The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTank Testing4 4 T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post. Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 INVOICE #CC001085 TEST DATE: 4/29/98 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Out responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** ***** SITE DATA ***** KAISER SAND & GRAVEL KAISER SAND & GRAVEL SUBURBAN SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: CONTACT: PHONE #: PHONE #: ******* T A N K D A T A ******** TANK #1 TANK #2 TANK #3 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 FUEL LEVEL (IN) 73 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 GROUNDWATER NO INFLUENCE ON TANK BOTTOMS ***** COMMENT LINES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING/ TANK #1: DIESEL 2 WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECTFULLY TE,4ED & SUBMITTED, RO HANKENSON CA90-1169 ANDREW L. PROFT RATE: 0.01230 G.P.H. LOSS 15 START TIME:15:18:39088 CURRENT TIME:16:18:48:88 co: .69 Cl: -.88811 RATE: .81238 CPH LOSS —15 C00 1885.TST,I PTA, VERSION 1.28 15 30 45 TIME (MINUTES) Cr: 04/29/98 4 C i i. Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 INVOICE #CC000977 TEST DATE: 7/7/97 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN RD. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. ******* T A N K TANK DIAMETER (IN) VOLUME (GAL) FUEL LEVEL (IN) FUEL TYPE dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) D A T A TANK #1 95 10000 73 DIESEL 2 113.07 ***** SITE DATA ***** SP MILLING 131 SUBURBAN RD. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. ******** TANK #2 TANK #3 GROUNDWATER NO INFLUENCE ON TANK BOTTOMS ***** COMMENT LINES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING/MONITORED 1HRS/TESTED 2 HOURS TANK #1: DIESEL 2 RATE: 0.01400 G.P.H. GAIN WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECT ULLY TESTED & SUBMITTED, ROSER P, HANKENSON CA97-1169 ANDREW L. PROFT 15 -15 0 15 30 45 60 CCO00977, TST,1 TIME (MINUTES) 07/07/97 CC T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 INVOICE #CC000777 TEST DATE: 5/1/96 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING SURBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: PHONE #: ***** SITE DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING SURBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: PHONE #: ******* T A N K D A T A ******** TANK #1 TANK #2 TANK #3 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 FUEL LEVEL (IN) 62 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) 92.12 GROUNDWATER NO INFLUENCE ON TANK BOTTOMS ***** COMMENT LINES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING TANK #1: DIESEL 2 RATE: 0.01433 G.P.H. LOSS WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. ULLAGE PORTION TESTED TIGHT ALSO. RESPECTFULLY TESTED & SUBMITTED, WA4-p ROBERT P. HANKENSON CA97-1169 ANDREW L. PROFT 15 D Ln w z T- o Cl J J W - —10 TAB I START TIME:18:49:48:88 C8:-.88845 Ci:-.88816 RATE: —15 1 s 0 CC888777.TST,1 .81433 CPH LOSS CURRENT TIME:11:49:58:88 PTA, VERSION 1.28 15 30 TIME (MINUTES) 45 Cr: 85/81/9b WA CC T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 S05-966-9915 INVOICE #CC000599 TEST DATE: 07/11/95 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN ROAD P. 0. BOX 71 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: (805)543-8100 ***** SITE DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN ROAD P. 0. BOX 71 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: (805)543-8100 ******* T A N K D A T A ******** TANK NO.1 TANK NO.2 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 LENGTH (FT) 27.16 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 TYPE ST FUEL LEVEL (IN) 67 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) 122.21 GROUNDWATER BELOW TANK BOTTOMS ***** COWKENT LIMES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING MONITORED 1HR/ TESTED 3 HRS. TANK NO.3 TANK N0.4 TANK #1: DIESEL 2 RATE: .015829 G.P.H. LOSS WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECCTTFULLY SUBMITTED, ROOB�EERT' P. HANFtENSON CA97-1169 1 t 15 TANY I START TIME:15:02:00:00 CURRENT TIME:16:02:00:00 i ij 0 -.00006 -.00013 RATE: .01503 GPH LOSS PTA, VERSION 1.20 -15 1- 1 0 CC808599.TST,2 15 �) 3,1 TIME (MINUTES) Cr: i6l all 0 SOL 3 45 60 07/11/95 10 2 En w w a� w 0 r 0 IJ..I CC F- n w z —5 w D z TANE START TIME:15:02:00:00 CURRENT TIME:16.02:00: —10 L I 0 CCO00599.TST,2 Cr: PTA, VERSION 1.20 —` SOL S 15 30 TIME (MINUTES) 45 60 87/11/95 INVOICE #CC000311 TEST DATE: 04/27/94 CCTT - CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTING P. O. BOX 2155 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93120 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT ----------------------------- ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: COMPLIANCE TESTING ***** SITE DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: ***** COMMENT LINES ***** The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets the current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. TANK #1: DIESEL FUEL 2 TYPE: STEEL TANNK TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, wAk? 000� ROBERT P. HANKENSON CA91-1169 RATE: .028220 G.P.H. LOSS ******* T A N K D A T A TANK NO. TANK NO. 1 2 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 LENGTH (FT) 27.16 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 TYPE ST FUEL LEVEL (IN) 72 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) 114.82 CALIBRATION ROD DISTANCE 1 10.65625 2 26.95313 3 41.93750 4 56.93750 5 74.93750 TANK NO. TANK NO. 3 4 ******* C U S T O M E R D A T A******** JOB NUMBER : 000311 CUSTOMER (COMPANY NAME) : SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING CUSTOMER CONTACT(LAST, FIRST): LOGAN, DAVE ADDRESS - LINE 1 131 SUBURBAN ADDRESS - LINE 2 CITY, STATE SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA ZIP CODE (XXXXX-XXXX) PHONE NUMBER (XXX)XXX-XXXX ******* C O M M E N T L I N E S******* COMPLIANCE TESTING ******* S I T E D A T A******** SITE NAME (COMPANY NAME) SITE CONTACT(LAST, FIRST) ADDRESS - LINE 1 ADDRESS - LINE 2 CITY, STATE ZIP CODE (XXXXX-XXXX) PHONE NUMBER (XXX)XXX-XXXX GROUND WATER LEVEL (FT) NUMBER OF TANKS LENGTH OF PRE -TEST (MIN) LENGTH OF TEST (MIN) : SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING : LOGAN, DAVE : 131 SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA : BELOW TANK BOTTOM : 30 : 180 15 10 Cr: START TIME:15:25:18:88 co: .00018 C1:-.88825 RATE: .02022 OPH LOSS -15 < CC888311.TST,1 CURRENT TIME:16:25:18:08 PTA, VERSION 1.20 15 30 45 TIME (MINUTES) 04/27/94 60 r- 0 w x D w a_ w w c.D z c� 10 I 09 -10 0 START TIME:15:25:10:00 CURRENT TIME:16:25:10: PTA, VERSION 1.20 15 30 4.5 SOL 2 CCO00311.TST,1 TIME (MINUTES) 04/27/94 C C T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 March 27, 1992 ! lr'. ,iirrl F et" llr; S. P, Milling Company P. 0, Box 71 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 ubjeGt; UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE PRECISION TANK TEST [year Mr. Pettius 805-966-9915 The purpose of this report is to transmit the results from Central Coast Tank Testing's precision test of the underground storage tank at Summit Road, San Luis Obispo, California performed on Friday, March 27, 1992, BACKGROUND The system used to perform the test is the Horner "Ezy-Chek" Tank Testing System. This system meets or exceeds the NFPA V329-87 and USEPA-88 guidelines. These guidelines are the basis of al mandated requirements at the state, aunty or local agency levels. The system 1s capable of detecting a product volume variance rate of 0.05 gallons per hour with 95% confidence of 0.10 gallons per hour, The product volume variance rate 1s an equipment tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate, Central Coast Tank Testing assumes no responsibility for product leakage, Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date tested, according to state compliance guidelines, and within the accuracy tolerance of the Horner Testing System. Groundwater was not considered for the testing. The variables in testing; such as tank end deformation, entrapped vapor, evaporation, and temperature, are noted on the individual data sheets, if encountered. Testing and preparation comments are also noted. RESULTS Tank 1-10,000 gallon diesel system . This system was tested over a period of three hours and tested light 1n compliena. The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate. The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature produces a product volume variance rate of +0.020 gallons per hoar. AaWlionally, the 95Z Gonll*nce intervols (-0. 014, +0. 