Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/12/2025 Item 4a, Ewer Planning Commission ADU amendments From: Emily Ewer < Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 4:28 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; McClish, Teresa <tmcclish@slocity.org> Cc: Carol Florence < Subject: Planning Commission ADU amendments This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hello Ethan and Teresa, We reviewed the sta? report and attachments for the Planning Commission’s consideration for the ADU and ULS amendments. As we have a few ADU projects in process, we have a keen interest in the proposed amendments and have two initial comments as below. We are available if you have any questions or would like to discuss further. We can also provide information about our projects as relevant case studies, if needed. 3.c. Design Standards iv. Accessory dwelling units that include the creation of new square footage shall be limited to sixteen feet in height. Up to one hundred fifty square feet of new square footage may be exempted from this requirement in connection to a conversion of existing upper floor square footage, but only as needed to accommodate ingress and egress. (a) In order to provide additional design options for accessory dwelling units, units that include the creation of new square footage can be constructed up to twenty-five feet in height if consistent with the setback standards provided in Article 2 of this title (Zones, Allowable Uses and Development and Design Standards). Comment: We would request consideration to amend the building height allowance to be consistent with the zoning height standards when the underlaying zone setback standards are utilized (this would include upper story setbacks, as applicable). Site development would continue to be consistent with zoning development envelope, but allow for greater design flexibility since ADU are now allowed in a broad range of zones. The 16-foot height limitation when utilizing the ADU setback standards would remain applicable. 4. Procedural Requirements c. Building permit applications involving the construction of new space or the alteration of existing space within an existing residential structure may be designed in such a manner as to facilitate the conversion to an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit. Said new construction or alterations to an existing single-family residential structure shall be consistent with the City’s objective design standards and any applicable zoning regulations. An accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit created through such a building permit application cannot be combined with the provisions of California Government Code Section 66323. Comment: I read the draft ordinance before I read the sta? report and could not identify the intent or application of the above statement. Without the explanation from the sta? report, the proposed “preemptive conversion” provision is not clear. We definitely support the streamlining of allowing attached ADU/JADUs in new construction that would otherwise be allowed as a conversation, but this language may benefit from additional wordsmithing. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Emily Ewer, AICP 1 O A S I S A S S O C I A T E S, I N C. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 3427 Miguelito Court, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Office: 805.541.4509 Direct: 805-548-1564 www.OASISASSOC.COM 2