HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-24-2024 TC Agenda Packet
Tree Committee
AGENDA
Monday, June 24, 2024, 5:30 p.m.
Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
The Tree Committee holds in-person meetings. Zoom participation will not be supported at this time.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT:
Public Comment prior to the meeting (must be received 3 hours in advance of the meeting):
Mail - Delivered by the U.S. Postal Service. Address letters to the City Clerk's Office at 990
Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, 93401.
Email - Submit Public Comments via email to advisorybodies@slocity.org. In the body of your
email, please include the date of the meeting and the item number (if applicable). Emails will not
be read aloud during the meeting.
Voicemail - Call (805) 781-7164 and leave a voicemail. Please state and spell your name, the
agenda item number you are calling about, and leave your comment. Verbal comments must be
limited to 3 minutes. Voicemails will not be played during the meeting.
*All correspondence will be archived and distributed to members, however, submissions received
after the deadline ma not be processed until the following day.
Public Comment during the meeting:
Meetings are held in-person. To provide public comment during the meeting, you must be
present at the meeting location.
Electronic Visual Aid Presentation. To conform with the City's Network Access and Use Policy,
Chapter 1.3.8 of the Council Policies & Procedures Manual, members of the public who desire
to utilize electronic visual aids to supplement their oral presentation are encouraged to provide
display-ready material to the City Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Contact the
City Clerk's Office at cityclerk@slocity.org or (805) 781-7114.
Pages
1.CALL TO ORDER
Chair Elizabeth Lucas will call the Regular Meeting of the Tree Committee to
order.
2.PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
The public is encouraged to submit comments on any subject within the
jurisdiction of the Tree Committee that does not appear on this agenda.
Although the Committee will not take action on items presented during the
Public Comment Period, the Chair may direct staff to place an item on a future
agenda for discussion.
3.CONSENT
Matters appearing on the Consent Calendar are expected to be non-
controversial and will be acted upon at one time. A member of the public may
request the Tree Committee to pull an item for discussion. The public may
comment on any and all items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute
time limit.
3.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - MAY 20, 2024 TREE COMMITTEE
MINUTES
5
Recommendation:
To approve the Tree Committee Minutes of May 20, 2024.
4.TREE REMOVAL APPEALS
Any person aggrieved by an act or determination of the authorized approving
authority exercising the authority herein granted shall have the right to appeal
the decision of the authorized approving authority as set forth in Section
12.24.180 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. Appeals received by
the City Clerk within ten calendar days from the date of determination or act
shall cause the director to withhold tree removal permits and any permits for
construction or demolition actively relying on the subject tree removal until the
appeal is heard and a decision is reached.
4.a REVIEW A TREE REMOVAL APPEAL OF THE CITY ARBORIST’S
DECISION TO DENY REMOVAL OF TWO (2) SHAMEL ASH
(FRAXINUS UHDEI) TREES LOCATED AT 2125 STORY STREET, IN
THE PARKWAY NEAR CORNER OF SANDERCOCK AND STORY
9
Recommendation:
Review a Tree Removal Appeal of the City Arborist’s decision to deny
tree removals based on consistency with the City’s Tree Regulations
and reach a final decision to either uphold the Arborist’s decision or
approve the removal with a compensatory replanting plan.
5.TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION
5.a REVIEW A TREE REMOVAL CONVENIENCE APPLICATION TO
REMOVE ONE (1) LONDON PLANE TREE (PLANTANUS X
ACERFOLIA) (HISPANICA) LOCATED AT 4275 POINSETTIA STREET
31
Recommendation:
Review the Tree Removal Application, removal based on convenience,
and the landscaping/compensatory replanting plan and provide a
recommendation to the Community Development Director for final
action.
6.COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
6.a ARBORIST REPORT
Receive a brief update from Urban Forest Program Coordinator / City
Arborist Walter Gault.
7.ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the Tree Committee meeting is scheduled for July
22, 2024 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street,
San Luis Obispo.
LISTENING ASSISTIVE DEVICES are available -- see the Clerk
The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible
to the public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate
alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who
requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting
should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 781-7114 at least
48 hours before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications Device for the
Deaf (805) 781-7410.
Agenda related writings or documents provided to the Tree Committee are
available for public inspection on the City’s website:
https://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-and-
minutes. Meeting video recordings can be found on the City’s website:
http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=61087&dbid=0&repo=CityCl
erk
1
Tree Committee Minutes
May 20, 2024, 5:30 p.m.
Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Tree Committee
Members Present:
Member Alan Bate, Member Henry Bonifas, Member Daniel
Canella, Member Emily Rosten, Vice Chair Ben Parker, Chair
Elizabeth Lucas
Tree Committee
Members Absent:
Member Brian Pineda
City Staff Present: Urban Forest Program Coordinator / City Arborist Walter Gault,
Deputy City Clerk Megan Wilbanks
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER
A Special Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Tree Committee was called to order on
May 20, 2024 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm
Street, San Luis Obispo, by Chair Lucas.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA
Public Comment:
None
--End of Public Comment--
3. CONSENT
3.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - MARCH 25, 2024 TREE COMMITTEE
MINUTES
Motion By Vice Chair Parker
Second By Member Rosten
To approve the Tree Committee Minutes of March 25, 2024.
