The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-21-2024 ATC Agenda Packet Active Transportation Committee AGENDA Thursday, November 21, 2024, 6:00 p.m. Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo The Active Transportation Committee holds in-person meetings. Zoom participation will not be supported. Attendees of City Council or Advisory Body meetings are eligible to receive one hour of complimentary parking; restrictions apply, visit Parking for Public Meetings for more details. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: Public Comment prior to the meeting (must be received 3 hours in advance of the meeting): Mail - Delivered by the U.S. Postal Service. Address letters to the City Clerk's Office at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, 93401. Email - Submit Public Comments via email to advisorybodies@slocity.org. In the body of your email, please include the date of the meeting and the item number (if applicable). Emails will not be read aloud during the meeting. Voicemail - Call (805) 781-7164 and leave a voicemail. Please state and spell your name, the agenda item number you are calling about, and leave your comment. Verbal comments must be limited to 3 minutes. Voicemails will not be played during the meeting. *All correspondence will be archived and distributed to members, however, submissions received after the deadline ma not be processed until the following day. Public Comment during the meeting: Meetings are held in-person. To provide public comment during the meeting, you must be present at the meeting location. Electronic Visual Aid Presentation. To conform with the City's Network Access and Use Policy, Chapter 1.3.8 of the Council Policies & Procedures Manual, members of the public who desire to utilize electronic visual aids to supplement their oral presentation must provide display-ready material to the City Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Contact the City Clerk's Office at cityclerk@slocity.org or (805) 781-7114. Pages 1.CALL TO ORDER Chair Garrett Otto will call the Regular Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee to order. 2.PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address. Comments are limited to three minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred to staff and, if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting. 3.CONSENT Matters appearing on the Consent Calendar are expected to be non- controversial and will be acted upon at one time. A member of the public may request the Active Transportation Committee pull an item for discussion. The public may comment on any and all items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute time limit. 3.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - 06-27-24 and 10-17-24 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES 5 Recommendation: To approve the Active Transportation Committee Minutes of 06-27-24 and 10-17-24. 4.BUSINESS ITEMS 4.a 2025 PAVING PROJECT 11 Review current design proposals for the 2025 Paving Project and provide input to staff on the transportation elements to guide further development of the project. 4.b COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FY 2025-27 CITY BUDGET GOALS 43 Recommend a prioritized list of budget goals for the upcoming FY 2025- 27 Financial Plan based on the Active Transportation Plan goals and priority projects. 5.COMMENT AND DISCUSSION 5.a COMMITTEE MEMBER UPDATES Receive a brief update from Active Transportation Committee members. 5.b STAFF UPDATES Receive a brief update on Projects from Active Transportation Manager Adam Fukushima. 5.c FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Active Transportation Manager Adam Fukushima will provide a forecast of items coming before the Active Transportation Committee. 6.ADJOURNMENT A Special Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee meeting is scheduled for December 12, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. The next Regular Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee meeting is scheduled for January 16, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. LISTENING ASSISTIVE DEVICES are available -- see the Clerk The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 781-7114 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410. Agenda related writings or documents provided to the Active Transportation Committee are available for public inspection on the City’s website: https://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-and- minutes. Meeting recordings may be found on the City’s website: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=60965 1 Active Transportation Committee Minutes October 17, 2024, 6:00 p.m. Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Committee Members Present: Member Dave Amos, Member Lea Brooks, Member Jill Caggiano, Member Russell Mills, Vice Chair Kimmie Nguyen, Chair Garrett Otto ATC Members Absent: Member Francine Levin City Staff Present: Active Transportation Manager Adam Fukushima, Recording Secretary Lareina Gamboa _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER A Special Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Committee was called to order on October 17, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, by Chair Otto. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Public Comment: None. --End of Public Comment-- 3. PRESENTATIONS 3.a 2023 Bicycle Friendly Community Report Card Receive the 2023 Bicycle Friendly Community Report Card. Public Comment: Myron Amerine Helene Finger Rick Elison Kathryn Hicks --End of Public Comment— Motion by Member Amos Page 5 of 69 2 Second by Member Brooks Motion: Receive the 2023 Bicycle Friendly Community Report Card Ayes (6): Member Dave Amos, Member Lea Brooks, Member Jill Caggiano, Member Russell Mills, Vice Chair Kimmie Nguyen, Chair Garrett Otto Absent (1): Member Levin CARRIED (6 to 0) 3.b Active Transportation Plan 2023 Progress Report Card Receive the Active Transportation Plan 2023 Progress Report Card and updated data from the Household Community Survey conducted earlier this year. Public Comment: Myron Amerine Rick Elison --End of Public Comment— Motion by Member Mills Second by Vice Chair Nguyen Motion: Receive the Active Transportation Plan 2023 Progress Report Card Ayes (6): Member Dave Amos, Member Lea Brooks, Member Jill Caggiano, Member Russell Mills, Vice Chair Kimmie Nguyen, Chair Garrett Otto Absent (1): Member Levin CARRIED (6 to 0) 4. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION 4.a COMMITTEE MEMBER UPDATES Active Transportation Committee members provided a brief update. Page 6 of 69 3 4.b STAFF UPDATES Active Transportation Manager Adam Fukushima provided the following update.  Updates on Complete Streets Projects for Higuera, Broad, and Foothill 4.c FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Active Transportation Manager Adam Fukushima provided the following agenda forecast:  November 21, 2024: 2025 Paving Project and Budget Goals for FY 2025-27  December Special Meeting (TBA): Vision Zero Report  January 16, 2025: 600 Tank Farm Road 5. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:09 p.m. The next Regular Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee is scheduled for November 21, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. _________________________ APPROVED BY ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2024 Page 7 of 69 Page 8 of 69 Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of June 27, 2024 Page 1 Minutes - DRAFT ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Thursday, June 27, 2024 1 Special Meeting of the Active Transportation Committee 2 3 CALL TO ORDER 4 5 A Special Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Active Transportation Committee was called to order 6 on Thursday, June 27, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room located at 990 Palm Street, 7 San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Otto. 8 9 ROLL CALL 10 11 Present: Committee Members Lea Brooks, Jill Caggiano, Russell Mills, Kimmie Nguyen 12 (vice chair), and Garrett Otto (chair) 13 14 Absent: Dave Amos, Francine Levin 15 16 Staff: Dana Ebe, Adam Fukushima, and Luke Schwartz 17 18 PUBLIC COMMENT ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 19 None. 20 21 --End of Public Comment-- 22 23 ACTION ITEMS 24 25 1. Foothill Complete Streets Project - Request for Preliminary Design Input 26 Staff provided a presentation and responded to Committee inquiries. 27 28 ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER MILLS, SECONDED BY 29 COMMITTEE MEMBER BROOKS, CARRIED 5-0, to move forward on the complete street 30 project for the Foothill corridor and that staff consider committee comments to help further the 31 project development. 32 33 Public Comment 34 Anne Hodges 35 Myron Amerine 36 Alan Martin 37 Kathy Godfrey 38 Steve Klisch 39 40 --End of Public Comment-- 41 42 43 Page 9 of 69 Minutes – Active Transportation Committee Meeting of June 27, 2024 Page 2 44 ADJOURNMENT 45 46 The meeting was adjourned at 8:18 p.m. The next Regular Active Transportation Committee 47 meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 18, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Hearing Room, 48 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. 49 50 51 52 APPROVED BY THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2024 53 54 55 Page 10 of 69 City of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission Active Transportation Committee AGENDA REPORT ITEM 4A DATE: November 21, 2024 FROM: Adam Fukushima, Active Transportation Manager PREPARED BY: Adam Fukushima, Active Transportation Manager Luke Schwartz, Transportation Manager Hai Nguyen, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: 2025 Paving Project Recommendations: Review current design proposals for the 2025 Paving Project and provide input to staff on the transportation elements to guide further development of the project. Discussion As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, specific streets are scheduled for maintenance work each summer, typically alternating each year between local neighborhood streets and arterial/collector streets. These projects provide excellent opportunities to incorporate planned safety and complete street improvements as part of these larger maintenance activities, which allows for more efficient and cost-effective implementation of priority active transportation and safety improvements. During summer 2025, the following locations are planned for repaving work:  Tank Farm Road (Broad Street to Orcutt Road)  Orcutt Road (Tank Farm Road to City/County Line)  Sacramento Drive (Industrial Road to Via Esteban)  Calle Joaquin (Motel 6 to City/County Line) See Attachment 1:Project Area Map for reference. Draft Design Concepts showing additional details are also provided for reference as Attachment 2. Project Goals and Objectives The following primary goals and objectives will guide the project designs, along with input from the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) and other community stakeholders. Overarching Project Goal: Implement pavement maintenance treatments at selected public streets, while leveraging opportunities to advance high-priority active transportation, accessibility and safety features. Page 11 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 2 Specific Design Objectives: 1. Repair and reconstruct damaged pavement surfaces on selected streets to provide a smooth road surface for driving, bicycling, riding transit, and walking across the street. 2. Implement the highest-priority (Tier 1) Active Transportation Plan (ATP) projects as part of roadway sealing improvements, and advance lower-priority (Tier 2 and Tier 3) ATP projects as resources allow. 3. Implement measures to reduce illegal speeding and other safety elements as identified in the City’s Traffic Safety/Vision Zero Program as part of paving project, where resources allow. 4. Retain on-street parking supply, unless where warranted for safety purposes. 5. Minimize inconveniences to residents and businesses during construction. Proposed Active Transportation Design Elements The following sections identify the preliminary scope of complete street and safety improvements proposed as part of the 2025 Paving Project, as guided by the ATP and the Traffic Safety/Vision Zero Program. Final designs will be refined based on input provided by the ATC, San Luis Obispo Fire Department, neighborhood residents, and other community stakeholders. All Streets in 2025 Paving Project The following complete street/safety features are proposed for all streets within the 2025 Paving Project limits: 1. Pavement Rehabilitation: Repair potholes, refresh striping, and reconstruct roadway pavement to restore a smooth surface for driving, using transit, bicycling, and walking. 2. Curb Ramp Upgrades: Upgrade select curb ramps to current ADA standards 3. Pedestrian Crossing Treatments: Install high-visibility crosswalks at all existing and proposed new marked pedestrian crosswalks. 4. Intersection Daylighting: Remove obstructions to lines-of-sight at all marked and unmarked crosswalks to increase pedestrian visibility and safety at intersection corners and midblock crossings. This is generally accomplished through vegetation trimming and installing red curb paint and/or signage to prohibit parking at intersection corners adjacent to crosswalks. California Assembly Bill 413 restricts parking within 20 feet of any marked or unmarked crosswalk, with enforcement permitted starting in 2025 regardless of whether signs or curb markings are present. The City will be proactively implementing curb markings and signed parking restrictions where appropriate as part of annual paving projects. These measures primarily apply to Sacramento Drive and side-street intersection approaches on Tank Farm Road. Tank Farm Road Complete street improvements are proposed for Tank Farm Road to improve active transportation facilities and safety for all road users. Tank Farm Road is identified as a Tier 1 (highest priority) corridor in the City’s ATP, with recommendations to add protected bike lanes and pedestrian crossing improvements. Further, City staff receives regular comments/complaints from community members regarding the following concerns on Tank Farm Road: Page 12 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 3 1. General complaints about high vehicle speeds and illegal speeding on Tank Farm Road, including requests to lower posted speed limits. 2. Complaints about difficulty making left turns onto Tank Farm Road from side street intersections due to high vehicle speeds on Tank Farm. 3. Concerns about vehicles failing to yield to pedestrians at existing marked crosswalks on Tank Farm at Poinsettia and at the Righetti Ranch Road roundabout. 4. Requests for addition of an enhanced pedestrian crossing on Tank Farm between Poinsettia and Righetti Ranch Road. The most prominent modification proposed for Tank Farm Road as part of the 2025 Paving project is a five-lane to three-lane road diet between Poinsettia and Righetti Ranch Road. Road diets are one of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s proven safety countermeasures and have consistently demonstrated effectiveness in reducing illegal speeding, crash frequency and severity. According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), road diets typically reduce total collisions by 19%-47% on average. The City has implemented several successful road diets at other streets, such as South Street, Marsh Street, Laurel Lane, and Johnson Avenue (south of Bishop Street) where traffic demand did not require the excess lane capacity that was previously provided and have seen clear reductions in illegal speeding and collision trends. Tank Farm Road currently carries an average daily traffic volume of 11,000 veh/day west of Righetti Ranch Road, and 5,600 veh/day east of Righetti Ranch Road, which is well within the thresholds typically deemed appropriate for three-lane road diets per state and federal guidelines (up to 18,000-25,000 veh/day). Tank Farm Road – Proposed Road Diet Limits A traffic operations analysis study was prepared to assess the viability of a proposed road diet on Tank Farm Road. This study is near completion and will be provided as agenda correspondence prior to the ATC Meeting. The analysis evaluates traffic conditions—specifically motor vehicle congestion and delays—along the segment of Tank Farm Road where lane reductions are proposed (Poinsettia to Righetti Ranch Road), considering both existing and future (Year 2040) traffic conditions. The conclusions of the traffic analysis report are summarized as follows: Page 13 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 4  The existing (2024) and projected future (2040) traffic volumes on Tank Farm Road are well within the volume thresholds recommended for a five-lane to three-lane road diet.  