Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
F-256
CITY CLERK'S FILE no. SUBJECT: CLPPXIS CERTIFICATE I, J. H. Fitzpatrick, the duly aopointed and acting City Clerk of the City of San Iris Obispo, do hereby certify to the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. The attached petition is signed by the owners of real property in the parking district proposed therein, as shown b; the last equalized assessment roll owning real property of an assessed value of not less than fifty-one per cent (51%) of the total assessed value of all taxable real property in said proposed district, as shown by the last assessment roll, and owning tenable land in the proposed district con- stituting not less than fifty-one per cent (51s) of the total area of all taxable land in said proposed district, 2. The total assessed value of all taxable real property in said proposed district to 62,782,820.00 and the assessed value of the taxable real property in said proposed district owned by the signers of said petition is a1,543,650.00. 3. The total area of all taxable land in said proposed district is 12701,758 square feet and the area of taxable land in said proposed district owned by the signers of said petition is 880,030 square feet. Dated: April 16, 1958. Clerk, C of "San iuis PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PURSUANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951 TO: The City Council City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo, California The undersigned petitioners, owners of real property in the parking district herein proposed, as shown by the 195T-1958 equalized assessment roll, owning real property of an assessed value of not less than 51% of the total assessed value of all taxable real property in said district and owning taxable land in said district constituting not less than 51% of the total area of all taxable land in said district, hereby petition for the forms- tlon of a parking district pursuant to the Parking District Law of 1951 (hereinafter called the "Law," being Part 4, Division 18 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California) and in accordance therewith propose as follows: 1. A general description of the boundaries of the proposed district is as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Nlpomo Street with the centerline of Marsh Street, thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Marsh Street to the Intersection thereof with the centerline of Broad Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Broad Street to the Intersection thereof with the centerline of Pacific Street, thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Pacific Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Garden Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Garden Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Pismo Street, thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Pismo .Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Chorro Street, thence Northwesterly along the centerline of Chorro Street to the intersection thereof with the center- line of Pacific Street, thence Northeasterly along the center- line of Pacific Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of ;;ants Rosa Street, thence Northwesterly along the centerline of Santa Rosa Street to the Intersection thereof with the centerline of Monterey Street, thence South- westerly &long the centerline of Monterey Street to the Inter- section thereof with the centerline of Osos Street, thence Northwesterly along the centerline of Osos Street t0 the inter- section thereof with the centerline of Mill Street, thence 1, Southwesterly along the centerline of Mill Street to a point which bear$ North 360 22' West from the most North- erly corner of Lot 1 in Block 19, thence South 360 22' Fast to the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1, thence Southeasterly &long the Northeasterly line of said Lot to the most Easterly corner of said Lot, thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Lot, and the extension thereof, to the centerline of Morro Street, thence North- westerly to the moat Northerly corner of the part of Block 15 conveyed to the City of San Luis Obispo, a municipal corporation, by deed dated March 19, 1951 and recorded March 20, 1951 In Book 602, at page 69 of Official Records of San Luis Obispo County, thence South 530 38, West along the Northwesterly line of said conveyed property 194.25', thence North 360 22' West a distance of 0.93' to a point, thence South 530 38' West, to the centerline of Chorro Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Chorro Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Monterey Street, as said Monterey Street is located between Blocks 10 and 11 of said City, thence Southwesterly along the centerline of Monterey Street to the Intersection thereof with the center- line of Broad Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Broad Street to the centerline of San Luis Obispo Creek, thence following said centerline in a Southwesterly direction across Block 8 of said City, to the centerline of Nipomo Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Nipomo Street to the point of beginning. 2. A general description of the parking places proposed to be acquired within the district is as follows: PARKING LOT A PARCEL 1: Lot 14, the Northwesterly 30 feet of Lot an a Northwesterly 80 feet of Lots 10 and 11 in Block 100 of Mission Vineyard Tract, in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, according to map thereof recorded in Book A page 143 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. Excepting therefrom a Parcel of land in the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 14, said Parcel measuring 35 feet on Chor. Street and 100 feet deep. PARCEL 2: That portion of Lots 11 and 15 and all of Lo—E-7-TR Block 100 of Mission Vineyard Tract in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, according to the map thereof filed in Book A, at page 143 of Maps, described as a whole as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Chorro and Pacific Streets; thence North 360 22' West along the Easterly line of Chorro Street, 70 feet to a point; thence North 530 07' East 124.30 feet to the Northwest- erly corner of the property described In the deed to George R. Lewis, recorded November 27, 1935 in Book 184, at page 468 of Official Records; thence South 360 22' East along the Westerly line of property described In said deed 70 feet to the Southwest corner thereof and to a point on the Northerly line of Pacific Street; thence South 530 07' West along the Northerly line of Pacific Street 124.30 feet to the point of beginning. 2. PARCEL 3: The Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 6, and tH—e—WorMeasterly 15 feet of Lot 7, in Block 100 of the Mission Vineyard Treat, in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, according to nap received March 8, 1873 in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. Excepting therefrom any portion thereof included within the lines of Marsh Street as widened. PARKING LOT D All that part of Block 17 of the City of San Luis Obispo described as follows: Beginning at the most Northerly corner of said Block, thence South 540 061 West along the Southeasterly line of Monterey Street 132.93 feet to the intersection of said Southeasterly line with the Northeasterly line of Court Street, thence South 350 54' East along the Northeasterly line of Court Street 230.19 feet, more or less to the intersection thereof with the Northwesterly line of Higuera Street, thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of Higuera Street 132.58 feet to the intersection thereof with the Southwesterly line of Osos Street, thence North 350 54, West along the Southwesterly line of Osos Street 229.42 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Saving and excepting therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: Beginning at the most Northerly corner of said Block, thence South 540 06, West along the Southeast- erly line of Monterey Street 60 feet and seven inches, thence South 330 541 East 129 feet and five inches, thence North 540 06, East 60 feet and seven inches to the Southwesterly line of Osos Street, thence North 350 54, West along the Southwesterly line of Osos Street 129 feet and five inches to the point of beginning 3. It is not proposed to acquire any public ways for Ingress to or agrees from the parking places herein proposed to be acquired. 4. A general statement of the improvements to be made or constructed on the proposed parking places is as follows: a) demolition of any existing structures; b ))) grading and levelling; c paving; d installation of appropriate markings and parking meters and facilities for draining, lighting and otherwise making said parking places suitable for off-street parking of motor vehicles. 3. 5. The limit as to time within which ad valorem assessments may be levied upon taxable real property in the Parking district herein described shall be thirty-six (36) years from the date of the bonds to be issued pursuant to the Law for said acquisitions and improvements; and the limit as to rate upon ad valorem assessments upon said taxable real property shall be seventy-five cents ($.75) on each one hundred dollars ($100) of assessed valuation. 6, The City Council of the City shall adopt an ordinance declaring and agreeing that all of the City Lands now owned by the City within the proposed district and being used for the purpose of public off-street parking shall for all purposes of said district be held, used and treated in all respects the same as the parking places to be acquired as the proceeds of said bonds, Said City Lands are described as follows: MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT NO. 1 In the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, those portions of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 15 described as follows: Beginning at the South East corner of Lot 6, Block 15, thence North 360 221 East 110 feet; thence at right angles South 530 38- East 5500 feet; thence at right angle: North 360 220 East 40 feet; thence at right angles North 530 38' East 50 feet to the Westerly line of Morro Street; thence at right angles North 360 221 East 22.12 feet along the Westerly line of Morro Street; thence at right angles South 530 381 West 194.25 feet; thence at right angles South 360 22' East 52.47 feet; thence at right angles South 530 38' West 108.67 feet; thence at right angles South 360 22' East 119.25 feet to the Northerly line of Palm Street; thence at right angles North 530 38' East along the Northerly line of Palm Street 304.91 feet more or lees to the point of beginning. MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT NO. 2 In the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, all of Lot 4 and those Portions of lots 3, 5 and 6 of Block 86 of the lands of A. Murray according to the map thereof filed for record May 1, 1876 In Book A, Page 145 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County and those portions of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in block A6 of the Mission 4, Vineyard Tract according to the map thereof filed for record March 8, 1873 in Book A, Page 143 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County described as a whole as follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly line of Broad Street, which is distant South 860 53' East 14.05 feet from the common corner to Lots 2 and 3 in Block 86; thence North 530 07' East parallel with the South line of Higuera Street 109.35 feet; thence at right angles North 360 53' West 14.75 feet; thence at right angles North 530 07' East 72.29 feet; thence at right angles South 360 53' East 57.75 feet; thence at right angles North 530 07' East 27 feet; thence at right angles South 360 53' East 47 feet; thence at right angles South 530 07' West 22 feet; thence at right angles South 360 53' East 87.50 feet to the Northerly line of Marsh Street; thence at right angles South 530 07' West and parallel with the Northerly line of Marsh Street 74.93 feet; thence at right angles North 360 53' West 74 feet; thence at right angles South 530 07, West 121.5 feet to the East line of Broad Street; thence North 360 53' East 110.3 feet to the point of beginning. MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT NO. 3 All that certain real property situated in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, and particularly described as follows: All that portion of Block 14 as designated on Harris and Wards Map of the City of San Luis Obispo, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of Monterey Street, in said City, distant North 540 6' East 227 feet 6 inches from the northeasterly corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets; thence running North 540 6' East along said northerly line of Monterey Street 52 feet and 6 Inches to the southwesterly corner of the lot formerly owned by Mrs. N.E. Call; thence North 330 221 West along the westerly line of said lot of Mrs. N.E. Call, 351 feet to the southerly line of Palm Street; thence South 530 38' West along said southerly line of Palm Street, 107 feet to the northwesterly corner of the lot formerly owned by B. Brizzolara; thence South 360 22' Feet along the westerly line of said Brizzolare lot 56.36 feet to a point; thence North 530 38' East and pparallel with the southerly line of Palm Street 38.08 feet to the easterly line of a lot conveyed by Nathan and Isaac Goldtree to W.J. Oaks by deed dated August 21, 1882, and recorded in the office of the County Recorder of said County in Liber "0" of Deeds, at Page 431 and following; thence South 350 54' East along the east- erly line of said Oaks lot 296 feet to the northerly line of Monterey Street and point of beginning, excepting therefrom all that portion thereof included within the present lines of Monterey Street. No compensation shall be paid to the City for said use of said City Lands. 7, A general statement of the public ways within the proposed district on which it is proposed that the City maintain or continue to maintain parking meters, the net revenues from which will be allocated and pledged to the pay- ment of the principal of and interest on any bonds issued to finance the acquisitions and improvements herein described and to payment of operation and maintenance costs of said parking places and to the establishment and maintenance of any reserve funds, sinking funds or other funds designed for securing or paying said bonds and the Interest thereon, is as follows: Both aides of Monterey between Osos and Chorro Streets; South side of Monterey between Chorro and Broad Streets; Both sides of Higuera between Santa Rosa and NSpomo Streets; Both sides of Marsh Street between Oses and Broad Streets; Both sides of Osos between Monterey and Marsh Streets; Both sides of Morro between Palm and Marsh Streets; East side of Morro between Marsh and Pacific Streets; East side of Chorro between Palm and Higuera Streets; Both aides of Chorro between Higuera and Pacific Streets; Both sides of Garden between Higuera and Marsh Streets; Both aides Of Broad between Higuera and Marsh Streets; East side of Court between Monterey and Higuera Streets; West side of Osos between Palm and Monterey Streets; South side of Monterey between Santa Rosa and Coos Streets; provided, that, in the proceedings relating to the formation of the proposed district and to the issuance of said bonds, the City shall provide that if, under the circumstances permitted by the Law, the City shall cease to maintain parking meters on some or all of the above mentioned streets or portions thereof, the City shall Install and maintain on other streets in the proposed district, on which meters are not now installed, parking meters which will produce net revenues in an amount equal to the net revenues of the parking meters no longer maintained; and provided, further, that to permit the inclusion in the proceedings for the issuance of said bonds of a covenant 6. against the operation by the City or the proposed district of other facilities for the public parking of motor vehicles which would compete with said proposed parking places, the City shall provide, in the proceedings relating to the formation of the proposed district and to the issuance of said bonds, that if and when and so long as parking meters are installed and maintained on any of the streets within the proposed district on which such meters are not now installed, all of the net revenues from said meters shall be allocated and pledged in the same manner and for the same purposes as the net revenues from the parking meters on the streets and portions thereof hereinabove specifically described. The period of time, measured from the date of said bonds, for which it is proposed that the City agree to maintain parking meters as aforesaid is thirty-six (36) years from the date of said bonds or such portion of said thirty-six (36) years as is necessary to produce from said parking meters net revenues which, together with other revenues and money available for the purpose, will be sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on said bonds as the same fall due. 8. The City Council of the City shall assume all the powers and duties of any parking place commission authorized to be appointed by the Council pursuant to the Law and shall not appoint any such commission. Respectfully submitted, 7. I�_ �Name and Address Date of Siiains #. /1— /9— rss G7 .srwr, ii /9oa .4"rr- 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 9A I, v_.r _:a,,;.,,, , Secretary for the Corporation certify that on _ �w.n , 1950; the Board of Directors authorised C-A.bino to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FURSUANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT LAN OF 1951. T�4ile _ G (seal) • V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA not County of San Luis Obispo I'25t, " �,—,- being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and to the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beet informatien and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the f;_day of 1957, and the day of %r m---. �.: Zjo?_S ' 1957. Subscribed and sworn to Were me this :_day of J dw4 f-., 1957'o in and for the County of San Dais Obispo California. MY. My Comaiaelon expires: Nate and Address Date or Signing 2, 3. 4, 5. 6. 7. 8. 9• 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 1T. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. None and Address Date Signing 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 1T. A. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 2T. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Data of S1Ln1[ a 6. 7. 8. lo. __ ✓ s x 12. 13. —a— ,9 rf¢6.1 !17.1 18. 19 J-sl3=.s6,-�4 car (t, _ rll9L% RT. 29. . f 30. / . , 31.E ,3 32. P/ /7 'j-, Q RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING A BRANCH MANAGER'S ACTION ON BEHALF OF THE BANK RESOLVED, that the action of E. J. Fabbri, Vice President and Manager of the San Luis Obispo Branch, in executing on behalf of the bank the following described document on or about October 31, 1957, is hereby ratified and confirmed; PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PURSUANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951 I, D. S. Langsdorf, the duly appointed and qualified Secretary of Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, a national banking association organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States of America, and having its principal place of business in the City and County of San Francisco in the State of California, hereby certify and declare that the foregoing resolution is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed and adopted by the Managing Committee of said association at a meeting thereof held on the 24th day of February, 1958, pursuant to the By-laws, at which meeting a quorum of the Managing Committee was present and voted in favor of said reso- lution; that said resolution has not been rescinded or amended and that the same is still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said association on this 25th day of February, 1958. Secretary of Bank of Amer ca National Trust and Savings A f ociatiop Excerpts from By-laws of Bank of America N. T. & S. A.: ARTICLE III COMMITTEES Section 1. Executive Committee. During the intervals between meetings of the Board of Directors, the general management and conduct of the Bank shall be vRsted in the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee shall be composed of such Directors as the Board of Directors may from time to time designate and appoint. The Chairman, the Senior Vice Chairman, the Vice Chairmen of the Board of Directors, the President, and the Senior Vice President, shall be members of the Executive Committee by virtue of their office. The Chairman of the Executive Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors. All members of the Executive Committee shall enjoy the same privilege of voice and vote and shall have the same rights and duties. The Executive Committee shall hold regular and special meetings at such time and place and upon such notice as may be determined by the Committee. Special meetings may be called by the Chairman of the Executive Cai- :,.ittee, or the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the Senior Vice Chairman of the Board, or any Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the President, or any five (5) members of the Executive Committee. Subject to the review of its actions by the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee shall decide all questions of policy and personnel, and shall have general management of the affairs of the Bank. It shall report its actions each month to the Board of Directors for its review and for such action as the Board may deem appropriate. The action of the Board of Directors thereon shall be recorded in the Minutes of the meeting and in the Minute Book in which the actions of the Executive Committee are recorded, which shall also indicate the names of the Directors voting for approval or disapproval. Section Z. Managing Committee. The Board of Directors shall appoint a Managing Committee which shall, during the intervals between meetings of the Executive Committee, exercise the lowers and perform the duties of the Executive Committee, subject to the review of its acts and proceedings by said Executive Com- mittee and such action as the Executive Committee may deem appropriate. The Managing Committee shall be composed of the Ex-Officio members designated in Article III, Section 8, of these By-laws and such other officers as the Board of Directors may from time to time designate and appoint. The Chairman of the Manag- ing Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors. Allmembers of the Managing Committee shall enjoy the same privilege of voice and vote and shall have the same rights and duties. The Managing Committee shall hold meetings at such time and place and upon such notice as may be determined by the Committee. Meet- ings may be called by the Chairman of the Managing Committee, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or by any three (3) members of the Managing Committee. Two - fifths of all the members of the Managing Committee shall constitute a quorum for • 2 the transaction of business. The Managing Committee shall report its acts and proceedings each month to the Executive Committee. I, D. S. L.ANGSDORF, the duly appointed and qualified Secretary of BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, do hereby certify and declare that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Article III, Sec- tions 1 and 2, of the By-laws of said bank; that said Article III, Sections 1 and 2, have not been rescinded or amended and that the same are still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said bank on this 25th day of February, 1958. �rq } Secretary of BANK OF AMERICA NAi1,ONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATIO V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Luis Obispo 9d_ ate- being first duly sworn, r deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said Petition were obtained by affiant between the, - I- day of .b .a (9c to [7 4 ., , 1957, and the day of 1951. i Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of -4 o a. 1951. —NOTARY PUBLIC/f in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. Name and d Address 2. \ 3.��1 �NI 4. 6. -� 8. rti 71D1> 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Date of SLVUrig 8 r I — Is, —s7 \` 8 I, _F�--��✓'^�,, Secretary for the d fl,?A ..'. Ah /74's Corporation certify that on P-, i •. 1950, the Board of Directors authorized J &)¢ a i- .Jr - to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN Ill IS OBISPO PURSUANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951. Title (seal) I, DONALD D. NRIOHT , Secretary for the Corporation certify that on 1958, the Board of Directors authorized /Aiowr, k: Z� " 7.10� to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FORnATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN IBIS OBISPO PURSUANT TO THE: PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951. Title SECRETARY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES THE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORp1A (seal) V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA Be: County of San Lute Obispo 4e , 4, ♦ i' n n /c , , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing an said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the /_ / day of i , , e w b , 1957, and the day et �be c r 1957. Subscribed and ewo to betere me pS this 2_day of CLu 195T1 NUTPUNT �9 V� In and for the County of San Lute Obispo California. F/ g My Commission expires: f 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. T. 8- 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Name and Address Date of 31pi].nL J V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA on:County of San Luis Obispo for% %T,aSPw,k'q , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signs- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beet information and belief of affiant, Sa an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signaturees, on said petition wore obtained by affiant between the /I- +day of �.,,,.- •�`, 1957, and the l_&�_day of 1957. G r Subscribed and sworn to before sus this day of 1957. .y f7Yv�•fn' - RC In and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expirest , 9. ea Data of Signing 4�4,a —,7 SW.1 tlm� 4.' i 5• 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19• 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 8. Resolution in re RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board Execution of of Directors, or the President, or any Vice Presi- Documents and dent with the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary Instruments of this corporation, with or without the seal of by Officers this corporation, may (1) make, sign, execute and deliver in the name of and on behalf of this corporation, all conveyances, deeds, quit -claims, leases, mortgages, powers of attorney, bonds of indemnity or other undertakings, contracts for the purchase or sale of real or personal property, re- purchase agreements, guarantees, reconveyances of property, releases and satisfactions of mortgagee, judgments, and other liens; (2) assign, transfer and deliver bonds, certificates of stock and other obligations and instruments belong- ing to this corporation; (3) make, sign, execute and deliver any other instruments, documents or agreements relating to or affecting the property or business of this corporation which may be found necessary, proper or expedient to be executed, signed or delivered in conducting the business of this corporation. RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, Treasurer, or any Assistant Secretary, with or without the seal of this corporation, say execute leases for periods not in excess of one year, and any of the above, or soy Building Manager, with or without the seal of this corporation, say execute month -to -month tenancy agreements. I, RA9DR11 BOYD, Secretary of the PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REALTY COMPANY, hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of said Pacific Southwest Realty Company at a regular meeting of said Board held on January 24, 1951; and that sold resolution has not been revosed and is still in full force and effect. Dated: February 28, 1958. C (SEAL) / Secretary of ACP IFIC SOUTHWEST REALTY A4OMPAKY 1, W.W.Sandercock , Secretory for the Sanderceck Transfer Co. Corporation IQ57 certify that on Dec. 24, , jsj /, the Board of Directors authorized me to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE, FOWiATION OF A FARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PURSUANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951. Title t�c.ii/f ( seal) (/ V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA Be: County of San Lute Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: yy That he Is ikf over the age of 21 years f aa.---"- the within-amt ; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beet information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the %/�/ day of p /�`�-'-�'•+7"C-ty . 1957, and the 7 't 'day of 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before ao d 2, offs y this ? - day of offs i957t in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. _ My Commission expires: 2 None and Address Dote of 31jnlrNg 1.P —4--t 3. 5. A 6. 7. T C4 y�� - /(,7.2 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. — 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. • Secretary for the Corporation •r�'sy 3. c. o. ° certify that on 1951F, the Board of TZ. F McCP°�b� k- Directors authorized v_ i?_ E J—W. to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE. CITY OF SAN MIS OBISPO FURMANT TO TIE PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951. /✓, t: Title _ UN�rf r O 4' �yt:xo y, FAO rx i ° . v E R I F I C A T I 0 N STATE OF CALIFORNIA es: County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and Is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing an said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beet information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote hie name, address, and date of signingy and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the /--! day Of �'c , d .. b.. , 195T, and the = "' ` ` day of Ac c e ,, 46• , 1957. f Subscribed and sworn to before me this o� day In and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. Now and Address Date of Silming w36aQf W • Ak" Aw i X6. 1z=11A 7. u w - ' 8. �/'� f?� ai/ '� zSt 2 4, _ - f 9. ,L .../ in4s z- 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 8. Name and,Addrese Date of S1[aint f"� t e QOWIt�P'3f'71SiiigSera , an a Obispo, Calif.) 2. 3. 4. 5• 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 1T. 18. 19• 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Rase and Addreea DateofSS[ninS 77 2. 3. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 8. Secretary for the Corporation certify that on 1958, the Bawd of Directors authorized to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FOMiATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN TIT. CITY OF SAN Ill I5 OBISPO PURSUANT TO M PARKING DISTRICT LAii OF 1951. Tit'( (seal) VERIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 set of San Luis OLblepo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the 'sladay of %I" , 19571 and the day of Za c. 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this, day of 1957. RMANY PUBLIC in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. Nano and Address Date of Signing ii a• By November 26, 1957 -nager gEF-i .- ran', c re n an 3. y, 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25, 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. / J °PD' I, ROBERT M. OLSON, JR. , Secretary for Security Title Insurance Company, a corporation, do hereby certify that on February 14, 1958, the Executive Committee of said Company authorized Bert L. Brown to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PURSUANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951. 2 ad. ) . Title Secretary 1 � V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA se: County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is over the age of 21 years &r4='Q-�.nv owwan..af -aw#- y-rwA }awiaLwg dbotrft doeer44ped iw the aititn ant t peONWon; that he solicited the signatures appearing an said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the day of 1957, and the day of , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 1957. in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. e0 and Addreee Date of 81 11nx 2. 3. 4. 5. 8. A 9. s 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. U. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 31. J 8. I, t:lizabeth Paden _, Secretary for the Meleand Corporation certify that on Janua ry 29 , 1958, the Board of Directors authorized klo r.- /3- u + A to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE. CITY OF SAN LOIS OBISPO FURSDANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT LAW OF 1951. Title Sec/Trees (seal) V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and Is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture Of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, to an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between they + ./ day of 1951, and the h. day of 19 5f. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 674 day of „ d _'�', 195♦. In and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. (�` My Commission expires:..2,-�:},/i"1/�`' 9. l - Name and Address Date of Signing 1� 1 777 JE-_C 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 8. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the day of 1957, and the day of 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this - day of , 1957. NUrAHY PUBLIC in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Comaiasion expires: Nano and Addroaa 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15• 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 22. 23. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Date of Signing V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA so: County of San Luia Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he Is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and to the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the y day of b e 1957, and the day of 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1_day of 6Lt-CL 195 NUTAKY PUBLIC in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: Z!1 . 9. j / p,.r Name and Address Dot* of Si= Inn 7 .C�l`.�. //',�5-'15% 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 8. I, R, E. SING Secretary for the CENTRAL SAVINGS_&_LOAF ASSOCIATIOA CerPoration successor's to G?VARANTEE RRILDING & LOAN ASSNu certify that on December 24, 19570 the Roard of Directors authorised MR. C. Y_FORD to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A PARTING DISTRICT IN TAE CITT OF SAN LUIS ORISPO PTTRSTTANT TO THE 9ARFI9G DISTRICT LAY OF 1951. Title (seal) V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss: County of San Luis Obispo { e7 J P 'e'S , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and to property..and taxable t-.described in the with1n-sad-furdg61Ra'pettft9np� that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beet information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the ''y day of J /--W-e rr X r , 1957, and the L''' day of -1ace L .4e . 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this. .e day of - a+ . a y , 1957. in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. Nana and Address Data of SirAing ,. 1. TELEGRAM -TRIBUNE COMPANY 2. fir ...��, By ...-�.1 President Dec. 1957 3. 4. 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. IT. A. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32, 8. I, F. M. MEYERS, Secretary for the TELEGRAM_TRIBUNE CUMPANY, a corporation, certify that on December 2, 1957, the Executive Committee authorized ROBERT W. GOODELL to execute on behalf of the above corporation the PiMTIUN FUR THE FURMATIUK OF A PARKING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PURSUANT TO THE PARKING DISTRICT .L�A.WWOOOF.L�1Z9.51. Secretary (seal) V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Luis Obispo as: //- /4 d e /, 4 l { , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beat information and belief of afflant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said Petition were obtained by affiant between the /+ `.. day of be a e 195T, and the oL_ day of �F 195T. Subscribed and swe to before me this .� day� fof Z ca't7 195-e in and for the County of San lAtle Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. Name and Add ss ?. 74. J 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Data of Signing V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA es: County of San Lute Obispo -,f n h+ ! [, ♦ w- , being first duly Sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and Is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he sew written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and Hate of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition rare obtained by affiant between the day of he o * h Yr 1957, and the day of 2.957. N /i Subscribed and sworn to before me this _day of .. +w• y 1957. In and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires 9. • Nw Amw DATE OF SloNTI* 3. n-t/_= �'itr, i'�, Q �6Gtse� .i :: �r �l�s-�i✓ ail.:; i�1 �y�A 4. s. s. s. s. 1c. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. L6. 17. 18. 19. 21. 22. 23.` 2 =.. 25. 26. W. 28. 30. 31. 32. 6. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA Be: County of San Luis Obispo 'V_,�'/t , being first duly Sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing an said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on Said petition were obtained by affiant between the I- day of 1957, and the day of }. , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this..: - day of -... „ ., 195?. NWARY PUBLIC in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. T. 8. 9. -- 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16, 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22, 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Date of Signing -�-ate-- 8. V E R I F I 0 A T I 0 N STATE OF CALIFORNIA 86; County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says; That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on Bald petition were obtained by affiant between the a Y /4 day of /Vase rn br•- 1957, and the -`f- / day of -,./�._y 1951. Subscribed and sworn to before ale this 3`Jd&V of - 49 i 2954 in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires:_C?p� Name and Address 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 17 18 20. 21. 23. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Date of 3lsning 8. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Luis Obispo as: AF is, +. te , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said Petition were obtained by affiant between the /--t /� day of .err e _ bey 1957, and the day of 1957. Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of +cccac —J, 19Y in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires:,- 9. Nan* and Addree* ., 2. X 3. 4. 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15, 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 26. 27. 26. 29 30 31. 32. Date of Signing 7 / 8. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1(j County of San Lute Obispo) M being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years end is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing Detl4len; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name It purports to be; that each signer to the beat Information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between theZ G iL day of 1957, and the " day of 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before ma this dy Ofyy _T_ - in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: L /1;14 91 • 9. L 11 Vase and Address 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. l� 10. 13. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 26. 27. 29. 30. 31. 32. Date or Sipdnji — '$ � , V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA es: County of San Luis Obispo A r s , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name It purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the W-)F !4 day of 1957, and the day Of b'e c+,.-Aber , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me D' this., day of 'c 'e: u= � , 0194 in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. �� My Commission expires 2cw- 9. Name and Addrean -3� a. 9 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 15. 16. 21. 22. 23. 24. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32, J Date of Signing /tn: • otC v 7, , y' z9 V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Luis Obispo V „f . =Xf �4 —, being first duly sworn, deposes and says; That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing an said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of afflant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the f��Aay of ?afyd:d: ti*� 1957, and the day of 1957. Subscribed and sworn �� to ``before me this _day of it/ren.yor 1957. in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commlasion expires: 9. ,. Nape and Address Date of Signing 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. _ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32- 8. V E A I V I C A T I 0 N STATE OF CALIFONNIA as: y Count of -flan'- Lu• ,�is .� Oblspe being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described In the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, Is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the day of 1957, and the day of , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this '_day of , 1957. Santa Clara in and for the County of San-Sas;s_OLlspo California. My Commission expires: July 15, 1960 to end fat th.. i mmy o1 \ ma Cl,n, Stnte m Coli(or nie. M�cbmm�,un expixw Ju{y 15.19W, 9. 0-3 Nana and Address / �_; G SJwc`tData of Signing 7 _�4 4R- • 'ram 5. 6. 7• 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 1 8. V B h I F I C 6 T I 0 N. State of California as; County of Santa Clara being first auly sworn, deposes and says; That she is one of the petitioners above named and is over 21 ,years and Is the co-owner of real property ar.d taxable land in the proposed narking district described in the within and m'oregoing petition; that signer herself wrote her name, aecress, end date of signing, and that said signature on said petition was obtained by af£Sent on the 3rd day of Lecember, 1J57. V.11helmina 'd,asley diced' d od wwan b 8w/on r OY FB,r.-% 1Dr—Z. MY COMMISIOM E%PI MES AMII 6, W5a State of California County of Monterey V E R I F I C A T I O N Be: CLARENCE F. WICKENDEN, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above nested and is over 21 years and is the co-ovner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing, and that said signature on said petition was obtained by affiant on the 6th day of December, 1957• C` 4^'roc. `Y Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th day of December, No-" Co:r_ty V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Luis Obispo �iTis�Es 'p U,) %.kC�J(eJ , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that -he solicit"-*%§ 3tsnnturea appo4d-pet4tten; that he-eaw written the signatures appearif&--tharaOb-and-that each signature is the genuine signs- tnre whose name it purports to be; that each aigne!-to-hha""bast information and belief of affiant, is an owner-sfbs%able-real-property and-#arf"rt said propoaad parking distrtsti that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that et}-a'f said signature$ on said WAS petition Wass obtained by affiant YeaWwew the day of mc'e� , 1957, and the day of , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1957. in and for the County of %an-4aia Obispo Oh"'^L - California. My Commission expires% - as.. n 9. Name and Address 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. - 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Date of Sing V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA se: County of San Luis Obispo cC [ [ 54 ('/✓4l/A'/ 1 , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signaturew appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beet information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the 3-.i day of 1957, and the > Y�4 day of No,. h... , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day Off yj • 195T. AKY i. LG4 4 LIC in and for the County of 3i(n Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 2 i Ague N J and Address Date of Signing 1• � ^ � �f _` �. [._ �5 - _ //gyp/S^] .� 2..-.ice, 3. 4. 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he 1s one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beat information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the day of 1957, and the day of , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this _day of , 1957. NVrAKY PUBLIC in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. r ' 3-N•si-10 2. -5. 7. a. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14 15. 16. 17. 18, 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 2T. 28 29. 30. 31. 32. Date of Signing Y S. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA Be - County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, Is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said Petition were obtained by affiant between the %r day of 1957, and the day of e r e 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this -_day of tZ2cE-cu- . 195-C in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My COMission expires: _' AS /rys9 9. Dace or signing 4. 77,17Tr4 1yAptJ /�/k�?JelLex/ 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 2T. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. J A V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA )) eas County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and 1s the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiart, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the 0_ day of 1957, and the J day of 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of kfg4� , 1957. NOTARY FUBLIC in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Cosssisslon expires: 9. Nave and Ad as 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. i 8. Dote of 3lfnln[ .z.! - z r' I)a ,0 2 - /! s Z V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Lute Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature Is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beat information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his none, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said c petition were obtained by affiant between the `�—day of �r du er" Le1957, and the day of Ne0e�, 4a;- 1957. Subsoribod and sworn to bafera mm this / % -day of t ' a �- , 1957. in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: -J V - 0 '' • s LJ 2. 3. �l 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 20. 22. 25. 27. 28. 30. 32 Dot* of SS 8. J V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA $e: County of San Luis Obispo 2•2L(..Q.Cf' , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed perking distriot described in do within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signs- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the /�A day of 1957, and the / day s 1957. Suboeribod and sworn to before me this 3 day of wzfzeee?-=K 195e� in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires: 9. Nana and A�ddreaja Date of Signing 2' 4. 5. -4 4L I L , 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13, 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 8. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Luis Obispo as; rTdrt (P 11 X/ /Ie4Oh , being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he Is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the beat information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and data of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the /'+` �Z day of /Vole n 6,f , 1957, and the day of lVo „ , 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me" this ay of 0v" , 1957. in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commission expires 9. w V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA as: County of San Luis Obispo Miles A. Fitzgerald being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the c.ge of 21 years and is the owner of.real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of afflant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the day of her , 1957, and the 22nd day of 1957. //ll //77 /mod 01��1� l Subscribed and sworn to before me this n.. day of November , 1957. NOTARY FUBLIC in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. My Commisalon expires: 9. V E R I F I C A T I O N .^>TATr OF CALIFORNIA ) sa: County of San Luis Obiapo� 11'r A I @ r�v -f , being first duly sworn, denoses and says: Thr.t he is one of the petitioners above named and is over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and taxable land in the proposed parking district described in Vie within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that lie saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and bFlief of-.ffiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affinnt between the /o ry day of Tj� ! , 195i, and the /5- day of , 1951. Subscribed and sworn to before me this /+'r' day of ' / , 195t. NOTARY PUBLIC f in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California. _;y Commission expires: • 2. 3. - l 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1.1. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Date of Sirning n � IC L Yo' r� u r Date of 31[ning ia- i 9,:�'7 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. i-LTE:- 16. Signatures on lines 1 7, inclusive refer to property under Code Nos. ;- :.:-02 and 2-433-01 17. 18. Signatures on lines 1, 3, 4 and 7 refer to property under Code ; _ - ,-og 19 20, Signatures of lines 3 and 4 refer to property 21 under Code No. 2-425-05 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 8. New and Address Dots, of 31snins s aaa <G. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. T. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. IV 8. V E R I F I C A T I O N STATE OF CALIFORNIA se: County of San Luis Obispo being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is one of the petitioners above named and Ilk over the age of 21 years and is the owner of real property and_, taxable land in the proposed parking district described in the within and foregoing petition; that he solicited the signatures appearing on said petition; that he saw written the signatures appearing thereon and that each signature is the genuine signa- ture of the person whose name it purports to be; that each signer to the best information and belief of affiant, is an owner of taxable real property and land in said proposed parking district; that each signer himself wrote his name, address, and date of signing; and that all of said signatures on said petition were obtained by affiant between the day of 1957, and the day of 1957. Subscribed and sworn to before me this `day of , 1957. in and for the County of San Luis Obispo California, My Commission expires: 9. G JACN�ON FwY 9�MwN. O. CNO. LEE o. NIEII .I.G.', [).JACKSON FAUSTMAN CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER R.A. 9ACRAMENTO 22, CALIFORNIA May 2, 1958 Mr. Richard Miller City Adminstrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mr. Miller: GA.... 0-so.$ This is to advise you that the findings in my July 23, 1956 report and the supplemental letter of July 15, 1957 concerning the city's off-street parking district are still valid as of this date. DJR:1 dk cc -Richard Bartle Sincerely, D. Jackson Paustman \1C.-: Uy MAY 1958 RECEIVED ow all &L0-CAL • D. JACKSON FAUSTMAN J YCn50wf CONSULTING TRAFi1C ENGINEER s [O�srt n[O Cu[.!~s~u, F. �i[ 330 iw IT n1OGE w o[E w. ncnEnL[ 2SACRAMENTO 22,CAUFORNIA December 2, 1957 City Council City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Attention: Richard D. Hiller Gentlemen: G L�os�au[ 49[e G I[e [n[ ] s0065 pursuant to the provisions of Section 35273.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the fol- lowing is my opinion concerning the proposed San Luis Obispo parking district: OJF:b 1. There is a public need for the parking facilities. 2. The proposed district covers the contiguous area needing the facilities. 3. Sufficient property within the proposed district will be benefitted by the facilities. 4. The proposed improvements are located and designed in the manner most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. Sincerely, ' Lr° D. Jackson Fsustman OD. JACKSON FAUSTNAN 0 O O N R O L T I N O T R A F F 1 0 CNMINCCM 1.