The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOutside Emails April 2024 - April 20251 From:Hanh, Hannah Sent:Tuesday, June 25, 2024 9:01 AM To:dcobb@lee-associates.com Cc:Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: 1150 Laurel Lane Hi Dan, Below are responses in blue to your questions. 1. Any plans and permits in place for the properties, if available. The property includes an extensive range of under review/issued permits, including multiple commercial tenant improvements, fire improvements, site work, plan revisions, etc. There are also permits for a total of 75 residential units – the permit to construct 31 units has been issued and the permit to construct 44 units is pending issuance (i.e., payment by the applicant). If you would like to obtain copies of plans, please let me know the exact set of plans you would like. I will refer you to our administrative staff for assistance. Note – permission by the owner, architect, engineer, etc. must be obtained before those construction documents can be released. 2. Need the property tax bills from the County The City does not maintain property tax bill information. However, any publicly accessible information can be found on the County’s website using the following link: https://services.slocountytax.org/ 3. All entitlement documents for the property including site plans, proposed rendering, etc. Most of the active construction work is associated with a project approved in 2020, referred to as Laurel Creek, which allowed the construction of 100 residential units within the existing building at 1150 Laurel Lane. Here is the link to the staff report, which includes the entitlement plans as an attachment, for your reference. As mentioned, the City has received building permit applications for 75 units. Regarding Laurel Garden – this project proposes a full-buildout to add ~450 units and ~18,000 SF of commercial space in multiple buildings throughout the 17-acre site (comprises of four adjacent parcels). Since this application was submitted in April 2023 and has only undergone one round of completeness review, it is not ready for a public hearing, so I do not have plans or additional information to share. During completeness review, staff reviews the project for consistency with City policies and regulations, which may result in substantial design revisions and require additional information. The applicant has been working on finalizing the project scope. 4. List of architects and entitlement consultants who have worked on the project This is not information that the City requests for, or keeps records of, as part of application submittals. I recommend reaching out to the project representative, provided below, for a list of their project consultants. Chuck Braff – (310) 990-6897, chuck@westpacinv.com 5. A list of any outstanding fees that need to be paid to reinstated I am not sure what this request is referring to. For planning entitlements, payment is taken upon application submittal. If there are building permits that are expired, extension requests would be assessed on a case by case basis with the Building Official as they come up. 2 Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Dan Cobb <dcobb@lee-associates.com> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 4:51 PM To: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Cc: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: 1150 Laurel Lane This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Hannah, I wanted to confirm that you received this and wanted to see if you could give me an ETA? thanks, Dan Dan Cobb Associate Lee & Associates | Central California O 661.631.0391 C 310.5082378 dcobb@lee-associates.com Corporate ID 02215506 | License ID 01335209 5401 Business Park South | Suite 122 Bakersfield , California 93309 View Our Research | Join Lee & Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Any information, including third party information, shall be verified as the accuracy and recipient shall be responsible for verifying a ny and all information as to its accuracy. Electronic Communication: This email shall stand alone and cannot be consolidated or integrated with other correspondences to form a contract. 3 From: Dan Cobb <dcobb@lee-associates.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 12:36 PM To: hhanh@slocity.org <hhanh@slocity.org> Cc: mpatino@slocity.org <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: 1150 Laurel Lane 1. Hi Hannah, last week I spoke with Mallory at the desk, and she was super helpful as you were in a meeting. She asked that I connect with you to request the following information. Please let me know if you can provide the following. 1. Any plans and permits in place for the properties, if available. 2. Need the property tax bills from the County 3. All entitlement documents for the property including site plans, proposed rendering, etc. 4. List of architects and entitlement consultants who have worked on the project 5. A list of any outstanding fees that need to be paid to reinstated And any other info you think might be helpful. Thanks, Dan Dan Cobb Associate Lee & Associates | Central California O 661.631.0391 C 310.5082378 dcobb@lee-associates.com Corporate ID 02215506 | License ID 01335209 5401 Business Park South | Suite 122 Bakersfield , California 93309 View Our Research | Join Lee & Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Any information, including third party information, shall be verified as the accuracy and recipient shall be responsible for verifying a ny and all information as to its accuracy. Electronic Communication: This email shall stand alone and cannot be consolidated or integrated with other correspondences to form a contract. 1 From:Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 3, 2024 3:41 PM To:Nelson, Trevor Cc:Loew, Michael Subject:Re: Laurel - Mobilizing Thank you both. Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 On Jul 3, 2024, at 3:16 PM, Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org> wrote: Chuck, Please see the attached. TCO for Suite #175 updated with 30-day extension. Thank you, Trevor Nelson Supervising Building Inspector <image001.png> Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tnelson@slocity.org T 805.781.7153 slocity.org <image007.png><image008.png><image009.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 12:24 PM To: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Cc: Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Laurel - Mobilizing Hi Chuck, We can update the TCO. I have asked Trevor to help facilitate this. We will be extending for 30 days, and make a determination to extend for additional time based on progress. Thanks! Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official <image001.png> Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org 2 <image010.png><image011.png><image012.png><image013.png><image014.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 9:10 AM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Laurel - Mobilizing Please let me know if we’ll get formal paperwork. CalFire among others are looking for something formal. We have insulation scheduled for Monday in the TI space. I texted with Trevor and he said he could pop out next week to inspect the insulation. Then onto RC channel and drywall to complete the floor/ ceiling assembly. Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 On Jun 7, 2024, at 8:10 AM, Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Chuck, Thank you for speaking with me and updating me on the project. As we discussed, the TCO's will be extended so long as work is occurring, and progress is being made. We will send updated TCO's when Trevor returns next week and is able to confirm and document progress through the inspection process. Thanks again, Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 3:05 PM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Laurel - Mobilizing This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Pat has a meeting tomorrow am. Hoping to get something. I know it’s last day of school but if possible we f we could get something before 930am that would be ideal. Chuck 3 310.990.6897 Sent from my iPhone. On Jun 6, 2024, at 12:28 PM, Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> wrote: Grader has started to bring equipment on site. First piece just pulled in. Got the drywaller coming on Tuesday to do a walk with me and hoping Trevor can be there too. Same drywaller that performed the work on Kiva so he’s familiar. As discussed please share email regarding TCO extension today if possible. Thank you, Chuck <image0.jpeg> Chuck 310.990.6897 Sent from my iPhone. <1150 Laurel Ln 175_BLDG-0188-2021_TCO 7.3.24.pdf> Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Building Address:1150 Laurel Ln SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Unit/Suite N175 APN:004-962-018Permit Number: BLDG-0188-2021 Project Description: TI TO AN EXISTING OFFICE SPACE-CAL FIRE Occupancy Group: Type of Const.:Fire Sprinkler Provided: Business, professional offices (B) III-B Yes Code Year: 2019 Occupant Load: 48 Conditions of Approval: Fire Final Approval required. Building Final Approval required. Prework permit BLDG-2051-2020 and AMMR permits BLDG-2361-2020, BLDG-0813-2021 must be finaled prior to Final Approval. Surety Bond Type:Amount: Building Owner:LAUREL CREEK LP 505 BATH St, SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101Owner's Address: Chief Building Official City of San Luis Obispo This temporary certificate is issued pursuant to Section 111.3 of the 2013 California Building Code and attests that at the time of issuance, this structure or portion thereof was inspected for compliance with the requirements of this code for the occupancy and use specified herein, and was determined to be safe for temporary occupancy. If the Limitations/ Conditions of Approval listed above are not satisfied or if final approval is not obtained from the Building & Safety Division by the expiration date this certificate will become null and void and continued occupancy of the building will no longer be authorized. Date Issued: Expiration Date:August 02, 2024 July 03, 2024 1 From:Nelson, Trevor Sent:Wednesday, July 3, 2024 3:16 PM To:Chuck Braff Cc:Loew, Michael Subject:RE: Laurel - Mobilizing Attachments:1150 Laurel Ln 175_BLDG-0188-2021_TCO 7.3.24.pdf Chuck, Please see the attached. TCO for Suite #175 updated with 30-day extension. Thank you, Trevor Nelson Supervising Building Inspector Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tnelson@slocity.org T 805.781.7153 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 12:24 PM To: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Cc: Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Laurel - Mobilizing Hi Chuck, We can update the TCO. I have asked Trevor to help facilitate this. We will be extending for 30 days, and make a determination to extend for additional time based on progress. Thanks! Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org 2 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 9:10 AM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Laurel - Mobilizing Please let me know if we’ll get formal paperwork. CalFire among others are looking for something formal. We have insulation scheduled for Monday in the TI space. I texted with Trevor and he said he could pop out next week to inspect the insulation. Then onto RC channel and drywall to complete the floor/ ceiling assembly. Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 On Jun 7, 2024, at 8:10 AM, Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Chuck, Thank you for speaking with me and updating me on the project. As we discussed, the TCO's will be extended so long as work is occurring, and progress is being made. We will send updated TCO's when Trevor returns next week and is able to confirm and document progress through the inspection process. Thanks again, Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 3:05 PM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Laurel - Mobilizing This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Pat has a meeting tomorrow am. Hoping to get something. I know it’s last day of school but if possible we f we could get something before 930am that would be ideal. Chuck 310.990.6897 3 Sent from my iPhone. On Jun 6, 2024, at 12:28 PM, Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> wrote: Grader has started to bring equipment on site. First piece just pulled in. Got the drywaller coming on Tuesday to do a walk with me and hoping Trevor can be there too. Same drywaller that performed the work on Kiva so he’s familiar. As discussed please share email regarding TCO extension today if possible. Thank you, Chuck <image0.jpeg> Chuck 310.990.6897 Sent from my iPhone. 1 From:Loew, Michael Sent:Wednesday, September 4, 2024 4:50 PM To:Chuck Braff Cc:Nelson, Trevor; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:RE: Laurel - CalFire TCO Attachments:BLDG-0188-2021 TCO.pdf Chuck, Please find the updated TCO attached. I am concerned about the lack of progress being made on this site. I will only extend the TCO’s until 10/15 to give you time to set up a meeting with us to go over the plan to complete this project. The meeting will need to take place onsite, and we will need to see that progress is being made on fire line. If we cannot meet these deadlines, we will be revoking your current occupancies. Director Timothea Tway will also be involved in these conversations moving forward. I have cc’d her to this email. Thank you, Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Building Address:1150 Laurel Ln SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Unit/Suite N175 APN:004-962-018Permit Number: BLDG-0188-2021 Project Description: TI TO AN EXISTING OFFICE SPACE-CAL FIRE Occupancy Group: Type of Const.:Fire Sprinkler Provided: Business, professional offices (B) III-B Yes Code Year: 2019 Occupant Load: 48 Conditions of Approval: Fire Final Approval required. Building Final Approval required. Prework permit BLDG-2051-2020 and AMMR permits BLDG-2361-2020, BLDG-0813-2021 must be finaled prior to Final Approval. Work on the fire line must commence by October 15, 2024 Surety Bond Type:Amount: Building Owner:LAUREL CREEK LP 505 BATH St, SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101Owner's Address: Chief Building Official City of San Luis Obispo This temporary certificate is issued pursuant to Section 111.3 of the 2013 California Building Code and attests that at the time of issuance, this structure or portion thereof was inspected for compliance with the requirements of this code for the occupancy and use specified herein, and was determined to be safe for temporary occupancy. If the Limitations/ Conditions of Approval listed above are not satisfied or if final approval is not obtained from the Building & Safety Division by the expiration date this certificate will become null and void and continued occupancy of the building will no longer be authorized. Date Issued: Expiration Date:October 15, 2024 September 04, 2024August 1, 2024 1 From:Greg Gibson <ggibson@arkanda.co> Sent:Thursday, September 12, 2024 7:48 AM To:Business, Tax Subject:Re: City of SLO Application Accepted- Payment and Form Due Attachments:Zoning_Application_completed.pdf Flag Status:Completed This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Please find attached a completed Zoning and Building Clearance form. Please note I am simply renting a desk at Office Hours, a coworking rental site. We do not have any other facilities or locations. I am the only employee and we have no customer visits. On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 4:50 PM <bt@slocity.org> wrote: The City of San Luis Obispo has received your Business License Application. The taxes and/or fees have been calculated and are awaiting payment. Please pay the total below within 7 days to complete the process. Your account number and the WEB Pin are below the Web link. Upon application of your payment, your Business License certificate will be mailed. In order to process the application, you will need to submit a Zoning and Building Clearance form. You can attach one in a response to this email. https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/23784/637015716830670000 Total Balance Due: 226.57 To pay for your business license, please go to: https://businessrenewal.slocity.org/PrimeWeb/Pay/Pay1/BusinessLicense Account No.: WEB Pin.: Thank you for doing business in the City of San Luis Obispo. Finance Department City of San Luis Obispo FINANCE & IT DEPARTMENT Please send remittance to: 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 The Finance Dept. is open from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday (except holidays). Have a question? Phone us at: (805) 781-7134 Email us at: bt@slocity.org Fax us at: (805) 781-7401 Telecommunications Device for the Deaf: (805) 781-7410 For information about the City, or to complete a business tax application, visit our Website at: www.slocity.org The business tax certificate must be renewed annually by July 31st or the business owner will be considered in violation of the City’s Municipal Code and penalties will be assessed. Additionally, late charges of 1.5% of the outstanding balance or $15 (whichever is greater) will apply to all account balances when payment is not received within 30 days and will be reassessed each 30 days thereafter when a balance remains outstanding. All returned checks will be assessed a service charge and the certificate will be nullified. ZONING & BUILDING CLEARANCE (For Businesses within the city limits of San Luis Obispo) Your Business License/Tax Certificate will not be processed until your business location has been approved. Please contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT at (805) 781-7170, or visit us at 919 Palm Street, for assistance in filling out this form. Our office is open from 8 a.m. to noon and 1 to 3 p.m. Monday through Friday (except holidays). Business Name: Business Address: Previous Business Name: Previous Address: Contact Name: Daytime Phone: IF ONLY THE BUSINESS NAME OR OWNERSHIP HAS CHANGED, YOU MAY STOP HERE. FOR ALL OTHER CHANGES, PLEASE COMPLETELY FILL OUT THIS FORM. Former Tenant: Describe Adjacent Tenants: Extent of alterations/tenant improvements planned: Is your business located on: Ground Floor Upper Floor Are you sharing space with another existing business? Yes No If yes, with whom? Are you operating as an independent contractor leasing space at an existing business? Yes No If yes, with what business? Approx. floor area occupied by your business: sq. ft. Area devoted to outdoor storage: sq. ft. Total number of off-street parking spaces provided exclusively for the business*: * If the business shares off-street parking with another business, please provide a running total of the site’s parking requirements (maintained by the property owner). Estimated number of employees: Full-time: Part-time: Extent of customer visitation: Will your business create any nuisance (i.e. noise, odors, or waste products)? Yes No If yes, what kind? STAFF USE ONLY What zone is this business in? Occupancy Class: Total number of off-street parking spaces required by the City: Zoning Regulations Classification: Is this business allowed in this zone? Yes, permit not required. Yes, with a permit. Date Approved: _________________________ Approved By: (Planning)(Date) (Building)(Date) Notes to file: If your business is located within the city limits of San Luis Obispo, please complete the last page of this application. Your application cannot be processed without this information. Docusign Envelope ID: 53EB5C1A-3B3D-4345-AE45-69495660DC67 X I rent a desk in a co-working space 805-400-3225 Arkanda LLC Greg Gibson 1150 Laurel Lane Ste 180 SLO CA 93401 None X (Office Hours is the name of the workspace company) Various (co-working) N/A 1 1 X 0 None X 12 Office Hours 1 From:Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent:Thursday, October 17, 2024 2:06 PM To:Loew, Michael Cc:Heather Wiebe Subject:Re: Laurel - EV Charging Stations Attachments:EV Charging Changes.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Michael - We are working our way through cost to complete with the lender’s consultants and I wanted to clarify where we are with the EV stations. It was discussed that the stations as designed were spread out over the site and that we could group the first phase of EV charging stations to better serve the 31 and to keep costs reasonable. I wanted to confirm that this is still the case. Thank you. Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 On Sep 11, 2023, at 6:11 PM, Charles Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> wrote: Michael - I wanted to set up a call to discuss the EV charging requirements at Laurel. More specifically the locations. The idea here is to simplify the design given the phasing. Rather than run the infrastructure to the entire site. We are hoping we can do a 2 phase approach to the locations where the 31 would be grouped and the 44 would complete the site wide charging stations. Please see attached. Please let me know a good time to chat. <EV Charging Changes.pdf> Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 FOR JOINTUTILITY TRENCHES WHERE APPLICABLE.PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMTHE NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM TO EV CHARGINGTRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS. SEE THESINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE ANDQUANTITY.NOT USED.PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM PANEL EV1A FOR FUTURE EV CHARGINGDISTRIBUTION PANEL. SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMSHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE AND QUANTITY.PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMPANEL EV1A TO EV CHARGING DISTRIBUTION PANEL(S).SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.FUTURE EV CHARGER DISTRIBUTION PANEL.NOT USED.NOT USED.PULLBOX FOR "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING SPACES, 30" x48", FLUSH IN GRADE, TRAFFIC RATED. BOX WILL BE USEDFOR FUTURE PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION AS A PULLPOINT TO RELOCATE CHARGING LOCATIONS INSTALLEDUNDER THIS PROJECT'S SCOPE. COORDINATE EXACTLOCATION WITH THE ARCHITECT.FOR INSTALLED "EV READY" CHARGING STATION(S) (NOTSHOWN), PROVIDE "EV READY" RACEWAY, CONDUCTORS,BOX, AND CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR DEDICATED BRANCHCIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB 5.106.5.3 ASAPPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATING U.O.N..)COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURALPLANS.FOR "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING STATION(S) (NOT SHOWN)PROVIDE "EV CAPABLE" RACEWAY, BOX, AND CIRCUITBREAKER SPACE FOR FUTURE DEDICATED BRANCHCIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB 5.106.5.3 ASAPPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATING U.O.N..)COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURALPLANS.FOR INSTALLED "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING STATION(S) INPHASE 1 (NOT SHOWN) THAT WILL BE "EV READY"CHARGING STATION(S) IN PHASE 2, PROVIDE "EV READY"RACEWAY, BOX, AND CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR DEDICATEDBRANCH CIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB5.106.5.3 AS APPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATINGU.O.N..) COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITHARCHITECTURAL PLANS.COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ARCHITECT.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINECONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SIZES FOR EV "READY" ANDEV "CAPABLE" CIRUITS FOR NO MORE THAN 3% VOLTAGEDROP (VD). (CEC 210.19 (A) INFORMATIONAL NOTE 4 ANDCEC 215.2 (A)(1)(b) INFORMATIONAL NOTE 2.)123456PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMTHE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM TO EV CHARGINGTRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS. SEE THESINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE ANDQUANTITY.7PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM THE NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR FUTURE EVCHARGING TRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS.SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.8PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM THE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR FUTURE EVCHARGING TRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS.SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.91011121314151617181920SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"SITE PLANFRONT13(E) ELECTRICAL ROOM4FRONT 2341916(N) EASTELECTRICAL ROOM(N) NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM.22121517192017(F) EV2BTT-EV2EV1A2017(F) EV1C1916165195102019111219191811515TSBSBSBSBSB23(zE2)HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7(zE2)(zE2)(zE2)(zE2)1KJHGFEDCBAKJHGFEDCBA23456789101112123456789101112ARCHITECT OF RECORD/CONSULTANTADDRESS1327 ARCHER STREET, SUITE 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401CONTACT805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COMTHOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT #C27608STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT #C33672T H E I N C L U D E D D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N S , I D E A S , D E S I G N S & A R R A N G E M E N T S R E P R E S E N T E D T H E R E B Y A R E A N D S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S A N D N O P A R T T H E R E O F S H A L L B E C O P I E D , D I S C L O S E D T O O T H E R S O R U S E D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H A N Y W O R K O R P R O J E C T O T H E R T H A N T H E S P E C I F I C P R O J E C T F O R W H I C H T H E Y H A V E B E E N P R E P A R E D A N D D E V E L O P E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E C O N C L U S I V E E V I D E N C E O F A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . S U B M I T T A L O F T H E S E D O C U M E N T S F O R P U B L I C A G E N C Y R E V I E W S H A L L N O T B E C O N S I D E R E D A W A I V E R O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S ' R I G H T S . A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 0 8 -2 0 2 0 4/29/2021PLAN CHECK #11DATEREVISION#A20048PROJECTDECEMBER 15, 2020DATESHEETPROJECT CLIENT CONSULTANT 09/22/2022PLOT BY: Above Grade PLOT DATE: Sep 22, 2022 - 3:07pm Drawing name: N:\2020\20067-LaurelCreek-WarehouseApartments\Electrical\Condocs-Elec\Sheetfiles-Elec\20067-E1.01~E1.02_Site.DWG E1.027/22/2021APARTMENT ADDENDUM #189/24/2021PLAN CHECK #3WAREHOUSE REMODEL 1150 LAUREL LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WAREHOUSE APARTMENTS - PHASE 1 LAUREL CREEK LLC 1150 LAUREL LANE STE. 120 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 (714)368-7724 5/27/2022REVISION TO PERMIT199/2/2022REVISION TO PERMIT23SITE PLAN November 3, 2022November 1, 201 November 2, 201 November 6, 201 November 8, 201 REVIEWEDCity of San Luis ObispoBuilding & Safety Division FOR JOINTUTILITY TRENCHES WHERE APPLICABLE.PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMTHE NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM TO EV CHARGINGTRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS. SEE THESINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE ANDQUANTITY.NOT USED.PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM PANEL EV1A FOR FUTURE EV CHARGINGDISTRIBUTION PANEL. SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMSHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE AND QUANTITY.PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMPANEL EV1A TO EV CHARGING DISTRIBUTION PANEL(S).SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.FUTURE EV CHARGER DISTRIBUTION PANEL.NOT USED.NOT USED.PULLBOX FOR "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING SPACES, 30" x48", FLUSH IN GRADE, TRAFFIC RATED. BOX WILL BE USEDFOR FUTURE PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION AS A PULLPOINT TO RELOCATE CHARGING LOCATIONS INSTALLEDUNDER THIS PROJECT'S SCOPE. COORDINATE EXACTLOCATION WITH THE ARCHITECT.FOR INSTALLED "EV READY" CHARGING STATION(S) (NOTSHOWN), PROVIDE "EV READY" RACEWAY, CONDUCTORS,BOX, AND CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR DEDICATED BRANCHCIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB 5.106.5.3 ASAPPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATING U.O.N..)COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURALPLANS.FOR "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING STATION(S) (NOT SHOWN)PROVIDE "EV CAPABLE" RACEWAY, BOX, AND CIRCUITBREAKER SPACE FOR FUTURE DEDICATED BRANCHCIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB 5.106.5.3 ASAPPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATING U.O.N..)COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURALPLANS.FOR INSTALLED "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING STATION(S) INPHASE 1 (NOT SHOWN) THAT WILL BE "EV READY"CHARGING STATION(S) IN PHASE 2, PROVIDE "EV READY"RACEWAY, BOX, AND CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR DEDICATEDBRANCH CIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB5.106.5.3 AS APPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATINGU.O.N..) COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITHARCHITECTURAL PLANS.COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ARCHITECT.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINECONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SIZES FOR EV "READY" ANDEV "CAPABLE" CIRUITS FOR NO MORE THAN 3% VOLTAGEDROP (VD). (CEC 210.19 (A) INFORMATIONAL NOTE 4 ANDCEC 215.2 (A)(1)(b) INFORMATIONAL NOTE 2.)123456PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMTHE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM TO EV CHARGINGTRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS. SEE THESINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE ANDQUANTITY.7PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM THE NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR FUTURE EVCHARGING TRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS.SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.8PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM THE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR FUTURE EVCHARGING TRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS.SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.91011121314151617181920SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"SITE PLANFRONT13(E) ELECTRICAL ROOM4FRONT 2341916(N) EASTELECTRICAL ROOM(N) NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM.22121517192017(F) EV2BTT-EV2EV1A2017(F) EV1C1916165195102019111219191811515TSBSBSBSBSB23(zE2)HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7(zE2)(zE2)(zE2)(zE2)1KJHGFEDCBAKJHGFEDCBA23456789101112123456789101112ARCHITECT OF RECORD/CONSULTANTADDRESS1327 ARCHER STREET, SUITE 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401CONTACT805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COMTHOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT #C27608STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT #C33672T H E I N C L U D E D D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N S , I D E A S , D E S I G N S & A R R A N G E M E N T S R E P R E S E N T E D T H E R E B Y A R E A N D S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S A N D N O P A R T T H E R E O F S H A L L B E C O P I E D , D I S C L O S E D T O O T H E R S O R U S E D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H A N Y W O R K O R P R O J E C T O T H E R T H A N T H E S P E C I F I C P R O J E C T F O R W H I C H T H E Y H A V E B E E N P R E P A R E D A N D D E V E L O P E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E C O N C L U S I V E E V I D E N C E O F A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . S U B M I T T A L O F T H E S E D O C U M E N T S F O R P U B L I C A G E N C Y R E V I E W S H A L L N O T B E C O N S I D E R E D A W A I V E R O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S ' R I G H T S . A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 0 8 -2 0 2 0 4/29/2021PLAN CHECK #11DATEREVISION#A20048PROJECTDECEMBER 15, 2020DATESHEETPROJECT CLIENT CONSULTANT 09/22/2022PLOT BY: Above Grade PLOT DATE: Sep 22, 2022 - 3:07pm Drawing name: N:\2020\20067-LaurelCreek-WarehouseApartments\Electrical\Condocs-Elec\Sheetfiles-Elec\20067-E1.01~E1.02_Site.DWG E1.027/22/2021APARTMENT ADDENDUM #189/24/2021PLAN CHECK #3WAREHOUSE REMODEL 1150 LAUREL LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WAREHOUSE APARTMENTS - PHASE 1 LAUREL CREEK LLC 1150 LAUREL LANE STE. 120 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 (714)368-7724 5/27/2022REVISION TO PERMIT199/2/2022REVISION TO PERMIT23SITE PLAN November 3, 2022November 1, 201 November 2, 201 November 6, 201 November 8, 201 REVIEWEDCity of San Luis ObispoBuilding & Safety Division FOR JOINTUTILITY TRENCHES WHERE APPLICABLE.PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMTHE NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM TO EV CHARGINGTRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS. SEE THESINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE ANDQUANTITY.NOT USED.PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM PANEL EV1A FOR FUTURE EV CHARGINGDISTRIBUTION PANEL. SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMSHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE AND QUANTITY.PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMPANEL EV1A TO EV CHARGING DISTRIBUTION PANEL(S).SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.FUTURE EV CHARGER DISTRIBUTION PANEL.NOT USED.NOT USED.PULLBOX FOR "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING SPACES, 30" x48", FLUSH IN GRADE, TRAFFIC RATED. BOX WILL BE USEDFOR FUTURE PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION AS A PULLPOINT TO RELOCATE CHARGING LOCATIONS INSTALLEDUNDER THIS PROJECT'S SCOPE. COORDINATE EXACTLOCATION WITH THE ARCHITECT.FOR INSTALLED "EV READY" CHARGING STATION(S) (NOTSHOWN), PROVIDE "EV READY" RACEWAY, CONDUCTORS,BOX, AND CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR DEDICATED BRANCHCIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB 5.106.5.3 ASAPPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATING U.O.N..)COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURALPLANS.FOR "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING STATION(S) (NOT SHOWN)PROVIDE "EV CAPABLE" RACEWAY, BOX, AND CIRCUITBREAKER SPACE FOR FUTURE DEDICATED BRANCHCIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB 5.106.5.3 ASAPPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATING U.O.N..)COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURALPLANS.FOR INSTALLED "EV CAPABLE" CHARGING STATION(S) INPHASE 1 (NOT SHOWN) THAT WILL BE "EV READY"CHARGING STATION(S) IN PHASE 2, PROVIDE "EV READY"RACEWAY, BOX, AND CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR DEDICATEDBRANCH CIRCUIT. (REFER TO CGB 4.106.4 AND CGB5.106.5.3 AS APPLICABLE FOR MINIMUM SIZE AND RATINGU.O.N..) COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONS WITHARCHITECTURAL PLANS.COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ARCHITECT.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINECONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SIZES FOR EV "READY" ANDEV "CAPABLE" CIRUITS FOR NO MORE THAN 3% VOLTAGEDROP (VD). (CEC 210.19 (A) INFORMATIONAL NOTE 4 ANDCEC 215.2 (A)(1)(b) INFORMATIONAL NOTE 2.)123456PROVIDE FEEDER (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATION FROMTHE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM TO EV CHARGINGTRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS. SEE THESINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZE ANDQUANTITY.7PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM THE NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR FUTURE EVCHARGING TRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS.SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.8PROVIDE CONDUIT STUB (NOT SHOWN) TO THIS LOCATIONFROM THE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR FUTURE EVCHARGING TRANSFORMER AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS.SEE THE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SHEET E0.11 FOR SIZEAND QUANTITY.91011121314151617181920SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"SITE PLANFRONT13(E) ELECTRICAL ROOM4FRONT 2341916(N) EASTELECTRICAL ROOM(N) NORTH ELECTRICAL ROOM.22121517192017(F) EV2BTT-EV2EV1A2017(F) EV1C1916165195102019111219191811515TSBSBSBSBSB23(zE2)HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7HP2-7(zE2)(zE2)(zE2)(zE2)1KJHGFEDCBAKJHGFEDCBA23456789101112123456789101112ARCHITECT OF RECORD/CONSULTANTADDRESS1327 ARCHER STREET, SUITE 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401CONTACT805.547.2240ARRIS-STUDIO.COMTHOMAS E. JESS ARCHITECT #C27608STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT #C33672T H E I N C L U D E D D R A W I N G S , S P E C I F I C A T I O N S , I D E A S , D E S I G N S & A R R A N G E M E N T S R E P R E S E N T E D T H E R E B Y A R E A N D S H A L L R E M A I N T H E P R O P E R T Y O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S A N D N O P A R T T H E R E O F S H A L L B E C O P I E D , D I S C L O S E D T O O T H E R S O R U S E D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H A N Y W O R K O R P R O J E C T O T H E R T H A N T H E S P E C I F I C P R O J E C T F O R W H I C H T H E Y H A V E B E E N P R E P A R E D A N D D E V E L O P E D W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N C O N S E N T O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S . V I S U A L C O N T A C T W I T H T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S S H A L L C O N S T I T U T E C O N C L U S I V E E V I D E N C E O F A C C E P T A N C E O F T H E S E R E S T R I C T I O N S . S U B M I T T A L O F T H E S E D O C U M E N T S F O R P U B L I C A G E N C Y R E V I E W S H A L L N O T B E C O N S I D E R E D A W A I V E R O F A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S ' R I G H T S . A R R I S S T U D I O A R C H I T E C T S C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 0 8 -2 0 2 0 4/29/2021PLAN CHECK #11DATEREVISION#A20048PROJECTDECEMBER 15, 2020DATESHEETPROJECT CLIENT CONSULTANT 09/22/2022PLOT BY: Above Grade PLOT DATE: Sep 22, 2022 - 3:07pm Drawing name: N:\2020\20067-LaurelCreek-WarehouseApartments\Electrical\Condocs-Elec\Sheetfiles-Elec\20067-E1.01~E1.02_Site.DWG E1.027/22/2021APARTMENT ADDENDUM #189/24/2021PLAN CHECK #3WAREHOUSE REMODEL 1150 LAUREL LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 WAREHOUSE APARTMENTS - PHASE 1 LAUREL CREEK LLC 1150 LAUREL LANE STE. 120 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 (714)368-7724 5/27/2022REVISION TO PERMIT199/2/2022REVISION TO PERMIT23SITE PLAN November 3, 2022November 1, 201 November 2, 201 November 6, 201 November 8, 201 REVIEWEDCity of San Luis ObispoBuilding & Safety Division 1 From:Hanh, Hannah Sent:Wednesday, October 23, 2024 12:22 PM To:Justin Weeks Subject:RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Justin, Thank you for the follow up. Please call my direct line at 805-781-7432. Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 8:40 AM To: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Hannah, Great, thank you for letting me know. I have a few follow-up questions, and it would be great if we could schedule a quick call at 3:30 today. Would you prefer that I call direct? Regards, Justin Weeks, MAI Senior Vice President Valuation Advisory Services KIDDER MATHEWS 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1200, Portland, OR 97204 T 503.721.2733 | C 805.503.3540 justin.weeks@kidder.com | vcard | profile | kidder.com From: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 8:34 AM 2 To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Justin, I wanted to follow up on your voicemail to me regarding this project. I am still the best contact person for any questions and there has been no changes on their application progress since we last spoke about 18 months ago. At this ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Justin, I wanted to follow up on your voicemail to me regarding this project. I am still the best contact person for any questions and there has been no changes on their application progress since we last spoke about 18 months ago. At this time, only one completeness review has been conducted and City staff is still waiting on the applicant to resubmit. I last spoke to the project representative around January 2024 and he intended to continue the application at that time, but I have not heard back since. My morning is a bit full, but I’ll have time later this afternoon to give you a call around 3:30 pm if you have further questions. Thanks, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hanh, Hannah Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 3:12 PM To: justin.weeks@kidder.com Cc: wayne@froboeserealty.com; kevin.thene@kidder.com Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Justin, Below are my responses in blue to your questions. 1. Has a PD overlay for the project been fully approved as of today? As of today, a PD Overlay has not been approved for the project. 2. Has a density transfer of excess development rights from tax parcel 004-962-042 to tax parcels 004-962-036, - 037, -043 been fully approved as of today? As mentioned above, the PD Overlay has not been approved. Through the PD Overlay application, a density transfer between these different parcels can be requested, and this request may be granted as part of the conditional approval. 