Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2762-2799RESQ�UTION NO. 2799,-(1975 S e r e3 A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That a- -new account be added to the Capital Outlay budget numbered 50 -40 -7062 - 727 entitled Santa Rosa. Sewer Line in the amount of $15, 500.00.. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 19th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: C� RESOLUTION NO. 2798 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO LA FIESTA ASSOCATION FOR ITS EFFORTS IN STAGING THE 1975 LA FIESTA CELEBRATION. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: That this Council hereby congratulates El Presidente and Members of the Board of Directors of La Fiesta 1975 for a magnificent community celebration enjoyed by all the residents and visitors in the City of San Luis Obispo. The Saturday morning parade was one of the finest presented in the City of San Luis Obispo and was.enjoyed by thousands of visitors to the City. The street musicians and the activities at Mission Plaza and the Veterans' Building were excellent. The City Council appreciates the job well done by La Fiesta 1975. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, ;seconded by Councilman Petterson, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES:. None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 19th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: ty erk R 2798 I RESOLL' ^'ON NO. 2797 (1915 Seri ^i A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the C ity of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That $5,000.00 be added to Account No. 55 -40- 6361 -625. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 19th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: J3 �7y7 RESOLUTION NO. 2796 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by'the C ouncil of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That a new account be added to the Utility Tax Budget No. 05 -14 - 7552 -000 entitled 'Bus Radio Equipment" in the amount of $2,300.00. On motion of Councilman Petterson; seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 19th day of May, .1975. ATTEST: ,A D79G 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2795 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That Account No. 50 -01- 4721 -469 be added in the amount of $4,596.00 to take care of inspection.fees on Tract 467, Unit 2.. 2. That Account No. 05 -01- 3999 -000 be decreased by $4, 596. 00. 3. That Account No. 50- 23- 4873 -A09, be increased by $20, 000.00. 4. That Account -No. 50 -23- 4871 -000 be decreased by $20,000.00. 5. That a new account be added to the Parking Fund Budget numbered 50 -51 -6853 -000 and entitled "Parking Lot Trash Containers in the amount of $2,000.00. 6. That $1,800.00 be added to Account No. 60 -11 -5712 -209. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 19th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: /IiiAMM rM A ) 2 9 .s C RESOLUTION NO. 2794 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES FOR CITY PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS FOR THE YEAR.JULY 1, 1975 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1976, AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION THEREOF. WHEREAS, California, Labor Code Section 1773.2 requires that the City before awarding any contract for public works or otherwise undertaking any public works shall specify in each call for bids the general rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of workman needed to execute the contract or shall publish once a year the City's determination therefor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT'RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. This Council hereby ascertains and determines that said wages as of May 19, 1975, shall be as specified upon Exhibit "A" Wage Rate Scale attached hereto, and said Council hereby adopts said scale of wages for all public works contracts. 2. Copies of said Exhibit "A" shall be maintained on file in the Office of Community Development and in the Office of the City Clerk and shall be made available to any interested party upon request. 3. The City Clerk shall cause this resolution together with Exhibit "A" to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City and each department ad- ministering public works contracts shall cause a copy of said Exhibit "A" to be posted at each job site. R 2794 Resolution No. 2.794 2 (1975 Series) On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Norris; and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson, and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 19th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: Y k _ . CITY-OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA i In accordance with the prov-rs i ons of Labor Code Section 177�-.Z, the City of San Luis Obispo hereby publishes on an annual basis its determination of the prevailing rate of wages, The City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California has ascertained and determined the general prevailing rate of wages and the general prevailing rate of wages for holidays and overtime work in the City of San .Luis Obispo for each craft, classification or type of workman to be employed on any public works to be performed in the City of San Luis Obispo, under contracts hereafter awarded by the City Council, to be as follows;___ Health & Welfare Vacation,.P-ensior Basic Apprentice train. Classification _ Wage & Ind. Fund CARPPN1TPQ - - - - - Carpenter $ 8.53 $ 2.99 Carpenter, Foreman 9.28 2.99 IRON WORKER Ironworker, reinforcing, structural, ornamental 9.78 .3.285 Ironworker Foreman reinforcing, structural, ornamental 10.78 3:285 PLUMBER Plumber, Journeyman 10.24 3.9936 Plumber, Foreman 11.264 4.39296 ELECTRICAL WORKERS Wireman, Journeyman 9.53 2.713 Wireman, Foreman 10.48 2.808 CEMENT MASONS Cement Mason, Journeyman 8.11 3.15 Cement Mason, Floating & Troweling Machine Operator 8.36 3.15 Cement Mason, Foreman 8.86 3.15 LABORERS Asphalt Raker and Ironer 6.93 2.68 Asphalt Shoveler 6.72 2.68 Concrete Sawman 6.93 2.68 Cribber, Shorer 7.13 2.68 Fine Grader 6.72. 2:68 Flagman 6.62 2:68 Gas, Oil, and /or Water Pipeline Laborer 6.62 2.68 Guinea Chaser 6.80 2.68 Jetting and Water Blasting 6.62 2.68 Laborer, General or Construction 6.62 2.68 Operator of Pneumatic, Electric, Gas Tools 6.93 2.68 Pipelayer 7.13 2.68 Pipelayei' Back -up Man 6.91 2.68 Powerbroom Sweeper (small) 6.83 2.68 Prefabricated Manhole Installer 7.13 2.68 Rip -Rap Stone,Paver, Placing Stone or wet Sacked Concrete 6.81 2.68 _ Tamper, Barco, Wacker, Etc. 6.93 2.68 Tarman and Mortar Man 6.67 2.68 OPERATING ENGINEERS Group I .- - 8.13 2.89 Group 2 8.39 2.89, Group 3 8.64 2.89 Group 4 8.76 2,89 Group 5 8.96 2.89 Group 6 9.06 2.89 Group 7 9.17 2.89 Group 8 9.32 2.89 Group 9 9.43 2.89 EXHIBIT "Arr Health & Welfare r Vacation, Pension Basic Apprentice train. Classification ` _ Wage & Ind. Fund TEAMSTERS A =Frame Driver Bootman Driver of Vehicle or Combination of Vehicles of 2 -axle (includes all vehicles less than six tons) 3 -axle 4 or more axles Driver of oil spreader truck Driver of Transit -mix Truck, 3 yards or more Pipeline and Utility Working Truck Driver Water Truck - 2 axles Water Truck - 3 or more axles Welder Working Truck Driver Overtime not less than 1 -1/2 times the above rates. $ 7.95 $ 2.70 7.43 2.70 7.25 2.70 7.40 2.70 7.65 2.70 7.43 2.70 7.63 2.70 7.58 2.70 7..43 2.70 7.55 2.70 8.20 2.70 7.58 2.70 Sundays and Holidays - not less than 1 -1/2 times the above rates. The holidays upon which such rates shall be paid shall be all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining agreement applicable to the particular craft, classification, or type of workman employed on the project. Properly indentured apprentices may be employed upon such work, and the provisions of the California Labor Code, particularly the provisions thereof relating to wages of apprentices, shall be applicable in the event of such employment. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Date May 194. 19 75 City Clerk EXHIBIT "A'l RESOLUTION NO. 2793 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PHASE TREATMENT WORKS ASSURANCES. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A14 FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS FOR )F PUBLICLY OWNED WASTE WATER AND PROVIDING CERTAIN BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San.Luis Obispo as follows: The Director of Public Services is hereby authorized and directed to'sign and file for and on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo an application for federal assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C., 1251, et seq.) and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive a grant under said Act and a State grant under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and /or 1974.for Phase I - Facility Planning Phase of Waste Water 'treatment Works. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of San Luis Obispo hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned representat -ive to certify that if grants for its project are made pursuant to the aforementioned federal and state statutes, it will comply with all applicable state and federal statutory and regulatory requirements, including but not limited to the Assurances contained in the Federal Grant Application and the State Grant Contract, The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 522 as amended relating to the right of the public to obtain information and records, The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, U.S.C. 470 et seq., as amended, relating to the. preservation.of historic landmarks The,Copeland (Anti- Kickback) Act, 18 U.S.C. 874, 40 U.S.C. 276c and the regulations issued R 2793 Resolution No. 03 2 (1975 Series) thereunder, 29 CFR 3.1 et seq., and The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 327 et seq., and the regulations issued thereunder; provided, however, that the filing of this application and the receipt and use of funds obtained hereunder for the facilities planning phase shall not in any event be construed as requiring the City to provide extra - territorial sewer service. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Patterson, Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 19th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: _ SWRCB REVISED FORM. 5700 -32, 9/74 PAGE 1 0 F S • State Clearinghr Identifier APPLICATION FOR FEWAL ASSISTANCE *, Not ets:igned (FOR CONSTRUC' 'N PROGRAMS) + } 2. Applicant's AF ;ion No. PAh.-I N/A 3. Federal Grantor Agency 4. Applicant Name Environmental Protection Agency Region IX City of San Luis Obispo Organizational Unit - Department Diviision - - N/A Department of.Public Works Administrative Office Street Address —, F. 0. sox N/A P. 0. Box 321 Street Address - P. O. Box City County 100-California-Street San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo City State — Zip Code State Zip Code Snn F-rnn(­i Q41 11 California 93406 5. Descriptive Name of the Project - -- Study of Needed Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements 6. Federal Catalog No. 7. Federal Funding Requested 66.015 ' $48.800 8. Grantee Type State, County, X City, Other (Specify) 9. Type of Application or Request X New Grant, Continuation, Supplement, _ Other Changes (Specify) 10. Type of Assistance X Grant, Loan, Other (Specify) 11. Population Directly Benefiting from the Project 13. Length of Project 32Y150 10 months 12. Congressional District 14. Beginning Date a• - May 1 1975 b. - " 15 -. Date of Application 16.The applicant certifies that to the best of his knowledge and belief the data in'this - application are true and correct, and that he will comply with the attached assurances if he - receives the grant. The applicant agrees that if a grant is awarded on the basis of this application or any - revision -or amendment thereof, it will comply withal applicable statutory provisions and with the applicable terms, . conditions, and procedures of the Environment Protection Agency Chapter 1, ubchapter B) and of the grant agreement. Typed name Title Director of David F. Romero Telephone Number Area Code Number Ext. Public Services _ _ Signature of Authorized Representative 805 543 -4510 For Federal Use Only SWRCB REVISED FORM. 5700 -32, 9/74 PAGE 1 0 F S PART II PROJECT APPROVAL INFORM_ ATION SECTION A Item ].. State Water Resources Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Governing Body Control Board regional, or other priority rating? Priority Rating _ X.___ Yes No Item 2. Does this assistance request require State, . or local Name of Agency or advisory, educational or health clearances? Board Yes X No (Attach Documentation) Item 3. Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review (Attach Comments) in accordance with OMB Circular A -957. X Yes —No Item.4. State Water Resources Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Approving Agency Control Board regional or other planning approval? Date X Yes_No Item 5. Is the proposed project covered by an approved Check one: State ❑ comprehensive plan? Local 0 Regional1 ._Yes —No Location of plan _ EPA Rej?1on IX - - Item 6. Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Name of Federal Installation -- installation? Federal Population benefiting from Project - Yeses —No . Item -7. ' Will the assistance requested be on Federal land' Name of Federal Installation __ or installation? Location of Federal Land - Percent of Project —Yes!--No -- tem 8. - - - Will the assistance requested have an impactor effect See instruction for additional information to be on the environment? provided. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOR� WILL BE PRODUCED -AS PART Yes _No - 6- OF ___ -H-E - --_ PR Item 9. TOJECT. Number of: Has the project for which assistance is requested caused, Individuals - - - - .since January 1, 1971, or will it cause, the displacement Families of any individual, family, business, or farm? Businesses Farms Yes X _No Item 10. Is there other related Federal assistance on this See instructions for additional information to be project previous, pending, or anticipated? provided. Yes X -No PAGE. 2OF5 ,;at 10 PART II ?N- BUDGET INFORMATION — CONS UCTION Aeral Domestic Assistance Catalog No. 66.015 Section A — General Section B — Calculation cnr.F r COST CLASSIFICATION % Eligible TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT REQUIRED REVISION ONLY ADJUSTMENT GRANT AMOUNT 87'/2 %:: 75 %Federal IZ/2% State APPLICANTS AMOUNT 1. Administrative Expenses N/A 2. Land Structures Right-of-way 3. Architectural/Engineering Basic Fees 56,900 8 100 4. Other Architectural /Engineering Fees N/A 5. Construction and Project Improvement Cost N/A 6. Equipment 7. Contingencies N/A 8. Relocation Payments N/A 9. Indirect Costs N/A 0. TOTALS 12.50 65,000 563900 8,100 Section C — Proposed Method of Financing 1. GRANTEESHARE $ a. Securities b. Mortgages c. Appropriations (By Applicant) 82100 d. Bonds e. Tax Levies I. Non Cash (Explain) g. Other (Explain) h. TOTAL — Grantee Share 81100 2. OTHER SHARES a. State 8,100 b. Other C. Federal 48 800 TAL $ 65,000 cnr.F r �r PART IV ASSURANCES The apfil icarn hereby asetre: and certifies that hr will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, including 011ice of Manaipnnu•nt and Budget Circulars Nos. A -87. A -95, and A -102, as they relate to III(! npulication, acceptance and usr. of Federal funds for this federally - assisted project. Also, the applicant gives assurance find ccrolws. with respect to the grant that: . I. It possesses IM. 11 authority to apply for the grant, and to finance and construct the proposed facilities; that a resolu- tion, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or Passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body, 'authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and direct- ing and authorizing .the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. ducting inspections to insure compliance with these specifica. tions by the contractor. 9. It will cause work on the project to be commenced within a reasonable time after receipt of notification from the approving Federal agency that funds have been approved and that the project will be ,prosecuted to completion with reasonable. di I ige nce. 10. It will not dispose of or encumber its title or other interests in the site and facilities during the period of Federal 2. It will comply with the provisions of: Executive Orrfer interest or while the Government holds bonds, whichever is 11296, relating to evaluation of flood hazards. the longer. 3. It will havo sufficient funds available to meet the non - Federal share of the test for construction projects. Sufficient funds will be avadable when construction is completed 10 assure rffrctivr; Operation and maintenance of the facility for the purposes. constructed. 4. It will obtain approval by the appropriate Federal agency of the final working drawings and Specifications before the projeet•is advertised or placed on the market for bidding; that it will construct the project, or cause it to be constructed, to final completion in accordance with the application and approved plans and specifications; that it will submit to the appropriate Federal agency for prior approval changes that alter the costs of the project, use of space. or functional layout; that it will not enter into a construction contract(s) for the project or undertake other activities until the conditions of the construction grant program(s) have been met. 5. It will provide and maintain competent and adequate architectural engineering supervision and inspection at the construction site to insure shat file completer) work conforms with the. approved" plans and specifications; that it will furnish progress reports and such other information as the Federal grantor ayency may requirr..- 6. It will operalr, and maintain the facility in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or pre• scribed by the applicable Federal, State and local agencies for the maintenance and operation of such facilities. 7. It will give the grantor .agency and the Comptroller General through any aulhnri♦ed representative access to and the rigltf to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related 10 the grant. 8. It will nKtuire the facility to he designed to cnmply with the "American Standard Strccifications for Making Buildings and Facilities. Accessible to, and Usable by, the Physically Handicapped," Number A117.1 -1961, as modified (41 CFR 101- 17.703). The applicant will be responsible for con- 11. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88 352) and in accordance with Title. VI of that Act, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race., color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will imme. diately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. If any real property or structure thereon. is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the Applicant, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial. assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits -.. 12. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with "whom they have family, business, . or other ties. 13. It will comply with the requirements of Title II and Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P.L. 91 -646) which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally assisted programs. 14. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal grantor agency concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative require. ments approved in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -102. 15. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political activity of employees. 16. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as they apply to hospital and educational institution employees of State and local governments. PAGE S OF 5 APPLICANTS' STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR CERTI-FICATION REQUIREMENTS T!io City of Sin T,uis Obispo Name of Applicant HEREBY assures that supervisors and operators of its wastewater treatment plant or plants meet or. will meet certification requirements adopted pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 13625) of Division 7 of the.Water Code (Stats.,19-72, Ch. 1315). 7f- Date (signature)' Authorized Representative of Applicant Director of Public .Services 'LIANCL KEPUKT Form Approved 0, (Title VT. Civil R17FRTq Act of 1964 and Scrtion 13, Federal OA1B No. 158 —R0034 _ Water POT n Control Act, As Amended) NOTE: READ_ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVEI',�,t3 BEFORE COMPLETING FORM. I. A. APPLICANT (Nome and State) B. PROJECT NO. City of San Luis.Obispo, California N/A II. IF ENTIRE POPULATION IN THE APPLIC'ANT'S JURISDICTION IS SERVED NOW BY TREATMENT' SYSTEM OR WILL BE UPON COMPLE- TION OF PROPOSED EPA GRANT PROJECT AND ON -GOING ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION, CHECK HERE III. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING ONLY IF ABOVE BLOCK IS NOT CHECKED A. SUBMIT A MAP WHICH DELINEATES THE APPLICANT'S: 1. GEOGRAPHICAL JURISDICTION FOR PROVISION OF TREATMENT SYSTEM SERVICE: ' 2. EXISTING TREATMENT SYSTEM COVERAGE: 3. CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED UNDER EPA GRANT PROJECT AND ANY ON -GOING ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION: 4. AREAS OF PLANNED FUTURE TREATMENT SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION. S. COMPLETE THE TABLE BELOW: 1. PRESENT 2. POPULATION S' ADDITIONAL 4. POPULATION POPULATION CATEGORY POPULATION PRESENTLY POPULATION REMAINING TO BE OF APPLICANT SERVED TO BE SERVED SERVED AFTER THIS BY THIS PROJECT PROJECT IS COMPLETED AMERICAN INDIAN _ CHINESE. FILIPINO. JAPANESE .NEGRO /BLACK - SPANISH DESCENT WHITE OTHER TOTAL. C. GIVE THE SCHEDULE FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION BY WHICH TREATMENT SYSTEM SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL INHABI- TANTS WITHIN. APPLICANT'S JURISDICTION. D. IS ANOTHER FEDERAL AGENCY BEING ASKED TO PROVIDE. FIN ANCIAL. ASSISTANCE TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT? YES ONO 1. IF 'YES' LIST THE OTHER FEDERAL AGENCY(S) - 2. DESCRIBE THE ASSOCIATED WORK IV• CERTIFICATION I certify that the information given above true and correct to the bent of my knowledge or belief. (A willfully false statement is plm lxhn Alc by Im1�U. s. Code, Tirlc /R, Se a ction IOOf) A,. SIGN ATtJ$E -QFAUTHORIZED OF FI CIAL7 TITLE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL' - C.•DATE Diractor of Public ServirPS _ FOR U.S.' ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY _ DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS - - T APPROVED DISAPPROVED crw rarntq,vw.a t4. /4) REPLACES EPA FORM FWPCA.TIZS (8•e7) WHICH 15 OBSOLETE WGENERAL ..�.. riatioTnlatl' e VI of the Civil Rights Act, ;1964 provides that no person in the United ,tes shall, on the ground of race, color,. o,\ ori gin, be excluded from participation .in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act goes on to explain that the title shall not be construed to authorize action with respect to any employment practice of.any employer, employment agency, or labor organization (except where the primary obj.ec-. rive of the Federal financial assistance into provide employment). . Section 13 of the 1972 Amendments to the Federal, Water Pollution Control Act provides that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance. under the Federal Water Pollution Control. Act, as amended. The primary purpose of the treatment works construction grant program under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, is development of water pollution control facilities.. Accordingly,. the information on this form is required to enable the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency to determine whether prospective treatment works construction grantees are developing treatment system projects on a nondiscriminatory basis as required by the above referenced statutes. Submit the original and two copies of this form. (It a map is required, each form must have a map attached.) If an item cannot be answered or does not appear to be related or relevant to the project for which assistance is requested, write 'NA" for "not applicable." . ITEMS I. Self- explanatory. II. 'Jurisdiction" means the geographical area over which. Applicant has authority and duty to provide treatment works service. "Treatment system" embraces 'all elements which provide for treatment of sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature, including sewage collection lines.. An individual "treatment system," therefore, would begin upstream with collector sewers transporting wastewater from the service areas, and would include all downstream wastewater components involved in the transport and treatment of the wastewater to ultimate disposal of the treated water and sludge residue. "Treatment works" is the term set forth in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, and refers to treatment projects eligible for con- struction grants assistance. It is defined by the statute as any devices and systems used in the storage, treatment, recycl- ing, and reclamation of municipal sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature necessary to recycle or reuse water at the most economical cost over the estimated life of the works, including intercepting . sewers, outfall sewers, sewage collection systems, pumping, power, and other equipment and their appurtenances; extensions, improvements, remodeling, additions, and alterations thereof: and any elements essential to provision of a reliable recycled water supply such as standby treatment units and clear well facilities. A "treatment system"* is the whole, of which "treatment works" are component parts, 'EPA grant.project" is the project described by the application of which this form is a part. "On -going associated construction" is work not included in EPA grant project but which is being or will.be constructed at the same time and is of such character as to be .generally classified as connected or united with the work comprising the EPA project. For an affirmative answer to this question, the Applicant must be providing or be about to provide necessary and appropriate treatment service to all its inhabitants- III.A. The map required by this question must be legible and large enough to contain all the information required by the question. 1' Show the boundaries of Applicant's jurisdiction for provision of treatment system service. 2 Show the area provided treatment system service by shading or distinctive coloring. 3 Mark out the area covered by EPA grant project application of which this form is a part and any associated construction. 4 Mark out the areas of planned future construction and identify by shading or distinctive coloring. IIL B. Give population of Applicant's treatment system . jurisdiction, broken out by categories as specified. The totals of 2, 3 and 4 should equal the total shown under 1. IIII.C.,D. Self - explanatory. Iv.� Self- explanatory. EPA Form 4700 -4 (4_74) UNI II:' I A I ENVIRONMENTAL L J Y., ENTALFROTECTION AGENCY r ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE' _ -' FOR J TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AND SECTION 13 OF THE FWPCA AMENDMENTS OF 1972 NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT /RECIPIENT (Herein /ter GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER GRANT AMOUNT called ASSUROR) (To be completed by EPA) REQUESTED City of San Luis Obispo x482800 Post Office BOX 321 TYPE OFGRANT San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 ❑OEMONST RATION IRI RESEARCH DI RAINING 90THF R (Specify): 'S t lu 1 CHECK ONE: Attention: David F. Romero KNEW LiCONTINUATION 1113REBY AGRFE;S THAT IT will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 W.I,..88-352) and all requirements of file U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Ifereingf1er rq!!r(l "PYA') issued pursuant to that title, to the end that in accordance ss'ith Title VI of that Act, no person in the United Stales shall, nn: the ground of race, color. or. national origin he excluded from participation in, be denied the henefils of, ur be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity fur which tike Assuror receives financial assistance from EPA and hereby gives assurance (flat it will now and hereafter take all.nccessary measures to effecthiatc this agreement. IIIiREBY AGREES THAT IT will comply with all applicable requirements of Section 13 of' the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92.500) athd all