Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4b. 285 Buena Vista (ARCH-0416-2023) CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: 285 BUENA VISTA (ARCH-0416-2023) - ADDITION TO A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING (CONTRIBUTING LIST RESOURCE) BY: Walter Oetzell, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Leveille, Senior Planner Phone Number: (805) 781-7593 Phone Number: (805) 781-7166 Email: woetzell@slocity.org Email: bleveille@slocity.org APPLICANT: Cheryl O'Conner REPRESENTATIVE: Monique Grajeda RECOMMENDATION Provide a recommendation to the Community Development Director regarding the consistency of the proposed project with applicable historical preservation policies, standards, and guidelines. 1.0 BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to construct an addition to a single-family dwelling designated as a Contributing List Historic Resource (see Project Plans, Attachment A). As provided by the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance, the application is subject to review by the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC), and the Committee will make a recommendation to the Community Development Director as the consistency of the proposed work with the City’s historical preservation policies (§14.01.030). 2.0 DISCUSSION Site and Setting The property is a residential parcel on the north side of Buena Vista Avenue in the Monterey Heights neighborhood. Monterey Heights was subdivided in 1925 using an innovative more "naturalistic" approach to creating the neighborhood, following a popular movement of the early 1920s and 1930s pioneered by Landscape Architect Frederick Law Olmsted, and featuring pocket parks and curvilinear streets, a layout that deviated from the traditional street grid patterns common at the time. 1 1 Discussion summarized from the May 8, 2008 Council Agenda Report prepared for nomination of Monterey Heights properties for historic listing, available online at: http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=32214 Meeting Date: 11/8/2023 Item Number: 4b Time Estimate: 45 Minutes Figure 1: 285 Buena Vista Ave, street (south) elevation Page 45 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 Between 2005 and 2007, the Cultural Heritage Committee surveyed several neighborhoods for potential historic resources, including Monterey Heights. Following the survey, eight properties were added to the Inventory of Historic Resources by the City Council in May 2008; one as a “Master List Property,” and seven, including the subject property, as “Contributing Properties," with adoption of Resolution 9983 (Attachment B). The Contributing Properties were found to contribute to the historic and architectural character of the City and to meet the criteria for inclusion on the Contributing Properties List due to their age, retention of original architectural character, and contribution to the architectural and historical character of the Monterey Heights neighborhood . Property owners were notified of the survey and proposed listings, explaining: “… Contributing properties listing is primarily an honorary designation. Changes to Continuing properties are allowed and require architectural or historical review to ensure that significant exterior changes maintain the building’s original character.” (Correspondence to Property Owners regarding Nominations, April 11, 2008, see Attachment B) 285 Buena Vista Avenue The property is developed with a single-story three-bedroom dwelling constructed in 1931, and a detached garage structure behind the house. Significant alterations to the property appear to be limited to a small addition (148 square-feet, bath and guest room), permitted in 1987. City records (see Attachment C) describe the dwelling as Tudor Revival / Storybook in style, noting several of its characteristic features, including:  Steeply-pitched gable roof; wood shingles  Small decorated gables on front elevation  Rough-finished stucco siding  Rectangular windows; fixed pane windows with diamond-shaped divided lites  Raised front porch within gabled extension; brick arcade opening and quoins  Two brick chimneys (only one remaining)  Ornamental windows and canales (decorative tile vents) in gable faces  Half-timbering effects Project Description The applicant proposes to construct an addition of about 250 square feet in area to the front of the dwelling (see Project Plans, Attachment A. and Figure 2), extending the façade at its southeast corner toward the front of the building by about 14 feet, to accomm odate an expanded kitchen. The addition will replace the existing front gable on the right side of the building façade with a larger and taller gable feature, projecting about seven feet in front of the remaining wall plane. Plans depict half -timber decoration and replacement windows with diamond-pattern. Page 46 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 The deck in front of the kitchen, and the double doors leading to it, will also be extended to the front. A new gable feature is introduced to the left side of the façade, at the Living Room, and is proposed to accommodate a bay window. The existing small gable in the east wall of the building is retained and incorporated into the new addition, but the other east-facing gable in the middle of the building (behind the porch gable) will be obscured (see Figure 3). 3.0 EVALUATION The General Plan sets out, in the Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE), the City’s goals and policies for historical and architectural resources (COSE §3.2). These policies are implemented by the Historic Preservation Ordinance (SLOMC Ch. 14.01) and the supporting Historic Preservation Program Guidelines (HPPG). The Guidelines, in turn, rely on evaluation of consistency with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (SOI Standards).2 General Plan www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community- development/planning-zoning/general-plan HPO www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/4142/635497652808330000 HPPG www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/4144/635497652811770000 SOI Standards www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/16940/636413316321170000 2 Kay D. Weeks and Anne E. Grimmer. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service; Technical Preservation Services, 2017 Figure 2: Front (South) Elevation: existing (left), proposed (right) Figure 3: Right Side (East) Elevation: existing (left), proposed (right) Page 47 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 General Plan 3.3.1. Historic preservation Significant historic and architectural resources should be identified, preserved and rehabilitated 3.3.2. Demolitions Historically or architecturally significant buildings shall not be demolished or substantially changed in outward appearance, unless doing so is necessary to remove a threat to health and safety and other means to eliminate or reduce the threat to acceptable levels are infeasible 3.3.4. Changes to historic buildings Changes or additions to historically or architecturally significant buildings should be consistent with the original structure and follow the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings. […] The street appearance of buildings which contribute to a neighborhood's architectural character should be maintained The property is included in the City’s Inventory of Historic Resources as a Contributing List Resource.3 As discussed in more detail below, the focus of interest with the work proposed under this application is the change in the outward appearance of the dwelling, including its street appearance, and whether the work can be considered consistent with guidance provided in SOI Standards. Historic Preservation Program Guidelines 3.4.1(d) Additions Additions to listed historic structures should maintain the structure’s original architectural integrity and closely match the building’s original architecture, or match additions that have achieved historic significance in their own right, in terms of scale, form, massing, rhythm, fenestration, materials, color and architectural details 3.4.1(f) Consistency required Alterations to listed historic resources shall be approved only upon finding that the proposed work is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, any required historic preservation report, General Plan policies, the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and these Guidelines 3 Contributing List Resources or Properties: Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute, either by themselves or in conjunction with other structures, to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole (Historic Preservation Ordinance). Page 48 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 Proposed work for minor additions and alterations to historically listed structures must be consistent with guidelines for Changes to Historic Resources set out in § 3.4 of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. These guidelines are concerned with the retention of character-defining features of the structure and its integrity, with consistency and compatibility in form, style, and character, and with the consistency of proposed work with SOI Standards. In addition to information from the City’s Historic Context Statement, the Guidelines provide details about the characteristic features of the Tudor Revival style (see Attachment D), which include:  Asymmetrical façade; varied eave line height  Plaster, stucco, or brick exterior siding, typically with half -timbering  Steeply (pitched) gable and hipped roofs; prominent front-facing gable  Wooden shingles, occasionally imitating thatch  Tall, narrow divided-light windows, casement or double-hung sash  May display picture windows with leaded diamond panes  Small gabled entry porch, often with arched openings  Stone or brick accents or faux quoining The proposed addition and alterations are situated on the primary building elevation visible from the street. Although the roofline and the scale and arrangement of gabled roof forms is altered, the design of the addition is intended to continue the Tudor Revival Style, retaining an asymmetrical façade, stucco siding, steep gables, including a prominent front-facing gable, and characteristic diamond-paned windows and brick accents. The Committee should consider whether the proposed addition is a close match to the building’s original Tudor Revival architecture, such that the structure’s original architectural integrity4 is maintained, as directed by HPPG § 3.4.1 (d). Opportunity may exist for refinements to ensure a close match, including close attention to the height and slope of the new primary gable feature (on the east side of the building) to achieve appropriate form and proportion, the appropriateness of the new secondary gable on the west side of the building, and the scale and form of the proposed new bay window. The Committee’s recommendation to the Director may include guidance on these or other refinements, to be addressed in greater detail with final action on the application. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 4 Integrity, Architectural or Historical: the ability of a property, structure, site, building, improvement or natural feature to convey its identity and authenticity, including but not limited to its original location, period(s) of construction, setting, scale, design, materials, detailing, workmanship, uses and association (Historic Preservation Ordinance). Page 49 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. SOI Standards provide general guidance about new exterior additions to historic buildings: … the Rehabilitation guidelines emphasize that new additions should be considered only after it is determined that meeting specific new needs cannot be achieved by altering non-character-defining interior spaces. If the use cannot be accommodated in this way, then an attached exterior addition may be considered. New additions should be designed and constructed so that the character-defining features of the historic building, its site, and setting are not negatively impacted. Generally, a new addition should be subordinate to the historic building. A new addition should be compati ble, but differentiated enough so that it is not confused as historic or original to the building… (SOI Standards pg. 79). More specific guidance is provided regarding approaches to work treatments and techniques that are either consistent (“Recommended”) or inconsistent (“Not Recommended”) with the Standards, specific to various features of historic buildings and sites, as discussed below. Roofs Recommended Not Recommended Identifying, retaining, and preserving roofs and their functional and decorative features that are important in defining the overall historic character of the building. The form of the roof (gable, hipped, gambrel, flat, or mansard) is significant, as are its decorative and functional features (such as cupolas, cresting, parapets, monitors, chimneys, weather vanes, dormers, ridge tiles, and snow guards), roofing material (such as slate, wood, clay tile, metal, roll roofing or asphalt shingles), and size, color, and patterning. Removing or substantially changing roofs which are important in defining the overall historic character of the building so that, as a result, the character is diminished. Changing the configuration or shape of a roof by adding highly visible new features (such as dormer windows, vents, skylights, or a penthouse)." Page 50 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 The Committee should consider whether the proposed changes to the alteration of the roof line and gabled roof forms are significant, and whether they would result in a diminishment of the historic character of the building, contrary to the guidance fr om SOI Standards. While characteristic forms are altered by the addition, the new construction utilizes materials, forms, and details that are also characteristic of the Tudor Revival Style, aiming to maintain the building’s architectural style. New Exterior Additions Recommended Not Recommended Constructing a new addition on a secondary or non-character-defining elevation and limiting its size and scale in relationship to the historic building. Constructing a new addition on or adjacent to a primary elevation of the building which negatively impacts the building’s historic character. Constructing a new addition that results in the least possible loss of historic materials so that character-defining features are not obscured, damaged, or destroyed. Attaching a new addition in a manner that obscures, damages, or destroys character- defining features of the historic building. Using the same forms, materials, and color range of the historic building in a manner that does not duplicate it, but distinguishes the addition from the original building. Duplicating the exact form, material, style, and detailing of the historic building in a new addition so that the new work appears to be historic. The addition is proposed to be constructed on the building’s primary street-facing front elevation. Site area does exist for addition to the rear, less visible, portion of the building, into the rear yard area, but is somewhat constrained by the upward slope of the property. The purpose of the addition is to extend the existing kitchen which is located at the front corner of the home, presenting little practical opportunity to expand by adding to the opposite corner, at the rear of building. Avoidance of a primary elevation is, in this case, balanced against the need to provide for continued of a structure, with attention to maintaining the building’s historic character. The building remains a single-story in height, and with the addition it is generally consistent with the size, proportion, and