HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-9079 Calling for General Municipal Election on November 7, 2000 for Proposed Charter Amendment - Citizen Initiative\` U
RESOLUTION NO. 9079 (2000 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2000, FOR THE
SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT(CITIZEN- INITIATED)
WHEREAS, pursuant to authority provided by Article XI of the Constitution and Title 4,
Division 2, Chapter 3 of the Government Code and Division 9, Chapter 3, Article 3
(commencing at § 9255) of the Election Code of the State of California, a petition has been filed
with the legislative body of the City of San Luis Obispo signed by more than fifteen per cent of
the registered voters of the City according to the County Election Department's last official
report of registration to the Secretary of State to submit a proposed charter amendment to the
voters; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized and directed by statute to submit the
proposed charter amendment to the voters;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California, does resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1: That pursuant to Article XI of the Constitution and Title 4, Division 2,
Chapter 3 of the Government Code and Division 9, Chapter 3, Article 3 (commencing at § 9255)
of the Election Code of the State of California, there is called and ordered to be held to be in the
City of San Luis Obispo, California, on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, a General Municipal
Election for the purpose of submitting the following proposed charter amendment:
Measure S
Yes
Shall the San Luis Obispo City Charter be amended to provide that
disputes about wages, hours and other terms and conditions of --�-�-
employment that cannot be resolved by negotiations between the City and
the Police Officers' Association and the Firefighters' Union be subject to No
binding arbitration that is final without City Council or voter approval?
SECTION 2. That the text of the charter amendment submitted to the voters is attached
as Exhibit A.
SECTION 3. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as
required by law.
R 9079
Resolution No. 9079 (2000 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 4. That the polls shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election
and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when
the polls shall be closed, except as provided in § 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of
California.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this
resolution with the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors and Clerk- Recorder.
On motion of Council Member Ewan, seconded by Council Member Schwartz, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Member Ewan, Vice Mayor Schwartz, and Mayor Settle
None
Council Members Marx and Romero
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted i
Lee Pnce,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M 21,
Mayor Allen K. Settle
\ J
Resolution No. 9079 (2000 Series)
EXHIBIT A
Page 1
FULL TEXT OF MEASURE S
A Measure Amending The City Charter To Require That Labor Disputes Between
The City Of San Luis Obispo And The Police Officers' Association And Firefighters' Association
Be Resolved By Binding Arbitration.
Section 1107 Impartial and Binding Arbitration For San Luis Obispo Police Officers
Association and San Luis Obispo Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 3523, Employee
Disputes.
(a) Declaration of Policy. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo
that strikes by firefighters and police officers are not in the public interest and should be
prohibited, and that a method should be adopted for peacefully and equitably resolving disputes
that might otherwise lead to such strikes.
(b) Prohibition Against Strikes. No City of San Luis Obispo firefighter or police officers shall
willfully engage in a strike against the City. Any such employee against whom the City brings
charges of failing to report for work as part of a strike shall be subject to dismissal from his or
her employment in the event the charges are sustained upon conclusion of the proceedings that
are required by law for the imposition of disciplinary action upon said employee.
(c) Obligation to Negotiate in Good Faith. The City, through its duly authorized representatives,
shall negotiate in good faith with the San Luis Obispo Police Officers Association and/or the San
Luis Obispo Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 3523, as the exclusive representatives of
representation units comprised solely of employees of the police department and/or the fire
department, as such units are currently constituted or as they may be amended through
negotiation or arbitration as provided in this section, on all matters relating to the wages, hours,
and other terms and conditions of City employment. Unless and until agreement is reached
through negotiations between authorized representatives of the City and said employee
organization or organizations or a determination is made through the impartial arbitration
procedure hereinafter provided, no existing benefit, term or condition of employment for
employees represented by the San Luis Obispo Police Officers Association and/or the San Luis
Obispo Firefighters Association, IAFF Local 3523, shall be altered, eliminated or changed.
l�
(d) Impasse Resolution Procedures.
Resolution No. 9079 (2000 Series)
EXHIBIT A
Page 2
(1) All disputes, controversies and grievances pertaining to wages, hours or terms and conditions
of City employment which remain unresolved after good faith negotiations between the City and
said employee organization shall be submitted to a three member Board of Arbitrators upon the
declaration of an impasse by the City or by said employee organization. Upon declaration of
impasse by either party, the City and employee organization shall each exchange a written last
offer of settlement on each of the issues remaining in dispute. Written last offer of settlement
shall be exchanged between parties within two days of the declaration of impasse.