054) pra*wW were within the new USEPA testing criteria limits The fueling system was suction, Res submitted e�, Robert P. Hankenson CENTRAL COAST TANK TEST' '). SANTA BARBARA, CA SITE AND TESTING INFORMATivN PAGE 1 OF 2 DATE 3/27/92 TEST CLIENT Southern Pacific Milling ADDRESS 141 Surhurhan CITY San Luis Obispo, CA TEST LEVEL ILLUSTRATION TEST LEVEL ILLUSTRATION CONTACT PERSON Jim P./Steve Z. OPERATORS RPH CA91-1169 OTHER COMMENTS TANK* 1 Diesel A) Tank Bottom - Grade 153 B) Tank Top - Grade 5B C) Tank Diameter 95 D) Test. Level from grade 5 E) In Tank Water Depth c7 F) Groundwater Influence 0 G) Test Level - Tank Bottom 158 HydrostaticPressure Top/Bottom 2,0/4.9 TANK# A) Tank Bottom - Grade B) Tank Top - Grade C) Tank Diameter D) Test Level above grade E) In Tank Water Depth F) Groundwater Influence G) Test. Level - Tank Bottom HydrostaticPressure Tap/Bottom CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTI ). SANTA BARBARA, CA SITE AND TESTING INFORMATevN Tank* Tank# 1 Actual Capacity Actual Capacity 10356 Overflood Overflood is Test Capacity Test Capacity 10371 product ro uci?, Diesel Observed Temp Observed Temp Observed (iravit-y Observed Gravity Corrected Gravity Corrected Gravity Temp Coefficient Temp Coefficient 0,000455 Delivery Time Delivery Time Thurs prior Day Tipp Off Time TANK LAYOUT Load Area Building Diesel Tank MONITORING & TESTIN6 COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS Additional site preparation. Normal set up procedure, Suction system, PAGE 2 OF 2 PREPARATION COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS AMBIENT TEMP BAROMETER START END 1 ST HR END 2ND HR END 3TH HR END 4TH HR END 5TH HR END 6TH HR IEATHER CONDITIONS vercast/Unstable etween rains CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTI ' SANTA BARBARA. CA I ) PAGE 1 DATASHEET TANK} i 6PH CALCULAT WNS (INTERVAL X INT/HR) PRODUCT TIME INT OV s 1 TCVw 1 NV=1 DVGPH=1 TCVGPH=1 NVGPH= I MEANOPH STDDEV Diesel TEST VOLUME 1 -0,0084 -0,0142 0.0058 -0.202 -0,340 0.138 10371 2 -0,0014 -0,0047 0,0033 -0,034 -0.113 0,080 COEFFICIENT 3 0.0014 -0,0094 0.0108 0.034 -0.227 0,260 0,000455 4 -0,0056 -0,0142 0,0086 -0,134 -0,340 0.205 LEVEL 5 -0.0014 0,0142 -0,0156 -0,034 0,340 -0,373 0,0014 6 -0,0014 -0,0236 0,0222 -0,034 -0,566 0.533 7"EMP* 7 -0.0042 0.0094 -0.0136 -0,101 0,227 -0,327 4.719 8 -0.0028 0,0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0.000 -0,067 9 -0.0042 0.0000 -0.0042 -0.101 0,000 -0.101 10 -0,0028 0,0047 -0,0075 -0,067 0,113 -0.180 0,017 0,281 DATA ANALYSIS 11 -0,0014 0.0047 --0.0061 -0.034 0,113 -0,147 -0,012 0.282 12 -0,0042 -0,0047 0,0005 -0,101 -0,113 0,012 -0,019 0,280 VOLUME CH6 13 -0,0056 -0.0047 -0,0009 -0,134 -0,113 -0,021 -0,047 0.262 -0.022 9ph 14 -0.0028 0k047 -010075 -0,067 0,113 -0.180 -0,085 0,249 TEMP VOL CH6 15 -0,0042 -0,0094 0,0052 -0,101 -0,227 0,126 -0,035 0.235 -0.042 9ph 16 -0,0014 -0,0094 0,0080 -0.034 -0.227 0,193 -0,069 0.154 VARIANCE RATE 17 -0,0028 0,0094 -0,0122 -0,067 0,227 -0.294 -0.066 0,148 +0.020 gph 18 -0.0028 -0,0236 0,0208 -0.067 -0,566 0,499 -0.009 0.232 95X CONFIDENCE 19 -0,0042 0,0047 -0,0089 -0.101 0.113 -0,214 -0.021 0.240 (-0.014.+0.054) 20 -0,0056 0,0094 -0,0150 -0.134 0.227 -0.361 -0.039 0,259 Tight in Compliance -0.0028 -0,0094 0,0066 -0,067 -0.227 0.159 -0,008 0.263 22 -0.0014 -0,0047 0,0033 -0.034 -0.113 0.080 -0,001 0.264 23 0,0000 0,0094 -0,0094 0.000 0,227 -0.227 -0,022 0.274 24 0,0000 -0.0142 0,0142 0.000 -0,340 0.340 0.030 0,289 25 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0,034 0,000 -0,034 0,014 0,288 26 -0,0056 -0.0047 -0,0009 -0,134 -0.113 -0.021 -0.007 0,281 27 -0,0042 -0,0094 0,0052 -0.101 -0.227 0,126 0,035 0.264 28 -0,0028 0.0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0.000 -0.067 -0,022 0.209 29 -0,0014 -0,0047 0,0033 -0,034 -011 13 0.080 0,007 0,199 30 -0.0014 -0,0094 0,0080 -0,034 -0.227 0,193 0,063 0,158 31 -0.0028 0,0047 -0,0075 -0.067 0.113 -0,180 0.029 0,171 32 -0,0028 -0.0047 0,0019 -0.067 -0,113 0.046 0.026 0.170 33 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0,048 0.146 34 0,0000 -0,0047 0,0047 0.000 -0,113 0.113 0,026 0,109 35 -0,0028 0,0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0.000 -0.067 0.022 0.111 36 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0.034 0.000 -0,034 0,021 0,112 37 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0.113 0.080 0,016 0,108 38 -0,0028 0,0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0,000 -0.067 0.016 0,108 39 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0.113 0.000 0,016 0,108 40 -0.0014 0,0000 -0.0014 -0,034 0,000 -0.034 -0,006 0,089 41 -0.0014 0.0047 -0,0061 -0.034 0.113 -0.147 -0.003 0,082 42 -0,0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0.034 0,000 -0.034 -0,011 0,080 43 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0.034 0.000 -0,034 -0,014 0.081 44 -0.0014 0.0000 -0.0014 -0.034 0,000 -0,034 -0,029 0,067 45 0.0000 0,0047 -0.0047 0.000 0.113 -0.113 -0,034 0,071 46 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0,113 0.080 -0.022 0.080 47 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0.034 0.000 -0.034 -0,034 0,071 CtTT 46 0.00' 0.0047 -0.0047 0.000 1113 -0.113 -0,038 0.075 DATASHEET 49 0,00(jv 0.0000 0.0000 0,000 V.000 0.000 -0.046 0.065 TANK*1 50 0,0000 -0.0047 0,0047 0,000 -0113 0.113 -01031 0,082 CONTINUED 51 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,000 0.000 01000 -0,017 0.072 PAGE 2 52 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,000 0.000 0.000 -0,013 0.072 53 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0,113 0,080 -0.002 0.077 54 0,0000 -0.0047 0.0047 01000 -0.113 0,113 0,013 0.084 55 0,0000 -0.0047 0.0047 0,000 -0,113 0,113 0,035 0,077 56 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -011 13 0.080 0,035 0,077 57 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0,113 0.080 0,047 0,074 56 -04014 -0.0047 0,0033 -0,034 4),113 ' 0,080 0,066 0,048 59 0,0000 -0,0047 0.0047 0,000 -0.113 0.113 0.077 0,044 60 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0.034 -0,113 0.080 0,074 0.042 -0.022 -0.042 0.020 StdDev DAI'A ANALYSIS VOLUME CH6 -0.022 qph TEMP VOL CH6 -0.042 gph VARIANCE RATE +0.020 gph 95X CONFIDENCE (-0.014,+0.054) Tight in Compliance CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTI STATISTICAL REVIEW TANK ;1 X 1 : QV6PH* 1 Mean; Std, Dev.: Std, Error; Variance: Coef, Var.: Count: -,023 1.011004 3,647E-4 -84.405 24 Minimum; Maximum: Ran e: Sum: Surn S uared: * Missing: 1067 1 -543 1021 0 t 959: 95%, Lower: 959 Upper: t 999,": 997o' Lower: 99A Upper: 1.006 -1031 -,015 .011 -1034 -1012 * < loth S. 10th 9: 25th :4: 50th 8: 75th Fo: 90th Fo: 1 -,034 -,034 -,034 0 0 * 90th 9: Mode: Geo, Mean: Har, Mean; Kurtosis; Skewness: 0 -,034 • is -,793 -,024 X2: TCV6PH* 1 Mean; Std, Dev,: Std, Error: Variance: Coef, Var.: Count: -.042 .08 .016 .006 -189,584 124 Minimum; MaKirnum: Range: Sum: Sum Squared- * Missin : -,1 13 ,1 13 .226 -1,017 192 0 t 959: 95T, Lower: 95♦r6 Upper: t 992: 992 Lower; 992 Upper: 1.034 -,076 -.008 1046 L 1 088 1 .004 * < 1 Qth 2: 10th R: 25th A: 50th 9: 75th 9: 90th 9: Q 1 -.1 13 1-1113 1-057 Q 1.113 * > 90th fib: Mode: Geo. Mean: Har, Mean: Kurtosis: Skewness: 0 -.113 is Is -,739 1.66 X-%: NV6PH01 Mean: Std. Dev.:Error: ariance: Coef. Var.: Count: 02 .081 .016 ,007 402,127 24 Mirtimum: Maximum: Ran e: Sum ; Sum Squared: * Missing: -,147 1.113 .26 .482 ,16 0 L 999: 9914 Lower: 999 Upper! Lower:Upper: 034 -1014 .054 1046 -1026 7.066 * < IOth 9: 1Oth l: 25th R; 50th 9: 75th S; 90th 9: 1 -,1 13 -,034 .04 .08 1.113 * > 90th A: Mode; Geo. Mean: Har, Mean: Kurtosis: Skewness: tj 1 O0 16 19 -,964 1 -,5 CIENTRAL COAST TANK TESTY 1 SANTA BARBARA. CA PA )1 DATA L06/READING' TANK* 1 TANK #1 TIME INT LEVEL TEMP COMMENTS PRODUCT 55 1,015 Diesel 15 1 49 1.012 2 48 1,011 Truck in area 20 3 49 1.009 4 45 1.006 Truck out of area 25 5 44 1,009 6 43 1.004 Truck near area 30 7 40 1,006 8 100/98 1,006 35 9 95 1.006 10 93 1,007 40 11 92 1,008 -- - - 12 89 1.007 45 13 85 1.006 14 83 1.007 50 15 80 11005 16 79 1.003 55 17 77 1,005 18 75 1.000 0 19 72 1,001 Truck: near area 20 68 1,003 5 21 66 1,001 22 65 1.000 10 23 65 1,002 24 65 0,999 15 25 64 0,999 26 60 0.998 20 27 57 0.996 28 55 0,996 25 29 54 0,995 30 53 0,993 30 31 51 0,994 32 49 0,993 35 33 49 0,993 34 49 0,992 40 35 47 0,992 36 46 0,992 45 37 45 0,991 38 43 0.991 50 39 42 0,990 40 41 0,990 55 41 40 0,991 42 39 0,991 0 43 38 0,991 44 37 0,991 5 45 37 0,992 46 36 0,991 10 47 35 0.991 CCTT DATA L06. CONTINUED PAGE 2 48 15 49 50 20 51 52 25 53 35 ')0 ,992 35 0.992 35 0.991 35 0,991 35 0.991 34 0,990 1.989 1,988 1,987 ,986 .985 .984 .983 MAY 31 '21 09:58 COPY°CAT- , P.2/10 1 T Cnntrel Coyest Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155. Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 May 10, 1991 Mr, J I m Pettus Southern Pacific Milling Co, P,0.Box 71 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Subject: UNDERGROUND FUEL_ STORAGE PRECISION TANK TESTS SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LOCATIONS Dear Sir:. The purpose of this report is to transmit the results from Central Coast Tank Tasting's precision tests of the underground storage tanks at your facilities located In Santa Margarita and ,San Luis Obispo, California concluded on Friday, May 10. 1991. BACKGROUND The system used to perform the test 1s the Horner "Ezy-Ch8V Tank Testing System, This w*stern meets or exceeds the NFPA &329-67 and USEPA-88 guidelines, These guidelines are the basis of all mandated requirements at the state, county or local agency levels, The system is capable of detecting a product volume variance rate of 0.05 gallons per hour with 95% confidence of 0.10 gallons per hour. The product volume variance rate is an equipment tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate, Central Coast Tank Testing assumes no responsibility for product leakage, Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date tested, according to state compliance guidelines, and within the accuracy tolerance of the Horner Testing System. Groundwater was not considered for the testing, The variables in testing; such as tank end deformation, entrapped vapor, evaporation, and temperature, are noted on the individual data sheets, If ancountered, Testing and preparation comments are also noted; RESULTS Santa Margarita Location Tank 1-10,000 gallon diesel system. This system test was performed over a period of two hours and tested tlo/it la comollance The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate, The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature, produces an improving product volume variance rate of liner. AaWitianally� the 05Ar awflaMw intervals l - 0.062, f 0 009) oreoMvd were wiffila the 11 0A craferls limits MAY 31 '91 09:59 COPY°CAT P.3/10 TIM 2-20,000 gallon MIMI Wstem, TrIIS system test was perrormed over a period or two hours and tested tight /a cmplla= The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate. The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature, prflduces an improving product volume variance rate of AaWflawally, tht 95Z awrftmr intervals t - 0. 0,74. + D. 0.0V vI*eAwwW rr+B # wtthlo thw asFRA criterla 1IarltS San Luis Obispo Looation Tank 1-10,000 gallon diesel system. This system test was performed over a period of two r►.ours and tasted trot /it pt/#&V. The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate, The volume chmnge, corrected for the influence of ternperature, produces an improving product volume variance rate of -0. A39 jw11ans per howl,. Aa Wopally, Iht 95.f vmAd ee fi7t0rV0/$ ( -A. pd4, --0 V I ) pra*vad were wPhIn the MAN criteria Ilinlls: RespGo�}tfully submitted, Robert p, HankGnson Central Coast Tank Testing 2 CCTTCentral Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155. Santa Barbara. CA 93120 May 26, 1990 Mr. Scott Kenyon Southern Pacific Milling Co. 3555 Vineyard Avenue Oxnard, CA 93030 Subject: UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE PRECISION TANK TESTS Dear Sir: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LOCATIONS JUN N Ll iUIrol,rji s ,90 805- s�,99 yp The purpose of this report is to transmit the results from Central Coast Tank Testing's precision tests of the underground storage tanks at your facilities located in Santa Margarita and San Luis Obispo, California concluded on Saturday, May 26, 1990. BACKGROUND The system used to perform the test is the Horner "Ezy-Chek" Tank Testing System. This system meets or exceeds the NFPA 0329-87 guidelines. These guidelines are the basis of all mandated requirements at the state, county or local agency levels. The system is e of detecting a product volume variance rate of 0.05 gallons per hour, The product volume variance rate is an equipment tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. Central Coast Tank Testing assumes no responsibility for product leakage. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date tested, according to state compliance guidelines, and within the accuracy tolerance of the Horner Testing System. Testing methodology is also included that meets the statistical review of the data collected, Groundwater was not considered for the testing. The variables in testing; such as tank end deformation, entrapped vapor, evaporation, and temperature, are noted on the individual data sheets, if encountered. Testing and preparation comments are also noted. Santa Margarita Location RESULTS Tank I - 10,000 gal Ion diesel system. This system test was performed over a period of two hours and tested 4911t in compliance. The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate. The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature, produces an improving product volume variance rate of -0 OJ to - 0- 0/.3 yre//an5 per hour. AaH111on811y ; t/ie 957Ar canfiai.�nce intervals 9r0dVC6e were within the na lli criteria limits 1 A LS EFL i�A AY5ANO & GRAVEL COMPANY A Subsidiary of Koppers Company, Inc, POST OFFICE BOX 580, PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 415/846-6800 April 27, 1989 Heather Paris County of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Health P. 0. Box 1489 San Luis Obispo, Ca 93406 Dear Heather: Enclosed for your review are the results of our underground tank tests for our Santa Margarita Plant (Facility #000152/1) and our San Luis Obispo Plant (Facility #000152/3). As we discussed on the telephone, I did not test the tank at the Atascadero Plant (Facility #000152/2) since we are removing the tank within the next two weeks. Very truly yours, KAISER SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY Lawrence W. Appleton Manager of Engineering LWA:mb Enclosure CCTTContra[ Coast Tanis Testing Post Office Box E155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 April 24. 19,g9 Ir arrf Appleton Kaiser Sand & Gravel r Box 580 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Sub3ect: UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE PRECISION TANK TESTS Dear MI r AoWeton -he purpoSe of this reprlrt 'IS to ?ran5m; T`Ir re5iiit; morn Central - +;rl. • � �oa�t "art �: , e-�• , � � ., preelsi0r: test o} the undery^ r at your company locations in Sar:'.a : '2r far ita : end :;an Lu1s !_Irlgpn perfnrmalj on 'rva�r:?,08y and Sat.lrr�a,�, Apr11 1 9 & 22. 1 u89 BACKGROUND Toe system usea 11 pert :l l r, ,t _ � IF Hor : lei in �/-I` r: T � C•y -} � . - "E� 'a, .e_t, cM Stem meets qr e.XCeedc the NFr'A �`G-'•, nl_!,r-alines Trlc•• :111,.11o".nrS ,are thF, 11_~tii} Of all roaridated requirements at the state., cour:ty nr ;Oc t agency - iir Sy�,'•� l i= ; 3pd0;e Uf detecect �g a pro 4 �1N., ri^r, 1 nT r, .�C 1 ting duC, Y!�. mp �;'.ji :��..re .."d�.e _ ., i � ,-. gF,r rate 1_ n_r?trlr ',N3 permi,=lble !eaK yie i_rr-It.r- ai 13rlk e.c iinq dS'�I;,IeS r10 r? HcnS':G'll''v" for product l �ka(e. cur respcn,- :lt`y �',n�'; 0r,l.y `?nkc as tight nr not tight �5 of the date tectori ar,:Ord)ng to y tP ?nm:�''°nCe j I' c 1 a.r e, rl,,` anL1 Yvltn;n the aecuraev tolerance of the riorner-e,ting ' ySTenl Testlna meuncluOlugv 1, also •!�l N.� l `.. _♦ ,a_ fir,4 _ ♦._ _� _ tree a� rr�v._..., :��r �-. _ _��', v� ,-.� �-± �ICOUruWdter was nUi considered for trle testlriq The ar laoll` ir, iCj?;nub _li ri y" '.arlk end 1�*�rrrlatly Nr.+ryVLvli `>apor, evaporatio �(1-ata _.neet=, .f encountered-estlna and preparation =_loft! en+ are so _tic RESULTS Tank 1 - ' r r - = = _ - y7 �' frl;, =.a.._ argar .a, _ w,,= c2_• U`:',�r _ -, r lOd Ali tW:=' hour_ .end te.steC light. Tr:O F• 1r _c?.�tl_ nr PccljirP in� 11ed *i_i !�F _ :c,T �?n'I 17i r nr .r.e'tP,_4„1 one voiume cnan. e Te rI, u ,r 9 ae, r r c G for .Ile in. lue I_r C, n �lerdt✓ �IrOauces a r _, ; ; c t , l r: i e '; '" ' •; -. _ ' e - 0.0210 - 0.04 gallons per hour. 4ddilion8lly, b statistical qualify review of the data collected, indicated a positive correlatioi between volume change and the lemperature trend. The 95$ confidence inter va, produced was within the new EPA limits The line test was observed with Me .system test. The product line was exposet, and could be visually inspected. r� Tank 2 - ''0,000 �a??url d+e'e? :✓ste r,� fa M _- _ j _Url. ar '71�1 ..J! �J _✓_ _. tti �_ .._.ey _ _ nerioul nt two hpUrs and teste'� light. The nvdrn staTic. Ares: -Jiro 9r,Dl i �" ._, fl'r _ -T-:6 �I ,rr� trle resting was adequate Ieripe!-ature pl('uue pllal ennen,, vva,-� irle _I i`v a. 2rnl.PdurP ThP. n(jtt)M tWalVo lfl('iluc Was �':trrrYej• W:• inn `rn�.'!.`1.E1 ;n tF, I for the ir- }.tltn gallons per hour collected, indicated temperature trend. £PA lim its. Additionally, a statistical quality review of the datz a positive correlation between volume change and lh6 The 95.5 confidence interval produced was within the new All lines could be visually observed and were tight. The product line was shut Off at the gale valve located on top of the tank. The line run is above 9rounc from this valve. Tank 3 - 10,000 gal?c!n d1esr',i .ste;rl '' :;ar _uis uGispoi. Thi; y_,tem was tested n�er a Deriod r� tW,- Yld te`,.ted h1 t= j� rtir.�c +;,h i�, - n' ✓.� 1.� + j light T✓.._ _ r! __�71i"., 3pr i`�d the `'��j,?r"? l:l.:r7r!'j Way CIUCUI_iOlr TerrlDeratlirr arlo GC.'z,erver vnil_ime N/er e Lrenoir!Q together' thrnughn(.,T tre tpc-ung Ti`I�.' ��a`,,..ai ,til•i;irl�••a+;.�F, -,F;. .a.`.i.,i� ,gas .ri-I�ii ..:-ril7 —war:., g- '::�n!�P_,, :I_,r `�.•.�u tiir trlb ri'�'_iGl'Il_„ li? tr�i.'rrJ.0 C [lrill]!�(�t?c-rod! _ilt %nllimo �:�r O``vC ]'e i l t 0.04 gallons per hour. Additionally, a statistical quality review of the data collected, indicated a positive correlation between volume change and 111E temperature trend The 959 confidence interval pr:')duced was within the neM EPA limits The line test was observed with the system test. Th.,. product line was exposes and could be visually inspected. The vent line was exposed also and the fil, riser had been replaced. WESTERN r ^ r TANK TECHNOLOGY STORAGE SYSTEM SERVICES W.T.T. Precision Tank Testing Larry A ppe! ton F_O_ Box 580 G Pleasonton CA 94566 Re: - Tank System Test, March 4, 5 and 6, 1989 At Santa Margarita and San Luis Obispo locations F`144 WR G 41989 Dear Mr. Appelton: �rlISe-(2 �f to j --k (�,0Au'rc. � The tank systems tested at this location are identified as follows: T:.'°; item a 1 a2 a3 10,000 gal. Diesel 20,000 gal. Diesel 10.000 gal. Diesel The National Fire Protection Association's criteria for a tight tank system is a system with a rate of leak less than + .050 gal/hr. for tank systems 12,500 gallons or less. These are calculated, mathematical tolerance only and are not meant to indicate the permission of any leak. During the stand -pipe test procedure the liquid hydrostatic pressure _ applied to the underground tank system is generally two to three times greater than normal liquid storage pressures. The increase in hydrostatic pressure will amplify the indicated rate of leak accordingly. Prior to -and after testing the tank bottoms were checked for water through the fill pipes, no measurable amounts were recorded. 1) Santa Margarita location. Tank system 1 showed a rate of leak at -.210 gph. Tank system 81 Failed. Tank -system 2 showed a rate of leak at -1.064 gph. Tank system 82 failed. 2) San Luis Obispo Location Tank system 3 showed a rate of leak at -.198 gph. Tank system a3 failed. From v! a office of Jeff Pickard, 3100 Ramona, Atescadero, CA 93422 [805) 461-3253 n N 9 � � m tln p m tj O �•3 v 8 � _ T e mpit •• v �n x sm O 62 o Q a CD W dr m 3 m F. m m o ^n n a .0 T �o —. > ,° D C7 w 3 v 3 3 5-1 GZ ryry s D m m i D D� n v O o `� m G) m x _ ° ' D m Z o L m o Z n ° C) � m � co e rn c� c� c o• a m F m Iv y�• iI II $ mZ mA �A nm C•> T c700 P c m 'Elz -co 4 Q IOD _6 m G7 m ir sxr ■ � Q N n T r = u 3 c m OD m 0 c 3.3 m CA o m a It M m ° N c n g 3 R C) g o o o m o 0m o D r 3 m m H o P E a o o m v z x g m v 'mom^ n L7 f C7 ' w w o n 0 m v v C r' m m C Cn ❑ m C) Z 5 G Cl)C � N . ❑ N v I 2 Cn •-•I m N O o_ n n O Z i n x o m m c a 7C . x° v o ° X m m 3' p o g a�iD 1 Z El° v o F 7C m En m v ocn a 0 Z 3 m m D cn a i = m P CD O� m W m Cn m v a o m Z m P ' ❑ 3 (n m x ryI Z = r m F Z L7 T O m o o' p F � 1 a 0 c o m ORO m >g .c nm 3 o Q c = n m c c c :F mCi ° ° 0 5 m c C1m Ca N m ' 0 -' .T 7O _ �] m 3 21 EL m OT 7471 X . cn m �V1 O D : v cn O Z p ❑ . s � C � S3 m El sy g Q) K m � T 11 -4 AV m f T d O 3 s •- m a� Y pt 1, m v A � - o � m � mm n �s m 3 0 o •�• � D N rm 71 z v ° m a = � n 4 O `Tl � �ry V � m 0 t C F- 1 �r °:, � � o �,, s : • ; -• � _ ']ram U Q T' 6 -7 AkZ7 n•o . _ q py ` 7• ..- a � 4 � t T. r � k �Y R IN •LIN 6A C) 'A T I�v�y! C, IV A 'vIOLgT QD � e t �.. � e ► e � e i � 1 � 1 � Ci 5 op OO �,a t 'w %A c ® s �Q lN��yJ 1 �Q a•• --•C m 4� � 45 r C) s ^ n u A C = a N m 0 G � •1 �iS?? NJ • I1 9 m e O r S _ m c C> 0 r 9 C -mi l x y D x i vm t '7� • g m -DZ � y _ f � o m f/I y P7 u y m • 9� x I yy e p OJT• "•.y ._ p" m ' . • 3 ffi� m o - ��,• N I� 3R c �C � m =d �; h... s R w ^-•... d of co 3 - o n y O or CC7 C ° m p 7 a ,N V N m w IV N _ 'N N • � m u = N O �'Sb ti N N VN �I�, c r m3 7i�A ' k) i� [w1 S C) j A gm — — 3 'cam O O s; U 0(.5 o o � � m � li—� .� FIA F�O� 000.1 B`' +14 Erg • • { O (�'� � � � Rey_ ,1� � g•0 O � ® n 3' irq 'ice` '_�+ \If'+, ME a UNDERGROUND TANK TESTS. S, INC. TANK CERTIFICF.I ION & Horner 917 W. Belleview LOCATION DATA CHART F"ZY C�HE_ Porterville, Ca 93257 leak detector Phone (209) 781-6508 NOTICE: It is the owner's responsibility to contact the environmental health department of any failures within 24 Hours of the results given to the owner. OWNER'S Property P r2 A VC o NAME Telephone Tank(s) I1�' V AigrQN LG i L) 1 Address City lip Counly NAME OF LOCATION (e raAA of t 0 Name Address Telephone _ REASON FOR TEST- L �--- -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - — - (Explain Fully) WHO REQUESTED Name _ T{lle r nam TEST AND -WHEN- - t*A s Av — Adatess Telophane � G 4 t a -9 O WHO IS PAYING y, Ag11. Individual Telephone FOR THIS TEST? C7 /a Billing Address City stale Zip Identify by Direction Capacity Brand/Supplier Grade Approx Age Steel Fiberglass ITEM OR SYSTEM TESTED of owner to# TANK ONLY Q Q C) V l t -%e C ill 'uJ b L4 tJ�I ❑ ❑ PRODUCT LINE VENT LINE ❑ 0 VAPOR LINE ❑ ❑ ET ALL OF THE ABOVE 0 Location Cover Fills Vents Mandolded Srphones Pumps INSTALLATION Sfa4rh u �- Concrete El 4" ❑ F m& If Yes ❑ Yes I] �% Suction K Hand ❑ DATA 54000 Dt j- Blacktop J❑' Earth I(1� 2" ❑ 1Y2" El Size No No GL� Turbine ElG! HYDROSTATIC TEST Vapor Recover Other Other North inside driveway, Size ON LINE ❑ Yes None �� Rear of station, etc. Remote Fills ❑ GI.I Which tanks? Stage 1 ❑ Stage 2 ❑ UNDERGROUND WATER Depth to the Water table s the water over the tank? ❑ Yes _ O Tanks to be filled ❑ V hr _ o Distributor FILL -UP -' _ ,W Extra product to "top off' YES NO Name If ARRANGEMENTS Telephone CONTRACTOR, any other MECHANICS, contractor involved OTHER INFORMATION OR REMARKS Additional information on any items above Officials or others to be advised when testing is in progress or completed. Visitors or observers present during test etc. Tests were made on the above tank systems in accordance with Horner EZY Check Leak Detection test procedures prescribed for as detailed on attached lest charts with results as follows: TEST RESULT Tank Identification a Lines Only Tight Leakeage Indicated Date Tested TANKS Yesrkk No ❑ _0 !2 2 Y V _ PRODUCT LINES Lam' Yes ❑ No ❑ ue M & Vent Yes f3� Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Lines Included No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ CERTIFICATION This is to certify that these tank systems were tested on the date(s) shown. Those indicated as "Tight" meet the criteria established by the (National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 329.) CALIFORNIA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGULATIONS ARTICLE 4 SECTION 2643 ( ) Dale DENNIS E GOODAN Technician UNDERGROUND TANK TESTERS, INC./By: Signature SEQUOIA PRINTING, VISALIH 131 11 16 WHITE — FILE CANARY — County PINK— Horner G.R. — Customer VI �cl � r., -IT In N O r� C� z Z z i C tl o cr O m �. J Q U tr ❑ 2 U N o 0 z ` z C7 �J \ C m L o d z W J O U Yww m Z ui _1 �m>(C:" w w z CC a 0 =te= a cc C) w W zz I a m 1 I Ir W LZ z O�� F O� U w w o U U 0 El 0- � I NO 1 m U -o U c Q m �a d O I • l� I C' U) U)4 w a W W Q w Z d Q Q o O J a 0 ___I Q U d LL C/) U)i 00 a O i �w< w I = kr 2I U z w z _ LL I w t- Ca LIJ cc 0 IL �r . JY w0 Y Ir Ir Q D U a O� U C uj Z T mEr E Z) J F / Q U a ~ z O Z P u cr C r wE `1 m r z Cc LL oC a a F- > fJ, H z w U_ U_ W w O U H � U c c O cc a w IL co } Lu LLJ U z w m F- O o[ U W __2 D a F- o ❑ m a J w w J w � 0 Y >Q w Z d cc z D Ir w z Q _ H 2 Z _ �LU , l ct z Lo ` (y J " ¢� �� V i t r D FLW I I I � L li I ' II I II I II I II ' Il t II � II I Il 1 JI I I t g co W W �c I Il I II I II t ' I II II I II II I II ► 1 II II mm_ X X x x x x x x x x x x + I u <Q I 1 I I II II II li II II JI II II II J CL W 1 % \ W f i 1 m f Q ui cn i I W J U) I I r > W U) J W it I II ' f! I II , II I II I II I !I t • it I II I II I ' _ gg ► � x x \ \ x x x x x x x x x x zU) 0o { I I f I I r V II II I! I II !J II 14 t II i d li ` J W 0 > Z W W Oz J Ol W i- wH - CO aJ Y Q w cr 0 F ROUND TANK TWERS, INC. $17 W. BeiWAV Po&.ivil* CA 93257 - D R i lnf A y Build, in� CEfnEIIT &i-ta ! PLA14T i KAt5CR 131 .::3AN AfSOd� � r i�7 S TAW A00 4 GRAVEL CD< UNDERGROUND TANK. TESTE. —s, INC. Horner 917 W. Belleview TANK CERTIFICA�, ION & �Y +�M- Porterville, Ca 93257 LOCATION DATA CHART In& detector Phone (209) 781-6508 NOTICE: It is the owner's responsibility to contact the environmental health department of any failures within 24 Hours of the results given to the owner. OWNER'S Property NAME am Telephone Tank(s) (� l S- Alter ;9� NAME OF LOCATION REASON FOR TEST (Explain Fully) WHO REQUESTED TEST AND WHEN Aitlo LL.•l•=t•T Ll�7JI_i L"F- Luis= 1Ll►Tir�PI•��/L� z l- ye Dolc r WHO IS PAYING an,,Agen or d' id Telephone FOR THIS TEST? [], oX .� $l, PCt-AsANT, V C i. q YELL Billing Address clly • Stale Zip Identify by Direction Capacity Brand/Supplier Grade Approx. Age Steel Fiberglass ITEM OR SYSTEM TESTED of owner ID# TANK ONLY fD/ Dpo UN<A.10 c�tC Ow Al❑ PRODUCT LINE 11I.-I ❑ ❑ VENT LINE ❑ ❑ VAPOR LINE ❑ ❑ ❑ ALL OF THE ABOVE ❑ ❑ ❑ Location / uq 0, L Cover / Concrete Fills Vents 4Yes Manuolded ElYes Slphones Q Pumps Suction P"Hand ❑ INSTALLATION C K 4" ❑ 3" � DATA S ked Blacktop ❑ ' Earth Q/ 2° ❑ �YZ„ ❑ Size No No 1jI Turbine ❑ HYDROSTATIC TEST Vapor Recovery Other Other North inside driveway, Size ON LINE ❑ Yes None LW,, — Rear of station, etc Remote Fills ❑ Which tanks? Stage 1 ❑ Stage 2 ❑ UNDERGROUND s the water over the tank? ❑Yes �� WATER V Depth to the Water table %S,Z%� D" Q Tanks to be filled �YUf..) hr _ `� u Dale Distributor FILL -UP Name Extra product to "top off' (0 NO ARRANGEMENTS Telephone CONTRACTOR, any other MECI IANICS, cunlractor Involved 7 Ple I4 r LC4r_-. 0 .v M,4,4 WA o tj e L— i�r 4 L4LcJ4 c <yJt+L 1 OTHER INFORMATION OR REMARKS Additional information on any items above. Officials or others to be advised when testing is in progress or completed. Visitors or observers present during test etc. Tests were made on the above tank systems in accordance with Horner EZY Check Leak Defection lest procedures prescribed for as detailed on attached test charts with results as follows: TEST RESULTS Tank Tank Identification # Lines Only Tight Leakeage Indicated Date Tested I Yes JI4 No ❑ TANKS L PRODUCT LINES QI/ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Vesper & Vent Yes &,-*I Yes ❑ No ❑ Lines Included No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ CERTIFICATION This is to certify that these tank systems were tested on the date(s) shown. Those indicated as "Tight" meet the criteria established by the (National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 329.) CALIFORNIA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGULATIONS ARTICLE 4 SECTION 2643 ( ) (0-0 Dale DENNIS E GOODAN , Technician UNDERGROUND TA ESTERS, INC./By: Signature SEQUOIA PRINTING-VISALIA )]e. 3176 WHITE — FILE CANARY — County PINK — Horner G.R. — Customer W O w f�s D 7C7 cn m w (D O O o q1 n m CD N o ter' ) � m 'i• t DOm I i I '� I l �~ 1 I I f I "► mm z< p II !I II I li I! Ir II NZ x x x x x M. x x x x Dr � < cm D -u I I I I I f I I I I z m II II Ir II li tr q Ir r {,) O cz x x x x x x x x x x UJ x II II ' I! r II r li II { n [ II II li �m c� II ,I . -1ri II � � II 11 I : II II II II 4 � II W T C D D _ M A m m m x cn c z mo Z 0 IT z � 70 z < Z cn 37r� ❑._ c m O W m � Z - i m m N O c � n a c � c) 0 m m -n L) m z O O D m M z � z ❑ m n m cn O D m O :1) m N ❑ Z O z m m n El D � � r Z z m O D D Z Z 37 O 7K Z "n Z x m0• n : oz��^ m 0.] 0 D V 1 TI ..� �k �O m r" 2 m <� m cn 0 X "iDW � 0O 0 'm C C � m D El MM D Z n m o Z m --j K _ U m O z z m Eb D TI FooIn�0 -0 n D r p v - m m m m m cQ {t � O �1 L O r Ylk 1 D CD Ip -0 ET o e m Z v m O O0-Z O M mmz0 2 A m ° mm m A m7C O 00 m m 0 nn W W Z 133 z D O N o C) = (�ii O xi z 0 Cil 0 p l ctcc�7 (Ae ...6�- pmnp O.L- UNDERGROUND TANK TESTERS, INC. 917 W. Belleview Portendll% CA 93257 f6 SAAD q-GkAdEj- CO.- t El C i n) r)Q 1�.j. SA lJTA Yri I.iZGAR i i A ) %w , 24 Hr. Phone R.W. WILLIAMS, INC. 239 E Newlove 928-7311 Certified Tank Testing Santa Maria, CA Kaiser Sand & Gravel P.O. Box 580 Pleasanton Ca. if . 94566 Attn: Lena Tam RMcmVEa is0V 2 7 . On October 10, 1985 the #2 Diesel fuel tank located at the San Luis Obispo batch plant was tested. Results of testing indicate that the above mentioned tank is tight accumulated change over a period of one hour was less than .05 gal. per hour. Variable factors such as tempature changes of the product in the tank,tempature stratification of the product in the tank, tank end deflection and the presents of any ground water around the tank, was taken into consideration and either compensated for or eliminated. This certification is not to be considered a garentee of continued tight worthyness but rather an indication of current condition. 0 Richard W. Williams President R .W .WILLIAMS , INC. Ot 15. TANK TO TEST f � Man xty ay palillaft 17. FILL -UP FOR TEST 18. CAPAC11Y / Nominal Capacity Gallons 1 Is there doubt as to True Capacity? See Section "DETERMINING TANK CAPACITY" Slick Water Sworn mo baton fIIWp to % In. Gallons By mnal accui ale capacity char) aver FIR up. STICK BEFORE AND AFTER EACH COMPARTMENT DROP OR EACH METERED DELIVERY QUANTITY f trill Station Chan Tank Manulacturer'a Chan cauo"a Company P ny Engineering Dal■ Charts supplied with Other Suck Readings Total Gallons to % In, .000Gallons on. Reading Inventory _aft4w, Tank Diameter & product in full lank (up to fill pipe) ��/0/product in full lank (up to fill pipe) ��/`�/ 18. SPECIAL CON0ITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO TEST THIS TANK 3 7 ,;. L� ?D b f VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM See manual eatler" applleebta. Click below. and »wed procedure in lop (2$). ..0. stop I OWMOQ Walker In tank High water table In tank excavation ❑ Llnshi being tested wllh LVLLT El sloe 11 18 TANK MEASUREMENTS FOR 21. TEMPERATURE/VOLUME FACTOR (a) TO TEST THIS TANK TSTT ASSEMBLY Bottom of tank to Grads* .................... '• Add 30" for d" L o r a l . . . ..... met Add Te" for 3" L or air seal ....... Total tubing to assemble Approximate ........ .. 20. EXTENSION HOSE SETTING Tank top to grad e....... .... ............. .... .... _.. Extend hoes on auction tube 6" or more below lank top ............ . .. . .. .... . .. .... ., 'It Fill pipe extends above grade, use top of fill. Is Today Warmer? I 1 Colder? I I —' F Product in Tank _a F Fill -up Product on Truck F Expected Change ( + or - ) 22. Thermal -Sensor reading otter circulation' aJL_ �7_° 7 � ( F '? digits 23. Digits per IF In range of expected change Nearest Mail. 24- x L000yyr,/1 gallons t49,uenllty In CmIlI :kenl of expansim for full tank (16 oorr1r177) Involved product volume charge In this tank pear -F ( 25. ✓ le/ Q 1/ z/ y ,/4 / volume change par IF (24) Digits per *F In test = This Is Volume change per dIgIL test Range (23) Compute to rl decimal places. factor (a) I •a Rscard details of setting up gth of 11 no it noo4od.) ® N� Thermal H Ligh" + IOEMIIIKZ� �I Oil I► LL j �� ♦ r J a • .i I WOW M. lot Mimi MIA Mims ETTER Vl &I kIl T V MPP e-4q1te, 619A10 and &4q Gorr 6046 L 1/ ' C12 M els r Si. 1 TANK FARM ROAD Surburban Road a 6uckl 0 SITU MPP 16q/e?CZ G✓A?i &7 and &R)911e!1 i!5�? IU/h 6nD nook 6e;OWY 244� pgop0cler WME GOGRT/9/U✓ PIROMAim wea- LOG&WAI E:E— PaoPoSev !gHw 0 0 n 0 2' • ■ • •Ll • • . ■ .. , ■ IF 4 . •. Var-iable 7. T 2' ■ 21 +� Top of Zone of ■1 �_-_ Saturation 10 to 15' 2' i 8" nominal boring '.Tamper -proof' steel locking, cover Sloping concrete apron Ground surface (well #1 will be at grade) 2" nominal Schedule 40 PVC flush threaded casing Cement/Bentonite seal: one sack of Portland cement to 4k-B gallons of Water; up to 4% Bentonite Bentonite pellets (sodium free) Flush -threaded joint, teflon-taped Clean, Washed No.3 Lapis luster sand filter 2" (nominal) PVC machine slotted section (0.020"slot size) 2" (nominal) PVC tail pipe Threaded end cap or plug MONITORING WELL SPECIFICATIONS Schematic - not to scale JIB Judd Hull Associates, Geotechnical Consultants 22654 Watkins Street • Hayward, California 94541 • (415) 582-188G Ms. Lena L. Tam Kaiser Sand and Grave. Post Office Box 580 Pleasanton, California av="" 3 �tj 6 A906 "r Company 94566 Judd P. Hui; 1926 19,. Howard D. Barlow, P E Vonnty" Proposal No. RP86051 June 3, 1986 SUBJECT: Monitoring Facility Installations Existing Underground Petroleum Tank 131 Suburban Road San Luis Obispo Dear Ms. Tam: In response to your request, we have visited the site of your San Luis Obispo Plant and have prepared this proposal to install monitoring wells adjacent to an existing 10,000 gallon diesel fuel tank. Based upon the topographic information contained on the U.S.G.S. San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach Quadrangles, the direction of ground- water flow in the area of the plant appears to be from the northeast to the southwest. Based upon previous investigations performed at this site, you have informed us that groundwater is at a depth of less than 20 feet. The California Underground Storage Tank Regulations require two groundwater monitoring wells for a single underground tank. One of the two wells should be located on the down -gradient side of the tank. Each groundwater monitoring well should extend 20 feet into groundwater or 5 feet into a clay aquitard underlying a shallower aquifer. An illustration showing the proposed configuration of the wells is included as Figure 1. We propose to offer the following services: 1. Coordination of our work with San Luis Obispo County including obtaining installation permits using this proposal as a basis for the proposed wells. Kaiser Sand and Gravel impany P. ?osal No. HP86051 June 3, 1986 2. The drilling and sampling from borings located within approximately 10 feet of the storage facilities. The borings would be drilled using eight -inch diameter hollow stem auger. Two-inch diameter PVC well screen and casing would hp- used_tcL-construct the wells. The wells would backfilled as illustrated in Fissure 1 following the requirements of the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. We understand that backfill materials will be provided by the owner. 3. The soils found in the borings would be classified by the Unified Soil Classification System and logged by our representative during drilling and sampling. Soil sampling would be conducted starting from the ground surface, every five feet to the water table. Soil samples would be capped, refrigerated, and delivered to a chemical laboratory for testing. Water samples would also be taken, sealed, refrigerated, and delivered with the soil samples. The soil and water samples would be tested for hydrocarbon content by a State certified laboratory. 4. Approximate dimensions of the wells with respect to the above ground tank accessories and building locations would be measured after drilling using a 100-foot tape. A site plan, our borings logs, and the chemical test results would be compiled in a written report. We intend to take reasonable precautions during the drilling operations; however, we cannot be responsible for damage to under- ground utilities or structures not accurately indicated on plans provided to us. The cost for performing these services is presently estimated to be approximately $3,000.00 to $3,200.00, and includes drilling, sampling, and logging of the borehole; well development and water sampling; initial chemical analysis; and report preparation. Our fees would be determined on a time and materials basis in accordance with our current Fee Schedule, a copy of which is attached; however, we would not exceed the $3,200.00 figure without your written authorization. The Fee Schedule, which includes a STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS, the provisions of which would prevail throughout the course of our involvement in the project, should be considered a part of this proposal. 1 Kaiser Sand and Gravel -ompany 1 Pr.,posal No. HP86051 June 3, 1986 The quoted fees do not include the cost of monitoring services of the wells after installation, or construction of additional monitoring wells if required by the governing agency. We would be pleased to offer monitoring services on a time -required basis in accordance with our then -current Fee Schedule. Should this proposal meet your approval, please sign and return one copy to our office as our authorization to proceed with the work. Thank you for considering our firm for your geotechnical needs. Respectfully submitted, JHA GEOT ICAL CONSULTANTS, INC. ward Barlow Soil Engineer C.E. 35734 HDB:kg Enclosures: Figure 1 - Proposed Well Profile Fee Schedule Distribution: Kaiser Sand and Gravel Company (2 Copies) APPROVAL: DATE: (Representing Kaiser Sand and Gravel Company) -3- end end Judd Hull Associates, Geotechnical Consultants 22654 Watkins Street • Hayward, California 94541 • (415) 582-1880 FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1986 Judd R, Hull 1928-1982 Howard D. Barlow, P.E Manager JUDD HULL ASSOCIATES is a wholly -owned subsidiary of BSK & ASSOCIATES. BSK has in-house engineering, drilling, geology, materials and chemical testing laboratories. A more complete description of BSK's services and fee schedule will be provided on request. Charges for all work, including projects in progress, will be based on the most current Fee Schedule. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND OFFICE SERVICES 1. Principal or Consulting Engineer. . . . . . . . . . $ 75.00/Hr. 2. Staff Engineer/Geologist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.00/Hr. 3. Expert Witness Testimony, Per Day . . . . . . . . . 800.00 4. Expert Witness Testimony, Half Day. . . . . . . . . 500.00 5. Drafting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Hr. 6. Secretarial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.00/Hr. DRILLING CHARGES 1. Drill Rig and One Operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80.00/Hr. 2. Drill Rig and Two Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . 125.00/Hr. 1986 Fee Schedule Page 2 FIELD OBSERVATION TECHNICAL SERVICES 1. Field Technician (Soils, Concrete, Asphalt, Reinforcing Steel_._Etc,_)_.�. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. —Fi-e--ld- Technician --(-Equipped with -Nuclear- Density Gauge) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Field Personnel Equipped as Requested and Charged a) 1 Hour Minimum for Picking Up Concrete Cylinders; b) 2 Hour Minimum for Observation and Testing; c) Services Over Six Hours are an Eight -Hour Minimum; d) One and One -Half Times Regular Rate for Time in Excess of Eight Hours per Day, Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays. EQUIPMENT CHARGES 1. Vehicle* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Photovac Ultra Sensitive Portable Air Analyzer. . . 3. Portable Power Auger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Nuclear Density Gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. One -Channel Bison Seismograph . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Inductive and Conductive Pipe Locator . . . . . . . 7. Wood Moisture Meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. Unimag Magnetometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Torvane or Penetrometer Tests . . . . . . . . . . . 10. Sample Tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -$-aJD...0.0./Hr . 45.00/Hr. $ 0.45/Mi. 40.00/Hr. 5.00/Hr. 5.00/Hr. 7.00/Hr. 5.00/Hr. 5.00/Day 5.00/Hr. 0.50/Ea. 6.50/Ea. *Applied to Job Sites Over 20 Miles from Hayward Office jnc 1986 Fee Schedule Page 3 LABORATORY TESTS (Preparation of Sample, if Necessary; i.e., Remolded Specimens, Etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40.00/Hr. Soils and Agaregates 1. Moisture Content Determination. . . . . . . . . . . $ 10.00/Ea. 2. Moisture Content and Unit Weight (Tube Samples) 20.00/Ea. 3. Plasticity Index (ASTM D-424) (Includes Liquid Limit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. 4. Liquid Limit (ASTM D-423) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.00/Ea. 5. Sieve Analyses (ASTM D-422 and'D-1140) a) Wash (Percent Passing No. 200-Sieve). 40.00/Ea. b) Coarse. . . . . . . . . . . . o 40.00/Ea. c) Fine, Including Wash. . . . . . . . 60.00/Ea. d) Coarse and Fine, Including Wash . . . . 80.00/Ea. 6. Hydrometer Analysis (ASTM D-422) (Without Sieve or Specific Gravity) . . . . . . . . 90.00/Ea. 7. Compaction Curves a) Standard Proctor (ASTM D-698; AASHTO T-99). . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. b) Four -inch Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557; AASHTO T-180) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120.00/Ea. c) Six-inch Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557; AASHTO T-180) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140.00/Ea. d) State of California 216G (Wet Method) . . 100.00/Ea. e) State of California 216G (Dry Method) . . 120.00/Ea. f) Check Point for Curve Identification. . . 60.00/Ea. 8. "R"-Value, California State Highway a) Untreated Soil or Aggregate . . . . . . . $155.00/Ea. b) Treated (Lime, Cement, Etc.) Soil or Aggregate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.00/Ea. 9. California Bearing Ratio (ASTM -1883) a) Method "D" at 100% Maximum Dry Density. . 325.00/Ea. b) Method "D" at 95% Maximum Dry Density . . 500.00/Ea. end 1986 Fee Schedule Page 4 LABORATORY TESTS Soils and Aggrecates - (Continued) 10. Sand Equivalent a) Average of Three pBz-0a1i Qrnia State_Highway. . . . . . . 70.00/Ea. b) One Point Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Ea. 11. Specific Gravity a) Soils (ASTM D-854). . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Ea. b) +3/4-inch Aggregate (ASTM C-127). 40.00/Ea. 12. Durability Factor a) Coarse Aggregate. . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. b) Fine Aggregate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. c) Combined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200.00/Ea. 13. Unconfined Compression of Soils . . . . . . . . . . 50.00/Ea. 14. Direct Shear Tests (ASTM D-3080) a) Quick, Native or Tube . . . . . . . . . . 