requirements of EPA issued pursuant to that section, to the end Thal in accordance Willi that section of that Act," no person in the United States shall, on. the ground of sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits cif, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination udder ally program or activity under the said Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments for which the Assuror receives financial assistance from EPA and hereby gives assurance that it will now and hereafter. take all necessary measures to effectuate this agreement. If any :c r property or structure Ilacreon is provided or improved With the aid (if financial assistance extended to the Assuror by EPA, this Assurance obligates the Assuror, or, in the case of any transfer of such property, any translcree for the period during Which the real property or structure. is used for a purpose involving the provisiiiaas of similar services or. benefits. If any personal properly is so provided, this Assurance obligates the Assuror for file period during which it ret:linS ownership or possession of the property. In all other cases, this Assurance obligates the Assuror for the period during which tlhe financial assistance is c'xiended to it by EPA. THE ASSURANCE is given in consideration. of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, properly discounts or other financial assistance' extended after the date hereof to the Assuror by EPA iahcluding installment payments after such date on account of arrangements for Federal linancia assistance. which were approved before such (late. The 4ssuioi recognizes and agrees that such Federate "financial :assistance will he extended in reliance on the representations ;and Igreemculs made in this ANsmance ;md Ilia( the United States shall reserve the right to seek judicial enforcementof this Assurance. Ihis Assurance is binding oii the Assuror, its successors, transferees, and assignees; and the person or persons whose signature .appear below are authorized to sigh this Assurance on behalf of the Assuror. the obligations assumed by the Assuror hereunder are in addition to ;my obligations Which may be imposed on tire Assuror by any applicable regulation now outstanding or which may hereafter be adopted by EPA" to effectuate any, provision or goal of the said Title VI and all applicable requirements of the said Section 13', and no part of this Assurance shall be read so as to in any way detract from or modify any obligation which maybe imposed on the Assuror by any such regulation standing alone." SIGNATURE OF ASSUROR BY PRES IDENT, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OR COMPARABLE AUTHORIZED DATE OFFICIAL i- EPA Form 4700 -1 (Ro.. 6 -74) ' PRE �101JS [OITION'15 0050LETE , Step I or Step II STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS (Prepared in Compliance with Section 2123(c), California Administrative Code, Title 23, Waters, Chapter 3, Sub- Chapter 7) I hereby certify that the City of San Luis Obispo (municipality shall provide funds as detailed hereon for the construction of wastewater treatment planr.,improvements (name of description of project for which I, as the authorized representative of the above named Municipality, have filed an application for a Clean water Grant pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act .(33 U.S.C. 1151 et. seq.) and the California Clean Water, Bond Law of 1970 and /or 1974 (water Code, Division 7, Chapter 13 and 14). Source of Funds G.O. Bond Issue authorized by =% "yes" vote in the total amount of S on date Revenue Rond TssLie authorized by "yes" vote in the total amount- of S on • date Cash Reserves now on deposit.. Accounts Receivable* By (date of expected first contract award).- Short Term Loans or Notes.* Other* TOTAL Amount for this Proiect S S S 65,000 S S 65,000 *Attach sheet showing details of legal. authorization (cite appropriate code or other legal references, etc.), exact source of funds and time ,of expected receipt, and (in the case of liabilities:) the security provided by the Municipality, "Total Dollar Amount Required," (as estimated on Federal application form EPA 5700 -32, page 4, section B) Cash -flow ration A x 100 = 100 $65,000 B If percentage is less than 100% attach detailed cash -flow analysis showing all expected cash outlay requirements and how they will be met by funds of municipality or grant receipts from State and Federal government or other. Show source of all receipts. Applicant needs 100% of Grant Amount or a detailed cash -flow analysis. Payment will be made only after all tasks are completed and approved unless payment for specific tasks is approved in the certified letter. Signature of Representative (Same as EPA Form 5700 -32) -- C'` Date N' �r .3, Y., 1 F .f . YV.'+ °. pivc 4C ' dJ , s tiC PLAN OF STUDY CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AREAWIDE FACILITIES PLAN CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER GRANT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 1215 F. Y. 1975 - 76 JENKS It ADADISON Consulting Sanitary $ Civil Engineers 543 Byron Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 Uoscription of the Study Area The study area includes the entire City of San Luis Obispo and the adjacent campus of the California Polytechnic State University. Also to be consider- ed are adjacent unincorporated areas to the north, south and west, which are located within the same watershed as the City. San Luis Obispo lies less than ten miles from the Pacific Ocean in the south - central California coastal region. It is nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles, on U. S. Highway 101. Surrounded on most sides by low peaks, the City is situated in a valley along the San Luis Obispo Creek. As the County seat and largest city of San Luis Obispo County, San Luis Obispo contains one quarter of the total County.population. The wastewater treatment plant is in the southwest corner of the City and the effluent is discharged to nearby San Luis Obispo Creek. The most recent treatment plant enlargements were made subsequent to a February, 1961 report by Jenks and Jenks, consulting sanitary engineers. A map of the study area follows. Quality Problem To Be Corrected In general, the water quality problem to be corrected relates to the impact Of the present secondary effluent.on San Luis Obispo Creek. However, there is a conflict relating to the definition of the specific objective of the present study. The conflict is between two points of view. One is that there should be no discharge of wastewater effluents to San Luis Obispo Creek during most of the year. The other point of view is that an adequately treated effluent. should be discharged to the creek. The first point of view was expressed in the proposed NPDES permit of December 24, 1974. In it, the Central Coast Region Water Quality Control Board states that "Effective April 1, 1979, any discharge of wastewater into San Luis Obispo Creek or its tributaries is prohibited, during the months of April through November." Furthermore, the proposed permit included strict effluent limitations requiring filtration (or an equivalent process) and dechlorination. It would also be necessary to evaluate the effluent to determine if control measures would be necessary to meet a. series of mineral effluent limitations. The opposing point of view is found in the "Water Quality Control Plan - Central Coastal Basin ", ( "Basin Plan "), which was published in May 1974. The Basin Plan states that "It is recommended that the City of San Luis Obispo stave upgrading of its wastewater treatment plant to provide level VI treat- ment (including nutrient removal, effluent filtration, disinfection to an PIPN of 2.2 per 100 ml, and dechlorination); a less acceptable option is to cease dry season discharge and retain wastewater on land by 1977." An important part of the present study for an areawide facilities plan will be to evaluate the relative impact on San Luis Obispo Creek of the various treatment /disposal options.' this, end, it will be necessary to obtain sufficient data on the water quality of the present effluent and the creek. II Disposal Alternatives A. Ocean disposal of secondary effluent B. Land disposal (irrigation) of secondary effluent C. Disposal to Laguna Lake after additional treatment D. Disposal to SLO Creek after additional treatment E. No action $3,000,000 0 to 4,000,000 200,000 + treatment cost 0 +.treatment cost _0 - . nt /Disposal Alternatives and Preliminary Costs I. Treatment Alternatives A. Filtration, dechlorination $ 900,000 B. Line treatment,.filtration, dechlorination 1,7001000 C.' Lime treatment, ammonia stripping, filtration, dechlorination 2,2000000 D. Nitrification, filtration, dechlorination 11900,000 E. Nitrification, phosphorus precipitation, dechlorination 12400,000 F. Spray irrigation 31000,000 G. No.action _p_ II Disposal Alternatives A. Ocean disposal of secondary effluent B. Land disposal (irrigation) of secondary effluent C. Disposal to Laguna Lake after additional treatment D. Disposal to SLO Creek after additional treatment E. No action $3,000,000 0 to 4,000,000 200,000 + treatment cost 0 +.treatment cost _0 - . Schedule 1975 1976 • Al J J A S 0 N D J F M A r Data collection Establish objectives F+ ; 3. Analysis of alternatives J. Environmental Impact Report i 5. Infiltration /inflow analysis 6. Financial plan _ 7. Revenue program S. State /Federal review Cost: Entire project cost = $65,000 in accordance with fixed -price contract with Jenks $ Adamson, Engineers ��- ",, %✓B.t Ge13y In establishing objectives because of disagreement between XMS permit and Basin Plan. fc; 2. New regulations from EPA /SWRCB. 