Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRebuttal Argument Against Measure G-20RECtriVEN AUG 0 7 20?0 a Rebuttal Argument Against Measure G-20 *i.Q .Qi l-Y*f-l"f:RK IMPORTANT: READ THE "FINE PRINT" ANDVOTE NO! TRIPIES THE CIW'S SATES TAX INCREASE by making the existing tax permanent while adding a 1-% tax hike on top of it, forcing struggling families to pay more for clothes, supplies, and other necessities. FUNDS CAN BE USED FOR ANY GOVERNMENT PURPOSE WHATSOEVER. Revenuc fTOM thiS tAX goes into the city's General Fund and isn't required to be spent on what this measure proposes. CAN BE USED TO INCREASE SAIARIES. 11 city execs making more than the Governor and 25 others making more than US Senators can further increase their bloated salaries! GREATER DEBT. The city's unfunded public pension liability exceeds S1ZS million and climbing with interest accruing on its pension debt by Sf .f million monthly. "FOREVER TAX" ELIMINATES FUTURE VOTER APPROVAL. Now, voters get to decide every few years whether the sales tax is too high. This measure strips that safeguard. DEGRADES 'PROTECTION OF OPEN SPACE" AS MAJOR CITY GOAI. Despite its high priority among residents in community surveys, "Acquiring Open Space" is no longer on city's list of spending priorities. HURTS MTDDLE-CLASS, SMALL BUSINESSES, AND YOUNG FAMIIIES that are already suffering while encouraging locals to shop in other cities with lower retail sales taxes. a a a a a a -.--- -r /- slt/nz fuiifwxb 4 2t; Lo &*k .i( S The city's existing sales tax continues to 2023. Why push new taxes now? Let's give our economy a chance to recover and then give voters the opportunity to rescind or extend this regressive tax at that time. Please join us in voting "NO" on Measure G-20. a-t nfuh-,'" a/a/zo bee+Y Crso+ f"P*ivtr, o*rf',-o,o Fil/rz //?Uar Sonl l^,a? Ol>t'zPtnt r f o/.' €rptnd"( CrP,, r,,r.l rti€lttLflaF* tlr-v*n 1.rr."- A-+>1t*p- J7r*nr, e,[L yr>nIe- o AUG 0 7 2020 The undersigned proponent(s) or author(s) of the (circte one: prim ary t 6-uQ I argument (circte one: in favor or ft|@ ballot Measure G-20 at the Genera'iTdiii-cipal Election for the City of San Luis b5'ffi be held on November 3, 2O2O hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief. . '\ .ltl ARGUMENTS FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY AUTHORS OF P All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with Section 9200) of the Elections Code (EC) shall be accompanied by the foregoing form statement to be signed by each proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument. Attach this form to the signed and properly titled argument. See following page for additional notes. 'fl,r -\ l,cn,ente r Print Name fr K7-' l?vq- , submitted on behalf of: (Name of Orqaniz-ation ltYzA/a Al,,6nA tf Date ritrep4$ir L *ril Lvi* Obt-*,n, lf applicable, argument submitted on b6half of: (Name of Organization Print Name P:lrzal* atzg 59 Signature Date /oo = (Name of lf on of:argument Print Name Title Date erloul..-r-.t vv submitted on behalftf+ Print Tifle 'zo nature Date lf applicable, argument submitted on behalf (Name of Organization r Print Title Date 2oza 6a/ Tfll Fpro^or C-q-rrn-,t iA4 u*(tef