HomeMy WebLinkAbout6763-6774RESOLUTION NO. 6774 (1990 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS-OBISPO
CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE
AND SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT (ER 46-89)
The Council of the City of San Luis Obispo resolves as
follows:
Findinas
1. The city has Published and made available for public review
.a draft environmental impact report (EIR) for the proposed
upgrade of its wastewater treatment plant.and.sewer line
replacement project, in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act And the city's Environmental
Impact Procedures and Guidelines.
2.. On March 6, 1950, the City Council conducted A public
heating on the EIR.
Actions
1. The Council determines that the.EIR is adequate, and hereby
certifies it provided that all the additions and corrections
listed below are made. A final EIR incorporating these
additions and corrections is to be published within 30 days.
2. The Council determines that the project may be approved
despite significant, unavoidable adverse impacts of (1)
noise exposure for residents dud to project construction and
(2) energy use for activated sludge Aeration, due to the
overriding- concern of meeting state water quality standards
for San Luis Obispo Creek.-
3. The Council determines that the status of impacts is:
A. Significant, unavoidable, long-term impact: energy use
for activated sludge aeration.
B. Significant, unavoidable, impact: act: noise
short -term
exposure for residents due to project construction.
C. Potentially significant impacts which will be reducdd
to acceptable levels through mitigation measures
recommended in the draft EIR: changes to wetland
habitat; harm to cultural resources; aesthetics.
,R6774
Resolution No. 6774 (1990 Series)
Wastewater treatment EIR
Page 2
D. Potential impacts found not to be significant, due to
absence in the area, minor effects, or features
incorporated in the project as proposed: topography;
land use, .population,. economics, and housing; geologic
stability and soils; climate; air quality; vegetation;
fish and wildlife; threatened or endangered species;
wild and scenic rivers;.groundwater; agr- icultural land;
coastal zone; flood plain; recreation; open space;
sensitive areas; transportation and circulation; public
services; public safety (toxic hazards).
This listing of impact status will be included in the final
EIR summary.
4. Comments and responses, as fully set out in the attached in
Exhibit A, will be included in the final EIR.
5. other changes, as fully set out in the attached in Exhibit
`f
B, will be included in theinal EI.R.
6. The Council hereby adopts the following mitigation measures
and monitoring:
A. Creation of four -acre ponds near San Luis Obispo Creek,
as described on page 30 of the draft EIR and item 6 of
Exhibit A, within two years of completing the treatment
plant upgrade (unit 4);
B. Recognition and protectiori-of cultural resources, as
described on
page 32 of the draft EIR;
C. Planting to screen the cooling towers and above- ground
tanks for filtering, as described on page 34 of the
draft EIR;.
D. Limits on times for construction,-as described under
"Noise" in Exhibit.A.
A summary of these measures and monitoring will be included
in the summary of the final EIR.
Resolution No. 6774 (1990 Series)
Wastewater treatment EIR
Page 3
On motion of Councilwoman Rap p�aseconded by Councilman Reiss,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: CouncilTembers Rappa, Reiss, Pinard, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution as passed and adopted this 6th
day of March - 1990.
Ron Dunin
ATTEST•
�-►-�. • UIA
City Clerk Pam V es
APPROVED:
city Administrative
N
ector
Utilities Director
gmD.: eir- res.wp
��� � �
�`�` �
,,
it
':r •'
,�.
EXHIBIT A
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
Following are written comments received during the public review period. The
numbers of comments and responses correspond to numbers noted on the following
letters.
1. S. L. O. County Air Pollution Control District
Comment: Significant air quality impacts are unlikely.
Response: None required.
2. S. L. O. County Environmental Coordinator
Comments Further environmental review will be required if any of the rejected
treatment /disposal options are considered in the future,
Response: The city will conduct another environmental review of any proposal
to divert effluent from San Luis Obispo Creek. The final EIR will
acknowledge this.
3. State Water Resources Control Board
Comment: Include a list of potentially significant effects and adopted_
mitigation measures in the summary of the final EIR.
Response: The discussion on page 4 of the draft will be expanded to do so.
4. State Water Resources Control Board
Comment: A final mitigation plan and monitoring program adopted by the
City Council must be submitted.
Response: It will be included in the final EIR.
5. State Water Resources Control Board
Comment: If the city decides to divert effluent for irrigation or other uses, the
city should notify the Division of Water Rights to determine if any downstream
water rights holders would be injured.
Response.: The city will do so. However, the city's position is that downstream
users have no legal claim to the effluent since, except during winter peak storm
flows, nearly all of it comes from watersheds other than San Luis Obispo
Creek, and the rest comes from groundwater. The city may attempt to
negotiate agreements with downstream water users who have become
dependent on stream flow levels reflecting effluent disposal, so they would
receive the benefits of stream disposal in exchange for open space protection,
including helping to protect stream habitat from the effects of livestock.
6. State Department of Fish and Game
Comment; The change in operation for the existing ponds at the south end of
the plant has a potential for significant loss of open water habitat where such
habitat is at a premium. Wetland creation should be made a part of this
project.
Response: The city believes that its management of Laguna Lake results in
their being more open water habitat than before European settlement, at least
in the immediate area. The draft EIR (pages 29 and 30) discusses the
potential for creation of pond habitat near the treatment plant. City planning
staff recommends that the supplemental pond habitat be created within two
years of completion of the treatment plant upgrade. Facilities to divert treated
effluent to the new pond should be included in the project plans. If the City
Council agrees to this mitigation, it will be included in the final E.M.
7. State Department of Fish and Game
Comment: There are significant benefits to fish and wildlife from discharging
well- treated effluent to the creek. If diversion of effluent for other uses is
considered, habitat impacts must be identified and mitigation implemented.
Response: The city agrees. The city has asked the Department of Fish and
Game for a recommendation on the amount of effluent which should be
discharged to the creek, throughout the year and under various natural runoff
conditions, to adequately protect the .habitat.
8. State Department of Fish and Game
Comment: New construction at the plant site should be well separated from
the creek banks, and grading should avoid silt eroding into the creek.
Response: The rebuilt supernatant lagoon will about 20 feet from the westerly
creek bank, while all other work at the plant site will be at least 50 feet away..
The most substantial excavation (aeration tanks) will be farthest from the creek
(about 300 feet). Since the site is nearly flat and excess soil will be promptly
removed, the potential for erosion into the creek is minimal. If it appears that
drainage would carry silt to the creek, straw bales or other means to divert
flow or trap sediment will be used.
9. State Department of Fish and Game
Comment: Any activities which may affect creek banks or riparian vegetation
will require a streambed alteration agreement.
Response: None of the work at the treatment plant will affect creek banks.
Installing a new sewer main siphon between Lincoln and Santa Rosa streets
may require removal of some bedrock and a eucalyptus tree on the east side of
J �
Stenner Creek (draft EIR, pages 21 and 27). The city will obtain any needed
approvals from, and work within the limits set by, the Department of Fish and
Game.
10. Creekside Homeowners Association
Comment: Motors used to aerate the activated sludge process might cause a
noise problem. There should be a sound barrier screened with trees.
Response: The shortest distance from the new blowers to a mobile home will
be 850 feet. The shortest distances from other major noise sources, such as
South Hguera Street and Highway 101 traffic, are about 50 feet and 650 feet,
respectively. While the precise noise characteristics of the motors are not
known, they are believed to be comparable to the existing large, electric
powered motors_ at the treatment plant. The blowers forcing air into the
effluent will be somewhat noisier than motors simply forcing liquid through a
pipe. However, the sound of the blowers will not be discernible from, nor add,
perceptibly to, normally continuing background ( "ambient ") noise for those
living in the mobile home parks near the treatment plant, as stated on page 34
of the draft EIR. Depending on the angle of the straight -line path from the
new blowers to the residents, about 100 to 300 feet of riparian trees, as well as
existing plant structures and mechanical noise sources, will continue to be
between the blowers and the closest residents of a mobile home park. No
additional mitigation is necessary.
11. Creekside Homeowners Association
Comment: The height of the plant is a concern.