(2) Representatives designated by the City and representatives of the employee organization shall
each select and appoint one arbitrator to the Board of Arbitrators within three (3) business days
after either party has notified the other, in writing, of the declaration of impasse and the desire to
proceed to arbitration. The third member of the Board of Arbitrators shall be selected by
agreement between the City's and the employee's organization representative within ten (10)
business days of the declaration of impasse. This third member shall serve as the neutral
arbitrator and Chairperson of the Board. In the event that the City and the employee organization
cannot agree upon the selection of the neutral arbitrator within ten (10) business days from the
date that either party has notified the other that it has declared an impasse, either party may then
request the State Mediation and Conciliation Service of the State of California Department of
Industrial Relations to provide a list of seven (7) persons who are qualified and experienced as
labor arbitrators. If the arbitrators selected by the City and the employee organization cannot
agree within three (3) days after receipt of such list on one of the seven (7) to act as the third
arbitrator, they shall have five (5) business days to alternately strike names, with the City's
arbitrator striking first, from the list of nominees until one name remains and that person shall
then become the neutral arbitrator and Chairperson of the Board of Arbitrators.
(3) Any arbitration proceeding convened pursuant to this Article shall be conducted in
conformance with, subject to, and governed by Title 9 of Part 3 of the California Code of Civil
Procedure. The Board of Arbitrators shall hold public hearings, receive evidence from the parties
and cause a transcript of the proceedings to be prepared. The Board of Arbitrators may adopt by
unanimous consent such other procedures that are designed to encourage an agreement between
the parties, expedite the arbitration hearing process, or reduce the costs of the arbitration process.
(4) In the event no agreement is reached prior to the conclusion of the arbitration hearings, the
Board of Arbitrators shall direct each of the parties to submit, within such time limit as the Board
of Arbitrators may establish, but not to exceed thirty (30) business days, a last offer of settlement
on each of the remaining issues in dispute. The Board of Arbitrators shall decide each issue by
majority vote by selecting whichever last offer of settlement on that issue it finds most nearly
Resolution No. 9079 (2000 Series)
EXHIBIT A
Page 3
conforms to those factors traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of wages,
hours, benefits and terms and conditions of public and private employment, including, but not
limited to the following: changes in the average consumer price index for goods and services
using the San Francisco - Oakland -San Jose index, as reported at the time impasse is declared for
the preceding twelve (12) months, the wages, hours, benefits and terms and conditions of
employment of employees performing similar services in comparable cities; and the financial
condition of the City of San Luis. Obispo and its ability to meet the costs of the decision of the
Board of Arbitrators.
(5) After reaching a decision, the Board of Arbitrators shall mail or otherwise deliver a true copy
of its decision to the parties. The decision of the Board of Arbitrators shall not be publicly
disclosed and shall not be binding until ten (10) days after it is delivered to the parties. During
that ten (10) day period the parties shall meet privately, attempt to resolve their differences, and
by mutual agreement amend or modify the decision of the Board of Arbitrators. At the
conclusion of the ten (10) day period, which may be extended by mutual agreement between the
parties, the decision of Board of Arbitrators, as it may be modified or amended by the parties,
shall be publicly disclosed and shall be binding on the parties. The City and the employee
organization shall take whatever action is necessary to carry out and effectuate the arbitration
award. No other actions by the City Council or by the electorate to conform or approve the
decision of the Board of Arbitrators shall be permitted or required.
(6) The expenses of any arbitration proceeding convened pursuant to this Article, including the
fee for the services of the chairperson of the Board of Arbitrators and the costs of preparation of
the transcript of the proceedings shall be borne equally by the parties. The expenses of the
arbitration, which the parties may incur individually, are to be borne by the party incurring such
expenses. Such expenses include, but are not limited to, the expense of calling a party's
witnesses, the costs incurred in gathering data and compiling reports, and any expenses incurred
by the party's arbitrator. The parties may mutually agree to divide the costs in another manner.
(7) The proceedings described herein shall supercede the dispute resolution process for the San
Luis Obispo Police Officers Association and the San Luis Obispo Firefighters Association which
is set forth in Sections 13.2 and 14.1 of City of San Luis Obispo Resolution No. 6620, to the
extent that such language is in conflict with this amendment. Furthermore, the proceedings
described herein shall supercede any language within the Employer - Employee Resolution, the
Personnel Rules and Regulations, any Memorandum of Agreement with the employee
associations or any written policy or procedure relating to wages, hours or other terms and
conditions of City employment, to the extent that such language is in conflict with this
amendment. However, nothing in this section shall preclude the parties from mutually agreeing
to use dispute resolution processes other than the binding arbitration process herein set forth.
Nor, does it preclude the parties from negotiating, and submitting to the arbitration process set
forth herein, a grievance process, which includes a form of binding arbitration that differs from
the one, set forth herein.
ob