Page 5 of 45
2
4. TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION
4.a 10 HIGUERA ST (ARCH-0358-2023) REVIEW REQUEST TO REMOVE
TWO TREES AND REPLANT 25 TREES AS PART OF A NEW MIXED-
USE PROJECT THAT CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 23,164 SQUARE
FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, A ONE BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL
UNIT, AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Senior Planner Rachel Cohen provided an overview of the Tree Removal
Application and responded to Committee inquiries.
Chair Lucas opened Public Comment
Public Comment:
None
--End of Public Comment--
Chair Lucas closed Public Comment
Motion By Member Canella
Second By Vice Chair Parker
Recommend the Planning Commission approve the Tree Removal
Application to remove two (2) Peruvian pepper (Schinus mole) trees and
replant 25 trees, as part of a new mixed-use project located at 10 Higuera
Street, with the following direction:
The applicant should consider replacing the proposed twelve (12)
Marina Strawberry trees (Arbutus) with an alternate species from
the City's Master Tree List, with the goal of maximizing canopy
potential. The Committee notes that Strawberry trees are not well
suited for high traffic areas, due to messy leaf and fruit litter, which
requires constant cleanup / maintenance and, even at maturity, the
species will not provide sufficient canopy coverage.
Ayes (6): Member Bate, Member Bonifas, Member Canella, Member
Rosten, Vice Chair Parker, and Chair Lucas
Absent (1): Member Pineda
CARRIED (6 to 0)
Page 6 of 45
3
5. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
Motion By Vice Chair Parker
Second By Member Bate
Elect Elizabeth Lucas to the position of Chair for a one-year term.
Ayes (6): Member Bate, Member Bonifas, Member Canella, Member Rosten,
Vice Chair Parker, and Chair Lucas
Absent (1): Member Pineda
CARRIED (6 to 0)
Motion By Member Bate
Second By Member Rosten
Elect Ben Parker to the position of Vice Chair for a one-year term.
Ayes (6): Member Bate, Member Bonifas, Member Canella, Member Rosten,
Vice Chair Parker, and Chair Lucas
Absent (1): Member Pineda
CARRIED (6 to 0)
6. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
6.a ARBORIST REPORT
Urban Forest Program Coordinator / City Arborist Walter Gault provided
the following update:
Currently under review, is a Tree Removal Application from San
Luis Ranch to remove 18 trees. The removal application will be
presented to the Tree Committee at an upcoming meeting, most
likely July 22, 2024.
Staff is working to get more street trees planted along Dalidio Drive
in the San Luis Ranch development.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:08 p.m. The next Regular Meeting of the Tree
Committee is scheduled for June 24, 2024 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing
Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo.
_________________________
APPROVED BY TREE COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2024
Page 7 of 45
Page 8 of 45
TREE COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: REVIEW A TREE REMOVAL APPEAL OF THE CITY ARBORIST’S
DECISION TO DENY REMOVAL OF TWO (2) SHAMEL ASH (FRAXINUS UHDEI)
TREES LOCATED AT 2125 STORY STREET, IN THE PARKWAY NEAR CORNER OF
SANDERCOCK AND STORY
FILE NUMBER: APPL-0289-2024 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2125 STORY ST
FROM: Walter Gault, Urban Forestry
Program Coordinator / City Arborist
Phone Number: (805) 781-7578
Email: wgault@slocity.org
APPELLANT: Chris Bonin
REPRESENTATIVE: Dave Lasserre
RECOMMENDATION
Review a Tree Removal Appeal of the City Arborist’s decision to deny tree removals
based on consistency with the City’s Tree Regulations and reach a final decision to either
uphold the Arborist’s decision or approve the removal with a compensatory replanting
plan.
1.0 APPEAL DESCRIPTION
Chris Bonin (Appellant) of San Luis Coastal
Unified School District, has appealed a
denial of tree removal at Hawthorne
Elementary School. On 4/23/24, a tree
removal application for Tree Health and
Hazard Mitigation of (2) two Fraxinus uhdei
(Shamel Ash) trees at 2125 Story Street
was received. On 5/14/24 the City Arborist
denied the request because it did not
conform to circumstances outlined in
Municipal Code Section 12.24.090(E)(1)(a-
g). Sidewalk repair and pruning were
recommended alternatives to alleviate the
concerns of the applicant. On 5/22/24,
Chris Bonin appealed the decision to deny.
This appeal occurred within 10 days from
the City Arborist’s decision, and it is
appealable to the Tree Committee.
Meeting Date: 6/24/2024
Item Number: 4a
Time Estimate: 20 Minutes
Figure 1: location of (2) trees
Page 9 of 45
Item 4a
APPL-0289-2023 (2125 Story St.)
Tree Committee Report – June 24, 2024
2.0 COMMITTEE PURVIEW
The Tree Committee’s role is to review the decision and its consistency with the San Luis
Obispo Municipal Code (SLOMC) Section 12.24 (Tree Municipal Code Section
12.24.090(E)(a-g)) and provide a final decision to the appellant that either reaffirms the
City Arborist’s denial or issues an approval for removal with a compensatory replanting
plan.
3.0 TREE REGULATIONS
The City’s Tree Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 12.24) was adopted in 2010 and
recently updated in 2019 with the purpose of establishing a comprehensive program for
installing, maintaining, and preserving trees within the City. This ordinance establishes
policies, regulations, and specifications necessary to govern installation, maintenance,
removal, and preservation of trees to beautify the city; to purify the air; to provide shade
and wind protection; to add environmental and economic value; and to preserve trees
with historic or unusual value.
Criteria for Appeal of Non-Construction Related Tree Removal Recommendations.
SLOMC §12.24.180 subsection B requires review by the Tree Committee for denied tree
removal requests that have been appealed related to Tree Health and Hazard Mitigation
and make a recommendation based on criteria set forth in SLOMC §12.24.090.
Applicable criteria are provided below.
(E)(1)(a). The tree is an imminent hazard to life or property, and removing it is the
only feasible way to eliminate the hazard (see subsection (I)(2) of this section for
director approval of immediate hazard abatement without a formal application or
noticing; removals pursuant to this subsection (E)(1)(a) and subsection (I)(2) of
this section are not appealable).
(E)(1)(b). The tree is dead or dying or diseased or damaged beyond reclamation.
(E)(1)(c). The tree’s roots are causing severe damage to public or private property,
and removing the tree is the only feasible way to eliminate the damage .
(E)(1)(d). The tree is affected by structural defects and/or deficiencies that will limit
lifespan.
(E)(1)(e). The tree is densely clustered amongst other trees and the requested tree
removal promotes good arboricultural practice.
(E)(1)(f). The tree is obstructing vision, access, or mobility of public traffic (see
Section 12.24.030, Definitions; public traffic). Trees requested for removal due to
sidewalk infrastructure damage shall have lower preservation priority when the tree
species is known to have invasive root structures that increase the likelihood that
damage will recur if the tree is not approved for removal and where trees requested
for removal are adjacent to sidewalks with a high volume of pedestrian use and/or
with large vertical or slope displacements.
Page 10 of 45
Item 4a
APPL-0289-2023 (2125 Story St.)
Tree Committee Report – June 24, 2024
(E)(1)(g). The requested tree removal is necessary to alleviate a demonstrated and
ongoing maintenance burden for the property owner exceeding routine tree
maintenance.
Findings from Letter of Denial:
1. The proposed tree removal request is inconsistent with the Tree Regulations
because the proposed tree removals do not conform to the circumstances outlined
in Municipal Code Section 12.24.090(E)(1)(a-g).
a. The two trees proposed for removal are not an imminent hazard to life or
property, dead or dying, contain structural defects and/or deficiencies that
will limit lifespan, densely clustered amongst other trees, obstructing vision,
access, or mobility of public traffic, nor demonstrate an ongoing
maintenance burden for the property owner exceeding routine tree
maintenance.
b. The two trees proposed for tree removal have caused damage to the
sidewalks and curbs, but it is not severe enough to justify removal. Other
measures or strategies such as sidewalk repair and minor root pruning are
feasible alternatives that could alleviate the damage rather than removing
the trees. Although the trees are growing into overhead power, data and
fiber lines, Municipal Code Section 12.24.090(E)(1) does not list this as a
circumstance in which a tree may be removed. Pruning is a feasible
alternative that could help adjust the interaction of wires with the tree.
4.0 ACTIONS
4.1 Recommend findings of consistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending approval of the appeal based on consistency with the Tree
Regulations (SLOMC Section 12.24). An approval of the appeal should include
a compensatory replanting plan.
4.2 Recommend findings of inconsistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending denial of the appeal should include findings that cite the basis
for denial and should reference inconsistency with the General Plan, Tree
Regulations, or other policy documents.
4.3 Recommend action for continuance.
5.0 ATTACHMENTS
A - Tree Removal Application for 2125 Story St. (TREE-0200-2024)
B - Compensatory Replanting Plan 2125 Story St.
C - Tree Removal Application Denial Letter 2125 Story St.
D - Tree Removal Appeal Form for 2125 Story (APPL -0289-2024)
Page 11 of 45
Page 12 of 45
Page 13 of 45
Page 14 of 45
Page 15 of 45
Page 16 of 45
Page 17 of 45
Page 18 of 45
Page 19 of 45
Page 20 of 45
Page 21 of 45
Page 22 of 45
From: Gault, Walter
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 11:14 AM
To: David Lasserre; Niles, Nick
Cc: C Bonin
Subject: RE: Hawthorne Elementary, Tree Replan ng Schedule
Hi Dave,
Thank you for providing this replanting plan to complete your tree removal application. We will
begin processing and you should expected to hear back within 4 weeks.
Best Regards,
Walter Gault
Urban Forestry Program Coordinator / City Arborist
City of San Luis Obispo
Community Development
919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218
E wgault@slocity.org
T 805.781.7578
From: David Lasserre <dlasserre@slcusd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 1:13 PM
To: Gault, Walter <wgault@slocity.org>; Niles, Nick <NNILES@slocity.org>
Cc: C Bonin <cbonin@slcusd.org>
Subject: Hawthorne Elementary, Tree Replan ng Schedule
This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links,
or respond.
Good a ernoon Walter
Thank you for mee ng with me yesterday and sharing the city's view on tree removal and the
importance of replan ng. As I shared with you, the two large Ash trees that are located in front of
Hawthorne Elementary in the drop off and pick up area are crea ng a hazard for our students and
staff. These trees have large roots that are li ing and cracking the surrounding concrete sidewalks and
curbs crea ng a tripping hazard. Many of the upheaved sec ons of sidewalk concrete have required
high spot grinding to prevent falls and allow people with disabili es to navigate this broken
hardscape. This grinding has created areas where the concrete is becoming thinner than ideal and
may lead to even more problems in the future. Periodically these two trees drop large branches and
we are concerned that a child could be struck by falling limbs. We are also concerned that these two
trees have engulfed the power, data, and fiber lines that we rely on to provide a safe learning
environment.