3 a. If so, please confirm that the approved density transfer allows for tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 to be developed with 318.54 density units on a stand-alone basis as of today. b. If not: i. What is the application/approval status? The Planning Division received the application package for the mixed-use development on April 20, 2023. The application package is currently in the initial 30-day completeness review period. ii. What is required to receive approval for the construction of 318.54 density units on tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 (stand-alone basis)? Due to the scale of the development, multiple Planning application types are required and would be evaluated as a whole for the project. Below are the anticipated application types: - Major Development Review - Planned Development Rezoning (PD Overlay) - Conditional or Minor Use Permit o This application will apply if the mixed-use development proposes any uses that require Use Permit approval to operate in the underlying zones. Staff will determine whether a Use Permit is required after completing the first review of the submittal. - Affordable Housing Incentives/Concessions (associated with the Density Bonus request) - Environmental Review The project will require review by multiple advisory bodies (e.g., Architectural Review Commission, Airport Land Use Commission, and Planning Commission) and final review and approval by the City Council. iii. How long will that take? The length of the overall review process depends on multiple factors. Examples of these factors include: quality and completeness of the application package (consistency with City policies/regulations, responsiveness to comments); environmental review (evaluation of environmental concerns, preparation of the environmental document, public review and comment, etc.); and public hearings (public review and comment). After considering other projects of similar scale and complexity, I am anticipating a minimum of one year for the overall process. If you have any additional questions or need further clarification, please note I am out of the office for the rest of the afternoon and will return Monday morning. Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 4 From: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 11:22 AM To: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Cc: Wayne Froboese <wayne@froboeserealty.com>; Kevin Thene <kevin.thene@kidder.com > Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Hannah, We were provided with a leƩer from you dated 4/25/2023 regarding ResidenƟal Development PotenƟal and Density Transfer for a project at 1150 and 1160 Laurel Lane (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 004- 962-036, -037, -042, and -043). I would like to confirm the current approval status of the density transfer for reporƟng in the appraisal, and I just leŌ you a voicemail. Please note that I am only appraising tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043, which total 8.37 acres, not the four parcel Project Site referenced in your letter. Based on my understanding, the three parcels I am appraising are zoned O-S & M-MU and have a maximum development capacity of 162.60 density units on a stand-alone basis (without a density transfer). This is less than the number of density units for the four parcel Project Site that is stated in your letter. Your leƩer indicates that a PD Overlay allows for the ability to transfer and reallocate density units: 1. Has a PD overlay for the project been fully approved as of today? 2. Has a density transfer of excess development rights from tax parcel 004-962-042 to tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 been fully approved as of today? a. If so, please confirm that the approved density transfer allows for tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 to be developed with 318.54 density units on a stand-alone basis as of today. b. If not: i. What is the application/approval status? ii. What is required to receive approval for the construction of 318.54 density units on tax parcels 004-962- 036, -037, -043 (stand-alone basis)? iii. How long will that take? Regards, Justin Weeks, MAI Senior Vice President Valuation Advisory Services KIDDER MATHEWS 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1200, Portland, OR 97204 T 503.721.2733 | C 805.503.3540 justin.weeks@kidder.com | vcard | profile | kidder.com From: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 5:26 PM To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com>; Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com> Cc: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels EXTERNAL Johnathan – Thank you for the introductions. 5 Justin – It was good speaking to you. I hope our conversation was helpful in your preparation of the appraisal. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any additional questions or need references in the Zoning Regulations or State Density Bonus Law for the project proposal. Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 2:11 PM To: Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com>; Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Cc: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com>; Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hey Johnathan, I spoke with Justin last week, and while I would love to help, I am not able to provide any input on behalf of the City as I am in a conflict of interest due to property I own in the vicinity. I have provided Justin with contact information for Hannah Hanh (cc’d in this email) who is the assigned planner for the property and informed her of the this inquiry. Good luck with this, and hope you are well in all this rain. Kyle Bell CDD Housing Coordinator T 805.781.7524 From: Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 1:59 PM To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Cc: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Subject: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi JusƟn, I’d like to introduce you to Kyle Bell with the City of San Luis Obispo (copied). He should be able to answer your ques Ɵon or help point you in the right direcƟon with respect to your quesƟon on allocaƟon of density units. 6 Kyle – we’re in the process of refinancing the 3 land parcels at Laurel Creek with ARB, and Jus Ɵn is working on the appraisal. JusƟn can explain it more clearly, but in general, he’s looking for confirmaƟon from someone at the city that the warehouse parcel can allocate unused density units to the 3 land parcels. As a reference, we’ve prepared a Density Unit Sharing Agreement (aƩached) between Laurel Creek (warehouse parcel) and Laurel Creek II (land parcels) to further describe the density unit sharing that is contemplated as part of the overall site development, which lines up with the development plan for the overall site that has been submiƩed for approval. This agreement will be notarized and recorded. Please let me know if you have any ques Ɵons or if there is anything that I can do to assist. I appreciate your help. Thank you, Jonathan Branoff Executive Vice President 1150 Laurel Lane | San Luis Obispo, CA | 93401 jonathan@westpacinv.com O: 805.965.2100 M: 517.505.0083 1 From:Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Sent:Friday, October 25, 2024 12:39 PM To:Hanh, Hannah Subject:RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Hannah, Great, thank you very much. I will circle back if there are any follow-up questions. Regards, Justin Weeks, MAI Senior Vice President Valuation Advisory Services KIDDER MATHEWS 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1200, Portland, OR 97204 T 503.721.2733 | C 805.503.3540 justin.weeks@kidder.com | vcard | profile | kidder.com From: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2024 10:58 AM To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Justin, It was good speaking with you as well. As a follow up to the information in my April 28, 2023 email, I am confirming that my responses in blue still stand. There is a minor change in the application status that is noted in red. I ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Justin, It was good speaking with you as well. As a follow up to the information in my April 28, 2023 email, I am confirming that my responses in blue still stand. There is a minor change in the application status that is noted in red. I am also confirming that there has not been any changes in the City’s Municipal Code that would alter the application process for this project. For your convenience, here are your questions/responses again – with a minor revision to #2(b)(i): 1. Has a PD overlay for the project been fully approved as of today? As of today, a PD Overlay has not been approved for the project. 2. Has a density transfer of excess development rights from tax parcel 004-962-042 to tax parcels 004-962-036, - 037, -043 been fully approved as of today? As mentioned above, the PD Overlay has not been approved. Through the PD Overlay application, a density transfer between these different parcels can be requested, and this request may be granted as part of the conditional approval. 2 a. If so, please confirm that the approved density transfer allows for tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 to be developed with 318.54 density units on a stand-alone basis as of today. b. If not: i. What is the application/approval status? The Planning Division received the application package for the mixed-use development on April 20, 2023. The application package is currently in the initial 30-day completeness review period. The initial completeness review was completed and comments issued back to the applicant on May 19, 2023. The application has since been pending a resubmittal from the applicant. ii. What is required to receive approval for the construction of 318.54 density units on tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 (stand-alone basis)? Due to the scale of the development, multiple Planning application types are required and would be evaluated as a whole for the project. Below are the anticipated application types: - Major Development Review - Planned Development Rezoning (PD Overlay) - Conditional or Minor Use Permit o This application will apply if the mixed-use development proposes any uses that require Use Permit approval to operate in the underlying zones. Staff will determine whether a Use Permit is required after completing the first review of the submittal. - Affordable Housing Incentives/Concessions (associated with the Density Bonus request) - Environmental Review The project will require review by multiple advisory bodies (e.g., Architectural Review Commission, Airport Land Use Commission, and Planning Commission) and final review and approval by the City Council. iii. How long will that take? The length of the overall review process depends on multiple factors. Examples of these factors include: quality and completeness of the application package (consistency with City policies/regulations, responsiveness to comments); environmental review (evaluation of environmental concerns, preparation of the environmental document, public review and comment, etc.); and public hearings (public review and comment). After considering other projects of similar scale and complexity, I am anticipating a minimum of one year for the overall process. Let me know if you need anything else, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 3 From: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2024 9:05 AM To: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Hannah, It was a pleasure speaking with you earlier this week. As a follow up to our conversation, would you mind confirming if anything has changed regarding the application/approval status of this project since your April 2023 email below? Regards, Justin Weeks, MAI Senior Vice President Valuation Advisory Services KIDDER MATHEWS 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1200, Portland, OR 97204 T 503.721.2733 | C 805.503.3540 justin.weeks@kidder.com | vcard | profile | kidder.com From: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 12:22 PM To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Justin, Thank you for the follow up. Please call my direct line at 805-781-7432. Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@ slocity. org T 805. 781. 7432 slocity. org ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Justin, Thank you for the follow up. Please call my direct line at 805-781-7432. Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 8:40 AM To: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels 4 Hi Hannah, Great, thank you for letting me know. I have a few follow-up questions, and it would be great if we could schedule a quick call at 3:30 today. Would you prefer that I call direct? Regards, Justin Weeks, MAI Senior Vice President Valuation Advisory Services KIDDER MATHEWS 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1200, Portland, OR 97204 T 503.721.2733 | C 805.503.3540 justin.weeks@kidder.com | vcard | profile | kidder.com From: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 8:34 AM To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Justin, I wanted to follow up on your voicemail to me regarding this project. I am still the best contact person for any questions and there has been no changes on their application progress since we last spoke about 18 months ago. At this ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Justin, I wanted to follow up on your voicemail to me regarding this project. I am still the best contact person for any questions and there has been no changes on their application progress since we last spoke about 18 months ago. At this time, only one completeness review has been conducted and City staff is still waiting on the applicant to resubmit. I last spoke to the project representative around January 2024 and he intended to continue the application at that time, but I have not heard back since. My morning is a bit full, but I’ll have time later this afternoon to give you a call around 3:30 pm if you have further questions. Thanks, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 5 From: Hanh, Hannah Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 3:12 PM To: justin.weeks@kidder.com Cc: wayne@froboeserealty.com; kevin.thene@kidder.com Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Justin, Below are my responses in blue to your questions. 1. Has a PD overlay for the project been fully approved as of today? As of today, a PD Overlay has not been approved for the project. 2. Has a density transfer of excess development rights from tax parcel 004-962-042 to tax parcels 004-962-036, - 037, -043 been fully approved as of today? As mentioned above, the PD Overlay has not been approved. Through the PD Overlay application, a density transfer between these different parcels can be requested, and this request may be granted as part of the conditional approval. a. If so, please confirm that the approved density transfer allows for tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 to be developed with 318.54 density units on a stand-alone basis as of today. b. If not: i. What is the application/approval status? The Planning Division received the application package for the mixed-use development on April 20, 2023. The application package is currently in the initial 30-day completeness review period. ii. What is required to receive approval for the construction of 318.54 density units on tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 (stand-alone basis)? Due to the scale of the development, multiple Planning application types are required and would be evaluated as a whole for the project. Below are the anticipated application types: - Major Development Review - Planned Development Rezoning (PD Overlay) - Conditional or Minor Use Permit o This application will apply if the mixed-use development proposes any uses that require Use Permit approval to operate in the underlying zones. Staff will determine whether a Use Permit is required after completing the first review of the submittal. - Affordable Housing Incentives/Concessions (associated with the Density Bonus request) - Environmental Review The project will require review by multiple advisory bodies (e.g., Architectural Review Commission, Airport Land Use Commission, and Planning Commission) and final review and approval by the City Council. iii. How long will that take? The length of the overall review process depends on multiple factors. Examples of these factors include: quality and completeness of the application package (consistency with City policies/regulations, responsiveness to comments); environmental review (evaluation of environmental concerns, preparation of the environmental document, public review and comment, etc.); and public hearings (public review and comment). After considering other projects of similar scale and complexity, I am anticipating a minimum of one year for the overall process. 6 If you have any additional questions or need further clarification, please note I am out of the office for the rest of the afternoon and will return Monday morning. Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 11:22 AM To: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Cc: Wayne Froboese <wayne@froboeserealty.com>; Kevin Thene <kevin.thene@kidder.com > Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hi Hannah, We were provided with a leƩer from you dated 4/25/2023 regarding ResidenƟal Development PotenƟal and Density Transfer for a project at 1150 and 1160 Laurel Lane (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 004- 962-036, -037, -042, and -043). I would like to confirm the current approval status of the density transfer for reporƟng in the appraisal, and I just leŌ you a voicemail. Please note that I am only appraising tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043, which total 8.37 acres, not the four parcel Project Site referenced in your letter. Based on my understanding, the three parcels I am appraising are zoned O-S & M-MU and have a maximum development capacity of 162.60 density units on a stand-alone basis (without a density transfer). This is less than the number of density units for the four parcel Project Site that is stated in your letter. Your leƩer indicates that a PD Overlay allows for the ability to transfer and reallocate density units: 1. Has a PD overlay for the project been fully approved as of today? 2. Has a density transfer of excess development rights from tax parcel 004-962-042 to tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 been fully approved as of today? a. If so, please confirm that the approved density transfer allows for tax parcels 004-962-036, -037, -043 to be developed with 318.54 density units on a stand-alone basis as of today. b. If not: i. What is the application/approval status? ii. What is required to receive approval for the construction of 318.54 density units on tax parcels 004-962- 036, -037, -043 (stand-alone basis)? iii. How long will that take? Regards, 7 Justin Weeks, MAI Senior Vice President Valuation Advisory Services KIDDER MATHEWS 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1200, Portland, OR 97204 T 503.721.2733 | C 805.503.3540 justin.weeks@kidder.com | vcard | profile | kidder.com From: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 5:26 PM To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com>; Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com> Cc: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels EXTERNAL Johnathan – Thank you for the introductions. Justin – It was good speaking to you. I hope our conversation was helpful in your preparation of the appraisal. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any additional questions or need references in the Zoning Regulations or State Density Bonus Law for the project proposal. Sincerely, Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 2:11 PM To: Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com>; Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Cc: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com>; Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels Hey Johnathan, I spoke with Justin last week, and while I would love to help, I am not able to provide any input on behalf of the City as I am in a conflict of interest due to property I own in the vicinity. I have provided Justin with contact information for Hannah Hanh (cc’d in this email) who is the assigned planner for the property and informed her of the this inquiry. 8 Good luck with this, and hope you are well in all this rain. Kyle Bell CDD Housing Coordinator T 805.781.7524 From: Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 1:59 PM To: Justin Weeks <justin.weeks@kidder.com> Cc: Bell, Kyle <KBell@slocity.org>; Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Subject: Laurel Creek development - density unit allocation among parcels This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi JusƟn, I’d like to introduce you to Kyle Bell with the City of San Luis Obispo (copied). He should be able to answer your ques Ɵon or help point you in the right direcƟon with respect to your quesƟon on allocaƟon of density units. Kyle – we’re in the process of refinancing the 3 land parcels at Laurel Creek with ARB, and Jus Ɵn is working on the appraisal. JusƟn can explain it more clearly, but in general, he’s looking for confirmaƟon from someone at the city that the warehouse parcel can allocate unused density units to the 3 land parcels. As a reference, we’ve prepared a Density Unit Sharing Agreement (aƩached) between Laurel Creek (warehouse parcel) and Laurel Creek II (land parcels) to further describe the density unit sharing that is contemplated as part of the overall site development, which lines up with the development plan for the overall site that has been submiƩed for approval. This agreement will be notarized and recorded. Please let me know if you have any ques Ɵons or if there is anything that I can do to assist. I appreciate your help. Thank you, Jonathan Branoff Executive Vice President 1150 Laurel Lane | San Luis Obispo, CA | 93401 jonathan@westpacinv.com O: 805.965.2100 M: 517.505.0083 1 From:Hutchinson, Julianna Sent:Friday, November 22, 2024 9:46 AM To:Chuck Braff Cc:Loew, Michael; Nelson, Trevor; Beres, Jason; Tuggle, Todd Subject:1150 Laurel List of Corrections Hi Chuck, Here is the rough list of general building fire and life safety violations found yesterday. - Provide annual fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire hydrant, and fire pump test reports. Fire sprinklers are considered deficient due to an incomplete system with unprotected, unsprinkered areas. - The temporary fire pump has greatly exceeded the allowable number of days it was permitted for operation in lieu of a permanent fire pump. The sites underground fire line and permanent pump are required to be installed. - All fire extinguishers in the building and units are due for their annual service and need updated tags. - Remove dead trees around the property and prune back dead brush/limbs. - Storage space for electrician company, Cal fire, etc. shall have clear exit paths through the storage and to the outside. Space is considered unsafe with unpermitted high piled storage and unclear pathways. - Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and have any chemicals and hazardous materials stored in proper flame cabinets or in other approved areas. No propane storage inside. - Chain and lock fire sprinkler riser valves in the open position where easily accessible to the public. - Place sign on inactive backflow at entry to property indicating it is out of service so that first responders don’t connect to an inactive one.. - Unblock fire hydrant at back of property and provide clear 26’ wide space in front of all onsite fire hydrants. - Secure exterior combustibles/wood storage on site from public access and maintain stacks in accordance with section 315.4 of the 2022 California Fire Code. - Cover exposed electrical wiring in occupied spaces and remove or safely secure wire tripping hazard in event space. - Assembly occupancies, which are your event space and Bang the Drum, shall not have combustible hangings (such as non-fire treated curtains) except in accordance with section 807.2 of the 2022 California Fire Code. Building may have additional items for correction, and I will send you an inspection report when completed. Please let me know if you have any questions and respond with any items you are able to correct in the mean time. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 2:09 PM To:Loew, Michael; Hutchinson, Julianna Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Andrew Bell Subject:Laurel - Fire Department Deficiency Work Status Attachments:Laurel - Fire Deficiency Tracking Sheet.pdf; Inspection - Letter_11_25_2024_0815.pdf; Inspection - Letter_11_25_2024_0828.pdf; Inspection - Letter_11_25_2024_0910.pdf; Inspection - Letter_11_ 25_2024_0935.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ALL- Please see attached the sheet we are using to track open items on the fire deficiency list. I plan to keep you updated by sharing an updated worksheet regularly as we approach fire’s deadline of December 20th. I have also included the Fire Department's letters for completeness in case you have not seen them. How to read our tracking doc: Greyed out items are complete. Yellow highlighted items are well underway and nearing completion. Items without a fill color are items that are moving but are more than a few days out from completion. Julianna- I would like to walk this project again with you prior to the deadline. I am hoping for Tuesday the 17th if you are available. Ideally, we can confirm certain items are complete and any open items we can confirm our approach is in line with your thinking as we approach the 20th. Thank you, Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 Laurel Fire Department Deficiency Tracking Sheet #ITEM STATUS 1 Secure combustibles/ wood storage on site from public access Move existing lumber 10' from property line and 26' away from fire hydrant. May require more fencing, chain and lock. 2 Fire Hydrant - Lumber to be moved to provide access to fire hydrant at back of property See above. 3 Remove Dead Trees from property Proposal received. Approval required. 4 Empire and CalFire warehouse to be piled only to 12' MAX w/ clear exit pathway Empire completed fix. CalFire is working on it. 5 Temp pump is overdue. Complete underground system Team is working to engage Kirk. Will provide schedule to complete fire line. 6 Cover all exposed electrical wiring in occupied spaces. Temp cord removed Last walk revealed 2 boxes left to cover. Cord is being removed/ covered with pedestrian friendly cover. 7 Unfinished fire rated exit hall has exposed wood members (East Corridor)Complete assembly. Walking with sub Wednesday AM. Chuck will call Julianna and Trevor and propose fix. Then complete. 8 Annual Fire Extinguisher Servicing 2 commercial spaces were locked and left to complete. Completing this week. 9 Annual Fire alarm, sprinkler, hydrant and fire pump report Alpha has run all tests. Report is complete and they are to upload to portal. 10 Combustible Hangings to be removed Interior to Bang the Drum - Documents have been emailed to Julianna. Waiting to hear if the tenant needs to provide more information. 11 Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and any other hazardous items COMPLETE Additional 1 Chain and lock fire risers COMPLETE Additional 2 Ceiling tile missing in event space's dedicated exit corridor (nearest Ernest COMPLETE *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783 - 7780 Fax: (805) 543 - 8019 Fire Department Email: FDGeneral@slocity.org Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Business / Occupant:Bang the Drum Address:1150 Laurel Lane 160 Work Phone:310-990-6897 Contact Name:Braff, Chuck Email:chuck@westpacinv.com Thank you for your cooperation with San Luis Obispo City Fire in keeping your business and our community safe! Correct the cited violation(s) by the "Reinspection Date" listed below to avoid further enforcement action including, but not limited to, chargeable re-inspection and/or Administrative Citation. You may request a review of the cited violations by the Department Director [Fire Chief] within 5 days of report issuance if noted violations do not create an immediate danger to health and safety (SLO M.C. 1.24.090). If you have any questions, please contact our Inspection Line at 805/783-7775. Date Completed:11/21/2024 Inspected By:Hutchinson, Julianna Violation Count:4 Inspection Notes: Violations Code Description Comments Reinspection Date 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire protection and life safety systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection and life safety systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed in accordance with Section 901.8. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by these regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with this code and California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment, material or systems to their original normal and operational Provide annual fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire hydrant, and fire pump test reports. Fire sprinklers are considered deficient due to an incomplete system with unprotected, unsprinkered areas. 12/20/2024 San Luis Obispo City Fire Inspection Report Fire Department Information Business / Occupant Information Inspection Information Page 1 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1.14] Maintenance. Every fire alarm system or device, sprinkler system, fire extinguisher, fire hose, fire-resistive assembly or any other fire safety assembly, device, material or equipment installed and retained in service in any building or structure subject to California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations and with their intended use. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.24] Maintenance of Equipment. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (a) All automatic fire extinguishing systems, including systems installed as an alternate to other building requirements, shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the following frequencies. Local authorities may require more frequent inspection, testing and maintenance and additional procedures. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)(1)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (1) Water-based fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the frequencies required by NFPA 25 (2011 edition) including Annexes A, B, C, D, E, F and G as amended by the State of California. (Published as NFPA 25, 2013 California Edition.) [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(b)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (b) When proof of the installation date of standpipe systems or automatic fire sprinkler systems cannot be furnished, such systems shall receive initial testing and maintenance by July 1, 1985. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(a)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (a) All testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems in accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 13195 shall be performed by those licensed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13196.5. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, licensing of fire departments which conduct fire Page 2 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. sprinkler and standpipe system testing and maintenance. (2) Service on fire alarm systems and industrial systems as specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 13196.5(b) and (c) may be conducted without a license. (3) Testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems exempted in writing by the State Fire Marshal, when the building owner or occupant has the staff and equipment to conduct testing and maintenance. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(b)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (b) Any testing and maintenance of automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be performed in accordance with these requirements. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, the requirement that testing and maintenance be performed in accordance with these requirements when a licensee can demonstrate that a system cannot functionally be tested and maintained in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. (2) If at any time a licensee encounters a specialized or modified system which cannot be tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5, the licensee shall contact the State Fire Marshal and test and maintain the system as directed. (A) The intent of this section is to cover automatic fire extinguishing systems as originally designed, installed and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. It is not, however, intended to require that such systems be upgraded to current adopted standards. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(h)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (h) At the time of testing and maintenance, building management shall be consulted to avoid unnecessary disturbance of normal building operation. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(i)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (i) The licensee shall contact the local fire authority having jurisdiction prior to testing and maintenance of a system when required by the local fire authority having jurisdiction to do so. Page 3 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 1003. 6 Means of egress continuity. The path of egress travel along a means of egress shall not be interrupted by a building element other than a means of egress component as specified in this chapter. Obstructions shall not be placed in the minimum width or required capacity of a means of egress component except projections permitted by this chapter. The minimum width or required capacity of a means of egress system shall not be diminished along the path of egress travel. Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and have any chemicals and hazardous materials stored in proper flame cabinets or in other approved areas. No propane storage inside. 12/20/2024 906.1 Where required. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all of the following locations: 1.In new and existing Group A, B, E, F, H, I, L, M, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R-3.1, R-4 and S occupancies. Exception: In Group R-2 occupancies, portable fire extinguishers shall be required only in locations specified in Items 2 through 6 where each dwelling unit is provided with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 1- A:10-B:C. 2.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) distance of travel from commercial cooking equipment and from domestic cooking equipment in Group R-2 college dormitory occupancies. 3.In areas where flammable or combustible liquids are stored, used or dispensed. 4.On each floor of structures under construction, except Group R-3 occupancies, in accordance with Section 3316.1. 5.Where required by the sections indicated in Table 906.1. 6.Special-hazard areas, including but not limited to laboratories, computer rooms and generator rooms, where required by the fire code official. 7.Large and small family day-care homes shall be equipped with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating. 8.Where required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. 9.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) of domestic cooking equipment located in a Group I-2. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.29(a) through (d)] Portable Fire Extinguishing Equipment. (a)General. Portable fire extinguishers conforming to the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 3, shall be installed and maintained in accordance with guides established therein. (b)Special Coverage. Additional Class A, B and C units of adequate extinguishing potential shall be provided for any other hazard, as determined by the enforcing agency. (c)Group A Occupancies. (1)One additional Class 2-A unit shall be provided in Group A Occupancies as follows: (A)On each side of the stage or platform. Exception: Platforms 1000 square feet or less in area need have only one such extinguishing unit. Annual service required for all fire extinguishers. 12/20/2024 Page 4 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. (B)On each side of every fly gallery. (C)In basements beneath the stage or platform. (D)In every hallway or passageway leading to a dressing room. (E)In every property room, carpenter shop or similar workroom. (2)Not less than one 10-B:C unit (not less than 4-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) shall be provided: (A)For each motor and fan room. (B)Adjacent to each switchboard on the stage or platform. (C)For each motion picture machine in projection rooms. Exception: One 20-B:C unit (not less than 8-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) in each projection room may be accepted as providing substantially equal protection. (3)The enforcing agency may allow modifications or deviations relative to the number and location of portable fire extinguishers as required by this section provided such authority finds that the basic intent of this section and the ease of accessibility to extinguishers is otherwise achieved. (d)Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 Occupancies. In Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 occupancies, a continuously attached garden hose, equipped with a water flow control nozzle, may be provided in lieu of one or more required fire extinguishers when acceptable to the enforcing agency. The location and length of such hose shall be as designated or approved by the enforcing agency. NOTE: It is recommended that, wherever possible, portable fire extinguishers be located adjacent to manual fire alarm sending stations. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §565(a)] Selection of Fire Extinguishers. (a)The selection of extinguishers for a given situation shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction in accordance with adopted codes or ordinances. The character of the fires anticipated, the construction and occupancy of the individual property, the vehicle or hazard to be protected, ambient-temperature conditions and other factors shall be considered. The number, size, placement and limitations of use of extinguishers required shall be determined by using California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Sections 567 through 573. Exception: Portable fire extinguishers are not required at normally unmanned Group U occupancy buildings or structures where a portable fire extinguisher suitable to the hazard of the location is provided on the vehicle of visiting personnel. 807.2 Combustible decorative materials. In Groups A, B, E, I, M and R-1 and in dormitories in Group R-2, curtains, draperies, fabric Assembly occupancies shall not have combustible hangings (such as non-fire treated curtains) except in accordance with section 12/20/2024 Page 5 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. hangings and other similar combustible decorative materials suspended from walls or ceilings shall comply with Section 807.3 and shall not exceed 10 percent of the specific wall or ceiling area to which such materials are attached. Fixed or movable walls and partitions, paneling, wall pads and crash pads applied structurally or for decoration, acoustical correction, surface insulation or other purposes shall be considered to be interior finish, shall comply with Section 803 and shall not be considered decorative materials or furnishings. Exceptions: 1.In auditoriums in Group A, the permissible amount of curtains, draperies, fabric hangings and similar combustible decorative material suspended from walls or ceilings shall not exceed 75 percent of the aggregate wall area where the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, and where the material is installed in accordance with Section 803.15 of the California Building Code. 2.In Group R-2 dormitories, within sleeping units and dwelling units, the permissible amount of curtains, draperies, fabric hangings and similar decorative materials suspended from walls or ceilings shall not exceed 50 percent of the aggregate wall areas where the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1. 3.In Group B and M occupancies, the amount of combustible fabric partitions suspended from the ceiling and not supported by the floor shall comply with Section 807.3 and shall not be limited. 4. The 10-percent limit shall not apply to curtains, draperies, fabric hangings and similar combustible decorative materials used as window coverings. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.08]. Decorative Materials. In every Group A, E, I, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 occupancy, all drapes, hangings, curtains, drops and all other decorative material, including Christmas trees, that would tend to increase the fire and panic hazard shall be made from a nonflammable material, or shall be treated and maintained in a flame-retardant condition by means of a flame-retardant solution or process approved by the State Fire Marshal, as set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 8. Exits, exit lights, fire alarm sending stations, wet standpipe hose cabinets and fire extinguisher locations shall not be concealed, in whole or in part, by any decorative material. Exceptions: (a) Cubical curtains and individual patient room window curtains and drapes in Group I, R-2.1, R- 3.1 and R-4 occupancies. (b) Window curtains and drapes within dwelling 807.2 of the 2022 California Fire Code. Provide documentation that large curtain in Bang the Drum is fire treated. Page 6 of 7 units of Group R-1 and R-2 occupancies. (c) Christmas trees within dwelling units of Group R-1 and R-2 occupancies. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1273.1] Fabrics for Interior Use. Fabrics as described in California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, 1272(c) intended for interior use shall be tested in their original condition only and shall meet the requirements for fire resistance outlined in California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Section 1273.3. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1273.2] Fabrics for Exterior Use. Fabrics as described in California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, 1272(c) intended for exterior use shall meet the requirements for fire resistance outlined in California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, 1273.3, and, in addition, they shall meet the requirements for fire resistance outlined in California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, 1237, both in their original state and after accelerated weathering. Inspection Documents Violation Documents *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Page 7 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783 - 7780 Fax: (805) 543 - 8019 Fire Department Email: FDGeneral@slocity.org Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Business / Occupant:SLO City Church Address:1150 Laurel Lane 118, 120, 124, 126, 128 Work Phone:310-990-6897 Contact Name:Braff, Chuck Email:chuck@westpacinv.com Thank you for your cooperation with San Luis Obispo City Fire in keeping your business and our community safe! Correct the cited violation(s) by the "Reinspection Date" listed below to avoid further enforcement action including, but not limited to, chargeable re-inspection and/or Administrative Citation. You may request a review of the cited violations by the Department Director [Fire Chief] within 5 days of report issuance if noted violations do not create an immediate danger to health and safety (SLO M.C. 1.24.090). If you have any questions, please contact our Inspection Line at 805/783-7775. Date Completed:11/21/2024 Inspected By:Hutchinson, Julianna Violation Count:3 Inspection Notes: Violations Code Description Comments Reinspection Date 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire protection and life safety systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection and life safety systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed in accordance with Section 901.8. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by these regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with this code and California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment, material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1.14] Maintenance. Every fire alarm system or device, sprinkler system, fire extinguisher, fire hose, fire- resistive assembly or any other fire safety assembly, device, material or equipment installed and retained in service in any building or structure subject to California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance Provide annual fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire hydrant, and fire pump test reports. Fire sprinklers are considered deficient due to an incomplete system with unprotected, unsprinkered areas. 12/21/2024 San Luis Obispo City Fire Inspection Report Fire Department Information Business / Occupant Information Inspection Information Page 1 of 4 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations and with their intended use. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.24] Maintenance of Equipment. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (a) All automatic fire extinguishing systems, including systems installed as an alternate to other building requirements, shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the following frequencies. Local authorities may require more frequent inspection, testing and maintenance and additional procedures. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)(1)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (1) Water-based fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the frequencies required by NFPA 25 (2011 edition) including Annexes A, B, C, D, E, F and G as amended by the State of California. (Published as NFPA 25, 2013 California Edition.) [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(b)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (b) When proof of the installation date of standpipe systems or automatic fire sprinkler systems cannot be furnished, such systems shall receive initial testing and maintenance by July 1, 1985. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(a)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (a) All testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems in accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 13195 shall be performed by those licensed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13196.5. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, licensing of fire departments which conduct fire sprinkler and standpipe system testing and maintenance. (2) Service on fire alarm systems and industrial systems as specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 13196.5(b) and (c) may be conducted without a license. (3) Testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems exempted in writing by the State Fire Marshal, when the building owner or occupant has the staff and equipment to conduct testing and maintenance. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(b)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (b) Any testing and maintenance of automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be performed in accordance with these requirements. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, the requirement that testing and maintenance be performed in accordance with these requirements when a licensee can demonstrate that a system cannot functionally be tested and maintained in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. (2) If at any time a licensee encounters a specialized or modified system which cannot be tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5, the licensee shall contact the State Fire Marshal and test and maintain the system as directed. (A) The intent of this section is to cover automatic fire extinguishing systems as originally designed, installed and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. It is not, however, intended to require that such systems be upgraded to current adopted standards. Page 2 of 4 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(h)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (h) At the time of testing and maintenance, building management shall be consulted to avoid unnecessary disturbance of normal building operation. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(i)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (i) The licensee shall contact the local fire authority having jurisdiction prior to testing and maintenance of a system when required by the local fire authority having jurisdiction to do so. 1003. 6 Means of egress continuity. The path of egress travel along a means of egress shall not be interrupted by a building element other than a means of egress component as specified in this chapter. Obstructions shall not be placed in the minimum width or required capacity of a means of egress component except projections permitted by this chapter. The minimum width or required capacity of a means of egress system shall not be diminished along the path of egress travel. Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and have any chemicals and hazardous materials stored in proper flame cabinets or in other approved areas. No propane storage inside. 12/21/2024 906.1 Where required. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all of the following locations: 1.In new and existing Group A, B, E, F, H, I, L, M, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R- 3.1, R-4 and S occupancies. Exception: In Group R-2 occupancies, portable fire extinguishers shall be required only in locations specified in Items 2 through 6 where each dwelling unit is provided with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 1-A:10-B:C. 2.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) distance of travel from commercial cooking equipment and from domestic cooking equipment in Group R-2 college dormitory occupancies. 3.In areas where flammable or combustible liquids are stored, used or dispensed. 4.On each floor of structures under construction, except Group R-3 occupancies, in accordance with Section 3316.1. 5.Where required by the sections indicated in Table 906.1. 6.Special-hazard areas, including but not limited to laboratories, computer rooms and generator rooms, where required by the fire code official. 7.Large and small family day-care homes shall be equipped with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating. 8.Where required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. 9.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) of domestic cooking equipment located in a Group I-2. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.29(a) through (d)] Portable Fire Extinguishing Equipment. (a)General. Portable fire extinguishers conforming to the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 3, shall be installed and maintained in accordance with guides established therein. (b)Special Coverage. Additional Class A, B and C units of adequate extinguishing potential shall be provided for any other hazard, as determined by the enforcing agency. (c)Group A Occupancies. (1)One additional Class 2-A unit shall be provided in Group A Occupancies as follows: (A)On each side of the stage or platform. Exception: Platforms 1000 square feet or less in area need have only one such extinguishing unit. (B)On each side of every fly gallery. (C)In basements beneath the stage or platform. (D)In every hallway or passageway leading to a dressing room. (E)In every property room, carpenter shop or similar workroom. Annual fire extinguisher maintenance due. 12/21/2024 Page 3 of 4 (2)Not less than one 10-B:C unit (not less than 4-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) shall be provided: (A)For each motor and fan room. (B)Adjacent to each switchboard on the stage or platform. (C)For each motion picture machine in projection rooms. Exception: One 20-B:C unit (not less than 8-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) in each projection room may be accepted as providing substantially equal protection. (3)The enforcing agency may allow modifications or deviations relative to the number and location of portable fire extinguishers as required by this section provided such authority finds that the basic intent of this section and the ease of accessibility to extinguishers is otherwise achieved. (d)Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 Occupancies. In Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R- 4 occupancies, a continuously attached garden hose, equipped with a water flow control nozzle, may be provided in lieu of one or more required fire extinguishers when acceptable to the enforcing agency. The location and length of such hose shall be as designated or approved by the enforcing agency. NOTE: It is recommended that, wherever possible, portable fire extinguishers be located adjacent to manual fire alarm sending stations. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §565(a)] Selection of Fire Extinguishers. (a)The selection of extinguishers for a given situation shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction in accordance with adopted codes or ordinances. The character of the fires anticipated, the construction and occupancy of the individual property, the vehicle or hazard to be protected, ambient-temperature conditions and other factors shall be considered. The number, size, placement and limitations of use of extinguishers required shall be determined by using California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Sections 567 through 573. Exception: Portable fire extinguishers are not required at normally unmanned Group U occupancy buildings or structures where a portable fire extinguisher suitable to the hazard of the location is provided on the vehicle of visiting personnel. Inspection Documents Violation Documents *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Page 4 of 4 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783 - 7780 Fax: (805) 543 - 8019 Fire Department Email: FDGeneral@slocity.org Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Business / Occupant:Event Space Address:1150 Laurel Lane 115 Work Phone:310-990-6897 Contact Name:Braff, Chuck Email:chuck@westpacinv.com Thank you for your cooperation with San Luis Obispo City Fire in keeping your business and our community safe! Correct the cited violation(s) by the "Reinspection Date" listed below to avoid further enforcement action including, but not limited to, chargeable re-inspection and/or Administrative Citation. You may request a review of the cited violations by the Department Director [Fire Chief] within 5 days of report issuance if noted violations do not create an immediate danger to health and safety (SLO M.C. 1.24.090). If you have any questions, please contact our Inspection Line at 805/783-7775. Date Completed:11/21/2024 Inspected By:Hutchinson, Julianna Violation Count:3 Inspection Notes: Violations Code Description Comments Reinspection Date 906.1 Where required. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all of the following locations: 1.In new and existing Group A, B, E, F, H, I, L, M, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R-3.1, R-4 and S occupancies. Exception: In Group R-2 occupancies, portable fire extinguishers shall be required only in locations specified in Items 2 through 6 where each dwelling unit is provided with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 1-A:10-B:C. 2.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) distance of travel from commercial cooking equipment and from domestic cooking equipment in Group R-2 college dormitory occupancies. 3.In areas where flammable or combustible liquids are stored, used or dispensed. 4.On each floor of structures under construction, except Group R-3 occupancies, in accordance with Section 3316.1. 5.Where required by the sections indicated in Table 906.1. Unmounted fire extinguisher in entry space. Mount fire extinguisher and have all fire extinguishers annually serviced. 12/21/2024 San Luis Obispo City Fire Inspection Report Fire Department Information Business / Occupant Information Inspection Information Page 1 of 5 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 6.Special-hazard areas, including but not limited to laboratories, computer rooms and generator rooms, where required by the fire code official. 7.Large and small family day-care homes shall be equipped with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating. 8.Where required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. 9.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) of domestic cooking equipment located in a Group I-2. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.29(a) through (d)] Portable Fire Extinguishing Equipment. (a)General. Portable fire extinguishers conforming to the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 3, shall be installed and maintained in accordance with guides established therein. (b)Special Coverage. Additional Class A, B and C units of adequate extinguishing potential shall be provided for any other hazard, as determined by the enforcing agency. (c)Group A Occupancies. (1)One additional Class 2-A unit shall be provided in Group A Occupancies as follows: (A)On each side of the stage or platform. Exception: Platforms 1000 square feet or less in area need have only one such extinguishing unit. (B)On each side of every fly gallery. (C)In basements beneath the stage or platform. (D)In every hallway or passageway leading to a dressing room. (E)In every property room, carpenter shop or similar workroom. (2)Not less than one 10-B:C unit (not less than 4-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) shall be provided: (A)For each motor and fan room. (B)Adjacent to each switchboard on the stage or platform. (C)For each motion picture machine in projection rooms. Exception: One 20-B:C unit (not less than 8-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) in each projection room may be accepted as providing substantially equal protection. (3)The enforcing agency may allow modifications or deviations relative to the number and location of portable fire extinguishers as required by this section provided such authority finds that the basic intent of this section and the ease of accessibility to extinguishers is otherwise achieved. (d)Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 Occupancies. In Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 occupancies, a continuously attached garden hose, equipped with a water flow control nozzle, may be provided in lieu of one or more required fire extinguishers when acceptable to the enforcing agency. The location and length of such hose shall be as designated or approved by the enforcing agency. NOTE: It is recommended that, wherever possible, portable fire extinguishers be located adjacent to manual fire alarm sending stations. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Page 2 of 5 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. §565(a)] Selection of Fire Extinguishers. (a)The selection of extinguishers for a given situation shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction in accordance with adopted codes or ordinances. The character of the fires anticipated, the construction and occupancy of the individual property, the vehicle or hazard to be protected, ambient-temperature conditions and other factors shall be considered. The number, size, placement and limitations of use of extinguishers required shall be determined by using California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Sections 567 through 573. Exception: Portable fire extinguishers are not required at normally unmanned Group U occupancy buildings or structures where a portable fire extinguisher suitable to the hazard of the location is provided on the vehicle of visiting personnel. 1003. 6 Means of egress continuity. The path of egress travel along a means of egress shall not be interrupted by a building element other than a means of egress component as specified in this chapter. Obstructions shall not be placed in the minimum width or required capacity of a means of egress component except projections permitted by this chapter. The minimum width or required capacity of a means of egress system shall not be diminished along the path of egress travel. Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and remove or safely secure wire tripping hazard in event space. 12/21/2024 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire protection and life safety systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection and life safety systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed in accordance with Section 901.8. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by these regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with this code and California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment, material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1.14] Maintenance. Every fire alarm system or device, sprinkler system, fire extinguisher, fire hose, fire-resistive assembly or any other fire safety assembly, device, material or equipment installed and retained in service in any building or structure subject to California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations and with their intended use. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.24] Maintenance of Equipment. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and Provide annual fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire hydrant, and fire pump test reports. Fire sprinklers are considered deficient due to an incomplete system with unprotected, unsprinkered areas. 12/21/2024 Page 3 of 5 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. all other equipment, material or systems required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (a) All automatic fire extinguishing systems, including systems installed as an alternate to other building requirements, shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the following frequencies. Local authorities may require more frequent inspection, testing and maintenance and additional procedures. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)(1)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (1) Water-based fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the frequencies required by NFPA 25 (2011 edition) including Annexes A, B, C, D, E, F and G as amended by the State of California. (Published as NFPA 25, 2013 California Edition.) [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(b)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (b) When proof of the installation date of standpipe systems or automatic fire sprinkler systems cannot be furnished, such systems shall receive initial testing and maintenance by July 1, 1985. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(a)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (a) All testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems in accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 13195 shall be performed by those licensed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13196.5. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, licensing of fire departments which conduct fire sprinkler and standpipe system testing and maintenance. (2) Service on fire alarm systems and industrial systems as specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 13196.5(b) and (c) may be conducted without a license. (3) Testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems exempted in writing by the State Fire Marshal, when the building owner or occupant has the staff and equipment to conduct testing and maintenance. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(b)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (b) Any testing and maintenance of automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be performed in accordance with these requirements. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, the requirement that testing and maintenance be performed in accordance with these requirements Page 4 of 5 when a licensee can demonstrate that a system cannot functionally be tested and maintained in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. (2) If at any time a licensee encounters a specialized or modified system which cannot be tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5, the licensee shall contact the State Fire Marshal and test and maintain the system as directed. (A) The intent of this section is to cover automatic fire extinguishing systems as originally designed, installed and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. It is not, however, intended to require that such systems be upgraded to current adopted standards. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(h)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (h) At the time of testing and maintenance, building management shall be consulted to avoid unnecessary disturbance of normal building operation. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(i)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (i) The licensee shall contact the local fire authority having jurisdiction prior to testing and maintenance of a system when required by the local fire authority having jurisdiction to do so. Inspection Documents Violation Documents *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Page 5 of 5 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783 - 7780 Fax: (805) 543 - 8019 Fire Department Email: FDGeneral@slocity.org Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Business / Occupant:Earnest Packaging Solutions Address:1150 Laurel Lane 110, 184 Work Phone:310-990-6897 Contact Name:Braff, Chuck Email:chuck@westpacinv.com Thank you for your cooperation with San Luis Obispo City Fire in keeping your business and our community safe! Correct the cited violation(s) by the "Reinspection Date" listed below to avoid further enforcement action including, but not limited to, chargeable re-inspection and/or Administrative Citation. You may request a review of the cited violations by the Department Director [Fire Chief] within 5 days of report issuance if noted violations do not create an immediate danger to health and safety (SLO M.C. 1.24.090). If you have any questions, please contact our Inspection Line at 805/783-7775. Date Completed:11/21/2024 Inspected By:Hutchinson, Julianna Violation Count:3 Inspection Notes: Violations Code Description Comments Reinspection Date 507.5 .3 Private fire service mains and water tanks. Private fire service mains and water tanks shall be periodically inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. 1.Private fire hydrants of all types: Inspection annually and after each operation; flow test and maintenance annually. 2.Fire service main piping: Inspection of exposed, annually; flow test every 5 years. 3.Fire service main piping strainers: Inspection and maintenance after each use. Records of inspections, testing and maintenance shall be maintained. The temporary fire pump has greatly exceeded the allowable number of days it was permitted for operation in lieu of a permanent fire pump. The sites underground fire line and permanent pump are required to be installed. 12/21/2024 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire protection and life safety systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection and life safety systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed in accordance with Section 901.8. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by these regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in Provide annual fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire hydrant, and fire pump test reports. Fire sprinklers are considered deficient due to an incomplete system with unprotected, 12/21/2024 San Luis Obispo City Fire Inspection Report Fire Department Information Business / Occupant Information Inspection Information Page 1 of 4 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. accordance with this code and California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment, material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1.14] Maintenance. Every fire alarm system or device, sprinkler system, fire extinguisher, fire hose, fire- resistive assembly or any other fire safety assembly, device, material or equipment installed and retained in service in any building or structure subject to California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations and with their intended use. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.24] Maintenance of Equipment. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (a) All automatic fire extinguishing systems, including systems installed as an alternate to other building requirements, shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the following frequencies. Local authorities may require more frequent inspection, testing and maintenance and additional procedures. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)(1)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (1) Water-based fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the frequencies required by NFPA 25 (2011 edition) including Annexes A, B, C, D, E, F and G as amended by the State of California. (Published as NFPA 25, 2013 California Edition.) [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(b)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (b) When proof of the installation date of standpipe systems or automatic fire sprinkler systems cannot be furnished, such systems shall receive initial testing and maintenance by July 1, 1985. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(a)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (a) All testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems in accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 13195 shall be performed by those licensed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13196.5. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, licensing of fire departments which conduct fire sprinkler and standpipe system testing and maintenance. (2) Service on fire alarm systems and industrial systems as specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 13196.5(b) and (c) may be conducted without a license. (3) Testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems exempted in writing by the State Fire Marshal, when the building owner or occupant has the staff and equipment to conduct testing and maintenance. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(b)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (b) Any testing and maintenance of automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be performed in accordance with these requirements. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, the requirement that testing and maintenance be performed in accordance with these unsprinkered areas. Page 2 of 4 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. requirements when a licensee can demonstrate that a system cannot functionally be tested and maintained in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. (2) If at any time a licensee encounters a specialized or modified system which cannot be tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5, the licensee shall contact the State Fire Marshal and test and maintain the system as directed. (A) The intent of this section is to cover automatic fire extinguishing systems as originally designed, installed and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. It is not, however, intended to require that such systems be upgraded to current adopted standards. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(h)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (h) At the time of testing and maintenance, building management shall be consulted to avoid unnecessary disturbance of normal building operation. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(i)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (i) The licensee shall contact the local fire authority having jurisdiction prior to testing and maintenance of a system when required by the local fire authority having jurisdiction to do so. 906.1 Where required. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all of the following locations: 1.In new and existing Group A, B, E, F, H, I, L, M, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R- 3.1, R-4 and S occupancies. Exception: In Group R-2 occupancies, portable fire extinguishers shall be required only in locations specified in Items 2 through 6 where each dwelling unit is provided with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 1-A:10-B:C. 2.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) distance of travel from commercial cooking equipment and from domestic cooking equipment in Group R-2 college dormitory occupancies. 3.In areas where flammable or combustible liquids are stored, used or dispensed. 4.On each floor of structures under construction, except Group R-3 occupancies, in accordance with Section 3316.1. 5.Where required by the sections indicated in Table 906.1. 6.Special-hazard areas, including but not limited to laboratories, computer rooms and generator rooms, where required by the fire code official. 7.Large and small family day-care homes shall be equipped with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating. 8.Where required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. 9.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) of domestic cooking equipment located in a Group I-2. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.29(a) through (d)] Portable Fire Extinguishing Equipment. (a)General. Portable fire extinguishers conforming to the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 3, shall be installed and maintained in accordance with guides established therein. (b)Special Coverage. Additional Class A, B and C units of adequate extinguishing potential shall be provided for any other hazard, as determined by the enforcing agency. (c)Group A Occupancies. (1)One additional Class 2-A unit shall be provided in Group A Occupancies as follows: (A)On each side of the stage or platform. Exception: Platforms 1000 square feet or less in area need have only one such extinguishing unit. (B)On each side of every fly gallery. (C)In basements beneath the stage or platform. Annual service due for fire extinguishers. 12/21/2024 Page 3 of 4 (D)In every hallway or passageway leading to a dressing room. (E)In every property room, carpenter shop or similar workroom. (2)Not less than one 10-B:C unit (not less than 4-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) shall be provided: (A)For each motor and fan room. (B)Adjacent to each switchboard on the stage or platform. (C)For each motion picture machine in projection rooms. Exception: One 20-B:C unit (not less than 8-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) in each projection room may be accepted as providing substantially equal protection. (3)The enforcing agency may allow modifications or deviations relative to the number and location of portable fire extinguishers as required by this section provided such authority finds that the basic intent of this section and the ease of accessibility to extinguishers is otherwise achieved. (d)Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 Occupancies. In Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R- 4 occupancies, a continuously attached garden hose, equipped with a water flow control nozzle, may be provided in lieu of one or more required fire extinguishers when acceptable to the enforcing agency. The location and length of such hose shall be as designated or approved by the enforcing agency. NOTE: It is recommended that, wherever possible, portable fire extinguishers be located adjacent to manual fire alarm sending stations. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §565(a)] Selection of Fire Extinguishers. (a)The selection of extinguishers for a given situation shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction in accordance with adopted codes or ordinances. The character of the fires anticipated, the construction and occupancy of the individual property, the vehicle or hazard to be protected, ambient-temperature conditions and other factors shall be considered. The number, size, placement and limitations of use of extinguishers required shall be determined by using California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Sections 567 through 573. Exception: Portable fire extinguishers are not required at normally unmanned Group U occupancy buildings or structures where a portable fire extinguisher suitable to the hazard of the location is provided on the vehicle of visiting personnel. Inspection Documents Violation Documents *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Page 4 of 4 1 From:Robert Barnes <robertb@columbiapacific.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 17, 2024 6:01 PM To:Loew, Michael Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Nelson, Trevor; Andrew Bell; Michelle Maloyan; Patrick Smith; Jonathan Branoff; Chuck Braff Subject:RE: Laurel Creek - TCO Update Attachments:Inspection - Letter_11_22_2024_1748[11].pdf; Laurel Creek - 1st Quarter 2025 Payments (City of SLO).xlsx Hi Michael I wanted to follow up from our separate call on Friday December 6, 2024 and provide additional information and an update on progress towards completing the work the City has identified as a priority. As you are aware the fire inspection was completed on November 21, 2024 – see attached report. The entire team has been working towards addressing all violations raised in the report, including addressing the temporary fire pump. There has been substantial progress in addressing the violations and I understand a pre-walk was completed today on site in preparation for the scheduled re-inspection on Friday December 20, 2024. Attached is a payment plan Columbia Pacific (lender) has approved to pay for the required work to satisfy the inspection violations including the major item of completing work to remove the requirement for a temporary fire pump. A verbal agreement has been reached with the main contractor to complete the work, Kirk Construction. Kirk is owed money for work already completed and has agreed to accept the attached payment plan so that they can be paid in full and complete the work they started. We are formalizing the payment plan in writing with Kirk and will share as soon as we have it – expected by Thursday December 19, 2024. I believe you are meeting with the City Manager tomorrow and believe this update on progress is meaningful and should be taken into consideration during that conversation. There has been a number of conversations around issuing notices to vacate to the existing tenants in the building given the lack of progress at the site and in particular the work related to the temporary fire pump. We now have a clear path moving forward to complete the required work in a timely manner. While the temporary fire pump has been in place for much longer than anticipated, recent inspections have confirmed the temporary fire pump remains functional and is satisfactory to provide the appropriate safety levels for all tenants. Based on the above information and work completed and scheduled to be completed over the next 90 days, a decision to issue notices to vacate to the tenants does not appear reasonable. We would request the City consider this information and allow a short period of time (30-45 days given the holiday period and lead time for Kirk to mobilize) to physically see work being completed by Kirk to implement the permanent pump. We can certainly organize a call with this group (including Kirk Construction) if you would like to discuss further and allow us to expand on the information above or answer any questions. Thanks for your time. Regards Robert Barnes Columbia Pacific Advisors 1910 Fairview Ave. E. | Suite 200 | Seattle, WA 98102 DIRECT (206) 576-0093 (Calls and Messaging) MOBILE (206) 349-5666 (Calls Only) www.columbiapacific.com 2 DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended for use solely by the above- referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this message and then deleting t he copy you received. From: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 3:41 PM To: Chuck Braff <chuck@bowtieholdings.com> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org>; Robert Barnes <robertb@columbiapacific.com>; Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com>; Michelle Maloyan <michelle@parklaneprojects.com>; Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com>; Jonathan Branoff <jonathan@westpacinv.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek - TCO Update Chuck, I am available for a call at 1:30pm tomorrow. I have it blocked out on my calendar. Thanks, Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chuck Braff <chuck@bowtieholdings.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 9:32 AM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org>; robertb@columbiapacific.com; Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com>; Michelle Maloyan <michelle@parklaneprojects.com>; Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com>; Jonathan Branoff <jonathan@westpacinv.com> Subject: Re: Laurel Creek - TCO Update This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. MIchael- We were hoping to have our follow up call today/ tomorrow with you. Are you available for a call today between 2 and 315? If not, does tomorrow (Thursday) work anytime from 130 to 3? Thank you, Chuck Braff You don't often get email from mloew@slocity.org. Learn why this is important 3 On Oct 14, 2024, at 1:57 PM, Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com> wrote: Hi Michael, Thank you for your time last week. As discussed on the call, Park Lane Projects has been engaged on behalf of Columbia Pacific to work with Chuck and WestPac to review and confirm all outstanding costs for the project, as well as the projected costs to complete. This process has been ongoing for the past few weeks and has involved discussions with the subcontractors to come to agreements for their remobilization. The intent for all parties is to get this project moving again as efficiently as possible. As this process is still ongoing, we appreciate you working with us to extend the current TCO date out to November 15 th, 2024. By November 15th, the intent is to have our financial audit completed and have agreements in place with the subcontractors to remobilize. As agreed, our immediate focus will be on the contractors involved with the fire-life safety and fireproofing/AMMR works. We will keep you updated as we move through this process. If you have any questions in the meantime, please let us know. Thanks, Andrew Bell Associate Director Park Lane Projects 9440 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 620 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Cell: 213-264-0219 Email: andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com www.parklaneprojects.com <image001.png> The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, may be protected by the attorney-client or other applicable privileges, or may constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete all copies of it from your computer system. Any use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. Kirk 350,000.00$ Partial payment of previous billing to remobilize Mahogony 11,000.00$ Removing wood/debris inc dumpsters, drywall alterations as requested by fire department. Scheduled to start 12.16 Landscaper 7,500.00$ Cutting/removing trees to satisfy fire report. Scheduled to start 12.17 Alpha 40,975.00$ includes $29k for previous inspection monies owed (awaiting invoices to review and confirm) and $11,975 for temp pump rental 12.20-1.20 Empire 131,079.06$ Commercial Switchgear. We are working with him to confirm pricing. Of this, $14,033.78 is interest/admin charges. Empire 24,704.88$ 44 apts Switchgear. We are working with him to confirm pricing. Of this, $2,786.26 is interest/admin charges. Total 565,258.94$ Kirk 315,205.99$ Partial previously billed amount, plus progress billing. Alpha 11,975.00$ Temp Pump Rental 1.20-2.20 Total 327,180.99$ Kirk 354,600.71$ Partial previously billed amount, plus progress billing. Alpha 56,000.00$ Partial payment for previousluy billed amount required to remobilize for the switch to permanent pump Total 410,600.71$ Kirk 319,695.77$ Partial previously billed amount, plus progress billing. Total 319,695.77$ Friday, January 10, 2025 Friday, February 7, 2025 Friday, March 7, 2025 Friday, April 11, 2025 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783 - 7780 Fax: (805) 543 - 8019 Fire Department Email: FDGeneral@slocity.org Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Business / Occupant:1150 Laurel Address:1150 Laurel Lane Work Phone:310-990-6897 Contact Name:Braff, Chuck Email:chuck@westpacinv.com Thank you for your cooperation with San Luis Obispo City Fire in keeping your business and our community safe! Correct the cited violation(s) by the "Reinspection Date" listed below to avoid further enforcement action including, but not limited to, chargeable re-inspection and/or Administrative Citation. You may request a review of the cited violations by the Department Director [Fire Chief] within 5 days of report issuance if noted violations do not create an immediate danger to health and safety (SLO M.C. 1.24.090). If you have any questions, please contact our Inspection Line at 805/783-7775. Date Completed:11/21/2024 Inspected By:Hutchinson, Julianna Violation Count:11 Inspection Notes: Violations Code Description Comments Reinspection Date 315.4 Outside storage. Outside storage of combustible materials shall not be located within 10 feet (3048 mm) of a lot line. Exceptions: 1.The separation distance is allowed to be reduced to 3 feet (914 mm) for storage not exceeding 6 feet (1829 mm) in height. 