Response: None of the new facilities will be visible to residents of the mobile
home parks. The previously reviewed and approved, single -story electrical
switchgear building will be screened by a band, of riparian trees at least 100
feet wide. The new cooling towers will be no taller than about twelve feet,
and likewise will be screened. Some of the concern about height is probably
due to the term "cooling towers," which brings images of towers used at power
plants. The proposed structures are more like the evaporative coolers installed
on the tops of some buildings in hot, dry climates, only they will be placed on
the ground. Also, the small-scale pilot plant included test facilities which were
taller than they were wide, appearing tower -like. These items will not be
higher in the full-scale plant. The full-scale facilities will increase in width and
length, but not height. (The depth of the filter media determines its
effectiveness, while its horizontal area determines the amount of effluent which
can pass through it in a given period
The following agencies acknowledged receiving this draft or the previous draft EIR,
but made no comments other than to confirm that no permits or further review was
necessary:
E. C. Fullerton, Regional Director
National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (National Marine Fisheries)
Terminal Island, California
James Johnson, Area Manager
California Coastal Commission
Santa Barbara, California
David Nunenkamp, Deputy Director
State Office of Planning and Research
Sacramento, California
"Notices of Preparation" and draft EIRs were sent to the foll owing agencies, and no
response was received:
S. L O. County Council of Governments
San Luis Obispo, California
National Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Golden, Colorado
District Engineer, Division of Ecological Services
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Sacramento, California
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento District
Sacramento, Califorriia
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, Construction Grants Branch
San Francisco, California
Federal Emergency Management Agency
San Francisco, California'
State Conservationist
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service
Davis, California
Land Use Planning Office
U.S. Forest Service
San Francisco, California
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region
San Luis Obispo, California
i
After close of the public review period, discussions with the Public Works Department
and the Fire Department revealed that the following material should be added to the
EIR, including additions or changes to previously recommended mitigation.
Noise (page 34)
[Add the following discussion:]
To avoid major disruptions to normal traffic flow, pipeline replacement at some
intersections was proposed to occur at night. Work schedules which would minimize
detours during heavy traffic times on segments of state highways 1 and 227 were
proposed. These locations are:
South Street at Beebee Street, where work was proposed to occur from 9 a.m.
to 3 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m., with some road lanes remaining open
during the work. The 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. work period has been rejected since it
would expose residents of the nearby mobile home park and apartments to
unacceptable noise levels. This intersection will be affected for four or five
days.
Higuera Street at Nipomo Street, which would be closed completely from 6
p.m. to 8 a.m., excluding Thursday night, for about three nights. The noise
exposure for nearby residents, especially on Dana Street, will be undesirable..
However, this exposure is seen as an acceptable tradeoff to the traffic
congestion, added air pollution, and added daytime noise exposure from
detoured traffic along residential streets which would result from daytime
intersection closure.
Santa Rosa Street at Montalban Street, which would be reduced to one lane in
each direction from 7:00 p.m. to about 6:30 a.m. The undesirable nighttime
noise effects .are seen as an acceptable tradeoff to the substantially greater
daytime traffic congestion and safety hazards which would result from
constraining or rerouting Santa Rosa Street traffic around blocks which serve as
freeway access. This intersection would be affected for three nights.
[Change the recommended mitigation to read:]
Mitigation: Except for the night work to avoid daytime intersection closures
described above and emergencies (such as broken pipes), construction
activities will be limited to Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00
p.m (They will typically be from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.). Mufflers will
be kept in proper condition.
1
D
Transportation and Circulation (page 37)
[Add the following reference.]
See also the discussion of intersection closures and noise exposure discussed under
"Noise" above.
Public Safety (page 37)
[Substitute the following for the discussion of airborne hazards.]
The treatment plant will continue to use chlorine gas for disinfection of the effluent,
and sulfur dioxide gas to dechlorinate the effluent just before it is discharged. Use of
these gases poses a risk to residential areas near to and downwind from the treatment
plant. In April 1989, the city Fire Department identified several deficiencies in the
city's facilities and procedures for handling these toxic gases, and in dealing with other
emergencies at the treatment plant. The status of these deficiencies is:
1. Problem: Chlorine leak - detection equipment notifies plant standby
personnel, not the Fire Department, possibly causing a significant delay
in needed emergency response. Also, the monitor at the north chlorine
station may not properly detect a leak.
Response: In July 1989, newly installed chlorine and sulfur dioxide leak -
detection and notification equipment was functional, employing city
telemetry, a private alarm company, and the city fire and police dispatch
center.
2. Problem: A water spray would be critical in stopping or reducing a
toxic chlorine cloud, but no hydrants are available within a usable
distance.
Response: Water lines and hydrants will be installed as part of the unit
4 upgrade.
3. Problem: Fire access roads within the plant site are not the required
20 -foot width, which is a particular concern near the proposed caustic
soda storage area.
Response: Proper access roads will be completed as part of the unit 3
upgrade.
4. Problem: Chlorine and sulfur dioxide tanks ate not properly secured to
prevent movement and damage during an earthquake.
Response: The tanks have been secured.
C
5. Problem: Chlorine tanks at the north chlorine station are expo_ sed and
subject to vandalism
Response: The chlorine shed will be replaced as part of the unit 4
upgrade.
6. Problem: If the wooden shed covering the north chlorine tanks caught
fire, the heat would melt the release plugs, causing a toxic cloud.
Response: The chlorine shed will be replaced 8 part of the unit 4
upgrade.
7. Problem: The state - required emergency response plan for the treatment
plant has not been completed.
Response: Staff plans to contract for preparation of the plan.
8. Problem: The (existing) south chlorine station is critically close to a
residential area. Prevailing winds are toward the residences. A leak
from this location could kill several people.
Response: A secondary containment and scrubbing system for chlorine
and sulfur dioxide will be completed as part of the unit 4 upgrade.
The Utilities Department had previously indicated that chlorine safety items (2, 5, and
6 above) would be completed as part of unit 3 improvements. Since unit 3 plans and
specifications are nearly complete, these items will be included in unit 4. Both units
will be completed about the same time, so inclusion in unit 4 will not delay
completion of the safety modifications.
In summary, the treatment plant upgrade will comply with the 1988 Uniform Fire
Code, which will make the plant safer than it is. No additional, discretionary
mitigation is required.
[Add to the discussion of waterborne hazards:]
There will be a minor increase in risks to public safety from use and transportation of
caustic soda, which will be used in the treatment process. The risk will be adequately
mitigated by secondary containment around the storage area, staff training and
procedures in normal use and accident response, and state and federal regulation of
transportation.
EXHIBIT B
Additional changes and additions for
wastewater treatment upgrade EIR
Page 26 of the.draft EIR discusses air quality impacts of
ozonation, which had been considered by not finally selected as a
treatment process. Ozonaton has been rejected, and chlorination
will be used instead. Chlorination at this stage is before, and
in addition to, the final chlorination which immediately precedes
discharge of the effluent. Using chlorine instead of ozone at
this point will increase the risks associated with handling
chlorine, but reduce energy used for ozonation.
���
�C
RESOLUTION NO. 6773 (1990 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, AND
AUTHORIZING CAO TO AWARD CONTRACT TO SUCCESSFUL BIDDER
WHEREAS, the removal of the storage building is necessary to provide access to a fuel
tank that is required by the State to be removed, and
WHEREAS, the relocation of the storage building to Fire Station #3 will provide needed
storage space at that station; and
WHEREAS, funding is available from the Underground Tank Removal Projects of the
Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from an EIR, and is not of sensitive or
exceptional community interest;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves the Plans
and Specifications for City Plan No. N -38X, "Metal Storage Building, Remove and Relocate from
Fire Station #1 to #3 "; directs staff to advertise for bids; and authorizes the CAO to award the
contract to the low bidder if bids are below the Engineer's Estimate.
On motion of Councilwoman Pinard, seconded by Councilman Reiss
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES. Councilmembers Pinard, Reiss, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: N o n e
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of March , 1990.
-0410000
OR Ron Dunin
ATTE
CITY ICLERK Pa Voges
R6773
Resolution No. 6773: (19 9.0 Series)
Page Two.
City E dneer
mdwl.wp /n38x -sr.wp
by
r-1
LA
J
0
U
RESOLUTION NO. 6772 (1990 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBI_SPO CHANGING SURCHARGE AND MARKUP FIGURES FOR
FORCE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE
MARSH STREET PARKING STRUCTURE
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has for many years
followed Caltrans practice and specifications, and
WHEREAS, current Caltrans practice and specifications for force
account work is to allow 27 % -38% surcharge and 33% markup, and
WHEREAS, City specifications for this contract called for use
of 1988 Caltrans Specifications but elsewhere in the
specifications listed contractor surcharge at 10% and markup at
15 %, and
WHEREAS, these inconsistencies have created a point of
contention between the contractor and the City, and
WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to be consistent and fair in
its dealings with contractors, and
WHEREAS, the issue can be clarified by a change to exclusive
use of Caltrans practice and specifications on this contract.
THEREFORE BE.IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo, that it is City intent to use Caltrans figures for
both surcharge and markup and that figures shown in Section 7A of
the specifications for this project are declared null and void.
On motion of Councilwoman Pinard , seconded by
Councilman Reiss , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Reiss, Rappa, Roalman and
Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed this 6th day of March ,
1990.
----n9XYOR RO_N_ DUNIN
ATTE T:
s
CIT ,CLERK PAMELA d7OGES
R6772
J
Resolution No. 6772 (1990 Series)
APPROVED:
City A !inistrative Officer
Public Works Director
surchres /dfr #20
c1JGJ
y= �.,rlL1��,- O
�L
RESOLUTION NO-6771 (1990 Series)
.A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DECLARING PROPERTY LISTED IN E_ XHI_BIT A
AS SURPLUS PROPERTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby declares that all items of personal property
listed in Exhibit A attached and incorporated herein by reference are surplus property.
SECTION 2. Disposal of the property shall be made by sale at auction, direct sale to
other local government agencies, or as unsalable "junk" in a manner to be determined by
the D_ irector of Finance.
Councilwoman_ Councilman
On motion of Pinard , seconded by Reiss.-_ and on the fol-
lowing roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Reiss, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted the 6th day of March
1990.
your Ron Dunin
-ATTEST :.
Q_i
JA,�>
-�Ciq kClerk J�
APPROVED:. u
City ministrative Officer
R6771
MEMORANDUM
February 8, 1990
TO: William C. Statler, Director of Finance
FROM Jim Gardiner, Chief of Police (ji,kAl'
SUB_ JECT:. Police Department Surplus Property
.I am requesting that the property listed below be transferred to another Department or
declared surplus by the City .Council and disposed of in a manner consistent with the City's
surplus property. policies. The property items listed below are either outdated; no longer
economically, feasible to maintain, or not required to support Department operations as
indicated.. Accordingly, the equipment listed has been replaced with more efficient and
economical. equipment."
Estimated Original Year
Value- Cost Purchased Description Justification
200 ** ** Yamaha Generator Not required to support
operations.
** This item was not purchased by the City.. It was put into city inventory after it was
seized in a drug case.
��� � �
� �p
��
RESOLUTION NO. 6770 (1990 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CONVEYING A 47%
INTEREST IN THE CITY - COUNTY LIBRARY TO THE
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, by
Resolution No. 6700, dated October 9, 1989, approved the Joint
Powers Agreement for ownership and operation of the City- County
Library, and
WHEREAS, as part of said agreement, it was agreed that the
City would convey a 47% interest in the City- County Library to the
County of San Luis Obispo,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the-City sign a quitclaim deed to the County
of San Luis Obispo (Exhibit "A"), conveying a 47% interest in the
City- County Library to the County of San Luis Obispo.
On motion of Councilwoman Pinard , seconded by Councilman
Reiss
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
, and on the following roll call vote:
Councilmember.s Pinard, Reiss, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
None
None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of
March
ATTE
City lerk Pam V es
1990.
ayor Ron Dunin
R6770
Resolution No. 6770 (1990 Series)
Page Two
APPROVED:
City A. _inistrative Officer
Ci
Community Dev4lbpment Director
��� �--�6 � � .
v ,� / /���°{{{
L
��-(,Ci�1 �.
.q`
�f
RECORDING REQUESTED BY'
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO.
CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED
THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal corporation, for good
and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, does hereby remise, release, and Quitclaim to the
County of San Luis Obispo forty -seven percent (47 %) of all that
real property .including buildings and associated improvements,
located in the City of San Luis. Obispo, San Luis Obispo County,
State of California, legally described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
It is hereby acknowledged that, pursuant to Resolution No.
6700 adopted by the City of San Luis Obispo on October, 9, 1989,
title to said real property shall be vested as follows: The City
of San Luis Obispo as to a fifty -three percent (53 %) fee interest
and the County of San Luis Obispo as to a forty -seven percent (47 %)
fee interest as tenants -in- common.
Executed on the day of 1990.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Attest:
Pam Voges, City Clerk
By
Mayor Ron Dunin
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California )
County of San Luis Obispo,) ss.
On this day of -- , 1990, before me, a notary
Public in and for the County of San Luis. Obispo, State of
California, personally appeared Ron Dunin, known to me to be the
Mayor of the City of San Luis Obispo of the County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California and to be the person who executed the
within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporat ion, and
acknowledged to me that such City of San Luis Obi
California, executed same. spo, State of
By:
Notary Public
Exhibit "I 1�1- 1-.1`
J PARCEL 1:
J
i
That portion of Block 18 of t
the City of San Luis Obispo
State of Callforn PO• In the County San LUIS . Obispo, In
as per A• Page 168 of Maps,edescrbad as follows: NayS1,�'1878 ClnIecok.
Beginning at the Intersection
Street with the Southwesterly line
In B shorn on Licensed Surve f the
°f OsosStreet Northwesterly line of Monterey
Ososce Northg36°20'f30�Wrds of Sur Meysrereco recorded March 29
Street 1950
Kest 174.84 e distance of 1206.28 feet. Southresterf Yd ICo^e to`
Inch feet; thence North ° thence
described in the most W 35 06' Kest 53 44
Jul the deed to Ai"SterlY corner of 37.7GSfeethto a 3/4
Y 9. 1953 In Book 71 Howson I a marrIa Parcel of land
r
deed N1n9 nt of 392CeffOff'cllealrRecordscOra ^c
9: then
4.00 }eettKe53 °36' East, 5678 f f the nd de,scrlrue point of
e I
West st of the existin set to a Point, said a In sale
said parallel with sa,ld val9 brick ..all; thence N Point being
pipe bet vi
1.50 35.88 feet North 36 °23'30^
brick wall fe to a 3/4 Inch
53 °39' East said raletreorth of the of t DIpe
feet to a Parallel veto extended Westerly. ex
5.77 twO - Inch b and fgot NorthesteriY; thence North
East fe.'t57o fatv0-1och by, °iri °Clnchtste; thence ce sa vaII, 2 93
feet to a cross a Point; thence Northhence North 4.5 °09'30^
on the N c'hIs -Iad In then 36
described �nhwasterly IIne of concrete walk, said dWe51, 49.25
Records, Sousaid deed,recrdedall "ock 18; thence ld croSS being
Block 18, a disc al on Book 716, Page 392 9 the lend
East, 15 distance of 90.05 feet toeaNOrthwesterly IIngOfflclal
feet
of land allot;,
byoSan Iluusgment esTerly of entered he 15rfooYSf strip
533 Court
51ne, pagea1582 0fm0nftf Ibei "9 recordedCSeptNO. 16422, (ancertl f lec
Jud
South 35 °06 t al. Records 1. P ember 7, 191 In
line a dirt Eest Parallel thence leavin Book
ante of 90 seer w.lth. the 9 said North
Assessor Parcel 02- 322 -19 tO the true last mentioned Wes
Pot of beglnnIng,
PARCEL 2:
That portion
the of Block i8
State of of San Luis Obl's of Tth CItY o} San L u I s Obls po
salGage 16810foMaPS, Is County Pot map hrecorded May Sln Luis Obispo, of f Y. described as f0llOvs. CO of tho County Recorder ROOf
Beginning at the Intersection
Street with the sollT of
Ith
are shorn °t the Northwesterly line In Book °n Llconsod of Osos Street, of Monterey
S, p Surveyors Ma as Sall s,r
thence NOrthg3665 of Records P recorded M acts
Ose' 36-20130-1 °} Surveys, rch 29, 1950
Street. ceeof alOn es •ecocds o} said County
beginning; thence distance 206..28sfeetS Outthesterly I.Ine °}
9
Inch pipe thence Point Point of beginnfn true Point
of
Doint be In thence Nor"th 53°36, 35 06' West 37 7E Teeth 53 °441
9 4.00 feet West East 56,7 feet to a 3/4
3 /4th 36 h pIpe0„ W O.f the exIstIngtbrI bolnt, sal
exI North n9 bDIck valelld Paral
33. 88 alfeetthtoda Or
a
27.93 feet to East parallel alnldwere extended Westerly. IIno e
West 5.77 feet °-Inch b tw 0 feet North Y; thence
a tw .5
490453fe'etato 7.57efeet to °ahoblyctwo -inch stakes thence North
45
on th a cross chi Point; thence North North
e Nor soled In concrete ° th 36 °32'
said North Ilne of Block 18;..the e walk said west
feet tof rhalar00OD 2ntreet; tihenceOSouthsr6 '20130,,outhwestleO "g
Of 3 3o East 128.14
ASSeSSOr P 9 nn.l ng, 14
areal 02- 322 -19
RESOLUTION NO. 6769 (1990 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING SPECIFIC HERITAGE TREES
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Heritage Tree Program
for the City of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted the following