3. Difficulty in obtaining adequate infiltration /inflow data. • T. 4. Difficult y in obtaining adequate receiving water quality data. ,r a 5. Disagreements in respect to local growth policies. ,I\ .;:, L 6. Costs Incurred Date There are no costs incurred to date which may be eligible for grant funding. All of the costs to the City are included in the single lump sum contract with Jonks & Adamson,.Engineers. Jenks & Adamson will be responsible for hiring a consultant for the Environmental Impact Report. �4 7. Agreements Attached is a copy of a proposal from Jenks & Adamson for engineering services, including the preparation of the Step 1 report. The actual agree- ment for the proposed work is forthcoming and will be very simi.lar to the proposal. The contract for the Environmental Impact Report will be admin- istered by the engineering consultant and not the City,of San Luis Obispo. Jenks & Adamson 543 Byron'Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 (415) 326 -2570 Contact: Howard L. Hoffman or John H. Jenks 8. Environmental Inrratt k. 'r Probable negative environmental impacts: 1. Increased consumption of electrical energy 2. increased consumption of chemicals 3. Reduction of flow in SLO Creek (if discharge to Creek is prohibited) Probable positive environmental impacts: 1. Improved water quality of SLO Creek The potential for greatest controversy relates to community growth issues. The possibility of providing.sewer service beyond the City limits may be particularly controversial. No adverse impacts on historic sites are anticipated. 9. Previous Grants + On August. 13, 1962,_the U. S. Public Health Service offered a grant of $250,000 to the City of San Luis Obispo for enlargements of the sewage treatment plant. The grant number was IVPC- CAL -122. r3ENKS 4 AMOMSON 543 BYRON STREET'- PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301 - (4151 326 -2570 p March 6, 1975 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of San Luis Obispo City Hall 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Jn P BLAI NE: L HARRISON. P.E. BRUCE M. WYCKOFF, P.E. i OEUEL A. DATSFORO, P.E. �_- '. iRICHARD E. DOW O, P.E. RAYMOND C. ERICKSON I FRANK R. REYNOLDS 1 PAUL L. ADAMSO N, P.E. FP,EOERIC M.ZUMWALT I SPECI A L CONS ULTANTS Subject: PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES Wastewater Treatment, Disposal & Reclamation Facilities Improvements Program Gentlemen: In accordance with our understanding of your wishes in this matter, we hereby offer to continue our consulting engineering services to the City by the providing of studies, reports, design and construction management for needed Wastewater Treatment, Disposal and Reclamation Facilities Improvements.. Essentially, the proposed services will encompass steps required specifically to define and to implement an initial improvements Project consistent with a Program needed to meet the requirements of Order No. 75 -13 of the Regional liater Quality Control Board (National Discharge Elimination System - NPDES - No. CAO049224), as adopted on the date of February 14, 1975. In addition, the Program is to be consistent with meeting of approved planning and water quality objectives of the "Mater Quality Control Plan - Central Coastal Basin (3)" of the State Water Resources Control Board. And, the Program is to be consistent with the best interests of the City of San Luis Obispo in consideration of the combined factors involved. Further, the Program is to be developed and implemented in such a way as to insure maximum State and Federal grant participation in project(s) funding. We propose to provide our services, consistent with the above and also all applicable State and Federal Clean Mater Grant regulations, in PHASES, each of which is to be authorized in advance by the City prior to commencement. The PHASES are itemized as follows: P.1, ',SE I: Facilities Plannin The intent of this PHASE of engineering services is to provide preliminary studies and reports necessary to define in detail a recommended long -range Wastewater Treatment, Disposal and Reclamation Facilities Improvements Pro- gram, including an initial improvements Project to meet State and Federal ;rater pollution control and planning objectives, and as required, to fulfill State and Federal Facilities Planning requirements prerequisite to State and Federal grant approvals. City of San Luis Obispo March 6, 1975 1. Prepare a Study Plan, including all related information required by the State l•later Resources Control Board prerequisite to Study Plan and State. and Federal grant approvals. 2. Define and evaluate viable Alternatives for, (1) treated wastewater dis- posal, (2) wastewater treatment., and 3) wastewater reclamation for beneficial reuse.consistent with meeting of stipulated Program.objectives. 3. Prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as required to meet local, State and Federal requirements as.prerequisite to Clean Water Grant 'approvals,_as well as to meet local /regional legal requirements for facil- ity improvements construction. It is understood that vie may elect to utilize outside consultants and specialized experts, as approved by the City, as part of the EIR preparation and at,.no additional cost to the City. Assist the City in procedural matters pertinent to EIR hearings. 4.. Prepare a Project Report as required under Article 5 of the California Administrative Code at Title 23, Chapter 3, Subchapter 7, as amended to date. The Project Report will include and summarize all required addi- tional studies, including the Revenue Prooram and Financing Plan, con- sistent with the Guidelines provided by the State lrlater Resources Control Board, including the following subject areas: I: Ihtroduction II. Existing & Projected Project Planning Area Characteristics III. Existing & Projected Institutions with Project Planning Area IV: Analysis of Existing Wastewater.Facilities• V. Project ,alternative Analysis VI. Summary Comparison of Project Alternatives VII. Recommended Project VIIi. Operation and Naintenance IX. Financial Plan X. Revenue Program 5. Prepare and provide an .Infiltration /Inflo:ii Analysis of the City's sewer- age system to meet Federal Environmental Protection Agency and State Water.Resources Control Board requirements. 6. Provide additional services, follo:•iin- preparation of the Project Report and Environmental Impact Report, in connection with the State and Federal project review process, including A -95 (State Clearinghouse), Environ- mental Impact Report pub Iic. hearing and final Report preparation, State Water Resources Control Board Staff" review; Federal Environmental Protection lyency Staff rovie',•i; and preparation of all necessary applica- tions for State and Federal grants. 7. Written reports viill be furnished to the City in the follo�;Iing quantities: EIR - .Draft - 200 copies EIR —Final - 100 copies Project Report - 150 copies Infiltration /lnflo�a Analysis - 50 copies I City of San Luis Obispo -3- �f. March 6, 1975 ^;1.1SE II -A: Preparation.o_f Construction Drawings, Specifications, a and 0. & H; Manual 1. Perform preliminary review, reconnaissance and investigations to dater- mine specific scope., requirements and final physical layout of the approved initial improvements Project. 2. Assist the City in the final processing of the applicable Federal and State Clean Water Grant documents.' . 3. Design the initial improvements Project, and prepare plans and specifi- cations for the construction project; furnish one hundred fifty .(150) sets of the specifications and contract documents, and ten.(10) sets of prints of the full -size drawings; deliver the final tracings of the plans to the City upon completion of the work. 4. Assist the City in the advertising, bidding and -award procedures. 5. Assist the City in the applications for, and the securing of, necessary permits for construction from the govzrnmentai agencies having juris- diction over such matters. 6. Check shop and working drawings of the Contractors for compliance with the plans and specifications. 7.. Prepare and process for approval by the. granting agencies an Operation and 'Maintenance (0. & M.) Manual, covering both existing and new facilities of the .Project. The Manual will be prepared in accordance with the Guidelines of. the State Division of Water Quality Control and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency. . Provide the City 'with fifty (50) copies of the completed 0. & M. Manual. 8. Assist the City in the establishment and implementation of testing and monitoring procedures, and conduct indoctrination sessions as per the requirements of the granting agencies and as coordinated with the City's staff. PHASE II -6: Special Services I. Arrange for and direct project site surveys; as necessary for the design of the Project, and as required for constructinn staking and layout. 2. Arrange for and direct soils and foundation investigations, as may be necessary, for the proper design and construction. of the Project. 3. Prepare plats, descriptions and special exhibits, as necessary, for easem_nts and rights -of -way that may be required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Project. -4- City of San Luis Obispo March 6, 1975 4. Arrange for and direct the—photography, printing and binding of.'half-size reduced project plans, and for the microfilming of the plans, as per requirements of the grant agencies. 