HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-16-2024 ATC Agenda PacketCity of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission
Agenda
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
May 16, 2024
6:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING Council Hearing Room
City Hall
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo CA
The City has returned to in-person meetings. Virtual participation will not be supported.
For those in attendance, masks are strongly recommended.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Public Comment during the meeting:
If you would like to provide public comment during the meeting, you must attend in person.
Public Comment prior to the meeting can be submitted in the following ways:
• Mail or Email Public Comment
➢ Received by 3pm on the day of meeting - Can be submitted via email to
advisorybodies@slocity.org or U.S. Mail to City Clerk at: 990 Palm St., San Luis
Obispo, CA 93401.
➢ Emails sent after 3pm on the day of meeting – Can be submitted via email to
advisorybodies@slocity.org and will be archived/distributed to members of the
committee the day after the meeting. Emails will not be read aloud at the meeting.
• Verbal Public Comment
➢ Received by 3pm on the day of the meeting - Call (805) 781-7164; state and spell
your name, the agenda item number you are calling about and leave your comment.
The verbal comments must be limited to 3 minutes. All voicemails will be forwarded
to committee members and saved as Agenda Correspondence. Voicemails will not be
played during the meeting.
➢ During the meeting – You must attend the meeting in person.
All comments submitted will be placed into the administrative record of the meeting.
If you have questions, contact the office of the City Clerk at cityclerk@slocity.org or (805) 781-
7100.
MISSION: The purpose of the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) is to provide oversight
and policy direction on matters related to bicycle and pedestrian transportation in San Luis
Active Transportation Committee Agenda May 16, 2024 Page 2
Obispo and its relationship to bicycling and walking outside the City.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Russell Mills
ROLL CALL : Committee Members Dave Amos, Lea Brooks (vice chair), Jill Caggiano,
Francine Levin, Russell Mills (chair), Kimmie Nguyen, Garrett Otto
PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the
agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address.
Comments are limited to three minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred
to staff and, if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of the November 16, 2023 Regular Meeting
2. Minutes of the February 29, 2024 Special Meeting
3. Minutes of the April 11, 2024 Special Meeting
ACTION ITEMS
4. OFFICER ELECTIONS
(FUKUSHIMA - 15 MINUTES)
Recommendation: Select a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to preside for the next year.
5. HIGUERA COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT – PROJECT UPDATE & REQEUST
FOR DESIGN INPUT
(Fukushima – 90 MINUTES)
Recommendation:
1. Receive an update on the Higuera Complete Streets Project; and
2. Provide a recommendation on a preferred design alternative for the S. Higuera Street/Los
Osos Valley Road intersection to advance for further development; and
3. Provide a recommendation on preferred design alternative for Madonna Road to advance
for further development; and
4. Provide general comments on other project components to guide further development of
project plans.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda May 16, 2024 Page 3
PROJECT UPDATE
5. Committee Updates (5 time)
6. Staff updates (5 time)
7. Future Agenda Items
ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the Active Transportation Commi ttee is scheduled for
Thursday , July 18 , 2024 at 6:00 p.m.
The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the
public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to
persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or
accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s
Office at (805) 781-7100 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications
Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7107.
Agenda related writings and documents are available online or for public inspection at the Public
Works Department, 919 Palm Street, SLO. Meeting audio recordings can be found at the
following web address:
https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=60965&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of November 16, 2023 Page 1
Minutes - DRAFT
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Thursday, November 16, 2023 1
Regular Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee 2
3
CALL TO ORDER 4
5
A Regular Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Committee was called to order 6
on Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room located at 990 Palm 7
Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Mills. 8
9
ROLL CALL 10
11
Present: Committee Members Lea Brooks (vice chair), Jill Caggiano, Francine Levin, 12
Russell Mills (chair), Garrett Otto and Jonathan Roberts 13
14
Absent: Kimmie Nguyen 15
16
Staff: Ryan Caldera, Lareina Gamboa, Adam Fukushima, Nathan Garcia Nava, and Luke 17
Schwartz 18
19
PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 20
None. 21
22
--End of Public Comment-- 23
24
APPROVAL OF MINUTES 25
26
1. Review Minutes of the Active Transportation Committee Meeting of September 21, 2023: 27
28
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, SECONDED BY 29
COMMITTEE MEMBER ROBERTS, CARRIED 6-0, to approve the Minutes of the Active 30
Transportation Committee Meeting of September 21, 2023, as presented. 31
32
Public Comment 33
Myron Amerine 34
Kari Howell 35
36
--End of Public Comment-- 37
38
ACTION ITEMS 39
40
2. 2024 Arterial Streets Paving Plan 41
Staff provided a presentation and responded to Committee inquiries. 42
43
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of November 16, 2023 Page 2
Public Comment 44
Myron Amerine 45
46
--End of Public Comment-- 47
48
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 49
COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, CARRIED 6-0, to recommend staff take committee 50
comments into consideration in regards to Grand Avenue. 51
52
(Committee Members Levin and Roberts recused themselves - 7:30 p.m.) 53
54
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 55
COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, CARRIED 4-0, to recommend staff take committee 56
comments into consideration in regards to Johnson Avenue. 57
58
(Committee Members Levin and Roberts return - 7:40 p.m.) 59
60
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, SECONDED BY 61
COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, CARRIED 6-0, to recommend staff take committee 62
comments into consideration in regards to Pavement Area 1 (East City neighborhoods - North). 63
64
(Committee Member Brooks recused herself - 7:48 p.m.) 65
66
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 67
COMMITTEE MEMBER LEVIN, CARRIED 5-0, to recommend staff take committee 68
comments into consideration in regards to Pavement Area 1 (East City Neighborhoods - South) 69
70
(Committee Member Brooks returned - 7:50 p.m.) 71
(Staff Member Fukushima recused himself - 7:50 p.m.) 72
73
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, SECONDED BY 74
COMMITTEE MEMBER LEVIN, CARRIED 6-0, to recommend staff take committee 75
comments into consideration in regards to Area 8 (University Neighborhoods). 76
77
(Staff Fukushima returned - 8:01 p.m.) 78
(Committee Members Caggiano and Otto recused themselves - 8:01 p.m.) 79
80
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, SECONDED BY 81
COMMITTEE MEMBER LEVIN, CARRIED 4-0, to recommend staff take committee 82
comments into consideration in regards to Pavement Area 7. 83
84
(Committee Members Caggiano and Otto return - 8:03 p.m.) 85
86
Using the rule of necessity, the recording secretary randomly drew names out of a bowl to 87
determine who among those needing to recuse themselves may participate in the action in order 88
to ensure a quorum. Committee members Caggiano, Roberts, and Otto were selected. 89
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of November 16, 2023 Page 3
(Committee Member Brooks and Roberts, and Staff Fukushima member recused themselves - 90
8:09 p.m.) 91
92
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 93
COMMITTEE MEMBER LEVIN, CARRIED 4-0, to forward support of staff’s recommended 94
prioritized project list (1. Johnson Avenue, 2. Grand Avenue, 3. Highland Drive, 4. Chorro 95
Street, 5. Toro Street, 6. Mill Street, 7. Pepper Street). 96
97
(Committee Members Brooks and Roberts, and Staff Fukushima return - 8:27 p.m.) 98
99
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION 100
101
Active Transportation Manager Fukushima provided an agenda forecast. 102
103
3. Committee Member Updates 104
4. Staff Updates 105
a. Higuera Complete Streets Project 106
b. Fall Bike Light Event / Halloween Bag Pedestrian Safety Campaign 107
c. Protected Bike Lane near Creamery 108
d. Updated on Recent Collision 109
5. Future Agenda Items 110
111
112
ADJOURNMENT 113
114
The meeting was adjourned at 8:53 p.m. The next Regular Active Transportation Committee 115
meeting is scheduled for Thursday, January 18, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Hearing 116
Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. 117
118
119
120
APPROVED BY THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2023 121
122
123
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of February 29, 2024 Page 1
Minutes - DRAFT
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Thursday, February 29, 2024 1
SPECIAL Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee 2
3
CALL TO ORDER 4
5
A Special meeting of the San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Committee was called to order 6
on Thursday, February 29, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room located at 990 Palm 7
Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Mills. 8
9
ROLL CALL 10
11
Present: Committee Members Lea Brooks (vice chair), Jill Caggiano, Francine Levin, 12
Russell Mills (chair), Kimmie Nguyen, Garrett Otto and Jonathan Roberts 13
14
Absent: None 15
16
Staff: Ryan Caldera, Adam Fukushima and Luke Schwartz 17
18
PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 19
Myron Amerine 20
21
--End of Public Comment-- 22
23
24
ACTION ITEMS 25
26
1. 2024 Roadway Paving Project 27
Staff provided a presentation and responded to Committee inquiries in regards to the following 28
projects: 29
30
● Grand Avenue 31
32
Public Comment 33
Myron Amerine 34
Reagan Denny 35
Olivia Momberg 36
37
--End of Public Comment-- 38
39
● Johnson Avenue 40
41
(Committee Members Levin and Roberts recused themselves - 7:15 p.m.) 42
43
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of February 29, 2024 Page 2
Public Comment 44
Myron Amerine 45
46
--End of Public Comment-- 47
48
(Committee Members Levin and Roberts returned - 7:40 p.m.) 49
50
● Paving Area 1 - North (East City Neighborhoods) 51
52
Public Comment 53
None. 54
55
--End of Public Comment-- 56
57
● Paving Area 1 - South (East City Neighborhoods) 58
59
(Committee Member Brooks recused herself - 7:52 p.m.) 60
61
Public Comment 62
Myron Amerine 63
64
--End of Public Comment-- 65
66
(Committee Member Brooks returned - 8:01) 67
68
● Paving Area 8 (University Neighborhoods) 69
70
(Staff Fukushima recused himself - 8:01 p.m.) 71
72
Public Comment 73
Myron Amerine 74
Ryan Meller 75
Noemi Ho 76
77
--End of Public Comment-- 78
79
(Staff Fukushima return - 8:20 p.m.) 80
81
● Paving Area 7 82
83
(Committee Members Caggiano and Otto recused themselves - 8:20 p.m.) 84
85
Public Comment 86
None. 87
88
--End of Public Comment-- 89
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of February 29, 2024 Page 3
90
(Committee Members Caggiano and Otto returned - 8:24 p.m.) 91
92
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER ROBERTS, SECONDED BY 93
COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, CARRIED 7-0, to recommend staff take the Active 94
Transportation Committee’s consensus comments into consideration as the project is further 95
developed. 96
97
98
ADJOURNMENT 99
100
The meeting was adjourned at 8:46 p.m. The next Regular Active Transportation Committee 101
meeting is scheduled for Thursday, March 21, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Hearing 102
Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. 103
104
105
106
APPROVED BY THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2024 107
108
109
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of April 11, 2024 Page 1
Minutes - DRAFT
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Thursday, April 11, 2024 1
SPECIAL Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee 2
3
CALL TO ORDER 4
5
A Special Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Committee was called to order 6
on Thursday, April 11, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room located at 990 Palm Street, 7
San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Mills. 8
9
ROLL CALL 10
11
Present: Committee Members Dave Amos, Lea Brooks (vice chair), Francine Levin, Russell 12
Mills (chair), Kimmie Nguyen, and Garrett Otto 13
14
Absent: Jill Caggiano 15
16
Staff: Adam Fukushima, Ryan Caldera, Luke Schwartz, Lucia Pohlman, Chris Read, 17
Robert Hill 18
19
PLAQUE PRESENTATION: Jonathan Roberts 20
21
OATH OF OFFICE: Dave Amos 22
23
PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 24
Myron Amerine 25
26
--End of Public Comment-- 27
28
29
ACTION ITEMS 30
31
1. Bikeshare Request for Proposals 32
Pullman provided a presentation and responded to Committee inquiries. 33
34
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 35
COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, CARRIED 6-0, for staff to accept the Active 36
Transportation Committee recommendations and comments about the bikeshare RFP. 37
38
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, SECONDED BY 39
COMMITTEE MEMBER NGUYEN, CARRIED 6-0, to support the issuance of the bikeshare 40
RFP. 41
42
Public Comment 43
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of April 11, 2024 Page 2
Myron Amerine 44
Aaron Posternack 45
Ryan Meller 46
Kari Hovell 47
David Figueroa 48
Jonathan Roberts 49
50
--End of Public Comment-- 51
52
2. 2024 Raodway Sealing Project Update 53
Staff provided a presentation and responded to Committee inquiries. 54
55
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 56
COMMITTEE MEMBER LEVIN, CARRIED 6-0, recommending that the Grand Ave project 57
be completed as a quick-build project. 58
59
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 60
COMMITTEE MEMBER AMOS, CARRIED 6-0, that the committee strongly supports the 61
original one-lane configuration of the northbound Grand Avenue part of this project for the 62
safety of all roadway users, especially vulnerable users. 63
64
ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OTTO, SECONDED BY 65
COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, CARRIED 6-0, to recommend keeping only one lane 66
southbound on Grand Ave as originally proposed at the February 29, 2024 ATC meeting 67
68
Public Comment 69
Myron Amerine 70
David Figueroa 71
Jonathan Roberts 72
Aaron Posternack 73
Marlene Cramer 74
Yiming Luo 75
76
--End of Public Comment-- 77
78
PROJECT UPDATE 79
80
3. Staff Update - Higuera Complete Streets Project 81
Staff provided a presentation and responded to Committee inquiries. 82
83
Public Comment 84
Myron Amerine 85
86
--End of Public Comment-- 87
88
No action was taken on this item. 89
Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of April 11, 2024 Page 3
90
91
ADJOURNMENT 92
93
The meeting was adjourned at 8:42 p.m. The next Regular Active Transportation Committee 94
meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Hearing Room, 95
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. 96
97
98
99
APPROVED BY THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2024 100
101
102
City of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission
Active Transportation Committee
AGENDA REPORT ITEM 4
DATE: May 16, 2024
FROM: Adam Fukushima, Active Transportation Manager
SUBJECT: OFFICER ELECTIONS
Recommendation: Select a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to preside for the next year.
