Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PRR24189 Masoni Rating Sheets
Evaluation Rating Scale 0 = Not Addressed 1 = Very Poor 2 = Poor 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent EVALUATION CRITERIA 85SIXTY 360 ELEVATED AUGUSTINE BLUE LOTUS CREATIVE DRINKING DMA GREENRUBINO HAPI JPW MEDIUM GIANT MILES PARTNERSHIP MODEST NOBLE STUDIOS PIRENE2 SEROTONIN SPECTER HALL SQUADRON TRAFFIK UNITED COLLECTIVE WEUSTHEM ADMINISTRATIVEOverall experience of the agency. Recent team experience in successfully performing similar services. Background and experience of the specific individuals managing and assigned to this project. 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 Quality, clarity and responsiveness/completeness of the proposal. 4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 Demonstrates competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the TBID. 3 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 2 Budget approach & cost effectiveness.4 4 5 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 2 3 2 4 2 Quality of references related to similar work.3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 5 5 3 4 3 2 3 3 2 4 2 Administrative Subtotal / 25 18 20 23 21 21 16 19 17 19 22 19 18 21 16 14 16 16 13 20 12 SCOPE OF WORKCreativity of the proposed approach in completing the work. 4 4 4 5 4 2 4 5 3 5 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 2 Demonstrates ability for strategic thinking, planning and innovation. 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 2 Ability to execute all Marketing Service Elements.4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 Demonstrates familiarity with San Luis Obispo.3 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 4 5 3 3 5 2 4 2 3 2 4 1 Overall quality of the proposed work plan.4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 Scope of Work Subtotal / 25 19 20 23 22 20 14 19 22 19 23 18 17 21 14 16 16 15 14 20 9 Total Evaluation / 50 37 40 46 43 41 30 38 39 38 45 37 35 42 30 30 32 31 27 40 21 *Please include comments for each agency explaining slide deck. Evaluation Rating Scale 0 = Not Addressed 1 = Very Poor 2 = Poor 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent EVALUATION CRITERIA 85SIXTY 360 ELEVATED AUGUSTINE BLUE LOTUS CREATIVE DRINKING DMA GREENRUBINO HAPI JPW MEDIUM GIANT MILES PARTNERSHIP MODEST NOBLE STUDIOS PIRENE2 SEROTONIN SPECTER HALL SQUADRON TRAFFIK UNITED COLLECTIVE WEUSTHEM ADMINISTRATIVEOverall experience of the agency. Recent team experience in successfully performing similar services. Background and experience of the specific individuals managing and assigned to this project. 4 2 4 2 5 2 3 4 3 5 5 5 5 4 2 4 3 4 4 Quality, clarity and responsiveness/completeness of the proposal. 4 4 4 3 5 3 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 3 3 3 4 Demonstrates competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the TBID. 5 3 4 3 5 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 2 3 3 3 4 Budget approach & cost effectiveness.0 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 3 3 Quality of references related to similar work.4 3 4 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 Administrative Subtotal / 25 17 16 20 14 24 14 15 20 16 21 23 23 24 17 12 15 14 16 0 18 SCOPE OF WORKCreativity of the proposed approach in completing the work. 4 3 4 3 5 3 2 5 3 4 3 5 4 5 3 2 2 3 2 Demonstrates ability for strategic thinking, planning and innovation. 4 3 4 3 5 3 3 5 3 4 3 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 Ability to execute all Marketing Service Elements.4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 3 3 4 4 Demonstrates familiarity with San Luis Obispo.3 3 4 4 5 0 0 5 4 4 2 4 5 3 5 0 0 0 0 Overall quality of the proposed work plan.3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 2 3 3 Scope of Work Subtotal / 25 18 16 20 16 22 12 12 23 17 20 15 22 22 20 17 11 10 13 0 13 Total Evaluation / 50 35 32 40 30 46 26 27 43 33 41 38 45 46 37 29 26 24 29 0 31 *Please include comments for each agency explaining cannot open Evaluation Rating Scale 0 = Not Addressed 1 = Very Poor 2 = Poor 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent EVALUATION CRITERIA 85SIXTY 360 ELEVATED AUGUSTINE BLUE LOTUS CREATIVE DRINKING DMA GREENRUBINO HAPI JPW MEDIUM GIANT MILES PARTNERSHIP MODEST NOBLE STUDIOS PIRENE2 SEROTONIN SPECTER HALL SQUADRON TRAFFIK UNITED COLLECTIVE WEUSTHEM ADMINISTRATIVEOverall experience of the agency. Recent team experience in successfully performing similar services. Background and experience of the specific individuals managing and assigned to this project. 3 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 5 4 5 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 Quality, clarity and responsiveness/completeness of the proposal. 