as Heritage Trees; and
1. Torrey Pine (Pinus torreyana), 1185 Foothill Blvd.
2. Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), 1303 Higuera Street
3. Cajeput Tree (Melaleuca leucadendron), 955 Pepper Street
4. Floss Silk Tree (Chorisia speciosa), 941 Chorro Street
5. Two (2) Victorian Box (Pittosporum undulatum) , 696 Monterey
Street
7. Saucer Magnolia (Magnolia soulangeana), 536 Marsh Street
8. Japanese Maple (Acer palmatum), 536 Marsh. Street
9. Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), 1185 Pacific Street
10. Western Redbud (Cercis Occidentalis), 1060 Pismo Street
11. Smooth Shell Macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia), 378 Grand
Avenue
12. Cork Oak (Quercus suber), 396 Lincoln Street
13. California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), 9 South Higuera
Street
14. Incense Cedar (Calocedrus decurrens), 1815 Monterey Street
15. Dawn Redwood (Metasequoia glyptostroboides), 237 Del Mar Court
16. Deodar Cedar (Cedrus deodara), 1190 Buchon Street
17. Red Horse Chestnut (Aesculus carnea), 1147 Pismo Street
.°.6769
Resolution,-' • 6769= (1990 Series)
Page 2
0
WHEREAS, the Tree Committee and staff has identified,. reviewed
and approved the following trees as Heritage Trees
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby approve the following
as Heritage Trees:
1. Evergreen Ash (Fraxinus uhdei), 1400 Osos Street
2. Olives (2) (Olea europaea), 1839 Conejo Avenue
3. Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), 94.1 Chorro Street
4. California Bay (Umbellularia californica), 855 Nipomo Street
On motion of Councilwoman Pinard , seconded by Councilman
Reiss , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Reiss, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of March,
1990.
YOR Ron Dunin
ATTES
CITY ICLERK PAMELA
Resolution 67:64, -(1990 Series)
Page 3
APPROVED:
City inistrative Officer
ca
t f///A t orn
Public Works Director
resolution.wp /arborday
F. - IT ,
,; -I, -- - C', ;, - '1 7 ..*
i •
RESOLUTION NO. 6763.(1990 `Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS;
AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, AND
AUTHORIZING CAO TO AWARD CONTRACT TO SUCCESSFUL BIDDER
WHEREAS, funds for improvement of minor storm drains are included in the 1989 -90
Financial Plan; and
WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from an EIR, and is not of sensitive or
exceptional community interest;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby approves the Plans
and Specifications for City Plan No. P -13E, "Storm Drain Improvement Project: Osos St. - Pismo
St. to Buchon St. "; directs staff to advertise for bids; and authorizes the CAO to award the
contract to the low bidder if bids are below the Engineer's Estimate.
On motion of Councilwoman Pinard , seconded by Councilman Reiss
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES. Councilmembers Pinard, Reiss, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT. None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this _ 6_ th_ day of March __ _ , 1990.
Ron Dunin
ATTEST.
,n f J
-
—'MY CLERK
APPR.AV DI3
City administrative Officer
Director
City Erpneer
tpg l .wp /p 13e- sr.ivp
R6768
�r9�i /, e.LJ
��:.
._ _�, !..
RESOLUTION NO. 6767 (1990 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, AND
AUTHORIZING CAO TO AWARD CONTRACT TO SUCCESSFUL BIDDER
WHERAS, funds for improvement of water mains are included in
the 1987 -89 Financial Plan; and
WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from an EIR,
and is not of sensitive or exceptional community interest;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby
approves the Plans and Specifications for "Water Main
Reconstruction Project: Buena Vista ( McCollum- Loomis); Santa
Ynez (Buena Vista -Santa Maria); and McCollum St. (Grand -
Henderson), City Plan Nos. N -18 -P, N -19P and N- 20P ",. directs
staff to advertise for bids; and authorizes the CAO to award the
contract to the low bidder if bids are below the Engineer's
Estimate.
On motion of Councilwoman Pinard .
seconded by Councilman Reiss
following roll call vote:
, and on the
AYES: Councilmembers, Pinard, Reiss, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day
of March , 1990.
YOR Ron Dunin
ATTEST• (J
4_,.�
CITY C RK Pam Ig es
R6767
Resolution No. 6767 (1990 Series)
Page Two.
APPROVED:
City Engineer
tpgl.wp /n20p -sr
by
�ji
�1
0
6766
RESOLUTION NO: ' 1990 SERIES
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AMENDING THE ANNUAL WATER OPERATIONAL PLAN
AND POLICY STATEMENT (Amends Resolution 465692)
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is desirous of a planning procedure. and .policy
statement regarding its water use, and,
WHEREAS, the adopted Annual Water Operational Plan and Policy Statement has
implemented a number of changes to better manage water, the most precious of all resources the City
of San Luis Obispo provides it citizens, and;
WHEREAS, the Water Action Levels monitor water resources and implement water
conservation measures.
NOW THEREFORE be it resolved that the City Council amends the Water Action Levels as
follows:
1. Redefine Minor Action Level as 3.0 years of supply, less annual well production plus the
minimum pool.
2. Retitle 250/b conservation level to Serious Action Level.
3. Add a 35% conservation level entitled Severe Action Level which is defined as 1.5 years of
supply, less well production plus the minimum pool.
4. Add the Exiting Action Levels as established.
5. Establish the recommended methodology for calculating the action levels using fixed annual
Water consumption. amounts.
On motion ofCOUncilwoman Rappa , seconded by Councilman .Reiss..:
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Cow7cilmembers Rapper, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Amin
NOES: Coumilwoam .Pinard
ABSENT: None.
February
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of _, 1990.
so -_tee o • a
AYOR RON DUNIN
ATTE
CITY 4ERK PAM- ESI
X766
Resolution No5766 (1990 Series)
APPROV
CITY AD INISTRATIVE OFFICER
The storage levels are based on a base year consumption of 8,050 AFY and then a reduced
consumption based on the appropriate conservation goal for each action level, 1,500 AFY of
well production and a minimum pool value of 3,100 AF.
Entering Action Levels are the levels at which the next more stringent conservation goal is
to be implemented as reservoir storage decreases.
Exiting Action Levels are the levels which the conservation goals are relaxed as reservoir
storage increases.
*Voluntary conservation, all others are mandatory.
ACTION LEVELS
City of San Luis Obispo
January 1990
Action Level
D fins ion
Storage
(AF)
Entering
Exiting
Action Levels
Action Levels
MAX STORAGE
Total City's storage in
both Salinas and Whale Rock
459630
Reservoirs
MINOR
3.0 years of supply less annual
well capacity plus minimum pool
22,800
259800
(5% conservation*)
MODERATE
2.5 years of supply less annual
well capacity plus minimum pool
189500
21,600
(15% conservation *)
SERIOUS
2.0 years of supply less annual
well capacity plus minimum pool
139800
16,500
(25% conservation)
SEVERE
1.5 years of supply less annual
well capacity plus minimum pool
10,000
12,200
(35% conservation)
CRITICAL
1.0 years of supply less annual
well capacity plus minimum pool
6,900
8,700
(50% conservation)
The storage levels are based on a base year consumption of 8,050 AFY and then a reduced
consumption based on the appropriate conservation goal for each action level, 1,500 AFY of
well production and a minimum pool value of 3,100 AF.
Entering Action Levels are the levels at which the next more stringent conservation goal is
to be implemented as reservoir storage decreases.
Exiting Action Levels are the levels which the conservation goals are relaxed as reservoir
storage increases.
*Voluntary conservation, all others are mandatory.
J
rLII
RESOLUTION NO.6765 (1990 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING OF A GRANT FROM
THE PLANNING /TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ALLOCATION OF
THE STATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has reviewed and hereby approves an
application for: Women's Shelter Program, Inc., Affordable Housing Development in the
amount of $30,000, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the citizen participation plan for
compliance with federal statute and has determined that this plan was followed for the
development of this application, including the execution of a grant agreement should the
application be funded, and
WHEREAS, the City Administrator is authorized and directed to act on the City's
behalf in all matters pertaining to this application.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby approves the
use of General Fund monies in the amount of $7,500 to be used as the City's cash match
as described in the application for this project (Exhibit A).
On motion of Cotmciluember Reiss seconded by comcllmember Pinard
and on the following role call vote
AWES: Camcilmembers Reiss, Pinard, Rappa, Roal= and Mayor Amin
NOES: N01e
ABSENT: None .