Discussion
The committee chairperson and vice-chairperson play an important role in committee meetings.
The chairperson’s main role is to provide the advisory body with group direction and to set the
tone for meetings. The Chair also balances making sure all committee points of view have been
heard on an agenda topic yet also assertive enough to move the meeting along to reach decision
within the time allotted. The vice-chair presides over meetings when the chair is unable to.
Article 3 of the Active Transportation Committee Bylaws states:
“The officers will consist of a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson who will be elected
annually at a regular Committee meeting in each calendar year. The Chairperson will
preside over all meetings of the Committee and perform such duties as directed by the
Committee. The Vice-Chairperson will serve in the absence or incapacity of the
Chairperson.”
The Advisory Body Handbook provides additional information about the role and
responsibilities of the chair and vice chair. See Attachment 1 from the Handbook for an excerpt
of the traits of an effective chairperson.
Additional officer duties include writing quarterly progress reports, representing the ATC at the
Mayor’s quarterly luncheon, and representing the Committee at relevant Advisory Body and City
Council meetings. The term of office is for one year. No person shall serve in the office of
chairperson or vice chairperson for more than two consecutive terms. Russell Mills has served
two consecutive years as chair and therefore is ineligible to serve in that role for the next year.
Likewise, Lea Brooks has served two consecutive years as vice-chair and therefore is ineligible
to serve in that role for the next year as well.
All committee members should consider serving as an officer at some point in their term as each
individual brings their own experiences and points of view to the roles.
Next Steps
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 4, May 16, 2024 Page 2
The newly selected chair and vice-chair will start their term at the next ATC meeting.
Attachments: Attachment 1: Advisory Body Handbook Excerpt
Advisory Body Handbook September 21, 2021
City of San Luis Obispo 27 |Page
F.Communicate Effectively
Advisory body members serve as a communications link between the community, staff, and City
Council. You provide a channel for citizen expression. Not only is it important for you to listen
carefully to others, but you also need to be able to communicate effectively what you are hearing
and thinking.
1.Take notes to remind yourself of questions you want to ask or important comments you wish
to make.
2.Be direct, open, and forthright.
3.Provide rationale for opinions or recommendations.
4.Stay on topic.
5.Take your charge seriously but maintain composure and keep your sense of humor.
6.When speaking to the public and/or press, be sure you are representing the majority views of
your individual advisory body. Personal opinions should be clearly identified as such.
7.Speak clearly and be sure people can hear you.
8.If you wish to communicate using electronic mail (email), use the tool wisely. It is easy to
unintentionally violate the Brown Act, so certain caution must be exercised when using email.
(See Section 4 C, Common Questions about the Brown Act.)
G.Special Tips for the Chairperson
The chairperson’s main role is to provide the advisory body with grou p direction and to set the
tone for meetings. The Chair must balance being strong enough to move the meeting along and
democratic enough to involve all members in the meeting. The effective chairperson:
Remembers to explain the public participation process to the audience. (For example: “The
commission will hear first from staff who will present the staff report. Commission questions to
staff will follow and then the floor will be open to the public, who may comment on the matter.
Following public comment, the matter will come back to the commission for our deliberation and
action.”)
1.Announces each item before discussion begins.
2.Is even-handed and fair to all participants.
3.Observes specified time limits.
4.Protects commissioners and staff from verbal attacks.
5.Solicits opinions, feelings, and positions from all members.
6.Encourages the generation of alternative solutions.
Item 4, Attachment 1, Page 1 of 2
Advisory Body Handbook September 21, 2021
City of San Luis Obispo 28 |Page
7.Protects new thoughts from being rejected prior to fair evaluation.
8.Discourages finger pointing and blame-orientated statements or questions.
9.Keeps the discussion focused on the issue.
10.Delays evaluation and analysis of alternatives until all are on the table.
11.Guides the process of screening alternatives and selecting the solution.
12.Attempts to obtain consensus.
13.Moves the meeting along and does not let the advisory body drift off the subject at hand.
H.Managing Difficult Meetings
Here are some additional tips for managing any meeting, but particularly the difficult ones:
1.Encourage the designation of a spokesperson for any groups.
2.Ask staff to make sure there are plenty of extra agendas and staff reports.
3.Establish and announce rules before the meeting begins.
4.Introduce each item and possible actions.
5.Try not to waste time on routine items.
6.Encourage speakers to address the advisory body and not the audience.
7.Discourage clapping and shouting.
8.Use recesses to help diffuse hostility.
9.Adhere to speaker time limits.
10.If you don’t already, use speaker slips/cards.
11.Make sure that all advisory body members are addressing each other, through you, and not the
audience.
12.Consider continuing an item for further discussion if it appears consensus may not be reached.
Item 4, Attachment 1, Page 2 of 2
City of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission
Active Transportation Committee
AGENDA REPORT ITEM 5
DATE: May 16, 2024
FROM: Adam Fukushima, Active Transportation Manager
PREPARED BY: Luke Schwartz, Transportation Manager
Adam Fukushima, Active Transportation Manager
Ryan Caldera, Transportation Planner-Engineer
SUBJECT: Higuera Complete Street Project – Project Update & Request for Design Input
Recommendation:
1. Receive an update on the Higuera Complete Streets Project; and
2. Provide a recommendation on a preferred design alternative for the S. Higuera Street/Los
Osos Valley Road intersection to advance for further development; and
3. Provide a recommendation on the preferred design alternative for Madonna Road to
advance for further development; and
4. Provide general comments on other project components to guide further development of
project plans.
Background
The last time the ATC provided a comprehensive review on the Higuera Complete Street project
was on February 16, 2022, when preliminary concept designs were shared by staff prior to pursuing
outside grant funding. Since then, staff has made significant progress with this project, including:
• Securing more than $8.5 million in outside grant funding ($6.9 million from Caltrans and
$1.6 million from SLOCOG), and more than $1 million in local funding.
• Preparation of 50%-level design drawings and required environmental studies.
• Conducting public outreach on preliminary project designs, including in-person public
input opportunities via public workshops, neighborhood pop-ups, and collecting public
comments via emails and phone calls to staff. (See Attachment A for a summary of public
outreach and input to date)
• Continued coordination with Caltrans on possible opportunities to provide protected
bikeways along the Madonna Road overpass of US 101.
Additional background information on the Higuera Complete Streets project is also available on
the project website for reference.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 5, May 16, 2024 Page 2
The purpose of this item is to provide an update on project status to the ATC and other community
members and solicit feedback from the committee to guide final design direction on a few areas of
the project where multiple design options have been considered.
Discussion
Following input from the ATC, public, and continued coordination with Caltrans on possible
design options for Madonna Road throughout 2022 and 2023, staff has continued with refinement
of the concept plans, including development of several new design alternatives at select locations
and additional traffic operations analysis to guide review of these alternative designs. Attachment
B includes the latest concept designs for the full project, while additional attachments referenced
below highlight specific focus areas for further discussion. Additional discussion on key project
updates and focus areas for ATC input are provided below.
➢ Meadow Park Neighborhood Greenway
Initial design concepts presented for the neighborhood greenway segments near the Meadow
Park neighborhood included significant traffic calming and intersection modifications,
including numerous speed humps and neighborhood traffic circles. During community
outreach, including a neighborhood pop-up at Meadow Park, many residents provided
feedback opposing traffic circles and speeds humps, with a general sentiment that most of these
streets already had low traffic speeds/volumes and were comfortable routes for walking and
bicycling without a need for major intervention. Essentially, a “gentle touch” was desired for
this neighborhood, with a preference to use limited project funds/resources where they are most
needed—along higher-traffic arterials streets, such as Higuera Street and Madonna Road.
Based on this input, staff collected additional traffic data, and reviewed collision history along
the neighborhood greenway segments. Based on this analysis and public input, the project
designs were revised as follows:
• Speed humps were eliminated on streets where existing traffic speeds were low (25
mph or less), but retained on streets where speeds exceed 25 mph.
• Neighborhood traffic circles were removed from the project designs.
• Additional daylighting is proposed to improve visibility at intersections along the
greenway route (parking restrictions at intersections, striped bulbouts with vertical
hardening, mostly flex posts, at key intersection conflict areas).
• An all-way stop with high-visibility crosswalks is proposed at the
Woodbridge/Meadow intersection to improve crossing safety and comfort for people
walking and bicycling along the route and to/from Meadow Park.
• Path lighting was added along the short shared-use path connecting Exposition Drive
to the Bridge Street cul-de-sac.
• A bike ramp was added on Woodbridge just west of Meadow Street to provide access
to/from the Meadow Park shared-use path.
Attachment C includes the updated concept plans for the neighborhood greenway segments
near Meadow Park.
➢ South / King Street Intersection
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 5, May 16, 2024 Page 3
Last year, a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) was installed at this intersection as
an interim strategy to improve bicycle and pedestrian crossings, with future plans to upgrade
to a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) via grant funding provided by SLOCOG. After
installation of the RRFB, staff conducted additional data collection and confirmed that based
on additional crossing activity and current traffic volumes, a full traffic signal can now be
warranted based on state/federal standards. The traffic signal will be installed as a separate
capital project ahead of the Higuera Complete Streets construction, but the ATC should be
aware of this change in scope. Staff is currently finalizing designs and coordinating with PG&E
on electrical service and SLOCOG on the grant funding agreement. At this point, staff
anticipates the project will be ready to advertise this fall, with construction to occur in 2025.
➢ Higuera / Elks Lane Intersection
Previous plans included installation of a PHB as the permanent crossing treatment at this
intersection, as a traffic signal was not warranted as a permanent installation per previous
traffic studies. However, a temporary traffic signal would be needed for a 2-year period during
construction of the Prado Road Creek Bridge Replacement, which will close Prado Road and
divert traffic to/from Elks Lane. Staff had some concerns about potential user confusion with
operating this intersection as a PHB, then temporary traffic signal, then transitioning back to a
PHB after completion of the bridge reconstruction. Following collection of updated traffic
count data and analysis, staff concluded that warrants can now be satisfied to support
installation of a full traffic signal, even beyond the temporary bridge construction. Thus, the
updated project plans will include installation of a standard traffic signal at Higuera/Elks,
which staff believes will improve safety and provide a more intuitive experience for all road
users.
Higuera / Walker Street Closure
Consistent with the Mid-Higuera Area Enhancement Plan, and as identified in the preliminary
project concept plans, staff has explored the possibility of closing Walker Street at Higuera to
reduce intersection conflicts and enhance safety. Various design concepts for achieving this
closure have been explored, including more substantive reconstruction of this intersection to
raise the end of Walker Street up to sidewalk level as a more permanent pedestrian plaza.
