HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4a. 3160 Johnson Ave. (ARCH-0361-2023)
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FOUR (4) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES AND ASSOCIATED
SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (FOUR-PARCEL FLEXIBLE
LOT DESIGN SUBDIVISION). PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW .
FILE NUMBER: ARCH-0361-2023 BY: Hannah Hanh, Associate Planner
Phone Number: (805) 781-7432
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3160 Johnson Avenue Email: hhanh@slocity.org
APPLICANT: Jordan Knauer FROM: Rachel Cohen, Senior Planner
REPRESENTATIVE: Matt Cebulla of Cebulla Associates
RECOMMENDATION
Review the project in terms of its consistency with the Community Design Guidelines and
provide a recommendation to the Community Development Director.
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SETTING
Jordan Knauer (Applicant) has applied for Minor Development Review (ARCH-0631-
2023) and Tentative Parcel Map (SBDV-0632-2023) (i.e., flexible lot design subdivision)
applications to redevelop and subdivide an existing 0.57 -acre lot located at 3160 Johnson
Avenue. The project would create four (4) parcels, ranging fr om 6,092 to 6,653 square
feet in size, and each resulting parcel would be developed with a single -family residence
and associated site improvements such as access, landscaping, etc. (Figure 1 –
Proposed Tentative Parcel Map).
The project includes the construction of four (4) two-story, four-bedroom single-family
residences, ranging from 2,416 to 2,529 square feet in size, with attached accessory
dwelling units, two-car garages, and covered patios. Easements are proposed for shared
access, driveway, utilities, drainage, etc. To facilitate the project, the existing single-family
residence and any accessory structures would be demolished.
Meeting Date: 2/5/2024
Item Number: 4a
Time Estimate: 45 minutes
Page 9 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
Figure 1 – Proposed Tentative Parcel Map (Flexible Lot Design Subdivision)
General Location:
The project would redevelop and subdivide an existing lot located at 3160 Johnson
Avenue and be constructed on four (4) new parcels near the intersection of Johnson
Avenue and Laurel Lane (Figure 2 – Project Site).
Page 10 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
General Plan Land Use Designation:
Low-Density Residential (LDR)
Zoning Designation:
Low-Density Residential (R-1)
Surrounding Zoning Designations and Uses:
North: R-1 zone; single-family residences
East: R-1 zone; single-family residences
South: R-1 zone; single-family residences and religious assembly facility
West: R-1 zone; single-family residences
2.0 PROPOSED DESIGN
Architecture: Two (2) mirrored plan variations of farmhouse and contemporary two-story
residences are proposed.
Design and Material Details: The proposed residences include gable or hip roofs, hardie
board and bat siding, shingle roofing, double-hung and casement windows with trim, and
covered patios (Figures 3 to 6 – Proposed Elevations for Plans A and B).
Colors: Neutral color palettes consisting of grays, whites, and beiges are proposed.
Figure 2 – Project Site
Page 11 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
Figure 3 – Proposed Elevations for Plan A, Parcel 1
Figure 4 – Proposed Elevations for Plan A, Parcel 2
Page 12 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
Figure 5 – Proposed Elevations for Plan B, Parcel 3
Figure 6 – Proposed Elevations for Plan B, Parcel 4
Page 13 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
3.0 FOCUS OF REVIEW
Per Section 16.17.030(A)(5) (Flexible Lot Design Subdivisions in the R-1 Zone – Review
Authority), flexible lot projects require review as described in Section 17.106.030(C)
(Levels of Development Review – Moderate). Therefore, the Architectural Review
Commission’s (ARC) role is to (a) evaluate the project for consistency with applicable
design principles and objectives in the Community Design Guidelines (CDG), and (b)
provide a recommendation regarding the building and site designs to the Community
Development Director who will make the final determination on the project.
The accompanying Tentative Parcel Map (SBDV-0632-2023) application for the proposed
flexible lot subdivision is also tentatively scheduled for separate review by an
Administrative Hearing Officer at a Minor Subdivision Hearing on February 12, 2024.