3 3 3 3 4 2 4 2 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Demonstrates competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the TBID. 3 3 3 3 5 2 4 3 3 3 5 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 Budget approach & cost effectiveness.4 4 4 5 2 1 4 5 2 4 4 4 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 Quality of references related to similar work.3 3 4 3 3 2 2 1 2 4 4 4 4 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 Administrative Subtotal / 25 16 17 18 18 18 9 17 15 14 17 22 20 19 10 11 8 9 8 11 8 SCOPE OF WORKCreativity of the proposed approach in completing the work. 3 4 3 5 3 2 3 3 2 3 4 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 Demonstrates ability for strategic thinking, planning and innovation. 3 4 4 4 4 2 5 3 2 3 5 4 4 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 Ability to execute all Marketing Service Elements.3 3 4 4 4 2 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 Demonstrates familiarity with San Luis Obispo.2 1 2 4 5 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 Overall quality of the proposed work plan.2 3 3 3 3 2 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 Scope of Work Subtotal / 25 13 15 16 20 19 10 18 14 12 16 21 19 20 10 13 10 8 11 9 9 Total Evaluation / 50 29 32 34 38 37 19 35 29 26 33 43 39 39 20 24 18 17 19 20 17 *Please include comments for each agency explaining me. Canada? Evaluation Rating Scale 0 = Not Addressed 1 = Very Poor 2 = Poor 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent EVALUATION CRITERIA 85SIXTY 360 ELEVATED AUGUSTINE BLUE LOTUS CREATIVE DRINKING DMA GREENRUBINO HAPI JPW MEDIUM GIANT MILES PARTNERSHIP MODEST NOBLE STUDIOS PIRENE2 SEROTONIN SPECTER HALL SQUADRON TRAFFIK UNITED COLLECTIVE WEUSTHEM ADMINISTRATIVEOverall experience of the agency. Recent team experience in successfully performing similar services. Background and experience of the specific individuals managing and assigned to this project. 3 4 5 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Quality, clarity and responsiveness/completeness of the proposal. 4 4 4 3 3 2 3 4 3 4 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Demonstrates competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the TBID. 3 4 4 3 2 2 3 4 3 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Budget approach & cost effectiveness.4 3 5 4 2 2 3 4 2 4 4 5 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 Quality of references related to similar work.3 3 4 3 3 2 2 5 3 4 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Administrative Subtotal / 25 17 18 22 15 12 10 14 21 15 21 24 25 23 10 9 9 9 9 9 15 SCOPE OF WORKCreativity of the proposed approach in completing the work. 3 3 4 3 2 2 2 4 2 3 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Demonstrates ability for strategic thinking, planning and innovation. 3 3 4 2 3 2 3 4 3 4 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Ability to execute all Marketing Service Elements.3 3 5 3 3 2 3 4 3 5 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Demonstrates familiarity with San Luis Obispo.2 2 4 2 2 2 2 4 3 4 5 4 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Overall quality of the proposed work plan.3 3 5 3 2 2 3 4 2 4 5 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Scope of Work Subtotal / 25 14 14 22 13 12 10 13 20 13 20 25 23 21 10 10 10 10 10 10 14 Total Evaluation / 50 31 32 44 28 24 20 27 41 28 41 49 48 44 20 19 19 19 19 19 29 *Please include comments for each agency explaining your scoring: Evaluation Rating Scale 0 = Not Addressed 1 = Very Poor 2 = Poor 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent EVALUATION CRITERIA 85SIXTY 360 ELEVATED AUGUSTINE BLUE LOTUS CREATIVE DRINKING DMA GREENRUBINO HAPI JPW MEDIUM GIANT MILES PARTNERSHIP MODEST NOBLE STUDIOS PIRENE2 SEROTONIN SPECTER HALL SQUADRON TRAFFIK UNITED COLLECTIVE WEUSTHEM ADMINISTRATIVEOverall experience of the agency. Recent team experience in successfully performing similar services. Background and experience of the specific individuals managing and assigned to this project. 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 3 4 5 3 2 4 3 Quality, clarity and responsiveness/completeness of the proposal. 4 3 4 4 4 2 4 5 3 5 4 3 4 2 4 3 2 2 5 4 Demonstrates competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the TBID. 4 3 5 4 4 2 4 5 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 Budget approach & cost effectiveness.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Quality of references related to similar work.4 4 5 4 3 2 3 5 3 4 3 3 5 3 4 3 2 2 4 3 Administrative Subtotal / 25 19 17 21 19 19 12 18 20 16 21 16 15 21 14 19 17 13 12 20 16 SCOPE OF WORKCreativity of the proposed approach in completing the work. 4 3 4 5 4 2 3 5 3 4 3 3 4 3 5 3 2 2 5 3 Demonstrates ability for strategic thinking, planning and innovation. 