HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-10-2014 ph1 lopesKremke, Kate
From: Mejia, Anthony
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 9:40 AM
To: Kremke, Kate
Subject: FW: City Council Public Hearing Item 1; 1327 Osos Street; June 10, 2014
Attachments: CC_ 6- 10- 14_PH1_OsosSt_MU- Pkg_SaveOur Downtown.docx----
hECEIVED
Agenda Correspondence for 06/10/14 Item PH 1.
JUN 05 2014
Anthony J. Mejia I City Clerk 51.0 CITY CLERK
--
1 tv or sw WIS om spo AGENDA
c,)qc) Palm, `street
i „s, „si, €,- A3.Fcts CORRESPONDENCE P14 I
tel I'Ro5,781 -7102 Date 6 2100.1 ItemA
From: James Lopes [mailto:jameslopes @charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 9:38 AM
To: Ashbaugh, John; Carpenter, Dan; Christianson, Carlyn; Codron, Michael; Dietrick, Christine; Lichtig, Katie; Marx, Jan;
Smith, Kathy; Mejia, Anthony
Subject: City Council Public Hearing Item 1; 1327 Osos Street; June 10, 2014
Dear Mayor Marx and Council Members,
Re: City Council Public Hearing Item 1; 1327 Osos Street; June 10, 2014
Members of Save Our Downtown met and discussed the project at 1327 Osos Street.
We voted to make the recommendations in the attached letter with supporting reasons.
If any of you would like to meet before the hearing next Tuesday, please reply as we would be glad to do so.
We think that this location deserves very compatible two -story buildings that are complementary to the historic
church and buildings in the Old Town Historic District. We think that the City ordinances to reflect and ft with
historic character should be respected for this purpose and not ignored.
Save Our Downtown is agreed that the city parking standards should be followed. We believe waiving the
ordinance parking standard in this case will have a significant negative impact on the neighborhood.
If the city's ordinances have value they should only be waived when there are compelling reasons to do so. We
do not find compelling reasons in this case. In fact there are compelling reasons to adhere to the existing
parking standards. If the project is approved as is, what else could better demonstrate the meaningless and
malleable form of these ordinances?
Thank you in advance for considering the points in the attached letter.
Sincerely,
Jamie Lopes
Chairperson
Save Our Downtown
James Lopes
1336 Sweet Bay Lane
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Ph. 805 - 781 -8960
Save Our Downtown
Comments on City Council Public HeanW Item 1; 1327 Osos Streei ,june 10, 20141
City Council
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
This block of Osos Street is a very important location which is not being respected
by the proposed project. Save Our Downtown recommends that you:
1. DENY the rezoning and leave residential zoning on Osos Street.
• The site is adjacent to an apartment building and is located very close to a neighborhood
grocery/convenience store and Mitchell Park. The apartment building should be
strengthened economically by an adjacent residential building with parking accessed
from Morro Street.
• Mitchell Park is a resource for a residential neighborhood; it is unique with a special
quality. Residential uses should be encouraged and even required near it.
• Building practices can now buffer traffic noise ( a Planning Commission concern) with
insulating windows and walls, and air conditioning can easily be provided to eliminate
the need to open windows near Osos Street for ventilation.
• The design of the office project does not respect the Old Town Historic District and the
historic church, in its height, scale, massing and modernist architectural styling.
• No evaluation of the project is evident that seriously and skillfully analyzes the
surrounding buildings and designs sensitively to be complementary to them.
2. DENY the Tentative Tract Map or continue in order to REDUCE the project to
accommodate all of the required parking spaces within the project site.
The proposed findings are speculative and not as likely as the following points.
• The project is taking away existing parking, including for neighboring apartments, which
will have to be located elsewhere, and cause spill -over impacts on the streets.
• The 30% parking space reduction will cause spill -over parking impacts on the streets,
making the vicinity more unlivable.
• The site is NOT convenient to daily shopping destinations. Residents will need to car -
commute elsewhere to do daily shopping and work.
• Morro Street Bike Boulevard is a street, and it is not going to induce people to have only
one car and a bike. People are more likely to have a second car to carry their bikes and
gear elsewhere. Daily destinations are too far away for most people to choose to ride
bikes.
• Students are likely to occupy some of the condos, as is customary in San Luis Obispo,
and they will bring more cars than even the required two spaces could accommodate.
Office floor area and residential units should be eliminated to provide livable,
comfortable residences and offices. Two -story residences and offices are more
in context with the nearby buildings (the churches are landmarks and should
be taller). The design should meet the City parking requirements.
Save Our Downtown is agreed that the city ordinances should be followed. We believe waiving
the ordinance parking standard in this case will have a significant negative impact on the
neighborhood. If the city's ordinances have value they should only be waived when there are
compelling reasons to do so. We do not find compelling reasons in this case. In fact there are
compelling reasons to adhere to the existing parking standards.
The exception allowance is too open- ended, "discretionary" and speculative. These standards
should be revised, if not deleted, to require specific locational criteria, such as within a set
distance from a bus stop or a grocery store. We suggest that you consider doing so in order to
rely on the Variance as the method for exceptions.
We hope that you will agree that this important location should be residential and fully parked
Thank you for your consideration,
s/ James Lopes
Chairperson
1336 Sweet Bay Lane
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
805 - 602 -1365