2.The separation distance is allowed to be reduced where the fire code official determines that hazard to the adjoining property does not exist. Secure exterior combustibles/wood storage on site from public access and maintain stacks in accordance with section 315.4 of the 2022 California Fire Code. 12/20/2024 304.1 .2 Vegetation. Weeds, grass, vines or other growth that is capable of being ignited and endangering property, shall be cut down and removed by the owner or occupant of the premises. Vegetation clearance requirements in wildland-urban interface areas shall be in accordance with Chapter 49. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.07(b)] Clearances. Remove dead trees around the property and prune back dead brush/limbs. 12/20/2024 San Luis Obispo City Fire Inspection Report Fire Department Information Business / Occupant Information Inspection Information Page 1 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. (b)Ground Clearance. The space surrounding every building or structure shall be maintained in accordance with the following: Any person that owns, leases, controls, operates or maintains any building or structure in, upon or adjoining any mountainous area or forest-covered lands, brush covered lands or grass-covered lands, or any land which is covered with flammable material, shall at all times do all of the following: (1)Maintain around and adjacent to such building or structure a firebreak made by removing and clearing away, for a distance of not less than 30 feet on each side thereof or to the property line, whichever is nearer, all flammable vegetation or other combustible growth. This section does not apply to single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery or similar plants which are used as ground cover, if they do not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from the native growth to any building or structure. (2)Maintain around and adjacent to any such building or structure additional fire protection or firebreak made by removing all bush, flammable vegetation or combustible growth which is located from 30 feet to 100 feet from such building or structure or to the property line, whichever is nearer, as may be required by the enforcing agency if he finds that, because of extra hazardous conditions, a firebreak of only 30 feet around such building or structure is not sufficient to provide reasonable fire safety. Grass and other vegetation located more than 30 feet from such building or structure and less than 18 inches in height above the ground may be maintained where necessary to stabilize the soil and prevent erosion. (3)Remove that portion of any tree which extends within 10 feet of the outlet of any chimney or stovepipe. (4)Cut and remove all dead or dying portions of trees located adjacent to or overhanging any building. (5)Maintain the roof of any structure free of leaves, needles or other dead vegetative growth. (6)Provide and maintain at all times a screen over the outlet of every chimney or stovepipe that is attached to any fireplace, stove or other device that burns any solid or liquid fuel. The screen shall be constructed of nonflammable material with openings of not more than 1/2 inch in size. (7) Vegetation around all applicable buildings and structures shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations: (A)Public Resources Code Section 4291. (B)California Code of Regulations Title 14 - Natural Resources, Division 1.5 - Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, “General Guideline to Create Defensible Space.” Page 2 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. (C)California Government Code Section 51182. (D)California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 9. 315.3 Storage in buildings. Storage of materials in buildings shall be orderly and stacks shall be stable. Storage of combustible materials shall be separated from heaters or heating devices by distance or shielding so that ignition cannot occur. Storage space for electrician company, Cal fire, etc. shall have clear exit paths through the storage and to the outside. Space is considered unsafe with unpermitted high piled storage and unclear pathways. 12/20/2024 507.5 .3 Private fire service mains and water tanks. Private fire service mains and water tanks shall be periodically inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. 1.Private fire hydrants of all types: Inspection annually and after each operation; flow test and maintenance annually. 2.Fire service main piping: Inspection of exposed, annually; flow test every 5 years. 3.Fire service main piping strainers: Inspection and maintenance after each use. Records of inspections, testing and maintenance shall be maintained. The temporary fire pump has greatly exceeded the allowable number of days it was permitted for operation in lieu of a permanent fire pump. The sites underground fire line and permanent pump are required to be installed. 12/20/2024 507.5 .5 Clear space around hydrants. A 3-foot (914 mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants, except as otherwise required or approved. Unblock fire hydrant at back of property and provide clear 26’ wide space in front of all onsite fire hydrants. 12/20/2024 603.2 .2 Open electrical terminations. Open junction boxes and open-wiring splices shall be prohibited. Approved covers shall be provided for all switch and electrical outlet boxes. Cover exposed electrical wiring in occupied spaces and remove or safely secure wire tripping hazard in event space. 12/20/2024 603.6 Extension cords. Extension cords shall not be a substitute for permanent wiring and shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 817. Extension cords shall not be affixed to structures, extended through walls, ceilings or floors, or under doors or floor coverings, nor shall such cords be subject to environmental damage or physical impact. Extension cords shall be used only with portable appliances. Extension cords marked for indoor use shall not be used outdoors. Cover exposed electrical wiring in occupied spaces and remove or safely secure wire tripping hazard in event space. 12/20/2024 311.2 .3 Fire separation. Fire-resistance-rated partitions, fire barriers and fire walls separating vacant tenant spaces from the remainder of the building shall be maintained. Openings, joints and penetrations in fire-resistance-rated assemblies shall be protected in accordance with Chapter 7. Unfinished fire rated exit halls and construction exposed to open wood. 12/20/2024 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire protection and life safety systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection and life safety systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed in accordance with Section 901.8. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other Provide annual fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire hydrant, and fire pump test reports. Fire sprinklers are considered deficient due to an incomplete system with unprotected, unsprinkered areas. 12/20/2024 Page 3 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. equipment, material or systems required by these regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with this code and California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment, material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1.14] Maintenance. Every fire alarm system or device, sprinkler system, fire extinguisher, fire hose, fire-resistive assembly or any other fire safety assembly, device, material or equipment installed and retained in service in any building or structure subject to California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations and with their intended use. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.24] Maintenance of Equipment. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (a) All automatic fire extinguishing systems, including systems installed as an alternate to other building requirements, shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the following frequencies. Local authorities may require more frequent inspection, testing and maintenance and additional procedures. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)(1)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (1) Water-based fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the frequencies required by NFPA 25 (2011 edition) including Annexes A, B, C, D, E, F and G as amended by the State of California. (Published as NFPA 25, 2013 California Edition.) [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(b)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (b) When proof of the installation date of standpipe systems or automatic fire sprinkler systems cannot be furnished, such systems shall receive initial testing and maintenance by July 1, 1985. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Page 4 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Division 1, §904.2(a)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (a) All testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems in accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 13195 shall be performed by those licensed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13196.5. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, licensing of fire departments which conduct fire sprinkler and standpipe system testing and maintenance. (2) Service on fire alarm systems and industrial systems as specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 13196.5(b) and (c) may be conducted without a license. (3) Testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems exempted in writing by the State Fire Marshal, when the building owner or occupant has the staff and equipment to conduct testing and maintenance. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(b)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (b) Any testing and maintenance of automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be performed in accordance with these requirements. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, the requirement that testing and maintenance be performed in accordance with these requirements when a licensee can demonstrate that a system cannot functionally be tested and maintained in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. (2) If at any time a licensee encounters a specialized or modified system which cannot be tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5, the licensee shall contact the State Fire Marshal and test and maintain the system as directed. (A) The intent of this section is to cover automatic fire extinguishing systems as originally designed, installed and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. It is not, however, intended to require that such systems be upgraded to current adopted standards. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(h)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (h) At the time of testing and maintenance, building management shall be consulted to avoid unnecessary disturbance of normal building operation. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(i)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (i) The licensee shall contact the local fire authority having jurisdiction prior to testing and maintenance of a system when required by the local fire authority having jurisdiction to do so. 906.1 Where required.All fire extinguishers in the building and units 12/20/2024 Page 5 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all of the following locations: 1.In new and existing Group A, B, E, F, H, I, L, M, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R-3.1, R-4 and S occupancies. Exception: In Group R-2 occupancies, portable fire extinguishers shall be required only in locations specified in Items 2 through 6 where each dwelling unit is provided with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 1- A:10-B:C. 2.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) distance of travel from commercial cooking equipment and from domestic cooking equipment in Group R-2 college dormitory occupancies. 3.In areas where flammable or combustible liquids are stored, used or dispensed. 4.On each floor of structures under construction, except Group R-3 occupancies, in accordance with Section 3316.1. 5.Where required by the sections indicated in Table 906.1. 6.Special-hazard areas, including but not limited to laboratories, computer rooms and generator rooms, where required by the fire code official. 7.Large and small family day-care homes shall be equipped with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating. 8.Where required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. 9.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) of domestic cooking equipment located in a Group I-2. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.29(a) through (d)] Portable Fire Extinguishing Equipment. (a)General. Portable fire extinguishers conforming to the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 3, shall be installed and maintained in accordance with guides established therein. (b)Special Coverage. Additional Class A, B and C units of adequate extinguishing potential shall be provided for any other hazard, as determined by the enforcing agency. (c)Group A Occupancies. (1)One additional Class 2-A unit shall be provided in Group A Occupancies as follows: (A)On each side of the stage or platform. Exception: Platforms 1000 square feet or less in area need have only one such extinguishing unit. (B)On each side of every fly gallery. (C)In basements beneath the stage or platform. (D)In every hallway or passageway leading to a dressing room. (E)In every property room, carpenter shop or similar workroom. (2)Not less than one 10-B:C unit (not less than 4-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) shall be provided: (A)For each motor and fan room. (B)Adjacent to each switchboard on the stage or platform. (C)For each motion picture machine in are due for their annual service and need updated tags. Page 6 of 7 projection rooms. Exception: One 20-B:C unit (not less than 8-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) in each projection room may be accepted as providing substantially equal protection. (3)The enforcing agency may allow modifications or deviations relative to the number and location of portable fire extinguishers as required by this section provided such authority finds that the basic intent of this section and the ease of accessibility to extinguishers is otherwise achieved. (d)Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 Occupancies. In Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 occupancies, a continuously attached garden hose, equipped with a water flow control nozzle, may be provided in lieu of one or more required fire extinguishers when acceptable to the enforcing agency. The location and length of such hose shall be as designated or approved by the enforcing agency. NOTE: It is recommended that, wherever possible, portable fire extinguishers be located adjacent to manual fire alarm sending stations. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §565(a)] Selection of Fire Extinguishers. (a)The selection of extinguishers for a given situation shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction in accordance with adopted codes or ordinances. The character of the fires anticipated, the construction and occupancy of the individual property, the vehicle or hazard to be protected, ambient-temperature conditions and other factors shall be considered. The number, size, placement and limitations of use of extinguishers required shall be determined by using California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Sections 567 through 573. Exception: Portable fire extinguishers are not required at normally unmanned Group U occupancy buildings or structures where a portable fire extinguisher suitable to the hazard of the location is provided on the vehicle of visiting personnel. 4804. 7 Exit obstructions. All means of egress shall be maintained in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10, Section 1005.1. Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and have any chemicals and hazardous materials stored in proper flame cabinets or in other approved areas. No propane storage inside. 12/20/2024 Inspection Documents Violation Documents *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Page 7 of 7 1 From:Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 18, 2024 10:00 AM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:Fwd: Laurel Creek - TCO Update Attachments:Laurel - Fire Deficiency Tracking Sheet.pdf; Inspection - Letter_11_22_2024_1748[11].pdf; Laurel Creek - 1st Quarter 2025 Payments (City of SLO).xlsx Julianna - Please see email below. Also, per our walk please see updated check list I am using here on site. I have also attached a few photos - cover plates installed. - Working on moving spider box cord out of corridor. - exit corridors do not have items stored in them. - AMMR corridor needs frames, doors and hardware. - work taking place on stairs and 2nd floor to complete fire rated assembly - lumber pile has been moved 10’ away from fence. - storage in warehouse is now below 12’ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Chuck Braff Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 Begin forwarded message: From: Robert Barnes <robertb@columbiapacific.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek - TCO Update Date: December 17, 2024 at 6:01:13 PM PST To: "Loew, Michael" <Mloew@slocity.org> Cc: "Tway, Timothea (Timmi)" <TTway@slocity.org>, "Nelson, Trevor" <tnelson@slocity.org>, Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com>, Michelle Maloyan 13 <michelle@parklaneprojects.com>, Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com>, Jonathan Branoff <jonathan@westpacinv.com>, Chuck Braff <chuck@bowtieholdings.com> Hi Michael I wanted to follow up from our separate call on Friday December 6, 2024 and provide additional information and an update on progress towards completing the work the City has identified as a priority. As you are aware the fire inspection was completed on November 21, 2024 – see attached report. The entire team has been working towards addressing all violations raised in the report, including addressing the temporary fire pump. There has been substantial progress in addressing the violations and I understand a pre-walk was completed today on site in preparation for the scheduled re-inspection on Friday December 20, 2024. Attached is a payment plan Columbia Pacific (lender) has approved to pay for the required work to satisfy the inspection violations including the major item of completing work to remove the requirement for a temporary fire pump. A verbal agreement has been reached with the main contractor to complete the work, Kirk Construction. Kirk is owed money for work already completed and has agreed to accept the attached payment plan so that they can be paid in full and complete the work they started. We are formalizing the payment plan in writing with Kirk and will share as soon as we have it – expected by Thursday December 19, 2024. I believe you are meeting with the City Manager tomorrow and believe this update on progress is meaningful and should be taken into consideration during that conversation. There has been a number of conversations around issuing notices to vacate to the existing tenants in the building given the lack of progress at the site and in particular the work related to the temporary fire pump. We now have a clear path moving forward to complete the required work in a timely manner. While the temporary fire pump has been in place for much longer than anticipated, recent inspections have confirmed the temporary fire pump remains functional and is satisfactory to provide the appropriate safety levels for all tenants. Based on the above information and work completed and scheduled to be completed over the next 90 days, a decision to issue notices to vacate to the tenants does not appear reasonable. We would request the City consider this information and allow a short period of time (30-45 days given the holiday period and lead time for Kirk to mobilize) to physically see work being completed by Kirk to implement the permanent pump. We can certainly organize a call with this group (including Kirk Construction) if you would like to discuss further and allow us to expand on the information above or answer any questions. Thanks for your time. Regards Robert Barnes Columbia Pacific Advisors 1910 Fairview Ave. E. | Suite 200 | Seattle, WA 98102 DIRECT (206) 576-0093 (Calls and Messaging) MOBILE (206) 349-5666 (Calls Only) www.columbiapacific.com DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended for use solely by the above referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this message and then deleting the copy you received. 14 From: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 3:41 PM To: Chuck Braff <chuck@bowtieholdings.com> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org>; Robert Barnes <robertb@columbiapacific.com>; Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com>; Michelle Maloyan <michelle@parklaneprojects.com>; Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com>; Jonathan Branoff <jonathan@westpacinv.com> Subject: RE: Laurel Creek - TCO Update Chuck, I am available for a call at 1:30pm tomorrow. I have it blocked out on my calendar. Thanks, Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chuck Braff <chuck@bowtieholdings.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 9:32 AM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org>; robertb@columbiapacific.com; Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com>; Michelle Maloyan <michelle@parklaneprojects.com>; Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com>; Jonathan Branoff <jonathan@westpacinv.com> Subject: Re: Laurel Creek - TCO Update This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. MIchael- We were hoping to have our follow up call today/ tomorrow with you. Are you available for a call today between 2 and 315? If not, does tomorrow (Thursday) work anytime from 130 to 3? You don't often get email from mloew@slocity.org. Learn why this is important 15 Thank you, Chuck Braff On Oct 14, 2024, at 1:57 PM, Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com> wrote: Hi Michael, Thank you for your time last week. As discussed on the call, Park Lane Projects has been engaged on behalf of Columbia Pacific to work with Chuck and WestPac to review and confirm all outstanding costs for the project, as well as the projected costs to complete. This process has been ongoing for the past few weeks and has involved discussions with the subcontractors to come to agreements for their remobilization. The intent for all parties is to get this project moving again as efficiently as possible. As this process is still ongoing, we appreciate you working with us to extend the current TCO date out to November 15th, 2024. By November 15th, the intent is to have our financial audit completed and have agreements in place with the subcontractors to remobilize. As agreed, our immediate focus will be on the contractors involved with the fire-life safety and fireproofing/AMMR works. We will keep you updated as we move through this process. If you have any questions in the meantime, please let us know. Thanks, Andrew Bell Associate Director Park Lane Projects 9440 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 620 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Cell: 213-264-0219 Email: andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com www.parklaneprojects.com <image001.png> The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, may be protected by the attorney-client or other applicable privileges, or may constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete all copies of it from your computer system. Any use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. Kirk 350,000.00$ Partial payment of previous billing to remobilize Mahogony 11,000.00$ Removing wood/debris inc dumpsters, drywall alterations as requested by fire department. Scheduled to start 12.16 Landscaper 7,500.00$ Cutting/removing trees to satisfy fire report. Scheduled to start 12.17 Alpha 40,975.00$ includes $29k for previous inspection monies owed (awaiting invoices to review and confirm) and $11,975 for temp pump rental 12.20-1.20 Empire 131,079.06$ Commercial Switchgear. We are working with him to confirm pricing. Of this, $14,033.78 is interest/admin charges. Empire 24,704.88$ 44 apts Switchgear. We are working with him to confirm pricing. Of this, $2,786.26 is interest/admin charges. Total 565,258.94$ Kirk 315,205.99$ Partial previously billed amount, plus progress billing. Alpha 11,975.00$ Temp Pump Rental 1.20-2.20 Total 327,180.99$ Kirk 354,600.71$ Partial previously billed amount, plus progress billing. Alpha 56,000.00$ Partial payment for previousluy billed amount required to remobilize for the switch to permanent pump Total 410,600.71$ Kirk 319,695.77$ Partial previously billed amount, plus progress billing. Total 319,695.77$ Friday, January 10, 2025 Friday, February 7, 2025 Friday, March 7, 2025 Friday, April 11, 2025 Laurel Fire Department Deficiency Tracking Sheet #ITEM STATUS 1 Secure combustibles/ wood storage on site from public access Move existing lumber 10' from property line and 26' away from fire hydrant. May require more fencing, chain and lock. Work starts Monday December 16th 2 Fire Hydrant - Lumber to be moved to provide access to fire hydrant at back of property See above. Work starts Monday December 16th 3 Remove Dead Trees from property Work started Tuesday December 17th. 4 Empire and CalFire warehouse to be piled only to 12' MAX w/ clear exit pathway COMPLETE 5 Temp pump is overdue. Complete underground system Agreement has been made. Work to start second week of Jan. Working on final agreement. 6 Cover all exposed electrical wiring in occupied spaces. Temp cord removed COMPLETE 7 Unfinished fire rated exit hall has exposed wood members (East Corridor)Complete assembly. Walking with sub Wednesday AM. Chuck will call Julianna and Trevor and propose fix. Then complete. Work starts Monday December 16th 8 Annual Fire Extinguisher Servicing COMPLETE 9 Annual Fire alarm, sprinkler, hydrant and fire pump report Alpha has run all tests. Report is complete and they are to upload to portal. 10 Combustible Hangings to be removed Interior to Bang the Drum - Spoke with Julianna. Docs provided are not sufficient. Need approved certified docs from Bang the Drum. Might have tag on curtains. 11 Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and any other hazardous items COMPLETE Additional 1 Chain and lock fire risers COMPLETE Additional 2 Ceiling tile missing in event space's dedicated exit corridor (nearest Ernest COMPLETE Additional 3 Small fire riser behind Bang the Drum needs chain and lock Chain and lock to be installed 12/18 Additional 4 Exit door at Ernest (nearest Laurel). Confirm opens Checking with Ernest 12/18 Additional 5 ADA egress at Laurel. Requires debris to be removed.Removing debris 12/19 Additional 6 Lighting trim to be installed in common areas (south Lobby).Electrician has been notified Additional 7 Close all upstairs corridor doors COMPLETE Additional 8 AMMR Corridor to have doors installed.Chuck is digging into suppliers. *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783 - 7780 Fax: (805) 543 - 8019 Fire Department Email: FDGeneral@slocity.org Hours: Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Business / Occupant:1150 Laurel Address:1150 Laurel Lane Work Phone:310-990-6897 Contact Name:Braff, Chuck Email:chuck@westpacinv.com Thank you for your cooperation with San Luis Obispo City Fire in keeping your business and our community safe! Correct the cited violation(s) by the "Reinspection Date" listed below to avoid further enforcement action including, but not limited to, chargeable re-inspection and/or Administrative Citation. You may request a review of the cited violations by the Department Director [Fire Chief] within 5 days of report issuance if noted violations do not create an immediate danger to health and safety (SLO M.C. 1.24.090). If you have any questions, please contact our Inspection Line at 805/783-7775. Date Completed:11/21/2024 Inspected By:Hutchinson, Julianna Violation Count:11 Inspection Notes: Violations Code Description Comments Reinspection Date 315.4 Outside storage. Outside storage of combustible materials shall not be located within 10 feet (3048 mm) of a lot line. Exceptions: 1.The separation distance is allowed to be reduced to 3 feet (914 mm) for storage not exceeding 6 feet (1829 mm) in height. 2.The separation distance is allowed to be reduced where the fire code official determines that hazard to the adjoining property does not exist. Secure exterior combustibles/wood storage on site from public access and maintain stacks in accordance with section 315.4 of the 2022 California Fire Code. 12/20/2024 304.1 .2 Vegetation. Weeds, grass, vines or other growth that is capable of being ignited and endangering property, shall be cut down and removed by the owner or occupant of the premises. Vegetation clearance requirements in wildland-urban interface areas shall be in accordance with Chapter 49. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.07(b)] Clearances. Remove dead trees around the property and prune back dead brush/limbs. 12/20/2024 San Luis Obispo City Fire Inspection Report Fire Department Information Business / Occupant Information Inspection Information Page 1 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. (b)Ground Clearance. The space surrounding every building or structure shall be maintained in accordance with the following: Any person that owns, leases, controls, operates or maintains any building or structure in, upon or adjoining any mountainous area or forest-covered lands, brush covered lands or grass-covered lands, or any land which is covered with flammable material, shall at all times do all of the following: (1)Maintain around and adjacent to such building or structure a firebreak made by removing and clearing away, for a distance of not less than 30 feet on each side thereof or to the property line, whichever is nearer, all flammable vegetation or other combustible growth. This section does not apply to single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery or similar plants which are used as ground cover, if they do not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from the native growth to any building or structure. (2)Maintain around and adjacent to any such building or structure additional fire protection or firebreak made by removing all bush, flammable vegetation or combustible growth which is located from 30 feet to 100 feet from such building or structure or to the property line, whichever is nearer, as may be required by the enforcing agency if he finds that, because of extra hazardous conditions, a firebreak of only 30 feet around such building or structure is not sufficient to provide reasonable fire safety. Grass and other vegetation located more than 30 feet from such building or structure and less than 18 inches in height above the ground may be maintained where necessary to stabilize the soil and prevent erosion. (3)Remove that portion of any tree which extends within 10 feet of the outlet of any chimney or stovepipe. (4)Cut and remove all dead or dying portions of trees located adjacent to or overhanging any building. (5)Maintain the roof of any structure free of leaves, needles or other dead vegetative growth. (6)Provide and maintain at all times a screen over the outlet of every chimney or stovepipe that is attached to any fireplace, stove or other device that burns any solid or liquid fuel. The screen shall be constructed of nonflammable material with openings of not more than 1/2 inch in size. (7) Vegetation around all applicable buildings and structures shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations: (A)Public Resources Code Section 4291. (B)California Code of Regulations Title 14 - Natural Resources, Division 1.5 - Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, “General Guideline to Create Defensible Space.” Page 2 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. (C)California Government Code Section 51182. (D)California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 9. 315.3 Storage in buildings. Storage of materials in buildings shall be orderly and stacks shall be stable. Storage of combustible materials shall be separated from heaters or heating devices by distance or shielding so that ignition cannot occur. Storage space for electrician company, Cal fire, etc. shall have clear exit paths through the storage and to the outside. Space is considered unsafe with unpermitted high piled storage and unclear pathways. 12/20/2024 507.5 .3 Private fire service mains and water tanks. Private fire service mains and water tanks shall be periodically inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. 1.Private fire hydrants of all types: Inspection annually and after each operation; flow test and maintenance annually. 2.Fire service main piping: Inspection of exposed, annually; flow test every 5 years. 3.Fire service main piping strainers: Inspection and maintenance after each use. Records of inspections, testing and maintenance shall be maintained. The temporary fire pump has greatly exceeded the allowable number of days it was permitted for operation in lieu of a permanent fire pump. The sites underground fire line and permanent pump are required to be installed. 12/20/2024 507.5 .5 Clear space around hydrants. A 3-foot (914 mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants, except as otherwise required or approved. Unblock fire hydrant at back of property and provide clear 26’ wide space in front of all onsite fire hydrants. 12/20/2024 603.2 .2 Open electrical terminations. Open junction boxes and open-wiring splices shall be prohibited. Approved covers shall be provided for all switch and electrical outlet boxes. Cover exposed electrical wiring in occupied spaces and remove or safely secure wire tripping hazard in event space. 12/20/2024 603.6 Extension cords. Extension cords shall not be a substitute for permanent wiring and shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 817. Extension cords shall not be affixed to structures, extended through walls, ceilings or floors, or under doors or floor coverings, nor shall such cords be subject to environmental damage or physical impact. Extension cords shall be used only with portable appliances. Extension cords marked for indoor use shall not be used outdoors. Cover exposed electrical wiring in occupied spaces and remove or safely secure wire tripping hazard in event space. 12/20/2024 311.2 .3 Fire separation. Fire-resistance-rated partitions, fire barriers and fire walls separating vacant tenant spaces from the remainder of the building shall be maintained. Openings, joints and penetrations in fire-resistance-rated assemblies shall be protected in accordance with Chapter 7. Unfinished fire rated exit halls and construction exposed to open wood. 12/20/2024 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire protection and life safety systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection and life safety systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed in accordance with Section 901.8. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other Provide annual fire alarm, fire sprinkler, fire hydrant, and fire pump test reports. Fire sprinklers are considered deficient due to an incomplete system with unprotected, unsprinkered areas. 12/20/2024 Page 3 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. equipment, material or systems required by these regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with this code and California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment, material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §1.14] Maintenance. Every fire alarm system or device, sprinkler system, fire extinguisher, fire hose, fire-resistive assembly or any other fire safety assembly, device, material or equipment installed and retained in service in any building or structure subject to California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 regulations and with their intended use. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.24] Maintenance of Equipment. All fire alarm systems, fire detection systems, automatic sprinkler or extinguishing systems, communication systems, and all other equipment, material or systems required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Upon disruption or diminishment of the fire protective qualities of such equipment, material or systems, immediate action shall be instituted to affect a reestablishment of such equipment material or systems to their original normal and operational condition. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (a) All automatic fire extinguishing systems, including systems installed as an alternate to other building requirements, shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the following frequencies. Local authorities may require more frequent inspection, testing and maintenance and additional procedures. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(a)(1)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (1) Water-based fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the frequencies required by NFPA 25 (2011 edition) including Annexes A, B, C, D, E, F and G as amended by the State of California. (Published as NFPA 25, 2013 California Edition.) [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904(b)] Required Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Frequencies. (b) When proof of the installation date of standpipe systems or automatic fire sprinkler systems cannot be furnished, such systems shall receive initial testing and maintenance by July 1, 1985. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Page 4 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Division 1, §904.2(a)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (a) All testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems in accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 13195 shall be performed by those licensed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13196.5. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, licensing of fire departments which conduct fire sprinkler and standpipe system testing and maintenance. (2) Service on fire alarm systems and industrial systems as specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 13196.5(b) and (c) may be conducted without a license. (3) Testing and maintenance on automatic fire extinguishing systems exempted in writing by the State Fire Marshal, when the building owner or occupant has the staff and equipment to conduct testing and maintenance. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(b)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (b) Any testing and maintenance of automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be performed in accordance with these requirements. Exceptions: (1) The State Fire Marshal may waive, in writing, the requirement that testing and maintenance be performed in accordance with these requirements when a licensee can demonstrate that a system cannot functionally be tested and maintained in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5. (2) If at any time a licensee encounters a specialized or modified system which cannot be tested and maintained in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 5, the licensee shall contact the State Fire Marshal and test and maintain the system as directed. (A) The intent of this section is to cover automatic fire extinguishing systems as originally designed, installed and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. It is not, however, intended to require that such systems be upgraded to current adopted standards. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(h)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (h) At the time of testing and maintenance, building management shall be consulted to avoid unnecessary disturbance of normal building operation. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §904.2(i)] Testing and Maintenance Requirements. (i) The licensee shall contact the local fire authority having jurisdiction prior to testing and maintenance of a system when required by the local fire authority having jurisdiction to do so. 906.1 Where required.All fire extinguishers in the building and units 12/20/2024 Page 5 of 7 *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed in all of the following locations: 1.In new and existing Group A, B, E, F, H, I, L, M, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R-3.1, R-4 and S occupancies. Exception: In Group R-2 occupancies, portable fire extinguishers shall be required only in locations specified in Items 2 through 6 where each dwelling unit is provided with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 1- A:10-B:C. 2.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) distance of travel from commercial cooking equipment and from domestic cooking equipment in Group R-2 college dormitory occupancies. 3.In areas where flammable or combustible liquids are stored, used or dispensed. 4.On each floor of structures under construction, except Group R-3 occupancies, in accordance with Section 3316.1. 5.Where required by the sections indicated in Table 906.1. 6.Special-hazard areas, including but not limited to laboratories, computer rooms and generator rooms, where required by the fire code official. 7.Large and small family day-care homes shall be equipped with a portable fire extinguisher having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating. 8.Where required by California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1. 9.Within 30 feet (9144 mm) of domestic cooking equipment located in a Group I-2. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §3.29(a) through (d)] Portable Fire Extinguishing Equipment. (a)General. Portable fire extinguishers conforming to the requirements of California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 3, shall be installed and maintained in accordance with guides established therein. (b)Special Coverage. Additional Class A, B and C units of adequate extinguishing potential shall be provided for any other hazard, as determined by the enforcing agency. (c)Group A Occupancies. (1)One additional Class 2-A unit shall be provided in Group A Occupancies as follows: (A)On each side of the stage or platform. Exception: Platforms 1000 square feet or less in area need have only one such extinguishing unit. (B)On each side of every fly gallery. (C)In basements beneath the stage or platform. (D)In every hallway or passageway leading to a dressing room. (E)In every property room, carpenter shop or similar workroom. (2)Not less than one 10-B:C unit (not less than 4-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) shall be provided: (A)For each motor and fan room. (B)Adjacent to each switchboard on the stage or platform. (C)For each motion picture machine in are due for their annual service and need updated tags. Page 6 of 7 projection rooms. Exception: One 20-B:C unit (not less than 8-B:C for existing extinguishers in existing occupancies) in each projection room may be accepted as providing substantially equal protection. (3)The enforcing agency may allow modifications or deviations relative to the number and location of portable fire extinguishers as required by this section provided such authority finds that the basic intent of this section and the ease of accessibility to extinguishers is otherwise achieved. (d)Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 Occupancies. In Group R-2.1, R-3.1 and R-4 occupancies, a continuously attached garden hose, equipped with a water flow control nozzle, may be provided in lieu of one or more required fire extinguishers when acceptable to the enforcing agency. The location and length of such hose shall be as designated or approved by the enforcing agency. NOTE: It is recommended that, wherever possible, portable fire extinguishers be located adjacent to manual fire alarm sending stations. [California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, §565(a)] Selection of Fire Extinguishers. (a)The selection of extinguishers for a given situation shall be determined by the authority having jurisdiction in accordance with adopted codes or ordinances. The character of the fires anticipated, the construction and occupancy of the individual property, the vehicle or hazard to be protected, ambient-temperature conditions and other factors shall be considered. The number, size, placement and limitations of use of extinguishers required shall be determined by using California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Sections 567 through 573. Exception: Portable fire extinguishers are not required at normally unmanned Group U occupancy buildings or structures where a portable fire extinguisher suitable to the hazard of the location is provided on the vehicle of visiting personnel. 4804. 7 Exit obstructions. All means of egress shall be maintained in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10, Section 1005.1. Remove all storage in rated exit hallways and have any chemicals and hazardous materials stored in proper flame cabinets or in other approved areas. No propane storage inside. 12/20/2024 Inspection Documents Violation Documents *Please note: If a third inspection is required due to non-compliance, a fire-inspection fee of $201.87 may be charged for that inspection, and every inspection thereafter until compliance is obtained. Failure to comply may result in a misdemeanor citation and an appearance by you in court. Page 7 of 7 1 From:Nichols, Vanessa Sent:Monday, January 13, 2025 9:29 AM To:Chuck Braff Cc:Nelson, Trevor Subject:RE: Laurel - Permit Invoices Attachments:Re-Issuance Invoice - GRAD-0827-2020.pdf; Re-Issuance Invoice - BLDG-2361-2020.pdf; Re- Issuance Invoice - BLDG-2051-2020.pdf; Re-Issuance Invoice - BLDG-0813-2021.pdf Good Morning Chuck, Attached you will find the invoices for the re-issued permits. The invoices can be paid online by following this link https://infoslo.slocity.org/EnerGov_Prod/selfservice#/home and clicking on Pay Invoices on the top menu bar. Or you can bring a check into the office during open office hours for payments to be processed. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding getting the invoices paid or if you need any assistance. Have a good day! Vanessa Nichols Building Permit Services Supervisor Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E vnichols@slocity.org T 805.781.7588 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 9:25 AM To: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Cc: Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org> Subject: Laurel - Permit Invoices This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. I understand that you are working on the invoices for the Laurel Permits Trevor and I are going to be working on. Please do share them when you are able to complete them. I’ll work to get them paid quickly. If you need anything from me please let me know. Thank you. Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 INVOICE (00038071) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT Patrick Smith Laurel Creek LLC 1150 Laurel Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00038071 01/13/2025 02/12/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL GRAD-0827-2020 Permit Reissuance Fee-BLDG $171.00 Supplemental Inspection (Building) - BLDG $518.00 $689.00 SUBTOTAL1150 Laurel Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 TOTAL $689.00 Page 1 of 1January 13, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo INVOICE (00038042) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT INACTIVE LAUREL CREEK LP 505 BATH St SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00038042 01/09/2025 02/08/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL BLDG-2361-2020 Permit Reissuance Fee-BLDG $171.00 Supplemental Inspection (Building) - BLDG $1,295.00 $1,466.00 SUBTOTAL1150 Laurel Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 TOTAL $1,466.00 Page 1 of 1January 09, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo INVOICE (00038040) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT Heather Wiebe Arris Studio Architects 1327 Archer St 220 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 INACTIVE Laurel Creek, LLC 1150 LAUREL Ln INACTIVE ATOLL BUSINESS CENTER LLC A CA LLC 1150 LAUREL Ln SLO, CA 93401 Laurel Creek LP 505 Bath St Santa Barbara, CA 93101 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00038040 01/09/2025 02/08/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL BLDG-2051-2020 Permit Reissuance Fee-BLDG $171.00 Supplemental Inspection (Building) - BLDG $1,295.00 $1,466.00 SUBTOTAL1150 Laurel Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 TOTAL $1,466.00 Page 1 of 1January 09, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo INVOICE (00038038) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT Chuck Braff BOW TIE HOLDINGS 1880 SANTA BARBARA Ave 110 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 INACTIVE LAUREL CREEK LP 505 BATH St SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00038038 01/09/2025 02/08/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL BLDG-0813-2021 Permit Reissuance Fee-BLDG $171.00 Supplemental Inspection (Building) - BLDG $3,885.00 $4,056.00 SUBTOTAL1150 Laurel Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 TOTAL $4,056.00 Page 1 of 1January 09, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo 1 From:Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com> Sent:Thursday, February 6, 2025 8:30 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); robertb@columbiapacific.com; Michelle Maloyan; Patrick Smith; Jonathan Branoff; Chuck Braff Subject:Re: Status update on 1150 Laurel This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Timothea, The permit reissuance fees, and supplemental inspection fees were paid on January 22nd. Kirk has mobilized equipment and materials and started work on the fire line and PG&E. We have been focused on safing off the site work and tightening up the swppps. However, the rain this week meant that no work was conducted today, and likely tomorrow. Our other focus has been re-engaging consultants and contractors involved in the fire line- survey, civil, and Alpha. Chuck met with Trevor on the AMMR (building) permits/ scope this week. While the focus has been on the fire line, we will be transitioning to the internal items next week. The plan is to have another walk with Trevor in two weeks and trades kicked off / mobilizing shortly thereafter. This work includes review of fireproofing, 3-hour walls- drywall and doors etc, as well as all egress paths. Please let us know if you have any questions or require any additional information at this time. Andrew Bell Associate Director Park Lane Projects 9440 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 620 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Cell: 213-264-0219 Email: andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com www.parklaneprojects.com The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, may be protected by the attorney-client or other applicable privileges, or may constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete all copies of it from your computer system. Any use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 at 9:55 AM To: robertb@columbiapacific.com <robertb@columbiapacific.com>, Andrew Bell <andrewbell@parklaneprojects.com>, Michelle Maloyan <michelle@parklaneprojects.com>, Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com>, Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com>, Chuck Braff <chuck@bowtieholdings.com> Subject: Status update on 1150 Laurel 2 Hello All, Mike Loew is out of the office, so I apologize if you have provided him with this information recently, but can you please provide the most up-to-date status as to where the Laurel project is with addressing the deficiencies identified by the City and pulling the permits/completing the work included in the permits to bring the building into compliance. Thank you, Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:Iris Kristin Deza <iriskristin.deza@RealPage.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 4, 2025 9:47 AM To:Oetzell, Walter Subject:RE: Project Inquiry Good afternoon Mr. Walter, Thank you for taking the time to examine the permits and information related to this project. I appreciate your thorough revi ew. I hope you have a pleasant rest of your day. Best, Iris Kristin Deza Research Analyst | Data Analytics 2201 Lakeside Blvd | Richardson, TX 75082 www.realpage.com iriskristin.deza@RealPage.com Office: 972-820-3991 From: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 7:07 PM To: Iris Kristin Deza <iriskristin.deza@RealPage.com> Subject: RE: Project Inquiry CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Iris, I reviewed the permit history for this property and did not find indication of an active, issued permit for construction of 100 units. A project described as “Addition of two levels of mulit-family residential around the perimeter of an existing warehouse and conversion of existing second level offices to apartments, exception requested to maximum sign height” was given Architectural Review approval in 2022. Subsequently a permit described as “REMODEL OF EXISTING WAREHOUSE BUILDING TO ADD 2-LEVELS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS (ON NORTH, EAST & WEST OF BLDG)” was filed (permit application BLDG-2788-2022), but shows an “expired” state. Based on that, I’m not able to discern any reliable information about potential construction, completion, or occupancy dates. -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org You don't often get email from woetzell@slocity.org. Learn why this is important 2 From: Iris Kristin Deza <iriskristin.deza@RealPage.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 5:00 AM To: Planning <planning@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Project Inquiry This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Good day! I hope this email finds you well. My name is Iris Kristin Deza, Pipeline Analyst with RealPage in Dallas, TX. We here at RealPage track new multifamily housing developments in San Luis Obispo, CA. I was hoping you would be able to assist me with confirming the information we currently have regarding the Laurel Creek housing project. I have listed this info below for your review. Please let me know if this information is correct and/or if corrections need to be made. Name of community: Address: 1150 Laurel Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Total number of units at build-out: 100 Total number of floors/stories: 2 Estimated construction start date: Estimated lease start date: Estimated first move-in date: Estimated final-unit completion date: Thank you for your time, and we look forward to hearing from you. Best, Iris Kristin Deza Research Analyst | Data Analytics 2201 Lakeside Blvd | Richardson, TX 75082 www.realpage.com iriskristin.deza@RealPage.com Office: 972-820-3991 1 From:Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com> Sent:Wednesday, March 12, 2025 4:03 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Loew, Michael Cc:Patrick Smith; Robert Barnes Subject:Laurel Creek - Response to Notice and Order CODE-00007-2025 Attachments:Laurel Creek_City of San Luis Obispo - Response to Notice and Order CODE 000007-2025 - 3.12.2025.pdf; RE Laurel asbuilt cross bracing review.pdf; Laurel Creek - Notice & Order.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. On behalf of Patrick Smith and Laurel Creek, LP, please see the aƩached leƩer in response to the NoƟce and Order that was received on March 10th. Thank you, Jonathan LAUREL CREEK TO: Michael Loew & Timmi Tway FROM: Patrick Smith DATE: March 12, 2025 RE: Notice and Order – Code Case # CODE-000007-2025 This letter is written on behalf of Laurel Creek, LP, the property owner of 1150 Laurel Lane (“Property”), in response to your Notice and Order (“Notice”) dated March 10, 2025. On Monday, March 10, 2025, Mr. Loew along with two of his associates delivered the Notice to the Property owner. They also notified the tenants at the Property of their need to vacate the building, including offering to assist the tenants with relocating out of their leased premises into different properties. The Notice referenced a) expired permits (false), b) lack of appropriate fire separation and means of egress (scheduled work under the open permits), and c) diminished structural integrity as a result of removed shear bracing (false), as justification for the order to vacate. First, the referenced building permits were opened on January 22, 2025. The permits have not expired and the Notice was received just 47 days after the permits were opened. The Notice falsely states that the permits have expired. Second, with respect to the fire separation and means of egress, that is part of the work scheduled to take place as part of the open permits. Third, the notice states “…exterior wall shear bracing has been removed as part of the incomplete construction. The lack of bracing associated with the faulty construction significantly diminished the integrity of the affected walls.” This is a false statement as evidenced by the attached letter from Ashley Vance, the project engineer. This letter was provided to Mr. Loew on Friday, March 7 th, prior to his delivery of the Notice to the Property owner and tenants on Monday, March 10 th. Considering that the permits have not expired, no shear bracing has been removed and the building has not been structurally compromised, and the fire separation and means of egress work are part of the scheduled work under the open permits, we are requesting that the Notice be immediately rescinded in order to avoid further unnecessary damage caused by the City of San Luis Obispo to the Property owner and its tenants. We hope to work cooperatively with you towards completion of this project. Thank you, Patrick Smith Authorized Representative From:Loew, Michael Mloew@slocity.org Subject:RE: Laurel as-built cross bracing review Date:March 7, 2025 at 3:42 PM To :Chuck Braff chuck@westpacinv.com Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi)TTway@slocity.org Thanks Chuck, See you at 2pm on Monday. Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 2:44 PM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Laurel as-built cross bracing review This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Following up on our conversation yesterday afternoon. Please ﬁnd below an email from our structural engineer after his review of the cross bracing/ structure. In short, the structural elements of the building remain intact and have not been altered/ removed. I also wanted to add that I have been addressing concerns raised by tenants over the past two days. HASLO informed me that they have vacated the building, stating that a city ofﬁcial advised them the building was unsafe to occupy due to "structural issues." They also mentioned that the City is expediting their relocation to an alternative space in an effort to help them out. A second tenant shared that the ﬁrst was leaving (water cooler talk) and asked if they should be leaving as well. We are working diligently on the ﬁre line. Ownership has spent over 1MM in the past two months funding work per our outlined schedule shared with you previously. We would like to be moving faster. This is a complicated process and I think we’ll see work in place moving quickly again now that much of the management legwork has been completed. Our focus has been on the ﬁre line and now that that it is mostly lined out for the work to be installed we are transitioning our energies to the interior AMMR scope. Thank you again for being patient and we are looking forward to completing the work. See you Tuesday at 2pm for our site walk. If the time needs to change please just call and I will make sure to be there (I pick up my son at 250pm but can come back to site immediately following). Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 Begin forwarded message: From: Truitt Vance <truitt@ashleyvance.com> Subject: Laurel as-built cross bracing review Date: March 7, 2025 at 9:41:21 AM PST To: Chuck Braff <chuckbraff@gmail.com> Cc: Laurel Creek <laurel_creek@ashleyvance.com> Chuck, As you requested I reviewed the existing as-built plans and conﬁrmed the bracing locations shown on the original structural drawings (For Construction, March 25, 1957, S-4) are also still in place in the ﬁeld, based on a recent photo review. If it helps with some of the confusion you relayed to me, there was never any similar bracing designed in the transverse, or short direction of the building. The lateral system in this direction utilized at the time was a combination of ﬁxed truss to column as well as ﬁxed base details (S-6) on the columns. The concrete wall panels that were partial height and that were removed during construction were not contributing to the lateral stability of the building in any way. The design of the new improvements were to be structurally independent of the building and do not rely on the building for support, not contribute to it's seismic load. If you or anyone else has any other questions please let me know. Truitt -- Truitt Vance, PE d 805.592.2401 | o o 805.545.0010 x112 1229 Carmel | San Luis Obispo, CA 99999 www.ashleyvance.com 1 From:noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 18, 2025 1:39 PM To:Mezzapesa, John; mctaffe@slotcity.org Cc:Collins, Scott; Tuggle, Todd; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Corey, Tyler; Loew, Michael; Nelson, Trevor; Fiedler, Laura Subject:1150 Laurel Lane Suite 160 - Bang the Drum Attachments:Attachment A - Appeal Letter.pdf; Administative Citation Appeal Form (1150 Laurel Ln, Suite 160).pdf; Mar 17, Document 11.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. John & McKenzie, I hope you're both doing well. Unfortunately, I was out sick last week when we received the courtesy notice, but my general manager, Kimberly, has caught me up with the situation. As I understand it, due to concerns with the incomplete construction, we have 30 days to vacate the building, with a potential $100/day fee beyond that, giving us until May 7th. Kimberly mentioned that you’ve been very helpful, and we truly appreciate your support. Nevertheless, financially and emotionally, I’ve invested everything into maintaining our location on Laurel Lane since 2020 (which was a challenge in itself), and moving is not an option for us. May-July are our busiest months, and we have over $6,000 in deposits for events during that time, which we’d have to return if we can’t stay open. We’ve already had to close for three months due to construction, and the unfinished state of the building has been frustrating, to say the least. However, we understand that the City is applying pressure on the property owner to resolve safety concerns, but we’d like to explore any opportunities to remain open during this process. Could you please send us the list of code corrections that directly affect our suite? It may or may not be worth mentioning that our suite number 160 was not listed as one of the suites in the letter we received. Also, if there are any creative options, such as posting public notices or setting progress milestones, that might help us stay open, we’d greatly appreciate your guidance. For your reference, I have attached a formal appeal letter outlining our request to remain open. Please let us know when we can be scheduled for a hearing before the Construction Board of Appeals (or otherwise appropriate hearing body). Thank you again for all your help. We are looking forward to working with you towards a positive solution. -Noelle CODE-00007-2025 – APPEAL LETTER Construction Board of Appeals City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Dear Members of the Construction Board of Appeals, I am writing to formally appeal the notice issued by the City, which mandates that we vacate the premises of Bang the Drum Brewery within 30 days due to concerns regarding the safety of the property. The notice references International Property Maintenance Code Sections 111.1.1 through 111.1.5 and cites the building as unsafe. However, we respectfully contend that there is insufficient information to substantiate the claim that the structure presents a risk specific to our operation, and we request an opportunity to address any issues in a manner that allows our business to remain open. Background Information Bang the Drum Brewery has been operating at this location prior to the start of current construction project, and we hold a valid Certificate of Occupancy. This certification confirms that all building code requirements have been met for the safe operation of a restaurant at this address. While there is ongoing construction at the property, this construction is unrelated to our business operations, and no evidence has been provided to suggest that the work presents a specific danger to our restaurant’s continued operation. Lack of Evidence and Specific Concerns The notice we received cites several Municipal Code requirements related to unsafe conditions but fails to outline the specific aspects of the construction that are deemed unsafe with respect to our restaurant. We are concerned that without clarity on these specific issues, we cannot address the concerns or take any necessary actions to mitigate potential risks. Economic Hardship and Impact on Business We would like to emphasize the severe financial and emotional impact that vacating the premises would have on our business. We have already invested everything we have into moving and maintaining operations at this location. Moving to a new location is simply not an option under current circumstances, as it would require significant financial resources that are not available. The May-July period is crucial for our business as it represents our most lucrative and event- filled months of the year. Currently, we have $6,125 in deposits for private events and weddings CODE-00007-2025 – APPEAL LETTER scheduled for this period. Should we be forced to vacate the premises, we would be required to return these deposits, further exacerbating the financial strain. Additionally, we have already faced a significant setback due to the construction disruptions. We were forced to close for three months, which caused substantial losses and severely affected our ability to recover. The disorganization and unfinished state of the building have added to our frustration, and the continued uncertainty has only compounded the challenges we face. Request for Clarity and Cooperation Given the financial hardship we are facing, we respectfully request that the City provide specific details on the aspects of the construction that pose safety risks and that recommendations be provided for how we can address these concerns while continuing to operate. We are fully committed to working with the City to implement any measures necessary to mitigate risks, such as restricting occupancy or providing advanced notice to the Fire Department for events. However, t he 30-day notice to vacate does not provide us with enough time to make the necessary arrangements or take corrective action. We request a more reasonable timeframe to address any safety concerns, allowing us to continue our operations and prevent further damage to our business. The May-July period is critical for our financial survival, and losing this time would have lasting consequences that may be insurmountable for our small business. Conclusion We respectfully request that the Construction Board of Appeals review this appeal and approve the continuation of our operations while we work with the City to resolve any identified issues. We believe that with better communication and cooperation, we can reach a solution that supports local businesses and addresses safety concerns without requiring the unnecessary closure of our establishment. Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to working with you to resolve this matter. Sincerely, Bang the Drum Brewery Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Form must be received by the City Clerk within 10 days of date of citation to be considered timely filed. If no appeal is filed within ten days, the administrative citation shall be deemed final. SLMC§1.24.100(A). Revised and Published: 10/1/2024 PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS STARTING ON PAGE 2 BEFORE COMPLETING Address of Citation: 1150 Laurel Lane 1 Date of Citation: 3/10/2025 ADM or Other Cite Number: CODE-000007-2025 Municipal Code Section(s) Cited: Municipal Code Section(s) Appealed: §15.02.130 2 Appellant Name(s): Noelle Dubois & Kimberly Hancock Appellant Mailing Address(es): 1150 Laurel Lane #160 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Appellant Phone(s): (805) 242-8372 Appellant email address(es): noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com 3 If applicable Business Name: Bang the Drum Brewery Business License # 4 Appellant Cited As: Mark only one ____ Individual or Business _____ Owner of property or building X Tenant being held financially responsible for landlord citation 5 Reason for appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary. See attached letter 6 Election of Appeal Process. Choose One. Election is final. 7 Appeal Fee. (calculate using worksheet on back): $ 1,106 X Construction Board of Appeals Appeal Fee to be collected when form is submitted. Failure to pay the appropriate fee may cause your appeal to be rejected. _____ Administrative Review Board _____ Hearing Officer Office Use Only Staff initial for collection of fee _____ Date received ____________ 8 In-person Hearing. I wish to have my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to attend an in-person hearing. I understand I may submit evidence in support of my appeal up to ten (10) days in advance of the day of review and that I will receive written notice of when that day of review will be. Confirm decision to decline in-person hearing by initialing here: _______ 9 If different that the address listed in #2 above, all future notices from the City relating to this appeal should be mailed to the following Official Mailing Address: 10 Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true, and that this appeal form was executed on: ________________________________ ______________ ______________________________, California Signature of Appellant or Representative Date of Signature Place of Signature 11 Representative. If applicable, Legal counsel or agent of Appellant Name and Capacity: Address: Phone: Email address: Page 2 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Instructions Questions about this form or the appeal process should be directed to the City Attorney’s Office Email: City_Attorney@slocity.org, Phone: (805)781-7140 1.Citation Details: Describe the administrative citation received (that you are appealing) with as much detail as possible. The specific information required by the Municipal Code is listed in the form, but any identifying information you provide will assist staff to quickly complete the initial intake processing of your request to appeal. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(3)(a-b). 2.Appellant Details: Whether cited as an individual, business owner, property/building owner, or are being held financially responsible as a tenant for a citation issued to your landlord, all contact information you wish to provide to the City should be entered here. If there is more than one appellant, attach additional pages and provide the contact information for every appellant. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(1). 3.Citation Issued to a Business: For an appeal of a citation issued directly to a business (e.g. failure to timely renew a business license), please provide the additional information in part 3 of this form. The Business Name and License number should be on the renewal notice, administrative citation, or other notifications. 4.Interest in Citation: For an administrative citation issued to an individual, only that specific person may submit an appeal. Any appeal submitted by a roommate, family member, etc., on behalf of the individual cited, will be rejected. For appeals issued to a property or building, the owner or their agent may submit an appeal, as well as any tenant who is being held contractually, financially responsible for the property citation. Any legal representative or other agent of the appellant should provide their own contact details in part 11 of this form. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(2). 5.Reason for Appeal: Give a brief statement of why you are appealing, the relief or action sought, and why the administrative citation should be revoked, modified or otherwise set aside. The AMOUNT of the fine cannot be reduced on appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary, and include any audio, video, photographic, or other supporting evidence you wish to provide. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(3)(c). 6.Election of Appeal Process: Only one appeal process may be chosen, and once chosen, the election is final. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(c). All citations that include a violation of Title 15 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (building and related codes), even if other non-Title 15 code violations are also cited, must be appealed to the Construction Board of Appeals. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(1). For citations that do not include a violation of Title 15, you must make a choice between: •Administrative Review Board: If you wish to retain your right to challenge the administrative citation, or any final city action related to the citation, in court by any writ action, you must appeal to the Administrative Review Board for a more formal, comprehensive hearing to ensure preparation of an adequate administrative record. Should you wish to then challenge that board’s decision in court, you will need to file a petition for writ with the Superior Court, which may require the services of an attorney to prepare, and will require payment of the City’s costs to prepare the administrative record. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(b). •Hearing Officer: An expedited, less formal appeal process to a city hearing officer, whose final decision may be appealed directly to the superior court for de novo review pursuant to California Government Code Section 53069.4. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(a). For citations that do not include a violation of Title 15, failure to request a hearing before the Administrative Review Board within the time for the filing of an appeal will result in the appeal being assigned to a Hearing Officer and will constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies for purposes of any subsequently filed writ action. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(4). Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Page 3 7.Appeal Fee. Every path of appeal requires payment of a fee due at the time your appeal is submitted. Once your appeal is determined to be complete, timely and valid, the fee is non-refundable as it is recovery of a percentage of the cost to bring your appeal to hearing, regardless of the outcome. Fees are adopted by City Council resolution and updated annually. Use the chart below to properly calculate your appeal fee: Construction Board of Appeals, Title 15 violations Minor: related to an Alteration/Addition of an existing Single-Family or Accessory Dwelling Unit (including duplexes), a demolition permit, or any item permitted under the “Additional Building Fees” schedule $618 Moderate: related to all other permits that are processed under the alteration/addition work class, New Single-Family permits (including duplexes), and New Accessory Dwelling Unit permits $1,106 Major: related to anything that doesn’t fall into one of the other two categories $1,953 Administrative Review Board $501 Hearing Officer review, capped at $106 but could be less depending on the amount of your fine Amount of fine(s) being appealed: (1) 25% of fine(s): amount in (1) multiplied by 0.25 (2) Cost Recovery Appeal Fee Cap: (3)$106 Your appeal fee: whichever is less of (2) & (3) $ Checks should be made out to the “City of San Luis Obispo.” Payment by credit card can be facilitated by the Finance Department 1 and should be completed prior to submission of your appeal form, with a copy of the payment receipt attached to the form. Any appeal received without payment of the proper fee may be rejected. 8.Hearing Procedure: It is your right under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24, no matter which appeal process is chosen, to have an in-person hearing. However, you are under no obligation to appear. If you choose, you may elect to have your appeal reviewed on the record (all documents, pictures, etc. submitted by yourself or the City).San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.110(F). 9.Official Mailing Address: The Municipal Code requires certain notices be sent via U.S. Mail and so, while courtesy notifications may be sent via email or to other addresses, you are required to provide one official mailing address for your appeal. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.100(C)(5). 10.Signature: The step most commonly missed in the appeal process (and the most common reason for rejection of a timely appeal) is failure to sign the appeal and declare the facts stated in the appeal to be true. The form provides a signature block for this purpose but if there are multiple appellants, all must sign a declaration. Any additional declarations can be attached as additional pages. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.100(C)(5). 11.Representative of Appellant: Any legal representative or other agent assisting with the preparation of the appeal or who intends to appear at the hearing, must provide their contact information and relationship to the appellant. 1 Finance Department staff are available by phone (805)781-7124 and at the public counter, downstairs at City Hall (990 Palm Street), Monday – Thursday, 8:00am – 4:00pm 1 From:Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent:Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:11 AM To:Szentesi, Whit Cc:Tuggle, Todd Subject:Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Thanks so much Whitney for getting these back to me so quickly. Chief Tuggle, I have a follow up question for you if you can speak on what the specific dangerous conditions are? Or Whitney if you have the answer for that go ahead! Thanks again, Kaytlyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:00 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, Here are answers to your questions. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions. I’m also CCing SLO City Fire Chief Todd Tuggle here, as he is more aware of the fire codes and fire safety issues than I am. 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? Safety is our top priority and the building at 1150 Laurel Lane is dangerous in its current condition, because there are building and fire code violations that leave the tenants vulnerable to unnecessary fire risks. Unfortunately, the building owner has failed to complete required permitted construction that would make the building safe to occupy, despite repeated efforts on the City’s part to facilitate the construction. Because the 2 necessary work has not been completed and the property owner has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate, the City's Chief Building Official declared portions of the building dangerous on March 10. 2. When were they notified? The official Notice and Order was delivered to the property owner on Monday, March 10, 2025. As a courtesy, the City also contacted most of the tenants the same day. I believe Bang the Drum was notified on March 12, 2025, because their business did not open until that Wednesday. 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? I don’t have a list of the exact tenant names but tenants occupying 5 affected commercial units in the building were notified that they may need to relocate. We understand that this can be a difficult and stressful experience for the tenants, which is why the City offered to connect the tenants with community partners that support small businesses. 4. What are the next steps for the city? The next steps are really for the property owner: They must complete the work in the building to make it safe to occupy and ensure that the building meets all building and fire codes. In the meantime, the property owner must close, vacate and secure the building within 30 days of the Order and can only reopen it when it’s safe to occupy. If the property owner does not do this, the City could secure the building at the property owners’ expense. However, if and when the property owner brings this building into compliance with building and fire codes, commercial tenants will be allowed to safely occupy the space and continue to serve the public in that location. In the meantime, the City is standing by to ensure that the property owner can complete the necessary construction to make this building safe to occupy and bring the building into compliance. At the same time, our Economic Development team is standing by to connect the tenants with legal professionals, commercial property brokers and property owners, as well as community partners that support small businesses. 5. Who is the property owner? The property is owned by Laurel Creek LLC. 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? For five years, the City has been working with the property owner through the building permit process to renovate the property from a warehouse into a mixed-use building. The City proactively worked to facilitate the construction that is required to be done by the owner that would ensure the safety of the current tenants in the interim. Unfortunately, the property owner has not completed this required work and has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate. Over the past 18 months, the City has met with the property owner multiple times, visited the site to do inspections, provided itemized lists of improvements that must be completed, urged the property owner to complete the necessary work, and made staff available to facilitate permits and answer questions related to the site. The property owner was aware that the City had concerns about the lack of progress on the project. It is unclear whether the property owner notified the building’s tenants of the City’s concerns, prior to the City providing a courtesy letter to the tenants on March 10. It is up to the property owner to inform the tenants of any building issues. It’s important to note that while the City issued permits to the property owner to complete the required construction that would make the building safe, the renovations have not been done. The unfinished work has left the units without proper fire safety systems. The work can still be completed to make the building safe, but the property owner will need to complete this work prior to tenants occupying the impacted units. 3 Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:08 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:45 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Thanks for this. I’ll get back to you either today or tomorrow on these questions. For the documents you want, I would recommend submitting a formal PRA request, that way we can make sure we get you everything you need all at once. Thanks, Whit 4 From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Hey Whitney! Here are my questions: 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? 2. When were they notified? 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? 4. What are the next steps for the city? 5. Who is the property owner? 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? I'd also love to see any of the city's publicly available documents related to this, as well as things like messages between the city to the property owners and businesses, inspection reports, etc. Let me know if I need to submit a PRA for that or what the easiest route for y'all would be. Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Kayltyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com 5 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:34 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, What information would you like? Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:19 AM To: Code Enforcement <code@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi! I'm hearing that code enforcement gave Bang the Drum over on Laurel Lane a 30-day notice to vacate their spot due to some unresolved construction stuff at the property. I was wondering if I could get more information on that? Please let me know! Kaytlyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com 1 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:01 AM To:Kaytlyn Leslie Cc:Tuggle, Todd Subject:RE: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Hi Kaytlyn, Here are answers to your questions. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions. I’m also CCing SLO City Fire Chief Todd Tuggle here, as he is more aware of the fire codes and fire safety issues than I am. 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? Safety is our top priority and the building at 1150 Laurel Lane is dangerous in its current condition, because there are building and fire code violations that leave the tenants vulnerable to unnecessary fire risks. Unfortunately, the building owner has failed to complete required permitted construction that would make the building safe to occupy, despite repeated efforts on the City’s part to facilitate the construction. Because the necessary work has not been completed and the property owner has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate, the City's Chief Building Official declared portions of the building dangerous on March 10. 2. When were they notified? The official Notice and Order was delivered to the property owner on Monday, March 10, 2025. As a courtesy, the City also contacted most of the tenants the same day. I believe Bang the Drum was notified on March 12, 2025, because their business did not open until that Wednesday. 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? I don’t have a list of the exact tenant names but tenants occupying 5 affected commercial units in the building were notified that they may need to relocate. We understand that this can be a difficult and stressful experience for the tenants, which is why the City offered to connect the tenants with community partners that support small businesses. 4. What are the next steps for the city? The next steps are really for the property owner: They must complete the work in the building to make it safe to occupy and ensure that the building meets all building and fire codes. In the meantime, the property owner must close, vacate and secure the building within 30 days of the Order and can only reopen it when it’s safe to occupy. If the property owner does not do this, the City could secure the building at the property owners’ expense. However, if and when the property owner brings this building into compliance with building and fire codes, commercial tenants will be allowed to safely occupy the space and continue to serve the public in that location. In the meantime, the City is standing by to ensure that the property owner can complete the necessary construction to make this building safe to occupy and bring the building into compliance. At the same time, our Economic Development team is standing by to connect the tenants with legal professionals, commercial property brokers and property owners, as well as community partners that support small businesses. 5. Who is the property owner? The property is owned by Laurel Creek LLC. 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? For five years, the City has been working with the property owner through the building permit process to renovate the property from a warehouse into a mixed-use building. The City proactively worked to facilitate the construction that is required to be done by the owner that would ensure the safety of the current tenants in the interim. Unfortunately, the property owner has not completed this required work and has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate. 2 Over the past 18 months, the City has met with the property owner multiple times, visited the site to do inspections, provided itemized lists of improvements that must be completed, urged the property owner to complete the necessary work, and made staff available to facilitate permits and answer questions related to the site. The property owner was aware that the City had concerns about the lack of progress on the project. It is unclear whether the property owner notified the building’s tenants of the City’s concerns, prior to the City providing a courtesy letter to the tenants on March 10. It is up to the property owner to inform the tenants of any building issues. It’s important to note that while the City issued permits to the property owner to complete the required construction that would make the building safe, the renovations have not been done. The unfinished work has left the units without proper fire safety systems. The work can still be completed to make the building safe, but the property owner will need to complete this work prior to tenants occupying the impacted units. Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:08 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:45 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Thanks for this. I’ll get back to you either today or tomorrow on these questions. For the documents you want, I would recommend submitting a formal PRA request, that way we can make sure we get you everything you need all at once. Thanks, Whit 3 From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Hey Whitney! Here are my questions: 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? 2. When were they notified? 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? 4. What are the next steps for the city? 5. Who is the property owner? 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? I'd also love to see any of the city's publicly available documents related to this, as well as things like messages between the city to the property owners and businesses, inspection reports, etc. Let me know if I need to submit a PRA for that or what the easiest route for y'all would be. Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Kayltyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com 4 On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:34 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, What information would you like? Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:19 AM To: Code Enforcement <code@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi! I'm hearing that code enforcement gave Bang the Drum over on Laurel Lane a 30-day notice to vacate their spot due to some unresolved construction stuff at the property. I was wondering if I could get more information on that? Please let me know! Kaytlyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com 1 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:36 AM To:Kaytlyn Leslie Cc:Tuggle, Todd Subject:RE: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Correct, the order is just for 1150 Laurel Lane. From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:24 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Cc: Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Also to clarify, the building at 1160 Laurel Lane is not impacted by this, correct? Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:00 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, Here are answers to your questions. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions. I’m also CCing SLO City Fire Chief Todd Tuggle here, as he is more aware of the fire codes and fire safety issues than I am. 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? Safety is our top priority and the building at 1150 Laurel Lane is dangerous in its current condition, because there are building and fire code violations that leave the tenants vulnerable to unnecessary fire risks. Unfortunately, the building owner has failed to complete required permitted construction that would make the building safe to occupy, despite repeated efforts on the City’s part to facilitate the construction. Because the necessary work has not been completed and the property owner has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate, the City's Chief Building Official declared portions of the building dangerous on March 10. 2 2. When were they notified? The official Notice and Order was delivered to the property owner on Monday, March 10, 2025. As a courtesy, the City also contacted most of the tenants the same day. I believe Bang the Drum was notified on March 12, 2025, because their business did not open until that Wednesday. 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? I don’t have a list of the exact tenant names but tenants occupying 5 affected commercial units in the building were notified that they may need to relocate. We understand that this can be a difficult and stressful experience for the tenants, which is why the City offered to connect the tenants with community partners that support small businesses. 4. What are the next steps for the city? The next steps are really for the property owner: They must complete the work in the building to make it safe to occupy and ensure that the building meets all building and fire codes. In the meantime, the property owner must close, vacate and secure the building within 30 days of the Order and can only reopen it when it’s safe to occupy. If the property owner does not do this, the City could secure the building at the property owners’ expense. However, if and when the property owner brings this building into compliance with building and fire codes, commercial tenants will be allowed to safely occupy the space and continue to serve the public in that location. In the meantime, the City is standing by to ensure that the property owner can complete the necessary construction to make this building safe to occupy and bring the building into compliance. At the same time, our Economic Development team is standing by to connect the tenants with legal professionals, commercial property brokers and property owners, as well as community partners that support small businesses. 5. Who is the property owner? The property is owned by Laurel Creek LLC. 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? For five years, the City has been working with the property owner through the building permit process to renovate the property from a warehouse into a mixed-use building. The City proactively worked to facilitate the construction that is required to be done by the owner that would ensure the safety of the current tenants in the interim. Unfortunately, the property owner has not completed this required work and has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate. Over the past 18 months, the City has met with the property owner multiple times, visited the site to do inspections, provided itemized lists of improvements that must be completed, urged the property owner to complete the necessary work, and made staff available to facilitate permits and answer questions related to the site. The property owner was aware that the City had concerns about the lack of progress on the project. It is unclear whether the property owner notified the building’s tenants of the City’s concerns, prior to the City providing a courtesy letter to the tenants on March 10. It is up to the property owner to inform the tenants of any building issues. It’s important to note that while the City issued permits to the property owner to complete the required construction that would make the building safe, the renovations have not been done. The unfinished work has left the units without proper fire safety systems. The work can still be completed to make the building safe, but the property owner will need to complete this work prior to tenants occupying the impacted units. Thanks, 3 Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:08 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:45 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Thanks for this. I’ll get back to you either today or tomorrow on these questions. For the documents you want, I would recommend submitting a formal PRA request, that way we can make sure we get you everything you need all at once. Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? 4 Hey Whitney! Here are my questions: 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? 2. When were they notified? 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? 4. What are the next steps for the city? 5. Who is the property owner? 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? I'd also love to see any of the city's publicly available documents related to this, as well as things like messages between the city to the property owners and businesses, inspection reports, etc. Let me know if I need to submit a PRA for that or what the easiest route for y'all would be. Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Kayltyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:34 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, 5 What information would you like? Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:19 AM To: Code Enforcement <code@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi! I'm hearing that code enforcement gave Bang the Drum over on Laurel Lane a 30-day notice to vacate their spot due to some unresolved construction stuff at the property. I was wondering if I could get more information on that? Please let me know! Kaytlyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com 1 From:Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> Sent:Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:37 AM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Gomez, Ivana Subject:Re: cc Bramer - SLO City Church — difficulty Thanks for this. Yes, Mike let us know about the Bed Bath and Beyong facility – but rent there is 75k a month plus NNN and expenses needed for TI's – We currently pay 15k per month with no NNN and TI's complete. We will continue to work towards a long term space and are grateful for the work of Ivana and others – still the notice to vacate our current facility seems rushed and unreasonable. We're exploring our options here legally and want to work with the city to remedy the situation – allowing tenants like us, Bang The Drum, Office Hours (coworking) to maintain our presence in the city. I look forward to Mike's meeting with CJ Horstman (member of our church and architect with HAB Design) to see if there's a considerate and common sense approach we can find together. Thanks for your intentionality and care in this area Timmi – it matters so much. Blessings, Brent On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:09 AM Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brent, I am glad we were able to connect yesterday. I followed up with the planning team about the Suburban road location and they did confirm that there are Airport Area restrictions in that area. They let me know that your team has already submitted an application to get the regulations in that area changed to allow a church in that area, however the fees have not been paid, so work has not started on that process. Once they are paid (if you decide to move forward with that location) we will facilitate the processing of that application as quickly as we can, however, per the zoning code, the changes do need to go to Planning Commission, Airport Land use Commission and City council (unfortunately I cannot change that or waive those requirements). I believe Ivana Gomez is the planner who will be working on that application, so please have your team reach out to her if you have any updates or questions. I believe Mike was also in contact with your team about potential other sites we discussed, Thank you, and I hope you have a nice day, 2 Timmi From: Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 9:21 AM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: Re: cc Bramer - SLO City Church — difficulty That works well. thank you On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:51 AM Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brent, I have moved the Mayor to BCC so she isn’t on all the back-and-forth about a call this morning. I have some key staff here at the city that is available for a call at 10 am. Does that work for you? I can give you a call at the 502 number in your emails if that works, Thanks, Timmi From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 5:34 PM To: Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> 3 Cc: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: RE: cc Bramer - SLO City Church — difficulty Not a problem, I understand, Let me see if I can wrangle the correct people here with information that may be helpful and I will reach out in the morning when I hear from them, Thank you, Timmi From: Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 5:32 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Re: cc Bramer - SLO City Church — difficulty I realized in my response I didn't note a time. I'll make time in the morning if you are free then. I apologize – this news has us scrambling a bit for clarity and options. On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 5:28 PM Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> wrote: Thanks for your response. If this order is to impact us in 30 days... I wonder if the city can assist us in helping us in finding another location, expediting permits in order to gather in another venue, etc? This notice, given last week, will greatly impact our community for sure – but our community consists of roughly 2,000 of your constituents - citizens of SLO who worship here, find benevolence services here, etc. We are in the crosshairs of poor ownership, poor communication from the building owner and a lack of consideration from the city. Whatever you can do to help us navigate this news would be greatly appreciated. 4 Best, Brent Bramer On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 5:19 PM Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brent, I am happy to give you a call tomorrow to determine if there is further information our department can provide you with at this time – do you prefer morning or afternoon? I would like to also ask the Building Official to join if he is able. Please let me know, Timmi From: Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 4:58 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: Re: cc Bramer - SLO City Church — difficulty When would be a good time to meet tomorrow or Thursday? Brent Bramer 5 slocity.church 502.777.3330 On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 5:01 PM Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> wrote: Thank you for your response and connecting with me. It’s be great to meet as soon as you’re able. Best, Brent Bramer slocity.church 502.777.3330 6 On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:13 PM CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> wrote: BCC: Council All Brent Bramer, Thank you for taking the time to contact the City Council on this issue. The City Council has received your concerns and Timmi Tway, Director of Community Development who is responsible for responding is copied on this email. Timmi or a member of her staff will be following up with you within two business days. City Clerk’s Office City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 From: Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 8:36:55 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Boswell, Mike <MBoswell@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Subject: SLO City Church — difficulty This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi All, I hope you are well. I'm writing to see if you could offer any help or wisdom in how to proceed regarding the following: 7 We have been in our current facility at 1150 Laurel Lane for 2 +years. We lease all our spaces from Laurel Creek LLC. The owner of the building gained a temporary certificate of occupancy – and was charged to complete the facility. We've grown here to roughly 1,100 people (120 of which are kids) each Sunday. This past week we received a notice from the city that they were deeming the facility (in portions around our used areas) as unsafe and we must vacate in 30 days. As our team read the violations, we have many questions — but we are working with the city as best we can — though the violations are not our responsibility to address. Regardless, as you can imagine – this was shocking and seems like an unreasonable timeline. We just launched a Special Needs Ministry – we're hosting groups for hundreds of folks in our community – and we are committed to blessing the marginalized through our ongoing benevolence work. We recognize the facility we are in is not ideal for our long term use; we are currently exploring options for purchase (though with permitting, construction, etc this takes a while). All this to say – again, I'm writing to see if there is any wisdom or insight you could share on how we should proceed. From my view, displacing a place of worship from a facility the city deemed safe enough to gather 2+ years ago and every Sunday since – that impacts 1,000+ community members in 30-60 days seems unreasonable. (The building has not changed or been modified in that time frame) I shared this news with our entire church yesterday — we are looking for alternative gathering places that would accommodate the ministry off we do each week. Thanks so much for reading this – eager to hear from you — we pray for you and the city council often as you lead the way. Blessings, Brent Bramer slocity.church 502.777.3330 8 -- Brent Bramer slocity.church 502.777.3330 -- Brent Bramer slocity.church 502.777.3330 9 -- Brent Bramer slocity.church 502.777.3330 -- Brent Bramer slocity.church 502.777.3330 To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 1 From:Claxton, Jon <Jon.Claxton@icf.com> Sent:Friday, March 21, 2025 2:41 PM To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: checking in Omgosh…that is right! I forgot you were in Utilities. Sorry about that. সহ঺঻ If you find something out that you can share, I’d appreciate it. No big deal if not. Thanks! Take care! jon From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 2:40 PM To: Claxton, Jon <Jon.Claxton@icf.com> Subject: RE: checking in Hi Jon, Good to hear from you and I hope all is well in your world. I’m over in Utilities now so I don’t have quite the pulse on things as I did in CDD, but I’ll see what I can find out, and what public information I can share. Have a good weekend, Shawna From: Claxton, Jon <Jon.Claxton@icf.com> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 2:33 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: checking in This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hey Shawna – Hope all is well. (And, don’t worry, this isn’t a recruitment email. Lol….). I wanted to reach out and see if you had any insights you could share with me on the future of the Atoll Building on Laurel Lane. I just moved into this place and opened an oƯice space for ICF Jones and Stokes. I received an email yesterday that said the future of the building is uncertain as the City is going to terminate the Temporary Occupancy Permit since they haven’t completed their redevelopment project. Sounds like there is a potential that everyone is going to need to move out in the next month or so if that happens. Does this sound familiar at all to you? I understand if you cannot share any information. I wanted to ask just in case you could JON CLAXTON | Principal Biologist and Project Manager ICF | 1150 Laurel Lane, Suite 180, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 +1.805.268.6898 | jon.claxton@icf.com icf.com | LinkedIn 2 though. Hopefully, the owner of this building can get the funding to wrap this thing up. Sounds so simple, right? Haha সহ঺঻ JON CLAXTON | Principal Biologist and Project Manager ICF | 1150 Laurel Lane, Suite 180, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 +1.805.268.6898 | jon.claxton@icf.com icf.com | LinkedIn 1 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 1:41 PM To:Kaytlyn Leslie Subject:RE: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Hi Kaytlyn, Yes, an appeal was filed. I don’t have a copy of it, but I’m told that staff is working on gathering documents in response to your PRA request submitted on 3/19 and that the appeal document should be included in that response. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 12:49 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Excellent, thanks! Also wanted to check if there's been any update or new info I need to know from the city's end since I checked in last week. Planning to get a story up on this tomorrow or the next day and want to make sure I have latest info from y'all. Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com 2 On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:47 PM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Looking into it. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 11:59 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Hey Whitney! Heard there might have been an appeal filed for the 1150 Laurel Lane property code enforcement. Could you provide me with a copy of that? 3 Thanks! Kaytlyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 2:40 PM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, I believe the notice is posted on the building, but here it is for you in case you haven’t had a chance to go over there. This has all the code violations and detailed justification of our concerns. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 4 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:11 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Cc: Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Thanks so much Whitney for getting these back to me so quickly. Chief Tuggle, I have a follow up question for you if you can speak on what the specific dangerous conditions are? Or Whitney if you have the answer for that go ahead! Thanks again, Kaytlyn Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:00 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, 5 Here are answers to your questions. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions. I’m also CCing SLO City Fire Chief Todd Tuggle here, as he is more aware of the fire codes and fire safety issues than I am. 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? Safety is our top priority and the building at 1150 Laurel Lane is dangerous in its current condition, because there are building and fire code violations that leave the tenants vulnerable to unnecessary fire risks. Unfortunately, the building owner has failed to complete required permitted construction that would make the building safe to occupy, despite repeated efforts on the City’s part to facilitate the construction. Because the necessary work has not been completed and the property owner has allowed t he state of the property to deteriorate, the City's Chief Building Official declared portions of the building dangerous on March 10. 2. When were they notified? The official Notice and Order was delivered to the property owner on Monday, March 10, 2025. As a courtesy, the City also contacted most of the tenants the same day. I believe Bang the Drum was notified on March 12, 2025, because their business did not open until that Wednesday. 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? I don’t have a list of the exact tenant names but tenants occupying 5 affected commercial units in the building were notified that they may need to relocate. We understand that this can be a difficult and stressful experience for the tenants, which is why the City offered to connect the tenants with community partners that support small businesses. 4. What are the next steps for the city? The next steps are really for the property owner: They must complete the work in the building to make it safe to occupy and ensure that the building meets all building and fire codes. In the meantime, the property owner must close, vacate and secure the building within 30 days of the Order and can only reopen it when it’s safe to occupy. If the property owner does not do this, the City could secure the building at the property owners’ expense. However, if and when the property owner brings this building into compliance with building and fire codes, commercial tenants will be allowed to safely occupy the space and continue to serve the public in that location. In the meantime, the City is standing by to ensure that the property owner can complete the necessary construction to make this building safe to occupy and bring the building into compliance. At the same time, our Economic Development team is standing by to connect the tenants with legal professionals, commercial property brokers and property owners, as well as community partners that support small businesses. 5. Who is the property owner? The property is owned by Laurel Creek LLC. 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? For five years, the City has been working with the property owner through the building permit process to renovate the property from a warehouse into a mixed-use building. The City proactively worked to facilitate the construction that is required to be done by the owner that would ensure the safety of the current tenants in the interim. Unfortunately, the property owner has not completed this required work and has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate. Over the past 18 months, the City has met with the property owner multiple times, visited the site to do inspections, provided itemized lists of improvements that must be completed, urged the property owner to complete the necessary work, and made staff available to facilitate permits and answer questions related to the site. The property owner was aware that the City had concerns about the lack of progress on the project. It is 6 unclear whether the property owner notified the building’s tenants of the City’s concerns, prior to the City providing a courtesy letter to the tenants on March 10. It is up to the property owner to inform the tenants of any building issues. It’s important to note that while the City issued permits to the property owner to complete the required construction that would make the building safe, the renovations have not been done. The unfinished work has left the units without proper fire safety systems. The work can still be completed to make the building safe, but the property owner will need to complete this work prior to tenants occupying the impacted units. Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:08 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:45 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Thanks for this. I’ll get back to you either today or tomorrow on these questions. 7 For the documents you want, I would recommend submitting a formal PRA request, that way we can make sure we get you everything you need all at once. Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? Hey Whitney! Here are my questions: 1. Why was the business given an order to vacate the property? What were the concerns at the property? 2. When were they notified? 3. Were other tenants at the property told to vacate as well? If so, who? 4. What are the next steps for the city? 5. Who is the property owner? 6. Had they previously been notified of code enforcement concerns? I'd also love to see any of the city's publicly available documents related to this, as well as things like messages between the city to the property owners and businesses, inspection reports, etc. Let me know if I need to submit a PRA for that or what the easiest route for y'all would be. Thanks Whitney! Kaytlyn Kayltyn 8 Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:34 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kaytlyn, What information would you like? Thanks, Whit From: Kaytlyn Leslie <kleslie@thetribunenews.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:19 AM To: Code Enforcement <code@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Bang the Drum given notice to vacate? This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi! I'm hearing that code enforcement gave Bang the Drum over on Laurel Lane a 30-day notice to vacate their spot due to some unresolved construction stuff at the property. I was wondering if I could get more information on that? Please let me know! Kaytlyn 9 Kaytlyn Leslie She/her/hers Editor/Reporter P 805-781-7928 E kleslie@thetribunenews.com W sanluisobispo.com 1 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 5:15 PM To:psmith@westpacinv.com Cc:Loew, Michael; Jonathan@westpacinv.com Subject:Request for Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals Attachments:1150 Laurel 2025-03-25 Appeal Rejection Letter.pdf; Appeal Form.pdf Mr. Smith, We are in receipt of your submitted request to appeal the Notice and Order issued on March 10, 2025, regarding the declaration of a dangerous building located at 1150 Laurel Lane. This request was found incomplete and is therefore rejected. Please reference the attached notice for details on why it was rejected and how to resubmit the appeal if desired. If you have any questions, please contact me at (805) 781-7179 or jmezzapesa@slocity.org. John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 March 25, 2025 Laurel Creek, LP 505 Bath Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Re: Request to Appeal Notice & Order Dear Patrick Smith, On March 19, 2025, the City of San Luis Obispo received your request to appeal the Notice and Order issued on March 10, 2025, regarding the declaration of a dangerous building located at 1150 Laurel Lane. This request was incomplete and is therefore rejected. The reason(s) for this rejection include, but are not necessarily limited to: The Appeal Form must be signed by the appellant and you have not paid the appropriate appeal fee. Please reference the appeal form to determine the appropriate required fee and payment options. Please note all portions on both sides of the appeal form must be filled out to be considered complete. A blank copy of the appeal form is being enclosed with this notice. If you choose to do so, within ten (10) days of the date of this letter, the Chief Building Official must receive a written appeal that includes all required elements on the appeal form. If a complete request to appeal is not timely received, this appeal will be deemed abandoned For your convenience, a form has been enclosed to capture the necessary information. If you have any questions, please contact me at (805) 781-7179 or jmezzapesa@slocity.org. Sincerely, ____________________________ John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Enclosures: 1. Blank Appeal Form 2. Copy of received Appeal Form Please submit any supporting documents or photos with this form. Questions about this form or the appeal process? Contact the Chief Building Official at the Community Development Department (919 Palm Street) or (805)781-7157 Revised an Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals This request to appeal must be received by the Chief Building Official within 10 days of date of the associated Notice to be considered timely filed. d Published 2/05/2024 COMPLETE BOTH SIDES 1.Appellant. Name ________________________________________________________________________ Phone ____________________________ Email _________________________________________________ Mailing Address ___________________________________________________________________________ City __________________________________________ State ____________ Zip Code __________________ (If Applicable) Business Name ____________________________________ Business License # ________________________ 2.Interest in Notice & Order. (Place X in front of selection) ____A. Charged personally ____B. Charged as the owner of the property ____C. Acting as the legally authorized Agent of the cited business or homeowner 3.Notice & Order. Date of Notice __________________ Code Case Number ______________________ Address of property noticed: _______________________________________________________________________________________ Code violation(s) being appealed: 4.Reason for appeal. Give a brief statement of why you are appealing and why the notice & order should be revoked, modified, or otherwise set aside. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Any documents or photos you wish to submit in support of your appeal should be included with this form. (number of sheets attached ________). An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent of the code or the rules legally adopted thereunder have been incorrectly interpreted, the provisions of the code do not fully apply or an equivalent or better form of construction is proposed. The board shall not have authority to waive requirements of the code or interpret the administration of the code. City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle Email to: code@slocity.org OR Mail or Deliver in person to: Chief Building Official, 919 Palm St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Questions about this form or the appeal process? Contact the Chief Building Official at the Community Development Department (919 Palm Street) or (805)781-7157 Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals COMPLETE BOTH SIDES 5.Appeal Process. Per the International Property Maintenance Code Section 107, appeals will be heard by the Construction Board of Appeals, whose final decision may be challenged by writ to the superior court. Appeal before the Construction Board of Appeals must be accompanied by payment. The fee for appeal is $1,106. If the Board makes a determination that the appealed violations listed in the associated Notice & Order was applied or interpreted in error, the fee will be refunded. Please indicate form of payment below. Failure to make a selection will result in rejection of the appeal. I have read the above and choose: (Place X in front of selection) ____ A. I have included a check for $1,106 with this form . ____ B. . I request to pay by credit/debit card. Please send an electronic invoice in the amount of $1,106 to my email at I understand that if payment if not made within 5 days of receiving the requested invoice, the appeal will be rejected. 6.Election to forego an in-person hearing. It is your right to have an in-person hearing. However, you are under no obligation to appear. If you choose, you may select to have your appeal reviewed on the record (all documents, pictures, etc. submitted by yourself or the City). I want my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to appear □ 7.Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true and that this appeal form was signed on: ________________ at ________________________, __________ Date City State If different from the address in Paragraph 1, the official mailing address to receive further notices from City relating to the appeal is: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Street Address City State Zip ______________________________________ __________________________________________ Signature of Appellant Print name of Appellant Please submit any supporting documents or photos with this form. Questions about this form or the appeal process? Contact the Chief Building Official at the Community Development Department (919 Palm Street) or (805)781-7157 Revised an Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals This request to appeal must be received by the Chief Building Official within 10 days of date of the associated Notice to be considered timely filed. d Published 2/05/2024 COMPLETE BOTH SIDES 1.Appellant. Name ________________________________________________________________________ Phone ____________________________ Email _________________________________________________ Mailing Address ___________________________________________________________________________ City __________________________________________ State ____________ Zip Code __________________ (If Applicable) Business Name ____________________________________ Business License # ________________________ 2.Interest in Notice & Order. (Place X in front of selection) ____A. Charged personally ____B. Charged as the owner of the property ____C. Acting as the legally authorized Agent of the cited business or homeowner 3.Notice & Order. Date of Notice __________________ Code Case Number ______________________ Address of property noticed: _______________________________________________________________________________________ Code violation(s) being appealed: 4.Reason for appeal. Give a brief statement of why you are appealing and why the notice & order should be revoked, modified, or otherwise set aside. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Any documents or photos you wish to submit in support of your appeal should be included with this form. (number of sheets attached ________). An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the true intent of the code or the rules legally adopted thereunder have been incorrectly interpreted, the provisions of the code do not fully apply or an equivalent or better form of construction is proposed. The board shall not have authority to waive requirements of the code or interpret the administration of the code. City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle Email to: code@slocity.org OR Mail or Deliver in person to: Chief Building Official, 919 Palm St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Questions about this form or the appeal process? Contact the Chief Building Official at the Community Development Department (919 Palm Street) or (805)781-7157 Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals COMPLETE BOTH SIDES 5.Appeal Process. Per the International Property Maintenance Code Section 107, appeals will be heard by the Construction Board of Appeals, whose final decision may be challenged by writ to the superior court. Appeal before the Construction Board of Appeals must be accompanied by payment. The fee for appeal is $1,106. If the Board makes a determination that the appealed violations listed in the associated Notice & Order was applied or interpreted in error, the fee will be refunded. Please indicate form of payment below. Failure to make a selection will result in rejection of the appeal. I have read the above and choose: (Place X in front of selection) ____ A. I have included a check for $1,106 with this form . ____ B. . I request to pay by credit/debit card. Please send an electronic invoice in the amount of $1,106 to my email at I understand that if payment if not made within 5 days of receiving the requested invoice, the appeal will be rejected. 