4.0 DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES / DISCUSSION ITEMS
Staff has evaluated the project against relevant standards and guidelines in Chapter 2
(General Design Principles), Chapter 5 (Residential Project Design), and Chapter 6 (Site
Planning and Other Design Details) of the CDG, and identified the discussion items
related to its consistency with applicable guidance in Table 1 below:
Figure 7 – Proposed Site Plan / Landscape Plan
Page 14 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
Table 1 – Project Consistency with Applicable Design Guidelines in the CDG
CDG Sections 2.2 Building Design, 5.5 Single-Family Housing Design
Highlighted
Guidelines Brief Description of Guidelines Discussion
2.2(C)
5.5(A)(1)
Attention to detailing and emphasis on
vertical and horizontal articulation are
encouraged to visually reduce building
mass.
Houses in new subdivisions should
incorporate a variety of detailing, size,
and massing.
The project includes gable or hip roofs,
windows with trim, and covered
porches and patios as design
elements.
The ARC should discuss whether there
is sufficient detailing and vertical and
horizontal articulation to visually
reduce building mass for the proposed
residences.
CDG Section 5.2 Subdivision Design and General Residential Project Principles
Highlighted
Guideline Brief Description of Guideline Discussion
5.2(F)
Exterior finish materials should be
durable and require low maintenance.
The use of combined materials can
provide visual interest and texture;
however, all sides of the single-family
residence should employ the same
materials, design details, and window
treatment.
The project primarily utilizes hardie
board and bat siding and double-hung
and casement windows as exterior
finish materials.
The ARC should discuss whether the
proposed combination of materials
provide sufficient visual interest and
texture on all elevations for the
residences.
CDG Section 6.1 Miscellaneous Design Details
Highlighted
Guideline Brief Description of Guideline Discussion
6.1(B)
Fences and walls can provide safety,
security, screening, and privacy, but
can also be unsightly because of their
length and visibility unless well
designed:
- Design and placement should
relate well to building architecture
and topography. The elements
should be the same quality in
design and materials as the
buildings.
- Tall retaining walls (i.e., five feet or
higher) should be divided up into
two (2) or more shorter walls, with
the upper portion of the wall set
back from the lower wall at least
two (2) feet.
The project utilizes a wood fence and
retaining wall combination that varies
in height (maximum of eight [8] feet)
along the site perimeter due to
changes in topography. The project
includes wood fencing to separate
private areas for the proposed
residences and a five-foot high
retaining wall along the east property
line.
The ARC should discuss whether
wood fencing complements the design
and materials of the residences and
whether the five-foot (5’) high portion of
the retaining wall should be divided
into two (2) shorter walls.
Page 15 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
5.0 PROJECT STATISTICS
Staff has evaluated the project against relevant development standards of the Zoning
Regulations and summarized its compliance in Table 2 below. No exceptions from
development standards are requested as part of this application.
Table 2 – Project Compliance with Development Standards in the Zoning Regulations
R-1 Development Standards Allowance or Requirement Compliant
Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.4 Yes
Minimum Front Setback 20 feet Yes
Minimum Side Setback
5 feet for the first 12 feet in height;
incrementally increases to 11 feet at a
maximum building height of 25 feet1
Yes
Minimum Rear Setback
5 feet for the first 12 feet in height;
incrementally increases to 11 feet at a
maximum building height of 25 feet1
Yes
Maximum Building Height 25 feet Yes
Maximum Lot Coverage 40% Yes
Minimum Lot Area 6,000 square feet Yes
Minimum Number of Parking
Spaces
2 spaces for the first four (4) bedrooms
(includes offices) Yes
Maximum Fence Height 9 feet for combined fence and retaining wall
height as measured from the lower side Yes
Tree Removals
Removal of two (2) eucalyptus and palm trees; City Arborist
recommends approval of the removal and compensatory
plantings, as shown in the landscape plan (Sheet L-1 of
Project Plans), to the Community Development Director
Environmental Determination Categorically exempt from environmental review under Section
15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines.
6.0 ACTION CHOICES
6.1 Recommend approval of the project based on consistency with the CDG. An action
recommending approval of the project will be forwarded to the Community
Development Director for final action. This action may include direction for the
applicant or recommendations for conditions of approval to address consistency
with the CDG.
6.2 Continue the project to a hearing date certain or uncertain. An action continuing
the project should include direction to the applicant and staff on pertinent issues.
1 Refer to minimum required setback plane lines shown on the proposed elevations (Figures 3 through 6).
Page 16 of 36
Item 4a
ARCH-0361-2023
Architectural Review Commission Report – February 5, 2024
6.3 Recommend denial of the project. An action recommending denial of the project
should include findings that cite the basis for denial and reference inconsistency
with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, CDG, or other policy documents.
