Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-13-2012 bw 1 setting the tablecounci laqenOa nepont Meeting Date 11-13-1 2 teen, Number BW Z • C I T Y O F S A N L U I S O B I S P O • FROM : Katie Lichtig, City Manage r Charles Bourbeau, Director of Finance & Information Technolog y Michael Codron, Assistant City Manage r Derek Johnson, Community Development Directo r Carrie Mattingly, Interim Public Works Directo r SUBJECT : SETTING THE TABLE : BACKGROUND MATERIALS FOR 2013-1 5 GOAL-SETTING AND FINANCIAL PLAN PROCES S RECOMMENDATION Review and discuss the accompanying background information in preparation for the 2013-15 goal - setting and Financial Plan process : 1.Status of 2011-13 Goals and Objective s 2.Status of General Plan Implementation Program s 3.Status of Current Capital Improvement Plan Project s 4.Long-Term Capital Improvement Plan DISCUSSION The City's goal-setting and Financial Plan process for the next two year period is now underway . On January 8, 2013, the Council will hold a Community Forum followed by the Council Goal - Setting Workshop on January 26, 2013 . As background for the upcoming budget sessions, Counci l and the public will be provided with a series of status reports to update the status of projects an d goals currently underway or approved in prior Council actions . These reports are provided as part o f this item . Additionally at the December 18, 2012 City Council meeting another report will defin e the overall fiscal context in which the Financial Plan will be prepared . The fundamental purpose o f the Financial Plan is to allocate financial resources to accomplish adopted goals over the next tw o year period. This process does not begin from scratch, but rather builds upon the City's adopte d long-term plans and policies as well as the current fiscal context and outlook . The General Fund Five-Year Fiscal Forecast for 2013-18, which will be presented to the Cit y Council on December 18, 2012 . The timing of this report is due, in part, to the fact that the City stil l awaits receipt of Ca1PERS valuation reports which contain cost estimates for retirement benefits fo r all city employees . Additionally potential impacts related to the November 6 election (particularl y the local impacts associated with Proposition 30) cannot yet be projected . Lastly, staff ha s implemented an enhanced approach to major revenue forecasting which will be undertaken b y Beacon Economics, the economic forecasting firm that is instrumental in the Central Coas t Economic Forecast . The results of this analysis will be available for the December 18, 201 2meeting. BW1-1 Setting the Table : Background Materials for Goal-Setting Process Page 2 •When complete, the Five Year Fiscal Forecast will assess the ability of the General Fund to delive r current service levels, maintain existing infrastructure and facilities, preserve the City's long-ter m fiscal health by aligning revenues and costs, and maintain fund reserve balances per adopted polic y over the next five years . The five year forecast is a required piece of information in order t o develop a reliable and accurate long term outlook . As the financial planning process unfolds it is safe to say that the City is in an improved financia l condition than at the same stage of the 2011-13 process . Preliminary un-audited financial results fo r 2011-12 reflect that major revenue sources such as sales tax and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT ) continue to rebound with TOT for 2011-12 reaching pre-recession levels . Additionally, the Cit y achieved more expenditure savings than expected in each of the last two fiscal years . As a result, th e City achieved an increase in General Fund balance as opposed to an expected decline in 2011-1 2 and has maintained its reserve above the adopted policy objective of 20% of operating expenses . Additionally, the City's successful negotiations with its bargaining units will reduce long term personnel costs . While a more thorough assessment of the City's long term financial health an d sustainability will be completed with the updated five year forecast, the City's forecast in June 201 2 indicates the City will enter the 2013-15 Financial Plan process with revenues and expenditure s balanced . STATUS OF 2011-13 GOALS AND OBJECTIVE S Attachment 1, Status of the City's Major Goals for 2011-13, details progress as of October 1, 201 2 all major city goals as well as other important Council objectives . As of October l s`the City is 63 % of the way through the two-year Financial Plan period, and progress on the majority of the goal s and objectives are near or exceed this level . The report begins with a quick report card on the status of the goals and objectives . The report car d then is followed by a short summary of notable changes from the original action plan and the n detailed reports on each goal and objective . STATUS OF GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S Attachment 2 provides a summary of the status of all General Plan Implementation Programs a s well as implementation programs for key "area" plans including : Downtown, Mid-Higuera and th e Railroad Historic District . This report also covers action items and the status of efforts in th e Airport Area, Margarita Area and Orcutt Area Specific Plans . As discussed in greater detail in the report, of the 448 individual implementation programs in th e General Plan, 81% (362) of them are completed or have been integrated into the City's ongoin g operations . This is a five percent increase of implemented programs since the last Financial Pla n reporting . Given the ambitious nature of the General Plan and its twenty-year time horizon, staff believes tha t this represents significant progress in achieving General Plan goals . The incomplete programs (19% of the total) are classified as follows : • BW1-2 Setting the Table :Background Materials for Goal-Setting Process Page3 • • 1% (5) as being relatively easy to achieve from a resource perspective . •12 .5% (56) as being moderately difficult to achieve . •5 .5% (25) as being difficult to achieve . STATUS OF CURRENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT S The purpose of the report contained in Attachment 3 is to provide the Council with a summary of th e status of the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects . As discussed in greater detail in th e report, staff is making substantial progress in achieving CIP goals . Of the 186 projects that have bee n financially active in 2012-13, 62% (114) are either completed or under construction ; 3% (6) are in the bid process ; 20% (38) are under design ; and 15% (28) are under study, in many cases with preliminary work completed and now ready for the design phase . LONG-TERM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLA N The Long-Term CIP report (Attachment 4) provides a glimpse into the future of the City . Many o f the City's current infrastructure assets are not adequate to handle the needs of the future . Major projects in the Long Term CIP include construction of new public safety facilities, upgrades to th e City water reclamation facility, a new interchange at Prado Road and Highway 101, major cree k and flood protection projects, major bridge replacements, and new bike paths . The timeframe fo r •completing the projects included in the Long Term CIP coincides with the proposed build-out of th e City's General Plan, now assumed as the year 2050 . With this understanding, the Long-Term CIP is one of the pieces of information for the Council t o consider in setting goals and priorities for 2013-15 . In this context, these projects provide a n important starting place in assessing which ones might be a high priority to consider in the next tw o years . The list is conceptual, and in most cases, the projects on the list have not undergone detailed analysis, nor the rigor of the public review process . Many of the projects include outside fundin g sources such as private development and grants from the regional, state and federal level . Thes e projects represent City staff's best assessment of costs and scope based on what is known today, but may undergo changes in scope or importance as new challenges and issues emerge over time . FISCAL IMPAC T There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of reviewing the status reports accompanying thi s Council Agenda Report . SUMMAR Y In preparation of the goal-setting process for the 2013-15 Financial Plan, it is important t o understand the City's current financial situation as well as the status of current goals, objectives , CIP projects, and implementation plans . The attached status reports help define for Council and th e community the context in which the 2013-15 Financial Plan will be prepared . BW1-3 Setting the Table : Background Materials for Goal-Setting Process Page 4 •ATTACHMENT S 1.Status of 2011-13 Goals and Objective s 2.Status of General Plan Implementation Program s 3.Status of Current Capital Improvement Plan Project s 4.Long-Term Capital Improvement Pla n eparts\2012\2012-11-13\sethng the table (bourbeau)\draft car-11-13-12 setting the table.d • BW1-4 • Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 STATUS OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVE S As of October 1, 201 2 S city of san Luis oBisp o BW1-5 Attachment 1 STATUS OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVE S As of October 1, 2012 • TABLE OF CONTENT S INTRODUCTION CARRYOVER GOALS AND OBJECTIVE S Overview 1 Other Important Council Objective s Report Card: Major City Goals and Creek and Flood Protection 3 2 Other Important Council Objectives 1 Skatepark 3 2 Report Card: Address as Resources Permit 2 Airport Area Annexation 3 2 Action Plan Changes 2 Broad Street Corridor Plan 3 2 Next Report 2 MAJOR CITY GOALS STATUS OF MAJOR CIP PROJECTS Status of Major Capital Improvement 3 4 Economic Development 3 Plan (CIP) Project s Preservation of Essential Services and 5 Fiscal Healt h Neighborhood Wellness 1 0 Traffic Congestion Relief 1 3 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL • OBJECTIVE S Open Space Preservation 1 9 Infrastructure Maintenance 2 1 Planning : Update Land Use and Circulation Elements 2 4 Affordable Housing/Homeless Services 2 6 ADDRESS AS RESOURCES PERMI T Climate Protection 3 0 Parks and Recreation 3 0 Historic Preservation 31 BW1-6 Attachment 1 INTRODUCTIO N • OVERVIEW This report details the status of Major City Goal s and Other Important Council Objectives set by th e Council as part of the 2011-13 Financial Plan as o f October 1, 2012 . In general, we are on track i n accomplishing these objective s based on the work programs adopted by the Council . Report Card .The following is a quick "report card" on the status of Major City Goals and Other Important Council Objectives base d on the "action plans" approved by the Council as part of the 2011-1 3 Financial Plan. As a benchmark, at October 1 , 2012, we are about 63% throug h the two-year Financial Plan period . Most of the goals and objectives are near or exceed this level, with most showing good progress . Organization .The "report card" is followed by a short summary of notable changes from the origina l action plan. After this is a more detailed report on each Major City Goal and Other Important Counci l Objective, which shows the objective, action plan a s adopted by the Council, an y revisions and a brief statu s summary as of October 1, 2012 . Revisions are displayed as follows : •Additions are shown in italics ; •Date changes are shown i n italics and highlighted in a separat e column ; and • Deletions are shown i n strikeout . Important Not e Many of these are multi - year goals that hav e activities associated wit h them that go beyond th e two-year 2011-13 tim e frame . This status report is focused on approved "Action Plan" tasks as of October 1, 2012 .Shorter reports are provided fo r "Address as Resources Permit" fo r 2011-13 as well as for "carryove r goals" from 2009-11 . ReportCard : 2011-13 Major CitGoals &Other Important Council Objective s Percent Complete as of October 1,2012 Per Actions Plan Task s MAJOR CITY GOAL S Economic Developmen t Services & Fiscal Healt h Neighborhood Wellness Traffic Congestion Relief COUNCIL OBJECTIVE S Open Space Preservatio n ifrastructure Maintenanc e Ise & Circulation Element using/Homeless Services 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Preservation of Essentia l OTHER IMPORTA N Planning : Update Lan d Affordable H -1 -BW1-7 Attachment 1 INTRODUCTION Report Card : 2011-13 Address as Resources Permit Percent Complete as of October 1, 201 2 Climate Protectio n Parks and Recreatio n Historic Preservation 1 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100 % ACTION PLAN CHANGE S As noted above, in general we are on track i n accomplishing these goals and objectives based o n the work programs adopted by the Council . Notabl e changes from the original action plans include th e following : Traffic Congestion Relief.Several of the tasks in this action plan have been delayed as, at th e direction of the Council, staff have focused effort s on other priorities . These priorities include th e Chevron project, the Land Use and Circulatio n Element Update and the development of an oversized vehicle parking ordinance . Affordable Housing/Homeless Services.Due to th e increasing number of individuals using their vehicle s as dwelling units, Council directed staff to focu s efforts on the establishment and evaluation of a safe shelter pilot program that provides homeless person s with vehicles a safe place to temporarily par k overnight with the goal of eventually transitionin g them into permanent housin g In October 2012, due to the initial success of th e pilot program, staff received Council directio n regarding the establishment of a permanent progra m and development of a permanent safe shelte r ordinance . NEXT REPORT We will present the next "formal report" to th e Council in February 2013 as part of the 2012-1 3 Mid-Year Budget Review . In the interim, we wil l keep the Council up-to-date on the status of majo r projects through agenda reports, Council Notes an d other briefing opportunities . BW1-8 • • Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN T ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN T Objective .Increase focus on economic development . Support creation of head-of-household jobs through developing strategies for infrastructure, focusing on promising growth sectors, and expediting desired economi c activity . Expand collaboration with Cal Poly, Cuesta, business community and responsible agencies . Action Pla n Task Current Revise d Economic Development 3tr t'gid ln 1 .Create a Project Plan to guide development of the Economic Development Strategi c Plan . Complet e 2 .Conduct research and analysis with the assistance of local experts and utilize current census data to identify the characteristics that will define "head of household jobs" fo r the purpose of guiding the Strategic Plan process . Conduct baseline research o n metrics that maybe used to evaluate progress towards accomplishment of the Majo r City Goal . Complet e 3 .Create a stakeholder group consisting of residents, business owners, property owners , and representatives of the County, Economic Vitality Corporation (EVC), Chamber o f Commerce, Downtown Association and other community groups to provide input o n the scope of work for the request for proposals (RFP). Complete 4 .Issue an RFP and scope of work for a contract to develop a City of San Luis Obisp o Strategic Plan for Economic Development . Complete 5 .Execute the consultant contract, develop strategic plan, and present recommende d Strategic Plan to Council for consideration including an implementation strategy fo r the 2012-13 fiscal year . 7/12 10/12 6 .Implement the new Economic Development Strategic Plan . In astruc C;e4$ -4 Yiv AWfaYi {3 3 '"'j .^c"M~i H3 igNjR !'B#F A .. [ 4 ,. ,v t t3 t mw~ t f$.1 x+~R"~PZ^L"'wW~.^..4 i ~ s ... Ongoin g T x .R.. e . N~'"~5 +3'f % +~ G,( ' S'.w F »roof „'-v~''w'a~~ 1 .Develop an RFP for the analysis of infrastructure requirements in the Margarita an d Airport areas, with a scope of work to include a strategy for phasing and financing o f key infrastructure components needed to move development forward and suppor t creation of head of household jobs . S42 3/1 3 2 .Develop and present a program for Council consideration based on th e recommendations in the report . 343-6/1 3 y~+t ~~'N `-`~`y~~a .F~m~'~'z ~1.^cyX?+*rs R~*M”gx (A VDll trn PSIS}llmlfi fAatli's '4 (it .r ~'.~"C'1 /Y ?8 .5 .4 F <ie ..lx x ... p »s 1 R(it~ hor3 3c e>: ~.F 1 .Continue to invest in the goals of the Collaboration Committee as a partner with th e County, Cal Poly, and the business community in improving the entrepreneuria l culture of the community in an effort to create head of household jobs . Continue t o work with Cuesta College, the EVC and the business community to increas e opportunities that facilitate job growth. Ongoing Status Summary : 60% Complete .The following is a summary of accomplishments and important next step sfor this goal . BW1-9 • Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN T Activity within the Economic Development Program included several exciting developments during this period • such as : •The final draft of the Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) was released to the public on October 1 , 2012 in preparation for its adoption by the City Council, scheduled for October 16, 2012 . The document wa s informed by significant public outreach including four public workshops and was guided by a steerin g committee of community stakeholders . Input from residents, the Chamber of Commerce, the Downtow n Association, the Economic Vitality Corporation, the Planning Commission and City Council all have contributed to a comprehensive and forward looking strategy for economic growth in the City . Implementation of the strategy has already started with the approval of a scope of work for the Communit y Development Organizational Assessment, which includes EDSP Strategy 1 .1 and actions relating t o improving the development review process . The next step after its adoption will be to issue a Request fo r Proposals (RFP) for the infrastructure financing study, scheduled for March 2013 . •On September 18, 2012, the City Council held a Study Session to provide an introduction to the Chevro n project. The project Draft Environmental Impact Review (EIR) is presently under development, and the stud y session provided the City Council with an introduction to the overall project concepts . In 2011, the Cit y Council reviewed a proposal by Chevron to enter into a development agreement with the City to cover th e long term phasing of both public and private development proposed for the property . Chevron would b e responsible for the installation of more than 50% of the public facilities (such as transportation infrastructure ) identified in the Airport Area Specific Plan over a 25-year period . Staff continues to make progress i n discussions with Chevron Corporation regarding the development agreement . Two consultant reports are currently under production. The first by Goodwin Consulting Group is a fiscal and economic impact analysi s for the project, which will help staff evaluate the public benefits of the project . The second is analysis of th e proposed reimbursement agreement concepts by Magis Associates to identify the associated risks an d recommend ways to mitigate risk . Both reports are expected to be submitted to staff in late October . •The City Council-approved public-private partnership with Digital West Networks has resulted in th e completion of the fiber-optic cable ring around the City . This project has significantly improved City technology redundancy and back-up benefiting public safety, emergency preparedness and genera l productivity . •The business friendly website (www.openforbusinessinslo .com),launched through a joint effort of the Cit y and the Chamber of Commerce, has been updated to include space available listings, and promotiona l materials have been developed to promote the website to visitors and local businesses looking to expand . •The Collaboration Committee work has included collaboration on the incubator space called the HotHous e located at 955 Mono, which has concluded another successful summer of preparing Cal Poly entrepreneur s for the challenges of launching their own products and running their own businesses . Ongoing work continue s to focus on growing businesses and coordinating services and entrepreneurial forums . Continuation of th e HotHouse model is being promoted at the 955 Morro location, with an expansion of services to be mad e available for small businesses . For instance, the location is being considered for its potential to host a co - working space . • -4 - BW1-10 Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS — PRESERVATION OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES AN D FISCAL HEALT H • PRESERVATION OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND FISCAL HEALT H Objective. Adopt a budget that sustains the city's short and long-term fiscal health, preserves public health an d safety and other essential services in line with residents' priorities, and includes cost reduction strategies . Action Plan Task Current Revise d & ~a dffib'a.ento 'I gf 1S M1 ~ 1, b'S. S+'3FMt x'yr1tt~t'nY 11 5 B q2 !£?~f 8 '~'i 1 `vyy .e v`C~fla ~,,, %a,vi.„M ..5.3>.,334 ^: 1 . Identify candidate departrnents for one structured organizational review . Issu e request 1 proposals 1 consulting 1 systematically addres s operating performance, . reductions, and opportunities to improve service . Complete reviews and present to City Manager. 12/12 .i S ;t /: ~t '°i ff `T •. .Y nrwY~b Continue to review and implement ideas . savings or Increased revenues a s recommended by staff and community members .Ongoin g 3 . Evaluate at least 1 opportunities 1 managed competitio n identified in prior and current organizational reviews .Ongoin g Perform focused overview of City's organizational 1 identify potential • reorganization, combination,1 other modifications to improve efficiency and reduc e cost . 12/1 2 5 Using framework 006 analysis, bbenclunark key City financia l and outcome measures with comparable communities . Develop a schedule for updating benchmark analysis on a recurring basis . 6/12 12/1 2 •1 ...1 ••”... ~!/~]p -ttl F i PI91Z ~~9t ~11 i I Rlt d1 Y(f~q i 9 k-6 i $$R 1~i~°Cm{{~§}`„cx>g++~ Y2i':~~s~-~~~~~`43 ~~F awl, 1 . Develop short term and long term strategy for personnel cost containment and receive approval from Council prior to labor negotiations . 6/1 3 Complete "$ -~ 6n k 2 . Negotiate cost containment actions through ongoing negotiation process with al l employee groups . gig Complete 3 . Establish a process to periodically review and monitor personnel costs and the impact of those costs on overall financial health. Ongoing #a Y $c5` @4!`t5 ..4 TS3S 11/1 2 S o'3 k A%~. a $§t&E .,?z(G AfL g5 ?M1/iwl~f/-l+.~kAh3 i 9,q '.',. iP !i 7 h +2 4 +€Y 3'ak S"'bm9 s ~I the +~5ty s revenue source s ..~m5'v ~vlPo b`P{i ?P e~SE •$~Idst~X ~ 1 . Examine threats to the City's Utility Users Tax revenue from federal and stat e legislation . Identify actions and develop plan to address problems as needed . P { kTa ~h iGt ~t ~~ 6/1 2 2 . Conduct Business License Tax audit with Franchise Tax Board data .6/12 12/12 BWI-1 1 • Attachment I MAJOR CITY GOALS — PRESERVATION OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES AN D FISCAL HEALT H Tas k 3 . Conduct Transient Occupancy Tax audits . Curren t 'fin o0 Revise d 3/1 3 4 . Explore the possibility of establishing a storm drain utility and receive Counci l direction . 2/1 3 a e cammumty osresew ea st .4/tsfsb s,24 4-4044 444 4 1 . Hire consultant to conduct public opinion research .Complete 2 . Conduct public opinion research .Complete 3 . Present survey results and analysis to Council .Complete 4 . Determine optimal timing of ballot measure .§l}2 Complete 5 . Initiate public information/education program .Ongoing 1 . Refine five-year capital improvement program that will responsibly protect the City's infrastructure assets, including building facilities, and develop plan for funding a s needed . s 12/12 4 .4 is :144 2 . Update Fleet Management Policy to reflect revised fleet life cycles . Develop long - term fleet replacement schedule . Complete 3 . Evaluate Information Technology replacement needs . Develop long-term replacement schedule . 6 2 3/1 3 4 . Identify funding strategies for Fleet and Information Technology replacement needs . Establish internal services funds if determined to be appropriate . g/~3 4/1 3 5 . Review liability and workers compensation claims trends and establish a plan o f funding if needed . # RP;&R UPI -RR "' itu 1 o . In4leResUm .s. 1 . Update General Fund Five-Year Forecast at least twice annually, at mid-year and wit h recommended budget . Ongoing A,- Ongoing . . . 