Driver delays/congestion at intersections within the proposed road diet limits would remain below the City’s adopted level of service (LOS) thresholds for existing (2024) conditions with the proposed lane reductions. o The most notable change in driver experience would be an increase in delay of 2- 6 seconds per vehicle on average turning left from side streets to Tank Farm Road during AM and PM peak hours.  Under 2040 conditions, with buildout of the City’s General Plan land use forecasts, including remaining development within the Orcutt Specific Plan Area and additional growth outside of the city limits, all intersections within the road diet limits would operate at acceptable levels of delay/congestion, with the exception of the Tank Farm/Poinsettia intersection, where the northbound approach would operate at unacceptable level of service (LOS) E during the afternoon peak hour period. Average delays for drivers making this northbound left turn from Poinsettia to Tank Farm would increase from 35 seconds per vehicle to 45 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour for 2040 condition with proposed lane reductions. o The traffic study recommends monitoring conditions at this intersection and modifying striping to add a northbound left-turn acceleration lane when warranted prior to the 2040 horizon year. While this acceleration lane is not proposed as part of the 2025 Paving project, it is recommended as a future modification and illustrated for reference in Attachment 3. The intersection of Tank Farm/Morning Glory/Sunrose is an appropriate location to add a marked pedestrian crosswalk, if additional safety features are incorporated into the design (i.e. bulbouts, warning beacons, safety lighting, etc.). Table Comparing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes vs the Road Diet Threshold 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Tank Farm (Broad to Righetti Ranch) Tank Farm (Righetti Ranch to Orcutt) Tank Farm Road Peak Hour Volumes vs. Road Diet Threshold 2024 - AM Peak Hour Volume (Two-Way)2024 - PM Peak Hour Volume (Two-Way) 2040 - AM Peak Hour Volume (Two-Way)2040 - PM Peak Hour Volume (Two-Way) Re c o m m e n d e d R o a d D i e t Th r e s h o l d (1, 7 5 0 P e a k H o u r V o l ) Page 14 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 5 In addition to the proposed road diet, the following design elements are currently proposed for Tank Farm Road (see attached design drawings for additional detail): 1. ADA curb ramp upgrades. 2. Installation of radar speed feedback signs and additional speed limit signs (example photo below). Example of Radar Speed Feedback Sign 3. Upgrades to Tank Farm/Poinsettia pedestrian crossing:  Removal of the low-contrast decorative crosswalks, replace with high-visibility “ladder-style” crosswalk markings for added contrast.  Potential for curb extensions (bulbouts) at the west leg of the intersection to shorten pedestrian crossing distance/exposure  Installation of a new streetlight to better illuminate the pedestrian crosswalk on Tank Farm.  Relocating the existing Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) to new corner extensions to increase visibility. 4. Installation of an enhanced pedestrian crossing at Tank Farm/Morning Glory/Sunrose:  Potential for curb extensions (bulbouts) at the west leg of the intersection to shorten pedestrian crossing distance/exposure.  Addition of high-visibility “ladder-style” crosswalk markings.  Potential for curb extensions (bulbouts) at the west leg of the intersection to shorten pedestrian crossing distance/exposure.  Installation of push-button RRFB system (see example photo below). Page 15 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 6 Example of a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) 5. Addition of RRFB beacons at the Righetti Ranch Roundabout for crosswalks crossing Tank Farm Road, improving visibility for pedestrians crossing Tank Farm Road. 6. Striping modifications to the westbound Tank Farm Road approach at the Broad Street intersection to provide one left-turn lane, one through lane and one shared through/right turn lane. (reduces vehicle congestion/delays and eliminates need for westbound cyclists to merge across high-speed/volume traffic lane). 7. Addition of green bike lane conflict markings at intersections and high-traffic driveways. 8. Addition of striped bike lane buffers along the full segment between Broad Street and Orcutt Road, and installation of flexible bollards separating bicyclists from motor vehicle traffic where roadway width allows. Typical street cross sections for Tank Farm Road are provided below for reference. 1 1 For all cross sections in this report, dimensions are typical and may vary by street segment. Page 16 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 7 Existing Cross Section of Tank Farm Rd: Broad St to Poinsettia St Proposed Cross Section of Tank Farm Rd: Broad St to Poinsettia St Existing Cross Section of Tank Farm Rd: Poinsettia St to Righetti Ranch Rd Proposed Cross Section of Tank Farm Rd: Poinsettia St to Righetti Ranch Rd Page 17 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 8 Existing Cross Section of Tank Farm Rd: Righetti Ranch Rd to Orcutt Rd Proposed Cross Section of Tank Farm Rd: Righetti Ranch Rd to Orcutt Rd Orcutt Rd: Tank Farm Rd to City/County Line Proposed improvements for this segment of Orcutt Road include pavement rehabilitation and restriping only. Sacramento Drive (Industrial Way to Via Esteban) Sacramento Drive is designated as a commercial collector and serves both residential as well as light industrial uses, including a high level of commercial delivery trucks. The City’s ATP calls for retaining the striped bike lanes on Sacramento, which exist currently, and a potential future intersection improvement in the form of an all-way stop at the Sacramento/Capitolio, which is identified as a Tier 3 (lower priority) improvement. Public comments/complaints received by City staff regarding Sacramento Drive in recent years primarily include the following: 1. Concerns with poor pavement condition, particularly within the northbound bike lane. 2. General complaints regarding high speeds and illegal speeding, including from larger commercial trucks that frequent Sacramento Drive. 3. Concerns with large, parked vehicles/trucks encroaching into southbound bike lane. 4. Concerns with high vehicle speeds and encroachment into the bike lane along the curve in the road north of the paving project limits (note that two community members traveling on foot were tragically killed by a reckless driver along this curve in November 2022) To address these concerns, primarily with illegal speeding on the corridor, the following design elements are proposed as part of the 2025 Paving project for Sacramento Drive: Page 18 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 9 1. Pavement reconstruction to repair potholes and cracking, providing a smooth road surface for all users. 2. While outside of the paving project limits, plans include sign/striping modifications along the roadway curve north of Via Esteban to reduce illegal speeds and vehicle encroachment into the bike lane. Measures include addition of striped bikeway buffers and plastic flex posts to separate vehicles from bicycles, centerline hardening (ceramic “bots dots” along yellow centerline), and additional curve warning signage. 3. ADA curb ramp upgrades. 4. Installation of radar speed feedback signs and additional speed limit signs. 5. Addition of green bike lane conflict markings at intersections and high-traffic driveways. 6. Striping refinement to narrow auto lane widths (within City Engineering Standards), add width to northbound bike lane, and add striped bike lane buffers, where width allows. 7. Moderate expansion of parking restrictions at intersection corners (“daylighting”) to improve sight distance and safety for all road users. 8. Pilot installation of traffic calming measures between Via Esteban and Industrial Way to reduce illegal speeding. Initial installation proposed using temporary bolt-down rubber speed cushions to allow for monitoring of effectiveness and potential impacts to commercial trucks and emergency response vehicles, with potential for further modifications and permanent materials at a future date. (Note that final traffic calming details require approval from the City Fire Department). During preliminary planning for Sacramento Drive repaving, staff evaluated the intersection of Sacramento/Capitolio to verify the feasibility of installing all-way stop control. However, based on review of traffic volumes, collision history, and site conditions, the intersection does not currently meet the thresholds or “warrants” that need to be satisfied per state engineering standards in order to legally install an all-way stop at this intersection. A future all-way stop is recommended for consideration in the City’s ATP; thus, staff will continue to monitor potential for this modification in the future. Typical cross sections for Sacramento Drive (looking north) are provided for reference below. 2 2 For all cross sections in this report, dimensions are typical and may vary by street segment. Page 19 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 10 Sacramento Dr – Existing Cross Section Sacramento Dr – Proposed Cross Section Calle Joaquin (Motel 6 to City/County Line) Along this stretch of Calle Joaquin southwest of the Motel 6, improvements include pavement rehabilitation and restriping, with the only notable change from existing conditions being the addition of striped edge lines for added visibility at night. Example of Increased Nighttime Visibility with Addition of Edge Lines Page 20 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 11 Public Outreach For this project, a project webpage was created, where members of the community can find out more info about the project as well as sign up for project specific updates. In addition, a press release was sent out and over 2,600 postcards were sent to residents in the areas near the proposed paving inviting input at the ATC meeting. Following the ATC meeting, members of the community can still provide input by reaching out to the contacts listed on the project webpage. Project Costs and Funding This project currently has a budget of approximately $9.2 million. This includes allocation of $200,000 from the Active Transportation Plan Implementation account for addition of ATP elements. Most of the funding is from the Street Reconstruction and Resurfacing Capital Improvement Project Account, which includes a mix of approximately $1.5 million in SB 1 (Gas Tax) funding and $7.5 million in general funds. The current preliminary total project cost estimate is approximately $9 million, which is within the total budget; however, detailed designs have not yet been completed and final cost estimates may vary. Next Steps Following review and input from the ATC and community, staff will refine final project designs. A project webpage has also been created for the public to gain further information, ask questions, and provide further input. The project is scheduled to go to the City Council in spring 2025 to approve final plans and authorize solicitation of construction bids. Construction of the project is planned to begin in late summer 2025. Recommendations: Review current design proposals for the 2025 Paving Project and provide input to staff on the transportation elements to guide further development of the project. Attachments: Attachment 1: Project Area Map Attachment 2: Draft Design Concepts Attachment 3: Potential Future Tank Farm/Poinsettia Left Turn Acceleration Lane Page 21 of 69 Page 22 of 69 Airport C alle Joaquin 2025 Paving Project Paving of roadways includingmaintenance and striping Safety and mobility improvements Traffic Calming Measures Project Location Roundabouts on Tank Farm Rd. notincluded since recently constructed(( R o c k v i e w P l . Orcutt Rd. O r c u t t R d . Hu c k l e b e r r y Ln. BuckeyeCt. P o i n s e t t i a S t . El Capita n W y . Fuller Rd . Fiero Ln. Airport Dr. Tank Far m R d . Industri a l W y . Tank Farm Rd. Wav e r t r e e S t . Br o o k e p i n e D r . Ricar d o Ct. Capitolio Wy. Via Esteb a n R o b e r t o C t . M i g u e l i t o C t . Willow C r . Tiburon W y . B u l l o c k L n . B r o a d S t . B r o a d S t . Sacra m ento D r. B o u g a i n v i l l e a St. H o l l y h u c k W y. Blueb ell W y . Spanish Oaks Dr. G o l d e n r od Ln. M o r n i n g Gl o r y W y . Snapdragon Wy. Poinsettia St . I r o nbank St. Su n fl o wer Wy. A e r o D r . L o s O s o s Valley Rd.Righetti R a n c h R d Page 23 of 69 Page 24 of 69 Reference Documents: City Standard Specifications - XXX 2025 Edition City Engineering Standards - XXX 2025 Edition index to plans sheet no.description san luis obispo county, california ROADWAY PAVING 2025 T1 VICINITY MAP, GENERAL NOTES D1-2 DETAILS C1-CURB RAMPS S1-2 CALLE JOAQUIN S3-5 SACRAMENTO S6-8 TANK FARM (BROAD TO RIGHETTI) APPROVED BY SPECIFICATION NO.DATE of SHEET Brian A. Nelson, City Engineer R.C.E. C79870 Approved Date 00DATE XXXXX T1FILE NO./LOCATION [MO DAY, YEAR] S T ATE OF C A L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSIONA L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE PLANS, SPECIAL PROVISIONS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT AND THE 2020 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS, 2015 EDITION (UNREVISED). 2.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR OR PERMITTEE TO CONTACT "UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF NORTHERN/CENTRAL CALIFORNIA" BY PHONE AT 8-1-1 FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR LOCATION OF POWER, TELEPHONE, OIL AND NATURAL GAS UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. CONTRACTOR OR PERMITTEE SHALL ALSO CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY FOR THE LOCATION OF CABLE T.V., WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POSSESS A CLASS "A" OR "C12" LICENSE AT THE TIME THE BIDS OPEN AND DURING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE CONTRACT. 4.THESE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ALL EXISTING FACILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED WORK SUCH AS EXISTING IRRIGATION HEADS AND LINES, SHRUBBERY AND VEGETATION, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE CARE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OR VEGETATION IN THE VICINITY OF THE WORK, AND MUST REPAIR ANY FACILITIES DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. 5.WHERE TRIMMING OF EXISTING VEGETATION IS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT MUST BE DONE IN A MANNER TO REMOVE THE MINIMUM POSSIBLE AMOUNT OF VEGETATION AND LEAVE THE REMAINING IN AN ATTRACTIVE CONDITION. CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH CITY ARBORIST PRIOR TO TRIMMING OF ANY VEGETATION. 6.THESE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ALL OVERHEAD LINES. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE CARE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO AVOID CONTACT WITH OR DAMAGE TO EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES. 7.ANY EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT BECOME DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETELY RESTORED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AND AGENCIES WITH SERVICES IN THE AREA PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION. 9.PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL FILE A CORNER RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SURVEYOR FOR EACH EXISTING MONUMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE DISTURBED. PROTECT BENCHMARKS AND PROPERTY CORNERS IN PLACE PER CITY STD SECTION 5-1.26. 