The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-16-1981 & 11-20-1982 revise CPAC recommendations (may be minutes?)November 16, 1981 rt SUBJECT: Parking District Commission (PDC) : Recommendation C -PAC recommends that the following items be included in i 4 the description Of a Parking District Commission (PDC) to be established by Resolution of the City Council at the time of the adoption of the Parking Project: 1. DURATION OFPDC: for the life of the Bond Is , � sue. 2• AREA OF AUTHORITY: to include all Parking Structures, all Parking Lots and all Parking Spaces within the District. 3. 'MEMBERSHIP: ` a. NUMBER: a minimum of 7 Voting Members, = ` r>. v b. COMPOSITION: representing all parties financially y F il involved with r Projects r f t one City Hall Staff one Consumer - Civilian I As„i 1 4,r tf` V one Parking District Merchant four Parking District Property Owners r ( plus one voting -City Council c_ C. METHOD OF SELECTION: the choice of members to be the privilege r :4 of each of the named categories. 4. AUTHORITY: to have access to all information involving the Parking district, including Income and Expenses. F S. DUTIES: N 1* R a. to watch and check on all phases of Operation r of the Parking District - b, suggest changes involving Income Expenses I and c. examine Changes proposed by City Council and make Recommendations before a final City Council decision is made.-~` +k Parking District Commission November 16, 1981 ' - Page Two d. cause to be published a public ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT and also periodic (at least annually) PARKING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT STATUS, - ,n. t, REPORTS and to have this communicated to the City Council .and J t Asses: Property Owners y, r � N e. review and make recommendations regarding additional measures 4iJ1' 4 t t,1r .epplacable to solving Downtown, Parkin g;Problems;`�including �- '�F;/ (1) Shuttle Bus System Parking Lying Outside of the Central District Y `,(3) '9USL Transit System (.4) "Expansion bf'Pahking:Spaces ,. f. review: and make recommendations in regard to {l) Factors influencing revenue (example'- change In number, of parking meters) - ` (2) Usage Changes (example - residential to comrerc9al) (3) Complaints f N .. ... 6 ;P.ROTECTION-AGAINST DECREASE OF AUTHORITY AND DUTIES tFiet the POC ;be } changes imposed it ! ~' 4Jv protected.frOm on by future.Ci:y Council actions, that w31l.change its' authority and duties. J c Recommendation C -PAC recommends that the following items be included in the description of a Parking District Commission (POC) to be established by Resolution of the City Council at the time the of adoption of the Parking Project: 1. DURATION OF PDC: for the life of the Bond Issue, te. 2. AREA OF AUTHORITY: to include all Parking Structures, all Parking Lots and all Parking Spaces within the District. 3. MEMBERSHIP: a. NUMBER: a minimum of 7 Voting Members. b. COMPOSITION: representing all parties financially involved with. Projects ,�:" one City Hall Staff n4" one Consumer Civilian one Parking District Merchant four Parking District Property Owners plus one voting,- City Council C. METHOD OF SELECTION: the choice of members to be the privilege of each of the named categories. 4. AUTHORITY: to have access to all information Involving the Parking:, district, including Income and E xPenses. A S. DUTIES: a. to watch and check on all phases of Operation of the Parking District b. suggest changes involving Income Expenses and t c. examine Changes proposed by City Council and make Recommendations before a final City Council decision is made. Rahnb Associates .1 t 'November 20. 1981 -IT'S DECISION 'Let's face some facts .. Our "Project" has bogged down. . 2. We have thoroughly responded to the task presented to and requested' r of us. t.' 3. Almost all of the conceivable a ' explored, s approaches to the l - some more than once. "Project" have been::. 4: The City Council is waiting for our recOM endations. 5. The, situation which resulted in the establishment of C-PACis not i getting better; conversely ,••„ _ a 6C The -Public eye is upon us, waiting for a "statement". r ,Z. As each day passes, the cost of resolving the issues increases v y 1• y:; r -.'`k NoW forsomestraight-forward questions ..... +utia x. Is-it?,feasible to•assume that we can change a "culture" ; people! away froin•.their love:.affair with the automobile? and lure ;Practical to consider more "bike riding" as an answerto the probleml ';' ? S' confrol.Of employee parking too big a problem for the ave"rage business :,yY�- owner io handle? is it a "practical" solution? Mill perimeter; parking work? Will utilized suff4cientl it be economically. feasible? Will it_ r r r Y to make an impact? ' ? Does it.make sense;aa.explore solutions centering around trams trolleys } 7- moving sidewalks and the like? ( 6 DO WE;:REC06NIZE THE RE,VITALIZAIJON OF DOWNTOWN INTENT OF THIS EXERCISE s f J SAN LUIS OBISPO AND .THE CREATIONEOF AT ORE < AREA THE AVER CONSUMERr sf t With fhgse`Lhobghts in mind, let's make same decisions, turn them over.; to the City Council, g respond to an work with them towards reaching Y questions the have a final decision research and _?mended. Y and let Lhem tarry the ball" as`wa`s originaljy i ' Tnother words, let's put our lues "out of business" anchor and find out if the or awhile, -,' City Council will r ue between the ge eral throw�out result in a ^project public and. an INFORMED.' at" (pardon the meta P ori . A �::,5 Revised SUBJECT: Parking District Commission (PDC) �rpf s -;Recommendation C4AC recommends that the following items be included to the aescri N w:P f' ofa;ParkingDistrict Commission (DDC) to be established by Resatution of �. ,� �1. ..' the Cit 'Council at the time of the.:ada tion of.the Parkin Pro eet: ,r 'a„ r[a. _5. x. Y,i_ P 4 c -- . 1 DURATION.OF:FDC: for Vielife of the Bond Issue. F. S 2 ARWOV AUTHORITP to include.. all Parking Structures,, al,iParking Lots-and,all.Parking .Spaces within the District. ..ri 3 .MEMRERSHiP_:. , r s3 r r ! a -' a NUMBER a'.minimum of 7`Voting-Members.ft* l4 D 'td*OSITION representtng�all:parties financially invol10 ved � , one City Hall. Staff one :Consumer --Civilian one `Parka ng Di stri ct'Mer•chant �-- :'i four -Parking DistHct.Property Owners f 4 plus one non voting - City Council c. METHOD OF SELECTION: - -the choice of members. to be the`;privilege of each of the named categories. - 4. AUTHORITY: to have access to all information Ynvolving theParkingT,_ ..�.•(;'Nn 5 �' Y , district, including Income and 'Expenses. 'I r _ •1 ` Jr • tii rt .. Fy 3h�� ",.°' 5. DUTIES: 3 a. to watch and check on all phases of Operation of the Parkt ng Di stet ct r d b. suggest changes involving Income and Expenses ,..., ' ° :)',y° •'µ c, examine Changes proposed by City Council and make Recommendations before a final City Council decision is rade.