4 4 5 5 5 2 3 5 3 4 3 3 4 3 5 3 2 2 5 3 Ability to execute all Marketing Service Elements.4 4 5 4 5 2 3 4 3 5 4 3 4 2 4 3 3 2 5 3 Demonstrates familiarity with San Luis Obispo.4 3 5 4 5 2 3 4 3 4 2 3 5 3 4 2 2 2 4 3 Overall quality of the proposed work plan.4 3 4 4 3 2 3 4 3 4 3 3 5 3 4 3 2 2 5 3 Scope of Work Subtotal / 25 20 17 23 22 22 10 15 22 15 21 15 15 22 14 22 14 11 10 24 15 Total Evaluation / 50 39 34 44 41 41 22 33 42 31 42 31 30 43 28 41 31 24 22 44 31 *Please include comments for each agency explaining experienc e. Evaluation Rating Scale 0 = Not Addressed 1 = Very Poor 2 = Poor 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent EVALUATION CRITERIA 85SIXTY 360 ELEVATED AUGUSTINE BLUE LOTUS CREATIVE DRINKING DMA GREENRUBINO HAPI JPW MEDIUM GIANT MILES PARTNERSHIP MODEST NOBLE STUDIOS PIRENE2 SEROTONIN SPECTER HALL SQUADRON TRAFFIK UNITED COLLECTIVE WEUSTHEM ADMINISTRATIVEOverall experience of the agency. Recent team experience in successfully performing similar services. Background and experience of the specific individuals managing and assigned to this project. 5 3 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 5 5 2 5 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 Quality, clarity and responsiveness/completeness of the proposal. 4 1 3 2 3 2 2 5 3 5 4 2 5 2 2 1 2 3 3 3 Demonstrates competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the TBID. 5 3 3 2 2 2 3 4 3 4 4 2 5 2 2 1 3 3 3 2 Budget approach & cost effectiveness.2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 4 2 5 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 Quality of references related to similar work.5 3 4 2 2 2 4 3 3 5 5 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Administrative Subtotal / 25 21 13 16 11 12 11 17 19 15 23 22 10 25 10 12 8 12 14 14 12 SCOPE OF WORKCreativity of the proposed approach in completing the work. 4 2 3 2 2 2 4 5 3 4 3 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Demonstrates ability for strategic thinking, planning and innovation. 4 2 2 2 3 2 3 5 2 4 3 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 Ability to execute all Marketing Service Elements.5 2 4 3 2 2 3 5 2 5 4 2 5 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Demonstrates familiarity with San Luis Obispo.4 3 2 2 2 1 2 5 3 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 Overall quality of the proposed work plan.3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 3 2 5 1 2 1 1 3 3 3 Scope of Work Subtotal / 25 20 11 14 11 11 9 15 22 13 19 15 10 23 9 10 9 10 12 13 14 Total Evaluation / 50 41 24 30 22 23 20 32 41 28 42 37 20 48 19 22 17 22 26 27 26 *Please include comments for each agency explaining too low Evaluation Rating Scale 0 = Not Addressed 1 = Very Poor 2 = Poor 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent EVALUATION CRITERIA 85SIXTY 360 ELEVATED AUGUSTINE BLUE LOTUS CREATIVE DRINKING DMA GREENRUBINO HAPI JPW MEDIUM GIANT MILES PARTNERSHIP MODEST NOBLE STUDIOS PIRENE2 SEROTONIN SPECTER HALL SQUADRON TRAFFIK UNITED COLLECTIVE WEUSTHEM ADMINISTRATIVEOverall experience of the agency. Recent team experience in successfully performing similar services. Background and experience of the specific individuals managing and assigned to this project. 4 4 5 3 3 2 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 Quality, clarity and responsiveness/completeness of the proposal. 5 4 5 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 Demonstrates competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the TBID. 4 5 4 3 3 1 2 3 3 4 4 3 5 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 Budget approach & cost effectiveness.3 3 2 3 4 3 3 1 5 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 Quality of references related to similar work.3 5 5 2 2 2 3 4 4 2 3 2 4 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 Administrative Subtotal / 25 19 21 21 14 15 10 13 15 18 15 18 15 21 10 9 14 14 14 19 14 SCOPE OF WORKCreativity of the proposed approach in completing the work. 4 5 5 4 3 2 2 4 3 3 4 2 4 2 2 2 2 3 4 3 Demonstrates ability for strategic thinking, planning and innovation. 4 4 4 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 4 2 5 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 Ability to execute all Marketing Service Elements.3 4 4 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 4 3 4 2 1 3 3 3 4 3 Demonstrates familiarity with San Luis Obispo.2 3 5 2 2 1 1 5 2 1 3 1 5 1 3 1 2 2 4 1 Overall quality of the proposed work plan.3 4 4 2 2 1 2 3 3 3 4 2 4 1 2 3 2 3 4 3 Scope of Work Subtotal / 25 16 20 22 14 13 7 11 17 14 13 19 10 22 8 10 12 12 14 20 13 Total Evaluation / 50 35 41 43 28 28 17 24 32 32 28 37 25 43 18 19 26 26 28 39 27 *Please include comments for each agency explaining your scoring: