Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-9625 Setting Priorities for Filing Written Arguments Regarding City Measures & Impartial AnalysesRESOLUTION NO. 9625 (2004 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING CITY MEASURES AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE IMPARTIAL ANALYSES WHEREAS, a special municipal election is to be held in the City of San Luis Obispo on April 26, 2005, at which time there will be submitted to the voters the following measures: Shall Resolution No. 9590 (2004 Series), amending the General Plan Land Use Map by designating 48.7 acres as general retail, 8.1 acres Yes as office, 3.3 acres as medium -high density residential, 54.7 acres as open space, with the remainder 16.2 acres allocated to roads and an interchange in conjunction with the San Luis Obispo Marketplace development project, be No adopted? Shall Ordinance No. 1449 (2004 Series), amending the zoning regulations map and Yes approving a preliminary development plan for the retail project known as the San Luis Obispo Marketplace, be adopted? No Shall Ordinance No. 1452 (2004 Series), approving a Development Agreement and a Special Tax Reimbursement Agreement between Yes the City, the Dalidio family and San Luis Obispo Marketplace, LLC for the San Luis Obispo Marketplace project, be adopted? No NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. That the City Council authorizes any and all members of the City Council to file written arguments In Favor or Against the measures in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of California and to change the arguments until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the measures may be submitted to the City Clerk. 13Ig7 Resolution No. 9625 (2004 Series) Page 2 SECTION 2. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of each measure to the City Attorney who shall prepare impartial analyses of each of the measures showing the effect of the measures on the existing law and the operation of the measures. The impartial analyses shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments. Upon motion of Council Member Ewan, seconded by Mayor Romero, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ewan and Mulholland, Vice Mayor Schwartz and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Settle The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of November 2004. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Audrey Hooped City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: than P. Lowell City Attorney aLAL/'