Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4800-4817
n RESOLUTION NO. 4817 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLD A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY USE PERMIT REQUEST TO CONVERT STORAGE SPACE TO TWO MOBILE HOME SPACES IN SILVER CITY MOBILE LODGE AT 3860 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo considered the appeal by the applicant and conducted a public hearing`on the matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the request would remove a needed convenience for the mobile home park tenants who do not have room at each individual space to store large items like boats, campers and recreation vehicles; and WHEREAS, the council determined that the most recent mobile home park established in the city was required to provide a common outdoor storage facility; and WHEREAS the council concludes that the requested use is not appropriate at the proposed site for protection of public health, safety and welfare of persons living in the mobile home park. NOW.THEREFORE *the council resolves to deny the applicant's appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's denial based on the following findings: 1. The proposed project will be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of persons living or working in the mobile home park in that there will not be convenient storage on site for large items such as recreational vehicles, campers, and boats that: "cannot be 'stored on individual mobile home spaces due to the small size'of these spaces. 2. The proposed project is not appropriate at the proposed location inithat a.needed outdoor storage area within the park would be eliminated. On motion of Councilman Griffin seconded by 'Councilman Settle , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: Councilman Dunin .ABSENT: None R. 4817 • Resolution No. 4F' i (1982 Series) Page 2 the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted the 4th day of " May , 1982. ATTEST: v City Clerk Pamela Vo s APPROVED: Ca�� Q :;r�r� — Administrative Offic'eif City Attorney Tnteriti lComoiflity Development Coordinator ODD RESOLUTION NO. 4816 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DENYING API APPEAL AND UPHOLD A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR COIN- OPERATED GAMES AND BILLIARD FACILITY IN EXIST- ING SERVICE STATION AT 1590 LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo considered the Appeal by the applicant and conducted.a public hearing on the matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the requested use would cater to minors and increase bicycle activity within the service station site and adjacent parking lot and subject bicyclists and pedestrians from adjacent parking lot to undue hazards because of the poor design of the parking lot and points of access allowing random traffic movement within the vicinity; and WHEREAS, the council determined that using a service station for an assembly -type use would unnecessarily subject people to potential fire hazards; and WHEREAS, the council concludes that the requested use is not appropriate at the proposed site for protection of public health, safety and welfare of persons that might use the facility. NOW, THEREFORE, the council resolves to deny the applicant's appeal and uphold the Planning Commission denial for use of this location, based on the following findings: 1. The proposed use is not appropriate at the proposed location because it would subject pedestrians and bicyclists to hazards within a poorly designed parking lot and is not compatible with a service station use. 2. The proposed use may be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of persons in that the combination of an assembly use and gasoline service station operations may expose persons to unnecessary hazards. On motion of Councilman Settle and on the following roll call vote: seconded by Councilwoman Dovey AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None R 4816 the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 4th day of May , 1982. i Melanie C. Billig ATTEST: z V, at�, City Cler Pamela Voges APPROVED: Q,,7A A _,a Q 422�� /I City Administrative Officer City Attorney Inter' C nity Development Coordinator r i 4p 0011 COD RESOLUTION NO. 4815 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO. WHEREAS., the State of California, through its,Department of Transportation has presented an Agreement for maintenance of the State Highways in the City of San Luis Obispo, effective as of and to remain in effect until amended or terminated;'and WHEREAS, the City Council has read said Agreement in full and is familiar with the contents thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that said Agreement for Maintenance of the State Highways in the City is hereby approved and the Mayor and the City Clerk are directed to sign the same on behalf of said City. On motion of Councilman Settle seconded by Councilman Dunin and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 4th day of May 1982. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PARELA OVGES C. R 4815 - 2 - Resolution.No. 4815 Re: Maintenance Agreement APPROVED: . Pto 4" . City Administrative Officer :ity Attorney Public Services Director 1982 Series �—� Ye �orr��ro j AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed in duplicate this 4th day of May , 19 82 , by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "the STATE" and the CITY of SAN LUIS OBISPO hereinafter referred to as "CITY ". W I T N E S S E T H: A. RECITALS: The Parties desire to provide for the CITY to perform particular maintenance functions on the State highway within the CITY as provided in Section 130 of the Streets and Highway code.. B. AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall supersede any.previous AGREEMENT for MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO and /or AMENDMENTS thereto with the CITY. In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, it is agreed: The CITY will perform such maintenance work as is specifically delegated to it, on the State highway routes or portions hereof all as hereinafter described under Sections I and J hereof or as said sections may be subsequently modified with the-consent of the parties hereto acting by and through their authorized representative. C. MAINTENANCE DEFINED: Maintenance is defined in Section 27 of the Streets and Highways Code as follows: Sec. 27. "(a) The preservation and keeping of rights of way, and each type of roadway, structure, safety convenience . or device, planting, illumination equipment and other facility, in the safe and usable condition to which it has been improved or constructed, but does not include reconstruction, or other improve- ment. "(b) Operation of special safety conveniences and devices, and illuminating equipment. "(c) The special or emergency maintenance or_repa.ir necessitated by accidents or by storms or other weather conditions, slides, settlements or other unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway, structure or facility." D. DEGREE OF MAINTENANCE: The degree or extent of maintenance work to be performed and the standards therefore shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of the Streets and Highways,Code and the provisions of this Agreement as hereinafter specified or as may be prescribed from time to time by the District Director. "District Director ", as used herein, means the District Director of the Department of Transportation assigned to the territory in which the CITY is located, or his authorized representative. A guide to the proper degree of maintenance in specific programs i.s set forth in the cur -rent edition of the State Maintenance Manual, a copy of which has been provided to the CITY. The level of service of maintenance in each of the programs delegated to the CITY has been considered in setting authorized total_ and route dollar amounts. The CITY may perform additional work if desired by the STATE but the STATE will not reimburse the CITY for any work in excess of authorized dollars. The District Director may authorize adjustments needed because of inflation or changes in program emphasis. E. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this contract or affect the legal liability of either party to the contract by imposing any standard of care respecting the maintenance of State Highways different from the standard of care imposed by law. It is understood and agreed that neither STATE, nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this Agreement for Maintenance. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4 CITY shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims suits or actions of every-name, kind and description brought for or in account of injuries to or death of any person or damage to property resulting from anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this Agreement except as otherwise provided by Statute. The CITY waives any and all rights to any type of express and implied indemnity against the STATE, its officers or employees. It is the intent of the parties that the CITY will indemnify and hold harmless the STATE, its officers or employees from any and all claims, suits or actions as set forth above regardless of the existence or degree of fault or negligence, whether active or passive, primary or secondary, on the part of the STATE. F. MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS: Certain maintenance functions may be delegated to the CITY as indicated under Section J of this Agreement. The CITY shall not perform any of these maintenance functions unless specifically delegated under said Section J (DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE). The various maintenance functions or duties are defined and described by the following programs. The numbers without prefix relate to the Maintenance Management System.(MMS) Program and the numbers with the prefix HM relate to Caltrans budgetary codes. *01 and *02 - FLEXIBLE AND RIGID ROAD MAINTENANCE PROGRAM HM =11 HM -12 This covers the maintenance required for the restoration and repair of both the surface and base within the roadbed area. Roadbed means all surface and subsurface structures of the traveled way, parking banks and shoulders. *03 = ROADSIDE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM HM -21 Roadside shall be described as that area between the roadbed and the outer highway right of way boundary line. Maintenance of roadside includes the cleaning of culverts, ditches, natural water channels and gutters, "restoring side slopes, removal of drifted material, drift prevention, erosion control work, and maintenance of walls, cribs or bank protection facilities, curbs and side- walks, and other roadside facilities. Maintenance work to be performed within the area designated as roadside maintenance shall include such sidewalk and curb inspection and action toward repair of sidewalks, curbs and other facilities as is necessary to keep them in a reasonably safe condition. Joint inspection should be on a biannual basis. The STATE, will not pay for maintenance of any sidewalks. The CITY shall follow the same policy and procedures generally followed by it.with respect to CITY streets in the matter of requiring sidewalk repairs and control of vegetation to be made by or at the expense of abutting owners who are under legal obligation to perform such work. It is agreed that reasonable diligence will be exercised by the CITY in performance of required sidewalk repair and control of vegetation as outlined in this portion of the agreement. t I *04 - ROADWAY LITTER AND DEBRIS PROGRAM HM-22 This program includes all work concerning roadbed and roadside cleanup operations to insure that the highway presents a neat, clean and attractive appearance. Sweeping and cleaning shall be dirt or litter normally coming onto of traffic or from natural causes. pay_ for picking up or disposing of or otherwise placed on the highway extent of sweeping and cleaning on be greater than customarily done on limited to the removal of the roadbed from the action STATE will not undertake nor rubbish or debris swept into from abutting property. The the State highways shall not comparable CITY streets. The sweeping activities covered in this program pertain to the sweeping of paved medians, curbed CITY street sections and curbed or rolled gutter types on other highways. *05 - VEGETATION CONTROL PROGRAM HM -23 Vegetation control refers to the maintenance treatment of all vegetative material growing native within the non - landscaped highway rights of way. Included is treatment by chemical means and cutting and trimming by hand and mechanical means. Vegetation includes brush control and tree trimming. Routine tree maintenance shall include care necessary to maintain trees in a healthy growing condition. Tree trimming shall be limited to the occasional removal of dead or low over- hanging limbs. Extensive tree reconditioning work, spraying or removal are not routine maintenance operations and will not be paid for unless such work is specifically authorized by the STATE. The above, when delegated to the CITY, shall not be construed as restricting, prohibiting or otherwise relieving the CITY of the responsibilities for inspection and upkeep of trees . in a manner that will insure maximum safety to both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The STATE will not pay for maintenance of landscaping or trees which the CITY planted or which were planted under authorization of any encroachment permit and the CITY is responsible for maintenance. *06 - PAVEMENT DELINEATION PROGRAM HM -41 The pavement delineation program involves all work necessary to maintain distinctive roadway markings on the traveled way. This includes, but not limited to layout, removal, cleaning and /or replacement of existing delineation and roadway markings. All work shall conform to the Standards established by the STATE. Except for the red "No Parking" zones at the approach to and exit from intersections controlled by traffic signals, the STATE will not pay curb painting or parking lines as may otherwise be required for the regulation of parking.. The cost of maintaining pedestrian crosswalks at intersections shall be shared between the STATE and CITY in the same ratio as the number of intersecting roads or streets under jurisdiction of the respective agencies bears to the total number of intersecting CITY street, STATE highways and COUNTY roads within the particular intersections; for example, a 50 -50 basis will apply to the regular cross street intersection wherein a COUNTY road is not a factor (City only). State reserves the option to check at random all the pavement delineation program maintained by the CITY to assure conformance to the pavement delineation maintenance levels. Failure of the CITY to comply to the pavement delineation maintenance levels should be reason to terminate this agreement as specified under Section L, "Term of Agreement ". *07 - SIGN PROGRAM HM -42 The sign program includes all maintenance work performed on signs placed or to be placed, on STATE highways for the purpose of warning, or regulating traffic. The work consists of replace- ment of existing signs and the repair, cleaning and painting of .. these signs. Upgrading of existing signs or installation of new signs is not a part of this program. All signs shall conform to the specifications adopted by the STATE, or as otherwise specifically authorized by the STATE. Positioning of such signs shall conform to standards adopted by the STATE. Unless specifically authorized, the State will.not maintain or pay for maintenance of regulatory signs installed for the purpose of stopping vehicular traffic at pedestrian or school crossings nor the regulatory signs installed for the prohibition or the regulation of parking. *08 - ELECTRICAL PROGRAM - NOT DELEGATED HM -43 This program includes all state operation and maintenance work performed on highway electrical facilities used to control flashing beacons, traffic signals and traffic signal systems, and safety lighting. STATE will not pay for the maintenance, installation, repair, servicing, nor power for ordinary street lighting; however, lighting at intersections, which qualifies as safety lighting under warrants approved /accepted by the STATE, will be paid for when approved and specifically authorized by the District Director. Where such lighting has been specifically authorized at an inter- section, the maintenance and operating costs thereof shall be shared between the STATE and the CITY on a prorata basis in the same ratio as the number of legs in the intersection under each jurisdiction bears to the total number of legs. The CITY will furnish service for or perform such maintenance work as specifically delegated to it in other sections of this agreement, and the STATE will furnish service for or perform the work not otherwise assigned to the CITY. It is agreed that monthly billings, applicable to the inter= section involved, shall be established-for the operation and main- tenance of the traffic signals and other electrically operated traffic control devices based on actual cost. Estimated monthly billings based on a cost per units shall apply for all other elec- trically operated devices. These billings shall include overhead and other indirect expenses incurred by the STATE in these specific operations. The cost of operating and maintaining traffic signals or other electrically operated traffic control devices now in place at the intersection of any STATE highway route and any CITY street identified in Exhibit "A" shall be shared between the STATE and the CITY on a.prorata basis in the same ratio as the number of legs in the intersection under each jurisdiction bears to the total number of legs. The same principle of cost distri- bution shall apply to freeway interchanges. The participation ratio shall be based on the ratio of the number of legs of the respective agencies to the total number of .legs of the interchange. The percentage of costs to be borne by the STATE and CITY shall be shown on Exhibit "A ". The STATE will submit monthly bills for operation and routine maintenance as defined above. Bills shall be in accordance with that shown on Exhibit "A" and as subsequently modified in accor- dance with Section G. (GENERAL GUIDES) Extraordinary expense, such as for repair or replacement of extensive damage, shall be assessed directly against the particular installation involved. Billings for such costs shall be itemized as to materials, including service and expense, salaries and wages, and equipment rental. EXHIBIT "A" Effective ELECTRICAL FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Billed and Maintained by the STATE Type of Cost Distribution Route Location Facility Units State City SIGNALS 001 Walnut Traffic Act. 001 Olive it 001 Murray it 001 Foothill It 001 Highland Dr. " 101 Madonna Rd. SB " 11 11 NB iJ 227 Orcutt " it South & " 1/2 Santa Barbara 1/2 " Buchon " " Pismo " " * *Marsh Fixed Time " * *Higuera " " * *Marsh & " Nipomo " * *Higuera & " Nipomo Marsh & Traffic Act. Higuera FLASHERS None 1 1/2 1/2 1 3/4 1/4 1 1/2 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 *3/4 1/4 1 1/4 3/4 1 1/2 1/2 1 2/3 1/3 1 1/2 1/2 1 �1/2 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 3/4 1/4 1 1/2 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 3/4 1/4 * See Interagency Agreement W /Cal Poly ** Maintained by City LIGHTS l �J Cost Distribution Units State Type of Route Location Facility 001 Walnut 250w HPS " Olive 400w MV " Murray 400w MV " Foothill 700w HPS " Highland 700w MV 101 Los Osos 400w MV 1/2 Road 1 0 It it 400w MV " Madonna 400w MV 1/2 Road 6 3/4 is " 400w MV " of 400w MV " Buena 400w MV 1/3 Vista Capitolio Way 70w HPS " " 400w MV 227 Orcutt Rd. 400w MV " South & 400w MV 1 Santa Barbara 1/3 " Marsh & 400w MV 2/3 Higuera If Humbert- Mitchell" LIGHTS l �J Cost Distribution Units State City 2 1/2 1/2 2 3/4 1/4 2 1/2 1/2. 4 1/2 1/2 4 * *3/4 1/4 2 1/2 1/2 1 2/3 1/3 4 1/4 3/4 3 0 1 2 1/2 1/2 1 0 1 1 1/3 2/3 3 2/3 1/3 4 1/2 1/2 6 3/4 1/4 ,**See Interagency Agreement w /Cal Poly UTILITY OWNED - BILLED BY THE CITY Type of Cost Distribution Route Location Facility Units State City 001 Santa Rosa & 200w HPS 1 1/2 1/2 Walnut 001 Osos & Walnut It 1 1/2 1/2 001 Osos & Olive 1 1 0 001 Montalban 1 1/2 1/2 001 Oak 1 1/2 1/2 001 Meinecke 1 2/3 1/3 001 Boysen 1 2/3 1/3 227 Capitolio Way 70w HPS 1 2/3 1/3 227 Rockview P1. 70w HPS 1 2/3 1/3 it Perkins It 1 2/3 1/3 if Lawrence is 1 2/3 1/3 If Humbert- Mitchell" 1 1/2 1/2 If Francis " 1 2/3 1/3 It Caudill It 1 1/2 1/2 UTILITY OWNED- BILLED BY THE CITY (Continued) Type of Cost Distribution Route Location Facility Units State City 227 Woodbridge 70w HPS 1 1/2 1/2 It Funston " 1 2/3 1/3 " Branch " 1 2/3 1/3 it Chorro 1 1/2 1/2 to High it 1 1/2 1/2 , " Upham of 1 1/2 1/2 " Church 100w HPS 1 1/2 1/2 to Leff it 1 1/2 1/2 to Islay it 1 1/2 1/2 " Buchon To 1 1/2 1/2 " Pismo if 1 1/2 1/2 " Pacific of 1 1/2 1/2 " Marsh 200w HPS 1 3/4 1/4 Higuera it 2 1/2 1/2 " Nipomo & 1 1/2 1/2 Higuera " Carmel & 1 2/3 1/3 Higuera It Nipomo & " 1 1/2 1/2 Marsh to Beach & Marsh " 1 1/2 1/2 to Carmel & Marsh " 1 1/2 1/2 *08 - ELECTRICAL PROGRAM - DELEGATED HM -43 This program includes all maintenance work performed on highway electrical facilities used to control flashing beacons, traffic signals and traffic signal systems, provide safety and sign lighting. STATE will not pay for the maintenance, installation, repair, servicing, nor power for ordinary street lighting; however, light- ing at intersections, which qualifies as safety lighting under warrants approved /accepted by the STATE, will be paid for when approved and specifically authorized by the District Director. Where such lighting has been specifically authorized at an intersection, the maintenance and operating costs thereof shall be shared between the STATE and the CITY on a pro -rata basis in the same ratio as the number of legs in the intersection under each jurisdiction bears to the total number of legs. The cost of maintaining and operating traffic signals or other electrically operated traffic control devices now in place or those which may hereafter be installed at the intersection of any STATE highway route and any CITY street /road shall be shared between the STATE and the CITY on a pro -rata basis in the same ratio as the number of legs in the intersection under each jurisdiction bears to the total number of legs. The same principle of cost distribution shall apply to freeway interchanges. The Participation ratio shall be based on the ratio of the number of legs of the respective agencies to the total number of legs of the interchange. Timing of traffic signals shall be the responsibility of the STATE. Timing shall be determined after consultation with the local agency; however, the decision of the District Director of Transportation shall be final. Maintenance of the "designed" timing is the responsibility of the CITY. Timing records shall be kept in both the STATE and CITY maintenance and traffic branches. NOTE: Cost of electrical energy charges will be charged separately. EMERGENCY OPERATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS DURING EQUIPMENT FAILURE A written "Contingency Plan" for operation of traffic signals should be prepared for emergency operation of each signalized intersection. Copies of the plan shall be kept in the controller cabinet and in the Maintenance and Traffic Branches of STATE and CITY. a. The plan shall be prepared by the STATE with the concurrence of the CITY. b. The plan shall detail the method of restoring a malfunctioning traffic signal to service as follows: (1) Place the signals in the flashing mode of operation. (2) Replace defective units. (3) If direct replacement of defective units cannot be made immediately, place the signals under control of an emergency replacement controller. C. The operation shall be considered as the "primary emergency mode of operation at all intersections ". The plan shall specify the color each phase will display during flashing operation. Red /Yellow or all red may be used. d. The plan shall specify the timing of each interval of an emergency replacement controller. e.. The "Contingency Plan" for an at any time to meet changing procedure above. intersection may be changed conditions following the f. Documentation of the engineering reasons for selecting a particular plan for a specific location shall be kept on file in the STATE and CITY Branches. The goal shall be to provide the safest emergency mode of operation. The same plan may be applicable for a large number of inter- sections. Every effort shall be made to restore the-operation of the intersection to normal operation as soon as possible. STANDARDS FOR DELEGATED ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE The level of maintenance work to be performed on highway electrical facilities is listed below. These levels become the "Degree of Maintenance" specified or prescribed under Section D of this Agreement. Damaged or malfunctioning electrical installations which seriously affect public safety or capital investment should be promptly repaired or temporary corrections made until permanent repairs can be scheduled. Repair of inoperative or damaged electrical installations which do not seriously affect public safety should be coordinated with routine maintenance operations. A routine surveillance of electrical facilities shall be made in an effort to observe and correct potential deficiencies before serious problems develop., To insure a minimum standard of operation, highway lighting, sign illumination, and flashing beacons shall be routinely inspected during hours of darkness, Important illuminated signs, require prompt attention on notification of a blackout or extensive burnout. Signals A detailed check for proper operation, including inspection and necessary replacement of auxiliary equipment such as relays, contactors, etc., shall be made at intervals of approximately 30 (thirty) days. Fixed -time electro- mechanical controllers shall be overhauled approximately once a year. Traffic- actuated, electro- mechanical controller units shall be overhauled in the shop approximately once every year. Traffic signal lamps shall be group replaced on a planned schedule based on rated lamp life. All signal maintenance inspections or repairs shall be logged and records maintained in the control cabinet. Signal standards and control cabinets shall be maintained in a presentable manner-. Flashing Beacons Flashing beacons shall be routinely inspected for proper operation approximately once every 6 (six) months. Electro - mechanical flasher mechanisms shall be removed, cleaned and adjusted and excessively worn parts replaced, approximately once a year. Flashing beacons shall be relamped on the same schedule as outlined above for traffic signal lamps. Highway Lighting and Sign Illumination Luminaires and fixtures for illuminated signs shall be inspected and cleaned in conjunction with scheduled relamping; more frequent cleaning should be performed when required. Lamps shall be replaced on a planned schedule based on the rated life of the lamps currently in use. The State reserves the option to check at random all traffic signals maintained by the CITY on STATE highways to assure con- formance to the electrical maintenance levels. Failure of the CITY to comply to the electrical maintenance levels would be reason to terminate this Agreement as specified under Section L, "Term of Agreement ". J Re- delegation of traffic signal maintenance to third parties shall be done only upon specific written approval of the District Director of Transportation. Such re- delegated work shall be per- formed to the same levels of service as spelled out herein and will be subject to the same random checks as provided for work performed directly by CITY forces. If the District Director of Transportation determines the third party is failing to comply with the specified .levels, the CITY shall, within 30 days of notice, terminate the third party agreement and resume maintenance by CITY forces or terminate this agreement as specified under Section L, "Term of Agreement ". *09 - TRAFFIC SAFETY DEVICES PROGRAM HM -44 Work performed under this program includes replacement of guide posts or markers; and the repair, replacement, cleaning and /or painting of guard rails. Also included are the repair of median barrier cable, chain link fence, and portland cement con- crete walls; the repair and maintenance of energy dissipators such as water type bumpers, sand traps or other devices installed for the purpose of absorbing vehicle energy. Energy dissipators (crash cushions) must be repaired within 48 hours after being hit. The CITY shall maintain sufficient inventory of the necessary parts approved by the STATE needed to accomplish the repairs within this time limit. Sand, used to fill certain types of energy dissipators, shall meet STATE require ments. *12 - LANDSCAPE PROGRAM HM -25 This program refers to the treatment, maintenance and replace- ment of all vegetative material planted within the landscaped STATE highway right of way. Work includes watering, pruning, fertilizing, plant replacement, weed control by hand and mechanical means, tree trimming and /or removal, chipping and miscellaneous work such as pest control and inhibitor spray. Repairs to the electric portion of automatic controls is covered in this 12- Land - scape Program. NOTE: There are several activities that are duplicated in the 05 Vegetation Control Program; for this reason, care should be exercised when reporting, that the proper program is cited. The STATE will only pay for the maintenance of landscaped areas, ornamental plantings of trees installed by the STATE at STATE expense or other areas specifically designated by the District Director. *13 - BRIDGE AND PUMP MAINTENANCE PROGRAM HM -31 The Bridge and Pump Maintenance Program includes work performed on all structures which provide for passage of highway traffic over, through or under obstacles and /or qualify for bridge number as assigned by the State Office of Structures. Work under this program consists of structure repair, maintenance, painting and cleaning, electro- mechanical equipment and sump pump maintenance, repair or cleaning, and navigational light repair. Storm inspection of sump pumps is also included in this program. Bridges, as defined above, will be investigated by a repre- sentative of the State's bridge engineering staff once each year and more often, if considered necessary, In addition to such annual investigation, routine maintenance to be performed under pr-ovisions of the Agreement shall include monthly inspection of each bridge by qualified personnel and immediate repair of the minor defects when the cost does not exceed $500. The District Director shall be immediately notified of major defects as are hereinafter defined. Bridge repair work costing in excess of $500 on a single structure shall be considered as being a major repair project. Except in the case of emergency, such major repair projects shall conform to the.methods and procedure to be recommended by the STATE. Major bridge repair is not a routine maintenance operation and will require specific authorization. *15 - PERMITS HM -47 This section provides for the processing and enforcement of transportation permits by the CITY and preliminary engineering, processing and inspection of encroachment permits by the CITY where authorized to perform this work. ENCROACHMENT PERMITS When authority to issue Encroachment Permits is delegated to the CITY by the District the authority shall pertain to all parts of the highway throughout the particular length of streets indicated under. Sections I and J of this Agreement. Permits shall be issued on a form.provided by the STATE and the CITY will furnish a copy of all permits to the STATE. The CITY agrees that all permits issued by CITIES shall be made out in conformance with STATE - authorized encroachment policies and standards. STATE standards of design are to be used, except in. cases where CITY standards, covered by ordinance, are more restrictive than STATE requirements, in which case CITY standards of design will be honored. All STATE policy questions should be referred to the Caltrans District Permit Engineer. Routine minor permits shall be handled by the CITY without STATE prior approval. Routine minor permits consist of: awnings, marquees, canopies, advertising signs, residence driveways, roof drains, concrete sidewalks, temporary construction safety fences, installation or repair of utility service connections behind curb line and maintenance of existing pipeline within STATE right of way area. Except for exempt permits (those that are not subject to payment of fees), the CITY is expected to collect sufficient fees from the permittee to cover its cost of permit.issuance; and no cost shall be billed to.nor borne by the STATE. . No major encroachment permit shall be issued by the CITY unless prior approval by the Caltrans District Permit Engineer is obtained for the permit. Excluding exempt permits Caltrans will bill the CITY for such review and any subsequent inspection deemed necessary by Caltrans. Caltrans' billing will be in accordance with the Caltrans fee schedule. .Excluding exempt permits, the CITY is expected to collect sufficient fees from the permittee to cover Caltrans' bill and any other costs incurred by the CITY. No costs for CITY administration, review or inspection shall be billed to nor borne by the STATE. Major encroachments include, but are not limited to all other work not included under routine permits such as: 1. Banners - Special Non - profit Events. 2.. Bus Stops. 3. Christmas Decorations within Right of Way. 4. Commercial Driveways. 5. Curb and Gutter. 6. Curb Zones - Parking Restrictions. 7. Drainage from Private Property, other than Roof Drains. 8. Drainage Structure Extensions, Replacements, etc. 9. Electrolysis Test Stations or Anode Beds. 10. Fences. 11. Flashing Signs. 12. Landscaping - Planting, Maintenance, Removal. 13. Median openings. 14. Memorial Markers - Historical and Recreational sites. 15. Motion Picture Photography within Highway Right of Way. 16. Parades and Public Gatherings on Highway Right of Way. J 17. School Signs, Safety Devices, and Crossings. 18. Seismograph Work within Right of Way. 19. Street Connections. 20. Striping - Lanes, X- walks, Detours. 21. Traffic Signals Flashing Beacons and Street Lighting - Installation, modification. 22. Utility and other Substructures - except service connections back of curb. 23. Utility Poles, Anchors, and Aerial Cable. 24. Work in existing manholes requiring closure of traffic lanes. Authority to issue encroachment permits for the following items is not delegated to the CITY and the request for an encroachment permit shall be submitted to the Caltrans District. Permit Engineer. 1. Any Work within limits of State Highway Contract. 2. Cooperative. Agreement Projects. 3. County Flood Control Projects. 4. Prehistoric Artifacts - Excavation, Salvage, etc. 5. Property on the National Register, State or local inventory. 6. Railroad Grade Xings - Repairs, Construction. 7. Any encroachment requiring additional or revised easements or other Right of Way documents. Qualified CITY personnel shall be assigned for the review, construction and final acceptance of both MINOR and MAJOR encroachment permits issued by the CITY. The STATE will perform cursory inspection of all CITY written STATE highway permits and the STATE assigned field engineer shall be notified as required under the terms of all major encroachment permits. The CITY will furnish a copy of all permits issued on State highways to Caltrans immediately upon issuance. Failure to do so may result in loss of permit- writing authority. In addition, the CITY will set up a file for permits issued on State highways that Caltrans can monitor on a periodic basis. J Upon satisfactory completion of the work authorized under any CITY administered State Highway Permit, the CITY must send a completion notice to the STATE including As -Built Plans. Where there is a discrepancy between the permit plans and the as -built plans and where the encroachment is an underground utility it is of particular importance to have this information to plot on the State's Utility Maps. TRANSPORTATION PERMITS Transportation permits will be required and their loads which exceed the limitations Division 15 of the California Vehicle Code. to issue Transportation Permits is delegated authority shall pertain only to travel that terminates within their corporate limits and to through haul transportation. for all vehicles specified under Where authority to the CITY such Driginates and it shall not apply In issuing such permits, the CITY shall follow the policies and regulations established by the STATE for the issuance of transportation permits as set forth in the State's Maintenance Manual in effect at the time such permits are issued, including specifically, limitations upon the crossing of structures. All STATE policy questions should be referred to the Caltrans District Permit Engineer. *16 - OPERATIONS PROGRAM HM -46 This program includes electrical energy required.to energize overhead lights, signals and other electrical facilities. G. GENERAL GUIDES: Maintenance of warning and regulatory signs, traffic control devices, and highway lighting facilities as hereinbefore referred shall include upkeep and repair of the supports, as well as such other items which are an integral part of the installation. Those facilities as defined under programs 06, 07, 08 and 09 above, which are installed subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, shall become subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement upon notice to the CITY,from the STATE of the completion of any such installation. H. EXPENDITURE AUTHORIZATION: The STATE will reimburse the CITY for actual cost of all routine maintenance work performed by CITY as delegated under Section J of this Agreement, but it is agreed that during any fiscal year, the maximum expenditure on any route shall not exceed the amount as shown on Section I of this Agreement, unless such expenditure is revised by an amended Agreement or otherwise adjusted or modified as hereinafter provided for. A new "ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURES" sheet (Section I) will be provided annually by the STATE for the ensuing fiscal year if necessary to insure equitable annual cost. The expenditure per route for routine maintenance work as referred to above may be increased or decreased, redistributed between routes, or additional expenditures for specific projects costing $5,000 or less may be made when.such adjustment of ex- penditures for routine maintenance or such specific work is authorized in writing by the District Director- or his authorized representative. Expenditures for specific projects costing in excess of the above amount may be made when such specific work is authorized in writing by the District Director with prior approval from the Chief, Office of Highway Maintenance at Headquarters. Additional expenditures or adjustment of ex- penditures thus authorized shall apply during the - fiscal year designated therein and shall not be deemed to permanently modify or change the basic maximum expenditure per route as hereinafter specified. An adjustment of the said maximum ex- penditure, either increase or decrease, shall not affect other terms of the Agreement. I. ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURES ANNUAL MAXIMUM ROUTE LENGTH EXPENDITURE NO. MILES DESCRIPTION OF ROUTING AUTHORIZED 001 1.22 Santa Rosa Street from Walnut $5,400.00 Street to the north city limit at PM 17.73, approximately 0.96 mile. Also - Walnut Street from Santa Rosa Street to Osos Street, approxi- mately 0.09 mile; Olive Street from Santa Rosa Street to Osos Street, approximately 0.09 mile; and Osos Street from Walnut Street to freeway ramps and from Olive Street to freeway ramps, approxi- mately 0.08 mile. A total length of approximately 1.22 miles. 101 6.86 Freeway from south city limit at -0- Post Mile 25.00 to north city limit near Cuesta Park, Post Mile 31.86, a total length of approxi- mately 6.86 miles. 227 2.68 South Broad Street from city 12,000.00 limits, Post Mile 11.56 to Higuera Street, Post Mile 13.44, approximately 1.89 miles. Also - Higuera Street westbound from Broad Street to the intersection of Marsh Street and Higuera Street, approximately 0.41 mile. Also - Marsh Street eastbound from the intersection of Higuera Street and Marsh Street to Broad Street, approximately 0.38 mile. A total length of approximately 2.68 miles. TOTAL AUTHORIZED EXPEND. $17,400.00 �J J. DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE The specific maintenance activity indicated below is hereby delegated to the CITY. This delegation of maintenance activity set forth herein does not include areas and functions of which the control and maintenance rest with the local authority under the terms of Freeway Agreements and /or Freeway Maintenance Agree- ments. Caltrans Budgeting Codes (HM) Maintenance Management Program No. (01 -ETC.) Maintenance ROUTE NO. ROUTE NO. ROUTE NO. Function 001 .101 227 1.22 Miles 6.86 Miles 2.68 Milg HM -11 - - 01 & 02 Flex. be cleaned -0- curb & Rigid Rd. Maint. Prg. Activity: street to X -specific HM -21 - 03 Roadside Mainte- miles_. nance Specific Activity: X (4) (4) X (4) HM -22 - 04 Roadside Litter & and Debris Specific Activity: X (1) (2) X (3) HM -.23 - 05 Vegetation Control Activity: -Specific HM -41 - 06 Pavement Delineation - Specific Activity: X HM -42 - 07 Signs Specific Activity: HM -43 - 08 Electrical Activity: Refer Exhibit A X - X .Specific HM -44 - 09 Traffic Safety Devices Specific Activity: HM -25 - 12 Landscaping Activity: -Specific HM -31 - 13 Bridges & Pump Maint. Specific Activity: X HM -47 - 15 Permits -Specific Activity: X HM -46 - 16 Electrical Energy ' S ecific Activity: Refer Exhibit A X_ X Footnotes: (1) Length of street-to be cleaned 4 curb miles. (2) Length of street to be cleaned -0- curb miles. (3) Length of street to be cleaned 5.76 curb miles_. (4) CITY will maintain sidewalks and shall be responsible for any costs therein. K. SUBMISSION OF BILLS: The CITY shall submit bills monthly. Bills must be submitted promptly following close of corresponding billing period and should be coded according to the Caltrans program or Budgetary Code as outlined in this Agreement. Equipment shall be charged at mutually acceptable rental rates and labor and material at actual cost. The CITY will be allowed to recover overhead and administrative costs only to the extent that such charges include applicable expenses incurred by the CITY in the execution of the work. Said factors and method shall be subject to approval by the STATE. Maintenance services provided by contract or on a unit -rate basis with overhead costs included shall not have these above.mentioned charges added again. An actual handling charge for processing this type of bill will be allowed the CITY. Bills submitted to the CITY for work performed by this Agreement will also include . overhead and administrative costs in accordance with the State Administrative Manual. Emergency and storm repairs performed by the CITY would be paid for only with prior approval of the State's Highway Super- intendent of that specific area. In addition the CITY should immediately notify the State's Highway Superintendent for the area of any storm damage or other emergency condition affecting the STATE highway. The CITY shall maintain, on a generally accepted accounting basis complete, and accurate records that support all billings. These records shall be made available to STATE representatives for review during normal business hours for a period of three (3) years after payment of said billings. L. TERM OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall become effective and shall remain in full force and effect until amended or terminated. The Agreement as above may be amended or terminated at any time upon mutual consent of the parties thereto. This Agreement may also be terminated by either party upon thirty days notice to the other party. l IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. Approved as to form and procedure: . 44 � City Attofney By /CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO By `,'�^ i May elanie ail ig C'ty Clerk Pam-1,T- Voges STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADRIANA GIANTURCO Director of Transportation By District Director follows: RESOLUTION NO. 4814 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 608, CUESTA HIGHLANDS III. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, as SECTION 1. That the public improvements for Tract 608 are hereby accepted for maintenance by the City of San Luis Obispo.' SECTION 2'. The Council authorizes release of the subdivision bonds J. on file and accepts a maintenance bond in .the amount of $37;500.00 to guarantee the improvements for one (1) year. SECTION 3. The Council accepts an assignment of Northern California Savings and Loan Association Savings Account No. 3- 239242 -5 from Cuesta Associates in the amount of twenty -two thousand dollars ($22,000.00) to guarantee fencing and landscaping required per Tract No. 608 (Condition A) as specified in item 3 of the attached letter and incorporated herein, from Gerald W. Kenny to Cuesta Associates, dated April 9, 1982. On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilman Griffin , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin.and Ma y Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 4th. day of May_ , 1982. R 4814 r� Resolution No. 4814 (1982 Series) ATTEST: City C I erk Pamela Vog APPROVED: Cit Administrative Off'cer City Attorney Public Services Directo r April 9, 1982 `T- 60F I B -P(3 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT Pr7a Othce Box 321 • San Luis Obispo. CA 93406 -0321 • 8051541-1000 Cuesta Associates Attn: Mr. Robert R. Baker P. 0. Box 419 Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 SUBJECT: Final Acceptance of Tract 603 and Tract 608 . Public Improvements Dear Bob: In reply refer to: 180: G1dK This letter is to inform you of the requirements to be met prior to acceptance of the public improvements and release of the bonds for the subject tracts. TRACT 603 1. The construction inspector must transmit a statement that the improvements have been satisfactorily installed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Community Development Department will concur with our department the recommendation to the City Council that the improvements be accepted and authorize release of the bonds subject to completion of the fence within Tract 603. 2. In accordance with the subdivision agreement, 10% of the performance bond amount must be retained for one (1) year after acceptance of the improvements. This is normally done by submittal of a separate "maintenance" bond. The maintenance bond must be in the amount of $42,840.00. TRACT 608 1 Same as Item 1 above for Tract 603. 2. Same as Item 2 a',ove for Tract 608. Submittal of a maintenance bond must be in the amount of $37,500.00. The Cite Council agreed.to allow you to postpone the fencing and landscaping improvements required per Condition 4 of tlue resolution approving the Tentative Tract subject to submittal of a cash deposit. The amount of this deposit has been set at $22,000.00. An agreement which specifies the improvements shall be installed within two (2) years from the dale of the agreement, or, when the first-building permit on any of the lots requiring said fencing and landscaping is issued whichever is first. The cash deposit could be in the form of a "set- aside no-count" which allows the city to utilize the funds should the developer fail to complete the improvements specified in Cuesta AssocLatcs 1.80:(;WK April 9, 1932 Page Two the agreement. I will prepare and transmit this agreement to you within the next several days. The ahovementioned items must be completed and submitted by April 21, 1982 in order to be considered.on the May 4, 1982 City Council Agenda. If you have any questions regarding this matter,*please contact me. Sincerely, Wayne A. Peterson City Engineer Gerald W. Kdnny Supervising Civil Engineer C.C. George Thacher - City Attorney Tom Gingg - Engineering Dept. Ken Bruce - Planning Dept. David F. Romero- Public Services Director Tract 603 and 608 Files GWK:jlw Attachments - Memos to Tom Gingg from Ray Pitt dated 3/15/82 - Checklist eca� lee- RESOLUTION NO. 4813 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 603, CUESTA HIGHLANDS II. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. That the public improvements for Tract 603 are hereby accepted for maintenance by the City of San Luis Obispo. SECTION 2. The Council authorizes release of the "set -aside letter" on file and accepts a maintenance bond in the amount of $42,840.00 to guarantee the improvements for one (1) year. On motion of Councilman Settle and on the following roll call vote: seconded by Councilman Griffin AYES: Councilmembers.:Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 4th day of 1982. Y A Al k 0 MAY 6R 17 F, C. ILLIG . ATTEST: I /�Z" 1 CITY ERK PAMELA VOOES R 4813 Imo. Resolution No. 48131(1982 Series) APPROVED: Q Q �' Zity'ldministrative Of icer City Attorney Public Services Director 6(%/ Cc 1) Q EkKy K�� y RESOLUTION 110.4812 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CONSIDERING THE SAN LUIS OBSIPO COUNTY :.ARTS PLAN WHEREAS, the California State Legislature and the California Arts Council established the State /Local Partnership to encourage local arts and cultural planning and decision - making; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo County has designated the San Luis Obispo Arts Council to direct and implement the State /Local Partnership Program - sponsored plan development for San Luis Obispo County; and WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Arts Council has completed Phase I of a County Arts Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of San Luis Obispo has reviewed the Phase I plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of San Luis Obispo has reviewed Phase I of the Arts Plan as prepared by the San Luis Obispo County Arts Council and finds that it fulfills the requirements of Phase I of the County Arts Plan. On motion of Councilwoman Dovey , seconded by Mayor Billig and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Dunin, Griffin, Settle and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 4th day of May, 1982. ATTEST: Ci4 Clerk Pamela oges R 4812 Resolution No. .4812,`982 Series) `, Page 2 APPROVED: 0, 4�;n City Administrative Officer City Attorney AlYff-COUY7CI I 0 O 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4811 (1982 Series) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO DESTROY CERTAIN PERSONNEL FILES. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The Chief of Police hereby is authorized to destroy the per- sonnel records of those sworn and non -sworn former employees listed on , Exhibit "A" (2 pages), attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On motion of Councilman Settle and on the following roll call vote: seconded by Councilman Dunin. AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this _4th__ day of May , 1982. ATTEST: (/ L CITY ERR PAMELA VOG CONSENTED TO AND APPROVED: City Attorney APPROVED: City Administrative Officer' R 4811 =nt;=i List of Former PoV" -k" Officers whose Personnel Filer �e Intend to Destroy Name 1. Wells, Fred 2. Costello, Patrick 3. Matthews, Alan 4. Kalicicki, Robert 5. Morrissey, Winston 6. Dickson, Randolph 7. Waite, Rolland 8. Anderson, William 9. Farris, James 10. Carmack, Noel 11. Sperlo, William 12. McKernon, Ronald 13. Lawless, Philip 14. Reitz, Richard 15'. Braiwi ck, Steven 16. Jayne, Ward 17. Quinn, Stephen 18. Simmons, Preston 19. Taylor, Davis 20. Rocha, Frank 21. Morse, Ted 22. Musgrave, Duane 23. Weishaar, Robert 24. Olive, Douglas 25. Youngblood, Gary 26. Roth, Curtis 27. Schofield, William 28. Norton, James 29. Schacht, Richard 30. Rasmussen, Robert 31. Snodgrass, Forrest 32. Short, Kennith 33. Nobriga, Edwin 34. Storton, Timothy . 35. Ryan, Wilford 36. Vaden, Raymond 37. Rayburn, Richard 38. Scheid, Harry 39. Prescott, Grady 40. Samuels, Don 41. Reeves, William 42. Radaus, Joseph 43. Owens, Daniel 44. Roberts, David 45. Sumner, William 46. Silva,.Joe Date of Hire 10 -16 -71 12 -31 -74 01.16 -73 10 -16 -63 10 -14 -63 04 -16 -74 05 -07 -54 04 -01 -64 07 -22 -63 07 -01 -66 07 -16 -56 08 -16 -64 12 -16 -67 04- 16 -70. 10 -01 -72 05 -01 -64 07 -16 -68 10 -01 -67 12 -16 -67 05 -01 -64 02 -01 -60 11 -16 -64 08 -01 -66 12 -01 -60 06 -01 -64 04 -01 -64 02 -01 -56 08 -16 -59 07 -01 -56 12 -16 -61 07 -01 -61 08 -16.58 12 -01 -60 07 -01 -59 08 -16 -50 01 -07 -54 05 -07 -55 12 -16 -59 05 -01 -57 08 -01 -58 04 -30 -49 03 -01 -57 07 -19 -52 10 -01 -56 09 -19-52 02 -23 -52 Date of.Termination 12 -08 -76 10 -31 -76 10 -15 -76 12- 19 -75. 11 -13 -75 10 -10 -75 11 -08 -74 05- 06 -74. 03 -23 -74 08 -31 -73 07 -31=73 06 -30 -73 06 -03 -73 05 -15 -73 03 -01 -73 11 -21 -72 08 -31 -71 08 -06 -71 06 -15 -70 01 -06 -70 09 -16 -68 03 -31 -68 01 -25 -68 02 -26 -67 07 -24 -66 07 -06 -66 03 -07 -66 11 -05x65 07 -16.65 11 -12 -64 10 -05 -63 09- 15 -63'' 07- 16 -62: 12 -31 -61 09- 07 -61.. 09- 05 =61" 04 -23 -61 1T -01 =60 09- 30 -'60 01 -07 -60 05- 29 -59,. 04 -30 -57 12- 31 =56. 12- 31-56; 09- 15,56 04 -15 -56 d X 4. J.0 b Former Employees other than Police Officers whose Personnel Files We�Intend to Destroy Name Date of Hire Date of Termination 1. O'Neal, Marsha 07 -01 -73 12 -31 -76 2. Wilkinson, Janet 01 -27 -75 12 -15 -76 3. Orth, Mary 07 -01 -73 11 -30 -76 4. Jordan, Margie 05 -18 -55 04 -30 -76 S. Hall, Judith 08 -16 -68 03 -24 -76 6. Ripa, Sherri 09.16 -74 01 -31 -75 7. Ray, Susan 07 -01 -66 01 -2645 8. Healy, Linda 08 -01 -68 09 -20 -74 9. Johns, Johnny 09 -16 -69 06 -30 -74 10. Sigsby, Ava. 05- 01 -71. 