5. The performing of any special technical services beyond the scope of this proposal and specifically requested by the City. 61. Provide advice to the City during construction, on specific request by the City. This item to be employed only in the event that the City does not elect to utilize our,experienced professional services under PHASE II_I below. PHASE III: Field Engineering and Construction Grant. Management 1. Arrange for.and conduct pre- construction conferences, and maintain con- stant liaison between the City and the grant agencies, the low -bid contractor, and the various participants of the program.. 2. Provide qualified field inspection personnel on the job, in sufficient number and expertise: as warranted by the contractors' activities. The field inspection will be under the regular supervision of a principal field representative, and will be in close liaison with the principal design engineers. 3. Arrange for, provide., and direct construction material.s testing, as required. 4. Arrange for, provide., direct, and coordinate.field construction staking, and review cut- sheets. 5. Prepare and assist the City in the processing of construction contract progress payments, contract change orders, and field directives. 6. Main' records on manpower, affirmative action, non- segregation, and other non - financial requirements of the granting agencies.. 7. Assist the City in the scheduling and application for progress payments. on thlo grant(s), and provide up -to -date cash -flow projections on the construction program. B. Maintain an up -to -date set of prints of.the plans-, delineate as -built conditions on the tracings prior to delivery to the City at the com- pletion of the construction project. OVERALL PROJECT h!ANAGE4udT /COORDIP1ATIOi4 The intent of this PHASE of services is to provide the City.viith centralized, overall management of the Improvements Program PHASES of impleno.entation,.a.nd i -5 City of San Luis Obispo March 6, 1975 to coordinate all activities, commissioned services and cooperative efforts necessary for an efficient and continuous progression towards achievement of the Program's objectives. The work involved shall include advising the City as to grant application procedures, follow -up, time schedules, and special reporting; maintaining liaison with the appropriate departmental staffs of the regulating and grant administering agencies; and as.a central communica- tion and information unit for the City on this Program. COOPERATION OF THE CITY It is understood that the City will assist and cooperate with the Engineer on this Program by providing access to the work sites; providing maps, records and 0. & il_ information; serving all notices, holding all hearings and fulfilling legal requirements; advertising and receiving bids for the construction project unit(s); providing title,reports, appraisals and nego- tiation services as may be necessary for the selecting and securing of ease - ments and /or* rights -of -way; and that the City will assist us in determining the location of existing facilities that may be affected by the new con -. struction. It is also understood that the City will conduct negotiations with the California Polytechnic University, for the purposes of making whatever arrangements are necessary for parti'ci,pation in the Program. ACTIVITY PLAN AND TIFIE SCHEDULE Upon receipt of authorization from the City, we propose to proceed diligently with the prosecution of the work in accordance with the "Activity Plan" and "Time Schedule ",attached to this proposal as Exhibits "A" and "B ", respect- ively. It is to be understood that the time schedule for the various items of work must be considered as flexible, due to the dependence of both the City and the Engineer upon the actions (or inaction) of the regulating and grant administering agencies, and that the Activity Plan and the Time Schedule may be periodically revised, due to circumstances beyond the control of the City and /or the Engineer. FEE SCHEDULES A. PHASE. J: For all items of work und-cr PHASE I, our Fee shall be the lump sum of sixty -five thousand dollars ($65,000), payable in progress payments as fol1o;ls: 1. Upon completion of studies defining and evaluating of Program Alternatives, the sum of $20,000. 2 Upon.completion of the EIR, the sum of $15;400. City of San Luis Obispo ! -6- - March 6, 1975 3. Upon completion of the Project Report, including revenue program, financing plan, update of Infiltration /Inflow Analysis,, and sub- mittal of all necessary documents pursuant to A -95 and other State and Federal review procedures, the sum of.$30,000. B. PHASE II -A (Design): For all the work under Items 1 through 6 inclusive of PHASE II -A, the Fee shall be based on the design fee curve tables contained in the 1972 Manual 45 of the American Society of Civil Engi- neers (ASCE). Curve. "A" shall apply. to treatment works design, and Curve "B" shall apply to pipeline design, based upon an approved Engi- neers Estimate of the initial improvements Project construction cost, until the final payment, which shall be based upon actual construction cost. The Fee shall,be payable in four progress payments of 20% each and two payments of 10% each, based on the percentage of work performed, . with an accumulative-total of 90% due upon submittal of the completed plans and specifications to the governmental granting agencies; the final 10% shall be due and payable upon completion of the construction Project. For the work under Items 7 and 8 of PHASE II -A, the Fee shall be a lu:ip sum amount of eighteen thousand five hundred dollars ($18,500), payable in the following manner; two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500). upon delivery of the draft of the manual to the granting agencies (as required at the time of plans submittal); eight thousand dollars ($3,000) upon delivery of the completed manuals, as approved by the granting agencies; and the final eight thousand dollars ($3,000) upon completion .of the indoctrination sessions. C. PHASE LI -B (Soecial Services): For all work under Phase II -B, the Fee will be based on our actual salary costs, times a multiplier of 2.2; plus reimbursement of our direct expenses for outside services at pre- vailing rates, with a 57, mark -up for handling. The Fee shall be pay - able in progress payments based on the actual work performed, as agreed upon by the City staff representatives. The aggregate total amount of the Fee for Items ,I through 4 inclusive of PHASE II -B shall not exceed forty thousand dollars ($40,000) without specific prior approval of the City. D. PHASE III (Field Engineering): For the ,.iork Under PHASE I.II, the Fee s'-alf be equal to t,;io and one -half percent (2.5`.)of th-, construction cost of the initial improve!aents Project, priyalble in !sonthly install - ments through the construction period. Construction staking and materials testing costs during construction shall be considered as included in the percentage fee for this PHASE, and no additional compensation will be requested or paid therefor.. i -6- City of San Luis Obispo March 6, 1.975 E. Overall Project i;anaoement: Inasmuch as the work involved with the overall project management and coordination is so closely related to, and dependent upon, the various PHASES of the engineering services, cost allowance for management and coordination has been made in the above Fee Schedul_es,.and.no additional compensation will be. requested or paid therefor. TERMINATION The City may terminate or abandon the initial improvements Project, or any project or part.of it, by oritten notice to this.office; ho,rjever, in such an event, we will be entitled to compensation for all authorized, unpaid work and exp -anses accrued to the date of receipt of notification of termina- tion or abandonment. Ue will be pleased to meet with City Staff.at any convenient time to.discuss details or answer questions pertinent to this proposal and the proposed Pro_ gram development and implementation. We look forward to continuing our work with the City, which no, :j extends from the year 1941. Very truly yours, JENKS & ADAMSON 6hn H. Jvs President Blaine L. Harrison Executive Vice President JHJ /BLH /jmk CITY OF SAN LUIS OE313PCO WASTEWA-fER ATMENT, DISPOSAL & P,ECL j.AT(ON FACILITIES . IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AC'T'IVITY PLAN j ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCIAL INFILTRATION LJPACT REPORT REPORT ANALYSIS ©ASIN POSSIBLE j I PLAN COORDINATION J EXCESSIVE � REPORT - EFFORTS n INFILTRATION r i N SEWER t EVALUATION PUBLIC SURVEY HEARING w \W N \Q a — LOCAL. PROJECT AGENCY REPORT APPROVALS T BY MARCH 11976. j CONCEPT APPROVAL U m (BY STATE S FEDERAL AGENCIES ) z z d J a J ' Q DESIGN ELECTION CI W N x a . GRANT . T - CERTIFICATION JANUARY L197d j ( BY STATE 8 FEDERAL AGENCIES) w� rc <r xm n 2. $ CONSTRUCTION ' T BY APRIL. 