Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8a. Study Session on Housing Needs and Opportunities Item 8a Department: Community Development Cost Center: 4008 For Agenda of: 3/5/2023 Placement: Study Session Estimated Time: 90 minutes FROM: Timmi Tway, Community Development Director Prepared By: Teresa McClish, Housing Policy and Programs Manager Daisy Wiberg, Homelessness Response Manager SUBJECT: HOUSING NEEDS AND OPPORTUNITIES STUDY SESSION RECOMMENDATION Receive a presentation and conduct a study session on current status of the City’s housing continuum, including options to increase and diversify housing supply in the City. REPORT-IN-BRIEF The purpose of this study session is to provide the City Council and the community with an overview of the existing housing landscape in the City and summarize housing needs, constraints, and opportunities. The discussion in the report is organized around the idea of a “housing continuum,” as it is important to realize a variety of housing types in the community. In addition to background information, the report identifies constraints and various opportunities to encourage certain types of housing. Some of the opportunities are being addressed in existing work plan items, and others could be integrated into future work plans at the Council’s direction. POLICY CONTEXT The 2023-2025 Financial Plan Major City Goal for Housing and Homelessness is to: Support the expansion of housing options for all, and continue to facilitate the production of housing, including the necessary supporting infrastructure, with an emphasis on affordable and workforce housing as well as accessibly connected development. Collaborate with local non-profit partners, non- governmental agencies, the county, the state, and federal governments to advocate for increased funding and implementation of comprehensive and effective strategies to prevent and reduce homelessness. Included in goal implementation strategies is an action item to “Conduct a Study Session with the City Council to identify needs and opportunities across the housing spectrum, including various types of transitional and supportive housing options.” Page 73 of 116 Item 8a This study session is part of the ongoing implementation of the Major City Goal work plan to implement the City’s 6th Cyle General Plan Housing Element, with policies and programs that relate to increasing housing production and diversified supply shown in Attachment A that are designed to work in concert to accomplish the vision for housing in our community. DISCUSSION Background Policy Background The state of California has some of the most expensive home prices and rents in the nation and the scale of the state’s homelessness crisis is larger than any other state and worsened during the Covid-19 pandemic1. The intertwined housing and homelessness crises have galvanized the state to pass a series of landmark legislation starting in 2017 to reduce barriers to housing production and increase local government accountability. This has created the need and opportunity for local policy to be reshaped to align with state legislative mandates, including policies to address the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), or fair share housing needs assigned to each jurisdiction. The City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element provides City policy, goals, and implementation programs to address the City’s RHNA, housing supply, fair housing, housing affordability, special needs housing and homeless response over an eight -year cycle. Additionally, the inclusion of housing and homelessness response as a Major City Goal over the past several financial cycles provide prioritization of City resources to address these crises. Increasing opportunities for production of a variety of housing types combined with smart growth principals as adopted in the City’s General Plan also align with Major City Goals for Economic Resiliency, Cultural Vitality and Fiscal Sustainability by promoting a healthy ratio of jobs and housing; Diversity, Equity and Inclusion by promoting accessible shelter and housing; and Climate Action, Open Space and Sustainable Transportation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. City’s Role in Housing The City is a municipality that does not construct housing and does not receive funds for homelessness response; however, as a regulator, the City can remove some barriers to the provision of housing and plan for more housing in the community. This can be do ne through policy changes, programs, and the creation of new infrastructure to support housing and the new population that results from housing. In addition, the City can, and does, collaborate with regional partners to diversity housing supply and c onnect the unhoused with shelter and housing. 1 https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/blog/five-recent-trends-california-homelessness/ Page 74 of 116 Item 8a Through policies, the City can encourage certain housing types over others. Policy changes can impact regulations (such as zoning regulations) or processes (such as the process to seek approval for a new building). The City can also make policy decisions about what type of housing or programs it will fund through its Affordable Housing Fund, which has provided funding support for several important affordable housing projects that total more than 600 new units. Also through housing policy, the City can also co-solve for increasing needs for community resiliency due to climate change and require housing development to facilitate walkable and livable communities. For example, the City’s Flexible Density Program allows unlimited density for downtown units smaller than 600 sq. ft., to incentivise residential use near transit and jobs, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. Population and Housing in San Luis Obispo The City’s Housing Element and the United States Census2 provide information about the population and housing stock that exists in the City. This is important information to consider, as it can illustrate the unique housing needs of the community, which can inform policy and funding decisions. Several key population related statistics that should be considered are:  SLO is home to 47,063 people according to the 2020 census.  The average family size in SLO is 2.74 and in the State as a whole, it is 3.39.  The median household income in the City is $65,000; however, this number varies greatly depending on the type of household. For example, for married -couple families, the median income is $140,000, and for “nonfamily” households3, it is $41,065.  According to the US Census 2022 American Community Survey, 31.5% of residents in San Luis Obispo are experiencing poverty, as opposed to 12.2% of all people in California. This is likely due to the significant student population, which can impact income statistics.  The population pyramid figure below illustrates the age breakdown of the City’s population, which shows a significant number of 20 to 24 year olds (due to students residing in the City). 2 https://data.census.gov/profile/San_Luis_Obispo_city,_California?g=160XX00US0668154 ; https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2022.S2504?q=housing%20stock%20san%20luis%20obispo%20 city&g=160XX00US0668154 3 Defined as hhouseholds with one or more non-relatives, and not including living alone (Housing Element Appendix B – Section j). Page 75 of 116 Item 8a Figure 1 City population by age and gender Key housing related statistics in the City include:  There are approximately 21,562 housing units in San Luis Obispo (as of 2020).  Of the occupied units in the City, 7.3% are studios, 13.4% are one bedroom, 62.2% are 2 or 3 bedrooms, and 17.1% are 4 or more bedrooms.  According to the 2020 Housing Element, 40% of the housing units in the City are multifamily structures, 53% are single family homes, and 7% are mobile home units.  During the last housing element cycle (2014-2019), 1,548 units were constructed. During the first half of the current eight-year RHNA cycle (2020-2028) at total of 2,047 units have been constructed.  SLO has a homeownership rate of 38%. California, as a whole, has a homeownership rate of 55.8%.  In the City of SLO, approximately 62% of all residentially zoned land (1,714 acres) is dedicated to single-unit zoning4, and between 2015 – 2020 approximately 50% of all new housing constructed in the City were single-unit homes. 4 As of June 2023, the allocation of residentially zoned properties in City of SLO was: R-1 (7 units/net acre)= 1,714.42 acres (62%); R-2 (12 units/net acre)= 631.42 acres (23%); R-3 (20 units/net acre)= 213.16 acres (8%); R-4 (24 units/net acre) = 220.51 acres (8%); Total = 2,779.52 acres Page 76 of 116 Item 8a  The County of SLO is the second least affordable small metro area in the entire nation. The cost of housing in the County is about 51.7% higher than the national average, ranking it as a small metro area with the fourth highest housing cost in the United States. As of February 2022, rent averaged at $2,347 per month – $719 more than the national average. The median rental household spends 38% of its income on housing, meaning that over half of all rental households in the County are at increased risk of homelessness due to the burden that housing costs place on family budgets5. The City's 6th Cycle Housing Element contains an extensive analysis of other pertinent housing and population statistics and trends. Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Importantly, the contents of the Housing Element are informed by the City’s RHNA. The City’s RHNA number is the number of units that the City must plan to accommodate during the Housing Element Cycle (in this case, the 6 th cycle, which spans 2020-2028). The RHNA is broken down into affordability categories, which means the City must plan to accommodate, and show progress in accommodating, housing units that are at multiple affordability levels. The City’s RHNA requirement (3,354 total units) as well as the number of units permitted through 2023 (2,555) is shown in the summary table below. Greater details for RHNA progress will be provided in the 2023 General Plan Annual Report scheduled for City Council consideration in April. Table 2 Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress Income Level  (% of County Median Income) 6th Cycle RHNA Allocation  Building Permitted Units Issued by Affordability  Total Units Permitted by Income Level Total Units Remaining by Income Level Year 1 – 2020 Year 2 – 2021 Year 3 – 2022 Year 4 – 2023 Extremely Low  24.5% 825  0  14  36  0  50  683  Very Low  14  42  14 22  92  Low  15.5% 520  36  82  71  5  194  326  Moderate  18% 603  13  9  2  47  71  532  Above Moderate  42% 1,406  939  472  439  298  2,148  0    Total Units     3,354  1,002  619  562  415  2,555                   Total Remaining for RHNA Period: 1,615  5 SLO Countywide Plan to Address Homelessness Page 77 of 116 Item 8a The City has made significant progress toward meeting its RHNA mandate , meeting 54% of the total RHNA halfway through the eight-year cycle. However, while the City has issued permits for 742 Above Moderate dwelling units in excess of its requirement for this income category, more progress is needed in below-moderate income categories: the City is meeting approximately 12% for the Moderate-Income category, 37% for the Low- Income category, and 17% of the Very-Low and Extremely-Low Income categories. Housing Continuum While land use policies and zoning regulations historically have focused on market rate housing in typical formats such as single-family detached, single family attached, and multi-family rental housing, in reality, housing needs are more diversified. Policies and programs that identify and describe how housing needs can be met lend to an expanded continuum of housing shown below in Figure 2. This expanded continuum can help meet the needs of key beneficiary groups, including those who are experiencing homelessness, those with special needs, families, seniors, students, and the city’s workforce. Figure 2 Housing Continuum As illustrated in the graphic above, the housing continuum includes:  Homeless: While not necessarily a housing type, this portion of the continuum represents those in the community who are currently experiencing homelessness.  Emergency shelters: Emergency shelters are housing with minimal supportive services for people experiencing homelessness.  Transitional housing: Transitional housing is a type of supportive housing used to facilitate the movement of people experiencing homelessness into permanent housing.  