Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/8/2024 Item 5b, LaBarre (following meeting) From:CityClerk Sent:Friday, May 17, 2024 11:00 AM To:Aaron LaBarre Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); McClish, Teresa; Wiberg, Daisy Subject:LaBarre (Comments on GENP – 0175-2024) PC 05-08-2024 Agenda Item 5b Aaron LaBarre, Thank you for taking the time to contact the Planning Commission (PC) on this topic. This item came before the PC at their May 8, 2024 meeting. Linked below is the Agenda for that meeting. At that link you can view the meeting video as well as see the staff correspondence and staff report which detail st their purview. Note that the County Supervisors will hear this item at their upcoming May 21 meeting (link provided to their web page below). Planning Commission - May 08, 2024 (escribemeetings.com) Home - County of San Luis Obispo (ca.gov) City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 slocity.org Bcc: PCC Members and Staff From: Aaron LaBarre < Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 9:24 AM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Comments on GENP – 0175-2024 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. To whom it may concern at the planning commission. The planning commission, City Council and Mayor, need to consider the optimal, proper land use, in this neighborhood, compared to the proposed project. I support the legal opinions expressed in the attached petition by Grant Robbins. It does not appear the application or the Planning Department has exercised its obligation to ensure that the propose project fits within existing the neighborhood’s theme and zoning to preserve the neighborhood of single-family 1 residences. The proposed location or for that manner, any of the open lots in the vicinity should have single family or multifamily private residences as the preferred option in this neighborhood as it is within half a mile to the elementary school, Scheimer Park and pool and the YMCA and recreational baseball fields. All neighborhood development should be considering families who are raising the next generation. The extreme intensified proposed development does not fit the overall theme of the neighborhood and is something that the city planning department should be taking a strong stance to preserve. According to the news article, the proposed project was originally planned for Prado and Higuera which is close to County social services, Which seems more appropriate for several reasons, Including compatible development in the commercial zone, reduced city traffic and pollution which is close to the highway, etc. Aaron LaBarre Property owner within the city of San Luis Obispo. 2