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of
Fe`bru'ary 1990
6765
Resolution No. 6765 101990 Series)
Page 2
MAYOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:. .
2�V
Ci Clerk Pam ges
APPROVED:
i
I ATTi 9! State of Calitorn�
A City of San Luis Obispo CDBG Prograi
(Applicant.)
PLANNING7ECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ALLOCAT ION
APPLICATION SUMMARY FORM Pa$e _, 01
la. APPLICANT: (XJ City [) Counry of San Luis Obispo -_
b. Department
c. Street/P.O. Box P.O. Box 8100 -
Citv San Luis Obispo Zip 93403_8100
d. Applicant's Staff Contact Person. Alison Lloyd
f. Phone (805) 549 -71.80
g. Consultant /Other Public Agency
Contact Person Scott Smith -_
Peoples' Self -Help Housing
h. Address 11545 Los Osos Valley Road
San.Luis Obispo, CA 93401
i. Phone (805) 544 -5717
e. Title Administrative Analyst
2, TYPE OF APPLICATION:
a. (Xj On Applicant's Own Behalf
b. (J Joint Application:
and
e. (J For Funding from the Economic
Development Planning/7eehnical
Assistance AJlocat.ion: -
c. O On Applicant's Own Behalf and on Behalf f. X For Funding from the General
of ( j
— Planning/Technical Assistance
d. f 1 On Behalf of Only Allocation:
z. LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVES:
Member of the Assembly
a. District Number 29 _
b. Name Eric Seastrand
C. Address ;2.1 Hipera. St_
d. City San Luis Obispo
District Number.
Name
Address
City
State. Senator
District Number 14
Name Ken Maddy
Address 895 Nana
C i t v Morrp�ay
District Number
Name
Address
City
1 -3
Member of COnb
District Number 16
Name Leon - Panetta _.
Address 1160- Marsh St..
City tan - I uis nbispn_
District Number
Name
Address
City
J6
� 1
4. Activity Title:
Women's Shelter Study
Amount Requested: $30,000
Amount of Cash Match
by Applicant: g7,S00
Note: Amount requested may not exceed $30,000. Refer to the General Provisions Section to
determine minimum cash match required.
a. APPLICATION CHECKLIST
(�
Application Summary Form
K
Activity Description Form
9(J
Activity Budget and Schedule Form
n
Statement of Assurances
b. ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution by Governing Body
(]
Letters Received and Responses
",
Approving Application
(if applicable)
(�
Letter or Resolution Documenting
(J
Joint Powers Agreement
Cash Match Contribution
(if applicable)
(J
Additional Data (if applicable)
DQ
Letters of Intent or Commitment
(if applicable)
66: Has applicant enacted limitations on residential construction (J no ( X] yes
which are not establishing agricultural preserves, not imposed
by another agency, or not based on a health and safety threat'?
b, If the answer to 6a is ves, is the housing element approved by (J no (XJ yes
the Department?
C. If the answer to 6b is no, is the application for low income (] no (j yes
housing?
7, OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO SUBMIT APPLICATIO,�:
N
John Dunn Title City Administrative Officer
a m e
(Print)
Siumitur
Date 2 f V
I -4
State of California
City- of San Luis Obispo_ CDBG Program
(Applicants)
PLANMNGfI'ECHNICAL -ASSISTANCE ALLOCATIONS
ACTH TY DESCRIPTION FORM
Attach one form for each activity.
Page _ of
1. Activity Title; 1. HTTOra inq nuuD)iII¢I uCVC IUUIIICIIt 1M9 V1 cu �i
2.Housing Element Update (Portions addressing TIG Housing)
2. CDBG funds requested'for this activity: $ 30.000- - -
3. Describe how the objective of principally benefitting the TIG will be
met by this activity. See the program Objective Section of this RFP
for the definition of national objective as it applies to a Planning /
Technical Assistance Activity.
See Attached
3a. Total number of households to benefit: 1., 100
2. - -120
3b. Total number of households in Targeted Income Group to benefit:
1. 100
2. 120
3c. Total number of households in lowest Targeted Income Group to
benefit: 1._ 50 _
2. 60
4. Anticipated environmental level.
Exempt from NEPA (CEQA is not applicable).
5. Identify other planning/technical _ assistance funds which wi.la be
committed to this activity during the grant period.
Amount Source
A. Federal $
B. Other State $
C. Local Cash Match $ 7,_500 City of San Luis Obispo
D. Private ?
TOTAL $ 1,500
11-3 p
3�O
6. Detailed Activity Description.
(Attach additional pages as needed
- SEE ATTACHED
II-4
�.9
U
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
(PLANNING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SET- ASIDE)
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
It is the intent of the City of San Luis Obispo to provide
residents the opportunity to participate in the development of
the City's 1990 Community Development Block Grant Program. The
City particularly encourages the participation of low- and
moderate- income persons who are residents of areas in which CDBG
funds are proposed to be used. To facilitate public participa-
tion, there will be a minimum of one public meeting and one
public hearing prior to the submission of any application.
Through public notices, written comment will be encouraged. In
addition, there will be a public information file available for
citizen inspection at City Hall.
1. Citizen Participation File: The file will include a copy of
the application, all public notices, written comments and
responses, and copies of State regulations pertinent to the
application. If the program is funded, performance reports
will also be included in the file. The location of this
file will be included in all public notices.
2. Written Comment: Public comment, including written.comment,
will be encouraged. Ail written comments will be responded
to in writing and copies of this correspondence will be kept
in the Public Participation File. Any written complaints
will be responded to within 15 working days where
practicable.
3. Public Meetings and Hearings:
a. Public Notice: All public meetings and hearings held as
part of the 1990 CDBG Program will be advertised, at a
minimum, in the local newspaper, the Telegram- Tribune.
b. Public Meetings: At least one public meeting will. be
held during the program design and application prepara-
tion phase for the City's 1990 CDBG application. The
initial public meeting will include the provision of
information about CDBG funds available, national
objectives, competitive rating factors and application
time frames.
A public meeting will be held to consider any annual
grantee performance or close -out reports as required by
Section 7110 of Title 25 of the California Government
Code.
C. Public Hearings:—At least one public hearing will be
held by the City Council to approve and authorize
submittal to the State of California the completed 1990
CDBG application.
3 -/O
r
u
Activity Description Form
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION FORM
City of San Luis Obispo
Page 1 of 8
3. Describe how the objective of principally benefiting the TIG
will be met by this activity. See the Program Objective
section of this RFP for the definition of national objective
as it applies to a Planning /Technical Assistance activity.
Activity l - Women's Shelter
The objective of principally benefiting TIG households will
be met because this activity directs CDBG funds towards the
planning of a project which, brought to completion, will
assist 100% low income households (households below 80% of
area median income).
Upon completion of the activity (needs assessment, site
inventory and feasibility analysis, site negotiation and low
interest loan /grant procurement for acquisition and /or
rehabilitation) all beneficiaries of the emergency as well
as transitional (second stage) housing shall be low income.
Historically, 100% of Women's Shelter residents have been
low income. 95% have been poverty level households (on or
eligible for AFDC) . This is due in part to residents
frequent dependence upon spousal income prior to the
physical and /or emotional abuse which resulted in their
need for alternative decent, affordable shelter. The
highest income documented during the previous year was
$17,000 for a two person household, which is equivalent to
65% of the area median income for that household size.
Activity 2 - Housing Element Update (Portions Addressing TIG
Housing Only)
The City's Housing Element is scheduled to be updated during
1991 - 1992. The cost of researching and preparing those
portions which address housing for households in the
Targeted Income Group (TIG) shall constitute the city's cash
match requirement under this CDBG application. The CDBG
objective of principal, -y benefiting TIG households shall be
met because in addition to identifying current TIG housing
issues, the Element develops and adopts detailed
Implementation Programs. These Implementation Programs
identify responsible departments or sponsoring agencies,
funding sources, quantified number of TIG
units /beneficiaries, and specific timetables for completion.
For example., the recently completed Poinsettia Street
Apartments (20 TIG units /1987 CDBG program) had its roots in
the Housing Element.
J-H
Detailed Activity Description City of San Luis Obispo
Page 2 of 8
6. Detailed Activity Description
(Attach additional pages as needed.)
Activity .1 - Women's Shelter
A. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM DESIGN
The purpose of the activity is to enable the Executive
Director, Board and Long Range. Planning Committee of the
Women's Shelter Program to work with a non - profit housing
consultant over an 14 to 24 month period toward accomplish-
ing the following goals: a) reducing the shelter's existing
overcrowding situation (an average of 15 women and children
per night share a 4- bedroom house; b) increasing the number
of women and children they provide housing to (last year 76
SLO households had to be referred to shelter outside the
city due to lack . of space), c) expanding their program to
include transitional (second stage) housing in addition to
the emergency housing they currently provide; and d)
purchasing a permanent site with low interest loans or
grants in order to reduce vulnerability to rent increases
and arbitrary lease conditions.