6.Election to forego an in-person hearing. It is your right to have an in-person hearing. However, you are under no obligation to appear. If you choose, you may select to have your appeal reviewed on the record (all documents, pictures, etc. submitted by yourself or the City). I want my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to appear □ 7.Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true and that this appeal form was signed on: ________________ at ________________________, __________ Date City State If different from the address in Paragraph 1, the official mailing address to receive further notices from City relating to the appeal is: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Street Address City State Zip ______________________________________ __________________________________________ Signature of Appellant Print name of Appellant 1 From:Brent Bramer <brent@slocity.church> Sent:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 4:21 PM To:C.J. Horstman; Loew, Michael Subject:Re: FW: 1150 Laurel- Question About TCO Bond Can we try to acquire those bond to complete the work? In my understanding — from recent learnings - this is common practice? Brent Bramer slocity.church 502.777.3330 On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:14 AM C.J. Horstman <c.horstman@habgroup.net> wrote: FYI Cheers, C.J. Horstman, AIA Principal Architect | CEO 2 134 W. Branch Street, Suite B. Arroyo Grande, Ca. 93420 (805) 544-4334 x104# | habgroup.net From: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 9:04 AM To: C.J. Horstman <c.horstman@habgroup.net>; Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 1150 Laurel- Question About TCO Bond There were no bonds posted for the TCO’s. Thanks, 3 Michael Loew Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Community Development E Mloew@slocity.org T 805.781.7157 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: C.J. Horstman <c.horstman@habgroup.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 4:42 PM To: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org> Subject: 1150 Laurel- Question About TCO Bond This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Guys, I was curious if the building owner posted a bond for the TCO. Sometimes this is done so that if they don’t deliver the work the City can step in and do so- in our case it could help provide some monies to finish enough work to keep some of the tenants in place. I’m sure this is already on your radar but I just wanted to be informed myself. Thanks for your help! Cheers, C.J. Horstman, AIA Principal Architect | CEO 4 134 W. Branch Street, Suite B. Arroyo Grande, Ca. 93420 (805) 544-4334 x104# | habgroup.net 1 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, March 26, 2025 4:18 PM To:Herndon, Kathrene Cc:Tuggle, Todd Subject:RE: Bang the Drum Attachments:1150 Laural Notice and Order.pdf Hi Kathrene, I’m CCing Chief Tuggle in case you have any questions about the fire safety concerns or want to schedule an interview. Below are our answers to your questions. Let me know if you have any other questions. What was found and when the notice was posted: Essentially, the City's Chief Building Official declared portions of the building dangerous in its current condition on March 10, because there are building and fire code violations that leave the tenants vulnerable to unnecessary fire risks. Safety i s obviously our top priority here and, unfortunately, the building owner has let the state of the property deteriorate and has also failed to complete required permitted construction that would make the building safe to occupy, despite repeated efforts on the City’s part to facilitate the construction. Attached is a copy of the notice that was posted with the specific details and code violations. You can also see it when you go out to the building. When they have to vacate: The property owner must close, vacate and secure the building within 30 days of the Order and can only reopen it when it’s safe to occupy. If the property owner does not do this, the City could secure the building at the property owners’ expense. However, if the property owner brings this building into compliance with building and fire codes so that it is safe to occupy , commercial tenants will be allowed operate in the space and continue to serve the public in that location. In the meantime, the City is standing by to ensure that the property owner can complete the necessary construction to make this building safe to occupy and bring the building into compliance. At the same time, our Economic Development team is standing by to connect the affected tenants with legal professionals, commercial property brokers and property owners, as well as community partners that support small businesses. How often these buildings are inspected: I don’t have that exact number but I can tell you that over the past 18 months, the City has met with the property owner multiple times, visited the site to do inspections, provided itemized lists of improvements that must be completed, urged the property owner to complete the necessary work, and made staff available to facilitate permits and answer questions related to the site. For five years, the City has been working with the property owner through the building permit process so that they can renovate the property into a mixed-use building. The City proactively worked to facilitate the construction that is required to be done by the owner that would ensure the safety of the current tenants in the interim. Unfortunately, the property owner has not completed this required work and has allowed the state of the property to deteriorate. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager 2 Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Herndon, Kathrene <Kathrene.Herndon@ksby.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 3:36 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Bang the Drum Thanks! I think just info on what was found, when the notice was given or put up, when they have to leave by, how often these buildings are inspected, etc. I think Karson is speaking with Chief Tuggle this afternoon for a different story but if he’s available tomorrow, I could send someone out. Thanks, Kathrene From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 3:33 PM To: Herndon, Kathrene <Kathrene.Herndon@ksby.com> Subject: RE: Bang the Drum Sure, what information are you looking for? I’m happy to answer any questions and schedule an interview with SLO Fire Chief Tuggle. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart External sender This message came from outside of our company. If you were not expecting this message, please use caution before clicking any links or opening any attachments. Report Suspicious ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Sure, what information are you looking for? I’m happy to answer any questions and schedule an interview with SLO Fire Chief Tuggle. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications [slocity.org] 3 Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket [kbox.slocity.org] and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page [slocitycloud.sharepoint.com] for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Herndon, Kathrene <Kathrene.Herndon@ksby.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 3:32 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Bang the Drum This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Whit, Do you have any information you can share on Bang the Drum and the nearby church being told they have to leave due to their building being deemed unsafe? Thanks, Kathrene Kathrene Herndon KSBY News Managing Editor / Executive Reporter C. 805.471.0152 E. Kathrene.herndon@ksby.com Scripps Media, Inc., certifies that its advertising sales agreements do not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity. All advertising sales agreements contain nondiscrimination clauses. Scripps Media, Inc., certifies that its advertising sales agreements do not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity. All advertising sales agreements contain nondiscrimination clauses. Community Development 91 I Palm Street. San Lui$ Obispo. CA 93401 -321 B 305.781 71 /0 slocity org Notice and Order March 10,2025 LAURE,L CREEK LP A CA LTD PTP 505 BATH STREET SANTA BARBARA, CA 9310I SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1I50 LA I,ANE SAN LUIS OBIS cA 9i401 APN:004-962-042 Code Case #: CODE-000007-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Chief Building Official has determined the buildings or structures at the above listed address to be dangerous and in need of repair, vacation and/or demolition as noted: The buildine al has determined that the bui located at I 150 Laurel Lane- inc inq all units and suites as desisnated be to be unsafe. unlawful. unfit for human and declared danserous. of 2024 T l1 #17 # #1 90.noted to be of for work relating reauired fire seoaration. among nronosed items (BLDG-205 I BI,DG-236I- 2020 &B 13-2021\. As of the date of this notice- the reouired construction bv these all the lete work of within the Additionallv- exterior wall shear hrncins has been removed as nart of fhe incomnlete The the fa integrity of the affected walls. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ 15.02.130, International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.1: (Insafe structures. An unsafe structure is one that is found to be dangerous to the life health, property or sqfety of the pubtic or the occupants of the structure by not providing minimum safeguards to protect or warn occltpants in the event offire, or because such structure contains unsafe equipment or is so damaged, decayed, dilapidatect, structurally unsafe or of suchfaulty construction or unstablefoundation, that partial or complete collapse is possible. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ 15.02.130, International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.3: Structure anJitfor human occup&ncy. A structure is unfitfor human occupancy whenever the code fficial finds that such structure is unsafe, unlawful or, because of the degree to which the stntcture is in disrepair or lacks maintenance, is insanitary, vermin or rat infested, contains filth and contamination, or lacks ventilation, illumination, sanitary or heating facilities or other essential equipment required by this code, or becattse the location of the structure constitttes a hazard to the occupants of the structure or to the public. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ 15.02.130, International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.4: I 150 Laurel #110,#175, #180, #186 and #190 March 10,2025 Page2 (lnlawful stracture. An unlawful structure is one found in whole or in part to be occupied by more persons than permitted under this code, or wes erected, altered or occupied contrary to law. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ l5.02.l30,International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.5: Dangerous stractare or premises. For the purpose of this code, any stnrclure or premises that has any or all o.f the conditions or defects described asfollows shall be considered to be dangerous: I. Any door, aisle, passageway, stairway, exit or other means of egress that does not conform to the approved building or fire code of the jurisdiction as related to the requirements for existing buildings. 4. Any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof that is not of stfficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting natural or artificial loads of one and one- halfthe original designed value. 8. Any building or structttre has been constructed, exists or is maintained in violation of any specific requirement or prohibition applicable to strch building or stntcture provided by the approved building or fire code of the jurisdiction, or of any law or ordinance to sttch an extent as to present either a substantial risk offire, building collapse or any other threat to life and safety. 10. Any building or structure, because of a lack oJ'sfficient or properfire-resistance-rated construction, fire protection systems, electrical system, fuel connections, mechanical system, plumbing system or other cause, is determined by the code fficial to be a threat to life or health. Corrective Action: The aforementioned building, including all listed units and suites (#110. #175. #180. #186 and #190) declared as dangerous, shall be vacated, secured and maintained against entry within 30 days from the date of this notice and order. Buildings shall be secured against unauthorized entry in a manner approved by the Chief Building Official or consistent with boarding standards described in Appendix A of the International Property Maintenance Code. Boarding the building up for future repair shall not extend beyond one year, unless approved by the building official. will be or besinnine April 9. 2025. of 000 vlo besinnine Mav l. 2025. The aforementioned building, including all listed units and suites declared as unlawful, shall be repaired by completing all proposed work associated with building permits BLDG-2361 -2020 & BLDG-08 13-2021, and each permit associated with tenant improvements for each unit/suite prior to granting occupancy. The above-listed building permits are required to be maintained in an "Issued" status unless an extension is authorized by the Chief Building Official prior to the expiration of these permits. Any person failing to comply with the order to vacate herein served in accordance with Section 111.4 of the International Property Maintenance Code shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor or civil infraction as determined by the local municipality, and the violation shall be deemed a strict liability offense. t 1150 Laurel #110,#175, #180, #186 and#190 March 10,2025 Page 3 If the notice and order is not complied with, the code official shall institute the appropriate proceeding at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate such violation, or to require the removal or termination of the unlawful occupancy of the structure in violation of the provisions of the cited code or of the order or direction made pursuant thereto. Any action taken by the authority having jurisdiction on such premises shall be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is located and shall be a lien upon such real estate' Upon failure of the owner, owner's authorized agent or person responsible to comply with the provisions of this notice within the time given, the property, structure or piece of regulated equipment found to be unsafe, unlawful, unfit for occupancy, and/or dangerous will be posted as such and ordered to be secured. Any occupied structure condemned and placarded by the code official shall be vacated as ordered by the code official. Any person who shall occupy a placarded premises or shall operate placarded equipment, and any owner or owner's authorized agent who shall let anyone occupy a placarded premises or operate placarded equipment shall be liable for the penalties provided by code. Upon failure of the owner or owner's authorized agent to vacate and secure the premises as described within the time specified in this order, the code official shall cause the premises to be closed and secured through any available public agency or by contract or arrangement by private persons and the cost thereof shall be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is located and shall be a lien upon such real estate and shall be collected by any other legal resource. Any person shall have the right to appeal a decision of the code fficial to the Construction Board of Appeals. Compliance with all ordered emergency measures shall be completed as outlined in this notice and within the timelines ordered regardless of appeal status. An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the intent of the cited code section(s) have been incorrectly interpreted, the provisions of the code do not fully apply or an equally good or better form of construction is proposed. The application shall be filed on a form obtained from the code fficiat within 10 days after service of this notice. Failure to appeal will constitute a waiver of all right to administrative hearing and determination of the matter. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact JohnMezzapesa at (805) 781-7179 or jmezzapesa@slocity'org. Sincere Michael Loew, Chief Building Official Cc: File Enclosures: Appendix A International Property Maintenance Standards - Boarding Standards 1 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:32 AM To:Claxton, Jon Subject:RE: checking in Hi Jon, Looks like private improvements: Orcutt Road/Broad Street - Private; ON HOLD  Lane and Sidewalk Closed.  Open to Contractors, Residents, and Emergency Vehicles  Lane and sidewalk closures due to water utility tie ins  Expect Delays: Monday through Friday, 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM  Begin Date: 09/12/2024  Estimated End Date: ON HOLD, TBD You can check for updates here: https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/public-works/construction-and-traffic-updates Thank you, Shawna From: Claxton, Jon <Jon.Claxton@icf.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 3:02 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: checking in Lol…yeah, i saw that. I need to stop being cheap and pay for the tribune subscription. I do have another question you might be able to answer. near Orcutt. What kind of utility work have they been doing on Orcutt. The underground stuff has been going on for weeks. Just curious. Thanks Shawna! Sent from my iPhone On Mar 26, 2025, at 2:48 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Jon, folks have been busy and I haven’t found out anything yet, but this was in the Tribune today: https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/business/article302367974.html From: Claxton, Jon <Jon.Claxton@icf.com> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 2:41 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: checking in 2 Omgosh…that is right! I forgot you were in Utilities. Sorry about that. সহ঺঻ If you find something out that you can share, I’d appreciate it. No big deal if not. Thanks! Take care! jon From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 2:40 PM To: Claxton, Jon <Jon.Claxton@icf.com> Subject: RE: checking in Hi Jon, Good to hear from you and I hope all is well in your world. I’m over in Utilities now so I don’t have quite the pulse on things as I did in CDD, but I’ll see what I can find out, and what public information I can share. Have a good weekend, Shawna From: Claxton, Jon <Jon.Claxton@icf.com> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 2:33 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: checking in This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hey Shawna – Hope all is well. (And, don’t worry, this isn’t a recruitment email. Lol….). I wanted to reach out and see if you had any insights you could share with me on the future of the Atoll Building on Laurel Lane. I just moved into this place and opened an office space for ICF Jones and Stokes. I received an email yesterday that said the future of the building is uncertain as the City is going to terminate the Temporary Occupancy Permit since they haven’t completed their redevelopment project. Sounds like there is a potential that everyone is going to need to move out in the next month or so if that happens. Does this sound familiar at all to you? I understand if you cannot share any information. I wanted to ask just in case you could though. Hopefully, the owner of this building can get the funding to wrap this thing up. Sounds so simple, right? Haha সহ঺঻ <image001.png> JON CLAXTON | Principal Biologist and Project Manager ICF | 1150 Laurel Lane, Suite 180, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 +1.805.268.6898 | jon.claxton@icf.com icf.com | LinkedIn 3 <image001.png> JON CLAXTON | Principal Biologist and Project Manager ICF | 1150 Laurel Lane, Suite 180, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 +1.805.268.6898 | jon.claxton@icf.com icf.com | LinkedIn 1 From:Chuck Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> Sent:Thursday, March 27, 2025 5:38 PM To:Loew, Michael Subject:Re: Laurel - Fire Loop This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. In order to be expeditious I found the permit extension form on the SLO City website and filled it out. Thanks for your help Michael. Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 On Mar 27, 2025, at 5:32 PM, Charles Braff <chuck@westpacinv.com> wrote: Michael- We wanted to extend the fire line permit so we can get the fire department back out here inspecting the fire line improvement. I spoke with Jason at the fire department and he told me we needed to go through building. I reached out to Vanessa and she has an out of office on. I am reaching out to you directly given we are trying to move quickly to get the line in. I hope that’s ok. Permit: FIRE 1268-2023 Address: 1150 Laurel Lane Can you please let me know what we need to do to get this done? I am not sure if we need to fill out an application/ extension for this. If so, happy to do so. Thank you Michael. Chuck Braff M: 310.990.6897 1 From:Beres, Jason Sent:Friday, March 28, 2025 4:50 PM To:chuck@wespacinv.com Cc:Daniel, Josh; Stanley, Erin Subject:City Permit No. 1268-2023-1150 Laurel Lane Chuck, Good afternoon. After further correspondence with the City Building Department, City permit No. 1268-2023 for 1150 Laurel Lane has been extended until 06/26/2025. Consequently, the permit applicant will not need to resubmit a permit extension request as previously discussed provided the applicant pays any pending fees associated with this permit. For further guidance, see link provided below: Dashboard The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. SelfService Public Site - San Luis Obispo, California Citizen Self Service website. Skip To Main Content. Welcome to portal home infoslo.slocity.org Once permit fees have been paid, then the contractor of record can contact the City Permit Technicians to confirm payment and they will update the permit status to "issued" for this project. Last, please be advised that all construction related inspections associated with City permit No.1268-2023 are required to be scheduled by contacting the SLOFD Inspection Line (805) 783-7775. Inspection(s) are also required to be scheduled a minimum of 48 hours in advance by the installing contractor. Just wanted to pass this information along. Thanks for the review and let me know if any additional questions arise. Thank you, Jason Beres Fire Inspector III 2 Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E jberes@slocity.org T 805.594.8021 C 805.431.3062 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Tuesday, April 1, 2025 4:09 PM To:Libbey Hanson Cc:Tuggle, Todd Subject:RE: Media Request: New Times SLO Attachments:1150 Laural Notice and Order.pdf Hi Libbey, Attached is the notice and order, which provides a detailed accounting of the code violations. The attached also has some good background info and context. I’m also CCing SLO City Fire Chief Todd Tuggle here. If you would like to speak with someone about this story, he would be the best person for you to speak with. Please let us know if you need any additional context or have any specific questions after reading the attached. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 3:21 PM To: Planning <planning@slocity.org>; Building <building@slocity.org> Subject: Media Request: New Times SLO This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi there, I am a reporter with New Times and am working on a story about the building at 1150 Lauren Ln being deemed unsafe, evicting Bang the Drum and SLO Church. Is there someone that would be able to talk with me more about this? I'm hoping for a comment from the city, some more context, and direction to find the notice order. 2 My deadline is Friday at noon if someone could chat with me sometime today, Thursday, or Friday. Thank you! Libbey -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution Community Development 91 I Palm Street. San Lui$ Obispo. CA 93401 -321 B 305.781 71 /0 slocity org Notice and Order March 10,2025 LAURE,L CREEK LP A CA LTD PTP 505 BATH STREET SANTA BARBARA, CA 9310I SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1I50 LA I,ANE SAN LUIS OBIS cA 9i401 APN:004-962-042 Code Case #: CODE-000007-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Chief Building Official has determined the buildings or structures at the above listed address to be dangerous and in need of repair, vacation and/or demolition as noted: The buildine al has determined that the bui located at I 150 Laurel Lane- inc inq all units and suites as desisnated be to be unsafe. unlawful. unfit for human and declared danserous. of 2024 T l1 #17 # #1 90.noted to be of for work relating reauired fire seoaration. among nronosed items (BLDG-205 I BI,DG-236I- 2020 &B 13-2021\. As of the date of this notice- the reouired construction bv these all the lete work of within the Additionallv- exterior wall shear hrncins has been removed as nart of fhe incomnlete The the fa integrity of the affected walls. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ 15.02.130, International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.1: (Insafe structures. An unsafe structure is one that is found to be dangerous to the life health, property or sqfety of the pubtic or the occupants of the structure by not providing minimum safeguards to protect or warn occltpants in the event offire, or because such structure contains unsafe equipment or is so damaged, decayed, dilapidatect, structurally unsafe or of suchfaulty construction or unstablefoundation, that partial or complete collapse is possible. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ 15.02.130, International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.3: Structure anJitfor human occup&ncy. A structure is unfitfor human occupancy whenever the code fficial finds that such structure is unsafe, unlawful or, because of the degree to which the stntcture is in disrepair or lacks maintenance, is insanitary, vermin or rat infested, contains filth and contamination, or lacks ventilation, illumination, sanitary or heating facilities or other essential equipment required by this code, or becattse the location of the structure constitttes a hazard to the occupants of the structure or to the public. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ 15.02.130, International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.4: I 150 Laurel #110,#175, #180, #186 and #190 March 10,2025 Page2 (lnlawful stracture. An unlawful structure is one found in whole or in part to be occupied by more persons than permitted under this code, or wes erected, altered or occupied contrary to law. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code $ l5.02.l30,International Property Maintenance Code $ 111.1.5: Dangerous stractare or premises. For the purpose of this code, any stnrclure or premises that has any or all o.f the conditions or defects described asfollows shall be considered to be dangerous: I. Any door, aisle, passageway, stairway, exit or other means of egress that does not conform to the approved building or fire code of the jurisdiction as related to the requirements for existing buildings. 4. Any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof that is not of stfficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting natural or artificial loads of one and one- halfthe original designed value. 8. Any building or structttre has been constructed, exists or is maintained in violation of any specific requirement or prohibition applicable to strch building or stntcture provided by the approved building or fire code of the jurisdiction, or of any law or ordinance to sttch an extent as to present either a substantial risk offire, building collapse or any other threat to life and safety. 10. Any building or structure, because of a lack oJ'sfficient or properfire-resistance-rated construction, fire protection systems, electrical system, fuel connections, mechanical system, plumbing system or other cause, is determined by the code fficial to be a threat to life or health. Corrective Action: The aforementioned building, including all listed units and suites (#110. #175. #180. #186 and #190) declared as dangerous, shall be vacated, secured and maintained against entry within 30 days from the date of this notice and order. Buildings shall be secured against unauthorized entry in a manner approved by the Chief Building Official or consistent with boarding standards described in Appendix A of the International Property Maintenance Code. Boarding the building up for future repair shall not extend beyond one year, unless approved by the building official. will be or besinnine April 9. 2025. of 000 vlo besinnine Mav l. 2025. The aforementioned building, including all listed units and suites declared as unlawful, shall be repaired by completing all proposed work associated with building permits BLDG-2361 -2020 & BLDG-08 13-2021, and each permit associated with tenant improvements for each unit/suite prior to granting occupancy. The above-listed building permits are required to be maintained in an "Issued" status unless an extension is authorized by the Chief Building Official prior to the expiration of these permits. Any person failing to comply with the order to vacate herein served in accordance with Section 111.4 of the International Property Maintenance Code shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor or civil infraction as determined by the local municipality, and the violation shall be deemed a strict liability offense. t 1150 Laurel #110,#175, #180, #186 and#190 March 10,2025 Page 3 If the notice and order is not complied with, the code official shall institute the appropriate proceeding at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate such violation, or to require the removal or termination of the unlawful occupancy of the structure in violation of the provisions of the cited code or of the order or direction made pursuant thereto. Any action taken by the authority having jurisdiction on such premises shall be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is located and shall be a lien upon such real estate' Upon failure of the owner, owner's authorized agent or person responsible to comply with the provisions of this notice within the time given, the property, structure or piece of regulated equipment found to be unsafe, unlawful, unfit for occupancy, and/or dangerous will be posted as such and ordered to be secured. Any occupied structure condemned and placarded by the code official shall be vacated as ordered by the code official. Any person who shall occupy a placarded premises or shall operate placarded equipment, and any owner or owner's authorized agent who shall let anyone occupy a placarded premises or operate placarded equipment shall be liable for the penalties provided by code. Upon failure of the owner or owner's authorized agent to vacate and secure the premises as described within the time specified in this order, the code official shall cause the premises to be closed and secured through any available public agency or by contract or arrangement by private persons and the cost thereof shall be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is located and shall be a lien upon such real estate and shall be collected by any other legal resource. Any person shall have the right to appeal a decision of the code fficial to the Construction Board of Appeals. Compliance with all ordered emergency measures shall be completed as outlined in this notice and within the timelines ordered regardless of appeal status. An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the intent of the cited code section(s) have been incorrectly interpreted, the provisions of the code do not fully apply or an equally good or better form of construction is proposed. The application shall be filed on a form obtained from the code fficiat within 10 days after service of this notice. Failure to appeal will constitute a waiver of all right to administrative hearing and determination of the matter. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact JohnMezzapesa at (805) 781-7179 or jmezzapesa@slocity'org. Sincere Michael Loew, Chief Building Official Cc: File Enclosures: Appendix A International Property Maintenance Standards - Boarding Standards 1 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Tuesday, April 1, 2025 10:28 AM To:noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com Cc:McDonald, Whitney; Collins, Scott; Loew, Michael; Fiedler, Laura; Tuggle, Todd; Daniel, Josh; Taffe, McKenzie Subject:RE: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery Hi Noelle, Thank you for the email, and I completely understand the situation you are in and how complicated it is. I have asked Michael Loew the Chief Building Official, cc’d here to connect with you, he will be able to answer some of your questions – do you have a number at which he can reach you? If you would like to call him, he can be reached at 805- 781-7157. As to the Certificate of Occupancy - we are aware of the Certificate of Occupancy that was issued in November of 2020 when you first opened. Unfortunately, this predated the construction that intended to redevelop the building and property. A permit for Bang the Drum’s suite was issued in 2022 to make alterations to the building that were only accessible in that suite. This is what required you to move out for a couple of months. At that time, the owner was still progressing on larger building alterations, and Bang the Drum was permitted to resume operations in April of 2023 under a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, which superseded the original Certificate. The overall building work needed to satisfy this Temporary Certificate of Occupancy has not been completed, and the permit and occupancy authorization has expired. Michael is happy to talk with you further about this or other questions if you have them, Thank you, Timmi From: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 10:32 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Fiedler, Laura <LFiedler@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Daniel, Josh <JDaniel@slocity.org>; Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery Timothea, Thank you for taking the time to respond. I do think safety is important and I understand why the City is taking action. As you can imagine, we have heard many different things from our building owner and cannot rely on the accuracy of their information to plan our future. So, we are reaching out to the City to fill out information wherever possible. 2 I do want to note, though I am not sure if it makes much difference if the safety of the entire building is compromised; however, Bang the Drum received Permanent Occupancy on November 2 nd of 2020. Do you know if this has any impact on how Bang the Drum's unit is affected? Thank you again for your time, Noelle From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 5:45 PM To: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Fiedler, Laura <LFiedler@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Daniel, Josh <JDaniel@slocity.org>; Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery BCC:City Council Noelle, Thank you for your email. I understand how impactful the Notice and Order regarding the unsafe building at 1150 Laurel is, and I am so sorry to hear how this situation effects Bang the Drum. I know you can agree that the safety of you, your staff, and your patrons is paramount. The City has been working with the property owner for a significant amount of time to encourage them to finish critical construction work to ensure the safety of the building and its inhabitants. Because of a lack of progress in completing necessary work, the nature of unfinished work at the building, and observed decline of the building and site since Temporary Certificates of Occupancy were first granted, the Chief Building Official declared portions of the building dangerous. The property owner must complete the work that the City has identified in order to ensure the safety of the building. While we understand how impactful this is to tenants, safety of the community is our top priority. Regarding a move out date – the Notice and Order provided to the property owner states that the property owner must vacate and secure the building by April 9, 2025, and they will incur daily fines for each day that the impacted units are not vacated. The Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for your unit is currently expired. I encourage you to speak with the property owner to understand their plans for vacating and securing the building per the Notice that they received from the City. We completely understand your request to the City for additional time to consider your next move and greatly appreciate the offer to work with the City to implement necessary measures to ensure the safety of the patrons, including occupancy and notifying the Fire Department. Unfortunately, the issues that make the building unsafe are not restricted to the Bang the Drum tenant space and must be addressed building-wide in order to ensure safety. Therefore, occupancy restrictions at Bang the Drum and/or Fire Department notification will not change the fundamental issues that are making the building unsafe. The property owner must undertake and complete the necessary work in order for the City to grant occupancy. Again, I encourage you to reach out to the property owner to understand what their plans are for completion of this work. The City has re-issued the necessary permits to the property owner in order to allow them to move forward with this critical building safety work and is standing by to continue to facilitate the construction process. Bang the Drum is a cherished business in our community, and I know what a critical role it plays in shaping and maintaining a vibrant, inclusive, and connected community here in the City. In your email you stated that moving is not an option for a variety of reasons, but the City’s Economic Development team (Laura and McKenzie cc’d here) is here to connect you with resources if that is helpful in any way. Please let us know. Thank you, 3 Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2025 2:34 PM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Fiedler, Laura <LFiedler@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org> Subject: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Mayor Stewart, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to request your assistance and support as we navigate the sudden and unforeseen hardship that Bang the Drum Brewery is facing. On March 10, we received a notice to vacate the premises at 1150 Laurel Lane within 30 days due to perceived safety risks. This order has caused significant distress and uncertainty, as it comes on the heels of years of perseverance in an under-construction building that we have called home since 2020. As detailed in a recent article from the Tribune, Bang the Drum Brewery, along with other tenants, has worked through ongoing construction challenges at this location. Despite the disorder and inconvenience caused by the construction, we have continuously invested in creating a welcoming and vibrant community space that serves as a gathering point for locals and visitors alike. Our brewery hosts a variety of events—from trivia nights and book clubs to inclusive dance parties—making a significant contribution to the cultural and economic vitality of San Luis Obispo. The notice to vacate came as a complete shock to us, as the city’s concerns about safety were not previously communicated. While we understand the importance of ensuring safety at the property, the abrupt 30-day timeline feels like an insurmountable obstacle. Economic Resiliency, Cultural Vitality, and Community Impact: The City has made clear its commitment to economic resiliency, cultural vitality, and fiscal sustainability, and we believe that this situation underscores the need for a thoughtful, compassionate approach. Bang the Drum Brewery has been a vibrant part of the local culture, contributing to the diversity and vibrancy of our community. One of those community groups being the LGBTQ+ community who is in increasing need of safe spaces. We provide a welcoming space for people to connect, enjoy the arts, and celebrate their shared interests, all while supporting local businesses. To lose our space now, in the midst of the ongoing construction and the critical May-July months, would severely impact our ability to recover from the substantial setbacks we’ve already faced. As mentioned in the 4 article, the disruption caused by previous construction delays has already taken a toll on our financial stability, and being forced to relocate is simply not an option given the resources and time required to rebuild. The costs of moving and securing a new location would be insurmountable at this point, especially after the extensive investment we’ve made in creating a unique and welcoming atmosphere for our patrons. A Request for Support: To be completely honest with you, I am not good at negotiating. It feels best to me to be transparent and just start by asking for what we absolutely need. We understand there are aspects of this project that are beyond immediate repair. We now understand that, regardless of the cost to our business, a long term future here is unlikely and/or inadvisable. Being able to operate May, June and July is the shortest amount of time that would give us and our customers the greatest impact. That timeline would allow us to continue into our future with the best fighting chance. The other crucial component is that we need definitive information on a hard move out date as fast as humanly possible. Operating our business with uncertainty becomes increasingly detrimental as the days go on. Our employees need to know their future. We need to tell the customers who booked private events (including weddings) May-July if they need to find another location. If we do not have definitive information, all of the people