{G MARIAN NAY SAO RAM [ NTO. OALI FO R N 1A July 23, 1956 To The Honorable The City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo California Gentlemen: Pursuant to your authorization of March 26, 1956, there is submitted herewith my report on "OFF-STREET PARKING PL.'I.N FOR THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO". Recommendations are made for the selection and de- velopment of three parking lots with a total of 112 spaces at a cost of $142,710. The cost of the program has been estimated on the basis of property appraisals by Mr. M. W. Fitzgerald, Realtor -Appraiser, and the City Assessor, and construction estimates by the undersigned. The sites recommended implement the existing three city -owned parking facilities by providing a balanced geographic distribution of off-street parking to serve all portions of the central district. It is believed that when the over-all program is completed, the short -time parking needs of San Luis Obispo will be adequately met for the foreseeable future. At a later date as the demand for parking increases, other parking facilities w1.11 be re- quired. Appreciation is expressed to City Administrative Officer Richard Miller and Planning Technician Don Johnson for their splendid assistance in gathering the basic infor- mation and data for this report. /mRespectfully submitted, �ust�man Jackson Fa DJF:nc R[R UTR[m [NRIN[[e e�.0 nT• M [[M[X�[EL 11O 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II III IV TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION I .Geography 1 Population 1 Motor Vehicle Registration 1 Trafficways and Transportation 2 Economy 2 Commercial Development 2 REVIEW OF PARKING CONDITIONS 3 The Study Area 3 Previous Parking Studies 3 Present Studies 4 Curb Parking Characteristics and Data 5 Curb Parking Space Inventory 5 Gross Parking Meter Revenues and Expenditures 6 Curb Parking Meter Revenues 7 Off -Street Parking Characteristics and Data 8 Off -Street Parking Inventory 8 Total Parking Spaces in Central District 9 RECOMMENDED OFF-STREET PARKING PLAN 10 The Recommended Sites 10 Estimated Cost 11 Site Selection Criteria 11 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENSES OF THE PROPOSED PARKING FACILITIES 13 Revenues 13 Revenue per Space per Day 14 Expenses 14 Estimated Annual Operation and Maintenance Expense 14 Net Income 15 Curb Meter Revenues from Proposed Parking District 15 LIST OF FIGURES ' Follows Page Figure 1 OFF-STREET PARKING 3 PLAN ' Figure 2 PARKING METER USAGE 7 Figure 3 PARKING LAYOUTS 11 1 LIST OF TABLES ' Table I ESTIMATED COST, OFF-STREET PARKING LOTS 12 ' Table II ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENSES 15 APPENDIX A METHODS OF FINANCING OFF-STREET PARKING 1 1 1 1 CHAPTER I ' INTRODUCTION Geography San Luis Obispo, the county seat of San Luis Obispo ' County, is located 190 miles northwest of Los Angeles and eight miles east of the Pacific Ocean. ' The City was founded by Father Junipero Serra in 1772. It was in San Luis Obispo that Father Serra built his fifth mission known as San Luis Obispo de Tolosa. Population The population growth of the City of San Luis Obispo ' has been spotty but steady. As indicated in the census figures shown below, both the city and county growth has been accelerated in the past fifteen years. This trend unquestionably reflects the over-all increase in population i❑ in California. City of San % In- San Luis % In - Luis Obispo crease Obispo County crease 1900 3,021 16,637 ' 1910 5,157 71 19,383 15 1920 5.895 14 21,893 13 1930 8,276 40 24,613 12 ' 1940 8,881 7 33,246 26 1950 14,180 60 51,114 54 ' 1956 17,229 21 58,000(Est.)13 Motor Vehicle Registration Motor vehicle registration for the City of San Luis Obispo is not available; however, a review of the San Luis 'Obispo County registrations indicates a growth at a greater ' rate than the population increase. 1 11 ' State Motor Vehicle Department figures show: ' San Luis Obispo County % Increase 1940 16,022 1950 27,594 72 ' 1951 29,738 S 1952 33,141 11 1953 35,178 6 1954 32,825 1955 35,486 ' Trafficways and Transportation U.S. Highway 101 and State Highway Routes Nos. 1 and 2 ' pass through the city. San Luis Obispo is served by the main coast line of the Southern Pacific Company. A number of trucking concerns operate into the area. Inter -city bus serv- ice is provided by the Pacific Greyhound Lines. Local bus service is furnished by the Green Bus Company. ' Economy The chief employers in San Luis Obispo are governmental agencies, particularly the State of California. In or near ' San Luis Obispo are to be found the California State Polytechnic College, the California Men's Colony (a State prison), the head- quarters of District V of the State Division of Highways, and ' Camp San Luis Obispo, the headquarters of the California National Guard Property and Fiscal Office. The city is a division point for the Southern Pacific Railroad. Recent announcements have been made of two industries that are planning to locate in the ' area. One concern manufactures steel office furniture, and the other women's undergarments. ' Commercial Development At the present time the central business district is the ' only retail shopping and commercial activity in the City of San Luis Obispo. This central area is reported to be the trading center for a population of over 30,000 people. There are no outlying shopping center developments of the type competitive ' with the central business district. 2 CHAPTER II REVIAW OF PARKING CONDITIONS ij The Study Area ' The central business district of San Luis Obispo is shown on Figure 1. The major retail and business establish- ments creating parking demand are found on Higuera Street from Broad Street to Osos Street, on Monterey between Chorro and ' Dens, and on Marsh between Broad and Osos. The 100% business block is on Higuera Street, between Chorro and Morro Streets. ' It is understood from the City Administrator that financing of the proposed parking plan is contemplated under the 1951 Parking District Act. On this basis there is shown on Figure 1 the recommended boundaries of the parking district for financing under this Act. The City's Financial Consultant, Stone and Youngberg, San Francisco, will develop the financing plan in detail. It is believed desirable, however, as an aid to under- standing this report, that general material on parking financing be included herein. Appendix A contains a summary of financing methods and statutes prepared by Stone and Youngberg. Previous Parking Studies Parking problems in San Luis Obispo have been under ' study for several years by the City Council, the Planning Com- mission, the Chamber of Commerce, and citizens' groups. Pro- ceeds from the use of curb parking meters have been used to acquire some off-street parking facilities which are described in a subsequent section of this chapter. ' In April, 1954, Mr. George Hasslein of the Department of Architectural Engineering, California State Polytechnic Col- lege, prepared a parking need survey. This survey consisted of a business to business canvass to determine the magnitude of the ' need; the extent of the existing facilities; and the area of greatest need. ' This report established total parking requirements through two methods: 1. Assuming that two square feet of parking would be required for each square foot of business floor area. 2. By questioning each individual business in the ' central district as to its parking needs for both customers and employees. 11 SANTA AOSA 1 r ST. 1 1 1 1 f ; 1 w M N 1 090; 1 1 1 1 . 1 COUNT� 1 1 MORRO V ST, 1 SCALE A 1 W 1 � 1 1 m 1 OAROEN ST: 1 E 9A0AO Si 1 L9ROAO — ��--� ST. 1 1 —�1 1 1 iLEGEND 1 1 1 a 1 i 1 NIPOMO 1-II• '�jj _��• SL OFF- STREET PARKING SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 0. JACKSON FAUSTMAN CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER SACRAMENTO, CALIF JULY. 1959 FIGURE I This survey concludes that an additional 700 parking spaces are required, and that the area of greatest parking need ' is the block bounded by Morro, Higuera, Chorro, and Monterey Streets. ' The report goes on to recommend that sites be acquired in the following areas: 1. The block bounded by Morro, Marsh. Chorro, and ' Higuera. 2. The block bounded by Garden, Marsh, Broad, and ' Higuera Streets. 3. The block bounded by Gans, Higuera, Morro, and ' Monterey, with consideration to use of Court Street which lies within this block. At the time of this study it was determined that there ' were a total of 1246 parking spaces in the central district. Subsequent to Mr. Hasslein's report, Mr. Peter C. W. ' Patsch, realtor-appraiser of Santa Barbara, on August 25, 1954, appraised a number of parcels of property in the general lo- cations recommended by Mr. Hasslein. In this appraisal report, Mr. Patsch made some recommendations on the need for additional ' parking spaces in San Luis Obispo. Certain assumptions were made regarding the relationship of retail sales and parking space requirements; on the basis of using information from sales ' tax sources he estimates a peak day shortage of parking spaces ranging from 172 to 465 spaces. ' Of the various parcels appraised in the Patsch report, two have been acquired and converted into what is known as City Parking Lot No. 2, one parcel has been purchased by the City to be developed into a park, one parcel has been purchased by the ' City for ultimate development into a parking lot, one parcel has been purchased and developed privately as a department store, and no action has been taken on the other three parcels. Figure 1 ' shows the existing City parking lots. Present Studies ' The information contained in the two reports discussed above has been reviewed and analyzed. A current inventory was made of all curb and off-street parking spaces in the central area. Existing curb and off-street parking conditions were ob- served during May, June, and July, 1956. This information has been correlated with the studies outlined above. Special segre- gation of curb parking meter revenues on a block by block basis 4 was made during the week of May 7th by the City's parking meter collector. Data on operations of the two municipal parking lots ' using meters has been analyzed. Investigations have been made of all potential parking sites and areas. ' All other pertinent factors have been analyzed and co- ordinated, including traffic patterns, land use, major generators of parking demand, future growth trends, new developments, and seasonal business trends as shown in statistics furnished by ' representative San Luis Obispo retail establishments. Curb Parking Characteristics and Data ' The inventory of the curb spaces in the central busi- ness district is tabulated as follows! ' CURB PARKING SPACE INVENTORY Metered Unmetered 24 1 2 Sub- No Park - Yin Hr Hr Total 1 Hr ing Limit TOTAL ' Central Dis- trict Study Area 24 303 117 444 182(Approx) 184(Approx) 810 1 Proposed Parking Dis- trict 24 287 102 413 108(Approx) 83(Approx) 605 Meter rates: 1 hr meters - 12 min/10; 1 hr/59 2 hr meters - 12 min/14;; 1 hr/50; 2 hr/10V 11 I I i ' S 1 The record of earnings and expenditures for all parking meters, both at the curb and in municipal off-street lots, is as ' follows: GROSS PARKING METER REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ' Fiscal Year 1952-53 1953-54 1954-55 55-56(Sudgeted) ' Gross Revenues $43,462.12 $40,291,06 $40,121.59 $41,076.81 Enforcement ' Salaries 5,400.00 7,608.00 8,064,00 8,496.00 Motor Vehicle 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 ' Amortize Motor- cycles 480.00 480.00 480.00 480.00 ' $ 7,080.00 $ 9,288.00 $ 9,744.00 $10,176.00 Collection 1,200,00 1,200.00 1,200,00 1,200,00 ' Repairs and Maintenance 3,578.31 3,884.09 4,177.39 4,113.50 ' Repayment of Meters and Misc. Capital ' Outlay 2,386.79 3,001.00 2,703.89 3,500.00 Employee Retirement 1,244.24 1,380,00 1,600.00 1,750.00 Subtotal $15.489.34 $18,753..09 $19,425.28 $20,739.50 ' Transfer to Off - Street Parking Reserve 27,927.28 21,537.97 20,696.31 19,260.50 TOTAL EXPENDITURES$43,462.12 $40,291.06 $40,121.59 $40,000.00 6 11 [J I 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 A segregation has been made of the curb parking meter revenues as follows: CURB PARKING METER REVENUES Annual Average No. Revenue Year Revenue of Meters per Meter 1951 $37.859.50 452 $83.75 1952 40,771.32 467 $7.30 1953 39,800,76 463 85.96 1954 38,037.13 451 84.34 1955 38,545,85 451 85.46 1956(Through June) 18,513.54 456 - It will be noted that meter revenues reached a peak in 1952, have dropped somewhat, and have remained fairly constant since then. Monthly fluctuations in meter revenue are of interest in analyzing the parking problem„ since this information can be used as a rough index of the demand for and the usage of curb parking space. The peak months of meter revenue are in the spring and in the pre -Christmas shopping period. The summer months of July and August and the winter months of January and February are the low revenue months. November, for some unex- plainable reason, is also generally a low month. Studies made by the writer in a number of western cities reveal that there is a direct relationship between business and shopping activity and parking. The block by block breakdown of curb meter revenues is useful in pinpointing parking needs and establishing those areas where parking demand was greatest. This information is an ex- tremely important clue in selecting sites, since experience has shown that if the curb is generally vacant, so will be any park- ing facilities which are located adjacent to the empty curb. This type of analysis also highlights the relatively short walking distances which the average parker considers reasonable or neces- sary. Figure 2 shows graphically this information on curb meter revenues. It will be noted that the highest average revenue per day per meter, 37¢, is in the 100% block on Higuera Street be- tween Chorro and Morro. Note that curb usage falls sharply on 7 -- PARKING \11 I I P I � %(;[' ' Higuera Street east of Osos. Curb revenues on both Monterey and ' Marsh Streets are relatively high. It will be observed that reve- nues drop in almost direct proportion to the distance from the major generators of parking demand. This finding emphasizes the need for locating additional parking facilities in close proximity ' to the major retail areas. This conclusion is also stressed in the Hasslein report. ' On an over-all annual basis it is computed that each parking meter at the curb grosses about $85 per year, which is equal to an average of 28C per day. These revenue figures indic- ate an average space usage per day of between 5 and 6 vehicles. Curb space usage studies made on a sampling basis indicate that parking time limits are being well obeyed by parkers. Evening parking demand is light, except in the immediate vicinity of the ' theaters, and on those evenings when the retail establishments are open. ' Off -Street Parking Characteristics and Data The inventory of off-street parking facilities in the study area discloses the following: ' OFF-STREET PARKING INVENTORY ' Short -time Parking Long-time Parking City Customer City private TOTAL ' 2 lots** 7 lots 1 lot* 11 lots 21 lots 98 spaces 201 spaces 123 spaces 222 spaces 644 spaces 15% 31% 19% 35% 100% ' Parking rates: *City Lot No. 1 - 10 hours/254; 2 hours/54. Classified as a long-time parking facility, although it also has a short -time rate. **City Lot No. 2 - 1 hour/50 ** City Hall Lot - Free, li hour limit, plus official car parking ' The customer lots are all provided as a free service to patrons. There are no facilities catering for a fee to short - time parkers except the metered City lots. The parking fee for ' monthly parking in private off-street parking facilities aver- ages generally between $4 and $6. ' 8 The usage of City Lot No. 1, containing 123 spaces, has been relatively constant for the paFt three years. City Lot No. 2 has been open only since December loth, 1955. This lot contains 53 spaces. The reported gross revenues from these two City off- street parking facilities is tabulated as follows: Lot No. 1 Lot No. 2 1952 $1,208.75 Dec 1955 $220.47 ' 1953 1,812.36 Jan 1956 273,19 ' 1954 1,721.43 Feb 227.80 1955 1,856.14 Nar 200.09 ' 1956 1,034.38 Apr 275.52 (Through June) ' Nay 207.13 June 216.79 ' Analysis of the usage of Lot No. 1 indicates that for about eleven months of the year each space averages only about 5q per day, whereas during December the average revenue per space is 1". ' This usage would generally be considered extremely low for a park- ing facility located only one block from the central business area; however, the fact that it is located up a 7% grade from the central district may perhaps explain this low usage. The daily revenues ' from Lot No. 2 have averaged 170 per space, which is good consider- ing that this facility has been opened only since late in 1955. tOccupancy studies of selected off-street facilities indi- cate a relatively high level occupancy of those lots catering to long-time parkers. Occupancy of the major customer parking facility, the Sears Roebuck Company lot, indicates a relatively heavy occu- 1 pancy of those lots catering to long-time parkers. Occupancy of the major customer parking facility, the Sears Roebuck Company lot, indicates a relatively heavy occupancy of over 80% during the peak ' hours of parking. The combined inventory of all parking spaces in the central ' district is as follows: TOTAL PARKING SPACES IN CENTRAL DISTRICT Curb Off -Street TOTAL ' Number 810 644 1,454 Percent 56 44 100 ' 9 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHAPTER III RECOMMENDED OFF-STREET PARKING PLAN The general public would consider a perfect solution to the parking problem to be an adequate supply of free parking space immediately adjacent to the ultimate destinations of all who choose to use individual transportation. A practical solution on this basis is, of course, out of the question. Since curb space is limited and can never be sufficient to supply the long range de- mand, the ultimate solution to the problem lies in the develop- ment of off-street parking space. There are two general classes of parkers requiring space in or near the central business district -- the short -time or shopper-parkers, and the long-time or all -day parkers. Various surveys indicate that the shopper -parker will not walk over one or two blocks to his or her destination -- in fact, the smaller the City, the shorter the distance the shopper will walk. Thus the long-time parker should be kept from encroaching upon the closer in facilities needed for customers. Parking meters as now used in San Luis Obispo are accomplishing this purpose, judging from the study of curb parking characteristics. Based upon this same premise of reserving close -in space for shopper-parkers, it is recommended that any off-street parking program for the central business district be designed primarily to provide shopper parking space. Any spaces not presently utilized by shoppers could, of course, be devoted to long-time parking with the understanding that as the problem becomes more critical, the long-time parkers would be shifted to spaces farther removed from the central busi- ness district. In selecting off-street parking sites the general lo- cations outlined in the Hasslein report have been carefully studied. Investigations have been made of all potential off- street parking sites in the central business district. Con- sideration has been given to past, present, and probable future parking conditions and needs, to existing curb and off-street parking characteristics, and to the location of the major gener- ators of parking demand. The Recommended Sites The sites recommended for acquisition by the City of San Luis Obispo are shown on Figure 1. The plan contemplates the use of parking meters and a self -parking method of operation. The 10 ' functional layouts of the proposed parking facilities are shown in Figure 3. 1 Pertinent information on the sites is listed as follows: ' Parking Site Legal Description Size and Area Spaces Present Land Use ' A a. Parcel 4, Blk 527 80' x 2193' 58 Dwelling, garage and 17,540 sq. ft. locker building ' b. 25' strip lying W. 25' x 115.4' of the E. 40' of 2,880 sq. ft. Vacant Parcel 2, Blk 527 ' B Lots 5 and 6 of Par- 90' x 120' 34 Service station cel 6, Blk 432 10,800 sq, ft. ' C S. 60' of Parcel 3, 60' x 96' 20 Vacant Blk 434 5,760 sq. ft. ___. ' 112 Estimated Cost ' It is contemplated that all structures will be removed from the sites, and that they will be paved and graded to a high standard. The appraisal of the Site A was made by Br. Maurice W. Fitzgerald, ' realtor-appraiser of San Luis Obispo. Sites 8 and C were appraised by the City Assessor. Construction and paving costs were estimated on the basis of current costs for such work. ' The cost of acquiring and improving the sites as parking lots is shown in Table I. An allowance of 4% has been made for other ' costs, such as legal, financial, engineering, appraising. court costs, etc. A 10% over --all allowance for contingencies is deemed prudent and advisable. Interest during construction has been added at 4% for six months. ' Site Selection Criteria ' Final selection of the recommended sites was made only after a consideration of a number of important factors. There are no pre- cise formulas and the plan was based on a careful balancing of the following items: 1. Integration into the over all _parking plan of the central n business district. Recognitiowas given tothe fact that the City ' owns and operates Parking Lots Nos. 1 and 2 and has recently acquired 11 11 SCALE m \ « I W � y I W no' 2 ' LOT "C" 20 Swes ' OSOS STj Q ' / a y R I GHORRO ST ' LOT "B" LOT "A" 34 Som" 56n 5veces PARKING LAYOUTS SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 0 JACKSON FAUSTMAN CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER SACRAMENTO, CALIF ' JULY, 1956 FIGUIIE 3 property for developing into parking on the north side of Monterey ' between Chorro and Morro. The additional sites chosen are so lo- cated as to provide a balanced plan from a geographic standpoint of serving all portions of the central district. ' 2. P sites are withiroximity to ma.l or generators of parking demand. The n what is considered the acceptable walking distance (500 feet) of all present and probable future major generators of ' parking demand. 3. Land cost. Land cost is considered to be within the ' economically feasible limits. It is pointed out that if the facility is to serve the maximum number of short -time parkers, it must be close in, with a higher land cost, in preference to more remote locations with lower land cost. T O O N C d' OOI .y N p1 a .-1 O W ' VI 0 O O O O O O O O O � N O N N O w � tO0 M tnD T d F{ Hl di .7-1 EO OI W C7 C to Ui z - Y C 4 w O w a O w w ti F ' a a m o 0 0 0 0 0l o v o w to w 0:.] O m N .-i d' I .. E. cm m a � 6 w y voi F O O y U F m C - M 6 O A 7. y 0 F O O M n O in �n M d 0 et 03 O w M� •+ n « W C W � wGX 01 .Ci -M ee p 9U cv m a.oa m U 4 0 Id N k N ti W M C N N y« m C b« d N 4 F e m C E O d w m m « U me U a es ti 40. w 4m <dw 4 G� E it O ❑ .+ F N V U �- 1 CHAPTER IV ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENSES OF THE PROPOSED PARKING FACILITIES Revenues In preparing the revenue estimate, consideration was given to past, present, and future parking conditions and needs, and to existing curb and off-street parking characteristics. These char- acteristics include space occupancy; length of time parked; vari- ations in parking demand over the day, week, month and year; rates now charged for parking; and other pertinent factors. The revenue estimates are predicated upon certain assumptions which are outlined as follows: 1 1. Rates ' a. It is considered essential that a fee be charged on the parking facility to: (1) Produce income to help defray operation and ' maintenance costs and debt retirement. (2) Preserve the integrity of present curb meter income, since free or extremely low cost park- ' ing would probably attract parkers away from the curb. Present curb meter revenue must be protected since the financing of the pro- posed revenue bond issue depends mainly on this source of income. b. The short -time parking rate recommended to yield ' maximum revenue under present conditions is 5 cents per hour, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The rate is the same as is now used for the curb meters. This rate ' is the same as is now used for the curb meters. This rate is contemplated for the use of either parking meters or attendant control of customer ' parking. C. Initially, in the interests of achieving maximum revenue and facility utilization, it is suggested ' that a group of parking spaces be allotted to all - day parkers at a monthly rate of $4. As the de- mand for short -time parking increases, the amount of all -day parking will be decreased. For esti- mating purposes in this report, 50 spaces are ' 13 � • i ' assigned for a five year period, then decreased proportionately each year to none at the eleventh year. 2. Future commercial activity. There will be no major removal of existing commercial and business activity from the ' district shown on Figure 1. 3. Appearance. The lots will be kept clean, well main- tained, and in general inviting to the public. 4. Average Revenue per Space. The estimated average gross revenues per space for the first through the eleventh year ' are listed below: REVENUE PER SPACE PER DAY ' Gross Revenue Spaces 1st Year llth Year Lot A 58 $0.15 $0.30 ' Lot B 34 0.15 0.22 Lot C 20 0.10 0.18 ' Expenses The annual operation and maintenance expenses for the pro- posed sites are estimated and tabulated as follows: ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSE ' Lot A Lot B Lot C PROGRAM TOTAL ' Enforcement $ 750 $ 330 $200 $1,280 Insurance 50 30 20 100 ' Audit (Fiscal Agent) 150 100 50 300 Utilities 50 30 20 100 Lot Repair and Maintenance 100 70 50 220 ' Meter Repair, Replace- ment, and Collection 700 410 240 1,350 ' Contingencies (10%) 180 100 60 340 $1,980 $1,070 $640 $3,690 ' 14 11 Parking meter maintenance costs are based upon actual San ' Luis Obispo curb meter experience. Under usual accounting prac- tices a depreciation reserve would be established for the replace- ment of the parking meters at the end of their useful life (esti- mated to be 15 years). Very few municipalities, however, follow this practice of depreciation accounting, and instead cover meter replacement as part of the annual repair expense. For this reason, the estimated cost of meter maintenance has been increased 15% to ' cover a limited program of meter retirement and replacement. Labor costs are included in the meter maintenance total. Enforcement is computed on the basis of one officer per 500 meters. ' Other direct expenses are self-explanatory and are based in general on the parking lot experience of similar facilities in ' California. Expenses are assumed to be equal throughout the life of the project. Although this is not strictly true, it is con- sidered accurate enough for estimating purposes. It is assumed that broad policy direction, general super- vision, and miscellaneous clerical work will be furnished by an existing City department and no specific charge will be made for ' this service. A 10% allowance has been made for miscellaneous items and contingencies. Net Income Table II shows the net income which would result from the operation of the proposed parking lots with the use of parking ' meters thereon, based on the revenue assumptions and expense estimates outlined herein. The net income shown in this table is the amount available from the facilities which can be applied to ' the amortization of the capital cost. It is not within the scope of this report, nor is it within the province of the consulting traffic engineer, to set up the amortization schedules for a bond issue to finance this parking program. It is the function of the ' financial consultant to determine how these net revenues, when combined with the curb parking meter revenues available from the proposed parking district as shown in the following paragraph, ' together with other possible sources of funds, can best be ap- plied to bond retirement. ' Curb Meter Revenues from Proposed Parking District The proposed parking district shown on Figure 1 encom- passes practically all of the existing curb parking meters. ' However, there are some twenty existing meters which would not be included in the district, and it is therefore necessary to estimate the annual gross revenues to be derived from the re- maining 424 meters within the district. Using the block by 15 block segregation of curb meter revenues, it was determined that the meters lying outside the district are grossing approximately $1,750 per year. During the past several years the total gross curb meter revenues have ranged between $38,000 and $40,000. On this basis it would appear that an estimated annual $36,000 gross revenue ($35,700 net) could be anticipated from the curb meters lying within the proposed district. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 1 1 1 i i f f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Average TABLE II ESTIMATED GROSS REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND NET REVENUES PROPOSED PARKING LOTS SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA LOT A LOT B Gross Net Gross Net Year Revenue Expense Revenue Revenue Expense Revenue 1 $ 2,700 $ 1,980 $ 720 $ 1,560 $ 1,070 $ 490 2 2,950 1,980 970 1,630 1,070 560 3 3,200 1,980 1,220 1,700 1,070 630 4 3,450 1,980 1,470 1,770 1,070 700 5 3,700 1,980 1,720 1,840 1,070 770 6 3,950 1,980 1,970 1,910 1,070 840 7 4,200 1,980 2,220 1,980 1,070 910 8 4,450 1,980 2,470 2,050 1,070 980 9 4,700 1,980 2,720 2,120 1,070 1,050 10 4,950 11980 2,970 2,190 1,070 1,120 11 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 12 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 13 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 14 3,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 15 5 200 1 980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 16 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 17 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 18 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 19 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 20 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1 070 1 190 21 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 22 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 23 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 24 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 25 5,200 1,980 3,220 2,260 1,070 1,190 $116,250 $49,500 $66,750 $ 4,650 $ 1,980 $ 2,670 $52,650 $26,750 $25,900 $ 2,110 $ 1,070 $ 1,040 TABLE II (Cont'd) ESTIMATED GROSS REVENUES EXPENSES AND NET REVENUES PROPOSED PARKING LOTS SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Lot C PROGRAM TOTAL Gross Net Gross Net Year Revenue EXPense. Revenue Revenue Expense Revenue 1 $ 600 $ 640 $ -40 $ 4,860 $ 3,690 $ 1,170 2 650 640 10 5,230 3,690 1,540 3 700 640 60 5,600 3,690 1,910 4 750 640 110 5,970 3,690 2,280 5 800 640 160 6,340 3,690 2,650 6 850 640 210 6,710 3,690 3,020 7 900 640 260 7,080 3,690 3,390 8 950 640 310 7,450 3,690 3,760 9 1,000 640 360 7,820 3,690 4,130 10 1,050 640 410 8 190s 690 4,500 11 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 12 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 13 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 14 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 15 1 100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 16 1,160 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 17 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 18 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 19 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 20 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 21 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 22 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 23 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 24 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 25 1,100 640 460 8,560 3,690 4,870 Total $24,730 $16,000 $8,750 $193,650 $92,250 $101,400 Average $ 990 640 $ 350 $ 7,750 $ 3,690 $ 4,060 APPENDIX A ' ' M E T H O D S O F F I N A N C I N G O F F- S T R E E T - - - - - - - - - P A R K I N G - - - - - - - 1 1 METHODS OF FINANCING OFF-STREET PARKING ' There are four principal methods of financing public acqui- sition of off-street parking facilities, and numerous variations of each. Private financing also has a number of well-known alter- natives for raising capital. The principal methods of public financing are described in brief as follows: 1. Pay -As -You -Go Method ' This is a method of acquiring land by lease or purchase for off-street parking facilities on a cash basis, out of general funds. It is limited by the funds that are avail- able and by the fact that it is a municipal budget item which must compete with other demands for community improve- ments. ' 2. Bond Issue This method calls for the issuance of municipal bonds, ' either general obligation bonds or revenue bonds. The former, although carrying a. lower rate of interest, are a lien against the city's property and require a two-thirds vote ' of the people for authorization. The latter carries a higher rate of interest, requires only majority vote for approval, and is serviced by parking revenues and/or parking meter revenues rather than taxes. The City Council or a parking ' authority could administer the funds. An interesting vari- ation of this method would be the purchase of the bonds, interest free, by a local merchants and property owners group. ' 3. Assessment District Plan ' This plan applies the principle of taxing only the bene- fited properties in the district where the parking facilities are established. An administering board levies and collects the assessments and operates the lots for the benefit of the ' district. 4. Parking Meter Funds This method assumes that parking meter revenues are a new source of funds over and above a city's general revenue for taxes, and that such funds should be used only for traf- fic control or parking facilities. Accumulated meter reve- nues can be used as a revolving fund for acquisition of land for off-street parking purposes. 1 ' ANALYSIS OF PARKING REVENUE BOND PROCEDURES (Prepared by Stone & ' Youngberg, Municipal Financing Consultants, San Francisco) As the name implies, revenue bonds are secured solely by revenues from a given source or sources. Their payment is not ' secured by the power of taxation, As a result, in order to suc- cessfully market an issue of revenue bonds it is necessary to providefor safeguards which will, in the minds of the potential ' bond buyers, assure them that the principal and interest of the bonds will be paid promptly when due. ' One of the principal safeguards required is a so-called "coverage". That is, the estimated net revenues pledged to the payment of the bond principal and interest must be in excess of actual requirements. The percentage of coverage required is ' dependent on the nature of the project and its revenues. For example, a revenue bond secured by revenues of a municipal water system which has a reasonably long earnings record may require no ' more than a 125% coverage or less, while an issue secured by reve- nues of a project having no operating record, where the revenues must be estimated may require as much as a 200% coverage. Ob- viously, a higher coverage tends to strengthen the security of ' the bonds and therefore reduces the interest rate at which the bonds can be sold. ' Other safeguards or covenants which are customary in reve- nue bond financing, and which are stipulated in the resolution of bond issuance, are as follows: ' 1. That the issuing entity establish and collect charges and tolls for the use of the facilities being financed which, together with any other revenues pledged to bond service, will be equal to at least the minimum coverage as explained above. ' 2. That the pledged revenues when collected be deposited with a fiscal agent (a bank or trust company) who shall distribute the same to the various funds and make payments ' on the bonds as provided in the resolution of issuance. 3. That a bond reserve fund equal to about one year's bond service requirements be established and maintained ' during the life of the bonds to assure prompt payment in the event the necessary revenues are not realized. ' 4. That the fiscal agent apply the revenues in approx- imately the following order of priority: ' (a) To the bond interest fund; (b) To the bond principal fund; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (c) To the bond reserve fund (if required); (d) To the operation and maintenance fund; (e) To a bond sinking fund; (f) To a fund which may be used at the option of the City for various purposes. 5. That additional bonds having an equal lien status and secured by the same revenues may be issued only when certain conditions are complied with. 6. That a portion or all of the bonds be subject to call and redemption prior to their respective maturity dates at certain prefixed prices. 7. That proper records of accounts will be maintained and that an annual financial statement applicable to the project be made available each year. 8. That no competitive projects be established by the City that would tend to reduce the revenues pledged to bond service, and that sufficient on -street meters be maintained to produce a designated minimum revenue. 9. That adequate insurance and fidelity bonds applicable to the project and its employees be maintained. 10. That the project will be operated and maintained in an efficient manner, and proper enforcement measures be taken to assure collection of parking charges. 11. That other covenants having to do with events of default, sale or condemnation of property, amendments to the resolu- tion, and other matters be adopted to safeguard the interests of the bondholders. The statute customarily used by general law cities for the issuance of revenue bonds is the Revenue Bond Law of 1941 (Govern- ment Code, Section 54300 et seq.). This act has been amended by the legislators to permit its use to finance off-street parking facilities. Underthisstatute the bonds must be authorized by majority vote at a city-wide election. A number of charter cities have amended their charters to permit the issuance of revenue bonds for parking. 3 ANALYSIS OF CALIFORNIA STATUTES RELATING TO PUBLIC ACQUISITION OF OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES Prepared by Ray H, Lindman ' of the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, California) Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 Streets & Highways Code, Div. 18, Part 1, Secs. 31500-31907 The Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 is a district act ' under which the cost of acquiring and improving parking lots is assessed upon the real property in the district benefited. In the explanation which follows it is assumed that the district is within ' a city and that the proceedings are conducted by the city council. However, the act also provides for districts in unincorporated areas under proceedings conducted by the Board of Supervisors. ' Throughout this discussion the legislative body of a city is re- ferred to as the "city council" although in some cities the legis- lative body is given a different name, ' The proceeding is initiated by a petition from the owners of the business property affected. The petition describes the extent of the district to be assessed, and describes the property to be acquired for parking lots and the improvements to be made thereon. After the petition is filed proceedings must be taken under ' the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Pro- test Act of 1931. This act requires that the city engineer make a report on the project, including an estimate of the cost and a tentative assessment spread of that cost. Notices are sent to ' each property owner showing the estimated assessment on his pro- perty. A hearing is held at which protests may be made. A major- ity protest, that is to say, written protests from the owners of ' more than one-half of the area of property in the district, termi- nates the proceeding. The purpose of this preliminary procedure is to give the property owners adequate information about the ' project and the estimated cost thereof before further proceedings are taken under the main act, 'tentionhdescribing t the he cdistrict ity cand athe tacquisitionscandfimprove- ments to be made, and fixing a further hearing. The ordinance is Published and copies are posted in the district and mailed to the Property owners. A majority protest made at this point will also terminate the proceeding. At the hearing the council may change the boundaries of the district by excluding property determined ' not to be benefited or by including additional property deemed to be benefited. The council may also eliminate portions of the proposed acquisition or improvement or both. After the hearing is concluded, the council adopts an ordinance declaring the district ' formed and ordering the acquisition and improvement. 4 1 � � i I Thereafter contracts are made with the owners of the properties 1 to be acquired, which contracts fix the purchase price to be paid following the levy of the assessment. In any case where a satis- factory agreement cannot be reached, condemnation proceedings are i filed and carried through to the point of an interlocutory decree determining the amount to be paid for the property. i At this point the amount necessary for acquisition is known, To this amount is added the estimated cost of the improvement and the incidental expenses of the proceeding. The superintendent of streets then prepares an assessment roll and apportions this total 1 cost among the individual parcels in the district in accordance with the estimated benefits to be received from the project. The act does not specify any formula for determining benefit, and thus al- lows the assessment in each proceeding to be spread in light of the facts of that particular situation. In instances where each par- cel is reasonably near to at least one parking lot, the superin- tendent might spread the assessment solely on the basis of assessed 1 value, area or frontage. However, if some parcels are a great deal closer to the parking lots than other parcels, the factor of dis- tance should be taken into consideration in determining proportion- ate benefit. A hearing on the assessment is held before the city Council 1 and modifications may be made. When the final assessment roll is recorded each property owner has 30 days in which to pay his assessment in cash if he so desires. A bond is issued against each unpaid assessment and these bonds must be sold for par. The 1 maximum rate of interest (not over 6%) is determined by the origin- al petition but the actual rate is fixed by the successful bid. The bidder who bids the lowest rate of interest is awarded the s bonds. Because the property involved in a proceeding under this Act is valuable business property, the interest rate obtainable is lower than on the usual assessment bond. In one proceeding the i bonds were sold at a rate of 3.4%. The principal of each bond is payable in equal annual installments, with interest, over a period of years determined by the original petition. The number of an- nual installments must not exceed twenty, iThe total amount of the assessment levied must not exceed 35% of the assessed value of the land in the district. The city s council may at any time prior to the levy of the assessment make a cash contribution of city money to pay a part of the cost of the project. sWith the money raised by cash collections, the sale of bonds, 1 5 1 (� and the city contribution, if any, the lots are acquired and improved. Thereafter the parking lots are controlled and operated by a board of parking commissioners appointed by the mayor, subject to confirm- ation by the city council. The act contemplates, but does not re- quire that the members of the Board be persons having business interests in the district. Freedom is given to the Board as to the method of operation. The parking lots can be free lots, can be operated with parking meters, or can be attendant operated. The ' lots can be leased to a private operator but the operator must con- duct public parking facilities, and whether the lots are operated by a private operator or by the Board directly, the rates charged must not be higher than those fixed by the Board after public hear- ing. While the facilities must be public, the owners of property ' in the district, their tenants and customers may be given prefer- ential rates by validation of tickets or otherwise. Limited an- nual assessments may be levied upon the property in the district for the purpose of maintenance and operation of the lots initial- ly acquired or for the purpose of acquiring additional parking facilities. Revenues from the parking lots may be used for these same purposes, and in the discretion of the Board excess revenues ' may be used to make proportional credits or refunds to the property owners upon the assessments levied. ' Either before or after t'.ie formation of a district the city council may adopt an ordinance providing that revenues from parking meters on streets within the district shall be used to maintain and operate the parking lots or to acquire additional lots. Under the alternate procedure provided in Chapter 11 of the act, it is also possible to use street parking meter revenues to make refunds to property owners on assessments. However, this alternate proced- ure presents a number of serious problems and there is a question as to whether or not it can be used satisfactorily. ' Parking Law of 1949 Streets & Highways Code, Div. 18, Part 2, Secs. 32500-33552 This act is not susceptible of a step by step analysis such as that given above for the 1943 Act. For the most part its pro- visions are ones giving general power without specifying any parti- cular mode of procedure. Under this statute the acquisition and 11 1 • • I improvement of off-street parking facilities are financed by the issuance of bonds payable from revenues from the off-street park- ing facilities and from street parking meter revenues. where this ' act is used no taxes or assessments upon property are levied to pay the bonds. ' The bonds are issued and the parking facilities are provided by a parking authority which is a public corporation separate from the city. There is no provision for parking authorities in unin- corporated areas of counties. The parking authority of a parti- cular city becomes operative by virtue of a resolution of the legis- lative body of the city. Normally the area within which the parking authority has ,jurisdiction is coextensive with the city itself but there is a provision whereby the jurisdiction of the authority can be limited to certain projects or to a certain area less than the whole city. It should be noted however that there is no provision ' for two or more authorities in the same city. The act also pro- vides that the city itself can, through its legislative body, exer- cise the powers of an authority, either as to the city as a whole in the event no parking authority 1s declared operative or as to ' certain projects or areas in the event that a parking authority has been declared operative only as to other projects or areas. The powers of the authority are vested in a body of five members who are appointed by the mayor with the approval of the legislative body. ' The act requires that any parking facility acquired by an authority shall be leased to a private operator following competi- tive bidding. The authority may operate the project itself only ' if no reasonable and valid bid is received. Revenue bonds cannot be issued by the authority until the ' voters of the city have, by majority vote, approved the revenue bond method of financing parking projects. There are exceptions to this general rule. See Sections 33101 and 33101.5. ' The act gives broad powers to the authority to provide covenants and agreements for the protection and security of the bondholder. These would, of course, include a covenant to fix such fees, charges and rentals for the parking facilities as would, when taken together with the parking meter revenues pledged to the payment of the bonds, be sufficient to pay the princi- pal and interest on the bonds as the same fall due, to provide ap- propriate sinking funds and reserve funds, and to provide for the proper operation and maintenance of the property. The authority it- self has no .jurisdiction to place and maintain parking meters on ' the public streets but for the payment of any bonds issued by the authority the legislative body of the city may pledge revenues from street parking meters installed and maintained by the city. i ' Municipal Parking Revenue Bond Law of 1949 ' Streets & Highways Code, Div. 18, Part 3, Secs. 33800-34859 Under this act, as under the other 1949 Act above discussed, t off-street parking facilities are financed by the issuance of re- venue bonds. These bonds are payable solely from the revenues of the project. There is no provision for the pledging of revenues ' from street parking meters to the payment of the bonds and there are no provisions for any taxes or assessments. No parking authority is created under this act. If used by ' a city, the legislative body thereof conducts the proceedings and issues the bonds in the name of the city. However, parking author- ities and parking districts created under other acts are authorized ' to finance off-street parking projects under the provisions of this law. Counties may also use this act. ' As in the case of the Parking Law of 1949, this act requires that the parking facilities be leased to a private operator upon public bidding. Direct operation by the city or other public agency is authorized only if no valid bid is received. ' Parking District Act of 1951 ' Statutes 1951, Chapter 1707 The basic features of this act can best be explained by com- paring it with the other laws already discussed. Under the 1943 ' Act the off-street parking project is financed entirely by specific assessments upon the property in the district benefited. Under the two 1949 Acts the project is financed by bonds payable solely from ' revenues, which in the case of the Parking Act of 1949 may include revenues from street parking meters. ' The 1951 Act combines the revenue and assessment features. The area of properties to be benefited is formed into a parking district pursuant to a petition from the property owners. The off street parking project is financed by the issuance of bonds of such ' district. Primarily these bonds are payable from revenues from the parking facilities. Revenues from meters on streets within the district may also be pledged to payment of the bonds. ' There is a requirement that so far as possible parking charges shall be made to produce sufficient revenue, when added to the park- ing meter revenues pledged, to pay the principal and interest on the bonds as the same fall due. However, in the petition for the formation of the district the property owners may elect that an ad valorem assessment be levied only if the revenues in any year have ' been or are expected to be insufficient to pay the principal and interest coming due. The assessment is limited both as to maxi- mum rate in any one year and as to the number of years it can be ' 8 J Municipal Parking Revenue Bond Law of 1949 ' Streets & Highways Code, Div. 18, Part 3, Secs. 33800-34859 Under this act, as under the other 1949 Act above discussed, ' off-street parking facilities are financed by the issuance of re- venue bonds. These bonds are payable solely from the revenues of the project. There is no provision for the pledging of revenues ' from street parking meters to the payment of the bonds and there are no provisions for any taxes or assessments. No parking authority is created under this act. If used by ' a city, the legislative body thereof conducts the proceedings and issues the bonds in the name of the city. However, parking author- ities and parking districts created under other acts are authorized ' to finance off-street parking projects under the provisions of this law. Counties may also use this act. 1 As in the case of the Parking Law of 1949, this act requires that the parking facilities be leased to a private operator upon public bidding. Direct operation by the city or other public agency is authorized only if no valid bid is received. ' Parking District Act of 1951 ' Statutes 1951, Chapter 1707 The basic features of this act can best be explained by com- paring it with the other laws already discussed. Under the 1943 t Act the off-street parking project is financed entirely by specific assessments upon the property in the district benefited. Under the two 1949 Acts the project is financed by bonds payable solely from ' revenues, which in the case of the Parking Act of 1949 may include revenues from street parking meters. ' The 1951 Act combines the revenue and assessment features. The area of properties to be benefited is formed into a parking district pursuant to a petition from the property owners. The off- street parking project is financed by the issuance of bonds of such ' district. Primarily these bonds are payable from revenues from the parking facilities. Revenues from meters on streets within the district may also be pledged to payment of the bonds. tThere is a requirement that so far as possible parking charges shall be made to produce sufficient revenue, when added to the park- ing meter revenues pledged, to pay the principal and interest on the bonds as the same fall due. However, in the petition for the formation of the district the property owners may elect that an ad valorem assessment be levied only if the revenues in any year have ' been or are expected to be insufficient to pay the principal and interest coming due. The assessment is limited both as to maxi- mum rate in any one year and as to the number of years it can be ' 8 levied. Under the act itself these limits are 75� per $100 assessed valuation in any year for a maximum of 36 years. In the original petition the property owners may reduce these limits. ' The act contains an alternate procedure under which, if the petition so permits, the power to levy the ad valorem assessment is not necessarily limited to those instances where the revenues 1 cannot be made sufficient. The act properly used has this advantage. If the project proves out, it will be self-liquidating and no assessment will be necessary. If the revenues are not as large as expected and an assessment becomes necessary the property owner knows in advance ' the maximum it can cost him. Projects which could not be financed with straight revenue bonds could be financed under this act be- cause of the additional security which the limited assessment af- fords to the bondholder. ' The original petition for the formation of the district must be signed by owners owning real property in the district of an ' assessed value of not less than 51% of the total assessed value of the real property (land and improvemnts) in the district, and also owning not less than 51% of the total area of lands in the district. ' The petition describes the extent of the proposed district and describes the property to be acquired for parking and the improve- ments to be made thereon. If an ad valorem assessment is to be provided the petition sets forth the limits as above mentioned. The ' petition also describes the streets within the district on which it is proposed the city shall install and maintain parking meters and sets forth the portion of the revenues therefrom which it is proposed the city allocate toward the payment of the bonds. The petition may also be conditional upon a contribution of money by the city to aid and assist in the project. ' There is provision for a report on the financial aspects of the project to be made before the resolution of intention is adopted. Before it can adopt the resolution of intention the city council ' must also agree to any proposals made by the petition regarding parking meters and city contribution. If it does not, the petition must be rejected and the proceeding abandoned. The resolution of intention to form the district describes the district and the proposed acquisition and improvement, and gives the essential data regarding the method of financing as proposed by ' the petition. It also fixes a time and place for hearing protests. The resolution is published and copies are mailed to the property owners in the district. A majority protest, that is to say, written - 1 • r 1 1 protests from the owners of real property in the district of an assessed value of more than one-half of the assessed value of all real property in the district, terminates the proceeding. 