2 . Prepare focused reports on areas of interest to city management and Council .Ongoing Status Summary : 60% Complete .The following is a summary of accomplishments and important next step s for this goal . Cost Saving s The 2011-13 Financial Plan includes an expectation that the City will realize cost savings through efficiency an d effectiveness measures implemented over the two-year financial plan period . These savings measures includ e ideas generated by the public through the financial plan process, by staff through the Non-Operating Budget BW1-1 2 • Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – PRESERVATION OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES AN D FISCAL HEALT H Balancers (NOBBs) exercise, and by consultants through bi-annual organizational assessments . The amount o f savings that the City is seeking through this effort corresponds to a 3-to-1 return on investment with respect to th e cost of conducting the organizational assessment . An organizational assessment of the Community Developmen t Department has been initiated and an RFP released. The City has also initiated a formal review of the potential fo r consolidation of the Public Works and Utilities Departments . Overall, the City is planning to achieve $50,000 i n savings during 2011-12, and an additional $100,000 in savings during 2012-13 . City staff has formalized th e process whereby ideas for cost-savings generated by efficiency measures and organizational assessments will b e measured . Staff has also started the process of implementing and accounting for these ideas . Additionally, in Jun e 2012, the City refinanced lease revenue refunding bonds that were used to fund various land purchases an d improvements at the Damon-Garcia Sports Fields . This will result in approximately $65,000 in annual savings t o the General Fund from 2013-2029 . Personnel Cost Containmen t The 2011-13 Financial Plan also assumed employee concessions to achieve a balanced budget and long ter m financial stability while retaining General Fund reserves at or near policy levels . Council provided staff with labo r relations objectives in September 2011 and these objectives were shared with all employee groups wit h agreements expiring at year end . The objectives include a $3 .1 million City-wide reduction of total compensatio n costs and pension cost containment or reductions . A resolution adopted by Council on December 6, 2011 shifte d the entire eight percent employer paid member contribution (EPMC) to unrepresented management, departmen t head, and appointed officials effective January 5, 2012 . A resolution adopted by Council on March 6, 201 2 approved a four-year agreement with the International Association of Firefighters Local 3523, phasing in the ful l nine percent EPMC to the employees, introduced a second tier pension benefit, and included no cost of livin g increases for the term of the agreement . A resolution adopted by Council on April 10, 2012 approved phasing i n the entire eight percent EPMC to unrepresented confidential employees, introduced a second tier pension benefit , and included no cost of living increases or changes to the City contribution to health insurance for the term of th e agreement . A resolution adopted by Council on May 15, 2012 approved a three-year agreement with the Polic e Staff Officer's Association (SLOPSOA), phasing in a 4 .5% salary reduction (as these employees currently pay th e full member contribution to Ca1PERS), introduced a second tier pension benefit, included no cost of livin g increases for the term of the agreement, and included no increase in the City contribution to health insurance unti l December 2014 . Also on May 15, 2012, Council approved a letter of agreement with the Fire Battalion Chiefs ' Association (BCs), phasing in 7 .5% salary reduction (as this unit currently pays the full member contribution t o CaIPERS) and introducing a second tier pension benefit consistent with the agreement with the Fire Union .A resolution adopted by Council on June 19, 2012 approved a three-year agreement with the San Luis Obispo Cit y Employees Association (SLOCEA), phasing in the entire eight percent EPMC shift to the employees . A resolution adopted by Council on October 16, 2012 approved a four-year agreement with the San Luis Obispo Polic e Officers Association (POA), phasing in a 4 .0% salary reduction . POA agreed to pay an additional 3% towar d CaIPERS Pension costs (this unit currently pays the full member contribution to CaIPERS). These agreement s included second tier pension benefit for Police Safety and Miscellaneous employees . Together, these agreements , when fully implemented achieve $3 .2 million in ongoing annualized savings . Measure Y On December 13, 2011, City staff presented the results of the 2011 Citizen Satisfaction Survey to the City Council with a recommendation to direct staff to continue to evaluate placing the reauthorization of the City's half-cent sales tax (Measure Y) on the general election ballot in November 2012, and return to the City Council i n spring 2012 with an update . The Council accepted this recommendation and staff moved forward with an outreac h effort . Information gathered through this effort informed staff's recommendation regarding the timing of Measur e Y reauthorization . Staff provided the Council with an update and recommendation on June 5, 2012 . Council determined not to place Measure Y renewal on the November 2012 ballot . The Council will have anothe r opportunity to place Measure Y before the voters for renewal in November 2014 . During the 2013-15 Financial Plan development process, staff will provide Council with additional information regarding options for addressin g the potential loss of Measure Y revenue if renewal is not placed on the ballot or if the half-cent sales tax is no t reauthorized by voters . -7- BW1-13 Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS — PRESERVATION OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES AN D FISCAL HEALT H Long Term Liabilities Work on five-year asset plans will correspond to timelines for the development of the draft 2013-15 Financia l Plan . This work is part of the Public Works Department assessment implementation plan for General Fun d infrastructure . Benchmark Study The benchmark cities used in the 2006 study were reviewed to determine if they are still comparable to San Lui s Obispo . For the updated benchmark study, the City of Ventura will be removed and the City of Paso Robles added in order to provide as accurate a comparison as possible . Using framework set forth in the initial 2006 analysis , Finance staff have begun compiling key financial and outcome measures of San Luis Obispo and the comparabl e communities . The Department Head team reviewed the list of benchmarks used in 2006 and provided input fo r the current study . Utility User Tax (UUT) Analysis and Potential Ballot Measur e Staff explored cost-effective options for a review of the City's UUT practices, and on September 20, 2011 , Council approved such a contract with MuniServices . This agreement provides for a UUT compliance an d revenue protection program and will assist the City in identifying and correcting errors or omissions that caus e under-realized revenues . Additionally, these services include assistance with development of a ballot measur e aimed at updating the City's UUT ordinance language and protecting it against erosion due to new legislation o r lawsuits . The citizen satisfaction survey mentioned above also included questions related to a potential UU T ballot measure so that Council can decide how to proceed . On June 5, 2012, staff asked Council for guidance, an d on July 10, 2012, Council approved placing a measure modernizing the UUT ordinance on the November 201 2 ballot. Equipment Replacement Fundin g Staff have reviewed all fleet equipment assets and completed a comprehensive equipment replacemen t spreadsheet which identifies the timing of projected fleet purchases and the replacement funds needed over th e life of the assets . Development of a "condition assessments" per each fleet replacement and an update of the Flee t Management Policy was postponed until the Fleet Manager position was filled in August 2012 . Informatio n Technology (IT) staff are now creating a similar spreadsheet for IT hardware and software . Following the completion of these two schedules, the next step will be to assess available funding, develop a funding plan an d establish an appropriate funding strategy for equipment replacement . Business License Tax Audit After a successful effort to ensure business license compliance from residential rental property owners, staff hav e begun a Citywide business license tax audit . With cooperation from the Downtown Association, the effort bega n in the Downtown core area. Staff canvassed this area, recorded the names of businesses that did not appear in th e City's business license database, HdL, and notified these businesses of the requirement to hold a license i f conducting business in the City . This process resulted in new business licenses issued in the Downtown area . Th e next step in this project is underway, utilizing data from the Franchise Tax Board (FTB). This information wa s cross-checked with the data in HdL and is being reviewed for anomalies to confirm which businesses are not i n compliance and will be subject to the enforcement process . Staff are also working with the City Attorney's Offic e to streamline the current citation process to ensure the effectiveness of these methods and will implement the ne w enforcement efforts simultaneously with the FTB effort . The next step will be to mail enforcement letters to th e businesses that staff believe should have a license . Departmental Efficiencie s On January 17, 2012, Council approved the Water Reclamation Facility Sustainable Solutions Turnkey energ y efficiency project investment grade analysis and 50% project design . This project is a public/private partnershi p with PG&E . The investment grade analysis is moving forward with an estimated completion date of Decembe r 2012 . Staff will return to Council in early 2013 with a recommendation for this project based on the complete d study and preliminary design . g_ BW1-14 • • Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – PRESERVATION OF ESSENTIAL SERVICES AN D FISCAL HEALT H Five Year Fiscal Forecas t Staff updated key revenue assumptions and provided updates to the five year fiscal forecast for both the 2011-1 2 Mid-year Review and the 2012-13 Financial Plan Supplement . The updates were key to monitoring the City's long term financial sustainability . Staff is working on a formal comprehensive update to all aspects of the five year fiscal forecast for use in Council decision making during the 2013-15 Financial Planning process . • -9 -BW1-15 Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – NEIGHBORHOOD WELLNES S NEIGHBORHOOD WELLNESS • Objective. Embrace and implement pro-active code enforcement and Neighborhood Wellness Policies . Action Pla n Task Current Revise d 1 .Community coordination on new program elements .Ongoing 2 .Review City policy regarding voluntary compliance & evaluate Neighborhoo d Services Team . TBD Ongoing 3 .Create new job classification of Neighborhood Services Specialist .Complete 4 .Develop public outreach program .Complete 5 .Public outreach campaign .Complete 6 .Hire additional staff .Complete 7 .Train new staff .Complet e 8 .Begin "soft start" of program .Complet e 9 .Council review of proposed changes to Municipal Code and code enforcemen t procedures manual . Complet e 10 . Begin full enforcement efforts .Complet e 11 . Monitor progress and solicit feedback from external stakeholders .Ongoin g 12 . Database enhancements and information sharing improvements .Ongoing Status Summary : 90% Complete.The following is a summary of accomplishments and important next step s for this goal . Internal Collaboration Internal collaboration has been ongoing in the hiring of the new Neighborhood Services Specialist (NSS ) positions . The Neighborhood Services and Parking Services offices collaborated with Code Enforcement's request for input and suggestions on the NSS job description, interview questions and interview pane l representation . The Neighborhood Services Manager provided Code Enforcement with the current Neighborhoo d Enhancement Ordinance (NEO) enforcement training manual and printed Neighborhood Enhancement Ordinanc e (NEO) outreach and education materials currently in use which will be modified to reflect the new positions . An ongoing effort associated with the Neighborhood Wellness objectives is cross-training staff within severa l departments to enhance enforcement and response efforts . Collaboration between Police, Fire, Parking Service s and the Code Enforcement Office has been established so the appropriate enforcement personnel are aware o f existing problems and can handle them efficiently . As an example, during a parking citation appeal one violato r indicated parking was difficult at the house he lived in because there were six residents . The Parking Manage r forwarded the information to the Code Enforcement Officer for follow-up . Additionally, the Police Departmen t -10 -BW1-16 • • • Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS — NEIGHBORHOOD WELLNES S Student Neighborhood Assistance Program (SNAP) employees report violations observed during their late nigh t parking and noise shifts . Policy Review Staff was directed to review practices related to voluntary compliance of the regulations to determine when it i s appropriate to escalate the level of enforcement efforts . As suspected, there were uneven levels of enforcemen t efforts between City departments responsible for these activities . For example, some departments escalat e enforcement very quickly while other departments allow time for compliance efforts . As a result of the review o f policies and practices, it was determined that strategic escalation of enforcement should occur Citywide . The process will include three levels : a Notice to Correct (NTC), a Notice of Violation (NOV) and administrativ e citations . The Notice to Correct will notify the violator of the code violations, warn of possible fines and establis h a timeline for action by the violator to avoid fines or fees . Based on the City's cost recovery for code enforcemen t policies, fees will be doubled for any permit issued to correct code violations . If no action is taken within th e prescribed timeline, a Notice of Violation will be sent . The NOV will include an additional cost recovery charg e and an additional warning of impending citations . If the violator remains recalcitrant, staff will begin the administrative citation process . This new process will not apply to the enforcement of noise violations, which ar e already subject to the issuance of formal warnings for initial violations and administrative citations for both th e offender and the property owner for subsequent violations within any nine-month period . Additionally, n o changes are necessary for parking violations . There are no warnings for parking in yards or blocking a publi c sidewalk. If the violation cannot be corrected immediately, a citation is issued . In April 2012, the City Counci l reviewed and approved Municipal Code and procedure changes to shift focus to proactive enforcement with a n emphasis on strong public outreach. Per Council's direction, in November 2011, the Neighborhood Services Team (NST) met with the Police Chief and new Community Development Director to consider the involvement of neighborhood residents on the Team . After discussing several ways to keep community members meaningfully involved, it was decided that Cit y resident "neighborhood stewards" will be invited to attend monthly NST meetings led by the Neighborhoo d Services Manager and the Chief Building Official . Further discussion on community connectivity led to th e creation of monthly "Neighborhood Wellness" meetings which have been held at the Ludwick Community Cente r on the first Thursday of the month since May 2012 . Average attendance is 25 and includes a mix of residents , students, university representatives and City staff. These meetings allow for updates to be shared from Parkin g Enforcement, Community Development and Police on neighborhood wellness specific outreach and enforcement . Each meeting also allows for attendees to voice specific concerns and ask questions of staff. The Neighborhoo d Services Team is meeting quarterly to share division specific updates and offer feedback on current projects . Public Outreac h Staff received input from the neighborhood and student groups regarding the public outreach efforts . Because thi s audience is a diverse group, efforts were made to extend outreach through multiple media sources . A portion o f the Police Department's marketing contract with Verdin Marketing Inc . was used to update the websit e www .respectslo .com as well as create an "Office of Neighborhood Services" social networking page o n Facebook . Both web based sources give excellent resource information for residents . In addition, the Communit y Development Department created a user friendly brochure for the Neighborhood Services Specialists to us e during their daily outreach activities . The Police Department also created a refrigerator magnet to distribute o n campus that provides the website address to increase connectivity to the students . The Neighborhood Outreac h Manager is currently making visits to individual Cal Poly athletic teams and fraternity and sorority house s furthering sharing the message of "Respect SLO ." Finally, the Police Department is in the process of purchasin g updated graphic design software to allow for the reincarnation of the Neighborhood Services newsletter . Frequency of production will most likely be quarterly and provide yet another level of resource information to th e community. Communication with the community will be ongoing as programs achieve the greatest amount o f code compliance through education and outreach . Front Yard Parkin g The Council directed the Community Development Department staff to revise and clarify regulations regardin g where vehicles can be parked in the front yards of residences . Parking in front yards outside of the driveway ha s -I1 - BW1-17 Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – NEIGHBORHOOD WELLNES S been an ongoing issue in some neighborhoods, particularly in parking districts with a limited number of on-stree t parking permits . The new regulations will be a component of the Neighborhood Wellness Major City Goal an d enforced by the Neighborhood Services Specialists . Communication with neighborhood groups, students, an d property owners is critical to the successful implementation of the new regulations . Staff has discussed th e proposed new parking regulations and enforcement with the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC), Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN), and Cal Poly Associated Students, Inc . (ASI). A public forum wa s held at the Ludwick Center on April 4, 2012, and all property owners in the City's parking districts were invite d (over 1,100 notices were sent). The Planning Commission has discussed the issue twice, including a study sessio n in April 2011 . Front yard parking amendments were heard by the Planning Commission on April 25, 2012 and th e City Council on May 15, 2012 . Transition of Dutie s Staff discussed the timing for transition of the NEO duties from the Police Department Student Neighborhoo d Assistance Program (SNAP) program to the Community Development Department Building and Safety Division. Based on the timelines identified in the work plan, NEO transitioned from SNAP to the Neighborhood Service s Specialists in June 2012 . The Neighborhood Services Specialists are fully trained and conducting activ e enforcement in the neighborhoods . Increased Caseloa d As anticipated, the addition of two Neighborhood Services Specialists and the Neighborhood Parking Officer ha s increased the combined code enforcement case load more than 70%. Active code enforcement cases receive d from July 1, 2012 to October 1, 2012 totaled 358, up from 210 in the previous year . The numbers of self-initiated cases or cases referred by other City employees has also risen drastically . Since the beginning of the 2012-13 fiscal year, 157 cases were initiated by City staff . During the prior fiscal year, only 2 7 code enforcement cases were initiated by City staff. • • -12 -BW1-18 Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS — TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIE F TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIE F Objective . Continue efforts on projects and programs which relieve traffic congestion (like street modifications , intersection improvements, pedestrian improvements, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, trip reduction programs, traffi c signal operations, LOVR interchange, Prado Road and public transit). Action Pla n 1 . Maintain existing transit levels for local and regional services with uncertain levels of Ongoing State and Federal funding . 2 . Implement recommendation in the Short Range Transit Plan if funding is available . Ongoin g 3 . Work with Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and other transit providers to identify potential cost savings and sharing to reduce costs and improve efficiency . 4 . Explore alternative fuel and vehicle type to offset operational costs . Ongoin g • Ongoin g •1 . Use federal and state capital funding to replace and upgrade transit vehicles . Ongoing 1 . Complete minor intersection widening and restriping as part of Prefumo Creek Commons Complete Off -Site improvements . 1.Begin minor intersection widening, installation of northbound Dual Left Turn Lanes an d restriping as part of Village At Broad improvements . 2.Complete Village At Broad improvements on Broad Street . 1 . Complete and present 2010 Annual Traffic Safety Report to Council for approval . Complete 2 . Complete and present 2010/11 Biennial Traffic Operations Report to Council for approval . 6/12 Incorporated _13_ BW1-1 9 Ongoing Complete Complete Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS — TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF Current Revised I . Complete design . Complet e 2.Begin construction . 3.Complete construction . 6/12 10/1 2 12/1 2 Complete construction plans and specifications .10/12 12/1 2 2 . Complete right of way acquisition .2/13 • • Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS —TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIE F Task Current Revised r Piswo3c33u hoti ghbo ra +~-„ ,..;,.'Net'rhood w ,r~x ~?i , •1 1 ~ y~y x por,.yta it1.Q`n$an U~A Y~\A 'C~ k C{rvL J'e'4(C,y°t k 11'f hi ^3 r FJ J rt 7 M A%t5 'a*N ~e 4 iy fY B~ Y £k41P t4AilI OY t(9 N .}hy~ ....w,wl F '.'A F `t ~b j ?F 4~a!.,`^~'f1tlR`4y`1'^L ~T N'i'bh..e.. F ~~~~~~~~ ~6K fif ~l •~Y., . ~assP,,~~,'kn~v ..~~."q."Jl .~'•k..~4~ta ~iY ~SRn ..5iy'e£~".2~%a~m ~W:x ~, •1 •I 1 ¢ 63-~i'f~i3i'if..~..~~pT.,.~~e l%~y Yy~`~fi1~-Y'..}~: Q ~8 '"4 5 ff'B}a''~Y i %a'y !~~4 . • iY l q rva $'i 0 aS JP 0 y9'G~B t Y a t Y 1 1 V 1 f J X { 12/1 2 A . Obtain preliminary California Highway Patrol (CHP), Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), an d Public Utilities Commission (PUC) approvals .6/1 3 B . Obtain .final CHP, UPRR, and PUC approvals .6/1 4 2Complete project design .6/I3 12/13 -15 - BW1-2 1 Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIE F Task Current Revise d 3 .Pursue additional funding .Ongoing 1f ~geS'ea all Q~t n1WLt R '~f L 1 .Pursue outside funding for trail connections .Ongoing 2 .Complete construction drawings .9/12 12/1 2 r,;t s r gy m :t , t Jn -,t$i'a';"t',~8`7 "6 II t#dff 4agnn .B,~rn ..: 1 .Seek/obtain funding for study .Complet e 2 .Complete project study .2/1 4 3 .Pursue additional funding .Ongoing 4 .Complete project design and environmental review .TB D 5 .Complete construction drawings .TB D 6 .Complete construction . ss+~u y~.i '.^-s.1.h:15:~aL ~pl ,\du.XI i.Pik 5""'K~~IY3~p'i.'YF4C +2 "+k 3„M 4 F 4 ~t«2h<'ft TBD A §.'. 1 .Complete curb ramps, sidewalks, on-street bicycle facility paving, and striping improvements in conjunction with City street paving projects . Ongoing 2 .Implement Neighborhood Traffic Management program and projects .Ongoing 3 .Conduct bi-annual vehicle, bicycle traffic counts, speed surveys and travel time studies .Ongoing 4 .Complete miscellaneous bicycle facility improvements identified in the Bicycl e Transportation Plan, as resources permit . Ongoing 5 .Develop a list, in conjunction with the Bicycle Committee, of streets that would benefi t from increased street sweeping and coordinate with Street Maintenance to us e miscellaneous sweeping hours, when available, to increase frequency . Ongoing 6 .Seek funding for the design and construction of bikeways and pedestrian paths within th e City . Ongoin g 7 .Seek funding to educate and promote bicycling, walking and transit as alternative forms o f transportation . Ongoin g 8 .Provide more bicycle parking through the City's "Racks with Plaques" program .Ongoing Status Summary :60%Complete . The following highlights key accomplishments so far and important nex t steps : Various projects and activities have been delayed due to the extended absences of several key staff in th e Transportation division . Details on progress and delays are listed below . -16 -BW 1-22 • • • • Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS — TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIE F The Los Osos Valley Road Interchange project was delayed due to a lawsuit filed by adjacent property owners . With the lawsuit now resolved, right of way acquisitions can proceed . The construction plans are 90% complete , and appraisals for the needed property and easements are being updated . Additional traffic congestion relief efforts on Los Osos Valley Road have been completed or are currently unde r design, such as the completion of the third westbound through lane between Madonna Road and Laguna Lane an d the design progress on a left turn pocket east of Froom Ranch Way . The developer of the first residential subdivision within the Margarita Area Specific Plan has submitted publi c improvement plans for the Prado Road extension abutting the subdivision . Significant grading and drainage work has been started and the developer has submitted building permit applications for the model homes . The installation of a traffic signal at Grand and Highway 101 is complete . Circulation modifications at the intersection of Foothill and Tassajara are complete . Construction of downtown beautification improvements is complete . The Pismo and Buchon Neighborhood Traffic Management improvements have been well received by a majorit y of the public . Post project studies have shown that the traffic calming has resulted in a significant improvement . Improvements completed along the Bob Jones City-to-Sea Trail include the installation of a bridge over San Lui s Obispo Creek to provide a direct connection to the intersection of South Higuera and Prado Road . The Tank Farm/Broad intersection improvements and the mid-Higuera improvements are currently being constructed . Street paving work for 2011 and 2012 is complete . Design work is underway for 2013 Microsurfacing and Pavin g projects with construction scheduled for summer 2013 . Curb ramp and sidewalk construction is complete in Pavement Area 5 . Conversion of the traffic signals acquired through the relinquishment of Highway 227 from the State has bee n delayed due to staffs focus on other higher priority projects, as well as the long-term absence of a Signal Maintenance Technician. The biennial Traffic Operations Report is delayed due to other staff priorities, such as the Chevron project and th e Land Use and Circulation Elements Update (LUCE). This year, the report will be incorporated into the LUCE update ; independent reporting will resume after LUCE is complete . The annual Traffic Safety Report will be reduced in scope . The Bicycle Transportation Plan update has been delayed due to extended absences of several key staff an d Council direction to prioritize the development of an oversized vehicle parking ordinance . City staff has met with Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and San Luis Obispo Council of Government s (SLOCOG) staff to identify opportunities to share costs and improve efficiency . In December 2011, as a partia l follow-up to both audits, the SLOCOG Board approved setting aside $15,000 in "State Transit Assistance" fund s toward a joint scheduling project in the Central Area . On February 7, 2012, RTA, SLOCOG and City staff held a kickoff meeting for a SLO Transit Route 2/RTA Route 10 efficiencies study . Through this project, route efficiency and timing was reviewed to determine how best to coordinate services between the RTA and SL OTransit. The effort required the use of outside resources in order to gain an objective perspective on curren t coordination issues as well as to scope potential opportunities to improve service deployment . RTA was the lea d - 17 - BW1-23 Attachment 1 MAJOR CITY GOALS – TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIE F agency on this joint project ; both agencies used half of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) third quarte r funds ($7,500) towards this effort . During the course of this study, a number of options were developed for consideration . Most options include d changing SLO Route 2 to hourly frequency, adjusting when it pulses from the Downtown Transit Center (DTC ) and extending service to the South Broad Industrial area including the airport . Moving Route 2 to hourl y frequency puts the timetable on a regular frequency (more attractive to customers), slows down the route so the timetable is not so tight and allows time for additional service . As the airport has been identified as a local an d regional priority, using Route 2 to meet this need seemed a logical use of the additional available service time . SLO Transit and RTA ultimately determined that none of the scenarios developed were workable in the short ter m for the following reasons : •SLO Route 2 would be unable to easily change its pulse times as it has an important interface with SL O Route 3 at the Downtown Transit Terminal . •The City of San Luis Obispo determined that service to the South Broad Industrial Area was not in it s best interests in the short run and more rightly falls within the County's responsibility . •RTA will address its on-time issues through rerouting and minimizing stops through San Luis Obispo . Both parties agreed that a joint systems study should be initiated as early as possible to review mutual efficiencie s within the entire Central Area . The study should be done outside of the normal Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP ) study, though mutual interests and integrations should be considered when each system's SRTPs are nex t developed. City and RTA staff continue to meet on a regular basis to discuss service efficiencies that woul d benefit riders of both systems . • • -18 -BW1-24 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES – OPEN SPACE PRESERVATIO N *OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION Objective. Continue efforts to acquire, preserve, protect, and maintain open space in our greenbelt . Begin implementation of the master plan for City-owned agricultural lands at Calle Joaquin . Complete and begin implementation of the updated conservation plan for Irish Hills Natural Reserve . Prepare a Conservation Plan for Reservoir Canyon Natural Reserve . Create a plan for maintenance of Laguna Lake and Park, including potential funding . Action Plan Task Current Revise d ~~ i 3.' i I i 1 kl E t,A f I l P f 4 i~t ,~Pr~€c~atnt h.D 5 4 ~.g ~~tr V i ~~~~ ~hkd &~~ 2 Pu~r S`pa,I`'P' 1 . Continue participation in planning and acquisition efforts that at a minimum include : (a) th e Chevron Tank Farm property and adjacent open space lands ; (b) City- or Land Conservancy - held conservation easements on lands near Camp San Luis Obispo ; (c) Righetti Hill in th e Orcutt Specific Plan Area ; (d) "Upper Goldtree Vineyard Tract" lots (King an d Filipponi/Twisselman properties) above Johnson Avenue ; and (e) the Filipponi/Denbow an d Mountainbrook Church properties at the end of Calle Joaquin . Ongoing 2 . Support actions to implement the Agricultural Master Plan for the Calle Joaquin Agricultura l Reserve . Ongoing 3 . Complete Update of the Conservation Plan for Irish Hills Natural Reserve, and begi n implementation activities . Ongoing 4 . Continue implementation of elements of City adopted Conservation Plans for : Johnson Ranch; South Hills ; Stenner Springs ; and the Bob Jones Trail . Ongoing 5 . Continue efforts to improve signage, trail conditions, and environmental restoratio n programs . Ongoing 6 . Continue to participate and oversee City-sponsored or directed mitigation projects, includin g the Los Osos Valley Road interchange, Bob Jones Trail environmental enhancements, an d various private mitigation and enhancement projects throughout the City . Ongoing 7 . Continue leadership role in management of the City's natural waterways through Zone 9 projects, and provide administrative oversight to the Stormwater Management Program . Ongoing 8 . Preparation and completion of a Conservation Plan for Reservoir Canyon Natural Reserve . I S i p f J A i '.. 