06 -09 -73 11. Floyd, Ruth 10 -16 -68 04 -01 -72 12. Yates, Sandra 07 -01 -67 03 -26 -71 13. Robinson, Bette 05 -01 -71 05 -09 -71 14. Patton, Beverly 06 -26 -68 09 -20 -69 15. Sohn, Diane 01 -16 -65 04 -01 -66 16. Seifert, Annette 04 -01 -63 12 -16 -64 17. Thomas-, Virginia 07 -10 -63 03 -15 -64 .18. Stephens, Wanda 05 -01 -62 08 -15 -63 19. Wray, Phyllis 08=01 -60 02 -15 -63 20. Schacht, Daisy 08 -18 -60 06 -09.61 21. Olson, Reita 06 -22 -59 12 -15 -59 22. O1son,.June 09 -10 -56 03 -10 -57 23. Vance, Genevieve 04 -11 -55 09 -01 -56 24. Warner, Me]vilen 05 -01 -62 Unknown (prior to five year period of time) 1 Co X- L�` Ql /CC'J .J :. �/� � ' : - -.1 �; s. _. RESOLUTION NO. 4810 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF-SAN LUIS OBISPO CALLING ON THE PRESIDENT AND THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO JOIN IN A TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS PRODUCTION, WHILE SEEKING A PERMANENT, INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS BAN. WHEREAS, as elected officials, we are alarmed by an international political climate that increasingly presents nuclear war as a "rational" possibility; and WHEREAS, present medical and scientific evidence shows that nuclear war, even a "limited" one, would result in death, injury, and disease on a scale unprecedented in human history; and WHEREAS, the economic, ecological and social fabric on which human life depends could be destroyed in American cities; and WHEREAS, the present costs of preparation for nuclear war are so draining the national resources that local officials are unable to provide adequately for the general welfare, the very function we were elected to perform; NOW;:THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT WE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, call on the President and the Congress of the United States to act immediately to reduce tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union; and to ask the Soviet Union to join in a temporary suspension of nuclear weapons production, while seeking a permanent, international nuclear weapons ban. We make these pleas.from a sense of crisis and call upon our President and Congress to act with an equal sense of urgency. R 4810 IF �I Resolution No. 4810 (1982 Series) 1 On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Griffin and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Griffin, Settle and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of April,1982. ATTEST: City oAerk Pamela ges Approved: JaAd 6- City Administrative Offidei At/JL41C-X�- City Attorney �i /-� �C�ri�'J �chel�s RESOLUTION NO. 4809 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBI_SPO AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS ON SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL TRANSIT. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. To award the contract for vehicle operations on San J Luis Obispo Municipal Transit (a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference) to Cal Coast Charter, Inc. SECTION 2. To authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.. On motion of Councilman Griffin -seconded-by :Councilwoman Dovey and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmambers Griffin, Dovey, Settle and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20thday of April ' , 1982. MA 0 :MELANIE C. BILLIG ATTEST: - ; CITY PtERK PAMEIA V S Cit Attorney Pu lic Se ices Director R 4809 r RESOLUTION NO. 48080982 Series) J A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION 82 -31 LOCATED AT 951 HIGUERA STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: - SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of the tentative map of Minor Subdivision No. 82 -31 and the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed parcel map and design are consistent with the general plan. 2. The site is physically suited for the proposed type and density of development which is permitted by the C -C zone. 3. The design is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious health problems. 4. The design of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with public easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 5. The proposed parcel map is categorically exempt from environmental requirements. On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilman Griffin, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin R 4808 Resolution No.¢808(1982 Series) Minor Subdivision 82 -31 Page 2 ,f the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of Apra , 1982. ATTEST: /Z.. City lerk Pam la Y es APPROVED (Pw,A.e a 5 � Administrative Office City Attorney ` Interi& Cdpfmunity Development Director C�l� , v , �� RESOLUTION NO. 4807 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION 82 -37 LOCATED AT 3001 BROAD STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of the tentative map of Minor Subdivision No. 82 -37 and the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings: 1. The proposed parcel map and design are consistent with the general plan. 2. The site is physically suited for the proposed type and density of development which is permitted by the C -S -S zone. 3. The design is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious health problems. 4. The design of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with public easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.. 5. The proposed parcel map is categorically exempt from environmental requirements. SECTION 2. Condition. That the approval of the tentative map for Minor Subdivision 82 -37 be subject to the following condition: 1. Final map shall show drainage easement along south property line for adjacent lot to the approval of the City Engineer. R 4807 Resolution No. 4807 (1982 Series) Minor Subdivision 82 -37 Page 2 On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dovey , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey., Griffin and MAyor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of April , 1982. ATTEST: City Clerk Pamela ges APPROVED o-� Q s Administrative Offic r City Attorney Interi C4j unity Development Coordinator UD I RESOLUTION NO. 4806 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR TRACT 1034 (LELAND TERRACE) LOCATED AT 2200 FLORENCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of the tentative map of Tract 1034 and the Planning Commission's recommendations; staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings: 1.' The tentative map is consistent with the general plan and Terrace Hill Planned Development. 2. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the general plan and Terrace Hill Planned Development project. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause public health problems. 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 8. The previous project EIR certified for PD 0644 (Terrace Hill Planned Development project) is found acceptable for this project. SECTION 2. Conditions. That the approval of the tentative map for Tract 1034 be subject to the following conditions: 1. Subdivider shall grant public utilities easements adjacent to private streets and driveways and over the entirety of common areas to the approval of the utility companies and the City Engineer. 2. Easements for public sewer and water lines shall be granted to the city, to the approval of the City Engineer. R 4806 h Resolution No. 4806 (1982 Series) Tract 1034 (Leland Terrace) Page 2 3. Water and sewer mains shall be sized to the approval of the City Engineer. 4. A note shall be placed on the final map indicating that purchasers of units above the water service limit as determined by the City Engineer, shall be required to sign an agreement pursuant to California Administrative Code Title 22, acknowledging that water pressures would be less than 20 pounds per square inch under certain circumstances. 5. Subdivider shall install pressure booster pumps for units above the water service limit, as determined by the City Engineer, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. Subdivider shall install "no parking" signs and red curbing along private streets as required by the City Fire Department and City Engineer. 7. Subdivider shall install traffic control and street signs as required by the City Engineer. 8. The private streets shall be designed with a traffic index = 4.0. 9. Street and driveway grades and alignments shall be subject to modifications to the approval of the City Engineer. 10. Drainage improvements approved as a part of the precise development plan for Leland Terrace protion of PD 0644 shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11. An "engineered grading plan" shall be required for all grading and site improvements. 12. All on -site drainage structures shall be owned and maintained by homeowners association, except culvert between Florence and Bushnell Streets. Easements shall be granted for said culvert to the approval of the City Engineer. 13. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants and restrictions to be approved by the City Attorney and Community Development Director prior to final map approval. CC &R's shall contain the following provisions: A. A homeowner's association to enforce the CC &R's and provide for professional perpetual maintenance of all common areas including landscaping, private streets and driveways, street signs, private utilities, drainage facilties, lighting, walls, fences, etc., in first class conditions; homeowners association shall maintain common lot. Resolution No. 4806 (1982 Series) Tract 1034 (Leland Terrace) Page 3 B. Grant to the City of San Luis Obispo the right to maintain common area if the Homeowner's Association fails to perform and assess the Homeowner's Association for expenses in and the right of the city to inspect the site at mutually agreed times to assure conditions of CC&R's and final map are being met. C. No parking on the site except in approved designated spaces.. D. Grant to the City of San Luis Obispo the right to order vehicles to be towed away on a complaint basis, which are parking in unauthorized places. E. No outside storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers, nor long —term storage of inoperable vehicles. F. No outside storage by individual units except in designated storage areas. G. No change in city— required provisions of CC&R's without prior City Council approval. H. Homeowner's Association shall file with the City Clerk the names and addresses of all officers of the Homeowner's Association within 15 days of any change in membership of the Homeowner's Association. Said change shall be filed with the City Clerk. 14. Unit driveways and private streets shall have street numbers per addressing plan as Exhibit A. Subdivider shall install directory signs at project entrances, to the approval of the Community Development Director. Street names as shown on the map are approved. 15. Final map shall not be approved until the final map for Tract No. 758 is approved and recorded. 16. Subdivider shall comply with all approved precise development plan conditions and "requirements of the Architectural Review Commission prior to city acceptance of the tract. 17. A note shall be placed on the final map that units constructed in this tract will be required to have Class A fire retardant roofs as specified in the Uniform Building Code by the authority of Uniform Fire Code Section 10.301(b). 18. A note shall be placed on the final map that all garages in the tract shall be equipped with automatic garage door openers. 19. Subdivider shall soundproof the interior of the dwelling units to a 45 db level consistent with the General Plan Noise Element. �l Resolution No. =:4806 (1982 Series) Tract 1034 (Leland Terrace) Page 4 On motion of Councilwoman Dovey , seconded by Councilman Settle , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle, Griffin and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of April , 1982. ATTEST: CiV Clerk Pamela oges APPROVED e",P- a —f" Administrative Officer City Attorney Interim ity Development Coordinator k z � 5% EXHII TxfiCT A DDRf'S5 //YG IIT Q /03¢ ,►m 0 1 { f �� � �� � P �,�,`� ��� RESOLUTION NO. 4805. (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO INCREASING THE 19.81/82 OPERATING BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of. San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. That the 1981/83 Operating Budget be amended as detailed in Exhibit A entitled "1981 -82 Budget Review - Appropriation Adjustments ". On motion of Councilman_ Griffin seconded by Councilman-Settle , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember§ Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of April 1982. ATTEST: ants CITY CLERK PAMELA V GES APP VED: 70-A a s City Administrnative.'Officler City At y Finan it or w R 4805 n 1981 -82 BUDGET REVIEW APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS CURRENT REVISED ADJUSTMENT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT General Fund City Council (00) Office Expense 01 =2A02 5,300 7,740 2,440 Advertising (City Newsletter) 01 -2A03 3,500 4,000 500 Telephone Expense 01_ -2AO4 1,600 2,800 1,200 4,140 Human_Relations Commission (00) Employee Services (Temp.) 01 -2GO1 -0- 450 450 Jack Residence-Committee (00) Office Expense 01 =2M02 100 140 40 Telephone Expense 01 -2M04 200 180 [20] Travel Expense 01 - -2M11 50 80 30 Materials & Supplies 01 -2M12 100 200 100 150 Non Departmental Expenses (05) Other City Expenditu =es 01 -3998 5,000 10,000 5,000 Emergency Services (05) Emergency Equipment 01 -4452 825 19375 550 City Administrator (10) Employee Services 01- 2101 '. `:- 105 -,370 115,250`. 9,880 Office Expense 01 -2102 29*525 -33100 _ 575: 10,455 City Attorney (15) Employee-Services 01 -2401 66,160 68,900 2,740 Office.Expense 01 -2402 6,670 8,980 2,310 Contract Services 01 -2408 22,870 37,870 15,000 20,050 City Clerk (20) Office Expense 01- 2202 4,450 7,600 3,150 Advertising 01 -2203 15,000 18,000 3,000 6,150 Personnel Department (30) Office Expense 01 =2702 6,900 9,500 2,600 Telephone Expense 01 -2704 1,600 3,000 1,400 Contract Services 01 -2708 29,100 57,600 28,500 32,500 Community Development- Planning (40) Special Planning Studies 01 -2513 15,000 -0- [15,000] Community Development- Building Insp. (40) Employee Services 01 -4201 143,950 133,000 [10,950] r] DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT General Fund.(cont'd.) Public_Services- Administration (505 Other Equipment 01 -2152 Public Services- Engineering (50) Employee Services 01 -4701 Traffic Signals & Lighting (50) Utilities 01 -5105 Contract Services 01 -5108 I"D CURRENT REVISED BUDGET ESTIMATE -0- 1,600 325,885 236,000 168,000 205,000 19,350 31,900 Police Protection (80) Employee Services 01 -4001 2,089,850 2,218,750 Fire Protection (85). Employee Services 01- 4101 1,669,750 1,711,600 TOTAL GENERAL FUND ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT 1,600 [89,885] 37,000 12,550 49,550 128,900 41,850 185,510 Parks &-Recreation Fund Parks &_Recreation Programs (60) Employee Services 11 -5701 222,200 227,200 .51000 Utilities (Electric) 11 -5705 17,170 20,200 3,030 Vehicle Expense 11 =5707 4,000 4,900 900 Recreation Programs 11 -5713 102,400 141,200 38,800 47,730 Municipal Golf Course (60) Employee Services 11 -5801 38,970 40,580 1,610 Utilities (Electric) 11 -5805 14,960 22,600 7,6.40 -9,250 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION.FUND 56,980 Water Fund Water Source & Supply (50) Salinas Res. Expense 50 -6013 333,000 377,500 44,500 Whale Rock Res. Expense 50 -6013 219,160 215,000 [4,160] Whale Rock Fishing Program 50 -6013 22,140 15,000 [1,740] 32,600 Water Pumping (50) Utilities (Electric) 50 -6105 16,800 20,000 3,200 Maintenance (Highland Res.Cov.)50 =6163 -0= 6,500 6,500 9,700 Water Treatment Plant (50) Employee Services 50 -6201 141,951 126,000 [15,951] Utilities (Electric) 50 -6205 77,000 90,000 13,000 Materials & Supplies (Chem) 50 -6212_ 160,250 .13.0,000 [30,250] [33,201] -2- DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT Water-Fund (cont'd.) Water Customer Service (50) Water Meters & Parts 50 -6413 Water Engineering & Admin. (50) Contract Services 50 -6508 TOTAL WATER FUND Parking-Fund Parking - Facilities (50) Utilities (Electric) 51 -6805 Rents & Leases (Gr. Western) 51 -6806 Special Parking Survey 51 -6814 Parking Lot Resurfacing 51 -6863 Parking-Enforcement (50) Employee Services 51 -6901 TOTAL PARKING FUND Sewer Fund Sewer Treatment Plant (50) Employee Services 52 -7101 Utilities (Electric) 52 -7105 Source Control Prog. - - -- Sewer.General & Admin. (50) Coritiact Services 50 -7.208 TOTAL SEWER FUND TOTAL ALL FUNDS -3- CURRENT REVISED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT. 29,500 49,500 20,000 3,000 10,000 7,000 36,099 2,050 3,300 1,250 3,780 4,550 770 5,500 7,100 1,600 -0- 2,500 2,500 6,120 40,560 42,500 1,940 8,060 161,150 171,500 65,800 78,000 -0- 10,350 12,200 3,200 25,750 2,000 7,500 5,500 31,250 317,899 /�nar�e� �� ��� o (7, RESOLUTION NO. 4804 (1982 Series) _J A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ACCEPTING BID AND A14ARDING A CONTRACT BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. That this Council hereby accepts the bid and authorizes the Mayor to sign a contract on behalf of the City for the following: PROJECT: "WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, BEACH STREET, PACIFIC TO PISMO" ESTIMATE: $17,365 w/o contingencies BIDDER: Fred Julien & Associates CITY PLAN NO: F -09 BUDGET ACCOUNT: 40- 6362 -715 (F -09) BID AMOUNT: $14,180 SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is directed to prepare the appropriate documents for signature by the successful bidder and the Mayor. On motion of Cnfinrilman Griffin , seconded by Counrilman- Sat -fla e and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmemebers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman!:Dunin the. foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 2nth day of Aril. , 1982. ATTEST: CITY dLERK PAMELA VO S APPROVED: City Administrative 0 ficer I City Attorney finance it 9e 4e 4e * 9c * fie. 4e R 4804 '�li ;�f7C'� %I /f� Q '� "o�fraGfor RESOLUTION NO. 4803 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. That this Council hereby accepts the bid and authorizes the Mayor to sign a contract on behalf of the City for