HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-09-2023 IOC Agenda PacketCity of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission
Agenda
INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
Thursday, November 9, 2023
3:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING Conference Room 6
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Emily Jackson
ROLL CALL: Committee Members Natalie Harnett, Derek Johnson, Debbie Malicoat,
Erica A. Stewart, Anni Wang, and Chair Emily Jackson
OTHERS PRESENT: Monique S. Spkye, PFM Asset Management LLC, Sarah Walsh, PFM
Asset Management LLC, and Teresa Purrington, Recording Secretary
PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the
agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address.
Comments are limited to three minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred
to staff and, if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of the Investment Oversight Committee of August 10, 2023.
BUSINESS ITEMS
2. Presentation of the Quarterly Investment Report on Portfolio Performance & Economic
Recommendation: Receive and confirm investment policy compliance.
Investment Oversight Committee Agenda for Thursday, November 9, 2023 Page 2
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
3. Staff Updates and agenda forecast
ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the Investment Oversight Committee is scheduled for
Thursday, February 15, 2024, at 3:00 p.m., in Conference Room 6, 990 Palm Street, San Luis
Obispo, California.
The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the
public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to
persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or
accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the Finance
Department at (805) 781-7125 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7107.
Meeting audio recordings can be found at the following web address:
http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/fol/61037/Row1.aspx
Minutes - Draft
Investment Oversight Committee
Thursday, August 10, 2023
Regular Meeting of the Investment Oversight Committee
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular meeting of the Investment Oversight Committee was called to order on Thursday, August
10, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
by Chair Jackson.
ROLL CALL
Present: Committee Members Natalie Harnett, Erica A. Stewart, Debbie Malicoat, Anni
Wang and Chair Emily Jackson.
Absent: Committee Member Derek Johnson
Others Present: Sarah Walsh, and Monique Spyke, PFM Asset Management LLC.
PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None
--End of Public Comment--
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Review of Minutes of the Investment Oversight Committee Meeting of May 11, 2023
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
--End of Public Comment--
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER WANG SECONDED BY
COMMITTEE MEMBER HARNETT CARRIED 5-0-1 (COMMITTEE MEMBER
JOHNSON ABSENT), to approve the May 11, 2023, minutes, as presented.
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
Minutes - Investment Oversight Committee Minutes of Thursday August 10, 2023 Page 2
BUSINESS ITEMS
2. Presentation of the Quarterly Investment Report on Portfolio Performance & Economic
Outlook
Monique Spyke, and Sarah Walsh, for PFM Asset Management LLC, provided an update via
PowerPoint presentation and responded to Committee inquiries.
Public Comment
None
--End of Public Comment--
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER MALICOAT, SECONDED BY
COMMITTEE MEMBER WANG, 5-0-1 (WITH COMMITTEE MEMBER JOHNSON
ABSENT), to approve the recommendation to accept the report.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 3:53 p.m. The next Regular Meeting of the Investment
Oversight Committee is scheduled for Thursday, November 9, 2023, at 3:00 p.m.
APPROVED BY INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE: XX/XX/XXXX
Quarterly Investment Report
AS OF September 30, 2023
This report presents the City’s investment portfolio for
the quarter ending September 30, 2023. It has been
prepared to comply with regulations contained in
California Government Code Section 53646. The report
includes all investments managed by the City on its
own behalf as well as for other third-party agencies on
a fiduciary basis such as the Whale Rock Commission.
It also includes all City related investments held by
trustees for bond debt service obligations. As required,
the report provides information on the investment type,
issuer, maturity date, cost, and current market value for
each security.
Market Considerations
U.S. economic conditions were
characterized by:
•Strong than expected growth,
supported by a resilient
consumer
•Inflation that remains stubbornly
above the Federal Reserve’s
(“Fed”) target range
•Continued creation of new jobs
by the labor market, albeit at a
moderating pace
The Fed held rates steady at the
September FOMC meeting as
expected. The Fed’s most recent
“dot plot” indicated one more rate
hike for 2023 and set the stage for
interest rates to remain “higher-for-
longer.”
The U.S. government rating
downgrade by Fitch had little impact,
although it highlighted growing worry
about the erosion of governance
standards and fiscal irresponsibility.
Source: Bloomberg as of September 30, 2023.
5.45%
5.04%
4.61%4.57%4.70%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%YieldMaturity
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
September 30, 2023
June 30, 2023
3-Month 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 30-Year
0.23%
0.52%
1.07%
0.30%
0.57%
0.00%
0.25%
0.50%
0.75%
1.00%
1.25%U.S. TreasuryAgencyABSCorp A-AAACorp BBB1-5 Year Indices Quarterly Returns
5.6%5.1%
3.9%
2.9%2.5%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
2023 2024 2025 2026 Longer
Run
Federal Funds Rate
June Projections September Projections
3.3%
2.5%2.2%2.0%2.0%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
2023 2024 2025 2026 Longer
Run
PCE Inflation
June Projections September Projections
What we are watching…
Headline inflation numbers continued
trending lower, but the Fed’s preferred
measure of “supercore inflation” has
shown little sign of slowing. The labor
market continues to appear as strong
as ever.
The Fed reached a pausing point in
their rate hike cycle after the most
aggressive series of rate hikes in
recent history. There is potential for
another additional rate hike by the end
of the year according to the Fed’s
most recent dot plot. As a result, both
the U.S. Treasury yield curve and fed
funds futures have indicated that
investors have become more
accepting of a “higher for longer”
overnight rate environment.
We will likely continue to maintain a
defensive duration bias as the curve
remains near historically extreme
levels of inversion, while remaining
nimble to extend as yields reach
opportunistic levels.
Source: Federal Reserve, latest economic projections as of September 2023.
2.1%
1.5%
1.8%1.8%1.8%
0%
1%
2%
3%
2023 2024 2025 2026 Longer
Run
Change in Real GDP
June Projections September Projections
3.8%4.1%4.1%4.0%4.0%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2023 2024 2025 2026 Longer
Run
Unemployment Rate
June Projections September Projections
Current Cash and Investment Summary
The following is a summary of the City’s cash
and investments based on market value, as of
September 30, 2023, compared to the prior
quarter.
Investment Entity September 30, 2023 Percent of Total June 30, 2023
City Held Cash & Investments $12,096,882.69 5.8%$36,417,467.39
JPMorgan Money Market Account $50,000,000.00 24.0%$50,000,000.00
LAIF Held Investments $45,616,465.55 21.9%$45,261,270.26
PFMAM Managed Investments*$100,906,981.38 48.4%$100,412,987.45
TOTAL**$208,620,329.62 100%$232,091,725.10
*Figures shown exclude accrued interest. **Details may not add up to total due to rounding.
Current Cash and Investment Summary
There are several factors
which result in changes in
cash and investment
balances from month-to-
month and quarter-to-
quarter, dependent on the
receipt of revenues or a
large disbursement.
•Some major City revenues are received on a
periodic rather than a monthly basis. Property Tax
is received in December, January, April, and May
of each year. Transient Occupancy Tax is
received monthly but varies considerably due to
seasonality.
•Payments for bonded indebtedness or large
capital projects can reduce the portfolio
substantially in the quarter in which they occur.
•The City pays its CalPERS obligation in a lump
sum at the beginning of the fiscal year to achieve
interest savings.
Factors
Securities
Securities in the City’s
portfolio are priced by
Refinitiv, an independent
pricing service, at the end
of every month. In some
cases, the City may have
investments with a current
market value that is greater
or less than the recorded
value. These changes in
market value are due to
fluctuations in the
marketplace, having no
effect on yield, as the City
does not intend to sell
securities prior to maturity.
Nevertheless, these
market changes can
impact the total value of
the portfolio.
Security Type Market Value
% of
Portfolio
% Change
vs. 6/30/23
Permitted by
Policy
U.S. Treasury 56,126,076 55.4%-8.8%100%
Federal Agency 17,594,806 17.4%-13.9%100%
Municipal Obligations 1,707,663 1.7%-18.2%30%
Negotiable CDs 1,958,678 1.9%100.0%30%
Corporate Notes 17,146,091 16.9%14.9%30%
Asset-Backed
Securities 4,144,901 4.1%857.9%15%
Securities Sub-Total 98,678,216 -1.7%
Money Market Fund 2,228,766 2.2%15,132.9%20%
Accrued Interest 414,752 0.4%
Securities Total 101,321,733 100.0%0.9%
PFMAM Managed 9/30/2023 6/30/2023
Average Maturity
(Years)2.37 2.17
Effective Duration1 2.07 2.00
Average Market Yield 5.13%4.80%
Total Return
Total return is calculated
based on interest and both
realized and unrealized
changes in market value;
this is expressed as a rate
of return over a specified
period of time based on
cost and is backward-
looking.
•Focused on long-term
performance and
growth
•Affected by both yield
and market value
fluctuations
•Reflects “true value” of
the portfolio
•Recommended
approach by the
Government Finance
Officers Association
Total Rate
of Return 3 Months 1 Year 3 Years Since
Inception
City of SLO 0.52%2.84%-0.82%1.14%
0-5 Treasury
Index 0.50%2.67%-1.04%0.94%
Variance +0.02%+0.17%+0.22%+0.20%
1Effective duration is the approximate percentage change in price for each 1 % change in interest rates.
Investment Objectives
The investment objectives of the City of San Luis Obispo are first, to
provide safety of principal to ensure the preservation of capital in the
overall portfolio; second, to provide sufficient liquidity to meet all
operating requirements; and third, to earn a commensurate rate of
return consistent with the constraints imposed by the safety and
liquidity objectives. The City follows the practice of pooling cash and
investments for all funds under its direct control. Funds held by outside
fiscal agents under provisions of bond indentures are maintained
separately. Interest earned on pooled cash and investments is
allocated quarterly to the various Quarterly Investment Report funds
based on the respective fund’s average quarterly cash balance.
Interest earned from cash and investments with fiscal agents is
credited directly to the related accounts.
It is common for governments to pool the cash and investments of
various funds to improve investment performance. By pooling funds,
the City can benefit from economies of scale, diversification, liquidity,
and ease of administration. The City uses the services of an
investment advisor, PFM Asset Management, to manage a portion of
the City’s portfolio. The City’s strategy is to retain approximately 25%
of the portfolio to manage its day-to-day cash flow needs, while PFM’s
focus is on longer-term investment management. In addition, the City
has retained direct control of several investments that had been
acquired before the City began to use investment advisors. All
investments are held by the City in a safekeeping account with Bank of
New York Mellon, except for investments held by trustees related to
bond financings, which are held by either US Bank or Bank of New
York Mellon.
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investment Objectives
ESG investing is the process of incorporating the
analysis of non-financial environmental, social,
and governance factors into investment decisions
alongside traditional financial criteria. As set forth
in the City’s Investment Management Plan dated
August 18, 2020, it is City’s objective to integrate
environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”)
factors into investment decisions for its
investment portfolio to the extent practical and
possible.
In order to achieve this objective, the City will
apply the ESG Investment Criteria to the following
Investments: Asset-Backed Securities, Bankers’
Acceptances, Commercial Paper, Corporate,
Medium-Term & Bank Notes, and Negotiable Bank
Deposit Obligations.
The ESG investment criteria is based on ESG Risk
Ratings, industry and subindustry definitions, and
subindustry rankings as provided by
Sustainalytics.
Market Value includes accrued interest as of September 30, 2023. Average ESG Risk Rating is weighted by market value. Please see
important disclosures at the end of this presentation.
U.S. Treasury and municipal obligations are not included in the analysis.
ESG Risk Composition Overview
The ESG Risk Rating measures
economic value at risk based
on ESG factors.
A company’s ESG Risk Rating is
comprised of a quantitative score
and a risk category. The score
indicates unmanaged ESG risk.
Risk categories are absolute
and comparable across
industries.