However, following further review with SLO Fire and analysis of floodplain impacts, it was
confirmed that a more permanent reconstruction is not feasible at this time due to significant
concerns with emergency access and potential to exacerbate flooding. Thus, the final design
approach will include less extensive sidewalk reconstruction and grade changes, primarily
utilizing quick-build materials (decorative street markings, flex posts, planter boxes) to enforce
the street closure and achieve intended safety benefits without impacting emergency access or
flooding concerns. The current concepts for this location shown in Attachment B are generally
representative of this approach but will be refined in the next design submittal.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 5, May 16, 2024 Page 4
Example Quick-Build Materials for Walker St. Closure
➢ Higuera / Chumash Village Driveway
Over the last year, staff has received numerous comments from Chumash Village residents
about the possible impact of adding protected bike lanes and a proposed road diet (reduction
in vehicle lanes) along Higuera near the Chumash Village driveway, located just north of
Margarita Street. Residents also inquired about the feasibility of adding a traffic signal at this
location to make it easier to enter and exit this driveway. Staff directed the project’s
independent traffic engineering consultant, Central Coast Transportation Consultants (CCTC),
to collect traffic data at this driveway and perform a focused analysis to identify any potential
impacts to driveway ingress or egress with the project. The analysis, which will be included in
an amended project traffic study report and updated on the project website, concluded that the
driveway would operate acceptably within the City’s adopted thresholds for vehicle
delay/congestion at level of service (LOS) C or better during peak hour periods. The project
would increase the average delay by 3-5 seconds per vehicle for drivers exiting this driveway
during peak commute hours, and a traffic signal is not warranted with or without the project.
For this reason, staff does not recommend adjusting the limits of the proposed road diet or
installing a traffic signal at this location.
Based on national data and local experience with previous projects, the proposed road diet is
anticipated to reduce illegal speeding on Higuera Street, which can have a positive benefit for
drivers attempting to judge gaps in traffic when exiting driveways, such as Chumash. In
addition, the proposed project will increase the width of the center two-way left-turn lane at
this location, improving use of this lane for two-stage left turns. With all this said, staff is still
exploring other possible enhancements during final design to improve the experience for
drivers at this location, such as additional warning signage, striping refinements and other
speed reduction measures.
➢ Higuera / Los Osos Valley Road Intersection
At the meeting on February 16, 2022, the ATC provided comment on two preliminary design
alternatives for the Higuera Street/Los Osos Valley Road intersection. The ATC expressed
support for the design option that generally maintains the current bike lane configuration on
the southbound approach (Option 1 below). Staff is supportive of the ATC’s previous
recommendation but wanted to share additional traffic analysis results and review of City
Active Transportation Plan (ATP) design guidance before providing the ATC one final
opportunity to review and affirm their recommendation for this intersection. The two design
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 5, May 16, 2024 Page 5
alternatives considered for this intersection are described further below and shown in
Attachment B.
Option 1 (Retain Southbound Bike Lane Channelization)
This option is generally consistent with what exists today at this intersection for the
southbound bike approach, but with some additional minor striping refinements and green
pavement markings. This option would have no measurable impacts on traffic operations.
Currently, southbound cyclists continuing straight on Higuera need to depart the bike lane
and weave across the outside traffic lane to enter a channelized bike lane between the thru
and right-turn lanes. Cyclists turning right onto Los Osos Valley Road are required to share
the right-turn lane with vehicle traffic for approximately 200 feet. There are currently >600
vehicles per hour in this outside traffic lane during peak times and vehicle speeds can
exceed 40 mph, creating an uncomfortable experience for most cyclists. Previously, the
ATC expressed a preference for this option due to potential concerns with poor right-turn
on red compliance by drivers and poor compliance from cyclists in obeying a potential bike
signal phase, as proposed in Option 2 (see below). This is perhaps a pragmatic stance and
would provide the additional benefit of creating no measurable impact on traffic operations.
However, it should be acknowledged that this would conflict with the City’s ATP Design
Guidelines1 and other industry best practices, which recommend addition of bicycle signals
or setback/protected intersection crossings at locations that conflict with heavy right-
turning movements.
Higuera/Los Osos Valley Road Intersection Option 1
Option 2: (Bike Signal and Curbside Protected Bike Lane)
This concept was identified as an option to provide a lower-stress route for southbound
cyclists consistent with the City’s ATP design guidance. This would include retaining the
southbound protected bike lane at the curbside, then separating the southbound bicycle
1 2021 City of San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Plan, Appendix C (Design Guidelines): Policy 4.12
- On streets with speeds of 30 mph or greater with striped bike lanes, or where protected bicycle lanes are
provided, bike channelization should generally be avoided at right-turn lanes. Instead, alternative
treatments such as protected intersections (setback crossings) or dedicated bike signal phases should be
implemented to facilitate more comfortable intersection crossings for riders of all ages and ability levels.
The City shall encourage Caltrans and the County to apply a similar strategy for intersection
improvements proposed within the vicinity of the City, but not under City jurisdiction.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 5, May 16, 2024 Page 6
movement with a dedicated bike signal phase. Right turns on red are already prohibited at
this approach and would remain prohibited during the bike signal phase. However, as noted
above, this solution relies on signal compliance from drivers and cyclists to effectively
separate conflicts. Analysis of traffic operations under this alternative shows that adding a
dedicated bicycle phase would create a significant traffic impact, causing operations to
deteriorate below the City’s adopted level of service (LOS) and queuing thresholds, which
would require the City Council to formally accept this policy deficiency.
Higuera/Los Osos Valley Road Intersection Option 2 Signal Phasing
➢ Madonna Road Bikeways
Early in project development, staff explored opportunities to extend protected bike lanes on
Madonna Road along the US 101 overcrossing, which would provide a continuous protected
bikeway between Higuera Street and the terminus of the existing Madonna Road shared-use
path at the US 101 SB Ramps/Madonna Inn intersection. This is a primary cross-town route
for commuters, recreational cyclists, and Laguna Middle School students. The overpass of US
101 is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and any proposed changes would require their design
approval. Initial discussions with Caltrans in 2022 indicated that protected bike lanes could not
be supported, as this would require narrower auto lanes and clear shoulder widths than allowed
per Caltrans design standards.
During public outreach throughout 2023, a frequent request was for staff to revisit discussions
with Caltrans to continue to pursue protected bikeways on Madonna Road. Thus, staff
continued coordination with Caltrans, collected additional traffic volume and vehicle
classification data requested by Caltrans, developed additional design concept alternatives,
prepared additional traffic operations studies, and closely tracked progress on pending
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 5, May 16, 2024 Page 7
amendments to Caltrans design standards. Caltrans Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 94 –
Complete Streets: Contextual Design Guidance, which was in development through 2022 and
2023, could have provided a potential path forward by permitting more flexible lane widths in
urban street environments to accommodate complete street elements. While the final approved
edition of DIB 94, adopted in January 2024, has many promising elements, unfortunately, the
final version exempted use of these flexible design standards for intersections of local
roadways with state highway interchange ramps, which would disqualify the Madonna
Road/US 101 overcrossing and ramp intersections from this new design flexibility.
Currently, staff believes that the only potential path forward to advance protected bikeways on
Madonna Road is for the City to prepare and submit a formal design exception request package
for Caltrans consideration, which requires detailed documentation and justification for
approval of non-standard design elements, and ultimately requires approval from Caltrans at
the Headquarters level. This review process can often take significant time, and there is no
guarantee of approval or timely processing. For this reason, staff anticipates the need to
advance plans for Madonna Road without protected bikeways as part of this Higuera
Complete Street project, including only minor bikeway striping enhancements that can
be approved within the Caltrans right-of-way (see Attachment B). This approach would
minimize the risk of the City having to forfeit millions in grant funding due to schedule
delays, while allowing staff to continue to work in parallel through the Caltrans design
exception review process, with hopes to advance protected bike lanes on Madonna Road
in the near future as a stand-alone project.
Although protected bikeways likely cannot be advanced on Madonna Road with this current
project, staff will continue coordination with Caltrans on this request as a parallel path and is
requesting input from the ATC and community to identify a preferred protected bikeway
design option to advance for further development. Two protected bikeway design options have
been prepared for Madonna Road thus far, which are described in further detail below and
illustrated in Attachment D.
Option 1 (Directional Protected Bike Lanes on Both Sides of Madonna Road)
This option would feature directional (one-way) protected bike lanes on each side of
Madonna Road between the US 101 SB Ramps/Madonna Inn intersection and Higuera
Street. The primary advantages are:
• This configuration provides continuous protected bike lanes on each side of
Madonna Road.
• This design is consistent with City’s ATP design policies2
• This design has less potential for significant impacts to traffic operations compared
to the two-way bikeway option.
2 2021 City of San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Plan, Appendix C (Design Guidelines): Policy 6.8 -
Directional bikeways (i.e. one-way facility on each side of the street) are the preferred configuration for
new bike lane and protected bike lane installations. Two-way bicycle facilities may be considered in
constrained locations but should generally be avoided along streets with high vehicle speeds, frequent
intersections and high traffic volume driveways. Where proposed, two-way bicycle facility intersections
should be controlled by dedicated bicycle signal phases.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 5, May 16, 2024 Page 8
The primary disadvantage is this option is:
• This design would require cyclists traveling eastbound from the existing Madonna
Road two-way shared-use path to cross to the south side of the street to continue
eastbound towards Higuera Street. The need for this inconvenient crossing exists
currently and would continue to remain with this option.
• This option requires cyclists to cross both US 101 NB and SB Ramp intersections,
increasing exposure to vehicle right-turns across the bikeway.
At the meeting on February 16, 2022, the ATC provided their stated preference for this
option when discussing preliminary options for protected bikeways on Madonna Road.
Option 2 (Two-Way Protected Bikeway on North Side of Madonna Road)
This option would continue the two-way bikeway on the north side of Madonna from the
US 101 SB Ramps/Madonna Inn intersection east to Higuera Street. The primary
advantages of this option are:
• This design would create a mile-long continuous two-way bikeway along Madonna
between Oceanaire Drive and Higuera Street, eliminating the need to cross
Madonna Road between these end points.
• The two-way bikeway on the north side of the street would avoid crossing the US
101 SB Ramps, reducing conflicts with right-turning vehicles entering the on-
ramps.
• The scope of this design concept could potentially be expanded to explore a
sidewalk-level two-way shared-use pedestrian/bicycle path on the north side of the
street, which would also benefit pedestrian circulation. Note that would introduce
additional design complexity and costs compared to a bicycle-only facility.
The key disadvantages of this option are:
• Width constraints preclude adding the two-way bikeway on the north side and
retaining a continuous eastbound bike lane on the south side of Madonna Road to
Higuera Street—the existing eastbound bike lane would need to terminate about
300’ west of the Higuera intersection, forcing some cyclists to share the auto lane
with heavy vehicle traffic (or cross to north side, then back to south side again).
To try and retain the eastbound bike lane on the south side, additional road
widening and potential right-of-way acquisition would likely be needed.
• Design is generally inconsistent with City ATP Design Policies, which prioritize
directional bikeways on high-traffic arterial streets.
• Design requires two-way bikeway crossing at Caltrans maintenance yard driveway
on north side, introducing additional conflicts with heavy vehicle traffic.
• Design cannot accommodate EB pedestrian travel transitioning from existing
shared use path on Madonna Road to the north side of the overpass, which may be
confusing to pedestrians. To accommodate pedestrian travel, there would be
significant costs and design challenges in upgrading to a shared use path including
ADA, raising the path to a sidewalk level, installing pedestrian signals at the NB
freeway ramps, and meeting drainage requirements. All of these design elements
would require Caltrans approval.
• This option generates more significant impacts to traffic operations within City
and Caltrans jurisdictions.
Table 1 below provides a detailed comparison of each option.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 9
Table 1: Comparison of Madonna Road Protected Bikeway Options
Topic Option 1
(Directional Bike Lanes on each side of Madonna Rd)
Option 2
(Two-way Bikeway on the north side of Madonna Rd)
Policy
Consistency
• Consistent with ATP Design Guidelines • Less consistent with ATP Design Guidelines
Bikeway
Width
• 5’-7’ bike lane in each direction + 2’-5’ buffer with
vertical separation
• 8’ wide two-way bikeway (4’ in each direction) + 2’-4’
buffer with vertical separation on north side of street
• 0’-7’ EB bike lane on south side of street
o EB bike lane ends 300’ west of Higuera St.
Bikeway
Connectivity
• Requires EB cyclists on existing shared-use path to
cross to south side of street at US 101 SB Ramps/
Madonna Inn int. to continue EB towards Higuera
o Adding a diagonal bike signal could improve
this crossing, but traffic analysis shows that this
increases queueing at SB off-ramp, which
Caltrans may not approve.
o Staff can revisit discussions with Caltrans on a
potential right-turn bike box at the Madonna
Inn approach to facilitate this crossing, but this
request was rejected previously.
• Would retain continuous eastbound bike lane on the
south side of Madonna Rd
• Provides continuous one-mile, two-way bikeway on north
side of Madonna between Higuera and Oceanaire.
