HomeMy WebLinkAboutSloan Sakai Sample Comp Study Report
Total Compensation Study
Prepared for the
East Bay Municipal
Utility District
May 2017
Submitted by
Contact: Geoffrey Rothman
350 Sansome St. Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
T: (415) 516-8091
F: (415) 678-3838
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1
I.........PAY POLICY ........................................................................................................................1
A. THE TRIAD OFCOMPENSATION OBJECTIVES ...............................................1
B. ELEMENTS OF A PAY POLICY ...........................................................................2
II.......DEFINING THE SURVEY UNIVERSE ...............................................................................3
A. HISTORIC SURVEY UNIVERSE ................................................................................3
B. THE RATIONAL FACTOR APPROACH TO SELECTING A SURVEY
UNIVERSE………………………………………………………………………...…..4
C. THE FILTER STRATEGY .............................................................................................6
D. PR IMARY SORT– EMPLOYEE AND APPLICANT
RESIDENCE………………………………………………………………………......6
E. SECONDARY SORT – DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS
AND COMMUNITY WEALTH……………………………………………………....6
III.......COMPARATIVE CRITERIA – DATA POINT DESCRIPTIONS AND TABLES ............7
IV ......RESIDENCE INFORMATION ..........................................................................................10
V........POPULAT ION S ORT ........................................................................................................17
VI......RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION ................................................................25
A. RECOMMENDED SURVEY UN IVERSE ...........................................................25
VII….RECOMMENDED EMPLOYERS .....................................................................................26
VIII…TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY ...............................................................................27
A. OVERVIEW OF SURVEY METHODOLOGY……………….….…………….27
B. SUMMARY OF RESULTS…………………..…………………………………29
C. SUMMARY TABLE OF OUTCOMES ................................................................30
D. DETAILED REPORTS OF CLASSIFICATION ..................................................32
ATTACHMENTS
Accounting Technician .......................................................................................... 33
Admin Clerk...........................................................................................................34
Associate Civil Engineer ........................................................................................35
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpenter ............................................................................................................... 36
Chemist II...............................................................................................................37
Construction Inspector .......................................................................................... 38
Customer Service Representative II......................................................................39
Electrical Technician… ........................................................................................40
Engineering Designer II ....................................................................................... .41
Environmental Health & Safety Specialist II ........................................................42
Facility Specialist II ............................................................................................. 43
Gardener II ........................................................................................................... 44
Heavy Equipment Mechanic ............................................................................... 45
Heavy Equipment Operator .................................................................................46
Instrument Technician .........................................................................................47
Janitor................................................................................................................... 48
Lab Technician II ................................................................................................ 49
Maintenance Machinist ....................................................................................... 50
Pipeline Welder III.............................................................................................. 51
Plant Maintenance Mechanic .............................................................................. 52
Sr Systems Programmer ...................................................................................... 53
Storekeeper II ...................................................................................................... 54
Survey Technician II ........................................................................................... 55
Water Distribution Operator SR ..........................................................................56
Water Distribution Plumber III ........................................................................... 57
Water Treatment Operator (Sr) ........................................................................... 58
Wastewater Plant Operator II..............................................................................59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
The East Ba y Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) conducts comparability studies in
conjunction with its collective bargaining and compensation management programs to evaluate
the competitiveness of its current compensation.
EBMUD determined that the survey universe established and utilized in prior surveys should be
reassessed and modified or confirmed as appropriate. To conduct this assessment, along with a
compensation survey, EBMUD retained compensation experts from Renne Sloan Holtzman
Sakai LLP, Public Management Group. This report presents the results of the firm’s analysis of
the surve y universe along with the results of the compensation survey.
The report is organized into the following major sections:
Introduction
Pay Polic y
The Surve y Universe
a. Criteria for selecting an appropriate surve y universe
b. Application of the criteria to a relevant group of cities and counties;
c. A recommended surve y universe
d. A recommended group of comparator agencies
Compensation Survey
a. Survey Methodology
b. Survey outcomes
I. PAY POLICY
A. The Triad of Compensation Objectives
Compensation programs are essential to the achievement of three key organizational objectives,
including:
Recruitment of qualified staff
Retention of experienced staff
Reward of longevity and acquisition of skills
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These three components form a triad of strategic compensation objectives.
An effective recruitment and staffing effort is, in large part, reliant on a competitive
compensation program in order to attract the best possible talent in the relevant recruitment
market.
The retention of highl y qualified personnel relies upon providing a total compensation package
that considers cost of living, is competitive with comparable emplo yers, and that provides
qualit y of life improvements.
B. Elements of a Pay Policy
Compensation goals are achieved through specific organizational programs and strategies,
including the adoption of a pa y polic y. T ypicall y, a pa y polic y addresses and defines:
• The geo-economic area in which the surve ying employer competes for qualified talent
• The comparable organizations within that geo-economic framework to be utilized for
survey purposes
• The data points or elements of compensation (e.g. base pay, benefits, pension)that are
collected and compared to determine competitiveness
• The job classes to be surveyed
• The competitive position that the employer wishes to maintain and/or achieve amongst
other surveyed employers
• The structure of the pay plan, including the width of the pay range, and number of pay
steps in each range
• The manner and extent to which longevity, performance and special skills are recognized
• The allocation of labor costs between base pay, incentives, benefits and pension
• The allocation of compensation between general entitlements and various incentives
Comparabilit y surve ys are the principal instrument by which to produce objective and verifiable
information that describes market competitiveness. Surveys are conducted in order to determine
whether the surveying employer is achieving its pay polic y, and to identify areas where
adjustments may be appropriate.
3
II. DEFINING THE SURVEY UNIVERSE
Methodology:
The first step in the process of developing an appropriate surve y universe is to identify rational
and objective criteria b y which to assess potential comparator geo-economic areas and
employers within those areas. Following that, the criteria are applied to create a variety of
survey universes.
In identif ying the recom mended surve y universe, the consultant relied on a series of filters or
“sorts”. The first establishes a geo-economic area for further refinement. This sort utilizes
residency information for employees and applicants to establish a labor market consistent with
the EBMUD’s recruitment and retention experience. The second sort takes most appropriate
government organizational areas – in this case, counties - and attempts to reduce the number to a
rational survey universe using demographic and social characteristics as well as community
wealth data.
A. Historic Survey Universe
One potential factor in defining a survey universe is the list of employers used in recent salary
surveys. A surve y conducted in 2012 included thirty-one (31) employers. Notably, the survey
universe included geo-political areas from around the state, and not limited to the recruitment
and residence areas for current employees and job seekers, and not limited to utility districts
providing services similar to EBMUD. Indeed, the survey universe mixed local government
with a variet y of special districts, including transportation as well as utilities. Employers from
the 2012 survey included:
Alameda County Water District
Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
City & County of San Francisco
City of Berkeley
City of Concord
City of Hayward
City of Oakland
City of Pleasanton
City of Sunnyvale
City of Vallejo
Contra Costa Water District
4
County of Alameda
County of Contra Costa
County of San Mateo
County of Santa Clara
Dublin San Ramon Service District
East Bay Regional Parks
Eastern Municipal Water District
Inland Empire Utility Agency
Los Angeles County Sanitary District
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
Marin Municipal Water District
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Orange County Sanitation District
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
San Diego County Water Authority
Santa Clara Valley Water District
State of California
Union Sanitary District
Vallejo Sanitation District
B. The Rational Factor Approach to Selecting a Survey Universe
1. Overview
The following provides a review of the rational selection criteria and a strategy b y which to
identify emplo yers who are most like EBMUD, and most appropriate for comparability
surveys for EBMUD. Thi s approach is known as a rational or data-based strategy. It is
employed b y numerous compensation surve y consultants, and has been recognized as a sound
strategy b y fact finders and arbitrators.
5
This rational strategy is in contrast to both the “negotiated” surve y universe and the “cherry
picking” approach. Both strategies ma y have influenced EBMUD’s large historical universes.
In the “cherr y picking” approach, and often in the “negotiated” universe approach, both
parties select employers who are most likel y to confirm their collective bargaining objectives.
The result is often rather curious, often revealing both self-interest, and the effect of
compromise.
The rational approach involves the identification of geo-economic areas in which to
identify organizations which share similar characteristics. The survey employers should
consist of organizations that provide similar services, and exhibit other similar
organizational characteristics. While no two employers are precisel y identical, we believe
that the factors described below are most likely to produce the most appropriate survey
universe.
Finally, in applying a rational strategy, it is essential that the application of parameters for
the tertiar y sort yield sufficient comparator organizations from which to draw significant
conclusions. Ideall y, a survey should have at least twelve, and ideally more comparators. A
ver y small number of comparators tends to yield samples which are simply too small to be
significant. While a very large universe tends to include fewer employers with similar
characteristics.
2. Form/Service Functions of Comparable Employers (Utility
Operators versus municipalities and other special districts)
As noted above, prior surveys utilized a cross section of comparator agencies. The single
common factor being that all comparators were in the public sector. For a variety of reasons
selecting comparable employers which are most similar to EBMUD may be most appropriate to
develop the most useful compensation information.
First, organizations which provide similar services tend to use similar classifications. So, for
instance classes such as Wastewater Operators, Plumbers, and meter related classes are much
less likely to be found in transit districts. Such gaps, especially when surve ying for some of the
most important classes or work, then require either work arounds to make up for the deficiencies
or leaving important questions unanswered. Neither option is desirable.
Secondl y, funding sources and the types of services provided var y considerably between special
districts and municipal government. Local governments typicall y provide safety services (police
and fire) along with important public health and social services programs. Their sources of
funding var y widel y, from fees to taxes and grants. While the demand for various services
strains limited revenues. These limits and demands are ultimatel y reflected in their pay policies.
Third, there is a greater likelihood that similar industry comparators will experience similar
trends in recruitment and retention and will adjust compensation accordingly in order to
remain competitive.
6
C. The Filter Strategy
The objective of defining an appropriate survey universe is to produce a rational group of
comparators that can generate useful information for assessing market competitiveness. The
initial challenge in this process involves defining an efficient and rational methodology to
narrow down the list of thousands of employers in California to those of particular relevance.
The most efficient means of selecting a rational surve y universe is a filter strategy.
At the outset, and consistent with the objective of using the compensation program to achieve
recruitment and retention objectives, the geographic area covering the majority of both employee
and applicant residences is identified. Within this recruitment and residence area, those cities
and/or counties which are most similar in population are identified. Finally, depending on the
number of employers remaining, a series of other rational criteria are applied to achieve an initial
list which is sufficient (both in number and in appropriateness) to constitute a useful and rational
survey universe.
D. Primary Sort – Employee and Applicant Residence
As noted above, two of the principal objectives of a compensation program involve the
recruitment of qualified candidates and the retention of a qualified workforce. Employee and
applicant residence information helps to define a group of geo-political areas to which other
criteria can be applied.
E. Secondary Sort – Demographic and Social Characteristics and Community
Wealth
1. Selection and Application of Data Points
There are three general categories of data points that are commonly used to determine
comparability for purposes of conducting studies among public organizations. These include:
• Demographic characteristics; and
• Community wealth.
In order to create more precision within the general categories, eight specific data points have
been selected:
• Demographic characteristics
Population
Median Age
Education Level
Crime Level
7
• Community wealth
Median Household Income
Median 2016 (October) Home Sales
Unemployment
Poverty Level
Each data point is considered representative of its categor y. For each data point, we have
identified the fourteen (14) counties within the representative geographic area, including
Alameda Count y, in which EBMUD has facilities and/or conducts work activities. The final
recommended rational universe includes those counties which appear like Alameda County
in the greatest number of instances.
III. COMPARATIVE CRITERIA – DATA POINT DESCRIPTIONS AND TABLES
The accompan ying tables sort the potential comparable counties in ascending or descending
order on each data point, and include Alameda County in each sort, also in relative order. From
this sort recommended surve y universes have been identified. The data points which form the
determinative criteria by which to measure similarity are discussed at greater length below.