7.0 ATTACHMENTS
A – ARCH-0361-2023 Project Plans
Page 17 of 36
Page 18 of 36
Page 19 of 36
Page 20 of 36
Page 21 of 36
Page 22 of 36
Page 23 of 36
Page 24 of 36
Page 25 of 36
Page 26 of 36
1
(
6
(
1
(
/
5
ǻ
PARCELS A & B
14 PM 27
0$7 7 +(::35,
(
6
6
&,9 ,/
Mobile:
NORT
H
LQFK IW
GRAPHIC SCALE
UTILITY PLAN
JO
H
N
S
O
N
A
V
E
CONSTRUCTIONS NOTES:
5(029( &$3(;,67,1*:$7(56(59,&(&211(&7,21
&216758&708/7,3/(:$7(56(59,&(0$1,)2/'3(56/2&,7<67'
5(029((;,67,1*6(:(5/$7(5$/
&216758&76(:(5/$7(5$/3(56/2&,7<67'
&216758&76(:(5&/($12873(56/2&,7<67'
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
PARCEL 4
Page 27 of 36
1
(
6
(
1
(
/
5
ǻ
PARCELS A & B
14 PM 27
0$7 7 +(::35,
(
6
6
&,9 ,/
Mobile:
NORT
H
LQFK IW
GRAPHIC SCALE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
JO
H
N
S
O
N
A
V
E
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
PARCEL 4
DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
SUITABLE APPLICATIONS
LIMITATIONS
IMPLEMENTATION
x
x
x
x
x
675((76:((3,1*$1'9$&880,1*
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
&21&5(7(:$6+287$5($
&216758&7,21(175$1&(
Page 28 of 36
Page 29 of 36
Page 30 of 36
ULJKWVLGHHOHYDWLRQZHVW
EDFNHOHYDWLRQVRXWK
!
"
#$
%$$#
!$&'(() !"#$
*"+ )&$!%,)!)-.//0
*%120345)//364378
*1 1)& 9)/:
;$<"" =>
? &)@
A#$>
*; ?$!#>
B=$;
CCC1DEFGHHIIJJKDLIMEJ1DKN
::778
77)O)73)O)::
4:7..3
$
;
"=; P("!P $#
#
!6.//4
(
(
'&!$$(;%!#
!
$
#"%!;A$=$!"(
IURQWHOHYDWLRQQRUWK
OHIWVLGHHOHYDWLRQHDVW
6&$/(
SODWHOLQH
IORRUOLQH
IORRUOLQH
SODWHOLQH
DVSKDOWVKLQJOHV
FRPSRVLWHVLGLQJ
DGKHUHGEULFNIDFH
ZRRGHQWU\GRRU
!"#$%&
'()(&)%(
(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/
6
6,',1*+$5',(%2$5'$1'%$76,',1*
522),1*$63+$/76+,1*/(
75,0;&251(575,0;
:,1'2:$1''22575,0
%5,&.9(1((5
5,'*((/(9$7,21
)/225(/(9
0(7$/52//83'225
*+,-*,
./*
01*2-*,
3)45
6#7 89:!"
3 77 #
96
345
3!7 $
$9(5$*(1$785$/*5$'(
3523(57<
/,1(
(;,67(/(9
(;,67*5$'(
3/$1$3$5&(/
3523(57</,1(
6KHUZLQZLOOLDPV
WULPFRORU
6KHUZLQZLOOLDPV
VLGLQJFRORU
!
"#
$
"
%
#
&
'
(
)
*
+
%
35
2
3
(
5
7
<
/
,
1
(
6(
7
%
$
&
.
3
/
$
1
(
/
,
1
(
,%
&
-
.
/
0
(
"
)
.
+
%
(
)
*
+
%
!
0"#
$
"
%
#
&
'
(
)
*
+
%
//
,%
&
-
.
/
0
(
"
)
.
+
%
(
)
*
+
%
1
Page 31 of 36
ULJKWVLGHHOHYDWLRQHDVW
EDFNHOHYDWLRQVRXWK
!
