HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/02/1986 Item C4 - Consider Establishing 2606 ElCerrito Dr as Excess Property and Agreement of Sale to Jeffreey and Insong Edwards/{r lt
lrlnilillilillllllillljlllllllllllll crry o[ san Lu,fficCIulvGIL s oBrspo
FIEPOFIT
MEETING DATE:Dec. 2, I9SJ6trww
Kenny
neer
FFOM:
s ervi s ici
Gerald W
Civi 1
Prepared by:
Public Works Director
David F. Romero lfayne A. Peters
A) Conslderation of a Resolution Establishing Two City Lots as Excess
Property at 26A6 EI Cerrlto Dr.; and
B) Consideration of an Agreement with Jeffrey and Insong Ed.wards Regarding
Purchase of Excess Citv Pronertv at 26A6 E1 Cerr"ito Driwe-
SUBJECT
A) Adopt Resolution Declaring Lots as Excess Property; and
B) Adopt Resolution Approving Agreement with Jeffrey and fnsong Edwards.
CAO HEGOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND.
The subject lots were deeded to the City of San Luis Oblspo in conjunction with
the subdivision of a portion of the Goldtree Vineyard Tract Ln 1967 by Elmer
Smith. Because of the configuration of the cu}*de-sac and of the need for
providing access to the adjacent Goldtree Vineyard lots 17 and 14, the City
required the subdivider to deed the subject parcels 5 and 6 of Mlnor
Subdivision 67-A79, in order to control the access to the adjacent parcels and
to provide for relmbursement to the developer for an equitable share of the
costs of the land and other public improvements serving these parcels (see
attached Subdivision Agreement). The reimbursement requirement terminated
January 1, 197A. Therefore no reimbursement is due the originaL subdivi.der,
hovever normal water frontage and. acreage charges are due, per city ordinance.
These will be collected upon further subdivision or prior to issuance of
permits, whichever comes first.
In accordance with the cityts Property Management Manual' the Planning
Commission must make a determination that sale of surplus city property is in
conformity vith the general p1an. This vas determined on June 11, 19A6. The
Property Managenent Manual further requlres an appraisal of the property to
determine market value. This has been done under a contract with Schenberger,
Taylor, McOormick and Jecker, to be S5,AAa,ao. These two remnant lots only
have value if incorporated lnto the adjacent property. Ihese two lots are
encumbered by storm drainage facilities and the sale of the property is
contingent upon acquisition of the adjacent property by Edwards, and upon
recordation of a map combining these parcels with the adjacent parcels. The
applicant has initiated a minor subdivision to incorporate these parcels under
Minor Subdivislon 86*Q74. A condition of the subdlvislon wiLL provlde for
d.rainage easements as necessary to maintain the drainage devices. TentatLve
map approval is sc'heduled for November 21, 1986, by the Community Development
Director.
The Property Management Manual indicates the first right of refusal by the
Housing Authority, county, regional and state agencies, etc. This is not
appropriate in this case. The manual further indicates that the City Clerk
should advertise for RFP's or invitation to bid on the properties. Ihis is
also not appropriate in this case.
&/
'l
Wru glji?LllXffifu oo FrEP.,Frr
ess Property - 26A6 El Cerrito Dr.
1 986Meeting of December 2,
Page Two.
The applicant has agreed to purchase the property for the appraised value.attached agreement is transmitted for Councll consideration and approval.sale of the property would occur in conjunction with approval of the finalparcel map.
ALTERNATIVES:
Optlon 1:Item A - Adopt resolution declaring lots as surplus property.
Item B - Adopt resolution approving agreement with Jeffrey and
fnsong Edwards. lhe primary advantage is that the city receives
revenue by seIIinC thq lots and increased tax revenue, and the
property owner is able to provide for lmproved access to public
s.treet. There are no apparent disadvantages.
Option 2:Determine these lots to be necessary to remain in city possession
and refuse the offer by the applicant. Thls does not appear to be a
logical conclusion, since the intent vas to incorporate these lots
with adjacent property
CONCURRENCES;
The City Attorney and Community Development Director concur with the
recommendation. No department has expressed any opposition.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution.declaring parcels 5 and 6 of Minor SubdivisLon 67-@79 to
be surplus city property.
Adopt resolution approving agreement with Jeffrey H. and Insong K. Edwards
for purchase of parcels 5 and 6 of Minor Subdivision SL 67-A79.
Attachments:
1 - Draft resolution declaring lots to be surplus
2 - Draft resolution approving agreement vlth Edwards
5 - Agreement
4 - Subdlvislon agreement with E1mer Smith
5 - Vicinity map
6 - Tentative parcel map no. 86-@7+
jk5/excess
bv
The
The
A
B