A. Demographics and Social Characteristics
The size, structure and delivery s ystem of public services tend to be, in some large part,
a function of the size, age and educational level of the population that is serviced.
B. Population
As discussed above, population is the most direct and commonly accepted basis for
comparison, and often used as a prox y for comparability. Population offers guidance into the
level, variet y and complexity of services offered by a public agenc y. The size of the population
tends to correlate with the size and complexity of service providers.
C. Median Age
The age of the population has a strong influence on the type of services required and provided.
D. Educational Attainment Level
Education levels tend to correlate to income levels. Those with higher levels of education
t ypicall y have greater earning power, and realize higher levels of income.
E. Crime Level
Crime levels tend to provide indications of key issues such as the age of a service population,
wealth, education, unemployment and povert y.
8
F. Community Wealth and Cost of Living
Community wealth is an indicator both of the economic base in a community, closel y related to
the ability to pa y, and the type and level of government services required. Theoreticall y, a
wealthier communit y would be more likely to have a strong tax base, coupled with less demand
for public services.
Federal measure areas for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) provide a limited criterion for
measuring communit y wealth and cost of living between counties which are located near each
other. However, median home value and recent median home sales prices is often used as a
measure of relative cost of living, even among communities which are in close proximity to each
other.
Additional factors such as median household income, unemployment level and level of povert y
round out an anal ysis of cost of living and community wealth. These factors are considered in
more detail below.
G. Median Household Income
Income level tends to correspond to the cost of living in a particular area. The cost of housing,
food, transportation, clothing and related essentials tend to correspond to income or earnings. In
fact, income strongl y influences the demand side of the economic suppl y/demand equation.
Median household income measures the total income of a household, in contrast to per capita
income which may var y by the number of wage earners in a household.
H. Median Home Sales Prices
Especiall y in the current real estate market, the median home sales price provides an immediate
barometer of economic activity in a community, at least as it relates to what has become the
single most valuable asset for most families. Additionally, the value of property forms the basis
for a major source of local revenue. Because home prices have risen rapidly, this indicator tends
to be more current than median home values.
I. Unemployment Level
A strong indicator of the economic pulse of a community is the level of unemployment.
J. Families Below Poverty Level
The percent of families living below the povert y level tends to correspond inversel y to income
levels, and creates special demands on public services. The higher the income level, the fewer
impoverished families. The percent of families below the poverty level also tends to correspond
to public safet y issues, health, education, and related quality of life concerns Data Sources.
For the most part the data referenced in this report comes from well documented publicly
9
accessible sources, including the U.S. Census, the California Employment Development
Department, California Department of Finance, California Department of Justice, and
DataQuick. The U.S. Census was last conducted in 2010 and updated in 2014. Age and
demographic data is derived from the census.
Crime data is constructed from the FBI report of felony arrests b y count y. The reported data
does not include misdemeanor arrests, nor does it include convictions. However, this index does
offer insight into more serious crimes and the level of apprehension. The method of arriving at
an index involves summarizing the number felony arrests for violent and property crimes
reported b y local police departments, and standardizing the total for a population of 1,000. This
approach results in a standard number for comparative purposes.
Unemployment data is produced by the California Department of Emplo yment Development
and is reported for October 2016, the most recent available data at the time of constructing this
report.
Information concerning median home sales prices was acquired from Data Quick, which is
generall y recognized as the most reliable and comprehensive source of such information in
California.
1
0
IV. RESIDENCE INFORMATION
The first step in defining a relevant labor market for purposes of conducting a salary survey is
to determine the residences of both employment applicants and current employees. These
data points are consistent with the compensation objectives of recruitment and retention.
That is, to understand competitiveness, one needs to know where applicants and emplo yees
reside. In this regard, the following charts provide residence information b y city and count y
for over 11,000 recent employment applicants and over 1800 current employees.
Applicant Residence
EBMUD provided zip code information for 11090 applicants. The applicant information was
not sorted by job title, but only b y zip code. Consequently, it is not possible in the sorts below to
determine whether there was variation in residence by specific recruitments or whether any
particular recruitments had a greater or lesser impact on the overall numbers. However, given
the large size of the sample provided, it is likely that the data is representative of man y
recruitments.
The zip code date was first sorted so that all data was sorted b y zip code and the number of
applicants from each code. It was determined that zip codes which yielded fewer than five (5)
applicants would be removed from further analysis. This reduced the total number of
observations to 9924, or about 90% of the original data.
Next, all zip codes were linked to a city, and finally all cities to a county. This resulted in two
sorts. The first sort includes all cities ordered from the cities yielding the largest number of
applicants to those yielding the smallest. A total of 109 cities were identified in this sort. As
many of the cities represent small percentages of applicants, only cities which represent at least
.25% of the total are included in the table below.
Table of Applicant Residence by City (minimum .25% of 9924) High to Low
CITY # of Apps % of Total
Oakland 1799 18.13%
Hayward 607 6.12%
Richmond 581 5.85%
Concord 491 4.95%
Antioch 434 4.37%
1
1
Berkeley 397 4.00%
San Francisco 382 3.85%
Pittsburg 312 3.14%
Alameda 304 3.06%
Vallejo 285 2.87%
San Leandro 251 2.53%
Pinole 247 2.49%
Martinez 230 2.32%
Castro Valley 218 2.20%
Hercules 211 2.13%
Fremont 182 1.83%
Walnut Creek 177 1.78%
Dublin 158 1.59%
Fairfield 154 1.55%
Oakley 150 1.51%
Stockton 125 1.26%
San Jose 123 1.24%
Union City 123 1.24%
San Ramon 111 1.12%
Benicia 104 1.05%
Livermore 101 1.02%
Suisun City 98 0.99%
Orinda 92 0.93%
Vacaville 85 0.86%
Tracy 79 0.80%
Danville 75 0.76%
1
2
Sacramento 64 0.64%
Manteca 59 0.59%
Newark 57 0.57%
Albany 53 0.53%
Daly City 47 0.47%
San Mateo 44 0.44%
Valley Springs 41 0.41%
Pleasanton 39 0.39%
Elk Grove 34 0.34%
So San Francisco 29 0.29%
Sunnyvale 28 0.28%
American Canyon 27 0.27%
Discovery Bay 27 0.27%
Modesto 27 0.27%
Napa 26 0.26%
Rodeo 25 0.25%
In the instance of County residences, the reporting threshold was raised from .25% to .5%. As the county
totals tend to be much larger than the city totals, increasing the significance threshold is consistent with the
objective of the study.
1
3
Table of Applicant Residence by County (minimum .5% of 9924) High to Low
County County Totals % of Total
Alameda 4303 43.36%
Contra Costa 3223 32.48%
Solano 731 7.37%
San Francisco 382 3.85%
San Joaquin 326 3.28%
Santa Clara 202 2.04%
San Mateo 194 1.95%
Sacramento 177 1.78%
Stanislaus 63 0.63%
Napa 53 0.53%
Employee Residence
A similar analysis was conducted for employees. 1856 employee zip codes were reported, and sorted by city
and county. The results of that analysis are provided below.
Table of Employee Residence by City (minimum .5% of 1856) High to Low
City EE COUNT % of Total
Oakland 199 10.72%
Richmond 93 5.01%
San Leandro 90 4.85%
Concord 86 4.63%
Alameda 84 4.53%
Hayward 83 4.47%
Walnut Creek 72 3.88%
1
4
Berkeley 71 3.83%
Martinez 67 3.61%
San Francisco 54 2.91%
Castro Valley 53 2.86%
Pleasanton 53 2.86%
West Pittsburg 48 2.59%
Oakley 44 2.37%
Rodeo 39 2.10%
San Ramon 35 1.89%
Antioch 34 1.83%
Pleasant Hill 32 1.72%
Fairfield 29 1.56%
Vacaville 29 1.56%
Vallejo 27 1.45%
Pinole 26 1.40%
Brentwood 25 1.35%
Livermore 24 1.29%
El Cerrito 22 1.19%
San Lorenzo 22 1.19%
Stockton 22 1.19%
Fremont 19 1.02%
Emeryville 18 0.97%
Union City 18 0.97%
Piedmont 17 0.92%
Benicia 16 0.86%
Danville 15 0.81%
1
5
Manteca 15 0.81%
Tracy 15 0.81%
Sacramento 13 0.70%
Moraga 12 0.65%
Valley Springs 11 0.59%
Table of Employee Residence by County (minimum .5% of 1856) High to Low
County EE COUNT % of Total
Contra Costa 744 40.1%
Alameda 707 38.1%
Solano 116 6.3%
San Joaquin 69 3.7%
San Francisco 54 2.9%
Sacramento 29 1.6%
San Mateo 25 1.3%
Calaveras 24 1.3%
Amador 15 0.8%
Sonoma 12 0.6%
Santa Clara 11 0.6%
Marin 10 0.5%
Stanislaus 10 0.5%
1
6
Comparing Applicant to Employee Residence Information
In the following section, residences of both applicants and employees are compared by County. Only
counties with significant levels of either/or applicant and employee residences are reported with data. A
total of fourteen (14) counties met one or both criteria.
County Applicants % of Total Employees % of Total
Alameda 4303 43.36% 707 38.1%
Amador 15 0.8%
Calaveras 24 1.3%
Contra Costa 3223 32.48% 744 40.1%
Marin 10 0.5%
Napa 53 0.53%
Sacramento 177 1.78% 29 1.6%
San Francisco 382 3.85% 54 2.9%
San Joaquin 326 3.28% 69 3.7%
San Mateo 194 1.95% 25 1.3%
Santa Clara 202 2.04% 11 0.6%
Solano 731 7.37% 116 6.3%
Sonoma 12 0.6%
Stanislaus 63 0.63% 10 0.5%
1
7
V. POPULATION SORT
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and employees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in population to
Alameda are highlighted. Alameda County is used as the prox y for EBMUD as it has the
highest concentration of employee work locations.
County Jan-16 % Diff # Diff
Amador 37707 -97.7% -1589158
Calaveras 45207 -97.2% -1581658
Napa 142028 -91.3% -1484837
Marin 262274 -83.9% -1364591
Solano 431498 -73.5% -1195367
Sonoma 501959 -69.1% -1124906
Stanislaus 540214 -66.8% -1086651
San Joaquin 733383 -54.9% -893482
San Mateo 766041 -52.9% -860824
San Francisco 866583 -46.7% -760282
Contra Costa 1123429 -30.9% -503436
Sacramento 1495297 -8.1% -131568
Alameda 1626865 0.0% 0
Santa Clara 1927888 18.5% 301023
Source - California Dept of Finance 5/2016
1
8
1. Median Age Sort
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and employees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in median age to Alameda
are highlighted. Alameda Count y is used as the prox y for EBMUD as it has the highest
concentration of emplo yee work locations.
County Median Age (yrs) % Diff # Diff
San Joaquin 32.7 -10.7% -3.9
Stanislaus 32.9 -10.1% -3.7
Sacramento 34.8 -4.9% -1.8
Santa Clara 36.2 -1.1% -0.4
Alameda 36.6 0.0% 0
Solano 36.9 0.8% 0.3
Contra Costa 38.5 5.2% 1.9
San Francisco 38.5 5.2% 1.9
San Mateo 39.3 7.4% 2.7
Napa 39.7 8.5% 3.1
Sonoma 39.9 9.0% 3.3
Marin 44.5 21.6% 7.9
Amador 48.2 31.7% 11.6
Calaveras 49.2 34.4% 12.6
Source - Governing
1
9
2. Educational Attainment Level Sort
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and employees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in educational attainment
levels (holders of BA/BS degrees who are at least 25 years of age) to Alameda are highlighted.
Alameda Count y is used as the prox y for EBMUD as it has the highest concentration of
employee work locations.
County
BA/BS degree
or higher (25
yrs of age+)
% Diff
# Diff
Stanislaus 16.4% -61.0% -25.7%
San Joaquin 18.1% -57.0% -24.0%
Amador 20.5% -51.3% -21.6%
Calaveras 21.1% -49.9% -21.0%
Solano 24.3% -42.3% -17.8%
Sacramento 28.2% -33.0% -13.9%
Napa 31.9% -24.2% -10.2%
Sonoma 32.6% -22.6% -9.5%
Contra Costa 39.4% -6.4% -2.7%
Alameda 42.1% 0.0% 0.0%
San Mateo 45.0% 6.9% 2.9%
Santa Clara 47.3% 12.4% 5.2%
San Francisco 52.9% 25.7% 10.8%
Marin 54.8% 30.2% 12.7%
Source - US Census Bureau Quick Facts
2
0
3. Crime Level Sort
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and employees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in crime levels (combination
of violent and propert y crimes) to Alameda are highlighted. Alameda County is used as the
prox y for EBMUD as it has the highest concentration of employee work locations.
County
Violent
Crime
per 1K
residents
Property
Crime per
1K
residents
Total
% Diff
# Diff
Amador 2.2 16.9 19.1 -56.2% (24.50)
Marin 1.8 17.8 19.6 -55.0% (24.00)
Napa 3.8 17.1 20.9 -52.1% (22.70)
Sonoma 3.7 17.5 21.2 -51.4% (22.40)
San Mateo 2.1 19.2 21.3 -51.1% (22.30)
Sacramento 5.1 17.8 22.9 -47.5% (20.70)
Calaveras 2.5 22 24.5 -43.8% (19.10)
Santa Clara 2.5 23.4 25.9 -40.6% (17.70)
Contra Costa 3.4 29.8 33.2 -23.9% (10.40)
Solano 5 31.9 36.9 -15.4% (6.70)
Stanislaus 5.4 35.5 40.9 -6.2% (2.70)
San Joaquin 7.6 35.8 43.4 -0.5% (0.20)
Alameda 6.6 37 43.6 0.0% -
San Francisco 8.2 55.4 63.6 45.9% 20.00
Source - United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in
the United States, 2014, Table 8 (California).
2
1
4. Median Household Income Sort
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and employees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in median household
income to Alameda are highlighted. Alameda County is used as the prox y for EBMUD as it
has the highest concentration of employee work locations.
County
Median Household
Income
% Diff
# Diff
Stanislaus $ 49,573 -32.8% $(24,202)
Amador $ 52,964 -28.2% $(20,811)
San Joaquin $ 53,253 -27.8% $(20,522)
Calaveras $ 54,936 -25.5% $(18,839)
Sacramento $ 55,615 -24.6% $(18,160)
Sonoma $ 63,799 -13.5% $ (9,976)
Solano $ 67,341 -8.7% $ (6,434)
Napa $ 70,925 -3.9% $ (2,850)
Alameda $ 73,775 0.0% $ -
San Francisco $ 78,378 6.2% $ 4,603
Contra Costa $ 79,799 8.2% $ 6,024
San Mateo $ 91,421 23.9% $ 17,646
Marin $ 91,529 24.1% $ 17,754
Santa Clara $ 93,854 27.2% $ 20,079
Source - US Census Bureau Quick Facts
2
2
5. Median Home Sales Price Sort
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and emplo yees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in recent home sales prices
to Alameda are hi ghlighted. Alameda Count y is used as the prox y for EBMUD as it has the
highest concentration of employee work locations.
County Median Oct 2016 % Diff # Diff
Stanislaus $ 272,568 -59.3% $ (397,432)
Amador $ 276,500 -58.7% $ (393,500)
Sacramento $ 309,500 -53.8% $ (360,500)
San Joaquin $ 318,000 -52.5% $ (352,000)
Solano $ 375,000 -44.0% $ (295,000)
Contra Costa $ 512,500 -23.5% $ (157,500)
Sonoma $ 534,000 -20.3% $ (136,000)
Napa $ 575,000 -14.2% $ (95,000)
Alameda $ 670,000 0.0% $ -
Santa Clara $ 835,000 24.6% $ 165,000
Marin $ 962,000 43.6% $ 292,000
San Mateo $ 1,000,000 49.3% $ 330,000
San Francisco $ 1,120,000 67.2% $ 450,000
Calaveras not reported not reported not reported
Source - DataQuick
2
3
6. Unemployment
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and employees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in unemployment levels
to Alameda are highlighted. Alameda Count y is used as the prox y for EBMUD as it has the
highest concentration of employee work locations.
County Oct-16 % Diff # Diff
San Mateo 3.1% -27.9% -1.2%
Marin 3.3% -23.3% -1.0%
San Francisco 3.4% -20.9% -0.9%
Napa 3.8% -11.6% -0.5%
Santa Clara 3.8% -11.6% -0.5%
Sonoma 3.9% -9.3% -0.4%
Alameda 4.3% 0.0% 0.0%
Contra Costa 4.5% 4.7% 0.2%
Solano 5.3% 23.3% 1.0%
Sacramento 5.4% 25.6% 1.1%
Amador 5.5% 27.9% 1.2%
Calaveras 5.5% 27.9% 1.2%
San Joaquin 7.6% 76.7% 3.3%
Stanislaus 7.9% 83.7% 3.6%
Source – California Employment Development Department
Note – Ties are not included as proximate where they appear at the edge of range
2
4
7. Poverty Level Sort
The fourteen (14) counties from in which the highest number of applicants and employees
reside are listed below. The sort is from low to high. Those closest in poverty levels to
Alameda are highlighted. Alameda County is used as the prox y for EBMUD as it has the
highest concentration of employee work locations.
County
Persons in
Poverty
% Diff
# Diff
San Mateo 7.50% -40.0% -5.0%
Santa Clara 8.50% -32.0% -4.0%
Marin 8.80% -29.6% -3.7%
Napa 9.00% -28.0% -3.5%
Contra Costa 10.50% -16.0% -2.0%
Sonoma 11.30% -9.6% -1.2%
San Francisco 12.10% -3.2% -0.4%
Solano 12.30% -1.6% -0.2%
Alameda 12.50% 0.0% 0.0%
Amador 12.90% 3.2% 0.4%
Calaveras 13.70% 9.6% 1.2%
Sacramento 18.10% 44.8% 5.6%
Stanislaus 18.10% 44.8% 5.6%
San Joaquin 20.70% 65.6% 8.2%
Source - US Census Quick Facts
2
5
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
A. Recommended Survey Universe
The table below indicates each instance in which a count y was within the nine (9) closest to
Alameda on each reported data point, along with the total number of incidents. The table is
sorted from the counties with the largest number of similarities to Alameda to those with the
lowest. The agencies highlighted in yellow constitute the recommended rational survey
universe after appl ying t he primar y sort filters and demographic and county wealth factors.
County
Crime
Ed
level
Home
Sales
Price
Median Age M edian
Household
Inco me
Population
Poverty
Level
Unemp
Totals
Alameda
Contra
Costa
x x x x x x x x 8
Solano x x x x x x x x 8
Sacramento x x x x x x x 7
San
Francisco
x x x x x x x 7
Santa Clara x x x x x x x 7
Sonoma x x x x x x x 7
Napa x x x x x x 6
San Mateo x x x x x x 6
Marin x x x x x 5
Calaveras x x x 3
San
Joaquin
x x x 3
Stanislaus x x x 3
Amador x 1
2
6
VII. RECOMMENDED EMPLOYERS
The following includes a variety of water and/or wastewater utility district employers and
municipalities which operate water and/or wastewater utilities within the Recommended Survey
Universe. Ideall y, a survey should include 12-16 employers. Based on this guideline and the
anal ysis in this report, at least one employer was selected for each of the proposed universe
counties. As the largest proportion of candidates and employees reside in Alameda and Contra
Costa counties, they are more heavil y represented. Sixteen (16) emplo yers have been identified
in all, as listed below.
County Employer
Alameda Alameda County Water District
Dublin San Ramon Services District
Union Sanitary District
Zone 7 Water Agenc y
Contra Costa Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Contra Costa Water District
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
West County Wastewater District
Marin Marin Municipal Water District
Napa City of Napa
Sacramento Sacramento Municipal Utility District
San Francisco City & Count y of San Francisco
San Mateo City of Dal y Cit y
Santa Clara Santa Clara Valle y Water District
Solano Vallejo Sanitation District
Sonoma County of Sonoma
VIII. TOTAL COMPENSATION
27
A. Overview of Survey Methodology
Classification Matching
Classification matching across employers is challenging and potentiall y imprecise, while some
classifications exhibit substantial overlap in key duties across organizations, some do not.
Differences in operational and organizational structure, size of the employer, and the services
offered often results i n variations in the organization of job duties between emplo yers.
Additionally, classification documents are often out of date, with regular maintenance occurring
only sporadicall y. In the end, the most reliable and efficient classification matching relies on skilled
and experienced anal ysts who have substantial familiarity with public sector classifications plans
and practices, and who are able to read classification descriptions with a strong ability to recognize
similarities and distinctions. For this project, PMG utilized analysts with a total of more than
sevent y-five (75) years of public sector classification experience.
In order to determine appropriate matches for EBMUD selected job classifications, PMG relied
primarily upon publicl y available job descriptions and Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
posted on agencies’ websites. If data was unavailable or where job matching was unclear, PMG
contacted Human Resources staff b y phone and/or email for clarification. The following key factors
were used in determining appropriate matches:
▪ Major job duties;
▪ Training and experience requirements;
▪ Reporting relationships; and,
▪ Level of supervision received/exercised.
Elements of Compensation Included in the Survey
To facilitate a commensurable comparison across employers, PMG uses March 2017 as a snapshot
date. Where an MOU was expired, PMG collected and used the most recent salar y schedule
available. The “notes” sections contain additional information regarding compensation data.
There are several components reported in the survey:
▪ Identification of the comparator agenc y;
▪ Title of the matching or corresponding survey classification;
▪ Maximum monthly salary;
▪ Employer paid member contribution (EPMC) both as a percentage and dollar
equivalent;
▪ Employer Pension Contribution both as a percentage and dollar equivalent;
▪ Employer Social Security and Medicare contributions both as a percentage and dollar
equivalent;
28
▪ Employer paid deferred compensation;
▪ Employer paid health insurance premiums;
▪ Employer paid dental insurance premiums;
▪ Employer paid vision insurance premiums;
▪ Employer paid supplemental insurance premiums;
In addition, two totals have been calculated including total cash, and total cash plus benefits.
• Maximum monthly salary - The first reported surve y data point is base salary. PMG
collected and analyz ed the maximum base wage (i.e., top step) from employer salar y
plans and schedules for each classification.
• Employer paid member contribution (EPMC) both as a percentage and dollar
equivalent- Emplo yers may pick up some or all of the mandatory emplo yee
contribution for employe es hired prior to Januar y 2013. This data point reflects
instances and the value of such practices.
• Employer Pension Contribution both as a percentage and dollar equivalent – this data
point reports the normal employer contribution to a defined benefit retirement plan. The
data provided represents the “blended rate” of the “classic plan” and the “pension
reform act” plan. Or, when the blended rate was not available, it reports the rate for the
“classic plan”. The percentage and cost is for the normal rate only, and does not include
the unfunded actuarial liability (UAL). T ypicall y, the annual cost will be higher, as it
would include both the normal cost and the unfunded liability. However, as that cost is
subject to annual change and can be influenced by factors such as the level of unfunded
liabilit y the employer wishes to pay down, it is not used in this report.
• Employer Social Security and Medicare contributions both as a percentage and dollar
equivalent - Contributions to Social Security are 6.2% up to the Social Security Wage
Base of $118,500 in 2016 for participating employers and employees.
• Employer paid deferred compensation – this data point reports the amount, if any, which
the employer contributes to a deferred compensation plan for employees. In
some cases the amount is provided without condition, and in others it requires an
employee match. Further, in all cases the contribution is limited to the IRS limit for
annual contributions to such accounts.
• Employer paid health insurance premiums – this data point reflects the maximum
employer contribution toward an HMO health insurance benefit for employee plus
families. This standard was chosen as the substantial percentage of EBMUD employees
have selected the Kaiser HMO plan for their health insurance provider.
• Employer paid dental insurance premiums – this data points reflects the maximum
employer contribution towards dental care premiums for employee plus family.
• Employer paid vision insurance premiums - this data points reflects the maximum
employer contribution towards vision care premiums for employee plus family.
• Employer paid vision insurance premiums - this data points reflects the maximum
employer contribution towards vision care premiums for employee plus family.
• Employer paid other insurance premiums – this data point reflects other health and
welfare related insurance premiums paid by the employer. Such information might
include supplemental benefit dollars and additional cafeteria plan contributions.
• Some employers combine their contribution toward health, dental, and vision through
a cafeteria plan. In these cases, the maximum employer contribution toward the
cafeteria plan is listed under the “Health” column, but dental and vision plans may still
29
be available to emplo yees and their dependents.
B. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Using the compensation data described above, the surve y reports EBMUD’s variance from the
median and mean of the comparison agencies, excluding EBMUD. The variances for all of the
classifications studied are presented in multiple summary and detailed tables at the end of this
report.
The report includes two measures of central tendency, including means and medians. The mean is
the arithmetic average of all observations, and is most familiar to most readers. It is generall y
recognized as a useful measure when there are a large number of observations. The median is the
midpoint in a distribution of observations. When there are an odd number in a set, the median is
the middle observations. When there is an even number in a set, the median is the average of the
two middle observations. The median is a more effective measure to avoid the potential impactof
outliers. When both the mean and median are the same or ver y close, the distribution is considered
close to normal. When the mean and median are less similar, the data is likely to contain outlier
observations.
The statistical information is provided solely for purposes of information, and to help provide some
context to the survey dat a. It is not intended to constitute a recommendation either for or against
market based salar y adjustments.
30
C. SUMMARY TABLE OF OUTCOMES
The following table includes a summary of the survey outcomes, and provides the total
compensation for the EBMUD survey class, the mean of all survey comparators, the median of all
survey comparators and both the percentage of the EBMUD class above or below the mean and
the median.
Survey Class EBMUD Survey Mean Survey Median %
Above/Below
Mean
%
Above/Below
Median
Accounting
Technician
$10,379 $10,191 $10,295 1.8% 0.8%
Admin Clerk $8,879 $8,560 $8,742 3.7% 1.6%
Assoc. Civil
Engineer
$15,390 $15,309 $15,409 0.5% -0.1%
Carpenter $11,479 $ 10,989 $10,953 4.5% 4.8%
Chemist II $12,993 $ 13,039 $13,292 -0.4% -2.2%
Construction
Inspector
$12,721 $ 12,662 $12,621 0.5% 0.8%
Customer Services
Rep II
$9,222 $9,450 $9,088 -2.4% 1.5%
Electrical Tech $12,461 $12,382 $12,544 0.6% -0.7%
Engineering
Designer II
$12,721 $11,301 $11,309 12.6% 12.5%
EHS
Specialist II
$14,128 $12,851 $12,388 9.9% 14.0%
Facility Specialist
II
$11,249 $10,219 $10,282 10.1% 9.4%
Gardener II $9,406 $8,912 $8,821 5.5% 6.6%
Heavy Equipment
Mechanic
$11,479 $11,219 $11,405 2.3% 0.7%
Heavy Equipment
Operator
$11,019 $10,577 $10,410 4.2% 5.8%
Instrument
Technician
$12,461 $12,776 $13,025 -2.5% -4.3%
31
Janitor $ 8,081 $7,482 $7,270 8.0% 11.2%
Lab Tech II $10,379 $10,710 $11,012 -3.1% -5.8%
Maint. Machinist $12,209 $12,723 $12,719 -4.0% -4.0%
Pipeline Welder III $11,249 $11,601 $11,474 -3.0% -2.0%
32
D. DETAILED REPORTS OF CLASSIFICATION
The pages that follow the summaries include the detailed analysis for each classification
Acctg Tech EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Agency Match Class Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Accounting Assistant 2 $ 7,249 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 776 1.45% $ 105 $ - $ 8,130 $ 2,581 168$ 23$ -$ 2,772$ 10,902$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District
Accounting Technician I/II $ 6,022 0.00% $ - 16.99% $ 1,023 1.45% $ 87 $ 373 $ 7,506 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 11,216$
City & County of San Francisco NC
City of Daly City Accounting Technician $ 6,777 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 805 1.45% $ 98 $ - $ 7,680 $ 2,426 $ 108 $ 13 $ - 2,547$ 10,227$
City of Napa Accounting Technician $ 5,987 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 631 1.45% $ 87 $ 50 $ 6,755 $ 1,575 137$ -$ -$ 1,712$ 8,467$
Contra Costa Water District NC 8.07%
County of Sonoma Accounting Technician $ 4,783 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 427 7.65% $ 366 $ 120 $ 5,695 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 8,129$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Accounting Technician $ 7,546 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 928 7.65% $ 577 $ 264 $ 9,315 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 11,479$
Dublin San Ramon Services District Accounting Technician II $ 7,753 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 905 7.65% $ 593 $ 208 $ 9,460 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 11,297$
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility
District
Accounting Technician $ 5,515 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 427 7.65% $ 422 $ 50 $ 6,414 $ 2,396 151$ 14$ 4$ 2,565$ 8,979$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Accounting Technician $ 7,127 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 712 1.45% $ 103 $ 83 $ 8,026 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 9,896$
Union Sanitary District Accounting Technician II $ 7,627 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 671 1.45% $ 111 $ - $ 8,408 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 10,891$
Vallejo Sanitation District Accounting Technician I/II $ 6,877 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 803 1.45% $ 100 $ - $ 7,779 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 10,816$
West County Wastewater District Accounting Technician II $ 7,204 1.00% $ 72 12.70% $ 915 1.45% $ 104 $ - $ 8,295 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 9,894$
Zone 7 Water Agency Account Clerk, Zone 7 $ 6,550 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 488 7.65% $ 501 $ - $ 7,539 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 10,295$
EBMUD Accounting Technician 6,854$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 991 7.65% $ 524 -$ $ 8,369 1,686$ 224$ 24$ 75$ 2,009$ 10,379$
Mean 6,694$ 7,769$ 10,191$
Median 6,877$ 7,779$ 10,295$
EBMUD to Mean 2.4%7.7%1.8%
EBMUD to Median -0.3%7.6%0.8%
Retirement Social
Security
33
Admin Clerk EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable
Classification
Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Suppleme
ntal
Total
Health
Total Cash
+Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost $%$
Alameda County Water District Office Assistant II $ 6,395 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 684 1.45% $ 93 $ - $ 7,172 $ 2,746 168$ 23$ -$ 2,937$ 10,109$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District
NC
City & County of San Francisco Clerk Typist $ 6,006 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 619 7.65% $ 459 $ - $ 7,084 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $- 1,939$ 9,023$
City of Daly City Office Assistant II $ 5,629 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 669 1.45% $ 82 $ - $ 6,379 $ 2,426 $ 108 $ 13 $- 2,547$ 8,926$
City of Napa Office Assistant II $ 4,668 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 492 1.45% $ 68 $ 100 $ 5,328 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 7,260$
Contra Costa Water District Office Services Clerk $ 5,658 1.00% $ 57 8.07% $ 457 7.65% $ 433 $ - $ 6,604 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 8,742$
County of Sonoma Office Assistant II $ 3,595 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 321 7.65% $ 275 $ 90 $ 4,281 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 6,715$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Administrative Assistant I $ 5,581 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 686 7.65% $ 427 $ 195 $ 6,889 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 9,053$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Administrative Assistant I 5,842$ 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 682 7.65% $ 447 $ 208 $ 7,179 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 9,016$
Marin Municipal Water District Office Assistant II $ 5,256 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 481 7.65% $ 402 $ - $ 6,139 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 7,994$
Sacramento Municipal Utility
District
OFFICE SPECIALIST II $ 4,754 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 368 7.65% $ 364 $ 50 $ 5,536 $ 2,396 151$ 14$ 4$ 2,565$ 8,101$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Office Specialist II $ 5,999 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 599 1.45% $ 87 $ 83 $ 6,768 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 8,638$
Union Sanitary District Office Assistant II $ 6,255 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 550 1.45% $ 91 $ - $ 6,896 $ 2,316 $ 144 23$ -$ 2,483$ 9,379$
Vallejo Sanitation District Office Assistant $ 4,929 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 575 1.45% $ 71 $ - $ 5,575 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 8,612$
West County Wastewater District Administrative Clerk $ 5,194 1.00% $ 52 12.70% $ 659 1.45% $ 75 $ - $ 5,980 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 7,579$
Zone 7 Water Agency Office Assistant, Zone 7 $ 5,647 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 421 7.65% $ 432 $ - $ 6,500 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 9,256$
EBMUD Administrative Clerk 5,626$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 814 7.65% $ 430 -$ $ 6,870 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 8,879$
Mean 5,427$ 6,287$ 8,560$
Median 5,629$ 6,500$ 8,742$
EBMUD to Mean 3.7%9.3%3.7%
EBMUD to Median -0.1%5.7%1.6%
Retirement Social Security
34
Assoc Civil Eng EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable
Classification
Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC $ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Engineer III (Civil) $ 12,577 2.50% $ 314 10.70% $ 1,346 1.45% $ 182 $ - $14,420 $ 2,447 168$ 23$ -$ 2,639$ 17,059$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Associate Engineer $ 11,502 0.00% $ - 16.99% $ 1,954 1.45% $ 167 $ 713 $14,336 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - $ 220 3,831$ 18,166$
City & County of San Francisco Associate Engineer $ 10,326 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 1,064 7.65% $ 790 $ - $12,180 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 14,119$
City of Daly City Civil Engineering Associate $ 9,815 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 1,166 1.45% $ 142 $ - $11,123 $ 1,180 $ - $ 13 $ - 1,193$ 12,316$
City of Napa Associate Civil Engineer $ 9,265 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 976 1.45% $ 134 $ 100 $10,475 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 12,408$
Contra Costa Water District Associate Engineer $ 11,003 3.00% $ 330 8.07% $ 888 7.65% $ 817 $ 330 $13,038 1,907$ $ 170 $ 17 $ 50 2,144$ 15,182$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Engineer IV 13,335$ 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 1,190 7.65% $ 851 $ 333 $15,709 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 18,143$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Associate Engineer $ 11,977 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 1,472 7.65% $ 831 $ 419 $14,699 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 16,864$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Associate Civil Engineer
(SME)
$ 12,077 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 1,410 7.65% $ 832 $ 208 $14,528 $ 1,640 168$ 21$ -$ 1,829$ 16,356$
Marin Municipal Water District Associate Engineer $ 10,509 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 962 7.65% $ 804 $ - $12,275 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 14,130$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Associate Civil Engineer (j) $ 10,224 1.75% $ 179 7.74% $ 792 7.65% $ 782 $ 167 $12,143 $ 2,136 $ 162 $13.63 -$ 2,312$ 14,455$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Associate Civil Engineer $ 11,372 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 1,136 1.45% $ 165 $ 83 $12,756 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 14,626$
Union Sanitary District Associate Engineer $ 11,932 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 1,049 1.45% $ 173 $ - $13,154 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 15,637$
Vallejo Sanitation District Associate Engineer $ 11,497 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 1,342 1.45% $ 167 $ - $13,005 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 16,042$
West County Wastewater District Associate Engineer $ 9,843 1.00% $ 98 12.70% $ 1,250 1.45% $ 143 $ - $11,334 1,907$ $ 103 13$ -$ 2,022$ 13,356$
Zone 7 Water Agency Associate Civil
Engineer/Professional
Geologist, Zone 7
$ 11,639 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 867 7.65% $ 826 $ - $13,332 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 16,088$
EBMUD Associate Civil Engineer $ 10,958 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,585 7.65% $ 838 -$ $13,381 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 15,390$
Mean 11,181$ 13,032$ 15,309$
Median 11,434$ 13,022$ 15,409$
EBMUD to Mean -2.0%2.7%0.5%
EBMUD to Median -4.2%2.8%-0.1%
Retirement Social Security
35