the following: PROJECT: "WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PLAN NO: F -08 LINCOLN STREET, BROAD TO CHORRO" ESTIMATE: $18,357 w/o contingencies BUDGET ACCOUNT: 40- 6362 -715 (F -08) BIDDER: Fred Julien & Associates BID AMOUNT: $14,531 SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is directed to prepare the appropriate documents for signature by the successful bidder and the Mayor. On motion of Councilman Griffin ., seconded by Cot;nc;lman qprrlp , and on the following roll call vote:. AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of _April , 1982. r ATTEST: CITY C ERK PAMELA VOG APPROVED: City Administrative Officer City Attorne Fina or t R 4803 F1 1 IPi �a0-�- RESOLUTION NO. 4802 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE ARCHITECTURAL FIRM OF ROSS, LEVIN AND MAC INTYRE TO PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL BUILDING AND SOLAR HEATING PACKAGE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. That the firm of Ross, Levin and Mac Intyre, Architects, be. engaged to prepare plans and specifications for municipal swimming pool building and solar heating package as per attached Exhibit A with accompanying cover letter. SECTION 2. That Jim Stockton, Director of Parks and Recreation, be named as person with day - to-day responsibility for the project. SECTION 3. The Mayor is authorized to execute the agreement on. behalf of the City. On motion by Councilman Griffin , seconded by Councilman Settle , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmen Dunin the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of April , 1982. ATTEST: CITY CL PAMELA. VOG APPROVED: City Administrative Offic r Vin rec —r, City Attorney \-_2_ar�k-& Rec)K tion Director R 4802 l��ecy�fia� ��Pl� ��r� � � . �� /v Ross Levitt' & Madntyre Architects JOHN R. ROSS FAA RODNEY R. LEVIN AIA KENNETH H. MACINTYRE AIA April 13, 1982 Mr. Jim Stockton Director of Recreation City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Re: Bath Facility City Mtimicipal Swimming Pool Sinshiemer Park, SLO, CA Dear Mr. Stockton: We wish to take this opportunity to thank you and the City Cauncil.for selecting the Firm of Ross Levin & Maclntyre, Architects for the above referenced project. Following is our proposal to provide Architectural Services based on negotiations between you, Ken Maclntyre.and myself on Tuesday, April 13, 1982. In brief, the project scope will include a new 6100 sq.ft. + bath facility (shower- locker roans, basket /office control, multi -use room, tot's shower, dress and lobby), solar package to aid in the heating of the (E) and future tanks and a domestic hot water pre -heat system and related site work. Estimate of Construction Costs New Bath Facility including site work, 6100 sq.ft. 3 $ $72 /sq.ft. _ $439,200 Solar Package/Domestic Hot Water/Pre-Heat = $152,357 TOTAL $591,557 Architectural/Engineering Fee Computations Bath Facility - $439,200 @ 870 = $ 35,136 Solar Package /Domestic Hot Water/Pre -Heat - $152,357 @ 5% _ $ 7,617 SUBTOTAL $ 42,753 Credit for Schematic Design (4,500) TOTAL BASIC FEE $38,253 1129 Marsh Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 (805) 543 -1291 Mr. J. Stockton April 13, 1982 Page 2 Enclosed please find a copy of the AIA Dociunent B141 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect and Ross Levin & Maclntyre Architects' Hourly Rate Schedule. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call. Yom /truly, Rodney R. Levin, Enclosure THE AMLPKAN INSTITUTE OF Ak%.-I- HITECTS ; AIA Document B141 Standard Form Of Agreement Between Owner and Architect 1977 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION AGREEMENT made as of the Hundred and BETWEEN the Owner: and the Architect: day of City of San Luis P.O. Box 321 San Luis Obispo, Obispo CA 93406 in the year of Nineteen John R. Ross & Associates, Inc. dba Ross Levin & Maclntyre, Architects 1129 Marsh Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 For the following Project: (include detailed description of Project location and scope.) Design of New 6100 sq.ft.+ Bath Facility and Related Solar Systems City Municipal Swimming Pool Sinshiemer Park San Luis Obispo, California The Owner and the Architect agree as set forth below. Copyright 1917, 1926, 1948, 1951, 1953, 1958, 1961, 1 %3, 1966. 1 %7, 1970, 1974, 0 1977 by The American Institute of Architects, 1735 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. Reproduction of the material herein or substantial quotation of its provisions without permission of the AIA violates the copyright laws of the United States and will be subject to legal prosecution. AIA DOCUMENT 8141 • OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT, THIRTEENTH - EDITION • IUIY 1977 i AIAS • p 1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 8141 -1977 1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARTICLE 1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES BASIC SERVICES The Architect's Basic Services consist of the five phases described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5 . and include normal structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and any other services included in Article 15 as part of Basic Services. 1,1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 1.1.1 The Architect shall review the program fumished by the Owner to ascertain the requirements of the Project and shall review the understanding of such. requirements with the Owner. 1.1.2 The Architect shall provide a preliminary evalua- tion of the program and the Project budget requirements, each in terms of the other, subject to the limitations set forth in Subparagraph 3.2.1. 1.13 The Architect shall review with the Owner alterna- tive approaches to design and construction of the Project. 1.1.4 Based on the mutually agreed upon program and Project budget requirements, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Schematic Design Documents consisting of drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of Project components. 1.15 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a State- ment of Probable Construction Cost based on current area, volume or other unit costs. 1,2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1.2.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Docu- ments and any adjustments authorized by the Owner in the program or Project budget, the Architect shall pre- pare, for approval by the Owner, Design Development Documents consisting of drawings and other documents to fix and describe the size. and character of the entire Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and elec- trical systems, materials and such other elements as may be appropriate. 1.2.2 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a further Statement of "Probable Construction Cost. 1.3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1.3.1 Based on the approved Design Development Doc- uments and any further adjustments in the scope or qual- ity of the Project or in the Project budget authorized by the Owner, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Construction Documents consisting of Draw- ings and Specifications setting forth in detail the require- ments for the construction of the Project. 1.3.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner in the prepara- tion of the necessary bidding information, bidding forms, the Conditions of the Contract, and the form of Agree- ment between the Owner and the Contractor. 1.3.3 The Architect shall advise the Owner of any adjust- ments to previous Statements of Probable Construction Cost indicated by changes in requirements or general market conditions. 1.3.4 The Architect shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents re- quired for the approval of governmental authorities hav- ing jurisdiction over the Project. 1,4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 1.4.1 The Architect, following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost, shall assist the Owner in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals, and assist in awarding and preparing contracts for construction. 1,5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE — ADMINISTRATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1.5.1 The Construction Phase will commence with the award of the Contract for Construction and, together with the Architect's obligation to provide Basic Services under this Agreement, will terminate when final payment to the Contractor is due, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment or of such due date, sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work, whichever occurs first 15.2 Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement and incorporated in the Contract Documents, the Architect shall provide administration of the Contract for Construc- tion as set forth below and in the edition of AIA Docu- ment A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Con- struction, current as of the date of this Agreement. 1.5.3 The Architect shall be a representative of the Owner during the Construction Phase, and shall advise . and consult with the Owner. Instructions to the Contrac- tor shall be forwarded through the Architect. The Archi- tect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in the Contract Documents unless otherwise modified by written instrument in ac- cordance with Subparagraph 1.5.16, 1.5.4 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals ap- propriate to the stage of construction or as otherwise agreed by the Architect in writing to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the Work and to determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accord- ance with the Contract Documents. However, the Archi- tect shall not be required to make exhaustive or con- tinuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quan- tity of the Work. On the basis of such on -site observa- tions as an architect, the Architect shall keep the Owner informed of the progress and quality of the Work, and shall endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor. 15.5 The Architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, for the acts or omissions of the Contractor, Sub- AIA DOCUMENT 8141 • OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION JULY 19-,7 AIA'0 v 19777 THE AMERIC.AN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20W6 B141 -1977 3 0 contractors or any other persons performing any of the Work, or for the failure'of any of them to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 15.6 The Architect shall at all times have access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. 15.7 The Architect shall determine. the amounts owing to the Contractor based on observations at the site and on evaluations of the Contractor's Applications for Payment, and shall issue Certificates for Payment in such amounts, as provided in the' Contract Documents. 15.8 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall constitute a representation by the Architect to the Owner, based on the Architect's observations at the site. as pro- vided in Subparagraph 1.5.4 and on the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment, that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief, the qual- ity of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments (subject to an evaluation of the Work for con- formance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests re- quired by or performed under the Contract Documents, to minor deviations from the Contract Documents cor- rectable prior to completion, and to any specific qualifica tions stated in the Certificate for Payment); and that the Contractor is entitled to payment.in the amount certified. However, the. issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has made any examination to ascertain how and for what purpose the Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Sum. 1.5.9 The Architect shall be the interpreter of the re- quirements of the Contract Documents and the judge of the performance thereunder by both the Owner and Contractor. The Architect shall render interpretations nec- essary for the proper execution or progress of the Work with reasonable promptness on written request of either the Owner or the Contractor, and shall render written de- cisions, within a reasonable time, on all claims, disputes and other matters in question between the Owner and the Contractor relating to the execution or progress of the Work or the interpretation of the Contract Documents. 1.5.10 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable . from the Contract Documents and shall be in written or graphic form. In the capacity of interpreter and judge, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful perform- ance by both the Owner and the Contractor, shall not show partiality to either, and shall not be liable for the result of any interpretation or decision rendered in goad faith in such capacity. 15.11 The Architect's decisions in matters relating to artistic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. The Architect's decisions on any other claims, disputes or other matters, including those in question between the Owner and the Contractor, shall be subject to arbitration as provided in this Agree- ment and in the Contract Documents. 1.5.12 The Architect shall have authority to reject Work which does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever, in the Architect's reasonable opinion, it is • necessary or advisable for the implementation of the intent of the Contract Docu men ts,.the.Architectwill have author- ity to require special inspection or testing of the Work. in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Docu- ments, whether or not such Work be then fabricated, in- stalled or completed. 1:5.13 The Architect shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon the Contractor's submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Work and with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness so as to cause no delay. The Architect's ap- proval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. 1.5.14 The Architect shall prepare Change. Orders for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents, and shall have authority to order minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time which are not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. 15.15 The Architect shall conduct inspections to deter- mine the Dates of Substantial Completion and final com- pletion, shall receive and forward to the Owner for the Owner's review written warranties and related documents required by the Contract Documents and assembled by the Contractor, and shall issue a final Certificate for Pay- ment. 15.16 The extent of the duties, responsibilities and lim- itations of authority of the Architect as the Owner's rep- resentative during construction shall not be modified or extended without written consent of the Owner, the Con- tractor and the Archifect. 1,6 PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES 1.6.1 If the Owner and Architect agree that more ex- tensive representation at the site. than is described in Paragraph 1.5 shall be provided, the Architect shall pro- vide one or more Project Representatives to assist the Architect in carrying out such responsibilities at the site. 1.6:2 Such Project Representatives shall be selected, em- ployed and directed by the Architect, and the Architect Shall be compensated therefor as mutually agreed be- tween the Owner and the Architect as set forth in an ex- hibit appended to this Agreement, which shall describe the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such Project Representatives. 1.6.3 Through the. observations by such Project Repre- sentatives, the Architect shall endeavor to provide further protection for the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, but the furnishing of such project representa- tion shall not modify the rights, responsibilities or obliga- tions of the Architect as described in Paragraph 1.5. 1;7 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following Services are not included in Basic Services unless so identified in Article 15. They shall be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the Owner, and they shall be paid for by the Owner as provided in this Agreement, in addition to the compensation for Basic Services. AIA DOCUMENT $141 - OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT - THIRTEENTH EDITION - DULY 19i, -- AIA'9 - 'cc 1977 4 6141 -1477 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 I 1.7.1 Providing analyses of the Owner's needs, and pro- gramming the requirements of the Project. 1.7.2 Providing financial feasibility or other special studies. 1:7:3 Providing planning surveys, site evaluations, envi- ronmental studies or comparative studies of prospective sites, and preparing special surveys, studies and submis- sions required for approvals of governmental authorities or others having jurisdiction over the Project. 1.7.4 Providing services relative to future facilities, sys- tems and equipment which are not intended to be con- structed during the Construction Phase. 1.7.5 Providing services to investigate existing conditions or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information fur- nished by the Owner. 1.7.6 Preparing documents of alternate, separate or sequential bids or providing extra services in connection with bidding, negotiation or construction prior to the completion of the Construction Documents Phase, when requested by the Owner. 1.7.7 Providing coordination of Work performed by separate contractors or by the Owner's own forces. 1.7.8 Providing services in connection with the work of a construction manager or separate. consultants retained by the Owner. 1.7.9 Providing Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost, analyses of owning and operating costs, or detailed quan- tity surveys or inventories of material, equipment and labor. 1.7.10 Providing interior design and other similar ser- vices required for or in connection with the selection, procurement or installation of furniture, furnishings and related equipment. 