The City will enter into a CDBG grant agreement with Women's
Shelter Inc., as subrecipient. Women's Shelter Inc. will
solicit consulting services of a non - profit housing
corporation such as Peoples' Self -Help Housing Corporation
to conduct the majority of the activity, in coordination
with the Shelter's Executive Director and Long Range
Planning Committee.
The steps involved in t4i-is activity include:
1. Needs Assessment: The Consultant will complete an
assessment to establish the level and type of
residential services needed for battered women and
their children. This assessment will include
documentation of the existing need, projection of
future need, and evaluation of emergency versus
transitional housing needs.
2. Resources Assessment: The Consultant will evaluate the
availability of suitable financing mechanisms and grant
resources which might, separately or in tandem, enable
the Women's Shelter to purchase and /or rehabilitate
residential property. This will include a financial
analysis of the Women's Shelter operating budget and
borrowing capacity.
3- /a
Activity Description Form City of San Luis Obispo
Page 3 of 8
3. Existing Site Evaluation: The Consultant will complete
an assessment of the physical condition of the existing
site, including rehabilitation and additional
development potential, and evaluate the consequences of
continued occupancy on that site (financial impact,
overcrowding, unmet demand etc.).
4. Planning Review.—In consultation with the City, the
Consultant-will review local planning and zoning
ordinances which would potentially impact site
selection. This .would include an assessment of the
public review process and its effect upon the desired
site anonymity.
5. Preliminary Report: This report by the Consultant will
include: 1) an assessment of the level and type of
.housing need and a projection of future need; 2) the
feasibility, including a financial analysis, of
purchasing a site which meets the emergency as well as
transitional housing needs of the Women's Shelter; 3)
land use, zoning and other ordinances which would
encourage or inhibit the location of the Women's
Shelter; 4) recommendations for meeting the established
residential needs of the Women's Shelter, including
resource recommendations and preparation of development
pro formas.
6. Site Identification; The consultant will conduct a site
search for existing residential facilities with
significant potential. Important factors in site
identification will be security of the beneficiaries
and economic feasibility. An inventory of potential
properties will be prepared with an analysis of various
planning, security 'and financial issues evaluated for
each site. This inventory will be reviewed by Women's
Shelter Director and Board, and each will be rated
according to its potential. Owner(s) of the highest
rated properties will be researched and contacted
regarding sale. A long term option to purchase
agreement will be negotiated with the owner. During
.this option period, permanent grant- and /or low.interest
loan financing will be secured.
7. Application Preparation: at the direction of the City
and the Board of Directors of the Women's Shelter, the
Consultant will 'prepare appropriate applications for
funding from private and public resources, such as the
Community Development Block Grant or Emergency Shelter
Programs.
Activity Description Form City of San Luis Obispo
Page 4 of 8
B. DESCRIPTION OF BENEFICIARIES
The ,number of households potentially benefiting from this
activity is based upon the sum of city households sheltered
on -site last year, and the number of SLO households referred
to other shelters outside the city due to overcrowding.
As discussed above, the Women's Shelter provides emergency
housing to women and their children living in abusive
situations: In general women are referred to the program by
the police and sheriff's department, by the county's
Victim /Witness Assistance program, or by the local Hotline.
All households served in the last calendar year were
low - income: the highest verified annual .income'was $17,000
for a two person household, which is only 65% . of the area
median income for that-household size.
C. DESCRIPTION.OF OTHER ACTIVITIES
There is no other facility or program offering affordable
emergency or transitional housing to victims of domestic
violence in the city. The San Luis Obispo City Housing
Authority currently offers one of its apartments for
residents transitioning from the Shelter's emergency
housing. However this one apartment is substantially less
than the estimated need.
The City identifies the Women's Shelter in their General
Plan (Housing Element) as an important housing resource for
the community.
California Rural Legal Assistance, in coordination with the
Women's Shelter Program, recently began legal classes for
women orienting them to their rights and assisting them to
obtain restraining orders as necessary. Victim knowledge
and ability to obtain these restraining orders is viewed by
the Shelter'as a positive step toward reducing the incidence
of domestic violence.
D. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM
The battering of women is common: at least 1.8 million women
are battered every year. It is the single major cause of
injury to women, exceeding rapes, muggings and even auto
accidents. According to a 1982 study, more than one - million
women seek medical help for injuries caused by battering
each year; 20% of trauma room visits.by women are the result
of batter -ing.
3-/,�
9
Activity Description Form
City of San Luis Obispo
Page 5 of 8
Why not just leave? Fear. Fear of loss of income, loss of
shelter, loss of self- respect, fear of further abuse.
Domestic violence shelters offer abused and resource -poor
women an immediate alternative to abuse. Annually, more than
a half a million women and children seek the safety and
support of shelter programs. These programs offer shelter,
food, counseling, and safety. They offer the abused woman
the opportunity to regroup, to step out of a crisis
situation, evaluate her resources and plan for the future.
Locally, as nationally, the demand for services for battered
women and their families is increasing dramatically. In
1985 there were 14 reported instances of spousal abuse in
San Luis Obispo County. In 1988 there were 3161 a 2.3 -fold
increase over 1985. One- quarter of the victims served by the
Victim /Witness Assistance program are related to domestic
violence.
Resources to support these programs, however, are limited.
In some cases, such as the Emergency Shelter Program and
Federal Emergency Shelter Program, domestic violence
shelters and homeless shelters compete for the same limited
funds. Most available_ funds are limited to operational
expenses and do not permit capital acquisition.
Most importantly, the funding expended upon housing costs
(i.e., the lease), dramatically reduces operating income
available for counseling and the other intensive services
which are necessary to rebuild dysfunctional lives. The
Women's Shelter competes in a rental housing market
dominated by college students and urban immigrants. Rents
are astronomical and rising.
Although ideally situated, the existing facility is
expensive and inadequate. The facility is overcrowded,
housing an average of 15 women and children per night in a
four bedroom dwelling. Additionally, in 1989 the Shelter had
to direct 76 San Luis Obispo households (women and children)
to facilities outside the City (and, in many cases outside
the County) due to the inadequate size of their current
dwelling.
Besides needing a larger facility, the. Shelter needs to add
transitional housing to its Program. Funding sources limit
the maximum length of emergency stay, and frequently
residents are neither emotionally nor financially prepared
/S
Activity Description Form
City of San Luis Obispo
Page 6 of 8
for complete independence. The unfortunate result is that
many households see no alternative but to return to the
abusive situation from which they fled. The addition of
several supervised apartments would meet an important
housing need, and greatly enhance the effectiveness of the
Women's Shelter Program.
Expansion of their emergency housing component or the
addition of transitional housing must consider the
long- standing problem of site stability and disproportionate
use of operating funds for rental payments. The CDBG
activity will consider feasibility of purchasing a permanent
location utilizing low- interest loan and /or grant funds.
E. REASONABLENESS OF COSTS
Reasonableness of cost is documented with a letter from
People's Self -Help Housing Corporation, a local non - profit
housing and community development corporation. PSHHC's
letter estimates the cost and describes the basis for
arriving at this cost.
3 A�
F. PROPOSED TASKS /TIMEFRAME
Complete
1.
Award Announcement
April 9, 1990
2.
Fully Executed Grant Agreement (HCD /City)
July 11 19.90
3.
Local Contracts Executed.
(City /Women's Shelter,Shelter /PSHHC)
Aug. 1, 1990
4.
Environmental Review
Sept. 1, 1990
5.
CDBG Program Activity
Sept. 11 1991
Needs Assessment
Resources Assessment
Planning Review
Site ID and Evaluation
6.
Preliminary Report - analysis and
Presentation of data with recommendations
to the Women's Shelter Board and Long
Range Planning Committee
7.
Site Negotiation /Purchase Agreement
Sept. 11 1992
Preparation of Loan /Grant Applications
for Acquisition and /or Rehab
3 A�
i�
Activity Description Form City of San Luis Obispo
Page 7 of 8
G. FINAL PRODUCT
The final product of the Women's Shelter CDBG activity will be
negotiation of an Option to Purchase Agreement on a permanent
suitable site, and preparation of loan /grant applications for
acquisition and /or rehabilitation of the property.
Activity 2 - Housing Element Update (Portions addressing TIG
Housing Only)
Update of those portions of the City's Housing Element which
address TIG and special needs housing will be conducted primarily
by City staff. The timetable for accomplishing this work program
is during 1991 and 1992, with adoption by 1993.
Affordable housing sections in the existing Element which may
require update include: "Housing condition and Rehabilitation
Needs; Affordability; Obstacles to Production of Affordable:
Housing; Existing Subsidized Housing; Sites for Manufactured
Housing; Sites for Low and Moderate - Income Housing; Article 34
Authorization; Potential Loss of Low- and Moderate -cost Housing;
How the City Has .Helped Maintain Affordable Housing; How the City
Has Removed Obstacles to Production of Affordable Housing; and
Housing Organizations ".
Additionally, staff will translate the issues and data identified
in these various sections of the Housing Element into the Element's
Implementation Programs, which must also be updated. These
programs are affordable housing strategies which state specific
objectives, responsible departments or sponsoring agency,
quantified number of beneficiaries or housing units, realistic
means of funding or financing the program, and timeframe for
completing the program and realizing the objective. This meets the
CDBG program objective of principle benefit to TIG households
because if brought to completion, each Program will provide housing .
for persons in the targeted income group.
The number of beneficiaries resulting from this CDBG activity is
projected using data and goals quantified in the existing Element..
The sum of its various Programs totals at least 120 TIG units to
be completed during the Housing Element period, with an additional
1,440 low and very low- income units identified for inclusion in the
city's five major expansion areas upon build -out.
217
Activity Description Form
Cash Match /In -Kind Services
City of San Luis Obispo
Page 8 of 8
It is anticipated that the City will meet the $7,500. cash match
requirement through one or more of the following ways:
1. The amount of City Staff time or other resources expended on
activities directly in support of the Women's Shelter
Affordable Housing Development objective.
2. The amount of City Staff time or other resources expended to
update those portions of the Housing Element which address TIG
and special needs housing..
3. A cash contribution to cover the remaining balance if any,
should staff time or other resources allocated to the project
as outlined above be insufficient to meet all of the City's
$7,500 cash match requirement.
A special project account will be established at the City to
account for this match.
3 -18
r� G
r LL
u
7
L
[) C
VJ �
d
Q
r
Z 1
Z �
t 0
v�
Z �
r
0. N
7Ag
v
7
A
w
0
w
Q±
1�
C
0
a�
3 -rp
w
v
Or
-0
_OJ E<
V\I 41
L 61Q
O
a,
1
Io
N
rl
1
t
L 4) -,4.3
.
c �o
v N
4" 30�
Q ,
y
U
y:
C
EN
"�
iL G
0)
Z
a a
�
z
�?
G q
w
u
-+
v
N
E
�
O
A,
O
O
O
O
O rp C71
-0 c
C
O
O
t0
O
0) M,
V
M
w
7Ag
v
7
A
w
0
w
Q±
1�
C
0
a�
3 -rp
Or
-0
_OJ E<
V\I 41
L 61Q
4J N
m Q10
rl
C C•"
t
L 4) -,4.3
.
c �o
ND
4" 30�
Q ,
EN
"�
ro
0)
Z
>,
d v
z
�?
u
-+
cv
N
C U
O
Ln
a N
t0
4.
w
0
'^
N
o
°
°o
o
LM
0
rl
M
M
A
N
Ind
ro
w
,. L
rp
m
N
9
o
a
H
f]
0
47
w
7Ag
v
7
A
w
0
w
Q±
1�
C
0
a�
3 -rp
W
z
E
N
W
a
N
:,
I►'
a
iii -3
J-,. o
�'
CD
O
o
..
a
M
M
h
N
N
N
N
h
O
U)
O
N
O
N
v
N
M
O
O_
M
a.
N
N
01
�
h
N
N
N
N
0
O
Lr)
O
co
O
Z
r,
N
O
co
0
0
0
Vi
o
O
N
N
Ol
I lA
h
O
In
O
c
O
C�
N
r
M
N
M
a
='
N
N
N
r
N
C)
p
o
CL
Ln
O
Q
O�
h
n
O
^�
N
N
N
N
O
L
O
Ln
r`
r`
z
M
O
N
N
N
N
r
cn
h
I J�
N
N
Vf
fA
h
��c
CD
L
Q
0)
O
eu
i
m
H
m
r �'e� 2
=
>. c
5.z N Y
�, c z 0
zA ��
.. u C
- -W a.�
N C
c
g J, C • 4�.
c
a
J'
s" U f-
� F
L C a
7 a. U
7 U W
= a1
¢
o
X
0WLl
ass_
awo
iii -3
J-,. o
F
Page _ of —
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLACK GRANT PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF ASSURANCES
The City /rte of San Luis Obispo. hereby assures and certifies that:
(a) It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant and to execute the proposed
program.
(b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act or resolution,
motion, or similar action authorizing the filing of the application, including all
understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the
applicant's chief executive officer or other designee to act in connection with the
application and to provide such additional information as may be required.
(c) It has or will comply with all citizen participation requirements, including:
Preparation of a written citizen participation plan which includes, at
minimum, the following components:
a. Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular
emphasis on participation by per of low and moderate income who
are residents of slum and blight areas and of areas in which CDBG
funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of
residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods as defined by
the local jurisdiction;
b. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local meetings;
information, and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of
funds, as required by CDBG regulations, and relating to the actual use
of funds under this title;
C. Provides for technical assistance to groups representative of persons
of low and moderate income that request such assistance in developing
proposals with the level and type of assistance to be determined by
the grantee;
d. Provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to respond to
proposals and questions at all stages of the community development
program, including at least the development of needs, the review of
proposed activities, and review of program performance, which
hearings shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations
convenient to potential or actual. beneficiaries, and with
accommodation for the handicapped. This shall include one public
meeting during the program design, annual performance report
.preparation, and formal amendments. A public hearing shall be
conducted prior to application submittal;
e. Solicits and provides for a timely written answer to written complaints
and grievances, within 15 working days where practicable; and
f. Identifies how the needs of non - English speaking residents will be met
in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non-
English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate.
(d) Its CDBG Program has been developed so as to primarily benefit targeted .income
persons and households. _
(e) It consents to assume the responsibilities for environmental review and decision.
making in order to ensure compliance with NEPA by following the procedures for
"recipients" of block grant funds as set forth in 24 CFR, Part 58, entitled
"Environmental Review Procedures for Title I Community Development Block
Grant Programs." Also included in this requirement is compliance with Executive
Order 11988 relating to the evaluation of flood hazards, and Section 102(a) of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Pub. Law 93 -234) :regarding purchase of
flood insurance, and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 470)
and implementing regulations (36 CFR 800.8).
(f) It consents to assume t_he role of either "Lead Agency' as defined by Section 21067
of the California Public Resources Code, or if another agency is or will be
designated "Lead. Agency," it consents to assume the role of "Responsible Agency"
as defined by Section 21069 of the California Public Resources Code, in order to
ensure compliance with CEQA..
(g) If has resolved any audit findings or performance problems for prior CDBG grants
awarded by an urban county, by HUD under the Small Cities Program, or by the
State.
(h) It certifies that there is no plan, ordinance, or other measure in effect which directly
limits, by number, the building permits that may be issued for residential
construction or the buildable lots which may be developed for.residential purposes;
or if such a plan, ordinance, or measure is in effect, it will either be rescinded
before receiving funds, or it need not be rescinded because:
It imposes a moratorium on residential construction, to protect the health and
safety, for a specified period of time which will end when the public health
and safety is no longer jeopardized; or
2. It creates agricultural preserves under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section
51200) of Part 2 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code; or
3. It was adopted pursuant to a specific requirement of a state or multi -state
board, agency, department, or commission; or
4. The applicant has a housing element which the Department of Housing and
Community Development has found to be adequate, unless a final order has
been issued by a court in which the court determined that it is not in
compliance with Article 10.6 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the
Government Code; or
IV -2
. -?-.a
5
The use the funds applied for in
for the Targeted Income Group. this application is restricted for housing
_
It will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines, and requirements
circular Numbers A -87, A -128, A;102 and A•121, where appropriate, and the State
CDBG regulations. of OMB
(1) It shall comply with.the following regarding nondiscrimination:
1 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. Law 88.352).
2• Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub. Law 90.28
M11 administer all programs and activities related 4) as amended; and
to housing and community
development in a manner affirmatively furthering fair housing.
3• Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of
amended. 1974, as
4. Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968; as amended.
5• Executive Order 11248 amended b
' as y Executive Orders 11373 and 12086.