9 Y.Z I a4 @ Q bLOLUAII I!G ent E 1I4t y al4 1 . Conduct and complete research on public and private grant and loan sources . 64 t"^:Z ffi~m~y y Ongoing 11/1 2 2 . Identify interested parties and groups . Begin a series of public workshops to develop a community supported maintenance plan for Laguna Lake and for Laguna Lake Park as it i s affected by the maintenance plan. Develop an email group of participants and provid e electronic information updates to this group . Complete -19 - BW 1-2 5 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES – OPEN SPACE PRESERVATIO N Current Revise dTask 3 . Complete public workshops for the maintenance plan .6/12 Complete 4 . Draft the maintenance plan and begin circulation .6/12 11/1 2 5 . Presentations of Draft Plan to : Stakeholders, Parks and Recreation Commission, an d Planning Commission for review, comment, and recommendations to the City Council . 11/12 12/1 2 6 . Adoption of Maintenance Plan by Council .12/12 1/13 Status Summary :60%Complete . The following is a summary of accomplishments and important next steps for thi s goal . Acquisition, Preservation and Protection of Open Spac e 1.Staff is participating in several acquisition efforts described above which are advancing satisfactorily . Foremos t among these is the Goldtree acquisition project, which has taken a challenging new turn but is expected to b e completed by the end of the fiscal year . Also, the Righetti property easements have been completed and recorded . 2.Two grant proposals for the Bob Jones Trail extension and for several riparian enhancement projects have been submitted to State agencies . Staff continue to work with the Central Coast Agriculture Network (CCAN) to develop a management agreement for the site . This agreement is expected to be presented to Council in the nea r future . In the meantime, a hay crop has been planted there . 3.The Irish Hills Conservation Plan was approved in July 2011 . Staff has completed the jeep road decommissioning, a trail workday on November 12, 2011, and several other trail events since that time, resulti n in the opening of approximately one mile of new trails . Two grant requests have been submitted to the State o California for additional trail work funding support and for riparian restoration along Froom Creek . Staff ar e awaiting word regarding the success of these applications . 4.A mitigation basin was installed at Johnson Ranch and construction of the skills area is moving forward a t Stenner Springs . 5.New signage is currently being installed primarily at Irish Hills, and at the Highland Drive and Patricia Stree t trailheads as requested by residents . 6.Storm preparedness projects completed include : Andrews Street stormwater improvements ; Park Street sewer line replacement ; silt removal at Hollyhock Lane and Los Osos Valley Road ; and new riparian plantings along th e Bob Jones Trail . 7."Winterization" work was completed and needs for next year are being identified and compiled . A greater effor t to obtain necessary permits will be undertaken for 2012 to ensure that the silt removal work below Laguna Lak e can be undertaken this summer . 8.The Reservoir Canyon Conservation Plan is underway, with a successful public workshop held on January 31 , 2012 at the Ludwick Center . Staff is working with a Cal Poly graduate student to complete the Conservation Pla n and begin the adoption process in May 2012 . Laguna Lake Maintenance Pla n 1-2 . Research is progressing on public and private grant and loan sources for financing of the project . Staff is investigating the permitting requirements for a variety of alternative sediment removal scenarios . 3-6 . These work program items are expected to be completed on schedule . -20 - BW 1-2 6 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES — INFRASTRUCTUR E MAINTENANC E *INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANC E Objective .Increase infrastructure maintenance and investment . Sustain an effective level of core existing infrastructur e and proactively protect and maintain physical assets (such as the downtown, streets, bikeways, sidewalks, flood protectio n facilities, recreation facilities, City owned historic resources, and the urban forest). Infrastructure Maintenance is a designated Measure Y priority . Action Plan Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES — INFRASTRUCTUR E MAINTENANC E Task Current Revise d Complet e 2 .Pavement Maintenance – Year 1 & Year 2 Year 1 - Complete Year 2 - CompleteYear 2 10/1'1 3 .Sidewalk Repair – Year 1 & Year 2 Year 1 – Complet e Year 2 - 6/1 3 t ixi,e}-8k @+:A 3bP $'/k hfPE£tt tf!.r ; l'LYYH.ter-R i J t,k .£'hl $'+r d }.^s.F.},.rZ ~3[tle£i-0}ti`).i~xRP+.-Wa 'une '"~'S ( ca'ia :'Y__:~~.~£w:..tie.. j4.d }$S ±w§}'"Fvwf ui4i;..~e~A~r ~'~ti Y~~.'=#f'4R'+'Gll:a .fi/?'°CS .••5N~ £ .... a>,kf',U 1 .Laguna Lift Station 12/12 2/1 3 2 .Calle Joaquin Lift Station Replacement 12/1 3 3 .Wastewater Collection System Improvements – Year 1 & Year 2 6/12 &6/13 Year 1 - Complete Year 2–12/1 2 4 . w ~.. g t Water Reclamation Facility Major Maintenance – Year 1 & Year 2 6/12 &6/13 Year 1 - Complete t. a +t+~de r}~d~++3 3`.G~do-ytjj+ . h ' A ^,i*s #J +..,y'p ~u £'$.' i~'`' F .l {fix dt '}IX'et .u :£1$`f9;(f ei ;`•:BM %f'S8 `~ r3 `M "'£`' }`~R8N'°g{l^`xx ~"$$ 1 .Water Distribution System Improvements – Year 1 & Year 2 6/4-2-&6/13 Year 1 – Complete o$£Pt y $u'+%a"f+SILY'H ^~{ti }n'S G J 2"g,' ~ fAk^{itf193 f N3'x3{,8t}-t .p1 x ..t i~ yE b ~'J li 1 {?~ttR~."v~d ;.1 !,,£?t .! t 3 e3S"34T ti ~ 't ~3.3}S'R?`}§~'r t }~ t-3..31(C+jp .~"ss 1 .Operating program regular maintenance through : Building, Flood Control, Golf Course, Landscape & Parks Maintenance, Natura l Resources Protection, Parking Operations, Ranger Program, Reservoir Operations, Street s & Sidewalk, Swim Center, Traffic Signals & Lighting, Tree, Vehicle & Equipment , Wastewater Collection, Water Distribution, Water Reclamation Facility, Water Treatment Ongoing Status Summary :40%Complete . The following is a summary of accomplishments and important next steps for thi s goal . The Laguna Lift Station Replacement project is under construction . The Calle Joaquin Lift Station Replacement project i s 50% complete with design . A Request for Proposals (RFP) for design services was approved by Council in August 2011 , and a consultant is now under contract for both lift station projects . Construction of Calle Joaquin Lift Station has bee n rescheduled to summer 2013 because of the additional time needed for land acquisition and some unanticipated costs . Several Water Distribution System Improvements projects have been completed . The trench repair Job Order Contract i s currently in place and repairs are underway . Completion of the Water Reuse Automation Improvements is anticipated i n July 2012 . The Water Reuse Distribution Analysis is 100% complete . All project work for the 2011-12 and 2012-13 Wastewater Collection System Improvements projects is underway . November 2011, two projects began construction, one of which was combined with another project to maximiz e Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES – INFRASTRUCTUR E MAINTENANC E efficiencies in design and construction . The last project is currently being constructed and anticipated to be complete b y December 2012 . Playground equipment replacement work is completed at Meadow Park . Design work is on-going for Santa Rosa , Sinsheimer, Johnson, and Emerson parks . The Meadow Park Restroom Roof replacement is complete . Design work i s ongoing on the Warden Bridge surface replacement . Street paving work for 2011 and 2012 is complete . Design is underway for the 2013 Microsurfacing and Paving project s with construction scheduled in summer 2013 . Sidewalk work is complete in Area 5 . Work is underway in Area 6 , scheduled for resurfacing work in summer of 2013 . Chorro Street paving work is complete . Storm Drain Replacements Year 1 is finished with the completion of the storm drain work on Highland Drive . Storm Drain Replacements Year 2 is currently under construction and is estimated to finish in November 2012 . Downtown parking lot resurfacing design work is 50% complete . • - 23 -BW1-29 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES – PLANNIN G PLANNING : UPDATE LAND USE AND CIRCULATION ELEMENTS • Objective . Within the scope of the Strategic Growth Council (SGC) Grant, undertake an update of the Land Use an d Circulation Elements ; including "Healthy Cities," complete streets, and pedestrian circulation policies . Action Pla n Task Current Revise d 1 .Develop request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services Complete 2 . Program initiation – Planning Commission and Council meetings Complete 3 . Task Force formation and public participation plan Complete 4 . Background report – current program evaluation, demographics, regulatory framework , interviews, and outreach 9/12 11/1 2 5 .EIR – environmental setting/existing conditions report 9/12 11/1 2 6 . Policy updates – community workshops 11/12 2/1 3 7 .New issues, including neighborhood identification, healthy cities, greenhouse ga s reduction, pedestrian circulation, and complete streets policies and programs– communit y workshops 1/13 3/1 3 8 .Policy document – draft set of goals, policies and implementation measures 8/13 , 9 . Land use plan recommendations – community workshops 6/1 3 10 . Circulation plan recommendations – community workshops 8/1 3 11 . EIR – project description and impact analysis including a fiscal analysis for the update d elements underway . Assemble all current downtown design guidelines and standards . 12/13 Status Summary : 25% Complete . The following is a summary of accomplishments and important next steps for thi s goal . A consultant team was selected to help lead this grant-funded project and a contract was finalized in January 2012 . Council selected 17 residents to serve on a task force to provide input to the process and their first meeting was held o n April 18, 2012 . The first public workshop was on May 16, 2012, and a survey modeled after the 1988 survey wa s distributed to all addresses in the City through April and May . Collection of data and evaluation of policy status for th e elements is underway, and the web page www .s1o2035 .com has been launched to provide public access to all material s and dates associated with the effort . A neighborhood definition interactive program provided a starting point fo r neighborhood discussion and was the subject of the first community workshop . The topic of neighborhoods will be discussed in the background report . The background report chapters are being researched, assembled and then reviewe d by a city staff team and the full report is anticipated to be publicly available in November 2012 . Two workshops, a series of six open houses, and five task force meetings have been hosted where topics such a s neighborhoods, opportunities and challenges, "complete streets," survey information and the update process have bee discussed . The task force members have been active facilitators in public outreach events . A community visioni n workshop will be held in December 2012 . - 24 -BW1-3 0 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES – PLANNIN G Work extending beyond 2011-2013 is reflected in the chart below . Action Plan 2013-201 5 Task Revise dOriginal 12 . EIR– Public Review Draft Release 1/1 4 13 . Draft EIR and General Plan Update 1/1 4 14 . Public Workshops and Hearings 2/1 4 15 . DEIR – Response to comments 8/1 4 16 . Final EIR 9/1 4 17 . Final General Plan 11/14 • -25 -BW1-3 1 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES – AFFORDABLE HOUSING / HOMELESS SERVICE S AFFORDABLE HOUSING/HOMELESS SERVICES • Objective . Continue to facilitate provision of affordable as well as market-rate housing and provide leadership i n implementing the County's 10-Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness . Action Pla n Task Current Revise d 1 . Seek grants to facilitate affordable housing projects .Ongoing 2 . Work with developers to include affordable housing units in projects and to complet e housing projects in process . Ongoin g 3 . Continue to implement Housing Element programs .Ongoin g 4 . Look for new opportunities to use Affordable Housing Fund and grant monies to Leverag e other funds for affordable housing projects . Ongoin g 5 . Work with service providers and the Homeless Services Oversight Council (HSOC ) director to understand needs of homeless population . Ongoin g 6 . Continue HSOC participation to further the implementation of the 10-Year Plan .Ongoing Status Summary : 63% Complete .The following is a summary of accomplishments and important next steps for tht~ goal . Affordable Housin g On September 5, 2012, the Human Relations Commission (HRC) held its combined Grants-In-Aid (GIA) and Communit y Development Block Grant (CDBG) community needs hearing . The purpose for the hearing is to inform the public abou t upcoming funding amounts and how to apply for grants, hear community views on grant funding needs, and recommen d funding priorities . An audience of about 20 people attended the hearing and 13 speakers addressed a wide variety o f community needs . The testimony provided indicated to the Commission and staff that difficult economic condition s continue to drive an increase in service needs . Representatives from non-profits who spoke pointed to an increase in demand for services including emergency shelter, transitional housing, hunger prevention, child care, health services , affordable housing and social programs, while funding at the state and local level has significantly decreased . Th e increase in demand along with a decrease in grant funding has strained providers' ability to deliver core services . Th e service providers stressed the importance of the GIA and CDBG programs and encouraged the HRC to continue it s support . The HRC reviewed the prior year CDBG funding priorities and decided to re-affirm the priorities withou t modification . On October 2, 2012, City Council approved CDBG funding priorities as recommended by the HRC for th e 2013 Program Year . The City expects to receive approximately $506,000 in CDBG funds for the upcoming year. Staff completed several National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review clearances for the City's 201 2 CDBG Program Year projects, including ADA street improvements, Tri-Counties Housing Corporation and Habitat fo r Humanity . On March 20, 2012, Council authorized staff to apply to the State Department of Housing and Community Developm e (HCD) for Housing Related Park (HRP) grant funds . In July, HCD announced that the City was awarded the HRP gr a in the amount of $139,750 . The grant amount is based on the number of new low income housing starts in 2011 . The City 26- BW1-32 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES – AFFORDABLE HOUSING / HOMELESS SERVICE S ~ad two affordable housing projects that qualified during the designated program year, including Villages at Broad Stree t (2280 Emily Street) & Habitat for Humanity (1320 & 1324 Phillips Lane) with a total of 43 extremely-low, very-low an d low income affordable units . The HRP grant program is designed to encourge cities and counties to develop new residential housing by rewarding those jurisdictions that approve housing for low income households . Funds from thi s grant program can be used for eligible parks and recreation projects that benefit the community . Council authorized use o f the grant funds for the Santa Rosa Park playground replacement project, which will directly offset General Fun d expenditures in the 2011-2013 Financial Plan . The project includes the removal of old play equipment and sand surfacin g and installing new equiptment, as well as providing an improved drainage system and compliant safety surfacing in this heavily used playground. The preliminary estimate of construction costs is approximately $245,000 . The project i s currently in design phase with construction scheduled to being in spring 2013 and completion expected in summer 2013 . Transitions Mental Health Association (TMHA) has approached the County to purchase the Sunny Acres building an d surrounding property for a residential care facility use . The project would include a total of 35 single-room occupanc y dwellings for low income residents with mental health illnesses . Thirteen of the units would be in the Sunny Acre s building located in the Open Space land use designation on approximately 0 .6 acres . The remaining 22 units would be located in three separate buildings constructed below the Sunny Acres building in the Low Density Residential land us e designation on approximately 0 .72 acres . The County's purchase agreement will require THMA to work with the City t o preserve the building's exterior facade and ensure retention of the historic resource . On July 11, 2012, the Plannin g Commission, on a 7-0 vote, adopted a resolution that found the County's proposal in conformance with the General Plan . Staff is working the TMHA to explore various funding opportunities for pre-development costs of the facility . Staff met with numerous developers and reviewed development projects for compliance with the City's Inclusionary Housing Program. The City received its first development proposal in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan . The developmen t includes 146 dwelling units with a mix of affordability and housing types . The applicant is proposing approximately 25 % f the units as affordable to very-low, low, and moderate income households . This level of dedication far exceeds th e roject's Inclusionary Housing requirement . On October 2, 2012, Council approved an Affordable Housing Fund award for the Housing Trust Fund (HTF) in th e amount of $30,000 . The HTF provides three key services that benefit affordable housing in the City of San Luis Obispo : 1) financing, 2) technical assistance and 3) advocacy . The HTF provides funding for affordable housing projects , including property acquisition, construction and refinancing . HTF staff also serve as a resource to City staff working wit h developers on affordable housing projects . The HTF was instrumental in facilitating the property acquisition componen t of the Village at Broad Street project, a 42-unit affordable housing project developed by ROEM Corporation, with a $1 .3 million loan. The HTF has also lent $350,000 to the Housing Authority of San Luis Obispo (HASLO) to refinance th e Marvin Gardens Apartments on Laurel Lane, helping to preserve that 24-unit affordable project . In August 2011, the HT F loaned $360,000 to the Tri-Counties Community Housing Corporation to acquire three extremely-low income affordable housing units occupied by individuals with developmental disabilities on Hathway . In June 2012, the HTF committed a $400,000 loan to the South Street Family Apartments, a 43- unit affordable rental apartment project proposed by ROE M Development Corporation . This funding commitment was designed specifically to help the project be more competitiv e for tax credits — a critical funding piece of this project's feasibility . The Affordable Housing Fund award improves th e City's ability to facilitate affordable housing and provides technical assistance to City staff and developers of affordabl e housing in the City . Additionally, the award leverages significant additional funding from other sources . The 1550 Madonna Road property (120-unit affordable housing project) received 4% tax credits and tax exempt bonds t o acquire and rehabilitate the property and units . The project has received both planning and building permit approvals an d construction is expected to start in the coming weeks with completion in spring 2013 . Staff completed several property reconveyances and subordination agreements for the City's Inclusionary Housin g rogram. Since July 2012, staff expanded the Inclusionary Housing stock by securing 18 affordable rental housing units ~16 low and 2 very-low income) through long-term affordability agreements . In an effort to assist HASLO, property -27- BW1-33 Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES — AFFORDABLE HOUSING / HOMELESS SERVICE S managers, and citizens pre-screen for income and asset eligibility, staff published affordable housing rental guidelines , which are posted on the City's Housing website and available at the Community Development Department front counter . Work continued on updating Chapter 17 .90 (Affordable Housing Incentives) of the Zoning Regulations to be consisten t with State density bonus law . Staff expects to have the draft ordinance complete in winter 2013 with advisory bod y review in spring 2013 . The Community Development Department is preparing for the next Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), whic h will require an update to the City's Housing Element . The RHNA produced by the State Department of Housing an d Community Development (HCD) identifies the projected housing needs in the region as part of the periodic updating o f local housing elements of the General Plan . The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) works with staff from all seven cities and the County to distribute the regional housing assignment so that each jurisdiction can addres s their assigned units within their respective Housing Elements for the planning period January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019 . Staff will work with SLOCOG on the RHNA methodology committee as well as the community and HCD in order t o make sure the Housing Element reflects local values and state mandates so that the City can once again ensure that it s Housing Element can be certified by the state . Staff continued efforts to implement an Affordable Housing Monitoring Program . Of the City's 240 Inclusionary Housin g units, only two were determined to be out of compliance with the City's affordability agreements and Affordable Housin g Standards . In August 2012, staff met on-site with property management representatives of the apartment complex t o discuss how best to gain compliance . On October 4, 2012, staff met with the City Attomey to discuss "next steps ." Base d on follow-up discussion with property management representatives, staff is confident rents will be adjusted for the tw o outstanding units consistent with the City's Affordable Housing Standards in the coming weeks . Homeless Services • On March 20, 2012, the City Council temporarily suspended enforcement of the requirements of Municipal Code Chapte r 17 .16 .015 (Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit) and authorized Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obisp o County, Inc . (CAPSLO) to operate a safe shelter pilot program for up to five vehicles for a portion of property located a t 43 Prado Road . Council also directed staff to return within six months of program implementation to report on the succes s of the pilot program and consider changes to the Municipal Code to establish a permanent safe shelter ordinance . On June 22, 2012, CAPSLO implemented the six month pilot program that provides homeless persons with vehicles a safe place t o temporarily park overnight with the goal of eventually transitioning them into permanent housing . On October 2, 2012 , staff presented Council with findings from the pilot program and received direction regarding a permanent program . In summary, the pilot program is accomplishing its goal of providing a safe place for those living in their vehicles to slee p while working towards transitioning into permanent housing . Staff found that the pilot program has operated at or near th e five vehicles capacity since initiated and program requirements have not deterred interest ; participants have demonstrate d progress towards securing permanent housing, and there was one Police call for service that resulted in an arrest . Based o n Council direction to develop a permanent safe shelter ordinance, staff will : 1) continue to monitor the safe shelter pilo t program for lessons learned (ongoing); 2) engage residents and stakeholders through a series of round table discussion s and community workshops (fall 2012); 3) draft the ordinance (winter 2013); 4) facilitate the public hearing process an d advisory body review (winter 2013); and 5) bring the ordinance to Council for review and consideration (spring 2013). Staff is an active participant on the Homeless Services Working Group . This group is made up of representatives from th e County, City and local social service providers . The group meets on a regular basis to discuss homeless issues an d opportunities to better coordinate our approach to fill gaps in homeless services . Staff also meets regularly with CAPSL O staff to discuss the design, layout and programs proposed for the new Homeless Services Center . Staff is actively involved with the 2013 Homeless Enumeration Report . The purpose of the report is to understand t1 4 extent and nature of homelessness, which allows the community to plan for needed programs and services, and to provide Attachment 1 OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVES — AFFORDABLE HOUSING / HOMELESS SERVICE S ata for required reporting to HUD . Staff is working with CAPSLO and a consultant team to make appropriate changes t o some of the questions in the report to get relevant data on the City's homeless population and tailor services and program s to address current needs . • - 29 -BW1-35 Attachment 1 ADDRESS AS RESOURCES PERMI T The following provides brief status reports on "Addres s as Resources Permit" objectives for 2011-13 . Climate Protectio n Objective .Implement greenhouse gas reduction an d Climate Action Plan . Conduct energy audits of all City facilities, increase energy conservation, invest i n infrastructure which will save energy and funds in the future . Status Summary: 75%Complete . The Utilities Department is working on an energ y efficiency project at the Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) that partners with Pacific Gas and Electri c (PG&E) to reduce energy consumption, operating costs and greenhouse emissions . In January 2012, Counci l approved agreements with PG&E to complete a stud y and a portion of the design for energy efficienc y measures at the WRF . Staff will return to Council i n early 2013 with a recommendation for this project base d on the completed study and preliminary design . In addition, the Council approved a Climate Action Pla n in July 2012 after substantial outreach and Plannin g Commission review and revision . Parks and Recreatio n Objective .Increase utilization of Damon-Garcia Sports Fields . Status Summary :85% Complete . To address this Council objective, staff first established a project team in spring 2011 . The project team consists of staff from Parks and Recreation and Public Work s departments, members of the Parks and Recreatio n Commission, and representatives from both Youth an d Adult Turf Sports. The project team has met bi-monthl y since May of 2011 . The project team's first step was t o create a project plan with four main objectives : determine current field usage (including maintenance); determine ways to increase play ; identify short term strategies ; and identify longer term strategies . Based o n permit records, the use of the Damon Garcia Sport s Fields during calendar year 2010 was analyzed . For the calendar year 2010, staff found that 1,395 hours of pla t by youth was scheduled, 419 .5 hours by adults, 5,4 8r hours were needed for maintenance (including closure s for restoration), and 31 days of play were rained out . 47,388 people were estimated to have been on the field s as spectators or participants . Following the analysis of field usage, the project team determined that a stand of Bermuda grass should b e planted on a portion of a field to determine definitively i f it could (a) grow successfully in our cooler climate an d (b) determine if it was more durable and therefore woul d result in less restoration time for the facilities longe r term . The grass was planted during this summer's renovation and a final determination of its success and failure will occur in spring 2012 . Also following the analysis of field usage, additional hours of play hav e been scheduled for 2011-12 . Ultimate Frisbee (fo r adults) has been added as has Lacrosse (for adults). Organized drop-in play was tested in the fall of 2011 , occurring on Tuesdays from 12-2 p .m . With positiv e feedback from participants and staff, Thursday 12-2 p .m . drop-in play was also added to the schedule . Approximately 30 players are participating in thi s opportunity . Beginning in November 2011, a Thurs d night practice for club soccer teams was added a another test for expanded play . These additional hours o f play were based on a survey of over 125 users and non - users of the facility who staff sought information fro m about their use to better maximize facility usage . To increase awareness of field uses and to better serv e the public, a Google calendar has been created for th e fields so that users can have ready access to th e scheduled play at the facility . Staff continues to : monitor field conditions ; survey (every other month ) users about field conditions ; and expand use of othe r facilities in the community for turf sports . As a result o f the additional uses described above for 2011-12 , permitted uses and additional drop-in and practice use s increased by 298 hours of permitted play (50 hours fo r youth and 248 hours for adults). This totaled a 16 % increase from the prior year's previously scheduled play . In mid-May 2012, the Damon Garcia Sports Fields was closed for its annual renovation . Prior to that closure,a final survey of field conditions was taken by users t o assist in the ongoing maintenance of the facility . Play for the 2012-13 season has begun with the re-opening o f renovated facility in August . Play levels are about same as last season with a few increases in youth Attachment 1 ADDRESS AS RESOURCES PERMI T practices on Tuesday and Thursday nights (new) an d ork with an additional adult soccer league to also pla y nights . Staff and the ad hoc committee member s continue to work to identify opportunities for additiona l turf in the City. As always, the ideal balance betwee n maintenance and use at Damon Garcia Sports Field s continues be sought . Historic Preservatio n Objective .Continue to promote historic resourc e preservation opportunities and update Historic Resourc e Inventory . Status Summary : 50% Complete . The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) has bee n conducting historic survey work of a 10-block are a adjacent to the Old Town and Railroad Histori c Districts . This survey is the first of several that will bring the Citywide historic resources inventory up t o date . The CHC sent letters to property owners and received input at several meetings regarding the proces s and how to proceed with the survey . The CHC organized a subcommittee consisting of CH C members and Community Development staff to assis t with the survey work . Detailed workbooks with Stat e Historic Survey forms, guidelines, architectural details and training materials were provided to the sub - committee members to assist with the work effort . Th e CHC hearings in October through December 2011 were utilized to review survey results and identify potentia l historic resources Seventy (70) properties within th e survey area are currently being examined for potentia l listing . The CHC will forward the final survey results along with recommendations for historic listings to th e City Council in winter 2012 . In December 2011, the City Council adopted a resolution to allow the City to move forward with a n application to become a Certified Local Government (CLG). The CLG program facilitates a partnershi p between the City and the State Office of Histori c Preservation (OHP), allowing for technical assistance , grant funding and collaboration . The application wa s accepted by OHP and approved in May 2012 . Thi s enabled the City to apply for grant funding during th e 2012 grant cycle to develop a historic context for th e city including a mid-century theme . The City wa s warded a $22,500 grant for this purpose and solicited -31 - BW 1-3 7 bids . Three proposals were received . These bids will b e screened and evaluated, and a consultant hired by th e beginning of November 2012 . Attachment 1 CARRYOVER GOALS AND OBJECTIVE S The following summarizes the status of "carryover " Other Important Council Objectives from the 2009-1 1 and 2007-09 Financial Plans . In several cases , "carryover tasks" have been incorporated into the Majo r City Goals (or "Other Important Council Objectives") for 2011-13, and as such, they are not repeated in thi s section . OTHER IMPORTANT COUNCIL OBJECTIVE S Creek and Flood Protectio n Objective.Advance Mid-Higuera flood protectio n improvements by seeking Zone 9 funding to complet e design, obtain approvals and make progress towar d construction as resources will allow. Status Summary : 25% Complete.As recommende d by the Zone 9 committee, the Board of Supervisor s approved additional funding for preliminary design wor k to accompany the already completed technical studie s necessary for the environmental document . Th e preliminary design work for the Mid-Higuera bypas s flood control project, sponsored by Zone 9, is underway . The preliminary design has been presented to Zone 9 and at that time Zone 9 requested an increased projec t scope . City staff is working with County staff to develo p a revised project scope and additional funding t o complete the preliminary design . If additional funding i s provided through Zone 9, the anticipated completio n date for the preliminary design work is September 2013 . Staff will continue to move this project forward a s resources permit . Skatepark Objective .Develop plans and specifications and see k funding to construct a skate park . Status Summary :90% Complete .The skate park has received all of its discretionary approvals by City advisory bodies . The project is now in the final stage s and 90% construction ready plans are presently unde r review by City staff . In September 2011, staff submitted grant applications for Proposition 84 funding (2008 Statewide Par k Development and Community Revitalization Program ) in the amount of $1 .27 million and to the Stewardship Council Infrastructure Fund for $200,000 . The City w not awarded either grant . Staff continue efforts to rai s funds for the project through a variety of fundraiser s including the ongoing "Buy a Brick Build a Dream " campaign for the park . Airport Area Annexatio n Objective . Annex the Airport Area . Status Summary : 100% Complete for Phase IA . The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO ) completed the annexation process for 626 acre s associated with Phase IA of the annexation area . Th e map and certificate of annexation was delivered to th e State Board of Equalization and the land was officiall y added to the City boundary on July 25, 2008 . Discussion with property owners in the Phase 1B are a was conducted in early 2009 . The propose d development of the Chevron property will result in a n amendment to the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP). That project is in the Environmental Impact Repor t (EIR) preparation stage and City and County staff ar e collaborating in the review of the project . T administrative draft of the EIR, along with the scope o work for a financing plan, is underway . Annexation o f the Chevron property will provide another key piece o f the Airport Area annexation. Discussions with LAFC O staff have indicated that LAFCO would prefer the Cit y pursue annexation of the entire remaining area includin g the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport, bu t would support phased annexations as needed . This issue is significant because several areas of the AASP are no t contiguous to existing City boundaries and the only way to bring those properties into the City will be to addres s the airport property itself. Including the airport may significantly alter the timing anticipated for Phase 1B . Broad Street Corridor Plan Objective .Adopt and implement a plan for South Broa d Street corridor planning and improvements . Status Summary : 80% Complete .The plan has been significantly revised after further evaluation revealed that overall densities associated with reducin g development to address traffic impacts, would result i n less development than currently allowed . Utilities st a worked with Wallace Group to evaluate waste collecti o - 32 - BW 1-38 Attachment 1 CARRYOVER GOALS AND OBJECTIVE S system capacity to ensure orderly development coul d ccur. Staff revised the draft plan to achieve the projec t goal of mixed use and infill development . An Airport Land Use Commission sub-committee reviewed the draf t plan with the project planner to assist with Airpor t density compliance determination . The infill densitie s envisioned appear to trigger significant traffic impacts a t various intersections . Evaluation of project impacts wil l occur with the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the General Plan update . Staff anticipate s distributing the revised draft in winter 2013 fo r conceptual review by the public and the Plannin g Commission . • - 33 -BW1-39 Attachment 1 STATUS OF MAJOR CIP PROJECT S 2012-13 : First Updat e As of October 1 . 201 2 Percent Complete 0%10%20%30%40%50%e0%70%90%€0% 100% UNDER CONSTRUCTIO N Tank Farm Widening - Broa d Stonudrain Replacements (2012-13 ) Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing (2012-13) Laguna Lift Station Replacement • UNDER DESIGN _ City Hall Step Replacemen t Marsh Street Garage Paintin g Warden Bridge Repair - Mission Plaz a Santa Rosa Skate Par k Railroad Safety Trail Construction - Hathway to - Tait Playground Equipment Replacement - Johnson , Santa Rosa, Emerson Parks Gateway Monument - Santa Rosa & Highlan d Downtown Directional Signs Installatio n Cade Joaquin Lift Station & Forcemai n Replacement Bob Jones Bridge Construction - LOVR Water Reclamation Facility Energy Efficienc y Projects Water Reuse Automaton [improvement s UNDER STUDY _ Website Upgrade -34 -BW 1-40 • Attachment 2 ATTACHMENT 2 Status Report o n General Plan Implementation Program s November 201 2 city of san Luis omsp o BW1-41 Attachment 2 Status of General Plan Implementation Program s TABLE OF CONTENTS • Introductio n Overview 1 Status of General Plan and Area Plan Implementation Programs 1 Report Organization 2 Findings 3 Status of General Plan Implementation Programs by Elemen t Land Use Element 7 Housing Element 9 Circulation Element 1 3 Conservation and Open Space Element 1 5 Noise Element 1 9 Safety Element 2 0 Parks and Recreation Element 2 1 Water and Wastewater Element 2 2 Status of Area Plan Implementation Program s Orcutt Area Specific Plan 24 • Mid-Higuera Area 2 9 Railroad District 3 1 Airport Area Specific Plan 3 4 Margarita Area Specific Plan 3 6 Long Range Division Work Assignments 42 BW1-4 2 • Attachment 2 INTRODUCTIO N OVERVIE W The purpose of this report is to provide a concise yet comprehensive summary of the status of al l General Plan implementation programs as well as implementation programs for key "area" plans : Downtown, Mid-Higuera Area, and Railroad District Area . This report also covers action item s and the status of efforts in the Airport Area, Margarita Area and Orcutt Area Specific Plans . STATUS OF GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S The following schedules provide a concis e yet comprehensive summary of the status o f all General Plan implementation programs . As discussed in greater detail below, of th e 448 individual implementation programs i n the General Plan, 81% (362) of them ar e completed or have been integrated into th e City's ongoing operations . This is a fiv e percent increase of implemented program s since the last Financial Plan reporting . Given the ambitious nature of our General Plan and its twenty-year time horizon, w e believe that this represents significan t progress in achieving General Plan goals . The incomplete programs (19% of the total) are classified as follows : ■1% (5) as being relatively easy to achieve from a resource perspective . ■12 .5% (56) as being of moderate difficulty . ■5 .5% (25) as being difficult to achieve . Report Focus : Why Report on the Status of Programs?The City's General Plan is compose d of a "building block" hierarchy of goals, objectives, policies and programs . Goals and objectives are direction-setters . They describe desirable conditions and preferred outcomes as they ar e applied to specific situations . Goals are generally not quantifiable, time-dependent or suggestiv e of specific actions for their achievement . Objectives generally state an intermediate step towar d attaining a goal . Policies are typically more specific statements that guide decision-making . Programs are actions that implement goals, objectives and policies . As such, monitoring ou r progress in implementing General Plan programs is an excellent way of monitoring our progres s in achieving General Plan goals and objectives . And for this reason, it is the focus of this report . - 1 - BW1-4 3 Status of General Plan Implementation Program s O High Difficulty 5 .5% Attachment 2 INTRODUCTIO N Report Organization • General Plan Elements .The report first organizes each of the implementation programs int o one of our eight General Plan elements : ■Land Use (LU)■Noise (N ) ■Housing (H)111 Safety (S ) ■Circulation (CI)■Parks and Recreation (PR ) ■Conservation and Open Space (COSE)■Water and Wastewater (WW) Implementation Program Summary. A short "one-line" narrative is provided for eac h implementation program, referencing the specific General Plan Program number . (Each program is assigned a "line number" solely for easy internal reference within the report itself ) Lead Department .The lead responsible for implementing the program is presented . (In man y cases, several departments work closely together in implementing the program ; this simpl y indicates which department has the lead role in coordinating program implementation .) ■Administration (ADM) ■ Parks and Recreation (P&R) ■Community Development (CD) ■ Police (PD ) ■Finance & Information Technology (F&IT) ■ Public Works (PW ) ■Fire (FD) ■ Utilities (UT) Implementation Status .All programs are organized into one of two major "status" categories : q If it's complete (or will be complete by June 2013) or has been integrated into Cit y operations as an ongoing program, this is noted with a "C" (complete) or an "0" (ongoing) i n the first status column of the summary . For easy reference, within each element, complete d programs are listed first in the summary, followed by those that are ongoing . ©If it won't be completed (or become an ongoing program) by June 2013, then we have rate d how difficult it will be to complete on an "order of magnitude" (qualitative) basis using the following coding : Low (L): Minimal staff effort and no consultant assistance will be needed to complete th e analytical work and coordinate stakeholder-public outreach . While this is a qualitative assessment by the lead department, this generally means that less than 80 hours of staff wor k and no additional budget resources will be needed to implement the program . Medium (M):Significant staff effort, some consultant assistance or supplemental fundin g for operations or capital projects will be needed to complete the analytical work an d coordinate stakeholder-public outreach or implement the program . Again, while this is a qualitative assessment by the lead department, this generally means between 80 to 500 hour s of staff work and/or up to $25,000 for added budget resources will be needed to implemen t the program . BW1-44 • Attachment 2 INTRODUCTIO N •High (H):Major staff effort, consultant assistance or supplemental funding for operations o r capital projects will be needed to complete the analytical work, coordinate stakeholder-publi c outreach or implement the program . Generally, this means that more than 500 hours of staf f work and/or more than $25,000 for added budget resources will be needed to implement th e program . For easy reference, within each element, the incomplete programs follow those that ar e complete/ongoing, with the "low" difficulty programs listed first, followed by those that ar e "medium and high ." Area Plans ."Area plans" like the Railroad District Plan are not General Plan Elements . However, each of the area plans adopted by the Council that have "implementation programs"— Mid-Higuera Street Enhancement Plan, Railroad District Plan, Airport Area Specific Plan , Margarita Area Specific Plan and Orcutt Area Specific Plan — are closely linked to the Genera l Plan implementation . Accordingly, the status of "area plan" implementation programs is als o provided in this report . They are organized in the same manner as the status report on Genera l Plan program implementation . The Downtown Concept Plan is a graphical document wit h supporting guidance . This plan is summarized in narrative format on page 5 . Finding s General Plan Program s Status Summary.As noted above, 81% of the City's General Plan implementation program s have been completed or integrated into the City's day-to-day operations . The following is a mor e detailed summary of the status of General Plan implementation programs by element : Summary : Status of General Plan Implementation Program s General Plan Element Complete o r Ongoing Difficulty to Complete TotalLowMediumHigh No.Pct .No .Pct.No .Pct .No .Pct. Land Use 54 74%0 0%12 16%7 10%7 3 Housing 47 60%2 3%28 36%1 1%7 8 Circulation 51 78%2 3%7 11%5 8%6 5 Conservation & Open Space 106 90%0 0%6 5%6 5%11 8 Noise 4 100%0 0%0 0%0 0%4 Safety 33 97%0 0%1 3%0 0%3 4 Parks and Recreation 36 93%0 0%0 0%3 7%3 9 Water and Wastewater 31 84%1 3%2 5%3 8%3 7 TOTAL 362 81%5 1%56 12 .5%25 5 .5%448 As reflected above, there are very few "low effort" programs remaining . Resource Requirements .Based on our qualitative assessment of the resources need t o complete the implementation of the remaining programs, the following is a "high-level " assessment of the staff resources and added budget resources that will ultimately be needed t o complete these programs at some point : • BW1-4 5 Attachment 2 INTRODUCTIO N High-Level Resource Assessmen t Remaining Programs FM's*and/or Consultant Cost s min max mm max Low Difficulty 5 0 0 .23 $ -$ - Medium 56 2 .59 16 .17 $ -$ 1,400,000 High 25 7 .22 7 .22+$ 625,000 $ 625,000 + Total 86 9 .81 23 .62 +$ 625,000 $2,025,000 + *Annual Full-time Equivalent (FTE ) Value of Remaining Action Items .These summaries show which programs remain undone an d the "order of magnitude" resources that would be needed to complete them . However, they d o not address their relative value to the community compared with the effort that would b e required to complete them . For example, it might be tempting to direct our resources t o finishing-up the "low or medium difficulty" programs to get them off our plate . However, thi s should be weighed against the value likely to be derived . In this case, we might have a greate r impact in improving the community's quality of life if we focused the same level of resource s towards accomplishing a fewer number of "high value" (but relatively higher effort) programs . On the other hand, we would want to avoid undertaking high-effort but lower-value programs . The following is a paradigm or model for assessing these "value versus effort" trade-offs, whic h can be summarized as follows in the context of allocating resources towards completing Genera l Plan programs : Quadrant A Low Effort, High Value Quadrant B Low Effort, Low Valu e Quadrant C Quadrant D High Effort, High Value High Effort, Low Value High Low VALU E In this model, the first priorities should be selected from Quadrant A : "low effort but high value ." (These are the proverbial "low hanging fruit .") After this, Quadrants B and C are a "toss - up ." However, in all cases, we would want to minimize efforts towards programs that might fal l BW1-4 6 0J • • Attachment 2 INTRODUCTIO N • into Quadrant D, unless the community or decision makers think that there is greater value tha n the weight assigned by City staff . Ultimately, assessing the value of individual programs and directing resources toward s completing them is the Council's decision (and in the final analysis, this is what the City's goal - setting and budget process is all about). However, staff can prepare an "order of magnitude " assessment of those programs we believe would have the most near-term benefits relativel y quickly if the Council believes that this would be helpful background information in the goal - setting process . Area Plans Railroad District Plan Program s Ten of the forty-one Railroad District Plan implementation programs have been completed o r integrated into ongoing programs . Of the remaining thirty-one programs that are not ye t complete, we have classified two of them as "medium" difficulty and twenty-nine as "high ." Several of the programs that call for bike paths along the railroad right-of-way may need to b e adjusted to reflect the inability to achieve easements from the Union Pacific Railroad . Mid-Higuera Area Enhancement Plan Programs While work has been done toward implementation, none of the twenty-four programs set forth in • this long term plan have been completed . We have classified two of the twenty-four program s that are not yet complete as "medium" difficulty and twenty-two of them as "high ." Downtown Concept Pla n The General Plan provides policies and programs for all areas of the City including a specifi c section in the Land Use Element regarding the Downtown . The Downtown Concept Plan is a graphical map with principles that has long been used to guide decisions regarding developmen t in the Downtown . This document is referenced in the Land Use Element (4 .0) as an illustration of how Downtown development may occur but was never envisioned as a static document, rathe r more of a vision concept . Some of the concepts are being pursued with review and approval o f private development . Others require City resources and action, and some concepts may chang e or be adapted as part of the Land Use and Circulation Elements update process . Airport Area Specific Plan Programs Of the twenty-nine programs set forth in this plan, twenty have been integrated into ongoin g programs . We have classified one of the remaining nine programs that are not yet complete a s "low" difficulty, two of them as "medium" and six as "high ." This Specific Plan is undergoin g an update as part of the Chevron Remediation and Redevelopment proposal and some of thes e programs will be updated as part of the process . Margarita Area Specific Plan The Margarita Area Specific Plan was adopted in October 2004 and accommodates 838 dwellin g units and about 900,000 square feet of business park development . Three subdivisions have bee n BW1-47 Attachment 2 INTRODUCTIO N approved for a total of approximately 300 residential lots, and several commercial development s have been approved . Many of the programs listed in the plan are dependent upon actua l construction taking place since they will be implemented with development ; however, two of th e 86 programs have been completed : the dedication of the South Street Hills and the constructio n of the Damon-Garcia Sports Field complex . Recent changes to the fee program were undertake n to clarify parkland fee structure and to re-assign a portion of parkland payment responsibility t o the community at large to reflect the community-wide benefit of the Damon-Garcia Sports fields . Orcutt Area Specific Pla n The Orcutt Area Specific Plan was approved in 2010 and accommodates nearly 1,000 ne w residential units and some 15,000 square feet of commercial retail space . The area was annexe d to the City in November 2011 . None of the 93 programs identified has yet to be complete d because the programs specify conditions that will be accomplished by development occurring i n the area. The programs are listed as "ongoing' because the programs will apply to an y development in the area once it is annexed and subdivision and development proposals ar e submitted . \Achstore4\Team\Budget Folders\2013-15 Financial PlanACouncil Goal-Setting\12-18-12 Goal-Setting Process Counci l Meeting\Status of General Plan Implementation Programs, 2011-13 .docx • • BW1-48 • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S Status of General Plan Implementation Program s . ,'STATUS'AS OF October , Program 2012 Leask DeptSummary,; Com p Or 'Ongoin Difficulty to `Complete Low z Med Hig F Land Us e 2 .14 Consider new regulations for accessory buildings (L U 2 .14 .(3)) C C D 3 .9 Rezone neighborhood uses in C-S (LU 3 .9 .3)C C D 6 .4 Revise engineering standards to allow for porous pavin g and landscaping (LU 6 .4 .5) C P W 2 .15 Provide staff support for neighborhood issues (LU 2 .15 .F)C C D 3 .6 Add warehouse stores to Zoning Regulations . (L U 3 .6 .2 .B) C C D 3 .6 Add R&D facilities to Zoning Regulations (LU 3 .6 .2 .D)C C D 3 .9 Provide incentives to encourage relocation of auto sale s (LU 3 .9 .8) C C D 3 .9 Noise prevention in Zoning Regulations, architectura l guidelines (LU 3 .9 .9/N) C C D 6 .0 Prepare a refined land use map for the City and it s planning areas (LU 6 .0 .3) C C D 2 .16 Revise residential density determination method fo r Medium, Med-High & High land use districts (LU 2 .16) C C D 3 .9 Revise zoning & architectural standards to protec t character of downtown areas (LU 3 .9 .7) C C D 4 .2 Revise zoning regulations to require large new project s downtown to include dwellings (LU 4 .2 .1) C - C D 1 .7 Encourage County to adopt cluster districts (LU 1 .7 .4)C AD M 1 .15 City-County MOU regarding SLO Planning Area (L U 1 .15 .8) C - AD M 2 .10 Review and, if necessary, revise noise, propert y development, & maintenance standards (LU 2 .10 .1) C C D 2 .10 Adopt property maintenance standards (LU 2 .10 .2)C C D 2 .13 Affordable housing inclusionary fee requirements (L U 2 .13) C C D 2 .14 Consider new regulations for large infill houses (LU 2 .14 . (1),(2)) C - C D 3 .9 Investigate ways to intensify and improve cohesion a t existing Madonna Road centers (LU 3 .9 .10) C AD M 3 .9 Eliminate PD minimum site area for commercial zones (L U 3 .9 .2) C - C D 4 .2 Develop & apply a "Residential-Office" zone in th e downtown (LU 4 .2 .2) C C D 5 .7 Study possible reuse of surplus City facilities by cultura l and non-profit groups (LU 5 .7) C AD M 5 .8 Encourage public art in all projects (LU 5 .8)C AD M6.3 Designate sensitive sites and require ARC review durin gsubdivision process (LU 6 .3 .1) C ADM -7 -BW1-4 9 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 7 .13 Establish in-lieu fee to protect airport area OS whe n .rotection not feasible with project approval (LU 7 .13) C C D 7 .8 Work with Airport Area property owners to complete a -pecific plan (LU 7 .8) C C D 8 .4 Work with property owners to prepare area plans for Sant a Barbara Street area (LU 8 .4) C C D 8 .5 Consider enhancement of Mid-Higuera Area (LU 3 .1 .4 ) see also Special Design Area 8 .5) C C D 1 .15 Work with County to make SLO Area Plan consistent w / ity LU (LU 1 .15 .7) 0 - C D 1 .10 Monitor nonresidential growth rate : (LU 1 .10 .4)0 C D 1 .15 Discuss feasibility of countywide planning group (L U 1 .15 .4) 0 AD M 1 .15 Promote inter-jurisdictional review of countywide project s LU 1 .15 .5) 0 AD M 1 .15 Monitor County Resource Management Reports (L U 1 .15 .1) 0 C D 1 .15 Advocate annual meetings among local jurisdictions t o . iscuss regional issues (LU 1 .15 .2) 0 C D 1 .15 Advocate regional growth management program (L U 1 .15 .6) 0 - C D 2 .1 Support formation & continuation of neighborhoo d .fanning groups (LU 2 .1 .2) 0 C D 2 .10 Periodically review & update prop . maintenance standard s LU 2 .10 .2) 0 C D 2 .1 Promote neighborhood traffic calming (LU 2 .1 .3 ./CE)0 P W 2 .10 Review, revise property maintenance and developmen t -tandards (LU 2 .10 .1) 0 C D 2 .15 Undertake focused review, improvement, & enforcemen t fforts for neighborhoods (LU 2 .15 .C) 0 C D 2 .15 Provide early neighborhood notice of project reviews (L U r .15 .E) 0 C D 3 .9 Develop aggressive marketing programs for tourism (L U c .9 .11 .C) 0 AD M 3 .9 Encourage development of recreation facilities (L U c .9 .11 .E) 0 AD M 3 .9 Consider establishing tourist information at City entrie s LU 3 .9 .4) 0 AD M 3 .9 Develop tour concepts (LU 3 .9 .11 .D)0 AD M 4 .16 Review allowed building heights in retail areas & outsid e he Commercial Core (LU 4 .16 .4 LU 4 .18) 0 - C D 4 .19 Include Downtown Concept Plan features in zonin g egulations, architectural guidelines, engineering standard s : capital improvement plans (LU 4 .19) 0 - C D 6 .0 Develop resource maps (LU 6 .0 .2)0 ADM 6 .3 Mitigate visual impacts of hillside houses includin g onsidering revising method for determining building heigh t LU 6 .3 .4) 0 C D 6 .5 Notify creekside property owners in advance of work alon g reeks (LU 6 .5 .3) 0 PW 7 .11 Work with County to assure airline service at Airpor t onsistent with Circulation Element (LU 7 .11) 0 CD -8 BW 1-50 • • • • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 7 .3 Actively pursue annexation of the Airport Area (LU 7 .3)0 C D 7 .7 Expanded transit service to development sites in Airpor t Area concurrent with development (LU 7 .7) 0 PW 8 .3 Work with property owners to prepare area plans for Broa d Street area (LU 8 .3) 0 _ C D 2 .11 Revise apartment standards to include usable open spac e (LU 2 .11 .2)M C D 2 .12 Consider special downtown dev standards : New residential density category between low & medium (L U 2 .12 .A)M C D 2 .1 Identify, designate, and plan neighborhoods (LU 2 .1 .1 , 2 .15 .A)M C D 2 .11 Evaluate student housing needs, revise City standards & zoning as appropriate (LU 2 .11 .1)M C D 2 .12 Consider special downtown dev standards : Added dwellings on lots with existing houses (LU 2 .12 .B)M C D 2 .12 Consider special downtown development standards : Mas s & spacing standards (LU 2 .12 .C)M C D 2 .12 Consider special downtown dev standards : Parking & coverage standards (LU 2 .12 .D)M C D 2 .12 Consider special downtown residential standards (L U 2 .12)M C D 2 .15 Devise strategies to stabilize owner/rental ratio an d maintain neighborhood character (LU 2 .15 .B)M C D 3 .7 Offer new development incentives for providing child an d elder care for employees (LU 3 .7 .1)M C D 4 .2 Survey downtown, rezone office, residential, and mixe d use areas (LU 4 .2 .2)M C D 5 .3 Work with the County to develop a City-County downtow n ?pace needs plan (LU 5 .3)M P W 1 .15 Plans capacity summary COG (LU 1 .15 .3)-H C D 4 .2 Develop a TDC program that includes Commercial Cor e Droperties as receiver sites (LU 4 .2 .1)H C D 6 .0 Re-evaluate LU map based upon resource mapping an d revise as appropriate (LU 6 .0 .3)H C D 6 .3 Revise Zoning Regulations to include provisions for TDC's from outside URL to within URL (LU 6 .3 .2)H C D 6 .5 Removal man-made obstructions from creek channels (L U 3 .5 .1 .C)H P W 8 .1 Work with property owners to prepare area plans fo r .Aadonna Road regional shopping area (LU 8 .1)H C D 8 .2 Work with property owners to prepare area plans fo r Foothill Boulevard area (LU 8 .2)H C D Housing 1 .4 Provide financial assistance for rehabilitation of affordabl e rental and ownership units using Federal, state and loca l housing funds (HE1 .4) 0 C D 1 .5 Continue Code enforcement to expedite removal o f (legal/unsafe dwellings (HE 1 .5) 0 C D 1 .6 Enact a rental inspection program to improve condition o f housing stock (HE1 .6) 0 CD -9 -BW1-5 1 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S O C D M C D M C D M C D 0 C D 0 C D 0 C D 0 C D 0 C D 0 C D M C D 0 C D 0 C D M C D M C D 0 C D M C D 0 C D 0 CD 3 .10 Identify properties eligible for historic listing and assis t property owners to repair, rehabilitate properties (HE 3 .10) 0 C D 3 .11 Amend Inclusionary requirements to allow reduced ter m for rehabilitated units (HE 3 .11)M C D 3 .12 Establish a monitoring system to track affordable units a t risk of conversion (HE 3 .12) 0 C D 3 .13 Encourage rehab of residential, commercial or industria l buildings to expand rental housing opportunities (HE 3 .13) 0 - C D 4 .5 income Review new development for compliance with mixed - policies (HE 4 .5) 0 C D 2 .19 Evaluate increasing residential densities on appropriat e pites for housing affordable to extremely low incom e households (HE 2 .19 ) 2 .1 2 2 .15 Provide technical assistance to help preserve at-risk unit s (HE 2 .15 ) 2 .16 Provide technical assistance to developers re : desig n strategies to achieve affordable housing (HE 2 .16 ) 2 .11 If outside funding sources found, exempt moderate incom e dwellings from impact fees (HE 2 .11). Maintain curren t exemption for low to extremely low income units . 3 .9 Preserve dwellings in Downtown Core (HE 3 .9 ) 3 .7 Develop an ordinance to discourage removal of affordabl e housing (HE 3 .7 ) 3 .8 Correct unsanitary or unsafe housing conditions b y collaborating with agencies offering rehab programs (H E 3 .8 ) 2 .6 2 .8 2 .5 1 .7 Continue to support local & regional solutions t o homelessness by funding programs such as Maxine Lewi s nd Prado Center(HE1 .7 ) 1 .8 Create educational campaign to encourage owners o f older residences to conduct seismic upgrades (HE 1 .8 ) Pursue outside funding for payment of City impact fees fo r affordable units (HE2 .10 ) Help coordinate public/private sector actions to develo p housing to meet city needs (HE 2 .12) a Amend inclusionary requirement to provide more ways fo r Commercial development to meet requirements (HE 2 .5 ) Review existing standards to remove regulations tha t inhibit affordable housing production (HE 2 .8 ) Prepare Criteria to sustainably manage the Affordabl e Housing Fund (HE 2 .6 ) Establish pemit streamlining for affordable housin g p rojects (HE2 .9) Evaluate Inclusionary requirements and ability to develo p housing that meets RHNA (HE 2 .17 ) 2 .1 7 2 .18 Evaluate workforce level of affordability (HE 2 .18 ) Assist with financial tools to develop or preserve affordabl e housing (HE 2 .13 ) 2 .13 Adjust affordable housing standards to address HOA fees , utilities, etc . (HE 2 .14 ) 2 .1 4 2 .9 2 .10 • • • -10 -BW1-5 2 • • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 5 .5 Review new development for compliance with housin g ariety and tenure policies (HE 5 .5) 0 C D 6 .8 Maintain growth management exemption for affordabl e housing and housing in Downtown core (HE 6 .8) 0 C D 6 .9 Amend Zoning & Parking Access Plan to allow flexibl e egs for housing in Downtown Core (HE 6 .9) C C D 6 .10 Provide incentives to encourage housing in Downtow n ore (HE 6 .10)M C D 6 .11 Include R-3 and R-4 zoned land in OASP to accommodate -xtremely low to low income housing (HE 6 .11) C - C D 6 .13 Consider GP amendments to rezone non-residential lan d o higher density, infill or mixed use - 13 sites listed (H E ..12)M C D 6 .13 Continue to support SLO Housing Trust Fund HE 6 .13)0 _C D 6 .14 Encourage residential infill and densification over ne w annexation of land (HE 6 .14) 0 C D 6 .15 Seek opportunities with other public agencies to develo p surplus land for housing (HE 6 .15) 0 C D 6 .16 Develop multi-family housing standards to promot e 'nnovative higher density housing (HE 6 .16)M C D 6 .17 Complete the OASP and obtain City authorization to fil e annexation app (HE 6 .17) C C D 6 .18 Financially assist lower income housing using State, Fed & ocal sources (HE 6 .18) 0 - C D 6 .19 Actively seek new revenue sources for affordable housin g (HE 6 .19) 0 C D 6 .20 Update Community design guidelines & amend MC2 .48 t o exempt smaller residential developments (HE 6 .20) C C D 6 .21 Identify vacant or under-used City land for housing (H E 3 .21) 0 - C D 6 .22 Prepare property profiles for properties suitable fo r lousing (HE 6 .22)L C D 6 .23 Evaluate adding a Special Considerations overlay to 4 6 acre County-owned property behind General Hospital (H E 3 .23)M C D 6 .24 Update Affordable Housing incentives to be consisten t with state law (HE 6 .24)M C D 6 .25 Evaluate increasing residential densities allowed in CN,0 and CD zones (HE 6 .25)M C D 6 .26 Evaluate underlying lot patterns in R-2, R-3 and R-4 zone s for ability to meet density (HE 6 .26)H C D 6 .27 Support residential infill and promote higher density (H E 3 .27) 0 C D 6 .28 Consider changes to SDU ordinance to provide incentive s to encourage production HE 6 .28)M C D 6 .29 Evaluate subdivision and zoning regs changes to support small lot subdivisions & other alternatives (HE 6 .29)M C D 7 .8 Implement strategies to ensure residents are aware of planning decisions affecting neighborhoods (HE 7 .8) 0 C D 7 .9 Identify specific neighborhood needs (HE 7 .9)M C D 7 .10 Help fund neighborhood improvements (HE 7 .10)M CD -11 -BW 1-5 3 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 7 .11 Continue to implement neighborhood parking strategie s (HE 7 .11) 0 C D 8 .11 Support regional solutions to meet the needs of th e homeless (HE 8 .11) 0 C D 8 .12 Continue mobile home park rent stabilization program (H E 8 .12) 0 AD M 8 .13 Identify sites suitable for mobile home parks, self-hel p housing and others to meet special needs (HE 8 .13)M C D 8 .14 Advocate more housing and refurbishing campus housin g at Cal Poly (HE 8 .14) C C D 8 .15 Work with Cal Poly to secure on-campus fraternity/sororit y groups (HE 8 .15)M - C D 8 .16 Jointly implement a good neighbor program with college s for student housing in residential neighborhoods (HE 8 .16) 0 AD M 8 .17 Provide education regarding universal design (HE 8 .17)0 C D 8 .18 Solicit input on provisions for homeless shelters fro m service agencies (HE 8 .18) 0 C D 8 .19 Update zoning ordinance to allow homeless shelters b y right in zones subject to standards (HE 8 .19)M C D 8 .20 Continue to allow transitional housing and supportiv e mousing in residential zones (HE 8 .20) 0 C D 8 .21 Identify properties that can be converted to affordable an d supportive housing for homeless persons (HE 8 .21)M C D 8 .22 Update Community Design Guidelines to include universa l access standards (HE 8 .22)M C D 8 .23 Develop a program addressing reasonabl e accommodation procedures (HE 8 .23) 0 C D 8 .24 Consider an overlay zone for existing and future mobil e home and trailer parks (HE 8 .24)M C D 9 .6 Educate staff and advisory bodies on energy conservatio n opportunities for housing (HE 9 .6) 0 C D 9 .7 Evaluate solar regulations and revise local regulations a s needed (HE 9 .7)M C D 9 .8 Adopt LID standards (HE 9 .8)L C D 9 .9 Develop an ordinance to increase production of gree n lousing units (HE 9 .9)M C D 9 .10 Promote building materials reuse and recycling (HE 9 .10)0 C D 10 .3 Work with County to mitigate housing impacts due t o expansion in areas adjacent to City (HE 10 .3) 0 C D 10 .4 Encourage residential developers to promote project s within SLO housing market first (HE 10 .4) 0 C D 10 .5 Advocate link between enrollment and expansion o f campus housing for colleges (HE 10 .5)M C D 10 .6 Advocate for state legislation to provide funding fo r olleges to develop campus housing (HE 10 .6)M C D 11 .3 Adopt measures to ensure ability of legal conforming non - esidential uses to continue where new housing i s Droposed on or adjacent to sites (HE 11 .3) C C D ;Circulation • -12 -BW1-5 4 • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 4 .1 Revise zoning regulations to provide standards for lockers , -ecured bicycle parking and showers (Cl 4 .1 .5) C C D 11 .1 Encourage Airport Land Use Commission to complet e Airport Land Use Plan update (Cl 11 .1 .2) C C D 10 .1 Amend Home Occupation regulations to preclude regula r ome delivery by commercial trucks (Cl 10 .1 .2) C C D 15 .1 Revise ARC guidelines to incorporate protection of view s rom scenic roads (Cl 15 .1 .2) C C D 2 .1 Recommend that county-wide trip reduction include a n VR of 1 .60 or larger (Cl 2 .1 .2) C - P W 3 .1 Encourage SLORTA to expand commuter bus service t o uesta & the Men's Colony (Cl 3 .1 .4) C PW 3 .1 Cooperate with SLOCOG to evaluate centralized transi t ervices (Cl 3 .1 .5) C PW 4 .1 Update the City bicycle plan (Cl 4 .1 .2)C PW 4 .1 Request Cal Poly & Cuesta to adopt bicycle plans (C l .1 .3) C - PW 4 .1 Request Cal Poly & Cuesta to revise campus master plan s o encourage alternate transportation (Cl 4 .1 .4) C PW 8 .1 Maintain a computerized circulation system model (C I :.1 .4) C PW 9 .1 Require a Project Study Report for Prado Road to ensur e . roper sequence of improvements (Cl 9 .1 .3) C PW 9 .1 Evaluate street designs as method to achievin g onceptual Plan for City's Center (Cl 9 .1 .5) C PW 9 .1 Evaluate feasibility of arterial between Santa Barbara St & he S . end of Santa Rosa (Cl 9 .1 .5) C PW 9 .1 Ask SLOCOG to monitor pattern of developmen t hroughout County (Cl 9 .1 .7 .A) C - PW 9 .1 Ask SLOCOG to study regional traffic needs between SL O =nd the coast (Cl 9 .1 .7 .B) C PW 12 .1 Encourage SLOCOG to evaluate local rail service (C l 12 .1 .2) C PW 13 .1 Periodically update the Parking Management Plan (C l 13 .1 .1) C PW 13 .1 Build additional parking structures only after a omprehensive parking study is done (Cl 13 .1 .4) C PW 13 .1 Work with the Downtown Association to evaluate cur b .arking in the downtown (Cl 13 .1 .5) C PW 16 .1 Incorporate a Transportation Work Program into the Cit y financial plan (Cl 16 .1 .1) C PW 16 .1 Adopt a transportation impact fee ordinance (Cl 16 .1 .2)C PW 3 .1 Adopt 5 yr . Transit Master Plans (Cl 3 .1 .1)C PW 2 .1 Cooperate with APCD & others to establish trip reductio n programs (Cl 2 .1 .1) 0 PW 3 .1 Pursue goal of City employees reaching an AVR of 1 .7 o r sreater (CI 2 .1 .4) 0 PW 3 .1 Maintain a downtown trolley service (Cl 3 .1 .3)0 PW 4 .1 Obtain RR ROW & easements for separated bike path & pedestrian trail (Cl 4 .1 .6)H PW 4 .1 Use street funds to maintain bicycle facilities (Cl 4 .1 .7)0 PW -13 -BW 1-5 5 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 5 .1 Pursue completion of the community sidewalk system (C l 5 .1 .2)H PW 5 .1 Continue program of replacing existing curbs wit h handicapped ramps (Cl 5 .1 .3) 0 PW 5 .1 Work with schools to establish a "suggested routes t o school" program (CI 5 .1 .4) 0 PW 6 .3 Revise subdivision regulations to include ROW and desig n standards (Cl 6 .3 .2)M PW 7 .1 Adopt neighborhood traffic management plans (Cl 7 .1 .1)0 PW 7 .1 Undertake measures to control traffic in residential area s (Cl 7 .1 .2) 0 PW 7 .1 Organize neighborhood traffic calming workshops (C l 7 .1 .3) 0 PW 7 .1 Upon request, analyze residential streets for livability (C l 7 .1 .4) 0 PW 7 .1 Non-safety City vehicles shouldn't use residential local o r :ollector streets as shortcuts (Cl 7 .1 .5) 0 P W 8 .1 Establish on-going transportation monitoring program (C l 8 .1 .2) 0 P W 8 .1 Conduct bi-annual transportation use survey (Cl 8 .1 .3)0 P W 9 .1 Establish building setback lines along Figure 4 routes (C l 9 .1 .1) 0 PW 9 .1 As part of Dalidio-Madonna-McBride development , evaluation new road between W . Prado Rd and LOVR (C l 9 .1 .8) 0 PW 9 .1 As part of Maino-Madonna development, evaluat e frontage road on west side of Highway 101 (Cl 9 .1 .9) _ 0 PW 10 .1 Continue to provide reserved commercial truck loading i n downtown areas (Cl 10 .1 .4) 0 PW 12 .1 Encourage daily morning & evening train service bot h north & south (Cl 12 .1 .1) 0 PW 13 .1 Monitor public parking in the commercial core (Cl 13 .1 .2)0 PW 13 .1 Work with CalTrans to consider park-and-ride lots (C l 13 .1 .3) 0 PW 15 .1 Work with CalTrans to improve appearance of Highwa y 101 (Cl 15 .1 .1)H PW 16 .1 Reevaluate all Circulation Element projects befor e mplementation (Cl 16 .1 .3) 0 PW 16 .1 Major project proposals will include effects on the nearb y neighborhoods and entire city (Cl 16 .1 .4) 0 P W 3 .1 Develop a bulk discount rate for monthly transit passes (C l 3 .1 .2) 0 - P W 2 .1 Support aggressive APCD programs for Cal Poly, Cuest a and the Men's Colony (Cl 2 .1 .3) 0 PW 4 .1 Encourage Cal Poly & Cuesta to provide incentives to us e alternate transportation (Cl 4 .1 .1) 0 PW 8 .1 Cooperate with State & SLOCOG in evaluating HOV lane s on State highways (Cl 8 .1 .5)L PW 10 .1 Work with APCD to encourage trucks to turn off idlin g motors when parked (Cl 10 .1 .1)L PW 15 .1 Adopt a street corridor landscape plan for scenic roadway s (Cl 15 .1 .3) 0 CD • • • -14 -BW 1-5 6 • • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 9 .1 Ask CalTrans to designate Prado Road from Broad t o Highway 101 as Highway 227 (Cl 9 .1 .2)-H PW 3 .1 Adopt 20 yr. Transit Master Plans (Cl 3 .1 .1)M P W 3 .1 Develop a comprehensive marketing to reach targe t audiences (Cl 3 .1 .6 ; Cl 8 .11)M PW 8 .0 Give priority to traffic programs identified in Cl 8 .0 .1A with the greatest potential to reduce traffic increases permitte d oy the City's Growth Management Plan(CI 8 .1 .1)M PW 5 .1 Adopt a pedestrian transportation plan (Cl 5 .1 .1)M PW 6 .3 Develop joint design & construction standards with Count y for streets within the URL (Cl 6 .3 .1)H PW 10 .1 If LOS exceeded, limit truck delivery times in th e commercial core (Cl 10 .1 .5)M P W 9 .1 Adopt a plan & standards for installation and maintenanc e of street amenity improvements (Cl 9 .1 .4) 0 PW 11 .1 Work with the ALUC to encourage quieter & environmentally sensitive aircraft (Cl 11 .1 .1)H PW 2 .1 Work with area employers on a voluntary trip reductio n program (CI 2 .1 .5)H PW 3 .6 Conservation and Open Spac e Promote public awareness of cultural resources throug h activities, including tours & clean-up events (COS E 3 .6 .1 .A.3) C AD M 3 .6 Assist the CHC in preparing archaeological resourc e guidelines (COSE 3 .6 .5) C AD M 3 .6 Display artifacts which illuminate past cultures (COS E 3 .6 .6) C AD M 3 .6 Expand ARC guidelines to address specific guidance fo r new buildings in historic districts (COSE 3 .6 .3) C C D 7 .7 Adopt creek setback requirements (COSE 7 .7 .9)C C D 7 .7 Protect natural communities (COSE 7 .7 .1)0 AD M 7 .7 Preserve ecotones through changes to or conditions o n new development (COSE 7 .7 .7) 0 AD M 7 .7 Protect wildlife corridors through changes to or condition s on new development (COSE 7 .7 .8) 0 AD M 8 .7 Acquire land or interests in land for open space ; see k variety of funding sources (COSE 8 .7 .1 .D)O AD M 8 .7 Manage open space holdings and enforce open space easements (COSE 8 .7 .1 .E)O AD M 8 .7 Avoid imposing taxes or fees that discourage open spac e or agriculture (COSE 8 .7 .1 .K) 0 AD M 8 .7 Maintain the position of Natural Resources Manager an d consolidate open space functions (COSE 8 .7 .1 .M)O ADM 8 .7 Provide and maintain wildlife corridors thru or unde r barriers to wildlife movement (COSE 8 .7 .2 .E)O AD M 8 .7 Provide continuing community education on open space values, programs, rules (COSE 8 .7 .2 .G)0 AD M 8 .7 Enlist volunteers and academic programs to restore an d monitor open space (COSE 8 .7 .2 .H)O AD M 8 .7 Adopt conservation plans for open space under Cit y easement or fee ownership (COSE 8 .7 .2 .J)O ADM -15 -BW 1-5 7 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 9 .3 Preserve the Morros, in cooperation with othe r !overnment agencies, non-profit land trusts and propert y owners (COSE 9 .3 .12) 0 AD M 8 .7 Provide information on natural resources and lan d onservation (COSE 8 .7 .1 .1)O AD M 10 .3 Participate with other agencies in watershed planning an d management (COSE 10 .3 .2 .E) 0 AD M 3 .6 Provide cultural resource awareness public educationa l rograms (COSE 3 .6 .6)O AD M 3 .6 Encourage partnering for preservation (COSE 3 .6 .7)0 AD M 3 .5 Acquire in fee or partial interest in archaeological site s ,LOSE 3 .5 .1) 0 AD M 4 .6 Promote technology and energy conservation businesse s COSE 4 .6 .16) 0 AD M 5 .5 Maintain inventory of recycling businesses and service s COSE 5 .5 .5) 0 AD M 8 .7 Improve interagency cooperation for open space cquisition (COSE 8 .7 .1 .J) 0 AD M 8 .7 Encourage sustainable agricultural practices, limit gradin g cnd livestock near creeks (COSE 8 .7 .1 .H)O AD M 8 .7 Enhance and restore open space (COSE 8 .7 .2)O AD M 8 .7 Establish self-sustaining populations of native specie s LOSE 8 .7 .2 .B)0 AD M 8 .7 Remove invasive non-native species and prevent thei r introduction (COSE 8 .7 .2 .C)0 AD M 8 .7 Where possible, remove man-made elements from ope n -pace areas (COSE 8 .7 .2 .D)0 AD M 7 .7 Replace invasive non-native vegetation with nativ e egetation (COSE 7 .7 .6)0 AD M 3 .6 Rehabilitate and maintain City-owned adobes and histori c tructures (COSE 3 .6 .9)O AD M 8 .7 Protect open space resources (COSE 8 .7 .1)O -AD M 8 .7 Identify alternative funding tools for replanting degrade d reek sections (COSE 8 .7 .2 .K)0 AD M 8 .7 Acquire ownership/easements along creeks & wetlands fo r rainage maintenance . & appropriate public access (COS E .7 .2 D, E, and F) 0 AD M 8 .7 Pursue means to protect open space (COSE 8 .7 .1)0 AD M 8 .7 Pursue source of open space funding (COSE 8 .7 .1 .D .2)0 AD M 8 .7 Replace non-native creekside plants with native specie s COSE 8 .7 .2 .B .2) 0 AD M 2 .2 Model air pollution behavior, help educate public (COS E 0 .2 .5) 0 C D 2 .3 Monitor air quality and Clean Air Plan implementatio n COSE 2 .3 .2)0 C D 2 .3 Consult with APCD on significant development proposal s COSE 2 .3 .2, 4 .6 .18) 0 C D 2 .3 Promote alternative transportation/land use strategie s COSE 2 .3 .3)0 C D 2 .3 ,t Amend the General Plan as needed to achieve air qualit y oals (COSE 2 .3 .5) 0 C D 3 .6 Maintain and support the Cultural Heritage Committee 0 CD • • -16 -BW1-5 8 • • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S (COSE 3 .6 .1 ) 3 .6 Maintain financial assistance program to encourag e preservation & restoration of historic properties (COS E 3 .6 .2) 0 C D 3 .6 Implement historic preservation standards for constructio n within historic districts (COSE 3 .6 .3)0 C D 3 .6 Provide financial assistance and incentives for histori c p reservation (COSE 3 .6 .2)0 C D 3 .6 Sponsor educational programs to foster appreciation o f historic resources (COSE 3 .6 .6) 0 _ C D 3 .6 Promote adaptive reuse of historic buildings (COSE 3 .6 .8)O C D 3 .6 Implement Cultural Heritage Committee Whitepape r (COSE 3 .6 .10) C C D 4 .6 Reduce obstacles to energy conservation (COSE 4 .6 .4)0 C D 4 .6 Administer State Building Energy Standards (COSE 4 .6 .7)O C D 4 .6 Encourage energy-efficient design in private developmen t projects (COSE 4 .6 .8)O C D 4 .6 Address solar access in new development (COSE 4 .6 .9)0 C D 4 .6 Require solar power for new dwellings (COSE 4 .6 .17)0 C D 4 .6 Seek Air Pollution Control District support for maintainin g air quality (COSE 4 .6 .18)O C D 5 .5 Ensure new development projects include space fo r materials recycling/storage (COSE 5 .5 .8)O C D 7 .7 Maintain creek setbacks (COSE 7 .7 .9)0 C D 8 .7 Maintain Urban Reserve location (COSE 8 .7 .1 .A)0 C D 8 .7 Promote open space by applying C/OS and Agricultur e zoning (COSE 8 .7 .1 .B)O C D 8 .30 Set subdivision and new development condition s consistent with General Plan (COSE 8 .30 .1 .C)O C D 8 .7 Set conditions of subdivisions and development approval s consistent w/ General Plan (COSE 8 .7 .1 .C)O C D 8 .7 Encourage transfer of development credit from ope n space lands (COSE 8 .7 .1 .F) O C D 9 .3 Maintain and apply Sign Regulations consistent with th e General Plan (COSE 9 .3 .3)O C D 9 .3 Conduct environmental and architectural review consisten t ith General Plan (COSE 9 .3 .4)O C D 9 .3 Require visual assessments for projects affectin g mportant scenic resources and views from public place s (COSE 9 .3 .5) 0 C D 9 .3 Determine that view blockage along a scenic roadway is a significant impact (COSE 9 .3 .6) 0 C D 9 .3 Review development in unincorporated County fo r consistency with General Plan (COSE 9 .3 .7) 0 C D 9 .3 Prohibit billboards (COSE 9 .3 .10)C C D 9 .3 Establish and maintain a program of describing an d monitoring viewsheds within and adjacent to City limits t o establish a photographic baseline of visual setting (COS E 3 .3 .13) 0 CD -17 -BW1-5 9 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 10 .3 Identify and protect groundwater recharge areas to maintain suitable groundwater levels and to protect groundwater quality and potential City water source s (COSE 10 .3 .2 .1) 0 C D 4 .6 Encourage sustainable employee commuting practice s (COSE 4 .6 .5)0 H R 8 .7 Remove trash and contaminants with minimum disruptio n to open space areas (COSE 8 .7 .2 .F)0 P&R 2.3 Provide alternative transportation incentives (COSE 2 .3 .4)O PW 4 .6 Promote Sustainable design in City facilities (COSE 4 .6 .3)O PW 5 .5 Use materials with reduced environmental impacts in Cit y operations and facilities (COSE 5 .5 .4)0 PW 7 .7 Implement natural communities policies through the Tre e Committee (COSE 7 .7 .9)0 PW 8 .7 Locate, design and operate City facilities consistent wit h General Plan (COSE 8 .7 .1 .G)0 PW 9 .3 Locate and design public facilities and utilities consisten t with General Plan (COSE 9 .3 .1)0 P W 9 .3 Place underground existing overhead utilities, with highes t priority for scenic roadways, entries to the City, and histori c districts (COSE 9 .3 .9) 0 P W 2 .3 Employ best available practices in City operations (COS E 2 .3 .1)0 U T 4 .6 Promote efficient City energy use (COSE 4 .6 .1)0 U T 4 .6 Promote energy conservation education (COSE 4 .6 .6)0 U T 4 .6 Retrofit City facilities for energy savings (COSE 4 .6 .10)0 U T 5 .5 Use materials efficiently in City operations (computer technology and copying) (COSE 5 .5 .1)0 U T 5 .5 Promote City materials reuse and recycling (COSE 5 .5 .2)0 UT 5 .5 Coordinate waste reduction and recycling efforts (COS E 5 .5 .3) 0 UT 8 .7 Establish positive relationships with landowners an d conservation organizations (COSE 8 .7 .1 .L)0 UT 10 .3 Use water efficiently (COSE 10 .3 .1)0 U T 10 .3 Promote use of water-conserving landscape design an d plant materials (COSE 10 .3 .1 .A)0 U T 10 .3 Encourage landscape maintenance and irrigation desig n to conserve water . (COSE 10 .3 .1)0 U T 10 .3 Facilitate use of tertiary-treated water and see k egalization of grey water for non-potable household use s (COSE 10 .3 .1) C U T 10 .3 Promote water conservation through leak control in al l plumbing systems (COSE 10 .3 .1) 0 U T 10 .3 Maintain water quality (COSE 10 .3 .2)0 U T 10 .3 Design and operate water supply, treatment an d distribution systems to prevent adverse effects on wate r quality (COSE 10 .3 .2 .A)0 U T 10 .3 Design and operate wastewater collection and treatmen t systems to prevent adverse effects on water quality (COS E 10 .3 .2 .B) 0 U T 10 .3 Regulate design, construction and operation of City facilities to protect water quality (COSE 10 .3 .2 .C)0 UT • • -18 -BW 1-6 0 • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 10 .3 Regulate design of private water facilities to protect wate r .uality (COSE 10 .3 .2 .D) 0 U T 4 .6 Seek financial assistance for energy efficienc y 'mprovements in City facilities (COSE 4 .6 .11)O UT 4 .6 Manage City operations for energy self-reliance (COS E 4 .6 .2)0 UT 5 .5 Expand City public information efforts on energy an d aterials conservation goals (COSE 5 .5 .6)O UT 10 .3 Coordinate erosion control in watershed w/ County & roperty owners (COSE 10 .3 .2 .) 0 PW 3 .5 Establish and maintain records of archaeological site s COSE 3 .5 .9)M AD M 8 .7 Establish performance standards for ope n -pace/agricultural buffers (COSE 8 .7 .1 .N)M AD M 3 .6 Prepare post-disaster historic preservation standard s COSE 3 .6 .4)M C D 3 .6 Update archaeological resource preservation standard s COSE 3 .6 .5) C C D 9 .3 Update community design guidelines to address view s rom scenic routes (COSE 9 .3 .2)M C D 9 .3 Advocate State and County scenic highway designation s =nd protective programs for scenic routes connecting Sa n Luis Obispo with other communities (COSE 9 .3 .8)M C D 4 .6 Monitor energy use in City facilities and prepare biannua l report for City Council (COSE 4 .6 .12) 0 U T 8 .7 Inventory natural areas that have been degraded ; prioritize ist of restoration sites (COSE 8 .7 .2 .A)H AD M 4 .6 Prepare energy conservation plan for City facilities (COS E 4 .6 .13)M C D 4 .6 Adopt green building standards (COSE 4 .6 .14)H C D 10 .3 Prevent storage of biological or chemical pollution fro m ocating in flood zones (COSE 10 .3 .2 .F)H C D 9 .3 Remove existing billboards through amortization , onditions of development approval and grants fo r -nhancing open space and transportation corridors (COS E &3.11)H C D 9 .3 City & County enforce an amortization program fo r .illboard removal along scenic roadways (COSE 9 .3 .11)H PW 10 .3 Establish standards for non-point source water pollution i n ooperation with RWQCB (COSE 10 .3 .2 .G) 0 PW 10 .3 Establish a program for baseline water quality testing i n ity creeks (COSE 10 .3 .2 .H) 0 U T 4 .6 Consider City-owned green energy utility (COSE 4 .6 .15)H U T Nois e 1 .12 Review public and private development proposals fo r Noise Element conformance (N 1 .12) 0 C D 1 .13 Require noise studies early in the review process whe n project noise may exceed allowable limits (N1 .13) 0 C D 1 .14 Assure that noise mitigation measures are carried-ou t during construction (N1 .14) 0 CD -19 -BW1-6 1 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 1 .15 Monitor compliance with mitigation measures after project O C D completion (N1 .15 ) Safety 9 .19 Establish complaint-based code compliance for al l uildings (S 9 .19 .C) C C D 9 .19 Implement City-adopted program on Unreinforce d asonry buildings (S 9 .19 .D) C C D 9 .3 Set response-time objective for Public Works (S 9 .3 .C)C PW 9 .3 Evaluate fire-flow and identify deficiencies (S 9 .3)C U T 9 .4 Train building & planning staff in lessons from previou s •isaster areas (S 9 .4 .B) 0 C D 9 .19 Establish routine code inspections for commercial , industrial, public-assembly, & group housing (S 9 .19 .B) 0 C D 9 .19 Provide outreach program for earthquake bracing of wood - rame buildings (S 9 .19 .E) 0 C D 9 .20 Administer zoning, subdivision, & Architectural standard s onsistent with police & fire recommendations (S 9 .20) 0 C D 9 .21 Fire, police, public works, & utilities review developmen t pplications for safety objectives (S 9 .21) 0 C D 9 .22 Maintain & administer building regulations in conformanc e ith State requirements (S 9 .22) 0 C D 8 .2 Review emergency response plans of utilities an d ransportation agencies (S 8 .2 .5 .B) 0 F D 9 .7 Establish emergency operation center in Fire Station 1 an d •ackups sites (S 9 .7) C F D 9 .9 Keep Multi-hazard Emergency Response Plans current (S 4 .9) 0 F D 9 .2 Maintain and annually update emergency response pla n S 9 .2) 0 F D 9 .3 Meet response-time objective of four minutes (S 9 .3 .A)0 F D 9 .6 Work w/CalTrans on hazardous materials approved route s Ind related safety precautions (S 9 .6 .C) 0 F D 9 .8 Expand and keep current safety-related information (S 9 .8)0 F D 9 .10 Work with other jurisdictions on mutual-aid & automatic-ai d agreements (S 9 .10) 0 F D 9 .15 Support education programs for lower grades to teach fire azards (S 9 .15 .D) 0 F D 9 .22 Maintain & administer fire regulations in conformance wit h tate requirements (S 9 .22) 0 F D 9 .4 Train fire fighters, police, building inspectors, public works , : utilities staff (S 9 .4 .A) 0 F D 9 .4 Conduct non-nuclear disaster-response exercises (S •.4 .C) 0 F D 9 .5 Obtain information about specific location & type of fire & oxic hazards (S 9 .5) 0 F D 9 .6 Participate in periodic regional disaster-response drills (S 4 .6 .A) 0 F D 9 .11 Prepare for post-disaster recovery (S 9 .11)0 F D 9 .15 Develop program to familiarize residents with fire hazard s =nd appropriate responses (S 9 .15 .A) 0 F D 9 .15 Promote efforts of the Fire Safe Council (S 9 .15 .B)0 FD • • • -20 -BW1-62 • • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 9 .15 Continue CERT training program (S 9 .15 .C)0 F D 9 .16 Help organizations that provide emergency outreach & education (S 9 .16) 0 F D 9 .17 Encourage & participate in individual home inspectio n orograms (S 9 .17) 0 F D 9 .23 Conduct fire & hazardous materials inspections i n commercial, industrial, & multifamily buildings (S 9 .23) 0 F D 8 .1 Identify and maintain or remove hazardous trees for Cit y property and assist property owners (S 8 .1) 0 PW 9 .3 Set response-time objective for Utilities (S 9 .3 .C)C U T 9 .19 Identify & evaluate facility hazards for City owned propert y (S 9 .19 .A)M PW Parks and Re c 6 .0 Add fields in Damon-Garcia Sports Complex (PR 6 .0 .6)C P&R 3 .16 Update & improve indoor facilities (PR 3 .16 .3)C P&R 3 .18 Construct a therapy pool at the SLO Swim Center (P R 3 .18 .1 .2) C P&R 3 .19 Pursue joint use of SLO High School swimming pool (P R 3 .19 .2) C P&R 4 .3 Accommodate schedules of working people (PR 4 .3 .3 .2)C P&R 5 .1 Develop collaborative fee exchange with S .L .C .U .S .D . (P R 5 .1 .1) C P&R 6 .1 Upgrade Recreation Center to provide interim communit y center (PR 6 .1 .1) C P&R 6 .0 Develop joint use agreements with other agencies i n addition to schools (PR 6 .0 .3) C P&R 6 .2 Construct mini-parks at Purple Sage Drive (PR 6 .2 .1)C P&R 6 .2 Construct mini-park at Marsh & Santa Rosa (PR 6 .2 .1)C P&R 3 .14 Partner with schools and other joint users to renovat e existing sports fields (PR 3 .14 .1) 0 P&R 3 .19 Continue the Playground Equipment Replacemen t Proqram (PR 3 .19 .1) 0 P&R 4 .2 Regularly evaluate demand and need and modify a s appropriate (PR 4 .2 .2 .1) 0 P&R 4 .2 Conduct periodic public evaluations of services (P R 4 .2 .2 .2) 0 P&R 4 .2 Regularly publicize recreational opportunities (PR 4 .2 .2 .3)0 P&R 4 .2 Consider needs of underserved groups (PR 4 .2 .2 .4)0 P&R 4 .2 Avoid duplication of commercial programs (PR 4 .2 .3)0 P&R 4 .2 Collaborate with groups providing high risk programs i n open space areas (PR 4 .2 .8) 0 P&R 4 .3 Recruit at-risk youth to participate in activities (PR 4 .3 .2 .1)0 P&R 4 .3 Collaborate with other agencies in serving at-risk yout h (PR 4 .3 .2 .2) 0 P&R 4 .3 Evaluate services to determine benefits (PR 4 .3 .3 .1)0 P&R 4 .3 Prioritize new activities from results of public input (P R 4 .3 .3 .3) 0 P&R 4 .3 Continue to maintain publicly accessible open space trail s (PR 4 .3 .6) 0 P&R 6 .0 Continue to improve existing fields (PR 6 .0 .1)0 P&R 6 .0 Transition from multi-use to single use fields (PR 6 .0 .2)0 P&R 6 .0 Develop new programs to not conflict with existing field 0 P&R -21 -BW 1-6 3 Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS use (PR 6 .0 .4 ) 6 .0 Ensure athletic fields are provided within new residentia l development (PR 6 .0 .5) 0 P&R 6 .0 Consider additional fields for needs not addressed wit h Damon Garcia fields (PR 6 .0 .6) 0 P&R 6 .1 Consider revenue enhancement to fund new communit y center (PR 6 .1 .3) 0 P&R 6 .2 Support neighbor efforts to develop mini-parks (PR 6 .2 .2)0 P&R 6 .3 Design new parks so they can connect to recreationa l trails (PR 6 .3 .3) 0 P&R 6 .3 Connect existing parks & open space with trails (PR 6 .3 .4)0 P&R 6 .4 Schedule "unmet needs" projects through the CIP proces s (PR 6 .4 .1) 0 P&R 6 .4 Look for alternatives to address unmet needs projects (P R 3 .4 .2) 0 P&R 6 .3 Acquire open space property to construct trails (PR 6 .3 .1)0 P&R 6 .3 Use a variety of techniques to acquire open space (P R 3 .3 .2) 0 P&R 3 .16 Acquire property and construct a community center (P R 3 .16 .2)H P&R 3 .17 Implement the revised Laguna Lake Park Master Plan (P R 3 .17 .1 & PR 6 .5 .1)H _ P&R 3 .18 Implement the revised Sinsheimer Park Master Plan (P R 3 .18 .1 .1 & PR 6 .5 .1) P&R Water and Wastewate r A2 .3 Work cooperatively on regional water issues & resourc e planning (WW A2 .3 .1) 0 U T A2 .3 Participate with SLO County in Integrated Regional Wate r Mgmt Plan (WW A2 .3 .2) 0 U T A2 .3 Participate with other appropriate agencies in controllin g invasive species which could impact water supplies (WW A2 .3 .3) 0 U T A2 .3 Work with agencies to minimize water quality impact s (WW A2 .3 .4) 0 UT A2 .3 Continue to work with SLO County-operation of Salina s Reservoir & Nacimiento project (WW A2 .3 .5) 0 U T A2 .3 Complete sanitary surveys for Salinas & Whale Roc k reservoirs every five years (WW A2 .3 .6)L U T A3 .3 Provide water resource update to Council as part of annual report (WW A3 .3 .1) 0 U T A3 .3 Update safe annual yield computer model for Salinas & Whale Rock reservoirs following drought periods (WW A3 .3 .2) C U T A3 .3 Monitor ongoing research for potential long term impacts to water supplies from climate change (WW A3 .3 .3) 0 U T A4 .3 Work with other agencies to implement Best Managemen t Practices to reduce siltation (WW A4 .3 .1) 0 U T A4 .3 Continue education & outreach to owners in watersheds t o reduce siltation (WW A4 .3 .2) 0 U T A4 .3 Consider periodic siltation studies at each reservoir (W W A4 .3 .3)M U T A4 .3 Provide annual update on siltation to Council (WW A4 .3 .4)0 UT • • • -22 -BW1-64 • • Attachment 2 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S A5 .3 Provide annual update on water supply & deman d rojections to Council (WW A .5 .3 .1) 0 U T A5 .3 Conduct periodic updates to water development impac t ees (WW A5 .3 .2) 0 U T A5 .3 Prepare Urban Water Management Plan every five year s WW A5 .3 .3) 0 U T A5 .3 Prepare water supply assessments for large ne w evelopments (WW A5 .3 .4) 0 U T A5 .3 Analyze water efficiency program impacts to overal l eduction in water demand (WW A5 .3 .5) 0 U T A6 .3 Work with SLO County water agencies to identify ooperative water efficiency measures (WW A6 .3 .1) 0 U T A6 .3 Participate in state & regional water conservation effort s A6 .3 .2) 0 U T A6 .3 Implement Water Shortage Contingency Plan as require d WW A6 .3 .3) 0 U T A7 .3 Expand recycled water distribution system (WW A 7 .3 .1)0 U T A7 .3 Review development projects to ensure recycled water is used appropriately (WW A7 .3 .2) 0 U T A7 .3 Present annual recycled water use as part of annual repor t o Council (WW A7 .3 .3) 0 U T A7 .3 Consider delivery of recycled water to customers outsid e ity limits (WW A7 .3 .4)M U T B2 .3 Expand capacity in collection system and Wate r Reclamation Facility (WW 82 .3 .1)H U T B2 .3 Evaluate wastewater flows of proposed projects (W W B2 .3 .2) 0 U T B2 .3 Conduct periodic updates to wastewater developmen t mpact fees (WW B2 .3 .3)H U T B3 .3 Prepare & implement Water Reclamation Facilty maste r 1.lan (WW 83 .3 .1) 0 U T B3 .3 Work cooperatively on regional water quality issues (W W B3 .3 .2) 0 U T B4 .3 Investigate cost-effective methods for reducing infiltratio n cnd inflow to the wastewater collection system (W W B4 .3 .1)H U T B4 .3 Provide education and outreach regarding infiltration an d inflow (WW B4 .3 .2) 0 U T B4 .3 Support retrofit of sewer laterals to reduce infiltration an d nflow (WW 84 .3 .3) 0 U T B4 .3 Update Sewer System Management Plan to maintain it s =pplicability (WW B4 .3 .4) 0 U T B4 .3 Maintain master plans for wastewater service t o .eveloping areas of City (WW B4 .3 .5) 0 U T B4 .3 Review development proposals to ensure necessar y 'nfrastructure is in place (WW B4 .3 .6) 0 U T B4 .3 Provide a Pretreatment Program pursuant to Clean Wate r ct (WW B4 .3 .7) 0 UT -23 -BW 1-6 5 Attachment 2 ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S STATUS OF ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATIO N PROGRAMS ,~.sT40s AS FO ,,,ww:s p ' No. Lead Dept Implementation Program Summary comp ' Ongoing Difficulty to Complete Low Med Hig h 1 CDD 2 .2 .2a Development subject to 20 ft setbac k from creek . 0 2 CDD 2 .2 .2b Development subject to 30 ft . setback from wetland habitat 0 3 CDD 2 .2 .2c Development subject to 20 ft . setbac k from riparian/wetland mitigation areas & fenced . 0 4 ADM 2 .2 .3a Create 1 .94 acres of wetland & 2 .7 6 acres of riparian enhancement . 0 5 ADM 2 .2 .3b Allow filling of .78 acres of isolate d agricultural wetland seeps on hill . 0 6 ADM 2 .2 .4a Allow .12 acres of creek fill for 3 bridg e crossings . 0 7 CDD 2 .2 .4b All creek channel modifications to compl y with Drainage Design Manual & any othe r required permits from Army Corps or Fish an d Game . 0 8 ADM 2 .2 .5a Plant native species between trails/re c features and wetland/riparian habitat 0 9 ADM 2 .2 .5b Provide educational signage re : wetlan d & creek habitats on public trails and OS . 0 10 ADM 2 .2 .9a City will manage Righetti Hill open spac e in accordance with City Standards . 0 11 ADM 2 .2 .9b City will provide & maintain access t o Righetti Hill .City will development a management plan consistent with COSE . 0 12 CDD 2 .2 .10a Landowner maintains right to existin g #structures & will manage parcel consistent wit h Open Space standards . 0 13 CDD 2 .3 .3a 16 .3 acres of active & passive parkland t o be provided with development . City will pursue 4 acres of joint use with SLCUSD with new schoo l development nearby . 0 14 CDD 2 .3 .3b 12 acre park to be developed : 10 acres t o be dedicated w/Phase I development 0 15 PR 2 .3 .3c 2 .5 acre junction park to be develope d when impact fees are available . 0 16 CDD 2 .3.3d 1 .5 acres of linear park to be develope d w/bike path adj to stormwater basin . 0 17 CDD 2 .3 .3e 4 acres of park to be provided by a join t use facility when elementary school is 0 -24 -BW 1-66 • • • • • Attachment 2 ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S developed . 18 CDD 2 .3 .4a Subdivisions may provide parkland in lie u of fee payment if findings can be made . 0 19 CDD 2 .4 .1a 20 ft landscaped setback from Orcutt an d Tank Farm Roads . 0 20 CDD 2 .4 .l b Parcels adjacent to Tank Farm & Orcut t are sensitive sites & require ARC review . 0 21 CDD 2 .4 .1c ARC shall review landscape plans - cluster trees and screen views of new structures . 0 22 CDD 2 .4 .1d Buildings on sensitive parcels shall not include 2nd story unless 2nd floor is set back b y 50 ft . 0 23 CDD 2 .4 .1e PC shall review design of sensitive lot s during subdivision review to ensure views ar e maintained 0 24 CDD 2 .4 .1f ARC design review of units along Tan k Farm & Orcutt for compatibility & views of hill 0 25 CDD 2 .4 .1g E street residences shall not be visibl e from Orcutt/Tank Farm intersection 0 26 CDD 2 .4 .1h R-1 subdivision at west base of Righett i Hill - preserve views from D street to hill 0 27 CDD 2 .5 .1a Implement environmental mitigatio n measures with entitlements as appropriate . 0 28 CDD 3 .2 .19a Provide public plaza/seating area s adjacent to NB streets intersection . 0 29 CDD 3 .2 .19 b Commercial uss to occupay groun d floor of primary commercial area . 0 30 CDD 3 .2 .19c Provide commercial developmen t incentives : additional story, parking reduction , exemption from OASP add-on fees . 0 31 PW 3 .2 .24a Right-to-farm ordinance notification fo r real property transfers . 0 32 CDD 3 .2 .24b Ag activities to be phased out by project build-out . Existing uses legally-established subject to Non-conforming uses under Zonin g Code . 0 33 CDD 3 .3 .4a City will support affordable housing i n area through state and local density bonu s incentives . 0 34 CDD 3 .4 .1a Geotech study required for each projec t site prior to development . 0 35 CDD 3 .4 .l b All structures & development shall mee t appropriate codes (Building & Transportation). 0 36 CDD 3 .4 .2a Sites not previously surveyed shal l conduct a Phase I site assessment . 0 -25 -BW 1-6 7 Attachment 2 ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 37 CDD 3 .4 .2b Environmental assessment reqd prior t o public access or development for buidling s associated with ag uses and 55 gallon drums i n plan area . 0 38 CDD 3 .5 .2a-h Performance standards for airpor t compatibility . 0 39 CDD 4 .1 .1a Encourage archtectural styles : Craftsman, CA Bungalow, CA Mission themes 0 40 CDD 4 .1 .l b Design Standards for R-1 and R-2 districts . 0 41 CDD 4 .1 .1c Design Guidelines for R-1 and R-2 districts . 0 42 CDD 4 .1 .1d Design Standards for R-3 and R-4 development 0 43 CDD 4 .1 .1e Design Guidelines for R-3 and R-4 development 0 44 CDD 4 .1 .2a Residential design - use local streets t o enhance neighborhood atmosphere 0 45 CDD 4 .1 .2b Design features (porches, entryways , yards) to strengthen connections . 0 46 CDD 4 .1 .2c Encourage universally accessible entrie s to residences . 0 47 PW 4 .2 .3a Traffic calming design for intersection o f A and B streets 0 48 CDD 4 .2 .3b Mixed use commercial area nea r intersection of A&B streets to have 2 publi c plazas . Adjacent buildings to be 2 stories tall . 0 49 CDD 4 .2 .3c Southern part of intersction of A&B streets to be landscaped . 0 50 CDD 4 .2 .4a Building setbacks from A Street defined 0 51 CDD 4 .2 .4b Trees in tree wells for whole mixed us e area 0 52 CDD 4 .2 .4c Mixed-use building facades, materials , entries, windows to be consistent with on e another . 0 53 CDD 4 .2 .1a Use figures 3 .1 and 3 .2 when reviewin g intersection plans for A and B streets 0 54 CDD 4 .2 .l b Height ordinance allowed to be relaxed t o enable architectural features . 0 55 CDD 4 .3 .4a Final landscape plan to include details & not use invasive non-native plant species . 0 56 CDD 4 .3 .4b List of plants not be be planted in OASP .0 57 CDD 4 .4 .3a OASP lighting standards - style, height , efficiency, sheilding, type, etc . 0 58 CDD 4 .5 .1a 160 ft wide distance buffer from trai n tracks to residential areas . 0 59 CDD 4 .5 .l b Add landscaped berm or sound wal l where buffer is not adequate for noise . 0 • • -26 -BW 1-6 8 • • • Attachment 2 ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 60 CDD 4 .5 .1c Orient residential uses and outdoor area s away from railroad tracks . 0 61 CDD 4 .5 .1d Put parking lots between residence an d railroad tracks . 0 62 CDD 4 .5 .1e Locate sensitive uses within residence s away from tracks . 0 63 CDD 4 .5 .1f Use insulating construction to reduc e noise . 0 64 CDD 4 .5 .2a Set outdoor activity areas 80' back fro m Orcutt and Tank Farm Rd to reduce noise . 0 65 CDD 4 .5 .2b Locate sensitive uses within residence s away from roads . 0 66 CDD 4 .5 .2c 60 ft wide distance buffer from Orcutt an d Tank Farm Rd to residences . 0 67 CDD 4 .5 .2d Use insulating construction to reduc e noise . 0 68 CDD 4 .7 .2 Building placement & construction t o maximize passive systems for heating, cooloin g & lighting . 0 69 CDD 4 .7 .2b Use shade, skylights, daylight controls,& glazing to maximize energy savings . 0 70 CDD 4 .7 .2c Residential developments of >5 units/non-residential uses >5,000 sq ft shal l comply with green building criteria 0 71 CDD 4 .7 .2d 5% of all single family units shall use photovoltaics . Increase this percentage by 4 % each year . 0 72 CDD 4 .7 .3a Energy star compliant appliance s required for dwellings . 0 73 CDD 4 .7 .3b Use CFLs where possible .0 74 PW 5 .1 .1 Orcutt Rd to have a continuous 2-way left - turn lane, Class II bike lane, & curb/gutte r between Johnson and Tank Farm . 0 75 PW 5 .1 .2 Tank Farm to be widened at D St , Brookpine & Wavertree w/left turn lanes . 0 76 PW 5 .1 .3 Tank Farm/Orcutt intersection realignmen t to be completed in Phase I . 0 77 PW 5 .2 .1 Collector streets will be single lane o f travel in each direction . 0 78 PW 5 .2 .2 A St . shall have Class II bike lanes & separated sidewalks & no parking (excep t adjacent to neigbhorhood commercial area) o n both sides . 0 79 PW 5 .2 .3 B St . development standards .0 80 PW 5 .2 .4 C St . development standards .0 81 PW 5 .2 .5 D St . development standards .0 82 PW 5 .2 .6 Bullock Ln to be extended to connect wit h traffic circle at B & C streets . 0 -27 -BW 1-6 9 Attachment 2 ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 83 PW 5 .2 .7 Traffic circle to be built at B and C stree t intersections . 0 84 PW 5 .2 .8 Shared driveway access for A, B, C, &D streets ok. Limited private drives ok . 0 85 PW 5 .3 .1 E St development standards 0 86 CDD 5 .3 .2 Allow alley area to count towards net sit e area for density determination . 0 87 PW 5 .4 .1 Bus routes, stops & pullout areas to b e determined by City transit . 0 88 PW 5 .5 .1 Bike trail connections descriptions 0 89 PW 5 .5 .2 Neighborhood park bike trail pat h description 0 90 PW 5 .5 .3 Tank Farm & Orcutt Road bike paths an d bike bridge over Industrial Way 0 91 PW 7 .2 .2a Circulation & road widths shal l accommodate Fire Dept emergency access . 0 92 PW 7 .2 .2b Public fire hydrants regd . Adequat e water volumes to support fire hydrants for fire protection needs . 0 93 FD 7 .2 .2c Buildings shall have fire sprinkler system s per SLOFD requirements . 0 • _28_BW1-70 • • Attachment 2 MID-HIGUERA AREA ENHANCEMENT PLA N STATUS OF MID-HIGUERA AREA ENHANCEMENT PLA N No . Lead Dept Implementation Program Summary "`,~ a Complete Ongoing r§s ASS ®"ber2Oa xr av Difficulty t o Complete Low Medium High 1 ADM Plant native veg along creek . Acquir e land on fwy side of creek & propety o n east side of creek between City prop & Marsh Street bridge for open spac e (Crk-a)H 2 ADM Improve open space at south end of Brook St . (PPO-d)M 15 PW Restripe street spaces & reduc e driveway ramps (Pkg-b)M 3 P&R Acquire CalTrans property & develo p park (PPO-a)H 4 PW Modify or replace Marsh St bridge i f desirable to align w/Higuera- Mars h (Flood-a)H 5 PW Install bypass overflow channe l parallel to creek on City-owned O S (Flood-b)H 6 PW Coordinate other flood-plannin g improvements (Flood-c .)H 7 PW Widen Higuera to four lanes w/bik e lanes & median & mid-block turns (Circ-a)H 8 PW Realign Bianchi Ln w/ High St . (Circ- b)H 9 PW Realign Pacific St . Close Walker St . Landscape Walker closed area (Circ - c)H 10 PW Parker St- CGS, trees, benches , lighting .Higuera - trees, lighting & benches .Madonna- landscaped median .Underground utilities & remove billboards (Circ-d)H 11 PW Extend Brook St . w/Caltrans sit e (Circ-e)H 12 PW Install bikeway along creek wit h bridge (Crk-b)H 13 PW Construct ped path on east side of creek . Add benches, public art & interpretive displays & bridges (Crk-c)H -29 —BW1-7 1 Attachment 2 MID-HIGUERA AREA ENHANCEMENT PLAN 14 PW Establish a Mid-Higuera Area parkin g committee & consider parkin g assessment dist (Pkg-a)H 16 PW Review shared use parking & expan d to distribute parking (Pkg-c)H 17 PW Lease or purchase 2 public parkin g lots (Pkg-d)H 18 PW Acquire & improve public parking nea r Archer/Walker/Higuera & Parker/Hig h (Pkg-e)H 19 PW Complete street improvement s including ped amenities (Pkg-f)H 20 PW Establish in-lieu parking fee for th e Mid-Higuera Area (Pkg-g)H 21 PW Add transit stops w/shelter, benche s & signage for the Mid-Higuera area . (Pub-a & Pub-b)H 22 PW Develop mini-plaza at Walker (PPO-b)H 23 PW Provide info kiosks at strategic place s for peds as part of the Mid-Higuera Enhancement Plan . (PPO-c)H 24 PW Acquire & maintain OS along creek & install bridges & imps (PPO-e)H • -30 -BW 1-72 • • • • Attachment 2 RAILROAD DISTRICT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S STATUS OF RAILROAD DISTRICT PLAN IMPLEMENTATIO N PROGRAMS ;*STATLSAS OF . ber2i41T M. fi ..,1 x .,,..eve s>ce w,=n No . Lea d Dept Implementation Program Summary Com p Ongoing Difficulty to Complet e Low Med Hig h 1 PW Install traffic signals at Upham (4 .1B)C 2 ADM Use CIPs & economic revitalization tools t o promote area (2 .9C)p 3 CD Limit noise & emissions from engine idlin g between 10pm and 6am (3 .1M)p 4 CD Ped Circulation Plan, Bike Transp . Plan , Circulation Element, and RR District Plan to b e consistent (2 .7B)0 5 CD Identify code violations & work with owners t o correct (2 .8C)p 6 PW Rehabilitate historic SP Freight warehous e (1 .11 ) - 4 construct phases & roof repair completed C 7 PW Install Curb, gutter, boardwalk & trees alon g Santa Barbara, High, Roundhouse, Emily & South Street (4 .1 D)0 H 8 CD Clearly communicate with property owners , railroad & ops staff (3 .11)p 9 CD Encourage added public telephones o r emergency call boxes (2 .7E)M 10 PW Install pedestrian crosswalks at Leff & Upha m streets (4 .1A ) -Upham Crosswalk complete, Leff stil l needed M 11 PW Widen Santa Barbara Street from Broad t o Upham - including left turn pocket (4 .1C)C 12 CD Install standard gauge railroad track to displa y of historic railroad cars (1 .12)H 13 CD Install historic markers & improved walk o f history describing RR features (1 .14)H 14 CD Public access to RR bikeway provided wit h Villa Rosa development (1 .17)H 15 CD Consider MU zone to allow broader range of uses (2 .9D)H 16 CD Consider CDBG funds for business loans an d rehabilitation grants (3 .1K)H -31 -BW 1-7 3 Attachment 2 RAILROAD DISTRICT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 17 CD Enforce property screening & maintenanc e along ROW (3 .1N)H 18 CD Rehabilitate historic water tower to 1940 s condition & update historic marker (1 .6)H 19 PW Evaluate assessment district to pay fo r undergrounding utilities (3 .10)H 20 PW Construct bikeway on land adjacent to Johnson Ave for Southbound bicyclists (1 .1)H 21 PW Install bridge off Johnson Ave for bikewa y north to Cal Poly (1 .2)H 22 PW Install pedestrian bridge over RR linkin g Fairview with Penny Lane (1 .3)H 23 PW Install bikeway & trail linking east side of R R tracks to signal on Johnson @Lizzie St (1 .4)H 24 PW Install new bikeway along both sides of R R ROW (1 .5 ) -Partial improvements completed, significant improvements still remain H 25 PW Expand passenger loading zone in parking lo t north of depot (1 .7)H 26 PW Install textured concrete paving & crosswalks , ped lighting, trees & signage @ Leff and Oso s (1 .8)H 27 PW Plant palm trees on 50-100 ft centers (1 .9)H 28 PW Acquire land & construct a multi-modal transi t center with parking, shelter, restrooms, info , bike storage, lockers etc (1 .10)H 29 PW Install street paving, curb, gutter, woo d sidewalks, street trees, lighting, & signage o n Railroad Ave, Osos, Santa Barbara, High , Emily and Roundhouse Streets (1 .13 ) -Santa Barbara Street improvement s complete; other improvements remain H 30 PW Install bikeway between Alphonso and Emil y streets (1 .15)H 31 PW Install ped/bike crossing for access fro m Stoneridge/Lawrence Dr .Nilla Ros a neighborhoods to Sinsheimer Park (1 .16)H 32 PW Improve bike/ped undercrossing to Sinsheime r Park (1 .18)H 33 PW Install bikeway linking RR bikeway wit h Augusta /Southwood Drive neighborhoo d through creek & park areas (1 .19)H 34 PW Replace/repair fencing, remove trash & instal l landscaping along fence line (1 .20)H • • -32 -BW 1-7 4 • Attachment 2 RAILROAD DISTRICT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 35 PW Encourage expanded parking & staging are a for bikes (1 .21)H 36 PW CIPs to install improvements at Emily , Roundhouse, High, Church, Santa Barbara & Osos for paving, curbs, lighting, boardwalks , signage & trees (2 .7C)H 37 PW Consider special engineering standards fo r district public improvements (2 .7D)H 38 PW Improve traffic circ-expand public transit , bikeways, & widen Santa Barbara (3 .1H ) -Santa Barbara Street improvements 90 % complete; other improvements remain 0 _ 39 PW Improve passenger loading facilities at depo t parking area (3 .1J)H 40 PW Use RR parking lease funds to improv e parking