1.7.11 Providing services for planning tenant or rental spaces. 1.7.12 Making revisions in Drawings, Specifications or other documents when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given, are required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such doc- uments or are due to other causes not solely within the control of the.Architect. 1.7.13 Preparing Drawings, Specifications and supporting data and providing other services in connection with Change Orders to the extent that the adjustment in the Basic Compensation resulting from the adjusted Con- struction Cost is not commensurate with the services re- quired of the Architect, provided such Change Orders are required by causes not solely within the control of the Architect. 1.7.14 Making investigations, surveys, valuations, inven- tories or detailed appraisals of existing facilities, and serv- ices required in connection with construction performed by the Owner. 1.7.15 Providing consultation concerning replacement of any Work damaged by fire or other cause during con- struction, and furnishing services as may be required in connection with the replacement of such Work. 1.7.16 Providing services made necessary by the default of the Contractor, or by major defects or deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor, or by failure of performance of either the Owner or Contractor under the Contract for Construction. 1.7.17 Preparing'a set of reproducible record drawings showing significant changes in the Work made during construction based on marked -up prints, drawings and other data furnished by the Contractor to the Architect. 1.7.18 Providing extensive assistance in the utilization of any equipment or system such as initial start -up or testing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance, and consultation during operation. 1.7.19 Providing services after issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate for Payment, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment, more than sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work. 1.7.20 Preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration pro- ceeding or legal proceeding. 1.7.21 Providing services of consultants for other than the normal architectural, structural, mechanical and elec- trical engineering services for the Project. 1.7.22 Providing any other services not otherwise in- cluded in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted architectural practice. 1,8 TIME 11.8 ..1 The Architect shall perform Basic and Additional Services as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work. Upon request of the Owner, the Architect shall submit for the Owner's approval, a schedule for the performance of the Architect's services which shall be adjusted as required as the Project proceeds, and shall include allowances for peri- ods of time required for the Owner's review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. This schedule, when approved by the Owner, shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Architect. ARTICLE 2 THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 11 The Owner shall provide full information regarding requirements for the Project including a program, which shall set forth the Owner's design objectives, constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relation- ships, flexibility and expandability, special equipment and systems and site requirements. 2.2 If the Owner provides a budget for the Project it shall include contingencies for bidding, changes in the Work during construction, and other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner, including those described in this Article 2 and in Subparagraph 31.2. The. Owner shall, at the request of the Architect, provide a statement of funds available for the Project, and their source. AIA DOCUMENT 6141 • OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION -• IULY 1977 • AIA& • © 1977 THE A.MERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON. O.C. 20006 B141 -1977 5 2.3 The Owner shall designate, when necessary, a rep- resentative authorized to act in the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner or such authorized representative shall examine the documents submitted by the Architect and shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the Architect's services. 2.4 The Owner shall furnish a legal description and a certified land survey of the site, giving, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoin- ing property; rights -of -way, restrictions, easements, en- croachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions and complete data pertaining to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and full information concerning available serv- ice and utility Sines both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. 2S The Owner shall furnish the services of soil engi- neers or other consultants when such services are deemed necessary by the Architect. Such services shall include test borings, test pits, soil bearing values, percolation tests, air and water pollution tests, ground corrosion and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for determining sub- soil, air and water conditions, with reports and appropri- ate professional recommendations. 2.6 The Owner shall furnish structural, mechanical; chemical and other laboratory tests, inspections and re- ports as required by law or the Contract Documents. 2.7 The Owner shall furnish all legal, accounting and in- surance counseling services as may be necessary at any time for the Project, including such auditing services as the Owner may require to verify the Contractor's Applica- tions for Payment or to ascertain ,how or for what pur- poses the Contractor uses.the moneys paid by or on be- half of the Owner. 2.8 The services; information, surveys and reports re- quired by Paragraphs 2.4 through 2.7 inclusive shall be furnished at the Owner's expense, and the Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. 2.9 If the Owner observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or nonconformance with the Contract Documents, prompt written notice thereof shall be given by the Owner to the Architect. 2.10 The Owner shall furnish required information and services and shall render approvals and decisions as ex- peditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Architect's services and of the Work. ARTICLE 3 CONSTRUCTION COST 3.1 DEFINITION 3.1.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect. 3.1.2 The Construction Cost shall include at current market rates, including a reasonable allowance for over- head and profit, the cost of labor and materials furnished by the Owner and any equipment which has been de- signed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the Architect. 3.13 Construction Cost does not include the compen- sation of the Architect and the Architect's consultants, the cost of the land, rights -of -way, or other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Arti- cle 2. 3.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 3:2.1 Evaluations of the Owner's Project budget, State- ments of Probable Construction Cost and Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost; if any, prepared by the Architect, represent the Architect's best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction indus- try. It is recognized, however, that neither the Architect nor the Owner has control over the cost of labor, mate- rials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of de- termining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the Architect cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the Project budget proposed, established or approved by the Owner, if any, or from any Statement of Probable. Construction Cost or other cost estimate or evaluation prepared by the Archi- tect. 3.2.2 No fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be estab- lished as a condition of this Agreement by the furnishing, proposal or establishment of a Project budget under Sub- paragraph 1.1.2 or-Paragraph 2.2 or otherwise, unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed by the parties hereto. If such a fixed limit has been estab- lished, the Architect shall be permitted to include con- tingencies for design, bidding and price escalation, to de- termine what materials, equipment, component systems and types of construction are to be included in the Con- tract Documents, to make reasonable adjustments in the Scope of the Project and to include in the Contract Docu- ments alternate bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed limit. Any such fixed limit shall be increased in the amount of any increase in the Contract Sum occurring after execution of the Contract for Construction. 3.2.3 If the Bidding or Negotiation Phase has not com- menced within three months after the Architect submits the Construction Documents to the Owner, any Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be ad- justed to reflect any change in the general level of prices in the construction industry between the date of submis- sion of the Construction Documents to the Owner and the date on which proposals are sought. 3.2.4 If a Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost (adjusted as provided in Subparagraph 3.2.3) is ex- ceeded by the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated pro- posal, the Owner shall (1) give written approval of an increase in such fixed limit, (2) authorize rebidding or re- negotiating of the Project within a reasonable time, (3) if the Project is abandoned, terminate in accordance with Paragraph 10.2, or (4) cooperate in revising the Project scope and quality as required to reduce the Construction Cost. In the case of (4), provided a fixed limit of Construc- tion Cost has been established as a condition of this Agree- ment, the Architect, without additional charge, shall mod- ify the Drawings and Specifications as necessary to comply AIA DOCUMENT 8141 v OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT - THIRTEENTH EDITION - JULY 1977, - AIA® - © 1977 6 8141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. MM 0 with the fixed limit. The providing of such service shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility arising from the establishment of such fixed limit, and having done so, the Architect shall be entitled to compensation for all services performed, in accordance with this Agreement, whether or not the Construction Phase is commenced. ARTICLE 4 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 4.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct sal- aries of all the Architect's personnel engaged on the Proj- ect, and the portion of the cost of their mandatory and customary contributions and benefits related thereto, such as employment taxes and other statutory employee bene- fits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions and similar contributions and benefits. ARTICLE 5 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 5.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the Com- pensation for Basic and Additional Services and include actual expenditures made by the Architect and the Archi- tect's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project for the expenses listed in the following Sub- paragraphs: 5.1.1 Expense of transportation in connection with the Project; living expenses in connection with out -of -town travel; long distance communications, and fees. paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 5.1.2 Expense of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents, excluding reproductions for the office use of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. 5.1.3 Expense of data processing and photographic pro- duction techniques when used in connection with Addi- tional Services. 5.1.4 If authorized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. 5.15 Expense of renderings, models and mock -ups re- quested by the Owner. 5.1.6 Expense of any additional insurance coverage or limits, including professional liability insurance, requested by the Owner in excess of that normally carried by the Architect and the Architect's consultants. ARTICLE 6 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 6.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF BASIC SERVICES 6.1.1 An initial payment as set forth in Paragraph 14.1 is the minimum payment under this Agreement. 6.1.2 Subsequent payments for Basic Services shall be made monthly and shall be in proportion to services per- formed within each Phase of services, on the basis set forth in Article 14. 6.1.3 If and to the extent that the Contract Time initially established in the Contract for Construction is exceeded or extended through no fault of the Architect, compensa- tion tor-any Basic Services required for such extended period of Administration of the Construction Contract shall be computed as set forth in Paragraph 14.4 for Addi- tional Services. 6.1.4 When compensation is based on a percentage of Construction Cost, and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for such portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on such portions, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Subparagraph 14.2.2, based on (1) the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal or, (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent Statement of Probable Construction Cost or Detailed Esti- mate of Construction Cost for such portions of the Project. 6.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.2.1 Payments on account of the Architect's Additional Services as defined in Paragraph 1.7 and for Reimbursable. Expenses as defined in Article 5 shall be made monthly upon presentation of the Architects statement of services rendered or expenses incurred. 6.3 PAYMENTS WITHHELD 6.3.1 No deductions shall be made from the Architect's compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damages or other sums withheld from payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the Work other than those for which the Architect is held legally liable. 6.4 PROJECT SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION 6.4.1 If the Project is suspended or abandoned in whole or in part for more than three months; the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed prior to receipt of written notice from the Owner of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 10.4. If the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three months, the Architect's compensation shall be equitably adjusted. ARTICLE 7 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 7.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses per- taining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of a Multiple of Direct. Personnel Expense shall be kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and shall be available to the Owner or the Owner's authorized representative at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 8 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 Drawings and Specifications as instruments of serv- ice are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. The Owner shall be permitted to retain copies, in- cluding reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifica- tions for information and reference in connection with the Owner's use and-occupancy of the Project. The Drawings and Specifications shall not be used by the Owner on AIA DOCUMENT 6141 • OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION'- JULY 197-, • AIAa • © 19i, THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, NAV.. 'WASHINGTON. D.C. 2DD06. 8141 -197 J other projects, for additions to this Project, or for comple- tion of this Project by others provided the Architect is not in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the Archi- tect. 82 Submission or distribution to meet official regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Architect's rights. ARTICLE 9 ARBITRATION 9.1 All claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construc- tion Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitra- tion Association then obtaining unless the parties mutu- ally agree otherwise. No arbitration, arising out of or re- lating to this Agreement, shall include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional person not a party to this Agreement except by written consent con- taining a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by the Architect, the Owner, and any other person sought to be joined. Any consent to arbitration involving an ad- ditional person or persons shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any dispute not described therein or with any person not named or described therein. This Agree- ment to arbitrate and any agreement to arbitrate with an additional person or persons duly consented to by the parties to this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. 9.2 Notice of the demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 9.3 The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. ARTICLE 10 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the party initiating the termination. 10.2 This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner upon at least seven days' written notice to the Architect in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. 10.3 In the event of termination not the fault of the Ar- chitect, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed to termination date, together with .Reimburs- able Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 10.4. 0 10.4 Termination Expenses include expenses directly at- tributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensated, plus an amount computed as a percentage of the total Basic and Additional Compensa- tion earned to the time of termination, as follows: .1 20 percent if termination occurs during the Sche- matic Design Phase; or .2 10 percent if termination occurs during the Design Development Phase; or . .3 5 percent if termination occurs during any subse- quent phase. ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11.1 Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. 11.2 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same mean- ing as those in AIA Document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, current as of the date of this Agreement. 11.3 As between the parties to this Agreement: as to all acts or failures to act by either party to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than the rele- vant Date of Substantial Completion of the Work, and as to any acts or failures to act occurring after the relevant Date of Substantial Completion, not later than the date of issuance of the final Certificate for Payment. 11.4 The Owner and the Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractors, consult- ants, agents and employees of the other for damages cov- ered by any property insurance during construction as set forth in the edition of AIA Document A201, General Con- ditions, current as of the date of this Agreement. The Owner and the Architect each shall require appropriate similar waivers from their contractors, consultants and agents. ARTICLE 12 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 12.1. The Owner and the Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representa- tives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this.Agreement. Neither, the Owner nor the Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. ARTICLE 13 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13A This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agree- ments, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. AIA DOCUMENT 6141 • OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEM1IENT - THIRTEENTH EDITION • ILLY 1977 • AIAh - @ 1977 8 B141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1:37 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20006 CJ 0 ARTICLE 14 BASIS OF COMPENSATION The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the Scope of Services provided, in accordance with Article 6, Payments to the Architect, and the other Terms and Conditions of this Agreement; as follows: 14.1 AN INITIAL PAYMENT of Two Hundred and .00 /100 ------ ==------ - - -: -- dollars ($200.00 ) shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's account as follows: 14.2 BASIC COMPENSATION 14.2.1_ FOR BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5, and any other services included in Article 15 as part of Basic Services, Basic Compensation shall be computed as follows: (Here insert basis of compensation, including fixed amounts, multiples or percentages, and identify Phases to which particular methods of compensa- tion apply, it necessary.) Fixed Amount Less Credit for Schematic Design $ 42,753.00 (4,500.00) $_38,253.00 14.2.2 Where compensation is based on a Stipulated Sum or Percentage of Construction Cost, payments for Basic Services shall be made as provided -in Subparagraph 6.1.2, so that Basic Compensation for each Phase shall equal the following percentages of the total Basic Compensation payable: (Include any additional Phases as appropriate.) Schematic Design Phase: percent (10.5 %) Design Development Phase: percent (20.51%) Construction Documents Phase: percent (54 %) Bidding or Negotiation Phase: percent ( 5 %) Construction Phase: percent (10 %) 14.3 FOR PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraph 1.6, , Compensation shall be computed separately in accordance with Subparagraph 1.6.2. AIA DOCUMENT 9141 • OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 197—, • AIA+1 • 01977 - o THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 6141-197; 9 v 14.4 COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES 14.4.1 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF THE ARCHITECT, as described in Paragraph 1.7, and any other services in- cluded in Article 15 as part of Additional Services, but excluding Additional Services of consultants, Compen sation shall be computed as follows:. (Here insert basis of compensation, including rates and /or multiples of Direct Personnel Expense for Principals and employees, and identify Principals and classify employees, if required. identify-specific services to which particular methods of compensation apply, if necessary.) Refer to attached copy of Architect's Hourly Rate Schedule dated May 1, 1981. 14.4.2 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANTS; including additional sSructural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and those provided under Subparagraph 1.7.21 orden_tified in Article 15 as part of Addi- tional Services, a multiple of .L7 ) times the amounts billed to the Architect for such services. (identify specific types of consultants in Article 15, it required.) 14.5 FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, as described in Article 5, and any other i ems included in Article 15 as Reim- bursable Expenses, a multiple of ( 1.15 ) times the amounts ex- pended by the Architect, the Architect's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project. 14.6 Payments due the Architect and unpaid under this Agreement shall bear interest from the date -payment is due at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Here insert any rate of interest agreed upon.) NM (Usury laws and requirements under the Federal Truth in Lending Act. similar state and local consumer credit laws and other regulations at the Owners and Architect's principal places of business,. the location of the Project and elsewhere may affect the validity of this provision. Specific legal advice should he obiained with respect to deletion. modification, or other requirements such as written disclosures or waivers.) 14.7 The Owner and the Architect agree in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement that: 14.7.1 IF THE SCOPE of the Project or of the Architect's Services is changed materially, the amounts of compensation shall be equitably adjusted. 14.7.2 IF THE SERVICES covered by this Agreement have not been completed within P months of the date hereof, through no fault of the Architect, the amounts of compensation, rates and multiples set forth herein shall be equitably adjusted.. AIA DOCUMENT B141 OWNER- ARCHITECT AGREE..mENT - THIRTEENTH EDITION- JULY 1977 • AIAO • © 1977. 10 8141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.0 20006. NM ARTICLE 15 OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES AIA DOCUMENT 8131 • OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 • AIAS . C 19777, THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. i733 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 2M 8141 -1977 11 This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER City of San Luis Obispo P.O. Box 321 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 BY k M'yo Melanie C. Billig ARCHITECT Ross Levin & MacLntyre, Architects 1129 Marsh Street AIA DOCUMENT 6141 • OWNER - ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • IULY 1977 • AIA'S • Q 1977 12 B141 -1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. :0006 0 May 1, 1981 HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Principal Architect Designing, Engineering and Production Associate Architect Draftsman Steno and Bookkeeping Field Supervision /Observation Certified Architect Consulting Engineers Consultation Travel . Printing Specifications Telephone, long distance Grevhound, UPS •P _ r. p e ,� Ross Levin MacIntyre, Architects Liability Policy i� $ 50.00 per hour 35.00 per hour 25.00 per hour 20.00 per hour 17.00 Der hour 40.00 per hour. Cost + 5 percent 300.00 per day .18 per mile + direct co! ..15 cents per square.foo- At Cost At Cost At Cost The Owner agrees to limit the Design Professional's liability to the Owner and to all construction Contractors and Subcontractors on the project, due to the Design Professional's professional negligent acts, errors, or omissions, such that,the total aggregate liability of each Design Professional to all those named shall not exceed $50,000 or the Design Professional's total fee for services rendered on this project, whichever is greater. 1129 MARSH STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401 (805) 543 -1291 r RESOLUTION NO. 4801 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4580 (1981 Series) TO INCREASE THE MONTHLY SALARY OF THE COMMUNITY, DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. WHEREAS, on August 18, 1981, the council adopted Resolution No. 4580 (1981 Series), entitled "A Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo Establishing Salaries and Benefits for Certain Management Personnel and Superceding Previous Resolutions in Conflict," copy attached; and WHEREAS, the City Administrative Officer desires to amend that resolution to increase the salary of the Community Development Director as set out therein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .1 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows; SECTION A. Section 2 of Article I of Resolution 4580 (1981 Series) hereby is amended to increase the Community Development Director salary ($3,000 /month) to $3,200 /month, effective May 17, 1982. SECTION B. In all other respects Resolution 4580 (1981), as amended,, shalh ,_remain unchanged and in full force and effect, On motion of Councilman Griffin , seconded by Councilman Settle , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20 day of .April, 1982. ATTEST: City lerk Pamela V es R 4801 Resolution No. 4801 L )'82 Series) Page 2 APPROVED: O City Administ =ative Offi er City Attorney Ff'ftnc'LT`b'Trrc tor Personnel Director 0, _ REb6LUTIO1N.NO. 4580 (1981 Series)J A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY_ OF SAN LUIS OBISPO _ ESTABLISHING SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN iLMAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: ARTICLE I Salary Provisions Employees covered by this resolution shall be paid at the monthly salaries listed below effective July 1, 1981: 1. Council appointed employees Revised City Administrator $3,895:84 12 -81' City Attorney $31500 32700.,00 1 -82 City Clerk 1,950 2. City Administrative Officer appointed City Engineer $2,750 Director of Community Development 3,000 Director of Public Services 3,300 Director of Recreation 2,400 Finance Director 2,900 Fire Chief 3,150 3,350 3 -15 Personnel Director 2,200 Police Chief 3,500 Assistant City Attorney /Assistant to the Administrator 2,200 ARTICLE II Benefits Section A Medical Insurance For medical insurance the city agrees to contribute an amount equal to the cost of providing medical insurance for management employees and their dependents. Such contribution shall be spent first on employee coverage under an approved medical insurance plan and, second on dependent coverage. The-city reserves R 4580 i PI the right to choose the method of insuring and funding the benefit. �.s Section B Eye Care !^ The city agrees to contribute an amount equal to the cost of providing an approved eye care insurance plan for management employees and their dependents. Section C Dental Plan The city agrees to contribute an amount equal to the cost of providing an approved dental insurance plan for management employees and their dependents. Section D Unexpended Fringe Benefit The city shall pay to each management employee as soon as practicable prior to December 31, an annual lump sum payment (subject to appropriate taxation) for the difference between the amounts provided under Sections A through C above, and any lesser sum expended by the employee for medical, eye care, and dental coverage for the period of July 1, 1981, through December 31, 1981. Each employee shall be required to carry a minimum of medical, eye care, and dental insurance for self. Section E Life and Disabilitv The city shall provide the following special insurance benefits: 1. Long -term disability insurance providing 60% of gross salary to age 65 for any sickness or accident after a 90 -day waiting period. 2. $50,000 term life insurance including accidental death and dismemberment. 3. One -half of employee's health insurance premium paid for retired employees who elect to remain members of the city's group health plan. Section F Retirement The city agrees to provide the Public Employees' Retirement System's 2% -2- at age-60 plan to all eligible employees-including-the amendment-permitting, - conversion of unused sick leave to additional retirement credit, the 1-959 survivor's benefit and one year final compensation. The police and fire chiefs shall receive the same retirement benefits as sworn personnel in their department. The city further agrees to implement a plan whereby the city will pay the employee's current contribution (percentage of salary effective 7 -1 -81) on behalf of the employee to P.E.R.S. These amounts paid by the city are employee contributions and are paid by the city to satisfy the employee's obligation to contribute the current percentage of salary to P.E.R.S. An employee has no option to receive the contributed amounts directly instead of having them paid by the city to P.E.R.S. on behalf of the employee. It is further understood and agreed that the payment of the employee's P.E.R:S. contribution is made subject to I.R.S. approval and reporting procedures. Section G Vacation Vacation leave is governed by Section 2708.7 of the Municipal Code except that it may be taken after the completion of the sixth calendar month of service since the benefit date. Vacation leave shall be accrued as earned each payroll period up to a maximum of twice the annual accrual rate. However, if the City Administrator determines that a management employee has been unable to take vacation due to the press of city business; the City Administrator may increase the accrual limits or of the excess accumulation up to a vacation leave the City Administra administrative leave to department purposes. The City Attorney shall per year.. once annually authorize payment for one -half maximum of five (5) days. In ad6ition to for may grant up to five (5) days of heads f-or special training or recuperation receive seventeen (17) days paid vacation -3- j Section H Holidays _ The twelve (12) holidays as provided by M.O.U. for the general employees' association shall apply to management personnel. Section I Sick Leave Sick leave is governed by Section 2703.5 of_the Municipal Code. An employee may take up to two (2) days per year of sick leave if required to be away from the job to personally care for a member of his /her immediate family as defined in Section 2708.5. This may be extended to five (5) days per year -if the family member is part of the employee's household, and to seven (7) days if a household family member is hospitalized and the employee submits written verification of such hospitalization. upon termination of employment by death or retirement, a percentage of the dollar value of the employee's accumulated sick leave will be paid to the employee, or the designated beneficiary or beneficiaries according to the following schedule: (A) Death - 25% (B) Retirement and actual commencement of PERS benefits: (1) After ten (10) years of continuous employment - 10% (2) After twenty (20) years of continuous employment - 15% Section J Workers' Compensation Leave An employee who is absent from duty because of on- the -job injury in accordance with the state workers' compensation law and is not eligible for disability payments under Labor Code Section 4850 shall be paid the difference between his base salary and the amount provided by workers' compensation law during the first ninety (90) business days of such temporary disa'�ility absence. Eligibility for workers' compensation leave requires an open workers' compensation claim. -4- Section K Vehicle Assignment For those management personnel who require the use of an automobile on a regular 24 -hour basis to perform their normal duties, the city will, at city option, provide a city vehicle or an appropriate allowance for the employee's use of a personal automobile. The use of a personal automobile for city business beyond the three - county area (San Luis Obispo, Monterey and Santa Barbara) will be eligible for mileage reimbursement in accordance with standard city policy. On motion of Councilman Bond seconded by Councilman Dunin , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Bond, Dunin, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Settle the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of August , 1981. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Pamela Voges r; A�L�/ City Administrativ6 fficer City /Atto rinance erector 11_1_ I Personnel Director -_ ,p�sonne/ Toh� doss 1 \1 RESOLUTION NO. 4800 (1982 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE ATTACHED TRAFFIC ORDERS. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The attached traffic work orders for the period of January 1, 1982 through March 31, 1982 are approved. On.motion of Councilman Griffin seconded by Councilman Settle and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Dunin the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of April 1 1982. ATTEST: 4 20ft S,/, IIAO�us CITY CLERK P LA V ES ity En 'veer R 4800 -ri le" Y, TRAfFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 3 -23 -82 COMPLETED: � ,r-�o� LOCATION: Santa Rosa Street, North of Buchon Street , REQUESTED BY: Senior Citizens Center Allan G. Tilton, Engineering Assistant, Traffic DESCRIPTION: Paint one additional space -Blue - Handicapped / n f..., s +.7 ice•? {s1j,T- .:.1..- ,�5.k... t .nrlla,.:dJi%r.�..i,yL �.R �1:.� -Ga. ,.�1., � _ 1 �wyr- ' - X. f . CONCUR: Wayne A. Peterson City Engineer ACT: j1w �� I.• Y� : SRS' X1t;n'C. Tilton ton Engineering Assistant - Traffic q D'RA�IUU] ")l tlel L. rG.?il M F ,a.']