1 At the hearing the city council may change the boundaries of the district by excluding property determined not to be benefited 1 or by including additional property deemed to be benefited. The council may also increase, decrease, or otherwise change the pro- posed acquisitions and improvements. After the hearing is con- cluded the council adopts an ordinance declaring the district 1 formed and describing the acquisitions and improvements to be made. 1 After the amount to be paid for the property to be acquired is fixed either by contracts of purchase or by an interlocutory decree in condemnation, the city council issues and sells bonds 1 in an amount necessary to pay the cost of the proposed acquisitions and improvements and to pay the incidental expenses of the pro- ceeding. The bonds must be sold at public sale for not less than their par value. They may be made callable in advance of maturity. 1 The maximum interest rate (not over 6%) is determined by the resolution of intention but the actualrate is fixed by the suc- cessful bid. Broad powers are given to provide for covenants for 1 the protection of the bondholders. With the proceeds of the bonds the city acquires and improves the parking places. 1 The parking facilities are controlled and operated by a park- ing place commission appointed by the mayor, subject to confirmation by the city council. However, the original petition may permit the city council to exercise the powers of the commission. For the use 1 of the facilitiesthe commission must fix, after public hearing, rentals, fees or charges for use of the parking facilities. 1 If the original petition consents to the levy of an ad valorem assessment as previously discussed, the owners of property in the district, their tenants and customers may be given preferential rates. The parking facilities may be leased to a private operator 1 but the lessee must operate the facilities as public parking places and must not charge parking fees higher than those fixed by the lease after public hearing. 1 1 1 1 1 10 9 Diiw Mi[[xtlf[i�f x_[. its O.JACKSON FAUSTMAN CONSVLTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1 ]]O sn It91GOE [a �O SACRAMENTO 22.CALIFORNIA July 15, 1957 To the Honorable The City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo, California Gentlemen: G L�D[�Dx[ lR1AD GIL[[x[ 1 �000 Pursuant to the request of City Administrative Officer Richard Miller, information is submitted up -dating the statistics contained in my July 23, 1956, report on "Off -Street Parking Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo". In this letter report, the park- ing plan is modified with respect to the sites recommended in the July 23, 1956, report so as to depict the current thinking of inter- ested parties in the central district. I concur with the modified parking plan shown herein. The statistics which follow are referenced by page number to the basic report. Page 1 1957 POPULATION City of San Luis Obispo 18,000 San Luis Obispo County 65,000 e1Xr1 RO{e 1 1 7 1 I 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 I I 1 FE 9r. 1 YROAD XIXOYO MUNICIPAL OFF-STREET PARKING SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA O JACXSON FAUSTMAN CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER SACRAMENTO, CALIF JULY 1957 FIGURE 1 Page 6 00� WW O O p0 O O O O p0 p d .+ N y N N n O O O O O �O O v1 OJ ['1 r1 a• t0 O O a7 N O P P O p N P V N N V N y y y H O v�i aD O O o O N y OI OBI N pi H N P O P V O N t01 V O N a0 O V G P O c0 P w O O O 1 3 O 0 O O n O O 111I T H G N y N K C U N N N N Z N N O O O O O 1 1�1 N N O p O 1 m S H y N N K q d L C N C u ti d O 6 O u O b d q w Y y Q> q F +� O u w (y d d q w q q u Q O M C d > O q U a = O b> Z N N d 6 A O C C y V ti d L d m X. K d Y � Hp d A b W u (a1 C G L p EOE O V N W q q C a 2 Page 7 CURB PARKING METER REVENUES Annual Average No. Revenue Year Revenue of Meters per Meter 1951 $37,859.50 452 $83.75 1952 40,771.32 467 87.30 1953 39,800.76 463 85.96 1954 38,037.13 451 84.34 1955 38,545.85 451 85.46 1956 37,311.89 456 81.82 1957 (Through June) 17,473.89 479 - Page 8 OFF-STREET PARKING INVENTORY ADD: City Lot No. 3 - 58 spaces, opened December, 1956 52 short -time spaces - 1 hour/5c, 2 hour limit 6 long-time spaces - $24.00/quarter Page 9 GROSS REVENUES - CITY OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES Lot No. 1 Lot No, 2 Lot No. 3 1952 $1,208.75 Dec., 1955 $ 220.47 Dec., 1956 $ 117.74 (Ralf month) 1953 1,812.36 1956 3,030.97 1954 1,721.43 1957 (Through 1957 (Through June) 1,278.22 June)1,064.74 1955 1,856.14 1956 2,326.34 1957 (Through June) 1,232.02 3 J Page 11 PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING PLAN (Refer to Figure 1 attached) Parking Site Legal Description Spaces Present Land Use A a. Parcel 4, Elk 527, except 65 Dwelling, garage and the N. 35' to a depth of locker building 100, b. 25' strip lying W. of the E. 40' of Parcel 2, Blk 527 C. Parcel 5, Elk 527 D a. Parcels 1 and 3, Blk 433 Vacant Parking Lot 95 1 and 2-story business buildings and service station 160 TABLE I (Follows Page 12) ESTIMATED COST OFF-STREET PARKING LOTS Appraised value of site Clearing, grading, paving, marking, etc. (3) Parking meters Professional fees (4%) Contingencies (4) Interest during con- struction (5% for 4 months) Lot A $75,180 (1) 12,000 4,870 3,680 4,790 Lot D $220,000 (2) 24,000 7,120 10,040 26,120 4,790 $292,070 Car spaces 65 95 Cost/car space $ 1,570 $ 3,070 1,680 $102,200 PROGRAM TOTAL $295,180 (1) Under option (2) Appraisal by City Assessor (3) Estimate by D. Jackson Faustman, Consulting Traffic Engineer (4) Contingencies - 5% on Lot A, 10% on Lot D 36,000 11,990 13,720 30,910 6,470 $394,270 160 $ 2,460 4 11 Page 14 REVENUE PER SPACE PER DAY Gross Revenue Spaces 1st Year llth Year Lot A 65 $0.15 $0.30 Lot D 95 0.15 0.30 ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSE PROGRAM Lot A Lot D TOTAL Enforcement $ 800 $ 1,000 $ 11800 Insurance 50 100 150 Audit (Fiscal Agent) 150 250 400 Utilities 70 100 170 Lot Repair and Maintenance 150 200 350 Meter Repair, Replace- ment, and Collection 840 1,200 2,040 Contingencies (10%) 200 300 500 $ 2,260 S 3,150 $ 5,410 Page 15 CURB METER REVENUES FROM PROPOSED PARKING DISTRICT Total curb meters in central area 479 Total curb meters in district 441 (479 less 20 meters outside district, plus 18 meters on Court Street absorbed by Lot D) Gross revenue - central area meters $ 38,000 Gross revenue - meters to be eliminated 2,500 Gross revenue - curb meters in proposed district 35,500 5 TABLE II (Follows Paste 16) ESTIMATED GROSS REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND NET REVENUES PROPOSED PARKING LOTS LOT A LOT D Gross Net Gross Net Year Revenue Expense Revenue Revenue Expense Revenue 1 S 2,980 $ 2,260 $ 720 $ 4,360 $ 3,150 $ 1,210 2 3,280 2,260 1,020 4,800 3,150 1,650 3 3,580 2,260 1,320 5,240 3,150 2,090 4 3,880 2,260 1,620 5,680 3,150 2,530 5 4,180 2,260 1,920 6,120 3,150 2,970 6 4,480 2,260 2,220 6,560 3,150 3,410 7 4,780 2,260 2,520 7,000 3,150 3,850 8 5,080 2,260 2,820 7,440 3,150 4,290 9 5,380 2,260 3,120 7,880 3,150 4,730 10 5,680 2,260 3,420 8,320 3,150 5,170 11 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 12 51980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 13 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 59610 14 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 5 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 16 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 17 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 18 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 19 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 20 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 21 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 22 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 23 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 24 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 25 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 Total $133,000 $56,500 $76,500 $194,800 $78,750 $116,050 Average $ 5,320 $ 2,260 $ 3,060 $ 7,790 $ 3,150 $ 4,640 6 TABLE II (Follows Paae 16) (Continued) ESTIMATED GROSS REVENUES, EXPENSES. AND NET REVENUES PROPOSED PARKING LOTS PROGRAM TOTAL Gross Net Year Revenue Expense Revenue 1 $ 7,340 $ 5,410 $ 1,930 2 8,080 5,410 2,670 3 8,820 5,410 3,410 4 9,560 5,410 4,150 5 10,300 5.410 4,890 6 11,040 5,410 5,630 7 11,780 5,410 6,370 8 12,520 5,410 7,110 9 13,260 5,410 7,850 10 14,000 5,410 8,590 11 14,740 5,410 9,330 12 14,740 5,410 9,330 13 14,740 5,410 9,330 14 14,740 5,410 9,330 15 14,740 5,410 9,330 16 14,740 5,410 9,330 17 14,740 5,410 9,330 18 14,740 5,410 9,330 19 14,740 5,410 9,330 20 14,740 5,410 9,330 21 14,740 5,410 9,330 22 14,740 5,410 9,330 23 14,740 5,410 9,330 24 14,740 5,410 9,330 25 14,740 5,410 9,330 Total $327,800 $135,250 $192,550 Average $ 13,110 $ 5,410 $ 7,700 R 3 ectfglly sub tted, i DJF:b Jackson Foustmen 'i=a �+i is dklf MIL) tti� IJIBSVdTiIt 'R 'f •Lanai oanol ,_ � 1, •Lpooa oar Aryl to uooa o+ 1aTa loiq +ga u1y1Tw uaawo 4aadoad oy1 to i+it +ga not Pool Iliw I •odsiW +S^1 aoS to Ljj5 +y1 jo i __- 1ataloTQ VaTgsod BaTpaoBoa P+1o+16oa nob aoSioeaajuT oyl oT paga*IIV :ITS load Oluaoiii+0 'od+IgO Sir" uaS 10041S 81409TR 614 au4444a l LasoR -xw S961 '9L taonagod PARKING DISTRICT 110. 1 1. See sap attached aboeing boundaries of district. 2. Parkiag District revenue& for the fiscal year 1963/64 Lot 1 $5.744.34 _ Lot 2 4.456.93 �( Lot 3 4,992.69 Lot 4 1.481.75 Lot 5 1,210.14 Lot 6 9,732.70 Lot 7 1.058.00 Lot 8 600.00 Lot 9 94.00 Street 39.411.7 $68,11 .21 Bonk Interest 1,063.57 $69,647.82 Total Rsvense $69,847.92 3. Parking District expenses for the fiscal year 1963/64 _:J d *Maintenance and operation $24,005.76 bond Principal and Interest 21 115.00 $51,120.76 Total Revenue $31,120.76 *Includes enforcement. Transferred to off-street parkin8 reserve $18,727.06 4. Number of parking estate in Parkla{ District No. 1 Street 601 Lot 1 123 Lot 2 75 Lot 3 58 Lot 4 69 Lot S 39 Lot 6 90 Total Haters 1.056 S. List of property owners by street address in Perking District. S � PARCELS IN PARKING DISTRICT N0. 1 - an of 2/1/65 2-322-01 2-421-06 24423-07 2-42446 2-322-02 2-421-07 11-423-09 2-424-18 2-322-05 2-421-09 2-423-09 2-424-19 2-322-U 2-421-10 2-423-12 2-424-21 2-322-13 2-421-U 2-LL23-13 2-42445 2-322-15 2.421-12 2.423-14 2-424-26 2-415-04 2-421-13 2-423-15 2-04-27 2.415.M 9-421-14 2-423-16 24&&-28 2.415-14 2-421-16 2-423-17 2-424-29 2-423-19 2-416-01 2-421-17 2-423-20 2-424-30 2-416-02 24422-01 2-423-21 2-425-01 2-416-03 2-422-02 2-423-22 2-425-02 2-416-06 2-422-03 2-423-23 2-425-04 2-$16-07 2-422-04 2-423-26 2-425-05 24416-08 2-422-05 2-423-27 2-425-06 2-416-09 2-422-06 2-423-28 2-425-09 2-416-10 2-422-07 2-423-34 2-425-10 2-416-U 2-422-06 2-423-35 2-425-U 24,16-18 2-422-09 2-423-36 2-425-15 24416-20 (2 )v ars) 24422-11 2-423-37 2-425-16 24416-21 2-02-12 24424-01 2-425-17 24416-22 2-L22-13 2.42L-02 2.425-10 2.416-23 24422-15 24424-03 2.426-01 2-416-25 2-422-16 2-424-0b 2-426-M 2-416-26 2-422-17 2-424-09 2-426-03 24416-27 2-422-18 2-424-10 2-46-M 2-416-26 2-423-03 2-L4,12 2,426-05 r 2-426-o6 2-434-03 24143-18 3-527-21 2-426-07 24434-04 2iEXUM 2-426-W 24434-07 3-523-01 2-426-09 24435-02 3-523-M 2-426-10 2-435-03 3.523-03 2-426-11 2-435-04 3-523-07 240-12 24435-05 3-523-W 2-426-14 2-435-Li" 3-523-09 2-426-15 2-435-07 3-523-11 2-427-01 2-435-o8 3-525-01 2.427-02 2-435-09 3-525-02 2-427-03 2-435-io 3-525-05 2-427-04 2-441-06 3-525-05 2-427-05 2-441-11 3-525-12 2-427-D9 2-441-13 3-525-12 24427-12 0-441-A 3-526-01 2-431-01 2-443-01 3-526-02 2-431-02 2-443-05 3-526-03 2.431-03 2-443-06 3-526-04 2.431-04 2-443-07 3-526-05 2-432-01 2.443-0 3-526-06 2-432-02 2-443-09 3-526-07 2.432-05 2-443-10 3-526-W 2-432-06 2-443-11 3-526-09 2-432-09 2-443-12 3-526-10 2-432-10 2.443-14 3-526-U 2-433-M 2.443-15 3-527-06 2-434-01 2-443-16 3-527-07 2-434-M 2-"3-17 3-527-19 • Mr. Richard D. Miller City Administrative Officer 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mr. Miller: Pursuant to your request, the City of San Luis Obispo is hereby granted permission and consent to enter upon and demolish those portions of any structures located on our land adjoining the City parking lot. Said property and structures being located on Chorro Street, formerly owned by Airs. Pezzoni. It is understood that the City will prepare the plans and specifications, award the demolition of the said structures to the lowest bidder and supervise the demolition at City expense. We agree to pay to the City 34% of the cost of demolishing the structures located partially on our property and partially on the City's property. Said amount is to be deposited by us with the City upon the award of the demolition contract. Very truly yours, L & R INVESTMENT COMPANY, A General Partnership C. C. HUMPEM V N. A. LANDECK September 12, 1961 Mr. C. C. Humphrey Alloy's Department Store Re: Pezzoui Parking Lot 1144 Chorro Street San Luis Obispo, C-Alifornia Dear Mr. &saphroy: The City of San Luis Obispo has prepared plans and specifications for the demolition of the Peztani residence and other structures on the City'* parking lot. As shown on the attached sketch, 34.47% of the house and adjoining structures are located on your 35' x 100' parcel. In order to demolish the structures, ve will need authorization by you, as owner of the property, to remove said structures. Legally, the City of Soo Luis Obispo could not expand public monies to improve your property. Therefore, we would like to suggest that the City, at its own "came, prepare plans and specifications, awned the demolition to the lowest bidder, and supervise the demolition. This procodare would require an agreement by you to pay 34% of the Cost of the demolition of these two structures. Our plane and speci- fictions are set up to that each bidder must state separate bid prices on these structures in order that ve may determine the cost involved. If you are in agreement with the above, kindly forward a letter to the City giving us the necessary consent and agreement to deposit your share of the cost upon the award of the bid. Thsroafter, the City will super. vise and pay the contractors directly. If there are ray questions regarding the above, please call ma at Llborty, 3.8666. Very truly yours, William M. Houser. Jr. City Attorney WMHfkd cc: Administrative Officer City Engineer 1012 oca It . 0 Celllernla toll Lill. Fee $ 638.00 uanbm Ives POLICY OFTITLE ITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY Title Insurance and Trust Company, a corporation, of Los Angeles, California, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration paid for this policy, the number, the effective date, and amount of which are shown in Schedule A, hereby insures the parties named as Insured in Schedule A, the heirs, devisees, personal representatives of loch Insured, or if a corporation, its successors by dissolution, merger or consolidation, against loss or damage not exceeding the amount stated in Schedule A, together with costs, artomeys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay as provided in the Conditions and Stipulations hereof, which the Insured shall sustain by reason of 1. Aay defect in or lien or racumbnoxe on the side in the estate or interest covered hereby in the land deunbed re referred to in Schedule C, eairting st the darn hereoL our shown or rlfen d to in Schedule B or excluded from covmge in Schedule B or in the Conditions and Stipulations; or 3. Varoarkenhility of such title; at 3. Any defect in the exeausion of any niorrgege shown in Schedule B securing an itidrbledri the owner of whith is named as in Insured in Schedule A, her only insofar as such. defect dfror the lien or charge of said mortgage upon the estate at in¢rest referred to in this polity; or 4. Prioriry over sod mongage, at the dare hereof, of any lien or entnmbrance nor sbawn or refemd to in Sthed,sle B, or excluded from coverage in the Conditions and Snpubuioru, .said mortgage being shown in Schedule B in the order of its priority; all subject, however, to the Conditi0it si%4 Stipulations hereto annexed, which Conditions and Stipulations, to. gether with Schedules A, B and C are hereby made a part of this policy. In IY;wes, ly hrreol, Title tolerance and Trust Company has caused its corporate name and Read to be here - men affixed by its duly authorised officers on the date shown in Schedule A. TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY byPRESIDENT Arrest ASSISTANT SECRETARY 65848-LL • 0 rm acts t.1 na..N <o...a.. 1e1- rare caa.„0111C1 SCHEDULE A Effective September 12, 1961 Amrruot g 187,000.00 Date at 7:30 a.m. Policy No.65848 I N s U a ED CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 1. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal corporation. 2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule C covered by this policy is a fee. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: PART I 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown es existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assoonoonu on real property or by the public records. 2. Any fart, righm interests, or darn, which on,nt shown by the public records but hich could be ascertained by on aela'rtion of said lend or by ranking inquiry of person, in twsxcsion thereof. 3. Easements, donia of easamero or encumbrances which are not show-n by the pubGa rwnrds. 4. Discrepancies, amllicts in boundan liner, shortage i area, encroachments. encroachments. or any other facts which o correct survey would diyloae, and which are not shown by tho public roro,d, o Unpatented mining ]air..; r wnations or cx ueptiom in pin of Act, authorizing the rs.okii th,vofa wmor rights, 1.1... or title to wator. 65848-LL • -- --- _ - __ • ionp c.m. p.m anbm,p ,e.a nn. ww.�m i.. „b C19 eiap. Va11n ie.m SCHEDULE B—(Continued) PMT II L. An agreement relating to a party wall on the North- easterly line of Parcel 2, extending 110 feet from Monterey Street Southeasterly and at right angles with Monterey Street, executed by Mary J. Lowe and H. H. Carpenter, dated June 27, 1918, recorded June 28, 1918, in Book 121, page 476 of Official Records. 2. An agreement relating to a party wall on the North- easterly line of Parcel 2, executed by Olive B. Martin and W. B. Martin, her husband and Irene J. Carpenter, dated January 15, 1931, recorded February 27, 1931, in Book 105, page 435 of Official Records, said wall extending 20 feet from the Southeasterly end of 110 foot party wall described and agreed upon between Mary J. Lowe and H. H. Carpenter by instrument dated June 27, 1918, recorded June 28, 1918, in Book 121, page 476 of Deeds and being continuation of and in same course as said 110 foot wall and being at right angles with Monterey Street. • • 65848-LL lal ac-lasx coo -el M.rlmn nrl. /u.xi.rmn me. va mr ba111en o1 Cor.r.p.._0trebar. 19a0 QlnI.lia?nl.a.SCHEDULE C sm,d-d co.,oa. r.11a-1961 The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: PARCEL 1: That portion of Block 17 in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, :,tate of California, according to the map thereof recorded May 1, 1878, in Bock A, page 168 of Maps in the office of the county recorder of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Southeasterly line of Monterey Street with the Southwesterly line of Osos Street as conveyed to the City of San Luis Obispo by deed dated July 23, 1877 and recorded September 14, 1877 in Book J, page 186 of Deeds; thence along the Southwesterly line of said Cans Street South 36° 10' East 129 feet 5 inches to the most Easterly corner of the land conveyed to Olive B. Martin by deed dated July 30, 1928, recorded July 30, 1928, in Book 54, page 103 of Deeds, the true point of beginning; thence along the Southeasterly line of said land conveyed to Olive B. Martin, South 54' 06' West 60 feet 7 inches to the Northeasterly line of the land conveyed to Ysabel Pico and Virginia Pico by deed dated August 7, 1871, recorded August 29, 1871, in Book C, page 409 of Deeds; thence South- easterly along the Northeasterly line of the land conveyed by said last mentioned deed to the Northwesterly line of Higuera Street as conveyed to the City of San Luis Obispo by deed dated October 9, 1889, recorded January 11, 1890, in Book 7, page 5 of Deeds; thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Higuera Street to the Southwesterly line of Osos Street aforementioned; thence Northwesterly along the said Southwesterly line of Osos Street to the true point of beginning. PARCEL 2: That portion of Block 17 in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, according to the map thereof recorded May 1, 1878 in Book A, page 168 of Maps in the office of the county recorder of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Southeasterly line of Monterey Street with the Northeasterly line of Court Street as widened by deed to the City of San Luis Obispo, dated June 4, 1877, recorded October 11, 1877, in Book J, page 232 of Official Records; thence Northeasterly along the South- easterly line of Monterey Street, 72.55 feet more or less to the most Westerly corner of the land conveyed to D. W. James • by deed dated August 17, 1891, recorded August 29, 1871, in 65848-LL • .Book C, page 413 of Official Records; thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said land to the North- westerly line of Higuera Street as conveyed to the City of San Luis Obispo by deed dated October 9, 1889, recorded January 11, 1890, in Book 7, page 5, of Deeds; thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line of Higuera Street, 72 feet more or less to the Northeasterly line of Court Street aforementioned; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of Court Street as widened to the point of beginning. 101 aD o-el CAL I FOgNIa LAND TITLE ad40CIATICN STANDARD COVERAGE PoIICY "M CORYRtGNi 1161 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (lndodes Those in the American Title Associonoo-Duels Patry-Smndord Form B-1960) 1. DEFINITION OF TEEMS The following terms when used in this polity mean: (a) "land'^. The land described, specific- ally m by reference, in Schedule C and improvemmm of .ad thereto which by law eonstimte real property; (b) "public records": those records which Impm mns„uetive nastice, d marten refining to said lard; (c) "knwlici actual knowledge, not commiurxive knowledge or noaice which may be imputed to rile Insured by mean of Any public retards; (d) "date": the effective data; (a) "mortgage": mortgage, dead of trust, tnu, deed, or .,be, security I.,m- ment; and (f) 'mossimi The party or parties beams designated m Insured, and if the owes. of the indebtedness seemed by a mortgage shown in Schedule B is named as aD Limited in Schedule A. The Insured shall include (1) each Increaser in interest in ownership of such indebtedness, (2) an, such owner who note es the ntata or in - hat referred in in this policy by fora closure, wstee's sale, or other legal mm- sa in icuir ite Tan of said indebeednns, and (3) any fdtod agency or imtmmentality, which is m insurer mf guarantor under an insurance contract or guaranty insuring or Murmteeing said indebadnns, or any pen thereof, whether ..d as an insured heceics a no,. 1. BENEFITS Ali ACOUISn1ON OF TnIB if an inured owner of the indeb,chum socured by a fnartgii, denriMd in Sched- We B adquirn said treat or interest, m my put thereof, by foreclosure trounces', sale, M other too name, in satisfaction of said iml6madene. Tar any Part thereof, or if a federal agency gcy or inummrnnlity ¢quires Mid estate or interest, o, an, Pen therenf, as . consegumce of an hemi contract of guaranty in.ndring or ganco eeing the in, debredons secured by a mortgage covered by this policy, he any Part thereof, this Policy shall continue in force in favor of rush Insured, at., or instrumentality, subject to all of the condition, and mifedi tioa hared. 1. EXCLUSIONS MOM THE COVMGE OF THIS FOLIC,r This pri does nor insure against loll u dotage by T.a.. of the following: (a) Any law, radiance are gioemmmul regulation (including but not limited to building and aming ardinmces) rnrricting or seguhnng oe prombiam, The occupli tax or enluy'mmt of the land, as regulating the dande,. dimeniws, or location of any imprmemet,, now m hereafter erected on said land. ,, prohibiting A s-pa 6. in 9vmenhlp or a reduction in the d!arreorloa or ace s. any Ira or petrel of IaM. (b) Governmencd rights of politic power m em. domsin B ke mtlm of judicial .,,I can To eserdse such righm ap. peon in the public rnosd at the data beef. (r) Title to any no,ars, beytmd the Lima of the land tie chord, described in Schedule C, or title to strew , funds. mi nues. Icon, ways n waterways an which such land abut,, ot the right to maintun therein van[U, tannals, ram, or any cthet structure or improvescrear; or arty rights car nsemmN therein odes This polity spa• cfically provides that such property, rights easement, are insured, mtcep, that if the lead chub upon one or more physically open street, or highway, this FIT inures the ordinary rights of aburtini ounces far access to one of such sneers of highways, udeas otherwise excepted or excluded herein. (d) Defects, liras, erscnmbmncim ad. store claims against the tide as insured or other manes (1) tinted, suffered. Amerced a ageed as by the Insured; of (2) known to the Insured either at the data of thus policy or a, the data such Insured acquired an enure or in erne insured by this polity, and ma shown by the public record, unlera disclosure thereof in writing by the Insured shall have been made to the Compmy prior to the date of this policy; or (3) resulting in an loss as the Insured; or (4) atructimig or created dater vent to the date hereof. (a) Loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured went a purchaser or encumbrancer for value with- out knowledge. 4. DEFENSE AND FEOSECUTION OF ACTIONS --NOTICE OF CIAIM TO BE GIVEN BY THE INSURED (a) The Company, at ill we can and without undue delay shell provide (1) for the defense of the Insured in all litigation consisting of actions of pfoceedings com- freard again the Insured, or defenses r stra!Wng onders, car injunction, inerposd igainu a foreclosure or .It of dhe indehtd- n„ sasomd by a enter ge covered by this policy or a .It of the estate of interest in said land; ce (2) for such anion as may be appropriate to establish the title of the rude or interest or the lien of the mort- gage m banned which litigation ar ". in any of such events is founded upm As alleged defect lien or auumbrmce insured agdnn by this policy, and ma➢ panne my litigation to find! determination in the court of last an". 1 In not arty such anion of proceed- ing dull be begun, or defense interposed or in case knowledge shall come to the In - varied of my dam of title or intent which is adverse To the title of die esure or intto,t or lien of the mortgage u insured, un which might came loll of damage for which the Company shall or my be liable by virtue of this yn iry, or if the Insured shall in good faith connan To sell she malthtedom In, rated by a mortgage emitted by this policy, or, if an Insured in goad fetch Into, or emOanm I. sell, lease or mortgage the same, or if the was rful bidder a, a fored. sale under a mortgage covered by this polity refuses to purchase and in any such evens the tide to said estate or interest is selected as urunarkerable, the Insured shall suorify the Company thereof in writing. If suds raotia shall men, be given to the Company within ren days of the raeipt of process or Flood- ings or if the Insured shall not, W writing promptly notify the Company of my defect, lien or rnrmrbrTi insured .,I., which ,hall roma to the knowledge of The Insured, or if the Insured shall nnr, in writing promptly notify the Company of my such rejection by reason of claimed unmahn- dsility of Lida, then all liability of the Coto pan, in regard to the subject matter of such action, proceeding or meter shall cease and tarmimte; provided, however, chat failure to Terrify shall in no we prejudice the claim of my Insured them the Compmy shill be actually prejudiced by such failure and then only to the extra, of such Prejudice. (c) The Compmy shall have the right In, its own cost in institute and prosecute my action of proceeding or do any other . which in its opinion may be inconstancy or desirable to establish the title of the ntata or interest or the lien of do, mosy;Age as toured; and ,he CenWoy any calf, Barry appropriate I. under the Term, of Thus polity rvhtohn or not it shall be liable them under and shall not thereby concede liability or waive my pm r aim of this polity. (d) In all scan where this policy, per- mits of nalairn the Compmy as possemta or provide far the defense of say union a proceeding, the Insured shall $.,a a it the right co se prosecute or provide defense in such Beaton or Proceeding, and all appeea therein, and peso, it muse, at its optioq the come of the Insured for such puryune, Wbenever «yu,ted by the Compmy the Insured shall give the Company all mist- mne in AT such raioe he proceeding, in effecting seiiement. securing evidence all. raining wimnsn, or pcosemting or defend- ing such anfm or proceeding, end the Cow pony shall combat. The Insured for any calamine so incanted. S. NOTICE OF LOSS — UMfTAT OF ACTION In addition he the nothea required under pmagraph 4(b), A statement in writing Of An, loss of damage for which it is claimed ,he Company is liable under This polity ,hall be finished to the Company within simy days after such lass or damage shall base been determined and no right of attion .,hall acceue to The Insured coder this policy, tail Thirty days sifter such statement shall have been furnished and no recovery shall he had by the Insured udder This poliy unless anion shall be curnmersi ,hereon within fire years after expiration of said Thirty day penned. Failure a furnish such Internet, of loss of dotage, or to C. ah ,von within the Title herein - before specified, ,bell be a enndnsive bar against aaintmmce by The Insured of aD, action under this policy. (CmIarend and Cmtdid.d on Rovatas Sid.) A. H. BRAZIL ATTORNEY AT LAW 6Aw Odra �. LIFO" Sn6UL5_OnISPO, GlN60gNin SAW September 19, 1961 y S1 S 0� RE: Encroachment for improve- ment of party wall The City Council City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California Attention: Mr, Richard D. Miller, City Administrator Gentlemen: The letter of Mr. Houser, City Attorney, dated September 13 written at the request of the City Council and addressed to Mr, Henry C. Dalessi, has been delivered to the undersigned for reply. We feel that the 4 inches now stated to be an encroachment on the City parking lot should be deeded to Mr. Dalessi so that no question of title and the need for up -keep of the wall can ever be raised by Mr. Dalessi. If you wanted a provision that upon the removal or demolition of the wall that the 4-inch encroachment would be deeded back to the City, Mr, Dalessi would have no objection. Personally, I can see no wisdom in such a proceeding, Mr. Dalessi will proceed to strengthen the wall in the manner and form prescribed by the Engineering Department of the City of San Luis Obispo, and in accord with proper engineering and building practices, The City shall, of course, have available to its proper officers at all times a full inspection of the construction as it proceeds. We feel the requirement, with reference to hanging or painting signs or advertisements, is unnecessary. Naturally, if a sign or advertisement was desired to be placed on the wall by Mr. Dalessi, he could not do so without making an application to the City of San Luis Obispo. We feel that such an understanding of t. The City Council Attention: Richard D. Miller Page No. 2 September 19, 1961 and agreement would enable the City Council to control this practice without arbitrarily eliminating Mr. Dalessi's right. We feel that we cannot sign a waiver concerning the costs of improvement of the repairs to the wall. I have discussed this matter at some length with Mr. Houser. We do not, at this time, have any idea as to whether or not the City would be liable for any or all of the costs as the result of the des- truction of the Carpenter Building, which was a part or attached to the party wall. I£ there is a right, Mr. Dalessi should not be required to eliminate that as a condition to the improve- ment. Rest assured that this matter will be fully discussed with the Council and I am certain that the matter can be fully carried out and adjusted without any difficulty. I have advised Mr. Dalessi to the extent that the wall was open and not attached or a part of the building torn down, and would be little or no likelihood of any claim being made against tbe. City for a reimbursement for a portion of these costs. It is my opinion that the only contest would involve the front portion of the wall. Mr. Dalessi will proceed as soon as directed and will sign an agreement in conformity with these suggestions or one agreed upon at a conference between the parties. AHB/ds cc: Mr. William M. Houser, Jr. Mr. Richard F. Harris Mr. Henry C. Dalessi Very t ly ours, �. f <Y 1Z' X. H. BRAZIL - r 0 a, tc�_er 13s i rr, ,wwry .. aalaesl +a, + iv vLlsFbs Lail unti a subjects :.nOrwohownt for i.wprevo-ont of party wall :)sa! Kr. baysals ibe Uty CA=U at Its seatin, of imp:tesber 5s 1961, authorised an encroach - meet into the City earkinc Lot of not to exceed four (4) inches: for the �rr.we o` LyravIne the southwesterly "all of Us Ltilspo Thvstrr .wilding located at 993 ttonterey Are", .:en Luis ubimgeos Califorrlas r. tto fullwimg tends and Conditions: L .aid encrowtoont right shall cease upon Ume t1Wa0A1 or demolition of saki W&U. 2. .t,e �lty Oha11 not be durptd for any coats of Luyrove-nacts or reimin W amid hall. ). Tou atM<O t•, nold thug C1ty harmless fro Ary or all 11aLil1ty ce property da.,w& reaultIeg from Vm lwprowxits and rwpairs to Mai wall; tnat us anmeschment is ll,ited to ccnatruction and swyrir of said wall and does not lioluds VA rii;tt to hang er pant &L4 ak%s or edeeALeOmet,ta Uweroa,. siudly indicate acceptance and a; royal t:, t-:n aforwomAioned sooditicaws :�/ sxrc4txc.- a,., n,tj-n nm', t;.. on^lral of t; !.N lottor W the CLty Clark. ,!a C: rlor. eC. c !W your ides. 'or; ;Spy Y^ -.:as Accepted and approved this day of ..erta imr. 1961. : ity - t7.>rne; I N Mr. Richard D. Miller City Administrative Officer M Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mr. Miller. Pursuant to your re"at, the City of San Luis Obispo is hereby granted petmisaion and consent to enter upon and demolish those portions of any structures located on our land adjoining the City parking lot. Said property and structures being located on Gborro Street, formerly owned by Mrs. Peasoni. It is understood that tba City will prepare the plane and specifications, award the demolition of the said structures to the lowest bidder and supervise the demolition at City expense. O We agree to pry to the City 34% of the cost of demolishing the structures located partially m our property and partially on the City's property. Said amount is to be deposited by us with the City upon the award of the demolition contract. Very truly yours, II 11 L 6 H INVESTMEMI COMPANY, A General �L�JI Partnership sy, C. C. auemm IL A. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY ]qqJ SNONIE BOULEvnFp SKOK I E. ILL IN O IS August 8, 1961 Mayor City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo, California Dear Sir: For some time we have been purchasers of selected state and municipal bonds. We thought it would interest you to know that we have recently pur- chased: $135,000 City of San Luis Obispo (San Luis Obispo County), California, Parking District Bo, 1, Series A Bonds (dated 1-1-61) When you are in Chicago, we hope that you will find time to visit us. Very truly yours, TA-alk LO. " u4 Richani C. Lonergan Investment Manager RCL: nun 6 i �i 11 2 I! 31 11 411 5 6' 7' 9 10 11' 12 13 14 j 15� 16 17 18 19 20 II 21 i! 22 23 24 25 26 27 C� AGREEMENT TERMINATING LASE The undersigned hereby agrees to vacate the office premises located in the Carpenter Building on Monterey Street, in the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on or before July 1, 1961. The undersigned further waives notice of termination. Hugh ;0Bonnell ��' CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY • OF PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1961 EAIdM id ENEET !WN M. IMl Twot Amm"Ptbn>nd Impiun0ruvemMt Progely bM ASSETS 1.Funde Amoold Attount iu[urlo RerOurmm,rh W u, Allmated from Perbq Revenue ] I....f 12.i41 R9 ] I.US.iB ld PorADond hlnelgl (rlwdule t A-f fYl,Orlm i ISo.IS For ProofInterest end Redemption P—mm ,I.. A—. P, MI &'nedulx A-v V-%SS 3611-IL0 ].1 a, to V"..15 ,,.ri 31,121=fb S'Ie154 ] 1.,14,76 F f8v.l'-U L."t B8.ffi PVND AND ACCOUNT MLANOE( T. EFood Shoolmod, omd ISYYY Nae ArcWiM1lon Mod Impravemenl Fund I—o-ot Ln Fiaed Amim, Prig :i :.ea m<erext To,.. STATEMENT OF REVENUE For INS lumod Vur (hide JYM W. IMI Podded Nef Pari Melee R.—mr; a— Neeenuea—On-Smood W.mr Dufour c utd �pl rd.w. No. I62 Mlarlu PWroil Coeb N.N 1,1a and Eupplim LYPRM WJar plihim " F :tins Mmer Revenue mot Wu1ry A 1 3 R IfI SP { 1]:i1. SA Hrnedulr A-1 to"A `U4i &'',:dole A:] 136. An I6 { IN.1ST6 M',rdm: A-, ea1.:Sun SS AKERESE {lln.-III .gd Ltill Sfl ]1f B](IB S� ANAIACQU$S'TION NnEMEINT FUND FOR I.. MARCN1. IMP did, R lt=d. nl ... I-V. A P:emlum ,i, f In VE. L. Rruouumenl for Rewree. VERELW {1.111.m EKP6.VDITL'R�le far Eapa'.ntlllurc SID4.bRM 1. did PoY,rYAD Lot ffile ArauNluoN 1 R1191.M IIS. Ft R1re IBi OW m { 3fi, ud a 1_I1 I,iti.tl ImpMv .1. RIrld-from Off -Street RhM(N x" IXM Lot ot I f I.SI:t.IS I MO.M i I.IF H Hf.W N N 72 I ItLL i2j. Total 1 t.yK.1I 1 m8.00 TIRE R.. V, M AUSN.Nd fluou...... d. lees. f I.6m. . -Sitt A { man 1 IP ]1I.M Stliv.1e A 112.6l L.&S, _ Inla[al •�$Yrtwe TWI 1 L`Eel Advnrtl.enwnl Taata Inlereel ..it Rrcordl. I5Dm Utt'. 'IY.M S UPS, Tmr- Tebpeone and Olner UN I.III.IS ",..I St to LZo.numlrylaml Dona R.ISRS 12111 LyN vie cunw lmy( S 1.mI62 DnBinwrl S Deport Plnenrin! Regrrt XPREM, 6 - I2 6.:IH.IP ]•1AOO (myvltuulon Prinlrn] ". IIfL. ]1.11RD1 Tole, Xmu—Umrre Si La—lual Uajahv OPINION PUMlxnnd In oecaraMre with the pryvlaloM of Rivauflan No, FES 11 wr m or me .r nnlgnrms Ba1Mc: 61.e4 a xm w 6ute. a%1 Derlen ( Aermue.. ure[her un avp^rlme rvaule.. p m ml.lr l.r R FIrLPwrR[CK our, e t'hum m vn.mm ul me Pnrho, ➢Mules vo. 1 PIOIr'e, u Iunn atY Clerl 10. If61 m nemt. of me ynuxM m:mrt 'or ne nMa e then bet In .rMldanre with o. oro.mM of Rewlutioo No. Pd]. ,'Y o1 drtallea ..11. rovnrin` ArLInE DI.F., ". I MWOIu Ve Trvly Youn n file ne OIUm of the CYIy Cleek d Y4lle IV N- WI FOPO [.EVx4 A SUFANY Nor"... CerRRea 11e14 Aerwn<.nl: Outlier M SAN LUIS MI" MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT No SMvv •l mm lP.flo'1.D/vr"""o. »D IodtSuomi wi p,r, ""). M, NN Y.vs arr"Wo.kfor, re:_ • { M...d,, -, enll v) e~w *o"Ab om" ur n knS wJr e/ rM ja.e]ovN vAra ree ImMNd ke+o).o.I,, n, p11.r. L re. xu.r. our, ] . r.eep(rarrn] uA! k.e.1..: . rve hLn od Pnvrrin of !w A r } O"orteb...u! mnn.vnre ofSir .. pm y.o].e 0 RRIRK ORRICK, DAHLOUIST. HERRINGTON S SUTCLIFFE COUNSELORS AND ATTORNEYS AT LAW IOS MOHTGOMEPY SiREEi TELEPHONE E%BROOK 21120 ox SAN FRANa SCO 4.CALIFORNIA CAB LE AooPE99 "ORRIC N" June 13, 1961 Mr. William M. Houser, Jr, City Attorney City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Re: City of San Luis Obispo - Parking District No. 1 Dear Mr, Houser: We have for acknowledgement your letter of June 8, 1961 enclosing City Warrant in the amount of $1,700 in payment for services in connection with the above proceedings. We understand your position and wish to thank you and the Council for your consideration of the problem. Very truly yours, 796, RL Pit; FD c,0, C'Ac. CITY O cl" Aflolow <xtIait�ft""Am" 6 a" "amowm" " Lim cif oftevowtv Sim" ion Vvem"S" 4. c4aLlovelo AC"MWAMWJ at. RAIWA A. N14464it ore as w" odq% porkoft stoost4iot J &t YA" sot4ftlls &.64"Md "M will 1"d * "ItlplNgt I& dw an"" 40 sie,illaN. mot '"towlifts sbe futs WA ow ftei"W" aeraaea"U" Note !"ll me Get" f-40, I vere. to tkA C�lwuft gut *A ft" "w" "A "W= a- p" ]POW *,,# wom"ift it "4*** at $1,10011ta0. "00" bw me llw4awoo walth 04 be t-40" is ""so of mtr comm"s &A A" 04114 460 am I sass as to" Wow* I hofthm bledow the Oft tb" *saw M Too the ob4A m1w tot *"-WLV" 0006"" 02 00 OWW" fmwm and obw COW"&% d l*" ate o at on0.40 Waatd be retagtils for xs" am*"*, F'oss t-11 wAkil d1foult" w to WU* OAS I*UA" WA it rat 1*14 ft" or la"Aw * umol wa". ft VOWW 0* Istom m and I WMAW "off*** No watts 60ta e,W. 144tcA$1V dW 4"#SUM to be*" as the fort "" w "w*r totro6ott, t4w «a"rso* f" want aft"I Pwf*"Wd red fte go" th" 04to bad booms 041110"A W S"V"WAN4 Oft %JID WPjfjW4 atlwesstt. " hwwam ""Oft to M oriata" I . is b"m "we# 0 orals Ma "Wit rMoMM006 = 4 tept"I'dt* am gAmommas rw "m ow tiro so 4w owalmiam. V«wry trait vremtv*' Lora IL oft"&* Jr. Aftfw" Msy 24. 1961 Orrick, Dahlquist. Herrington 6 Sutcliffe 403 Msatpmry Street San Francisco 4, California Attn: Mr. Edward E. Mitchell 0 Gentlemen: According to your instructions. I an enclosing the following documents for larking District No. 1 Bonds of the City of San Luis Obispo, Series A: 1. City Treasurer Certificate of Deposit in Parking D District No. 1 Bond Service Fund and Reserve Fund. 2. Signature and non -litigation certificate. 3. City Treasurer receipt for purchase price of bonds. P1048e sand a copy of the final legal opinion to the Security First National Bank of Ins Angeles, P. 0. Box 2097, Terminal Amuse, Ins Angeles 54. in care of Mr. F. R. Goodman. Seapectfully. J. H. FITZPATRICK City Clerk JHyonls Rna : May 2. 196L Orrick, Dehlquist. Herrington & Sutcliffe +05 Montgomery gtratt - lath Floor San Francisco 4. California Attent.on: Edward E. Mitchell RE: SAN LDIa OBISPO PLWI C OIbT&IC1 NO. 1 k3. Bear Mr. Mitchell: In reply to your letter of April 10, 1961, yen will find enclasod the follovisgt A. Parking Lot "W' L.:tter lram the City !?ngineor that the parcels era identical. 2. N.s+araadum fray the City Engineer re�atding the party v*11 agreements. B. Parking Lot J. 'Title Policy No. 64354 had No. 64353 covering Percale No. and No. 3. 2. Copy of complaint r,lative to Parcal NO. +. 3. Copy of option as to remainder interest; in Parcel No. 1 Coacther with letter agraeumat dated April 26. 1961, aekaowl"dghig that tee City me complied with the conditions of the option. 4. The lease referred to in Gcoptfon 3 of Title Polity No. W57 gas Sean terminated for war ono year by the Telepbone Company and +'ill not create any problem. 5. The Bead of Trust mentioned is Eusption 4 is to sscura the slance due for the purchase of the remainder Interest and will be paid in full ay ,straw when the City dsposlts its purchase price for the remainder interest- C. Municipal Lots 1, 2. and 3 1. Parking Lot No. 1 (4 Parcels) (1) Policy No. 33736 (1) Policy No. 33196 (3) Policy No. 34476 (4) Policy No. 33676 9ateds September 1. 1950 Dot d4 sp„t Ober 5. 1950 Datvds Wcowbsr 29, 1950 Dat ns 1,u3u5t 14, 1950 Orrick, Dahlquist, Herrington & Sutcliffe May 2, 1961 Page 2 2. Parking Lot No. 2 (5 Parcels) a.) All five (5) parcels covered in Title Insurance and Trust Company Policy No. 53844 dated August 25, 1"5. 3. Parking Lot No. 3 (1 Parcel) a.) Security Titla Insurance Company Policy No. 50653 dated November 12, 1957. As evidenced by the title policies, the City has good title to these parking lots. In reply to 8-2 & 3, the City has settled the pending condmnation suit with the owner of the life estate. An interlocutory Judgment will be filed Nhich will pro- vide tiiac the City will take title to Mrs. Pezzoni's life estate, and that Mrs. Peazanf will retain possession until September 1. 1961. Your letter dated Hap I. 1%1, contained a statement for eer►ieev r=.A-14 ♦., e1- amount of $4.200.00. Our Parking District Pilo contains a letter dated July 40. 1957,.addressed to Kithard D. Miller and signed by George Herrington stating that the legal fens would not ,xeeed $1.000.00, that the total :sathorized issue vould not exceed )350,000.00. I son unable to find any modification or supplement to this agre;�ment end though the bond issue to in the amount of $420,000.00, I ase:%sae that the additional $70,000.00 is not the basis for the $3.200.W increase in rho fees. gladly explain this matter. Very truly yours, William M. Houser, Jr. City Attorney wMa'son Enclosures: (7) • 0 ORRICK. DAMLOUIST. HERRINOTON & SUTCLIFFE COVN34OR3... /STORNCYS AT LA,N tt.c..o�c EAuoa. z uzo AOS MOMiGOM[FY SiPE Ei _ CM UeIi A.....3 "ORRICK SAN FRANCISCO O.GLIFOPNIA April ^17, 1961 Council of the City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County, California Dear Sirs: We hereby certify that we have examined a certified copy of the record of the proceedings relative to the issue of $420,000 principal amount of serial bonds of Parking District No. 1 of the City of San Luis Obispo, Series A. Our final opinion In the form attached will be issued upon submission of: (1) City Treasurer's Certificate of Deposits in Parking District No. 1 Bond Service Fund and Reserve Fund; (2) the usual signature and no -litigation certifi- cate; (3) City Treasurer's receipt for the purchase price of said bonds; and (4) one executed bond for inspection. We remain, dear sirs, Faithfully yours, ORRICK, DAHWUIST,HERRINOTON & SUTCLIFFE per ��Loz,.d ORRICK. DANLOUIST, NCRRINGTON S SUTCLIFFE COVNSEIORS .ND ATTO.NE.S AT LAW T[......I E.....2- 1.0 w .OS .0.100...I ST.CCI U.L. AOOn[bb "011111CK" SAN FRANCISCO A. CALIFORNIA D R A F T 1 Council of the City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County, California Dear Sirs: We hereby certify that we have examined a certified copy of the record of the proceedings submitted to us relative to the issuance of $420,000 principal amount of Parking District No, 1 Bonds of the City of San Luis Obispo, Series A (hereinafter called the "Series A Bonds"), issued under and subject to the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of California, Including the Parking District Law of 1951, and under and pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. 753 (1961 Series) adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo (hereinafter called the "City") on March 20 1961, authorizing said Issue (hereinafter referred to as the r'Resolution"). The Series A Bonds are 420 in number, numbered Al to A420, both Inclusive, of the denomination of $1,000 each, and are dated January 1, 1961. The Series A Bonds are numbered, mature, become payable and bear interest as set forth in the following schedule: Bond Numbers (inclusive) Principal Maturity Date Interest (All bearing Prefix "A") Amount July 1 Rate 1 - 10 j 10,000 1962 4-3/4% 11 - 20 10,000 1963 4-3/4% 21 - 30 10,000 1962 4-3/4% 31 - 40 10,000 1965 4-3/4% 41 - 50 10,000 19666776 4-3/4% 61 0 10,000 0, 000 1968 4-3/4% 4-3/4% - 77 71 - 85 15,000 1969 4-3/4% 86 - 100 15,000 1970 4-3/4% 101 - 115 15,000 1971 4-1/4% 116 - 130 15,000 1972 4-1/4% 131 - 145 15,000 1973 4-1/4% 146 - 160 15,000 1974 4-1/4% 161 - 175 15,000 1975 4-1/44 176 - 195 20,000 1976 4-1/4% 196 - 420 225,000 1986 4 % ee • ! ORRICK, DAHLOUIeT, HERRINGTON S SUTCLIFF! COUNSELORS AND ATTORNEYS AT LAW T., V.O.[ EX uoo n F ll[O [vO aa•[ wU Ox .OS NO.TGO.IA1 STREET SAN PR,IINCISCO I. CALIFORNIA CA[.[Ao9R[Sf "O PRICN' r[YR�'t�i .... R [N 1 -2- p x[v t ROBte T[ GFI FM •1f,c1. w .xvw[w OMx [v Oe P[n Said interest at the rates aforesaid is payable semi-annually on January and July 1 of each year commencing July 1, 1961. Both the principal of and interest on the Series A Bonds are payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the office of the Treasurer of the City of San Luis Obispo, in San Luis Obispo, California. Series A Bonds Nos, Al to A195, both inclusive, maturing on or prior to July 1, 1976, are not redeemable prior to their fixed maturity dates. Series A Bonds Nos. A196 to A420, both inclusive,maturing on July 1, 1986, are redeemable, at the option of the City, on July 1, 1966, but not prior thereto, and on any interest payment date thereafter prior to maturity, as a whole or in part, from revenues as defined in the Resolution and on July 1, 1976, but not prior thereto, and on any interest pay- ment date thereafter prior to maturity, as a whole or in part, from funds derived by the City from any source, at the principal amountthereof and accrued interest to date of redemption plus a premium as set forth in Column 3 below, as follows: Column 1 Column 2 Column Bonds redeemed on and prior to or after July 1 July 1 Premium 1966 19695 19�72g 3-1/ 1975 1980 2-1/% 1980 1981 1983 i981 -1� % 1983 Maturity None provided, however, that in case less than all of the outstanding Series A Bonds maturing on July 1, 1986 are called for redemption, they shall be called by lot. The Series A Bonds are authorized to be issued in the form of coupon bonds, registrable only as to both principal and interest, as provided in the Resolution. ., .... �. .. ,. .. ..• .,. ac x asw _ •.nk%d1.. .iia.a ur Jl �a..1 � f ORRICK, DANLOUIST. HERRINGTON S SUTCLIFFE COUNSELORS ANC ATTORNEYS AT L,W TEL[ RRO. E EFSRo0E 3NPO -- - oy SOS MONr u'OMEPV STREET CAOL[ ADDRESS "ORRICK SAN FRANCISCO <. CALIrOPN1A AR4MIE R OI.MCR:fR -3- Interest upon the Series A Bonds, in our opinion, is exempt from all present Federal income taxes and from State of California personal income taxes under existing statutes, regulations and court decisions, and the Series A Bonds are exempt from all California taxes except inheritance, gift and franchise taxes. In our opinion such proceedings show lawful authority for the issuance of the Series A Bonds under the Constitution and laws of the State of California now in force, and the Series A Bonds are valid and legally binding special obliga- tions secured as provided therein and in the Resolution. we are further of the opinion that: (1) The Series A Bonds, together with all other bonds authorized to be issued under the Resolution, and the interest thereon, are payable exclusively from (a) the gross revenues from the operation of off-street parking places in Parking District No. 1 of the City (hereinafter called the "District") conprlsing the "Project," as defined in the Resolution, (b) net on -street parking meter revenues (as defined in the Resolution) derived by the City from on -street parking meters in the District, and (c) limited ad valorem assessments on all taxable real prop- erty in the District, limited as to time to 36 years from the date of the Series A Bonds and as to amount to $.75 per $100 of assessed valuation of taxable real property in the District, as provided in the Resolution. The City Is not obligated to pay the principal of or interest on any of the Series A Bonds except from said sources, and neither the City nor any of its officers may be held otherwise liable for the payment of principal of or interest on the Series A Bonds or any premiums upon the redemption of any thereof. The Series A Bonds are not general obligations or a general indebtedness of the City and are not secured by the taxing power of the City, and the holders of the Series A Bonds cannot compel the exercise of the taxing power of the City, except to the limited extent of said limited ad valorem assessments and then only as provided in the Resolution. The City is obligated to levy and collect such a limited assessment in any year, to the extent to which gross revenues from the operation of said off-street parking places In the District and the net on -street parking meter revenues for the then current fiscal year have been, or are -.:.6iva<ew:d:.viek�:settesis�a.G1La.k.,k;r£tmSw.clPlr!' G 1 ORRICK. DANLOUIaT. HERRINGTON S SUTCLIFFE _ COUNSELORS ..NO ATTORNEYS AT LAW TLL[..... E.....1 21110 pu .0E MONTO .... Y STREET C..