1, 19T9 d s. o' < START -UP C W 1 O n. - - MEETING ALL REO'JIREMENTS 7 CITY OF 5AN LUIS 0,00 WASTEWATER TREATif�J, DISPOSAL $ RECLA?tATIO FACIj JIGS IMPROVEMENTS PROGRA%i .: LLr_t TINE SCHEDULE FOR DEVELOPINENT OF PROGRA`,1 AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INITIAL IMPROVEXENTS PROJECT •`t 1) Hire Consulting Engineer and commence Facilities Planning, including defining and evaluation of Alternatives, Project Report, Revenue Program, Financing Plan arid. Infiltration /Inflow Analysis, by April 1, 1975 2) Prepare Study Plan and related information and submit to State hater Resources Control Board for approval, together faith Step 1 (Facilities Planning) grant application, by May 1, 1975 3) Hire Consultant to prepare Environmental Impact Report, receive Study Plan and Step 1 grant approval.., and commence Facilities Planning, by.. July 1, 1975 4) Complete studies to define Alternatives and eval- uation of Alternatives, complete draft Environ- mental Impact Report, hold public hearings, by December 11 1975 5) Complete. Facilities Planning, including Project Report, final Environmental Im,.pact Report, Revenue Program, Financing Plan and Infiltration/ inflow Analysis, submit for City approval, submit to State 1Uater Resources Control Board for approval, by ;larch 1, 1976 6) Receive.concept approval of Project from State Water Resources Control Board and Federal Environmental Protection Agency, authorize.final engineering, by August. Is 1976 7) Complete final engineering., financing arrangements, submit to State Water Resources Control Board and .Federal Environmental Protection Agency for final review and approval, by June 1, 1977. 8) Receive State and Federal final approvals and grant certification, authorize advertisement for construc- tion bids, by September 1, 1977 9) Receive constriction bids, submit for State and Federal approvals,.by November 15, 1978 10) Receive State, Federal and City approvals, award construction contract and commence construction, by January 1, 1979 11) Complete initial improvements Project construction, by April 1, 1979 CAIJOOR` NIA CLEAN WATER GRANT FA&GRAM \' KEY ACTION QUESTIONNAIRE, 1. Applicant Agency: City of San Luis Obispo (Name /Address) : Post Office Box 321 San. Luis Obispo, CA 94306 Authorized Representative: David F. Romero (Name /Address) Director of Public Sarv; s 2,. Key Applicant Agency contact (Name /Title) : David F R�marn Director of Public Services Phone number: 805 - 543 -4510 3. Priority. Class: Step .1 F.Y. 1975 - 76 4. Regional Board Central Coast Basin Area Central Coastal (3) 5. Political Representatives: U.S. Congressman: Burt L. Talcott State Senator: Donald L. Grunsky State Assemblyman: Robert P. Nimmo S. Does your Agency intend to diligently implement a Clean Water Project and file a Project Report for a Clean Water Grant? X Yes No Explain,a "no" answer.. 9. Have you engaged a consultant to conduct engineering investigations and complete a Project Report? X Yes No 10. Have you engaged an environmental.consultant to conduct environmental impact studies? _Yes No I1•. Have you engaged a consultant to prepare a financial plan? X Yes No Have you engagt a consultant to prepare aorvenue Program? /134 _Yes No Uo you anticipate that your project will involve consolidation with other communities? _Yes �No 4. Have you, . or do you intend to, contact local industries, agri- cultural water users, or others regarding the possibility of using reclaimed wastewater? --.�-Yes No Explain: 15. It.will..likely be three years or more before your new facilities are in operation. Have you asked your engineers to investigate operational or low cost capital improvements at your existing . facilities which would improve the quality of your effluent during. this period? _Yes No Explain a "no" answer: 15. Has an environmental impact analysis of alternative plans been scheduled to yield impact.information to local Agency decision makers prior to selection of a recommended plan? h Yes No 17. Environmental. Impact Reports are subject to intensive review by-ma. . ny agencies. Have you anticipated pitfalls? Example: Air Resources Control Board's concern over direct impacts (plant emissions) and indirect impacts.(surplus capacity sup- porting new growth in a critical air basin such as Los Angeles area) . ' Yes 18. Firm financing of local agency's share of project and firm ability to meet cash flow demands during construction must be demonstrated in detail as soon as possible. Are you taking steps to anticipate cash flow problems and resolva same? X Yes No c Have you developed a schedule for a bond election? _ Yes No Explain a "No" answer: Financing considerations will be determined_.:as_a -part of this study. 20. All dischargers are required by state law to obtain Waste Discharge Requirements. Where the discharge is to surface .waters, NPDES Permits are required under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. Waste discharge requirements issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Boards fulfill all-requirements of the'NPDES permit program. Proposed waste discharge requirements should be developed for each discharge alternative pr -ior to the completion of the Projeca Report: This should. be done.through consultation with the Regional Board and by review of the interim basin plan. Your local Regional Board must certify that the waste discharge require -. ments on the recommended alternative are "current" and "adequate' prior to State certification of the project. Have you contacted. your Regional Board and worked out a schedule to obtain probable Waste Discharge Requirements? Yes No 2L Irrespective of Waste Discharge Requirements, agencies receiving grants are required by Federal regulation to propose a project which provides, as a minimum, secondary.treatment by July 1, 1977, i.e., an effluent limitation at least down.to the following- .levels: . Monthly. Weekly ". Parameter Units Average Average BOD mg /l 30 45 5 Ss mg /l 30 45 Fecal Coliform MPN /100 ml 200 40.0 Hydrogen 'ion concentration pH units 6.0 to 9.0 6.0 to 9.0 Does the project you are proposing meet or terminate in.a treat- ment plant which meets this minimum secondary effluent standard? X Yes . No The .recommended plan must be compatible with the proposed Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan)., Have you received a copy of the proposed Basin Plan for your area and are you coordinating this aspect closely with the Regional Board? . X Yes. No 24- Implementation of.your project will require coordination with the local land'use regional planning agency. Have you commenced or do you maintain a continuing dialogue with staff officials of the regional planning agency covering your area_? X_Yes No 25. What.is the name of, address, phone number, and name of. key official of the regional planning agency covering your area? Name Safi 1ui Obisnn (onnt� GitiF� Aran planning Co Address: Courthouse Annex Room 102 San.Luis Obispo, CA._93401 Official: Ned_Rogaway, Secretary Phone: _ (805). 543 -1550 26• The deadline for submittal of final plans and specifications for F.Y. 1975 -76 and 1976 -77 projects will be indicated in your concept approval,letter. At that time be prepared to estimate the time needed to complete the final plans and specifications. 27- Flow data will be.needed in the Project Report and for the final design to determine existing gpcd, average daily flow ('dry and wet weather), peaking factors, infiltration /inflow, etc: If necessary,, temporary flora measuring devices should 0 0 De installed now to obtain the necessary data required for the ?roject report. Are flows presently being measure, recorded, :tc., at key lc ^.ations in existing systems? _Yes No xplain a "no" answer: 28. Does your wastewater have any unusual characteristics,.either due.to industrial waste -or other factors, or are you faced with exceptionally stringent discharge requirements or both? X Yes. No Explain a "Yes" answer: Exceptionally _ stringent discharge requirements include 90% nutrient removal and dry- iaeather discharge prohibition. If the answer to the above question is yes, are you considering. conducting pilot plant studies? Yes X No. If yes, briefly explain: Note: pilot plant studies.'require prior approval if costs are to be considered eligible for 9. ants. 29. If certain industries make significant waste load contributions to your system, are you working closely with these.industries, keeping them abreast of your studies, and encouraging them to investigate source of control measures and possibly pretreatment? Yes No NA Are you preparing to request letters of intent (refer to Revenue Program Guidelines) from significant industrial users? Yes No NA ID Impleme ntation f many projects often ini es the need for ID permits from other governmental units, StAte Lands permit if crossing tideland areas with a facility, a U.S. Corps of Army Engineers permit, if building an ocean outf all, coordin- ation with Department of Fishand Game concerning proposed projects which will direct., obstruct, or-change natural flow or bed of 'a river, stream or lake (refer to Section 1601 of Fish and Game code), and,coastal commission .permits for projects within 1000 yards of the pacific coast line. Have you scheduled Acquisition of all necessary permits? Yes No NA 30. Where more than one agency is participating in a. project, con- tractual arrangements must be completed prior to concept approval or before approval may be given to proceed with plans and speci fications (Step .2),. Are you pursuing a schedule to accomplish this? Yes No NA publ the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 31. ic Law �91-646 Property Acquisition Policies Act Of 1970 may effect your project. Comprehensive federal regulations implementing.the act were published-in,Title 40; Chapter 1, Subchapter A, Part 4 of Rules and Regulations (see Federal Register, Volume 36,, No. 164 - Tuesday, August 24, 1971). Paragraphs 4.251 through 4.263 deal with Acquisition of Real.Property and outline specific acquisition procedures. Has your legal advisor reviewed these. paragraphs and the act in general and advised you of the impact on your land acquisition program? Yes No NA, 32. You should review the new Clean . Water Grant-Regulations which are contained in the binder titled, "Clean Water. Grant Program Guidelines". I . f you have questions relating to priorities,. n cost effectiveness, infiltration /inflow limitations, etc., please indicate them below: 33. Do you foresee any potential problems with your project,.such as: Problems financing the project, problems complying with the waste discharge requirements at a practicable cost, problems with local support of a project, problems with environmental im- pact or with local environmental concerns, political or insti- tutional problems, problems with local industry, problems in obtaining permits, or problems in complying with the basin plan? _Yes No Explain: We believe that discharge to San Luis Obispo Creek is beneficial during dry - weather and that the NPDES permit should be chanced to-reflect this fact. Signature-of person submitting questionnaire for agency noted: (Signature) Director of Public Services (Title) City of San Luis Obispo (Agency of Firm) 805 -543- 45.10 r/U (Phone) t . (Date) RESOLUTION 140. 