10.PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED OR DISPLACED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO RESTORING MONUMENTS. MONUMENTS SHALL BE RESET BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR AND SHALL INCLUDE PREPARING AND FILING A 11.UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREIN, ALL STRIPING AND MARKINGS SHALL BE PER CALTRANS REVISED STANDARD PLANS 2015 - A20A, A20B, A20C, A20D, A24A, A24B, A24C, A24D, AND A24E. ANY STRIPING NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS SECTION 84. 12.GREEN BIKE LANE MARKINGS SHALL BE SEALMASTER SAFE RIDE OR CITY APPROVED EQUIVALENT PER SECTION 84-6.01. INSTALLATION ON AC AND/OR CONCRETE SURFACE SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 13.CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 10' WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14.THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING PLACED ON CONCRETE REQUIRES A PRIMER COAT PRIOR TO APPLICATION. 15.FLEX POST MUST BE PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC OR APPROVED EQUAL. FLEX POST SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT. 16.RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) AND RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN EQUIPMENT SUBMITTALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT 17.HYDRANT MARKERS MUST BE INSTALLED PER STD. 7920. DO NOT INSTALL IN BIKE LANES 18.DO NOT APPLY ROADWAY STRIPING OR PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON PCC UTILITY COLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. general notes: legend: FIRE HYDRANT HYDRANT MARKER DRIVEWAY SIGN POST RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) SYSTEM STORM DRAIN INLET STORM DRAIN PIPE GAS LINE TREE PROTECTION 1.PROTECT TREE BRANCHES, TRUNK, ROOTS AND FOLIAGE THROUGH PROPER TRIMMING AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES WHENEVER POSSIBLE PER CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 20. CONTRACTOR TO HIRE CERTIFIED ARBORIST FOR TREE TRIMMING TO ALLOW NECESSARY EQUIPMENT CLEARANCE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HRS IN ADVANCE OF THE WORK. 2.WHERE TREES CANNOT BE TRIMMED TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, THE FOLLOWING TECHNIQUES MAY BE UTILIZED TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: a.USE EQUIPMENT THAT IS SHORTER IN HEIGHT OR WIDTH TO AVOID CONTACT WITH TREES b.BACK EQUIPMENT UNDER LIMBS AND FOLIAGE TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT c.EMPLOY HAND TECHNIQUES TO AVOID USING EQUIPMENT UNDER VULNERABLE TREES d.UNDER COORDINATION WITH THE CITY ARBORIST, PUSH INTERFERING TREE LIMBS TEMPORARILY OUT OF THE WAY LAYOUT APPROVAL 1.ALL STRIPING LAYOUTS, PLACEMENT OF VERTICAL ROADWAY ELEMENTS (I.E. FLEX POSTS, MEDIANS, ETC.), PARKING STALL TEES AND CURB PAINTING LIMITS SHALL BE MARKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2.NEW SIGN POSTS MUST BE INSTALLED PER ENG. STD. 7210 & 7215. 3.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREIN, ALL LANE WIDTH DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRIPE TO FACE OF CURB (OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHERE NO CURB EXISTS AT OUTSIDE EDGE OF ROADWAY). S9-10 TANK FARM (RIGHETTI TO ORCUTT) S11-12 ORCUTT Base Bid Add. Alt. A N ADJUST TO FINISHED GRADE PER CITY STDs. STORM or SEWER MANHOLE (PER 6040) WATER VALVE (PER 6040) MONUMENT (PER 9020) TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNICATIONS (PER 9030) GAS COVER HMA SURFACE 6" DEPTH PER DETAIL Z, SHEET D2 HMA SURFACE 10" DEPTH PER DETAIL Y, SHEET D2 REPLACE SSMH FRAME AND COVER PER ENG. STD. 6610 INSTALL NEW CONE AND GRADE RINGS AS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. REPLACE REPLACE SSMH FRAME AND COVER PER ENG. STD. 6610. INSTALL NEW CONE AND GRADE RINGS AS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. Page 25 of 69 CASE 1 SOLID GREEN BIKE LANE CASE 2 DASHED GREEN BIKE LANE EXTENSION APPROACHING INTERSECTION RIGHT TURN CONFLICT AREAS CASE 3 DASHED GREEN BIKE LANE EXTENSION THROUGH INTERSECTIONS AND ACROSS DRIVEWAYS GREEN BIKE LANE MARKINGS SHALL BE SEALMASTER SAFE RIDE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SEE GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REFERENCE NOT TO SCALE BIKE BUFFERA NOT TO SCALE MODIFIED CITY STD 7360E NOT TO SCALE CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKERSC NOT TO SCALE MODIFIED R10-15 SIGND AUTO LANE BIKE LANE 45°' 15' WIDTH PER PLAN 6" WHITE STRIPE WHITE BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON AND BIKE ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD 6" WHITE STRIPE GREEN BIKE LANE PAVEMENT COATING 6" WHITE STRIPE GREEN BIKE LANE PAVEMENT COATING 6" WHITE STRIPE GREEN BIKE LANE PAVEMENT COATING 2" YELLOW BOTS DOTS, TYPE AY MARKER PER 2015 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A EXISTING DETAIL 22 5' HAI-L O N G Q . N G U Y E N No. C 84733 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L 001 XXXXX DATE BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. NTS DE T A I L S D 30" 30" NOT TO SCALE BIKE BUFFER WITH POSTSB AUTO LANE 45°' 15' WIDTH PER PLAN 6" WHITE STRIPE EXISTING DETAIL 27B BIKE LANE PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC, 36 WHITE WITH 2 LIGHT GREY WRAPS 15' NOT TO SCALE SPEED CUSHION DETAILF CENTER OF LAYOUT 3' 14' CL TRAVEL LANE CURB FACE TRAFFIC LANE PARKING/BIKE LANE CURB FACE SPEED CUSHION NOTES: 1.SPEED CUSHION DIMENSIONS: ·WIDTH - 6' ·LENGTH - 14' ·HEIGHT - 3" (0.25') 2.SPEED CUSHION SPECIFICATIONS: ·BOLT-DOWN RUBBER MODULAR SYSTEM, TRAFFICLOGIX OR APPROVED EQUAL ·100% RECYCLED SYNTHETIC AND NATURAL RUBBER COMPOSITE ·TENSILE STRENGTH - MINIMUM 500 PSI ·SHORE HARDNESS - MINIMUM 70A ·SPECIFIC GRAVITY - 1.1 ·MARKINGS - ALL BLACK RUBBER MODULES WITH WHITE RETROREFLECTIVE CHEVRON MARKINGS PER CA MUTCD TRAFFIC LANE PARKING/BIKE LANE 6' WHITE THERMOPLASTIC LETTERING 8' 50' TYP Page 26 of 69 WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLAN) (SEE NOTE 2) (E) CURB AND GUTTER OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT, TYP. (SEE NOTE 5) REMOVE 6" MIN. OF EXISTING MATERIAL (AC, BASE, DIRT) TO ACCOMPLISH 1.5% TO 3% CROSS SLOPE. REPLACE WITH 6" OF HMA (SEE NOTE 4) ℄ (E) AGGREGATE BASE VARIES FROM 7-1/2" TO 8" (SEE NOTE 2) NOTES: 1.SEE PAVEMENT EVALUATION REPORT FOR EXISTING PAVEMENT CORING INFORMATION. 2.PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES SHALL MATCH EXISTING EXCEPT THAT CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1.5% MINIMUM, 3% MAXIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3.DEPTH OF EXISTING HMA LAYER VARIES FROM 4 TO 6 INCHES. 4.PLACE 6 INCHES OF NEW HMA IN TWO LIFTS. THE INITIAL LIFT MUST BE 4 INCHES THICK (3/4" AGGREGATE) AND FINAL LIFT MUST BE 2 INCHES THICK (1/2" AGGREGATE). 5.CONTRACTOR TO PAVE UP TO GUTTER LIP OR EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.HMA AGGREGATE SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 39-3.01. 7.APPLY TACK COAT PER SECTION 39-1.09C, INCLUDING BETWEEN HMA LIFTS WIDTH VARIES (SEE PLAN) (SEE NOTE 2) (E) CURB AND GUTTER OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT, TYP. (SEE NOTE 5) REMOVE 12-1/2" MIN. OF EXISTING MATERIAL (AC, BASE, DIRT) TO ACCOMPLISH 1.5% TO 3% CROSS SLOPE. REPLACE WITH 12-1/2" OF HMA (SEE NOTE 4) ℄ (E) AGGREGATE BASE VARIES FROM 6" TO 8-1/2" (SEE NOTE 2) NOTES: 1.SEE PAVEMENT EVALUATION REPORT FOR EXISTING PAVEMENT CORING INFORMATION. 2.PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES SHALL MATCH EXISTING EXCEPT THAT CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1.5% MINIMUM, 3% MAXIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3.DEPTH OF EXISTING HMA LAYER VARIES FROM 10 TO 12 INCHES. 4.PLACE 12-1/2 INCHES OF NEW HMA IN FOUR LIFTS. THE INITIAL LIFT MUST BE 4 INCHES THICK (3/4" AGGREGATE) MAXIMUM AND FINAL LIFT BE 2-1/2 INCHES THICK (1/2" AGGREGATE). 5.CONTRACTOR TO PAVE UP TO GUTTER LIP OR EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.HMA AGGREGATE SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 39-3.01. 7.APPLY TACK COAT PER SECTION 39-1.09C, INCLUDING BETWEEN HMA LIFTS (E) NATIVE MATERIAL HAI-L O N G Q . N G U Y E N No. C 84733 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L 002 XXXXX DATE BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. NTS DE T A I L S D NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL X-SECTION - TANK FARM, ORCUTT, AND SACRAMENTOY NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL X-SECTION - CALLE JOAQUINZ Page 27 of 69 SE E MA T C H L I N E BE L O W 2. 5 ' 2. 5 ' 12 ' 12 ' 12 ' 12 ' DOUBLE 5'x5' R.C.B. DETAIL 39 1963 LF DETAIL 39 1856 LF DETAIL 22 1992 LF REPLACE (3) W1-8(L) SIGNS REPLACE W14-1 "DEAD END" SIGN. INSTALL R26(S)(CA) "NO STOPPING ANY TIME" SIGN ON SAME POST N SE E MA T C H L I N E AB O V E SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T S 0 2 3' 3' 12 ' 12 '(E) 6'x7' R.C.B. PROTECT IN PLACE HEADWALL DETAIL 39 1963 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1856 LF, Cont. REPLACE R26(S)(CA) SIGN ON EXISTING POST REPLACE R26(S)(CA) SIGN ON EXISTING POST REPLACE R26(S)(CA) SIGN ON EXISTING POST N DETAIL 22 1992 LF, Cont. HMA SURFACE 6" DEPTH PER DETAIL Z, SHEET D240200 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 XX01 2000615 2025 1" = 20' BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 REVISION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. LEGEND CA L L E J O A Q U I N S RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 Page 28 of 69 S E E M A T C H L I N E B E L O W SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T S 0 1 1 . 5 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' 1 . 5 ' 4' 4' 12 ' 12 ' DETAIL 39 1963 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1856 LF, Cont. REPLACE EXISTING ROAD EDGE DELINEATORS WITH NEW DELINEATORS (CLASS 1, TYPE E ) PER CALTRANS STD PLN A73C SPACED 50 O.C., Typ. REPLACE R26(S)(CA) SIGN ON EXISTING POST REPLACE R26(S)(CA) SIGN ON EXISTING POST N DETAIL 22 1992 LF, Cont. SE E MA T C H L I N E AB O V E 2 ' 2 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' DETAIL 39 1963 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1856 LF, Cont. REPLACE R26(S)(CA) SIGN ON EXISTING POST N DETAIL 22 1992 LF, Cont. HMA SURFACE 6" DEPTH PER DETAIL Z, SHEET D240200 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 XX02 2000615 2025 1" = 20' BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 REVISION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. LEGEND CA L L E J O A Q U I N S RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 Page 29 of 69 6' 1. 5 ' 10 . 5 ' 10 . 5 ' 1. 5 ' 6' 6 0 ' REPLACE W1-8(R) SIGN ON EXISTING PUNCH POST PER CITY STD 7210 REPLACE W1-8(R) SIGN ON EXISTING PUNCH POST PER CITY STD 7210 REPLACE W1-8(L) SIGN ON EXISTING PUNCH POST PER CITY STANDARD 7210 REMOVE EXISTING SIGNS AND INSTALL W1-1a(R)(25) SIGN ON EXISTING PUNCH POST PER CITY STANDARD 7210 INSTALL W1-8(R) SIGN ON (N) PUNCH POST PER CITY STANDARD 7210. REPLACE W1-8(L) SIGN ON EXISTING PUNCH POST PER CITY STANDARD 7210 INSTALL W1-8(L) SIGN ON (N) PUNCH POST PER CITY STANDARD 7210. INSTALL 24" X 24" W8-6 SIGN AND W16-9P SIGN ON EXISTING STREETLIGHT POLE WITH STRAP & SADDLE BRACKET. INSTALL 18" WIDE WHITE BICYCLE BUFFER WITH FLEX POSTS AT 15' SPACING ON EXISTING BICYCLE LANE PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1 320 LF INSTALL 18" WIDE WHITE BICYCLE BUFFER WITH FLEX POSTS AT 15' SPACING ON EXISTING BICYCLE LANE PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1 332 LF N 2" DIAMETER YELLOW RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS (BOTS' DOTS) AT 5' SPACING ON EXISTING CENTERLINE PER DETAIL C, SHEET D1 317 LF SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T S 0 4 6. 5 ' 5' 10 ' 10 ' "HUMP" LEGEND 25 SQFT. Typ. REMOVE (E) R3-7R SIGN, INSTALL MODIFIED R10-15 SIGN ON SAME POST (SEE DETAIL D, SHEET D1) REMOVE (E) R4-4 SIGN AND PUNCH POST CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 112 LF INSTALL STREET NAME SIGNS PER CITY STD 7250 ON TOP OF (E) STOP SIGN POST INSTALL W17-1 SIGN ON (N) PUNCH POST INSTALL W17-1 SIGN ON (N) PUNCH POST INSTALL RUBBER MODULAR SPEED CUSHION PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1 CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 100 LF CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 77 LF INSTALL R2-1(35) SIGN ON (E) STREET LIGHT POLE WITH STRAP & SADDLE BRACKET REPLACE CURB RAMP PER SHEET C REPLACE (E) SSMH COATING. REPLACE SSMH FRAME AND COVER PER ENG. STD. 6610 N DETAIL 22 328 LF DETAIL 39 248 LF DETAIL 39 346 LF BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ. BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ. BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 234 LF HMA SURFACE 10" DEPTH PER DETAIL Y, SHEET D240200 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 XX03 2000615 2025 1" = 20' BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 REVISION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. LEGEND SA C R A M E N T O S RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 Page 30 of 69 SE E MA T C H L I N E BE L O W SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T S 0 3 8. 5 ' 5' 1. 5 ' 10 ' 10 ' 5' PROTECT IN PLACE (E) 44"x72" ELLIPTICAL CMP AND INLET "HUMP" LEGEND 25 SQFT. Typ. CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 87 LF INSTALL RUBBER MODULAR SPEED CUSHION PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1 INSTALL W17-1 SIGN ON NEW 12' PUNCH POST INSTALL W17-1 SIGN ON NEW 12' PUNCH POST DETAIL 39 15 LF CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 100 LF CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 92 LF REMOVE (E) PARKING SIGNS AND 12' PUNCH POST, INSTALL (N) RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN (TRAFFICLOGIX EVOLUTION 12FM W/ SOLAR KIT) ON (N) 14' PUNCH POST. INSTALL (N) R26(CA) SIGN BELOW SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN ON SAME POST. CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 77 LF N BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 573 LF DETAIL 39 698 LF DETAIL 22 406 LF DETAIL 39 312 LF BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ. BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ. SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T S 0 5 SE E MA T C H L I N E AB O V E 5. 5 ' 10 ' 10 ' 1. 5 ' 5' 8. 5 ' PROTECT IN PLACE (E) 30" HDPE PROTECT IN PLACE (E) 24" HDPE PROTECT IN PLACE (E) 24" HDPE PROTECT IN PLACE (E) 17.7" HDPE "HUMP" LEGEND 25 SQFT. Typ. CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 92 LF CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 112 LF BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 364 LF INSTALL R2-1(35) SPEED LIMIT SIGN ON NEW 12' PUNCH POST INSTALL RUBBER MODULAR SPEED CUSHION PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1 INSTALL W17-1 SIGN ON NEW 12' PUNCH POST INSTALL W17-1 SIGN ON NEW 12' PUNCH POST INSTALL R2-1(35) SPEED LIMIT SIGN ON (E) STREET LIGHT POLE WITH STRAP & SADDLE BRACKET RED CURB 60 LF RED CURB 100 LF CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 100 LF REPLACE STREET NAME SIGNS PER CITY STD 7250 REPLACE CURB RAMP PER SHEET C N DETAIL 22 1504 LF DETAIL 39 662 LF DETAIL 39 368 LF BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ. BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ. HMA SURFACE 10" DEPTH PER DETAIL Y, SHEET D240200 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 XX04 2000615 2025 1" = 20' BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 REVISION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. LEGEND SA C R A M E N T O S RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 Page 31 of 69 S E E M A T C H L I N E A B O V E REPLACE CURB RAMP PER SHEET C REPLACE CROSS GUTTER PER SHEET C RED CURB 20 LF REPLACE CURB RAMP PER SHEET C CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 88 LF INSTALL R81(CA) AND R81B(CA) SIGNS ON NEW 12' PUNCH POST NARROW BIKE LANE TO AVOID VAULT EDGE BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 742 LF, Cont. BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 590 LF, Cont. N 12" WHITE 27.5 LF "STOP" LEGEND 22 SQFT, Typ. DETAIL 22 1504 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 587 LF BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ. BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ. SE E MA T C H L I N E BE L O W SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T S 0 4 6' 10 ' 10 ' 1. 