[E ADDRESS "ORRICK jAN FMNCIECO A. CALM ORNIA expected to be, insufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Serieo A Bonds and to the extent to which the Reserve Fund established by the Resolution has been or will be used to pay such principal and interest or to call and redeem Bonds in the minimum amounts required to be called and redeemed from the Sinking Fund, as provided in the Resolution, clearly sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Series A Bonds or to rebuild and re-establish said Reserve Fund to the full amount required to be maintained therein. (2) The Resolution provides for the issuance of addi- tional bonds which will rank equally as to security with the Series A Bonds, regardless of the time or times of issuance of such additional bonds, upon the terms and subject to the condi- tions set forth in the Resolution. (3) The City has covenanted in the Resolution to establish and collect on -street parking meter fees for on -street parking meters in the District and fees, rates and other charges for the use of said Project in such amounts that the Revenues as defined in the Resolution (excluding therefrom any limited ad valorem assessments) pledged to pay the principal of and interest on the Series A Bonds will be at least equal to the sum of the follow- ing (each with respect to the then immediately ensuing twelve months): the interest payments for such twelve months on all the outstanding Bonds, the principal amount of all Serial Bonds maturing by their terms during such twelve months, the minimum amount of Term Bonds required to be called and redeemed from the Sinking Fund during such twelve monthe, and the necessary and reasonable maintenance and operation costs of the District parking places, all as defined and provided for in the Resolution. (4) The City has established, as provided in the Resolu- tion, a Parking District No. 1 Reserve Fund to be used solely to pay the principal of and interest on Bonds issued under the Resolution (or any part thereof), or to call and redeem Bonds in the minimum amounts (or any part thereof) required to be called and redeemed from the Sinking Fund, in the event that no other funds of the City are then available therefor. Said Reserve Fund is in the amount of $30,000 and is required to be maintained in that amount so long as any Series A Bonds are �,... a.ml.ti3ntuU s - e�.v. Hyr:,:.u..>•..:..tx,u.mbsw,.dar.urs w..5tma;:�:ie,�lu.I»rsub.:i4�ii ORRICR. DAHLOUIST. HERRINGTON S SUTCLIFFE COUNSELORS AND ATTOPNuS AT LAW 40S MON700MERY STREET SAN FRANCISCO R. CALIIORNIA —5— R,V...[ E...... 2N20 CA[,[AODR[[[ "ORRIC.' outstanding. If any additional bonds are issued under the Resolution, the minimum amount to be maintained in said Reserve Fund shall be the amount then equal to the maximum annual debt .service (as defined in the Resolution) on all Bonds Issued under the Resolution and then outstanding. (5) The resolution and the rights and obligations of the City and of the holders and registered owners of bonds and coupons issued under the Resolution may be modified or amended in the manner and subject to the restrictions and limitations contained in the Resolution. We remain, dear airs, Faithfully yours, ORRICK, DAHLQUIST, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE per .iu�n .e;.Cv.t.A.YA a r . .e'i149inRU ISr[..4u''iuM...,+x46i S:.K> :. Y.�"YNuuaiui I t( WILLIAM M.HOUSEQ,JQ. ATTORNEY AT LA Sall LUIS OIISPO,CALIfokn IP cis• All ORNEr 3 ae es April 26, 1961 L. and H. Investment Co. C/o Riley's Department Store 1144 Chorro Street San Luis Obispo, California Re: Pezzoni Parcel Attention C. C. Humphrey Dear Mr. Humphrey: Confirming our verbal discussion of this date, the City of San Luis Obispo, in compliance with that certain AGREEMENT and OPTION dated March 2, 1959, has re- ceived agreement with Mrs. Pezzoni in the condemnation action and a stipulated judgment will be filed. Said judgment will provide, in addition to the amount agreed upon for damages, that Mrs. Pezzoni will be permitted to retain possession of the premises until September 1, 1961. Supplementing said AGREEMENT and OPTION, the L. and H. Investment Co. and the City hereby agree as follows: 1. That the City has complied with the conditions set forth and hereby exercises its option. 2. That the City will acquire Mrs. Pezzonils life e:.tate in accordance with the conditions stated above. 3. That the purchase price set forth in said AGREEMENT and OPTION shall be deposited in a joint escrow on September 1, 1961, or sooner in the event Mrs. Pezzoni's right to possession should be terminated. I would appreciate your execution and return of the original of this supplem- entary agreement at your earliest convenience. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO p By: WILLIAM M. HOUSER, JR. City Attorney April 1 % , 1961 L. AND H. INVESTMENT CO. By: C. C. HUMPHREY cae.[aooa[fa JEBnCO .[aarxoxa ,+no�eon ,-n�i� IIT WINSTON STREET POST OFFICE BOX IS LOS ANOELES 53 April 26, 1961 N21[�2j3j4? h i(1Ir �'- O N11 ` ' V 9 (• J Mr. J. H. Fitzpatrick ip { City Clerk �68t C City Hall San Luis Obispo, Calif. Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick: We have received the approved proof of the bond and coupon back from Orrick, Dahlquist, Herrington & Sutcliffe but they inform us they will send copy for the opinion in due course. After we receive the copy for the opinion it must be set in type and new proofs sent out. We thought you might like to have this information as you might be able to expedite the preparation of the bonds by seeing if Ed Mitchell at Orrick's office couldn't send the opinion immediately. Yours very truly, Lawrence Jeffrie Vice President LLJ::sl Comniereial and Financial Engraving, Printing and Lithographing �y or GONIftL [M1iMAx O �Irr[ P.x a ... �kli:ax [ MV. 'ANE �OI[CIUPo rr M1 JAM [1 I. cMrtt, IN. M1xextW ..E1... RRICK, DANLOU1sT, M[RRINOTON S SUTCLIFFL COUNSCLORONTOONERY STREET ANO ATTORNEYS AT LAW Tt LLnxOMt Et t1100F 2-1120 AO6 M $AN FRANCISCO I.CALIFORNIA G.L[ADOR[5S 'ORRICK" A n�~ Mr. William M. Rouser, Jr. City Attorney City Hall San Luis Obispo, California April 18, 1961 Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. 1 Dear Mr. Houser: We have for acknowledgment your letter of April 17, 1961 and its enclosures and statement of Mr. Miller relative to City advances also Stated April 17 for which we thank you both. I would be obliged if you would kindly supply me with the rollowing for our file$: A. Re: Parking Lot D ,1 1. Certificate or letter from the title company that the two parcels described in Policy No. 65848 (and in Exhibits A to the complaints by the City against McPadden (No. 24375) and against Carpenter No. 24874)) cover the same identical area of land as Parking Lot D as described in Ordinance No. 86, page 4. 2. Your opinion that the party wall agreements in f+v' exceptions 2 and 4 of said policy will not affect the use of the V property for parking lot purposes. B. Re: Parking Lot A 1. Title policies covering parcels 2 and 3 which you letter advised have already been acquired by the City. 2. Copy of complaint in pending condemnation suit relative to parcel 1. 3. Copy of the option of the City as to the remaindf interest in parcel 1. 4. Will the lease referred to in exception 3 in the title policy No. 68257 create any problem. ORRICK DAHLOUIST. HERRINGTON a SUTCLIFFE Mr. William M. Houser, Jr, -2- April 18, 1961 5. What is proposed to be done with respect to the deed of trust mentioned in exception 4. C. Res Municipal Parking Lots 1, 2 and 3 1. Opinion that the City has good title to such lots as set forth in Ordinance No. 82 (1958 Series) and has title policies thereon gi'ling the number and date of such policies. Very truly yours, REMWIo eel Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer April 17, 1961 nrrisk, W114,aiat, uerrington & Sutcliffe 405 ti�ntgommry street - 10th Floor Ben Francisco h, Cellfornla ^ttn: 'Sdwntd So :Atchsll 0entl.enent The following in in answer to your telwhone mDusst of today to Willim mouser for detailed informaticn an mt anditurm incurred by the City in connection with our ,arking District i41o. 1 and for which reimbursenont will be secured from the proceeds of the series A bond sale. isonl Year 1955-56 P-to warrant ;tic. Vendor U�so�rint_i_on Dollar moy L=56—TA'JS— stone G'vsu retainer, conaa Ling �F iT m. - nerviose 6-11-56 2325 '"nuries Fitagam%ld :,praiaal of reasons nsroel 250.00 9-6-56 519 D. Jackson Fsumtem Faiginsam'ing Be�+art 3,000.00 19 - 8 312 D. Jackson Faustmen Printing Ex ense, revised 74.75 11-18-57 110h `t-me p,, Youngborg renort Financial re art 2,000.00 19 23 Telegrme-Tribume Legal ad for parking diet. 181.27 12-15-58 1232 'star C.w. 'atssh Appraisals, lob ? & D 1,768.00 3-2-59 1306 Title ins. Trust Co. 25' strip lying W. of 7. LD' of `aroal 2, Blk. 527 13,353.0 3-2-59 1307 Title Ins, k Trust Co. "areal 5, Blk. 527 25,337.5h 6-20-59 212E Title Ins. & Trust Co. To pay for tvm and interest 72.20 ,nd reoondiszg deed in con- noctian with warrant 1106 L-20-59 2036 U.S. -orealain cyowl ?Sher k w dL sign, )ortion 30.75 of lot a 1 -� 59 37 Freeman ign servlee Two aignna for lot 70.00 L-20-59 2057 Dual rarking Matter Co. 21 ^arkingo meters for lot 0 ?63.26 5-h-59 2320 ran Wim :-all & Lumber for signs 1.1.86 Lumber Co. 1959-60 1197 Title taut. '. 'hwt Litigation mnarar.U•ne, L'artwmtor Co. k :AcFadden nropories, percels 250.00 1 & 3, Blk. h33 t.etter to Orrick etrl -2- ,;aril. 17, 1961 3-7-60 1819 dn. i:. 'Tourer Jr. Retainer for legal services ' 500.00 in connection with con- deanation actions, lot D 1960-61 5-1-F 211 Chas. aorta :urvsy & map. Carpenter 362.00 ;property 9-19-60 525 Joe. 'rsenio Appraise Pezzoni parcel 5oo.00 1-16-61 1h05 Joe. Arsenio 'relied:,& y work in anpraieing e .1-6-61 1790 Fe wick Truebridge 'rofb�nall photographic 20.00 services, of.^icial statement for -eriea ^ bonds 4-3-M 1951 "icture Shop `Tint enlnrgements for 1.58 of.^icial statement h-3-61 196o '.T. & T. 'hone calls in connection 33.25 with official statement rv"ration 8 f'�Ib I hereby certify that the above information was extracted by me from official accosting records of the city aM that the oxnenditm were made for the rDurowes specified, tom best of my knowledge and belief. Sincerely yours, RICIAR0 D. MILM Administrative Officer RIM irda yinrr,s & f�nrdel v lGe qwp v. N w15 ATTORN[Y5 AT l W E V CTCw w. RgppEE RRtS BVI� ING I,IE[w Cv 3-G013 101 MMRSN STREET 8nn \U IB 06I.ro. Chform> April 17, 1961 Hon. Fred Waters Mayor, City of San Luis Obispo City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mayor Waters: I am advised by Mrs. Pezzoni that she does not feel that she can go through a trial and, as a con- sequence, she has authorized me to accept your offer contained in your letter of February 21, 1961. Very tr4ly yqur , e chard F. Harris RFH/cj XV, • • i Comments on off street parking--11iller, D.Q. This councilman is in favor of downtown offstreet parking facilities. Assuming those downtown property owners who receive a direct benifit pay a portion of the cost of installing these lots. The district before us tonight was started prior to my election to the council two years ago. Had I been a member of the council at that time I would have opposed the district. My reasons are:tbsr11s1a1sx 1. The downtown property owners will pay nothing toward the retirement of the district r e cjty bonda,unless the revenues from all the parting meters ink -Sewn Dare not sufficient to pay Interest and principle on the bonds. At this time meter revenues are sufficient to amortize the :hen improvement district bonds. L.,,Ihis city dasax"I establls-*assessment districts in residential are asis"ach residential total property owner pays his share of the assessment. XYP=17 aax=xt77 met// //�[.. �vG1 iA.t_ 'ix. Resolution No, 753 sets in all the terms and conditions for the ixxKzM issuance within the district. of series A oarking district bonds and any future bonds. The.. first article after the whereases citing the historical record of the need for the project and the legal steps taken so far by the Council under the State Constitution and laws of the state goes into definitions. This takes up nages 2 to It Y Article 2, pages 9 to 18 describes the bends to be issued, terms, call feataes, gives the'-i ' to be included on the bonds. Briefly $10,000 in honds mature each year from 1962 (July) to 1968, $15,000 from 1969 to 1975, and in 1976, $20,000. That totals $185,000. 2)�Mumdmixg These bonds can't be called until the maturity date indicated. Up to 15 years. The other $225,000 are set up to mature 10 years later or 1986. However, they can be called starting in 1966, five years from now, by paying varying percentages of ,— 4 7, 04,'+ V-t premiums. Only parldng revenue can be used from 1966 to 1976 and then, any city funds can be used to call the bonds. Starting in 1977, you have to call 820,000 of the 1225,000 each year for five years, then $25,00000 a year for five years, 1f (page 32) you haven't already. Article 3, pages 18 to 24, goes into the procedures which must be followed before you could issue additional bonds, and tells what we can do with the bond proceeds fbr series A. An{y accrued interest from the date of the bonds January 1, 1961 to the date of the bonds are delivered goes into a Bond Of the $L20,000, Service Fund to service the bonds. $30,000.00 goes into a Reserve Fund. The city reimburses itself for about f50,000.fcr costs previously advanced. The rest including any bond premium goes into an Acquisition and Improvement Fund to pay for the nurchase and development of the lots. Article L, pages 2h to 26 provides for the method of redemption for any future bonds issued. Article 5, pages 26 to 36 states the city agrees to maintain certain parking ureter rates during the 1-tat life of the bonds, to maintain meters on the streets and in the Iota, and the method of handling revenues. All lot revenues and net sbreet revenues go into the bond revenue fund within the first five business days of each following month, 1/6 of sad the next send -annual interest payment total is then set aside each month in the Boni Service fund as well as 1/12 of the next annual principal payment. The city can then recover any expenses incurred in connection with the narking lot operation, and than ery revenue left over can be transferred as the Council sees flt. And we have another resolution later on which transfers it back to the Off -Street Parking Reserve. And as I understand the cresent city policy, we can recover for the general fund, the cost of enforcing the meters if there is that much available. Or the Council could in 1966 decide to use some or all of this excess to call the bonds early. T i-ele also says that in 3RK 1976 the city has to start setting aside 1/12 of the 920,000 or $25,000 each month to be able to call that number of bonds at the end of each year. And there would be a sinking fund set up for that purpose. Article 6. pages 36 to 39 tells what happens in case of default by the city, and prorating of any revenues available. Here it must be borne in mind that besides the meter revenue and the ad valorem taking power within the district, the bond buyer has no other place to look for to get his money. Harever, the city agrees to maintain sufficient parking meter rates to pay the necessary ms in .rest and redemption, to give no free parking within the district, vWAw set up aea carpeting facilties within the district unless their revenue is also contributed, and so on. pages 39 to 45 Article 7 describes the covenants made by the city to the bond buyer. Actually binding contracts. All bonds have equal rigFts. City agrees to commence project and comclete as anon as possible. Agrees to maintain liability insurance, fidelity bowls on employees, keep accurate books, publish a summary annual resort within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, provides that the city will not sell any facilities during the life of the bonds, if condemned will try to acquire substitute revenue producing facilities, if can't, set aside proceeds to redeem bonds. Council to act as parking place ecmmissiom pages 46 fA to 47 Article 8. Provides that city can &PAM tSia resolution later% with the S Consent of 60% of the bond holders. Borne-okaegee sea bwsade V^ __,. ar it-: newaseaer. Article 9 pages 47 to 50 misc....limits liability of city, provides for successors in case the city ceases to exist, provides waiver of personal liability for city officers, and so on. t i> Y�ddalena Tire Co. Y' 990 Higueru it. San Luis Obispo California March 17, 1961 San Luis Obispo City Council 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo California Gentlemen: i,t the last meeting of the San Luis Obispo City Planning Commission on 1'L:roh 16, 1961 a use permit was grantad to ;'aino Construction Company to build a tire service and salas store for me at 474 1Sarsh :it., San Luis Obispo, Calif. Construction is to start immediately after a building permit has been issued. bir. b-aino has indicated if he is allowed to start construction by April 1, 1961, the building would be ready for occupancy by June 15, 1961 at the latest. There is also a ^ossibility thst the build- ing will be ready sooner. - Mr, l%ichard u5lller, City e,dministrator, has indicated the City is planning to start demolition of the building I now occupy approximately May 11, 1961. In order to avoid a double move and storage of all my enuipment and stock, plus the fact that I would be forced to causebusiness operations I would like to recuest permission, to continue on at my present location until my new store is ready. In event tha building is ready before t}e Tuna 15, 1961 data I wou'_d move immediutely. :tasp..ct£ully subs:ittad, Noel F:adcalana Owner STONE S YOUNGBERG Dwxlt[ S ... MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS pcnwwo MBwxi[t J CM[t.t VOUMOt[q pnivry EOwOrx Blwtxrx J. Nuu 1319 RV35 BUILDING EowwwoW BYwM[i we 0. GM,.. SAN FRANCISCO O Duo E. Newrt[i DOx M. P. E.— I.—. Jw. Butw M. N[wuwx Y VXON 1J19 Ev[n[ii 6 N1vLiwxf March 17, 1961 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: We have reviewed the copy of your worksheet proposed for use in accounting for fund transfers for Parking District No. 1. The provisions of the resolution appear to have been expressed correctly and we would have only minimum comments to make. The use of cents in the tabulation may result in some unnecessary work. Several cities confronted with this problem have rounded off their interest and principal requirements to even dollars and have adjusted by making a slightly smaller final monthly payment. In the example you supplied us, for instance, eleven deposits for principal of $834 each and a twelfth payment of $826 would eliminate the need to carry cents in the table. You may find it desirable also to transfer revenues to the nearest dollar and carry the cents into the next month. The entire question of whether or not to use cents in the transfer will be a matter for accounting judgment, but we do not believe the bond resolution makes this precision necessary. The city would retain such flexibility as you propose by leaving sur- plus in the Revenue Fund rather than making a transfer to the Off -Street Parking Reserve. You may be able to accomplish just as much by dts- continuing your present reserve and making expenditures for enforcement, additional off-street parking, and similar purposes directly from surplus in the Revenue Fund. The comments overleaf, as you can see, are unimportant as far as the overall operation of the parking district is concerned. We do believe some simplification may be possible. Sincerely yours, STONE & YOUNGBERG Richard M. Bartle RMB: sg IS N. N.o..ICK ORRICK. DAHLO UIST. HCR RIN OTON S SUTCLIFFC _ COUNSELORS ANO ATTORNEYS AT LAW T[L[FroNC EXS*DON 2 1120 eM 405 MONTGOMERY STREET $AN FMNCISM4.. CALIFORNIA CABLE ADDRESS "ORRICK A'T. .:'..'ASKS D .11.. AND— ......L... IDK ...... March 17, 1961 S �'�. s`SE Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. 1 Dear Mr. Miller: Supplementing our letter of March 16, 1961, we enclose seven copies of revised page 3 of the resolution approving the official statement and directing sale of the Series A bonds, copies of which were sent in such letter. Will you please substitute this revised page 3 for the page 3 in all of the copies previously sent to you. The revision consists of correcting an error as to the time of the commencement of the payment of interest which interest commences July 1, 1961. Very truly yours, Enclosure cc: Mr. Richard Bartle Stone & Youngberg Mr. William M. Houser, Jr. City Attorney ORRICK. DAHLOUIST. HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFIC COUNSELORS AND ATTORNEYS AT LAW Ox 405 MONTOOMERY STREET TELEMHONE E%RROOK 2'1120 FRANLCI[[SCAAO CCALIFORNIA C.B LF hDOpE35 "OP RIC N" ++.SAN sy Fly ti d' •<0%,^J ti March 16, 1961 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Re: Ci�of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. 1 Dear Mr. Miller: / .r ,• i^� �`�•1'. We have instructed the printer (Sorg Printing Company) to send directly to you copies of the printed resolu- tion authorizing the issuance of the Series A Bonds. x This resolution is scheduled for adoption on March 20, 1961. The resolution number should be inserted in the blank space and the blank spaces on pages 50 and 51 should be appropri- ately filled in Norhe printer of the resolution should be advised at once of the vote so they can print the additional copies of the resolution for mailing. We understand that Mr. Bartle of Stone & Youngberg is writing to you about this. %Two certified copies of such resolution should be sent to us.copy should also be sent to the bond printer who will print the bonds, the form of which is contained in the resolution�The bond printer should be instructed to end us a proof of the bond form before printing in final form.lease return to us the enclosed mimeographed slip so that we will know the name of the bond printer. Lg�,'Prior to the adoption of the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds, the Council will adopt the resolution determining that no parking place commission shall be appointedt, the form of which was sent to you with our letter of February 26, 1961. We enclose seven copies of resolution approving the official statement and directing sale of the Series A Bonds. This The printer advises that 12 copies of thisvere sent with the words "Proof of Wednesday, March 15, 1961" thereon. Another 8 copies have also been sent to you without these words. The latter form should be used for adoption and for certified copies. ORRICK. DAHLOUIST. HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE Mr. Richard D. Miller -2- March 16, 1961 resolution is also scheduled for adoption on March 20dA copy of this resolution should be submitted at once as soon as you receive this letter to the San Luis Obispo County Telegram - Tribune with instructions to set in type the notice of sale on pages 3 - 6. 6 The newspaper should be requested to submit proof of the notice o sale to you and to us for checking and on clearance of the proofs to publish the__notice once not later than March 23, 1961 and thereafter to file affidavit of publication with you and to forward two such affidavits to uslothe newspaper will also have to be instructed to print copies or the notice of sale on plain white paper for mailing to interested bidders. We understand that this mailing will be made by Stone & Youngberg and that Mr. Bartle is also writing you in this connection. The official statement which is also to be approved by this resolution will be sent to you by Mr. Bartle of Stone & Youngberg. 0 Will you send two certified copies of this resolution to us. We will forward to you prior to April 12, 1961 (the date of the sale of the bonds) a form of resolution selling the bonds to be adopted by the Council on that date. You will observe that the date of sale is Wednesday, April 12, 1961 which is not a regular meeting date for the Council. Accordingly, the regular meeting preceding April 12 should be ad- journed to April 12 at 11 o'clock. Notice of such adjournment should be posted in accordance with Section 54955 of the Govern- ment Code and we would be obliged if you would arrange to have sent to us an affidavit of such posting together with a copy of the form of notice posted. Very truly yours, Enclosures cc: Mr. Richard Bartle Stone & Youngberg Mr. William M. Houser, Sr. City Attorney w. X. eAAICR OARIC K. DANLO UIST. HERRINOTON S SUTCLIFFE COUNSELORS API. ATTORNEYS AT LAW O,N LpUI[T T[0116. TALE,.... EX.ROe. 21110 x Omx 405 MON!GOMERY STREET G[L[ Aoow[Os "O RRIC N" [Rm [av UTFI[ SAN FRANCISCO 4.CALIFORNIA ORVILLE ROHLF OMAIE,O Rx[R M F[ OWAAO E -TCHELL JAM [f X AO N=^AIT. I March 9, 1961 AxoA[w pO.RCYyM[Y .. OA AICR Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. 1 Dear Mr. Miller: Pursuant to discussion yesterday with Mr. Bartle of Stone & Youngberg, we have sent a draft of the resolution providing for the issuance of the bonds to Sorg Printing Company to be printed. We have directed the printer to send six copies of the proof directly to you for your consideration. You will recall that the resolution is scheduled for adoption at the regular meeting of March 20, 1961. Prior to that date, we should make any revisions in the draft and have the resolution printed In page form for use in adoption at such meeting. Very truly yours, cc: Mr. William M. Houser, Jr. City Attorney x In The Superior Court of The State of California In and for the County of San Luis Obispo AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ila_.the..Ma,Ltss..oi'..PaxkxaB. D.1atrlat...No.._l, City_.oS_ San..Lui a..Qizl.apo-....__.._.......... ................ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, es. County of San Luis Obispo I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen and not interested in the above -entitled ..matter--_ .............__.._.. .__.._ _....___... I am now, and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY TELEGRAM -TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general cir- culation, printed and published daily, Sundays excepted, at the City of San Luis Obispo in the above named county and state; that NOTICE. OF. .HEARING..-OIf..QUESTIGN.OF DISPENSING WITH PARKING PLACE CQIVV1$SiQN of which the annexed clipping is a true printed copy, was published in the above -named newspaper and not in any supplement thereol— on The following dates, to -wit: ....... Mar, ... $,... 101........ .... ... .... _........ ......... .......... _ _. that said newspaper was duly and regularly ascertained and established a newspaper of general circulation by Decree entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, on June 9, 1952, under the provisions of Chapter 1, Division 7. Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California. I certify for declare) under penalty of perjury that the fore- going is It correct. Wil r C gar46igaature of Pnndpoi Clerki Data . .....................I 18.61 "ITRIIN coy Clerk. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PARKING DISTRICT NO, 1 RESOLUTION N0. 752 (19GI Series) RESOLUTION FIXING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING ON QUESTION OF D=.SPENSING WITH PARKING PLACE COMMISSION AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF. WHERL..S, pursuant to verified petition for the formation of a parr ng district in the City of San Luis Obispo, pursuant to the Pa=,ing District Law of 1951, Resolution No. 370 (1958 Series) adopted May 19, 1958 declaring its intention to form a parking die-rict to be known as "Parking District No. 1 of the City of Sar Luis Obispo" and the Parking District Law of 1951 and procee---ings duly had and taken thereunder, the Council of the Cit;, of San Luis Obispo, by Ordinance No. 86 (1958 Series) adopted July 7, 1958, declared Parking District No. 1 of the City of San Luis Obispo formed as therein des- cribed; and WHEREAS, the Parking District Law of 1951 pro- vides that if the petition for the formation of a parking district thereunde.r so expressly authorizes, at any time following a hearlr:k after such notice as the Council pre- scribes, it may de-termine that no Parking Place Commission shall be appointeefor such parking district and the Council shall thereafter ,nave all powers, ,Jurisdiction and authority granted to and al_ duties Imposed upon the Commission pursuant to said Parking D-_-trict Law of 1951; and 1 WHEREAS, said petition for the formation of said Parking District No. 1 of the City of San Luis Obispo did ex- pressly so authorize and did provide that the Council of the City shall assume all the powers and duties of any Parking Place Commission authorized to be appointed by the Council pursuant to the Parkins, District Law of 1951 and shall not appoint any such Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, as follows: 1. Each and all of the foregoing recitals are hereby found and determined to be true and correct. 2. The Council hereby fixes Monday, the 20th day of March, 1961, at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, In the City Hall, City of San Luis Obispo, California, as the time and place for hearing on the question of determining that no Parking Place Commission shall be appointed for said Parking District No. 1. 3. Notice of said hearing shall be given by publishing notice thereof once at least ten (10) days before the day fixed for said hearing in the SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY TELEGRAM -TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general circulation printed, published and circulated in said City and the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause such notice thereof to be so published. Such notice shall be in substantially the follow- ing form: 2 • CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO• PARKING DISTRICT NO, 1 NOTICE OF HEARING ON QUESTION OF DIS- PENSING WITH PARKING PLACE COMMISSION, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 20th day of March, 1961, at 8:00 P,M., in the Council Chambers, in the City Hall, City of San Luis Obispo, California, have been fixed by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as the time and place for hearing on the question of determining that no Parking Place Commission shall be appointed for Park- ing District No. 1 of the City of San Luis Obispo.. At said time and place any interested person may appear and be heard upon the question of dispensing with a Parking Place Commission for said parking district. In the event the Council shall determine after said hearing that no Parking Place Commission shall be appointed for said parking district, the Council shall thereafter have all powers, jurisdiction and authority granted to and all duties imposed upon the Commission pursuant to the Parking District Law of 1951 (being Part 4 of Division 18 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California). BY ORDER OF THE COUNCIL OF THE C17Y OF SAN LUIS OBISPO. Dated: March 6, 1961 Is/ J, H. Fitz atrick y er 4. This resolution shall take effect from and after its passage and approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 1961, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey, J. Barry Smith, Fred M. Waters. NOES: None ABSENT: None /s/ Fred M. Waters Mayor of -Vie City of San Luis Obispo, Attest: California /s/ J. It. Fitzpatrick City Clerk 3 I, J. H. Fitzpatrick, the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo, do hereby certify that the fore- going is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 792 (1961 Series), passed and adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the _ day of M ,., h , 1961. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of San Luis Obispo this 9th day of March 1961. y er CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 751 (1961 Series) RESOLUTION DE—ERMINING TO ISSUE BONDS UNDER SECTION 35402.1 OF T.'z CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE WHERE--S, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo by Ordinancs No. 86 (1958 Series) adopted July 7, 1958, declared Par,-ing District No. 1 of the City of San Luis Obispo formec as therein described; and WHERE.--3, the City of San Luis Obispo has contracted or obtained optior._ for the purchase of, or has obtained con- demnation ,Judgments covering, that portion of the land, prop- ertv and rights of way to be acquired in said Parking District No. 1 as proposed _n Resolution No. 370 (1958 Series) adopted May 19, 1958, and _n said Ordinance having an assessed value as shown on the last :aualized assessment roll used by said City for purposes of City t.>:.xation of at least 80% of the assessed value of all land, prope---y and rights of way to be acquired; and WHER&--S, said Council by Resolution No. 733 (1961 Series) adop-.ed February 1, 1961, declared its Inten- tion to issue bond.- under Section 35402.1 of the California Streets and Hlghwa--s Code and to give notice thereof in the time and manner tce ,ein provided; and WHER&--S, said resolution and notice fixed Monday, March 6, 1961, at :00 P.M. in the Council Chambers 1n the City Hall, City of San :.:is Obispo, California, as the time and place for hearing object_sns to said proceedings under said Section 35402.1 of the Cal._fornia Streets and Highways Code; and 1 WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was given in the time, form and manner provided in said resolution and as re- quired by law; and WHEREAS, said hearinrG was duly held by said Council at said time and place; and WHEREAS, no objections were filed or made to proceedings under said Section 35402.1 of said Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, as follows: 1. Each and all of the foregoing recitals are hereby found and determined to be true and correct, 2. This Council, following said hearing, determined and hereby determines that all of the territory within said Parking District No. 1 will be benefited by the acquisition of that portion of the land, property and rights of way which the City so has under contract, option or condem- nation judgment as hereinabove recited. 3. The Council, as an alternate procedure to tnat prescribed in Sections 35400 and 35402 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State oC California, will issue bonds as provided in Part 4 of Divislon 1B of said Code under Section 35402.1 of said Code, 4. The Council may, by Ordinance, Resolution or Indenture, provide for the issuance of bonds of said Parking District No. 1 in an amount estimated to be necessary to make all of the proposed acquisitions and improvements and to pay the additional items specified in Section 35402 of said Streets and Highways Code, 2 5. The Council has estimated and hereby estimates that the amount necessary to make all of the pro- posed acquisitions and improvements and to pay the additional items specified in Section 35402 of said Streets and Highways Code to be the sum of $420,000. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of March, 1961, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Miller, J. Barry Smith, Gerald W. Shipsey, Fred M. Waters. NOBS: None ABSENT: :None /s/ Fred M. Waters Mayor of the City o an Luis Obispo California Attest: PC�e- 3 I, J. H. Fitzpatrick, the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo, do hereby certify that the fore- going is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 751 (1961 Series), passed and adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the 6ch day of March , 1961. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of San Luis Obispo this Bch day of March , 1961. y er ORRICK. DAHLOUIST. HERRINGTON & SUTCUrre COU NSELORS AN D ATTOMN SYS AT LNR T[L[cxox[ EX .... R 2-1120 405 MONTGOMERY STREET $AM FRANOISM 4.CAL.IORNIA GSL[ ADDRESS ' ORRICK" February 28, 1961 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall � _f San Luis Obispo, California Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. 1 �SF�1_ Dear Mr. Miller: We have prepared and enclose seven copies of each of the following: 1. Resolution determining to issue bonds under Section 35402.1 of the Streets and Highways Code. This resolution is -� scheduled for adoption at the meeting of March 6, 1961 after the hearing heretofore scheduled on such matter. OPlease ,sen_0 ug two certified c0 itL Of _th _rg o,_jyyt�,pp .,.afYe�r_.,15_. i6__ad4pi€d. 2. Resolution fixing time and place of hearing on ques- tion of dispensing with Parking Place Commission. This resolution should also be adopted at the meeting of March 6. You will observe that it sets a he�l1ring on such matter for Monday, March 20, 1961 and provides thaYdhotice shag, _,.oe._.p11�;S.ah�C_012Ae at .lga t tgn__{iays before that time in the San Luis Obispo County Telegram -Tribune. It would be advisable to submit,a copy of the notice appearing_on ._.._.�._ _�_-`-----._ page j or the resolution to the newsppa�per at once with direction ror them o pu s e same on he__ th or 9th of March.Z)A-proof notice should -Ve—senFff—w ff_-possible,DAfter the publication an affidavit of publication should be filed with the ,City Clerk and two counterparts thereof sent to us 6 ill you also please send us wo cer ie co es o this resolu 3. Resolution determining that no Parking Place Commis- sion shall be appointed. This resolution should be adopted on March 20, 1961 after the hearing on the question referred to in the preceding paragraph.(Lwo r i£-d_uoDles_-Df_..this...r-eaQlution should also be sent to us. We are presently preparing a draft of the resolution providing for the issuance of the bonds in accordance with data received from Stone & Youngberg. According to their letter of February 13, 1961, this resolution is scheduled for adoption at the regular meeting of March 20. As noon as we have a draft of the resolution we will send It to you for examination. Very truly yours, (/// Enclosures / ,�,� /, [ cc:Enclosures sur William M. Houser, Jr. ( ���^ stone & tZrIgberg February, 24, 1961 Pnlifornia State Polytechnic College Mr. Howard C. Brow, Head Ornamental Horticulture Department San Luis Obispo. California Dear Sir: 0 The City Council considered your recommendation for saving the two palm trees in the area of the nnw proposed City parking lot at its regal= crating of February 20. 1961. and wishes to thank you for year interest in these trees. The otter of retaining these tw palm trees will be considered in the design of the parking lot. DRespectfully, J. H. FITZPATRICK City Clark J9P:n1• STONES YOUNGBERG D.Nm s.ex[ MUNICIPAL PINANCINO CONSULTANTS pc➢xnF J Cwwufu vouxofuu Prowx INUN 1314 RUSS BUILDING EevAwO WBunx[.. PiCMxwp F. Grona SAN FRANCISCO 4 oxvlo E Xwnn DR. N.Owv�f IM— M. N.—A. VUwOx -1319 Eowix AW[t.A JN E`.u[.i D. W. February 23, 1961 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: Enclosed are five copies of a draft of material which Dick Bartle and I pre- pared relating to the district bonds and the off-street parking project. Will you please distribute the copies for review and comment. Please feel free to make any additions, comments, or corrections which you feel are desirable. You will notice that some information pertaining to the district off-street parking project is still required. In particular, it would be helpful if we could obtain: 1. The acquisition and improvement costs for the existing off-street lots in the district (page 17). 2. A breakdown of gross on -street and gross off-street revenues by fiscal years (page 21). We can complete the table on page 25 after we have this information. 3. The number of on -street meters inside the district and those out- side the district and an estimate of the percentage of gross on - street revenues which can be expected from each source. I plan to be in San Luis Obispo on Tuesday, February 28 and Wednesday, March 1 and would like to go over your comments or corrections at that time. it would also be helpful if I could obtain any required additional information then. Sincerely yours, STONE IS YOUNGBERG James S. Saffran JSS:bp Encls. G,n[L s.oN. STONE F. YOUNGa ERG gr[n,wo N. mw+.e J CwwLO{ vcvNCF[wc MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS q,.LnN EBwoWn B[x.r.[nrN J. MUN IJIq pV$5 BUILDING [Ow,.wO WBVnnF+ PcnnwP P. Gwa[ SAN FRANCISCO 4 9.vr9 E. Nwm.er pOx N. pwVM YUKON r�r9 fonlN /r. W[µ[, Jw Bowwr N, N[wnwx fv[nv+ O. M.unw February 23, 1961 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: Edward Mitchell of Orrick, Dahrquist, Herrington 6 Sutcliffe is working on the bond resolution for Parking District No. 1 in accordance with recommendations we have made as to maturity schedule, application of funds, etc. We expect that he will have substantially completed the bond resolution by March 6, but we doubt that it will be ready in final form for adoption at the council meeting that day. We expect that a sale date of April 6 will be possible if the resolution is adopted at the regular meeting of March 20. We should be prepared to publish the notice of sale immediately after the council acts on it and also should be prepared to mail the final resolution and official statement as soon as the council's action is com- plete. The meeting of March 6 may provide you with an opportunity to review pertinent points of the bond resolution with the council and the extra two -week period should en- able everyone to understand thoroughly all the provisions of the resolution and make any changes which seem appropriate. Consideration has been given to the possibility of requesting a special meeting March 13 for the resolution but we doubt that any particular advantage could be gained. Jim Saffran will be in a position to review some of the basic points to be con- tained in the resolution when he meets with you next week to go over the official state- ment draft. Sincerely yours, STO' IE 6 YPUNGBERG Richard M. Bartle RMB:bp February 21, 1961 r Mr. Janes P. atirm Stone and Youngberg 1314 Russ Building San Francisco 4, California Dear Mr. Saffron: I have your letter of February lb, 1961 enclosing estimated project costs is connection witu our forthcoming bond sale. I have gone over these very carefully and feel that ve should stay with the $420,000 for the following reasons among others: (1) Last uvening, the City Council gave the Mayor informal authority to go up another 52,500 ou the remaining parcel to be acquirnd for Site i.; (2) We have been approached by the horticultural people at Cal Poly to attempt to save two polls tress un Site A, which may require some kind of vederground drainage system; (3) Sine Lot D is in the very heart of the downtown business and theatre district, we may decide to do more than routine treatment in the way of landscaping and decorative lighting; (4) Should wUr negotiations on Site A fall through, there may conceivably be extensive court, appraisal, and legal fees involved in the resulting trial; (5) We are a little gun-shy as for as running short in bond moneys is eoa- earned, in view of the Whale Rock Water Project which you are no doubt somewhat familiar with. We would rather end up with cask bond moneys left over than to be short again. Simearelv yours_ February 21, 1961 Mr. Richard F. Harris Attorney at Law He: City vs. rezzoni 1101 Marsh street San Luia Obispo, California Dear Mr. i:arris: In reply to your offer of February 20, 1961, on the subject condemnation, please be informed that the Council tas authorized me to offer your client the following proposal: The sum of Fifteen Thousand Dollara (315,000.00), payable .:hen the pond proceeds are received, and your client will be permitted to occupy the promises until September 1, 1961. This offer is made for tie purposes of compromise and settlement of the pendtav litigation and, of course, will not be binding on the City in the event we must continue with U,e suit. 1ha (:ity Council further requested that 1 inform you that this proposal is final, as they do not wish to consider any counter proposal. Very truly your, FRFA M. WA Zi 9 v Mayor ra 1 �., r Nems & ��a rci e� P ICM PPS !. p15 ATTORNEYS AT LAW • L Pw... P [T CP N. NPP OCL >R RIS INO L UILOIfl Cw�v ]-9fl 1] 101 R: STR1CCT �eo Lis 0� po. CG11 IOrAle February 20, 1961 Honorable Fred Waters Mayor City of San Luis Obispo City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Re: Pezzoni - City San Luis Obispo Condemnation Dear Mayor Waters: I have discussed your recent letter in which you propose a compromise of the above -entitled litigation, with Mrs. Pezzoni. She has authorized me to submit the following offer as a basis for compromise on her part. The City Pay her the sum of $17,500.00 She is to have the privilege of an additional year's occupancy from the date of this letter within which to secure other premises into which to move. I will appreciate your taking this matter up with the members of the City Council and thereafter advising me as to the possibilities of settlement of the matter. Vedv tru��l1IyyIp y rs, h car diF, rr� Attorney for Mrs. Pezzoni STONE S YOUNGBERG D.xla s.Px[ MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS J Uwuu[vocxOOoc en E9woWr. 0[x�xxlx J. NUx I314 RUS5 BUILDING EOWxno WBuwx[+r Rmxwwo R. Gxos[ SAN FRANCISCO 4 p[wo E. N[xnv DOx M. Dwv1[ YUxOx 1 I]I9 Eow�x .[, W[ua Jx ywm M. N[wwx _v[v[+r p. Wx.4x9 February 16, 1961 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: Enclosed is an estimate of total costs of the off-street parking project. Will you please review this estimate carefully? We may have failed to include a major expenditure item. Based upon our estimates, sale of $420,000 of bonds would provide a contingency allowance of almost $45,000. If, after review, you feel that estimated project costs or the contingency allowance should be reduced, the principal amount of bonds to be sold can be reduced accordingly. Estimates of acquisition costs for the parcels already acquired and for expenses to be reimbursed to the city from bond proceeds were obtained from material sent to us December 17, 1960. Estimates of site improvement costs, meter costs, and contingencies were obtained from page 12 of the revised Faustman report. Legal and financing expenses and the Reserve Fund contribution were estimated by us and are based on sale of $420,000 of parking district bonds. Sincerely yours, STONE 6: YOU4'NGB�E�RG +. James S. Saffran JSS:bp Encl. ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Land Acquisition Site A Parcels acquired $ 39,191 To be acquired 51,000 Site D To be acquired 187,000 $277,191 Demolition and site improvement Site A 12,000 Site D 24,000 36,000 Incidental Expenses Parking meters 10,000 Financing, legal, bond printing 15,000 Reimbursable city expenses through 9/19/60 8,039 33,039 Transfer to Reserve Fund 30,000 Contingency Allowances 30,000 Estimated total project cost $406,230 Estimated bond issue $420,000 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I. J. H. Fitzpatrick, duly appointed and acting City Clark of the City of San Luis Obispo, certify that the following are the assessment values of the real property of the property being acquired by the City of San Luis Obispo on behalf of Parking District No. L: LOT A Lend $ 14.160.00 Improvements S.160.00 TOTAL $ 19,320.00 $ 19.320.00 TAT D Land $ 27,700.00 Improve ants 13,830.00 TOTAL $ 41,530.00 $ 41,530.00 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE Or REAL PEDlnTT BRINK: ACQUIRED BY PARKING DISTRICT 80. 1 $ 60,850.00 I further certify that of the $ 60,850.00 the City has already acquired by purchase from the special off-street parking reserve food, the following portion of LOT A: LAP A, Parcel 2, Assessed value of real property $ 4,860.00 LOT A, Parcel 3. Assessed value of real property 2,650.00 $ 7,510.00 I further certify that Judgement on Condesnstlon was filed on January 30, 1961 in favor of the City of Sao Luis Obispo for all the real property in LOT D: LOT D. Assessed Value of Real Property $ 41,530.00 TOTAL ACQUIRED BY THE CITY $ 49.040.00 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE OP REAL PROPRRTY BEING ACQUIRED BY THE PARKIN' DISTRICT $ 60,850.00 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE OF REAL PRLPSRTY M EADV ACQUIRED BY TKI PMUMO DISTRICT $ 49,040.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF REAL PMZM NOT ACQUIRED NY THE PARKISD DIBTRICr i 13y810y00 Dated: February 9, 1961 City Clerk City of San Luis Obispo, California NOTICE OF ADJOURNMENT OF REGULAR MEETING NOTICE IS REMY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of San Luis Chispo adjourned its Regular Meeting of January 16, 1961 to 5!00 P. M. -<ednesday, February 1, 1951 at the City Council Chambers, City [fall, 99C Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California City Clerk STATE OF ''.'..IFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT 07 POSTING NOTICE Be. OF ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING COUNTY Ud Sr.J LUIS OBISYO ) J. H. FITZPATRICK, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that I sm the duly appointed, qualified and acting Clerk of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo and that the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo held Monday, January 16, 1961 we nejourned to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF ADJOURNIUM attached hereto: that at the lour of 12:15 A.M. P.S.T. Tuesday, January 17. 1961 I posted a copy of said notice on the door of the Council Chamber, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, at which said meting of January 16. 1961 was held. �4�clzy �G Sebaeribed and Sworn to Saturn m this 17th day of Jamlry, 1961. 11vL last M. Homer, Jr. Notary Public in and for said County and State E N G I N E E R I N G .## A G R I C U L T U R E . it A R T S s 5 C I E N C E 5 CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE. San Luis Obispo, California February 9, 1961 Mayor Fred M. Waters City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mayor Waters: I read recently that the City of San Luis Obispo has purchased the property at 1224 Chorro Street and that there are plans to develop this into a parking lot. I would like to call your attention to the two fine Washingtonia Palms that are growing near the sidewalk on this property. These are two of the finest specimens in the city and as a horticulturist I want to urge that consideration be given to saving them. After the area is paved they could survive for years in a four foot square without doing damage to the paving. We have lost so many of our fine trees in the city that I think every consideration should be given to saving those that are in good health. Retaining these trees would probably eliminate only one parking space and I feel sure that the beauty that they create would more than offset this. Sincerely yours, Howard C. Brown, Head Ornamental Horticulture Department (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) WILLIAM M. HOUSER, JR.TO0 " NAT LAW ENDORSED GPPALL . AT LA SAN LUIY ODISPO, CALIFORNIA ' FILED 4 JAN 3 01961 Auomey for Plldntlff ___.. A. E. RU l fi,_[/H►Y19 Cwr„ ar �rufll,..ryliKry+1G+X erk DEPUTY CEEPA n 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ATTEST: A TRUE COPY 10 A. AL G/County Cerk 11 Tfsb CITY of 3AN LU13 �SS3FL, a munielpal twporetim DEPUTY CLERK 12 13 Plaintiff No. tLBTh r• ) JWONSNT IU CUA9*19iLT M 14 ) 15 IBi:R3 J. CARFSYM ) ) Defendant ) lc_________________ 17:.. TRC 3TIPSP.ATl i- Y TAE ruLRMZZ AND GCkV CALM AXIrW ItEb 9mma, i8 .T Az &AEBY UiDi im. A"vmtD Am 360am that upon the P&I into Court for 19 the banefit of the defendant 11=1; J. CABPRI'Yi, as her interev-::. nor x:,4+zr, of 20 tba am of OIL HUA AiibO Alu FWrY-PQtrt THODUM lk-L ii-; (82144,WO.W), there shall be cardamned to ttw plaintiff in fea Staid+ aueelute !h* ree.7, property, 22 prtsJarty ri;;hta, l.saeet:old rights and llgreee,ents tteracm portaininy W the 23 realty described in plsintiffrs emplatnt an file heroin for nutlia purposes, 24 including public ,narking places. 25 .. I3 r,:RT.-ZR EXQD::i+Rfl, ADJ%MPD AM Q'a:CRBM that Us ase for Q-A& 26 said propa'tr is sought to be cardamed, to wit for public parkin», ylseoa, is 27 al:t'.FOrised Ly 1", and is and alas a ywVJ:I use. and that tha taking in eanday. 26 nstl: '.y plaintiff is and ImIs necessary for said public we. IT is IiU;C!u: CHlJfit.«a, tiJ7AY,5U a's: DFxhi,..D LGat Lna fwly*crt into 30 Court of su.Ld aQuy as harsirlwfore w;wuiflsd, Is In full Payment for V.e 31 :u'ci'ar't:%, r'F ruts, leaatAwld LiCt:te oru3 IJl tel'eUt so tams, and for all 32 da xltva Of ovary kind arni nature suffered try said desexignte by raOsss of tim I 11 Ukin,, of sai4 property rights and interest thereon wnd the construction of tho 2pidie iayarovemat in the momwer proposed by Uw plaintiff. 3 IT I3 PYIltMPai U,dCLvD# SDJUDt". A?W D6CA= ust such parV n•rsto is 4 to bees his or her own coats of suit incurred !wrsim, w d no party hereto is to 5 we@~ Bush onto •O 104"l". 6 Ot17E61961. RAY B. LYON 7 1 Judge r ' 9 10 11� i 12 13 14 15 16i 17I 181 19 II 201 21' 22, 231'i t 24 25 26 271 281 29 301; 31 .w .nix ...... ux wrwna.e. c.�. 8, wan a�eaaa I' h 1F allae RLCARngG, r.k.A,F R6Tl`Rs TO 40 0 Spas Bts ee for recn TAer'a use only. a AmaraI n.re -30�-.14it1 s \ 6-10'79 Mrse Irene d. Cerpenty San Ix,is_ •:k=sP°1 ...