HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-18-2012 ac mund 1 sss1RECEIVE D
SEP 17 201 2
SLO CITY CLER K
Goodwin, Heathe r
From:
Grimes, Maev e
Sent
Monday, September 17, 2012 1 :14 P M
To:
Goodwin, Heathe r
Subject :
FW : Water Rate Structure Goal s
Attachments :
Water Rate Structure Goals Ranking .pd f
Agenda Correspondence for SS 1
Thanks .
9v(aeve .7Cennecdy Grimes
City Cler k
City of San Luis Obisp o
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-324 9
(805) 781-7102
From :Munds, Ro n
Sent :Monday, September 17, 2012 10 :28 AM
To:Grimes, Maeve
Cc : Mattingly, Carrie ; Horton, Wade ; Lichtig, Katie
Subject:Water Rate Structure Goal s
Councilmember Carter requested the water rate structure goals ranking sheets for all the counci l
members . I have scanned the sheets and attached them as a PDF to this email ; please forward t o
the City Council .
Information from ESET Endpoint Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7487 (20120917)
The message was checked by ESET Endpoint Antivirus .
http ://www.eset .com
Information from ESET Endpoint Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7488 (20120917 )
The message was checked by ESET Endpoint Antivirus .
http ://www .eset.com
AGENDA
CORRESPONDENC E
Date s I~Oz.Item#SS I
1
City of San Luis Obisp o
Rate Structure Evaluation Stud y
Please rate your top five rate design attributes in priority from 1 through 5, with 1 being you r
highest priority.
RATE DESIGN ATTRIBUTE S
Prioritizatio nRate Design Attribute
1 .Effectiveness in yielding total revenu erequirements.
(1— 5)
N/A
Comments
This Goal met for any rate design s
options developed as part of the revie w
2.Revenue stability and predictability .`d • ~/
3.Stability and predictability of the rate s
themselves.
/.
4.Discourage wasteful use, while promotingall justified types and amounts .
/
Y
lU"'
prese 5.Reflect al l
ternalities and
dt an dexteternaliti
e nature ) and
eof
providing
benefitsof providing sndingutility service .
.Aw*n.e-E!
p ~'fq.4415t-sc4-wr W°^'
6.Fair allocation of total cost of servic e
among the customer classes of service t oattain equity .H .V
/CGue,Qt,V A-•`'E
7 .Avoidance of undue discrimination in rat erelationships.et
/ct tvtt .'t-7/0'.-c.4
&Dynamic in its ability to respond t ochangingsupply and demand condition sand/or environmental concerns .
//~f,to.(/,e,-z-et—c~A
—o
9.Simple and easy to understand ; easy toadminister.3 3
10. Freedom from controversy as t oInterpretation.
c
n.h (4rpe 'der
City of San Luis Obisp o
Rate Structure Evaluation Stud y
Please rate your top five rate design attributes in priority from 1 through 5, with 1 being you r
highest priority .
RATE DESIGN ATTRIBUTE S
Prioritization
Rate Design Attribute
1 .Effectiveness in yielding total revenu e
requirements.
(1— 5)
N/A
Comments
This Goal will be met for any rate design s
options developed as part of the revie w
2.Revenue stability and predictability.~/V
lit
`fTNpu
Ct
Afb
lu.(d 5 (tr. i~b in (0
3.Stability and predictability of the rate s
themselves .
r L os hoa,..ari
0!O~Stuttg 5
4.Discourage wasteful use, while promotin g
all justified types and amounts .72 a •t6 as.r u c c
5.Reflect all present and future cost s(internalities and externalities) and benefit s
of providing utility service.
b 't1 •t-O L
Cn „pac +S
f—~”--rtWI.9 a al C.oc.+c +-'-
6.Fair allocation of total cost of servic e
among the customer classes of service t oattain equity .
~.ry.do .~-.,ti &f/
Itagar's Q 71'1"
7.Avoidance of undue discrimination in rat erelationships.,L
VIA
go+
St,bCo mac
*
CM Ss I
e
tw an e?qf
8 .Dynamic in its ability to respond to
changing supply and demand condition sand/or environmental concerns.
.gefpol4 to
(04,
u
LUe Ya`t —•o w'1
9 .Simple and easy to understand ; easy toadminister.CVt>~„Joar C1 ~t I to ,aL,`~
10 . Freedom from controversy as t ointerpretation.1(42*f,0'-p'e,/777
14 kcsas‘‘
ft t0
eas-ts
'de
c
City of San Luis Obisp o
Rate Structure Evaluation Study
Please rate your top five rate design attributes in priority from 1 through 5, with 1 being you r
highest priority .
RATE DESIGN ATTRIBUTE S
Rate Design Attribute
Frioritiza ion
(1- 5)Comment s
:••~regr`IIR mi cuts .asoa s®3
2 .Revenue stability and predictability .
