 0.0 87.9 Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) (see Appendix F). 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR For the 100-year storm event the peak flow into Tank Farm Creek would be reduced from 372.7 to 87.9 cubic feet per minute. This would substantially reduce the amount of stormwater runoff from the Project Site over the existing conditions. Therefore, surface water runoff impact on Tank Farm Creek would be less than significant. Tributary to East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek Very little of the topography of the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek watershed (Watershed B in Figure 4.5.6) would be changed as part of the remediation project. Limited remediation and no development would occur in this area. The Applicant has proposed to open the existing auxiliary channel to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek at the location of the existing 12-inch diameter gate valve by removing a portion of the existing berm (DP-7 in Figure 4.5-2 shows the location of proposed opening). The Applicant also proposes to open the isolated oxbow to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek by removing a portion of the berm that separates the oxbow from the creek. Additional information on these proposed creek modifications are provided in the Hydrology Study (Appendix F), and design and engineering drawings for these changes can be found in the Remedial Action Plan (Appendix A.1). Runoff from this area would still drain into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. However, as observed before, the contribution from this 19-acre catchment has insignificant effect on a watershed that is measured in square miles. The removal of the berm to open up the oxbow and the auxiliary channel would improve surface flows in this area and increase functional habitat. The direct connection will also increase the potential floodplain storage over the existing conditions. Therefore, surface water runoff impact on East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek would be less than significant. On-site Hydraulically Isolated Depressions Some of the isolated catchments would be disturbed by remediation and restoration efforts. Most of that work would not significantly alter the overall hydrologic function within the closed watershed. A thorough discussion of particular hydrologic and hydraulic features of the remediation work in this area is provided in the Remedial Action Plan (Appendix A.1). The anticipated configuration of the isolated catchments after remediation is shown in Figure 4.5-8. North of Tank Farm Road, five of the seven containment berms for the former aboveground storage tanks would be lowered, as discussed in the Tank Farm Creek section above. The lowering of these berms would now make these five areas part of the Tank Farm Creek Watershed area. The eastern portion of the isolated catchments, that part south of Tank Farm Road, would be used for development. It would also be used as a borrow source for topsoil during remediation. One of the final tasks during remediation would be backfilling to establish rough grade pads for future development in this area. This area is Watershed C2 in Figure 4.5-6. This separate isolated area would be about 23 acres in size. A detention and sedimentation basin would be built just south of the development areas to contain erosion of the soil cover. Runoff from the pads would occur as sheet flow, but would be concentrated into small channels and directed to the new basin. The sizing of the basin and the hydraulic function of the ditches are presented in the Remedial Action Plan (Appendix A.1). 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Runoff from this area would be retained on site, but could be discharged to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek, or one of the adjacent oxbows, if that were deemed to be ecologically advantageous. Given that the runoff from this area would be contained on site, surface water runoff impact on the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek would be less than significant. Figure 4.5-8 On-site Isolated Catchments Post Remediation and Development Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Watershed E, which is located on the far eastern portion of the site just north of Tank Farm Road see Figure 4.5-6) would be separated from its original isolated catchment by the extension of Santa Fe Road. With this change in grade, this 10-acre catchment would now drain, via a naturally vegetated perimeter ditch, to Acacia Creek. Peak flows would range between 14 and 43 cubic feet per second, for the 2-year and 100-year storms, respectively. Total discharge for the 100-year storm is estimated to be 5 acre-feet, while the total discharge from the 2-year storm is anticipated to be less than 2 acre-feet. These volumes and flow rates are insignificant compared to those for Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Therefore, surface water runoff impact on Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek would be less than significant. Other Minor Watersheds Watershed D (See Figure 4.5-6) is a small area of the Project Site (approximately 11 acres) that currently drains east via sheet flow to the adjacent property. This area would be part of the development, and grading of the pads would occur as part of the remediation activities. At the conclusion of the remediation activities this area would be increased to seven acres. Runoff would be collected in a ditch along the property line that would discharge into the shoulder ditch that runs along Tank Farm Creek and from there into Acacia Creek (see Design Point DP-8 in Figure 4.5-6. A small basin located just before the ditch along Tank Farm Road would be used to attenuate the peak flow and to reduce sediment load. The peak flows through this channel are provided in Table 4.5-3. These volumes and flow rates are insignificant compared to those for Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Therefore, surface water runoff impact on Acacia Creek and the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required since impacts are less than significant. Residual Impacts Impacts associated with surface water runoff would be less than significant (Class III). 4.5.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Under the City Development Plan component of the Project, development would be annexed into the City limits and utilize City water. Although groundwater from on-site wells would be used for the remediation and restoration phase of the Project, no groundwater from the on-site wells would be used by the development component of the Project. The impacts of the use of City water are discussed in the Public Services and Utilities Section of the EIR (Section 4.13). 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.6 Paving and development could result in changes to surface water flows thereby increasing surface water runoff from the Project Site. Development Class III As discussed in Impact WR.5, most of the grading for the future development would occur as part of the remediation component of the Project. In addition, most of the site-wide stormwater infrastructure would be installed as part of the remediation component of the Project. As such, much of the discussion in Impact WR.5 would also apply to the City Development Plan, and all changes to the watersheds would occur as part of the remediation aspect of the Project. However, development would alter the character of portions of the watershed and the means by how some of the water is conveyed across the site. The two most significant changes would be construction of a storm drain system with drop inlets, catch basins, and other urban type infrastructure, and the degree to which the developed areas are paved. Figure 4.5-6 shows the proposed development areas (hatched areas on the figure). The development changes would be expected to be minor relative to the degree of paving that will occur since most of the grading would occur as part of the remediation aspect of the Project. For the purpose of this analysis it has been assumed that 80 percent of the development area would be paved or converted to impervious rooftop, and 20 percent remains as landscaping. The former Northwest Operations Area and the eastern development (former Reservoir 4 and Flower Mound) north of Tank Farm Road would be part of the Tank Farm Creek Watershed. The Northwest Operations Area development would include minor modification of the grades and the installation of catch basins and storm drains. Proposed development-related infrastructure to manage stormwater is provided in the Hydrology Study (Appendix F). Only backbone or tract- level infrastructure is shown. The Applicant has not yet developed lot-level infrastructure. A considerable portion of this area already has impervious surfaces from the existing offices and other structures. Stormwater from this area and road currently flows into the naturally vegetated channel along Tank Farm Road. With the City Development Plan, stormwater draining from approximately 48 acres of land will be collected into catch basins and storm drains and routed into the North Marsh Area. Table 4.5-8 shows the peak surface water flows at various design points (DP) within the Project Site for post development. The locations of the DP are shown in Figure 4.5-6. Paving the eastern development area would substantially increase runoff through DP3 (Table 4.5-8) relative to the existing and post-remediation conditions. However, the detention and sedimentation pond, discussed under the remediation aspect of the Project, would be engineered to accommodate this volume and flow rate. In accordance with RWQCB and AASP development requirements, the detention basin would supplement other proposed best management practices, such as the vegetated swale along Tank Farm Road and the lot-level stormwater infrastructure e.g., catch basin trash and oil/water separators) that would be designed during implementation of the City Development Plan. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.5-8 Summary Of Peak Surface Water Flows – Post Development Conditions Design Point Peak Flow (cubic feet per second) 2-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year DP-1 203.7 480.6 665.0 787.2 902.6 DP-2 36.7 82.3 129.0 127.5 149.3 DP-3 51.9 140.7 127.7 202.5 226.6 DP-4 -- -- -- -- -- DP-5 22.7 68.4 88.6 100.2 109.2 DP-6 22.5 58.3 75.0 81.5 86.8 DP-7 -- -- -- -- -- DP-8 -- -- -- -- -- DP-9 3.5 6.1 7.5 8.5 9.5 The locations of the Design Points (DP) are shown in Figure 4.5-6. Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) (see Appendix F). The increased runoff from the development area following paving would be absorbed by the improvements to the detention capacity of the North Marsh that is discussed as part of Impact WR.5 in the Remediation Impact section above. Consequently, flow rates at DP5 (the box culvert across Tank Farm Road) and DP6 (the Headwall discharge of Tank Farm Creek from the Project Site) would remain substantially less than the existing condition and would be similar to those for the post-remediation condition, especially for larger storms. As part of the City Development Plan on the eastern part of the site just north of Tank Farm Road, a new detention/sedimentation basin would be constructed for the treatment of runoff before discharging to the existing isolated on-site ponds. This basin is discussed in Impact WR.5 as part of the remediation component of the Project. The basin would collect runoff from approximately 8.5 acres of developed portion of the site west of the proposed Santa Fe Road extension. After development the ponds used for storing the stormwater from this area would store approximately 2 and 6.2 acre-feet of runoff for the 2-year and 100-year storms, respectively. The added runoff is a direct result of paving and other impermeable surfaces that coincide with development activities and a slightly larger catchment area generated as a result of developmental grading. None of the stormwater from this area would be discharged off-site. The remaining development east of the Santa Fe Road extension (approximately 2 acres) would drain via sheet flow to Acacia Creek. The runoff from this area would be greatly reduced (DP9 in Table 4.5-8) relative to the post-remediation condition due to catchment reconfiguration from grading and storm drain construction activities. Runoff is expected to discharge to Acacia Creek via sheet flow at a rate of approximately 3.5 and 9.5 cubic feet per second for the 2-year and 100-year storms, respectively. These volumes and flow rates are insignificant compared to those for Acacia Creek and would not be expected to have any significant impact on bank storage or recharge. Based upon the discussion above, surface water runoff impact from the City Development Plan component of the Project would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required since impacts are less than significant. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts Impacts associated with surface water runoff would be less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.7 Flooding of development structures or redirection of flood flows could occur if buildings are built within the 100-year flood plain. Development Class III Figure 4.5-9 show the 100-year flood plain for post remediation and development. A number of the proposed grading activities discussed above would serve to change the area of the site that would be within the 100-year flood plain. The Applicant in conjunction with the Lead Agency would be required to obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and a letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). These documents would change the 100-year flood zone maps for the Project Site. None of the development areas would be within the 100-year flood plain. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is required since impacts are less than significant. Residual Impacts Impacts associated with flooding would be less than significant (Class III). 4.5.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Under the County Development Plan component of the Project, development would remain in the County and the Project Site would not be annexed into the City of San Luis Obispo. Development for the County Development Plan would be similar to the City Development Plan, and all of the impacts discussed for the City Development Plan would apply to the County Development Plan component of the Project. As discussed in Impact WR.5, most of the grading for the development would occur as part of the remediation aspect of the Project. In addition, most of the site-wide stormwater infrastructure would be installed as part of the remediation. As such, much of the discussion in Impact WR.5 would also apply to the County Development Plan, and all changes to the watersheds would occur as part of the remediation component of the Project. The County of San Luis Obispo does not currently have potable water facilities in the area of the Project Site. As such, the Applicant has proposed to use existing groundwater wells to supply water for the development component of the Project. In addition, under the County Development Plan, a wastewater treatment facility would be built to handle all the wastewater from the development. Impacts associated with the wastewater treatment facility have been discussed in the Wastewater section of the EIR (Section 4.6). 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.5-9 100-Year Flood Plan Post Remediation and Development Source: Hydrology Study (Avocet 2009) 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.8 The use of groundwater for the County Development Plan could result in substantially depleted groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Development Class II Wells pumping groundwater from the San Luis Obispo Valley groundwater basin would provide water for the Project. The County Development Plan would include three on-site wells to provide water and a wastewater treatment facility to provide water and sewer service to the development. The Applicant has prepared conceptual designs for these facilities. Appendix A.2 provides a preliminary design and assessment for the wastewater treatment facilities. There are four existing water wells that are being proposed to supply the County Development Plan aspect of the Project: Wells 1, 2, 3 and 4 (see Figure 4.5-5). These wells have been constructed and tested. Water quality results indicate that the water is suitable for domestic water use purposes (Cleath 2002). Currently, one well is being used for livestock water and the others are capped. The water pipelines for the County Development Plan would be a new system designed specifically for this component of the Project and would include a dual pipe system to allow for delivery of potable and recycled water. Water storage facilities would include separate storage for the recycled water (100,000 gallons) and pumped groundwater (1,000,000 gallons). Wastewater would be treated at a centralized treatment facility, resulting in effluent that would be required to meet water quality standards for use as a non-potable water supply (referred to as recycled” water). This recycled water would be used for irrigation and toilet uses (more than 50 percent of the total water demand). A portion of the recycled water during the rainy season would have to be discharged due to the reduction in landscaping water demand. Additional information on the wastewater treatment plant can be found in Section 4.6, Wastewater. The gross water demand for the County Development Plan would be met with pumped groundwater and recycled water. The amount of groundwater pumpage would vary depending on seasonal demand fluctuations and instantaneous demand fluctuations that would be balanced by the amount of water stored in the water supply water tanks. Estimated groundwater pumping rates for average and peak conditions are shown in Table 4.5-9. This represents the long-term water use for the development once it is fully built out. Table 4.5-9 Water Supply Requirements for Full Development Unit Gross Demand Recycled Water Groundwater Pumpage Groundwater Peak Month Groundwater Peak Flow Acre-feet per year 119.7 61.6 58.1 Average Daily Demand, gallons 106,900 55,000 51,900 88,000 Gallons per minute 74 38 36 61 153 Source: SB 610 Water Supply Assessment, Appendix G.2. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-37 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Build out of the full County Development Plan is expected to occur over a 25 year period. During these first 25 years there would be reduced water demand for the development, but additional water demand for construction. Table 4.5-10 provides an estimate of the of the projected groundwater extraction rates for the Project by each of the five development phases. Table 4.5-10 Project Groundwater Extractions by Development Phase (acre-feet per year) Years from Start of Remediation 4 9 14 19 24 Full Buildout Remediation and Restoration 99 0 0 0 0 0 Development Construction 7 7 7 7 7 0 Development Phase 1 7 Phase 2 43 Phase 3 49 Phase 4 53 Phase 5 58 58 Total Extractions 113 50 56 60 65 58 There is also an additional one-year demand of 27 acre feet for development for each phase of the Project. This additional water demand could be meet by the well that is currently used at the site (Well #4), which has a long-term yield of about 19 acre-feet per year. Source: SB 610 Water Supply Assessment, Appendix G.2. The amount of groundwater extractions that would be required for the Project would increase as the phases are built out. Once the Project has reached build-out, the long-term water demands would stabilize at those values estimated in Table 4.5-9. A brief description of the County Development Plan by phase is listed below. Each of the five development phases proposes approximately 160,000 square feet of development. Descriptions below include features unique to each phase, the gross water demand (recycled and pumped groundwater) of that phase and the cumulative, net water demand (pumped groundwater) for the Project. Phase 1 would involve the wastewater plant and the western industrial development and eastern Lot 4 commercial services development. The gross water demand for Phase 1 would be roughly 15 acre-feet per year. Net groundwater extraction would meet about half of this demand at 7 acre-feet per year. Phase 2 would include additional industrial and commercial development along with the hotel and recreational fields. The gross water demand for Phase 2 would be roughly 72 acre-feet per year. Net groundwater would meet half of this demand at 36 acre-feet per year. Adding Phase 2 to Phase 1, the cumulative net groundwater extraction would be 43 acre-feet per year. Phase 3 would include further development of commercial service and industrial zoned lands. The gross demand for Phase 3 would be 13 acre-feet per year. Net groundwater production would meet slightly less than half of this demand at 6 acre-feet per year. Adding Phase 3 to Phase 1 and 2, the cumulative net groundwater production would be 49 acre-feet per year. 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Phase 4 is entirely industrial. The gross water demand for Phase 4 would be 9 acre-feet per year. Net groundwater extraction would meet slightly less than half of this demand at 4 acre-feet per year. Adding Phase 4 to the other Phases, the total groundwater extraction would be 53 acre-feet per year. Phase 5 would be entirely commercial service. The gross water demand for Phase 5 would be about 12 acre-feet per year. Net groundwater extraction would meet slightly less than half of this demand at 5 acre-feet per year. Adding Phase 5 to Phases 1-4, the cumulative net groundwater production would be 58 acre-feet per year. The groundwater supply facilities proposed for the County Development Plan aspect of the Project are four existing deep groundwater wells. The reliable long-term yield for each of these wells has been estimated by Cleath & Associates in 2003 based on pumping test information, aquifer characteristics and historic groundwater level fluctuations (including drought years) and interference factors. Table 4.5-11 provides a summary of the long-term yields and capacity for each of the wells. Table 4.5-11 Long-Term Yield and Source Capacity for Groundwater Wells Well Long-Term Yield afy) Source Capacity gpm) Average use hours per day) Well 1 113 140 12 Well 2 8 30 4 Well 3 13 20 10 Well 4 19 40 7 Total 153 230 Source: Cleath 2003 Based on these long-term yield calculations, the wells would be able to produce 45 percent more water than what is estimated for groundwater extraction in the water demand calculation of the development project assuming the use of recycled water. The source capacity of the existing project wells (190 gpm) should be sufficient to provide for the peak Project groundwater demand of 180 gpm. As part of this EIR, a Water Supply Assessment was conducted pursuant to the requirements of Senate Bill (SB) 610 (refer to Appendix G.2). This analysis found that the San Luis area goundwater basin would not be overdrafted as a result of the Project’s extraction of groundwater. The long-term basin groundwater yield is significantly higher than the combined Project extraction and projected extraction from the City, agricultural and rural domestic wells. Based on the documented figures for groundwater extractions, current total groundwater extractions in the San Luis area are estimated to be in the range of 1,000-1,200 acre-feet per year. Groundwater extractions are significantly less than the safe yield for the basin area, whether it be the Department of Water Resources (DWR) estimate of 2,000 acre-feet per year (Bulletin 18, 1958), the DWR estimate of 2,000-2,500 acre-feet per year (unpublished findings, 1997) or the Boyle Engineering (1991) estimate of 3,650 acre-feet per year for average annual recharge to the basin. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-39 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Water Supply Assessment determined that the total water supplies available during normal, single dry and multiple dry water years within a 20 year projection would meet the projected water demand for the project in addition to the demand of existing and other planned future uses. Therefore, the impacts to basin wide groundwater supply from the County Development Plan component of the Project would be less than significant. As discussed above under impact WR.2, water level interference on neighboring wells was evaluated for the four wells (see Table 4.5-4, which provides the water interference data for the wells). There are no neighboring wells within the effective radius of influence for Wells 2, 3, or 4. There is one supply well for a small business park within the sphere of influence of Well 1. Water level interference at this well would be estimated at a maximum of nine feet. A review of the construction for this well indicates that it taps a shallower aquifer zone (60-100 feet deep) than is tapped by Well 1 (100-180 feet deep). As such smaller water level interference would be expected due to this difference in well construction (Cleath 2003). The estimated changes to groundwater storage in the vicinity of the Project Site during drought years are provided in Table 4.5-5. Based upon the data provided in Table 4.5-5, at full development build-out during a drought year, water levels could decline in the vicinity of the Project Site by about 0.2 feet due to the use of the on-site water wells. The drop in water levels from normal fall conditions to drought condition in 1991 across the basin averaged 12.3 feet for the three deeper wells monitored by the County (Cleath 2003). Adding the additional 0.2 feet for storage decline at full build out, results in an estimated 12.5- foot static water level drop during drought in the vicinity of the Project Site. During full buildout, the combined impact on neighboring wells from both water level interference and decline in storage during drought years from the proposed Project would be less than one foot at most wells. The closest well could see declines of as much as nine feet, with the majority of this being due to interference. The potential for a nine-foot interference level at the nearest well during the build-out phase of the Project could impact the water supply from this neighboring well. As such, this localized impact could be potentially significant. Mitigation Measures WR-8a The applicant shall implement water conservation best management practices including: selection of drought-tolerant, low water-consuming plant varieties and use of low flow plumbing fixtures. WR-8b The Applicant shall conduct annual monitoring of Wells 1, 2 and 3 on a semi-annual basis to determine water levels and correlate to water production values. The production rates shall be metered at the wells. This information shall be used to define drawdowns. The results of the monitoring and analysis shall be submitted to the County Public Works and Planning and Development Departments for review on a semi-annual basis. In the event that the analysis shows a measurable loss of the well 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR production rate, the Applicant shall reduce groundwater extractions from Well 1 to eliminate the potential for groundwater interference. Residual Impacts Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would reduce the identified potentially significant impacts to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WR.9 The use of groundwater for the County Development Plan could result in the migration of hydrocarbons from the shallow ground water to the deep groundwater wells. Development Class II Petroleum released during site operations between 1910 and the early 1980s has impacted soil and groundwater underlying the Project Site. A number of investigations have been conducted since the late 1980s to assess the nature and distribution of hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater. These investigations have identified three principal areas of subsurface petroleum occurrence: Northwest Area - underlying the former Northwest Operations Area. This area includes several smaller, separate occurrences that underlie former pipelines and former steel ASTs located north and northeast of the field offices. Vertically, residual petroleum in this area is limited to a depth of approximately 25 feet, but mostly occurs in the 10- to 15-foot depth range. Northeast Area - beneath former Reservoir 4. Petroleum-impacted soil and bedrock were found to extend from the ground surface to depths of up to 50 feet. Southern Area – underlying most of the Project Site south of Tank Farm Road. Impacted soil occurs primarily in the 5- to 25-foot depth range. Locally, impacted soil extends as deep as 50 feet below Reservoirs 2 and 3. A portion of the subsurface petroleum in this area extends onto private property south of the Project Site. Within these areas, the petroleum does not exist as a contiguous, homogeneous body, but rather occurs largely (in terms of volume) within the intergranular space of more permeable sand lenses and, to a lesser degree, as thin films of viscous petroleum in root pores and along fractures in fine-grained silts and clays (Groundwater Technology 1991). Due to the nature of alluvial systems, such as that underlying the Project Site, these permeable sand lenses are laterally and vertically discontinuous, separated by fine-grained, low permeability sediments. Consequently, the liquid oil has become trapped and is stratigraphically contained by the fine-grained sediments. The crude oil’s high viscosity alone renders it hundreds to thousands of times less mobile than water. Computer simulations and over 20 years of monitoring have shown that the subsurface liquid petroleum plume has achieved equilibrium and there is no further lateral migration. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-41 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The potential for impacts to on-site water wells constructed outside of petroleum impacted soil areas are more likely to result from dissolved petroleum constituents. The vast majority of the petroleum impact at the Project Site is geochemically incapable of generating a dissolved hydrocarbon fraction capable of significantly degrading downgradient groundwater quality. However, the petroleum underlying the Northwest Operations Area is capable of producing a dissolved hydrocarbon fraction that could potentially impact groundwater wells. The deep groundwater wells, which would be used for the County Development Plan aspect of the Project, have been tested for TPH as well as a host of other water constituents. All of the wells had levels of TPH that were below the practical quantification limit (i.e., non-detects). The analysis of the groundwater samples showed that the water met California drinking water standards (Cleath 2002). Three of these wells are located on the southern and eastern boundary of the southern parcel, a considerable distance from the former Northwest Operations Area (refer to Figure 4.5-6), which has shown to have the highest levels of TPH contamination in the shallow groundwater. A fourth well is located off-site, approximately 550 feet west of the former Northwest Operations Area, north of Tank Farm Road. There is also an existing groundwater well in this area that is currently used to provide non-potable water to the tank farm offices. The location of this well is shown in Figure 4.5-6. The Applicant is not proposing to use this well for remediation or County Development Plan. The RWQCB has express concern about using the existing well in the Northwest Operations Area and Well #4 as a source of drinking water or other domestic use due to the potential for dissolved TPH contamination (Kukol, 2013). In the Northwest Operations Area the petroleum in the saturated zone also contains a light fraction (C5-C20), including benzene. This light fraction is responsible for the Northwest Operations Area being the only area of the site where groundwater containing dissolved petroleum (TPH and benzene) exceeds concentrations greater than maximum contaminant levels MCLs). Subsequent studies have demonstrated that natural processes have limited dissolved- phase impacts to areas immediately adjacent to the southwest corner of the Northwest Operations Area (Avocet 2011, See Appendix G.3). Shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the groundwater wells has shown TPH levels below 0.6 ppm, which is below the State of California Maximum Containment Level of one ppm TPH. As the deep groundwater wells are used for extraction, they would create a cone of depression that could draw contaminated groundwater from the shallow saturated zone into the deep saturated zone (greater than 50 feet) causing contamination of the drinking water. Tests were performed to determine the degree of hydraulic communication between the shallow, petroleum-impacted, and deep (e.g., greater than 50 feet) saturated zones on the Project Site situated north and south of Tank Farm Road. These tests involved the installation of two “water supply” wells within or immediately adjacent to petroleum-impacted soils and constructed in accordance with County of San Luis Obispo well construction standards (minimum annular seal depth of 50 feet). The tests were monitored by one or more observation wells completed in the shallow saturated zone (<30 feet) and located at varying distances and directions from the water supply wells. The water supply wells were pumped for 24 hours while water levels in both the supply and observation wells were continuously recorded using pressure transducers and data loggers. Groundwater samples, collected from the supply wells at the beginning, middle, and end of the tests, were submitted to an analytical laboratory and tested for TPH and BTEX. The 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-42 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR aquifer tests revealed that sustained drawdowns in excess of 20 feet in the supply wells had no significant effect on water levels in the shallow saturated zone. Furthermore, the laboratory analytical results revealed no detectable concentrations of TPH (<100 g/l) or benzene (<0.5 g/l). The conclusion of both aquifer tests was that the degree of communication between the shallow and deep (e.g., greater than 50 feet) saturated zones is limited (Avocet 2011, See Appendix D.3). In addition the following evidence would indicate that migration of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents to deeper pumped zones is highly unlikely: Numerous years of groundwater monitoring have not show any migration of contamination to the deep groundwater that would be used for providing drinking water. Studies focused on the petroleum hydrocarbon itself in various areas of the Tank Farm property have not shown any contamination of the deep groundwater. Investigation of vertical gradients with the groundwater would indicate that contamination does not migrate to the deep groundwater. The currently used onsite supply well has not induced downward migration of even the most mobile petroleum hydrocarbon mixture on the Tank Farm site. The results of the long-term monitoring, current supply well and the various studies would indicate that that it is highly unlikely that contamination from the shallow saturated zone would move into the deep zone and impact the groundwater wells. Even with this extensive amount of study and evaluation, it is not possible to define the geology and hydrogeology or the nature and extent of various waste constituents with 100 percent certainty. In addition, the pump test of the wells were of a short duration tests lasting only a few days, and may not be fully representative of the conditions when the groundwater wells are in long-term use and during periods of drought. Therefore, there is a potential for migrating contaminants to impact the groundwater wells, which would be a significant impact. Mitigation Measures WR-9a Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase I of the County Development Plan, the Applicant shall prepare and implement a sentinel monitoring program that would include wells positioned and constructed to specifically monitor inflowing water in the vicinity of the groundwater wells that would provide information on any approaching petroleum-related constituents of concern. If petroleum-related constituent of concern are detected, then an adsorptive carbon canister system or other method approved by the RWQCB and the County shall be installed to assure that the water from the well meets drinking water standards. . WR-9b Upon completion of the remediation activities, the Applicant shall abandon the existing groundwater well located in the Northwest Operations Area. The well shall be abandoned in accordance with applicable Department of Water Resources requirements. WR-9c The Applicant shall not use Well #4 as a source of water for the County Development Plan. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-43 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts Implementation of the proposed mitigation measure would assure that the groundwater from the wells if it became contaminated would be treated to meet drinking water standards. Adsorptive carbon canisters is a proven technology that is widely accepted by regulatory agencies and used by many water users. The City of San Luis Obispo implemented such technology on select supply wells in the early 1990s to reduce concentrations of chlorinated hydrocarbons to acceptable regulatory drinking water standards. As such, this impact would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.5.7 Cumulative Analysis The County Development Plan aspect of the Project proposes the use of groundwater from existing on-site wells. Significant cumulative impacts may occur to the groundwater source, neighboring properties water supply, and the existing wells if excessive drawn-down were to occur. Based upon the Water Supply Assessment Report (Appendix G.2), the total water supplies available during normal, single dry and multiple dry water years within a 20 year projection would meet the projected water demand for the Project in addition to the demand of existing and other planned future uses. Therefore, cumulative impacts to groundwater would be less than significant for the County Development Plan. Impacts associated with the use of water provided through the City’s utility system for the City Development Plan aspect of the Project are discussed in the Public Services and Utilities Section of the EIR (Section 4.13). The City’s Urban Water Management Plan and the Water Supply Assessment prepared by the City of San Luis Obispo for the Project (Appendix G.1) shows that the City can provide water to the proposed Project during normal, single dry and multiple dry water years within a 20 year projection and meet the projected water demand for the project in addition to the demand of existing and other planned future uses. Therefore, cumulative impacts to groundwater would be less than significant for the City Development Plan. The region of influence or surface water quality-related impacts would be limited to those cumulative projects located within the same watershed. The remediation and development components of the Project would be designed to reduce the flow of stormwater off the site from the current existing conditions. The King Ventures and Serra Meadows development located to the north of the Project Site have constructed a retention basin just north of the Project Site boundary in the Tank Farm Creek watershed (see Figure 4.5-6). The basin would help control stormwater flows into the North Marsh areas of the Project Site. This would serve to limit the cumulative surface water impacts to less than significant. Another cumulative condition is associated with the outlet to Tank Farm Creek downstream of the Project Site. At present, the creek downstream of the Project Site outlet is routed through an existing industrial development, across land slated for future development, and finally across agricultural lands until joining the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Even though stormwater flows from the Project Site, including the Project, would be reduced over the existing conditions, potential future development in this area could be affected by flow regime. Improved hydraulic performance and better flood management could be achieved by routing Tank Farm Creek 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-44 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR through the southern property line of the Project Site (see Figure 4.5-6) and establishing a riparian corridor that continues the proposed Project’s restoration plan to the downstream confluence. However, developing and implementing that proposal would require a regional working group that would include land owners adjacent to Tank Farm Creek, the City of San Luis Obispo, and the Public Works Department of San Luis Obispo County, as well as various regulatory agencies. The above notwithstanding, given that the Project would reduce stormwater flows compared to existing conditions, the Project’s cumulative impacts to stormwater flows would be less than significant. 4.5.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.5.8.1 Remediation Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party WR-1a Prior to the issuance of any construction/grading permit and/or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, a Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be submitted to the California SWRCB Stormwater Permit Unit. Compliance with the General Permit includes the preparation of a SWPPP, which shall identify potential pollutant sources that my affect the quality of discharges to stormwater, and shall include the design and placement of BMPs to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the Project Site into surface water sources or wetlands or storm drains. Review of Plan & Site Inspection Plan Review and submittal prior to any grading permits for Remediation or Construction. Site Inspections shall occur on an ongoing basis during construction. RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo WR-1b Surface Water Quality Management Practices shall be implemented to reduce potential impact to surface water quality during construction-related activities. 1. Soil stockpiles and graded slopes shall be covered after 14 days if inactivity and 24 hours prior to and during inclement weather conditions. 2. Fiber rolls shall be placed along the top of exposed slopes and at the toes of graded areas to reduce surface soil movement, as necessary. 3. A routine monitoring plan shall be implemented to ensure success of all on-site erosion and sedimentation control measures. 4. Dust control measures shall be implemented to graded areas during construction activities to control fugitive dust. 5. Streets surrounding the Project Site shall be cleaned daily or as necessary. 6. Best Management Practices shall be strictly Review of Plan & Site Inspection Plan Review and submittal prior to any grading permits for Remediation or Construction. Site Inspections shall occur on an ongoing basis during construction. RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-45 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party followed to prevent spills and discharges of pollutants on-site (material and container storage, proper trash disposal, construction entrances, etc). WR-2 The Applicant shall work with the City of San Luis Obispo to obtain reclaimed water for use during the Remediation Project. Review of agreement between City and Applicant Prior to grading permit for remediation County of San Luis Obispo WR-3a Contaminated soils that will be removed, relocated or treated on site shall be managed according to the procedures and practices of the California Stormwater BMP Handbook. The owner/developer shall conduct pre-construction environmental assessments of any contaminated soil prior to construction and have a specific treatment and BMP plan in order to prevent surface water, ground water or stormwater pollution. Review of Plans, SWPPP report and Site Inspections During remediation and Construction phases. RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo WR-3b All necessary precautions and preventive measures shall be taken to prevent the flow of water, including ground water, from mixing with contaminated soil. If water does enter an excavation and becomes contaminated, such water shall be discharged into clean watertight holding tanks and treated or disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local laws. Review of Plans, SWPPP report and Site Inspections During remediation and Construction phases. RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo WR-3c Polluted soils shall not be stockpiled on site without an approved stockpiling plan. The stockpiling plan shall detail the method to be used to prevent runoff from leaving the area, and could include measures such as covering and berming. The stockpiling plan shall be consistent with the requirements specified in AQ.1d and BIO-7c.. Stockpiles shall not be permitted near storm drains or watercourses. Review of Plans, SWPPP report and Site Inspections During remediation and Construction phases. County of San Luis Obispo WR-3d The Applicant shall provide training to employees and contractors in contaminated soil identification, handling and disposal procedures. Regular meetings shall be held to discuss and reinforce disposal procedures. Review of Plans, SWPPP report and Site Inspections Prior to and during Remediation and Construction phases. RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo WR-3e Plastic sheeting, tarps, sandbags, straw wattles, silt fencing, and any other implemented BMP devices shall be treated as contaminated materials and shall be removed and disposed of according to the local regulatory agencies. Review of Plans, SWPPP report and Site Inspections During remediation and Construction phases. County of San Luis Obispo WR-4a The impervious surface of the caps shall be designed to ensure that storm water discharge to surrounding conveyances is non-erosive. Review of Plans, and Site Inspections Remediation Phase County of San Luis Obispo WR-4b The Surface Water Quality Management Practices shall be implemented to reduce potential impact to surface water quality during construction-related activities associated with remediation caps. Fiber rolls, or other equivalent techniques, shall Review of Plans, and Site Inspections During remediation and Construction phases. RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-46 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party be placed along the top of exposed edges of the cap and at the toes of graded areas to reduce surface soil movement, as necessary. Areas surrounding caps which are disturbed during construction shall be re-vegetated, as soon as is practical, prior to the beginning of the rainy season. Sandbags, or other equivalent techniques, shall be utilized along each graded cap area to prevent siltation transport to the surrounding areas. 4.5.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan No specific mitigation measures were identified for the City Development Plan. The majority of the water impacts associated with the development would occur during the remediation project. This would include the preliminary grading of the development pads and the installation of the site wide stormwater infrastructure. As such, a number of the mitigation measures identified for the remediation project would be applicable to the City Development Plan. 4.5.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan The majority of the water impacts associated with the development would occur during the remediation project. This would include the preliminary grading of the development pads and the installation of the site wide stormwater infrastructure. As such, a number of the mitigation measures identified for the remediation project would be applicable to the County Development Plan. Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party WR-8a The applicant shall implement water conservation best management practices including; selection of drought-tolerant, low water-consuming plant varieties and use of low flow plumbing fixtures. Review and approval of plans. During lifetime of the Development Plan County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Development Department 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-47 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party WR-8b The Applicant shall conduct annual monitoring of Wells 1, 2 and 3 on a semi-annual basis to determine water levels and correlate to water production values. The production rates shall be metered at the wells. This information shall be used to define drawdowns. The results of the monitoring and analysis shall be submitted to the County for review on a semi-annual basis. In the event that the analysis shows a measurable loss of the well production rate, the Applicant shall reduce groundwater extractions from Well 1 to eliminate the potential for groundwater interference. Review of semi-annual monitoring reports During lifetime of the Development Plan County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Development Department WR-9a Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase I of the County Development Plan, the Applicant shall prepare and implement a sentinel monitoring program that would include wells positioned and constructed to specifically monitor inflowing water in the vicinity of the groundwater wells that would provide information on any approaching petroleum-related constituents of concern. If petroleum-related constituents of concern are detected, then an adsorptive carbon canister system or other method approved by the RWQCB and the County shall be installed to assure that the water from the well meets drinking water standards. Review of monitoring plan Review of monitoring reports Review of design of adsorptive carbon canister system Prior to issuance of building permits Ongoing during life of development RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Development Department WR-9b Upon completion of the remediation activities, the Applicant shall abandon the existing groundwater well located in the Northwest Operations Area. The well shall be abandoned in accordance with applicable Department of Water Resources requirements. Review of well abandonment records Upon completion of remediation activities. RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Development Department WR-9c The Applicant shall not use Well #4 as a source of water for the County Development Plan. Inspection of water supply piping. Review of documents releasing water rights to the well owner/ Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase I RWQCB County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Development Department 4.5 Water Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.5-48 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.5.9 References Avocet Environmental, Inc. January 26, 2009. Hydrology Study Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. 2009. Avocet Environmental, Inc. December 2, 2011. Technical Memorandum: Environmental Issues Concerning Future Water Supply Wells. 2011. California Coastal Conservancy. January 2002. San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed Enhancement Plan. 2002. California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2013. Integrated Water Resources Information System (IWRIS). http://www.water.ca.gov/iwris/. Accessed on January 15, 2013. California Department of Water Resources (DWR), 1980, Groundwater Basins in California, Bulletin 118-80 Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2013, Letter to Phil Dunsmore, Site Cleanup Program: Unocal (Chevron) San Luis Obispo Tank Farm; San Luis Obispo-Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report. August 9, 2013. City of San Luis Obispo. 2005, San Luis Obispo Airport Area Specific Plan. 2005 2011, 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. 2010. City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department. 2008. Annual Water Quality Report City of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Works. February 2003. Waterway Management Plan, Drainage Design Manual (Volume III) Cleath & Associates. September 30, 2002. Well Construction and Testing, Groundwater Exploration, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Property, San Luis Obispo, California. 2002. January 10, 2003. Preliminary Environmental Impacts Study for Water Resources, Unocal Tank Farm Property, San Luis Obispo, California. 2003. December 2011. SB 610 Water Assessment for Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Project. 2011. June 5, 2002. Hydrogeology Studies of San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Property, San Luis Obispo, California. 2002. October 25, 2002. Water Systems Options for Serving Proposed Development of San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Property, San Luis Obispo, California. 2002. June 2002. Technical Specifications for Four (4) Water Supply Wells. 2002. 4.5 Water Resources December 2013 4.5-49 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Groundwater Technology, Inc. August 9, 1991, Analysis of Subsurface Crude Oil, Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. 1991. Jones & Stokes, 2003, Program and Environmental Impact Report, Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related Facilities Master Plan. Kukol, Diane, RQWCB, 2013, Memo to Chuck Lambert, on use of groundwater as a source of potable water, January 29, 2013. McDaniel Lambert. June 26, 2012. Update Health Risk Assessment, San Luis Tank Farm, Version 1.0. 2012. San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. 2012. Urban Water Management Plan (Zone 3). San Luis Obispo County (SLOC). 2012. Public Works Division. 2012 Master Water Report. May 2012. Slowatersheds.org (SLOWS). 2007. http://slowatersheds.org/. Accessed on January 15, 2013. WSC Corporation, 2011, Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Feasibility Assessment, Chevron Tank Farm Development. 2011. Personal Communication, Hal Hannula, P.E., Supervising Civil Engineer, City of San Luis Obispo Public Works Department, 2013. 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.6 Wastewater This section discusses the impacts of wastewater discharges associated with the remediation and development components of the proposed Project. It also addresses potential Project impacts on surface and groundwater quality, and wastewater service providers. For each sub-topic, existing conditions, thresholds of significance, impacts, and mitigation measures are addressed. The Project involves developing portions of the Project Site through entitlements for commercial and industrial land uses. The Applicant's goal is to develop approximately 51 acres of the 332- acre property with approximately 800,000 square feet of commercial/industrial development, of which approximately 30 acres would be business park and the other 21 acres would be used for services and manufacturing. The remaining portion of the Project Site is intended to be dedicated as open space. Prior to the development phase of the Project, site remediation work would occur. Details of the remediation and development components of the Project are provided in Chapter 2.0, Project Description. Upon completion, the Project’s wastewater infrastructure could potentially impact surface water quality, groundwater quality, and/or City wastewater disposal services, depending on which development path is pursued (i.e., the City or County Development Plan). Under the County Development Plan, the Project Site would remain within County jurisdiction and wastewater disposal would therefore be accomplished by an on-site water wastewater treatment facility. Under the City Development Plan, the Project Site would be annexed into the City and served by the City by extending existing wastewater service utilities. The Project Site is directly adjacent to the City limits and according to as-built wastewater plans, the proposed Project could be serviced from either the eastern or western property boundaries, if annexed (City 2010). 4.6.1 Environmental Setting 4.6.1.1 Physical Setting The Project Site is located within the unincorporated area of the County south of the City limits along Tank Farm Road. The tank farm, constructed in 1910, was as an accumulation point for petroleum pipelines from the San Joaquin Valley. The tank farm slowly withdrew from operation and by the late 1990s the site was fully decommissioned. Currently the Project Site is mostly undeveloped with scattered remnants of the tank farm facility that was constructed beginning in 1910. The site consists of native grasslands and both natural wetlands and wetlands from water accumulation within the former oil storage facilities. However, soil conditions in these areas have poor percolation characteristics resulting in negligible wastewater percolation opportunities. 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Additionally, cattle currently graze the open space for fire prevention and weed control. Urban developments within the City and the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA) surround the Project Site. The Project includes remediation and restoration of the Project Site and development of portions of the property. The 332-acre Project Site drains essentially via sheet flow to the south. Natural slopes ascend to the north and northeast at gradients up to 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). Total relief across the Project Site is approximately 40 feet. Current land use is primarily undeveloped open space. 4.6.1.2 Surface Waters The Project Site has three primary watersheds/catchments including on-site isolated catchments, the Tank Farm Creek watershed, and the on-site tributary to the East Fork of the San Luis Obispo Creek. The on-site isolated catchments include numerous protected wetland areas and man-made containment areas which were formally containment basins used by the tank farm facility. These containment basins are isolated depressions which, according to the Hydrology Study, encompass approximately 140 acres of the Project Site (Avocet 2009). The basins are not connected to any watersheds or creeks and gather water only through direct precipitation or infiltration. Tank Farm Creek is a tributary to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. According to the site Hydrology Study, 4000 feet of the creek are located on the Project Site (Avocet 2009). The watershed area is approximately 636 acres; an estimated 160 acres of the watershed are within the Project Site. The Project Site also contains approximately 19 acres that discharge directly to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. The tributary area is in the southeast portion of the Project Site. Additional baseline information on the surface waters is provided in Section 4.5, Water Resources. 4.6.1.3 Groundwater The San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin (SLOGWB) underlies the San Luis and Edna Valleys and is bound on the northeast by the Santa Lucia Range and on the southwest by the San Luis Range. The groundwater basin is an elongated trough of relatively recent (Pleistocene and Holocene age) sediments approximately 13 miles long and 2 miles wide. The SLOGWB is recharged primarily by streams flowing from the northeast. Groundwater levels fluctuate seasonally as the majority of precipitation falls in the winter months and the summer months are typically dry. The City currently has two operational potable wells, one non-potable well, and two irrigation wells. Approximately two percent of the City's annual water demand is supplied by the groundwater basin. The majority of the groundwater use from the basin is used by agriculture and private property purposes (City of San Luis Obispo 2010 Urban Water Management Plan). 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR According to the data presented in the Well Construction and Testing, Groundwater Exploration Report, during the construction and testing of four on-site wells, groundwater was measured between 16.7 and 21.5 feet across the site. Associated water quality tests were performed and the water from the wells was found suitable for domestic water supply (Cleath & Associates 2002). Additional baseline information on the groundwater is provided in Section 4.5, Water Resources. 4.6.2 Regulatory Setting 4.6.2.1 Federal Policies and Regulations Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) implements the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 SDWA), the primary federal regulation controlling drinking water quality in every public water system in the United States. The SDWA authorizes the EPA to establish and enforce guidelines for drinking water to protect against both naturally occurring and manmade contaminants. Although Congress initially passed the SDWA in 1974, it amended the law significantly in 1986 and 1996. The Act originally set standards for the treatment of individual constituents, including pesticides, trihalomethanes, arsenic, selenium, radionuclides, nitrates, toxic metals, bacteria, viruses, and pathogens. The amendments to the Act made some significant changes, most of which created more stringent protection of drinking water sources. The amended Act also greatly enhanced the existing law by implementing operator training, funding for water system improvements, and public information as important components of safe drinking water. The Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulates quality standards for surface waters. Under the CWA, the EPA has implemented many pollution control standards for the industry along with water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. The CWA made it unlawful to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless the EPA authorized a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. 4.6.2.2 State Policies and Regulations State Water Resources Control Board The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and its nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) are the principal state agencies with primary responsibility for the coordination and control of water quality. The SWRCB enforces the water quality standards set forth in the Clean Water Act for State of California on behalf of the United States EPA. Most of the SWRCB objectives are based on the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, State Drinking Water Standards. The City lies within Region 3, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. The SWRCB also regulates discharges, including those from septic systems, to ensure long-term water quality protection. The SWRCB authorizes on-site discharges with waste discharge 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR permits. Permit requirements are based upon criteria specified in the Basin Plan Implementation Program, which contains requirements, recommendations, and prohibitions for siting, design, construction, maintenance, and management of on-site wastewater systems. On May 2, 2006, the SWRCB adopted a General Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) for all publically owned sanitary sewer collection systems in California with more than one mile of sewer pipe. The goal of the WDR is to provide a consistent statewide approach for reducing Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO). The WDR requires that in the event of an SSO, all feasible steps to be taken to control the released volume to prevent untreated wastewater from entering storm drains and creeks. The WDR also requires that any SSO is reported to the SWRCB and a Sewer System Management Plan is developed and approved by the collection system's governing body. The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1987 Water Quality in California is governed by the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act of 1987, which assigns overall responsibility for water rights and water quality protection to the SWRCB and requires the SWRCB to develop and enforce water quality standards within California. California has been delegated the authority to issue NPDES permits for all areas within its boundaries, except certain federally designated lands. Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 provides two methods for administratively listing chemicals known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. The first method is if a body considered to be authoritative by state-qualified experts, such as the EPA or FDA, has formally identified the chemical as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity. The second method applies if a state or federal agency has formally required that the chemical be labeled or identified as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity. The criteria for the listing these chemicals is outlined in 22 CCR Section 12902. Groundwater Management Act of 1992 The Groundwater Management Act, commonly referred to as Assembly Bill 3030, provides local public agencies with increased management authority over groundwater resources. Groundwater is a valuable natural resource within California and Assembly Bill 3030 ensures safe production and quality by encouraging local agencies to work cooperatively within their jurisdictions to manage groundwater resources (Water Code Section 10750). 4.6.2.3 Local Policies and Regulations San Luis Obispo County The County of San Luis Obispo encompasses approximately 3,300 square miles of land and has more than 260,000 residents. The San Luis Obispo County Water Resources Division is the County’s management authority to ensure sustainable water uses, reliable water supplies, and better water quality. The Water Resources Division has incorporated the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan, which promotes coordination with state-wide water planning efforts. The County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Division protects the overall health of the community by preventing the disease transmission and exposure to harmful chemicals and 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR microbes in the environment. The San Luis Obispo County Code Title 8, Health and Sanitation, sets forth waste management and septic tank regulations within the County lines. City of San Luis Obispo The City of San Luis Obispo is the sole water purveyor within the City limits, allowing the City to maintain uniformity of water service and distribution standards. The City maintains control over water quality and ensures its consistency with the City's General Plan and Urban Water Management Plan to maintain an efficient long-term supply. The City of San Luis Obispo is also the sole wastewater service provider within the incorporated area of the City. The City Wastewater Collections Division (WWC) oversees the operation and maintenance of the collection system based on the City of San Luis Obispo General Plan and the 2009 Sewer System Management Plan, which complies with the SWRCB’s statewide WDR for sanitary sewer systems. 4.6.3 Significance Criteria The following wastewater impacts would be considered significant if the Project would: Violate waste discharge requirements or Central Coast Basin Plan criteria for wastewater systems - Wastewater impacts would be considered potentially significant if development of the Project would violate waste discharge requirements or the Central Coast Basin Plan Criteria for wastewater systems. Adversely affect the quality of groundwater - Wastewater impacts on groundwater quality would be considered potentially significant if development of the proposed Project would result in the degradation of groundwater water, including point source and non-point source impacts, according to established water quality standards. Adversely affect the quality of surface water or result in flood stage flow of surface water bodies Wastewater impacts on surface water would be considered potentially significant if development of the Project would result in the degradation of surface water quality according to established water quality standards. Wastewater impacts would be considered significant if the release of wastewater to surface water bodies resulted in flood stage flows. Adversely affect the community wastewater service provider - Wastewater impacts would be considered potentially significant if the development of the Project would increase wastewater facility demand beyond the City's existing and future commitments. 4.6.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The remediation and restoration activities associated with the Project would generate limited amount of wastewater from pipeline abandonment and possibly on-site dewatering activities. The remediation and restoration activities associated with the Project would not have impacts on City wastewater infrastructure since no wastewater would be discharged to the City sewers. 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WW.1 The wastewater generated from remediation activities could result in releases to the environment that could impact surface water or groundwater quality. Remediation Class III The remediation activities would result in the excavation of areas of surface hydrocarbon expressions that are a hazard to wildlife. Construction of engineered caps would eliminate potential exposure pathways for human and ecological receptors. The implementation of the proposed Restoration Plan would result in the restoration or replacement of waters of the U.S. and wetlands impacted by the remediation activities. Following the completion of Project remediation and restoration activities, the on-site waters of the U.S. and wetlands would have improved function and values for the various wetland functions identified to occur on-site, including groundwater recharge, nutrient and pollution removal, and flood flow management. The major sources of wastewater during the remediation would be associated with pipeline abandonment activities. The remediation component of the Project has been designed to limit the amount of excavation that would need to occur below the groundwater, which means that dewatering during excavation is not expected to be required. During the remediation activities portable toilets would be used. This waste would be removed from the Project Site via vacuum truck. When operational, the tank farm required numerous pipelines to move oil between the pump house, boilers, tanks, and reservoirs. The site was also served by water, natural gas, and septic pipelines. It is estimated that more than 25,000 feet of oil pipeline were installed on-site. Most of the pipelines still remain in place. The Applicant proposes to abandon most of the pipeline in place. Portions of the pipelines that are within work areas would be removed for disposal, except for the Northwest Operations Area, where the pipelines would be closed in place by pressure- grouting. If a pipeline crosses an environmentally sensitive area (e.g., wetland) and would not otherwise be disturbed by remediation activities, it would also be closed in place by pressure- grouting. All pipelines would be flushed and, if possible, pigged to remove residual hydrocarbon and vapors prior to abandonment in place. If a section of pipeline is in such poor condition that it cannot be adequately cleaned, it would be excavated and removed in its entirety. Water trucks attached to portable pumps would be connected via hose to each pipeline segment within the facility. Additionally, several portable storage tanks or vacuum trucks would be stationed and attached to the pipelines to receive and collect the flush water. Each pipeline segment would be flushed with an adequate volume of water to remove residual oil from the pipelines. Pipeline flushing operations would continue until flush water containing total petroleum hydrocarbons of less than 100 parts per million is achieved. All wastewater from the flushing operations would be collected in tanks and removed from the site via vacuum trucks and hauled to an approved facility for disposal or recycling. For pipelines that are to be removed, all liquids would be drained from the piping into a containment device and would be removed using a vacuum truck and hauled to an approved facility for disposal or recycling. The pipe segments would then be cut into manageable pieces, 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR the pipe ends wrapped in plastic to prevent spillage, the segments removed from the trench, and the trench backfilled. Scrap pipe would be temporarily stored in bins and transported off-site for recycling. Pipelines that are scheduled for abandonment and have diameters greater than 4 inches would be grouted with a cement-slurry to prevent any future ground subsidence from pipe wall collapse. A portable grout pump would be used to pump grout into the pipeline segments. Grout would be pumped until it exits the other end of the pipe segment. Following grouting, the pipeline segment ends would be backfilled with soil and the soil compacted. The excavations that are proposed as part of the remediation component of the Project have been designed to avoid groundwater, which should limit the need for any dewatering as part of the excavations. In the event that dewatering is required a vacuum truck could be used for small volumes. Water from the excavation area would be moved into vacuum trucks and hauled to an approved facility for disposal or recycling. If the amount of dewatering is greater than what can be handled with vacuum trucks, the wastewater would be pumped to a set of skid mounted tanks that would be used to treat the water and then the water would be discharged on site via sprinklers or used for dust control. The on- site reuse of the treated water would require Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The wastewater from the dewatering operations would have to meet the water quality requirements of the RWQCB 2011 Basin Plan before it could be discharged. This would all be addressed in the WDR permit, issued by the RWQCB. As discussed above, most of the wastewater from remediation activities would be collected on- site and transported off-site via vacuum truck to an approved disposal for recycling facility. The only wastewater that might be discharged on-site would be associated with dewatering operation associated with excavations. However, dewatering for the excavations is not expected to be necessary since none of the excavations are expected to reach the level of groundwater. Any wastewater from the dewatering activities that was released at the site would have to meet the RWQCB 2011 Basin Plan requirements and be permitting by the RWQCB. Therefore, impacts associated with the discharge of wastewater from remediation activities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures WW-1a Prior to the discharge of any wastewater from remediation activities, the Applicant shall provide to the County a copy of the WDR from the RWQCB. WW-1b Prior to issuance of grading permits for remediation the Applicant shall prepare a Dewatering Contingency Plan that shall be submitted to the RWQCB for review and approval. The Applicant shall provide to the County a copy of the RWQCB approval letter for the Dewatering Contingency Plan. Residual Impacts The residual impacts would be less than significant (Class III). 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.6.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WW.2 The wastewater generated from the City Development Plan component of the Project would exceed the design capacity of the City’s downstream sewer lines or the capacity of the City’s water reclamation facility. Development Class III If the City Development Plan component of the Project is implemented, the development would occur subsequent to annexation into the City and would therefore utilize the City’s wastewater collection and treatment system. A critical function of a wastewater collection system is to provide adequate capacity to handle peak flows. The City of San Luis Obispo’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) is responsible for treating all of the wastewater (sewage) within the City, California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), and the County airport. The facility treats 4.5 million gallons of wastewater daily based upon dry weather flows. The most recent upgrade to the WRF was completed to improve the quality of water discharged into San Luis Obispo Creek. The WRF has very stringent discharge requirements and now produces a high quality effluent that surpasses drinking water standards for many constituents. The WRF is designed to handle approximately 5.1 million gallons per day based upon dry weather flows. The City completed the Tank Farm Gravity Sewer, Lift Station and Force Main Project that involved the construction of a new regional lift station that is located just west of the Project Site on Tank Farm Road. The upgrade also included the installation of two miles of gravity sewer lines along Tank Farm Road and Broad Street, as well as approximately one mile of a 14-inch force main running north to Prado Road (City 2003b). This upgrade allows for the handling of future development anticipated in the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP), including the 803,000 square feet of development associated with the proposed Project. Table 4.6-1 provides the estimated water use and wastewater generation for the City Development Plan component of the Project by land use. The wastewater would be equal to the total water use minus any water used for irrigation/landscape purposes in a non-drought year. Table 4.6-1 provides the total water demand per proposed land uses as well as the estimated percentage of indoor water use, which was all assumed to be wastewater that would be handled by the City wastewater facilities. The water usage is based upon water use factors provided by City of San Luis Obispo as well as Project land uses. The City Development Plan aspect of the Project would require a water use demand of approximately 117 acre-feet per year (AFY). Landscape/irrigation water use was then estimated using the indoor water use factors provided by the City of San Luis Obispo. Based on these factors, the indoor water use for each proposed land development area was estimated. The projected wastewater generation for the City Development Plan aspect of the Project at complete build out was estimated to be approximately 71 AFY (64,090 gallons per day). 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.6-1 Estimated Wastewater Flows for the City Tank Farm Development Plan, Non-drought Year Land Use Floor Area square feet) Water Use Factor AFY) Water Use Factor Units Annual Water Use AFY) Indoor Use (% of Total) Wastewater Generated AFY) Wastewater Generated gals/day) Light Manufacturing 170,000 0.071 per 1,000 sq. ft. 12.07 90 10.86 9,697 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 0.1 per 1,000 sq. ft. 5.00 70 3.50 3,124 Business Park (Offices) 348,000 0.066 per 1,000 sq. ft. 22.97 70 16.08 14,352 General Retail 15,000 0.008 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.12 80 0.10 86 Vehicle Services -Repair and Maintenance-Major 20,000 0.03 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.60 80 0.48 428 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animal 5,000 0.2 per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.00 90 0.90 803 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 0.071 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.71 90 0.64 570 Printing and Publishing 10,000 0.071 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.71 90 0.64 570 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 0.029 per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.45 80 1.16 1,036 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 0.029 per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.45 80 1.16 1,036 Hotel 70,000 0.43 per guest room 49.45 70 34.62 30,900 Specialized Education/Training Facility 5,000 0.066 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.33 70 0.23 206 Public Transit Maintenance and Storage Facility 10,000 0.023 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.23 70 0.16 144 Public Fire Station and Training Facility 5,000 0.064 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.32 70 0.22 200 Recreational Fields NA 1.4 per acre 21.00 5 1.05 937 Total 818,000 117.41 71.80 64,090 Source: 1. Water Use Factors based on City of SLO Utilities Department. 2. % indoor use numbers adapted from Water Use Factors, San Luis Obispo. 1999. 3. Hotel assumed 115 rooms. 4. Recreational fields assumed to be 15 acres and that 5 percent of the water use is for indoor use. 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City Development Plan would be within the allowable land use designations outlined in the AASP, which designates the developments to be those of services, including business park, service-commercial, public facilities, and open space with the majority of the development occurring on the northeast and northwest portions of the Project Site. According to the AASP, the Specific Plan area has been projected to generate flows of approximately 745,000 gallons per day. Due to the fact the planned land use of the Project Site is part of the AASP, the 64,090 gallons per day of generated flow falls within the anticipated parameters. The proposed Project would convey the generated flow to the existing wastewater sewer line running westerly down Tank Farm Road. The wastewater impacts due to the City Development Plan component of the Project are anticipated to be less than significant due to existing sewer lines, pump station, and WRF are capable of handling the projected flows at build-out. The AASP was developed with the anticipation of the Project Site being developed. The advanced planning, and incorporation into the AASP, has allowed for the projected wastewater generation from the City Development Plan to cause little to no impact to the wastewater facilities. Mitigation Measures The wastewater impacts to the City facilities are anticipated to be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Residual Impacts The residual impacts would be less than significant (Class III). 4.6.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures As part of the County Development Plan component of the Project, wastewater would be treated on-site at a 1.1 acre wastewater treatment facility. The location of the proposed facility is shown in Figure 4.6-1 south of Tank Farm Road. On behalf of the Applicant, WSC, Inc. analyzed the water treatment facility siting and effluent disposal options of the Project Site as part of the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Feasibility Assessment dated February 2011. A copy of this analysis is provided in Appendix A.2 of this EIR . The proposed wastewater facilities would include a gravity collection system, wastewater treatment plant, and on-site re-use and/or disposal systems. To minimize the amount of disposal required, the proposed system would include extensive re-use of the treated effluent on-site for watering, landscaping, and the recreational facilities. 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.6-1 Proposed Location of Wastewater Treatment Facility-County Development Plan 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The proposed wastewater treatment process would include tertiary treatment and disinfection systems sufficient to allow for re-use consistent with California Department of Public Health Title 22 regulations. The proposed concept would also include a recycled water distribution system to deliver recycled water to meet landscape irrigation and a dual plumbing system to meet toilet/urinal flushing demand. The wastewater treatment facility would use one of two methods for treating the water: first, conventional activated sludge; and, second, membrane biologic reactor. Both technologies are suspended growth aerobic treatment processes and are effective for the reduction of biological oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and nitrogen. Appendix A.2 of this EIR provides a detailed description of the proposed wastewater treatment facility. The proposed wastewater treatment assessment described in Appendix A.2 considered numerous effluent disposal options, including leach fields, spray fields, constructed wetlands, polishing wetlands and live stream discharge. The assessment analyzed each option and determined that the two viable effluent disposal options are: (1) polishing wetlands and (2) live stream discharge. Further, Table 4.6-2 provides the estimated water use and wastewater generation for the City Development Plan by land use. The wastewater would be equal to the total water use minus any water used for irrigation/landscape purposes in a non-drought year. Table 4.6-2 provides the total water demand per proposed land uses as well as the estimated percentage of indoor water use, which was all assumed to be wastewater that would be handled by the proposed wastewater treatment plant. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WW.3 Discharges from the wastewater treatment plant would increase surface water flow rates and impact downstream properties. Development Class I The Project includes two effluent disposal options: (1) polishing wetlands and (2) live stream discharge. With the polishing wetlands, the effluent would flow into the existing on-site wetland, into Tank Farm Creek and ultimately be discharged into the upper East Fork of the San Luis Obispo Creek i.e., south of the Project Site where the two creeks converge). Discharge of the blended tertiary treated effluent into the polishing wetland would be highest during the winter months due to the decreased demand for landscape irrigation recycled water. Thus, discharges would mimic natural systems with the higher flows occurring during the wet winter months and minimal to no discharge during the dry summer months due to increased demand for landscape irrigation. 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.6-2 Estimated Wastewater Flows for the County Tank Farm Development, Non-drought Year Land Use Floor Area square feet) Water Use Factor AFY) Water Use Factor Units Annual Water Use AFY) Indoor Use (% of Total) Wastewater Generated AFY) Wastewater Generated gals/day) Light Manufacturing 170,000 0.071 per 1,000 sq. ft. 12.07 90 10.86 9,697 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 0.1 per 1,000 sq. ft. 5.00 70 3.50 3,124 Business Park (Offices) 348,000 0.066 per 1,000 sq. ft. 22.97 70 16.08 14,352 General Retail 15,000 0.008 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.12 80 0.10 86 Vehicle Services -Repair and Maintenance-Major 20,000 0.03 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.60 80 0.48 428 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animal 5,000 0.2 per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.00 90 0.90 803 Business Support Services 10,000 0.071 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.71 90 0.64 570 Printing and Publishing 10,000 0.071 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.71 90 0.64 570 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 0.029 per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.45 80 1.16 1,036 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 0.029 per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.45 80 1.16 1,036 Hotel 70,000 0.43 per guest room 49.45 70 34.62 30,900 Specialized Education/Training Facility 5,000 0.066 per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.33 70 0.23 206 Water Treatment Plant NA 1.4 per acre 1.40 5 0.07 62 Recreational Fields NA 1.4 per acre 21.00 5 1.05 937 Total 803,000 118.26 71.48 63,809 Source: 1. Water Use Factors based on City of SLO Utilities Department. 2. % indoor use numbers adapted from Water Use Factors, San Luis Obispo. 1999. 3. Hotel assumed 115 rooms. 4. Recreational fields assumed to be 15 acres and that 5 percent of the water use is for indoor use. 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR As previously stated, with the live stream discharge option, the effluent from the wastewater treatment plant would be discharged directly into the upper East Fork of the San Luis Obispo Creek just south of the proposed plant and along the eastern boundary of the Project Site. The discharges would mimic natural systems with the higher flows occurring during the wet winter months and minimal to no discharge during the dry summer months due to increased demand for landscape irrigation. Table 4.6-3 provides an estimate of the typical seasonal recycled water supply and demand for non-drought years. As this table shows, in the winter months there would be a need to directly discharge to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. As discussed in the San Luis Obispo Creek Water Management Plan (SLOCWMP) (City 2003a), the upper East Fork of the San Luis Obispo Creek experiences flooding every 25 to 50 years, and the lower East Fork greater than every 50 years. The SLOCWMP defines flooding as when the flows are outside the banks of the creek. Downstream of the proposed wastewater treatment facility discharge point where the East Fork joins the main San Luis Obispo Creek, a number of areas are prone to flooding with a frequency of less than 25 years (City 2003a). Table 4.6-3 Estimated Seasonal Recycled Water Supply and Demand, Wet Year – County Development Option Month Recycle Water Supply (AF) Dual Plumbing Demand (AF) Landscape Irrigation Demand (AF) Surplus (Deficit) Recycled Water Supply (AF) January 5.96 3.39 0.0 2.57 February 5.96 3.39 0.0 2.57 March 5.96 3.39 0.3 2.29 April 5.96 3.39 6.8 (4.19) May 5.96 3.39 7.1 (4.58) June 5.96 3.39 8.2 (5.61) July 5.96 3.39 6.9 (4.33) August 5.96 3.39 6.7 (4.14) September 5.96 3.39 5.7 (3.15) October 5.96 3.39 4.2 (1.67) November 5.96 3.39 0.7 1.84 December 5.96 3.39 0.1 2.45 Annual 71.48 40.65 46.8 (15.94) Source: Adapted from Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Feasibility Assessment, 2011. During peak rain events in the winter the Project would add approximately 27,000 gallons per day to the flow in the creek. The discharge of this continuous flow into the creek may potentially increase flow rates and impact flow velocities which could be detrimental to downstream properties or habitats. These discharges would occur during the winter months and could potentially exacerbate already heavy flows within the nearby creeks and downstream. Given that some of the downstream locations have flooding potential less than every 25 years, this discharge from the wastewater treatment plant during heavy rain events would be considered a significant impact. 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures WW-3 Prior to recordation of a final map, commencement of tract improvements or issuance of the first building permit for the development phase, the Applicant shall receive a wastewater discharge permit from the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Applicant shall also submit, to the County Public Works Department for review and approval, a wastewater discharge plan for the wastewater treatment plant that shall be reviewed and approved by San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building and Public Works. The plan shall include the method that would be used to avoid discharges from the wastewater treatment plant that increase flows to the San Luis Obispo Creek during rain events that could result in increased flooding. The plan shall include at the minimum the following: 1. How creek levels would be monitored during rain events. 2. At what flow and water level in the creek would discharges to the creek be halted. 3. The method used to hold wastewater during periods when it cannot be discharged. Residual Impacts Even with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measure it would be very difficult to assure that discharges from the wastewater treatment plant would not occur during rain events that could result in flooding to downstream areas. Therefore, the impact would be considered significant and unavoidable (Class I). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact WW.4 The wastewater treatment plant discharges would increase pollutants into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Development Class II Two different biologic treatment processes were analyzed for the proposed wastewater treatment facility: first, conventional activated sludge; and, second, membrane biologic reactor. Both technologies are suspended growth aerobic treatment processes and are effective for the reduction of biological oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and nitrogen. Wastewater discharges within California are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency EPA), the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The 1972 Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) directs the EPA to oversee and approve all state water quality standards. The SWRCB oversees nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs); the RWQCBs are responsible for monitoring and enforcing the state and federal plans, policies, and regulations within their regions. The Project Site is located within the jurisdiction of the Central Coast RWQCB (Region 3). Discharging treated wastewater into waters of the state would require a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the RWQCB. Discharges to land, including sprinkler systems, 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR would require a Report of Waste Discharge and potentially the adoption of Waste Discharge Requirements. The Central Coast Region Basin Plan is the master water quality control planning document for the region. It designates beneficial uses and water quality objectives for waters of the state within the Central Coast Region. The Central Coast Region Basin Plan includes Surface Water Quality Objectives (SWQOs) for specific water bodies. The SWQOs are intended to serve as the water quality baseline for evaluating water quality management in the basin. The effluent disposal options for the County Development Plan wastewater treatment facility include direct and indirect discharges into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek, which is designated a water of the state. The CWA requires states to identify water bodies that do not meet water quality objectives and are not supporting their beneficial use. The East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek is included on the Central Coast RWQCB’s CWA list of water quality limited segments (303d list). By placing the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek on the 303d List, the RWQCB has identified specific pollutants that are impairing the water body and require the development of total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). A TMDL is the maximum amount of a pollutant that a body of water can receive while still meeting its water quality objectives. The specific requirements for a TMDL can be a mass loading limit or a maximum concentration limit. Currently, the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek has EPA approved TMDLs for nitrates and pathogens. The TMDL for nitrates is 10mg/L. The TMDL for pathogens is no less than five samples for any 30 day period, shall exceed a log mean of 200 MPN per 100ml, nor shall >10 percent of total samples collected exceed 400 MPN per 100ml. TMDLs for sodium, chlorphyrifos, and chloride are expected to be approved in the near future. Discharges into the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek must comply with existing and potentially future TMDLs. Based on the analysis, each treatment process is capable of producing treated effluent that complies with existing RWQCB regulations for wastewater discharges and existing TMDLs and SWQOs for the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek if the system is properly designed and operated. Both technologies can achieve nitrification and denitrification (NDN), by incorporating an anoxic zone and mixed liquor recycle into the suspended growth reactors to ensure that the treated effluent complies with the TMDL requirements for nitrate (10 mg/L as Nitrogen) at the outlet to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. If the wastewater treatment system is not adequately designed and operated then impacts to water quality in the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek could be significant. Mitigation Measures WW-4a A Registered Civil Engineer shall design the tertiary treatment system for review and approval by the County of San Luis Obispo and State of California RWQCB. WW-4b The tertiary treatment system shall be designed to ensure that the outlet discharge from the treatment facility satisfies and is in compliance with meeting constituent concentration limits outlined in the RWQCB SWQO's. 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR WW-4c A quarterly monitoring program will be established prior to construction. The program shall provide for sampling and testing for all constituent compounds required by the RWQCB SWQO. The testing and monitoring program shall be reviewed and approved by the RWQCB and the County of San Luis Obispo. A Registered Civil Engineer shall perform the quarterly reports that shall be submitted to the RWQCB and the County of San Luis Obispo to ensure compliance. Residual Impacts By requiring the discharge at the outlet from the treatment facility to meet the state and local requirements for constituent compounds, the potential adverse impacts to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek would be reduced or eliminated from exceedance of TMDLs. The regular monitoring program would ensure compliance and identify any system malfunctions or issues. The use of tertiary treatment facilities are well developed and mainstream technology. Therefore, with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, impacts would be deemed less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.6.7 Cumulative Analysis The City Development Plan component of the Project would produce wastewater within the volumes planned for in the Airport Area Specific Plan. The City of San Luis Obispo has adequately planned for the development of the area and has extended the wastewater facilities to incorporate the full proposed build-out. Based on the studies conducted by both the City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department, the City facilities are adequately sized to meet the wastewater demands of the Project. The cumulative impacts of the City Development Plan are less than significant with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. The County Development Plan component of the Project would require the construction of extensive wastewater facilities including an on-site wastewater treatment plant. Such improvements would require the construction of polishing wetlands or a creek discharge plan. The Applicant must comply with various State and local regulations that address protection of water quality discharges. The current technology is readily available to ensure that the treated effluent is capable of complying with existing RWQCB regulations for wastewater discharges and existing TMDLs and SWQOs for the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. Therefore, the cumulative impacts of the County Development Plan are less than significant with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.6.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.6.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party WW-1a Prior to the discharge of any wastewater from remediation activities the Applicant shall provide to the County a copy of the WDR from the RWQCB. Review of permit Prior to any wastewater discharge San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building WW-1b Prior to issuance of grading permits for remediation the Applicant shall prepare a Dewatering Contingency Plan that shall be submitted to the RWQCB for review and approval. The Applicant shall provide to the County a copy of the RWQCB approval letter for the Dewatering Contingency Plan. Review of plan Approval letter Prior to grading permits RWQCB San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building 4.6.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan There are no proposed mitigation measures for wastewater treatment for the City Development Plan. 4.6.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party WW-3 Prior to recordation of a final map, commencement of tract improvements or issuance of the first building permit for the development phase, the Applicant shall receive a wastewater discharge permit from the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Applicant shall also submit, to the County Public Works Department for review and approval, a wastewater discharge plan for the wastewater treatment plant that shall be reviewed and approved by San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building and Public Works. The plan shall include the method that would be used to avoid discharges from the wastewater treatment plant that increase flows to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek during rain events that could result in increased flooding. The plan shall include at the Review of plan Ongoing monitoring Prior to issuance of building permits for wastewater facility County of San Luis Planning and Building and Flood Control 4.6 Wastewater December 2013 4.6-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party minimum the following: 1. How creek levels would be monitored during rain events. 2. At what flow and water level in the creek would discharges to the creek be halted. 3. The method used to hold wastewater during periods when it cannot be discharged. WW-4a A Registered Civil Engineer shall design the tertiary treatment system for review and approval by the County of San Luis Obispo and State of California RWCB. Review of facility design Prior to construction of the wastewater facility County of San Luis Obispo Public Works RWQCB WW-4b The tertiary treatment system design shall be designed to ensure that the outlet discharge from the treatment facility satisfies and is in compliance with meeting constituent concentration limits outlined in the RWQCB SWQO's. Review of facility design Prior to construction of the wastewater facility County of San Luis Obispo Public Works RWQCB WW-4c A quarterly monitoring program will be established prior to construction. The program shall provide for sampling and testing for all constituent compounds required by the RWQCB SWQO. The testing and monitoring program shall be reviewed and approved by the RWQCB and the County of San Luis Obispo. A Registered Civil Engineer shall perform the quarterly reports that shall be submitted to the RWQCB and the County of San Luis Obispo to ensure compliance and any additional mitigations measures that may be required. Plan Review Prior to construction of the wastewater facility Ongoing during operation County of San Luis Obispo Public Works RWQCB 4.6.9 References The Airport Land Use Commission for San Luis Obispo County. 2005. Airport Land Use Plan for the San Luis Obispo Regional Airport. San Luis Obispo, CA: The Airport Land Use Commission for San Luis Obispo County; May 18, 2005. Avocet Environmental, Inc (Avocet). 2009. Hydrology Study. Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. January 26. 2009. Project No. 1212.005. California Coastal Conservancy. 2002. San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed Enhancement Plan, California Coastal Conservancy; January 2002. 4.6 Wastewater Chevron Tank Farm 4.6-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR City of San Luis Obispo (City). 1999. Water Use Factors; 1999. 2003a. San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed Waterway Management Plan, 2003. 2003b. City Council Agenda Report. August 19, 2003. 2002. Environmental Impact Report for the Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related facilities Master Plans, City of San Luis Obispo; 2002. 2011. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. City of San Luis Obispo; June 21, 2011. 2009. Sewer System Management Plan, City of San Luis Obispo; October 2009. 2010. General Plan-Water and Wastewater, City of San Luis Obispo; July 6, 2010. Cleath & Associates. 2003. Preliminary Environmental Impacts Study for Water Resources, Unocal Tank Farm Property, San Luis Obispo County, California. 2003. 2002. Well Construction and Testing, Groundwater Exploration, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Property, San Luis Obispo, California. 2002. Chevron. 2011. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Feasibility Assessment; February 23, 2011. 2007. Final Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Re-development Project. San Luis Obispo, CA: December 20, 2007. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources This section addresses all geologic and soil resources impacts that may be associated with the Project Site, including geologic structure, geomorphology, tectonic setting, existing mineral and ore deposits, and physical geologic properties. Under the proposed Project, the Applicant would develop a portion of the Project Site for commercial and industrial land use and would dedicate the remainder as open space. The Project would be divided into phases. The initial phase would remediate and rehabilitate the Project Site through demolition, soil re-grading, and mitigation of existing petroleum-related soil and groundwater contamination. The next phase would develop the Project Site for commercial use with a business park, and for industrial use with services and manufacturing. The development would be completed either as part of an annexation to the City of San Luis Obispo (City) or as part of the County of San Luis Obispo (County). Major development would be concentrated in the northeastern portion of the site, near Reservoir 4 (refer to Section 2, Project Description, Figure 2-17), and the northwestern portion of the site near existing buildings from the previous tank farm facility (known as the Northwest Operations Area). This section addresses and outlines the geologic setting and geologic impacts relating to the Project Site and the associated remediation and development. Utilizing thresholds of significance, this section assesses the major hazards associated with the existing geological resources for the Project Site and provides mitigation measures to avoid or lessen any significant geological hazards to the Project Site and proposed development. 4.7.1 Environmental Setting 4.7.1.1 Site Description The Project Site is a large, relatively flat 332-acre property that was previously developed for petroleum storage. While the Project Site is generally flat, the northeast portion has some moderately descending slopes. The majority of the Project Site is currently undeveloped and contains native grasslands and both natural wetlands and wetlands from water accumulation in the former oil storage depressions. 4.7.1.2 Regional Geologic Setting The Project Site is within the San Luis Obispo Valley, which lies on the westerly side of the San Lucia Mountains. The San Lucia Mountains are part of the Coast Range physiographic province of California. The Coast Range, extending parallel to the California and Oregon coastlines, is a series of northwest-southeast trending mountain ranges separated by valleys and basins as a result of regional faulting. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Project Site is in the southern portion of the Coast Range Province, appropriately named the South Coast Range. The Coast Range Province is north of the Transverse Range Province, west of the Great Valley Province, and south of the Klamath Mountains Province. The South Coast Range includes a subduction zone complex (Franciscan Assemblage), forearc basin sediments the Great Valley Sequence), and a magmatic arc (plutonic and metamorphic rocks of the Salinian Block) (See Figure 4.7-1). The age of the rocks varies from Mid to Late Mesozoic (160 million years old) to Holocene alluvium (11,000 years old to present day), with a very complex geologic structure due to the abundant faulting and folding from the San Andreas Fault system. 4.7.1.3 Local Geologic Setting The Project Site consists of alluvial deposits of varying thickness overlying a mixture of sedimentary and meta-volcanic deposits from the Franciscan Formation. Serpentinite is a common metamorphic rock in the Franciscan Formation. The alluvium unit ranges in thickness from zero feet in the northwest corner of the property to 180 feet thick in the southwest corner of the property. The alluvial deposits consist of unconsolidated to consolidated conglomerate, gravel, sand, silt, and clay. Locally the Serpentine bedrock is highly fractured and weathered. During the subsurface exploration program, bedrock was only encountered in the northeastern portion of the site, proximal to Reservoir Number 4 (refer to Figure 4.7-2) (Padre 2007). In this area fill depths are on the order of 6 feet. Underlying alluvium depths are on the order of 11 to 29 feet deep. Weathered greywacke sandstone of the Franciscan Assemblage overlies the alluvium in the northeastern portion of the Project Site. In the northeastern corner of the Project Site, where fill and alluvium are absent, there are moderately steep descending slopes of Franciscan Assemblage outcrops. No bedrock was encountered in any other portion of the site as the drill holes and test pits for the northwestern and southern portions of the site only found fill and alluvium. Alluvium depths were observed to be greater than 10 feet in the southern portion of the site within the Reservoir Number 3 (refer to Figure 4.7-2) area and greater than 36 feet in the northwestern portion where existing buildings and structures from the original tank farm are located. As part of the Geotechnical Feasibility study, exploratory borings and excavated test pits were drilled (Padre 2007). A total of nine hollow stem borings were drilled, and ten test pits were excavated as part of the consultant geotechnical study. The subsurface investigation was focused within the northeastern, northwestern, and southern portion of the Project Site. Subsurface data was limited for the open space along the central northern portion of the site. The site investigations indicated that the subject site is underlain by artificial fill, alluvium, and Franciscan bedrock. During the investigation, petroleum hydrocarbons were observed on the surface and within subsurface earth materials at the Project Site. According to the Geotechnical Feasibility study, free phase heavy petroleum hydrocarbons were observed in all of the following areas (see Figure 4.7-2): Reservoir Number 3 on the ground surface and subsurface to a depth approximately 10 feet; Reservoir Number 4 at the base of the artificial fill as well as within the underlying alluvium and fractured Franciscan Assemblage rock to total depths of approximately 30 feet. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.7-1 Regional Geologic Map Source: Dibblee 2004 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.7-2 Boring Location Map Source: Padre Associates, Inc. 2007 Free phase light end hydrocarbons were observed at the Northwest Operations Area in drill holes PDH-7, PDH-8, and PDH-9 to total depths of 6 to 20 feet. Artificial Fill: The artificial fill consists of dark grey brown to dark brown to black sandy to silty clay. The fill material is stiff to very stiff, damp, and contains some iron oxide staining and mottling. Based on the subsurface investigation, fill accumulations are concentrated in the areas of the remnant man-made petroleum storage facilities. In these reservoirs, fill depths are on the order of 5 to 7 feet deep (Padre 2007). Alluvium: The alluvium consists of medium dense to dense, interlayered, clay, silt, sand and gravel of varying thicknesses. The alluvium deposits vary in thickness from zero feet in the northeast corner of the Project Site to 180 feet in the southwest corner (Avocet 2007). Bedrock was only encountered in the northeastern portion of the site, where alluvium thicknesses were on the order of 15 to 25 feet (Padre 2007). The very northeast corner of the site consists of slopes with outcropping Franciscan Formation. The alluvium overlies a mélange of sedimentary and meta-volcanic rock derived from the Fransican Formation. Bedrock: The bedrock across the site consists of Jurassic/Cretaceous aged deposits of the Franciscan Formation. The Franciscan Assemblage consists of metamorphosed marine sedimentary and mafic volcanic rock. The subsurface site investigation observed greenish grey to olive brown weathered mélange and greywacke. Secondary mineralization of serpentenite was 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR also observed. Fractured and weathered serpentinite is common locally to the Franciscan Formation. Based on the field observations identified in the Geotechnical Feasibility Study, the exposed Franciscan Assemblage in the northeast corner consisted of greenish gray to olive brown, hard, vitreous to greasy, shear and fractured, serpentenized mélange with secondary mineralization of quartz and gypsum (Padre 2007). 4.7.1.4 Geologic Hazards Seismic Hazards The Project Site is located within the seismically active area of Southern California, but outside an Earthquake Study Zone defined by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Hazards Act of 1972. In addition, the site is located outside the active portion of the Los Osos fault delineated as an AP Special Studies Zone by CDMG. The type and magnitude of the seismic hazard affecting the site are dependent on the distance and causative faults and the intensity and magnitude of the seismic event. Seismic hazards can be divided into two general categories: hazards due to ground rupture and hazards associated with ground shaking Potential for Ground Rupture In general terms, an earthquake is caused when strain energy in rocks is suddenly released by movement along a plane of weakness. In some cases, fault movement propagates upward through the subsurface materials and causes displacement at the ground surface as a result of differential movement. Surface rupture usually occurs along traces of known or potentially active faults, although many historic events have occurred on faults not previously known to be active. Seismicity within this region is a result of the dominantly reverse-slip regime of the region. The California Geologic Survey (CGS) establishes criteria for faults as active, potentially active or inactive. Active faults are those that show evidence of surface displacement within the last 11,000 years (Holocene age). Potentially active faults are those that demonstrate displacement within the past 1.6 million years (Quaternary age). Faults showing no evidence of displacement within the last 1.6 million years may be considered inactive for most structures, except for critical or certain life structures. In 1972 the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act (now known as the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Act, 1994, or APEHA) was passed into law which requires studies within 500 feet of active or potentially active faults. The APEHA designs active” and “potentially active” faults utilizing the same age criteria as that used by the CGS. However, the established policy is to zone active faults and only those potentially active faults that have a relatively high potential for ground rupture. Ground rupture caused by movement along a fault could likely result in catastrophic structural damage to buildings constructed along the fault trace. Consequently, the State of California via the APEHA prohibits the construction of occupied “habitable” structures within the designated fault zone and must demonstrate that the structure does not encroach on a 50-foot setback from the fault trace. Per the Alquist-Priolo (AP) legislation, no structure for human occupancy is permitted on the trace of an active fault. The term “structure for human occupancy” is defined as any structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering any use or occupancy, which is expected to have a human occupancy rate of more than 2,000 person-hours per year. Unless 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR proven otherwise, an area within 50 feet of an active fault is presumed to be underlain by active branches of the fault. Local government agencies may identify additional faults, in addition to those faults mandated by the state, for which minimum construction setback requirements must be maintained. Several active and potentially active faults are located in the region. Table 4.7-1 illustrates the 10 nearest faults with distance in miles between the nearest point on the fault and the Project Site, the maximum magnitude, estimated peak ground accelerations and the slip rate. Table 4.7-1 Partial List of Nearby Regional Faults Fault Name Source Type Distance Between Site and Surface Projection of Earthquake Rupture (Miles) Estimated Maximum Peak Ground Acceleration g) Estimated Maximum Earthquake MW) Slip Rate mm/yr) Fault Type Los Osos B 1.3 0.983 6.8 0.50±0.40 DS San Luis Range (S. Margin) B 4.4 0.715 7.0 0.20±0.10 DS Rinconada B 9.3 0.421 7.3 1.00±1 SS Hosgri B 14.0 0.320 7.3 2.50±1 SS Casmalia B 21.7 0.188 6.5 0.25±0.20 DS Lions Head B 25.7 0.163 6.6 0.02±0.02 DS San Juan B 29.2 0.135 7.0 1.00±1 SS San Andreas - Cholame A 37.8 0.094 6.9 34±0.30 SS San Andreas – 1857 Rupture A 38.7 0.170 7.8 34±5 SS Los Alamos – W. Baseline B 40.3 0.110 6.8 0.70±0.70 SS Source: EQFAULT, Ver. 3.0 In addition to the faults listed in Table 4.7-1, other large faults in the Southern California area have the potential to impact the Project Site. It should be understood that the exact prediction of future fault rupture is impossible and the lists are based on previously encountered faults or ground rupture. For instance, the 1994 Northridge Earthquake did not cause fault ground rupture but was a significant regional event. The Project Site is not located within an AP Earthquake Fault Zone. Potential for Ground Shaking The energy released during an earthquake propagates from its rupture surface in the form of seismic waves. The resulting strong ground motion from the seismic wave propagation can cause significant damage to structures. At any location, the intensity of the ground motion is a function of the distance to the fault rupture, the local soil/bedrock conditions, and the earthquake magnitude. Intensity is usually greater in areas underlain by unconsolidated material than in areas underlain by more competent rock. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Earthquakes are characterized by a moment magnitude, which is quantitative measure of the strength of the earthquake based on strain energy released during the event. The magnitude is independent of the site, but is dependent on several factors including the type of fault, rock-, and stored energy. Moderate to severe ground shaking would be experienced in the area of the Project Site if a large magnitude earthquake occurs on one of the nearby principal late Quaternary faults and may cause structural damage to the on-site improvements. Table 4.7-1 also presents peak ground accelerations anticipated for the ten nearest faults. Ground shaking is primarily a function of the distance between a particular area and the seismic source, the type of materials underlying the site and the motion of fault displacement. In addition, the Northridge (1994) earthquake showed how peculiarities in basin effects could play a significant role in ground accelerations at particular areas. For instance, ground accelerations exceeding 1.0 g were recorded at areas far from the epicenter of the Northridge earthquake. Seismic analysis for the purposes of this study is based on a “Design Basis Earthquake Ground Motion” which would have a 10 percent probability of exceedance in a particular 50-year period, corresponding to a return interval of 475 years (CDMG 1996). Detailed discussions of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) and Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (DSHA) are presented in CDMG Reports (CDMG 1996). Extensive references of the available literature are presented in these references. The Southern California Earthquake Center indicates that local, possibly unknown or unrecognized surface faults present higher earthquake risks than known, large regional faults for most areas of Southern California that may generate ground accelerations in excess of 1.0 g The number or frequency of large magnitude earthquakes that may occur during the life of the Project cannot be predicted reliably. However, it is probable that the study area would experience at least one major earthquake during the next 50 years. The potential hazards or adverse effects of ground shaking would depend on several factors that include the severity of ground shaking; the nature, depth, and extent of the seismic event; the type of structures involved; and the local topography. Based on the observable effects from several events, including the Northridge Earthquake (1994), San Fernando Earthquake (1971), Loma Prieta Earthquake (1989) and the Alaska Earthquake (1964), building foundations may fail resulting in excessive building settlement or collapse; underground tanks or buried utilities may be prone to uplift or failure; and access roadways may become blocked or impassable, preventing emergency vehicles from accessing the sites. In addition, broken utility lines could result in fires, inhibit or contaminate water supplies, and cut off services to the residences and structures. Vertical Ground Motions: No suitable empirical method has been developed to analyze vertical ground accelerations. Borzorgnia et al. determined that near-field seismic events, ratios could exceed the horizontal motions (1995). Subsequent recent studies determined that at close distances and for large earthquakes, the peak vertical accelerations can be about 1.6 times the peak horizontal acceleration (Borzorgnia et al. 1999). 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Secondary Seismic Hazards from Groundshaking. Potential hazards resulting from the secondary effects of groundshaking include: liquefaction, lateral spreading, seismic settlement, and landslide-induced earthquakes. Liquefaction. Seed (1979) defined liquefaction as a condition where a soil would undergo continued deformation at constant low residual stress or with low residual resistance, due to the buildup and maintenance of high pore water pressures, which reduce the effective confining pressure to a very low value. Pore pressure buildup leading to liquefaction may be due either to static or cyclic stress applications and the possibility of its occurrence would depend on the void ratio or relative density of sand and the confining pressure. It may also be caused by a critical hydraulic gradient during an upward flow of water in a sand deposit. Other factors include but are not limited to: Magnitude and proximity of the earthquake; Duration of shaking; soil types; Grain size distribution; clay fraction content; density; Angularity; Effective overburden; Cyclic loading; and Soil stress history. Liquefaction is more likely in poorly-graded, saturated, low-density sands. With increasing overburden, density and increasing clay-content, the likelihood of liquefaction decreases. In regards to clay content, recent studies over the past ten years have demonstrated that clays with certain properties can be prone to liquefaction and thus the “Chinese Method” is not reliable, and therefore, both sand and clay deposits are herein evaluated and screened. The semi-empirical field-based methods (Idriss & Boulanger 2006), which evolved from the simplified procedure by Seed and Idriss (1983) are by far the most widely used methods in assessing the cyclic liquefaction potential of sand. The simplified procedure has two essential components: An analytical framework to organize past case history experiences; and A suitable in situ index to represent soil liquefaction characteristics (Idriss & Boulanger 2006). In situ penetration tests have proved to be useful for representing soil liquefaction characteristics because they not only provide an indication of denseness, but also reflect other important characteristics such as fabric, gradation, cementation, age, and stress history (Seed 1983). The simplified procedure provides a boundary curve that separates cases of observed liquefaction and those with no notable liquefaction in a two-dimensional plot of seismic loading, in terms of Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) versus a normalized in situ index test value. The boundary curve also serves as a correlation between the in situ index test value and the Cyclic Resistance Ratio CRR). The term CRR may be considered as the maximum CSR that a soil can resist before liquefying. Traditionally, the result of the liquefaction potential analysis using the simplified procedure is presented in terms of a factor of safety (Fs) defined as the ratio of CRR over CSR. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR No soil liquefaction is predicted if Fs > 1. The assessment of liquefaction potential in terms of factor of safety is generally known as the deterministic approach. Based on the County of San Luis Obispo Safety Element Liquefaction Hazard map, the Project Site lies within an area considered to have high liquefaction hazard potential (SLO 1999). Additionally, field exploration indicated the presence of shallow groundwater and the presence of granular soils, which suggests an increased potential for liquefaction. However, on-site investigation and soil testing did not perform a liquefaction analysis to assess liquefaction. Lateral Spreading. Lateral spread is the finite, lateral displacement of sloping ground (0.1 to < 6 percent) as a result of pore pressure buildup or liquefaction in a shallow, underlying soil deposit during an earthquake. Lateral spreading, as a result of liquefaction, occurs when a soil mass slides laterally on a liquefied layer, and gravitational and inertial forces cause the layer, and the overlying non-liquefied material, to move in a downslope direction. The magnitude of lateral spreading movements depends on earthquake magnitude, distance between the site and the seismic event, thickness of the liquefied layer, ground slope or ratio of free-face height to distance between the free face and structure, fines content, average particle size of the materials comprising the liquefied layer, and the standard penetration rates of the materials. Widespread lateral spreading is generally not applicable to fine-grained soils, nor to sandy soils where: Standard penetration values [(N1)60] are greater than 15; and Where the standard penetration rates are less than 15 and the potentially vulnerable layer is less than 1 meter thick. Further, the magnitude of ground displacement in a liquefaction failure is influenced by the volumetric response of these sandy soils during liquefaction. A contractive soils response can lead to very dramatic failures while a dilative response tends to limit the magnitude of displacements. Therefore, a low confining pressure can result in a dilative behavior, even for a somewhat loose packing of soil grains. A potentially significant phenomenon in a lateral spread is the upward flow of pore water within the liquefied soils deposits without a change in the overall volume. In a liquefied state, individual grains tend to sink under the influence of gravity. The net result is for the liquefied soil in a layer to progressively densify near the bottom and loosen/soften near the top. Therefore, there is a tendency for an upward migration of pore water and void space. Lateral spread may occur over looser, weaker soil near the top of the liquefied deposit. If the liquefied soils is overlain with a relatively impervious layer, upward slowing pore water would be trapped and contribute to the formation of a weaker soil zone in the top portion of the liquefied deposit. Since the movement of water and soil grains takes time, this phenomenon might develop in relatively thin layers, but not throughout the depth of thick liquefied deposits. However, even in thick, uniform soil deposits, the tendency for soil grains to settle would result in formation of a progressively, slightly weaker soil toward the top of the liquefied deposit. However, it is important to note that the general analysis assumes conservatively, undrained conditions (Seed 1983). However, the migrations of pore water in a partially drained condition 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR have a significant impact on the magnitude of displacements in the lateral spread. Stark (1994) found that partial drainage of excess pore pressures can produce an increase in shear resistance as sliding progresses. Rapid drainage of excess pore pressures from the liquefied soil zone may be sufficient to stabilize the slide before large deformations occur. Numerous researchers have consistently observed a correlation between horizontal surface displacements in a lateral spread and the thickness of the underlying liquefied soil deposit Yasuda et al. 1992a; Tokida et al. 1993; Hamada et al. 1986; Bartlett and Youd 1992a, 1992b, 1995; O’Rourke and Pease 1997). The influences of the liquefied thickness are as follows: Since shear deformations occur across the full depth of the liquefied deposits, the net surface displacement would increase the greater liquefied thickness. If the shear strain was constant with depth, the lateral displacement profile would be linear and, for a given shear strain, the net surface displacement would increase with liquefied thickness. As the thickness of the liquefied soil deposit increases, a greater upward migration of pore water might occur. Then, the significance of the resulting soft zone near the top of the deposits would increase with increasing liquefied thickness. The drainage path for excess pore pressures increases with the thickness of the liquefied soil. As a result, portions of a thicker liquefied deposit would remain liquefied for a longer period of time and cause greater surface displacements. Horizontal displacements in a lateral spread can range up to several meters with smaller associated settlements. Characteristic patterns or ground deformation include ground fissures or tension cracks at the head of the slide. Subsidence typically occurs at the head of a lateral spread with heaving at the toe. Sand boils, a common indication of soil liquefaction, are frequently observed in the lower portions of a lateral spread. Lateral spread is defined here to include only lateral sliding of gently sloping ground due to soil liquefaction at relatively shallow depths and does not refer to the large horizontal slows associated with deep-seated liquefaction failures. This definition of lateral spread also specifically excludes two types of liquefaction-induced ground failure that can produce similar patterns of surface movements. These types of slumping or embankments and tilting of retaining walls have a genetic failure mechanism involving rotational slide or slumping (Varnes 1978). Seismic Settlement. Seismic settlement occurs when cohesionless materials (sands) densify as a result of ground shaking. Settlement of medium-dense sands could result from a strong earthquake even if groundwater did not rise and groundshaking did not induce liquefaction. The analysis divides the soil deposit into very thin layers and calculates the settlement for each layer. The calculations are divided into two parts, dry soil settlement and saturated soil settlement. The soil above the groundwater table is dry soil and soil below the groundwater table is saturated soil. The total settlement at a certain depth is the sum of the settlements of the saturated and dry soil. The low to moderate in-situ densities in the sandy soils would provide an initial indication that the portion of the site underlain by alluvium may be prone to seismic settlement. Ground Lurching. Ground lurching occurs as a result of earthquake wave front striking stream banks, artificial embankments, bluffs and other geomorphic features at right angles resulting in 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR yielding of the materials in the unsupported direction. The initial affect is to produce a series of more or less parallel cracks separating the ground into blocks. With increasing intensity, lurch cracking develops ground fractures, cracks, and fissures, as well as, settlement, compaction, and sliding. Earthquake-Induced Landslides. Hazards to the improvements of the Project Site include earthquake-induced landsliding, and rock topple. In general, the state of California has been identified to be in an area prone to seismic hazard in mountain areas. Rock topple can occur when loose blocks of exposed bedrock are induced to move and travel downslope when set free by earthquake forces, undermining of supporting earth from erosion or animal disturbance. Generally, slopes with a gradient of greater than 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) are more susceptible to rock topple and rolling. Wilson and Keefer (1985) have reported that a ground acceleration of at least 0.10 g in steep terrain is necessary to induce earthquake-related rock falls, although exceeding this value does not guarantee that rock falls would occur. Only the northeastern corner of the site maintains any major descending slopes. 4.7.1.5 Geotechnical Hazards Expansive Soils Expansive soils swell or heave with increases in moisture content and shrink with decreases in moisture content. Montmorillontic clays are most susceptible to expansion. Foundations for structures constructed on expansive soils require special design considerations (CBC 2010). In general on-site soil deposits consist of silty and sandy clay. Hydroconsolidation Hydroconsolidation occurs when soil layers collapse (settle) when water is added under loads. Natural deposits susceptible to hydroconsolidation are typically aeolian, alluvial, or colluvial materials, with high apparent strength when dry. The dry strength of the materials may be attributed to the clay and silt constituents in the soil and the presence of cementing agents (i.e., salts). Capillary tension may tend to act to bond soil grains. Once these soils are subjected to excessive moisture and foundation loads, the constituency, including soluble salts or bonding agents, is weakened or dissolved, capillary tensions are reduced and collapse occurs, resulting in settlement. Subsidence Subsidence is the sinking of the ground surface caused by the compression of soil layers. The causes range from groundwater, oil and gas withdrawal, oxidation of organics, or the placement of additional fill over compressible layers. Subsidence involves deep seated settlement caused by the compression of soil layers due to the withdrawal of fluid (e.g., oil, natural gas, and water.). The settlement can be exacerbated by increased loading, such as from the construction of on-site buildings or the placement of additional fill over compressible layers. Settlement can also result solely from human activities including improperly placed artificial fill, and structures built on soils or bedrock materials with differential settlement rates. This settlement can be mitigated prior to development through the removal and recompaction of loose soils 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Existing Fill Uncontrolled artificial fills are considered to be unsuitable for support of structures and other improvements. This is typically due to any number of reasons, which include but are not limited to: high voids which may collapse or consolidate upon loading; high organics which decay leaving additional voids or high moisture soils which compress; inconsistent mixtures of fills which may perform differently, changes in consistency over short spans which leads to differential settlement; uneven expansion potential which may result in differential movement of foundation elements; lack of proper benching which may lead to fill creep; and numerous other conditions. Older controlled fills tend to be prone to hydroconsolidation, excessive settlements or creep. This is a result in the change of compaction methods and efforts (i.e., three layer method versus five layer method for maximum density determinations), experience in keyways, subdrains, benching and many other factors. In addition, older fills may tend to lose integrity due to several factors including bioturbation, organic material decay, shrink swell cycles, and other mechanisms that adversely affect the fills. Therefore, the custom and practice in the industry typically dictates that these types of fills not be relied on for structural support of foundations or slabs. Typical mitigations range from total removal to specially designed structural elements or in-situ treatments. Dam Inundation The Project Site is located in the vicinity of several major reservoirs including Lake Santa Margarita (Salinas Dam) and Lopez Lake (Lopez Canyon and Lopez Terminal Dams). Though, based on the County of San Luis Obispo Dam Inundation Map (SLO 1999), the projected extents of flood inundation limits are outside the Project Site location. Naturally Occurring Asbestos Asbestos is a term used for several types of naturally occurring silicate minerals that occur as asbestiform fibers that are a human health hazard when airborne. Asbestos is a known carcinogen and inhalation may result in the development of lung cancer or mesothelioma. Chrysotile and amphibole asbestos are common to geologic settings in California. Serpentinite may contain chrysotile asbestos, especially near fault zones. Ultramafic rock, a rock closely related to serpentinite, may also contain asbestos minerals. Asbestos was identified as a toxic air contaminant by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in 1986 (see Section 4.1, Air Quality). Serpentinite and ultramafic rocks release asbestos when crushed or broken. Asbestos can be released to the atmosphere due to construction and grading projects, quarry activity, traffic on unpaved roads, etc. Natural weathering and erosion processes can also act on asbestos-bearing rock and make it easier for asbestos fibers to become airborne if such rock is disturbed. Compressible Soils Compressible soils consist of low density clays and silts that are prone to high strain rates resulting in consolidation of the layers with reduced groundwater levels or increased fill or foundation loading. Consolidation is a process by which soils decrease in volume. It occurs when stress is applied to a soil that causes the soil particles to pack together more tightly, therefore reducing its bulk volume. When this occurs in a soil that is saturated with water, water (and air) would be squeezed out of the soil. The magnitude of consolidation can be predicted by many different methods. In the Classical Method, developed by Karl von Terzaghi, soils are tested with 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR an oedometer test to determine their compression index. This can be used to predict the amount of consolidation. When stress is removed from a consolidated soil, the soil would rebound, regaining some of the volume it had lost in the consolidation process. If the stress is reapplied, the soil would consolidate again along a recompression curve, defined by the recompression index. The soil which had its load removed is considered to be overconsolidated. This is the case for soils which have previously had thicker sediment overburdern or more commonly been subjected to expansion pressures. The highest stress that it has been subjected to is termed the preconsolidation stress. The over consolidation ratio (OCR) is defined as the highest stress experienced divided by the current stress. A soil which is currently experiencing its highest stress is said to be normally consolidated and to have an OCR of one. A soil could be considered underconsolidated immediately after a new load is applied, but before the excess pore water pressure has had time to dissipate. In addition to estimating the magnitude or primary and secondary consolidation is the time rate for consolidation to occur. Time rates can range from short temporal periods (almost instantaneous) to years. This is especially true in saturated clays because their hydraulic conductivity is extremely low, and this causes the water to take an exceptionally long time to drain out of the soil. While drainage is occurring, the pore water pressure is greater than normal because it is carrying part of the applied stress (as opposed to the soil particles). Slope Stability and Landslides Landslides are downslope motions of conglomerations of earth materials, bedrock, or combinations of both. Landslides are a more defined unit and are similar to slumps, but are on a larger scale. They can move in a translational movement or rotational settlement or motion. It occurs because of the loss of ability of earth materials to maintain their integrity at a specific gradient and settle or into lesser gradient or position of greater equilibrium. The internal strength of the material is lost and the material settles into a form where the mass is centralized on the downhill side of motion. The material is a cohesively connected unit that settles or moves as a unit. Landslides are usually associated with water increasing the unit weight and decreasing the internal strength of the materials. The chance of a landslide occurring are increased by increases in slope gradient, looseness of materials, unfavorable bedding (out of slope), clay content of the bedrock, underground springs, unfavorable slope orientation with existing fault boundaries, human disturbance of the landslide area or its boundaries, increases in groundwater, earthquake forces helping to mobilize the mass, looseness of materials insitu, increases in water content and disturbance of the lateral confining forces and/ or the toe of a slope. Slope Deformation A cursory evaluation of seismic displacement has been provided to give an order of magnitude estimate to the amount of displacement that could be expected in response to a range of median peak horizontal ground accelerations. Newmark's method treats a landslide or sliding block as a rigid-plastic body (i.e., the mass does not deform internally), experiences no permanent displacement at accelerations below the critical or yield level, and deforms plastically along a discrete basal shear surface when the critical acceleration is exceeded. Other assumptions in the analysis include: The static and dynamic shearing resistance of the soil is taken to be the same; The effects of dynamic pore pressure are neglected; 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The critical acceleration is not strain dependent and thus remains constant throughout the analysis; The upslope resistance to sliding is taken to be infinitely large such that displacement is prohibited. The Newmark’s sliding block analysis for estimating seismic displacements requires an initial estimate of the yield acceleration for a selected cross section. The yield acceleration is the horizontal seismic force required to produce a safety factor of 1.0. 4.7.2 Regulatory Setting 4.7.2.1 Federal Regulations Federal Soil Conservation Law (Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1936) 16 UCS 590a] This policy of Congress is to provide permanently for the control and prevention of soil erosion and in turn preserving natural resources, control floods, prevent impairment of reservoirs, maintain navigability of rivers and harbors, protect public health and public lands, and relieve unemployment. The purpose of this law is to preserve and improve soil fertility, promote the economic use and conservation of land, diminish the exploitation, and wasteful and unscientific use of national soil resources, protect rivers and harbors against soil erosion, and prevent and abate agricultural related pollution. Clean Water Act Section 402 (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program) This act requires that construction activities comply with the USEPA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. The NPDES program for the Project Site is enforced by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) through the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in San Luis Obispo County. Under the program, a permit must be obtained by complying with and implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) for erosion control and stormwater management. The General Construction Activities Permit is the basic regulatory instrument of the Clean Water Act. 4.7.2.2 State Policies and Regulations Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (1972) This act provides for the adoption of zoning laws and regulations for cities and counties to implement in order to prohibit the location of developments and structures for human occupancy across the trace of an active fault. In turn, the state releases a series of maps delineating these zones based on geologic studies and research on fault zones throughout California. California Building Code (2010) The California Building Code (CBC) establishes the minimum standards for building and construction design. The CBC is derived from the Uniform Building Code (UBC) but due to the geologic conditions unique to California, the CBC was created as a modified version to account for these conditions such as seismic considerations. The CBC encompasses all phases of 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR construction including specifications and regulations on design, grading and drainage, and construction safety. 4.7.2.3 Local Policies and Regulations City of San Luis Obispo General Plan Safety Element (2000; revised 2012) According to California Government Code Section 65302(g), the adoption of a Safety Element is required in all city and county general plans in order to protect the communities from any unreasonable risks associated with the effects of seismic, geologic, flooding or wild fires hazards. In compliance with section 65302(g), the City of San Luis Obispo has adopted Chapter 5 (Safety) of its 2006 General Plan. The Safety Element focuses on achieving acceptable levels of flood, fire, seismic, geologic, and other risks through decisions on land use and the form of development through planning as well as standards for population density and building intensity. The following City policies are applicable to earthquake and geologic safety considerations. Policy S 5.5: Avoiding Faults Development shall not be located atop known faults. Applications for the following types of discretionary approvals within 100 meters (330 feet) of any fault that is previously known or discovered during site evaluation shall be subject to review and recommendation by a state- registered engineering geologist: change to more intensive land-use; subdivision into five or more parcels; development of multifamily, commercial, industrial, or institutional buildings. Policy S 5.6: Avoiding Slope Instability Development shall not be located on or immediately below unstable slopes, or contribute to slope instability. Any development proposed in an area or moderate or high landslide potential shall be subject to review and recommendation by a state-registered engineering geologist. Policy S 5.7: Avoiding Liquefaction Hazards Development may be located in areas of high liquefaction potential only if a site-specific investigation by a qualified professional determines that the proposed development would not be at risk of damage from liquefaction. The Chief Building Official may waive this requirement upon determining that previous studies in the immediate area provide sufficient information. Policy S 10.0: Avoiding and Mitigating Hazards Policy S 10.0 states that development, including access and utility systems, shall be directed away from hazardous areas, which should be designated for appropriate open space or park uses. Where development, including access and utility systems, cannot avoid hazardous areas, the development shall adequately mitigate the hazards. Hazard mitigation measures shall not significantly impact the environment, including wildlife habitats and views. Development shall pay an equitable share of the costs to mitigate area wide hazards. Hazard mitigation measures shall not burden taxpayers with high maintenance costs. Development shall not increase hazards for other properties in area. Policy S 10.18: Safety of Structures and Facilities Existing and new structures and facilities should reflect adopted safety standards. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR County of San Luis Obispo General Plan Safety Element (1999) The following County policies are applicable to earthquake and geologic safety considerations. Policy S-17: Fault Information Policy S-17 states that the County will enforce the General Plan and applicable building codes that require developments, structures, and public facilities to address geologic and seismic hazards through the preparation and approval of geotechnical and geologic reports. Appointment of a County Geologist will improve implementation of the goals, policies, programs and standards of this Element by assuring more objective review and consistent enforcement of hazard mitigation measures county-wide than is possible under the present system of project review. Policy S-18: Fault Rupture Hazards Policy S-18 states that the County will locate new development away from active and potentially active faults to reduce damage from fault rupture. Fault studies may need to include mapping and exploration beyond project limits to provide a relatively accurate assessment of a fault’s activity. The County will enforce applicable regulations of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act pertaining to fault zones to avoid development on active faults. Policy S-19: Reduce Seismic Hazards Policy S-19 states that the County will enforce applicable building codes relating to the seismic design of structures to reduce the potential for loss of life and reduce the amount of property damage. Policy S-20: Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Policy S-20 states that the County will require design professionals to evaluate the potential for liquefaction or seismic settlement to impact structures in accordance with the currently adopted Uniform Building Code. Policy S-21: Slope Instability Policy S-21 states that the County acknowledges that areas of known landslide activity are generally not suitable for residential development. The County will avoid development in areas of known slope instability or high landslide risk when possible, and continue to encourage that developments on sloping ground use design and construction techniques appropriate for those areas. Policy S-22: Readiness and Response Policy S-22 states that fire and law enforcement agencies will maintain and improve their ability to respond to seismic emergencies throughout the County. County of San Luis Obispo General Plan COSE (2010) The following County policies are applicable to soils considerations. Policy SL 1.1 Prevent Loss of Topsoil in All Land Uses Policy SL 1.1 states that the County will minimize the loss of topsoil by encouraging broad- based cooperation between property owners, agricultural operators, agencies, and organizations that will lead to effective soil conservation practices on all lands, including County-controlled properties. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Policy SL 1.2 Promote Soil Conservation Practices in All Land Uses Policy SL 1.2 states that the County will require erosion and sediment control practices during development or other soil-disturbing activities on steep slopes and ridgelines. These practices should disperse stormwater so that it infiltrates the soil rather than running off, and protect downslope areas from erosion. Policy SL 1.3 Minimize Erosion Associated with New Development Policy SL 1.3 states that the County will avoid development, including roads and driveways, on the steeper portions of a site except when necessary to avoid flood hazards, protect prime soils, and protect sensitive biological and other resources. Avoid grading and site disturbance activities on slopes over 30 percent. Minimize site disturbance and protect existing vegetation as much as possible. Policy SL 2.1 Protect Watersheds and Aquifer Recharge Areas Policy SL 2.1 states that the County will give high priority to protecting watersheds, aquifer- recharge areas, and natural drainage systems when reviewing applications for discretionary development. A preliminary analysis of the project’s consistency with applicable geological plans and polices is provided in Appendix E. 4.7.3 Significance Criteria The CEQA Guidelines delineate that a substantial adverse impact would occur if the Project would expose people or structures to major geologic hazards. In turn, this recognizes any and all unstable geologic and geotechnical conditions as a result of both construction as well as hazards associated with earthquakes, ground shaking, ground movement, fault rupture, groundwater, and other hazards, features, or events. In terms of construction, significant adverse impacts are determined based on whether construction of the project would generate unstable geologic conditions lasting beyond the short-term construction phase. In accordance with Appendix G to the State CEQA Guidelines, a project could have a potentially significant geology and soils impact if it were to cause one or more of the following conditions: 1. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; b. Strong seismic ground shaking; c. Seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction; d. Landslides. 2. Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil; 3. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse; 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in California Building Code (2007), creating substantial risks to life or property; 5. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater; In addition, the Project would also result in a significant geotechnical impact if it exceeds the following threshold: A project would normally have a significant geologic hazard impact if it would cause or accelerate geologic hazards which would result in substantial damage to structures or infrastructure, or expose people to substantial risk of injury. The proposed Project’s impact is considered potentially significant if it would expose people or structures to major geologic hazards. Therefore, impacts are considered significant if the proposed development would be exposed to a high potential for such seismic hazards as ground shaking, liquefaction, and settlement, and soil hazards such as expansive soils, based on regional or site-specific conditions. 4.7.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The natural drainage patterns of the Project Site have been drastically altered due to historical activity, such as construction of containment berms. The East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek has been channelized by containment berms along the eastern and southern boundaries of the Project Site. However, the historical ox-bow channel and associated floodplain areas are still evident due to remnant mixed willow scrub habitat. In addition, containment berms constructed around the former oil tanks have created ephemeral wet areas and seasonal wet meadow throughout the Project Site that alter flood flow and contribute to groundwater recharge. Portions of the southwestern and southeastern areas of the Project Site are within the 100-year floodplain. The northwest area also lies within the 100-year floodplain. During peak winter rain events, the remediation component of the Project would add approximately 27,000 gallons per day to the flow in the east fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. The discharge of this continuous flow into the creek may potentially increase flow rates and impact flow velocities, which could be detrimental to downstream properties or habitats. These discharges would occur during the winter months and could potentially exacerbate already heavy flows within the nearby creeks and downstream. These geologic characteristics would impact the Project’s remediation and are discussed more fully in Section 4.2, Biological Resources, and Section 4.6, Wastewater. Further, with respect to remediation and the geologic and geotechnical hazards described above in Sections 4.7.1.4 and 4.7.1.5, (e.g., potential for ground rupture and ground shaking, expansive soils, hydroconsolidation, subsidence, dam inundation, etc.), there are no remediation-based Project-related impacts associated with these issues. Moreover, as part of the remediation component of the Project, the Applicant is proposing to prepare and grade the pads that would be eventually used for the development. However, from a geology perspective the impacts associated with the grading and construction of the building 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR pads cannot be separated from the building design and construction. Therefore, the impacts associated with building pad development are discussed under the City and County Development Plan impacts sections below. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact GR.1 Remediation activities may cause erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground-disturbing activities. Remediation Class II Construction remedial measures may cause an increased potential for short-term erosion and sedimentation of local and nearby drainages. Water and wind erosion of the stockpiles and loose dirt could impact surface water run-off. Sedimentation into local creeks would be a potentially significant impact. State and County requirements shall be implemented throughout construction, reducing the potential for off-site sedimentation. The Applicant would be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by/for the Central Coast Regional Water Control Board. Storm water best management practices (BMPs) would be installed around all soil stockpiles. Mitigation Measures GR-1a Prior to the issuance of the applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the remediation component of the Project for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Public Works. The plan shall include features meeting the construction activities best management practices and the applicable provisions of the erosion and sediment control best management practices (ESC-1 through ESC-56) published in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks (Construction Activity) and best management practices (CD-4(2)) of the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Contractor's Guide and Specifications, to ensure that every construction site meets the requirements of the regulations during the time of construction. GR-1b Prior to the issuance of the applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare an Erosion Control Plan and Wet Weather Plan for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Public Works. The plan shall detail the Best Management Practices that will be used on the site to control erosion and sedimentation to be implemented during all remediation activities. The plan shall include at least the following measures unless other erosion control measures are specified in the agency approved SWPPP: a. Graded areas shall be stabilized with riprap (i.e., crushed stone) or other ground cover as soon as grading is completed. The surface of slopes shall be roughened during the construction period to retain water, increase infiltration, and facilitate establishing vegetation. Tracked machinery shall be operated up and down parallel with) slopes to leave horizontal (perpendicular) depressions in the soil, which run across the slope, on the contour. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR b. Slope breaks, such as diversions, benches, or contour furrows shall be constructed to reduce the length of cut- and fill-slopes, thus limiting sheet and rill erosion and preventing gully erosion. c. Sediment barriers shall be used around construction areas to retain soil particles on-site and reduce surface runoff velocities during rainfall events. Sediment barriers could include straw bales, silt fences, and gravel and earth berms. Silt fences shall be placed on slope contours in areas where shallow overland flow is anticipated. d. Temporary and permanent drainages shall be employed, as necessary, to reduce slope erosion and prevent damage to construction areas. Sheet flow across or toward a disturbed area shall be intercepted and conveyed to a low to moderate gradient (1 to 5 percent slope) sediment basin, erosion-resistant drainage channel, or a level, well-vegetated area. Drainages would include swales, diversion dikes, and slope drains. e. Water bars, rolling dips, and out-sloping roads shall be constructed as part of new road construction to disperse runoff and reduce the erosive forces associated with concentrated flows. Residual Impacts Implementation of the above mitigation measures would reduce the impacts due to erosion and sedimentation as less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.7.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact GR.2 Seismically-induced ground shaking could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, potentially resulting in loss of property or risk to human health and safety. Development Class III Peak ground accelerations for the site are estimated to be approximately 0.98 g from the nearby faults, based on the design level ground acceleration. Earthquakes of this magnitude could damage project components and pose risks to human health and safety. The faults discussed in Section 4.7.1.4 and listed in Table 4.7-1 are not the only faults in the area that could produce earthquakes; however, they are the faults most likely to affect the Project Site according to the latest available data from the State of California. Earthquakes along these faults could produce potentially significant impacts to the proposed structures and improvements that would be built as part of the development phase. Although nothing can ensure that structures do not fail under seismic stress, proper engineering, including the recommended mitigation measures, can minimize the risks to life and property. In addition to the calculated expected ground accelerations, local site conditions may amplify site ground accelerations. Local building codes and the California Building Code (CBC) do not require any mitigation for possible amplifications resulting from these effects. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The County of San Luis Obispo Safety Element Liquefaction Hazard Map 1999 identifies the site as an area of potential liquefaction. Liquefaction, lateral spreading, seismic settlement, and ground lurching could occur in areas of loose and unconsolidated, low density sediments. The drainage areas that compose the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek and Tank Farm Creek may be prone to these hazards. No specific testing and evaluation have been performed in these areas to further assess the hazards. The Applicant would be required to design and construct all buildings to withstand the expected ground acceleration that may occur at the Project Site based on the California Building Code that is applicable at the time the buildings are permitted. The current California Building Codes requires that the design base ground motion for the site consider the soil type, potential for liquefaction, and the most current and applicable seismic attenuation methods available. The current California Building code requires that surface facilities, buildings, residential structures, and equipment have suitable foundations and anchoring design, surface restraints, and moment- limiting supports to withstand seismically-induced ground shaking. In addition the 2010 California Building Code, and the City of San Luis Obispo building code requires that slopes, roadways, and building pads are properly engineered. With these building code requirements the impacts associated with seismically-induced ground shaking would be considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts The residual impact associated with seismically-induced ground shaking would be less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact GR.3 Existing uncertified fill on-site could be subject to hydroconsolidation, excessive settlement, expansive soil shrink and swell, and differential settlement and expansion, and thus could damage proposed facilities, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Development Class III Based on site observations and previous studies, un-engineered fill has been placed across the Project Site at various locations for roads, holding ponds, and other operations. The exact locations and the horizontal and vertical limits of un-engineered fill have not been clearly discerned. Building the proposed structures on un-engineered fill could result in damage to the facilities, which would be a significant impact. The Project would have to meet all of the requirements of the City and the 2010 California Building Code as it relates to all grading activities, including the requirements for compacted engineering fill. With these building code requirements the impacts associated with uncertified fill would be considered less than significant. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts The residual impact associated with the use of uncertified fill would be less than significant Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact GR.4 Construction activities and grading may cause erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground-disturbing activities. Development Class II Grading and building activities associated with the development may cause an increased potential for short-term erosion and sedimentation of local and nearby drainages. Water and wind erosion of the stockpiles and loose dirt could impact surface water run-off. Sedimentation into local creeks would be a potentially significant impact. State and County requirements shall be implemented throughout construction, reducing the potential for off-site sedimentation. The Applicant would be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by/for the Central Coast Regional Water Control Board. Mitigation Measures GR-4a Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall prepare a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) certified professional for the development component of the Project for review and approval by the City of San Luis Obispo. The plan shall include features meeting the construction activities best management practices and the applicable provisions of the erosion and sediment control best management practices ESC-1 through ESC-56) published in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks (Construction Activity) and best management practices (CD- 4(2)) of the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Contractor's Guide and Specifications, to ensure that every construction site meets the requirements of the regulations during the time of construction. Further, the plan shall ensure compliance with and enrollment under the State Water Board General Construction Permit. GR-4b Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall prepare an Erosion Control Plan and Wet Weather Plan for review and approval by the City. The plan shall detail the best management practices that will be used on the site to control erosion and sedimentation to be implemented during all development activities. The plan shall include at least the following measures unless other erosion control measures are specified in the agency approved SWPPP: a. Graded areas shall be stabilized with riprap (i.e., crushed stone) or other ground cover as soon as grading is completed. The surface of slopes shall be roughened during the construction period to retain water, increase infiltration, and facilitate 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR establishing vegetation. Tracked machinery shall be operated up and down parallel with) slopes to leave horizontal (perpendicular) depressions in the soil, which run across the slope, on the contour. b. Slope breaks, such as diversions, benches, or contour furrows shall be constructed to reduce the length of cut- and fill-slopes, thus limiting sheet and rill erosion and preventing gully erosion. c. Sediment barriers shall be used around construction areas to retain soil particles on-site and reduce surface runoff velocities during rainfall events. Sediment barriers could include straw bales, silt fences, and gravel and earth berms. Silt fences shall be installed per specification on slope contours in areas where shallow overland flow is anticipated. d. Temporary and permanent drainages shall be employed, as necessary, to reduce slope erosion and prevent damage to construction areas. Sheet flow across or toward a disturbed area shall be intercepted and conveyed to a low to moderate gradient (1 to 5 percent slope) sediment basin, erosion-resistant drainage channel, or a level, well-vegetated area. Drainages would include swales, diversion dikes, and slope drains. e. Water bars, rolling dips, and out-sloping roads shall be constructed as part of new road construction to disperse runoff and reduce the erosive forces associated with concentrated flows. Residual Impacts Implementation of the above mitigation measures would reduce the impacts erosion and sedimentation as less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact GR.5 Moderately expansive soils prone to swelling and shrinking from increased or decreased water content could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Development Class II The on-site soils consist of interlayers of sand, silt and clay. The clay layers present a potential for moderate expansivity, though laboratory soils testing will be necessary during the development phase to determine the magnitude of the expansion potential. Expansive soils can heave foundations and slabs. These adverse effects could damage or cause catastrophic failure to structures and components, which could result in a significant impact. Foundations for structures and slabs constructed on expansive soils require special design considerations to mitigate the hazard. Mitigation Measures GR-5a Expansive soils should be mitigated by the over-excavation and replacement of non- expansive soils for all buildings and structures, as approved by the City of San Luis Obispo. Alternatively, all construction for buildings shall use thickened slabs, extended slab edges, and additional reinforcement to reduce negative impacts from 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR any expansive soil movement. Several equivalent remedial measures may be implemented that are standard construction and mitigation measures. In addition, capillary breaks shall be used under slabs to address the potential for moisture transport and pumping that leads to moisture infiltration as a result of heat and moisture gradients where buildings are sensitive to moisture infiltration. All remedial measures, designs, and calculations shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. GR-5b The Applicant shall use low- to non-expansive soils for slab, trench backfill, and pavement support to eliminate risk, which can be accommodated by importing select materials. Select grading techniques could utilize the granular soils on-site for subsequent use. Alternatively, an equivalent remedial measure to mitigate expansive soils may be implemented where the appropriate design and calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer, demonstrate a suitable design, and have been reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. GR-5c Soils shall be properly compacted as specified by a registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer should also specify the appropriate soil-water content for expansive soil mitigation. The compaction levels and soil-water content shall be approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permit. Residual Impacts Implementing the recommended mitigation measures would reduce the impacts of expansive soils to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact GR.6 Construction and improvement in areas lacking suitable factors of safety for existing slopes could result in gross or surficial instability, as well as earthquake-induced landslides, which could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Development Class III The majority of the Project Site area is relatively flat, with average slope gradients across the site area of less than 1 percent, with the exception of the Project Site’s northeast corner. The northeastern corner of the Project Site area consists of an outcropping of moderately sloped Franciscan Assemblege rocks that drops off steeply into a gravel pit ravine just beyond the Project Site boundary. This outcropping, known as the “Flower Mound” will be removed as part of the remediation component of the Project. The Applicant is proposing to use the material from the Flower Mound as engineered fill for some of the development sites. Additionally, located approximately 1,000 feet north of the Project Site’s northeast corner are relatively steep hills composed of Franciscan Assemblege rocks that appear susceptible to landsliding. County of San Luis Obispo Safety Element maps (SLO 1999) indicate that the Franciscan Assemblege rocks have a high potential for landsliding. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Based on the flat topography on-site and distance from suspected landslide areas, the potential for landsliding or the failure of natural slopes to affect the Project Site is low. Therefore, impacts from a landslide would be considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts The residual impact associated with slope failure due to existing landslides would be less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact GR.7 Compressible soils that underlie the site are prone to excessive settlement that could adversely affect the proposed development and improvements. Development Class II Consolidation tests performed on the site identified that the site is underlain by normally to low pressure over-consolidated clay layers (Padre 2007). Depending on grading, building location, and other factors, settlements may be on the order of 1 to 4 inches. No time-rates calculations or information to assess was provided in the report to determine waiting periods. This order of settlement poses the potential to damage remediation areas, buildings, pipelines and roadways and render them unusable, resulting in a hazard to public health and safety. Excessive settlement would pose a significant hazard to the Project, therefore mitigation measures are necessary. Mitigation Measures GR-7 Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall have a registered civil engineer prepare a geotechnical report based on the proposed development to the magnitude of total and differential settlements and time rates for waiting during construction. The report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The report shall discuss the measures that have been taken to ensure that the primary settlement is within acceptable limits for the proposed development. Acceptable measures could include but are not limited to: a. Surcharging the proposed building sites with fill for a specified time frame. Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the City for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. b. Partial or complete over-excavation of the clay layers and replacement with gravel drain layer and engineered fill. Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the City for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR c. Support structures on deepened foundations that extend thru the soft or unsuitable layers and derive support from suitable materials. Where necessary, the piles shall be required to be designed to withstand negative friction as necessary. Various foundations schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and practice in the industry. d. Perform in-situ remedial measures, such as sand drains, to accelerate and mitigate the anticipated settlements. Various schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and practice in the industry. Residual Impacts Implementation of the above mitigation measures would reduce the impacts excessive compression and resulting settlement as less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.7.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures All of the impacts and mitigation measures identified for the City Development Plan would apply to the County Development Plan. No additional impacts have been identified for the County Development Plan component of the Project. 4.7.7 Cumulative Analysis Cumulative impacts related to seismically-related ground shaking, liquefaction, and soil settlement, as well as landslides and other impacts would be similar to the Project-specific impacts. The impacts would be addressed on a project-by-project basis through compliance with existing building codes and any site-specific mitigation measures for individual projects. Compliance with applicable code requirements and the recommendations of site-specific geotechnical evaluations on a case-by-case basis would reduce cumulative impacts relating to geotechnical hazards to a less than significant level. 4.7.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.7.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party GR-1a Prior to the issuance of the applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the remediation component of the Project for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Public Works. The plan shall include features meeting the construction activities best management Review of SWPPP Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. San Luis Obispo County Public Works Central Coast Regional Water Quality 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party practices and the applicable provisions of the erosion and sediment control best management practices (ESC-1 through ESC-56) published in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks (Construction Activity) and best management practices (CD-4(2)) of the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Contractor's Guide and Specifications, to ensure that every construction site meets the requirements of the regulations during the time of construction. Control Board. GR-1b Prior to the issuance of the applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare an Erosion Control Plan and Wet Weather Plan for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Public Works. The plan shall detail the Best Management Practices that will be used on the site to control erosion and sedimentation to be implemented during all remediation activities. The plan shall include at least the following measures unless other erosion control measures are specified in the agency approved SWPPP: a. Graded areas shall be stabilized with riprap i.e., crushed stone) or other ground cover as soon as grading is completed. The surface of slopes shall be roughened during the construction period to retain water, increase infiltration, and facilitate establishing vegetation. Tracked machinery shall be operated up and down (parallel with) slopes to leave horizontal (perpendicular) depressions in the soil, which run across the slope, on the contour. b. Slope breaks, such as diversions, benches, or contour furrows shall be constructed to reduce the length of cut- and fill-slopes, thus limiting sheet and rill erosion and preventing gully erosion. c. Sediment barriers shall be used around construction areas to retain soil particles on-site and reduce surface runoff velocities during rainfall events. Sediment barriers could include straw bales, silt fences, and gravel and earth berms. Silt fences shall be placed on slope contours in areas where shallow overland flow is anticipated. d. Temporary and permanent drainages shall be employed, as necessary, to reduce slope erosion and prevent damage to construction areas. Sheet flow across or toward a disturbed area shall be intercepted and conveyed to a low to moderate gradient (1 to 5 percent slope) Review of Erosion Control Plan Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. San Luis Obispo County Public Works Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party sediment basin, erosion-resistant drainage channel, or a level, well-vegetated area. Drainages would include swales, diversion dikes, and slope drains. e. Water bars, rolling dips, and out-sloping roads shall be constructed as part of new road construction to disperse runoff and reduce the erosive forces associated with concentrated flows. 4.7.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party GR-4a Prior to the issuance of the applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) certified professional for the development component of the Project for review and approval by the City. The plan shall include features meeting the construction activities best management practices and the applicable provisions of the erosion and sediment control best management practices (ESC-1 through ESC-56) published in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks Construction Activity) and best management practices (CD-4(2)) of the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Contractor's Guide and Specifications, to ensure that every construction site meets the requirements of the regulations during the time of construction. Further, the plan shall ensure compliance with and enrollment under the State Water Board General Construction Permit. Review of SWPPP Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. City of San Luis Obispo Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. GR-4b Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall prepare an Erosion Control Plan and Wet Weather Plan for review and approval by the City. The plan shall detail the Best Management Practices that will be used on the site to control erosion and sedimentation to be implemented during all development activities. The plan shall include at least the following measures unless other erosion control measures are specified in the agency approved SWPPP: a. Graded areas shall be stabilized with riprap i.e., crushed stone) or other ground cover as soon as grading is completed. The surface of Review of Erosion Control Plan Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. City of San Luis Obispo Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party slopes shall be roughened during the construction period to retain water, increase infiltration, and facilitate establishing vegetation. Tracked machinery shall be operated up and down (parallel with) slopes to leave horizontal (perpendicular) depressions in the soil, which run across the slope, on the contour. b. Slope breaks, such as diversions, benches, or contour furrows shall be constructed to reduce the length of cut- and fill-slopes, thus limiting sheet and rill erosion and preventing gully erosion. c. Sediment barriers shall be used around construction areas to retain soil particles on-site and reduce surface runoff velocities during rainfall events. Sediment barriers could include straw bales, silt fences, and gravel and earth berms. Silt fences shall be installed per specification on slope contours in areas where shallow overland flow is anticipated. d. Temporary and permanent drainages shall be employed, as necessary, to reduce slope erosion and prevent damage to construction areas. Sheet flow across or toward a disturbed area shall be intercepted and conveyed to a low to moderate gradient (1 to 5 percent slope) sediment basin, erosion-resistant drainage channel, or a level, well-vegetated area. Drainages would include swales, diversion dikes, and slope drains. e. Water bars, rolling dips, and out-sloping roads shall be constructed as part of new road construction to disperse runoff and reduce the erosive forces associated with concentrated flows. GR-5a Expansive soils should be mitigated by the over- excavation and replacement of non-expansive soils for all buildings and structures, as approved by the City. Alternatively, all construction for buildings shall use thickened slabs, extended slab edges, and additional reinforcement to reduce negative impacts from any expansive soil movement. Several equivalent remedial measures may be implemented that are standard construction and mitigation measures. In addition, capillary breaks shall be used under slabs to address the potential for moisture transport and pumping that leads to moisture infiltration as a result of heat and moisture gradients where buildings are sensitive to moisture infiltration. All remedial measures, designs, and Review of engineering drawings Site Inspection Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. During construction City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party calculations shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. GR-5b The Applicant shall use low- to non-expansive soils for slab, trench backfill, and pavement support to eliminate risk, which can be accommodated by importing select materials. Select grading techniques could utilize the granular soils on-site for subsequent use. Alternatively, an equivalent remedial measure to mitigate expansive soils may be implemented where the appropriate design and calculations prepared by a registered civil engineer, demonstrate a suitable design, and have been reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permits. Review of engineering drawings Site Inspection Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. During construction City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo GR-5c Soils shall be properly compacted as specified by a registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer should also specify the appropriate soil- water content for expansive soil mitigation. The compaction levels and soil-water content shall be approved by the City prior to issuance of the applicable building permit. Review of engineering drawings Site Inspection Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. During construction City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo GR-7 Prior to the issuance of the applicable building permit, the Applicant shall have a registered civil engineer shall prepare a geotechnical report based on the proposed development to the magnitude of total and differential settlements and time rates for waiting during construction. The report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The report shall discuss the measures that have been taken to ensure that the primary settlement is within acceptable limits for the proposed development. Acceptable measures could include but not limited to: a. Surcharging the proposed building sites with fill for a specified time frame. Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the City for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. b. Partial or complete over-excavation of the clay layers and replacement with gravel drain layer and engineered fill. Settlement monuments shall be required to measure the total Review of the geotechnical report and engineering plans. Prior to issuance of applicable building permits. City of San Luis Obispo 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party settlement. The results of the survey shall be presented to the City for review and approval and should include time rate plots to demonstrate that at least 90 percent (t90) of the primary settlement (or as determined necessary) has occurred before any further construction of structures in the area. c. Support structures on deepened foundations that extend thru the soft or unsuitable layers and derive support from suitable materials. Where necessary, the piles shall be required to be designed to withstand negative friction as necessary. Various foundations schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and practice in the industry. d. Perform in-situ remedial measures, such as sand drains, to accelerate and mitigate the anticipated settlements. Various schemes will require specific design criteria, but are typical to these types of mitigation measures and should follow custom and practice in the industry. 4.7.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the City Development Plan would apply for the County Development Plan. 4.7.9 References Bartlett, S.F. & Youd, T.L. 1992. Empirical analysis of horizontal ground displacement generated by liquefaction-induced lateral spread. Tech. Rep. No. NCEER-92-0021, National Center for Earthquake Engineering, Buffalo, N.Y., 114. Bartlett, S.F. and Youd, T.L., 1995, “Empirical Prediction of Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spread”; Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 121, April, 1995. Boulanger, R.W. & Idriss, I.M. 2006. Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 132(11):1413-1426. Boulanger, R.W. & Idriss, I.M. 2006. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 26:115-130. California Building Code, 2010. http://publicecodes.citation.com/st/ca/st/index.htm. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.7-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CDMG 1996, Open File Report 96-08/ U.S.G.S. Open File Report 96-706, and Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 117. County of San Luis Obispo (SLO), County of San Luis Obispo General Plan: Safety Element, 1999. County of San Luis Obispo (SLO), 1999, Dam Inundation Map: Safety Element, 1999. Dibblee, T.W. and Minch, J.A., 2004, Geologic map of the San Luis Obispo quadrangle, San Luis Obispo County, California: Dibblee Geological Foundation, Dibblee Foundation Map EQFAULT 2003, ver 3 Deterministic and Probablistic Ground Acceleration Analysis: A brief screening of potential ground accelerations based on EQSEARCH and EQFAULT developed by Blake (2003). Hamada, M., Yasuda, S., Isoyama, R., & Emoto, K. 1986. Study on Liquefaction-Induced Permanent Ground Displacements. Association for the Development of Earthquake Prediction, Tokyo, Japan. Hamilton, D.H., & Meehan, R.L. 1971. Ground Rupture in the Baldwin Hills. Science., 172(3981):333-344. Holzers, T.L. & Galloway, D.L. 2005. Impacts of Land Subsidence Caused by the Withdrawal of Underground Fluis in the United States, Geologic Society of America, Reviews of Engineering Geology, Volume XVI. Jibson, R.W., Edwin, H.L. & John M.A. 1998. A Method for Producing Digital Probabilistic Seismic Landslide Hazard Maps: An Example from the Los Angeles, California, Area. USGS Professional paper. Open-File Report 98-113. O’Rourke, T.D. & Pease, J.W., 1997. Mapping liquefiable layer thickness for seismic hazard assessment, J. Geotech. Eng. 123 (1), 37-45. Seed, H.B. 1979. Soil Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Evaluation for Level Ground During Earthquakes. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE 105(GT2): 201-255 Seed, H.B. & Idriss, I.M. 1971. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, (SM9):1249- 1274. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1983, “Ground Motion and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes”; Earthquake Engineering Res. Inst. Monograph, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, El Cerrito, California. Serebryakov V.A. & Chillinger G.V. 2000. Prediction of Subsidence: Relationship Between Lowering of Formation Pressure and Subsidence Due to Fluid Withdrawal. Energy Sources., Vol. 22(5):409-416. Stark, Timothy, Eid, Hisham T., 1994, “Drained Residual Strength of Cohesive Soils”; Journal of Geotechnical and Geoevironmental Engineering; Vol. 120, No. 5. 4.7 Geological and Soil Resources December 2013 4.7-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR State of California, Department of Transportation. 2003. Caltrans Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook (Construction Activity). Zhang G., Robertson P.K. & Brachman R.W.I. 2004. Estimating Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Displacements Using the Standard Penetration Test or Cone Penetration Test. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, August 2004:861-871. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.8 Noise and Vibration This section describes the concepts and terminology of noise and vibration, defines the existing noise levels at noise-sensitive locations nearest to the Project Site, and describes the regulatory settings associated with the Project. This section also identifies the applicable significance thresholds for noise and vibration impacts, assesses potential impacts of the Project and alternatives, recommends measures to mitigate significant adverse impacts, and discusses cumulative projects, impacts, and mitigation measures. 4.8.1 Environmental Setting Noise is often defined as unwanted sound, and it is perceived subjectively by individuals. Noise levels at various locations of an area fluctuate and change character during different periods of the day. Exposure to severe noise levels over prolonged periods can cause physiological changes, including ear damage. The acceptability of more common noise levels and types of noise varies among neighborhoods, individuals, and time of day. The following sections describe the concepts and terminology of noise and vibration and document existing noise levels at noise sensitive locations nearest to the Project Site. Sound is technically described in terms of amplitude (loudness) and frequency (pitch). The standard unit of sound amplitude measurement is the decibel (dB). The decibel scale is a logarithmic scale that describes the physical intensity of the pressure vibrations that make up any sound. The pitch of the sound is related to the frequency of the pressure vibration. Because the human ear is not equally sensitive to a given sound level at all frequencies, a special frequency- dependent rating scale has been devised to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) provides this compensation by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. 4.8.1.1 Noise Effects Noise levels are reduced the farther away a receptor is from the source because of several of effects, including geometry, atmosphere, ground, and barrier. Geometric Effects Geometric effect refers to the spreading of sound energy as a result of the expansion of the wavefronts. Geometric spreading is independent of frequency and has a major effect in almost all sound propagation situations. There are two common kinds of geometric spreading: spherical and cylindrical. In the case of spherical spreading from a point source, which is due to a noise source radiating sound equally in all directions, the sound level is reduced by 6 dB for each doubling of distance from the source. A busy highway would be a cylindrical source with equal sound power output per unit length of highway. A cylindrical source will produce cylindrical spreading, resulting in a sound-level reduction of 3 dB per doubling of distance. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Atmospheric Effects Atmospheric effects are due to air absorption and wind and temperature gradients. Air absorption is primarily due to the “molecular relaxation effect” between air molecules, where air molecules are excited and then relaxed by the passing sound pressure wave. High frequencies (e.g. breaking glass, beepers) are absorbed more than low frequencies (e.g. thunder). The amount of absorption depends on the temperature and humidity of the atmosphere. Precipitation, either rain, snow, or fog, has an insignificant effect on sound levels although the precipitation will obviously affect the humidity and may also affect wind and temperature gradients. Atmospheric absorption is only an issue at higher frequencies and is a strong function of humidity and temperature. For example, at 68 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and 70 percent humidity, air absorption of sound at frequencies of 16,000 hertz (Hz) occurs at approximately 8 dB per 100 feet. But at 0 percent humidity, the rate drops to about 1 dB per 100 feet. Under normal circumstances, atmospheric absorption can be neglected except where long distances or high frequencies are involved (greater than 4,000 Hz). At less than 2,000 Hz, the rate of sound level drop, due to air absorption, is less than 0.25 dB per 100 feet (at 68°F and 70 percent humidity). The speed that sound propagates in a gas depends on the temperature of the gas. Higher temperatures produce higher speeds of sound. Since the temperature of the atmosphere is not uniform, there are local variations in the sound speed. For example, under normal conditions the atmosphere is cooler at higher altitudes. This results in sound waves being ‘bent’ upwards. This will result in the formation of a shadow zone, which is a region in which sound does not penetrate. In reality, some sound will enter this zone due to scattering. Scattering occurs when sound waves are propagating through the atmosphere and meet a region of inhomogeneity (a local variation in sound speed or air density) and some of their energy is re-directed into many other directions. In environmental noise situations, scattering is caused by air turbulence, rough surfaces, and obstacles such as trees. The scattering of sound by rain, snow, or fog at ordinary frequencies is insignificant. Under conditions of a temperature inversion (temperature increasing with increasing height), the sound waves will be refracted downwards, and therefore may be heard over larger distances. This frequently occurs in winter and at sundown. When a wind is blowing there will be a wind gradient because the layer of air next to the ground is stationary. A wind gradient results in sound waves propagating upwind being ‘bent’ upwards and those propagating downwind being ‘bent’ downwards. This effect can cause noise levels downwind to be higher than those upwind. Temperature and wind gradients can result in measured sound levels being very different to those predicted from geometrical spreading and atmospheric absorption considerations alone. These differences may be as great as 20 dB. These effects are particularly important where sound is propagating over distances greater than 500 feet. Temperature inversions and winds can also result in the effectiveness of a barrier being dramatically reduced. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Ground and Barrier Effects If sound is propagating over ground, attenuation will occur due to acoustic energy losses on reflection. These losses will depend on the surface. Smooth, hard surfaces will produce little absorption, whereas thick grass may result in sound levels being reduced by up to about 10 db per 300 feet at 2000 Hz. High frequencies are generally attenuated more than low frequencies. Reflection from the ground can result in another mechanism by which sound levels are reduced. When the source and receiver are both close to the ground, the sound wave reflected from the ground may interfere destructively with the direct wave. This effect (called the ground effect) is normally noticed over distances of several yards and more, and in the frequency range of 200 to 600 Hz. Research on propagation through trees yields conflicting results. Dense shrubbery can produce effective noise attenuation. A band of trees several hundred feet deep is required to achieve significant attenuation. Significant attenuation can be achieved with solid barriers. A barrier should be at least high enough to obscure the ‘line of sight’ between the noise source and receiver. A barrier is most effective for high frequencies since low frequencies are diffracted around the edge of a barrier more easily. The maximum performance of a barrier is limited to about 40 dB, due to scattering by the atmosphere. A barrier is most effective when placed either very close to the source or the receiver. Barriers not built for acoustical purposes are often found in sound propagation situations. The most common of these are hills and buildings. In urban situations, buildings can be effective barriers. It is possible for buildings to produce a different acoustical effect. In a street, multiple reflections from parallel building facades can result in considerable reverberation and consequently reduced attenuation. The propagation of sound is very complex and influenced by a large number of factors. This report only examines the attenuation of sound due to geometry, barriers specifically placed by the Project or mitigation measures, and barriers such as the terrain, as well as air absorption for the linear decibel scale analysis. Tonal Effects Noise in which a single frequency stands out, is said to contain a ‘pure tone.’ Sources that produce pure tones are often described as being “tonal” and tend to be more noticeable – and potentially annoying – to humans than sources that do not contain pure tones. In assessing the subjective impact of tonal noise, it is common practice to take this increased annoyance into account by adding a 5 dBA penalty to the measured noise level. Aircraft Noise Aircraft noise produced during take-off, flyover operations, and landing operations can cause community annoyance. Aircraft noise originates from both the engines and the airframe of an aircraft, but the engines are by far the more significant source of noise. Aircraft noise is broad- band noise but the energy in the low-frequency noise region (10 to 250 Hz) is the primary cause of annoyance due to aircraft noise, and dominates any effects caused by energy in higher frequency bands (Fidell 1999). Low frequencies are more easily passed into buildings and are less attenuated by air and therefore can travel farther than higher frequency noises. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Aircraft noise produces relatively high noise levels on an intermittent basis, which are generally not filtered out by vegetation or walls as the source is overhead, and this exacerbates the noise impacts from aircraft. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) uses the Day-Night Average A-weighted Sound Pressure Level (Ldn, see below) to quantify aircraft noise induced annoyance in the communities around airports. Generally, the FAA considers that Ldn levels above 65 dBA produce a high level of annoyance in 20 percent of the population. Effects on Wildlife Wildlife response to sound is dependent not only on the magnitude but also the characteristic of the sound, or the sound frequency distribution and whether the sound is natural or human made noise). Wildlife is affected by a broader range of sound frequencies than humans. Therefore, a linear decibel scale (non-A weighted) analysis is preferred for wildlife impact analysis. Noise is known to affect an animal’s physiology and behavior, and chronic noise-induced stress can be deleterious to an animal’s energy budget, reproductive success, and long-term survival (Radle 2001). 4.8.1.2 Noise Terminology A typical noise environment consists of a base of steady background noise that is the sum of many distant and indistinguishable noise sources. Superimposed on this background noise are the sounds from individual local sources. These sounds can vary from an occasional aircraft overflight to virtually continuous noise from traffic on a nearby roadway. Table 4.8-1 lists representative noise levels for specific activities. Table 4.8-1 Representative Environmental Noise Levels Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities 110— Rock Band Jet Fly-over at 100 feet —105— 100— Gas Lawnmower at 3 feet —95— 90— 85— Food Blender at 3 feet Diesel Truck going 50 mph at 50 feet —80— Garbage Disposal at 3 feet Noisy Urban Area during Daytime —75— Gas Lawnmower at 100 feet —70— Vacuum Cleaner at 10 feet Commercial Area —65— Normal Speech at 3 feet Heavy Traffic at 300 feet —60— 55— Large Business Office Quiet Urban Area during Daytime —50— Dishwasher in Next Room 45— Quiet Urban Area during Nighttime —40— Theater, Large Conference Room (background) Quiet Suburban Area during Nighttime —35— 30— Library 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.8-1 Representative Environmental Noise Levels Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities Quiet Rural Area during Nighttime —25— Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall (background) 20— 15— Broadcast/Recording Studio 10— 5— Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing —0— Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing Source: Federal Transit Administration 2006 Several rating scales have been developed to analyze the adverse effect of community noise on people. Because environmental noise fluctuates over time, these scales consider that the effect of noise upon people largely depends upon the total acoustical energy content of the noise, as well as the time of day when the noise occurs. The rating scales of Equivalent Continuous Sound Level (Leq), minimum instantaneous noise level (Lmin), and the maximum instantaneous noise level (Lmax) are measures of ambient noise, while the Day-Night Average Level (Ldn) and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) are measures of community noise (or noise levels with penalties for noise in the evening or nighttime). Leq is the average A-weighted sound level measured over a given time interval. Leq can be measured over any time period, but is typically measured for 1-minute, 15-minute, 1-hour, and 24-hour periods. CNEL is another A-weighted average sound level measured over a 24-hour time period. However, this noise scale is adjusted to account for some individuals’ increased sensitivity to noise levels during the evening and nighttime hours. Leq, Lmin, and Lmax, as well as Ldn and CNEL are all applicable to this analysis and defined as follows: Leq, the equivalent energy noise level in dBA, is the average acoustic energy content of noise for a stated period of time. Thus, the Leq of a time-varying noise and that of a steady noise are the same if they deliver the same acoustic energy to the ear during exposure. For evaluating community impacts, this rating scale does not vary, regardless of whether the noise occurs during the day or the night. Ldn, the Day-Night Average Level, is a 24-hour average Leq with a 10 dBA “weighting” or penalty added to noise the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity during the nighttime. The logarithmic effect of these additions is that a 60 dBA 24-hour Leq would result in a measurement of 66.4 dBA Ldn. CNEL, the Community Noise Equivalent Level, is a 24-hour average Leq with a 5 dBA weighting” during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and a 10 dBA “weighting” added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the evening and nighttime, respectively. The logarithmic effect of these additions is that a 60 dBA-24 hour Leq would result in a measurement of 66.7 dBA CNEL. Lmin is the minimum instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time, in dBA. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Lmax is the maximum instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time, in dBA. Noise environments and consequences of human activities are usually well represented by average noise levels during the day or night, or over a 24-hour period, as represented by the Ldn or the CNEL. Environmental noise levels are generally considered low when the CNEL is less than 60 dBA, moderate in the 60 to 70 dBA range, and high greater than 70 dBA. Examples of low daytime noise levels are isolated, natural settings that can provide noise levels as low as 20 dBA and quiet, suburban, residential streets that can provide noise levels around 40 dBA. Noise levels above 45 dBA at night can disrupt sleep. Examples of moderate-level noise environments are urban residential or semi-commercial areas (typically 55 to 60 dBA) and commercial locations (typically 60 dBA). People may consider louder environments adverse, but most will accept the higher noise levels associated with more noisy urban residential or residential- commercial areas (60 to 75 dBA), or dense urban or industrial areas (65 to 80 dBA). When evaluating changes in 24-hour community noise levels, a difference of 3 dBA is a barely perceptible increase to most people (Caltrans 1998). A 5-dBA increase is readily noticeable, while a difference of 10 dBA would be perceived as a doubling of loudness. New development within a community could potentially lead to activities that increase the 24-hour community noise levels. Noise levels from a particular source decline as distance to the receptor increases (see the Geometric Effects section). Other factors, such as the weather, wind, and reflecting or shielding factors, also help intensify or reduce the noise level at any given location. A commonly used rule of thumb for roadway noise (a linear noise source) is that for every doubling of distance from the source, the noise level is reduced by about 3 dBA at acoustically ‘hard’ locations (i.e., the area between the noise source and the receptor is nearly complete asphalt, concrete, hard-packed soil, or other solid materials) and 4.5 dBA at acoustically ‘soft’ locations (i.e., the area between the source and receptor is unpacked earth or has vegetation, including grass). Noise from stationary or point sources is reduced by about 6 to 7.5 dBA for every doubling of distance at acoustically hard and soft locations, respectively. Noise levels may also be reduced by intervening structures; generally, a single row of buildings between the receptor and the noise source reduces the noise level by about 5 dBA, while a solid wall or berm reduces noise levels by 5 to 10 dBA. 4.8.1.3 Vibration Vibration is acoustic energy transmitted as pressure waves through a solid medium, such as soil or concrete. Like noise, the rate at which pressure changes occur is the frequency of the vibration, measured in Hz. Vibration may be the form of a single pulse of acoustical energy, a series of pulses, or a continuous oscillating motion. Ground-Borne Vibration The way that vibration is transmitted through the ground depends on the soil type, the presence of rock formations or man-made features, and the topography between the vibration source and the receptor location. These factors vary considerably from site to site and make accurate 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR predictions of vibration levels at receptors distant from the source extremely difficult (often impossible) in practice. As a general rule, vibration waves tend to dissipate and reduce in magnitude with distance from the source. Also, the high frequency vibrations are generally attenuated rapidly as they travel through the ground, so that the vibration received at locations distant from the source tends to be dominated by low-frequency vibration. The frequencies of ground-borne vibration most perceptible to humans are in the range from less than 1 Hz up to 100 Hz. When a ground-borne vibration arrives at a building, there is usually an initial ground-to- foundation coupling loss. However, once the vibration energy is in the building structure it can be amplified by the resonance of the walls and floors. Occupants can perceive vibration as motion of the building elements (particularly floors) and also rattling of lightweight components, such as windows, shutters, or items on shelves. Vibrating building surfaces can also radiate noise, which is typically heard as a low-frequency rumbling known as ground-borne noise. At very high levels, low-frequency vibration can cause damage to buildings. Soil and subsurface conditions are known to have a strong influence on the levels of ground- borne vibration. Among the most important factors are the stiffness and internal damping of the soil and the depth to bedrock. Experience with ground-borne vibration is that vibration propagation is more efficient in stiff clay soils, and shallow rock seems to concentrate the vibration energy close to the surface and can result in ground-borne vibration problems at large distances from the track. Factors such as layering of the soil and depth to water table can have significant effects on the propagation of ground-borne vibration (FTA 2006) Vibration Measurement Vibration may be defined in terms of the displacement, velocity, or acceleration of the particles in the medium material. In environmental assessments, where human response is the primary concern, velocity is commonly used as the descriptor of vibration level, expressed in millimeters per second (mm/s). The amplitude of vibration can be expressed in terms of the wave peaks or as an average, called the root mean square (rms). The rms level is generally used to assess the effect of vibration on humans. Vibration levels for typical sources of ground-borne vibration are shown in Table 4.8-2 below. Vibration can produce several types of wave motion in solids including, compression, shear, and torsion, so the direction in which vibration is measured is significant and should generally be stated as vertical or horizontal. Human perception also depends to some extent on the direction of the vibration energy relative to the axes of the body. In whole-body vibration analysis, the direction parallel to the spine is usually denoted as the z-axis, while the axes perpendicular and parallel to the shoulders are denoted as the x- and y-axes respectively. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.8-2 Typical Levels of Ground-Borne Vibration Source Typical Velocity at 50 feet inches/second, rms)a Human or Building Response Blasting from construction projects 0.10 Minor cosmetic damage to fragile buildings Bulldozers and other heavy tracked construction equipment. 0.06 Workplace annoyance; difficulty with vibration- sensitive tasks. Commuter rail, upper range 0.02 Rapid transit rail, upper range 0.010 Distinctly Perceptible Residential annoyance for infrequent eventsCommuterrail, typical range 0.008 Bus or truck over bump 0.004 Barely perceptible. Residential annoyance for frequent eventsRapidtransitrail, typical range 0.003 Bus or truck typical 0.002 Threshold of perception Background vibration 0.0004 None a. rms = root mean square Source: FTA 2006 4.8.1.4 Sensitive Receptors Some land uses are more sensitive to noise than others, due to the amount of noise exposure and the types of activities typically involved. Residential areas, schools, libraries, religious institutions, hospitals, nursing homes, parks, some wildlife areas, and quiet outdoor recreation areas are generally more sensitive to noise than are commercial and industrial land uses. Figure 4.8-1 shows sensitive receptors near the Project Site. Receptors near the Project Site include: Residences along Prado Road; Mobile homes along Prado Road; Damon-Garcia sports fields; Mobile home park along Tank Farm Road; Residences to the south of the Project Site; and A church and a fitness center located along Tank Farm Road to the west of the Project Site. 4.8.1.5 Existing Noise Sources The noise sources currently near the Project Site and nearby vicinity are associated with traffic on adjacent roads, aircraft operations at San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA), railroad operations, industrial and residential activities in the area and the minimal existing operations at the Project Site. In addition, commercial operations at neighboring facilities contribute to the noise environment. The following sections discuss each of these noise sources. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.8-1 Sensitive Receptors and Noise Monitoring Locations near the Project Site Traffic Noise The predominant sources of traffic noise at the Project Site are vehicles on Tank Farm Road, Broad Street (State Route 227), South Higuera Street, and U.S. Highway 101 (approximately 0.75 miles from the Project Site). Noise levels from traffic are estimated in the San Luis Obispo County General Plan Noise Element for (then) current and future (2010) traffic levels (San Luis Obispo 1992). The Noise Element estimates that CNEL (or Ldn) noise levels along the roadways exceed 65 dBA due to roadway noise. Table 4.8-3 shows centerline distances to specific noise levels. Existing traffic-generated noise levels were also modeled using a version of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Model and current traffic data provided by the County of San Luis Obispo (County) and the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) (FHWA 1998). This analysis was conducted in order to demonstrate the noise levels associated with current traffic levels (the Noise Element addresses traffic levels in 1990 and projected levels for 2010). The analysis indicates that properties along Tank Farm Road or Broad Street are exposed to a traffic-generated CNEL of 66 to 67 dBA (at 100 feet from the road centerline) and noise levels of 60 dBA are experienced more than 400 feet from the Tank Farm Road. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.8-3 Roadway Noise Levels: Noise Element and Calculated Current Roadway Segment Noise at 100 feet, CNEL Distance to Noise Contour, ft 60 CNEL 65 CNEL 70 CNEL FHWA Model Calculated Values: Current Traffic Levels (2008) Tank Farm Rd. West of Broad St. (Hwy 227) 66.6 459 145 46 Tank Farm Rd. West of Santa Fe Rd. 66.2 411 130 41 S. Higuera St. at Los Osos Valley Rd. 62.9 196 62 - Broad (SR 227) North of Tank Farm Rd. 65.9 384 122 - U.S. Highway 101 at Los Osos Valley Rd. 78.1 5,582 1,765 558 Noise Element Values: 1990 Tank Farm Rd. Between S. Higuera and Broad Sts. - 200 93 43 Broad Street (SR 227) S. of Tank Farm Rd. - 174 81 37 Broad Street (SR 227) N. of Tank Farm Rd. - 208 97 45 U.S. Highway 101 S. of S. Higuera St. - 891 414 192 U.S. Highway 101 N. of S. Higuera St. - 1077 500 232 Noise Element Values: Future (2010) Tank Farm Rd. Between S. Higuera and Broad Sts. - 278 129 60 Broad Street (SR 227) S. of Tank Farm Rd. - 292 135 63 Broad Street (SR 227) N. of Tank Farm Rd. - 311 145 67 U.S. Highway 101 S. of S. Higuera St. - 1268 589 273 U.S. Highway 101 N. of S. Higuera St. - 1588 737 342 Railroad Grade Crossing - 525 244 113 Railroad Open Track - 463 352 76 Notes: Distances are in feet from roadway centerline. Local streets based on San Luis Obispo County Public Works Traffic Counts December 2008. U.S. Highway 101 truck traffic based on CalTrans 2007 truck traffic at Highway 1 north interchange for 2007 (5.6% heavy trucks). Local roads truck data based on State Route 227 truck ratios. Time of day distribution based on Noise Element Technical Reference Document (SLOC 1992). The CNEL along U.S. Highway 101 can range up to 78 dBA within 100 feet of the highway and noise levels of 60 dBA are experienced more than a mile from the roadway. Table 4.8-3 provides the distances to noise contours from the roadway centerline of each road. These estimates are based on a peak hour volume and truck percentage from the CalTrans published traffic counts for Broad Street (State Route 227) from 2007 and 2008 applied to all roads (except U.S. Highway 101, which used the CalTrans data). Aircraft Noise The SLOCRA is adjacent to the Project Site to the southeast. According to Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) maps, the 60 dBA contours for aircraft noise almost completely covers the Project Site, except for the northeast and southwest corners (San Luis Obispo County 2005). Figure 4.8-2 shows the ALUP single-event noise contours at the Project Site for the airport operating at runway capacity. Figure 4.8-3 shows the CNEL noise contours. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.8-2 Airport Land Use Plan Single Event Noise Contours at Runway Capacity Source: San Luis Obispo County 2005, Airport Land Use Plan Figure 2 for single-event (peak noise). 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.8-3 Airport Land Use Plan CNEL Noise Contours at Runway Capacity Source: San Luis Obispo County 2005, Airport Land Use Plan Figure 1 for CNEL (average noise) 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Railroad Noise The railroad is approximately 0.6 mile to the east of the Project Site. Noise levels due to railroad activity are estimated in the General Plan Noise Element. These estimates are based on ten freight and four passenger trains per day. Distances to the 60 dB contour value range up to 525 feet from a grade crossing. See Table 4.8-3. Commercial/Industrial/Residential and Recreational Noise The area near the Project Site includes some light industrial/commercial areas as well as residential and recreational areas that could generate noise. Figure 4.8-1 depicts many of these. These include the following: Storage facilities along Prado Road; Office/business parks along Sueldo Street; Light industrial, such as the Auto Salvage and United Rentals, along Tank Farm Road near South Higuera Street; Light industrial, commercial, and office park along Tank Farm Road near Broad Street; Recreational, at the soccer fields located at Damon-Garcia sports fields; Agricultural, at agricultural operations south and east of the Project Site; Residential, along Tank Farm Road (the Hidden Hills Mobilodge) and the Mobile Home Park along Prado Road. All of these locations potentially produce noise due to activities on an intermittent basis. County Noise Element Noise Survey As a part of the County Noise Element, a noise survey was conducted in 1990. The noise survey measured community noise levels at 41 different sites throughout the County. The noise survey results indicated that typical noise levels ranged from 39 to 62 dBA Ldn. The quietest areas were those away from major transportation noise sources and the noisier locations were in areas near U.S. Highway 101 and major local streets. The closest measurement location to the Project Site was 2.8 miles to the south near the San Luis Obispo Country Club (location #5) approximately 1/3 mile from State Route 227. Ldn at this location was estimated to range from 41 to 45 dBA. 4.8.1.6 Noise Measurements Noise measurements were obtained as part of this EIR analysis in August 2009, in the vicinity of the Project Site. The measurements were taken at six locations during the day, evening, and nighttime to allow for a calculation of CNEL. The results of these measurements and their locations are shown in Table 4.8-4 and Figure 4.8-1. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.8-4 Existing Ambient Noise Levels Near the Project Site No. Location Daytime Leq dBA) Evening Leq dBA) Nighttime Leq dBA) CNEL dBA) Noise Sources 1 Prado Road 60.3 54.1 43.3 60.2 Traffic to U-haul facility, dogs barking at kennel, cows 2 Damon-Garcia Sports Fields 57.1 44.2 43.2 56.0 Airplanes during the day, birds, distant traffic 3 Mobilodge Mobile Home Park 49.5 48.4 43.3 54.2 Airplanes during the day, kids playing, voices, distant traffic 4 Esperanza Lane 42.4 39.8 40.7 49.2 Birds, goats, distant traffic, sprinklers 5 Tank Farm Road 73.2 70.8 65.8 76.9 Airplanes during day, traffic noise, pump station pumps, cows 6 Granada /Sueldo Drive 49.3 47.3 42.7 53.4 Airplanes during day, cows, crickets Source: In-field measurements taken August 2009 by MRS and a Quest 1900 noise meter. The noise baseline in the area is generally dominated by traffic noise and airplanes, which produce a CNEL above 70 dBA for areas close to roadways (along Tank Farm Road). In combination with aircraft noise, most sensitive receptors near the Project Site are subject to background noise levels exceeding 53 dBA CNEL (except the relatively quiet areas south of the Project Site along Esperanza Lane). 4.8.2 Regulatory Setting 4.8.2.1 State Regulations California Health and Safety Code, Division 28, Noise Control Act The California Noise Control Act states that excessive noise is a serious hazard to public health and welfare and that it is the policy of the state to provide an environment for all Californians that is free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare. California Government Code Section 65302 Section 65302(f) of the California Government Code and the Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise Element of the General Plan, prepared by the California Department of Health Services and included in the 1990 State of California General Plan Guidelines published by the State Office of Planning and Research, provide requirements and guidance to local agencies in the preparation of their Noise Elements. The Guidelines require that major noise sources and areas containing noise-sensitive land uses be identified and quantified by preparing generalized noise exposure contours for current and projected conditions. Contours may be prepared in terms of either the CNEL or the Ldn, which are descriptors of total noise exposure at 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR a given location for an annual average day. The CNEL and Ldn are generally considered to be equivalent descriptors of the community noise environment within plus or minus 1.0 dB. California Public Utilities Code PUC Code, Section 21670, states that: (1) it is in the public interest to provide for the orderly development of each public use airport in this state and the area surrounding these airports so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards adopted pursuant to Section 21669 and to prevent the creation of new noise and safety problems; and that 2) it is the purpose of this article to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses. 4.8.2.2 County Local Ordinances and Policies The applicable noise standards governing the Project Site are the criteria in the County’s Noise Element of the General Plan, which covers noise exposure from major sources in the County including roadways, railways, airports, and stationary sources, and the criteria in the County’s Municipal Code, covering stationary noise sources such as loading docks, parking lots, and ventilation equipment. The San Luis Obispo County Noise Element of the General Plan provides a policy framework for addressing potential noise impacts in the planning process. The Noise Element is directed at minimizing future noise conflicts, whereas a noise ordinance focuses on resolving existing noise conflicts. The Noise Element includes maps showing the extent of noise exposure from the major noise sources in the County (roadways, railways, airports, and stationary sources), along with the goals, policies, and implementation programs adopted by the County to reduce future noise impacts. The goals of the Noise Element, compiled under the mandate of Section 65302(f) of the California Government Code and guidelines prepared by the California Department of Health Services, are to ensure that all areas of the County are free from excessive noise and that appropriate maximum levels are adopted for residential, commercial, and industrial areas; to reduce new noise sources to the maximum extent possible; to reduce, to the maximum extent possible, the impact of noise within the County; and to ensure that land uses are compatible with the related noise characteristics of those uses. Among the most significant policies of the Noise Element are numerical noise standards that limit noise exposure within noise-sensitive land uses and performance standards for new commercial and industrial uses that might adversely impact noise-sensitive land uses. When the potential for adverse noise impacts is identified, mitigation is required to carry out the specific recommendations of an expert in acoustics or, under some circumstances, by implementing standard noise mitigation packages. When mitigation is required, highest priority is given to avoiding or reducing noise impacts through site planning and project design, and lowest priority is given to structural mitigation measures such as construction of sound walls and acoustical treatment of buildings. The County has identified these noise-sensitive uses: 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residential development, except temporary dwellings; Schools, preschool to secondary; colleges and universities; specialized education and training; Health care services (hospitals); Nursing and personal care; Churches; Public assembly and entertainment; Libraries and museums; Hotels and motels; Bed and breakfast facilities; Outdoor sports and recreation; and Offices. The Noise Element specifies the ranges of noise exposure from transportation noise sources which are considered to be acceptable, conditionally acceptable, or unacceptable for the development of different land uses. Figure 4.8-4 shows whether mitigation is needed for development of land uses near major transportation noise sources. In areas where the noise environment is acceptable, new development may be permitted without requiring noise mitigation. For areas where the noise environment is conditionally acceptable, new development would be allowed only after noise mitigation has been incorporated into the design of the Project to reduce noise exposure. For areas where the noise environment is unacceptable, new development is usually not feasible. For residential land uses, the Noise Element recommends an exterior noise standard of 60 dBA Ldn CNEL and an interior noise standard of 45 dBA Ldn CNEL. Table 4.8-5 lists the County’s maximum exterior noise levels for stationary noise sources. Table 4.8-6 lists the County’s maximum allowable noise exposure for noise from transportation noise sources. Table 4.8-5 Noise Element Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure - Stationary Sources Daytime 7:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m.) Nighttime 10:00 p.m.–7:00 a.m.) Hourly Leq 50 45 Maximum Level, Lmax 70 65 Maximum Level – Impulsive Noise, Lmax 65 60 Notes: As determined at the property line of the receiving land use. When determining the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures, the standards may be applied on the receptor side of the noise barrier or other property line Source: San Luis Obispo County 1992. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.8-4 Land Use Compatibility for New Development Near Transportation Noise Sources Source: San Luis Obispo County Noise Element 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Chapter 10, Section 120 of Title 22 of the County Municipal Code establishes standards for acceptable exterior and interior noise levels and describes how noise shall be measured. These standards are intended to protect persons from excessive noise levels, which are detrimental to the public health, welfare, and safety. Excessive noise levels are also contrary to the public interest because they can interfere with sleep, communication, relaxation, and full enjoyment of one’s property; contribute to hearing impairment and a wide range of adverse physiological stress conditions; and adversely affect the value of real property. The interior and exterior noise standards established in the County’s Land Use Ordinance are consistent with the noise exposure standards in the County’s General Plan Noise Element. Table 4.8-6 Noise Element Maximum Allowable Noise Exposure - Transportation Sources Land Use Outdoor Areas Interior Spaces Ldn/CNEL, dB Ldn/CNE L, dB Leq dB Residential (except temporary dwellings and residential accessory uses) 60 45 -- Bed and Breakfast Facilities, Hotels, and Motels 60 45 -- Hospitals, Nursing and Personal Care 60 45 -- Public Assembly and Entertainment (except Meeting Halls) -- -- 35 Offices 60 -- 45 Churches, Meeting Halls -- -- 45 Schools – Preschool to Secondary, College and University, Specialized Education and Training, Libraries and Museums 45 Outdoor Sports and Recreation 70 -- -- Source: San Luis Obispo County 1992 and City General Plan 1996 section 4 Table 1. The County Code standards are not applicable to noise from construction between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., from Monday through Friday, and between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. Construction occurring outside of those hours is subject to the County Code. 4.8.2.3 County Airport Land Use Plan The County’s ALUP is developed by the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Commission and was first adopted in 1973 and subsequently amended in 1974, 1977, 2002, 2004, and 2005. The purpose of the plan is to; protect the long term economic viability of the airport by ensuring compatible land uses in the vicinity of the airport; to promote the safety and well-being of the public by ensuring adoption of land use regulations which minimize exposure of persons to hazards; to provide a set of policies to assist the ALUC in evaluating the compatibility of proposed local actions; and to provide guidance to local agencies. In regard to noise, the ALUP objective is to minimize the number of people exposed to frequent and/or high levels of airport noise, including limiting the development of land uses that are 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR sensitive to noise. The ALUP prescribes a projected 55 dBA CNEL as the maximum acceptable residential noise level for new residential development. The ALUP also defines the maximum allowable interior noise levels from aviation-related noise sources at different land uses, including the required level of noise mitigation associated with the proposed land use as a function of the projected single-event level of noise that the proposed land use could be exposed to. The mitigations could be a five dBA attenuation for offices proposed for development within the 65 dBA single-event noise contour. Mitigations also could be as high as a required 35 dBA attenuation for residential projects located within the 85 dBA single-event noise contour. The ALUP noise policies also specify allowable land uses within the CNEL noise contours. Within the 60 dBA CNEL contour, only moderately sensitive land uses are allowed (no extremely sensitive land uses allowed, such as residences, restaurants with outdoor seating areas). Between the 55 to 60 dBA CNEL contour, extremely sensitive land uses are allowed as infill only. Outside of the 55 dBA CNEL contour, all land uses are allowed. 4.8.2.4 City Local Ordinances and Policies The City of San Luis Obispo’s (City) General Plan guides the use and protection of various resources to meet community purposes. Chapter 4 of the City General Plan addresses noise. The Noise Element sets noise exposure standards for noise-sensitive land uses and performance standards for new commercial and industrial uses. The Noise Element establishes a noise compatibility chart, identical to the County compatibility chart shown in Figure 4.8-4. It establishes maximum allowable transportation noise exposures for land uses similar to the County as shown in Table 4.8-6, except that it addresses impacts to playgrounds specifically with a limit of 65 dBA. Maximum allowable noise exposure for stationary sources is the same as the County, as shown in Table 4.8-5. It also includes a flowchart for determining noise exposure and mitigation. The City General Plan Noise Element contains goals and policies for the compatibility of sensitive land uses with noise. These policies are applicable to the Project: City Policy N 1.3 - New noise-sensitive development shall be located and designed to meet the maximum outdoor and indoor noise exposure levels. City Policy N 1.4 - Noise created by new transportation noise sources, including road, railroad, and airport expansion projects, shall be mitigated to not exceed the levels specified in Table 4.8-6). City Policy N 1.5 - The noise level standards should be used as criteria for limiting traffic growth on (A) Residential Collector streets, as designated by the Circulation Element, and B) Local Streets, as designated by the Circulation Element, which extend through areas designated for residential uses. The San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Title 9, Section 12, addresses noise control. It states that it is the policy of the City to maintain quiet in those areas which currently exhibit low noise levels, 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR and to implement programs aimed at reducing noise in those areas within the City where noise levels are above acceptable values. The City also publishes a Noise Guidebook to help guide noise assessments and to design projects so that they will comply with the City’s Noise Element. As there is some overlap between the City and the ALUP, some of the ALUP noise policies are applicable to the City areas as well (see above). A preliminary analysis of the Project’s consistency with applicable noise plans and polices is provided in Appendix E. Construction The City Code prohibits the following for construction activities: Operating or causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work between weekday hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m., or any time on Sundays or holidays, such that the sound creates a noise disturbance across a residential or commercial real property line; Operating or permitting the operation of any device that creates a vibration which is above the vibration perception threshold of an individual at or beyond the property boundary of the source if on private property or at 150 feet from the source if on a public space or public right-of-way; Where technically and economically feasible, construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner that the maximum noise levels at affected properties will not exceed those listed in Table 4.8-7. Operations The City Code prohibits the following for operational activities: No person shall cause or allow to cause, any source of sound at any location within the incorporated City or allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on any other property, either incorporated or unincorporated, to exceed: The noise standard for that land use as specified in Table 4.8-8 for a cumulative period of more than 30 minutes in any hour; or The noise standard plus 5 dB for a cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour; or The noise standard plus 10 dB for a cumulative period of more than 5 minutes in any hour; or The noise standard plus 15 dB for a cumulative period of more than 1 minute in any hour; or The noise standard plus 20 dB for any period of time. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.8-7 City of San Luis Obispo Construction Noise Limits At Residential Properties - Mobile Equipment Maximum noise levels for nonscheduled, intermittent, short-term operation (less than 10 days) of mobile equipment: Single Family Residential Multifamily Residential Mixed Residential and Commercial Daily, except Sundays and legal holidays 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 75 dBA 80 dBA 85 dBA Daily, 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., and all day Sunday and legal holidays 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA At Residential Properties - Stationary Equipment Maximum noise levels for repetitively scheduled and relatively long-term operation (periods of 10 days or more) of stationary equipment Daily, except Sundays and legal holidays, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Daily, 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., and all day Sunday and legal holidays. 50 dBA 55 dBA 60 dBA At Business Properties - Mobile Equipment Maximum noise levels for nonscheduled, intermittent, short-term operation of mobile equipment: Daily, including Sunday and legal holidays, all hours; maximum of 85 dBA. At Business Properties - Stationary Equipment Maximum noise levels for repetitively scheduled and relatively long-term operations of stationary equipment: Daily, including Sundays and legal holidays, all hours; maximum of 75 dBA. All mobile or stationary internal combustion engine powered equipment or machinery shall be equipped with suitable exhaust and air intake silencers in proper working order. Source: San Luis Obispo City Municipal Code Title 9.12 Table 4.8-8 City of San Luis Obispo Exterior Noise Limits Zoning Category Time Period Noise Level (dBA) R-1 and R-2 C/OS Low Density Residential 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 50 7:00 a.m. –10:00 p.m. 55 R-3 and R-4 High Density Residential 10:00 p.m. –7:00 a.m. 50 7:00 a.m. –10:00 p.m. 55 O, PF Ltd. Commercial 10:00 p.m. –7:00 a.m. 55 7:00 a.m. –10:00 p.m. 60 C-N, C-R, C-C, C-T 60 Commercial 10:00 a.m. –7:00 p.m. 60 7:00 a.m. –10:00 p.m. 65 C-S Light Industrial Any Time 70 M Heavy Industrial Any Time 75 Note: Levels not to be exceeded more than 30 minutes in any hour. Source: City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Title 9 Section 12.060 Table 1 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City Code also prohibits operating or permitting the operation of any device that creates a vibration which is above the vibration perception threshold of an individual (defined as 0.01 inches/second) at or beyond the property boundary of the source. 4.8.3 Significance Criteria Noise and vibration impacts are associated with operations and construction activities. Operational noise impacts are associated with traffic and stationary activities. Noise impacts could be Project-generated that could potentially impact existing surrounding receptors (e.g., increased traffic), and existing automobile and aircraft traffic that could impact the Project. Impacts, including background noise levels, are measured against the County Noise Element, The City General Plan and the City Noise Control Code to determine significance. No Statewide criteria exist. 4.8.3.1 Operations Traffic and Aircraft Long-term off-site impacts from traffic noise are measured against two criteria. Both of these criteria must be met for a significant impact to be identified: Traffic noise levels would increase by more than 3 dBA compared to existing conditions on a roadway segment adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use; and Resulting traffic noise level would exceed the criteria level for the noise-sensitive land use. In this case, the criteria level is 60 dBA CNEL for residential hotel, hospital, and office uses and 70 dBA CNEL for outdoor sports and recreation uses land uses (as per the County Noise Element and City General Plan). A noise level increase of 3 dBA or more is perceptible to the human ear and is often used as a threshold for a substantial increase. This level of increase was selected for areas that already exceed those levels specified in the City General Plan or the County Noise Element in order to minimize noise exposure and noise generation”. Impacts associated with existing automobile and aircraft traffic that could impact the proposed Project would be considered significant if: Existing traffic noise levels at the Project Site exceed the County or City Land Use Compatibility guidelines (from the respective Noise Element). For aircraft impacts, development within the existing airport noise contours as specified in the ALUP, could necessitate the implementation of noise mitigations on proposed development. Development within these specified noise contours without the mitigations prescribed in the ALUP would be considered a significant impact. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.8.3.2 Operations Stationary Sources The Project would be considered to generate a significant impact if: The development would generate noise levels above those specified by the City Code noise limits for the respective land use; or The development would generate noise levels above those specified by the County Noise Element/Municipal Code. 4.8.3.3 Construction Activities Construction activities on-site would be considered significant if any of the following apply: The City construction noise limits are exceeded at any of the applicable land uses; The construction is conducted outside the applicable County Municipal Code allowable timeframe; or Vibration levels generated by construction activities that exceed 0.01 inches/second at the Project boundary (City Code). A vibration level of above 0.01 inches/second would be considered “exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels”. 4.8.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The remediation phases of the Project would generate noise due to a number of construction- related activities, including activities using construction equipment (i.e., backhoes, dozers, excavators), crushing operations, blasting operations at the Flower Mound area, as well as vehicle trips on area roadways. Each of these is discussed below. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact N.1 On-site construction activities could generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Remediation Class II Noise would be generated by construction equipment operating at different times during the remediation phase of the Project. The peak activities that could produce the peak off-site noise levels would be associated with remediation activities on the east end of the Project Site, such as activities at Reservoir 4 and the Flower Mound, both of which could be occurring simultaneously. Activities at these locations would include grading, removal of soils from the Reservoir 4 and Flower Mound borrow area, crushing operations at the Flower Mound area to produce gravel to be used at other locations of the Project Site, and blasting activities at the Flower Mound area to break-up rocks that would be used in the crushing plant to produce gravel. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Project proposes to blast areas within the Flower Mound to generate rock materials to be used in the crushing plant. The crushing plant would then generate gravel to be used in the caps around the site as part of the remediation component of the Project. Often, the only means of loosening a rock mass and reducing it to a material of manageable size is to blast using explosives placed within drilled holes. Many variables relate to the execution of a blast, only some of which are within the control of the blaster. Some of these variables are difficult, if not impossible, to adequately define (CALTRANS 2004). When a blast is detonated, only a portion of the energy is consumed in breaking up and moving the rock. The remaining energy is dissipated in the form of seismic waves expanding rapidly outward from the blast, either through the ground (as vibration) or through the air (as noise). While a blaster can quite easily design his blasts to stay well below any vibration or air overpressure levels that could cause damage, it is virtually impossible to design blasts that are not audibly perceptible by people in the vicinity (CalTRANS 2004). Blasting noise levels are estimated based on FHWA average blast noise levels. A mobile home park is located immediately east of these areas (Reservoir 4 and the Flower Mound), which would constitute residential receptors. Baseline noise was monitored at this location (Refer to Table 4.8-1, location number 3). Noise levels off-site were estimated utilizing the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model FHWA 2006). Equipment numbers were used based on information in Chapter 2.0, Project Description. Table 4.8-9 shows the assumptions used to estimate the noise levels from on-site remediation activities. The City Municipal Code specifies time limits on construction activities and allowable noise levels associated with mobile and stationary equipment. The intermittent, short-term allowable noise level for mobile equipment is 75 dBA during daily time hours. The Municipal Code does not specify a noise limit for mobile equipment over a longer-term basis. However, the noise limit for stationary equipment over the longer term is specified as 60 dBA day time for residential areas. The crushing activities associated with the use of the crushing plant could be considered longer-term stationary activities as it would last longer than 10 days as specified by the Municipal Code). For the short-term, mobile criteria, the noise levels generated by the remediation activities would be less than the threshold. However, the crushing activities would generate noise levels above the longer-term, stationary equipment thresholds. In addition, if construction activities were to occur between weekday hours of 9 p.m. and 7 a.m., or 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. on Saturdays or Sundays (County Code), this would conflict with the County Municipal Code and would potentially be a significant impact if noise levels would exceed the County or City Code allowable noise levels. Mitigation measures to locate the crushing operations farther from the residential areas, or equivalent measures and to limit construction activity periods would mitigate the impacts. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.8-9 Equipment and Noise Impacts on Mobile Home Park – Reservoir 4 and Flower Mound Activities Equipment Description Acoustical Use Factor Lmax @ 50ft dBA) Crushing Activities Flower Mound Activities Number of Equipment Receptor Noise Level + Baseline, Leq Number of Equipment Receptor Noise Level + Baseline, Leq Blasting 1 94 0 - 1 54.2 Dozer 40 85 0 - 3 64.4 Dump Truck 40 84 1 59.0 8 67.5 Crushing Operation 20 95 1 66.5 0 - Loader 40 80 2 58.1 1 55.6 Total Noise Level 67.7 69.6 Combined Noise Level at Receptor 71.7 Noise Threshold* 60 75 Notes: Distance of Mobile Home from Crushing Activities (600 feet) and Flower Mound Activities (1,000 feet). For crushing used the long term stationary threshold, for flower mound, used the short-term mobile. A long term mobile threshold is not presented in the City Code. Source: Equipment, Use Factor and Lmax noise levels from FHWA 2006 Mitigation Measures N-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that the crushing plant is located at least 1,500 feet away from any residential receptor or an equivalent distance or is treated with some other form of acoustical mitigation (e.g., located within an enclosure) to ensure noise levels at the closest residential receptor are below 60 dBA. The location of the crushing plant shall be identified on the site plan for the grading permit. If noise reducing measures are applied instead of increased distances, vibration calculations shall be performed to demonstrate that vibration impacts would remain below the applicable thresholds. N-1b The Applicant shall ensure that all construction activity at the Project Site (including deliveries and arriving and departing workers) is limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and prohibit activities on Saturdays, Sundays, and federal holidays. If activities outside this timeframe occur, noise monitoring shall be established to demonstrate that applicable noise codes are not exceeded. This shall be a note placed on all construction plans. N-1c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, and throughout construction, the Applicant shall ensure that all construction machinery is maintained according to the manufacturers’ specifications and ensure that mufflers and silencers are maintained properly. Back-up OSHA noise indicators shall be ambient sensitive and self-adjusting to minimize backup indicator noise or flaggers shall be used in the place of backup alarms (as allowed by OSHA). 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR N-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall provide formal notification to all sensitive receptors (including residential and office) within 1,000 feet of the Project area prior to commencing the blasting or rock crushing operation. The notification should identify potential noise, work hours and time frame, and contact information. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the notice and a list of addresses to where the notice was sent (see Mitigation Measure N-2). Residual Impacts Locating the crushing activities farther away from residential areas would reduce the noise levels associated with stationary equipment to below the 60 dBA threshold. In addition, limiting the hours of construction activities to weekdays between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m, or implementing noise monitoring to ensure codes are not exceeded, would reduce the impact of construction noise on nearby sensitive receptors. Studies by the FHWA indicate that backup alarms constitute 41 percent of complaints from construction noise (FHWA 2006). Measures to reduce or eliminate the use of backup indicators some signaling, either alarms or flaggers are required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA]) and to maintain construction equipment would reduce the impacts to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Note that blasting noise does not contribute substantially to the average noise levels (which are used to determine significance) as it occurs only occasionally. However, as it would be audible to area residences, some concerns could arise if residences are not aware of the activities. Therefore, notification has been included as a mitigation measure. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact N.2 On-site construction activities including blasting of rock could generate vibration impacts to nearby areas. Remediation Class II Construction activities could increase ground vibration and create annoyance for humans. Vibration levels from blasting activities could produce the highest vibration levels and were estimated at the sensitive receptors. Vibration from activities was assumed to have point source propagation characteristics, as described by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA 2006). As a worst case, vibration data from a pile driver and sheetpiling were used to approximate crushing activity vibrations, as both activities could produce substantial shaking. Most likely, the vibration levels due to crushing would be less than this level. Vibrations associated with setup, crushing, blasting, and removing equipment would vary over time. The actual peak vibration levels during these periods would only last for a few minutes, and these periods would be rare and relatively short-lived. Vibration levels for impact pile drivers (the surrogate for crushing operations) are based on studies by the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA 1995). Under normal propagation in soil conditions, vibration levels at residences 700 feet or more from the crushing would be below the Municipal Code vibration significance criteria of 0.01 inches per second. This would be a 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR potentially significant impact if receptors were within 700 feet of the crushing. Mitigation measure N-1a requires that the crushing operations be at least 1,500 feet from any residence, thereby ensuring that vibration impacts would be less than significant. Blasting operations could also generate peak vibration levels that could impact residences. Vibration levels from blasting are a function of the blasting charge weight, the distance from the receptors and the types and characteristics of the soil and rock. CalTrans (CalTRANS 2006) have detailed calculations and historical “blast curves” to estimate the vibration levels from a range of blasting events. Blast impacts, depending on the weight of the charge used and the levels of confinement”, have the potential to produce impacts to nearby residences (the Mobile Home park) at vibration levels above the significance thresholds and be considered significant impacts. The main issue with blast vibration is the perception of some residents that, because they could hear and feel the blast vibration, the vibration must have caused some damage to their residence. However, it is unusual to find damage to residences from blast vibration (CalTRANS 2004). Large vehicles can also increase ground vibration along streets on which they travel, although those vibration levels would be substantially less than those from a pile driver. Vibration is a function of vehicle speed and the condition of the pavement. CalTrans indicates that “vehicles traveling on a smooth roadway are rarely, if ever, the source of perceptible ground vibration” and that “vibration from vehicle operations is almost always the result of pavement discontinuities, the solution is to smooth the pavement to eliminate the discontinuities” (CalTrans 2004). Truck travel on area roadways could cause vibrations at nearby residences if roadways are not maintained. CalTrans (CalTrans 2004) also indicates that the probability of exceeding architectural damage criteria for continuous vibrations from freeway traffic is practically non-existent. However, if vibration concerns involve pavement breaking, extensive pile driving, or trains, 25 ft or less from normal residences, buildings, or unreinforced structures, damage is a real possibility. The highest traffic generated vibrations measured on freeway shoulders have never exceeded [0.08 inch/s], with the worst combinations of heavy trucks (CalTrans 2006). This amplitude coincides with the maximum recommended “safe amplitude” for ruins and ancient monuments (and historical buildings). Truck vibrations from the proposed Project along area roadways would be substantially less than those anticipated from freeway traffic speeds and would therefore have less than significant impacts on residences and historical buildings. Mitigation Measures N-2 Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit a blasting plan for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building for all blasting activities at the site that includes: 1. Informing the public about the Project and potential blasting-related consequences; 2. Scheduling the work to reduce adverse effects; 3. Designing the blast to reduce vibration and air over pressure including limiting the size of blasting charges and confinement to the minimum feasible; 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4. Using blast signals to notify nearby residents that blasting is imminent; 5. Monitoring and recording the vibration and air overpressure effects of the blast; 6. Responding to and investigating complaints; 7. If complaints are received, blasting shall not resume until it has been determined whether an adaptive blasting strategy needs to be implemented; and 8. Providing formal notification to all sensitive receptors (including residential and office) within 1000 feet of the Project area prior to commencing the blasting or rock crushing operation. The notification should identify potential noise, work hours and time frame, and contact information. Residual Impacts By implementing a blasting plan to ensure that blasting activities minimize impacts on residences, impacts would be less than significant. The implementation of mitigation measure N- 1a requires that the crushing operations be at least 1,500 feet from any residence or equivalent, thereby ensuring that vibration impacts from crushing operations would also be less than significant. If noise reducing measures are applied, vibration calculations would be performed to ensure that vibration impacts would remain below the applicable thresholds. Impacts would therefore be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.8.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The development of the area could increase noise levels due to construction activities and due to increased traffic on area roadways during the operational phase of the City Development Plan component of the Project. Each of these is addressed below. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact N.3 Construction activities associated with the construction of the City Development Plan could increase noise levels in the area. Development Class II Noise would be generated by a number of different construction equipment operating at different times during the construction of the City Development Plan phase of the Project. The peak activities that could produce the peak off-site noise levels would be associated with activities on the east end of the Project Site, such as activities during Phase 1 located immediately west of the Mobile Home park. Activities at these locations would include minor grading, building construction, and paving activities. Noise levels off-site were estimated utilizing the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model FHWA 2006). Equipment numbers were used based on information in Chapter 2.0, Project Description. Construction activities at the far east end of the Project Site north of Tank Farm Road would generate Leq noise levels at the Mobile Home park of 68.7 dBA, which would be below the intermittent, short-term allowable noise level for mobile equipment of 75 dBA during daytime hours. None of the construction activities would utilize stationary equipment. Impacts 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR would therefore be less than significant. However, mitigation measures N-1a, N-1b, and N-1c would still be applicable as construction equipment, if not properly maintained or operated during hours that are outside of the allowable hours in the Municipal Code, could produce significant impacts. Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures N-1a, N-1b, and N-1c would be applicable. Residual Impacts Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact N.4 Off-site City Development Plan-related traffic would generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Development Class III Traffic levels at full build-out (after Phase 5) would increase on area streets. Traffic would be composed of both automobiles and trucks, as specified in Section 4.3, Transportation and Circulation. This increase in traffic along area streets would increase noise levels due to the increased traffic. Traffic noise levels at intersections with the proposed Project traffic are shown in Table 4.8-10. Increases in traffic would increase noise levels at 100 feet from the roadways by up to 0.5 dBA. This increase would be below the 3 dBA increase specified in the significance thresholds, and would therefore be less than significant. Although the noise levels associated with traffic would be above the 60 dBA specified as the upper limit of transportation-related noise levels at receptors, the traffic routes would be associated with traffic along arterial roadways and would not impact residential collector streets or local streets. Impacts would therefore be less than significant (Class III). Table 4.8-10 Roadway Noise Levels: With Project Roadway Segment Noise at 100 feet, CNEL Increase Noise at 100 feet, CNEL Distance to Noise Contour, feet increased distance with Project) 60 CNEL 65 CNEL 70 CNEL Tank Farm Rd. West of Broad St. (Hwy 227) 66.9 0.4 49 (4) 157 (13) 495 (40) Tank Farm Rd. West of Santa Fe Rd. 67.1 0.5 51 (6) 162 (18) 512 (56) S. Higuera St. at Los Osos Valley Rd. 68.3 0.2 67 (3) 212 (9) 671 (29) Broad (SR 227) North of Tank Farm Rd. 66.5 0.2 45 (-) 141 (5) 447 (17) U.S. Highway 101 at Los Osos Valley Rd. 77.8 0.3 600 (42) 1897 (132) 6000 (418) FHWA Model Calculated Values: Traffic Levels with Project Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts The impacts would be less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact N.5 Development within the ALUP single-event noise contours could cause the development to be exposed to unacceptable noise levels. Development Class II The ALUP requires mitigation for projects that propose development within the noise contours associated with the airport operations. The noise contours are define in Figure 2 of the ALUP. Some portions of the Project would be potentially placed within these noise contours, specifically portions of the City Development Plan (Tentative Tract Map, Lot 1, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18 and portions of 6 and 14 within the 75 dBA contour and all or most of the remaining plots within the 65 dBA contour). Development within these areas, including offices, hotels, restaurants, would require additional attenuation built in to the construction design in order to ensure that indoor noise levels are below the ALUP standards. Failure to address these issues would result in a significant impact. Mitigation Measures N-5 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall incorporate noise reduction measures into the development design (i.e., extra insulation or thicker walls, window design) for all applicable land uses that would be located within the ALUP noise contours (Tentative Tract Map, Lot 1, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18 and portions of 6 and 14 within the 75 dBA contour and all or most of the remaining plots within the 65 dBA contour). Noise mitigation shall result in noise levels being at or below acceptable levels specified in the ALUP. Noise reduction measures shall clearly be identified with construction permit applications. Residual Impacts The incorporation of attenuation into the building design would ensure that noise levels for buildings located within the ALUP noise contours are acceptable. The required mitigation levels are a function of the specific land use. For example, only extremely sensitive (residential) and moderately sensitive (offices) land uses are required to provide attenuation if they are within the specific noise contours. Industrial developments are not required to provide mitigation. Therefore, only the business park areas (lots 14, 15 and 16) within the 75 dBA single-event contours would require attenuations of 15-25 dBA. All other business park areas would require attenuations of 5 to 15 dBA. Noise impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.8.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impacts from the County Development Plan portion of the Project would be similar to the impacts from the City Development Plan as the phasing, construction requirements and land use mix would be the same. The differences between the two Projects would be that the business park and service commercial developments would be located on slightly smaller acreages (but 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR with the same square footages), and there would be the construction and operation of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). A WWTP can produce noise impacts on areas due primarily to pump operations associated with the treatment of wastewater. The WWTP would be located more than 1,000 feet from the closest residence (the Mobile Home Park). Impacts from pump noises could potentially generate impacts more than 1,000 feet from the pump location during the nighttime, when the County Noise Element requires that noise levels be below 45 dBA at night hourly average. This could be a significant impact. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact N.6 Development -related industrial noise from the WWTP could generate noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Development Class II Pump noise associated with the WWTP could produce noise levels above the nighttime Municipal Code allowable levels at nearby residential receptors. Depending on the pump type and configuration, pump noise could produce noise levels in excess of 50 dBA at the Mobile Home Park residential area. This would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation Measures N-6 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall ensure the WWTP implements noise mitigation systems on all equipment that could generate noise levels in exceedance of the Code levels at nearby receptors. Mitigation systems shall include, but not be limited to, noise barriers and sound walls or buildings. Monitoring of noise levels shall be instituted to ensure that noise levels are below the applicable codes. Follow-up noise mitigation shall be implemented if initial measures are not fully successful in reducing noise levels to below night-time noise levels at the eastern property line. Residual Impacts Since industry-related noise can often impact sensitive receptors, many mitigation methods are available to reduce this noise, including walls, engine exhaust silencers, mufflers, acoustical equipment enclosures, noise-absorbing blankets and padding, and sound-dampening flooring and siding materials. Properly installed acoustical materials can reduce noise by up to 40 dB, averaged over the frequency range. The noise-reducing efficiency of insulating and acoustical materials is greater for higher frequency noise. For example, sound with a frequency of 4,000 Hz could be reduced as much as 50 to 60 dB by the same materials that would reduce 125 Hz frequency noise by less than 10 dB. Therefore, the choice of material and noise barrier design are functions of the type of equipment generating the noise. A sound transmission class (STC) number, expressed as a frequency, rates insulating and noise barrier material as an average decibel loss across several sound frequencies. The stated STC for a 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR given material is generally the maximum decibel reduction achievable with a perfect enclosure. Table 4.8-11 lists several barrier materials and their STC ratings. Table 4.8-11 Sound Loss by Various Noise Barrier Materials Sound Transmission Class of Materials STC (dB) Concrete, 12 inches thick 53 Concrete block wall, unpainted 44 Metal panel, 4 inches thick (solid and perforated) 41 Metal panel, 2 inches thick (solid and perforated) 35 Fiberglass curtain, 2 inches with barrier of 2.5 pounds per square foot 33 Steel wall, 3/16 inch thick 31 Gypsum wallboard, 5/8 inch thick 30 Fiberglass curtain, 1 inch, barrier of 1.3 pounds per square foot 27 Wood door, solid core, closed 27 Plasterboard, 3/8 inch 26 Barrier material, density of 1.5 pounds per square foot 27 Barrier material, density of 2.5 pounds per square foot 33 Steel, 22-gauge 25 Note: STC = Sound Transmission Class, a single number rating derived from decibel loss data at several frequencies. Source: Smock & Schonthaler Implementation of noise mitigation could achieve noise levels at the closest residence that would be below the requirements. Impacts would therefore be less than significant with mitigation Class II). 4.8.7 Cumulative Analysis None of the proposed development found under the cumulative projects list (see Chapter 3.0, Cumulative Scenario and Methodology) would be constructed or operated near the Project area so there would be no cumulative noise impacts associated with stationary cumulative projects. Cumulative projects would increase traffic levels on area arterials and major roadways. This increase in traffic would increase noise levels in the area. However, policies direct that the noise level standards should be used as criteria for limiting traffic growth on residential and local streets only. As the traffic increases associated with the cumulative projects would be primarily on the arterial and major streets, and noise-related impacts to residential and local streets would be nominal, impacts would be less than significant. 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.8.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.8.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party N-1a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that the crushing plant is located at least 1,500 feet away from any residential receptor or an equivalent distance or is treated with some other form of acoustical mitigation (e.g., located within an enclosure) to ensure noise levels at the closest residential receptor are below 60 dBA. The location of the crushing plant shall be identified on the site plan for the grading permit. If noise reducing measures are applied instead of increased distances, vibration calculations shall be performed to demonstrate that vibration impacts would remain below the applicable thresholds Review of remediation design documents and equipment siting. Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit County Planning and Building N-1b The Applicant shall ensure that all construction activity at the Project Site (including deliveries and arriving and departing workers) is limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and prohibit activities on Saturdays, Sundays and federal holidays. If activities outside this timeframe occur, noise monitoring shall be established to demonstrate that applicable noise codes are not exceeded. This shall be a note placed on all construction plans. Review of remediation design documents and contracts with construction contractors. Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit County Planning and Building N-1c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, and throughout construction, the Applicant shall ensure that all construction machinery is maintained according to the manufacturers’ specifications and ensure that mufflers and silencers are maintained properly. Back-up OSHA noise indicators shall be ambient sensitive and self-adjusting to minimize backup indicator noise or flaggers shall be used in the place of backup alarms (as allowed by OSHA) Review of remediation design documents and contracts with construction contractors. Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit County Planning and Building 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party N-1d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall provide formal notification to all sensitive receptors (including residential and office) within 1,000 feet of the Project area prior to commencing the blasting or rock crushing operation. The notification should identify potential noise, work hours and time frame, and contact information. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the notice and a list of addresses to where the notice was sent (see N-2). Review of blasting plan Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit County Planning and Building and City Fire Department in conjunction with City Community Developmen t N-2 Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall submit a blasting plan for review and approval by San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building for all blasting activities at the site that includes: 1. Informing the public about the Project and potential blasting-related consequences; 2. Scheduling the work to reduce adverse effects; 3. Designing the blast to reduce vibration and air over pressure including limiting the size of blasting charges and confinement to the minimum feasible; 4. Using blast signals to notify nearby residents that blasting is imminent; 5. Monitoring and recording the vibration and air overpressure effects of the blast; 6. Responding to and investigating complaints; 7. If complaints are received, blasting shall not resume until it has been determined whether an adaptive blasting strategy needs to be implemented; and 8. Providing formal notification to all sensitive receptors (including residential and office) within 1000 feet of the Project area prior to commencing the blasting or rock crushing operation. The notification should identify potential noise, work hours and time frame, and contact information. Review of remediation design documents and contracts with construction contractors. Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit County Planning and Building and City Fire Department in conjunction with City Community Developmen t 4.8 Noise and Vibration December 2013 4.8-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.8.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation measures associated with remediation, N-1a through N-1c, would be applicable to construction activities associated with the City Development Plan. Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party N-5 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall incorporate noise reduction measures into the development design (i.e., extra insulation or thicker walls, window design) for all applicable land uses that would be located within the ALUP noise contours (Tentative Tract Map, Lot 1, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18 and portions of 6 and 14 within the 75 dBA contour and all or most of the remaining plots within the 65 dBA contour). Noise mitigation shall result in noise levels being at or below acceptable levels specified in the ALUP. Noise reduction measures shall clearly be identified with construction permit applications... Review of development design documents and contracts with construction contractors. Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit City Development Department 4.8.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation measures associated with remediation, N-1a through N-1c, would be applicable to construction activities associated with the County Development Plan. Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party N-5 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall ensure that noise mitigation is incorporated into the development design (i.e., extra insulation or thicker walls, window design) for all applicable land uses that would be located within the ALUP noise contours and to the attenuation levels specified in the ALUP, to ensure that indoor noise levels are acceptable. Review of development design documents and contracts with construction contractors. Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit County Planning and Building 4.8 Noise and Vibration Chevron Tank Farm 4.8-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party N-6 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall ensure the WWTP implements noise mitigation systems on all equipment that could generate noise levels in exceedance of the Code levels at nearby receptors. Mitigation systems shall include, but not be limited to, noise barriers and sound walls or buildings. Monitoring of noise levels shall be instituted to ensure that noise levels are below the applicable codes. Follow-up noise mitigation shall be implemented if initial measures are not fully successful in reducing noise levels to below night-time noise levels at the eastern property line. Review of remediation WWTP design documents and contracts with construction contractors. Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit County Planning and Building 4.8.9 References CalTrans. 1998,Technical Noise Supplement to the Technical Noise Analysis Protocol, October 2004. Transportation- and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual, June 2004 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 2006. Transit noise and vibration impact assessment. Washington, D.C. http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FTA_Noise_and_Vibration_Manual.pdf FHWA. 1998. Traffic Noise Model, February 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model Users Guide, 2006, FHWA-HEP-05-054 Fidell, L. Silvati, K. Pearsons, S. Lind, and R. Howe. 1999. Field study of the annoyance of low- frequency runway sideline noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(3):1408{1415, 1999. Radle, A.L. 2007. The Effect of Noise on Wildlife: A Literature Review. World Forum for Acoustic Ecology, University of Oregon. March 2, 2007. San Luis Obispo County. 1992. Noise Element. May 1992. 2005. Regional Airport Land Use Plan. Adopted 1973, Amended May 18, 2005. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology This section evaluates potential impacts to cultural resources including archaeological, historic, and paleontological resources within the Project Site. Cultural resources represent and document activities, accomplishments, and traditions of previous civilizations and link current and former inhabitants of an area. Archaeological resources include areas where prehistoric or historic activity measurably altered the earth or deposits of physical remains (e.g., arrowheads, bottles) discovered therein. Architectural resources include standing buildings, districts, bridges, and other structures of historic or aesthetic significance. Paleontological resources (fossils) are the remains or traces of prehistoric animals and plants, generally accepted to be more than 10,000 years old (SVP 1995). Fossils are important scientific and educational resources because they: 1) document the presence and evolutionary history of particular groups of organisms, many of which are now extinct; 2) enable the environments in which these organisms lived to be reconstructed; 3) allow the relative ages of the strata in which they occur to be determined; and 4) record geologic events that caused the sediments in which they were buried to be deposited. The evaluation contained in this section is based on the following technical documents which were either supplied by the Applicant or prepared for this EIR: An Archaeological Surface Survey at the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, prepared by Thor Conway in 2008. Paleontological Identification and Evaluation Report for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Redevelopment Project, prepared by Brady and Associates Geological Services in 2010. Archaeological Phase II Testing and Evaluation at the Chevron Tank Farm, prepared by Garcia and Associates (GANDA) (Denardo and Greenlee 2011). Updated Eligibility Recommendations for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, prepared by GANDA (Denardo and Greenlee 2012). Additional Archaeological Phase II Testing and Evaluationat the Chevron San Luis ObispoTank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California, prepared by GANDA (Denardo et al. 2013). Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1.7 Acres in the Caldwell Quarry Property, San Luis Obispo County, California, prepared by Garcia and Associates, December 2012. Archaeological Survey Report: Five Acres in the Quarry Area, San Luis Obispo, California, prepared by Garcia and Associates, December 2012. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR These reports are not included in the Appendices of this EIR due to sensitivity of report content; they are, however, on file with the County Department of Planning and Building and City Community Development Department. Following the Phase I surface survey, Conway opined that “Each of the archaeological features at the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm requires subsurface testing to provide boundary definition, an assessment of the feature’s significance and further evaluation of the resource” (2008:36). Responding to that recommendation, the Applicant retained Garcia and Associates (GANDA) to prepare a Research Design for Phase II Subsurface Testing at Chevron’s San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. That document proposed to assess the historical significance of the previously recorded archaeological property identified as P-40- 041195 (the Union Oil Company Tank Farm), comprised of some 57 historic archaeological features, approximately 287 historic isolated finds, and several prehistoric isolated finds. The Phase II work plan focused on approximately 35 historic archaeological features, one prehistoric feature, seven groups of historic isolated finds, and two prehistoric isolated finds that are likely to be impacted by Project-related ground disturbance. GANDA proposed more thorough documentation and/or subsurface testing at each of these locations to further define their boundaries and content and to assess their historical significance according to the requirements of CEQA. The Phase II work plan was peer reviewed by the City, County, and EIR consultant team, and was subsequently implemented by GANDA to determine which features were eligible to the California Register of Historical Resources and how they would be impacted by the proposed Project. The Phase II archaeological study was restricted to areas where soil disturbances would occur as the result of the proposed remediation and restoration activities. Other archaeological features that would be avoided during Project development are to be addressed in a long-term management plan. 4.9.1 Environmental Setting 4.9.1.1 Regional Geology and Paleontology The Project area lies on the western slope of the Santa Lucia Range within the central Coast Range Geomorphic Province. Geologically, the underlying rocks form a locally unique assemblage known as the Santa Maria basin (Hall 2007).The Santa Maria basin was formed by right-lateral, strike-slip faulting and concurrent deposition of marine sediments in a subsiding, fault-bounded depression during over several million years in mid-Tertiary time. A change in the tectonic regime resulted in regional compression, forming large-scale folds and reverse faults, and later uplift and tilting related to the tectonics of the present transpressional continental margin. The Santa Maria basin is floored by Mesozoic rocks of the Franciscan complex, Coast Range ophiolite, and Great Valley sequence. Around the margins of the basin (and within it) are thick sections of marine and non-marine sedimentary rocks ranging in age from upper Oligocene through Pleistocene, many of which are fossiliferous. The thickness of the deformed fill in the central part of the basin probably approaches 15,000 feet. The region is structurally complex, consisting of sub-parallel northwest-southeast trending faults and folds, and tilted blocks. These structures form deep canyons and steep mountain ranges 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR which in places extend to the coastline. Many of the faults and folds are active, producing surface displacement in the marine and fluvial terraces, offset stream courses, and abrupt mountain fronts (Hall and Prior 1975). The Pleistocene history of the Project area is marked by glacially controlled sea level fluctuations and tectonic uplift during which the shoreline advanced and retreated as much as 30 miles across the continental shelf (Hall 2007). Sea level advance cut a system of marine terraces, 12 of which are exposed in the Point San Luis area 8-9 miles southwest of the Project Site. These terraces range in age from 83,000 to 49,000 years, and reach elevations of 79 feet above modern sea level. The formations that compose these terraces are the most paleontologically productive in the region. The only fossil resources likely to occur at the Project Site are of Quaternary (Pleistocene) age. The Quaternary is the most recent of the three Periods of the Cenozoic Era in the geologic time scale. It follows the Tertiary Period, spanning from about 2,588,000 years ago to the present. The Quaternary includes two geologic epochs: the older Pleistocene--sometimes known as the Ice Ages"-- and the younger Holocene, which began approximately 10,000 ybp (years before present). The Pleistocene epoch began approximately 1,800,000 ybp. On the basis of vertebrate fauna from the nonmarine, late Cenozoic deposits in the San Francisco Bay region, two major divisions of Pleistocene-age fossils are recognized in California: the older Irvingtonian and the younger Rancholabrean (Woodburne 2004). The Rancholabrean fauna includes bison and other large mammals such as mammoths, mastodons, camels, horses, and ground sloths, as well as other species alive today. Jefferson et al. (1992) reported three vertebrate localities along the coast within 9 miles of the Project Site. These localities occur in Pleistocene fluvial deposits overlying marine terraces, and include assemblages of the Rancholabrean mammals Equus sp. and E. occidentalis (horse); Camelops sp. and C. hesternus (camel); Bison antiquus and B. latifrons (bison), and Mammut americanum (mammoth). Other, more distal localities in San Luis Obispo County are noted as well (University of California Berkeley database). The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History (LACM) data base records mastodon Mammutidae) remains recovered 16 miles northwest of the Project Site, northwest of Morro Bay and just north of Chorro Creek in stream gravels at a depth of 6 feet (LACM 5903). A specimen of mammoth (Mammuthus) was recovered 12 miles southeast of the Project Site from a shallow depth in Arroyo Grande Creek east of Lopez Lake (LACM 5790) (Brady 2008). 4.9.1.2 Prehistory Archaeological evidence demonstrates that Native American groups have occupied the Central Coast for at least 10,000 years. A refined chronology of this period in the Central Coast area Jones 2007; Jones et al. 1994, 2009; Jones and Waugh 1995) divides that time frame into seven periods – Paleoindian/Paleocoastal (10,000 to 8,000 B.C.), Millingstone (8,000 B.C. to 3,500 B.C.), Early Period (3,500 B.C. to 600 B.C.), Middle Period (600 B.C. to 1,000 A.D.), Middle/Late Transition (A.D. 1,000 to 1250), and Late/Protohistoric (A.D. to 1250-1769). 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The earliest evidence of human occupation in the region comes from archaeological sites along the coast (Breschini and Haversat 1982; Greenwood 1972). Following Davis et al. (1969), Moratto (1984) used the term Paleocoastal to refer to coastal occupations preceding those with milling technology. Assemblages associated with this tradition contain various flaked stone tools but lack ground stone implements. Sites containing remains of this tradition are extremely rare. Moratto (1984: 108) suggested that the lowest levels of two local sites, CA-SLO-2 and CA-SLO-585, contain such components; Erlandson (1994) added CA-SBA-931 to that short list. One researcher postulates that these groups descended from local Paleoindians who developed adaptations to marine resources (Erlandson 1994). Jones et al. (2008) tentatively identified four discrete occupational components at CA-SLO-2 spanning the past 10,000 years (between 8300 B.C. and A.D. 1769), making it the second oldest coastal midden on the California mainland (older sites are known on the Channel Islands; Erlandson 1991, 1994; Orr 1968).Greenwood (1972) reports milling implements associated with a radiocarbon date of 8410 +/- 190 B.P. at CA-SLO-585 and proposes that milling equipment was used earlier along the coast than previously believed. Findings at CA-SLO-1797 (the Cross Creek Site) and CA-SLO-1756 (the Salinas River Crossing Site) for the Coastal Branch Aqueduct, Phase II (Fitzgerald 1998, 2000) lend support to Greenwood’s (1972) interpretation. Both sites show affinity with the Milling Stone Culture recognized in central and northern California (Fitzgerald 1993, 2000; McGuire and Hildebrandt 1994; True et al. 1979). Radiocarbon dates recovered from CA-SLO-1797, in particular, suggest that use of milling equipment in San Luis Obispo County occurred as early as 10,300 BP. (Fitzgerald 1998, 2000). Sites with well-developed middens, suggesting more stable settlements, first appeared during the Millingstone Period, between 8000 and 3500 B.C. (Breschini et al. 1983). Many sites in the region date to this period. Ground stone milling tools, dominated by handstones and milling slabs, composes a significant portion of artifact assemblages, suggesting that procuring small seeds was an important subsistence activity (Glassow et al. 1988). However, archaeological deposits at CA-SLO-165 in Morro Bay reflect a diet dominated by fish and shellfish (Jones et al. 1994:189). Erlandson (1988, 1991) reports an emphasis on seeds and shellfish for the Santa Barbara/Vandenberg AFB region, Glassow (1992) proposes that marine mammals and fish were preferred, and Wallace (1978) theorizes that terrestrial mammals were the primary focus. Jones et al. (1994:189) suggest that these discrepancies likely reflect increased mobility between maritime and inland settings during this period. Scholars argue about the impetus for the adaptive shift into the Early Period (3500-600 B.C.) Jones 2004). Some contend that immigrants from western Alaska, eastern California, or the Channel Islands brought new technologies to the Central Coast (Harrison 1964; Warren 1968; Lathrop and Trioke 1984), while others attribute the change to technological evolution by local inhabitants (Glassow 1997; Erlandson 1997). Changes in invertebrate faunal remains at sites near major coastal estuaries reflect climatic changes along California’s coastline, including rising sea levels, at the beginning of this period. An increase in Pismo clams and other sandy shore shellfish at CA-SLO-165 (Morro Bay) (Mikkelsen et al. 2000) and CA-SLO-877 (San Luis Obispo Bay) suggests that rising sea levels replaced rocky intertidal zones with sandy beaches. Archaeological deposits near Elkhorn Slough, a prominent estuary farther north on Monterey Bay, show a major occupational hiatus during this time, suggesting that this habitat was substantially altered (Jones and Jones 1992; Patch and Jones 1984). Adaptive responses to 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR expanded population and constricted land use are evident in settlement changes. Sites dating to this period evince more settled, but not permanent, occupation and increased logistical organization for procurement activities such as hunting, fishing, and specialized processing Jones et al. 1994:62; Jones and Waugh 1995:132). Major technological innovations occur during this period, including introduction of the mortar and pestle, an increase in marine hunting equipment, and the tomol, or plank canoe. This period also saw the development of interregional exchange, reflected by a dramatic increase in shell beads and obsidian. Between 600 B.C. and A.D. 1000 (the Middle Period), there is continued subsistence intensification and an increase in technological and economic complexity. Changes during this period include an increase in diet breadth (with an emphasis on fish and nuts crops), greater exploitation of seasonal resources, initial efforts at food storage (Glassow and Wilcoxon 1988; King 1990a), and adoption of the bow and arrow. Marked changes in ornaments and other artifacts during this time have prompted some researchers to argue that social ranking and status differentiation became more pronounced (King 1990a). However, others contend that prominent changes in socioeconomic complexity did not occur until later (Arnold 1992; Jones and Waugh 1995). Increases in the quantity and diversity of obsidian and bead artifacts suggest that trade networks were used regularly during this time. The beginning of the second millennium is marked by a progressive decline in climatic conditions. The Middle/Late Transition period (between A.D. 1000 and 1250) in the Santa Barbara Channel region is associated with the rapid emergence of complex social and political organizations and craft specialization. These changes are likely part of an adaptive response to environmental degradation and rising population densities. Arnold (1992) speculates that elevated ocean temperatures circa A.D. 1150 led to a decline in maritime activities, which in turn prompted the emergence of craft specialization. Evidence for analogous sociopolitical changes in the northern Chumash region is absent at this time; however, lacking the opportunity for maritime intensification available in the channel region, effects of the changing environment farther north are reflected by a shift in settlement practices away from the coast as populations focused on inland resources (Jones and Waugh 1995:132; Lebow 2000). In addition, exchange relationships deteriorated during this time as evidenced by the absence of imported obsidian after A.D. 1000 (Jones et al. 1994). Jones and Waugh (1995:13) suggest intergroup hostilities during this period based on evidence from burials at CA-SLO-175. The archaeological record for the Late Period/Protohistoric (A.D. 1250-A.D. 1769) is highly variable along the Central Coast. In the Santa Barbara region, large permanent villages mark the shoreline and trade was extensive between the mainland and the Channel Islands. This period also is marked by increasing social and political complexity resulting in a complete economic reorganization to regulate the growing Chumash society (King 1990a:106). Artifact assemblages associated with this period are not well defined farther north, and the lack of radiocarbon dates limits assessments of occupation length (Jones et al. 1994:183). However, investigations suggest that the San Luis Obispo coastal region underwent a major transformation in land use during this time. Both CA-SLO-175 (Little Pico Creek) and CA-SLO-165 (Morro Bay) show evidence of a decrease in occupation after A.D. 1250 (Jones et al. 1994; Jones and Waugh 1995). Other sites, including CA-SBA-2767, CA-SLO-1303 (Jones et al. 1994), CA-SLO-7, CA-SLO-8, and 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CA-SLO-2 (Breschini and Haversat 1988; Greenwood 1972), contain assemblages that similarly reflect intensive short-term occupation for procurement of specialized resources. Farther north, in the Big Sur and Monterey regions, this pattern is mirrored by the abandonment of residential bases along the coast for locations farther inland. Jones and Waugh (1995:132) surmise that this shift represents a dietary change and a greater reliance on storable commodities like acorns. 4.9.1.3 Ethnography San Luis Obispo is within the area historically occupied by the Northern (Obispeño) Chumash, the northernmost of the Chumash people of California (Gibson 1991; Greenwood 1978; Kroeber 1976). The Northern Chumash occupied land from the Pacific coast east to the Coast Ranges and from the Santa Maria River north to approximately Point Estero. Chumash material culture, social organization, traditions and rituals, and cosmology have been described by many scholars including Blackburn (1975), Grant (1993), Greenwood (1978), Hudson and Blackburn (1982– 1987), Hudson and Underhay (1978), Hudson et al. (1978), Johnson (1988), King (1990), Woodman et al. (1991). Various lines of historical and archaeological evidence indicate that the general population density in the northern Chumash region was far less at the time of contact than in earlier prehistoric times, and the native population at Mission San Luis Obispo was never as high as at the more southerly missions at Santa Barbara, Lompoc, and Santa Ynez (Greenwood 1978). The Indian population at Mission San Luis Obispo reached its peak of 919 in 1803, as most of the Northern Chumash abandoned their native villages and moved into the mission or its outposts. By the time of secularization in 1834, missionization, disease, and destruction of the native subsistence base had forced the Chumash to give up most of their traditional lifeways. Only 170 Chumash remained at the mission in 1838. Trade was an important and fairly common practice for Northern Chumash and their neighbors, the Purisimeño the south and Salinan to the north. Chumash groups traded for pottery and obsidian toolstone from the inland Yokuts (Greenwood 1978:523), while the Salinans traded with the Yokuts for salt, obsidian, hides, and freshwater fish (Hester 1978:500). Trade relationships afforded groups friendly access to otherwise unobtainable resources. For example, the Yokuts allowed coastal groups to fish the lakes in their territory; in return, Chumash and Salinan groups provided access to the ocean shoreline (Greenwood 19787:523; Hester 1978:500). Most of what is known about prehistoric settlement patterns has been derived from archaeological evidence. It appears Northern Chumash groups lived in permanent villages along the coast and major inland drainages but not in the rugged Coast Range (Greenwood 1978:520– 521). However, task-specific sites likely occurred in the mountains and along minor seasonal creeks and streams. Chumash housing seems to have included small round structures with domed roofs and some evidence for subterranean construction (Greenwood 1978:521). Landberg 1965:26) states that Chumash villages typically consisted of several dome-shaped houses built from poles and grass thatching, and one or more sweathouses. In addition, evidence also suggests that twin or split villages encountered on either side streams or other features may reflect the sociopolitical complexity of a half (moiety) system of kinship based on two unilateral descent 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR groups that together make up a tribe or society (Greenwood 1978:521). The limited information available on Northern Chumash subsistence is derived from Mission Period practices that imply a hunting and gathering lifestyle. The primary vegetal food was acorns; hunting was focused on large and small game such as deer, bear, and rabbit (Greenwood 1978:522). However, prior to missionization, they likely used a rich array of maritime resources, as evidenced by C-shaped shell fishhooks, bone awls, notched pebble net sinkers, and other materials recovered from coastal sites. Conversely a great deal is known about other Chumash groups, particularly those along the Santa Barbara Channel (Barbareño), who enjoyed marine resources over a long period of time (Grant 1978:509-512; Greenwood 1978:522). Balsa and plank canoes provided the channel Chumash with transportation to outlying resources, although no evidence of canoe use by the Obispeño has been encountered (Landberg 1965:3). Harvesting and fishing techniques were used to recover shoreline and tide pool fish species. Fishing was accomplished using J-shaped and circular shell hooks, nets, traps, and poles (Greenwood 1978:522). Ground stone implements and projectile points recovered from Chumash sites indicate hunting and collecting also were important subsistence activities. Plant and animal resources, and possibly external relations, likely drew prehistoric peoples to the interior coastal areas like San Luis Obispo. Chumash groups used both coiling and twining methods to manufacture baskets for collecting, preparing, and serving food; they used similar techniques to make hats (Grant 1978:517). The Chumash used beads to decorate baskets (Greenwood 1978:522). Steatite apparently was an important material, especially along the coast; fewer steatite objects have been found in areas away from the coast. Additionally, of the Chumash played bone or wooden musical instruments Greenwood 1978:523). The decimation of Indian populations and disintegration of prehistoric cultures as a result of missionization is a profound event in the history of the coastal region (Greenwood 1978: 523). Much information was lost as a result, and the old records available from the missions do not provide great insight into pre-mission lifestyles of the Chumash, groups of the coastal region. 4.9.1.4 History Spanish Incursion — The Mission Era (1772 to 1850) The era of Chumash contact with Europeans began with the initial Spanish exploration of California in 1542. In 1769 the Portolá expedition traveled overland from San Diego to Monterey, journeyed inland to Morro Bay, and passed through the San Luis Obispo area again on their return voyage in 1770. Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa, founded in 1772, was the first Spanish establishment in Chumash territory. The first structures at the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa were a temporary church constructed of timber and tule, a granary, and a log-and-tule house for the soldiers of the mission guard. In 1773, Francisco Palóu brought five families of Baja California Indians to the mission, and huts were erected to house them. A new church was built in 1774. A newly constructed aqueduct emptied into a large reservoir that was supposedly located “near the settlement, at the right of the road now called Monterey Street,” but “was filled with debris when a street was cut through next to it” (The Monitor 1938). 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR After several fires, a new church was completed in 1793 (see Figure 4.9-1); it still stands today, dominating the landscape of Mission Plaza along Chorro Street. A cemetery lies outside of the eastern wall of the chapel. Scholars estimate that more than 2,600 Native Americans and a few Hispanics were buried in this cemetery before it was closed shortly after 1853. Additions to the eastern side of the church in 1893 and 1948 uncovered burials and Native American artifacts within the projected cemetery area (Tognazzini 1993, Kocher 1972). The mission garden (or vineyard) was south of San Luis Obispo Creek and surrounded by a stone wall that roughly followed Broad, Buchon, and Santa Rosa Streets. This was the second-largest vineyard in the California mission chain, with 44.66 acres of grapes planted prior to 1800 Bertrando and Bertrando 2003, Kocher 1972). Other construction projects completed in the 1790s included living quarters for the padres, dwellings and workshops for five guards and their families, and the first grist mill (Kocher 1972, Webb 1952). The water-powered mill was supposedly located “farther up Monterey Street from the large reservoir, to the left of the road and by the side of San Luis Creek” (The Monitor 1938). Another source pinpoints the mill’s location on San Luis Obispo Creek “where the White House now stands.” The White House, built in 1912, was located at 860 Higuera Street. When the mill remains were uncovered, one millstone purportedly was still lying by the creek, and the old mill had a “fine stone floor” (Mission San Luis Obispo 1937). Figure 4.9-1 Drawing of Mission San Luis Obispo, 1793 In 1800, Father Martinez began an aggressive construction program that would complete and beautify the Mission quadrangle. Construction over the next 11 years included a weaving room, a wall to enclose the quadrangle, more than 80 permanent Mission Indian houses (measuring 20 feet by 17 feet) made of adobe and roofed with clay tiles, dormitories, a hospital, a second grist 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR mill, additional reservoirs, a community kitchen, two granaries, and a corral (Englehardt 1933; Kocher 1972; Mitchell 1930; The Monitor 1938; Webb 1952). Because there are no known maps of the Mission facilities, the exact location of these structures is unknown. However, construction and archaeological work in the City has uncovered pieces to this puzzle. Most recently, a portion of one of the Mission reservoirs was uncovered on Chorro Street, between Palm and Mill Streets, during trenching for a sewer line lateral (Bertrando 2007). A portion of the Mission’s orchard wall was uncovered near the Broad Street northbound on-ramp to U.S. Highway 101. The Mission Indian housing was described as two low rows of buildings along both sides of Chorro Street. One row of these dwellings formed the outer wall of the cemetery, and the dwellings are purported to have remained in place until 1875. A simple adobe wall with a gateway to the cemetery connected this row of Indian houses with the vestibule, or portico, of the church building (Monitor 1938). When the Quintana Building later the Blackstone Hotel) was constructed in 1876, remains that have been identified as Mission-era soap and tallow vats were reportedly uncovered near the entrance of 986 Chorro Street (Webb 1952). The beginning of the nineteenth century also marked the zenith of the Mission Indian population at San Luis Obispo, with 961 Native Americans residing there in 1805 (Mission San Luis Obispo 1937). The Mission grounds were further expanded to accommodate this population. Expansion of the Mission grounds included a large olive grove, likely planted around 1810, between Higuera Street and the low marshy lands in the vicinity of what is now of Marsh Street Bertrando and Bertrando 2003). Maintenance in 1812 included new wheels for the grist mill and reroofing and new construction of houses for Mission Indians. Expansion continued between 1814 and 1819, with new dormitories for girls and unmarried women and for boys and single men, two additional rooms for the missionaries, 11 houses for Mission Indians, a new granary, lofts in the existing granaries, and a new wing measuring 263 feet long. This new wing completed the quadrangle (Englehardt 1933). In 1822 California became a Mexican Territory, and the mission lands gradually became private ranchos via new Mexican land grants. In 1834, the proclamation for secularization was issued, and the Mission was essentially disbanded. By that time, missionization, disease, and destruction of the native subsistence base had virtually eliminated the Chumash and their culture. By 1838, only 170 Native Americans, including Chumash, Salinans, and Yokuts remained at the Mission Greenwood 1978). Early Settlement (1850 to 1875) When California achieved statehood in 1850, immigrants were mainly interested in the riches to be found in the gold fields of the Sierra Nevada. Newcomers were able to find some semblance of the culture they left behind in the northern part of the State and the San Francisco Bay area, but southern California was seen as a wild, untamed country full of lawlessness. As a result, the population of the newly formed San Luis Obispo County grew slowly. The 1850 census lists 336 residents, but ethnicity is not recorded. However, over 230 were born in California, suggesting Native American and/or Mexican heritage. Fifty-five were born in Mexico, 20 were born in America, and 26 were European immigrants. The population makeup must have remained 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR unchanged through most of that decade, because in 1856, Henry Miller observed about 150 houses, inhabited principally by Native Americans and Mexicans (Miller 1856). A cholera epidemic in the 1850s decimated the Native American population. At least 70 Native Americans are said to have died from the disease, and many who were not affected fled the area and were not seen again. The effect of this disaster is noticeable in the 1860 census, which listed only 162 Indians within a town population of 1808. Disaster hit the county between 1862 and 1864 when great droughts killed hundreds of thousands of sheep and cattle, bankrupting Hispanic families who had acquired large ranchos. These families were forced to sell out to Euro-American entrepreneurs who were quickly arriving in the area (Krieger 1988). Those new arrivals spurred development within the sleepy town depicted in an 1865 lithograph (see Figure 4.9-2). With the influx of Euro-American landholders, growth came rapidly, and by 1868 housing demand far exceeded supply. Figure 4.9-2 Lithograph of San Luis Obispo, 1865 Growth of Industry and Commerce (1875 to 1900) In 1875, 2,500 residents were concentrated in a 4-square-mile area, with the outskirts sparsely settled. The city waterworks maintained a 2-mile open flume that carried water from springs above the town to a stone and cement reservoir. This water was then distributed through 5 miles of pipes that ran below all principal streets. The architecture was described as “rather primitive 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR but of late marked improvement.” There were more buildings of a more permanent nature, and many who had been renting were now building. Rental housing, with “reasonable rents at $10 to 25 per month according to size and location,” was in demand, and there was a limited supply Cooper 1875). Some of the first new buildings were constructed along Monterey Street, including the Quintana Building and the Sauer Bakery. The city waterworks serviced residences near the town center; residences elsewhere were supplied by individual wells. In 1875, Paulson reported four hotels, six livery stables, and one newspaper, the Weekly Tribune. He told how the City “commands trade up and down the coast and at least 100 miles to the interior” (Paulson 1875). Access to the outside world was through the Coast Line Stage. This company carried U.S. mail for Wells Fargo and Co. to points north and south of the city. Passenger coaches also ran from the city to the harbor, and a tri-weekly stage between the city and Cambria connected with the communities of Morro, Old Creek, and Cayucos. Additionally, a telegraph from San Francisco to Santa Barbara ran through San Luis Obispo, with an additional line from the city to the port Cooper 1875). The narrow-gauge Pacific Coast Railway from Port Harford to Los Alamos, which first ran in 1876, made San Luis Obispo the commercial center of the region and provided access for passenger steamer service. The City of San Luis Obispo was incorporated on March 20, 1876, and a codified system of ordinances was prepared and enacted. At the time of the 1880 census, there were 2,500 residents in the City. Just 3 years later, the number was said to have increased to 3,000 (Angel 1883). By the turn of the Century several events had continued to spur the growth of the City. In 1901 the City was served by the Pacific Coast Railway and mainline Southern Pacific (Krieger 1988). The completion of a rail line that allowed travel and shipment of goods to the south meant greater opportunities for selling and buying of commodities. The establishment of California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) in 1903 as a vocational school on 281 acres also was a great draw for the City. By this time San Luis Obispo had a population of 4,500. In 1909 San Luis Obispo's population had reached 6,500 residents with the central city containing four banks, six churches, and a system of schools including kindergarten and primary through high school and manual training. It also boasted three semi-weekly papers and a developing infrastructure of gas, water, sewer, and electricity. San Luis Obispo continued to grow steadily as a principally agricultural community into the early twentieth century. With the advent of the automobile and efficient highway systems, San Luis benefitted from its position in the "middle kingdom", equidistant between Los Angeles and the Bay Area. Commercial building in the downtown area gradually spread as the surrounding ranches were subdivided and developed. By the 1940s, the economy started to diversify and, with the end of World War II, the population continued to expand, mirroring the rest of southern California. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.9.1.5 Chevron Tank Farm (Project Site) The Project Site occupies the former Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Plat maps dating to 1867 and 1875 and the 1874 San Luis Obispo map do not show any structures on the property. It appears the area was never settled due to its marshy nature. In 1897 the land that would become the tank farm was still largely undeveloped as depicted in Harford & Chapman's Subdivision map (Denardo and Greenlee 2011). In 1900, the property and surrounding parcels remained unchanged. By the early twentieth century, the Project Site was part of the San Luis Obispo Suburban Tract, purchased by wealthy San Francisco entrepreneur Josephe Donohoe Grant. County deed records reveal that J. D. Grant acquired the Project Site and the surrounding land, a total of 1586-acres, from Bank of America on May 16, 1881 for the sum of $40,000 (Denardo and Greenlee 2011). In January of 1906, Grant hired A. F. Parsons to survey the large tract and to divide it into plots of varying sizes. As a result of the early 20th Century California petroleum boom, oil producers in the San Joaquin Valley required access to ports on the west coast to ship unrefined product both north to San Francisco and south to Los Angeles. Steamships docking at Port San Luis provided a valuable opportunity to transport and distribute the increased capacity being produced (Conway 2008:6). To transport the unrefined product from the San Joaquin Valley oil fields to the coast, Union Oil and other independent producers built the Producers Pipeline in 1909-1910. However, local capacity was needed to store the oil until it could be loaded onto ships. To accomplish this, Union Oil acquired the Project Site and the first storage tanks were erected in 1910. The pipeline went into operation in March 1910, carrying 30,000 barrels a day to its terminus at the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm (Rivers 2000:85), making the farm's role pivotal in the delivery of oil to sea ports. Increased storage was needed in 1914, so Union Oil expanded the tank farm’s capacity with four steel tanks of 55,000 barrels each. When completed, the tank farm contained 36 steel tanks of 55,000 barrels each, two mammoth reservoirs of a million and a half barrels each, and two concrete tanks of one million barrels each (Conway 2008:11). The Project Site's place in the history of the development of the oil industry in California is not confined to storage and distribution. On April 7, 1926, lightning struck several of the reservoirs at the tank farm sparking a major conflagration. Photographs of the unprecedented event attest to it being one of the more significant disasters in the history of oil in California (Conway 2008:11).The initial explosion and subsequent fire affected six reservoirs and blackened and burned nearby agricultural fields and farm houses. A father and son, Alonzo and William Seeber, died in the explosion. In addition to the two deaths, oil flowed from the tank farm to the Pacific Ocean and the intensity of the fire created its own local weather system. Despite suppression efforts by the facility staff, over the next four days the fire spread to the other reservoirs and to 12 of the existing 15 steel tanks from a combination of burning embers and boil-overs. Most damaging were the boil-overs, where the heated oil flowed out of the reservoirs and onto the ground surrounding the tanks. By April 11, 1926, all but a few thousand of the 6 million barrel inventory burnt to coke that spread across the Project Site. This release is considered responsible for most of the numerous surface occurrences of highly weathered and burned petroleum that cover the ground in topographically low areas of the Project Site. The tank farm was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s it was formally decommissioned. Chevron purchased Unocal, 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR including the Project Site in August 2005. The Project Site now is surrounded by urban development within the City of San Luis Obispo and the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA). 4.9.1.6 Prior Cultural Resource Inventories In 2008 a literature review and pedestrian cultural resources survey of the 332-acre Project Site was conducted (Conway 2008). The literature review found that the Project Site had not been surveyed previously for cultural resources, but nineteen cultural resources studies had been conducted within 1/4-mile surrounding the Project Site. The subsequent reconnaissance-level survey identified and recorded fifty-seven historic-period cultural features and 287 isolated artifacts (Conway 2008). Of these isolated finds, eight were prehistoric in nature, with the remainder dating from the ranching period (1870-1910) through the construction and operation of the tank farm (1910-1950). The majority of the fifty-seven historic-period cultural features identified during the study were associated with events occurring on the Project Site between 1910 and 1950, including construction and operation of the tank farm by a large labor force living and working on the land; the explosion of the tank farm in 1926 and its clean up; and subsequent operation and eventual decommissioning of the facility. Conway concluded that the 332-acre Project Site constituted a large historic-period archaeological site that was formally designated with the Primary Number P-40-041195. Though he did not formally evaluate the significance of P-40-041195, Conway (2008) speculated that the resource may be significant under CEQA and made a general recommendation for Phase II archaeological subsurface testing of each feature, stipulating that features within or adjacent to Project impact areas would receive the most intensive testing. Phase II archaeological testing was conducted to evaluate P-40-041195 using the significance criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (Pub. Res. Code §5024.1) Denardo and Greenlee 2011; Denardo et al. 2013). To guide the recommended testing and site evaluation, in 2009 they conducted further background research and reviewed the present environmental setting, the area’s ethnographic setting, its archaeological context, and Conway’s historical overview. They also prepared a site-specific research design for testing and evaluation. The focus of the proposed testing was 35 historic archaeological features, 7 groups of historic isolated finds, and 2 prehistoric isolated finds that have the potential to be impacted by Project- related ground disturbance; however, during the course of additional historic research for the research design, they identified an additional 15 features requiring inventory (GANDA 2010). Between September 7 and December 2, 2010, GANDA excavated and documented twenty-four historic features, one prehistoric feature, six groups of isolates, and two prehistoric isolated finds within P-40-041195. They employed a combination of backhoe trenching, shovel test pits (STP), test excavation units (TEUs), and photo documentation, and only tested features or groups of isolates within areas of direct impact. Following receipt of USACE permits, GANDA carried out additional testing at eleven more features and one group of isolated finds in August and September 2012. GANDA has issued a memorandum indicating that they completed this work Denardo and Greenlee 2012) and a full report on their findings was completed in 2013 (Denardo et al. 2013). Table 4.9-1 provides a synopsis of the recorded tank farm features and testing procedures. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.9-1 Chevron Tank Farm Features and Testing Procedures Recorded Features Location vis-à-vis Proposed Impacts Testing Procedures 1) Concentration of historic bricks and artifacts SE Quad outside impact areas None 2) Concentration of historic bricks SE Quad near Remediation Area None 3) Possible historic building site with bricks and artifacts SE Quad within Remediation Area Backhoe testing (2). Hand excavation of one TEU (1) to investigate intact deposits. 4) Historic drainage pipe and broken concrete SE Quad outside impact areas None 5) Historic concrete pad SE Quad within Remediation Area Backhoe testing (1) to investigate base. 6) Concentration of historic bricks and artifacts SE Quad outside impact areas None 7) Scattered group of historic artifacts SE Quad outside impact areas None 8) Large historic trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas None 9) Historic trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas None 10) Historic trash dump machine shop dump) SE Quad partially within Staging Area Backhoe Testing (2) 11) Historic trash dump SE Quad within Remediation Area Excavation of STPs (12) 12) Historic trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas None 13) Historic trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas None 14) Historic trash dump NE Quad outside impact areas None 15) Historic concrete foundation with bricks NW Quad outside impact areas None 16) Historic trash dump SW Quad outside impact areas None 17) Concentration of historic bricks SW Quad outside impact areas None 18) Historic concrete foundation with bricks SW Quad outside impact areas None 19) Historic boiler tank with heavy brick scatter SW Quad partially within Remediation Area Photographic documentation of boiler. Backhoe testing (2) of brick clusters. Hand excavation of one TEU (1) to investigate intact deposits. 20) Historic brick scatter NE Quad within Borrow Area and Development Area Excavation of STPs (10) 21) Large historic trash dump SE Quad within Borrow Area and Development Area Backhoe testing (2) to remove debris. Hand excavation of two TEUs (2) to investigate intact deposits. 22) Solidified oil with embedded historic artifacts NE Quad outside impact areas None 23) Historic concrete pad with redwood planks, barbed wire, and solidified oil SE Quad outside impact areas None 24) Historic concrete pad with bricks SW Quad within Remediation Area Backhoe testing (1) 25) Historic concrete pad with shaft NE Quad outside impact areas None 26) Historic concrete pad NE Quad outside impact areas None 27) Historic brick scatter with embossed bricks NE Quad within Borrow Area and Development Area Backhoe testing (2) to remove debris and investigate possible association with Features 20 & 21. Hand excavation of two TEUs (2) to investigate intact deposits. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.9-1 Chevron Tank Farm Features and Testing Procedures Recorded Features Location vis-à-vis Proposed Impacts Testing Procedures 28) Historic concrete pad NE Quad outside impact areas None 29) Historic concrete pad NE Quad outside impact areas None 30) Historic concrete pad NE Quad outside impact areas None 31) Large historic trash dump NE Quad outside impact areas None 32) Historic trash dump NW Quad west of Restoration Area None 33) Concentration of historic concrete, fire bricks, & structural bricks NE Quad within Restoration Area Excavation of STPs (6) 34) Three historic horseshoes NE Quad north of Restoration Area Controlled surface collection and excavation of one STP (1) 35) Concentration of historic redwood planks NE Quad north of Restoration and Remediation Areas None 36) Historic trash scatter NE Quad within Restoration Area Controlled surface collection and excavation of one STP (1) 37) Scatter of historic concrete and bricks NW Quad within Restoration Area Backhoe Testing (1) 38) Scatter of historic concrete and bricks NW Quad within Restoration Area Backhoe Testing (1) 39) Historic concrete and pipe fragments NW Quad within Feature 64 and Restoration Area None 40) Concentration of historic scrap iron NW Quad outside impact areas None 41) Attached historic redwood planks from large gate, platform or structure NW Quad outside impact areas None 42) Historic linear concentration of rocks along northern property boundary NW Quad outside impact areas None 43) Concentration of historic fence posts with machine cut nails NE Quad within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping 44) Historic concrete dam with an opening mechanism NE Quad outside impact areas None 45) Concentration of historic bricks, concrete fragments and rocks NW Quad within Restoration Area Backhoe Trench (1) 46) Concentration of historic bricks and concrete fragments NW Quad within Restoration Area? None 47) Concentration of historic bricks, glass, bones, and scrap iron NW Quad within Restoration, Development, and Remediation Areas Excavation of STPs (9) 48) Concentration of historic glass, redwood lumber, ceramics, and rocks Conway described location near Tank #80544, not labeled on any map None 49) Large historic trash dump Conway described location near wetland in north portion of property, not labeled on any map None 50) Cluster of historic Conway described location near None 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.9-1 Chevron Tank Farm Features and Testing Procedures Recorded Features Location vis-à-vis Proposed Impacts Testing Procedures concrete blocks Tank #80544, not labeled on any map 51) Large historic trash dump NW Quad within Restoration and Remediation Areas Backhoe testing (2) to determine depth and size. 52) Scatter of historic bricks NW Quad north of Restoration Area None 53) Pile of historic concrete rubble with shellfish and bottle glass NW Quad outside impact areas None 54) Historic trash dump NW Quad within Remediation Area Backhoe Testing (1) 55) Historic trash dump NW Quad outside impact areas None 56) Historic redwood fence section NW Quad within Remediation , Restoration, and Staging Areas Photographic documentation and mapping. 57) Historic trash scatter NW Quad within Remediation Area Backhoe Testing (1) 58) Historic Reservoir #2 NE Quad, contains smaller Remediation Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 59) Historic Reservoir #3 SE Quad within larger Remediation Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 60) Historic Reservoir #7 SW Quad within larger Remediation Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 61) Historic Reservoir #6 SW Quad partially within Staging Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 62) Historic Reservoir #5 SW Quad (Cultural Map 3) within larger Remediation Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 63) Historic Tank # 55534 NW Quad (Cultural Map 1) near Staging and Remediation Areas Photographic documentation and mapping. 64) Historic Tank # 55526 NW Quad within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 65) Historic Storage Tank NW Quad partially within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 66) Historic Storage Tank NW Quad partially within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 67) Historic Storage Tank NW Quad within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 68) Historic Storage Tank NW Quad partially within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 69) Historic Storage Tank NW Quad within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 70) Historic Tank #80546 NE Quad partially within Restoration Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 71) Historic Storage Tank NE Quad near Staging Area Photographic documentation and mapping. 72) Historic Reservoir #4 NE Quad within Development and Borrow Areas Photographic documentation and mapping. Backhoe testing (1) outside southwest corner. 73) Prehistoric Shell Scatter Southwest Quad Near Remediation Area Controlled surface collection and excavation of STPs 15) and two TEUs (2) Isolate Group #1 (#58-60, 62-67, 90-96, 100, 102- 119). Historic Artifacts Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Controlled Surface Collection Isolate Group #2 (#80-85) Historic Artifacts Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Backhoe testing (1) Isolate Group #3 (#88, 212- 220) Historic Artifacts Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Backhoe testing (1) Isolate Group #4 (#221, 225, 242, 243) Brick and Concrete Scatter Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Excavation of STPs (3) Isolate Group #5 (#253, Northeast Quad within Remediation Backhoe testing (1) 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.9-1 Chevron Tank Farm Features and Testing Procedures Recorded Features Location vis-à-vis Proposed Impacts Testing Procedures 255, 287) Historic Artifacts and Restoration Area Isolated Group # 6 (#132, 161, 189-192, 203-204, 208-209) Historic Artifacts Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Backhoe testing (2) and controlled surface collection to determine feature boundaries. Isolated Group #7 (#121- 131, 133-135, 137-139, 158-160, 162, 188, 193- 201, 207) Historic Artifacts Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Excavation of STPs (18) to determine association with Features 20 & 27 211 Chert core prehistoric tool Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Excavation of STPs (4 ) 256 Franciscan chert tool with edge use Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Excavation of STPs (4 ) On October 25, 2012, GANDA conducted a Phase I archaeological pedestrian survey of three parcels located just north of the Project Site. These parcels are in the vicinity of the flower mound and could be impacted by the remediation component of the proposed Project. GANDA archaeologists surveyed the Project’s Area of Potential Effects (APE), which comprises about seven acres adjacent to the northeast corner of the Project Site. The results of the survey indicate no archaeological sites or other cultural materials are present within the three properties surveyed. Because of the presence of prehistoric Native American remains within Project Site, the EIR consultant retained a qualified archaeological consultant (Applied Earth Works (Æ)) who initiated outreach to local Native American representatives. A letter was sent to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on September 30, 2009 requesting a search of their Sacred Lands File. The NAHC responded on October 12, 2009 that there were no listings in the Sacred Lands File relevant to the Project Site. However, the NAHC response included a list of individuals who might have knowledge of cultural resources within the Project area (see Table 4.9 -2). Letters were sent to these contacts on November 24, 2009. Æ placed follow-up phone calls to each of these tribal representatives on December 7, 2009. Results of these calls are summarized in Table 4.9-2. Table 4.9-2 Native American Contacts for the Chevron Tank Farm Project Contact Name Affiliation Response to Phone Call Adelina Alva-Padilla Santa Ynez Tribal Elders Council Spoke to Freddie Romero. No concerns with project. Referred to local Northern Chumash tribal representatives for consultation. Vincent Armenta Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians Spoke to Willie Wyatt, Tribal Administrator. He will consult with the Tribal Council. No further response received. Frank Arredondo Chumash Left message. No response received. Sam Cohen Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians Referred us to Willie Wyatt, current Tribal Administrator. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.9-2 Native American Contacts for the Chevron Tank Farm Project Contact Name Affiliation Response to Phone Call Fred Collins Northern Chumash Tribal Council He expressed concerns regarding the quality of past fieldwork and documentation of resources and strongly requests Northern Chumash Tribal Council involvement in the review process for this project. Beverly Salazar Folkes Chumash/Tataviam/Fernandeño Recommended Native American monitoring due to potential for buried remains. Janet Garcia Coastal Band, Chumash Nation Left message. No response received. Matthew Darian Goldman Northern Chumash Said he would review information and call back. No further response. Randy Guzman-Folkes Chumash/Tataviam/Fernandeño Left message. No response received. Diane Napoleone Chumash She expressed no concern with the project. Lei Lynn Odom Northern Chumash Expressed concerns regarding the potential for Native American sites in the area, unregulated activities in the area, origin and disturbance of soils, and safety. Recommended monitoring and HAZWOPER training for tribal monitors. Mona Olivas Tucker Northern Chumash Expressed concerns regarding the potential for Native American sites in the area, and recommended monitoring. Julie Lynn Tumamait Chumash Left message. No response received. Mark Steven Vigil San Luis Obispo County Chumash Council Left message. No response received. Xielolixii Chumash-Salinan Left message. No response received. 4.9.1.7 Prior Paleontological Resource Inventories In 2010 Dr. Roland Brady of Brady and Associates Geological Services completed a Paleontological Identification and Evaluation Report (PIR/PER) for the Project Site (Brady 2008). That report identified the geologic units underlying the Project Site and their potential to contain significant plant or vertebrate fossil resources, and assessed the Project's potential impacts on paleontological resources. Three geologic units occur at or adjacent to the Project Site. The Jurassic Franciscan assemblage crops out solely in the small quarry in the northeast part of the Project Site; this unit is unfossiliferous and assigned a Potential Fossil Yield Classification (PFYC) sensitivity of Class 1- Very low. Pleistocene alluvium forms low hills south of the Project 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Site and presumably underlies it at depth. This unit has produced significant fossils in the region, and has a PFYC of Class 4a-Highly Sensitive. Approximately 95% of the site is covered by Holocene river alluvium which, due to its young age, is not fossiliferous, so has a PFYC rating of Class 1- Very low. The Holocene alluvium extends to an estimated minimum depth of 8 feet. Brady concluded that the proposed Project is anticipated to have little impact on fossil resources since most excavations planned for soil remediation will be less than 5 feet deep, so will probably not encounter paleontologically sensitive Pleistocene beds in the subsurface. Deeper excavations, however, could penetrate through the Holocene sediments and damage potential fossil resources in the underlying Pleistocene unit. 4.9.2 Regulatory Setting Several state preservation laws guide actions that concern cultural and paleontological resources. These include the CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.), Public Health and Safety Code HSC), and Public Resources Code (PRC). At the local level, the City and County of San Luis Obispo require protection of archaeological, historical, and paleontological resources to the greatest extent feasible. All regulatory settings apply to the Project. 4.9.2.1 Cultural Resources In Section 21084.1 of the Public Resources Code, CEQA equates a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource with a significant effect on the environment. “Historical resources” include archaeological sites and historical buildings and structures/complexes listed in or eligible for listing in the CRHR and, by reference, the National Register of Historical Places, California Historical Landmarks, Points of Historical Interest, and local registers. Any resource listed in, or eligible for listing in, the CRHR is presumed to be historically or culturally significant. A substantial adverse change is demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration that would impair historical significance (Section 5020.1). Section 21084.1 further requires treatment of any substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as a significant effect on the environment. Where a project may adversely affect a unique archaeological resource, Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 requires the lead agency to treat that effect as a significant environmental impact and prepare an EIR. 4.9.2.2 Codes Governing Human Remains The disposition of human remains is governed by Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code (HSC) and Sections 5097.94 and 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code, (PRC) and falls within the jurisdiction of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). If human remains are discovered, the County Coroner must be notified within 48 hours and there should be no further disturbance to the site where the remains were found. If the remains are determined by the coroner to be Native American, the coroner is responsible for contacting the NAHC within 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 24 hours. The NAHC, pursuant to Section 5097.98, will immediately notify those persons it believes to be most likely descended from the deceased Native Americans so they can inspect the burial site and make recommendations for treatment or disposal. 4.9.2.3 City and County of San Luis Obispo Preservation Guidelines The City of San Luis Obispo Historic Preservation Program Guidelines provide guidance on the management of the historic built environment. They were adopted by City Council Resolution No. 6158 (1987 Series) and became effective February 3, 1987. The Guidelines were amended by City Council Resolution No. 6857 to incorporate standards for rehabilitation that have been established by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior; they were updated in 1990 and again in 2008. The Historic Preservation Program Guidelines define historical resources and historic districts, detail historic preservation benefits and services offered by the City, discuss the principles of historic preservation, and summarize the architectural review process. Additionally, these guidelines establish the roles and duties of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC), outline procedures for adding properties to the Master List of Historic Resources, and outline procedures for amending or establishing Historic Preservation Districts. The Master List of Historic Resources and the List of Contributing Properties within Historic Preservation Districts are appended to this document. The list was last updated in April 2008. The CHC developed the City’s Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines (part of the City’s Environmental Guidelines) to guide assessment of a project’s effects on archaeological sites and determine whether a project complies with CEQA’s cultural resource requirements. These guidelines call for a three-step approach to identification, evaluation, and treatment of archaeological resources: preparation of an Archaeological Resource Inventory ARI); Subsurface Archaeological Resource Evaluation (SARE); and Archaeological Resource Impact Mitigation (ARIM). These steps parallel the CEQA process. Proposed projects are also evaluated for consistency with the County’s following adopted goals and policies relating to cultural resources: General Plan, Land Use Element: Policy LU 4.12, Building Conservation and Compatibility General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element: Policy COS 3.2, Historic and Architectural Resources Policy COS 3.3.1, Historic Preservation Policy COS 3.3.2, Demolitions Policy COS 3.3.3, Historical Documentation Policy COS 3.3.4, Changes to Historical Buildings Policy COS 3.4, Archaeological Resources Policy COS 3.5.1, Archaeological Resource Protection Policy COS 3.5.4, Archaeological Sensitive Areas Policy COS 3.5.5, Archaeological Resources Present Policy COS 3.5.6, Qualified Archaeologist Present 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Policy COS 3.5.7, Native American Participant Policy COS 3.5.8, Protection of Native American Cultural Sites 4.9.2.4 Paleontological Resources Paleontological resources cannot be replaced once they are destroyed. Therefore, paleontological resources are considered nonrenewable scientific resources and are protected under CEQA. Section 15065(a)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a lead agency to find that a project may have a significant environmental impact if it will “eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory." Further, in Section V(c) of Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the “Environmental Checklist Form,” the question is posed: “Will the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?” To determine the uniqueness of a given paleontological resource, it must first be identified or recovered (i.e., salvaged). Therefore, mitigation of adverse impacts to paleontological resources is mandated by CEQA. Section 5097.5 of the Public Resources Code affirms that no person shall willingly or knowingly excavate, remove, or otherwise destroy a vertebrate paleontological site or paleontological feature without the express permission of the overseeing public land agency. It further states that any development that would adversely impact paleontological resources shall require reasonable mitigation. Paleontological resources also are addressed under the Conservation and Open Space Element of the County’s General Plan. Goal CR 4 states, “The County’s known and potential Native American, archaeological, and paleontological resources will be preserved and protected.” Policy CR 4.5 states, “Protect paleontological resources from the effects of development by avoiding disturbance where feasible.” In order to fulfill this goal, the County has set forth the following implementation strategies: Implementation Strategy CR 4.5.1 Paleontological Studies Require a paleontological resource assessment and mitigation plan to 1) identify the extent and potential significance of the resources that may exist within the proposed development and 2) provide mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts when existing information indicates that a site proposed for development may contain biological, paleontological, or other scientific resources. Implementation Strategy CR 4.5.2 Paleontological Monitoring Require a paleontologist and/or registered geologist to monitor site-grading activities when paleontological resources are known or likely to occur. The monitor will have the authority to halt grading to determine the appropriate protection or mitigation measures. Measures may include collection of paleontological resources, curation of any resources collected with an appropriate repository, and documentation with the County [San Luis Obispo County 2010: 4.15]. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.9.3 Significance Criteria 4.9.3.1 Thresholds for Determining Significance For projects financed by or requiring the discretionary approval of public agencies in California, CEQA requires that the effects of the project on paleontological, historical, and archaeological resources must be considered (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21083.2). Historical resources are defined as buildings, sites, structures, or objects, each of which may have historical, architectural, archaeological, cultural, or scientific importance (PRC Section 50201). The CEQA Guidelines (Section 15064.5) define three cases in which a property may qualify as a historical resource for the purpose of CEQA review: The resource is listed in or determined eligible for listing in the CRHR. Section 5024.1 defines eligibility requirements and state that a resource may be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR if it: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Resources that are listed in or eligible for listing in the NRHP are considered eligible for listing in the CRHR, and thus are significant historical resources for the purpose of CEQA PRC Section 5024.1(d)(1)). The resource is included in a local register of historic resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC, or is identified as significant in a historical resources survey that meets the requirements of section 5024.1(g) of the PRC (unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the resource is not historically or culturally significant). The lead agency determines that the resource may be a historical resource as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(j), 5024.1, or significant as supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. In its standard guidelines for assessing and mitigating adverse impacts to paleontological resources, the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP 2010) noted that a fossil specimen is considered to be "significant" (having scientific importance) if it is: 1) identifiable, 2) complete, 3) well preserved, 4) age-diagnostic, 5) useful in paleoenvironmental reconstruction, 6) a type or topotypic specimen, 7) a member of a rare species, 8) a species that is part of a diverse assemblage, or 9) a skeletal element different from, or a specimen more complete than, those now available for that species. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The value or importance of different fossil groups varies depending on the age and depositional environment of the stratigraphic unit that contains the fossils, their abundance in the record, and their degree of preservation. SVP (2010) considers all vertebrate fossil occurrences as significant because they are so uncommon and only rarely will a locality yield a number of specimens of the same species. So, each new fossil specimen found provides important information about the characteristics or distribution of the species it represents. Fossil plants, unlike animals, are not mobile and are highly climatically diagnostic, so are particularly useful for paleoenvironmental reconstructions, and therefore, may be significant as well. 4.9.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact CR.1 Impacts to paleontological resources due to ground disturbance as a result of remediation activities. Remediation Class II Absent specific agency guidelines, most professional paleontologists in California adhere to guidelines set forth by SVP in “Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources” (SVP 2010). These guidelines establish detailed protocols for the assessment of the paleontological resource potential (i.e., “sensitivity”) of a project area and outline measures to follow in order to mitigate adverse impacts to known or unknown fossil resources during project development. Per SVP recommendations, the EIR Consultant retained a qualified professional paleontologist to conduct an assessment of the Project Site. Using baseline information gathered during the paleontological resource assessment, the paleontological resource potential of the geologic unit(s) (or members thereof) underlying the Project Site were assigned to one of four categories defined by SVP (2010). These categories include high, undetermined, low and no potential. The criteria for each sensitivity classification, and the corresponding mitigation recommendations, are summarized in Table 4.9-3 below. If a project area is determined to have high or undetermined potential for paleontological resources following the initial assessment, then SVP recommends that a paleontological resources mitigation plan be developed and implemented during the construction phase of a project. The mitigation plan describes, in detail, when and where paleontological monitoring will take place and establishes communication protocols to be followed in the event that an unanticipated fossil discovery is made during project development. If significant fossil resources are known to occur within the boundaries of the project and have not been collected, then the plan will outline the procedures to be followed prior to the commencement of construction (i.e., pre-construction salvage efforts or avoidance measures including fencing off a locality). Should microfossils be known to occur in the geologic unit(s) underlying the Project area or suspected to occur, then the plan will describe the methodology for matrix sampling and screening. The paleontological mitigation plan should be prepared by a qualified professional paleontologist and developed using the results of the initial paleontological assessment and survey. Elements of the plan can be adjusted throughout the course of a project as new information is gathered and 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR conditions change, so long as the lead agency is consulted and all parties are in agreement. For example, if after 50 percent of earth-disturbing activities have occurred in a particular unit or area, and no fossils whatsoever have been discovered, then the project paleontologist can reduce or eliminate monitoring efforts in that unit or area. Table 4.9-3 Paleontological Sensitivity Categories Resource Potential Criteria Mitigation Recommendations No Potential Rock units that are formed under or exposed to immense heat and pressure, such as high-grade metamorphic rocks and plutonic igneous rocks. No mitigation required. Low Potential Rocks units that have yielded few fossils in the past, based upon review of available literature and museum collections records. Geologic units of low potential also include those that yield fossils only on rare occasion and under unusual circumstances. Mitigation is not typically required. Undetermined Potential In some cases, available literature on a particular geologic unit will be scarce and a determination of whether or not it is fossiliferous or potentially fossiliferous will be difficult to make. Under these circumstances, further study is needed to determine the unit’s paleontological resource potential (i.e., field survey). A field survey is required to further assess the unit’s paleontological potential. High Potential Geologic units with high potential for paleontological resources are those that have proven to yield vertebrate or significant invertebrate, plant or trace fossils in the past or are likely to contain new vertebrate materials, traces, or trackways. Rock units with high potential also may include those that contain datable organic remains older than late Holocene (e.g., animal nests or middens). Typically, a field survey as well as on-site construction monitoring will be required. Any significant specimens discovered will need to be prepared, identified, and curated into a museum. A final report documenting the significance of the finds will also be required. Adapted from SVP (2010). Rocks of the Franciscan mélange crop out in a small area at the northeastern corner of the Project Site. Because of its meta-igneous origin, the Franciscan serpentine is not likely to contain significant fossil remains. Most of the Project Site is covered by Holocene alluvium that is too young to contain fossils. For these reasons the EIR consultant judged the surface sediments at the Project Site to have very low paleontological sensitivity (Brady 2009). The only vertebrate fossils to potentially occur at the site would be those of Pleistocene age. Although no fossils have been reported from within or immediately adjacent to the Project Site, important Pleistocene marine and non-marine vertebrates have been recovered from less than 10 miles away. Older alluvium of Pleistocene age and similar in age and composition to other fossiliferous units in the region underlies the Holocene alluvium at the Project Site. This stratum 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR has a high potential to contain significant fossils, and these beds therefore have high paleontological sensitivity. The depth to the Older Alluvium is unknown, and can only be determined from boreholes or trenching, but, based on adjacent topography and similar deposits, it is probably occurs between 6 and 8 feet below the current ground surface. Where excavations are less than 5 feet deep, there would be no impact potential to impact fossil resources because uppermost Holocene deposits, which cover 95% of the site, do not contain fossils. Remediation excavations would be limited to a depth of 5 feet below ground surface. Therefore, in areas of shallow excavations the impact on fossil resources would be less than significant. Deeper excavations (greater than 5 feet) that could penetrate through the Holocene alluvium and cut into the underlying Pleistocene could encounter fossil resources. In areas where grading may extend into the Pleistocene deposits, the Project's impact could be potentially significant. Mitigation Measures CR-1a Prior to issuance of grading permits for the Project, the Applicant shall prepare a Paleontological Monitoring and Mitigation Plan to preserve and protect any fossil resources that may be uncovered during deep excavations at the Project Site. The Plan shall be prepared by a Principal Paleontologist who meets SVP professional qualification standards and shall be consistent with SVP Guidelines. The Plan shall include, at a minimum: 1. Provisions for paleontological monitoring under the supervision of the Principal Paleontologist during all excavation greater than 5 feet deep; 2. Descriptions of how salvage and/or preservation will be conducted if fossils are encountered; 3. Standards for recording fossil localities in the field, analyzing and preparing recovered remains in the laboratory, and reporting results; 4. Health and safety procedures to be implemented by monitors during work at the Project Site; and 5. A curation agreement with qualified repositories for scientific research and public education. Monitoring shall entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected, if appropriate. Monitoring efforts may be reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the Principal Paleontologist if, after 50 percent of the excavations are completed, no fossil resources are encountered. CR-1b If paleontological resources are discovered during any ground disturbing activities, the Applicant or their agents shall immediately cease all work activities within 50 feet of the discovery until the Provisions of the Paleontological Monitoring and Mitigation 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Plan (MM CR-1a) are implemented. Any required significance evaluation or fossil recovery shall be fully funded by the Applicant and completed under the supervision of a Principal Paleontologist who meets SVP professional qualification standards. Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until authorization is received from the County or City Department of Planning and Building. CR-1c The Applicant shall design and implement a Worker Education Program that shall be provided to all Project personnel who may encounter and/or alter paleontological resources, including construction supervisors and field personnel. No construction worker shall be involved in field operations without having participated in the Worker Education Program. The training shall be prepared by the Principal Paleontologist and shall provide a description of the fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, outline steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made, and provide contact information for the Project Paleontologist and on-site monitor(s). The training may be conducted concurrent with other environmental or safety awareness and education programs for the Project, provided that the program elements pertaining to paleontological resources is provided by a qualified instructor meeting applicable professional qualifications standards. Residual Impacts Implementation of mitigation measures CR-1A through 1C would reduce impacts to paleontological resources to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact CR.2 Impacts to historical resources at the Project Site due to ground disturbance as a result of remediation activities. Remediation Class II For the purposes of this EIR, the EIR consultant completed an independent desktop analysis of cultural resource impacts that involved several steps. First, the EIR consultant reviewed the prior historical and archaeological research (Conway 2008; GANDA 2010; Denardo and Greenlee 2011, 2012, Denardo et al. 2013) prepared by the Applicant’s consultant to identify the relevant theme(s) in regional history that apply to the Project area and thus provide the general context for evaluation of the resources. In this approach, the Project Site is viewed as a single archaeological site comprised of multiple features and feature systems linked together by their function, age, and associations. As the Applicant’s consultant observed, the site features may represent several historical themes of importance in California history (GANDA 2010). The Applicant’s consultant provided baseline data that were adequate to evaluate the historical and archaeological significance of Project Site, determine whether individual features within the site embody its significant qualities, and complete the impact assessment. The EIR consultant applied the CRHR significance criteria to establish whether or not the Project Site is associated with historically important events or individuals, is a good representation of the relevant historical themes, has unique or unusual technological or aesthetic qualities, and retains enough integrity to convey its significant associations and/or qualities. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Based upon the prior research, two historical themes emerge in the development of the Project Site: the development and growth of the petroleum industry in California from the early twentieth century to the present, and ranching and agriculture during the late nineteenth to early twentieth centuries. Most features at the Project Site are associated with the first of these themes; however, archaeological testing also identified three features associated with the initial ranching and agricultural uses of the Project Site. Additionally, the Project Site contains prehistoric archaeological remains associated with the theme of Native American occupation and land use see Table 4.9-1). The EIR Consultant has concluded that the entire Project Site (site P-40-041195) is a significant historical resource eligible for the CRHR under Criterion 1 because of its critically important role in the early development of the oil industry in California, one of the most important events in the State’s economic history. The reasons for this determination include that fact that the Project Site was a pivotal node in the system that delivered crude oil from the San Joaquin Valley oil fields to refineries near Los Angeles and San Francisco, permitting the efficient storage, transportation, and processing of this vital resource. Additionally, the Project Site’s historic significance is tied to the 1926 fire that nearly destroyed the existing infrastructure on the Project Site and was the greatest environmental catastrophe of its time and one of the most significant disasters in the history of oil development in California. The period of significance for the association with these events in the development of the petroleum industry is 1910-1950. The physical features of the Project Site that define its character and evoke its significant historical associations are those that are linked clearly with the Project Site’s role in the storage and distribution of crude oil. These defining characteristics are found principally in the remnants of the tanks and reservoirs that portray the site’s original function and reflect the property’s initial industrial development, growth, operation, and near destruction by catastrophic fire. The remnant tanks and reservoirs that express the Project Site’s significant qualities have been designated Features 58-72 at the Project Site (see table 4.9-1). The Project Site is also eligible for the CRHR because of its association with the theme of early ranching and agriculture; the period of significance for this theme is 1870-1910. Because archaeological deposits dating to this period have the potential to yield important information regarding this theme, the site is significant under Criteria 1 and 4 within this context. As a result of archaeological testing and evaluation, it was found that Features 21 and 27 embody the significant qualities of the site within this context (refer to Table 4.9-1) (Denardo and Greenlee 2011). Based on data supplied by the Applicant’s consultant and their own independent evaluation, the EIR consultant has concluded that 17 archaeological features within the Project Site are associated with the important historical themes described above and retain physical characteristics that express the site’s historical significance. Another 28 archaeological features, isolates, and isolate groups within the Project Site lack the quantity or variety of artifacts required to express the significant qualities of the site, or cannot be linked to the relevant historical themes. Included among these are prehistoric Native American remains, which did not contain temporally or technologically diagnostic artifacts or other materials that can be used to place the features in time or provide other important new information about local or regional prehistory (Table 4.9-4). 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Thirty-seven features listed in Table 4.9-4 (below) are located outside of the direct impact area of the Project (i.e., remediation, restoration, or either the County or City Development Plans) and were not evaluated during the current investigations. For future site management purposes, these features also should be considered significant and treated accordingly. Finally, three features recorded by Conway (2008) (Features 48, 49, and 50, Table 4.9-1) were not depicted on the archaeological inventory maps and could not be identified or examined during the testing and evaluation phase. Table 4.9-4 lists the features, their locations vis-à-vis proposed impacts, and the CRHR significance determinations. Table 4.9-4 Project Site Features and CRHR Significance Determinations Recorded Features Location vis-à-vis Planned Impacts CRHR Significance Determination 1) Concentration of bricks and artifacts SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 2) Concentration of bricks SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 3) Possible building site with bricks and artifacts SE Quad within Remediation Area Not Significant 4) Drainage pipe and broken concrete SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 5) Concrete pad SE Quad within Remediation Area Not Significant 6) Concentration of bricks and artifacts SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 7) Scattered group of historic artifacts SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 8) Large trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 9) Trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 10) Trash dump (machine shop dump) SE Quad partially within Staging Area Not Significant 11) Trash dump SE Quad within Remediation Area Not Significant 12) Trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 13) Trash dump SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 14) Trash dump NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 15) Concrete foundation with bricks NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 16) Trash dump SW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 17) Concentration of bricks SW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 18) Concrete foundation with bricks SW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 19) Boiler tank with heavy brick scatter SW Quad partially within Remediation Area Not Significant 20) Brick scatter NE Quad within Borrow Area and Development Area Not Significant 21) Large trash dump SE Quad within Borrow Area and Development Area Significant 22) Solidified oil with embedded artifacts NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 23) Concrete pad with redwood planks, barbed wire, and solidified oil SE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 24) Concrete pad with bricks SW Quad within Remediation Area Not Significant 25) Concrete pad with well shaft NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 26) Concrete pad NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 27) Brick scatter with embossed bricks NE Quad within Borrow Area and Development Area Significant 28) Concrete pad NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 29) Concentration of bricks NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 30) Concrete pad NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 31) Large trash dump NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 32) Trash dump NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 33) Concentration of concrete, fire bricks, & structural bricks NE Quad within Restoration Area Not Significant 34) Three horseshoes NE outside impact areas* Unevaluated 35) Concentration of redwood planks NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 36) Trash scatter NE Quad within Restoration Area Not Significant 37) Scatter of concrete and bricks NW Quad within Restoration Area Not Significant 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.9-4 Project Site Features and CRHR Significance Determinations Recorded Features Location vis-à-vis Planned Impacts CRHR Significance Determination 38) Scatter of concrete and bricks NW Quad within Restoration Area Not Significant 39) Concrete and pipe fragments NW Quad within boundaries Feature 64 butoutside Restoration Area* Unevaluated 40) Concentration of scrap iron NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 41) Attached redwood planks from large gate, platform or structure NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 42) Linear concentration of rocks along northern property boundary NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 43) Concentration of old fence posts with machine cut nails NE Quad within Restoration Area Not Significant 44) Concrete dam with an opening mechanism NE Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 45) Concentration of bricks, concrete fragments and rocks NW Quad within Restoration Area Not Significant 46) Concentration of bricks and concrete fragments NW Quad outside Restoration Area* Unevaluated 47) Concentration of bricks, glass, bones, and scrap iron NW Quad within Restoration, Development, and Remediation Areas Not Significant 48) Concentration of glass, redwood lumber, ceramics, and rocks Conway described location near Tank 80544, not labeled on any map* Unevaluated 49) Large trash dump Conway described location near wetland in north portion of property, not labeled on any map* Unevaluated 50) Cluster of concrete blocks Conway described location near Tank 80544, not labeled on any map* Unevaluated 51) Large trash dump NW Quad within Restoration and Remediation Areas Not Significant 52) Scatter of bricks NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 53) Pile of concrete rubble with shellfish and bottle glass NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 54) Trash dump NW Quad within Remediation Area Not Significant 55) Trash dump NW Quad outside impact areas* Unevaluated 56) Redwood fence section NW Quad within Remediation , Restoration, and Staging Areas Not Significant 57) Trash scatter NW Quad within Remediation Area Not Significant 58) Reservoir #2 NE Quad, contains smaller Remediation Area Significant 59) Reservoir #3 SE Quad within larger Remediation Area Significant 60) Reservoir #7 SW Quad within larger Remediation Area Significant 61) Reservoir #6 SW Quad partially within Staging Area Significant 62) Reservoir #5 SW Quad (Cultural Map 3) within larger Remediation Area Significant 63) Tank # 55534 NW Quad (Cultural Map 1) near Staging and Remediation Areas Significant 64) Tank # 55526 NW Quad within Restoration Area Significant 65) Storage Tank NW Quad partially within Restoration Area Significant 66) Storage Tank NW Quad partially within Restoration Area Significant 67) Storage Tank NW Quad within Restoration Area Significant 68) Storage Tank NW Quad partially within Restoration Area Significant 69) Storage Tank NW Quad within Restoration Area Significant 70) Tank #80546 NE Quad partially within Restoration Area Significant 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.9-4 Project Site Features and CRHR Significance Determinations Recorded Features Location vis-à-vis Planned Impacts CRHR Significance Determination 71) Storage Tank NE Quad near Staging Area Significant 72) Reservoir #4 NE Quad within Development and Borrow Areas Significant 73) Prehistoric Shell Scatter Southwest Quad Near Remediation Area Not Significant Isolate Group #1 (#58-60, 62-67, 90-96, 100, 102-119). Historic Artifacts Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant Isolate Group #2 (#80-85) Historic Artifacts Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant Isolate Group #3 (#88, 212- 220) Historic Artifacts Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant Isolate Group #4 (#221, 225, 242, 243) Brick and Concrete Scatter Northwest Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant Isolate Group #5 (#253, 255, 287) Historic Artifacts Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant Isolated Group # 6 (#121-131, 133-135, 137- 139, 158-160, 162, 188, 193-201, 207) Historic Artifacts Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant Isolated Group #7 (#132, 161, 189-192, 203- 204, 208-209) Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant 211 Chert core prehistoric tool Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant 256 Franciscan chert tool with edge use Northeast Quad within Remediation and Restoration Area Not Significant Feature outside area of direct impact (ADI) The entire Project Site is a significant historical resource eligible for the CRHR because of its association with several historical themes important in state and local history. The significant qualities of the site are embodied in numerous historical features distributed across the 332-acre Project Site. These features would be impacted by the remediation and restoration activities. Though complete avoidance is the preferred treatment alternative, avoidance is not feasible within the remediation and restoration footprint. As such impacts are potentially significant. Mitigation Measures CR-2a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, the Applicant shall fund and implement a Phase III archaeological data recovery program at Features 21 and 27. The data recovery shall be directed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) with expertise in historical archaeology, and shall be carried out in accordance with a Data Recovery Plan prepared in advance by the RPA and approved by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. All artifacts and other remains shall be analyzed according to current professional standards. A final technical report shall be prepared that describes field and laboratory methods, results of technical analysis of recovered materials, and site interpretations. Artifacts, records, and other associated materials shall be deposited with an appropriate curation facility following completion of the work; the Applicant shall be responsible for all curation costs. A Chumash tribal representative shall monitor all excavation. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CR-2b Presently 37 features are located outside the remediation areas of impact. However, if project design plans change to include these areas then prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall fund and implement a Phase II/III archaeological data recovery program at Features 1, 2, 4, 6, 7-9, 12-18, 22-23, 25-26, 28-32, 34-35, 39-42, 44, 46, 48-50, 52, 53, and 55 . Without proper subsurface testing and evaluation, the significance of each of these features remains unknown. Therefore, for management purposes they are assumed to embody the site’s significant qualities. The data recovery program at these features shall use a phased approach which first defines their significant qualities and then recovers a representative sample. The work shall follow the “consolidated approach” outlined in the City of San Luis Obispo Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines (October 2009 edition); the approach shall be described in detail in a Data Recovery Plan prepared in advance by the RPA and approved by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. The work shall be directed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) with expertise in historical archaeology. If the Applicant’s Consultant completes a separate report on the testing and evaluation of these features, and it is reviewed by the EIR Consultant, then additional testing and/or mitigation may not be required for some of these features. All artifacts and other remains recovered from these features shall be analyzed according to current professional standards. A final technical report shall describe field and laboratory methods, results of technical analysis of recovered materials, and site interpretations. Artifacts, records, and other associated materials shall be deposited with an appropriate curation facility following completion of the work; the Applicant shall be responsible for all curation costs. A Chumash tribal representative shall monitor all excavation. CR-2c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, Features 58-72 shall be documented to Level 1 standards of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). The County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building shall ensure that HAER documentation is carried out by a qualified architectural historian who meets the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History. HAER documentation shall include a Historic Structure Report (HSR) prepared to National Park Service HABS/HAER standards and guidelines. All work shall be fully funded by the Applicant and approved by the County. The HSR shall include a set of measured drawings and large format black-and-white 8-by-10 inch archival quality prints and negatives produced by a professional photographer. The photographs should include a minimum of twelve views, including interior and exterior views of the character-defining elements of the remnant tanks and reservoirs, and existing drawings or historic views. All reports along with two sets of prints shall be submitted to the California State Library in Sacramento and the History Center of San Luis Obispo County. CR-2d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall insure that construction fencing is placed around the construction zone prior to the start of construction to protect the remaining unevaluated resources outside the Area of Direct Impact (ADI). Fencing shall ensure a minimum buffer of 20 feet around any 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR unevaluated cultural features (unless otherwise determined by a Registered Professional Archaeologist). Areas outside the protective fencing shall be designated as Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA). The fence installation shall be monitored by the RPA to insure no impact to any cultural resources, and shall be periodically inspected by an environmental monitor to ensure that it remains in place throughout the duration of construction. CR-2e Prior to completion of the grading portion of the remediation component of the Project, the Applicant shall prepare a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) which is integrated with the long-range Open Space Management Plan. The CRMP shall be approved by the County in consultation with the City. The CRMP shall include, but not limited to, specification of policies and procedures to manage and protect cultural resources on the entire Project Site from impacts by future projects or use of the Project Site. The CRMP preparation and implementation shall be fully funded by the Applicant, developed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), and shall be made applicable to the Project Site in perpetuity, through the recordation of restrictive covenants in a form approved by the County, in consultation with the City.. CR-2f Prior to completion of the grading portion of the remediation component of the Project and subsequent to completion of Phase III data recovery, the Applicant shall fund the preparation of public interpretive materials including, but not limited to, a plaque and display kiosks approved by the County in consultation with the City to be placed in an easily accessible location on the southern and northern parcels of the Project Site, and on a website or static exhibit suitable for display at The History Center, San Luis Obispo Public Library, and/or other appropriate public location within the City of San Luis Obispo. Residual Impacts Implementing mitigation measures CR-2a through CR-2f would reduce the impact of the Project on the significant qualities of historical resource P-40-041195 (i.e., the Project Site) to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact CR.3 Inadvertent discovery of archaeological remains during remediation activities. Remediation Class II The presence of isolated prehistoric and historic archaeological artifacts within the 332-acre Project Site may indicate that more substantial buried deposits are present, as archaeological sites or features may be buried with no surface manifestation. Therefore, ground disturbing activities associated with the Project have the potential to disturb or destroy previously unidentified buried archaeological materials, which would be a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures CR-3a The Applicant will design and implement a Worker Education Program that will be provided to all Project personnel who may encounter and/or alter historical resources or unique archaeological properties, including construction supervisors and field personnel. No construction worker will be involved in field operations without having participated in the Worker Education Program. The Worker Education Program shall include, at a minimum: 1. A review of archaeology, history, prehistory and Native American cultures associated with historical resources in the Project vicinity. 2. A review of applicable state and local ordinances, laws and regulations pertaining to historic preservation. 3. A discussion of site procedures to be followed in the event that unanticipated cultural resources are discovered during implementation of the Project. 4. A statement by the construction company or applicable employer agreeing to abide by the Worker Education Program, City and County policies and other applicable laws and regulations. The Worker Education Program may be conducted in concert with other environmental or safety awareness and education programs for the Project, provided that the program elements pertaining to cultural resources are provided by a qualified instructor meeting applicable professional qualifications standards. CR-3b If prehistoric or historic-period archaeological resources are discovered during any ground disturbing activities, the Applicant or their agents shall immediately cease all work activities within 50 feet of the discovery and immediately notify the City or the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. A Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) shall evaluate the significance of the discovery prior to resuming any activities that could impact the resource. If the archaeologist determines that the find embodies the significant qualities of the Project Site or offers previously unidentified data potential, the area of concern as determined by the RPA shall be avoided or a data recovery plan shall be developed. Any required testing or data recovery and/or curation shall be fully funded by the Applicant and completed by a RPA prior to construction being resumed in the affected area. Work shall not resume until authorization is received from the County and City Department of Planning and Building. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts Implementation of mitigation measures CR-3a and 3b will reduce impacts to previously unidentified archaeological resources to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact CR.4 Inadvertent discovery of human remains during remediation activities. Remediation Class II If human remains are encountered during grading, excavation, demolition or other ground disturbing activities, the disturbance of these remains would be a significant impact. According to CEQA, “Archaeological sites known to contain human remains shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section (7050.5) Health and Safety Code.” The Public Resources Code (PRC) also ensures the protection of human remains (Sections 5097.94, 5097.98, and 5097.99). Therefore, the following mitigation measure is required. Mitigation Measures CR-4 If potential human remains are discovered, the Applicant or their agents shall comply with Section 15064.5 (e) (1) of the CEQA Guidelines and the Public Resources Code Section 7050.5. All work activities shall immediately cease in the area (within approximately 50 feet) of the discovery. A Registered Professional Archaeologist RPA) shall inspect the remains and confirm that they are human, and if so shall immediately notify the County and City Departments of Planning and Building and contact the County Coroner in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). As provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, the NAHC shall identify the person or persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendent, in consultation with the County, City, and other Tribal representatives, makes recommendations for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Based on discussions with tribal representatives, fully funded by the Applicant, and subject to concurrence of the Most Likely Desendent (MLD), the following treatments of human remains shall be considered (in order of preference): 1. Remains shall be left in place if at all possible through Project redesign; 2. Remains shall be disinterred and reburied on the Project Site in a location not subject to further disturbance; 3. Remains shall be disinterred and reburied in a location provided by the Applicant and/or the County. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Any disinterment of human remains shall be carried out with due care and respect, according to archaeological procedures. In situ Native American remains may be documented with drawings, measurements, and other non-destructive methods, but shall not be photographed or subject to destructive analysis without prior approval of the MLD. Residual Impacts Implementing CR-4 would reduce the impact of potentially encountering and disturbing human remains during grading and excavation to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.9.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The City Development Plan component of the proposed Project would result in impacts that are similar to construction impacts identified in Section 4.9.4 under the remediation portion of the Project. Those impacts include impacts to the sensitive historical resource, potential impacts to archaeological resources and potential impacts to human remains. Equally, the same mitigation measures and residual impacts would apply to the City Development Plan component of the Project. The City Development Plan also includes more rapid (phase 1) development in the eastern end of the Project Site, north of Tank Farm Road, and the northwest operations area. 4.9.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The County Development Plan impacts would result in impacts that are similar to the construction impacts identified in Section 4.9.4 under the remediation portion of the Project. Those impacts include impacts to the sensitive historical resource, potential impacts to archaeological resources and potential impacts to human remains. Equally, the same mitigation measures and residual impacts would apply to the County Development Plan component of the Project. 4.9.7 Cumulative Analysis The State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15130) require that the cumulative impacts of a proposed project be addressed in an EIR when the cumulative impacts could be significant. Cumulative impacts are the incremental effects of the proposed project that, added to the impacts of other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, are found to be cumulatively considerable. For cultural resources, the geographic extent of cumulative impacts encompasses a relatively broad area because the significance or importance of any individual resource can only be judged in terms of its regional context and relationship to other resources. Thus, the significance of impacts on any given resource or group of resources must be examined in light of the integrity of the regional resource base. Because the number of cultural resources is finite, limited, and non- renewable, any assessment of cumulative impacts must take into consideration the impacts of the 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR proposed project on resources within the project area; the extent to which those impacts degrade the integrity of the regional resource base; and impacts other projects may have on the regional resource base. If these effects, taken together, result in a collective degradation of the resources base, then those impacts are considered cumulatively considerable. For the proposed Project, the regional resource base is defined geographically, historically, and with reference to the specific relevant government jurisdictions. The geographic scope of the cumulative impact analysis takes in a region encompassing the City of San Luis Obispo and San Luis Obispo County. In this EIR, the cumulative impact analysis includes the Project and a list of past and future projects identified in Table 3-1 in Section 3.0. The application of specific State regulations and County and City policies, actions, and development standards to other projects in the area would result in avoidance or minimization of impacts from those other actions. These regulations, policies, and standards require avoidance of significant historical resources whenever feasible; if avoidance is not feasible, then appropriate mitigation measures would be applied. Through these actions, the cumulative diminishment of the number of individual historical resources will be mitigated to less than significant levels. As such, cumulative impacts are considered less than significant with mitigation. 4.9.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party CR-1a Prior to issuance of grading permits for the Project, the Applicant shall prepare a Paleontological Monitoring and Mitigation Plan to preserve and protect any fossil resources that may be uncovered during deep excavations at the Project Site. The Plan shall be prepared by a Principal Paleontologist who meets SVP professional qualification standards and shall be consistent with SVP Guidelines. The Plan shall include, at a minimum: 1. Provisions for paleontological monitoring under the supervision of the Principal Paleontologist during all excavation greater than 5 feet deep; 2. Descriptions of how salvage and/or preservation will be conducted if fossils are encountered; 3. Standards for recording fossil localities in the field, analyzing and preparing recovered remains in the laboratory, and reporting results; 4. Health and safety procedures to be implemented by monitors during work at the Project Site; and 5. A curation agreement with qualified Review program, execution and final monitoring plan Prior to land use clearance County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Building 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-37 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party repositories for scientific research and public education. Monitoring shall entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected, if appropriate. Monitoring efforts may be reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the Principal Paleontologist if, after 50 percent of the excavations are completed, no fossil resources are encountered. CR-1b If paleontological resources are discovered during any ground disturbing activities, the Applicant or their agents shall immediately cease all work activities within 50 feet of the discovery until the Provisions of the Paleontological Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (MM CR-1a) are implemented. Any required significance evaluation or fossil recovery shall be fully funded by the Applicant and completed under the supervision of a Principal Paleontologist who meets SVP professional qualification standards. Work in the area of the discovery shall not resume until authorization is received from the County or City Department of Planning and Building. Field verification Upon discovery of resources Applicant, contractor and County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building CR-1c The Applicant shall design and implement a Worker Education Program that shall be provided to all Project personnel who may encounter and/or alter paleontological resources, including construction supervisors and field personnel. No construction worker shall be involved in field operations without having participated in the Worker Education Program. The training shall be prepared by the Principal Paleontologist and shall provide a description of the fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, outline steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made, and provide contact information for the Project Paleontologist and on-site monitor(s). The training may be conducted concurrent with other environmental or safety awareness and education programs for the Project, provided that the program elements pertaining to paleontological resources is provided by a qualified instructor meeting applicable professional qualifications standards. Review documentat ion Prior to the start of remediation and construction efforts Applicant and County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building CR-2a Prior to issuance of applicable grading permits, the Applicant shall fund and implement a Phase III archaeological data recovery program at Features 21 and 27. The data recovery shall be directed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) with Review program, execution and final technical Prior to land use clearance County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Building 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party expertise in historical archaeology, and shall be carried out in accordance with a Data Recovery Plan prepared in advance by the RPA and approved by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. All artifacts and other remains shall be analyzed according to current professional standards. A final technical report shall be prepared that describes field and laboratory methods, results of technical analysis of recovered materials, and site interpretations. Artifacts, records, and other associated materials shall be deposited with an appropriate curation facility following completion of the work; the Applicant shall be responsible for all curation costs. A Chumash tribal representative shall monitor all excavation. report CR-2b Presently 37 features are located outside the remediation areas of impact. However, if project design plans change to include these areas then prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall fund and implement a Phase II/III archaeological data recovery program at Features 1, 2, 4, 6, 7-9, 12-18, 22-23, 25-26, 28-32, 34-35, 39- 42, 44, 46, 48-50, 52, 53, and 55 . Without proper subsurface testing and evaluation, the significance of each of these features remains unknown. Therefore, for management purposes they are assumed to embody the site’s significant qualities. The data recovery program at these features shall use a phased approach which first defines their significant qualities and then recovers a representative sample. The work shall follow the consolidated approach” outlined in the City of San Luis Obispo Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines (October 2009 edition); the approach shall be described in detail in a Data Recovery Plan prepared in advance by the RPA and approved by the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. The work shall be directed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) with expertise in historical archaeology. If the Applicant’s Consultant completes a separate report on the testing and evaluation of these features, and it is reviewed by the EIR Consultant, then additional testing and/or mitigation may not be required for some of these features. All artifacts and other remains recovered from these features shall be analyzed according to current professional standards. A final technical report shall describe field and laboratory methods, results of Review Program, execution and final technical report Prior to land use clearance County of San Luis Obispo Planning and Building 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-39 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party technical analysis of recovered materials, and site interpretations. Artifacts, records, and other associated materials shall be deposited with an appropriate curation facility following completion of the work; the Applicant shall be responsible for all curation costs. A Chumash tribal representative shall monitor all excavation. CR-2c Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, Features 58-72 shall be documented to Level 1 standards of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). The County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building shall ensure that HAER documentation is carried out by a qualified architectural historian who meets the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History. HAER documentation shall include a Historic Structure Report (HSR) prepared to National Park Service HABS/HAER standards and guidelines. All work shall be fully funded by the Applicant and approved by the County. The HSR shall include a set of measured drawings and large format black-and- white 8-by-10 inch archival quality prints and negatives produced by a professional photographer. The photographs should include a minimum of twelve views, including interior and exterior views of the character-defining elements of the remnant tanks and reservoirs, and existing drawings or historic views. All reports along with two sets of prints shall be submitted to the California State Library in Sacramento and the History Center of San Luis Obispo County. Review documentat ion Prior to land use clearance Applicant and the County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building CR-2d Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit, the Applicant shall insure that construction fencing is placed around the construction zone prior to the start of construction to protect the remaining unevaluated resources outside the Area of Direct Impact (ADI). Fencing shall ensure a minimum buffer of 20 feet around any unevaluated cultural features (unless otherwise determined by a Registered Professional Archaeologist). Areas outside the protective fencing shall be designated as Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA). The fence installation shall be monitored by the RPA to insure no impact to any cultural resources, and shall be periodically inspected by an environmental monitor to ensure that it remains in place throughout the duration of construction. Field verification Prior to the start of remediation and construction efforts Applicant and County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building CR-2e Prior to completion of the grading portion of the remediation component of the Project, the Review plan Prior to remediation Applicant and County of San 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party Applicant shall prepare a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) which is integrated with the long-range Open Space Management Plan. The CRMP shall be approved by the County in consultation with the City. The CRMP shall include, but not limited to, specification of policies and procedures to manage and protect cultural resources on the entire Project Site from impacts by future projects or use of the Project Site. The CRMP preparation and implementation shall be fully funded by the Applicant, developed by a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), and shall be made applicable to the Project Site in perpetuity, through the recordation of restrictive covenants in a form approved by the County, in consultation with the City. and construction efforts. Luis Obispo, Planning and Building CR-2f Prior to completion of the grading portion of the remediation component of the Project and subsequent to completion of Phase III data recovery, the Applicant shall fund the preparation of public interpretive materials including, but not limited to, a small plaque and display kiosks approved by the County in consultation with the City. to be placed in an easily accessible location on the southern and northern parcels of the Project Site, and on a website or static exhibit suitable for display at The History Center, San Luis Obispo Public Library, and/or other appropriate public location within the City of San Luis Obispo. Verify exhibit Within one year of completion of the Phase III data recovery Applicant and County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building CR-3a The Applicant will design and implement a Worker Education Program that will be provided to all Project personnel who may encounter and/or alter historical resources or unique archaeological properties, including construction supervisors and field personnel. No construction worker will be involved in field operations without having participated in the Worker Education Program. The Worker Education Program shall include, at a minimum: 1. A review of archaeology, history, prehistory and Native American cultures associated with historical resources in the Project vicinity. 2. A review of applicable state and local ordinances, laws and regulations pertaining to historic preservation. 3. A discussion of site procedures to be followed in the event that unanticipated cultural resources are discovered during implementation of the Project. 4. A statement by the construction company or Review program; verify training Prior to the start of remediation and construction efforts Applicant and County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-41 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party applicable employer agreeing to abide by the Worker Education Program, City and County policies and other applicable laws and regulations. The Worker Education Program may be conducted in concert with other environmental or safety awareness and education programs for the Project, provided that the program elements pertaining to cultural resources are provided by a qualified instructor meeting applicable professional qualifications standards. CR-3b If prehistoric or historic-period archaeological resources are discovered during any ground disturbing activities, the Applicant or their agents shall immediately cease all work activities within 50 feet of the discovery and immediately notify the City or the County of San Luis Obispo Department of Planning and Building. A Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) shall evaluate the significance of the discovery prior to resuming any activities that could impact the resource. If the archaeologist determines that the find embodies the significant qualities of the Project Site or offers previously unidentified data potential, the area of concern as determined by the RPA shall be avoided or a data recovery plan shall be developed. Any required testing or data recovery and/or curation shall be fully funded by the Applicant and completed by a RPA prior to construction being resumed in the affected area. Work shall not resume until authorization is received from the County and City Department of Planning and Building Field verification Upon discovery of resources Applicant, contractor and County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building CR-4 If potential human remains are discovered, the Applicant or their agents shall comply with Section 15064.5 (e) (1) of the CEQA Guidelines and the Public Resources Code Section 7050.5. All work activities shall immediately cease in the area within approximately 50 feet) of the discovery. A Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) shall inspect the remains and confirm that they are human, and if so shall immediately notify the County and City Departments of Planning and Building and contact the County Coroner in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). As provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, the NAHC shall identify the person or persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The most likely Field Verification Contact the Native American Heritage Commissio n and a Most Likely Descendant must be designated Upon discovery of human remains Applicant, contractor, County of San Luis Obispo, Planning and Building and Coroner’s Office 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-42 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party descendent, in consultation with the County, City, and other Tribal representatives, makes recommendations for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Based on discussions with tribal representatives, fully funded by the Applicant, and subject to concurrence of the Most Likely Descendant MLD), the following treatments of human remains shall be considered (in order of preference): 1. Remains shall be left in place if at all possible through Project redesign; 2. Remains shall be disinterred and reburied on the Project Site in a location not subject to further disturbance; 3. Remains shall be disinterred and reburied in a location provided by the Applicant and/or the County of San Luis Obispo. Any disinterment of human remains shall be carried out with due care and respect, according to archaeological procedures. In situ Native American remains may be documented with drawings, measurements, and other non-destructive methods, but shall not be photographed or subject to destructive analysis without prior approval of the MLD. 4.9.9 References Allen, Rebecca, R. Scott Baxter, Anmarie Medin, Julia G. Costello, and Connie Young Yu. 2002. Excavation of the Woolen Mills Chinatown (CA-SCL-807H), San Jose, Volume I. Prepared for California District of Transportation, District 4. Report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California. Angel, Myron. 1883. History of San Luis Obispo County, California, with Illustrations.Thompson and West, Oakland, California. 1966 facsimile ed. Howell-North Books, Berkeley, California. Arnold, Jeanne E. 1992. Complex Hunter-Gatherer-Fishers of Prehistoric California: Chiefs, Specialists, and Maritime Adaptations of the Channel Islands. American Antiquity 57:60–84. Bertrando, Betsy. 2007. Annotated Index to the Historic Documents “Petitions for Land in the City of San Luis Obispo.” Bertrando and Bertrando Research Consultants, San Luis Obispo, California. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-43 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Bertrando, Ethan, and Betsy Bertrando. 2003. Cultural Resource Inventory: Downtown Water and Sewer Projects 2004, City of San Luis Obispo, CA. Bertrando and Bertrando Research Consultants, San Luis Obispo, California. Prepared for City of San Luis Obispo Public Works Department, San Luis Obispo, California. Blackburn, Thomas C. 1975. December’s Child: A Book of Chumash Oral Narratives. University of California Press, Berkeley. Brady, Roland H. 2008. Paleontological Identification and Evaluation Report for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Remediation and Redevelopment Project. Brady and Associates Geological Services, Fresno, California. Breschini, Gary S., and Trudy Haversat. 1982. California Radiocarbon Dates. 1st ed. Coyote Press, Salinas, California. 1988. Archaeological Excavations at CA-SLO-7 and CA-SLO-8, Diablo Canyon, San Luis Obispo County, California. Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory 28. Coyote Press, Salinas, California. California, State of. 1976. California Inventory of Historic Resources. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento. 1995. California Historical Landmarks. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento. Cleal, John G. 1854. Mission San Luis Obispo, Maps of Private Land Grant Cases of California, Land Case Map 425 ND, page 567. Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. Conway, Thor. 2008. An Archaeological Surface Survey at the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California. Prepared for Padre Associates, Inc., San Luis Obispo, California. Cooper, DeGuy. 1875. Resources of San Luis Obispo County, California. In A Vast Pastoral Domain: San Luis Obispo County in the 1870s. Published 1993 by The Library Associates, Companion Press, Santa Barbara, California. Deetz, James. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. Doubleday, New York. Denardo, Carole, and Racheal Greenlee. 2011. Archaeological Phase II Testing and Evaluation at the Chevron Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. Garcia and Associates GANDA), Lompoc, California.2012. Updated Eligibility Recommendations for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. Garcia and Associates GANDA), Lompoc, California. Denardo, Carole, Racheal Greenlee and Betsy Bertrando. 2013 Archaeological Phase II Testing and Evaluation at the Chevron Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. Garcia and Associates (GANDA), Lompoc, California. Engelhardt, Fr. Zephyrin, O.F.M. 1933. Mission San Luis Obispo in the Valley of the Bears. W. T. Genns, Santa Barbara, California. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-44 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Erlandson, Jon M. 1988. The Role of Shellfish in Prehistoric Economics: A Protein Perspective. American Antiquity 53:102–109. 1991. Shellfish and Seeds as Optimal Resources: Early Holocene Subsistence on the Santa Barbara Coast. In Hunters and Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Roger H. Colten, pp. 89–100. Perspectives in California Archaeology, vol. 1. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. 1994. Early Hunter-Gatherers of the California Coast. Plenum, New York. 1997. The Middle Holocene along the California Coast. In Archaeology of the California Coast during the Middle Holocene, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Michael A. Glassow, pp. 1–10. Perspectives in California Archaeology, vol. 4. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Fitzgerald, Richard T. 1993. Archaic Milling Cultures of the Southern San Francisco Bay Region. Archives of California Prehistory 35. Coyote Press, Salinas, California. 2000. Cross Creek: An Early Holocene/Millingstone Site. California State Water Project, Coast Branch Series, Paper Number 12. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society, San Luis Obispo, California. Gibson, Robert O. 1991. The Chumash. Chelsea House, New York and Philadelphia. Glassow, Michael A. 1992. The Relative Dietary Importance of Marine Foods through Time in Western Santa Barbara County. In Essays on the Prehistory of Maritime California, edited by Terry L. Jones, pp. 115–128. Center for Archaeological Research Publication No. 10. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis. 1997. Research Issues of Importance to Coastal California Archaeology of the Middle Holocene. In Archaeology of the California Coast during the Middle Holocene, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Michael A. Glassow, pp. 151–161. Perspectives in California Archaeology, vol. 4. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Glassow, Michael A., and Larry R. Wilcoxon. 1988. Coastal Adaptations near Point Conception, California, with Particular Regard to Shellfish Exploitation. American Antiquity 53:36–51. Glassow, Michael A., Larry R. Wilcoxon, and Jon M. Erlandson. 1988. Cultural and Environmental Change during the Early Period of Santa Barbara Channel Prehistory. In The Archaeology of Prehistoric Coastlines, edited by Geoff N. Bailey and John E. Parkington, pp. 64–77. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Grant, Campbell. 1993. The Rock Paintings of the Chumash. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History and EZ Nature Books, San Luis Obispo, California. Originally published 1965, University of California Press. Greenwood, Roberta S. 1972. 9000 Years of Prehistory at Diablo Canyon, San Luis Obispo County, California. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Occasional Paper 7. 1978. Obispeño and Purisimeño Chumash. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 520–523. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-45 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Hall, C. 2007. Introduction to the Geology of California and its Native Plants. University of California Press, London. Hall, C.A., and Prior, S. W. 1975. Geologic Map of the Cayucos-San Luis Obispo Region. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-686, San Luis Obispo County, California. Harrison, William M. 1964. Prehistory of the Santa Barbara Coast, California. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson. Hudson, Travis, and Thomas C. Blackburn. 1982–1987. The Material Culture of the Chumash Interaction Sphere. 5 vols. Ballena Press, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Los Altos, California. Hudson, Travis, Janice Timbrook, and Melissa Rempe. 1978. Tomol: Chumash Watercraft as Described in the Ethnographic Notes of John P. Harrington. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers No. 9. Los Altos, California. Hudson, Travis, and Ernst Underhay. 1978. Crystals in the Sky: An Intellectual Odyssey Involoving Chumash Astronomy, Cosmology, and Rock Art. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers 10. Socorro, New Mexico. Jefferson, G. T., H. L. Fierstine, J.R Westling, and K. The-Lung. 1992. Pleistocene Terrestrial Vertebrates near Point San Luis and other Localities in San Luis Obispo County, California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 91(1). Johnson, John R.1988. Chumash Social Organization: An Ethnohistoric Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara. Jones, Deborah A. 2004. Extended Phase I Archaeological Investigation for the Santa Ysabel Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Project, Los Osos, San Luis Obispo County, California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis, California. Prepared for The Morro Group, Inc., San Luis Obispo, California. Jones, Terry L., Kathleen Davis, Glenn Farris, Steven D. Grantham, Teresa W. Fung, and Betty Rivers. 1994. Towards a Prehistory of Morro Bay: Phase II Archaeological Investigations for the Highway 41 Widening Project, San Luis Obispo County, California. Submitted to the California Department of Transportation, Environmental Branch, San Luis Obispo, California. Jones, Terry L., and Deborah A. Jones. 1992. Elkhorn Slough Revisited: Reassessing the Chronology of CA-MNT-229. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 14:159– 179. Jones,Terry L., and Kathryn A. Klar (editors).2007. California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture and Complexity. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, California. Jones, Terry L., Richard T. Fitzgerald, and Judith F. Porcasi. 2008. The Cross Creek-Diablo Canyon Complex of South Central California: Mid-latitude Foragers at the Pleistocene Holocene Boundary. North Pacific Prehistory 2:169–202. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-46 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Jones, Terry L., Sebastian C. Garza, Judith Porcasi, and Jereme W. Gaeta. 2009. Another Trans-Holocene Sequence from Diablo Canyon: New Faunal and Radiocarbon Findings from CA-SLO-585, San Luis Obispo County, California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 29(1):19–31. Jones, Terry L., and Georgie Waugh. 1993. Little Pico Creek Revisited: Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-SLO-175 and CA-SLO-1259, San Luis Obispo, California. On file, California Department of Transportation, Environmental Division, Sacramento. 1995. Central California Coastal Prehistory: A View from Little Pico Creek. Perspectives in California Archaeology, vol. 3. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. King, Chester D. 1990. Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region before A.D. 1804. Garland, New York. Kocher, Paul H. 1972. Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa, 1772–1972: A Historical Sketch. Blake Printing & Publishing, Inc., San Luis Obispo, California. Krieger, Daniel E. 1988. Looking Backward into the Middle Kingdom: San Luis Obispo County. 1st ed. Windsor Publications, Northridge, California. Kroeber, Alfred L. 1976. Handbook of the Indians of California. Reprinted. Dover Publications, New York. Originally published 1925, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 78, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Landberg, Leif. 1965. The Chumash Indians of Southern California. Southwest Museum Papers No. 19. Los Angeles. Lathrop, D. W., and R. T. Troike. 1984. California Historical Linguistics and Archaeology. Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society 15(1/2):99–157. Lebow, Clayton G. 2000. Changing Land-Use Strategies on Vandenberg Air Force Base. In Eligibility Testing at CA-SBA-935, -2321, and -2345 for El Niño Related Road Repairs, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, by Douglas R. Harro, Clayton G. Lebow, Rebecca L. McKim, Christopher Ryan, and Carole Denardo, pp. 8-1–8-14. Applied EarthWorks, Inc., Fresno, California, for Tetra Tech, Inc., Santa Barbara, California. Submitted to 30 CES/CEV, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, USAF Contract No. F04684-95-C-0045. Little, Barbara, and Erika Martin Seibert, Jan Townsend, John H. Sprinkle, Jr., and John Knoerl. 2000. Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Archeological Properties. National Register Bulletin 36. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, National Register, History, and Education. McGuire, Kelly R., and William R. Hildebrandt. 1994. The Possibilities of Women and Men: Gender and the California Milling Stone Horizon. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 16:41–59. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology December 2013 4.9-47 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mikkelsen, Patricia, William Hildebrandt, and Deborah Jones. 2000. Prehistoric Adaptations on the Shores of Morro Bay Estuary: Excavations at Site CA-SLO-165, Morro Bay, California. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Occasional Paper No. 14. Miller, Henry. 1856. Account of a Tour of the California Missions. Book Club of America, San Francisco. Reprinted 1985, in Mission in the Valley of the Bears, compiled and edited by Francis J. Weber, pp. 40–41. Libra Press, Hong Kong. Mission San Luis Obispo. 1937. Mission brochure. Reprinted 1985, in Mission in the Valley of the Bears, compiled and edited by Francis J. Weber, pp. 162–163. Libra Press, Hong Kong. Mitchell, Grace Therese. 1930. The Story of Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa in the Valley of the Bears. San Miguel, California. Reprinted 1985, in Mission in the Valley of the Bears, compiled and edited by Francis J. Weber, pp. 124–136. Libra Press, Hong Kong. Monitor, The, 1938. Story of the Old Mission. Reprinted 1985, in Mission in the Valley of the Bears, pp. 165–166, compiled and edited by Francis J. Weber. Libra Press, Hong Kong. Moratto, Michael J. 1984. California Archaeology. Academic Press, New York and London. Nettles, Wendy M. 2006. The Copelands Project: Neophytes, Shopkeepers, and the Soiled Doves of San Luis Obispo, with contributions by M. Colleen Hamilton, Barry A. Price, Rachael Nixon, Virginia S. Popper, Kholood Abdo-Hintzman, Mary Clark Baloian, John D. Goodman II, Sherri M. Gust, Ann M. Munns, Dina M. Coleman, and Keith Warren. Applied EarthWorks, Inc., Fresno, California. Submitted to City of San Luis Obispo Department of Community Development, San Luis Obispo, California. Orr, Phil C.1968. Prehistory of Santa Rosa Island, California. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California. Palóu, Francisco. 1926. Historical Memoirs of New California by Fray Francisco Palou, O.F.M. Translated and edited from the archives of New Mexico by Herbert Eugene Bolton. Atheneum House, Boston. Patch, D., and T. Jones. 1984. Paleoenvironmental Change at Elkhorn Slough: Implications for Human Adaptive Strategies. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 6(1):19–43. Paulson, Luther L. 1875. Handbook and Directory of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and San Diego Counties. Francis & Valentine Commercial Steam Press, San Francisco. Rivers, Betty. 2000.A Line through the Past: Historical and Ethnographic Background for the Branch Canal. California State Water Project, Coastal Branch Series 1. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society, San Luis Obispo, California. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP). 2010. Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Impact Mitigation Guidelines Revision Committee. Tognazzini, Wilmar N. (compiler). 1993. 100 Years Ago, 1893: Excerpts from the San Luis Obispo Morning Tribune.W. N. Tognazzini, San Luis Obispo, California. 4.9 Cultural Resources and Archaeology Chevron Tank Farm 4.9-48 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR True, Delbert L., Martin A. Baumhoff, and J. E. Hellen. 1979. Milling Stone Cultures in Northern California: Berryessa I. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 1:124– 154. Wallace, William J. 1978. Post-Pleistocene Archeology, 9000 to 2000 B.C. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 25–36. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Warren, Claude N. 1968. Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, edited by C. Irwin- Williams, pp. 1–14. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology No. 1(3). Webb, Edith Buckland. 1983. Indian Life at the Old Missions. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. Woodbourne, M.O. 2004. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Biostratigraphy and Geochronology. Columbia University Press, New York. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources This section assesses visual impacts that may result from the proposed Project. It assesses if a change in the visual environment would occur, whether that change would be perceived as a positive or negative one, and the significance of any change relative to the existing setting. The focus of this section is on the potential for the Project to result in impacts to sensitive visual resources, primarily as seen from public roadways and public viewing areas. This section provides a photographic and written inventory of existing area conditions in the Project area and establishes the baseline visual character. The analysis identifies the visual resources in the area and any related landforms, vegetative groupings, and other features which enhance the visual quality of key viewing areas. Photographs from selected, key viewing areas provide the basis for analyzing the potential effects of the proposed Project. Realistic photo simulations document the Project impacts and show the effectiveness of recommended mitigation measures. The photo simulations identify changes to the Project Site and to the area’s visual character as a result of the proposed Project. Project impacts are determined by evaluating the physical changes proposed by the Project in the context of the existing and surrounding landscape, as seen from key viewing locations. Project impact determinations are consistent with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and community scenic values as identified in San Luis Obispo County (County) and City of San Luis Obispo (City) planning policies, ordinances, and goals. 4.10.1 Environmental Setting The Project Site is on approximately 332 acres of gently sloped topography, altered by creation of berms, pads, and remnant oil reservoirs east of U.S. Highway 101 and south of the City of San Luis Obispo (the City). The City lies along the flatlands of San Luis Obispo Creek. Situated in the central region of San Luis Obispo County, the Project Site is generally in the valley within the coastal range with the Irish Hills, San Miguelito, and the Corral de Piedra Mountains to the west and south, and the Los Padres National Forest to the north and east. The Project Site is just south of a set of 600-foot-high hills called the South Street Hills, which are a southern continuation of the “Sisters” or the “Morros,” including Cerro Romualdo, Chumash Peak, Bishop Peak, and Cerro San Luis Obispo. The South Street Hills are home to a water tank and a radio station tower and to the South Higuera Street webcam SLOWeather.com), which partially looks over the Project Site in the distance. The chain of Morros” forms the dominant scenic backdrop to nearly all parts of the City and the South Street Hills just north of the Project Site are clearly visible from all areas of the site, forming backdrops to many views. Views from the Project Site to the north are set against the coastal mountains and the South Street Hills extensions with undeveloped, rolling grasslands. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Views to the east are set against the coastal ranges in the far-field with some continuation of the Morros,” including Islay Hill and Mine Hill. This area is populated by residences and businesses along Broad Street (State Route 227), all of which can be seen in the distance intermittently from different locations. Some pronounced night lighting is also visible at the Damon-Garcia sports fields. Views to the west are set against the coastal ranges with industry, businesses, roadways, and U.S. Highway 101. Views to the south are also set against the coastal mountains with the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA) and some sparsely placed residential locations, along with predominant agricultural and rural lands. The Project Site is bisected by Tank Farm Road and has a number of existing tank berms which rise approximately 20 to 30 feet and are visible from Tank Farm Road. The majority of the Project Site is uncultivated grasslands and open space. There are currently a few buildings on the Project Site; all of the buildings are located along the western edge of the site, north of Tank Farm Road (see Chapter 2.0, Project Description). Other visible development on the Project Site includes utility poles located along the north side of Tank Farm Road and along the north of the site. Several airport runway lights are located on the Project Site on the south side of Tank Farm Road and west of Hoover Avenue. Unpaved roads cross the site, associated with site maintenance activities, and post-and-wire or chain-link fencing surrounds the perimeter of the majority of the site and along both sides of Tank Farm Road. Figure 4.10-1 shows where photographs were taken of the Project Site from key viewing areas. The key viewing areas include: From Tank Farm Road west of the Project Site looking northeast (No. 1); From Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site looking northeast (No. 2); From Tank Farm Road at the east end of the Project Site looking northwest (No. 3); From Broad Street (State Route 227) north of the Project Site looking southwest (No. 4); and From Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site looking southwest (No. 5). Figures 4.10-2 through 4.10-6 document the existing visual setting and visual quality of the Project Site from the selected key viewing areas and are cross-referenced using the above numbering. These same viewing areas are used in the impact section with the simulated views that include the proposed Project. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-1 Key Viewing Locations 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-2 Key Viewing Location No. 1 from Tank Farm Road west of the Project Site - Current 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-3 Key Viewing Location No. 2 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site - Current 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-4 Key Viewing Location No. 3 from Tank Farm Road at the east end of the Project Site - Current 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-5 Key Viewing Location No. 4 from Broad Street (State Route 227) north of the Project Site – Current 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-6 Key Viewing Location No. 5 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site – Current Source: Google Earth 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Photo simulations are generated by developing a series of baseline pictures from critical viewing areas and then inserting Project components into the baseline pictures to “simulate” how the area will appear for the proposed Project. The individual characteristics of the simulations are defined by utilizing GIS software along with Project-component heights to define the perspectives used in the photo simulations. Section 4.10.2.1 describes different methodologies used to determine impacts of scenic views. 