%a:11*!t, :; is Deer Pie\ee refer to the foiloeina e91eeeeol'11 n.. no. >v[\een us. T..0 premise t: in said In lne City f Sia lB1YZaI` County, Precinct or Island of San;dl _ALjakq __. ^a^'n At _Zalitornia \ore perticalarly deee1teI4 \e fallow. A7.1 that part of 3J cjy Seventeen �'_i) in th,z :'tax. leis Obispo aocorcILM to Harris and blardls m9p. thereof on file it thl `-,A,r the County'Recorder of the :ounL ty of San ,:a Obispo, State of Csllfal'i :-:-'kM"r'c:ed as to, Iare: bev.1r:.irW At a r--:,,nt :here the Northerly 1171r .,e: Street irteraecto the lia«, •, ',e,r+ +Peat, and Mnn:ini 'hr,; ».. lusaterlY along top, L"tarly . re .,r _ :K -hindre. .1f,' ,art, .; rieht ar:glea Northeasterly ' srverit, ✓c +. ,err or ?> y. et.y„ .e Y ._ .rr. yes Scu+.heester7y Along the .r ..-•. riwe+s. '-,y one h;:r.ired (Wc0) feet to the `crt�, V': lira- ra atrerf., thara .., l+.'ive: _ 'iv e!oI* the Northerly Pine of __'-e+.re-a 3treen, ssv+l-. ..-:� 1 zj 1Pw , it A paint ct begireiinc. P1 .... 51C.Ify your MrN`Aest to the f.y.colrig by '101ro to the up... P,,'Ad.d bole., TOOT. truly. UMDAAD OIL COMPANY OF CALIMMIA STANDARD OIL COtPMT OF MIMMI& tmkrN OPINtATIMAL INC. Its AtbTrnq iD.Jract TO: In r5sk, grATE OF CALIFORNIA ODUNTy OF San Luis Obispo 0, rebruary 10 1961, - bd.rt ., th,, dmg,M. Nblil sod Its said Quasi and ,susbolly eppssred. .... .. . ............... . . . haesvi as we to be the ps.- - is usiorilssl to tM ottluls betnessal •..WT'd th., he t to;�' "d'h, N 08 one 0 e a e rrenc InTNL%S .7 bend peater. M� P.WJ,. is .4 1.,, rid, usistax, WRO RACORTIM. Pt RanR RRrnea TO: • • I riD we sxve for recorder' . un only Dal. January 30, 1961 so 6-1079 Mra"_Bemice McFadden and Mrs, Thelm B. Jean D larioo 4rerar _--_.__ Manhattan Beach, :aliifornu � Ifeadeaau- ) Pin »br to the following Yr~at(s) n ace operative between us: L4400 da 7sbrua g s o preNees rsbrred to in said wereaent(a) are located in toe city of ;Ain fbi/aNh, seaway, rrec/ant or raland , state of Dalifcz- as Mare D erif evl RlT described as fotiaee: All that part of Block 17, in the amity of San Win Obispo, accordirig Le Harris and lard's Pap thereof on file in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Luis (blepo, Stale of California, described as followat Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Oros Street In said City, distant thereon 1Y9 feet 5 inches fros the Southwesterly corner of Monterey and Oeoe Streets, and at the intersection of the center line of the Southeasterly sell of the Obispo Theatre Ruilding with said Westerly line of Once Street and ruMiaig thence South 540 06, West, along said center line of said wall, 60 feet 7 inches to the 3asterly 114 Of the lot of Irene J. �ArpeMwr; thence South ,30 55' Bs It almW said lies to the northerly line of Higuere Street, theme Sonthe►eterly altmig the !forth line of Higeera Street to the desterly line of Once Street; thenog,,,'..'� Northwesterly along the easterly lint of Coos Street, to the point of beginning. Said property is situated at the Norfhweat corn,, of Higuora and Once Streets. i -tvb, autj.,ty named to terainslp wa:d aerevaanUs) efrevtiv# ran aI_ at ,1 •. ,_l,�_ Pl..., .1en10 ) r AEreeaent the I.re going by sl(nin{ /n the sysCe Pro,w.o osl oe. Yours truly. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA By STMOARO OIL COWANY OF CALIMMIA, sEETEM OPERATIONS, INC. Its Attar ey n Ft AGRELfI TO' `f - .L/ 1ltorney Fw't rA1M.rdedo. M,.A s-sA6.A �. CD�;O�s01 IlutfAl Tererlmtla - Agrsei Ml r • • SPACE BELOW FOR FILING BTAYP ONLY) 1 WILUAMM.YATLAW JR. ENDORSED ATTORNEY NEY AT LAW ' V ... PALM IIIWI 2 IAN LIIlSj RIAC, OACALIFORNIA 3 FILED 4 JAN 3 01961 5 Attorney for 21alntlff A. E. ALLAGH, County CIed1 --- -- Dy......�U fH,.1 AR_ty�X0 6 DEWJIY CIE 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 10 ATTEST : A TRUE COPY 11 TU Ores Of SAd Inns 0111 u, a ) A. Pal mr� r") ALLAGH, /unty Cle k 12.. tuniti lwraLlan )) 7 r� _� a.c ------ —`-- D6eYTY CLERK ':aintiff b, 13 3 14 JUPO1M IA 00ADEN"2 011 ) MMICE la'.XAS MA1'AJUBd, et al ) 15 ) 16Defendants } ------"---"---..-- 17 " TFS :3TIP11W.ICW Cf VIE FASTIRS A= IM3 CAUSF, AP M111.G -2-MEIPM, 1E IT A;; A nAY CRDPP.ED, ADJI)<Gn AHD 1) RW that iq c the pag,slnt !mto Court for 19 the benefit of the (efarEdents M:'iiNICB OW42 4eFADtnrTt and THKUa DRC1,S3 JLQ1, 2" as tapir Interests any appear, of the stm of FORT!THRI'n i:1'11301' MLL410 `- ;343,E')0,7.O0), than dle)1 h condemned to the plaintiff ;a fen simple absolute 2`. the real pror.erty, prcTRrfv righte, leasehold ri,^,htc and im;nNive enta theraft pertaining to the realty described in plaintiffIla aolglai.nt on file herein for yrablic purposes, including public parking plaees, I7 1.1 FURMi CEIMM, ADdVXjF.3 LQ Crck= ttat tho ase for which ^" said property is Sought to be condensed, to sit, for ;uuullc parkl.ng places, IS 2^ authorized by law, and is and was a puull, use, and that the txkinQ In ccmdasr 2E radon by plaintiff Is and was recossary for said public use. 29 :T 13 FART,' Cr"ni D, AP.diDopr AK3 DF !2xD that tile psymant into 30 Conn of said money as hersinoelors speclfiad, is in Hull payment for the 31 property, property rights, leasehold r1ghU acre intoresc so taken, sl:d for all 32 ds-vpcs oe every kind and rAture suffered of said defendants b; roaan: of tiA 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Uld of acid proymV righto and lntorost tberam sod the oonstroetion of Hs public it:}.rorwont in the eWmer p_rojooed by the plaintiff. IT 19 rtffiWU UXOM.&, IP,JW4D. An llfGt6AD that each VWW hereto is to boar his or her car casts of suit incurred heroin and no .arty hereto is to resaror OW at" costs so incurred. LAINDI 1941. 61 RAY B. LYON .XX.I Al �n l. MX WIi ORRICK. DANLOUIBT, HERRINGTON S SUTCLirr! COUNSELOPS AND ATTORNEYS AT LAW T[L[rMOx( E%MOOR SIIEO 4 Ow6NLOV�aT [ x N (OS xONTOO STREET SAM FMHCISC04.4. GLIiORNIA G(LG AOew(M "OKMCP" —aww ,G"„F, January 24 aw o ouox .w,arowx[` N + Fa E 1961 [OWARG MLTCCM[ L [ w a .... x. ainx.r IIc.Awo w.w[R Ax[a r wAna.+w. YIOx(V OOMN[V OAAICF Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer .•City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. 1 Dear Mr. Miller: We have prepared and enclose eight copies of proposed resolution of intention to issue bonds under Section 35402.1 of the Streets and Highways Code, which we understand from your corres- pondence with Mr. Bartle, of Stone and Youngberg, is to be adopted at the adjourned regular meeting on February 1, 1961. Will you please arrange to have sent to us an affidavit of ,posting notice resolution,_ The resolution sets the hearing for objections to said proceedings for the regular meeting of March 6, 1961. As previously observed in Mr. Bartle's letter of January 13, the notice (set forth on pages 3-4 of the enclosed resolution should be published k for two successive xeeks. namely, on Mondgys_Februa�6 anWdl It is necessary that the second publication be at least twenty days before the hearing. We sug&e_st that the form of notice be submitted to the San Luis Obl o County Telegram Tribune at once for setting it up in type, and seehUng you and us a proof for_checking as soon as_poaa.ihle_. If 'proof can be checked and publication made earlier, it might be that the publication could be made on Fridays, February 3 and 10. ORRICK. DAM LOUIST. HERRINGTON a SUTCLIFFE 2 January 24 Mr. Richard D. Miller 1961 We understand that prior to the adoption of the reso- lution on February 1, the City will (as required by said Section 35402.1) have contracted, or obtained options .for the purchase uf, or has obtained condemnation judgments covering more than 80% of the assessed value of all land, property and rights of way to be acquired. This will require the entry of any required con- demnation judgments prior to February 1, Some time will you please confirm the contents of your letter of January 4, 1961, to Mr. Bartle, relating to assessed valuations by a certificate of the auditor, in order _ that our transcript may be complete. Very truly yours, E n c s Edward E. Mitchell cc: Mr. Richard M. Bartle Mr. William M. Houser, Jr. STONE S YOUNGBERG Wxl[+9wOx[ MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS P14"+1°nbw�,s J. Cwwuft[ YDuxcw[wa x L Bwowx S[xJwnrx J. V°N 1311 FYSS BVIIOINO WBNwx Prcn+wo P. ONO.[ SAN FRANCISCO ♦ D+vo EX+wilsr'w DON M. Dnv�w VUNOx I I I. C°wn M1 1N[uA Jw. B1wIM1 M. N[Wn1N EVew6rr O W��uwn° January 12, 1961 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer 4' City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: The assessed valuation data for the Parking District has been forwarded to Mr. Rowley, who is going to draw up the resolution setting a hearing under the 80 per cent provision of the 1951 Law. He has been asked to have this ready for the council's action at its meeting of February 6th.. Mr. Rowley advises us that the notice of hearing must be published once a week for two weeks and that the hearing must be held at least twenty days after the second publication. Because February is a short month, there is no way of com- pleting the publication and notice period in time to hold the hearing at the March 6th council meeting. I have suggested that the proceedings be drawn to set March 13th as the hearing date. If there is no regular meeting that day and you would rather have the hearing on March 20th let us know. Otherwise, we shall proceed to set the hearing for March 13th. I have advised Mr. Rowley that the city will provide enough money in the bond issue to cover the estimated cost of the Pezzoni estate. If the court sets a higher price the city will either make up the difference from other funds or will de- fer purchase during Mrs. Pezzoni's lifetime. I advised him further that a parking lot could be developed at Site A without the Pezzoni property so that the entire district would be benefited without this acquisition. Did I make these statements accurately? Sincerely yours, STOA E 6: YO,UNGBERG Richard M. Bartle RMB: by cc: Mr. Nathan D. Rowley 0 4 January 4. 1961 Mr. Richard M. Bartle Stons and Youngberg 1314 Boss Building S.;a Francisco 4, California Dear Dick: In reply to your letter of December 27, 1960, I am forwarding to you certain information on assessed valuations obtained Iran Mr. Fitzpatrick today. defer- ring to Ordinance No. 86 (1958 Series) which was drafted by Orrick, the follow- ing valuations ropy -cant the latest equalized figures for the years Lodicuted: Parcel 1, Lot A Land $ 6,65U Improvements $5,160 Total $110810 1960-61 (including 35 x Roll 100' strip) NOTBt This is the Pezzoni parcel (Lillian C. Pesmmi) which we a:a not aequir- ;y; in$ immediately. elthwyh we have an option an it encumbered only by a life estate. The lady involved to about dgbty-four years old. We will acquire it me soon as wo can successfully complete the pending condemnation proceedings against her life interest. we do not with to hold up the acquisition of the other parcels until this can be completed. By the wry, we are not acquiring all of the above property. As you will note in examining the ordinance, the parking district pro- ceedings exclude a parcel of land in the Northwesterly corner of Lot 148 said Parcel amasuring 35 feet on Charm Street and 100 foot deep. The valuation above, however. is for the entire parcel. Parcel 2, Lot A Land $ 4,860 1936-59 Roll HOTS: This parcel is now owned by the city, and the money for its purchase woo advanced from the special off-street parking reserve fund. Parcel 3. Lot A Land $ 2,650 1958-59 Roll NOTE: This parcel is also owed by the city, and the money for its purchase was nlso advanced from the reserve fund. a Mr. Richard 11. Bortle January 4, 1961 Page Parking Lot D Land $20.100 ,Assessed to Irene 1960-61 J. Carpenter Roll Land $ 7,500 Assessed to Bernice B. McFadden 7 and Thelma B. Jean } Improvements $8.370 Assessed to Irons J. Carpenter $5.460 Assessed to Stan- dard Oil Company of California You will note that the total valuations represented above are $60,850.00, and we hav!c acquired or uill acquire immediately $49.040.00. This represents 80.59X of the total. and actually. the $11,810 total for Parcel 1. Lot A which is not being acquired at this [Lm should be reduced to reflect the 35 by 100 foot piece which is not within the district and which will not be acquired. The land valua- tion clone should be reduced by $1.330,000 «ecording to the City Assassorg ut111z- ing a square foot basis for the segregation. Under separate cover. I am sanding you sore late information on parking meter revenues. Sincerely yours. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer RUM: sac cc: Aillfan M. Mouser, Jr J. R. Fitzpatrick P,S. Incidently, time of the values listed above have changed for at least tour fiscal years. January 4, 1961 Mr. Richard M. Bartle Stme and Youngberg 1314 Russ Building San Francisco 4, California Dear Dick: As praised, here is supplemental information to that transmitted by my letter of December 17, 1960. Curb meter revenues for 1960 (page 7, Feustman report) totalled $39,851.50. 542 average amber of waters in service averaged $73.53 revenue for the year. Lot 1 Revenues totalled $4,017.98 for the year (page 9) with $772.00 non -meter revenue. Lot 2 totalled $4.915,510 lot 30 $4,302,78 with 9524.00 non -water revenue and lot 4, $992.93 and $264.00 nm-eater revenue. Grand totals were $14,229.50 and $1,560.00 non -meter revenue. Summery of financial experience for the first six months of the fis- cal year (page 6) is as follows: Gross revenue $21.482.50; Enforcement salaries $6,048.00; motor vehicle $375.00 and amortise cycles $600.00; subtotal $7.023.00 Collection $600.00; repairs and maintenance $3.728.24; repayment of meters and miscellaneous capital outlay $380.43, and employee retire- ment $1,150.00. Subtotals $12,881,67. Transfer to Off -Street Parking Reaerve: $14.600.83. Building rental and rental of monthly parking privileges: $844.00. 1 hope this will be helpful to you and we can continue to progress an the legal proceedings end sale of bands. Sincerely yours, Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer PLi jfT . January 4, 1961 Mrs. Lillian C. Pazzoni 1224 Chorro Street San Luis Obispo. California Dear Mrs. Pezzoni: The Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has authorised me to make e compromise offer in the amount of $12,500.00 for your life estate on that portion of your property being condemned by the city. As You knew, the city is ccndeeming all of your property except a par. eel 55 feet wide by 100 foot deep. This payment, of course, would be in addition to the balance due you for your remainder interest from the L. 6 H. Investment Company. This compromise offer is higher than our appraisal and made in the hopes of settling the pending law suit and, of course. will not be binding upon ur in the event the pending action goes to trial. przry truly yours. Fred M. Waters Mayor FM.:: smc cc: Richard Harris STONE S YOUNGBERG Owxiu Srpn[ MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS Rronwlro MNwru J.Cwwua.[ uxpa[wn Runn [.lwOwx B[xJuw., J. " Nun 1314 R V 35 B V I LD I N G Fowawo W Buwx[rr R¢xwwo n. GwOaa SAN FRANCISC:O ♦ Owno E.xwnnry pOn M. p,.vl[ Yuxon 1 131. EVERE T D VV!6 n Bwwwr M, M[WMax Ev[w[ir D. 'MV.na !ai dl n�1 V" ,` December 27, 1960 O' Ny Cef Y Mr. Richard D. Mille �E/� c�C Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: We have discussed your parking district project with Mr. Rowley and have a- lerted him to its present status. We understand that a stipulation has been filed in the major ;ondemnation suit but that a life estate remains unsettled on one of the sites. You have indicated that the property acquired accounts for more than 80 per cent of the assessed valuation of all property in the project but does not account for 100 per cent. Mr. Rowley is not too happy about proceeding under the 80 per cent provision of the 1951 Act and wants to be absolutely sure that every reasonable step has been taken to acquire 100 per cent. In order to hold the hearing under the 80 per cent provision he will need (and we should have for our information) the assessed valuation of all property involved in the district project, both acquired and unacquired. He will then prepare the proceedings for a determination that more than 80 per cent has been acquired and that the entire district is benefited by that 80 per cent. We are under the Impression that the remaining life estate parcel is not essential to the success of the project. The city intends to acquire this remaining land but might decide not to in case the condemnation judgment were too high. We should know clearly your Intentions as to this parcel and your views as to its importance to the project as a whole. As soon as this information is in Mr. Rowley's hands and we have had an oppor- tunity to discuss it with him it should be possible to prepare a time schedule and indi- cate an approximate sale date for the parking district bonds. Happy New Year. Sincerely yours, STONE & YOUNGBERG 'Richard M. Bartle RMB:bp cc: Mr. Nathan D. Rowley August 24, 1960 ' L. 6 H. Investaent Co. c/o C. C. Awsphroy 1144 Chorro Strost San Luis Obispo, California Rat "Agreasant and 'Option," dated March 2. 19s9 Dior Mr, ihcaparsy: In accordance with our "agrego of 0.1 optf.00" on the Pezzoni parcel, the City of Son Y.uis Obispo filed cw:iaeostlai action against Mrs. Passmi today. Said action was filed in the Superior Court and a notlea of lea pandons was recorded in the Councy "carder's Offica. Our spp^aiaor is completing hie eppcdtsal of tht value of the property, and I have dodo arroogwents with Mr. Pesami's attorney, Ar. Harris. to negotiate the valuation figure as soon as our appraisal is ess pleted. Id the event the negotiation&, are unrucceseful, 1+e will pro- ceed with the coudemation action. In the evwt year company does not feel we am ceaplying with the tar= of the "agreement and option," kindly notify = at your earliest aoavanienee. Very truly ymm, e f. William M. liouser, Jr. - City Attorney WHR: am cc: Richard Millar Jean Fitzpatrick ' °'� Pic &rd F Norris ATTOPN[Y AT L W .fa 9 BL'L 101 PRSH STREET �an [vi,ie Obis Po. Ca�i�ornia L:w[wTv 3 JBI3 March 7, 1960 Honorable Fred Waters Mayor City of San Luis Obispo City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mayor Waters: Mrs. Pezzont has asked me to advise you that she has been required to co to San Francisco to consult with her doctor, due to a serious condition in her health. She anticipates being back shortly after the 7th of March and she has indicated that she will be willing to meet with you, and other members of the City government, in order to discuss the matter of the disposition of her property on Chorro Street. I believe that we may be able to hold this meeting some time between the 7th of March and the 20th of March, unless her health takes a serious turn for the worse. In any event, I am hopeful that you will not take any action, with respect to any condemnation, prior to March 20th. Very truly yours, Richard F. Harris Attorney for Lillian Pezzont Mrs. Lillian Mraal LM ctorra Strott Sa Lott uilspo, GAliterrAm Do" Mrs. f.*aai: Tou will recall our Previous coweeostte.t is rapard to your property :a UPPrra Street And its po"Wo we is aaeseatiaa nth a downtown at!-ttrvec Pmrklea 14"lity. At the teas of arc smaller what, tit was, save" curt we would tot ugptbu later an to discos tbe matter, ad I Yew boas poclestly witty tar you and Mr. auCla W arrive at a ties mod plate for amob a ~is&. I Owe boom made saes peweewrm fret tkA City Csesctl mod sasYud�" of ohs ►IMSmyt eommity to du as with gue mote. ad I Coarse tbat voles I You from you prior to tad mart Covoell meeting as March 7. 1 will be a►leyd to rseaesud to tad couesil time it ial+ tees* aeadoesatlsa proceedings as year life tatemost. rinses be soa.sad then I stood wills" at no tar to got with y*o, but t bettors I Woe bees very Pmttat. ad ibm car to resolve this quest too aim way as the otbu. SiaatrOly Tsars. FRO M. YAYSta Kay" w aahard darrim Meai.*ra ai ca* city Guwril STONE & YOUNGBERG DaCwwLlaL[ YO �� ^. ,. MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS RI wo Fl p..wri[ RrPnC piwwx ......O p[wJau�w J. pauw \ c,J ��� 131a RU55 pUILGING C E�w.wO Wpuwlrec. D,ulo f l✓ 5AN FRANCISCO 4 Eowlw W[LrVa Jw OOw M.OAVIa /� YIJKON 1-1314 �� � � Evc[cir D. NlLuua pwww� M-N[ww,.x (J January 13, 1960 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: I have discussed the setting of the Parking District hearing with Mr. Rowley and the following procedure has been agreed upon: Your regular meeting of January 16 will be adjourned to 5 p,m., February 1 (Wednesday). The resolution setting the hearing will be adopted at this adjourned regu- lar meeting. The date of the hearing will be established as March 6, the regular council meeting. The notice of hearing will be published on or before February 6 so that the second publication could be completed by February 13. The hearing would be held on March 6 and, assuming all details can be worked out, the resolution issuing the bonds will be adopted at the con- clusion of the hearing, setting a date early in April for receipt of bids. This procedure undoubtedly will be satisfactory for you, and Mr. Rowley assures us that the necessary resolution will be available prior to February 1. You should give some thought to the probable date on which bids will be received for the purchase of the bonds. April 3 will be a logical date since it is a regular meeting. It is, however, the Monday following Easter. If the council is to meet April 10, this would be a better day. A bond issue of the size presently con- templated does not require a special meeting but you should consider the possibility of a special � ,in�the morning on April 5 or 6. At the moment we shall aim for April 3 but a change at some time. RMB:bp��b. ,:1�. cc: Mr. N. Row ey Mr. Wm. Houser Sincerely yours, STON 15 YOUNGBERG Richard M. Bartle • • rZ CITY OF SAN LMS ONIM, CALIFORNIA 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California November 19, 1959 Honorable Mayor and City Council San Luis Obispo California Gentlemen: On wedaeeday evening, November 18, 1"9, the Citizens' Committee on Downtown Traffic Congestion met with a group from the retail merchants' division of the Chamber of Commerce and also certain members of the Chamber Parking and Traffic Committee. The Chamber representatives had been invited to attend this Heating by your Citizens' Committee, the primary purpose of the meeting being to discuss a proposal to enforce parking meters on Thursday evenings, This suggestion had came to the Citizens' Committee from both businessman and shoppers and was based on the theory that enforcement of the parking motors encouraged turnover of customers and was a deterrent to employees and businessmen tying up available customer parking. The result of the discussion with the Chamber group was en- tirely negative on this proposal, and as far as the Citizens' Ceem?tree is con- cerned, we are dropping the matter. There was also some discussion on the loss of 11 parking meter spaces on the east side of Chorro between Hersh and Higuera as a result of the recent loading zone Installation, but the Committee pointed out that this sane had been installed on a air-monchs' trial basis. The objection to the loading zone was made primarily by two of those attending. One claimed substantial love of business since the installation of the awns, although the group pointed out that business activity had fallen off somewhat during the past few make anyway. with the lose of the 11 spaces on Chorro, however, there was considerable dis- cussion on the need for subsitut Lon of additional off-street parking facilities as planned far in the parking district program. In answer to a specific question. Richard Miller, Administrative Officer, stated the Council's position of not wishing to proceed immediately with the eondsmnatice of Mre. Pezzoni's property on Chorro Street near Marsh unless abo voluntarily gave up bar life interest. Mr. Miller said the Comcil felt differestly about condemning a citizen and forcing her to owe from her hom steed than It did about proceeding against business buildings. Several of those present were quits w met at this and felt that this was a change in policy from the previous Council ami that there was at least a moral commit- ment for the Council to proceed with all pans of the parking district. This was the basis on which the parking asanaammt district had been sold, according to the group. It was strongly urged that the Citizens' Committee recommend to the City Council that immediate steps be taken to acquire the Pezzoni property, especially in view of the increasing needs for parking In the downtown step, the theory of the greatest good for the greatest number, the recent loam of parking spaces at the curb in connection with the Chorro Street loading zone and traffic signals to Marsh Street, and the fact that the City had beeu very patient and had been attempting to acquire the Peazoni property for many years. L Letter to Honorable Meyor r=i City Council After hearing the thoughts Committee recommends that Pezzcni's life interest in nan be completed. -7- November 19, 1959 of the businessmen group, the Cuencil'e Citizens' serious comideratiom be given to condemning Mrs. the noar future so that the over-311 perking progrc= Sincerel y yo urs, JGM SO!@1 Citizens' Committee ou Downtown Traffic Congestion • LL:ME i 81 3-31'^"•� Guarantee No, 65848 81 ]-01 Fee 250.00 Title Insurance and Trust Company a corporation of Los Angeles, California, herein called the Company, copy does hereby guarantee COPY THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO T�or whoa bensgt andd,, tertian this Guarantee is issued, in a sum not to exceed One iouaaned and no7foL -------------------------------- that, as appears from an examination of the public records in relation to the record title titleis vested in BERNICE BROOKS MCFADDEN and T'N6I.1�flt �BOo� JEAE, 0 are and share alike as to Parcel 1; and IRENE J. CARPENTER., as to Parcel 2. FREE FROM ALL ENCUMBRANCES, EXCEPT: 1. General and special county and city taxes for the fiscal year 1959-1960 a 11eo, but not yet payable. 2. An agreeraeut relating to a party wall on the northeasterly line of Parcel 2, extending 110 feet from Monterey Street southeasterly and at right angles with Monterey Street executed by Mary J. Love and H. ii. Carpenter, dated June 27, 198 and recorded June 28. 1916 in book 121 at page 476 of Official Records. 3. A lease of ground floor apace approximately 22 feet wide by 54 feet deep, divided into 3 roams, situate in what is known as the bank building on southeast corner of Monterey and Court Street, dated September 10, 1925 executed by H. ii. Carpenter as lessor and The Western Union Telegraph Company, as lessee for the term of 5 years from August 1, 1926, upon the terms, covenants and conditions thereto provided recorded October 10, 1925 in book 2 at page 347 of Official Records. 4. An agreement relating to a party wall on tie northeasterly line of Parcel 2 executed by Olive S. Martin and d. B. Martin, her husband and Irene J. Carpenter, dated January 15, 1931, recorded February 27, 1931 in book 105 at page 435 of Official records, said wall extending 20 feet from the southeasterly end of 110 foot party wall described and agreed upon between Mary J. Lowe and H. ti. Carpenter by instrument dated June 27, 1918, Page 1 recorded June 28, 1918 in book 121 at page 47o of,Deeds and being continuation of and in same course as said 110 foot wall and being at right angles with Monterey Street. 5. A lease dated March 7, 1940, executed by Irene J. Carpenter as lessor and Standard Oil Company, as lessee, for the terra and upon the terms, covenants and conditions provided for in an unrecorded lease between the same parties therein referred to, recorded May 10, 1940 in book 274 at page 222 of Official :records, covering the following described land: Beginning at a point where the northerly line of Higuera Street intersects the easterly line of Court Street, and running thence northwesterly along the easterly line of Court Street 100 feet; thence at right angles easterly 72 feet more or less; thence at right angles southeasterly along the wesarly line of the lot owned by Clara J. Brooks, 100 feet to the northerly line of Figuers Street; thence southwesterly along the northerly line of Higuera Street, 72 feet more or less to the point of beginning. 6. A lease dated May 3,1950, executed by Irene J. Carpenter, as lessor and Standard Gil Company of California, a corporation, lessee, for the term and upon the terms, covenants and conditions provided for in an unrecorded lease between the same parties therein referred to, recorded June 14, 1950 in book 566 at page 34 of Official Records, covering the following described land: Beginning at a point where the northerly line of Higuera Street intersects the easterly line of Court Street, and running Cnence northwesterly along the easterly line of CourtStreet 100 feet, thence at right angles northeasterly 72 feet more or less, thence at right angles southeasterly along the westerly line of the lot owned by Clara J. Brooks, 100 feet to t,,e northerlyy line of Cliguers Street, thence southwesterly along the rortherly line of Higuera Street, 72 feet more or less, to the point of beginning. 7. A lease of Parcel 1, dated February 3, 1955, executed by Bernice McFadden and Thelma S. Jean, as lessor and Standard Oil Company of California, a corporation, as lessee, recorded A ril 7, 1955 in book 799 at page 157 of official Records, for the terra and upon the terms, covenants and conditions provided for in an unrecorded lease between the some parties t.,erein referrer: to. DESCRIPTION: PAe:CEL 1: That portion of Block 17 in the City of San Luis Obispo, Page 2 county of San Luis Obispo, state of California, sccordinp to the map thereof recorded May 1, 1978 to book A at page lob of Maps in the office of the county recorder of said county, described as follows: beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly line of Monterey Street with the southwesterly line of fans Street as conveyed to the City of San Luis Obispo by deed dated ,.i05 .. • July."Da.-U-Z7. j9.d book J .at page la6 of iltada; thence along the southwesterly line of said Oaos Street South 36. 10' E at 129 feet 5 inches to the most easterly corner of the land conveyed to 011"-B. Asir"' Martin by dead dated Julx_30, 1928, recorded July.39.-14Z8 �p iwok 54-_l�S_paV , Q3_.g€.Daad6 the true point of beginning; thence along the southeasterly fine of the said land conveyed to Olive B. Martin, South 54' 06' West 60 feet 7 inches to the northeasterly line of the land conveyed to_YssbaiPico V and Viryj alA Pica ._by deed dated August 7, 1871.. seeorded August 29,_1871 i& book C_stpage 409 of Deed&; thence soutfi"Star y along the northeasterly line of the lead conveyed by said last mentioned deed, to the northwesterly line of Higuera Street as conveyed to the City of San Luis Gbispo by deed dated October 9, 1889, recorded January 11, 1890 in book 7.at page 5 of Deeds; thence northeasterly along the north- westerly line of said ;liguera Street to the southwesterly line of Cone Street aforementioned; thence northwesterly along the said southwesterly line of Coos Street to the true point of beginning. PAECEL 2: That portion of Elock 17 in the City of San Luis Obispo, county of San Luis Obispo, state of California, accordingg to the map thereof recorded May 1, U78_in-book-A.a.t page 168 of Maps in the office of the county recorder of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly line of Monterey Street with tine northeasterly line of Court Street as widened by deed to the_City._af San Luis_Lbispa slated June 4, 1877, recorded Octsper 11. 1877 in book J at page 232 of official Records; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly lane of cbnterey Street, 72.55 feet, more or less, to the most westerly corner of the land conveyed to D.W. James, by dead dated August 17, 1891, recorded.Auguat 29,1071 in bopk.C_at page 413 of Official Records; thence south- easterly along the southwesterly line of said land to the north- wester)yy line of Higuera Street as conveyed to the City of San Luis Obispo by deed dated October 9, 1989 recorded January 11, 1890 in book 7 at page 5 of Deeds; thence southweserly along said north- westerly line of Higuers Street, 72 feet more or less to the north- easterly line of Court Street aforementioned; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line of Court Street as widened to the point of beginning. Page 3 Tine necessary and proper parties to be named defendant in an action to condemn the title to said land are: BERNICE BROCKS MaFADDEN and husband of Bernice Brooks McFadden, if married. THEL.*!A BROOKS JEAN and husband of T:.elma Brooi:s Sean, if married. IRENE J. CARPENTER and nusband of Irene J. Carpenter, if married. "Any and all parties known to plaintiff or to which an examination of the premises will disclose as having or claiming any interest in sai-' land" The address of the owners of said land, used for tax purposes, as disclosed by the 1959-1960 tax rolls are as follows: BERNICE BRCGKS 14cFADDEN and TIXLMA BPfGCKS JEAN c/o Bernice Brooks McFadden, 177 McFadden Road, Salinas, California. ll:ENE .1. CARPENTER, 1631 Morro street, San Luis cbispo, California IT IS Assumed for the purpose of this guarantee that the matters referred to in exceptions 1 to 7 inclusive will not be af£ect*d by such action to condemn. Yap 4 c„a.eaa rero BI A 5-55 This guarantee is issued subject to the following conditions and stipulations which are hereby made a part of said guarantee: 1. The liability of the Company under this guarantee shall in no case exceed, in all, the actual loss of the persons for whose benefit and protection it is issued, and in no case shall such total liability exceed the amount stated on the first page hereof. 2. This guarantee does not include an examination of or a report on: (a) Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records or by the records of any taxing agency. (b) Mining claims, reservations in patents, water rights, claims or title to water. (e) Any laws, governmental acts or regulations, including but not limited to wiling ordinances, restricting, regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land or any improvement thereon, or any caning ordinances prohibiting a reduction in the dimensions or area, or separation in ownership, of any lot or parcel of land; or the effect of any violation of any such restrictions, regulations or prohibitions. 3. The following terms when used in this guarantee mean: (a) "public records": those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters relating to ,aid land; (b) "taxing agency: the State and each county, city and county, city and district in which said land or some part thereof is situated that levies taxes or assessments on real property. In Witness Whereof, Title Insurance and Trust G±mpany has caused its corporate nameA and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on October 9, 1959 at r :.)U a.m. TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY SEAL by i a o�i-eGL�ALt_ / PRESIDENr Attest AIL1itaut SEcarn'ull August 6, 1959 miles Cenaiaghm 6ardin God Qaminghm 139 Avbaty Strost Salinas, California Re: Mayaddon-dean Property Door Mr. Us wish to rmiad you that you awpectsd to give us a reply by August 1, 19590 to our ¢mrproalse offer of $56x.WsDv1 for the subject property We could appreciate it if you could notify us of your client sod her stators' feelings so that we can proceed with the oondsonation if necessary. As we explained to you, the offer is higher than our appraisal and would not be used in the went of litigation. Very truly yours, laua H H. Wm a, JR. City Attorney UWUcvb cc: Richard D. Millar c. i July 6, 1959 Mr. Barry McDonald c/o A. V. Muller Attorney at Law wickenden Building San Luis Obispo, California Re: Irons J. Carpenter Parcel Dear Mr. McDonald: She City Council has authorized me to offer to Irene J. Carpenter the sum, of $1".DDO.00 as a compromise for the acquisition of her property fronting Monterey Street, Court Street and Signers Street. As you understand, this is a compromise offer and will not be binding upon the City in the event it is necessary to litigate this matter. I wish to thank you for your cooperation to date and hope that this matter can be settled with the least inconvenience and expense to both you and the City. Very truly yours, PRED M. MASERS Mayor rvb y gM 'l m F m 0 to N S ^ � 0 ObW" N S oGN � � m lo. a� g8pw am OONd� E pa � �ao 1D 6 FK dpp 'l O � j GGGY Y L� M eel V ° eg mb m m p 0 IY+ y t� pEEqq N SSbii o mG�y � �Q��� qq am •' p P 4+m m -591 �p gSq•i1 MA� S x b �dS tim ��o,aS� act p� � N QarRS1 ° w ggc a�-' R s 1 m fl ll ig3+ Y °i � 3 ~V • Q~ � � � � O 0 � C 0 6 p y pp ■ $ Y V 8 � i� ✓ ryas n r � mg g� w �y. °'g5, gYp a��i��o• r°yggo ° mpg° ��ag;y pp gg s R y��R aem pf Y' V 5ary+c���•S-•-Y � i �� iS 33 w r gyp(, �0+ bO �J 9+n� �yy �Jo $-�o �40 4 mr °�,p� �x dG6 u4p'SRfo 04 A �2m om9 sr g +' S=g.°� Y0Y �1o° 4"1 g$m al�gom �� S o oe Cra °pFpe Y�i S°d"°om owr �`��$$S fir. �Ym oy44 91 n �� 6'0��6�0.� W 7,41 �ravp�°. c %O p�p.. � N e � � ° � � y� � & p� � � rrrreeEeo��ii � � +yf�• Py33 M �>. �O p �i 1 e\ �f yy o� ONMO •fig °lc O Pi■ D7mm OC � Ny ✓�<�i QO rry4� y Y �O'O pO7 n• O o K8 N V~H o C rr ° O n yM•�A'I �ew Y p .0 p g� ry6'�bf ��P 6 i1 yM •j�� J ° �1p+��Fp`�� r.��6 `� b r � 5 wp V 'J �JI�+y. 'A ��xl p�p� �O�Y�� IC F�•*b �61 r'-' ° ��$Fw 5r•a78.i a"r iS�,°�R.x°� Ymw "a�i °q ° °cook• �h.°. p� o��� mM0 �''N wry� p ~ � O b N ✓O nnO �y'$^ N OO,, ✓• h t•�6T�i pp6� � e� •f r O Se. mi O R.~ �O pyO0 ��IIO if 0p,°7. Pf yOpP M 4 mmpq 1-, eryyerr O{ 3 e�i� m op `r'a 3�a '-0S 0 i Qb gr y •ay g ® C r $ m p �p {{�j�� o ' •, � m N 1� O 'f n w O � D p Y m E � O A r ° A e ° 0 7 e°f � � ~ � ° ~ ~ ti � a Y ,• • �O V p �30 YS0H abN aY. 6H JH MRN p AF+ l'�l�b^9 �a`a � l'. S�Kv �m� mo m d ry •ate `� �,m. ,An��µ� g o o b N K m 0 a a H i1 " O R l yyy e R 00 e:3 ro p 7 a O COt e ti 'uO '� i�1� �e�e•N� '� � Jv � U D5666- g 04 E 8hC~� a -TOtl o 7 n M m m m a na0i Al a �'C" •'s C E 7o o � J N RS 6au 08 M �� O 1p• � gas& 0�1 9� F`~ M OA m m c•'i�t O mm G rO/ @ '�"7 �{ ey a, �V am° OAM O C �T � y �J V � •.. O N�C e m O •f 'O RM N R µ m dl O o 's0 LDSt. gm �j ? °mm5a W to cl F' O m W N A 7 V Mm p aa�t� Igo '1 R° O 8 Y 2yµ ��1 pnal �'" N 8 •f i air G ya0 O.1 ryaN Im+� o "pN m � new a4 RA m a H � 1+ Qr. � o aroma Il a m a °Ni •a eo ro �� � ��a� oN O IT 's �"+ � m?n 9 `22pCy' •GQG 5T � '(Tye a e � b b� � 'pm G G MNGf��syy � lObyl, t- m O p� m m� �� y7 R {�F..y1+� u W .� O • e� e • � �ppR+ � � TTTe"' y � O Am F•ry �� �'p5• ��Q 0 �� tmn 3 `i N p ro n S RPr a g0.2 a r A Y F 0 : u4 ~ O•` oSc cµ �� ❑ � �F+Cy,e• � a yM ypg'vtSm��0 " OPF Cya ONO r".15W NbM O h�A r�r�� 0 3bm •SS � `G rrR� � �� °C 0. mery oF° ryz ". a s pyz p a m �i 6bm o 3 mO� °C�p�• �oSO �p���J �°a e„S,� C�f m =M r3r 69 M° 7 Gp B M M 0 ry O O 5 �00 I R r C 0 jr ir o 3 " �+ a pr -W0� N p yyyp� w m" ipmfC v� S ° O °Q Yl 'O N F+ v GO 00 O 0 0 m x O '! N Qa . f Fy P e�rr pp c� C FF P O r1 e� O~�; 0°���OOf VWt�sNp O6 ��eY, � m t� All 9 - O ff6ff a S � �F H 03 A 0 04 if O Gj Q V a °it aah' ff° - O M. �f PCa ��s 'nS 5 aNF'DK S o 5 P tlaY 7 y e+ qgu ,°y m o° 25 `o b� ndv -D P ry�• ■ GG �ryf e�s Y V Y S �y ry fn t t 0� M M Y °� » y O q •. O O 040 �p» ° a on ° � Ke YF��A Mao' lk m�`r G°a°sY m �f o g �si° 6 $�M Y� O S 9 D 'roi O M� FIT G ° ° O& o ° C � ■yGN C � a 4 S OO OS » M 9 » rym W • pW z ~S nm K Sfi �'°1h ��• c0 1.8 3¢ QQ�eY. OO CVF pO On pq� u7 °.N SY 180-1 a a too ill illy O0p0' bra m 8®p «9v fi y° Rag 4 April 14, 1959 Richard P. Barris Attorney at Law 1101 Marsh Street San Luis Obispo, California Deer fir. Harris: Some time ago you asked me for certain information in regard to the City's optlon oa the Pezzoni property on Chorro Street. Our option ,,rovidea for a purchass price of $38,199.68 for the property lave a pie" measuring 35 feet On Chorro Street and 100 feet deep. Our 9rice was figured on the basis of $2.72 per square foot for 14,044 square feet. The other 3,i00 square foot parcel would therefore be worth $9,520.00 or a total purchase price of $47,719.68. We under - stead this has not all bsem paid sad cost tue %maphroys sad Landtekv will ow,,, $42,500.00 'a the eveac as, kesaoai gives up her life intsreet. This would enamt to $2.422 per square foot. Therefore, under the terms of the ;,:tloa we would have to nap 6% on $34,014.57 (14,044 square feat at $1.422) from the data the life interest were rslinqu'_shed to the date wo exercised the option. Tu any event, wa will pay the Hv:ap4reys' and Leadecks' 5% on $4.185.11 (the diffcronce bctweon 338.199.66 and $34,Oi4.51) or our share of the money already advanced by then to Mr. Main sad originally by Mr. Main to Mrs. %%zoo'. t wilt he happy to answer aey other questious which may arise in this matter. Sincerely your*, RICHAR0 0. MILLBR Administrative Officer 8ffi!: ca _aMh 18, 1959 • • Anald 4. Hiller 2324 Johnson "vama San Luja Obispo, California Dear Ion% The foll owing is Sn answer to your inquiry regarding the. eityms pro�ra.'o of oft'•- street parking, costs imolved, ;iethods of financing and so on. One of the three cietered lots currently in operation was nuxchaeed before my arrival in San Luis Obispo, but it is xV understanding that this lot as nurchased with moneys actwsulated in the off-street narking reserve. Other lots purchased mince that time have also been purchased in this manner. The way the procedure has worked is thins The city deposits all parking water receipts in the general fund, as required by city ordinance. After deducting gore amounts needed for enforcement of the meters, collection of moneys, operation and maintenance of the meters, counting and deposit of the moneys, retirement contributiore for employees engaged in the above activities and other incidental costs including purchase of aoters, any balance is then tranaferred to the off-street parking mserw•e. When sufficient mnoys have accumulated in the reserve, the city had in the past purchased additional o^f-etroot harking facilities. In ono or two cases, some temporary loans have been made from other general funds of the city on an interest -free basis and repaid as soon as the off-strost parking reserve built up again. The cost of parking lot number one eontdning 123 spaces and located at the corner of Palm and Korro Streets is believed to have been about w45,000 for tho land itself. This purchase was cunbined with the site for the city library, and it is therefore difficult to eenarate the combined figure on an exact basis. The other two lots which have been acquired and placed in operation during my ourvim with the city have been parking lot number too, located near the corner of Broad and Marsh Streets, which coat o67,826.08 clue the recent contract for enlargement which ran "2,213.80 or a grand total of $70,039,88, Parking lot number three which runs parallel to Morro Street and extends from Palm to i,ontorey and contains 64 spaces coat `:912922.h2 including construction. u)uring the Foust year or Lao, the city has favored a marking district under the 1951 Act in response to widespread interest in such a program evidenced by the signature of more than half the property owners in the downtown perking di.strir.•i.. Surner's of the netition agreed to an ad valorem tees levy on any anou+nts YIOOCV" . for bond redemptlen and interest and not forthcaming from parking meter rscei.pl:_ Revenue bonds would be sold to finance the acquisition and improvement of time lots. The district proides that bond interest and redemption payments will be made after taking operation and maintenance mcpensss out but that mnforcement expenses would be mturned to the city only if sufficient moneys remained to so eo. Under the zrking district, two additional lots are proposed. mass are the half block hehind the Pnderson Hotel with the exception of the obis;, Theater and the bar at t!:c. corner of Oses and Oonterey Streets. This lot would provide 95 spaces. The other lot is located at the corner of Chorro and Pacific Streets and would include 65 spaces. ilamh 2, 1959, option, mould )rive, expired on two parking lot properties, manly, the present Miley customer parking lot at Cloorm and Pacific and the 25 foot strip running alongside the 3as Company office which would evemmally be used for an in and Out driveway for the parking lot. Rather than allow the options to expire, or to enter into a lease 'otter to Donald Q. Hiller -2- ilarch 1;% 7.959 purchase alreenont for tuo years vhiah would have required payment of six norce,it interest and taxes on both of those nroperties, the City Council recrntly decided to exercise the options, and we should be receiving the deeds on these two properties by the end of this month. The other property involved is a portion of the Lillian "ezzoni parcel facing Chorro Street adjacent to the Riley narking lot, i:r. Theo 11. Ilai.no had p,achased this property from Ars. Peazoni, subject to a life interest and had given the City an option on the property for wprrmimately $38,000.00. If the city exercised the option at this time and Hrs. Yezzond retained her life interest, we would have to put up the money but would not gain possession of the property because of the life interest. 'lhe Ifunphreys and Landecks of Riley's Dept. Stare agreed to purchase Mr. 11aino's Interest in this property and Rive the city an additional option of 18 months. This would take sons of the immediate nressurs off the Council as far es a decision at this tires is concerned. The information above is a brief resume of the city's narking program. If you desire further information, please do net hesitate to call on me. S4noerbly yours, `I Vit 10 D. MILLER Administrative officer RR11ce ce- City Council YOU, MAY RETAIN THIS COPY FOR YOUR FILE5. f- 0 ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS S* Luis Obispo 3 u- Exrow No. !mil TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY: Date: March 2, 1959 On or before close of escrow we xX Will hand you the total sum of 81 which you will deliver when you obtain a deed to the land herein described, and when you can issue Your usual form Owner's policy of title insurance with liability of 8 I1,4(70.0� .,The Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 6, and the Northeasterly 15 feet of Lot 7, in Block 100 of the Mission Vineyard Tract, in the city of San Luis Obispo, county of San Luis Obispo state of California, according to map received March 8, 1873 in the official county records of said County. Excepting therefrom any portion thereof included within the lines of Marsh Street as widened. showing title vested in CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SUBJECT ONLY TO: (IiCurrent taxes for the fiscal year 1958-1959. (2) Covenants, conditions, restrtol inn= and public utility easements of record, provided said easements do at exceed six feet in width and arc along the rear or one side line of said land, or are along the rear and one aide line of said land. It is understood that the eetal consideration being paid for the land here- in described is $11,400.00, the balance of the funds to be deposited is made up as followst SALES PRICE $11,400.00 Interest 6% - 4-4-56 - 3-1-59 1,989.30 'j�r�RR-r-a1 25 feet frontage 81.50 Pro -rated taxes 4-4-56 to 6-30-56 Taxes year 1956, 75 feet frontage: $488.83 CCounty 625 Total 35W.W 25 feet frontage 181.69 Taxes year 1957 County $149.16 City 56.25 Total 188.91 Taxes first half 195 Elgty $jj. C 93.52 11v. 9d] T/��a,�� age •Va�Y ?J,a.q-3. Deliver title insurance policy •r • Instruct Recorder to mail as•r• . Start search of title at once. I pay 110 CRARGIRS. GENEM PROVISIONS All funds received in this escrow shall be deposited with other escrow funds in a general escrow account or amounts of Title Insurance and Treat Company, with any State or National bank doing business in the state of California, and may be transferred to any other such general escrow account or accounts. All disbursements shall be made by check of Title Insu . awe mid Trust Company. Aay commitment made in writing to Title Insurance and Trust Company by a bank, treat company, insurance company, or building and loan or savings and low association, to deliver its check or fund. into this escrow may, in the sole discretion of Title Insurance and Trust Company, be treated as the equivalent of a deposit herein of the amount thereof. All adjustments to be made on a basis of 30-day month. Recordation of any instruments delivered through this escrow, if necessary or proper in the issuance of the policy of title insurance called for, is authorised. No examination or insurance as to the amount or payment of real or personal property tares is required unless the real pproperty tax is payable nn or before the date of the policy of title insurance. Execute on behalf of the parties hereto, form assignments of interest in any insurance policies (other than title insurance) called for herein and forward them upon close of exrow to the agent with the request, first, that insurer consent to such trans. fer or attach loss -payable clause or make such other additions or corrections as may have been specifically required herein, and second, that the agent thereafter forward such policies to the parties entitled to them. In all acts in this escrow relating to fire insurance, including adjustments, if any, you shall be fully protected in •seaming that each such policy is in force and that the necessary premium therefor has been paid. Time is of the essence of these instruction.. If this escrow is not in condition to close by p�eril 2 1!52 my party who then shall have fully complied with his instructions may, in writing, demand tRe return o�his money an property; but if none have complied, no demand for return thereof shall be recognized until five days after the escrow holder shall have mailed copies of such demand to all other parties at their respective addreaxa shown in the escrow instructions. If no such demand is made, close this escrow as soon as Possible. Any amendment of or au lement to any instructions must be in writing. Signatgig•- H F. �t',ddrese Telephone ✓�. f At•. y _ s Oar Signature Address Telephone e+,City Clerk San Luis Ob1ap4 California Title Insurance and Trust Company: Datd{Sre , 1959 1 have read and approve the foregoing instructions. On or before close Of 98croW [ We Will hand Youa deed to the land herein described• which you will deliver when you can issue the policy of title insurance called for andwhan you hold for account the sum of $25,337.94, less charges. l$ * a w. '✓1 k A � . , The foregoing GENERAL PROVISIONS are hereby incorporated in them instructions. Pay all encumbrances of record necessary to place title in the condition called for. 1 will hand you any funds and instrweent= required for such purpose. Deliver title insurance policy to purchasers Instruct Recorder to maild•ed to purchaser. Begin search of title at once. I pay$sCTOW fee $77.00, policy fee $155.00, drawing and recording dead $4.50, estimated, and internal revenue staWs $28.05. Signature Address Telephone G,G. Humphrey Harbert Landeck Signature Address Telephone Y Humphrey +ee • TELEPHONE CONNECTIONS • I� • TnEo. M. MAINO C4aN / CO.IwdOE 142A MILL STREET SAN LU IS OBISPO. CALIFORNIA February 26, ICSC City of San Luis Obispo City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Gentlemen; `Lith reference to your purchase of Lot 14 and portions of Lots 15, 10 and 11 In Block 100, Mission Vineyard Tract, City of San Luis Obispo, we submit the follovinq for your Information; Parcel contains - - - - - - 14,046 square ft. Agreed purchase price - - - $ 2.72 square ff. Total purchase price - --$38,205.. 12 Payment to be made to: Lilliam Pezzoni - - $34,023.00 •- Theo. M. Vaino - - $ 4, 182.12 Total - - - - - - - $38,205.12 Very truly yours, Theo. M. Maino of cc: T I t le Insurance and Trusf Company CITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER C. C. Hulpbrey Harold F. Kjaerbye Robert H. Peters Merlyn Carpenter San Luis Obispo, California Gentlemen: OBISPO 1 February 26, 1959 In accordance with that certain 'Option for Sale and Purchase of Real Property" between yourselves and the City of San Luis Obispo, dated March 22, 1957, you are hereby given notice of exercise of said option by the City of San Luis Obispo. Escrow will be opened with the Title Insurance and Trust Company on Monday, March 2, 1959, and the agreed upon purchase price shall be deposited within ten days thereafter. Reference is made to paragraphs 4, subsection a through f, for the terms and conditions of the escrow. Sincerely yours, RICHARD D. HILLER Administrative Officer RDM:cs Noticye to ercise Option received: C. C. Htmphrey Merlyn Carpenter ~ 1144 Chorro, San Lui Obispo, Calif. 1127 Chorto, San Luis Obispo, Calif. Date: February27 , 1959 Date: .;/ - j e 7 , 1959 /�,,F;i/ 1'-I narora r. nd ne r�rye 986 Monterey, San Lui.a Obispo, Calif. 1959 Robert H. Peters 1126 Chorro, San Luis Obispo, Calif. Date: ' ,r °fix. , 1959 CITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OBISPO February 26, 1959 Theo M. Maino 2238 South Broad Street San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mr. Maino: In accordance with that certain "Option for Sale and Purchase of Real Property" between yourself and the City of San Luis Obispo, dated May 6, 1957, you are hereby given notice of exercise of said option by the City of San Luis Obispo. Escrow will be opened with the Title Insurance and Trust Company on Monday, March 2, 1959, and the agreed upon purchase price shall be deposited within ten days thereafter. Reference is made to paragraph 4, subsection (a) through (f), for the terms and conditions of the escrow. Sincerely your*__,��11 i+—J ,% —1hAt, RICNARD D. MILLER Administrative Officer ROM: cs cc- Title Insurance and Trust Company J. H. Fitzpatrick Notice to Exercise Option received: Theo M. Maino Dater a 7 1959 0 February 26, 1959 C. C. Humphrey Dorothy Rhsuphrey Herbert Lnndeck Lucille Landeck Dear Mr. and Mrs. Humphrey and Mr. and Mrs. Landeck: In aecordance with that certain "Option for Sale and Purchase of Real Property" between yourselves end the City of San Luis Obispo, dated May 6. 