150.00/Ea. b) Quick, Remolded . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200.00/Ea. c) Consolidated, Quick . . . . . . . . . . . 250.00/Ea. 15. Consolidation/Swell Tests a) Consolidation Test (ASTM D-2435) ($250.00 Minimum) . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.00/Pt. b) Swell Test (FHA Specifications) . . . . . 100.00/Ea. c) Expansion Index Test (UBCS 29-2). . . . . 150.00/Ea. d) Shrinkage Limit (ASTM D-427). . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. 16. Soil Cement/Lime or CTB/LTB Mix Design. . . . . Quote on Request 17. Permeability Tests a) Constant Head, Granular Soils (ASTM D-2434) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130.00/Ea. b) Falling Head, Granular Soils. . . . . . . 150.00/Ea. c) Other Forms of Permeability Tests . . Quote on Request .JIB J 19860 Fee Schedule Page 5 LABORATORY TESTS Soils and Aggregates - (Continued) 18. 19. Los Angeles Rattler Test, Small Size Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C-131) . . . . . . . . Large Size Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C-131). . . Sulfate Soundness (5 Cycles), per Sieve Size. Minimum Charge per Sample . . . . . . . . . . Asphalt/Concrete . 80.00/Ea. . 100.00/Ea. 60.00/Ea. . 225.00/Ea. 1. Unit Weight of AC Core or Compacted Sample (ASTM D-2726 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30.00/Ea. 2. Unit Weight of Concrete Cylinders . . . . . . . . . 20.00/Ea. 3. Asphalt Coring. . . . . . . . . . .Technician Rate + $20.00/Core 4. Concrete Compression Tests (ASTM C-39) (Including Mold) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.00/Ea. 5. Cylinder Handled, Cured but Not Tested. . . . . . . 10.00/Ea. 6. Proportion of Cement in Hardened Concrete (ASTM C-85 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150.00/Ea. 7. Flexural Test of Concrete Beam (ASTM C-293 or ASTM C-78 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Ea. LABORATORY TESTS Prices for Other Soil, Materials, and Chemical Testing Available Upon Request. OUTSIDE SERVICES Drilling, trenching, bulldozing and similar contract work in connection with the exploration for which we administer a subcontract will be charged at a cost plus 15%. Per diem on projects which require lodging will be charged at cost plus 15% with a minimum charge of $50.00/day/person. THE ATTACHED STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS IS A PART OF THIS FEE SCHEDULE jnc STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS 1. Payment Invoices for Judd Hull Associates' (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant") services will be submitted at his option, on a monthly basis, either as final or progress billing. Invoices will be mailed to the Client and will be due ,,pmeAiAy, but will not be delinquent if paid on or before the 30th day following the date of the invoice. If payment is not so made, under provisions of this agreement, a late payment SERVICE CHARGE will be computed at the periodic rate of 1.5% per month, which is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%, and will be applied to any unpaid balance commencing 30 days after the date of the original invoice. If suit is filed, a reasonable attorney's fee, to be set by the court, shall be included in any judgement in Consu tant's favor. Retainer fees may be charged as assessed in the job proposal. In the event of Termination, the retainer fee will be returned to the Client, minus the sum of fees for services performed plus reasonable termination expenses. 2. Limitation of Liability and Waiver on Condition In performing professional services, Consultant will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable members of the profession practicing in the same or similar locality. No, other warranty, expressed or implied, is made or intended by the proposal for professional services or by furnishing oral or written reports of the findings made. Unless special arrangements are made in writing, prior to commencement of work, it is agreed that the Client will limit any and all liability, claim for damages, cost of defense, or expenses to be levied against the Consultant on account of any design defect, error, omission, or professional negligence to a sum not to exceed,$50,000, or the amount of his fee, whichever is greater. Further, the Client agrees to notify any contractor or subconstractor who may perform work in connection with any design, report, or study prepared by the Consultant of such limitation of liability for design defects, errors, omissions, or professional negligence, and require as a condition precedent to their performing the work a like limitation of liability on their part as against the Consultant. In the event the Client fails to obtain a like limitation of liability provision as to design defects, errors, omissions, or professional negligence, any liability of the Client and the Consultant to such contractor or subcontractor arising out of an alleged design defect, error, ommision, or professional negligence shall be allocated between the Client and the Consultant in such a manner that the aggregate liability for the Consultant for such design defect to all parties, including the Client, shall not exceed $50,000 or the amount of the Consultant's fee, whichever is greater. 3. Disputes In the event that a dispute should arise relating to the performance of the services to be provided under this Agreement, and should that dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including staff time, court costs, attorneys' fees, and other claim -related expenses. end 4. Warranty of Authority to Sign The person signing this contract warrants he has authority as, or on behalf of, the Client for whom or for whose benefit the Consultant's services are rendered. If such a person does not have such authority, he agrees that he is personally liable for all breaches of the terms and bases for the Consultant's services, and that in any action against him for breach of such warranty, a reasonable attorney's fee shall be included in any judgement 5. Pro)ect ormation Client will make available to Consultant all information regarding existing and proposed conditions of the site. The information shall include, but not be limited to., -plot" --plans, topographical —surveys, —hydro - graphic data, and previous soils data, including borings, field or laboratory tests, and written reports. Client will immediately transmit to Consultant any new information which becomes available or any change in plans. Consultant shall not be liable for any incorrect advise, judgement, or decision based on any inaccurate information furnished by Client, and Client will indemnify Consultant against claims demands or liability arising out of or contributed to by such information. 6. Right of Entry The Client will provide for right of entry of the Consultant and all necessary equipment or personnel, in order to complete the work. The Client shall also notify any and all possessors of the project site, whether they be lawfully or unlawfully in possession, that the Client has granted Consultant free access to the project site. While Consultant will take all reasonable precautions to minimize any damage to the property or nearby properties, it is understood by Client that in the normal course of work some damage may occur, the correction of which may, at Consultant's option, be repaired by Consultant and billed at cost to Client. 7. Utilities In the prosecution of this work, the Consultant will take reasonable precautions to avoid damage or injury to subterranean structures or utilities. The Client agrees to hold the Consultant and his agents harmless for any damages to subterranean structures which are not called to Consultant's attention and correctly shown on the plans furnished. 8. Samples All samples of soil and rock will be destroyed 30 days after Submission of our report unless the Client advises us otherwise. Upon request, the Consultant will deliver samples to the Client, charges collect, or will store them -for the Client for an agreed storage charge. 9. Ownership of Documents Reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by the Consultant, as instruments of service, shall remain the property of the Consultant. jna Client agrees that reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents, which is not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by the Client for any purpose whatever. The Consultant will retain pertinent records relating to the services performed for a period of five years following submission of the report, during which period the records will be made available to the Client at reasonable times. Services provided within this agreement are for the exclusive use of the Client. Service performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. No other warranty, expressed or implied,ismom. Client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the location where borings, surveys, or explorations are made by the Consultant and that the data, interpretations and recommendations of the Consultant are based solely on the information available to him. The Consultant will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretation by others of the information developed. 