Per your request we've researched exis ng tree species on or near our campus to add to our
replan ng plan. We have found Lagerstroemia Faurei (Japanese Crape Myrtle) on site, and they
Page 23 of 45
appear to do well in this area. If this is acceptable with the city we would like to plant them in
place of the removed Ash trees.
Plan ng schedule:
1 Japanese Crape Myrtle, 24" box, to replace Ash tree #1.
1 Japanese Crape Myrtle, 24" box, to replace Ash tree #2
Plan ng would take place the first week of November.
Thanks again for your me on this ma er, and please let me know If I can provide you with any other
necessary informa on.
--
Dave Lasserre
Project Manager
San Luis Coastal Unified School District
937 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
dlasserre@slcusd.org
Cell (925)360-0548
Page 24 of 45
City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development, 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3218, 805.781.7170, slocity.org
May 14, 2024 Sent via email
San Luis Coastal Unified School District
Buildings, Grounds & Transportation Department
c/o Chris Bonin
937 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Subject: TREE-0200-2024 (2125 Story Road)
Review of proposed removal of two (2) Fraxinus udei (Shamel Ash) trees
Dear Chris Bonin,
On April 23, 2024, the City received your submittal for the removal of two (2) Fraxinus udei (Shamel
Ash) trees at 2125 Story Road. The proposed tree removal request is related to Tree Health and Hazard
Mitigation and is therefore subject to Municipal Code Section 12.24.090(E). In accordance with the
Code, the proposed tree removal request is subject to City Arborist review. On May 14, 2024, I
reviewed your request and consistency of the tree removal application with city policies and standards
applicable to the site. After careful consideration, I have denied your request based on the findings
below.
Findings:
1. The proposed tree removal request is inconsistent with the Tree Regulations because the
proposed tree removals do not conform to the circumstances outlined in Municipal Code
Section 12.24.090(E)(1)(a-g).
a. The two trees proposed for removal are not an imminent hazard to life or property,
dead or dying, contain structural defects and/or deficiencies that will limit lifespan,
densely clustered amongst other trees, obstructing vision, access, or mobility of public
traffic, nor demonstrate an ongoing maintenance burden for the property owner
exceeding routine tree maintenance.
b. The two trees proposed for tree removal have caused damage to the sidewalks and
curbs, but it is not severe enough to justify removal. Other measures or strategies such
as sidewalk repair and minor root pruning are feasible alternatives that could alleviate
the damage rather than removing the trees. Although the trees are growing into
overhead power, data and fiber lines, Municipal Code Section 12.24.090(E)(1) does
not list this as a circumstance in which a tree may be removed. Pruning is a feasible
alternative that could help adjust the interaction of wires with the tree.
My action is final unless appealed within 10 calendar days from the date of the decision. Anyone may
appeal the action by submitting a letter to the Community Development Department within the time
specified. The appropriate appeal fee must accompany the appeal documentation. Appeals will be
Page 25 of 45
scheduled for the first available Tree Committee meeting date. If an appeal is filed, you will be notified
by email of the date and time of the hearing.
If you have any questions, or if you need additional information, contact me by phone at (805) 781-
7578 or by email at wgault@slocity.org.
Sincerely,
Walter Gault
City Arborist
Community Development
Page 26 of 45
@ CITTOF
sflnlulsoBrspo
Gity Staff to complete.
Note: Fee must accompany original signed appealform
Received by: YV\-a-t-l.-o'q Pr.-{r.-l Date----TI-6l>t- I zoill
TREE REMOVAL APPEAL FORM
Gommun ity Development Department
SECI/ON 1. APPELLANT INFORMATION
Chris Bonin 937 Southwood Dr. SLO CA 93401
Name
1(805)5e6-4105
Mailing Address
cbonin@slcusd.org
Phone Email
ln accordance with the procedures set forth in Ghapter 12.24.180 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal
Code, I hereby appeal the decision of the:
City Arborist- Tree Removal Application 12.24.090 (EX2) (appealed to Tree Committee)
{Appeal: $140.80
City Arborist- Tree Removal Application 12.24.090 (FX1) (appealed to the Community Development
Director)
Appeal: $140.80
Community Development Director- Tree RemovalApplication 12.24.090 (FX2) (appealed to the City
Council)
Appeal: $140.80
Community Development Director or Hearing Officer- Tree RemovalApplicalion 12.24.090 (EX3)
(appealed to the City Council)
Appeal: $140.80
Planning Commission- Tree RemovalApplication 12.24.090 (EX4) (appealed to the City Council)
Appeal: $140.80
Page 27 of 45
SECI/ON 2. SUBJECT OF APPEAL:
The date the decision being appealed was rendered 5."14.24
Tree Removal address 2125 SIory Rd. SLO CA 93401 Application number:Tree-A2OA-2024
Explain specifically what action(s) you are appealing and why you believe your appeal should be
considered. You may attach additional pages, if necessary:
Dear Tree Committae Mombers,
District. The denial of our application tor tree removal has raised concerns about salety and accessibility for our students, staff, and the community.
Tho tollowing points outline our reasons for appealing lhis decision:
Elementary School.
about tha salety ol €veryone who uses the school entrance.
this issue mors etfectively.