1957, you are hereby given notice of exercise of said option by the City of San Luis Obispo. Escrow will be opened with tLe Title Insurauce and Trust Cmpany on Monday, March 2, 1959, and the agreed upon purchase price shall be deposited within ton days thereafter. Reference is made to paragraph b, subsection (a) through (f), for the terms and conditions of the escrow. Sin rely yours, Rican D. KILLER Administrative Officer ROM: cs cc: Title Insurance and Trust Company J. H. Fitzpatrick Notice to Exorcise Option Received: C. C. Humphrey Harbart Landeck Date: , 1959 Data: % — �. b' — , 1959 Dorothy Hwpbrey Sae la Landeck Date: l"9 Datat v7 0 1959 • 0 February 26, 1959 C. C. Humphrey Dorothy Humphrey Herbert Landeck Lucille Lsndeck Door Mr. and Mrs. %mhrey and Mr. and Mrs. Landeck: In accordance with that certain "Option for Sale And Purcbaaa of Real Property" between youTsolvsa and the City of San Luis Obispo, dated Hay 6. 1957, you are hereby given notice of exercise of said option by the City of Sam Luis Obispo. Sscrow will be opened with the Title insurance and T:ust Company on xoaday, March 2, 1959, and the agreed upon purchase price &hall be deposited within tan days thareafter. Reference ie Made to paragraph 4, subsection (a) tbrongh (f), for the term And conditions of the escrow. ":CA cc: Title Insurance and Trust Company J. H. Fitzpatrick 9Utiaa to baaelas Opt&va Roceived: (Ld,�✓-/iUu— C. Dntst1959 Siac?tely Tomas 110"M o. MSLLU Adsiaistrative Minor Herbert Landeck Data: 1959 n paremaw YAW" Lucille Lomdock onto: — YFS , 1959 Dato: , 1959 • R FITZ AND McLLNN N. [ OW IN'IT., C. P. A. CENTi PIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS •NON[ 00[OTNY N. Ni LI N N, C. P. P, I'S N.A.. Ji [[T LI�[wi. J-3 J11 SAN LUISOBISPO, CALIFORNIA February 25, 1959 COST OF RILEYS PARKING LOT AND INPROVEYENTS Land 22.568.53 Improvements R. McGray 2,861.79 Total Cost 25.43o.32 stl.� The above costs are in agreement with Rileys records, and invoices coveriig the above are on tile. February 3, 1959 Niles Cunningham Hardin and Curminpham 359 Auburn Stnry^t `>alims, California f'e s f �cPaddws -Jean Property :ear ex. Curminghaas Fleased be advised that tpe offer ma9a in our letter of Januery 11�, 1959, to wits U9.347.00o is the appraised value of the property. Isessuch as tpsm money to be uaed to purctwe the property must came from bcad gales pur3: .t to the FarkinE :,istrict LA�w of 1951 (Section 18 :art D, ,treats and Sigbusyss Code) l would be willing to raoasmes,i to the City Council that we pay 03,319.00 for the property If your clients would be willing to enter into a contract or option pursuant to 9action 35400 of the "treats and i:ighwsys Code. She anticipated time necessary to acquire the balance of the property and sell the bonds would be am year. I would appreciate a reply in this matter at your earliest conve:jlenee. .sincerely yours. klcr;i,RD A..411j" Administrative Officer RDMsos cc- Mr. L. A. Jean 550 Marine Avenue Manhattan Reach, California January 14, 1959 Bardin and Cunningham 159 Auburn Street Salinas, California Attention: Hiles Cunningham its: McFadden -Joan Property ;bar Mr. Cunningham: The City of San Luis Obispo has formed an off-street parking district for the purpose of acquiring certain properties in the City of San Luis Obispo for municipal off-street parking purposes. One of the parcels involved is owned by Fire. McFadden and Mrs. Jean. At the request of Mrs. McFadden 1 am contacti.no you on this matter. The City has mused an appraisal to be made of the parcel, and I be" been authorized to offer your clients the appraised value of 29,347.00 for their property. The parcel involved is located on the northwesterly corner of the inter- section of Kiguera and 0sm `]treat and has a street frontage of 60.58 feet on Higuera Street. I wish to apologies for not contacting you personally, but I feel that you will probably desire to hews your own appraisal made of the parcel and therefore I am making this aq initial contact with you at this time. Inasmuch as we must acquire 80% of the property by negotiations or ccodwo nation prior to issuing bonds, I would appreciate a reply to our offer at your earliest convenience. Sincerely yam, RICMRD D. MIILEF, Administrative Offioer RDM:cs cc- " . :.oucer 6 0 October 11, 1958 1Vir. Robert C_ i.111nv 9un�nrl �,.e Santo Lam; Dear teres San 1 oil a the V. YOU cludi in th any 1 has 1 lions very on th may of th, f t- n hich r- Aher 1. let e >P' no sly tficer We hide this will serve to answer your current inquiries as to theprolect•s status. y:,ry truly yours, STONE 6 YOUNGBERG Richard M. BGrtle RMB: r cc: Mr. Richard D. Miller Mr. Sidney B. Hook 6 6 p.xla s.4.. STONE & YOUNGBERG J C.wll[L[Y0....[w4 MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANT5 B[x u J Bnux P, Gwoss U55 BUILDING ppx M owns $AN FR CISGO N[wr.x SU..[w 1�60 October 21, 1958 Mr. Richard D. Miller, Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: Supervisor Robert C. Lilley of Santa Barbara County is appar- ently a property owner in San Luis Obispo, and he asked Sid Hook of our firm for some information as to how the San Luis Obispo off-street parking project was going. Attached is a copy of my letter, which you should find to be entirely factual. We will probably see each other at the League meeting next week, and I hope you can give me an optimistic progress report at that time. Sincerely yours, STONE & YOUNGBERG Richard M. Bartle RMB:jr encl. (1) r JUN 1958 RECEIVED + City Clark The undersigned property owner herewith protests th 5",�,$L O.CAL establishment of the proposed Parking District, in the City of San Luis Obispo. This protest is based on the following grounds: 1. The presently designated parking lots, to -wit, "A" and "D" will not adequately provide for the parking needs of the greatest number of persons In the City at the present time, nor will they provide for the future parking expansion of the Cityrs business District. 2. The establishment of the contemplated parking lots designated in the petition and the issuance of bonds to pay for them will effectively "freeze" the Cityrs ability to acquire other and additional parking lots within the area of the proposed district for the greater portion of the life of the bonds. 3. The loss to the City by reason of the removal from the rolls of tax -paying property as a result of the acquisition of the lots for the two proposed parking lots will be greater than would be occasioned by the acquisition of other more desirable lots which could be acquired more cheaply than the contemplated ones. This removal of higher tax -paying property from the rolls will result in a greater increase in the general taxes required to be paid by all of the tax -payers of the City than otherwise would be required. (}. Other, more desirable property can be acquired for park- ing purposes than either of the contemplated lots. This property Is situated at the corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets. The advantages cf this property are as follows, to -wit: a. It can be acquired more cheaply. b. It will serve a greater present and future con- centration of business. C. By double -decking the area and installing public comfort statimis, it could be used as the first step in the forwarding of the park plan which l.as been fostered by the womenrs organizations of this City. THE TOTAL COST OF SITE AO:�UISITION AND DOUBLE -DECKING COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED FOR LESS MONEY THAN WOULD BE EXPENDED IN CCNNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LOT "D". d. Itts acquisition would also serve to solve the • present traffic problem created on Chorro Street be- tween Monterey and Higuera Streets. • e. It will not remove approximately 30 streets parking spaces with the loss of about $2500.00 per year parking meter revenue as would be the case with the elimination of Court Street as is contemplated in the present plan. f. It will be the only method by which any develop- ment in the Monterey-Chorro Street area can be stimu- lated. g. It provides an area which is capable of ex- pansion, whereas Lot "D" cannot be expanded beyond the original limits. This protest is not based upon any opposition to a Parking District as such. Rahter it is the feeling and opinion of the Protestants that such a District should take the best available property taking into consideration all of the present and future needs of the City. Considering the present needs of the City as well as its future; Considering that the suggestion for the lot at the corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets can be acquired more cheaply; Considering that the cost per parking space will be less; Considering that it will provide additional parking spaces to the City and at the same time will not remove any presently existing spaces; Considering that it will help solve the City's traffic problem on Chorro Street; Considering that It would also provide the basis for the solution of the Cityts need for a park area in the center of the City; Considering that formation of the, District in its present form will prevent acquisition of other lots for many years to come; The undersigned herewith protests the establishment of the present proposed parking district. "Johnson Trust" Z21 I, By Attorney or Jo. ORRICK. DANLOUIST. HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE X.O Pn�LA CONMSCLORB AND ATTONNCTB Al lAA CASL8 AOORC84 'ORRICX .LO.I.T O [O PO[ MCPRIXOTOM AOC NONTOO.INI 9TRD1 IOOODP6LOW, CRLR,..NZ S OPPICP1 ExwSAN FRAMCIECO 4 D. noLDT X.OP pIC N.J P. O wv RL . A.PO Xl1 LN CP LT CO.OIL ON wIETOPN[P M. J[XRS WILLIAN D.NRRee June 17, 1958 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. 1 Dear Mr. Miller: In connection with the June 23, 1958 hearing on the formation of the above district, we have prepared and enclose original and eight copies of Ordinance Declaring Parking District No. 1 formed and describing the acquisition and improvements to be made therein, to be introduced in the City Council at the conclusion of the June 23 hearing. Prior to introduction of the ordinance, page 2 will have to be com- pleted either to show that there were no protests or listing the names and addresses and descriptions of property owned by the protestants and the reasons for their objections. If for any reason the hearing is continued to a date subsequent to June 23, introduction of the ordinance will have to be delayed until conclusion of the adjourned hearing. The ordinance assumes that the description of the district and the description of the parking places to be acquired will be identical with these descriptions appearing in the petition and Resolution of Intention. Assuming that the Ordinance is introduced on June 23, the City Clerk should immediately submit one copy to the TELEGRAM TRIBUNE for setting up in type and proofs should be submitted to the City Clerk and to us for checking. The news- paper -should be instructed to publish the ordinance once on Thursday, June 26 and thereafter to file an affidavit of publi- cation with the City Clerk and to forward two such affidavits to us. The ordinance should then be finally passed and adopted at the regular Council meeting on Monday, July 7. Upon final passage of the ordinance, two certified copies should be re- turned to us for our transcript. One of the remaining enclosed copies of the ordinance 1s for your file, one is for the City Attorney and three should be certlf]d and held for filing with the State Board of Equalization, County Recorder and City Assessor, pursuant to instructions which we will give you later, r ORRICK. DANLOUIST. HERRINGTON a SUTCLIFFE Mr. Richard D. Miller 2 June 17, 1958 In order that our transcript will be complete to date, I $hall appreciate your forwarding to me two affidavits of publication of Resolution No. 370 (1958 Series), the Resolution of Intention. We have been advised by Mr. Bartle of Stone & Youngberg that the drafting of the Resolution of Issue for the bonds is to be delayed for the time being pending a final determination as to the necessity of condemnation of one of the parking lots to be acquired. I am sending a copy of this letter and a copy of the enclosed ordinance to Mr. Bartle. Very truly yours, NDR:mmr Enclosures Cc: Mr. Richard M. Bartle • • ..x ...o J C wc,[L[ V x fw6 B [.MJ.M�N J 9.uwOa P�cr,.wo P Gwosg B.ww� M.N[wu.N STONE & YOUNGBERG MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS PUSS BUILDING SAN FRANCISCO 5U11. I I... June 12, 1958 Mr. Richard D. Miller. Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: To confirm our telephone conversation of today, I shall plan to attend the council meeting on June 23rd. I will be prepared to answer general questions and hope that my participation will be helpful to you. Since condemnation may be necessary in order to acquire the land for the parking lots, we shall not proceed with plans for a bond sale until after property acquisition is more nearly complete. Best wishes. RMB:jr Sincerely yours, STONE & YOUNGBERG Richard M. Bartle STONE S YOUNG®ERG J.CwwLi[L[ Veuxaa[w. MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS B6NJwMM J BAYu RUS$ BUILDING Rrcxawa n Oroes oox N. o ma SAN FRG CO 9awwv M.NMxwx $Ufi[R 1-yp60 June 10, 6910111, (_ �Up 1,94 Mr. Richard D. Miller, o $ dCO�!_`FO Q'�r Administrative Officer 11 1�2 City of San Luis Obispo City Hall �9ZSlDtf San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick, According to the schedule on your Parking District No. 1, the dis- trict should be officially formed on July 7. Apparently the city can act to sell bonds at any time after this date. We are not certain as to the present status of property acquisition. Our indications were that the parcels in Site A had been acquired or were under option, but we have no recent information on Site D. There appears to be little or no advantage in trying to proceed with the bond sale until all the property has been acquired. This may then constitute the principal fac- tor determining when bonds are to be sold. Under the assumption that you will be able to complete arrangements for acquiring Site D in the next month, we have prepared our recommendations as to the financing plan and have submitted them to Mr. Herrington so that they can be incorporated in the draft of the resolution. We are enclosing a copy of our letter to him so that you can see what suggestions we have dis- cussed with him. We have assumed that the principal amount of bonds will be $420, 000. We have recommended that the bonds be scheduled to mature over a 25-year period but to become callable in 5 years. We have provided that 50 per cent of surplus pledged revenues will be applied to the call of bonds, thus shorten- ing the effective term of the issue. Our present estimate is that the entire issue will be retired in 19 years, We will be preparing a bond prospectus to be sent to prospective purchasers of the bonds prior to the sale. I hope soon to be in San Luis Obispo to collect information for the prospectus and also to review with you the final details of the project. We are now aiming, if possible, to have the bond resolution drafted and ready for adoption by July 14 or 21 with bonds to be sold August I or 18. Mr. Richard D. Miller -2- June 10, I958 These dates are dependent, of course, on your completing the necessary property acquisition. If you have any comments of these suggestions or any interesting information about your progress on the project, please let us know. Sincerely yours, STONE & YOUNGBERG Richard M. Bartle RMB:er Encl . June I0. 1938 b rzr 5gMr. George HerringtonOrrick, Dahiqulst, Herrington & Sutcliffe teivee 405 Montgomery Street t� SLa *k 0 San Francisco 4, California CAL Dear Mr. Herrington: According to the time schedule furnished by your office, the City of San Luis Obispo Parking District No. I should be formed by ordinance ad- opted July 7. We assume that the city can proceed to offer bonds for sale at any time after the district is formed. We expect that the bond resolution for this district will be substan- tially sindiar to Resolution No. 2065 of the City of San Rafael. In the dis- cussion which follows we refer to the sections as designated in the San Rafael Resolution. If it is possible for your office to work on drafting the San Luis Obispo resolution, perhaps we can aim for adoption on July 14 or 21. with a bond sale in mid -August. The following suggestions reprueeut our ideas as to the financing plan which should be followed: SECTION 1.01(k) - (Section nur.:;oera refer to San Rafael Resolution) Existing city owned lots should be considered part of the Proje:a, and revenues from these existing late should be pledged to the security of the bonds. This may be taken care of here as a defi- nition or at some later point in the resolution. SF,CTION 1.014) - Gross revenue from off-street lots and net revenues from on -street meters are to be pledged. Probably a definition of "Annual Net Revenues" should be added. SECTION 2.02 - Series A bonds will be $420,000 principal amount dated August 1, 1953. Interest will be payable Jan- uary 1 and July 1, with the first payment due July 1, 1959. The maturity schedule will be as follows: Maturity bate Principal July 1960-1965 10,000 1966-1972 15,00G 1973 20,000 2999 230,000 e Mr. George Herrington -2- June 10, 1958 Paying agent requirements will be the same as in the San Rafael; Resolution. SECTION 204 - Bonds numbers 1 to 190 maturing 1959 to 1973 are not callable. The term bonds maturing In 1983 are callable from revenues beginning August 1, 1963 and it, other sources beginning August 1, 1968. Call premiums should be as follows: Redemption on and Prior to Premium and After August 1 August I 1963 1966 4 �. I966 1969 3-1/z % 1969 197Z 3 %. t. 1972 1975 Z-1/2 1975 1977 2 N 1977 1979 1-I/Z Wr 1979 1981 1 % 1981 None If less than all bonds are called, they are to be called by Int; t; SECTION 3. 02(c) - Net revenues must equal at least 1.0 tlm as maxi- mum annual debt service on all series of h00 0rder to permit additional bonds to be issued. 75 per cent of e mated revenues are to be allowed. SECTION 3.03 - Moneys remaining in the Acquisition and Improve- ment Fund after completing the work described In _ the petition, can be used for additional parking facilities or may bed posited 1n the Revenue Fund. Funds on hand in the "Off -Street Parking Reserve" (an account now maintained by the city) are to be transferred to the Acquisition and - Improvement Fund on August 1, 1958, No deductions are to be made from this balance for the Reserve Fund or for operation and malnten•- once. A total of $30, 000 from the bond proceeds to to be deposited in the Bond Reserve Fund. SECTION 5.01 - The pledge differs in San Luis Obispo since only net revenues from on -street meters are pledged. The coverage to be guaranteed Is net revenues equal to 1.0 times bond ser- vice. Apparently this to the tame as provided in San Rafael. c, sv Mr. George Barrington -1- June 10, SECTION 5.03 - Only net revenues from on -street meters are de- "01 posited in the Revenue Fund. Gross revenues from off-street parking facilities are to be depooited in the Revenue Fund. SECTION 5.04 - Deposits of revenues are to begin in September 1958. SECTION 5.05(1) - We would prefer making deposits of 1/6 of interest and 1l12 of principal each month with the provisions that the full amount required be in the boad service fund at least one month before the Interest payment date on which It is required. This wonid necessitate an adjustment do" the first year In order to on schedule tout the procedure would be simpler thereafter. SEC'nON 5.05(2)- The Reserve Fund for Series A Is $30,000. i provisions should be Included for Increasing the re- serve if additional bonds are issued. SECTION 5.05(3) - Minimum Sinking Fund deposits are required In order to call at least the following amounts of bonds in each of the year* specified. Year Ending Minimum Principal July i Amount to be Redeemed 1974-1978 i201000 1979-1982 25,000 After provision for bond service, reserve, and operation and maintenanc 50 per cent of the surplus pledged net revenues are to be deposted in the Stnktag Fund and axed exclusively to can or purchase bonds. If addit)ow bonds are sold, the surplus deposit is to be divided among Sinking Funds for all series in proportion to the principal amount of each outstanding. Money in the Sinking Fund can be used to purchase bonds in the open mar and to lion of call. The price must not exceed 104 or the current redeml tion price. The operation and maintenance provisions of the San AsiaeI Resolution ; appear satisfactory although some difficulty might develop In determining how much surplus is to be deposited In the Sinking Fund. is SECTION 5.06 - Investment should be permitted in securities mat 'y71or to the time funds are needed for expenditu ' payment" rather than maturing prior to the next Interest payment date:'" .. These notes should provide you with a basis on which to proceed with a resolution draft. We shall be aystifable for discussion If you encounter any particular problems with which we might be able to help you. Very truly yours. STONE k YOUNGBERG Richard M. Bartle FILE COPY • CITY RK'S CFFICE CITY Of N LUIS OBISPo AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING COPIES OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION STATE OF CALIFORNIA as County of San Luis Obispo J. H. FITZPATRICK, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That afflant Is and at 311 times herein mentioned was, and now is, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California; that on the 27 day of May, 1958, pursuant to Section 35260 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, he mailed a copy of Resolution of Intention No. 370 duly passed and adopted by the City Council of sold City of -+n Luis Obispo, to each person to whom real property in the prop.,_ district described In said Resolution of Intention is asseasec as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, at his address as shown upon the roll, and to each person, whether owner in fee or having a lien upon, or legal or equitable interest in, any real property within the proposed district described in said Resolution of Intention, whose name and address and a designation Of the real property in which he Is interested is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City of San Luis Obispo. Affiant made diligent efforts to ascertain the names and addresses Of all persons owning real property in the proposed district described in said Resolution of Intention as of the time of said mailing and as of a date not more than fifteen (15) days before the date of the hearing specified In said Resolution of Intention, including the inspection by or for the affiant of the County Assessor's records, the County Tax Collector's records and the County Recorder's records, and inquiry at other sources. There was no person owning real property in the proposed district described in said Resolution of Intention whose name and address were not known to af£iant at the time of said mailing and on said last mentioned date and that the Resolution of Intention was mailed to each and all of the aforesaid persons by depositing a copy of said Resolution of Intention, addressed to each of the aforesaid persons, with the proper and necessary postage prepaid, in the United States mail at San Luis Obispo, California. A list of the names and addresses of the persons to whom copies of said Resolution of Intention were mailed is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo, jZrZrAT L;A City C116rk, City of San Luis Obispo Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27 day off May, 19`8. in and for said County and State [SEAL] L2. r 0 O�, Y` :..G �',<! �F.�.p_.. iJ � r _,� .L;., • i �'� L i„G P 7,.:.,� e•Y�-°'ar_. N r_ } .- ✓ " i v�.F' u�. ✓�/ �. t -_ a_. / .I k.._ V.i +G Y �Y`; � . /q(� 4 / �>M1r^[' ' i �.f+ qF _ w r Y `^' �� ^/}' s.>Uf 4%r1� �'Rs�� ..•R>.L•..G�.'�iJH .'� �'w. } �-f.�;:� Y � d• I: _ �vs.i f �f iS: i �' „_ �Ly • .� _. �{ / L�'y✓ 4' � �' �M1�.i/�1/, L.t1� l - 6 l�Ci �tr,�'(� 9' /� ,j�e G',�. / l'/✓ I{5Y ,%.aYv..G. y�J � .Y �lr��.{v :?�'�1�/%[.1rF+l✓ .. / O T � ��1Rf w.�. n j� P ��IG " tea' .' n_� A'-: _ �, it 1 � '.'#. l .i�'Go.. .... - .- .«. /- ., ,�� �t y ,�rl: x- .7-y��•�.3 - ...� � /.. l+ - ... r '..1 '_J y �/ ,� � ,,. rr� i �l a �� ,�a� ,, M ,. ' .-� ! ,i 'y7 n . � � rl :� 1 Y Z,^' / ) L - s t' '.' "', ..e ' 4 J ....�/.' '� i ... . i.:o "....> , 4.: "7""�� , ✓:�,..xa l'� Z (/;E'=:.�r - i:'�5,5�' �.,r�....c.. .., ..Cls ,, ae : �.. .� 1; �-�*^' ✓f/ �//�JL."rL� ._..� // � * ,!.2= � � o(a c. .�i:: - L+�'4f- .}..6,"p+X.. �tS��J.. ...( G'M'/-/4' T r � >... Q! `/ K"., �.e`a.%✓ 5n (��QJ"y,;:Q-p'.. -�'.�.� F i ("r. , .. _� (n._. a::r, a-�'>.. ✓ :... +._.!'..r ....�, -'�'✓r-���:,, v�'-.ts 1, t✓✓... ,-�..% � �-✓ -' � t..;G.,.� �, �' r ✓.7 cJ ���/✓'9./.f of �1 ,\] Ufa l(/ , ., • , '¢'c�.r .: '�/ „};9,,� fs.', _ r ;?-�r F 1.�,7 �+:'c lFq„J ,.rL7� z;.:,. .�.. �d�t aF ' Y'd e-� li-,J �/./ , v / r .4-Ara (f i..r 1�.%' {%'w i C.d r L / / s. v �,,. .. ��'• © ✓s, ti �`1'1--� J r PJ 4 r.+e_ � "' r,{. +✓+/ ° r n,,._ /� 1 i,x � x �I �ri a —; /'- � i P/� �' V��+.L �',•J .i✓ ".Lw ` i<.9 . f ^r. %'-.� � r'WGI.(� f� -T � A �uJ `�/�'� y yc i ,y, �..1J.'{�• i r f+ )1 x.f :i _�';.1., Y� :Yta-i� � �L L:'; �2e'O+' ��/C� 44-� .-A. ..s �«J p F i 11c 0 0 u a1 ..�xi Q� ✓in �(Y�L',. �i ��%-rim 41 ��... T r f_3r.�f r'J �' �`K7" .' v[':ed AR-•'�yJ@�"F�0..a'�v'�.„�y,�.Lt'&2n'� /%�%/in:.?4R,�'.�i., �y'f_c:�3+i%+�Tx �` ��� L// � G�. .`7°.1 ...yZ,-lG '� ` '�:.'�-s r�:„�g�-�j�•w^{r. �.�'`.., •�%�'=C�Ly� >�?.c•YL C S / 4 U F.".KR ,'J.r L� �.cr d�,� �. /y r .1 ^%', .Y✓�'�J.�F �- � : ' :a.c't .'..�f �. ,.,v Jr ry, :.:rJ i. 2F��ZQ.' .: °�a ...2n .'lX�_ -�.�sf q'�'�•.G � a r' �'•�u'-% `.�E -//. ,1.aa,z; t.-c. .7c.a.. r,.qd;:.. - -',{t,a/,-c _�� �� `D.I �{'�r -./i �'i '. �� .'..c. raL9 + s ... , u..cT.-rd I� �•' �caLrs. i:J -.!L- ✓`1JF- of - f"„�,i� ��IY'.Q�„J?GF1'� ,i J" 1.� �`-�.�G�1');/ z 1 �G'�- �•. J" /�L�.P {O i /r �/li// -.r'`i� J d/Y �Jc.`w ✓<G/YIJt i I wYl4'li �lY/ � .�I9l.Sr' • - • + � �r-✓.:%-%5 ,�, r� .: � yl rjy...<< t..r :• S :='i��,: �.'.t 2 � . L[z.- .j= �2: F ;2�, W it ".ii /' �� /, � v� / a �. ��,5-�7 nk';�- �. 4 � . i -.5.; f- i.� ' � � . - _. J - �..� %� �„ ice, , ` .t... `� : _ `. r �� / r� n tiay 1, 1958 7. Jackson Foustman 2330 Pruitridge Road Sacramento 22, Calif. Dear Jask i T.n answer to ymar inq d.ry of April 28, 1958 received here today in regard to the )ropoffed parking aesessnent district, the following information is ':Mvidsdt 1. :'Am assessor, J. 11. Fitzpatrick advises as follows in regard to the cost estiimatea for land value which represent the largest share of the �nr'oject coati "i believe that the cost estimates for land acquiaition for the two lots n" still valid and conservative estimates of the value." % Ite also advisee tYat the total assessed valuati<o n within the district innlisiing lead end buildings is $2,782,820.00. 3. Parking meter revenues 1957 to date antes en -street July, 1957 $ August 3,095.13 Soptember 2,346.16 October 3,516.88 llovmber 2,704.46 December 3,541.27 January, 1958 2,654.40 February 2,490.87 '.arch 3,002.12 April 3 21if,. !on-stroet and off-stroat) by months from June, Off-atrest Total $ -Mr.w— 8 3;M.00 610.37 39705.50 611.84 2,958.00 650.12 4,167.W 647.54 3,352.00 1,015.73 4,557.00 696.60 3,351.W 614.13 3,105.00 622.88 3,625.00 790.12 $, - 4. 03 .W $ 4. The only significant change in the central district which would affect revenues in connection with the proposed district is the eoenall's deeieion to tear dam the two store buildings located on Lot 02. 57s had been recei." flla5 a iwnth rent fray the two stores, but sane of the loea will probably be offset by the addition of 17 metered maces in the lot. As I uadertand the situation, we are to go ahead with the preliminary steps in forming the district t1da kondav sveni,ig, including the filing of year engi.neerlig report, unless we hear train you to the contrary. Photocopies to Bartle, 5 ',. Sincerely rours' s and Sprague of O,D,ii L S RIODAD D. MILLER �a yretaleel„4w, O.JACK50N FAU5TMAN J AtNlOM E/.0 lTNxN�t. EN O. CONSVlTIN6 TRAF6IC HNOIN HfR GAwOeN lSOO! SACRAMENTOT22. CAIIFORN IA April 28, 1958 Mr. Richard Miller City Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: As you know, Dick Bartle and Frank Sprague have asked me to confirm certain estimates contained in my July 15, 1957, letter on the off-street parking plan. Would you please advise me as soon as possible concerning the following: 1. The correctness of the cost estimates, with particular reference to land value. 2. The assessed valuation of the taxable real property in the proposed district. 3. Parking meter revenues (on -street and off- street) by months from June, 1957, to date. 4. Have there been any significant changes in the central district which would affect the probable usage of the proposed facilities? Sincerely, DJF:b D. Jackson Fa'ustman cc -Richard Bartle 1] ORRICK. DANLOUIaT. HERRINGTON S SUTCLIFFE n. OWWICC COYNSCLOW8 AND ATTORNEYS AT LAW CAGLa ADDAeS.'ORRIC R" W ..I .C.Nix OTOM ... DAOa MONT DOM CAT STPCCi [ IOOOp01K O,tILOw,ECLLs.M! OIImc11I MK aL'ELnrt SAN PEANusm4 NATHAN D. AOWLr. WiCx.JN ORVILLE ,POMLF WINNER A NCN CMRTN O.O LSO. aTONMCR M.JCNxS APILiAM D. Naxa April 23, 195B Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City of San Luis Obispo California Dear Mr. Miller: Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District Enclosed herewith are the following documents scheduled to be adopted by the City Council at its meeting of Monday, May 5, 1958 relative to the formation of the proposed off-street parking district: 1. Original and 5 copies of a resolution approving the petition for formation of the district. Prior to adoption, the date of filing should be inserted in the blank space provided in the first recital on page 1 of the petition. Following adoption, we shall appreciate your furnishing 2 certified copies for our transcript. 2. Original and 5 copies of an ordinance declaring and agreeing that the City lands within the proposed district shall be held and used in the same manner as the parking places to be acquired within the proposed district. The ordinance should be passed to print at the meeting of Monday, May 5, 1958 and prior thereto the date of filing the petition should be inserted in the first recital on page 1, and the date of adoption and resolution number of the foregoing resolution should be inserted in the second recital. The ordinance should be published in the San Luis Obispo Telegram Tribune on May 8, 1958 and we shall appreciate your furnishing proof of the ordinance prior to publication. Again, we shall require 2 certified copies of the ordinance following its final adoption on May 19, 1958. We shall forward the resolution of intention scheduled to be adopted on Monday, May 19, 1958, in the near future. Very truly /y-ours, Frank L. Sprague Enclosures cc: Mr, Richard Bartle Stone k Youngberg San Francisco, California ORRICK. DAHLOUI8T. HERRINGTON 9 $UTCLIFFE W. M. ORR�Cx COUNS[LORS.NO ATTORN[VS AT LAW C..L[.1DDNf SS "ORRICR" .XLOUIft O COPOC NM.x xO tOx .OS MONTOOENT XT SRCCT IOOOOfCLLOW.E[LLf.MOO1K S OWRICNI twit aUTam[ SA. iR.xGSCO 1.Owt6t x. ORNICN.Jw. O x vIL ROHLF N[R LTCP O.OLSON CX W�BTOPX[R M. J[xN4 wLLLLM D. M..a April 22, 1958 Mr. Richard D. Miller Adminstrative Officer City of San Luis Obispo California Re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District Dear Mr. Miller: We have reviewed the petition for the formation of the parking district which Mr. Fitzpatrick forwarded the other day and find it to be in order with the exception that Mr. Fitzpatrick should execute a new certificate dated after April 15, 1958, Inasmuch as some of the signatures to the petition were made on that date. I should also appreciate Mr. Fitzpatrick confirming that the figures set forth in the Clerk's Certificate include the signatures of April 15, 1958. Upon execution of the certificate as aforesaid it is in order for the City Clerk to file a petition in his office. Enclosed is the original and one copy of a time- table setting forth the steps in the formation of the parking district. We shall forward the documents required for the May 5 meeting of the Council at an early date. Very truly yours, ��7- Frank L. Sprague Enclosure cc: Mr. Richard Bartle Stone & Youngberg Russ Building San Francisco, California Gast IAl dlea/tiA REAL ESTATE • LOANS INSURANCE SAN LU's OBISPO CALIFORNIA ` Februnry 20, 1958 Mr. Jean F. Fitzpatrick City Clerk City of San Lute 0 Sspo Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick: In checkup the cards in your office, we found that some properties were not included to your list which.. accord - to our records. should be included. They are: Joseph 9. & Emalete Berkemeyer - Code 2-423-21 Thoodere- 14e4ae ka you probably know James R. McClure is deceased. There- fore in obtalnin,e his wife', signature, M. Mable McClure, we assume that Code 3-525-08 should be included. In the case of Oueenie W. warden, she In deceased. we assume that Horatio N. warden would be sufficient and there- fore Codes 2-423-19 and 2-423-09 should be Included. In the case of Martha Day Spengler. she is deceased and we therefore obtained her husband's signature under Code 2- 425-09. Will you please advise us if these corrections are in order. Tours very truly, �'}Jl RPI/deb �' 9. Y. Iv(i 1 6G-11 -r cc�_ 1. H. F111PATR10% City Cle[r January 28, 1958 Mr. Harold Kjaerbys Chamber of Commerce Traffic and parking Committee 986 Montery Street San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mr. Kjaerbys; This is to inform you that we have finally completed the check on the petitions filed by your committee for the formation of a parking assessment district of the downtown area of the City. We regret that after checking various points with the legal advisers, the following conclusions were reached, based on the petitions as originally presented. Of the total area of the proposed district only 344 of the area was signed properly. Of the total assessed valuation for the district only 354 of the valuation was properly signed. Both area and assessed valuation are below the required 5194. In some cases, we will need additional property owners signing for the proposed district. There is also a group of Petitions attached hereto which were signed on behalf of various corporations and companies which cannot be accepted, as no authority was attached by the company or corporation allowing the inclusion of property owned by said company or corporation. Those Individuals who have signed on behalf of their company or corporation should obtain a resolu- tion from the respective governing bodies of such company or corporations authorizing the official or individual who signed the petition to execute said petition on behalf of the company corporation. In the event no such resolution has been passed then a resolution or official document ratifying said execution should be obtained. Such document should also bear the company's official Real. 1� Attached also is a list of petitions we are returning for completion. If we can be of any further service, please let us know. Respectfully, .1 itzpatrick City Clerk JHF:rcw Enclosures b LIST OF PETITIONS 'ILTURNE 1. Henry L. Minetti (Angela L. Mwre) 2. Masonic Hall Association 3. First Presbyterian Church 4. L. 1,4 Kamm (agent for Wanda K. Wright) 5. Bank of imerica N. T. S. A. 6. Melsand Corporation 7. Title Insurance and Trust Company 8. Pacific Southwest nealty Company 9. sandercock Transfer Company 10. San Luis Clinic, Inc. 11. Telegram -Tribune Company 12. Security Title Insurance Company 13. United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners of America 0 C7 November 15, 1997 Mr. D. 2330 F7 9aerar Dear J, can aw prior i the pal diatric patibie an awu commonl f7 m < for the tion ii ftehard M. Bartle Soi�rMs. Bichai+! D, a*illsr m the tm are LY Sion wtory iforma— ITIAp7'&tt 6" An sot to add Section 35Zr,•1 to the Streets &ad ligh" Code& felating to Fkb11a ftrktft. (Appaevsd 4 4overnor %UW 31t 1957. riled with Secretary or State June 1, 1957y. In effcat Seutwr"r 11. 1957. .h# peeple of the State of 0411€oania do maot as follower Secti.vn 1. Smotian 35973.1 is added to the etraets wA higtnwys cede, to raadr 3$V3.1. The i.e.isiative tgdy ahall not pan vq. ordirrnae fordit a district wwar Uds par! until it shell huree procured sash information as it dower necessary and adequat3 to mnablo it to dater mine whether there is VdAU need for such facilities, vhhaur the rxvpssw district yrprwdmtoly sawn the eontigmoua was oaailag neeb $acuities, vbVt W p"tialont pm" L.P within the prepmod dis- triot will, be bansfited thereby, and whether t'* proposed iwororerento ue locatedgmr and dnied in the as�raer mot omWaprahllas With Vm gr9atoet Phalle good and the least private injUr7. r ORRICK. DAHLOUIaT. HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE N.Oww¢a COUNSELORS... ATTOWNEY. AT LAW CA.LE A.. AE5S "ORRICK" N tOYi\T OTOM POE MO.T.O.E.19TRECT fO000FELww.ECLLa..... SORwICK 1EHC U CII—E 541 fWwNC15 CO 4 T AT AN0 BOWL N. PONLCV O .. WILL... WICM1.JW. 0 wviLl6 A. wOULE AI ...oN November 15, 1957 c.Ri.TOWP..w ... JEN.a Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City of San Luis Obispo California re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District Dear Mr. Miller: Confirming our conversation by telephone, the petition for the formation of a parking district under the Parking District Law of 1951 is only a preliminary step in the formation of the district and accordingly sets forth only the general outline of the proceedings to be taken in accordance with the statute. if the District is formed and bonds are issued the more detailed statement of the terms and conditions of the bonds, the obligation of the City to maintain on -street parking meters, to collect the net revenues thereof and apply the same to the payment of prin- cipal and interest on the bonds and to maintain off-street parking facilities for off-street parking purposes will be set forth in the resolution providing for the issuance of the bonds. When the bonds are issued pursuant to the resolution, a contract will be created between the City of San Luis Obispo and the holders of the bonds which may not be impaired by action of any subsequent City Council and the bondholders will be entitled to enforce all of the terms and conditions of the resolution pro- viding for the issuance of the bonds in accordance with its terms. Accordingly, no subsequent City Council will be legally authorized to abandon the off-street public parking facilities and devote the property to any other purpose so long as the bonds are outstand- ing. The resolution providing for the issuance of the bonds will also define the net revenues pledged to the payment of the prin- cipal and interest of the bonds, presumably following the statutory language set forth in Section 35104 of the Streets and Highways Code. This section provides among other things that net revenues means the revenues remaining after certain deductions, including the cost of collecting revenues. The resolution will specifically provide that the cost of enforcing police regulations and other unusual expenses of policing or enforcement may be paid only out ORRICK. DAH LOU I ST. HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 2 of surplus revenues remaining after all debt service charges on the bonds have been paid. In substance, therefore, the re- solution will adequately protect the rights of the property holders so as to insure the application of on -street parking revenues, together with the revenues from the public parking lots to the payment of principal and interest on the bonds. If the revenues prove to be sufficient as shown by the preliminary estimates it should not be necessary to levy ad valorem assess- ments and in any event such assessments would only be levied to the extent that the revenues are inadequate to pay a debt service, as will be more fully defined in the resolution providing for the issuance of the bonds. I remain, Sincerer (1H: Jb r�ctoher 30, 17;7 The following is a brief outline of etepo taken in recent years by the City Council, planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce, citizens commlttece, staff monbers of the City and others in working toward a solution of the community's parking problems, The net results have been very gratifying„ in that the City now has three metered lots with 244 off-street parking spaces plea two unmetered lots with 7e spaces„ These 322 spaces acquired at a cost of more than Z200,00G have done much to relieve congeation and provide for customer parking 1n the downtown area, but the problem is still far from solved., ()me of the early steps taken by the City Council wag t}e appointment of a citizorg1 co'm11tW.e In June, 1953 to study the parking problem, This emi nittee applied itself dilicently and was aided in its studies by tl.,a arcm tectumal urfineerine department at Cal Poly, In a separate study, prepared under the direction of Georre Hasslein, head of the architectural engineering; department, published In April, 1954, it was pointed out that thane wane 1,246 on-otreat and off-street spaces available In the downtown area. It was felt that a minimum of 70C additional spaces were required and a priority list of locations for off-street parking lots was provided, The citizens' committee completed Its report In September, 1954 in which It also suggested certain lccations for parking lot development. In tnO meantImc, the City had retained Mr, Peter C. W. Patsch of Tanta Barbara for the purpose of making appraisals on certain parcels In the downtown area. Mr. Patsch also included in his report an opinion that the City war short some 172 to 465 off-street parking spaces. The appraisal report provided the basis for negotiation on acquisition of several parcels which were developed into city parking Iota. Parking lot No, 2 consisting, of 57 spaces was acquired, developed and opened to the public in Decomber, 1955„ At first it was planned to lease-purcbase .-: ,-.roperty, but since moneys were available In the off-street parkinf, re.em — the final decision was to purchase the necessary properties outright. At about this time,a merchant group becnu^e interested in providing still more off-ctrect parking and erpressed willingness to help strotch the moneys available in the City's off-street parkinr reserve by pledging additional funds cn a loan basis. By May, 1956, *15,500 was pledged on the condition that it be used in the vicinity of Chorro and Pacific Streets and with a time limit of Oecemher 31, 1956, As it turned out, this property did not become available in time,and the moneys which were pledged were never collected. Another development was the appearance before the Council by a Croup of dcwntcwn merchants and property owners in March. 1956 urging that the City form an assessment district for off-street parking purposes, The Council agreed to investigate the possibilities and hired D. Jackson Faustman, Traffic Engineer free Sacramento, and Stone and Younpborg, Municipal Financial Consultants from San Francisco, to make a thorough study of the Gity's parking needs. In the meantirw, the City was presented with the opportunity of acquiring the C. A. Maine property on Monterey Street which was developed as Municipal Lot Noe 3. Arranrencnts were made to pay for this property dur Lrr three diffemnt calendar years, and the lot was constructed and opened in Domnber, 19% providine 64 additional spaces, Mr. Faustman-s enCineering report was published in 1956, It showed 1.454 existing spaces available in the downtown ama and set forth a proposal for three additional lots totaling 112 spaces. His report wee distributed to various groups for atudy,but no important action was taken until Fobnmry, 1957 when the Clamber of Commerce parking and traffic coremittec met with the City Council to discuss the report. The committee expressed the thought that the project as recommended did rot go far encugh in solvint the probiom. The lot in the vicinity of Chorm and Pacific was fine, but the committee urCed that consideration also be Civen to the area behind the Anderson Hotel bounded by Struetc., The Council in ravS_awing its financial position stated that the City had exhausted all of its existing off- street parking reserves for at least a year in advance, but if sufficient intorest was expressed in going ahead on the bigger project or. an assessment district basis the Council would be willing to proceed. Ys, Faustian was therefore asked to revise his report which was done by July, 1957. His revised report included two lots totaling 160 s!aces. Following the publication of his report, Store and Youngberg ware authorized to study his proposal and report on its financial feasibility. In heir report an September 4, 1957 Stone and Youngberg found that a project totaling ;420,000 which would provide for sufficient reserves and contingencies was feasible provided that tie Council agreed to forego recovery of parking enforce. sent expensea from parking rater receipts until after bond Interest and redemption pa; nts had been made. This the Council has agreed to dog The priority for use of parking meter receipts will be as fcllowsa 1.,. Paynont of aster operation and collection expenses, 2, Payment of bond rudemption and interest charges. 3. Reirburserent to tie City for enforcement expenses, if sufficient moneys re.� Ix.. The financial consultants recamnded certain other provisions which nave been incorporated in tie petitions prepared by the legal firs of Urrick, Dahlquist, Herrington and :,utcliffe which are Wing presented to your group tonight for circulation. The City Council will some as tie parking commission to provide nenagoment of the district oYer the years. Under the terse of the 1951 act, property owners within the aasesement district my be taxed in an an t not to exceed 75 cents per 3100 of assessed valuation in can the parking meter receipts loss operating expanses are insufficient to pay bond service costs durir:z sny one year, however, we are assured that it is extremely unlikely that such an aseeearent will ever occur. The property owners will merely be standi.n, '_:et.ind the project to provide addit'.onal assure.nce for the bond b:yr.r, and it is assumed that the interest rate will therefore be that much lower., The City feels that the proposed parking lots will do much to stimulate business in the downtown area and that the businessman and property over has everything to gain and nothing to lose from the proposed project. The City has retained the best possible advisors in every step of the procedure and has fcllowed their advice to the letter.; We sincerely and enthusiastically present the project for your consideration and are hopeful that the necessary 51 percent sign up will be completed u soon as possible with some to spare so that the City can start on necpssary property acquisition procedures, Options are already available on Lot A, but there may be some problems in connection with acquirinC the parcels necessary for the development of Wt D„ Ve therefore feel that time is of 04 essence it the project is to be completed within the foreseeable future, At thin time, we would like to thank the Chamber of Commerce for its fine cooperation in helping the City to provide off-street parking in the downtown area. '.'e are especially grateful to Aarl Carpenter, who is the present Chamber president and who served on the original citizens` corumittee, and to llarold Y,jaerbys, who in chairman of the Chamber -�arkiA7 and traffic cammittoe and who has been of invaluable help to us for many years. 9 • STONE & YOUNGBERG J [uLnL[ Youvow. wa MUNICIPAL FINANCING CONSULTANTS 6. J. e.uv P.Gwaa RVSS eU11GING Ric x.wP vox M. em[ SAN FRANCISCO Mww. M. N[Wx.X 5 V V.Ew I-�96G October 10, 1957 Mr. Richard D. Killer, Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Dick: We have been reviewing the form of your parking district petition with the bond attorneys and find some additional informa- tion is needed. According to the bond attorneys the petition must state the streets upon which meters are to be installed. As a matter of policy the city Should decide whether or not it is willing to agree to meter all blocks and all streets within the district. We would like you to send us a map indicating the locations of meters within the parking district at the present time. You may also wish to indicate any addi- tional areas in which you propose to install meters in the relatively near future. With this information we can complete this important section of the petition. The bond attorneys also advise us that they need descriptions of the existing lots within the district which are to be contributed to the district project. The petition will be heavily, weighted in favor of legal descriptions, but the attorneys indicate there is no reasonable alternative. Once this information has been Supplied and if the other de- scriptions you have furnished are satisfactory, it should be possible to complete the draft of the petition and have it ready for circulation soon. Best wishes. Cordially yours, STO & YOU NGBFRG tl. Richard M. Bartle � f October 1, 1957 Orrick, Dahlquist, Herrington & Sutcliffe 405 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California Attentions George Herrington Dear Mr. Herringtonr The following will ccnfirm the changes in the tentative description for the proposed parking district boundary for the City of San Luis Obispo. Page 1s (fourth line from the bottom) change 360 53' to 360 221. Page lr 'third line from the bottom) change 360 53' to 360 221. Page 2i (seventh line from the top) after the words Northwesterly line of said conveyed property, delete the words "and the extension thereof" and add the followings "194.25 feet, thence North 360 22' went a distance of 40.93 feet to a point, thence South 530 36' West% We a:.preciate all your cooperation in this matter and will be looking forward to receiving the material for the petitions in the near future. Sincerely yours, Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer RDMsoe cc, w. A. Heelar J, If, Fitspetric✓ 1R1TAT,IT(_A _M CRIC_S Oit Ri010.4Ep OS!