5 ' 5' 8. 5 ' 8. 5 ' 5' 2' 10 ' 10 ' 2' 5' DETAIL 39 662 LF, Cont. INSTALL (N) RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN (TRAFFICLOGIX EVOLUTION 12FM W/ SOLAR KIT) ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 742 LF BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 109 LF DETAIL 22 1504 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 109 LF CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 40 LF CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL E, SHEET D1 40 LF BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL A, SHEET D1 590 LF 10'10'10'10' HMA SURFACE 10" DEPTH PER DETAIL Y, SHEET D240200 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 XX05 2000615 2025 1" = 20' BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 REVISION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. LEGEND SA C R A M E N T O S RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 Page 32 of 69 7' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' VAR 16' 10' 10' 5' 10' 1.5' 2' 5' 5.5' 5.5' 2' REFRESH CROSSWALKS AND EXTENSION LINES INSTALL W9-1 ON NEW PUNCH POST. INSTALL W4-2 ON NEW PUNCH POST. 270' MERGE TAPER 8' 6' 10.5' 15' 10.5' 8' 20'20' RELOCATE EX. RRFB TO NEW STREET LIGHT POLE EX. BUS STOP TO REMAIN EX. BUS STOP TO REMAIN 5.5' 10.5 10' 10' 6' 10' 2' 5' 20'20' 20'20' 10' 10' 10' 12' 10' 6' 5' 7' 10.5' 10.5' 7.5' 10.5' 5' 7' INSTALL FLEX POSTS AT 15' SPACING RELOCATE EX. RRFB 6' INSTALL EX. R1-1 AND NEW R10-15 ON NEW PUNCH POST.NEW BULBOUT NEW BULBOUT 11' MAX INSTALL NEW STREET LIGHT POLE 7201 2000615 NOVEMBER 2024 RJD RJD TLK TLK RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 1" = 20' TA N K F A R M NO R T H NO R T H SE E M A T C H L I N E B E L O W SE E M A T C H L I N E A B O V E SE E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 2 FOR REVIEW ONLY 65% DESIGN NOVEMBER 2024 S06 of XX RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 INSTALL WHITE FLEX POSTS WITHIN BIKE LANE BUFFERS SEPARATE BIKE LANE FROM VEHICLE TRAFFIC (TYP). GREEN DASHED BIKE LANES THROUGH INTERSECTION AND DRIVEWAY CONFLICT AREAS (TYP) MERGE FROM TWO TO ONE THROUGH LANE EACH DIRECTION EAST OF BROAD STREET INSTALL NEW STREETLIGHT Page 33 of 69 8' 6' 10.5' 15' 10.5' 8' 8' 6' 10.5' 15' 10.5' 6' 8' 8' 6' 10.5' 10.5' 4.5' 10.5' 6' 8' 8' 6' 10.5' 10.5' 4.5' 10.5' 3' 5' 6' INSTALL NEW RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN 6' INSTALL FLEX POSTS AT 15' SPACING INSTALL RRFB ON NEW STREET LIGHT POLE EX. BUS STOP TO REMAIN 8' 6' 10.5' 10.5' 4.5' 10.5' 3' 5' 6' 19'21.5 ' 20.5'19.5' 12'11.5' 14' 10.5' 15' 10.5' 6' 8' 5' 9' 10.5' 15' 6' 8' 6' 5' 3' 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 8' 4.5' 5' 9' 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 4.5' 6' 3' INSTALL R9-3 AND R9-3B(R) ON NEW PUNCH POST INSTALL W11-2 & W16-9P ON NEW PUNCH POST INSTALL NEW RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN 10.5' 6' 5' INSTALL R9-3 AND R9-3B(L) ON NEW PUNCH POST NEW BULBOUT NEW BULBOUT INSTALL RRFB 7202 2000615 OCTOBER 2024 RJD RJD TLK TLK RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 1" = 20' TA N K F A R M NORTH NORTH SE E M A T C H L I N E B E L O W SE E M A T C H L I N E A B O V E SE E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 3 S E E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 1 FOR REVIEW ONLY 65% DESIGN NOVEMBER 2024 RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 S07 of XX INSTALL NEW STREETLIGHT Page 34 of 69 3.5' 8' 6' 10.5' 15' 10.5' 6' 8' 6' 10' 19.5' 10' VAR 6' 21.5' 10' VAR 6' INSTALL W11-2 & W16-9P ON NEW PUNCH POST EX. RAIL CROSSING BRIDGE INSTALL R9-2 & R9-2bP(L) ON NEW PUNCH POST INSTALL R9-3 & R9-2bP(R) ON NEW PUNCH POST INSTALL R9-3 & R9-2bP(R) ON NEW PUNCH POST INSTALL R9-2 & R9-2bP(L) ON NEW PUNCH POST INSTALL R9-3 & R9-2bP(L) ON NEW PUNCH POST INSTALL R9-2 & R9-2bP(R) ON NEW PUNCH POST MAINTAIN 20' CLEAR WIDTH FOR FIRE VEHCILES 3.5' 6' 6.5' 10' 15' 11' 5.5' 21.5' 10' 6' 10' VAR 6' VAR INSTALL RRFB (TYP.)INSTALL RRFB (TYP.) 2.5' 2.5' 7203 2000615 OCTOBER 2024 RJD RJD TLK TLK RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 1" = 20' TA N K F A R M NOR T H NORTH S E E M A T C H L I N E B E L O W S E E M A T C H L I N E A B O V E SE E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 4 SE E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 2 FOR REVIEW ONLY 65% DESIGN NOVEMBER 2024 RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 S08 of XX Page 35 of 69 6.5' 11' 15.5' 10' 5.5' 7' 3' 10.5' 11' 10.5' 3' 7'7' 3' 10.5' 11' 10.5' 10' 19.5'19.5' INSTALL NEW RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN INSTALL NEW RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN 2.5' 7.5' 3' 10.5' 11' 10.5' 3' 7' 7' 3' 10.5' 11' 10.5' 3' 7' 7204 2000615 OCTOBER 2024 RJD RJD TLK TLK RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 1" = 20' TA N K F A R M NORTH NORTH SE E M A T C H L I N E B E L O W SE E M A T C H L I N E A B O V E SE E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 5 SE E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 3 FOR REVIEW ONLY 65% DESIGN NOVEMBER 2024 RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 S09 of XX Page 36 of 69 7' 3' 10.5' 11' 10.5' 3' 7.5' 17.5'18' 8.5' 12' 12' 12' 8' 8' 10.5' 11' 10.5' 10' 10' 7205 2000615 OCTOBER 2024 RJD RJD TLK TLK RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 1" = 20' TA N K F A R M NORTH SE E M A T C H L I N E O N S H E E T 4 FOR REVIEW ONLY 65% DESIGN NOVEMBER 2024 RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 S10 of XX Page 37 of 69 SE E MA T C H L I N E BE L O W 8. 5 ' 12 ' 12 ' 8'12 ' 5 ' 10 ' 10 ' 1 0 ' 5' 5 ' 1 0 . 5 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' 1 1 ' DETAIL 39 1838 LF DETAIL 39 1864 LF MAINTAIN 12' LANE THROUGH CURVE DETAIL 29 183 LF DETAIL 222 142 LF TYPE IV ARROW 15 SQFT, Typ. DETAIL 38 112 LF DETAIL 24 38 LF N BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ. BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ. PROTECT IN PLACE (E) CONCRETE 20'x5' ARCH CULVERT SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T 1 2 S E E M A T C H L I N E A B O V E 8 . 5 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' 8 . 5 ' DETAIL 22 1524 LF DETAIL 39 1838 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1864 LF, Cont. N HMA SURFACE 10" DEPTH PER DETAIL Y, SHEET D240200 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 XX11 2000615 2025 1" = 20' BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 REVISION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. LEGEND AD D . A L T . O R C U T T S RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 Page 38 of 69 SE E MA T C H L I N E SH E E T 1 1 SE E MA T C H L I N E BE L O W 9' 12 ' 12 ' 7' DETAIL 22 1524 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1838 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1864 LF, Cont. N SE E MA T C H L I N E AB O V E 8. 5 ' 12 ' 12 ' 8' MATCH EXISTING STRIPING DETAIL 22 1524 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1838 LF, Cont. DETAIL 39 1864 LF, Cont. N HMA SURFACE 10" DEPTH PER DETAIL Y, SHEET D240200 S T ATE OF CA L I F O R NIA R E GISTER E D P R O F ESSION A L E N G I N EER C I V I L B R I A N A . NEL S O N No. C 79870 XX12 2000615 2025 1" = 20' BN WBH KH HN RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 REVISION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. LEGEND AD D . A L T . O R C U T T S RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 Page 39 of 69 Page 40 of 69 7201 2000615 NOVEMBER 2024 RJD RJD TLK TLK RO A D W A Y S E A L I N G 2 0 2 4 PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION SCALE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. of SH E E T T I T L E : PR O J E C T T I T L E : DATE: CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 1" = 20' TA N K F A R M NO R T H FOR REVIEW ONLY 65% DESIGN NOVEMBER 2024 POINTSETTIA ST AND TANK FARM RD ALTERNATE CONFIGURATION EXHIBIT A: RO A D W A Y P A V I N G 2 0 2 5 SXX of XX PROVIDE ACCELERATION LANE FOR NORTHBOUND LEFT TURNS FROM POINSETTIA TO ALLOW 2-STAGE TURNS Page 41 of 69 Page 42 of 69 City of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission Active Transportation Committee AGENDA REPORT ITEM 4B DATE: November 21, 2024 FROM: Adam Fukushima, Active Transportation Manager SUBJECT: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FY 2025-27 CITY BUDGET GOALS Recommendation Recommend a prioritized list of budget goals for the upcoming FY 2025-27 Financial Plan based on the Active Transportation Plan goals and priority projects. Background Every two years the City Council adopts a Financial Plan (sometimes called a two -year budget). This Plan spells out how the City will spend money on programs and projects for the next two years. As part of this process, all advisory groups are invited to submit budget goals for Council consideration. Discussion Council goals, by their nature, usually tend to be broader in scope than the work programs developed by advisory bodies. The City Council is seeking advisory body input on:  What are the most important goals the City should pursue in the next two years?  Why is each goal important as a community priority?  How might the goal be accomplished (creative funding or implementation ideas)? Given the projected fiscal constraints for the next budget, the Finance Department is recommending that goals which are already in progress take a higher priority than brand new goals. In addition, the Finance Department has informed that there are no new sources of funding in this upcoming budget cycle and that challenges with labor and cost escalations (both internally and contractors) are expected to continue. Given existing staff resources as well as the number of complete street infrastructure projects that are still in progress (Higuera, Broad, Foothill), of which Higuera and Broad have grant obligations, staff recommends focusing budget priorities on completing projects already in progress and incorporating new ATP priority improvements into upcoming paving projects, as resources allow. To help guide the Committee in identifying the most important projects or programs to pursue, members should review the following: Page 43 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 2  Advisory Bodies 2025-27 Financial Plan Goal Setting Parameters (Attachment 1)  Active Transportation Committee Budget Goal Recommendations for FY 2023-25 (Attachment 2)  List of funded active transportation projects from the 2023-25 Financial Plan. (Attachment 3). Note that any costs identified beyond 2025 have not yet received funding approvals but are included for planning and forecasting purposes.  “Budget in Brief: 2023-25 Financial Plan” outlines the “Major City Goals” in the City’s current budget. (Attachment 4)  Active Transportation Plan Tier 1 projects with ATC prioritization (Attachment 5). The list contains the top projects the City will pursue for funding which have the highest likelihood to increase bicycling and walking in the City with a goal to complete the Tier 1 network by 2030. The list was prioritized by the ATC on September 16, 2021. Please note that the Pavement Management Plan, which staff has used to initiate many ATP Tier 1 improvements has changed the scheduled years of some pavement areas and roadways. Given the changes, staff intends to bring the ATP project prioritization list/schedule to the ATC for an update in early 2025.  Agenda and Staff Reports from the October 17, 2024 Special ATC Meeting, where the committee received reports on the 2023 Bicycle Friendly Community Report Card and an update on the Active Transportation Plan Performance Measures. Staff Recommended Budget Goals Given prior challenges the Committee has had in finding a consensus on budget goals, staff has assembled a list of recommended budget goals based on the following: 1) The adopted Active Transportation Plan including tiered projects that correspond to the upcoming paving schedule in the years 2025-27. Projects already in progress with obligated grant funds have been given higher priority. 2) Projects from the Vision Zero program1. 3) Prior input from the Active Transportation Committee on issues of concern The list of recommended budget goals is organized into projects and programs and is prioritized from most to least important to fund as shown below: Projects 1) Active Transportation Plan Tier 1 Project Deployment a. Higuera Complete Streets Project: Complete design and construction. While this project has been recommended $6.95 million of state Active Transportation Program funds it would still require 20% local match funds. Given construction cost increases since awarding of the grant, it is important that the project have complete funding. Additional funding requests would be for potential construction contingency funds. 1 The City’s Draft Vision Zero Action Plan is planned for public release in early December 2024. The City’s High- Injury Network, which is a primary focus area for safety improvements in the forthcoming Vision Zero Action Plan, has been uploaded to the City’s Traffic Safety Website for early reference. Page 44 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 3 b. Broad Street (South to Orcutt) Quick Build Project: Complete design and construction of a quick-build demonstration project. This project was awarded $400,000 in Federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) funding for a demonstration project. This project would require a combination of grant and city funds to advance the following: a. Preparation of a concept plan for the South Broad St Corridor b. Implementation of a quick-build demonstration project Budget requests in a future budget (2027-29) would ensure carrying out grant deliverables as well as permanent improvements as part of scheduled paving of Broad Street in 2027. c. Foothill Blvd Quick Build Project: Complete design and Construction. d. Pedestrian Crossing South/King: Project is funded via SLOCOG Community Betterments Grant and is on schedule to advertise for construction in early 2025. Additional funding requests would be for potential construction contingency funds. e. Roundabout at California/Taft: This project is an ATP Tier 1 crossing improvement and would provide a better connection across California Blvd to the Railroad Safety Trail and improve safety at the California/Taft intersection. Planning and design is substantially complete and right-of-way negotiations are in progress. Additional funding would be for construction, assuming right-of-way acquisition is successful. f. Railroad Safety Trail along Bullock Lane and Orcutt Rd Railroad Crossing Improvements: This project would provide a continuous shared use path from Tank Farm Rd to the train station but would likely require a city-initiated project to acquire approvals from Union Pacific. Project was partially funded in the 2023-2025 Financial Plan but deferred and partially defunded due to insufficient staffing resources and funding needs for other shovel-ready capital projects. g. Shared Use Path on Madonna Road Overpass: Conceptual plans and traffic analysis has been prepared. Staff will be seeking input from Council in February 2025 on whether to advance the shared use path option considering the projected traffic impacts. If Council is supportive, the ATC could identify this project as a priority to fund to a more detailed design. h. Tank Farm Road Shared Use Path: Design, complete environmental study, acquire right-of-way in FY 2023-25 and construct in an outlying year. The design and environmental technical studies are conditions of approval for the 600 Tank Farm project and are nearly complete. Historically, it was assumed that planned upgrades to the Tank Farm corridor between Innovation Way and Santa Fe would be constructed as part of the ultimate redevelopment of the Chevron Tank Farm site. However, given that there are no immediate plans to develop this property, this project would initiate a City-led capital improvement project to advance construction of a shared-use path as an initial phase of larger corridor improvements. Note that there are significant complexities and challenges to advancing this project at this time, including potential contamination and remediation concerns and need for private right-of-way acquisition. 