Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAB 52 (Aguiar-Curry) Native American Resources - City of SLO - Letter of OPPOSITIONCity of San Luis Obispo, Office of the City Council, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3249, 805.781.7114, slocity.org April 29, 2025 The Honorable Isaac Bryan Chair, Assembly Natural Resources Committee 1020 N Street, Room 164 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Oppose – AB 52 (Aguiar-Curry), Native American Resources Notice of Opposition Dear Assemblymember Bryan, On behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo, I write in opposition to Assembly Bill 52 (Aguiar-Curry), unless it is amended to preserve the integrity of California’s established environmental review framework and also ensure equitable consultation processes with all California Native American Tribes. We deeply respect the cultural and historical contributions of California’s Tribal Nations, including the yak titʸu titʸu yak tiłhini Northern Chumash Tribe, the documented lineal descendants of the lands that include San Luis Obispo. The City of San Luis Obispo has long supported meaningful consultation with Tribes. The proposed amendments to AB52 act to exclude California Tribal Nations with longstanding and irreplaceable knowledge of their ancestral homelands from critical decision-making processes related to Tribal cultural resources and environmental protection. In addition, AB 52 as currently drafted introduces fundamental changes to the CEQA process that would create significant uncertainty for local governments and threaten our ability to deliver critical infrastructure, housing, and environmental protection projects in a timely and transparent manner. Key concerns include: • The amendments as currently written directly contradict the objectives outlined in Executive Orders B-10-11 and N-15-19, which prioritize the protection of Native American cultural heritage and promote meaningful government-to-government consultation for all California Native American Tribes. • The bill’s division between federally and non-federally recognized Tribes arbitrarily prioritizes federally recognized Tribes while relegating non-federally recognized Tribes to a secondary status despite non-federally recognized Tribes’ legitimate connections to and knowledge of their homelands. • Extended and open-ended consultation beyond CEQA's environmental review process, including during planning and construction phases. This undermines CEQA’s purpose of early engagement and could halt projects midstream, even after mitigation measures have been adopted. • Mandatory deference to Tribal governments in determining mitigation and cultural resource protection—regardless of federal recognition status—without providing a framework for reconciling competing stakeholder interests or local agency responsibilities. • Unequal treatment of interested parties by requiring draft environmental documents and technical data to be shared with Tribal governments before any other stakeholders, eroding CEQA’s principles of transparency and public disclosure. • Legal uncertainty and increased litigation risk for public agencies tasked with delivering vital services and state-mandated priorities, such as housing production, renewable energy, and climate-resilient infrastructure. • Unworkable requirements for public land management, including undefined restrictions on the use of public property that could be interpreted to prevent development or access based on claims of religious expression or historical cultural damage—without due process or clear criteria. These provisions conflict with the City’s Legislative Platform, which supports advancing access for Indigenous communities as well as fair and timely environmental review, responsible local decision- making, and the advancement of sustainable, inclusive communities. A balanced solution must be sought that both protects the sovereignty of all California Native American Tribes, regardless of their federal recognition status, and preserves CEQA’s foundational purpose—disclosure, mitigation, and informed decision-making. Sincerely, Erica A. Stewart Mayor City of San Luis Obispo cc: The Honorable Cecilia Aguiar-Curry Members, Assembly Natural Resources Committee Senator John Laird Assemblymember Dawn Addis Dave Mullinex, Cal Cities League of California Cities, cityletters@calcities.org