• Would require terminating EB bike lane on south side of
street 300’ west of Higuera St, which may not be
expected/intuitive for EB bicyclists.
o EB cyclists could cross to north side upstream of
bike lane terminus, but would be out-of-direction
for some, particularly those continuing EB or SB at
Madonna/Higuera intersection.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 10
Topic Option 1
(Directional Bike Lanes on each side of Madonna Rd)
Option 2
(Two-way Bikeway on the north side of Madonna Rd)
Intersection
Conflicts
• Right-turn on red restrictions recommended at all
signalized intersections along Madonna bikeway.
• EB cyclists have conflicts with right-turning traffic at 2
intersections/driveways: crossing the US 101 SB
Ramps intersection, and at Caltrans offices driveway
on south side.
• WB cyclists have conflicts with right-turning traffic at
3 intersections/driveways: at the Madonna Inn
intersection, US 101 NB On-Ramp, and Caltrans
maintenance driveway on north side (right- and left-
turn conflicts)
• No two-way/contraflow bikeway conflicts.
• Right-turn on red restrictions recommended at all
signalized intersections along Madonna two-way bikeway.
• Two-way bikeway conflicts with right-turning traffic at 3
intersections/driveways: at the Madonna Inn intersection,
the US 101 NB Ramps intersection, and at Caltrans
maintenance driveway on the north side
o Two-way/contraflow bikeway conflicts with truck
traffic at Caltrans maintenance yard driveway, not
ideal and may not be intuitive to drivers.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 11
Topic Option 1
(Directional Bike Lanes on each side of Madonna Rd)
Option 2
(Two-way Bikeway on the north side of Madonna Rd)
Traffic
Operations
• Madonna/US 101 SB Ramps/Madonna Inn
o No new significant impacts without dedicated
bike signals (bikes cross with ped or veh
signals)
o With bike signals, SB off-ramp queueing
increases, which may not be acceptable to
Caltrans
• Madonna/US 101 NB Ramps
o No new significant impacts without dedicated
bike signals (bikes cross with ped or veh
signals)
o With bike signal phase, NB off-ramp queueing
increases, which may not be acceptable to
Caltrans
• Madonna/Higuera Intersection (more discussion below)
o No new significant impacts without dedicated
bike signals (bikes cross with ped or veh
signals)
o With bike signal phases, intersection level of
service fails (LOS F), EB queues spill back to
US 101, SB queues spill beyond South St
intersection.
• Madonna/US 101 SB Ramps/Madonna Inn
o No significant impacts without dedicated bike
signals (bikes cross with ped or veh signals)
o With bike signals, level of service fails (LOS F),
SB off-ramp queueing increases, which may not be
acceptable to Caltrans
• Madonna/US 101 NB Ramps
o EB bike movement not possible without adding
bike signal (or ped signal).
o With bike signal, level of service fails (LOS E),
WB queues spill back to Higuera, EB lane queues
spill back out of left-turn pocket, and NB off-ramp
queueing increases, which may not be acceptable to
Caltrans
o If new ped signal added (as shared-use path), would
still create some queueing concerns, but better than
with bike signal.
• Madonna/Higuera Intersection (more discussion below)
o No new significant impacts without dedicated bike
signals (bikes must cross with ped or veh signals).
However, EB bike intersection crossings
impractical without bike signal phases (requires
most EB cyclists to cross 2-3 legs of intersection)
o With bike signal phases, intersection level of
service fails (LOS E), EB queues spill back to US
101, SB queues spill beyond South St intersection.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 12
Topic Option 1
(Directional Bike Lanes on each side of Madonna Rd)
Option 2
(Two-way Bikeway on the north side of Madonna Rd)
Pedestrian
Connectivity
• No notable change to pedestrian access or circulation. • No notable change to pedestrian access or circulation as
currently envisioned as two-way bikeway
• Concept could be expanded from two-way on-street
bikeway to two-way sidewalk-level shared-use path on
north side of street to close sidewalk gap and improve
access for bikes and pedestrians
o Raised pedestrian/bicycle path would create
additional design complexities and cost increases
(changes to drainage, ADA compliance, added
weight on bridges, new pedestrian signals at NB
ramps, etc.)
While staff acknowledges that impacts to motor vehicle congestion are not the only consideration when guiding safety and mobility
improvements, the following key traffic analysis findings are worth highlighting:
• Any significant traffic impacts created by the project will need to be formally accepted by the City Council and Caltrans. While
certain levels of driver inconvenience/delay may be acceptable to these officials, impacts that could result in safety concerns, such
as queues spilling back onto US 101 ramps, may not be palatable.
• Option 1 could be advanced without triggering any traffic impacts, but only if no dedicated bicycle signal phases are introduced.
• Option 2 likely cannot be advanced without triggering traffic impacts to City and Caltrans intersections, unless no bike signals are
used. However, without bike signals, two-way crossings are more challenging and there would be no reasonable options for
eastbound bike crossings at the Madonna/Higuera intersection.
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 13
➢ Madonna / Higuera Intersection
Two new concept alternatives have been developed for the Madonna/Higuera intersection that
differ from the initial concepts presented previously (and illustrated in Attachment B). Both
new alternatives address comments received by some community members advocating for a
more low-stress option for eastbound cyclists, as well as for the purpose of integrating with the
one-way and two-way protected bikeway options discussed above for Madonna Road. These
new intersection alternatives are shown in Attachment D and discussed further as follows:
Higuera/Madonna Intersection Option 1
Higuera/Madonna Intersection Option 2
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 14
• Option 1 retains directional bike lanes on both sides of Madonna Rd.
• Option 2 provides a two-way bikeway on the north side of the street, but requires
eliminating the current eastbound bike lane on the south side of Madonna 300’ west of
Higuera Street (as discussed above)
• Both options provide a lower-stress connection for southbound cyclists, eliminating the
need to merge across several lanes of traffic to continue southbound on Higuera Street.
• As mentioned above, Option 1 could be advanced without significant traffic impacts,
but only if no dedicated bike signal phases are added crossing Higuera St.
o Eastbound cyclists traveling to northbound Higuera would need to make left
turns in two phases, first crossing the south leg with the ped signal, then
continuing northbound with the northbound vehicle signal. This movement
would be less efficient than using existing eastbound bike box.
o Eastbound cyclists would avoid the current weave area with right-turning traffic
approaching the intersection but would still conflict with right-turning traffic
when crossing the intersection with the pedestrian signal, which does not fully
accomplish the objective of improving comfort/safety for eastbound cyclists.
• As mentioned above, Option 2 could be advanced without significant traffic impacts,
but only if no bicycle signal phases are added.
o Without bicycle signals, cyclists would need to use existing pedestrian signals
to cross. Option 2 appears less viable/desirable under this context, as the path
for eastbound cyclists heading to northbound Higuera would require crossing
multiple legs of the intersection, which is not very efficient. Currently, most
eastbound cyclists turn left to northbound Higuera at this intersection; thus, this
design option may lead to poor compliance and unsafe maneuvers by cyclists.
It should be noted that both alternatives require major reconstruction of the northwest and
southwest corners of the intersection, requiring removal of the existing channelizing islands
(including the tree and monument sign at the southeast corner island) and significant traffic signal
modifications. This adds significant cost and design complexity to the project compared to the
previous design (see Attachment B), which may risk the ability to deliver the Higuera Complete
Street project on schedule and without risking existing grant funding.
Lastly, staff also studied the possibility of a protected bike lane on the NB approach of Higuera to
the South Street intersection. The traffic analysis has confirmed that reducing to one SB lane to
provide width for the protected bike lane between Madonna and South Streets would trigger
significant traffic impacts, with SB queues spilling far beyond South Street. For that reason, staff
is not recommending a protected bike lane on the NB approach to the intersection at this time.
Staff Recommendations and Focus Areas for ATC Review & Input
Higuera Street/Los Osos Valley Road Intersection
Ultimately, staff understands there are advantages and disadvantages with either design alternative
for this intersection and supports the committee’s previous support for Option 1 if that remains
their preference. The General Plan Circulation Elements recommends additional capacity
improvements at this intersection to accommodate future growth—if a larger intersection
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 15
reconstruction project is planned in the future at this location, staff recommends exploring
opportunities for further bicycle and pedestrian safety enhancements at that time. If the committee
revises their recommendation to support Option 2, note that this will require Council approval and
will increase traffic congestion and queueing at this intersection beyond the City’s adopted
thresholds.
Madonna Road Protected Bikeways
While staff recognizes the benefits of the two-way bikeway (or shared-use path variant)
contemplated in Option 2, based on the above information, particularly potential elimination of the
eastbound bike lane on the south side of Madonna, potential traffic impacts, and likelihood of
gaining Caltrans approval, staff’s current recommendation would be to advance Option 1
(directional bike lanes on each side of Madonna) for further development. However, as noted
above, staff recommends advancing design work for any protected bike lane variants on Madonna
in parallel with the Higuera Complete Street project, but to be constructed as a future, stand-alone
project.
Madonna Road/Higuera Street Intersection
While acknowledging the benefits that the new alternatives shown in Attachment D provide in
various ways, due to concerns with traffic impacts and challenging bicycle crossings associated
with Option 2, as well as cost/schedule concerns related to both design options, staff’s current
recommendation is to:
• Advance the design concepts shown in Option 1 as part of the Higuera Complete Street
project, but only for the northwest corner of the intersection.
• Continue to evaluate design concepts for the southwest intersection corner, as shown in
Option 1, but to be implemented as a future stand-alone project, perhaps concurrent with
future protected bike lanes on Madonna Road.
This approach would provide a higher-quality design for the northwest corner than previously
proposed for pedestrians and cyclists and avoid significant increases to project costs. However,
this would generally retain the existing configuration for eastbound cyclists, who would continue
through the existing right-turn weave area and use the existing bike box for thru and left-turn
maneuvers. Staff welcomes additional input from the ATC and community on these options.
Focus Areas for ATC Input
The following suggested questions are highlighted to help guide the committee’s review and
discussion.
1. Does the committee want to affirm their preference for Option 1 at the Higuera/Los
Osos Valley Road intersection, which generally retains the southbound bike lane as
exists currently?
2. Does the committee recommend a preferred protected bike lane design alternative for
Madonna Road to advance for further development: Option 1 (Directional Bike
Lanes on Both Sides of Madonna) or Option 2 (Two-Way Protected Bikeway on
North Side of Madonna)?
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 16
3. Does the committee have any comments/recommendations on the various design
alternatives for the Higuera/Madonna Road intersection?
4. Does the committee have any comments/recommendations on other proposed changes
or elements of the Higuera Complete Street project designs?
Funding
When the project was originally presented to the ATC in 2022, the estimated construction cost was
approximately $8.8 million and only a small amount of funding had been secured for preliminary
planning efforts. Since then, the City secured approximately $8.5 million in outside grant funding
and approximately $1 million on local funds to advance environmental review, final design, and
construction. In total, approximately $9.3 million in funding remains available for construction.
In early 2024, cost estimates were updated to account for general escalation and to reflect costs
added by potentially adding (a) protected bike lanes on Madonna Road and (b) the more substantial
intersection improvements contemplated for the Higuera/Madonna intersection as shown in
Attachment D, which were not reflected in previous cost estimates or included in current grant
funding. The updated project construction cost estimate is $10.4 million, which does not include
required soft costs, such as construction management, materials testing, and public
communications support, which could easily increase the total construction cost to $11 million.
This figure exceeds available funding by nearly $2 million.
Due to these considerations, it is likely that some project features will need to be scaled down,
pulled from the project completely, or advertised for construction as “bid additives”, which would
allow the flexibility to bid the project and advance only the essential components for construction
if bids exceed available funding. As noted above, to ensure there are adequate funding resources
to construct the primary project components, staff recommends pulling the Madonna Road
protected bike lanes out of the current construction plans and advancing only a portion of the
Madonna/Higuera intersection reconstruction as part of this project. Staff also plans to pull several
of the 70+ ADA curb ramps out of the base project bid into an optional “bid additive”, which
would retain locations with significant accessibility deficiencies (i.e. no existing curb cuts) within
the base project, while shifting other locations with fewer deficiencies (i.e. where curb cuts exist
but don’t meet latest ADA standards) as added optional components.
Staff will also continue to seek additional local and grant funding opportunities, as available, but
cannot guarantee that additional funds will be secured.
Next Steps
Following review and input from the ATC, staff will continue work to finalize the design plans.
In addition, staff plans to hold one last public workshop opportunity in the fall of this year before
taking final plans to Council for approval in 2025. If the ATC recommends any design options that
would generate General Plan policy impacts, such as deficient traffic operations, staff would need
to also present these policy conflicts to the City Council for formal approval before finalizing
project plans. While the timeline for construction is highly dependent on coordination with
Active Transportation Committee Agenda Item 2, May 16, 2024 Page 17
Caltrans on the encroachment permit for the Madonna overpass portion of the project, and
completion of a separate roadway widening project planned on Higuera between Bridge and Elks,
staff’s current goal is to finalize plans by early 2025 and advertise for construction by mid-2025.