Carpenter EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District NC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Carpenter II $ 7,642 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 787 7.65% $ 585 $ - $ 9,014 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 10,953$
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma NC
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Maintenance Carpenter $ 7,242 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 561 7.65% $ 554 $175 $ 8,532 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 11,071$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Carpenter II $ 8,069 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 806 1.45% $ 117 $ 83 $ 9,075 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 10,944$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency NC
EBMUD Carpenter 7,755$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,121 7.65% $ 593 -$ $ 9,470 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,479$
Mean 7,651$ 8,873$ 10,989$
Median 7,642$ 9,014$ 10,953$
EBMUD to Mean 1.4%6.7%4.5%
EBMUD to Median 1.5%5.1%4.8%
Retirement Social Security
36
Chemist II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable
Classification
Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC $ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Chemist II $ 9,791 2.5% $ 245 10.70% $ 1,048 1.45% $ 142 $ - $11,226 $ 2,517 168$ 23$ -$ 2,708$ 13,934$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District
Chemist II $ 8,057 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,369 1.45% $ 117 $ 500 $10,043 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - $ 220 3,831$ 13,873$
City & County of San Francisco Chemist II $ 8,662 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 892 7.65% $ 663 $ - $10,217 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 12,156$
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa Water Quality Analyst $ 7,933 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 835 1.45% $ 115 $ 100 $ 8,983 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 10,916$
Contra Costa Water District Chemist/Mircrobiologist $ 8,975 3.00% $ 269 8.07% $ 724 7.65% $ 687 $ 269 $10,386 1,907$ $ 170 $ 17 $ 50 2,144$ 12,530$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Chemist $ 9,841 0% $ - 8.92% $ 878 7.65% $ 753 $ 246 $11,718 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 14,152$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Chemist II $ 9,189 0% $ - 12.29% $ 1,130 7.65% $ 703 $ 322 $11,344 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 13,508$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Environmental Chemist II $ 9,963 0% $ - 11.68% $ 1,163 7.65% $ 762 $ 208 $12,097 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 13,934$
Marin Municipal Water District Chemist II $ 8,899 0% $ - 9.16% $ 815 7.65% $ 681 $ - $10,394 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 12,250$
Sacramento Municipal Utility
District
NC
Santa Clara Valley Water District Chemist II $ 9,585 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 957 1.45% $ 139 $ 83 $10,765 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 12,634$
Union Sanitary District Chemist $ 9,791 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 861 1.45% $ 142 $ - $10,794 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 13,277$
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Water Quality Chemist,
Zone 7
$ 9,168 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 683 7.65% $ 701 $ - $10,552 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 13,308$
EBMUD Chemist II 8,995$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,301 7.65% $ 688 -$ $10,984 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,993$
Mean 9,155$ 10,710$ 13,039$
Median 9,178$ 10,658$ 13,292$
EBMUD to Mean -1.7%2.6%-0.4%
EBMUD to Median -2.0%3.1%-2.2%
Retirement Social Security
37
Construction Inspect EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Construction Inspector II $ 9,989 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 1,069 1.45% $ 145 $ - $ 11,203 $ 2,512 168$ 23$ -$ 2,703$ 13,907$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Engineering Assistant $ 7,288 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,238 1.45% $ 106 $ 452 $ 9,084 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - $ 100 3,711$ 12,795$
City & County of San Francisco Construction Inspector $ 8,964 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 924 7.65% $ 686 $ - $ 10,573 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 12,511$
City of Daly City Public Works Inspector $ 7,645 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 908 1.45% $ 111 $ - $ 8,664 $ 1,530 $ - $ 13 $ - 1,543$ 10,207$
City of Napa Construction Inspector $ 7,467 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 786 1.45% $ 108 $ 100 $ 8,461 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 10,394$
Contra Costa Water District Construction Inspector $ 8,327 1.00% $ 83 8.07% $ 672 7.65% $ 637 $ 250 $ 9,636 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 11,774$
County of Sonoma NC
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Construction Inspector $ 8,797 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 1,081 7.65% $ 673 $ 308 $ 10,859 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 13,023$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Construction Inspector II $ 9,543 0% $ - 11.68% $ 1,114 7.65% $ 730 $ 208 $ 11,596 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 13,433$
Marin Municipal Water District Construction Inspector $ 8,966 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 821 7.65% $ 686 $ - $ 10,473 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 12,328$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Construction Management Inspector
I
$ 8,671 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 671 7.65% $ 663 $ 50 $ 10,056 $ 2,396 151$ 14$ 4$ 2,565$ 12,621$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Construction Inspector II $ 8,684 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 867 1.45% $ 126 $ 83 $ 9,760 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 11,630$
Union Sanitary District Construction Inspector II $ 9,320 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 819 1.45% $ 135 $ - $ 10,274 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 12,758$
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Construction Inspector, Zone 7 $ 12,575 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 937 7.65% $ 962 $ - $ 14,474 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 17,230$
EBMUD Construction Inspector 8,772$ 0.00% $ -14.46% $ 1,268 7.65% $ 671 -$ $ 10,711 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,721$
Mean 8,941$ 10,393$ 12,662$
Median 8,797$ 10,274$ 12,621$
EBMUD to Mean -1.9%3.1%0.5%
EBMUD to Median -0.3%4.3%0.8%
Retirement Social Security
38
Customer Serv Rep II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Customer Account Rep II $ 6,395 0.0% $ - 10.70% $ 684 1.45% $ 93 $ - $ 7,172 $ 2,602 168$ 23$ -$ 2,793$ 9,965$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco NC
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District Customer Service Rep $ 5,954 1.0% $ 60 8.07% $ 480 7.65% $ 455 $ - $ 6,950 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 9,088$
County of Sonoma NC
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District Customer Service Rep II $ 7,231 0% $ - 11.68% $ 844 7.65% $ 553 $ 208 $ 8,837 $ 1,640 168$ $29.13 -$ 1,837$ 10,674$
Marin Municipal Water District Customer Service Rep II $ 5,729 0% $ - 9.16% $ 524 7.65% $ 438 $ - $ 6,692 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 8,547$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Customer Service Rep II $ 5,515 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 427 7.65% $ 422 $ 50 $ 6,414 $ 2,396 151$ 14$ 4$ 2,565$ 8,979$
Santa Clara Valley Water District NC
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency NC
EBMUD Customer Service Rep II 5,907$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 854 7.65% $ 452 -$ $ 7,213 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 9,222$
Mean 6,165$ 7,213$ 9,450$
Median 5,954$ 6,950$ 9,088$
EBMUD to Mean -4.2%0.0%-2.4%
EBMUD to Median -0.8%3.8%1.5%
Retirement Social Security
39
Electrical Tech EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Electrician $ 9,598 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 1,027 1.45% $ 139 $ - $ 10,764 $ 2,522 168$ 23$ -$ 2,713$ 13,477$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Electrical Technician $ 6,631 0.00% $ - 16.99% $ 1,127 1.45% $ 96 $ 411 $ 8,264 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - $ 100 3,711$ 11,975$
City & County of San Francisco Electrician $ 8,593 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 885 7.65% $ 657 $ - $ 10,136 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 12,074$
City of Daly City Plant & Equipment Maintenance
Electrician
$ 7,540 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 896 1.45% $ 109 $ - $ 8,545 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 9,853$
City of Napa Plaint Maintenance Electrician $ 7,310 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 770 1.45% $ 106 $ 100 $ 8,285 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 10,218$
Contra Costa Water District Electrical Technician $ 8,987 1.00% $ 90 8.07% $ 725 7.65% $ 688 $ 270 $ 10,400 1,907$ $ 170 $ 17 $ 50 2,144$ 12,544$
County of Sonoma Elecctrician/Instrumentation
Techician
$ 9,129 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 814 7.65% $ 698 $ 228 $ 10,870 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 13,305$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Electrical/Instrumentation
Technician II
$ 8,256 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 1,015 7.65% $ 632 $ 289 $ 10,191 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 12,356$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Electrician $ 9,327 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 1,089 7.65% $ 714 $ 208 $ 11,338 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 13,175$
Marin Municipal Water District Mechanical Electrical Worker IV $ 9,076 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 831 7.65% $ 694 $ - $ 10,601 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 12,456$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Electrician $ 9,008 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 697 7.65% $ 689 $ 175 $ 10,570 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 13,109$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Industrial Electrician II $ 9,123 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 911 1.45% $ 132 $ 83 $ 10,249 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 12,119$
Union Sanitary District Instrument Technician Electrician $ 9,562 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 841 1.45% $ 139 $ - $ 10,542 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 13,025$
Vallejo Sanitation District Electrical Electronic Maintenance
Person
$ 8,464 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 988 1.45% $ 123 $ - $ 9,574 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 12,611$
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Electrician $ 9,277 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 691 7.65% $ 710 $ - $ 10,678 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 13,433$
EBMUD Electrical Technician 8,559$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,238 7.65% $ 655 -$ $ 10,451 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,461$
Mean 8,659$ 10,067$ 12,382$
Median 9,008$ 10,400$ 12,544$
EBMUD to Mean -1.2%3.8%0.6%
EBMUD to Median -5.0%0.5%-0.7%
Retirement Social Security
Eng Designer II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Engineering Technician 2 $ 8,639 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 925 1.45% $ 125 $ - $ 9,689 $ 2,546 168$ 23$ -$ 2,737$ 12,426$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Engineering Technician II $ 6,631 0.00% $ - 16.99% $ 1,127 1.45% $ 96 $ 411 $ 8,264 $ 3,397 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ 100 7,108$ 15,372$
City & County of San Francisco Engineering Assistant $ 6,621 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 682 7.65% $ 507 $ - $ 7,810 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 9,748$
City of Daly City Engineering Technician $ 6,947 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 825 1.45% $ 101 $ - $ 7,873 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 9,180$
City of Napa Engineering Assistant $ 7,931 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 835 1.45% $ 115 $ 100 $ 8,981 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 10,913$
Contra Costa Water District Engineering Technician II $ 7,725 1.00% $ 77 8.07% $ 623 7.65% $ 591 $ 232 $ 8,940 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 11,078$
County of Sonoma Engineering Technician III $ 6,397 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 571 7.65% $ 489 $ 160 $ 7,617 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 10,051$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Engineering Technician $ 7,896 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 971 7.65% $ 604 $ 276 $ 9,748 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 11,912$
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District Engineering Technician $ 7,122 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 652 7.65% $ 545 $ - $ 8,319 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 10,174$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Engineering Designer II $ 7,558 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 585 7.65% $ 578 $ 50 $ 8,771 $ 2,396 151$ 14$ 4$ 2,565$ 11,336$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Engineering Technician III $ 7,866 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 785 1.45% $ 114 $ 83 $ 8,849 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 10,718$
Union Sanitary District Engineering Technician II $ 8,647 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 760 1.45% $ 125 $ - $ 9,532 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 12,015$
Vallejo Sanitation District Engineering Technician $ 7,336 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 856 1.45% $ 106 $ - $ 8,298 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 11,335$
West County Wastewater District Sr. Engineering Technician $ 8,448 1.00% $ 84 12.70% $ 1,073 1.45% $ 123 $ - $ 9,728 $ 1,478 103$ -$ -$ 1,581$ 11,309$
Zone 7 Water Agency Water Resources Technician II,
Zone 7
$ 7,980 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 595 7.65% $ 610 $ - $ 9,185 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 11,941$
EBMUD Engineering Designer II 8,772$ 0.00% $ -14.46% $ 1,268 7.65% $ 671 -$ $10,711 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,721$
Mean 7,583$ 8,774$ 11,301$
Median 7,725$ 8,849$ 11,309$
EBMUD to Mean 15.7%22.1%12.6%
EBMUD to Median 13.5%21.1%12.5%
Retirement Social Security
41
EHS SPEC II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Env Health & Safety Specialist II $ 9,791 2.5% $ 245 10.70% $ 1,048 1.45% $ 142 $ - $11,226 $ 2,517 168$ 23$ -$ 2,708$ 13,934$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Operations Safety Specialist $ 9,513 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,616 1.45% $ 138 $ 590 $11,858 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - $ 220 3,831$ 15,688$
City & County of San Francisco Safety Analyst $ 10,476 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 1,079 7.65% $ 801 $ - $12,357 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 14,296$
City of Daly City Safety Inspector II 10,180$ 0.0% $ - 11.88% $ 1,209 1.45% $ 148 $ - $11,537 $ 2,426 $ - $ 13 $ - 2,439$ 13,976$
City of Napa Safety Officer $ 8,204 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 864 1.45% $ 119 $ 100 $ 9,287 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 11,219$
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma Risk Managerment Analyst II $ 7,769 0% $ - 8.92% $ 693 7.65% $ 594 $ 194 $ 9,251 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 11,685$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District Safety & Technical Training
Specialist
$ 8,293 0% $ - 9.16% $ 759 7.65% $ 634 $ - $ 9,687 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 11,542$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Safety and Loss Prevention
Specialist I
$ 7,990 1.75% $ 140 7.74% $ 619 7.65% $ 611 $175 $ 9,535 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 12,074$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Safety Specialist $ 8,469 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 846 1.45% $ 123 $ 83 $ 9,521 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 11,391$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Safety Technician II, Zone 7 $ 8,642 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 644 7.65% $ 661 $ - $ 9,947 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 12,703$
EBMUD Env Health & Safety Specialist II $ 9,924 0.00% $ -14.46% $ 1,435 7.65% $ 759 -$ $12,118 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 14,128$
Mean 8,933$ 10,420$ 12,851$
Median 8,556$ 9,817$ 12,388$
EBMUD to Mean 11.1%16.3%9.9%
EBMUD to Median 16.0%23.4%14.0%
Retirement Social Security
42
Facility Spec II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Facilities Maintenance Worker $ 8,426 0.0% $ - 10.70% $ 902 1.45% $ 122 $ - $ 9,450 $ 2,551 168$ 23$ -$ 2,742$ 12,192$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Stationary Engineer $ 7,505 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 773 7.65% $ 574 $ - $ 8,852 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 10,791$
City of Daly City Building Maintenance Worker II $ 5,705 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 678 1.45% $ 83 $ - $ 6,466 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 7,773$
City of Napa Maintenance Craftsworker $ 6,336 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 667 1.45% $ 92 $ 100 $ 7,195 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 9,128$
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma Building Mechanic II $ 6,291 0.0% $ - 8.92% $ 561 7.65% $ 481 $ 157 $ 7,491 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 9,925$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Maintenance Mechanic II $ 8,038 0.0% $ - 12.29% $ 988 7.65% $ 615 $ 281 $ 9,923 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 12,087$
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Building Maintenance Mechanic $ 7,368 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 571 7.65% $ 564 $175 $ 8,678 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 11,217$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Building Maintenance Technician II $ 7,677 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 767 1.45% $ 111 $ 83 $ 8,638 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 10,508$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District Utility Worker $ 6,007 1.00% $ 60 12.70% $ 763 1.45% $ 87 $ - $ 6,917 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 8,515$
Zone 7 Water Agency Building Maintenance Worker II $ 6,342 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 472 7.65% $ 485 $ - $ 7,300 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 10,056$
EBMUD Facility Specialist II $7,567 0.00% $ -14.46% $ 1,094 7.65% $ 579 -$ $ 9,240 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,249$
Mean 6,970$ 8,091$ 10,219$
Median 6,855$ 8,064$ 10,282$
EBMUD to Mean 8.6%14.2%10.1%
EBMUD to Median 10.4%14.6%9.4%
Retirement Social Security
43
Gardener II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Gardener 2 $ 7,140 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 764 1.45% $ 104 $ - $8,007 $ 2,583 168$ 23$ -$ 2,775$ 10,782$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Gardener $ 5,835 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 601 7.65% $ 446 $ - $6,883 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 8,821$
City of Daly City Groundskeeper/Gardener II $ 5,705 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 678 1.45% $ 83 $ - $6,466 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 7,773$
City of Napa Park Maintenance Worker II $ 5,364 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 565 1.45% $ 78 $ 100 $6,107 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 8,039$
Contra Costa Water District Grounds Maintenance Assistant $ 6,318 1.00% $ 63 8.07% $ 510 7.65% $ 483 $ 190 $7,311 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 9,449$
County of Sonoma Groundskeeper $ 4,298 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 383 7.65% $ 329 $ 107 $5,117 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 7,551$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District Maintenance Worker II $ 6,907 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 632 7.65% $ 528 $ - $8,068 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 9,923$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Gardener $ 5,670 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 439 7.65% $ 434 $175 $6,717 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 9,256$
Santa Clara Valley Water District NC
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Gardener II $ 5,089 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 379 7.65% $ 389 $ - $5,858 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 8,613$
EBMUD Gardener II 6,057$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 876 7.65% $ 463 -$ $7,396 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 9,406$
Mean 5,814$ 6,726$ 8,912$
Median 5,705$ 6,717$ 8,821$
EBMUD to Mean 4.2%10.0%5.5%
EBMUD to Median 6.2%10.1%6.6%
Retirement Social Security
44
Heavy Equip Mechanic EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Auto Mechanic 2 $ 8,859 0.0% $ - 10.70% $ 948 1.45% $ 128 $ - $ 9,936 $ 2,540 168$ 23$ -$ 2,732$ 12,667$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Vehicle and Equipment Mechanic $ 8,216 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,396 1.45% $ 119 $ 509 $10,240 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 13,951$
City & County of San Francisco NC
City of Daly City Mechanic $ 6,488 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 771 1.45% $ 94 $ - $ 7,353 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 8,660$
City of Napa Equipment Mechanic $ 6,489 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 683 1.45% $ 94 $ 100 $ 7,366 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 9,299$
Contra Costa Water District NC $ 7,420 1.00% $ 74 8.07% $ 599 7.65% $ 568 $ 260 $ 8,921 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 11,085$
County of Sonoma Heavy Equipment Mechanic II $ 6,047 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 539 7.65% $ 463 $ 208 $ 7,258 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 9,095$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Maintenance Mechanic II 8,038$ 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 988 7.65% $ 615 $ 281 $ 9,923 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 12,087$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Fleet Mechanic $ 8,309 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 970 7.65% $ 636 $ 208 $10,123 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 11,960$
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Vehicle Mechanic with CL A 1/ $ 7,672 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 594 7.65% $ 587 $175 $ 9,028 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 11,567$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Equipment Mechanic II $ 8,069 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 806 1.45% $ 117 $ 83 $ 9,075 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 10,944$
Union Sanitary District Fleet Mechanic II $ 8,695 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 765 1.45% $ 126 $ - $ 9,585 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 12,068$
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Heavy Equipment Mechanic $ 7,374 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 549 7.65% $ 564 $ - $ 8,487 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 11,243$
EBMUD Heavy Equipment Mechanic 7,755$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,121 7.65% $ 593 -$ $ 9,470 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,479$
Mean 7,640$ 8,941$ 11,219$
Median 7,855$ 9,051$ 11,405$
EBMUD to Mean 1.5%5.9%2.3%
EBMUD to Median -1.3%4.6%0.7%
Retirement Social Security
45
Heavy Equip Operator EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District NC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Construction Equipment Operator $ 8,022 0.00% $ - 16.99% $ 1,363 1.45% $ 116 $ 497 $ 9,999 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 13,709$
City & County of San Francisco Operating Engineer Universal $ 8,329 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 858 7.65% $ 637 $ - $ 9,824 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 11,763$
City of Daly City Street Maintenance Worker II $ 5,705 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 678 1.45% $ 83 $ - $ 6,466 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 7,773$
City of Napa Heavy Equipment Operator $ 6,180 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 651 1.45% $ 90 $ 100 $ 7,021 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 8,953$
Contra Costa Water District Multi-skilled Equipment Operator $ 7,072 1.00% $ 71 8.07% $ 571 7.65% $ 541 $ 212 $ 8,184 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 10,322$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Maintenance Worker III $ 5,832 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 520 7.65% $ 446 $ 146 $ 6,944 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 9,378$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District Heavy Equipment Operator $ 7,324 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 671 7.65% $ 560 $ - $ 8,555 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 10,410$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Heavy Duty Equipment Operator with
CLA
$ 8,396 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 650 7.65% $ 642 $175 $ 9,864 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 12,403$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Heavy Equipment Operator $ 8,684 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 867 1.45% $ 126 $ 83 $ 9,760 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 11,630$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District Collection Systems Tech II/Equip Op $ 6,954 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 812 1.45% $ 101 $ - $ 7,867 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 10,903$
West County Wastewater District Collection Crew Member II $ 6,513 1.00% $ 65 12.70% $ 827 1.45% $ 94 $ - $ 7,499 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 9,098$
Zone 7 Water Agency NC
EBMUD Heavy Equipment Operator 7,378$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,067 7.65% $ 564 -$ $ 9,009 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,019$
Mean 7,183$ 8,362$ 10,577$
Median 7,072$ 8,184$ 10,410$
EBMUD to Mean 2.7%7.7%4.2%
EBMUD to Median 4.3%10.1%5.8%
Retirement Social Security
46
Instrument Tech EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Instrument Technician $ 9,791 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 1,048 1.45% $ 142 $ - $10,981 $ 2,517 168$ 23$ -$ 2,708$ 13,690$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Instrument Technician $ 9,030 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,534 1.45% $ 131 $ 560 $11,255 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 14,966$
City & County of San Francisco Electronic Maintenance Technician $ 9,527 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 982 7.65% $ 729 $ - $11,237 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 13,176$
City of Daly City Instrument Technician $ 8,671 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 1,030 1.45% $ 126 $ - $ 9,827 $ 1,150 $ 108 $ 13 $ - 1,271$ 11,098$
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District Instrumentation Technician $ 8,987 1.00% $ 90 8.07% $ 725 7.65% $ 688 $ 270 $10,400 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 12,538$
County of Sonoma Electrician / Instrumentation
Technician
$ 9,402 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 839 7.65% $ 719 $ 235 $11,196 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 13,630$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Electrical/Instrumentation Technician II $ 8,256 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 1,015 7.65% $ 632 $ 289 $10,191 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 12,356$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Instrument Technician $ 9,536 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 1,113 7.65% $ 730 $ 208 $11,587 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 13,424$
Marin Municipal Water District Controls Technician I $ 7,610 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 697 7.65% $ 582 $ - $ 8,889 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 10,744$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District I and C Technician $ 9,398 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 728 7.65% $ 719 $175 $11,020 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 13,559$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Controls Systems Technician II $ 9,123 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 911 1.45% $ 132 $ 83 $10,249 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 12,119$
Union Sanitary District Instrument Technician Electrician $ 9,562 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 841 1.45% $ 139 $ - $10,542 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 13,025$
Vallejo Sanitation District Electrical Electronic Maintenance
Person
$ 8,464 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 988 1.45% $ 123 $ - $ 9,574 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 12,611$
West County Wastewater District Senior Maint/Instrumentation Tech $ 8,430 1.00% $ 84 12.70% $ 1,070 1.45% $ 122 $ - $ 9,706 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 11,305$
Zone 7 Water Agency Instrument Technician II, Zone 7 $ 9,253 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 689 7.65% $ 708 $ - $10,650 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 13,405$
EBMUD Instrument Technician 8,559$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,238 7.65% $ 655 -$ $10,451 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,461$
Mean 9,003$ 10,487$ 12,776$
Median 9,123$ 10,542$ 13,025$
EBMUD to Mean -4.9%-0.3%-2.5%
EBMUD to Median -6.2%-0.9%-4.3%
Retirement Social Security
47
Janitor EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District NC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Custodian $ 4,990 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 514 7.65% $ 382 $ - $5,886 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 7,825$
City of Daly City Custodian $ 5,249 0.0% $ - 11.88% $ 624 1.45% $ 76 $ - $5,949 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 7,256$
City of Napa Custodian $ 4,677 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 493 1.45% $ 68 $ 100 $5,338 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 7,270$
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma Janitor $ 3,649 0.0% $ - 8.92% $ 326 7.65% $ 279 $ 91 $4,345 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 6,779$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Custodian $ 4,571 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 354 7.65% $ 350 $175 $5,449 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 7,988$
Santa Clara Valley Water District NC
Union Sanitary District Janitor $ 5,192 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 457 1.45% $ 75 $ - $5,724 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 8,207$
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Janitor $ 3,728 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 278 7.65% $ 285 $ - $4,291 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 7,046$
EBMUD Janitor 4,972$ 0.00% $ -14.46% $ 719 7.65% $ 380 -$ $6,071 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 8,081$
Mean 4,579$ 5,283$ 7,482$
Median 4,677$ 5,449$ 7,270$
EBMUD to Mean 8.6%14.9%8.0%
EBMUD to Median 6.3%11.4%11.2%
Retirement Social Security
48
Lab Tech II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Laboratory Technician II $ 7,894 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 845 1.45% $ 114 $ - $ 8,853 $ 2,565 168$ 23$ -$ 2,756$ 11,609$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Water Quality Technician II $ 7,300 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 752 7.65% $ 558 $ - $ 8,611 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 10,549$
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa Laboratory Technician $ 6,439 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 678 1.45% $ 93 $ 100 $ 7,310 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 9,243$
Contra Costa Water District Laboratory Technician (Base) $ 7,488 1.00% $ 75 8.07% $ 604 7.65% $ 573 $ 225 $ 8,665 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 10,803$
County of Sonoma Public Health Laboratory
Technician II
$ 4,226 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 377 7.65% $ 323 $ 106 $ 5,032 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 7,466$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District Laboratory Technician $ 7,983 0% $ - 11.68% $ 932 7.65% $ 611 $ 208 $ 9,734 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 11,571$
Marin Municipal Water District Laboratory Technician $ 7,311 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 669 7.65% $ 559 $ - $ 8,540 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 10,395$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District NC
Santa Clara Valley Water District Laboratory Technician II $ 7,488 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 748 1.45% $ 109 $ 83 $ 8,428 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 10,297$
Union Sanitary District Laboratory Analyst $ 8,880 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 781 1.45% $ 129 $ - $ 9,790 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 12,273$
Vallejo Sanitation District Laboratory Technician II $ 7,770 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 907 1.45% $ 113 $ - $ 8,790 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 11,826$
West County Wastewater District Laboratory Analyst $ 8,398 1.00% $ 84 12.70% $ 1,066 1.45% $ 122 $ - $ 9,670 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 11,268$
Zone 7 Water Agency Water Quality Laboratory
Technician, Zone 7
$ 7,355 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 548 7.65% $ 563 $ - $ 8,465 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 11,221$
EBMUD Laboratory Technician II 6,854$ 0.00% $ -14.46% $ 991 7.65% $ 524 -$ $ 8,369 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 10,379$
Mean 7,378$ 8,491$ 10,710$
Median 7,488$ 8,638$ 11,012$
EBMUD to Mean -7.1%-1.4%-3.1%
EBMUD to Median -8.5%-3.1%-5.8%
Retirement Social Security
49
Maint Machinist EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable
Classification
Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District NC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Machinist $ 8,821 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,499 1.45% $ 128 $ 547 $ 10,994 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 14,705$
City & County of San Francisco Maintenance Machinist $ 7,466 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 769 7.65% $ 571 $ - $ 8,806 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 10,745$
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma NC
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Plant Mechanic $ 8,670 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 671 7.65% $ 663 $175 $ 10,180 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 12,719$
Santa Clara Valley Water District NC
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency NC
EBMUD Maintenance Machinist 8,353$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,208 7.65% $ 639 -$ $ 10,200 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,209$
Mean 8,319$ 9,993$ 12,723$
Median 8,670$ 10,180$ 12,719$
EBMUD to Mean 0.4%2.1%-4.0%
EBMUD to Median -3.7%0.2%-4.0%
Retirement Social Security
50
Pipeline Welder III EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District NC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Pipe Welder $ 8,896 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 917 7.65% $ 681 $ - $10,493 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 12,432$
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma WELDER $ 6,047 0.0% $ - 8.92% $ 539 7.65% $ 463 $ 151 $ 7,201 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 9,635$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District Welder/Fabricator $ 8,102 0% $ - 9.16% $ 742 7.65% $ 620 $ - $ 9,464 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 11,319$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Plant Mechanic Welder $ 9,214 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 713 7.65% $ 705 $175 $10,808 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 13,347$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Welder II $ 8,684 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 867 1.45% $ 126 $ 83 $ 9,760 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 11,630$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Blacksmith-Welder $ 7,374 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 549 7.65% $ 564 $ - $ 8,487 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 11,243$
EBMUD Pipeline Welder III 7,567$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,094 7.65% $ 579 -$ $ 9,240 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,249$
Mean 8,053$ 9,369$ 11,601$
Median 8,393$ 9,612$ 11,474$
EBMUD to Mean -6.0%-1.4%-3.0%
EBMUD to Median -9.8%-3.9%-2.0%
Retirement Social Security
51
Plant Maint Mech EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Utility Mechanic II $ 8,859 0.0% $ - 10.70% $ 948 1.45% $ 128 $ - $ 9,936 $ 2,540 168$ 23$ -$ 2,732$ 12,667$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Maintenance Technician
Trainee II
$ 7,650 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,300 1.45% $ 111 $ 474 $ 9,535 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 13,246$
City & County of San Francisco General Utility Mechanic $ 7,776 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 801 7.65% $ 595 $ - $ 9,172 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 11,111$
City of Daly City Plant & Equipment
Maintenance Mechanic
$ 7,051 0.0% $ - 11.88% $ 838 1.45% $ 102 $ - $ 7,991 $ 1,150 $ 144 $ 13 $ - 1,307$ 9,298$
City of Napa Plant Maintenance Mechanic II $ 6,812 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 717 1.45% $ 99 $ 100 $ 7,729 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 9,661$
Contra Costa Water District Maintenance Mechanic 8,465$ 1.00% $ 85 8.07% $ 683 7.65% $ 648 $ 254 $ 9,796 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 11,934$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Mechanic $ 8,465 0.0% $ - 8.92% $ 755 7.65% $ 648 $ 212 $10,079 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 12,513$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Maintenance Mechanic II $ 8,038 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 988 7.65% $ 615 $ 281 $ 9,923 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 12,087$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Mechanic II $ 8,575 0% $ - 11.68% $ 1,001 7.65% $ 656 $ 208 $10,440 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 12,277$
Marin Municipal Water District Mechanic Electrical
Maintenance Worker
$ 7,633 0% $ - 9.16% $ 699 7.65% $ 584 $ - $ 8,916 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 10,771$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Mechanic $ 7,242 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 561 7.65% $ 554 $175 $ 8,532 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 11,071$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Plant Maintenance Mechanic II $ 8,469 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 846 1.45% $ 123 $ 83 $ 9,521 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 11,391$
Union Sanitary District Mechanic II $ 8,796 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 773 1.45% $ 128 $ - $ 9,697 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 12,180$
Vallejo Sanitation District Maintenance Mechanic II $ 7,298 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 852 1.45% $ 106 $ - $ 8,256 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 11,292$
West County Wastewater District Maintenance Technician $ 6,845 1.00% $ 68 12.70% $ 869 1.45% $ 99 $ - $ 7,881 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 9,480$
Zone 7 Water Agency Plant Mechanic,Zone 7 $ 8,263 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 616 7.65% $ 632 $ - $ 9,510 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 12,266$
EBMUD Plant Maintenance Mechanic 7,755$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,121 7.65% $ 593 -$ $ 9,470 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,479$
Mean 7,890$ 9,182$ 11,453$
Median 7,907$ 9,516$ 11,662$
EBMUD to Mean -1.7%3.1%0.2%
EBMUD to Median -1.9%-0.5%-1.6%
Retirement Social Security
52
Sr Systems Programmer EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC $ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Sr Information Systems Analyst $ 12,577 2.5% $ 314 10.70% $ 1,346 1.45% $ 182 $ - $14,420 $ 2,447 168$ 23$ -$ 2,639$ 17,059$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District System Administrator $ 9,255 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,572 1.45% $ 134 $ 574 $11,536 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - $ 220 3,831$ 15,366$
City & County of San Francisco IS Programmer Analyst-Senior $ 8,985 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 926 7.65% $ 687 $ - $10,598 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 12,537$
City of Daly City Senior Network Administrator $ 10,803 0% $ - 11.88% $ 1,283 1.45% $ 157 $ - $12,243 $ 1,150 $ - $ 13 1,163$ 13,406$
City of Napa Systems Administrator $ 9,032 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 951 1.45% $ 131 $ 100 $10,214 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 12,147$
Contra Costa Water District Senior Systems Analyst $ 10,937 3.0% $ 328 8.07% $ 883 7.65% $ 816 $ 328 $12,636 1,907$ $ 170 $ 17 $ 50 2,144$ 14,780$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Senior Network Analyst $ 8,808 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 786 7.65% $ 674 $ 264 $10,595 1,907$ $ 178 $ 17 $ 50 2,152$ 12,747$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Computer Analyst $ 9,633 0% $ - 12.29% $ 1,184 7.65% $ 737 $ 337 $11,892 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 14,056$
Dublin San Ramon Service District Information Technology Analyst II $ 11,416 0% $ - 11.68% $ 1,333 7.65% $ 823 $ 208 $13,780 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 15,617$
Marin Municipal Water District Information Systems Analyst III $ 10,259 0% $ - 9.16% $ 939 7.65% $ 785 $ - $11,983 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 13,838$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Senior IT Systems Analyst $ 8,185 1.75% $ 143 7.74% $ 634 7.65% $ 626 $ 167 $ 9,755 $ 2,136 $ 162 14$ -$ 2,312$ 12,067$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Information Systems Analyst III $ 10,844 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 1,083 1.45% $ 157 $ 83 $12,167 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 14,037$
Union Sanitary District Senior Information Technology Analyst $ 10,598 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 932 1.45% $ 154 $ - $11,684 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 14,167$
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Senior Systems Analyst $ 12,038 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 897 7.65% $ 832 $ - $13,767 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 16,522$
EBMUD Senior Systems Programmer 10,687$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,545 7.65% $ 818 -$ $13,050 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 15,059$
Mean 10,241$ 11,948$ 14,168$
Median 10,429$ 11,937$ 14,046$
EBMUD to Mean 4.4%9.2%6.3%
EBMUD to Median 2.5%9.3%7.2%
Retirement Social Security
53
Storekeeper II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Storekeeper II $ 7,583 0.0% $ - 10.70% $ 812 1.45% $ 110 $ - $ 8,505 $ 2,572 168$ 23$ -$ 2,763$ 11,268$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Materials Coordinator $ 6,779 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,152 1.45% $ 98 $ 420 $ 8,450 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 12,160$
City & County of San Francisco Storekeeper $ 5,226 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 538 7.65% $ 400 $ - $ 6,164 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 8,103$
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa Storeskeeper $ 5,962 0.0% $ - 10.53% $ 628 1.45% $ 86 $ 100 $ 6,776 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 8,708$
Contra Costa Water District Storekeeper $ 7,134 1.00% $ 71 8.07% $ 576 7.65% $ 546 $ 214 $ 8,256 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 10,394$
County of Sonoma Storekeeper $ 4,070 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 363 7.65% $ 311 $ 122 $ 4,816 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 7,250$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Warehouse Technician I $ 6,979 0.00% $ - 12.29% $ 858 7.65% $ 534 $ 244 $ 8,615 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 10,779$
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District Warehouse Worker II $ 5,973 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 547 7.65% $ 457 $ - $ 6,977 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 8,832$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Material Specialist II $ 5,957 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 461 7.65% $ 456 $175 $ 7,049 $ 2,370 $ 155 14$ -$ 2,539$ 9,588$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Inventory Control Technician II $ 7,127 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 712 1.45% $ 103 $ 83 $ 8,026 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 9,896$
Union Sanitary District Storekeeper I $ 8,332 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 733 1.45% $ 121 $ - $ 9,186 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 11,669$
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency NC
EBMUD Storekeeper II 6,366$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 921 7.65% $ 487 -$ $ 7,774 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 9,783$
Mean 6,466$ 7,529$ 9,877$
Median 6,779$ 8,026$ 9,896$
EBMUD to Mean -1.5%3.2%-1.0%
EBMUD to Median -6.1%-3.1%-1.1%
Retirement Social Security
54
Survey Tech II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District NC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Survey Assistant II $ 7,482 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 771 7.65% $ 572 $ - $ 8,825 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 10,764$
City of Daly City NC
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma NC
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District NC
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Survey Engineering Tech $ 6,497 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 503 7.65% $ 497 $ 50 $ 7,547 $ 2,396 151$ 14$ 4$ 2,565$ 10,112$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Asst Surveyor III $ 8,069 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 806 1.45% $ 117 $ 83 $ 9,075 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 10,944$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Survey Technician III $ 8,086 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 602 7.65% $ 619 $ - $ 9,307 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 12,063$
EBMUD Survey Tech II 7,755$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,121 7.65% $ 593 -$ $ 9,470 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,479$
Mean 7,533$ 8,688$ 10,971$
Median 7,775$ 8,950$ 10,854$
EBMUD to Mean 2.9%9.0%4.6%
EBMUD to Median -0.3%5.8%5.8%
Retirement Social Security
55
Water Dist Operator SR EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District Advanced Treatment Facilities
Operator
$ 9,742 0.0% $ - 10.70% $ 1,043 1.45% $ 141 $ - $10,926 $ 2,518 168$ 23$ -$ 2,709$ 13,636$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District NC
City & County of San Francisco Senior Stationary Engineer $ 8,506 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 876 7.65% $ 651 $ - $10,033 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 11,972$
City of Daly City Senior Water/Wastewater
Operator
$ 8,620 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 1,024 1.45% $ 125 $ - $ 9,769 $ 1,480 $ 108 $ 13 $ - 1,601$ 11,369$
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District Senior Distribution Operator $ 8,351 1.00% $ 84 8.07% $ 674 7.65% $ 639 $ 251 $ 9,664 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 11,802$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Senior Plant
Operator
$ 9,307 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 830 7.65% $ 712 $ 279 $10,933 1,907$ $ 178 $ 17 $ 50 2,152$ 13,085$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service District Water/Wastewater Systems
Operator IV
$ 9,249 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 1,080 7.65% $ 708 $ 208 $11,245 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 13,082$
Marin Municipal Water District Senior Distribution Systems Operator $ 8,697 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 796 7.65% $ 665 $ - $10,159 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 12,014$
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Senior Distribution System
Operator
$ 10,937 0.00% $ - 7.74% $ 847 7.65% $ 837 $ 50 $12,671 $ 2,396 151$ 14$ 4$ 2,565$ 15,236$
Santa Clara Valley Water District Senior Water Resources
Technician
$ 9,825 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 981 1.45% $ 142 $ 83 $11,031 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 12,901$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater District NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Water Plant Operator III, Zone 7 $ 8,566 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 638 7.65% $ 655 $ - $ 9,860 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 12,615$
EBMUD Sr Water Distribution Operator 8,995$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,301 7.65% $ 688 -$ $10,984 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,993$
Mean 9,180$ 10,629$ 12,771$
Median 8,973$ 10,542$ 12,758$
EBMUD to Mean -2.0%3.3%1.7%
EBMUD to Median 0.2%4.2%1.8%
Retirement Social Security
56
Water Dist Plumber III EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water
District
Utility Worker II $ 7,583 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 2,141 1.45% $ 110 $ - $ 9,835 $ 2,572 168$ 23$ -$ 2,763$ 12,598$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District
NC
City & County of San
Francisco
Utility Plumber $ 8,896 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 917 7.65% $ 681 $ - $10,493 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 12,432$
City of Daly City Distribution Maintenance Worker
II
$ 5,705 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 678 1.45% $ 83 $ - $ 6,466 $ 1,480 $ - $ 13 $ - 1,492$ 7,958$
City of Napa Water Facilities Worker II $ 5,597 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 589 1.45% $ 81 $ 100 $ 6,368 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 8,300$
Contra Costa Water District Crew Leader - Field $ 7,606 1.00% $ 76 8.07% $ 614 7.65% $ 582 $ 228 $ 8,802 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 10,940$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Maintenance
Worker II
$ 5,032 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 449 7.65% $ 385 $ 151 $ 5,942 $ 1,706 $ 111 $ 17 600$ 2,434$ 8,376$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service NC
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility
District
NC
Santa Clara Valley Water
District
NC
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater
District
NC
Zone 7 Water Agency NC
EBMUD Water Distribution Plumber III 7,202$ 0.00% $ -14.46% $ 1,041 7.65% $ 551 -$ $ 8,794 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 10,804$
Mean 6,737$ 7,984$ 10,101$
Median 6,644$ 7,634$ 9,658$
EBMUD to Mean 6.9%10.1%7.0%
EBMUD to Median 8.4%15.2%11.9%
Retirement Social Security
57
Water Treatment Operator (Sr)EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Survey Agency Comparable Classification Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water
District
Advanced Water Treatment
Facilities Operator
$ 9,742 0.00% $ - 10.70% $ 1,043 1.45% $ 141 $ - $10,926 $ 2,518 168$ 23$ -$ 2,709$ 13,636$
Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District
NC
City & County of San
Francisco
Senior Stationary Engineer,
Sewage Plant
$ 9,367 0.00% $ - 10.30% $ 965 7.65% $ 717 $ - $11,049 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 12,987$
City of Daly City Sr Water/Wastewater Operator $ 9,677 0.00% $ - 11.88% $ 1,149 1.45% $ 140 $ - $10,967 $ 1,480 $ 108 $ 13 $ - 1,601$ 12,568$
City of Napa Senior Water Treatment Facility
Operator
$ 8,180 0.00% $ - 10.53% $ 861 1.45% $ 119 $ 100 $ 9,260 $ 1,795 137$ -$ -$ 1,932$ 11,193$
Contra Costa Water District Senior Water Treatment Plant
Operator
$ 10,168 1.00% $ 102 8.07% $ 821 7.65% $ 778 $ 305 $11,766 1,907$ $ 164 $ 17 $ 50 2,138$ 13,904$
County of Sonoma Water Agency Senior Plant
Operator
$ 9,307 0.00% $ - 8.92% $ 830 7.65% $ 712 $ 279 $10,951 1,907$ $ 178 $ 17 $ 50 2,152$ 13,103$
Delta Diablo Sanitation District NC
Dublin San Ramon Service
District
NC
Marin Municipal Water District Treatment Plant System
Operator IV
$ 8,828 0.00% $ - 9.16% $ 808 7.65% $ 675 $ - $10,312 $ 1,661 174$ 21$ -$ 1,855$ 12,167$
Sacramento Municipal Utility
District
NC
Santa Clara Valley Water
District
Senior Water Plant Operator $ 9,825 0.00% $ - 9.99% $ 981 1.45% $ 142 $ 83 $11,031 $ 1,698 148$ 24$ -$ 1,870$ 12,901$
Union Sanitary District NC
Vallejo Sanitation District NC
West County Wastewater
District
NC
Zone 7 Water Agency Water Plant Operator III, Zone 7 $ 8,566 0.00% $ - 7.45% $ 638 7.65% $ 655 $ - $ 9,860 $ 2,501 $ 124 39$ 92$ 2,756$ 12,615$
EBMUD Senior Water Treatment
Operator
8,995$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,301 7.65% $ 688 -$ $10,984 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 12,993$
Mean 9,296$ 10,680$ 12,786$
Median 9,367$ 10,951$ 12,901$
EBMUD to Mean -3.2%2.8%1.6%
EBMUD to Median -4.0%0.3%0.7%
Retirement Social Security
58
Wastewater Plant Operator II EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY
APRIL 2017
Agency Match Class Monthly
Maximum
Salary
Def
Comp
Total
Cash
Health
(HMO
family)
Dental Vision Supple
mental
Total
Health
Total
Cash +
Health
EPMC
%
EPMC
$
ER Cost
%
ER Cost
$
%$
Alameda County Water District NC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District
PLANT OPERATOR II $ 8,022 0.0% $ - 16.99% $ 1,363 1.45% $ 116 $ 497 $ 9,999 $ 3,397 $ 214 $ - 100$ 3,711$ 13,709$
City & County of San Francisco STATIONARY ENGINEER
SEWAGE TREATMENT
$ 8,275 0.0% $ - 10.30% $ 853 7.65% $ 633 $ - $ 9,761 $ 1,760 $ 179 $ - $ - 1,939$ 11,699$
City of Daly City WATER/WASTEWATER
OPERATOR II
$ 8,325 0% $ - 11.88% $ 989 1.45% $ 121 $ - $ 9,435 $ 1,480 $ - $ 13 $ - 1,492$ 10,927$
City of Napa NC
Contra Costa Water District NC
County of Sonoma NC
Delta Diablo Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment
Plant Operator - Grade II
$ 8,038 0% $ - 12.29% $ 988 7.65% $ 615 $ 281 $ 9,923 $ 1,907 $ 227 30$ -$ 2,164$ 12,087$
Dublin San Ramon Service District WW TREAT PLANT
OPERATOR II
$ 8,409 0% $ - 11.68% $ 982 7.65% $ 643 $ 208 $10,242 $ 1,640 168$ 29$ -$ 1,837$ 12,079$
Marin Municipal Water District NC
Sacramento Municipal Utility
District
NC
Santa Clara Valley Water District NC
Union Sanitary District PLANT OPERATOR II $ 8,317 0.00% $ - 8.79% $ 731 1.45% $ 121 $ - $ 9,169 $ 2,316 144$ 23$ -$ 2,483$ 11,652$
Vallejo Sanitation District PLANT OPERATOR II $ 7,404 0.00% $ - 11.68% $ 864 1.45% $ 107 $ - $ 8,376 $ 2,762 $ 232 43$ -$ 3,037$ 11,412$
West County Wastewater District Plant Operator $ 7,362 0.00% $ - 12.70% $ 935 1.45% $ 107 $ - $ 8,404 $ 1,478 108$ 13$ -$ 1,599$ 10,002$
Zone 7 Water Agency NC
EBMUD WASTEWATER PLANT
OPERATOR II
8,148$ 0.00% $ - 14.46% $ 1,178 7.65% $ 623 -$ $ 9,950 1,686$ 224$ 23.85 75$ 2,009$ 11,959$
Mean 8,019$ 9,413$ 11,696$
Median 8,157$ 9,598$ 11,676$
EBMUD to Mean 1.6%5.7%2.2%
EBMUD to Median -0.1%3.7%2.4%
Retirement Social
Security
59