who rely on and interact with this business will become more and more uneasy which will greatly affect any remaining time we have here. We know this impact because we have had to temporarily close under an uncertain timeline at this very location. I understand that there are so many components to running anything, from a business to the City, and the public’s well-being is on your shoulders, and if there is anything that can be done, this is the very bare bones of what we are asking. Given these circumstances, we respectfully request your support in finding a reasonable compromise that allows us to remain open through July which would allow us to be a safe space to our queer community during Pride Month and honor the weddings (one of them being queer) we have booked in July. We are fully committed to working with the City to implement any necessary measures to ensure the safety of our patrons, such as occupancy restrictions or notifying the Fire Department in advance for events. However, the 30-day notice to vacate does not provide us with enough time to make the necessary adjustments or mitigate the financial impact. We understand that safety is a top priority, and we are eager to collaborate with the City. Thank you for your time, understanding, and consideration. We are hopeful that, with your support, we can find a solution that allows us to continue contributing to the City’s vision of a resilient and thriving community. Best regards, Noelle DuBois Owner, Bang the Drum Brewery 1 From:noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent:Tuesday, April 1, 2025 2:27 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:McDonald, Whitney; Collins, Scott; Loew, Michael; Fiedler, Laura; Tuggle, Todd; Daniel, Josh; Taffe, McKenzie Subject:Re: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery Timmi, Thank you very much for that information. We had no idea that we have been operating on a TCO for 2 years and this information makes sense of the notice and the emails stating that our Temporary Occupancy has expired. My wife, Renee is helping me gather information as we have a lot coming at us right now so she will give Michael a call and her number is ( but my number is also ( for the future. Thank you again for this enlightening information. Noelle From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 10:27 AM To: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Fiedler, Laura <LFiedler@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Daniel, Josh <JDaniel@slocity.org>; Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery Hi Noelle, Thank you for the email, and I completely understand the situation you are in and how complicated it is. I have asked Michael Loew the Chief Building Official, cc’d here to connect with you, he will be able to answer some of your questions – do you have a number at which he can reach you? If you would like to call him, he can be reached at 805- 781-7157. As to the Certificate of Occupancy - we are aware of the Certificate of Occupancy that was issued in November of 2020 when you first opened. Unfortunately, this predated the construction that intended to redevelop the building and property. A permit for Bang the Drum’s suite was issued in 2022 to make alterations to the building that were only accessible in that suite. This is what required you to move out for a couple of months. At that time, the owner was still progressing on larger building alterations, and Bang the Drum was permitted to resume operations in April of 2023 under a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, which superseded the original Certificate. The overall building work needed to satisfy this Temporary Certificate of Occupancy has not been completed, and the permit and occupancy authorization has expired. Michael is happy to talk with you further about this or other questions if you have them, Thank you, Timmi 2 From: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 10:32 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Fiedler, Laura <LFiedler@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Daniel, Josh <JDaniel@slocity.org>; Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery Timothea, Thank you for taking the time to respond. I do think safety is important and I understand why the City is taking action. As you can imagine, we have heard many different things from our building owner and cannot rely on the accuracy of their information to plan our future. So, we are reaching out to the City to fill out information wherever possible. I do want to note, though I am not sure if it makes much difference if the safety of the entire building is compromised; however, Bang the Drum received Permanent Occupancy on November 2 nd of 2020. Do you know if this has any impact on how Bang the Drum's unit is affected? Thank you again for your time, Noelle From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 5:45 PM To: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Fiedler, Laura <LFiedler@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Daniel, Josh <JDaniel@slocity.org>; Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery BCC:City Council Noelle, Thank you for your email. I understand how impactful the Notice and Order regarding the unsafe building at 1150 Laurel is, and I am so sorry to hear how this situation effects Bang the Drum. I know you can agree that the safety of you, your staff, and your patrons is paramount. The City has been working with the property owner for a significant amount of time to encourage them to finish critical construction work to ensure the safety of the building and its inhabitants. Because of a lack of progress in completing necessary work, the nature of unfinished work at the building, and observed decline of the building and site since Temporary Certificates of Occupancy were first granted, the Chief Building Official declared portions of the building dangerous. The property owner must complete the work that the City has identified in order to ensure the safety of the building. While we understand how impactful this is to tenants, safety of the community is our top priority. Regarding a move out date – the Notice and Order provided to the property owner states that the property owner must vacate and secure the building by April 9, 2025, and they will incur daily fines for each day that the impacted units are not vacated. The Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for your unit is currently expired. I encourage you to speak with 3 the property owner to understand their plans for vacating and securing the building per the Notice that they received from the City. We completely understand your request to the City for additional time to consider your next move and greatly appreciate the offer to work with the City to implement necessary measures to ensure the safety of the patrons, including occupancy and notifying the Fire Department. Unfortunately, the issues that make the building unsafe are not restricted to the Bang the Drum tenant space and must be addressed building-wide in order to ensure safety. Therefore, occupancy restrictions at Bang the Drum and/or Fire Department notification will not change the fundamental issues that are making the building unsafe. The property owner must undertake and complete the necessary work in order for the City to grant occupancy. Again, I encourage you to reach out to the property owner to understand what their plans are for completion of this work. The City has re-issued the necessary permits to the property owner in order to allow them to move forward with this critical building safety work and is standing by to continue to facilitate the construction process. Bang the Drum is a cherished business in our community, and I know what a critical role it plays in shaping and maintaining a vibrant, inclusive, and connected community here in the City. In your email you stated that moving is not an option for a variety of reasons, but the City’s Economic Development team (Laura and McKenzie cc’d here) is here to connect you with resources if that is helpful in any way. Please let us know. Thank you, Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2025 2:34 PM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Fiedler, Laura <LFiedler@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org> Subject: Request for Support in Resolving Safety Concerns for Continued Operation of Bang the Drum Brewery This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Mayor Stewart, Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to request your assistance and support as we navigate the sudden and unforeseen hardship that Bang the Drum Brewery is facing. On March 10, we received a notice to vacate the premises at 1150 Laurel Lane within 30 days due to perceived safety risks. This order has caused 4 significant distress and uncertainty, as it comes on the heels of years of perseverance in an under-construction building that we have called home since 2020. As detailed in a recent article from the Tribune, Bang the Drum Brewery, along with other tenants, has worked through ongoing construction challenges at this location. Despite the disorder and inconvenience caused by the construction, we have continuously invested in creating a welcoming and vibrant community space that serves as a gathering point for locals and visitors alike. Our brewery hosts a variety of events—from trivia nights and book clubs to inclusive dance parties—making a significant contribution to the cultural and economic vitality of San Luis Obispo. The notice to vacate came as a complete shock to us, as the city’s concerns about safety were not previously communicated. While we understand the importance of ensuring safety at the property, the abrupt 30-day timeline feels like an insurmountable obstacle. Economic Resiliency, Cultural Vitality, and Community Impact: The City has made clear its commitment to economic resiliency, cultural vitality, and fiscal sustainability, and we believe that this situation underscores the need for a thoughtful, compassionate approach. Bang the Drum Brewery has been a vibrant part of the local culture, contributing to the diversity and vibrancy of our community. One of those community groups being the LGBTQ+ community who is in increasing need of safe spaces. We provide a welcoming space for people to connect, enjoy the arts, and celebrate their shared interests, all while supporting local businesses. To lose our space now, in the midst of the ongoing construction and the critical May-July months, would severely impact our ability to recover from the substantial setbacks we’ve already faced. As mentioned in the article, the disruption caused by previous construction delays has already taken a toll on our financial stability, and being forced to relocate is simply not an option given the resources and time required to rebuild. The costs of moving and securing a new location would be insurmountable at this point, especially after the extensive investment we’ve made in creating a unique and welcoming atmosphere for our patrons. A Request for Support: To be completely honest with you, I am not good at negotiating. It feels best to me to be transparent and just start by asking for what we absolutely need. We understand there are aspects of this project that are beyond immediate repair. We now understand that, regardless of the cost to our business, a long term future here is unlikely and/or inadvisable. Being able to operate May, June and July is the shortest amount of time that would give us and our customers the greatest impact. That timeline would allow us to continue into our future with the best fighting chance. The other crucial component is that we need definitive information on a hard move out date as fast as humanly possible. Operating our business with uncertainty becomes increasingly detrimental as the days go on. Our employees need to know their future. We need to tell the customers who booked private events (including weddings) May-July if they need to find another location. If we do not have definitive information, all of the people who rely on and interact with this business will become more and more uneasy which will greatly affect any remaining time we have here. We know this impact because we have had to temporarily close under an uncertain timeline at this very location. I understand that there are so many components to running anything, from a business to the City, and the public’s well-being is on your shoulders, and if there is anything that can be done, this is the very bare bones of what we are asking. Given these circumstances, we respectfully request your support in finding a reasonable compromise that allows us to remain open through July which would allow us to be a safe space to our queer community during Pride Month and honor the weddings (one of them being queer) we have booked in July. We are fully committed to working with the City to implement any necessary measures to ensure the safety of our patrons, such as occupancy restrictions or notifying the Fire Department in advance for events. However, the 30-day notice to vacate does not provide us with enough time to make the necessary adjustments or mitigate the financial impact. We understand that safety is a top priority, and we are eager to collaborate with the City. Thank you for your time, understanding, and consideration. We are hopeful that, with your support, we can find a solution that allows us to continue contributing to the City’s vision of a resilient and thriving community. 5 Best regards, Noelle DuBois Owner, Bang the Drum Brewery 1 From:Wynn, Eva Sent:Wednesday, April 2, 2025 5:19 PM To:Shioji, David @ Los Angeles Subject:RE: Inquiry at 1150 Laurel Ln Hi David, Thank you for clarifying and thanks for your patience with my response. There was an Architectural Review application (ARCH-0188-2023), and a Planned Development application (PDEV-0189-2023) submitted in 2023. The applicant was given an incomplete letter detailing the request for more information in May of 2023, but never provided additional information. Per section 17.104.060 of the Municipal Code, these applications would be considered withdrawn. Effectively, no progress has been made on the 400+ residential units. The general timeline to entitle the site would be about the same as in 2023 (18 months after the applications are deemed complete), except that the building at 1150 Laurel has been deemed a safety hazard by the Building Official. The ongoing code enforcement case should be addressed prior to planning entitlements. At this time, I do not have a timeline estimate on the code case. I can gather more information if you need. Let me know if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Eva Wynn Planning Technician Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EWynn@slocity.org T 805.781.7172 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Shioji, David @ Los Angeles <David.Shioji@cbre.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 1:33 PM To: Wynn, Eva <EWynn@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Inquiry at 1150 Laurel Ln This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Eva, I am working on an updated appraisal for the property, which was last appraised in March 2023. I know the warehouse area is currently under construction for 100 units, but I wanted to see if there has been any progress on the entitlements for the remainder of the site (447 (or 456) residential units on APN’s 004-962-036, 004-962- 037, and 004-962-043). 2 The 2023 appraisal notes that the following items were needed for the 447 units to be approved:  a formal project submittal, with an application process taking 18 months  a transfer of excess development rights, “requiring a rezone application, approval of a Planned Development Overlay, major development review, and City Council approval.” Just want to confirm if the project has been submitted, and if not, the general timeline remaining to entitle the site. Also, if the development rights tranfer needs such an extensive process, as it is already covenanted. Pretty heady stuƯ. Thank you for looking into this! David David Shioji Vice President CBRE | Valuation & Advisory Service 400 S Hope Street, 25th Floor | Los Angeles, CA 90071 T +1 213 613 3261 | C +1 310 968 9030 david.shioji@cbre.com | LinkedIn Follow CBRE: CBRE.com | LinkedIn | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook From: Wynn, Eva <EWynn@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 9:50 AM To: Shioji, David @ Los Angeles <David.Shioji@cbre.com> Subject: Inquiry at 1150 Laurel Ln External Hi David, I received a message that you are looking for information regarding 1150 Laurel Lane. It sounded like you had questions about planning entitlements but there are a lot of applications associated with1150 and 1160 Laurel. Could you please provide more details for what information you are looking for? If it is information from a specific year, or regarding specific descriptions, that will help me sort our documents. Sincerely, Eva Wynn Planning Technician Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EWynn@slocity.org T 805.781.7172 slocity.org 3 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Details about the personal data CBRE collects and why, as well as your data privacy rights under applicable law, are available at CBRE – Privacy Policy. 1 From:Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent:Wednesday, April 2, 2025 3:59 PM To:Tuggle, Todd Subject:Re: Media Request: New Times SLO Hi Todd, 4:15 sounds good! I will give you a call then. Thanks, Libbey On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 2:37 PM Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Libby, I was talking about today, but it looks like I missed your reply. If you want to chat, give me a call about 4:15 and we can discuss 1150 Laurel. Todd Tuggle pronouns he/him/his Fire Chief To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department 2160 Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E ttuggle@slocity.org C 805.858.0435 slocity.org To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 1:17 PM To: Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media Request: New Times SLO Hey Todd, Thanks so much! To confirm, this is for 2pm today? Or sometime Thursday or Friday? Thanks! Libbey 801-837-0481 On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 12:53 PM Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> wrote: Good afternoon Libby, sorry for the delay, I have been in meetings all morning. I am available at 2 to discuss the 1150 Laurel property, if that works for you. I have an interview with a prospective job candidate at 3. 2 Todd Tuggle pronouns he/him/his Fire Chief To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department 2160 Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E ttuggle@slocity.org C 805.858.0435 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2025 11:08 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Cc: Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media Request: New Times SLO Thank you so much, Whit! I appreciate you sending the notice and connecting me with Todd. Todd, I know that Bang the Drum is trying to stay in its current building. I am curious if we could discuss the potential of this and what the options are for the business. I am also curious if something like this has happened before in SLO where companies are forced out due to its landlord's not taking proper steps and being in compliance. I'm available Thursday and Friday for a phone call if you let me know what time works best for you. Thanks! Libbey On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 4:09 PM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Libbey, Attached is the notice and order, which provides a detailed accounting of the code violations. The attached also has some good background info and context. I’m also CCing SLO City Fire Chief Todd Tuggle here. If you would like to speak with someone about this story, he would be the best person for you to speak with. Please let us know if you need any additional context or have any specific questions after reading the attached. 3 Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 3:21 PM To: Planning <planning@slocity.org>; Building <building@slocity.org> Subject: Media Request: New Times SLO This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi there, I am a reporter with New Times and am working on a story about the building at 1150 Lauren Ln being deemed unsafe, evicting Bang the Drum and SLO Church. Is there someone that would be able to talk with me more about this? I'm hoping for a comment from the city, some more context, and direction to find the notice order. 4 My deadline is Friday at noon if someone could chat with me sometime today, Thursday, or Friday. Thank you! Libbey -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn 5 MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. MY805TIX 1 From:Shoresman, Michelle Sent:Wednesday, April 2, 2025 9:08 AM To:Jackson Havoc Subject:Re: Support Bang the Drum! Hi Jackson, I just wanted to thank you and the rest of the community that has really stood behind Bang the Drum, this community gem that means so much to so many. I have been in contact with the owners as have city staff and we will continue to do what we can to support them, while also making sure we maintain safety of the users of 1150 Laurel and the community as a whole. Thanks again for standing with them in this difficult time. ᤻᤹᤺ Michelle From: Jackson Havoc <houseofmellohavoc@gmail. Tuesday, April 1, 2025 2:21:25 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: Support Bang the Drum! This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ To SLO City Council, I am heartbroken and disappointed to hear that Bang the Drum, a hub and heart of community, has been given impossibly short notice to close their doors. I am a local leader in the LGBTQ+ community and Bang the Drum has been a generous host and business partner to events that celebrate queer art, entertainment, culture, and community. I have hosted a number of LGBTQ+ and inclusive events there with over a hundred attendees, including events open to families. There is no other business in SLO that is as allied and supportive of the local queer of community where we can readily convene in these numbers. Bang the Drum closing their doors just before Pride month would be a devastating loss to the local LGBTQ+ community. I do not believe the city did due diligence in communicating the safety risk and code violations, and if anyone from the city had made this effort and gone to the venue they would clearly understand that 30 days is not nearly enough time to vacate a building that the owners have put so much work into. It is a one of a kind establishment. It is the perfect location for this venue/business. And I believe the City should do everything in its power to support Bang the Drum in keeping its doors open through July of this year at minimum. If the business closes any earlier they will likely go out of business permanently. This would be a huge loss. If that is the case, I believe the City has a clear role in the loss of this vital business from the local community, culture and economy. The City should have been more proactive in communicating with the business owners and not assuming a landlord who has dragged its feet for over five years would appropriately communicate to their tenants. I believe the landlord should be forced to sell the property to someone that will prioritize necessary repairs immediately, or that the City should take it over and use the rent from existing tenants to cover the required repairs. I sincerely believe this city will be significantly worse off without this beloved establishment, and I know for a fact that the queer community will be devastated by this loss as there is no alternative business venue within the city that is queer and women owned with the capacity to host events of 2 the size and nature that Bang the Drum has proudly supported for years. Please, Save Bang the Drum! Jackson Havoc SLO Resident & Drag King 1 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Thursday, April 3, 2025 2:32 PM To:Jonathan Branoff; Patrick Smith Cc:Loew, Michael Subject:RE: Request for Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals Attachments:1150 Laurel 2025-04-03 Invoice for CBOA.pdf Hi Jonathan, Thank you for the completed form. I have attached a copy of the invoice for payment. To pay the invoice please navigate to the InfoSLO website and click the “Pay Invoices” tab at the top of the page. You will need to enter the full invoice number (00038977), including all the zeros, to find the invoice. Once found, you will click the blue “Pay Now” button at the top of the page and follow the prompts to enter the required information for payment. Payment will need to be received by end of day tomorrow (April 4th) for the appeal to be considered complete and timely. Let me know if you have any questions. John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 10:33 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com> Cc: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Request for Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Thanks, John. The complete form is attached here. I’ve also attached the original pdf with the supplemental information. If you could please email an invoice for the fee we will submit payment by credit card right away. Thanks, 2 Jonathan From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 5:15 PM To: Patrick Smith <psmith@westpacinv.com> Cc: Loew, Michael <Mloew@slocity.org>; Jonathan Branoff <Jonathan@westpacinv.com> Subject: Request for Appeal to Construction Board of Appeals Mr. Smith, We are in receipt of your submitted request to appeal the Notice and Order issued on March 10, 2025, regarding the declaration of a dangerous building located at 1150 Laurel Lane. This request was found incomplete and is therefore rejected. Please reference the attached notice for details on why it was rejected and how to resubmit the appeal if desired. If you have any questions, please contact me at (805) 781-7179 or jmezzapesa@slocity.org. John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 INVOICE (00038977) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT LAUREL CREEK LP A CA LTD PTP 505 BATH St SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00038977 04/03/2025 05/03/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL CODE-000007-2025 Access Board of Appeals - BLDG Moderate $1,106.00 $1,106.00 SUBTOTAL1150 Laurel Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 TOTAL $1,106.00 Page 1 of 1April 03, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo 1 From:Kimberly Hancock <kimberly@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent:Friday, April 4, 2025 6:05 PM To:Taffe, McKenzie; noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com Cc:Hanh, Hannah Subject:Re: Moving Bang the Drum Thank you McKenzie! Noelle and I will look over this tomorrow! Thank you for putting together this information! Thank you, Kimberly From: Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 12:15 PM To: noelle bangthedrumbrewery.com <noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com>; Kimberly Hancock <kimberly@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Cc: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Moving Bang the Drum I also wanted to add that Antigua Brewing at 1009 Monterey Street is a great option for relocation. I added it to the table below. I spoke with the property owner Steve Rossi this morning to confirm that the space is available as the current business is nearing the end of their lease with an option for a new tenant to sublease. Additionally, they have the same type 23 license that expires in September of this year that could potentially be transferred if the current business owners were interested in transferring to you. The City recently purchased a parking lot (Lot 11 on Toro and Higuera) just up the street, which opens up parking spaces on that side of town. Let me know if you have any questions. McKenzie Taffe Economic Development Analyst City Administration Economic Development & Tourism 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mctaffe@slocity.org T 805.781.7155 C 805.748.9882 From: Taffe, McKenzie Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 11:06 AM To: noelle@bangthedrumbrewery.com; Kimberly Hancock <kimberly@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Cc: Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Moving Bang the Drum 2 Hi Noelle and Kimberly, Thank you for coming to City Council Tuesday- I’m glad we were able to meet despite the circumstances. Bang the Drum has a special place in my heart and in our community and we will do whatever we can to keep your business in San Luis Obispo. I have a lot of information detailed below, but I am available to meet with you in person whenever is convenient to go through all of this. Business Assistance I would highly recommend becoming a client of the SBDC or MCSC. They have free consultants for all aspects of opening and operating a business and can also connect you with Small Business Administration loans to assist with relocation costs. There are also grants available to LGBTQ+ and women-owned businesses that I think your business would be eligible for. I’ve included links to those below: Grant Amount Application Opening Date Application Deadline National Pride Grant for LGBTQIA+ Small Businesses $1000 April 22, 2025 - Amber Grant for Women $10,000- 25,000 Open Now April 30, 2025 NGLCC Community Impact Grant Program $5000- $25,000 Not Yet Announced - Transform Grant $1,000 Not Yet Announced - Queer to Stay Grant - Not Yet Announced - Business Relocation As you’re looking for potential sites to move to, here are some things to keep in mind: Bars and Live Entertainment venues require a Minor Use Permit ($3,612.93). Site 2475 Victoria 695 Clarion Court Suite B Big Sky Café 1121 Broad 1009 Monterey Street Antigua Brewing Zoning C-S-SF/C-R-SF (Service Commercial, Retail Commercial with Special Focus Area Overlay Zone) C-S-SP (Commercial Service Specific Plan) C-D-H (Downtown Commercial with Historic Overlay) C-D-H (Downtown Commercial with Historic Overlay) Specific Plan/ Area Plan requirements Broad Street Area (live entertainment identified as nightclub) Airport Area Specific Plan- In the C-S zone, nightclubs (i.e., live entertainment) must contain a minimum of four thousand five hundred square feet of floor area. The required use permit process shall address parking, neighborhood compatibility, and security issues - Permit Needed Minor Use Permit Minor Use Permit Minor Use Permit Minor Use Permit Contact Erik Berg-Johanson Ric Paul Don Daniels Steve Rossi Use this table to review the zones where bars and live entertainment would be allowed: C-C, C-R, C-D,C-T, C-S, and M zones allow bars and live entertainment uses with minor use permit approval. 3 From there, review the City zoning map which displays the zones by color. You can compare those zones to available commercial properties. I use LoopNet to find available commercial real estate online, but there are many available spaces that aren’t listed online. Here is a real estate brochure I created recently which has some available restaurant spaces in town. I am happy to connect you with property owners and brokers as needed. You’ll also need to make sure that your venue complies with standards for fire and building codes and has sufficient parking to accommodate your use. I can connect you with our Planning and Building staff if you want to proceed and they can answer more specific questions. Hannah Hahn, CC’d here, is our Associate Planner and our expert on Minor Use Permits. McKenzie Taffe Small Business Concierge City Administration Economic Development & Tourism 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mctaffe@slocity.org T 805.781.7155 C 805.748.9882 From: Kimberly Hancock <kimberly@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:07 AM To: Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Moving Bang the Drum Thank you! From: Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 11:41 AM To: Kimberly Hancock <kimberly@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Subject: RE: Moving Bang the Drum Hi Kimberly, Great meeting with you today despite the circumstances. Here are the resources we discussed: https://slobar.org/information-and-referral-service/ https://sbdc.calpoly.edu/getting-started/ And here are the links to available properties in SLO:  695 Clarion Court: https://rspaulcompany.com/available-properties  Duncan Alley: https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/3197-Duncan-Ln-San-Luis-Obispo-CA/24103610/  Big Sky Café: Lease: https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/1121-Broad-St-San-Luis-Obispo-CA/34675009/ Sale: https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/1121-Broad-St-San-Luis-Obispo-CA/34675025/ 4 I checked on the SLO Ranch Farms restaurant and it looks like that has already been leased. I will make some phone calls to the property owners today and give them your contact information. Please let me know how I can be of service, McKenzie Taffe Economic Development Analyst City Administration Economic Development & Tourism 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E mctaffe@slocity.org T 805.781.7155 From: Kimberly Hancock <kimberly@bangthedrumbrewery.com> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 10:17 AM To: Taffe, McKenzie <mctaffe@slocity.org> Subject: Moving Bang the Drum This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hello McKenzie, I would like to discuss what at the next steps to moving Bang the Drum. What options do we have? I am still waiting to talk to Noelle, Bang the Drum's owner. She has been ill. However, we need to move forward since we have a very short time to work. You are welcome to call me at my phone number Kimberly Hancock General Manager 805.299.5080 1150 Laurel Ln Suite 160 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 1 From:Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent:Friday, April 4, 2025 2:30 PM To:Szentesi, Whit Subject:Re: Media Request: New Times SLO You are amazing, Whit! Thank you! On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 2:02 PM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Libbey, Thanks for your patience. Here are answers to your questions: 1. After public comment on 4/1, many asked the city if it could be "creative" with solutions for Bang the Drum. Are creative solutions a possibility under safety policies? We are open to creative solutions so long as they are within the confines of the law and if the property owner is willing to resume the work necessary to make the building safe. City staff members have met with several of the tenants to answer questions about various solutions or options that they may have. The City continues to make staff available to the property owner to facilitate the repair work needed to ensure the building’s safety. We are standing by to continue to issue building permits, complete inspections, or answer questions. In the meantime, City staff will continue to work with tenants as they explore options for their businesses. 2. Many criticized that Bang the Drum could stay in the building longer and that the owners would only receive fees. Why is this? Are there other solutions, considering they technically could stay longer and only receive fees? The City does not advise continued use of the building beyond the current warehousing activities. The building is dangerous in its current condition for all other affected units and remains unfit for human occupancy. The notice and order are clear: If the property owner does not repair or vacate the building 30 days after the notice and order was posted, the City will increase enforcement. That means, on April 9 th, if the building is not repaired or vacated, the City will start imposing daily fines against the property owner to enforce the order and motivate the owner to do the right thing. 3. Public commenters also noted this feels like punishment for smaller businesses who take the brunt for unethical larger companies' actions, and that Laurel LLC did not provide sufficient communication to the tenants about the building's condition. Is the city considering changing its policies to allow the city to interact with tenants alongside owners to ensure a situation like this doesn't happen again? We know that this situation is stressful for the tenants, and we are doing everything we can to support them and connect them to resources that will help. The City provided the tenants with a courtesy letter explaining the situation and offering the City’s assistance on the same day we posted the notice and order for the property owner to repair or vacate the building. City staff visited the building that day and spoke with tenants, hand delivering the courtesy letter. It’s important for people to know that the City does not typically do this but, in this case, we knew that the tenants needed to be informed as soon as possible so that they could make arrangements. Since then, the City has had a number of conversations with tenants to keep them informed, and we continue to provide them with information as they determine what their options are. However, the policy change suggested here could result in improper interference with the private contractual relationships between landlords and tenants. The violations of City code and adopted state law at issue are and have been the responsibility of the property owner, and throughout the City’s enforcement, permitting, and inspection processes, communication regarding those violations was, therefore, between the City and the 2 property owner. The City’s expectation is that property owners who are aware of code violations and safety risks in their buildings are communicating such risks to their tenants in a timely and accurate manner. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Whit BCC: Email Council Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 8:59 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media Request: New Times SLO Thanks, Whit! You've been super helpful. Best, Libbey 3 On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 5:07 PM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Okay, I will do my best. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Do you need communications support? My team is here to support you with your public communications needs. Whether you need help with strategic communications planning, content development or production, or something else, please submit a KBOX ticket and fill out the form to get your request in the queue. Not sure what you need? Visit the City’s Communications Program Sharepoint page for tips and tricks, guides, and helpful resources. From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 3:48 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media Request: New Times SLO Thanks so much! My deadline is 3pm tomorrow if possible. 4 Best, Libbey On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:46 PM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Go it, thanks! Working on getting these answers now. What’s your deadline on this? — Public Communications Manager City of San Luis Obispo C: 805.440.5446 **Please pardon typos. This message was sent via mobile device. From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 2:39:15 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media Request: New Times SLO Thanks Whit! Yes, I was able to chat with Chief Toggle this morning! Thank you for getting us in contact! And yes, these questions I guess were more for city staff (if appropriate?) 1. After public comment on 4/1, many asked the city if it could be "creative" with solutions for Bang the Drum. Are creative solutions a possibility under safety policies? 2. Many criticized that Bang the Drum could stay in the building longer and that the owners would only receive fees. Why is this? Are there other solutions, considering they technically could stay longer and only receive fees? 5 3. Public commenters also noted this feels like punishment for smaller businesses who take the brunt for unethical larger companies' actions, and that Laurel LLC did not provide sufficient communication to the tenants about the building's condition. Is the city considering changing its policies to allow the city to interact with tenants alongside owners to ensure a situation like this doesn't happen again? Thanks! Libbey On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 2:29 PM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Libbey, I believe you were able to speak with Chief Tuggle this morning, correct? Please send over any additional questions you may have to me, and I will do my best to get you answers before your deadline. Thanks, Whit BCC: Email Council Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager Top 5 Strengths: Activator, Communication, Achiever, Learner, Strategic 6 E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications From: Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 2:06 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media Request: New Times SLO This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi, Following up regarding this request. My deadline is tomorrow at noon. Thanks, Libbey On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 11:50 AM Libbey Hanson <lhanson@newtimesslo.com> wrote: Hi there, I am a reporter with New Times and am working on a story about the businesses at 1150 Laurel Lane being asked to vacate due to the owner's not being in compliance with safety. I know the owner's of Bang the Drum sent a letter to the city requesting it allow them to stay longer. I was hoping to speak with Mayor Stewart about this to see if the city has the ability to grant them more time or, even if that request is allowed. I'm also in touch with Cal Fire, however I wanted to reach out to city officials for a statement. If the mayor isn;t the best source, please direct me to who is. 7 My deadline is Friday at noon if anyone is available to talk before then. Thank you! Libbey 801-837-0481 -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly 8 San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) 9 Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution -- ––––– Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution -- ––––– 10 Libbey Hanson (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0241 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX