Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-10-2014 ph1 PPP TR-GP-R 96-13 (Pacific Courtyards CC 6-10-14 Admin).pdf1 Pacific Courtyards Zone Change & tract map for a mixed-use project with 9 residential units & 8,000 square feet of offices. GP/R & TR 96-13 City Council June 10, 2014 2 Recommendation As recommended by the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt a Resolution approving the General Plan Amendment reconfiguring the boundary between the Medium-High Density Residential and Office designations on the site, based on findings, including a finding supporting the preparation of an Addendum to the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration, and subject to conditions, and approving a Vesting Tentative Tract map, based on findings, and subject to conditions. 2. Introduce an Ordinance approving the Rezoning reconfiguring the boundary between the Medium-High Density Residential (R-3-H) and Office (O) zoning designations on the site, based on findings. 3 Vicinity Map Old Town Historical District 4 Mixed-Use Project Two separate buildings Podium oriented to Osos Street: 8,000 sq.ft. office on three levels Ground level parking 5 townhomes & 1-bdrm. Unit (affordable) Townhomes oriented to Morro Street. 3 townhomes – 2 levels of living over garages 5 M o r r o O s o s Required Project Entitlements Cultural Heritage Committee review – location in a historical district. Architectural Review – project design. Tract Map & Rezoning/General Plan Amendment: Recommendation by Planning Commission; Final Action by City Council. Same entitlements approved in 2008-2009 for a similar mixed-use project. 6 7 Project Review CHC – November 25, 2013 ARC – Conceptual architectural review on December 16, 2013. Planning Commission – Made recommendations to City Council to approve the zone change & tract map on April 9th. City Council – final action on zone change & tract map. CHC – review modified project design. ARC – final design review. City Council’s Role Take final action on the following entitlements: 1.The General Plan Amendment/Rezoning; 2.Vesting Tentative Tract Map; and 3.Environmental Review. 8 The Zoning “Flip” – adjusting boundaries between existing zoning on site 9 10 Proposed Zoning reflects proposed development plan O s o s M o r r o General Plan Amendment & Rezoning - Reasons for Support 1.Reconfigures existing zoning on site, rather than introducing new land uses. 2.Creates a logical land use configuration that is consistent with the area’s development pattern. 3.Single zoning category alternative did not accommodate project: All R-3 – doesn’t allow offices. All Office – doesn’t accommodate density. 11 Vesting Tentative Map 2928 Allows for the individual sale of both the residential units and commercial space in the project. One-lot common interest subdivision creates airspace condominiums (up to 8 commercial & 9 residential units). Subject to the requirements of the condominium regulations for open space & storage. HOA would be formed and oversee maintenance and use of common facilities. 12 VTM – Reasons for Support Complies with condominium regulations for open space & storage. Essentially one lot subdivision – allows individual ownership of both residential units & office spaces. Condition #6 – allows Community Development Director to review the final map to assure that it in substantial conformance with the ARC’s approval of the final design. 13 Addendum MND approved on 8-18-08 with previous approval of VTM 2928. Addendum updates project description and includes summary of any changes in impact analysis. Transportation mitigation measures not necessary. Conclusion: modified project does not result in new significant impacts. 14 15 Recommendation As recommended by the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt a revised Resolution (distributed through an agenda correspondence) approving the General Plan Amendment reconfiguring the boundary between the Medium-High Density Residential and Office designations on the site, based on findings, including a finding supporting the preparation of an Addendum to the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration, and subject to conditions, and approving a Vesting Tentative Tract map, based on findings, and subject to mitigation measures and conditions. 2. Introduce an Ordinance (Attachment 8) approving the Rezoning reconfiguring the boundary between the Medium-High Density Residential (R-3-H) and Office (O) zoning designations on the site, based on findings. Update to Section 2 on Page 4 of Draft Resolution Conditions: 1. The Land Use Element Map is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A. 2. The Community Development Director shall cause the change to be reflected in documents, which are on display in City Hall and are available for public viewing and use. SECTION 3. The Community Development Director shall cause the change reflected in Exhibit A to be reflected in documents, which are on display in City Hall and are available for public viewing and use. SECTION 34. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2928 16