2) Complete Street Elements of Annual Paving Projects (2025-2027)* a. Tank Farm Road (Broad Street to Orcutt Road) - 2025 b. Sacramento Drive (Industrial Road to Via Esteban) - 2025 c. Johnson Ave (Bishop St to Buchan St) - 2026 d. Mill St (Chorro St to California Blvd) - 2026 e. Broad St (Pacific St to Tank Farm Rd) - 2027 Page 45 of 69 Active Transportation Committee Page 4 f. Industrial Rd (Broad St to Railroad) - 2027 g. Pavement Area 2 (neighborhood streets in the general area south of the railroad station, east of the railroad, and north of Orcutt Rd) - 2026 h. Pavement Area 3 (neighborhood streets in the general area south of South St and east of the Margarita Area extending to Orcutt Rd and the southern city limit) - 2026 *Potential complete street elements identified for streets currently scheduled in the Draft 2024-29 Pavement Management Plan; however, actual street segments advanced with each annual paving project will depend on funding resources and potential conflicts with concurrent underground utility projects. 3) Continue Miscellaneous Annual Bike and Pedestrian Minor Improvements ($100k for each mode) 4) Continue Funding for Resurfacing of Shared Use Paths Programs 1) Continue and increase education regarding Active Transportation in partnership with non-profit organizations and agency partners about safety topics and use of new facilities. Next Steps The ATC’s recommended goals will be transmitted to the Finance Department and a master list of all advisory body goal recommendations will be published ahead of the Council Goal Setting Workshop in February 2025 Recommendation Recommend a prioritized list of budget goals for the upcoming FY 2025-27 Financial Plan based on the Active Transportation Plan goals and priority projects. Attachments 1—Advisory Bodies 2025-27 Financial Plan Goal Setting Parameters 2—Active Transportation Committee Budget Goal Recommendations for FY 2023-25 3—List of funded active transportation projects from the 2023-25 Financial Plan 4—2023-25 Financial Plan at a Glance 5—Active Transportation Plan Tier 1 projects with ATC prioritization on 9/16/22 Page 46 of 69 Advisory Bodies 2025-27 Financial Plan Goal Setting Parameters 1Page 47 of 69 San Luis Obispo is committed to… Good Fiscal Management Public Engagement Quality Services Page 48 of 69 3 Policy Context Section 802. Annual Budget Section 803. Public Hearing on the Budget Financial Plan Objectives Two -Year Budget City Charter Adopted Budget Policies Second Year Budget Links resources to identified community needs and Council goals. Establishes program policies and goals. Reinforces the importance of long-range, strategic planning. Promotes more orderly spending patterns. Reduces time and resources allocated to budget preparation. Council will review progress during the first year and approve appropriations for the second fiscal year. City Manager shall send to the Council a careful estimate of the amounts required for business and proper conduct of all departments/offices. Council shall hold a public hearing on the proposed budget at which interested persons desiring to be heard shall be given such opportunity. Page 49 of 69 A look-back on 2023-25 Financial Plan Objectives Adopted Major City Goals: 4 Page 50 of 69 2024-25 Budget Highlights Challenges Opportunities Damages from Winter 2023 storms necessitated costly repairs Early identification of looming costs to allow sufficient time to plan Cost escalation for labor and materials, internally and with contractors Strong history of sound financial management policies and practices Limited financial and staff resources to complete capital projects on schedule FEMA and CalOES reimbursement for storm expenditures to replenish reserves 5 Page 51 of 69 Overall Financial Forecast 6 All funds are in good financial standing based on current assumptions and recommendations Revenue growth is expected to moderate Expenditure growth needs to moderate as well Limited ability to fund net new programs Prior commitments are coming due and need to be budgeted for Investment in existing ongoing services, programs, and infrastructure take priority Page 52 of 69 7Considerations When Setting Goals Financial Plan Development Financial forecast Major City Goals Community input Commitment to fiscal sustainability Consideration of service levels Measure G-20 priorities Mandates Future needs City Charter Debt service obligations Fiscal and budget policies Advisory Bodies Strategic plans Local laws Macroeconomic conditions General Plan Core service requirements Page 53 of 69 Goal-Setting & the Budget Process The proposed Financial Plan Calendar will be presented to Council on 10/1/24 Page 54 of 69 QUESTIONS? 9 If you have any additional questions you can reach out to: Riley Kuhn - Principal Budget Analyst rtkuhn@slocity.org Emily Jackson - Finance Director ejackson@slocity.org Page 55 of 69 Page 56 of 69 Page 1 of 3 DATE: December 5, 2022 TO: Emily Jackson, Director of Finance FROM: Adam Fukushima, Staff Liaison to the Active Transportation Committee SUBJECT: FY 2023-25 Active Transportation Committee Recommended Goals On November 17, 2022 the Active Transportation Committee recommended its FY 2023-25 goals for Council consideration which are represented in the following table. Projects are ranked in order of importance from most to least desired to fund based on proposed projects identified in the Active Transportation Plan. Recommended Goal Why Goal is Important Candidate Funding ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN TIER 1 PROJECT DEPLOYMENT Higuera Complete Streets Project -Provide necessary matching funds for this state funded project -Complete design and construction Foothill Blvd Quick Build Project -Complete design and Construction Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon at South/King -Program and construct project Roundabout at California/Taft -Complete design and construct Railroad Safety Trail Gap at Bullock Lane -Acquire approvals from Union Pacific and construct This projects improves north-south cross-town connectivity for active transportation and Safe Routes to School improvements to Hawthorne Elementary and Laguna Middle Schools Improves east-west connectivity between Cal Poly, residences, and activity centers along Foothill Improves connectivity to Hawthorne Elementary School, Meadow Park, and residences Provides a safer connection to the Railroad Safety Trail across California Blvd Fills a gap in the RRST between the existing portion north of Orcutt Rd and new segment south to Tank Farm Rd Project Funding Sources: State funds Federal funds General fund City debt financing Fundraising efforts Measure G-20 Active Transportation Committee Page 57 of 69 Page 2 of 3 Broad Street (South to Orcutt) Quick Build Project -Design and construct Tank Farm Rd Shared Use Path -Complete design & environmental study, acquire right-of-way and construct in an outlying year Johnson St Improvements for Sydney Crossing -Complete design and construction COMPLETE STREETS ELEMENTS OF ANNUAL PAVING PROJECTS Monterey St (Santa Rosa- California) California Blvd (Phillips- Monterey) Johnson St (Buchon-Laurel) Santa Barbara St (Leff-Broad) Palm St (Pepper to Santa Rosa) including Neighborhood Greenway Orcutt Rd (Laurel-Johnson) Pavement Areas 1 and 8 including Neighborhood Greenway on Toro St Misc. Pedestrian Facility Improvements- Maintain $100,000 in annual funding for misc. projects such as safe routes to school, signing & striping projects ideally incorporated into other construction projects Misc. Bicycle Facility Improvements- Maintain $100,000 in annual funding for misc. projects such as safe routes to Improves connectivity and safety along this wide arterial street Improves a low stress, east-west connection for active transportation Improves Safe Routes to School to Sinsheimer Elementary School Completing these projects as part of other construction projects results in substantial cost savings. Completing these improvements as part of other construction projects results in substantial cost savings. Completing these improvements as part of other construction projects results in substantial cost savings. Page 58 of 69 Page 3 of 3 school, signing & striping projects ideally incorporated into other construction projects. Ped/Bikeway Maintenance: Maintain $150,000 annually for bicycle and pedestrian facilities Sidewalk Replacement and Installation: Maintain $250,000 annually for curb ramp and sidewalk upgrades Performing pavement maintenance and weed control on pedestrian and bicycle paths will increase the life of these facilities and reduce the risk of collisions Completing these improvements as part of other construction projects results in substantial cost savings. PROGRAMS Safe Routes to School: Complete a Safe Routes to School Plan for SLO High School It is a goal of the Active Transportation Plan to complete, over time, a Safe Routes to School Plan for each school in the city. A plan for SLO High School will help refine proposed active transportation improvements around the high school Program Funding Sources: State and Federal grants Transportation Development Act funds General fund Measure G STAFFING Active Transportation Manager and Transportation Planner/Engineers: Maintain positions. The City has made a commitment to complete a Tier 1 network identified in the Active Transportation Plan. The Active Transportation Manager and Transportation Planner/Engineers are critical in sufficiently implementing the Tier 1 network projects and preparing grant applications. Staffing Funding Sources: General fund Measure G Page 59 of 69 Page 60 of 69 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) CIP Expenditure by Project and Task The tables below outline a complete list of all capital projects across all programs, departments, and funding sources. The tables present project budgets and/or cost estimates for the next five fiscal years. Although this Financial Plan only addresses budget allocations for Fiscal Year 2023-25, it is important to understand the larger picture and future capital project investments into and beyond the five-year period. The table is organized with the largest project budgets beginning in FY 2023-24, from top to bottom where the blue rows represent a project, and the white rows represent a given task or subproject within that project (if applicable). ID CIP #Project/Task 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2-Year Totals 5-Year Totals ϭ 1 Cultural Arts District Parking Structure 47,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 490,000$ -$ -$ 48,500,000$ 48,990,000$ Ϯ 2 Mid-Higuera Bypass 8,729,000$ 2,850,000$ -$ -$ -$ 11,579,000$ 11,579,000$ ϯ 3 ATP - Higuera Complete Street Project 8,251,000$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9,001,000$ 9,001,000$ ϰ 4 Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing 6,956,994$ 5,000,000$ 7,514,000$ 6,000,000$ 9,000,000$ 11,956,994$ 34,470,994$ ϱ 5 WRRF and Wastewater Collection Maintenance Facility 6,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,500,000$ 6,500,000$ ϲ 6 Waterline Replacement: Johnson - Iris to Bishop 3,300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,300,000$ 3,300,000$ ϳ 7 Storm Response and Recovery 2,750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,750,000$ 2,750,000$ ϴ 8 Bus Replacements with EV 2,701,500$ 2,226,000$ 3,055,110$ -$ 2,145,851$ 4,927,500$ 10,128,461$ ϵ 9 Mission Plaza Concept Plan Implementation 2,429,972$ 470,028$ 100,000$ 6,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 2,900,000$ 13,000,000$ ϭϬ 10 Storm Drain System Replacement 1,875,000$ 1,025,000$ 825,000$ 1,325,000$ 1,325,000$ 2,900,000$ 6,375,000$ ϭϭ 11 Transit Facility EV Charging Infrastructure 1,805,400$ 1,445,406$ 604,800$ -$ 414,000$ 3,250,806$ 4,269,606$ ϭϮ 12 Prado Road Interchange 1,435,260$ 2,750,000$ 91,350,000$ 6,585,000$ -$ 4,185,260$ 102,120,260$ ϭϯ 13 Sewer-main Replacements: Taft, Hathaway, Phillips, Buena Vista, and Loomis 1,225,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,225,000$ 1,225,000$ ϭϰ 14 Major Facility Maintenance 1,152,000$ 423,178$ 625,000$ 1,928,776$ 2,015,000$ 1,575,178$ 6,143,954$ ϭϱ ϴϳϵ Dorro Ͳ ZooĨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϲ dranƐition Plan Implementation ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳ CitǇ CoƵntǇ CommƵnitǇ Zoom dI ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴ CitǇ ,all roƵŐŚt dolerant >anĚƐĐapinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵ CitǇ ,all &ire larm &ire larm Control Panel ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ CitǇͬCoƵntǇ >iďrarǇ Ĩront ƐtepƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭ Corp zarĚ &Ƶel IƐlanĚ ^iĚinŐ ͬ ZeĐoatinŐ oĨ &Ƶel IƐlanĚ anĚ iƐpenƐerƐ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮ Corp zarĚ ZooĨ CoatinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϯ merŐenĐǇ CommƵniĐationƐ Center torŬƐtationͬCarpet ZeplaĐementƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϰϯ͕ϳϳϲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϰϯ͕ϳϳϲΨ Ϯϰ nerŐǇ DanaŐement ControlƐ hpŐraĚe ϭϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ ǆiƐtinŐ ^>K ZepertorǇ dŚeater denant ImprovementƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϲ &aĐilitǇ Zoll hp oor ZeplaĐementƐ Ͳ sarioƵƐ >oĐationƐ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϳ &ire ^tation ηϭ ĚminiƐtration lĚŐ͘ ZooĨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϴ &ire ^tation ηϰ Ͳ ǆterior Paint Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϵ &ire ^tation ϯ Θ ϰ Carpet ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ &leet >iĨtƐ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϭ ,sC ir ,anĚler at ParŬinŐ ^erviĐeƐ ϮϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϮ ,ǇĚration ^tationƐ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯ Id Zoom ,eat PƵmp ZeplaĐementƐ ϭϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϳ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϰ :aĐŬ ,oƵƐe ZooĨ anĚ tiĚoǁƐ talŬ ZailinŐ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ >ƵĚǁiĐŬ anĚ ^enior Center Ͳ ǆterior Paint anĚ ^Śell ZeŚaď ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲ >ƵĚǁiĐŬ CommƵnitǇ Center Ͳ ZooĨ anĚ ^olar ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϳ ParŬƐ anĚ ZeĐreation ZooĨinŐ ^iĚinŐ anĚ ǆterior PaintinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϴ PoliĐe epartment ,sC PaĐŬaŐe hnit ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϵ PoliĐe epartment ,ǇĚroniĐ ^ǇƐtem PipinŐ ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ ZailroaĚ DƵƐeƵm ZooĨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϭ ZeĐreation ^iteƐ denant ImprovementƐ Ͳ CommƵnitǇ Zoomͬ>ƵĚǁiĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϮ ^enior Center ZooĨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϯ ^ǁim Center atŚ ,oƵƐe CeilinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϰ ^ǁim Center eĐŬ ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϱ ^ǁim Center &ƵrnaĐeƐ (Ϯ &ƵrnaĐeƐ)ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϲ ^ǁim Center DƵltipƵrpoƐe Zoom ĨloorinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϳ ^ǁim Center KlĚ atŚ ,oƵƐe ZooĨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϴ ^ǁim Center KlǇmpiĐ Pool dŚermal lanŬetƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϵ ^ǁim Center Pool tater CŚemiĐal ZeŐƵlator ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ dŚerapǇ Pool ^ŚaĚe ^trƵĐtƵre Daterial ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ϯϯ͕ϭϳϴΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϯ͕ϭϳϴΨ ϯϯ͕ϭϳϴΨ Table 69: )LQDQFLDO 3ODQ 3DJH Page 61 of 69 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ID CIP #Project/Task 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2-Year Totals 5-Year Totals ϱϭ 15 IT Replacement 1,145,500$ 2,011,001$ 2,695,000$ 911,099$ 980,794$ 3,156,501$ 7,743,393$ ϱϮ ϵϭϭ PŚone ^ǇƐtem ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϴϵ͕ϴϭϵΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϴϵ͕ϴϭϵΨ ϱϯ ĐĐeƐƐ Control (ƵtomatiĐ 'ate CarĚ ^ǇƐtem) ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϰ ƐƐet DanaŐement (CitǇǁorŬƐ Ͳ htilitieƐ InteŐration)ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϱ ƵĚio ZeĐorĚinŐ ^ǇƐtem ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϳϯ͕ϴϵϭΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϳϯ͕ϴϵϭΨ ϱϲ oĚǇ torn CameraƐ͕ siĚeo ^toraŐe anĚ Intervieǁ ZoomƐ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϳ CͬZD^ ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ϵϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϵϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϴ CͬZD^ ^tƵĚǇ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϵ CitǇ ^E ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϮϯ͕ϰϭϯΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϮϯ͕ϰϭϯΨ ϲϬ iƐpatĐŚ ZaĚio ConƐoleƐ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϭ CC CompƵterƐ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϮ CC ƵĚio siƐƵal ^ǇƐtem ͲΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϯ CC ƋƵipment ZeplaĐement ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϵ͕ϯϵϯΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϵ͕ϯϵϯΨ ϲϰ CC hP^ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϭ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϭ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϱ ƐĐriďe replaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϲ &ire ^tation lertinŐ ^ǇƐtem ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϳ &ireǁall ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϴ Dotion ZP ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϵ EetǁorŬ ^eĐƵritǇ hpŐraĚe ͲΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϯϲ͕ϭϯϭΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϲϭ͕ϭϯϭΨ ϳϬ EetǁorŬ ^ǁitĐŚinŐ InĨraƐtrƵĐtƵre ƋƵipment ϱϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϭ ParŬƐ Θ ZeĐ ĐtiveEet ^oĨtǁare ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϮ P ^E ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϯ͕ϭϵϵΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϯ͕ϭϵϵΨ ϳϯ PͬCitǇ ďaĐŬƵp ƐtoraŐe͕ ƐeĐonĚarǇ ƐtoraŐe ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϰ PoliĐe C ,arĚǁare (^erverƐ anĚ ^toraŐe)ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬϱ͕ϳϰϲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬϱ͕ϳϰϲΨ ϳϱ PƵďliĐ ^aĨetǇ DC anĚ InͲCar siĚeo ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϰϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϵϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϲ PƵďliĐ ^aĨetǇ ^peĐialiǌeĚ ^ƵrveillanĐe ĐameraƐ (PKƐ) ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϳϳϳΨ ϱϬ͕ϲϰϴΨ ͲΨ ϭϳϰ͕ϰϮϱΨ ϳϳ PƵďliĐ ^ƵrveillanĐe CameraƐ ͲĐitǇǁiĚe ϱ Ǉear replaĐe ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϱϭ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϭ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϴ PƵďliĐ ^ƵrveillanĐe CitǇǁiĚe CameraƐ ^toraŐe aĚĚ reĚƵnĚanĐǇ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϵ ZaĚio ,anĚŚelĚƐ Θ DoďileƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϬ ZaĚioƐ͕ DoďileƐ anĚ ƐtationƐ not replaĐeĚ Ͳ & Θ Pt KnlǇ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϭ ^eĐƵritǇ siĚeo ^ǇƐtem ZeplaĐement (Camera ^oĨtǁare)ϱϱ͕ϱϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϱ͕ϱϬϬΨ ϱϱ͕ϱϬϬΨ ϴϮ hninterrƵptiďle Poǁer ^ƵpplieƐ (hP^͛Ɛ ^erverƐ anĚ ^toraŐe)ͲΨ ϱϭ͕ϬϬϭΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϯ͕ϱϴϲΨ ϱϭ͕ϬϬϭΨ ϭϬϰ͕ϱϴϳΨ ϴϯ htilitǇ illinŐ ^ǇƐtem ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϰ sirtƵal Private EetǁorŬ ZeplaĐe ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϱ sDǁare InĨraƐtrƵĐtƵre hpŐraĚe ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϰϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϰϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϲ soIP delepŚone ^ǇƐtem ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϳ tireleƐƐ ^ǇƐtem CitǇǁiĚe ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϱ͕ϮϵϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϱ͕ϮϵϬΨ ϴϴ 16 Parks and Rec General Plan Implementation 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ 800,000$ ϴϵ 17 Fleet Replacement: Public Works 770,000$ 395,000$ 612,000$ 1,110,000$ 1,385,000$ 1,165,000$ 4,272,000$ ϵϬ nŐineerinŐ CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϭ nŐineerinŐ CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϮ nŐineerinŐ CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϯ &aĐilitieƐ DaintenanĐe ϯͬϰ ton PiĐŬƵp ǁitŚ htilitǇ eĚ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϰ &leet Dotor Pool CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϱ ParŬ DaintenanĐe Doǁer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϲ ParŬinŐ CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϳ ParŬinŐ ^ĐooterƐͬ>PZ eƋƵippeĚ veŚiĐle ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϴ ParŬƐ Daint Doǁer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϵ ParŬƐ Daint ZeĨƵƐe drƵĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ ParŬƐ Daint dƵrĨ denĚer ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϭ ParŬƐ DaintenanĐe ϯͬϰ ton PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ϭϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϮ ParŬƐ DaintenanĐe CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϯ ParŬƐ DaintenanĐe CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϰ ParŬƐ DaintenanĐe drailerƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϱ Pt DaintenanĐe ^ƵperviƐor seŚiĐle ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϲ ^tormǁater CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϳ ^tormǁater ,ǇĚro Đleaner ϲϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϴ ^treetƐ Daint , ir raŬe drailer ͲΨ ϱϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϵ ^treetƐ Daint CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϬ ^treetƐ Daint , ZollͲKĨĨ drƵĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϭ ^treetƐ Daint Paver ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϮ ^treetƐ DaintenanĐe ϯͬϰ ton PiĐŬƵp &ϭϱϬ eleĐtriĐͬŚǇďriĚ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϯ ^treetƐ DaintenanĐe aĐŬŚoe ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϰ ^treetƐ DaintenanĐe CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp Ͳ ZeplaĐe ǁͬ san ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϱ ^treetƐ DaintenanĐe Zoller ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϲ ^treetƐ DaintenanĐe drailerƐ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϳ ^treetƐͲ ^ǁeeper ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϴϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϴ ^ƵpplieƐ͕ ^oĨtǁare anĚ doolƐ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϭϵ hrďan &oreƐt CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ƐĐape ,Ǉď t Ĩor rďoriƐt ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Table 69 (continued): )LQDQFLDO 3ODQ 3DJH Page 62 of 69 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ID CIP #Project/Task 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2-Year Totals 5-Year Totals ϭϮϬ 18 Water Storage Tank Major Maintenance 755,000$ 1,000,000$ 127,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,755,000$ 4,082,000$ ϭϮϭ Ěna danŬ ZeĐoatinŐ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭ͕ϬϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϬϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϮ ZeƐervoir Ϯ Cover ZeplaĐement ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϯ taƐŚ ǁater tanŬ ηϭ ϰϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϰ tater ^toraŐe danŬ DaintenanĐe ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϮϳ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ Ϯ͕ϯϮϳ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϱ 19 General Parking Structure Maintenance 700,000$ 700,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,400,000$ 4,600,000$ ϭϮϲ 20 Water Treatment Plant - Building Maintenance 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 650,000$ 650,000$ ϭϮϳ 21 Park Major Maintenance & Repairs 520,000$ 440,000$ 710,000$ 1,410,000$ 1,117,500$ 960,000$ 4,197,500$ ϭϮϴ dranƐition Plan Implementation ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϵ ConĐrete enĐŚ Θ daďle ZeplaĐement sarioƵƐ >oĐationƐ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϬ evaƵl aƐŬetďall CoƵrt ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϭ IrriŐation Dainline >eaŬ Zepair ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϮ IƐlaǇ ParŬ ĨlatǁorŬ replaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϯ :aĐŬ ,oƵƐe rďor ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϰ :oŚnƐon ParŬ ƐiĚeǁalŬ anĚ tree replaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϱ :oŚnƐon ParŬ ^iĚeǁalŬ ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϲ >aŐƵna >aŬe oĐŬƐ anĚ Zamp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϳ >anĚƐĐape Controller ^ǇƐtem hpŐraĚe to Cal ƐenƐe ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϴ DaĚonna ZoaĚ >anĚƐĐapinŐ anĚ IrriŐation ZeplaĐement ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϵ DaƐter salve anĚ &loǁ ^enƐinŐ InƐtallationƐ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϬ DeaĚoǁ ParŬ ǆerĐiƐeͬPar CoƵrƐe ƋƵipment ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϭ DiƐƐion Plaǌa ZailinŐ hpŐraĚe ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϮ DitĐŚell ParŬ ZeplaĐement ZeƐtroom oorƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϯ ParŬƐ PlaǇ ^ƵrĨaĐinŐ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϰ ^anta ZoƐa arďeĐƵe ZeplaĐementƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϱ ^anta ZoƐa ParŬ DonƵment ^iŐn ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϲ ^inƐŚeimer ,illƐiĚe tƵrĨ (ϱ Ǉear ĐǇĐle)ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϳ ^inƐŚeimer oƵtĨielĚ ǁall replaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϰϴ ^inƐŚeimer PlaǇŐroƵnĚ dƵrĨ anĚ ^oĨt ^ƵrĨaĐe ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳ͕ϱϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳ͕ϱϬϬΨ ϭϰϵ ^inƐŚeimer ^taĚiƵm leaĐŚerƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϴϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ ^inƐŚeimer ^taĚiƵm &enĐinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϭ ^inƐŚeimer ^taĚiƵm >iŐŚtinŐ ĚĚition ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϮ tater ^tationƐ anĚ ^ƵpplǇ >ineƐ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϯ 22 ATP - South/King Crossing 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ ϭϱϰ 23 California & Taft Roundabout 500,000$ -$ 3,022,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 3,522,000$ ϭϱϱ 24 Development Related Park Improvements 500,000$ 5,423,642$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 5,923,642$ 6,173,642$ ϭϱϲ KrĐƵtt rea Ͳ >inear ParŬ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϳ KrĐƵtt rea Ͳ EeiŐŚďorŚooĚ ParŬ ͲΨ ϱ͕ϰϮϯ͕ϲϰϮΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱ͕ϰϮϯ͕ϲϰϮΨ ϱ͕ϰϮϯ͕ϲϰϮΨ ϭϱϴ KrĐƵtt rea Ͳ PoĐŬet ParŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϵ 25 Active Transportation Plan Implementation 435,000$ 550,000$ 520,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 985,000$ 6,305,000$ ϭϲϬ Đtive dranƐportation Plan dier ϭ EetǁorŬ Implementation ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰ͕ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϲϭ rea ^ealinŐ ProũeĐtƐ Complete ^treet ComponentƐ Ϯϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕Ϭϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϲϮ iĐǇĐle &aĐilitǇ ImprovementƐ ϱϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϲϯ iŬeƐŚare ^ǇƐtem Implementation ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϲϰ PeĚeƐtrian &aĐilitǇ ImprovementƐ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϵϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϲϱ 26 Urban Forest Maintenance 420,000$ 440,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 860,000$ 2,210,000$ ϭϲϲ 27 Water Meters and Boxes 335,000$ 343,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 678,000$ 1,728,000$ ϭϲϳ 28 Parking Enforcement Equipment at Gate Entry 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ ϭϲϴ 29 ATP - Railroad Safety Trail (Orcutt to Tiburon) and Bullock Culvert Replacement 300,000$ 100,000$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 2,400,000$ ϭϲϵ 30 Parking Lot Maintenance 285,000$ 745,000$ 515,000$ 1,330,000$ 615,000$ 1,030,000$ 3,490,000$ ϭϳϬ amon 'arĐia ^portƐ &ielĚ Compleǆ ͲΨ ϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϭ &ire ^tation Ϯ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϮ :oŚnƐon ParŬ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϯ >aŐƵna >aŬe ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭ͕ϯϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϰ >aŐƵna >aŬe 'olĨ CoƵrƐe ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϱ >ƵĚǁiĐŬ CommƵnitǇ Center ͲΨ ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϲ DeaĚoǁ ParŬ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϳ Dinor Zepair oĨ CitǇ ParŬinŐ >otƐ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϴ DitĐŚell ParŬ anĚ ^>K ^enior CitiǌenƐ Center ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϵ Eeǁ parŬinŐ lot DaintenanĐe ProũeĐtƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϬ ^anta ZoƐa ParŬ ͲΨ ϰϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϭ ^inƐŚeimer ParŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯϵϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϮ dŚroop ParŬ ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϵϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϯ 31 Water Utility Trench Repair 280,000$ 280,000$ 280,000$ 280,000$ 280,000$ 560,000$ 1,400,000$ ϭϴϰ 32 Water Valve Cover Adjustments 276,000$ 35,000$ 35,000$ 35,000$ 35,000$ 311,000$ 416,000$ ϭϴϱ 33 Sewer-main Replacement: Morro, Mill, Santa Rosa, and Chorro 253,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 253,000$ 253,000$ ϭϴϲ 34 Water Distribution System - Point Repairs 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 750,000$ Table 69 (continued) )LQDQFLDO 3ODQ 3DJH Page 63 of 69 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ID CIP #Project/Task 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2-Year Totals 5-Year Totals ϭϴϳ 35 Water Treatment Plant – Asset Replacement 245,000$ 115,000$ 145,000$ 45,000$ 140,000$ 360,000$ 690,000$ ϭϴϴ ĐtiĨlo PolǇ lenĚ hnitƐ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϵ CŚlorine DeterinŐ PƵmp ^ŬiĚ at CŚemiĐal &eeĚ Zoom ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϬ CitǇǁorŬƐ InteŐration (ǁater)ͲΨ ϵϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϵϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϭ ContaĐt aƐin rain Zepair Ͳ Kǌone ^ǇƐtem ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϵϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϵϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϮ PaĐŬaŐe dŚiĐŬener ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϯ Pipe 'allerǇ CoatinŐƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϰ PƵrĐŚaƐe ^pare dP^ pƵmp͕ motor͕ anĚ s&ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϱ tater dreatment Plant Ͳ &aĐilitǇ ƐƐet ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϵϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϲ 36 Waterline Replacement: Santa Rosa - Stenner Creek Road to Highland 30-inch Pipeline 230,000$ -$ 8,230,000$ -$ -$ 230,000$ 8,460,000$ ϭϵϳ 37 Annual Public Art Maintenance and Projects 225,000$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 425,000$ 725,000$ ϭϵϴ PƵďliĐ rt nnƵal ƐƐet DaintenanĐe ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϵϵ ^mall PƵďliĐ rt ProũeĐtƐ ϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ htilitǇ oǆ eaƵtiĨǇ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϭ 38 Fleet Replacement: Utilities 220,000$ 150,000$ 948,772$ 87,500$ 1,568,000$ 370,000$ 2,974,272$ ϮϬϮ &leet ^erviĐeƐ seŚiĐle >iĨt ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϯ ϴϳϵ ĚminiƐtration PriƵƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϰ oat drailer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳ͕ϱϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳ͕ϱϬϬΨ ϮϬϱ nvironmental ComplianĐe Ͳ PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϲ nvironmental ComplianĐe Ͳ ^eĚan ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϳ &leet Ͳ ϰǆϰ ϯͬϰ don drƵĐŬ ǁͬhtilitǇ oǆ Θ Crane ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϴ &leet Ͳ ϰǆϰ ^hs Ͳ :eep ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϵ &leet Ͳ oƐton tŚaler ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϭϬ &leet Ͳ &ϭϱϬ ϰǆϰ PiĐŬͲƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϲ͕ϱϳϮΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϲ͕ϱϳϮΨ Ϯϭϭ &leet ^erviĐeƐ seŚiĐle >iĨt ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯ͕ϮϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯ͕ϮϬϬΨ ϮϭϮ ^eǁer tZZ& CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϯ ^eǁer ttC> Portaďle PƵmp ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϰ taƐte tater ColleĐtionƐ Ƶmp drƵĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϱ taƐteǁater ColleĐtionƐ Caterpillar ǆĐavator ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϲ tater iƐtriďƵtion aĐŬŚoe ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϳ tater iƐtriďƵtion CompaĐt piĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϴ tater iƐtriďƵtion CompaĐt PiĐŬƵpƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϭϵ tater iƐtriďƵtion DeƐƐaŐe oarĚ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϬ tater iƐtriďƵtion PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϭ tater iƐtriďƵtion ^erviĐe drƵĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϮ tater iƐtriďƵtion ^erviĐe drƵĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϯ tater iƐtriďƵtion ^ŬiĚ >oaĚer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϰ tater iƐtriďƵtion drailer ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϱ tater iƐtriďƵtion salve tƵrninŐ trailer ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϲ tŚale ZoĐŬ htilitǇ draĐtor ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϳ tZZ& htilitǇ CartƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϴ tdP ϭͬϮ ton Creǁ Caď ϰyϰ PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϮϵ tdP CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϯϬ ttC PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϯϭ 39 Emerson Park Amenity Upgrades and Beautification 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ ϮϯϮ 40 Fire Station 3&4 Remodel Space Study and Design 200,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 1,200,000$ Ϯϯϯ 41 ATP - Foothill Boulevard Complete Street Project 200,000$ -$ 2,400,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 2,600,000$ Ϯϯϰ 42 ATP - Orcutt Road Railroad Crossing Upgrades 200,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 700,000$ Ϯϯϱ 43 Sewer Lift Station Maintenance 200,000$ -$ 80,000$ -$ 80,000$ 200,000$ 360,000$ Ϯϯϲ 44 Development Agreement - City Share 200,000$ -$ 850,000$ 560,000$ 2,300,000$ 200,000$ 3,910,000$ Ϯϯϳ 45 Pismo Street Retaining Wall - Storm Response 200,000$ -$ 1,700,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 1,900,000$ Ϯϯϴ 46 Water Treatment Plant - Major Equipment Maintenance 189,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 369,000$ 909,000$ Ϯϯϵ CŚemiĐal ^ǇƐtem DaintenanĐe ϯϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϰϬ Kǌone ^ǇƐtem DaintenanĐe ϭϱϲ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϲ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϲ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϰϭ tdP Daũor DaintenanĐe ͲΨ ϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϰϮ 47 Sewer Maintenance Cover Adjustments 180,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 210,000$ 300,000$ Ϯϰϯ 48 Higuera St. Widening - Bridge to Elks 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000$ 180,000$ Ϯϰϰ 49 Electric Vehicle Charging Station at Various Facilities 175,000$ 100,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 275,000$ 725,000$ Ϯϰϱ 50 Open Space Acquisition 175,000$ 150,000$ 250,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 325,000$ 875,000$ Ϯϰϲ 51 Open Space Maintenance 170,000$ 170,000$ 170,000$ 170,000$ 320,000$ 340,000$ 1,000,000$ Ϯϰϳ 'eneral Kpen ^paĐe DaintenanĐe ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϰϴ Kpen ^paĐe ClimateͲInĨormeĚ DaintenanĐe ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϰϵ Kpen ^paĐe &enĐinŐ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ 52 Bridge Preventative Maintenance 150,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 350,000$ 950,000$ Ϯϱϭ 53 Salinas Reservoir Transfer of Ownership Plan 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ ϮϱϮ 54 Silt Removal 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 300,000$ 750,000$ Ϯϱϯ 55 WRRF Power Cogeneration Upgrade 150,000$ -$ 1,475,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 1,625,000$ Ϯϱϰ 56 WRRF - Building Maintenance 150,000$ -$ 825,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 975,000$ Ϯϱϱ >aď Ěmin ,sC ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϱϲ tZZ& Ͳ ƵilĚinŐ DaintenanĐe ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Table 69 (continued) )LQDQFLDO 3ODQ 3DJH Page 64 of 69 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ID CIP #Project/Task 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2-Year Totals 5-Year Totals Ϯϱϳ 57 Vision Zero Program Implementation 140,000$ 120,000$ 120,000$ 120,000$ 120,000$ 260,000$ 620,000$ Ϯϱϴ 58 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway Maintenance 125,000$ 435,000$ 365,000$ 400,000$ 300,000$ 560,000$ 1,625,000$ Ϯϱϵ nĚreǁƐ anĚ :oŚnƐon iŬe PatŚ ͲΨ ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϲϬ rooŬpine anĚ ^paniƐŚ KaŬƐ drail ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϲϭ PatŚǁaǇ DaintenanĐe sarioƵƐ >oĐationƐ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϲϮ Pavement rea Ϯ Θ ϯ iŬe PatŚ ^ealinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϲϯ ZailroaĚ ^aĨetǇ drail ͲΨ Ϯϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϲϰ 59 Wastewater Collections System - Point Repairs 120,000$ -$ 120,000$ -$ 120,000$ 120,000$ 360,000$ Ϯϲϱ 60 Sidewalk Replacement and Installation 100,000$ 150,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ Ϯϲϲ CƵrď ZampƐ anĚ ^iĚeǁalŬƐ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϲϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϲϳ ^treet dree ^iĚeǁalŬƐ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϲϴ 61 Waterline Replacement: Chorro - Highland to Meinecke 24-inch Pipeline Replacement 100,000$ 1,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ Ϯϲϵ 62 871 Marsh Street Structure Maintenance 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ ϮϳϬ 63 Roundabout Public Art Installations 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 700,000$ Ϯϳϭ 64 842 Palm Parking Structure Maintenance 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ ϮϳϮ 65 License Plate Recognition Replacement 97,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 97,000$ 97,000$ Ϯϳϯ 66 Bus Shelter Replacements 90,000$ 90,000$ 90,000$ 90,000$ 90,000$ 180,000$ 450,000$ Ϯϳϰ 67 Street Lights - Annual Asset Maintenance 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 150,000$ 385,000$ Ϯϳϱ 68 Fleet Replacement: Parks and Recreation 75,000$ -$ 70,000$ 80,000$ 85,000$ 75,000$ 310,000$ Ϯϳϲ 'olĨ CoƵrƐe Doǁer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϳϳ ParŬƐ anĚ ZeĐ Ěmin CompaĐt PiĐŬƵp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϳϴ ParŬƐͲ Doǁer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϴϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϳϵ ParŬƐ draĐtor ttaĐŚmentƐ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϴϬ 69 Traffic Signs & Striping Maintenance 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 150,000$ 375,000$ Ϯϴϭ 70 Sewer Lift Station Replacement - Silver City 70,000$ 100,000$ 1,980,000$ -$ -$ 170,000$ 2,150,000$ ϮϴϮ 71 Whale Rock Reservoir - Asset Replacement 67,542$ 128,923$ 45,398$ 20,000$ 220,000$ 196,465$ 481,863$ Ϯϴϯ vaporationͬteatŚer ^tationƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϯϵϴΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϯϵϴΨ Ϯϴϰ ZeplaĐement oĨ PieǌometerƐ ͲΨ ϭϬϴ͕ϵϮϯΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϴ͕ϵϮϯΨ ϭϬϴ͕ϵϮϯΨ Ϯϴϱ ZeƐervoir &enĐinŐ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϴϲ ^tillinŐ aƐin ϰϳ͕ϱϰϮΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϳ͕ϱϰϮΨ ϰϳ͕ϱϰϮΨ Ϯϴϳ salve ZeplaĐementƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯϴϴ 72 Fire Hydrants 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 110,000$ 275,000$ Ϯϴϵ 73 Transportation Monitoring & Modeling Update 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 55,000$ 110,000$ 275,000$ ϮϵϬ 74 Whale Rock Transmission Pipeline Replacement 51,000$ -$ 60,000$ 510,000$ 550,300$ 51,000$ 1,171,300$ Ϯϵϭ 75 Waterline Abandonment & Connections 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 250,000$ ϮϵϮ 76 Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 45,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 75,000$ 165,000$ Ϯϵϯ 77 Banner Arms, Bench Arm Rests, Signs 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$ 125,000$ Ϯϵϰ 78 Sewer Utility Trench Repair 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$ 125,000$ Ϯϵϱ 79 Sewer-main Replacement: Serrano, Bressi, Dana and Higuera Pipeline Replacement 25,000$ 1,275,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ 1,300,000$ Ϯϵϲ 80 Laguna Lake Golf Course Maintenance 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 100,000$ Ϯϵϳ 81 Water Treatment Plant - Water Meter Replacement 10,000$ 30,000$ 54,800$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 94,800$ Ϯϵϴ rǇinŐ eĚ DeterƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰ͕ϴϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰ͕ϴϬϬΨ Ϯϵϵ ^alinaƐ tater Deter ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬϬ tater dreatment Plant Ͳ tater Deter ZeplaĐement ϭϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬϭ 82 Buchon-Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ ϯϬϮ 83 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act GSP -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 600,000$ ϯϬϯ 84 Parking Lot Maintenance - Bus Yard -$ 25,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 525,000$ ϯϬϰ 85 WRRF - Demolish Old Effluent Structure -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 495,000$ -$ 545,000$ ϯϬϱ 86 Dalidio Drive Access Improvements -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 75,000$ -$ 100,000$ ϯϬϲ 87 WRRF Asset Replacement -$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 75,000$ 200,000$ 125,000$ 525,000$ ϯϬϳ CoatinŐ DaintenanĐe ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬϴ ǆiƐtinŐ CoŐen DaintenanĐe (Dϳ)ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϬϵ ZeďƵilĚ InĨlƵent ^torm PƵmpƐ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϭϬ hs Ƶlď ZeplaĐement (annƵal replaĐement)ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϭϭ 88 Waterline Replacement: Highland at UPRR and Cal Poly -$ -$ -$ 850,000$ -$ -$ 850,000$ ϯϭϮ 89 Emily Street Extension -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ 200,000$ ϯϭϯ 90 Prado Road Bridge & Road Widening -$ 18,373,000$ 7,750,000$ -$ -$ 18,373,000$ 26,123,000$ ϯϭϰ 91 Major Facility Replacements -$ 350,000$ 1,040,000$ 3,100,000$ 3,500,000$ 350,000$ 7,990,000$ ϯϭϱ Corporation zarĚ dI ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭ͕ϱϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϭϲ eďt ^erviĐe Ͳ P ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϯ͕ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯ͕ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϭϳ PoliĐe ƵilĚinŐ ^topͲ'ap ImprovementƐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϭϴ PoliĐe ^tation ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ Ϯ͕ϯϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϭϵ 92 Downtown Transit Center Rehabilitation (Transit Fund)-$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ 1,640,000$ ϯϮϬ 93 Climate Action Plan Support - Carshare Program -$ -$ -$ -$ 115,000$ -$ 115,000$ ϯϮϭ 94 Sewer Inflow/Infiltration Reduction -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ ϯϮϮ 95 Water Storage Tank Inspection and Cleaning -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 250,000$ -$ 300,000$ ϯϮϯ 96 Laguna Lake Golf Course Irrigation Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 300,000$ ϯϮϰ 97 Lead by Example -$ 100,000$ 78,000$ 765,000$ 570,000$ 100,000$ 1,513,000$ ϯϮϱ ƵilĚinŐ leĐtriĨiĐation Ͳ CitǇ ,all ,eat PƵmp ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϴ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϱϭϴ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϱϵϲ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϮϲ ƵilĚinŐ leĐtriĨiĐation Ͳ ^ǁim Center ,eat PƵmp ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϴϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϮϳ &ire ^tation ϭ leĐtriĨiĐation ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϱϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ Table 69 (continued) )LQDQFLDO 3ODQ 3DJH Page 65 of 69 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ID CIP #Project/Task 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2-Year Totals 5-Year Totals ϯϮϴ 98 Waterline Replacement: Patricia, Highland, and La Entrada -$ -$ -$ 127,000$ 1,397,000$ -$ 1,524,000$ ϯϮϵ 99 City Hall Exterior Lighting -$ -$ 50,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ ϯϯϬ 100 Old Garden Creek Retaining Wall -$ -$ 175,000$ -$ 800,000$ -$ 975,000$ ϯϯϭ 101 Fleet Replacement: Police -$ 90,000$ 350,000$ 482,000$ 1,201,500$ 90,000$ 2,123,500$ ϯϯϮ Ěmin ^eĚan ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϰϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯϯ CommƵniĐationƐ >ieƵtenant seŚiĐle ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϮ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯϰ &^d DaveriĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯϱ InveƐtiŐationƐ ^eĚan ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯϲ InveƐtiŐationƐ ^eĚan ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯϳ InveƐtiŐationƐ ^hs ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϲϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯϴ PoliĐe &^d drƵĐŬ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϯϵ PoliĐe InveƐtiŐationƐ nĐloƐeĚ drailer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ Ϯϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϰϬ PoliĐe InveƐtiŐationƐ ^eĚan ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϰϭ PoliĐe DotorĐǇĐleƐ ͲΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϰϮ PoliĐe Patrol leĐtriĐ ^hs ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϰϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϰϯ PoliĐe Patrol ,ǇďriĚ ^hs ͲΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϳϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϰϯϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϰϰ PƵďliĐ ^aĨetǇ Doďile CommanĚ seŚiĐleͬCitǇ KC ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϱϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϰϱ drƵĐŬ to toǁ tŚe Doďile CommanĚ drailer ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϴϭ͕ϱϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϴϭ͕ϱϬϬΨ ϯϰϲ 102 Sewer-main Replacement: Bee Bee - South Street to Sandercock -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ ϯϰϳ 103 T-3 Water Storage Tank Replacement - High Pressure Zone -$ 900,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 900,000$ 1,400,000$ ϯϰϴ 104 Sewer-main Replacement: Broad, Murray, and Chorro -$ -$ -$ -$ 145,000$ -$ 145,000$ ϯϰϵ 105 Sewer-main Replacement: Buchon - Morro to Johnson Pipeline Replacement -$ -$ -$ 135,000$ 2,485,000$ -$ 2,620,000$ ϯϱϬ 106 Downtown