Lower scores represent less
unmanaged risk. Ratings are
scored on a scale of 1-100 and
are assigned to one of the
following ESG risk categories:
•Negligible Risk (overall score
of 0-9.99 points)
•Low Risk (10-19.99 points)
•Medium Risk (20-29.99
points)
•High Risk (30-39.99 points)
•Severe Risk (40 and higher
points)
29/35 of portfolio issuers are rated with a total rated market value of $41.1 million (41%)
Negligible Low Medium High Severe
Portfolio Average
ESG Risk Rating
19.5
Allocation by ESG Risk Rating
Low
24%
Medium
17%
High
<1%
Not Rated
58%
Industry Diversification
Portfolio holdings and Sustainalytics data as of September 30, 2023. Average ESG Risk Rating represents the market value -weighted
average ESG risk rating for each industry.
29.3
19.4 19.1
25.3
23.2
17.7
15.8
18.9
15.1
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
0
10
20
30
40
Portfolio Weight (%)ESG Risk RatingIndustry Exposure and Weighted Average Risk Score
S&P Credit Rating Distribution
ESG Risk Rating Key
Negligible Low Medium High Severe
0-9.99 10-19.99 20-29.99 30-39.99 40-100
Portfolio holdings and Sustainalytics data as of September 30, 2023. If a security is not rated by S&P, the equivalent Moody’s rating is
used. NR stands for ‘no rating’ and implies that the issuer is not rated by S&P or Moody’s but is rated by Fitch.
$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25
A
AA
AAA
Market Value Allocation (Millions $)
Credit Rating Grouped by ESG Risk Rating Category
21.0 17.5
21.8
0
10
20
30
40
AAA AA A
Average ESG Risk Rating by S&P Credit Rating
Holdings as of September 30, 2023
Sorted by ESG Risk Rating
Source: Sustainalytics. Holdings as of September 30, 2023.
Issuer % Weight Subindustry Subindustry
Percentile
ESG Risk
Rating
9/30/2023
Coöperatieve Rabobank
U.A.1.0%Diversified Banks 2 10.0
CarMax Inc.0.2%Automotive Retail 20 12.1
Adobe Systems Inc 0.6%Enterprise and
Infrastructure Software 3 13.1
The Home Depot Inc 1.0%Home Improvement
Retail 19 13.3
Federal National Mortgage
Association 9.4%Thrifts and Mortgages 7 14.1
Target Corp 0.7%Department Stores 7 14.4
Microsoft Corp 1.6%Enterprise and
Infrastructure Software 5 15.1
Novartis AG 1.5%Pharmaceuticals 1 16.2
Fifth Third Bancorp 0.7%Regional Banks 9 16.8
Mastercard Incorporated 0.6%Data Processing 20 17.1
Pfizer Inc 1.1%Pharmaceuticals 2 18.5
American Express
Company 0.8%Consumer Finance 13 18.6
Federal Home Loan Bank
System 2.8%Consumer Finance 14 18.7
Intel Corp 0.5%Semiconductor Design
and Manufacturing 13 18.9
Kubota Corp 0.3%Agricultural Machinery 20 19.7
The Toronto-Dominion Bank 1.0%Diversified Banks 17 19.8
Deere & Co 0.8%Agricultural Machinery 26 20.0
Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corp 5.6%Thrifts and Mortgages 20 20.2
Bank of New York Mellon
Corp 0.9%Asset Management and
Custody Services 12 20.9
Holdings as of September 30, 2023
Sorted by ESG Risk Rating
Source: Sustainalytics. Holdings as of September 30, 2023.