"
#$
%$$#
!$&'(() !"#$
*"+ )&$!%,)!)-.//0
*%120345)//364378
*1 1)& 9)/:
;$<"" =>
? &)@
A#$>
*; ?$!#>
B=$;
CCC1DEFGHHIIJJKDLIMEJ1DKN
::778
77)O)73)O)::
4:7..3
$
;
"=; P("!P $#
#
!6.//4
(
(
'&!$$(;%!#
!
$
#"%!;A$=$!"(
IURQWHOHYDWLRQQRUWK
OHIWVLGHHOHYDWLRQZHVW
6&$/(
SODWHOLQH
IORRUOLQH
IORRUOLQH
SODWHOLQH
DVSKDOWVKLQJOHV
FRPSRVLWHVLGLQJ
ZRRGHQWU\GRRU
!"#$%&
'()(&)%(
(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/
6
6,',1*+$5',(%2$5'$1'%$76,',1*
522),1*$63+$/76+,1*/(
75,0;&251(575,0;
:,1'2:$1''22575,0
5,'*((/(9$7,21
)/225(/(9
0(7$/52//83'225
*+,-*,
./*
01*2-*,
3)45
6#7 89:!"
3 77 #
96
345
3!7 $
$9(5$*(1$785$/*5$'(
3523(57<
/,1(
(;,67(/(9
(;,67*5$'(
3/$1$3$5&(/
3523(57</,1(
6KHUZLQZLOOLDPV
WULPFRORUDQG
VLGLQJ
!
"#
$
%&
'!
(!
"
)
*
+
,
$
%*
'
!
$
%&
'!
-./0.
!
"#
$
%&
'!
(!
"
)
*
+
,
$
%*
'
!
$
%&
'!
-./0.
!
"#
$
%&
'!
(!
"
)
*
+
,
$
%*
'
!
$
%&
'!
/1.23
Page 32 of 36
Page 33 of 36
Page 34 of 36
ULJKWVLGHHOHYDWLRQZHVWEDFNHOHYDWLRQVRXWK
!
"
#$
%$$#
!$&'(() !"#$
*"+ )&$!%,)!)-.//0
*%120345)//364378
*1 1)& 9)/:
;$<"" =>
? &)@
A#$>
*; ?$!#>
B=$;
CCC1DEFGHHIIJJKDLIMEJ1DKN
:.73.
3O)P)73)P):.
4:7..3
$
;
"=; Q("!Q $#
#
!6.//4
(
(
'&!$$(;%!#
!
$
#"%!;A$=$!"(
IURQWHOHYDWLRQQRUWK
OHIWVLGHHOHYDWLRQHDVW
!"#$%&
'()(&)%(
6&$/(
(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/
6
6,',1*+$5',(/$36,',1*
522),1*$63+$/76+,1*/(
75,0;&251(575,0;
:,1'2:$1''22575,0
*+,-*,
./*
01*2-*,
3)45
6#7 89:!"
3 77 #
96
345
3!7 $
[)$&,$
;9(17
3/$1%3$5&(/
3523(57</,1(
$9(5$*(1$785$/*5$'(
(;,67,1**5$'(
SODWHOLQH
IORRUOLQH
5,'*((/(9+(,*+(6732,17
(*
6KHUZLQZLOOLDPV
VLGLQJFRORU
6KHUZLQZLOOLDPV
WULPFRORU
!" !!
#$
%
#
&
$
'
(
)
*
+
,&
35
2
3
(
5
7
<
/
,
1
(
6(
7
%
$
&
.
3
/
$
1
(
/
,
1
(
!
-&
'
.
/
0
1
)
#
*
/
,
&
)
*
+
,&
35
2
3
(
5
7
<
/
,
1
(
6(
7
%
$
&
.
3
/
$
1
(
/
,
1
(
!" !!
#$
%
#
&
$
'
(
)
*
+
,&
!
-&
'
.
/
0
1
)
#
*
/
,
&
)
*
+
,&
$9(5$*(1$785$/*5$'(
)/225(/(9
SODWHOLQH
IORRUOLQH
H[LVWLQJJUDGH
UHWDLQLQJZDOO
Page 35 of 36
ULJKWVLGHHOHYDWLRQZHVW
EDFNHOHYDWLRQVRXWK
!