Staff has already requested an extension on the Caltrans ATP grant funding for this project but
does not expect to receive approval to extend this funding beyond early 2026.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Public Outreach Summary
Attachment B: Updated Project Concept Plans
Attachment C: Neighborhood Greenway Concept Plans
Attachment D: Design Options for the Madonna Overpass Segment
1
Overview: Over the last two years, staff has held a series of community outreach
activities for the Higuera Complete Streets project. The purpose of the outreach was to
gain community input on (a) barriers to walking and bicycling along the Higuera corridor
and its connection to other parts of the city, and (b) the types of improvements that are
desired by the community. Participants provided recommendations on topics such as the
types of walking and bicycling improvements they would like to see more, desired
locations for pedestrian crossing improvements and curb ramps, as well as measures to
calm traffic in the Meadow Park neighborhood.
While some community members are
frequent attendees at formal weeknight
public meetings and events, many
residents are often unable to attend
these activities due to work or family
commitments or do not feel comfortable
participating in standard “town hall
style” meeting formats. The public
engagement strategy for the project
consisted of a combination of both
formal, and less-formal outreach
activities (from weekend afternoons to
week nights) to maximize opportunities
for feedback and to ensure that input
reflects the diverse voices of the full
San Luis Obispo community. For those
who were not able or willing to attend
in-person events, staff also collected
input via email and phone.
Activities:
1.Neighborhood Pop-ups: Consisted of two afternoon pop-up events over a weekend
along the project corridor
Higuera Complete Streets Community
Outreach Summary
Attachment A (Page 1 of 6)
Higuera Complete Streets
Community Outreach Summary
2
Locations:
•Food4Less/Trader Joe’s Shopping Center on
Higuera Street (Saturday, April 23, 2022)
•Meadow Park for a Safe Routes to School
bike safety event for the students and parents
of Hawthorne Elementary School (Sunday,
April 24, 2022)
2.Open House Workshop: This event was held at
the City/County library in the early evening of
Thursday, June 8, 2023 featuring stations where
stakeholders could learn about the project, provide
input on a set of conceptual design plans, and ask
questions. Activities included boards to provide
input through post-it ideas or dots and a kids
coloring book station. The workshop was well
attended with approximately 100 persons in
attendance
3.Meadow Park Pop-up Workshop: An
additional workshop was held during a
weeknight to invite input from residents of the
Meadow Park neighborhood on the
improvements proposed for the Meadow Park
neighborhood as well as the larger project
overall. The workshop was well attended with
over 50 persons in attendance.
Project Webpage:
A project webpage describing the project with access to documents and opportunities for
input has been provided at Higuera Complete Streets Project.
Community Input
The following is a summary of major points expressed through community input and the
response from staff:
Attachment A (Page 2 of 6)
Higuera Complete Streets
Community Outreach Summary
3
•Automobile Traffic, Speeding, and Distracted Driving: Among a number of
barriers expressed, top concerns among respondents related to interaction with
automobile traffic or concerns about motorist speeding or distracted driving.
o Response: Several elements to reduce illegal speeding are incorporated
into the design including a road diet on Higuera Street between Margarita
and Bridge Streets, reducing lane widths where possible, and adding hi-vis
cross walks and other striping elements.
•Gaps or stress Points in the Network: Other significant barriers included gaps
or stress points in the bicycle and pedestrian network especially around the
intersection of Higuera/Madonna/South streets, South / King streets, and the lower
Higuera area between Tank Farm Rd and Los Osos Valley Road
•
o Response: Elements to reduce stress points in the bicycle and pedestrian
network including hi-vis crosswalks, protected bike lanes, and intersection
improvements including new signals.
•Improved Connections to Other Parts of the City: Several comments
mentioned the need for improved connections to Higuera Street from the Broad
Street area to the western part of the City via Madonna Road especially the route
to Laguna Middle School as well as to the east and Hawthorne Elementary School.
o Response: New connections have been added to the study area including
Madonna Road from Higuera to the Madonna Inn and a crossing of South
and King Streets
•Upgrading Pedestrian Infrastructure: Many comments expressed the need to
upgrade curb ramps, complete a sidewalk gap on Higuera near Chumash Village
as well as add more cross walks along Higuera.
o Response: Over 70 curb ramp upgrades have been added. A project to
complete a sidewalk gap on Higuera near Chumash Village is also
envisioned as part of the project.
•Preference “Gentle Touch” with traffic calming Along Neighborhood
Greenway: Many residents of the Meadow Park neighborhood displayed a
preference for a minimal approach to traffic calming along the neighborhood
greenway segment.
o Response: All traffic circles as well as speed humps where speeds are
lower than 25 mph have been removed from plans but included where they
exceed 25 mph.
Attachment A (Page 3 of 6)
Higuera Complete Streets
Community Outreach Summary
4
•Desire for Stop Sign at Woodbridge/Meadow Streets: A number of residents
also expressed a desire for a stop sign at Woodbridge/Meadow along the
Neighborhood Greenway to help improve crossing comfort and promote safety in
the neighborhood.
o Response: An all-way stop with high-visibility crosswalks has been added
to the plans at Woodbridge/Meadow
•Crosswalk Connecting Meadow Park to Bridge Street Shared Use Path: Given
the connectivity between the path and Meadow Park, many residents requested a
cross walk at this location across Exposition Rd.
o Response: Crosswalk is in proposed plans
•Protected Bike Lanes
on Higuera with Gaps:
Input from a dot exercise
showed a preference by
many attendees for
protected bike lanes on
Higuera Street as the
preferred style of
bikeway. Many residents
also expressed a need to
have sufficient gaps in
the bikeway to facilitate
left turns to destinations
and cross streets. Many
expressed a desire to
improve the transition
points where cars must
make right turns into driveways and streets.
o Response: Protected bike lanes with gaps at select locations where left
turns are anticipated are included in the plans.
•Upgrade to the Higuera / Madonna and Higuera / South Intersections: A
significant number of comments expressed the challenge of riding a bike through
these two intersections especially the eastbound Madonna approach to Higuera
and the southbound Higuera approach to the Madonna intersection and desired
for bikeway separation as much as possible.
Attachment A (Page 4 of 6)
Higuera Complete Streets
Community Outreach Summary
5
o Response: New design concepts are proposed for the Higuera / Madonna
intersection that improves bicycle access to the intersection. Staff is
continuing to study the Higuera / South intersection for opportunities to
improve bicycle access along the NB Higuera approach.
• Ingress/Egress at Chumash Village: Many residents expressed concern for
turning into and out of the driveway at Chumash Village with the proposed addition
of a road diet.
o Response: The traffic analysis concluded that the driveway would operate
within the city’s adopted thresholds for vehicle delay with addition of the
road diet. Based on national data and local experience with previous
projects, the proposed road diet is anticipated to reduce illegal speeding on
Higuera Street, which can have a positive benefit for drivers attempting to
judge gaps in traffic when exiting driveways, such as Chumash. In addition,
the proposed project will increase the width of the center two-way left-turn
lane at this location, improving use of this lane for two-stage left turns. With
all this said, staff is still exploring other possible enhancements during final
design to improve the experience for drivers at this location, such as
additional warning signage, striping refinements and other speed reduction
measures.
Attachment A (Page 5 of 6)
Higuera Complete Streets
Community Outreach Summary
6
• Access across Higuera at Las Praderas: Residents of the Las Praderas
neighborhood expressed difficulty in crossing Higuera to access the Trader Joe’s
/ Food4Less shopping center.
o Response: Staff studied the possibility of adding a signal at the location but
it did not meet required signal warrants. The project does include hi-visual
crosswalks to improve visibility at Tank Farm and Suburban Roads.
• Crossing at South and Bee Bee Streets: Some residents requested a crossing
at this location
o Response: While this proposed project in the Active Transportation Plan,
it is currently outside of the scope of this project and will need to be
considered as part of future Financial Plan projects.
• Two-Way Protected Bike Lane Between Bridge and Elks Streets: A request
was made for a two-way protected bike lane at this location to help transitioning
to the neighborhood greenway.
o Response: Given policy 6.8 in the Active Transportation Plan Design
Guidelines that two-way facilities should be avoided along higher speed
facilities, staff is not recommending this option.
• Improve Access to Silver City Mobile Home Lodge: Residences of the Silver
City development expressed concern for left turns in to the driveway.
o Response: Project plans will replace worn off pavement markers and
restrict left turns
Attachment A (Page 6 of 6)
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
6'
10
'
2'
2'
54
'
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS,
BICYCLE POCKET WITH
STRIPED BUFFER PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
NEW BIKE BOX
LO
S
O
S
O
S
VA
L
L
E
Y
R
D
S HIGUERA ST
13+00
14+00
15+00 16+00 17+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
150'
TRANSITION
7'
3'
11
'
10
'
10
'
11
'
3'
7'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
56
'
2'
2'
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
STRIPED MEDIAN
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
PERMANENT MEDIAN AND RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT
CHANNELIZATION TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY
AVILA RANCH DEVELOPMENT
S HIGUERA ST
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
VACHELL LN
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND PROVIDED
FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED
BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-01
1 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
Attachment B (Page 1 of 26)
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00
S HIGUERA ST
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
54
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
6'
10
'
2'
2'
LOS OSOS
VALLEY RD
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN: CONTINUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE TO
INTERSECTION ALONG CURB, INTRODUCE BICYCLE SIGNAL PHASE
AND SEPARATE RIGHT-TURN VEHICLE PHASE TO THE
INTERSECTION SIGNAL (SEE BELOW IMAGE FOR SIGNAL PHASING).
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera_ALT.dwg
ALT-1
2 26
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPT FOR LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD/S. HIGUERA INTERSECTION
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND PROVIDED
FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED
BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
DEDICATED BIKE SIGNAL PHASING
SOURCE: NACTO 'DON'T GIVE UP AT THE INTERSECTION'
Attachment B (Page 2 of 26)
17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
7'
65
'
6'
10
'
6'
62
'
3'
11
'
10
'
10
'
11
'
3'
7'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS,
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH CONCRETE
BUFFER
BICYCLE TURN POCKET WITH
SIGNALIZED CROSSING PHASE
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
CONTINUOUS GREEN BIKE LANE
MARKINGS BETWEEN SUBURBAN
AND LAS PADRERAS WHERE
THERE IS INSUFFICIENT WIDTH
FOR BIKEWAY SEPARATION
CONTINUOUS GREEN BIKE LANE MARKINGS
BETWEEN SUBURBAN AND LAS PADRERAS
WHERE THERE IS INSUFFICIENT WIDTH FOR
BIKEWAY SEPARATION
DASHED GREEN BIKE
LANE THROUGH BUS
STOP CONFLICT AREAHIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
S HIGUERA ST
22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
CL
E
A
R
K
E
E
P
6'
10
'
6'
62
'
64
'
5'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
1
0
'
10
'
5'
5'
10
'
10
'
2'
2'
2'
2'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
64
'
CONTINUOUS GREEN BIKE LANE MARKINGS
BETWEEN SUBURBAN AND LAS PADRERAS
WHERE THERE IS INSUFFICIENT WIDTH FOR
BIKEWAY SEPARATION
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE
MEDIAN NOSE FROM BIKE LANE PATH
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
LAS
PRADERAS
DR
S HIGUERA ST
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
SUBURBAN RD
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
######
L-02
3 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 3 of 26)
27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
76
'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
S HIGUERA ST
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
CLEAR
KEEP
WAIT HERE
32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
64
'
76
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'2'
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
EXISTING MEDIAN
S HIGUERA ST
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
TANK FARM RD
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-03
4 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 4 of 26)
37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00
R/W
R/WR/W
R/W
5'
5'
64
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
64
'
10
'
5'
2'
2'
2'
2'
10
'
10
'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
STRIPED MEDIAN
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00
R/W
R/WR/W
R/W
5'
64
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
10
'
2'
2'
64
'
10
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
2'
2'
10
'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
HIND LN
S HIGUERA ST
ZACA LN
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-04
5 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 5 of 26)
47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
64
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
64
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
7'
10
'
2'
2'
2'
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS,
BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
EXISTING BUS STOP
BICYCLE TURN BOX WITH
SIGNALIZED CROSSING PHASE
SIDEWALK RECONSTRUCTION
STRIPED
MEDIAN
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
EXISTING MEDIAN
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
S HIGUERA ST
51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00
R/W
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
64
'
5'
64
'
2'
2'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
S HIGUERA ST
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
5'
2'
2'
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
GRANADA DR
S HIGUERA ST
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-05
6 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND PROVIDED
FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED
BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 6 of 26)
60+00
61+00
62+00 63+00
64+00
65+00
6
4
'
S HIGUERA ST
6
4
'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFERHIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
STRIPED MEDIAN
56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 60+0064
'
64
'
S HIGUERA ST
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFERTWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
PRADO ROAD
PRADO ROAD
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-06
7 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND
PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS
WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND
FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
BUS
STOP
FUTURE INTERSECTION WIDENING AND PROTECTED INTERSECTION AS PART OF PLANNED PRADO ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Attachment B (Page 7 of 26)
65+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
64
'
5'
2'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
2'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
64
'
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
S HIGUERA ST
5'
2'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
2'
5'
10
'
70+00 71+00 72+00 73+00 74+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
ST
A
:
7
3
+
1
0
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
64
'
2'
64
'
50' TRANSITION 14
'
10
'
250' LANE DROP TRANSITION
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS,
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
S HIGUERA ST
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
MARGARITA AVE
·SEE LAYOUT SHEETS FOR ALL CONCRETE AND ASPHALT
IMPROVEMENTS.