massing of a typical single-family dwelling. In its use of a steep primary gable, maintenance of an asymmetrical façade, and characteristic decorative details, the design of the addition, while not seeking to exactly duplicate building details, nevertheless attempts to maintain a n appearance in keeping with the original architectural design and to retain the building’s historic character. Summary The applicant has proposed an addition to a primary building elevation that alters the building’s outward appearance but employs characteristic features of the Tudor Revival style to avoid diminishing its architectural character. The Committee should consider whether the proposed design of the addition achieves the purpose of applicable preservation policies and standards, consistent with its status as a Contributing List Resource, and whether the changes maintain the building’s original character as Page 51 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 communicated in the April 11, 2008 correspondence to property owners, such that a positive recommendation can be provided to the Director regarding the project’s consistency with those policies and standards. The Committee may also consider recommended conditions of approval for final action that could inform minor design revisions that would enhance preservation and maintenance of the building’s architectural and historic integrity. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Construction of an addition to an existing structure is categorically exempt from CEQA environmental review, as Existing Facilities (CEQA Guidelines § 15301 (e)). 5.0 ACTION ALTERNATIVES 1. Recommend that the Community Development Director find the project consistent with the City's historical preservation policies, with any suggested conditions of approval necessary to ensure this consistency. This is the action recommended by staff, as diminishment of the Contributing Resource’s significance can be avoided by designing the proposed addition using characteristics of the building’s Tudor Revival style. 2. Continue review to another date with direction to staff and applicant. This action is only recommended should Committee review of substantial revisions to the project design be necessary in order to avoid diminishment of the significance of the Contributing Resource by construction of the proposed addition, 3. Recommend that the Community Development Director find the project inconsistent with historical preservation policies, citing specific areas of inconsistency. This action not recommended at this time, as the proposed addition is designed following the building’s Tudor Revival style, and opportunity exists to modify or refine the project design where necessary to achieve the intent of applicable preservation policies and standards. Page 52 of 78 Item 4b ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Cultural Heritage Committee Report – October 23, 2023 6.0 ATTACHMENTS A - Project Plans (285 Buena Vista) B - Resolution 9983 (2008) & Correspondence to Property Owners C - Property Information (285 Buena Vista) D - Tudor Revival Style (Context Statement, HPPG) Page 53 of 78 Page 54 of 78 Page 55 of 78 Page 56 of 78 Page 57 of 78 Page 58 of 78 Page 59 of 78 Page 60 of 78 Page 61 of 78 Page 62 of 78 Page 63 of 78 Page 64 of 78 O O RESOLUTION NO. 9983 (2008 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING 2243 SANTA YNEZ TO THE MASTER LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES AND PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2859 405, AND 495 BUENA VISTA, 398 SAN MIGUEL, 2102, 2122, AND 2160 LOOMIS TO THE CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. WHEREAS, in 1983 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5197 establishing the "Master List of Historic Resources" and "Contributing Properties List" (collectively referred to as "Historic Resources "), along with procedures for adding properties to the listing; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 2008, the Cultural Heritage Committee held a public hearing to consider recommending to the City Council the addition of eight properties in the City of San Luis Obispo to the Historic Resource List due to their historical and/or architectural significance to their neighborhood and to the community; and WHEREAS, at said meetings, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed the historical documentation on the property of 2243 Santa Ynez and recommended that the City Council add the property to the Master List of Historic Resources; and WHEREAS, at said meetings, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed the historical documentation on the following properties and recommended that the City Council add these properties to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources: 1. 285, 405, and 495 Buena Vista 2. 398 San Miguel 3. 2102, 2122, and 2160 Loomis WHEREAS, this City Council considered this recommendation at an advertised public meeting on May 20, 2008 pursuant to historic preservation guidelines established by Council Resolution No. 6157 1987 Series). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that based on the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation, documentation as described in the Historical Resource Inventory for each property, on file in the Community Development Department, public testimony, the staff report, and on the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines the following: SECTION 1. Addition to the Master List of Historic Resources. The property located at 2243 Santa Ynez has been found to meet the eligibility criteria for inclusion on the Master List of Historic Resources due to its unique design and exceptional masonry craftsmanship, and is hereby added to the Master List of Historic Resources as a Type 5 property, and shall be designated as the historic "Faulstich House." SECTION 2. Addition to Contributing Properties List. The following properties have been found to contribute to the historic and architectural character of the City and to meet the criteria for inclusion on the Contributing Properties List due to their age, retention of original architectural character, and contribution to the architectural and historical character of the Monterey Heights neighborhood and are hereby deemed Contributing Properties: Page 65 of 78 Resolution No. 9983 (2008 Series) Page 2 1. 285, 405, and 495 Buena Vista 2. 398 San Miguel 3. 2102, 2122, and 2160 Loomis SECTION 3. Environmental Determination. The City Council hereby determines that this action is not a "project" as defined in Article 20 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) since it does not have the potential for resulting in a physical change in the environment, and therefore, is not subject to environmental review requirements. SECTION 4. Publish Revised Contributing Properties List. The Community Development Director is hereby directed to amend the Contributing Properties and Master Lists to include the properties listed above and to publish revised historic resource listings for public distribution. SECTION 5, Recording of Historic Properties. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record the properties' historic designation with the County Recorder, pursuant to State Law. On motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Mulholland and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Carter, Mulholland, and Settle, Vice Mayor Brown and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of May 2008. S Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Audrey Hoo City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jo4g !well City Attorney Page 66 of 78 Page 67 of 78 Page 68 of 78 Page 69 of 78 Page 70 of 78 Page 71 of 78 Page 72 of 78 Page 73 of 78 Page 74 of 78 Page 75 of 78 Page 76 of 78 29 Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival style is one of a series of revivals that gained popularity in the 1920s and 1930s in San Luis Obispo. This revival style is a reinterpretation of late Medieval English houses. Many of the houses in the Mt. Pleasanton-Anholm area fall into this style. Detail characteristics include: Characteristic features include: -steeply gable and hipped roofs -varied eave line height -decorative half-timbering -plaster or brick exterior siding -wooden shingles, occasionally imitating thatch Examples of this style include: The J.J. Dunne House at 59 Benton Way The Vard Shepherd House at 148 Broad Street Page 77 of 78 City of San Luis Obispo Architectural Character Citywide Historic Context Statement HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP 142  TUDOR REVIVAL The Tudor Revival style is loosely based on a variety of Medieval English building traditions. In the United States, these traditions are combined freely, but retain the steeply-pitched front-facing gable which is almost universally present as a dominant façade element. The style’s popularity expanded dramatically in the 1920s and early 1930s, when masonry veneering techniques allowed even the most modest examples to mimic closely the brick and stone exteriors seen on English prototypes. The Storybook cottage is a more whimsical version of Tudor Revival. Storybook residences typically feature roofs laid in irregular patterns and rolled eaves to suggest thatching, eyebrow arches over entries and dormers, and exterior walls with irregular plaster finish. The Storybook style was particularly popular in Hollywood where motion picture set designers sometimes moonlighted as architects. Character-defining features include:  Asymmetrical facade  Steeply-pitched gabled roof with a prominent front-facing gable  Stucco or brick exterior wall cladding, typically with half-timbering  Tall, narrow divided-light windows, casement or double-hung sash, often arranged in multiples  May display picture windows with leaded diamond panes  Small gabled entry porch, often with arched openings  Details may include stone or brick accents or faux quoining 236 Broad Street. Source: City of San Luis Obispo. 1167 Marsh Street, 1930.Source: Historic Resources Group. 