4.10.2 Regulatory Setting Regulatory issues related to visual impacts are included in both the County and the City’s General Plans and corresponding ordinances. The following sections describe each of these as well as federal methodologies related to scenic view assessment. 4.10.2.1 Federal Different federal agencies responsible for scenic views have developed a number of different methodologies to determine the impact of projects. The agencies include the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, and the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Each of these approaches is briefly discussed below. Bureau of Land Management The BLM has developed a system called Visual Resource Management system that provides a way to identify and evaluate scenic values to determine the appropriate levels of management. It consists of two stages: Inventory (Visual Resource Inventory) and Analysis (Visual Resource Contrast Rating). The inventory stage involves identifying the visual resources of an area and assigning them to inventory classes using BLM’s visual resource inventory process. The process involves rating the visual appeal of a tract of land, measuring public concern for scenic quality, and determining whether the tract of land is visible from travel routes or observation points. The process is described in detail in BLM Handbook H-8410-1, Visual Resource Inventory (BLM 1986). The inventory consists of a scenic quality evaluation, sensitivity level analysis, and a delineation of distance zones. Based on these three factors, BLM-administered lands are placed into one of four visual resource inventory classes. These inventory classes represent the relative value of the visual resources. Class I (preserve the existing character of the landscape) being the most valued, Class II (preserve the existing character of the landscape with low level of changes), Class III allowing moderate changes to the landscape, and Class IV allowing major changes to the landscape. See Figure 4.10-7. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-7 BLM Visual Inventory Class Determination If adjacent area is Class III/IV, assign Class III/IV. Source: BLM Manual H-8410-1 USDA Forest Service The USDA has developed a system called the Scenery Management System (SMS) for managing scenery and ensuring a systematic approach for determining the value and importance of scenery in national forests. This approach is detailed in the Forest Service Agricultural handbook Number 701 (USDA 1995). The SMS assessment is based on a combination of “scenic attractiveness,” “scenic integrity,” “landscape concern level,” and “landscape visibility” to produce a scenic class rating from 1 to 7. Scenic Attractiveness is categorized into three classes: Class A – distinctive; Class B – typical, and Class C – indistinctive. Scenic Integrity is a measure of the degree of intactness and wholeness of the landscape; or the degree of visible disruption of the landscape character. Landscape Visibility is composed of two parts: human values as they relate to the relative importance to the public of various scenes (concern level) and the relative sensitivity of scenes based on distance from an observer (distance zones). The determination of the scenic class is made from the figure below (Figure 4.10-8). Note that for all areas that have a high concern level, the scenic class is the highest rating of a 1 for high scenic attractiveness and only in the foreground for areas that have lower scenic attractiveness. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-8 USDA Scenic Class Determination Source: USDA Agriculture Handbook Number 701. USDOT Federal Highway Administration The USDOT approach is defined also as Visual Resource Management (VRM) and is similar to the BLM methodology. It utilizes a combination of the visual character, the visual quality with the viewer sensitivity, and exposure to determine the visual impact. The impacts of a project are defined by a combination of the changes to the visual quality and the level of viewer sensitivity. The higher the sensitivity of an area, the less tolerant it is to changes or degradation in the viewshed. Areas of high visual quality would include wilderness areas, rivers in the National Wild and Scenic River System, parks, recreational areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic districts, sites, and buildings. Adverse impacts would be considered to be ones that are “out of character with the property or would alter its setting.” See Table 4.10-1. Table 4.10-1 Indicators of Visual Sensitivity High Sensitivity/Concern Views of and from areas the aesthetic values of which are protected in laws, public regulations and policies, and public planning documents. Views of and from designated areas of aesthetic, recreational, cultural, or scientific interest, including national, state, county, and community parks, reserves, memorials, scenic roads, trails, interpretive sites of scientific value, scenic overlooks, recreation areas, and historic structures, sites, and districts. Views from resort areas or urban residential subdivisions. Views from national- or state-designated scenic highways or roads, or designated scenic highways or roads of regional importance and from segments of travel routes, such as roads, rail lines, pedestrian and equestrian trails, and bicycle paths near designated areas of aesthetic, recreational, cultural, or scientific interest leading directly to them. Views seen while approaching an area of interest may be closely related to the appreciation of the aesthetic, cultural, scientific, or recreational significance of that destination. Moderate Sensitivity/Concern Views from segments of travel routes near highly sensitive use areas of interest, serving as a secondary access route to those areas. Views from rural residential areas and segments of roads near them, which serve as their primary access route. Views of and from undesignated but protected or popularly used or appreciated areas of aesthetic, recreational, cultural or scientific significance at the local, county, or state level. Views from highways or roads locally designated as scenic routes and of importance only to the local population, or informally designated as such in literature, road maps and road atlases. Views from travel routes, such as roads, trails, bicycle paths, and equestrian trails leading directly to protected 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.10-1 Indicators of Visual Sensitivity or popularly used undesignated areas important for their aesthetic, recreational, cultural, or scientific interest. Views of and from religious facilities and cemeteries. Low Sensitivity/Concern Views from travel routes serving as secondary access to moderately sensitive areas. Views from farmsteads, groupings of fewer than four residences, industrial, research/development, commercial, and agricultural use areas. 4.10.2.2 San Luis Obispo County The Project Site is currently within the jurisdiction of the County. The regulatory setting pertaining to visual resources includes review of the Project’s consistency with various elements of the County of San Luis Obispo General Plan and the County of San Luis Obispo Land Use Ordinance, Title 22, in addition to the review of findings made in this document per CEQA Guidelines. County Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) The State of California mandates that every jurisdiction have an Open Space Element in their General Plan. As noted in the COSE, one of the purposes of the open space section is to identify open space lands that are worthy of protection for their intrinsic value, and establish goals, policies and implementation measures that will enable the long-term protection of those resources. Visual Resources Policy VR 4.1 identifies potentially scenic corridors (in Table VR-2) that warrant further study to determine whether or not portions of these corridors should be officially designated a scenic resource by the County. None of the listed corridors are within the vicinity of the Project Site. County General Plan Land Use Element – San Luis Obispo Area Plan The Project is within the San Luis Obispo Inland planning area. The San Luis Obispo Area Plan includes the following vision statement: This plan's vision for the future includes continued opportunities for economic vitality and growth, along with the opportunity to maintain the environmental attributes that have themselves contributed to the area's historically healthy economy. The community's excellent living environment and educational opportunities can act to attract or retain businesses providing high quality job opportunities for local residents, enabling them to afford housing within the area, while also enhancing local tax revenues needed for public services. The planning area should maintain a rural character in harmony with agriculture, business, recreational, environmental and residential opportunities. These San Luis Obispo Area Plan Goals relate to visual aspects: 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Protect and, where it has been degraded, enhance wildlife habitat areas; Protect the scenic values of natural landforms; Protect important historic or archaeological resources; Focus urban development within established urban and village areas; Devote the remainder of the planning area to a "greenbelt" consisting of production agriculture and low-density development (also see Framework for Planning); and Encourage economic development balanced with the natural resources that enhance the natural beauty and character, and supports the social and environmental health of the planning area. Section 5A, Scenic Roads and Highways, defines the area within 100 feet of State Route 227 as a Highway Corridor Design Area subject to the standards of development described in Section 22.108-2 of the County Land Use Ordinance, Title 22, for Sensitive Resource Areas. The Land Use Element states that “foreground views along highways and railroads are identified in a highway corridor design area.” These areas are close enough to the viewing public to reveal individual trees, rock outcrops, creeks, hillsides, and historic structures such as farmhouses and barns. These elements of the scenic corridors have their own scenic values, while they also serve to frame and enhance views of the more distant scenic backdrops. County General Plan Land Use Ordinance State Route 227, near the Project Site, is subject to the Highway Corridor Design Standards as defined in the San Luis County General Plan Land Use Element and Land Use Ordinance. The Highway Corridor Design Standards are intended to protect views of scenic backdrops and background vistas and foreground views from scenic roads and highways, and other environmental resources that provide habitat and watershed drainage. The County Design Guidelines document prepared by the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building consists of “design objectives, guidelines, and examples that will help retain and enhance the unique character of the unincorporated communities and rural areas of San Luis Obispo County.” These design guidelines should be considered in Project design: RC-7a. Where possible, large cuts and graded pads should be avoided to minimize the alteration of natural contours. RC-7b. Building masses should generally follow contours. RC-7e. Artificial slopes that are visible to the public should match the natural contours in the immediate vicinity. 4.10.2.3 City of San Luis Obispo The regulatory setting pertaining to visual resources for the City includes review of the proposed development’s consistency with various elements of the City’s General Plan, Community Design Guidelines, the Municipal Code, and the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP). 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Chapter 1 of the City General Plan addresses land use. The following Community Goals relate to visual aspects: Protect and enhance the natural environment, including the quality of air, water, soil, and open space (Goal 2). Protect public views of the surrounding hills and mountains (Goal 4). Develop buildings and places which complement the natural landscape and the fabric of neighborhoods (Goal 34). Section 1.7.5 Building Design and Siting is a growth management policy related to visual aspects. All new buildings and structures should be subordinate to and in harmony with the surrounding landscape. The City should encourage County adoption of regulations prohibiting new structures on ridge lines or in other visually prominent or environmentally sensitive locations, and allowing transfer of development rights from one parcel to another in order to facilitate this policy. Chapter 2 of the City General Plan addresses circulation. Figure 11 in the conservation and open space element identifies areas of Broad Street (State Route 227) as either High Scenic Value or High or Moderate Scenic Value, while Tank Farm Road in the Project area is designated as High or Moderate Scenic Value. The following Chapter 2 policies apply: 15.0.1 Views: The City will preserve and improve views of important scenic resources from streets and roads. In particular, the rout segments shown in Figure 6 and the Conservation and Open Space Element are designated as scenic roadways. Development projects shall not wall off scenic roadways and block views. Development projects, including signs, in the viewshed of a scenic roadway shall be considered “sensitive” and require architectural review. 15.0.2 Scenic Routes: The route segments on Figure 6 and in Figure 11 of the Conservation and Open Space Element – Scenic Roadways Map – are designated as scenic roadways. 15.0.3 Development Along Scenic Routes: Development along scenic roadways should not block views or detract from the quality of views. Projects in the viewshed of a scenic roadway should be considered as “sensitive” and require architectural review. Development projects should not wall off scenic roadways and block views. As part of the city’s environmental review process, blocking of views along scenic roadways should be considered a significant environmental impact. Signs along scenic roadways should not clutter vistas or views. Street lights should be low scale and focus light at intersections where it is most needed. Tall light standards should be avoided. Street lighting should be integrated with other street furniture at locations where views are least disturbed. However, safety priorities should remain superior to scenic concerns. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City General plan conservation and open space element specifically addresses views in Chapter 6. These policies relate to visual aspects: Any development that is permitted in natural or agricultural landscapes shall be visually subordinate to and compatible with the landscape features. Development includes, but is not limited to buildings, signs (including billboard signs), roads, utility and telecommunication lines, and structures. Such development shall: (1) avoid visually prominent locations such as ridgelines and slopes exceeding 20 percent; (2) avoid unnecessary grading, vegetation removal, and site lighting; (3) incorporate building forms, architectural materials, and landscaping that respect the setting, including the historical pattern of development in similar settings, and avoid stark contrasts with its setting; (4) preserve scenic or unique landforms; significant trees in terms of size, age, species, or rarity; and rock outcroppings (Policy 9.1.1). The City will promote the creation of “streetscapes” and linear scenic parkways or corridors that promote the City’s visual quality and character, enhance adjacent uses, and integrate roadways with surrounding districts (Policy 9.1.4). The City will include in all environmental review and carefully consider effects of new development, streets, and road construction on views and visual quality by applying the Community Design Guidelines, height restrictions, hillside standards, Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, and the CEQA Guidelines (Policy 9.1.5). The City will preserve and improve views of important scenic resources from public places, and encourage other agencies with jurisdiction to do so. Public places include parks, plazas, the grounds of civic buildings, streets and roads, and publicly accessible open space. Development projects shall not wall off scenic roadways and block views. Utilities, traffic signals, and public and private signs and lights shall not intrude on or clutter views, consistent with safety needs. Where important vistas of distant landscape features occur along streets, street trees shall be clustered to facilitate viewing of the distant features. Development projects, including signs, in the viewshed of a scenic roadway shall be considered “sensitive” and require architectural review (Policy 9.2.1). Outdoor lighting shall avoid: operating at unnecessary locations, levels, and times; spillage to areas not needing or wanting illumination; glare (intense line-of-site contrast); and frequencies (colors) that interfere with astronomical viewing (Policy 9.2.3). The City Community Design Guidelines include numerous references to techniques that should be included in a development to reduce visual impacts. The visual impact of parking lots should be minimized by locating these facilities near the portion of the site least visible from the street and by providing adequate screening and parking lot landscaping (Guideline 3.1.C.2.i). Trees shall be used in parking lots to help visually break up large expanses of paving and to provide some shading (Guideline 3.1.C.3.c). 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Structures more than 20 feet in height (typical for structures of two stories or more) should step back the building mass at least 5 feet for the portions of the structure above 14 feet (or the height where an actual second story begins) to provide visual variation (Guideline 3.2.D.4.a). Loading docks, trash collection areas, outdoor storage, and similar facilities should be incorporated into the overall design of the building and landscaped, so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully contained, and out of view from adjacent properties and streets (Guideline 3.2.E). Metal buildings should employ a variety of building forms, shapes, colors, materials, and other architectural treatments to add visual interest and variety to the building (Guideline 3.3.I.2). Appropriate techniques should be used to assure that tall buildings respect the context of their setting and provide an appropriate visual transition to adjacent structures (Guideline 4.2.B.2). Roof penetrations (such as plumbing and exhaust vents, air conditioner units, and transformer boxes) should be grouped together where feasible to minimize their visual impact. The roof design should help to screen or camouflage rooftop protrusions (Guideline 6.1.D.3). Planting areas should be integrated with the building design, enhance the appearance and enjoyment of the Project, and soften the visual impact of buildings and paving (Guideline 6.2.B.1). Each structure shall be located in the most accessible, least visually prominent, most geologically stable, portion of the site and at the lowest feasible elevation (Guideline 7.2.A.3). The City Municipal Code addresses visual impacts through a number of ordinances mostly addressing building height and density, including the following: Size limits on large-scale retail establishments (Chapter 17.16.035); Property development standards for conservation and open space zones with a building height of 35 feet (Chapter 17.32.020); Property development standards for office zones with a building height of 35 to 45 feet Chapter 17.34.020); Property development standards for neighborhood commercial zones with a building height of 35 feet (Chapter 17.38.020); Property development standards for retail commercial zones with a building height of 45 feet Chapter 17.40.020); Property development standards for downtown commercial zones with a building height of 50 to 75 feet (Chapter 17.42.020); Property development standards for tourist commercial zones with a building height of 45 feet (Chapter 17.44.020); 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Property development standards for service commercial zones with a building height of 35 feet (Chapter 17.46.020); and Property development standards for manufacturing zones with a building height of 35 feet with 75 percent coverage and a maximum of 25 units per acre (Chapter 17.48.020). The Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) discusses the preservation of views and scenic resources. Tank Farm Road from the western Project boundary heading east is considered a gateway to and from the City, as identified in Table 5.4 of the AASP. The following goals in the AASP apply to the Project: Goal 5.7: Unobstructed public view of key scenic features from major planning area roadways. Goal 5.8: Attractive gateways that provide a positive announcement of entry into the City and the Airport Area. 4.10.3 Significance Criteria In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines and the thresholds of significance used in several recently prepared City and County EIRs, impacts would be significant if development would: Create a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista; Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway; Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings; Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area; or Result in an inconsistency with plans, goals, laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards applicable to the protection of visual resources. The County and City planning documents do not contain specific criteria for determining thresholds of significance regarding aesthetic resources. However, in comparing the Project to the CEQA Guideline thresholds, substantial consideration was given to the Project’s consistency with public policies, plans, goals, and regulations concerning scenic vistas, scenic roadways, visual character, and night lighting. The goals, policies, and guidelines listed in the Regulatory Setting Section, including the BLM, USDA Forest Service and USDOT, provide a basis for determining levels of potential impact as well as an indication of aesthetic values and sensitivity to visual change. 4.10.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Remediation of the area would alter the existing visual character of the Project Site and create a new short-term source of light and glare caused by storage areas, vehicles and the temporary 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR signalized intersection not currently found on the Project Site. Remediation of the area would require the import and export of soils and materials as well as the use of construction equipment at the various staging areas, borrow areas and work areas. Grading, cut, and fill activities on the Project Site would take place along with re-vegetation/restoration. Impacts of these activities and changes on the scenic quality of the area are discussed below. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AE.1 The Project remediation activities could degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Remediation Class II The remediation component of the proposed Project would take approximately 2.5 years and would involve short-term remediation in advance of the development phases. As a result, the remediation phase could degrade the existing visual character or quality of the Project Site and its surroundings. The remediation phase would involve the following five elements that could produce short-term visual impacts: staging areas, borrow areas, material stockpiles, work areas, traffic, and traffic control measures. As identified in Figure 2-12, three main and four auxiliary staging areas are proposed at the Project Site. Mobilization activities would occur at these staging areas and would include fueling and minor maintenance work on vehicles and equipment, stockpiling clean and impacted excavated soils, moving equipment and construction support facilities/trailers on-site, installing storm water and dust control best management practices, and creating habitat protection measures. Figure 2-12 also identifies four borrow areas to include the Flower Mound at the northeastern portion of the Project Site and the berms adjacent to Reservoirs 5 and 7. The Flower Mound excavation (approximately 17.3 acres) will require blasting after which, blasted materials would be crushed with a rock crushing machine and may be sorted with loaders and/or stationary sorting screens and then washed. This process will reduce the elevation of the Flower Mound to allow for the Santa Fe Road extension, which will alter the existing visual character of the area. Multiple work areas are shown in Figure 2-12 as well. Work area activities include demolition, pipeline decommissioning, Reservoir 2 reconfiguration, and miscellaneous clean-up. Demolition includes the removal of existing infrastructure, such as concrete walls, barb-wire fencing, utilities, and concrete foundations. Pipeline decommissioning involves excavating and removing pipe segments that could not be adequately cleaned. This would include cutting the segments into manageable pieces, wrapping them in plastic, removing them from the trench, and backfilling the trench. Scrap pipe would be temporarily stored in bins and transported off-site for recycling. Reservoir 2 reconfiguration involves cutting the wall and grading the berm to a smoother topography, which means lowering the berm height between four and eight feet. Miscellaneous clean-up involves crushing the two debris piles along the north property line for reuse as gravel on-site, removing the concrete vault wall and hand rail adjacent to Reservoir 6, 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR and using a backhoe to expose three historic water well areas. Further, fencing and signs would be installed throughout the Project Site in order to implement institutional controls for management of the area for wildlife habitat. Project Site traffic would include employee vehicles, construction equipment transport, and on- and off-site trucks used for water and fill transport. Project Site traffic control would include installation of a temporary signalized intersection at the main access point to the site to provide safe ingress and egress for Project-related traffic. In short, these activities would involve demolition of existing infrastructure, stockpiling of grading and removed material, establishment of a nursery, equipment staging, and removal of natural features from the site such as the Flower Mound. These activities would present a change from the existing visual character; that is, a shift from a non-active, serene environment to one that is active and contains artificial objects (i.e., trucks and water tanks) with varying heights and masses. These activities would also generate light and glare impacts; that is, storage areas, vehicles and the temporary signalized intersection would produce light not currently found on the Project Site. As stated above, these remediation activities would be short-term and take place over approximately 2.5 years. Although graded areas during these construction activities would be visible from Tank Farm Road and Prado Road, these graded areas would be re-vegetated (and potentially developed during later phases of the proposed Project) and would not produce long- term visual impacts. However, the removal of the Flower Mound would produce a long-term visual impact as the topographic feature would no longer exist and would at some point, over the life of the Project, be replaced with physical development, such as the Santa Fe Road extension, parking lot(s), and commercial services building(s). Moreover, there would be between 54 and 69 acres of development pads throughout the life of the Project, but less than half of those pads would be physically developed after ten years (five years per phase). Graded areas on not-yet-developed pads could become unsightly due to uncontrolled weed growth, thereby causing both short-term and long-term visual impacts. In order to mitigate this impact, graded areas for development pads that would not be built on within two years of Project initiation, would be naturally re-vegetated. Natural re-vegetation does not include unchecked weed growth. Rather, natural re-vegetation includes temporary landscaping or other measures used to cover exposed soils, while maintaining weed growth. Impacts would therefore be considered potentially significant. Mitigation Measures AE-1a The Applicant shall ensure that graded areas for development pads that are not built on within two years of creation of the development pads, are temporarily landscaped or otherwise maintained as needed to cover exposed soils and maintain growth of weeds. Weeds shall be controlled to not be unsightly. AE-1b The Applicant shall ensure that fencing installed throughout the Project Site in order to implement institutional controls for management of the area for wildlife habitat shall contribute to the aesthetic character of the site and vicinity. Prior to issuance of grading permits for sites where fencing is required, the applicant shall submit to the 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR County Department of Planning and Building for review and approval, in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo, site fencing plans. The plans shall include: fencing types that meet the functional requirements for the intuitional controls; fencing locations; materials and color palette consistent with City of San Luis Obispo design guidelines; and, as needed, complementary landscape to break-up the public view of the fencing. Residual Impacts Ensuring the development pads that will not be built on within two years of creation of the pads would be landscaped or maintained to manage weed growth would reduce the visual impacts of the proposed Project. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.10.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Photo simulations were prepared in order to better understand and communicate the potential visual changes associated with the City Development Plan. Photo simulation locations were selected to best show critical views, how the Project would compare to applicable planning policy, or from viewpoints that would provide a good representation of the overall Project character. See Figures 4.10-9 through 4.10-12. No specific architectural styles are proposed for the commercial or recreational development in the City Development Plan portion of the Project. The specific types of commercial and industrial units shown in the photo simulations are not proposed by the Applicant. The structure images are representative only and are based on the appearance of typical buildings found on similar developments on the Central Coast. The structures shown in the simulations are a representation of the maximum height allowed for each lot, or the self-imposed height restrictions proposed by the Project, and depict a reasonable building scale and form. The photo simulations show the development approximately five to ten years after construction. Impacts associated with the City Development Plan are discussed below. As previously stated, photo simulations are generated by developing a series of baseline pictures from critical viewing areas and then inserting Project components into the baseline pictures to simulate” how the area will appear for the proposed Project. The individual characteristics of the simulations are defined by utilizing GIS software along with Project component heights to define the perspectives used in the photo simulations. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AE.2 The City Development Plan component of the Project would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Development Class II Although the transition would take approximately 25 years to complete, the Project would change the character of the site from a rural setting to a semi-urban developed setting. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-9 Key Viewing Location No. 1 from Tank Farm Road west of the Project Site - Proposed 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-10 Key Viewing Location No. 2 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site – Proposed 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-11 Key Viewing Location No. 3 from Tank Farm Road at the east end of the Project Site – Proposed 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.10-12 Key Viewing Location No. 4 from Broad Street (State Route 227) north of the Project Site - Proposed 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City Development Plan proposes development of the Project Site with approximately 803,000 square feet of commercial and industrial floor area with associated parking, landscaping, open space, recreational playing fields, bicycle and pedestrian trails. The City development could also include land for the City to construct public facilities, such as a transit maintenance yard and storage facility, or a fire station and training facility. With the removal of the Flower Mound in the northeastern portion of the Project Site, subsequent grading and ultimate development of the Santa Fe Road extension and commercial services buildings, landscaping, and parking lots, the visual character of that portion of the Project Site would change from one of vacant, natural topography to one with physical development and intense use. This increasing change to the existing visual character would extend to other portions of the Project Site (west end, Tank Farm Road, and north and south sides of Tank Farm Road on the east end) as all five phases of the Project are built out over the course of 25 years. The quiet, serene environment currently enjoyed at the Project Site would give way to sustained increases in vehicle and truck traffic, construction equipment, earthwork stockpiles, man-made structures, and associated lighting and glare. With respect to the area in which the Project Site is located, the issue of aesthetic impacts was reviewed during the adoption of the City’s General Plan and adoption of the AASP. The conclusion was reached within Section 9.0 of the Land Use Element/Circulation Element Update FEIR that urbanization would irreversibly change the visual character of the south end of the City from that of a low density semi-rural area to a more intensely developed, suburban area City 1994). This was classified as a significant, unavoidable impact in the Airport Margarita Area EIR (Page 3A-21). The City Development Plan, however, does include features aimed at reducing impacts to the existing visual character and quality of the Project Site and its surroundings. In general, restoration planting would be conducted throughout the Project Site to maintain consistency with the native plant community structure and composition of the Project Site. More specifically, the removal of the power lines and power poles adjacent to project development frontage along Tank Farm Road and the removal of chain link fencing would serve to enhance the visual quality of the views along Tank Farm Road. A 14-foot wide landscaped median and the installation of a multi-use pathway/bikeway would also serve as enhancements along Tank Farm Road. Santa Fe Road, south of Tank Farm Road, would be re-aligned and tied into Tank Farm Road and include the following elements: The re-aligned segment of Santa Fe Road from San Luis Obispo Creek north to Tank Farm Road would be four lanes with sidewalks on both sides; An arched culvert would be constructed over San Luis Obispo Creek; A multi-use off-street bike path would be constructed along the west side of Santa Fe Road realignment; and An on-street bike path would be installed on both sides of Santa Fe Road. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR New roads would be constructed north of Tank Farm Road, including a one-quarter mile extension of Santa Fe Road continuing north of Tank Farm Road as a two lane road with on- street bike lanes on each side and a 14-foot landscaped median. Over the years, the rural character of the surrounding area has been gradually encroached upon by residential, commercial and industrial development. While the Project would continue this trend, the above features would provide relief to the visual impacts generated by the Project, in addition to the substantial design standards contained in the AASP and the City and County General Plans. Implementation of these design standards would reduce the impact to the existing visually rural character of the Project Site and its surroundings. Therefore, the impact is considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Mitigation Measures AE-2 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall ensure that all development projects are reviewed for consistency with the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan, the Airport Area Specific Plan design guidelines outlined in Section 5.0 Community Design, and the City’s Community Design Guidelines as part of the City Architectural Review process. Residual Impacts The application of design standards, including those listed in the City’s Community Design Guidelines and the County’s General Plan Land Use Ordinance, addressing issues such as building heights, building colors, the use of landscaping and parking lot arrangements, would all serve to minimize the visual character impacts of the City Development Plan. Therefore, the proposed development would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AE.3 The Project would generate a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Development Class II The use of the Project Site for the City Development Plan for urban uses would result in an increase in daytime/nighttime light and glare within the area, including the residences off of Prado Road and Margarita Avenue northwest of the Project Site and residences in the Hidden Hills Mobile Lodge east of the Project Site. These increases would be the result of new lighting at service commercial, business park, and public facility uses, such as a ball field, over the course of the 25-year development schedule on approximately 803,000 square feet of commercial and industrial development. Further, while the types of lighting and their exact locations are not specified at this point, the proposed development would increase the amount of light into adjacent areas, including airport lands, as well as those residential areas identified above. Over the years, the surrounding area has been gradually encroached upon by residential, commercial and industrial development. The proposed development would add to the existing 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR lighting currently generated from these adjacent areas, such as the industrial subdivision to the west of the Project Site and the recreational area (Damon-Garcia Sports Fields) to the northeast. However, certain lighting design features, such as shielding and a restrictive lighting schedule, could be implemented to reduce the lighting and glare impact. Therefore, the potential impact from increased light and glare is considered to be less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Mitigation Measures AE-3 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permits, the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan and lighting operation schedule for review and approval. The lighting plan shall demonstrate that direct views of light sources are shielded from nearby residences. The lighting schedule shall describe the number, location and amounts of lights, and the proposed hours of operation for the entire property. The lighting schedule shall propose the minimum number of lights, level of illumination, and hours of operation allowed by City codes and ordinances, including the City’s Night Sky Ordinance. The approved lighting schedule shall become a required condition of the lease between the property owner and any tenant on the Project Site. Residual Impacts The application of a lighting plan and lighting operation schedule in accordance with City codes and ordinances, including the Night Sky Ordinance, would serve to minimize the adverse affects of new sources of substantial light and glare. Therefore, the proposed development would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.10.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures All of the impacts described above for the City Development Plan would be the same for the County Development Plan. Specifically, the County Development Plan would address degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings (Impact AE.2) in much the same way as the City Development Plan; that is, the County Development Plan includes features aimed at reducing impacts, such as restoration planting, removal of chain link fencing, power lines and power poles along Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road realignment and extension, on-street bike lanes, and a landscaped median on Tank Farm Road. Mitigation measure AE-2 would be the same except under the County Development Plan, consistency should be ensured with the County Airport Land Use Plan, the County Conservation and Open Space Element, the County San Luis Obispo Area Plan, and the County Design Guidelines. Additionally, the application of a lighting plan and lighting operation schedule in accordance with County codes and ordinances would serve to minimize the adverse affects of new sources of substantial light and glare (Impact AE.3) related to the County Development Plan. One of the main differences between the City and County plans is that the County Development Plan includes a wastewater treatment facility (WWTF). A photo simulation was prepared in order to better understand and communicate the potential visual changes associated with the County Development Plan. The photo simulation location was selected to best show a critical viewing point, how the Project would compare to applicable planning policy, and from a 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR viewpoint that would provide a good representation of the overall Project character. See Figure 4.10-13. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AE.4 The wastewater treatment facility would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Development Class II The County Development Plan includes the installation and operation of a wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) on approximately one acre south of Tank Farm Road. Construction of a WWTF would change the visual character of that portion of the Project Site from one of vacant, natural topography to one with physical development and the quiet, serene environment currently enjoyed would give way to increases in vehicle and truck traffic and associated lighting and glare. However, the County Development Plan includes features aimed at reducing impacts in that area of the Project Site, such as restoration planting, removal of chain link fencing, power lines and power poles along Tank Farm Road, on-street bike lanes, and a landscaped median. Over the years, the rural character of the surrounding area has been gradually encroached upon by residential, commercial and industrial development. While the construction of a WWTF would continue this trend, the above features would provide relief to the visual impacts generated by the Project, in addition to the design standards and guidelines contained in the Airport Land Use Plan and the County General Plan. Implementation of these design standards and guidelines would reduce the impact to the existing visually rural character of the Project Site and its surroundings. Therefore, the impact is considered less than significant with mitigation Class II). Mitigation Measures Implement mitigation measure AE-2 following the County design guidelines. Residual Impacts The application of design standards and guidelines, including those listed in the Airport Land Use Plan and the County’s General Plan Land Use Ordinance, addressing issues such as building heights, building colors, the use of landscaping and parking lot arrangements, would all serve to minimize the visual character impacts of the County Development Plan. Therefore, the proposed development would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.10.7 Cumulative Analysis The cumulative section addresses how this Project may contribute to a change in visual quality when viewed with other existing and reasonable future development in the area (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15130). 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources June 2013 4.10-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Public Draft EIR Figure 4.10-13 Key Viewing Location No. 5 from Tank Farm Road near the middle of the Project Site looking southwest - Proposed Source: Google Earth Note: The WWTF is part of the County Development Plan, not the City Development Plan. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR As identified in Chapter 3, Cumulative Scenario and Methodology, projects 2, 3, and 4 (see Table 3-1) are within the same viewshed as the Project. All three cumulative projects are residential projects with two of the projects containing a mixed-use element of commercial and/or office. As with the Project, each of the cumulative projects would contribute to the continuing degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the area, including generating a new source of light or glare that could adversely affect day or nighttime views. However, it should be noted that these three projects would be located in close proximity to existing residential and industrial developments. Further, mitigation measure AE-3 would be implemented to reduce these cumulative impacts. Similar mitigation measures would likely be required for the cumulative projects. As such, the cumulative impacts in aesthetics and visual resources would not be significant. 4.10.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.10.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party AE-1a The Applicant shall ensure that graded areas for development pads that are not built on within two years of creation of the development pads, are temporarily landscaped or otherwise maintained as needed to cover exposed soils and maintain growth of weeds. Weeds shall be controlled to not be unsightly. Check plans Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit County Planning and Building Department AE-1b The Applicant shall ensure that fencing installed throughout the Project Site in order to implement institutional controls for management of the area for wildlife habitat shall contribute to the aesthetic character of the site and vicinity. Prior to issuance of grading permits for sites where fencing is required, the applicant shall submit to the County Department of Planning and Building for review and approval, in consultation with the City of San Luis Obispo, site fencing plans. The plans shall include: fencing types that meet the functional requirements for the intuitional controls; fencing locations; materials and color palette consistent with City of San Luis Obispo design guidelines; and, as needed, complementary landscape to break-up the public view of the fencing. Review and approval of Fencing Plans Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit County Planning and Building Department City Community Development Department 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources December 2013 4.10-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.10.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party AE-2 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall ensure that all development projects are reviewed for consistency with the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan, the Airport Area Specific Plan design guidelines outlined in Section 5.0 Community Design, and the City’s Community Design Guidelines as part of the City Architectural Review process. Check plans Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit City Community Development Department AE-3 Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit, the Applicant shall submit a lighting plan and lighting operation schedule for review and approval. The lighting plan shall demonstrate that direct views of light sources are shielded from nearby residences. The lighting schedule shall describe the number, location and amounts of lights, and the proposed hours of operation for the entire property. The lighting schedule shall propose the minimum number of lights, level of illumination, and hours of operation allowed by City codes and ordinances, including the City’s Night Sky Ordinance. The approved lighting schedule shall become a required condition of the lease between the property owner and any tenant on the Project Site. Check plan Prior to issuance of applicable construction permit City Community Development Department 4.10.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan No specific mitigation measures were identified for the County Development Plan. Impact AE.1 associated with the remediation project would apply. Impacts AE.2 and AE.3 associated with the City Development Plan would be applicable to the County Development Plan except the County standards would apply and the County would be the responsible agency. 4.10.9 References Sierra Club Website on the Nine Sisters, http://www.santalucia.sierraclub.org/ninesis.html#intro San Luis Obispo County (SLOC). 2008a. Santa Margarita Ranch Agricultural Residential Cluster Subdivision Project and Future Development Program Environmental Impact Report. State Clearinghouse No. 2004111112. Prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2009. San Miguel Ranch General Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report. Prepared by LSA Associates. 2010. General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element. May 2010. 2011. Cold Canyon Landfill Expansion Draft Environmental Impact Report. 4.10 Aesthetics and Visual Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.10-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR City of San Luis Obispo (City). 1994. FEIR - Land Use Element/Circulation Element Updates. 2003a. Costco/Froom Ranch Environmental Impact Report. State Clearinghouse No. 2002051036. Prepared by Morro Group, Inc. 2003b. Airport Area and Margarita Area Specific Plans and Related Facilities Master Plans Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Volume II. State Clearinghouse No. 2000051062. Prepared by Jones & Stokes. 2007a. General Plan. 2007b. Community Design Guidelines [amended]. 2009a. Prefumo Creek Commons Project Environmental Impact Report. State Clearinghouse No. 2008021028. Prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. 2009b. Garden Street Terraces Project Environmental Impact Report, Volume I. State Clearinghouse No. 2007071062. Prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. 2013. Municipal Code. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USDA). 1995. Landscape Aesthetics. Agriculture Handbook No. 701. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 1986. USDI Manual 8410, Visual Resource Inventory and Evaluation. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 1980. Visual Impact Assessment for Highway Projects. American Society of Landscape Architects, Washington, D.C. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials This section discusses potential ‘risk of upset’ and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Project. Specifically, ‘risk of upset’ refers to scenarios that could immediately affect public safety in an adverse manner. This section describes those potential impacts to public health and safety posed by the Project. Current and future soil and groundwater contamination issues are also addressed. Potential impacts include fires, explosions, and releases of hazardous materials from activities associated with remediation and future construction and operation of the facilities that would handle hazardous materials. The information in this section outlines the environmental setting, regulatory setting, significance criteria, potential toxic risk scenarios and their significance, and the levels of risk to the public or environment associated with these scenarios. This section also includes an overview of the site’s soil and groundwater contamination issues and how they may impact future development. 4.11.1 Environmental Setting The environmental setting or baseline conditions are associated with existing facilities and site contamination. The Project Site is characterized by several hazards associated with the existing soil and groundwater contamination, as well as the close proximity to the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA) where there is an elevated risk of an aircraft accident. Baseline hazards are summarized in the following sections. 4.11.1.1 Existing Site Contamination From 1910 until the early 1980s, the Project Site stored crude oil transported from the San Joaquin Valley via pipeline. Storage facilities at the Project Site included six large earthen reservoirs, ranging in capacity between 775,000 and 1,350,000 barrels (bbl) [32,550,000 and 56,700,000 gallons], and 21 steel aboveground storage tanks, each with a capacity of 55,000 bbl. The reservoirs were constructed by excavating a circular or elliptical depression, which was then lined with concrete reinforced with wire mesh. The walls were also reinforced concrete, but they were constructed either vertically or integrated into the sloping sides of the depression. The walls and floors of the aboveground storage tanks were constructed of heavy plate steel secured with rivets. The roofs of both the reservoirs and aboveground storage tanks were wood and composition. All together, the Project Site had capacity to store more than 6 million bbl of petroleum. On April 7, 1926, a lightning strike ignited a fire at the Project Site. At that time, 933,577 bbl of oil were stored in the aboveground storage tanks, and another 5,374,927 bbl of oil were stored in the reservoirs. The total inventory was 6,308,504 bbl of various grades of oil. Eyewitnesses reported that a lightning strike simultaneously ignited the vapors in Reservoirs 5, 6, and 7. The 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR power of the resulting explosion registered on the Weather Bureau barograph in downtown San Luis Obispo at 7:35 a.m. A second lightning strike ignited Reservoir 3 sometime between 7:50 and 7:55 a.m. Despite suppression efforts by the facility staff, over the next four days the fire spread to the other reservoirs and to 12 of the existing 15 steel aboveground storage tanks with a combination of burning embers and boil-overs, where the heated oil flowed out of the reservoirs and onto the ground surrounding the tanks. By April 11, 1926, all but a few thousand of the 6 million bbl inventory was released; some of which burnt to coke and spread across the Project Site. Petroleum coke is defined as a black solid residue, obtained mainly in refineries by cracking burning) of residue feedstocks. The burning of the heavy oil during the fire had a similar effect to the refining cracking process, creating the coke. This release is considered responsible for most of the numerous surface occurrences (i.e., expressions) of highly weathered and burned petroleum that cover the ground in topographically low areas of the Project Site. Subsequently, Unocal (now Chevron) resumed operations at the Project Site, including reconstructing ten of the steel aboveground storage tanks (AST’s) and Reservoirs 3, 4, 5, and 6. Reservoirs 2 and 7 were never used again for petroleum storage. In addition to the reservoirs and ASTs utilized for petroleum storage, the facility included a series of pipelines to move oil to and from the Project Site and between the on-site tanks and facilities. Regional pipeline operations were also conducted at the Project Site, primarily from the Northwest Area of the Project Site see Project Description Figure 2-2). Facilities to support pipeline operations included a pumphouse, boilers (for heating crude oil to reduce viscosity) and an associated blow-down area a blow-down area is a normal part of the operation of a steam boiler and a blow-down safely depressurizes the system in the event of an emergency), a petroleum physical properties testing laboratory, and an electrical equipment house. The Northwest Area also included areas for general equipment storage and maintenance, as well as underground storage tanks that contained diesel fuel and gasoline (England, Shahin & Associates 1994). The underground storage tanks were removed in 1987. Other historical activities at the Project Site include the operation of a fire training school in the unpaved eastern portion of the Northwest Area. The school consisted of several simulated sumps, flares, and tanks where students practiced techniques for extinguishing petroleum-fed fires. Off-specification gasoline and diesel fuel were fed to these fixtures from a set of three aboveground storage tanks via a system of buried metal pipes. The four reservoirs repaired after the 1926 fire continued in service for several more decades, but they were progressively decommissioned from the late 1950s through the mid 1970s. Site Characterization Activities Numerous field investigations and related studies have been conducted at the Project Site since the early 1990s. These studies have been used to delineate the presence of both surface Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) and subsurface contamination. In 2002, the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Surface Evaluation, Restoration, and Remediation Team (SERRT), a multi-agency collaborative stakeholder group convened to evaluate the potential impacts to human and ecological health from petroleum and other chemicals at the Site. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR In addition to Chevron (Union Oil pre-2005), SERRT members have included: California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the California Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board CCRWQCB), the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Services Division (SLO County EHS), and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). Some of the more relevant summary studies and technical reports used in the preparation of the present assessment include: Report on Additional Site Assessment, Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California Groundwater Technology, August 25, 1995. Wetland Delineation for Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California EDAW, July 23, 1999. Additional Site Characterization, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California England & Associates, April 1999 (1999a). Petroleum Hydrocarbon Issues For the Proposed Unocal Tank Farm Development and Ecological Preserve, San Luis Obispo, England & Associates, August 1999 (1999b). Background Metals Evaluation, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California, England Geosystem, Inc., February 20, 2003 (2003a). Characterization of Petroleum Fractions in Surface Exposures and Shallow Soil, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California, England Geosystem, Inc., November 26, 2003 (2003b). Soil Gas Monitoring Report September 2002, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California England Geosystem, Inc., January 30, 2003 (2003c). Supplemental Evaluation of Surface Water, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California England Geosystem, Inc., February 20, 2003 (2003d). Additional Sampling of Surface Monitoring Location SW-9, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California Padre Associates, Inc. May 7, 2007 (Padre 2007). An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California Padre Associates, Inc. August 5, 2008 (Padre 2008). Report of Findings, Assessment of Shallow Soils for Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Chlorinated Dibenzofurans, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Padre Associates, Inc. March 2011 (Padre 2011b). First Semi-Annual (1S11) Surface Water Monitoring Report, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California, Padre Associates, April 11, 2011 (Padre 2011c). Second Semi-Annual (2S11) Groundwater Monitoring Report, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California Padre Associates, Inc. October 14, 2011 (Padre 2011d). Report of Findings, Soil Gas Assessment, Former Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California, Padre Associates, Inc., January 2012 (Padre 2012a). 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Report Of Findings, Geologic Evaluation Of Naturally Occurring, Asbestos And Material Durability Assessment, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, December 2012 (Padre 2012b). Investigations of the nature and extent of groundwater and soil contamination at the Site began in 1988. As summarized in the Additional Site Characterization (England & Associates, 1999b), approximately 10 investigations between 1988 and 1999 resulted in the drilling of over 120 soil borings and the installation of 60 groundwater monitoring wells at the Site.1 Summaries of these investigations, as well as the associated data, are provided by England & Associates (1999b). Overall, these investigations identified three principal subsurface crude oil plumes: 1. Northwest plume – underlying the former pipeline operations area in the northwest corner of the Project Site. This area includes several smaller, separate occurrences that underlie former pipelines and steel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) located north and northeast of the field offices. Vertically, petroleum in this area is limited to a depth of approximately 25 feet, but mostly occurs in the 10- to 15-foot depth range. 2. Northeast plume – beneath former Reservoir 4. Petroleum-impacted soil and bedrock were found to extend from the ground surface to depths of up to 50 feet in the eastern part of the former reservoir. 3. Southern plume – large occurrence that underlies much of the Project Site south of Tank Farm Road. Borings drilled within the area indicate that impacted soil occurs primarily in the 5- to 25-foot depth range. Locally, impacted soil extends as deep as 50 feet below Reservoirs 2 and 3. Studies conducted following those summarized by England and Associates (1999b) that characterized the nature and extent of the contamination at the Project Site are summarized below. Additional Site Characterization, England & Associates, April 1999. Based on the findings to date, England & Associates conducted its Additional Site Characterization in 1999(b). This investigation focused on refining the delineation of crude oil in the subsurface, characterizing the physiochemical nature of crude oil in surface soils and at depth, and examining areas of the Project Site not used exclusively for petroleum storage (e.g., boiler blow-down pond, fire school area, cutting shed, pump house) for other potential contaminants of concern. Specific work included drilling 16 borings to better delineate the subsurface plumes relative to Project Site property lines, 42 borings to better delineate the extent of crude oil plumes, five borings to examine contamination in the area of the boiler blow-down pond, and 58 shallow soil samples (0.5 to 2.5 feet below ground surface (bgs)) to determine concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) and total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH), as well as other chemicals of potential concern (COPCs), such as metals, 1. Investigators included Brown & Caldwell, Dames & Moore, Earth Systems Environmental, England & Associates, Ground water Technology, and Unocal. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the vicinity of the Northwest operations area. Sampling also focused on wetland and riparian areas, including surface tars, soils, sediments, and surface waters, to examine the nature and extent of contamination in habitat areas of likely ecological interest. Findings included: Hydrocarbons detected below 5 feet are dominated by compounds in the C10-C25 range 60%; the remaining 40% composed of C25-C40 hydrocarbons); There is a limited contribution of BTEX constituents to the crude oil (i.e., <0.5 mg/kg wet weight in 3 of 17 samples); There are no significant concentrations of VOCs (<0.092 mg/kg wet weight in 7 of 39 samples) or PCBs (< 0.09 mg/kg wet weight Aroclor 1254 in 6 of 38 samples) in soil or tar samples; PAH concentrations generally below 1 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg wet weight); Of the 17 CAM (California Administrative Manual) metals, only arsenic and lead were detected in concentrations significantly above background concentrations; and Movement of crude oil in the subsurface has reached its maximum limit of travel. In addition, this report characterized the surface hydrocarbon expressions at the Project Site. The expressions are defined as remnants of the crude oil deposited on the land surface as a result of the 1926 fire and are present in the form of surficial crude oil. These expressions occur in a variety of forms including: (1) solid, vesicular material similar in appearance and consistency to volcanic rock (green areas on Figure 2-6); (2) pliable non-flowing weathered crude (blue areas on Figure 2-6); (3) pliable with evidence of recent plastic flow (purple areas on figure 2-6); and (4) liquid petroleum which is capable of creating sheen in surface water (red areas on Figure 2-6). Detailed results are provided in the April 1999 report. Former Boiler Blow-Down Area Investigation. England & Associates, January 1999. In conjunction with the Additional Site Characterization, England & Associates investigated the former boiler blowdown area and documented the findings in a separate report (1999a). The primary objective of the investigation was to determine whether discharges of the boiler blow- down water adversely impacted groundwater quality. Boiler-related operations were conducted in the operations area of the Site, and cooled blow-down water discharged to a small pond 250 feet east of the boiler in the southwest corner of the northwest marsh (in the vicinity of B-33, see Figure 2-6). The investigation involved drilling five borings, collecting soil samples from a variety of depths (including 0.5, 2.5, and 5 feet), and completing the borings as ether temporary piezometers or permanent groundwater wells. Soil samples contained detectable concentrations of TPH, primarily at depths less than 15 feet, but contained no detectable BTEX or PAHs. The authors determined that the only metal exceeding background was zinc, and that this occurred in only one sample. In groundwater, TPH but not PAHs or BTEX was detected. A variety of metals were detected in groundwater. Overall, the report concluded that soil and groundwater beneath the boiler blow-down pond may have been impacted by discharged boiler water, but that the area of impact is generally limited to the former pond area itself. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Supplemental Site Characterization, England Geosystem Inc., October 2001. England Geosystem, Inc. (formerly England & Associates) performed a Supplemental Site Characterization (England Geosystem, Inc., 2001) to address data gaps at the Site. Specifically, the investigation was designed to: Characterize the vertical and localized horizontal direction of groundwater flow in areas of hydrocarbon seepage (such as Reservoir 7 and adjacent to Reservoir 2); Measure chemical and physical properties of light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) in wells; Assess vertical variations in the occurrence and chemistry of residual liquid-phase petroleum hydrocarbons in soil; Characterize the composition and flux of soil gas in petroleum-impacted areas of the Site under consideration for future development; Assess the potential mobility of the liquid-phase petroleum; and Measure the activity of natural attenuation processes. England Geosystem, Inc.’s 2001 report details the findings of this investigation. Briefly, it was determined that, while it was unlikely that vertical groundwater gradients were responsible for seepage observed in the vicinity of Reservoir 2, the vertical groundwater gradient contribution to seepages in Reservoir 7 could not be determined. LNAPL detected in wells at the Site exhibited low density and high viscosity, and had chemical and physical properties consistent with San Joaquin Valley crude oil. England Geosystem, Inc observed no apparent relationships between TPH composition, BTEX composition, or PAH composition with sample depth. Finally, the low density and high viscosity of average LNAPL at the Site makes it 750 times less mobile than water; in addition, the low permeabilities/transmissivities measured in the subsurface soils impede the lateral movement of LNAPL. Reservoir Bottom Hydrocarbon Seepage Study Report. England Geosystem Inc., November 2002. In 2002, England Geosystem, Inc. performed a study to identify the processes responsible for the production of hydrocarbon sheen in Reservoirs 5 and 7 at the Site. Hypotheses evaluated included (1) the development of sheen when water contacted oil residue present in reservoir bottoms, and (2) rising groundwater or density inversion forcing LNAPL to the surface. Based on observed surface water/groundwater relationships and the accumulation of LNAPL, it was concluded that rising groundwater is a significant contributor to the hydrocarbon seeps in Reservoirs 5 and 7 and that seepage appears to be related to shallow seasonally fluctuating groundwater and LNAPL, as well as discontinuities in the formation underlying the reservoirs England Geosystem, Inc, 2002). Analysis for Pesticides and Herbicides, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Earth Systems Pacific, July 2002. Earth Systems Pacific conducted surface sampling at the Site in May 2002 to evaluate the presence of pesticides and herbicides in soils. Twenty-three surface soil samples, from locations scattered over the entire Site, were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides and chlorinated/phenoxy acid herbicides. No organochlorine pesticides or chlorinated/phenoxy acid 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR herbicides were detected, with detection limits ranging from 0.002 to 1.5 mg/kg wet weight and 0.02 to 20 mg/kg wet weight, respectively (Earth Systems Pacific, 2002a). Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2002, Monitoring and Reporting Program 93-120 – Unocal Tank Farm. Earth Systems Pacific, October 2002. Ongoing groundwater and surface water monitoring is conducted at the Site, pursuant to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) 93-120 (Earth Systems Pacific, 2002b). The MRP (initiated in 1993), calls for semi-annual groundwater monitoring and currently includes 26 groundwater monitoring wells, five off-site supply wells, and 10 surface water locations analyzed for TPH (purgeable [C4-C10 compounds] and extractable [>C10 compounds]) and BTEX. When the Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA) activities were initiated, the most recent semi-annual groundwater monitoring had occurred in September 2002. At that time, only the groundwater and off-site supply wells were sampled. The groundwater gradient was determined to be to the west- southwest, at an average slope of 0.007. Purgeable TPH was detected in only one of the four monitoring wells analyzed. Extractable TPH was detected in 16 of 24 wells sampled and in two of the five supply wells. However, following silica gel cleanup, extractable TPH was detected in only two monitoring wells and in no off-site supply wells. BTEX constituents were detected in only one monitoring well and in no off-site supply wells (Earth Systems Pacific, 2002b). 2010 Dioxin Sampling A collaborative evaluation of dioxin (Attachment 8 of the 2004 Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA), and Attachment 3 of the updated 2013 HHRA) during the SERRT process concluded that any dioxins originally sourced from the 1926 fire and still present at the Site would be indistinguishable from levels expected to be associated with local ambient sources. Therefore, dioxin was not evaluated as a site-related COPC in the 2004 HHRA. Comments provided during the CEQA peer review process noted that the 1926 fire may have produced dioxins that have not been adequately characterized by previous studies, and suggested that dioxin generated by the fire would be distinguishable from other anthropogenic sources (i.e. nearby roads, the airport, or local forest fires). To respond to stakeholder concerns, Padre, at the direction of Chevron and following a work plan reviewed by the SERRT (Padre 2010), conducted additional on-site and background (i.e., off-site) shallow soil sampling in August 2010 to characterize on-site dioxin and furan concentrations and to determine whether dioxins generated by the 1926 fire are present on-site at concentrations greater than those in local background soils (Padre 2011b; included as Attachment 3). A total of 10 on-site drill holes were advanced, with samples collected at three depths: 0-6 inches, 5 feet and 10 ft bgs. Ten off-site reference samples also were collected from surface soil (0-6 inches). All soil samples were analyzed for dioxins and furans (USEPA method 8290/High-resolution), percent moisture, and total organic carbon content (TOC). A Tier IV data validation was conducted, concluding that qualified data were usable for the project objectives. Dioxin toxic equivalents (TEQs) at the Site ranged from non-detect to 0.023 g/kg-dry weight at the Site. As discussed further in the site evaluation, the evaluation of supplemental dioxin data concluded that “the fire in 1926 did not generate significant quantities of dioxins” (Geosyntec 2010). Soil Characterization Summary As discussed above, soil samples were collected extensively at various Site locations from 1988 through 2003, and resulted in the collection of over 350 soil samples from within 0-10 ft bgs (see 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-1). Most of these have been analyzed for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including BTEX, and other petroleum hydrocarbon constituents such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), as well as for metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and pesticides. As illustrated in Figure 2-6, petroleum hydrocarbons exceeding 1,000 mg/kg in soil >5 feet bgs occurs across a significant portion of the Site. Of the 278 samples analyzed for TPH in soil collected from up to 10 ft bgs, motor oil range petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-m; detected in 159 samples at concentrations ranging from 12.5 to 35,000 mg/kg) and diesel range petroleum (TPH-d; detected in 149 samples at concentrations ranging from 12.5 to 58,000 mg/kg) were most frequently detected. Gasoline range TPH (TPH- g) was analyzed in 71 of the samples, and detected only 20 times at concentrations ranging from 12.5 to 2,500 mg/kg. Inorganics were detected in Site samples, with the most frequently detected arsenic (ranging from 1.4 to 388 mg/kg, with the highest detections occurring in the former Northwest Operations Area), barium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, vanadium and zinc. Other chemical detected in soil/sediment at the Project Site include various semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) including PAHs, and less frequently the PCB Aroclor 1254 as well as VOCs including BTEX. Surface Hydrocarbon Expressions Some of the crude oil that was released during the 1926 fire is present today in the form of surface crude oil deposits. The distribution of the various types of “surface hydrocarbon expressions” is illustrated in Project Description Figure 2-6. These surface hydrocarbon expressions range from solid material similar in appearance to volcanic rock and/or asphalt shown in green), to viscous liquid petroleum, which has been observed to create a sheen in nearby surface water (shown in red). The blue and green surface expressions shown in Figure 2-6 are pliable, highly weathered crude oil with the purple showing evidence of “recent plastic flow”. With respect to the more tar-like hydrocarbon expressions, the SERRT agreed that while these areas are of concern because they may include elevated concentrations of PAHs (specifically the more fluid/tar-like/less weathered blue and purple areas), as well as create physical hazards to small animals during periods of warm weather, they represent a unique exposure scenario. Specifically, the most likely human exposure at the Site would be analogous to coming into contact with tacky tar at the beach and having it adhere to bare feet, hands or other exposed skin primarily dermal exposure). Soil Vapor Characterizations In 1992 and 2002, soil vapor monitoring studies were conducted by England Geosystem to determine if the inhalation pathway of exposure poses a human health concern (report included as Attachment 3 of the 2004 Baseline HHRA). Sampling locations including the LNAPL areas identified around the Northwest Operations and Reservoir 4 areas. Eighteen soil gas samples were collected in September 2002 and analyzed for the presence of fixed gases and C1 to C5 hydrocarbons. Methane was the predominant gas found in soil gas monitoring and accounted for 93% of the C1 to C5 hydrocarbons found, followed by butane, propane, pentane, and ethane isomers. Some low levels of benzene were also detected in soil gas samples across the Site, and did not appear to be associated with any one area. As detailed in Section 4.1.4 of the 2004 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-1 Soil Sampling Locations Source: AVOCET, 2007. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Baseline HHRA, the SERRT agreed that the inhalation of VOCs from soil was not a likely potential source of human exposure given future land uses (recreational and commercial uses with residential deed restriction) and was not assessed in the risk assessment. During the CEQA review process, additional soil gas sampling was recommended for areas of the Site identified for development. To address this request, Padre, at the direction of Chevron and following a work plan reviewed by the SERRT (Padre 2011a), undertook supplemental soil gas sampling at the Site to characterize the nature and extent of soil gas conditions and to provide adequate data for an evaluation of potential human health risks from subsurface vapor intrusion associated with soil and groundwater impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons (Padre 2012, included as Attachment 4). This assessment included the construction of 29 soil gas probes within the former Northwest Operations and Reservoir 4 areas, within the approximate footprints of the documented BTEX and LNAPL plumes in the Northwest Operations Area as follows and shown in Figure 4.11-2: two sub-slab probes (SV1 and SV2) immediately below the concrete slab foundation of an existing building; four probes (SG1 through SG4) below the asphalt parking surface surrounding building 1, and 10 probes (SG5 through SG14) in areas with exposed soil in the Northwest Operations Area; and 13 probes (SG15 through SG27) in areas with exposed topsoil within the footprint of the documented LNAPL plume in the Reservoir 4 area. Soil gas probes SG1 through SG27 were constructed at depths of approximately 5.5 ft bgs; additional soil gas probes were nested with probes SG15, SG17 and SG25 at depths of approximately 15 ft bgs, the only locations where groundwater was not encountered. Sub-slab vapor probes (SV1 and SV2) were installed on August 25, 2011, with samples collected on August 25 and December 2, 2011. Soil gas sampling across the rest of the Site, which resulted in the collection of 30 samples, was conducted from October 18 to 21, 2011. All samples were collected into 100% laboratory-certified clean 1-liter SUMMA canisters and submitted to H&P mobile laboratory on-site for chemical analyses for the full suite of VOCs, TPHv, and speciated TPHv via TO-15, as well as fixed gases (ASTM 1496), and hydrogen sulfide (hand-held Jerome 631X meter). In addition, two soil samples (SG14-5’ and SG15-5’) were collected and submitted to PTS Laboratories, Inc. for analysis of vapor transport properties. Oxygen levels in the sub-slab samples ranged from 8.7-11% in SV1 to 17-19% in SV2; carbon dioxide ranged from 7.3-8.5% in SV1 and 1.1-2.2% in SV2, and no methane was detected. As noted by Padre (2012), only ethylbenzene in sub-slab vapor exceeded screening levels (based on residential California Human Health Screening Levels [CHHSLs] and/or RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels [ESLs]), with 120 g/m3 detected in SV2 collected during the August 2011 sampling event; it was not detected in samples during the December 2011 event. Generally only low levels of aliphatic (C5-C8 and C9-C12) and aromatic (C6-C8 and C9-C10) TPHv were present in sub-slab vapor samples, although concentrations of TPHv C9-C12 aliphatics and C6-C8 aromatics exceeded 1,000 g/m3 at SV1 and SV2, respectively, during the August 2011 sampling event; however these analytes were not detected above analytical reporting limits or screening levels during the December 2011 sampling event. Fixed gases exhibited wide variability in the soil gas samples. In the Northwest Operations Area, oxygen levels ranged from 4.4-22%, carbon dioxide from not detected (<0.2%) to 11%, and methane from not detected (<10 parts per million volume [ppmv]) to 200,000 ppmv. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-2 Soil Gas Sampling Locations Source: AVOCET, 2007. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The ranges fixed gas levels are similar in the Reservoir 4 area: oxygen levels ranged from 5- 21%, carbon dioxide from not detected (<0.2%) to 10%, and methane from not detected (<10 ppmv) to 210,000 ppmv. Benzene and toluene VOCs were detected in all soil gas samples analyzed, with additional detections of acetone, carbon disulfide, chloroform, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, and xylenes. As noted by Padre (2012), only benzene detections ranging from 7.8 to 51,000 g/m3) and ethylbenzene (23 to 8,900 g/m3) were detected at concentrations above residential shallow soil gas CHHSLs and/or ESLs. TPHv aromatics (either carbon range) were detected in 86 percent of the samples collected from the Northwest Operations Area and 56 percent of the samples collected from the Reservoir 4 area. Maximum concentrations of TPHv aromatics were detected in soil gas samples in the Northwest Operations Area collected from probes SG7, SG10 and SG11 (320,000 g/m3, 84,000 g/m3, and 33,000 g/m3, respectively). TPHv aliphatics (either carbon range) were detected in all soil gas samples collected at the Site except SG1-5.5, with the highest concentrations detected in samples collected from the Northwest Operations Area (C5-C8 maximum of 13,000,000 g/m3). Nearly all of the maximum soil gas detections within the Reservoir 4 area, where deeper samples could be collected, occurred in the shallow samples Surface Water Characterizations Surface water assessments have been conducted at the Site since 1995, with sampling locations shown in 4.11-3. Historically, surface water samples have been collected from twenty locations around the Site and chemically analyzed for at least one of the following chemical groups: TPH, VOCs including BTEX, PAHs, and inorganics, with TPH, toluene, xylenes and various inorganics detected. A 2003 evaluation of ten surface water samples collected from the Site concluded that overall the surface water samples appeared to have low levels of organic material measurable as C10-C40 TPH), but that the lack of detectable aliphatic/aromatic material, detectable PAHs, and the removal of this organic material by silica gel coupled with the mass spectral analysis, site observations, and field observations of water color and clarity “suggest that the petroleum is unlikely to be a major source of the organic material” (AGSI 2003a). However, no conclusive determination regarding the TPH source could be made for two of the three samples for which the aliphatic/aromatic and/or spectral analyses were conducted. Currently, semi-annual monitoring at ten locations on and around the Site (SW-1 through SW- 10) is conducted by Padre; samples collected during these semi-annual events are analyzed for extractable” TPH (e.g., petroleum hydrocarbons in the C10-C40 range) and, if TPH is detected, then the surface water sample is pre-treated with a silica gel clean-up and re-analyzed for the TPH C10-C40. Since March 2006, TPH has been detected in samples from all ten sampling locations ranging from 0.055 mg/L to 6.4 mg/L prior to silica gel clean-up, but is rarely detected following silica gel clean-up (Padre 2011c). Groundwater Characterizations Since 1988, groundwater monitoring activities have resulted in the construction of a network of up to 30 wells at the Site (Figure 4.11-3). Historically, groundwater samples were analyzed for at least one of the following chemical groups: TPH, VOCs including BTEX, PAHs, and inorganics. The most frequently detected chemicals at the Site were TPH and BTEX. For a period of time approximately 1999 to 2004), groundwater samples analyses included a re-analysis of TPH C10-C40 following silica gel clean-up, with the TPH removed from nearly all samples, although detections frequently remained in samples collected from monitoring wells SLOW-12 and 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR SLOW-18 in the Northwest Operations Area (see Padre 2011d, included as Attachment 6). Less frequent detections of arsenic, barium, molybdenum, nickel, and vanadium, sec-butylbenzene, isopropylbenzene, MTBE, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzne, and some PAHs were observed in some of the historic groundwater samples. Currently, wells are monitored semi-annually with all samples analyzed for TPH C10-C40 (with no silica gel clean-up comparison is conducted); a subset of samples are analyzed for TPH-g and BTEX. During the most recently reported monitoring event (September 2011), the depth to groundwater ranged from 5.75 feet (MW-39) to 21.51 feet (MW-46) below the top of the casings, with groundwater calculated to flow generally toward the southwest (Padre 2011d). Only TPH (C10-C40) was detected above laboratory reporting limits, with detections in nine of the 24 groundwater samples analyzed ranging from 530 g/L (SLOW-12) to 3,600 g/L SLOW-18). The most frequent and highest detections of TPH are in samples collected from the Northwest Operations Area. As described in Section 4.11.1.1 above, , a unique set of conditions in the Northwest Operations Area resulted in the LNAPL in the saturated zone containing a lighter hydrocarbon range (C5-C20 including benzene) which co-occurs with, and is dissolved in, the heavier oil. Thus, the detections of TPH in groundwater samples collected from this area likely reflect a combination of free- (LNAPL) and dissolved-phase impacts. Naturally Occurring Asbestos Padre (2012b) prepared a Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) assessment and material durability assessment (Material Assessment) to support the development of the engineering analysis and asbestos related monitoring plans associated with the proposed Project. The NOA investigation and Material Durability Assessment was completed in the vicinity of the Former Quarry Area of the former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Facility. Based on a review of available geologic maps, soil maps and other published data, and observations of surfical geology and rock cores collected from drill holes at the Project Site, bedrock material at the site is likely ultramafic in nature and contains zones of secondary mineralization (aphanitic texture and acicular habit) of possible serpentine and amphibole minerals. Fibrous and/or asbestiform minerals were not observed. Asbestos was not indicated above the analytical detection limit of 0.25% in any of the rock or soil samples submitted for microscopic analysis by CARB Method 435. However, the microscopic analyses indicated that several rock core samples contained trace concentrations of chrysotile (serpentinite) asbestos but could not be quantified due to the method quantification criteria. The findings of the microscopic analyses and field observations will be utilized in the development of a dust mitigation plan associated with proposed future grading activities at the Project Site. Four rock core samples were submitted for physical testing including durability index, abrasion resistance, specific gravity and absorption. The results of the tests are compiled in the report prepared by NV5 – BTC Labs and will be utilized to determine suitability for use in planned restoration activities at the Project Site. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-3 Surface and Ground Water Sampling Locations Source: AVOCET, 2007. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Off-site Contamination There are three areas of off-site, or potential off-site contamination. Under the proposed Project no cleanup activities are proposed. The following summarizes the off-site contamination issues and proposed actions under the proposed Project: 1) There is BTEX in the groundwater that originates under the Northwest Operations Area that is slowly moving west. Chevron proposes to leave BTEX in place but obtain a Land Use Covenant/Deed Restriction to keep the contamination from being exposed. Chevron would also continue to monitor the movement of this groundwater plume. There is currently no threat to humans or wildlife from this off-site contamination. 2) An area off-site on the Betita property has TPH/LNAPL contamination. Chevron proposes to leave TPH/LNAPL in place but obtain a Land Use Covenant/Deed Restriction to keep the contamination from being exposed. There is currently no threat to humans or wildlife from this off-site contamination. 3) In 1926 a burning stream of oil flowed along San Luis Obispo Creek that extended from the Unocal Tank Farm Road Facility to Avila Beach. There is a potential for residual crude oil and combustion byproducts in and along San Luis Obispo Creek. However, to date, no evidence has been found of any existing contamination in the creek. It is possible that almost a century of stream flow and floods have removed any residual contamination. No action is proposed at this time to address potential residual contamination from the 1926 spill and fire. 4.11.1.2 Peer Review of Human and Ecological Risk An in-depth peer review of the Applicant prepared documents that address human and ecological risk of the Project was conducted as part of this EIR. The following five reports were reviewed and evaluated: Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) for the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, ratified May 25, 2004 Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA), ratified May 25, 2004 Risk Management Study (RMS), ratified December 12, 2005 Feasibility Study (FS), dated March 15, 2007 Remedial Action Plan (RAP), dated December 18, 2007 Additionally, many other Project-related reports and descriptions were reviewed in order to place the above-referenced reports in the proper context (e.g., the site assessment reports summarized in Section 4.11.1). Therefore, the review involved the evaluation of more than 3,000 pages of highly technical information. Overall, these three reports are very well organized, well written, and very well documented. All three reports are excellent and the findings and recommendations are supported by the technical documentation provided. They appear to be complete, technically accurate, and their preparation has followed correct Cal/EPA DTSC and U.S. EPA procedures and protocols. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR However, despite this overall conclusion, a few discrepancies in the site characterization and resultant HHRA were noted that required further sampling and analysis. This is understandable given that sampling, analysis, and the HHRA were prepared over five years ago and some methodologies have changed in that period. As a result, additional assessments were conducted to evaluate dioxins in soil and Site soil gas, as summarized in Section 4.11.1 and an updated HHRA prepared (see Section 4.11.3). The intent of our review was not supplant our opinions for those of the pERA authors or the Ecological Risk Working Group (ERWG) but rather to offer a fresh perspective on whether the risk management alternatives selected were supported by the data. Towards this, it is believed that if the pERA is soundly based, the RMS is soundly based. The obverse is also true; if the pERA lacks a sound basis, the RMS becomes suspect. It is not our intent to recommend different or alternative risk management (remedial) options; we have limited our opinions in this matter to pointing out data gaps, inconsistencies, and areas for further documentation in the pERA and a general recommendation that the risk management approach as outlined in the RMS be revisited. We found that these two reports are well organized and well written. While they generally appear to be complete, are mostly technically accurate, and their preparation has generally followed Cal/EPA DTSC and U.S. EPA procedures and protocols, some aspects of the pERA do not follow DTSC or EPA protocol and thus several questions remain about the extent and scope of the pERA. Both reports, although well written, contain findings and recommendations that are not entirely supported by the technical documentation provided. Because the Risk Management Study (RMS) relies almost entirely on the findings of the pERA, errors in data gathering and interpretation in the pERA necessarily will impact the recommendations found in the RMS. Therefore, these two reports were reviewed and evaluated together. And, due to this interlinking, comments about the pERA also applied to the RMS. Human Health Risk Assessment for the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, ratified May 25, 2004. The 2004 baseline human health risk assessment (HHRA) prepared by McDaniel Lambert, Inc. evaluated potential human health risks at the Project Site using current U.S. EPA and CalEPA methodologies. Risks determined in the HHRA are driven by the presence of arsenic, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzo(a)pyrene in soil. As part of our review, we constructed a model to calculate risks and hazards to the off-site resident under Scenario 1 (post-remediation). This spreadsheet was used to confirm the results reported in the HHRA and to evaluate the validity of certain assumptions made, as well as test the effects of alternative values on resulting risks and hazards. Specific points of this review are below. Site Characterization The characterization of the site, as presented in the HHRA, seems appropriate and complete. It is notable and reasonable that Reservoirs 5 and 7 (where hydrocarbon sheen has been observed) and all areas of surface hydrocarbon expression are excluded from the risk assessment. Remedial action objectives for these locations are designed to keep potential receptors from contacting 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR liquid hydrocarbons through the preferred remedy (capping, deed restrictions, long-term monitoring, etc.). Chemicals of Potential Concern An extensive database including results of soil and surface water sampling activities to date is included in the HHRA. The HHRA refers to soil gas sampling data in Attachment 13, but it was not included. A background metals evaluation was conducted such that cumulative probability plots were used to estimate threshold values between anomalous and background populations, and to identify apparent data distributions and outliers. In this way, background concentrations of metals were developed based on the distribution of metals in the soil, on and in the vicinity of the Site. Metals reported below these derived background levels were excluded from the risk assessment. In the absence of site-specific background metals concentrations, this approach seems appropriate. Two scenarios are evaluated in the HHRA: Scenario 1 is based on contaminant data from the “whole site” (excluding Reservoirs 5 and 7 and all surface hydrocarbon expressions as noted above). Scenario 2 is considered a post-remediation scenario in which metals data from the Northwest Operations Area are excluded. Arsenic Arsenic reported in shallow soil (down to about 2 feet below ground surface) at the Northwest Operations Area is the key substance that drives the risk assessment under Scenario 1. Since remedial action objectives at this location are designed to keep potential receptors from contacting this soil (through the preferred remedy of constructing a minimum 4 foot thick soil cap, deed restrictions, etc.), arsenic is not assessed under Scenario 2, which is an appropriate approach. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Total petroleum hydrocarbons, as sampled and analyzed, are comprised of several fractions: aliphatic, aromatic and NSO/asphaltene 2. In the HHRA, the NSO/asphaltene fraction is not evaluated for health risk due to inadequate human toxicity information in the literature. Additionally, the C4-C10 fraction of TPH in soil is excluded because this fraction represents less than 5% of total TPH in soil to 10 feet below ground surface and it was concluded that the TPH distribution in soils, sediment and surface tars at the site is adequately represented by analysis of TPH in the C10-C40 range. These assumptions may not be appropriate as the toxicity of a C4- C10 fraction is usually significantly greater than the toxicity of a C10-C40 range. Suitable surrogates should be used to assess the risk and hazard posed by the C4-C10 fraction. It appears that in order to assess the toxicity of TPH, further testing was conducted to quantify the aliphatic and aromatic fractions. Soil samples to 10’ bgs were assessed and it was determined 2 NSO: nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR that the aliphatic fraction represents 21.2 to 51.3% of total TPH (median 33.6%) and the aromatic fraction represents 7.9 to 35.3% of total TPH (median 17.3%). In the risk assessment, the median percentage values were used to estimate soil concentrations of aliphatic and aromatic TPH. However, since TPH is the risk driver in the chronic hazard analysis, the median values may not be health protective, and further analysis is warranted using an appropriately-derived UCL of the arithmetic mean as EPCs. Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins PCDDs/PCDFs were not evaluated in the 2004 HHRA because, as the 2004 HHRA claimed, soil sampling and analysis for dioxins at this site would be difficult to interpret. The 2004 HHRA claimed that laboratory analysis would not be able to distinguish between residual dioxin from the 1926 fire and dioxin from other sources, such as vehicle exhaust, that may have been deposited at the site since the fire. According to the 2004 HHRA (page 16) “Based on current knowledge and assumptions, the SERRT concluded that any dioxins originally sourced from the 1926 fire and still present at the site would be indistinguishable from the expected levels associated with local ambient sources.” While reluctant to disagree with the distinguished and highly experienced members of the SERRT, we nevertheless found that the reason for not analyzing for dioxins was suspect That a COPC at this site – or any site - should be removed from consideration due to an alleged difficulty in interpreting the data undermines the completeness of the HHRA and the pERA. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans are highly toxic to human and ecological receptors, are bioaccumulated, and are highly persistent in the environment. They are known to be produced during uncontrolled petroleum fires. If, as the HHRA claimed, any dioxins/furans produced from the 1926 fire are indeed “indistinguishable” from background levels coming from other anthropogenic sources, a sampling and analysis plan could easily be designed and implemented to support that contention. Sampling soil in areas known to have been impacted by the fire, along with nearby areas known to not have been impacted by the fire, would establish the appropriateness of removing PCDDs/PCDFs as COPC. We recommended that additional soil sampling and analysis be conducted for PCDDs/PCDFs to ensure that levels are indeed “indistinguishable” from background levels coming from other anthropogenic sources and thus do not pose a significant incremental or cumulative risk to human or ecological receptors. A dioxin sampling was conducted in 2010 to address this issue and the HHRA was updated to evaluate potential dioxin risk. Benzene Low levels of benzene were reported in soil vapor monitoring activities although this could not be verified as the soil gas sampling data in Attachment 13 was not included in the 2004 HHRA. Additionally, benzene was detected in 3% of the surface and subsurface soil samples analyzed for benzene. The 2004 HHRA indicates that the ERWG/HHWG3 concluded that there is low or negligible risk from inhalation of volatile hydrocarbons in soil, including BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene), and accordingly recommended that the vapor/inhalation exposure pathway need not be addressed. 3 Ecological Risk Work Group and Human Health Risk Assessment Work Group 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR In reviewing the 2004 HHRA Work Plan, Dr. Jim Carlisle of OEHHA conducted a benzene assessment using the Johnson-Ettinger vapor intrusion model to evaluate the potential for exposure due to vapor intrusion of benzene from soil gas into indoor air. Dr. Carlisle’s modeling results show risks due to inhalation of benzene vapors intruding into indoor airspace to be on the order of 4 - 9 E-08, We calculated total risks to the off-site resident due to inhalation of both vapors and particulates in outdoor air to be about 9.6E-09. Given the reportedly low levels of benzene in soil vapor on- site and the low frequency of soil samples containing benzene, elimination of vapor inhalation as an exposure pathway appears supported. Dry versus wet sampling results. The issue of when to use “dry weight” or “wet weight” results for COCs when calculating an Exposure Point Concentration (EPC) was discussed in the 2004 HHRA. Section 2.1.1 Data Characterization (p.14) states that for the pERA BBL converted “wet weight” soil concentrations to “dry weight” concentrations to standardize the data for use in risk assessment. The wet-to-dry weight conversion was accomplished using a conversion factor of 0.799. The conversion factor was developed by England Geosystem based on moisture data available from near the Site along Tank Farm Road. However, on page 21 of the 2004 HHRA, it indicates that “wet weight” values were used in the calculation of the EPC for the human health risk assessment: "Data were converted back to wet-weight concentrations (by multiplying results by 0.799), as human health risk assessments typically rely on wet weight concentrations estimation." We found that it was appropriate to convert soil data wet results to dry results for the pERA and would also have been appropriate to use the dry weight values in the HHRA. However, since the conversion value was ~0.8, we found that, based upon its experience, the use of wet weight or dry weight values in a HHRA does not make a significant difference in the calculation of the EPC or in the risks/hazards posed. Exposure Point Concentrations In the 2004 HHRA, the 95%UCL of the arithmetic mean of data distributions of COPCs were used as the exposure point concentrations in the risk assessment. For soil, the EPCs were based on wet-weight soil and sediment concentrations, 0-10’ bgs (excluding samples from Reservoirs 5 and 7 and surface expressions, as noted previously) using USEPA’s ProUCL statistical analysis program. In our review, the most recent methodology for calculating an UCL for use as an EPC – the ProUCL method - was used. (It is acknowledged that the EPA ProUCL method was not available to the authors of the HHRA at the time the 2004 HHRA was prepared.) We used this method to evaluate the EPCs chosen for arsenic and total TPH in soil, using the analytical data presented in the HHRA. In order to accomplish this, all the data printed in the HHRA were manipulated and sorted such that all arsenic and all TPH data were isolated. The data for each, including non-detects, was entered into ProUCL and the statistical analyses were performed. The results for UCLs obtained in our review support the values of the EPCs for arsenic and TPH used in the HHRA. In our review, the ProUCL program recommended a UCL to use for arsenic at 12.4 mg/kg, compared to the value used in the HHRA of 12.0 mg/kg. For TPH, ProUCL 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR calculated the UCL to be 2258 mg/kg while the HHRA used 2871 mg/kg. Thus, we can confirm that, for at least arsenic and TPH, the HHRA used the appropriate EPCs. Exposure Assessment The Reasonable Maximum Exposure (RME) approach was used in the HHRA, as per US EPA and CalEPA guidance. The RME approach is designed to provide a conservative exposure case that is within the range of possible exposures. The following potentially exposed populations were evaluated in the HHRA: Off-site resident (adult and child) Recreational open space user (adult and child) Business park employee Intrusive construction worker The following potential exposure pathways were evaluated in the HHRA: Inhalation of dust from soil Soil ingestion Dermal contact with soil Incidental ingestion of surface water Dermal contact with surface water Elimination of the groundwater exposure pathway was appropriate, in our view, due to the poor quality of the shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the former tank farm. The shallow groundwater does not meet drinking water standards, and is thus not likely to be used now or in the future as a drinking water source. It should be noted that the site has deeper groundwater that does meet drinking water standards, and has not been affected by the site contamination. This is discussed further in the Water Resources Section (Section 4.5). Another unlikely exposure pathway, yet one that should be discussed nonetheless, is the potential for exposure through ingestion of beef from cattle grazing on-site. For the most part, appropriate exposure assumptions and exposure algorithms were used although the following discussion is noteworthy: The off-site resident and the recreational open space user are assumed to use the site in the same manner (same exposure pathways and exposure assumptions), with the exception of the inhalation pathway. For inhalation exposure, the off-site resident is assumed to be exposed to dust from on-site soil while at the site and while at home, resulting in exposure for 16 hours/day, 350 days/year. Under this scenario, however, the standard inhalation rate is assumed for the adult resident (20 m3/day or 0.83 m3/hr) and light activity inhalation rate for the child (0.27 m3/hr). Neither of these rates account for probable increased inhalation while using the recreational and/or sports field facilities at the site. The recreational user is assumed to visit the site 3 days/week or 156 days/year, for 4 hours each time. The inhalation rate assumed for the adult recreational user is for moderate activity (1.6 m3/hr) and heavy activity for the child (0.81 m3/hr). In order to not underestimate risk from the inhalation exposure 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR pathway to the off-site residential receptor, the higher activity inhalation rates should be applied to 4 hours/day exposure and the standard/light activity rates to the remainder of the day. For the soil ingestion and dermal contact exposure pathways, the off-site resident and the recreational open space user are assumed to visit the site 3 days/week or 156 days/year. This is likely an underestimation for the off-site resident, as proximity to the site may encourage almost daily use for activities such as dog walking, jogging, after school sports, etc. The off-site residential adult and the recreational user adult are assumed to have dermal contact with soil for 30% of the time compared to children. This assumption is based on a CalEPA recommendation of dermal soil contact exposure frequencies of 2 events/week for an adult and 7 events/week for a child. In the HHRA, the child’s exposure frequency of 156 days/year is adjusted by a factor of 30% to give an adult exposure frequency via dermal soil contact of 45 days/year. This assumption does not seem consistent with the assumption that the adult is exposed to soil by ingestion 156 days/year, since the majority of the soil ingested is probably as a result of dermal contact (i.e., hands, fingers). Additionally, the assumption of 45 days/year for dermal exposure seems low when compared to the assumption made for the business park employee for dermal exposure which is 100 days/year, as it seems plausible that the recreational user would be more likely to have dermal contact with soil than a business park employee. With the exception of the dermal exposure frequency for the business park employee, other assumptions made for that receptor and for the construction worker appear to be appropriate. Oral Bioavailability Factor Oral bioavailability can account for differences in absorption of contaminants from different media (soil, air, water) such that significant impacts on estimated risks can result from even a relatively small adjustment of oral bioavailability (USEPA 2007). USEPA 1989 recommends that bioavailability of substances in soil, food and water should be considered equivalent (a bioavailability factor of 1.0), unless reliable site-specific data indicates otherwise. The Agency indicates that, if risks predicted at a site using default bioavailability assumptions exceed the level of concern for the site, collection of site-specific bioavailability data may be conducted, and guidance is offered. In the HHRA, the oral bioavailability factor of contaminants in soil was assumed to be 1.0 for organic substances, 0.25 for arsenic and 0.50 for PAHs. The arsenic factor is based on a 2002 study in monkeys in which the relative bioavailability of arsenic in soil is reported to be 10.7 to 24.7% (Roberts 2002). In another primate study by Roberts (2007), the relative oral bioavailability of arsenic in 14 soil samples from 12 sites was reported to range from 5 to 31%, with most values in the 10-20% range. According to the HHRA, bioavailability factors for PAHs in soil reported in the literature range from 0.07 to 0.76. The HHWG decided an estimate of PAH bioavailability of 0.50 was health protective. The effect of using the bioavailability factors of 0.25 for arsenic and 0.50 for PAHs was evaluated in our spreadsheet for off-site residential risks created for this review. Results indicate that if oral bioavailability is assumed to be 1.0 for all substances, Scenario 1 risks go from 8.5E- 06 to 2.0E-05 and the HQ goes from 0.31 to 0.48, indicating little effect. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Dermal Absorption Factor In Section 6.6.1 of the HHRA, the dermal absorption factor for arsenic from soil is listed as 0.01. The correct value, however, is 0.03 (CalEPA 1994). The tables for dermal exposure to soil list the correct value. Use of the correct value in the derivation of the pathway-specific intake factors for dermal exposure to soil was verified. Risk Assessment The toxicity criteria used in the risk assessment are appropriate. Hazard quotients are not delineated by target organ, which results in overestimation of hazard. PAH surrogates were used for PAH substances that did not have reference dose (RfD) or reference concentration (RfC) values. It is common to use naphthalene as the non-carcinogenic surrogate because it has the lowest RfD and RfC of the PAHs, The effect of using naphthalene as surrogate was evaluated in the model for off-site residential risks created for this review, and was found to raise the total Hazard Quotient from 0.311 to 0.312, thereby indicating an insignificant effect. We were able to verify the risk and hazard results reported in the HHRA through use of the model for off-site residential receptors created for this review. Cancer risk under this scenario reported in the HHRA is 8.2E-06, compared to 8.5E-06 determined by our model. Chronic hazard index in the HHRA is 0.29, compared to 0.31 determined by our model. A risk assessment based on shallow soil samples (95%UCL of substances found in soil 0-2’ bgs) found slightly higher risks and hazards than the risk assessment based on soil to 10’ bgs. For soils to 2’ bgs, risk was found to be 1.0E-05 and hazard to be 0.64, while for soils to 10’ bgs, risk was found to be 8.2E-06 and hazard to be 0.29. Exposure to lead in soil was evaluated using the DTSC LeadSpread model for a hypothetical on- site resident (an unrealistic exposure scenario as there will be residential deed restrictions for the property). For soil to 10’ bgs, blood lead was found to be below the CDC action level of 10 µg lead/dl blood, with the highest value predicted for a pica child (7.7 µg/dl at the 99th percentile). For soil to 2’ bgs, the blood lead level predicted for the pica child approaches the CDC action level, and is 9.9 µg/dl at the 99th percentile. While this appears to be an unrealistic, overly conservative approach to evaluating the potential for adverse health effects due to the presence of lead in soil at this site, the fact that blood lead predicted for the pica child is so close to the CDC action level warrants further investigation. Health-Based Protective Concentration A health-based protective concentration (HBPC) for TPH under the business park employee exposure scenario was determined in the HHRA, under the simplifying assumption that all TPH is of the more toxic aromatic fraction. The HBPC is the concentration found in soil that corresponds to a hazard quotient of 1.0 for aromatic TPH in soil, and is determined in the HHRA to be 40,130 mg/kg. Using a risk assessment model for this review, a less conservative level of 48,000 mg/kg was determined, verifying the appropriateness of the level proposed in the HHRA. A risk-based protective concentration (RBPC) was also calculated for benzo(a)pyrene for the business park employee scenario, under Scenario 2 (post-remediation, removal of arsenic in 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR soil). It was determined that a soil concentration of benzo(a)pyrene of 0.38 mg/kg corresponds to a risk of 1 in 1 million (10-6). Conclusions and Additional Actions The following summarizes the review of the 2004 HHRA: The site characterization appears to be appropriate and complete but with a few exceptions noted below for dioxins, TPH, and lead. Elimination of arsenic as a COPC from Scenario 24 was an appropriate approach. Further analysis of the values used for the aliphatic and aromatic fractions of TPH is recommended because proper surrogate chemicals were not used for the C4-C10 fraction and median values were used for the aromatic fraction. The methodology used in the derivation of the 95%UCLs used as exposure point concentrations was appropriate. Appropriate exposure assumptions and exposure algorithms were used, with these exceptions: Inhalation exposure for the off-site resident may be underestimated because the inhalation rate used does not account for probable increased inhalation while using the recreational and/or sports field facilities. Soil ingestion for the off-site resident may be underestimated because the risk assessment assumes this receptor visits the site 3 days/week. However proximity to the site may encourage almost daily use for activities such as dog walking, jogging, after school sports, etc. Dermal exposure for the adult off-site resident and recreational user may be underestimated (dermal contact assumed 45 days/year while soil ingestion is assumed to occur 156 days/year). Dermal exposure for the business park employee may be overestimated (it is assumed to occur 200 days/year). The oral bioavailability factors used for arsenic and PAHs may be inaccurate but use of the most recent factors was found not to impact the risk or hazard calculations. Toxicity criteria used are appropriate. Hazard quotients are not delineated by target organ which results in overestimation of hazard. The use of PAH surrogates in the risk assessment is appropriate. We were able to verify the risk and hazard results reported in the HHRA through an independent risk calculation. 4 Scenario 2 assumes that remedial action, including a 4 foot thick soil cap, deed restrictions, etc., will prevent receptors from contacting arsenic in shallow soil at the Northwest Operations Area. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Blood lead levels were estimated based on lead concentrations in soil to 2’ bgs as 9.9 µg/dl at the 99th percentile for the pica child, close to the CDC action level of 10 µg/dl. This may warrant further investigation. Derivation of the health-based protective concentration of TPH in soil for the business park scenario employee is appropriate. A risk-based protective concentration for benzo(a)pyrene in soil should be calculated. In order to address the issues raised above, additional sampling was conducted, as noted in Section 4.11.1, and the HHRA was revised in 2012 and approved by the SERRT in early 2013. The revised HHRA is summarized in Section 4.11.1.3 below. Feasibility Study, March 15, 2007 The Feasibility Study (FS) contains many references to the human health risk assessment and ecological risks (HHRA and pERA) both prepared in 2004. The purpose of an FS is to evaluate various remedial alternatives that address the contamination issues at the site, and to select a preferred remedy. Remedial action objectives (RAOs) are developed with the intent to protect human health and the environment, in ways that are consistent with and based upon the results of the human and ecological risk assessments. In order to accomplish this, the site was divided into five Operable Units (OUs), some with subordinate Areas of Concern (AOCs), based on physical and chemical considerations as well as location and anticipated future use. RAOs and General Response Actions (GRAs) designed to achieve the RAOs were identified, remedial alternatives were proposed for each OU, and then preferred alternatives were selected. Section 2.3.1 of the FS report accurately summarizes the findings and conclusions of the human health risk assessment. The HHRA identified arsenic as a potential human health risk for both open space and commercial development, and the FS assumes the entire 7 acres of the Northwest Operations Area will be subject to remediation of arsenic contamination. Benzene in soil and soil gas was evaluated at the Northwest Operations Area and the FS reported levels up to 26 mg/kg benzene in soil and 0.26 ppmv in soil gas. These values were compared in the FS to Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) developed by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB). Partial intent in developing ESLs was to provide small business and property owners a tool to evaluate site contamination and guide decisions regarding need for additional site investigation, remedial action, or a more detailed risk assessment. This is accomplished by comparing sampling data to ESLs. According to the SFRWQCB (2007), additional evaluation is generally necessary at sites where a chemical is present at concentrations that exceed its ESL. The FS lists media-specific ESLs for benzene from 2005, which are higher than current ESLs: Media Benzene Levels Reported 2005 ESL 2007 ESL Soil <0.005 – 26 mg/kg 0.51 mg/kg 0.27 mg/kg Soil Gas <0.001 – 0.26 ppmv 0.12 ppmv 0.088 ppmv Groundwater <0.5 – 950 µg/l 1800 µg/l 540 µg/l 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR As indicated in the table above, maximum benzene concentrations reported in soil gas and groundwater exceed current ESLs, indicating that additional evaluation is necessary. The FS proposes that additional evaluation might include using the 95%UCL for benzene as the exposure point concentration. That value is 0.27 mg/kg which is equivalent to the current, more stringent ESL. We found that the conclusion in the FS that “the localized presence of volatile hydrocarbons in the Northwest Operations Area may pose a risk to future on-site commercial workers” is reasonable. However, this issue was also evaluated in our review of the HHRA and discussed above under the topic “benzene”. Although the information from the FS evaluated here appears to give support to a finding that more in-depth risk analysis of benzene in soil and soil gas at the Northwest Operations Area should be conducted. The assessment of vapor intrusion by Dr. Carlisle demonstrates that further analysis would not result in a conclusion that risks would be significant or that other remedial alternatives would be appropriate. Therefore, we do not recommend further analysis of benzene risks or vapor intrusion. Remedial Action Plan, December 18, 2007 The intent of the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) is to provide detailed information on how the preferred remedial alternative from the Feasibility Study will be implemented. The RAP contains multiple references to human health, ecological risk, and occupational health that are reviewed and evaluated in this report. The RAP refers to the findings of the FS regarding BTEX5 and benzene present in soil, groundwater and soil gas, indicating that the FS determined that “BTEX does not pose a significant risk to building occupants, provided adequate institutional controls (e.g., vapor barriers) are in place” (RAP page 14). The RAP indicates that institutional controls are designed to protect building occupants from possible vapors from the underlying hydrocarbons. Institutional controls include deed restrictions limiting land use to commercial/industrial purposes, excavation notification requirements, a soil management plan, groundwater use restrictions in impacted areas, and a vapor barrier requirement for any new buildings that are constructed in the Northwest Operations Area. We found that the conclusions in the RAP are appropriate and we do not recommend further assessment. While institutional controls are useful and vapor barriers may fail over time, it appears that the full spectrum of risks posed to future workers without such a barrier in place would be less than significant. Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA) General Comments There were two major issues with the predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA) that were satisfactorily resolved after further review and discussion with the SERRT: 1. Executive decisions made by the ERWG affected the data and methodology used in the pERA. Several critical components of the pERA were discarded or excluded from evaluation 5 Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR based on executive decisions made by the ERWG. It was unclear during the peer review if some decisions were the best for protecting the ecological environment. Recommendations made by the ERWG, and approved by the SERRT, regarding the data and the methodology used in the pERA allowed for a focused, quantitative risk assessment. These decisions were based on data and analyses presented in previous investigations for the site, as well as technical memoranda prepared by the ERWG. There is no indication that any of these decisions resulted in a remediation plan that is not sufficiently protective of the environment. 2. It appears that the ERWG acted as both risk assessor and risk manager. There is no clear separation of risk assessment and risk management functions in the pERA report. The peer review questioned this methodology. The regulatory process at the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm was unique in that it was a voluntary, cooperative process working with a number of stakeholders with interest in the environmental resources at the site. Therefore, it was managed differently than the standard environmental cleanup site that is under an order and has clearly defined risk managers and regulatory oversight. For the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, the ERWG provided technical support to the SERRT regarding the details of the pERA and provided a recommendation for approval to the SERRT when it was ready to be ratified. Neither the ERWG nor the SERRT are risk managers for this site. The Regional Water Quality Control Board is the risk manager for this site. While SERRT members may be affiliated with the risk management agencies or with other stakeholder groups, their role was to provide technical support and oversight, not risk management. The SERRT ratified the Risk Management Summary which provided a set of recommendations of areas that required further evaluation in the Feasibility Study. The FS then evaluated remedial alternatives for those areas and identified a preferred alternative. The FS was also ratified by the SERRT. The FS formed the basis for the Remedial Action Plan. The SERRT has concurred that the RAP reflects the preferred alternative identified in the FS. The RAP will be the first document that will be formally evaluated and approved by the risk managers once the environmental review process (CEQA) is complete. Risk Assessment/Risk Management Regarding Risk Assessment/Risk Management functions, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) guidance establish that Risk Assessment and Risk Management should be distinct and independent environmental assessment processes. For example, the USEPA states “Risk Management is a distinctly different process from risk assessment. Risk assessment establishes whether a risk is present and, if so, the range or magnitude of that risk. In the risk management process, the results of the risk assessment are integrated with other considerations, such as economic or legal concerns, to reach decisions regarding the need for and practicability of implementing various risk reduction activities.” US EPA and CalEPA DTSC guidelines also echo this separation of functions. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Therefore, the pERA should only describe the site, provide background information, describe the process used to assess the threat posed by the site to ecological receptors and then describe the uncertainties associated with the evaluation. Risk management considerations should not be included in the risk assessment report and instead included only in the RMS. Both the SERRT and the ERWG were established to oversee and direct both the risk assessment and risk management activities for the site. Thus, right from the start, risk assessment and risk management functions were combined and the direction given the consultant was therefore inclusive of both tasks. Since there was no clear definition of Risk Assessment and Risk Management functions and executive decisions were taken by the ERWG about what to include and what to exclude from evaluation, the pERA is open to criticism that the risk assessment was written to support risk management decisions made a priori by the ERWG. That being said, we are confident that this did not occur. 4.11.1.3 Updated Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment The Human Health Risk Assessment for the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm (McDaniel Lambert, Inc. 2004; McDaniel Lambert, Inc. 2013) evaluated the potential cancer risk and noncancer hazard to current and possible future Site users from chemicals known to be present at the Project Site. As part of the CEQA process the EIR team conducted a peer review of the 2004 Baseline HHRA. As a result of this peer review and subsequent consultation with SERRT members it was decided that additional Project Site characterization studies were required. Specific characterization activities have included the re-evaluation of the source(s) of dioxins at the Site (Padre 2011a) and the 2011 soil gas assessment (Padre 2012a). The HHRA was revised based on the additional site characterization and updated exposure assumptions, with the results summarized in Table 4.11.1 below 6. OEHHA on behalf of the RWQCB and County Environmental Health have conducted extensive reviews of the HHRA and have found the document to be adequate. These letters are included in Appendix H.2. Exposure assumptions were made in accordance with regulatory guidance (Cal/EPA 1994, USEPA 1989), zoning for the Project Site, previous Site risk assessments, information from local residents, future proposed land uses, and best professional judgment. Potential risk was evaluated for future on-site recreational, commercial and off-site residential land use under two scenarios: 1) the whole site, and (2) a possible “post-remediation” spatial scenario, which assumed that exposure to elevated metals concentrations (i.e. arsenic and lead) in the Northwest Operations Area would be eliminated. Exposure pathways considered in the 2004 Baseline HHRA included incidental ingestion of soil and surface water, dermal contact with soil and surface water, and inhalation of particulates from soil. Based on Site monitoring data and evaluation by the SERRT, HHWG, and OEHHA, risk from direct vapor inhalation exposure was determined to be negligible for future commercial and recreational users of the Site. 6 A Project-specific HHRA was prepared in 2009 and updated in 2012 to address potential health risk following site cleanup and closure activities. The HHRA and update is discussed in Section 4.11-4. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The estimated incremental lifetime cancer risks (ILCRs) were within the 1 in 1,000,000 (1x10-6) to 1 in 10,000 (1x10-4) risk management range stipulated by the USEPA (1990) for all receptors in both exposure scenarios. Cancer risk at the Site under Scenario 1 was driven by arsenic and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP). Risk under Scenario 2 was driven by BaP only. The estimated noncancer hazards were below the level of concern of 1.0 for all receptors in Scenarios 1 and 2. For Scenario 1, the primary hazard drivers for the recreational child and off-site resident child were TPH and arsenic in soil. For Scenario 2, TPH alone drove the noncancer hazard for the recreational child and off-site resident child. For all receptors and exposure scenarios, the blood lead levels calculated using the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) LeadSpread model were below the CDC action level of 10 g lead/dl blood (the benchmark at the time), based on a model run for a hypothetical on-site resident, even though there will be a residential deed restriction for the property, who was exposed to lead in Scenario 1. Table 4.11-1 Summary of Project Site 2004 Baseline HHRA Results Receptor Total Cancer Risk1 Total Noncancer Hazard Scenario 1 – Including Northwest Operations Area Off-site Resident Adult 8.2E-06 0.03 Off-site Resident Child NA 0.29 Recreational User Adult 8.2E-06 0.03 Recreational User Child NA 0.29 Business Park Employee 2.9E-06 0.03 Intrusive Construction Worker 2.8E-07 0.23 Scenario 2 – Excluding Northwest Operations Area2 Off-site Resident Adult 4.4E-06 0.03 Off-site Resident Child NA 0.21 Recreational User Adult 4.4E-06 0.03 Recreational User Child NA 0.21 Business Park Employee 1.7E-06 0.02 Intrusive Construction Worker 1.7E-07 0.21 Note: 8.2E-06 = 0.0000082 = 8.2 excess cancers per million people exposed. 1 Cancer risk is age-adjusted and assumes 6 years of exposure as a child and 24 years as an adult. 2 Scenario 2 assumes that remedial activities would eliminate exposure to metals in the Northwest Operations Area and arsenic was not included in the risk and hazard calculations. NA=Not Applicable 4.11.1.4 Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment In 2004 a predictive ecological risk assessment (pERA) was prepared to provide a screening- level evaluation of potential ecological risks associated with the Project Site using the existing site data and site characterization reports. Key elements of the pERA included: pERA consists of Tier 1 and Tier 2 assessment. Tier 2 evaluates 2 risk scenarios Site-wide 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Site minus the former operations area Important habitats evaluated include both terrestrial and wetland. COPECs selected include arsenic, lead, PAHs, and TPH. CSM identified complete exposure pathways between impacted site media and plant, invertebrate, and wildlife receptors. Eight terrestrial and eight wetland receptors evaluated. The pERA generally followed the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Guidance for Ecological Risk Assessment at Hazardous Waste Sites and Permitted Facilities Part A: Overview” (DTSC, 1996). The pERA consists of four basic components: problem formulation, exposure assessment, effects assessment, and risk characterization. Due to the conservatism of the evaluation, any determinations of Level 1 or Level 2 risk should not be considered definitive conclusions, but, rather, should be interpreted as conservative estimates of potential risk. As part of the cooperative process with the ERWG, there were a number of specific changes to the spatial scope of the pERA. Most significantly, Reservoirs 5 and 7 and all surface hydrocarbon expressions (solid, pliable or liquid oil on the surface) were excluded from the pERA. These areas were excluded because it was generally agreed that the tar would likely exceed toxicity thresholds and that many of these areas are physical hazards to the ecological receptors and would have to be removed or caped as part of the remediation project. As such, it was acknowledged that evaluation of risk from these areas would not add resolution to the risk assessment and management process since they would be removed or capped as part of the remediation. The pERA includes a two tier analysis. Tier 1 includes a site assessment using the most conservative exposure and effects assumptions. The results are used to focus the Tier 2 assessment. The Tier 2 assessment uses refined exposure estimates and a range of effects criteria to evaluate site-wide risks. Those compounds that demonstrate Level 1 site-wide risk are evaluated spatially (i.e., on an individual sample-specific location basis). In addition, the Tier 2 assessment includes evaluation of two different risk scenarios. Scenario 1 evaluates what is referred to as "the whole site" for the rest of the document, but which actually is composed of the whole site minus Reservoirs 5 and 7 and all surface hydrocarbon expressions. Scenario 2 is a possible post-remediation” scenario and excludes the former operations area from the exposure estimates, as well as Reservoirs 5 and 7 and surface hydrocarbon expressions. In general terms, terrestrial/wetland plants and terrestrial/sediment invertebrates are the most sensitive receptors evaluated in the pERA, especially in terms of risk due to petroleum exposure. Potential risk to wildlife (i.e., birds and mammals) from exposure to petroleum (either as TPH or PAHs) is generally de minimus. Spatially the majority of TPH benchmark exceedances are on or near identified surface hydrocarbon expressions. A few notable exceptions include several samples within Reservoir 4 and two samples in the wetland areas in the southwest corner of the site (B-52 in Reservoir 6 and S-59). The main potential risks to wildlife identified in the pERA are from exposure to lead and to a lesser extent arsenic. Elevated concentrations of both 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR compounds are localized and limited to the former Northwest Operations Area (arsenic and lead) and tank bottoms in the northeastern portion of the site (lead). While the pERA has identified the potential for risk, as described above, the screening-level framework resulted in conservative estimates of risk. A validation study focused on the most significant sources of uncertainty would further refine the evaluation and could corroborate these initial findings or result in a finding of de minimus risk. Results of the pERA, and potential impacts to biological resources, are discussed and evaluated in Section 4.2.4 (Biological Resources) of this EIR. 4.11.1.5 Airport Land Use and Hazards The Project Site is located beneath the departure pattern for Runway 11-29 of San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA), which extended Runway 29 by approximately 500 feet in 2001. This expanded the airport safety zones beyond those originally considered in the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP). The State of California Department of Transportation’s Airport Land Use Planning Handbook provides recommendations, based on runway length, for the size and configuration of aviation safety zones, those safety zones are depicted in Figure 2-4 refer to Section 2.0, Project Description). Airport Safety Areas The entire Project Site is located within one of the various SLOCRA Safety Areas (see Project Description Figure 2-25). The City’s AASP provides a list allowable land uses for each of zoning designations. In addition, the Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) provides guidance on what types of land uses are allowed within each airport safety zone. Runway protection zones (RPZs) are trapezoidal-shaped areas located at ground level beyond each end of a runway. The dimensions of RPZs vary depending upon the type of landing approach available at the airport (visual, non-precision, or precision) and the characteristics of the critical aircraft operating at the airport (weight and approach speed). Ideally, each runway protection zone should be entirely clear of all objects. On portions of the RPZ not under airport control, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that churches, schools, hospitals, office buildings, shopping centers, and other places of public assembly such as recreational facilities, as well as fuel storage facilities, be prohibited. Automobile parking is considered acceptable only on the outer edges of RPZs (outside the extended object free area). Safety Area S-1 is the area within the vicinity of which aircraft operate frequently or in conditions of reduced visibility at altitudes less than 500 feet above ground level (AGL). Safety Area S-1 is further divided into the following zones, each with different hazards and development limitations. Airport Safety Area S-1a Airport Safety Area S-1a includes the area which is within 500 feet on either side of the extended runway centerline and is within 500 feet of an existing or planned runway end. This is an area with frequent or low visibility aircraft operations at less than 500 feet above ground level which are located within 250 feet of extended runway centerlines and within 3000 feet of a runway end. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Airport Safety Area S-1b Airport Safety Area S-1b is comprised of those portions of Safety Area S-1 which are not included in Safety Area S-1a, but are within probable gliding distance for aircraft on expected approach or departure courses; also includes State-defined sideline Safety Areas, inner turning zones and outer safety zones for both Runway 11-29 and Runway 7-25 and portions of existing Airport Land Use Zone 3. Aviation safety hazards to be particularly considered in this area include mechanical failures, fuel exhaustion, deviation from glideslope or minimum descent altitude (MDA) during instrument flight rules (IFR) operations (due to pilot error or equipment malfunction), loss of control during short approach procedures, stall/spin incidents during engine-out maneuvers in multi-engine aircraft, loss of control during “go around” or missed approach procedures, and midair collisions. Airport Safety Area S-1c Airport Safety Area S-1b is comprised of those portions of Safety Area S-1 which are not included in Safety Areas S-1a or S-1b, but are adjacent to (within 0.5 nautical mile (nm)) frequent or low-visibility aircraft operations at less than 500 feet above ground level. Aviation safety hazards to be considered in this area include mechanical failures, deviation from localizer or VOR during IFR operations (due to pilot error or equipment malfunction), stall/spin incidents during engine-out maneuvers in multi-engine aircraft, loss of control during “go around” or missed approach procedures, and loss of visual references by aircraft performing circle-to-land procedures. The outer border of Airport Safety Area S-1c is rectangular in shape. It is 3.68 nm 22,382 feet) in length and 1 nm (6076.115 feet) in width. The long sides of the rectangle are parallel to and 1/2 nm from the extended runway centerline, while the short sides are located 8,542 feet northwest of the threshold of Runway 11 and 7,542 feet southeast of the threshold of Runway 29. ALUP Policies The ALUP contains several safety-related policies to address future development. Under the ALUP a proposed general plan, general plan amendment, specific plan, specific plan amendment, zoning ordinance, zoning ordinance amendment, building regulation modification, or individual development proposal would be determined to be inconsistent with the ALUP if the proposed project or local action: Policy S-1 – Would permit or lack sufficient provisions to prohibit structures and other obstacles within the Runway Protection Zones for any runway at the Airport, as depicted in ALUP Figure 4. Refer to Section 2.0, Project Description, Figure 2-4. Policy S-2 – Would permit or fail to adequately prohibit any future residential or nonresidential development or redevelopment which would create, within the site to be developed or redeveloped, a density greater than specified in ALUP Table 7 or any mixed-use development or redevelopment which would create, within the site to be developed or redeveloped, densities greater than illustrated in ALUP Figures 5 through 8. Refer to Table 4.11-2 and Figure 4.11-4 below. Policy S-3 – Would permit or fail to adequately prohibit any future development project which specifies, entails, or would result in a greater building coverage than permitted by ALUP Table 7. Refer to Table 4.11-2 below. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.11-2 Planning Requirements and Density Adjustments for Land Uses within the SLOCRA Aviation Safety Areas Aviation Safety Area Maximum Building Coverage (% of gross area) Maximum Density of Use Non-Residential) persons/acre1 Maximum Density of Residential Development d.u./acre2 Special Function Land Uses Allowed High Intensity Land Uses Allowed Runway Protection Zone 0 5 0 no no Airport Safety Area 1a 5 30 0.2 no no With approved ACOS n/a 40 0.2 no no Airport Safety Area 1b 10 40 0.2 no no With approved ACOS n/a 506 0.2 no no Airport Safety Area 1c 15 50 0.2 no no With approved ACOS n/a 606 0.2 no no With approved ACOS and Detailed Area Plan (DAP)3 n/a 80 0.2 no no Within CDZ specified by an approved ACOS n/a 90 0.2 no no Within CDZ specified by approved ACOS and DAP3 n/a 120 0.2 no no Airport Safety Area 2 20 150 6 no no With approved ACOS n/a 150 12 no no With approved ACOS and Detailed Area Plan3 n/a 150 185 yes4 yes4 Within CDZ specified by an approved ACOS n/a 180 18 no no Within CDZ specified by approved ACOS and DAP3 n/a Unlimited Unlimited yes4 yes4 1 Refers to the maximum number of persons that a development may be expected to attract during the course of normal operations. 2 Refers to the maximum number of dwelling units (as defined by this ALUP) per acre of gross land area allowable on any parcel under the terms of a proposed project or local action. 3 Requires that the development be controlled by a Detailed Area Plan that has been developed in consultation with the ALUC and has been reviewed by the ALUC and has been determined to be consistent with the ALUP after the date of adoption of this amendment. 4 Location and type of Special Function and/or High Intensity land uses shall be designated by Detailed Area Plan and shall be subject to ALUC approval. 5 Although a maximum residential density of up to 18 d.u./acre may be allowed for designated parcels within the Detailed Area Plan, the Detailed Area Plan must also provide for areas of lesser allowable densities, so that the maximum number of dwelling units which can be established within the Detailed Plan area, under conditions of maximum build-out, will not exceed 15 d.u./acre. 6 Except that, in those portions of Safety Areas S 1b and S 1c which are a distance of 1 nm or greater from the end of any active runway, a maximum non- residential density of up to 75 persons/acre will be allowed. Source: ALUC, 2005. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-4 Allowable Population Densities within the SLOCRA Aviation Safety Areas Source: ALUP, 2005. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Policy S-4 – Would permit or fail to adequately prohibit high intensity land uses or special land use functions (impaired egress uses or unusually hazardous uses), except that, when conditions specified by ALUP Table 7 for density adjustments have been determined to be met by the ALUC, high intensity land and/or special function uses may be allowed in Aviation Safety Area S-2. Refer to Table 4.11-2 below. The Project Site is currently clear of any residential units or large scale non-residential activities. Therefore, the current land use meets the ALUP compatibility requirements and does not create a safety risk Aircraft Wildlife Strike Hazards Wetlands are often used as forms of mitigation for projects on or near airports, and the Project Site currently contains several wetland areas that will be restored and enhanced. However, wetlands are typically considered wildlife hazard attractants. According to the FAA, wetland conservation, preservation, or mitigation is strongly discouraged on airport property (i.e., owned by the airport) and is recommended to remain outside the separation areas within an Airport Influence Area (AIA) (Caltrans, 2011). The entire Project Site is within the AIA; therefore, the FAA policies would discourage additional wetland conservation, preservation, or mitigation at the Project Site. Many types of agricultural areas are considered wildlife hazard attractants due to the presence of livestock and an available food source for wildlife. The FAA discourages agricultural activities, including hay crops, on airport property (Caltrans, 2011). Parks, golf courses, natural resources, and natural areas have the potential to create wildlife hazard attractants on or near airports. These areas may provide wildlife corridors, roost sites, rookeries, migratory flyway stop over sites or numerous other functions that may benefit wildlife but, due to their location, may create situations where wildlife are crossing airspace for approach, departing, or training aircraft (Caltrans, 2011). Based on a wetland delineation of the Project Site conducted in 2008, the Project Site contains 49 acres of Federal wetlands, 3.4 acres of “one-parameter” wetlands, and 3.9 acres falling under the category of Other Waters of the U.S (Padre 2008b). The frequency of aircraft bird strikes, referred to as wildlife strikes, varies substantially based on airport location and surrounding habitat. Figure 4.11-5 shows the wildlife strike frequency for various airports in California, including the SLOCRA within a five mile radius, while Figure 4.14-6 normalizes the wildlife strike frequency based on airport traffic volume. The Statewide average is one wildlife strike per 4,350 takeoffs and landings, while SLOCRA experiences one wildlife strike per 4,656 takeoffs and landings. The median wildlife strike rate in California is one wildlife strike per 4,670 takeoffs and landings. Therefore, wildlife strike rates at the SLOCRA are about average. A closer examination of wildlife strikes at the SLOCRA shows that there is a considerable amount of interannual variability as shown in Figure 4.11-7. Since reporting of wildlife strikes are voluntary, it is unclear how much of this interannual variability is related to pilot awareness and reporting, or if there are substantial variations in bird populations in the airport area. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-5 Number of Wildlife Strikes at Primary Commercial Airports in California (1990-2010) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 SACRAMENTO INTL SAN FRANCISCO INTL LOS ANGELES INTL METRO OAKLAND INTL MINETA SAN JOSE INTL ONTARIO INTL ARPT SANTA BARBARA MUNI SAN DIEGO INTL BOB HOPE ARPT JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT LONG BEACH-DAUGH FLD FRESNO YOSEMITE INTL SAN LUIS COUNTY RGNL ARPT PALM SPRINGS INTL OXNARD ARPT SANTA MARIA PUBLIC MEADOWS FIELD ARPT REDDING MUNI STOCKTON METRO SONOMA COUNTY ARPT MONTEREY PENINSULA MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR ARCATA AIRPORT MODESTO CITY-COUNTY CHICO MUNI AIRPORT JACK MCNAMARA FLD of Wildlife Strikes 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-6 Number of Take-off and Landings per Strike at Primary Commercial Airports in California (1990-2010) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 SACRAMENTO INTL SAN FRANCISCO INTL LOS ANGELES INTL METRO OAKLAND INTL MINETA SAN JOSE INTL ONTARIO INTL ARPT SANTA BARBARA MUNI SAN DIEGO INTL BOB HOPE ARPT JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT LONG BEACH-DAUGH FLD FRESNO YOSEMITE INTL SAN LUIS COUNTY RGNL ARPT PALM SPRINGS INTL OXNARD ARPT SANTA MARIA PUBLIC MEADOWS FIELD ARPT REDDING MUNI STOCKTON METRO SONOMA COUNTY ARPT MONTEREY PENINSULA MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR ARCATA AIRPORT MODESTO CITY-COUNTY CHICO MUNI AIRPORT JACK MCNAMARA FLD Number of Take-off and Landings per Strike 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-37 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-7 Number of Wildlife Strikes at SLOCRA A breakdown of wildlife strikes as a function of flight phase is presented in Figure 4.11-8. As would be expected, a majority of the wildlife strikes occur in the air, with fewer strikes while the aircraft is on the ground (takeoff run and landing roll). Wildlife strikes by phase of flight and the effect the strikes have had are presented in Figures 4.11-8 and 4.11-9. In most cases, aircraft flight is unaffected by a wildlife strike, although there have been numerous precautionary landings (10 over the 1990-2010 period), and two aborted takeoffs. However, no aircraft crashes have occurred at the SLOCRA as a result of a wildlife strike. Aircraft damage has also been relatively minor as a result of wildlife strikes (Figure 4.11-10). In most cases, no damage is reported from the wildlife strike. Where damage has been reported, parts included the radome, nose, engine, prop, wing, ingested in jet turbine, and a damaged windshield wiper. Of the 48 wildlife strikes at SLOCRA, 12 flights were adversely affected and 13 aircraft received minor to moderate damage. Species that have been involved in aircraft strikes include seagulls, hawks, pigeons, blackbirds, sparrows, finches, ducks, owls, American kestrels, meadowlarks and turkey vultures. Hawks are the most frequently impacted species. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010# of 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-8 Number of Wildlife Strikes at SLOCRA by Phase of Flight Figure 4.11-9 Effect of Wildlife Strike on Aircraft Flight at SLOCRA 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Approach Climb Decent Landing Roll Take -off Run Unknown of WildlifeStrikesPhase of Flight0 5 10 15 20 25 Aborted Take- Off None Precautionay Landing Unknown ofWildlife 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-39 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-10 Level of Damage to Aircraft from Wildlife Strike at SLOCRA 4.11.1.6 Study Area The area that could be impacted by a release includes the Project Site and any transportation routes associated with proposed trucking of hazardous materials to the landfill destinations identified in Section 2.0, Project Description. An upset condition from Project operations that subsequently release hazardous materials at the Project Site or along transportation routes could adversely impact public safety and/or environmental resources in the region. The potentially affected area includes: Businesses and residences near the Project Site; and Trucking routes between the Project Site and the three proposed landfills (i.e., Santa Maria, Kettleman Hills, and Buttonwillow). Populations in the residential areas were estimated using the US Census Bureau Year 2010 information on average populations per household. Aerial photographs were utilized to determine exact residence locations. Specific population densities were calculated for the residential areas near the Project Site by examining aerial photographs and structural densities, and estimating population densities using the census average for persons per household. Vehicular traffic along area roadways is based on traffic counts available from the County of San Luis Obispo and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 None Small Medium Unknown of WildlifeStrikesLevel 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.11.2 Regulatory Setting Remediation and development activities at the Project Site would be covered by a wide variety of federal, state, and local regulations, especially in the areas of worker safety and waste disposal. 4.11.2.1 Federal There are numerous federal laws that cover hazardous materials and hazardous waste sites, as well as future hazardous material usage associated with future development. Hazardous Waste Handling Requirements Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Associated Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments, 40 CFR 260 Implementation of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) resulted in the creation of a major federal hazardous waste regulatory program that is administered by the EPA. Under RCRA, the EPA regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste (crude tank sediments, for example). RCRA was amended by the Associated Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA), which affirmed and extended the concept of regulating hazardous wastes from generation through disposal. HSWA specifically prohibits the use of certain techniques for the disposal of some hazardous wastes. Under RCRA, individual states may implement their own hazardous waste programs instead of RCRA, as long as the state program is at least as stringent as the Federal RCRA requirements. The EPA approved California's program to implement Federal hazardous waste regulations on August 1, 1992. Asbestos and Lead National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, 40 CFR 61 Subpart M Under Subpart M, an asbestos containing materials survey must be performed prior to renovation or demolition activities. Notification to the lead agency is required 14 days prior to the start of work (disturbance of asbestos containing materials). Additional Federal- and State-level asbestos requirements related to OSHA standards in 29 CFR 1926.1101 are covered by the Asbestos Construction Standard, Title 8, CCR Section 1529, which is described separately below. The Worker Protection Rule (40 CFR 763, Subpart G, and 29 CFR 1910.1001) provides worker protection measures through engineering controls, worker training, labeling, respiratory protection, and waste management; the rule also defines asbestos containing materials and sets the permissible exposure level for asbestos. Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, or Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, the EPA requires local agencies to regulate the storage and handling of hazardous materials and requires development of a plan to mitigate the release of hazardous materials. Businesses that handle any of the specified hazardous materials must submit to government agencies (i.e., fire departments or Public Health Departments), an inventory of the hazardous materials, an emergency response plan, and an employee training program. The business plans must provide a description of the types of hazardous materials/waste on-site and the location of these materials. The information in the 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-41 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR business plan can then be used in the event of an emergency to determine the appropriate response action, the need for public notification, and the need for evacuation. Hazardous Materials Management Planning Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 40 CFR 68 The EPA requires facilities that handle listed regulated substances to develop Risk Management Programs (RMP) to prevent accidental releases of these substances. RMP materials are submitted to both local agencies (generally the fire department) and the Federal EPA. Stationary sources with more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance shall be evaluated to determine the potential for, and impacts of, accidental releases of that substance. Under certain conditions, the owner or operator of a stationary source may be required to develop and submit a Risk Management Program. Risk Management Programs consist of three main elements: a hazard assessment that includes off site consequences analyses and a five-year accident history; a prevention program; and an emergency response program. National Contingency Plan Requirements Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plans, 40 CFR 112.3 and 112.7 Facilities that store large volumes of hazardous materials are required to have a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plans (SPCCP) per the requirements of 40 CFR 112 submitted to the EPA. The SPCCP is designed to prevent spills from on-site facilities and includes requirements for secondary containment, provides emergency response procedures, and establishes training requirements. Hazardous Materials Transportation The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 CFR 171, Subchapter C The DOT, Federal Highway Administration, and the Federal Railroad Administration regulate transportation of hazardous materials at the Federal level (The State also has requirements. See below). The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act requires that carriers report accidental releases of hazardous materials to DOT at the earliest practical moment. Other incidents that must be reported include deaths, injuries requiring hospitalization, and property damage exceeding $50,000. Worker Health and Safety Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 CFR et seq. Under the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, the federal OSHA has adopted numerous regulations pertaining to worker safety (29 CFR) and provides oversight and enforcement (along with CalOSHA in California). These regulations set standards for safe workplaces and work practices, including the reporting of accidents and occupational injuries. Some OSHA regulations contain standards relating to hazardous materials handling, including workplace conditions, employee protection requirements, first aid, and fire protection, as well as material handling and storage. Relevant citations are summarized below. Hazard Communication, 29 CFR 1910.1200 The purpose of the OSHA Hazard Communication law is to ensure that the hazards of all chemicals produced or imported are evaluated, and that information concerning any potential hazards is transmitted to employers and employees. This transmittal of information is to be accomplished by means of comprehensive hazard communication programs, which are to include 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-42 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR container labeling and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee training. Process Safety Management, 29 CFR 1910.119 Under this section, facilities that use, store, manufacture, handle, process, or move hazardous materials are required to: Conduct employee safety training; Have an inventory of safety equipment relevant to potential hazards; Have knowledge on use of the safety equipment; Prepare an illness prevention program; Provide hazardous substance exposure warnings; Prepare an emergency response plan; and Prepare a fire prevention plan. In addition, 29 CFR 1910.119, Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, OSHA specifically requires prevention program elements to protect workers at facilities that have toxic, flammable, reactive or explosive materials. Prevention program elements are aimed at preventing or minimizing the consequences of catastrophic releases of chemicals and include process hazard analyses, formal training programs for employees and contractors, investigation of equipment mechanical integrity, and an emergency response plan. Overview of 6 CFR Part 27 Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards, 6 CFR 27. The Federal Department of Homeland Security established the chemical facility anti-terrorism standards of 2007. This 2007 rule established risk-based performance standards for the security of chemical facilities. It requires covered chemical facilities to prepare Security Vulnerability Assessments, which identify facility security vulnerabilities, and to develop and implement Site Security Plans, which include measures that satisfy the identified risk-based performance standards. Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Regulation, Part 77 Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace A Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (Form 7460-1) maybe required by the FAA. The FAA Airport Design Guide, Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, contains guidance pertaining to land uses within the RPZ. As part of FAA grant assurances, if an airport sponsor receives federal funds for an airport, it is required that use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport be restricted to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations. 4.11.2.2 State State laws address gas and liquid pipelines, oil and gas facilities and hazardous materials and waste. The following sections discuss each of these. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-43 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR California Health and Safety Code Division 20, Chapter 6.5, §25100-25249, Hazardous Waste Control (administered by the CalEPA and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control); Division 20, Chapter 6.95, §255500, et seq. Hazardous Materials Management Plan and Community Right-to-Know and Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory Business Plan Program, administered by local fire departments and the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA)); Proposition 65 Compliance, H&SC §25249.5 et seq., administer by the CARB and the local APCDs; H&SC §§25340-25392, Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act administered by the CalEPA and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control); and H&SC §§25531-255413, California Accidental Release Prevention Program, administered by local fire departments and the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA) California Water Code Division 7, Water Quality (Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act), administered by the State Water Resources Control Board California Code of Regulations Title 4, California Civil Code, §1102.6, §1103.4, and §1353 cover disclosure requirements for property transfers in the vicinity of an airport. Title 8, §1529, Asbestos Construction Standard administered by the Department of Industrial Relations and CalOSHA); Title 8, §1532.1, Lead Construction Standard administered by the Department of Industrial Relations and CalOSHA); Title 8, §5189 and §5192, Accidental Release Plan administered by local fire departments and the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA); Title 14, Division 2, Department of Conservation, administered by DOGGR; Title 16, §11010; Subdivided Lands, Investigation, Regulation and Report. Requires any person who intends to offer subdivided lands within this state for sale or lease shall file with the Department of Real Estate an application for a public report consisting of a notice of intention and a completed questionnaire on a form prepared by the department. This includes limitations on development due to FAA land use regulations for airport runway and safety zones. Title 19, §2729, Employee Training Program, administered by the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) and local fire departments and departments of public health; Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Hazardous Wastes (administered by the CalEPA and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control); 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-44 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Title 22, Division 4.5, §§66260-67786, Hazardous Waste Requirements (administered by the CalEPA and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control); and Title 22, §66265.50-.56, Contingency/Emergency Response Plan administered by local fire departments and the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA). California Accident Release Prevention The California Accident Release Prevention program mirrors the Federal Risk Management program, except that it adds external events and seismic analysis to the requirements and includes facilities with lower inventories of materials. A California Accident Release Prevention or Risk Management Plan, as administered by the Fire Departments and the EPA, if applicable, is a document prepared by the owner or operator of a stationary source containing detailed information including: Regulated substances held on-site at the stationary source; Off-site consequences of an accidental release of a regulated substance; The accident history at the stationary source; The emergency response program for the stationary source; Coordination with local emergency responders; Hazard review or process hazard analysis; Operating procedures at the stationary source; Training of the stationary source’s personnel; Maintenance and mechanical integrity of the stationary source’s physical plant; and Incident investigation. Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Waste Hazardous Waste Control Law The Hazardous Waste Control Law is administered by the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). DTSC has adopted extensive regulations governing the generation, transportation, and disposal of hazardous wastes. These regulations impose cradle-to-grave requirements for handling hazardous wastes in a manner that protects human health and the environment. The Hazardous Waste Control Law regulations establish requirements for identifying, packaging, and labeling hazardous wastes. They prescribe management practices for hazardous wastes; establish permit requirements for hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal, and transportation; and identify hazardous wastes that cannot be disposed of in landfills. Hazardous waste is tracked from the point of generation to the point of disposal or treatment using hazardous waste manifests. The manifests list a description of the waste, its intended destination, and regulatory information about the waste. Hazardous Materials Management Planning The Office of Emergency Services, in support of local government, coordinates overall state agency response to major disasters. The office is responsible for assuring the State's readiness to respond to and recover from natural, manmade, and war-caused emergencies, and for assisting 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-45 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR local governments in their emergency preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. During major emergencies, Office of Emergency Services may call upon all State agencies to help provide support. Due to their expertise, the California National Guard, California Highway Patrol (CHP), Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Conservation Corps, Department of Social Services, and Caltrans are the agencies most often asked to respond and assist in emergency response activities. Hazardous Materials Transportation in California California regulates the transportation of hazardous waste originating or passing through the State in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations. The CHP and Caltrans have primary responsibility for enforcing Federal and State regulations and responding to hazardous materials transportation emergencies. The CHP enforces materials and hazardous waste labeling and packing regulations that prevent leakage and spills of material in transit and provide detailed information to cleanup crews in the event of an incident. Vehicle and equipment inspection, shipment preparation, container identification, and shipping documentation are all part of the responsibility of the CHP. The CHP conducts regular inspections of licensed transporters to ensure regulatory compliance. Caltrans has emergency chemical spill identification teams at locations throughout the State. Hazardous waste must be regularly removed from generating sites by licensed hazardous waste transporters. Transported materials must be accompanied by hazardous waste manifests. Hazardous Material Worker Safety, California Occupational Safety and Health Act The California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) is responsible for assuring worker safety in the handling and use of chemicals in the workplace. Cal/OSHA assumes primary responsibility for developing and enforcing workplace safety regulations in Title 8 CCR. Cal/OSHA hazardous materials regulations include requirements for safety training, availability of safety equipment, hazardous substance exposure warnings, and emergency action and fire prevention plan preparation. Cal/OSHA also enforces hazard communication program regulations, which contain training and information requirements, including procedures for identifying and labeling hazardous substances. The hazard communication program also requires that Material Safety Data Sheets be available to employees and that employee information and training programs be documented. Asbestos and Lead Asbestos-containing construction materials are defined by Cal/OSHA as any internal building component containing greater than 0.1 percent asbestos. This is more stringent than Federal definitions of asbestos-containing materials, which contain asbestos in concentrations greater than 1 percent. Asbestos containing materials apply to all building components, including exterior materials and roofing. Lead-containing paint is defined as paint containing 0.006 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) lead by weight. Lead-based paint is defined as paint containing 0.05 mg/kg lead by weight. Existing asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint surveys cannot identify all materials, especially in or on internal building components. Compliance with 29 CFR 1926.1101, 40 CFR 61 Subpart M (NESHAPS), San Luis Obispo APCD District Rule 701, and similar State laws listed below, requires sampling of suspect or presumed asbestos containing materials before they are disturbed, if it is in a quantity of more than 260 linear feet 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-46 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR on pipes, or 160 square feet on other facility components, or 35 cubic feet. Cal/OSHA requires registered asbestos abatement contractors to remove asbestos-containing construction materials in quantities greater than 100 square feet. The Asbestos Construction Standard, Title 8 CCR Section 1529. The Cal/OSHA asbestos standard for construction activities applies to all asbestos work where asbestos-containing construction materials may be disturbed in quantities provided above. The Asbestos Construction Standard regulates asbestos exposure in all construction work as defined in Title 8 CCR Section 1502, including, but not limited to, the following: Demolition or salvage of structures where asbestos is present; Removal or encapsulation of materials containing asbestos; Construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof, that contain asbestos; Installation of products containing asbestos; Asbestos spill/emergency cleanup; Transportation, disposal, storage, containment of and housekeeping activities involving asbestos or products containing asbestos, on the site or location at which construction activities are performed; Excavation which may involve exposure to asbestos as a natural constituent that is not related to asbestos mining and milling activities; Routine facility maintenance; and Erection of new electric transmission and distribution lines and equipment, and alteration, conversion and improvement of the existing transmission and distribution lines and equipment. Cal/OSHA Lead Construction Standard, Title 8 CCR Section 1532.1. The Lead Construction Standard applies to all construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. The standard applies to any construction activity that may release dust or fumes including, but not limited to, manual scraping, manual sanding, heat gun applications, power tool cleaning, rivet busting, abrasive blasting, welding, cutting, or torch burning of lead based coatings. Unless otherwise determined by approved testing methods, all paints and other surface coatings are assumed to contain lead at prescribed concentrations, depending on the application date of the paint or coating. All construction work excluded from coverage in the general industry standard for lead by Section 5198(a)(2) is covered by this standard. Construction work is defined as work for construction, alteration, or repair, including painting and decorating. It includes, but is not limited to, the following: Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present; Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead; 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-47 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR New construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof, that contain lead, or materials containing lead; Installation of products containing lead; Transportation, disposal, storage, or containment of lead or materials containing lead on the site or location at which construction activities are performed; and Maintenance operations associated with the construction activities. 4.11.2.3 Local County Conservation and Open Space Element In 1995, the County of San Luis Obispo adopted the Energy Element as part of the County's General Plan, subsequently merged with the Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE). The COSE was updated in 2010 and contains a goal of protecting public health, safety, and environment and several policies that promote the stated goal. The applicable policies include: Policy E 7.1 (19). To reduce the possibility of injury to the public, facility employees, or the environment, the applicant shall submit an emergency response plan which details response procedures for incidents that may affect human health and safety or the environment. The plan shall be based on the results of the comprehensive risk analysis. In the case of a facility modification, the existing response plan shall be evaluated by the safety review committee and revisions made as recommended. Policy E 7.1 (23). Encourage existing and proposed facilities to focus on measures and procedures that prevent oil, gas, and other toxic releases into the environment. This policy is to ensure that facilities: (1) take measures to prevent releases and spills; (2) prepare for responding to a spill or release; and (3) provide for the protection of sensitive resources. A review of a facilities spill response plan, or reports from other agencies, shall be completed to monitor compliance. County Land Use Ordinance These regulations were established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety and welfare, and more particularly: A. To implement the General Plan and to guide and manage the future growth of the county in compliance with the General Plan; B. To regulate land use in a manner that will encourage and support the orderly development and beneficial use of lands within the county; C. To minimize adverse effects on the public resulting from the inappropriate creation, location, use or design of building sites, buildings, land uses, parking areas, or other forms of land development by providing appropriate standards for development; D. To protect and enhance the significant natural, historic, archaeological and scenic resources within the county as identified by the county General Plan; and 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-48 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR E. To assist the public in identifying and understanding regulations affecting the development and use of land. The following sections of the County Land Use Ordinance address potential hazards associated with the proposed Project and Site: Flammable and Combustible Liquid Storage. County Land Use Ordinance section 22.10.070 includes requirements for flammable and combustible liquid storage relating to: applicability, permit requirements, limitation on use, limitation on quantity, setbacks, and including California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL FIRE) recommendations, as applicable. Without approval through a Conditional Use Permit, above ground storage of combustible liquid is 20,000 gallons and 2,000 gallons for flammable liquids. Explosives Storage. County Land Use Ordinance section 22.10.050 includes storage location requirements based on land use category, setback requirements and facility construction and buffering requirements. Flood Hazard Area. County Land Use Ordinance section 22.14.060 includes construction standards for flood hazard areas, and a prohibition of the storage or processing of materials that in time of flooding are buoyant, flammable, or explosive; that could be injurious to human, animal, or plant life; or that may unduly affect floodway capacity or unduly increase flood heights. County Safety Element This Safety Element has two basic principles: to be ready for disaster, and manage development to reduce risk. The following policies, programs and standards would apply to the proposed Project. Policy S-24 Aircraft Hazards. Reduce the potential for disaster from airport and land use conflicts in conjunction with the Airport Land Use plans. Program S-64 Coordinate County and City planning at airport safety zones. Standard S-65 General plan and zoning for land uses situated off the end of active runways should be low density, and preferably open space or agriculture. Update and rezone airport safety zones for appropriate land uses to comply with adopted airport land use plans. Program S-66 Maintain Aircraft Rescue Fire Fighting (ARFF) response, training and equipment to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards and work to continue to achieve National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) recommendations for ARFF. Policy S-26 Hazardous Materials. Reduce the potential for exposure to humans and the environment by hazardous substances. Program S-68 Review commercial projects which use, store, or transport hazardous materials to ensure necessary measures are taken to protect public health and safety. Standard S-69 Work with CalTrans to require all transport of hazardous materials to follow CalTrans approved routes. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-49 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Program S-70 Inform residents along approved haul routes of the potential for hazard release. Airport Compatible Open Space Plan On July 21, 2004, the ALUC voted to amend the ALUP with an Airport Compatible Open Space Plan (ACOS) to address concerns that previous amendments, adopted in 2002, were too restrictive to development, and were inconsistent with the City’s General Plan goals for housing production and job creation. The ACOS establishes open spaces in the areas around the airport that can serve as reserve spaces (for aircraft emergency situations). By maintaining reserve spaces that keep certain land adjacent to the airport free and clear from obstruction or from buildings and uses where people congregate, the ACOS improves airport safety while allowing for more intense development of urban areas. The areas identified as reserve space in the ACOS include land that is close to the airport, in line with the main airport runway, or along an over-flight area where aircraft typically operate at lower altitudes. Identification of these areas in the ACOS plan adds airport safety to the list of reasons why these lands should not be developed. The ACOS provides the ability to make density adjustments within the ALUP, as shown in Table 4.11-2, that allow for increased development potential within specific Aviation Safety Areas defined in the Plan. Such adjustments are allowable if advanced levels of planning analysis are performed. The ACOS identifies two reserve spaces within the Project Site (Airport Area 1 and Airport Area 2). Although the ACOS plan, as adopted in 2004, includes a portion of the area proposed for development within the Reserve Zone (northeast corner), the City is proposing to change the boundaries of the two reserves spaces on the northern parcel of the Project Site, north of Tank Farm Road to: (1) remove the current reserve space designation from areas proposed for development by replacing that area with additional open space acreage at a 1:1 ratio, (2) to designate all of the proposed open space as reserve space, and (3) to split the Margarita Area and Airport Area 1 reserve spaces. Figure 2-25 shows the proposed changes to the ACOS plan reserve space boundaries. The proposed ACOS Amendment would be processed by the City subsequent to or concurrent with Project approval. Based on discussions with City staff, with adoption of the proposed Reserve Zone changes, and by designating the area as a Cluster Development Zone (CDZ), the Project can be developed at the proposed densities, in accordance with the requirements and density adjustments listed on Table 7 of the ALUP, consistent with the ACOS. City General Plan Safety Element The city of San Luis Obispo General Plan Safety Element includes several policies to minimize injury and loss of life, damage to public and private property, and social and economic disruptions resulting from injury, death, and property damage. Policies are included to address flooding, fire, earthquakes and other geologic hazards, hazardous materials, electromagnetic fields, airport hazards, hazardous trees, and emergency preparedness. Policies that are directly relevant to the proposed Project include: 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-50 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Hazardous Materials S 4.1: Minimizing Hazardous Materials Exposure. People’s exposure to hazardous substances should be minimized. S 4.2: Hazardous Materials in City Operations. The City should avoid using hazardous materials in its own operations to the greatest extent practical, and will follow all established health and safety practices when they are used. Airport Hazards S 6.1: Airport Land Use Plan. Development should be permitted only if it is consistent with the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan. Prospective buyers of property that is subject to airport influence should be so informed (see discussion above). A preliminary analysis of the project’s consistency with applicable hazards and hazardous material plans and polices is provided in Appendix E. 4.11.3 Significance Criteria As defined in CEQA Appendix G (VII) (the Environmental Checklist Form), a significant safety effect is one in which the proposed project “create[s] a potential health hazard or involve[s] the use, production or disposal of materials which pose a hazard to people, animal or plant populations in the area affected.” The analysis used in this report is based on the risk associated with the facility. Therefore, an impact would result in a significant impact if any of the following were to occur: Be within the amber or red regions of the Santa Barbara County Safety Criteria (see below for a discussion of these criteria), or Non-compliance with any applicable design code, regulation, NFPA standard, or generally acceptable industry practice; or For site contamination, result in mobilization of contaminants currently existing in the soil and groundwater, creating potential pathways of exposure to humans or other sensitive receptors that would result in exposure to contaminant levels that would be expected to be harmful, which is defined as an excess cancer risk of 10 in a million or an acute or chronic non-cancer risk level of 1.0.; or A transportation accident fatality risk level of one in one thousand (1.0 x 10-3) per year. For site contamination, result in the presence of contaminated soils or groundwater within the project area, and as a result, expose workers and/or the public to contaminated or hazardous materials during construction activities at levels in excess of those permitted by the Cal/OSHA in CCR Title B and OSHA in Title 29 CFR Part 1910; or Any proposed development component that would be inconsistent with ALUP policies or designated land use compatibility (see Table 4.11-2 and Figure 4.11-4). 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-51 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Santa Barbara County established a quantitative, risk-based criteria that has been utilized by various state agencies, including the California Coastal Commission and the California State Lands Commission. Santa Barbara County adopted Public Safety Thresholds in August 1999. The thresholds provide specific zones (i.e., green, amber, and red) on a risk profile curve to guide the determination of significance or insignificance based on the estimated probability and consequence of an accident. In general, risk levels in the green area would be less than significant and therefore acceptable, while risk levels in the amber and red zones would be significant. Risk profiles plot the frequency of an event against the consequence in terms of fatalities or injuries; frequent events with high consequence have the highest risk level. The Santa Barbara County quantitative risk-based criteria were used to evaluate potential fire and explosion hazards at the Project Site. 4.11.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.1 Potential health risk due to exposure to residual contamination following site remediation for future site uses. Remediation Class III A Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) was prepared in 2009, and an updated HHRA in 2013, that was based upon the process agreed upon by the SERRT during the preparation of the 2004 Baseline HHRA, with modifications generally related to incorporation of the additional characterization data, the Development Plan exposure areas, as well as relevant updates in risk assessment methodologies and toxicity factors. Therefore, the updated HHRA evaluated the potential cancer risk and noncancer hazard to future site users identified in the Development Plan from chemicals known to be present in soil, soil gas, surface water and groundwater at the Project Site, as summarized in Table 4.11-3 below. The 2009 HHRA was peer reviewed by the EIR consultants and several regulatory agencies and included a number of recommendations for additional sampling, analysis and revised risk calculations. The HHRA peer review is summarized in Section 4.11.1.2 and included numerous independent evaluations and modeling to confirm the validity of the HHRA risk estimates, as well as the sensitivity of the HHRA results to various exposure assumptions. Based on this peer review, the 2013 HHRA was prepared to address several deficiencies and include additional soil and soil gas sampling. In addition to the EIR consultant review, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Services have both submitted letters to the County explicitly stating that the revised HHRA is adequate. The complete 2013 HHRA is provided in Appendix H.1 and is summarized below. Although land use at the site is currently zoned industrial, the Development Plan land uses would include recreators (adults and children), indoor and outdoor commercial employees (adults), and intrusive workers (adults). This updated HHRA also re-examined the potential risks to off-site residents and recreators in a “no development” scenario for the site. Information regarding the types and concentrations of residual chemicals is available in the risk assessment dataset and is summarized in Appendix H.1 for the seven different exposure/development areas evaluated in this risk assessment. The chemical of potential concern (COPC) selection process included the 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-52 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR results of the soil background evaluation conducted during the preparation of the 2004 Baseline HHRA, and therefore only considered arsenic and lead as potential site soil COPCs. Exposure assumptions are generally the same as those in the 2004 Baseline HHRA and were made in accordance with current regulatory guidance (Cal/EPA 1994; USEPA 2002, 2004a and 2011a) and/or best professional judgment. Exposure pathways evaluated in the updated HHRA include incidental ingestion of soil, dermal contact with soil, inhalation of soil particles and associated vapors, inhalation of indoor air (indoor employees) and trench air vapors (intrusive workers) via subsurface contamination, and incidental ingestion of and dermal contact with surface water and shallow groundwater (intrusive workers only). With respect to exposure to soil, USEPA guidance recommends evaluating the inhalation of wind-blown dust exposure using surface soil (USEPA 1989), therefore off-site resident outdoor air COPC concentrations were modeled using soil exposure point concentrations (EPCs) calculated for the 0-2 foot depth horizon (95% upper confidence level [UCL], as the data allowed). Recreators and indoor employees are most likely to come in contact with shallow soil (for the indoor employee – indoor dust), and 95% UCL soil concentrations for the 0-2 feet below ground surface (ft bgs) horizon were used to evaluate exposure. Although outdoor employees also are most likely to have contact with shallow soil over the exposure duration of 25 years, 95% UCL soil concentrations for both the shallow and deeper (0-10 ft bgs) soil horizons were evaluated. Intrusive workers were assumed to be exposed to the maximum soil COPC concentrations up to 10 ft bgs, although trenching activities greater than 4 ft bgs fall under Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OHSA) oversight (e.g., 29 CFR 1926.651(g)(1)(i)). Maximum COPC soil gas concentrations in each development area, as available, were used as the EPCs for calculating indoor air concentrations using the Johnson & Ettinger model assuming default commercial structures (Cal/EPA 2005a and 2011), as well as default and site-specific soil information. To provide risk managers with as much information as possible, indoor air concentrations and associated risks were calculated using both shallow (5.5 ft bgs) and deeper (15 ft bgs) soil gas samples, as available, with the depth resulting in the maximum total health risk included in the totals presented in Table 4.11-3. Intrusive worker exposure to volatiles in trench air was evaluated based on shallow soil gas COPCs. Recreator, outdoor employee, and intrusive worker contact with surface water was evaluated using EPCs based on 95% UCLs or maximums, depending on the amount of data available. Contact with groundwater by intrusive workers was based on maximum concentrations. Table 4.11-3 summarizes the potential health risks to future site users identified in the Development Plan in terms of the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) and the noncarcinogenic hazard index (HI), based on current environmental conditions in the seven development/exposure areas. Table 4.11-3 identifies the risk drivers for areas where cancer risks exceed the low end of the USEPA risk management range of 1 in 1,000,000 (1x10-6) or noncancer hazards exceed the Cal/EPA and USEPA threshold of 1.0. A detailed discussion of the HHRA results follows and can be summarized as follows: Under the No Development Scenario, on-site adult and child recreator excess cancer risk would exceed acceptable levels due to elevated arsenic in soil and two elevated soil lead samples. Off-site risk would be considered acceptable. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-53 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.11-3 Summary of Potential Health Effects Associated with Development Areas Receptor (soil scenario) ILCR1 HI Site Data Considered in Evaluation2 Primary Risk Driver(s)3 Significance Level 1E-05 1.0 Site Wide/No Development Off-site Resident Adult 6E-08 0.001 Site-wide soil (0-2 ft bgs) Site-wide surface water (recreator) Recreator cancer risk is driven by arsenic in soil. Lead in two soil samples collected from 0-2 ft bgs just exceeds 1,000 mg/kg benchmark. Off-site Resident Child 0.001 Adult Recreator 2E-04 0.06 Child Recreator 0.7 Development - Open Space Adult Recreator 4E-06 0.08 Open Space soil (0-2 ft bgs) Open Space surface water Recreator cancer risk driven by PAHs in soil. Lead in two soil samples collected from 0-2 ft bgs just exceeds 1,000 mg/kg benchmark. Child Recreator 0.9 Northw est Operations Area (NWA) Indoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 3E-05 0.7 • NWA soil (0-2 ft and 0-10 ft bgs) NWA soil (0-10 ft bgs; intrusive worker) NWA soil gas No surface water features Shallow groundwater (B-34, SP-2, SLOW- 12, SLOW-18/BIV-25; intrusive worker) Indoor employee cancer risk driven by arsenic in soil and estimated benzene concentrations in indoor air. Outdoor employee cancer risk driven by arsenic in soil. Intrusive worker cancer risk driven by arsenic in soil. Outdoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 6E-05 0.1 Outdoor Employee (0-10 ft bgs) 6E-05 0.1 Intrusive Worker (0-10 ft bgs) 6E-06 0.8 Recreation/Public Facility Adult Recreator (0-2 ft bgs) 3E-07 0.01 REC soil (0-2 ft and 0-10 ft bgs) REC soil (0-10 ft bgs; intrusive worker) EDA soil gas – western most sampling locations (SG-15 to -17 and SG-25) Surface water (Surface 9) Shallow groundwater (MW-54 and TMW-5; intrusive worker) Child Recreator (0-2 ft bgs) 0.1 Indoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 2E-08 0.03 Outdoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 5E-07 0.03 Outdoor Employee (0-10 ft bgs) 5E-07 0.02 Intrusive Worker (0-10 ft bgs) 9E-09 0.02 EDA Service & Manufacturing (EDA-SM) Indoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 2E-08 0.2 • EDA soil (0-2 and 0-10 ft bgs) EDA soil gas EDA surface water (SW-1) Shallow groundwater (TMW-9; intrusive worker) Outdoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 5E-07 0.7 Outdoor Employee (0-10 ft bgs) 7E-07 0.7 Intrusive Worker (0-10 ft bgs) 5E-09 0.5 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-54 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.11-3 Summary of Potential Health Effects Associated with Development Areas Receptor (soil scenario) ILCR1 HI Site Data Considered in Evaluation2 Primary Risk Driver(s)3 Significance Level 1E-05 1.0 EDA Northern Business Park Indoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 2E-08 0.2 • EDA soil (0-2 and 0-10 ft bgs) EDA soil gas No surface water features Shallow groundwater (no COPC analytical data available – used SBP values; intrusive worker) Outdoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) ND 0.3 Outdoor Employee (0-10 ft bgs) 3E-07 0.3 Intrusive Worker (0-10 ft bgs) 2E-09 0.5 EDA Southern Business Park Indoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) 1E-08 0.1 • EDA soil (0-2 and 0-10 ft bgs) SBP soil gas No surface water features Shallow groundwater (MW-17; intrusive worker) Outdoor Employee (0-2 ft bgs) ND 0.3 Outdoor Employee (0-10 ft bgs) 3E-07 0.3 Intrusive Worker (0-10 ft bgs) 2E-09 0.4 Potentially significant risk levels, defined as an ILCR greater than 1E-05 (1.0x10-5 or 10 in one million)or an HI greater than 1.0, shown in bold font. 6E-08 = 0.00000006 = six in one hundred million ND = No carcinogenic COPCs detected 1Cancer risk is age-weighted and assumes 6 years of exposure as a child and 24 years as an adult; ILCR is the incremental probability of an individual developing cancer over a lifetime as a result of exposure to the potential carcinogen. 2Health risks from indoor air were evaluated based on both the shallow (5.5 ft bgs) and deep (15 ft bgs) results, with the highest total risk estimate reported. The highest indoor air total health risks are associated with shallow soil gas. 3Risk drivers are identified if the ILCR exceeds 1x10-6, if the HI exceeds 1.0, or if the lead EPC exceeds the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program thresholds of 400 mg/kg for childhood play areas (REC) and 1,000 mg/kg for areas where children may be present (Open Space recreation scenarios). 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-55 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Northwest Operations Area indoor employee excess cancer risk would exceed acceptable levels due to elevated arsenic in soil and estimated indoor benzene concentrations. Intrusive construction worker risk would be considered acceptable due to infrequent exposure associated with these activities. Public Recreation Facility risk would be considered acceptable under all exposure scenarios for both adults and children. Eastern Development Area risk would be acceptable under all exposure scenarios for the proposed development scenarios, including: EDA Service & Manufacturing (EDA-SM), EDA Northern Business Park, and EDA Southern Business Park. Development Open Space would be considered acceptable under all exposure scenarios for both adults and children. Under the no development scenario, total cancer risks for the off-site residents and recreational user are 6x10-8 (0.06 cancer cases per million individuals exposed) and 2x10-4 (200 cancer cases per million individuals exposed), respectively. Cancer risk for the recreational user under the no development scenario exceeds the USEPA risk management range of 1 in 1,000,000 (one in a million or 1x10-6) to 1 in 10,000 (100 in a million risk or 1x10-4), and is driven by ingestion of and dermal contact with arsenic in soil (98%). The majority of arsenic in shallow soil above the site-specific background inflection point is located within the Northwest Operations Area NWA) of the Site. The total noncancer hazards for these receptors are below the threshold value of 1.0, ranging from 0.0012 (off-site resident adult and child) to 0.7 (recreational child). Under the Development Plan, the total cancer risk for recreational use of Open Space is 4x10-6, which is heavily influenced by maximum detections of carcinogenic PAHs detected in a sample collected at 0.5 feet below the ground surface. This risk is at the low end of the USEPA and CalEPA risk management range of 10-6 to 10-4, below the California Proposition 65 significant risk level of 1 x 10-5, and within an acceptable risk range typically used for recreational and commercial receptors. . The Open Space recreational cancer risk results primarily from incidental ingestion of and dermal contact with PAHs (especially benzo[a]pyrene equivalents, BaP TEQ) in soil (80%), which was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.0048 to 5.4 mg.kg dry weight with a 95% UCL of 1.1 mg/kg dry weight. It is notable that the 95% UCL is heavily influenced by the maximum Open Space detect (S-63-0.5, located between Reservoirs 5 and 6 on the south side of Tank Farm Road; see Figure 1-6), as the next highest detection is 0.44 mg/kg dry weight. Recreational use of the Recreation/Public Facility (REC) results in a cancer risk of 3x10-7 (0.3 cancer cases per million individuals exposed, which is below the low end of the USEPA risk management range. Recreational use of a developed Site results in noncancer hazards below the threshold of 1.0, with the child values ranging from 0.1 (REC) to 0.8 (Open Space). Total cancer risks for indoor employees in default buildings range from 1x10-8 in the Eastern Development Area-Southern Business Park (EDA-SBP) to 3x10-5 in the NWA, and exceed 1x10-6 in only the NWA. In the NWA, arsenic in soil (53%) and benzene in soil gas (46%) are 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-56 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR the primary risk contributors. The total noncancer hazards for all indoor employees are below the threshold level of 1.0, ranging from 0.03 (REC) to 0.7 (NWA). Based on the 0-2 ft bgs soil exposure horizon, the total cancer risks for outdoor employees range from no carcinogenic COPC exposure (e.g., no carcinogenic COPCs detected) in the EDA Southern and Northern Business Parks (EDA-SBP and -NBP) to 6x10-5 in the NWA. When the deeper soil horizon is included in the evaluation, the total cancer risks range from 2x10-7 in the EDA-SBP and -NBP to 6x10-5 in the NWA. These outdoor employee cancer risks exceed 1x10-6 in only the NWA where arsenic in soil (96 to 99%) is the risk driver. The total noncancer hazards for all outdoor employees are below the threshold level of one, ranging from 0.03 (REC) to 0.7 EDA-SM) when shallow soil is evaluated and from 0.02 (REC) to 0.7 (EDA-SM) when 0-10 ft bgs soil is included in the risk estimates. Total cancer risks for intrusive workers range from 2x10-9 in the EDA-SBP and -NBP to 6 x 10-6 in the NWA, and exceed 1 x 10-6 in only the NWA where arsenic in soil (96%) is the cancer risk driver. The total noncancer hazards for all intrusive workers are below the threshold level of one, ranging from 0.02 (REC) to 0.8 (NWA). In exposure/development areas where lead was carried forward as a COPC, the potential for lead-related health effects was evaluated by comparing the exposure/development area EPC to Cal/EPA’s commercial lead soil CHHSL (Cal/EPA 2009d) and/or a “recreational-equivalent” lead soil CHHSL; no CHHSL exceedances occurred. To address SLO County EHS concerns with respect to the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program, comparisons were made to the 400 mg/kg threshold for childhood play areas and the 1,000 mg/kg threshold for areas where children may be present. Only two shallow soil samples just exceed the 1,000 mg/kg threshold T-8-0.5 [1,151 mg/kg] and T-10-0.5 [1,001 mg/kg]). Both of these samples were collected from tank rings in the northwest portion of the Site, which are located in the Open Space of the Development Plan. In the REC, the maximum lead concentration is 50 mg/kg, which is well below the 400 mg/kg benchmark. Major uncertainties that may have resulted in an overestimation of risk in this HHRA are (1) the use of maximum soil concentrations, as opposed to 95% UCLs, for some COPCs in some development areas, (2) modeling surface water exposures based on full body immersion, and (3) assuming all extractable TPH (C10-C40) detected in surface water and groundwater is truly dissolved TPH-diesel and comprised entirely of the more toxic aromatic fraction. Multiple uses by a single receptor would result in an underestimation of risk; for example, risks to off-site residents who also recreate at the Site are best characterized by the recreational user risk results. Major assumptions and conclusions reached in this updated HHRA include the following: Health risks were evaluated based on current environmental conditions and land uses identified in the Development Plan, which includes commercial use of specific development areas and recreational use of Open Space and a Recreation/Public Facility. If the Site changes dramatically due to a catastrophic event (e.g., natural disaster such as an earthquake), or development plans become inconsistent with land uses and default structures evaluated in this risk assessment, additional evaluation of potential health risks may be necessary. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-57 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR This risk assessment follows the process established during the preparation of the 2004 Baseline HHRA, with modifications generally related to incorporation of requested additional characterization data, the Development Plan exposure areas, and updates in risk assessment methodologies and toxicity factors. As in the 2004 Baseline HHRA, this updated risk assessment does not quantitatively evaluate potential exposure to surface hydrocarbon expressions at the Site. The health risks associated with exposure to weathered hardened asphaltic debris was determined to be minimal given the low toxicity of asphalt. Although semi-fluid tar contains elevated levels of PAHs that could represent a health hazard, the 2004 Baseline HHRA recommended that people using the Site should avoid contact with the surface tar that is pliable. Surface water features at the Site are ephemeral, shallow, and would best be characterized as an attractive nuisance. Recreator, outdoor employee, and intrusive worker exposures assume that these features are swimmable, and therefore likely result in an overestimation of associated risk. Estimated cancer risks exceed low end of the USEPA risk management range (1x10-6) for Site-wide (no development) recreational use, all receptors in the NWA, and recreational use of Open Space at a developed site. Under the site-wide no development recreational scenario, the majority of the cancer risk results from ingestion of and dermal contact with arsenic in soil, which is located primarily within the NWA. In the NWA, cancer risks for outdoor employees and intrusive workers also result almost exclusively from direct contact with arsenic in soil. For indoor employees, ingestion of arsenic in indoor dust and benzene in indoor air are the primary cancer risk drivers. In Open Space, recreational exposure to PAHs as BaP TEQ) in soil is the primary risk driver, with most of this exposure associated with the maximum detection on the southern side of the site (S-63-0.5). Estimated cancer risks are below 1x10-6 (an excess cancer risk of one in a million risk) for all other receptors – off-site residents (no development), recreational use of the REC area, and all commercial/intrusive worker activities in the REC and EDA Service and Manufacturing area and Northern and Southern Business Parks. Estimated total noncancer hazards are below 1.0 for all receptors. None of the exposure/development area lead EPCs exceeded the commercial or recreational-equivalent” CHHSLs. Methane in soil gas exceeds the 10% lower explosive limit (LEL) in both the NWA and EDA, primarily due to natural methane formation in wetland areas. The HHRA did not address potential health risks associated with the active remediation of the site. Off-site public exposure during remediation activities would be very short-term in nature, thus minimizing long-term health risks. The main driver in off-site health risk associated with site remediation would result from exposure to diesel particulate emissions from remediation activities and truck transportation. Potential health risks associated with off-site exposure to diesel particulate emissions were evaluated in Section 4.1.4, Impact AQ.1, and were found to be less than significant with mitigation. In the absence of site development, potential health risks were found to be potentially significant for individuals that would use the vacant Project Site for recreation. However, potential off-site 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-58 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR health risks at neighboring properties would be considered less than significant (see Table 4.11- 3). Since the undeveloped site would not be made available for active recreation under a site- wide/no development scenario, these potentially significant health risks to recreators would not be realized. However, under the Development - Open Space scenario, potential health risk to recreators would be considered less than significant. In addition, the Project would include building pad construction and capping of these areas of potential exposure. Therefore, potential health risk associated with the remediated site would be considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures HM-1 Prior to issuance of grading or other related permits authorizing initiation of the remediation and restoration component of the project, the Applicant shall submit to the City and County written verification from the RWQCB that the Remedial Action Plan has been finalized and approved. Residual Impacts Potential health risks associated with exposure to residual contamination are considered less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.2 Public accident risk associated with truck traffic during site remediation. Remediation Class III Most hydrocarbon-affected soils would be disposed of at the Non-hazardous Hydrocarbon- Impacted Soil (NHIS) facility at the City of Santa Maria Landfill. Use of NHIS by the Santa Maria Landfill as cover material is consistent with the requirements included in Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations and has been approved by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board RWQCB). NHIS material includes, but is not limited to, soils from oil field sumps, tank farms, pipeline leaks, or petroleum product spills. The Santa Maria Landfill has an NHIS program addressing the types and monitoring of the NHIS received at the landfill that the project would comply with. The proposed truck route for transporting petroleum-containing soil and demolition debris from the Project Site is as follows: Westbound on Tank Farm Road; Southbound on South Higuera Street; Either westbound on Los Osos Valley Road to the Highway 101 on-ramps or continue south to the South Higuera Highway 101 on ramps; Southbound Highway 101, trucks would exit at Betteravia Road in Santa Maria, travel east on Betteravia Road to Philbric Road, then north on Philbric Road to the City of Santa Maria Landfill entrance. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-59 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR An alternate route would include the following: East on Tank Farm Road; Southbound on Highway 227; Westbound on Price Canyon Road; South on Price Street to the southbound Highway 101 onramp. The route from Highway 101 to the City of Santa Maria Landfill would be same. The route would be the same in reverse for inbound trucks. The Applicant estimates that 10,500 truck trips (round trips) would be necessary to transport the NHIS to the Santa Maria Landfill. Hours of work are planned to occur as feasible pre-dawn and during daylight hours, Monday through Friday all year round. Figure 2-13 shows the truck routes between the site and Highway 101. The material would be used at the landfill as cover for closing landfill cells. The materials to be transported would be tested to ensure it meets the Santa Maria Landfill’s specifications for NHIS. Any material that does not meet the NHIS specifications will be separated and handled appropriately. Soil that does not meet the NHIS criteria will be sent to another licensed facility able to accept hydrocarbon-affected soil, to either Clean Harbor’s Class I disposal facility in Buttonwillow, California or the Chemical Waste Management Class I disposal facility in Kettleman Hills, California. The truck route to the Buttonwillow facility would include the following: Access Northbound Highway 101 either via Los Osos Valley Road as described above or via the Prado Road on-ramp; Highway 101 northbound; East on Highway 46; South on Highway 33; and, East on Lokern Road to the landfill entrance. The designated highway route to CWM Kettleman Hills Landfill would be as follows: Highway 101 northbound; East on Highway 46; and, Northeast on Highway 41 to the landfill entrance. The Applicant requested that disposal of up to one-third, or 50,000 cubic yards entailing approximately 3,500 round trips, of the soil at either of these two locations be evaluated by the EIR as a contingency plan. Truck trips would be generated off-site by the transportation of contaminated and hydrocarbon affected soils and demolition materials. Total export of affected materials is estimated at 157,000 cubic yards, or approximately 10,500 truck trips (round trips). Given the uncertainty with estimating the amount of affected soil from remediation projects, the Applicant has request that the EIR include a 25% contingency. This contingency would increase the total exported affected material to 196,250 cubic yards, or approximately 13,125 truck trips (round trips). Total import of fill materials is estimated to be 82,000 cubic yards, and 5,467 truck trips (round trips). 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-60 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Estimated total round trips and peak day trips for the remediation project are summarized in Table 2-6 (ATE 2007). The Applicant schedule indicates that grading and remediation would take 2.5 years until completion. All grading and remediation would occur in advance of the development phases of the proposed Project. Transportation hazards are related to those components of a project where there is the possibility of a traffic accident resulting from the increased level of traffic on the local area roadways due to the project. This traffic increase would be primarily associated with increases in traffic associated with truck transportation of NHIS to the Santa Maria Landfill and material not meeting the NHIS criteria needing to be transported to Kettleman Hills or Buttonwillow. Employee commuter traffic is generally not considered because it is assumed that these trips would be located on area roadways for other, unrelated employment projects if the proposed Project did not go forward. The County and City Safety Element do not specifically address the significance criteria associated with traffic accidents. However, significance criteria have been developed based on the risk level deemed acceptable in the Santa Barbara County Safety Element. The DOT (DOT 2003) maintains data on the rate of fatal truck accidents on a nationwide basis. This data was utilized to generate an estimate of the frequency of fatalities. Information related to the details of the project is utilized to estimate the annual number of miles traveled by all trucks carrying NHIS. These are then compared to the threshold criteria for fatality frequency to determine significance. The large number of truck trips associated with this Project has the potential to produce a significant impact to public safety due to the number of trucks on the roads. The Avila Beach and Guadalupe remediation projects generated a large number of truck trips, and the only areas that produced safety issues associated with those projects were trucking related. For example, the Guadalupe Remediation Project included up to 860,000 truck-miles annually for two years during the course of the project. As shown in Table 4.11-4, annual average truck mileage would be 189,000 or 381,500 for the Santa Maria or Kettleman Hills/Buttonwillow destinations, respectively. Based on the DOT truck fatality rate of 2.5x10-9 fatalities/mile-year, the project risks would be less than 1x10-3 fatal accidents per year (see table 4.11-4). Therefore, potential truck accident risk would be considered less than significant. Table 4.11.4 Truck Transport Fatality Frequency – Proposed Project Element Santa Maria Landfill Kettleman Hills/ Buttonwillow Annual Average Trips 5,250 3,500 Miles per Trip 36 109 Total Annual Miles 189,000 381,500 Fatality Frequency without mitigation 4.73E-04 9.54E-04 Significance Threshold 1.00E-03 1.00E-03 Significant with mitigation? No No Note: Based on DOT base truck fatality rate with corrections of 2.5x10-9 fatalities per mile-year. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-61 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Residual Impacts Potential hazards associated with truck transportation of petroleum-containing soil and demolition debris are considered less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.3 Asbestos exposure risk during site remediation activities. Remediation Class II Asbestos is a term used for several types of naturally occurring silicate minerals that occur as asbestiform fibers that are a human health hazard when airborne. Asbestos is a known carcinogen and inhalation may result in the development of lung cancer or mesothelioma, and was commonly used as an insulation material. Chrysotile and amphibole asbestos are common to geologic settings in California. Serpentinite may contain chrysotile asbestos, especially near fault zones. Ultramafic rock, a rock closely related to serpentinite, may also contain asbestos minerals. Asbestos was identified as a toxic air contaminant by the California Air Resources Board CARB) in 1986. Four buildings at the Project Site in the Northwest Operations Area are proposed to be demolished during remediation. Three of these buildings were constructed to support former operations at the Project Site, but are now primarily vacant office space. The fourth, a modular building adjacent to the northernmost original building, was constructed within the last eight years to provide additional office space. Given the age of the three older buildings, the Applicant is assuming that lead-containing materials and asbestos-containing materials are present. Consequently, surveys and abatement would precede physical demolition of the buildings. A California-licensed Asbestos Consultant and California-certified Lead Consultant, respectively, would conduct asbestos and lead-based paint surveys for each building. Positive surveys would require abatement. Prior to abatement, a National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants demolition notification form, asbestos survey report, and an asbestos abatement work plan would be submitted to the San Luis Obispo County APCD. Asbestos-containing materials would be abated in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Any suspect material found during abatement and not previously identified would be presumed asbestos-containing materials unless contradicted by specific laboratory data. Asbestos-containing materials would be properly wrapped, placed in covered roll-off bins, and disposed of at a licensed disposal facility (e.g., Kettleman Hills). The Flower Mound is an area on and off of the Project Site proposed by the Applicant to be used as a borrow site due to its available rock material for backfill of excavation areas and so the elevation of the Flower Mound can be lowered to allow for the Santa Fe Road extension to go through that area as proposed. The Flower Mound area is approximately 17.3 acres in and extending off of the northeast corner of the Project Site within OU #3, which is approximately 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-62 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 55.1 acres. It is an outcrop of the basement bedrock complex known as the Franciscan Formation. The Franciscan Formation is a chaotic mixture of fault blocks and slices of graywacke, shale and greenstone with subordinate chert, conglomerate, serpentinite, diabasegabbro, and blueschist metamorphic rocks set in a sheared and shaly matrix; a tectonic unit. Serpentinite and ultramafic rocks release asbestos when crushed or broken. Asbestos can be released to the atmosphere due to construction and grading projects, quarry activity, traffic on unpaved roads, etc. Natural weathering and erosion processes can also act on asbestos-bearing rock and make it easier for asbestos fibers to become airborne if such rock is disturbed. The Applicant is proposing to excavate 350,000 cubic yards of material from this location. Due to the composition of the rock, the Applicant is proposing to do so by blasting with directed explosive charges. It is uncertain how much of the Flower Mound excavation will require blasting. Processing of the blasted materials would include crushing with a rock crushing machine, and may include sorting with loaders, stationary static sorting screens, and possibly washing, depending upon what materials are required by the Project. Material produced from the Flower Mound would be crushed and screened to meet project materials specifications. Under the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at a site, a geologic analysis is necessary to determine if serpentine rock is present. Grading projects larger than 1 acre in serpentine rock would require prior APCD approval of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program. Padre Associates conducted a Geologic Evaluation of Naturally Occurring Asbestos and Material Durability Assessment for the Project Site. Asbestos was not found above the analytical detection limit of 0.25% in any of the rock or soil samples submitted for microscopic analysis by CARB Method 435. However, the microscopic analyses indicated that several rock core samples contained trace concentrations of chrysotile (serpentinite) asbestos, but could not be quantified due to the method quantification criteria. The findings of the microscopic analyses and field observations will be utilized in the development of a dust mitigation plan associated with proposed future grading activities at the Project Site. As such impacts from asbestos exposure could be significant. Mitigation Measures Implement Mitigation Measures AQ-1b and AQ-1c. Residual Impacts Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ.1-8 and AQ.1-9 would substantially reduce the potential exposure to asbestos to a level that is considered less than significant with mitigation Class II). 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-63 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.4 Increased aircraft wildlife strike risk due to wetland restoration within the airport Runway Protection Zone and Safety Areas. Remediation Class I Remediation would require soil excavation and associated ground disturbance within four Operational Units (OU) identified in the Project Execution Plan (CEMC 2007). This would result in loss of wetlands. An updated delineation of wetland resources at the Project Site was completed by Padre and WSP (Padre 2008b). The more recent delineation determined that there were 49 acres of Federal wetlands, 3.4 acres of “one-parameter” wetlands, and 3.9 acres falling under the category of Other Waters of the U.S. The proposed remediation and restoration efforts would result in direct impacts to 27.22 acres of Waters of the U.S. including federal wetland areas. In addition, accidental spills and sediment and erosion from remediation areas could flow into sensitive wetland habitats causing indirect impacts. The proposed conceptual restoration approach was documented in the report by Padre and WSP titled “Landscape Restoration for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm 75% Basis of Design Report” (Padre 2009). The report presents a landscape-level design at the 75% level of completion for the wetland habitat and special status species affected by the Project. As detailed in the 75% draft restoration plan (Table 1), of the 31.8 acres of vernal pool fairy shrimp (VPFS) habitat at the Project Site, approximately 10.34 acres would be impacted by remediation and restoration activities. The most recent survey results conducted by Padre (spring 2012) updates the extent of occupied habitat which would result in a total of 12.9 acres of VPFS habitat being impacted by project remediation and restoration. As described in the 75% draft restoration Plan, impacts to VPFS habitat would be mitigated by restoring vernal depressions, as well as creating vernal swale habitats within the upland ecosystems and remediated reservoirs. Repopulation of newly created or restored pools would be stimulated by inoculation, consisting of material collected from topsoil of impacted occupied VPFS habitat or, if needed, gathered from “donor” pools unaffected by remediation. Mitigation measure BIO-1c requires the preparation of a final restoration plan that shall provide for a 1:1 replacement of all VPFS habitat impacted by remediation efforts (or at least 14.78 acres of VPFS habitat depending on final disturbance acreages). In addition, the implementation of the restoration plan would result in a 1:1 replacement ratio of restored wetlands to wetlands lost due to Project disturbances. The EIR-proposed mitigation (BIO-4a) requires a 1:1 habitat replacement. Mitigation Measure BIO-8d requires a 2:1 replacement for wetlands (3.71 acres) that would be permanently lost due to the development project. This would serve to increase the overall amount of wetland at the project site by 3.71 acres. Proposed restoration activities are designed to improve the value and function of the existing on- site wetlands (Padre and WSP 2009). As detailed in the Conceptual Restoration Plan and clarified in Padre 2013c, the proposed remediation and restoration activities would impact a total of 29.04 acres of federal wetland habitat. The Applicant would obtain a Section 404 permit prior to disturbance of wetland areas. Consultation with the USFWS and National Marine Fisheries 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-64 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Service (NMFS) would be completed during the Section 404 permitting process. The Applicant would comply with all measures issued by USFWS and NMFS for the Project. The potentially significant impact to wetlands would be mitigated with the proposed mitigation of 1:1 habitat replacement (MM BIO-3b). In addition, with the re-establishment of normal water flow throughout the site, other additional degraded wetlands could recover and provide additional habitat functions. Padre reports that an additional 11.37 acres of degraded habitat would recover naturally with the return of historical water connectivity (Padre and WSP 2009). The natural recovery of degraded wetlands, combined with mitigation measures, particularly restoration of on-site, existing wetlands, would result in a potential increase in the quantity and quality of wetland habitat, and could result in an increase in the bird population in the immediate vicinity of the SLOCRA. Since the remediation phase of the project would result in an increase in habitat, and a potential increase in the local bird population associated with wetlands (see Section 4.2.4 Biological Resources for more details), the Project could significantly increase bird strike hazards at the SLOCRA. Mitigation Measures HM-4 The applicant shall limit the on-site wetland replacement to a ratio of 1:1 for a total on-site wetland restoration of 46.64 acres (42.93 acres for remediation and 3.71 acres for development area). Residual Impacts Limiting wetland restoration following remediation to the same acreage as currently exists would prevent a measurable increase in local bird populations. Minimizing wetlands and local bird populations in the Runway Protection Zone and Safety Area S-1 would prevent a project-related increase in wetland habitat and local bird populations. The Applicant originally proposed replacing wetland impacted by the Remediation Phase of the Project at a 1.7 to 1 ratio. The biological resources section of the EIR has a mitigation measure that would require offsetting the Remediation Project impacts to wetland at a ratio of 1 to 1. However, even at the 1 to 1 replacement ratio, the restoration activities would improve the value and functions of the wetlands, which could make them more attractive to birds. In addition, with the re-establishment of normal water flow throughout the site, other additional degraded wetlands could recover and provide additional habitat functions. The natural recovery of degraded wetlands, combined with mitigation measures, particularly restoration of on-site, existing wetlands, would result in a potential increase in the quantity and quality of wetland habitat and therefore possibly increase bird populations. Therefore, the impact associated with bird strike risk has remained significant and unavoidable (Class I). 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-65 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.5 Potential aircraft safety hazards due to changes in topography of the project site. Remediation Class IV The remediation and restoration would result in some minor changes to the overall site topography. However, these changes would not represent a potential aircraft safety hazard. The Applicant proposes to make a number of modifications to Reservoir 2 to improve airport safety by addressing concerns raised by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). Reservoir 2 was a 600-foot diameter crude oil storage reservoir constructed by Union Oil of California in 1910. The reservoir had concrete walls and a wooden roof and was surrounded by a roughly trapezoidal berm approximately 15 feet high and 150 feet wide at its base for secondary containment. The 1926 fire damaged the reservoir and left an asphalt layer over the berm slopes and concrete floor. The reservoir was never rebuilt. In later decades the SLOCRA was constructed to the southeast of the Project Site. The main runway alignment intersects the reservoir, which is now a significant feature within the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). The ALUC identified this feature as a safety concern if an aircraft had to make an emergency landing within the RPZ. As part of site work activities, the Applicant is proposing to cut the wall and grade the berm to a more gentle topography. The standing portions of wall, approximately 12 feet high, would be cut approximately two feet above the ground and laid flat on the adjacent concrete floor. The asphaltic material, which may impede plant growth if left on the surface, would be scraped from the berm surface and placed against the outer side of the wall. The berm material would be graded to flatten the slopes while providing at least two feet of soil cover above the concrete wall. The finished surface would be scarified, except at the access roads, to promote re- vegetation and would be restored as part of the restoration program. The berm height would be lowered between four and eight feet, depending upon the surrounding topography. This would reduce slope grades from approximately 50 percent to between 5 and 12 percent. The direction of slope and slope breaks would be positioned to ensure that the interior wetlands capture at least the same amount of rainwater as the existing condition. The broad flat slope created on the west side of the reservoir would facilitate access by large emergency vehicles. In addition, compacted gravel all-weather roads designed per applicable CALFIRE requirements would provide permanent access to the interior of the former reservoir and to existing trails serving the runway light system. The existing paved pad would be retained for future use as an emergency staging area. Any gates to this area would be set back from Tank Farm Road to allow emergency vehicles to pull off of the road while gaining access to the site. This change in topography at the site would be considered a beneficial impact to aircraft safety in the event an aircraft had to make an emergency landing within the RPZ. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-66 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts The proposed modifications to Reservoir 2 would serve to improve aircraft safety in the event an aircraft has to make an emergency landing in the RPZ. Therefore, residual impacts of this component of the Project would be beneficial (Class IV). 4.11.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The City Development Plan component of the Project would include permanent conversion of the Project Site to commercial and recreational uses, as well as open space. All of the impacts described above for the proposed remediation would be identical to the City Development Plan impacts, since remediation activities are a necessary predecessor to future development. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.6 Potential health risk from exposure to residual contamination following site cleanup and development. Development Class II In most cases, the potential health risks associated with exposure to residual contamination following remediation activities would be considered acceptable and less than significant (see Table 4.11-3). Potential health risk for the various development areas include: Northwest Operations Area (NWA) indoor employee excess cancer risk would exceed acceptable levels due to elevated arsenic in soil and estimated indoor benzene concentrations. Intrusive construction worker risk would be considered acceptable due to infrequent exposure associated with these activities. Methane in soil gas exceeds the 10% lower explosive limit (LEL) in both the NWA and EDA. Methane was indicated in 15 of the 16 soil gas samples (including duplicates) collected in the Reservoir 4 area. Two of these soil gas samples were indicated at concentrations above 10% of the LEL, and three of the soil gas samples were indicated at concentrations within or above the explosive range for methane. Since these areas are proposed for development, high soil gas methane levels could result in high levels within confined spaces and pose a significant fire and explosion risk to building inhabitants. Public Recreation Facility risk would be considered acceptable under all exposure scenarios for both adults and children. Eastern Development Area risk would be acceptable under all exposure scenarios for the proposed development scenarios, including: EDA Service & Manufacturing (EDA-SM), EDA Northern Business Park, and EDA Southern Business Park. Development Open Space would be considered acceptable under all exposure scenarios for both adults and children. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-67 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Applicant Proposed Controls The Applicant has proposed several measures to address potentially significant health risks in the NWA in order to prevent human and ecological exposure as summarized below. Area of Concern #1 – Groundwater The remedial action objectives for OU #1 and AOC #1 established in the Feasibility Study intend to prevent human contact with TPH- or benzene-affected groundwater and ensure that groundwater resources down-gradient of existing impacts are not affected. Therefore, the Applicant proposed remedial method for AOC #1 is monitored natural attenuation with institutional controls and long-term monitoring on-site and off-site. Monitored natural attenuation includes regular sampling of the existing groundwater monitoring network on and surrounding AOC #1; chemical analyses on collected samples; and reporting findings to the RWQCB in accordance with an approved monitoring and reporting program. The Applicant is also proposing institutional controls that would include deed restrictions limiting on-site land use to commercial and industrial purposes, a soil management plan implemented in the event contaminated soils are disturbed, and groundwater use restrictions in affected areas. Area of Concern #2 – Soil Area of Concern #2 includes shallow soil, which is contaminated with arsenic and, to a more limited extent, by TPH and PAH, and deeper (4 to 28 feet bgs) soil affected by LNAPL containing a light fraction. The arsenic is relatively widespread and limited to shallow (less than 2 feet) soil, which is consistent with its probable former use at the Project Site as an herbicide. The arsenic and PAH have been identified as potential threats to human and ecological receptors if the area were converted to open space). With regard to the deeper soil, the LNAPL was not considered by the Applicant to be a direct contact risk, but vapor intrusion by the volatile fraction may pose a risk to future on-site commercial workers. Remedial action objectives were primarily focused on preventing human and ecological receptor contact with arsenic, TPH, PAH, and volatile hydrocarbons. Since the area is proposed to be developed, it is not proposed to support suitable ecological habitat. The Applicant-proposed remedy for OU #1 and AOC #2 includes constructing a soil cap, a minimum of 4 feet in thickness. The cap would provide a barrier between the affected soil and potential receptors and also provide a soil layer of sufficient thickness to facilitate foundation construction and utility installation. A geotextile, placed between the cap and the existing ground surface, is intended by the Applicant to act as an identifying marker to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently excavating into the affected soils. Residual Health Risk The proposed soil cap would require long-term monitoring and maintenance. Institutional controls would include deed restrictions limiting land use to commercial and industrial purposes; excavation notification requirements; a soil management plan; groundwater use restrictions in affected areas; and a vapor barrier requirement for any new buildings constructed in the OU, which would protect the building occupants from possible vapors from the underlying hydrocarbons. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-68 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Chronic health risks for intrusive workers was considered less than significant due to limited exposure duration (see Table 4.11-4). However, during construction activities, such as trenching for utilities and foundations, there is some potential for short-term acute exposure to workers and damage to the containment cap. The Applicant has proposed a soil cap of at least 4 feet in thickness, which is sufficient for utility installation. Trenching depths up to 10 feet could occur in some areas, but not in the areas that will utilize a soil cap. However, it is possible that intrusive workers could over-excavate in the area of the soil cap, resulting in potential acute exposure to residual contamination. Mitigation Measures The Applicant-proposed mitigation of a cap, vapor barriers for buildings and institutional controls are sufficient to reduce potential health risks and subsurface methane hazards to acceptable levels for most development scenarios. However, excessive trenching could result in short-term acute exposure to workers. Therefore, the following mitigation measure is required: HM-6 Prior to recordation of applicable tract map, the Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels identifying specific limits on trenching activities and procedures for conducting subsurface construction activities. The Applicant shall maintain responsibility for air quality monitoring during any subsurface excavation activities. Residual Impacts Potential hazards associated with residual contamination that would remain following remediation of the site, and implementation of subsurface excavation controls and air quality monitoring, would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.7 Potential public risk associated with development within the SLOCRA safety areas. Development Class III The Project would result in an increase in the working and recreational population in the immediate vicinity of the airport, and within ALUP/SLOCRA Safety Area S-1 (and Subareas S- 1a, S-1b and S-1c) and Airport Compatibility Open Space Plan (ACOS) Reserve Areas 1 and 2. The ACOS establishes open spaces in the areas around the airport that can serve as reserve spaces. Reserve space improves airport safety by allowing for more intense development of urban areas, while keeping certain land adjacent to the airport free and clear from obstruction or from buildings and uses where people congregate. The areas identified as reserve space in the ACOS include land that is close to the airport, in line with the main airport runway, or along an over-flight area where aircraft typically operate at lower altitudes. Identification of these areas in the ACOS plan simply adds airport safety to the list of reasons why these lands, including portions of the Project Site, should not be developed. The ACOS identifies two reserve spaces that partially overlap with the Project Site (Airport Area 1 and Airport Area 2). The Airport Area 1 reserve space is connected to Margarita Area reserve space. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-69 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The City is proposing to change the boundaries of the two reserves spaces on the Project Site to: 1) reconfigure the existing reserve spaces on the northern and southern parcels of the Project Site so that they do not overlap with the City Development Plan footprint (excluding the area proposed to be designated Public Facility and used as a ball field complex), (2) reconfigure the existing reserve spaces on the northern and southern parcels to fully coincide with the proposed open space areas (excluding the area proposed to be designated Public Facility and used as a ball field complex), and (3) to split the Margarita Area and Airport Area 1 reserve spaces in a manner so that the Margarita Area reserve space is no longer part of the Project Site. Figure 2-26 shows the proposed changes to the ACOS reserve space boundaries. The proposed changes in the Reserve Area boundaries would result in open space being the primary land use within the Runway Protection Zone and Safety Area S-1a, with some of the reserve space being in Safety Area S-1b and S-1c. The proposed ACOS Amendment would be processed by the City subsequent to or concurrent with consideration of the Project. The City is also proposing to change the boundaries of the Cluster Development Zone (CDZ) in the AASP to eliminate some of the property to the southeast, which has already been developed under a County permit. The CDZ modifications would processed by the City subsequent to or concurrent with Project approval as part of the changes to the AASP. Figure 2-24 shows the proposed new boundaries of the CDZ. Table 4.11-4 shows the breakdown of zoning within the modified CDZ. Table 4.11-4 Zoning Breakdown of CDZ Area Zoning Acres Business Park 131.4 Manufacturing/Service/Commercial 329.0 Medium Density Residential 7.0 Open Space 263.4 Non-Airport Public Facility 15.1 Total 745.8 Open Space 35.31 The ALUP requires that 35 percent of the gross CDZ area be set aside as reserve space, not including property zoned as Public Facility for airport use. However, in the AASP, which was approved by the Airport Land Use Commission, a requirement that 35 percent of the gross CDZ area be set aside as open space not including property zoned as Public Facility for airport use. The data in Table 4.11-4 shows that the proposed modifications to the CDZ would meet the 35 percent open space requirement that was used in the approved AASP, and therefore it would qualify for the CDZ density adjustments specified in the ALUP. A conceptual site plan prepared by the Cal Ripken Baseball Association has been submitted to the Applicant (see Figure 2-19). The proposed ballfield project area would be rezoned as a part of the Project with implementation to be completed by Cal Ripkin at a future date. The Applicant’s involvement with the Cal Ripken project is limited to donation of the property. The area would be comprised of up to three baseball fields and amenities that may include the following characteristics: 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-70 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR A 147,500 ft2 championship baseball field with sports lighting, scoreboard, built in terrace seating, and bleachers; A 104,500 ft2 baseball field with lighting, scoreboard, bleachers, and scorekeepers booth; A 108,000 ft2 flexible use field (Baseball and Softball) with scoreboard, bleachers, and scorekeepers booth; Batting cages totaling 3,500 ft2; Restrooms, a plaza, and a playground totaling 17,000 ft2; Parking area totaling 45,000 ft2; and Open grass areas for team warm up, general use, picnic tables, and benches totaling 236,580 ft2. As shown in Figure 2-26, the baseball field complex would be partially within the Runway Protection Zone, with the remainder of the complex falling in Safety Area S-1b. The SLOCRA ALUP allows for outdoor sports and recreation within the Runway Protection Zone, but prohibits structures that could interfere with aircraft navigation and safety, while some structures are allowed in Safety Area S-1b. The FAA has reviewed the facility and issued determinations of No Hazard to Air Navigation” for each structure in the ball field complex. Since the SLOCRA ALUP allows for this type of land use, the average non-residential population densities would be within the ALUP guidance, and the FAA has determined that facility structures would not pose a hazard to air navigation, the baseball field complex would not pose a significant risk to airport safety or users of the baseball field complex. The proposed Project would have development with Safety Areas S-1b, S-1c. The project would be developed with an approved ACOS and CDZ specified in an approved Detailed Area Plan the AASP). This would allow non-residential densities of 50 persons per acre in S-1b and 120 persons per acre in S-1c (see Table 4.11-2). Table 4.11-5 provides a breakdown of the density calculations for the proposed development. The data in Table 4.11-5 shows that the proposed Project would be well below the allowable population densities in the ALUP. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the proposed Project are considered less than significant (Class III). Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Residual Impacts The potential risk associated with development within the ALUP/SLOCRA RPZ and Safety Area S-1 is considered less than significant (Class III). 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-71 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.11-5 Population Density Calculations for City Development Plan Land Use Type Zoning Population in Each Safety Zone RP Zone SA S-1a SA S-1b SA S-1c Total Light Manufacturing S-C 0 0 585 265 850 Industrial Research and Development S-C 0 0 172 78 250 Business Park (Offices) BP 0 0 1,563 1,917 3,480 General Retail S-C 0 0 0 50 50 Vehicle Services -Repair and Maintenance-Major S-C 0 0 100 0 100 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animal S-C 0 0 25 0 25 Photo and Film Processing Lab S-C 0 0 50 0 50 Printing and Publishing BP 0 0 50 0 50 Warehousing, Indoor Storage S-C 0 0 34 16 50 Wholesaling and Distribution S-C 0 0 115 52 167 Hotel (115 rooms) BP 0 0 0 549 549 Specialized Education/Training Facility BP 0 0 111 0 111 Public Transit Maintenance and Storage Facility PF 0 0 50 0 50 Public Fire Station and Training Facility PF 0 0 25 0 25 Total Population 0 0 2,881 2,926 5,806 Population Density (persons per acre based on gross area) 0 0 9 9 Allowable Population Density 5 40 50 120 Maximum Building Coverage (% gross area) 0 0 2.4% 2.0% Allowable Building Coverage (% gross area) 0 n/a n/a n/a 1. Population density and gross area are based upon acreage of entire development project including the open space. 2. Allowable population density is based upon data in Table 7 of the ALUP for CDZ specified by approved ACOS and DAP for non-residential in SA S-1c, and for approved ACOS in SA S-1b. 3. Assumes half of the building square footage is made up of two story buildings in the calculation of maximum building coverage. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.8 Potential risk associated with the future use of acutely hazardous materials in the SLOCRA safety areas. Development Class II Businesses associated with the future development scenario could potentially utilize chemical substances that are defined as Acutely Hazardous Materials (AHM). California Health and Safety Code §2770.5, California Accidental Release Program (CalARP) List of Substances, and California Code of Regulations §5189, Process Safety Management of Acutely Hazardous Materials identify AHMs and reportable quantities. The storage of large quantities of AHMs in SLOCRA Safety Area S-1 would have the potential to result in a significant accidental release in the event of an aircraft strike. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-72 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Aviation risk management identifies areas of significant aviation hazard. The Airport Land Use Commission has determined that the considerations of primary importance in this determination are: a. The flight paths most heavily utilized by aircraft departing from or approaching to land at the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport – Flight paths utilized by a relatively high proportion of arriving or departing aircraft are associated with an increased accident risk. b. The flight paths utilized by aircraft departing from or approaching to land at the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport during adverse weather conditions – Maintaining control of an aircraft in conditions that make visualization of the horizon and the ground impossible is one of the most challenging tasks that a pilot can face. Flight paths which have been designated by the Federal Aviation Administration for use during reduced-visibility conditions, therefore, are of significant concern to the ALUC. c. The anticipated altitude of aircraft operations – A critical operational element in ensuring the safety of persons and property on the ground is the ability of the pilot of a disabled airplane to avoid impact with inhabited structures. The likelihood of the pilot accomplishing this is directly related to the time and gliding distance available, and both of these are dependent on the aircraft’s altitude at the time a malfunction occurs. Consideration of the factors discussed above has lead to the delineation of three fundamental areas with respect to aviation safety risks: a. Runway Protection Zones – Areas immediately adjacent to the ends of each active runway, within which the level of aviation safety risk is very high and in which, consequently, structures are prohibited and human activities are restricted to those which require only very low levels of occupancy. The size and configuration of the Runway Protection Zones are specified by Federal Aviation Regulations. The Runway Protection Zones are also referred to as the “clear zones” for each runway. b. Safety Area S-1 – The area within the vicinity of which aircraft operate frequently or in conditions of reduced visibility at altitudes 500 feet above ground level (AGL). c. Safety Area S-2 – The area within the vicinity of which aircraft operate frequently or in conditions of reduced visibility at altitudes between 501 and 1000 feet above ground level AGL). Aviation safety hazards to be considered in this area include mechanical failures, fuel exhaustion, loss of control during turns from downwind to base legs or from base to final legs of the traffic pattern, stall/spin incidents during engine-out maneuvers in twin engine aircraft, and midair collisions. Operational factors of concern include circle-to land instrument approaches south of Runway 11-29, extensive “pattern work” by student pilots in fixed-wing aircraft (predominantly, but not exclusively to the south and west of the airport), and extensive practice flight by students in rotary-wing aircraft to the north of the airport. Nonetheless, because aircraft in Area S-2 are at greater altitude and are less densely concentrated than in other portions of the Airport Planning Area, the overall level of aviation safety risk is considered to be lower than that in Area S-1 or the Runway Protection Zones. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-73 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Project Site development is located within Safety Area S-1, which represents some of the highest risk areas for an aircraft accident near the airport. An aircraft strike on a facility that has AHMs stored in large quantities would likely result in a breach on containment and the release of hazardous materials over a wide area. The risk of an aircraft strike in Safety Area S-1 is sufficiently high that an accidental AHM release would be considered potentially significant. Mitigation Measures HM-8 The Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels limiting on-site storage of AHMs to amounts less than the lowest reportable quantities as currently defined in California Health and Safety Code §2770.5, California Accidental Release Program (CalARP) List of Substances, and California Code of Regulations §5189, Process Safety Management of Acutely Hazardous Materials, Appendix A. Residual Impacts Limiting the volume of AHM storage in facilities that would be located in ALUP Safety Area S-1 would minimize the potential consequences of an accidental AHM release to a level that is considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.9 Risk associated with land use changes and aircraft wildlife strikes and other aircraft hazards. Development Class III The City Development Plan portion of the Project would include land uses that could result in increased wildlife, mainly birds, in SLOCRA Safety Area S-1. Specifically, the proposed inclusion of recreational facilities, such as the ball fields, could lead to additional wildlife. Parks, golf courses, natural resources, and natural areas have the potential to create wildlife hazard attractants on or near airports. These areas may provide wildlife corridors, foraging opportunities e.g., grass fields, food/trash from ball field users), roost sites, rookeries, migratory flyway stop over sites or numerous other functions that may benefit wildlife but, due to their location, may create situations where wildlife are crossing airspace for approach, departing, or training aircraft Caltrans, 2011). However, it is unlikely that the proposed ball fields would result in any substantial change in the amount of wildlife over the current baseline (see Section 4.2 Biological Resources; specifically Section 4.2.1.9, Birds), but may only serve to change the species that forage at the Project Site, and the times that these species are present. The area is currently characterized by grassland, which attracts various species of birds, including birds of prey that feed on rodents. Species that have been involved in aircraft strikes include seagulls, hawks, pigeons, blackbirds, sparrows, finches, ducks, owls, American kestrels, meadowlarks and turkey vultures. Hawks are the most frequently impacted species. Subsequent to development, it is likely that opportunistic species, such as seagulls, pigeons, blackbirds, sparrows, finches, ducks, etc. would be attracted to the area, while predatory species, such as hawks, white-tailed kite, prairie falcon, northern harrier, and golden eagle (all observed at the Project Site) would be expected to decrease due to the decrease in feeding opportunities. Therefore, potential increase in aircraft wildlife strikes, if any, is considered to be less than significant. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-74 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Residual Impacts Potential hazards associated with increase aircraft wildlife strikes that could result from the proposed recreational facilities are considered less than significant (Class III). 4.11.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The County Development Plan component of the Project would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space, 370,000 sq. ft. for service and light manufacturing businesses, and an approximate 14-acre recreational/ball field facility. The County Development Plan would also include the construction of an on-site wastewater treatment plant on one acre located within the development envelope south of Tank Farm Road, on the southern parcel (refer to Figure 2-22). All of the impacts described above for the proposed remediation and City Development Plan components of the Project would be identical for the respective portions of the County Development Plan impacts with the exception of impact HM.7. Portions of HM.7 would be different since the County does not have Detailed Area Plan, ACOS or CDZ. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.10 Risk associated with chemical spills due to aircraft strikes for both the direct discharge and polishing pond wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) options. Development Class II Wastewater treatment frequently requires the use of acutely hazardous materials such as gaseous chlorine and sulfur dioxide. The proposed WWTF would require that all waste be treated to tertiary standards, which is typically accomplished using chlorine and sulfur dioxide. Given the proposed location of the WWTF in ALUP/SLOCRA Safety Area S-1b, the storage and use of acutely hazardous materials could pose a hazard in the event of an aircraft accident and strike on the WWTF. As noted in Impact HM.8 the Project Site development is located within Safety Area S-1, which represents some of the highest risk areas for an aircraft accident near the airport. An aircraft strike on a facility that has AHMs stored in large quantities would likely result in a breach on containment and the release of hazardous materials over a wide area. A WWTF typically stores chlorine and sulfur dioxide in ton containers or larger pressure vessels. Using ton containers as an example, the EPA RMP*Comp program was used to estimate worst- case injury hazard zones, which were 2.2 and 3.1 miles for chlorine and sulfur dioxide, respectively. Potential hazard zones would be considerably larger if the chlorine and sulfur dioxide were stored in larger pressure vessels. As shown in Figure 4.11-11, potential worst-case chlorine and sulfur dioxide hazard zones would be substantial and encompass a significant portion of the City. The acute toxicity of chlorine and sulfur dioxide, combined with the large quantities required to operate a WWTF, have been a driving force in using alternative chemicals and/or treatment methods for wastewater treatment. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-75 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.11-11 Wastewater Treatment Facility Chlorine and Sulfur Dioxide Hazards 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-76 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Mitigation Measures HM-10 Prior to recordation of applicable tract map, the Applicant shall include deed restrictions on the WWTF parcel limiting on-site storage of reportable quantities of chlorine and sulfur dioxide, and requiring the use of alternative chemicals that are not classified as acutely hazardous materials, or other non-chemical technologies in order to achieve tertiary treatment of wastewater. Residual Impacts A wide variety of treatment options are available as substitutes for chlorine in the disinfection process and sulfur dioxide in the dechlorination process prior to discharge of the treated effluent. Sodium hypochlorite and sodium hydroxide are common substitutes for chlorine and sulfur dioxide at California WWTFs. In addition, methods such as ultraviolet radiation and ozonation are also available to disinfect wastewater. The use of an alternative wastewater treatment technology would reduce potentially significant to a level that is considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.11 Risk associated with polishing ponds WWTF option could affect aircraft bird strikes. Development Class II The locations of the proposed treatment plant and disposal facility structures are restricted by the Airport Land Use Plan, which was developed in compliance with the State Aeronautics Act. The Airport Land Use Plan designates safety areas surrounding the airport, runway and landing/take off flight paths. The restrictive zones limit any development which causes an obstruction to air navigation. The entire Project Site is located within designated airport safety areas. These areas are shown in Figure 4.11-12. The most restrictive zone is the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) as outlined in red. Runway Protection Zones are areas immediately adjacent to the ends of each active runway. The level of aviation safety risk is very high, consequently, structures are prohibited and human activities are limited to very low levels. The proposed WWTF has, therefore, been proposed to be located outside of the RPZ, within Safety Area S-1b, just south of Tank Farm Road on the east side of the tank farm property (see Figure 4.11-12. Safety Areas labeled as S-1b are less restrictive than a RPZ zone, however, aviation safety hazards are considered relatively greater within these areas and development is limited as to total building coverage, density, special function land use, etc. Although the wastewater treatment facility is proposed to be located outside of the Runway Protection Zone, the 0.7 acre of the polishing wetlands option would be located within the Runway Protection Zone (see Figure 4.11-12). The polishing wetland discharge option consists of a constructed wetland design as a supplemental effluent treatment option. Effluent would be released from the wastewater treatment facility and conveyed into the wetlands. The effluent would be contained within the 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-77 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR wetlands for several days to allow for further removal of nitrogen. The treated effluent would then be released from the wetlands and discharged into Tank Farm Creek. Figure 4.11-12 Airport Safety Areas and Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility Although the polishing wetlands are designed to hold water for a temporary period, the development of the wetlands and regular introduction of water would create an environment that would attract wildlife including birds. The polishing wetland option would create an environment that would attract birds and create a significant hazard to aircraft and be inconsistent with the Airport Land Use Plan. Mitigation measures commonly used for the reduction of bird populations surrounding airports include habitat management practices, including the reduction of standing water, thinning of brush, grass, etc., all of which would limit the efficiency and effectiveness of the polishing wetlands. The use of the wetland polishing ponds would represent a significant aircraft hazard due to the potential for bird strikes. Mitigation Measures HM-11 Polishing ponds shall not be allowed as part of the design of the WWTF unless the applicant can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the County, that engineering methods are available and can be incorporated in the polishing pond design that would ensure no increase in bird or other wildlife populations on the site will result from the construction and operation of the polishing pond. Such measures could include, but not be limited to covers over the ponds, special netting, and hazing devices. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-78 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Residual Impacts The FAA Advisory Circular No. 150/5200-33B, dated 8/28/07, and the UC Davis Bird Hazing Manual, dated 2008, were reviewed for information on widely accepted engineering controls that could be applied to a polishing pond associated with a wastewater treatment plan. Both reports include methods for deterring birds from being attracted to open water ponds, including wastewater ponds. Examples included in the FAA Circular include bird balls, floating pillows, wire grids, and netting. The UC Davis Bird Hazing Manual also recommends use of netting and wire grids on fixed facilities. Floating pillows or bird balls are recommends for use on small areas of open water. Both documents indicate that there are accepted engineering controls that could be implemented to mitigate the attraction to wildlife and bird strike hazards should the polishing pond be constructed. Avoiding the use of, or adequately including engineering controls of polishing ponds to prevent an increase in the bird population on the site, would reduce potential bird strike impacts to a level that is considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact HM.12 Potential public risk associated with development within the SLOCRA Safety Areas. Development Class III The proposed County Development Plan would include development within Safety Areas S-1b, S-1c. The County Plan would be developed without any Detailed Area Plan, ACOS or CDZ. This would allow non-residential densities of 40 persons per acre in S-1b and 50 persons per acre in S-1c (see Table 4.11-2). Also without and density adjustments, the allowable maximum building coverage would be limited to 10 and 15 percent of gross project area for S-1b and S-1c respectively. Table 4.11-6 provides a breakdown of the density calculations for the proposed County Development Plan. The data in Table 4.11-6 shows that the Project would be well below the allowable population and maximum building coverage densities in the ALUP. A conceptual site plan prepared by the Cal Ripken Baseball Association has been submitted to the Applicant (see Figure 2-19). The proposed ballfield project area would be rezoned as a part of the Project with implementation to be completed by Cal Ripkin at a future date. The Applicant’s involvement with the Cal Ripken project is limited to donation of the property. The area would be comprised of up to three baseball fields and amenities that may include the following characteristics: A 147,500 ft2 championship baseball field with sports lighting, scoreboard, built in terrace seating, and bleachers; A 104,500 ft2 baseball field with lighting, scoreboard, bleachers, and scorekeepers booth; 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-79 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.11-6 Population Density Calculations for County Development Plan Land Use Type Zoning Population in Each Safety Zone RP Zone SA S-1a SA S-1b SA S-1c Total Light Manufacturing I 0 0 563 287 850 Industrial Research and Development I 0 0 166 84 250 Business Park (Offices) CS 0 0 1,563 1,917 3,480 General Retail CS 0 0 0 50 50 Vehicle Services -Repair and Maintenance-Major I 0 0 100 0 100 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animal I 0 0 25 0 25 Photo and Film Processing Lab I 0 0 50 0 50 Printing and Publishing I 0 0 50 0 50 Warehousing, Indoor Storage I 0 0 33 17 50 Wholesaling and Distribution I 0 0 110 56 167 Hotel (115 rooms) CS 0 0 0 549 549 Specialized Education/Training Facility I 0 0 111 0 111 Wastewater Treatment CS 0 0 5 0 5 Total Population 0 0 2,777 2,959 5,736 Population Density (persons per acre based on gross area) 0 0 9 9 Allowable Population Density 5 30 40 50 Maximum Building Coverage (% gross area) 0 0 2.3% 2.1% Allowable Building Coverage (% gross area) 0 5 10% 15% 1. Population density and gross area are based upon acreage of entire development project including the open space. 2. Allowable population density is based upon data in Table 7 of the ALUP with no ACOS, CDZ or ADP. 3. Assumes half of the building square footage is made up of two story buildings in the calculation of maximum building coverage. A 108,000 ft2 flexible use field (Baseball and Softball) with scoreboard, bleachers, and scorekeepers booth; Batting cages totaling 3,500 ft2; Restrooms, a plaza, and a playground totaling 17,000 ft2; Parking area totaling 45,000 ft2; and Open grass areas for team warm up, general use, picnic tables, and benches totaling 236,580 ft2. As shown in Figure 2-26, the baseball field complex would be partially within the Runway Protection Zone, with the remainder of the complex falling in Safety Area S-1b. The SLOCRA ALUP allows for outdoor sports and recreation within the Runway Protection Zone, but prohibits structures that could interfere with aircraft navigation and safety, while some structures are allowed in Safety Area S-1b. The FAA has reviewed the facility and issued determinations of No Hazard to Air Navigation” for each structure in the ball field complex. Since the SLOCRA ALUP allows for this type of land use, the average non-residential population densities would be 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-80 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR within the ALUP guidance, and the FAA has determined that facility structures would not pose a hazard to air navigation, the baseball field complex would not pose a significant risk to airport safety or users of the baseball field complex. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the Project are considered less than significant Class III). Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Residual Impacts Potential hazards associated with development within SLOCRA Safety Area S-1 are considered less than significant (Class III). 4.11.7 Cumulative Analysis As stated in Chapter 3.0, Cumulative Scenario and Methodology, under the CEQA Guidelines, a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental impact report (“EIR”) together with other projects causing related impacts.” Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in section 15065(c). The Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies specific City and County Development Plans that, depending on location and timing could, in combination with the proposed remediation, restoration and City and County Development Plan elements of the Project, result in cumulative impacts to public safety. Each of the impacts identified in Section 4.11.4 were considered as they relate to impacts to hazards and hazardous materials and are discussed in this section as they relate to the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts. 4.11.7.1 Cumulative Public Health Risk The HHRA prepared for the Project found that off-site health risks were less than significant. In addition, following mitigation the Project was found to have a less than significant health risk for Project Site users following development. Most of the cumulative projects identified in Table 3.1 are too far from the Project Site to contribute to a cumulative health risk. The industrial project on Buckley Road (#21) is fairly close to the Project Site, but at this point it would be speculative to assume there would be a cumulative health risk when the use of this industrial site has not been established. Even if the site is eventually developed where a facility emits toxic air contaminants, the project would need to meet the SLOAPCD’s health risk criteria at the facility boundary. Given the low off-site health risk associated with the Project, any cumulative health risk would remain below the SLOAPCD’s risk limits in the vicinity of the Project Site and the proposed Buckley Road industrial buildings. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-81 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.11.7.2 Cumulative Truck Transportation Risk Most of the projects listed in Table 3.1 will generate additional passenger vehicle and truck traffic, thus adding to the cumulative project risk. However, it is unlikely that any of these projects will generate enough truck trips, especially during the period of active remediation and restoration, to result in a significant truck transportation risk. As noted in Impact HM.2, the Project truck accident fatality risk was about half of the significance criteria for impacted soil transportation to the Santa Maria Landfill. The proposed Project truck accident fatality risk for impacted soil transport to the Kettleman Hills/Buttonwillow area is close to the significance criteria due to the longer distance. However, in terms of cumulative risk, the Project risk is calculated for the entire distance between the Project Site and the destination landfills. As such, very little of the truck accident risk occurs in the immediate project area and in the vicinity of the cumulative projects. Therefore, the cumulative truck transportation risk is considered less than significant in the project area. 4.11.7.3 Cumulative Aircraft Wildlife Strike Risk Of the projects listed in Table 3.1, the Green Waste Management Facility is the only facility that would have the potential to attract wildlife, especially birds, due to green waste composting. The Green Waste Management Facility would be located on Orcutt Road west of the airport. Since the Project would not result in an increase in wildlife populations at the Site, it would not contribute to a cumulative impact. Therefore, cumulative aircraft wildlife strike risk would be less than significant. 4.11.7.4 Cumulative Aircraft Strike Risk Many of the cumulative projects that are listed in Table 3.1 are within one of the airport Safety Areas. As such, their development would be limited to the Airport Area Specific Plan population densities for each Safety Area. As a result, cumulative development within the Airport Area Specific Plan area would not contribute to a significant increase in risk associated with an aircraft strike. Therefore, cumulative aircraft strike risk is considered less than significant. 4.11.7.5 Cumulative Acutely Hazardous Material Accidental Release Risk The Project includes mitigation to severely limit the use of acutely hazardous materials on the Project Site following development. None of the projects listed in Table 3.1 would substantially contribute to Project-related impacts, nor would the Project substantially contribute to cumulative impacts of the listed projects. Therefore, potential hazardous material cumulative impacts are considered less than significant. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-82 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.11.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.11.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party HM-1 Prior to issuance of grading or other related permits authorizing initiation of the remediation and restoration component of the project, the Applicant shall submit to the City and County written verification from the RWQCB that the Remedial Action Plan has been finalized and approved. Review of written verification from RWQCB Prior to issuance of grading permit for remediation County Department of Planning and Building HM-4 The applicant shall limit the on-site wetland replacement to a ratio of 1:1 for a total on- site wetland restoration of 46.64 acres (42.93 acres for remediation and 3.71 acres for development area). County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve restoration plan and independent biological monitor to conduct regular monitoring. Plan approved prior to permit issuance and monitoring conducted throughout construction and restoration phases County Department of Planning and Building 4.11.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party HM-6 Prior to recordation of applicable tract map, the Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels identifying specific limits on trenching activities and procedures for conducting subsurface construction activities. The Applicant shall maintain responsibility for air quality monitoring during any subsurface excavation activities. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve deed restrictions in conjunction with the City. Prior to recordation of applicable tract map. City of San Luis Obispo HM-8 The Applicant shall include deed restrictions on development parcels limiting on-site storage of AHMs to amounts less than the lowest reportable quantities as currently defined in California Health and Safety Code 2770.5, California Accidental Release Program (CalARP) List of Substances, and California Code of Regulations §5189, Process Safety Management of Acutely Hazardous Materials, Appendix A. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve deed restrictions in conjunction with the City. Prior to recordation of applicable tract map. City of San Luis Obispo 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-83 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.11.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Requirements Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party HM-10 Prior to recordation of applicable tract map, the Applicant shall include deed restrictions on the WWTF parcel limiting on-site storage of reportable quantities of chlorine and sulfur dioxide. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve deed restrictions. Prior to recordation of applicable tract map. County of San Luis Obispo HM-11 Polishing ponds shall not be allowed as part of the design of the WWTF unless the applicant can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the County, that engineering methods are available and can be incorporated in the polishing pond design that would ensure no increase in bird or other wildlife populations on the site will result from the construction and operation of the polishing pond. Such measures could include, but not be limited to covers over the ponds, special netting, and hazing devices. County Department of Planning and Building to review and approve wastewater treatment design drawings. Prior to issuance of applicable grading permit. County of San Luis Obispo 4.11.9 References The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for San Luis Obispo County. 2005. Airport Land Use Plan for the San Luis Obispo Regional Airport. San Luis Obispo, CA: The Airport Land Use Commission for San Luis Obispo County; May 18, 2005. Applied Geochemical Strategies, Inc. (AGSI). 2003a. Memorandum: Characterization of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Detected in Surface Water from Unocal’s Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm – Version 2.0. Attachment 10 of McDaniel Lambert, Inc.’s 2004 Baseline HHRA. Applied Geochemical Strategies, Inc. (AGSI). 2003b. Memorandum: Characterization of TPH and PAH’s in Soils and Sediment, and Surface Tars from Unocal’s Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Attachment 7 of McDaniel Lambert, Inc.’s 2004 Baseline HHRA. Avocet Environmental, Inc. (Avocet). 2007. Remedial Action Plan, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. December 18, 2007. Avocet Environmental, Inc. (Avocet). 2007. Feasibility Study, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. March 15, 2007. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2011. California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. October. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 1994. Benzo[a]pyrene as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Part B. Health Effects of Benzo[a]pyrene. Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section, Office of Environmental Human Health Assessment, Berkeley, CA. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-84 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 1994. Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, CA. Reprinted in 1999. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 1997. Selecting Inorganic Constituents as Chemicals of Potential Concern and Risk Assessments At Hazardous Waste Sites and Permitted Facilities, Human and Ecological Risk Division, California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). February. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 1999. Department of Toxic Substances Control Lead Risk Spreadsheet Version 7.0. Updated January 2009. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Sacramento, CA. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2002. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines – Part II Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Factors. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2012. Advisory – Active Soil Gas Investigations. Letter from Department of Toxic Substance Control and LA California Regional Water Quality Control Board. April. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2005a. Human-Exposure-Based Screening Numbers Developed to Aid Estimation of Cleanup Costs for Contaminated Soil. External Review Draft. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. January. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2005b. Use of California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) in Evaluation of Contaminated Properties. January. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2005c. Advisory on Methane Assessment and Common Remedies at School Sites. Department of Toxic Substances Control. June. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2007. Arsenic Strategies – Determination of Arsenic Remediation, Development of Arsenic Cleanup Goals for Proposed and Existing School Sites. Department of Toxic Substance Control. March 21. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2012. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Table of Acute, 8-hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels (RELs). Available online: http://www.oehha.org/air/allrels.html California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2009a. Interim Guidance for Evaluating Human Health Risks from Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). Human and Ecological Risk Division, California Department of Toxic Substance Control. June 16. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2009b. Technical Support Document for Cancer Potency Factors: Methodologies for derivation, listing of available values, and adjustments to allow for early life stage exposures. Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch, Office of Environmental and Human Health Assessment. May. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2009c. Human Health Risk Assessment HHRA) Note 3. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control, Office of Human and Ecological Risk. May. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-85 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2009d. Revised California Human Health Screening Level for Lead. Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment. September. Available online: http://www.oehha.org/risk/pdf/LeadCHHSL091709.pdf California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2009e. Human Health Risk Assessment HHRA) Note 2. Remedial Goals for Dioxins and Dioxin-like Compounds for Consideration at California Hazardous Waste Sites. Interim, May 2009. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/AssessingRisk/upload/HHRA_Note2_dioxin-2.pdf California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2010. List of California Human Health Soil-Screening Levels (CHHSLs). Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment. September. Available online: http://oehha.ca.gov/risk/chhsltable.html California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2011. Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air. Final. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). October. California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA). 2012. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database. Available online: http://www.oehha.ca.gov/risk/ChemicalDB/index.asp Chevron Environmental Management Company. 2007. Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Project, San Luis Obispo, CA. December 20, 2007. Earth Systems Pacific, 2002a. Analysis for Pesticides and Herbicides, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. July. Earth Systems Pacific, 2002b. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2002, Monitoring and Reporting Program 93-120 –, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. October. EDAW, Inc. (EDAW). 1999. Wetland Delineation for Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. Project No. 8T148.01. Delineation certified by United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service in a letter dated September 10, 1999, entitled Verification of Jurisdictional Delineation of Wetlands at Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. July 23. England & Associates. 1999a. Additional Site Characterization, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. April. England & Associates. 1999b. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Issues For the Proposed Unocal Tank Farm Development and Ecological Preserve, San Luis Obispo, California. August. England Geosystem, Inc. 2001. Supplemental Site Characterization, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. October. England Geosystem, Inc. 2002. Reservoir Bottom Hydrocarbon Seepage Study, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. November. England Geosystem, Inc. 2003a. Background Metals Evaluation, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. February. Attachment 11 of McDaniel Lambert, Inc.’s 2004 Baseline HHRA. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-86 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR England Geosystem, Inc. 2003b. Characterization of Petroleum Fractions in Surface Exposures and Shallow Soil, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. November 26. England Geosystem, Inc. 2003c. Soil Gas Monitoring Report September 2002, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. January 30. England Geosystem, Inc. 2003d. Supplemental Evaluation of Surface Water, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. February 20. England, Shahin & Associates. 1994. Supplemental Ground Water Investigation Unocal Tank Farm Facility. May 11, 1994. JENESIS Ecological Services, 2003. Wetland Delineation of the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. McDaniel Lambert, Inc. 2011. Supplemental Human Health Risk Assessment for the Unocal Avila Tank Farm. Version 3.0. Prepared for the Avila Tank Farm Collaborative Assessment Team. May 2, 2011. Agencies’ Acceptance Letter dated July 20, 2011. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2007. Additional Sampling of Surface Monitoring Location SW- 9, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. May 7, 2007. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) and WSP Environment and Energy. 2008a. An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Prepared for Chevron Environmental Management Corporation. August 5, 2008. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) and WSP Environment & Energy (WSP). 2008b. An Analysis of the Geographic Extent of Waters of the U.S., Including Wetlands at the Chevron Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. Consultant’s report developed for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, California. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) and WSP Environment & Energy (WSP). 2009. Landscape Restoration for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm 75% Basis of Design Report. Consultant’s report developed for Chevron EMC, San Luis Obispo, California. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2010. Technical Work Plan, Assessment of Shallow Soils for Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Dibenzofurans, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. March. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2011a. Technical Work Plan, Soil Gas Assessment Activities Former Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. May. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2011b. Report of Findings, Assessment of Shallow Soils for Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Chlorinated Dibenzofurans, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California. March. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2011c. First Semi-Annual (1S11) Surface Water Monitoring Report, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Facility, San Luis Obispo, California. April. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2013 4.11-87 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2011d. Second Semi-Annual (2S11) Groundwater Monitoring Report, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. October. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2012a. Report of Findings, Soil Gas Assessment, Former Unocal Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California. January. Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre). 2012b. Report Of Findings, Geologic Evaluation Of Naturally Occurring, Asbestos And Material Durability Assessment, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, December. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Vol. I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part A, Interim Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/1-89/002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 55, No. 46, Rules and Regulations, March 8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Vol. I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives, Interim Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA 9285, 7-01C. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992a. Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment, Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/G90/008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992b. Guidance on Risk Characterization for Risk Assessors and Risk Managers, Memorandum, Feb. 26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. Derivation of a volatilization factor to estimate upper bound exposure point concentration for workers in trenches flooded with groundwater off-gassing volatile organic chemicals. Region 8. Ref: 8EPR-PS. July 29, 1999. As cited in URS 2008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels at Superfund Sites. December. OSWER 9355.4-24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2004a. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Vol., I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment, Final. EPA/540/R/99/005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2004b. Users Guide for Evaluating Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/68-W- 01-58. DTSC modification of Advanced Soil Gas model downloaded from http://www.oehha.ca.gov/risk/jefiles/jande.html, but no longer available. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2005. Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens. March. EPA/630/R-03/003F. 4.11 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Chevron Tank Farm 4.11-88 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009a. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Vol. I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment, Final. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009b. Toxicological Review of Thallium and Compounds (CAS No. 7440-28-0) In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). September. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2011a. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment. October. EPA/600/C-99/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2011b. ProUCL Software, Version 4.1. Environmental Sciences Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory. Available from worldwide web: www.epa.gov/esd/tsc/software.htm. User Guide dated May 2010. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012a. Integrated Risk Information System IRIS) database. February. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/iris/ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012b. Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for Chemical Contaminants at Superfund Sites. November. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/index.htm 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.12 Population and Housing This section details the existing population, housing, and employment characteristics of the unincorporated area of San Luis Obispo County (County), as well as the City of San Luis Obispo City), and addresses the potential population, housing, and employment impacts created by the Project. The Project’s consistency with the County of San Luis Obispo Housing Element 2009- 2014 (adopted August 25, 2009 and amended December 8, 2009) and the City of San Luis Obispo Housing Element (adopted January 19, 2010 and amended April 2010) is provided in Appendix E of this EIR. 4.12.1 Environmental Setting The Project Site is in an unincorporated area of the County, just south of the City and within the County’s San Luis Obispo Planning Area. As described in Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis, under the County Development Plan, the Project would be under the jurisdiction of the County of San Luis Obispo General Plan, while under the City Development Plan it would be under the authority of the City of San Luis Obispo Airport Area Specific Plan AASP). As further described in Section 4.12.1.1, Existing City and County Population and Projections, the County and City have experienced significant growth in the past 30 years. Sources of demographic information consulted in the preparation of this section include the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG), the State of California Department of Finance, the U.S. Census Bureau, the County, and the City. 4.12.1.1 Existing City and County Population and Projections In the 1990s, 75 percent of growth was driven by net migration while the remaining 25 percent of growth was driven by the natural increase in the population (SLOCOG 2011). Since 2000, the County witnessed a net migration representing 80 percent of the population growth. Overall, however, the County’s population growth on a percentage basis has generally been declining since the 1980s (SLOCOG 2011). Between 1990 and 1999, the City grew at annual average of only 0.3 percent, well below the General Plan’s 1 percent growth estimate. Since April 2000, the City has grown a total of 1 percent, with the annual rate varying from a negative 0.3 percent to a positive 0.5 percent (City 2010a). The following subsections discuss existing and projected population estimates for the County and City, which vary depending on source. SLOCOG City and County Population Projections According to the US Census, the City’s population in 2010 was 45,119, while San Luis Obispo County had a total population of 269,637 (SLOCOG 2011). Nearly 40 percent (118,118) of the population reside in unincorporated areas of the County (SLOCOG 2011). The SLOCOG reported that growth has mostly occurred in Paso Robles and the unincorporated areas of the County, a trend anticipated to continue in the future especially within the City based on historic norms (SLOCOG 2011). Overall, the majority of the population growth in the County has stemmed from net domestic migration, which represented 77 percent of net migration in 1990 and 81 percent in the 2000s (SLOCOG 2011). 4.12 Population and Housing Chevron Tank Farm 4.12-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.12.1 presents SLOCOG’s medium projected population growth estimates (2010 to 2040) for the City, and the entirety of the County, including its unincorporated areas. According to SLOCOG’s medium growth population estimates, positive growth is expected within all planning areas through 2040. However, when analyzed more closely, the amount of growth in each five-year interval is erratic, especially between 2010 and 2025 where growth varies significantly in that population increases estimated for one five-year period is sometimes significantly less than the one preceding it. For example, the City is estimated to witness a population increase of 731 residents between 2010 and 2015, followed by the addition of 1,301 residents between 2015 and 2020, and ending with to the addition of only 735 new residents between 2020 and 2025. The unincorporated areas and overall County population estimates exhibit similar trends to that of the City. After the year 2025, all planning area population growth estimates appear to have less significant fluctuations. By 2040, the total population for the City, unincorporated areas, and the County as a whole, are expected to increase by 11.2 percent, 24.7 percent and 19.4 percent respectively. Table 4.12-1 SLOCOG Medium Population Growth Estimate, 2010 to 2040 Planning Area 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 San Luis Obispo (City) 43,937 44,668 45,969 46,704 47,622 48,550 49,487 Unincorporated Area 104,324 107,452 113,789 118,982 125,467 132,023 138,644 County Total Population 269,637 275,590 286,940 296,851 309,288 321,741 334,377 Source: SLOCOG 2011. County of San Luis Obispo: City and County Population Projections According to County population estimates, the City’s population in 2008 was 42,835, while the County and County unincorporated areas had populations of 267,068 and 103,692, respectively County 2009). The population of the County’s San Luis Obispo planning area was 46,867. The County population projections are significantly greater than the SLOCOG projections. Table 4.12-2 presents the County’s population growth estimates for the City and San Luis Obispo planning area, as well as County unincorporated areas, from 2008 to 2030. Unlike the SLOCOG population estimates, the County is less erratic and displays significant positive growth initially between 2008 and 2015, then slows substantially thereafter to 2030. According to the County of San Luis Obispo Housing Element, the projected population growth in the planning areas would not require an amendment to the County General Plan (County 2009). 4.12.1.2 Existing City and County Housing Conditions and Housing Projections Existing Housing Conditions During this decade, the rate of housing production in the City and County, as well as the County unincorporated areas, has slightly exceeded the rate of population growth. Between 2000 and 2010, the City gained 945 residents, an increase of 2.1 percent. During the same period, the City’s housing stock grew by approximately 1,213 units, an increase of approximately 5.9 percent. During this equivalent time frame the County added approximately 22,956 residents and 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR the County unincorporated areas added approximately 349 residents, increases of 8.5 percent and 0.3 percent, respectively. Table 4.12-2 County of San Luis Obispo Household Population Growth Estimates Planning Area 2008 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 San Luis Obispo Planning Areaa 46,867 47,703 49,827 52,048 54,116 56,267 San Luis Obispo City 42,835 43,549 45,432 47,396 49,224 51,123 San Luis Obispo Rural 4,032 4,154 4,396 4,652 4,892 5,144 Unincorporated 103,692 106,475 113,985 123,112 130,429 143,430 San Luis Obispo Countyb 267,068 273,110 289,042 306,939 322,347 343,885 a. The San Luis Obispo Planning Area includes City of San Luis Obispo incorporated and unincorporated areas. b. San Luis Obispo County population estimates include an estimated group-quarter population of 16,064. Group quarters include nursing homes, school dormitories, military barracks, prisons, jails, and hospitals. Source: County 2009. During the same period, the County’s housing stock increased by approximately 15,040 units, while the County’s unincorporated areas increased by approximately 8,101 units, increases of 12.8 percent and 16.6 percent, respectively (U.S. Decennial Census, 2000; California 2012). Table 4.12-3 provides total counts of housing units, amount of households, vacancy units, and vacancy rates. As shown in the table, the County has a vacancy rate of 13.04 percent, while the City has a vacancy rate of 6.62 percent. According to the County of San Luis Obispo Housing Element, most of the County’s vacant housing stock is in the category of seasonal, recreational, or occasional use units (County 2009). Table 4.12-3 City/County Census Housing Counts in San Luis Obispo City and County, 2010 Type Unincorporated City of San Luis Obispo County of San Luis Obispo Total Housing Units 48,550 20,553 117,315 Total Households 40,377 19,193 102,016 Vacant Units 8,173 1,360 15,299 Vacancy Rate (%) 2.68% 6.62% 13.04% Source: California 2012. 4.12 Population and Housing Chevron Tank Farm 4.12-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Overpayment and Overcrowding Overpayment refers to households paying more than 30 percent of their gross income to secure adequate shelter. The 2009 U.S. Census American Community Survey data indicate that 53.9 percent of owner households countywide (including cities) spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Additionally, 60.9 percent of renter households spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing (U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2009). The 2000 U.S. Census Bureau data indicate that in 1999, 61 percent of the City’s 10,858 renter households approximately 6,600 households) and 37 percent of the City’s 4,243 homeowners with home mortgages (approximately 1,570 households) overpaid for housing (City 2010a). It is important to note that overpayment figures for the City may be misleading because many of the City’s renters are students, which are typically in lower-income categories. Nevertheless, rising housing costs and relatively slow income growth are well documented, affirming that overpayment is a serious and ongoing problem in both the City and County of San Luis Obispo. As such, high housing prices often force lower-income households to accept smaller housing units, resulting in overcrowding. The U.S. Census Bureau defines an overcrowded unit as one occupied by 1.01 persons or more per room (excluding bathrooms). In 2000, there were 2,015 (5.7 percent) overcrowded housing units with more than one person per room (884 owner-occupied units and 1,131 renter-occupied units) within the unincorporated portions of the County (County 2009). Countywide (including cities) in 2009, 3,085 (3 percent) of the housing units were overcrowded, of which 1.5 percent were owner-occupied and 5.3 percent were renter-occupied. In 2009, among the 12,776 renter households in the City, an estimated 488 households were overcrowded (3.8 percent). Additionally, approximately 100 (1.2 percent) of the City’s 7,795 owner-occupied households were overcrowded (U.S. Census, ACS 2005-2009; City 2010a). Overall, approximately 2.5 percent of households in the City are overcrowded (U.S. Census, ACS 2005-2009). In comparison, approximately 13 percent of all renter-occupied housing units and 5 percent of all owner-occupied housing units in the State of California are overcrowded (U.S. Census, ACS 2005-2009). Regional Housing Needs The County and City are planning for future housing needs during the 2009 to 2014 planning period. The County analyzed vacant and underutilized land in urban areas that is suitable for residential development to show there is enough land zoned for housing to meet housing needs over the next five years. The Regional Housing Needs Plan, developed by SLOCOG and approved by the State Department of Housing and Community Development, designates 4,885 units for the County region. The assigned share of the regional housing need for the unincorporated portions of the County and the City is 1,296 and 1,589 new housing units, respectively, from August 31, 2009, until June 30, 2014. Table 4.12-4 shows the breakdown of the assigned share by income group. Note that the numbers in parentheses in the City row indicate the regional housing need allocation according to the City of San Luis Obispo as shown on Table 4, page 58 of the City’s Housing Element. The SLOCOG and Housing Element numbers both have the same total. According to the City’s General Plan Land Use Element, a total of 24,300 dwellings are anticipated within the City by the year 2022 (City 2010b). 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.12-4 Projected Housing Need By Income Planning Area Income Category Total Number of New Units Very Low 50% of median income) Low 51 – 80% of median income) Moderate 81 – 120% of median income) Above Moderate 121% of median income) City of San Luis Obispo 366 (370) 254 (259) 302 (295) 668 (665) 1,589 Unincorporated 298 207 246 544 1,296 San Luis Obispo County 1,224 782 928 2,052 4,885 Source: SLOCOG 2008; City 2010a. 4.12.1.3 Employment According to statistics provided by the State of California Employment Development Department, in May 2011 the employment total was 125,100 persons in the County and 25,000 persons in the City (California 2011). In addition, the unemployment rates were 9 percent and nearly 9.8 percent, respectively, for the County and City. The relatively high unemployment rates can be attributed to the national economic recession. The unemployment for the County has increased by 3.3 percent since June 2008. While the County has experienced significant job losses over the last year and more are expected, some of the largest job sectors, such as Government and Health Services, have helped stabilize the regional economy. Tourism-related industries, such as retail, leisure, and hospitality, are expected to remain weak in the near term (SLOCOG 2009). The County’s remote location makes it difficult to attract large employers or companies to the area. The mean wage in San Luis Obispo County ($40,225) is lower than similar coastal regions like San Diego, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, and San Francisco. The largest employers are government (23,200 jobs), leisure and hospitality (15,500 jobs), and educational and health services (11,400 jobs) (SLOCOG 2009). SLOCOG City and County Employment Projections According to SLOCOG, the City had approximately 33,000 jobs in 2010, while the County and unincorporated areas had 95,900 and 23,900 jobs, respectively (SLOCOG 2011). Unemployment levels in the County have remained below the state’s levels, but the growth and decline of non- farm jobs has been inconsistent and erratic (SLOCOG 2011). However, increases in 11,600 non- farm jobs are anticipated over a ten-year period between 2008 and 2018. The SLOCOG medium county non-farm employment estimates for long-term, by jurisdiction, reveal positive growth between 2010 and 2020 for all planning areas followed by a noticeable decline in growth between 2020 and 2025, and culminating with positive growth again from 2025 to 2040. Table 4.12-5 illustrates SLOCOG’s medium non-farm employment estimates for the City and overall County, as well as unincorporated areas, from 2010 to 2040. 4.12 Population and Housing Chevron Tank Farm 4.12-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.12-5 SLOCOG Medium County Non-Farm Employment Estimates, 2010 to 2040 Planning Area 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 City of San Luis Obispo 33,000 34,900 36,900 38,400 40,300 42,400 44,200 Unincorporated 23,900 25,100 26,400 27,300 28,500 29,800 30,800 San Luis Obispo County 95,900 101,300 106,700 110,700 115,700 120,800 125,900 Source: SLOCOG 2011. 4.12.1.4 Existing Job/Housing Imbalance As identified in Tables 4.12-3 and 4.12-5, in 2010 the City had 33,000 jobs (estimated) and a housing stock of 20,553 units. This creates a jobs/housing imbalance of 1.6 to 1, which means that employees will need to live in other communities and commute to work to the City, adding to traffic congestion and air pollution. By contrast, the unincorporated areas of the San Luis Obispo Planning Area have fewer jobs than houses with a jobs/housing ratio of 0.5 to 1 as shown in Table 4.12-6. Table 4.12-6 Jobs/Housing Imbalance 2010 Planning Area Jobs Housing Stock Jobs per Housing Unit City of San Luis Obispo 33,000 20,553 1.6 Unincorporated 23,900 48,550 0.5 San Luis Obispo County 95,900 117,315 0.82 Source: SLOCOG 2011. As described in published meeting materials for a town hall meeting that took place on May 13, 2010 regarding the County’s Land Use and Circulation Element Update, the ideal jobs/housing balance would be 1.5 to 1. The City’s 2011 Annual Report on the General Plan also reflects this target. Should the Project remain in the County and not be incorporated into the City, it would improve the jobs/housing imbalance of that area by creating jobs that could employ workers that reside in those unincorporated areas. However, should the Project be incorporated into the City, the current 1.6 to 1 jobs/housing imbalance would increase to 1.7 as identified in Table 4.12-8. 4.12.2 Regulatory Setting 4.12.2.1 Federal There are no federal population and housing regulations applicable to the Project. 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.12.2.2 State There are no state population and housing regulations applicable to the Project. 4.12.2.3 Local County County Land Use Ordinance Section 22.12.080 - Inclusionary Housing The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance applies to: (1) residential developments with two more dwelling units; (2) commercial/industrial development with a floor area of 5,000 square feet or more; (3) mixed-use development; or (4) subdivision of land. The methods of satisfying the inclusionary housing requirement include: (1) construction of employee housing or inclusionary housing units, whether located on-site or off-site; (2) payment of housing impact fees; or (3) donation of land. The housing impact fees are $2.11 per square foot for commercial/retail land uses, $2.46 per square foot for commercial services/offices land uses, and $0.98 per square foot for industrial/warehouse land uses. If employee housing or inclusionary housing would be provided in-lieu of fee payments, the total fee amount must be calculated. The housing impact fee shall produce the same number of housing units that an equal amount of in-lieu fees would produce for a residential project. Developable land may be donated instead of providing inclusionary housing units. The appraised land value must be equal or greater than the dollar value of the in-lieu fees or housing impact fees. County of San Luis Obispo Housing Element, 2009 to 2014 The primary purpose of the County Housing Element is to facilitate the provision of necessary housing in the context of the Land Use Element of the County General Plan and related ordinances. The secondary purpose is to meet the requirements of state law and achieve certification by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, which in turn will help the County qualify for certain funding programs offered by the state. The state generally requires an update to the Housing Element every five years. The Housing Element requires the implementation of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requiring development of affordable housing (Program HE 1.P). The proposed Project’s consistency with applicable Housing Element polices is described in Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis. City Inclusionary Housing Requirement of the City of San Luis Obispo (Ordinance 1508) The purposes and intents of this ordinance are to promote the public’s welfare by increasing the production of affordable housing units and to implement General Plan policies guiding land use and housing development. The Inclusionary Ordinance applies to development projects of five or more lots or new dwelling units and to commercial development projects of more than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. New development projects shall satisfy the Inclusionary Housing requirements, as specified in Tables 2 and 2A of the General Plan Housing Element, which provide that all nonexempt development projects shall contribute toward the production of affordable housing by constructing at least one affordable dwelling unit or paying an in-lieu fee. To meet the requirements, the developer shall comply with one or more of the following methods: 4.12 Population and Housing Chevron Tank Farm 4.12-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Construct the required number of affordable dwelling units, as specified in Table 2, as adjusted by Table 2A. Pay an in-lieu fee as described in Table 2, as adjusted by Table 2A. For development projects in which the adjustment factor under Table 2A equals zero, the minimum adjustment factor shall be 0.25 (resulting in a minimum in-lieu fee of 1.25 percent of the building valuation for in-city development projects and commercial developments in expansion areas, and 3.75 percent of building valuation for residential developments in expansion areas). Dedicate real property for affordable housing. Use a combination of the above methods, to the approval of the City council. City of San Luis Obispo Housing Element (Adopted January 19, 2010 and amended April 2010) The City prepared the Housing Element to help its citizens secure adequate and affordable housing and to comply with state law. Under Appendix P, Table 2: Inclusionary Housing Requirement, a commercial project located in an annexation area must build two affordable dwelling units per acre, but not less than one affordable dwelling unit per project; or pay in-lieu fees equal to 5 percent of building valuation. The Project’s consistency with applicable City plans, policies, and programs is discussed in Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis and Appendix E of this EIR. 4.12.3 Significance Criteria The following criteria are based on the County’s Initial Study and Appendix G of CEQA Guidelines. The effects of the proposed Project could be potentially significant if the Project would: Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure); Displace existing housing or people requiring construction of replacement housing elsewhere; or Create the need for substantial new housing in the area. 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.12.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact P/H.1 The remediation component of the Project may induce substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. Remediation Class III The proposed remediation component of the Project would occur on predominantly vacant land that is currently unused, and includes excavating contaminated soils, and capping affected areas to separate them from potential human and ecological receptors. The excavated contaminated soils would then be disposed of at an off-site facility, generating an estimated 13,083 truck trips round trips). Ongoing aspects of the remediation include monitoring groundwater, and imposing deed restrictions that prevent residential development and restrict groundwater use at the Project Site. The remediation component of the proposed Project would not induce growth in the area, either directly or indirectly, as no new construction of homes or businesses would result from its implementation, nor would it create an extension of major infrastructure. The Project Site is unoccupied, and so would not require the displacement of housing or people who would need replacement housing elsewhere, and due to the remediation activities not developing new structures, no new housing needs would be created. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts Due to the lack of population inducing impacts, and the lack of existing housing on the Project Site, the remediation component of the Project would have a less than significant (Class III) impact on Population and Housing. 4.12.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The City Development Plan component of the Project would create commercial facilities over a 20 to 25 year period to provide 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space, 370,000 sq. ft. for service- commercial, 265 acres of conservation/open space, 15 acres of public facilities/recreation and approximately 14 acres would be used for streets, sidewalks, and other frontage improvements, including 6.06 acres dedicated to the widening of Tank Farm Road. However, the Project would not provide new housing due to restrictions from the Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) that leaves little or no potential residential capacity at the Project Site. 4.12 Population and Housing Chevron Tank Farm 4.12-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact P/H.2 The City Development Plan may induce substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. Development Class III Development of the Project’s commercial facilities would provide opportunities for new jobs. Using the employee factors found in the County’s Public Facilities Financing Plan, this level of development would generate an estimated 1,971 jobs as listed in Table 4.12-7. Table 4.12-7 City Development Plan Employee Generation Land Use sq. ft. Employees per 1,000 sq. ft. Employees Generated Business Park 433,000 3.33 1,442 Service Commercial 370,000 1.43 529 Total Employees 1,971 Source: County 2006. As shown in Table 4.12-8, the proposed increase in employment opportunities under the City Development Plan would increase the jobs/housing imbalance from 1.6, without the Project, to 1.7, with the Project. In order to maintain the current ratio of 1.6, approximately 1,222 housing units would need to be built during Project bringing the total housing stock to 21,775. Table 4.12-8 City Development Plan Jobs/Housing Ratio Estimate Planning Area Existing Jobs Jobs/Housing Ratio w/o Project Existing Jobs + Project (1,971 jobs) Housing Stock Jobs/Housing Ratio with Project City 33,000 1.6 34,971 20,553 1.7 County Total Incorporated + Unincorporated) 95,900 0.82 97,871 117,315 0.83 Source: SLOCOG 2011; County 2006. According to the City’s 2009 Draft Development Capacity Survey, the City has the potential to accommodate up to 4,200 additional two-bedroom dwellings, or the equivalent in density units, within the City’s Urban Reserve Line (URL), based on the existing available land and the current condition of existing housing. The majority of that potential is within properties that have a pending or approved specific plan, including the Margarita Area (840 potential low, medium, and medium-high density residential D.U.) and Orcutt Area Specific Plans (1,000 additional housing units over the next 20 years). Both of these Plans are located within one mile of the proposed Project, with the Margarita Area adjacent to the northern boundary and the Orcutt Area located to the northeast of the Project Site. 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR With regard to the AASP, the proposed Project is already a part of the plan itself and is therefore a part of the City’s long term plans1. Based on the significance criteria from Appendix G of CEQA Guidelines, the Project: Would not induce substantial growth in an area directly by proposing new homes since none are proposed by this Project, or indirectly by extension of major infrastructure, because the Project Site is located on an existing arterial roadway (Tank Farm Road); Would not displace existing housing or people, as the Project Site is currently vacant; and Would not create the need for substantial new housing in the area, beyond that already planned. The Project would induce growth in the area by developing commercial facilities that may employ approximately 1,971 people. As stated above, the City reports capacity for 4,200 new dwellings to be developed within the URL. Development of those proposed residential developments would provide adequate housing in the area for the new residents that may be generated by the implementation of this Project over a 20 to 25 year period. The City Development Plan would result in a less than significant impact (Class III) to Population and Housing. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. However, it should be noted that the City Development Plan would develop commercial facilities greater than 2,500 sq. ft., requiring Inclusionary Housing Program participation. As a result, the Applicant would be required to comply with one or more of the following: Construct the required number of affordable dwelling units, as specified in Table 2, as adjusted by Table 2A. Pay an in-lieu fee as described in Table 2, as adjusted by Table 2A. For development projects in which the adjustment factor under Table 2A equals zero, the minimum adjustment factor shall be 0.25 (resulting in a minimum in-lieu fee of 1.25 percent of the building valuation for in-city development projects and commercial developments in expansion areas, and 3.75 percent of building valuation for residential developments in expansion areas). Dedicate real property for affordable housing. Use a combination of the above methods, to the approval of the City council. Residual Impacts The previously planned residential developments in the area would supply the necessary housing for Project induced growth. Additionally, the proposed Project itself is integrated into the AASP, as the plan describes the potential of and approval for the Project Site to be redeveloped. Therefore, residual impacts would be less than significant (Class III). With compliance with the 1 Personal communication with Kim Murray, August 24, 2011. 4.12 Population and Housing Chevron Tank Farm 4.12-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, City Development Plan residual impacts on affordable housing would be less than significant (Class III). 4.12.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The development of the Project under the County Plan would create commercial facilities over a 20 to 25 year period to provide 433,000 sq. ft. of building space for Commercial Service, 370,000 sq. ft. of Industrial building space, 250 acres of Open Space, 265 acres of Recreation Space (250 acres of open space and 15 acres as active sports field) and 13.4 acres of Right-of- Way with 6.06 acres for the Tank Farm Road widening. However, the Project would not provide new housing due to restrictions from the nearby airport operations. Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact P/H.3 The County Development Plan may induce substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. Development Class III Development of the County Plan commercial facilities would provide opportunities for new jobs. Using the employee factors found in the County’s Public Facilities Financing Plan, this level of development would generate an estimated 1,971 jobs as listed in Table 4.12-9. The proposed increase in employment opportunities under the County Plan would slightly increase the jobs to housing ratio for the unincorporated areas and the County as a whole by changing the ratio from 0.49 without the Project to 0.53 with the Project (for unincorporated areas) and from 0.82 to 0.83 for the County as a whole, as shown in Table 4.12-10. However, this change in jobs to housing ratio does not result in an imbalance of jobs to housing and therefore, the County Development Plan would result in a less than significant impact (Class III) to population and housing. Table 4.12-9 County Development Plan Employee Generation Land Use sq. ft. Employees per 1,000 sq. ft. Employees Generated Commercial Service 433,000 3.33 1,442 Industrial 370,000 1.43 529 Total Employees 1,971 Source: County 2006; SLOCOG 2011. Table 4.12-10 County Development Plan Jobs/Housing Ratio Estimate Planning Area Existing Jobs Jobs/Housing Ratio w/o Project Existing Jobs Project 1,971 jobs) Housing Stock Jobs/Housing Ratio with Project Unincorporated Areas 23,900 0.49 25,871 48,550 0.53 County Total Incorporated + Unincorporated) 95,900 0.82 97,871 117,315 0.83 Source: County 2006; SLOCOG 2011. 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR According to the City of San Luis Obispo 2009 Draft Development Capacity Survey, the potential to develop housing capacity exists to accommodate up to 4,200 additional two-bedroom dwellings, or the equivalent in density units, within the City’s Urban Reserve Line (URL), based on the existing available land and the current condition of existing housing. The majority of that potential is within properties that have a pending or approved specific plan, including the Margarita Area (840 potential low, medium, and medium-high density residential D.U.) and Orcutt Area Specific Plans (1,000 additional housing units over the next 20 years). Both of these Plans lie within one mile of the proposed Project, with the Margarita Area adjacent to the northern boundary and the Orcutt Area located to the northeast of the Project Site. Based on the significance criteria from Appendix G of CEQA Guidelines, the Project: Would not induce substantial growth in an area directly by proposing new homes since none are proposed by this Project, or indirectly by extension of major infrastructure, because the Project Site is located on an existing arterial roadway (Tank Farm Road); Would not displace existing housing or people, as the Project Site is currently vacant; and Would not create the need for substantial new housing in the area, beyond that already planned. The Project would induce growth in the area by developing commercial facilities that may employ approximately 1,971 people. As stated above, the developments adjacent to the Project Site and within the City report capacities for 4,200 new dwellings to be developed within the City’s URL. Development of those proposed residential developments would provide adequate housing in the area for the new residents that may be generated by the implementation of this Project over a 20 to 25 year period. The County Development Plan would result in a less than significant impact (Class III) to population and housing. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. It should be noted that the County Development Plan would develop commercial facilities greater than 5,000 sq. ft., requiring payment of Inclusionary Housing Impact fees or land donation to satisfy the requirements. As a result, The Applicant would be required to satisfy the inclusionary housing requirement by: (1) construction of employee housing or inclusionary housing units, whether located on-site or off-site; (2) payment of housing impact fees; or (3) donation of land. The housing impact fees are $2.11 per square foot for commercial/retail land uses, $2.46 per square foot for commercial services/offices land uses, and $0.98 per square foot for industrial/warehouse land uses. If employee housing or inclusionary housing would be provided in-lieu of fee payments, the total fee amount must be calculated. Residual Impacts The previously planned residential developments in the area would supply the necessary housing for Project induced growth, contributing toward efforts to achieve a more favorable jobs/housing ratio in both unincorporated areas and the County as a whole. Therefore, residual impacts would be less than significant (Class III). With the funding of affordable housing needs, County Development Plan residual impacts on affordable housing would be less than significant (Class III). 4.12 Population and Housing Chevron Tank Farm 4.12-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.12.7 Cumulative Analysis Under the CEQA Guidelines, “a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental impact report (“EIR”) together with other projects causing related impacts.” Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an environmental impact report (EIR) discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in section 15065(c). “An EIR need not discuss impacts that do not result in part from the project evaluated in that EIR. The Cumulative discussion does not need to provide as much detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone. The discussion of cumulative impacts shall be guided by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and shall focus on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute rather than the attributes of other projects which do not contribute to the cumulative impact” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)). 4.12.7.1 Remediation Project Impacts The remediation component of the Project does not propose to displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing, nor does it propose to displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Previously planned residential developments will supply the necessary housing for Project- induced growth. In the City, 588 residential units are either approved for development or are currently under construction. These units, in combination with the 4,200 dwelling unit capacity within the City, provide the housing necessary to accommodate the anticipated increase in job growth resulting from the Project’s implementation. Therefore, the cumulative impacts of the Project are less than significant. 4.12.7.2 City Development Plan Impacts The Project does not propose any new housing to be developed and does not displace any housing or people, as the Project Site is currently vacant. The list of cumulative projects for the City includes 588 proposed residential units, which will supply the necessary housing to accommodate potential Project induced growth. The Project’s cumulative impact on inducing growth in the area is thus considered to be less than significant. The development of commercial facilities greater than 2,500 square feet by the City Plan, in combination with related commercial projects to be developed, requires Inclusionary Housing Program participation. With the funding of affordable housing needs provided by this Project and other proposed projects in the City, cumulative impacts on affordable housing would be less than significant. 4.12.7.3 County Development Plan Impacts The Project does not propose any new housing to be developed and does not displace any housing or people, as the Project Site is currently vacant. The Project would induce growth through the development of the commercial facilities, but the development of proposed housing 4.12 Population and Housing December 2013 4.12-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR in the City would provide adequate housing for new residents generated by the implementation of this Project. Additionally, the increase in jobs aids in achieving a more favorable jobs/housing balance by providing an estimated 1,971 jobs. Therefore, the Project’s cumulative impact on inducing growth in the areas is thus considered to be beneficial. The development of commercial facilities greater than 5,000 square feet by the County Plan, in combination with the related commercial and industrial projects to be developed, requires Inclusionary Housing Program participation. With the funding of affordable housing needs provided by this Project and other proposed projects in the County, cumulative impacts on affordable housing would be less than significant. 4.12.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan There is no mitigation monitoring plan since no mitigation measures were required for population and housing. 4.12.9 References City of San Luis Obispo (City). 2010a. Housing Element, April 2010. 2010b. General Plan Land Use Element (last revised June 15, 2010). County of San Luis Obispo (County). 2006. Public Facilities Financing Plan for Unincorporated Area Facilities. 2009. Housing Element 2009-2014, adopted August 2009. San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). 2006. Long Range Socio-Economic Projections (Year 3030). Revised July 2006. 2008. Regional Housing Needs Plan. Adopted August 2008. 2009. Update to Long Range Socio-Economic Projections. May 2009. Revised August 2, 2010. 2011. San Luis Obispo County 2040 Population, Housing and Employment Forecast. Prepared by AECOM on August 11, 2011. State of California (California). 2011. Employment Development Department, Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places, accessed from: http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/?pageid=133. 2012. Department of Finance, E-8 Historical Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2000-2010. Sacramento, California, November 2012. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-1 4.13 Public Services and Utilities This section analyzes public service and utility systems for the Project. The Project would involve the remediation and restoration of the Project Site, followed by the construction of commercial and industrial development under either the City Development Plan or the County Development Plan, as described in Chapter 2.0, Project Description. Both development scenarios have the potential to impact public service and utility systems in the Project area. The information regarding existing conditions is primarily based on coordination with potentially affected public service agencies and utilities services. Specific references are within the subsection for each respective issue area. The following public service and utility organizations are addressed: Fire Protection Services (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, San Luis Obispo County Fire Department, and City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department); Police Protection Services (San Luis Obispo County Sheriff, City of San Luis Obispo Police Department, and California Highway Patrol); Public Schools (San Luis Coastal Unified School District); Energy (Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Gas Company); and Solid Waste (Santa Barbara Regional Integrated Waste Management Authority and San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority). Water Supply for City Development Plan only (City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department) Figure 4.13-1 shows the key existing public facilities operated by most of the above service providers, which are located in the vicinity of the Project. 4.13.1 Environmental Setting 4.13.1.1 Fire Protection Services The Project is within a Local Responsibility Area in a Moderate Fire Severity Zone (Zrelak 2009). This subsection identifies the fire protection service providers serving the Project area and potential and expected response times from the fire stations, analysis of the adequacy of reliable or adequate water flow, water pressure, and other fire department resources during a major fire, and an analysis of emergency access routes. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-2 Figure 4.13-1 Public Services 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-3 The Project Site is currently under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Forestry/San Luis Obispo County Fire Department (CALFIRE), and CALFIRE would continue to serve the site under the County Development Option. If the Project Site is annexed to the City, the City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department (SLOFD) would primarily serve the Project Site. However both the County and City fire departments operate under a mutual aid agreement, which allows one fire department to call upon the other for assistance during structural fires and other emergency situations. California Department of Forestry/San Luis Obispo County Fire Department The Project Site currently receives fire protection and paramedic services from the CALFIRE. CALFIRE, a California state agency, functions as the San Luis Obispo County Fire Department under a contract with the County. Approximately 180 full-time state employees operate the Department, supplemented by as many as 100 state seasonal firefighters, 300 county paid-call firefighters and reserve firefighters, and 120 state inmate firefighters (CALFIRE 2011). Of the CALFIRE stations throughout the County, Fire Station #21 (San Luis Obispo Airport Fire Station) would be the jurisdictional station (“first in”) for the Project Site. Fire Station #21, 4671 Broad Street in the City, is approximately 2 miles from the Project Site with a 4 to 5 minute response time (CALFIRE 2009). Station #21 houses specialized equipment, including a fire engine staffed with a minimum of two permanent personnel and a rescue squad staffed with 25 paid-call firefighters (CALFIRE 2009). Fire Station #12 (San Luis Obispo Fire Station) and Fire Station #62 (Avila Valley Fire Station) are also within the sphere of influence of the Project area. Fire Station #12 is approximately 6 miles from the Project Site, at 635 North Santa Rosa Street in the City (Zrelak 2009), Fire Station #12 includes a state fire engine staffed daily with a minimum of two to four personnel, including one fire captain and one firefighter, as well as a County fire engine staffed with paid- call firefighters. Fire Station # 62, at 1551 Sparrow Street in Avila Beach, is approximately 6 miles from the Project Site (Zrelak 2009). This station is staffed with two permanent CALFIRE employees, one fire apparatus engineer, and a fire captain, supported by 25 paid-call firefighters dispatched via radio pager. Both Fire Stations #12 and #62 have a 10-minute response time to the Project Site. It is important to note that the Department operates under a regional approach to providing fire protection and emergency medical services, and emergency response units are dispatched, as needed, to an incident anywhere in the district’s service territory based on distance and availability, without regard to jurisdictional or municipal boundaries. According to CALFIRE, fire protection appears to be adequate for the existing area and the staffing information and response times reported here remain current. (Zrelak 2011). City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department With a possible annexation into the City, the Project Site would primarily receive fire protection and paramedic services from the City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department (SLOFD). Approximately 55 full-time employees operate the SLOFD, including 13 captains, 15 engineers, and 12 firefighters. The remaining personnel include administrative and fire prevention personnel and one mechanic (SLOFD 2011). Of the SLOFD fire stations located throughout the City, Fire Stations #3 and #4 equally serve the Project Site (Maggio 2009). Fire Station #3, at 1280 Laurel Lane, was completed in 1960 to serve the growing south end of the City. A three- 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-4 person paramedic engine company staffs this station. Fire Station #4 is located at the intersection of Madonna Road and Los Osos Valley Road. The station, similarly staffed by a three-person paramedic engine company, acts as the base of operations for the fire captain, who is the paramedic coordinator for all paramedics on the SLOFD (SLOFD 2011). Fire Station # 1 is “third due” for the Project Site (Maggio 2009). Located at 2160 Santa Barbara Street, Fire Station #1 is the newest firehouse in the City. A battalion chief and a four-person paramedic truck company staff Fire Station #1 (SLOFD 2011). Fire Stations #3 and #4 are approximately 2.7 miles northeast and 2.4 miles northwest of the Project Site, respectively. Fire Station #1 is approximately 2.8 miles north of the Project Site (Google 2009). According to the Department, all City fire stations exceed the SLOFD’s response time goal of 4 minutes for the Project area (City of San Luis Obispo 2009, Maggio 2009). Existing SLOFD Deficiencies According to the SLOFD Master Plan for the City, the City has struggled to increase daily firefighter staffing as the population and service calls have increased significantly. In 2011, the daily firefighter count was 13, not including the battalion chief (SLOFD 2011), which is only two more than the count in 1978 (City of San Luis Obispo 2009). According to the SLOFD Master Plan, the southern annexation, which includes the Project Site, does not maintain 4- minute primary unit response coverage. In addition, existing City department daily firefighter staffing is not adequate as an initial force to extinguish serious fires without help from CALFIRE. To improve the response time deficits, the SLOFD Master Plan recommends the addition of a fifth fire station with an engine staffed by a minimum of three personnel. The SLOFD Master Plan bases this recommendation on their conclusion that increasing firefighter staffing at existing City fire stations would not address response times in the southern annexation area nor allow simultaneous emergency calls to be covered by a proposed fifth unit in the event a County unit is not available. Besides firefighter staffing deficits, the SLOFD Master Plan also addresses the City’s need to increase headquarter program functions and the need for fiscal policies to fund improvements in fire services in conjunction with new development. As indicated by the SLOFD, and the City’s Community Development Department (City of San Luis Obispo 2011), currently there are no development impact fees to pay for new fire department facilities within the City. In addition, general fund revenues to pay for staffing a new fire station may or may not be available at Project build-out (Maggio 2009). Mutual Aid Agreements between SLOFD and CALFIRE SLOFD has extensive interagency plans in partnership with CALFIRE, as well as with other neighboring fire departments. In California, virtually all fire departments are signatories to the California Master Mutual Aid Agreement. Except in cases of wildland fires or major disasters e.g., earthquakes), much of the Statewide Master Mutual Aid resources are inaccessible by somewhat isolated fire departments, like the City. According to the SLOFD Master Plan, this inaccessibility makes it necessary for the Department to internally ensure greater depth to handle major fires and to create reliable agreements with nearby neighbors to provide assistance. Approximately once a year SLOFD assists other departments in the County, except for CALFIRE, who SLOFD assists approximately 110 times per year. According to CALFIRE, the fire stations’ reciprocal agreement advises CALFIRE and SLOFD to each send one fire engine 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-5 during a fire emergency, if adequate resources are available (Zrelak 2009). According to the SLOFD Master Plan, simultaneous incident activity currently is not a significant issue because the City can draw on nearby mutual aid CALFIRE stations. Nevertheless, while the City benefits from the mutual aid response system, the SLOFD Master Plan suggests that this system could not replace existing City stations or units (City of San Luis Obispo 2009). Fire Safety Compliance Measures The County and City Municipal Codes set forth state and local fire prevention statutes and regulations to ensure that new developments meet standards for fire-flow, public and private fire hydrants, and roadway access provisions for fire-fighting units. Fire flow, the quantity of water available or necessary for fire protection in a given area, depends on the performance capacity of water lines to supply water during emergencies. Fire flow attributes include line pressure, rate of flow (i.e., gallons per minute), and duration over which prescribed volumes of water can be delivered at designated pressures. The quantity of water necessary for fire protection varies by land use type, life hazard, occupancy, and the degree or level of fire hazard. According to CALFIRE, at a minimum, the Project would require fire lanes 20 feet wide and fire hydrants no more than 300 feet apart. The proposed Project would require water flow of at least 1,500 gallons per minute for a duration of two hours (Zrelak 2009). According to SLOFD, the required fire flow would be dependent on the size and type of construction of the proposed buildings for this Project and shall be calculated at a minimum of 20 pounds per square inch residual. In addition, fire hydrants are required to be spaced no more than 500 feet apart on alternating sides of the street and no part of a building shall be more than 300 feet from a fire hydrant (Maggio 2009). See Section 4.5, Water Resources, for information regarding existing water supply conditions. 4.13.1.2 Police Protection Services This subsection discusses the police protection providers serving the Project area, potential and expected response times from the police stations, and the adequacy of police department resources. The Project Site is currently under the jurisdiction of the San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Department. If the Project Site were annexed into the City, the City of San Luis Obispo Police Department would primarily serve the Project Site. The California Highway Patrol (CHP) provides additional law enforcement support for the Project area. Regardless of which jurisdiction the Project Site is designated under, all law enforcement jurisdictions (state, County, and City) operate under the California Emergency Management Agency’s Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Plan (2009 Edition), which allows one law enforcement agency to request assistance from other law enforcement agencies, if necessary. San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Department The San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Department provides police protection and law enforcement services within the unincorporated portions of the County, including the Project Site. The Department’s Headquarters Station is located at 1585 Kansas Avenue in the City. The Headquarters Station provides dispatch, watch commander (shift oversight), administration, detectives, records and warrants, as well as property and custody services for the department Reid 2009). The Sheriff’s Department has 151 allocated positions; however, only 76 are allocated to patrol functions to serve the Department’s three patrol substations (Coast Station, North Station, and South Station) (Reid 2011). The balance of Department personnel is allocated 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-6 to either court service or administrative positions. The Department’s Coast Station, located at 2099 10th Street in the city of Los Osos, would serve the Project. Currently, this station directly serves a population of 53,544 (not including incorporated cities) within a service area that extends north along the coastline from Avila Beach to the Monterey County line. The station has approximately 23 sworn deputies to serve approximately 600 square miles. The Coast Station staffs one deputy per car during the daytime and two deputies per car at night. Usually from 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., there is generally one car covering the vicinity of the Project Site. However, after midnight, there is generally only one car covering the entire Coast Station jurisdiction (600 square miles). According to the San Luis Obispo Inland Area Plan, response times for the Sheriff’s Office vary based on allocated personnel, existing resources, time and day of week, and prioritized calls for law enforcement services (County of San Luis Obispo 2007). The overall average response time during 2010 for high priority calls in the Coast Station jurisdiction was 12 minutes based on 99 calls within the entire response area. According to the Sheriff’s Department, this is somewhat below their goal of responding to 90 percent of high priority calls within 10 minutes (Reid 2011). The department’s Coast Station participates in mutual aid agreements with the City of San Luis Obispo Police Department, CHP, and other law enforcement agencies, so the department can call these stations for assistance, if necessary. Volunteers donate their time, equipment, and expertise to the San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Department. The Sheriff's Auxiliary Volunteer Patrol was established to help the San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Department satisfy its law enforcement mission. Citizen volunteers are trained in a variety of law enforcement topics, such as observation skills, radio procedures, first aid, and supplemental patrol in neighborhoods and business districts. The Sheriff Department’s Search and Rescue Team, Aero Squadron, Posse, and Dive Team also enlist the aid of volunteers. City of San Luis Obispo Police Department The City of San Luis Obispo Police Department (SLOPD) provides police protection service and law enforcement for the City. The City’s police station serves approximately 12 square miles and is located at 1042 Walnut Street, approximately 4.3 miles north of the Project Site on local surface streets. Currently, 60 sworn officers provide service for the City. The on-call staffing level for the station varies during the day and night, but the SLOPD has a minimum staffing of four officers per shift. Generally, the SLOPD has between six and eight patrol officers, three to four motor (traffic) officers, and two to four downtown officers (Bledsoe 2011). The City’s adopted General Plan Safety Element establishes response performance standards for recurrent types of emergencies. The SLOPD has set a 30 percent available-time objective for patrol response (available time is the fraction of total time that a patrol unit is not previously assigned or otherwise unavailable for response to a new emergency call for service). The SLOPD is currently at or below this 30-percent available objective during most of the year (City of San Luis Obispo 2010). Nevertheless, according to the SLOPD, existing staff levels are adequate to meet the demands of the community (Bledsoe 2011). Depending on many circumstances (e.g., time of day, traffic, number of service calls), the SLOPD estimates that the response time to the Project Site would be anywhere between 2 and 10 minutes, depending on the priority of the call. The SLOPD works in partnership with the County Sheriff’s Department, especially on high priority calls. According to the department, it is much more common for the County Sheriff’s 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-7 Department to ask the SLOPD for assistance due to manpower and jurisdiction (Bledsoe 2009). The SLOPD has utilized civilian volunteers since the 1980s. Volunteers contribute as much as 4,000 hours of service each year. Typical volunteer assignments include data entry, evidence and property, juvenile diversion, crime prevention, and support assistance. California Highway Patrol The California Highway Patrol (CHP) provides traffic law enforcement in the unincorporated areas of the County and on all freeways in the Project area. The CHP also provides general law enforcement services and security on all state property and facilities. The CHP’s San Luis Obispo Station serves approximately 900 square miles and is located at 675 California Boulevard, approximately 4.3 miles north of the Project Site on local surface streets. Currently, 39 sworn officers staff the San Luis Obispo Station. The CHP operates three shifts in a 24-hour period: 5:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., 10:30 a.m. to 11 p.m., and 5:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Average deployment for each shift is six, two, and four officers, respectively. According to the department, existing staff levels adequately meet the current demands of the Project area (Day 2011). The officers with primary responsibility for Tank Farm Road spend the majority of their time patrolling U.S. Highway 101. Response times to Tank Farm Road average approximately 10 minutes, or 5 minutes on an emergency “code 3” run. The CHP has a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with both the Sheriff’s Department and SLOPD, which is an agreement between public agencies to share resources and information among themselves in response to a large-scale emergency (Torres 2009). 4.13.1.3 Public Schools The San Luis Coastal Unified School District (SLCUSD) provides educational services for the City, the City of Morro Bay, and a portion of the unincorporated areas of the County. The SLCUSD serves nearly 7,200 pre-K-12 students at 15 schools, which include ten elementary schools, two middle schools, and three high schools. SLCUSD also provides one adult school SLCUSD 2010). The schools that would most likely serve the Project area include: C.L. Smith Elementary, Hawthorne Elementary, Sinsheimer Elementary, Laguna Middle, and San Luis Obispo High (Holmes 2009). SLCUSD currently provides intra-district open enrollment, which allows parents a request to enroll their children at any district school; the district approves requests on a space-available basis. 4.13.1.4 Energy California’s main energy sources are electricity, natural gas, and crude oil. The total electricity used in the State in 2009 was generated from several sources including: approximately 42.0 percent from natural gas, 13.1 percent from nuclear reactions, 9.1 percent from large (non- renewable) hydroelectric power, 8.1 percent from coal, 12.0 percent from renewable sources, and 15.7 percent from unspecified sources (CEC 2011). As shown in Table 4.13-1, the County consumed approximately 1,749 million kilowatt-hours of electricity in 2008 and 1,691 million kilowatt-hours of electricity in 2009. The County consumed approximately 78.8 million therms of natural gas in 2008 and 79.4 million therms in 2009. As the population in California grows over the next few years, energy consumption is anticipated to 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-8 increase steadily at a rate of 1.2 percent annually for electricity from 2010 to 2018, and 0.73 percent annually for natural gas (CEC 2009). Table 4.13-1 San Luis Obispo County Electricity and Gas Consumption Land Use 2010 2011 Electricity millions of kWh) Gas millions of Therms) Electricity millions of kWh) Gas millions of Therms) Non–Residential 990 38.5 1,014 39.6 Residential 660 40.5 660 41.2 Total 1,650 79 1,674 80.8 Source: California Consumption Data Management System, accessed from: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx, and http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx on April 23 2013 Electricity and Gas Purveyors Pacific Gas and Electric Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) currently provides electricity for the Project Site. PG&E operates a local planning office at 406 Higuera Street in the City and operates the San Luis Obispo Substation on the corner of Orcutt Road and Johnson Avenue; approximately 2.8 miles northwest of the Project Site (see Figure 4.13-1). PG&E generates electricity from the following sources: (1) PG&E-owned hydropower, gas-fired steam, and nuclear generators; (2) independent generators; and (3) out-of state generators. A network of high-voltage transmission lines carries electricity generated from the power plants to substations. Substations use transformers to decrease the voltage of electricity to connect with the distribution system. Individual services or “drops” connect the distribution system to the industrial, commercial, agricultural, and residential customers. Table 4.13-2 shows kilowatt-hours of electricity consumed in the PG&E planning area from 2003 through 2011. As shown in the table, commercial, industrial, and residential land uses consumed the majority of the kilowatt-hours of electricity in the PG&E planning area. Currently, electrical service in the Project area is considered reliable (Queen 2009). Southern California Gas Southern California Gas (SCG) would provide natural gas for the Project Site. As discussed in Chapter 2.0, Project Description, SCG owns a 4-inch-diameter gas line just north of Tank Farm Road. The line is buried in the shoulder of the road and ends approximately 400 feet from the west boundary of the Northwest Operations Area. Currently, gas is not provided on the Project Site. Table 4.13-3 shows the natural gas consumption (in millions of therms) by the entire SCG planning area from 2003 through 2011. Residential, mining, and industrial land uses consumed the majority of the therms in the SCG planning area. Currently, gas service in the Project area is considered reliable (SCG 2010). 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-9 Table 4.13-2 PG&E Planning Area Electricity Consumption (Millions of kWh) Land Use 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Agriculture & Water Pump 6,324 6,778 5,402 6,010 7,908 7,908 7,659 7,182 5,930 Commercial Building 35,243 35,741 35,819 36,943 39,191 39,474 37,491 37,890 37,039 Commercial Other 4,682 4,987 5,113 5,407 5,394 5,910 6,193 6,018 6,283 Industry 17,954 18,352 18,619 18,561 19,011 18,678 17,226 17,247 16,987 Mining & Construction 2,477 2,642 2,863 2,912 3,521 3,461 3,429 3,605 4,005 Residential 31,976 32,708 33,106 34,345 34,324 35,320 34,939 34,625 35,086 Streetlight 516 532 537 542 457 475 511 515 499 Total Usage 99,172 101,740 101,459 104,720 109,806 111,226 107,448 107,082 105,829 Source: California Consumption Data Management System, accessed from: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyplan.aspx, on April 23, 2013. Table 4.13-3 SCG Planning Area Gas Consumption (Millions of Therms) Land Use 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Agriculture & Water Pump 102 101 85 87 86 83 79 66 63 Commercial Building 939 968 965 939 948 886 889 923 938 Commercial Other 77 66 71 88 107 135 133 131 130 Industry 1,529 1,569 1,578 1,458 1,527 1,565 1,450 1,588 1,584 Mining & Construction 2,608 2,636 2,427 2,536 2,369 2,406 2,309 2,135 2,126 Residential 2,558 2,685 2,536 2,544 2,568 2,533 2,492 2,596 2,620 Total Usage 7,813 8,025 7,662 7,652 7,605 7,608 7,352 7,439 7,461 Source: California Consumption Data Management System, accessed from: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbyplan.aspx, on April 23, 2013. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-10 4.13.1.5 Solid Waste It is anticipated that landfills, notably Cold Canyon Landfill, would serve the Project during the construction and operation phases. However, during the remediation component of the Project, it is anticipated that most hydrocarbon-impacted soils will be disposed of at the nonhazardous impacted soil (NHIS) facility operated by the City of Santa Maria. This section analyzes the existing conditions of, and Project impacts to, the landfills that could be affected by the Project, based on landfill capacities reported by The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). All NHIS material bound for the Santa Maria Landfill must be laboratory tested by the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to ensure it is within the landfill’s non- hazardous acceptance criteria. In the event that some of the soil is determined to be hazardous, that soil would have to be diverted to a hazardous waste disposal facility such as Clean Harbor’s Class I disposal facility in Buttonwillow, California. As a contingency plan, this EIR evaluates the possible disposal of 50,000 cubic yards of soil at the Class I disposal facility at Buttonwillow, located approximately 106 miles northeast of the Project Site, should material removed during remediation phases prove to be considered hazardous. An alternative Class I hazardous waste disposal facility, Kettleman Hills, is located at Kettleman City, California. As of December 2012, the Kettleman Hills facility identifies an available capacity of approximately 50,000 cubic yards Kettleman Hills 2012). The proposed Kettleman Hills Landfill B-18 Phase III expansion, if approved, would add 4.9 million cubic yards of capacity, increasing the total capacity to approximately 15 million cubic yards. Santa Barbara County The Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Group helped develop long- term solid waste management strategies for the communities within Santa Barbara County. The Santa Maria Landfill is one of the Technical Advisory Committee subgroups (SB County 2013). It is anticipated that NHIS material removed from the Project Site during the remediation component of the proposed Project, would be hauled to the Santa Maria Landfill for disposal. The City of Santa Maria owns and operates the Santa Maria Landfill, which accepts wastes 7 days per week. The landfill’s permitted maximum disposal is 858 tons per day (304,590 tons/year). In 2009, the landfill disposed of 95,580 tons of solid waste, none of which were reported to be from the San Luis Obispo IWMA (CalRecycle 2011). Since it accepts NHIS material, the Santa Maria Landfill is one of the most highly regulated sites in the area (City of Santa Maria 2007). All NHIS material must be tested at a laboratory to ensure it is within the landfill’s acceptance criteria, which were established by the RWQCB. NHIS material from the County has been going to the Santa Maria Landfill. San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo County consists of seven incorporated cities and numerous unincorporated areas within its 3,304 square miles and has a population of 269,637 people (2010 estimate) (US Census 2011). Each jurisdiction of the County is responsible for its own solid waste management. Solid waste generated in the County is mostly residential waste, construction waste, commercial and industrial waste, and sludge residues (waste remaining at the end of the sewage treatment process). In most cases, solid waste is hauled directly to major Class III 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-11 landfills, and the remainder is taken to transfer stations, resource recovery centers, and composting facilities. In 2010, California’s estimated 37.2 million residents disposed of about 30.4 million tons of solid waste for an estimated statewide daily disposal rate of 4.5 pounds per person. Although CalRecycle has not yet reviewed the 2010 disposal rate reported by San Luis Obispo IWMA, in 2009, the County disposed of approximately 231,439 tons of solid waste. Based on the County’s 2009 population of 270,429, the County daily disposal rate for 2009 was 4.4 pounds per resident. This is a reduction from the daily disposal rates of the previous two which were 5.4 (2007) and 4.8 (2008) pounds per person, respectively. The disposal rates for each of these three years are well below the most current San Luis Obispo IWMA disposal rate target of 7.4 pounds per resident per day. This target rate is calculated by CalRecycle to establish the upper limit of solid waste disposal allowable in order to maintain compliance with the intent of AB 939 (CalRecycle 2011.). According to 2009 CalRecycle data, the County utilizes several disposal facilities located in multiple jurisdictions including landfills in the following counties: Kern, King, Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Solana. The 2009 CalRecycle data also shows that San Luis Obispo County landfills accepted waste from three separate counties (San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Monterey). Table 4.13-4 shows that solid waste is disposed of at three Class III landfills within the County Cold Canyon, Chicago Grade, and City of Paso Robles). In 2009, a total of approximately 633 tons per day were disposed of at these landfills as shown in Table 4.13-4, or about 29.5 percent of the average total permitted daily capacity. According to CalRecycle’s Facility/Site Summary Details for these three facilities, approximately 15.5 million cubic yards, or 59.8 percent of permitted solid waste disposal capacity, remained available at landfills in the County CalRecycle 2011). Table 4.13-4 San Luis Obispo County Class III Landfill Capacity and Usage Landfill 1 Permitted Daily Capacity tons)2 2009 Total Solid Waste Disposal (tons)3 2009 Average Daily Disposal tons)a Maximum Permitted Capacity cubic yards)2 Estimated Remaining Permitted Capacity b cubic yards) Cold Canyon 1,200 136,574 385 10,900,000 1,830,000 Chicago Grade 500 56,706 160 8,950,220 8,329,699 City of Paso Robles 450 31,161 88 6,495,000 5,327,500 Total 2,150 224,441 633 26,345,220 15,487,199 a. The average daily disposal for each landfill was found by dividing the 2009 total solid waste disposal by the approximate number of days the landfill opened per year. Excluding holidays, these landfills are open every day of the year. Federal Law (5 U.S.C. 6103) establishes 10 legal public holidays a year. b. The remaining capacity for each landfill was estimated on the following dates: Cold Canyon Landfill, June 02, 2010; Chicago Grade Landfill, May 1, 2007; and City of Paso Robles Landfill, May 1, 2007. Source: CalRecycle (Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Facility/Site Listing, Facility/Site Summary Details, and Active Landfills Profile – Operations). Accessed from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov on July 8, 2011 and April 26, 2013. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-12 Throughout Project construction and operation phases, the Cold Canyon Landfill will probably be the primary landfill serving the Project Site. The San Luis Garbage Company is the franchised garbage collection, transport, and recycling provider for San Luis Obispo County. The Cold Canyon Landfill is located approximately 6 miles south of the City on State Route 227. The landfill operates 7 days per week. The Cold Canyon Landfill is a Class III landfill and currently operates on Solid Waste Permit Facility # 40-AA-0004 (issued January 29, 2002). The facility accepts or permits: agricultural waste, construction and demolition waste, dead animals, industrial waste, mixed municipal waste, tires, contaminated soil, green materials, inert waste, and sludge (biosolids). Based on the figures provided in Table 4.13-4, in 2009, the landfill operated at approximately 32 percent of its permitted daily capacity. As of June 2010, the landfill had a remaining capacity of approximately 1.83 million cubic yards. Under the existing permit, the anticipated closure date for the landfill is January 2014. However, in November 2012, the Board of Supervisors approved a proposal to expand the landfill’s disposal-area footprint by approximately 46 acres (to total 134 acres), creating capacity for an additional 13.1 million cubic yards, and increase the total facility allowable tonnage limit from 1,620 to 2,050 tons per day (430 tons per day), which would extend the landfill operation date until the year 2040. This increase would accommodate anticipated increases in recyclable materials and maintain existing disposal limits. With the approval of this Conditional Use Permit by the County, the next step is to bring the expansion proposal before CalRecycle, which would rely on the Cold Canyon Landfill Expansion FEIR to (a) issue either a revised Solid Waste Facility Permit (SWFP) for the Landfill; (b) issue a new SWFP for the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and Resource Recovery Park (RRP); or (c) consolidate all of the solid waste handling activity under one revised SWFP (SLO County 2012; Cold Canyon FEIR 2012). Chicago Grade Landfill The Chicago Grade Landfill, open 7 days per week, is a 45.4-acre permitted landfill on a 188- acre parcel at 2290 Homestead Road in Templeton, California. The Chicago Grade Landfill is also a Class III facility and was recently expanded in the fall of 2007. As shown in Table 4.13-4, the current permitted daily maximum capacity is 500 tons, and in 2009, total waste disposal in the landfill was approximately 56,706 tons. The Chicago Grade Landfill accepts or permits: agricultural waste, construction and demolition waste, contaminated soil, food wastes, industrial waste, metals, tires, asbestos, dead animals, green materials, inert waste, mixed municipal waste, and sludge (biosolids). The landfill is scheduled to close in 2042. Paso Robles Landfill. The City of Paso Robles owns and operates the Paso Robles Landfill, 8.5 miles east of Paso Robles off of State Route 46. As indicated in Table 4.13.4, the Paso Robles Landfill’s permitted daily maximum capacity is 450 tons, which was recently expanded from 250 tons in Solid Waste Facility Permit #40-AA-0001 (issued January 23, 2008). In 2009, total waste disposal in the landfill was 31,161 tons. The landfill is scheduled to close in 2051. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-13 4.13.1.6 City Water Supply The City is the sole water purveyor within the City’s limits. This allows the City to maintain uniformity of water service and distribution standards, and to be consistent in developing and implementing water policy. As the sole water purveyor, the City maintains control over water quality, distribution, and service to users of the system, as well as ensuring consistency with the City's 2010 General Plan policies and goals. The Water and Wastewater Management Element of the General Plan (WWME), first adopted in 1987 and most recently updated in 2010, identifies multiple water projects to meet projected short and long-term water demand. Having several sources of water avoids dependence on any one source that may not be available during a drought or other water supply reduction or emergency. There is usually greater reliability and flexibility if sources are of different types such as surface water and groundwater) and if the sources of one type are in different locations such as reservoirs in different watersheds). With the update of the WWME in 2010, the City Council reaffirmed the policy for a multi- source water supply. Consistent with the multi-source water supply concept, the City obtains water from five sources: Salinas Reservoir (Santa Margarita Lake), Whale Rock Reservoir, Nacimiento Reservoir, recycled water from the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF), and a limited amount of groundwater. Table 4.13.5 summarizes the City’s Water Resource Availability. More information on the City water supply sources is provided in Appendix G.1. Table 4.13.5 City Water Source Availability Water Resources 2010 Annual Availability Salinas Reservoir (Santa Margarita Lake) and Whale Rock Reservoir 6,940 acre-feet Safe Annual Yield Nacimiento Reservoir 3,380 acre-feet Contractual Limit Recycled Water 130 acre-feet 2009 Annual Usage Siltation to 2060 500 acre-feet Policy A4.2.2 Total Annual Availability 9,950 acre-feet Source: City 2011 On-site water wells would be used for the remediation component of the proposed Project and for the County Development Plan. Impacts associated with this water use are discussed in Section 4.5, Water Resources. The impacts associated with water use for the City Development Plan are discussed below since water would be supplied to the Project from City utilities. 4.13.2 Regulatory Setting 4.13.2.1 Federal Regulations No federal public service or utility regulations are applicable to the Project. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-14 4.13.2.2 State Regulations California Code of Regulations Sections 17620 and 65995 California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 17620 authorizes school districts to levy a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement against any construction of new residential, commercial, and industrial uses within their boundaries to fund the construction of new schools or school facilities. CCR Section 65995 limits the maximum fee that school districts can assess. California Public Utilities Commission The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) regulates privately-owned telecommunications, electric, natural gas, water, railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies. CPUC is responsible for ensuring that California utility customers have safe, reliable utility service at reasonable rates; protecting utility customers from fraud; and promoting the health of California’s economy. CPUC establishes service standards and safety rules and authorizes utility rate changes, as well as enforcing CEQA compliance for utility construction. California Integrated Waste Management Act The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) was enacted to reduce, recycle, and reuse solid waste generated in the state to the maximum amount feasible (California Public Resources Code Section 40000 et seq.). Specifically, the Act requires City and County jurisdictions to identify an implementation schedule to divert 25 percent of their total solid waste stream from landfill disposal by the year 1995, and 50 percent of the total waste stream by the year 2000. The Act also requires each City and County to promote source reduction, recycling, and safe disposal or transformation. Senate Bill 1374 Senate Bill (SB) 1374 requires that the annual report submitted to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), now known as CalRecycle, includes a summary of the progress made in diversion of construction and demolition waste materials. In addition, SB 1374 requires the CIWMB to adopt a model ordinance, suitable for adoption by any local agency, requiring 50 percent to 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition waste materials from landfills by March 1, 2004. Local jurisdictions are not required to adopt their own construction and demolition ordinances, nor are they required to adopt CIWMB’s model by default. However, CIWMB may consider adoption of such an ordinance when determining whether to impose a fine on a jurisdiction that has failed to implement its Source Reduction and Recycling Element. For the 2006 reporting year, the biennial review showed that the County was at an approximate 63 percent diversion rate (CalRecycle 2013). California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11, Section 4.408 – 2010 California Green Building Standards Code The 2010 California Green Building Standards Code Section 4.408 requires construction projects to recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 50 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris, or meet a local construction and demolition waste management ordinance, whichever is more stringent. Section 4.408.2 of this Code lists details of a required construction waste management plan and required documentation to be provided to an enforcing agency to demonstrate compliance. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-15 4.13.2.3 County Regulations Public Facilities Fees Ordinance, Title 18 of the San Luis Obispo County Code The County of San Luis Obispo Public Facilities Fees Ordinance, Title 18 of the County Code, allows the County to collect fees for new development projects within the County to mitigate impacts caused by such projects. The County uses the fees to finance the new development’s fair share of public facilities (e.g., parks, libraries, and fire and police stations). County of San Luis Obispo Public Facilities Financing Plan for Unincorporated Area Facilities The County of San Luis Obispo Public Facilities Financing Plan for Unincorporated Area Facilities documents the number and cost of new capital facilities required to serve development in unincorporated areas through 2025. One potential source of funding is public facilities fees paid by new developments to fund their fair share of necessary facilities. The Public Facilities Financing Plan identifies the maximum justified level of those fees. The fees finance public capital facilities (including land purchases, construction of buildings, and the purchase of major equipment) and ensure that new development projects contribute their fair share for these facilities. The fees cannot fund employee salaries. County Fire Standards The County is under the jurisdiction of CALFIRE, which utilized the California Code of Regulation, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 10, to regulate construction blasting with requirements such as the use of mats (if use is close to homes, roadways, etc) or fire fighting measures if blasting is conducted during the dry season. The California Fire Code (version 2010) refers to the CCR Title 19, but also specifies requirements related to construction blasting, including the use of fire hoses. The County, and other jurisdictions in the County, adopted both the California Fire Code (CFC) and the California Building Code (CBC), with amendments, into local ordinance. These local ordinances include but are not necessarily limited to: Water requirements; Minimum access road requirements; Construction requirements; Hazard abatement; and Turnaround requirements. San Luis Obispo County General Plan Safety Element The San Luis Obispo County General Plan Safety Element identified Policy S-14 Facilities, Equipment and Personnel as applicable to the proposed Project (see Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis, for an analysis of the proposed Project’s consistency with this policy). The policy ensures that adequate facilities, equipment, and personnel are available to meet the demands of firefighting in the County, based on the level of service set forth in the fire agency’s master plan. San Luis Obispo County General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element Chapter 5 of the Conservation and Open Space Element contains the County’s energy policy. The purpose of the energy policy is to (1) increase energy efficiency in the County; (2) provide 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-16 policy guidance regarding the implications of energy use; (3) document the County’s energy resources; (4) determine land use and environmental criteria for evaluating future energy projects; and (5) provide alternatives that encourage exceeding the State’s energy regulations for new construction. Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis, discusses the proposed Project’s consistency with applicable policies. San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority Ordinance No. 2008-3 The purpose of this ordinance is to establish requirements for recycling materials generated from residential facilities, commercial facilities, and special events, to comply with Assembly Bill AB) 939, which required diverting 50 percent of all solid waste from landfill disposal as of January 1, 2000. This ordinance describes how recyclables are to be collected from each type of facility, and allows the IWMA to sample refuse for substantial compliance (less than 20 percent of recyclables in containers destined for landfills). Non-compliance can result in warnings, and continued violations from multi-family residential, commercial, and special events, could result in civil penalties of $1,000 per day on which a violation exists. These requirements should increase diversion of recyclable materials from landfill disposal, reduce greenhouse gas emissions by recycling more materials, and avoid the administrative civil penalties of up to 10,000 per day for failure to comply with AB 939 requirements. Health and Sanitation Code, Title 8 of the San Luis Obispo County Code The County of San Luis Obispo Health and Sanitation Code, Chapter 8.12, Solid Waste Management, enforces necessary and reasonable policies and procedures with respect to the accumulation, collection, transportation, processing, recycling, and disposal of various types of solid waste. 4.13.2.4 City Regulations City of San Luis Obispo Safety Element These policies and performance standards are applicable to the Project. 3.0 Policy S: Adequate Fire Services Development should be approved only when adequate fire suppression services and facilities are available or will be made available concurrent with development, considering the setting, type, intensity, and form of the proposed development. 9.3 Program S: Response Performance Standards The SLOFD set a response-time objective of four minutes. The Fire Department’s standard of coverage recommends that a three-person engine company, with paramedic, meet this standard 95 percent of the time. The SLOPD set a 30 percent available-time objective for patrol response. Available time is the fraction of total time that a patrol unit is not previously assigned or otherwise unavailable for response to a new emergency call for service. City Fire Standards The City adopted both the CFC and the CBC, with amendments, into local ordinance. These local ordinances include but are not necessarily limited to: 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-17 Water requirements; Minimum access road requirements; Construction requirements; Hazard abatement; and Turnaround requirements. City of San Luis Obispo Construction and Demolition Debris Ordinance (No. 1381, Chapter 8.05) This ordinance applies to all construction and renovation projects with a valuation of $50,000 or higher and also for projects of 1,000 square feet or greater. Projects under the ordinance must recycle at least 50 percent of the waste generated from the project. Failure to meet this goal may result in a civil penalty of two percent of the project valuation. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, Chapter 17.18, Performance Standards - Section 17.18.080, Energy Conservation (Ordinance 1265) This ordinance requires minimization of conventional energy sources for space heating and cooling, water heating, and illumination with proper design and orientation, including provision and protection of solar exposure. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, Chapter 17.18, Performance Standards - Section 17.18.070, Solid Waste (Ordinance 1265) This ordinance requires solid wastes to be handled and stored to prevent nuisances, health and fire hazards, and to facilitate recycling. Suitable containers should prevent animals from scattering trash and weather from blowing trash. Suitable space and containers should encourage on-site sorting and collection of recyclables. City of San Luis Obispo Explosive Materials (No. 3301.1, Chapter 15) This ordinance applies to the manufacture, possession, storage, sale, transportation, handling or use of explosive materials and the manufacture of explosive material and/or all fireworks and prohibits the use of explosives in the City, with no exceptions for construction related blasting. City of San Luis Obispo Conservation and Open Space Element The Conservation and Open Space Element is a tool to protect and preserve unique community resources. Its overarching goal is to protect resources (such as air and water, wildlife habitat, scenic and agricultural lands, watershed, and historic features) with a secondary goal of accommodating passive recreation where it will not harm the environment or interfere with agricultural operations. The proposed Project’s consistency with applicable policies is discussed in Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis. 4.13.3 Significance Criteria The following criteria are based on the City and County’s Initial Study and Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. The effects of the Project on public services, utilities, and service systems would be considered significant if the Project would: Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-18 environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire protection, police protection, and public schools; Be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project’s solid waste disposal needs; Fail to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste; or Use a substantial amount of fuel or energy that would: Consume energy beyond PG&E or SCG capacity to supply or produce; Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans; or Result in the construction or operations of a project that would use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. 4.13.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The remediation component of the Project would occur on predominantly vacant land that is currently unused. The remediation activities would include excavating contaminated soils, capping affected areas to separate them from potential human and ecological receptors, and off- site disposal of contaminated soils, which would generate an estimated 10,500 truck trips (round trips) over a period of 2.5 years. The Applicant has requested a 25 percent contingency be added to this number to account for the uncertainties associated with estimating impacted soil volumes for remediation projects. This would increase the number to 13,125 round trips. Ongoing aspects of the remediation include monitoring groundwater, and imposing deed restrictions that prevent residential development and restrict groundwater use at the Project Site. 4.13.4.1 Remediation - Fire Protection Services Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.1 Additional truck trips or construction activities could interfere with fire protection emergency vehicle response times along Tank Farm Road. Remediation Class III Response times of emergency vehicles in the area could be impacted by construction activity or additional truck trips on Tank Farm Road during remediation activities. However, the Project would not result in closures of Tank Farm Road or Santa Fe Road. Furthermore, emergency response providers near the Project Site would be notified in advance of exact construction locations, potential lane closure schedules, and potential alternate routes. Traffic safety procedures will be implemented to avoid disruption to fire protection services’ access through the area during the remediation component of the proposed Project. At a minimum, there would likely be a flagman and signs controlling traffic crossing Tank Farm Road. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-19 The implementation of traffic safety procedures and notification of emergency response providers of exact construction locations would allow emergency agencies to maintain their current response times without the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities. Blasting is proposed for the Flower Mound area located in the northeast portion of the Project Site. Current County codes, as per the CCR and California Fire Code, regulate the use of blasting agents near occupied structures and the requirements for fire protection equipment. These requirements would be overseen by the County Fire Marshal. As portions of the Flower Mound are within the City, which prohibits the use of explosives, even for construction, the City Fire Marshal would need to be consulted before blasting within the City boundaries. However, as the permit would be issued by the County for the Project restoration, the City Fire Marshal has indicated that compliance with County requirements would be sufficient to allow for blasting (as per verbal discussion with Mr. Maggio, City Fire Marshal). Therefore, impacts resulting from the remediation component of the Project on fire protection services would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure The following mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce impacts on fire protection services generated by the Project. PS/U-1 The Applicant shall incorporate the following in the construction traffic management plan for review and approval by the City and County Public Works departments: Advance notification of emergency response providers near the Project Site of exact construction locations, potential lane closure schedules, and potential alternate routes. In order to avoid disruption to fire protection services’ access through the area, traffic safety procedures, including, but not limited to, flagmen and signs controlling traffic crossing Tank Farm Road. Residual Impact Due to the remediation component of the proposed Project’s less than significant impacts on emergency vehicle response times and the temporary nature of the remediation activities, residual impacts on fire protection services would be less than significant (Class III). 4.13.4.2 Remediation - Police Protection Services Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.2 Additional truck trips or construction activities could interfere with police protection emergency vehicle response times along Tank Farm Road. Remediation Class III Response times of emergency vehicles in the area could be impacted by construction activities or additional truck trips on Tank Farm Road during remediation activities. However, the Project Description states that remediation activities would not result in closures of Tank Farm Road or 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-20 Santa Fe Road. Furthermore, emergency response providers near the Project Site would be notified in advance of exact construction locations, potential lane closure schedules, and potential alternate routes. Traffic safety procedures will be implemented to avoid disruption to fire protection services access through the area during the Project’s remediation and construction phases. At a minimum, there would likely be a flagman and signs controlling traffic crossing Tank Farm Road. The implementation of traffic safety procedures and notification of emergency response providers of exact construction locations would allow emergency agencies to maintain their current response times without the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities. Therefore, impacts resulting from the remediation component of the Project on police protection services would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure Implement mitigation measure PS/U-1 in order to further reduce the impacts on police protection services generated by the Project. Residual Impact Due to the remediation component of the Project’s less than significant impacts on emergency vehicle response times and the finite nature of the remediation activities, residual impacts on police protection services would be less than significant (Class III). 4.13.4.3 Remediation - Public Schools As stated above, the remediation component of the Project would occur on predominantly vacant land that is currently unused. The remediation activities would include excavating contaminated soils, capping affected areas to separate them from potential human and ecological receptors, and off-site disposal of contaminated soils. These activities will not generate any additional students for the schools in the area. Additionally, the Project Site is farther than one-quarter mile from any school and would have no impact on schools regarding the removal of contaminated soils. Therefore, the proposed remediation actions would not have an impact on schools that would require new or physically altered facilities to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives, and as such, there would be no impact on schools. 4.13.4.4 Remediation - Energy Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.3 Construction equipment could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Remediation Class III Remediation actions at the Project Site would involve the use of earth-moving machinery and associated motorized equipment and trucks. The types of equipment utilized for the remediation activities, such as bulldozers, excavators, and dump trucks, are typically self-propelled and do not require connection to energy utilities. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-21 The remediation component of the Project would be occurring on land that is vacant with the exception of four buildings that are proposed to be demolished. Any existing energy utility lines would be disconnected and abandoned. Therefore, remediation activities would have no effect on energy utilities and would not consume energy beyond PG&E or SCG’s capacity to supply or produce. In addition, due to the temporary nature of the remediation component’s timeframe, the remediation actions would not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans or result in the construction or operations of a project that would use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. However, one of the goals of the San Luis Obispo County General Plan’s Conservation and Open Space Element is to increase energy efficiency in the County. Therefore, to achieve greater energy efficiency with the use of soil remediation equipment, mitigation measure PS/U-3 is recommended. Mitigation Measure The following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce impacts to energy resources generated by the Project. PS/U-3 To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. Residual Impact With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measure, impacts resulting from the remediation component of the Project on energy supplies would be considered less than significant (Class III). 4.13.4.5 Remediation - Solid Waste Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.4 Remediation activities would generate solid waste requiring disposal at landfills. Remediation Class III It is estimated that the remediation component of the Project could generate up to 157,000 cubic yards (42,390 tons) of nonhazardous impacted soil (NHIS) that would need disposal. This material would be disposed of at the Santa Maria Landfill facility, located approximately 36 miles south of the Project Site. The Applicant indicates that grading and remediation activities would take 2.5 years to complete. As such, the remediation component of the Project would produce an average of 1,413 tons of soil to be disposed of per month (16,956 tons per year for the first two years), which would be approximately 5.6 percent of the permitted yearly throughput, or about 17.7 percent of the total amount of waste disposed at this landfill in 2009. To account for the uncertainties associated with estimating impacted soil volumes for remediation projects, the Applicant has requested a 25 percent contingency be added to the soil volume calculation. This would increase the quantity of NHIS soil requiring disposal to 196,000 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-22 cubic yards (approximately 52,988 tons), which if averaged over 2.5 years would deposit 21,195 tons yearly or approximately 7.0 percent of the landfill’s permitted yearly throughput. All NHIS material bound for the Santa Maria Landfill must be laboratory tested by methods approved by the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board to ensure it is within the landfill’s non-hazardous acceptance criteria. In the event that some of the soil is determined to be hazardous, that soil would have to be diverted to a hazardous waste disposal facility such as Clean Harbor’s Class I disposal facility in Buttonwillow, California or Waste Management’s Class I disposal facility (Kettleman Hills) in Kettleman City, California. As part of the Applicant’s Project, an evaluation of hazardous waste disposal facilities was conducted for disposal capacity of 50,000 cubic yards of soil, as a contingency plan in this Environmental Impact Report (EIR). As of August 2010, the Clean Harbors Buttonwillow facility projects that there will be adequate capacity for 50,000 cubic yards of soil by 2011 Atkinson 2010). As of December 2012, the Kettleman Hills facility identifies an available capacity of approximately 50,000 cubic yards (Kettleman Hills 2012). The proposed Kettleman Hills Landfill B-18 Phase III expansion, if approved, would add 4.9 million cubic yards of capacity, increasing the total capacity to approximately 15 million cubic yards. If the Project’s full contingency amount of 50,000 cubic yards were found to be hazardous, the Project would result in approximately 3,500 round trips to either the Buttonwillow or Kettleman Hills facility. Although the quantity of hazardous soil is unknown at this time, the amount of soil diverted to either Class I facility would lessen the burden on the NHIS Landfill in Santa Maria. In addition to the contaminated soil, four office buildings on the site, that are a combined 12,836 sq. ft., are proposed to be demolished during remediation. The County’s Construction & Demolition Recycling guidelines estimate that the buildings would generate approximately 70 lbs. of debris per square foot, for a total of 449 tons of demolition debris. Given the age of three of those buildings, it is assumed that lead-containing materials and asbestos-containing materials are present. During demolition, any suspect material would be presumed asbestos-containing and require abatement and eventual disposal at a licensed facility (e.g., Kettleman Hills or Buttonwillow) and would therefore lessen the burden on the local landfill. Once abatement activities are completed and hazardous materials are removed, recyclable materials would be segregated pursuant to AB 939, which requires that at least 50 percent of the demolition materials be diverted from the waste stream. Implementing a Solid Waste Management Plan as a standard mitigation measure would facilitate maximum diversion of recyclables. The remaining quantity of debris to be disposed of would then be a maximum of 224.5 tons of demolition waste, which would be approximately 0.16 percent of the annual amount disposed of at the Cold Canyon Landfill (2009), or 0.05 percent of the annual permitted throughput. There are also four locations on the site that have been designated by the Applicant for miscellaneous clean-up requiring demolition and removal/reuse of debris. They are comprised of debris or abandoned structures that are unattractive or would possibly pose physical hazards. Of these, two are debris piles along the north property line that appear to contain mostly concrete debris. The contractor would crush this material and reuse it for gravel elsewhere on the Project Site. Otherwise, the concrete would be hauled off-site for recycling or disposal. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-23 There is a historical debris disposal area adjacent to the North Marsh that is assumed to extend to a depth of 5 feet and that the excavation volume is 18,000 cubic yards. This material would be separated into concrete that will be recycled on-site, construction debris that will be sent to a landfill, and affected soils that would be sent to the Santa Maria Landfill for disposal. A fourth miscellaneous clean-up location is a concrete vault of uncertain purpose located on the southern parcel, south of Tank Farm Road. It is approximately 5 feet wide, 12 feet long, and 8 feet deep. A steel handrail would be removed and the upper three feet of the concrete wall would be broken and disposed in the bottom of the vault with a sand-cement slurry added to fill the void spaces. The remaining depth of the vault would be backfilled with common fill until the original grade is re-established. Based on these disposal estimates for soil and demolition materials, and recycling/reuse of materials from the miscellaneous clean-up sites, the remediation component of the Project will be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity. Additionally, all remediation activities regarding solid waste disposal would comply with all relevant statutes and regulations. It is unknown what quantity of soil, if any, would be diverted for hazardous waste disposal; however, as a contingency plan, the Class I disposal facility at Kettleman Hills or Buttonwillow, would have the capacity to accept the estimated quantity of hazardous remediation debris if necessary. Therefore, the Project’s solid waste impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure The following mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce impacts from solid wastes generated by the Project. PS/U-4 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall submit a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) for approval by the San Luis Obispo County IWMA (and the City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department if the City annexes the site prior to completion of the remediation component of the project) to maintain a diversion rate of at least 50 percent of construction waste from reaching the landfill. The County/City Monitor, IWMA (and the City Utilities Department if applicable) would also monitor the Applicant’s implementation of the SWMP and verify compliance with solid waste diversion requirements. The SWMP shall consist of information regarding, but not limited to: a. The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan; b. A brief description of the Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project; c. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map; d. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site-separated and hauled to 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-24 designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility); e. The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled; f. A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan; g. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume); h. Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection shall report on a quarterly basis; i. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices; j. Recycling information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices; and k. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. Residual Impact With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measure, impacts from solid wastes generated by the remediation component of the Project would be reduced to less than significant Class III). 4.13.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Implementation of the City Development Plan component of the Project would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space, and 370,000 sq. ft of service-commercial space. As shown in Table 2-9 of Chapter 2.0, Project Description, development for each of these land use designations under the City Development Plan would predominantly consist of offices and light manufacturing facilities respectively. The City Development Plan would occur in five phases and take place over a 20 to 25 year period, which would allow new public service facilities to be built concurrent with the Project and lessen some impacts the Project would have on Public Services. There are no residential uses proposed by the City Development Plan and as such, impacts that are generally driven by residential population increases, for example, would not be significant because no significant influx of residents would occur. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-25 4.13.5.1 City Development Plan - Fire Protection Services Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.5 Build-out of the City Development Plan could increase demand for fire protection services. Development Class II The City Development Plan could create increased demand for fire protection services due to structure fires, hazardous material spills associated with some of the possible commercial services land use that would be allowed by the City zoning, paramedic response, wildfire, etc. The Project Site is in a Moderate Fire Severity Zone, which means there is not a substantial wildfire hazard. The site is currently surrounded primarily by agricultural land, but the area is seeing increased levels of commercial and residential development. The Project Site also contains large wetland areas. All of these factors would reduce wildfire hazards for the Project Site. Development at the Project Site would have to meet all of the requirements of the City of San Luis Obispo Fire Standards and applicable provisions of the California Fire Code. This would include items such as installation of fire water supplies and hydrants throughout the development, building sprinklers, adequate fire department access, proper placement of street numbers, water supply capable of providing adequate fire flow, installation of fire protection systems and equipment in buildings, portable fire extinguishers, etc. According to the SLOFD Master Plan, the Project Site (as part of the City’s proposed Airport Annexation area) lacks four-minute primary unit response coverage for emergency calls. The nearest City fire station is located about 2.5 miles from the Project Site. However, the City has a mutual aid agreement with CALFIRE, and the response time for CALFIRE to the Project Site is about four minutes. The nearest CALFIRE station is located about two miles from the Project Site. In the short-term, by adhering to a reciprocal agreement that advises both CALFIRE and SLOFD to each send one fire engine during a fire emergency, adequate fire fighting resources would be provided for the Project Site. Given that the City Development Plan would occur over a 25-year period, and the fact that the SLOFD response time to the Project Site would not be consistent with the travel time standards adopted by the City in the SLOFD Master Plan, the impacts to fire protection services would be considered potentially significant. As stated above in Section 4.13.1, there are no development impact fees to pay for new fire department facilities in the City. The City currently relies on CALFIRE, through the mutual aid agreement, to offset some the response time deficiencies in the Project area and City-wide service ratios. Nevertheless, while the City benefits from the mutual aid response system, the SLOFD Master Plan suggests that this system should not be relied on as a long-term solution to the need for an additional City fire station. One of the possible land uses for this Project, listed in Table 2-9, is a 5,000 sq. ft. public fire station and training facility. Should this facility be developed, the Project’s fire protection impacts would be considered beneficial. However, it cannot be stated with certainty when, or if, such a facility would be provided and staffed by SLOFD. In the absence of such a new facility at 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-26 the Project Site, or elsewhere in the vicinity, the City would need to continue to rely on assistance from County fire suppression and paramedic units to provide adequate emergency response. Mitigation Measure PS/U-5a The Applicant shall deed to the City property at the Project Site that the City could use for the development of a public fire station. PS/U-5b Development shall only be approved when the City deems that adequate fire suppression services and facilities, consistent with adopted travel time standards, are available, or will be made available concurrent with development at the Project Site. If, at time of development it is determined that the development site is outside of adequate response time zones, feasible options to enhance emergency access to the development sites may include but are not limited to the following: a. Completion of transportation improvements that improve emergency services travel time to proposed development sites. b. Co-location of City fire services with existing CALFIRE facilities located on Broad Street c. Establishment of fire facilities within a closer proximity to the development site that meet or exceed adopted travel time standards. d. Developer/Applicant financing of other improvements that will contribute to alleviating current deficiencies as identified in the SLOFD Master Plan. Residual Impact The City Development Plan impacts on fire protection services would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.13.5.2 City Development Plan - Police Protection Services Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.6 Build-out of the City Development Plan land uses would create an incrementally higher demand for police protection services. Development Class III The City Development Plan component of the Project would create 803,000 sq. ft. of commercial facilities that include business park space, retail stores, and service or light manufacturing facilities on predominantly vacant property. By introducing capital facilities where none exist, along with employees that would staff those facilities, the Project would potentially increase the demand for police services to protect lives and property. As reported by the SLOPD, existing staff levels are adequate to meet the demands of the community; however, a department objective of being available 30 percent of the time is not currently being met much of the year. As service demands associated with development in the Project area increase, additional staffing resources may need to be put in place to insure that the area receives the same level of service as the rest of the community. However, the development 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-27 of the City Development Plan would require no new or physically altered governmental facilities to accommodate additional officers that may be needed in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives. Therefore, impacts on City police protection services would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impact Implementation of the City Development Plan component of the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities for police protection services. The Project’s residual impact on police protection services is less than significant (Class III). 4.13.5.3 City Development Plan - Public Schools The City Development Plan component of the Project would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space and limited retail space, and 370,000 sq. ft. for service and light manufacturing businesses. There are no residential uses proposed by the City Development Plan and no sizeable influx of school age children would occur. As no portion of the City Development Plan would increase the population of school children residing at the site, development of the proposed Project would not have an impact on schools that would require new or physically altered facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on schools. 4.13.5.4 City Development Plan - Energy Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.7 Construction and operation of the City Development Plan could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Development Class III The City Development Plan would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space, and 370,000 sq. ft of service and light manufacturing businesses. Energy usage estimates would vary based on the types of businesses that would occupy the commercial space that the City Development Plan would provide. Electrical service in the Project area is considered reliable by PG&E, which serves the Project area and owns a substation approximately 2.8 miles to the northwest that could supply electricity for the Project. At full build-out, the projected electricity demand created by the Project would be 14.9 million kilowatt hours (MkWh) as shown in Table 4.13-6. This would be an increase of approximately 0.025 percent over the current level of use in the PG&E planning area. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-28 Table 4.13-6 Estimated Project Electricity Usage – City Development Plan Land Use sq. ft. Annual Electricity Use kWh/sq.ft.) Annual Project Electricity Usage (MkWh) a Office Park 348,000 17.7 6.16 Manufacturing 170,000 20.02 3.40 Lodging (115 rooms) 70,000 12.13 0.85 Industrial Park 50,000 20.02 1.00 Warehousing/Indoor Storage 50,000 20.02 1.00 Wholesale/Distribution 50,000 20.02 1.00 Vehicle Service 20,000 20.02 0.40 Retail 15,000 14.06 0.21 Film Processing 10,000 17.7 0.18 Printing 10,000 17.7 0.18 Public Transit Maintenance 10,000 20.02 0.20 Public Fire Station/Training Facility 5,000 7.46 0.04 Specialized Education/Training 5,000 7.46 0.04 Veterinary Clinic 5,000 19.61 0.10 Recreation (baseball fields) - - 0.15 Project Total Annual Electricity Usage 14.9 a. MkWh – Million kilowatt hours Sources: (1) California Energy Commission. 2006. Report No. CEC-400-2006-005; (2) FCPA 2005 Natural gas service in the area is provided by SCG, which indicates that their services in the Project area are considered reliable. The projected natural gas demand created by the proposed Project would be 137,535 therms as shown in Table 4.13-7. This would be an increase of approximately 0.002 percent over the current level of use in the SCG planning area. Although natural gas is not currently provided on the Project Site, SCG owns a gas line along Tank Farm Road that ends approximately 400 feet from the west boundary of the site, which could be accessed to supply natural gas service to the Project area. The Applicant would be responsible for constructing the gas line extension and payment of connection fees for gas service. Both utilities report reliable service levels in the Project area, therefore, it is not expected that the development of the Project’s commercial facilities would consume energy beyond the capacity of PG&E or SCG to supply or produce. In addition, however, the Project must be found consistent with San Luis Obispo Municipal Code – Section 17.18.080 that requires new developments to minimize usage of conventional energy sources for space heating and cooling, water heating, and illumination with proper design and orientation to the extent feasible, including provision and protection of solar exposure. By adhering to these energy saving design requirements, the Project will not be in conflict with energy conservation plans (see Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis), or result in the construction or operations of a project that would use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on energy supplies. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-29 Table 4.13-7 Estimated Natural Gas Usage – City Development Plan Land Use sq. ft. Annual natural Gas Use therms/sq. ft.) Project natural Gas Usage therms) Office Park 348,000 0.22 76,560 Manufacturing 170,000 0.06 10,200 Lodging 70,000 0.42 29,400 Industrial Park 50,000 0.06 3,000 Warehousing/Indoor Storage 50,000 0.06 3,000 Wholesale/Distribution 50,000 0.06 3,000 Vehicle Service 20,000 0.06 1,200 Retail 15,000 0.05 750 Film Processing 10,000 0.22 2,200 Printing 10,000 0.22 2,200 Public Transit Maintenance 10,000 0.06 600 Public Fire Station/Training Facility 5,000 0.16 800 Specialized Education/Training 5,000 0.16 800 Veterinary Clinic 5,000 0.76 3,800 Recreation (baseball fields) 500 0.05 25 Total Project Annual Natural Gas Usage 137,535 Source: California Energy Commission. 2006. Report No. CEC-400-2006-005 Mitigation Measure The following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce impacts on energy resources generated by the Project. PS/U-7a If additional electrical or natural gas energy infrastructure is required to accommodate the proposed Project, the Applicant would be required to pay a fee to PG&E or SCG respectively, to provide additional service. PS/U-7b To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. PS/U-7c The Applicant shall comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with all adopted City policies regarding energy consumption such as: a. Incorporating cost-effective, renewable, energy resources into the Project; b. Providing passive features through site design that allows shade to reduce unwanted heat gain, thereby reducing the need to use energy for cooling; and c. Installation of energy efficient appliances, heat recovery equipment, and building energy management systems. Residual Impact With the implementation of standard regulatory procedures and recommended mitigation measures, all impacts on energy supplies would be reduced to less than significant (Class III). 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-30 4.13.5.5 City Development Plan - Solid Waste Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.8 Construction and operation of the City Development Plan could generate significant amounts of solid waste. Development Class III Construction Impacts The City Development Plan would create commercial and light industry facilities, which generate solid waste during construction at an estimated rate of 4.34 lbs. per square foot (USEPA 2009). Table 2-11 lists a possible land use mix to be developed under the City Development Plan with a total floor space of 803,000 square feet. Solid waste produced by this Project during construction would then be approximately 1,743 tons (803,000 sq. ft. x 4.34 lbs./sq. ft. x .0005 tons/lb.) over the 20 to 25 year span of development. Mandatory diversion of solid waste by recycling construction debris, pursuant to the City of San Luis Obispo Construction and Demolition Debris Ordinance (No. 1381, Chapter 8.05), would reduce the amount disposed of in landfills by at least 50 percent to 888 tons. This amount of construction waste would send an average of 44.4 tons per year for disposal based on the City Development Plan lasting 20 years, or less than one ton per day. This amount of construction debris would not cause any of the County’s three landfills to exceed daily permitted disposal rates, and therefore, City Development Plan impacts on solid waste by construction activities would be less than significant. Operational Impacts Based on the reasonable maximum development scenario mix as listed in Table 2-9, the City Development Plan would generate approximately 8,661 tons of solid waste per year at build-out, as shown in Table 4.13-8. This amount would create an average of 33.3 tons of solid waste per day. By diverting at least 50 percent of the solid waste stream as required by AB 939, the amount of solid waste from this Project to be disposed of in a landfill would be reduced to 4,331 tons per year (16.65 tons per day). This amount is 1.39 percent of the daily permitted capacity at Cold Canyon Landfill, which would increase the amount disposed of to 402 tons per day, or approximately 34 percent of the permitted daily capacity. Table 4.13-8 City Development Plan - Solid Waste Generation Estimates Land Use sq. ft. tons/sq.ft./year tons/year tons/day a Office Park 348,000 0.0108 3,758 14.46 Manufacturing 170,000 0.0108 1,836 7.06 Lodging 70,000 0.0108 756 2.91 Industrial Park 50,000 0.0108 540 2.08 Warehousing/Indoor Storage 50,000 0.0108 540 2.08 Wholesale/Distribution 50,000 0.0108 540 2.08 Vehicle Service 20,000 0.0108 216 0.83 Retail 15,000 0.0024 36 0.14 Film Processing 10,000 0.0108 108 0.42 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-31 Table 4.13-8 City Development Plan - Solid Waste Generation Estimates Land Use sq. ft. tons/sq.ft./year tons/year tons/day a Printing 10,000 0.0108 108 0.42 Public Transit Maintenance 10,000 0.0108 108 0.42 Public Fire Station/Training Facility 5,000 0.0013 6.5 0.03 Specialized Education/Training 5,000 0.0013 6.5 0.03 Veterinary Clinic 5,000 0.0108 54 0.21 Baseball Fields - - 48 0.13 Total Waste Generated 8,661 33.3 Total Waste Disposed (following 50% reduction for recycling) 4,331 16.65 a. Tons per day estimate is based upon a five-day work week, except for the baseball fields, which is based upon a seven-day week. Sources: (1) California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, accessed from: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteChar/WasteGenRates/ on August 26, 2010; (2) BASF 2012 Although the Cold Canyon Landfill is nearing capacity, as stated above, an expansion plan for the facility was approved by the County in 2012, which would increase the total allowable tonnage limit by 430 tons per day, and extend the landfill operation date until the year 2040. Approval by CalRecycle is still needed for the expansion. In the event that the expansion does not occur, solid wastes from the City Development Plan would either be disposed of in one of the County’s two other landfills, or possibly transferred out of the County. Table 4.13-4 lists the capacities of the two other landfills in the County (Chicago Grade and Paso Robles) that could dispose of solid wastes that would be generated by the City Development Plan. Assuming that 100 percent of disposal from the City Development Plan was to be accommodated by either of these landfills, the increase in their percentage of permitted daily disposal quantities would be approximately 3 percent for the Chicago Grade facility and 3.5 percent for the Paso Robles facility. Based on the reported 2009 disposal rates, the increases would result in daily throughput percentages of 35 percent for the Chicago Grade Landfill and 23 percent for the Paso Robles Landfill. These facilities have estimated closure dates of 2042 and 2051, respectively. As such, landfills that serve the County have sufficient capacity to dispose of City Development Plan generated solid waste, which would make the solid waste impacts of this Project less than significant. Additionally, the City Development Plan would incorporate standard mitigation measures, such as providing space for recycling bins and compliance with recycling quotas, to further insure that solid waste impacts are kept to less than significant and that the diversion of recyclables is greater than 50 percent as required by AB 939. Mitigation Measure The following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce impacts generated by the Project. PS/U-8a Pursuant to the City of San Luis Obispo’s Ordinance 1381, Chapter 8.05, a Recycling Plan for the City Development Plan to be implemented during construction shall be submitted for approval by the City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department, prior to building permit issuance. Throughout construction periods, documentation shall be 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-32 provided to the City Utilities Department demonstrating compliance with the plan and the City’s Ordinance 1381. The plan shall include strategies to increase recycling of construction materials, and documentation that a minimum of 50 percent of discarded construction materials are diverted from landfills. The plan may consist of the following information: a. The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan. b. A brief description of the proposed Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project. c. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map. d. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site-separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility). e. The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled. f. A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan. g. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume). h. Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection reporting on a quarterly basis. i. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. j. Recycle information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. k. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. PS/U-8b Pursuant to the City of San Luis Obispo’s Source Reduction and Recycling Element to achieve a 50% reduction in solid waste as required by AB 939, the project shall provide a plan for the disposal, storage and collection of solid waste material for the project. The plan shall include provisions for adequate recycling bin capacity as well as timely collection of recyclables. The development of the plan shall be coordinated 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-33 with the City’s franchised solid waste collection and disposal firm, San Luis Obispo Garbage. Residual Impact The City Development Plan would result in a less than significant impact (Class III) on solid waste disposal. Implementation of mitigation measures PS/U-8a and PS/U-8b would further reduce this impact. 4.13.5.6 City Development Plan - Water Utility Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.9 Development of the Project could impact availability of water supplies from the City water utility. Development Class III Under the City Development Plan, water for the development would be provided by the City water utility. At full build-out the Project would have a water demand of about 117.4 acre-feet per year (afy). As part of the EIR process, the City Utilities Department prepared an SB 610 Water Supply Assessment for the proposed development. A copy of this assessment is provided in Appendix G.1. This document estimates that the total water demand within the City at build- out would be about 7,894 afy, which is well below the supply levels of 9,950 afy. In addition, the water use associated with the proposed development was included in the Urban Water Management Plan adopted by the City in 2011. Adequate water supply for the Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project was included in the City’s Urban Water Management Plan (adopted July 21, 2011). Based on the information provided in this Water Supply Assessment and the adopted Urban Water Management Plan, the City has a sufficient water supply available to meet the water supply demand (171.4 afy) of the Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project. Therefore the impact to the water supply would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended to further reduce impacts to water supply generated by the Project. PS/U-9 The Development shall connect to the City’s reclaimed water system and shall use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation. Residual Impact With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measure, City Development Plan impacts on water supply would be considered less than significant (Class III). 4.13.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures The County Development Plan component of the Project would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space, and 370,000 sq. ft. for service and light 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-34 manufacturing businesses. Table 2-14 shows the County Development Plan’s possible land use mix. The County Development Plan would also include the construction of an on-site wastewater treatment plant on one acre, and recreational sports fields on 15 acres. There are no residential uses proposed by the County Development Plan and no significant influx of residents would occur. 4.13.6.1 County Development Plan - Fire Protection Services Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.10 Build-out of the County Development Plan could increase demand for fire protection services. Development Class III The County Development Plan would create 803,000 sq. ft. of commercial facilities that include business park space, retail stores, and service or light manufacturing facilities on predominantly vacant property. By introducing capital facilities where none exist, along with employees that would staff those facilities, the County Plan would potentially increase the demand for fire protection services to protect lives and property. This increase in demand for fire protection services would be due to structure fires, hazardous material spills associated with some of the possible commercial services land use that would be allowed by the County zoning, paramedic response, wildfire, etc. The Project Site is in a Moderate Fire Severity Zone, which means there is not a substantial wildfire hazard. The site is currently surrounded primarily by agricultural land, but the area is seeing increased levels of commercial and residential development. The Project Site also contains large wetland areas. All of these factors would reduce wildfire hazards for the Project Site. Development at the Project Site would have to meet all of the requirements of the County of San Luis Obispo Fire Standards and applicable provisions of the California Fire Code. This would include items such as installation of fire water supplies and hydrants throughout the development, building sprinklers, adequate fire department access, proper placement of street numbers, water supply capable of providing adequate fire flow, installation of fire protection systems and equipment in buildings, portable fire extinguishers, etc. The Project, under the County Plan, would not require new or physically altered facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives, due to the close proximity of CALFIRE Station #21 which is located 2 miles from the Project Site. In addition, the County has a fire services mitigation fee in place that is applied to developments to offset impacts to fire protection services. Therefore the impacts to fire protection services would be considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impact The County Development Plan would result in impacts on fire protection services that would be considered less than significant (Class III). 