-3TR88T TATI f4 PLL 9 "iS D . (as indicated by Stops 3 Yoursberg report dated Srytombsr 4, 19 -1) In the City of San Wia Obispo, Count, of Sen Lids Obispo, State Of Californian All blot part Of Stock I; Of NO City of San Luis Obispo described as followal Hegl::.ni:;s at the most Northerly comer of said Block, theme South 06' neat along the Sec:theesterly line of lontetey Street feet to the Intersection of said Southeasterly lino with the Sorthwssterly, line of Court Street, bones South 3 A' Rust along file zmrtbeasterly ILL of Court Street 2,30.19 feet, more o +sea to the intereection thereof wit'+ tee Northwesterly lino of iCiUwra Street, thence aiortlreaaterly along the JortImmaterly line of iilguuera Street IJ2.. ' :set to the _..e. sect.o;: t>laraof with the Southwesterly liras of Owe stzvet, ttmace Korth i." 54' Weat obis the Southweaterli line Of Osee street Z29.42 feet, room or lose to tore point of beginning. SavL� and oacsptim therefrom that portion thereof described as followat 11109.1nn nG at Uw most yortherly corwr of said Block, thence South 54' 1*1 West alon6 the Southeasterly 14he of Monterey Street 6u feet orb anon *nm»s, thence South A, East 129 feet and five inches, thence North A* 06' East 60 feet and aevenn Inchou to the Southwesterly line of Oros Street, thence North 35° A' west alone tte Southwesterly lino of Ome Street 129 feet and five isw wo to tins point of beginning. SECURITY TITLE'I/NSURANNcE COWMV (au ir&.aated bJ St W & Youngbort report dated ."o.optaNaar g, 19�Z) PARCEL is Lot 14, the uOrthesegrly 30 feet Of Lot 15 sou! the PPorth- westeriy .,U feat of Lots 10 and 11 in Mack 100 of lE:aslen V4:-4yar0 Tract, in rue City of Sari Luia Obispo, County of tear Puts Obispo, State of ualifom;a, accordI:-v to rmp thereof leosnded in Book A page 141 of MPG in U)c 0fr-04 or Ua CO:urty Pievorder of said Coiscty, sxaeptirg Umersafrom a Parcel Of land 1n tho :Fort swoctor4 conwr of said Lot 14, esid Parcel meaax:rinC 35 feet an CtwrM Street too 100 feet deep. PARGAL 21 That portion of Pate 11 aad li and all Of Lot 1:. its alOCk 100 or Hission VP-mlard Tract in the City of Wk "In 0121"O, vaimty of _kan Luis 0�013po, State of Cal-�rornla, velord ng t0 the map USsraOf filed in Book A, at paps 143 of kapa, descr.bed as a Whole as folloraa Bv4S1m2nG cat the MoorthemmUrly corner of Ciiorrc Pauifi Streeta; v t*noe north 366 2.' west along the Euater4y lino or Chorro Street, 70 feet to a point, themm 33ort:1 J3• 07' rest 124.,j1 feet to Uro L%rthweat- Orly oorner of tine property desoribad in the dead to George R. Lewis, re- aordad 3ovember 27, 19i� ;n Hook lib, at page 44.s of Official itecords, LPw" scum ;,C• 22, chat Slang the westerly llna of propert;, descr.:aed in said deed TO foot to We Sau tIlmat oorner UVV"f sad to a point an the Northerly line of Paalfic Street; Umnoe 30-Ath :)J' 07' WOat a1OCP,g the N*rUvrly line of Pacific Street 124.jo feat to t Y po:.nt of PUWSL -s :be smurwaterly 10 feet of Lot 5, and the EJortheasterly 15 feet of Lot 7, la alo�;K 10U of the Mlosion Vineyard "Wct, in the City of S&I Win ftimm. , Coaalty of San WIS Obispo, State of C'al:.f s'n-la, ac- ::ordizza to rmp rece:vad 74amb 3, 1.31,3 in Use Off.ue of the County re- corder o£ as-;d Cor4;;, Zy,;sptLOg Vmrefinn wv portion thereof inul ded Within the L'.:1ee Of Nara , .',treat as aidetMd. SKUWY PIPIE INSURANCE COMPANY TENTATIVE DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED PARKING DISTRICT DOUNDARY (as indicated by Stone & Youngberg report dated September 4, 1957) In the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luia Obispo, State of California: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Nipomo Street with the centerline of Marsh Street, thence Northeasterly along the center- line of Marsh Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Broad Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Broad Street to the Intersection thereof with the centerline of Pacific Street, thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Pacific Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Garden Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Garden Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Pismo Street, thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Pismo Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Chorro Street, thence Northwesterly along the centerline of Chorro Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Pacific Street, thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Pacific Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Santa Rosa Street, thence Northwesterly along the centerline of Santa Rosa Street to the Inter- section thereof with the centerline of Monterey Street, thence South- westerly along the centerline of Monterey Street to the Intersection thereof with the centerline of Osoa Street, thence Northwesterly along the centerline of Osos Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Mill Street Lthence Southwesterly along the centerline of Mill Street to a point which bears North j6* 53' West from the most Northerly corner of Lot 1 in Block 19, thence South 36' 53' East to the Most Northerly corner of said Lot 1, thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said Lot to the most Easterly corner of said Lot, (1) Continued thence Southwesterly Sing the Southeasterly lind*f said Lot, and the extension thereof, to the centerline of Morro Street, thence Northwesterly to the most Northerly corner of the part of Block lj conveyed to the City of San Luis Obispo, a municipal corporation, by deed dated March 19, 1951 and recorded March 200 1951 in Book 6020 at page 69 of Official Records of San Luis Obispo County, thence South 530 38f west along the Northwesterly line of said conveyed property and the extension thereof to the centerline of Chorro Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Chorro Street to the intersection thereof with the center- line of Monterey Street, as said Monterey 1reet is located between Blocks 10 and 11 of said City, thence Southwesterly along the center- line of Monterey Street to the intersection thereof with the centerline of Broad Street, thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Broad Street to a point opposite the midpoint on the Northeasterly line of Block 3 of said City, thence Southwesterly in a direct line and across said Block 3 to a point on the centerline of Nipomo Street, opposite the midpoint on the Southwesterly line of said Block 3, thence South- easterly along the centerline of Nipomo Street to the point of beginning. SECURITY TITLE INSURANCE CQMPMY i (a) September lot 1957 Don Davis Store and Youngberg Russ Building San Francisco, California Drier bona The City Council met in study session with the Chamber group who are sup;,orting the propcead parking district er,d agreed on all essential points. fou are hereby authorized to proosed with the report and to work with the attcrne•,s on preosration of the nffieW petitions. We indicated 6 time Ing of about three weep and also committed i=r firm to another vreoral an,eararee here in Son Luis Obispo when we kick off the campaign to secure the necessary airnatures. Th.n,ne will be about 40 workers doing this. trlieve you have a few oranges in mind which I gave you over t:ha Phone several days W. The Celuieil is aprenable to Fivirg tie bond service costa oricrity war enforcerert exnenee but does not wish to set up the alnktnp fund. It is felt that extra mcne;,s should be used to reimburse the general fund for enforcement ex%nae; oW.erwise the taxpayers of the city would be subsidizing the downtown business section. Tim Couci.l wishes to leave future call of bonds on a flexible basis depending on future interest rate trends, fenerel financial condition of the city, and so on. The Council wi ! act as the perking onraissicn. .t is agreed that meters will remain on the street durinv the life of the bonds, although individual meters may be deleted or moved to facilitate traffic. It is also agreed that rates will be rained if necessary. Cne cuestion fps been raised regarding the descriptior. of the parcels to be acquired. In FaustJmenls M;, rtn, he refers to arbitrary lot and block rather than giving notes and bounds descriptions. Will you kindly cheek with err. Herrington and find out whether this will suffice. If not, will you have him contact sir. Fitzpatrick for the proper legal descriptions. If there are any questions remaining, please do not hesitate to contact um. We would appreciate your confirming receipt of this letter and advising us Of the tang on the next rocedural steps. Sincerely yours, 4IGiFAD D. MIUM Administrative Officer M,OwwSCN N LO UISi OCORO[ N[P RIN OTON [wlc SVTE LIf FE N D.w N.OwRiG x,� WxRR[N P w O LSOnR C NP19 RTO awCw N. ,ENx3 ORRICK. DAHLOUIHT. HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE COVNS ELOAS PND PT tOFNEYS PT llW C..' ADOPE55 "ORRIC." AOS NONTOON[RT ST9 EE` IGOOOFELLOWEELLD. MOOwE 9 OwwICRI 5PM FRaNCI5C0 4 July 18, 1957 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City of San Luis Obispo California re: City of San Luis Obispo Parking District Dear Mr. Miller: I acknowledge receipt of your letter of July 16 and confirm my verbal commitment that our legal fees for preparing the proceedings for the issuance of off-street parking revenue bonds under the 1951 Act will not exceed $1,000, assuming that the total authorized issue does not exceed $350,000. If the proceedings fail and the bonds are not actually issued and sold our legal fees will not exceed $300. I remain, GE: Jb a y, July 16, 1957 Orrick, !Waquiat, :(orringtou & Sutcliffe loth vloor 1,05 b"vtf ry Street "m Frarci.aoo h, California Attentimi Omrp HDrrington ,)entl~r Tn accotthv:ce vith our rarbal con"reatien of !.edmadK�j �%4 10, 19571, will :,on kirdl,, provide tie City of Fan `min Obispo with a prowsel covering fegel eerrirna in commotion with our prmored pmrking ftetriet. You imloeteri 1111t the total Coot would be In tTr^ neighborhood of f1,OW, or if ttr project diA not go ahead, tie coat of amparing the petition add preliminary la Cal work world be billed an an actual ooat bunis. t;e ass srti.cipatinr, a total bowl is" of nacre ;' 3000000 to 4ij'N0,(). It wan a plaasure mootin, yat, am we W121 be looklm forward to tearing from you in the near fl,ture on this ratter. Sinoeraly yours, 1luhard L. Miller Administrative Offimr HI)MICS + q[gaD ccfn6 ..tm D.JACKSON FAUSTMAN C ONSVITINO 1R.11IC ENGINEER ] . OI♦ i00E A n0 SACRAMENTO 23.CALIIORNIA July 15, 1957 To the Honorable The City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo, California Gentlemen: GL. R f• G�i•Ene ] '/001f Pursuant to the request of City Administrative Officer Richard Hiller, information is submitted up -dating the statistics contained in my July 23, 1956, report on 'Off -Street Parking Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo". In this letter report, the park- ing plan is modified with respect to the sites recommended in the July 23, 1956, report so as to depict the current thinking of inter- ested parties in the central district. I concur with the modified parking plan shown herein. The statistics which follow are referenced by page number to the basic report. Page I 1957 POPULATION City of San Luis Obispo 18,000 San Luis Obispo County 65,000 L 1 1 1 ----- i I SA COUFT 1 I A , I , _CNOFFO -••-7 1 W ! N I 1 1 I aARoe�,` - 1 1 ]F0F0 ST I, 1 LFIIONO 1 1 1 1 , � 1 ' LEGEND I 1 J<by 1 1 NIYOYO 1 � ]T 1 aMoo-° LOo a'N o-ITMr MUNICIPAL OFF-STREET PARKING SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 0 JACKSON FAUSTMAN CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER SACRAMENTO, CALIF JULY 1957 FIGURE Page 6 ON 7 P SDI ON O P� O m O d N N N N n vl O O O O O b m O O O O O N n O O T t0 O O c0 op O O� m O �O N ep p. m O N S �O N N S O1 V1 m m V7 S N N S N N N N F o 11 Z'y( N N N N a inl 00 O OI0 O �h v1 O O O O O m W O N m V1 p ' O I M m O M S N P O O V PI PO O w m O w y N N Z w O O O O O a �nl O O OI 0 O .. V O N v� m N v m Q OF N N N N d L c d F d N C .Yi O N u w y d b R W u z d Y C u M v v d i d M L Y V V ry �a L q N d� fy y R' b u Vi q U d W y w C C Y QQ eO m QQ�� N m C a N O W R H pt C C � OF R V tJ F m P] Page 7 CURB PARKING METER REVENUES Annual Average No. Revenue Year Revenue of Meters per Meter 1951 $37,859.50 452 $83.75 1952 40,771.32 467 87.30 1953 39,800.76 463 85.96 1954 38,037.13 451 84.34 1955 38,545.85 451 85.46 1956 37,311.89 456 81.82 1957 (Through June) 17,473.89 479 - Page 8 OFF-STREET PARKING INVENTORY ADD: City Lot No. 3 - 58 spaces, opened December, 1956 52 short -time spaces - 1 hour/5C, 2 hour limit 6 long-time spaces - $24.00/quarter Page 9 GROSS REVENUES - CITY OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES Lot No. 1 Lot No. 2 Lot No. 3 1952 $1,208.75 Dec., 1955 $ 220.47 Dec., 1956 $ 117.74 (Half month) 1953 1,812.36 1956 3,030.97 1954 1,721.43 1957 (Through 1957 (Through June) 1,278.22 June)1,064.74 1955 1,856.14 1956 2,326.34 1957 (Through June) 1,232.02 3 Page 11 PROPOSED OFF-STREET PARKING PUN (Refer to Figure 1 attached) Parking Site Legal Description Spaces Present Land Use A a. Parcel 4, Blk 527, except 65 Dwelling, garage and the N. 35' to a depth of locker building 100, b. 25' strip lying W. of the E. 40' of Parcel 2, Blk 527 C. Parcel 5, Blk 527 D a. Parcels 1 and 3, Blk 433 Vacant Parking Lot 95 1 and 2-story business buildings and service station 160 TABLE I (Follows Page 12) ESTIMATED COST OFF-STREET PARKING LOTS Appraised value of site Clearing, grading, paving, marking, etc. (3) Parking meters Professional fees (4%) Contingencies (4) Interest during con- struction (5A for 4 months) Lot A $75,180 (1) 12,000 4,870 3,680 4.790 Lot D $220,000 (2) 24,000 7,120 10,040 26,120 4,790 $292,070 Car spaces 65 95 Cost/car space $ 1,570 $ 3,070 i $102,200 PROGRAM TOTAL $295,180 (1) Under option (2) Appraisal by City Assessor (3) Estimate by D. Jackson Faustman, Consulting Traffic Engineer (4) Contingencies - 5% on Lot A, 107. on Lot D 36,000 11,990 13,720 30,910 y $394,270 160 $ 2,460 4 Page 14 REVENUE PER SPACE PER DAY Gross Revenue Spaces 1st Year Ilth Year Lot A 65 $0.15 $0.30 Lot D 95 0.15 0.30 ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSE PROGRAM Lot A Lot D TOTAL Enforcement $ 800 $ 1,000 $ 1,800 Insurance 50 100 150 Audit (Fiscal Agent) 150 250 400 Utilities 70 100 170 Lot Repair and Maintenance 150 200 350 Meter Repair, Replace- ment, and Collection 840 1,200 2,040 Contingencies (10%) 200 300 500 $ 2,260 $ 3,150 $ 5,410 Page 15 CURB METER REVENUES FROM PROPOSED PARKING DISTRICT Total curb meters in central area 479 Total curb meters in district 441 (479 less 20 meters outside district, plus 18 meters an Court Street absorbed by Lot D) Gross revenue - central area meters $ 38,000 Gross revenue - meters to be eliminated 2,500 Gross revenue - curb meters in proposed district 35,500 j ' • TABLE II (Follows Page 16) ESTIMATED GROSS REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND NET REVENUES PROPOSED PARKING LOTS LOT A LOT D Gross Net Gross Net Year Revenue Expense Revenue Revenue Expense Revenue 1 $ 2,980 $ 2,260 $ 720 $ 4,360 S 3,150 $ 1,210 2 3,280 2,260 1,020 4,800 3,150 1,650 3 3,580 2,260 1,320 5,240 3,150 2,090 4 3,880 2,260 1,620 5,680 3,150 2,530 5 4,180 2.260 1,920 6,120 3,150 2,970 6 4,480 2,260 2,220 6,560 3,150 3,410 7 4,780 2,260 2,520 7,000 3,150 3,850 8 5,080 2,260 2,820 7,440 3,150 4,290 9 5,380 2,260 3,120 7,880 3,150 4,730 10 5,680 2,260 3,420 8,320 3,150 5,170 11 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 12 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 13 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 ' 14 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 15 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 16 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 17 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 18 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 19 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 20 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 21 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 22 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 23 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 24 5,980 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 25 5,960 2,260 3,720 8,760 3,150 5,610 Total $133,000 $56,500 $76,500 $194,800 $78,750 $116,050 Average $ 5,320 $ 2,260 $ 3,060 $ 7,790 $ 3,150 $ 4,640 6 TABLE II (Follows Page 16) (Continued) ESTIMATED GROSS REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND NET REVENUES PROPOSED PARKING LOTS PROGRAM TOTAL Gross Net Year Revenue E, x ep nee Revenue 1 $ 7,340 $ 5,410 $ 1,930 2 8,080 5,410 2,670 3 8,820 5,410 3,410 4 9,560 5410 4,150 5 10,300 5:410 4,890 6 11,040 5,410 5,630 7 11,780 5,410 6,370 8 12,520 5, 410 7,110 9 13,260 5,410 7,850 30 14,000 5,410 8,590 11 14,740 5,410 9,330 12 14,740 5,410 9,330 13 14,740 5,410 9,330 14 14,740 5,410 9,330 15 14,740 5,410 9,330 16 14,740 5,410 9,330 17 14,740 5,410 9,330 18 14,740 5,410 9,330 19 14,740 5,410 9,330 20 14,740 5,410 9,330 21 14,740 5,410 9,330 22 14,740 51410 9,330 23 14,740 5,410 9,330 24 14,740 5,410 9,330 25 14J40 5.410 9,330 Total $327,800 $135,250 $192,550 Average $ 13,110 $ 5,410 $ 7,700 Rq"ectf lly aub t[ed, DJP:b Jackson Pauetmen FVI:' M LEADING TO INITIATION OF PROCEEDINI9 BT CITY OP' St.N _— LES OBISPO To PC" PA i o u CY- PA D '�T _ M IM.+ The following outline of stops taken in recent years by the City of San Luis Obispo in working toward a solution of the coa®udty's parking prwlerr has been prepared at the request of the City Council for the information of ;11 concerned. The city's off-street parking program has been worked on by many groups including but not limited to the council, the planning commission, chamber of co!,74res, aitisons cmmittees, and staff members of the city. The net results have been gratifying, in that the city nou has three metered lots with 24h off- street parking spaces plus two unmetered lots with 705 spaces. These 322 Spaces acquired at a oust of more than $200,000.00 have done much to relieve congeotion =nd ;provide for customer parking in the downtown area, but the problem is still far from solved. CITIZM7S GOAMTTEE APPOINTM. ,me of the early steps taken by the city council was the appointment of a five mac citizens committee in June, 1953 to study tin perking problemu rids committee applied itself diligently and was aided In its studies by the arotd.- tectural engineering department at Cal Poly. In a separate study, prepared uader° the direction of George Hasslsla, bead of the architectural engineering denertmont, published in April, i95h, it was pointed out that there were 1,?46 on -street and off-street spaces available in the downtown area. It was felt that a mininua of 700 additional spaces wars required, and a priority list of locations for off-street parking Iota wan provided. The citizens comuittes completed its r�,or ; in September, 195L which also euggested certain locations for parkdny �. �'v i)CV a10v1f47t. APRRAISER HIM. In the meantime, the city had retained Mr. Peter C. W. Patoch of Santa Barbara for the purpose of making appraisele on certain parcels in the downtown area. Mr. Patsch also included in his report an opinion that the city was short some 172 to 465 off-street parking spaces at that time. The appraisal report provided the basis for negotiation on acquisition of several parcels which were later developed into city parking lots. fE'MORAENT OF PAAKINO L0T NO. 2. Parking Lot No. 2 consisting of 57 spaces was acquired, developed and opened to the public in December, 1955. At first it was planned to lease- purchase the property, but since no"" were available in the off-street Pa-6dng reserve, the final decision was to purchase the cacessary properties outright. OFFM OF LOAN. At about this time, a merchant group bscveo interested in providing still Sore off-street parking and expressed willingness to help stretch the moneys available in the eity's off-street parking reserve by pledging additional Duds on .a loan basis. By mar, 1956, 515,500 was pledged on the condition that it be used in the vicinity of Chorro and Pacific Streets and with a time limit of December $l, 1956. As it turned out, this property did not become available in time, and the moneys which were pledged were ss --r collected. t ZUE PAWINJ DISTRICT. Another development was the appearance before the Carncil by a group of dcvntown morchants and property own" in March, 1956 urgiry that the city fora an n.aesucent district for off-street parking purposes. ita council agreed to investigate the possibilities and idred D. Jackson Panriarx, traffic osgineer from Sacramento and Stone & Youngberg, municipal Tinancial cc-��al.tejrta fron "an Francisco, to make a tbsiough st,dy of tip parl,-:tt needs. _AREINO LOT No. In the meantime, the city vas Presented with the enpor6iudty of acquiring the C, A. Plain property on Monterey Street which was developed as A:unicipa2 Parking Lot No. 3. Pureruso of this let took a Beat deal of Pressure off the Mission Garage corner which was being Proposed both as a pari-Ing lot and as a micSion gardens project by different groups of local citiaens, Arraaas"n;z Na^e wade to pay for the Mono Property daring tfues differer,,t Calendar yasxs, and the lot was constructed and oPenad in Ou".eobsr, 1955 providing fall additional off-street spaces. FAl6'IMAN95 ENGIIZERING '1r:, °aua7+oan's angineerYng report was published in 1956. It Showe d 1,L5h ori.ating Parking apaoes in the downtown area, and set forth a Proposal for tbreo additional lots totaling 112 spaces, His report was distributed to various 077;;s for stuffy, but no important action was taken until February, 195'1 when the Chamber of Caa¢orce parking and traffic cOrmittao :net with the city Council to discuss the report. The committee ecprosacd the thought t`iat the projoe:t as recomaxsnded did net go far enough Jr. solving the problear. The lot proposed for the corner of Chorao and iscific was Sine, but the committee urged that Zonsideration alno be given to the area behL�d the A. larson Hotel bounded by Osos, Riguera, Court and Monterey Streets. In revisring Its finruui.al. position, the ro"unil stated thpt the city hm. adwusted all its Wdsilna off-street parking reserves for at leant a year in advance, bxt if su.tficient interest was expressed in going ahead on the larger project on au asss2mment district basis, the city would be willing to Proe9ad. M.R. FA—IST1AN CC,YCUPS MITT Ck3At$IA GROUP. !1r. Fa4`stmsn woe ther0f0re asked to ravine his report which was done by Jaly, 1957. Tie rsvised report included t o loW totaling 1,60 spaces. .,...,�..L ')a'e lastlpn c2 .d.s report, Stone grad Younabetrg *„re aa2 ,anted to I study his proposal and report on its financial feasibility. In their report to the city suimitted an September h, 1957, Stan and Youngberg found that a Project totaling $420,000 and providing for sufficient reserves and eonttnngericies was feasible provided that the council would agree to forego recovery of parking enforcement expenses from parking meter receipts until after bond interest and redemption payments had been muds. Ttds the council agreed to do. The priority for use of perking motor receipts was set as follows, 1. Payment of meter operation and collection expenses. 2. Payment of bond redemption and interest charges. 3. %oimbu.esuant to the city for enforcement expsnaes, if sufficient moneys remained. The fiaaneial consultanta recommended certain other provisions which vore Incorporated in petitions prepared by the legal firm of Orrick, Orhlgidat, dierring- ton and Sutcliffe and circulated among mambere of the business conmucdty. ;Under torma of the petitions which were signed by property owners -Athla the dist-rict owning more than 50% of the area and assecaod valuation, the city council would servo as the perking commission to provide managemnt of the district over the yaars. Under the terms of the 1951 Act, property owners within the district could be tamod in an amount not to aooeed 75 cents per $100 of aosessed valuation in Bess parking inter receipts loan operating expenses were Snuufficient to pay bond service coats during any am year. However, the city :ru+ assured that It would be extremely unlikely that each ar, assessmait would veer occur. Property owners would merely be strndirC b4Jxd the project tc provide additional aseurn for tho bond buyer, and it is aeswaao;d that the interest rats would therefore be that much lower. CONCLDSICN. The city feels that the proposed parking lots would do much to stimulate bnainess in the downtown area and that the businessman and property owner have mph to gain and nothing to lose from the proposed project. The city has retained the beat possible advisors in every atop of the Procedure and has followed their advice to the letter. Tim council has also been very responsive to the wishes of the businessmen tbmiselves and on thin basis, the city has alreadly Invested several thousand dollars in the project. We fool it in a good plan and sincerely and enthusiastically present it for your consideration. 1.t this time, we would like to thank the Chaabar of Carmerce for its fine Cooperation in halping the city to provide off-etmet parking In the downtown Y'e are especially grateful to Marl Carpenter, who served on the c¢Kglmrl eitizem3 C0=31ttee and to gold Kjasecyo, who is chairman of the chamber ::ar°k ng and traffic committee and who has bsrn of invaluable help to us for ,sW years. 5....> f v w" °''A1 s'i, :Sa'i ad �! ( 3 6 .*?,x r�`x.`d F.-' " •� 6 •+�d"N -Nrb#t . 3r? S, 5�ki %. � .�,» ♦Y 'i if a, itl':Y ft ,'sn" t* Awau vu ." p , t{' AST. �.Qx*T�iti i�. Y3 Pr�iaY :wRi ' #D" " ,,;..?_i �.,xf i.�!".�sx...�.. •d,s:". ��n^iy+�n �usxY't'.+;nS r,�g>n.:.x'.W '� :^Qoo 4 s 7ni•» k6, J':d4 Sawl` s t ;. i s $.w t i",y rr0 x x :. .,0 p :atfr+@xWt'Y 'G40k p sU'-t I- PFjGi3'tX,F G6 f'". "�Akbi Va.t± ° 1.�;..T .Ltd ..n ,.::rig ai -.Sirs ia.k .. i 1 e+'. .. P.: a.5'. +. 1Fy #ae"WfA�: b,,. '3�s ' KYi'#} ln; Ypr9t xAd!„Arjan"q >'. , 14 '.i.6 ,..'»1W9�'. r16.. sY ka :-M PO ..cm Ct A64' ke'tw66fi+'wn"-n b"n11 FnF i ,1 a%•-{v f % ♦ la:v. .y, aiM"f t"t GB "..' 4 .a n'1d:�' pr-'3tAAu.X7tG'--Trt,Y» flat %xft: tY>trx to xtk PY4x%-'`df:�Q..t,1.1d too 'ibx i}%.',ti'':1vro#.of V s CbArmt, SAioct w Amy odti!'Aom or :NW9".nlL"um to a sn:,,".o-a 1 tf + �•:u�4r�:s :aa:.omnu, t.Y oao> ssct .wtt4m a@ iouAm4 f or - rriNaPE' 4idRQiLr,.al14m . r , - h . `MlfwiY�• B�' S i e • t ,. .'kfah* 90s1l ts"tf .. - ;5%e;rt afia:¢`+SAIM Mr leAr A tVf. 4F , m* "Y' US t "amradk m3itt"a or r,—Im, to msj. tw U4 oil -4tr, vo V mt 8.e A-Mfi*w 4r t8M f* out Pei Letter to Don Davis -2- May 21, 1957 teeter receipts will take care of the bond requirments under ordinary circumstances with the possible exception of the fYrst year. Please let us know if there is any additional infotr:ation you will need. Sincerely yours, 41 liichard D. Miller Administrative Offirer i2D]L•cs Encl. 0 CITY OF ZN 'ne 1P d;i •i DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Mav 20, 1957 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of San Luis Obispo Gentlemen: • )BISPO The Council -Chamber Committee appointed at the study session of May 13, 1957 to studv and recommend to the Council the boundaries of the proposed Parking Assessment District for the downtown area, met on Friday morning, May 17, 195? to make the study requested. After a field inspection of the boundaries recommended by D. Jackson Faustman and the boundaries recommended by the parking committee of the Chamber of Commerce, it was decided by your committee to accept the boundaries recommended by D. Jackson Faustman with the following additions: 1. Addition to the district of the entire block between Higuera Street and Marsh Street and Broad and Nipomo Streets. 2. Addition to the district of the entire block bounded by Pacific Street and Pismo Street and Chorro and Garden Streets. 3. Addition to the district of the City Hall, City Hall Parking Lot and Library area. 4. Addition to the district of the S} of the block facing Palm Street and bounded by Morro Street and Chorro Street. NOTE: All shaded areas on the attached map are additions to the original district recommended by D. Jackson Faustman. The proposed District boundaries are outlined in red on the attached map. Respectfully submitted, 'Jels Beck, Councilman Harald K7aerbye, Chamber of Commerce Representative J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk NB,HK,JHF:co Enclosure; District Boundary Map CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SAN LUIS OBISPO CALIFORNIA May First 1 9 5 7 Hon. Mayor Fred H. Lucksinger Members of City Council City Hall San Lids Obispo, California Gentlemen: With further reference to the efforts of the committee for Parkin¢ a Traffic within this Chamber slanted at the creation of a PARKING ASSESSKM DISTRICT in the downtown area of :;an Luis Obispo, we are pleased to submit attached a map of our city with suggested boundaries outlined by the committee which it feels might encompass the area suitable for such a district. You will recall a recent study session held in the council chambers with members of this committee and also a verbal present- ation made by its chairman, Mr. Harold hSaerbye, in which results of this committee's exploratory work was outlined. .Additional study has beam made by the committee in setting up the boundaries as indicated in the map attached. It is the feeling of the committee that it has accomplished necessary spade work, including a sampling of opinion among a considerable portion of the property owners who might be affected and that little further can be done until action or decision by the council has been resolved. It awaits, therefore, your further advice. Sincerely in the public interest, -W MART ii MITHA� sec'ty. - hgr. MR/md Copies: Hal h jaerbys Merl Carpenter HAROLD F. KJAk2BYE Chairman .a MAY ! 9;I7 REC EIVer) City cj�'k ow Two mnsicn nuns" ... Aiission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa -Founded 1772 OFF- STREET PARKING SAN LUIS OBISPQ CALIFORNIA 0 JACKSON F.USTII.N CONSULTING TNYFK E.S..E[. SACII.IIENTO, CALIF Jmvr ISM SIEm 1 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SAN LUIS OBISPO CALIFORNIA November tenth, 1956 This is probably the MOST IMPORTANT letter you will re- ceive from ANY SOURCE this year, for it concerns your INVEST- MENT in downtown real estate in San Luis Obispo and the trends which affect that investment. Please read it CAREFULLY. We think of our city now as consisting of over 17,000 per- sons. IN REALITY, we serve as the HUB and SHOPPING CENTER for more than 35,000 people, as any downtown merchant will tell you who serves customers each day from all points in the county. These people travel to San Luis Obispo in CARS, as do local shoppers when visiting the downtown area. Anyone familiar with conditions knows that there will be no lessening of this factor in the foreseeable future. Yet NO PROVISION is being made for ADEQUATE PARKING for this ever-increasing host of rural and ur- ban purchasers. Our NARROW STREETS have long since ceased to handle the problem, nor has it been solved by the recent addi- tion of several small sized parking lots. The situation is MORE CRITICAL than is generally realized. While no definite trend toward de -centralization of our business district or the establishment of area shopping centers has as yet set in, it CAN COME, and SOONER than many of us real- ize. The recent building of a local unit for a large .grocery chain on Marsh street, MANY BLOCKS from our central district and the huge building program now in progress in the Foothill -Santa Rosa street area COULD foretell the future. BOTH developments, you will note, have made AMPLE arrangements for ADEQUATE: PARKING. We do not like to think of EMPTY STORE FRONTS and DEPRESSED REAL ESTATE VALUES in our downtown shopping district but it CAN HAP- PEN. AMPLE OFF-STREET PARKING IN CENTRAL San Luis Obispo IS AN ABSOLUTE ESSENTIAL! And the time to ACT is NOW! Your City Government, alert to this situation, has secured a survey and report, prepared by D. Jackson Faustman, consulting traffic engineer of Sacramento. The report outlines the San Luis Obispo PROBLE4 and suggests several alternate CURES. obi n,. assmoN ..n... , MWim San Lois Obispo L Tobu—Foosx" 1"2 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE • ... SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA (CmOm, wm) • The Traffic & Parking Committee of this Chamber, after an analysis of the report, has moved to recommend the CURE best tailored to the needs and the capabilities of this community. Under the Parking District Act of 1951, a parking assess- ment district may be formed, with boundaries fixed for the area to be benefited. Bonds may be issued against this district and the capital raised by their sale used to acquire one or more LARGE, CENTRALLY LOCATED off-street parking areas. REVENUES from the meters may be used to retire the bonds and to meet the interest obligations on them. IT IS NOT VERY COLIPLICATED! A digest of the Parking District Act of 1951 is attached for your reference and we suggest your careful perusal. BUT, while your City Government is alert to the situation and to the N`i: D, it is also loathe to initiate a proposal of this type without some expression of INTEREST from the property owners affected. And it is to that end that the Traffic & Park- ing Committee of this Chamber is working. If you SEE the need for a solution as we do, if you RECOG- NIZE the situation as we recognize it and if you, too, want to maintain a central HUB of this community in the downtown area, where values and invested capital may continue to be enhanced as the years progress, then your support at this time will ma- terially assist us. Prompt return of the enclosed card will activate your City Government into the preparation and circulation of an initiatory petition. COLT IITTEE: Merl Carpenter C. C. Humphrey Walter Pfleghaar Carl Seneker Howard Bowen R. I. Corcoran Carl Hysen Dick Sleight Robert Peters Jack Fisher Tom Rice Chas. Wiseman Bert Brown Joe Manfrini Maurice Fitzgerald Maynard Marquardt H. F. ILTAERBYE Chairman Traffic & Parking July ID, 1956 D. Jackson Frustran .,.E Comulting Engineer 1243 merian wq Sacrasento, California Dear Jacks We appreciated your trip to San Luis Obispo last evening very much, and i think the diacussion with the Council served a very useful purpose in brin!,Ang us all up to date. We will be looking for your information an traffic -counting techniques. In this regard, the police chief has indicated that we may poesib]y -.. be able to borrow eight eoumte:^e free the City Of Pasadena, in which case there probably would be no question of how we would Cc about having the orua*.s made. Here is the other infor�wsticn you req�ated, na 90 foot fronleea on Osten and 120 feet on Marsh hen been valued at aB4O00 for the land, 811,Ooo for the buildings, or a total of 629,000, rounded off to 430,000, The 132 feat on Oeoe Street and 120 feet on Higuara bass been valued at 355,000 for the land, #25,000 for the buildings, or a total of aO,OOo. The property to the rear of the theatre representini, a 96 foot frontage on F119wr'a with a depth of 60 fact has been valued at i12,5W, Sincerely yours, richa.rd D. !14-Uer Administrative Officer R69see ccs D. F. itCjwrc July 3, 1956 D. Jackson Pauntman . 1243 Marian way Sacramento. California Dear Jacks Reference your letter of June 30, 1956, we have already gone to the expense of having an appraisal made on Block 527, Parcel 4 at a cost of $250. The amount of the appraisal was $i.0,000. Our city assessor has it valued at $40,440. We wonder if it will be sufficient for the time beinF to give you the aesessorts appraisal on Block 433, Pacels 1 and 3. The amount here is $170,760. I think it would be a good idea for us to arrange a study meeting with the City Council on your next trip. I know they would be interested in your progress to date. Sincerely yours, Administrative Officer RDMscs 'R. 0 JACKSON F.AUSTMAN C C N 0 U L T I N C TRAFFIC ENGINEER MAw1AN WAY ®AvwAMC NTO, CALIFORNIA June 30, 1956 Mr. Richard D. Miller Administrative Officer City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Dear Mr. Miller: My parking studies have reached the point where site appraisals appear indicated. It is requested that an appraisal be obt"ined of the following: 1. Block 433, Parcel 1 and 3 (This is the entire block bounded by Court, Monterey, Dens and Higuera Streets, excluding the theater property.) 2. Block 527, Parcel 4 (80' x 219.3'). I shall be in San Luis Obispo some time during the next two weeks, just when I am not certain. I shall contact you to discuss the results of my analysis of the parking data. Sincerely, D. Jackson Faustman DJF:nc wcmiTcwcv cNm Nccw M m..AN,vu nv I- E enses to be reimbursed City £ran proceeds of Parking District Bonds Fiscal Year 19 5-5b 7 - Wa` Nl8-to Stone & Youngberg Retainer 51,000.00 6-4-56 2325 Maurice Fitzgerald Appraisal of Pezzoni parcel 250.00 19 6-57 519 D. Jackson Faustman Engineering Report 3,000.00 19 7-58 13-1-57 312 D. Jackson Faustman Printing Expense, Revised Report 74.75 11-18-57 1104 Stone and Youngberg Financial Report ?,000.00 1958-59 7�1- r 23 Telegram -Tribune Advertise for Parking District (Legal) 181.27 12-15-58 1232 Peter C. W. Patsch Appraisals, Lots A & D 1,768.00 3-2-59 1806 Title Ins. & Trust 25, strip lying Co. W, of E. 40, of Parcel 2, Blk. 527 13,853.42 3-2-59 1807 Title Ins. & Trust Parcel 5, Blk. Co. 527 25,337.84 4-20-59 2124 Title Ins. & Trust Supplement 1806 Co. (deed, taxes & 4-20-59 2036 U.S. Porcelain Enamel Interest) Enter & Exit Sign 72.20 30.75 4-20-59 2037 Freeman Sign Service 2 signs for parking 4-20-59 2057 Deal Parking Meter Co. lot 21 parking meters 70.00 968.24 54-59 2320 San Luis Mill & Lumber Co. Lumber for signs 11.86 1959-60 2-7- 1197 Title Ins. & Trust Litigation guarantees, Carpenter and McFadden nroperties, Parcels 1 and 3, Blk. 433 250.00 3-7-60 1819 Wm. M. Houser Jr. Retainer for legal services in condemnation actions 500.00 1960-61 T-T-m- 211 Phil Porter Survey & map Carpenter 4-19-60 525 Jos. Arsenio property Appraise Pezzoni 362.00 parcel 500.00 Total to date $ 50.230.33 1 rust NiRealy re PEAL ESTATE LOAN$ INSURANCE Rae .OXT,.EY STREET - T.Le VMOM. feeS .AN LUIS OBISPO CALIFORNIA February 23, 1956 Mr. Richard D. 11111er, City Adninietrator San Luis Obispo, Californiu near Mr. Miller: An escrow has been created at the Title Insurance & Trust Co. wherein merchants are agreeing to loan the city approx— imately $1j,000.00, nrovidad that the city proceeds to acquire that property to the roar of the Masonic Tc.pls with frontage on Chorre Street, In order that you nay be posted on the Progress towards Petting the agreement signed by the merchants, we are reporting as follows: The following companies have agreed to the loan as set forth opposite their nave, and have deposited 101 of the totul amount of their loan with the Title Insurance t- Trust Co, Riley's Department Store ( Mr. Humphrey) $2,000.00 Jack Fischer, the owner of the property on which the Fill's Stationery Stnra Is locate@. 500.00 beryl Carpenter, the owner of Hill's Stationery Store. 1,000.00 Mr. Peters, the owner of the Union Hardware Store, 500.00 :Ir. Hosrntlelu, thn owner of Christine's 500.00 Title Insurance & Trust Co. 750.00 Leonore Smith 500.00 The following rerchants have agreedto the amount opposite their names, but th31r money has not been deroalted in escrow end they have not as yet signed their instructions at the Title Co. Seenrity Title 750.00 I Affilxsd fed1j Ce. REAL ESTATE - LOANS INSURANCE 096 MONTCR[T STREIT T[LEPMON9 SB74 SA LUIS OeISPO CALIFORNIA Page.-2 — Mr. Richard D. Miller, City Administrator Security Bank t1,000.00 Long Piano Co. 500.00 Clarence Brown 500.00 .Fitzgerald Rotate 500.00 NcYahan's Furniture Store 1.000.00 Youtgocery Ward Co. 5.000.00 The following concerts have indicated that they are going to come into the project, tut the amount has not yet been determined. J.C. Penney Sears & Roebuck Maino Constriction Co. Doctors Sherman. Treadvell, and Aadregg We bolieve that the only merchant who has not been contacted is the Evans Brokerage Co. 7ou will rota that we have already on denceit $575.00 representing t5,750.00 in loans to Lhe city. That there is $9,250.00 that has boon pledged but to not yet on de— posit wi'.h the Title Co. When these have been 44poeited we will have $15,000.00 and it to not unlikely Ghat when the others have beer. heard from that the total amount of the loan will Probably run betereea $17,000.00 and $19.0006 Yours very truly. hfk:dg H.F. Rtaerbye CITY OF SAN LUIOBISPO CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS November 23, 1955 Office of City Engineer Mr. Richard Miller Administrative Officer City of San Luis Obispo Dear Dick: As requested by Mayor Lucksinger I have made an investigation of proposed parking facilities on the C. A. Maino property located on Monterey Street between Chorro and Morro Streets. Zr. Maino proposes to construct a building with a frontage of approximately 54 ft and a depth of approximately 140 ft. The roof would be approximately 15 ft above ground level on Monterey Street, which would mean tnat the area in back of the proposed building would be approximately level with the building roof line. Therefore, it would be practical to provide parking on the building roof to supplement parking area to the rear of the building. This would provide a total area of about 60ft in width by 280 ft in depth for a maximum of about LO parking spaces. I called the Engineering kirm of Simpson and Stratta, structural engineers, who engineered the proposed building and they stated that an additional cost of between $21,800. and $29,100. would be re- quired to strengthen the building for roof top parking. This figure is con- firmed by the Maino Construction Company who estimates an additional cost of about $25,000. Under the proposed plan Mr. Maino would provide a pedestrian stairway and walkway from the rear of the proposed building out to Monterey Street, vehicle access would be provided from Palm Street. Mr. Maino has proposed the following cooperative arrangements should the City wish to proceed with the development of the above plan for parking. The City to pay the additional cost of construction required to strengthen the building for parking. 2. Mr. Maino would grant twenty-five (25) years free use of the parking area behind the proposed building. Mr. Maino would grant the City a ninety-nine (99) year lease for parking on the proposed building roof in return for a waiver of tax on the property only (not on improvements). Mr. Maino has suggested that the City investigate the possibility of utiliz- ing adjoining, properties for additional parking areas. The property toward Chorro Street is owned by Mr. Muzio and the property toward Morro is owned by Mr. Johnson. I would recaamend that the possibilities, as suggested, be investigated with the thought of at least attaining additional access to the proposed "wino parking area. Richard Miller November 23, 1955 page 2 The absolute maximum number of parking stalls which could be dev^.loped on Mr. Maine's property, including the building roof, is estimated at forty (40). Some problems are involved, particularly in providing a turn -around at the Monterey Street end on the roof top parking; however, there are no insurmountable problems. In discussing this matter with Mr. Simpson, of the firm of Simpson and Stratta, I learned that multiple storied parking structures can be constructed at a cost of $1000. to $1200. per parking stall. In many instances the construction of this type of structure, which would provide more intensive use of ground area, is con. siderably more economical than the purchase of additional area for single story or ground level parking. ^-his information should be of great interest to us in developing cost comparisons on future parking reguirenonts. Yours verb; tn,ly, r,, HOMER RAMLIN City Engineer CiM/lb 2 Nay 16, 19K5 ;ynarable Kayor. ead City Council Swi Luis Obispo' California Cerhlomenr This will si'. l.emmrt Mr. Edward's roosot letter in regard to tiro proposed off atreat purldng lot near 3road mud I4Rrs"n. We met witty rir. E. Taylor SrAb this morning anal 'iantatively sgreed an the following Points: (1) That he frond sell us the 22 feet from tfs rear PrpPcriy U1110 for 110 appraised value of MWON (2) He Would give Ile an easameat for a pedestrian waMWW in return for err oaeamant of one c.r width from the parking lot to the remainder of Ill.e pr�_wkv behind his boar easemsmts 'to be suhjeot to Oe Jl'ation 'sy either party on 30 days written notion, (3) The City would pavo the alliag and tho rmr .i cow; of his proPpriy and would mad_rtain the alley as lsng as tlx: oaaomaute wore in effect, (4) The City would tales do.z: tha C;' link fance at the roar of the Paterson Auto Parts bu::l.eine rumring parallel. to Marsh azout and deliver it to a point on 'tr. Smith's Property. (5) The City would but3.d a burrpar strip suffiCiontly far back so as to prevent aucroaehv art of autar*4142 onto ibe remaI der of 2tr, Smith's Property. {S. &;1th !as agreed to proceed iil.tr.r the title e060ch vi'Gn M advins his that we are ready to go ahead, Mr. Kean and ;cis group are wormy oo a trust armlgemmrt to hams too ownership and receipt o£ pa-men:a from the Cit,,: on the imposed Maggie Brown property leaso,-purchase, Respectfully yo'srs, Warren Q. Edwardp Counoilw Ricnard D.:'Ulor RMOUtive SaCrot„r7 „eigue of California cities Hotel Claremont 8aildi7g Berkeley 5, California HarIVISY, California may ib, 1955 we. George L. Andre city Attorney San I.ui.s Obiepa, California Dear 11r„ Ardret 'Chia is in reply, to your letter of Peay 4, enclrsing a copy of a proposed lease with option to p@ehaos a,_r e:aunt for the. acquisition of land to he devoted to par.<ing perposee, avd roguoeting our opinion on tits vnilidity thereof, It is assumed that the real property in gi+estlon oonsisea solal.y of land acrt is not tnproved and Slather that the agreement dose not contemplate any improvercent of Via prnperty in queotim by the lesser, Under the foregoing, aa5umod state of fnets, wo sre inclined to believe that there are some substantial doubts as to the va111ditY of the agreement. In the first place, the agreement. does not contain any fiwMAg by the city owned that the rental amounns are the actual and true value of the use of the promlaw for each eyar. This has generally been coalute rad to be a e"irable pro►isitaa in a lease agreement. of thin type to avoid any inferome of the agreement beinv an install- ment puroi we contract. Again, the amortisation of the total villas of the land sinus 45,000 in a 1(-;yesr period might strain tits credulity or a court because tiara is no basis vpon shish there ern be any assumed depreciation of land as distinct from is.pzla�rxnte. The carman typo of agre^nexat baaos the decreasing option price on the ssaumed depreciation of the iMrover..ent. Hors, wbere there are no litprovements, it is not possible to establish a depreciation schedule for the purchase option smounto. If it can be assumed or foeurd within a degree of assurance that the pvtowt market vales of the land is substanitally in arms of LAa $55,�-00 figure, than thorn might appear to be eons good reason for asauming the validity of tn'_s type of agreement. However, even is that event, it would appear highly desirable to establish equal annual rental payments accoa:penied by a finding that such amounts repreeent the true value of the ise of the land by t4re city, In other worde, the first ineSa:ilxnt of $10,000 has the sarmarhe of a "down payment” which a raoievtng cn'Ort might ba able to aei:e upon as a bas Ls for characterising the A,,-rae- ment as a diagetised irutallment purchase contract.. If it is deaired to acquire the :and at its actin zarket value over a 10••year period, it would appear desirable to consider the osa cf a more -iodarate :nn•-al renieil paYmnt at l.azrmr 7nschase I ption &mourns zocoenpenied by the cstahliehment of a capitol outlevs fund pursuant to Sections 53730 at ssq, of the Gevarn- mnnt Cods. This approach is desorioed i.r dmewtvt mcre `)Rba" in the Santa Barbara paper which Howard 0ardnor infores no t,as Csen forwarded to you. Sang that I have not ,am able tc devote mom+ research on this problem, but I sariovaly feel that in its present fom it would be subject to attack,: S ineere ly, Is/ Ier3a Keller Associate Counsel May 16, 1955 Moorabla Mayor and Cit Council San Luis Obispo, California GemtlomenI This will supplement Rx. Edward's recant letter in regard to the proposed off street parking lot near Broad and Yarctu. to met with Mx. E. Taylor Smith this morri-ng and tentatively agread on, the following pointer (1) That he vroul.d sell ue t*x 22 feat from the roar property line for t;m appraised value of $1600.00. (2) its would give nw an saoeroent for a pedeetrien W211Cauy in return for an easement of one car width from ttn parking lot to the remain3ar of his pruparty behind his build!-ug, both eaaMentm to be subject to ccnoellation by either party on 30 clays written notice. (3) The City would navy tk:e alley ant the ra�irder of Pia pro,n..rty and would maintain, the alley as; long as the o ,s -Onts were in effact. (4) The City weld take dot.:, tha chain link fence at the roar of the Peterson l,uto Parts building ranting parallel to Marah Street and deliver it to a point on Mr. Smith's property. (5) The City would build a bumper strip sufficiently far back no as ' to prevent encroachment of automobiles onto the remainder of Mr. Smith's property. Mr. Smita has afread to proreed witri the title search t.Rten as advise him that we are ready to go Woad. Mr. Ke. w.d his group are working on a treat arrangenont to handle tin aunership and receipt of payments from the City on the proposed Maggie Brown property lease-pu rcliese. R®epeetfally Your@, Warren G. Edvarde Council -roan Richard D. Ail.ler Executive Seem' a y Councilman Warren 0. Edwards San Luis Obispo, California Bear Buds In accordance with yet tequeat, I have analysed the proposed parking lo(L° near Broad and marsh and reached the following oonolusions+ (1) The layrout as proposed by the Parking neter company engineers and used by 11r. 11malin in his cost eatinates is an efficient one as far as the number Of car spsces is concerned. However, this plan was made up in Canton, Ohio without am knowledge of our local traffic conditions, and it would sees that traffic flow would be Droved if care were to enter the lot from marsh St. and leave by one of two sxits on Broad, 'so car s;roas would be lost, and another advantage would be an open space to the rear of the high" Liquor Store building which might allow loading and unloading of trucks in the morning hours, (2) There doesn't seem to be any :dvsntage to deeLwing :core than about ten feet of the SrAth property. "awever, this ten feet would add three oar spaces and provide a better overall plan. (3) If the existing 8110y to the tear of the store buildings On :'ig,lera could be incorporated as a part of the parking lot, the plan would be avan better, and somewhere between 6 and to oar spaces would be added, depending on the ;articular type of lwywut used. 'lore are the various alternates, goal Parting i,eter Co. lay -out, 90e Parking, entrance on Broad................5h spaces niteiTlatea based on iiareh entrance and 3road St. exit» :add tan feet of Smith property. ng tpmwgT—W' . ................. spume 45b ?irking behind stores on T!iguera and alongside Peterson's Auto Parts ....... 44 dreads Add existi a11e behind stores on ,1 Para °».r•'ng, same co ore as ace we ......... 66 spaces L50 °working behind steed on itiguara, alor:nsida l'etersen' - Auto Pants, and alongside FEaggie Brown store bq*ing,..... 53 sA Letter to Warren J. rAwards -2- hay 2, 1955 The final decision an to which lay -out ahoiil.d be used would lx, up to you and the council. but it is HV impression that in a fast-moving downtown lot, it is more important to have an unaongested open parking plan than to try and cram the last car " In other sords, turn -over in more 1 than the meat number of car spaces, p on your other question, mr. Unney advisee that the fire departGeent is reluctant to allow Sears Aarket to out through their fire wall, however, in the proposed plan, tracks could be loaded and unloaded from the tie jai, Brava portion of the parking lot near the rear of the Righes liquor Store 1Aiilding warehouse. For that reason, I have sketched in a four -foot n, deatrian . walk-xa;' alongside the liquor store. :. Conclusion Before looking at this matter more carefully, it looked like the proposed lot should provide a greater number of car spaces than the Dual elan indicated. After investigation, it appears that the dimension are not quite right to secure the naximun number of spaces for the area involved. However, I do feel that tots will make an expellant lot as far as traffic flow is concerned. From the merchant's viewpoint, it should also be ide[ because under the vroposed plan, there will be two ways of walking to Dra one to Marsh, two to Garden, ad one to idgnera. :espactf'ally yours, Richard D. KJUW aKecutive Secretary City Council 1u.•,R • DRAFT • I zorable Mayor and City Coincil Sar) L.ri.s Obispo, California Oentl amwas i<t accordance with the request of YhWor Lucksioger, your citisen's off street 4srldrg conaattiee is happy to present herewith its recommendatiors in re,_ard to otertdal sites for public off siareet parking. We have been greatly aided by the "Parking :Deed Survey" prepared by iE.*. George ':�:.ssi.ein wml his dcpartmwrt of arcLi.toctural engineering at Cal Poly. TUs very co4st4nt and coaprvhensive report was presented to us during the month of July and 'sar cotsaittee has given its closest attention to tiae findings therein„ Qn ,he basis of the Poly report and. our personal observation and study we ^c vir;nd .W'� following three sites for the Council's aD.aide:aticm in the first 'Zs a of property acquisitioz. 1. All or part of the half block or so abutting Harsh Street between Morro and Chonb including the Pions.sr Market and related building area, the present Sears Roebuck lot and the Riley deparwaent store property et the corner of Harsa and Chorro. 2. mho Maggio Brawn. pro; arty behind the Sews i9arYset and abutting Broad Street including the stone buildings on Broad and possib.'!,y the 75 foot frontage on harsh which is Presently being used for off street customer parkin, lire property sham the Mission Garage and mist. structures now staaid. ..v ai.i ,I:jk a. aa;_:,�-_ation, for sane later place of acquisition the cQ=ittec would . °..�� _,.ra1 locations for jr'; tnL1,g; a c i .... .6 J 1n ;y l t e3;i Cv^ velopmants. of r3ta L-.Wkr ceded ry Tda37r, ::ear�o. _.a„...::ru; a n�.3i.i; .� gcali£catione € rocowendoli that the Council consider changing thu priority indi.catod if an,r particular Brea ugre:s to raa�'zR a ;o^thtddle donation toxard en Off street £aoility in its ViCinitr. (z) Along with the 7.ots t'asr9e7 ves it is urged that c Council cans5der rwthc,11 of developing pedcstriaz: paasa.ge-WkV t4rouG;h shutting buildings to the resin atreets nom'bv tdm paridag lots. {�) The camx¢itteO recc`=OuJ % that %O Plans M r=tiseicn and Cotmail P,,sce e. �rith the Art,.00t haste in adopting recovmdatiom for additiocal cuff ,'Greet Pee -deg faeiL'itios in its ao^jng a,-einanee, to foe provided b5r future buildsm. (4) in jinn with the P0717 raport, it is ;rceomm ndad thzt the Council gve.dually rnw7e the cetera from the city ;rar' ng lot at Ft:, and ?Morro as troy become naedad ,m dowtmfe strsats and l ots. (§) Yx.:;asalein bss suggested Q;o nc d foe e continuing ci.is'njs c=dttee of some type to keep abreaet of chsagang conditions. np, ecad.tte* pasaes t7-dz suggWton an to the Covneil 'Without rec<m.!knd&T4-,,. The cm-ci.ttoo has enjoyed its wor'w wry Much, and it appreoiatea the fine aticn e."terdod by the Council and other citizens of the oammuii.ty. ",•'e havu ;cxi,QY dered this project an important me and are honored to have: been appointee ?'1y '92c: So1:,acil so wTI'wrs of the eamstttse. iVoedless to say we gill be glee: to msc't ....... ,,,,.= Cawzcil at zry time to discuss the Cententa of this report. Respectfully euIxAttodA GPrS=%g OFF S?AM PARM5 CnTW'::'MS ba orable Hgyor and City Council San Luis Obispo, California 0entlaaen, The following is a report on the proposed parking lot near Broad and Marsh. ;£ the Council concurs in the tentative agreements reached, we can acquire and improve a sixty Car pdi'king lot fox' $58,550.00„ Hr..''