Our proposed solution is as follows:
Tres Removal: We respectfully request ihe rsmoval of th€ two large and destructive Ash tre€s. Once removed, we can proceed with n€cessary repairs to the sidewalk.
Myrtlos at the Districts expense. Thess trees are known for their aeslhetic appeal and manageable size, ensuring a sal€r environmenl lor everyone.
Sidewalk Repairs: The District would commit to covering the €xpenses associated with repairing the sidewalk.
Our primary goal is to creat€ a safe and welcoming €nvironmenl for all students, staff, and visitors.
Thank you lor your attenlion to this matter. We appreciate your consideration and hop€ lor a favorable resolution.
Sincoraly
Chris Bonin
Director of Faciliti€s, Grounds and Transportation
5.22.24
Signature of Appellant Date
Page 28 of 45
Chapter 12.24.'180
APPEALS
Section
12.24180 Appeals
A. Any person aggrieved by an act or determination of the authorized approving authority
exercising the authority herein granted shall have the right to appeal the decision of the
authorized approving authority as set forth in this section.
B. Appeals received by the city clerk within ten calendar days from the date of determination or
act shall cause the director to withhold tree removal permits and any permits for construction or
demolition activity relying on the subject tree removal until the appeal is heard and a decision is
reached.
Removal Application Type Decision Maker Appeal Body
lmminent Hazard to Life or Property
Section 1 2.24.090 (EX1 Xa)City Arborist No Appeal
Tree Health and Hazard Mitigation
12.24.090 City Arborist Tree Committee
Minor Ministerial Development Permit
(removal for a residential or accessory
construction on an R-1 or R-2 lot)
Section 1 2.24.090 (FX1 )
City Arborist
Community
Development
Director
Ministerial Development Permits
Section 1 2.24.090 (FX2)
Community
Development
Director
City Council
Discretionary Permits (Director Action/
Director Hearing/ Minor and Moderate
Development Review/ Minor Use Permit/
Minor Subdivision)
Section 1 2.24.090(FX3)
Community
Development
Director or
Hearing Officer
Planning
Commission
Major Development Review/Tentative Tract
Map/Conditional Use Permit
Section 1 2.24.090(FX4)
Planning
Commission City Council
The San Luis Obispo Municipal Gode is current through Ordinance 1662 and
fegislation passed through May 7, 2019.
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's Office for ordinances passed
subsequent to the ordinance cited above.
City Website: www.slocity.orq
City Telephone: (805) 781-7100
Code Publishinq Companv
Page 29 of 45
Page 30 of 45
TREE COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: REVIEW A TREE REMOVAL CONVENIENCE APPLICATION TO REMOVE
ONE (1) LONDON PLANE TREE (PLANTANUS X ACERFOLIA) (HISPANICA)
LOCATED AT 4275 POINSETTIA STREET
FILE NUMBER: TREE-1312-2024 PROJECT ADDRESS: 4275 Poinsettia St.
FROM: Walter Gault, Urban Forestry
Program Coordinator / City Arborist
Phone Number: (805) 781-7578
Email: wgault@slocity.org
AP PLICANT: Luanne Cheda
RECOMMENDATION
Review the Tree Removal Application, removal based on convenience, and the
landscaping/compensatory replanting plan and provide a recommendation to the
Community Development Director for final action.
1.0 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION
Luanne Cheda (Applicant) has requested the
removal of one (1) Platanus x acerifolia (Platanus
x hispanica) (London Plane) in the front yard at
4275 Poinsettia Street using the Convenience
Tree Removal Application. The applicant would
like to remove the lawn and tree and replace with
more trees and drought tolerant landscaping.
2.0 COMMITTEE PURVIEW
The Tree Committee’s role is to review the
removal request in accordance with the process
set forth in San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
(SLOMC) Section 12.24 (Tree Municipal Code
Section 12.24.090(E)(3). This code section
utilizes the process set forth in subsection F(2),
the relevant additional application requirements
in subsection (D)(2) and the criteria set forth in
subsection (G).
Meeting Date: 6/24/2024
Item Number: 5a
Time Estimate: 20 Minutes
Figure 1: location of tree
Page 31 of 45
Item 5a
TREE-1312-2024 (4275 Poinsettia St.)
Tree Committee Report – June 24, 2024
3.0 TREE REGULATIONS
The City’s Tree Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 12.24) was adopted in 2010 and
recently updated in 2019 with the purpose of establishing a comprehensive program for
installing, maintaining, and preserving trees within the City. This ordinance establishes
policies, regulations, and specifications necessary to govern installation, maintenance,
removal, and preservation of trees to beautify the city; to purify the air; to provide shade
and wind protection; to add environmental and economic value; and to preserve trees
with historic or unusual value.
Criteria for Convenience Tree Removal Applications.
SLOMC §12.24.090 subsection (E)(3) requires review by the Tree Committee using the
criteria set for in SLOMC §12.24.090(G). Applicable criteria are provided below.
(G)(1). Size of Tree. The scale of the tree shall be considered, as well as the size
of the tree’s canopy. Larger, more visually prominent trees may have a higher
preservation priority than smaller, less visually prominent trees . Tree is visually
prominent, but not a particularly large specimen.
(G)(2). Location of Tree on Private Property. The location of the tree on private
property shall be considered. Trees located in a private rear yard, which are not
highly visible from the public right-of-way, may have a lower preservation priority
than trees with a high visual impact to the neighborhood . Tree is located in the
front yard and is highly visible from the public right-of-way.
(G)(3). Species of Tree. Native trees shall have a higher preservation priority than
non-native trees. Species is non-native and has a lower preservation priority.
(G)(4). Forestry Best Practice. The number of healthy trees that a given parcel of
land will support shall be considered, and whether removal would enhance the
health or survival of remaining trees. Applications that increase biodiversity of
native trees and tree age distribution within a given area are preferred . Parcel
could support more species and better landscaping if tree were removed.
(G)(5). Public Right-of-Way Obstruction or Displacement. Street trees requested
for removal due to obstruction of vision, access, mobility of public traffic or sidewalk
infrastructure repair or replacement shall have a lower preservation priority when
the tree species is known to have invasive root structure or other characteristics
that increase the likelihood that damage is likely to reoccur if not authorized for
removal. Trees adjacent to sidewalks with a high volume of pedestrian use with
large vertical or slope displacements may have a lower preservation priority.
Platanus trees are known to have invasive root structures particularly when are
planted in lawns due to the method of irrigation.
Page 32 of 45
Item 5a
TREE-1312-2024 (4275 Poinsettia St.)
Tree Committee Report – June 24, 2024
(G)(6). Compliance with Subsection J of This Section Regarding Compensatory
Plantings. The approving authority may consider an application proposal to provide
compensatory plantings in excess of required minimums in evaluating this
criterion. A compensatory replanting plan in excess of required minimums has
been provided.
(G)(7). Heritage Trees. A tree which has been designated a heritage tree is
prohibited from removal unless the city arborist authorizes a tree removal upon
finding that a tree removal would be related to tree health or hazard mitigation as
outlined in subsection (E)(1) of this section. Heritage trees have the highest
preservation priority. The tree request for removal is not a heritage tree.
4.0 ACTIONS
4.1 Recommend findings of consistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending approval of the application based on consistency with the Tree
Regulations (SLOMC Section 12.24). An approval of the application should
include a compensatory replanting plan with size and species of tree.
4.2 Recommend findings of inconsistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending denial of the application should include findings that cite the
basis for denial and should reference inconsistency with the General Plan, Tree
Regulations, or other policy documents.
4.3 Recommend continuation.
5.0 ATTACHMENTS
A - Tree Removal Application for 4275 Poinsettia (TREE-1312-2024)
Page 33 of 45
Page 34 of 45
Community Development
91 I Paln Stre0t, San Luis obispo, CA 93401 -321 8
805.781.7170
$iooily orrj
TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION
For all Non-Construction and Construction related tree removals
owner Name: Lt,.ann.- cir.-J.--Applicant Name: Lt -*^ r\ e-, c-ttz,Jc*-
Address: 'tazt Poit, d e h*r.r- 6+Address: .{*_ _
citv:
.5" L c)ziP?rs yo r City:zip:
Phone tcs / +qY- ?Gv I Phone:
Email l^o-no|-/rT2eqvnol t ' con'1'Email
Address of Tree(s)S- Po ,'r'6"-*+) ."-J+ 15 c c'r
Number of trees applying to remove: O
Tree Species a. -l-.. r,, .^s X a-c <- ri { o r i <-
Reason for Removal: L"^^,, an&- *.c.- lo h<- re-nn e tzctL anuL .rzp io.c-..(* c."->i)'/-
s --/f ro t/<-E/<- L.7 /+A A . /?up iuc e-
ai s7s le,
^ f ,^o fi"n;17 *a sicle-c*t-lk-
h e-t^t' lztnr(,\ c:qi-t t-. -
d f.r-5 1,. t -fo (e6rr.n.f S pe-c-l e,s C-
':::f'^.t'"./c^^e'> d+c +a )nuztsi te-, f o
2. -r e,.ve---) i n .te,o,.i,f*,oP
ls this a City Tree?DON'T KNOW Dog in yard?YES o
ls this associated with a Building Permit or Development Plan?
lf YES, please provide appropriate reference numbers:
YES NO
ls this property governed by a Homeowners Association (HOA)dX] YES NO lf YES, please provide
HOA Board Approved Meeting minutes authorizing tree removal(s) with your tree removalapplication
ALL ITEMS BELOW MUST BE INCLUDED TO PROCESS TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONSgKg
Tree(s) banded with ribbon or duct tape for identification
Site plan drawing or photo of tree site with Tree lD (Tree#1, Tree #2, etc.)
Supporting OocumefiilTiofr'(repair, receipts, etc.) te.-l*er +o q )'17 '?o<>*
,
Photo log showing damage or reasons for removall rc,-,f s / lVLr^t d rau(
Replantingplanz- - /
Arborist Report3
F f "1.--^lLanc'(s<-'-P<-
'Er
Fu
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
FAILURE TO KEEP TREES BANDED MAY RESULT IN A REJECTED APPLIGATION.
6 1. lnclude a photo log that clearly shows the trees requested for removal. All tree(s) must be
uniquely identified by a number and a ribbon, or an identifier wrapped around the truck in the
photo and prior to inspection.
2. lnclude a replanting plan in accordance with Section 12.24.090U) of the City's Municipal
Code. A minimum 1:1 replanting rate is required for plantings onsite, and a minimum 2:1
replanting rate is required for plantings offsite or within the public right-of-way.
3. An application for tree removal on a site where a discretionary or ministerial development
permit is requested shall include an arborist report and a site plan that includes accurate drip
line delineation and cross sections of construction work impacting both trees proposed for
removal and trees planned to remain.
q.
Page 35 of 45
SELECT TYPE OF TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION BEING SUBMITTED DECISION MAKER
lmminent Hazard to Life or Property
SLOMC 12.24.090(EX1 Xa)City Arborist
K
ree Health and Hazard Mitigation
LOMC 12.24.090(El
lFe
Commiftee makes recommendation to
v
a-\
v
LOMC 12.24.x3)
Removal Community
Development Director
City Arborist
Minor Ministerial Development Permit
sLoMc 12.24.0e0(F)(11
Removal for residential or accessory construction on an R-l or R-2 lot
City Arborist
Discretionary Permits Gonstruction Tree Removal
sloMc 12.24.090(Ft(€)
Community
Development Director
Major Development / Tentative Tract Map/ Gonditional Use Permit
sloMc 12.24.A90F\9',)Planning Commission
Tree Removal Decisions as outlined in Section 12.24.090 of the Gity's Municipal Gode
Submittal lnstructions
Submit Tree Removal applications to the City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development Department at
the following address: 919 Palm Street. San Luis Obisoo. CA 93401 or by email to trees@slocity.orq.
Payment of the "Tree Removal Permit" fee shall be submitted along with this application. Refer to the City's
current Comprehensive Fee Schedule for the current fee.
Property Owner Authorization :
By signing this application, I certify that I have reviewed
this completed application and the attached material
and consent to its filing. I agree to allow the Community
Development Department to duplicate and distribute
submitted materials to interested persons as it
determines is necessary for the processing of the
ApplicanU Representative Certification:
By signing this application, I certify that the information
provided is accurate. I understand the City might not
approve what l'm applying for or might set conditions of
approval. I agree to allow the Community Development
Department to duplicate and distribute submitted
materials to interested persons as it determines is
necessary for processing of the application.
.'t
Signed Date
applicalion.
,,*-z<z-u* 74, d,-/^- '/t/"n
Signed Date
Permission to Access Property:
This section is to be completed by the property owner
and/or occupant who controls access to the property. To
adequately evaluate the submitted proposal,
Community Development Department Staff,
Commissioners and City Council Members will have to
gain access to the exterior of the real property in order
to adequately review and report on the proposed
request. Your signature below certifies that you agree to
give the City permission to access the project site from
8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, as part of the
normal review of this application.\--4f/ztr",*'44. U.,1-- /t/u',
lndem nification Agreement:
The Owner/Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the City or its agents or officers and
employees from any claim, action or proceeding against
the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack,
set aside, void, or annul, in whole or in part, the City's
approval of this project. ln the event that the City fails to
promptly notify the Owner / Applicant of any such claim,
action or proceeding, or that the City fails to cooperate
fully in the defense of said claim, this condition shall
thereafter be of no further force or effect.
fu?.U-*L-- /*,/o,
Signed Date Signed DatePage 36 of 45
Architcctru'nl Conurrittcc AI'}PLICA'I'ION
Santa Lucia IIills llomcowrel's Associaliou (SLI{l'lOA)
3421 limprcsa Dlive Suite A, Snn l-uis Obispo
(805) s4t-6664 FAX (80s) s4r-2814
Appllcatlon for Approval of lmprovement or Change
This aopllcatlon ls rgqutfed per th.e $LHHOA CC&83
'I
r 11 rleName of Homeowner Maklng Appllcatlon:
Address of Property Belng lmproved/Changed:
EMAIL Address:c? (/,]
i^:; r:tt"i t't u- {Date: '.i ,:2 rflt/tz/
/ J , -&f f-t {'- '*} r'
.-I ' -.-i..] e.L;
((.
i/:rl,ic f"/ r'*. .{/Homeowner's Malllng Address rj -'t *
Daytlme Telephone:Moblle Teleph ri,-.:'ong: li rr )JU \t - 'rlr - -i x-r i u / q' t rr
I m p rove m e nt/Cha n ge B e i ng Su b m I tred lplegqfljhqqk_All-Ap ol lcable b oxes],
[RemodeUAddltlon[Repalntlngilcate/Fenclngfloth*'-
P_rqposed CqloE
Sldlng color: ._--_-*_.*_ Stucco color:
-*-=_
l'rlm color: -*--_-:'-- Garage door colon _.=-===-.-==..-,..-'._ Shlngle color: .-..*_._*____-
Fxlglngllqlors
Sldlngcolor:-Stuccocolorlrfrlnrcolor:-Garagecioorcolot'l-5hlnglecrrlorl-
flUndscaplng (Please attacli Plan showitrg; proposed plants (locatlnn, genus & specles, contalner slze), lrrlgatlon,
I 'hardscape eletnents (if rock/gravel proposed include type and color: use of rock/gravel ls allowed only as an
accent to overall landscape plan)
Briefly, describe below (or provide attachment) of the lmprovernent or change; as applicable, please submit drawings or
plans of the proJect wlth any other useful documentatlon. (NOTE: A City of San Luls oblspo bulldlng permlt may be
required. lt is the responsibility of the owner to obtain any such a permlt prior to work beginning. Changes must conform
to Clty codes,) Per Section 7,3 of the HOA's CC&Rs, the Architectural Comrnittee will not approve any lanciscaplng {at
maturity) or new constructlon request if it results in an unreasonable obstructlon of views from neighboring residences.