Zig-Zag Lighting -$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ ϯϱϭ 107 Sewer-main Replacement: Chorro - Boysen to Rougeot -$ 250,000$ 2,750,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 3,000,000$ ϯϱϮ 108 Sewer-main Replacement: Foothill Siphon -$ -$ 200,000$ 250,000$ 2,750,000$ -$ 3,200,000$ ϯϱϯ 109 Parking Pay Station Installation -$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ -$ 600,000$ 1,800,000$ ϯϱϰ 110 Fire Station 4 Metal Building Gym Space -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ ϯϱϱ 111 Corporation Yard Perimeter Fence Replacement -$ -$ 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ ϯϱϲ 112 Sewer-main Replacement: San Jose, Ramona, Monte Vista, and California -$ 1,225,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,225,000$ 1,225,000$ ϯϱϳ 113 Laguna Lake Dredging and Sediment Management Project Implementation -$ 900,000$ -$ 900,000$ -$ 900,000$ 1,800,000$ ϯϱϴ 114 Fleet Replacement: Admin -$ 250,000$ 175,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 525,000$ ϯϱϵ CitǇ ,all 'enerator ('EͲϵϳϭϮ)ͲΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϮϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϬ CommƵnitǇ s CŚarŐinŐ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϭ oǁntoǁn CleaninŐ ƋƵipment ͲΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϮ 115 SLO Creek Walk Maintenance - Lighting, Signage, Irrigation, Plants -$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ 500,000$ ϯϲϯ 116 Playground Equipment Replacement -$ -$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ 3,800,000$ ϯϲϰ nŚolm PlaǇŐroƵnĚ ƋƵipment ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϲϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϱ esaƵl ZanĐŚ PlaǇŐroƵnĚ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϲ &renĐŚ ParŬ PlaǇŐroƵnĚ ƋƵipment ZeplaĐement ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϳ >aŐƵna ,illƐ PlaǇŐroƵnĚ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϭ͕ϬϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϴ DitĐŚell ParŬ PlaǇŐroƵnĚ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϵϱϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϲϵ siƐta >aŐo Dini ParŬ PlaǇŐroƵnĚ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ͲΨ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬΨ ϯϳϬ 117 Source Water Strategic Plan -$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000$ 90,000$ ϯϳϭ 118 Waterline Replacement: Rockview - Stoneridge to Broad -$ -$ 130,000$ 1,530,000$ -$ -$ 1,660,000$ ϯϳϮ 119 South Street Median Landscaping -$ -$ 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ ϯϳϯ 120 Waterline Replacement: Stenner Canyon at Reservoir -$ -$ 80,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ 1,180,000$ ϯϳϰ 121 Whale Rock Pump Station Electrical Repairs (A and B)-$ 1,960,620$ -$ -$ -$ 1,960,620$ 1,960,620$ ϯϳϱ 122 Downtown Renewal -$ 200,000$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ 200,000$ 2,200,000$ ϯϳϲ 123 Recycled Waterline at Orcutt Street - Fernwood to Laurel -$ 25,000$ 675,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 700,000$ ϯϳϳ 124 WRRF Asset Replacement - Screw Press -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 3,360,000$ -$ 3,560,000$ ϯϳϴ 125 Recycled Waterline at Tank Farm - Long to Innovation Pipeline -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 625,000$ -$ 650,000$ ϯϳϵ 126 Recycled Water Annual UV Bulb Replacement -$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 40,000$ ϯϴϬ 127 WTP - Filter Media Replacement and Underdrain Repairs -$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 250,000$ -$ 370,000$ ϯϴϭ 128 Recycled Water Pump Station Maintenance -$ 60,000$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ ϯϴϮ 129 Recycled Water Storage Tank -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 20,000$ 383 CIP Reserve 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 8,000,000$ 20,000,000$ 384 Grand Total 116,020,168$ 67,269,798$ 162,576,880$ 56,196,375$ 62,979,945$ 183,289,966$ 465,043,165$ Table 69 (continued) )LQDQFLDO 3ODQ 3DJH Page 66 of 69 Administration/IT $10,850 City Attorney $1,425 Finance & Non-Departmental $3,880 Human Resources $2,141 Total $18,297 Internal Services (15%) Fire $15,274 Police* $22,086 Total $37,360 Public Safety (31%) Community Development $8,213 Parks & Recreation $5,706 Public Works $17,718 CSG Admin $740 Solid Waste Division $341 Total $32,719 Community Services (27%) Capital Projects (25%) $29,728 Debt $1,854 Insurance $6,000 Transfers Out/(In) ($9,930) Projected Salary Savings ($1,710) Storm Expenditures Estimate $4,500 CalPERS Additional Payment $2,000 Total $2,714 Other Operating Costs (2%) General Fund Revenue General Fund Expenditures About the Budget The City of San Luis Obispo follows a nationally recognized two-year Financial Plan process. The Financial Plan links goals and objectives with resources needed to accomplish them. Council approval is required for each year of the budget cycle in order to appropriate the funding. City of San Luis Obispo City Hall 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 www. slocity.org | (805) 781-7100 Local Revenue Measure: $30.2 Million (FY 2023-24) Your City Government at Work The City of San Luis Obispo is Prepared Keeps the City operations running for three months in case of a disaster or unanticipated event CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 2023-2025 FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET IN BRIEF Budget Process Community Outreach Council Goal Setting Budget Development Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1 2 3 4 5 Housing and Homelessness Climate Action, Open Space, and Sustainable Transportation Diversity, Equity, Inclusion (DEI) Economic Resiliency, Cultural Vitality and Fiscal Sustainability MAJOR CITY GOALS In collaboration with local partners, implement initiatives that reinforce a thriving and sustainable Local economy, support a diverse, inclusive, and vibrant community, preserve arts and culture, and ensure fiscal responsibility and sustainable operations Further our commitment to making San Luis Obispo a welcoming and inclusive city for all by continuing to incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion into all programs and policies. Support the expansion of housing options for all, and continue to facilitate the production of housing, including the necessary supporting infrastructure, with an emphasis on affordable and workforce housing as well as accessibly connected development. Collaborate with local non-profit partners, non-governmental agencies, the county, the state, and federal governments to advocate for increased funding and implementation of comprehensive and effective strategies to prevent and reduce homelessness. Proactively address the climate crisis and increase resiliency through the implementation of the Climate Action Plan. Use resources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reach carbon neutrality by 2035, with a focus on the preservation and enhancement of convenient and equitable alternative and sustainable transportation, the preservation of open space, and equitable access to parks and open space. Where do your tax dollars and fee payments go? The City of San Luis Obispo is a full service City and the General Fund budget goes towards providing essential services to the public. The total General Fund budgeted expenditures are approximately $121 million in FY 2023- 24 and $117 million in FY 2024-25. The FY 2023-24 budget is displayed below (in thousands). The total expenditure budget exceeds the revenue budget because some one-time expenditures are paid for using the prior year's fund balance. $120,817 Like most municipalities in California, various tax revenues provide the largest source of revenue for the General Fund, financing most general government services. User fees, grants, and miscellaneous revenue make up the remainder of the revenue budget. The total General Fund projected revenues are approximately $116 million in FY 2023-24 and $119 million in FY 2024-25. The FY 2023-24 budget is displayed at the right. Sales & Use Tax, $53.3 M Property Tax, $22.0 M Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), $10.7 M Other Tax & Franchise Revenue, $11.9 M Fees and Other Revenue, $14.0 M Storm Reimbursement (Estimate), $4.2 M Contact Information Erica A.Stewart...............................Mayor Jan Marx.................................Vice Mayor Emily Francis..................Council Member Michelle Shoresman.......Council Member Andy Pease....................Council Member City Manager: Derek Johnson Finance Director: Emily Jackson Principal Budget Analyst: Natalie Harnett City Council The Local Revenue Measure – also known as Measure G20 – is a one- and-a-half percent local sales tax. It protects and maintains essential services and facilities, such as open space preservation, bike lanes and sidewalks, public safety, neighborhood street paving and code enforcement, flood protection, senior programs, and other vital services and capital improvement projects. MAINTAIN* *The City's Police Department provides more than traditional public safety services associated with sworn patrol officers. It also provides homelessness services, downtown services, a school resource officer, and pro-active outreach efforts. In fact, over 25% of the department's staffing costs are for civilian (or non-sworn) staff. The City is prepared for economic downturns or other unanticipated costs with its reserves including: General Fund Reserve $11.6 Million Capital Reserve $4 Million Revenue Stabilization Reserve $2 Million CalPERS 115 Trust Fund $2 Million Risk Management Reserve $1 Million Repairs and maintains City-owned assets if no other funds are available Helps protect the City from variety of risks Supports contribution to CalPERS and ensures the City is able to make its required unfunded liability payments Keeps the City nimble in case of a potential economic downturn View the full 2023-25 Financial Plan at: www.slocity.org *Based on 2021-22 data Page 67 of 69 2023-25 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)Enterprise Funds 1 2 3 8 6 5 4 7 1 2 3 1 2 3 5 4 1 2 1 2 TRANSIT UTILITIES Bus Replacement with Electric Vehicles Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure 1. 2. WRRF/Wastewater Collection Maintenance Facility Waterline: Johnson - Iris to Bishop WTP Building Maintenance Water Storage Tank Maintenance Sewer-main: Taft, Hathaway, Phillips, Buena Vista, Loomis 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. COMMUNITY Mission Plaza Concept Plan Development Parks Orcutt Area 1. 2. TO VIEW THE CITY'S INTERACTIVE GIS MAP OF ACTIVE PROJECTS, VISIT SLOCITY.ORG OR SCAN HERE! Storm Recovery WATER FUND SEWER FUND PARKING FUND TRANSIT FUND WATER TREATMENT PLANT (WTP) 2023-25 Major Projects IINFRASTRUCTURE & TRANSPORTATION PARKING 03 Cultural Arts District Parking Structure Parking Structure Maintenance Gateless Equipment 1. 2. 3. 2023 Arterial Roads (various locations) Storm Response Prado Road Interchange California Taft Roundabout Mid-Higuera Bypass ATP - Higuera Complete Street ATP - Railroad Safety Trail ATP - South/King Crossing 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Enterprise Funds, often referred to as "Business Activities" are distinguished from governmental funds by their similarity to private sector enterprises and are financed solely through user charges. The City's four largest enterprise funds and their operating budgets are: Expenditures 2023-24: $32.0 Million 2024-25: $31.6 Million Expenditures 2023-24: $23.0 Million 2024-25: $23.8 Million Expenditures 2023-24: $57.7 Million 2024-25: $10.2 Million Expenditures 2023-24: $10.3 Million 2024-25: $9.6 Million The City experienced multiple storms during the first few months of the 2023 calendar year and while initial damage assessments have been done, the number and scope of the repairs continues to evolve as staff is able to access impacted areas to fully assess the extent of the damage. The overarching strategy for the 2023-25 Financial Plan is to prioritize storm recovery and prepare for future storm events. Several emergency repair projects are already underway and some will begin in FY 2023-24 or FY 2024-25. The CIP and its annual implementation of projects is one of the primary functions of local government. The CIP enables the City to plan, schedule, and finance capital projects to ensure cost effectiveness and conformance with established plans and policies. Through its adopted CIP, the City meets community needs by providing the infrastructure required for economic vitality, neighborhood wellness, housing, transportation, sustainability, active and passive recreation, public safety, cleanliness, and other basic amenities. The map below highlights major upcoming projects and includes the status of projects currently in progress (as of June 2023). FY 2023-24: $116 Million* FY 2024-25: $67 Million Total CIP Budget (All funding sources combined) Revenue 2023-24: $28.2 Million 2024-25: $28.6 Million Revenue 2023-24: $52.6 Million 2024-25: $20.8 Million Revenue 2023-24: $56.5 Million 2024-25: $10.4 Million Revenue 2023-24: $11.8 Million 2024-25: $11.9 Million *Higher than FY 2024-25 due to construction of Cultural Arts District Parking Structure ANNUAL ASSET MAINTENANCE ASSET REPLACEMENT NEW ASSETS Page 68 of 69 Tier 1 Network Project Implementation List No.Project 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 1 RRST (Taft to Pepper)In Construction 2 Anholm Greenway 3 Higuera & Marsh (East of Santa Rosa & west of Nipomo)X 4 Higuera & Marsh (Nipomo to Santa Rosa)X 5 S. Higuera (Marsh to Madonna)X 7 S. Higuera (Madonna to Margarita) 8 S. Higuera (Margarita to Prado) 9 S. Higuera (Prado to Southern Limits) 6 Madonna/S. Higuera Intersection Improvements X 10 Madonna (US 101 Ramps to Higuera)X 11 Madonna (Shared-Use Path from US 101 to Oceanaire)X Complete 12 Oceanaire Greenway (North of Madonna)X In final design. Construction begins Summer 2022 13 Oceanaire Greenway (South of Madonna)In final design. Construction begins Summer 2022 14 Froom Ranch Way (Shared-Use Path from LOVR to Dalidio/Prado)X Complete 15 Prado/Dalidio (Madonna to Froom)X Complete 16 Morro Greenway (Marsh to Mill)X In final design. Construction begins Summer 2022 17 RRST (Tiburon to Orcutt) - Bullock Ranch X Dependent on Developer 18 Santa Barbara (Upham to Broad)X In design 32 Foothill Blvd (Western City Limit to Santa Rosa) 33 Foothill/Santa Rosa Intersection Improvements (Caltrans) 34 Foothill Blvd (Santa Rosa to California) 24 Broad Street (South to Orcutt) 31 California (Marsh to SLO High School)Focused SRTS Plan for SLO High should come first to guide improvements 25 Broad Street (Orcutt to Tank Farm) 26 Broad Street (Tank Farm to Farmhouse) 36 Madonna/Oceanaire Crossing Improvements Significant reconfiguration of complex intersection 29 Prado (Higuera to Serra Meadows)X 27 Prado (Froom to SLO Creek) - Prado I/C Construction date shown as year of completion 22 Tank Farm (Higuera to County Line & County Line to Orcutt)X 23 Tank Farm (Shared-Use Path from Innovation Wy to Santa Fe)600 Tank Farm required to significant design/planning 35 South Street (Broad to Higuera) 37 Tank Farm/Broad Protected Intersection 30 Prado (Serra Meadows to Broad Street)Dependent on Prado Road Extension TIER 1 BIKEWAYS RANKED BY RIDERSHIP POTENTIAL I 40% C 36% G 26% E 20% B 19% H 17% D 17% A 11% F 11% Coordinate w/ Paving Project Projects with a start of construction date in black are already budget programmed except for the S. Higuera project which is a potential mid-budget request item. Projects with a start of construction date in gray are not yet budget programmed. START OF CONSTRUCTION NotesDeveloper Project In final design. Construction begins Summer 2022 In design. Currently searching for construction grants In early design Item 3, Attachment 5, Page 1 of 1 Note: this list was prioritized by the ATC on 9/16/21 given the pavement schedule available at the time. Since then,the pavement schedule has been updated and some pavement project timelines have changed. Given these changes, staff will bring this list back to the ATC in early 2025 for input. Page 69 of 69