3 .Stability and predictability of the rate s
themselves. , („~„j~ups
d'~N€.
4 Co MM•3 ei--
1 4.Discourage wasteful use, while promotin g
all ju s~f}ied types and ounts .
5.Reflect all present and future costs 4
(laterualities and externalities) and benefit s
of providing utility service .~,y..t''t~t 4/1 /117 -a ~`„
/n i "~'o~ c ; a,,ti 41.
lM S/Y`e-~S /if
3r3r i'1'/ry eaC
Fair allocation of total cost of servic eamong the customer classes of service to
attain equity.
/may,U YI N'I
7 .Avoidance of undue discrimination in rate
relationships .
O+ Poi q tt% QSt.?
Of.Dynamic in ilb it to respond to
changing supply and demand condition s
and/or environmental
~c!!r_~,
/1 l i i f 1I;Pk ,..,.';r": r,e '
O Simple and easy to understand ; easy to
administer.+4 . ~~~~
10. Fr rem controversy as t o
lute lion.
c
Lis
to\~YIl Nv
c
V~_
City of San this Obisp o
Rate Structure Evaluation Stud y
1r i
Please rate your top five rate design attributes in priority from 1 through 5, with 1 being you r
highest priority.
Z
5 3
t
C
RATE DESIGN ATTRIBUTE S
Yriodnation
~~•/71,7~t//IA .9 % ' Attributey
1 .ectiveness in yielding total revenu euirements.
(1 --5)
N/A
Comments
This Goal will be met for any rate design soptions developed as part of the revie w
2 .Revenue stability sod predictability G ~,.t e4 c
3 .Stability and predictabifity of the ratesthemselves. ~~
P K Q1I —as \ —._
4.Diswnrage se, while promotingall justified types and amounts.
~t~~.Olx7U.~J .lth5.Reflect all present a n(internalitiea and externalities) and benefit sof providing utility service.n b'~o.3 f 1pt,~7 )7 't
6 .i allocation of total cost of servic ethethecu I. 0NNa-t it
J
7
r tifl ~lamongcustomer classes of service t oattainSWOP`~~Lt C
E
•}..•~tJ ,
7 .Avoidance of in rate ,^A 1irelationships.2 1
Gib y pa 4S~Jt.8 .D n its ability to respon dchanging anging supply andand deman d nd condition sand/or environmental concerns .C am,
~~ei 4
N _
~Zi fO_--{}
c~z.,c
9.Simple and easy to understand ; easy toadminister.I Iyl-It O.aS2,%e.t.a
10. Freedom from controversy as to
~
~~~interpretation .
ca\ Zy
5
55
04
c e 001//// 3E5
City of San Luis Obisp o
Rate Structure Evaluation Study
Please rate your top five rate design attributes in priority from 1 through 5, with 1 being you r
highest priority .
RATE DESIGN ATTRIBUTE S
Rate Design Attribut e
1.Effectiveness in yielding total revenu e
requirements.`
t
PrioritfzaUon
(1- 5)
N/A
Comments
This Goal will be met for any rate designs
options developed as part of the revie w
2 .Revenue stability and predictability .
4/fI.4 vt7.t 4w~'A'4-r..AM .i ~ A's slo t~4+r,7/-e-at
3 .Stability and predictability of the rate s
themselves..
v-,4--* fn-a ., o(d 3
,
,~'`,r
\Id ral-e- 5 (010 yr .A
/' 4 .Discourage wasteful use, while promoting Cu,/3a~, cv-t-A,.r a I , 7~.
f—L u t .49—V\ SQsall justified t apes and amounts.7
5. Reflect all present s
(internalitles and externalities) and benefits
of providing utility service .
A+k 4-~+t-K- C D5 is C
~(t~.. t t ))fr, ow y2
6._girrallocation of total cost of service
among the customer classes of service t o
attain equity .3
\\1.Avoids= of undue gi6Criminatlon in rat r~2.4 it I rvtcc/Y~/ Co .
r (4 ;#.t`•x cC pettc .a-(
,F-Adrel$onsh ps
8.Dynamic in its ability to respond to
changing supply and demand condition s
and/or environmental concerns .43)
s u s4-os,.i J•scsz c
Pro-k S~C L
/ 9 .Simple and easy to understand ; easy to
administer. Q, 5 4 (~
1 (
I 10. Freedom from controversy as t o
interpretation.
a.'.A c1
~..,n g v ^rte I \ o -rr0-
54,42(4 - 0 . 5( Ls/ Ci M z~ v.^^ re &_Ne)wtt orw m
1
CC7/r )
c (~1~;111 a l L 5eCC ~NeS — 6 (A_cmQ Cpl) Fvu e-r `~/I `ce.,> C a *--f
/ A6-, ra .(c &L. 47-,.- tft..s - 1 - --'91-/d