enforcement, & lot appearance (3 .1L)H 41 PW Install additional traffic signage and stree t lighting, where considered necessary a t pedestrian crossings to improve sight distanc e (4 .1E ) Traffic Signal at Upham completed .H • • -33 -BW 1-7 5 Attachment 2 AIRPORT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S STATUS OF AIRPORT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN SS',k C!FtobegD 2 : ..366 } No. Lea d Dept Implementation Program Summary Complet e or Ongoing Difficulty to Complet e Low Med Hig h 1 PW Establish joint RTA bus stop on S . Higuera & Tank Farm Rd (AASP 6 .3E)C 2 A D M Management program for area creeks require d with minimum setbacks of 35 ft . (AASP 3 .3 .1)O 3 A D M Develop remediation actions for Chevron sit e to preserve natural resources (AASP 3 .3 .4)O 4 A D M Establish mitigation bank within Chevro n property to serve AASP & MASP areas (RAS P 3 .3 .5)0 5 A D M Develop public access levels compatible wit h maintaining habitat for Chevron property (AASP 3 .3 .6)0 6 A D M Restore creek areas (AASP 3 .3 .7) 0 7 A D M Retain open space corridor to alow movemen t of wildlife on Chevron property (AASP 3 .3 .8)O 8 AD M Maintain wildlife corridors south from AAS P toward Indian Knob & Davenport Hills b y obtaining greenbelts and working with Count y (AASP 3 .3 .9P 0 9 AD M Enlarge wetland connection between areas north and south of Tank Farm Rd (RAS P 3 .3 .10)0 10 AD M City will manage acquired open space land t o preserve habitat (AASP 3 .3 .11)0 11 A D M City will pursue MOU for privately owned ope n space lands to preserve habitat (AASP 3 .3 .12)O 12 A D M In lieu fee for development not able to dedicat e land for open space (AASP 3 .3 .14)0 13 A D M Expansions of URL will secure open spac e (AASP 3 .3 .15)0 14 A D M Resource management activities compatibl e with airport operations (AASP 3 .3 .17)0 15 A D M Expand wetland north of Tank Far m w/Chevron project (AASP 3 .3 .18)0 16 CD 50 ft wetland setback required throug h subdivision, development, & public facilitie s (AASP 3 .3 .3)0 17 CD Require development to dedicate land or 0 • • -34 -BW1-7 6 • • • Attachment 2 AIRPORT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S easements for greenbelt (AASP 3 .3 .13) 18 PW Locate bike paths outside creek setback are a (AASP 6 .3H)0 19 PW Bike lanes shall meet or exceed CA DOT & City design standards (RASP 6 .31)0 20 PW Require bike lanes as pad of frontag e improvements for development . Require bu s stops as pad of development improvement s where appropriate (AASP 6 .3G)0 21 PW Establish timed transfer point on Margarita R d (AASP 6 .3D)L 22 PW Development to provide street furniture o r passenger amenities such as transit stops , shelters, pads, trash receptacles, etc . (AAS P 6 .3L)M 23 PW Amend Bicycle Transportation Plan to includ e Airport area facilities (6 .3F)M 24 AD M Limit access to creekside environmen t between Broad St . and Santa Fe Rd (AAS P 3 .3 .2)H 25 CD Access & interpretive info for historica l resources (AASP 3 .3 .16)H 26 PW TIF funds used for new buses to serve AASP . Bus stops provided by adjacent developmen t (AASP 6 .3C)H 27 PW Amend Circulation Element to expand truc k route network (AASP 6 .3A)H 28 PW Connect bike lanes at intersections in th e Airport Area (AASP 6 .3J)H 29 PW Establish a CIP program to include bikeway s not part of Airport development (AASP 6 .3K)H -35 -BW 1-7 7 Attachment 2 MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S STATUS OF MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLA N IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS STATUS 4 OF October 201 2 No . Lead Dept Implementation Program Summary comp ' Ongoing Difficulty to Complet e Low Med Hig h 1 ADM 1 .1a Hills to be dedicated to City & protected .C 2 CDD 1 .l b Livestock grazing may be limited & City will manage hillside vegetation .0 3 CDD 1 .1c Previously graded road to Teleco m facilities will be relocated .0 4 CDD 1 .2 .a Acacia Creek corridor shall be 10 0 ft wide exclusive of sports fields & will b e replanted with riparian plants .0 5 CDD 1 .2 .b Swales emerging from hills wil l have open space corridors 50 ft wide & fenced near developed areas .0 6 CDD 1 .2c Lower swales thru neighborhoo d park will be accessible for play 0 7 CDD 1 .3 Riparian and seasonal wetland s which are shown as development area s will be replaced in kind within MASP .0 8 CDD 1 .4a MASP development to detain pea k stormwater flows on-site . Shallow basin s are preferable to deeper ones .0 9 CDD 1 .5a Protect ag land elsewhere in URL o r greenbelt .0 10 CDD 1 .6a Provide 10 acre neighborhood park , and 16 acre improved sports field .0 11 CDD 1 .6 .1a Neighborhood Park req's includin g equipment and landmark feature 12 CDD 1 .6 .1 b Some seating, cooking & smal l child play space to be partly enclosed .0 13 CDD 1 .6 .2 Greenspace and play fields mainl y semi-natural vegetation, with large tree s only at edges & possiblity of communit y gardens .0 14 CDD 1 .6 .3 Greenways for cycling & walkin g paths .0 15 CDD 1 .6 .4 Sports fields to accommodat e active recreational uses & include on-sit e parking .Shielded night lighting .C • • -36 -BW1-7 8 Attachment 2 MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S • • 16 CDD 2 .1 .1 Low Density Residential areas for SFRs only . No churches, schools o r seconda dwellings .0 17 CDD 2 .1 .2 Density will be 7-9 dwellings/acre 0 18 CDD 2 .1 .3 Lot dimensions are regulated b y Table 2 0 19 CDD 2 .1 .4 A-C - setbacks and building/parkin g orientation 0 20 CDD 2 .1 .5 Each dwelling shall have 2 off - street parking spaces - one covered .& alley access standards 0 21 CDD 2 .2 .1 Medium density residential areas - detached houses on small lots or group s of detached dwellings on larger lots 0 22 CDD 2 .2 .2 Medium Density shall be 8-1 6 dwellings/acre .0 23 CDD 2 .2 .2a-e Lot dimension table & standard s for Med Density 0 24 CDD 2 .2 .4 Med Density Building form - setbacks and architecture 0 25 CDD 2 .2 .5 Parking to be located at rear . Alley access standards and special setbacks i f located in front .0 26 CDD 2 .3 .1 Med-High Density Res for attache d dwellings or PUDs . No churches o r schools allowed .0 27 CDD 2 .3 .2 Med-High Density will be 13-1 8 units/acre .0 28 CDD 2 .3 .3 Lot dimensions per Table 4 0 29 CDD 2 .3 .4a&b Setbacks and architectura l criteria 0 30 CDD 2 .3 .5 Parking to be located at rear . Alle y access standards and special setbacks i f located in front 0 31 CDD 2 .4 .1 High-Density Residential - allow a mix of densities and ownership . Churche s and Schools not allowed 0 32 CDD 2 .4 .2 High-Density Residential densit y will be 19-24 units/acre 0 33 CDD 2 .4 .3 Lots to be developed as a singl e parcel or condo however it may b e divided into two land parcels to allow fo r affordable housing .0 34 CDD 2 .4 .4a-c High Density building form - setbacks, arch character and porches o r other outdoor space .0 35 CDD 2 .4 .5 Parking requirements and location 0 -37 -BW1-7 9 Attachment 2 MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 36 CDD 2 .5 .1 Neighborhood commercial uses = CN zone except no uses larger tha n 5,000 sq ft, schools, services stations O 37 CDD 2 .5 .2 CN Density shown in Figure 5 0 38 CDD 2 .5 .3 CN lot dimensions & size minimums 0 39 CDD 2 .5 .4a-f CN Building Form (coverage , height, setbacks, FAR, size, architectura l character 0 40 CDD 2 .5 .5 CN parking rquired 1/500 sq ft .& 1/300 sq ft for bikes 0 41 CDD 2 .6 .1 Business Park uses - master- planned campus-type development .0 42 CDD 2 .6 .1a BP Office - small offices and mixe d use .0 43 CDD 2 .6 .1 b BP General - R&D, Ligh t manufacturing, business services . Alowed uses listed by approval level .0 44 CDD 2 .6 .1 c BP- Outdoor - landscaped parking , storage, employee recreation areas 0 45 CDD 2 .6 .1d BP- prohibited uses = carnivals , convalescent hospitals, dwellings , homeless shelters, schools or publi c assemby uses 0 46 CDD 2 .6 .2 BP employee density not to exceed 40 persons/acre 0 47 CDD 2 .6 .3 BP parcel sizes & dimensions 0 48 PW 2 .6 .4 BP vehicle access will be loops or grid extensions . NO driveways on Prad o Rd .0 49 CDD 2 .6 .5a-i BP site and building design (FAR , Orientation, outdoor space, setbacks , parking lots, heights, massing, entries,& materials)0 50 CDD 2 .6 .6a-d BP Continuity of landscap e space 0 51 CDD 2 .6 .7a-d BP parking requirements & design 0 52 CDD 2 .6 .8a-b BP Landscape screenin g required for loading, wast e collection,utilities & mechanica l equipment 0 53 CDD 2 .6 .10 BP Outdoor employee amenit y areas are required 0 -38 -BW 1-80 • • • • • Attachment 2 MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S CDD 2 .7 .1 Special use area between hills an d Broad street (1 .2 acres). House an d grounds should be preserved and use s may include residence ; B7B, hostel , museum, art or craft gallery with retai l sales, restaurant, retail sales of food , office for sales of MASP properties o r visitor info center .0 54 CDD 3 .1a Buildings to express human scale b y articulating mass 0 55 CDD 3 .1 b Architectural styles in plan ar e encouraged 0 56 CDD 3 .1c Residentail entries should b e identifable from streets or ped walkways 0 57 CDD 3 .1d Universally accessible entries are encouraged for all buidlings p 58 CDD 3 .1e All development is encouraged t o have outdoor space shileded from aircraft noise .0 59 CDD 3 .2 Street trees to create sense of identity ; focal areas should be highlighte d through trees and planting ; riparia n corridors should have native landscaping ; and all landscaping should be wate r efficient .0 60 CDD 3 .3 Lighting shall be energy efficient , avoid glare and minimize illuminatio n toward sky .0 61 CDD 3 .4 Buidling form & placement to meet solar exposure objectives .p 62 CDD 3 .5 Public art to be encouraged a t neigbhorhood park & principal collecto r street entries .0 63 CDD 3 .6 Dwellings & outdoor spaces to b e separated from Prado Rd by greenways , green space & BP uses . Landscape d berm to be installed where appropriate .0 64 CDD 3 .7 Fence and wall designs to compl y with community design guidelines 0 65 CDD 4 .2a-g performance standards to ensur e airport compatibility including limitation o n uses and operations that might b e dangerous ; indoor noise leve l requirements, avigation easement an d disclosure requirements 0 66 PW 5 .0 Traffic calming features to b e developed . Streets & drives to provid e access without unnecessary paving 0 -39 -BW1-8 1 Attachment 2 MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS 67 PW 5 .1 City will extend transit service int o area as roads are developed . Transi t stops to include turnouts, shelters , benches, trash receptacles & real tim e arrival status displays .0 68 PW 5 .2a New development shall includ e sidewalks, ped paths, bike lanes and bik e paths . Precise alignments will b e determined with subdivisions .0 69 PW 5 .2b Bike path width, paving, signs an d features to comply with Bicyc e Transportation Plan . Proposed crossing s may include features such as pavemen t changes, signs or bulb-outs .0 70 PW 5 .2c . Pedestrian and bike access t o sports fields will be by enhanced under o r over crossing with visibility for safety an d sense of place 0 71 PW 5 .3a-1 Streets to foster traffic volume s appropriate for land uses an d neighborhoods 0 72 PW 5 .4 Alleys should be used where feasible p 73 PW 5 .5 Local streets will have bulb-outs at the end of blocks and at mid-block fo r blocks longer than 500'.0 74 PW 5 .7 .1 Additional right-of-way for Broa d Street to accommodate bike lane, vertica l curbs, landscaped parkway, and cente r median .0 75 PW 5 .7 .2 Prado Road facilities, phasing an d construction requirements p 76 PW 5 .8 Traffic calming required - roundabouts, traffic circles, intersectio n treatments, and bulb-outs .0 77 CDD 5 .9 Street names to follow Cit y requirements .0 78 PW 6 .3 Fire-dept activated signal contro l devices required for all intersections wit h traffic signals 0 79 PW 7 .3 .1 Subdivision plans must sho w detailed solutions to stormwater issues . Develoers areresponsible for drainag e facilities serving their parcels .0 80 PW 7 .3 .2 All drainage facilities must compl y with NPDES & post construction runoff controls 0 81 PW 7 .5 Each residence shall have one 2 " conduit conneted with undergroun d system to facilitate future installation o f high-speed data system .0 • • • -40 -BW1-8 2 • Attachment 2 MARGARITA AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM S 82 PW 7 .7 All new power, telephone & cabl e lines to be installed undergound . Al l existing line facilities to be underground a t time of frontage construction .0 83 PW 7 .8 Streets& utilities installations must be built to ensure that later projets can buil d upon systems that are appropriately size d and located .0 84 CDD 8 .1a The area shall accommodate a t least 2 sites with a total capacity of 4 0 dwellings for HASLO to provide affordabl e housing .0 85 CDD 8 .l b Residential area may be develope d with modular or manufactured dwelling s that comply with specific plan .0 86 CDD 8 .1c Affordable housing density bonuse s available in area designated in Fig 5 onl y due to airport land use plan .0 • • -41 -BW 1-8 3 Long Range Division Projects 2011-1 3 Sate Shelter Pinking Program RHPI& Wak with SLOCO G Greerdicuss Gas Emissions Inventor y Nei¢ibamcod Bounds nes Piled LUCE Elements Update Housing Programs implementalkn Historic Nbwsbttera listado Context Statement deveapnen l Climate Action Plan Develtpn>ent Chevron Renedisian, developnentib annexatio n Avis Ranch preplannin g Land use Rm1 tlpdab—ooadnalw wiir Count y at Area Specific Plan Upda k AASP Acnexatton Phase 1 8 'Responses to rebirMs from Count y `Public Counter Staffing Dutie s "Maintain and updab list of Historic Resource s 'General Flan Evaluation Annual Repor t 'General Plan Ccnfamily Reports "Canmurity meetkigsand whead h 'Community Development Sloth Grant Mministrai w "CHC & Planning Canmbsicn support 'Affordable Housing Program adminishato n 'Affordable Housing Fund reoonanendaeon s "Administer Mak Act Progra m '10 Yea Plan to End Chronic Homelessness 20%40%e 80%100 % 'tars Irodc rh Ammo+arc. nu7n r,:xc avl sra sl-en .r 404$Patent Complete • • Attachment 3 ATTACHMENT 3 STATUS OF CURRENT CIP PROJECT S As of October 1,201 2 0 city of san Luis osisp o BW 1-85 Attachment 3 STATUS OF CIP PROJECT S As of October 1, 201 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS • INTRODUCTION Overview 1 Report Organization 1 Findings 2 STATUS REPORT S Major CIP Projects 3 All CIP Projects Construction or Acquisition Completed 4 Construction or Acquisition in Progress 7 Design Completed : In Bid Process 1 1 In Design 1 2 Under Study 14 • • BW1-8 6 Attachment 3 INTRODUCTIO N •OVERVIE W The purpose of this report is to provide the Council with a concise yet comprehensive summar y of the status of the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects . As discussed in greater detail below, we are making excellent progress in achieving our CI P goals : of 186 projects that have been financially active in 2012-13 : • 1 .62% (114) are either completed or unde r construction . 2 .3% (6) are in the bid process . 3 .20%(38) are under design . 4 .15%(28) are under study, in many cases with preliminary work completed and now read y for the design phase . REPORT ORGANIZATION Status of CIP Project s ■ Construction/A cquisition Completed 30% q Design Completed: I n Bid Proces s 3% Status of Major City Projects This one-page chart concisely presents the status of our progress to-date on 17 major CI P projects by presenting the "percent complete" based on the phase that it is in : construction, design or study. Status of All CIP Project s This report summarizes the status of all 186 CIP projects with financial activity in 2012-1 3 organized as follows : Project Status.Projects are first presented in one of five "phase" categories : 1.Under stud y 2.Under design 3.Design completed : in the bid proces s 4.Construction or acquisition in progres s 5.Construction or acquisition complete d Each project shows the "percent complete" within the phase along with the year that the Counci l approved funding for that phase . Primary Funding Source.Within the "phase," projects are then presented by their primar y • funding source : -1 - BW1-87 Attachment 3 INTRODUCTION •1.Capital Outlay Fund (Along with gran t funds, the General Fund is the primar y funding source for this fund .) 2.Community Development Block Gran t (CDBG) Fun d 3.Law Enforcement Grant Fun d 4.Public Art In-Lieu (Private Sector ) 5.Transportation Impact Fee Fun d 6.Los Osos Valley Road Impact Fee Fun d 7.Airport Area Impact Fee Fun d 8.Affordable Housing Fund 9.Open Space Protection Fund 10.Parkland Development Fun d 11.Fleet Replacement Fund (Along wit h interest earnings and sale of surplu s property, the General Fund is the primar y funding source for this fund .) 12.Water Fund 13.Sewer Fun d 14.Parking Fund 15.Transit Fun d 16.Whale Rock Reservoir Fun d Within each fund, projects are organized by functional area : public safety, public utilities ; transportation ; leisure, cultural and social services ; community development ; and genera l government . Priority Criteria.For each project, we have provided information about the "high priority " criteria used by the CIP Review Committee in initially evaluating CIP budget requests befor e recommending them to the City Manager for approval by the Council : 1.Does it help achieve a Major City Goal ? 2.Is the project needed to meet significant public health or safety concerns ? 3.Is there significant outside funding ? 4.Is it needed to adequately maintain, repair or replace existing infrastructure, facilities o r equipment? 5.Will it result in significant operating cost savings or productivity improvements ? 6.Is it required to meet state or federal mandates ? 7.Is it needed to meet the City's public art policy or funded through the private sector public ar t in-lieu fee ? FINDING S As reflected in this summary, every project meets at least one of the "high priority" criteria (an d many meet more than one). This is not surprising, given the high level of scrutiny that eac h received before being approved by the Council, and the detailed reviews that we have alread y undertaken in our efforts to allocate CIP funding to high priority needs . Based on our detailed review of the status of our CIP and priority criteria, no projects surfaced a s candidates for deferral or deletion at this time . Nonetheless, undertaking this type of detailed review on an ongoing basis is an important part of effective CIP management . BW1-88 • • • • Attachment 3 CIP STATUS AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2012 Percent Complet e 6%I0% 20% 30%40% 50%+3d% s0% UNDER CONSTRUCTION Tank Farm Widening - Broa d Stomldrain Replacements (2012-13 ) Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing (2012-13 ) Laguna Llit Station Replacement UNDER DESIG N City Hall Step Replacemen t Marsh Street Garage Paintin g n Bddoe Repa iir- Mission Plaz a Santa Rosa Skate Par k Rairoad Safety Thad Construction - Hathway t oTaft Playground Equipment Replacement - Johnson ,Santa Rosa, Emerson Parks Gateway Monument - Santa . Rosa & Highlan d Downtown Directional Signs Installatio n Calla Joaquin Lift Station & Forcemai nReplacement Bob Jones Bridge Construction - LOVR Water Reclamation Facility Energy Efficienc yProjects Water Reuse Automation Improvement s UNDER STUD Y Website Upgrade • Attachment 3CIP STATUS REPORT Phase Percent Complete Yea r Phase Approved By Council Project Priority Criteri a Major City Goal Significant Publi c Health or Safety Concern Maintenanc e of Existing Infrastructure Facilities o r Equipment Significan t Oper Cos t Saving& Productivity Imprvmnts Significan t Outside Funding Federal) or State Requirement Public Art Policy Other Priority Factors (See Notes Below) COMPLETED PROJECT S Air .OrtArea Ith acfee ;°..>.. Community Develo •men t AASP U•date 100 % ~a vital Outl Turf Public Safety PD On Duty Weapons _ 100%2008 x Fire Station Alert System 100%2008 x x Transportation : Street s Orcutt Rd Widening 100%2007 x x Osos/Santa Rosa Traffic Signal 100%2007 x Street Rconst 2011 100%2011 x x Microsurfacing 2011 100%2011 x x Chorro St R&R 100%2011 x x Walnut/Osos Drain Rep 100%2011 x Traffic Safety Report 2012 100%n/a Foothill/Tassajara Improvements 100%2008 x Grand/Hwy 101 NB Signalization 100%2008 x Hwy 1/Santa Rosa MIS 100%201 0 Transportation : Creek & Flood Protectio n Foothill Blvd Bridge 100%2000 x x x Hiquera CMP Replacement 100%2008 x x Highland SD replacement 100%2010 x x Monterey SD replacement 100%2010 x x Transportation : Pedestrian Improvement s ADA Improvements 100%2005 x x Curb Ramp 2011 Project 100%2011 x Transportation : Bikeway Improvement s RRST Phase 4A 100% _ 2008 x x Bob Jones Trail Bridge Connections 100%2003 x LOVR Srts Bike Path 100%2007 _x Transportation : Transi t Particulate Matter Traps 100%I 2011 I I I I I I I Leisure, Cultural & Social Service s Play Equipment Replace Meadow Pk 100%2007 x x Golf Concrete Walkway 100%2009 x Ext Paint PR Building 100%2009 x SPRR Freight Warehouse 100%2009 x ••BW AttachSt 3 CIP STATUS REPORT Phas e Percen t Complete Year Phase Approved By Council Project Priority Criteria Majo r city Goal Significan t Publi c Health o r Safety Concern Maintenanc e of Existin g Infrastructur e Facilities or Equipment Significan t Oper Cos t Savings / Productivit y Imprvmnts Significan t Outside Funding Federal ! or State Requirement Public Art Policy Other Priority Factors (See Note s Below) City to Sea Greenway 100% Community Develo I 4men t 2004 I I I I I General Government MS Office Re .lacement 100%2011 x Transportation : Transit Particulate Matter Traps 100%I 2011 I I I J I I ar%s,Erbt9 .4u t *~,n x`„w sr >c;<.r, Public Safety ,.,.. Mobile Radar Units 100%I 2012 J j x x I J I I1Oril$k14 !rot4r~, Community Develo .men t Open Space Protection 100%2007 x ifse Transportation : Parkin g Archaelogical Study Garage Artifact 100%2005 x Parking Meter 100%2002 I x I PW 4 DT Parking Sign Repl 100%2011 x PW 1 General Governmen t Copeland Downtown Archeology 100 % MS Office Re p lacement 100%2011 x Leisure, Cultural & Social Service s Play Equip Rep! - Meadow Pk I 100%I 2007 I I I x I I J x I Community Developmen t O . en Space Ac . uisition 100%200 7 J ° Leisure, Cultural & Social Services Nv 'y„~u 4 ry .td Buena Vista/Monterey Public Art 100%2007 x Oh Great Spirit 100%2010 x Utilit Box Beautification a,. 100%2010/12 xr'ps °. Public Utilities Park Ave Sewerline 100%n/a x Sewer Repl at RR Xing 100%2010 x Southwood Sewer Replacement 100%n/a x WRF Roof Repairs 100%n/a x BW1-9 1 Attachment 3 CIP STATUS REPORT Phas e Percent Complete Project Priority Criteri a Yea r Phas e Approve d By Council Majo r City Goa! _ Significan t Public Health or Safet y Concern Maintenance of Existing Infrastructure Facilities or Equipment Significan t Oper Cos t Savings) Productivity Imprvmnts Significan t Outside Funding Federal ! or State Requirement Public Art Policy Othe r Priority Factors (See Note s Below) Transportation : Street sStreet R&R 2012 ~100%I 2011 I ~I x General Governmen tUB S stem U ..rade 100%2011 x Transportation : Transi tTransit Facility Improv 100%2010 x Downtown Trans Coord Ctr Study 100%201 0 Transit Radio Replace 100%2010 x x Bus Replacement (9823)100%2011 x x General Governmen t MS Office Re .lacement `nSn~_.ti•r"Yg{Fr°'acr .,,0Hs. 100%201 1 1`-"I ";?~'ir ~+,x t=fa....m`'r`-4,t<,.~.,.,x .,.."~Transportation : StreetsStreet Reconstruction 2011 100%2011 x Microsurfacing 2011 100%2011 xMicrosurfacing Summer 2012 100%2011 x Orcutt Rd Widening 100%2007 x x x City Traffic Counts 2012 100%n/a Transportation : Bikeway Improvement s RR Safety Trail Phase 4 100%2007 x RR Safety Trail Phase 4A 100%2008 xRR Bike Path Phase II 100%2000 x Bic cle yPro/ects 100%1999 x x x Public Utilitie s Raw Waterline Recoat 100%I 2012 I I x Transportation : Streets Street R&R 2012 ~100%I 2011 I I I x 1 Transportation : Bikeway Improvement s LOVR Srts Bike Path 100%I 2011 I I 1 x I IGeneral Governmen t UB System Upgrade ]100%2011 I x ••BW • a Attachrit 3 CIP STATUS REPORT Phas e Percent Complete Yea r Phas e Approve d By Council Project Priority Criteri a Significan t Publi c Major Health o r City Safety Goal Concern Maintenance of Existin g Infrastructure Facilities or Equipment Significan t Oper Cos t Savings / Productivity Imprvmnts Significan t Outsid e Funding Federal ) or State Requirement Public Art Policy Other Priorit y Factors (See Note s Below) UNDER CONSTRUCTION/ACQUISITION r$$VI,yA yyyy55~~_ry <,'aA~~tl4°t v.F~.u~_j°RUA^.o p ~ F t~=erv~A ,it+"F'i~bW _y 5 t3F i {P {#~ ~b e `f( ?n .vaf Gv,..hr{rb<d,e ~n ~ d f~:.1oxS t 5 mti<z is ~yY 1 ry ~.yi _" ~f ,.. Transportation : Street s Tank Farm Broad Intersect 75%2005 x x Public Safet y CAD Server Replacement 95%2011 x FS3 Engine Bay Slab 100%2012 x Thermal Image Camera 75%2011 x x x Transportation : Street s Master Acct Street R & R n/a 2007 x x PW 2 Master Acc't Neighbor Traf Mgmt n/a 2007 x PW 2 Downtown Imp 09-10 100%2010 x Downtown Beautification 100%2010 x x Tank Farm Broad Interchange 50%2005 x x St Light Repl - Broad S 95%2009 x Street R&R 2012 100%2011 x Microsurfacinq Summer 2012 100%2011 x Traffic Safety Report Improv 75%2003 x General Traffic\ Signal Improvements 5%2008 x Traffic Signal Modificications 5%201 0 Traffic Safety Report Improv 75%2003 x Transportation : Creek & Flood Protectio n Andrews Bypass 99%2005 x x PW 1 Master Acc't CMP Replacement n/a 2007 x x PW 2 Silt Removal n/a 2007 x x x PW 2 Storm Drain Replacment Var Loc 70%2010 x x Silt Removal - Various Loc 100%2011 x Transportation :Pedestrian Improvement s Master Acct Sidewalk Repair n/a 2011 x PW 2 Master Acct Sidewalk Access n/a 2007 x PW 2 Safe Rte 2 School Phase 2 100%_2010 x Leisure, Cultural & Social Services PR Admin Software Replacement 70%2009 x Play Equip Replacement n/a 2009 x Golf Course Tree Removal & Replacerr 60%2001 x Fountain A Marsh/Higuera Art 50%2005/07 x Irrigation Control Repairs 70%2007 x x BW1-9 3 Attachment 3 CIP STATUS REPORT Phas e Percen t Complete Year Phase Approved By Council Project Priority Criteri a Major City Goal Significan t Publi c Health or Safet y Concern Maintenance of Existing Infrastructure Facilities or Equipment Significan t Oper Cost Savings/ Productivit y Imprvmnts Significant Outside Funding Federal ) or State Requirement Public Art Policy Other Priorit y Factors (See Notes Below ) General Governmen t Radio System Upgrade 95%2005 xxx FoxPro Replacement 80%2010 x Laserfiche 80%2010 x x Em Comm Center Blade Wrn 50%2012 x Utilities Asset Management System 75%2012 x Ludwick Ctr Roof Re .l AlTalaEL5 10%2012 x Community Developmen t 3212 Rockview 6rRa'j?.n-80%2012 CD 2 r'Public Safety 'S`am $S Sv^;4F i1 M1Eyi5.9~[S'vfi~.._a aeI'>`a-.c ;Mn .i: Patrol Sedans 10-11 I 95%1 2010 I I x I I I General Governmen t 1Util Asset Manna ..rem~enyt S ste m l .Gr t4i j dif~fycertie,ft an .f ,it 75%2012 x f ry h,iF fL f.;ti Public Safety g Software Lic/AFR Proj 95%2008 x Traffic Collision Software ®.•.le r'A~W Y. 100%2008 x ~+z ~~~ nr f~"r'6 ;sue ,. Community Development W .Y:~.~.r «f J e ~ry Creek Mitigation 85%2007 x Froom Ranch Improvements 0%2011 x Transportation : Parkin g Parking Lot Resurfacing I n/a 2012 I I x 1 I I I 1 General Governmen t Laserfiche 80%2010 x x Fox Pro Replacement 80%2010 _ x PU(?C rt'Pund (Private'Sector Contributions},r Leisure, Cultural & Social Service s Fountain @ Marsh/Higuera 50%2005/07 x Meadow Park Comm Garden 75%2010 x •BW • a Attacht 3 CIP STATUS REPOR T ' Phase Percen t Complete Year Phase Approved By Council Project Priority Criteri a Majo r City Goal Significan t Publi c Health o r Safety Concern Maintenance of Existing Infrastructure Facilities o r Equipment Significant Oper Cos t Savings/ Productivit y Imprvmnts Significant Outside Funding fn''FeN %du. Federal l or State Requiremen t ~ Publi c Art Policy Othe r Priority Factors (See Notes Below) Rk ,j etjo'„ Public Utilities Al ,.:$:?. a .e `.kx:...3 :rcv Collection System Improvements n/a n/a x UT 1 Sewer Siphon Upgrade 90%2012 x Mid-Hig Impr Project 85%2012 x Tank Farm Broad Interchange 25%2011 x Sewerline Impr 09-10 60%x Sewer Liners 2011 100%x Major Equipment Replacement n/a n/a x UT 1 Laguna Lift Station Rep!2012 x WRF Major Maintenance n/a n/a x -UT 1 General Governmen t Laserfiche 80%2010 x x Fox Pro Replacement 80%2010 x Utilities Asset Mana .ement S stem 75%2012 x ti-ai Transportation : Transit n. Bus Maintenance Facility Ex 90%2007 x Bus Stop Improvements 80%2010 x x Staff Vehicle Rep!-VAN 97%2010 x Bus Cap Engine Rehab 86%2011 x General Governmen t Laserfiche 80%2010 x x Fox Pro Re p lacement 80 % ftll :actFee Fur111 ;~R 2010 x 7rans .ortation Transportation : Street s Tank Farm Broad Interchange 50%2005 x Traffic Safety Report Improvements 80%200 3 I x I I Traffic Model Update 90%2010 x Transportation : Bikeway Improvement s LOVR Srts Bike Path 100%200 9 V ~5yy x =R11e)'„o Public ~'Safety Fire Lateral Reim n/a I n/a I I I x I I I Public Utilitie s Reuse Hip-Margarita 100%2008 x UT 2 Water Meters and AMR 98%2010 x Raise Valve Covers n/a n/a x Tank Maintenance 10%2012 x Wtr Trmt Major Equip Maint n/a _n/a -x UT 1 BW 1-9 5 A CIP STATUS REPORT Phas e Percent Complete Yea r Phase Approved By Council Project Priority Criteria Majo r City Goal Significant Public Health or Safet y Concern Maintenance of Existin g Infrastructure Facilities or Equipment Significant Oper Cost Savings/ Productivity Imprvmnts Significan t Outside Funding Federal l or State Requirement Public Art Policy Othe r Priorit y Factors (See Note s Below) Transportation : Street s Mid-Hig Impr Project 85%2012 x Tank Farm Broad Interchange 25%2011 x Trench Repair n/a n/a x General Governmen t Laserfiche 80%2010 x x Fox Pro Replacement 80%2010 x Utilities Asset Management System 75%2012 x BW • Public Safet y PD Marked Patrol Sedans 75%2010 x Leisure, Cultural & Social Service s Librar Mural Project 50%2012 x Transportation : Transit Attach 3 CIP STATUS REPORT Federall Public or State Art Requirement Policy Significant Maintenanc e Year Public of Existing Phase Phase Major Health or Infrastructure Percent Approved City Safety Facilities o r Complete By Council Goal Concern Equipment Project Priority Criteri a Significan t Oper Cost Savings/Significant Productivity Outside Imprvmnts Funding Other Priority Factors (See Note s Below) DESIGN COMPLETED : IN BID PROCES S Bus Replacement (9710)x50%2011 Transportation : Streets Higuera Widening @ Marsh/High 100%i 1999 i x x i iTransportation: Pedestrian & Bikeway Improvement s Bicycle Facility Improv i 80%2007 x i BW 1-97 Attachment 3 CIP STATUS REPORT Phas e Percent Complete Project Priority Criteria Yea r Phase Approved By Council Majo r City Goal Significant Public Health or Safety Concern Maintenanc e of Existing Infrastructur e Facilities or Equipment Significan t Oper Cos t Savings/ Productivity Imprvmnts Significant Outsid e Funding Federal / or State Requirement Publi c Art Policy Othe r Priorit y Factor s (See Notes Below) UNDER DESIG NftalOutlay `FUnd Public Safety Cardiac Monitor Replacement I 5%I 2012 I I x x I I Transportation : Streets Street Sign Maintenance 40%2009 x - Directional Sign Program 60%200 7 Hwy 227 Signal Upgrades 50%2008 x Traffic Oper Rept Implm 80%2009 Transportation :Creek & Flood Protectio n Toro St CK Bank Stabil 60%2005 x x Storm Drain Culverts 50%2007 x x Bishop-Augusta Creek Bank 20%2008 x Flood Plan Phase II 100%200 8 Toro St Bank Stabil 60%2011 _ x Broad Street Bank Reinfor 5%2011 x Trans ortation :Pedestrian Improvements Warden/Mission Walkway 90%2011 x Safe Rte 2 School Phase 2 100%2010 x Transportation :Pedestrian & Bikeway Improvements Bob Jones Trail Connection 1 80%I 2011 I I I I I x I I ILeisure,Cultural & Social Service s Sinsheimer Equipment Replacement 20%2007 x x Skate Park Improvements 90%2008 x Play Equipment Replace Johnson Pk 40%2010 x x Play Equipment Replace Santa Rosa 65%2010 x x Play Equipment Replace Emerson Park 45%2010 x x Pool Boiler Replacement 50%2012 x x City Gateways 75%2007 x x General Governmen t City Website Upgrade 20%2011 x Wireless Net Infr Rep 100%2011 x City Hall Entry Steps 100%2011 xCdTnmunity DeveloptnentTSId5l(GrctSt r FOntl, Trans p ortation Pedestrian Improvement s CDBG Curb Ramps 2011 JCOYRImpactFeeArea Fuhd 35%2011 I J I x I x !x l Transportation : Streets Costco LOVR Reimb 50%2003 x LOI WY 101 Interchange 40%2003 x B W Attach 1 CIP STATUS REPORT Phase Percen t Complete Yea r Phase Approved By Council Project Priority Criteri a Major City Goal Significan t Public Health or Safet y Concern Maintenance of Existin g Infrastructure Facilities or Equipment Significant Oper Cost Savings/ Productivity Imprvmnts Significan t Outsid e Funding Federal l or State Requirement Public Art Policy Othe r Priority Factors (See Notes Below ) Transportation :Parkin g Parking Lot Reseal/Resurface 90%2010 x Marsh Street Paint - Phase 2 35 /0 2011 x Marsh Street Paint - Phase 2 35%2011 x General Governmen t Cit Website Up g rade 20%2011 x Patkl~.,ci ®-Jo,h1 "Ifv Leisure, Cultural & Social Service s Skate Park Imerovement 90%2008 x Public Utilitie s n xWRF Energy Efficiency 85%2011 x General Governmen t Cit Website Upgrade 20%2011 x General Government Cit Website U ..rade 20%2011 x ATOM Transportation : Street s LOVR/Hwy 101 Interchange 40%2003 x Traffic Volume Counts 60%200 9 I I x LOVR Interchange 40%2003 x Transportation : Bikeway Improvements RR Safety Trail Hwy 101 50%2007 x x RR Safety Trail lighting 50%201 0 Bob Jones Trail Connection 80%2011 x RR Safety Trail Hath/Taft 95%2011 x RR Safet Trail Taft/Pe ..er 25%2011 x Public Utilities Wtr Pump Station Anly I I 2012 I I x I I I General Governmen t City Website Upgrade 20%2011 x Wireless Net Infr Rep 100%2011 x BW1-9 9 Attachment 3 CIP STATUS REPORT UNDER STUDY y®s •2T Fir $KSx..0.... ~aA-',,..P.eas €•....e Y F 'l"Fw'.T s ?€t'~M '.+M1'$ST I h`..ess 3 -.~-fx sTransportation: Streets Marsh Sttrreett Brdge Repair 1 b0/%20 0 1 I PW 3 z I I Pavement Evaluation n/a 2011 x fl Transportation : Creek &Flood Protectio nMid-Hig By Pass Channel 75%2007 x x xTransportation: Bikeway Improvement sBob Jones Octagon Barn ~5%I 2011 I I I x Leisure, Cultural & Social Service sLaguna Lake Dredging 100%1999 xSinsheimer Stadium Building 70%2012 xBridge Enhance Art 0%2007 xMeadow Park Comm Garden Art 100%2010 x Community Developmen t313 South Street 0%2012 xWomens Business Center 0%2012 CD 1Homeless Campus 0%2010 x542 Hathwa Ac .u/Rehab 0%2012 CD2 Public Safet yFBC Command Vehicle 5%201 2r,m Ptun =4 ...5 x.. Trans • ortation :Parkin •Palm-Nipomo Parkin . Gara .e 50%2003 X -------Upgrade Pkg Struct Equipmt r r Unlit Cart Y'tgli Art Eun r atex ~•,r €*pct ,C;ext ;; Leisure, Cultural & Social Services ,, Bridge Enhancement Art 0%2007 x9-11 Memorial 0%2010 xJuiPad Purchas e Sll(~`„z.".'' 0%2012 x Public Utilitie sWW Infr Rep! Strategy 0%2011 xSanta Rosa Sewerline Repl 100%2012 ••BW 1 Attach t 3 CIP STATUS REPORT Project Priority Criteria Significant Maintenance Significan t Year Public of Existing Oper Cost Phase Phase Major Health or Infrastructure Savings/Significant Percent Approved City Safety Facilities or Productivity Outside Complete By Council Goal Concern Equipment Imprvmnis Fundin g Transportation : Transit Othe r Priority Federal)Public Factors or State Art (See Notes Requirement Policy Below) SLO Transit Pickup x0%2011 Transportation : Streets Public Utilities Salinas Dam Seismic 100%2006 x x x General Government Telemet S stem Upgrade 100%2005 x Public Utilities Whale Rock Silt Study 0%201 1 Old Creek Habitat Plan 80%2000 x General Government Telemetry System Upgrade I 100%I 2005 x i COLUMN L NOTES : CD1 - Business support for low income client s CD2 - Affordable Housing Project s UT 1 - Master account ; no project activity occurs here . UT 2 - Recycled water system expansion . PW1 - The Construction is complete ; however the project remains in the maintenance and establishment phas e PW2 - Master account ; no project activity tracked her e PW3 - Funding used for another project . Funding to be transferred to TIF to backfil l PW4 - Project Complete . Transfer remaining funding back into Completed Projects Fund for Parking Fund . BW1-10 1 Attachment 4 ATTACHMENT 4 LONG-TER M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN • city of san Luis osispo • Attachment 4 LONG-TERM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLA N •TABLE OF CONTENT S INTRODUCTIO N Overview Report Organizations CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS BY FUNCTIO N Public Safety Police Protection and Fire & Environmental Safet y Public Utilitie s Water and Wastewater Service s Transportatio n Street s Creek & Flood Protectio n Pedestrian & Bicycle Path s Parking Transi t • Leisure, Cultural and Social Service s Parks & Recreation and Cultural Service s Community Developmen t Natural Resource s General Governmen t Information Technology and Building s Cost Summary by Function 1 2 3 4 9 1 0 1 1 1 1 • BW1-103 Attachment 4 INTRODUCTIO N OVERVIE W What is a Long Term Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)? The Long Term CIP provides a glimpse in the future of the City . Many of our curren t infrastructure assets are not adequate to handle the needs of the future . Many streets mus t be built or widened, water lines and sewer lines must be extended into new areas, an d new parks must be built . At the time of General Plan build out, now assumed as the yea r 2050, the projects on this list would ideally be completed and in use for the residents o f the City . Why does the City need a Long Term CIP ? The Long Term CIP can serve as a blueprint to guide the Council's future investments . I t is clear that the Council will be making annual investments in infrastructure repair an d maintenance, but there will likely be opportunities to leverage grant funding to buil d larger infrastructure projects to complement or assist what new development provides . Without this plan for build out, the City may miss out on strategic investments that mus t be made in a timely manner to help facilitate orderly development . What projects are included in the Long Term CIP ? The Long Term CIP only includes new improvements needed to support General Pla n build-out, based on current policies, plans and goals in place today . Maintenance oriente d improvements, such as for pavement or storm drains, are not included in this plan . Whil e costs for maintenance only projects can be significant, those costs are incurred t o adequately maintain what we already have in place today . This plan focuses on the new facilities and infrastructure needed to support the City at build-out . How does staff determine which projects to include in the Long Term CIP ? Using the City's major policy documents, like the General Plan and the Circulatio n Element, City staff identified the improvements that need to be in place to accommodat e build out of the City. For virtually all of the projects in the plan, there is a link to a majo r policy document approved by the Council . In most cases, these links come from th e General Plan, while some others come from an adopted master plan . When would we build these projects ? Ideally, these projects would be built as part of new development taking place in the City . Realistically, only some of the projects could be built by new development, with man y needing to be built by the City using grant funds or some form of debt financing . The ke y purpose of the this plan is to have already identified the improvements needed i n advance, so that as development occurs (or funding opportunities arise) the City is read y to proceed with what needs to be built and where . How does the Long Term CIP fit into the two year Financial Plan process ? By considering the Long Term CIP in the context of the 2013-15 goal-setting an d Financial Plan process, these projects provide an important starting place in assessin g which ones might be a high priority to consider in the next two years . The list is a way for 1 • • BW1-104 • • Attachment 4 INTRODUCTIO N the Council to see the long term infrastructure needs for the City and have an "order o f magnitude" idea of how much it may cost to fully implement. With this understanding, the Long-Term CIP is one of the pieces of information for th e Council to consider in setting goals and priorities for 2013-15 . This Long-Term CIP i s conceptual, and in most cases, the projects have not undergone detailed analysis, no r undergone the rigor of the public review process . They represent City staffs bes t assessment of costs and scope based on what is known today, but may undergo change s in scope or importance as new challenges and issues emerge over time . In short, this report focuses on presenting the "inventory" of improvements that may b e needed at some time in the future, as a starting point in the goal-setting process to hel p decide which CIP projects will go forward . Crafting funding solutions for implementation based on Council priorities is the next step in the process, and an integral part of th e Financial Plan process . REPORT ORGANIZATIO N The report organizes CIP projects into the six major functional areas used in the City's Financial Plan : Public Safety Police Protection, Fire & Environmental Safet y Public Utilities Water, Wastewate r Transportatio n Streets, Pedestrian & Bicycle Paths, Creek & Flood Protection, Parking, Transi t Leisure, Cultural and Social Services Parks & Recreation, Cultural Service s Community Developmen t Natural Resource s General Governmen t Information Technology, Buildings 2 BW1-105 Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description Plan or Policy Link ~Cost PUBLIC SAFET Y Police l otection Land Acquisition for New Police Headquarters Police Facilities Master Plan 8,818,00 0 New Police Headquarters Facility Police Facilities Master Plan 33,705,00 0 Total Police Protection 42,523,00 0 Equipmen t Fire Pumper for Station 5 Fire Master Plan I 500,00 0 Facilities New Station 5 without land costs Fire Master Plan 3,000,000 Replacement Fire Station 2 & 3 Fire Master Plan 6,000,000 Station 4 Addition Safety Element 300,000 Total Fire and Environmental Safety 9,800,000 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY I $52,323,000 • • • 3 BW1-10 6 • • Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMAR Y Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost PUBLIC UTILITIE S Wale% ervices Master Plan Implementation Water Master Plan, October 2000 , prepared b Boyle En .ineerin . 7,740,00 0 Water Reuse Master Plan Implementation Water Reuse Master Plan, Sept 200 4 prepared by Dudek and Associates 7,400,00 0 Total Water Services 15,140,00 0 'a',,,r `r '"mod,.ezSsx,•L V _, Collectio n Buckley Lift Station Wastewater Master Plan AA, Oct 200 9 prepared by Brown and Caldwell 6,360,00 0 Los Verdes Lift Station Wastewater Master Plan PA, Oct 200 9 prepared b Brown and Caldwell 2,060,00 0 Calle Joaquin Lift Station Wastewater Master Plan AA, Oct 200 9 prepared b Brown and Caldwell 1,350,00 0 Silver City Lift Station Wastewater Master Plan AA, Oct 200 9 prepared b Brown and Caldwell 260,00 0 Treatment and Reclamation Master Plan Implementation Wastewater Master Plan, Oct 200 0 prepared b Brown and Caldwell 43,940,00 0 Plant Treatment Disinfection Modifications Estimated b Brown and Caldwell 4,100,00 0 Total Wastewater Services 58,070,00 0 TOTAL PUBLIC UTILITIES $73,210,000 • Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description Plan or Policy Link I Cost TRANSPORTATIO N Stret ~~ New Roads Prado Road : Broad to Higuera Circulation Element A .1 21,000,00 0 Prado at Higuera Intersection Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP)300,00 0 Buckley Road : Extend from Vachell to Higuera Circulation Element A .3 4,200,000 Bullock Lane Extension to Tank Farm Road Circulation Element A .4 3,200,000 Sacramento Drive Extension Orcutt Road Circulation Element A .5 1,600,000 Bishop Street Extension Across UPRR to Broad Circulation Element A .6 10,500,00 0 Santa Fe Rd : Realign s/o Tank Farm Road Circulation Element A .7, AASP 5,200,00 0 Santa Fe Rd : Connect with future Prado Rd Circulation Element A.7, MASP, Airport Area Specific Plan (RASP)1,500,00 0 Road Widenings Prado Road : Higuera to US 101 Circulation Element Al ,.B .4 6,000,00 0 Higuera Street - High to Marsh Circulation Element B .1 3,700,00 0 Orcutt Road - Broad to Johnson Circulation Element B .2 1,600,00 0 Orcutt Road - UPRR Crossing Widening Circulation Element B .2 2,700,00 0 Tank Farm Road - S Higuera to Broad Circulation Element B .3, AASP 5,750,00 0 South Higuera - Madonna to Prado Road Circulation Element B .5 500,00 0 LOVR - Madonna to US 101 Circulation Element B .6 500,00 0 Santa Rosa Street - Olive to Foothill Road Circulation Element B .7 3,200,00 0 Santa Rosa Street at Foothill (EB RT lane)Circulation Element B .8(a)1,100,00 0 Santa Rosa Street at Olive (NB RT Lane)Circulation Element B .8(b)1,600,00 0 Santa Rosa Street at Walnut (LT lanes)Circulation Element B .8(c)300,00 0 Santa Barbara Street Upham to Broad Railroad District Plan 1,300,00 0 Santa Barbara Street : Leff to Upham Railroad District Plan 260,00 0 Broad Street : South Street to Alphonso Four Creeks EIR 1,100,00 0 Freeway Interchanges Prado Road Interchange Circulation Element C .1 42,000,00 0 LOVR Interchange Circulation Element C .2 28,300,00 0 Route 101/HWY 1 (Santa Rosa)Circulation Element C .3 42,800,00 0 Broad Street/US 101 (Ramp Modifications)Circulation Element C .4 1,600,000 Other Street Projects Monterey Street: Santa Rosa to Grand Circulation Element D .1 15,700,000 Orcutt Road Grade Separation at UPRR Circulation Element D .2 21,000,000 Prefumo Canyon Road - Landscaped median Circulation Element D .3 525,000 Broad Street Dogleg Circulation Element D .5 375,00 0 Guard Rail Upgrade and Replacement Safety Element 1,050,00 0 Congestion Relief Projects Circulation Element 5,225,00 0 Neighborhood Traffic Management Circulation Element,LU 2 .1 .3 .850,00 0 Traffic Safety Mitigation Circulation Element 5,225,00 0 Broad Street Landscaped Medians (S of Orcutt)AASP 2,625,00 0 Broad Street Corridor Enhancement Circulation Element 2,100,00 0 Santa Rosa Street Corridor Enhancement Circulation Element 1,575,00 0 Foothill Road Corridor Enhancement Circulation Element 1,575,00 0 Undergrounding of Overhead Utility Lines Circulation Element 21,000,00 0 City Assistance : Neighborhood Improvements Housing Element 7 .3 .3 5,225,00 0 Parker Street Improvements Mid-Higuera Enhancement Plan 75,00 0 Brook Street Extension & Plaza Mid-Higuera Enhancement Plan 225,00 0 Walker/Pacific Closure & Plaza Mid-Higuera Enhancement Plan 225,000 5 BW1-108 • • • • • Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description I Plan or Policy Link ~Cos t Traffic Signals, Street Lights &Signals New Traffic Signals Circulation Element 2,625,00 0 Traffic Signal System Upgrade Circulation Element 775,00 0 Video Detect/Surveillance Circulation Element 1,050,00 0 Traffic Signal Communications Circulation Element 1,575,00 0 Downtown Pedestrian Level Street Lighting Circulation Element 2,350,00 0 New Street Lights ($15,000 Per Year)Circulation Element 325,00 0 Street Light Modifications/Upgrade Circulation Element 2,600,00 0 Downtown Pedestrian Signals Improvements Circulation Element 300,00 0 Billboard Removal Program Circulation Element 14 .11 2,100,00 0 Acquire 975 Broad Street, Extend SLO Cree k Path West of Nipomo Circulation Element 2,100,00 0 Crosswalk Lighting Systems Circulation Element 300,00 0 Street Lights at Crosswalks in Railroad District Railroad District Plan 100,00 0 Bridge Replacements Prado Road : SLO Creek Land Use Element 6 .4 .6E, OS 3 .2 .1E 4,700,00 0 California Avenue : SLO Creek Land Use Element 6 .4 .6E, OS 3 .2 .1E 6,300,00 0 Johnson Avenue : SLO Creek Land Use Element 6 .4 .6E, OS 3 .2 .1E 3,000,00 0 Chorro Street : Stenner Creek Land Use Element 6 .4 .6E, OS 3 .2 .1E 2,700,00 0 Madonna : Prefumo Creek Land Use Element 6 .4 .6E, OS 3 .2 .1E 1,450,00 0 Bianchi Lane : SLO Creek Mid-Higuera Enhancement Plan 525,00 0 Calle Joaquin : Prefumo Creek Land Use Element 6 .4 .6E, OS 3 .2 .1E 1,775,00 0 Murray Street: Stenner Creek Land Use Element 6 .4 .6E, OS 3 .2 .1E 2,100,00 0 Total Streets 315,135,00 0 Cuesta Park Detention Facility Waterway Management Plan 10,875,00 0 Mid-Higuera Bypass Channels Waterway Management Pla n Mid-Higuera Enhancement Plan 5,300,00 0 Elks Lane Bypass Channels Waterway Management Plan 12,850,00 0 Channel Modifications near LOVR Waterway Management Plan 6,800,00 0 Creek Bank Stabilization Waterway Management Plan 31,800,00 0 Creek Bed Stabilization Waterway Management Plan 22,600,000 Remove human-made obstructions from creeks Land Use Element 6 .5 .1C 5,225,00 0 Total Creek and Flood Protection'.`1t-t1" 95,450,000 .rb .^8 b 4 3 .'`r STS :i ~,.*..x 3{.+b 2.~..e fl ..+Satwn ..w we n ^..4H 'Oss c "...4 ...Aaf .a yj! Pedestrian m v .¢_ Complete Community Sidewalk System Circulation Element, Cl 5 .1 .2 18,254,000 Continue Program of Replacing Existing Curbs wit h Handicapped Ramps Circulation Element, Cl 5 .1 .3 6,273,000 Repave Pedestrian Crossings and Instal l Pedestrian Bulb-Outs Circulation Element 5 .0 .5B .523,000 Monterey Street Civic Center Plaza Installation Circulation Element 2,379,000 Garden Street Makeover Circulation Element D .4 345,000 Complete Downtown Mission-Style Sidewalks Downtown Plan ; Resolution No . 9114 4,280,000 RR District Boardwalks Railroad District Plan 400,000 Leff and Osos Improvements Railroad District Plan 309,000 Walk of History (West Side of Tracks)Railroad District Plan 523,000 6 BM-10 9 Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description Plan or Policy Link ~Cos t Bicycle Paths Bob Jones Trail (Prado to LOVR)2007 Bike Plan 2,300,00 0 Prado Road Bike Bridges 2007 Bike Plan 523,00 0 Bob Jones Trail (Elks to Prado)2007 Bike Plan 1,658,00 0 Bob Jones Trail (Madonna to Elks)2007 Bike Plan 1,255,00 0 Elks Lane Parallel Bike Bridge 2007 Bike Plan 366,00 0 Bob Jones Trail (Marsh to Madonna)2007 Bike Plan, Mid-Higuer a Enhancement Plan 1,464,00 0 Madonna Road Underpass 2007 Bike Plan 200,00 0 Bob Jones Trail (LOVR to Barn)2007 Bike Plan 523,00 0 Prefumo Arm (Calle Joaquin to Madonna)2007 Bike Plan 972,00 0 Madonna Road Bridge (to Laguna Park)2007 Bike Plan 1,673,00 0 Railroad Bike Path (Depot to Marsh)2007 Bike Plan 2,718,00 0 Railroad Bike Path (Marsh to Hathway)2007 Bike Plan 6,691,00 0 Railroad Bike Path (Hathway to Foothill)2007 Bike Plan 366,00 0 Railroad Bike Path (Foothill to Campus)2007 Bike Plan 162,00 0 Railroad Bike Path (Foothill Bridge)2007 Bike Plan 1,777,00 0 Path Along n/Orcutt to Laurel 2007 Bike Plan 136,00 0 Path Along Creek to Southwood 2007 Bike Plan 366,00 0 Railroad Bike Path (Laurel to Tank Farm)2007 Bike Plan 1,150,00 0 Bridge Over Tank Farm Road 2007 Bike Plan 1,568,00 0 Bridge Over RR @ Fairview/ Penny Ln 2007 Bike Plan, Railroad District Plan 2,091,00 0 Underpass at Industrial Way 2007 Bike Plan 732,00 0 Bridge from Sinsheimer Park to Lawrence Drive 2007 Bike Plan, Railroad District Plan 3,241,00 0 Railroad Bike Path (High to Roundhouse)2007 Bike Plan 240,00 0 RR Bike Path (Roundhouse to McMillian)2007 Bike Plan 753,00 0 Acacia Creek BP (Rockview to Damon-Garcia)2007 Bike Plan 627,00 0 Acacia Creek BP (Damon-Garcia to Tank Farm)2007 Bike Plan ; AASP 261,00 0 Acacia Creek Underpass @ SR 227 2007 Bike Plan 366,00 0 Union Oil Prop BP (Tank Farm to Buckley)2007 Bike Plan ; RASP 1,568,00 0 Buckley Road Path (Broad to Vachell)2007 Bike Plan ; RASP 3,450,00 0 Tank Farm Crk . BP (Tank Farm to Vachell)2007 Bike Plan ; RASP 1,464,00 0 Morro Street BB (Santa Barbara to Pismo)2007 Bike Plan 52,00 0 South Street Widening for BP 2007 Bike Plan 52,00 0 Bikeslot at California-Foothill 2007 Bike Plan 162,00 0 Bikeslot at South-Broad 2007 Bike Plan 142,00 0 Bikeslot at S .Higuera-LOVR 2007 Bike Plan 209,00 0 Bike Path (Flora to Fixlini)2007 Bike Plan 314,00 0 Laguna Lake Park (to Foothill)2007 Bike Plan 1,673,00 0 Marsh Street Interchange Mods 2007 Bike Plan 314,00 0 South Hills Path (Margarita Area to Exposition)2007 Bike Plan ; MASP 1,568,00 0 Railroad Corridor Palm Tree Planting Railroad District Plan 105,00 0 Total Pedestrian and Bicycle Paths 78,538,000 7 BW1-110 • • • Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description I Plan or Policy Link I Cost ,k ,..du mfM1+-'x..~u "-"-a ..3„3!u b¢a`£c~iw.;iuul .G lsfiY*rc~w'~a ...,aft+._..~x~'d>3-tlz9a NARF Parking Access and Parking Management Plan 31,350,000 New Parking Structure (1 every 5 years)Access and Parking Management Plan 62,725,00 0 New Parking Lot Acquisition Access and Parking Management Plan 6,275,000 New Meter Installations - E/o Santa Rosa Access and Parking Management Plan 52,000 Residential Parking District Implementation Access and Parking Management Plan 209,000 Develop Downtown Park and Ride Lots Circulation Element 12 .6, Access an d Parking Management Plan 2,100,000 Additional Passenger Loading Area Near Depot Railroad District Plan 105,000 Total Parking 102,816,00 0 Capital Bus Stop Improvements Short Range Transit Plan 418,000 Bus Expansion (1 Every 3 Years)Short Range Transit Plan 2,600,00 0 NARF : Transit Short Range Transit Plan 5,225,00 0 RTC Transfer Point Upgrade Short Range Transit Plan 775,00 0 Transit Signal Priority System Short Range Transit Plan 1,050,00 0 Freight Warehouse Transfer Center Regional Transportation Plan 1,350,00 0 Bus Yard Expansion Regional Transportation Plan 3,125,000 Total Transit 14,543,00 0 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION ~$606,482,000 • • 8 BW1-11 1 Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description I Plan or Policy Link I Cos t LEISURE, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL SERVICE Syy Parks Laguna Lake Park Master Plan Parks and Recreation Element (2 .55 .2)2,614,00 0 Laquna Lake Dredqinq Laquna Lake Manaqement Proqram 7,319,00 0 Margarita Area Neighborhood Park/Additiona l Sports Fields MASP/Parks & Recreation Elemen t (2 .53) 8,158,50 0 Orcutt Area Neighborhood Park GASP/Parks & Recreation Elemen t (2 .53) 11,111,10 0 Caltrans North Property Acquisition & Park Mid-Higuera Enhancement Plan 2,331,00 0 Other Parks to Meet 10 acres/1,000 Goal Parks and Recreation Element (2 .1 .1)71,639,40 0 Other Improvement s Mini Parks Parks and Recreation Element (2 .40)1,050,00 0 Tennis Courts Parks and Recreation Element (2 .40)625,00 0 Sinsheimer Park Master Plan Parks and Recreation Element (2 .56 .2)2,100,00 0 Community Center Parks and Recreation Element (2 .54)8,350,00 0 Meadow Park Upqrades Parks and Recreation Element (2 .54)260,00 0 Sand Volleyball Facility Emerson Park Parks and Recreation Element (2 .57 .5)105,00 0 Skate Park Major City Goal 2007-09 2,500,00 0 Golf Course Parks & Recreation Element (1 .33 .2)209,00 0 Total Parks and Recreation 118,372,00 0 Adobe Restoration Parks and Recreation Element (2 .57 .5)3,125,00 0 Railroad District Gateway Tree Plantinq Railroad District Plan 26,00 0 Historic Railroad Car Display Railroad District Plan 26,00 0 Public Art @ .5% of CIP Costs Art in Public Places Policy 8,725,00 0 Total Cultural Services 11,902,00 0 TOTAL LEISURE, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL SERVICES I 130,274,000 • • Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMAR Y Pro'ect Description Plan or Polic Link Cost COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 25,000,00 0Open Space Acquisition, Trail Development Conservation & Open Space Elemen t Creek Pedestrian Trail and Open Space Mid-Hi•uera Enhancement Plan 500,00 0 Total Natural Resources 25,500,00 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 25,500,000 • • 10 BW1-11 3 Attachment 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost GENERAL GOVERNMENT 650,00 0 Yn brrrtatron T S10 „ Document Management IT Strategic Plan, August 201 2 E-Government IT Strategic Plan, August 2012 250,00 0 Technolo•Mgt Tools/Security Improvements IT Strategic Plan, August 2012 225,00 0 Technolo•Data Center Improvements IT Strate•ic Plan, March 2001 813,00 0 Total Information Technology 1,938,00 0 BWIdrtt '.0 eSa 4=+ City Hall Expansion AWf J in , Conceptual Physical Plan for City Ctr , Facilities Master Plan : 1988-2010 1 t ro 20,000,00 0 Total Buildings 20,000,00 0 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 21,938,000 BY FUNCTIO NSUMMARY Public Safety 52,323,00 0 Public Utilities 73,210,00 0 Transportation 606,482,00 0 Leisure, Cultural and Social Services 130,274,00 0 Community Development 25,500,00 0 General Government 21,938,00 0 Total $909,727,00 0 Long-Term CIP By Function : $909 Million • ■ Community Developmen t 3% ® Genera l Governmen t 2% o Transportatio n 67 % q Leisure, Cultural & Social Services 14 % ■ Public Utilities 8% • 11 BW1-11 4