Permanent supportive housing: Permanent supportive housing consists of permanent housing in which housing assistance (e.g., long-term leasing or rental assistance) and supportive services are provided to assist households with at least one member (adult or child) with a disability in achieving housing stability.  Below market rate housing (BMR): below market rate housing is housing that is deed restricted to be affordable to households t hat meet certain income limits. Generally, this type of housing is provided at low, very low -, or moderate-income levels. These income levels are set by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (California HCD), and are based on county and household size; and the City publishes these Below Market Rate Income Levels yearly on the City’s website. Page 78 of 116 Item 8a  Market rental housing: market rental housing refers to rental housing that is rented at market rates (not deed restricted regardless of price).  Market home ownership: market rate home ownership refers to housing that is sold at market rates (not deed restricted regardless of price). Housing needs analyses benefit from consideration of housing capacity that reduces the number of the unhoused and houses a planned population by accommodating:  new housing supply,  diverse housing types,  residents’ ability to move through the housing continuum and secure housing to meet specific needs, and  housing stock that is affordable for people and the cost of which does not exceed 30% of their income. Goal of Study Session This intent of this study session is to:  Provide the City Council with an overview of housing in San Luis Obispo using the concept of a “continuum of housing” for all community members.  Provide the City Council with an opportunity to discuss housing needs and opportunities.  Provide the City Council with an opportunity to provide staff with feedback and direction as to whether there are opportunities that staff should further explore as the City seeks to encourage the provision of a diverse housing stock for all community members. This report is organized using this concept of a housing continuum. In the remainder of the report, information about needs, constraints, and opportunities for the various housing types in the continuum is provided to guide City Council discussion. Market Rate Rental and Home Ownership Housing In general, it is easier for developers to build market rate housing than other housing types in the continuum due to the fact that sale or rent prices can be set by the developer/owner and reflective of market dynamics and thus are not price or deed restricted. Market rate housing can take many forms including: single family detached housing, duplex/triplexes, townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). New market rate housing can be provided in new larger developments, on existing single-family lots (utilizing SB9 lot split or ADU regulations), as well as on infill parcels or as part of mixed-use projects. Page 79 of 116 Item 8a Need for Market Rate Housing in SLO According to the RHNA allocation, the City of SLO should encourage the construction o f 1,406 market rate housing units in the City by 2028. The City has already exceeded its market rate housing unit target for this RHNA cycle with the approval of 2,148 market rate units. There are an additional 478 units currently in the construction pipeline (please see major development project pipeline in Attachment B). Market rate housing production is needed to provide supply of rental apartments, townhomes, condominiums, ADU’s and detached single family homes to help meet the needs of residents moving through the housing continuum. Constraints While market rate housing can be easier to encourage than other types of housing, there are constraints that impact the provision of such housing in the City. Som e constraints cannot be directly addressed by the City (e.g. cost of construction, cost of land, interest rates), while others can be impacted by City policy (e.g. zoning regulations, process for project approval). Housing constraints are discussed at len gth in the 6th Cyle Housing Element and include:  Cost and availability of land. Land is becoming increasingly more expensive, and the cost of land is a significant constraint on the production of housing and can impact the ability of a developer to make a project financially viable. The City generally does not have the ability to impact this factor, however, implementing process improvements that streamline housing project review can help, as this can reduce holding costs for property owners during the entitlement and permitting process.  Cost and availability of financing. Changes in the cost and availability of financing also impact the provision of housing units. The City generally does not have the ability to impact this factor, except for participation in down payment assistance programs6, limited instances of infrastructure finance programs such as the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP)7 and other tax increment financing generally available for below market rate housing.  Cost of construction. Construction costs have risen significantly (up to 80%8) in the past several years and these costs, coupled with rising costs of insurance, developer fees, and labor, can greatly impact the financial viability of housing projects. 6 The City currently offers a program for affordable housing only through the State BEGIN program described more under the BMR Housing Section. The City also participates in a Down Payment Assistance Program in which the developer provides $20,000 in assistance for Avila Ranch Workforce units as required through the project Development Agreement. 7 SCIP is a financing program that enables developers to pay most impact fees and finance public improvements through an acquisition agreement that qualify under the 1913/1915 Act (excluding school fees) via tax-exempt bond issuance proceeds (https://cscda.org/infrastructure-finance-programs/). The City is participating in this program for a portion of the East Airport Annexation properties. 8 Residential construction costs have gone up 80% in 10 years. Stephen Peck Planning February 2024. Page 80 of 116 Item 8a  Zoning regulations and policies. Zoning regulations can impact the ability of a developer to create housing. For example, requiring parking can impact the ability of a developer to provide housing units, because providing parking spaces costs money and requires valuable land. Height limits and setbacks are other examples of zoning regulations that restrict building area and profit margins.  Process constraints. Housing can also be constrained when the process for permitting and approval of housing units can be confusing, uncertain, or lengthy. Many cities, including SLO, have looked at process improvements and changes in order to provide more certainty to developers, shorten the length of time required to gain approval for housing units, and provide additional certainty to project pro- formas9. Opportunities to encourage the provision of market rate housing There are things that a jurisdiction can do to encourage the provision of market rate sale and rental housing in a community. This section describes what the City is doing to encourage this type of housing, as well as opportunities that the City may want to consider in the future. Existing and Upcoming City Policies and Programs 1. Density Bonus Incentives: Developers in the City may use Density Bonus Incentives that provide for additional density on a site (allowing for more market rate units), as well as other deviations from zoning standards, site development standards or parking requirements in exchange for the provision of deed restricted below market rate housing units in a project. The additional density allows for additional market rate homes. The City had previously increased incentives beyond state requirements to support housing projects and gain more BMR units; however, these efforts have largely been subsumed within the recent multi-year series of amendments by the state legislature that make it easier for an applicant to secure greater density. Due to the popularity of Density Bonus, the City is likely to see projects with higher density and reduced parking as allowed by state law as this increases housing revenue potential through the sale or rental of additional units. Nonetheless, housing costs, as described above, remain formidable and still impact the feasibility for density bonus projects. 9 A pro forma is the financial analysis a developer uses to estimate total development costs relative to projected income (e.g., the revenue from monthly rents or sales) in order to determine financial feasibility (https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/making-it-pencil-2023/) Page 81 of 116 Item 8a 2. Policies to encourage missing middle housing: “Missing Middle” housing is a range of multiunit or clustered housing types, compatible in scale with single-family homes, that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living, respond to shifting household demographics, and meet the need for more housing choices at different price points10. Missing middle housing is considered within the market rate categories of the housing continuum as this type of housing is not deed or price restricted at below market rates. The City currently has policies in place (Housing Element Policy 5.3 and Program 5.4) to address missing middle housing. A 2023 analysis prepared by ECONorthwest on affordable-by-design housing in SLO County (SLOCOG/REACH’s Affordable by Design study), concluded that market-rate developments that have rents that are affordable to households earning less than 120% of the Area Medium Income11 (AMI) are significantly limited and for-sale units in the category are unlikely to be viable12. Nonetheless, according to the ABD Study, while not considered affordable, jurisdictions can implement a variety of regulatory and planning measures to remove barriers and may support “missing middle” housing production at a more moderate price point. The City is taking a multi-pronged and expanded approach to missing middle housing to include various smaller scale housing units and in districts allowing both residential and mixed uses. The first prong is to implement state laws that directly impact infill density for small lot, multi-unit dwellings13 or Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU’s). To date, this prong primarily includes ADU laws, SB9 (Weiner) legislation that allows four-dwellings on single family lots, and state Density Bonus Law. This is important because these state laws already provide for increased densities and flexibility in development standards and promote smaller units. The second prong is to implement the Flexible Density Program. Third, as proposed further below under opportunities, an update to the City’s objective design standards for small lot and small house infill projects that can be approved ministerially, as well as pre- approved ADU plans, to further promote missing middle housing. The final prong is an update the City’s Zoning ordinance to potentially add incentives specific to missing middle housing and potentially leverage provisions of state laws (Example, SB10 [Weiner]) described further below, to increase residential density where appropriate. The City has implemented a series of zoning provisions that allows reduced fees or higher density for smaller units. 10 Parolek, D. (2020). Missing Middle Housing -Thinking Big and Building Small to Respond to Today’s Housing Crisis. Island Press. 11 https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/grants-and-funding/income-limits-2023.pdf 12 "Working with the Market: Understanding and Supporting Affordable-by-Design Housing in San Luis Obispo County" Prepared for SLOCOG, August 2023 13 Multi-Unit Dwellings. Two or more dwelling units attached or detached, not including any accessory dwelling units, on a site or lot. Types of multiple unit dwellings include a duplex, townhouses, common interest subdivisions, garden apartments, senior housing developments, and multistory apart ment buildings. Multi-unit dwellings may also be combined with nonresidential uses as part of a mixed -use development. (Ord. 1705 §§ 99, 100, 2021; Ord. 1650 § 3 (Exh. B), 2018: Ord. 1647 § 7 (Exh. D (part)), 2018) Page 82 of 116 Item 8a The following is a summary of implementation programs that incentivize missing middle units: a. Density Bonus Law implementation provide incentives for smaller units as higher densities are achieved for infill lots. b. The inclusionary housing in-lieu fee is based on square footage. As a result, smaller units have lower fees, which incentivise smaller infill development. c. The Downtown Flexible Density Program developed through the State SB2 Grant programs removes density requirements for units less than 600 s.f. downtown. d. Ministerial review and reduced fees for ADUs and JADUs; e. The City utilizes a tiered fee structure that provides substantial reductions in cost for smaller residential units for water, sewer and transportation impact fees; f. Minimum density allowances for residential districts: R-1=1 density unit; R- 2 = 2 density units; R-3 = 3 density units; R-4 = 4 density units14. g. Fractional density allowances based on unit size and number of bedrooms which allows more units (studios and 1-bedrooms less than 600 s.f. = 0.5 unit and 1-bedrooms less than 100 s.f. = .66 unit15; h. Subdivision ordinance update that allows flexible lot design for R-1 districts. i. Updated Tiny Homes on Wheels Regulations; and j. Implementation of SB 9 (California H.O.M.E Act) allowing for up to four houses on single-family lots. 3. Streamlining: The City has amended its Zoning Ordinance and permitting practices to allow more projects to be eligible for ministerial review and shorter processing time as follows: a. Established new section to exempt specific housing projects from discretionary review (17.106.020.C); b. Streamlined Discretionary Review for Housing Projects less than 49 units (17.106.030); and c. Implemented E-review processes to allow digital permit and plan submittal and review. This will improve transparency and hopefully streamline existing permitting processes. 14 https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/17.18.020; https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/17.20.010 https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/17.22.020 15 https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/17.70.040 Page 83 of 116 Item 8a 4. Mixed Use The 2021 Zoning amendments included allowance of Mixed -Use Developments in C-S and M zones by right. This has resulted in significant new area available for residential development and a total of 621 units in the C -S or M zones that are currently under building review or construction, including: Victoria Crossing (33- units); Broad Street Place (40-units); Orcutt Mixed Use (5-units); Laurel Creek (98- units); Bridge St. Apartments (94-units); Tribune Work-Live Project (43-units); 650 Tank Farm (249-units); 1030 Orcutt (15-units); and McMillan Mixed Use (44-units). 5. Objective Design Standards (ODS) Objective design standards were approved by Council in December 2021 to address projects approved in accordance with SB35 (Wiener) or otherwise qualifying projects inclusive of a certain percentage of BMR units. Additionally, the City allows for all qualifying projects that are required to be approved by -right through state law to use these objective design standards, including urban lot splits and 2-unit developments through SB9. 6. Specific Plan Amendments and other geographic opportunities One way to directly encourage the provision of new housing is to provide additional capacity through upzoning or by changing zoning to allow housing in areas where it was previously not allowed. The City has incorporated the following two specific plan updates into the 2023-25 Financial Plan Major City Goal work program for Housing & Homelessness: a. Margarita Area Specific Plan - The Margarita Area Specific Plan (MASP) was adopted in 2004 and much of the residential development potential of the plan was limited by the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport, Airport Land Use Plan. In 2021 the Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) was amended. As such, several areas of the MASP are either available for residential development (where it was not allowed before) or available for higher density residential development. Staff is preparing a Request For Proposals (RFP) for a consultant to prepare amendments to the MASP that would increase density on existing residentially zoned land and specifically include opportunities and incentives to develop “Missing Middle” Housing types as well as allowing mixed-use development on commercially zoned land. The RFP for consultant services to move this effort forward is tentatively scheduled for City Council consideration in April 2024. It is estimated to be completed in fall 2025. b. Airport Area Specific Plan – Airport Area: a. In 2020 the City amended the Zoning Regulations to allow mixed -use development by right within the Service Commercial (C-S) and Manufacturing (M) zones but did not extend this change to any of the specific plan areas. With the update and amendment to the ALUP and the recent allowance for mixed use development in the rest of the City, the City is currently moving forward with an applicant-funded application to review options for allowing mixed-use development with a Conditional Use Permit where consistent with the ALUP. Approximate estimate for work completion is by the end of 2024. Page 84 of 116 Item 8a 7. Address parking as a potential barrier to housing. As part of the current financial plan Major City Goal work program for Housing and Homelessness the City will evaluate its parking requirements as described in this program Develop a scope of work for possible funding as part of the 2023 -25 Financial Plan Supplement to update the City’s parking requirements in consideration of best practices that support housing production. Strategies may include lowering parking minimums, establishing parking maximums, reducing parking requirements in areas close to services and transit facilities, and other proven strategies. Staff have prepared a project plan and draft scope of work for a Parking Standards Update. A City Council agenda item for approval of issuing RFP to move this effort forward is tentatively planned for July 2024 depending on budget supplement consideration. Future Opportunities to encourage the provision of Market Rate Housing In addition to the actions already being taken by the City, the City Council could consider whether additional policy changes or work programs should be integrated into future work programs. 1. Leverage new Impactful State Laws that create opportunities for missing middle housing: There are several state laws that provide opportunities for alignment with the Major City Goal work program, especially for the development of housing that supports buyers who are ineligible for BMR housing but cannot afford more expensive homes, and for the City to ensure that the housing meets policy expectations for infill development and design. Three specific work program items identified below would provide opportunities for missing middle housing in conjunction with recent state law. a. Amend and update the City’s Objective Design Standards (ODS) to better address increased infill development expected from applications under recent state laws. On January 1, 2022, the California HOME Act, or SB9 (Atkins) took effect and makes it possible for low-density residentially (R-1) zoned properties to split their lots and build up to four homes on a single-family parcel. In anticipation of continued applications under this provision, amendments to the ODS would include more design standards that would apply and facilitate “missing middle” housing design, such as duplex, triplex, fourplex and cottage style developments, to look similar to single family housing units and easily integrate into existing lower density neighborhoods. b. Customized Pre-approved ADU plans: AB 1332 (Carrillo) streamlines and requires pre-approved ADU plans to incentivize ADU construction by January 1, 2025. Staff is in the process of allowing pre-approved ADU plans that were developed by consultants for the County of SLO through a state grant to be available for City use. The City may be able to seek additional grant support for this effort, as it requires additional work to ensure plans comply with local regulations. Page 85 of 116 Item 8a c. Pursue zoning amendments that increase missing middle housing opportunities. A zoning ordinance could utilizing incentives through SB 10 (Wiener), which is a voluntary statute effective in 2022 through 2029 that provides that local agencies may adopt an ordinance to allow up to 10 dwelling units on any parcel, at a height specified in the ordinance, if the parcel is within a transit-rich area16 (which is not applicable for the City) or urban infill site17 (which is applicable to infill areas of the City zoned for residential or mixed - use18). The law also provides increased ability for pro-housing cities to increase density without being subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) processing. The purpose of pursuing the zoning update would be specifically to further address incentivize duplex/triplex/fourplex housing units in limited areas of the City. The statute has some limitations, and the City could pursue upzoning regulations to increase missing middle housing opportunities with or without provisions of SB10. 2. Specific Plan Amendments a. Upper Monterey planning area: The current Financial Plan includes an effort to begin outreach and engagement with property owners and businesses in the Upper Monterey Special Focus Area to confirm scope in pursuing an area plan consistent with Land Use Element Policy 8.2.2. This work is scheduled to commence in the fourth quarter of FY25. The City could develop strategies for the plan to include specific provisions to increase market rate ownership and rental housing or missing middle housing, in addition to placemaking and economic revitalization for the area. b. Mid-Higuera planning area: The Mid-Higuera area could be explored as a location for zoning changes that could encourage missing middle housing. This work is not currently in the work plan but could be implemented in a future financial plan consistent with General Plan Land Use Element Program 8.4 that identifies the area as an opportunity to develop customized land use approaches19. 3. Preapproved plans for “missing middle” housing. In addition to including specific design criteria for “missing middle” housing in an update to the City’s ODS, pre-approved plan sets could be developed similar to pre-approved ADUs. This may include duplex, triplex, fourplex or cottage -style development to be “house-scale” and fit into various neighborhoods. 16 “Transit-rich area” means a parcel within one-half mile of a major transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code, or a parcel on a high-quality bus corridor. 17 “Urban infill site” refers to legal parcels in an urbanized areas, with at least 75% of site perimeter adjoining parcels developed with urban uses, and zoned for residential or mixed use. 18 Approximate number of parcels based upon estimated zoning, lot size , and developed parcels. 19 General Plan Land Use Element Program 8.4 states: “Mid-Higuera Area. The City will update the plan for this multi-block commercial area to reflect current needs and changes that have occurred since the 2001 plan was adopted". Page 86 of 116 Item 8a 4. As indicated in the SLOCOG and REACH’s Affordable by Design study as referenced above, the City could offer housing projects with missing middle design the option of ministerial review with applicable ODS criteria. Below Market Rate Housing Below market rate (BMR) housing generally refers to housing that is deed restricted to be affordable to community members at very low, low, or moderate incomes. BMR housing can be more difficult to construct, as the constraints that hinder housing supply are especially impactful to BMR housing, which has a smaller profit margin for developers, and, developers may be relying on special financing for BMR projects/units. Need for Below Market Rate Housing in San Luis Obispo According to the Census, 31% of the population in San Luis Obispo experiences poverty; however, this number is likely skewed by incomes of the relatively large student population in the City. In addition, the City’s RHNA allocation indicates that the City should encourage the construction of 825 very low income units, 520 low income units, and 603 moderate rate units between 2020 and 2028. BMR units are a crucial housing type in the housing continuum as it provides vulnerable community members the ability to stay in the community. It also provides much needed affordable housing for those who work in the City but cannot afford market rate housing due to the high housing costs in the area. To date, there have been 142 BMR units permitted in this housing element cycle. While the City is only meeting approximately 21% of the total RHNA allocation for all BMR units, it should be noted that several BMR projects received entitlements or have been deemed eligible for building permit issuance and have or are expected to pull permits in 2024 because grant, tax credit or in-lieu funding has been appropriated, which will help show significant RHNA progress next year. These projects include HASLO’s Bridge Street Family Apartments and the Maxine Lewis Apartments that are about to start construction. A summary of BMR units recently permitted or under construction are summarized in Attachment C. Nonetheless, the need for more housing that meets the need for those who make less than 120% of median income is clear. It should be noted that the City gains its moderate - income category allocation primarily by counting a portion of ADU’s as allowed by th e California HCD. And while low, very- low-income category projects are challenging, they do benefit from state and federal funding sources that are almost exclusively targeted to the below-moderate income households, or households that earn less than 80% of the AMI. There are far fewer opportunities to fund projects for households that do not qualify Page 87 of 116 Item 8a for below-moderate income units but also cannot afford market rate units in SLO because they are generally making between 80% and 120% of AMI. Constraints to the provision of Below Market Rate Housing The constraints to the provision of BMR housing units are very similar to the constraints for the provision of market rate units explained in the previous section of this report. For BMR units in particular, the financing aspect is extremely important due to the fact that BMR units generally do not make a profit and many affordable housing projects depend on grant funding or other subsidies, such as tax credits. Opportunities to encourage the provision of Below Market Rate Housing Existing City Programs and Policies The City has taken actions to encourage BMR housing units over several years. These actions include: 1. Density Bonus Incentives work to promote higher densities in both the market rate and BMR housing continuum. The incentives provide developers with significant opportunities to construct more market rate housing with relaxed development requirements with the provision of BMR housing.20 As explained above under market rate housing, the City has implemented density bonus programs. These programs also help make affordable housing more viable in a project. Minor amendments to the Zoning Ordinance are needed to maintain consistency with state Density Bonus Law, including recent state legislation, AB1287 (Alvarez), which allows additional incentives and concessions. The ordinance update is estimated to come to the Council before the end of 2024. 2. In 202221, the City updated its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to help address impacts that occur as a result of residential or commercial development in the form of requiring BMR units or payment of an in-lieu fee. Since the most recent version of the ordinance became effective in September 2022, $416,080 of in -lieu fees have been collected22. Fees collected are placed in the City’s Affordable Housing Fund and affordable housing developers may apply to the City Council for funds for 100% BMR projects for low and very low-income eligible households. 3. Grant and long-term loan awards from the City’s Affordable Housing Fund. The City’s AHF receives revenue through the IHO, loan repayments, one-time funds directed by the City Council (for example, through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) see below), and anticipated future state Prohousing Incentive Funds. 20 The Density Bonus Law (found in California Government Code Sections 65915 – 65918) provides developers with tools to encourage the development of affordable and senior housing, including up to a 50% increase in project densities for most projects, dependi ng on the amount of affordable housing provided, and an 80% increase in density for projects which are completely affordable. 21 (Resolution No. 11349 (2022 Series) 22 Projects entitled prior to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance are not subject to the updated in -lieu and commercial linkage fees including San Luis Ranch and Avila Ranch. Page 88 of 116 Item 8a BMR housing developers, such as the Housing Authority of San Luis Obispo (HASLO) and Peoples Self Help Housing (PSHH) apply to the City Council for the funds for use of the funds for the provision of affordable housing and for reasonable costs associated with the development of affordable housing at the discretion of the Council23. The City has made 22 awards since 2003 for at total of $15.7M and a total of 633 units (please see Affordable Housing Fund information in Attachment D). 4. Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process provided through SB 35 and SB 423 (Wiener) that allows qualif ied multifamily infill projects with BMR housing units to go through a simplified and expedited housing approval process and use Objective Design Standards for jurisdictions that are not meeting RHNA production in all categories. 3. Use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to leverage financing for affordable housing projects. In June 2022, the City Council authorized a one -time use of ARPA funds by allocating $2,964,467 into the Affordable Housing Fund in the 2022-2023 Supplemental Budget to support at -risk populations via affordable housing fund awards to be made at the City Council’s sole discretion24. This money has been awarded to HASLO for the Anderson Hotel project and Maxine Lewis Apartment Project. 4. Expand down-payment assistance programs for below-market assistance programs. The City is a participant in the state Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods (BEGIN) program that provides down-payment assistance loans to first-time low and moderate-income homebuyers. The program was launched in 2009 through $300k from the California HCD and used for 10-units within the Laurel Creek development. The City currently does not have available funds under the BEGIN program but does make new loans based upon when older loans are repaid. However, the state is not issuing new applications for program funds through HCD. Work has recently started on development of an expanded program using other state program funds, however feasibility has not yet been determined. 5. Further development of the City’s BMR Housing Administration, and updates to Affordable Housing Guidelines and Standards and the City’s Equity Share program. This program is needed to provide options, education and transparency to better connect potential purchasers and renters to BMR units. The City has previously updated standards and guidelines and continue to receive input from the real estate and lending community to help eligible buyers. The standards are continuing to be evaluated for potential updates to improve the process for applicants, builders, and the City. 23 https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/17.138.060 24 Resolution No. 11333 approving the allocation of $13,564,467 in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds in Accordance with the U.S. Treasury Final Rule Page 89 of 116 Item 8a Future Opportunities to encourage Below Market Rate Housing 1. As the City is now designated as a Prohousing City by the state, application will be made for Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) funds that may be used for a variety of purposes, including support for affordable and special needs housing as well as for programs such as down payment assistance. Application for funds for up to $750,000 is underway and expected to be submitted in March. 2. Investigation into bond programs or other local revenue measure could lead to the generation of a dedicated local revenue stream. Tax exempt bond programs could help increase the supply of BMR rental units for moderate-income qualifying households by new construction of BMR units or allowing acquisition of market rate apartment buildings that are then converted to BMR rental housing for moderate-income households25 and provide rehabilitation of apartment unit stock. General obligation bonds or a local revenue measure would similarly develop a dedicated funding stream for BMR housing26. Such measures would require outside resources to develop. 3. Update development impact fee loan deferrals that expand opportunities to help reduce initial costs for projects that include affordable housing. Loan deferrals are currently made to 100% affordable housing projects and helps projects receive tax credit financing. An update to criteria for these loan deferrals in consideration of best practices, and inclusive of loan deferral timelines and repayment provisions may be ready for City Council in summer 2024. 4. SB 4 (Sen. Wiener) provides by-right approval and CEQA exempt status for affordable housing on land owned by religious organizations and higher education institutions, which sunsets on Jan 1, 2036. The City has 41 properties that would qualify under this statute, 18 of which are larger than an acre and may allow limited construction of units depending on many factors and interest. The City has not received any applications under SB4, although there has been some discussion in monthly faith community meetings with staff regarding opportunities. Units could be BMR rental units or alternatively, as described below, units could be temporary modular units and rented in conjunction with a supportive s ervice partner. Incentives could be developed to encourage applications, with provision of staff resources. 5. Leverage City property to promote BMR housing including providing funding support for the Waterman Village on Dana Street. On February 6, 2024, the City Council approved an amended and restated exclusive negotiating agreement with Smart Share Housing Solutions to allow rehabilitation and adaptive re -use of the 25 Programs include the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (“CSCDA”), California Community Housing Agency (“CalCHA”), and the California Municipal Finance Authority (“CMFA”). 26 The ability to pass local tax or bond measures may be impacted by the recent passage of Assembly Constitutional Amendment 1, and dependent on the November 2024 election, may allow the threshold to pass measures for taxes and bonds that cities use to pay f or affordable housing to be lowered from two- thirds to 55%. Page 90 of 116 Item 8a City-owned Rosa Butron Adobe together with installation of small clustered BMR residential units. If approved, the project would allow the City to leverage property and an opportunity to consider awards from the Affordable Housing Fund to create 20-BMR housing units. The project is currently in the process of environmental review. Permanent Supportive Housing Permanent Supportive Housing is below market rate housing that includes on or off -site services to assist residents in retaining housing, improving their health status, and maximizing their ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. Examples in the City of permanent supportive housing are HASLO’s Anderson Hotel and the upcoming People’s Self-Help Housing project at the Calle Joaquin Homekey, which together will bring 144 additional permanent supportive housing units to the City. These units will add to the 19 existing permanent supportive units operated by People’s Self-Help Housing at Broad Street Plance and Brizzolara Apartments and 151 beds operated by Transitions- Mental Health Association throughout the City. Need for Permanent Supportive Housing in the Community Permanent supportive housing has evolved to be more recognized in recent years as a critical component in homelessness prevention and the reduction of homelessness due in part to deinstitutionalization trends and the reduction of state funding for mental health and social service programs27 over the last four decades and the growing popularity of housing first policies.28 2022 Point in Time Count29 data for the City of San Luis Obispo shows that 248 individuals were experiencing unsheltered homelessness, and 137 individuals were experiencing sheltered homelessness, utilizing emergency shelters or transitional housing. Those 385 individuals represent a segment of the population tha t would benefit from permanent supportive housing opportunities. Currently, unhoused individuals who are utilizing the emergency shelter at 40 Prado Homeless Services Center, or other emergency shelter or transitional housing options, are struggling to transition out of those short-term housing options into permanent housing solutions due to the lack of available permanent supportive housing. 27 https://californialocal.com/localnews/statewide/ca/article/show/4114-california-mental-health-crisis- gavin-newsom-care-court/ 28 https://files.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Housing-First-Permanent-Supportive-Housing- Brief.pdf 29 https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Social-Services/Homeless-Services-Division/Point-in-Time- Count/Previous-PIT-Count-Reports/2022-SLO-County-PIT-Count-Report.pdf Page 91 of 116 Item 8a Constraints As permanent supportive housing is housing connected with social services, further development of this type of housing supply requires collaboration with the County of SLO and homelessness and housing services providers. Additionally, the service aspect of this type of housing requires additional operating funding beyond capital and maintenance expenses. Opportunities to Encourage Permanent Supportive Housing Existing City Programs and Policies 1. The City applied and received a Project Homekey grant from the State in the amount of $19.4 million for the Calle Joaquin Homekey project with People’s Self- Help Housing (PSHH) as co-applicants. This project will provide 75 additional Permanent Supportive Housing units. 2. The City continues to collaborate closely with the County of San Luis Obispo to implement the recently awarded $13.4 million Encampment Resolution Grant for the Welcome Home Village project30 that will provide 46 permanent supportive housing units as part of an 80-unit project to house people experiencing homelessness on the Bob Jones Bike Trail Corridor. The City will utilize $574,000 of the grant funding for encampment outreach and services , including portable restrooms and trash receptacles. This significantly impactful project will provide a path back to housing for those that are currently living unsheltered in the Bob Jones encampment corridor; reduce the burden of homelessness on surrounding neighborhoods; and improve response capacity of service providers and outreach teams. 3. The City amended the Zoning Ordinance in 2021 in accordance with state law to allow permanent supportive housing b y-right in all zones in the City that allow residential or mixed-use (a minor use permit is required in the Public Facility district and the use is prohibited in Agriculture, Open Space or Business Park Districts), and allow ministerial processing of permits in order to ensure that zoning or process are not barriers to the development of this type of housing. Calle Joaquin Homekey is an example of a Permanent Supportive Housing project that is being processed ministerially through these zoning amendments. Future Opportunities to encourage Permanent Supportive Housing 1. Provide continued support for permanent supportive housing partners as they pursue additional projects in the City, including funding for THMA’s Palm Street Studios. Palm Street Studios will provide six (6) one-bedroom units and two (2) one-bedroom ADUs for a total of 8 supportive housing units. The project will also provide behavioral health treatment and services for the most vulnerable homeless individuals. Palm Street Studios is not yet included in the City’s RHNA numbers as it is still in the pipeline. Although the City Council previously allocated $300K of Affordable Housing Funds for the project, those funds were reallocated to the Maxine Lewis Orcutt Road Apartments, and it is expected that THMA will re- request funds in Sprint 2024. 30 https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/welcomehomevillage.aspx Page 92 of 116 Item 8a 2. Leverage legislation under SB 4 (Weiner), as discussed above under the Future Opportunities for BMR Housing section. This may come in the form of housing units or pallet shelters that are developed or pla ced on church properties in conjunction with a housing partner such as PSHH, HASLO or Habitat for Humanity, and managed and operated with services provided as permanent supportive housing units. Transitional Housing In addition to permanent supportive housing, interim or transitional housing opportunities are needed to bridge the gap between unsheltered homelessness and the utilization of emergency shelters and/or permanent supportive housing. Transitional housing provides individuals and families with temporary, non-congregate housing, including supportive services, to create stability and facilitate the transition into permanent housing. Need for Transitional Housing The population of individuals experiencing unsheltered and sheltered homelessness in the City of SLO would benefit from the availability of transitional housing opportunities to serve as an interim option until permanent housing is available. Transi tional housing also serves as a helpful tool in preparing individuals for permanent housing by facilitating treatment and service referrals, vocational training, and employment support. Transitional housing programs traditionally operate on a 90-day minimum timeframe to provide a period of time for participants to engage in supportive services and prepare for the transition to permanent housing. The City does not directly operate or fund transitional housing programs, however Transitions Mental Health Association (TMHA) currently operates a 12-bed transitional housing program in the City of SLO. The Adult Transitional Program (ATP) is facilitated through a contract with the County’s Behavioral Health Department and requires direct referrals from Behavioral Health. The transitional housing site is staffed 24-hours a day, 7 days a week and provides a higher level of care to clients with severe mental illnesses. The maximum length of stay at ATP is 18 months. TMHA was also recently awarded a 3-year contract from the County Behavioral Health Department to operate a 10-bed transitional housing program similar to ATP with the target population originating from and referred through the Countywide CARE Court system similar to how clients are referred to housing through the Coordinated Entry System. This new system is estimated to be implemented Countywide by the end of 2024. As a part of that program, TMHA will also operate an 8-bed step-down transitional Page 93 of 116 Item 8a housing program for clients moving towards housing independence who do not require the higher level of support. These 18 transitional housing beds will be located within the City of SLO and TMHA is scheduled to start housing clients in those projects in July 2024. Constraints Similar to permanent supportive housing, the social services that are integral to transitional housing adds significant operational costs to housing developments. In addition, a substantial constraint for transitional housing can be neighborhood opposition , which may lengthen the time frame and expense for approval and/or implementation of transitional housing projects. Existing City Programs and Policies In recognition of the need and role transitional housing has in the City, the City has actively partnered with the County of San Luis Obispo and other regional partners to encourage the provision of more transitional housing. Specific projects and policies supporting transitional housing include: 1. The Welcome Home Village project described above under the Existing Opportunities for Permanent Supportive Housing section provides 34 transitional housing units as part of the 80-unit project to house people experiencing homelessness on the Bob Jones Bike Trail Corridor. 2. The 2021 Zoning amendments also allowed for transitional housing by-right in most zones in the City (a minor-use permit would be needed in the Public Facility district and the use is prohibited in the Agriculture, Open Space or Business Park Districts), to allow ministerial processing of permits in order to ensure that zoning or process are not barriers to the development of this type of housing. Opportunities to Encourage Transitional Housing 1. Ongoing support for CAPSLO, which is working to develop projects in San Luis Obispo to shelter and house families experiencing homeles sness with one-time funding from a $5 million Bezos Day 1 Families Fund Grant. Potential projects may include transitional and/or permanent supportive housing for families. 2. Other future opportunities for additional transitional housing will likely emerge through grant opportunities and continued collaboration and support for Regional Partners, including PSHH, Five Cities Homeless Coalition (5CHC), ECHO, TMHA, Restorative Partners, and others. Emergency Shelters Page 94 of 116 Item 8a Emergency shelters provide temporary shelter for unhoused individuals without requiring participants to sign a lease or occupancy agreement. Emergency shelters generally provide overnight shelter, meals, restrooms, showers, and laundry facilities, and other basic needs such as toiletries, clothing, and bedding. Emergency shelters often include case management requirements and/or housing-focused programming. Need for Emergency Shelters The City’s main opportunity for successful homelessness response efforts is homelessness prevention by connecting individuals to shelter, services and housing. Sheltering unhoused community members through emergency shelters does not only offer lifesaving protection from the elements and critical provision of safety, but it is inclusive of food, showers and restrooms, and connection to social services. Emergency shelters are often the first point of contact unhoused individuals have to services and they serve as the gateway to treatment, services, and housing opportunities. Emergency shelters are not often considered as part of the housing continuum; however, shelters operate as places community members live in the City. Constraints Since the City has no ongoing state or federal funding sources for social services, the City has limited control over adequate operational resources to match needed capacity for emergency shelters. The continued operation of emergency shelters requires a substantial amount of funding. Additionally, similar to transit ional housing constraints, emergency shelters encounter challenges related to community and neighborhood opposition. The City allows Homeless shelters by-right in all zones except Agriculture, Conservation/Open Space, Business Park, and R-1 districts. Funding is a critical constraint as ongoing capacity needs, maintenance and operational needs are pressing. Existing City Programs and Policies The 40 Prado Homeless Services Center (40 Prado HSC) is the only emergency shelter in the City and it has required significant investment from the City and County of SLO over the past decade31. In response to the increasing need, expansion of other formats of emergency shelters have expanded in the north and south county in the past few years , and the work of cities, county and service providers is evolving to inform a coordinated system of shelter32. However, each facility operates near capacity limits. 1. Funding and collaboration: The 40 Prado HSC is the primary entry point for the continuum of care for services, and it is a critical component of the housing continuum for people experiencing homelessness. The City provides funding for 31 The Prado Day Center opened in September 1997, providing day services and meals in partnership with The People’s Kitchen. In 2018, the Prado Day Center and the Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter were combined to form the new 40 Prado HSC facility, built in partnership between the public and private sectors. 40 Prado HSC remains the only emergency, congregate shelter in SLO County, serving unhoused individuals countywide. 32 El Camino Homeless Organization (ECHO) operates a 60-bed shelter in Atascadero, and in 2020 expanded their operations to include 70 shelter beds in the Paso Robles Homekey. In South County, 5 Cities Homeless Coalition operates 20 temporary emergency shelter beds at their Cabins for Change site, which utilizes modular units. Page 95 of 116 Item 8a the 40 Prado HSC from the general fund through each financial plan to support ongoing operations for 129 shelter beds, overnight capacity expansion, warming center, hotel voucher, and safe parking programming, and in -kind bus tokens, currently funded at $238,826 through the 2023-2025 Financial Plan. Additionally, CAPSLO has received funding through the City’s competitive grant programs, including $341,959 of the City’s allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDGB) funds from 2020-202433. 2. Overnight Safe Parking: In 2013, the City adopted regulations for safe parking facilities on property located outside of the public right-of-way in certain zoning districts34. The purpose of the safe parking ordinance was to provide homeless individuals and families with vehicles a safe place to temporarily park overnight in order to facilitate the transition to permanent housing. The 40 Prado HSC recently received approval of an amended conditional use permit to increase the capacity of the 40 Prado Safe Parking Program from seven to twelve safe parking spaces that provide people experiencing vehicular homelessness with a safe place to park overnight and connection to services. The program requires participants to register through the 40 Prado HSC and engage in case management35. During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency Declaration, the City of SLO partnered with CAPSLO to implement an Overnight Safe Parking Pilot Program for up to 20 vehicles at the Railroad Square location. The program operated from April 2021 to August 2023, and successfully facilitated permanent housing placements, family reunifications, and job placements for participants. In conjunction with the COVID-19 emergency order being lifted, the City’s Safe Parking Pilot Program ended in August 2023 and participants transitioned to the 40 Prado Safe Parking Program. The City and CAPSLO are partnering with faith - based organizations to develop a Rotating Overnight Safe Parking Program that would provide 12 overnight safe parking spaces at various host site locations that would rotate on a monthly basis. The City also continues to advocate for a regional safe parking model to provide safe parking for homeless individuals Countywide. Future Opportunities to support success of Emergency Shelter City programs to support Emergency Shelter are incorporated in the Homelessness Response Strategic Plan, however two critical programs that require City funds and staff support are described below: 1. Support strategic collaboration to ensure resiliency of t he 40 Prado HSC and sustainability of emergency shelter operations due to the increasing homelessness crisis and unanticipated events such as pandemic response and climate 33 The City receives yearly funding allocations for the CDBG program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as a subrecipient of the SLO County Urban Counties Cooperation Agreement. 34 Ordinance 1592 (2013 Series) 35 https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/17.86.230 Page 96 of 116 Item 8a adaptation for extreme weather events, including heat waves and flooding. Page 97 of 116 Item 8a 2. Facilitate the establishment of small scale (12 parking spaces or less) overnight safe parking programs operated in conjunction with the 40 Prado Safe Parking Program at City and faith-based partner sites throughout the City in a rotating format to provide individuals experiencing vehicular homelessness throughout the city with safe locations to park overnight and connections to services, including housing navigation services. People Experiencing Homelessness Need for Services Homelessness is a component in the housing continuum because community members live unhoused and unsheltered throughout the City. A conservative estimate of the number of people experiencing homelessness is 385 according to the 2022 SLO County Point-in-Time data, which includes individuals experiencing sheltered and unsheltered homelessness. Ensuring available housing supply is critical to implement rapid re-housing and/or homelessness prevention.36 Constraints The greatest challenges to addressing and preventing homelessness are the ava ilability of shelter, affordable housing, and services. In order to effectively and consistently respond to homelessness, it is vital to have a robust continuum of housing offering pathways out of homelessness and into permanent housing. In addition to hou sing and shelter needs, the City is reliant on the County and regional partners to provide adequate funding and services, including social services and behavioral health services. When the provision of any or all of those services are at capacity, the City’s homelessness response efforts are constrained. 36 Rapid Re-housing activities are designed to move people experiencing homelessness into permanent housing as quickly as possible. Component services and assistance generally consist of short -term and medium-term rental assistance, rental arrears, rental application fees, security deposits, advance payment of last month's rent, utility deposits and payments, moving costs, housing search and placement, housing stability case management, mediation, legal services, and credit repair. Homelessness Prevention activities are designed to prevent an individual or family from moving into an emergency shelter or living in a public or private place not meant for human habitation. Component services and assistance ge nerally consist of short-term and medium-term tenant-based or project-based rental assistance, rental arrears, rental application fees, security deposits, advance payment of last month's rent, utility deposits and payments, moving costs, housing search and placement, housing stability case management, mediation, legal services, and credit repair. https://www.hudexchange.info/homelessness-assistance/coc-esg-virtual- binders/esg-program-components/rapid-re-housing/ Page 98 of 116 Item 8a Existing and Future Opportunities to Reduce Homelessness Homelessness Strategic Plan The City’s first Homelessness Response Strategic Plan was adopted by City Council on March 21, 2023, as a two-year plan to support the Countywide Plan to Address Homelessness. This study session provides the opportunity to focus on housing and homelessness response. Additionally, homelessness response activities specific to homelessness prevention are tied to key component areas in the Homelessness Response Strategic Plan and summarized in Attachment E. Staff will be providing an update of the City’s Strategic Plan to the City Council in May 2024. Summary of Future Opportunities to Fill Gaps in Housing Continuum For City Council consideration, future opportunities identified above for each component of the housing continuum are summarized in Attachment F, with preliminary considerations from staff. Most programs will require capacity and resources to assess feasibility. Focus Questions Focus questions identified for consideration of the proposed strategic direction are summarized below: 1. Are there housing types on the housing continuum or programs that are of special interest to the City Council that should be pursued in the next financial plan? 2. Are there housing types or programs that are not discussed in this report that staff should consider? 3. Which of the programs in Attachment F does the City Council direct staff to explore for future work programs for the next financial plan cycle, for which planning will begin in the Fall, in balance with competing needs. Previous Council or Advisory Body Action Previous City Council actions applicable to the Housing MCG work program include:  Objective Design Standards  2021 Zoning Regulations Update  Flexible Density Ordinance  Subdivision Ordinance Update  Homelessness Response Strategic Plan  Homekey Round 3  Prohousing Designation Public Engagement Housing Engagement Activities that impact this study session benefitted from the public outreach process conducted during the update of the 2020 Housing Element, and public engagement activities for previous City Council actions listed above. Page 99 of 116 Item 8a Primary Homelessness Response Engagement Activitie s continue to benefit from the Homelessness Response Strategic Planning community engagement efforts and the recently conducted Annual Community Survey, which received 366 responses .37 CONCURRENCE Community Development concurs with this report. For Homelessness Response, the City’s Steering Committee for Homelessness Response have provided input into housing and homelessness prevention activities listed in this report. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the recommended actions in this report because the actions do not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. If a housing project or programs is developed, it will be evaluated to determine if the project or program or any of its components requires environmental review under CEQA prior to adoption. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2023-25 Funding Identified: N/A Fiscal Analysis: Funding Sources Total Budget Available Current Funding Request Remaining Balance Annual Ongoing Cost General Fund $ $ $ $ State Federal Fees Other: Total $ $ $ $ There are no fiscal impacts directly associated with this item. Actions to address issues related to the City’s housing continuum, including options to increase and diversify housing supply in the City may have an associated fiscal impact. Those impacts will be identified at the time that specific recommendations are made to the Council. 37 https://communityfeedback.opengov.com/portals/sanluisobispoca/Issue_13401 Page 100 of 116 Item 8a ALTERNATIVES Continue consideration to a future meeting. If the City Council does not have sufficient information to provide direction to staff, or if additional time is needed for discussion, the Council can continue consideration of the item to a future meeting. If the City Council decides to continue the meeting, direction should be provided to staff on any additional information needed to complete the discussion. ATTACHMENTS A – Key Housing Work Program B – Major Development Projects C – BMR Pipeline Projects D – Affordable Housing Fund E – Key Components Homelessness Strategic Plan F - Summary of Future Potential Housing Opportunities Page 101 of 116 Page 102 of 116 ATTACHMENT A KEY HOUSING WORK PROGRAM PROJECTS Table 1 Key Housing Work Program Projects HE Program No. HE Policy or Program Key Housing Work Program Projects Status 6.22; 2.17; 2.18 Update the City’s municipal code to expand objective design standards within one year of the adoption of the Housing Element Update: Allowance of developments that include at least 20% low income affordable units by-right: Utilize objective design standards to allow residential uses by-right for developments that include at least 20% low income units Objective Design Standards (Streamlining) Completed 5.5 Update the Zoning Regulations to allow mixed- use development within Service Commercial (C- S) and Manufacturing (M) zones Zoning Code Update (Add Flexibility) Completed 6.23 Update the development review process and expand the thresholds of each review level (minor, moderate, and major) to eliminate or reduce the number of public hearing required for housing projects within one year of adopting the Housing Element. Zoning Code Update (Streamlining) Completed 2.13 Update the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, including Table 2A, based on findings and recommendations in the 2020 Affordable Housing Nexus Study and conduct further feasibility analysis in order to evaluate the City’s ability to provide affordable housing in the proportions shown in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation, per Policy 2.4. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO) Update (RHNA) Completed 4.6 Amend the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to require that affordable units in a development be of similar size, number of bedrooms, character and basic quality as the non-restricted units in locations that avoid segregation of such units, including equivalent ways to satisfy the requirement. Also evaluate adjusting the City’s allowable sales prices for deed-restricted affordable units per a variety of unit types. IHO Update (BMR Housing production) Completed Page 103 of 116 2.15 Update of the Zoning Regulations and Community Design Guidelines to incorporate flexible density development options in Downtown Core and portions of Upper Monterey and Mid-Higuera Special Focus Areas. Flexible Density (Missing Middle) Completed. 6.20 Evaluate and update the Subdivision Regulations, within three years of Housing Element adoption, to support small lot subdivisions, ownership bungalow court development and other alternatives to conventional subdivision design. Subdivision Update (Missing Middle) Completed 5.3 and 5.4 Encourage the development of a variety of “missing middle” housing types. Evaluate and implement “missing middle” housing types (e.g. duplex, triplex, quadplex, cottages, etc.) to increase housing options in the City within three years of adopting the Housing Element Missing Middle Housing Ongoing 1.1 Assist those citizens unable to obtain safe shelter on their own. Homelessness Response Strategic Plan Ongoing 2.4 Encourage housing production for all financial strata of the City's population, as allocated in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation, for the 6th cycle planning period. The number of units per income category are: extremely low and very low income, 825 units; low income, 520 units; moderate income, 604 units; and above moderate income, 1,405 units RHNA Ongoing 3.5 Encourage and support creative strategies for the rehabilitation and adaptation and reuse of residential, commercial and industrial structures for housing. Project Homekey (BMR production and Homelessness Response) Ongoing 6.8 To help meet the 6th cycle RHNA production targets, the City will support residential infill development and promote higher residential density where appropriate. Updates to Airport Area Specific Plan and Santa Margaria Area Specific Plan (RHNA; Missing Middle) Ongoing 7.3 Higher density housing should maintain high quality standards for unit design, privacy, security, amenities, and public and private open space. Such standards should be flexible enough to allow innovative design solutions. Second update Objective Design Standards (Missing Middle Ongoing Page 104 of 116 9.3 Continue to encourage the development of dwellings with energy-efficient designs, utilizing passive and active solar features, and the use of energy-saving techniques that exceed minimums prescribed by State law. Clean Energy for New Buildings (Sustainability) Ongoing 8.1 Encourage housing development that meets a variety of special needs, including large families, single parents, disabled persons, the elderly, students, veterans, farmworkers, the homeless, or those seeking congregate care, group housing, single-room occupancy, or cohousing accommodations, utilizing universal design. Flexible Density Program; Collaborating with BMR developers; Leveraging ARPA funding for Anderson Hotel and Maxine Lewis Orcutt Road Apartments; Project Homekey; supporting SLO County Encampment Resolution Grant/Welcome Home Village Ongoing Page 105 of 116 Page 106 of 116 Attachment B Major Development Projects in the Construction Pipeline Major Development Projects Development Status Unit Count Orcutt Area Under Construction 36 San Luis Ranch Permits Issued 164 Avila Ranch Under Construction 66 2800 Broad Mixed-Use Under Construction 20 Lofts at the Creamery Under Construction 36 1131 Olive Mixed Use Under Construction 10 Peach Street Commons Under Construction 5 Laurel Creek Mixed Use Under Construction 100 Montalban Mixed Use Under Construction 11 Victoria Crossing Mixed Use Under Construction 30 Total 478 Page 107 of 116 Page 108 of 116 ATTACHMENT C RECENTLY PERMITTED AND PIPELINE BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING PROJECTS Project Name Affordability Status Total Units Extremely Low Very Low Low Moderate Caretakers Broad Street Place 40 12 7 20 0 1 Under Construction Toscano 38 2 27 8 0 1 Under Construction Tiburon Place 68 24 15 28 0 1 Under Construction The Anderson Hotel 68 66 0 2 Under Construction Bridge Street Family Apt 94 94 0 Building Permit Review Jones Mixed- Use 9 9 0 Building Permit Review Palm Street Studios 8 8 0 Building Permit Review Monterey Mixed Use 106 106 0 Entitlements Approved Orcutt Road Apartments 40 39 0 1 Entitlements Approved Waterman Village 22 21 0 1 Entitlements Under Review Victoria Mixed-use 33 33 0 Entitlements Under Review Avila Ranch Multi-Family 60 Awaiting Submittal Project Homekey* 75 75 Building Permit Review Welcome Home Village* 80 80 SLO County Self Permit TOTAL 741** 193 123 358 0 7 *Permanent and Transitional Housing Units included for the purposes of RHNA reporting. Income levels estimated. ** Income levels for Avila Ranch Multi-family not yet estimated. Page 109 of 116 Page 110 of 116 ATTACHMENT D Affordable Housing Fund Awards Year Project AHF Award Unit Count 2002-03 Judson Terrace Lodge $ 215,000.00 32 2006-07 Peoples' Self Help Housing: Villas at South Higuera $ 500,000.00 28 2007-08 Moylan Terrace $ 709,900.00 27 2008-09 Habitat for Humanity $ 332,500.00 2 2009-10 Aids Support Network $ 82,780.00 4 2009-10 Village at Broad $ 1,905,809.00 41 2009-10 Wineman Hotel Rehab $ 1,500,000.00 30 2009-10 TMHA 3592 Broad $ 174,700.16 2 2011-12 Habitat for Humanity $ 38,783.00 3 2014-15 South Street Apartments $ 650,000.00 43 2014-15 TMHA Supportive Housing $ 95,814.00 1 2014-15 860 On the Wye $ 352,029.00 20 2014-15 Iron Works $ 920,000.00 46 2016-17 Bishop Street Studios $ 850,000.00 34 2017-18 Courtyard at the Meadows $ 630,000.00 36 2019-20 Broad Street Place $ 1,300,000.00 40 2019-20 Tiburon Place $ 700,000.00 68 2020-21 HASLO-SLONP At-Risk of Homelessness Acquisition $ 77,000.00 1 2020-21 Toscano Apartments $ 335,000.00 38 2021-2022 Anderson Inn Acquisition and Renovation $ 1,700,000.00 68 2023-24 Bridge Street $ 1,429,286.00 30 2023-24 Maxine Lewis Apartments $ 1,264,467.00 39 Total $ 15,763,068.16 633 Page 111 of 116 Page 112 of 116 Key Components Progress and Opportunities 1 Communications Enable equitable access to resources and increase transparency so that all community members are aware of efforts to address gaps in service and know where/how/when to reach out for assistance to address concerns related to homelessness. • Provision of Homeless Resource Pocket Guides to unhoused community members, businesses, and community partners to help connect individuals with resources and emergency shelter. • Annual Homelessness Response Survey conducted to receive input and prioritize housing needs for our community. 2 Data Streamline internal and external data collection processes to enable timely and effective coordination of homelessness response efforts and provide analysis to inform best practices. • Collaborated with County on 2024 Point in Time Count to establish baseline data for the number of individuals experiencing unsheltered and sheltered homelessness in the City of SLO. 3 Pilot Programs Collaborate with the County to develop scalable and replicable programs to connect those experiencing homelessness to a variety of shelter and housing options through timely outreach, and advocate for County implementation of successful programs. • SLOPD’s Community Action Team (CAT) engaged with 408 people in 2023, with 258 individuals electing to receive referrals to mental health and/or substance abuse services. CAT also reunified 6 individuals with family members or agencies and facilitated 3 permanent housing placements. • The Fire Department’s Mobile Crisis Unit (MCU) established 3,285 contacts with individuals experiencing homelessness in 2023, reunified 91 individuals with agencies or family, provided 56 transports to services or alternate facilities, and fielded a total of 265 mental health crisis intervention calls for service. • Collaborating with faith-based organizations and CAPSLO to develop a Rotating Overnight Safe Parking Program • The City continues to advocate for scalable and replicable programs Countywide, including a Regional Safe Parking Program. 4 Funding Opportunities Proactively seek funding opportunities to meet localized needs as aligned with regional goals to prevent and address homelessness. • Collaborated with the County on the Encampment Resolution Funding opportunity, which was awarded in June 2023 for the Welcome Home Village (WHV) Project. WHV will provide 34 transitional housing units and 46 permanent supportive housing units. • Collaborated with People’s Self-Help Table 1: Homelessness Response Strategic Plan Goals Page 113 of 116 Key Components Progress and Opportunities Housing, the County, HASLO, and the Balay Ko Foundation on a Homekey Round 3 application, which was awarded in December 2023 for the Calle Joaquin Homekey Project. Calle Joaquin Homekey will provide 75 permanent supportive housing units. 5 Regional Collaboration & Engagement Engage regional partners in collaborative efforts to improve the effective use of resources. • Collaborating with County, regional housing and homeless services providers, and community organizations to identify housing continuum and service needs, establish priorities, and develop implementation strategies. Page 114 of 116 ATTACHMENT F SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES TO FILL GAPS IN THE SLO HOUSING CONTINUUM PROJECT OR PROGRAM RESOURCE INTENSITY APPROXIMATE TIME NEEDED TO COMPLETE MARKET RATE HOUSING 1. Leverage New or Recent State Laws 1a. Update Objective Design standards Medium (may seek state grants) < 1 yr. 1b. Customized Pre-approved ADU plans Low to medium -depending on the number of plans to provide as pre-approved < 1 yr. 1c. Allow additional density through zoning amendments in limited areas to allow more missing middle housing High 1 yr. – 2 yr. 2. Specific Plan Amendments 2a. Upper Monterey planning area High 1 yr. – 2 yr. 2b. Mid-Higuera planning area High 1 yr. – 2 yr. 3. Pre-approved plans – “missing middle” typologies Medium 1 yr. – 2 yr. 4. Zoning amendments for additional project to receive ministerial review Medium < 1 yr. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING 1. Apply for Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) funds Low, underway (additional NOFA’s expected in the future) Immediate 2. Participate in state tax exempt bond programs to help increase the supply of BMR rental units; or local revenue measure High 1 yr. – 3 yr. 3. Update development impact fee loan deferral program Low <1 yr. (summer 2024) 4. Develop incentives for property owners for SB4 housing development Medium 1yr. – 2yr. 5. Support BMR housing on City property – Waterman Village Low < 1 yr. Page 115 of 116 PROJECT OR PROGRAM RESOURCE INTENSITY APPROXIMATE TIME NEEDED TO COMPLETE PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING 1. Fund and collaborate with supportive housing partners including TMHA and PSHH to develop additional units Low - medium ongoing 2. Collaborate and develop a program with housing partners, service providers and the faith community for small-scale permanent housing development on church properties. Medium 1yr. – 2 yr. TRANSITIONAL HOUSING 1. Support potential CAPSLO projects to house families experiencing homelessness including potential project to provide beds and housing for families. Low - medium <1 yr. 2. Pursue grant funds and collaborate with service providers to development more beds. Low - medium ongoing EMERGENCY SHELTER 1. Support Resiliency Strategic Plan for 40 Prado HSC Low <1 yr. 2. Support 12-parking space expansion of overnight safe parking through 40 Prado HSC rotating safe parking program. Low – medium <1 yr. HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE 1. Continued resource support to implement the Homelessness Response Strategic Plan. Medium ongoing Page 116 of 116 1 Housing Needs and Opportunities City Council Study Session March 5, 2024 2 Recommendation Receive presentation and conduct a study session on current status of the City’s housing continuum,including options to increase and diversify housing supply in the City. Feedback will inform future work plan items. 3 Purpose of Study Session 1.Provide an overview of housing in San Luis Obispo using concept of a “continuum of housing” for all community members. 2.Provide an opportunity to discuss housing needs and opportunities within the City’s role in housing. 3.Provide City Council with an opportunity to provide staff with feedback and direction as to whether there are opportunities that staff should further explore as the City seeks to encourage the provision of a diverse housing stock for all community members. 4.This study session will not cover all aspects of housing opportunities and will focus on City role in housing and homelessness response. 4 Background •2023-2025 Financial Plan Major City Goal for Housing and Homelessness included an action item to “conduct a study session with the City Council to identify needs and opportunities across the housing spectrum, including various types of transitional and supportive housing” •2020-2028 City 6th Cycle General Plan Housing Element includes policies and programs to increase housing projection and diversified supply •2023 City adopted first Homelessness Response Strategic Plan including measures to increase opportunities for shelter and housing 5 Housing and Homelessness Crises CA has some of the most expensive home prices and rents in the nation and scale of homelessness crisis is larger than any other state Significant housing legislation since 2017 to remove housing barriers and increase accountability Need and opportunity to reshape local policy to align with state legislative mandates including Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) City’s Major City Goals help prioritize implementation of 6th Cycle Housing Element for supply, fair housing, affordability, special needs and homelessness response Opportunities exist for a variety of housing types combined with General Plan smart growth principals to align with other City Major City Goals 6 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) 7 Housing Continuum 8 Housing Continuum –Market Rate Housing 2,126 permitted units 2020-2028 RHNA Cycle 9 Market Rate Housing NEED: •City has exceeded RHNA -Success! •Market rate housing production is needed to provide supply of rental apartments, townhomes, condominiums, ADU’s and detached single family homes to help meet the needs of residents moving through the housing continuum. •Market Rate housing includes the concept of "missing middle" housing CONTRAINTS: •Cost and Availability: land; financing, construction •Zoning regulations and policies •Process constraints 10 Market Rate Housing Existing and Continuing Opportunities 11 Incentives to “Missing Middle” housing a.Density Bonus Law implementation provide incentives for smaller units as higher densities are achieved for infill lots. b.The inclusionary housing in-lieu fee is based on square footage. As a result, smaller units have lower fees, which incentivise smaller infill development. c.The Downtown Flexible Density Program developed through the State SB2 Grant programs removes density requirements for units less than 600 s.f. downtown. d.Ministerial review and reduced fees for ADUs and JADUs; e.The City utilizes a tiered fee structure that provides substantial reductions in cost for smaller residential units for water, sewer and transportation impact fees; f.Minimum density allowances for residential districts: R-1=1 density unit; R-2 = 2 density units; R-3 = 3 density units; R-4 = 4 density units. g.Fractional density allowances based on unit size and number of bedrooms which allows more units (studios and 1-bedrooms less than 600 s.f. = 0.5 unit and 1-bedrooms less than 100 s.f. = .66 unit; h.Subdivision ordinance update that allows flexible lot design for R-1 districts. i.Updated Tiny Homes on Wheels Regulations; and j.Implementation of SB 9 (California H.O.M.E Act) allowing for up to four houses on R-1 lots 12 Market Rate Housing Future Opportunities •Update Objective Design Standards to better address infill development with (SB9 and SB684) •Customized Pre-approved ADU for AB1332 •Zoning for small infill (SB10) Leverage new impactful state laws that create missing middle housing •Upper Monterey Special Focus Area •Mid-Higuera Planning Area Area Plan Amendments Preapproved plans for missing middle housing Incentives through permit processing for missing middle housing 13 Housing Continuum –Below Market Rate Housing 50 permitted units 2020- 2028 RHNA Cycle 379 permitted units 2020-2028 RHNA Cycle 14 BMR HOUSING NEED: RHNA Need/Progress = Meeting approximately 21% BMR units are a crucial housing type in the housing continuum as it provides vulnerable community members the ability to stay in the community. It also provides much needed affordable housing for those who work in the City of SLO. BMR HOUSING CONTRAINTS: Like Market Rate –with financing usually dependent on grant funding or other subsidies 14Below Market Rate Housing 15 Below Market Rate Housing Existing and Continuing Opportunities 1.Density Bonus Incentives (AB1287) ordinance update 2.Inclusionary Housing Ordinance 3.Long-term loan awards from the City’s Affordable Housing Fund 4.Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process (SB35) and (SB423) 5.Use of ARPA funds to leverage Anderson Hotel and Maxine Lewis Apartments 6.Upcoming –Expansion of Down Payment Assistance Programs 7.Further Development of City’s BMR Housing Administration 16 Below Market Rate Future Opportunities 1.Application and use of Prohousing Incentive Funds 2.Local Revenue Measures 3.Update Fee Deferral Loans for BMR projects 4.BMR housing on church properties (SB4) 5.Leverage City property to promote BMR housing and historic preservation –Waterman Village project 17 Housing Continuum 291 Beds/Units •170 Existing •121 In queue 18 Definition: Permanent housing in which housing assistance and supportive services are provided to assist households with at least one member with a disability in achieving housing stability. Need: Critical component for individuals with disabilities to transition out of homelessness and emergency shelters Examples: 1.Anderson Hotel – Housing Authority of SLO 2.Broad Street Place – People’s Self-Help Housing 3.151 beds operated at various Transitions-Mental Health Association locations Permanent Supportive Housing 19 Programs & Policies State Funding Opportunities a.Homekey –$19.4M award for Calle Joaquin Homekey project with PSHH b.Encampment Resolution Funding –SLO County Welcome Home Village project Zoning Ordinance (2021) a.Allow PSH by-right in all zones that allow residential or mixed-use Future Opportunities a.Collaboration with housing partners & SLO County b.Senate Bill 4 20 Housing Continuum 64 Beds/Units •12 Existing •52 In queue 21 Definition: Housing designed to provide homeless individuals and families with interim stability and support to successfully move to and maintain permanent housing. Need: Interim and rapid re-housing opportunities to facilitate the transition from homelessness or emergency shelter to permanent housing. Examples: 1.TMHA’s Adult Transitional Program (ATP) 2.5Cities Homeless Coalition’s Cabins For Change Transitional Housing 22 Welcome Home Village a.34 Interim Housing Units in the City of SLO Zoning Amendments a.Allowing Transitional Housing by-right in most zones Future Opportunities a.TMHA –Transitional housing for CARE Court referrals b.CAPSLO –Bezos Day 1 Families Fund Grant Programs & Policies 23 Housing Continuum 128 Shelter Beds 40 Warming Center Beds (40 Prado Homeless Services Center) 24 Definition: Temporary shelter for unhoused individuals that does not require participants to sign a lease or occupancy agreement. Need: Gateway to treatment, services, and housing opportunities. Example: •40 Prado Homeless Services Center Day Services Housing-Focused Shelter Program Night-by-Night Shelter Program Warming Center Overnight Safe Parking Emergency Shelters 25 Programs & Policies 40 Prado Homeless Services Center a.Operational Funding b.Strategic Planning & Capacity Building Overnight Safe Parking a.2013 Safe Parking Ordinance b.Expansion of 40 Prado Safe Parking Program c.Railroad Overnight Safe Parking Pilot Program d.Rotating Overnight Safe Parking Program Future Opportunities a.Regional Safe Parking Model b.Permanent Supportive and Transitional Housing Projects 26 Housing Continuum 385 Individuals (2022 PIT Count) 27 Definition: Individuals and families who lack fixed nighttime residence, including emergency shelter or places not meant for human habitation Need: 385 individuals experiencing sheltered and unsheltered homelessness (2022 PIT Count) People Experiencing Homelessness 28 Programs & Policies Homelessness Response Strategic Plan a.Regional Collaboration b.Communications c.Data d.Pilot Programs e.Funding Opportunities City-Funded Programs a.Mobile Crisis Unit (MCU) b.Community Action Team (CAT) c.Community Service Officers (CSO) 29 Comments Received Regarding Student Housing Impacts 1.Cal Poly Housing Future Plan includes increase on-campus housing commensurate with increased enrollment, adding 3,000 new beds in the first phase for fall of 2026. 2.Additionally, adding 33 ownership units at Slack and Grand for Faculty and Staff Housing with construction slated Nov. 2023-Jan. 2026. This is the second project for this program that currently includes nearly 70 units at Bella Montana at Santa Rosa St. and Highland Dr. 30 Study Session Questions 1.Are there housing types of interest to the City Council that could be pursued in next financial plan? 2.Are there housing types or programs not discussed that staff should look into? 3.Are there programs listed in Attachment F that staff should explore for future work programs for the next financial plan cycle,in balance with competing needs? 31 Recommendation Receive presentation and conduct a study session on current status of the City’s housing continuum,including options to increase and diversify housing supply in the City. 32 Extra Slides 32 33 Table 2A •Table 2A was repealed when the Council adopted the IHO on July 19, 2022. •Table 2A was established to encourage projects with higher density and smaller units sizes to be sold or rented to households that meet moderate or lower-income standards. •This concept did not produce affordable housing in practice. •The feasibility analysis that the adopted IHO was based on indicated that development would be financially feasible with the current affordable housing percentage requirements. 34 Flexibility Density 34 1.Reduces density thresholds for qualifying units: limited to less than 600 sf in size (studio or one-bedroom configuration). 2.​​Prohibited on the ground floor. 3.Limited to the C-D or C-R zone within Downtown Core. 4.Reduced minimum parking requirements for qualifying units in the C-R zone (no changes in the C-D zone). DROP Program available. 5.Qualifying units exempt from Inclusionary Housing Requirements as an incentive. 6.Program is not available in conjunction with Density Bonus projects. 7.Expires on January 1, 2029, or until 500 new residential units are entitled or permitted, whichever occurs first. 8.No changes to the Development Review process. 9.No changes to development standards such as Building Height, Floor Area Ratio, Setbacks, lot coverage, etc. 35 Streamlining •The City has amended its Zoning Ordinance and permitting practices to allow more projects to be eligible for ministerial review and shorter processing time as follows: •Established new section to exempt specific housing projects from discretionary review (17.106.020.C); •Streamlined Discretionary Review for Housing Projects less than 49 units (17.106.030); and •Implemented E-review processes to allow digital permit and plan submittal and review. This will improve transparency and intended to streamline existing permitting processes. 36 Mobile Home Parks 1.No permitting authority –it lies with the State 2.City can designate where they are allowed, for SLO they are allowed in R-1 –R-4 districts. 37 Current and Upcoming Housing Work Efforts •Margarita Specific Plan Update –consider more housing options of all types. (In Process -RFP on Council agenda 4/2) •Airport Area Specific Plan Update –consider allowing mixed-use development in the C-S and M zones where appropriate. (In Process) •Parking Study –consider best practices that support housing production. (In Process –Funding will be considered in the FP Supplement) •Upper Monterey Special Focus Area –Confirm scope in pursuing an area plan consistent with LUE Policy 8.2.2. (Fall 2024) 38 SB 684 SB 684 (Sen. Anna Caballero) –Ministerial Approval of Up to 10- Unit Housing Projects on Small Sites effective July 1, 2024. a.CEQA-exempt ministerial approval for up to 10 units of housing on qualifying multifamily infill sites of no more than 5 acres and is surrounded by qualified urban uses, without labor standards or IHO requirements b.Includes subdivision for a housing development project that will result in 10 or fewer parcels and 10 or fewer units c.High-level analysis -could impact several hundred parcels based upon zoning, lot size, and developed parcels. 39 NOTES 1.Constraints –staircases AB 835 (Assembly Member Lee)– Fire Marshal to Study Safety of Requirement for Apartments to Have More than One Staircase.AB 835 requires the state fire marshal to analyze and report to the Legislature on standards for "single-exit,single stairway apartment houses." The report will assess "fire and life safety"issues with respect to the requirement to have more than one exit in apartment buildings with three or more stories and at least two dwelling units.Proponents of the bill contend that California's current requirement of two exits in certain apartment buildings limits the location and design of potential housing and contributes to California's ongoing housing crisis. 40 Council Agenda Report Attachments 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Attachment E 51 52 53 54 55 56