·ALL CLASS IV SEPARATION VERTICAL ELEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE
ZICLA ZEBRA CYCLE TRACK LANE SEPARATORS COMBINED WITH
36" WHITE PEXCO CITY POST WITH LIGHT GREY WRAP (10' OC)
UNLESS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS. (1350 TOTAL)
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND PROVIDED
FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED
BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-07
8 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
BUS
STOP
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 8 of 26)
75+00
76+00 77+00 78+00 79+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
64
'
64
'
11
'
15
'
14
'
12
'
11
'
7'
5'
11
'
12
'
11
'
5'
11
'
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE
S HIGUERA ST
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
80+00 81+00 82+00 83+00 84+00
PAVEMENT WIDENING AND TEMPORARY CURB/GUTTER
INSTALLED WITH THIS PROJECT.
FUTURE PERMANENT CURB/GUTTER, SIDEWALK, AND
DRIVEWAYS PLANNED WITH SEPARATE CITY CAPITAL PROJECT
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
7'
5'
11
'
12
'
11
'
16
'
7'
5'
11
'
12
'
11
'
5'
7'
62
'
64
'
7'
5'
11
'
12
'
11
'
5'
7'
62
'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE
S HIGUERA ST
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
CHUMASH DR
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-08
9 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE
PRELIMINARY AND PROVIDED FOR
REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS
WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON COMMUNITY
INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 9 of 26)
85+00
86+00
87+00 88+00 89+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
7'
5'
11
'
12
'
5'
9'
5'
11
'
12
'
11
'
5'
7'
62
'
11
'
10
'
11
'
4'
9'
4'
7'
56
'
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
S HIGU
E
R
A
S
T
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
89+00 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/WR/W
7'
4'
11
'
10
'
11
'
4'
7'
54
'
7'
4'
11
'
10
'
11
'
4'
7'
54
'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER STRIPED MEDIAN
S HIGUERA ST
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
FONTANA AVE
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-09
10 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND
PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS
WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND
FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW.
NOTES:
Attachment B (Page 10 of 26)
94+00
95+00 96+00
97+00
98+0
0
99+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/WR/W
R/W
4
'
7
'
6
'
3
'
1
1
'
1
2
'
1
1
'
3
'
6
'
5
4
'
8'
11
'
13
'
11
'
5'
5'
8'
8'
8'
5'
11
'
13
'
11
'
6'
2'
10
'
62
'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
BICYCLE POCKET WITH
STRIPED BUFFER TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
BICYCLE TURN
POCKET
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL
BICYCLE PUSH
BUTTON TO
ACTIVATE
CROSSING
S HI
G
U
E
R
A
S
T
NEW CURB
RAMP
NEW CURB RAMP
NEW CURB RAMP
NEW CURB RAMP
99+00
100+00
101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
8'
5'
11
'
13
'
11
'
5'
7'
5'
11
'
13
'
11
'
65
'
8'
5'
7'
8
'
5
'
8
'
6
2
'
5
'
1
1
'
1
4
'
1
1
'
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
S HIGUERA ST
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
ELKS LN
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-10
11 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND
PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS
WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND
FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 11 of 26)
104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00
20
0
+
0
0
BP: 200+00.00
PC: 200+31.73
R/W
R/W
R/W
65
'
7'
13
'
11
'
5'
7'
5'
11
'
65
'
7'
13
'
11
'
5'
7'
11
'
5'
32
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
DEDICATED LEFT TURN LANE
TO BRIDGE ST
S HIGUERA ST
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00
1
7
0
+
0
0
1
7
1
+
0
0
1
7
1
+
2
3
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W R/W
10
'
10
'
10
'
3'
9'
11
'
12
'
7'
64
'
10
'
10
'
6'
2'
7'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
5'6'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
7'
80
'
10
'
BUFFERED
BIKE LANE
BICYCLE TURN BOX
PEDESTRIAN REFUGE
RECONSTRUCTION TO ACCOMMODATE
PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS
BICYCLE TURN BOX WITH 6' DEEP
QUEUE AREA, BUFFER WITH CONCRETE
BARRIER, AND BICYCLE PUSH BUTTON
TO ACTIVATE NEW DEDICATED BICYCLE
SIGNAL PHASE (ELIMINATES NEED FOR
SOUTHBOUND CYCLISTS TO MERGE
ACROSS MULTIPLE HIGH SPEED LANES)
BIKE BOX
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
STRIPED MEDIAN
S HIGUERA ST
SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURNS
RESTRICTED AT
HIGUERA/MADONNA INTERSECTION
FOR SAFETY PURPOSES -- LEFT
TURNS REROUTED TO BRIDGE ST
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS
GREEN SHARED-LANE MARKINGS
WHERE INSUFFICIENT WIDTH EXISTS
FOR DEDICATED BIKE LANE
RECONFIGURE NORTHBOUND
APPROACH TO ADD DUAL LEFT-TURN
LANES TO MADONNA RD
LANE DROP IN
SOUTHBOUND
DIRECTION - 250'
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
BRIDGE ST
MADONNA RD
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-18
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L-16
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-11
12 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND
PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN
DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON COMMUNITY
INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
ROAD WIDENING ON WEST SIDE OF HIGUERA PLANNED AHEAD OF COMPLETE STREET PROJECT AS SEPARATE CITY CIP PROJECT
Attachment B (Page 12 of 26)
110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00
1
7
0
+
0
0
1
7
1
+
0
0
1
7
1
+
2
3
S HIGUERA ST
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN: RELOCATE MEDIAN
TO PROVIDE CONTINUOUS NORTHBOUND
THROUGH BIKE LANE AT SOUTH STREET
STRIPED MEDIAN
CONTINUOUS NORTHBOUND BIKE LANE
THROUGH HIGUERA/SOUTH INTERSECTION
11
'
12
'
3'
10
'
11
'
10
'
11
'
11
'
6'
2'
6'
11
'
12
'
5'
6'
6'
12
'
11
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
7'
80
'
12
'
BUFFERED BIKE LANE
BICYCLE TURN BOX
PEDESTRIAN REFUGE
RECONSTRUCTION TO ACCOMMODATE
PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS
BICYCLE TURN BOX WITH 6' DEEP
QUEUE AREA, BUFFER WITH CONCRETE
BARRIER, AND BICYCLE PUSH BUTTON
TO ACTIVATE NEW DEDICATED BICYCLE
SIGNAL PHASE (ELIMINATES NEED FOR
SOUTHBOUND CYCLISTS TO MERGE
ACROSS MULTIPLE HIGH SPEED LANES)
BIKE BOX
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
STRIPED MEDIAN
SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURNS
RESTRICTED AT
HIGUERA/MADONNA INTERSECTION
FOR SAFETY PURPOSES -- LEFT
TURNS REROUTED TO BRIDGE ST
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS
RECONFIGURE NORTHBOUND
APPROACH TO ADD DUAL LEFT-TURN
LANES TO MADONNA RD
6'
3'
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera_ALT.dwg
ALT-2
13 26
AL
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPT FOR S. HIGUERA/MADONNA INTERSECTION
NOTE: SINGLE SOUTHBOUND THOUGH LANE LIKELY RESULTS IN SIGNIFICANT VEHICLE CONGESTION & QUEUING IN SOUTHBOUND DIRECTION DURING PEAK
TRAFFIC PERIODS, BUT PROVIDES WIDTH FOR CONTINUOUS NORTHBOUND BIKE LANE.
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND PROVIDED
FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED
BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
Attachment B (Page 13 of 26)
115+00
116+00 117+00
118+00
119+00
R/W
R/W
10
'
2'
6'
65
'
2'6'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
3
'
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS,
BICYCLE TURN BOXGREEN-BACKED SHARED
LANE MARKINGS
BICYCLE TURN BOXPROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
S HIGUERA ST
EXISTING
NORTHBOUND
LANE DROP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP
119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00
R/W
R/W R/W
R/W
6'
2'
10
'
65
'
65
'
10
'
10
'
6'
81
'
6'
8'
11
'
14
'
11
'
6'
8'
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
EXISTING BUS STOP
EXISTING BUS STOP
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
S HIGUERA ST
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
SOUTH ST
SOUTH ST
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-12
14 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY AND
PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN DETAILS
WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON COMMUNITY INPUT AND
FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
BUS
STOP
Attachment B (Page 14 of 26)
124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
65
'
6'
10
'
5.
5
'
10
'
10
'
2'
45
'
2'
10
'
10
'
10
'
2'
6'
2'
5.
5
'
45
'
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS,
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK MARKINGS
H
I
G
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
S HIGUERA ST
P
I
S
M
O
S
T
R
E
E
T
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
RECONSTRUCT
CURB RAMP
129+00 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+0045
'
R/W
R/W R/W
R/W
STOP
5.
5
'
12
'
10
'
11
'
5.
5
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
2'
2'
44
'
44
'
TWO-WAY LEFT
TURN LANE
WALKER STREET CLOSURE
AND PEDESTRIAN PLAZA
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
WITH RECTANGULAR RAPID
FLASHING BEACONS (RRFBs)
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
S
T
S HIGUERA ST
WAL
K
E
R
ST
WALKER STREET CLOSED AT HIGUERA.
REMOVABLE BOLLARDS RETAIN ACCESS
FOR PEDESTRIANS/BICYCLISTS/
EMERGENCY VEHICLES ONLY
OPPORTUNITY FOR LANDSCAPING
AND/OR PUBLIC ART
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
CONST. CL
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-13
15 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
Attachment B (Page 15 of 26)
134+00 135+00 136+00 137+00 137+74
R/W
R/W
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'2'
2'
44
'
UPDATE TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH HIGH
VISIBILITY SIGNAL HEAD BACKPLATES
AND ADA PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS,
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
M
A
R
S
H
S
T
S HIGUERA ST
EXISTING BIKEWAYS AND
STRIPING TO REMAIN
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
CONST. CL
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera.dwg
L-14
16 26
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
Attachment B (Page 16 of 26)
149+00 150+00 151+00 152+00 153+00
MADONNA RD
88
'
5.
5
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
5.
5
'
CALT
R
A
N
S
R
/
W
CITY
R
/
W
MADONNA INN DRIVEWAY
US 101 SB RAMPS
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
GREEN-BACKED BIKE LANES WHERE
INSUFFICIENT WIDTH EXISTS FOR BIKEWAY
SEPARATION. REDUCED AUTO LANE WIDTHS
UNLIKELY PER CALTRANS DESIGN STANDARDS
GREEN-BACKED BIKE LANES WHERE
INSUFFICIENT WIDTH EXISTS FOR BIKEWAY
SEPARATION. REDUCED AUTO LANE WIDTHS
UNLIKELY PER CALTRANS DESIGN STANDARDS
EXISTING MADONNA
ROAD SHARED USE PATH
PROPOSED BIKE SIGNAL PHASE
FOR BICYCLISTS CONTINUING
FROM SHARED-USE PATH TO
NORTHBOUND MADONNA ROAD
(REQUIRES CALTRANS APPROVAL)
153+00 154+00 155+00 156+00 157+00 158+00
MADONNA RD
80
'
88
'
5'
12
'
12
'
12
'
12
'
5'
11
'
11
'
US 101
5.
5
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
5.