S'a c z.-i'-l{:. cl,u.,,,L*.
Owne/s Slgnature:7:.{ ':a
APPLICANT MUST CALL MANAGEMENT 21 DAYS AFTER SUBMISSION TO CHECK PROGRESS OF APPLICATION
Manager
Act by Date: .-.--:--:-----_
Documentssubmitted: fl plot Plan []] Elevationu [lColor/Marerial llothen_-_
Received: o-ilz '7 1
The followlng wlll be by the
Sent toARC: ?1
CONTINUED ON THE NEXT SID
Page 37 of 45
Architccturnl Colnlrr lttcc AIIITLICATION
Santa Lucia LI i I ls I lonreowlor.s Associat ion (SLFI I'IOA)
3421 Brnpresn Dlivc Suitc A, San Luis Obispo
(80s) s4l-6(t64 IrAX (805) s4l-2s14
(The followlng sectlon to be completed by the Archrtectural committee)
Date Commlttee determined appl
The Architectural Committee met
lcation submittal complete on:
. aL{and reached the following declslon
€rn"application lS approved as submitred.
i I The appllcation is NOT approved for the reason(s) noted below.
! The application is approved with the following condltlons, changes and/or modlflcations.r-l A City of San Luls Obispo building permlt may be required; it is the responslbility of the owner to obtaln such a
permit prior to work beginning. Changes must conform to Clty codes.
€€- u)t I
<*
For the
3 " t '("L7
agement Signa Date
(z<.-f"vL t,1 -rSS
Print Name
(To be signed by homeowner after Architectural committee Approval)
I agree to tlrese conditions as stated above (or attached). Further, upon completion of the project I shall notlfy
REG. I agree all work will be completed within one year of the appllcation approval clate. I also understand that
work must begin within six months of Cotnmittee approval, or a new appllcation will neecl to be subrnltted for
reconsideration,
Owner Slgnature Date
ra]
Print Name
coNTtNUED oN THE NEXr stDFgL
Page 38 of 45
DESIGN KEY
WATER FEAIURE
D(STING COURTYARD
EXISTING CONCREIE
CONCREIE PADS
SMALL TREES
PRIVACY HEDGE
HARDSCAPE NOTES
CONCREIE PADS: STANDARD GRAY
TOPCASIOl FINISH
DECOMPOSED GMNITE: TAN
flISTING CONCREIE WALK TO REMAIN
BRICK COLUIVNS IO REIVAIN DECOKlPOSED GRANIIE
C0L0R: TdN
PLANT SCHEDULE CHEDA PLANTING PLAN
SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COWONWE
ilatu@. MvtsNl/wts0M 4'B0X
SYMBOL BOTANICAL /COffiON WE
@NT OW
$ZE OTY
5N
t0[
@
o
@
@
@
@
@
@
&VE ANilIATA / FONA I AdAW
LOMAOMLONG TOLASRfr /MIRSH
CONCRETE PADS
OLHEUWEA MOMRA/INIEOtrIO&E ] ML
PTTNPOruMTENUFOI UMStWRWEN/SLERSEINIAWBH 54
UEMNGAFRWC&tffiY8q/CWRNW 1UL
2t
l5
9
B
fl
1t
REPLACE EXISIING FENCE
MATERIAI/FINISH TO
MATCH OLD FENCE
EXISTING CONCREIE WALK TO REMAIN
IRRIGATION NOTES
POINT SOURCE DRIP TO ALL NEW PLANT
N4ATERIAL
NEWVALVES TO BE INSTALLED
PLANTING NOTES
EXISTING SYCAMORE TREE TO BE
REMOVED
SEE SCHEDULE FOR PLANT DFTALS
@
@ FORTINI OHEDA REstDENCE PLANT|NG AND HARDscApE PLAN I Ul;U I e @roNmqsuE$LsB01
CHEDA RESIDENCE 1
Page 39 of 45
{:G4}
June I 5,2007
Gary Keavney
Streel Supervisor
City of San Luis Obispo
25 Prado Road
San Luis Obispo, CA. 93401
RE: Sidewalk Repair
I)ear Mr. Keavney,
It has been brought to my attention thal you are the person I need 10 contacl regarding the
sidewalk located in front of my residence-
Tlris area of sidewalk (see enclosed photo) has been raised due to the root growth of the
tree in nry front yard. I spoke with Ron Dormant regarding notching this root in half.
Ron suggested that possibly you or your staff could lrelp eliminate the potential problem
with this uneven sidewalk.
My home address is4275 Poinsettia Street, San Luis Obispo. The nearest cross streets
are Soutlr Broad Streel and Tank Farm Road.
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions or repairs thal the city cor.rld do to smooth oul
this uneven sidewalk.
lf you rvould like 1o contact me, my cell phone number is748-9678
Thank you in advance for you assistance regarding this matter.
Sincerely
cA)z-
+St-qcrYG
6l*--"-"
Luanne Cheda
Page 40 of 45
i
I
I
I
Page 41 of 45
',:l'r..- :-
Page 42 of 45
--f-
Page 43 of 45
- -:-J'-'-' '-'-'-
Page 44 of 45
l
.,: ,
-,., :.1.
.'J ' ':
Page 45 of 45