752 Mission Street, 1931. Source: Historic Resources Group. Dunne House, 59 Benton Way, 1927. Source City of San Luis Obispo. Page 78 of 78 City of San Luis Obispo quadient LU Community Development Department. ti 919 Palm Street .. FIRST-CLASS MAIL IMI Fz San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 $OOO. rJ1 ° z t 1liO3/2023 ZIP 93401 043M312"'0914 PROJECT SITE MAP: 1? SUENA VISTA MCCOLLUM ST SLID CITY OF ATTN: ADMINISTRATION 990 PALM ST SLO, CA, 93401 NOV 2023 SW linty OL IK City of Scan Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage Committee Hearing Notice What: Address of Application: 285 Buena Vista Ave (ARCH -0416-20231. Architectural Review of an addition to a single-family dwelling on property listed in the Inventory of Historic Resources as a Contributing List Resource, including modification of the facade and roofline of the building, and replacement of the front entry stairs and landing, and expansion of the front deck (categorically exempt from CEQA environmental review) . Where: Council Chambers at City,Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA. When: November 8, 2023 at p.m. For more information, staff reports will be available online in advance of the hearing date at ht[;s://www.slocity.org/government/mayor- and-city-council/agendas-and-minutes Contact: Walter Oetzell - (805) 781-7593 - woetzell@slocity.org - or - (805) 781-7170 Anyone is welcome to comment on the proposal. An action of the Cultural Heritage Committee is typically a recommendation to the City's Community Development Director, Planning Commission or City Council, and therefore is not final. Please note that any court challenge related to the recommendation on this item may be limited to considering only those issues raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence received prior to, the public hearing. 11‐08‐2023 Item 4b ‐ Staff Presentation 1 ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Remodel and addition to a single-family dwelling (Contributing List Property) The CHC shall make recommendations to decision-making bodies on the application of architectural, historic, and cultural preservation standards and guidelines to projects and approvals involving historic sites, districts, and structures The Committee shall review and make recommendations to the Director on applications and development review projects which include new construction, additions or alterations on historically listed properties 1 2 11‐08‐2023 Item 4b ‐ Staff Presentation 2 3 4 11‐08‐2023 Item 4b ‐ Staff Presentation 3 Historic Resources Survey (Monterey Heights) 5 6 11‐08‐2023 Item 4b ‐ Staff Presentation 4 General Plan Changes or additions to historically or architecturally significant buildings  should be consistent with the original structure and follow the Secretary of  the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings. […] The  street appearance of buildings which contribute to a neighborhood's  architectural character should be maintained. § 3.3.1 Changes to Historic  Buildings Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Additions to listed historic structures should maintain the structure’s original  architectural integrity and closely match the building’s original architecture,  or match additions that have achieved historic significance in their own  right, in terms of scale, form, massing, rhythm, fenestration, materials, color  and architectural details. § 3.4.1 (d)  Additions Alterations to listed historic resources shall be approved only upon finding  that the proposed work is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s  Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, any required historic  preservation report, General Plan policies, the Historic Preservation  Ordinance, and these Guidelines. § 3.4.1 (f)  Consistency required 7 8 11‐08‐2023 Item 4b ‐ Staff Presentation 5 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (Rehabilitation) Not RecommendedRecommended Constructing a new addition on or adjacent to a  primary elevation of the building which negatively  impacts the building’s historic character. Constructing a new addition on a secondary or  non‐character‐ defining elevation and limiting its  size and scale in relationship to the historic  building. Attaching a new addition in a manner that  obscures, damages, or destroys character‐ defining features of the historic building. Constructing a new addition that results in the  least possible loss of historic materials so that  character‐defining features are not obscured,  damaged, or destroyed. Duplicating the exact form, material, style, and  detailing of the historic building in a new addition  so that the new work appears to be historic.  Using the same forms, materials, and color range  of the historic building in a manner that does not  duplicate it, but distinguishes the addition from  the original building. Removing or substantially changing roofs which  are important in defining the overall historic  character of the building so that, as a result, the  character is diminished. Identifying, retaining, and preserving roofs and  their functional and decorative features that are  important in defining the overall historic character  of the building. The form of the roof is significant,  as are its decorative and functional features,  roofing material, and size, color, and patterning. 9 10 11‐08‐2023 Item 4b ‐ Staff Presentation 6 ARCH-0416-2023 (285 Buena Vista) Remodel and addition to a single-family dwelling (Contributing List Property) Action Provide a recommendation to the Community Development Director regarding the consistency of the new construction with the City’s historical preservation policies… 11 11/08/2023 Item 4b Applicant Photos 1 1 2 11/08/2023 Item 4b Applicant Photos 2 3