5
'
GREEN-BACKED BIKE LANES WHERE INSUFFICIENT WIDTH
EXISTS FOR BIKEWAY SEPARATION. REDUCED AUTO LANE
WIDTHS UNLIKELY PER CALTRANS DESIGN STANDARDS
GREEN-BACKED BIKE LANES WHERE
INSUFFICIENT WIDTH EXISTS FOR BIKEWAY
SEPARATION. REDUCED AUTO LANE WIDTHS
UNLIKELY PER CALTRANS DESIGN STANDARDS
11' TRAVEL LANES WITHIN CALTRANS
ROW PERMITTED PER DRAFT DIB 94
PENDING CALTRANS APPROVAL
11' TRAVEL LANES WITHIN CALTRANS
ROW PERMITTED PER DRAFT DIB 94
PENDING CALTRANS APPROVAL
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
JP
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera_Madonna_Alt
2.dwg
17
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
·CALTRANS APPROVAL AND DESIGN STANDARDS
APPLY FOR ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON
MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US 101 SB AND NB
RAMP INTERSECTIONS.
NOTES:
L-15
26
Attachment B (Page 17 of 26)
158+00 159+00 160+00 161+00 162+00 163+00
MADONNA RD
65
'
80
'
6.
5
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
6.
5
'
7'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
11
'
US 101
CI
T
Y
R
/
W
CA
L
T
R
A
N
S
R
/
W
11
'
6'
4'
4.
5
'
BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
GREEN BACKED
BIKE LANE
GREEN BACKED
BIKE LANE
11' TRAVEL LANES WITHIN CALTRANS
ROW PERMITTED PER DRAFT DIB 94
PENDING CALTRANS APPROVAL
163+00 164+00 165+00 166+00
MADONNA RD
65
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
10
'
65
'
2'
2'
5'
2'
7'
3'
7'
4'
11
'
11
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
11
'
11
'
UPGRADE
CROSSWALK
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK
BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
JP
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera_Madonna_Alt
2.dwg
18
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
NOTES:
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE
PRELIMINARY AND PROVIDED FOR
REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN
DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER
ENGINEERING REVIEW.
·CALTRANS APPROVAL AND DESIGN
STANDARDS APPLY FOR ANY
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON
MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US
101 SB AND NB RAMP
INTERSECTIONS.
L-16
26
Attachment B (Page 18 of 26)
111
+
0
0
167+00 168+00 169+00 170+00
MADONNA RD
S H
I
G
U
E
R
A
S
T
MADON
N
A
R
D
67
'
5'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
5'
1
0
'
1
0
'
2'
2'
BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
PROTECTED BIKE LANE
PROTECTED BIKE LANE WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
STRIPED MEDIAN
TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE
BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
"RIGHT TURN YIELD TO
CYCLISTS" SIGN
MODIFIED STRIPING ALIGNMENT TO ALLOW
CYCLISTS TO CONTINUE STRAIGHT WITH
RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHILE RIGHT-TURNING
VEHICLES MUST YIELD WHEN MERGING
ACROSS BIKE CONFLICT AREA
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
DIAL TOLL FREE
1-800-422-4133
AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
EX
H
I
B
I
T
NO
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
JP
June 23
1"=20'
2021-206-T-SPM_Higuera_Madonna_Alt
2.dwg
19
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MAT
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
-
1
1
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
L-17
26
Attachment B (Page 19 of 26)
HI
G
U
E
R
A
S
T
BRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
60
'
39
'
52
'
40
'
BRIDGE ST
BE
E
B
E
E
S
T
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
56
'
39
'
56
'
40
'
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
MAT
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
1 7
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
EX-01
NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY GUIDE SIGNAGE TO
BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT GREENWAY ROUTE
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
Attachment B (Page 20 of 26)
BRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
57
'
40
'
56
'
40
'
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
BRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
R
/
W
R
/
W
EXISTING SHARED
U
S
E
P
A
T
H
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
INSTALL BIKE RAMP TO
EXISTING PATH
INSTALL SPEED
HUMP (TYP.)
INSTALL FLOATING CURB
EXTENSIONS WITH TRAIL
CROSSING SIGNAGE (W11-15)
NEW MIDBLOCK
CROSSWALK
60'
40'
60'
60
'
40
'
40'
INSTALL SOLAR
PATH LIGHT
INSTALL SOLAR
PATH LIGHT
10'
10'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MATCH LINE
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
2 7
EX-02
Attachment B (Page 21 of 26)
EXPOSITION DR
MEADOW PARK
SHARED USE PATHS
R/W
R/W
R
/
W
R
/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GREEN
WAY
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GREEN
WAY
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL SPEED HUMP
(TYP.)
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
NEW CROSSWALK
EXISTING BICYCLE RAMP STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
60
'
40
'
60
'
56'
36'
40
'
60
'
40
'
CORRIDA DR
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
CORRIDA DR
MA
D
R
I
D
C
T
R/W
R/W
R/W
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
5
6
'
3
6
'
5
6
'
3
6
'
56
'
36
'
C
O
R
R
I
D
A
D
R
MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
3 7
EX-03
Attachment B (Page 22 of 26)
CORRIDA DR CORRIDA DR
SE
N
D
E
R
O
S
T
BA
N
D
E
R
O
L
A
CT
ME
A
D
O
W
PA
R
K
PA
T
H
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY
MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
36
'
56
'
36
'
CONSTRUCT BIKE RAMP
INSTALL RED CURB
PAINT FOR IMPROVED
VISIBILITY (TYP.)
CORRIDA DR
GA
N
A
D
O
R
C
T
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
56
'
36
'
36
'
56
'
COR
R
I
D
A
D
R
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
4 7
EX-04
Attachment B (Page 23 of 26)
WOODBRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
R/
W R/
W
R/
W
R/W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
S
P
E
E
D
H
U
M
P
(
T
Y
P
.
)
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
NEW CROSSWALK
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
6
0
'
4
0
'
60
'
56'
36'
40
'
60
'
C
O
R
R
I
D
A
D
R
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
WOODBR
I
D
G
E
S
T
ME
A
D
O
W
S
T
MEADOW PARK
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
IN
S
T
A
L
L
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
GR
E
E
N
W
A
Y
M
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
AN
D
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
(
T
Y
P
.
)
INSTALL SPEED HUMP (TYP.)
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSIONS TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES (TYP.)
NEW CROSSWALK (TYP.)
34
'
50
'
6
0
'
4
0
'
CONSTRUCT BIKE RAMP INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MATCH LINE - SEE PREVIOUS SHEET
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
5 7
EX-05
Attachment B (Page 24 of 26)
WOODBRIDGE ST
LA
W
T
O
N
A
V
E
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSIONS TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES (TYP.)
NEW CROSSWALK (TYP.)
34
'
50
'
34
'
50
'
INSTALL SPEED HUMP (TYP.)
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
WOODBRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
CONNECT TO EXISTING BROAD/WOODBRIDGE
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID CROSSING
34
'
50
'
34
'
50
'
INSTALL SPEED HUMP (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
6 7
EX-06
Attachment B (Page 25 of 26)
KING CT
MEADOW
PARK
MEADOW PARK PATH
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY
MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
EXISTING BICYCLE RAMP
TO MEADOW PARK
(INSTALLED MAY 2023)
60
'
40
'
KING CT KING ST
SO
U
T
H
S
T
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL SPEED HUMP
(TYP.)INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL (AS
PART OF SEPARATE CITY
PROJECT)
60
'
40
'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
7 7
EX-07
Attachment B (Page 26 of 26)
HI
G
U
E
R
A
S
T
BRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
60
'
39
'
52
'
40
'
BRIDGE ST
BE
E
B
E
E
S
T
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
56
'
39
'
56
'
40
'
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
MAT
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
1 7
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
EX-01
NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY GUIDE SIGNAGE TO
BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT GREENWAY ROUTE
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
Attachment C (Page 1 of 7)
BRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
57
'
40
'
56
'
40
'
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
BRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
R
/
W
R
/
W
EXISTING SHARED
U
S
E
P
A
T
H
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
INSTALL BIKE RAMP TO
EXISTING PATH
INSTALL SPEED
HUMP (TYP.)
INSTALL FLOATING CURB
EXTENSIONS WITH TRAIL
CROSSING SIGNAGE (W11-15)
NEW MIDBLOCK
CROSSWALK
60'
40'
60'
60
'
40
'
40'
INSTALL SOLAR
PATH LIGHT
INSTALL SOLAR
PATH LIGHT
10'
10'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MATCH LINE
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
2 7
EX-02
Attachment C (Page 2 of 7)
EXPOSITION DR
MEADOW PARK
SHARED USE PATHS
R/W
R/W
R
/
W
R
/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GREEN
WAY
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GREEN
WAY
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL SPEED HUMP
(TYP.)
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
NEW CROSSWALK
EXISTING BICYCLE RAMP STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
60
'
40
'
60
'
56'
36'
40
'
60
'
40
'
CORRIDA DR
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
CORRIDA DR
MA
D
R
I
D
C
T
R/W
R/W
R/W
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
5
6
'
3
6
'
5
6
'
3
6
'
56
'
36
'
C
O
R
R
I
D
A
D
R
MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
3 7
EX-03
Attachment C (Page 3 of 7)
CORRIDA DR CORRIDA DR
SE
N
D
E
R
O
S
T
BA
N
D
E
R
O
L
A
CT
ME
A
D
O
W
PA
R
K
PA
T
H
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY
MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
36
'
56
'
36
'
CONSTRUCT BIKE RAMP
INSTALL RED CURB
PAINT FOR IMPROVED
VISIBILITY (TYP.)
CORRIDA DR
GA
N
A
D
O
R
C
T
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
56
'
36
'
36
'
56
'
COR
R
I
D
A
D
R
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
4 7
EX-04
Attachment C (Page 4 of 7)
WOODBRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
R/
W R/
W
R/
W
R/W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
S
P
E
E
D
H
U
M
P
(
T
Y
P
.
)
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
NEW CROSSWALK
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSION TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES
6
0
'
4
0
'
60
'
56'
36'
40
'
60
'
C
O
R
R
I
D
A
D
R
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
WOODBR
I
D
G
E
S
T
ME
A
D
O
W
S
T
MEADOW PARK
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
IN
S
T
A
L
L
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
H
O
O
D
GR
E
E
N
W
A
Y
M
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
AN
D
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
(
T
Y
P
.
)
INSTALL SPEED HUMP (TYP.)
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSIONS TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES (TYP.)
NEW CROSSWALK (TYP.)
34
'
50
'
6
0
'
4
0
'
CONSTRUCT BIKE RAMP INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
N
E
X
T
S
H
E
E
T
MATCH LINE - SEE PREVIOUS SHEET
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
5 7
EX-05
Attachment C (Page 5 of 7)
WOODBRIDGE ST
LA
W
T
O
N
A
V
E
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
STRIPED CURB
EXTENSIONS TO SLOW
TURNING VEHICLES (TYP.)
NEW CROSSWALK (TYP.)
34
'
50
'
34
'
50
'
INSTALL SPEED HUMP (TYP.)
INSTALL RED CURB PAINT FOR
IMPROVED VISIBILITY (TYP.)
WOODBRIDGE ST
R/W
R/W
CONNECT TO EXISTING BROAD/WOODBRIDGE
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID CROSSING
34
'
50
'
34
'
50
'
INSTALL SPEED HUMP (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
S
H
E
E
T
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
6 7
EX-06
Attachment C (Page 6 of 7)
KING CT
MEADOW
PARK
MEADOW PARK PATH
R/W
R/W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY
MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
EXISTING BICYCLE RAMP
TO MEADOW PARK
(INSTALLED MAY 2023)
60
'
40
'
KING CT KING ST
SO
U
T
H
S
T
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
GR
E
E
N
WA
Y
INSTALL SPEED HUMP
(TYP.)INSTALL NEIGHBORHOOD
GREENWAY MARKINGS
AND SIGNAGE (TYP.)
NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL (AS
PART OF SEPARATE CITY
PROJECT)
60
'
40
'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
----
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
VH
JP
JG
May 24
1"=20'
2021-206_C-PLN_GREENWAY.dwg
CO
N
C
E
P
T
D
E
S
I
G
N
S
·CURRENT CONCEPT DESIGNS ARE PRELIMINARY
AND PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL
DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE GUIDED BASED ON
COMMUNITY INPUT AND FURTHER ENGINEERING
REVIEW.