®RAtl0UURI Y1 1 MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM March 17, 1982 Z ty 0 - �. F ,c m onspo PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 321 . San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 • 805/541 -1000 TO: John Hawley �W FROM: Allan G. Tilton' SUBJECT: Handicapped Parking In reply refer to: 147:AGT A request has been made by the Senior Citizens Center located on Santa Rosa Street north of Buchon Street, for one additional handicapped parking space. I have reviewed this location based upon their request. There is one handicapped parking space located as shown on the attached map. Because of the higher than average concentration of elderly at this A, location, and the percentage of disabled among this group, an extra handicapped space is appropriate. Attachment - Map Traffic Work Order AGT:jlw i I Setllon C�t�e�is �e�tte� Mr. Wayne Peterson Box 321 San Luis Obispo, Ca 93406 Dear Mr. Peterson: I ,r_TELEPHONE: 544.2662 1445 SANTA ROSA STREET e{� y 5 1982 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFONIA 93401 March 9, 1982 Several requests have been made to the Senior Citizens Center to provide one additional "handicapped" parking space for the disabled persons' cars. 'The ideal location is on Santa Hosa.Street just North of the present reserved handicapped parking space which is near an access ramp, making it easier to unload wheel- chairs. The extra space set apart for disabled persons will be an added benefit without greatly reducing the parking space for others. Sincerely, AM /sh Art Mosher, Pres. Jav C54ohly)M" AISL T ARL I TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 3 -9 -82 LOCATION: COMPLETED: p��- -��_�_ Chorro Street, south of Monterey Street (900 Block) REQUESTED BY: Allan G. Tilton Engineering Assistant, Traffic DESCRIPTION: Paint existing taxi zone green with 30 minute stencil install 30 minute parking meter on existing post. b V r- R oYQ, TA-x1 zion� I N Sri L t. 3 p iYl I n p�r}Uny SPac� F Concur: -ne A. Peterson City Engineer J} TRAFFIC ORDER FORM roll DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES,: 3 -5 -82 COMPLETED: CONCUR:��.�.._ \ i' Wayne A. Peterson Allan G. Tilton City Engineer Engineering Assistant, Traffic AGT:jI LOCATION: Pismo .Street 50' east of High Street REQUESTED BY: Allan G. Tilton Engineering Assistant, Traffic DESCRIPTION: Paint curb red as shown on the sketch below. l j L I� CONCUR:��.�.._ \ i' Wayne A. Peterson Allan G. Tilton City Engineer Engineering Assistant, Traffic AGT:jI I TRAFFIC ORDER FORM Oak I DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 3 -3 -82 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Montalban Street West of Santa Rosa REQUESTED BY: Allan G. Tilton, Engineering Assistant - Traffic DESCRIPTION: Paint 40 feet of curb green with 30 minute parking indication on the North side of the street. CONCUR: City Engineer ACT•.I.1 w a m Mom too /64„ Engineering Assistant, Traffic a TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 3-3-82 COMPLETED: 3. _t;?� - p, ; LOCATION: CA1 e_y �L West of Santa Rosa Street between Marsh and Higuera SE'reet REQUESTED BY: Allan G. Tilton Engineering Assistant/Traffic DESCRIPTION Alt %V do Remove 2 No Parking Between Sign gns si f e Install -- 2 No Parking Anytime R-28 3 No Parking Anytime R-26 y CONCUR: 417 -- W. A. Peterson City Eng4,- 7 /NSTA4C f _-Z 8 eo A16�v Past 4F Allan G. Tilton Engineering Assistant - Traffic TRAFFIC ORDER FOR14 i DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 -28 -82 COMPLETED:.. LOCATION: Grand Avenue at McCollum Street and Hays Street REQUESTED BY: W. Peterson DESCRIPTION: Paint 35 feet of red curb, 20 feet of red curb and add 20 feet red curb as illustrated on the aerial photo attached. Attachment i Wad yne A. Peterson City ?ngineer de WAP:jlw cr-,�i-% War.7LIVA MCC tt.. CIO lu 10 It I IS rot uj cc 231%-1 MA VA I'VE F'ZnTAN TRAFFIC ORDER FORM s WAP:;jlw 1A DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1- 27 -82 COMPLETED: c;Z , 3 —9 LOCATION: 1051 1/2 Buchon Street REQUESTED BY: Mr.. Robert L. Davidson (resident at above location) DESCRIPTION: Please paint three feet of red curbing on both sides of driveway at the address above. ,Wayne A. Peterson City Engineer JI TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1-25-82 COMPLETER: 1--.6 LOCATION: Johnson Avenue at Buchon Street REQUESTED B7: Dave Romero Director,. Public Services DESCRIPTION: Paint "NO LEFT TURN" on Johnson at Buchon BUCHOIN CONCUR: W;Iyne A. Peterson (.:il:v En),,incer RAG: j 1w r J01INSON TURN LEFT NO Richard A. Gordon Engineering Associad- Traffic TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES:1-25-82 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Foothill Blvd. at City Limits REQUESTED BY: California Highway Patrol DESCRIPTION: Install R3 sign "End 40 MPH" at City Limit on Foothill Blvd. for westbound traffic. CONCUR: W-'iyne A. Peterson City Engineer RAG: -j 114 w Richard A. Cordon /I Engineering Associate ate Traffic ME W TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 -25 -82 COMPLETED:. - 0 LOCATION: Buchon at Osos , Broad, Santa Rosa, and High Streets REQUESTED BY: Wayne Peterson, City Engineer DESCRIPTION: Paint arrow for westbound traffic as indicated on the sketch below. Higil Osos I Broad Santa'Rosa CONCUR: 'k'ayne�A Peterson City Engineer RAG:jIw BUCHON Richard A.'Gordon- .Engineering.Associate - Traffic TRAFFIC ORDER ORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1-20-82 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Calle Joaquin and Madonna Road REQUESTED BY: Burt Waldron - Citizen DESCRIPTION: Paint double yellow center line for 100 feet on Calle Joaquin from Madonna Road as indicated on the sketch below. Aak C o'N 1: U K: U;iyne A. Peterson City Engineer RAG: j I w Lchard A. Gordon,; Engineering; Assoi`iaLe TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 -19 -82 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Johnson Avenue at Sydney Street REQUESTED BY: Art Hird - Public Services Dept. DESCRIPTION: Extend existing red zone 25 feet tic r jcyvso�tr' �+� Concur: � ,� •- Wayne Peterson Richard A. G-ori on City Engineer Engineering A sociate - Traffic ithU: j l�•� wiz TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES:. 1 -18 -82 COMPLETED:. 02 — o2 LOCATION: Johnson at Buchon Street REQUESTED BY: Wayne Peterson, City Engineer DESCRIPTION: Instal]_ "NO LEFT TURN" sign R 17 (30inch x 30 inch) BUCHON STREET JOHNSON AVENUE INSTALL d" (30"x30" �f R 17 r" No Left Turn CONCUR__,_ i � !f� ,/y�/�� r,,,, lJa ne i}eterson k hard A. Gordon City Engineer Engineering Associate — Traffic RAC,: j i�r J TRAFFIC ORDER FORM w DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 -15 =82 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Buchon Street at High Street REQUESTED BY: R. A. Gordon DESCRIPTION: Install stoP sign R1 4 LL on Buchon for High Street , n �0 Concur: o'llayne Peterson Richard A. Go don City Engineer Engineering Associate - Traffic RAG:jlw i01` ld I I e TrlA llin nn 11111 In nu DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 -12 -82 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Sunset Nursery - E1ks.Lane REQUESTED BY: Art Hird - Public .Services DESCRIPTION:. Install "NO PARKING ANYTIME" right arrow and left arrow as indicated on the sketch below (each end of curbed section). N NPAT NPAT R28 R28 Sunset Nursery / DW DW Elks Lane CONCUR: -- •..._ �;- -,___. _. %" �� , Wayn A. Peterson, Richard A. Gordon City Engineer Engineering Associate - Traffic RAG: jlw W11.1% 6 TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 1/4/82 COMPLETED:.. p2 - - LOCATION: Los Osos Valley Road from Descanso to city limits REQUESTED BY: San Luis Obispo Police Department DESCRIPTION: Install 4 inch plastic y line to solid and form a A tutal of 1,207 feet of 71 spaces x 17 ft. = 120 ellow tape to change existing skip dash double yellow centerline. 4 inch yellow tape will be required 7 Concur: 'Wayne & Peterson Richard A. Gordon City Engineer Engineering Associate, Traffic RAG::) l.w i j TRAI -FIC ORDER FORM I DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 12-30 -81 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Buchon Street from High Street to Johnson Avenue REQUESTED BY: City Council DESCRIPTION: Change from "One -Way" street to "Two -Way" street: see blueline print attached. A. B. C. D. E. Att Paint existing white C/L yellow. Remove 22 painted arrows. Remove 44 one -way signs R 10 mounted back -to -back. Remove 14 RIO one -way signs on pipe standards with other signs or on signal standards. Paint (2) "STOP bars as indicated: Remove no left turn and no right turn signs. achment - Blueline Print Concur: U e t_� 4Ja A. Peterson Richard A. Gordon City Engineer Engineering Associate - Traffic RAG: jIw o ra T; LM MEMORANDUM December 31, 1981 NEWS RELEASE PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 321 - San Luis Obkpo, CA 93406 805/541-1000 CONTACT: Wayne Peterson, City Engineer Buchon Street to become two-way Buchon Street in San Luis Obispo, now a one-way street, will become two-way on January 15, 1982. The City Council decided to follow the suggestion of the Old Town Neighborhood Association and try two-way traffic on the street for a six-month test. City planners believe two-way flow will be more in character with the neighborhood and still adequately handle traffic. The change is scheduled to take place at 12 noon, January 15, 1982. r_7 N TRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN 1*0 PUBLIC SERVICES: 12-30-81 COMPLETED: • LOCATION: Grand Avenue at Hays Street REQUESTED BY: Art 11i rd DESCRIPTION: Add 27 feet of red curb as illustrated below for a Bus Stop. Paint Red HAYS STREET Existing n»lrf lei I CUNCUR: Wfi'yne- A. Peieir's—on City Engincer ;tAG: J 1 w 6 GRAND AVENUE lelol� k Ti -hard A. —G-o' 9rd o3 Engineering Associate - Traffic TRAFFIC ORDLR.FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 12 -24 -81 COMPLETED: J — LOCATION: Foothill Blvd. at Carpenter Street. REQUESTED BY: Petition of Residents on Foothill Blvd. (See attached) DESCRIPTION: Install W53 "NOT A.THROUGH STREET" signs as indicated on attached map. Attachments - 2 CONCUR:._ _ ;� ••� /�� Way Peterson Richard A. Gordon City ngineer Engineering Associate - Traffic RAG: jIw 0 e DEC 2 Tr:1ffi.r Committee C i. ty o f E,a n Luis Obispo :an l,uis Obispo, CA 93401 15 uecembcr_1.981, '.le, the undersigned residents of the north end of Foothill, hr.reby petition the City of San Luis Obj.c,po to resolve the Lr: ffi.c : ;i. /;n problem at the junction of Foothill and Cra,udall wh:ich confusos and /or misdirect.: traffic into the AC;Id end tion o f Foothi11. Drivers of large trucks and trailers, buses, and an i.nordin;iLe amount of private vehicles either miss completely or are con - fused by the "Dead Gnd" signs at the Foothill- Crandall. inter - r,ection. Ohe sign is locatedon the south side of Foothill at a curve hence is on the blind side of the driver. Furthermore, it is before the intersection and has become,twisted to imply that it is referring to Crandall. ';!e sul;l;est the relocation of the "Dead End" sign c ;o that it j:; back to back with the Foothill '!Stop" sign, or perh.rip:, better located along the north curb of Foothill approximately 50' from the intersection. lle further recommend the re- evaluation of the Crandall "Plot 'through Street" sign which was installed at the time Cal Poly Aft temporarily closed the Crandall entrance to the campus. Petition circulated by: D ::vid B. Thomson 133 Foothill Blvd San Buis Obispo, C:4 5114 -8466 i2 934o1 l3S"� `ao� -h,ll �l�cQ ZZ ,4 ' v O123 0 � 0— 0 2m*- F11 LlL C 1qI , ; .- EV m 113 yQ _J D 0 ,om T 0 O h CARPE_ NTER r/A/ Z- Z- W53 9034 Eiwl �5;13]Ell NOT A, 4Cg THROUGH STREET 1'0 licY: Use the %V-�53 sign to inclicalct n strect or CL11-d0,S;kC. 'I-IjjS sijji is also j[%,;Ljl:jl)I N0'• g A 1-1111MR;1I It()/%I) ;is Location: Fre•t fWar Ilit, cii1raiwt, therclo. in 111t• stzlll(l;kl-(l I)OsiliOli on the right. 0 0 O O �A I �G n ; f. o1 i I' I: • TRAFFIC ORDER FORM ' 1 . 516N C0MPLr&7F.D DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC. SERVICES: 12 -24 -81 COMPLETED: ST/�Tr o a c> LOCATION: AJ Z >6 . Marsh Street at Higuera Street & Archer REQUESTED BY: San Luis Obispo Police Department DESCRIPTION: Paint S inch solid line 100 feet and.install ceramic markers, as indicated on the attached map. Attachment - map CONCUR. 4Jayne A. Peterson ichard A. Gordon/ City Engineer Engineering Associate - Traffic RAG: jlw O j uj cc C� •f,`�' Ira lo It !I j� '' :9,k }��' °PE. 'ti1.::W...• tML Ivy I, ra �.,, It i r ILI Is' pj� - - All 14. -'n LIJ LLJ Am CC cz Uj LL. Lt. Cc 1 u .. 4 Uj cc UL. Ilk tki ., 'l tl111lu11 ' „ �I�I� POLICE DEPARTMENT yr' i ;I,II�II,` ,I, ,I it 575 Santa Rosa /Post Office Box 1328 - San Luis Obispo. Ca 93406•- 805/544 -5151 is. �'i, . "'' ,'� I'!' Bruce LaHargoue DATE Dec 5, 1981 Egg t��ulaL�a.a.:��lvl� TO FROM Tim J. Hedges SUBJECT City Sign Blocking Traffic Vision On 120581/0900hrs, an employee at Marsh Street Union told me that they have had numerous customers comment on the new wood "San Luis Obispo" sign which is 'next to the fountain at Iliguera and Marsh. The sign is appearantly blocking the vision of those turning off of Higuera and onto Marsh with the intention of crossing over marsh to the Union Station. In taking the turn myself, it is a slight problem in seeing traffic either coming off the Highway or from the 300bk of Higuera. As that turning lane enters into its own lane on Marsh St., it is . not much of a problem. Further, other type of vehicle may have more of a problem due to it being higher or lower. However,'if a driver wishes to immediately change lanes for some reason, the -sign may interfer. Perhaps the sign could be lowered and /or relocated to prevent any further conflicts prevented. IJU,AJ Res, lly tted; Tim J. Hedges �a_ . Police Officer / nl�N 7 �� �-"k". MEMORANDUM >ti i TRAFFIC ORDER FO DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 12 -15 -81 LOCATION: Pismo Street at Garden REQUESTED BY: Dr. H. R. Fisher COMPLETED: �'� �—O of. DESCRIPTION: Paint 30 Minute Green Zone as indicated on the drawing below. Pismo Street 221 1. Pt.. Green 30 Min. Zone L o N CONCUR. Wayne A. Peterson "ZA.Gorpn City Engineer Engineering Associate. - Traffic RAG: jlw IRAFFIC ORDER FORM DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES:12 -8 -81 LOCATION: COMPLETED: /, //� O � . Madonna Road -South side from Calle Joaquin to Oceanaire °.,_QUESTED BY: San Luis Obispo Police Department DESCRIPTION: Post N /P.A.T. R -26 signs on the South side of Madonna Road from Calle Joaquin to Oceanaire at intervals of 250' + to 300' +. Concur: 4Jayne A. Peterson Richard Gordon City Engineer Engineering Asso iate - Traffic i RAG:jlw I� 11,Ir 1 LUIS Ub- C OUdt-y ROOM Af01 COURTHOUSE ANNEX . SAN LUIS OBISPO._ CALIFORNIA GEORGE C. PROTOPAPAS County Engineer CLINI'ON MILNE DF.PUIYCOUNTY ENGINEER GUY FREWITT SRECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATOR December 3,1981 City of San Luis Obispo Public Services Department P. 0. Box. 321 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Attention Richard A. Gordon File: DEC U 4 1981 Traffic General Subject: No Parking -- Madonna Road Gentlemen: COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 93408 . ( 805 ) 549.5252 ROAD'. TRANSPORTATICI, FLOOD CONTROL. WATER CONSERVATICI� .SURVEYOR SPECIAL DISTRICT: In reply to your inquiry of November 24, 1981 the R -26 signing should be installed and maintained by the City, ® inasmuch as the section of road is maintained under an agreement with San Luis Obispo County. We feel it would not be feasible to split responsibility for, sign maintenance between the two agencies. Sincerely, GEORGE C. PROTOPAPAS County Engineer DOUG SHEFFER Assistant Traffic Engineer DS /nt � J 1RAFFIC ORULIZ FORM • DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 11 -25 -81 COMPLETED: LOCATION: Madonna Road North Side from Calle Joaquin to Oceanaire REQUESTED BY: San Luis Obispo Police Department DESCRIPTION: Post N.P.A.T R -26 signs on the North side of Madonna Road from Calle Joaquin to Oceanaire at intervals of 250' ± to 300'+ .• Richard A. Gedon Engineering Associate, Traffic Concar -: Wayne A. Peterson City Engineer RAG:jlw 11 Im f +I:C I J. 1RAf f IC ORULIZ FORM DATE TAKEN 10 PUBLIC SERVICES: 11 -11 -81 COMPLETED'. LOCATION: Monterey Street.near Santa Rosa Street REQUESTED 8Y: Dave Romero Wayne Peterson OLS,;RIPTION: Remove parking place as indicated in drawing below: RAG: jIw DW MONTEREY STREET Extend Red Curb 25' 0 32' 17' Red DW METER #1017 & POST REMOVE PARKING PLACE 15' Red Y - R. A. ord Engineering Associate.- Traffic S AN T, ROSA STREE 1 11 I� ;I j ,I '1 t� I� II , I I J �• ' I its it it ff t i)AH-: TAKEN TH rrnri,ic SERVI-CiS:11 -11 -81 CON PI, i:rr:n: Monterey between Santa Rosa Steet & Osos Street rI.-(p1ri:1) BY: D. Romero /W. Peterson. UI•SCR I PT I.ON : Remove existing double. yellow center line and repaint as indicated on the attached aerial print. Attachment - Aerial. Print Richard A. Gordbn Engineering Assoc ate - Traffic RAG:jlw r A A I f n 1� LLJ tu 0 cc 0 Z alt}v �' I t-- LU in cc DO Q) 10.1 C:) lit cc oa 9 -0 Lo 0 4 cr WX VG IG LU ����tllliNI�WIIIII�III ® Ilulll 1" April - DATE: I� ®ul� C� o san lugs oBispo April 20, 1982 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM m FROM: Wayne A. Peterson, City Engineer - SUBJECT: Traffic Work Orders for Period of January l-, 1982 through March 31, 1982 CAO RECOMMENDATION: Pass Resolution Approving Traffic Work Orders for Period of January 1, 1982 Through March 31, 19827 BACKGROUND: The City Engineer has, over the'past -three (3) months, issued work orders for the installation of signs, curb markings and pavement markings. These minor changes have been "implemented in an effort to increase the safety and operation of the city street system. It has been the Council's policy in the past to accept this report on a quarterly basis. This report attempts to satisfy this past policy. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor implementation costs associated with street maintenance. .RECOMMENDATION: Pass resolution approving traffic work orders for period of January 1, 1982 through March 31, 1982. t Attachments - Completed Traffic Work Orders (work orders available in Council_ office 1/1/82 - 3/1/82 for inspect -ion) WAP•AGT:jlw c.c. David W. Romero /(w /out attach) C -3 -I