"
#$
%$$#
!$&'(() !"#$
*"+ )&$!%,)!)-.//0
*%120345)//364378
*1 1)& 9)/:
;$<"" =>
? &)@
A#$>
*; ?$!#>
B=$;
CCC1DEFGHHIIJJKDLIMEJ1DKN
:.73.
3O)P)73)P):.
4:7..3
$
;
"=; Q("!Q $#
#
!6.//4
(
(
'&!$$(;%!#
!
$
#"%!;A$=$!"(
IURQWHOHYDWLRQQRUWK
OHIWVLGHHOHYDWLRQHDVW
!"#$%&
'()(&)%(
6&$/(
SODWHOLQH
(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/
6
6,',1*+$5',(/$36,',1*
522),1*$63+$/76+,1*/(
75,0;&251(575,0;:,1'2:$1''22575,0
5,'*((/(9+(,*+(6732,17
)/225(/(9
*+,-*,
./*
01*2-*,
3)45
6#7 89:!"
3 77 #
96
345
3!7 $
[)$&,$
;3267
+$5',(/$36,',1*
0(7$/52//83'225
;9(17 3/$1%3$5&(/
(*
$9(5$*(1$785$/*5$'(
(;,67,1**5$'(
6KHUZLQZLOOLDPV
WULPFRORU
6KHUZLQZLOOLDPV
VLGLQJFRORU
!
! "
#$
%
#
&
$
'
(
)
*
+
,&
-&
'
.
/
0
1
)
#
*
/
,
&
)
*
+
,&
! "
#$
%
#
&
$
'
(
)
*
+
,&
35
2
3
(
5
7
<
/
,
1
(
6(
7
%
$
&
.
3
/
$
1
(
/
,
1
(
35
2
3
(
5
7
<
/
,
1
(
6(
7
%
$
&
.
3
/
$
1
(
/
,
1
(
2
-&
'
.
/
0
1
)
#
*
/
,
&
)
*
+
,&
Page 36 of 36
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
1
ARCH-0361-2023
3160 Johnson Avenue
Review of single-family residences and associated site improvements for
four (4) future lots of a flexible lot design subdivision
February 5, 2024
Applicant: Jordan Knauer
Project Description
Subdivision and redevelopment of existing 0.57-acre parcel
Four-parcel flexible lot design subdivision
Separate concurrent review by Community Development
Director
Alternative to conventional subdivision design
Future lots to accommodate single-family development
Single-family residence
Site improvements – shared access, landscaping, fencing, etc.
1
2
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
2
Project Site – 3160 Johnson Avenue
Proposed Parcels
3
4
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
3
Plan A – Parcels 1 and 2
Plan B – Parcels 3 and 4
5
6
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
4
Discussion Items
Discussion Item – Building Mass and Detailing
Design Guidelines
Detailing and emphasis on vertical and horizontal articulation to
visually reduce building mass
New subdivisions to incorporate a variety of detailing, size, and
massing
Project Elements
Gable or hip roofs
Windows with trim
Covered porches and patios
ARC should discuss whether there is sufficient detailing and
articulation to visually reduce building mass
7
8
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
5
Discussion Item – Building Finishes
Design Guidelines
Exterior finish materials to be durable and low maintenance
Use of materials to provide visual interest and texture
consistently on all building elevations
Project Elements
Hardie board and bat siding
Double-hung and casement windows
ARC should discuss whether combination of materials
provide sufficient visual interest and texture on all building
elevations
Discussion Item – Fencing and Wall Design
Design Guidelines
Design and placement of fencing and walls to relate well with building
architecture and topography
Tall retaining walls (i.e., five-foot or higher) should be divided into
shorter walls
Project Elements
Combination of wood fence and retaining block wall along site
perimeter
Wood fence to separate private areas between residences
Five-foot high portion of retaining wall at rear of site (along east
property line)
ARC should discuss whether wood fencing complements the
residences, and whether the five-foot high portion of the retaining
wall should be divided into shorter walls
9
10
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
6
Recommendation
Review the project in terms of consistency with the
Community Design Guidelines and provide a
recommendation to the Community Development Director
regarding the building and site designs
11
12
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
7
13
14
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
8
15
16
2/5/2024 Item 4a Staff Presentation
9
17
Applicant Presentation 02/05/2024 Item 4a
Applicant Presentation 02/05/2024 Item 4a
Applicant Presentation 02/05/2024 Item 4a
Applicant Presentation 02/05/2024 Item 4a