11. Insurance The Consultant represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed by it is and are protected by worker's compensation insurance and that Consultant has such coverage under public liability and property damage insurance policies which the Consultant deems to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shall be provided to Client upon request in writing. Within the limits and conditions of such insurance, Consultant agrees to indemnify and save Client harmless from and against any loss, damage, or liability arising from any negligent acts by Consultant, its agents, staff, and outside consultants employed by it. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability beyond the amounts, limits, and conditions of such insurance. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any loss, damage, or liability arising from any acts by Client, its agents, staff, and other consultants employed by it. 12. Termination This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be effective if that substantial failure has been remedied before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for services performed to the termination notice date plus reasonable termination expenses. In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three months, prior to completion of all reports contemplated by this Agreement, Consultant may complete such analyses and records as are necessary to complete his files and may also complete a report on the services performed to the date of notice of termination or suspension. The expenses of termination or suspension shall include all direct costs of Consultant in completing such analyses, records and reports. end 13. Assigns Neither the Client nor the Consultant may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer his duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. 14. Notice to Property Owner If bills are not paid in full for the labor, services, equipment, or materials furnished or to be furnished, a met anic s ien leading to the loss, through court foreciosure proceedings, of ail or part ot Uwnerls property being so improved may be placed against the property even though Owner has paid his contractor in full. Owner may wish to protect himself against this consequence by (1)requiring contractor to furnish a signed release by the person or firm giving this notice before making payment to contractor, or (2)any other method or device which is appropriate under the circumstances. 15. Backfill Consultant shall backfill all borings or excavations within a reasonable time of completion of explorations. Backfill will be compacted to the extent possible based on the limitations of the equipment used. Settlement of such backfill may occur. Unless otherwise agreed upon, the Client shall fill settled areas as needed. The Consultant shall not be responsible for damage or accidents as the result of improperly backfilled excavations. 16. Construction, Observation and Testing The Client agrees that in accordance with generally accepted practices, the construction Contractor will assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including the safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall be made to apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and Client further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the Consultant harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in conncection with the performance of the work on this project, excepting liability arising from the sole negligence of the Consultant. The Consultant will not be responsible for the general safety on the site or the work of the contractors and third parties. The presence of the Consultant's field representative will be for the purpose of providing observation and field testing. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. The contractor for the project should be so advised. The contractor should also be informed that neither the presence of our field representative nor the observation and testing by our firm shall excuse him in any way for defects discovered in his work. The Consultant shall not be liable or responsible in any manner whatsoever for any damage or earth movement arising in whole or part from any previous construction work performed on the project, adjacent projects, or subsequent work performed by Client or third parties. end 15. TANK TO TEST ! 16. CAPACI I Y j 19� �% Tank Chart � UCH !4% � Nominal Capacity r uapecny chertaevad: � 'I � Tank Menulaclursr'e Cheri tdanitlY by peetx Gedw r Gellonc Company Engineering Data Is Ihere doubt as to True Capacity I Charts wpplled with I ft, T& rand eGreee See Section"DETERMINING TANK CAPACITY" F J Other 17. FILL -UP FOR TEST Stick Readings Total Gallons to li in. 71 Gallons on. Reading y Stick Wet- Etatlom before Fill -up _ __ )P1M-1" — _ Inventory 10115� Q •� - to % In. Gallons FIII up. STICK BEFORE AND AFTER EACH COMPARTMENT DROP OR EACH METERED DELIVERY QUANTITY Tank Olemster d Product In full tank (up to fill y pipe) s 18. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO TEST THIS TANK 3 a rJ- (�2 gO VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM Rrre manual wnlinns applinahln Chnck hafnw and record procedure in log (26). .cl 91egs I 30r$ Water In tank ❑ High water table In tank excavation Ej LInew being tested wlmh LVLLT Siege 11 21, TEMPERATURE/VOLUME FACTOR (a) TO TEST THIS TANK 19. TANK MEASUREMENTS FOR Is Today Warmer? i , Colder? I —° F Product in Tank _° F Fill -up Producl on Truck _° F Expected Change ( + or - ) TSTT ASSEMBLY ,7 onaof tank to Gratis • .................... dm 22. .. ��. Thermal -Sensor reading after circulation' F Add 30" for 4" L ................. _ _ 2 �qh, Neuou 3 a , Add T4" for 3" L or air seal ....... 23. Digits per °F in range of expected chatrge _ f Total tubing to assemble Approximate .. digits J �, OG iris `r/51.3� 20. EXTENSION HOSE SETTING P� 24. 1.x ! la U l gauona ��J tots quantity in coefflclnnE al eapanafon for volume change in Inls lank Tank top to grade•. ,.. ....................... �..`.-jr`" lull tank (16 or 17) Involved product per °F Extend hoes on auction tube 6" or more rr `/n1 7�/-yea /j 2-� 3 1, l below lank top ...... ............................... _ 25. ,. VL ✓ L) ✓ t 2-/ - - _/ `� This is volume change per °F (24) Digits per °F In test Volume change per digit. teal 'if Fill pipe extends above grade, use lop of fill. Range (23) Compute to 4 decimal places. factor (a) LOG OF TEST PROCEDURES 30. HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE 31, VOLUME MEASUREMENTS (0 RECORD TO AEI SAL. 34. TEMPERATURE CONKIISVION USE FACTOR (a) 38. NET VOLUME CHA NGES 39• ACCUMULATED CONTROL EACH READING CHANGE 28. Record detail: of settingu 29. ArNo Sundpip. Leval n Inches 32. Product to GndurU Product Replaced (-) 35. 36. cheer+ 37. Computation Temporal... Adjustment AI N EN Leru recrrit row Eat e.necaoa Beginning Level to of Volume Minus Expansion (+) or M lee lwN cowpuh l end running last. (Use lull No Sensor Sensor Higher + Lower - Ex • ion + Expansion + Sotara Misr Product length of line if needed.) of which Reading (c) Contraction - Contraction (-) chaps per Naw f i Reading Remitted Reading Reding Recovered l+) M33(V)-e37(T) (NFPA criterial 7 A _ F OPS' I o NA /S er ■lam■i1 INI■®II NM- MIS 12IMMI 7'®II ■�m'�rC 1�I�®11 �JI11��11 I ■III Emwj,m� Inr p NFIMPM �M ; • N�r�� IL ��■WIN • • =�Iml■ FAr ' =�ami■ ml . ��I■ • - i1Z3lS ^00G fz olo ,oza 24 Hr. Phone R.W. WILLIAMS, INC. 928-7311 Certified Tank Testing ($00) 05Z4�1- 21I!r3 Kaiser Sand & Gravel P.O. Box 580 Plea ' f . 0,4566 Attn: Lena Tam 239 E. Newlove Santa Maria, CA. RCCZiv�:) On October 10, 1985 the #2 Diesel fuel tank located at the San Luis Obispo batch plant was tested. Results of testing indicate that the above mentioned tank is tight accumulated change over a period of one hour was less than .05 gal. per hour. Variable factors such as tempature changes of the product in the tank,tempature stratification of the product in the tank, tank end deflection and the presents of any ground water around the tank, was taken into consideration and either compensated for or eliminated. This certification is not to be considered a garentee of continued tight worthyness but rather an indication of current condition. Richard W . Williams President R .W .WILLIAMS , INC .