.ndrs bae oleo developed a basic ].ease-imrchasea agreement which is acceptable to the property Wears involved. It provides for the follovingx (1) Down pay rots of approximately 20%; (2) Nine annual paymrmts with 3j$ interest on Uc unpaid baladeel (3) Payment of all taaas and insurance by the City, (4) Provision for Ci ;;'s Cancellation of lease payments and reversion Of property to tile criEda, l otmem at the end of an,, year; (5) City to reeeivo a dccli,nire; option to purchase at the and of each year, our to receive a dead after the last payment if the nine Year payment parted is desired. Ca a lease baeis, the total initial cash outlay would be less than $15,000.00. and annual, paymnets thereafter would average less than $6,c00.00. if the buildings were left intact' parking spaces on the lot would be cut to forty aigpt. but the estimated rental income from the buildings would be $2,400.00, We have arrived at the following individual agreements, (1) Purchase or ieaoe-purchase of Dr. Loveall's 50 foot lot on Harsh at $240.00 per front foot cr t12,000.00. (2) Purchase or leaarnlrchaee of Iva Samm's 25 foot lot on marteh at the same front foot i1gura or a total of $6,000.00, t3) d sixty day option for purchase of the Maggie Brawn property at $35,000.oc (we have about forty more days ,vurimg on this option). Mr. Kamm has agreed to work with several other property owners and buainasmeem in the area to raise the $35,000.00, purchase We Property " sell -leave it basic to the City on the same terms as the other parcels, This is subject to Mr, Yanm'$ working out a satisfactory method of joint title by the various ' parties involved, is addition, all of the lays agreements are subject 11a a favorable legal opinion by tin League of California Cities, We have net yet been able to contact E, Taylor Smith since be has beam out of town, but we have an appraisal by Maurice Fitagerald on the rear tan feet of Smith"+ property at $750.00. another possibility is the obtaining of can ease- ment for a pedestrian walkway through Smith's 6 foot alley in return for an easement from the parking let to the remaining portion of Sndth's property to allow automobile access, Such easements could be wordedso that they remained in effect onlyeo IOZa as the City maintained the l^ro arty as a public parking lot. Mr. Uamlin has estimated that the cost of surfacing the let at $4.800.00. One 0.ternstive would be to take an additional 12 feet of SauWs property for $650.00 or a total of 22 feet at $3,600.0o, By utilising this atuiioraz property and by add firms nest parking spaces fran 6$0 to 9Oo, Mr. Ilaml.in feels we could spaces with the butidia®s left standing, or ei;rt spaces if the h:ildingt were takan out, Another altarnatba would be to purchase 6j foot frontage on Higuera frcaa Frecl Johnson. This vmld be,aed as a pedestrian walkway and Would leave !d;n an even 25 Soot lot. The cost mold be $4,04o OG. Conclusion, ATiar car-`ul study of ar, factcrs involved, I belie" that the proposals outlined above represent a good 'aesiness transaction for the Catty. It if alsosot � +im that after the down payment is :-da, the amuel lease paymec out of Ung coiu=.ic^r7.ng tt:e i.al�r. o'.' ther nmo art• oven if thm properties were not ultimately acquired by tm, Gity., Sincerely yours, Narrei G. 5dwards CanzcilmYe Febrw,ry 2, 1955 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmen City of San Luis Obispo, California Centlement Pumuantto the request of the Mayor, I have made an inspection of the property owned by Mrs. Ca*mbrose Ojurovich, more specifically describ- ed as "arts of Lots 3 & 5 and all of Lot 4 of thick 86, Hurray and Church Addition, camp-iaing ems 106 feet on Broad Street. The brick building located on this oroperty and housing two stores appears to be in a fair state of rewire. The building was built in four different stages. The two moron narts of the building appesr to haws been built about twanty-flve years nge. The brick and mortar are of a very good quality and ohm no deterioration. There are only two bad cracks in the walla and these are :here them were additional roose added. These two cracks I do not consider as being serious. There being so few cracks and the walls being plumb and straight would indicate that there is a very good foundation supporting this budlding. There are indications that the roof had leaked in several spots in the paint store, but hirs. Seabsek tells me that that was a year ago. Raring the last ear the owner had the mof repaired and retarred and so far this winter theta have been no rain leaks. The interior finiahs of the atoms are in vary poor condition. The ceilings am wood lath and plastic and are badly cracked. Put as far an I could learn the plaster is still tight to the lath and *hem weer to be no immediate danger of its loosening and falling. The plaster on the interior wall has been papered over, then painted over the paper, until it would be hard to "certain the true conditions however, indications are that it seems to be in good condition. The wiring is very substandard, and in keeping with the policy of this office it will be nsoessary that the store that is now vacant be rewired and brought up to present day standards of safety in accordance with our code before it can be occupied again. That portion of the building now occupied by the San Luis Mall Paper and Paint btore should be rewired also as it is now wired in open wiring in part and has been added to with none -metallic sheathed cable. Furthermore, the electrical panel in the paint store is inadequate. In the light of the nature of the present occupancy, I would strongly urge in the interest of health and safety that this building be rewired in condidt. the plumbing is old but seems to be in good working order. The floors in the original parts of the buildings are of wood, Wnile the additions have concrete floors. The Wooden floors appear to be in good shape with no signs of dry rots fungi or termites --nor do they show excessive Wear. I do not see Why this building should not be good for at leant fifteen or twenty years of use With normal care and maintenance. SGK/lb :tespeotfully yours, SETH G. KINAY Building Impactor -2- S;,N LUIS OBIspo'S FSpMIZiCE IN PECnMNO OFF -MEET PARKING ON A PAY AS YOU 00 BASIS. The Cf.ty of San iuis obispo (population 17,229) opened a new 53 car, mctersd parKing lot last December. The proporty was vmmu zed ,and improved with parking meter funds and is the fourth lot to be purehae-d on a pay as you go bases. The City now has two metered lots in operation, totalling 176 spaces by and two non-nctered lots with 82 spaces. A fifth lot has just been acquired, ;4'.. and negotiations have started on a sixth facility. 2 Cost of New Lot. Cne of t;ne parcels acquired in connection with the new rwridng lot contains a business building vith two stores. The City will act as landlord and leaso those twc stores for at least too years, and when the buildings are torn down, an addi.tionrl 22 park-ing apacas will be made available. Thorn were five property owners to deal with, but all parLios sold on a voluntary basis at ^rant fact costs ranging from $240 to $622.50. The total cost fur 21,000 aquar) feet was $58,a3.00 or 52.75 a foot. Stated in another way, acquisition coats a-rermga3 $782 per oar space and 71ws, at pia., the City +as able to keep within its present goal of $2,000 per soave, The lot Iooatlon was high on a priority list developed by a citiseno` off-street parking coramittes and was also rsco-:manded by students from the architectural engineering department at California State Polytedmio Colinge. Obstacles Encountered. One unique feature of the parking lot development was the oxistence of a giant 84 foot butkva bunya or monkey puzzle tree which was 86 yo�+rs old.. There was-�nsidnrable local sentiment for leaving the tree intact since it had formed a nostalgic part of the downtown skyline for many, many yore. Rov- sver, a tkse man citizens' eorraittes of horticultural experts appointed by the City CouncV. found that the tree would require extensive undergramzd droinags and bracing to assure its safety. Thee was also the manner of tree bearing r s^ cones which were rot visible ?4 W- the rmzlds but ':nich waighed as mach ue 14 pcunda 7 aimcss +;:.d which 'ud a tcr.6DT oy to &0 wi h nt notias. "r. tree s eventually removed and deaptta otr4r hindrances, the Pa*Lag lot was otvsncd to the peblie 105 days after property asquisi.tion. Two hour meters ors installed vith rates set at 5¢ en Front. Thees uett^a lave averase'1 $14.4 a month per matey over the firGt: five months of operatimt.. Off .Str:.et :gisim pre ram o Cnti 1 AIA. .$e City Fps Suet entered into a coat::tot of purchaso (tray 10, 19,56) ark+ taken posseasicn of the fifth parcel menticred abave which viill accommolatt 5C vehici'a. 116 pjercrcaa price will be paid off du�^ing ?brae cnledar yaara which -11.1 help to pr6serm -L:ro city's oapitel and uil]. Lle tic present emsr from a tart atandpoiut. Interest on the unpaid balance ems !�rn s-e- at 6 pere"I"t. Another method of strotoldng the City's available dollars has bean devised and n : arran^anent jjuet ec,r:I,leZed whereby s groan of businessman will make An interast-frea lo-,a of 316.ODo.00 to the City. This V.M ba applied agadnat 'tile purchsse of still another lotp •dth rspaymsat o:or a period of years t m meVr eurntng;•s on that oarticn=ar lot. In deve;.mring its off-street: pAx",dag progra•av i7�e City has been caaeful not to Swept Tatright donatZonr which right in'carfers with the possibility of full partieipaticn in subeelurart downtown perking doveloi+.>nts unda^. the 1551 "•at or e,^.lei-al aseosaTent procol e. In order to ass ra a sound program, an expert traffic engine3r and a firm of Yinanoial conrsltants have bean retairzd to dray up a master plan and a Bet of finnnaing racez--aviation. In the ,an,t; ma, ha;:ever, the City did not va:CB tc peso up asp :a-tuns.4::'s L� the form of open land available in the heart of the dcwnto'.m ama at reasonable pricas and vlt'tls the C'.ty'e ability to par. 0 LOAN TO CUT Or Un ills 011SPO Fin Orr -am" NAarin Meat Reesrr ward t. Go. tllor's Ysartmsut 3ters Sill$ 3totteserr teak of &merioa "vesrltr First latleaal Usk rsflshas reraisere Stere Severity Title Issareoes Co. title Iasvrosee A Treat Co. ia•k Fisher t'aioe Rardivere Chr/otlao'o Dress Shop Lssero Smith Drees Thep ritegorold Resets Telerrao-Tr'hase Cs. nalas desetn$t/ss Co. i5,n0b.00 1"'00.00 1, 000. 00 1,000.00 1,^06.00 I,000.00 754.110 750.-n 500.eo 500.00 500.00 300.00 'Wo.b0 500.00 $16,000.00 .,cnorable atggor and City Council 3::n Luis Obispo, California Genvlor.:an: The follow. ,,;',.s a brief report on the off. troet parking quasticanaire diotributed bg the Chamber of Corsx,rcr, in ctober. ,iitrty four questioirtaires wero canaleted out of the 750 distributed. Of these fiftcau :i:•dic:rted "A they were interested in the property behind Sears Market, and would coma-lbuto to the project. The ooatributiar:s offered varied fr== fifty c--rts a month for five years to fifty <'ollars a month Tor an indefinite loneth of tine depending on the lease involved. Tbi,rt0m• indicated ayes" on gpecticn in Ie*'ec road: wdovld Yen rathor Vile Council proceeded within t;le limits of its ^inaacoa to acquiro f.ccilitics, to be located :'t Sites selcated iU accordLaCe witL its bust judgpDnt". six oti':ers made miscall_awous r ugga opz. T:;ere wra no i_r. favrr a the t:erro, Chorro, F",..rsh an;' Pacific block or tka PL:ddelana eervlce statism proport,•. In fact, one businessman recommended atmngly e,ainst the ktaddalcm site. Two anesthonasires indica.tod hunt the buainesaa concerned mere already providing off- stroet parking and did not foal they should do any ,.ore. Ore btmiwss offered a contribdt on of Six Dol.l,ar's a month lxit drat not spco Lry vte-e his coutribution wild be applied. Ttar of_`orod to coRCributo if ever7one else did, but they did not Specify any a:aomrt, and two suggested making th3 Mosion Garage property into a .,_ass covered narL•. Sincerely yours, Richard D.:.'iiler E-ecutive Secretary to City Coubcil =�•tl£dt�.:.., ....._..�:w.�°ryeatw=w+;:rmu.,_.aw"'vL-.�,v.a..M,tiutm..:;....,�_w. J.,.�.c��v�:ea&.o aIPY "a ^�ieJ'"' San Luis Obispo City Chsber of Coeuaerca San Luis Obispo, California Dear Sir: As reportnd in the local press. This questionnaire on off-street parking is bJing r,:nt to each businesm = in the City, As you know, a citizensts off-street parking ecmnuittoe, apiointed by the City Council, has baon working for rmll ov-r a ycm• on the problem of enlarging our public off-stroet parking facilities. The followin,,7 final recoanondationn by this conni.ttce were as follows: 1. The entire block hounded by Morro, Chorro,-Marsh and Pacific, portions of said block to be purchased as available; 2. The Maggie Brown property behind the Sears Market and abutting Broad Stme.t including the atorc buildings on Pro%i, including the 75 foot frontzgc on Karen, and d:,o .'including the F, H. Johnson property, to bu used as a pedestrian passageway from the: parking area to Higuira Street; 3. The Maddalena servico station property; 4. Tho property whore the old Mission GrraR_e an,! related Structures Stood until their racont razing, In connoe�ion with its study program, the citizens' corm4ttee also solicited the sorvic.:s of the Dopartmont of Prchitoct'.uurl Engineering at C1 Poly. The study prcpar,d by etudents of the dcpo.rtm nt under the diraeticn of 'Mr. George HaSelLin, sugf stcd the following sites; 1, AS ¢'.uch space as possible in the block bounded by Morro, Charm, Higuora and %arch and abutting Marsh; 2, Basically the rand as No. 2 move. 3. Be-ically the samo as No. 3 above. Alone; with its final mpert, the citizens; corvnittoo made the following, room- mendat:gin: "It is recommended that the Council conzidor changing the priority indicmted if any particulr ar,a armcs to nRe a. worthwhile donation tow,sd an off-atroct parking frciiity in its vicinity", IN ACCOM;11 E WITH THE SUGG&TION, TIE COUNCIL HAS KVED TTR: CHARRM OF COMB•-,RM TO rISTRIBUT'ri THIS QUESTIONNAIk;, f`,GF-'sl �R, THE COFJN^.Il HAS ALSO ASF0:0 1Z TO 1diJ7 IT Lri:RY CIF,R THAT Tff.H'R& IS NO FR653K?L INVOLV D, TFti CITY HAS AT PP:SDIT OVF,R a80,000 AVAILABLE FROM PPtEVIOUS ACCUM.F.TIOM OF PARKING ZiFUR R3CdlFTS,. THIS NONEY C.;N BE IM0 FOR OFF-ST 4,T FjL uUNG FdCILIT". TM CITY H,,S ON ITIAND AN 11TAP.T2AL APPR'.3L.L ON SEO&R:.L POS312LF. DOWN'MIV 4 PARKING LOT LOC,TIONS AND 13 R&J)Y To FROMM. How wr, the ci.tysl money will po further if there am matching funds. More- over, somo display of monetary cooperation on the part of one or more down- towa group:: wuld acemplish the followings 1. It would h^lp tho council in determining the first lot or lots to be ecquirca!; 2. It would be an equitable way of making this determination; 3. It, would also give the council and others concerned assurance that thn area was economically a sound location; 4. It would ostablieh a pattern for the future; aid 5. ns -:mtionud above, it would rwikc the cityls money po further toward solving the total problem. LACKING 25C{1'a CMC:r TE h7C'FESSION OF OFIiTON, T'._E; COUNCIL 1,CULD T,;NT;.Tlvz;LY PLAN To '0 AHF fO Hy J,Mi.RY 1, 1955, USINJ IT5 BST JUDGi:"ZnIT ON Tfti LOC,TION OF FACILITIES. IN ANY EWNT, FROM DISCUS,IONS PiI:VIOU`iLY aLD, IT jKU'is ADVISADLI': TO METER MDOIINTOWI LOTS TO 110UR:, CUSTOIZR TURNOVLR. AT THE 34E TDX, TT 13 FL, AMZ) TO PXUZ) VIM A SMTc2JATIC PROUR,11 CP FA2i0VIN3 TIE Ya-,r fr FROM P'JHLIC F,J''MNG LOT AT PALM ;M MORRO. If you wi::h to record your f.+,1inCe on thin vitally important subject, please return th OuJstin:IDnire to the Cnmaber office by Nov;.mbcr 1. Fred H. Johnson FARM IMPLEMENTS and MACHINERY Box 391 1119 Gordon S1, Phone 164 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA October 7, 1954 9sn Tails Obispo City, Chamber of Commerce, 998 l:onterey St., San Luis Obispo, Calif. Dear Sirs:- rneloeed is a copy of a letter which I have addressed to our City Council in reply to the letter and questionnare I received a few days aGoj in regard to off-street parking space in the business part of our City. Yours very truly,,,, October 7. 1954 City Council, Prod Lnc %nE;jr. Sd3. Or. City }call. 990 Palm St., San Luis Obispo. Calif. Dear Sire;- 3etiyin3 tc the latter and questionnaire sent out by the Chamber of Cominorce rc.S rdin_3 off- Streot-arking Ifor the businOoc L--ation of air City. I au in busino::,. and a nroporty orinar in the block bounced by :'i'^uera. .: rch. woad tsad "arden ,)treats.I :m =;cue :nr, rilllu3 to 3o along :,ith any reasonable method of obt-Ining parkin;; space in this block. ,,V v%cant lot on Ut7uer ; t. hug not been e. cred for Palo :Lud 1' this lot is needed to carry out the •rojeet In this area I am willing to cell and at the eamo time make pry donc:tion as a proporty o'..nor. ?:y best wishes f_�r your success. Yours very truly. WMTIO.R76IRE ON OF:'„TRETP PAEUNG OCiOBnR, 195(4 1. Name of your business or p�ro}t:rty: y.s�./�•^-� ^"'- ��""� 2. Address: .% % P• eM.ea.�1.. -,U (� 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: - 4. Would you consider making a contribution toward a parkin, lot in Your arc,:? 5. If so, how much would you consider? • f B O � G. Would tilis be a flat sum, or so .m:ch a month for fiivo ye -.-'rr3 or other method of payment? (Fic^so spceify): A-V " ! 7. Would you rather thy; crnu:cil procood within tho linit❑ of its finnncos to ^cqui.rc f^cilitics, to h• iocat�d in rdte3 scicct�d in accordnnca vtith its b: ct •jujpn:u nt? S. Other augv;stions: 1'L6rSE R�2TURN YH15 QMMOMAILE TO THE OFFICL NOT L,ii'r;R TH,01 HOVaJiv;R lot IF Y,"] i,;, y i „ SECCND QU, 92I0MJAIRB FOR YOUR L':)j,C!C' i11V FILL 0, Pi--',E C.,LL T4:, s.......................... �.�".' S.vk—w1'S�Ti1Rf1® WMTIOMILIRE ON OF7-6M r PiSImm OCTOR6R, 1954 1. Name of your business or property: 'T"'`" 2, Address; 7/ Sr 14O A 3. Your position in fixes or status as preperty owner:„�_. 4. Would you consider making a contribution towu3 a p xkin-, lot in your area? %4 n qq�� 5. If so, how much would you consider? 01.0 t) G. Would tt:is be a flat sum, or so much a month for five years or other of payment? (!': - Yu# �r.-ne. -t�,e.... S n� : I .Qei w?.,d, � � �.- 7. Would you rather th, council proceed within the li,7ito of its fi,'Mces to accuiro fncilitics, to tx locstad in sitos scicctod in-ccordance with it, u,,,t ,iu3Eom:.nt, S. 0',i..r c. rt'-.ns: p•,.D.,, `�j t�,. emu^~ �Q a.oae-us�eQ �+e�e,.�m, TO THE ..,. OFF112 NOT 1,,a::Tf 26,.N NOVf INN lot IF YcJ W,:NT d SECCi"U .�UF:,I'lOLS'I:.IRR FOR YOUR Lu^_UL0;4D h Fla I:"" PL::.:.3Z C,.LL TH:i INTSTI019;;JDv 01.7 0011,10H21, 1954 r /d 1• Mwne of your bnsine7c or z. �¢itlls�o fTT�i"' /yt Gaiyy� 3. Your pos Lion in fim or ct.^tus es property owner: 4. would r " ' v YOU aoncid�r mokL� ii contribution t�warl c F",rica , lot in yq your arho f�� �L7i L'e.> ��S 5• If so, how much we�il,d you consider G. Would t!:is to a flat sum, or so Imtch a month for fiv.: po ' r5 nr otho ��J/` method of payment? t,�. .,cife-)O�'Q=?J L}J�lZJy� Z?��2"' 7. Would you rather th! COunail pro- w:i.thin the Jin}ts of i+,., f}nnces to �cquirn f%Alitics, t low:'. !n ;dtos c-,l. in eeordmto with it, bo;;t b 8. Other euv,u,:eticns: _q � w ` V � QUESTIONNAIRE ON OFF-CTRMT PARKING OCTOBER, 1954 1, Name of your business or property: San Luis Clinic 2. Address: 990 Pacific, San Luis Obi.`po, Calif. 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: OniP.rs 4. Would you consider making S contribution toward a parking lot in your area? No 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6. Would this be a flat suns. or so ;Rich a month for five years or other method of payment? (Floase specify): 7. Would you rather th-a co"uwil proceed within the limits of its finances to acquire facilities, to be located in :rites selcetod in accordance with its best ju:ig.,mcnt? Yes 8. Other supgestions$ Inasmuch as we provide our own off street narking,, we do not feel. in a position to provide such for other property owners. '{owever, we do feel it is a vitalneed in the community. PLHISE h:itiRN 11,115 QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE M;d- ER OFFICE NOT LATER TH,,N NOYEMH'e.R 1st IF YOU VWNT A SECOND QUESTIONNAIRE SCR YOUR Lt,R'bLC,Z TO FILL IN, PLE.'.3E C..LL T!; C{„hIIii.R OFFICE. a smis�_�; OCTOBER, 1954 1. Nime of your business or property: Sears, Roebuck and Co. 2. Addrors: 879 Riguera St. 3. Your position in firm or status or property owner: 'Manager 4. Would you concider making a contribution towazd a parking lot in Your ar,=a? 5. If so, how much would You consider? 6. Would this be a flat am, or so much a month for five yearn or other method of payment? (Flcsso specify): 7. W01.11d You rather the eounoil proeoed within the limits of its finances to rLC rui.r': fnci.litics, to h,. locatc:i in :Stus scloctod in eccord•mco with its bent judgomrnt? We furnish in our parkinC lot parking for anproffimately 72 cars. Inasmuch as this parking is not controlle4 this benefits the tovn generally. ME;ZE R01-11'FN TF'].S Q1ff,TIOPII11,IRE TO THE Cl;..Ji:i!:8 0F:'1Sd NO!' L. ^':a4 '"MA NoTa'La lot IF YDU V,I,Iri .: Sc.CO Z) Ql:+ «3T10+ dIRH: FOR YOUR Z5;STI0i'lf.IR ON OF-7-fiTRIET PFJjKING occroa:R, 1954 1.. Nsmo of your burin, rs or rrop,rty: TOWER BUILDING 2. Gddrons: IM 842 Higuera Street 3. Your position in firm or otntus as property owner: owner 4. Would you consider making a contribution toward a puking lot in your ar,::r.? Yes 5. If so, how much would you consider? see Ummocca:kMolooks: beloVe 6. Would t!As be a flat sum, or so :mioh a month for five yours or other methaV, of payment? specify): Could be either 7. Would you rather the council prce..,.d within, the linits of it-, finances to ocquir .:ilitzos, to be located in rdtas sel.wtod in accord mc, , ° in cooperation of owners tax payers association would be prefered;but a must in my view. g, rrI,, r r-. •.r st Would suggest some plan as per tax payers Association and on a property valuations basis or as equitable as possible;or in assessment district to force all beneficiaries in and on a bond plan if feasable. I have advocated this for same time w,.d suggest Alhambra be studied if any doubt lingers;as they have taken a lot of business from Pasadena I am told;because of close in parking. IT WILL AS USUAL BE HARD TO GET FIRM OFFERS TO DO;;ATE OR SELL and Condemnation might be best -do not know how Alhambra handled it$but it is close in and a rriend of mine who uses the same is very favorably impressed as a constumer to get close in reasonable fee parking, and goes there more - _ on that acet. I would be apt to do as Ted Maino Sr. did. Oct 4th 54. Harry W.Palnter,Apt it-K 435 Corson Ave., "os-ngeles 36. WfSTI0:ilil,IRE ON OCTOB22, 1954 1. Name of your bnsin+,7s or prolx,rty: COAST LAND RE,LT° CO. 2. Pldress: 1214 Broad St., San Luis Obleno 3. Your position firm or ctctus as property onner: Realtor(rented rrouertv.) 4. WRCd you concidjr making a contribution tow:ud a p, Amin,; lot in you;' iron? so. 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6. Would this be a flat sum, or so much a month for five years or other mcthcri of payment? (Eloise specify); 7. Would you rather the council proceed within thu li-it of it, fietancos to ncquiro fscilitic�s, to bE located in sites salocted in accord. nee with its bcot judgement? 8. Oth.r t`.ons: NOTE: We do not eroect to remain at this address, and would not wish to contribute in this area. However, when are established in another location we will ,give further consideration to the matter. rL.'„r, i 'P1; TO THE Pt'-1 IuT.e"y;fi 1st F04 YOUR QUMTIO 11111R,C CN OF--STP17W PAIMUG OCM;rp 1954 1.. N,vse of your busincca or property: <, 63L uss: 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: 4. Plould you concider naking a contrib,ition towiri a pocking lot in your arch? 5. If soy how much would you consider? 6. Would this be a flat sum, or so such a month for five years or other method of paymetrt,? (::"la�eo nnreify); . uld you rather th,:; council proceed witYdn the Brit; of it:- finsncca to ncqulry fncilitica, to W: lccctcd in ;dtea aalactod in accOrd'mco with its bort judgamcnt? 8. Other su g;;stions: tL. WE f y '75 QULSTIONN;dRC TO THE C') I OT I—'. 'n `I let IF 1J It FCh'ICUR QI;L.TI07MAIR:E CPJ CF'-vTRC7, oc"oa;R, 1954 1. ECvne of your business or prop,rtyp (' .w, x 2, 6ddress: 3. Your poeitien is firm or status as property owner: e-*-� m, 4. Would you consider making a contribution tow:ud s prancing let in yoc ar..n? 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6. Would tUs be a flat w ra, or so ouch a month for .five years or other Mcthod of payment? (Flcr.se snacify): 7. Wm:ld ycu rather tho council prcceed within tha knits of its fivancr;s to aogniro fr:eilities, to b,, located in ;dtus saloctcd in rcooxd•mcc with it❑ tn: -t ,juJownt? L{I.,4/. 8. Oth,;r su,gn•=st`ona: o F.J;.,.'-N .'.S G,'L':'IO^,^.f;,IRF. TO THE C Ci , :TOT 1 , 1 L, Si! t � ' -;_di 1st F'o;l YOUR TP -'LL LY, Pi.t:...3a C.,II, '1'v:S QMMIO(NNAItZE ON OF7-6TPJ:Z PARKING ocroBER, 1954 i.. Nnme of your obusinc,rs or prop rty: 2. Address: 6 R -7 W-o- -'� 7 "Vp 3. Your position jr, firm or status vs prop( rty owner: 4. Would you conaidor making a contribution toward a parkin- lot in Your aran? 5. If so, how much would you consider? b. Would t::is be a flat nu , or so omch a month for five years or other methvi of pay=nt? (Fic ^,so spocify): 9. Wo;ild you rather th:, council proceed within the limits of its fi+,ances to acquirc fzcnitics, to b, Located ill sitea scl ctcd in accord mcc with its beet Julg�+ar nt? 8. Oth.:r bl-'� . 640 � OMMOPIITAIRER � C;;;,tiC7i?k OFFICE NOT L:::LR MN NOVaGka lot IF YOU W NT A aECON➢ QUESTIONN:.IRF F'OR YOUR L.IULO,i.0 'i'l? FILL IN, PL-;..iZ, C..LL Tf!:i 4.. WMTI INAIRE ON OF?„TME6, PhI'Y,INi. OOiO11-R, 1954 1. Name of your businecsor rey: 2. Address: $.S3 0 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: v 4. Would you consider ranking a contribution towcud a parking lot in your aroa7 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6. Woad this be a flat am, or so much a munth for five years or other mctho9 of payment? (Plcrisc aoecify)e 7. Would you rather th,• council proceed within the 1i,^its of its finmec;s to acquiro fncilitico, to tv, located in sites seleetod in accordance with its bcA Judgrtm,.nt? 8. Other nug ost?ons: !, I LEZE RM:F:; P116 CUESTIONMI,IRE TO THE P,.;.i/,i,° 4 OPPJC;Z NOT I,:_C.R TH,,N NOVIZ1Tj;R let IF Y(<I B.CJT. ,; 5 CCiZ) rl e,'!IOMNAIM FOR YOUR 'JI,C X) PiPILL liJ, °i.L:.(iF; C-LL VU CL,__ l:i.. '. @t.•iSTJO,'.N PF, ON PilFMMI OO"'Ca R, 1954 1. Hmo of your busincsa or property: 0>Donamll Ineurenoe/er►Soe 2. Address: 103E Nipomo St. 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: Omer 4. WOWd you consider makime a contribution tcwmd a parkin; lot in yoc� arcn? No 5. If so, how cnuh w0111d you consider? 6. Wo,itd this be a flat am, or so much a month for five years or other method of payment? (Ficso specify): 7. Worn:ld you rather th.= counril proceed wi--thin the lisits of its fi=mcas to aequi.re f::cilitics, to N, .located in Ate3 solected in accordance with its bc;t ,judgem-.nt? Yee B. Other sug•ast."_ons: FI„ZE RFMN T1I3., C'M'MONIIAIRE TO THE GAI'NhR OFI:Ir.s '70T L;'I';F. TH,A 110731PER let IF YPU WART A SHCOZ t "aMOP I-AIRN' FhR YOgR L;B:ULOitD 'A'' ! TILI„ LJ, FhL;,;'>;: G-LL TFI:: WMTIQ U'SFE ON OF?I:TRZ-7, PArKRTG Or,O M' , 1954 1, .Name of your business or property; '(/Ol 2. Address; — SS j71'e, wz ti ���7 (% 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: gDRf)NefN ///7flN9ck-j, 4. Would you consider making a contribution towazd a parkinp, lot in you, ar,:a? , NO 5e If so, how much would you consider? 6. Would t'.,is be a flat sum, or so much a month for five years or other meth"' of payrwnt? (FL:r,se specify); v. would you rather the council proceed within the limits of its finances to acquire facilities, to t,, loe"tad in :rites suloetcd in accordance with its best judrow nt? FS S, Othr;r suggestions: </ FLE;SB P, '21Jnd 'PfiIS QUESTIMAIRE TO THE C:L;tIS;R OFFICE, NOT 1,6715R Mwj NOMMEH let IF Yi'U Vi:StT e s:iCOh1t .' ::ST10!,.rw IRS nu YOUR LdiULG;[1 i"0 P1T.L W, PLE:3B C-LL Tti3 QUESTIONNAIRE ON OFF-STREET PARKING OCTOBER, 1954 1. Name of your business or property: 2. Address: 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: vt 4. Would you consider making a contribution toward a pinking lot 1n your area? -0 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6. Would this be a flat sum, or so much a month for five years or other method of payment? (Please specify): 7. Would you rather th:, council proceed within the limits of its finances to acquire facilities, to be located in :rites selected in accordance with its best judgement? ,e Be Other suprestions: r ii PLEASE RETURN 'THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CHA14BER OFFICE NOT LATER M M NOVEMBER lot IF YOU WANT A SECOND QUESTIONNAIRE FOR YOUR LANDLORD TO FILL IN, PLEFLE CALL THE CH„MBER OFFICE. 8 QUi'STT0NNLIItG ON DF.-LTItliL?' PARKING ocxBa" 1954 1. Nam of -our businosa f�or Frop.:rt : f. JI'etpl C 5we'/:W"' 2. Address: 63a'P/ls�i+a-rt A`� tor.I�l.�v�w7l�tt- 3. Your I-o ,ition ii Um or status as prop, rty minor: 1r1 �✓� 4. Wo»1:3 you considar :linking n contribution toward c p::rt<in^ let in your era'.? C . '� 14,A-� ��/ -*` 12 G.i �r-Y}� Y' 5. If sor '.tow z,mch would ycn con�ilcrrs .__ 6. Wonl.d t:.ia no a fiat sun„ or so :much n 1 ath for y,c%rs rr cth,.r niuthV of peryrr nt? (Flc++sa s, ociiy): 7. Wv"ld ymz rather tha council proc e:d within the 11;:it:; of ito fvt¢nc�a to acquire feci.lities, to '.z loc rateti ir, -it.:s soloetad in accordance with icsmob. �a judgam, lit? 8. Other rmn -,st ons: •+" "�'�� �'" -N.¢n—f. p y. 7-io i`o .�*,* #tc...s-��iif+e�..a(, �h s �71 r/'n0 'iNSS Q!WTI0MiJ iE TO THE OPFL;E NOT LX:iJR TH..N NOV1jjR,;R lnt I:' YJII };::Tt A SECOND QU'%':IONI::1Ifi� FOR YOUR T.' CILL IDi, PL -3v; C.-L Tlw QUESTIONNAIRE ON OFF-STREET PARKING OCTOBER, 1954 I. Name of your business or property; (�i CEFic E 2. Address: 14()d w� 3. Your position in fits or status as property owner: 4. Would you consider making a contribution toward a parking lot in your area? 1,,c 4 Lo c r s Se (I 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6* Would this be a flat sum, or so rush a month for five years or other method of payment? (Ploase specifv): 7. Would you rather the council proceed within the 1Laits of its finances to acquire facilities, to be located in dtos selected in accordance with its best judgement? .A:s i S. Other suggestions; 7c hrAke tired ),4,c)krstieic 93"j?e 16;ic a LASS ce,) e,(' drk ff / f/ / ( -I U4{tldl, �Li ,� Stir lfiG/P 40" �tCu.. A 1" Ctct �iJ/cAAc ntlsf,e... —A-CT H i'A,eKAu'E Lc9". C l` Ij"ED,vGcz PLEASE RE"URN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CHAMBER OFFICE NOT LATER TH,N NOVEMBER let IF YOU WAIST A SECOND QUESTIONNAIRE FOR YOUR LANDLORD TO FILL IN, PLEASE CALL THE CHnMHER OFFICE. QUESTIONNAIRE ON Ur STREET PARKING OCTOBER, 1954 1, Name of your business or property; 2. Address; a4VWV 3. Your position in firm or status as propertyon,mor: .0" 4. Would you consider making a contribution toward a parking lot in Your area? A' 1 �.-✓�CivN¢O ,k /j,(Q�.t,L[-- �1 5. If so, how much would You consider? v 6. Would this be a flat sum, or so much a month for five years or other Method of payment? (PIC-ISO specify); /?. W ild you rather the: council proceed within the limits of its finances to acquire facilities, to be located in :dtus selected in accordance with its best judgamcnt? 4. Other suggestions: PLEASE RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CFi;MMFt OFFICE NOT LATER THAN NOVEMBER let IF YOU WANT A SECOND QUFSTIONNAIRE FOR YOUR LANDLORD TO FA,L IN, PIX,--E C„LL THE CH,XBEI OFFICE. MZT101NIT.UhL OH 0F,4,TY1;.;P P,11XINIG OTMEal, 1954 1. Nllm of your bitsinso or Frup.,rt54 ��( 2. hddrers: 3. Your po<.tion _n Arw or stetus r.. propz rty mmer: 4. WT,1d you conAdor molting a. cirtribution towLad a pa&in,,, JoL in' your 'ar", ? 5- If 00, hOw -ucl- mull yull cnn:i,LrT 6. Woit]Ll tias he a flat sues, or F, nich Wh for fi,;� y_%i's or oth,r mAhv Of Pftymullt? (!I specify): 7# Wolild you rpthEr th, comicil w-',t}jj, the 1L,it,; of i, fifimc-,s to accidi, f-�cjjjtia- to loc-,t, il,tos zjl-ctod 0 Ll 4:i in accordance vdtt, it. be of juit„i;m• nt? Oth,r C, r� 7to QijFsi1ONN,dU 20 THE HG FCH YUM CC L Son Luis Obispo City Chamber of Commnerco San Inds Obispo, California Doer Sir: As reportad in the l.ocn,l pros. This qucstionnri.•c :m off-street parking is being r,�nr, to each busincsmnaa in tho City. Au you knew, a citizensrs nff-street parkin,; oauAttue, apointcd by the City C.nncil, has been workin;:f or well ovor a yc;x on the problem of enlarging our public off-stroct parking facilities. The following final rucona•:ondatiars by this cormdttc:: wore as follmm: Q-1.. Thu entire, block boundad by Fierro, Chorro, Marsh and Pacific, portions of s.id bloc's to tau pur ch - s..d 2, The t: ;ii; Proem pr purty bah nd th- 5a rs :crkot and %butting Broad Strr t inclieinr, th -tore huildmr.- on Lrn a, including t 75 foot frxit v .n h.rsh, _nd :1 o :ncludin th.: F. H. Johneon roperty, to b e used . pod. ztri.:n pas sgcw.y from the par ileg . r ..1 t o 4i:;uirn. Strout; r_l*�A-J3. TI Rr idd .l n r:crvic station nropurty; r:rr,-.o rtv ncr.: th. old His ion i.:•.ra c .n 1 rag t dtructuros stood until ',h-it r CL.it ra Ln , In cu:m.0 ion with its tudyy Ire r:m, Lh i*izcns1 eer:.dtt, a,;c solicited the sorvio:s of the 17„partY:,; it of Archit.,ctar:1 rin,;ineorin7 at C,1 Poly. The study prep r,d ky Aul,nto the ar:nrenunt under the dirccti:m ."'r. ;. r^,o HnssL:in, etrggnst.td the f oL nwizg sitos; 1. Ac much sp cc;.. etu posniblz in the block boundud by Ml rro, Chorro, Aiguora mid ;lersn end %Luttia„ harsh; 2, %!o. 2 at, vo. 3. 5^sion11y t or'a, ^:; N . 3 above. Along witty its fis.1 r��rt, t itis.- r s:k-u.itt .ntvlC t. • f„lio.ain„ rccam- mendiatSan: "It is mvmeocmn od the th:: CrunCil a.nsi:Lr ti„ priority indiontul if any particular ,x':.a rr-Ls t , .t.k.: c w�rthuhil.. i,niticn iir:rd an off-s,roet parkdng f::cility in it:, vicinity". n F-, LA QUESTIONNAIRE ON OF?—:TRM-T P!jMNC. OCIOALR, 1954 } 1. Name of your business or property J'( 4. ` /A L,&_10�' u cQw 2. Address: y V/ 8 (�l ! y Gt-L-eA 3. Your position in firm or status as property ownor:� Ljcv. • 4. Would you consider making a contribution towazd a pta*ing lot in your ar,n? U &'Co y".,n..a 5. If so, how much /would you consider? 6. Would t'us be a flat sum, or so much a mnnth for .five years or other method of payment? (Plc.^.sc specify): i, W01:ld ynu rather thy: council pros K:r: within the Urits of its finwcas to acquire fncilities, to 2�,' located in Ates selccctod in accordrmco with its b.::,t judfc:ia n' y}n "- __fie /�� a. Oth,:r ruE,•::st�.ons: hu 1LL+�(s.s �`o'C +� "'�4 `" a oc( jG /a C'GK,au Ca! G.l-a�,Pr,�G�o G-E'� + f — FL:;ISE PuilRN 'f!'15 QLWTION'.JAIRE TO THE C:, 7d:Eiic OF;1r,L Z40T Ld"'i,R TH,A NOMi:dd.R let IF YOU ti;daT A SECOS+D O,U,s5'f10?.ri I:,IRt?. FOR YOUR L,. ,DL000'1 Tip "ILL IN, F'Il: ai . C..LL T!i:,' l . ''Ii1.,. GN:e5TI0:Idi1SFF. OCf OF?„TP=,'e i'f�P1�IC - XPOR41', 1954 1, Name of your bnsin(,;s or pro g.rty: l7�• � ' ""�'-� 3. Your position Ln fizm or status as property other: 4. Would you consid-,r making a contribution towcud a yx. cin, lot in your ar.^? V%to 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6• Would tSds be a flat sum, or to much a nonth for five years or other mcthwi of payment? (F1t: n.se opocify):------- 7. Would you rath::r the comtcil proceed within the limits of its fiascos to ncquiro frcilitiez, to 1, loc a`turt Lt rdtos salactad in '1ccord%ncc with its bent jwigom, nt? �Jl 8. Oth,.r snr.cst-7.ons: 4UEJTIORY1fSPS: TO THL lot 1,. PInze of your bnsiaore or prop,rty: /4ptyyF 2 j3UT4.&R 2, Address: It as CtlO&" 3. Your position in firm or stztus or, prop rty cmmer: 0 W air 4. WmEd you conid:zr raking a contrib:ition tcwud a perkin, lot in Your or.:n? NO $. If so, how much wolald you consider? E. Would t!ds be a flat sem, or no ;.each a mcmth for five years or other mcthvi of payment? (pL=oae sp::ei.fv)r i. Wm1d you rather t!m coluicil proc ed with n th. Ii it^ of it,s firrnc:,s to ac,uir,: f,.cilities, to b: Ioc.tad in :ituo :oIoCted in accodmca with it:s bc;;t juif�om:.nt? f(-95 S, otht:r su.;�r.sticns: t L,L::i$ iLi P!.`iP: P:'t; rcIJG'TIOPL';i.Sf'ui To THE ff ➢C7',faith lot Yr:; Y00R 9II15TI0:RIkIRE ON OF:'-STP=—T PFd mm oClGB,2,, 1954 1. Nome of your busincra or prcp„rty: UNION HARmARE CoWAn 2, Address: 725 Higuera Street, San +.d.is Obispo, California 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: owner of business. 4. Would you con:;idor making a contribution toward a pnrkine, let in your arcr.? YES 5. I£ so, how much vonld you consider? 15.00 per month for 5 yeare on the basis that #S recommendation is followed. G• Weuld Vis be a flat am, or so :ouch a reonth for fivo years or other method of payment? (Flcnse spocifv): 7. Wei,ld you rather th,: council proceed within the liritn of itc fin nccs to acrdro frcilities, to b; located in :dtoa aoleeted in nxcord-mce with its bent judmz,m-::`? No. 8• Oth,r su rq<:ations; I suggest you proceed first on proposition #2 of the final recommendations of the committee. UNION HdRMRE C0 TI.JIY �A ROLRT H. pfl^_'FRS F711 QUG�TIONPdIRE TO THE ...r', CL1'T� L P;OI 1 ?:;ft V f NV J"`dsi;R lot IF f(`•;� 'v:.,',T :;:CINT : iC`:::;.IRF; FY;: Y01ig UNION HARDWARE COMPANY � 725 HIOUERA STREET TELEPHONE 43 UCI Ib$4 N SAN LUIS OBISPO. CALIFORNIA RECEIVED ogt Ober B, 1964 C"y e C�X1 Mayor Fred Luckeinger & City founcll City Hall San Luis Obispo, California Gentlemen, In response to the questionaire from the Chamber of Coerce on off street parking I have this date indicated that I would be willing to contribute toward the cost of establishing an off the street parking lot on the Maggio Brown property behind the Sears Markel; and abutting Broad Street including the store buildings on Broad, including the 75 foot frontage on %Iarsh, and also including the F. H. Johnson property, to be used as a pedestrain passageway from the parking area to Higuera Street. I wish to take this occasion to urge your favorable consideration on the plan for establishing an off the sires. parking lot on the above mentioned property for the following reasons, 1. That at the present there are no adequate off the street parking facilities available to the customers of the stores and businesses located in our end of town. 2. That the stores and business in this end of town including my orm business have experienced a substantial lose of patronage that can be directly attributed to the inability of our customers to find adequate parking space near our places of business. S. That failure to provide adequate off the street narking facilities in our area will result in an increas- ing drift of busineas ?rom the stores in the area with a consequent movement of business firma to the other area Pryor Fred Luo n&or k City Council �otober 8, 1964 Page -l- and the unreasonable depreciation of property values in this section of town. 4. That the property recommended can be obtained with lose difficulty, more rapidly and with leas expense than any other property enumerated in the report of the Chamer of Commerce. Further it is believed that more care could be accomodated in this lot for less cost per can stall than in any other area under consideration. Respectfully, /UUNIIOON� HP-RD`Y4RE CCO➢I�PhRY Robert N. Peters RFP{lf _..,. ... L� - s. ua. ,� ..w. .. -�„rr Oczoa.-e, 1954 1. N,w of your busincca or proporty.- THE ypca,,,vgx_' S',caa 2. Addross: 719 H:f:re.a St. San Luis Obispo, Calif 3. Yaw position 4-1 fim or status as property owner: 00"r 4. Would you conaidur mnkinE a contribution tow:ud a p:mki" lot in your arcn7 Yea 5. If so, how rauch would you convidcr? i5.00 per aonth G. Would Vds be a flat swa, or no rmoh a monthfor five yearn ar other method of pn7,�JntR (F1.:^so oroei;y): per month 7. Wo"Id you ratbcr th• cowi^il prococd within the lirito- of its fLrvic:.c to accl.;ir,r fncilitio,, to b,; locrtad in Ates oolcctod in record:mce with it,, b:a:t •judF,e,, nt? No S. Othr.r e,rr•,:.at.'.onn: Noae 1 Lii;5E 1!IS . ti ,'.iS ('lTaiIOP,".{��Iiu•; TO THE T ,; I Cr l 'Pf' ! t u J ^aiWai let i Yi•1 F. , 3r,O00- l;1I0'. .SH9� 17,64 YO151 QlirSTl0?N,IbF ON OF:'-+;TRiL' OGMBr R, 1954 1, Nam of your business or prop,-rty: SEARS MARKET 114 MARSH S-- ^ SET 2, i,3dross: Sntl Us OBISPO, 44 3. Your rositiOn in fine or ctatus as property comer: 4;t-tm , 4. Would You considor making a contribution toward a parkin; lot in You; arn? yr-s. �1 5. If so, how much would you consider} APPRok. 150120 /110u7y. b. Would this be a flat sue:, or so ¢mch a month for five Yrar, or other nctho': of pcYmont? (F`L,aso spcca �: DCfEN&S ON OVIL LEASE AT STORk. 7. Would you rathor th-: council precaa:d within the li:-its of 1.. f8;rmce0 to aegaiio £ncilit t.> M locatad in si.tus solacted in accom-mce rdth its. Ot�,.r mir, PAAK QM5TlC%'!jAIRF To THE C'6dd3iia Oi c'1C� NOT L:.2i It TIT,of NOVI'-•G:( lot I: !l''J k4dvT o Si:CC7p i..t�i Cii.J.3,�.i OFe IOn. QU1STIaTJi.INL 6p OF. '"<"P.`."IT PARKING Oc, OOB nt, 1954 1. Nrunc of your bnsinGrs or prop-aty: SA}DS.`!XG K'rRX Sr;.Ft CO., boX 206, S. L. 0. 2. Address, 3. Your po,ition t :im or status ar prop<rty miner: Manager 4. WoUld you con:;id,,r:uking n contribution tow,," a p:sking� lot in yrnm nx�a? Yes 5. If so, how ;.+mh wcniL3 you con:idcr? Amount to be in proportion to ot.:rr donations 6. Woiid this 'oo a flat sum, or So ;:;uclt a L:,,nt.h for fivo or other k1dc73M slcthort of poyn�nt? (Flc asc spaci,): Flat Sum 7. W0111d 'su rat1:_r th.'. com,ril pr000ed within tho ILjt.s of ii.:: fin lnC .s t.l icquir, f:milit'%es, to b, locnt,d in :3to3 solacted in accord-:.nec with it:: bc..:t ,judtg,m, nt? 4. Oth-r Ae feel that nor second choice ne:;iely "The AAj_e 6MVM Property" and toe 75-foot frontaFe on Farah Street and also includixu� the F. H. Johnson Pron=rty mould serve more businesses and be p( far -rester value to the city, _(J Very truly yours, SyyA}A��cc/ERCLGK T;U' �'" X. Bf.RIZ, C'. i;1a1i OPr I!:u B'OT L,,Tt;R Mal NCV,',,"aR lot IF Y' i tah'T A SECOND FOR YOUR L4 UC;Gl T6 PILL 114, PL ..3is C-11, 'rii:: �4ffh ,_. .,u,',,. �..,_i.iva�e3arNMv`.+8'^r .e�-ati",:�e�. �+�,di`��.w. u5au v�at;µ'4.u_..; ia4k3`-wef9,3.'ua..i '•a- ��i"*�-�'x SANDERCOCS TRANSFER CO. 51: San Luca 0*.7.epc City Chamber •f Coxnerce 9W icntorsy Str,et ;an Luis Obispo, California Centle.^.ent At a re42 a,:ato o;:oar oa srsh anC tti;,mr:-tre*tz, or tuec^ Lroad wA Garden, ne are extremely Satere iod in your 4 choice for off-atreat parking, and are eillitq to zontr L,cte aabstantial cash pa;mmnt temard tie purallass, amount to ',,a deter. ;.lincu? :utar. :ouru very trnly, 8WIDfi ta(r.K TUrf—:F'F. CO. QUISTIONNAI r OIl OFT.vTR1ZT PAPIQNO OCT05_ai, 1954 1. Nk=e of your business or property: OLNUMOCi TRAYMER CO., BOX M*# A. L. 0. 2. Address: 3. Your position in firm or status as property caner: hnagow 4. Would you conoidar making a contribution toward a parking lot in Your area? Sa 5. If so, how i uch would you conc•ider? Amount to be in proportion to other donations 6. Would this be a flat sum, or so much a ewnth for five years or other 333dMINIMS methoc: of p:.yyrcwnt? (Please sp::eify): Flat 9uo 7. Would you rather the council proceed within the li:.uts of its finances to acquire facilities, to be located in sites soloctod in accord.shce with its beat judL*om.nt? S. Othur g su stlons: We teal that your oe000d ahoioe naael„r "The WOgts Brown Frnper4y� aid the 95-foot ftentogs on saeah street M4 also including the F. H. Johnson Property would nosh sere Duwimeaaes god bee -roarer value to the city. I1 Very tray ycuro, SATUMCSc ;RAI i'A. 1'u3 zz R3TURN 41+pR9 ; �'ar Q;:,ititll3H OFFIi:d MOT L;:TLR TH.d7 NOV1XBLR lot IF YnU WM n SECOND '�U�:.�TIONiL:IR: FOR Yt':JR L:SiULGCU) TO FILL IN, FLJ;..3i: C..LL TIE,' CH,,,'5 it OFFICE:. • • Agents: BEKfNS VAN IMES tIMQ! 1!'I1 lW lW 0FI6Po• WKFK6FIflL � %o8 BCa[h $trt4[ Mailing Address: P. O. Hox 206 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Getober 2jth, 1954 San Luis Obispo City Chamber rf Commerce 998 Monterey Str=et fan Luis Cbispo, California .ectlenen: As a real estate o:mer on harsh and H.i,;uera Streets, be- tween broad and Garden, we are extremely intere ted in.. your ,#2 choice for off-street parking, and are willing to contribute substantial cash payment toward tae purchase, amount to be deter- o. nod later. Yours very truly, SA':Wd ,,CLJY. {TTI�XR�C'S�'SFEF, X. By���fL'�i""`� QUIST1011rAIRE Or1 OF?-+T!'=,,T PARING OC OB111Rr 195it 1. Name of your business or property: L z. Addrass: IL� 41 /1 r C-VF e.ST 3. Your po ;ition is firm or status as property owner: LVO" 0 WAIE e 4. Would you conaidcr making a contribution towald g pnrkine lot in your ar'n? YF s 5. If so, how much would ynu consider? sp, tc, iz09�1-p A0071L b. WOuld this ba a flat am,, nr so much a rmnth for fiw ynars or other methai of payment? (Fleasc spocifa): rr,t %. Would you rather tha council prm.'Cd within the Units of itr finoncca to aequirr, fncilitios, to h loca',..d In sitos sel:ct.,d / in accord^.nee v4th its b_ •:,t ,judi e�yj%-nt? . y //`1�/ "/ /?'eom'A f go Oth,:r /5 c.NcY a+;rE N��RE //r7EKFb'►r �v►'Pek711V6- ' Pl:-!SE RI-1 ?-'i 01S QMSTION'.IAIRE TO THE NOT I_Ull TH6'rr NOIJDJ73ER lot ZF '_'"•.';: Ii,eGT ,: 53CGi.D LSi;;ifZ0l;nIiU: F4ilt YOi1R L,S'Xk '. iC PILL 1:14, C.,LL M1 v Q1- STIG R76IrE ON OF<I,.TR.G ' fld fiG OC-,12, t2o 1954 i., 2Lwn of your business or proluntl: 3. Your rosition i.: Siam or status as propsrty armor: 14uld you considar making it contrib*ttion toward a pexkin„ lot in your ar,n? 1 a 1. 3. If soy how much woald y+ a consider? 'G. Would Viis be a flat otmy or so 1ateh a Mnth for five years or other mctho'.. of payment? srociiy); +. 7. Would you rathor t.`i.: cmm.,,il rroc 1; •+.. 1i:,1ts of its `. f!"ncas to ncqulrc facilitiot, t. c:,'od iu ;3tus eelected in accord;ncc iith its bc.t it.. l; _.. t Gth_r sub<��st'.ons: � GerLZe �P ; . ^uestior*trP to oc^ Laic offtne. fl,;.ZB ;;i"FIt fi7 , t-:Uf'.ttTIGNT?LIFE TO THE !:(rl L.+t1;R PLA NU✓ sdR 113t SECO%D QCrs>TIGtBidlI .FOR YOUR L,,2:;)i,i+.t0 PO PILL IN, G.,LL T$S QtTBTIO RIIJRE ON UF.'12RCPI PAMKIN3 OCTOBJR, 1954 1. N.vse of your businersoorDproperty: M4RIOIJ� CAFE 2. Addross: 1S ( MMtsA sr, 3. Your position in firm or status as property ormer; W NI:. at "u"" 4. Wrnuld you concid r coking a contribution toward a parkin:; lot in your ar"? Y,E$ 5. If so, how much would you consider? G. Would this be a flat sum, or so much a month for five years or other \m-cthv, of payront? (Flctirc 7. Would you rather tho co,mcil proceed within the limits of its financ<ss to aequim, f:•�ci.lities, to h, locatad in :dtos sel: cted in accordance with its boat judmem�nt? 8. Other cuavcstlons: CI. ;SS i:.i;E;:i 1'I-i1S QUE,TI 7'.Ii�IRE TO THE C:.Ra',H OPr I-;i NOT L1"."L;R 'Tfl,j! h}UVI`.�li 4ai lot IF Yi'!1 G..Nt A 3ECON11 G!1W5TIGt1r:dI1e6 FOR YOUR QI12STI(V1AIRE ON OF.-�+,TRMT PAP'Y.IWC OCTOB.:R, 1954 1. Name of your business or property: "LACTUM N151- 2. Address: 728 HPOUEERA ST., SAH LUIS OBISPO, CALIF. 3, Your Position in firm or status as propW+rty cener; OWNER - LEASIHO STOU 4. Would you conoid_r m0idne a contrilmtion towmd a pcskin; lot in Your ar.:a? YES 5. If so, how much would you consider' $10.00 per month G. Wnuld t::is be a flat sue:, or so much a month for .five years nr other mcthcri of payment? Ulo-:sc spx,ci:p); PA14BU PER MONTH 7. Wo•ild you rather tho COUncilprccded within the li-its of its fin^,nc-zs to Acquire f,,ci.litioc, t» '; locntA Ai '.d tos sclaeted in accord!mce With ita bc:t ju,tfnm, nt? — iir^ 8. Other an?,?soV.ons; A PARi2N0 LOT IS ESSENTIAL IN THIS SEMOH OF 'k:P: CITY. :>n f...� GUfS4I0^L'dlis: TO THE , i :. C(r 1 Z" i W «i let II Y: I lit"! ',FCC;�i> >.1C":,'Ik F'Cat Y(OR ii :1LL Ell S-,.— .-1 L-A WiZTIOMU? I$w ON OF✓-'TF.,S.•^, p1m, '0 OCiOi,?d,R, 1954 1, Lr; L of your business or pror�,rty: {�0„__L n• 2. Address: 3. Your position in firer or status as propz rty owner: 4. Wmrld you conoider asking a contribution towaad a ptxl,<r lot in your aran? W-11-1 5. If so, how much would you consider? 6. Would Vds be a flat mmr, or so :mch a month for fivo yca:rs or other n,.r• .;:yment5 (, -. .. ): SO Q. a- V .. yeu rather the council procood wits, v.. linits of it; fia-,nc::s to acquir,^ Vnd.litius, to b< l.oc in :dtus s_lsted ire .Caord'mco with its bast judfferm nt? st--'ns: t'..7.0 41IE:�I`'—"\•� CiAliaiii OFFICr NOT Li GR TH.:id NOVIViT�fi lER lot IF Y,`I) I-M n Uc0r.D gifl+)TIO?lIIAIRE Fell YOUR L.I DL( 1"T1. 1220 RNO..O RN[R • • TRIZONON[ N ' L. W. KAMM R"L R AT[ SAn L.I. ORrero. CAUFonnu October G, 1954 San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce Osos and Monterey Streets San Luis Obispo, C_1if arnia Gentlemen: T!iis will acknowledge receipt of your letter and questionaire for public off street parking. I cur. particularly interested in your No. 2 item. We own 25 feet of the 75 feet you would have to acquire on Marsh Street. For oar contribution to the off street parking plan, we would be willing to have our property appraised by three disinterested appraisers and from the value they set on the property we would be willing to give the city a substantial discount for our contribution. LWK: j1 6C to City Council. Yours very 'truly, P q,'CS,TIOM,'AIf:E oN OF'—+TR.G,i Fa rm, oCIOUR, 1954 1. ?Jmce of your busine-s or prop,. rty: L. W. Karam: L. Wanda Kamm Wright 2• dddress: Vacant lot 25 feet on Karsh Street 3. Your fasition in firm or status as property owner: owner 4. Would you consider making a contribution tow.ud a parkin; lot in you: aria? As per letter attached. 5. If so, how much would you consider? As per letter attached. G. Would Lids be a flat atm. or so rm:eh a cmnth for five y^_ars or other method of payment? (Floase specify): i,s per letc,er attached. 7. Wo'.11d you rather tho crnmcil proceed within the liiita of its finances to acquire facilities, to b; ].ocottei 8t .3tu3 o-I,,Cted in occordoncc +.dth its bz::t ,Su,-amrnt? $• Oth:..r anyq•:stionn: L. W. Kamm 122d Broad Street San Luis wbispo, Calif. i'M'.SE R 7'FiN f!'1S (aUfSTIOC„IiJPU; TO THE C .0 Ol T;:; t10" i .,R PS I :2 J'^;'tiIR lot ;, Ixsx ...O.O aTllxxr • • nu.Nol.x ion L. W. KAMM REAL ESTATE S.. L.,. OEI.P CALII.R.I. October 6, 195lA, San Luis Obispo C!rlmbor of Commres Uses and Monterey Streets S:n Luis Obispo, C-1 if cro'a GoaileaWnr Tads will acknowledLv receipt of your letter and ;.u8s,ionaim for public of,7 street parking. I u ,eY.1oslsrlq intarasied in yaw No. 2 itan.:o own 4 feet of the 75 feet you would iave to aaqulre on &waa Street. For o.n• 0mtrihution to the off street rarYin plau, ar. would Le willinj to imvs our mperty appmised by three disintores red a;:praiaars aril from tie value t"w as. on tlm prop Ay we wo.ild be willing to give the aity a substantial 3l3count fa am oontributicn. Yours very `.:rilyx L<, Luxtjl W to Cif Couicil. ac.1676 9 '\v OCS 1954 i N REC'Eek�D � o CIW 9�S�hdF Fred H. Johnson FARM IMPLEMENTS and MACHINERY Box 391 1119 Gordan St. Phon. 164 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Cctober 7, 1954 City Council, Fred bnckcin„ er, City Hall, 990 I'alm St., San Luis Obispo, Calif. Dear Sirsp- Topl;;,ing to the letter and questionnaire cent out by the Chamber of Commerce re?ardin7 off- Strect �ar'.cing for the business section of our City. I am in business and a property owner in the bloc': bounded by Higuera 1.:6rsh, Broad and "arden 6troets. I am anxious Und .,..I ling to go along with any reasonable method of obtaining parking space in this block. ..y vacant lot on iT.i;;uer4 at. has not been offered for ealo and if this lot is needed to carry out the project in this area I am trilling to sell and at the same time make my donation as a property o^mer. ay beet vdshoe fnr your success. Q-71STIOtHIGIRE ON UF,--[,TRf7F;;LdTIG OCTCD.iF,, 1954 1. Yes of your businoss or property: DYER'S VARIETY STORE 2. fddrass: 750 HIGUERA STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIF. 3. Your position in firm or status as prop, rty rmmor: ,F C 1 X—NV 4. Wculd you concidor :Vk4 g a contribution tow,ud a pc.rkinq lot in your ar,n? rl- 5. If so. how am wcnld ,you comider? ti 6. Wnuld t';is to a flat sum, or so much •: month for f ive y,;ars.M,n'f- othor :apt, o of %, Woxld you rather t!:o coun:.il pmcncP within th 7.L^i?.. of i*., 4f- t f+,umc::s to acyuinr f uliti::s, to �,- lowrt d in 4tc3 i in .ccord-mcc with it o:.t ,7ud: m• n�? N .1 8. OtY r ou^.^c tons: .V FL::ISE R.7'HN 'M1, QtMTIOW,,IRE TO THE NOT 1—:Z' i!L,A NUTI-JiNH lot IF' h•U Yld;tT ;; 31•:COII; I, ', -: FCH YOOR 'Zt� FILL lid, Ft......;:. W1STIaTNi,IRE ON OF'-£TPSGT PARTING OCTOB-M, 1954 1. N.vice of your business or property; D*lile Balmy 2. Addreos: 723 Higuera 3. Your position in firm or status as property owner: own bakery, not property 4. Would you conoidor .raking a contribution toward a parking lot in your aria? Tea 5. If so, how much world ,you consider? Five Hundred Dollars 6. WOuid this be a flat sur.:, or so much a nonth for five y%rn or other method of payment? (Fl:. aec sn::cifp): payable monthly over a three year period. 7. Woold you rather th, council proccwd within the li,its of it; fur-nca to .%ccuirc fncilitica, to ;c, locst�d in ;3tes selected in accord-=Q with its b,A Jul,.r, n,? 8. Oth';r T,� rt.'.ons: The beet lot for all merchant* is the Maggie Brown porperty. FLF;ZE R-'lt1TRN TN.IL QUE,TIONNdIRE TO THE OPi'IC3 NOT L,ri;R TH,:N NOVQ�!iif,R 1st 1F PC;.i h.iNT ,: SECOND QU.STIOMNAIRG Ftld YOUR L,u.DLUW� Tf FUL IN, Pl.i Ji, C.,LL TU r r r or .o co rn c. w N r w G �' o w ryry�r r � ooy �°t s n r OOy V• m � � H � ry S. OFGµ p �O O Y• r !+ a O m M O M .1t Y O Y O F+ K Y O r VNl O •v8 8 " CVV" 8 8 •O 8 G T8 8 8 8 d 3 Y 2 o 0 O O ?" S 0 B S a• H W 0 O 0 0 R m 1Y� O r m 0 O rS y y � ry m S H m V3' B yy w o �9 O H Q O O J m H a 0 5 CYp• m YO W a�R1 0 m g N m �Wf Y F' A •O� P• m m 0 G c0r pS � 3 O N O W H w o 0 0k a 8 8 em 8 e b C avy 8 8 o e OB w gb P G w a 3 a a 0 a O• a m G v m O J O O N Y m a a 0 i� P �t u I+ m70. •. � c' n m � N • G � m m � ro P M ~ W ••�a]] �-e m F Ate+ ! y M W �KK n O ryrym o � m OC v w �9 •1 F� 3 Fri yO m p w p it c5r ° � •�m{i ~ Ws� h�1 N p y yx m ti b 0 ° ❑£ C>C CnC 3: F+ � `• 1� 9 6 A Fi �+. H V �r •d � g�g MM m W fq •GJ N c* „f 'G O i N m N � m M O < m 0. ti r'o �°�i ay spy A H w M m a 9 & S m a H O O H O m H (D r'1