NOTES:
BUS
STOP
7 7
EX-07
Attachment C (Page 7 of 7)
149+00 150+00 151+00 152+00 153+00
MADONNA RD
CITY R/W
CALTRANS R/W
US 101 SB RAMPS
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
5'
7'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
5'
7'
10
'
10
'
10
'
11
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
BICYCLE CROSSING WITH BICYCLE SIGNAL
PHASE, INCLUDE CONFLICT MARKINGS
BICYCLE CROSSING MARKINGS TO
INDICATE DIRECTIONALITY OF CROSSING
WITH BICYCLE SIGNAL PHASE
BICYCLE CROSSING TO RUN WITH
VEHICULAR THROUGH TRAFFIC,
INCLUDE BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
EXISTING CLASS I SIDEPATH
WITH BLENDED CURB RAMP
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
WESTBOUND THROUGH TRAVEL LANES
TO BE REDUCED FROM 3 TO 2
BICYCLE CROSSING MARKINGS TO
INDICATE DIRECTIONALITY OF CROSSING
WITH BICYCLE SIGNAL PHASE
SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE REVISED LANE
ALIGNMENTS AND BIKE SIGNAL PHASE(I.E. REPLACE LOOPS WITH
VIDEO DETECTION, INSTALL BIKE SIGNAL HEADS, BLANK OUT SIGNS TO
RESTRICT RIGHT TURNS ON RED DURING BIKE SIGNAL PHASE, ETC.)
153+00 154+00 155+00 156+00 157+00 158+00
MADONNA RD
US101
2'
11
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
2'
8'
5'
4'
6'
WESTBOUND THROUGH TRAVEL
LANES TO BE REDUCED FROM 3 TO 2
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
FORM OF CLASS IV BIKEWAY SEPARATION APPROACHING
AND ALONG BRIDGE TO BE CONFIRMED WITH CALTRANS
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
"
M
"
S
T
A
1
5
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
5
8
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
5
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CONST. CL
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
VH
Apr. 23, 24
1"=20'
2021-206_EXH_Directional Alt.dwg
1 3
MA
D
O
N
N
A
R
O
A
D
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
1
DI
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
B
I
K
E
W
A
Y
S
CONST. CL
·CONCEPT DESIGNS PROVIDED FOR DISCUSSION
PURPOSES ONLY. PLANS ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
·WORK INCLUDES SLURRY SEAL FOR ALL AC PAVEMENT
ALONG MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US 101 SB RAMPS
INTERSECTION AND HIGUERA STREET.
GENERAL NOTES:
Attachment D (Page 1 of 6)
158+00 159+00 160+00 161+00 162+00 163+00
MADONNA RD
US101
CI
T
Y
R
/
W
CA
L
T
R
A
N
S
R
/
W
US 101 NB ON-RAMP
US 101 NB OFF-RAMP
2'
11
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
2'
11
'
5'
6'
4'11
'
10
.
5
'
4.
6
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
2'
6'
FORM OF CLASS IV BIKEWAY SEPARATION APPROACHING
AND ALONG BRIDGE TO BE CONFIRMED WITH CALTRANS
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
UPGRADE CROSSWALK
TO HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
SETBACK PROTECTED QUEUING
AREA FOR BICYCLISTS
CURBED MEDIAN ISLAND
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
CLASS IV PROTECTED
BIKEWAY WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
INSTALL BICYCLE
CONFLICT MARKINGS
INSTALL BICYCLE
CONFLICT MARKINGS
REPLACE INDUCTIVE LOOPS
WITH VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEM
163+00 164+00 165+00 166+00
MADONNA RD
MADONNA RD
CONST. CL
5'
2'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
2'
5'
8'
10
'
2'
6'
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFERCURBED MEDIAN ISLAND
BREAK IN CONCRETE
BUFFER FOR FIRE
HYDRANT ACCESS
INSTALL BICYCLE CONFLICT MARKINGS
10
.
5
'
11
'
2'
6'
10
.
5
'
11
'
4'6'
10
.
5
'
11
'
2'
6'
10
'
10
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
10
'
6'
3.
5
'
2'
5'
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
VH
Apr. 23, 24
1"=20'
2021-206_EXH_Directional Alt.dwg
2 3
MA
D
O
N
N
A
R
O
A
D
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
1
DI
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
B
I
K
E
W
A
Y
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
6
+
5
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
3
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
5
8
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
CONST. CL CONST. CL
·CONCEPT DESIGNS PROVIDED FOR DISCUSSION
PURPOSES ONLY. PLANS ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
·WORK INCLUDES SLURRY SEAL FOR ALL AC PAVEMENT
ALONG MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US 101 SB RAMPS
INTERSECTION AND HIGUERA STREET.
GENERAL NOTES:
Attachment D (Page 2 of 6)
110
+
0
0
111
+
0
0
112
+
0
0
113
+
0
0
167+00 168+00 169+00 170+00 171+00 171+23
MADONNA RD
5'
1.
7
5
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
2'
5'
BREAK IN CONCRETE
BUFFER FOR DRIVEWAY
ACCESS
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
CLASS IV PROTECTED BIKEWAY
WITH CONCRETE BUFFER
CLOSE EXISTING SLIP LANES
RAMP DOWN BIKE LANE
TO STREET LEVEL
BICYCLE-PEDESTRIAN MIXING
ZONE WITH COLORED PAVEMENT
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
NEW PLANTING AREA
BLENDED SHARED
USE CURB RAMP
INSTALL BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
PARALLEL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
SIGNALIZED CROSSINGS
TWO-STAGE BICYCLE TURN BOX
CLOSE EXISTING SLIP LANE
RAMP UP BIKE LANE
TO SIDEWALK LEVEL
RAMP DOWN BIKE LANE
TO STREET LEVEL
BICYCLE-PEDESTRIAN MIXING
ZONE WITH COLORED PAVEMENT
NEW PLANTING AREA
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
BLENDED SHARED
USE CURB RAMP
RAMP UP BIKE LANE
TO SIDEWALK LEVEL
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
VH
Apr. 23, 24
1"=20'
2021-206_EXH_Directional Alt.dwg
3 3
MA
D
O
N
N
A
R
O
A
D
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
1
DI
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
B
I
K
E
W
A
Y
S
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
6
+
5
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
CONST. CL
·CONCEPT DESIGNS PROVIDED FOR DISCUSSION
PURPOSES ONLY. PLANS ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
·WORK INCLUDES SLURRY SEAL FOR ALL AC PAVEMENT
ALONG MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US 101 SB RAMPS
INTERSECTION AND HIGUERA STREET.
GENERAL NOTES:
Attachment D (Page 3 of 6)
149+00 150+00 151+00 152+00 153+00
MADONNA RD
US 101 SB RAMPS
12
'
7'
11
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
5'
CITY R/W
CALTRANS R/W
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
EXISTING CLASS I SIDEPATH
WITH BLENDED CURB RAMP
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
WESTBOUND THROUGH TRAVEL LANES
TO BE REDUCED FROM 3 TO 2CLASS IV PROTECTED
TWO-WAY BIKEWAY WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
BICYCLE CROSSING
WITH BICYCLE SIGNAL
PHASE AND CONFLICT
MARKINGS
TWO-STAGE BICYCLE TURN BOX TO ALLOW EASTBOUND
BICYCLISTS TO CROSS TO THE TWO-WAY FACILITY.INSTALL WAYFINDING SIGN
DIRECTING BICYCLISTS TO
TWO-WAY FACILITY
SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
REVISED LANE ALIGNMENTS AND BIKE SIGNAL PHASE
(I.E. REPLACE LOOPS WITH VIDEO DETECTION, INSTALL
BIKE SIGNAL HEADS, BLANK OUT SIGNS TO RESTRICT
RIGHT TURNS ON RED DURING BIKE SIGNAL PHASE, ETC.)
10
'
10
'
10
'
11
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
153+00 154+00 155+00 156+00 157+00 158+00
MADONNA RD
10
.
5
'
11
'
2'
8'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
7'
10
.
5
'
WESTBOUND THROUGH TRAVEL
LANES TO BE REDUCED FROM 3 TO 2
FORM OF CLASS IV BIKEWAY SEPARATION APPROACHING
AND ALONG BRIDGE TO BE CONFIRMED WITH CALTRANS
CLASS IV PROTECTED
TWO-WAY BIKEWAY WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
"
M
"
S
T
A
1
5
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
LE
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
5
8
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
5
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
CONST. CL
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
VH
Apr. 24, 24
1"=20'
2021-206_EXH_Two-Way Alt.dwg
1 3
MA
D
O
N
N
A
R
O
A
D
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
2
BI
D
I
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
B
I
K
E
W
A
Y
CONST. CL
CONST. CL
·CONCEPT DESIGNS PROVIDED FOR DISCUSSION
PURPOSES ONLY. PLANS ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
·WORK INCLUDES SLURRY SEAL FOR ALL AC PAVEMENT
ALONG MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US 101 SB RAMPS
INTERSECTION AND HIGUERA STREET.
GENERAL NOTES:
Attachment D (Page 4 of 6)
158+00 159+00 160+00 161+00 162+00 163+00
MADONNA RD
US 101 NB ON-RAMP
US 101 NB OFF-RAMP
8'
2'11
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
10
.
5
'
11
'
9'
8'
4'
CI
T
Y
R
/
W
CA
L
T
R
A
N
S
R
/
W
4'
10
'
10
'
5'
10
'
10
'
4'
8'
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
UPGRADE CROSSWALK
TO HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS
FORM OF CLASS IV BIKEWAY SEPARATION APPROACHING
AND ALONG BRIDGE TO BE CONFIRMED WITH CALTRANS
BICYCLE CROSSING
WITH BICYCLE SIGNAL
PHASE AND CONFLICT
MARKINGSCLASS IV PROTECTED TWO-WAY BIKEWAY
CONCRETE PROTECTION ISLAND
SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE REVISED LANE
ALIGNMENTS AND BIKE SIGNAL PHASE (I.E. REPLACE LOOPS WITH
VIDEO DETECTION, INSTALL BIKE SIGNAL HEADS, BLANK OUT SIGNS TO
RESTRICT RIGHT TURNS ON RED DURING BIKE SIGNAL PHASE, ETC.)
10
'
163+00 164+00 165+00 166+00
MADONNA RD
MADONNA RD
10
'
10
'
4'
8'
10
'
7'
10
'
10
'
10
'
3'
10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
UPGRADE CROSSWALK TO HIGH
VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
CLASS IV PROTECTED
TWO-WAY BIKEWAY WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
CLASS IV PROTECTED
TWO-WAY BIKEWAY WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
TWO-WAY CENTER
LEFT TURN LANE
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
VH
Apr. 24, 24
1"=20'
2021-206_EXH_Two-Way Alt.dwg
2 3
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
6
+
5
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
3
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
3
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
5
8
+
0
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
1
MA
D
O
N
N
A
R
O
A
D
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
2
BI
D
I
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
B
I
K
E
W
A
Y
CONST. CL
CONST. CL
·CONCEPT DESIGNS PROVIDED FOR DISCUSSION
PURPOSES ONLY. PLANS ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
·WORK INCLUDES SLURRY SEAL FOR ALL AC PAVEMENT
ALONG MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US 101 SB RAMPS
INTERSECTION AND HIGUERA STREET.
GENERAL NOTES:
Attachment D (Page 5 of 6)
110
+
0
0
111
+
0
0
112
+
0
0
113
+
0
0
167+00 168+00 169+00 170+00 171+00 171+23
MADONNA RD
8'
4'10
'
10
'
10
'
10
'
12
'
10
'
10
'
8
'
BREAK IN CONCRETE
BUFFER FOR DRIVEWAY
ACCESS
CLOSE EXISTING SLIP LANES
CLOSE EXISTING SLIP LANE
RAMP FOR
BIDIRECTIONAL
BIKEWAY
RAMP UP BIKE LANE
TO SIDEWALK LEVELBICYCLE-PEDESTRIAN MIXING
ZONE WITH COLORED PAVEMENT
INSTALL BICYCLE CONFLICT
MARKINGS
TWO-WAY CENTER
LEFT TURN LANE
CLASS IV PROTECTED
TWO-WAY BIKEWAY WITH
CONCRETE BUFFER
CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK
CURB EXTENSION
NEW PLANTING AREA
NEW PLANTING AREA
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
PARALLEL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
SIGNALIZED CROSSINGS
INSTALL TWO-STAGE
BICYCLE TURN BOX
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.
DATE:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
:
of
SHEET NO.
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SCALE:
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
HI
G
U
E
R
A
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DV
DV
VH
Apr. 24, 24
1"=20'
2021-206_EXH_Two-Way Alt.dwg
3 3
MA
D
O
N
N
A
R
O
A
D
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
2
BI
D
I
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
C
L
A
S
S
I
V
B
I
K
E
W
A
Y
SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
020 2010 40
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
-
S
T
A
1
6
6
+
5
0
,
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
CONST. CL
·CONCEPT DESIGNS PROVIDED FOR DISCUSSION
PURPOSES ONLY. PLANS ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
·WORK INCLUDES SLURRY SEAL FOR ALL AC PAVEMENT
ALONG MADONNA ROAD BETWEEN THE US 101 SB RAMPS
INTERSECTION AND HIGUERA STREET.
GENERAL NOTES:
Attachment D (Page 6 of 6)