Issuer % Weight Subindustry Subindustry
Percentile
ESG Risk
Rating
9/30/2023
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company 0.3%Biotechnology 9 22.7
Walmart Inc.1.3%Food Retail 48 25.3
The PNC Financial Services
Group, Inc.0.7%Regional Banks 35 26.1
PACCAR Inc 0.8%Heavy Machinery and
Trucks 40 27.6
Bank of America
Corporation 1.9%Diversified Banks 57 28.3
Honda Motor Co Ltd 0.7%Automobiles 75 28.7
Citigroup, Inc.1.5%Diversified Banks 62 29.2
JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.9%Diversified Banks 63 29.3
Toyota Motor Corp 0.8%Automobiles 83 29.8
Amazon.com Inc 0.3%Online and Direct
Marketing Retail 98 30.6
(continued)
Socially Responsible Investment Policy
In addition to the ESG
criteria, the City’s Socially
Responsible Investment
(SRI) Policy restricts portfolio
issuers who generate
revenue from casinos,
gambling, racetracks,
brewery, wine/spirits,
tobacco, electronic cigarette,
or tobacco-related products,
or who support the direct
production or drilling of fossil
fuels. The tables to the right
show the Bloomberg Industry
Classifications (“BICS”) for all
the portfolio’s holdings.
Issuer Sector (BICS)
Adobe Inc Software & Services
Amazon.com Inc Retail - Consumer Discretionary
American Express Credit Account Credit Card ABS
Bank of America Auto Trust Automobile ABS
Bank of America Co Diversified Banks
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co Pharmaceuticals
Carmax Auto Owner Trust Automobile ABS
Chase Issuance Trust Credit Card ABS
Citigroup Inc Banks
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A.Banks
Deere & Company Machinery Manufacturing
FHLB Government Agencies
FHLMC Government Agencies
Fifth Third Auto Trust Automobile ABS
FNMA Government Agencies
Home Depot Inc Retail - Consumer Discretionary
Honda Auto Receivables Automobile ABS
Intel Corporation Semiconductors
Issuer Sector (BICS)
JP Morgan Chase & Co Diversified Banks
Kubota Credit Owner Trust Other ABS
Los Angeles Community College District Education
Mastercard Inc Consumer Finance
Microsoft Corp Software & Services
New Jersey Turnpike Authority Transportation
Novartis Capital Corp Pharmaceuticals
Paccar Financial Corp Transportation & Logistics
Pfizer Inc Pharmaceuticals
PNC Financial Services Group Banks
State of California General Government
State of Maryland General Government
Target Corp Mass Merchants
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Financial Services
Toronto-Dominion Bank Banks
Toyota Motor Corp Automobile ABS
U.S. Treasury Sovereigns
Wal-Mart Stores Inc Mass Merchants
Source: Bloomberg. BICs is an industry classification system developed and utilized by Bloomberg that classifies securities b ased on
business, economic function, and other characteristics.
Distribution List
City Council
Erica A. Stewart
Mayor
Jan Marx
Vice mayor
Emily Francis
Council Member
Andy Pease
Council Member
Michelle Shoresman
Council Member
Investment Oversight
Committee
Erica A. Stewart
Mayor
Anni Wang
Public Member
Derek Johnson
City Manager
Emily Jackson
Director of Finance
Debbie Malicoat
Accounting Manager/Controller
Natalie Harnett
Principal Financial Analyst—Budget
Independent Auditor
Badawi & Associates
PFM Asset
Management LLC
Monique Spyke
Managing Director
Appendix
•Additional ESG Information
•ESG Themes Information
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Federal Agency & MBS
Certificates of Deposit
Corporate Notes
ABS
ESG Risk Rating
ESG Risk Rating Range and Average by Sector
Source: Sustainalytics. Data as of September 30, 2023. Bars represent the range of held issuers’ ESG risk rating that fall u nder each
sector, and lines indicate the sectors market value-weighted average ESG risk rating. Please see important disclosures at the en d of this
presentation.
Sector Analysis
23.3
21.9
15.0
16.8
ESG Themes Glossary
ESG Theme Theme Description Key Indicators
Environment
Carbon Output &
Energy Use
Refers to a company’s management of risks
related to its energy efficiency and
greenhouse gas emissions in its operation
as well as its products and services in the
production phase and during the product
use phase
•Carbon intensity
•Renewable energy use
•Env. Mgt. System certification
•GHG reporting / risk management
•Hazardous products
•Sustainable products & services
Waste & Pollution
Evaluates the management of emissions
and releases from a company’s own
operations to air, water, and land, excluding
greenhouse gas emissions
•Emergency response program
•Solid waste management
•Effluent management
•Radioactive waste management
•Hazardous waste management
•Non-GHG air emissions programs
•Oil spill disclosure & performance
•Recycled material use
Resource Use &
Biodiversity
Analyzes how efficiently and effectively a
company uses its raw material inputs and
water in production. It also encompasses
how a company manages the impact of its
operations on land, ecosystems, and wildlife
•Biodiversity programs
•Deforestation programs / polices
•Site closure & rehabilitation
•Water intensity & risk management
•Forest certifications
•Supplier environmental programs / certifications
•Sustainable agriculture programs
Community
Impact
(Environmental)
Evaluates the community impact from an
environmental risk perspective based on an
assessment of Community Relations,
Products & Services, Occupational Health
and Safety, and Product Governance
•Env Impact – Community Relations
•Env Impact – Products & Services
•Env Impact – Occupational Health and Safety
•Env Impact – Product Governance
ESG Theme Theme Description Key Indicators
Social
Human Capital
Management
Evaluates the management of risks
related to human rights, labor rights,
equality, talent development,
employee retention, and labor health
and safety
•Discrimination policy
•Diversity programs
•Gender pay equality / disclosures
•Employee development
•Supply chain management / standards
•Human rights policies & programs
•Employee health & safety
Product
Governance
Focuses on the management of
risks related to product quality,
safety, wellness, and nutrition, as
well as customer data privacy &
cybersecurity
•Product & service safety programs /
c certifications
•Data privacy management
•Media & advertising ethics policy
•Organic products / GMO policy
•Product health statement
Community
Impact (Social)
Assesses how companies engage
with local communities and their
management of access to essential
products or services to
disadvantaged communities or
groups
•Equitable pricing and availability
•Access to health care
•Price transparency
•Human rights / indigenous policy
•Community involvement programs
•Noise management
ESG Financial Integration
& Resilience
Analyzes financial stability and
issues that pose systemic risks and
potential external costs to society in
the financial services industry. Also
measures ESG activities by financial
institutions
•Systemic risk management / reporting
•Tier 1 capital
•Leverage ratio
•Responsible investment / asset management
•Underwriting standards
•Financial inclusion
•Credit & loan standards
•Green buildings investments
ESG Themes Glossary
ESG Themes Glossary
ESG Theme Theme Description Key Indicators
Governance Corporate
Governance
Evaluates a company’s rules, policies, and
practices with a focus on how a company's
board of directors manages and oversees
the operations of a company. Also assesses
the management of general professional
ethics and lobbying activities
•Board / management quality & integrity
•Board structure
•Ownership & shareholder rights
•Remuneration
•Audit & financial reporting
•Stakeholder governance
•Bribery & corruption policies / programs
•Money laundering policy
•Whistleblower programs
•Business ethics programs
•Political involvement policy
•Lobbying and political expenses
Disclosures
This material is based on information obtained from sources generally believed to be reliable and available to the public, however
PFM Asset Management LLC cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness or suitability. This material is for general informatio n
purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation. All statements as to what will or may
happen under certain circumstances are based on assumptions, some but not all of which are noted in the presentation.
Assumptions may or may not be proven correct as actual events occur, and results may depend on events outside of your or our
control. Changes in assumptions may have a material effect on results. Past performance does not necessarily reflect and is not
a guaranty of future results. The information contained in this presentation is not an offer to purchase or sell any securit ies.
There is no guarantee the investment objectives will be achieved as the investment portfolio will only include holdings consi stent
with the applicable Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) guidelines. As a result, the universe of investments availab le
will be more limited. ESG criteria risk is the risk that because the investment portfolio ESG criteria excludes securities o f certain
issuers for nonfinancial reasons, the investment portfolio may forgo some market opportunities that would be available to
investment portfolios that do not apply ESG criteria.
PFM Asset Management LLC ("PFMAM") is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
and a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"). USBAM is a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association
("U.S. Bank"). U.S. Bank is a separate entity and subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not
guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any
securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request.
For more information regarding PFMAM's services or entities, please visit www.pfmam.com.