6• Executive Order 11063 as amended b
' y Executive Order 12259.
7. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. Law 93 -112), as
amended, and implementing regulations.
8. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Pub. Law 94 -135 .
9. The prospective contractor's signature affixed hereon and
constitute a certification under the penalty of er u under the laws of the
State of California tha dated shall
L.the bidder has, unless exempted, complied with the
nondiscrimination program requirements of Government Code Section 12990
and Title 2, California Administrative Code, Section 8103.
(k) It will comply with relocation, displacement, replacement housin and
acquisition policies and requirements applicable to the Communi
Bloch Grant Program. PP a real property
(I) It µill comply with the following regarding labor standards; ry Development
1• Section 110 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended.
2. Section 1720 et seq, of the California Labor Code regarding public works
labor standards.
3• Davis -Bacon Act as amended (46 U.S.C. 27rates. 6a) regarding prevailing wage
��'/ � o
��
;�
f
U
RESOLUTION NO. 6764 (1990 Series)//
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN.APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S ACTION
APPROVING THE DEMOLITION OF A RESIDENCE ON PALM STREET (ARC 89 -19)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of public
testimony, the demolition request ARC 89 -19, and the Architectural Review
Commission's action, the Cultural Heritage Committee's appeal, staff
recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. The existing structure. is significant because it contributes to the
historical character of the neighborhood:
2. The replacement structure is at least as compatible with the
neighborhood as the structure to be demolished.
3. The demolition and construction. of a replacement structure will not
have a significant impact on the environment.
SECTION 2. The request for approval of the demolition of the existing
residence is hereby approved.
On motion of Councilman Reiss _ , seconded by
Mayor a in
- - - - - -- and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Amin and Rappa
NOES: Councilmembers Pinard and Roalman
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of February
1990
6764
Resolution No. 6764 (1990 Series)
ARC 89 -19
Page 2
r RON DUNIN
ATTES
U,
City lerk PAM 0GES
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
C4trTy
Community DevelopmenE Director
JL1:restrl82..wp
J � �
L A
C
Q
RESOLUTION NO 6763 (1996 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE•COUNCIL OF THE CITY: OF SAN LUIS OBISPO_
GRANTING APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.1764
LOCATED AT 1250 IRIS STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the.City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of the
vesting tentative map of Tract 1764- and the. Planning Commission's recommendation,
staff recommendation, and reports thereof.makes the following findings:
1. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are consistent with
the general plan.
2. The site is .physically suited for the type and density of development
allowed in the R -2 -S zone.
3. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious health
problems, substantial. environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements for_ access
through (or use of property within) the proposed subdivision.
.5. The proposed project has been granted a negative declaration of
environmental impact based on the following mitigation measures being
incorporated into the project:
a. The existing water main in Iris Street shall be extended to
the site and a hydrant installed. Automatic fire sprinkler
systems shall be installed in all units.
b. The developer shall install a 6 -foot high block wall along the
Bite's northerly property line to attenuate exterior noise for
Units 2 and 3 to acceptable levels. Materials and design of
the wall shall.be to the approval of the Architectural Review
Commission.
C. The developer shall plant two replacement trees for each tree
removed to the approval of the City Arborist and the
Architectural Review Commission..
d. If the Community Development Director determines that the above
measures are ineffective or physically infeasible, he may add,
delete or modify the mitigation to meet the intent of the
original measures.
6163
Resolution No. 6763 (1990 Series) (v)
Page 2
SECTION 2.. Conditions. That the approval of the vesting tentative map
for Tract 1764 be subject to the following conditions:
1. All lots shall be served by ,individual sewer, water and utilities. All
new utilities within the tract shall be placed underground in easements
to the approval of the appropriate utility company and the City Engineer.
Water meters shall be clustered in the public sidewalk to the approval of
the Public Works Department and the Utilities Department.
2. The existing water main in Iris Street shall be extended to the site.
.Plans for the water main extension must be prepared by a registered civil
engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for approval.
3. Subdivider shall construct a manhole in place of the existing clean -out
and extend the Iris,Street public sewer main on -site. The on -site sewer
main shall be terminated with a manhole and each lot shall be served with
individual laterals to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Utilities
Engineer.
4. Sewer and water mains shall be public and to city standards. Easements
over the main and access to mains shall be to the approval of the City
Engineer.
5. Final map shall show a 6- foot.public utilities easement and 10 -foot wide
street tree easement along the project's public street frontages.
6. Final map shall note entire common lot area as a blanket utility easement
(exclusive of buildings) acceptable to the utility companies and City
Engineer.
7. The drainage plan submitted with the final map shall show how off -site
drainage from the French Hospital property will be accepted and conveyed
along the south property line and show the storm drain outlet at the creek
channel.
8. All on -site driveways, nonstructural parking improvements, and utilities
shall be installed as subdivision improvements.
9. Subdivider shall install a fire hydrant to the approval of the City Fire
Department_. Automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all
units.
Resolution No. 6763 (1990 Series)
Tract Map 1764
Page :3 .
10. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC &R's)
to be approved by the City Attorney and Community Development Director
prior to final map approval. CC &R's shall contain the following
provisions:
a. Creation of a homeowners' association to enforce the CC &R's and
provide.for professional, perpetual maintenance of all common area
including private driveways, drainage,,parking lot areas, walls and
fences, lighting, and landscaping in a.first class condition.
b. Grant to the city the right to maintain common area if the
homeowners' association fails to perform, and to assess the
homeowners' association for expenses incurred, and the right of the
city to inspect the site at mutually agreed times to assure
conditions of CC &R's and final map are being met.
C. .'No parking except in approved, designated spaces.
d_ . Grant to the city the right to tow away vehicles " on a complaint
basis which are parked in unauthorized places.
e. Prohibition of storage or other uses which would conflict with the
use of garages for parking purposes.
f. No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, or trailers nor
long -term storage of inoperable vehicles.
g. No outdoor storage by individual units except.in designated storage
areas.
h. No change in city - required provisions of the CC &R's without prior-
City Council approval.
i. Homeowners_' association shall file with the City Clerk the names and
addresses of all officers of the homeowners' association within 15
days of any "chap ge in officers of the association.
j. Provision of appropriate "no parking" signs and red- curbing along
interior roadways as.'required by the City Fire Department.
11. All units shall be numbered in accordance with an addressing plan approved
by the Community Development Department.
12. Subdivider shall install a unit identification plan with directory at the
project entrance to the approval of the Community Development Department.
('.
Resolution No. 6763 (1990 Series)
Tract Map 1764
Page 4
13. Subdivider shall install street lighting as determined by the City Engineer
per City and P.G. & E. standards.
14. Subdivider shall install a 6 -foot high block wall along the site's
northerly property line to attenuate exterior noise for Units 2 and 3 to
acceptable levels. Materials and design of the wall shall be to the
approval of the Architectural Review Commission.
15. Final map shall show a pedestrian access easement along the top of bank
to accommodate a future trail to the approval of the Community Development
Director.
16. Subdivider shall submit plans showing proposed collector locations for
solar water heating and a detail on collector types to the approval of. the
Architectural Review Commission.
17. All garages shall be equipped with automatic garage door openers and
occupants shall be provided with two remote- control units.
18. Subdivider shall provide required motorcycle and bicycle spaces to the
approval of the Architectural Review Commission.
19. The design of all units shall incorporate water - conserving fixtures and
low -flow devices that represent state -of- the -art residential conservation
methods. This requirement shall be monitored when the building permit is
issued and confirmed prior to occupancy by inspection.
SECTION 3. Code- Recruirements. The approval of the vesting tentative map
for Tract 1827 shall be subject to the following code requirements:
1. Tract corners shall'be set by a registered civil engineer or land surveyor.
2. A registered. civil engineer or land surveyor shall certify that the
structures are located correctly prior to release of structures for
occupancy.
3. Subdivider shall pay water and sewer charges and park in -lieu fees as
calculated by the City Engineer prior to final map approval.
4. Subdivider shall install one street tree per 35 feet of property frontage
to city standards to the approval of the Public Works Department.
5. Subdivider shall install curb, gutter and sidewalk, and street paveout to
the approval of the City Engineer.
r�1
Resolution No. 6763 (1990 Series)
Tract Map 1764
Page 5
On motion of Councilwo= RaPPa , seconded by MaYor Amin
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmmbers Rappa, Amin, Pinard and Reiss
NOES None
ABSENT: Councilmember Reiss
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of February
, 1990.
Mayor RON DJNIN
ATTEST: uav�
City C1 rk PAM VOGES
APPROVED:
it i stra ve Offic
9
V
n
.,
r