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-35 4.13.6.2 County Development Plan - Police Protection Services Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.11 Build-out of the County Development Plan would create an incrementally higher demand for police protection services. Development Class III The development of the County Development Plan would create 803,000 sq. ft. of commercial facilities that include business park space, retail stores, and service or light manufacturing facilities on predominantly vacant property. By introducing capital facilities where none exist, along with employees that would staff those facilities, the Project would potentially increase the demand for police services to protect lives and property. However, the Project Site is a very small area when compared to the overall area patrolled by the Coast Station of the San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Office, which spans from Avila Beach to San Simeon and from the Los Padres mountains to the eastern county line (SLO Sheriff 2013). As such, development of the Project would require no new or physically altered facilities to accommodate additional officers that may be needed in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives. Therefore, impacts to police protection would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impact As service demands associated with development in the Project area increase, additional staffing resources may be needed to insure that the community continues to receive an adequate level of police protection. However, since no new police facilities would be required to serve the Project, the County Development Plan would result in impacts on police protection services that would be considered less than significant (Class III). 4.13.6.3 County Development Plan - Public Schools The County Development Plan would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of Business Park and limited retail space, and 370,000 sq. ft. for service and light manufacturing businesses. There are no residential uses proposed by the County Plan and no significant influx of school age children would occur. As no portion of the County Plan would increase the population of school children residing at the Project Site, the County plan would not have an impact on schools that would require new or physically altered facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on schools. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-36 4.13.6.4 County Development Plan - Energy Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.12 Construction and operation of the County Development Plan could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Development Class III The County Development Plan would create commercial facilities that include 433,000 sq. ft. of business park space and limited retail facilities, and 370,000 sq. ft. for service and light manufacturing businesses, as well as a waste water treatment facility (WWTF). Energy usage estimates will vary based on the types of businesses that could occupy the commercial space that the Project will provide; however, energy use under the County Development Plan will be higher than energy use under the City Development Plan due to the on-site WWTF. Table 4.13-9 estimates County Plan electricity usage based on the land use mix shown in Table 2-14, and reports that the County Plan’s electricity demand at build-out would be approximately a 0.065 percent increase over 2009 usage in the PG& E planning area. Electrical service in the Project area is considered reliable by PG&E, which serves the Project area and owns a substation approximately 2.8 miles to the northwest that could supply electricity for the County Development Plan. Table 4.13-9 Estimated Project Electricity Usage – County Development Plan Land Use sq. ft. Annual Electricity Use kWh/sq.ft.) Annual Project Electricity Usage (MkWh) a Office Park 348,000 17.7 6.16 Manufacturing 170,000 20.02 3.40 Lodging (115 rooms) 70,000 12.13 0.85 Industrial Park 50,000 20.02 1.00 Warehousing/Indoor Storage 50,000 20.02 1.00 Wholesale/Distribution 50,000 20.02 1.00 Vehicle Service 20,000 20.02 0.40 Retail 15,000 14.06 0.21 Film Processing 10,000 17.7 0.18 Printing 10,000 17.7 0.18 Specialized Education/Training 5,000 7.46 0.04 Veterinary Clinic 5,000 19.61 0.10 Baseball Fields - - 0.15 WWTF 0.83 Project Electricity Usage 15.5 a. MkWh – Million kilowatt hours Sources: (1) California Energy Commission. 2006. Report No. CEC-400-2006-005; (2) FCPA 2005; (3) USEPA 2008. Natural gas service in the area is provided by SCG, which indicates that its services in the Project area are considered reliable. Table 4.13-10 estimates the County Development Plan’s natural gas 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-37 usage based on the land use mix shown in Table 2-14, and reports that the County Plan’s natural gas demand at build-out would be approximately a 0.002 percent increase over 2009 usage in the SCG planning area. Table 4.13-10 Estimated Natural Gas Usage – County Development Plan Land Use sq. ft. Annual natural Gas Use therms/sq. ft.) Project natural Gas Usage therms) Office Park 348,000 0.22 76,560 Manufacturing 170,000 0.06 10,200 Lodging 70,000 0.42 29,400 Industrial Park 50,000 0.06 3,000 Warehousing/Indoor Storage 50,000 0.06 3,000 Wholesale/Distribution 50,000 0.06 3,000 Vehicle Service 20,000 0.06 1,200 Retail 15,000 0.05 750 Film Processing 10,000 0.22 2,200 Printing 10,000 0.22 2,200 Specialized Education/Training 5,000 0.16 800 Veterinary Clinic 5,000 0.76 3,800 Baseball Fields 500 0.05 25 WWTF 4,410 Total Project Annual Natural Gas Usage 136,110 Source: California Energy Commission. 2006. Report No. CEC-400-2006-005 Although natural gas is not currently provided on the Project Site, SCG owns a gas line along Tank Farm Road that ends approximately 400 feet from the west boundary of the Site, which could be accessed to supply natural gas service to the Project area. Both utilities report reliable service levels in the Project area, therefore, it is not expected that the development of the County Development Plan’s commercial facilities would consume energy beyond the capacity of PG&E or SCG to supply or produce. The County’s Energy Policy in Chapter 5 of the County General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element encourages energy saving designs for new development. By incorporating energy saving design features, the County Plan would not be in conflict with energy conservation plans see Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis), or result in the construction or operations of a project that would use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. Therefore, the Project impacts on energy would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce impacts generated by the Project. PS/U-12a If additional electrical or natural gas energy infrastructure is required to accommodate the proposed Project, the Applicant would be required to pay a fee to PG&E or SCG respectively, to provide additional service. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-38 PS/U-12b To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. PS/U-12c The Applicant shall comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with all adopted policies of the County General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element regarding energy consumption such as: a. Incorporating cost-effective, renewable, energy resources into the Project; b. Providing passive features through site design that allows shade to reduce unwanted heat gain, thereby reducing the need to use energy for cooling; and, c. Installation of energy efficient appliances, heat recovery equipment, and building energy management systems. Residual Impact The County Development Plan would result in a less than significant (Class III) impact on energy supplies. Implementation of mitigation measures PS/U-12a-c would further reduce this impact. 4.13.6.5 County Development Plan - Solid Waste Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact PS/U.13 Construction and operation of the County Development Plan could generate significant amounts of solid waste. Development Class III Construction Period Impacts The County Development Plan would create 803,000 sq. ft. of commercial facilities, which would generate construction debris at an estimated rate of 4.34 lbs. per square foot (USEPA 2009). Solid waste produced by this Project during construction would then be approximately 1,743 tons (803,000 sq. ft. x 4.34 lbs./sq. ft. x .0005 tons/lb.) over the 20 to 25 year span of development. Mandatory diversion of solid waste by recycling construction debris, pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11, Section 4.408, would reduce the amount disposed of in landfills by at least 50 percent to 871 tons. This amount of construction waste would send an average of 43.6 tons per year for disposal based on the Project development lasting 20 years or less than one ton per day. This amount of construction debris would not cause any of the County’s three landfills to exceed daily permitted disposal rates, and therefore, the County Development Plan’s impacts on solid waste facilities during construction activities would be less than significant. Operational Impacts Based on the reasonable maximum development scenario mix as listed in Table 2-14, the County Plan would generate approximately 8,618.5 tons of solid waste per year at build-out, as shown in Table 4.13-11. This amount would create an average of 33 tons of solid waste per day. This 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-39 amount includes waste activated sludge generated from the WWTF’s treatment process Appendix A, page 21). Table 4.13-11 County Development Plan - Solid Waste Generation Estimates Land Use sq. ft. tons/sq.ft./year tons/year tons/day a Office Park 348,000 0.0108 3,758 14.5 Manufacturing 170,000 0.0108 1,836 7.1 Lodging 70,000 0.0108 756 2.9 Industrial Park 50,000 0.0108 540 2.1 Warehousing/Indoor Storage 50,000 0.0108 540 2.1 Wholesale/Distribution 50,000 0.0108 540 2.1 Vehicle Service 20,000 0.0108 216 0.8 Retail 15,000 0.0024 36 0.1 Film Processing 10,000 0.0108 108 0.4 Printing 10,000 0.0108 108 0.4 Specialized Education/Training 5,000 0.0013 6.5 0.0 Veterinary Clinic 5,000 0.0108 54 0.2 Baseball Fields - - 48 0.13 WWTF - - 72 0.2 Total Waste Generated 8,618.5 33 Total Waste Disposed (following 50% reduction for recycling) 4,309.3 16.5 a. Tons per day estimate is based upon a five-day work week, except for the baseball fields and the WWTF, which are based upon a seven-day work week. Sources: (1) California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, accessed from: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteChar/WasteGenRates/ on August 26, 2010; (2) BASF 2012; (3) Appendix A By diverting at least 50 percent of the solid waste stream as required by AB 939, the amount of solid waste from the County Plan to be disposed of in a landfill would be reduced to 4,309.3 tons per year (16.5 tons per day). This amount is 1.38 percent of the daily permitted capacity at Cold Canyon Landfill and would increase the total amount disposed of to 470 tons per day, or approximately 39 percent of the permitted daily capacity. Although the Cold Canyon Landfill is nearing capacity, as stated above, an expansion plan for the facility was approved by the County in 2012, which would increase the total allowable tonnage limit by 430 tons per day and extend the landfill operation date until the year 2040. Approval by CalRecycle is still needed for the expansion. In the event that the expansion does not occur, solid wastes from the County Development Plan would either be disposed of in one of the County’s two other landfills, or possibly transferred out of the County. In addition, Table 4.13-4 lists the capacities of the two other landfills in the County (Chicago Grade and Paso Robles) that could dispose of solid wastes that would be generated by the County Development Plan. Assuming that 100 percent of disposal from the County Development Plan was to be accommodated by either of these landfills, the increase in their percentage of permitted daily disposal quantities would be approximately three percent for the Chicago Grade facility and 3.6 percent for the Paso Robles facility. Based on the reported 2009 disposal rates, the increases related to the Project would result in daily total throughput percentages of 35 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-40 percent for the Chicago Grade Landfill and 23 percent for the Paso Robles Landfill, well below their permitted capacities. These facilities have estimated closure dates of 2042 and 2051, respectively. As such, landfills that serve the County have sufficient capacity to dispose of County Development Plan generated solid waste, which would make the solid waste impacts less than significant. Additionally, the County Development Plan would incorporate standard mitigation measures in accordance with County Ordinance 2008-3 Section 4, which mandates recycling criteria for commercial facilities, to ensure compliance with the 50 percent diversion of solid wastes required by AB939. This Ordinance provides a list of commercial facility requirements including: Provision of on-site recycling including adequate space for recyclable material collection bins; Mandatory participation of occupants; and Education materials for all new occupants regarding their responsibility to participate, as well as the types of materials accepted for the recycling program Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended to further reduce impacts to solid waste disposal generated by the Project. PS/U-13a To maintain a diversion rate of at least 50 percent of construction waste from reaching the landfill, a Recycling Plan for the proposed Project is to be implemented during construction. The plan shall be submitted to the County Public Works Department for approval prior to permit issuance, as well as ongoing documentation from the Applicant that demonstrates compliance with the plan. Information to be included in this plan may consist of the following: a. The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan. b. A brief description of the proposed Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project. c. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map. d. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site-separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility). e. The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-41 f. A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan. g. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume). h. Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection shall report on a quarterly basis. i. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. j. Recycling information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. k. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. PS/U-13b To achieve the minimum 50 percent reduction in solid waste disposal during the ongoing operations of the County Development Plan as required by AB 939, the Project shall provide a plan for the disposal, storage, and collection of solid waste material for the Project. This plan shall include the provision of adequate space for recyclable collection bins as well as the timely collection of recyclable material. The development of the plan shall be coordinated with the County’s franchised solid waste collection and disposal firm, San Luis Obispo Garbage. Residual Impact The County Development Plan would result in a less than significant impact (Class III) on solid waste disposal. Implementation of mitigation measures PS/U-13a and PS/U-13b would further reduce this impact. 4.13.7 Cumulative Analysis As stated in Chapter 3.0, Cumulative Scenario and Methodology, under the CEQA Guidelines, a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental impact report (“EIR”) together with other projects causing related impacts.” Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in section 15065(c). An EIR need not discuss impacts that do not result in part from the project evaluated in that EIR. The Cumulative discussion does not need to provide as much detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone. The discussion of cumulative impacts shall be guided by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and shall focus on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute rather than the attributes of other projects which do not contribute to the cumulative impact.”(CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)). 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-42 4.13.7.1 Cumulative Analysis of Remediation Project Impacts The localized nature of the remediation Project’s public service impacts as well as implementation of the identified mitigation measures would make impacts related to these activities less than significant. Fire Protection Impacts Based on the temporary nature of remediation activities, and the localized area of potential impact identified as impact PS/U.1 regarding fire protection emergency vehicles response times along Tank Farm Road, the remediation component of the Project would not contribute to a significant impact in combination with related projects identified in Table 3-1. Therefore, this Project would not contribute to cumulative fire protection impacts and would be considered less than significant. Police Protection Impacts Based on the temporary nature of remediation activities, and the localized area of potential impact identified as impact PS/U.2 regarding police emergency vehicles response times along Tank Farm Road, the remediation component of the Project would not contribute to a significant impact in combination with related projects identified in Table 3-1. Therefore, the proposed remediation would not contribute to cumulative police protection impacts and would be considered less than significant. School Impacts The remediation component of the Project would not include residential development, and as such, would not generate an influx of new students in area schools. Therefore, remediation contributions to cumulative school impacts in combination with related projects would be less than significant. Energy Impacts As stated above under subsection 4.13.4.4, Energy Impacts and Mitigation Measures, remediation project impacts would be less than significant as equipment used for these purposes are typically self-propelled and do not require connection to energy utilities. Therefore, remediation would not contribute to cumulative energy impacts and would be considered less than significant. Solid Waste Impacts The majority of solid waste disposal generated by the remediation component of the Project would consist of NHIS soil, which would be disposed of at the Santa Maria landfill as stated in subsection 4.13.4.5, Solid Waste Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Developments listed on Table 3-1 as related projects would not be expected to dispose of municipal solid waste (MSW) at this landfill as it is located in Santa Barbara County. As such, disposal of the NHIS material from remediation would not have a cumulative contribution to impacts in conjunction with the listed related projects. However, an assessment of capacity at the Santa Maria Landfill shows that remediation’s expected quantity of NHIS soil disposal would be 5.6 percent of the landfills annual throughput (2009). A combined total disposal of the remediation portion of the Project- generated waste and the annual disposal at this site would be less than 37 percent of the permitted capacity and as such, the Project would be considered to have an adverse, but not significant contribution to cumulative impacts. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-43 Demolition of existing buildings would generate approximately 224.5 tons of waste (following diversion of recyclable materials) for disposal in County landfills. Assuming that all demolition activities would be completed in the first year, the amount of demolition waste disposed of would be 0.05 percent of the permitted throughput at Cold Canyon Landfill. Implementation of mitigation measure PS/U-4, providing a SWMP, would reduce solid waste disposal to the least amount feasible. Due to the temporary nature of the remediation activities, and considering that with the addition of Project-related demolition debris the Cold Canyon Landfill would be operating at less than 33 percent of permitted capacity, the Project’s contribution to cumulative solid waste disposal impacts would be less than significant. 4.13.7.2 Cumulative Analysis of City Development Plan Impacts The list of Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies City and County Development Plans that, depending on location and timing could, in combination with the proposed City Development Plan, result in cumulative impacts. However, the City Development Plan’s contribution to cumulative impacts regarding public services would be less than significant as shown below. Fire Protection Impacts SLOFD Master Plan has identified a deficiency in City fire protection services related to response times and service ratios that is currently being alleviated by a mutual aid agreement with CALFIRE. Under this agreement County fire fighting units also respond to City emergencies. A number of the cumulative projects would be in the vicinity of the project area, which would place additional demands on the mutual aid agreement between SLOFD and CALFIRE. The SLOFD Master Plan identified a long-term solution for these deficiencies that would involve the construction of a new fire station in the area of the Project Site. One of the possible land uses for this Project, listed in Table 2-11, is a 5,000 sq. ft. public fire station and training facility. Should this facility be developed, the Project’s contribution to fire protection impacts would be considered beneficial. However, it cannot be stated with certainty when, or if, such a facility would be provided and staffed by SLOFD. Until such time, SLOCF would have to rely on the existing mutual aid agreement with CALFIRE to assure adequate response times and service ratios. With the mutual aid agreement with CALFIRE, the cumulative impacts to fire protection services would be less than significant. Police Protection Impacts The Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies developments that would create 785 residences and over 633,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, which would be in addition to the City Development Plan. While the SLOFD reports that current staffing is adequate for the community’s needs, this level of cumulative development would be expected to increase demands for police services. However, as most uniformed law enforcement personnel patrol with mobile units, should cumulative development in the City require additional officers, it would not be expected to result in the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, a CEQA threshold for public services. Therefore, cumulative impacts regarding police protection would be less than significant. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-44 School Impacts The City Development Plan would not include residential development, and as such, would not generate an influx of new students in area schools. Therefore, the City Development Plan contributions to cumulative school impacts in combination with related projects would be less than significant. Energy Impacts The Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies developments that would create 785 residences and over 633,000 sq. ft. of commercial space within the City, and an additional 86,183 sq. ft. of commercial space in the unincorporated County areas. This level of commercial development would be approximately 90 percent of the square footage proposed by the City Development Plan, and as such, can be assumed to consume about 90 percent as much electricity and natural gas as calculated for the City Development Plan in tables 4.13-5 and 4.13-6. Cumulative development scenario residential development of 785 dwelling units would generate an additional population of 1,876 residents based on 2.39 persons per household (U.S. Census 2010). Annual energy demand associated with residences in California is reported to be 2,379 kWh per capita for electricity, and 13.7 million Btu/capita for natural gas (U.S. Department of Energy 2008). Applying these rates to the estimated 1,876 new residents generated by related projects results in an annual demand approximation for electricity and natural gas of 4.46 MkWh and 257,012 therms, respectively. Therefore, cumulative annual energy demand from all cumulative development projects and the City Development Plan would be approximately 32.52 MkWh for electricity and 518,281 therms from natural gas. This cumulative energy demand would represent increases of 0.03 percent for the PG&E planning area and 0.007 percent for the SCG planning area. As such, cumulative impacts would be considered less than significant. Solid Waste Impacts The Cumulative Projects, as shown in Table 3-1, would include development of commercial space that would total approximately 90 percent of the proposed City Development Plan’s square footage, as well as about 785 residences. Cumulative solid waste generation can be estimated by assuming cumulative development projects would generate commercial waste at a similar rate to the City Development Plan, and calculating residential disposal based on 2.39 persons per residence (U.S. Census 2010) and a disposal rate of 0.32 tons per resident per year (Integrated Waste Management Board 2009). These calculations result in an estimated cumulative disposal rate of 16.633.12 tons per day of solid waste, which would be 0.771.5 percent of the permitted daily throughput at the County’s three municipal waste landfills. As this quantity would not cause the landfills to exceed their permitted throughput, cumulative solid waste impacts would be less than significant. Water Use Impacts The Related Projects, as shown in Table 3-1, would include development of commercial space that would total approximately 90 percent of the proposed Project’s square footage, as well as about 785 residences, the majority of which would be within the City limits. All of these cumulative developments within the City limits have been included in the City of San Luis Obispo 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, which shows there are adequate water supplies to support the cumulative development. Therefore, cumulative water use impacts would be less than significant. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-45 4.13.7.3 Cumulative Analysis of County Development Plan Impacts The Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies City and County Development Plans that depending on location and timing could, in combination with the County Development Plan, result in cumulative impacts. However, the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts regarding public services would be less than significant as shown below. Fire Protection Impacts As service demands associated with cumulative development in the Project area increase, additional staffing resources will need to be put in place to insure that all areas of the community receives an adequate level of service. However, due to the close proximity of CALFIRE Station 21 which is located 2 miles from the Project Site, under the County Development Plan the Project would not contribute to a need for new or physically altered fire station facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives. In addition, there is a mutual aid agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and CALFIRE. By adhering to a reciprocal agreement that advises both CALFIRE and SLOFD to each send one fire engine during a fire emergency, adequate fire fighting resources would be provided under the cumulative development scenario. Therefore, cumulative impacts to fire protection services would be less than significant. Police Protection Impacts The Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies developments that would create 785 residences and over 633,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, which would be in addition to the County Development Plan. This level of cumulative development would be expected to increase demands for police services. However, as most uniformed law enforcement personnel patrol with mobile units, should cumulative development in the County require additional officers, it would not be expected to result in the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, a CEQA threshold for public services. Therefore, cumulative impacts regarding police protection would be less than significant. School Impacts The County Development Plan would not include residential development, and as such, would not generate an influx of new students in area schools. Therefore, the County Development Plan contributions to cumulative school impacts in combination with related projects would be less than significant. Energy Impacts The Cumulative Projects list shown in Table 3-1 identifies developments that would create 785 residences and over 633,000 sq. ft. of commercial space within the City, and an additional 86,183 sq. ft. of commercial space in the unincorporated County areas. This level of commercial development would be approximately 90 percent of the proposed square footage proposed by the County Development Plan, and as such, can be assumed to consume about 90 percent as much electricity and natural gas as calculated for the County Plan in tables 4.13-8 and 4.13-9. Cumulative development scenario residential development of 785 dwelling units would generate an additional population of 1,876 residents based on 2.39 persons per household (U.S. Census 2010). Annual energy demand associated with residences in California is reported to be 2,379 kWh per capita for electricity, and 13.7 million Btu/capita for natural gas (U.S. Department of 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-46 Energy 2008). Applying these rates to the estimated 1,876 new residents generated by related projects results in an annual demand approximation for electricity and natural gas of 4.46 MkWh and 257,012 therms, respectively. Therefore, cumulative annual energy demand from all cumulative development projects and the City Development Plan would be approximately 32.29 MkWh for electricity and 516,881 therms from natural gas. This cumulative energy demand would represent increases of 0.03 percent for the PG&E planning area and 0.007 percent for the SCG planning area. As such, cumulative impacts would be considered less than significant. Solid Waste Impacts The Cumulative Projects, as shown in Table 3-1, would include development of commercial space that would total approximately 90 percent of the County Plan’s square footage, as well as about 785 residences. Cumulative solid waste generation can be estimated by assuming cumulative development projects would generate commercial waste at a similar rate to the County Plan, and calculating residential disposal based on 2.39 persons per residence (U.S. Census 2010) and a disposal rate of 0.32 tons per resident per year (Integrated Waste Management Board 2009). These calculations result in an estimated cumulative disposal rate of 32.61 tons per day of solid waste, which would be 1.5 percent of the permitted daily throughput at the County’s three municipal waste landfills. As this quantity would not cause the landfills to exceed their permitted throughput, cumulative solid waste impacts would be less than significant. 4.13.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.13.8.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party PS/U-1 The Applicant shall incorporate the following in the construction traffic management plan for review and approval by the City and County Public Works departments: Advance notification of emergency response providers near the Project Site of exact construction locations, potential lane closure schedules, and potential alternate routes. In order to avoid disruption to fire protection services’ access through the area, traffic safety procedures, including, but not limited to, flagmen and signs controlling traffic crossing Tank Farm Road. Plan Review Prior to Grading Permit County Planning and Building City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department, Building & Safety Division PS/U-3 To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. Field Verification During Remediation County Planning and Building PS/U-4 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall submit a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) for approval by the San Luis Obispo County IWMA (and the Plan Review Prior to Grading Permit County Planning and Building 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-47 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department if the City annexes the site prior to completion of the remediation component of the project) to maintain a diversion rate of at least 50 percent of construction waste from reaching the landfill. The County/City Monitor, IWMA (and the City Utilities Department if applicable) would also monitor the Applicant’s implementation of the SWMP and verify compliance with solid waste diversion requirements. The SWMP shall consist of information regarding, but not limited to: The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan; A brief description of the Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project; Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map; A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site- separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility); The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled; A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan; A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume); Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection shall report on a quarterly basis; Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices; Recycling information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices; and Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be Field Verification During Remediation City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department, Building & Safety Division 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-48 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. 4.13.8.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party PS/U-5a The Applicant shall deed to the City property at the Project Site that the City could use for the development of a public fire station. Signed deed between Applicant and City Prior to occupation of Phase I City of San Luis Obispo PS/U-5b Development shall only be approved when the City deems that adequate fire suppression services and facilities, consistent with adopted travel time standards, are available, or will be made available concurrent with development at the Project Site. If, at time of development it is determined that the development site is outside of adequate response time zones, feasible options to enhance emergency access to the development sites may include but are not limited to the following: Completion of transportation improvements that improve emergency services travel time to proposed development sites. Co-location of City fire services with existing Cal Fire facilities located on Broad Street Establishment of fire facilities within a closer proximity to the development site that meet or exceed adopted travel time standards. Developer/Applicant financing of other improvements that will contribute to alleviating current deficiencies as identified in the SLOFD Master Plan. Review of fire services response times to development site. Prior to issuance of building permits for each Phase of development SLOFD City of San Luis Obispo Community Development PS/U-7a If additional electrical or natural gas energy infrastructure is required to accommodate the proposed Project, the Applicant would be required to pay a fee to PG&E or SCG respectively, to provide additional service. Pay a fee to the utility provider(s) to install additional infrastructure if necessary. Plan check prior to Grading Permit PG&E or SCG respectively for electricity or natural gas facilities. PS/U-7b To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. Field Verification During Remediation City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department, Building & 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-49 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party Safety Division PS/U-7c The Applicant shall comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with all adopted City policies regarding energy consumption such as: Incorporating cost-effective, renewable, energy resources into the Project; Providing passive features through site design that allows shade to reduce unwanted heat gain, thereby reducing the need to use energy for cooling; and Installation of energy efficient appliances, heat recovery equipment, and building energy management systems. Review of Plans Site Inspection Prior to permit issuance City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department, Building & Safety Division PS/U-8a Pursuant to the City of San Luis Obispo’s Ordinance 1381, Chapter 8.05, a Recycling Plan for the City Development Plan to be implemented during construction shall be submitted for approval by the City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department, prior to building permit issuance. Throughout construction periods, documentation shall be provided to the City Utilities Department demonstrating compliance with the plan and the City’s Ordinance 1381. The plan shall include strategies to increase recycling of construction materials, and documentation that a minimum of 50 percent of discarded construction materials are diverted from landfills. The plan may consist of the following information: The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan. A brief description of the proposed Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site-separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility). The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled. A description of meetings to be held between Provide recycling information as required to complete the City Utilities Department form for Construction Demolition Recycling Plan and Disposal Report Prior to permit issuance and throughout construction activity periods. City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-50 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume). Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection reporting on a quarterly basis. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. Recycle information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. PS/U-8b Pursuant to the City of San Luis Obispo’s Source Reduction and Recycling Element to achieve a 50% reduction in solid waste as required by AB 939, the project shall provide a plan for the disposal, storage and collection of solid waste material for the project. The plan shall include provisions for adequate recycling bin capacity as well as timely collection of recyclables. The development of the plan shall be coordinated with the City’s franchised solid waste collection and disposal firm, San Luis Obispo Garbage. Review of Construction Management Plan Site Inspection Prior to permit issuance and ongoing City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department PS/U-9 The Development shall connect to the City’s reclaimed water system and shall use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation. Review of Drawings Site Inspection Prior to permit issuance Prior to Occupancy City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-51 4.13.8.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party PS/U-12a If additional electrical or natural gas energy infrastructure is required to accommodate the proposed Project, the Applicant would be required to pay a fee to PG&E or SCG respectively, to provide additional service. Pay a fee to the utility provider(s) to install additional infrastructure if necessary. Plan check prior to Grading Permit PG&E or SCG respectively for electricity or natural gas facilities. PS/U-12b To avoid wasteful use of gasoline or diesel fuel, construction vehicles should be left on-site for the duration of each annual active construction season (as defined by allowed construction timing by the various mitigation measures), and construction vehicles shall be turned off when not in use to avoid idling. Field Verification During Remediation County Planning and Building PS/U-12c The Applicant shall comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with all adopted policies of the County General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element regarding energy consumption such as: Incorporating cost-effective, renewable, energy resources into the Project; Providing passive features through site design that allows shade to reduce unwanted heat gain, thereby reducing the need to use energy for cooling; and, Installation of energy efficient appliances, heat recovery equipment, and building energy management systems. Review of Drawings Site Inspection Prior to permit issuance County Planning and Building PS/U-13a To maintain a diversion rate of at least 50 percent of construction waste from reaching the landfill, a Recycling Plan for the proposed Project is to be implemented during construction. The plan shall be submitted to the County Public Works Department for approval prior to permit issuance, as well as ongoing documentation from the Applicant that demonstrates compliance with the plan. Information to be included in this plan may consist of the following: The name and contact information of who will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan. A brief description of the proposed Project wastes to be generated, including types and estimated quantities of each material to be salvaged, reused, or recycled during the construction phase of this Project. Waste sorting/recycling and/or collection areas shall be clearly indicated on the Site Map. A description of the means of transportation and destination of recyclable materials and waste, and a Review of Construction Management Plan Site Inspection Plan check prior to Grading Permit SLO County Planning and Building Department 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-52 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party description of where recyclable materials and waste will be sorted (whether materials will be site- separated and hauled to designated recycling or landfill facilities, or whether mixed materials will be removed from the site to be processed at a mixed waste sorting facility). The name of the landfill(s) where trash will be disposed of and a projected amount of material that will be landfilled. A description of meetings to be held between Applicant and contractor to ensure compliance with the recycling plan. A contingency plan shall identify an alternate location to recycle and/or stockpile construction debris in the event of local recycling facilities becoming unable to accept material (for example: all local recycling facilities reaching the maximum tons per day due to a time period of unusually large volume). Ongoing documentation by the Contractor submitted with each Building/Zoning Inspection shall report on a quarterly basis. Disposal information including quantity of material landfilled, which landfill was used, total landfill tipping fees paid, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. Recycling information including quantity of material recycles, receiving party, and copies of weight tickets, manifests, receipts, and invoices. Reuse and salvage information including quantities of salvage materials, storage locations if they are to be used on-site, or receiving party if resold/used off-site. PS/U-13b To achieve the minimum 50 percent reduction in solid waste disposal during the ongoing operations of the Project as required by AB 939, the Project shall provide a plan for the disposal, storage, and collection of solid waste material for the Project. This plan shall include the provision of adequate space for recyclable collection bins as well as the timely collection of recyclable material. The development of the plan shall be coordinated with the County’s franchised solid waste collection and disposal firm, San Luis Obispo Garbage. Review of Construction Management Plan Site Inspection Plan check prior to Grading Permit SLO County Planning and Building Department 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-53 4.13.9 References Atkinson, Mark. 2010. [telephone communication]. To Envicom Corporation. Clean Harbors hazardous waste facility capacity in Buttonwillow, CA. BASF Corporation (BASF). 2012. Zero Waste Programs in NA. Accessed from http://www.a2gov.org/government/publicservices/fieldoperations/solidwasteunit/Documents/ BASF_Zero%20Waste%202012-3-2.pdf on May 1, 2013. Bledsoe, John. [e-mail communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. Adequacy of San Luis Obispo Police Department staffing and mutual assistance with Sheriff’s Dept. Bledsoe, John. [telephone communication]. 2011. To Envicom Corporation. Update adequacy of San Luis Obispo Police Department staffing and mutual assistance with Sheriff’s Dept. Brady, Chris. 2010. [telephone communication]. To Envicom Corporation. Kettleman Hills Hazardous Waste Facility capacity. CALFIRE. 2009 [updated]. San Luis Obispo County Fire Department firefighter staffing and response time. Accessed from http://www.calfireslo.org on July 8, 2011. CalRecycle. 2011. Facility List. Accessed from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/FacIT/Facility/List.aspx?CountyIDList=40&ActivityCategoryI DList=7%2c1%2c4%2c2%2c3%2c6%2c5&Mode=View CalRecycle 2013. Senate Bill 1374. Accessed from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/Library/canddmodel/instruction/SB1374.htm. California Energy Commission (CEC). 2011 [updated]. Total Electricity System Power. Accessed from http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/total_system_power.html. on July 9, 2011. Electricity generation fuel types. 2009. California Energy Demand 2010-2020, Adopted Forecast. Energy demand growth forecasts. City of San Luis Obispo (City). 2005. Airport Area Specific Plan. Police Department objectives. 2009. Fire Department Master Plan. Vol. 1. January 16, 2009. 2010. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department. 2010. 2011. Planning Services Fee Schedule. Accessed from http://www.slocity.org/communitydevelopment/fees.asp on July 14, 2011. City development fees. 2011. SB 610 Water Supply Assessment. City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department. 2011. City of Santa Maria. [Internet] 2007. City of Santa Maria Utilities Department, Non-Hazardous Hydrocarbon Impacted Soils (NHIS) Program. Accessed from http://cityofsantamarianhis.info/ on July 8, 2011. NHIS disposal facility. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities Chevron Tank Farm December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-54 Cold Canyon Landfill FEIR (Cold Canyon FEIR). 2012. Final Environmental Impact Report for Cold Canyon Landfill Expansion. Project Description. County of San Luis Obispo (County). 2013. Inland Area Plan. Sheriff’s department response times. Cron, Peter. 2009. [telephone communication]. To Envicom Corporation. Solid waste diversion rates. Day, Chris. [telephone communication]. 2011. To Envicom Corporation. California Highway Patrol. Number of CHP officers at San Luis Obispo Station. Fairfax County Park Authority (FCPA). 2005. Athletic Field Lighting Technical Study. Accessed from http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/gmp/athletic_lighting_rpt.pdf on May 1, 2013. Friedlander, Randy (CalRecycle). [telephone communication]. 2011. To Envicom Corporation. Cold Canyon Landfill expansion plan status. Google. [Internet mapping]. 2009. Distances of fire stations from Project area. Holmes, Kim. [telephone communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. SLCUSD schools serving Project area. Integrated Waste Management Board. 2009. California 2008 Statewide Waste Characterization Study. Pg. 17. Kettleman Hills. 2012. State of California CIWMB. Registration Permit, 16-AA-0023. Issued December 4, 2012. Maggio, Rodger. [e-mail communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. City fire staffing, response times, and fire safety development requirements for the Project Site. e-mail communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. Lack of development fees for City Fire Services. Queen, Matthew. [telephone communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. Reliability of area electrical service. Razzoli, Bruce. [telephone communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. Expansion of Cold Canyon Landfill. Reid, Rob. [e-mail communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Department patrol substations. 2011. Letter to Envicom Corporation. San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Department staffing levels and response times. Santa Barbara County (SB County). 2013. Multi-Jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Group. Accessed from http://www.countyofsb.org/pwd/mjswtg/default.htm on April 25, 2013. SCG. [Internet]. 2010. Southern California Gas Company Annual Report of System Reliability Issues November 4, 2010. Accessed from http://www.socalgas.com/for-your- business/natural-gas-services/reliability.shtml on July 25, 2011. SLCUSD. [Internet]. updated 2011. San Luis Coastal Unified School District. Accessed from http://www.slcusd.org/ on July 12, 2011. About SLCUSD. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.13-55 San Luis Obispo County (SLO County). 2012. Planning Commission Staff Report on Cold Canyon Landfill FEIR & CUP. dated June 14, 2012. City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department (SLOFD). [Internet]. 2011. City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department. Accessed from http://www.ci.san-luis-obispo.ca.us/fire/about.asp on July 8, 2011. City Fire Department staffing. City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department (SLOFD). [Internet]. 2011. City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department staffing. Accessed from http://www.ci.san-luis-obispo.ca.us/fire/about.asp on July 8, 2011. San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Office (SLO Sheriff). 2013. Division and Units. Field Operations. Accessed from http://slosheriff.org/_Divisions/FieldOperations.aspx on April 25, 2013. Torres, Gil. [e-mail communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. California Highway Patrol. U.S. Census. 2010. San Luis Obispo County QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau. Accessed from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/06079.html on July 8, 2011. U.S. Department of Energy 2008. [Internet]. Energy Consumption in California Homes. USEPA. 2008. Municipal Nutrient Removal Technologies Reference Document. Volume 2 – Appendices. EPA 832-R-08-006. September 2008. 2009. Estimating 2003 Building-Related Construction and Demolition Materials Amounts. Report # EPA530-R-09-002; March 2009. Zrelak, Chad T. [letter]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. CALFIRE Responsibility, Staffing, and fire safety development requirements for the Project area. Zrelak, Chad T. [telephone communication]. 2009. To Envicom Corporation. CALFIRE protection and mutual assistance agreements in the Project area. Zrelak, Chad T. [telephone communication]. 2011. To Envicom Corporation. Update previous information on staffing and response times. Maggio, Rodger. [telephone communication]. 2013. To MRS. City blasting regulations. 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.14 Recreation This section describes the recreational setting of the Project Site and assesses the extent to which the Project would increase the use of existing or proposed parks, recreational facilities, and trails in the vicinity of the Project Site, and thereby result in the potential for physical impacts to those facilities. Information presented in the section is primarily based on information provided in the Parks and Recreation Element of the San Luis Obispo County General Plan (2006), the County of San Luis Obispo’s County Bikeways Plan (2005), the City of San Luis Obispo’s Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan (1982, amended 2001), and the City of San Luis Obispo’s Bicycle Transportation Plan (2007), as well as consultation with the San Luis Obispo City Parks and Recreation Department and San Luis Obispo County Parks. 4.14.1 Environmental Setting The Project Site is within the jurisdiction of the County of San Luis Obispo (County); however, it is also included in the City of San Luis Obispo (City) Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) for future incorporation into the City’s jurisdiction. Under the County General Plan, 76 percent or approximately 251 acres, of the Project Site is designated as Open Space. If implemented under the County Development Plan, the Project would designate 265 acres as Open Space, which is approximately 80 percent of the Project Site. Under the City’s AASP, approximately 83 percent of the Project Site, or 279 acres, is designated as Open Space. If implemented under the City Development Plan, the Project would designate 250 acres as Open Space, which is 75 percent of the total Project Site, and 15 acres as Recreation, which is 5 percent of the total Project Site. Currently, the Project Site is largely unused and there are no recreation facilities or uses on the site. According to San Luis Obispo County Parks, no County-designated trails are currently located or proposed on the land occupying the Project Site (Di Leo 2009a). The Bob Jones Pathway (“City to the Sea Trail”), a Class I bicycle path and pedestrian corridor, is west of the Project Site and extends west to Avila Beach. In addition, the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail “Auto Tour Route” follows State Route 227 through San Luis Obispo. The City Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan currently do not oversee trails or parkland on the Project Site. However, the City of San Luis Obispo’s Park and Recreation Element and Master Plan outlines implementation goals and policies concerning parkland acquisition, dedications, and improvements in annexation areas. The nearest City-owned open space and trail system is the South Street Hills, which occupy the major topographical feature to the north of the Project Site. The City’s AASP and City Bicycle Transportation Plan call for circulation improvements that include Class I bike paths and Class II bike lanes on the Project Site and in the general vicinity. Under both the City Development Plan and County Development Plan, 15 acres of the Project Site would be used for public sports fields. 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.14.1.1 Existing Local Recreation Opportunities The County of San Luis Obispo Parks Department is responsible for providing the County with a wide variety of recreation programs, planning new park facilities, and managing County open space that is accessible to the public. As discussed in the Parks and Recreation Element of the County’s General Plan, there are approximately 23 parks (mini, linear, neighborhood, community, and regional parks [urban and rural]), three golf courses, and eight Special Places currently operated by the County, as well as 11.8 acres of trails and staging areas (outside of parks)(SLOC 2006a). Similarly, the City of San Luis Obispo Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for providing the community with a wide variety of recreation programs, planning new park facilities, and managing City open space that is accessible to the public. City recreation facilities consist of mini-parks, neighborhood parks, community parks, joint use sites (such as school playgrounds), non-joint use sites, recreation centers, and special facilities, including swimming facilities, community gardens, and the Laguna Lake Golf Course. The following subsections discuss the existing parks, hiking trails, and bikeways operated by each respective agency. Figure 4.14-1 shows the existing recreation opportunities (e.g., parks, special facilities, and hiking trails) within the Project area. Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities County of San Luis Obispo According to the County’s Parks and Recreation Element, the total acreage operated by the County is approximately 1,246 park acres and 12,056 natural area acres (SLOC 2006a). Table 4.14-1 lists the parks operated by the County. Table 4.14-1 Existing Park Acreage Park Type Park Acres Natural Area Acres Regional Parks (Urban) 254 470 Regional Parks (Rural) 221 11,177 Mini, Neighborhood, and Community Parks 174.2 80 Special Placesa 24.1 239 Golf Courses 561 0 Trails and Staging Areas 11.8 0 Total Operated Acreage 1,246.1 12,056 a. Special Places include Natural Areas, coastal access, and historic facilities. A Natural Area is land protected for its resources, which may also afford some passive recreation. Source: SLOC 2006a. Mini-parks are the smallest type of park and range from 6,000 square feet up to five acres. Because of their small size, mini-parks offer passive recreation activities (e.g., landscaped area, children’s play equipment, and half basketball court). Linear parks are along corridors and tend to be narrow and long in configuration. As such, they often accommodate trails, bike paths, and other recreation amenities such as picnic areas, benches, scenic overlooks, interpretive displays, and even play areas and lawns. Neighborhood parks (15 or more acres) usually include passive recreation as well as some active recreation, such as children’s play equipment, hard courts, turf area, and individual picnic areas. Community parks (25 or more acres) provide recreation 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR facilities that serve a community and in some cases visitors from outside the local community. Community parks provide a mixture of active recreation, including but not limited to skate parks, sports fields, and swimming pools. Regional parks are the largest parks in the County, ranging in size from 200 acres for an urban regional park to 1,000 acres for a rural regional park. Regional parks provide recreation for the entire County, including tourists, and facilitate activities such as camping, hiking, trail use, and fishing. County parks within the County’s planning area include El Chorro Park and Cuesta Park. Located to the south of the Project Site are Oceano Memorial Park, Avila Beach Park, and the Bob Jones Bike Trail, with Lopez Lake Recreation Area, Biddle Regional Park and Nipomo Community Park to the southeast. Bishop Peak Natural Area is also within the County but the City is responsible for patrol, maintenance and management. City of San Luis Obispo According to the City’s Parks and Recreation Department, the City has approximately 4,000 acres of open space. According to the City’s Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan, the City has approximately 163 park acres and 71,220 square feet of recreational facilities. Mini- parks account for 3.2 acres, neighborhood parks for 32.93 acres, and community parks for 85.82 acres for a total of 121.95 acres of parkland for the City. As shown in Figure 4.14-1, the Project Site’s neighboring parks and recreation facilities include the Damon-Garcia Sports Fields, South Hills Open Space, and Sinsheimer Park. The Damon- Garcia Sports Complex is located at the corner of Broad Street (State Highway 227) and Industrial Way and is immediately adjacent to the northeast corner of the Project Site. This facility contains 20 acres of multi-use sports fields and support facilities and hosts exclusively turf-based sports, such as soccer, ultimate Frisbee, and rugby, on a reservation-only basis. The fields are also able to serve as a venue for special events (City 2011). The South Hills Open Space, nearly 60 acres of open space lands, is just north of the Project Site. Sinsheimer Park, which is also north of the Project Site, contains tennis courts, a softball field, picnic and barbeque areas, a baseball stadium, batting cages, a playground, a sand volleyball court, and a swimming pool. Existing and Proposed Trails and Bikeways County of San Luis Obispo The County’s parks provide several multi-use trails, including equestrian and pedestrian and bicycle trails. El Chorro Regional Park provides two trails ranging from approximately 0.7 to 1.5 miles in length. Bishop Peak Natural Area also has a 4-mile-round-trip moderate hike to the top of Bishop Peak. As previously stated, Bishop Peak Natural Area is patrolled, maintained and managed by the City. In addition to trails within County parks, the County also provides recreation and, at times, alternative transportation corridors outside of parks. For example, County Parks developed and maintains the Bob Jones City to the Sea Bike Path, a Class I bike path that extends west towards Avila Beach. Other trails located outside of a park or Natural Areas include multi-use trails (for bikes, pedestrians, and equestrians) such as the Cypress Ridge Trail and Hi Mountain Trail. For 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR many of these trail facilities, County Parks also maintains a staging area, which provides parking for the trail or bike path corridor. Figure 4.14-1 City of San Luis Obispo Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities Source: City 2013. The County Public Works Department administers the County’s Bikeways Plan. The County currently has 3 miles of Class I (off-street) bike paths, approximately 61 miles of Class II (on- street) bike lanes on 54 roads, and approximately 91 miles of existing Class III bike routes on 81 County roads. An additional 120 miles of Class II bikes lanes on 72 roads are proposed (SLOC 2010). Class I bike paths provide a completely separated right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with minimized cross-flow. Class II bike lanes provide a striped lane for one-way bike travel on a street or highway. Class III bikeways, designated by signs, provide a shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic. Designated under a Class III bike route, a bicycle boulevard is implemented with intermittent closures to motor vehicles. Table 4.14-2 lists existing and proposed County bikeways in the City fringe. As shown in the table, an existing Class II bikeway extends on Tank Farm Road from Higuera Street to State Route 227. 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.14-2 Existing and Proposed County Bikeways – City of San Luis Obispo Fringe Roadway From To Class Existing Bikeways Foothill Road Los Osos Valley Road San Luis Obispo City Limit II Higuera Street San Luis Obispo Creek San Luis Obispo City Limit II Higuera Street Ontario Road San Luis Obispo Creek II Higuera Street San Luis Obispo City Limit Ontario Road II O’Connor Way Foothill Road Camp San Luis Obispo II Orcutt Road Johnson Avenue Tank Farm Road II Orcutt Road Tank Farm Road Avocado Road II Tank Farm Road Higuera Street Highway 227 II Proposed Bikeways Buckley Road Highway 227 Vachell Lane II Orcutt Road Avocado Road Biddle Ranch Road II Vachell Lane Buckley Road South Higuera Street II Source: SLOC 2005. City of San Luis Obispo The City also provides several existing multi-use trails, including equestrian and pedestrian/bicycle paths. Figure 4.14-2 shows the existing Class I bicycle paths, Class II bicycle lanes, and Class III bicycle routes in the City. There are more than 25 miles of bike lanes along major streets within the City. It is the City’s long-term goal to establish and maintain Class II bike lanes along all arterial streets and highways (except U.S. Highway 101) since these corridors provide the most direct access to important destinations and are frequently used by commuting bicyclists (City 2007). Currently, the City maintains 1.5 miles of Class I bicycle paths along the 4.5-mile stretch of the Union Pacific Railroad that bisects the City, known as the Railroad Safety Trail. Class III bike routes traverse a number of streets in residential and commercial districts that cyclists use to connect to the Class II bike lane network. The Bill Roalman Bicycle Boulevard on Morro Street extends from Marsh Street to Santa Barbara Street and includes, at the closure of the street at its south end, a traffic signal at the Morro-Upham- Santa Barbara intersection. The Bob Jones trail is a Class I bike path, part of which runs between Prado Road and Los Osos Valley Road near the Project Site. The Railroad Recreational Trail is a Class I bike path that runs along the Union Pacific Railroad along California Boulevard into California Polytechnic State University. The City’s AASP and Bicycle Transportation Plan call for circulation improvements that include Class I bicycle paths and Class II bicycle lanes within the immediate area of the Project Site. The Bicycle Transportation Plan shows that two of the primary north-south bicycle facilities are Class I paths that parallel the Acacia/East Branch of San Luis Obispo Creek and Tank Farm Creek riparian corridors. 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.14-2 City of San Luis Obispo Existing and Proposed Bicycle Transportation Plans Source: City of San Luis Obispo GIS Division Figure 2A & 2B Bicycle Transportation Plan Existing & Proposed Bikeways, February 2007. Other Class I paths include Tank Farm Road, within the open space area between the Unocal Collector (i.e., local street at the Northwest Operations Area) and Santa Fe Road on both sides see Figure 4.14-2 and Figure 2-18 in Chapter 2.0, Project Description). The Class I paths would also provide pedestrian circulation by connecting to the street system. Additionally, Class II paths (lanes within the roadway right-of-ways) would be present on Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road, as well as the proposed local and collector streets. As shown in Figure 4.14-2, the Project Site is traversed by several proposed Class I bike paths and Class II bike lanes, including the proposed bicycle paths associated with Tank Farm Road. Adequacy of Existing County and City Parkland During the 1980s, national park standards were developed to help communities plan for adequate park acreage to meet the future demand. Table 4.14-3 lists the 1983 National Recreation and Park Association Standards for parklands. 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 4.14-3 1983 National Recreation and Park Association Standards for Parks Classification Acres/1,000 People Size Range Population Served Service Area Neighborhood Parks 1-2 15 + acres A Neighborhood, Approx. 5,000 ¼ - ½ mile Community Parks 5-8 25 + acres Several Neighborhoods 1-2 miles Regional Metropolitan Parks 5-10 200 + acres Several Communities 1 hour driving time Regional Park Reserve Variable 1,000 + acres Several Communities 1 hour driving time Special Areas No Applicable Standard Includes linear parks, trails, beaches, golf courses, historical sites, flood plains, and coastal access ways. No standard is applicable. Conservancy Natural Areas) No Applicable Standard Protection and management of the natural and cultural environment with recreational use as a secondary objective. Source: SLOC 2006a. Experience demonstrates that most communities, including the County, have not been able to consistently meet the standards. For example, the 2005 population for the County would require the immediate acquisition and development of an additional 2,700 acres of local and regional parkland based on traditional park planning standards (SLOC 2006a). According to the County Parks and Recreation Element, the best indication of how well a community is meeting its park and recreation needs is the ratio of neighborhood and community parkland per 1,000 residents. As shown in Table 4.14-3, the national standard for community parkland is five to eight acres per 1,000 residents. According to the County, it provides less than two acres of neighborhood and community parkland per 1,000 residents (SLOC 2006a). As stated in the Parks and Recreation Element, providing a minimum of three acres of such parkland per 1,000 people in each of the County’s unincorporated communities is a reasonable goal for the near future (SLOC 2006a). According to Policy 3.13.1 of the City of San Luis Obispo’s Parks and Recreation Element, the City shall develop and maintain a park system at the rate of 10 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The current General Plan Update has the City’s total park acreage at approximately 157 acres, with 3.55 acres of parkland per 1,000 residences (Murry 2013). This falls below the current recommended City standard of 10 acres per 1,000 residences. Proposed Parks and Recreation Facilities In addition to information on existing recreation opportunities in the County, the County Parks and Recreation Element provides information on proposed facilities within the San Luis Obispo Planning Area. Most of the proposed facilities have not undergone a master planning process or been funded. According to the Parks and Recreation Element, the proposed facilities lists represent the desires of the communities and the County in general. The City’s Parks and Recreation Element lists major unmet needs for parks and recreational facilities in the City including athletic fields, a multi-use community center and therapy pool, and new neighborhood parks. Since the publication of the City’s Parks and Recreation Element, the City has started to fulfill the listed unmet needs by constructing and improving existing park facilities, including 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR developing the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex, located north-northeast from the Project Site, and installing a therapy pool within the San Luis Obispo Center at Sinsheimer Park. 4.14.2 Regulatory Setting 4.14.2.1 Federal Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 United States Code 12181) prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in public accommodation and state and local government services. Pursuant to the ADA, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board issues guidelines to ensure that facilities, public sidewalks, and street crossings are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Play areas, meeting rooms, park restrooms, and other buildings and park structures must comply with ADA requirements. Recreational facilities proposed as part of the Project must comply with ADA requirements. 4.14.2.2 State The Quimby Act The 1975 Quimby Act (California Government Code §66477) authorized cities and counties to pass ordinances requiring developers to set aside land, donate conservation easements, or pay fees for park improvements. Revenues generated through the Quimby Act cannot be used for the operation and maintenance of park facilities. The Quimby Act authorizes a minimum contribution of three acres; if a jurisdiction has an existing park standard greater than three acres, the jurisdiction can require contributions equal to its standard up to five acres per 1,000 people. The Quimby Act is implemented through County ordinance (see discussion in Section 4.14.2.3, County). 4.14.2.3 County Public Facilities Fees Ordinance, Title 18 of the San Luis Obispo County Code The County of San Luis Obispo Public Facilities Fees Ordinance, Title 18 of the County Code, allows the County to charge public facilities fees for new development projects within the County to mitigate impacts caused by such projects. The intent of the fee is to provide new or expanded public facilities, such as parks, libraries, new government offices, and police and fire stations, for the new populations generated by new development. In terms of the park component of the fee, only new residential development (not commercial or industrial development) generates this fee. The fee may be used to acquire, design, and develop new facilities, such as park and recreation facilities. The fees may not be used for maintenance of new facilities. The County of San Luis Obispo Public Facilities Financing Plan for Unincorporated Area The County of San Luis Obispo Public Facilities Financing Plan for Unincorporated Area Facilities documents the amount (e.g., acres of park land per capita) and cost of new capital facilities required to serve development in unincorporated areas through the year 2025. The Board of Supervisors reviews the Public Facilities Financing Plan annually. This plan sets the 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Public Facility fee rate, a potential source of funding paid by new development to fund its fair share of facilities needs. The Public Facilities Financing Plan designates the maximum rate of those fees. Quimby Ordinance, Title 21 of the San Luis Obispo County Code The County’s Real Property Division Ordinance implements the County’s Quimby Ordinance. The County’s Quimby Ordinance establishes: (1) the County’s desired park-to-population ratio of 3 acres of neighborhood or community parkland per 1,000 new population generated; (2) criteria for when new development shall pay a fee rather than provide parkland; and (3) criteria for obtaining a credit for a private park or recreation proposed within a new residential development. The Board of Supervisors periodically reviews and sets the County’s Quimby Fee. When a fee is to be paid in lieu of land dedication, the amount of the fee is generally based on the anticipated cost of acquiring new park acreage or developing a new park. County of San Luis Obispo Parks and Recreation Element The Parks and Recreation Element is an integral part of the General Plan for developing new parks and recreation as well as protecting the County’s natural resources by designating and preserving land as County Natural Areas. The mission of County Parks is to ensure diversified opportunities for recreation and the personal enrichment of the County’s residents and visitors while protecting its natural, cultural, and historical resources. The Parks and Recreation Element of the County’s General Plan also sets a goal of a minimum of three acres of parkland per 1,000 people in each of the County’s unincorporated areas. Section 4.4, Land Use and Policy Consistency Analysis, discusses the proposed Project’s consistency with the applicable goals and policies of the Parks and Recreation Element. 4.14.2.4 City City of San Luis Obispo Parks and Recreation Master Plan Element The Parks and Recreation Element is an integral part of the General Plan for developing new parks and recreation. The mission of the City Parks is to serve all persons in a positive and courteous manner and help ensure that San Luis Obispo continues to be a healthy, safe, attractive, and enjoyable place to live, work, and visit. The City’s Parks and Recreation Element establishes goals for providing parkland for residents, and also provides a framework in Appendix C for achieving General Plan park system goals in annexation areas. Applicable policies and programs related to the annexation areas and the Project include: Policy 2.51.1: The City shall develop and maintain a park system at the rate of 10 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Five acres shall be dedicated as a neighborhood park. The remaining five acres required under the 10 acres per 1000 residents in the residential annexation policy may be located anywhere within the City’s park system as deemed appropriate. Policy 2.52.4: New significant residential developments and annexations shall provide sufficient athletic fields to meet the demands of the youth who will reside in the development. Program 2.52.5: As space becomes available, additional fields will be added in the vicinity of the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex. 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.14.3 Significance Criteria The following criteria are based on the City and County’s Initial Study and Appendix G of CEQA Guidelines. The effects of the proposed Project on recreation are considered significant if the proposed Project would: Increase the demand for recreational facilities and services which exceeds existing supply, capacity, or planned capacity (including feasible expansion of recreational facilities) that could be developed; Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated; Negatively impact access to trails, parks, or other recreation opportunities; Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment; or Reduce the supply of public parkland below the City and County standards. 4.14.4 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact REC.1 The remediation activities could have a potential effect on existing recreational facilities and users. Remediation Class III The remediation component of the Project would occur over a three-year period and include: demolishing existing buildings, excavating top soil, site recontouring, capping, and mitigating existing impacts to wetland and rare plant habitats. The proposed remediation is designed to ensure that future open space uses of the Project Site do not pose an unacceptable risk to potential ecological receptors, which include birds and burrowing animals. Currently, no recreation facilities or County-designated trails are located or proposed on the land occupying the Project Site. However, the Project Site contains an existing Class II Bikeway striped bike lane) on both sides of Tank Farm Road that would remain active during the remediation component of the Project. The remediation component of the Project would bring construction workers to the site, however their presence at the site would be temporary and would vary due to the type of construction activities being conducted (i.e., site grading construction of structures, or infrastructure improvements). Although construction workers could use recreational facilities in the area, typically construction activities do not contribute to the use of, or negatively affect, parks and recreational facilities. 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The Project includes the removal of the Flower Mound located at northeastern portion of the Project Site. Removal of the Flower Mound would potentially result in increased wind speeds about 5.6 percent of the time on the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex athletic fields located to the northeast. See Figures 2-2, 2-14 and 4.14-1. However, the removal of the Flower Mound would likely result in a decrease in wind speeds about 41 percent of the time by removing the wind flow restriction that funnels the wind between the Flower Mound and the hills to the north. Since the prevailing winds in the area are from the northwest (as measured at the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport), the net result of the Flower Mound removal would be an overall decrease in winds at the athletic fields. Therefore, remediation would not increase the use or demand for parks or other recreational facilities, nor accelerate existing facilities deterioration. In addition, remediation would not affect access to trails, parks, or other recreation opportunities since none currently exist on the Project Site. As such, the remediation component of the Project would have no effect on recreation. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts Since there are no remediation-related impacts on recreation identified, there would be no residual impacts on recreation from the remediation component of the Project. As such residual impacts would be less than significant (Class III). 4.14.5 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact REC.2 The City Development Plan would increase the City’s recreational acreage stock with 15 acres of sports fields, as well as Class I and Class II bicycle lanes, while not adding residential development. Development Class IV The City Development Plan would increase the City’s park acreage by approximately eight percent. The City Plan would result in approximately 800,000 square feet of facilities for business-park and service commercial uses. The Project Site is included in the City’s AASP that anticipates future annexation of this and other properties in the area given its proximity to existing City boundaries. Adhering to the AASP, the Project would keep 250 acres of environmentally sensitive portions of the Project Site as open space. Under the City Development Plan, the proposal also includes designation of approximately 15 acres for public recreational use to be developed as active sports fields. A proposal by Cal Ripkin Baseball has been submitted to the Applicant for development of the recreational area into three baseball fields, batting cages, parking, and amenities. More details on the baseball proposal are included in the Project Description, Section 2.5.1.1, Figure 2-19, and Appendix A, pages 45-47. The baseball fields would be privately funded, and would require the Applicant to apply to the City for development of the fields. 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Additionally, the Project would increase the number of bike paths available to the public. Currently, the Project Site contains an existing Class II Bikeway (striped bike lane) on both sides of Tank Farm Road. Both directions of this bikeway would remain as part of the Project. In addition to the existing Class II Bikeway, the Project proposes the following: Construction of a Class I Bikeway in the following areas (refer to Figure 2-18): Along the north side of Tank Farm Road and extending around the northwest quadrant of the Project Site; Along the east side of the ball fields from Road “B” north to the Project boundary; West of the ball fields from Tank Farm Road north to the Project boundary; Along the southeastern boundary of the Project Site running south from Tank Farm Road on the western side of Santa Fe Road. Construction of a Class II Bikeway on the Santa Fe Road extension along both sides of Tank Farm Road. The proposed bike lane improvements proposed in the City Development Plan would be the same as in the County Development Plan. For purposes of analyzing typical development project impacts on recreation, only residential projects are usually considered potentially impactful since employees of businesses are not expected to utilize recreational facilities as frequently or for extended periods of time as residents would. In addition, the increase in daytime population as a result of the presence of construction workers is temporary in nature and varies due to the type of construction activities being conducted (i.e., site grading construction of structures, or infrastructure improvements). Although construction workers could use recreational facilities in the area, typically construction activities do not contribute to the use or affect parks and recreational facilities. The Project would not develop any residential units and as such would not increase the use or demand for parks or other recreational opportunities, nor accelerate deterioration of such facilities. Therefore, by increasing the City’s recreational opportunities without substantially increasing the population that uses them, the Project’s effect on City recreation facilities would be beneficial Class IV). Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts The proposed 15 acres of recreational sports fields as well as the addition of bike lanes that would be developed by this Project would reduce the demand for existing City parks. Therefore, residual impacts of this component of the Project under the City Development Plan would be beneficial (Class IV). 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.14.6 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact REC.3 The County Development Plan would increase the County’s recreational acreage stock with 15 acres of sports fields, as well as Class I and Class II bicycle lanes, while not adding residential development. Development Class IV The County Development Plan proposes to develop approximately 800,000 square feet of facilities for business-park and service commercial uses in an unincorporated area of the County. Under the County Plan, 15 acres of the Project Site would be developed for active recreation consisting of public sports fields. A proposal by Cal Ripkin Baseball has been submitted to the Applicant for development of the recreational area into three baseball fields, batting cages, parking, and amenities. More details on the baseball proposal are included in the Project Description, Section 2.5.1.1, Figure 2-19, and Appendix A, pages 45-47. The baseball fields would be privately funded, and would require the applicant to apply to the County for development of the fields. The development of the recreation facilities would increase the County’s recreational park acreage by approximately 6 percent. The County Development Plan also designates the 250 acres of open space provided by this Project as recreational acreage, giving the County’s recreational inventory a 261-acre total increase. Additionally, the County Plan would increase the number of bike paths available to the public. Currently, the Project Site contains an existing Class II Bikeway (striped bike lane) on both sides of Tank Farm Road. Both directions of this bikeway would remain as part of the Project. In addition to the existing Class II Bikeway, the Project proposes the following: Construction of a Class I Bikeway in the following areas (refer to Figure 2-18): Along the north side of Tank Farm Road and extending around the northwest quadrant of the Project Site; Along the east side of the ball fields from Road “B” north to the Project boundary; West of the ball fields from Tank Farm Road north to the Project boundary; Along the southeastern boundary of the Project Site running south from Tank Farm Road on the western side of Santa Fe Road. Construction of a Class II Bikeway on the Santa Fe Road extension along both sides of Tank Farm Road. The proposed bike lane improvements proposed in the County Development Plan would be the same as in the City Development Plan. 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR For purposes of analyzing typical development project impacts on recreation, only residential projects are considered potentially impactful since employees of businesses are not expected to utilize recreational facilities as frequently or for extended periods of time as residents would. The temporary increase in daytime population due to the presence of construction workers is also not expected to contribute to the use or affect of parks and recreational facilities, as their presence at the Project Site is limited. The Project would not develop any residential units and as such would not increase the use or demand for parks or other recreational opportunities, nor accelerate deterioration of such facilities. Therefore, by increasing the County’s recreational opportunities without increasing the population that uses them, the Project’s impact on County recreation facilities would be beneficial (Class IV). Mitigation Measure No mitigation measures are required. Residual Impacts The proposed 15 acres of recreational sports fields as well as the addition of bike lanes that would be developed by the Project would reduce the demand for existing County parks. Therefore, residual impacts of the Project under the County Development Plan would be beneficial (Class IV). 4.14.7 Cumulative Analysis Under the CEQA Guidelines, “a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the environmental impact report (“EIR”) together with other projects causing related impacts.” Section 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in section 15065(c). An EIR need not discuss impacts that do not result in part from the project evaluated in that EIR. The Cumulative discussion does not need to provide as much detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone. The discussion of cumulative impacts shall be guided by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and shall focus on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute rather than the attributes of other projects which do not contribute to the cumulative impact.”(CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)). Proposed development in the City and County would not significantly affect recreational resources proposed by this Project, but would actually increase the City and County’s recreational acreage and reduce the demand for existing City and County parks. 4.14.7.1 Cumulative Analysis City Development Plan Impacts The City Development Plan would not significantly affect recreational resources. The increase in recreational acreage proposed by the Project is a beneficial impact that would reduce the demand for additional recreational resources by increasing the City’s park acreage by eight percent and implementing Class I and Class II bike lanes, which could also be used for recreation. The Project does not propose any residential units and would not increase the use or demand for parks or other recreational opportunities, nor accelerate the deterioration of such facilities 4.14 Recreation December 2013 4.14-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR elsewhere in the City. Therefore, the increase in recreational opportunities provided by the Project would be beneficial. As identified in Table 3-1, proposed residential development in the City would result in the development of additional acreage, to which these developments would be subject to City review for parks and recreation impacts. These developments include nine related residential projects featuring a total of 904 residential units. Assuming two persons per lot or unit, a total of 1,808 new residents would be added to the City’s population. This population increase warrants the incorporation of additional park acreage to meet the needs of these future residents, which is what would be required by these cumulative developments either in the form of actual park acreage or in-lieu fees. The park acreage provided by the City Development Plan would help offset any deficiencies created by payment of in-lieu fees for residential cumulative projects. The City Development Plan would thus be beneficial as it provides additional park acreage to help the City meet its recreation requirement of five to eight acres per 1,000 residents. The implementation of the nine proposed commercial projects in the City would not increase the resident population on related project sites but could result in the increased use of recreational facilities during scheduled break periods. However, the use of recreational facilities by employees is for limited periods of time and is not expected to impact recreational opportunities for residents. 4.14.7.2 Cumulative Analysis County Development Plan Impacts The County Development Plan would not significantly affect recreational resources. The increase in recreational acreage proposed by the County Plan is a beneficial impact that would reduce the demand for additional recreational resources by increasing the County’s recreational park acreage by 6 percent and implementing Class I bike paths, which can be used for recreation. The County Plan does not propose any residential units and would not substantially increase the use or demand for parks or other recreational opportunities, nor accelerate the deterioration of such facilities elsewhere in the County. Therefore, the increase in recreational opportunities provided by the Project would be beneficial. As identified in Table 3-1, proposed residential development in the County would result in the development of additional acreage, to which developments would be subject to County review for parks and recreation impacts. Related developments within the County that would impact requirements for park acreage include one mixed-use project in the conceptual review stage that would provide 550 housing units. Assuming that two residents might occupy one unit, this would increase the residential population by 1,100 residents, which would require approximately 10 recreational acres, per County development requirements. No other residential projects are proposed for the County under the Cumulative Development Scenario. Regarding other types of development, there are 10 industrial projects and one approved commercial project that includes two 10,000 square foot buildings with parking and landscaping. Commercial and industrial projects would not impact the County’s recreational facility requirement as these developments only contribute to temporary increases in workforce population, therefore not impacting the residential population, in addition to the fact that the 4.14 Recreation Chevron Tank Farm 4.14-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR designated ratio measuring required recreational acreage is measured in acres per 1,000 residents. The County Development Plan would thus be beneficial as it provides additional park acreage to help the County meet its recreation requirement of 10 acres per 1,000 residents. The implementation of industrial and commercial uses would not increase the resident population on related project sites but could result in the increased use of recreational facilities during scheduled break periods. However, the use of recreational facilities by employees is for limited periods of time and is not expected to impact recreational opportunities for residents. 4.14.8 Mitigation Monitoring Plan No mitigation measures are required because all recreation-related impacts associated with the Project are considered either less than significant or beneficial. 4.14.9 References City of San Luis Obispo (City). 2013. Parks and Recreation Department. http://www.slocity.org/ParksandRecreation/download/rangers/mapfacilitiesaltgreen.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2013. 2011. Parks and Recreation, Damon-Garcia Sports Fields. Accessed: August 26, 2011. 2007. Bicycle Transportation Plan. 2001. Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Di Leo, Jan [telephone communication]. 2009a. To Envicom Corporation. San Luis Obispo County parklands and bike paths. Di Leo, Jan [e-mail communication]. 2009b. To Envicom Corporation. San Luis Obispo County parklands acreage to population ratio. Kiser, Betsy [telephone communication]. 2009a. To Envicom Corporation. City parklands acreage to population ratio. 2009b. To Envicom Corporation. El Chorro Park joint-use agreement. Murry, Kim [telephone communication]. 2013. To MRS. City parklands acreage from General Plan Update. San Luis Obispo County (SLOC). 2010. Bikeways Plan Update. 2006a. Parks and Recreation Element [In]: San Luis Obispo County General Plan. 2006b. Public Facilities Financing Plan for Unincorporated Area Facilities. County parkland supply. 2005. Bikeways Plan. 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.15 Agricultural Resources This section summarizes existing agricultural conditions on the Project Site and adjacent properties. Applicable state, regional, and local policies regarding agricultural resources and their potential conversion to nonagricultural uses are also identified. Additionally, this section examines potential impacts the Project could have on agricultural resources, and identifies mitigation measures that would serve to minimize these impacts. 4.15.1 Environmental Setting 4.15.1.1 Agricultural Lands The California Department of Conservation administers the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), which produces maps and statistical data used for analyzing impacts on California’s agricultural resources. Current land use information and soils survey data provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCS) contribute to this program’s database. These maps are updated every two years with the use of a computer mapping system, aerial imagery, public review, and field reconnaissance. This program designates land use into one of the following mapping categories (CDC 2004): Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Prime Farmland – Land with the best combination of physical and chemical features able to sustain long-term production of agricultural crops. This land has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high yields. Land must have been used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date. Farmland of Statewide Importance – Land similar to Prime Farmland that has a good combination of physical and chemical characteristics for the production of agricultural crops. This land has minor shortcomings, such as greater slopes or less ability to store soil moisture than Prime Farmland. Unique Farmland – Lesser quality soils used for the production of the state’s leading agricultural crops. This land is usually irrigated, but may include non-irrigated orchards or vineyards as found in some climatic zones in California. Farmland of Local Importance – Land of importance to the local agricultural economy as determined by each county’s board of supervisors and a local advisory committee. San Luis Obispo County (County) considers dairies, dry land farming, aquaculture, and uncultivated areas with soils as qualifying for Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance. Local Potential – These are areas with soils that qualify for Prime or Statewide Importance designations, but which are not cultivated or irrigated. Only certain counties, such as the County, have chosen to use the Local Potential designation. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Grazing Land – Land on which the existing vegetation is suited to the grazing of livestock. This category is used only in California and was developed in cooperation with the California Cattlemen’s Association, University of California Cooperative Extension, and other groups interested in the extent of grazing. Urban and Built-Up Land – Land occupied by structures with a building density of at least 1 unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately six structures to a 10-acre parcel. Other Land – Land that does not meet the criteria of any other category. Water – Water areas with an extent of at least 40 acres. County of San Luis Obispo General Plan – Agricultural Element The San Luis Obispo County General Plan Agriculture Element contains a general description of the main types and uses of agricultural land within the County. These include the general headings of irrigated lands, dry farm lands, and rangelands for grazing. Irrigated lands include row crops terrain and soils, as well as specialty crops/forage lands. Dry farm lands consist of mixed croplands and dry croplands. Rangelands for grazing mainly consist of cattle ranching. The definitions of these types of farmland follow: Row Crops Terrain and Soils – Various types of vegetables, seed crops, orchards, and other irrigated specialty crops characterize these lands. Property sizes generally range from 10 acres to hundreds of acres with soils mainly in land capability Classes I and II. Specialty Crops and Forage Lands – These areas are characterized by irrigated orchards and vineyards such as wine grapes, avocados, citrus, and apples. Irrigated uses such as alfalfa and pasture may be found in these areas. Property sizes generally range from 20 acres to a few hundred acres with soils mainly in land capability Classes III and IV. Mixed Croplands – Dry farm orchards and vineyards and specialty or high value field crops characterize mixed croplands. Property sizes generally range from 40 acres to several hundred acres with soils consisting mainly of land capacity Classes III and IV. Dry Croplands – These areas are characterized by grain and hay production. Barley, wheat, and oat hay are the principal crops. Other crops include dry beans and safflower. Dry croplands may also include grain stubble fields and intervening non-cultivated areas that provide seasonal forage for livestock. Property sizes generally range from 80 to several thousand acres with soils consisting mainly of land capacity Classes III and IV. Class VI land has also been commonly used for grain production. Rangelands for Grazing – Grazing land accounts for a large percentage of the privately owned land in the County with cattle ranching being the predominant use on these lands. The topography is mainly rolling and on steep slopes between 30 and 75 percent. Rangelands may also include small intervening valleys and ridge tops that have limited use or potential as farmland. The soils consist mainly of land capacity Classes IV, VI, and VII. Property sizes generally range from 100 acres to thousands of acres, depending on the carrying capacity of the rangelands. 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.15.1.2 Agricultural Production The County continually ranks in the top 20 of California counties for agricultural production. In 2011, County agricultural production totaled $736.2 million. The valuation of County agricultural production increased approximately 3 percent from 2010 to 2011 (from $712.8 million to $736.2 million). In 2011, the top five crops by value in San Luis Obispo County were: strawberries ($179 million), wine grapes ($129.7 million), cattle and calves ($66.8 million), broccoli ($46.2 million), and vegetable transplants ($34.8 million) (SLOCDOA 2011). 4.15.1.3 Agricultural Preserves The County’s agricultural preserve program was created to implement the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. It identifies areas where the County is willing to enter into a Land Conservation Act (Williamson Act) contract with property owners based on an approved set of criteria (SLOCDOA 2006). Lands that enter into the County’s agricultural preserve program are subject to zoning restrictions including parcel size restrictions ranging from 40 acres for prime land and 100 acres for nonprime land. A Land Conservation Act contract is a legal contract between a landowner and a land-regulating agency under the Land Conservation Act (i.e., the County). Under a Land Conservation Act contract, the property owner agrees not to develop the property for a period of 10 to 20 years in exchange for property tax reductions based on the property’s value as open space or agricultural, rather than developable land. The contract automatically renews each year for a new 10-year period unless the owner files a Notice of Non- renewal to indicate his or her intention to terminate the contract at the end of the current 10-year period. Land Conservation Act contracts may also be terminated by a public agency if the property under contract is being acquired for another purpose in the public’s interest under eminent domain or other public acquisition procedures. The Project Site does not fall within a Williamson Act contract, nor do any of the adjacent properties. 4.15.1.4 Agricultural Soils The USDA NRCS assesses the agricultural capacity of soils through its Land Capability Classification system, which groups soils primarily on the basis of their capability to produce common cultivated crops and pasture plants without deteriorating over a long period of time. This classification system is subdivided into eight capability classes. Class I soils have slight limitations that restrict their use, while Class II soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require moderate conservation practices. Soils with a capability Class I and Class II are generally considered to be “Prime” soils. Prime soils indicate the presence of Prime Farmland. According to the USDA, Prime Farmland is land best suited for producing food, feed, forage, fiber and oilseed crops and has the combination of soil properties, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high yields of crops (USDA 2010a). 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR California Government Code, Section 51201(c), identifies “Prime agricultural land” as: i) All land that qualifies for rating as class I or class II in the Natural Resource Conservation Service land use capability classifications; ii) Land which qualifies for rating 80 through 100 in the Storie Index Rating; iii) Land which supports livestock used for the production of food and fiber and which has an annual carrying capacity equivalent to at least one animal unit per acre as defined by the United States Department of Agriculture; iv) Land planted with fruit- or nut-bearing trees, vines, bushes, or crops which have a nonbearing period of less than five years and which will normally return during the commercial bearing period on an annual basis from the production of unprocessed agricultural plant production not less than two hundred dollars ($200) per acre; and v) Land which has returned from the production of unprocessed agricultural plant products an annual gross value of not less than two hundred dollars ($200) per acre for three of the previous five years (Williamson Act 2010). As indicated above, an additional method of rating soils is known as the Storie Index, which is based on soil characteristics that govern the land’s potential utilization and productive capacity. Soils are assigned a value between zero and 100 depending on the following factors: i) Characteristics of the soil profile; ii) Texture of the surface soil; iii) Slope of the soil body; and iv) Conditions of the soil, such as drainage, alkali content, nutrient level, erosion, and microrelief. The values of the four factors are multiplied to produce the Storie Index rating of the soil. For simplification, soils are placed into one of six soil grades depending on their suitability for agricultural cultivation. Grade 1 (excellent) is for soils with a value between 80 and 100. Grades 2 through 5 (good to very poor) are for soils with a value between 79 and 10. Grade 6 nonagriculture) is for soils with a value below 10 and are not suitable for agriculture (UC 1978). 4.15.1.5 Noxious Weed Species The Project Site contains several invasive and noxious weeds, as identified in Section 4.2, Biological Resources. These weeds include, but are not limited to, curly dock (Rumex crispus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus), and yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) (USDA 2010c). Curly dock is a perennial herb usually found in wetlands that spreads easily and, once established, takes over habitat by pushing out native species (CIPC 2010). 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-5 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Poison hemlock is a perennial herb that was introduced to the United States in the 1800s. It suppresses light and can crowd out other vegetation. Additionally, it is toxic to all organisms, including humans, livestock, and wildlife. Populations of this plant appear to be stable statewide, however, poison hemlock can be moved by farm machinery, vehicles, and clothing (CIPC 2010). Yellow nutsedge is a perennial herb that is not native to California and has a rapid vegetative spread rate (USDA 2010c). Yellow starthistle is an annual plant that has become one of the most prominent noxious weeds in California, infesting more than 12 million acres throughout the state. This native of Eurasia is extremely competitive, invading cropland, pastures, and rangeland, increasing farming costs and reducing productivity. In addition, yellow starthistle is toxic to horses. Yellow starthistle is common throughout most of the County. The spread of noxious weeds has the potential to occur during the construction phase of the Project as equipment is transferred from one area of the Project Site to another. As part of the final restoration plan, which requires weed management methods during construction, monitoring, maintenance, and adaptive management activities, particular species of non-native noxious weedy plant species would be targeted for immediate removal if or when they are documented on the Project Site. See Section 2.4.4 in the Project Description and Section 4.2.4 in Biological Resources. 4.15.1.6 Land Use The Project Site, consisting of approximately 332 acres of land, as shown in Figure 4.15-1, is a predominantly vacant site, with remnants of its previous use as a petroleum storage and distribution facility. In the northwestern portion of the site, referred to as the Northwest Operations Area, three buildings, utility lines, a paved parking lot, fencing, and other ancillary facilities remain. The southern and northeastern portions of the site are essentially vacant; however, some remnants of former reservoirs are still present in differing conditions. At present, the site is mostly unused, except for the existing buildings in the northwestern portion of the Project Site that are currently used as Chevron offices. In addition, cattle graze on-site for fire prevention and weed control. Soils The distribution and characteristics of soils within the Project Site are detailed in Table 4.15-1. Figure 4.15-2 shows the NRCS Farmland Classifications and Figure 4.15-3 shows the California Revised Storie Index. As identified in Table 4.15.-1, the predominant (92.4 percent) on-site soil is Xererts-Xerolls- Urban land complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, which is classified with a Storie Index Rating of zero (Not Rated) and designated as Not Prime Farmland. This soil dominates the majority of the Project Site at approximately 307 acres (USDA 2010b). 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.15-1 Existing Uses of Land Note: The figure shows existing uses of land, not land use designations per the City and County General Plans. Source: Envicom Corporation, August 2009; MRS 2012 Table 4.15-1 Soil Characteristics and Farmland Classifications Soil Type Acreage approx.) Storie Rating Storie Grade NRCS Rating Farmland Classification Cropley clay, 0-2% slopes 12 44 Grade 3 Fair Prime Farmland If Irrigated Prime Gazos-Lodo clay loams, 30-50% slopes 6 31 Grade 4 Poor Not Prime Farmland Other Marimel sandy clay loam, occasionally flooded 7 65 Grade 2 Good Prime Farmland If Irrigated and Drained Prime Salinas silty clay loam, 0-2% slopes 1 88 Grade 1 Excellent Prime Farmland If Irrigated Prime Xerertes-Xerolls-Urban land complex, 0-15% slopes 307 Not Rated Not Rated Not Prime Farmland Other Notes: Figure 2-6 identifies affected soil areas resulting from petroleum releases over the years, including the 1926 fire, which contribute to the Not Prime Farmland designation and preclude agricultural uses other than grazing. Source: USDA 2010b 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-7 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 4.15-2 Farmland Classification Source: USDA 2010b Figure 4.15-3 California Revised Storie Index Source: USDA 2010b 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Soils of the Cropley clay complex, encompassing approximately 12 acres (3.6 percent) of the Project Site, are classified as Prime Farmland If Irrigated by the NRCS and have a Storie Index Rating of 44 or Grade 3 – Fair suitability for intensive agriculture (USDA 2010b). Soils of the Gazos-Lodo clay loams complex, encompassing approximately six acres (1.7 percent) of the Project Site, are classified as Not Prime Farmland by the NRCS and have a Storie Index Rating of 31 or Grade 4 – Poor suitability for intensive agriculture (USDA 2010b). Soils of the Marimel sandy clay loam complex, encompassing approximately seven acres (2 percent) of the Project Site, are classified as Prime Farmland If Irrigated and Drained by the NRCS and have a Storie Index Rating of 65 or Grade 2 – Good suitability for intensive agriculture (USDA 2010b). Soils of the Salinas silty clay loam complex, encompassing less than one acre (0.2 percent) of the Project Site, are classified as Prime Farmland If Irrigated by the NRCS and have a Storie Index Rating of 88 or Grade 1 – Excellent suitability for intensive agriculture (USDA 2010b). 4.15.1.7 Surrounding Land Use As shown in Figure 4.15-1 a variety of land uses surround the Project Site. Agricultural uses abut all, or portions of, each of the site’s sides. The northern side of the Project Site is bound by undeveloped land used for grazing. The northwestern side of the site abuts 32 acres of level, row crop terrain (north of Tank Farm Road). Active row crop terrain and hay-cropped land abuts the southern side of the site (near Esperanza Lane) and land used for livestock grazing also abuts the southern side of the site. The San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport (SLOCRA) is southeast of the site, with runways oriented northwest to southeast. Areas containing developed industrial and business parks with light manufacturing, commercial offices, and service uses lie to the northwest of the site (south of Meissner Lane), to the west of the site along Suburban Road (and south of Tank Farm Road), and to the southeast of the site. Recently developed parkland is northeast of the site and a mobile home park is east of the site (north of Tank Farm Road). The closest residential uses are the mobile home park and scattered residences within agricultural lands. The Project Site is within a swath of land within the upper reaches of the Los Osos Valley that remains either open space or in agricultural use. This area is flanked to the west, east, and northeast by urban and suburban land uses within the City of San Luis Obispo (City), including the areas along the highway and local road approaches from the southwest (U.S. Highway 101 and South Higuera Street) and the southeast (along Broad Street). Areas immediately abutting the site still exhibit a semi-rural character, especially the lands north and south of the site. Much of the area is currently developed as semi-rural areas with a mix of agricultural and grazing land. This open agricultural land comprises most of the Project Site and its vicinity and is within the Urban Reserve Line of the City. Although past development and current use have resulted in relatively low acreage of farmland classifications under the California Department of Conservation categories, the underlying soil types in many areas of the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) and surrounding areas have the characteristics of prime agricultural soil, according to the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service. However, this excludes the 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-9 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Project Site property affected by the 1926 fire and the consequently contaminated areas (FEIR 2003). Within the City’s AASP planning area, the California Department of Conservation Important Farmlands Map shows that the majority of this area (858 acres, or 61 percent) is comprised of lands with little or no agricultural value (i.e., designated by the state for Urban/Built-up or Other). This area has relatively limited amounts of Prime Farmland (65 acres, or five percent) and Farmland of Local Importance (40 acres, or three percent), and no lands designated for Farmlands of Statewide Importance or Unique Farmland. Approximately eight percent of the area is Farmland of Local Potential, a category with lower agricultural value (FEIR 2003). The City’s Margarita Area Specific Plan was adopted in 2004 and provides a comprehensive land use program for the area bounded by South Higuera Street, Broad Street, Tank Farm Road, and the ridge of the South Street Hills. This area is adjacent to the northern boundary of the Project Site. As shown in Figure 4.15-4, the Margarita Area Specific Plan identifies the properties immediately adjacent to the northern boundary of the Project Site with the following land uses: Open Space, Business Park, Greenway, and Sports Fields (City 2010a). Figure 4.15-4 City’s Margarita Area Specific Plan Source: City 2010a 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.15.2 Regulatory Setting The Project Site is currently within an unincorporated area of the County and, as such, is currently subject to applicable County planning documents, including the County General Plan and the County Airport Land Use Plan. If the Project Site were annexed into the City, the City’s General Plan and AASP would be the applicable plans. Therefore, each of these plans is discussed. 4.15.2.1 State Policies and Regulations California Land Conservation Act of 1965 The California Land Conservation Act of 1965, also known as the Williamson Act, encourages and enables local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners to restrict specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. In return, landowners receive property tax assessments that are much lower than normal because they are based on farming uses rather than full market value. Local governments receive a subsidy for forgone property tax revenues from the state via the Open Space Subvention Act of 1971. 4.15.2.2 Local Policies and Regulations County General Plan Agriculture Element While cattle grazing occurs on portions of the larger Project Site, the General Plan identifies the southerly tip of the Project Site (14 acres) with an Agriculture land use designation. The Agriculture Element establishes goals aimed at supporting, conserving and protecting agricultural production and resources. Appendix E, Policy Consistency Analysis, discusses the Project’s consistency with the applicable goals and policies of the Agriculture Element. The following Agriculture Element policies may apply to the Project Site (SLOC 2010e): AGP3: Right-to-Farm Ordinance a. Re-affirm the County’s Right-to-Farm Ordinance, Title 5 of the County Code, as an effective means to let the public know that the use of real property for agricultural operations is a high priority and favored use. The Right-to-Farm Ordinance requires disclosure statements between sellers and buyers of properties at the time of property transfer and through inclusion of disclosure statements on all discretionary land use permit applications administered by the County Department of Planning and Building. b. Encourage the County Agriculture Department to: (1) maintain an outreach information program to make the local real estate industry and the public aware of the Right-to-Farm Ordinance and the disclosure provisions on property transactions, and (2) continue mediating issues relating to the Right-to-Farm Ordinance. AGP9: Soil Conservation a. Encourage landowners to participate in programs that reduce soil erosion and increase soil productivity. Promote coordination between the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Resource Conservation Districts, Consolidated Farm Services Agency, Morro Bay State and National Estuary, and other agencies and organizations. 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-11 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR b. Emphasize the long-range benefits of proper drainage control and tillage, cropping, soil amendment, and grazing techniques to minimize soil erosion. c. Assure that roads and drainage systems on County-controlled properties and facilities do not negatively impact agricultural lands and that the roads and systems are properly maintained. AGP10: Water Conservation a. Encourage water conservation through feasible and appropriate “best management practices.” Emphasize efficient water application techniques; the use of properly designed irrigation systems; and the control of runoff from croplands, rangelands, and agricultural roads. b. Encourage the U.C. Cooperative Extension to continue its public information and research program describing water conservation techniques that may be appropriate for agricultural practices in this County. Encourage landowners to participate in programs that conserve water. AGP11: Agricultural Water Supplies a. Maintain water resources for production agriculture, both in quality and quantity, so as to prevent the loss of agriculture due to competition for water with urban and suburban development. b. Do not approve proposed general plan amendments or rezonings that result in increased residential density or urban expansion if the subsequent development would adversely affect: 1) water supplies and quality, or (2) groundwater recharge capability needed for agricultural use. c. Do not approve facilities to move groundwater from areas of overdraft to any other area, as determined by the Resource Management System in the Land Use Element. AGP12: Pest, Vertebrate, and Weed Management a. Assure that pests, such as squirrels and noxious weeds, are managed on County owned properties so as to avoid impacts on agriculture. b. Encourage the use of integrated pest management techniques to manage pests, vertebrates, and weeds on both public and private lands. c. Support and promote programs that help landowners learn pest control methods, utilizing the expertise of the U.C. Cooperative Extension and the County Agriculture Department. AGP13: Agricultural Material Composting a. Encourage the composting and re-use of agricultural commodities and materials. b. The County should carefully evaluate and work cooperatively with appropriate state and federal agencies, local organizations and land owners to determine whether and under what circumstances bio-solids are appropriate for land disposal. AGP14: Agricultural Preserve Program a. Encourage eligible property owners to participate in the County’s agricultural preserve program. AGP17: Agricultural Buffers a. Protect land designated Agriculture and other lands in production agriculture by using natural or man-made buffers where adjacent to non-agricultural land uses in accordance with the agricultural buffer policies adopted by the Board of Supervisor. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR AGP18: Location of Improvements a. Locate new buildings, access roads, and structures so as to protect agricultural land. AGP20: Agricultural Land Divisions a. Where a division of agricultural lands is proposed, a contiguous cluster division consistent with AGP 22 or 23 is an alternative to a conventional “lot split” land division. b. Where a land division is proposed, the proposed parcels should be designed to ensure the long term protection of agricultural resources. AGP24: Conversion of Agricultural Land a. Discourage the conversion of agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses through the following actions: 1. Work in cooperation with the incorporated cities, service districts, school districts, the County Department of Agriculture, the Agricultural Liaison Advisory Board, Farm Bureau, and affected community advisory groups to establish urban service and urban reserve lines and village reserve lines that will protect agricultural land and will stabilize agriculture at the urban fringe. 2. Establish clear criteria in this plan and the Land Use Element for changing the designation of land from Agriculture to non-agricultural designations. 3. Avoid land redesignation (rezoning) that would create new rural residential development outside the urban and village reserve lines. 4. Avoid locating new public facilities outside urban and village reserve lines unless they serve a rural function or there is no feasible alternative location within the urban and village reserve lines. AGP25: Unique or Sensitive Habitat a. Encourage private landowners to protect and preserve unique or sensitive habitat. b. For new development requiring a discretionary permit and for proposed land divisions, protect unique or sensitive habitat affected by the proposal through the following measures: 1. Site the proposed development so as to avoid significant impacts on the habitat or significant impacts on the agricultural operations. Provide for adjustments in Project design where alternatives are infeasible, more environmentally damaging, or have a significant negative impact on agriculture. 2. When significant impacts are identified, the landowner shall implement county-approved mitigation measures consistent with the existing requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). AGP31: Recreational Use of Agricultural Lands a. Encourage recreational uses on privately-owned lands on a case-by-case basis where such uses are compatible with on- and off-site agriculture and with scenic and environmentally sensitive resources. County General Plan Land Use Element The Inland Framework for Planning section of the Land Use Element provides the goals, principles and policies identified below that are related to agriculture (SLOC 2010f). Appendix 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-13 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR E, Policy Consistency Analysis, discusses the Project’s consistency with the applicable goals, principles and policies of the Land Use Element related to agriculture. Goal 3: To support preservation of the County’s agricultural industry and the soils essential to agriculture. Goal 5: To provide areas where agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial uses may be developed in harmonious patters and with all the necessities for satisfactory living and working environments. Principle 1: Preserve open space, scenic natural beauty and natural resources. Conserve energy resources. Protect agricultural land and resources. Policy 6: Encourage the protection and use of agricultural land for the production of food, fiber and other agricultural commodities, and support the rural economy and locally-based commercial agriculture. Principle 2: Strengthen and direct development toward existing and strategically planned communities. Policy 1: Maintain rural areas in agriculture, low-intensity recreation, very low-density residential uses, and open space uses that preserve and enhance a well-defined rural character. County General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element The Soil Resources chapter of the Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) provides the goals and policies identified below that are related to agriculture (SLOC 2010g). Appendix E, Policy Consistency Analysis, discusses the Project’s consistency with the applicable goals and policies of the COSE related to agriculture. Goal SL1: Soils will be protected from wind and water erosion, particularly that caused by poor soil management practices. Policy SL 1.1: Prevent loss of topsoil in all land uses. Policy SL 1.2: Promote soil conservation practices in all land uses. Policy SL 1.3: Minimize erosion associated with new development. Goal SL3: Important Agricultural Soils will be conserved. Policy SL 3.1: Conserve important agricultural soils. County of San Luis Obispo Area Plan The Project Site falls within the San Luis Obispo Area Plan, which is a component of the Land Use Element. A small southern portion of the Project Site lies outside the Urban Reserve Line and has an Agriculture land use classification. This same portion of land lies within the Greenbelt Area as identified in the San Luis Obispo Area Plan and is considered a rural land use area. The Greenbelt Area is a voluntary and innovative method designed to preserve agricultural and open space uses (SLOC 2010c). 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR San Luis Obispo County “Right-to-Farm” Ordinance The San Luis Obispo County “Right-to-Farm” Ordinance states that the use of real property for agricultural operations is a high priority and favored use. Ordinance No. 2561 (August, 1992), added Chapter 5.16 to Title 5 of the San Luis Obispo County Code relating to Agricultural Lands, Operations, and The Right To Farm. Paragraph “b” of Section 5.16.020 (Findings and Policy) states: Where non-agricultural land uses occur near agricultural areas, agricultural operations frequently become the subjects of nuisance complaints due to lack of information about such operations. As a result, agricultural operators may be forced to cease or curtail their operations. Such actions discourage investments in farm improvements to the detriment of agricultural uses and the viability of the County’s agricultural industry as a whole. It is the purpose and intent of this ordinance to reduce the loss to the County of its agricultural resources by clarifying the circumstances under which agricultural operations may be considered a nuisance.” An additional purpose of this ordinance (Paragraph “c”) is to promote a good neighbor policy by advising purchasers of residential property, and owners of other property in the County, of the inherent potential problems associated with the purchase of such property. Such concerns may include, but are not limited to, the noises, odors, dust, chemicals, smoke, and hours of operation that may accompany agricultural operations. It is intended that, through mandatory disclosures, purchasers and users will better understand the impact of living near agricultural operations and be prepared to accept attendant conditions as the natural result of living in or near rural areas. Pre-existing agricultural uses are not a nuisance (Section 5.16.030). California Civil Code Section 3479 defines a “nuisance” as anything which is injurious to health, is indecent or offensive to the senses, or is an obstruction to the use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. The County has determined that the use of real property for agricultural operations is a high priority and favored use to the County, and those inconveniences or discomforts arising from legally established agricultural activities or operations, as defined in the San Luis Obispo County Code, or state law, shall not be or become a nuisance. Therefore, the Project is, and will continue to be, subject to those inconveniences or discomforts arising from adjacent and surrounding agricultural operations, which, if conducted in a manner consistent with state law and County code, shall not be or become a nuisance. County Title 22, Land Use Ordinance The County’s Land Use Ordinance is its zoning ordinance. It implements the policies of the General Plan, identifying allowable uses within each land use category and site planning, project design standards, and review procedures. Applicable agricultural regulations in the Land Use Ordinance are identified in Section 22.06.030 Allowable Land Uses and Permit Requirements, Section 22.30.070 Agricultural Processing Uses, and Section 22.108.040 Rural Area Standards 2010b). County Regional Airport Land Use Plan The County Regional Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) identifies areas of significant aviation hazard by delineating certain safety areas. Safety Area S-1 constitutes the area within the vicinity 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-15 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR which aircraft operate frequently or operate in conditions of reduced visibility at altitudes less than or equal to 500 feet above ground level. The Project Site lies within the Safety Area S-1. The portion of the Project Site with a County agriculture land use designation falls within Safety Area S-1b and Safety Area S-1c, both of which are sub-areas of Safety Area S-1. Further, this portion of County agriculture-designated land may meet the definition of Reserve Space, which includes size, distribution, topography, obstruction, and agricultural criteria, such as allowing the grazing of cattle, sheep and goats, and ensuring the area is substantially free of structures (SLOC 2010d). The County Regional ALUP identifies land use policies intended to ensure consistency with local actions, such as development proposals, building regulation modifications, and adoption or amendments to zoning ordinances, general plans and specific plans. Appendix E, Policy Consistency Analysis, discusses the Project’s consistency with the applicable policies of the ALUP related to agriculture. The above projects and actions would be considered inconsistent with the County Regional ALUP if the following policies related to agriculture were not adhered to: Policy G-3: Except as provided in Policy G-4, a proposed project or local action will be determined to be inconsistent with the Airport Land Use Plan if the proposal is not in conformance with all applicable Specific Land Use Policies. In the event that the site affected by a proposed project or local action is located in more than one noise exposure area or aviation safety area, the standards for each such area will be applied separately to the land area lying within each noise or safety zone. Policy G-4: When the site affected by a proposed project or local action is located in more than one noise exposure area or aviation safety area, the Airport Land Use Commission may, at its sole discretion, elect not to apply the requirements of Policy G-3 if: i. the total gross area(s) within the more restrictive area(s) is 2 acres or less; and ii. the land area(s) within the more restrictive area(s) is less than 50 percent of the total gross land area affected by the referred project or local action In such instance, the Airport Land Use Commission may elect to apply the policies applicable to the least restrictive noise and/or safety zone to the entire site affected by the project or local action. The Airport Land Use Commission must adopt specific findings that the proposed project or local action, so considered, would not result in the potential development of land uses incompatible with current or future airport operations. Policy S-2: The proposed project or local action would permit or fail to adequately prohibit any future residential or nonresidential development or redevelopment which would create, within the site to be developed or redeveloped, a density greater than specified in Table 7 or any mixed- use development or redevelopment which would create, within the site to be developed or redeveloped, densities greater than illustrated in Figures 5 through 8. Policy S-3: The proposed project or local action would permit or fail to adequately prohibit any future development project which specifies, entails, or would result in a greater building coverage than permitted by Table 7. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Policy O-1: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Airport Land Use Plan, any proposed general plan, general plan amendment, specific plan, specific plan amendment, zoning ordinance, zoning ordinance amendment, building regulation modification, or individual development proposal will be determined to be inconsistent with the Airport Land Use Plan if the proposed local action lacks sufficient provisions to ensure that both of the following provisions will be carried out: iii. aviation easements will be recorded for each property developed within the area included in the proposed local action prior to the issuance of any building permit or conditional use permit; and iv. all owners, potential purchasers, occupants (whether as owners or renters), and potential occupants (whether as owners or renters) will receive full and accurate disclosure concerning the noise, safety, or overflight impacts associated with airport operations prior to entering any contractual obligation to purchase, lease, rent, or otherwise occupy any property or properties within the airport area. City General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element The overarching goal of the Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) is to protect resources, including agricultural lands, and accommodate passive recreation without interfering with agricultural operations. This element uses the term ‘open space’ broadly to include ranges, farmland and lands having prime agricultural soils. As shown in the General Plan Land Use Element map, the majority of the Project Site has an Open Space land use designation (City 2010b). Appendix E, Policy Consistency Analysis, discusses the Project’s consistency with the applicable policies and programs of the COSE related to agriculture. The following COSE policies and programs may apply to the Project Site: Policy 6.3.1, Old Mineral-Extraction Sites: The City will implement the following policies and will encourage other agencies with jurisdiction to do so: a. Land use designations for old mineral-extraction sites shall reflect risks associated with them, and should generally be limited to “Open Space”, “Agriculture”, or “Park” designations on the Land Use Element map. b. Previously active mineral-extraction sites should be secured and reclaimed in conjunction with any development approvals for the land on which they are located. Securing them means preventing access that entails unacceptable risk. Reclamation means re-establishing ground contours and vegetation to the extent feasible, use of erosion control measures to enhance and protect soil stability, water and air quality, wildlife habitat values and views. Policy 6.5.1, Potential Mineral-Extraction Sites: On-site with mineral-extraction potential, the City will: a. Prohibit mineral extraction within the City limits. b. Prohibit mineral extraction and surface entry for extraction of oil or gas within open space owned by the City in fee or as an easement. c. Encourage other agencies with jurisdiction to permit mineral extraction only if significant impacts to human health and the environment will be avoided and site restoration will be 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-17 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR assured. Impacts to be addressed include air and water quality, noise, habitat disruption, aesthetics, and geologic stability. All phases of the activity, including site access, must be addressed. Policy 7.5.5, Soil Conservation and Landform Modification: Public and private development projects shall be designed to prevent soil erosion, minimize landform modifications to avoid habitat disturbance and conserve and reuse on-site soils. Policy 7.6.1, Environmental Toxins: The City will avoid the use of synthetic organic chemicals unless there is no practical alternative, and support the use of integrated pest management techniques. When the use of a synthetic organic chemical cannot be avoided, the material shall be selective (its effect limited to the target species so far as possible), and it shall be applied selectively. Program 7.7.6, Replace Invasive, Non-native Vegetation with Native Vegetation: The City and private development will protect and enhance habitat by removing invasive, non-native vegetation that detracts from habitat values and by replanting it with native California plant species. The Natural Resources Manager will prioritize projects and enlist the help of properly trained volunteers to assist in non-native vegetation removal and replanting when appropriate. Policy 8.2.1, Open Space Preserved: The City will preserve as open space or agriculture the undeveloped and agricultural land outside the urban reserve line, including the designated Greenbelt as shown in Figure 5, and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to do likewise. Policy 8.3.1, Open Space within the Urban Area: The City will preserve the areas listed in Goal 8.22, and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to do likewise. The City will designate these areas as Open Space or Agriculture in the General Plan. Policy 8.3.2, Open Space Buffers: When activities close to open space resources within or outside the urban area could harm them, the City will require buffers between the activities and the resources. The City will actively encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to follow this policy. Buffers associated with new development shall be on the site of the development, rather than on neighboring land containing the open space resource. Buffers provide distance in the form of setbacks, within which certain features or activities are not allowed or conditionally allowed. Buffers shall also use techniques such as planting and wildlife- compatible fencing. Buffers shall be adequate for the most sensitive species in the protected area, as determined by a qualified professional and shall complement the protected area’s habitat values. Buffers shall be required in the following situations: a. Between urban development—including parks and public facilities—and natural habitats such as creeks, wetlands, hillsides and ridgelines, Morros, scenic rock outcrops and other significant geological features, and grassland communities, to address noise, lighting, storm runoff, spread of invasive, nonnative species, and access by people and pets (see also the Safety Element for “defensible space” next to wildland fire areas). b. Between urban development and agricultural operations, to address dust, noise, odors, chemical use, and access by people and pets. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR c. Between agricultural operations and natural habitat, to address noise, chemical use, sediment transport, and livestock access. d. Between new development and cultural resources, to address visual compatibility and access by people. e. Between new development and scenic resources or the greenbelt, to address view blockage, lighting and noise, and visual transition from urban character to rural character. f. Urban development or uses located adjacent to the Urban Reserve Line (URL) to provide a transition to open space or greenbelt areas. Transition areas should add to the preservation of open space lands or resources. At a minimum, a 50 foot transition area (preserved in essentially a natural state) shall be provided within the Project along the Project boundary with the URL, unless the transition area is defined elsewhere in this Element. Policy 8.4.1, Open Space for Safety: The City will preserve as Open Space, or as Agriculture, the areas listed in Goal 8.23 and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to do likewise (See also the Safety Element). Policy 8.5.1, Public Access: Public access to open space resources, with interpretive information, should be provided when doing so is consistent with protection of the resources, and with the security and privacy of affected landowners and occupants. Access will generally be limited to non-vehicular movement, and may be visually or physically restricted in sensitive areas. Public access to or through production agricultural land, or through developed residential lots, will be considered only if the owner agrees (Land for active recreation is typically designated “Park” in the General Plan Land Use Map). The City shall also designate open space areas that are not intended for human presence or activity. Policy 8.5.3, Open Space Enhancement and Restoration: The City will enhance and restore open space resources identified in Goals 8.21, 8.22, and 8.23, and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to do likewise. Policy 8.6.1, Loss of Open Space: The City may permit loss of an open space resource, as described in Goals 8.21 and 8.22, only when: a. Preserving the resource would permanently deprive the landowner of all reasonable use, and acquisition by the City or a conservation organization is not feasible, or b. There is a demonstrated need, based on public health, safety, or welfare, and there is no practical alternative to loss of the resource, or c. The resource is on a small parcel essentially surrounded by urban development, and the development contributes to the protection of agricultural land in the urban reserve or greenbelt through transfer of development credit, dedication of open space easements or fee ownership, direct funding for open space acquisition or another equally effective method, as further described in the Land Use Element. Policy 8.6.2, Extent of Open Space Loss: The extent of loss or degree of harm to the resource shall be minimized, consistent with the justifications for any loss provided above. Where creeks 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-19 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR must be modified for flood protection or bank stability, the modification shall be patterned after natural conditions to the maximum extent feasible. Policy 8.6.3, Required Mitigation: Loss or harm shall be mitigated to the maximum extent feasible. Mitigation must at least comply with federal and state requirements. Mitigation shall be implemented and monitored in compliance with state and federal requirements, by qualified professionals, and shall be funded by the Project Applicant. a. For a widespread habitat type or for farmland, mitigation shall consist of permanently protecting an equal area of equal quality, which does not already have permanent protection, within the San Luis Obispo Planning Area. b. Any development that is allowed on a site designated as Open Space or Agriculture, or containing open-space resources, shall be designed to minimize its impacts on open space values on the site and on neighboring land. 1. Hillside development shall comply with the standards of the Land Use Element, including minimization of grading for structures and access, and use of building forms, colors, and landscaping that are not visually intrusive. (See also Chapter 9.21.1) 2. Creek corridors, wetlands, grassland communities, other valuable habitat areas, archaeological resources, agricultural land, and necessary buffers should be within their own parcel, rather than divided among newly created parcels (Figure 8). Where creation of a separate parcel is not practical, the resources shall be within an easement. The easement must clearly establish allowed uses and maintenance responsibilities in furtherance of resource protection. 3. The City will encourage the County not to create new parcels within the greenbelt, with the exception of those permitted under the County’s agriculture cluster incentive. Outside of cluster districts, allowed parcel sizes within the greenbelt should be no smaller, and the number of dwellings allowed on a parcel should be no greater than as designated in the September 2002 San Luis Obispo Area Plan and related County codes. Program 8.7.1, Protect Open Space Resources: The City will take the following actions to protect open space, and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to take the same actions within their areas of responsibility and jurisdiction: a. Maintain the urban reserve line location, except where a relatively small enlargement of the urban area is tied to permanent protection of substantial open land that did not previously have assured protection. b. Promote open space protection by annexing and applying Conservation and Open Space C/OS) and Agriculture zoning to private property where appropriate and consistent with General Plan goals and policies. c. Set conditions of subdivision and development approvals consistent with General Plan goals and policies. d. Acquire land or interests in land for open space, pursuant to City Open Space Guidelines and acquisition priorities. (See also Appendix B, “Acquisition of Open Space.”) 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 1. Obtain dedications of fee ownership or easements as gifts or in exchange for development approvals. 2. Seek and use grants, donations, other revenue sources, and long-term financing mechanisms to purchase fee ownership or easements. The City will maintain annual funding for open space acquisition and protection, and will explore all potential funding sources and other creative incentive programs, including general obligation bonds, sales tax increase, property transfer tax, assessment districts, tax incentives, and state and federal loans and grants. 3. Advocate Countywide planning and funding for open space protection. e. Manage its open space holdings and enforce its open space easements, consistent with General Plan goals and policies and the Open Space Ordinance. (See also Appendix C, Management of Open Space”) f. Encourage transfer of development credit from open lands to lands designated for development, or retirement of development credit. g. Locate, design and operate facilities consistent with General Plan goals and policies. h. Encourage sustainable agricultural practices to protect the health of human and natural communities, and to minimize conflicts between agriculture and urban neighbors, avoid grading adjacent to or within creeks and wetlands and limit livestock access within creeks and wetlands. i. Provide information for citizens and in particular, landowners, on the values and techniques for resource protection and land conservation. j. Improve interagency cooperation for open space acquisition, greenbelt, creeks, wetlands, and wildlife habitat protection in open space areas by coordinating with other government agencies and organizations having interest or expertise in resource protection. k. Avoid imposing taxes or fees that discourage retention of open space or agricultural uses. l. Establish mutually respectful, long-term relationships with landowners, and conservation organizations such as land trusts, and local environmental organizations. m. Maintain the position of Natural Resources Manager so that open space functions are consolidated in one existing City department under one person. n. The Natural Resource Manager will establish and periodically review performance standards and dimensions for buffers between open space or agricultural resources and urban uses. Program 8.7.2, Enhance and Restore Open Space: The City will do the following in support of open space enhancement and restoration, in coordination with other agencies and organizations, and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to take the same actions within their areas of responsibility: a. Inventory natural areas that have been degraded, beginning with City-owned property, and prepare a list of sites and activities, in priority order, for restoration efforts. b. Establish self-sustaining populations of native species that were historically found in natural habitat areas. 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-21 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 1. Revegetate disturbed and over-grazed upland areas, including grassland communities, using site-specific or region-specific plants so far as practical. 2. To reverse historical trends of creek channelization and modification, re-establish native riparian vegetation. 3. Eliminate sources of water pollutants and improper water diversions. c. Remove invasive, non-native species in natural habitat areas, and prevent the introduction or spread of invasive, non-native species and pathogens. d. Where allowed by City ownership, easements, or other agreements, remove man-made elements such as buildings, paving, concrete lining of waterways, signs, and utilities, when they are contrary to the purpose for the open space and they are not needed for public health or safety, or for implementation of City plans. e. Provide and maintain suitably-sized access corridors through or under new and previously established, man-made obstacles to wildlife movement (such as appropriately sized culverts under arterial streets, highways and other major roads). f. Remove trash, debris, and contaminants, using methods that minimally disrupt the open- space resources. g. Provide continuing community education and outreach for all citizens, youth and youth groups, and property owners on open space and natural resource values, programs and responsibilities. h. Enlist the help of volunteers and academic programs in restoring and monitoring habitat health. i. Set conditions of subdivision and development approvals consistent with General Plan goals and policies. (See also Chapter 8.25.1) j. Following adequate public review, adopt conservation plans for open space areas under City easement or fee ownership. The plans shall include a resource inventory, needs analysis, acceptable levels of change, grazing, monitoring, wildlife (including listed species, sensitive species, and species of local concern, management and implementation strategies, including wildfire preparedness plans. k. Identify and secure alternative funding mechanisms for re-planting degraded creek corridor sections with native California vegetation. Policy 9.1.1, Preserve Natural and Agricultural Landscapes: The City will implement the following policies and will encourage other agencies with jurisdiction to do likewise: a. Natural and agricultural landscapes that the City has not designated for urban use shall be maintained in their current patterns of use. b. Any development that is permitted in natural or agricultural landscapes shall be visually subordinate to and compatible with the landscape features. Development includes, but is not limited to buildings, signs (including billboard signs), roads, utility and telecommunication lines and structures. Such development shall: 1. Avoid visually prominent locations such as ridgelines, and slopes exceeding 20 percent. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 2. Avoid unnecessary grading, vegetation removal, and site lighting. 3. Incorporate building forms, architectural materials, and landscaping, that respect the setting, including the historical pattern of development in similar settings, and avoid stark contrasts with its setting. 4. Preserve scenic or unique landforms, significant trees in terms of size, age, species or rarity, and rock outcroppings. Policy 10.1.2, Competition for Supplies: The City will consider the effects of water supply projects on agriculture, wildlife habitat and stream flows, and should ensure continued water availability for these uses in planning for long-term water supplies. The City will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to follow this policy. City Title 17, Zoning Ordinance The City’s Zoning Ordinance implements the zoning and land use policies of the General Plan, identifying allowable uses within each land use category and site planning, project design standards and review procedures. Applicable agricultural regulations in the Zoning Ordinance are identified in Section 17.33 Agriculture (AG) Zone. This section states the purpose of the AG zone is intended to encourage conservation of agricultural lands and continuation of agricultural uses and keeping of livestock where compatible with urban development. It also states that the AG zone will be applied to areas designated on the general plan map as “conservation open space” and “interim open space” where there has been a history of agricultural cultivation and keeping of livestock (City 2010c). City Airport Area Specific Plan The City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) provides a comprehensive land use program intended to guide future growth and development of the planning area, which is approximately 1,500 acres of unincorporated land along the City’s southern boundary. The Project Site rests at the heart of the planning area (City 2010d). The following AASP policies and programs may apply to the Project Site: Policy 3.2.4, Wetlands and Buffer Areas: Designate for open space use wetlands and their associated buffer areas. Policy 3.2.5, Restoring Marginal or Degraded Wetlands: When reviewing plans to restore marginal or degraded wetlands, require: (1) techniques for isolation, stabilizing, or removing petroleum contamination of soil and groundwater that minimize disturbance of existing wetland and other surface resource values; (2) configuration of the ground surface to retain wetland characteristics; (3) removal of invasive, non-native plants; (4) introduction of native plants; (5) methods approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the City Fire Department; and (6) will not create a significant attraction for large birds in consideration of airport safety. Policy 3.2.6, Expansion of Wetlands: Where suitable buffers can be provided, expand wetlands into areas within the wetlands complex that are conducive to wetlands, but that do not initially meet the definition of wetlands. Policy 3.2.7, Mitigation of Wetland Losses: Utilize suitable portions of the Unocal property for on-site mitigation of wetland losses on the Unocal property and, if agreed to by the property 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-23 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR owner, off-site mitigation of wetland losses associated with development elsewhere in the Airport Area and Margarita Area. Policy 3.2.8, Professional Direction of Wetland Work: Assure that all wetlands restoration, enhancement, and creation will be under the direction of qualified professionals. Seek the cooperation of trustee agencies, such as the California Department of Fish and Game, and obtain any necessary approvals from these agencies. Policy 3.2.9, Design of Detention Areas: Design on-site drainage detention areas within the Airport Area to support wetlands characteristics, so they will be visually attractive elements of the landscape and components in a system of wildlife habitat, in addition to flood control facilities. Policy 3.2.10, Recreational Use of Wetlands Complex: Recreational use of the wetlands complex and buffer areas should be limited to non-intrusive observation and study. The type and extent of public access should be restricted in order to maintain high-quality wildlife habitat. Policy 3.2.13, Native Bunchgrass: Preserve the native bunchgrass area on the northeast corner of the Unocal property, with an appropriate open space buffer. Policy 3.2.14, Unocal Property Open Space Lands: Designate open space lands on the Unocal property as a permanent ecological preserve dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of the area’s natural resources, and public environmental education. Policy 3.2.15, Continuous Open Space Corridors: Provide continuous open space corridors linking open space resources within the Airport Area to resources outside the Airport Area. Policy 3.2.16, Continuous Wetlands: Development in the Airport Area should not isolate or further fragment wetlands, uplands or their associated habitat areas. Policy 3.2.17, Interrupt Flow of Contaminants: At every opportunity, interrupt the pathways that allow petroleum contamination to enter the biological food chain. Techniques used to interrupt the flow of contaminants should be those that are least disruptive to habitat at the ground and water surface. Policy 3.2.18, Mitigate Loss of Ag and Open Space Land: To mitigate the loss of agricultural and open land in the Airport Area, development shall help protect agricultural and open space lands to the south and east by securing protected areas at least equal to the area of new development, where on-site protection is not available. Policy 3.2.19, Protection for On-Site Resources: Airport Area properties shall secure protection for any on-site resources identified in the General Plan. These properties, to help maintain the greenbelt, shall also secure open space protection for any contiguous, commonly owned land outside the urban reserve. If it is not feasible to directly obtain protection for such land, fees in lieu of dedication shall be paid when the property is developed, to help secure the greenbelt in the area south of the City’s southerly urban reserve line. In lieu of off-site open space protection, the Unocal Tank Farm Site shall preserve the open space resources that occupy the majority of the site and provide long-term maintenance and enhancement of these resources. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Policy 3.2.23, Designation of Contaminated Land: Designate as open space undeveloped, contaminated land that has significant open space values. Policy 3.2.24, City Consideration of “Changed Conditions” on the Unocal Property: It is acknowledged that Unocal is preparing, or will be preparing, a remediation plan for the Unocal property addressing the contaminated areas on the site. If, in the course of the review and approval process for such remediation, it is determined by the regulating agencies (Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, Regional Water Quality Control Board) that: 1. Physical remediation that will destroy the site as a wetland is necessary; and 2. Mitigation for such destruction is permitted to be mitigated off-site, or in another location on the Unocal property, Such that the wetland and associated upland buffer values no longer exist, then the City may consider proposals for changes to the Specific Plan allowing uses of the remediated site which are other than open space. Changes proposed to the Specific Plan shall be referred to the Airport Land Use Commission and shall be consistent with the Cluster Development Zone requirements of the Airport Land Use Plan (See Airport Area Specific Plan Policy 4.5.1). Program 3.3.5, Establish Mitigation Bank: The City will work with the California Department of Fish and Game, responsible federal officials, and administration of the County Airport, to establish a “mitigation bank” within the Unocal property to serve the mitigation needs of the Airport and Margarita Areas, consistent with the operating needs of the County Airport. Program 3.3.6, Public Access (Unocal Property): The City will work with the property owner and local conservation organizations to ensure that public access to the Unocal property is limited to levels compatible with maintaining habitat values in the area. Program 3.3.8, Open Space Connections: The City will ensure that development north and east of the Unocal property remains an open space corridor connection to the Margarita Area’s athletic fields and Acacia Creek, and on to the South Street Hills. This corridor may include recreational facilities but will be designed to allow movement of wildlife through it. Program 3.3.15, Urban Reserve Expansion: Any projects involving minor expansions of the urban reserve shall secure open space or agricultural land adjoining but outside the new urban reserve line location. The open space or agricultural land secured shall be large enough to effectively discourage additional urban development beyond the urban reserve line. It shall be secured by easement or fee ownership by the City or a qualified land conservation organization. Program 3.3.18, Expanding Wetlands: Expand the existing major wetland north to Tank Farm Road to the northwest and provide a suitable upland edge, in conjunction with redevelopment of the part of the Unocal property that contained company offices. 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-25 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.15.3 Significance Criteria According to Appendix G of the CEQA guidelines, a project would have a significant adverse environmental impact on agricultural resources if it would: i. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance Farmland) to nonagricultural use, as shown on the maps prepared under the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency; ii. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract; iii. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to nonagricultural use; iv. Be potentially inconsistent with County and City agricultural policies. 4.15.4 Impact Methodology The methodologies for analyzing the Project’s potential impacts to agriculture are based on the guidelines, policies, and procedures identified in the City and County General Plans, the County Regional Airport Land Use Plan, the City AASP, the Guide to Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), and the California Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model LESA), and consultation with the County Department of Agriculture. The California Department of Conservation and the County Department of Planning and Building’s websites were accessed to obtain GIS mapping and metadata information related to the Project. The following methods may determine the extent and/or significance of the Project’s impact on agricultural resources: Identify on-site soils that would be impacted based on their NRCS designation of Prime Farmland. The NRCS defines Prime Farmland soils as land with the best combination of physical and chemical features able to sustain long-term production of agricultural crops. Using this method, approximately 20 acres of the Project Site would be impacted (see Table 4.15-1 and Figure 4.15-2). Identify on-site soils that would be impacted based on their Storie Rating. Storie Ratings of one, two, and three represent soils with excellent, good, and fair qualities for agricultural production. Using this method, approximately 20 acres of the Project Site would be impacted see Table 4.15-1 and Figure 4.15-3). Identify any on-site land classified by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program with an agricultural designation that would be directly converted as a result of the proposed development and/or use. Using this method, approximately 20 acres of the Project Site would be impacted (see Table 4.15-1. Identify on-site and off-site areas with a County agriculture land use designation that would be directly converted or would indirectly contribute to the conversion of land as a result of the proposed development and/or uses. Using this method, approximately 14 acres of 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR agricultural land would be impacted. This potentially impacted land is located at the southerly tip of the Project Site (see Figure 2-21). The California Agriculture LESA Model developed by the Department of Conservation provides a method for quantifying potential impacts on agricultural resources by allowing the relative quality of land resources to be rated based on specific measurable features. The LESA Model is composed of six different factors that are separately weighted relative to one another and then combined resulting in a single numeric score that becomes the basis for determining a project’s potential impact significance. Two of the factors are based on soil resource quality and four factors are based on a project’s size, water resource availability, surrounding agricultural lands, and surrounding protected resource lands (CDC 1997). The following section discusses the impacts of the Project on agricultural resources. Impact discussions are provided for remediation/restoration, the City Development Plan, and the County Development Plan. Discussion of potential inconsistencies with applicable County and City agricultural policies are provided in Appendix E – Preliminary Policy Consistency Analysis. 4.15.5 Remediation Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AR.1 The remediation and restoration activities would result in the conversion of farmland or grazing land to non-agricultural uses. Remediation Class III Historically, the Project Site has not been used for agricultural purposes, but rather has been used primarily as an oil storage terminal to serve as the accumulation point for the petroleum pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. The terminal was built in 1910 and continued to operate at various levels until the late 1990s when it was formally decommissioned. After the decommissioning, the site has been used for cattle grazing as a method for weed control. This has been the only form of agricultural use at the site for the past 100 years. As previously stated, the FMMP designates farmland by soil type and existing land use. As detailed in Table 4.15-1 and Figure 4.15-2, the majority of land within the Project Site approximately 307 acres or 94 percent) is designated by the FMMP as Other Land or Not Prime Farmland by the NRCS. Approximately 20 acres (6 percent) is designated as Prime Farmland by the FMMP and is broken down further by NRCS classifications as follows: 13 acres (4 percent) is designated Prime Farmland If Irrigated and approximately 7 acres (2 percent) is designated Prime Farmland If Irrigated and Drained. However, the portion of the Prime Farmland If Irrigated and Drained that lies within the Northwest Operation Area is not feasible or conducive to commercial agricultural production as this area is currently developed with buildings, utilities, and pavement. Figure 4.15-5 shows the Prime Farmland areas and proposed restored wetlands on the Project Site. As previously stated, the FMMP designates farmland by soil type and existing land use. As detailed in Table 4.15-1 and Figure 4.15-2, the majority of land within the Project Site approximately 307 acres or 94 percent) is designated by the FMMP as Other Land or Not Prime 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-27 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Farmland by the NRCS. Approximately 20 acres (6 percent) is designated as Prime Farmland by the FMMP and is broken down further by NRCS classifications as follows: 13 acres (4 percent) is designated Prime Farmland If Irrigated and approximately 7 acres (2 percent) is designated Prime Farmland If Irrigated and Drained. Figure 4.15-5 Project Development on Prime Farmland Source: RAP, AVOCET 2007; MRS The areas of Prime Farmland are located on the western and southerly edges of the Project Site. However, this Farmland is poorly configured for agricultural production. It consists of narrow strips of land that have a maximum width of approximately 200 feet. Approximately 55 percent of the Farmland is less than 100 feet wide. In addition, much of this land is encumbered by existing wetlands (as shown in Figure 4.2-3). Additionally, the portion of the Prime Farmland If Irrigated and Drained that lies within the Northwest Operation Area is not feasible or conducive to commercial agricultural production as this area is currently developed with buildings, utilities, and pavement. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The remediation activities would only affect the Prime Farmland that is located along the western border of the Northwest Operations Area. The Applicant is proposing to construct a remedial soil cap, a minimum of 4 feet in thickness in this area. The cap would provide a barrier between the affected soil and potential receptors. None of the other Prime Farmland on the Project Site would be directly impacted by the remediation activities. A portion of the remedial soil cap would extend off-site on to the adjacent agricultural parcel located just to the west of the Northwest Operations Area. The off-site area that would be capped is approximately 20 feet wide, and approximately 500 feet long running north to south. This adjacent parcel has historically been used for row crops as shown in Figure 4.15-1. Installation of the remedial cap could limit the use of this area for row crops. However, the area is about 0.2 acres and the entire parcel is about 32 acres. This small reduction in available acreage would not affect the viability of this parcel to continue row crop production. As part of the remediation process, restoration activities would occur at various areas around the Project Site. Figure 2-15 shows the conceptual restoration plan for the site and the area where wetland, Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (VPFS) habitat and terrestrial habitat would be restored. About 10 acres of Prime Farmland would be converted to wetlands as part of the restoration process. However, as discussed above, these areas are small narrow strips that are not suitable for sustained agriculture. Therefore, the impacts of the remediation and remediation/restoration project on the conversion of Prime Farmland would be less than significant. During the three years of remediation there would be no cattle grazing at the Project Site due to potential conflicts associated with the cattle and the construction equipment and activities that would be occurring on-site. Once the remediation and restoration project is complete, cattle grazing could return to the site, but would have to be limited to areas outside of the restored wetland, VPFS habitat, and terrestrial areas. Given the biological sensitivity of these areas, it is likely that the Applicant would have to coordinate with the USFWS and CDFW to determine how to manage cattle at the site so they do not impact any of the biologically sensitive restoration areas. With the multitude of site constraints, the historical use of the Project Site, and the limited grassland that is accessible for grazing, the Project Site has only has limited and intermittent grazing for the purpose of fire prevention and weed control since the 1990s. Historically, the Project Site has not been used for continuous cattle grazing for the purpose of raising animals. Given that the Project Site is only used for limited cattle grazing to control weeds, the multitude of site constraints, the historical use of the site, and the limited grassland that is accessible for grazing, the impacts of the remediation and restoration activities on the conversion of grazing land would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts The residual impact would be less than significant (Class III). 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-29 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AR.2 The remediation and restoration activities would potentially conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or with a Williamson Act contract. Remediation Class III As previously stated, the County’s agricultural preserve program identifies areas where the County is willing to enter into a Land Conservation Act (Williamson Act) contract with property owners based on an approved set of criteria. Lands that enter into the County’s agricultural preserve program are subject to zoning restrictions including parcel size restrictions ranging from 40 acres for prime land and 100 acres for nonprime land. Under a Land Conservation Act contract, the property owner agrees not to develop the property for a period of 10 to 20 years in exchange for property tax reductions based on the property’s value as open space or agricultural, rather than developable, land. The Project Site does not fall within a Williamson Act contract, nor do any of the adjacent properties. Therefore, the remediation component of the Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act Contract. The Project Site is not currently zoned agricultural by the City under its AASP; however, the County General Plan identifies the southerly tip of the Project Site (14 acres) with an Agriculture land use designation (see Figure 4.15-5). Although this land has an Agriculture designation, only four acres (approximately) are designated as Prime Farmland with the remainder being Not Prime Farmland, with a portion of the area being wetlands. None of the remediation activities would occur on the area that is currently zoned for agriculture. As shown in Figure 2-15 some of the proposed restoration activities would occur within the area zoned for agriculture. Portions of this area would be converted to wetlands. As discussed above for Impact AG.1, given the multitude of site constraints, the historical use of the Project Site, and the limited grassland that is accessible for grazing, the Project Site has only had limited and intermittent grazing for the purpose of weed control since the 1990s. Historically, the Project Site has not been used for continuous cattle grazing for the purpose of raising animals. Given that the Project Site is only used for limited cattle grazing to control weeds, the multitude of site constraints, the historical use of the site, and the limited grassland that is accessible for grazing, the impacts of the remediation and restoration activities on the agriculturally zoned lands would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts The residual impact would be less than significant (Class III). 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AR.3 The remediation component of the Project would involve other changes in the existing environment, such as deed restrictions and a land use covenant on an adjacent property, which, due to their location or nature, could result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Remediation Class II As shown in Figure 4.15-1 a variety of land uses surround the Project Site. Agricultural uses abut all, or portions of, each of the Project Site’s sides. Much of the area is currently developed as semi-rural areas with a mix of agricultural and grazing land. This open agricultural land is within the Urban Reserve Line of the City. Although past development and current use have resulted in relatively low acreage of farmland classifications under the California Department of Conservation categories, the underlying soil types in many areas of the City’s AASP and surrounding areas have the characteristics of prime agricultural soil, according to the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service. However, this excludes the Project Site which was affected by the 1926 fire and the consequently contaminated areas (FEIR 2003). Northern Properties Properties abutting the northern side of the Project Site comprise of undeveloped land used for grazing. These properties are within the City limits and have either an Open Space or Business Park land use designation. These properties also fall within the City’s Margarita Area Specific Plan, which designates them as Open Space, Business Park, Greenway, or Sports Field land use categories (see Figure 4.15-4). The Project would not preclude the continuation of current grazing activities permitted under the Open Space or Business Park classification. Therefore, the remediation project would not result in the conversion of this adjacent farmland to non- agricultural use. None of the remediation activities would occur in close proximity to this adjacent parcel so dust generation would not be expected to affect the cattle grazing operations. Northwestern Properties The northwestern side of the site abuts 32 acres of level, row crop terrain (north of Tank Farm Road and west of the Project Site) that typically grows bell peppers or tomatoes. Areas containing developed industrial and business parks with light manufacturing, commercial offices, and service uses, abut these 32 acres on three sides. These properties are within the City limits and have a Services & Manufacturing land use designation. The northwestern portion of the Project Site, the Northwest Operations Area, has three buildings, utility lines, a paved parking lot, fencing, and other ancillary facilities, which would not preclude the continuation of current agricultural activities on the adjacent 32 acres, nor would the surrounding land use activities since they already co-exist. However, remediation activities on the Project Site could potentially impact the adjacent 32-acre property and the current farm operations. Dust generated by the demolition of the existing buildings and structures in the Northwest Operations Area, pipeline decommissioning activities, and remediation activities could produce a significant short-term impact and temporarily affect the productivity of row crops. The Applicant is proposing to construct a remedial soil cap, a minimum of 4 feet in thickness at the Northwest Operations Area. The cap would provide a barrier between the affected soil and 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-31 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR potential receptors. A portion of the remedial soil cap would extend off-site on to the adjacent agricultural parcel located just to the west of the Northwest Operations Area. The off-site area that would be capped is approximately 20 feet wide, and approximately 500 feet long running north to south. This adjacent parcel has historically been used for row crops as shown in Figure 4.15-1. Installation of the remedial cap could limit the use of this area for row crops. However, the area is about 0.2 acres and the entire parcel is about 32 acres. The Applicant has proposed as part of their project to have a land use convent for this adjacent property that would limit the land uses for the portions of the property that have been affected by petroleum contamination from the Project Site. The Applicant has proposed that the covenants related to land use would be reviewed and agreed upon by the lead municipality once the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) has been ratified by the RWQCB. This small reduction in available acreage would not affect the viability of this parcel to continue row crop production. Therefore, the remediation component of the Project would not result in the conversion of this adjacent farmland to non-agricultural use. Southern Properties Active row crop terrain and hay-cropped land abuts the southern side of the Project Site (near Esperanza Lane) and land used for livestock grazing also abuts the southern side of the site (refer to Figure 4.15-1). Areas containing developed industrial and business parks with light manufacturing, commercial offices, and service uses lie to the north of these agriculturally-used lands. The western portion of these agriculturally-used lands is within the City limits and has either an Open Space or Business Park land use designation. The eastern portion of these agriculturally-used lands is within the County limits (outside the URL) and has an Agriculture land use designation. The City also designates these properties as either Open Space or Agriculture. Existing County policies generally establish that development should occur within or contiguous to the limits of the existing URLs. These properties are adjacent to the URL. However, it should be noted that the portion of land south of the Project Site lies within the Greenbelt Area as identified in the San Luis Obispo Area Plan and is considered a rural land use area. That said, neither the Project, with its combination of Conservation/Open Space and Recreation land use designations, nor the adjacent properties designated Services & Manufacturing, would preclude the continuation of current agricultural activities permitted under existing land use classifications. However, the property adjacent to the south of the Project Site, also known as the Betita Property, along with the adjacent area in the Project Site, has a localized presence of petroleum in the subsurface (See Figure 2-6). The off-site area affected by this subsurface contamination is about five acres, and has historically been used for grazing. The Applicant has proposed as part of their project to have a land use convent for this adjacent property that would limit both the land use and the use of shallow groundwater for the portions of the property that have been affected by petroleum contamination from the Project Site. The Applicant has proposed that the covenants related to land use and groundwater would be reviewed and agreed upon by the lead municipality once the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) has been ratified by the RWQCB. Since the petroleum contamination is subsurface, the area could still be used for grazing, but other type of development and agriculture (i.e., row crops) could be limited by the Applicant proposed convent. Therefore, the remediation component of the Project would not result in the conversion of this adjacent farmland to non-agricultural use. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR No remediation activities are proposed for the southern edge near these adjacent agricultural properties. However, restoration work would occur along the southern edge of the Project Site. Dust generated from the restoration work could affect the productivity of row crops on agricultural parcels to the south, which could be a temporary, short-term significant impact. Mitigation Measures Implement mitigation measures AQ-1b, AQ-2a, and AQ-2b. Residual Impacts The application of mitigation measures AQ-1b, AQ-2a, and AQ-2b would serve to minimize dust impacts of the proposed development on adjacent row crop agricultural properties. With the implementation of these mitigation measures the impacts would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.15.6 City Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AR.4 The City Development Plan would result in the conversion of farmland or grazing land to non-agricultural uses. Development Class III The City Development Plan would involve development of approximately 17 percent of the Project Site with approximately 800,000 square feet (floor area) of business park and service commercial uses, and would include parking, landscaping, open space, recreational playing fields, and bicycle/pedestrian trails. The City Development Plan could also include land for the City to construct public facilities such as a transit maintenance yard and storage facility or a fire station and training facility. Build-out of this plan would involve finish grading followed by construction of the structures over a 25-year period. The location of the proposed development is shown in Figure 4.15-5. Development of the Northwest Operational Area, on the west side of the Project Site is the only area that would impact Prime Farmland. The Northwest Operations Area is developed with buildings, utilities, and pavement is not used for agricultural purposes. Therefore, this Prime Farmland would not represent a conversion to non-agricultural uses. About 30 acres of land that is currently available for grazing would be converted to development. With the multitude of site constraints, the historical use of the Project Site, and the limited grassland that is accessible for grazing, the Project Site has only has limited and intermittent grazing for the purpose of weed control since the 1990s. Historically, the Project Site has not been used for continuous cattle grazing for the purpose of raising animals. Cattle grazing could continue on the site with the development, but would have to be limited to areas outside of the restored wetland, VPFS habitat, and terrestrial areas. Given the biological sensitivity of these areas, it is likely that the Applicant would have to coordinate with the USFWS and CDFW to determine how to manage cattle at the site so they do not impact any of the biologically sensitive restoration areas. 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-33 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Given that the Project Site is only used for limited cattle grazing to control weeds, the multitude of site constraints, the historical use of the site, and the limited grassland that is accessible for grazing, the impacts of the City Development Plan on the conversion of grazing land would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required since the impact is less than significant. Residual Impacts The residual impact would be less than significant (Class III). Impact # Impact Description Phase Residual Impact AR.5 The City Development Plan would involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Development Class II Construction of the City Development Plan would result in dust generation that could impact row crop productivity on adjacent agricultural lands. This is particularly true for the development at the Northwest Operations Area. This impact would be limited to the initial stages of construction when some limited earth moving activities would be occurring. The Applicant has proposed to conduct most of the gross grading for the development pads as part of the remediation activities. Dust generation during the development phase of the project would be limited to the final grading. This could result in a short-term significant impact to row crop productivity. Further, there is potential after build out and operational activities commence that agricultural activities on the property adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area could create health-related and nuisance conflicts with occupants (employees and customers) in the form of pesticides, dust, odors and noise. However, in accordance with the California Civil Code “The Right To Farm Act” (Sections 3482.6 & 3482.6), this pre-existing agricultural use is not to be considered a nuisance. Therefore, the development at the Northwest Operations Area would continue to be subject to those inconveniences or discomforts arising from the adjacent agricultural operations. The potential impacts on the development could be potentially significant. Mitigation Measures Implement mitigation measures AQ-1b, AQ-2a, and AQ-2b. AR-5 The Applicant shall design the development for the Northwest Operations Area such that the buildings are located near the eastern edge of the parcel. This mitigation measure would not apply if the agricultural property adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area has received entitlements from the City to develop the property prior to development of the Northwest Operations Area. Residual Impacts The application of mitigation measures AR-4, AQ-1b, AQ-2a, and AQ-2b would serve to minimize dust impacts of the proposed development on adjacent row crop agricultural properties. Placing the buildings near the eastern edge of parcel would provide a buffer to reduce impacts of the adjacent agricultural operations on the proposed development in the Northwest Operations 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Area. With the implementation of these mitigation measures the impacts would be considered less than significant with mitigation (Class II). 4.15.7 County Development Plan Impacts and Mitigation Measures All of the impacts identified for the City Development Plan would apply to the County Development Plan. No additional impacts associated with the County Development Plan were identified. 4.15.8 Cumulative Analysis The cumulative section addresses how the Project may contribute to the conversion of agricultural land when viewed with other existing and reasonable future development in the area. Conversion of the Project Site to a mix of non-agricultural uses, such as Business Park, Conservation/Open Space, Recreation, and Service, would preclude use of those portions of the Project Site for agricultural purposes that are currently employed; that is, cattle grazing for fire prevention and weed control. However, as previously stated, the majority of the Project Site approximately 313 acres or 94 percent) is designated as Other or Not Prime Farmland by the FMMP. Regarding properties abutting the Project Site, land to the north of the site that falls within the City limits that is not designated Agriculture, but is currently used for grazing, has the potential for urban development, as does City land abutting the northwest portion of the Project Site. Full development of the Project in the Northwest Operations Area and the accompanying physical impacts, such as dust, odor and increased traffic, could impact the current agricultural uses on the adjacent properties by increasing pressure to convert to similar uses. Land designated Agriculture within the County to the south of the Project Site falls within a Greenbelt Area and has less urban development potential. However, as identified in Section 3.1.3, Table 3.1, Cumulative Project Number 24, a project has been approved that involves placement of top soil from the Costco site to agricultural land (Drake Farms) for agricultural use see Figure 4.15-1). This land is adjacent to the Project Site to the south. A combination of soil placement at that site and remediation and development at the Project Site could have cumulative impacts in the form of dust generation. That said, due to the condition of the majority of the Project Site’s soils and the extremely small likelihood for future productive agricultural use, as well as the land to the south falling within a Greenbelt Area, the Project would have cumulative impacts that are less than significant with mitigation. 4.15 Agricultural Resources December 2013 4.15-35 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 4.15.9 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 4.15.9.1 Remediation Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan The only mitigation measures identified for the remediation component of the Project were AQ- 1b, AQ-2a, and AQ-2b. See the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Air Quality (Section 4.1.8). 4.15.9.2 City Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation measures AQ-1b, AQ-2a, and AQ-2b would apply to the City Development Plan. See the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Air Quality (Section 4.1.8). Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Compliance Verification Method Timing Responsible Party AR-5 The Applicant shall design the development for the Northwest Operations Area such that the buildings are located near the eastern edge of the parcel. This mitigation measure would not apply if the agricultural property adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area has received entitlements from the City to develop the property prior to development of the Northwest Operations Area. Review of development plans Prior to issue of grading permits for development in the Northwest Operations Area City Community Development 4.15.9.3 County Development Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan All of the mitigation measures for the City Development Plan would also apply to the County Development Plan. 4.15.10 References California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2004. A Guide to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Documents/fmmp_guide_2004.pdf. Accessed on June 3, 2010. California Department of Conservation (CDC) 1997. California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model, Instruction Manual. http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dlrp/LESA/lesamodl.pdf. Accessed on June 14, 2010. San Luis Obispo County Department of Agriculture (SLOCDOA). 2011. Crop Report 2011. Top Twenty Value Crops. http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/AG/croprep/2011CropReport.pdf. Accessed on October 16, 2012. 4.15 Agricultural Resources Chevron Tank Farm 4.15-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR San Luis Obispo County Department of Agriculture (SLOCDOA). 2006. Agricultural Preserve Program. http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/PL/Ag/Ag+Preserve+Package.pdf. Accessed on June 14, 2010. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2010a. National Soil Survey Handbook Part 622. Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/contents/part622.html. Accessed on June 4, 2010. 2010b. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed on June 4, 2010. 2010c. Invasive and Noxious Weeds. http://plants.usda.gov/java/noxComposite. Accessed on June 7, 2010. University of California (UC). 1978. Storie Index Soil Rating. Special Publication 3203. Revised December 1978. California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act). 2010. Government Code Section 51201(c). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=51001- 52000&file=51200-51207. Accessed on June 4, 2010. California Invasive Plant Council (CIPC). 2010. California Invasive Plant Inventory Database. http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/inventory/weedlist.php. Accessed on June 7, 2010. Calflora. 2010. Calflora Database. http://www.calflora.org/. Accessed on June 7, 2010. City of San Luis Obispo (City). 2010a. Margarita Area Specific Plan. October 12, 2004. http://www.slocity.org/communitydevelopment/download/masp.pdf. Accessed on June 7, 2010. 2010b. General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element. 2006. 2010c. Municipal Code, Title 17 Zoning. May 4, 2010. 2010d. Airport Area Specific Plan. August 2005. San Luis Obispo County (SLOC). 2010a. Municipal Code, Title 5 Agriculture, Chapter 5.16 Agricultural Lands, Operations and the Right to Farm. 2010b. Municipal Code, Title 22 Land Use. December 8, 2009. 2010c. San Luis Obispo Area Plan. Revised October 14, 2009. 2010d. San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport Land Use Plan. Amended May 18, 2005. 2010e. General Plan Agriculture Element. Revised May 2010. 2010f. General Plan Framework for Planning (Inland) – Land Use Element. Revised October 2009. 2010g. General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element. May 2010. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-1 5.0 Alternatives Analysis The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15126.6, requires an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to describe a reasonable range of alternatives to a project or to the location of a project which could feasibly attain its basic objectives and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. This section discusses a range of alternatives to the proposed Project, including the “No Project Alternative.” Criteria used to evaluate the range of alternatives and remove certain alternatives from further consideration are addressed. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 provides direction for the discussion of alternatives to the proposed Project. This section requires: A description of “...a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of a project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives.” [15126.6(a)] A setting forth of alternatives that “...shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that the lead agency determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project.” [15126.6(f)] A discussion of the “No Project” alternative, and “...If the environmentally superior alternative is the “No Project” alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives” [15126.6(e)(2)], even if the proposed project is the next environmentally preferable option. A discussion and analysis of alternative locations “…that would substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project need to be considered for inclusion in the EIR.” 15126.6(f)(2)(B)]. An alternative location is not feasible for this project, as site remediation is a major project activity. This document has used an alternative screening analysis to select the alternatives evaluated in detail in the EIR. The alternative screening analysis provides the detailed explanation of why some of the alternatives were rejected from further analysis and assures that only the environmentally preferred alternatives are evaluated and compared in the EIR. This screening methodology also uses the “rule of reason” approach to alternatives as discussed in State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15126.6(f)). The rule of reason approach has been defined to require that EIRs address a range of feasible alternatives that have the potential to diminish or avoid adverse environmental impacts. The State CEQA Guidelines state: The alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effect of the project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that the lead agency determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project. (Section 15126.6(f)) 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR In defining feasibility of alternatives the State CEQA Guidelines state: Among the factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives are site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, other plans or regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries (projects with a regionally significant impact should consider the regional context), and whether the proponent can reasonably acquire, control or otherwise have access to the alternative site. (Section 15126.6(f)(1)) If an alternative was found to be technically infeasible, then it was dropped from further consideration. This was the primary feasibility factor that was used to eliminate an alternative without further screening analysis. In addition, CEQA states that alternatives should “…attain most of the basic objectives of the project ...” (Section 15126.6(a)). If an alternative was found to not obtain the basic objective, then it was also eliminated. The use of a screening analysis for the alternatives ensures that the full spectrum of environmental concerns is adequately represented, and that a reasonable choice of alternatives is selected for evaluation in the EIR. The screening criteria are discussed in the Alternatives Screening Analysis section. Given the CEQA mandates listed above, the remainder of this chapter covers: (1) a brief description of a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed Project; (2) a screening analysis that summarizes and compares the environmental effects of each alternative; (3) an environmental analysis of the alternatives that were selected for further consideration in the EIR; and (4) a discussion of the environmentally superior alternative. 5.1 Description of Alternatives The screening analysis considered a variety of alternatives to both the remediation and development portions of the Project, as well as a number of transportation alternatives that addressed road configurations. The alternatives have been divided into five different groups, each containing individual specific alternatives, which are: No Project Alternative Remediation Alternatives Mass Excavation Replace Remedial Caps with Excavation Institutional Controls and Long-Term Monitoring Only Development Alternatives Open Space Residential Development Development Consistent with AASP Development Consistent with County General Plan Reduced City Development Plan 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-3 Reduced County Development Plan Transportation Alternatives Unocal Collector Road Prado Road Extension Other County Development Alternatives City Water City Sewer The following sections summarize alternatives within each of these groups. 5.1.1 No Project Alternative CEQA requires that the specific alternative of the “No Project” be evaluated along with its impacts as part of the EIR (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e) (1)). For projects that are other than a land use or regulatory plan, the No Project alternative is the circumstances under which the project does not proceed. If disapproval of the project under consideration would result in predictable actions by others, such as the proposal for another project, this No Project consequence should be discussed (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(B)). The State CEQA Guidelines go on to say that the Lead Agency should analyze the impacts of the No Project Alternative by projecting what would reasonably be expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the proposed Project was not approved (Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(C)). The Applicant’s proposed Project is to conduct remediation of the Project Site consistent with the proposed Remedial Action Plan (RAP) that has been submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and then to develop the portions of the Project Site with a mix of commercial and business park development. With the No Project Alternative, the development of the site would not occur, and the Project Site would remain undeveloped. However, it is likely that the RWQCB and/or CDFW would still require some level of remediation of the site even with no development to assure protection of human health and ecological receptors. For the purposes of the EIR, it has been assumed that the remediation and restoration of the Project Site under the No Project Alternative would be similar to the proposed Project. The major change would be that the remediation portion of the Project would not include the construction of the rough pads for the proposed development. Instead, the areas that are proposed for development would be returned to their natural grade and revegetated. None of the proposed infrastructure improvements associated with roads would occur as part of the No Project Alternative. Only the storm water management improvements needed to support the remediation and restoration effort would be constructed on-site. The reader is referred to Section 2.3 of the EIR for a detailed description of the remediation and restoration activities that would occur under the No Project Alternative. Table 5-1 provides an estimate of the area grading and earthwork quantities associated with the remediation for the No Project Alternative. These are essentially the same numbers as for the proposed Project, but with a reduction the overall amount of fill needed. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-1 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities – No Project Alternative Grading Area acres) Work Area acres) Estimated Affected Soil cubic yards) Common Fill cubic yards) Structural Fill cubic yards ) Gravel cubic yards) Topsoil cubic yards) OU #1- Northwest Area 6.4 6.4 - 41,400 - - OU #2 -Reservoir 5 7.8 10.4 15,300 12,500 - 20,100 12,600 OU #2 -Reservoir 7 6.8 8.0 11,000 24,500 - 39,000 11,000 OU #3- Reservoir 4 52.6 52.6 - 100,000 - 29,000 OU #4- North Marsh Area 13.3 15.6 75,300 53,800 - - 21,500 OU #4- Reservoir 3 6.9 13.3 26,700 5,100 - 10,500 11,100 OU #4 -Remaining Petroleum Expressions 5.9 3.6 28,700 19,200 - - 9,500 OU #4 -Arsenic 1.0 1.3 2,675 3,300 1,650 Access Roads 4.7 4.7 3,800 Nursery 2.3 2.3 4,300 Contactor Staging Area 4 4 4,300 Total 123.8 134.3 159,675a 259,800 82,000 96,350 With 25 percent contingency 196,250 a. The 2,675 cubic yards from OU #4, Arsenic will be placed under caps onsite, leaving 157,000 cubic yard of NHIS to be hauled offsite. The Applicant has requested a 25% contingency be added to this offsite hauling number to account for the uncertainties associated with estimating impacted soil volumes for remediation projects. This would increase the number to 196,250 cubic yards. b. No structural fill is included in the No Project Alternative since no development would occur under this alternative. c. Estimated volumes were calculated based on what is assumed to be a minimum required remediation effort at the site as was determined in the Feasibility Study (2007). d. Estimated affected soil is assumed to be approximately 80 percent of the total soil excavated for all individual locations with the exception of arsenic impacted areas in OU #4 which is assumed to be 100 percent affected. Note: Under the No Project Alternative the amount of borrow material would be reduced compared to the proposed Project to account for the reduction in the amount of structural fill needed. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-5 The need for structural fill would be eliminated since the rough pads for the development would not be constructed. The amount of common fill would increase to account for a portion of the loss of structural fill. Use of material from the Flower Mound would still be needed as part of remediation as common fill for the excavations. With the No Project Alternative no backfill material would need to be imported to the site. Under the No Project Alternative, none of the proposed improvements to public roads (Tank Farm Road or Santa Fe Road) would occur. Other regional development-related improvements would not occur with the exception of storm water management improvements needed to support the remediation and restoration effort. In addition, none of the airport safety improvements such as grading work for Reservoir 2 or reserve areas would occur. Without development, the Project Site would not be available for public access. 5.1.2 Remediation/Restoration Alternatives Petroleum released as a result of the 1926 fire, and prior and subsequent Project Site operations have affected the soil and groundwater underlying the Project Site. The Applicant, along with its predecessors, conducted several investigations over the course of nearly two decades to study the soil, groundwater, and surface water conditions at the Project Site to assess the nature and distribution of hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater. The Applicant’s characterization of the contamination has included, in addition to their identification and delineation, an evaluation of its importance relative to human and ecological health and the need for its remediation. In order to validate the characterization process, the Applicant entered into two cooperative programs intended to foster regulatory participation and third-party expert review: the Remediation Technology Panel (RTP) and the Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team (SERRT). The first of these collaborative processes, the RTP, was established through a cooperative agreement between the Applicant and the RWQCB. The RTP consisted of three experts drawn from academia with expertise in the characterization and remediation of petroleum-affected sites, whose purview focused on soil- and groundwater-related issues. They identified data gaps within the existing site characterization, guided and reviewed subsequent characterization activities, and published a report summarizing their consensus understanding of subsurface issues at the Project Site (RTP 2006). The second of the cooperative efforts, the SERRT, was established in 2002 at the suggestion of staff at the RWQCB. This action was suggested in recognition of findings of studies which detailed the extent of sensitive resources on the Project Site, and the subsequent desire to consider a risk-based remediation program for the site. As part of the SERRT process the Applicant, regulatory agencies, and local municipalities have agreed on the risk assessment methodology, reviewed data, evaluated assessments, identified data gaps, established the risk associated with a given contamination source, and determined the extent of the remediation required for this Project Site. The SERRT formed two subgroups, the Human Health Risk Working Group (HHRWG) and the Ecological Risk Working Group (ERWG). Both groups included the Applicant, its 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-6 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR representatives and consultants, and the RWQCB. In addition, the HHRWG included representatives from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Division, and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOCAPCD). The ERWG in addition included representatives from the City, the County Planning Department, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The culmination of the Applicant’s characterization efforts was the Risk Management Summary, which identified contamination at the Project Site requiring remediation as agreed by the SERRT. The Risk Management Summary provided recommendations on treatment strategies based on levels and types of contamination, the potential ecological risks, and the potential impacts of clean-up. The result of the SERRT process was the development of the RAP. The RAP provides regulatory agencies, the municipalities with jurisdiction over the site, and other stakeholders detailed information on how the Applicant will implement the remedial actions agreed to by the SERT and proposed by the Applicant. As part of the EIR process a number of alternatives to the RAP were evaluated. Some of these alternatives were discussed as part of the SERRT process and rejected. They have been included here to assure full disclosure as required by CEQA. 5.1.2.1 Mass Excavation With this alternative the areas impacted by benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes BTEX), low-density non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL), former crude oil, pliable crude oil, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil greater than 1,000 mg/kg would be excavated. The 1,000 mg/kg was chosen since this is a cleanup level that has been established by the RWQCB for other excavation projects. In addition, soil with elevated arsenic concentrations would be removed.1 This approach does not include any capping. Figure 5-1 shows the areal extent (approximately 122 acres) of excavation under this alternative. This alternative assumes that all of the contaminants listed above that are located above groundwater would be removed. Where the contamination is below the water table, excavation would be conducted to a depth approximately five feet below the historic low groundwater elevation. Table 5-2 provides an estimate of the area grading and earthwork quantities associated with the remediation for this alternative. It is estimated that the volume of excavation within the limits shown on Figure 5-1 would be approximately 2,528,000 cubic yards. Assuming that 80 percent of the excavated soil is impacted (i.e., 20 percent or 400,000 cubic yards can be salvaged and reused), approximately 2,000,000 cubic yards of the excavated soil would be affected. For the purpose of evaluating offsite hauling impacts, the same 25 percent contingency used in the Applicant’s proposed project will be applied to this alternative, increasing the affected soil transported to an offsite facility to almost 2,500,000 cubic yards. 1 The arsenic concentrations identified on the Site do not exceed state or federal hazardous waste thresholds; however, they are considered to be elevated because they equal or exceed project site-specific background levels established for the Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA). 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-7 Figure 5-1 Mass Excavation Areas 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-8 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-2 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities – Mass Excavation Area Grading Area acres) Work Area acres) Estimated Affected Soil cubic yards)e Common Fill cubic yards) Structural Fill cubic yards ) Gravel cubic yards) Topsoil cubic yards) OU #1- Northwest Area 6.4 6.4 104,944 131,180 53,400 - - OU #2 -Reservoir 5 15.7 16.5 344,000 430,000 - - 25,400 OU #2 -Reservoirs 6&7 25.7 28.0 584,160 730,200 - - 41,500 OU #3- Reservoir 4 52.6 52.6 93,200 116,500 262,800 - - OU #4- North Marsh Area 7.2 8.0 32,400 23,200 - - 11,600 OU #4- Reservoir 3 20.3 22.0 445,200 556,500 - - 32,800 OU #4 -Remaining Petroleum Expressions 4.8 4.8 25,000 25,000 - - 7,750 OU#4- Arsenicf 5.4 g 5.7 g 25,950 3,300 h - - 1,650 Reservoir 2 a 25.9 28.0 368,000 460,000 - - 41,800 Borrow Area #2c 12.1 12.1 - - 57,900 - - Access Roads 4.7 4.7 - - - 3,800 - Nursery 2.3 2.3 - - - 4,300 - Contactor Staging Area 4.0 4.0 - - - 4,300 - Totald 187.3 195.3 2,022,854b 2,475,880 374,100 12,400 162,500 With 25 percent contingency ~2,500,000 a. Grading will involve approximately 38,000 cubic yards of berm material, with the anticipation that no or minimal materials will be imported or exported relative to this activity. b. A 25% contingency will be added to this number to account for the uncertainties associated with estimating impacted soil volumes for remediation projects. c. Borrow Area #2 is defined as potential topsoil borrow source located on the eastern portion of the site, south of Tank Farm Road. d. Estimated volumes were calculated based on the lateral extent of excavation shown in Figure 5-1 to depths as described in the excavation alternative of the Feasibility Study (2007). e. Estimated affected soil is assumed to be approximately 80 percent of the total soil excavated for all individual locations with the exception of arsenic impacted areas in OU #4 which is assumed to be 100 percent affected. f. Arsenic removal addresses the upper 2 feet of the Northwest Operations Area and the upper 2 feet of soil in an isolated area adjacent to Reservoir 2. g. The areas listed here the total area impacted by arsenic adjacent to Reservoir 2, and the incremental area impacted by arsenic (i.e., not already accounted for in the TPH excavation) in the Northwest Operations Area (Figure 5-1). h. Arsenic related backfill includes only the area adjacent to Reservoir 2. Backfill for the Northwest Operations Area is accounted for in a separate line item. Note: Under the mass excavation alternative the amount of fill material needed would be increased over the proposed Project. This additional fill material would be trucked to the site from an off-site source. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-9 This alternative includes offsite removal of soils impacted by arsenic. The areas of arsenic impact are the upper two feet of soil within the Northwest Operations Area, and the upper two feet of soil over an isolated area adjacent to Reservoir 2. The total volume of arsenic impacted soil is estimated to be 25,950 cubic yards, which is considered to be included in the contingency of the total excavation and offsite hauling volume of 2.5 million cubic yards. This alternative assumes that most of this material would be trucked to the Santa Maria Landfill for use in the closure of landfill cells as part of the Landfill’s Non-Hazardous Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil (NHIS) program. It is possible that some of the material, particularly the arsenic- impacted soil, would not meet the acceptance criteria for that program and would need to be transported to another disposal facility such as Buttonwillow in Kern County or Kettlemen Hills in Kings County, if it did not meet the NHIS criteria for the Santa Maria Landfill. For this alternative, it is anticipated that the development areas would be graded as shown in the Applicant’s proposed project and the open space areas would be graded to an elevation that blends with surrounding topography and promotes drainage. It is estimated that requirements for fill would be approximately 3,000,000 cubic yards. As with the Applicant’s proposed project, approximately 626,000 cubic yards of material can be obtained from onsite borrow areas for backfilling. With the onsite borrow areas and the approximate 400,000 cubic yards assumed to be salvaged for reuse, an estimated 2,000,000 cubic yards of fill material would have to be imported. This would require about 156,000 truck trips to remove the impacted soil and about 125,000 truck trips to bring in additional fill material. It is likely that this level of excavation would take eight to ten years to complete and would result in an average of between 110 and 140 truck trips per work day. For the excavations below groundwater, additional construction activities would be needed to stabilize and dewater the excavation area. This would require the installation of sheet pile around the excavations, a dewatering system (wells and pumps), and water treatment facilities which would be delivered to the site via truck. Sheet pile drivers would be used to install the sheet pile. As groundwater appeared in the excavation area it would be pumped out and processed in the water treatment facility located on site. The treated water would then be sprayed on areas of the Project Site, discharged on site to one of the creeks, or sent to the City of San Luis Obispo sewer system. Any discharge of excavation water would require a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit from the RWQCB. Under this alternative it is likely that up to 168,000,000 gallons 2 of groundwater would be generated. It is possible that some of the recovered groundwater would not be suitable for discharge even after treatment, primarily due to exposure to contaminants in the soil during excavation. Any water that could not be discharged consistent with the requirements of the WDR would have to be trucked from the site using vacuum trucks, and hauled to an approved facility for disposal or recycling. 2 Calculation of estimated dewatering volume is based on an assumed typical excavation rate of 800 cubic yards per day with dewatering wells placed at intervals of 10 feet and pumping rates of 2 gallons per minute (Feasibility Study, 2007) . This assumes approximately 43 gallons per square foot of excavation. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-10 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR As shown in Figure 5-1, affected soil is located under Tank Farm Road in four discrete sections for a total length of about 1,300 feet. It is estimated that the volume of affected soil beneath Tank Farm Road is approximately 30,000 cubic yards. The work involving Tank Farm Road would require road closures for road removal, soil excavation and rebuilding of the road. Approximately 74,000 lineal feet of pipeline is estimated to currently exist at the site (Appendix L, Remedial Action Plan, 2007). The Mass Excavation alternative will require removal of approximately 30,600 lineal feet, or roughly 40 percent, of that pipeline This alternative would result in direct impacts from remediation, restoration and development activities to about 45 acres of wetland habitat, of which approximately 21 acres is Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (VPFS) habitat. The remainder of the impacted acreage contains various types of vegetation including a number of rare plant species and other sensitive habitat. Once the excavations were completed, the sites would be backfilled as described above. For areas where there is planned development, rough graded pads would be constructed. In other areas the sites would be recontoured back to natural grade to promote drainage and then revegetated and restored. As part of the restoration, new wetland areas would be created, some with VPFS habitat. 5.1.2.2 Replace Remedial Caps with Excavation This alternative is similar to the Applicant’s Proposed Project except areas designated for remedial capping would be excavated and then backfilled. In addition, soil with elevated arsenic concentrations will be removed and transported offsite for disposal. Figure 5-2 shows the location of the areas that would be excavated under this alternative. This alternative assumes that most of the excavated material would be trucked to the Santa Maria Landfill for use in the closure of landfill cells as part of the Landfill’s Non-Hazardous Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil (NHIS) program. It is possible that some of the excavated material, particularly the arsenic-impacted soil, would not meet the acceptance criteria for that program and would need to be transported to another disposal facility such as Buttonwillow in Kern County or Kettlemen Hills in Kings County, if it did not meet the NHIS criteria for the Santa Maria Landfill. Table 5-3 provides an estimate of the area grading and earthwork quantities associated with the remediation for this alternative. It is estimated that the volume of excavation within the limits shown on Figure 5-2 would be about 557,000 cubic yards. Assuming that 80 percent of the excavated soil is impacted (i.e., 20 percent or 111,000 cubic yards can be salvaged and reused), approximately 446,000 cubic yards of affected soil would be transported to an offsite facility. For the purpose of evaluating offsite hauling impacts, the same 25 percent contingency used in the Applicant’s proposed project will be applied to this alternative, increasing the affected soil transported to an offsite facility to 558,000 cubic yards. This alternative includes offsite removal of soils impacted by arsenic. The areas of arsenic impact are the upper two feet of soil within the Northwest Operations Area, and the upper two feet of soil over an isolated area adjacent to Reservoir 2. The total volume of arsenic impacted 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-11 soil is estimated to be 25,950 cubic yards, which is considered to be included in the contingency of the total excavation volume of 558,000 cubic yards. This alternative assumes that most of this material would be trucked to the Santa Maria Landfill for use in the closure of landfill cells as part of the Landfill’s NHIS program. It is possible that some of the material, particularly the arsenic-impacted soil, would not meet the acceptance criteria for that program and would need to be transported to another disposal facility such as Buttonwillow in Kern County or Kettlemen Hills in Kings County, if it did not meet the NHIS criteria for the Santa Maria Landfill. Under this alternative, total demand for fill will be approximately 963,000 cubic yards. As with the Applicant’s proposed project, approximately 626,000 cubic yards of material for backfilling will be available onsite. Salvaged excavated soil will provide another 111,000 cubic yards of fill material, so an estimated 226,000 cubic yards of material would need to be imported to the Project Site. This would require about 35,000 truck trips to remove the impacted soil and 14,000 truck trips to bring in additional fill material. It is likely that this level of excavation would take three to six years to complete and would result in an average of between 32 to 65 truck trips per work day. For the excavations extending below groundwater, additional construction activities would be needed to stabilize and dewater the excavation area. This would require the installation of sheet pile, a dewatering system (wells and pumps), and water treatment facilities which would be delivered to the site via truck. Sheet pile drivers would be used to install the sheet pile. As groundwater appeared in the excavation area it would be pumped out and processed in a water treatment facility that would need to be constructed on site. The treated water would then be sprayed on areas of the Project Site, discharged to on site to one of the creeks or sent to the City of San Luis Obispo sewer system. Any discharge of excavation water would require a WDR permit from the RWQCB. Under this alternative it is likely that up to 29,000,000 gallons 3 of groundwater would be generated. It is possible that some of the recovered groundwater would not be suitable for discharge even after treatment, primarily due to exposure to contaminants in the soil during excavation. Any water that could not be discharged consistent with the requirements of the WDR would have to be trucked from the site using vacuum trucks, and hauled to an approved facility for disposal or recycling. As can be seen on Figure 5-2, this alternative involves excavation of affected soil located under approximately 300 feet of Tank Farm Road. It is estimated that the volume of affected soil beneath the relevant portions of Tank Farm Road is approximately 6,700 cubic yards. The work involving Tank Farm Road would require road closures for road removal, soil excavation and rebuilding of the road. This alternative will require removal of approximately 11,700 lineal feet, or 16 percent, of the abandoned facility pipelines. 3 Calculation of estimated dewatering volume is based on an assumed typical excavation rate of 800 cubic yards per day with dewatering wells placed at intervals of 10 feet and pumping rates of 2 gallons per minute (Feasibility Study, 2007) . This assumes approximately 43 gallons per square foot of excavation. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-12 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 5-2 Excavation Areas for Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-13 Table 5-3 Area Grading and Earthwork Quantities – Replace Remedial caps with Excavation Grading Area acres) Work Area acres) Estimated Affected Soil cubic yards) Common Fill cubic yards) Structural Fill cubic yards ) Gravel cubic yards) Topsoil cubic yards) OU #1- Northwest Area 6.4 6.4 74,000 92,500 53,400 - - OU #2 -Reservoir 5 7.8 10.4 90,000 109,700 - 20,100 12,600 OU #2 -Reservoir 7 6.8 8 74,400 106,500 - 39,000 11,000 OU #3- and Flower Mound Borrow Area Reservoir 4 52.6 52.6 12,000 15,000 262,800 - - OU #4- North Marsh Area 13.3 15.6 37,400 25,200 - - 21,500 OU #4- Reservoir 3 15 20 108,300 103,700 - 10,500 24,000 OU #4 -Remaining Petroleum Expressions 5.9 3.6 17,200 12,000 - - 9,500 OU#4 – Arsenicf 5.4g 5.7g 25.950 3,300h - - 1,650 Reservoir 2 a 11.9 11.9 7,200 9,000 - - 19,200 Borrow Area #2 c 12.1 12.1 - - 57,900 - - Access Roads 4.7 4.7 3,800 Nursery 2.3 2.3 4,300 Contactor Staging Area 4 4 4,300 Totald 148.4 159.9 446,450b 476,900 374,100 82,000 99,450 With 25 percent contingency 558,000 a. Grading will involve approximately 38,000 cubic yards of berm material, with the anticipation that no or minimal materials will be imported or exported relative to this activity. Some small areas of petroleum expressions within the grading boundaries will be excavated; volume is included in OU#4. b. A 25% contingency be added to this number to account for the uncertainties associated with estimating impacted soil volumes for remediation projects. This would increase the number to 529,000 cubic yards. c. Borrow Area #2 is defined as potential topsoil borrow source located on the eastern portion of the site, south of Tank Farm Road. d. Estimated volumes were calculated based on the lateral extent of excavation shown in Figure 5-2 to depths as described in the excavation alternative of the Feasibility Study (2007). e. Estimated affected soil is assumed to be approximately 80 percent of the total soil excavated with the exception of arsenic impacted areas in OU #4 which is assumed to be 100 percent affected. f. Arsenic removal addresses the upper 2 feet of the Northwest Operations Area and the upper 2 feet of soil in an isolated area adjacent to Reservoir 2 g. The areas listed here the total area impacted by arsenic adjacent to Reservoir 2, and the incremental area impacted by arsenic (i.e., not already accounted for in the TPH excavation) in the Northwest Operations Area (Figure 5-1). h. Arsenic related backfill includes only the area adjacent to Reservoir 2. Backfill for the Northwest Operations Area is accounted for in a separate line item. Note: Under this alternative the amount of fill material would be increased over the proposed Project. This additional fill material would be trucked to the site. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-14 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR This alternative would result in direct impacts from remediation, restoration and development activities similar to the Applicant’s proposed project to restore wetlands, VPFS habitat and other rare plants and sensitive habitat Once the excavations were completed, the sites would be backfilled as described above. The backfill material would come from onsite borrow locations and material trucked to the site. For areas where there is planned development, rough graded pads would be constructed. In other areas the sites would be recontoured back to their natural grade and then revegetated and restored. In addition, new wetland areas would need to be created that included VPFS habitat. 5.1.2.3 Institutional Controls and Long-Term Monitoring Only This alternative would not have any remediation activities, but would only involve the implementation of institutional controls and long-term monitoring. Those institutional controls would include deed restrictions and use covenants limiting land use in areas of the site and some offsite areas, a soil management plan implemented in the event contaminated soils are disturbed subsequent to development, and prohibition on water wells within affected areas. Specific institutional controls would depend partially on the degree of public access and development, but are expected to include fencing, signs, awareness programs, and similar active measures to manage the site. Other institutional controls could include deed restrictions and other covenants as needed to manage the Project Site. Long-term monitoring would include periodic inspections and maintenance as needed to ensure that the institutional controls remain effective. 5.1.3 Development Alternatives The EIR has evaluated five alternatives to the proposed development. Each of these alternatives is discussed below. 5.1.3.1 Open Space This development alternative is the same as the No Project Alternative. Under this alternative no development would occur, but the site would be remediated and restored and the property would remain as open space. Without development, none of the Class I trails on the site would be constructed for public access. As such, none of the site would be available for public access. Since this is the same as the No Project Alternative, it is not discussed further in the EIR. 5.1.3.2 Residential Development With this alternative the property would be remediated as described for the proposed Project and then residential homes would be developed on the Project Site. This would require the City or County to rezone the property for residential use or to allow clustering in the current Residential zoning. The entire Project Site is within the Airport runway safety zones. The Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) limits residential development within the S-1b and S-1c safety zones to 0.2 dwelling units per acre. The total Project Site acreage is 332 acres. Per the ALUP a maximum of 66 single family homes could be built on the Project Site. Assuming one-quarter acre lots for each home a total of about 25 acres would be needed, including the acreage for roads and other infrastructure. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-15 It is likely that if residential homes were built on the Project Site, they would be located in the northeast corner of the site. This area has no hydrocarbon contamination, minimal wetlands, and is outside of the 100-year flood plain and the airport protection zone. No development would occur south of Tank Farm Road or on the western edge of the Project Site. As part of the residential development it is assumed that Tank Farm Road would be widened, and the extension of Santa Fe Road would be built north of Tank Farm Road into the Project Site, which would provide access the residential homes. Table 5-4 provides an estimate of the traffic, water uses and wastewater that would be generated from the residential development. Table 5-4 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater for Residential Development Traffic Water Use Wastewater Trip Generation per du, weekday Trip Generation per du, weekend Total Trips, Weekday Total Trips, Weekend Water Use Factor per du AFY) Water Use AFY) Indoor Use (% total water) Wastewater Generated AFY) Wastewater Generated gals/day) 9.57 10.12 632 668 0.62 40.7 70 28.5 25,456 1. Water use factor based upon 551 gallons per day per du. 2. Trip generation rates from Trip Generation, (8th edition), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers 3. du – dwelling unit. 4. Assumes a total of 66 detached single family homes. Under a City plan the residential development would connect with City utilities to provide water and sewer. Under the County plan water would be provide by onsite groundwater wells and wastewater would be treated in an onsite wastewater treatment facility. 5.1.3.3 Development Consistent with Current City Airport Area Specific Plan AASP) The current Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) developed and approved by the City of San Luis Obispo, included development of the Project Site. Under the AASP the Project Site has the following designations: Business Park (BP-SP): 3.0 acres for business park land, located at the northeastern portion the Project Site. Access would be from the proposed extension of Santa Fe Road. Service-Commercial (C-S-SP): 52.01 acres for Service Commercial uses located along the western edge of the Project Site, north of Tank Farm Road, and along the eastern edge of the Project Site on both sides of Tank Farm Road. Access to the western Service and Manufacturing areas would be from Tank Farm Road and a new access road along the western edge of the Project Site and new local roads. Services and Manufacturing uses to the east would be accessed from Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road, and new local roads. Conservation/Open Space (C/OS-SP): 257.95 acres designated as open space on both sides of Tank Farm Road that would serve as Airport Reserve Spaces. Figure 5-3 shows the location of the development for this alternative. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-16 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 5-3 Development Plan Consistent with City Airport Area Specific Plan 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-17 With this alternative, remediation would be essentially the same as for the proposed Project. The major difference would be the location of some of the grading and placement of structural fill. With this alternative a considerable amount of additional grading would be required in the northwest corner of the Project Site to accommodate development in this area. Less grading and less structural fill would be needed in the north east corner of the Project Site since no development would occur in this area. About 18 acres of the development of the northwest corner of the property would occur within the 100-year flood plain and elevation of the area would have to be increased by about 8-10 feet. This would require about 260,000 cubic yards of structural fill to be placed in the northwest area of the Project Site. This would also impact about an additional eight acres of wetland habitat and about an additional 3.5 acres of VPFS habitat in the northwest areas of the Project Site. With this alternative there would be a reduction of about 30,000 cubic yards of structural fill in the northeast area of the Project Site as compared to the proposed Project. Development would be phased over a 25-year period. The City would provide water, sewer, and public services such as police and fire. The City recently installed a sewer trunk line in Tank Farm Road along the property’s frontage (July 2009). The potable and recycled water mains and utilities would be extended to the developable areas. Specific land uses for the various zoning designations are unknown as this time since the development would be built over a 25-year period. Economic and market forces would drive the type of land uses that could be built in each of the zoning designations. The AASP provides a list of allowable land uses for each of the zoning designations. In addition, the ALUP provides guidance on what types of land uses are allowed within each airport safety zones. As part of the EIR process, the City, County, and Applicant developed a possible list of land uses that could be developed on the site taking into account the allowable land uses specified in the AASP and ALUP. Table 5-5 provides the list of possible land uses for each zoning designation. Table 5-5 Possible Development Land Use Mix- City AASP Development Zoning Designation Possible Land Use Square Footage Business Park Business Park (Offices) 50,000 Service-Commercial Light Manufacturing 350,000 Industrial Research and Development 250,000 General Retail 15,000 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 20,000 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 Total 800,000 The land uses were selected to represent a wide range of possible uses that would generate a reasonable worst case level of traffic and other issue area impacts. Since the tenants have not yet 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-18 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR been established, there is a potential variation on types and size of each of these uses. However, the parameters provided in Table 5-5 are anticipated to encompass most development scenarios. The land uses have been selected as conservative estimates and are likely the most intensive uses for the Project Site in order to evaluate a scenario that produces the highest level of impact to be analyzed in this environmental document. Under this alternative there would be no recreational fields. Once this alternative is completely built-out, there would be an increase in traffic associated with the development and an increase in water use and wastewater generated. Traffic levels are estimated based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. Water use rates are based on water use factors provided by the City Utilities Department. Table 5-6 shows the estimated water use, wastewater, and the traffic generated for this alternative at build- out in an estimated 25 years. Table 5-6 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater for City AASP Development Development Type Floor Area square feet) Weekday Average Daily OW Trips Weekend Average Daily OW Trips Water Use af/year) Wastewater gals/day) Business Park (Offices) 50,000 571 82 3.3 2,062 Light Manufacturing 350,000 1,337 522 24.9 19,965 Industrial Research and Development 250,000 2,028 475 25.0 15,622 General Retail 15,000 644 750 0.1 96 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 20,000 632 317 0.6 375 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 220 440 1.0 803 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 70 13 0.7 444 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 125 117 1.5 1,036 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 349 66 1.5 1,036 1. Water Use and Wastewater factors based on City of SLO Utilities Department. 2. Trip Generation Rates from ITE 8th Edition. OW-One-Way; af-acre-feet 5.1.3.4 Development Consistent with Current County General Plan The current County General Plan developed and approved by the County of San Luis Obispo, included development of the Project Site. Under the General Plan the Project Site has the following designations: Commercial Service (CS): 16.24 acres for commercial service uses, located at the northeast corner of the Project Site. Access would be from the proposed extension of Santa Fe Road and new local roads. Industrial (I): 41.19 acres for Industrial uses located along the western edge of the Project Site, north of Tank Farm Road, and along the eastern edge of the Project Site on the north side of Tank Farm Road. Access to the western Industrial areas would be from Tank Farm Road and a new access road along the western edge of the Project Site and new local roads. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-19 Industrial uses to the east would be accessed from Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road, and new local roads. Recreation (REC): 246.75 acres designated as recreation on both sides of Tank Farm Road that would be open space. Agricultural (AG): 14 acres designated as agricultural land located on the southern section of the Project Site. Figure 5-4 shows the location of the development for this alternative. With this alternative, remediation would be essentially the same as for the proposed Project. The major difference would be the location of some of the grading and placement of structural fill. With this alternative a considerable amount of additional grading would be required in the northwest corner of the Project Site to accommodate development in this area. About 24 acres of the development of the northwest corner of the property would occur within the 100-year flood plain and elevation of the area would have to be increased by about 8-10 feet. This would require about 350,000 cubic yards of structural fill to be placed in the northwest area of the Project Site. This would also impact about an additional nine acres of wetland habitat and about an additional four acres of VPFS habitat in the northwest areas of the Project Site. Development would be phased over a 25-year period. This alternative would have a wastewater treatment facility, and onsite wells to provide sewer and water, respectively, to the development. The proposed wastewater treatment design would be similar to that for the Proposed City Development Plan (see Section 2.5.2.1). Specific land uses for the various zoning designations are unknown as this time since the development would be built over a 25-year period. Economic and market forces would drive the type of land uses that could be built in each the zoning designations. The ALUP provides guidance on what types of land uses are allowed within each airport safety zones. Table 5-7 provides the list of possible land uses for each zoning designation. Table 5-7 Possible Development Land Use Mix- County General Plan Development Zoning Designation Possible Land Use Square Footage Business Park Business Park (Offices) 240,000 General Retail 15,000 Service-Commercial Light Manufacturing 200,000 Industrial Research and Development 210,000 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 20,000 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 Total 800,000 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-20 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 5-4 Development Plan Consistent with County General Plan 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-21 The land uses were selected to represent a wide range of possible uses that would generate a reasonable worst case level of traffic and other issue area impacts. Since the tenants have not yet been established, there is a potential variation on types and size of each of these uses. However, the parameters provided in Table 5-7 are anticipated to encompass most development scenarios. The land uses have been selected as conservative estimates and are likely the most intensive uses for the Project Site in order to evaluate a scenario that produces the highest level of impact to be analyzed in this environmental document. Under this alternative there would be no recreational fields. Once this alternative is completely built-out, there would be an increase in traffic associated with the development and an increase in water use and wastewater generated. Traffic levels are estimated based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. Water use rates are based on water use factors provided by the City Utilities Department. Table 5-8 shows the estimated water use, wastewater, and the traffic generated for this alternative at build- out in an estimated 25 years. Table 5-8 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater for County General Plan Development Development Type Floor Area square feet) Weekday Average Daily One Way Trips Weekend Average Daily One Way Trips Water Use af/year) Wastewater gals/day) Business Park (Offices) 240,000 2,741 394 15.8 9,898 Light Manufacturing 200,000 764 298 14.2 11,408 Industrial Research and Development 210,000 1,703 399 21.0 13,122 General Retail 15,000 644 750 0.1 96 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 20,000 632 317 0.6 375 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 220 440 1.0 803 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 70 13 0.7 444 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 50,000 125 117 1.5 1,036 Wholesaling and Distribution 50,000 349 66 1.5 1,036 1. Water Use and Wastewater factors based on City of SLO Utilities Department. 2. Trip Generation Rates from ITE 8th Edition. af-acre-feet 5.1.3.5 Reduced Development This alternative would be very similar to the proposed Project, but less development would occur on the Project Site. With the reduced development alternative development would be limited to 562,000 square feet of building space. No development would occur on the western portion of the site just north of Tank Farm Road. This is the area of the former Northwest Operations Area, and is the location of the highest level of contamination. Under this alternative, remediation in this area would be the same as for the proposed Project, but development pads would not be constructed. This would reduce the need for structural fill in this area by about 25,000 cubic 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-22 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR yards. The Northwest Operations Area would be recontoured to a natural grade and then revegetated. All of the other remediation restoration activities associated with the proposed Project would remain the same under this alternative. This would be the case for both reduced development in the City or the County. An evaluation of the significant Class I impacts for the Development Project showed that the diesel PM impact could be reduced to less than significant with a 30% reduction in building square footage. Given that the significant traffic impact under the full City build out scenario was already significant without the project, only the No Project Alternative would eliminate this impact. This served as the basis for establishing the reduced development alternative at 562,000 square feet of building space. Reduced City Development Plan Under the City Development Plan the reduced development alternative would consist of the following: Business Park (BP-SP): 27.85 acres for business park land, located at the northeastern portion the Project Site. Access would be from the proposed extension of Santa Fe Road. It is envisioned that this area would be developed with a campus-like business park. Service-Commercial (C-S-SP): 19.93 acres for Service Commercial uses located mostly within the Tank Farm Road Corridor on the eastern edge of the Project Site. Services and Commercial uses would be accessed from Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road, and a new local road. Conservation/Open Space (C/OS-SP): 255.92 acres designated as open space on both sides of Tank Farm Road that would serve as Airport Reserve Spaces. This area would include a number of off-road bike trails along the perimeter of the open space. Public Facilities (PF-SP): 15.05 acres located immediately west of the 26-acre area proposed for Service-Commercial may be used as active sports fields or other public use. Figure 5-5 shows the location of the City development for this alternative. Development would be phased over a 25-year period. The City would provide water, sewer, and public services such as police and fire. The City recently installed a sewer trunk line in Tank Farm Road along the property’s frontage (July 2009). The potable and recycled water mains and utilities would be extended to the developable areas. Specific land uses for the various zoning designations are unknown as this time since the development would be built over a 25-year period. Economic and market forces would drive the type of land uses that could be built in each of the zoning designations. The AASP provides a list of allowable land uses for each of the zoning designations. In addition, the ALUP provides guidance on what types of land uses are allowed within each airport safety zones. As part of the EIR process, the City, County, and Applicant developed a possible list of land uses that could be developed on the site taking into account the allowable land uses specified in the AASP and ALUP. Table 5-9 provides the list of possible land uses for each zoning designation. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-23 Figure 5-5 Reduced City Development Plan 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-24 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-9 Possible Development Land Use Mix - Reduced City Development Plan Zoning Designation Possible Land Use Square Footage Business Park Business Park (Offices) 234,000 Printing and Publishing 10,000 Hotel (115 rooms) 70,000 Specialized Education /Training Facility 5,000 Service-Commercial Light Manufacturing 50,000 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 General Retail 15,000 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 10,000 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 40,000 Wholesaling and Distribution 48,000 Public -Facility Public Transit maintenance and Storage Facility 10,000 Public Fire Station and Training Facility 5,000 Recreational Fields 15 acres Total 562,000 The land uses were selected to represent a wide range of possible uses that would generate a reasonable worst case level of traffic and other issue area impacts. Since the tenants have not yet been established, there is a potential variation on types and size of each of these uses. However, the parameters provided in Table 5-9 are anticipated to encompass most development scenarios. The land uses have been selected as conservative estimates and are likely the most intensive uses for the Project Site in order to evaluate a scenario that produces the highest level of impact to be analyzed in this environmental document. Once this alternative is completely built-out, there would be an increase in traffic associated with the development and an increase in water use and wastewater generated. Traffic levels are estimated based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. Water use rates are based on water use factors provided by the City Utilities Department. Table 5-10 shows the estimated water use, wastewater, and the traffic generated for this alternative at build- out in an estimated 25 years. Table 5-10 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater - Reduced City Development Plan Development Type Floor Area square feet) Weekday Average Daily One Way Trips Weekend Average Daily One Way Trips Water Use af/year) Wastewater gals/day) Business Park (Offices) 234,000 2,672 384 15.4 9,651 Printing and Publishing 10,000 70 13 0.7 570 Hotel (115 room) 70,000 572 573 49.5 30,900 Specialized Education /Training Facility 5,000 137 56 0.3 206 Light Manufacturing 50,000 191 75 3.6 2,852 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 406 95 5.0 3,124 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-25 Table 5-10 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater - Reduced City Development Plan Development Type Floor Area square feet) Weekday Average Daily One Way Trips Weekend Average Daily One Way Trips Water Use af/year) Wastewater gals/day) General Retail 15,000 644 750 0.1 96 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 10,000 316 159 0.3 187 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 220 440 1.0 803 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 70 13 0.7 444 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 40,000 100 93 1.2 828 Wholesaling and Distribution 48,000 335 63 1.4 994 Public Transit maintenance and Storage Facility 10,000 45 11 0.2 144 Public Fire Station and Training Facility 5,000 80 27 0.3 200 Recreational Fields 15 acres 69 867 21.0 937 1. Recreational Fields area numbers are in acres. 2. Trip Generation Rates from ITE 8th Edition except Specialized Education from San Diego Association of Governments Rates. 3. Recreational field traffic numbers based upon 90 persons per weekday and 1,300 persons per weekend. 4. Water Use and Wastewater factors based on City of SLO Utilities Department. af-acre-feet Reduced County Development Plan Under the County Development Plan the reduced development alternative would consist of the following: Commercial Service (CS): 16.24 acres for commercial service uses, located at the northeast corner of the Project Site. Access would be from the proposed extension of Santa Fe Road and new local roads. Industrial (I): 35.11 acres for Industrial uses located along the eastern edge of the Project Site. Industrial uses to the east would be accessed from Tank Farm Road, Santa Fe Road, and new local roads. Recreation (REC): 252.83 acres designated as recreation on both sides of Tank Farm Road that would be open space. Figure 5-6 shows the location of the development for this alternative. Development would be phased over a 25-year period. The building square footage would be the same as discussed above for the City reduced development alternative (562,000 square feet). This alternative would have a wastewater treatment facility, and onsite wells to provide sewer and water, respectively, to the development. The proposed wastewater treatment design would be similar to that for the County Development Plan component of the Project (see Section 2.5.2.1). 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-26 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Figure 5-6 Reduced County Development Plan 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-27 Specific land uses for the various zoning designations are unknown as this time since the development would be built over a 25-year period. Economic and market forces would drive the type of land uses that could be built in each the zoning designations. The ALUP provides guidance on what types of land uses are allowed within each of the airport safety zones. As part of the EIR process, the City, County, and Applicant developed a possible list of land uses that could be developed on the Project Site taking into account the allowable land uses specified in the AASP and ALUP. Table 5-11 provides the list of possible land uses for each zoning designation. Table 5-11 Possible Development Land Use Mix - Reduced County Development Plan Zoning Designation Possible Land Use Square Footage Commercial Service Business Park (Offices) 249,000 General Retail 15,000 Hotel (115 rooms) 70,000 Wastewater Treatment Facility 1 acre Industrial Light Manufacturing 50,000 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 Printing and Publishing 10,000 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 10,000 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 40,000 Wholesaling and Distribution 48,000 Specialized Education/Training Facility 5,000 Recreation Recreational Fields 15 acres Total 562,000 The land uses were selected to represent a wide range of possible uses that would generate a reasonable worst case level of traffic and other issue area impacts. Since the tenants have not yet been established, there is a potential variation on types and size of each of these uses. However, the parameters provided in Table 5-10 are anticipated to encompass most development scenarios. The land uses have been selected as conservative estimates and are likely the most intensive uses for the Project Site in order to evaluate a scenario that produces the highest level of impact to be analyzed in this environmental document. Once this alternative is completely built-out, there would be an increase in traffic associated with the development and an increase in water use and wastewater generated. Traffic levels are estimated based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. Water use rates are based on water use factors provided by the City Utilities Department. Table 5-12 shows the estimated water use, wastewater, and the traffic generated for this alternative at build- out in an estimated 25 years. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-28 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-12 Estimated Traffic, Water Use and Wastewater - County Development Plan Development Type Floor Area square feet) Weekday Average Daily One Way Trips Weekend Average Daily One Way Trips Water Use af/year) Wastewater gals/day) Business Park (Offices) 249,000 2,844 408 16.4 10,269 Printing and Publishing 10,000 70 13 0.7 570 Hotel (115 room) 70,000 572 573 49.5 30,900 Specialized Education /Training Facility 5,000 137 56 0.3 206 Light Manufacturing 50,000 191 75 3.6 2,852 Industrial Research and Development 50,000 406 95 5.0 3,124 General Retail 15,000 644 750 0.1 96 Vehicle Services Repair and Maintenance -Major 10,000 316 159 0.3 187 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital, Boarding, Large Animals 5,000 220 440 1.0 803 Photo and Film Processing Lab 10,000 70 13 0.7 444 Warehousing, Indoor Storage 40,000 100 93 1.2 828 Wholesaling and Distribution 48,000 335 63 1.4 994 Wastewater Treatment 1 acres 27 14 1.4 62 Recreational Fields 15 acres 69 867 21.0 937 5. Recreational Fields and Wastewater Treatment facility area numbers are in acres. 6. Trip Generation Rates from ITE 8th Edition except Specialized Education from San Diego Association of Governments Rates. 7. Recreational field traffic numbers based upon 90 persons per weekday and 1,300 persons per weekend. 8. Water Use and Wastewater factors based on City of SLO Utilities Department. af-acre-feet 5.1.4 Transportation Alternatives The AASP, which was adopted by the City of San Luis Obispo to guide development in the area around the San Luis Obispo Airport, includes a number of roads to serve future development on the Project Site. Under the full City build out of the Airport and Margarita areas, the project would contribute to an existing significant unavoidable traffic impact. The transportation alternatives discussed below were evaluated to determine if they could reduce the level of severity of the significant traffic impact. The Unocal Collector Road would have passed through the northwestern portion of the Project Site and was intended to serve development in this portion of the Project Site. The location of the Unocal Collector Road is shown in Figure 5-7. The AASP assumed that a considerable amount of development would occur in the northwest corner of the Project Site (see Figure 5-3). However, the development Project proposed by the Applicant has substantially less development on the western portion of the Project Site. The Applicant reduced the development in the northwestern potions of the site since the majority of this area is within the 100-year flood plain, and contains large areas of sensitive wetlands including VPFS habitat, which is a federally endangered species. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-29 Figure 5-7 Location of Transportation Alternatives 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-30 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Given the limited development on the western portion of the Project Site, the Applicant has not proposed to construct the Unocal Collector Road as part of the proposed Project. Given that this road is part of the AASP, the EIR has included construction of this road as an alternative. The other major road in the AASP is the extension of Prado Road from its current terminus east to the intersection with Broad Street, along with the completion of Santa Fe Road north to the intersection with Prado Road. Figure 5-7 shows the location of these two roads. The proposed Project includes extending Santa Fe Road north from Tank Farm Road as far as the northern Project Site boundary. This portion of Santa Fe Road would be used by the proposed development to access Tank Farm Road. The Applicant is not proposing to extend Santa Fe Road north of the Project Site. The extension of Prado Road is a major transportation goal of the City. Completion of this road is critical to the development of the Margarita Area, and is part of the Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP). Prado Road would provide the primary access to the Margarita area from other parts of the city, and would connect the southeastern and southwestern parts of the city (MASP, 2004). The City Circulation Element designates Prado Road as a “highway/regional route.” A basic concept of the neighborhood design for the Margarita area would have most of the vehicle traffic between the southeastern and southwestern parts of the community, as well as trips to and from the neighborhood, carried by Prado Road as a “regional route,” with design features of a “parkway arterial” (MASP, 2004). As discussed in the MASP, the Prado Road improvements and a portion of the cost of Prado Interchange, and intersection improvements at Prado and South Higuera would be allocated to future development in the Margarita Area since this area would benefit from these improvements. Improvements to Tank Farm Road, the Unocal Collector, Santa Fe Road, and the Buckley Extension would be allocated to future development in the Airport Area since this area primarily would benefit from them (MASP, 2004). Given the importance of the Prado Road extension to the development in the Margarita and Airport areas it has been evaluated for inclusion as an alternative in this EIR. Each of these transportation alternatives is discussed below. 5.1.4.1 Unocal Collector Road This alternative would involve the installation of the Unocal Collector Road from Tank Farm Road to Prado Road with two (2) lanes, consistent with the AASP. As part of this alternative, a roundabout would be installed where the Unocal Collector Road intersects with Prado Road. This road would be about 0.65 miles in length, of which about 0.35 miles would be on or bordering the Project Site. The remainder of the Road would be on property that is not owned by the Applicant, north of the Project Site. This alternative would require approximately 15 feet of engineered fill in the northwest corner of the Project Site to get the Unocal Collector Road above the 100-year flood plain. The amount of structural fill required has been estimated at about 50,000 cubic yards. This assumes a road width of 59 feet. The remainder of the road would need about 15,000 cubic yards of engineered fill. A 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-31 number of large box culverts would need to be installed under the road to allow for the flow of surface waters in the northwest area of the Project Site. Construction of the road would impact about three acres of wetland on the Project Site, of which about two acres would be VPFS habitat. In addition, about 0.25 miles of the road would pass through land that is currently used for grazing and row crops. All other aspects of the proposed remediation and development Project would remain the same as the proposed Project under this alternative. 5.1.4.2 Prado Road Extension This alternative would involve extension of Prado Road from its current terminus to Broad Street with two (2) lanes (about 0.5 miles), completion of Santa Fe Road from Tank Farm Road to Prado Road with two (2) lanes (the majority of the Santa Fe extension is part of the proposed Project (see Figure 5-7), and the installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Santa Fe and Prado Road. More information on the construction of Prado Road can be found in the MASP. Under this alternative, the Applicant would participate in funding the Prado Road extension along with other property owners along the Prado Road alignment in lieu of widening Tank Farm Road to four lanes west of Santa Fe as part of earlier phases. The remainder of Tank Farm Road would not be widened until Phase 3 of the development Project. Building of the extension of Prado Road would allow reduce traffic on Tank Farm Road, which would eliminate the need to complete the widening of Tank Farm Road prior to Phase 3 of the development. The City’s plan for the Prado Road extension is to build it concurrently with development of the Margarita Area. The respective properties would dedicate all right-of-way for the road in fee and also dedicate access control at the time of development. During initial development of the Margarita Area, the developers would construct or fund the construction of the two lanes of roadway, one bike path, and one sidewalk with street lighting. Because the City could only ask for “fair share” funding from the Applicant for this Project, it is not entirely clear that funding from the Margarita Area developers would be available in a timeframe that would allow this alternative to be implemented as part of the Phase I Project development. This alternative would only be feasible if Prado Road could be completed prior to the start of the Phase I development. 5.1.5 Other County Development Alternatives Two alternatives were identified that would apply to the County Development Plan only. Each one is discussed below. City Water Water for the proposed County Development Plan would be provided by a number of onsite groundwater wells. An alternative would be for the Applicant to contract with the City of San Luis Obispo Utility Department to provide water from the City. This would be the source of water for the City Development Plan. With this alternative, all water for the County development would be provided by the City City Sewer Wastewater for the proposed County Development Plan would be handled by a new onsite wastewater treatment facility. An alternative would be for the Applicant to contract with the City 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-32 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR of San Luis Obispo Utility Department to provide sewer service from the City. This would be the same method of handling wastewater for the City Development Plan. With this alternative, all wastewater for the County development would be sent to the City sewer system, and no onsite wastewater treatment facility would need to be built. 5.2 Alternatives Screening Analysis This section presents a screening analysis of the alternatives. The screening analysis has been used to determine which of the alternatives discussed above could meet the following criteria and be carried forward for further analysis in the EIR. The alternative is technically feasible; The alternative would lessen the potentially significant impacts of the proposed project or substantially reduce other environmental impacts of the proposed project; and The alternative would attain most of the basic objectives of the project. The following sections discuss the screening analysis for each of these groups of alternatives. 5.2.1 Remediation Alternatives Table 5-13 (which is just before end of Section 5.2.1) summarizes the screening analysis for the remediation alternatives and identifies the issue areas where impacts would increase or decrease relative to the proposed Project. The ratings of the various alternatives provided in Table 5-13 were developed based upon a review of the alternative description information provided above, and an assessment of the level of impacts that would occur if these alternatives were implemented. The impacts identified for each of the alternatives were then compared to the proposed Project to determine if the impact was greater or less than the proposed Project. The information in Table 5-13 was used as part of the screening analysis to determine which alternatives should be carried forward for further analysis in the EIR. The following sections summarize the results of this screening analysis for each of the remediation alternatives. Mass Excavation This alternative would not eliminate or reduce any of the significant impacts identified for the proposed Project. As discussed in Table 5-13, this alternative would substantially increase the impacts associated with remediation in almost all issue areas due to an increase in excavation quantities from approximately 196,000 cubic yards to approximately 2,500,000 cubic yards of affected soil. In addition, the grading surface area would increase from about 135 acres to about 187 acres, and the amount of fill that would need to be imported would increase from about 82,000 cubic yards to about 2,000,000 cubic yards. The air emissions would be expected to increase by at least a factor of ten when compared to the proposed Project, which would be a significant unavoidable (Class I) impact. The biggest increase in impacts would be to biological resources. Mass excavation would impact over 50 percent of all of the wetlands at the site, and most of the VPFS habitat. These would be significant unavoidable (Class I) impacts. This amount of excavation would likely result in the 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-33 permanent loss of on-site biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. The amount of disturbance created by this alternative most likely would preclude the on-site re-establishment of native populations of some plants and animals. Trucking impacts would be substantially greater with this alternative. Large amounts of hydrocarbon impacted material would need to be trucked from the site. In addition, large quantities of clean fill would need to be brought to the site via truck for backfilling the excavations. It is estimated that well over one million cubic yards of material would need to be trucked to or from the site. This would likely result in significant unavoidable impacts to traffic and circulation along Tank Farm Road. Mass excavation would require dewatering since most of the excavations would be deep enough to encounter groundwater. In order to complete the excavations, the groundwater would need to be removed from the excavations. This alternative would require the treatment and disposal of the water that would be removed from the excavation areas as part of the dewatering operations. This would increase the potential for impacts to surface water and groundwater quality due to the potential release of water contaminated as part of the excavation process. The proposed excavation project has been designed to avoid the need for dewatering operations. With mass excavation as much as 168,000,000 gallons of water would need to be handled and treated as part of the dewatering operations. This alternative would result in the removal of most of the hydrocarbon impacted material from the site, which would eliminate most of the human health and ecological risk. However, the remedial caps and vapor barriers, which are part of the proposed Project, would serve to reduce most of the human health and ecological risk for the site. As such, the mass excavation alternative would not substantially reduce the human health and ecological risk when compared to the proposed Project. However, with this alternative a considerable portion of the sensitive ecological and historical resources would be eliminated. As discussed in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials Section of the EIR (Section 4.11), the proposed remediation activities would reduce the level of human and ecological risk to acceptable levels. The remediation approach was developed to reduce these levels of risk without the significant ecological impacts associated with the mass excavation alternative. The goal of any Remediation Project that is occurring in sensitive habitat should be to minimize environmental impact to the extent feasible, while assuring that after remediation, the site is protective of human health and the ecology. Given that the mass excavation alternative would increase the severity of most of the remediation impacts identified for the proposed Project (e.g., air quality, biological resources, transportation and circulation, water resource, etc.), and would result in some additional significant unavoidable impacts, it has been dropped from further consideration in the EIR as a result of this screening analysis. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-34 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation This alternative would not eliminate or reduce any of the significant impacts identified for the proposed Project. As discussed in Table 5-13, this alternative would increase the impacts associated with remediation in most issue areas because it would increase in excavation quantities from approximately 196,000 cubic yards to approximately 558,000 cubic yards of affected soil. In addition, the grading surface area would increase from about 135 acres to about 148 acres, and the amount of fill that would need to be imported would increase from about 82,000 cubic yards to about 226,000 cubic yards. Total air emissions would be expected to increase by about 80% when compared to the proposed Project, because of the increase excavation quantities, which would be a significant unavoidable Class I) impact. There would be an increase in impacts to biological resources. Partial excavation increase impacts to wetlands at the Project Site by about two acres. Impacts to VPFS habitat would increase by about one acre. Trucking impacts would be greater with this alternative than for the proposed Project. Increased quantities of NHIS would need to be removed from the site during excavation and trucked to the Santa Maria Landfill. In addition, clean fill would need to be brought to the site via truck for backfilling the excavations. It is estimated that about 784,000 cubic yards of material would need to be trucked to or from the site, compared with 278,000 cubic yards for the proposed Project. This would increase traffic and circulation impacts along Tank Farm Road compared to the proposed Project. Remedial cap replacement with excavation would require dewatering since some of the excavations would be deep enough to encounter groundwater. In order to complete the excavations the groundwater would need to be removed from the excavations. Approximately 29,000,000 gallons of water would need to be removed, and this water would have to be treated and disposal of at the site. This would increase the potential for impacts to surface water and groundwater quality due to potential releases of water that has been contaminated as part of the excavation process. The proposed excavation Project has been designed to avoid the need for dewatering operations. This alternative would result in the removal of more of the hydrocarbon impacted material from the site than the proposed Project. However, the level of human health and ecological risk would remain essentially the same as for the proposed Project. The main reason for this is that with the proposed Project these areas would be capped with clean soil/gravel and vapor barriers would be installed. These remedial methods would provide essentially the same levels of protection and risk reduction as excavation based upon the type of contamination at the Project Site (mainly crude oil components, and arsenic). This alternative is another approach to meeting the cleanup goals of the proposed project. It is also an alternative that has been raised as part of the EIR scoping process, over concerns with the level of remediation associated with the proposed Project. For these reasons, this alternative has been selected for further evaluation in the EIR. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-35 Table 5-13 Comparison of Remediation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Mass Excavation Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation IC and Monitoring Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. Aesthetics/Visual + + - The remediation activities associated with the mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation alternatives would be considerably longer in duration and would involve substantially more excavations and moving of material, and construction equipment on the site. This would increase the impacts to visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. With institutional controls and long-term monitoring essentially no remediation activities would occur as the site and the duration of the activities would be considerably less than the proposed Project. This would reduce the impacts to visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Air Quality + + - Both the mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation alternatives would generate substantially more air emissions than the proposed Project. This would include all types of emissions including GHG emissions, and toxic air emissions. With institutional controls and long-term monitoring considerably less emissions would be generated since less construction equipment and activities would occur. Agricultural - 0 + With mass excavation most of the impacted material at the site would be removed, but some would still remain. This might reduce the potential for future impact to surrounding agricultural uses over the proposed Project as a result of contamination migration via groundwater. However, long-term groundwater monitoring at the site indicates that the contamination is not migrating via groundwater. With the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative impacted material would still remain on site that could impact surrounding agricultural uses. This alternative would not be substantially different that the propose Project. With institutional controls and long-term monitoring essentially no impacted material would be removed from the site. This might increase the potential for 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-36 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-13 Comparison of Remediation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Mass Excavation Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation IC and Monitoring Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. future impact to surrounding agricultural uses over the proposed Project as a result of contamination migration via groundwater. However, long-term groundwater monitoring at the site indicates that the contamination is not migrating via groundwater. Biological Resources + construction) 0 ecological risk) construction) 0 ecological risk) construction) ecological risk) Both mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation would have greater impacts to wetlands and habitat for listed, special and endangered species that the proposed Project. Mass excavation would impact more than half of all the wetlands at the site and would impact major portions of VPFS habitat. Both of these alternatives would result in permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. The amount of disturbance created by these two alternatives could preclude the on-site re-establishment of native populations of plants and animals. Both the mass excavation and remedial cap replacement with excavation alternatives would result in the similar ecological risk as the proposed Project since the combination of excavations and capping associated with the proposed Project eliminate most of this risk. With institutional controls and long-term monitoring essentially no remediation activities would occur as the site and there would be minimal impacts to wetlands and habitat for listed, special and endangered species. The ecological risk would be greater for this alternative since no excavation or capping of impacted areas would occur. Cultural Resources + + - The impacts to historic resources would be greater with the mass excavation alternative than the proposed Project. Most of the historic resources at the site would be severely impacted with mass excavation. The potential for encountering unknown cultural resources during mass excavation would be greater due to the increased amount of ground disturbance. The potential for encountering unknown archaeological resources during excavation in place of remedial caps would be greater since there would be 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-37 Table 5-13 Comparison of Remediation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Mass Excavation Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation IC and Monitoring Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. more ground disturbance. There would be no impacts to historic or cultural resources with the institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative since no earth moving would occur as part of this alternative. Geological and Soil Resources The potential for erosion-induced siltation of nearby creeks would be increase with both the mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation alternatives when compared to the proposed Project since more excavations and earthmoving activities would occur. The potential for erosion-induced siltation of nearby creeks would be substantially less with the institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative when compared to the proposed Project since there would be no earthmoving activities. Hazards/ Hazardous Materials 0 health risk) traffic risk) 0 health risk) traffic risk) health risk) traffic risk) The residual heath risk remaining after site remediation would be similar to the proposed Project with the mass excavation and remedial cap replacement with excavation alternatives. The main reason for this is that with the proposed Project areas would be capped with clean soil/gravel and vapor barriers would be installed. These remedial methods would provide essentially the same levels of protection and risk reduction as excavation based upon the type of contamination at the Project Site (mainly crude oil components, and arsenic). Truck traffic risks would increase with mass excavation and remedial cap replacement with excavation alternatives due to the increase in truck traffic associated with transporting impacted and clean material to and from the site. The human health risk would be greater for the institutional controls alternative since no excavation or capping of impacted areas would occur thereby increasing the potential for exposure. Truck traffic risks would be much less for this alternative since no remediation activities would occur. Noise/Vibration + + - The noise and vibration levels associated with the full and remedial cap 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-38 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-13 Comparison of Remediation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Mass Excavation Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation IC and Monitoring Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. replacement with excavation alternatives would be greater than for the proposed Project due to increase in construction related equipment. In particular, sheet pile drivers would be needed to conduct most of the excavations, which are major noise generators. In both cases the noise and vibration associated with the blasting of the flower mound would still occur. The noise and vibration levels would be considerably less with the institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative no earth moving would occur as part of this alternative. Population and Housing 0 0 - While the mass excavation and remedial cap replacement with excavation alternatives would require more workers, the population and housing impacts for these alternatives would be similar to the proposed Project. No construction workers would be required for the institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative since no remediation activities would occur. Public Services/Utilities + + - Both the mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation alternatives would use considerably more nonrenewable energy than the proposed Project due to the increase number of diesel construction equipment required. The increased traffic associated with the increase truck transport of impacted material and fill to and from the site would increase the potential for interference with emergency and fire protection services along Tank Farm Road. Both of the excavation alternatives would increase the amount of material that would have to be disposed of in landfills due to the increased removal of impacted material from the Project Site. The institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative would reduce the amount of nonrenewable energy, traffic, and landfill disposal compared to the proposed Project because there would be no remedial activities associated with the alternative. Recreation 0 0 - While the mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation alternatives would require more workers, the recreational impacts for these 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-39 Table 5-13 Comparison of Remediation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Mass Excavation Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation IC and Monitoring Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. alternatives would be similar to the proposed Project. No construction workers would be required for the institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative since no remediation activities would occur. Transportation/ Circulation + + - Truck traffic associated with the mass excavation alternative would be substantially greater than for the proposed Project due to the large amount of impacted material and fill that would need to be transported to and from the Project Site. This increased truck traffic would impact Tank Farm Road, as well as all the roads associated with the route to the Santa Maria Landfill. With the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative there would be an increase in truck traffic over the proposed Project since more impacted material and fill would have to be transported to and from the Project Site. This would primarily impact Tank Farm Road. The institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative would not generate much in the way of truck traffic since no remedial activities would occur. The only traffic would be associated with monitoring activities. As such, the impacts would be less than the proposed Project. Water Resources + + - The potential for pollution runoff would be greater than the proposed Project for both the mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation alternatives. In both cases, the excavations would involve the handling of contaminated groundwater as well as large quantities of impacted soil. This increase in handling of affected material would increase the potential for pollution runoff. The amount of water needed for dust control and other remediation activities would increase over the proposed Project for both the excavation alternatives. This would increase the potential to interfere with local groundwater recharge. With the mass excavation alternative, massive grading would be needed that could affect surface water flows thereby increasing surface water runoff. This impact could be greater with mass excavation than with the proposed Project just do to the amount of grading that 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-40 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-13 Comparison of Remediation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Mass Excavation Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation IC and Monitoring Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. would be needed as part of the excavation process. The institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative would not have much of an effect on water resources since no remedial activities would occur. As such, the impacts would be less than the proposed Project. Wastewater + + - The mass excavation and replacement of remedial caps with excavation alternatives would generate much larger quantities of wastewater that the proposed Project due to the need to dewater the excavation areas. The proposed Project has been designed to avoid the need to dewater as part of the remediation process. The wastewater from dewatering would have to be treated prior to discharge. However, given the large volume of water that would have to be treated there would be an increase risk of releases of contaminated water that could impact surface and groundwater quality. The institutional controls and long-term monitoring alternative would have minimal impact on wastewater since no remedial activities would occur. Some limited amount of wastewater could be generated from the monitoring activities that would occur at the site. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-41 Institutional Controls and Long-Term Monitoring Only This alternative would result in no remediation activities, which would substantially reduce or eliminate most of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Remediation Project. However, the level of human health and ecological risk would not be reduced to acceptable levels under this alternative. The development portion of the Project would not be able to proceed due to unacceptable levels of human health and ecological risk. In addition, the Surface Evaluation, Remediation, and Restoration Team (SERRT), which include a number of governmental agencies, rejected this type of remediation for the Project Site. This alternative would also not meet any of the objectives of the proposed Project. Given that this level of remediation would not be acceptable to the RWQCB and other governmental agencies, and that it would not meet any of the objectives of the Project, it has been dropped from further consideration in the EIR. 5.2.2 Development Alternatives Table 5-14 (which is before the end of Section 5.2.2) summarizes the screening analysis for the development alternatives and identifies the issue areas where impacts would increase or decrease relative to the proposed Project. The ratings of the various alternatives provided in Table 5-14 were developed based upon a review of the alternative description information provided above, and an assessment of the level of impacts that would occur if these alternatives were implemented. The impacts identified for each of the alternatives were then compared to the proposed Project to determine if the impact was greater or less than the proposed Project. The information in Table 5-14 was used as part of the screening analysis to determine which alternatives should be carried forward for further analysis in the EIR. The following sections summarize the results of this screening analysis for each of the development alternatives. Residential Development This alternative would reduce a number of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, including the Class I development impacts associated with air emission and traffic at a number of intersections. However, impacts associated with noise and hazards would increase due to the proximity of the residential development to the Airport. In addition, residential development of this site would not be consistent with the AASP or the County General Plan, both of which have this area zoned for commercial service and business type development. Residential development would also not meet any of the development objectives of the Project. In addition, given the very limited residential development that would be allowed by the ALUP 66 single family homes on the entire Project Site), it is likely that this type of development would not be economically feasible. For these reasons, this alternative has been dropped from further consideration in the EIR. Development Consistent with AASP This alternative would not reduce the severity or eliminate any of the impacts of the proposed Project. This alternative would result in the development of a very similar amount of building square footage, and land use mix as the proposed Project. The main difference would be the location of the development on the Project Site. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-42 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR With this alternative a large portion of the development would be shifted from the northeast corner to the northwest corner of the Project Site. The northwest corner of the site is within the 100-year flood plain and contains wetland and VPFS habitat, as well as other sensitive biological resources. Placing development on this portion of the site would result in an increase in impacts to air quality, biological resources, water resources, and historic resources. As shown in Figure 4-3, portions of the areas zoned for development would be within the Runway Protection Zone RPZ). The ALUP would prohibit development of structures in this area, At the time the AASP was developed by the City, many of the biological and hydrological field studies of the site were not available. Had these studies been available, it is likely that development would not have been proposed for this northwest area of the site. In developing their Project, the Applicant had an extensive amount of field data and was able to place development in areas of the site that would avoid impacts to sensitive biological resources. Given that this alternative would not reduce or eliminate any of the impacts of the proposed Project, and would result in increased impacts in a number of issue areas, it has been dropped from further consideration in the EIR. Development Consistent with County General Plan This alternative would not reduce the severity or eliminate any of the impacts of the proposed Project. This alternative would result in the development of a very similar amount of building square footage, and land use mix as the proposed Project. The main difference would be the location of the development on the Project Site. With this alternative a large portion of the development would be shifted from the southeast corner to the northwest corner of the Project Site. The northwest corner of the site is within the 100-year flood plain and contains wetland and VPFS habitat, as well as other sensitive biological resources. Placing development on this portion of the site would result in an increase in impacts to air quality, biological resources, water resources, and historic resources. At the time the General Plan was developed by the County, many of the biological and hydrological field studies of the site were not available. Had these studies been available, it is likely that development would not have been proposed for this northwest area of the site. In developing their Project, the Applicant had an extensive amount of field data and was able to place development in areas of the site that would avoid impacts to sensitive biological resources. Given that this alternative would not reduce or eliminate any of the impact of the proposed Project, and would result in increased impacts in a number of issue areas, it has been dropped from further consideration in the EIR. Reduced Development This alternative would reduce the severity of a number of the impacts of the proposed Project; however it would only eliminate one of the significant (Class I) impacts associated with the Project. This alternative was designed to reduce the Diesel PM Class I impact to a level of insignificance with mitigation (Class II). 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-43 Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. Aesthetics/Visual - 0 0 - With the residential development alternative only about 25 acres of the property would be developed. This would reduce the level of impacts to visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings compared to the proposed Project. Also, typically residential homes are not as large as commercial and business park facilities, which would serve to further reduce the impacts to visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. With the AASP and General Plan development alternatives, the amount of development would be very close to the proposed Project. As such, the impacts to the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings would essentially be the same as for the proposed Project. With the reduced development alternative, about 30 % less square footage of building space would be constructed, and no development would occur on the western portion of the Project Site. This would result in a slight reduction in the impacts to visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings compared to the proposed Project. Air Quality - + construction) 0 development) construction) 0 development) The air emissions associated with pad grading would be less with the residential development than the proposed Project since few areas of development would occur. The air emissions associated with the operation of the residential development would be less than for the proposed Project. If one assumes an average of three persons per household, then the total occupation would be less than 100 people, which is significantly less than for the proposed Project. This lower occupancy coupled with the lower level of square footage development would significantly reduce operational air emissions compared to the proposed Project. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-44 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. Both the AASP and the General Plan development alternatives would require substantial grading and pad development in the northwest corner of the site due the fact that this area is within the 100-year flood plan. This would increase construction air emissions over what is projected for the proposed Project. With the AASP and General Plan development alternatives, the amount of development would be very close to the proposed Project. As such, the impacts to air quality from operations would essentially be the same as for the proposed Project. With the reduced development alternative, the amount of building square footage would be reduced by about 30%. This would reduce the overall air emissions associated with operations by about 30%. While the development pad on the west side of the property would not be built, this change would not affect the peak day or peak quarter air emissions for remediation. Agricultural 0 0 0 0 The impacts to agricultural resources are primarily due to the remediation activities and not related to the development. As such, the impacts to agricultural resources would be expected to be the same for all of the development alternatives. Biological Resources 0 + + 0 The impacts to biological resources are primarily due to the remediation activities and not related to the development. With the residential and reduced development alternatives the level of biological impacts would remain the same as for the proposed Project. With the AASP and General Plan development alternatives additional grading that would be needed in the northwest portion of the site. This area is currently within the 100-year 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-45 Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. flood plain and would require substantial fill to allow for development. This fill and grading would impact additional wetlands, VPFS habitat, and sensitive plant species habitat. This would increase biological impacts for these alternatives over the proposed Project. Cultural Resources 0 + + 0 The impacts to cultural and historic resources are primarily due to the remediation activities and not related to the development. However, with the AASP and General Plan development alternatives a number of historic sites associated with past oil operations would have to be removed due to the increased development in the Northwest corner of the site. This would increase the impacts to historic resources compared to the proposed Project. Geological and Soil Resources 0 0 0 0 The geological impacts of development are primarily associated with impacts due to inadequate design of fill areas and pads that would be used for development. These same impacts would apply to all of the development alternatives and the level of impact would be similar to that for the proposed Project. Hazards/ Hazardous Materials 0 0 0 The residential development would place homes within the airport safety zones. While limited residential development is allowed in these safety zones, they would subject homes to increase risk of airport hazards. In addition, while the homes would be placed on areas of the site that do not have contamination, there would still be an increase in exposure risk for the residential properties. The AASP, General Plan and reduced development alternatives would be expected to have similar hazard and hazardous material impacts as the proposed Project since they would all involve developing similar total acreage at the site. With the AASP and General Plan alternatives the recreational ball fields would not be built, which could reduce the potential for aircraft 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-46 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. wildlife strikes when compared to the proposed Project. However, this would be a minor reduction compared to that associated with the increase in wetland acreage that would result as part of the Remediation Project. Noise/Vibration + 0 0 0 The residential development alternative would subject homes to increase levels of noise from aircraft operations at the airport. This would be considered a more severe impact than for the proposed Project since the development would be residential. Peak hourly construction noise would be similar to the proposed project, but the duration of the construction noise would be less since it would take less time to build the residential development than the proposed Project. The AASP, General Plan and reduced development alternatives would be expected to have similar noise impacts as the proposed Project since they would all involve developing similar total acreage at the site, and the types of development would be similar. With the reduced development alternative, the duration of the construction noise would be less since it would take less time to build out this smaller development. However, the peak hourly noise levels from construction would be the same for this alternative as the proposed Project, so the construction noise impacts would be similar to the proposed Project. Population and Housing - 0 0 0 The residential development alternative would not include any new business development and therefore, would not induce growth in the labor market that would increase demand for housing. This alternative would provide additional housing. The AASP and General Plan development alternatives would be expected to have similar population and housing impacts as the 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-47 Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. proposed Project since they would all involve developing similar total building square footage at the site, and the types of development would be similar. While the amount of building square footage would be less with the reduced development alternative, the potential for impacts to growth of jobs would be expected to be similar to the proposed Project. Public Services/Utilities - 0 0 - With the residential development alternative fewer people would occupy the site. This would result in a substantial reduction in water use, energy use, and solid waste generation compared to the proposed Project even though the homes would be used 24-hrs per day. The population difference between the proposed Project and the residential development alternative is more than an order of magnitude. The AASP and General Plan development alternatives would be expected to have similar public services and utility impacts as the proposed Project since they would all involve developing similar total building square footage at the site, and the types of development would be similar. The amount of building square footage would be about 30% less with the reduced development alternative. This would reduce the water use, energy use, and solid waste generation by about the same percentages compared to the proposed Project. Recreation + + + 0 With the residential, AASP, and General Plan development alternatives, the recreational ball fields would not be constructed. This would eliminate the beneficial recreational impacts associated with the proposed Project. The reduced development alternative would include the 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-48 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. recreational ball fields so the recreational impacts would be the same as for the proposed Project. Transportation/ Circulation 0 0 - The residential development would generate lower traffic volumes as compared to the proposed Project. This would reduce the severity of traffic impacts associated with the proposed development. The AASP and General Plan development alternatives would involve developing similar total building square footage at the site, as well as a similar mix of land use types. This would mean that these alternatives would generate a similar level and mix of traffic. However, more of the traffic would be on the northwest side of the site which would make construction of the Unocal Collector Road to Prado Road critical to avoiding additional impacts to Tank Farm Road. The reduced development alternative would result in a reduction of traffic volumes by about 30% over the proposed Project. This would reduce severity of traffic impacts when compared to the proposed Project. Water Resources - + construction) 0 development) construction) 0 development) Water use for residential development under the City Plan would use water from the City Utilities. The amount of water used would be reduced by on an order of magnitudes compared to the proposed Project due to fewer people and less development areas. Water use for the residential development under the County plan would be provided by onsite groundwater wells. The amount of water needed would be reduced by over an order of magnitude compared to the proposed Project. This reduction in groundwater use would also reduce the potential for migration of hydrocarbons from the shallow ground water to the deep 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-49 Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. groundwater wells compared to the proposed Project. The AASP and General Plan development alternatives would result in development within the northwest corner of the Project Site. This area is within the 100-year flood plain and would require substantial amounts of fill to allow for the development of buildings. The change in contour of this area would affect the overall hydrology of the site. This northwest marsh area is a critical holding area for surface water runoff. Development in this area could result in limiting the ability to manage the surface water on site during large storm events. This would increase the potential surface water runoff impacts compared to the proposed Project. Water use of the AASP and General Plan development alternatives would b similar to that for the proposed Project since the development square footage would be about the same. Water use for the reduced development alternative under the County plan would be provided by onsite groundwater wells. The amount of water needed would be reduced by about 30%. This reduction in groundwater use would provide a slight reduction in the impacts to groundwater when compared to the proposed Project. Wastewater - 0 0 - Wastewater from the residential development under the County plan would be provided by an onsite wastewater treatment facility. The amount of wastewater generated would be reduced by over an order of magnitude compared to the proposed Project since few people would be occupying the site. This reduction in wastewater would reduce the wastewater impacts over that for the proposed Project. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-50 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-14 Comparison of Development Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Residential Development AASP Development General Plan Development Reduced Development Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts (+) or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. The AASP and General Plan development alternatives would be expected to have similar wastewater impacts as the proposed Project since they would all involve developing similar total building square footage at the site, and the types of development would be very similar. The amount of building square footage would be about 30% less with the reduced development alternative. This would reduce the wastewater generation by the Project by about the same percentage. This would result in a slight reduction in wastewater impacts associated with the City and County development. With the County development the onsite wastewater treatment facility would have to handle less wastewater than the proposed Project since less building square footage would be developed. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-51 The reduction in impact severity would be driven by the overall reduction in the amount of development that would occur on the Project Site. Under this alternative the building square footage would be reduced to 562,000 square feet under both the City and County Development Plans. This alternative would reduce air emission, visual, traffic, water resources (County plan only), wastewater (County plan only), and utility/public services impacts when compared to the proposed Project. Some of these impact were identified as significant and unavoidable (Class I) for the proposed Project (air emissions and traffic). While this alternative would reduce the severity of these impacts it is likely they would still be significant Class I impacts for all but the Diesel PM impact, which would be Class II. Given that this alternative has the potential for reducing the severity of some of the significant impacts identified for the proposed Project, and eliminating the Class I impact for Diesel PM it has been selected for further analysis in the EIR. 5.2.3 Transportation Alternatives Table 5-15 (which is just before the end of Section 5.2.3) summarizes the screening analysis for the transportation alternatives and identifies the issue areas where impacts would increase or decrease relative to the proposed Project. The ratings of the various alternatives provided in Table 5-15 were developed based upon a review of the alternative description information provided above, and an assessment of the level of impacts that would occur if these alternatives were implemented. The impacts identified for each of the alternatives were then compared to the proposed Project to determine if the impact was greater or less than the proposed Project. The information in Table 5-15 was used as part of the screening analysis to determine which alternatives should be carried forward for further analysis in the EIR. The following sections summarize the results of this screening analysis for each of the transportation alternatives. Unocal Collector Road This alternative would not reduce or eliminate any impacts associated with the proposed Project. Implementation of this alternative would require the construction of new roads and would not eliminate any element of the proposed Project. As such, all of the impacts associated with the road construction and operation would be in addition to the impacts identified for the proposed Project. The biggest drawback to this alternative would be the biological impacts associated with constructing the road through wetland and VPFS habitat in the northwest area of the Project Site. Also, a considerable amount of fill would need to be transported to the site to build the road through the Project Site. This fill would be needed because the road would be constructed within the 100-year flood plain. This would result in increased air emissions from construction and could impact the overall hydrology of the site since the north marsh wetlands are a key water retention area for controlling runoff during large storm events. This alternative has been considered since the roadway was part of the AASP. However the roadway is not in the City’s 1994 Circulation Element. While the Unocal Collector Road would improve access to the western parcel of the proposed Project and serve as an additional connection to Prado Road, its construction would not eliminate or reduce any identified transportation impacts due to the relatively low volumes of traffic it would serve. This is because very little of the proposed development would occur on the western portion of the Project Site. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-52 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Given that this alternative roadway would not result in eliminating or reducing any of the identified transportation impacts associated with the proposed Project, and would result in additional impacts to a number of issues areas, it has been dropped from further consideration in the EIR as a result of this screening analysis. Prado Road Extension This alternative would extend Prado Road from its current terminus to Broad Street as a two-lane facility (this would provide a new connection from South Higuera Street to Broad Street), and extend Santa Fe Road as a two-lane facility from the northern edge of the Project Site to Prado Road. These improvements would occur as a part of Phase 1 or Phase II of the Project. Widening of Tank Farm Road would be deferred to a later stage of the project development under this alternative. A roundabout would be constructed at the intersection of Santa Fe and Prado Roads. The extension of Prado Road is a major transportation goal of the City. Completion of this road is critical to the development of the Margarita Area, and is part of the Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP). Prado Road would provide the primary access to the Margarita area from other parts of the city, and would connect the southeastern and southwestern parts of the city (MASP, 2004). The City Circulation Element designates Prado Road as a “highway/regional route.” This alternative was evaluated using Average Daily Traffic (ADT) estimates, which are compared to standard daily roadway capacities to determine the number of lanes required on a roadway segment. Caltrans publishes standard ADT capacities for different facilities. Using these standard capacities, the LOS D threshold for a Class I 2-lane divided arterial is 17,325 daily vehicles. The existing ADT on Tank Farm Road between South Higuera Street and Santa Fe Road is 18,400 vehicles. The extension of Prado Road would provide drivers with an alternative route parallel to Tank Farm Road early in project development and would remove vehicles from Tank Farm Road. The amount of traffic expected to shift from Tank Farm Road to the extended Prado Road was estimated using the City’s Travel Demand Model. The model showed that the extension of Prado Road lowered the ADT on Tank Farm Road by 27% from 18,400 to 13,400 vehicles daily. The model showed a commensurate increase in volume on Prado Road, as drivers shifted to the new parallel route. The proposed Project would generate 8,193 daily vehicle trips once pass-by trips and internalization reductions are applied. Of these trips, 35% are expected to travel on Tank Farm Road west of Santa Fe Road if the Prado Road extension is in place. This corresponds to 2,868 daily project trips on this segment, which yields an ADT of 16,268 with the Project 13,400+2,868). This is below the LOS D threshold for this facility, and is expected to provide acceptable operations. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-53 Table 5-15 Comparison of Transportation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Unocal Collector Prado Road Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. Aesthetics/Visual 0 0 The two transportation alternatives would not be expected to affect the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings when compared to the proposed Project Air Quality + construction) 0 operations) 0 construction) 0 operations) The Unocal Collector Road would increase overall construction emissions compared to the proposed Project since additional roads would need to be constructed with this alternative. In addition, fill material for the construction of the road in the northwest portion of the site would have to be trucked to the site, which would increase transportation emissions compared to the proposed Project. With the Unocal Collector Road operational emissions from transportation would remain the same as the proposed Project. The Prado Road alternative would not increase the peak quarterly air emissions for the proposed Project since the widening of Tank Farm Road would be delayed, and the emissions from these two road construction activities would not overlap. With the Prado Road extension operational emissions from transportation would remain the same as the proposed Project. Agricultural + Both of the transportation alternatives would impact additional acreage that is currently being used for agricultural operations such as grazing and row crops. This would increase the agricultural impacts for these alternatives when compared to the proposed Project. With the Prado Road alternative, the widening of Tank Farm Road would be delayed, but it would still occur as part of the project, so none of the impacts associated with this widening would be eliminated. Biological Resources + Both of the transportation alternatives would involve construction in areas that have biological resources. The Unocal Collector Road would impact additional wetland and VPFS habitat in the northwest corner of the Project Site. The Prado Road alternative would involve constructing a crossing of Acacia Creek, which contains riparian and wetland habitat. Construction of this creek crossing would likely result in impacts to biological resources. Even with the Prado Road alternative, eventually Tank Farm Road would be widened so none of the wetland impacts associated with this widening would be eliminated. Therefore, the biological impacts associated with construction would be greater for both of these alternatives when compared to the proposed Project. Cultural Resources + + Construction of the Unocal Collector Road would impact a number of historic sites on the Project Site that are associated with the past oil operations. Also, the potential for encountering unknown cultural resources would be greater with both the transportation alternative since they 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-54 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5-15 Comparison of Transportation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Unocal Collector Prado Road Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. would increase the amount of grading and ground disturbance due to the additional length of road that would need to be built. Geological and Soil Resources The construction activities associated with both the transportation alternatives would increase the potential for erosion-induced siltation of nearby creeks just due to the fact that more grading and earthmoving activities would be needed due to the additional length of road that would need to be built. Neither of these alternatives would eliminate any aspect of the proposed Project. While the Prado Road alternative would delay the widening of Tank Farm Road, it still would have to be widened as part of the proposed Project, but just at a later date. Therefore, none of the geological and soil impacts for the proposed Project would be eliminated or reduced b these alternatives. Hazards/ Hazardous Materials 0 0 The two transportation alternative would not be expected to affect the hazardous and hazardous materials impacts of the proposed Project. Noise/Vibration + + The construction of the two road alternatives would generate temporary construction noise in areas that would not be impacted by the proposed Project. With the Unocal Collector Road, the route would pass through sensitive biological habitat in the northwest corner of the site in an area that is not part of the proposed development. The increased traffic noise in this area could have an impact on wildlife in this area. The main driver for the increase noise would be due to the additional length of road that would need to be built for each of the transportation alternatives. Population and Housing 0 0 The two transportation alternatives would not be expected to affect the population and housing impacts of the proposed Project. Public Services/Utilities 0 0 The two transportation alternatives would not be expected to affect the public services and utilities impacts of the proposed Project. Recreation 0 0 The two transportation alternatives would not be expected to affect the recreational impacts of the proposed Project. Transportation/ Circulation Installation of the Unocal Collector Road would allow traffic from the western side of the development to access Prado Road, so not all of the traffic would have to use Tank Farm Road. This could reduce the traffic and circulation impacts along Tank Farm Road compared to the proposed Project. The Prado Road alternative would allow traffic from the northeast side of the development to 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-55 Table 5-15 Comparison of Transportation Alternatives with the Proposed Project Issue Area Impacts Compared to Proposed Project Comments Unocal Collector Prado Road Alternative Lessens or Avoids Impacts (–), Result in Increased or Additional Impacts or Remain About the Same (0) when compared to the Proposed Project. access Prado Road, so not all of the traffic would have to use the Southern part of San Fe Road and Tank Farm Road. This could reduce the traffic and circulation impacts along the southern parts of Santa Fe and Tank Farm Roads compared to the proposed Project. Water Resources + + The Unocal Collector Road alternative would result in construction of a road within the northwest corner of the Project Site, in an area that is not slated for development with the proposed Project. This area is within the 100-year flood plain and would require substantial amounts of fill to allow for the construction of the road. The change in contour of this area would affect the overall hydrology of the site. This northwest marsh area is a critical holding area for surface water runoff. Development in this area could result in limiting the ability to manage the surface water on site during large storm events. Therefore, the Unocal Collector Road alternative could increase the potential surface water runoff impacts compared to the proposed Project. The Prado Road alternative would involve constructing a crossing of Acacia Creek, which contains riparian and wetland habitat. Construction of this creek crossing could result in impacts to water resources from construction silt entering the creek. This creek would not be directly impacted by construction from the proposed Project. Wastewater 0 0 The two transportation alternatives would not be expected to affect the wastewater impacts of the proposed Project. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-56 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR The shift in traffic from Tank Farm Road to Prado Road would also affect intersection operations by adding turning traffic to the South Higuera Street/Prado Road intersection and lowering turning traffic at the South Higuera Street/Tank Farm Road intersection. The South Higuera Street/Prado Road intersection is projected to operate at LOS D or better with the Prado Road extension in place under Existing Plus Project conditions with its current lane configuration. The shift in traffic away from Tank Farm Road would also reduce queuing at the intersections of South Higuera Street and Broad Street with Tank Farm Road. In summary, a two-lane section of Tank Farm Road west of Santa Fe Road would provide adequate capacity under Existing Plus Project conditions if the Prado Road extension is in place. Without the Prado Road extension it would be necessary to widen Tank Farm Road to four lanes between South Higuera Street and Broad Street. Under Cumulative Conditions, it would be necessary to widen Tank Farm Road to four lanes both with and without the Project, even with the Prado Road extension in place. Under this alternative, the Applicant would participate in funding the Prado Road extension along with other property owners along the Prado Road alignment. The City’s plan for the Prado Road extension is to build it concurrently with development of the Margarita Area. The respective properties would dedicate all right-of-way for the road in fee and also dedicate access control at the time of development. During initial development of the Margarita Area, the Western Enclave developers would construct or fund the construction of the two lanes of roadway, one bike path, and one sidewalk with street lighting. Given that the City is only asking for “fair share” funding from the Applicant for this Project, it is not entirely clear that funding from the Margarita Area developers would be available in a timeframe that would allow this alternative to be implemented as part of the Phase I Project development. This alternative would only be feasible if Prado Road could be completed prior to the start of the Phase I development. As part of the traffic mitigation for the proposed Project (Impact T-5a), the City as required that the proposed Project be added to either the City’s Transportation Impact Fee program or the AASP or MASP impact fee programs, which would require the Applicant to pay an additional mitigation amount commensurate with their additional traffic impact beyond cumulative conditions. These fees would include any “fair share” for the extension of Prado Road. Since the fees for building this road extension are already addressed as a mitigation measure on the proposed Project, this alternative has not been addressed further in the EIR. 5.2.4 Other County Development Alternatives The use of City water and the sewer system have been eliminated from further consideration since they were found to be infeasible. The City has stated that water and sewer can only be provided to the Project if the development is within the City. The City would not be able to provide water and sewer to a development within the County (Dunsmore. 2013). 5.3 Environmental Analysis of Selected Alternatives Based on the screening analysis presented above, three alternatives were selected for further evaluation in the EIR. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(d) states: 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-57 The EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed Project. A matrix displaying the major characteristics and significant environmental effects of each alternative may be used to summarize the comparison. If an alternative would cause one or more significant effects in addition to those that would be caused by the Project as proposed, the significant effects of the alternative shall be discussed, but in less detail than the significant effects of the Project as proposed. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(d) as presented above, this EIR provides sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed Project and the other alternatives. It should be noted that assumptions made regarding the alternatives’ descriptions could differ from actual proposals and the analyses are not presented to a project-level of detail. Different alternative Project configurations and a project-level environmental analysis could result in different conclusions from those presented herein. The remainder of this section analyzes the environmental impacts of the selected alternatives. The alternatives selected in Section 5.2 for more detailed analysis include: The No Project Alternative; Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation; and Reduced Development; 5.3.1 No Project Alternative The Applicant’s proposed Project is to conduct remediation and restoration of the Project Site consistent with the proposed Remedial Action Plan (RAP) that has been submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and then to develop the portions of the Project Site with a mix of commercial and business park development. With the No Project Alternative, the development of the site would not occur, and the Project Site would remain as open space. However, it is likely that the RWQCB would approve the RAP or issue a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) for the Project Site to require remediation and restoration to assure protection of human health and ecological receptors. Based upon data provided in the Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA), predictive Ecological Risk Assessment (pERA), Remediation Feasibility Study, and feedback to date from the SERRT, the level of remediation under the No Project Alternative would likely be the similar to the proposed Project. For the purposes of the EIR it has been assumed that the remediation and restoration of the Project Site under the No Project Alternative would be the same as for the proposed Project. The only change would be that the remediation portion of the Project would not include the construction of the rough pads for either the proposed City or County Development Plans, and that some of the remedial caps would be thinner in depth. The restoration would also be similar to the proposed project except the areas that are proposed for development would be returned to their natural grade and revegetated. None of the proposed infrastructure improvements associated with roads would occur as part of the No Project Alternative. Only the storm water management improvements needed to support the remediation and restoration effort would be constructed on- site. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-58 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR With the No Project Alternative none of the development impacts identified for the proposed Project would occur. The No Project Alternative would not have any new environmental impacts associated with development, since none of the proposed development activities would occur. The No Project Alternative would not meet any of the development objectives of the proposed Project since none of the development would occur. The Remediation/Restoration Project under the No Project Alternative would have similar impacts as the proposed Project. The main difference between the two remediation/restoration projects would be that less fill would need in the areas that are proposed for development, such as the Northwest Operations Area and Operational Unit #3. The estimated fill quantities for the No Project Alternative are provided in Table 5-1. With the No Project Alternative, about 300,000 cubic yards less of fill material would be needed compared to the proposed Project (641,850 cubic yards for the proposed Project vs. 341,800 cubic yards for the No Project Alternative). This would reduce the amount of earth moving and overall grading activities associated with the Project. Under the No Project Alternative all of the impacts associated with the City or County Development Plans would be eliminated since no development would occur. Under the No Project Alternative the remediation/restoration impacts in the following issue areas would remain the same as for the proposed Project. Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources and Archeology, Geological and Soil Resources, Population and Housing, Recreation, and Wastewater. All of the remediation/restoration impacts and mitigation measures identified for the proposed Project in these issue areas would also apply to the No Project Alternative. The reader is referred to Chapter 4 of the EIR for a description of the remediation impacts and mitigation measures for each of the issue areas listed above. The remediation/restoration impacts associated with each of the affected issue areas are discussed below. Aesthetics and Visual Resources With the No Project Alternative the development pads would not be rough graded, and the areas would be returned to their natural grade and revegetated. This would eliminate the long-term visual impact associated with rough graded pads remaining until development occurred, which could be as much as 25-years for some of the development areas. Impact AE.1 (Visual Character or Site Quality) would remain a Class II impact for remediation/restoration, but would be reduced in severity. Mitigation measures AE-1b identified for the proposed Project would be applicable to the No Project Alternative. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-59 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Air emissions of criteria pollutants (CO, ROG, NOx, SO2, and PM) during construction would result from construction equipment with internal combustion engines (e.g., backhoes, cranes), and off-site vehicles (e.g., construction employee commuter vehicles and trucks delivering equipment and hauling materials to and from the site). With the No Project Alternative, the amount of emissions would be reduced since less site fill and grading would need to occur. Table 5-16 provides an estimate of the remediation emissions for the No Project Alternative. Table 5-16 Remediation Emissions-No Project Alternative-Mitigated PEAK DAY (lbs/day) ROG + NOx Diesel PM SLO County 483 4.6 Thresholds 137 7 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes No SB County 20.4 0.3 Combined SLOC & SBC 497 4.9 PEAK QUARTER (tons/qrtr) ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust SLO County 13.6 0.12 5.63 Thresholds 2.5 0.13 2.5 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes SB County 0.54 0 - Combined SLOC & SBC 14.1 0.12 5.63 Note: Santa Barbara County does not have a peak day or quarter threshold for construction emissions. Peak days occur at different times in SBC and SLO County. Therefore, Combined is not an addition of the individual peaks in the above table. The peak day emissions would not be expected to change with the No Project Alternative. There would be a 10 percent reduction in the peak quarterly emissions for the No Project Alternative. This reduction would also apply to the GHG and toxic emissions. Impacts AQ.1 (Construction Criteria Emissions), AQ.2 (Construction GHG Emissions), and AQ.3 (Construction Toxic Emissions) would be less than for the proposed Project. The mitigation measures identified for the proposed Project under AQ.1, AQ.2 and AQ.3 would all be applicable to the No Project Alternative. PM and diesel PM construction emission impacts would remain Class II for the No Project Alternative. Construction GHG emission impacts would remain Class III for the No Project Alternative. Construction toxic and criteria emission impacts would remain a Class II for the No Project Alternative. However, the severity of all of these impacts would be reduced compared to the proposed Project. Transportation and Circulation There would be less truck traffic associated with the No Project Alternative since less material would need to be delivered to the site. Truck trips associated with importing fill material would be eliminated (approximately 5,500 truck trips would be need to import fill for the proposed Project.). Truck trips associated with remediation/restoration under the No Project Alternative would be expected to decrease by about 12 percent. However, there would not be an expected decrease in the peak day or peak hour truck trips for the No Project Alternative. Therefore, Impact T.1 (Remediation Traffic) would be the same as for the proposed Project. The mitigation 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-60 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR measures identified for the proposed Project under T.1 would all be applicable to the No Project Alternative. Transportation and Circulation impacts would remain Class II for the No Project Alternative, but would be reduced in severity. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The No Project Alternative would result in a reduction of truck transportation compared to the proposed Project, which would serve to reduce the transportation hazards. Transportation hazards are related to those components of a project where there is the possibility of a traffic accident resulting from the increased level of traffic on the local area roadways due to the Project. This traffic hazard would primarily be associated with the truck transportation of Non- Hazardous Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil and the importation of fill material. With the No Project Alternative fill material would not need to be imported to the site. This would eliminate approximately 5,500 truck trips thereby reducing the transportation hazards. Even with this reduction in truck trips, the Impact HM.2 (Truck Traffic Risk) would be the same as for the proposed Project (Class III), but would be reduced in severity. Under the No Project alternative it is likely that the modifications to Reservoir 2 would not occur, so Impact HM.5 (Topography Changes and Aircraft Safety) would not occur, so there would be no beneficial impact. All of the other Hazards and Hazardous Material impacts identified for the proposed Remediation Project (HM.1-Health Risk, HM.3-Asbestos Exposure, and HM.4-Bird Strike Risk) would remain the same as for the proposed Project. Any mitigation measures associated with HM.1, HM.3, and HM.4 would also apply to the No Project Alternative. Public Service and Utilities A number of the remediation/restoration impacts are associated with increased traffic on local roads potentially interfering with emergency response, including fire (Impact PS/U.1) and police Impact PS/U.2). With the elimination of the imported fill truck trips (about 5,500) the No Project Alternative could potentially result in a reduction in the severity of these impacts. However, as discussed under Transportation and Circulation above, the peak hour and peak day truck trips would be expected to remain the same as for the proposed Project. Therefore, on average the traffic impacts to emergency response would be expected to decrease in severity when compared to the proposed Project, but would remain the same on the peak traffic days. Impacts PS/U.1 (Traffic Interference with Fire) and PS/U.2 (Traffic Interference with Police) would remain Class III for the No Project Alternative, but would be reduced in severity. Impact PS/U.3 (Use of Nonrenewable Resources) would reduce in severity over the proposed Project since there would be less trucking associated with the importing of soil for backfill. However, the impact would remain Class III, and any mitigation measures identified for P/U.3 would apply to this alternative. PS/U.4 (Solid Waste Generation) would remain the same as the proposed Project for the remediation portion of the No Project Alternative. Any mitigation measures associated with PS/U.4 would also apply to the No Project Alternative. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-61 Water Resources The Remediation Project would require the use of groundwater resources as a water supply for remediation and construction activities. Water would be supplied by four existing wells. With the No Project Alternative, less groundwater would be needed for dust control and compaction moisture since less grading and fill/compaction would be needed as a result of no development. However, water use for the restoration activities would increase compared to the proposed Project due to the need to restore the areas of the site that would have been development pads. Table 5-17 provides estimates of the water use for remediation/restoration under the No Project Alternative. The peak water demand under the No Project Alternative would occur in year three at approximately 145 acre-feet per year, which is just two acre-feet less than the Propose Project. In some of the outer years the water use for restoration would be greater than for the proposed Project due to the need to water more plants for restoration. Given that the reduction in remediation water use would be essentially offset by increased water use for restoration, the impacts of groundwater use would remain the same as the proposed Project for the No Project Alternative. Impact WR.2 (Use of Groundwater) would remain the same as the proposed Project Class III). Table 5-17 Estimated Water Demand for Remediation and Restoration by Year acre-feet per year)-No Project Alternative Work Use Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Remediation Dust Control 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Compaction Moisture 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Restoration Nursery 26 45 65 65 22 8 4 0 Plantings 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 Total 66 125 145 105 22 8 4 0 MRS estimates, adapted from Cleath 2003. All of the other water resources impacts associated with remediation (WR.1-Surface Water Quality, WR.3-Excavation of Contaminated Material, WR.4-Stormwater Runoff, and WR.5- Change in Surface Flows) would remain the same as for the Proposed Project. Any mitigation measures associated with WR.1, WR.3, WR.4, and WR.5 would also apply to the No Project Alternative. 5.3.2 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation With the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative, the areas of the Project Site where caps are proposed would be excavated. A more detailed description of this alternative is provided in Section 5.1.2.2. Under the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative the remediation/restoration impacts in the following issue areas would remain the same as the proposed Project. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-62 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Agricultural Resources, Population and Housing, and Recreation. All of the remediation/restoration impacts and mitigation measures identified for the proposed Project in these issue areas would also apply to the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. The reader is referred to Chapter 4 of the EIR for a description of the remediation impacts and mitigation measures for each of the issue areas listed above. The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would not affect any of the development impacts. All of the development impacts associated with the City and County Development Plans would remain the same as the proposed Project. The reader is referred to Chapter 4 of the EIR for a description of the development impacts and mitigation measures for both the City and County Development Plans. The remediation impacts associated with each of the affected issue areas are discussed below. Aesthetics and Visual Resources With the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative the remediation activities would take longer to complete and there would be more equipment at the site to handle the increase amount of excavations. Also, more NHIS material would have to be trucked from the site, and more fill would need to be brought to the site, thereby increasing the amount of truck traffic in the vicinity of the Project Site. This would increase the level and duration of impact to the visual character and quality of the Project Site and surrounding area compared to the proposed Project. Impact AE.1 (Visual Character or Site Quality) would remain a Class II impact for remediation/restoration, but would increase in severity. Mitigation measures associated with impact AE.1 for the proposed Project would apply to this alternative. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Table 5-18 provides an estimate of the remediation emissions for the Remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. Air emissions of criteria pollutants (CO, ROG, NOx, SO2, and PM) during construction would result from construction equipment with internal combustion engines (e.g., backhoes, cranes, sheet pile drivers, etc.), and off-site vehicles (e.g., construction employee commuter vehicles and trucks delivering equipment and hauling materials to and from the site). With the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative, the amount of air emissions would be increased over the proposed Project due to the following major activities: Excavation of additional impacted soil, Installation of sheet pile walls, Additional truck trips to remove impacted soil and import clean fill material, Additional grading and fill activities associated with the increase in excavations, and Excavation dewatering activities. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-63 Table 5-18 Remediation Emissions-Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation Alternative-Mitigated PEAK DAY (lbs/day) ROG + NOx Diesel PM SLO County 579.6 5.5 Thresholds 137 7 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes No SB County 24.5 0.38 Combined SLOC & SBC 596.4 5.86 PEAK QUARTER (tons/qrtr) ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust SLO County 20.4 0.18 8.4 Thresholds 2.5 0.13 2.5 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes SB County 0.8 0 - Combined SLOC & SBC 21.2 0.18 8.4 Note: Santa Barbara County does not have a peak day or quarter threshold for construction emissions. Peak days occur at different times in SBC and SLO County. Therefore, Combined is not an addition of the individual peaks in the above table. Note: Since the construction activity would last for more than 90 days, the daily thresholds would not apply (as per the SLOAPCD Handbook). The peak day emissions would increase by about 20 percent over the Proposed Project. The peak quarterly emissions would increase by about 35 percent. These increases would also apply to the GHG and toxic emissions. Impacts AQ.1 (Construction Criteria Emissions), AQ.2 (Construction GHG emissions), and AQ.3 (Construction Toxic Emissions) would be greater than for the proposed Project. The mitigation measures identified for the proposed Project under AQ.1, AQ.2 and AQ.3 would all be applicable to the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. PM and diesel PM construction emission impacts would remain Class II for the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. Construction GHG emission impacts would remain a Class III for the remedial cap replacement with excavation. Construction toxic and criteria emission impacts would remain a Class II for the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. However, the severity of all of these impacts would be increased compared to the proposed Project. Transportation and Circulation There would be greater truck traffic associated with the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative since more NHIS soil would have to be hauled from the site, and more fill material would need to be delivered. For this alternative about 52,300 truck trips would be needed for export and import of soil, compared with 18,500 for the proposed Project. In addition, the increase in excavations would result in more general construction equipment use, which would require more truck traffic to the site (i.e., delivery of sheet pile, dewatering equipment, etc.) Truck trips associated with remediation under this alternative would be expected to increase by about 34,200 trips (56,450 truck trips for this alternative vs. 22,285 for the proposed Project.) over the proposed Project. This would result in an increase in peak day truck trips from about 180 to about 215. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-64 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Given that these trips would be spread throughout the day, remediation trip generation for this alternative would still be significantly lower than the trip generation associated with the development phase of the Project. However, the heavy vehicle traffic and temporary traffic control on Tank Farm Road would potentially obstruct the flow of vehicle and bicycle traffic resulting in potentially unsafe conditions. Double trailer trucks interacting with standard commuter traffic could produce greater accident potential and the potential for roadway damage. In addition, remediation activities may overlap with the reconstruction of the Los Osos Valley Road/U.S. Highway 101 interchange, exacerbating construction impacts. Therefore, Impact T.1 (Remediation Traffic) would be greater in severity than for the proposed Project. The mitigation measures identified for the proposed Project under T.1 would all be applicable to this alternative. Traffic and circulation impacts would remain Class II for the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative, but the severity of the impact would increase. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would result in an increase in truck transportation compared to the proposed Project, which would serve to increase the transportation hazards. Total truck trips would increase by about 34,200 trips (56,450 truck trips for this alternative vs. 22,285 for the proposed Project.) over the proposed Project. Transportation hazards are related to those components of a project where there is the possibility of a traffic accident resulting from the increased level of traffic on the local area roadways due to the Project. This traffic increase would be primarily associated with increases in traffic associated with truck transportation of NHIS and the importation of fill material (about 52,300 trips for this alternative vs. 18,500 for the proposed Project). Impact HM.2 (Truck Traffic Risk) would have the same impact classification as the proposed Project (Class III), but would be increased in severity. The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would result in the removal of more of the hydrocarbon impacted material from the site. However, the level of human health and ecological risk would be essentially the same as the proposed Project. The main reason for this is that with the proposed Project these areas would be capped with clean soil/gravel and vapor barriers would be installed. These remedial methods would provide essentially the same levels of protection and risk reduction as excavation based upon the type of contamination at the Project Site (mainly crude oil components, and arsenic). Therefore, Impact HM.1-Helath Risk would remain the same as for the proposed Project (Class III). All of the other Hazards and Hazardous Material impacts identified for the proposed Remediation Project (HM.3-Asbestos Exposure, and HM.4-Bird Strike Risk) would remain the same as for the proposed Project. Any mitigation measures associated with HM.3, and HM.4 would also apply to the Remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. Public Service and Utilities A number of the remediation/restoration impacts are associated with increased traffic on local roads potentially interfering with emergency response, including fire (Impact PS/U.1) and police Impact PS/U.2). The increase in the number of truck trips associated with the remedial cap 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-65 replacement with excavation alternative could potentially increase the severity of these two impacts. The increase peak day traffic (218 for this alternative vs. 180 for the proposed Project) would be due to more construction equipment, and the need to transport more soil to and from the Project Site. Impacts PS/U.1 (Traffic Interference with Fire) and PS/U.2 (Traffic Interference with Police) would remain Class III for the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative, but would increase in severity. PS/U.3 (Use of Nonrenewable Resources) would increase in severity for this alternative compared to the proposed project due to the increase the use of diesel burning construction equipment and truck use. Increased construction equipment would be required for the additional excavations, such as sheet pile wall drivers. Additional energy use would also be required for the handling and treatment of the water from the dewatering operations. As discussed above, there would be an additional truck use associated with the increase in import and export of soil from the site. While the severity of PS/U.3 would increase, the impact would remain Class III. Mitigation measures identified for PS/U.3 for the proposed Project would apply to this alternative. PS/U.4 (Solid Waste Generation) would increase in severity over the proposed Project due to the increase in impacted soil that would need to be hauled from the site to the Santa Maria Landfill 558,000 cubic yards vs. 196,250 cubic yards for the proposed Project). While the severity of PS/U.4 would increase, the impact would remain Class III. Mitigation measures identified for PS/U.4 for the proposed Project would apply to this alternative. Geological Soil Resources The increase in excavations associated with this alternative would increase the potential for erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground disturbing activities. This alternative would require the excavation of 558,000 cubic yards of affected material, compared with 196,250 cubic yards for the proposed Project. This increase in the amount of affected material would increase the potential for erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways. Impact GR.1 (erosion-induced siltation) would increase in severity for this alternative, but would remain Class II. Mitigation measures identified for impact GR.1 under the proposed Project would apply to this alternative. Water Resources Excavations where groundwater is encountered can result in the groundwater becoming contaminated with the hydrocarbons in the excavated material. The proposed Remediation Project has been designed to avoid excavations to depths that would likely encounter groundwater. With the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative a number of the excavations would occur at depths where groundwater would be encountered. This would require the installation of sheet pile around the excavations to allow for the dewatering of the excavation sites. As groundwater appears in the excavation area it would be pumped out and processed in an onsite water treatment facility. It is estimated that about 29,000,000 gallons of water would have to be treated and disposed of with this alternative. This increase in handling of contaminated groundwater would increase the potential for impacts to surface water and groundwater quality due to potential releases of the contaminated water. Impact WR.1 (Surface Water Quality) would remain a Class II, but the severity of the potential impact would be greater than for the proposed 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-66 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Project. The mitigation measures associated with WR.1 would apply to the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. During the excavation process, contaminated material has to be removed from the excavation, stockpiled on site, and then loaded into trucks for removal. This brings the contaminated material to the surface where it has the potential to be mobilized by rain events and surface water runoff, resulting in potential impacts to the environment. The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would increase the amount of contaminated material that would need to be handled 558,000 cubic yards for this alternative vs. 196,250 for the proposed Project), which would increase the potential for generating contaminated runoff. The potential severity of Impact WR.3 Excavation of Contaminated Material) would increase for the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative when compared to the proposed Project, but the impact classification would remain the same (Class II). The mitigation measures associated with WR.3 would apply to the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. All of the other water resources impacts associated with remediation (WR.2-Groundwater Use, WR.4-stormwater runoff, WR.5-Change in Surface Flows) would remain the same as for the proposed Project. Any mitigation measures associated with WR.2, WR.4, and WR.5 would also apply to this alternative. Biological Resources The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would result in direct impacts to about 28 acres of wetland habitat compared with about 26 acres for the proposed Project. In addition, the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would impact approximately 14 acres of VPFS habitat, compared with about 13 acres for the proposed Project. This would increase the severity of impacts BIO.1 (Impacts to Habitat for Listed Species), BIO.3 (Impacts to Federally Listed Species), and BIO.4 (Impacts to Federal Wetlands) compared to the proposed Project. However all three impacts would remain Class II. The mitigation measures associated with BIO.1, BIO.3 and BIO.4 would apply to this alternative. The greater impact to VPFS habitat would increase the severity of BIO.2 (Taking of Listed Federal Species), but would remain a Class II impact. The mitigation measures associated with BIO.2 would apply to this alternative. All of the other biological resources impacts associated with remediation (BIO.5-Habitat Alteration, BIO.6-Impede Migration, and BIO.7-Reduction in Population) would remain the same as for the Proposed Project. Any mitigation measures associated with BIO.5, BIO.6, and BIO.7 would also apply to this alternative. Cultural Resources and Archaeology The potential for encountering unknown archaeological resources would be greater than the proposed Project since there would be more ground disturbance associated with the increased level of excavation. This would increase the potential severity of impacts CR.3 (Inadvertent Discovery of Archaeological Remains), and CR.4 (Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains), but both impacts would remain Class II. The mitigation measures associated with CR.3 and CR.4 would apply to this alternative. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-67 All of the other cultural resources and archaeology impacts associated with remediation (CR.1- Paleontological Resources, CR.2-Historic Resources) would remain the same as for the Proposed Project. Any mitigation measures associated with CR.1 and CR.2 would also apply to this alternative. Noise and Vibration A number of the excavations would need to use sheet pile because of their depth. Sheet pile drivers, which drive the sheet pile into the ground, would be needed for installation. These drivers produce noise levels of approximately 100 dBA at 50 feet, which makes them major noise generators. The sheet pile drivers also produce vibrational effects. The proposed Remediation Project has been designed to avoid excavations to depths that would require sheet piles. This additional construction activity, along with the increase truck traffic discussed above under Transportation/Circulation would increase the severity of the noise and vibration impacts compared to the proposed Project. Impacts N.1-Construiton Noise and N.2-Vibration would remain Class II impacts for the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative. The mitigation measures associated with N.1 and N.2 would apply to this alternative. Wastewater Remedial cap replacement with excavation would require dewatering since some of the excavations would be deep enough to encounter groundwater. In order to complete the excavations the groundwater would need to be removed from the excavations. This alternative would require the treatment and disposal of the water that would be removed from the excavation areas. The treated water would then be discharged on site to one of the creeks, or sent to the City of San Luis Obispo County sewer system. It is estimated that about 29,000,000 gallons of water would have to be treated and disposed of with this alternative. Any discharge of excavation water would require a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit from the RWQCB. The handling of all of this water would increase the potential for impacts to surface water and groundwater quality due to the potential release of water that has been contaminated as part of the excavation process. The proposed Remediation Project has been designed to avoid the need for dewatering operations. Impact WW.1 (Release of Contaminated Water) would remain a Class III impact for the remedial cap replacement with excavation, but the potential severity of the impact would increase due to the large volumes of water that would need to be handled. 5.3.3 Reduced Development This alternative would be very similar to the proposed Project, but less development would occur on the Project Site. With the reduced development alternative, no development would occur on the western portion of the site just north of Tank Farm Road. This is the former Northwest Operations Area, and is the location of the highest level of contamination. Under this alternative, remediation in this area would be the same as for the proposed Project, but development pads would not be constructed. However, the existing buildings that occupy this site would be removed as described for the proposed Proposal. This would reduce the need for structural fill in this area by about 25,000 cubic yards. The Northwest Operations Area would be recontoured to a natural grade and then revegetated. All of the other remediation activities associated with the 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-68 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR proposed Project would remain the same under this alternative. This would be the case for development in either the City or the County. Under the reduced development alternative the impacts in the following issue areas would remain the same as for the proposed Project. Agricultural Resources, Cultural Resources and Archeology, Geological Resources, Noise and Vibration, Hazards and Hazardous Materials Population and Housing, and Recreation. All of the development impacts and mitigation measures identified for the proposed Project in these issue areas would also apply to the reduced development alternative. The reader is referred to Chapter 4 of the EIR for a description of the development impacts and mitigation measures for each of the issue areas listed above. The development impacts associated with each of the affected issue areas are discussed below. Aesthetics and Visual Resources For the proposed Project the EIR found that the development Project could degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, and create nighttime glare from the new development. These impacts were driven by the development on the eastside of the Project Site. The reduced development alternative would still result in development in this area, though there would be less building square footage. With the reduced development alternative, the western portion of the site would not be developed. However, this portion of the site currently has development (buildings associated with existing Tank Farm property), and as such, this portion of the development was not a major driver in the visual quality/character and nighttime glare impacts. Therefore, the impacts to visual quality/character (AE.2) and nighttime glare (AE.3) would less severe than the proposed Project since less building square footage would be developed, but would remain Class II for impact AE.2 and AE.3. The mitigation measures identified for AE.2 and AE.3 for the proposed Project would apply to this alternative. The reduced development under the County Plan would still require the same wastewater treatment plant building. Therefore, Impact AE.4 would be the same for this alternative as the proposed Project. Mitigation measures associated with AE.4 would apply to this alternative. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Construction of the reduced development alternative would generate emissions due to construction equipment engines, fugitive dust, worker vehicles, and delivery of materials and equipment. There would be five phases of construction, with five years for each phase, for a total of 25 years. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-69 Emissions were estimated utilizing the CalEEMod modeling software utilizing the development land uses associated with each phase. Construction equipment load factors were updated, as per the SLOCAPCD CalEEMod guidance, to coordinate with the Carl Moyer Program Guidelines adopted in 2011. Equipment horsepower and daily usage were assigned the CalEEMod defaults. Emissions associated with construction for each phase of the alternative are shown in Table 5-19. Table 5-19 Development Construction Emissions by Phase-Reduced Development Alternative PEAK DAY (lbs/day) ROG + NOx Diesel PM Phase 1 – 2015 170.61 2.55 Phase 2 – 2020 228.32 1.5 Phase 3 – 2025 147.22 0.85 Phase 4 – 2030 195.49 0.55 Phase 5 – 2035 391.96 0.37 Thresholds 137 7 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes No PEAK QUARTER tons/qrtr) Phase ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust Phase 1 – 2015 1.218 0.042 0.707 Phase 2 – 2020 0.875 0.021 0.679 Phase 3 – 2025 0.462 0.007 0.042 Phase 4 – 2030 0.567 0.007 0.679 Phase 5 – 2035 0.931 0.007 0.7 Thresholds 2.5 0.13 2.5 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No Note: Since the construction activity would last for more than 90 days, the daily thresholds would not apply (as per the SLOAPCD Handbook). Peak day emissions would be the same as for the proposed Project. Peak quarterly emissions for the reduced development alternative would be about 30 percent less that for the proposed Project. Therefore, impact AQ.5 (Development Construction Emissions) would be less severe than the proposed Project, but would remain Class III for the reduced development alternative. The mitigation measures associated with AQ.5 would apply to this alternative. The operational phases of the reduced development would generate emissions due to activities at each site that would be a function of land use, employee vehicles, and delivery of materials to each site. Operations would occur with each of the five phases of development and would increase cumulatively every five years as the development is built out. Emissions associated with each phase of the Development for the reduced development alternative are shown in Table 5-19. Additional emissions would occur during each phase of the Development until final build-out in 2040, which are also shown in Table 5-20. Emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod modeling program for each phase along with the associated land use provided in Section 5.1.3.5. Each phase and land use were entered into the 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-70 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR CalEEMod program along with estimated parking lot areas (using the “other asphalt surface” designation). Inputs were utilized as described in the SLOCAPCD CalEEMod information sheet. Most other inputs utilized the CalEEMod defaults. Table 5-20 Development Operational Emissions by Phase-Reduced Development Alternative-Mitigated PEAK DAY (lbs/day) Phase ROG + NOx Diesel PM Fugitive Dust CO Phase 1 – 2020 20.44 0.44 13.79 51.53 Phase 2 – 2025 12.97 0.27 8.37 27.68 Phase 3 – 2030 7.13 0.16 5.31 13.88 Phase 4 – 2035 18.89 0.40 12.42 47.64 Phase 5 – 2040 23.15 0.36 10.63 47.33 Phase 1 & 2 in 2025 26.36 0.54 17.06 56.19 Phases 1, 2 & 3 in 2030 30.07 0.67 22.37 58.64 Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4 in 2035 56.02 1.01 30.46 131.68 All Phases Combined in 2040 51.81 1.22 41.06 86.80 Thresholds 25 1.25 25 550 Exceeds Thresholds? Yes No Yes No PEAK YEAR (tons/year) Phase ROG + NOx Fugitive Dust Phase 1 – 2020 3.00 1.72 Phase 2 – 2025 1.97 1.04 Phase 3 – 2030 1.09 0.64 Phase 4 – 2035 2.86 1.60 Phase 5 – 2040 3.62 1.35 Phase 1 & 2 in 2025 4.35 2.54 Phases 1, 2 &3 in 2030 5.00 3.32 Phases 1, 2, 3 & 4 in 2035 9.21 4.56 All Phases Combined in 2040 8.26 5.10 Thresholds 25 25 Exceeds Thresholds? No No With the reduced development alternative the air emissions from operations would be about 30 percent less than for the proposed Project. Similar levels of emission reductions would occur for GHGs, and CO emissions. For the reduced development alternative, Impacts AQ.6 (ROG+NOx emissions) and AQ.8 (GHG Emissions) would remain Class II, but the severity of the impact would be less than the proposed Project. The mitigation measures associated with AQ.6 and AQ.8 would apply to this alternative. Impact AQ.7 covers both diesel particulate and fugitive dust PM emissions. The diesel particulate impact would be reduced to a Class II impact for the reduced development alternative impact, compared with a Class I impact for the proposed Project. The fugitive dust PM impact 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-71 would remain Class I for the reduced development alternative, but would be less severe than the proposed Project. The mitigation measures associated with AQ.7 would apply to this alternative. ImpactAQ.9 (CO Hot Spots) and AQ.10 (Diesel Particulate Cancer Risk) would remain Class III for the reduced development alternative, but would be less severe than the proposed Project. The mitigation measures associated with AQ.9 would apply to this alternative. AQ.11 (Odors from Wastewater Treatment Facility), which only applies to the County Development Plan, would be the same for this alternative as for the proposed County Development Plan, since the WWTF would still have to be built under this alternative. While the facility might be smaller in size, the odors associated with the operations would remain. Impact AQ.11 would remain Class I for this alternative under the County Development Plan. The mitigation measures associated with AQ.11 would apply to this alternative for the County Development Plan only. Biological Resources BIO.12 (Use of Groundwater Could Impact Wetland Areas), which only applies to the County Development Plan, would be reduced in severity for this alternative since approximately 30 percent less groundwater would need to be used for the development. This reduction in groundwater use would reduce the likelihood that the groundwater levels would be drawn down to a level that wetlands at the site would be impacted. However, even with this reduction in groundwater use Impact BIO.12 would remain Class III for the County Development Plan. All of the other biological resources impacts identified for the City and County Development Plans would remain the same for this alternative as the proposed Project. Any mitigation measures indentified for these impacts for the proposed Project would also apply to this alternative. Transportation and Circulation Traffic generated by the reduced development alternative when the final phase of development is complete would be approximately 30 percent less vehicle trips than for the proposed Project. This would serve to reduce the traffic impacts of the Project. Section 5.1.3.5 provides an estimate of the trip generation for this alternative. Even with this reduction, the Project would still have the same traffic impacts as the proposed Project for both the existing and cumulative conditions. While the severity of the impacts would be reduced, it would not change any of the impact classifications, or intersection level of service. The addition of traffic generated by the reduced development alternative would still cause one intersection to operate at unacceptable levels under existing plus Project conditions (Impact T.2). However, the improvements at the intersection of Broad and Tank Farm Road recently completed by the City would reduce this impact to Class III. The addition of traffic from the reduced development alternative would still cause nine intersections and two freeway segments to operate at unacceptable levels under cumulative conditions. Five intersection impacts and two freeway impacts would be significant and unavoidable, and four intersection impacts would be mitigable to a level of insignificance 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-72 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Impact T.5). This would remain a Class I impact, and the T.5 mitigation measures would apply to the reduced development alternative. Impacts T.3 (Transit System Impacts) and T.4 (Construction Impacts) would remain Class II but would be reduced in severity compared to the proposed Project. The mitigation measures associated with T.3 and T.4 would apply to the reduced development alternative. Public Service and Utilities The reduced development alternative would result in a reduction of the total square feet of building space, and a similar reduction in the total number of people that would occupy the development. This would to some degree reduce the level of demand on fire and police services. It would also reduce the amount of solid waste that would be generated by the construction and operation of the development. The reduction in solid waste would be about 30 percent. Under the reduced development alternative, impacts PS/U.5 and PS/U.10 (Demand on Fire Protection Services for City and County Development), PS/U.6 and PS/U.11 (Demand on Police Services for City and County Development), and PS/U.8 and PS/U.12 (Solid Waste for City and County Development) would be reduced in severity compared to the proposed Project. With the reduced development alternative, 30 percent less building square footage would be built. This would reduce the population using the development by about the same percentage. These reductions would reduce demand for fire protection and police services. The solid waste generated would also be reduced by about 30 percent over the proposed Project. Impact PS/U.5 Demand on Fire Services for the City Development Plan) would remain Class II for this alternative. All of the other impacts discussed above would remain Class III for this alternative. Any mitigation measures associated with PS/U.5, PS/U.6, PS/U.8, PS/U.10, PS/U.11, and PS/U.12 would apply to the reduced development alternative. If the reduced development alternative was developed in the City the water would be provided by the City Utilities Department. Table 5-9 provides an estimate of the water use for the City development under this alternative. The water use with this alternative would be expected to decrease by 30 percent due to the reduction in building square footage. This would reduce the severity of impact PS/U.9 (City Water Use) compared to the proposed Project. However, the impact would remain Class III for the reduced development alternative. PS/U.7 (Nonrenewable Resources) would also be reduced in severity compared to the proposed Project since less development would occur and therefore less energy would be used for buildings and for commuters. These impacts would remain Class III for this alternative. Any mitigation measures associated with PS/U.7 would also apply to the reduced development alternative. Water Resources The western parcels on the Project Site would not be developed as part of the reduced development alternative. This would reduce the amount of paving associated with the development, and thereby reduce the amount of surface water runoff from paved areas. This would reduce the severity of impact WR.6 (Surface Water Runoff) compared to the proposed Project, but the impact would remain Class III for this alternative. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-73 Under the County reduced development alternative, water would be supplied from onsite groundwater wells. Table 5-11 provides an estimate of the water use for the County development under this alternative. The water use with this alternative would be expected to decrease by 30 percent due to the reduction in building square footage. This would reduce the severity of impact WR.8 (Use of Groundwater) compared to the proposed Project. However, the impact would remain Class III for the reduced development alternative. Mitigation measures associated with WR.8 would also apply to the reduced development alternative. The reduction in groundwater use would also reduce the severity of impact WR.9 Contamination of Groundwater) since it would involve less drawdown of the groundwater. With less groundwater pumping there is less likelihood of drawing hydrocarbons from the shallow groundwater to the deep groundwater wells. Impact WR.9 would remain Class II under the reduced development alternative. Mitigation measures associated with WR.9 would also apply to the reduced development alternative. WR.7 (Flooding due to Building in the 100-Year Flood Plain) would be the same as the proposed Project since none of the structures would be built in the 100-year flood plain. Impact WR.7 would remain Class III for this alternative. Wastewater If the reduced development alternative was developed in the City the sewer service would be provided by the City Utilities Department. Table 5-9 provides an estimate of the wastewater generated for the City development under this alternative. The wastewater generated with this alternative would be expected to decrease by 30 percent due to the reduction in building square footage. This would reduce the severity of impact WW.2 (City Sewer) compared to the proposed Project. However, the impact would remain Class III for the reduced development alternative. Under the County reduced development alternative, wastewater would be handled by an onsite wastewater treatment plant. Table 5-11 provides an estimate of the wastewater generated for the County development under this alternative. The wastewater generated with this alternative would be expected to decrease by 30 percent due to the reduction in building square footage. This would reduce the severity of impacts WW.3 (Discharge Flow Rates) and WW.4 (Wastewater Discharges to Streams) compared to the proposed Project. However the impact classifications would remain the same as for the proposed Project (Class I for WW.3 and Class II for WW.4). Mitigation measures associated with WW.3 and WW.4 would also apply to the reduced development alternative. 5.4 Environmentally Superior Alternative This section summarizes the environmental advantages and disadvantages associated with the proposed Project and the selected alternatives. Based upon this discussion, the environmentally superior alternative is selected as required by CEQA. The State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126 (d) (2), state that if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, then the next most environmentally preferred alternative must also be identified. CEQA does not provide specific direction regarding the methodology of comparing alternatives and the proposed Project. Each Project must be evaluated for the issues and impacts that are 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-74 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR most important; this will vary depending on the project type and the environmental setting. Issue areas with significant long-term impacts are generally given more weight in comparing alternatives. Impacts that are short-term (e.g., construction-related impacts) or those that are mitigable to less than significant levels are generally considered to be less important. Table 5-21 (which is at the end of this section) provides a comparison between the proposed Project and each of the selected alternatives for each impact identified in the issue areas. For impacts with the same classification, an increase or decrease in severity is denoted with an up or down arrow, respectively. These impacts in the table were identified as a result of the analysis provided in Chapter 4.0, Environmental Analysis, for the proposed Project and Section 5.3 for the alternatives. 5.4.1 Remediation 5.4.1.1 Proposed Project and the No Project Alternative The remediation/restoration portion of the No Project Alternative would be essentially the same as that for the proposed Project. The only change would be that the remediation portion of the No Project Alternative would not include the construction of the rough pads for the proposed development. Instead, the areas that are proposed for development would be returned to their natural grade and revegetated. None of the proposed infrastructure improvements associated with roads would occur as part of the No Project Alternative. Only the onsite drainage improvements associated with remediation would occur. The reasons for this are discussed in Sections 5.1.2 and 5.3.1. There is very little difference in the environmental impacts of remediation/restoration under the No Project Alternative and the proposed Project. As discuss in Section 5.3.1, remediation/restoration under the No Project Alternative would not eliminate or change the significance (i.e., impact classification) of any of the environmental impacts of the proposed Remediation Project. The remediation/restoration portion of the No Project Alternative would reduce the severity of all of the air emission impacts including fugitive dust (PM), which was found to be a significant and unavoidable impact (Class I). However, even with remediation/restoration under the No Project Alternative, impacts associated with fugitive dust emissions would remain Class I. Remediation/restoration under the No Project Alternative would also reduce the severity of four Class II impacts (AE.1-Visual Character/Quality, AQ.1-ROG+NOx Air Emissions, AQ.4-Toxic Air Emissions, and T.1-Traffic Impacts to Roadways. None of these are significant and unavoidable impacts (Class I). Given that remediation under the No Project Alternative would reduce the severity of one Class I impact (fugitive dust), it was found to be the environmentally superior alternative. However, if the Project Site was remediated under the No Project Alternative, it would have to remain as open space and no development could occur. As such, remediation under the No Project Alternative would not meet any of the development objectives of the Project. CEQA requires that if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, then the next most environmentally preferred alternative must also be identified. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-75 5.4.1.2 Proposed Project and Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation Alternative The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would involve excavation of the areas on the site that are proposed for remedial caps. The remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would not reduce the severity of, or eliminate any of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. This alternative would increase the severity of 21 other Class II impacts (less than significant with mitigation) identified as part of the proposed Project. These impacts are shown in Table 5.21. This alternative would result in the removal of more of the hydrocarbon impacted material from the site than the proposed Project. However, the level of human health and ecological risk would remain essentially the same as for the proposed Project. The main reason for this is that with the proposed Project these areas would be capped with clean soil/gravel and vapor barriers would be installed. These remedial methods would provide essentially the same levels of protection and risk reduction as excavation based upon the type of contamination at the Project Site (mainly crude oil components, and arsenic). Given that the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative would increase the severity of 21 Class II impacts, and provide no reduction in environmental impacts, the proposed Remediation Project was found, in comparison to the No Project Alternative, to be the next environmentally superior alternative. 5.4.2 Development 5.4.2.1 Proposed Project and No Project Alternative The development portion of the No Project Alternative would eliminate all of the development impacts of the proposed Project since no development would occur. It would also eliminate the beneficial impact to recreation since the ball fields and bike paths would not be built. Clearly, the development portion of the No Project Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative. The No Project Alternative would not meet any of the development objectives of the Project. CEQA requires that if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, then the next most environmentally preferred alternative must also be identified. 5.4.2.2 Proposed Project and Reduced Development Alternative The reduced development alternative would be very similar to the proposed Project, but 30 percent less building square footage would be developed on the Project Site. With the reduced development alternative, no development would occur on the western portion of the site just north of Tank Farm Road. This is the area of the former Northwest Operations Area, and is the location of the highest level of contamination. Under this alternative, the remediation would be the same as for the proposed Project, except the development pads would not be constructed in the Northwest Operations Area. This alternative would apply to both the City and County Development Plans. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-76 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR This alternative would reduce the impact classification of one part of impact AQ.7 (Diesel Particulate Emissions) from significant and unavoidable (Class I) to less than significant with mitigation (Class II). The other part of impact AQ.7 (Fugitive Dust Emissions) would remain Class I but would be reduced in severity. Impact T.5 (Traffic Impacts to Five Intersections and Two Freeway Segments under the Cumulative Conditions), would be reduced in severity but would remain a Class I impact for this alternative. It should be noted that the traffic impact of the Project under the existing conditions (i.e., the baseline) would be less than significant (Class II) for this alternative. The reduced development alternative would also reduce the severity of seven other Class II impacts (less than significant with mitigation) identified as part of the proposed City and County Development Plans. One Class II impact (less than significant with mitigation) identified as part of the proposed City a Development Plan would be reduced in severity with this alternative. These impacts are shown in Table 5.21. For the County Development Plan only, this alternative would reduce the severity of one significant and unavoidable (Class I) impact (WW.3-Discharges from the Wastewater Treatment Plant Increasing Surface Water Flows during Storm Events). However, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I) for the reduced development alternative. The reduced development alternative would also reduce the severity of two Class II impacts (less than significant with mitigation) identified as part of the proposed County Development Plan (WR.9- Potential for Hydrocarbon Migration to Groundwater Wells used for Potable Water and WW.4- WWTP Discharges Increase Pollutants into Existing Drainages). The reduced development alternative would meet all but one of the objectives of the proposed Project. The Applicant has stated that any reduction in building square footage would not meet objective #5 that states, “develop an economically viable commercial project with infrastructure and development phased over 25 years”. The Applicant’s position has been that all of the building square footage would be needed to allow for the public infrastructure that would be required for the Project, and that any reduction in the building square footage would make the Project uneconomical. The EIR does not address the issue of economic feasibility. The proposed building square footage would be less than what was envisioned in the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP), and would be well below the allowable building and population densities allowed under the Airport Area Specific Plan. From an environmental standpoint, the reduced development alternative would eliminate one significant and unavoidable (Class I) Project impact (the portion of AQ.7 covering diesel particulate emissions) and reduce the severity of the remaining significant and unavoidable portion of AQ.7 covering fugitive dust emissions. The alternative would also reduce the severity of the significant and unavoidable (Class I) cumulative traffic impact (T.5-Traffic Impacts to Five Intersections and Two Freeway Segments under the Cumulative Conditions). However, the traffic and fugitive dust impacts would remain significant and unavoidable (Class I) for this alternative. Given that reduced development alternative would eliminate the Class I impact associated with diesel particulate emissions (first part of AQ.7), and would reduce the severity of two other Class 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-77 I impact (the second part of AQ.7 covering fugitive dust emissions and T.5 covering cumulative traffic impacts), it was found, in comparison to the No Project Alternative, to be the next environmentally superior alternative. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-78 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 Remediation AE.1 The Project remediation activities could degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Class II Class II() Class II() NA AQ.1 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate ROG + NOx emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Class II Class II() Class II() NA AQ.2 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate fugitive dust that exceeds SLOAPCD thresholds. Class II Class II() Class II() NA AQ.3 Construction activities associated with remediation could generate GHG emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Class III Class III() Class III() NA AQ.4 Construction activities associated with remediation would generate toxic emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds for impacts to sensitive receptors. Class II Class II() Class II() NA AR.1 The Project would result in the conversion of farmland or grazing land to non- agricultural uses. Class III Class III Class III NA AR.2 The Project would potentially conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or with a Williamson Act contract. Class III Class III Class III NA AR.3 Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Class II Class II Class II NA BIO.1 Site remediation has the potential to result in both short-term and long-term impacts to habitat for listed and special status species. Class II Class II Class II() NA BIO.2 Site remediation and restoration would result in the taking of listed specimens, special-status species, or species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act Class II Class II Class II() NA BIO.3 Site remediation and restoration could result in short-term and permanent loss of Class II Class II Class II () NA 4 NA is used for the development portion of the No Project Alternative since no development would occur, and as such the development impacts for the proposed Project would not apply. 5 NA is used for the development portion of the remedial cap replacement with excavation alternative since this alternative would not apply to the development phase of the project. With this alternative, the City and County Development Plan Impacts would be the same as the proposed Project. 6 NA is used for the remediation portion of the reduced development alternative since this alternative would not apply to the remediation phase of the project. With this alternative, the remediation would be the same as the propose Project. 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-79 Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. BIO.4 Site remediation would adversely affect federal wetlands as defined in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Class II Class II Class II() NA BIO.5 Site remediation and restoration would result in habitat alteration that precludes the re-establishment of native populations of plants and animals. Class II Class II Class II() NA BIO.6 Site remediation and restoration would temporarily impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi-aquatic wildlife species. Class II Class II Class II() NA BIO.7 Site remediation and restoration have the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. Class II Class II Class II() NA CR.1 Impacts to paleontological resources due to ground disturbance as a result of the remediation and process. Class II Class II Class II() NA CR.2 Impacts to historical resources (P-40-041195, the Project Site) due to ground disturbance as a result of the remediation process. Class II Class II Class II() NA CR.3 Inadvertent discovery of archaeological remains during remediation activities. Class II Class II Class II() NA CR.4 Inadvertent discovery of human remains during remediation activities. Class II Class II Class II() NA GR.1 Remediation activities may cause erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground disturbing activities. Class II Class II Class II() NA HM.1 Potential health risk due to exposure to residual contamination following site remediation for future site uses. Class III Class III Class III NA HM.2 Public accident risk associated with truck traffic during site remediation. Class III Class III() Class III() NA HM.3 Asbestos exposure risk during site remediation activities. Class II Class II Class II NA HM.4 Increased aircraft wildlife strike risk due to wetland restoration within the airport Runway Protection Zone and Safety Areas. Class I Class I Class I NA HM.5 Potential aircraft safety hazards due to changes in topography of the project site. Class IV NA Class IV NA 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-80 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 N.1 On-site construction activities could generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Class II Class II Class II() NA N.2 On-site construction activities including blasting of rock could generate vibration impacts to nearby areas. Class II Class II Class II() NA P/H.1 The remediation component of the Project may induce substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. Class III Class III Class III NA PS/U.1 Additional truck trips or construction activities could interfere with Fire protection emergency vehicles response times along Tank Farm Road. Class III Class III() Class III() NA PS/U.2 Additional truck trips or construction activities could interfere with Police protection emergency vehicles response times along Tank Farm Road. Class III Class III() Class III() NA PS/U.3 Construction equipment could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Class III Class III() Class III() NA PS/U.4 Remediation activities would generate solid waste requiring disposal at landfills. Class III Class III Class III() NA REC.1 The remediation activities could have a potential effect on existing recreational facilities and users. Class III Class III Class III NA T.1 Remediation activities related to the Project could result in potentially significant impacts to roadways in the Project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles creating an unsafe situation. Class II Class II() Class II() NA WR.1 The remediation stage of the Project could result in short-term, impacts to surface water quality, including indirect impacts to beneficial uses such as threatened and endangered species habitat, due to polluted runoff during construction. Class II Class II Class II() NA WR.2 The use of groundwater resources as a water supply for remediation could deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Class III Class III Class III NA WR.3 The excavation of the contaminated soils could bring contaminant constituents to the surface where they could be mobilized by stormwater or irrigation activities. Class II Class II Class II() NA WR.4 The construction of the remediation caps may increase or concentrate storm runoff flowing onto erodible soils from impervious surfaces. Class II Class II Class II NA WR.5 Grading and recontouring of the site could result in changes to surface water flows, Class III Class III Class III NA 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-81 Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 thereby increasing surface water runoff from the Project Site. WW.1 The wastewater generated from remediation activities could result in releases to the environment that could impact surface water or groundwater quality. Class III Class III Class III() NA City and County Development AE.2 The City Development Plan component of the Project would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Class II NA NA Class II() AE.3 The proposed Project will generate a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Class II NA NA Class II() AQ.5 Construction activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Class III NA NA Class III() AQ.6 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate ROG+NOx emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Class II NA NA Class II() AQ.7 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate diesel particulate (DP) and fugitive dust (FD) emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Class I NA NA Class II-DP Class I()-FD AQ.8 Operational and construction activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate GHG emissions that exceed SLOAPCD thresholds. Class II NA NA Class II() AQ.9 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate CO emissions that produce localized CO Hot Spots. Class III NA NA Class III() AQ.10 Operational activities associated with the City Development Plan would generate diesel PM emissions that produce localized, elevated cancer impacts. Class III NA NA Class III() AR.4 The City Development Plan would result in the conversion of farmland or grazing land to non-agricultural uses. Class III NA NA Class III AR.5 Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Class II NA NA Class II BIO.10 The City Development Plan has the potential to reduce the size and diversity of plant and animal populations at the Project Site. Class II NA NA Class II BIO.8 The City Development Plan would result in short-term and permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, native grasslands, habitats for rare plants and Class II NA NA Class II 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-82 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. BIO.9 The City Development Plan would permanently impede migration and dispersal of upland, aquatic, and semi-aquatic wildlife species. Class II NA NA Class II GR.2 Seismically induced ground shaking could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, potentially resulting in loss of property or risk to human health and safety. Class II NA NA Class II GR.3 Existing uncertified fill on-site could be subject to hydroconsolidation, excessive settlement, expansive soil shrink and swell, and differential settlement and expansion, and thus could damage proposed facilities, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Class II NA NA Class II GR.4 Construction activities and grading may cause erosion-induced siltation of nearby waterways as a result of ground disturbing activities. Class II NA NA Class II GR.5 Moderately expansive soils prone to swelling and shrinking from increased or decreased water content could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Class II NA NA Class II GR.6 Construction and improvement in areas lacking suitable factors of safety for existing slopes could result in gross or surficial instability, as well as earthquake- induced landslides, which could damage proposed structures and infrastructure, resulting in loss of property and risks to human health and safety. Class III NA NA Class III GR.7 Compressible soils that underlie the site will be prone to excessive settlement that could adversely affect the proposed development and improvements. Class II NA NA Class II HM.6 Potential health risk from exposure to residual contamination following site cleanup and development. Class II NA NA Class II HM.8 Potential risk associated with the future use of acutely hazardous materials in the SLOCRA safety areas. Class II NA NA Class II HM.9 Risk associated with land use changes and aircraft wildlife strikes and other aircraft hazards. Class III NA NA Class III 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-83 Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 N.3 Construction activities associated with the construction of the City Development Plan could increase noise levels in the area. Class II NA NA Class II N.4 Off-site City Development Plan related traffic would generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Class III NA NA Class III N.5 Development within the ALUP single event noise contours could cause the development to be exposed to unacceptable noise levels. Class II NA NA Class II P/H.1 The City Project may induce substantial growth in the area by proposing new businesses in the area. Class III NA NA Class III REC.2 The Project would increase the City’s recreational acreage stock with 15 acres of sports fields, as well as Class I and Class II bicycle lanes, while not adding residential development. Class IV NA NA Class IV T.2 The addition of traffic generated by the Project would cause one intersection to operate at unacceptable levels under Existing plus Project conditions. Class II NA NA Class II() T.3 Impacts to the City’s transit system could result due to increased ridership generated by the Project, impacts to bicycle and pedestrian facilities could result from network discontinuities and unsafe crossings; impacts to site access and on- site circulation could result from queue spillback and the creation of additional conflict points. Class II NA NA Class II() T.4 The proposed construction phasing plan would disrupt vehicle and bicycle travel for an extended duration, and the proposed truck routes are inconsistent with the City’s Circulation Element. Construction activities related to the Project could result in potentially significant impacts to roadways in the Project vicinity due to the potential obstruction of heavy vehicles. Class II NA NA Class II() T.5 The addition of Project traffic would cause nine intersections and two freeway segments to operate at unacceptable levels under Cumulative conditions. Five intersection impacts and two freeway impacts would be significant and unavoidable, and four intersection impacts would be mitigable to a level of insignificance. Class I NA NA Class I() WR.6 Paving and development could result in changes to surface water flows thereby Class III NA NA Class III() 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-84 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 increasing surface water runoff from the Project Site. WR.7 Flooding of development structures or redirection of flood flows could occur if buildings are built within the 100-year flood plain. Class III NA NA Class III City Development Only HM.7 Potential public risk associated with development within the SLOCRA Safety Areas. Class III NA NA Class III PS/U.5 Build-out of the proposed land uses could increase demand for Fire Protection services. Class II NA NA Class II() PS/U.6 Build-out of the proposed land uses would create an incrementally higher demand for Police Protection services. Class III NA NA Class III() PS/U.7 Construction and operation of the proposed Project could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Class III NA NA Class III() PS/U.8 Construction and operation of the proposed Project could generate significant amounts of solid waste. Class III NA NA Class III() PS/U.9 Development of the Project could impact availability of water supplies from the City water Utility. Class III NA NA Class III() WW.2 The wastewater generated from the City Development Plan component of the Project would exceed the design capacity of the City’s downstream sewer lines or the capacity of the Water Reclamation Facility. Class III NA NA Class III() County Development Only AE.4 The wastewater treatment facility would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Class II NA NA Class II AQ.11 Operational activities associated with the County Development Plan WWTP could generate odor emissions. Class II NA NA Class II BIO.11 The County Development Plan, specifically the wastewater treatment plant component would result in short-term and permanent loss of biological functions of wetlands, habitats for rare plants and animals, and other biotic communities considered sensitive by federal, state, or local policies, statutes, and regulations. Class II NA NA Class II BIO.12 The County Development Plan, specifically the use of groundwater, would result in Class III NA NA Class III() 5.0 Alternatives Analysis December 2013 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5-85 Table 5.21 Comparison of Proposed Project and Alternative Impacts Impact # Impact Description Impact Classification Decrease in Severity but the same Classification Increase in Severity but the same Classification Proposed Project No Project4 Remedial Cap Replacement with Excavation5 Reduced Development 6 impacts to wetland areas and VPFS by drawing down surface water levels. HM.10 Risk associated with chemical spills due to aircraft strikes for both the direct discharge and polishing pond wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) options. Class II NA NA Class II HM.11 Risk associated with polishing ponds WWTF option could affect aircraft bird strikes. Class II NA NA Class II HM.12 Potential public risk associated with development within the SLOCRA Safety Areas. Class III NA NA Class III N.6 Development related industrial noise could generate noise impacts to nearby areas. Class II NA NA Class II PS/U.10 Build-out of the County Development Plan could increase demand for Fire Protection services Class III NA NA Class III() PS/U.11 Build-out of the County Development Plan would create an incrementally higher demand for Police Protection services. Class III NA NA Class III() PS/U.12 Construction and operation of the County Development Plan could potentially use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful or inefficient manner. Class III NA NA Class III() PS/U.13 Construction and operation of the County Development Plan could generate significant amounts of solid waste. Class III NA NA Class III() WR.8 The use of groundwater for the County Development Plan could result in depleted groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Class III NA NA Class III() WR.9 The use of groundwater for the County Development Plan could result in the migration of hydrocarbons from the shallow ground water to the deep groundwater wells. Class II NA NA Class II() WW.3 Discharges from the wastewater treatment plant would increase surface water flow rates and impact downstream properties. Class I NA NA Class I() WW.4 The wastewater treatment plant discharges would increase pollutants into the existing drainages. Class II NA NA Class II() 5.0 Alternatives Analysis Chevron Tank Farm 5-86 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 5.5 References The Airport Land Use Commission for San Luis Obispo County. 2005. Airport Land Use Plan for the San Luis Obispo Regional Airport. San Luis Obispo, CA: The Airport Land Use Commission for San Luis Obispo County; May 18, 2005. AVOCET. 2007. Remedial Action Plan. December 18, 2007. AVOCET. 2007. Feasibility Study, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. March 15, 2007. City of San Luis Obispo. 2005. Airport Compatible Open Space Plan. February 2005. 2005. Airport Area Specific Plan. August 2005. 2004. Margareta Area Specific Plan. October2004. County of San Luis Obispo. 1992. General Plan - Noise Element. May 5, 1992. Chevron. 2007. Final Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Re-development Project. San Luis Obispo, CA: December 20, 2007. Chevron. 2008. Restoration and Redevelopment Project Application. McDaniel Lambert, Inc. 2004. Human Health Risk Assessment for the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. Version 2.0. San Luis Obispo, CA. May 25, 2004. Padre. 2007. Project Execution Plan for the Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Restoration and Re-Development Project. San Luis Obispo, CA: December 20, 2007. Phil Dunsmore. Personal Communication. 2013. 6.0 Other CEQA Mandated Sections December 2013 6-1 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 6.0 Other CEQA-Mandated Sections The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires evaluations of irreversible or irretrievable commitment of resources and project related growth-inducing impacts. The following sections evaluate the proposed Project in light of these requirements. Chapter 4.0 discusses potentially significant environmental impacts, as described in the State CEQA Guidelines section 15126.2(a) and (b). 6.1 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes That Would be Caused by the Proposed Project Should It Be Implemented Section 15126.2(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that significant irreversible environmental changes, which would be involved with a proposed project, may include the following: Uses of non-renewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the project that would be irreversible because a large commitment of such resources makes removal or non- use thereafter unlikely; Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts that commit future generations to similar uses; and Irreversible damage, which may result from environmental accidents, associated with the project. Construction of the proposed Project would involve the consumption of some non-renewable and locally limited natural resources (i.e., fossil fuels and water) associated with construction activities. Implementation of the development plans and related facilities would result in the commitment of nonrenewable natural resources (such as petroleum products) and slowly renewable resources, such as wood products used in buildings. Additionally, the Project would result in the irreversible change of the area from a rural development pattern, including agricultural lands, to an urban setting. 6.2 Growth-Inducing Impacts Section 15126.2(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that growth-inducing impacts of the proposed project must be discussed in the Environmental Impact Report. In general terms, a project may induce spatial, economic, or population growth in a geographic area if it meets any of these four criteria: Removal of an impediment to growth (e.g., establishment of an essential public service or the provisions of new access to an area); Economic expansion or growth (e.g., changes in revenue base, employment expansion); 6.0 Other CEQA-Mandated Sections Chevron Tank Farm 6-2 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR Establishment of a precedent-setting action (e.g., an innovation, a change in zoning or general plan amendment approval); or Development or encroachment in an isolated area or one adjacent to open space (being different from an “infill” type of project). Should a project meet any one of the above listed criteria, it can be considered growth inducing. The impacts of the proposed Project are evaluated below with regard to these four growth- inducing criteria. 6.2.1 Removal of an Impediment to Growth Future development at the Project Site would involve the construction and use of service and manufacturing activities as well as recreation and open space. Under the County development option, a waste water treatment plant would also be installed. The WWTP could be considered an essential public service. The construction and use of the area for service and manufacturing would provide new access to a previously inaccessible area. The project will result in the potential for future development. However, the project directly implements policies and plans adopted by the City and County, including the City Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) and the County General Plan. The growth-inducement analysis is based on the assumption that the growth inducing impacts analysis of the Airport Area Specific Plan EIR provides an appropriate and adequate base for analysis of future development and growth-inducing impacts associated with the Project. As a result, future development at the Project Site would not cause significant growth inducement under this criterion. 6.2.2 Economic Growth Economic growth is evaluated to the extent that it would relate directly or indirectly to a physical impact on the environment. Economic growth could occur in the area during future development activities because of construction workers and associated support services. Employment due to future activities at the proposed Project Site would be limited to increased labor for construction, most of which is short-tem temporary labor. New operational employment would be associated with future development at the site. The activities would create some increase to the area’s existing revenue base. Implementation of the adopted policies in the AASP and General Plans combined with implementation of the mitigation measures identified in this EIR would reduce the secondary effects of growth associated with the proposed Project. However, these impacts would not be reduced to less-than-significant levels. As such, the Project could have a significant growth inducement under this criterion. 6.2.3 Precedent-Setting Action The City’s AASP and the County’s General Plan would allow for development on the Project Site with the applicable permits. The type and extent of the proposed development would be consistent with the both of these plans. Therefore, the Project would not be precedent-setting and would not cause significant growth inducement under this criterion. 6.0 Other CEQA Mandated Sections December 2013 6-3 Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final EIR 6.2.4 Development of Open Space The Project Site is within the County, but it is located within the City’s Urban Reserve Line URL) and Urban Services Line (USL) and has been identified by the City for annexation. The current zoning for the Project Site is a combination of Industrial, Commercial-Service, Recreation, and Agriculture, with about 57 acres zoned for development. Under the proposed Project about 54 acres would be used or development. The remainder of the site would be zoned Recreational/Open Space. Therefore, the project would not cause significant growth inducement under this criterion. 6.3 Energy Conservation In order to assure that energy implications are considered in project decisions, CEQA requires that EIRs include a discussion of the potential energy impacts of proposed projects, with particular emphasis on avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy (see Public Resources Code section 21100(b)(3)). According to Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines, the goal of conserving energy implies the wise and efficient use of energy including: (1) decreasing overall per capita energy consumption; (2) decreasing reliance on natural gas and oil; and (3) increasing reliance on renewable energy sources. Compliance with all applicable building codes, as well as with County or City policies and the Applicant proposed measures and mitigation measures identified in this EIR, would ensure that energy is conserved to the maximum extent possible. Resources that would be consumed as a result of project implementation include water, electricity, and fossil fuels during construction and operation. Additionally, construction would require the manufacture of new materials, some of which would not be recyclable at the end of the proposed Project’s lifetime, and the energy required for the production of these materials would also result in an irretrievable commitment of natural resources. However, the amount and rate of consumption of these resources would not result in significant environmental impacts or the unnecessary, inefficient, or wasteful use of resources. Compliance with all applicable building codes, as well as County or City policies and the mitigation measures identified in this EIR would ensure that all natural resources are conserved to the maximum extent possible. A number of measures have been included in the Project and mitigation measures that would conserve energy. These include the following: Water conservation practices for both construction and development phases; Transit system improvements (bicycle systems, bus stops, etc); Traffic circulation improvements; Exceeding Title 24 building efficiency requirements and implementing energy efficient deign tree shading, building orientation, etc); Transportation Demand Management program; Employee Trip Reduction Program, ride-share programs, shuttles, on-site eating, on-site shower facilities, and improved pedestrian design. 6.0 Other CEQA-Mandated Sections Chevron Tank Farm 6-4 December 2013 Remediation and Development Project Final EIR In addition, both the County's and City’s Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) incorporate material to address conservation issues, including energy resources. As an adopted Element of the County’s and City’s General Plans, under State law the decision makers must consider the project's consistency with the COSE. Applicable goals and policies of the COSE and other applicable plans, ordinances, regulations, and standards are discussed in this EIR. Compliance with the County or City COSE would also ensure that energy use by the Project is minimized. FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN San Luis Obispo Tank Farm 276 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 PREPARED FOR Chevron Environmental Management Company 276 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, California 93406 PREPARED BY Avocet Environmental, Inc. 1 Technology Drive, Suite C515 Irvine, California 92618-5302 Robert Van Hyning, P.E. Principal Project No. 1306.005 FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN San Luis Obispo Tank Farm 276 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 March 31, 2015 Project No. 1306.005 Mr. Andy Smith CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY 276 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Final Remedial Action Plan San Luis Obispo Tank Farm 276 Tank Farm Road San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed is the Final Remedial Action Plan for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm. The plan has been revised to address comments from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, County Public Health Department, County Air Pollution Control District, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, AVOCET ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Robert Van Hyning, P.E. Principal RVH:sh Enclosure P:\1306 ChevronEMC_SLOTF\RAP Update 2015\Final RAP_2015-03-31.docx Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page i San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................. vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN PURPOSE AND FRAMEWORK .................................................. 1 1.2 SCOPE OF THE REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN ........................................................................ 2 1.3 OTHER PLANS ................................................................................................................ 3 1.4 FINAL CERTIFICATION REPORT ...................................................................................... 3 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................... 5 2.1 CURRENT CONDITION .................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Offsite Utilities.................................................................................................. 9 2.1.2 Operations Related Pipelines ............................................................................ 9 2.1.3 Potential Land Use ............................................................................................ 9 2.2 SITE HYDROLOGY ........................................................................................................ 10 2.3 WETLANDS AND RARE PLANT HABITAT ...................................................................... 11 2.4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION SUMMARY .......................................................................... 11 2.5 UPDATED HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT UPDATE .............................................. 14 3.0 OPERABLE UNITS, AREAS OF CONCERN, AND THE INTEGRATED PREFERRED REMEDY ................................................................................................... 15 3.1 OU #1- FORMER NW OPERATIONS AREA .................................................................... 16 3.1.1 AOC #1 - Groundwater ................................................................................... 17 3.1.2 AOC #2 - Soil ................................................................................................. 18 3.2 OU #2- RESERVOIRS 5 AND 7 ....................................................................................... 18 3.3 OU #3- RESERVOIR 4 (EAST DEVELOPMENT AREA) .................................................... 19 3.4 OU #4- REMAINING SITE-WIDE TERRESTRIAL AND WATERS/WETLANDS AREAS ........ 20 3.4.1 AOC #1 - North Marsh Complex.................................................................... 21 3.4.2 AOC #2 - Reservoir 3 ..................................................................................... 22 3.4.3 AOC #3 - Pliable Surface Expressions of Petroleum ..................................... 22 3.4.4 AOC #4 – Arsenic ........................................................................................... 23 3.5 OU #5- SITE-WIDE GROUNDWATER ............................................................................ 23 4.0 GENERAL REMEDIAL ACTIONS ................................................................................ 25 4.1 LONG-TERM MONITORING ........................................................................................... 25 4.2 REMOVAL EXCAVATIONS ............................................................................................ 26 4.3 CAPS ............................................................................................................................ 28 Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page ii San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Page 5.0 EARTH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ..................................................................... 29 5.1 COMMON FILL ............................................................................................................. 29 5.2 STRUCTURAL FILL ....................................................................................................... 29 5.3 GRAVEL ....................................................................................................................... 29 5.4 TOPSOIL ....................................................................................................................... 30 5.5 EARTH MATERIAL SOURCES ........................................................................................ 30 5.5.1 Flower Mound/OU #3 ..................................................................................... 31 5.5.2 Berms .............................................................................................................. 31 5.5.3 Borrow No. 1 .................................................................................................. 32 5.5.4 Borrow No. 2 .................................................................................................. 32 5.5.5 Borrow No. 3 .................................................................................................. 32 5.5.6 Oxbow Borrow................................................................................................ 33 6.0 SITE-WIDE REMEDIAL ACTIONS .............................................................................. 34 6.1 MOBILIZATION, STAGING AREAS, AND SITE ACCESS ................................................... 34 6.2 BUILDING DEMOLITION ............................................................................................... 36 6.3 MISCELLANEOUS CLEANUP ......................................................................................... 36 6.4 PIPELINE REMOVAL AND ABANDONMENT ................................................................... 37 6.4.1 Pipeline Inventory ........................................................................................... 38 6.4.2 Pipeline Flushing and Pigging ........................................................................ 38 6.4.3 Pipeline Grouting ............................................................................................ 39 6.4.4 Pipeline Segment Removal ............................................................................. 39 6.5 MONITORING WELL DESTRUCTION .............................................................................. 40 6.6 HISTORICAL WATER WELLS ........................................................................................ 40 6.7 RESERVOIR 2 BERM REMOVAL .................................................................................... 41 6.8 LAND USE COVENANTS ............................................................................................... 41 6.9 VAPOR BARRIERS ........................................................................................................ 42 7.0 OPERABLE UNIT REMEDIAL ACTIONS ................................................................... 43 7.1 OU #1 - NW OPERATIONS AREA ................................................................................. 43 7.1.1 AOC #1 - Groundwater ................................................................................... 43 7.1.2 AOC #2 - Soil-Development Scenario ........................................................... 43 7.2 OU #2 - RESERVOIRS 5 AND 7 ...................................................................................... 50 7.3 OU #3 - RESERVOIR 4 .................................................................................................. 55 7.4 OU #4 - REMAINING SITE-WIDE TERRESTRIAL AND WETLAND AREAS ....................... 59 7.4.1 AOC #1 - North Marsh ................................................................................... 59 7.4.2 AOC #2 - Reservoir 3 ..................................................................................... 61 7.4.3 AOC #3 - Other Sticky Hydrocarbon Surface Expressions ............................ 64 7.4.4 AOC #4 - Arsenic ........................................................................................... 64 7.5 OU #5 - SITE-WIDE GROUNDWATER ........................................................................... 65 8.0 IMPACTS TO NATURAL RESOURCES AND MITIGATION .................................. 66 9.0 LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE ..................................................................................... 67 Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page iii San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Page 10.0 SCHEDULE ........................................................................................................................ 69 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 70 TABLES FIGURES APPENDIX A: REPORT CD APPENDIX B: MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 93-120 AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS APPENDIX C: REMEDIAL DESIGN DRAWINGS APPENDIX D: RESERVOIR 2 – WALL DEMOLITION AND BERM GRADING APPENDIX E: EARTH MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX F: QUANTITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX G: HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX H: SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS APPENDIX I: GEOSYNTHETIC CALCULATIONS APPENDIX J: SOIL LOSS CALCULATIONS APPENDIX K: MODIFICATIONS TO PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO ADDRESS ELEVATED ARSENIC CONCENTRATIONS APPENDIX L: PIPELINE QUANTITY ESTIMATE APPENDIX M: VAPOR BARRIER ENGINEERING GUIDELINES APPENDIX N: AGENCY COMMENTS REGARDING RAP AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS APPENDIX O: UPDATED HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT, JANUARY 30, 2013 APPENDIX P: NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS REPORT (PADRE 2012) Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page iv San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title 1 Summary of Operable Units and Preferred Remedies 2 List of Active Monitoring Wells and Wells Proposed for Abandonment 3 Estimated Borrow Source Quantities 4 Estimated Remediation Construction Quantities Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page v San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Map 3 Northwest Operations Area Historical and Current Features 4 Existing Utilities 5 Chevron Pipelines 6 Detail Plan of Chevron Pipelines in Northwest Operations Area 7 Existing San Luis Obispo County Land Use Plan 8 City of San Luis Obispo AASP Land Use Plan 9 Constraints to the Proposed City of San Luis Obispo Land Use Plan 10 Proposed Land Use Concept 11 Hydrology Map 12 Wetlands, Fairy Shrimp, and Rare Plant Habitats 13 Summary of Environmental Impacts 14 Overview of Operable Units 15 Proposed Impacted Soil Stockpile Location 16 Borrow Source Location Map 17 Proposed Work Areas, Staging Areas, and Site Access 18 Preliminary Traffic Control Improvements 19 Miscellaneous Cleanup Areas 20 Monitoring Well Network Modifications 21 Northwest Operations Area (OU #1/AOC #2) Demolition Plan 22 Northwest Operations Area (OU #1/AOC #2) Cap Grading Plan 23 Northwest Operations Area (OU #1/AOC #2) Section A-A’ 24 Northwest Operations Area (OU #1/AOC #2) Section B-B’ Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page vi San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 25 Northwest Operations Area (OU #1/AOC #2) Section C-C’ 26 Northwest Operations Area (OU #1/AOC #2) Section D-D’ 27 Typical Survey Monument 28 Reservoir 5 (OU #2) Demolition Plan 29 Reservoir 7 (OU #2) Demolition Plan 30 Reservoir 5 (OU #2) Cap Grading Plan 31 Reservoir 7 (OU #2) Cap Grading Plan 32 Reservoirs 5 and 7 (OU #2) Typical Section 33 Reservoirs 5 and 7 (OU #2) Typical Cap Details 34 Reservoir 4 (OU #3), Flower Mound, and Borrow No. 2 Work Areas 35 Reservoir 4 (OU #3) Demolition Plan 36 Flower Mound Demolition Plan 37 Reservoir 4 (OU #3) Excavation and Geotextile Placement Plan 38 Reservoir 4 (OU #3) Cap Grading Plan 39 Borrow Area No. 2 Grading Plan 40 Reservoir 4 (OU #3) Typical Cap Section and Details 41 North Marsh (OU #3/AOC #1) Demolition and Excavation Plan 42 Reservoir 3 (OU #3/AOC #2) Demolition and Excavation Plan 43 Reservoir 3 (OU #3/AOC #2) Grading Plan 44 Reservoir 3 (OU #3/AOC #2) Typical Section 45 Other PPSH-Impacted Areas 46 Areas of Habitat Impact 47 Preliminary Schedule Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page vii San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AASP San Luis Obispo Airport Area Specific Plan amsl above mean sea level AOC area of concern APCO Air Pollution Control Officer ARB Air Resources Board AST aboveground storage tank ASTM ASTM International bgs below ground surface BMP Best Management Practice BTEX benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes Cal/OSHA California Division of Occupational Safety and Health CD compact disc CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act EC engineering control ERWG Ecological Risk Working Group FEIR Final Environmental Impact Report FML flexible membrane liner FS Feasibility Study GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System HDPE high density polyethylene HHRA Human Health Risk Assessment HHRWG Human Health Risk Working Group IC institutional control LNAPL light nonaqueous-phase liquid MCL maximum contaminant level MRP Monitoring and Reporting Program NCP National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan NHIS Non-hazardous Hydrocarbon Impacted Soils OSHA U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration OU operable unit PAH polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon PDF portable document format PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company PVC polyvinyl chloride RAP Remedial Action Plan RPZ runway protection zone RTP Remediation Technology Panel RWQCB California Regional Water Quality Control Board SERRT Surface Evaluation, Remediation and Restoration Team Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page viii San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 SLO San Luis Obispo SLOAPCD San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan TEPH total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons TPH total petroleum hydrocarbons TPPH total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons µg/L microgram per liter USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UST underground storage tank VPFS vernal pool fairy shrimp Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 1 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 1.0 INTRODUCTION Chevron 1 owns an approximate 332-acre former tank farm property south of the city of San Luis Obispo (Figure 1), in San Luis Obispo County, which was constructed in 1910 to serve as the accumulation point for a petroleum pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. This property, commonly referred to as the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, SLO Tank Farm, or Tank Farm, was slowly withdrawn from operation during the later decades of the twentieth century, and by the late 1990s, was formally decommissioned. A long history of industrial activity on the property, however, has affected its environmental condition. Chevron now intends to remediate the property and convert it to alternative uses that are consistent with local planning, community needs, good environmental stewardship, regulatory requirements, and efficient asset management. On March 15, 2007, Avocet Environmental, Inc. (Avocet) published the Feasibility Study, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm (FS) addressing the nature of the environmental impacts and recommending a set of preferred remedial alternatives. A Revised Remedial Action Plan (RAP), dated August 13, 2014, was prepared to incorporate the final project description from the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and update the anticipated implementation of the preferred remedial alternatives. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) provided the August 2014 Revised RAP to agencies for a final review. Comments were received from three agencies: County of San Luis Obispo Health Agency, Public Health Department County of San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response Appendix N includes correspondence and matrices with response to comments from each of the three agencies. The project description and details in this RAP will be further refined as detailed engineering plans are prepared and land use and construction/grading permits are processed. The engineering plans for remedial actions will be reviewed with the RWQCB prior to implementation. 1.1 REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN PURPOSE AND FRAMEWORK This RAP is intended to provide federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, the municipalities with jurisdiction over the site, and other stakeholders detailed information on how Chevron will implement the preferred remedial alternative from the FS. It provides preliminary detailed engineering, which is the basis for design of the preferred remedial alternative components. It also 1 This property is owned and was originally operated by Union Oil Company of California (Union Oil). Chevron acquired Union Oil, including this property, in August 2005. Chevron personnel manage this project and “Chevron” is used interchangeably with Union Oil in this document. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 2 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 provides conceptual-level information on ecosystem restoration to support preparation of the grading plans, which will be necessary to permit this project. This document is built upon a foundation of cooperative agreements and extensive vetting with the regulatory community, stakeholders, and local municipalities. As with the FS, the RAP has followed the general framework for developing site remediation documents found in the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). It has been adapted, however, to meet the needs of a non-CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) site regulated by local agencies. Working cooperatively with the various agencies to develop this plan has resulted in an approach with broad consensus and support. Nevertheless, it is understood that approvals and permits must be granted by these agencies independent of the cooperative process. Chevron will work with the regulatory agencies and municipalities to obtain the permits and approvals required to conduct remediation at the site. This RAP describes the remedial actions in detail and also includes information for activities that support or will be done in conjunction with remediation, but are not remedial actions themselves. A primary purpose of the RAP is to define the remedial actions to be considered and approved by the RWQCB. Although this RAP discusses the supporting and concurrent activities, the scope of the RWQCB approval is limited to the remedial actions, which are summarized in Table 1. 1.2 SCOPE OF THE REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN Ecological risks are the basis of remedial actions in the open space areas. Where remediation coincides with developable areas, the remedial approach ensures compatibility with allowable uses. This report provides the reader with a brief background of the site, its current condition, and an overview of the operable units (OUs) and the associated preferred remedies developed in the FS. Subsequent sections of the report describe implementation of those remedies and present the supporting engineering analyses. Preliminary engineering drawings and specifications are included in the appendices. The drawings, which are presented as portable document format (PDF) files on the CD in Appendix A, are included as both Arch D (24” x 36”) and tabloid (11” x 17”) size format. This RAP also describes closure activities that were not relevant to the FS, such as the approach for abandoning pipelines or demolishing structures. These closure activities were not identified as critical for evaluation in the FS or previous risk management documents, since they do not pose a direct threat to human or ecological receptors. They are included in this RAP, as they affect implementation of the remedies and how they will be conducted. After publication of the FS, further environmental studies as well as an extension of Runway 11-29 at the nearby San Luis Obispo Regional Airport (Figure 1) resulted in some modifications to the implementation approach proposed in the 2007 RAP (Avocet, December 18, 2007). The 2007 Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 3 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 RAP provided the basis for a project evaluation, Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project, and the FEIR, prepared by Marine Research Specialists, dated December 2013, SCH #2009031001. This Revised RAP updates the remedial aspects of the project as outlined in the FEIR project description, evaluation, and mitigation measures. The project requires changes to the City of San Luis Obispo’s existing Airport Area Specific Plan AASP] 2005) to incorporate the proposed land uses, which are a combination of restoration, open space, and development. This report provides a brief overview of long-term maintenance items. It describes the general activities that will be performed to ensure continued achievement of the remedial objectives. The report also discusses the alternatives under consideration for future management of open space. While the primary objective of this process has been to protect human and ecological receptors from exposure to potentially harmful substances, a secondary objective has been to maintain and, if possible, improve the function of various ecosystems and/or habitats that occur on the SLO Tank Farm site. Key among these are the wetlands and other waters, vernal pool fairy shrimp (VPFS), and rare plant habitats. The RAP provides preliminary information regarding the areas of these various habitats anticipated to be impacted by project activities. The specific impacts will be evaluated at the time of project implementation and requirements for habitat restoration and mitigation will be determined in an agency-approved Restoration Plan. 1.3 OTHER PLANS The RAP has been prepared to accompany other plans and guiding documents for remediation, restoration, and permitting of this site. Other plans that support the RAP, which are either included as appendices to this report or are incorporated in the Project Execution Plan (Padre, 2007b), are conceptual or draft and will be finalized as needed for project permitting and implementation. Documents that are discussed in the text include the Geotechnical Report (Padre, 2007a) and Land Use Covenants. The Geotechnical Report supports the engineering basis for the cap designs. Land Use Covenants are restrictions on the property recorded with the deed, making the requirements binding upon future property owners. Specific Land Use Covenants will be developed for each property by Chevron legal representatives and will be provided to the RWQCB for review in consultation with the County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Services, concurrence, and signature, as needed. 1.4 FINAL CERTIFICATION REPORT Once remediation is complete, Chevron will submit a report documenting that the remedial action objectives of this plan were met. It is anticipated that reports will be provided for individual areas of the site as the remedial actions are completed in each area. For development areas, the report(s) will include applicable post-remediation soil gas sampling (a work plan will be submitted prior to beginning the work) and, based on sampling results, any recommended land use covenants and engineering controls for specific parcels. Approval of the land use covenants will be coordinated Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 4 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 through the RWQCB. Those parts of the covenants dealing with vapor intrusion issues will be referred to the local agency with jurisdiction. Once the report is approved and the land use covenants are recorded the RWQCB will issue a letter of concurrence that the remedial actions for the area addressed in the report were properly implemented. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 5 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION The following section is intended to quickly acquaint the reader with the history, operations, and general background information pertaining to the SLO Tank Farm. Information presented herein is largely taken from the background discussion provided in the FS, but has been edited and is a somewhat more brief summary. Readers desiring more detailed information are referred to the FS and other background documents listed in the References section of this report. Chevron’s approximately 332-acre Tank Farm is located at 276 Tank Farm Road in western San Luis Obispo County, south of the city of San Luis Obispo and northwest of the municipal airport Figure 1). The site is divided into north and south sections by Tank Farm Road, and is bordered by light commercial and industrial development, the San Luis Obispo County airport, agricultural and pastoral lands, with scattered residences and a trailer park. The existing buildings in the northwest part of the site currently serve as Chevron’s local offices for a variety of environmental and remediation operations (Figure 2). From 1910 until the early 1980s, the SLO Tank Farm was used for storing crude oil transported via pipeline from the San Joaquin Valley. Storage facilities at the site included 6 large earthen reservoirs, ranging in capacity between 775,000 and 1,350,000 barrels2, and 21 steel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) capable of holding 55,000 barrels each. The reservoirs were constructed by excavating a circular or elliptical depression, which was then lined with wire-mesh-reinforced 2 One barrel is equivalent to 42 gallons. Construction of Reservoir 4 – August 25, 1910 Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 6 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 concrete. The walls were also reinforced concrete, but were constructed either vertically or integrated into the sloping sides of the depression. The walls and floors of the ASTs were constructed of heavy plate steel secured with rivets. The roofs of both the reservoirs and ASTs were of wood and composition. All told, the site had the capacity to store over 6 million barrels of petroleum. On April 7, 1926, a lightning strike ignited a fire at the Tank Farm. At that time, there were 933,577 barrels of oil stored in the ASTs, and another 5,374,927 barrels of oil were stored in the reservoirs. The total inventory was 6,308,504 barrels of oil of various grades. Eyewitnesses claim that a lightning strike simultaneously ignited the vapors in Reservoirs 5, 6, and 7. The power of the resulting explosion registered on the Weather Bureau barograph in downtown San Luis Obispo, which recorded the time as 7:35 a.m. A second lightning strike ignited Reservoir 3 sometime between 7:50 and 7:55 a.m. Despite suppression efforts by the facility staff, the fire spread to the other reservoirs and to 12 of the existing 15 steel ASTs over the course of the next four days by a combination of burning embers and boil-overs, where the heated oil flowed out of the reservoirs and onto the ground surrounding the tanks. By April 11, 1926, all but a few thousand of the six million barrels in inventory had been burned to coke and spread across the site. This release is considered responsible for most of the numerous surface occurrences (i.e., expressions) of highly weathered and burned petroleum that cover the ground in topographically low areas of the Tank Farm. Morning of April 9, 1926. Reservoir 4 (left) has been extinguished. Reservoir 2 and ASTs (right) are still burning. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 7 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Subsequent to the 1926 fire, Union Oil resumed operations at the Tank Farm, including reconstructing ten of the steel ASTs and four of the reservoirs (Reservoirs 3, 4, 5, and 6). Reservoirs 2 and 7 were never again used for petroleum storage. The reconstruction effort included expanding the fire breaks and enlarging the containment areas surrounding the reservoirs, which created numerous hydraulically closed depressions around the site. Many of these depressions subsequently ponded and became wetlands. In addition to the 6 reservoirs and 21 ASTs utilized for petroleum storage, the facility included a series of pipelines for oil movement to and from the site and for movement between the onsite tanks and facilities. Regional pipeline operations were also conducted at the site, primarily from the northwest area of the property (Northwest Operations Area; Figure 3). Facilities to support pipeline operations included a pumphouse, boilers (for heating crude oil to reduce viscosity) and an associated blow-down area, a petroleum physical properties testing laboratory, and an electrical equipment house (Figure 3). The Northwest Operations Area also included areas for general equipment storage and maintenance, as well as underground storage tanks (USTs) that contained diesel fuel and gasoline (England, Shahin & Associates, May 11, 1994). The USTs were removed in 1987. Other historical activities at the site include the operation of a fire training school in the unpaved eastern portion of the Northwest Operations Area (Figure 3). The school consisted of several simulated sumps, flares, and tanks where students would practice techniques for extinguishing petroleum-fed fires. Off-specification gasoline and diesel fuel were fed to these fixtures from a set of three ASTs via a system of buried metal pipes. The four reservoirs repaired after the 1926 fire continued in service for several more decades, but were progressively decommissioned beginning in the late 1950s and continuing into the mid- 1970s, according to the following schedule: Reservoir Date Decommissioned 5 1959 3 1961 6 1961 4 1976 Field evidence suggests that decommissioning involved emptying the reservoirs of liquid petroleum and removing the roofs and, at Reservoirs 3 and 4, the vertical walls. The reinforced concrete covering the sloping slides and bottoms was left in place. In Reservoirs 2, 5, and 7, there is evidence that the concrete bottoms were ripped by the shank of a bulldozer in perpendicular directions. The bottoms of the remaining reservoirs have not been directly observed, so it is uncertain whether these have been similarly ripped. It is anecdotally reported that the ripping was done to prevent water from accumulating in the former reservoirs. Reservoirs 3 and 4 were largely backfilled by bulldozing the berms into the center of the reservoirs. Reservoir 4 generally contains 5 to 6 feet of non-engineered fill and construction debris above the concrete bottom, and Reservoir Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 8 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 3 is estimated to contain between 8 and 11 feet of non-engineered fill. To provide access, a portion of the berms surrounding Reservoirs 5, 6, and 7 has been pushed into the reservoirs. Approximately 1.5 feet of non-engineered fill and construction debris cover the bottoms of Reservoirs 5 and 6, and in Reservoir 7 the berm debris was not distributed evenly across the reservoir bottom, but rather was left as an apron near the notch. Most of the bottom of Reservoir 7 is covered by several inches of interlayered tar and organic debris. A review of historical aerial photographs shows that the ten steel ASTs remaining or rebuilt after the 1926 fire were decommissioned at various times. AST 522, located in the Northwest Operations Area, was removed sometime between 1959 and 1965. Eight of the nine remaining ASTs were removed in 1994, with the last AST being reserved for fire water storage. The final AST was removed in August 2000. Fire school exercises were suspended at the Tank Farm in the 1970s and transferred to the Richmond refinery. The pumphouse, pipelines, and boilers were taken out of service in the early 1990s and were demolished or decommissioned in the late 1990s. Of the original Tank Farm structures, only three buildings in the operation remain. For several years, approximately 2 acres of land near the center of the property north of Tank Farm Road were leased to a recycling company. The site was used as a transfer station and accumulation point for recyclable materials such as paper, glass, and aluminum. The operation was shut down and removed in mid-2000, when the lease expired, and was not renewed (England Geosystem, April 17, 2001). 2.1 CURRENT CONDITION Aside from the current Chevron office buildings situated in the northwestern portion of the property, the site presently consists of undeveloped land that supports native grasslands, riparian areas, and riverine, depressional, and other wetland areas (waters/wetlands) (Figure 2). The site is best characterized as open space, with cattle grazing for the purpose of fire prevention and weed control. Adjacent land uses include light commercial and industrial development, the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport, agricultural and pastoral land with scattered residences, and a trailer park. The northeast corner of the site has been referred to as the Flower Mound and is an approximately 17.3-acre outcrop of the basement bedrock complex known as the Franciscan Formation Figure 2). Typically referred to as the “Franciscan mélange,” the Franciscan Formation is comprised of a complex collection of various rock types. Although the Franciscan Formation found at the Tank Farm includes localized occurrences of coarse to fine-grained clastic sedimentary rocks, it more commonly consists of highly fractured and weathered metavolcanic rocks and serpentinite. Some modifications and improvements have been made to the Northwest Operations Area since the last petroleum-dedicated ASTs were decommissioned in 1994. These include upgrades to the front gate, the addition of a modular office building adjacent to the northernmost original building, a new fire water tank to replace the water storage AST decommissioned in 2000, and various upgrades to the electrical and telecommunication systems (Figure 3). Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 9 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 2.1.1 Offsite Utilities Utility companies as well as local municipalities provide natural gas, electricity, telecommunication, and sewer service to the site or have lines that cross the site. The locations of these lines and easements are shown in Figure 4. The Gas Company owns a 4-inch diameter gas line located just north of Tank Farm Road. The line is buried in the shoulder of the road and terminates approximately 400 feet from the west boundary of the Northwest Operations Area. A 2-inch diameter gas line tees off the main and runs underground along the western property line for approximately 500 feet. That branch line provides natural gas service to the Northwest Operations area. Aerial lines also run parallel to Tank Farm Road, offset to the north approximately 100 feet from the road centerline. The aerial lines include electrical power provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and telecommunications service provided by AT&T. Electricity and telecommunications services also branch off the main lines at the west boundary of the Northwest Operations area, run along the western property line, and serve the ongoing operations. 2.1.2 Operations Related Pipelines Historical operations at the site were served by approximately 25,125 feet of crude oil pipeline, 47,340 feet of water supply line, and 1,172 feet of other pipeline. The approximate locations of these lines are shown in Figure 5. The analyses supporting the estimated lengths of pipeline are found in Appendix L. It is believed that most of the lines were abandoned in place, although it is reported anecdotally that much of the pipeline serving the ASTs was removed when the tanks were removed. Since there is no record of final cleaning or abandonment procedures, it is presumed that at least some of the lines still contain crude oil. Crude oil pipelines vary in diameter from 8 to 16 inches. It appears that the most common diameter is 8 inches, and using this as a nominal diameter for the entire network suggests that the crude oil pipeline volume is on the order of 16,750 cubic feet. It is unlikely, however, that this volume of oil remains in the lines. Many of the lines are demonstrably empty where they are exposed on the surface. Much of the facility piping is found in the Northwest Operations Area, as shown in Figure 6. This includes nearly 20 percent of the total crude oil pipe network (approximately 4,300 lineal feet). This configuration allowed the operators to direct oil in and out of the facility and to transfer oil between the various storage locations as needed. There are also 4,900 feet of water line, 1,120 feet of dedicated Foamite fire-fighting lines, and leach and drain lines totaling slightly less than 1,200 feet. The estimated volume of the crude oil lines in the Northwest Operations Area is approximately 3,260 cubic feet. 2.1.3 Potential Land Use After remediation, Chevron intends to convert the site to new uses consistent with the revised land use plans for the area. As noted previously in this report, the site is within unincorporated San Luis Obispo county; however, annexation of the Tank Farm into the City as part of the AASP (City of San Luis Obispo, 2005) may occur. Chevron is working with the City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, and other stakeholders to ensure that the relevant land use plans and proposed reuse are aligned. The SLO County General Plan envisions future development on portions of the Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 10 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Tank Farm (Figure 7). Potential land uses for the site under the City plan are shown in Figures 8 and 10 and detailed discussions can be found in Section 2.0 of the FEIR. Regardless of whether the Tank Farm remains within San Luis Obispo County or becomes annexed into the City of San Luis Obispo, remediation of the site will support the appropriate land use plans. Cattle grazing may continue in the grassland areas of the future open space. Cattle are effective at controlling invasive weeds and limiting the fuel available to a potential fire. It is expected that cattle grazing would be excluded from upland and wetland restoration areas, but specific requirements for continued cattle grazing will be coordinated with the Open Space Manager, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS), and other appropriate agencies. 2.2 SITE HYDROLOGY Regionally, the Tank Farm is within the Central Coast Hydrologic Area, a 6,600-square-mile watershed that extends from Santa Barbara to the upper reaches of the Nacimiento River. More specifically, the site is within the San Luis Obispo Hydrologic Subunit, a 44,370-acre component of the larger San Luis Obispo Hydrologic Unit. The boundaries of these watersheds have been defined by the California Department of Water Resources and are illustrated in Appendix G. Locally, the Tank Farm is situated north of the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek, which is tributary to San Luis Obispo Creek, and is illustrated in Figure 11. A small portion of the Tank Farm discharges to this creek directly, referred to as Design Point B on Figure 11. However, most of the Tank Farm consists of a closed catchment that retains storm water. This is a legacy of the historical containment structures and other topographic modifications that were made to facilitate operations. Ditches along Tank Farm Road collect storm water from the frontage properties. A local high point is located approximately 1,000 feet east of Higuera Road. Storm water collected east of this point drains toward the Tank Farm and eventually discharges into the North Marsh wetland complex (Figure 2). A small channel, referred to by the City of San Luis Obispo as Tank Farm Creek, is located on the western side of the property and collects storm water from a catchment approximately 485 acres in size, including about 150 acres that are on the Tank Farm proper. Tank Farm Creek discharges from the site at a concrete outlet works labeled Design Point A on Figure 11. Much of that catchment is located north of the Tank Farm and currently enters the site as sheet flow, or concentrated into natural channels, along the northern property line. Recent development plans and construction in the Margarita Area north of the Tank Farm have changed the upgradient hydrology slightly and have concentrated flow at the discharge location of a newly constructed detention basin just north of the northwest corner of the site. Drainage from this basin flows into the North Marsh, where it is stored and released to the south side of Tank Farm Road through a series of culverts. Remediation and grading on the east side of the property will also affect drainage into the North Marsh. Anticipated changes to the onsite hydrologic system Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 11 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 as a result of remedial activities are discussed in subsequent chapters. Remediation and restoration of the North Marsh may require further changes to the site hydrology. The details of these changes will be developed as the Restoration Plan is finalized in conjunction with the regulatory agencies. The natural retention capacity of the onsite waters/wetlands will be more than adequate to address any foreseeable hydrologic changes (Avocet, 2009). 2.3 WETLANDS AND RARE PLANT HABITAT The Tank Farm currently hosts waters/wetlands and rare plant habitats (Figure 12). Much of the waters/wetlands ecosystems habitat has been established from the closed hydrologic conditions onsite that are artifacts of the containment and fire suppression controls constructed after the 1926 fire. Several delineations of the waters/wetlands have been accompanied by supporting scientific studies. This report focuses on the most current delineation, which includes Federal Wetlands those that are federally jurisdictional) as well as Other Wetlands (those that are isolated and not federally jurisdictional). As described in the FEIR project description, the most recent delineation identified approximately 73.2 acres of Other Wetlands (incorporating approximately 49 acres of Federal Wetlands and approximately 3.9 acres categorized as Other Waters of the U.S.). This total also includes approximately 32.6 acres of VPFS habitat. In addition, the site supports several other rare plant habitats that are identified in Figure 12. Wetland delineation and existing VPFS habitat will be further discussed in the Restoration Plan to be submitted to the resource agencies for review and approval. Remediation activities at the site will impact existing wetlands and other ecological resources. Estimated impacts to those resources and their associated mitigation, as required by the FEIR, will be discussed in detail in the Restoration Plan. It is possible that waters/wetlands, VPFS habitat, and rare plant community estimates will change with subsequent surveys and conditions in the field during project implementation. Modifications to these surveys will be addressed as part of the onsite monitoring and restoration efforts. 2.4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION SUMMARY Considerable effort has been expended to characterize the impacts due to historical industrial operations at the site. The following is offered as a brief summary to orient the reader who is not otherwise familiar with that characterization work. It focuses on those portions of the characterization that are most relevant to the remedial action, including the key soil and water impacts, waters/wetlands, VPFS, and rare plant habitats, and the environmental impacts considered pertinent to risk management. For those readers desiring more detailed information on the site characterization efforts, the documents listed in the reference section are useful. Given that petroleum storage and handling facilities operated on the property for many decades, it is not surprising that environmental issues at the site are generally petroleum-related. Crude oil is found in soil as deep as 60 feet below the ground surface (bgs). Oil is also seen in surface expressions ranging from solid asphalt-like coke to viscous liquid. The locations and nature of these impacts are shown in Figure 13. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 12 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Characterization of these impacts has included, in addition to their careful identification and delineation, an evaluation of their importance relative to human and ecological health, and the need for their remediation. Key to this effort has been the cooperative process between Chevron and the regulatory community that has progressively reviewed existing data, evaluated assessments, identified data gaps, established the risk associated with a given impact, and determined which impacts require remediation. In order to validate the characterization process, Chevron entered into two cooperative programs resulting in regulatory agency participation and third-party expert review: the Remediation Technology Panel (RTP) and the Surface Evaluation, Remediation and Restoration Team SERRT). The first of these collaborative processes, the RTP, was established through a cooperative agreement between Chevron and the RWQCB. The RTP consisted of three experts drawn from academia with expertise in the characterization and remediation of petroleum-affected sites, whose purview focused on soil- and groundwater-related issues. They identified data gaps within the existing site characterization, guided and reviewed subsequent characterization activities, and published a report summarizing their consensus understanding of subsurface issues at the site RTP, 2006). A key finding of that report was that petroleum in the subsurface was effectively immobile and that the migration of dissolved-phase constituents was controlled by natural biodegradation processes. This finding, which was supported by a specific evaluation of natural attenuation processes, formed the basis of evaluating monitored natural attenuation as an appropriate remedial technology for impacted groundwater. The second of the cooperative efforts, the SERRT, was established in 2002 at the suggestion of staff at the RWQCB. This action was suggested in recognition of findings of studies that detailed the extent of sensitive resources on the site, and the subsequent desire to consider a risk-based remediation program for the property. As part of the SERRT process, Chevron, regulatory agencies, and local municipalities have reviewed data, evaluated source, and determined the extent of the remediation required for the site. The SERRT formed two subgroups, the Human Health Risk Working Group (HHRWG) and the Ecological Risk Working Group (ERWG). Both groups included Chevron, its representatives and consultants, and the RWQCB. In addition, the HHRWG included representatives from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Division, and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District SLOAPCD). The ERWG in addition included representatives from the City, the County Planning Department, CDFW, USFWS, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition to preparing reports documenting the Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) and Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment, the SERRT prepared a consensus summary document listing its recommendations for risk management at the site, the Risk Management Summary Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 13 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 BBL, 2005). In order to focus risk assessment efforts, certain areas of the site, mainly those affected by liquid or plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions, were excluded from the risk assessments with the understanding that remediation of those areas was a “must,” and Chevron would undertake remediation there without the need for further detailed characterization or assessment. Lead exceeding the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program 1,000 mg/kg threshold for areas where children may be present” was found in two shallow soil samples. The SERRT recognized that these two exceedances were in VPFS habitat. They also determined that the two lead soil exceedances are in areas of ecological habitat where young children are unlikely to be exposed. With these two considerations, the consensus of the SERRT was that the risk of exposure was so low that it did not warrant disturbing an established habitat for protected species. There were no other areas where lead was a concern, so it was not carried forward for remedial action in the RAP. The culmination of Chevron’s characterization efforts was the Risk Management Summary, which identified the contamination at the site requires remediation. The SERRT ratified the Risk Management Summary on December 12, 2005. The Risk Management Summary also provided recommendations on treatment strategies based on levels and types of contamination, the potential ecological risks, and the potential impacts of clean-up. Contamination requiring remediation included surface liquid hydrocarbons impacting seasonal wetlands in Reservoirs 5 and 7, plastic surface hydrocarbons found across the site (mostly in low-lying areas), groundwater affected by light nonaqueous-phase liquid (LNAPL) and benzene, arsenic in soil, asphalt affecting wetlands, and the potential for vapor intrusion to affect buildings. Based upon the Risk Management Summary, an FS was conducted that considered remedial activities that supported development consistent with the land use plans available at that time. The FS evaluated various remedial alternatives that addressed site contamination issues and selected a preferred remedy. The study was ratified by the SERRT on March 15, 2007. Following are the principal impacts identified in the various site studies, RTP report, or Risk Management Plan that were further evaluated in the FS as well as studies developed subsequent to the publication of the FS, including the updated Human Health Risk Assessment (uHHRA; McDaniel Lambert, 2013). Liquid hydrocarbon surface expressions (red areas in Figure 13) impacting the wetlands in the bottom of Reservoirs 5 and 7. Plastic surface hydrocarbon expressions (purple areas in Figure 13) found across the site, but predominantly in low-lying areas (e.g., North Marsh, Reservoir 3) that pose an entrapment hazard to small animals. Groundwater affected by LNAPL and benzene beneath the Northwest Operations area. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 14 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Arsenic in shallow soil in and north of the Northwest Operations Area and northeast of Reservoir 2. The potential for methane, hydrogen sulfide, and benzene to affect habitable structures. 2.5 UPDATED HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT UPDATE The HHRA was updated in 2013 (uHHRA). The uHHRA built on the process agreed upon by the SERRT during the preparation of the 2004 Baseline HHRA, with modifications related to incorporation of additional characterization data, the Development Plan exposure areas, and relevant updates in risk assessment methodologies and toxicity factors. The update did not result in significant changes to remedial actions already established. The results of the uHHRA are summarized in Table ES-1, Summary of Potential Health Effects Associated with Development Areas, included in Appendix O. Also included in Appendix O are determination letters from the RWQCB, State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, and San Luis Obispo County Health Agency, all of which were included in an appendix of the FEIR. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 15 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 3.0 OPERABLE UNITS, AREAS OF CONCERN, AND THE INTEGRATED PREFERRED REMEDY Once the SERRT had reached a consensus on the objectives of remediation, it was necessary to evaluate methods for achieving those goals. Chevron elected to generally follow the procedure outlined in the NCP, which establishes the framework for evaluation of remedial actions used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This procedure provided a transparent and credible evaluation process for selecting remedial alternatives that was familiar to the regulatory community. Through that process, five OUs were developed for the Tank Farm. The four terrestrial OUs are shown in Figure 14 (OU #5, site-wide groundwater, is not depicted). A brief description of each OU is provided in the sections below and is accompanied by a discussion of the associated preferred remedy. These descriptions are largely taken from the FS but have been edited to reflect the current plan to pursue the development options where applicable, and to reflect refinement of the AASP (City of San Luis Obispo, 2005) land use zones. Detailed proposals for implementing the preferred remedies are provided in Sections 4 through 7. A summary list of the operable units, areas of concern, the relevant constituents of concern, and the preferred remedies is provided in Table 1. As part of the preferred remedies, institutional and engineering controls (ICs and ECs) are proposed to achieve the remediation goals. The various ICs and ECs applicable to specific locations are listed in Table 1. They are summarized below and will be further discussed later in this report. Institutional Controls (ICs): Groundwater Use Restrictions – Recorded as negative covenants in the county records, and would limit or prohibit uses of groundwater under parcels in identified areas. This may be accomplished in a standalone document(s) and/or as part of the deed(s) at the time of conveyance. Use Restrictions – Recorded as negative covenants in the county records, and would limit the land use of specified parcels to specific purposes, in this case commercial, industrial, or open space only. This may be accomplished in a standalone document(s) and/or as part of the deed(s) at the time of conveyance. Notice of Subsurface Chemicals of Concern – Disclosures recorded in the county records, and would notify all future landowners of present areas where subsurface chemicals of concern are located to minimize the potential for future exposures through soil excavation or disturbance. This may be accomplished in a standalone document(s) and/or as part of the deed(s) at the time of conveyance. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 16 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Engineering Controls (ECs): Vapor Barriers – Would be required for any new occupied building/structure constructed in development areas where vapors from residual contamination could be generated. Options will include construction on a raised foundation or, if constructed at grade, a vapor barrier or other appropriate engineering controls. Vapor barriers are further discussed in Section 6.9. 3.1 OU #1- FORMER NW OPERATIONS AREA OU #1 encompasses approximately 5 acres in the northwest area of the site. Historically, this area was used to support tank farm and pipeline operations and included equipment and processes not found across the remainder of the site. Consequently, this area is affected, at least in part, by a unique group of contaminants, namely arsenic in shallow soil and LNAPL with a significant lighter fraction, including benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), in the saturated zone. In addition, this area of the site is designated both by the City and San Luis Obispo County for potential commercial development (Figure 7, Figure 8, and Figure 10). Although the area zoned for commercial development in either land use plan includes all or portions of the northwest corner of the property, including the former AST containment berms, the area of OU #1 excludes the AST berms due to the VPFS habitat that they support (Figure 12). An additional concern to this operable unit is that it lies within the 100-year floodplain (Figure 9), which affects how development can be implemented. OU #1 includes two media-focused areas of concern (AOCs), groundwater (AOC #1) and soil AOC #2). As stated previously, due to a set of conditions unique to the Northwest Operations Area, the LNAPL in the saturated zone also contains a light fraction (C5-C20), including benzene. This light fraction is responsible for the Northwest Operations Area being the only area of the site identified by the RTP where groundwater containing dissolved contaminants (total petroleum hydrocarbons [TPH] and benzene) at concentrations greater than maximum contaminant levels (or frequently applied action levels) has migrated offsite. The LNAPL impact in the Northwest Operations Area covers an area approximately 600 feet long by 300 feet wide and ranges in depth from 4 to 28 feet bgs (Figure 14). The light fraction co-occurs with, and is dissolved in, the heavier oil. Light-end hydrocarbons, including BTEX, are hundreds of times more soluble in oil than in water. Therefore, this light fraction would be difficult to remove without also removing the heavier residual oil. In the Northwest Operations Area, groundwater typically occurs at depths ranging from 5 to 15 feet bgs. Benzene is the most toxic constituent of BTEX and its presence in soil, groundwater, and soil gas has the potential to pose the greatest potential risk to future users of the site. The FS describes the circumstances surrounding the presence and discovery of the BTEX in detail. In summary, it was determined that the BTEX does not pose a significant risk to building occupants, provided adequate ICs and ECs (e.g., vapor barrier requirements) are in place. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 17 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 AOC #2 includes shallow soil in OU #1, which is impacted by arsenic and, to a more limited extent, by TPH and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and deeper (4 to 28 feet bgs) soil impacted by the above-described LNAPL. Within the operable unit, the arsenic is relatively widespread and limited to shallow (<2 feet) soil, which is consistent with its likely use as an herbicide. Although not relevant to the development plans considered in this report, the metals and PAHs have been identified as potential ecological risks and there could be issues if the area were converted to open space3. However, the proposed remedial cap will address this ecological risk issue. The arsenic was identified as a potential human health risk for both open space and commercial development land uses. It is assumed that the entire operable unit is impacted with arsenic, subject to remediation given the available spatial distribution of data. AOC #2 was subsequently expanded to include arsenic in an adjacent area approximately 0.21 acre in size immediately north of the Northwest Operations Area (see Appendix K). 3.1.1 AOC #1 - Groundwater It has been demonstrated that benzene dissolved in groundwater has historically migrated offsite in the vicinity of Well SLOW-12, but rapidly attenuates and does not appear to threaten downgradient water wells. The remedial action objectives for OU #1/AOC #1 established in the FS are intended to prevent human contact with TPH- or benzene-impacted groundwater and ensure that groundwater resources downgradient of existing impacts are not affected. Given that the LNAPL is stable and unrecoverable, the dissolved phase is naturally contained, there is no evidence of hydrocarbon impacts to downgradient groundwater beneficial uses, and groundwater in the airport area is not used for drinking, it was concluded that monitored natural attenuation is sufficiently protective to be adopted as the long-term remedy for groundwater in OU #1/AOC #1. Therefore, the preferred remedial alternative for AOC #1 is monitored natural attenuation with ICs, ECs and long-term monitoring. Monitored natural attenuation includes the following: Semiannual sampling of the existing groundwater monitoring network on and surrounding AOC #1; Testing those samples for total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (TEPH), total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPPH), BTEX, and natural attenuation parameters; Reporting findings to the RWQCB in accordance with an approved monitoring and reporting program. The proposed ICs and ECs for this OU are summarized in Table 1. 3 In its present condition, the Northwest Operations Area was not considered suitable habitat in the pERA. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 18 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 3.1.2 AOC #2 - Soil AOC #2 includes shallow soil, which is impacted by arsenic and, to a more limited extent, by TPH and PAHs, and deeper (4 to 28 feet bgs) soil impacted by LNAPL containing a light fraction. The arsenic is relatively widespread and limited to shallow (<2 feet) soil, which is consistent with its probable former use at the site as a herbicide. The arsenic and PAHs have been identified as potential threats to human and ecological receptors (if the area were converted to open space). With regard to the deeper soil, the LNAPL is not considered a direct contact risk, but vapor intrusion by the volatile fraction may pose a risk to future onsite commercial workers. Remedial action objectives are primarily focused on preventing human and eco-receptor contact with arsenic, TPH, PAHs, and volatile hydrocarbons. Since the area is to be developed, it will not support suitable ecological habitat, thereby mitigating the potential for ecological risks. Furthermore, the proposed remedial cap will address this ecological risk issue in the event development does not occur in this area. The preferred remedy for OU #1/AOC #2 includes construction of a minimum 4-foot-thick soil cap. The cap will provide a barrier between the impacted soil and potential receptors and also provide a soil layer of sufficient thickness to facilitate foundation construction and utility installation with a low potential of disturbing contaminated soil. AOC #2 was expanded to include surface removal of additional arsenic from an area north of the Northwest Operations Area. The removed arsenic-affected soil will be consolidated under the cap (see Appendix K). The Northwest Operations Area is within the 100-year flood plain associated with Tank Farm Creek. At its current grade, the southernmost structure within the Northwest Operations Area is subject to inundation during periods of moderate to heavy rain. Raising the ground elevation by 4 feet and regrading appropriately would also satisfy the requirements for construction in floodplains and help alleviate the current flooding problems. A geotextile would be placed between the cap and the existing ground surface. It would act as an identifying marker to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently excavating into the impacted soils. The cap will require long-term monitoring and maintenance, ICs, and ECs. The proposed ICs and ECs for this OU are summarized in Table 1. 3.2 OU #2- RESERVOIRS 5 AND 7 OU #2 includes the former Reservoirs 5 and 7 (Figure 14). Measured from the outside toe of the reservoir containment berms, the reservoirs cover a total area of 9.8 acres. The reservoirs contain delineated wetlands and rare plant communities. Details of wetland and rare plant community locations will be provided in the Restoration Plan. Both reservoirs pond water during the winter, with the amount of water largely dependent on the amount of rainfall. In years of heavy rainfall, it is not unusual for 2 to 3 feet of water to accumulate in the reservoirs. The reinforced concrete bottoms, though ripped, are still present in both of the reservoirs but are covered by 1 to 2 feet of tar, non-engineered fill, and construction debris. In all land use plans, Reservoirs 5 and 7 are in areas designated as Open Space. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 19 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Reservoirs 5 and 7 are unique in that they are the only areas of the site impacted by liquid-type hydrocarbon surface expressions and these are the only surface expressions that are hydraulically connected to subsurface LNAPL sources. The implication of this is that simple removal of the shallow hydrocarbon-impacted soils will not effectively remediate the sheen that seasonally develops on surface water in the reservoirs. The source of the hydrocarbon sheen is mobile hydrocarbon extending to depths of up to 25 feet below the bottom of the reservoirs, which is displaced vertically upward during periods of a rising water table. Elimination of the sheen will require either removal of the mobile hydrocarbon at depth, making that hydrocarbon immobile, or raising the bottom of the reservoirs to elevations above the seasonal water table highs (RTP, 2006). The preferred remedy caps Reservoirs 5 and 7 and provides ICs and ECs and long-term monitoring. Cap construction will involve removing existing non-engineered fill down to the existing concrete floor in each reservoir. Gravel will be placed directly on top of the existing concrete floor in each reservoir to a height of 1.5 feet above each reservoir’s historical (1990 to 2005) high water table elevation. The gravel will be covered with a layer of geotextile and a combination of common earth fill and topsoil to create the finished surface. The cap will be graded to encourage runoff, thereby minimizing water infiltration into the gravel reservoir. This approach requires removal of the existing wetlands. Mitigation for these impacts will be outlined in further detail in the Restoration Plan. Specific ICs and ECs will depend partially on the degree of public access, but are expected to include that which is summarized in Table 1 to ensure that access to the site is controlled. Long- term monitoring will include periodic inspections and maintenance (as needed) to ensure that the ICs and cap remain effective. 3.3 OU #3- RESERVOIR 4 (EAST DEVELOPMENT AREA) OU #3 includes approximately 30 acres in the eastern part of the site (Figure 14) and is also zoned for possible future commercial development (Figure 7, Figure 8, and Figure 10). This operable unit includes Reservoir 4, several surface expressions of sticky (“purple-type”) hydrocarbon that collectively cover an area of about 2.3 acres, and the former recycling center. The floor of former Reservoir 4 is covered with 5 to 6 feet of non-engineered, hydrocarbon-impacted soil and construction debris. The Risk Management Summary (BBL Sciences [BBL], 2005) recommended that soil within Reservoir 4 be left in place with no further action, assuming that the area remains as open space. Due to the entrapment hazard posed by the sticky hydrocarbon surface expressions, however, these areas, together with some proximal “blue”- and “green”-type expressions that are not physical hazards, were identified by the ERWG for remediation. OU #3 contains several small areas of wetlands and rare plant communities, which will be described in the Restoration Plan. The ERWG also determined in 2005 that the former recycling center does not currently provide suitable ecological habitat because it is paved and may be developed in the future. As such, the Risk Management Summary concluded that no further remedial action was necessary as long as the area does not revert to open space. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 20 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 For purposes of the FS evaluation, the development scenario was defined as including all of the activities necessary to leave the operable unit in a condition such that a developer could undertake construction. For OU #3, this is potentially significant since there are several feet of non- engineered fill within Reservoir 4 anticipated to be incapable of supporting a conventional spread footing building foundation without adverse differential settlement. Consequently, the FS considered remedial alternatives that would support high foundation loads by removing and replacing the non-engineered, hydrocarbon-impacted fill within Reservoir 4, as well as development alternatives that would require minimal structural support, such as a parking lot. Weathered, high-molecular weight TPH-impacted soil extends to depths of up to 50 feet below Reservoir 4 (Figure 12). As no significant risk has been attributed to the presence of this material, and considering the impracticability of contaminant removal, remedial measures targeting this material were not considered in the FS. Subsequent to the FS, a refinement of the land uses shown in the AASP has been proposed. Consequently, the grading of the original preferred alternative was augmented to support this land use concept. The approach is at least equally effective, in that surficial hydrocarbon exposures are removed. In addition, the refined preferred alternative provides a soil cover over Reservoir 4 that is at least 4 feet thick, and as much as 11-feet thick. The cover will provide a barrier between the impacted soil and potential receptors and also sufficient structural support for future onsite construction. A geotextile identifying layer, placed between the cap and the existing ground surface, would serve to reduce the likelihood of inadvertently excavating into the impacted soils. Landscaped areas of the cover would be planted with appropriate shallow-rooted vegetation to prevent erosion without penetrating the cover as part of ICs. Construction will unavoidably impact wetlands, VPFS habitat, and rare plant communities, which will require mitigation. Details of impacts and proposed mitigation will be provided in the Restoration Plan. Since residual contamination will remain at depth, ICs and ECs will be used to minimize the potential for future onsite exposures. Proposed ICs and ECs are summarized in Table 1. Long- term monitoring will be used to assess compliance and effectiveness of the ICs and ECs. 3.4 OU #4- REMAINING SITE-WIDE TERRESTRIAL AND WATERS/WETLANDS AREAS OU #4 includes all the remaining terrestrial and waters/wetlands areas of the Tank Farm not considered in the first three OUs. OU #4 covers an area of about 270 acres, all but 24 acres of which is planned open space. Three AOCs were defined in the operable unit corresponding to must-do” areas identified by the SERRT (Figure 14). These are: AOC#1 – North Marsh (including a portion of Tank Farm Creek) Complex AOC#2 – Reservoir 3 AOC#3 – Other sticky hydrocarbon surface expressions. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 21 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 All three of these areas were identified by the SERRT due to the presence of sticky hydrocarbon surface expressions. However, the conditions surrounding the occurrence of these surface expressions in each area of concern are subtly different, necessitating separate consideration. A large amount of wetlands occur in OU #4, including areas identified as VPFS habitat. Details of existing wetland delineation and VPFS habitat will be discussed in the Restoration Plan. The OU also includes substantial coverage by a variety of rare plant communities. The Risk Management Summary also recommended two areas of surface hydrocarbon expressions surrounding Reservoir 3, which were not identified as eco-risks, for ripping to facilitate revegetation. However, ripping will be avoided in these two areas because ripping operations would impact currently occupied VPFS habitat. 3.4.1 AOC #1 - North Marsh Complex AOC# 1, the North Marsh complex, consists of waters/wetlands located east of the Northwest Operations Area. The waters/wetlands include the most extensive coverage of pliable plastic (i.e., blue” and “purple”) hydrocarbon surface expressions at the Tank Farm. When grouped into areas based on proximity, these expressions cover about 7 acres. The extent in the shallow subsurface soils, however, may be significantly larger. Based on the 1926 topography of the North Marsh complex, these surface expressions may cover as many as 13 acres. The thickness of the expressions varies but has been estimated to be 2 to 3 feet on average. Surveys of the North Marsh complex have not identified VPFS habitat. The preferred remedy is to excavate the plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions from the North Marsh complex, dispose of the impacted material offsite, and restore (reestablish and rehabilitate) remaining waters/wetlands areas. The area of excavation is estimated to be between 7 and 13 acres, with an average assumed excavation depth of 3.5 feet. Given the areas and thickness, the excavation may generate anywhere from 40,000 to 73,000 cubic yards of material. Any excavated material suitable for reuse as specified in an agency-approved Soil Management Plan would be stockpiled separately and used later as backfill for remediation or restoration activities. It is anticipated that the soil would be disposed of as nonhazardous impacted soil at the Santa Maria Landfill or another appropriate landfill. Depending on the feasibility and landfill used, trucks may haul clean material from the landfill on their return trip to be used as backfill material for the North Marsh complex. It is assumed that the upper 1 foot of backfill material would be comprised of an appropriate organic-rich topsoil, to be specified in the Restoration Plan, consisting either of clean soil from on site or imported to the site. The actual amount of topsoil required would be based on the final soil balances from remedial and restoration grading operations. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that 1 foot of topsoil will need to be imported for backfilling and restoration. Once the excavation, backfill, and final grading operations are complete, the North Marsh complex would be replanted to restore and improve waters/wetlands function and will be described in the Restoration Plan. Proposed ICs and ECs are summarized in Table 1. Long-term monitoring would include a monitoring and maintenance program to ensure that those controls remain effective. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 22 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 3.4.2 AOC #2 - Reservoir 3 AOC #2 includes 8.4 acres within the footprint of former Reservoir 3. Much of the ground surface within the former reservoir area is covered by pliable hydrocarbon surface expressions with entrapment hazard potential. Studies have demonstrated that groundwater is not responsible for the hydrocarbon surface expressions in this former reservoir. These studies have determined that viscous oil is being slowly squeezed from the mixed reservoir fill as the soil slowly settles. The reservoir is filled with 8 to 11 feet of non-engineered fill, including berm soils, construction debris, and tar. A large portion of Reservoir 3 consists of precipitation/runoff-supported wetlands that are occupied by VPFS, which will be described in the Restoration Plan. The preferred remedy consists of constructing a soil cap with an impermeable geosynthetic liner that will establish a permanent barrier between contaminated soil and potential human and eco- receptors at the surface. The cap will attempt to reestablish wetlands in the same area and will be described in the Restoration Plan. This was determined to be an acceptable approach due to the fact that historical groundwater elevations suggest that Reservoir 3 is not fed by groundwater. Conceptually, the cap will be constructed by removing a minimum amount of hydrocarbon- impacted soil so that the cap can be installed without significantly changing the existing grades. Non-hazardous Hydrocarbon Impacted (NHIS) soil will be disposed of at an appropriate landfill. Since the remaining reservoir fill material is non-engineered and, at best, has poor bearing capacity, it will be necessary to support the cap with various soil and geosynthetic materials. A geotextile will be laid over the exposed work surface and anchored in a trench excavated around the perimeter of the work area. A tri-directional geogrid anchored in a 1-foot-thick gravel layer will be used to distribute loads as evenly as possible and to limit settlement to the cap center. A flexible membrane liner protected above and below by geotextiles will create the impermeable barrier. The primary function of the flexible membrane is to prevent downward migration of water, which may help to support wetland habitat in a manner similar to the current condition. The final component of the cap will be an overlying thickness of common fill and organic-rich topsoil, which will be contoured to mimic the existing topography and wetland hydrology. Remediation will unavoidably impact wetlands, which has also been identified as VPFS habitat, and rare plant communities. Details of wetland, VPFS habitat, and rare plant community impacts and their associated mitigation will be described in the Restoration Plan. Proposed ICs and ECs for Reservoir 3 are summarized in Table 1 and are designed to ensure that access to the site is limited and controlled. Long-term monitoring will include periodic inspections and maintenance as needed) to ensure that the institutional controls and cap remain effective. 3.4.3 AOC #3 - Pliable Surface Expressions of Petroleum AOC #3 includes approximately 3 acres of sticky hydrocarbon surface expressions in six general areas of the south Tank Farm (Figure 14). These surface expressions occur in topographically low areas that accumulated petroleum during the 1926 fire. These expressions are limited in areal extent by surrounding berms and are 2 to 3 feet thick on average. Because these expressions are in topographically low spots, many occur within waters/wetlands, some of which include VPFS habitat. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 23 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 The preferred remedy consists of excavating the plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions, disposing of the impacted material offsite, and restoring the original grade. This alternative would also restore (at a minimum) the existing waters/wetlands functions, establish ICs and ECs, and provide long-term monitoring. It is anticipated that the initial restoration of the impacted wetlands will occur at their current locations, but the final locations will be provided in the Restoration Plan. Wetland, habitat, and plant mitigation details will be described in the agency-approved Restoration Plan. Proposed ICs and ECs for AOC #3 are summarized in Table 1 and are designed to limit and control access. Long-term monitoring will include periodic inspections to ensure that those controls remain effective. 3.4.4 AOC #4 – Arsenic AOC #4 includes approximately 0.8 acre of arsenic-impacted shallow soil northeast of Reservoir 2 Figure 14). The impacted soil has been identified to be limited to the upper 2 feet of soil Appendix K). This area supports wetlands, VPFS habit, and rare plant communities. The preferred remedy consists of excavating the upper 1 to 3 feet of soil within the delineated area and restoring the original grade. The excavated arsenic-impacted material will either be used as backfill material within the Northwest Operations Area beneath the proposed cap or disposed of offsite. Restoration, creation, or reestablishment of waters/wetlands impacted by remedial actions will be described in the Restoration Plan. 3.5 OU #5- SITE-WIDE GROUNDWATER OU #5 includes site-wide groundwater, exclusive of the Northwest Operations Area. Groundwater flows toward the southwest at an average rate of about 100 feet per year. It travels primarily within sandy interbeds in the largely fine-grained valley fill. The major potential source areas for petroleum impacts to water quality in OU #5 are the LNAPL areas underlying the former reservoirs. Groundwater monitoring of OU#5 has been conducted continuously since 1990, both on and off the property, through a network of monitoring wells. The entire network is comprised of more than 80 monitoring wells. However, sufficient data has been collected during the 24-year program that the RWQCB has approved actively monitoring 29 of these wells. The 29 wells are located in key positions around the site that ensure any changes in the groundwater conditions could be rapidly addressed. Almost 1,000 groundwater samples were collected from the entire monitoring network from 1990 to 2007. For the most part, these samples were tested for TEPH and BTEX, although a significant number were also tested for PAHs. With respect to TPH, there is no maximum contaminant level MCL); the RWQCB regulates this contaminant on a case-by-case basis but often ascribes 1,000 micrograms per liter (µg/L) as a reasonable action level. A study of the OU #5 monitoring record indicates that 43 percent (414) of the samples tested for TEPH contained detectable (>100 µg/L) concentrations. These concentrations range from 100 to 1,600 µg/L, with a median concentration Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 24 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 of 220 µg/L. The vast majority of detected concentrations are in the 100 to 400 µg/L range, with many fewer in the 400 to 1,000 µg/L. Only 2 out of the 966 samples tested for TPH have contained concentrations greater than 1,000 µg/L, and neither of these was verified by resampling. Benzene has never been detected (<0.5 µg/L) in an OU #5 monitoring well. Therefore, in OU #5 there is no direct evidence of offsite migration of dissolved contaminants in excess of MCLs or the frequently applied RWQCB TPH action level of 1,000 µg/L. These findings, together with those of the groundwater natural attenuation monitoring program, suggest that any dissolved hydrocarbons generated in OU #5 are being attenuated by natural processes within distances of a few hundred feet from the source. As such, the preferred remedial alternative for OU #5 is monitored natural attenuation with ICs and long-term monitoring. Monitored natural attenuation includes semiannual sampling of the existing groundwater monitoring network on and surrounding OU #5, testing those samples for TEPH and natural attenuation parameters, and reporting these findings to the RWQCB in accordance with an approved monitoring and reporting program. Proposed ICs and ECs for OU #5 are summarized in Table 1. Land use restrictions may also be required on the Betita Property, situated south of the Tank Farm, due to the localized presence of petroleum in the subsurface (Figure 13). Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 25 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 4.0 GENERAL REMEDIAL ACTIONS Sections 4 through 7 provide detailed descriptions of the proposed remedial design. This section focuses on the general remedial actions. That is, those actions applicable across the site, irrespective of the operable unit. This includes long-term monitoring, excavation, and the general approach used in capping. Remedial actions implemented through this plan will be performed in accordance with the mitigation measures in the certified FEIR (Marine Research Specialists, December 2013) and other relevant regulations. The mitigation measures relevant to the remedial actions will be included as Conditions of Approval in the permits issued by jurisdictional agencies. A Conditional Use Permit with associated Conditions of Approval was issued by the County of San Luis Obispo Planning Commission on October 23, 2014. Another County agency, the SLOAPCD, will issue an Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate with Conditions of Approval. These conditions will include submittal of supplemental plans (Dust Control Plan, Hydrocarbon-Affected Soil Management Plan, Construction Activity Management Plan, Blasting Plan, Asbestos Dust Control Plan, etc.) with requirements guiding the conduct of work by the remedial contractor. Other agencies with permit authority for aspects of the project include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USFWS, National Marine Fisheries Service, and CDFW. 4.1 LONG-TERM MONITORING As described in the FS, remedial action includes various long-term monitoring activities. The principal monitoring activity is groundwater sampling and reporting. The requirements of the current program are described in Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) 93-120, which is provided in Appendix B along with supporting documentation describing its evolution over the last 15 years. The monitoring program currently requires sampling of onsite and offsite wells according to the list provided in Table 2. As part of the remedial activities at the site, the MRP will be updated to include monitoring of the integrity of the remedial caps, including the frequency of monitoring and specific activities involved during the monitoring events. Chevron currently samples all of the wells listed on a semiannual basis. Samples are tested for extractable range hydrocarbons, and samples from wells monitoring OU #1 are also tested for purgeable range hydrocarbons and BTEX. A few samples are analyzed for all three constituent types. Eleven monitoring wells, including 4 that are currently monitored (Table 2), are located in remediation areas and will need to be abandoned as part of the overall remediation activities Figure 20). Replacement of wells needed for post-remediation monitoring will be determined in consultation with the RWQCB. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 26 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Another consideration for future MRP revisions will be reductions in the monitoring frequency if post-remediation monitoring indicates that remedial objectives were achieved. Proposed post- remediation monitoring details are discussed more thoroughly in Sections 7.1.1 and 7.5. Long-term monitoring will also include periodic inspections of the caps and excavation areas to ensure those remedies continue to function properly and are achieving the remedial action objectives. Semiannual inspections are proposed, with one inspection event just prior to the rainy season and the other during or just after the rainy season. 4.2 REMOVAL EXCAVATIONS Some impacted near-surface soils, mostly those affected by petroleum with wildlife entrapment potential, will be removed. These removal areas have been chosen to either improve the function of a capping system or to mitigate an identified ecological risk. Where performed in conjunction with construction of a cap, the excavation will remove a limited amount of material defined by an excavation depth (e.g., 2 feet) or by exposure of some existing feature (e.g., a former reservoir bottom). Removal areas are described further in Sections 7.4.1 and 7.4.3, the North Marsh complex and Other Sticky Hydrocarbon Surface Expression areas of concern, respectively. The remediation by removal approach will be limited to pliable hydrocarbon material as originally identified in the FS. Field surveys will be conducted during construction activities to determine if new pliable hydrocarbon material has surfaced since the conclusion of the FS. Field determinations may also occasionally be required in consultation with the appropriate regulatory agencies to determine the need for removal of some hydrocarbon materials. Field determinations will be based on visual inspections for indications of recent hydrocarbon material flow or existing material expansion. Areas of expansion will be documented on field forms, and Global Positioning System (GPS) locations and photos will be recorded prior to removal and disposal of the material. Field investigations have shown that the isolated pockets of plastic hydrocarbon identified for removal are the byproducts of the 1926 fire or operational spills and appear to be localized to within 3 to 4 feet of the ground surface. In the event that these impacts are determined to extend locally to depths greater than 5 feet, it is proposed that removal excavations will be limited to a depth of 5 feet bgs. Four issues were evaluated in adapting this limitation: worker safety, the potential to encounter groundwater, mitigating risk to burrowing animals, and ensuring that plastic hydrocarbon does not resurface at some later date. Excavations beyond 5 feet require special planning and support for worker safety, based on the requirements of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA). In addition, excavations beyond 5 feet in the low-lying areas of the site are likely to encounter groundwater. The FS demonstrated that the risks of further environmental impact and the expense associated with the handling and treatment of impacted groundwater did not warrant the effort. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 27 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 One objective of the remedial design is to ensure that future open space uses of the site do not pose an unacceptable risk to potential ecological receptors, which includes burrowing animals. The proposed limit for excavation is below the burrowing depths of most animals that are likely to be encountered at the Tank Farm (California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 1998). Further protection may be provided by using a 0.75-inch gravel for the first 6 inches of backfill to act as a barrier to burrowing animals, if that is deemed necessary. Such measures will be provided in consultation with the CDFW. Based on previous expert experience, it is expected that 5 feet of compacted backfill will prevent resurfacing of the plastic materials. The materials are viscous and generally appear to mobilize only when exposed to the warming effects of direct sunlight (England Geosystem, Inc., 2000). By removing material from the near-surface and replacing it with a well-compacted backfill, the likelihood that the material will resurface is very low. Soil used for backfill will be compacted to 90 percent of its relative maximum density as determined by ASTM International (ASTM) Method D1557. Remediation will include long-term monitoring and maintenance of the site. In the unlikely event that plastic hydrocarbon were to resurface, it will be detected by the long-term monitoring program and further remedial steps, in coordination with appropriate agencies, would be taken as part of site maintenance. Excavated materials suitable for reuse (e.g., those not impacted by plastic hydrocarbon) will be segregated during excavation, stockpiled locally, and reused as common earth backfill. Common earth may include solid asphaltic (e.g., green-type) hydrocarbon. Materials that are impacted by plastic hydrocarbon will be disposed of offsite at an appropriate location. If feasible, impacted soils will be loaded directly onto a truck and hauled offsite. An alternative will be to temporarily stockpile the impacted material onsite. The Northwest Operations Area or another approved location will be used as a staging area, if needed, to stockpile contaminated soil prior to loading on trucks for offsite disposal (Figure 15). Based on known occurrences of plastic hydrocarbon material, it is estimated that remedial actions could generate approximately 157,000 cubic yards of impacted soil (Appendix F). An additional 39,000 cubic yards of impacted soil was included in the FEIR evaluation as contingency for the potential to find additional impacted soil during construction activities. If necessary, a secondary stockpile could be located on the south side of the Tank Farm in an approved location, most likely adjacent to the gate on the existing paved slab (Figure 15). This area is planned for storage of equipment and materials. Access routes to the proposed Northwest Operations Area stockpile location are shown in Figure 17. The routes have been chosen to use existing roads and thereby avoid sensitive habitat. These routes may require widening and drainage improvement, as discussed in Section 6.1. A temporary signal, flagman, or other means of traffic control will be provided, as necessary, at the Tank Farm Road crossing. In operating a stockpile for impacted soil, it will be necessary to comply with local air quality and traffic regulations. This will likely require covering the stockpile and periodic monitoring to keep Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 28 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 volatile organic compound emissions within regulatory limits. It will also be necessary to control dust and minimize stockpiling during the rainy season. It is anticipated that most hydrocarbon-impacted soils will be disposed of at the NHIS facility operated by the City of Santa Maria at their landfill. Chevron will provide representative sampling data for characterization purposes to the disposal facility to ensure that the impacted soils meet the acceptance criteria. 4.3 CAPS Caps will be used to separate impacted materials from potential human and ecological receptors. They will be constructed from earthen materials, but may also include various geosynthetic materials for additional strength or material separation. In addition, caps will support either open space or development land uses. A key distinction between the open space and development caps is that the former will be more varied due to differing design objectives and individual site constraints and will include a topsoil layer that will be used to support restoration. The development caps will be constructed of structural fill with a minimum thickness of 4 feet and will be managed to minimize soil erosion. To help protect against bioturbation, or excessive mixing of soils by burrowing animals or aggressive vegetation, monitoring of the caps will be conducted on a quarterly basis. Large burrows or tunnels that might allow water infiltration into the cap will be flagged and repaired. Each open space cap will include a gravel layer that is primarily intended to accommodate groundwater table fluctuations during the rainy season. The gravel will also provide a barrier to keep burrowing or tunneling animals from reaching the contamination beneath the cap. If excessive bioturbation continues to be a problem, adaptive management measures will be employed. These would be presented in the periodic monitoring reports in response to an identified problem. They might include measures such as sub-surface fencing, fumigation, and the use of rodenticides. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 29 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 5.0 EARTH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS There are four principal types of earth materials used for this project: common fill, structural fill, gravel, and topsoil. Specifications regarding composition, grain size, and other relevant parameters are provided in Appendix E. The following sections provide more detailed information regarding each of these principal soil materials. 5.1 COMMON FILL Common fill will be used for the majority of nonstructural and unspecialized fill needs for the project. It is readily generated from the available onsite soils. It may consist of silt, clay, silty sand, silty clay, clayey sand, or clayey silt. Common fill may have a wide gradation, as shown in Appendix E. One hundred percent of the material must pass a 1-inch screen, and up to 30 percent may pass the No. 200 sieve. The soil must not have any organic or otherwise decomposable or deleterious materials. Fill material generated from onsite borrow sources may contain small amounts of naturally occurring asbestos (Appendix P). If asbestos is detected in quantities greater than or equal to 0.25 percent, that material will be considered deleterious material and will not be used at the surface and will be restricted to use as fill material below an approved depth. Common fill will generally be placed in lifts between 8 and 12 inches in thickness and compacted to within 90 percent of its relative maximum density as measured by ASTM D1557. 5.2 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill is physically identical to common fill, but will be used in areas where greater soil strength is required, such as the caps that may support future development. The main difference between common fill and structural fill is that it must be placed in lifts with a maximum thickness of 8 inches and must be compacted to 95 percent of its relative maximum density per ASTM D1557. 5.3 GRAVEL Gravel will be primarily used during this remediation project in the caps that will be constructed over Reservoirs 5 and 7. The gravel will provide a structural void space that will provide a low- resistance accumulation space for rising groundwater and LNAPL. Gravel may also be used as a bio-barrier (if needed) in excavations or shallow caps to prevent burrowing animals from exposing or reaching contaminated materials. Material used for this function must be hard, durable, and not susceptible to slaking when immersed in water. An acceptable gradation envelope is provided in Appendix E. One hundred percent of the material must pass a 0.75-inch sieve and no less than 75 percent must be retained on a No. 4 sieve. Further, no more than 5 percent of the soil may pass a No. 200 sieve. The gravel may be placed in lifts of up to 12 inches in thickness and compacted with two passes of a 5,000-pound drum roller or similar piece of equipment. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 30 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 5.4 TOPSOIL Topsoil will be needed in restoration areas to revegetate the surfaces of caps and backfilled excavations. Topsoil layers will typically be 1-foot-thick organic-rich soils harvested onsite, amended, or imported to meet the specifications. Specifics of topsoil collection, handling, and storage will be discussed in the Restoration Plan. Topsoil can be any combination of silt-based or clay-based soil found onsite or locally. Onsite topsoil sources will be expected to contain at least 10 percent organic material. Onsite soils not meeting this requirement can be amended by the addition of fertilizers and mulch. Amended soils, however, must contain at least 15 percent organic matter. Topsoil will be placed in lifts no greater than 12 inches thick. It is anticipated that topsoil may be nominally compacted during placement, but will be scarified to a depth of at least 4 inches prior to seeding or planting. Additional soil requirements will be specified in the Restoration Plan if needed to achieve the performance measures required for each habitat area. The suitability of topsoil relative to site contaminants (e.g., TPH, arsenic) will be evaluated per soil sampling and testing protocols. The protocols will use site-specific risk-based screening levels and programs for sampling both in-situ and in stockpiles. The protocols will be included in the Soil Management Plan and submitted to the RWQCB for approval in consultation with San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Services. 5.5 EARTH MATERIAL SOURCES As many of the soil materials needed for remediation will be obtained onsite as feasible. The following sections discuss the various proposed borrow sources, the types of materials available in each, and the estimated quantity of potential borrow material. Figure 16 shows the location of each of the borrow sources, and Table 3 summarizes the estimated material quantities available from each. A discussion of proposed access routes is provided in Section 6.1. A quick comparison of Table 3 with the soil material needs of Table 4 shows that there is ample onsite soil for most of the project requirements. Numerous borrow sources are identified, to minimize the need to import soil, to allow flexibility, given the many construction constraints, and to maximize restoration opportunities. For instance, Borrow Sites No. 1 and No. 2 are located adjacent to large existing wetland complexes, providing an opportunity to expand those complexes. Some borrow materials, especially the tank berms, may contain asphaltic materials that are inseparably embedded into the soil matrix. SERRT determined that the asphaltic material does not warrant remediation and its use for common and structural fills is consistent with the findings and recommendations of the FS. Any plastic hydrocarbon encountered during borrow operations will be removed and disposed. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 31 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 It is estimated that 65,700 cubic yards of topsoil (Table 4) will be required for remedial construction. Any topsoil deficit will need to be closed by manufacturing topsoil from other borrow materials or importing topsoil from offsite sources. Use of the borrow sites may result in habitat impacts, which will be discussed in detail in the Restoration Plan. Final impacts will be determined during field activities and restoration of these areas will be further defined in the final Restoration Plan. 5.5.1 Flower Mound/OU #3 In order to provide onsite materials for remediation as well as to facilitate the City of San Luis Obispo’s proposed extension of Santa Fe Road, borrow activities at the Flower Mound/OU #3 Area will generate as much as 350,000 cubic yards of material, with approximately 40 percent that must be blasted and processed to use. A Blasting Plan will be prepared to guide the contractor in execution of the work. The Blasting Plan will include an asbestos dust mitigation plan and an air monitoring program plan to verify mitigation measures are being implemented properly and air quality is within acceptable limits. Pursuant to Airborne Toxic Control Measure Section 93105(g), an air monitoring plan for asbestos will be submitted to the SLO APCD for approval. Other supplemental plans will be submitted as required to execute this project. Approximately 73,700 cubic yards are located on adjacent properties, which will require access agreements with each property owner. For planning purposes, it is assumed that at least 26,300 cubic yards, and potentially all, of the offsite material may be available. Material produced from the Flower Mound will be crushed and screened to the material specifications included in Appendix E. It is anticipated that the Flower Mound material will be readily suitable for use as common, structural fill, or road base. However, preliminary testing Padre, 2007a) suggests that the Flower Mound material may not be sufficiently durable for use as gravel in the caps that will be constructed over Reservoirs 5 and 7 (Section 7.2). For the processing of the material from the Flower Mound potentially containing naturally occurring asbestos, Chevron will comply with District Rules and Regulations, and Air Toxic Control Measures 93105, Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, and 93106, Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Surfacing Applications. Chevron will work collaboratively with the SLOAPCD to develop a plan with sampling criteria and frequency to determine the asbestos content of any aggregate material to be used as surfacing material from the Flower Mound. The sampling criteria and frequency will be submitted with the Authority to Construct application for the project for review and approval by the SLOAPCD. 5.5.2 Berms It is proposed to use the berms adjacent to Reservoirs 5 and 7 to supply the common fill required for cap construction. If borrow from the berms is maximized, approximately 71,600 cubic yards will be generated; 38,800 cubic yards at the Reservoir 5 site, and another 32,800 cubic yards at Reservoir 7. Construction of both caps requires 37,000 cubic yards, which will result in Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 32 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 approximately 34,600 cubic yards of excess material that can be used for other onsite common or structural fill needs. 5.5.3 Borrow No. 1 Borrow No. 1 is an approximately 8.6-acre site located adjacent to the North Marsh (Figure 16). It includes approximately 2.3 acres that may have been used as a disposal area for demolition debris from the 1926 fire. Anecdotal reports suggest that the disposed materials consist mostly of construction debris, such as concrete and wood. It is estimated that the disposal area contains approximately 10,300 cubic yards, assuming an average depth of approximately 4 feet. As described in Section 7.4.1, this material will be characterized, removed, and managed at an appropriately permitted facility. After removal of the debris, it is anticipated that further excavation will be done to expand the wetland and borrow soil for onsite use. Soil suitable for use as common and structural fill, and possibly as topsoil, could be removed from the borrow area. The nominal grading contours for this area would begin at the existing floor of the wetland area and slope back to the east at approximately 0.5 percent. Side slopes would be no greater than 4:1 (horizontal:vertical). This grading approach would generate approximately 27,200 cubic yards of common or structural fill. It is estimated that approximately 9,000 cubic yards of topsoil may be recovered from this borrow area as well. Complete utilization of the borrow source and removal of the historical debris would potentially generate additional wetland habitat. Final activities in this area will be determined in consultation with resource agencies and will be addressed in the final Restoration Plan. 5.5.4 Borrow No. 2 Borrow No. 2 is located on the east portion of the site, south of Tank Farm Road (Figure 16). It covers approximately 17.73 acres. This location is anticipated to provide topsoil for revegetation purposes. It is estimated that at least 20,700 cubic yards of topsoil may be recovered from this location. It is assumed that the topsoil horizon is 2 feet thick, although the Geotechnical Report (Padre, 2007a) suggests that as much as 4 feet of suitable material may be available. After borrow operations are completed, the site will be regraded as shown in Figure 39. Excavation and restoration of Borrow No. 2 will temporarily or permanently impact existing waters/wetlands, VPFS habitat, and sensitive plant communities. Details of impacts to these ecological resources and their associated mitigation will be discussed in the Restoration Plan. 5.5.5 Borrow No. 3 Borrow No. 3 has a similar function to Borrow No. 1. It provides a useful source for common fill and structural fill, and possibly topsoil. It also provides an opportunity to expand the adjacent wetland, which will be discussed in the Restoration Plan. The proposed area is approximately 13.5 acres in extent (Figure 16). It is assumed that material will be borrowed from this source starting at the wetland along the south boundary. The existing Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 33 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 grade would be lowered to the elevation in the southwest corner and then allowed to slope up at approximately 0.5 percent to the north. This approach will yield approximately 50,650 cubic yards of total borrow (16,900 cubic yards of top soil and 33,750 cubic yards of common earth), and could generate new wetland habitat if fully utilized. Final ecological impacts will be determined during field activities, and restoration of these areas will be further defined in the final Restoration Plan. 5.5.6 Oxbow Borrow The oxbow borrow provides a source for common fill as well as rich topsoil that may be used for restoration throughout the site. This borrow area, similar to Borrow No. 3, provides an opportunity to expand the oxbow channel system to allow for the creation of additional wetlands and increase functionality of the existing system. The proposed borrow area is approximately 1.75 acres in extent. Borrow will be taken from this area to an average depth of approximately 10 feet to establish a functioning wetland within the confines of the oxbow and will be discussed in the Restoration Plan. This approach will generate approximately 25,500 cubic yards of common earth and 2,800 cubic yards of topsoil material. Final restoration of this area will be further discussed in the Restoration Plan. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 34 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 6.0 SITE-WIDE REMEDIAL ACTIONS There are several construction-related remedial actions that are not considered specific to a particular OU. Those actions are discussed in this section and include mobilization and staging of equipment and materials, demolition of the existing buildings, miscellaneous cleanup activities, and abandonment of the remaining pipelines. 6.1 MOBILIZATION, STAGING AREAS, AND SITE ACCESS Mobilization is the stage of construction when the contractor prepares the site to begin work. This includes a variety of tasks including moving equipment and support trailers onsite, improving site access, installing storm water and dust control Best Management Practices (BMPs), and natural resource protection measures. To successfully accomplish this work, the contractor will require ready access to the work areas with logical and ample traffic routes. At the same time, the contractor must also minimize impacts to non-work areas and avoid sensitive habitat areas that must be preserved. Figure 17 shows the anticipated work areas and the proposed staging areas and access routes. Within the scope of the activities described in this Revised RAP, the contractor will limit his activities to the areas identified in Figure 17. In the event unforeseen site conditions require access to the off-limit areas, access shall be coordinated on an as-needed basis with the appropriate regulatory authorities. The work areas are the limits within which remediation activities will be conducted for a given operable unit or area of concern. The work area limit is generally defined by the extent to which a particular site must be cleared and grubbed to properly perform the work and provide the contractor with sufficient room to move equipment and materials. The limits shown in Figure 17 are, however, only approximate. More precise delineations of the work areas are provided in the drawings found in Appendix C, and these areas will continue to be refined as the project progresses. The contractor will use the former recycling area as his primary staging area. It is paved, readily supplied with electrical power and telephone service, and is centrally located on the property with reasonably convenient access across Tank Farm Road. Major maintenance (e.g., engine rebuilds, fluid changes, fueling) may be performed at the primary staging area in specially prepared areas with proper spill control measures in place. Other local staging areas are also shown in Figure 17. These are located directly adjacent to the work areas and would be used to stage materials, park equipment, and other support activities. Vehicles and equipment can be fueled and minor maintenance (e.g., changing tires) may be performed at the local staging areas. Water is available onsite for construction purposes. Water wells are located just north of the Northwest Operations Area, at the southwest corner of the site (south of Tank Farm Road), at the southernmost tip of the site (also south of Tank Farm Road), and on the eastern edge of the site south of Tank Farm Road (Figure 17). The contractor will supply pumps (as necessary), storage Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 35 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 tanks, and stands to fill water trucks. One storage tank and fill stand is expected be in the primary staging area (Figure 17), and another will likely be located south of Tank Farm Road, adjacent to the entrance. The final locations will be determined by the contractor to best facilitate his work, consistent with the work area constraints show in Figure 17. The contractor is responsible for determining the adequacy of water supply and for making any upgrades to the supply infrastructure. Prior to mobilization, the suitability of the existing water distribution network for conveying water for construction purposes will be evaluated. If feasible, fill stations would be located at readily accessible points such as the fire hydrants. Otherwise fill stations will be supplied by temporary overland pipelines. At this time, it is expected that the southernmost well will be the primary source of construction water at the site and that aboveground irrigation-grade piping will be used for water conveyance to aboveground water holding tanks supplied with J- stands. Bottled water will be used for potable purposes and will be brought onsite and stationed at work and staging areas as needed. The contractor will also supply sanitary facilities at needed locations. The principal construction entrance to the site is anticipated to be located as shown in Figure 17. This location utilizes the existing entrance to the site south of Tank Farm Road, but is also reasonably close to the Primary Staging Area. It also consolidates access to the site at one point along Tank Farm Road. A traffic study (Associated Transportation Engineer, 2007) recommended a standard intersection with left-hand turn pockets and right-hand deceleration lanes at the site entrance. The intersection should also include signalization to control traffic during the construction period. A preliminary traffic control plan is shown in Figure 18. The plan will be finalized with the SLO County Public Works Department. The conceptual plan moves the entrance gate back approximately 100 feet from the road. Berms will also be removed to provide deceleration lanes and to ensure adequate site distance. The greater distance from the road will allow trucks to park at the gate without blocking traffic along Tank Farm Road. Other access points will be provided as needed but controlled by the contractor. Access to the site will also be maintained at the Northwest Operations Area, but will not be used as a primary access to the site. The internal routes shown in Figure 17 are intended to provide the contractor with access to all potential work and borrow areas across the site with as little impact to sensitive habitat as possible. The access routes utilize existing dirt tracks. Those shown as solid lines in Figure 17 will be required, while those shown as dashes will only be used if the borrow sources shown at the end of those routes are developed. It is anticipated that most routes must be able to accommodate two- way traffic. Existing dirt tracks will be widened, as necessary, to at least 24 feet in the direction that is least likely to affect adjoining sensitive areas and habitats. Management procedures will be used to minimize impacts from dust and erosion. Where necessary, the contractor will improve the roadway by grooming the subgrade to provide a reasonably smooth and regular surface. In areas potentially subject to inundation or rutting a geotextile will be placed over the subgrade and will be used to provide separation between the subgrade and a 6-inch-thick (minimum) course of compacted crushed miscellaneous base or gravel. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 36 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 The contractor will also provide traffic control to ensure the safe operation of vehicles and equipment. One key component will be controlling traffic crossing Tank Farm Road. It is anticipated that a temporary traffic signal will be used, but at a minimum the contractor will provide a flagman and signs. The contractor may suggest alternative access points onto and across the Tank Farm. Any alternative routes must be approved by the Construction Manager and the appropriate regulatory agencies prior to use. Access to the borrow areas will be provided on an as-needed basis. As noted previously, some of the borrow sources may be used to facilitate other project needs such as mitigating impacts to natural resources. The use of these locations, and the associated access routes, will be determined at a later date. 6.2 BUILDING DEMOLITION There are four buildings at the Tank Farm (Figure 3), located in the Northwest Operations Area, that will be demolished during remediation. Three of these buildings were constructed to support historical operations at the site. Two of these buildings have undergone asbestos and lead paint abatement and are no longer used, and the third is used primarily as office space. The fourth, a modular building installed adjacent to the northernmost original building, was constructed within the last five years to provide additional office space. Chevron personnel and operations will be removed from the site in conjunction with remediation; however, it is possible that building demolition could precede implementation of the final RAP. Before, or as the buildings are demolished, recyclable or potentially reusable materials will be removed. It is anticipated that the buildings will be demolished using excavators. Some of the buildings have metal structural elements or siding, which will be segregated for recycling as feasible. Other materials will be loaded into haul trucks for disposal. Concrete foundations will be broken apart using a hydraulic hammer and removed. It is possible that concrete will be crushed and used as gravel elsewhere on the site. Utility lines will be disconnected and abandoned. Where lines are aboveground, they will be removed. Where utility service is brought to a building underground, the line will be cut at a point at least 2 feet below grade and capped. Service lines that use pipes or conduits greater than 4I inches in diameter (e.g., water, sewer) will be filled with cement grout. Voids created in the existing grade by demolition will be backfilled with structural fill or gravel. 6.3 MISCELLANEOUS CLEANUP There are four locations onsite that have been identified as requiring cleanup or demolition that are not part of one of the operable units or areas of concern. They are not generally “contaminated” or impacted areas, although they may have some impacted soil associated with them. Rather, they are comprised of debris or abandoned structures that are unsightly or possible physical hazards. These are shown in Figure 19. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 37 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Three of the locations are found on the parcel north of Tank Farm Road. There are two debris piles along the north property line. They appear to contain mostly concrete debris. As with other concrete debris, the contractor may crush this material and reuse it for gravel elsewhere on the site. Otherwise, the concrete shall be hauled offsite for recycling or disposal. The other area identified on the parcel north of Tank Farm Road is the historical debris disposal area adjacent to the North Wetland. As discussed in Section 5.5.3, the material in this area will be excavated and removed for disposal or recycling as appropriate. It is recommended that the limits and characteristics of the waste be defined prior to excavation and disposal. Material removed from the excavation will be segregated on the basis of how it will be managed. Concrete may be recycled, as described previously. Other construction debris will be sent to a solid waste landfill for disposal. Impacted soils will be removed, characterized, and managed at an appropriately permitted facility. It is anticipated that the excavation will not be backfilled to expand the wetland area. The fourth miscellaneous cleanup location is found south of Tank Farm Road, adjacent to Reservoir 6 Figure 19). It is a concrete vault approximately 5 feet wide, 12 feet long, and 8 feet deep. The crude oil supply line serving Reservoirs 6 and 7 connected to it, but it is not known if it was a separator, a valve box, or served some other purpose. The vault is open and presents a physical hazard to people and animals and a possible entrapment hazard to small animals. The steel hand rail will be removed and the upper 3 feet of the concrete wall will be broken and used to fill the bottom of the vault. A sand-cement slurry will be used to fill the void spaces. The remaining depth of the vault will be backfilled with common fill until the original grade is reestablished. 6.4 PIPELINE REMOVAL AND ABANDONMENT When operational, the Tank Farm required numerous pipelines to move oil between the pump house, boilers, tanks, and reservoirs. The site was also served by water, natural gas, and septic lines. Figure 5 shows pipeline locations based on historical facility drawings. It is estimated that more than 25,000 feet of oil pipeline were installed onsite; approximately 4,500 feet are found in the Northwest Operations Area (Figure 6). Much of that pipeline remains in place, as indicated in Figures 5 and 6. Appendix L provides an analysis supporting assumptions, lengths of each type of pipeline, and volume of liquids in each type of pipeline. Chevron intends to remove and dispose of most of the pipeline located within work areas or found aboveground. Figure L-2 shows the extent of pipelines within the work areas. By abandoning in place the pipelines that are outside of the work areas, the overall project disturbance is minimized. In addition, many of these areas are sensitive habitats (e.g., the rings of the former aboveground Abandoned concrete vault adjacent to Reservoir 6-to be abandoned Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 38 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 storage tanks) that do not require any other remediation. In-place abandonment in these areas preserves existing habitat. Finally, any of the pipelines are subject to abandonment in place if removal were to create unsafe work conditions. All pipelines will be flushed and, if possible, pigged to remove residual hydrocarbon and vapors prior to abandonment. If a section of pipeline is in such poor condition that it cannot be adequately cleaned, it will be excavated and removed in its entirety. These procedures of pipeline draining and decommissioning will be modified based upon field conditions or improved methods. A site-wide oil spill contingency plan will be prepared and implemented for the remediation activities to outline response procedures for releases that may occur during this or other operations as recommended by CDFW in its comments on the Draft Final RAP emailed on September 22, 2014 to the RWQCB staff, see Appendix N). 6.4.1 Pipeline Inventory The positions of the pipelines shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 have not been field verified. While these figures (and the similar engineering drawings found in Appendix C) are reasonable approximations of their locations, final remediation will require more accurate information. It is expected that prior to abandonment, a detailed field survey will be performed to locate the lines and characterize their contents. Potholes will be dug at key locations (e.g., ends, transitions, junctions, valves) to expose the pipe and determine its diameter and materials of construction. Line tracing will be performed using an appropriate geophysical instrument operated by a trained technician. The alignment of the pipeline will be flagged every 5 feet. Pothole and flag locations will be recorded using a high-precision GPS unit and entered into a Geographic Information System (GIS ) database. A detailed pipeline inventory, noting location, depth, size, materials of construction, and condition, will be created to guide abandonment activities. Given the interconnected, and possibly deteriorated, web of pipelines within the Northwest Operations Area, Chevron may elect to cut the lines at the operable unit boundary and completely remove them from its interior. In this case, the lines will be removed in accordance with Section 6.4.4 after their positions have been confirmed. 6.4.2 Pipeline Flushing and Pigging Water trucks attached to portable pumps would be connected via hose to each petroleum pipeline segment within the facility. Additionally, several portable storage tanks or vacuum trucks would be stationed and attached to the pipelines to receive and collect the flush water. Each pipeline segment will be flushed with an adequate volume of water to remove residual oil from the pipelines. Pipeline flushing operations will continue until no sheen is observed in the flush water. The pipeline segments that may be suitable for pigging will be identified by Chevron during the initial potholing activities or other field activities. The pigging operations will be basically the same for each pigging run segment. The maintenance tool or pipeline pig is introduced into the line via a pig trap, which includes a launcher and receiver. Without interrupting flow, the pig is then forced through the pipe by fluid flow, or it can be towed by another device or cable. Usually Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 39 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 cylindrical or spherical, pigs sweep the line by scraping the sides of the pipeline and pushing debris ahead. Each segment will have a beginning location where the pig is “launched,” and an end section where the pig is “received.” The pigging operation procedures are presented below. First, the launching/receiving locations will be prepared for the procedure. Buried ends of the pipeline will be excavated. The excavations will vary depending on the depth of the pipe, but should not typically exceed an area larger than 7 feet wide by 12 feet long (84 square feet) and no more than 5 feet in depth. A trench box may be used to minimize the area affected by the excavation. The pipeline fluids will be drained from the pipe and the pipe will then be cold-cut to gain access to the pipe. The pig launcher/receiver will then be attached to the exposed pipe ends. Once the pig launcher and receiver are attached to the pipeline, the subject pipe segment will be pigged. The pigging operation will involve the use of scraper-type or foam pigs. The scraper pig is constructed to help remove any remaining hydrocarbons from the inside walls of the pipeline as it moves down the pipe. The pigs will be pushed through the piping segment using liquefied nitrogen gas or compressed air. At the receiving end, vacuum trucks will be used to remove any liquids from the pipe as the liquids are pushed ahead of the pigs. Carbon filtration canisters will treat any vapor emissions generated during pipeline purging operations, in accordance with San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD) requirements. Chevron will obtain approval from SLOAPCD for the proposed activities. Recovered hydrocarbons and water from the pigging operation will be properly disposed of or recycled at an appropriately permitted facility. There is the possibility that a pig may become lodged in the pipe by an obstruction. If the pig becomes obstructed along a pipe segment, the field crews will identify these locations. Excavation activities may be required to remove the pig and the damaged/obstructed section of pipe. 6.4.3 Pipeline Grouting Pipelines that are scheduled for abandonment in place with diameters greater than 4 inches will be grouted with a cement-slurry to prevent any future ground subsidence from pipe wall collapse. Site conditions may make grouting some pipe either impractical or undesirable. If accessing the pipe would create unsafe work conditions, increase site disturbance, impact sensitive habitat, or the pipe has deteriorated such that the grout would leak, the pipe will be abandoned in place without grouting. A portable grout pump will be used to pump grout into the pipeline segments. Following grouting, the pipeline segment ends will be backfilled with soil and the soil compacted. 6.4.4 Pipeline Segment Removal Chevron proposes to remove piping that is located within remediation work areas or is aboveground and readily accessible. If practical, the pipeline segments will be flushed or pigged prior to removal. The pipeline segment endpoints will be isolated and cut. The pipeline segment will then be uncovered by excavating a trench to the existing pipeline depth. As the pipeline is Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 40 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 removed from the trench, a spill containment device will be placed under the pipeline end to catch any residual fluids in the containment. All liquids drained from the piping into the containment device will be removed using a vacuum truck and hauled to an approved facility for disposal or recycling. The pipe segments will then be cut into manageable pieces, the pipe ends wrapped in plastic to prevent spillage, the segments removed from the trench, and the trench backfilled. Scrap pipe will be temporarily stored in bins and transported offsite for recycling. 6.5 MONITORING WELL DESTRUCTION Remediation will require the destruction of 25 monitoring wells across the site. These wells are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 20. Each of the affected monitoring wells is in an area that will be excavated or over which a cap will be constructed. Post-remediation replacement monitoring wells will be determined in consultation with the RWQCB and incorporated into the MRP. Well abandonment will be performed in accordance with California Department of Water Resources Bulletin No. 74-81 and the applicable requirements of the San Luis Obispo County Department of Environmental Health. Permits for this activity will be obtained from the San Luis Obispo County Department of Environmental Health. Monitoring well monuments will be removed and disposed of offsite. The wells will be drilled out using an auger slightly larger than the original boring. Most of the wells consist of 4-inch casing in an 8-inch boring. In this case, a 10-inch-diameter auger would be used to drill out the well. Cuttings will be stored in drums and disposed of offsite. The boring will be backfilled with hydrated bentonite. The boring will be checked 24 hours after the initial abandonment. Additional hydrated bentonite will be added if settlement of the initial fill is observed. A completion report for the abandonment of monitoring wells will be submitted to the SLO County Department of Environmental Health as required by the destruction permits and to the RWQCB in the MRP. 6.6 HISTORICAL WATER WELLS Review of historical operational records and facility drawings has identified the approximate locations of three historical water wells. These approximate locations, which have not been verified, are shown in Figure 19. Inspection of these areas has not revealed any surface features associated with the wells. It is likely that the wells were abandoned many years ago and any other record of them has long since been lost. Chevron proposes to conduct a thorough field investigation to verify the location and condition of the wells in an attempt to determine if the wells were properly abandoned. It is probable that the wells were constructed with steel casings, and if they are still present, they could possibly be detected by a magnetometer. A licensed geophysical contractor will sweep the approximate well sites and will map and stake any magnetic detections. A backhoe will be used to expose the detections and identify them. If the wells are located, the method of abandonment will be investigated. If the method does not meet modern standards, a Well Destruction Plan will be Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 41 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 prepared and submitted to RWQCB for approval. Upon approval, permits will be obtained from the SLO County Department of Public Health and the well will be abandoned according to the requirements of California Department of Water Resources Bulletin 74-81. 6.7 RESERVOIR 2 BERM REMOVAL Reservoir 2 currently consists of a 600-foot-diameter circular berm approximately 15 feet in height and is a significant feature within the runway protection zone (RPZ) (Figure 9). The SLO County Airport Land Use Commission has identified this condition as a safety concern relative to obstructions and limited access in the event an aircraft were to make an emergency landing within the RPZ. In conjunction with the site-wide remedial activities, the wall will be demolished and the containment berm will be graded to present a generally smoother topography. The conceptual approach and anticipated impacts are presented in Appendix D. As shown in Figure 14, this area also contains shallow surface soil impacted by arsenic. The remedial action for this AOC will involve excavating the upper 1 to 3 feet of soil within the delineated area and restoring the original grade with clean backfill material. The excavated arsenic-impacted material will either be used as backfill material within the Northwest Operations Area beneath the proposed cap or disposed of offsite. 6.8 LAND USE COVENANTS Land use covenants will be provided as needed for the final parcels. This will include not only potentially developable parcels, but also the open space areas. A land use covenant is a legal document that will accompany a parcel’s deed. It will be signed by representatives of Chevron and the lead agencies (e.g., RWQCB, County of San Luis Obispo, City of San Luis Obispo), and will be notarized and recorded with the County Clerk/Recorder. It is intended to ensure that future owners of the properties understand what mechanisms are in place at the site to protect human health and the environment, and to identify for future property owners their responsibilities in maintaining those protections. The specifics of the land use covenants for the Tank Farm will vary depending on which parcel is under consideration. It will, however, identify the allowed land uses and will exclude uses that might be allowed under current or future land use planning but are inappropriate for the site. The land use covenants will list the various caps and other containment features that must be maintained. It will be accompanied by various documents, such as the guidelines for vapor barriers Appendix M) and the final Restoration Plan. The land use covenant will also restrict the use of groundwater in areas of impacted soil on the Tank Farm property. Chevron will work with adjacent land owners to establish covenants regarding soil and groundwater on adjacent properties affected by historical site activities. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 42 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Draft land use covenants (as required) will be prepared by Chevron for review by the RWQCB and the lead municipality after the RAP has been approved and final covenants will be recorded prior to any land transfers. 6.9 VAPOR BARRIERS The FS identified the need for vapor intrusion mitigation as an engineering control in habitable structures built in some of the development areas. Decomposition of the underlying hydrocarbons generates methane and possibly hydrogen sulfide. In addition, benzene in the southern portion of the Northwest Operations Area currently (i.e., pre-remediation) poses a potential risk to human health. The RAP specifies that development areas will be capped to provide separation between the underlying constituents and potential receptors. It is possible that capping alone may mitigate vapor intrusion by preventing vapors from reaching the surface and accumulating within future inhabited buildings. However, the conditions after capping or other remediation actions are complete will be evaluated to determine if vapor intrusion has been mitigated or if additional engineering controls need to be established. As discussed in Section 1.4, upon completion of remedial actions, Chevron will prepare a Certification Report documenting that the remedial action objectives of this plan were met and submit it to the RWQCB for concurrence. At least one year prior to submittal of any Certification Report(s) by Chevron, a vapor intrusion mitigation program will be developed and submitted to the RWQCB and San Luis Obispo County Environmental Health Services for review and approval. The program will include soil gas sampling protocols and a methodology for data evaluation to determine if engineering controls (which may include further vapor intrusion mitigation) are or are not needed. If feasible, the protocol will be applied to each individual parcel. For any parcels where it is determined that engineering controls are needed, a land use covenant will be established for the parcel(s) as part of the final Certification Report documents. The examples provided in Appendix M are illustrations of typical, commonly used approaches for construction of vapor intrusion mitigation systems. These approaches have been used on other projects subject to methane and/or volatile organic compound intrusion, and have been approved by numerous regulatory agencies and municipalities. All applicable land use covenants will refer to the approaches included in Appendix M. In addition, these covenants will require that future developers adhere to the most current vapor intrusion mitigation guidance that exists at the time development occurs. Because such guidance is not a substitute for actual construction documents, however, it is expected that future developers will use appropriate guidance in preparation of development plans and specifications that will ultimately be subject to approval by permitting agencies with appropriate jurisdiction. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 43 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 7.0 OPERABLE UNIT REMEDIAL ACTIONS This section presents the remedial actions specific to each operable unit. It provides detailed descriptions of how the remedial actions will be implemented, as well as the engineering and regulatory bases behind their design. This section includes numerous figures meant to illustrate the remedial actions, and while they are based on the engineering drawings found in Appendix C, they should still be considered only diagrams. 7.1 OU #1 - NW OPERATIONS AREA As described in Section 3.0, OU#1 (the Northwest Operations Area) consists of two media-based areas of concern. The first, AOC #1, is groundwater, and the second, AOC #2, is soil. The preferred remedy for AOC #1 is monitored natural attenuation with long-term monitoring and institutional controls. The preferred remedy for AOC #2 is construction of a soil cap, with a minimum thickness of 4 feet, long-term monitoring, and institutional controls to manage soil that may be exposed during development or maintenance of the site. 7.1.1 AOC #1 - Groundwater Monitored natural attenuation will be implemented using the same parameters and methods as specified in Monitoring and Reporting Program 93-120 (Appendix B). However, remediation will require abandonment of several monitoring wells (Table 2). Post-remediation monitoring wells will be determined in consultation with the RWQCB, which will also approve future revisions to the MRP. At a minimum, it is anticipated that initial post-remediation monitoring requirements will include sampling and analyzing groundwater for TPH and BTEX (consistent with MRP 93-120) at the remaining perimeter monitoring wells MW-49, MW-50, MW-56, and SLOW-17, and the offsite production wells 11Ea and 11Eb. Currently, monitoring is performed on a semiannual basis. After three years, the RWQCB will evaluate the semiannual groundwater data to determine if a reduction in the monitoring frequency is warranted. A land use covenant will be prepared for the operable unit that includes restrictions on the use of groundwater. Those restrictions will prohibit installation of groundwater wells within or immediately downgradient of petroleum-impacted soils. 7.1.2 AOC #2 - Soil-Development Scenario It has been presumed in this plan that AOC #2 will be developed at some point in the future and will not be considered suitable habitat for flora or fauna. As such, the remedial objectives are to prevent human contact with the arsenic, TPH, and PAHs that are found in the shallow soil in this area. Construction of a 4-foot-thick soil cap was selected as the preferred remedial alternative in that it not only satisfied the remedial objective, but also made future development feasible by raising the grade out of the 100-year flood plain. The 4-foot-thick soil cap will also be protective of ecological resources until such time as development occurs. The remedial action for this AOC also includes the removal of the upper 2 feet of soil (an estimated total of 675 cubic yards) impacted by arsenic, which will be consolidated under the cap. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 44 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Prior to building the cap, the site must be prepared for construction. Figure 21 illustrates the demolition plan and subgrade preparation proposed for AOC #2. It is assumed that prior to demolition, surveys of the currently occupied buildings have been completed for lead- and asbestos-containing materials, the pipelines within AOC #2 have been either abandoned in place or have been removed as described in Sections 6.2 and 6.4, respectively, and the monitoring wells within the AOC will have been abandoned per Section 6.5. After surveys and abatement have been completed, the buildings will be demolished. Demolition will also include removal of the existing fences and gates along the south and west boundaries of AOC #2. Future development of the region around the San Luis Obispo Airport envisions widening Tank Farm Road to a 100-foot-wide (or greater) right-of-way (City of San Luis Obispo, 2005). This will necessitate moving the southern boundary of the Northwest Operations Area north approximately 30 feet or more (Figure 21). To ensure that the historical infrastructure does not interfere with future road widening, Chevron will remove any existing features from this area, including pipelines and concrete foundations, within the future right-of-way. Prior to any significant demolition work, the site must be cleared and grubbed within the limits shown in Figure 21 and more thoroughly defined on the construction drawings provided in Appendix C. Clearing and grubbing will consist of removing all vegetation from the site. Brush and small trees will be cleared by cutting them down and pulling up the roots. The site will be grubbed to a depth of at least 3 inches using a tractor or small dozer to remove grasses and other low-lying vegetation. Northwest Operations Area along Tank Farm Road - looking west Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 45 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 There are two underground pipelines along the west boundary of the Northwest Operations Area. One is a 2-inch-diameter natural gas line and the other is a 4-inch-diameter water supply line. The gas line is fed by the 4-inch-diameter gas main located in Tank Farm Road and owned by Southern California Gas Company. The water line is fed by the existing water well located adjacent to the southwest-most former tank ring, but is also connected to other water lines across the property. A series of timber poles support both electrical and telecommunication lines. Along that western boundary are drops to electrical panels that feed service to the buildings. Chevron will remove the utilities along this property line prior to constructing the cap. The gas line will be cut and capped at the 4-inch main under Tank Farm Road. It will be necessary to coordinate this work with The Gas Company. Similarly, the aerial utilities will be disconnected at Tank Farm Road in coordination with AT&T and PG&E. Underground electrical and telecommunication conduits supplying service to the demolished buildings will also be removed. Excavations to remove buried conduits and pipelines will be backfilled with structural fill. It is likely that Chevron will retain the existing water well located adjacent to the southwest-most former tank ring (Figure 21). The well is also shown in the digital image below. Electrical service will be provided to the well via an underground conduit after construction of the cap. The location and specifications for the conduit are provided in the design drawings found in Appendix C. The conduit will be made of 4-inch-diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and will be buried at a depth of 5 feet, in accordance with applicable local rules and regulations for providing electrical service. Northwest Operations Area along west property boundary – looking north. Northwest Operations Area - existing water well Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 46 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Two septic tanks with leach fields manage wastewater at the Northwest Operations Area. One tank serves the southern building and the other serves the northern building, as shown in Figure 21. The tanks and leach lines will be abandoned in place in accordance with the standards of San Luis Obispo County (2006). This will require emptying the tank contents with a vacuum truck, supplying a receipt of the work to the County Inspector, and then filling the tank with a cement slurry or concrete. There are six overhead light standards located around the paved portion of AOC #2. These will be removed and recycled or disposed of as appropriate. Concrete foundations for the lights will be broken apart to a depth of at least 2 feet bgs. The resulting hole will be backfilled with structural fill. Conduits providing electrical power to the lights will be cut at least 2 feet below the existing grade and capped. Conductors will be pulled and recycled. A 10,000-gallon polyethylene water tank stores water for firefighting at AOC #2. Once the buildings are demolished, the tank will no longer be needed and will be removed from the site. Water is supplied to the tank by the 2-inch-diameter water line that enters near the top of the tank. The larger 4-inch-diameter line connects to a booster pump and then to the water distribution system that feeds various hydrants surrounding the site. Water level in the tank is maintained by electronic sensors that ensure that a minimum depth of water is present at all times. The tank sits on a 4-inch-thick cast-in-place concrete slab and is protected by four bollards. Once the tank has been removed, the bollards will be pulled and the holes backfilled with a cement slurry or concrete. The concrete slab will be broken apart and recycled onsite along with other concrete debris for use as gravel. Water lines and conduits will be cut 2 feet below the existing grade, capped, and any excavations backfilled with structural fill. Electrical conductors will be removed from the conduit and recycled. As can be seen from the above images and as indicated on Figure 21, AOC #2 is partially paved. The pavement will be left in place. Any valve boxes or other similar types of subterranean vaults not otherwise removed during demolition activities will be filled with cement slurry. Detachable parking curbs will be removed for recycling, and asphalt edge curbs will removed. Northwest Operations Area - fire water tank Northwest Operations Area - typical light standard Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 47 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 The former fire school used a concrete-and-asphalt- lined pit for teaching and training techniques for extinguishing petroleum-fed fires (Figure 21). The remains of the pit are shown in the adjacent image. It may be difficult to place and compact structural fill within the pit, which might result in unwanted differential settlement. It is, therefore, proposed to remove the loose debris in the bottom of the trench until a firm surface has been exposed. The trench will then be backfilled with cement slurry to the existing grade. The loose material will be drummed, profiled, and managed at an appropriately permitted facility. Figure 21 shows that AOC #2 has concrete vestiges of the historical petroleum operations. Some of these foundations are flush with the ground surface, or nearly so, and can be abandoned in place, such as the one shown in the image below. Other concrete structures that project more than 6 inches above the ground surface will protrude above the subgrade preparation layer described below and will interfere with construction of the cap. Consequently, the contractor may leave in place any concrete structure that projects above the existing ground surface less than 6 inches. Concrete structures that project more than that distance must be removed. The concrete may be broken up and recycled onsite for use as gravel. The contractor may elect to remove the low-lying concrete structures, as well, if that proves more economic for gravel production. Voids produced during removal of the concrete structures will be replaced by structural fill to the existing ground surface. Once the work area has been cleared and grubbed and the demolition and abandonment activities have been completed, the subgrade will be prepared. This will include compacting the existing ground surface to the specifications of structural fill. In addition, a 6-inch- thick layer of backfill will be placed over the entire work area and compacted to the specifications of structural fill. The intent of this effort is to provide a uniform surface over which to place the geotextile fabric described later in this section. A 12-ounce geotextile will be used to identify the contact between the cap and former ground surface. It is intended to warn future construction workers that the underlying soil layers are potentially contaminated. Specific warnings and instructions will be provided in the land use covenants. Along the sloped soil boundaries, an anchor trench will be cut beneath the location of the slope break, which is the point on the cap surface where the grade switches from a gentle slope to a steeper slope that eventually meets the existing grade. The anchor trench will be at least 1 foot Northwest Operations Area - burn trench used by former fire school Northwest Operations Area - typical concrete slab requiring removal Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 48 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 wide and 3 feet deep, and will be backfilled with structural fill. These end details are illustrated in Figure 26. The cap itself covers approximately 6.4 acres and will be constructed of structural fill. To promote proper drainage across the site, the cap thickness varies from a minimum of 4 feet to a maximum of approximately 7 feet towards the center. It is estimated that 53,400 cubic yards of structural fill will be necessary to achieve the lines and grades depicted in Figure 22. It is anticipated that this material will be obtained from the Flower Mound borrow source (Figure 16) by crushing run-of- pit material to meet the specifications for common earth provided in Appendix E. The proposed cap is thicker, on average, than the nominal thickness specified in the FS to provide adequate flexibility for future development layouts. The proposed grading allows for surface runoff. The Geotechnical Report identified potentially soft soils typically between 6 and 25 feet bgs, although the depth varies, beneath the Northwest Operations Area. The settlement analysis Appendix H) estimates that settlement due to the load of the cap could be on the order of 4 to 6 inches. The Geotechnical Report estimated that additional settlement due to foundation loads could be on the order of 1 to 2 inches. In general, it is not considered practical to remove the soil for recompaction. Groundwater is relatively shallow (on the order of 10 to 15 feet bgs ). As was discussed in Section 7.1.1, groundwater in this area is affected by LNAPL, benzene, as well as TPH in the soil. The site would require significant dewatering, with treatment of the resulting effluent, and disposal of contaminated soils. To address settlement concerns outlined in the Geotechnical Report, some recompaction of the soils beneath the pipelines will occur as they are removed. To the degree possible during remediation, soils will be stockpiled over the Northwest Operations Area to promote settlement. This has the effect of surcharging the existing soils to provide for further compaction. During construction of the cap, the Northwest Operations Area may also be used as a location for temporary construction activities or stockpiling of material from the Flower Mound or other borrow sites to further surcharge and provide compaction for the cap. Construction of the cap will include installation of three survey monuments at the locations shown in Figure 22 to facilitate settlement monitoring of the cap. An illustration of a typical survey monument is shown in Figure 27. Should low spots develop following construction, they would be repaired as part of the long-term maintenance program until the property is sold. Future building foundations will require consideration of the soil conditions that will be included in the covenants. Use restrictions will require that specific and detailed geotechnical studies be prepared for any work subsequent to cap construction, that geogrid reinforcement or piles be considered for foundation designs, and that any work below the bottom of the cap be in accordance with an agency-approved plan to manage potentially impacted soil. Storm water management features for this cap are designed to handle a 100-year recurrence storm. Runoff is handled as sheet flow off the cap surface. It is directed from a high point near the mid- Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 49 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 point of the site to ditches along the perimeter. It is carried in ditches to hardened drop points at the locations shown in Figure 22. Drop structures have rip-rap reinforced energy dissipaters to prevent erosion. The calculations used to size the storm water management features are found in Appendix G. Runon occurs at two locations and is diverted away from the cap at each. Currently, storm water drains from the north toward where the cap will be constructed. Although the amount of flow is relatively small, it is undesirable to allow this water to pond at the cap toe. Consequently, a flow line will be established along the toe of slope that drains toward the existing ditches and wetlands to the east. Ditches along the toe of slope are hardened with gravel and cobbles to minimize erosion at the transition between the slope and the existing wetlands. The other principal source of runon is from the west, along Tank Farm Road. A local high point is located on Tank Farm Road approximately 1,000 feet west of the Tank Farm. Surface runoff from the surrounding properties is directed toward the Tank Farm in the swale that runs on the north side of the road. At present, the runoff drains onto the agricultural property adjacent to the Tank Farm. During heavy precipitation, the attenuation capacity of that land is exhausted and water drains onto the Northwest Operations Area as sheet-flow. Runon then flows across the property, collecting in numerous local low points (including the southernmost building) until reaching the wetland complex. The cap will cut off this route for storm water flow, and as such, a new drainage ditch is proposed at the toe of the southern graded slope. The flow line of the new ditch will start at the existing grade at the western edge of the property and drop to the floor of the wetland complex to the east and will be sized to accommodate up to 17.2 cubic feet per second of flow (Appendix G). Rip-rap will provide erosion protection at the entrance to the wetland complex. The alignment and slope of the ditch are illustrated in Figure 22, and a typical cross section is shown in Figure 23. In addition to the erosion control measures previously described, additional BMPs will be provided to minimize the potential for erosion from the cap to the wetland as detailed in a regulatory- approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. Unmitigated, soil erosion could be as much as 0.2 ton per year (Appendix J). It is anticipated that the recommended BMPs outlined in the SWPPP will substantially lower this total. The ditches along the top of slope of the cap will be provided with sandbag chevrons to slow water flow and allow sediment to drop out of suspension. During construction, soil cement may be used to help stabilize exposed slopes from erosion. Further, the surface and slopes of the cap upon completion will be covered with a spray-applied mulch/seed, which will be maintained until the property is developed. As discussed in Section 2.2, this portion of the site is within the 100-year flood plain of Tank Farm Creek. Construction of the pad will locally remove approximately 12.4 acre-feet of flood storage capacity. It is estimated, however, that further downstream (south of Tank Farm Road) there is an additional 27.9 acre-feet of available storage capacity. Further, restoration of the North Marsh will include expanding the existing wetland complex to provide addition flood storage capacity. This is further discussed in the Hydrology Study (Avocet, January 26, 2009). Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 50 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 As described in Sections 6.8 and 6.9, institutional controls will be adopted to protect the integrity of the cap. The land use covenant will strictly define appropriate uses for the property. Excavation depths will be controlled, and excavations deeper than the bottom of the cap will be conducted under the requirements of the Soil Mitigation Plan. Prior to development of the site, access will be controlled through fences and gates. Additional fences will be installed around the interior boundary of the operable unit with a locking gate, as shown in Figure 22, to control access between the development area and the adjacent open space. Prior to development, the cap will be periodically inspected and maintained, as necessary. Proposed ICs and ECs are summarized in Table 1. 7.2 OU #2 - RESERVOIRS 5 AND 7 The primary remedial action objective for Reservoirs 5 and 7 (i.e., OU #2) is to prevent the emergence of liquid hydrocarbon on the open water that accumulates at these locations. The sheen produced by the liquid hydrocarbon may adversely affect ecological receptors such as water fowl. The FS determined that the most feasible way to prevent contact is to cap the reservoirs in a manner that allows groundwater (and the overlying hydrocarbon) to fluctuate naturally and not try to find alternative (i.e., lower resistance) flow paths. Prior to constructing the cap, it will be necessary to clear the work area. The demolition plans for Reservoirs 5 and 7 are illustrated in Figure 28 and Figure 29, respectively. The detailed engineering drawings for demolition are included in Appendix C. A proposed work area boundary has been established for each reservoir. This boundary establishes where the contractor may operate his equipment, disturb habitat, and where cleanup and construction will take place. The contractor will identify the work boundary in the field and provide protective measures to prevent impacts outside of the boundary. These will include cones, caution tape, temporary fencing (if appropriate), silt fences, and other dust and erosion control BMPs. One of the first demolition tasks will be the removal of the protective enclosures, an example of which is shown in the adjacent image. These enclosures were installed to ensure that small animals, such as birds, are not entrapped in sticky plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions. They occur both inside and outside of the reservoir berms. Every location with a protective enclosure is presumed to overlie a surface expression of plastic hydrocarbon that requires removal. Those within the limits of the former reservoir berm are addressed as part of the cap construction. Outside of the berm limits soil beneath the protective enclosures will be removed as described in Section 4.2. Note that there are some plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions outside of the Reservoir 5 work area (Figure 28). Excavation and impacted soil removal at this location is addressed in Section 7.4.3. The enclosure materials will be removed from the site by the contractor and recycled (if feasible) or disposed of in a solid waste landfill. Reservoir 5 - typical protective enclosures Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 51 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 The protective enclosures will be removed immediately prior to construction activities within each respective area so as to minimize exposure of surface expressions to wildlife to the extent practical. Other site preparation activities will include the removal of any pipeline remnants in the work area. The old 8- inch-diameter crude oil distribution line is nearly tangent to the southwest edge of the Reservoir 5 berm. A lateral from this line appears to branch into Reservoir 5. The remains of the lateral can be seen ending within the reservoir in the above image. The remains of the 12-inch and 8-inch lines that served Reservoir 7 may also still be present underground. The concrete superstructure that supported those lines is still visible in the reservoir (see adjacent image). It is expected that the 4-inch-diameter fire water line shown surrounding Reservoir 5 (Figure 5) is still present. Since Reservoir 7 was abandoned after the 1926 fire, an upgraded fire water line was never installed at that location. If a pipeline is exposed or is encountered in grubbing, scarifying, or obtaining borrow soil, it will be removed and disposed of as described in Section 6.4.4. Those portions of existing lines that lie outside of the work area will be cut, flushed, pigged (if possible), and capped as described in Section 6.4.2. There is a lot of concrete and concrete debris within the work boundary of each reservoir. This includes old pump and lightning tower foundations, valve boxes, vaults, and other supports that were used during historical operations. There are also several small piles of broken concrete on the floor of Reservoir 5 (Figure 28). It also includes the concrete walls of the reservoirs that were cast on the berm slopes. The approximate extent of the walls for Reservoirs 5 and 7 is illustrated in Figure 28 and Figure 29, respectively. Although there appears to be little of the original walls left in Reservoir 5, much of the original walls remain in Reservoir 7 (see adjacent photograph). Concrete debris will be removed from the work area. If practical, it will be recycled to create crushed gravel for use on this project. Otherwise, it will be hauled offsite for recycling. Concrete that is too impacted by petroleum for reuse will be hauled away for disposal at an appropriate facility. Two monitoring wells in OU #2, both located within Reservoir 5 (see Figure 28), will be destroyed. The monitoring wells are within the proposed cap boundaries. The procedures described in Section 6.5 will be used to abandon the monitoring wells. Reservoir 5 – former oil pipeline Reservoir 7 – overview of existing bottom and concrete-lined slopes Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 52 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 It will also be necessary to remove the seepage study equipment that was installed to determine the process by which sheen formed on the open water of the reservoirs and which contributed to the design of the caps proposed in this RAP. The structures were constructed by excavating holes into the reservoir bottoms and installing large-diameter corrugated metal pipes on end. The annular space between the corrugated metal pipes and the soil was sealed with grout. The interiors were partially filled with clean sand and were instrumented to monitor water levels. Observations of water and LNAPL levels within the structures and the surrounding monitoring wells provided our current understanding on sheen formation. Any remaining instrumentation will be removed from the structures and returned to Chevron for final disposition. Any remaining PVC sounding tubes will be pulled from the ground and disposed. The corrugated metal pipes will then be pulled from the ground using a backhoe or similar large piece of equipment. Any resulting void space will be filled during placement of the gravel layer, as described below. Other debris, concrete, or metal that is discovered within the work area will also be removed. This will include the metal posts that are encountered at various locations, wire, fire hydrants, and other debris. Metal and concrete will be recycled where practical. Other materials will be disposed of as appropriate to their characteristics. The last step prior to constructing the cap will be to expose the original concrete floor of the reservoirs. As can be seen in the adjacent image, there is a variable thickness of accumulated soil and organic matter. It is estimated that Reservoir 5 will generate 15,300 cubic yards and Reservoir 7 a further 11,000 cubic yards, for a total of 26,300 cubic yards. This will be stripped and disposed of at an appropriately permitted facility. Equipment used to strip this material will be properly decontaminated to remove any accumulated oily soil before being used to move clean soil elsewhere onsite. Material removed as part of the decontamination process will be disposed of along with the stripped reservoir material. Implementation of this part of the remediation will be most successful if accomplished in the summer, fall, and possibly early winter if there is little precipitation that year. Remediation may be postponed during periods of high groundwater levels and water in storage in the reservoirs. Once construction has begun, it should be finished as quickly as possible to prevent having to manage petroleum-impacted water. The proposed grading plans for Reservoirs 5 and 7 are illustrated in Figure 30 and Figure 31, respectively. A diagram of the cap profile is shown in Figure 32. The engineering drawings Appendix C) include the detailed designs for the caps. Reservoir 7 – accumulated debris in reservoir bottom Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 53 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Once the floor has been exposed, the reservoir bottom can be backfilled with gravel. As described in Section 5.3, this material will be selected and placed so that it provides a low-resistance pathway for groundwater and LNAPL to move into during their seasonal fluctuations. Consequently, it is desirable to have a relatively uniform material with little to no fine material (i.e., particle size less than No. 200 sieve). This will create large void spaces with little resistance to flow and a low likelihood of future clogging. The gravel will be placed in lifts no greater than 12 inches thick and will be nominally compacted by one pass of a steel drum roller. Placement of the gravel will be controlled by the nominal top-of-layer elevation. These elevations, 119.20 feet above mean sea level (amsl) for Reservoir 5 and 123.50 feet amsl for Reservoir 7, are based on the relative differences between the known concrete floor elevations and the highest observed local groundwater elevation plus a 1.5-foot factor-of-safety. The top of the gravel is above the downgradient ground surface of the reservoirs. Water cannot rise above this elevation within the reservoir without daylighting outside the reservoir, thereby controlling water levels within the reservoirs. The floor elevation of Reservoir 5 is 115.50 feet amsl, and the highest measured groundwater elevation between 1999 and 2002 was 117.70 feet amsl. Similarly, the floor elevation of Reservoir 7 is known to be 116.50 feet amsl, and the highest recorded groundwater elevation was 122.00 feet amsl. The top of the gravel layer can be no less than the specified design elevations, and results in a minimum thickness of 3.7 and 7 feet for Reservoirs 5 and 7, respectively. It will be acceptable for the contractor to allow the gravel layer to be thicker, but the final surface cannot have depressions or low spots that dip below the nominal top-of-layer elevations. As shown in Table 4, it is estimated that 20,100 cubic yards of gravel will be needed to fill Reservoir 5, and another 39,000 cubic yards will be needed for Reservoir 7. A 12-ounce 4 geotextile will be placed over the gravel to prevent migration of fine soil particles into the void spaces from the overlying soil layers. The geotextile will be anchored in a trench dug around the original concrete floor. The trench will be dug into a shelf cut into the existing berm. The shelf will be approximately 3 feet wide. It is anticipated that the trench will be dug by a small pocket-size excavator with an arm that can be offset from the machine’s centerline. The trench will be centered in the shelf and will be approximately 1 foot wide and 3 feet deep. The configuration of the shelf and anchor trench is illustrated in Figure 33. The trench locations for Reservoirs 5 and 7 are shown in Figure 30 and Figure 31, respectively. The geotextile will be placed as required by the manufacturer. This will include trimming the edges that go into the anchor trench and sewing adjacent rolls together at their overlapped edges. Pro-forma calculations have been included in Appendix I that demonstrate the selected geotextile will prevent soil migration, has adequate tensile strength, and that the anchor trench is sized appropriately to prevent pull-out. 4 Geotextile is typically identified by its weight per square yard. Therefore, an 8-ounce fabric weighs 8 ounces per square yard. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 54 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 The final grades shown in Figure 30 and Figure 31 will be achieved by placing common fill with a 1-foot surface veneer of topsoil over the geotextile. The objective with these grading plans is to produce as natural-looking of a landform as possible. The final grade will be nominally controlled by grading from a control contour established near the top of the cap. The surface will slope at no more than 4:1 (horizontal:vertical). Ditches will be established around the perimeter of the cap to ensure proper runoff of storm water. The final configuration of the slopes and ditches will be developed in the field to best integrate with the surrounding topography within the other parameters of the design. It is estimated that Reservoir 5 will require 12,500 cubic yards of common fill and 12,600 cubic yards of topsoil. As shown in Figure 30, the berm borrow around Reservoir 5 could generate another 26,300 cubic yards of common earth that could be used for fill around the site. This material will only be removed if needed elsewhere onsite. Reservoir 7 is expected to require 24,500 cubic yards of common earth and 11,000 cubic yards of topsoil for cap construction. An additional 8,300 cubic yards of soil are potentially available from the local berm borrow if needed elsewhere onsite. The slopes and ditches are designed to minimize potential erosion. The ditch slopes will vary between 0.5 and 2 percent and are designed to accommodate the 100-year return period storm. The discharge points of each ditch are provided with some type of energy dissipation. Where velocities are less than 2 feet per second, a simple gravel mat is supplied. If the exit velocities are greater than 2 feet per second, a reinforced rip-rap energy dissipater will be installed. The hydrology and hydraulic calculations supporting the ditch dimensions and energy dissipaters are found in Appendix G. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service recommends limiting soil erosion to less than 2 tons per acre per year. The calculations in Appendix J show that the estimated annual soil loss from the caps is 0.53 ton per acre and 0.77 ton per acre for Reservoirs 5 and 7, respectively. The surfaces of the Reservoir 5 and 7 caps will be revegetated with an approved native plant seed mix as determined in the Restoration Plan. The surface of the cap will be scarified to a depth of at least 3 inches. Prior to the onset of the rainy season, and preferably as close as possible to the season’s first rain, the seed mix will be applied. The caps will be protected after application of the seed with jute net or spray-applied mulch that will minimize erosion until the vegetation can take root. As noted previously, remediation of the Tank Farm results in unavoidable impacts to existing wetlands, some of which include desirable VPFS habitat. The demolition plans depict the wetlands on and around Reservoirs 5 and 7. Impacted wetlands are shown in blue, while wetlands not affected by construction are shown in green. Some of the wetland impacts will be temporary and the existing wetlands will be reestablished after remediation is complete. Those impacts that are permanent will be mitigated onsite. A summary of estimated habitat impacts will be provided in the Restoration Plan. Settlement is not anticipated to be a significant issue for the Reservoirs 5 and 7 caps. The caps will be constructed over the original concrete floors, which will tend to evenly distribute the Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 55 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 overlying soil loads. The cap is further reinforced by the geotextile, which, within limits, will also distribute loads and provide a bridging support over localized weak spots. In addition, it is likely that the soils directly beneath the reservoir are overconsolidated; that is, they have experienced greater bearing stress than they currently experience. The reservoirs were loaded with a 20-foot or more thickness of oil for many decades. That historical load will have worked to compress the soils, and it is expected that additional settlement should be minimal. To ensure proper performance of the caps, future settlement will be monitored in conjunction with the MRP. Three monuments will be placed on and around the cap, as shown on the grading plans for each of the caps. The monuments will be of a standard design acceptable to the City or County. Typically, a survey monument will consist of a 5/8-inch-diameter steel or aluminum rod between 3 and 5 feet in length. The rod is driven into the ground and then topped with a domed cap that threads onto the rod. One monument will be located on the top of the cap, another near the edge, and a third at a location adjacent to the cap on native ground. Monitoring of the cap will be as described in Section 9.0 7.3 OU #3 - RESERVOIR 4 OU #3 is located on the eastern side of the Tank Farm north of Tank Farm Road (Figure 14). As noted in the FS, this area includes the remains of Reservoir 4, and has several plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions that pose potential entrapment hazards. Chevron has elected to implement a closure approach for this OU that supports future development in accordance with the proposed land use plan (Figure 10). This entails excavation of the surface expressions and construction of a cap over the former reservoir. The work area boundaries for OU #3 are shown in Figure 34. Site disturbance associated with remediation of OU #3 will be confined to this area. Preparation of the site for remediation will include clearing, grubbing, removal of the protective enclosures and monitoring wells, and demolition and removal of concrete debris and pipeline remnants. Protective enclosures will remain in place for as long as practical to minimize exposure of wildlife to the existing surface expressions. A demolition plan for the Reservoir 4 area is shown in Figure 35. Clearing and grubbing will remove vegetation from the work area. Grubbed vegetation will be managed as allowed by San Luis Obispo County, the RWQCB, and the SLOAPCD. A chain link fence secures the property along Tank Farm Road and along the eastern property line. A barbed-wire fence separates the Reservoir 4 area from other portions of the site. The barbed- wire fences are used by ranchers to create paddocks suitable for cattle grazing. The chain link fence will be maintained, except that minor modifications will be made in its alignment to maximize the working area. The barbed-wire fence will be removed. One monitoring well (TMW-9) will be abandoned within OU #3. This well is included on the list in Table 2. The wells will be abandoned as described in Section 6.5. Two monitoring wells along the southern boundary of OU #3, MW-17 and MW-18, may need to be either modified or removed and replaced following completion of grading activities. Replacement of wells needed for post- remediation monitoring will be determined in consultation with the RWQCB. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 56 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 There are four protective enclosures clustered adjacent to the northwest boundary of Reservoir 4. These will be removed and recycled or disposed of as appropriate. It is presumed that plastic surface expressions are beneath each of these enclosures. The underlying soil will be excavated in accordance with Section 4.2 and the more specific descriptions found later in this section. Protective enclosures will remain in place for as long as practical to minimize exposure of wildlife to the existing surface expressions. Concrete foundations for the lightning towers and pumps are still found surrounding the reservoir (Figure 35). These will be removed from the work area and crushed for use as gravel elsewhere on the site, or will be sent offsite for recycling. In addition, frames constructed of wood and concrete (believed to be test plots from a previous study) are found on the west side of the reservoir. These will be removed for disposal at a permitted facility. The remains of the foundations for the reservoir roof and interior wall can be seen in the field and are shown in Figure 35. The contractor can abandon these foundations in place if approved by the Geotechnical Engineer and they do not interfere with achieving the lines and grades shown in Figure 38. The contractor will also have the option of recovering the foundations to create gravel for use elsewhere onsite if feasible. Crude oil and water lines historically served Reservoir 4 Figure 5). It appears that most of the crude oil line has been removed (see adjacent image), or is possibly buried within the reservoir. There are exposed portions of the water line, but it is believed to be substantially intact due to the hydrants that still surround the reservoir (Figure 35). The remains of the crude oil line will be exposed and removed to a point outside of the work area. Some of the water line is exposed at the surface; other portions are within the area that will be used as common earth borrow for the cap construction. As such, the water line will be cut at the three locations where it appears to enter the work area. Those portions within the work area will be removed, while those sections outside of the work area will be capped and managed as described in Section 6.4. Figure 37 shows the areas where soil has been impacted by plastic hydrocarbon. This area is approximately 8.35 acres and is estimated to contain as much as 40,400 cubic yards of impacted soil. The contractor will segregate plastic-hydrocarbon-impacted soil from asphaltic material and clean soil during the excavation. Those nonimpacted materials can be incorporated into the structural fill for the cap. Excavation will be performed as described in Section 4.2. The remaining Reservoir 4 – abandoned oil pipeline Abandoned concrete lightening stand foundation Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 57 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 subgrade will be compacted to at least 95 percent of its relative maximum density per ASTM D1557. Geotextile will be used to identify the cap bottom and to provide some structural support in the event of differential settlement. The potential for settlement is discussed later in this section. Approximately 342,900 square feet of geotextile will be anchored in a trench positioned around the former reservoir as shown in Figure 37. The trench will be 1 foot wide and 3 feet deep. Calculations estimating the resistance to pull-out for this trench (including potential strain induced by differential settlement) are provided in Appendix I. The proposed grading plan for the Reservoir 4 cap and the Flower Mound is shown in Figure 38. The grading plan ensures a minimum of 4 feet of cover over the former reservoir bottom. The maximum thickness is approximately 11 feet, and the average thickness is just over 6 feet. On the east side of the grading area, approximately 900 feet north of Tank Farm Road, is a small drainage basin that collects runoff from the entire grading area. It is estimated that this grading plan will require approximately 262,800 cubic yards of structural fill. The Flower Mound borrow area is expected to generate at least 328,200 cubic yards, and up to 402,000 cubic yards if Chevron has access to the offsite material, so there is adequate fill material in the vicinity. Some of the excess may be used to regrade Borrow Area No. 2. After topsoil removal, structural fill will be placed as shown in Figure 39. Enhancement of existing drainages and the construction of new channels and detention features are required to adequately manage storm water. The features shown in this RAP are conceptual and intended to be temporary, although they may be used for several years. Final BMPs will be coordinated with the restoration efforts and shown in the construction plans and SWPPP, which will be submitted to the RWQCB for review in conjunction with permit processing. Supporting hydrology and hydraulics calculations for the overland system are provided in Appendix G. The hydrologic design point for the area north of Tank Farm Road is identified on Figure 38. Overall, the peak flow to this point has been reduced, mostly due to the longer travel path that water must flow over, which results in a longer time of concentration. The existing peak flow at this point during the 100-year storm is estimated to be 67 cubic feet per second. The peak flow for the same storm after grading is estimated to be approximately 51 cubic feet per second. Most of the graded areas will drain by sheet flow to the rough graded interior roads. These roads collect storm water and direct it to large, oversized, constructed swales along Tank Farm Road and the north property boundary. The larger swale along Tank Farm Road discharges to an even larger swale along the toe of the collector road slope. That swale and the swale along the northern property line discharge to a small sediment removal basin just before the design point (Figure 38). The swales are broad and will be roughened and vegetated to reduce flow velocities, minimize erosion, and limit sediment transport. Regrading of Borrow Area No. 2 will alter the hydrology. At present, precipitation is trapped in a closed catchment. Rough grading of the City of San Luis Obispo’s proposed Santa Fe Road Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 58 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 extension will permit 2.9 acres to discharge directly to the East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. The peak flow of this discharge during the 100-year storm is estimated to be 5.1 cubic feet per second. This is a relatively minor contribution to the overall flow of the creek, and is unavoidable if Santa Fe Road is to be extended as described in the AASP (City of San Luis Obispo, 2005). In addition to the erosion control measures previously described, additional BMPs will be provided to minimize the potential for erosion from the cap to the wetlands. Unmitigated, soil erosion could be as much as 1.38 tons per acre per year (Appendix J). It is anticipated that the BMP regime will substantially lower this total. Possible BMPs include, but are not limited to, silt fences, sand bags, and fiber rolls. Final BMPs will be coordinated with the restoration efforts and shown in the construction plans and SWPPP, which will be submitted to the RWQCB for review in conjunction with permit processing. Remediation activities in OU #3 and the Flower Mound will affect wetlands, VPFS habitat, and rare plant communities. A summary of impacts to wetlands, VPFS habitat, and rare plant communities and corresponding mitigation will be provided in the Restoration Plan. It was noted previously in this section that there is a potential for settlement to occur. It is believed that decommissioning of Reservoir 4 included pushing berm material over the concrete floor. Field inspections of this material indicate that it has not been compacted. The Geotechnical Report Padre, 2007a) estimated that settlement may be on the order of 3 to 4 inches. During construction, the upper few feet of existing material will be compacted. It is not intended, however, to expose and recompact petroleum impacted soils. The cap thickness of 11 feet is expected to address settlement and support issues. In addition, a 12-ounce geotextile will be used to provide additional tensile strength and load distribution capacity. With respect to future building foundations, developers will be required to comply with land use restrictions contained within the land use covenants. Covenants will require that specific and detailed geotechnical studies be prepared for any work subsequent to cap construction, that geogrid reinforcement or piles be considered for foundation designs, and that any work below the bottom of the cap be in accordance with an approved plan to manage potentially impacted soil. Potential settlement of the cap will be monitored through the use of survey monuments. It is proposed that five monuments be installed in and around this operable unit. Their locations are shown in Figure 38. A typical survey monument detail is shown in Figure 27. The survey monument consists of a 5/8-inch-diameter steel or aluminum rod driven to a depth of between 4 to 6 feet bgs. The rod is topped with a threaded cap mounted flush with the ground that identifies the monument. The monuments will be periodically surveyed as part of the long-term maintenance requirements for the site. In addition to possible high-load foundation requirements, the land use covenant will specify the various ICs and ECs that will accompany title to the property. Proposed ICs and ECs are summarized in Table 1. These will include limitations on excavation, impacted soil management Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 59 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 requirements, and general guidelines on the use of vapor barriers for habitable structures. An example of these guidelines is provided in Appendix M. 7.4 OU #4 - REMAINING SITE-WIDE TERRESTRIAL AND WETLAND AREAS The remaining site-wide impacted terrestrial and wetland areas are addressed as OU #4. It includes three areas of concern. The first, AOC #1, is the North Marsh adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area. The second, AOC #2, is Reservoir 3, and AOC #3 is the remaining plastic (“sticky”) hydrocarbon surface expressions. 7.4.1 AOC #1 - North Marsh The North Marsh is a large (approximately 11.9-acre) wetland complex adjacent to the Northwest Operations Area. The SERRT identified this area as requiring remediation as a result of the numerous surface expressions that posed potential entrapment hazards to small animals. After careful consideration, Chevron determined, and documented in the FS, that the preferred approach to remediation would be to excavate the hydrocarbon material and restore the wetland in place with improved function and environmental utility. The anticipated work area for OU #4/AOC #1 is defined by the clear and grub line shown in Figure 41. Every attempt will be made to minimize working outside of the excavation limits. However, it is also recognized that the excavation areas may expand in order to fully capture the hydrocarbon materials within the wetland. The contractor will, to the extent possible, stockpile and protect cleared wetland vegetation. Greater detail regarding selecting, segregating, stockpiling, and maintaining vegetation will be provided in the final Restoration Plan. One possible stockpile location is shown adjacent to the North Marsh in Figure 41. Other locations can be used, as necessary, as long as they minimize impacts to existing and otherwise unaffected habitat. There are three protective enclosures within the work area. These will be dismantled and removed for disposal or recycling, as appropriate. Since they are each within the wetland, the presumption that they enclose plastic hydrocarbons is addressed by the excavation described later in this section. Protective enclosures will remain in place for as long as practical to minimize exposure of wildlife to the existing surface expressions. As discussed in Section 5.5.4, the facility used a location adjacent to the wetland for debris disposal following the 1926 fire (Figure 41). This material will be removed. It may be recycled into gravel for use elsewhere on the site (if feasible), or it may be removed from the site for recycling. There are two monitoring wells in the work area that will be abandoned, B-36 and SP-4. They are more fully described in Table 2 and their locations are shown in Figure 41. The wells will be abandoned as described in Section 6.5. There are three other monitoring wells (B-33, B-35, and MW-16) that are immediately adjacent to the work area. These will be protected in place if possible. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 60 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 PG&E and AT&T have utilities (power and telecommunications, respectively) that cross the work area adjacent to Tank Farm Road (Figure 41). The contractor will be responsible for protecting those utilities in place or relocating as needed. Several of the old facility pipelines intrude into the excavation area, as shown in Figure 41. The historical records indicate that there are a water line and two Foamite lines in the north part of the excavation limits crossing in an east-west direction (approximately 400 lineal feet each in the work area, approximately 1,200 lineal feet total). These lines appear to have been used for fire suppression purposes at the 55,000-barrel ASTs. There are two former crude oil lines that cross the excavation area in an east-west direction almost at the midpoint (approximately 860 lineal feet each in the work area, 1,720 feet total). A water line and natural gas line (the latter is reported to have been abandoned) run parallel to Tank Farm Road in the unpaved shoulder area approximately 270 lineal feet each in the work area). Another water line is found at the southwest end of the excavation area crossing in a north-south direction. A stub off that line protrudes into the excavation area approximately 60 feet in an easterly direction. It is likely that pipeline abandonment will occur prior to remediation in the North Marsh. As such, the lines will have been cleaned, as needed. If the lines are not exposed during excavation, they will be abandoned in place as described in Section 6.4. If the lines are exposed during excavation of the North Marsh, they will be removed for disposal. The lines will be cut approximately 10 feet outside the work area. The exposed pipeline end will be capped and the local excavation will be backfilled with common fill. A preliminary excavation boundary is shown in Figure 41. It is believed that this boundary includes all of the hydrocarbon expressions that affect the North Marsh. The boundary is delineated in this way mostly for permitting purposes so that the potential maximum impact is quantified in the environmental analysis. The entire excavation boundary, as shown in Figure 41, covers over 13 acres. The FS estimated the average thickness of impacted soil to be 3.5 feet. Excavating to this depth within the boundary would generate 75,300 cubic yards of soil, most of which will require offsite management. The mapped hydrocarbon surface expressions, in contrast, are only 7 acres (including the protective enclosures). Excavation limited to this area would result in a correspondingly lower volume (approximately 40,000 cubic yards). The actual volume is anticipated to be somewhere between these extremes, but the larger quantity will be used for planning purposes. Excavation is expected to proceed from the north to the south. This allows haul trucks to most readily access either Tank Farm Road for offsite disposal or the temporary impacted soil stockpile in the Northwest Operations Area. The potential haul routes are shown in Figure 17. The access point from Tank Farm Road shown on the figure is preferred since the RAP envisions some form of active traffic control at this location while work is in progress. Although remediation of the North Marsh will create the single largest waters/wetlands impact for the entire Tank Farm project, it does not affect any VPFS habitat, and the impacts are only temporary. In fact, remediation is expected to increase the size of the habitat when the historical Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 61 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 debris disposal area is cleaned up. Impacts to waters/wetlands and rare plant communities and specifics for restoration of the North Marsh will be discussed in the Restoration Plan. 7.4.2 AOC #2 - Reservoir 3 Reservoir 3 was one of the largest reservoirs and one of the last to be decommissioned. Although it contains a large wetland complex, it is unlike Reservoirs 5 and 7 in that the wetland is not of the open water type. Rather, it is generally a wet-marsh-type, with areas of plastic hydrocarbon exposed at the surface where it poses a physical, and possibly chemical, hazard to ecological receptors. Further, the wetland does not appear to be fed by groundwater, again distinctly different from the wetlands in Reservoirs 5 and 7. The preferred remedial alternative for this area of concern is to remove a limited amount of impacted material and replace it with the cap components, which will include geosynthetics that will create an impermeable barrier and help to support the overlying cap materials. This is anticipated to allow replacement, and possibly expansion, of the existing wetlands. The work area for Reservoir 3 is shown in Figure 42. This work boundary includes the adjacent wetland complex to the northwest that is impacted by plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions. Preparation of this work area will include clearing, grubbing, removal of concrete debris for recycling or disposal, dismantling and removal of the protective enclosures, and removal of exposed pipelines. Protective enclosures will remain in place for as long as practical to minimize exposure of wildlife to the existing surface expressions. There appears to be less concrete debris surrounding this reservoir than the others across the Tank Farm. There are a couple of lightning tower stands and some other loose concrete debris that will be removed for recycling. The remains of the original concrete that lined the reservoir berm slopes can also be observed at the ground surface see adjacent image). Those portions that are within the excavation limits (Figure 42) will be removed for recycling as well, assuming that they are not heavily stained with hydrocarbon. Heavily stained concrete will be removed for disposal at an appropriately permitted facility. Reservoir 3 – former concrete wall foundation Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 62 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Reservoir 3 also contains the single largest protective enclosure on the Tank Farm. This enclosure and the one just outside the berm to the north of the reservoir will be dismantled and removed from the work area. If practical, the materials will be salvaged or recycled. If this proves impractical, the contractor will dispose of the materials at an appropriately permitted facility. A single abandoned pipeline approaches the reservoir from the north (Figure 42). It is uncertain if the line even continues into the reservoir. The line will be flushed, pigged (if practical), and abandoned in place (as described in Section 6.4), assuming that it does not interfere with excavation or construction of the cap. If this assumption proves incorrect, the pipeline will be cut outside the work area, capped, and the portion inside the work area will be removed for disposal. The water supply line that served Reservoir 3 appears to be well out of the proposed work area and is not expected to affect the work in this area of concern. It does appear, however, that the water line crosses several of the other plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions adjacent to the reservoir. Managing the water line at these locations is described in Section 7.4.3, below. The preferred remedy developed in the FS recommended removing approximately 2 feet of existing material and replacing it with the components of the cap. Nominally, this would be effective in that the work area is essentially flat, though slightly higher in the center and the east. The resulting depression supports the wetland habitat in this area. The refined approach in this RAP is to remove the minimum 2 feet of material at the outer edge of the excavation, but to deepen the excavation in the center of the reservoir so that the excavated bottom has a 0.5 percent slope toward the interior. It is anticipated that this excavation will generate approximately 26,700 cubic yards of hydrocarbon-impacted soil that will require removal and disposal. The excavation will start at elevation 134, which is also the elevation that the top of the cap ties into the existing ground along the outer edge of the reservoir. The entire surface of the cap will then be approximately the same elevation as the existing wetland complex, which should allow restoration and expansion of the existing habitat. The subgrade surface will be compacted to a depth of 6 inches to 90 percent of its relative maximum density per ASTM D1557. Construction equipment may require decontamination after compaction of the subgrade. Depressions in the subgrade resulting from compaction will be restored to the lines and grades of the design with common fill. A liner system will be installed over the subgrade to prevent the remaining hydrocarbon materials from migrating to the surface. The liner system will consist of (from bottom to top): 12-ounce geotextile; a 12-inch layer of gravel with a triaxial geogrid installed mid-thickness; 12-ounce geotextile; 40-mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) liner; 12-ounce geotextile; variable thickness (0-18 inch) common fill; and 1-foot thickness of topsoil. An illustration of the liner section and the anchor trench detail is shown in Figure 44. Reservoir 3 – protective enclosure Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 63 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 The lower portion of the liner system is intended to bridge potentially soft portions of the remaining soils in the reservoir. A 12-ounce non-woven geotextile will be installed to ensure that fine soil particles do not migrate into the gravel layer. A 6-inch thickness of gravel will be placed over the geotextile. The initial 6-inch layer will be nominally compacted by at least one pass of a steel drum roller. A triaxial geogrid (Tensar TX-160, or equivalent) will be installed per manufacturer’s specifications and secured in an anchor trench around the perimeter of the original reservoir bottom Figure 43). The geogrid will be covered with an additional 6-inch layer of gravel. As noted above, the purpose of this component of the liner system is support. For design purposes, it has been assumed that the center of the cap tries to settle by approximately 2 feet, equivalent to a 50 percent consolidation of the original impacted soil remaining between the excavation bottom and the original reservoir bottom. While each of the geosynthetic materials can readily accept the resulting strain, it is expected that the strain will be taken up first by the geogrid, which is designed for this type of application. Further, the geogrid will better distribute loads across the foundation, lessening the potential for differential settlement. This type of geogrid better at locking aggregate materials and provides superior load distribution than bi-axial geogrids. Supporting calculations for the geosynthetics are provided in Appendix I. Three additional geosynthetic components will be placed on the compacted gravel. These will consist of a 40-mil HDPE flexible membrane liner (FML) over a 12-ounce non-woven geotextile and beneath a 12-ounce non-woven geotextile. The FML creates an impermeable barrier to future migration of hydrocarbon-impacted soils. It also will minimize infiltration losses from the overlying wetland. The primary purpose for the geotextiles is to protect the FML from punctures and abrasions due to angular particles in the common fill. A secondary purpose for the geotextiles is to assist in distributing soil loads and bridging soft soils. Since the subgrade slope is so mild 0.5 percent), the use of smooth rather than a textured FML will be acceptable. A variable thickness of common fill will be used to create a nominally level surface across the reservoir. It will be as much as 18 inches thick in the center of the reservoir and will taper out as it reaches the anchor trench bench (Figure 44). The common fill will be pushed onto the geosynthetics from a minimum 1-foot-thick layer. Equipment will not be allowed to operate directly on the geosynthetics. A 1-foot-thick layer of topsoil will be used to complete the cap. The top soils will only be nominally compacted, and will be scarified prior to revegetation. Restoration of the wetland habitat will be performed in accordance with the Restoration Plan. A primary design objective of this remedial alternative has been to facilitate restoration and improvement of the existing wetlands while removing the potential for contact with the hydrocarbon-impacted soils. The liner system provides separation, and the design grades are intended to direct water within the catchment of the reservoir (approximately 11.5 acres) to accumulate in the wetland complex. Seasonally, approximately 12.5 acre-feet of water will accumulate within the new 6.5-acre wetland complex. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 64 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Remediation at Reservoir 3 will impact existing wetlands, VPFS habitat, and sensitive plant species within the remediation boundary. Impacts and restoration to ecological resources will be detailed in the Restoration Plan. Some settlement is anticipated (and considered desirable) after construction of the cap. The various geosynthetic elements of the cap are capable of withstanding the likely strains that may be imposed during settlement and are reinforced with a geogrid designed to limit excessive settlement. The excavation plan is designed to provide some additional weight over the center of the reservoir and encourage the greatest relative amount of settlement at that location. This is intended to encourage water to pool towards the center of the reservoir. Settlement will be monitored by three settlement monuments, as shown in Figure 43. One will be located as near to the center of the reservoir as practical, a second will be installed over the cap towards the perimeter, and a third will be installed locally on undisturbed ground. These monuments will consist of the typical cap section but will be cast into concrete blocks approximately 12 inches on a side. Settlement will be monitored as part of the MRP to ensure that sufficient grade is maintained to provide adequate drainage and reduce excess ponding on top of the cap. 7.4.3 AOC #3 - Other Sticky Hydrocarbon Surface Expressions There are an additional 12 areas affected by plastic hydrocarbon surface expressions. These are shown in Figure 45. It is proposed to excavate these areas as described in Section 4.2, and backfill them with common fill and 1 foot of topsoil at the surface. Several of these areas are adjacent to or within the work areas for other remedial activities, such as Reservoir 5 and Reservoir 3. As a practical matter, those sites will be excavated in conjunction with preparing the work areas for the larger remedial activities. The 12 locations comprise 5.90 acres and are estimated to generate approximately 28,700 cubic yards of potentially hydrocarbon-impacted soil requiring offsite disposal. Backfilling the excavations will require 19,200 cubic yards of common earth and 9,500 cubic yards of topsoil. Impacts to waters/wetlands, VPFS habitat, and sensitive plant species communities will be detailed in the Restoration Plan. Each of the areas will be restored and revegetated as specified in the Restoration Plan. 7.4.4 AOC #4 - Arsenic The proposed actions for the arsenic in the open space area between Reservoir 2 and the southeastern development area include removal of the upper 1 to 3 feet (approximately 2,000 cubic yards of soil) with elevated arsenic concentrations and other metals in excess of background concentrations. The area has wetlands, VPFS habitat, and Congdon’s tarplant that would temporarily be affected by the remediation activities (see Appendix K). The removed soil will be placed within the proposed soil cap in the Northwest Operations Area. Excavation areas will be backfilled with onsite borrow soil to blend with surrounding topography. The impacted VPFS habitat, wetlands, and sensitive plant populations will be restored according to the guidelines of the project Restoration Plan. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 65 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 7.5 OU #5 - SITE-WIDE GROUNDWATER Monitored natural attenuation will be implemented using the same parameters and methods as specified in the MRP (Appendix B). However, remediation will require abandonment of several monitoring wells (Table 2). Replacement of wells needed for post-remediation monitoring will be determined in consultation with the RWQCB, which will also approve a revised MRP. At a minimum, monitoring groundwater for TPH and BTEX (consistent with MRP 93-120) will be performed at the remaining perimeter monitoring wells MW-49, MW-50, MW-56, and SLOW-17, and the offsite production wells 11Ea and 11Eb. Currently, monitoring is performed on a semiannual basis. After three years, the RWQCB will evaluate the semiannual groundwater data to determine if a reduction in the monitoring frequency is warranted. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 66 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 8.0 IMPACTS TO NATURAL RESOURCES AND MITIGATION The remedial actions described in this RAP will ultimately reduce potential human health and ecological risks. While these actions are being implemented, however, waters/wetlands, VPFS habitat, and other ecological resources will be impacted. The anticipated areas of impact and mitigation procedures will be summarized in the Restoration Plan. Actual impacts and proposed restoration will be detailed in surveys, monitoring, and the Restoration Plan. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 67 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 9.0 LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE Once the caps and other short-term remedial actions have been implemented, the long-term monitoring and maintenance phase of site remediation and closure will begin. Long-term monitoring is the remedial action for various groundwater impacts, as discussed in Section 4.1. Long-term maintenance is specified to ensure that those actions taken under this plan (e.g., excavations, cap construction) continue to achieve their remedial objectives. Remediation inspections will include excavation areas and constructed caps. The frequency of inspections will be established in consultation with the RWQCB and other appropriate regulatory agencies and will be included in the MRP. Monitoring of restoration areas will be in accordance with the Restoration Plan. Typical remediation area inspections will, at a minimum, look at the following: signs of erosion or burrowing by animals recurrence or new surface expressions of plastic hydrocarbon successful erosion control features integrity of fencing and other onsite ICs and ECs settlement Most of these activities will be visual inspections by trained technicians or subject experts. Settlement will be measured by properly trained technicians under the supervision of a surveyor or civil engineer licensed to practice in the state of California. Settlement measurements will monitor movement in the various caps to ensure that proper drainage is maintained so that excess ponding does not occur on top of the caps. Inspections will look for resurfacing of plastic hydrocarbon expressions at the excavation locations, especially if material at depths greater than 5 feet was left in place. Inspections will also include other areas of the site overlying impacted soils and will look for new surface expressions. In either case, resurfaced material will be removed using the standards and protocols described in this plan. Further recurrence of a surface expression will prompt evaluation and a focused remedial action. A contingency plan will be prepared and submitted to RWQCB for review (the RWQCB may solicit comments from other natural resource agencies, as appropriate) and approval prior to the implementation of long-term monitoring to ensure that resurfaced materials will be addressed upon discovery. The degree to which settlement is considered unacceptable will vary between caps. It is expected that significant settlement may occur at the Reservoir 3 cap. The geosynthetics are designed to accept strains of up to 2 feet. The caps to be built for Reservoirs 5 and 7 are somewhat more sensitive to settlement, in that it could compromise the void space available for groundwater to occupy. These caps can accept settlements up to 1 foot, measured at the former reservoir centers before remedial activity would need to be considered. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 68 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 The caps in future development areas are not expected to experience significant settlement prior to subsequent construction activities. It is anticipated, however, that any structures built on these caps will include careful geotechnical engineering that incorporates the limits and constraints of the caps as described in Sections 7.1.2 and 7.3. Over time, the caps may require maintenance. It is expected that this will be minor in nature and would include activities such as repairing drainages or discouraging bioturbation. It may also be necessary to reseed or replace topsoil if erosion is greater than expected or vegetation is slow to establish itself. More significant repairs would be made as needed, and would be based on observations made during the periodic inspections. This would include regrading if low spots were to develop in caps other than Reservoir 3. While Chevron is committed to ensuring the long-term maintenance of this project, the mechanism for implementation has not yet been determined. Chevron may utilize its own forces or out-source the work to a third party with experience in habitat maintenance. The specifics of implementing long-term site maintenance will be developed in concert with the project stakeholders, including the lead municipalities, to ensure the long-term success of the project. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 69 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 10.0 SCHEDULE A preliminary project schedule is shown in Figure 47. It provides a high-level view of the anticipated timeline of the principal project components. The project schedule anticipates the FEIR to be certified complete in the third quarter of 2014. Once the FEIR is certified, the RWQCB can approve the RAP and SLO County can approve and issue the Conditional Use Permit for remediation and restoration. At present, it is anticipated that three years will be necessary to complete all of the remedial actions. This schedule may be lengthened due to mitigation measures, weather impacts, or other constraints. The schedule anticipates that remedial construction will be completed near the middle of 2018. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 70 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 REFERENCES American Public Works Association, Southern California Chapter, 1997, “Standard Plans for Public Works Construction,” BNI Building News. Associated Transportation Engineer, November 9, 2007, Chevron San Luis Obispo Remediation Project, Traffic and Circulation Study. Avocet Environmental, Inc., March 15, 2007, Feasibility Study, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California. Avocet Environmental, Inc., December 18, 2007, Remedial Action Plan, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California. Avocet Environmental, Inc., January 26, 2009, Hydrology Study, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California. BBL Sciences, December 12, 2005, Risk Management Summary, Former Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California (Version 2.0). California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Human and Ecological Risk Division HERD), May 15, 1998, HERD Ecological Risk Assessment Note Number 1, http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/AssessingRisk/upload/econote1.pdf California Department of Transportation, 2003, Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Project Planning and Design Guide, April 2003. Cleath & Associates, 2002, Well Construction and Testing, Groundwater Exploration, San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Property, San Luis Obispo, California, September 30, 2002. City of San Luis Obispo, 2005, San Luis Obispo Airport Area Specific Plan, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department, August 2005. England Geosystem, Inc., November 1, 2000, Seep Evaluation Trenching Report, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County. England Geosystem, Inc., April 17, 2001, Limited Site Assessment, Former SLOCO Recycling Center, Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo County, California. England Geosystem, Inc., October 15, 2001, Supplemental Site Characterization, Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California. England, Shahin & Associates, May 11, 1994, Supplemental Ground Water Investigation, Unocal Tank Farm Facility, 276 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo, California. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 71 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 Fifield, J.S., 2004, Designing for Effective Sediment and Erosion Control on Construction Sites, Forester Communications, Inc., Santa Barbara. Frederick R.H., and J.F. Miller, 1979, Short Duration Rainfall Frequency Relations for California, Proceedings from the Third Conference on Hydrometrology, August 20-24, 1979, page 67. Goldman, S.J., K. Jackson, and T.A. Bursztynysky, 1986, Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York. ICBO, 1994, Uniform Building Code Volume 2, International Conference of Building Officials. Koerner, R.M., 1990, Designing with Geosynthetics, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Marine Research Specialists, December 2013, Chevron Tank Farm Remediation and Development Project Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). McDaniel Lambert, Inc., 2013, Updated Human Health Risk Assessment for the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Property, Version 2.0, January 30, 2013. Padre Associates, Inc., 2007a, Geotechnical Feasibility Study, Tank Farm Property Tank Farm Remedial Action Project San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, October 23, 2007 Padre Associates, Inc., 2007b, Project Execution Plan, December 20, 2007. Prussing, G. F., L.C. Hampton, and C.F. Lienesch, 1926, San Luis Obispo and Stewart Tank Farm Fires, April 7 to 11, 1926: Union Oil Company of California, Los Angeles, California, Engineering Department Report Dated November 1, 1926. Remediation Technology Panel (RTP), May 9, 2006, Remediation Technology Panel (RTP) Assessment of Off-Site Migration and On-Site Surface Expressions of Hydrocarbons at the San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site, prepared by Dr. David Huntley, San Diego State University; Dr. Paul Johnson, Arizona State University; and Dr. Kent Udell, University of California at Berkeley. Ratified May 9, 2006. Renard, K.G., 1997, Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 703. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Schroeder, P.R., T.S. Dozier, P.A. Zappi, B.M. McEnroe, J.W. Sjostrom, and R.L. Peyton, September 1994, The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering documentation for Version 3, EPA/600/9-94, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio. Final Remedial Action Plan Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Page 72 San Luis Obispo, California March 31, 2015 San Luis Obispo County, 2006, Private Sewage Disposal System, San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building Department, July 6, 2006 U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001, Urban Drainage Design Manual, Hydraulic Circular No. 22, Second Edition, August 2001. Viessman W., and G.L. Lewis, 1996, Introduction to Hydrology, Fourth Edition, Page183. Tables Table 1 Summary of Operable Units and Preferred Remedies Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm San Luis Obispo, California AOC #1 - LNAPL/BTEX-Impacted Groundwater Natural Attenuation + ICs + LTM Vapor Barriers Groundwater Use Restrictions AOC #2 - Surface Soils Capping + ICs + ECs + LTM Vapor Barriers Use Restrictions Notice of Subsurface Chemicals of Concern Groundwater Use Restrictions OU #2 - Reservoirs 5 & 7 - Capping + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions OU #3 - Reservoir 4 - Capping/Excavation + ICs + ECs + LTM Vapor Barriers Use Restrictions Notice of Subsurface Chemicals of Concern AOC #1 - North Marsh Area Excavation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions AOC #2 - Reservoir 3 Capping + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions AOC #3 - PPSH Areas Excavation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions AOC #4 - Arsenic Excavation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions OU #5 - Site-Wide Groundwater - Natural Attenuation + ICs + LTM Use Restrictions Groundwater Use Restrictions Notes: BTEX = benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes ICs = institutional controls LNAPL = light nonaqueous-phase liquid LTM = long-term monitoring PPSH = pliable plastic surface hydrocarbon Institutional and engineering controls are briefly discussed in Section 3.0 OU #4 - Remaining Site-Wide Surface and Subsurface Soils Operable Unit (OU) Area of Concern (AOC) Preferred Remedy OU #1 - Northwest Operations Area Proposed Institutional and Engineering Controls Table 2 List of Active Monitoring Wells and Wells Proposed for Abandonment Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm San Luis Obispo, California Active Monitoring Well ID Northing feet) Easting feet) Ground Elevation feet) Total Depth feet) Proposed for Abandonment 11Ea 2,286,403.33 5,766,242.72 120.12 11Eb 2,285,788.14 5,765,801.69 118.48 11Ec 2,285,291.33 5,765,508.27 116.83 11Ed 2,284,934.66 5,765,842.84 120.62 11La 2,284,552.74 5,766,755.02 114.77 MW-17 2,286,370.00 5,770,908.56 142.51 20.0 X MW-18 2,286,168.77 5,770,163.88 142.48 21.5 X MW-19 2,285,775.94 5,769,634.88 138.72 21.0 MW-26 2,285,032.40 5,766,234.06 117.84 21.0 MW-27 2,285,626.38 5,766,432.64 119.38 22.5 MW-29 2,284,254.39 5,768,615.77 132.06 23.0 MW-35 2,284,544.36 5,769,095.02 132.93 30.0 MW-38 2,284,771.55 5,767,041.29 113.77 30.0 MW-39 2,284,782.44 5,766,583.53 114.57 30.0 MW-40 2,286,140.64 5,766,491.67 117.04 30.0 MW-41 2,286,496.67 5,766,672.93 118.48 30.0 MW-43 2,284,257.98 5,768,184.71 130.61 25.0 MW-45 2,284,500.98 5,767,405.38 127.51 31.0 MW-46 2,284,071.49 5,767,817.56 131.14 30.0 MW-47 2,284,997.98 5,766,065.13 118.12 100.0 MW-48D 2,285,438.75 5,766,297.58 119.40 40.0 MW-48S 2,285,438.75 5,766,297.58 119.50 20.0 MW-49 2,286,660.91 5,766,079.56 122.55 40.0 MW-50 2,286,893.20 5,766,084.77 121.40 40.0 MW-53D 2,285,863.52 5,766,440.08 118.00 40.0 MW-53S 2,285,863.52 5,766,440.08 118.20 20.0 MW-56 2,286,751.61 5,766,088.21 120.67 41.5 SLOW-12 2,286,835.65 5,766,153.13 120.39 15.0 X SLOW-17 2,286,602.27 5,766,284.93 120.46 28.0 SLOW-18 2,286,728.07 5,766,212.88 120.21 26.0 X Table 3 Estimated Borrow Source Quantities Chevron San Luis Obispo Tank Farm San Luis Obispo, California Area Topsoil cy) Common Earth cy) Gravel cy) Offsite Cut cy) Borrow Area - 1 9,000 27,200 0 0 Borrow Area - 2 20,700 0 0 0 Borrow Area - 3 16,900 33,750 0 0 Oxbow Borrow 2,800 25,500 0 0 Borrow Area - Flower Mound(1)0 268,000 82,000 73,700 Reservoir 5 & 7 Berms 0 71,600 0 0 Total 49,400 426,050 82,000 73,700 Notes: 1) The Flower Mound borrow volume consists of onsite material only. Grading will generate approximately 73,700 cy of material outside of the property boundary. cy = cubic yard Figures SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AIRPORT TANK FARMROADHIGUERA STREETS:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_ Work_Activities\1306. 003_2013_Work_Activities\ ArcMapDocuments\020_ 1306.003_ Site_Location_Map.mxd\ 4/ 10/ 2014FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATIONMAPREMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA PREPARED RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA FIRE SCHOOLAREAEXISTINGBUILDINGS TANK FARM ROAD NORTH MARSH SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT TRAILER PARK FLOWER MOUND Tank Farm CreekEastForkSan LuisObispoCreekSANTA FE ROADAcacia CreekS:\ GIS\1306_SLOTF-EMC_Work_ Activities\1306. 003_2013_ Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\023_ 1306. 003_Site_Map. mxd\ 4/ 22/ 2013FIGURE 2 SITEMAP REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK ORIGINAL BUILDING ORIGINAL BUILDING EXISTING FIRE WATER TANK TANK FARM ROAD FORMER FIRE SCHOOL LOCATION TRENCH USED BY THE FORMER FIRE SCHOOL FORMER PUMP STATION LOCATION REMOVED) MAIN ACCESS GATE B-33 B-35 B-36 SLOW-18 MW-50 MW-56 SLOW-12 MW-49 ACCESS ROADAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC TANK &LEACH LINES 6" WATER8" RELIEF LINE8" 8" BYPASS10" 3"8" 8" 16" 6"16"16"16" 8"16"3" 10"8" RELIEF 10" 16" LOCATION OF ABANDONED AND DEMOLISHED FORMER HEATER FORMER GASOLINE AST LOCATION EXISTING OIL LINE "A"4" GAS LINE 2" GAS LINE 2" GAS LINE REPORTED TO BE ABANDONED STORAGE CONTAINER APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC TANK PADS FOR FORMER FIRE PUMPS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ABANDONED WATER SUPPLY WELL No. 2 16" PIPE LINE FOUNDATION OF FORMER ELECTRICAL HOUSE VAULTS VAULTS FORMER LINE No. 2 TO SANTA MARGARITA APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ABANDONED 12" DIA.WELL No. 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER 55, 000 BBL ABOVE GROUND TANK - AST 522 DEMOLISHED BETWEEN 1959 AND 1965)FORMER FIRE SCHOOL AST LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER 55,000 BBL ABOVE GROUND TANK NOT REBUILT AFTER 1926 FIRE) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER 55,000 BBL ABOVE GROUND TANK - USED FOR FIRE WATER STORAGE FROM APPROXIMATELY 1994-2004 REMOVED AUGUST 2000) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER 55,000 BBL ABOVE GROUND TANK REMOVED 1994) LEACH FEILD NEW MODULAR OFFICE BUILDING PETROLEUM TESTING LABORATORY OPERATIONAL WATER SUPPLY WELL (SUPPLIES NON- POTABLE WATER TOSITE) FOUNDATION OF FORMER BOILER AND TANK LOCATIONS SCALE 0 80 160 FEETV:\1212_ Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_ Remedial_Design\ 013_1212. 001_Historical_Operations_Area. dwg\04/17/ 14N FIGURE 3 NORTHWEST OPERATIONS AREA HISTORICAL AND CURRENT FEATURES REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX LEGEND 125 EXISTING LIGHT POLE FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING MONITORING / PRODUCTION WELL WATER LINE DRAIN LINE CRUDE OIL GAS - CRUDE OIL GAS - OIL GAS GASOLINE REFERENCE:1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH BY CENTRAL COAST AERIAL PMAPPING,DATED MARCH 2, 2007.2. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS AND FEATURES PROVIDED BY EDA,DATED JULY 2007.NOTES:1. FIGURE ONLY SHOWS THE PRINCIPAL HISTORIC ELEMENTS OF THE OPERATIONS AREA. THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ILLUSTRATES THE CURRENT CONDITIONS. THE HIGHLIGHTED ELEMENTS WERE IN- PLACE PRIOR TO 1994 (WHEN PETROLEUM OPERATIONS CEASED). SHADED ELEMENTS HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED OR RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA T A N K F A R M R O A D NORTH MARSH EXISTING STRUCTURES AERIAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE (PG&E) AERIAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE (PG&E) AND TELECOMM SERVICE (ATT) AERIAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE (PG&E) AND TELECOMM SERVICE (ATT) UNDERGROUND 4" DIA. H.P. GAS SERVICE (THE GAS CO.) UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE (PG&E) SEWER LIFT STATION S:\GIS\ 1212_Chevron_ Padre_SLOTF\001_ Remedial_Design\ArcMapDocuments\005_1212. 001_Existing_ Utilities_Easements. mxd\12/17/07FIGURE 4 EXISTING UTILITIES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANSAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0 500 1,000250 EXPLANATION PROJECT AREA RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA T A N K F A R M R O A D NORTH MARSH OCCUPIED OFFICE STUCTURES FORMER FIRE SCHOOL LOCATION S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF- EMC_Work_Activities\ 1306.003_2013_Work_Activities\ ArcMapDocuments\024_ 1306.003_ Chevron_Pipelines.mxd\4/ 11/ 2014FIGURE 5 CHEVRON PIPELINES REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRONEMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA EXPLANATION PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY CRUDE OIL PIPELINES OTHER UNDERGROUND PIPELINES APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0 500 1,000250 SEE FIGURE 6 FOR DETAIL NOTES:1) LEACH LINES AND DRAIN LINES ARE SHOWN AS CRUDE OIL LINES ON THIS FIGURE FOR CLARITY. SIMILIARLY FOAMITE LINES ARE SHOWN AS WATER LINES DUE TO THEIR SIMILIAR FUNCTIONS DURING OPERATIONS. 2) UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. ACTUAL LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD.3) PORTIONS OF CRUDE OIL AND WATER LINES EXTENDING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF TANK FARM ROAD WERE REMOVED AS PART OF THE CITY'S SEWER PROJECT IN 2008.SUMMARY OF PIPELINE LENGTHS LENGTH ( FEET)25,125 258 914 38,263 9,177 TYPES CRUDE OIL LEACH LINE SANITATION)DRAIN LINES WATER LINE FOAMITE REFERENCES:1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2008 2. GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM, PRODUCERS PIPELINE, UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, DRAWING No. UNKNOWN, DATED APRIL 3, 1950.GENERAL ORIGINAL BUILDING ORIGINAL BUILDING TANK FARMROADSTOPFORMER FIRE SCHOOL LOCATION TRENCH USED BY THE FORMER FIRE SCHOOL FOUNDATION OF FORMER BOILER AND TANK LOCATIONS FORMER PUMP STATION LOCATION REMOVED) MAIN ACCESS GATE ACCESS ROADAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC TANK &LEACH LINES EXISTING OIL LINE " A"4" GAS LINE 2" GAS LINE STORAGE CONTAINER APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC TANK PADS FOR FORMER FIRE PUMPS 16" PIPE LINE VAULTS VAULTS FORMER LINE No. 2 TO SANTA MARGARITA LEACH FEILD OPERATIONAL WATER SUPPLY WELL ( SUPPLIES NON-POTABLE WATER TO SITE)NEW MODULAR OFFICE BUILDING PETROLEUM TESTING LABORATORY 6" WATER8" RELIEF LINE8" 8" BYPASS10" 3"8" 8" 16" 6"16"16"16" 8"16"3" 10"8" RELIEF 10" 16"LOCATION OF ABANDONED AND DEMOLISHED FORMER HEATER FORMER GASOLINE AST LOCATION 2" GAS LINE REPORTED TO BE ABANDONED FOUNDATION OF FORMER ELECTRICAL HOUSE LEACH FEILD APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC TANK &LEACHLINES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING PVC WATER LINE SCALE 0 80 160 FEETV:\ 1212_Padre-Chevron_ SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_Design\ 026_1212. 001_Detail_ Chevron_Pipelines_NW_Ops_ Area.dwg\04/ 10/14N FIGURE 6 DETAIL PLAN OF CHEVRON PIPELINES IN NORTHWEST OPERATIONS AREA REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX LEGEND 125 WATER LINE DRAIN LINE CRUDE OIL GAS - CRUDE OIL GAS - OIL GAS GASOLINE REFERENCES:1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH BY CENTRAL COAST AERIAL MAPPING.DATED MARCH 2, 2007 2. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS AND FEATURES PROVIDED BY EDA, INC. RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA 16.85 ACRES 19.13 ACRES 258.19 ACRES 30.65 ACRES 15.18ACRESS:\GIS\1306_ SLOTF-EMC_Work_Activities\1306. 003_2013_Work_ Activities\ArcMapDocuments\025_ 1306.003_Existing_SLO_County_ Land_Use_ Plan.mxd\ 4/28/2013FIGURE 7 EXISTING SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LANDUSE PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA APPROXIMATE SCALE RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA 295.90 ACRES 7.8 ACRES 2.3 ACRES13.6 ACRES COLLECTOR ROAD UNOCAL COLLECTOR ROADS A N T A F E R O A D E X T E N S I O N 18. 2 ACRES 2. 2 ACRES REFERENCE: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2008.SOURCE: AIRPORT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN,SAN LUIS OBISPO, JANUARY 2005 EXPLANATION PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS PARK SERVICE & MANUFACTURING PUBLIC OPEN SPACE APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0500 1,000250S:\ GIS\1306_ SLOTF-EMC_Work_ Activities\1306.003_2013_ Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\ 026_1306.003_City_SLO_ AASP_Land_ Use_Plan. mxd\5/6/2013FIGURE 8 CITY RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_ Work_Activities\1306.003_2013_Work_ Activities\ArcMapDocuments\029_ 1306.003_Constraints_ Proposed_SLO_Land_Use.mxd\ 8/8/ 2014FIGURE 9 CONSTRAINTS TO THE PROPOSED CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO LAND USE PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA REFERENCE: AERIAL DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2008. SOURCE: AIRPORT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, SAN LUIS OBISPO. DATED: JANUARY 2005 APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0 500 1,000250 EXPLANATION RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS PARK SERVICE & MANUFACTURING 5 ACRES 274 ACRES 15 ACRES 5 ACRES 5 ACRES 4 ACRES 21 ACRES 1 ACRE 2 ACRES 8 ACRES COLLECTOR ROAD S A N T A F E R O A D E X T E N S I O N S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_Work_ Activities\1306.003_ 2013_Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\038_ 1306.003_ Proposed_Land_ Use.mxd\5/6/ 2013FIGURE 10 PROPOSED LAND USE CONCEPT REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA REFERENCE:AERIALPHOTOGRAPH V:\1306_SLOTF_EMC_Work_Activities\ RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA BETITA PROPERTY 801 mg/kg 1,151 mg/kg 488 mg/kg WETLANDS IMPACTED BY ASPHALTIC CRUST T-8-0.5 T-2-0.5 T-17-0.5 S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_Work_ Activities\1306.003_ 2013_Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\031_ 1306.003_ Summary_Environmental_ Impacts.mxd\4/28/2013FIGURE 13 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA05001,000250 Feet Approximate Scale EXPLANATION TPH IN SOIL > 100 mg/kg EXTENT OF BTEX LIQUID CRUDE OIL. CAPABLE OF GENERATING FREE" DROPLETS OF OIL. ( EVALUATED FOR REMEDIATION IN FEASIBILITY STUDY)PLIABLE, HIGHLY WEATHERED CRUDE OIL.EVIDENCE OF RECENT PLASTIC FLOW. EVALUATED FOR REMEDIATION IN FEASIBILITY STUDY)SOLID, FORMER CRUDE OIL PLIABLE, HIGHLY WEATHERED CRUDE OIL.NO EVIDENCE OF PLASTIC FLOW LNAPL OCCURANCE PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY TPH IN SOIL > 1, 000 mg/kg SOIL SAMPLE SHOWING LEAD CONCENTRATION IN mg/kg RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA T A N K F A R M R O A D NORTH MARSH PROPOSED STOCKPILE LOCATION 7.41 AC 239,000 CY AT 20' AVERAGE HEIGHT PROVIDE SILT FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL ALONG CREEK EDGE ON SITE ACCESS TO STOCKPILE AREA AT THIS LOCATION SECONDARY STOCKPILE LOCATION APPROXIMATELY 1 AC/±15,000 CY) S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_ Work_Activities\ 1306.003_2013_ Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\033_1306. 003_Proposed_ Impacted_Soil_ Stockpile_Location.mxd\4/ 28/ 2013FIGURE 15 PROPOSED IMPACTED SOILSTOCKPILE LOCATIONS REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0 500 1,000250 EXPLANATION PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY REFERENCE: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2008. NOTES:1. THE STOCKPILE WILL ONLY BE USED IN THE EVENT OFF-SITE TRUCK TRIPS ARE LIMITED, BUT EXCAVATION OF IMPACTED SOILS NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.2. STOCKPILING WILL OCCUR AFTER BUILDING DEMOLITION, PIPELINE ABANDONMENT AND GENERAL RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA T A N K F A R M R O A D NORTH MARSH REPORTED HISTORIC DISPOSAL AREA GROSS AREA 1.57 AC BORROW No. 1 GROSS AREA 8.6 AC COMMON EARTH 27,200 CY TOPSOIL 9,000 CY RESERVOIR5BORROWBERM COMMON EARTH 38,800 CY BORROW No. 3 EXISTING WETLANDS 6.4 AC COMMON EARTH 33,750 CY TOPSOIL 16,900 CY RESERVOIR7BORROWBERM COMMON EARTH 32,800 CY BORROW No. 2 GROSS AREA 8.5 AC TOPSOIL 20,700 CY FLOWER MOUND GROSS AREA 25 AC COMMON EARTH 268.000 CY GRAVEL 82,000 CY OFF-SITE GRADING GROSS AREA 4.1 AC COMMON EARTH 73,660 CY OXBOW BORROW COMMON EARTH 25,500 CY TOP SOIL 2800CYS:\ GIS\1306_ SLOTF-EMC_Work_Activities\ 1306.003_2013_ Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\034_1306. 003_Borrow_ Source_Location_ Map.mxd\8/8/ 2014FIGURE 16 BORROW SOURCE LOCATION MAPREMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0 500 1, 000250 REFERENCE:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2008.NOTE:NEW WETLANDS ASSUME THAT THE ENTIRE BORROW AREA IS USED TO RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA T A N K F A R M R O A D NORTH MARSH EXISTING WATER SUPPLY WELL SUGGESTED CONTRACTOR WATER TANK LOCATION ACCESS GATE IMPROVED ENTRANCE AND NEW GATE EXISTING GATE ELECTRICITY AND TELEPHONE AVAILABLE FROM OVERHEAD SERVICE HERE PRIMARY STAGING AREA INCLUDING CONTRACTORS SUPPORT TRAILERS AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YARD WELL No. 2 WELL No. 3 WELL No. 1 OU#3 AND FLOWER MOUND INTEGRATED DISTURBANCE AREA TEMPORARY WATERLINE J-STANDPROTECTTEMPORARY WATERLINE AT ENTRANCE S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_ Work_Activities\1306.003_2013_ Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\ 035_1306.003_Work_Areas_ Staging_Areas_ Access.mxd\ 8/13/2014FIGURE 17 PROPOSED WORK AREAS, STAGING AREAS, ANDSITE ACCESS REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0 500 1,000250REFERENCE:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH BY COASTAL AERIAL MAPPING DATED: 03/ 02/ 2007 NOTES:1. PRIMARY STAGING AREA WILL BE LOCATED AT THE FORMER RECYCLING AREA TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICES.2. ACCESS ROUTES WILL, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL, USE EXISTING TRAILS. ROUTES WILL BE WIDENED, AS NECESSARY, TO SAFELY ACCOMODATE TWO-WAY TRAFFIC.3. CONTRACTOR MAY SUGGEST ALTERNATIVE ROUTES, ESPECIALLY IF ONE- WAY TRAFFIC WILL PROVIDE SAFER ACCESS. ALTERNATIVE ROUTES MAY NOT CAUSE ADDITIONAL IMPACTS TO PROTECTED OR SENSITIVE HABITAT NOT OTHERWISE DESCRIBED FOR THIS PROJECT.4. CONSTRUCTION WATER MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE EXISTING WATER SUPPLY WELL.5. ONSITE WATER FROM THE EXISTING WELLS ARE NOT POTABLE. CONTRACTOR WILL SUPPLY BOTTLED WATER FOR POTABLE USES.6. CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE PORTABLE SANITATION FACILITIES AT STAGING AND WORK AREAS, AS NEEDED.7. WELL Nos. 1, 2, AND 3 ARE CONSTRUCTED BUT ARE NOT EQUIPED WITH PUMPS OR OTHER ANCILLARY PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT. THEY MAY BE USED TO SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION WATER,BUT THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SUPPLY THE EQUIPMENT, POWER, AND TEMPORARY PIPELINES NECESSARY TO BRING THEM INTO SERVICE. 8. THE WORK AREA FOR OU# 3 IS CONTIGUOUS WITH THE DISTURBANCE AREA FOR THE FLOWER MOUND BORROW AND GRADING. B !B!B B !B B B B B!B B B B B RESERVOIR 4 NW OPERATIONS AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA EW-1 B-57 B-36 B-35 B-33 11La 11Ed 11Eb 11Ea OMW-6 OEW-2 TMW-9 TMW-8 MW-56 MW-47 MW-46 MW-45 MW-44 MW-43 MW-41 MW-40 MW-39 MW-38 MW-37 MW-35 MW-32 MW-29 MW-27 MW-26 MW-19 MW-18 MW-17 MW-12 MW-11 MW-50 MW-49 MW-53SMW-53D MW-48SMW-48D SLOW-12 SLOW-18/BIV-25 SLOW-17/BIV-24 11Ec SLOW-16/BIV-30 OMW-2 OMW-7 S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_ Work_ Activities\1306.003_ 2013_Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments\037_ 1306.003_ GW_Monitoring_ Network_Modifications_.mxd\4/ 17/ 2014FIGURE 20 MONITORING WELL NETWORK MODIFICATIONSREMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FORCHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA EXPLANATION APPROXIMATE SCALE FEET 0 500 1,000250 PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY WELL TO BE 6" WATER8" RELIEF LINE8" 8" BYPASS10" 3" 8"8" 16" 6" 16"16" 16"8" 16" 3"10"8" RELIEF 10" 16"BUILDING BUILDING BUILDINGGUARD/OFFICE BUILDING TANK FARM ROADSTOPFORMER FIRE TRENCH) FORMER BOILER AND TANK LOCATIONS FORMER PUMP STATION FOUNDATION B- 33 B- 35 B- 36 SLOW-18 MW- 50 MW-56 SLOW-12 MW-49 ACCESS ROADEXISTING OIL LINE " B"ABANDON IN PLACE EXISTING OIL LINE "A" ABANDON IN PLACE DISCONNECT AND CAP BRANCH OFF EXISTING 4- INCH DIA.GAS LINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC TANK AND LEACH LINES FORMER GASOLINE AST LOCATION STORAGE CONTAINER TO BE REMOVED BY CHEVRON PLANTER DEMOLISH CONCRETE FOOTINGS DEMOLISH CONCRETE PAD APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC TANK EXISTING FENCE,REMOVE FOR CONSTRUCTION RETAINING WALL WORK CORRIDOR ELECTRICAL PANELS ELECTRICAL PANEL REMOVE MAIN GATE AND BOLLARDS ELECTRICAL AND SIGNS OIL/WATER SEPERATOR EXISTING FENCE REMOVE FOR CONSTRUCTION VAULTS - DEMOLISH AND REMOVE CONCRETE PAD CONCRETE PAD WITH RAISED WALLS,DEMOLISHAND REMOVE EXISTING PRODUCTION WELL PROTECT- IN-PLACE)FORMER SHED CONCRETE PADFORMER ELECTRICAL HOUSE FOUNDATION,DEMOLISH AND REMOVE CLEAR AREA FOR FUTURE TANK FARM ROAD R-O- W FIRE HYDRANT DEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDING DEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDING LIMIT OF EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT EXISTING LIGHT STANDARDS - REMOVE CONCRETE FOUNDATION DEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDING DEMOLISH EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGOVERHEADPOWER LINES 2" GAS LINE REPORTED TO BE ABANDONED2" GAS LINE CUT AND CAPPED BELOW GROUND 4" GAS LINE PROTECT- IN- PLACE)FENCE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING WATER TANK 4" WATER LINE 2" GAS LINE REMOVE) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING LEACH LINES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER LINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF OVERHEAD POWER LINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE SCALE 0 80 160 FEET LEGEND V:\1212_Padre- Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_ Design\017_ 1212.001_ NW_Operations_Area_Demo_ Subgrade_Plan.dwg\ 05/12/ 14N FIGURE 21 NORTHWEST OPERATIONS AREA OU # 1/AOC #2) DEMOLITION PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX EXISTING BUILDING 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE OPERABLEUNIT FORMER FIRE SCHOOL LOCATION EXISTING TRENCH FORMER BOILER AND TANK LOCATIONS FORMER PUMP STATION LOCATION - REMOVED SEE NOTE?) EXISTING MAIN ACCESS GATE TANK FARMROADSTOPEXISTING PRODUCTION WELL OU #1 BOUNDARY B-33 B-35 B-36 MW-50 MW-56 MW-49 50' INLET 2 BOX CULVERTS ANTICIPATED FUTURE TANK FARM ROAD ROW PROVIDE 4" DIA. UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SLOPE SIDES 4:1 TOE OF SLOPE ENERGY DISSIPATER RR-1 121 120121122122 123 INLETS 2-24" DIA. CMP CULVERTS 11 CLEAR AND GRADE TO DRAIN 2) 18" DIA. CMP CULVERTS EROSION CONTROL REPLACE FENCE 12 ENERGY DISSIPATER RR-2 END OF (2) 18" DIA. CMP CULVERTS FL ELEV. 121.00 BEGIN (2) 18" DIA. CMP CULVERTS FL ELEV. 121.50 REPLACE FENCE SM-3 SM-2 SM-1 DITCH NW-6DITCHNW-7 DITCH NW-10 DITCH NW-9 DITCH NW-8 DITCH NW-1 DITCH NW-2 DITCH NW-3 DITCH NW-5 DITCH NW-4 DITCH NW-14 DITCH NW-11 DITCH NW-13 CATTLE CROSSING DITCH NW-12 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-1A ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-2A B-57 120124 120 SLOPE SIDES 4:1 SCALE 0 80 160 FEET LEGEND V:\ 1212_Padre- Chevron_SLOTF\1212. 001_Remedial_Design\018_ 1212.001_NW_ Operations_Area_Final_ Grade_Plan.dwg\05/12/ 14N FIGURE 22 NORTHWEST OPERATIONS AREA OU #1/ AOC # 2)CAP GRADING PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA REFERENCE: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PROVIDED BY CENTRAL COAST AERIAL MAPPING, DATED MARCH 2, 2007.SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX EXISTING BUILDING 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE OPERABLE UNIT BOUNDARY EXISTING MONITORING / SUPPLY ELEVATION ( ft)ELEVATION ( ft)STATION 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 0+50.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00. 00 6+50. 00 SEE FIGURE 25 TIE INTO EXISTING GRADE SEE FIGURE 26 TIE INTO EXISTING GRADE TOP OF CAP STRUCTURAL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE MAXIMUM DENSITY 12 oz.NON- WOVEN GEOTEXTILE UNDISTURBED EARTH 4' MIN EXISTING GROUND SURFACE B B'V:\ 1212_Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\ 1212.001_Remedial_ Design\043_1212. 001_Northwest_Operations_Area_Sections. dwg\05/ 12/14FIGURE 24 NORTHWEST OPERATIONS AREA OU #1/ AOC #2)SECTION B- B'REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS ELEVATION ( ft)ELEVATION ( ft)STATION 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 0+00.00 0+25.00 0+50. 00 0+65. 00 TANK FARM ROAD EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT REPLACE EXISTING FENCE ASSUMED DEPTH OF EXISTING 4"DIA. GAS LINE, PROTECT- IN- PLACE EXISTING WATER LINE DEPTH UNKNOWN) FUTURE HIGHWAY ROW 4' 1'DITCH FLOW LINE ELEV. 120.3 4 1 12 oz. NON- WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SUBGRADE PREPARATION LAYER STRUCTURAL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE MAXIMUM DENSITY UNDISTURBED EARTH CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE 2' DITCH AND SLOPES TO BE ROUGHENED AND REVEGETATED 1' MIN 3' MINSCALE 0 5 10 FEETV:\1212_ Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\1212. 001_Remedial_Design\ 019_1212.001_ NW_Operations_Area_Sections.dwg\ 05/12/ 14FIGURE 25 NORTHWEST OPERATIONS AREA OU # EW-1 MW-32 MW-41 215 FT FOUNDATION OF LIGHTENING TOWER NO. 13 PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE REMOVE (TYPICAL)CUT AND CAP HERE ABANDON EXISTING MONITORING WELLS CONCRETE FOUNDATION REMOVE AND DISPOSE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF LATERAL FROM 10" CRUDE OIL LINE TO RESERVOIR 5 FORMER 10" DIA CRUDE-OIL LINE ABANDONED- IN-PLACE REMAINS OF PIPELINE REMOVE AND DISPOSE REMOVE EXISTING FENCE AND NETTING BARBED WIRE FENCE REMOVE AND DISPOSE CONCRETE RUBBLE REMOVE AND DISPOSE DATA LOGGER REMOVE HYDROCARBON SEEPAGE TEST STRUCTURE- ABANDON CONSTRUCT ANCHOR TRENCH FOR GEOTEXTILE STEEL HOOP REMOVE AND DISPOSE FOUNDATION OF LIGHTNING TOWER NO. 11 REMOVE AND DISPOSE FOUNDATION OF LIGHTENING TOWER NO. 12 REMOVE AND DISPOSE BARBED WIRE FENCE REMOVE AND DISPOSE APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF CONCRETE WALL CONCRETE ON SLOPE REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXCAVATE IMPACTED SOILS TO EXPOSE ORIGINAL CONRETE BOTTOM EL 119.50)CLEAR AND GRUB LINE DEFINES LIMITS OF WORK AREA WATER LINE - REMOVE IF EXPOSED OTHERWISE ABANDON IN-PLACE DATA LOGGER REMOVE SCALE 0 80 160 FEET LEGEND V:\ 1212_Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\ 1212.001_ Remedial_Design\015_ 1212.001_Reservoir_5_Existing_ Conds_Demo_ Plan.dwg\ 05/12/14N FIGURE 28 RESERVOIR 5 (OU #2)DEMOLITION PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA FENCEX APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 4" WATERLINE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION REMEDIATION REQUIRED MONITORING WELL PROTECT IN PLACE) MW-37 STANDPIPE REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXPOSED PIPELINE REMOVE AND DISPOSE CONCRETE DOWN-DRAIN FOR PERIMETER ROOF GUTTER REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXCAVATE IMPACTED SOILS TO EXPOSE ORIGINAL CONCRETE BOTTOM (± EL 116.50) PIPELINE AND CONCRETE TROUGH REMOVE AND DISPOSE CUT AND CAP LINE AT THIS LOCATION APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ABANDONED 12-INCH DIA. CRUDE OIL LINE SCALE 0 80 160FEETV:\ 1212_ Padre-Chevron_ SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_ Design\016_ 1212.001_Reservoir_ 7_Existing_Conds_Demo_Plan. dwg\04/ 17/14N FIGURE 29 RESERVOIR 7 ( OU # 2) DEMOLITION PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA LEGEND FENCEX APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 4" WATERLINE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB WETLAND - PROTECT- IN-PLACE WETLAND - IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ABANDON EXISTING SEEPAGE STRUCTURE R5-E REMOVE EXISTING FENCE AND NETTING MW-32 MW-41 MW-32 EW-1121120119 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 1 1 8 125124123122126BORROW DAYLIGHT PERIMETER DITCH R5-2 SEE NOTE 1) PERIMETER DITCH R5-1 SEE NOTE 1) CONTOUR GRADE FINISH SLOPE SEE NOTE 2) ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-4 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-3 MAX SLOPE9 % END DITCH R5- 2 END DITCH R5-1 TOE OF FILL SLOPE WETLANDS TO BE RESTORED SEE NOTE 3) SM-1 SM-2 SM- 3 REFERENCE:TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007.SCALE 0 80 160 FEET LEGEND V:\ 1212_Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\ 1212.001_Remedial_ Design\029_1212. 001_Reservoir_5_Cap_Grading_ Plan.dwg\ 05/12/ 14N FIGURE 30 RESERVOIR 5 ( OU #2)CAP GRADING PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA NOTES: 1. ESTABLISH DITCH FROM HIGHPOINT.ESTABLISH GENTLE CURVE FOR WATER COURSE USING CONTROL POINTS PROVIDED.DITCH SLOPE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 2%, NOR LESS THAN 0.5%. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTOUR GRADE BETWEEN THE CONTROL CONTOUR AND THE PERIMETER DITCH. GRADING SHALL MIMIC, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, NATURAL CONTOURS.SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 4:1, AND NO FLATTER THAN 0.5%.3. EXISTING WETLANDS DISTURBED WITHIN THE CLEAR AND GRUB AREA AND OUTSIDE THE FINAL GRADING AREA SHALL BE RESTORED AS DESCRIBED IN THE RESTORATION PLAN. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION REMEDIATION REQUIRED HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION MONITORING WELL PROTECT IN PLACE) MW-37 TREE PROTECT-IN-PLACE APPROXIMATE LOCATION ABANDONED 8-INCH DIA. CRUDE OIL LINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION ABANDONED 12-INCH DIA. CRUDE OIL LINE CLEAR AND GRUB LINE FILL CUT START OF DITCH R7-1 & R7-2 HP FL ELEV. 130.24 PERIMETER DITCH R7-1 SEE NOTE 2) PERIMETER DITCH R7-2 SEE NOTE 2) ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-6 CONTOUR GRADE FINISH SLOPE SEE NOTE 3) END OF DITCH R7-1 TOE OF FILL SLOPE END OF DITCH R7-2 WETLANDS TO BE RESTORED SEE NOTE 4) HP ELEV. 133.50 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-5 SM-1 SM-3 SM-2 REFERENCE: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007. SCALE 0 80 160 FEET LEGEND V:\ 1212_Padre- Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_ Remedial_Design\030_ 1212.001_Reservoir_ 7_Cap_Grading_Plan.dwg\ 05/12/ 14N FIGURE 31 RESERVOIR 7 (OU # 2)CAP GRADING PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE EXISTING MONITORING / SUPPLY WELL HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION REMEDIATION REQUIRED HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION REMEDIATION NOT REQUIRED CUT/FILL LINE RIDGE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB WETLAND-ROTECT-IN- PLACE WETLAND-IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. ALL WETLANDS OUTSIDE THE CLEAR AND GRUB LINE SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ESTABLISH DITCH FROM HIGHPOINT. ESTABLISH GENTLE CURVE FOR WATER COURSE USING CONTROL POINTS PROVIDED. DITCH SLOPE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 2%, NOR LESS THAN 0.5%. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTOUR GRADE BETWEEN THE CONTROL CONTOUR AND THE PERIMETER DITCH.GRADING SHALL MIMICK, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE,NATURAL CONTOURS. SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 4:1, AND NO FLATTER THAN 0.5%.4. EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN THE CLEAR ELEVATION ( ft)ELEVATION ( ft)STATION 85.00 95.00 105.00 115.00 125.00 135.00 145.00 155.00 165.00 85.00 95.00 105.00 115.00 125.00 135.00 145.00 155.00 165.00 1+00.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00. 009+00. 00 FINISH GRADEEXTENT OF GRAVEL LAYER APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF CONCRETE FLOOR APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ORIGINAL BERM EXISTING BERM USE AS BORROW FOR STRUCTURAL FILL TIE INTO EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE REMOVE EXISTING MATERIAL AND DEBRIS TO EXPOSE CONCRETE FLOOR EXPOSE AND REMOVE ANY REMAINING CONCRETE ON SLOPE 4 (MAX) 1 STRUCTURAL FILL COMPACT TO AT LEAST 90% RELATIVE MAXIMUM DENSITY (ASTM D1557)GOETEXTILE ANCHOR TRENCH 12 oz. NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 1-FOOT THICK (MIN.)GROWTH MEDIUM SEE NOTE 5)DETAIL 1 ON FIGURE 33 DETAIL 2 ON FIGURE 33 0 80 160FEET 0 40 80 FEETV:\1212_Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\ 1212.001_ Remedial_Design\020_ 1212.001_Reservoir_5_Section_ G.dwg\ 05/12/ 14FIGURE 32 RESERVOIRS 5 AND 7 ( OU #2) 3' 1' 12 oz. GEOTEXTILE LINER GRAVEL CONCRETE ON SLOPE REMOVED) SHELF FOR ANCHOR TRENCH EXISTING GRADE BACKFILL TO ANCHOR GEOTEXTILE AND COMPACT TO 90% RELATIVE MAXIMUM DENSITY PER ASTM D1557) 3' VARIES 2' (MIN.) 1' (MIN.) GROWTH MEDIUM STRUCTURAL FILL GEOTEXTILE GRAVEL EXISTING CONCRETE RESERVOIR BOTTOM EXISTING SUBGRADE 1.5' (MIN.) TOP OF GRAVEL ELEV. RESERVOIR 5: 119.20 RESERVOIR 7: 123.50 HIGH GROUNDWATER ELEV. RESERVOIR 5: 117.70 RESERVOIR 7: 122.00 TOP OF CONC. ELEV. RESERVOIR 5: 116.00 RESERVOIR 7: 116.50 0 8 16 FEETSCALEV:\1212_Padre- Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_Design\ 020_1212.001_ Reservoir_5_Section_ G.dwg\04/17/14FIGURE 33 RESERVOIRS 5 AND 7 (OU #2)TYPICAL CAP DETAILS REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK RESERVOIR 4 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA T A N K F A R M R O A D BORROW No. 2GROSSAREA8.54ACTOPSOIL20,700 CY FLOWER MOUND/OU #3GROSSAREA55.1ACCOMMONEARTH317,162 CY OFF-SITEGRADINGGROSSAREA4.1ACCOMMONEARTH73,660 CY S:\GIS\ 1212_Chevron_Padre_SLOTF\ 001_Remedial_Design\ArcMapDocuments\022_1212. 001_Res_ 4-OU3_Flower_Mound_Borrow_2_Work_ Areas.mxd\12/18/07FIGURE 34 RESERVOIR 4 (OU #3),FLOWER MOUND, AND BORROW No. 2 WORK AREAS REMEDIAL ACTION PLANSAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FORCHEVRON EMCSAN LUISOBISPO, TANK FARM ROAD EXISTING FENCE PROTECT-IN-PLACE NEW FENCE EXISTING FENCE REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING FENCE PROTECT-IN-PLACE ASPHALTIC MATERIAL EXISTING WETLAND 0.068 Ac REMOVE ASPHALTIC MATERIAL ASPHALTIC MATERIAL ASPHALTIC LOCATION OF ROOF FOUNDATION ASPHALTIC MATERIAL EXISTING WETLAND 0.044 Ac REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY POLES PROTECT-IN-PLACE FORMER PUMP-HOUSE CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS REMOVE AND DISPOSE FORMER 10-INCH CRUDE-OIL LINE REMOVE AND DISPOSE NEW FENCE ABANDON FENCE CUT AND CAP WATERLINE EXISTING WETLAND 0.023 Ac REMOVE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER CONCRETE FOUNDATION OF FORMER RESERVOIR WALL FORMER CRUDE-OIL PIPELINE CONCRETE FOUNDATION LIGHTNING TOWER No. 2 REMOVE AND DISPOSE 4" DIA. FIRE WATER DISTRIBUTION LINE CLEAR AND GRUB LINE EXISTING BARBED-WIRE FENCE REMOVE AND DISPOSE REMOVE AND DISPOSE BARBED-WIRE FENCE REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING WETLAND 0.022 AcREMOVEREMOVEANDDISPOSE EXISTING WETLAND 0.053 Ac REMOVE BARBED-WIRE FENCE REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING WETLAND 0.316 Ac REMOVE TO CLEAR AND GRUB LINE WOOD FRAME TEST PLOT REMOVE AND DISPOSE WOOD FRAME TEST PLOT REMOVE AND DISPOSE REMOVE AND DISPOSE WOOD FRAME TEST PLOTS REMOVE AND DISPOSE CONCRETE FOUNDATION LIGHTENING TOWER No. 1 REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING WETLAND .0125 Ac REMOVE EXISTING WETLAND PROTECT-IN-PLACE BARBED-WIRE FENCE REMOVE AND DISPOSE MONITORING WELL TMW-9 ABANDON EXISTING PROPANE CANON TO BE REMOVED BY CHEVRON REMOVE AND DISPOSE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPOSED WATER LINE REMOVE AND DISPOSE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER TANK GAUGING CABLE CUT AND CAP CRUDE-OIL LINE EXISTING WETLAND .007 Ac REMOVE REFERENCE: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007. SCALE 0 120 240 FEET LEGEND V:\ 1212_Padre- Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_ Remedial_Design\ 031_1212.001_ Reservoir_4_Demolition_Plan.dwg\ 05/13/ 14N FIGURE 35 RESERVOIR 4 (OU # 3)DEMOLITION PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE EXISTING MONITORING / SUPPLY WELL CUT/FILL LINE RIDGE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB REMOVE FENCE REMOVE FENCE EAST OF THIS POINT (SEE NOTE 5) REMOVE FENCE SOUTH OF THIS POINT (SEE NOTE 5) CLEAR AND GRUB SEE NOTE 1) RELOCATE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER AND TELECOMMUNICATION LINES TO AN AREA OUTSIDE GRADING FOOTPRINT (SEE NOTE 4) REMOVE FENCE NORTH OF THIS POINT (SEE NOTE 5) WETLANDS TO BE REMOVED SEE NOTE 3) REMOVE FENCE WEST OF THIS POINT (SEE NOTE 5) N FIGURE 36 FLOWER MOUND DEMOLITION PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIAV:\ 1212_ Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\1212. 001_ Remedial_Design\046_1212.001_Flowermound_Demolition_Plan.dwg\ 05/12/14SCALE 0 150 300 FEET NOTES: 1. CLEAR AND GRUB WITH THIS BOUNDARY. AREA WITHIN THIS BOUNDARY IS CONSIDERED THE WORK AREA FOR THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT. CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE, IN ADDITION TO VEGETATION AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL CONCRETE DEBRIS, STRUCTURES, FEATURES,MONITORING WELLS, AND HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SOIL.2. MONITORING WELLS WITHIN THE WORK AREA SHALL BE ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND WITH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN NO. 74-81.3. WETLANDS WITHIN THE CLEAR AND GRUB BOUNDARY SHALL BE PERMANENTLY REMOVED. WETLANDS OUTSIDE THE CLEAR AND GRUB LINE SHALL BE PROTECTED-IN- PLACE. THOSE WETLANDS ADJACENT TO THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS.4. THE EXISTING POWER POLES CARRY ACTIVE POWER LINES BELONGING TO PG&E, AND TELECOMMUNICATION LINES BELONGING TO AT& T OR CHARTER CABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL TEMPORARILY RELOCATE LINES OUTSIDE THE WORK AREA DURING GRADING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH PG&E AND AT&T IF RELOCATION IS NECESSARY.5. FENCE WITHIN THE CLEAR AND GRUB LINE SHALL BE REMOVED. FENCE OUTSIDE THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED-IN-PLACE. GAPS IN THE FENCE ALLOWING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY FROM OFF-SITE SHALL BE CLOSED BY NEW FENCE OUTSIDE THE WORK AREA.REFERENCE:TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS AND FEATURES PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007.X LEGEND 125 HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION -REMEDIATION REQUIRED HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION -REMEDIATION NOT REQUIRED EXISTING MONITORING /SUPPLY WELL FIRE HYDRANT LIMITS OF TANK FARM ROAD EXTENT OF SURFACE EXPRESSION EXCAVATION ASPHALTIC MATERIAL EXISTING PG&E OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL PROTECT-IN-PLACE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER CONCRETE FOUNDATION OF FORMER RESERVOIR WALL APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF GEOTEXTILE ASPHALTIC MATERIAL TMW-9 TO BE ABANDONED) REFERENCE: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007. SCALE 0 120 240 FEET V:\ 1212_Padre- Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_ Remedial_Design\032_ 1212.001_ Reservoir_4_Excavation_ and_Geotextile_Placement_Plan.dwg\ 05/12/ 14N FIGURE 37 RESERVOIR 4 (OU # 3) EXCAVATION AND GEOTEXTILE PLACEMENT PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA LEGEND TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE EXISTING MONITORING / SUPPLY WELL APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF GEOTEXTILE LIMIT OF TANK FARM ROAD LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING SANTA F E RO A D TANK FARM ROAD REPLACE FENCE 16015515014514013513013013514016016 0 1651701551 50145 140 150 1 5 5 PROVIDE STORMWATER RETENTION BASIN COLLECTOR LOOPCUTFILLCUT FILLCUT FILL CUTFILL CUTFILLCUTFILLFILL CU T CUT FILL CUTFILLCUT FILL FILLCUTFILLCUT DITCH ED- 2 DITCH ED- 4 DITCH ED- 8 DITCH ED- 7 DITCH ED- 6 DITCH ED- 1 DITCH ED- 5 DITCH ED- 10 DITCH ED- 11 DITCH ED- 12 DITCH ED- 9 DITCH ED- 3 TIE SANTA FE ROAD INTO EXISTING GROUND ELEV. 160. 00 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR- 7 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR- 9 ENERGY DISSIPATORRR- 8V:\ 1212_Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\ 1212.001_ Remedial_Design\041_1212. 001_Reservoir_4_ Cap_Grading_Plan. dwg\05/12/14SCALE 0 200 400 FEET FIGURE 38 RESERVOIR 4 (OU # 3)CAP GRADING PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA CUT/ FILL LINE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION REMEDIATION REQUIRED HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION -REMEDIATION NOT REQUIRED TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE N LEGEND REFERENCE: EXTENT OF PROPOSED TANK FARM ROAD EXPANSION EXTENT OF EXISTING TANK FARM ROAD TANK FARM ROAD HP 147.40 HP 148.50 1 4 9 1 4 8 1 4 6 1 4 5 1 4 3 1 4 2 1 4 0 145144143151 152 1501 4 7 1 50145 140 150FILL CU T CUTFILLCUTFILL CUT FILL FILLCUT FILLCUTFILLCUTDITCH ED-6 DITCH BA-1 DITCH BA-2 DITCH BA-5 DITCH BA-3 DITCH BA-4 DITCH BA-8 DITCH BA-6 DITCH BA-7 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-10 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-12 ENERGY DISSIPATOR RR-11 MW-17 PROTECT IN PLACE OR ABANDON AND REPLACE) MW-18 PROTECT IN PLACE OR ABANDON AND REPLACE) N V:\1212_ Padre-Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_ Design\045_1212. 001_BA2_Grading_Plan. dwg\05/ 12/14FIGURE 39 BORROW AREA NO. 2 GRADING PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA SCALE 0 150 300 FEET X LEGEND 125 HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION - REMEDIATION REQUIRED HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION -REMEDIATION NOT REQUIRED EXISTING MONITORING /SUPPLY WELL FENCE TREE / 10" 16" B-36 B-35 B-33 ABANDON) PG&E ELECTRICAL POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES, PROTECT-IN-PLACE SEE NOTE 4) MISC. CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, REMOVE AND DISPOSE BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION SEE NOTE 5) ABANDON EXISTING MONITORING WELL SEE NOTE 4) LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB SEE NOTE 1) PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE REMOVE AND DISPOSE SEE NOTE 2) EXISTING FENCE PROTECT-IN-PLACE 3 2 1 PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE REMOVE AND DISPOSE SEE NOTE 2) PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE REMOVE AND DISPOSE SEE NOTE 2) SLOPE SIDES 2:1 LIMIT OF EXCAVATION SEE NOTE 5) ABANDON) VEGETATION AND CLEAN SOIL STOCKPILE AREA SEE NOTE 6) TANK FARM ROAD EXISTING TRASH/RUBBLE PILE, REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING WATER LINE ABANDON-IN-PLACE CRUDE OIL LINE ABANDON-IN-PLACE EXISTING GAS LINE ABANDON-IN-PLACE EXISTING WATER LINE REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CRUDE OIL LINES REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING WATER AND FOAMITE LINES, REMOVE AND DISPOSE ABANDON) NOTES: 1. CLEAR AND GRUB WITHIN THIS BOUNDARY. CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ALL CONCRETE DEBRIS, STRUCTURES, FEATURES, MONITORING WELLS AND HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SOIL NOT NOTED IN THESE DRAWINGS. VEGETATION REMOVED AS PART OF CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE SAVED AND STOCKPILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN. 2.PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURES SHALL BE DISMANTLED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED. IMPACTED SOIL BENEATH ANY ENCLOSURE SHALL BE REMOVED AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO ENSURE THE EXISTING PG&E ELECTRICAL POWER POLES AND OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES IN AND AROUND THE EXCAVATION AREA ARE NOT DAMAGED OR DESTROYED. 4.MONITORING WELLS WITHIN THE WORK AREA SHALL BE ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN No. 74-81. 5.EXCAVATION OF THE NORTH MARSH AREA SHALL BE TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3-FEET 6-INCHES AND TO A MINIMUM EXTENT AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED GEOLOGIST OR CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL BE PRESENT AT ALL TIMES DURING EXCAVATION. EXCAVATION SIDES SHALL BE SLOPED AT A MAXIMUM OF 2:1. THE EXCAVATION LIMITS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS IS A MINIMUM EXCAVATION LIMIT AND MAY INCREASE IF CONTAMINATION IS FOUND TO EXIST BEYOND THE LIMITS INDICATED. 6. VEGETATION AND CLEAN SOIL GENERATED BY THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN THIS AREA TO BE USED AS CLEAN BACKFILL AND TO RE-VEGETATE AFTER BACKFILL. 7.UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. ACTUAL LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. 8.PORTIONS OF CRUDE OIL AND WATER LINES EXTENDING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF TANK FARM ROAD WERE REMOVED AS PART OF THE CITY'S SEWER PROJECT IN 2008. REFERENCE: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007. SCALE 0 120 240 FEET V:\ 1212_Padre- Chevron_SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_Design\ 034_1212.001_North_ Marsh_Demolition_and_ Excavation_Plan.dwg\05/12/ 14N FIGURE 41 NORTH MARSH (OU #3/AOC # 1) DEMOLITION AND EXCAVATION PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA LEGEND TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE EXISTING MONITORING / SUPPLY WELL CUT/FILL LINE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND 10" OIL LINE ABANDON IN PLACE TREE PROTECT-IN-PLACE HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION EXCAVATION LIMIT 300' VEGETATION AND CLEAN SOIL STOCKPILE AREA HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION EXCAVATION LIMIT WETLANDS TO BE RESTORED LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB 4" DIA. WATER LINE LIMIT OF RESERVOIR 3 EXCAVATION REFERENCE: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007. SCALE 0 120 240FEETV:\ 1212_ Padre-Chevron_ SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_Design\035_ 1212.001_Reservoir_3_ Demolition_and_Excavation_ Plan.dwg\05/12/14N FIGURE 42 RESERVOIR 3 ( OU #3/AOC #2) DEMOLITION AND EXCAVATION PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA LEGEND TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE CUT/FILL LINE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB MW-35ACCESSROAD CENTER OF EXCAVATION LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB 10" OIL LINE ABANDON IN PLACE TREE PROTECT-IN- PLACE 300'4" DIA. WATER LINE 135 134 WETLANDS TO BE RESTORED GRADE TO A MAXIMUM ELEVATION OF 134.00 FT.LIMIT OF RESERVOIR 3 EXCAVATION AND ANCHOR TRENCH WETLANDS TO BE RESTORED N 2285072. 87 E 5768516.42 SM- 2 SM- 3 V:\1212_Padre-Chevron_ SLOTF\ 1212. 001_Remedial_ Design\ 037_ 1212.001_Reservoir 3_Final Grading Plan. dwg\05/12/14SCALE 0 120 240 FEET N LEGEND TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE EXISTING MONITORING / SUPPLY WELL LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION REMEDIATION REQUIRED HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION - REMEDIATION NOT REQUIRED FIGURE 43 RESERVOIR 3 (OU # 3/AOC # 2)GRADING PLAN REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION EXCAVATION LIMIT 4" DIA. WATER LINE EXISTING FENCE AND NETTING REMOVE AND DISPOSE REMOVE AND DISPOSE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING RESERVOIR 2 CONCRETE WALL EXISTING PEBBLE STRUCTURE REMOVE AND DISPOSE FORMER 2" DIA. GAS LINE ABANDON-IN-PLACE FORMER 10" CRUDE-OIL LINE ABANDON-IN-PLACE FOUNDATION OF LIGHTNING TOWER No. 15 RESERVOIR 2 HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION EXCAVATION LIMIT CUT AND CAP 10" CRUDE-OIL LINE HERE FORMER 10" DIA. CRUDE-OIL LINE ABANDONED-IN-PLACE FORMER 10" DIA. CRUDE-OIL LINE REMOVE AND DISPOSE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB FORMER 8" DIA. CRUDE-OIL LINE ABANDONED-IN-PLACE 4" DIA. WATER LINE FORMER 12" DIA. CRUDE-OIL LINE ABANDONED-IN-PLACE EXISTING VALVE VAULT REMOVE AND DISPOSE CUT AND CAP 12" CRUDE-OIL LINE HERE FORMER 12" DIA. CRUDE-OIL LINE REMOVE AND DISPOSE HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION EXCAVATION LIMIT HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION EXCAVATION LIMIT REFERENCE: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PROVIDED BY EDA, INC., DATED JULY 11, 2007. SCALE 0 120 240FEETV:\ 1212_ Padre-Chevron_ SLOTF\1212.001_Remedial_ Design\036_1212. 001_Other_PPSH_Areas.dwg\ 05/12/ 14N FIGURE 45 OTHER PPSH-IMPACTED AREAS REMEDIAL ACTION PLANSAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMCSAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA SCALE 0 60 120 FEETPLANSOUTH OF RESERVOIR 5 SCALE 0 100 200 FEETPLAN WEST OF RESERVOIR 2 SCALE 0 100 200 FEETPLAN RESERVOIR 2 LEGEND TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR FENCEX 125 TREE / BRUSH LINE CUT/FILL LINE LIMIT OF CLEAR AND GRUB WETLAND - PROTECT-IN- PLACE HYDROCARBON SURFACE EXPRESSION ôóôóôóôóôóôóôóôó ôóôóôóôóôóôóôóôóôóôóôóôóôó ôóôóôó ôóôóôó ôó ôóôó ôó ôó ôóôóôóôóôó ôó ôó RESERVOIR 4 NORTHWEST AREA RESERVOIR 5 RESERVOIR 6 RESERVOIR 7 RESERVOIR 3 RESERVOIR 2 FORMER RECYCLING AREA S:\GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_Work_ Activities\1306.003_ 2013_Work_Activities\ArcMapDocuments022_1306. 003_Areas_ of_Habitat_ Impact.mxd\11/21/ 13FIGURE 46 AREASOF HABITAT IMPACT REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 0 500 1,000250 Feet Approximate Scale NOTE: CRLF = CALIFORNIA RED LEGGED FROG SOURCE: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MAPPING CONDUCTED BY RINCON CONSULTANTS INC., 2003. FIELD STUDIES PERFORMED MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2003.REFERENCE: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH BY CENTRAL COAST AERIAL MAPPING.DATED: FEBRUARY 4, 2008 EXPLANATION SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY ôó SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WALNUT HOOVER' S BUTTON CELERY PURPLE NEEDLEGRASS GRASSLAND SLO (CAMBRIA) MORNING GLORY SLO MORNING GLORY (2003 SURVEY) SLO OWL'S CLOVER SLO SERPENTINE DUDLEYA CONGDON'S TARPLANT DELINEATED WETLAND PROTECTED FAIRY SHRIMP PRESENT (32. This map is provided for convenience only to show the approximate location of the Property and is not based on a field survey. This COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DISCLOSURE REPORT contains the Commercial Natural Hazard Disclosure Report, the Commercial Tax Report and the Commercial Environmental Report. THIS REPORT PROVIDES THE STATUTORY DISCLOSURES MANDATED BY CALIFORNIA LAWS SPECIFIED HEREIN AND DELIVERY OF THIS REPORT AND THE EXECUTED STATUTORY FORM IS SUFFICIENT TO MEET THE SAFE HARBOR FOR THE SELLER AND SELLER'S AGENT. THIS REPORT ALSO CONTAINS OTHER IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES AND INFORMATION. SELLER AND SELLER'S AGENT MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBLITIES FOR CERTAIN DISCLOSURES WITHIN THEIR ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE. FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Map of Statutory Natural Hazards For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 1 of 44 NOTE:The map on the previous page may show more sites than are reported in the Environmental Risk Screening Summary" table on Page 1.The map shows all sites found within the square coverage area.The table reports only those sites found within the circular AAI standard search distance for the database listed,which covers a smaller area.Outside of that standard search distance the table reports NA"not applicable).The AAI standard search distance differs between database categories, depending upon degree of potential hazard.See the selection called Description of Databases Searched"for the actual AAI standard search distance used for each database category. SEMS NPL)Federal National Priorities List or Superfund"sites (LUST)Leaking Underground Storage Tanks SEMS)Fed.Sites investigated for poss.inclusion in the NPL (UST)Undergound Storage Tanks RCRA TSD)Treatment,Storage Disposal Sites for Haz.Materials (RCRA GEN)Potential Generator of hazardous materials Sites RCRA COR)Corrective Action Sites (SWIS)Solid Waste Landfill Facilities SEMS ARCHIVED)SEMS-Archived SLIC)Spills,Leaks,Investig.Cleanup Tribal LUST ENVIROSTOR)State EnviroStor Cleanup Sites Database Tribal UST CONTROLS)Deed Restriction Or Other Controls ERNS)Emergency Response Notification System Hist-UST)Historical Underground Storage Tanks HWIS)Hazardous Waste Information Summary AST)Aboveground Storage Tanks 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 2 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Map of Environmental Hazard Sites For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 ADDENDUM FOR ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS This Addendum pertains solely to Report No.2976335 dated Wednesday,January 05,2022(“Report Date”)for disclosure information with respect to the Property,situated in the County of SAN LUIS OBISPO,State of California,as collectively constituted by only those 6 assessor parcel numbers APN”)and geographic boundaries thereof listed below as provided to the Company on said Report Date: 076-383-001 076-383-002 076-381-021 076-382-005 076-352-061 076-352-062 Responses contained in this Report pertain only to Property as identified above and to no others pursuant to a Transaction.This Report should not to be used for,and liability shall not be applicable to,any transaction involving any fewer or any other parcels than those identified above.For liability purposes a Report should be ordered for an individual parcel should it be sold separately from other parcels in a separate transaction. This Addendum is attached hereto and made a part of Report No.2976335 as of this reference and is subject to the Terms and Conditions contained herein. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 3 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Natural Hazard Disclosure ("NHD") Statement and Acknowledgment of Receipt The transferor and his or her agent(s)or a third-party consultant disclose the following information with the knowledge that even though this is not a warranty, prospective transferees may rely on this information in deciding whether and on what terms to purchase the Property.Transferor hereby authorizes any agent(s) representing any principal(s)in this action to provide a copy of this statement to any person or entity in connection with any actual or anticipated sale of the Property. The following are representations made by the transferor and his or her agent(s)or a third-party consultant based on their knowledge and maps drawn by the State. This information is a disclosure and is not intended to be part of any contract between the transferee and the transferor.THIS REAL PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE FOLLOWING HAZARDOUS AREA(S): A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA Any type Zone A"or V")designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Yes X No Do not know and information not available from local jurisdiction AN AREA OF POTENTIAL FLOODING shown on a dam failure inundation map pursuant to Section 8589.5 of the Government Code. Yes No X Do not know and information not available from local jurisdiction A VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE pursuant to Section 51178 or 51179 of the Government Code.The owner of this Property is subject to the maintenance requirements of Section 51182 of the Government Code. Yes No X A WILDLAND AREA THAT MAY CONTAIN SUBSTANTIAL FOREST FIRE RISK AND HAZARDS pursuant to Section 4125 of the Public Resources Code.The owner of this Property is subject to the maintenance requirements of Section 4291 of the Public Resources Code.Additionally,it is not the state's responsibility to provide fire protection services to any building or structure located within the wildlands unless the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has entered into a cooperative agreement with a local agency for those purposes pursuant to Section 4142 of the Public Resources Code. Yes No X AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT ZONE pursuant to Section 2622 of the Public Resources Code. Yes No X A SEISMIC HAZARD ZONE pursuant to Section 2696 of the Public Resources Code. Yes Landslide Zone)Yes Liquefaction Zone) No Map not yet released by state X THESE HAZARDS MAY LIMIT YOUR ABILITY TO DEVELOP THE REAL PROPERTY,TO OBTAIN INSURANCE,OR TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE AFTER A DISASTER.THE MAPS ON WHICH THESE DISCLOSURES ARE BASED ESTIMATE WHERE NATURAL HAZARDS EXIST.THEY ARE NOT DEFINITIVE INDICATORS OF WHETHER OR NOT A PROPERTY WILL BE AFFECTED BY A NATURAL DISASTER.TRANSFEREE(S)AND TRANSFEROR(S)MAY WISH TO OBTAIN PROFESSIONAL ADVICE REGARDING THOSE HAZARDS AND OTHER HAZARDS THAT MAY AFFECT THE PROPERTY. Signature of Transferor(s)Date Signature of Transferor(s)Date Signature of Agent Date Signature of Agent Date X Transferor(s)and their agent(s)represent that the information herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge as of the date signed by the transferor(s) and agent(s). X Transferor(s)and their agent(s)acknowledge that they have exercised good faith in the selection of a third-party report provider as required in Civil Code Section 1103.7,and that the representations made in this Natural Hazard Disclosure Statement are based upon information provided by the independent third-party disclosure provider as a substituted disclosure pursuant to Civil Code Section 1103.4.Neither transferor(s)nor their agent(s)1)has independently verified the information contained in this statement and Report or 2)is personally aware of any errors or inaccuracies in the information contained on the statement.This statement was prepared by the provider below: Third-Party Disclosure Provider(s)FIRST AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES,INC.OPERATING THROUGH ITS FANHD DIVISION . Date 05 January 2022 Transferee represents that he or she has read and understands this document.Pursuant to Civil Code Section 1103.8,the representations in this Natural Hazard Disclosure Statement do not constitute all of the transferor's or agent's disclosure obligations in this transaction. Signature of Transferee(s)Date Signature of Transferee(s)Date TRANSFEREE(S) REPRESENTS ABOVE HE/SHE HAS RECEIVED, READ AND UNDERSTANDS THE COMPLETE FANHD DISCLOSURE REPORT DELIVERED WITH THIS SUMMARY: A. Commercial Natural Hazard Disclosure Report Commercial Tax Report Commercial Environmental Screening Report B. Additional Property-specific Statutory Disclosures:Former Military Ordnance Site,Airport Influence Area,Airport Noise,San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development District Jurisdiction in S.F.Bay counties only). C. Additional County and City Regulatory Determinations as applicable:Airports,Avalanche,Blow Sand,Coastal Zone,Dam/Levee Failure Inundation,Debris Flow,Erosion,Flood,Fault Zone,Fire,Groundwater,Landslide,Liquefaction,Methane Gas,Mines,Naturally Occurring Asbestos,Redevelopment Area,Right to Farm,Runoff Area,Seiche,Seismic Shaking,Seismic Ground Failure,Slope Stability,Soil Stability,Subsidence,TRPA,Tsunami. D. General advisories:Methamphetamine Contamination,Mold,Radon,Endangered Species Act,Abandoned Mines,Oil Gas Wells,Tsunami Maps coastal only),Non-residential Building Energy Use. E. Government Guides in Combined Booklet with Report.Refer to Booklet:Commercial Property Owner's Guide to Earthquake Safety.Government Guides are also available on the Company's Electronic Bookshelf"at http://www.disclosures.com/. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 4 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Table of Contents Map of Statutory Natural Hazards..................................................................................1 Environmental Hazard Map............................................................................................2 Multiple Parcel Detail......................................................................................................3 NHD Statement and Acknowledgment of Receipt..........................................................4 Table of Contents............................................................................................................5 Summary of Disclosure Determinations.........................................................................6-7 NHD Report....................................................................................................................8-24 Tax Report......................................................................................................................25-31 Environmental Screening Report....................................................................................32-42 Terms and Conditions.....................................................................................................43-44 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 5 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 PROPERTY DISCLOSURE SUMMARY - READ FULL REPORT Statutory NHD Determinations IN NOT IN Map N/A*Property is: NHD Report page: Flood X IN a Special Flood Hazard Area.The Property is IN a FEMA- designated Flood Zone(s)A,X. 8 Dam X NOT IN an area of potential dam inundation.8 Very High Fire Hazard Severity X NOT IN a very high fire hazard severity zone.9 Wildland Fire Area X Not in a wildland-state responsibility area.9 Fault X NOT IN an earthquake fault zone designated pursuant to the Alquist-Priolo Act. 10 Landslide X Map Not Available 10 Liquefaction X Map Not Available 10 County-level NHD Determinations IN NOT IN Map N/A*Property is: NHD Report page: Fault X NOT IN a County-designated fault zone 12 Landslide X IN an area of high or very high landslide potential 12 Liquefaction X IN an area of high liquefaction potential 12 Fire X IN an area of medium fire potential 12 Dam Inundation X NOT IN a dam inundation area 12 City-level NHD Determinations IN NOT IN Map N/A*Property is: NHD Report page: Landslide X an area where a map is not available 14 Additional Statutory Disclosures IN NOT IN Map N/A*Property is: NHD Report page: Fire Hazard Severity Zone SB 63) Moderate,High or Very High in Local Responsibility Area) X Map Not Available SB 63 fire zones not yet released by State Fire Marshal. 15 Former Military Ordnance X NOT WITHIN one mile of a formerly used ordnance site.15 Airport Influence Area X IN an airport influence area:San Luis Obispo County Regional Air 16 Airport Noise Area for 65 Decibel X IN a delineated 65 dB CNEL or greater aviation noise zone.17 General Advisories Description NHD Report page: Methamphetamine Contamination Provides an advisory that a disclosure may be required pursuant to the Methamphetamine Contaminated Property Cleanup Act of 2005". 18 Mold Provides an advisory that all prospective purchasers of residential and commercial property should thoroughly inspect the subject property for mold and sources for additional information on the origins of and the damage caused by mold. 19 Radon Provides an advisory on the risk associated with Radon gas concentrations.20 Endangered Species Provides an advisory on resources to educate the public on locales of endangered or threatened species. 20 Abandoned Mines Provides an advisory on resources to educate the public on the hazards posed by,and some of the general locales of,abandoned mines. 21 Oil and Gas Wells Provides an advisory on the potential existence of oil and gas wells and sources for additional general and/or specific information. 21 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 6 of 44 General Advisories Description NHD Report page: Electromagnetic Fields Advisory Provides an advisory about electromagnetic fields in the local environment and their assessment. 22 Tsunami Map Advisory Provides an advisory about maximum tsunami inundation maps issued for jurisdictional emergency planning. 23 Property Tax Determinations IS IS NOT Property is: Tax Report page: Mello-Roos Districts X NOT SUBJECT TO a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District.26 1915 Bond Act Districts X NOT SUBJECT TO a 1915 Bond Act District.26 PACE Contract Assessment X NOT SUBJECT TO a Property Assessed Clean Energy PACE)Contract.26 Other Direct Assessments X NOT SUBJECT TO other direct assessments.27 SRA Fire Prevention Fee X NOT SUBJECT TO the State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fee SRA Fee is suspended until 2031 by Assembly Bill 398 of 2017). 31 Environmental Screening Determinations IS IS NOT Property is: Environmental Report page: Subject Property listed in a Disclosed Database?X IS LISTED in one or more of the databases searched for this report.32 Federal National Priorities List or Superfund" sites NPL) X NOT WITHIN one mile of a NPL site.38 Corrective Action Sites RCRA COR)X NOT WITHIN one mile of a RCRA COR site.38 Federal Sites investigated for possible inclusion in the NPL SEMS) X NOT WITHIN one-half mile of a SEMS site.38 SEMS Sites That Have Been Archived SEMS- Archived) X NOT WITHIN one-half mile of a SEMS-Archived site.38 Treatment,Storage Disposal Sites for Hazardous Materials RCRA TSD) X NOT WITHIN one-half mile of a RCRA TSD site.39 Tribal UST And/Or Tribal LUST X NOT WITHIN one-half mile of a Tribal UST or Tribal LUST site.39 State EnviroStor Cleanup Sites Database ENVIROSTOR) X WITHIN one-half mile of a ENVIROSTOR site.39 State List of Spills,Leaks,Investigation Cleanup SLIC) X WITHIN one-half mile of a SLIC site.39 State List of Solid Waste Landfill Facilities SWIS) X WITHIN one-half mile of a SWIS site.40 State List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks LUST) X WITHIN one-half mile of a LUST site.40 EnviroStor Site With Deed Restriction Or Other Controls CONTROLS) X NOT WITHIN one-half mile of a CONTROLS site.40 Potential Generator of hazardous materials Sites RCRA GEN) X WITHIN one-eighth mile of a RCRA GEN site.40 Emergency Response Notification System ERNS,National Response Center) X NOT WITHIN one-eighth mile of a ERNS site.40 State List of Underground Storage Tanks UST)X NOT WITHIN one-eighth mile of a UST site.41 State List of Historical Underground Storage Tanks Hist-UST) X NOT WITHIN one-eighth mile of a Hist-UST site.41 State Hazardous Waste Information Summary HWIS) X WITHIN one-eighth mile of a HWIS site.41 State List of Aboveground Storage Tanks AST)X WITHIN one-eighth mile of a Hist-AST site.41 Determined by First American Professional Real Estate Services,Inc. For more detailed information as to the foregoing determinations, please read this entire Report. FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 7 of 44 Natural Hazard Disclosure Report Part 1. State Defined Natural Hazard Zones Statutory Natural Hazard Disclosures Section 1103 of the California Civil Code mandates the disclosure of six 6)natural hazard zones if the Property is located within any such zone.Those six statutory"hazard zones,disclosed on the Natural Hazard Disclosure Statement NHDS")on Page one of this Report,are explained below.Note that the NHDS does not provide for informing buyers if a property is only partially within any of the delineated zones or provide additional flood zone information which could be very important to the process.The following summary is intended to give buyers additional information they may need to help them in the decision-making process and to place the information in perspective. SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA DISCUSSION:Property in a Special Flood Hazard Area any type of Zone A"or V"as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA")is subject to flooding in a 100-year rainstorm."Federally connected lenders require homeowners to maintain flood insurance for buildings in these zones.A 100-year flood occurs on average once every 100 years,but may not occur in 1,000 years or may occur in successive years.According to FEMA,a home located within a SFHA has a 26%chance of suffering flood damage during the term of a 30-year mortgage.Other types of flooding,such as dam failure,are not considered in developing these zones.Flood insurance for properties in Zones B,C,D,X,X500,and X500_Levee is available but is not required. Zones A, AO, AE, AH, AR, A1-A30:Area of 100-year"flooding a 1%or greater chance of annual flooding. Zone A99:An adequate progress”determination for flood control system construction projects that,once completed,may significantly limit the area of a community that will be included in the Special Flood Hazard Area SFHA).Such projects reduce but do not eliminate,the risk of flooding to people and structures in levee-impacted”areas,and allow mandatory flood insurance to be available at a lower cost. Zones V, V1-V30:Area of 100-year"flooding in coastal shore front)areas subject to wave action. Zone B: Area of moderate flood risk.These are areas between the 100"and 500"year flood-risk levels. Zones C, D: NOT IN an area of 100-year"flooding.Area of minimal Zone C)or undetermined Zone D)flood hazard. Zones X:An area of minimal flood risk.These are areas outside the 500"year flood-risk level. Zone X500:An area of moderate flood risk.These are areas between the 100"and 500"year flood-risk levels. Zone X500_LEVEE:An area of moderate flood risk that is protected from 100-year flood"by levee and that is subject to revision to high risk Zone A)if levee is decertified by FEMA. Zone N: Area Not Included,no flood zone designation has been assigned or not participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. Notice:The Company is not always able to determine if the Property is subject to a FEMA Letter of Map Revision LOMR")or other FEMA letters of map change.If Seller is aware that the Property is subject to a LOMR or other letters of map change,the Seller shall disclose the map change and attach a copy of the FEMA letter(s)to the Report.Contact FEMA at http://msc.fema.gov for additional information. For more information about flood zones,visit: https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/NM/FEMA_FLD_HAZ_guide.pdf PUBLIC RECORD:Official Flood Insurance Rate Maps FIRM"compiled and issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA")pursuant to 42 United States Code 4001,et seq. AREA OF POTENTIAL FLOODING (DAM FAILURE) Since 1998 California law has required seller disclosure of areas of potential inundation due to sudden or total dam failure as delineated on inundation maps submitted by dam owners to the California Office of Emergency Services OES”)for review and approval;however,as of June 27,2017,the date on which Senate Bill 92 SB 92)became operative,the review and approval of inundation maps prepared by licensed civil engineers and submitted by dam owners became the statutory responsibility of the California Department of Water Resources DWR”)Division of Safety of Dams DSOD”)as required by California Water Code Section 6161.These inundation maps are a component of emergency action plans submitted by dam owners to comply with statutory requirements set forth under the California Water Code for extremely high,high,and significant hazard dams and their critical appurtenant structures.Inundation maps are not required by the California Water Code for low hazard dams.SB 92 further requires dam owners to update the emergency action plan,including an inundation map,no less frequently than every 10 years or sooner. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 8 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 To date DWR has yet to review,approve,and make publicly available inundation maps and data for many facilities with inundation areas that are subject to disclosure requirements.Inundation maps will continue to be posted and updated maps will replace outdated maps as they are approved by DSOD.In the absence of DSOD-approved data,inundation maps previously approved by the OES will be used by the Company to facilitate compliance with specified statutory real estate transfer disclosure requirements. These include inundation maps for federally owned dams over which DSOD has no jurisdictional authority and for which inundation maps are not available from DSOD.These dams include,among others,Folsom Dam,Isabella Dam,Hansen Dam, Prado Dam,and Seven Oaks Reservoir owned by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers)as well as Monticello Dam,New Melones Dam,and Shasta Dam owned by the U.S.Bureau of Reclamation).The Company may also use OES-approved maps should the mapped inundation area for a given facility be greater than that depicted on a DSOD-approved map. PUBLIC RECORD: (1)Official dam inundation maps made publicly available prior to June 27,2017 by the State of California Office of Emergency Services OES")pursuant to California Government Code 8589.5;2)Official inundation boundary digital data made publicly available since June 28,2017 by the State of California Department of Water Resources DWR)pursuant to California Water Code 6161.DWR states that its inundation boundary data typically includes flooding depths greater than one foot but some information may be redacted for security purposes. VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE (VHFHSZ) DISCUSSION:VHFHSZs can be defined by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Calfire")as well as by local fire authorities within Local Responsibility Areas"where fire suppression is the responsibility of a local fire department. Properties located within VHFHS Zones may have a higher risk for fire damage and,therefore,may be subject to i)additional construction requirements such as a Class A"roof for new construction or replacement of existing roofs;and ii)additional maintenance responsibilities such as adequate vegetation clearance near the structure,spark screens on chimneys and stovepipes,leaf removal from roofs,and other basic fire-safety practices.Contact the local fire department for a complete list of requirements and exceptions. PUBLIC RECORD:Maps issued by Calfire pursuant to California Government Code 51178 recommending VHFHSZs to be adopted by the local jurisdiction within its Local Responsibility Area,or VHFHSZs adopted by the local jurisdiction within the statutory 120-day period defined in California Government Code 51179. WILDLAND FIRE AREA (STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREA) DISCUSSION: The State Board of Forestry classifies all lands within the State of California based on various factors such as ground cover,beneficial use of water from watersheds,probable damage from erosion,and fire risks.Fire prevention and suppression in all areas which are not within a Wildland State Responsibility Area WSRA")is primarily the responsibility of the local or federal agencies,as applicable. For property located within a WSRA,please note that 1)there may be substantial forest fire risks and hazards;2)except for property located within a county which has assumed responsibility for prevention and suppression of all fires,it is NOT the state's responsibility to provide fire protection services to any building or structure located within a WSRA unless the Department has entered into a cooperative agreement with a local agency;and 3)the property owner may be is subject to i)additional construction requirements such as a Class A"roof for new construction or replacement of existing roofs;and ii)additional maintenance responsibilities such as adequate vegetation clearance near the structure,spark screens on chimneys and stovepipes,leaf removal from roofs,and other basic fire-safety practices. The existence of local agreements for fire service is not available in the Public Record and,therefore,is not included in this disclosure.For very isolated properties with no local fire services or only seasonal fire services there may be significant fire risk.If the Property is located within a WSRA,please contact the local fire department for more detailed information. PUBLIC RECORD:Official maps issued by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Calfire")pursuant to California Public Resources Code 4125. SRA Fire Prevention Benefit Fee Advisory In 2011,the California Legislature and Governor enacted a Fire Prevention Fee"on habitable structures in the State's wildland fire responsibility area.The yearly fee,levied on property owners,paid for various activities to prevent and suppress wildfires in the SRA,and was most recently at the rate of 152.33 per habitable structure on the property. Effective July 1, 2017, as authorized by Assembly Bill 398 and signed by the Governor, that fire prevention fee is suspended until 2031. For more information,please refer to Part 6.State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fee"in the FANHD Property Tax Report. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 9 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 EARTHQUAKE FAULT ZONE DISCUSSION:Earthquake Fault Zones are delineated and adopted by California as part of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Act of 1972.Property in an Earthquake Fault Zone EF Zone")does not necessarily have a fault trace existing on the site. EF Zones are areas or bands delineated on both sides of known active earthquake faults.EF Zones vary in width but average one-quarter 1/4)mile in width with the typical"zone boundaries set back approximately 660 feet on either side of the fault trace. The potential for fault rupture"damage ground cracking along the fault trace)is relatively high only if a structure is located directly on a fault trace.If a structure is not on a fault trace,shaking will be the primary effect of an earthquake.During a major earthquake,shaking will be strong in the vicinity of the fault and may be strong at some distance from the fault depending on soil and bedrock conditions.It is generally accepted that properly constructed wood-frame houses are resistant to shaking damage. PUBLIC RECORD:Official earthquake fault zone or special study zone maps approved by the State Geologist and issued by the California Department of Conservation,California Geological Survey pursuant to California Public Resources Code 2622. SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING ACT ZONE DISCUSSION:Official Seismic Hazard Zone SH Zone")maps delineate Areas of Potential Liquefaction and Areas of Earthquake-Induced Landsliding.A property that lies partially or entirely within a designated SH Zone may be subject to requirements for site-specific geologic studies and mitigation before any new or additional construction may take place. Earthquake-Induced Landslide Hazard Zones are areas where the potential for earthquake-induced landslides is relatively high. Areas most susceptible to these landslides are steep slopes in poorly cemented or highly fractured rocks,areas underlain by loose,weak soils,and areas on or adjacent to existing landslide deposits.The CGS cautions these maps do not capture all potential earthquake-induced landslide hazards and that earthquake-induced ground failures are not addressed by these maps. Furthermore,no effort has been made to map potential run-out areas of triggered landslides.It is possible that such run-out areas may extend beyond the zone boundaries.An earthquake capable of causing liquefaction or triggering a landslide may not uniformly affect all areas within a SH Zone. Liquefaction Hazard Zones are areas where there is a potential for,or an historic occurrence of liquefaction.Liquefaction is a soil phenomenon that can occur when loose,water saturated granular sediment within 40 feet of the ground surface,are shaken in a significant earthquake.The soil temporarily becomes liquid-like and structures may settle unevenly.The Public Record is intended to identify areas with a relatively high potential for liquefaction but not to predict the amount or direction of liquefaction- related ground displacement,nor the amount of damage caused by liquefaction.The many factors that control ground failure resulting from liquefaction must be evaluated on a site specific basis. PUBLIC RECORD: Official seismic hazard maps or digital data thereof approved by the State Geologist and issued by the California Department of Conservation,California Geological Survey pursuant to California Public Resources Code 2696. STATUTORY NATURAL HAZARD DISCLOSURE REPORTING STANDARD:IN"shall be reported if any portion of the Property is located within any of the above zones as delineated in the Public Record.NOT IN"shall be reported if no portion of the Property is located within any of the above zones as delineated in the Public Record.Map Not Available shall be reported in areas not yet evaluated by the governing agency according to the Public Record.Please note that MAP NOT AVAILABLE"will be applicable to most portions of the state.Official Seismic Hazard Zone SH Zone")maps delineate Areas of Potential Liquefaction and Areas of Earthquake-Induced Landsliding. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 10 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 2. County and City Defined Natural Hazard Zones HAZARD MAPS IN THE LOCAL GENERAL PLAN General Plan regulates property development.There are currently over 530 incorporated cities and counties in California.The state Government Code Sections 65000 et seq.)requires each of those jurisdictions to adopt a comprehensive,long-term General Plan"for its physical development.That General Plan regulates land uses within the local jurisdiction in order to protect the public from hazards in the environment and conserve local natural resources.The General Plan is the official city or county policy regarding the location of housing,business,industry,roads,parks,and other land uses. Municipal hazard zones can affect the cost of ownership.Each county and city adopts its own distinct General Plan according to that jurisdiction's unique vegetation,landscape,terrain,and other geographic and geologic conditions.The Safety Element"or Seismic Safety Element)of that General Plan identifies the constraints of earthquake fault,landslide,flood,fire and other natural hazards on local land use,and it delineates hazard zones within which private property improvements may be regulated through the building-permit approval process,which can affect the future cost of ownership.Those locally regulated hazard zones are in addition to the federal and state defined hazard zones associated with statutory disclosures in the preceding section. City and/or County natural hazard zones explained below.Unless otherwise specified,only those officially adopted Safety Element or Seismic Safety Element maps or digital data thereof)which are publicly available,are of a scale,resolution,and quality that readily enable parcel-specific hazard determinations,and are consistent in character with those statutory federal or state disclosures will be considered for eligible for use as the basis for county-or city-level disclosures set forth in this Report. Please also note: If an officially adopted Safety Element or Seismic Safety Element map relies on data which is redundant of that used for state- level disclosures,this Report will indicate so and advise Report recipients to refer to the state-level hazard discussion section for more information.• If an officially adopted Safety Element or Seismic Safety Element cites underlying maps created by another agency,those maps may be regarded as incorporated by reference and may be used as the basis for parcel-specific determinations if those maps meet the criteria set forth in this section.• Because county-and city-level maps are developed independently and do not necessarily define or delineate a given hazard the same way,the boundaries for the same"hazard may be different. If one or more maps contained in the Safety Element and/or Seismic Safety Element of an officially adopted General Plan are used as the basis for local disclosure,those maps will appear under the Public Record(s)Searched"for that county or city. REPORTING STANDARDS A good faith effort has been made to disclose all hazard features on pertinent Safety Element and Seismic Safety Element maps with well-defined boundaries;however,those hazards with boundaries that are not delineated will be deemed not suitable for parcel-specific hazard determinations.Some map features,such as lines drawn to represent the location of a fault trace,may be buffered to create a zone to facilitate disclosure.Those map features which can not be readily distinguished from those representing hazards may be included to prevent an omission of a hazard feature.If the width of a hazard zone boundary is in question,IN"will be reported if that boundary impacts any portion of a property.Further explanations concerning specific map features peculiar to a given county or city will appear under the Reporting Standards"for that jurisdiction. PUBLIC RECORDS VS. ON-SITE EVALUATIONS Mapped hazard zones represent evaluations of generalized hazard information.Any specific site within a mapped zone could be at less or more relative risk than is indicated by the zone designation.A site-specific evaluation conducted by a geotechnical consultant or other qualified professional may provide more detailed and definitive information about the Property and any conditions which may or do affect it. PROPERTY USE AND PERMITTING No maps beyond those identified as Public Record(s)"have been consulted for the purpose of these local disclosures.These disclosures are intended solely to make Report recipient(s)aware of the presence of mapped hazards.For this reason and because local authorities may use on these or additional maps or data differently to determine property-specific land use and permitting approvals Report recipients are advised to contact the appropriate local agency,usually Community Development, Planning,and/or Building,prior to the transaction to ascertain if these or any other conditions or related regulations may impact the Property use or improvement. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 11 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GEOLOGIC ZONES DISCUSSION PUBLIC RECORD(S) SEARCHED:The following Public Records,contained in the Safety Element of the General Plan as adopted by the County Board of Supervisors in 1999,are utilized for those County-level disclosures below:Fault Hazards," Liquefaction Hazards,"Landslide Hazards,"Fire Hazards,"and Dam Inundation Hazards"maps prepared by the Department of Planning and Building and digitized at Cal Poly. FAULT HAZARDS Fault rupture,as defined in the Public Record,refers to displacement of the ground surface along a fault trace.Rupture of the ground surface along a fault trace typically occurs during earthquakes of approximately magnitude 5 or greater.In addition to the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones delineated by the California Geological Survey,the Public Record also identifies the location of county-designated active fault those showing evidence of movement within the past 11,000 years),potentially active those showing evidence of movement between 2 million to 11,000 years ago),and inactive fault those showing no evidence of movement over the past 2 million years). Reporting Standards:If any portion of the Property is within one-eighth of one mile 660 feet)of a fault trace as digitized by Cal Poly,WITHIN"shall be reported. LIQUEFACTION HAZARDS Liquefaction is a sudden loss of soil strength due to a rapid increase in soil pore water pressures resulting from seismic ground shaking.The areas of the County most susceptible to the effects of liquefaction are those areas underlain by young, poorly consolidated,saturated granular alluvial sediments.These soil conditions are most frequently found in areas underlain by recent river and flood plain deposits.In order for liquefaction to occur,three general geotechnical characteristics should be present:1)ground water should be present within the potentially liquefiable zone;2)the potentially liquefiable zone should be granular and meet a specific range in grain-size distribution;and 3)the potentially liquefiable zone should be of relatively low density.Portions of the County have been identified as high,moderate,or low potential for liquefaction. Reporting Standards:If any portion of the Property is within a Liquefaction Hazard as delineated in the Public Record,only the most severe hazard area High,Moderate,or Low)in which the Property is situated shall be reported.Map Not Available" shall be reported if the Property is in an area that has not been mapped. LANDSLIDE HAZARDS The Safety Element states that landslides and slope instability can occur as a result of wet weather,weak soils,improper grading,improper drainage,steep slopes,adverse geologic structure,earthquakes,or a combination of these factors. Landslides can result in damage to property and cause buildings to become unsafe either due to distress or collapse during sudden or gradual slope movement.Structures constructed in steep terrain,possibly on stable ground,may also experience landslide hazards if they are sited in the path of potential mud flows or rockfall hazards.The County acknowledges that areas of known landslide activity are generally not suitable for residential development.The County will avoid development in areas of known slope instability or high landslide risk when possible.Expansion will not be permitted to existing structures in areas of known landslide activity except when it will reduce the potential for loss of life and property.The County has categorized Landslide Potential areas as follows: Very High:Areas of existing mapped landslides• High Potential:Areas of potentially unstable rocks• Moderate Potential:Areas know to have localized areas of instability• Low Potential:Areas with slope gradient less than 20% Reporting Standards:If any portion of the Property is within a Landslide Hazard as delineated in the Public Record,only the most severe potential Very High,High,Moderate,or Low)in which the Property is situated shall be reported.Map Not Available"shall be reported if the Property is in an area that has not been mapped. DAM INUNDATION ZONES Dam inundation is the flooding of lands due to release of impounded water resulting from the failure or overtopping of a dam. Even though there are several large publicly owned dams and a number of smaller privately owned dams in the County,the Safety Element states that the probability of dam inundation is highly unlikely.Were a dam to fail,the type of failure a slow breach versus a sudden failure would also affect the downstream impact. Reporting Standards: If any portion of the Property is within a dam inundation area as delineated in the Public Record,IN" shall be reported. FIRE HAZARD ZONES Any given area of the County is situated in at least one designated Fire Hazard Zone.Very High"and High"Zones are concentrated mainly in the Santa Lucia Mountains,which extend from Monterey County to the north,to Santa Barbara County to the south.These two Zones exhibit the combination of vegetative fuel,topography,and human proximity that contribute to an extreme fire hazard potential.Medium"Hazard Zones,which are more geographically disbursed,are areas of reduced probability of damaging fire but could nevertheless experience a damaging fire. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 12 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Reporting Standards:If any portion of the Property is within a Fire Hazard Zone as delineated in the Public Record,only the most severe potential Very High,High,or Moderate)in which the Property is situated shall be reported. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 13 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO GEOLOGIC DISCUSSION PUBLIC RECORD(S) SEARCHED:The following Public Record(s),incorporated into the Safety Element of the City of San Luis Obispo General Plan as officially adopted in 2000,is used for the city-level disclosure(s)below:Figure 5:Ground Shaking Landslide Hazards". LANDSLIDE Slope instability can occur as a gradual spreading of soil,a relatively sudden slippage,a rockfall,or in other forms.Causes include steep slopes,inherently weak soils,saturated soils,and earthquakes.Improper grading and man made drainage can be contributing factors.Slope instability may result in gradual or sudden damage to buildings,roads,and utility lines.Sudden movement can be a threat to lives through immediate injury or suffocation,or loss of access.In the late 1990's,rainsaturated soil moved above houses on the Santa Lucia foothills.Much of the development in San Luis Obispo is in valleys,where there is low potential for slope instability.However,the city contains extensive hillsides.Several are underlain by the rocks of the Franciscan group,which is a source of significant slope instability.The actual risk of slope instability needs to be identified by investigation of specific sites,including subsurface sampling,by qualified professionals.The building code requires site- specific investigations and design proposals by qualified professionals in areas that are susceptible to slope instability and landslides. Reporting Standards:IN"shall be reported if any portion of the Property is within an area of High landslide potential"within the City Limits as delineated in the City's Public Record Figure 5:Ground Shaking Landslide Hazards").NOT IN"shall be reported if any portion of the Property is within an area of High landslide potential"within the City Limits as delineated in the City's Public Record.Important Note:The reader should note that in the City's Public Record,the boundaries of areas mapped as Moderate landslide potential"conform to areas in the County's Public Record that are mapped as High" landslide hazard.Also,areas mapped in the City's Public Record as High landslide potential"are mapped in the County's Public Record as Very High"landslide hazard in some instances,and Low"landslide hazard in others.For more information please refer to landslide hazards in the County-level geologic discussion in the preceding section of this Report OTHER HAZARDS The 100-year flood area"and 500-year flood area"areas depicted in Figure 1:Flood Hazards"have been superseded by newer FEMA flood insurance rate maps and data.For the most current FEMA flood information please refer to the state-level discussion and disclosure of Special Flood Hazard Area in the preceding section of this Report.Figure 3:Earthquake Faults Local Area"and Figure 4:Earthquake Faults Regional Area"are redundant of state-and county-level data.For more information please refer to the state-level Earthquake Fault Zone and county-level geologic discussion in the preceding section of this Report.The areas of liquefaction potential depicted in Figure 5:Ground Shaking Landslide Hazards"are redundant of those areas of potential liquefaction at the county-level.For more information please refer to the county-level geologic discussion in the preceding section of this Report.General Plan Amendment Note:In 2012 the City amended the Fire component of the General Plan by ordinance,replacing those wildland fire hazards within the City limits as previously depicted in Figure 2:Wildland Fire Hazard"with Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Area of Responsibility"that are redundant of those subject to statutory disclosure.For more information please refer to the state-level Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone section in the preceding section of this Report.Fire hazard severity zones within State Areas of Responsibility that are not within the City limits are not reported. END OF LOCAL AREA DISCLOSURES AND DISCUSSIONS SECTION 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 14 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 3. Additional Property Specific Disclosures Senate Bill 63 (SB 63) Advisory California Senate Bill 63 SB 63”),approved by the Governor on September 28,2021 effective January 1,2022),requires among other things that the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Director”)shall identify areas in the State as Moderate,”High,”and Very High”Fire Hazard Severity Zones Section 51178 of the Government Code as amended).SB 63 further requires that a local agency shall make the information available for public review and comment Section 51178.5 of the Government Code as amended).The Director has not yet released those Fire Hazard Severity Zone FHSZ)maps for local areas where counties and cities have fire protection responsibility the Local Responsibility Area”). SB 63 does not itself create a new real estate disclosure.However,a prior law that still controls,Assembly Bill 38 AB 38”), created certain disclosure and vegetation management defensible space)obligations for real property subject to AB 38 that is located in a High or a Very High FHSZ as identified by the Director or as required by a local vegetation management ordinance. Effective January 1,2022,SB 63 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify High and Moderate FHSZs in the Local Responsibility Area in addition to a Very High FHSZ the State already may have identified.Currently,there legally is no High Fire Hazard Severity Zone within the Local Responsibility Area,”according to the Office of the State Fire Marshal. Therefore,when the Director releases the new SB 63 FHSZ maps,the obligations under AB 38 will apply to the Very High and the High FHSZ in the Local Responsibility Area.At that time,disclosure reports issued by FANHD will update the Fire Hazard Severity Zone SB 63)”determination from Map Not Available”to indicate whether a Property is IN”a FHSZ as identified by the State Fire Marshal,along with the most severe fire hazard severity level that affects the Property.In addition,the AB 38 disclosure will likewise be updated to include both the Very High and and the High FHSZ in the Local Responsibility Area. FANHD Reports will continue to include the current NHD Statement”the one-page statutory form at the front of the report)as specified under California Civil Code 1103.2,until such time that the Legislature officially amends that form with respect to the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone”or any other listed disclosure. FORMER MILITARY ORDNANCE SITE DISCLOSURE DISCUSSION:Former Military Ordnance FUD)sites can include sites with common industrial waste such as fuels),ordnance or other warfare materiel,unsafe structures to be demolished,or debris for removal.California Civil Code Section 1102 requires disclosure of those sites containing unexploded ordnance.Military ordnance"is any kind of munitions,explosive device/material or chemical agent used in military weapons.Unexploded ordnance are munitions that did not detonate.NOTE:MOST FUD sites do not contain unexploded ordnance.Only those FUD sites that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers USACE)has identified to contain Military Ordnance or have mitigation projects planned for them are disclosed in this Report.Additional sites may be added as military installations are released under the Federal Base Realignment and Closure BRAC)Act.Active military sites are NOT included on the FUD site list. PUBLIC RECORD:Data contained in Inventory Project Reports,Archives Search Reports,and related materials produced for, and made publicly available in conjunction with,the Defense Environmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers.Sites for which no map has been made publicly available shall not be disclosed. REPORTING STANDARD:If one or more facility identified in the Public Record is situated within a one 1)mile radius of the Property,WITHIN"shall be reported.The name of that facility or facilities shall also be reported. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 15 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA DISCLOSURE DISCUSSION: If any portion of the Property is in either an officially designated airport influence area"AIA")or a two mile radius of a qualifying facility for which an AIA has not yet been officially designated,the following Notice is required: NOTICE OF AIRPORT IN VICINITY If this property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, as identified in the determination section of this Report, within what is known as an airport influence area…the property may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. In that case, you may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any, are associated with the property before you complete your purchase and determine whether they are acceptable (California Civil Code, Section 1103.4). Certain airports are not disclosed in this Report.FANHD has made a good faith effort to identify the airports covered under Section 1102.6a.Sources consulted include official land use maps and/or digital data made available by a governing Airport Land Use Commission ALUC)or other designated government body.Most facilities for which an Airport Influence Area has been designated are included on the California Airports List"maintained by the California Department of Transportation's Division of Aeronautics.Not disclosed in this Report are public use airports that are not in the California Airports List",airports that are physically located outside California,heliports and seaplane bases that do not have regularly scheduled commercial service,and private airports or military air facilities unless specifically identified in the California Airports List".If the seller has actual knowledge of an airport in the vicinity of the subject property that is not disclosed in this Report, and that is material to the transaction, the seller should disclose this actual knowledge in writing to the buyer. Most facilities for which an Airport Influence Area has been designated are included on the California Airports List"maintained by the California Department of Transportation's Division of Aeronautics.The inclusion of military and private airports varies by County,and heliports and seaplane bases are not included,therefore,airports in these categories may or may not be included in this disclosure. NOTE:Proximity to an airport does not necessarily mean that the property is exposed to significant aviation noise levels. Alternatively,there may be properties exposed to aviation noise that are greater than two miles from an airport.Factors that affect the level of aviation noise include weather,aircraft type and size,frequency of aircraft operations,airport layout,flight patterns or nighttime operations.Buyer should be aware that aviation noise levels can vary seasonally or change if airport usage changes. PUBLIC RECORD:Based on officially adopted land use maps and/or digital data made publicly available by the governing ALUC or other designated government body.If the ALUC or other designated government body has not made publicly available a current officially adopted airport influence area map,then California law states that a written disclosure of an airport within two 2)statute miles shall be deemed to satisfy any city or county requirements for the disclosure of airports in connection with transfers of real property." REPORTING STANDARD:IN"shall be reported along with the facility name(s)and the Notice of Airport in Vicinity"if any portion of the Property is situated within either a)an Airport Influence Area as designated on officially adopted maps or digital data or b) a two 2)mile radius of a qualifying facility for which an official Airport Influence Area map or digital data has not been made publicly available by the ALUC or other designated governing body.NOT IN"shall be reported if no portion of the Property is within either area. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 16 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 AIRPORT NOISE DISCLOSURE DISCUSSION:California Civil Code 1102.17 requires the seller(s)of residential real property who has/have actual knowledge that the property in the transaction is affected by airport use must give written notice of that knowledge,as soon as practicable, before transfer of title. Under the Federal Aviation Administration's Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Program Part 150,certain 65 decibel dB) Community Noise Equivalent Level CNEL)contour maps have been produced for some airports.Not all airports have produced noise exposure maps.A property may be near or at some distance from an airport and not be within a delineated noise exposure area,but still experience aviation noise.Unless 65dB CNEL contour maps are published,helipads and military sites are not included in this section of the Report. The Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Program is voluntary and not all airports have elected to participate.Furthermore,not all property in the vicinity of an airport is exposed to 65dB CNEL or greater average aviation noise levels.Conversely a property may be at some distance from an airport and still experience aviation noise.Buyer should be aware that aviation noise levels can vary seasonally or change if airport usage changes after a map is published or after the Report Date.FANHD uses the most seasonally conservative noise exposures provided. Federal funding may be available to help airports implement noise reduction programs.Such programs vary and may include purchasing properties,rezoning,and insulating homes for sound within 65dB areas delineated on CNEL maps.Airport owners have also cooperated by imposing airport use restrictions that include curfews,modifying flight paths,and aircraft limitations. PUBLIC RECORD:Certain 65 decibel dB)Community Noise Equivalent Level CNEL)contour maps produced under the Federal Aviation Administration's Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Program Part 150. REPORTING STANDARD:IN"shall be reported if any portion of the Property is situated within a 65 decibel Community Noise Equivalent Level contour identified in the Public Record.NOT IN"shall be reported if no portion of the Property is situated within a 65 decibel Community Noise Equivalent Level contour identified in the Public Record. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 17 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 4. General Advisories METHAMPHETAMINE CONTAMINATED PROPERTY DISCLOSURE ADVISORY DISCUSSION:According to the Methamphetamine Contaminated Property Cleanup Act of 2005"a property owner must disclose in writing to a prospective buyer if local health officials have issued an order prohibiting the use or occupancy of a property contaminated by meth lab activity.The owner must also give a copy of the pending order to the buyer to acknowledge receipt in writing.Failure to comply with these requirements may subject an owner to,among other things,a civil penalty up to 5,000. Aside from disclosure requirements,this new law also sets forth procedures for local authorities to deal with meth-contaminated properties,including the filing of a lien against a property until the owner cleans up the contamination or pays for the cleanup costs. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 18 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 MOLD ADVISORY DISCUSSION:The Buyer is hereby advised that naturally occurring molds may exist both inside and outside of any home and may not be visible to casual inspection.Persons exposed to extensive mold levels can become sensitized and develop allergies to the mold or other health problems.Extensive mold growth can damage a structure and its contents.All prospective purchasers of residential and commercial property are advised to thoroughly inspect the Property for mold.Be sure to inspect the Property inside and out for sources of excess moisture,current water leaks and evidence of past water damage. As part of a buyer's physical inspection of the condition of a property,the buyer should consider engaging an appropriate and qualified professional to inspect and test for the presence of harmful molds and to advise the buyer of any potential risk and options available.This advisory is not a disclosure of whether harmful mold conditions exist at a property or not.No testing or inspections of any kind have been performed by The Company.Any use of this form is acknowledgement and acceptance that The Company does not disclose,warrant or indemnify mold conditions at a property in any way and is not responsible in any way for mold conditions that may exist.Information is available from the California Department of Health Services Indoor Air Quality Section fact sheet entitled,Mold in My Home:What Do I Do?"The fact sheet is available at https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/CDPH%20Document%20Library/MMIMH_050619_ADA.pdf or by calling 510)620-3620. The Toxic Mold Protection Act of 2001 requires that information be developed regarding the potential issues surrounding naturally occurring molds within a home.Information was written by environmental authorities for inclusion in the Residential Environmental Hazards: A Guide for Homeowners, Buyers, Landlords and Tenants booklet developed by the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Health Services.It is found in Chapter VII of that booklet,and includes references to sources for additional information. For local assistance, contact your county or city Department of Health, Housing, or Environmental Health. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 19 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 RADON ADVISORY DISCUSSION:For its Radon Advisory,FANHD uses the updated assessment of radon exposure published in 1999 by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LBNL)and Columbia University,under support from the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency EPA),the National Science Foundation,and the US Department of Energy published online at http://www2.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/radon-risk-website.html).Based on this recent assessment,FANHD radon advisory is as follows: All of California's 58 counties have a predicted median annual-average living-area concentration of radon below 2.0 pCi/L picocuries per liter of indoor air) -- which is well below the EPA's guideline level of 4 pCi/L and equivalent to the lowest hazard zone (Zone 3) on the 1993 EPA Map of Radon Zones. The median concentration"means that half of the homes in a county are expected to be below this value and half to be above it. All houses contain some radon,and a few houses will contain much more than the median concentration.The only way to accurately assess long-term exposure to radon in a specific house is through long-term testing (sampling the indoor air for a year or more). The EPA recommends that all homes be tested for radon.Columbia University's Radon Project"website offers help to homeowners in assessing the cost vs.benefit of testing a specific house for radon or modifying it for radon reduction see http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~radon/). NOTE:FANHD does not use the EPA's 1993 map for advisory purposes because that map shows short-term"radon exposure averaged by county.It was based on screening measurements"that were intentionally designed to sample the worst-case conditions for indoor air in US homes--using spot checks sampling for just a few days),in the poorest air quality with sealed doors and windows),at the worst time of the year winter),in the worst part of the house the basement,if one was available). These short-term,winter,basement measurements are both biased and variable compared to long-term radon concentrations averaged over a year)in the living area of a house.Long-term concentrations are a more accurate way to judge the long-term health risk from radon.For the above reasons,the EPA expressly disclaims the use of its 1993 map for determining whether any house should be tested for radon,and authorizes no other use of its map for property-specific purposes.For additional information about EPA guidelines and radon testing,see Chapter VII--Radon",in the California Department of Real Estate's Residential Environmental Hazards: A Guide for Homeowners, Homebuyers, Landlords and Tenants. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ADVISORY DISCUSSION:The Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 ESA"),as amended,requires that plant and animal species identified and classified listed")by the Federal government as threatened"or endangered"be protected under U.S.law.Areas of habitat considered essential to the conservation of a listed species may be designated as critical habitat"and may require special management considerations or protection.All threatened and endangered species even if critical habitat is not designated for them are equally afforded the full range of protections available under the ESA. In California alone,over 300 species of plants and animals have been designated under the ESA as threatened or endangered, and over 80 species have critical habitats designated for them.Most California counties are host to a dozen or more protected species and,in many cases,10 or more species have designated critical habitats within a county. ADVISORY:An awareness of threatened and endangered species and/or critical habitats is not reasonably expected to be within the actual knowledge of a seller. No federal or state law or regulation requires a seller or seller's agent to disclose threatened or endangered species or critical habitats,or to otherwise investigate their possible existence on real property.Therefore,Buyer is advised that,prior to purchasing a vacant land parcel or other real property,Buyer should consider investigating the existence of threatened or endangered species,or designated critical habitats,on or in the vicinity of the Property which could affect the use of the Property or the success of any proposed re)development. FOR MORE INFORMATION:Complete and current information about the threatened and endangered species in California that are Federally listed in each county including all critical habitats designated there is available on the website of the U.S.Fish Wildlife Service,the Federal authority which has enforcement responsibility for the ESA. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Endangered Species Database (TESS) http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/ 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 20 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 ABANDONED MINES ADVISORY DISCUSSION:According to the California Department of Conservation,Office of Mine Reclamation,since the Gold Rush of 1849, tens of thousands of mines have been dug in California.Many were abandoned when they became unproductive or unprofitable. The result is that California's landscape contains many thousands of abandoned mines,which can pose health,safety,or environmental hazards on and around the mine property.Mines can present serious physical safety hazards,such as open shafts or adits mine tunnel),and they may create the potential to contaminate surface water,groundwater,or air quality.Some abandoned mines are such massive problems as to earn a spot on the Federal Superfund environmental hazard list. No California law requires the disclosure of abandoned mines in a real estate transaction,unless the existence of an abandoned mine is within the actual knowledge of the Seller and is deemed to be a fact material to the transaction. The Office of Mine Reclamation OMR)and the U.S.Geological Survey maintain a database of abandoned mines however,it is known to be incomplete and based on maps that are often decades out of date.Many mines are not mapped because they are on private land.The OMR warns that,Many old and abandoned mines are not recorded in electronic databases, and when they are, the information may not be detailed enough to accurately define, differentiate or locate the mine feature, such as a potentially hazardous vertical shaft or horizontal adit or mine waste." (See reference below.) Accordingly, this Report does not contain an abandoned mines disclosure from any government database or map or any other source, in order to protect the seller from liability for non-disclosure of unrecorded abandoned mines. Parties concerned about the possible existence or impact of abandoned mines in the vicinity of the Property are advised to retain a State-licensed geotechnical consultant to study the site and issue a report.Other sources of information include,but are not limited to,the State Office of Mine Reclamation at 916)323-9198 website:http://www.conservation.ca.gov/OMR),and the Engineering,Planning or Building Departments in the subject City and County. FOR MORE INFORMATION:For more information visit the State Office of Mine Reclamation's website at: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/omr/abandoned_mine_lands/Pages/index.aspx OIL & GAS WELL ADVISORY California is currently ranked fourth in the nation among oil producing states.Surface oil production is concentrated mainly in the Los Angeles Basin and Kern County,and in districts elsewhere in the state.In recent decades,real estate development has rapidly encroached into areas where oil production has occurred.Because the state's oil production has been in decline since the 1980's,thousands of oil and gas wells have been shut down or abandoned,and many of those wells are in areas where residential neighborhoods now exist. According to the California Department of Conservation DOC"),to date,about 230,000 oil and gas wells have been drilled in California and around 105,000 are still in use.The majority of remaining wells have been sealed capped")under the supervision of the DOC's Geologic Energy Management Division CalGEM).A smaller number have been abandoned and have no known responsible operator these are called orphan"wells.The state has a special fund that pays the cost of safely capping orphan wells,however,that program is limited in its scope and progress. Buyer should be aware that, while the DOC database is the most comprehensive source available for California oil and gas well information, the DOC makes no warranties that the database is absolutely complete, or that reported well locations are known with absolute accuracy. For More Information For a search of the state's databases of oil and gas wells and sites of known environmental contamination on or near the Property, please obtain the FANHD Residential Environmental Report.For general information,visit the California Department of Conservation,Geologic Energy Management Division CalGEM)at https://www.conservation.ca.gov/CalGEM/. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 21 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (“EMF”) ADVISORY According to the National Cancer Institute NCI”)a 1979 study pointed to a possible association between living near electric power lines and childhood leukemia.More recent studies have not found an association or have found one only for those children who lived in homes with very high levels of magnetic fields present in few residences.The NCI also notes that a majority of epidemiological studies have also shown no relationship between breast cancer in women and exposure to extremely low frequency EMFs ELF-EMF”s)in the home,although a few individual studies have suggested an association;only one reported results that were statistically significant.Sources of extremely low frequency ELF-EMF include power lines,electrical wiring,and electrical appliances such as shavers,hair dryers,and electric blankets.For more information please visit the NCI Electromagnetic Fields and Cancer portal at https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes- prevention/risk/radiation/electromagnetic-fields-fact-sheet Weighing in on the same matter The World Health Organization WHO”)states,Based on a recent in-depth review of the scientific literature,the WHO concluded that current evidence does not confirm the existence of any health consequences from exposure to low level electromagnetic fields.However,some gaps in knowledge about biological effects exist and need further research.”WHO also asserts,Despite many studies,the evidence for any effect remains highly controversial.However,it is clear that if electromagnetic fields do have an effect on cancer,then any increase in risk will be extremely small.The results to date contain many inconsistencies,but no large increases in risk have been found for any cancer in children or adults.”For more information please visit WHO’s EMF Q&A website at https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/electromagnetic-fields The National Institute of Environmental Health Science NIEHS”)Electric Magnetic Fields web page at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/index.cfm states,If you are concerned about EMFs emitted by a power line or substation in your area,you can contact your local power company to schedule an on-site reading.You can also measure EMFs yourself with the use of a gaussmeter,which is available for purchase online through a number of retailers.” For further information and additional reading please visit: United States Environmental Protection Agency U.S.EPA”) https://www.epa.gov/radtown/electric-and-magnetic-fields-power-lines The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences NIEHS”)National Institutes of Health NIH”) https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/materials/electric_and_magnetic_fields_associated_with_the_use_of_electric_power_qu estions_and_answers_english_508.pdf 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 22 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 TSUNAMI MAP ADVISORY DISCUSSION:The California Emergency Management Agency CalEMA),the University of Southern California Tsunami Research Center USC),and the California Geological Survey CGS)have prepared maps that depict areas of maximum tsunami inundation for all populated areas at risk to tsunamis in California 20 coastal counties).The maps were publicly released in December 2009 with the stated purpose that the maps are to assist cities and counties in identifying their tsunami hazard and developing their coastal evacuation routes and emergency response plans only. These maps specifically contain the following disclaimer: Map Disclaimer: This tsunami inundation map was prepared to assist cities and counties in identifying their tsunami hazard. It is intended for local jurisdictional,coastal evacuation planning uses only.This map,and the information presented herein, is not a legal document and does not meet disclosure requirements for real estate transactions nor for any other regulatory purpose.The California Emergency Management Agency CalEMA),the University of Southern California USC),and the California Geological Survey CGS)make no representation or warranties regarding the accuracy of this inundation map nor the data from which the map was derived.Neither the State of California nor USC shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct,indirect,special,incidental or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or any third party on account of or arising from the use of this map. A tsunami is a series of ocean waves or surges most commonly caused by an earthquake beneath the sea floor.These maps show the maximum tsunami inundation line for each area expected from tsunamis generated by undersea earthquakes and landslides in the Pacific Ocean.Because tsunamis are rare events in the historical record,the maps provide no information about the probability of any tsunami affecting any area within a specific period of time. Although these maps may not be used as a legal basis for real estate disclosure or any other regulatory purpose,the CGS has, however,provided diagrams of the maps online which the public can view.To see a maximum tsunami inundation map for a specific coastal community,or for additional information about the construction and/or intended use of the tsunami inundation maps,visit the websites below: State of California Emergency Management Agency,Earthquake and Tsunami Program: http://myhazards.calema.ca.gov/ University of Southern California Tsunami Research Center: http://www.usc.edu/dept/tsunamis/2005/index.php State of California Geological Survey Tsunami Information: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/geologic_hazards/Tsunami/index.htm National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency Center for Tsunami Research MOST model): http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/time/background/models.html OIL & GAS WELL ADVISORY California is currently ranked fourth in the nation among oil producing states.Surface oil production is concentrated mainly in the Los Angeles Basin and Kern County,and in districts elsewhere in the state.In recent decades,real estate development has rapidly encroached into areas where oil production has occurred.Because the state's oil production has been in decline since the 1980's,thousands of oil and gas wells have been shut down or abandoned,and many of those wells are in areas where residential neighborhoods now exist. According to the California Department of Conservation DOC"),to date,about 230,000 oil and gas wells have been drilled in California and around 105,000 are still in use.The majority of remaining wells have been sealed capped")under the supervision of the DOC's Geologic Energy Management Division CalGEM).A smaller number have been abandoned and have no known responsible operator these are called orphan"wells.The state has a special fund that pays the cost of safely capping orphan wells,however,that program is limited in its scope and progress. Buyer should be aware that, while the DOC database is the most comprehensive source available for California oil and gas well information, the DOC makes no warranties that the database is absolutely complete, or that reported well locations are known with absolute accuracy. For More Information For a search of the state's databases of oil and gas wells and sites of known environmental contamination on or near the Property, please obtain the FANHD Residential Environmental Report.For general information,visit the California Department of Conservation,Geologic Energy Management Division CalGEM)at https://www.conservation.ca.gov/CalGEM/. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 23 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 END OF NATURAL HAZARD DISCLOSURE REPORT SECTION See Terms and Conditions at end of this Report. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 24 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports The Natural Hazard Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 California Property Tax Disclosure Report The parties for whom this Report was prepared are the owner or transferor Seller")of the Commercial Property Property")on the Report Date,the buyer or transferee Buyer")of the Commercial Property from Seller as of the Report Date,and their respective licensed real estate agents Agents").Seller,Buyer and the Agents are sometimes referred to herein as Party"or Parties." Part 1. Introduction and Summary This Tax Report section discusses the results of an electronic search of specified government lists Databases")containing real property tax information concerning the Commercial Property.This tax information is based on the County's Fiscal Year 2021- 2022 Secured Property Tax Roll and other sources identified in the Report.To understand the information provided,please read this entire Report. Summary of Property Tax Determinations The Commercial Property:IS IS NOT A.X NOT SUBJECT TO a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District.26 B.X NOT SUBJECT TO a 1915 Bond Act District.26 C.X NOT SUBJECT TO a Property Assessed Clean Energy PACE)Contract.26 D.X NOT SUBJECT TO other direct assessments.27 E.X NOT SUBJECT TO the State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fee SRA Fee is suspended until 2031 by Assembly Bill 398 of 2017). 31 Determined by First American Professional Real Estate Services,Inc. THIS IS A DATABASE REPORT ONLY:The tax information in this Report only provides data derived from the County Tax Assessor's and Treasure's Databases Databases")identified in this Report unless specified otherwise in the Report.While FANHD has made good faith efforts to report from the Databases as accurately as possible,the quality,accuracy,and currency Database Date")of the information contained in these Databases can vary greatly.For more information regarding a specific Database,please read Part 2 of this Report.By use of this Report,Buyer agrees this is a Report product and not an insurance policy and is subject to the Terms and Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 25 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports California Property Tax Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 2. NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX/ASSESSMENT Special assessments,also referred to as direct or fixed assessments,are charges that are not based on the value of the property. These charges are levied to provide funding for services or improvements that directly benefit the property.Mello-Roos Community Facility Districts and 1915 Bond Districts are also classified as special assessments.PACE contract agreements are typically created pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act or the 1915 Bond Act.Certain special assessments may be subject to accelerated foreclosure if allowed to go delinquent. TO THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY AT THE ADDRESS REFERENCED ABOVE: THIS IS A NOTIFICATION TO BUYER PRIOR TO PURCHASING THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. A. Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts This Commercial Property is NOT SUBJECT to Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts. Database: Secured Property Tax Roll Database Date: FY 2021-2022 B. 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts This Commercial Property is NOT SUBJECT to 1915 Bond Assessment Districts. Database: Secured Property Tax Roll Database Date: FY 2021-2022 C. Notice of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program Property assessed clean energy PACE)programs allow owners to finance energy and water efficiency and renewable energy projects,and qualifying seismic and wildfire safety improvements,on residential and commercial structures through a voluntary assessment on the property.PACE programs are offered by many city,county and regional agencies,with repayment periods from 5 to 20 years or more.PACE liens are authorized pursuant to Section 53328 of the California Government Code, (the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982") or California Streets & Highways Code Section 8500 (the "1915 Act") and are disclosed pursuant to Section 1102.6b of the California Civil Code. WHAT THIS MEANS:If a property owner voluntarily enters into a PACE program,a contractual assessment lien is placed on the property.The lien is repaid through installments collected on the property owner's secured county property tax bill.In certain situations the program administrator may bill the property owner directly.If the property is sold and the contractual assessment is not repaid in full,the new owner may be responsible for future assessments contributing towards repayment of the PACE contract. DISCLOSURES AT RESALE:A PACE lien runs with the land.This means that the responsibility to repay the PACE lien may fall to the new owner upon transfer of the property unless the lien is paid off before closing.This fact may be material to a buyer’s decision to purchase or price offered for the property.In addition,the buyer’s lender may require the lien to be paid in full before closing for certain federally backed mortgages,for example).Therefore,the property seller and his or her real estate agent may have a duty to disclose the existence of a PACE lien on the sale property. The Property IS NOT SUBJECT to a PACE lien documented in the county’s Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Secured Property Tax Roll. Note: Buyer should read the preliminary title report and obtain and read all exceptions listed therein to investigate any PACE lien executed more recently. In the title report, lien exceptions are named as recorded with the county; therefore, a PACE lien may be listed under a name that is not obvious. D. Accelerated Foreclosure Information Certain assessment or bond issues may contain accelerated foreclosure liens which have priority over other real property taxes and are a legal right included as part of the security for the obligation.The issuers of such bonds are often contractually required to monitor and collect delinquent assessments quickly.Accordingly,these assessments are not subject to the five 5)year waiting period applicable to ad valorem real property taxes.If the real property is subject to such an assessment and the taxes are not paid promptly,the real property may be foreclosed upon and sold at public auction on an expedited basis.Therefore, it is extremely important that the real property tax bill be paid on time to prevent the accelerated foreclosure. E. Approved Districts Which Have Been Formed and Authorized But Are Not Yet Levied Certain Mello-Roos Communities Facilities Districts or 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts may have been formed and authorized but have not yet to be levied.These Districts may not appear in this Report.However,the information regarding such districts may appear on your preliminary report issued by a title company.The district may levy a special tax on future property tax bills for the Property. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 26 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports California Property Tax Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 3. Current Property Tax Bill Summary A. Summary of 2021-2022 Property Tax Bill The following is a summary of Database information obtained from the SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Secured Property Tax Roll Database)for Tax Year 2021-2022 Database Date").This summary is provided for informational purposes only.The summary includes Ad Valorem taxes which are based on the property's Assessed Value as well as other Non-Ad Valorem Direct or Special Assessments.Upon transfer of ownership,the Assessed Value may be reset to the Current Market Value or Sale Price which may result in a substantial change in the Ad Valorem taxes assessed.Please see Parts 4 and 5 of this Report for more information regarding Ad Valorem taxes and Supplemental taxes. Total Assessed Value:$3,363,925.00 1st Installment Due 11/01/2021 $17,866.61 2nd Installment Due 02/01/2022 $17,866.61 Total Annual Tax Liability $35,733.22 General Ad Valorem Taxes AGENCY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CONTACT PHONE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PROPOSITION 13 BASIC TAX RATE $33,639.36 (805)781-5031 CA STATE WATER RESOURCES STATE WATER BOND $134.50 805-781-5831 SAN LUIS COASTAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SL COASTAL 2014 GO BOND $1,311.84 (805)788-2968 CUESTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT CUESTA CCD 2014 BOND $647.52 (805)788-2968 TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES $35,733.22 Direct and/or Special Assessments AGENCY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CONTACT PHONE TOTAL DIRECT ASSESSMENTS $0.00 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 27 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports California Property Tax Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 4. Estimating Property Taxes After the Sale Instantly and securely calculate estimated property taxes and supplemental taxes on our website by clicking on the following link or manually calculate them below): https://orderform.fanhd.com/Order/TaxCalcForm?token=rnBaZ8ebDshr4cfvfoBilYlbcZMGn6fuLYSZ37LbTxyUM0OT8oUImhpI7kfS xtOBk%2fglmvcvyakZmL0LMQmwpDxJtDheCV4XU2N3u06TWfA%3d A. Calculating Property Taxes After Sale (ESTIMATE ONLY) PROPERTY TAX ESTIMATOR The following calculation method is provided to assist Buyer in estimating the approximate amount of property tax charges that the Commercial Property may be subject to for the upcoming tax year based on the assessed valuation being equal to the sales price.The amount derived is only an estimate and is not a substitute for a tax bill from the County,nor does it anticipate new property tax charges,fees or other changes in the property tax rates for future tax years. 1 Estimated Sales Price...............................................................................................................•1 $ 2 Estimated Ad Valorem Tax Rate...............................................................................................•2 0.0106200 3 Multiply line 1 by line 2.This is your Estimated Ad Valorem Tax..............................................•3 $ 4 Direct Assessments including Mello Roos Special Taxes,1915 Bond Act Assessments or PACE Assessments applicable.................................................................................................4 0.00 5 Add lines 3 and 4.Total Estimated Annual Tax Amount After Sale...........................................•5 $ The information in this subparagraph A is an estimate only.The purpose of this ESTIMATOR"is to assist Buyer in planning for property taxes which will be applicable after the Sale Date.This ESTIMATOR"requires the Buyer's projection of the purchase price of the Commercial Property.Please note that potential exemptions and exclusions are not reflected in this estimate. Additionally, undeveloped or recently developed properties may be subject to additional Direct Assessments not included in this estimate. FANHD is not responsible or liable for any losses, liabilities or damages resulting from use of this Property Tax Estimator. B. Exemptions & Exclusions to Ad Valorem Taxes California law provides certain exemptions or exclusions from reassessments.In order to determine if Buyer may qualify for any exemptions or exclusions or to obtain a comprehensive list of available exemptions and exclusions,please contact the County Tax Assessors Office 805-781-5831 or visit the County website at https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Assessor.aspx. Additional information is also available on the website for the California Board of Equalization at www.boe.ca.gov Reassessment Due to Decline in Value Real estate markets are cyclical.In a less competitive market there are more sellers than buyers,and real estate prices can drop, sometimes precipitously.When a property is sold,in most cases its assessed value for tax purposes is set equal to the sale price. A drop in market value can mean the original assessment,and your property tax bill,is too high. The County Tax Assessors Office is required to lower the assessment of any real property if it is higher than the current market value as of January 1 of each year.Each case is reviewed individually upon request by the property owner for the current year or the upcoming year.The annual deadline for filing an appeal the assessment appeal filing date”is November 30 in most California counties.For more information or to obtain a property tax reassessment request form,contact the Tax Assessors Office or visit the SAN LUIS OBISPO County website. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 28 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports California Property Tax Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 5. Supplemental Property Tax Information A. General Information Regarding Supplemental Taxes California law mandates the county assessor to reappraise real property upon a change in ownership or completion of new construction.The assessor's office issues a supplemental assessment which reflects the difference between the prior assessed value and the new assessment.This value is prorated based on the number of months remaining in the fiscal tax year which ends June 30. Notices of the supplemental assessment are mailed out to the property owners prior to the issuance of the supplemental tax bill or refund if the value is reduced.The taxes or refund based on the supplemental assessment are in addition to the regular annual tax bill. The supplemental tax will be due from the current owner in addition to the regular tax assessment.Accordingly for the first year of ownership,Buyer should plan for this additional payment. B. Supplemental Property Tax Disclosure The following notice is mandated by California Civil Code Section 1102.6c: NOTICE OF YOUR "SUPPLEMENTAL" PROPERTY TAX BILL California property tax law requires the Assessor to revalue real property at the time the ownership of the property changes. Because of this law, you may receive one or two supplemental tax bills, depending on when your loan closes. The supplemental tax bills are not mailed to your lender. If you have arranged for your property tax payments to be paid through an impound account, the supplemental tax bills will not be paid by your lender. It is your responsibility to pay these supplemental bills directly to the Tax Collector. If you have any question concerning this matter, please call your local Tax Assessor or Collector's Office." SAN LUIS OBISPO County Assessor Phone:805-781-5831 Website:https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Assessor.aspx 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 29 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports California Property Tax Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 C. Calculating Supplemental Taxes After Sale (ESTIMATE ONLY) Instantly and securely calculate estimated property taxes and supplemental taxes on our website or manually calculate them below): https://orderform.fanhd.com/Order/TaxCalcForm?token=rnBaZ8ebDshr4cfvfoBilYlbcZMGn6fuLYSZ37LbTxyUM0OT8oUImhpI7kfS xtOBk%2fglmvcvyakZmL0LMQmwpDxJtDheCV4XU2N3u06TWfA%3d SUPPLEMENTAL TAX ESTIMATOR The following schedule is provided to estimate the potential amount of the supplemental taxes on a given property and does NOT include the amount of the regular annual ad valorem property tax.The following calculation provides an estimate of the supplemental property taxes that can be expected during the first year of ownership,and should be used for planning purposes only. 1 Estimated Sales Price...............................................................................................................•1 $ 2 Estimated Current Assessed Value...........................................................................................•2 $3,363,925.00 3 Subtract line 2 from line 1. Estimated Supplemental Assessed Value.................................................................................3 4 Multiply line 3 by 0.0106200 the Estimated Ad Valorem Tax Rate for the Commercial Property). Estimated Full-Year Supplemental Tax Obligation...................................................................4 If the Sale Date for the Commercial Property falls during the months of January through May, Buyer will receive TWO supplemental tax bills: (a) one for the current partial tax year; and (b) one for the next full tax year. The supplemental taxes can be estimated by completing lines 5 through 8 below: 5 Enter the Month-of-Sale Factor from TABLE 1 below..............................................................•5 6 Multiply line 4 by line 5. Estimated Supplemental Tax Bill 1.........................................................................................6 7 Enter the amount on line 4. Estimated Supplemental Tax Bill 2.........................................................................................7 8 Add lines 6 and 7.Total estimated Supplemental Tax Bill.........................................................•8 $ If the Sale Date for the Commercial Property falls during the months of June through December, Buyer will receive ONE supplemental tax bill. The supplemental tax can be estimated by completing lines 9 and 10 below: 9 Enter the Month-of-Sale Factor from TABLE 2 below..............................................................•9 10 Multiply line 4 by line 9.Total estimated Supplemental Tax Bill................................................•10 $ TABLE 1. Month-of-Sale Factor TABLE 2. Month-of-Sale Factor Jan 0.4167 Jun 1.0000 Feb 0.3333 Jul 0.9167 Mar 0.2500 Aug 0.8333 Apr 0.1667 Sept 0.7500 May 0.0833 Oct 0.6667 Nov 0.5833 Dec 0.5000 The information in this subparagraph C is an estimate only.The purpose of this ESTIMATOR"is to assist Buyer in planning for the supplemental taxes.The estimated supplemental tax is not a substitute for the supplemental bill and may not be relied upon as such.This ESTIMATOR"requires the Buyer's projection of the purchase price of the Commercial Property as well as month in which the transaction will be consummated.Please note that potential exemptions and exclusions are not reflected in these estimations.FANHD is not responsible or liable for any losses,liabilities or damages resulting from use of this Supplemental Tax Estimator. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 30 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports California Property Tax Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Part 6. State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fee In 2011,the California Legislature and Governor enacted a Fire Prevention Fee"on habitable structures in the State's wildland fire responsibility area SRA").The yearly fee,levied on property owners,paid for various activities to prevent and suppress wildfires in the SRA,and was most recently at the rate of 152.33 per habitable structure on the property. Effective July 1, 2017, as authorized by Assembly Bill 398 and signed by the Governor, that fire prevention fee is suspended until 2031. The fire prevention activities supported by the fee will continue,but instead will be funded through a different State programoneaimedatcurbingindustrialemissionsofcarbondioxidealsoknownasCalifornia's cap-and-trade"program).For more information,please refer to the text of the Assembly bill at the following link: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB398 Part 7. DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX ADVISORY: Governmental Assessments Paid at the Close of Escrow Documentary Transfer Tax Defined.Under California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 11911-11929,counties and cities are authorized to impose a tax on the transfer of real property located within their jurisdiction.The tax is commonly known by various names,including the Documentary Transfer Tax,or Real Property Transfer Tax,or Real Estate Transfer Tax hereinafter, the Transfer Tax"). How Much?The one-time"payment is made at the close of escrow and routinely documented on the HUD-1 Settlement Statement.The amount of the Transfer Tax is typically based on the value or sales price of the real estate that is transferred.The county rate is one dollar and ten cents 1.10)for each one thousand dollars 1,000)of value.The rate for non-charter general law")cities is one-half of the county rate and is credited against the county tax due.Charter cities may impose a Transfer Tax at a rate higher than the county rate. For any city or county in California,the Transfer Tax rate Tax Rate Table")is available at no charge from many sources,most conveniently on the website of the California Local Government Finance Almanac (sponsored by the California League of Cities). http://www.californiacityfinance.com/PropTransfTaxRates.pdf To estimate the Transfer Taxes for the Property,multiply the Property's estimated sales price in thousands of dollars)by the amount shown in the Tax Rate Table for the city and county in which the Property is located. Who Pays?The law states that,the Transfer Tax must be paid by the person who makes,signs or issues any document subject to the tax,or for whose use or benefit the document is made,signed or issued."In practice,this means that the payment of the Transfer Tax is customarily made by the Seller or the Buyer,or shared by both,depending on the jurisdiction in which the transferred Property is located. END OF TAX DISCLOSURE REPORT SECTION See Terms and Conditions at end of this Report. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 31 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports California Property Tax Disclosure Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Environmental Screening Report Is Property Listed in a Disclosed Database? YES X The determination here indicates whether the exact property address as listed above was found in any of the databases searched for this Report.Please note that there may be errors or omissions in the addresses contained in the Local,State and Federal databases that prevent an exact match in this search.Refer to the lists beginning in the section titled Sites Missing Key Location Information"for site addresses that may be similar to the subject property address or that do not include sufficient address information to precisely locate the site on a map NO Summary of Environmental Site Search DATABASE SEARCHED (See "Description of Databases Searched" below) Are Any Contaminated Sites in Database? 0 to 1/8 mile 1/8 to 1/2 mile 1/2 to 1 mile Federal National Priorities List or Superfund"sites NPL)YES 0 0 0 Corrective Action Sites RCRA COR)YES 0 0 0 Federal Sites investigated for possible inclusion in the NPL SEMS)MAYBE 0 0 N/A SEMS Sites That Have Been Archived SEMS-Archived) 0 0 N/A Treatment,Storage Disposal Sites for Hazardous Materials RCRA TSD) 0 0 N/A Tribal UST And/Or Tribal LUST MAYBE 0 0 N/A State EnviroStor Cleanup Sites Database ENVIROSTOR)MAYBE 1 7 N/A State List of Spills,Leaks,Investigation Cleanup SLIC)YES 3 4 N/A State List of Solid Waste Landfill Facilities SWIS)MAYBE 0 2 N/A State List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks LUST)YES 2 4 N/A EnviroStor Site With Deed Restriction Or Other Controls CONTROLS)MAYBE 0 0 N/A Potential Generator of hazardous materials Sites RCRA GEN) 6 N/A N/A Emergency Response Notification System ERNS,National Response Center)MAYBE 0 N/A N/A State List of Underground Storage Tanks UST) 0 N/A N/A State List of Historical Underground Storage Tanks Hist-UST) 0 N/A N/A State Hazardous Waste Information Summary HWIS)YES 9 N/A N/A State List of Aboveground Storage Tanks AST)1 N/A N/A N/A = Not Applicable Under Required AAI Search Standard.AAI TOTALS 22 17 0 MAYBE = Contamination is possible;for example,CONTAMINATED SITE TOTALS 14 8 0 the database searched includes a mix of contaminated and TOTAL OF SITES FOUND 39 non-contaminated sites that are not distinguished,or landfill sites where contamination is common although not certainly identified,or sites currently being investigated for contamination by the responsible agency. Determined by Third-Party Disclosure Provider(s)FIRST AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES,INC.Date 1/05/2022 Rept.No.2976335 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 32 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Sites Found on the Databases Searched UST sites are selected from the list maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board.Information regarding the contents of the tank,and any inspections or testing can be found on the web page http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/.AST site information can be obtained from the responsible county or local government agency identified in the Unified Program directory available at https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/pipeline-safety-and-cupa/certified-unified-program-agency-cupa/.Sites that have been identified as having a leak may also appear on one or more of the other lists reported above.Sites listed on LUST or RCRACOR may not appear on the UST or AST lists if the tank has been removed and the case has been closed.Sites listed on the SWIS list may contain hazardous materials.Information is available at https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/Site/Search. NPL sites are listed by the U.S.EPA as contaminated sites that have received Federal funding to assist in cleanup.Information is available from the State at www.dtsc.ca.gov or from www.epa.gov and by calling 916)323-3399.The SEMS formerly CERCLIS) list includes sites the Federal EPA is investigating for possible inclusion on the NPL. For information on the lists searched for this Report see the Description of Databases Searched"Section that follows. Open Site listed as undergoing clean-up,investigation,or referral to another agency;or as non-active,abandoned or absorbed but not closed or completed. Closed Site listed as clean-up completed,release secured,no further remedial action planned,case closed,or delisted. Active (or Inactive)Site facility listed as actively or not actively)engaged in a type of activity regulated under RCRA. Deed Site listed as completed or closed with a deed restriction. N/A Not Applicable site listed as uncontaminated,or as using or storing hazardous substances. N/P Not Provided site status not supplied on agency list used. Site Name Address Case No.Status Database SAN LUIS OBISPO RADY MIX PLANT 219-B TANK FARM ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 N/P N\p CA_AST ENTEGRIS,INC.4175 SANTA FE RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD982504391 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SAN LUIS STRUCK SERVICE GARAGE 219 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD982496713 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SAES PARKER UHP COMP CORP 4175 B SANTA FE RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAR000013474 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC 277 GRANADA DR,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401- 0000 CAD982501983 Active FED_RCRA_GEN ACCESSORY PRODUCTIONS 245 TANK FARM RD UNIT K,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CA0000240044 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SAN LUIS OBISPO PAINTING COMPANY 225 TANK FARM ROAD C1),SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000403802 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PROMEGA BIOSCIENCES LLC 277 GRANADA DR,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD982501983 N/P CA_HWIS SNIDER PRECISION,INC.648 CLARION CT,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000225300 N/P CA_HWIS SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO 224 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000298618 N/P CA_HWIS DYER'S DIESELRO 271 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000323759 N/P CA_HWIS D'ANGELOS SONS INC 277 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000346245 N/P CA_HWIS SAN LUIS AMBULANCE SERVICE INC 261 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000351477 N/P CA_HWIS REEVES AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR 235 TANK FARM RD UNIT C,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000365722 N/P CA_HWIS CHEVRON USA ABNU0002 SLO TANK FARM 276 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAR000054825 N/P CA_HWIS XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT INC. USM 219 TANK FARM RD A,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAR000216465 N/P CA_HWIS ZUPAN'S EQUIPMENT RENTAL 635 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 T0607900009 Closed CA_LUST PACIFIC BELL 196 SUBURBAN,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 T0607925011 Closed CA_LUST SAN LUIS TRUCK SERVICE GARAGE 219 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 T0607985770 Closed CA_SLIC LAIDLAW TRANSIT FACILITY 4155 SANTA FE RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 T0607900038 Closed CA_LUST JBL SCIENTIFIC FACILITY 277 GRANADA DR,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA SLT3S1561326 Closed CA_SLIC Former Martinelli Property Prado Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 T10000001206 Closed CA_SLIC Chevron Former UNOCAL)Tank Farm Road Bulk Storage 276 Tank Farm Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93406 SL203011375 Open CA_SLIC S.L.O COUNTY FARM SUPPLY 675 TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 T0607900004 Closed CA_LUST Volny Investment Company 710 Aerovista Park,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 T10000010082 Open CA_SLIC SBC PAC BELL)196 SUBURBAN RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 T0607956723 Closed CA_LUST 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 33 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Site Name Address Case No.Status Database UNOCAL PIPELINE-TANK FARM ROAD TANK FARM RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 SL203031242 Closed CA_SLIC J.B.DEWAR 75 PRADO RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 T0607909561 Closed CA_LUST Cowan former Serafino-Martinelli) Property East Prado Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 T10000002348 Closed CA_SLIC COUNTY FARM SUPPLY 675 TANK FARM ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 40070003 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP CALIFORNIA COOPERAGE 870 INDUSTRIAL WAY,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 40250001 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP Pacific West Circuits 189 Granada Drive,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 71002836 Closed CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AIRPORT San Luis Obispo,CA 80000759 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP B&B COLLISION REPAIR 845 FIERO LANE,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 60002344 Closed CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP JBL Scientific 227 Granada,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 60002454 Closed CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP EG&G Coatings 710 Aerovista Parkway,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 60002455 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP SAES PUREGAS 4173 SANTA FE ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 60002343 Closed CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP Jim Filbin Aggregates 4398 Santa Fe Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 40-AA-0041 Closed CA_SWIS HZIU Kompogas SLO,Inc.4388 Old Santa Fe Springs Rd.,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 40-AA-0051 Open CA_SWIS Sites Missing Key Location Information Open Site listed as undergoing clean-up,investigation,or referral to another agency;or as non-active,abandoned or absorbed but not closed or completed. Closed Site listed as clean-up completed,release secured,no further remedial action planned,case closed,or delisted. Active (or Inactive)Site facility listed as actively or not actively)engaged in a type of activity regulated under RCRA. Deed Site listed as completed or closed with a deed restriction. N/A Not Applicable site listed as uncontaminated,or as using or storing hazardous substances. N/P Not Provided site status not supplied on agency list used. Many environmental sites in the databases searched have incomplete address information and cannot be precisely located.They are,therefore,considered unlocatable”with the geocoding methods used in this Report,and could potentially be anywhere in the Property city,county,or state.The table below includes unlocatable sites whose address contains a zip code that matches the Property zip code or matches a neighboring zip code whose boundary is within the radius distance searched.The sites listed are not necessarily within one mile of the Property,and they are not included on the site map in this Report.The databases searched include a large number of unlocatable addresses,and the list below is limited to a maximum of 30 sites per database searched.If you wish to view a full list of ALL unlocatable sites in California,please download the full list from our website at the following address: https://orderform.fanhd.com/Content/Files/Enviro/Current_List_of_Unlocatable_Sites_in_California.xlsx Site Name Address Case No.Status Database CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 675 CALIFORNIA ST.,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST COASTAL REPROGRAPHICS 880 VIA ESTEBAN B,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST U.P.S.3601 SACRAMENTO ST.,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST ARROYO GRAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL/EAST TANK 345 HALCYON,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST ARROYO GRANDE SHELL STATION 222 GRAND AVENUE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST BEACON STATION 3515 610 GRAND AVE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST BEWLEY'S CHEVRON 251 GRAND AVE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST GILL'S FOOD MART 1490 GRAND AVENUE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST KATCH GO PETROLEUM 1294 GRAND AVENUE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST LOPEZ LAKE MARINA 6820 LOPEZ LAKE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST TOSCO CORP SITE 4232 823 GRAND AVENUE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST PACIFIC BELL SE-162)133 SAN RAFAEL,AVILA BEACH,CA 93424 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST PG&E DCPP 3890 AVILA BEACH DRIVE,AVILA BEACH,CA 93424 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST PORT SAN LUIS HARBOR DISTRICT PORT SAN LUIS,AVILA BEACH,CA 93424 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST PACIFIC BELL SE-191)LYNCH CANYON,BRADLEY,CA 93426 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST CENTRAL FUEL FACILITY BUILDING 3090,CAMP ROBERTS,CA 93451 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST CHEVRON BY THE SEA 198 OCEAN AVE,CAYUCOS,CA 93430 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 34 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Site Name Address Case No.Status Database CHEVRON STATION 98425 1284 GRAND AVENUE,GROVER BEACH,CA 93433 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST CIRCLE K STORES,INC 5688 684 GRAND AVE,GROVER BEACH,CA 93433 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST CITY OF MORRO BAY 1 QUINTANA RD,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST CHEVRON 95867 460 TEFFT ST.,NIPOMO,CA 93444 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST NIPOMO SHELL 501 TEFFT ST.,NIPOMO,CA 93444 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST R CORNER STORE 459 TEFFT ST.,NIPOMO,CA 93444 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST AERO SERVICE 3155 TAXIWAY C C-6),PASO ROBLES,CA 93446 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST ARCO AM/PM 6351 1201 YSABEL,PASO ROBLES,CA 93446 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST PACIFIC METALS MFRS CO,INC TAXIWAY,PASO ROBLES,CA 93446 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST CUESTA COLLEGE HIGHWAY 1,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 N/P N/P CA_HIST_UST DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT 9 MILES NW OF AVILA BEACH,AVILA BEACH,CA N/P N\p CA_AST DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT ,AVILA BEACH,CA 93424 N/P N\p CA_AST MORRO BAY ST.PARK RD.,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 N/P N\p CA_AST MORRO BAY POWER PLANT 1290 EMBARCADERO RD.,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 N/P N\p CA_AST HOWARD PRODUCTS INC 560 LINE RD,PASO ROBLES,CA 93446 N/P N\p CA_AST CUESTA 427 SAN JOAQUIN,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 N/P N\p CA_AST CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY RECEIVING WAREHOUSE,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93409 N/P N\p CA_AST WHITAKER CONTRACTORS,INC 22985 EL CAMIMO REAL,SANTA MARGARITA,CA 93453 N/P N\p CA_AST SHANDON PUMP STATION 17525 STATE HWY.46 E.,SHANDON,CA N/P N\p CA_AST TEMPLETON SERVICE CENTER 160 COW MEADOW PLACE,TEMPLETON,CA 93465 N/P N\p CA_AST TEMPLETON READY MIX PLANT 444 VOLPI YSABEL,TEMPLETON,CA 93465 N/P N\p CA_AST PASO ROBLES 188 VOLPI YSABEL,TEMPLETON,CA 93426 N/P N\p CA_AST MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY SCHOOL HWY 1 AT CAMP SLO,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93405 CAR000074443 Active FED_RCRA_GEN MOBIL OIL CORP ADELAIDA STA VINEYARD RD SHEEP CAMP CR,SAN LUIS OBISPO CO,CA 93401 CAT000623215 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL N/O WELLS SWITCH ROAD,PASO ROBLES,CA 93446 CAT080024128 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL S/O KILER CANYON ROAD,PASO ROBLES,CA 93446 CAT080024144 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL SAN LUIS OBISPO-ARROYO GRANDE,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAT080024151 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL 1500 BLOCK HILLCREST DRIVE,GROVER BEACH, CA 93443 CAT080024276 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL S/S SAN GABRIEL ROAD,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 CAT080024045 Active FED_RCRA_GEN MCFARLAND ENERGY ARROYO GRANDE ORMONDE RD 1M SE PRICE CYN RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD980895361 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SAN LUIS OBISPO CO RM370 COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93408 CAD980883227 Active FED_RCRA_GEN CHEVRON USA INC ATASCADERO STA SEC 4 T28S R13E MDBM,ATASCADERO,CA 93442 CAD000629287 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SL 36-9-09N SECTION 1 9700 EL CAMINO RD,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 CAP000274795 Active FED_RCRA_GEN RESERVOIR NO 1 GROVER BEACH 1541 HILLCREST DR,GROVER BEACH,CA 93433 CAR000065946 Active FED_RCRA_GEN NG CO 1111 HWY 101,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 CAD981381098 Active FED_RCRA_GEN MOBIL OIL CORP ESTERO BAY TERM PACIFIC COAST HWY 1 AT TORO CR,SAN LUIS OBISPO CO,CA 93401 CAT000623280 Active FED_RCRA_GEN MOBIL OIL CORP SAN ANTONIO STA LK NACIMIENTO ORO FINO CYN,SAN LUIS OBISPO CO,CA 93401 CAT000623330 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL E/O EDNA-PISMO BEACH,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 CAT080024003 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL E/S MONTEREY ROAD,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 CAT080024037 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SHELL SERVICE STATION 2699 SHELL BEACH BLVD,PISMO BEACH,CA 93449 CAR000126136 Active FED_RCRA_GEN TEXACO INC ESTERO BAY TANK FARM LOT 34 RANCHO MORRO CAYUCOS,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 CAD000631416 Active FED_RCRA_GEN VONS 2560 1758 GRAND AVE,GROVER BEACH,CA 93433 CAR000242016 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SAN LUIS OBISPO SUBSTATION 2448 ORCUTT ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAP000280602 Active FED_RCRA_GEN MORRO BAY SWITCHYARD HIGHWAY 1 AT MAIN,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 CAD983639766 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SAN LUIS OBISPO GOLF COUNTRY CLUB COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD029329489 Active FED_RCRA_GEN 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 35 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Site Name Address Case No.Status Database PACIFIC BELL NORTH END OF STEINER CREEK RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAT080024169 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL SANTA FE ROAD EDNA ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 CAT080024177 Active FED_RCRA_GEN PACIFIC BELL CAL STATE POLY,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAT080024292 Active FED_RCRA_GEN SAN LUIS OBISPO SUBSTATION 2448 ORCUTT RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAR000289306 Active FED_RCRA_GEN RITE AID 5824 1207 GRAND AVE,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 CA0000068791 N/P CA_HWIS MAINLAND MACHINE LTD.2930 MCMILLIAN RD UNIT E,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CA0000483826 N/P CA_HWIS CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO HIGHWAY 1,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93403 CA8572890095 N/P CA_HWIS CALTRANS D-05/EA 05-1C0804 NB SB 101,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 CAC002870943 N/P CA_HWIS AMY JAMES ROSE 3395 MACHAWK DRIVE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 CAC002892684 N/P CA_HWIS ROBERT WEATHERFORD 1452 FREDRICKS ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93405 CAC002892896 N/P CA_HWIS MAX SCHAEFERS 202 MONTE CRISTO PLACE,CAMBRIA,CA 93248 CAC002895188 N/P CA_HWIS SMS LLC,ETAL 1252 FOOTHILL BLVD.APT.7,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93405 CAC002900980 N/P CA_HWIS SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN 1035 PALM STREET,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93408 CAC002905929 N/P CA_HWIS WICKS ROOFING 917 BUCKLEY ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAC002912756 N/P CA_HWIS CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BISHOP STREET,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAC002912822 N/P CA_HWIS CALTRANS D-05/EA 05-1H0804 1,41,58,101,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAC002917022 N/P CA_HWIS CALTRANS D-05/EA 05-1G35A4 RTE 1,46,101,154,166,227,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAC002922575 N/P CA_HWIS WILLIAM RONNA MALLIOS 3190 ESTRELLA COURT UNIT C,SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 CAC002928561 N/P CA_HWIS ERNIE BALL INC 4117 EARTHWOOD LN,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD981416498 N/P CA_HWIS PAULS DRY CLEANERS INC 214 HIGUERG ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD981666464 N/P CA_HWIS SAES PURE GAS INC 4175 A SANTA FE ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD982504391 N/P CA_HWIS RIZZOLIS AUTOMOTIVE INC 2584 VICTORIA ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAD983601279 N/P CA_HWIS SLO PLASTERING INC 1565 MAXWELTON ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000044173 N/P CA_HWIS AM PAC REPAIR 4149 SANTA FE ST UNIT 8,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000230408 N/P CA_HWIS ALLTEC INTERGARATED MANUFACTURING INC 4330 B SANTA FE RD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000267918 N/P CA_HWIS LOCKHEED MARTIN UNMANNED INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 125 VENTURE DR STE 110,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000385432 N/P CA_HWIS CLOUD COMPANY INC 4855 MORABITO PL,SN LUIS OBISP,CA 93401 CAL000394716 N/P CA_HWIS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS SAN LUIS OBISPO 250,260 270 BRIDGE ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000401096 N/P CA_HWIS SRAM LLC 4720 ALLENE WAY,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000407993 N/P CA_HWIS TOP PRECISION LLC 1221 PROSPECT LN,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000416119 N/P CA_HWIS SUNBELT RENTALS INC PC 665 1251 PROSPECT ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000425610 N/P CA_HWIS VICTORIAS SECRET STORE 701 898 HIGURA ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 CAL000426148 N/P CA_HWIS 2555 WILLOW RD,ARROYO GRANDE,CA 93420 1253371 Open FED_ERNS 2040 GUADALUPE RD,NIPOMO,CA 93444 1271118 Open FED_ERNS OLDE PORT BEACH,AVILA BEACH,CA 0 1236587 N/P FED_ERNS MP 231.5 ,PASO ROBLES,CA 0 1236907 N/P FED_ERNS MOORING PORT SAN LUIS,AVILA BEACH,CA 0 1237045 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT BEHIND PISMO COAST VILLAGE RV RESORT,PISMO BEACH,CA 0 1237075 N/P FED_ERNS PORT SAN LUIS MARINA ,AVILA BEACH,CA 0 1237800 N/P FED_ERNS MORROW BAY LAUNCH RAMP 200 BLOCK OF EMBARCADERO,MORROW BAY,CA 0 1238114 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT MORRO BAY,MORRO BAY,CA 0 1238155 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT 1279 EMBARCADERO DR.,MORRO BAY,CA 0 1238591 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT 1279 EMBARCADERO BLVD,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 1238742 N/P FED_ERNS MORRO BAY 1275 EMBARCADERO ROAD,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 1239072 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT 201 MAIN STREET,MORRO BAY,CA 0 1239236 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT 1279 EMBARCADERO BLVD,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 1241210 N/P FED_ERNS 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 36 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Site Name Address Case No.Status Database UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT 400 EMBARCADERO ROAD,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 1242198 N/P FED_ERNS MORRO BAY HARBOR SOUTH T PIER MORRO BAY,CA 0 1243200 N/P FED_ERNS USCG STA MORRO BAY NORTH T PIER) 1279 EMBARCADERO BLVD,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 1243605 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT 1275 EMBARCADERA,MORRO BAY,CA 0 1244798 N/P FED_ERNS MAIN LINE MP:212.87,PASO ROBLES,CA 0 1245971 N/P FED_ERNS MAIN LINE MP:250.33,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 0 1249532 N/P FED_ERNS 351 EMBARCADERO,MORRO,CA 0 1250766 N/P FED_ERNS S SPRING ST/NIBLICK ST,PASO ROBLES,CA 0 1253101 N/P FED_ERNS ATASCADERO STATE BEACH ,MORROW BAY,CA 0 1255080 N/P FED_ERNS UNKNOWN SHEEN INCIDENT CAYUCOS BEACH,CAYUCOS,CA 0 1255187 N/P FED_ERNS INCIDENT OCCURRED ACROSS SAN LOUIS OFFICE 3950 AVILA BEACH DRIVE,AVILA BEACH,CA 0 1265731 Closed FED_ERNS PORT SAN LUIS HARBOR MOORING NUMBER 297 MOORING NUMBER 297,AVILA BEACH,CA 0 1267091 N/P FED_ERNS PORT SAN LUIS HARBOR DISTRICT 3950 AVILA BEACH DR,AVILA BEACH,CA 93424 201015_002839 N/P CA_GEO_UST PG&E DCPP 9 MILES NORTHWEST OF AVILA BEACH,AVILA BEACH,CA 93424 190722_002829 N/P CA_GEO_UST AT&T California SE191 172 Wendy Way,Bradley,CA 93426 FA0002802 N/P CA_GEO_UST CUESTA COLLEGE Highway 1,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 N/P CA_GEO_UST TEMPLETON MARKET DELI 390 Main St,TEMPLETON,CA 93465 200414_002903 N/P CA_GEO_UST AT&T California SE162 133 San Rafael St,Avila Beach,CA 93424 FA0002812 N/P CA_GEO_UST SAN MIGUEL CHEVRON 998 K St,SAN MIGUEL,CA 93452 N/P CA_GEO_UST PACIFIC METALS MFRS CO,INC TAXIWAY D,PASO ROBLES,CA 93446 210304_002585 N/P CA_GEO_UST US ARMY 18000 EAST PERIMETER ROAD,CAMP ROBERTS, CA 93451 FA-00-0 2533 N/P CA_GEO_UST CENTRAL FUEL FACILITY BUILDING 3090,CAMP ROBERTS,CA 93451 190822_002584 N/P CA_GEO_UST SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK DISPOSAL SITE SOUTH OF PRADO ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 40490007 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP COLD CANYON LANDFILL EDNA ROAD,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 40490009 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP CHEVRON ATASCADERO PUMPING STATION HWY 41 5 MILES EAST OF ATASCADERO, ATASCADERO,CA 93422 40290002 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP TEAL PETROLEUM PRICE CANYON ROAD,SHELL BEACH,CA 93449 40290004 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP TREATMENT PLANT FOOT OF FIERO STREET,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 40890001 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP CALIFORNIA MENS COLONY HWY 1,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93409 40920001 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP CALIF VALLEY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITE END OF BELMONT RD,CALIF VALLEY,CA 93457 40950001 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP HENDERSON PETROLEUM ORCUTT ROAD AT RAILROAD N SIDE OF ORCUT, SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 40290014 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP MORRO BAY DISPOSAL SITE HIGHWAY 1,1 MILE WEST OF MORRO BAY,MORRO BAY,CA 93442 40290016 Open CA_ENVIROSTOR_CLEANUP 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 37 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 Description of Databases Searched The FANHD Commercial Environmental Screening Report is based on an electronic search of certain federal,tribal and state level environmental-hazard record systems,or databases.These databases are searched for hazard sites within certain radius distances around the subject property.The databases searched,and the radius distances searched from the subject property, comply with the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency EPA)All Appropriate Inquiry"AAI)standard for government records search 40 CFR Part 312.26)under the U.S.Small Business Liability Relief and Revitalization Act the Brownfields Law"). The government databases searched for this Report are identified below,along with the abbreviation used in this Report,and a brief explanation about the nature of the hazard sites included in those databases. DISCLAIMER: An EPA-compliant government records search is only one part of the "All Appropriate Inquiry" standard defined under the Brownfields Law. Compliance with all parts of the Brownfields Law is required for an "innocent landowner defense" against the future discovery of contamination on the property. This Report, by itself, does NOT provide that liability protection. Please see the Terms and Conditions Section for additional information on the preparation and limitations of this Report. Federal National Priorities List, or "Superfund" sites (SEMS NPL): This is a list compiled by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency EPA)of contaminated sites with the highest priority of cleanup.The federal EPA is required to force clean up of these sites under the authority of a law called the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act CERCLA),which is commonly called Superfund".The status of National Priority List NPL”)and non-NPL sites governed by the statute is now contained in the U.S.EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS”)which replaced the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Information System CERCLIS”) Source Agency: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Search Distance Used: 1.0 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 27 Oct 2020 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the Environmental Information Center for US EPA Region 9 at 866)372-9378 or via e- mail at r9.info@epa.gov. Corrective Action Sites, sites with Known Contamination (RCRA COR): This subset of the RCRA database also known as the RCRA CORRACTS List),maintained by US EPA,identifies sites subject to corrective action"at which contamination has been discovered and where some level of corrective clean-up activity has been or may be undertaken.For example,a site may have been on the RCRA TSD or a RCRA GEN site list see above),and was placed on the CORRACTS list once contamination was discovered and remediation was underway. Source Agency: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Search Distance Used: 1.0 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 01 Sep 2021 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the Environmental Information Center for US EPA Region 9 at 866)372-9378 or via e- mail at r9.info@epa.gov. Federal Sites Investigated for Possible Inclusion in the NPL (SEMS): The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS),which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool.Replacing The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,and Liability Act Information System CERCLIS),SEMS provides updated data on the inventory of active and archived hazardous waste sites evaluated by the Superfund program.It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List NPL)as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. After investigation is complete,the sites on this list will either be closed because no contamination was found,added to the NPL to be cleaned up,or sent to a local state overseeing agency for clean-up. Source Agency: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 27 Oct 2020 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the Environmental Information Center for US EPA Region 9 at 866)372-9378 or via e- mail at r9.info@epa.gov. SEMS Sites That Have Been Archived (SEMS-Archived): Most sites in this database have been assigned the status NFRAP”which means No Further Response Action Planned"). These sites,once listed in the active SEMS database,which has replaced CERCLIS,have been removed from that database into 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 38 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 an archive list because they have been assessed by the EPA and determined not to require further remedial action under the Superfund Program. Source Agency: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 29 Oct 2020 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the Environmental Information Center for US EPA Region 9 at 866)372-9378 or via e- mail at r9.info@epa.gov. Treatment, Storage and Disposal Sites for Hazardous Materials (RCRA TSD): TSD stands for Treatment,Storage and Disposal.This list of facilities is maintained by the Federal EPA,and includes sites that are licensed to treat,store,or dispose of hazardous substances.They are not necessarily contaminated. Source Agency: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 28 Oct 2020 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the Environmental Information Center for US EPA Region 9 at 866)372-9378 or via e- mail at r9.info@epa.gov. Tribal UST And/Or Tribal LUST: Federally recognized Native American tribes are sovereign entities subject to federal laws.Underground storage tanks including leaking tanks,UST/LUST)located on tribal lands generally are not subject to state laws.As a result,unless a state acts as a tribe's agent pursuant to a formal agreement with a tribe,EPA and the tribe are responsible for implementing and enforcing the UST program on tribal lands.There are approximately 6,000 UST/LUST's on Native American lands in the U.S.The EPA works with tribal entities to identify and assess hazards to public health and the environment on tribal lands from UST's and LUST's,to bring all tanks on tribal lands into compliance so as to prevent future leaks and to cleanup existing leaks.Other tribal databases are not included in this search.The EPA notes that tribal government records need only be searched for in those instances where the subject property is located on or near tribal-owned lands.While tribal hazardous waste sites are included in the California Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC)Envirostor”database,only some are listed and they are not identified in order to maintain the privacy of the tribe(s)and their lands,according to DTSC.See Envirostor database described below)for more information,or visit:https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Source Agency: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 01 Jun 2018 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the Environmental Information Center for US EPA Region 9 at 866)372-9378 or via e- mail at r9.info@epa.gov. State EnviroStor Database (ENVIROSTOR, formerly SMBRPD): The EnviroStor database,maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC),replaces the former Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program SMBRP)database CalSites).EnviroStor identifies sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further as well as hazardous waste treatment,storage, disposal or transfer facilities TSDTF).The EnviroStor data disclosed in this Report includes those sites identified in the EnviroStor Cleanup Sites database as well as those listed in the EnviroStor Permitted and Corrective Action Facilities database download. Among the site types included in EnviroStor database are State Response Sites,generally high-priority and high potential risk confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation;Voluntary Cleanup Sites with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases where DTSC has been asked to oversee evaluation,investigation,and/or cleanup activities;and Evaluation sites with suspected but unconfirmed contamination.DTSC cautions that the EnviroStor database does not include ALL contaminated sites, permitted transportable treatment units,hazardous waste generators/transporters,or former methamphetamine meth)labs.This database also does not include information on sites where DTSC has made a No Action Required"determination,as these sites had assessments that revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Source Agency: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 09 Sep 2021 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA Environmental Protection Agency,Department of Toxic Substances Control, 916)323-3400. State List of Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup (SLIC): The Spills,Leaks,Investigations Cleanup SLIC)Program,administered by the California Water Resources Control Board,is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills,leaks,and similar discharges.Sites identified by the SLIC program are now listed in the GeoTracker database as Cleanup Program Sites”.The program oversees soil and water investigations, corrective actions,and human health risk assessments at sites with current or historic unauthorized discharges,which have adversely affected or threaten to adversely affect waters of the state.The program covers all types of pollutants such as solvents, petroleum fuels,heavy metals,pesticides,etc)and all environments including surface water,groundwater,sediment,and soil). 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 39 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 The outcome of the SLIC program process may range from a No Further Action NFA)letter indicating cleanup is complete with no land-use restrictions,to the design and implementation of a remedial system.Sites in the SLIC program are generally small to medium-sized industrial sites with non-fuel contamination.Many of these sites are regulated under Site Cleanup Requirements, which are issued by the Regional Board.Site Cleanup Requirements generally mandate a time schedule for specific tasks that must be performed by the responsible party(ies)to investigate and cleanup the site.Statutory authority for the program is derived from the California Water Code,Division 7,Section 13304.Guidelines for site investigation and remediation are promulgated in State Board Resolution No.92-49 entitled Policies and Procedures. Source Agency: California Water Resources Control Board. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 02 Sep 2021 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA State Water Resources Control Board,Underground Storage Tank Program, 916)341-5808. Solid Waste Landfill Facilities (SWIS): The Solid Waste Information System is maintained by California's Integrated Waste Management Board.This system tracks known landfills.Sites on this list are often reported as unlocatable"because the site address information on the state list is frequently insufficient for precise location landfills are typically distant from population centers,in undeveloped or rural areas where there are no street names or address numbers). Source Agency: California Integrated Waste Management Board. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 22 Sep 2021 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA State Integrated Waste Management Board,916)341-6320. State List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST): California's Water Resources Control Board,under its Underground Storage Tank Program,maintains a list of all underground storage tanks which have been reported as having released contaminants.Formerly identified as a standalone database called the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System LUSTIS),these sites are now identified as LUST Cleanup Sites”in the GeoTracker database. Source Agency: California Water Resources Control Board. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 02 Sep 2021 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA State Water Resources Control Board,Underground Storage Tank Program, 916)341-5808. EnviroStor Site With Deed Restriction Or Other Controls (CONTROLS) California law requires that the Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC)notify the planning and building departments of all local governments of any recorded land use restriction Deed Restriction").The DTSC maintains a database called EnviroStor"that lists all deed restrictions,including street addresses or the equivalent description of location.According to DTSC, this database may not include all deed restrictions and other land use controls that exist at the current time. Source Agency: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Search Distance Used: 0.5 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 31 Aug 2021 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA Environmental Protection Agency,Department of Toxic Substances Control, 916)323-3400. Sites of Potential Generators of Hazardous Materials (RCRA GEN): Small scale and large scale generators GEN)are included in this list,as required under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRA).This list is maintained by the Federal EPA of facilities that generate hazardous substances.Depending on the quantity,they will be listed as small or large.Sites on this list are not necessarily contaminated,but they are tracked because they deal with hazardous substances on the site.RCRA is a federal law that governs how hazardous substances are produced, transported,stored,and disposed of. Source Agency: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Search Distance Used: 0.125 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 08 Jan 2020 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the Environmental Information Center for US EPA Region 9 at 866)372-9378 or via e- mail at r9.info@epa.gov. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS, National Response Center): The National Response Center NRC)is the sole federal point of contact for reporting environmental hazard spills.The NRC operates 24 hours a day,7 days a week,365 days a year.The National Response System NRS)is the government's mechanism for emergency response to discharges of oil and the release of chemicals into the navigable waters or environment of the United 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 40 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 States and its territories.Initially,this system focused on oil spills and selected hazardous polluting substances discharged into the environment.It has since been expanded by other legislation to include hazardous substances and wastes released to all types of media.The ERNS database includes information about location,type,and severity of spills reported to the NRC. Source Agency: U.S.Coast Guard. Search Distance Used: 0.125 mile Database last checked by FANHD: WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the National Response Center,800)424-8802. State List of Underground Storage Tanks (UST): Part of the larger GeoTracker database,this list identifies permitted tanks storing hazardous substances which are substantially or totally beneath the surface of the ground.The list is maintained by California's Water Resources Control Board.When a tank on this list is discovered to be leaking,it may also appear on the LUST or RCRA COR list see above).Sites on the LUST or RCRA COR lists may not appear on the UST list if the tank has been removed and the case has been closed. Source Agency: California Water Resources Control Board. Search Distance Used: 0.125 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 31 Aug 2021 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA State Water Resources Control Board,Underground Storage Tank Program, 916)341-5808 State List of Historical Underground Storage Tanks (Hist-UST): The California State Water Resources Control Board keeps the Hazardous Substances Storage Container Information on file.This is a database of historical underground storage tanks that was kept until the late 1980's,but has been discontinued and is no longer updated. Source Agency: California Water Resources Control Board. Search Distance Used: 0.125 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 01 Jun 2018 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA State Water Resources Control Board,Underground Storage Tank Program, 916)341-5808 State Hazardous Waste Information Summary (HWIS): The Hazardous Waste Information Summary also called the Hazardous Waste Summary Report,and formerly the Tanner Report),is a database that summarizes the chemical data contained in manifests submitted to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC)by hazardous waste generators and facilities around the state.The volume of manifests submitted to the DTSC is typically 900,000 1,000,000 annually,representing approximately 450,000 500,000 shipments. Source Agency: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Search Distance Used: 0.125 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 28 Feb 2020 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the CA Environmental Protection Agency,Department of Toxic Substances Control, 916)323-3400. Sites Reported but Not Required for AAI Compliance As a courtesy to FANHD clients,the Commercial Environmental Screening Report also includes storage tank sites listed by state agencies that are not required by the AAI standard to be included in a government records search.These sites are listed in the following database: State List of Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST): This historic list tracks aboveground petroleum storage tanks of 10,000 gallons or more,with exceptions for certain uses e.g., agricultural).It was maintained by the state's Water Resources Control Board.When an aboveground tank is discovered to be leaking,it may also appear on the RCRA COR list see above).Sites on the RCRA COR list may not appear on the AST list if the tank has been removed and the case has been closed.NOTE:Effective January 1,2008 the Certified Unified Program Agencies CUPAs) at the local level are vested with the responsibility and authority to implement the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act APSA)which regulates ASTs. Source Agency: California Water Resources Control Board. Search Distance Used: 0.125 mile Database last checked by FANHD: 01 Jun 2018 WANT MORE INFORMATION? Contact the local responsible agency from the online directory at https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/pipeline-safety-and-cupa/certified-unified-program-agency-cupa/aboveground-petroleum- storage-act/. END OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT SECTION 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 41 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 See Terms and Conditions at end of this Report. 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 42 of 44 FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Environmental Screening Report For SAN LUIS OBISPO County Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 TERMS and CONDITIONS ACCEPTANCE OR USE OF THIS REPORT CONSTITUTES APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND LIMITATIONS STATED HEREIN. The Report Report")is subject to each of the following Terms and Conditions.Each Recipient defined below)of the Report agrees that the Report is subject to the following Terms and Conditions,and each Recipient agrees to be bound by such.Use of this Report by any Recipient constitutes acceptance of the Terms and Conditions to the Report.The Terms and Conditions below are incorporated by this reference into the Report.This Report is not an insurance policy. This Report is made for the real property specifically described in the Report the Property”)and solely for the transaction for which it was originally purchased Transaction").The Property shall not include any property beyond the boundaries of the real property described in the Report.The Property shall not include any structures whether located on the Property,or not),easements,or any right,title,interest,estate,or easement in any abutting streets,roads,alleys,lanes,ways,or waterways. IMPORTANT NOTICE:Transferor(s)and transferee(s)shall read the complete Report in its entirety before the close of escrow.A Signature Page"or Summary Pages"document may be included in the electronic delivery of this Report.Those documents do not replace the complete Report or remove the need to read the complete Report,and do not remove the requirement to disclose.The Signature Page and Summary Pages documents are subject to the Terms and Conditions of the complete Report. A.No Third Party Reliance on This Report.Only the transferor(s)and transferee(s),and their agents/brokers,if any,involved in the Transaction collectively,the Recipients")may use and rely on this Report and only after they have paid in full for the Report.While disclosures made on the Natural Hazard Disclosure Statement in the Report may indicate certain risks to the Property,the disclosures are only between the transferor,the transferor's agents,and the transferee, and shall not be used by any other party,including,but not limited to,insurance companies,lenders,or governmental agencies,for any purpose."Cal.Civil Code section 1103.2,subdivision g). B.Seller and Seller’s Agent’s Responsibility of Full Disclosure.Recipients are obligated to make disclosures,and always disclose material facts,that are within their actual knowledge. C.Scope of Report.This Report is limited to determining whether the Property is in those specified natural hazard zones and property tax districts,and in proximity to those specified environmental sites depending on the report product ordered),as defined in the Report.The Report is not a geologic report or a land survey and no site inspection has been made in producing the Report.FANHD makes no determination,expresses no opinion or view,and assumes no responsibility in this Report concerning the right,entitlement,or ability to develop or improve the Property.FANHD has no information concerning whether the Property can be developed or improved.No determination is made and no opinion is expressed,or intended,by this Report concerning structures or soils on or outside of the Property,including,without limitation,habitability of structures or the Property,suitability of the Property for construction or improvement,potential for soil settlement,drainage,soil subsidence,or other soil or site conditions.The Recipient(s)is advised to consult the local Planning Department to determine whether factors beyond the scope of this Report may limit the transferee(s)ability to use or improve the Property. The Report is not a title report,and no determination is made and no opinion is expressed,or intended,by this Report as to title to the Property or liens against the Property,recorded or otherwise,or whether the Property is comprised of legal lots in conformance with the California Subdivision Map Act or local ordinances.The Report is not a property inspection report,and no determination is made and no opinion is expressed,or intended,by this Report concerning architectural,structural,mechanical,engineering,or legal matters,or the marketability or value of the Property.FANHD has not conducted any testing or physical or visual examination or inspection of the Property,nor is this Report a substitute for any such testing,physical or visual examination,or inspection. D.Tax and Environmental Disclosures (if included in Report).No determination is made and no opinion is expressed,or intended,by the Report concerning the existence of property tax liabilities,or the existence of hazardous or toxic materials or substances,or any other defects,on,under,or in proximity to the Property, unless specifically described in the Report.FANHD's total liability for any error or omission in its disclosures relating to taxes and/or environmental matters shall be limited to actual proven damages not to exceed the price paid for this Report. E.FANHD Database Updates.Each database used in this Report is updated by the responsible agency at various intervals.Updates for a database are determined by the responsible agency and may be made at any time and without notice.FANHD maintains an update schedule and makes reasonable efforts to use updated information.For these reasons,FANHD reports information as of the date when the database was last updated by FANHD.That date is specified as the Database Date"for each database.The Tax Report discloses Mello Roos Community Facilities Districts,1915 Bond Act Assessments and PACE assessments documented in the county’s Fiscal Year 2021-2022 annual secured property tax roll.The Report may disclose PACE contracts where PACE taxes were first assessed or liens were recorded after the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 secured property tax roll,where recordation data is available to FANHD.To discover a PACE lien on the Property executed more recently,the buyer should read the preliminary title report and obtain and read all exceptions listed therein.Note that,in the title report,lien exceptions are named as recorded with the county;therefore,a PACE lien may be listed under a name that is not obvious. F.Statutory and Additional Disclosures, Advisories, and Local Addenda (if included in Report).No determination is made and no opinion is expressed,or intended,by this Report concerning the need to purchase earthquake or flood insurance for the Property.In preparing the Report,FANHD accurately reported on information contained in Government Records.FANHD reviewed and relied upon those Government Records specifically identified and described in the Report. FANHD has not reviewed or relied upon any Government Records that are not specifically identified in the Report.FANHD also has not reviewed any plat maps, survey maps,surveyor maps,assessor maps,assessor parcel maps,developer maps,or engineering maps,whether or not such maps have been recorded.No determination is made and no opinion is expressed,or intended,by the Report concerning any matters identified in Government Records that were not reviewed by FANHD.Local Addenda,where applicable,are included AS IS"as an accommodation to the local real estate board that provided the content;FANHD assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of any information included in the Local Addenda. G.FEMA Flood Determination Certificate (if accompanying the Report).No determination is made and no opinion is expressed,or intended,by the Report concerning the requirement for or cost of flood insurance on the Property.Recipient(s)understands that a lender may require flood insurance to secure its loan collateral independent of whether FEMA may require flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program on a federally backed mortgage.The FEMA Flood Determination Certificate Flood Certificate"),which may accompany the Report,is produced by a third-party expert certified by FEMA to provide Flood Certificates.FANHD assumes no liability for errors in that third-party flood determination. H.Changes to Government Record after Report Date.This Report is issued as of the Report Date identified in the Report.FANHD shall have no obligation to advise any Recipient of any information learned or obtained after the Report Date even if such information would modify or otherwise affect the Report. FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Terms and Conditions Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 43 of 44 Subsequent to FANHD acquisition of Government Records,changes may be made to said Government Records and FANHD is not responsible for advising the Recipients of any changes.FANHD will update this Report upon request and at no charge during the transaction process for which this Report was issued,but not to exceed one year from the date of the Report.Likewise,FANHD is not liable for any impact on the Property that any change to the Government Records may have. I.Government Record Sources.FANHD relies upon the Government Records specifically identified in the Report without conducting an independent investigation of their accuracy.FANHD assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the Government Records identified in the Report.FANHD makes no warranty or representation of any kind,express or implied,with respect to the Report.FANHD expressly disclaims and excludes any and all other express and implied warranties,including,without limitation,warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.The FANHD Report is AS IS". J.Limitation of FANHD's Liability 1. FANHD is not responsible for:• Any inaccuracies or incompleteness of the information in the Public Records.• Inaccurate address information provided for the Property.• Any other information not contained in the Public Records as of the Report Date.• Any information which would be disclosed by a physical inspection of the Property.• Any information known by one of the Parties.• The health or risk to humans or animals that may be associated with any of the disclosed hazards.• The costs of investigating or remediating any of the disclosed hazards. 2. FANHD’s total liability and responsibility to all Recipients collectively for any and all liabilities,causes of action,claim or claims,including but not limited to claims for breach of contract or negligence,shall be limited to the price paid for the Report.FANHD expressly disclaims any liability for Recipients indirect, incidental and/or consequential damages,including without limitation lost profits even if such damages are foreseeable.In the event of any error,omission or inaccuracy in the FANHD Report for which FANHD is liable,FANHD shall have no duty to defend or pay any attorneys’fees,costs or expenses incurred by the Recipients,or any of them.The Recipients,and each of them,expressly waive the benefits of California Civil Code Section 2778.FANHD has not conducted an independent investigation of the accuracy of the information provided by the Recipient.FANHD assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of information provided by the Recipient.FANHD shall be subrogated to all rights of any claiming party against anyone including,but not limited to,another party who had actual knowledge of a matter and failed to disclose it to the Recipients in writing prior to the close of escrow. K.Reporting of Risk Elements for Condominium Projects, Planned Unit Developments, and Other Properties with Common or Undivided Interests Common Interests”)Unless otherwise noted,this report is based solely on the real Property referenced by the Property’s Assessor's Parcel Number APN”). An APN whose boundary does not include all Common Interests associated with the parcel will generate a report which does not identify the natural hazards relating to the Common Interests that extend beyond the APN parcel boundary.Accordingly,it is imperative that you consult with the property’s homeowners association(s)to determine those risks. L.Governing Law.The Report shall be governed by,and construed in accordance with,the laws of the State of California. M.Small Claims or Arbitration.This provision constitutes an agreement to arbitrate disputes on an individual basis.Any party may bring an individual action in small claims court instead of pursuing arbitration,so long as the action remains in that court.All disputes and claims arising out of or relating to the Website,Customer Service,or any Report,must be resolved by binding arbitration.This agreement to arbitrate includes,but is not limited to,all disputes and claims between Company,transferor(s)and transferee(s)and claims that arose prior to purchase of the Report.This agreement to arbitrate applies to transferor(s)and transferee(s)successors in interest,assigns,heirs,spouses,and children.As noted above,a party may elect to bring an individual action in small claims court instead of arbitration,so long as the dispute falls within the jurisdictional requirements of small claims court. Any arbitration must take place on an individual basis.Company,transferor(s)and transferee(s)agree that they are waiving any right to a jury trial and to bring or participate in a class,representative,or private attorney general action,and further agree that the arbitrator lacks the power to grant relief affecting anyone other than the individual claimant.If a court decides that any of the provisions of this paragraph are invalid or unenforceable as to a particular claim or request for a particular remedy such as a request for public injunctive relief),then that claim or request for that remedy must be brought in court and all other claims and requests for remedies must be arbitrated in accordance with this agreement The arbitration is governed by the Consumer Arbitration Rules the AAA Rules")of the American Arbitration Association AAA"),as modified by this Agreement,and will be administered by the AAA.Company will pay all AAA filing,administration and arbitrator fees for any arbitration it initiates and for any arbitration initiated by another party for which the value of the claims is 75,000 or less,unless an arbitrator determines that the claims have been brought in bad faith or for an improper purpose,in which case the payment of AAA fees will be governed by the AAA Rules A COPY OF THESE RULES IS AVAILABLE FROM THE AAA'S WEB SITE AT WWW.ADR.ORG OR ON REQUEST FROM THE COMPANY.THE ARBITRATION AWARD MAY INCLUDE ATTORNEY'S FEES IF ALLOWED BY FEDERAL,STATE,OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW AND MAY BE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT IN ANY COURT OF PROPER JURISDICTION. The arbitration will take place in the same county in which the property covered by the Report is located.The Federal Arbitration Act will govern the interpretation,applicability and enforcement of this arbitration agreement.This arbitration agreement will survive the termination of the Report. N.Severability.If any provision of the Terms and Conditions to this Report is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason,then such provision shall be treated as severed from the remainder of the Terms and Conditions,and shall not affect the validity and enforceability of all of the other provisions of the Terms and Conditions. O.Other Agreements.This Report constitutes the entire,integrated agreement between FANHD and Recipients,and supersedes and replaces all prior statements, representations,negotiations,and agreements. END OF REPORT FANHD Commercial Resale Property Disclosure Reports Terms and Conditions Property Address:276 TANK FARM RD APN:See Addendum SAN LUIS OBISPO,SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY,CA 93401 Report Date:01/05/2022 Property")Report Number:2976335 2022 - First American Professional Real Estate Services, Inc. - 200 Commerce, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: (800) 527-0027 Fax: (800) 854-9625 Page 44 of 44 TANK FARM ROAD APN 076-383-001 APN 076-381-021 APN 076-351-061 APN 076-351-062 APN 076-383-002 APN 076-382-005 SANTA FE RDHOOVER AVETC TB1 TB2 TB3 TB4 TA1 TA2 S:\ GIS\1306_ SLOTF-EMC_ Work_Activities\1306.006_SLOTF_ 2016_Support- EMC\ArcMapDocuments\ 018_1306.006_Development_ and_ Conservation_Easement_Area( 24X36).mxd\3/ 8/2016EXHIBIT 3 DEVELOPMENT AREAS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON APN 076-382-005 APN 076-383-002 APN 076-351-062 APN 076-351-061 APN 076-383-001 APN 076-381-021 TANK FARM ROAD SANTA FE RDHOOVER AVETB1 TB2 TB3 TB4 TA1 TA2 TC !T- 8-0.5 Pb 1151 mg/kg SEE NOTE 2)!T- 2-0.5 Pb 801 mg/kg SEE NOTE 2)!T- 17-0.5 Pb 488 mg/kg SEE NOTE 2)S:\ GIS\ 1306_SLOTF-EMC_Work_Activities\ 1306.006_ SLOTF_2016_ Support-EMC\ArcMapDocuments\019B_ 1306. 006_Environmental_Impact_ Boundaries(24X36).mxd\ 3/8/2016EXHIBIT 4B ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT BOUNDARIES SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA EXPLANATION PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY SLO COUNTY PARCELS DEVELOPMENT AREA (VTTM 2015) LNAPL OCCURANCE EXTENT OF BTEX TPH IN SOIL > 1,000 mg/kg TPH IN SOIL > 100 mg/kg NOTES:1. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT REFLECT THE ANTICIPATED POST-REMEDIATION CONDITION. CONSEQUENTLY, IMPACTS SUCH AS ARSENIC IN SOIL & SURFACE HYDROCARBON EXPRESSION SHOWN IN THE RAP ARE NOT SHOWN HERE.2. LEAD IMPACTED SOIL REMAINS IN THE TANK RINGSSHOWNONTHIS EXHIBIT. THE RESOURCE AGENCIES DETERMINED THAT PRESERVATION OF TANK FARM ROAD SANTA FE RDHOOVER AVES:\ GIS\1306_ SLOTF-EMC_ Work_Activities\1306.006_SLOTF_ 2016_Support- EMC\ArcMapDocuments\ 018_1306.006_Development_ and_Conservation_Easement_ Area(24X36).mxd\3/ 8/2016EXHIBIT 3 DEVELOPMENT AREAS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA SAN LUIS OBISPO TANK FARM PREPARED FOR CHEVRON EMC SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA REFERENCE: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED: FEBRUARY 4, 2008. 0 200 400 FEET EXPLANATION PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY SLO COUNTY PARCELS DEVELOPABLE AREA CONSERVATION AREA DEVELOPABLE AREA WITH LIMITATIONS Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 Parcel 11 Parcel 10 Parcel 12 Parcel 9 Parcel 8 Parcel 7 Parcel 6 Parcel 13 Parcel 14 APN 076-381-021 APN 076- 381-021 APN 076- 381-021 APN 076- 381-021 APN 076- 382-005 APN 076- 382-005 APN 076- 382-005 APN 076-382-005APN 076-382-005 APN 076-351-062 APN 076-351-062 APN 076-383-002 APN 076-351-061 APN 076-383-001 Contains known contamination to be capped through the RAP work. Site will have a depth limit to excavation (4 feet) and may require special engineering controls for development (vapor barrier/etc).Developable Area with Limitations Developable Area No required remediation or restrictions. No restriction of depth of excavation and no special engineering controls required.Conservation Area Land Contains known contamination, which may or may not be altered in accordance with the RAP scope of work. Following remediation, land will not be developable for traditional uses and will have excavation limitations and require special authorization for any use other than agriculture or remediation monitoring and maintenance. This land is likely TANK FARM ROAD APN 076-383-001 APN 076-381-021 APN 076-351-061 APN 076-351-062 APN 076-383-002 APN 076-382-005 SANTA FE RDHOOVER AVEMW- 12 MW- 47 MW- 43 MW- 41 MW-40 MW- 39 MW- 38 MW- 37 MW- 35 MW- 29 MW- 27 MW- 26 MW- 19 MW- 12MW-11 MW-53SMW-53D MW- 48SMW-48DS:\GIS\ 1306_ SLOTF-EMC_Work_ Activities\1306.006_ SLOTF_2016_Support- EMC\ArcMapDocuments\021_1306. 006_GW_Monitoring_ Network( 24X36).mxd\ 3/8/ 2016EXPLANATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY SLO COUNTY PARCELS REFERENCE: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED: FEBRUARY THE LINK CONCEPTUAL PACKAGE FLEX / OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL/ R&D PARK 8 ACRES FLEX / OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL/ R&D PARK 6 ACRES FLEX / OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL/ R&D PARK FLEX / OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL/ R&D PARK HOUSING SITE AIRPORT RUNWAY MARGARITAHOUSINGPRADOROAD TANK FARM BROAD STREET HOUSING SITE 11 ACRES MIXED USE 600 TANK FARM 650 TANK FARM FUTURE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT DAMON GARCIA SPORTS FIELDS0’ 400’200’SCALE: 1” = 400’ (11” X17” SHEET) 800’ 600 TANK FARM SANTA FE CONNECTION TOSOUTHAIRPORT RPZNO BUILD LINEAIRPORT ZONE 3AIRPORT RPZNO BUILD LINERETAIL CLUBHOUSE RECHOUSINGSITEHOUSING SITE CENTRAL GREEN SPACECENTRAL GREEN SPACE SURFACE PARKING SURFACE PARKING SURFACE PARKING INDUSTRIALINDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL/R/ D PARK INDUSTRIAL/R/ D PARK INDUSTRIAL/ R/ D PARK OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE BASIN COMMUNITY FARM TANK FARM ROAD TANK FARM ROAD CONNECTION TO PRADO CONNECTION TO BROAD FLEX THE HANGERS THE DISTRICT THINK TANK FLEX PLAZA MIXED USE MIXED USE RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL MIXED USE 650 TANK FARMDAMON GARCIA SPORTS FIELDS 0’200’100’ SCALE: 1” = TANK FARM 9XXXX-XX-XX21 20 JULY 2021 SITE PLAN STUDIESTHINK TANK/ GREEN SPINE TANK FARM 10XXXX-XX-XX21 20 JULY 2021 SITE PLAN STUDIESTHE DISTRICT / PEDESTRIAN STREET WELL No. 1 WELL SERVICING CHEVRON OFFICES TO BE REMOVED AS PART OF REMEDIATION) WELL No. 2 WELL No. 3 TANK FARM ROAD APN 076-383-001 APN 076-381-021 APN 076-351-061 APN 076-351-062 APN 076-383-002 APN 076-382-005 SANTA FE RDHOOVER AVES:\GIS\1306_SLOTF- EMC_Work_Activities\ 1306. 006_SLOTF_ 2016_Support-EMC\ ArcMapDocuments\020_1306.006_Water_ Supply_Wells( 24x36).mxd\ 3/8/2016REFERENCE: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED: FEBRUARY 4, 2008.0 200 400 FEET EXHIBIT Phase I Environmental Site Assessment San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, California 2726.0003S100/CVRS ROUX APPENDIX I Property Photographs 1793.0017I000.100.PH–1– Photograph 2: View inside the Administrative Building Photograph 1: View of the Administrative Building in the northwestern portion of the Property. 1793.0017I000.100.PH–2– Photograph 4: View of the parking lot and water tank in front of the Administrative Building. Photograph 3: View of the two portable office trailers next to the Administrative Building. 1793.0017I000.100.PH–3– Photograph 6: View of a former tank berm and watering in the distance to help establish a habitat restoration area. Photograph 5: View showing the raised potion in the northwestern area where remediaton has been completed and the area raised with a soil cap. 1793.0017I000.100.PH–4– Photograph 8: Another view of the Equipment staging area on the south side of Tank Farm Road. Photograph 7: View of the Equipment staging area on the south side of Tank Farm Road. 1793.0017I000.100.PH–5– Photograph 10: Label closeup showing liquid is a hydrocarbon remediation medium for soil. Photograph 9: Drums and totes at the Equipment staging area on the south side of Tank Farm Road. 1793.0017I000.100.PH–6– Photograph 12: View of concrete lined former crude oil reservoir planned for filling. Photograph 11: View showing piles of imported base rock for filling and restoration of former reservoir locations south of Tank Farm Road. 1793.0017I000.100.PH–7– Photograph 14: View of the deep groundwater production well in the southeastern portion of the Site. Photograph 13: View looking at the western side of the Property showing elevation changes which are generally associated with the past tank farm use.