2792 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PROHIBITING THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS UPON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY PENDING MEASURES TO PROTECT FUTURE OCCUPANTS THEREOF. WHEREAS, Lots 14 through 21.of Tract 412 bordering. Partridge Drive are subject to potentially hazardous land- slides from unstable soil upon the hillside above; and WHEREAS, this Council has determined that no further construction or occupancy shall be permitted upon Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20 and 21 until protective measures.deter- mined adequate by the City have been taken to eliminate said hazardous conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis. Obispo.as follows: 1. No grading permit and no building permit shall be issued by the City for construction activity upon Lots 14, 15, 16, 17., 19, 20 or 21 of Tract 412 bordering Partridge Drive in the Laguna -Royal portion of the City until the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer certify that the hazardous landslide conditions upon the hillside above will not endanger the health, safety and welfare of users or occupants of said lots. This resolution does not prohibit the issuance of permits for grading, retaining walls, or other activities approved by the City as necessary.for the correction, alleviation, or containment of the landslide conditions. /� J 7.9.7- Resolution No. 2792 2 1975 Series) C 2. The real property directly affected by the prohibitions herein is more specifically described as follows: A portion of Lot '59 of Stratton's Subdivision of Rancho Canada.de Los Osos y La Laguna. Tract 412, Lots 14, 15, 16,. 17, 19, 20 and 21. 3. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder as a document affecting real property. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson, Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 19th day of May, 1975. n ATTEST: RESOLUTION NO. 279.1 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A BUS LOADING ZONE ON LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That a bus loading zone is hereby established on the easterly side of Los Osos Valley Road commencing 160 feet northerly of the westerly prolongation of the northerly property line of Madonna Road and extending 46 feet northerly. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 5th day R 2791 RESOLUTION NO. 2790 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE EMPLOYMENT OF A CONSULTANT TO PREPARE A MASTER PLAN FOR LAGUNA LAKE PARK AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: This Council hereby approves the employment of Wallace, NcHarg, Roberts & Todd (WMRT) to prepare the Laguna Lake Regional Park Master Plan and Open Space Implementation Study. The Mayor is authorized to execute the agreement of employment on behalf of the City. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Norris ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted. this 5th 'day of May, 1975. ATTEST: R 2790 .i RESOLUTION NO. 2789 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A DATA PROCESSING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND AUTHORIZING THE.MAYOR TO SIGN THE SAPS. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the.City.of San Luis Obispo as follows: The Council hereby approves the agreement for services with the County of San Luis Obispo Office of Technical Services whereby the County will provide data processing services for the City. A copy of said agreement together with Exhibit "A" thereof is on file in.the office of the City Clerk: The date of said agreement will be the date that the agreement is signed.by the County of San Luis. Obispo. The Mayor is authorized to execute said agreement. on behalf of the City. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Norris, and on the following roll call vote: AYES:. Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 5th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: C 7 c R 2789 n, RESOLUTION N0. 2.788 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO RESTRICTING PARKING ON MILL STREET; ELIMINATING A LOADING ZONE ON M014TEREY STREET TO ACCOMMODATE METERED PARKING; AND AUTHORIZING PERMANENT CAL POLY DIRECTIONAL SIGNS ON CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That parking is hereby restricted on the southerly side_of Mill Street commencing 216 feet easterly of the northerly prolongation of the easterly property line of Santa Rosa Street and extending 22 feet easterly. 2. That a loading zone is hereby eliminated and a. two -hour parking zone from 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., Sundays and holidays excepted, is, established on the northerly side on Monterey Street commencing 184 feet westerly of the southerly prolongation of the westerly property line of Santa Rosa Street and extending 20 feet westerly. 3. That placement of California State University directional signs on the westerly side of California Boulevard at the intersection of Taft Street and at the intersection of the north bound off -ramp from Highway 101 is hereby authorized On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Norris; and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing Resolution is ppssed and adopted this 5th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: ayo y erk RESOLUTION NO. 2787 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. ! BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That Account No. 55 -50- 6205 -051 be increased in the amount of $8,000.00. 2. That Account No. 55 -50- 6313 -291 be increased in the amount of $5,000.00. . 3. That Account No. '50 -40 -4870 A -27 be added in the amount of $3, 980.27. 4. That Account No. 50 -40- 2580 -912 be increased by $2,000.00. 5. ThatAccount No. 55 -50- 6212 -213 be increased by $11,000.00. 6. That Account No. 85 -01 -4152 -000 be increased by $405.45 and Account No. 85 -01- 4101 -001 be decreased by $405.45. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Norris -, and on the following roll call vote:. AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 5th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: i /� c� ;7j7 RESOLUTION NO. 2786 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That Account No. 50 -40- 7062 -726 (Broad- Rockview pump station) be increased by $16,500.00. 2. That $5, 500.00 be assigned to Select Road Account No. 50 -20 -4871 A22 (Prado Road Storm Drain) . (not included in budget) On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Norris, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 5th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: 2 7 o--6 RESOLUTION NO. 2785 (1975 S.eries) A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That Account No.60 -40- 2580 -909 be increased by $19,000.00. 2. That Account No. 45 -40- 2580 -910 be decreased by $10,000.00. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Gurnee, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee and. Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Norris ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 5th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: s ✓� -RESOLUTION NO. 2784 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION CHANGING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That the changes proposed in the attached chart prepared by Accountant Roberta Goddard be adopted. On motion of Councilman Graham., seconded by Councilman Gurnee, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: FROy= - -- /7 2 7 J-y �l• 0 !n N H 1- W W I N N O Ln Ln 1 U'i U7 O O CL / Fc o rt o m � w to 1 I + v N - 'P 01 zj b7 N p pp ul Ln CD 0) OIQ Fr . W N O UI O I I + P lD U7 In A lD 0\ Lo w g.D (U W (n W \D O w H O O m (n t0 w In 1 O O I d>O?Q O In In O N O N O W R° 3 W F-' F A N' 00 w 0 o W W % N O I O 00 M CiaV) N oom I'D .p 0) O O 01 -C y zD O o 0 o to W _I 0 O O . C. N. 0 I + 1 w a) 00 F, w rn m oro, t✓ N r 00 I H w ri) o• rnm 00 o w ° °o , 1 CD 01% in w o0 o m o W O O, F•� N W N N O O O y y CD n C4- + I I + Q Y xj 0) F w 0 0) w o w c(ynJ O N � W I x . 0 D m m C•� W 0) lD I--' Ln w 0) rn lD �A W l0 J W �I O O .P l0 �A CD F< + I 1 1.0 Ln F� co w U rn D' F� I f ro rn H o J m o ~ -I ,A cn \D rn N• m oo ° m v' m + + I Ln N o N I rn b m' co o� o o ° ono rn N oN CD I 1 + N C) Ln Li 1 10- CIF rn N W H .A I N 01 ~• M . W 0! C + CD CL w . �P �N O U'7 N 00 W N 0) - w I 00 N c+ 0�1 Cl 10 o w o cn w 0 110 H CD 0 J O O J O r E'• Ol r rt, rt ` N O W C F H F, N `N 00 +! N • In H w co 00 N iD r rn to w 0 w Fr o -.D • o io • a o o A. a RESOLUTION NO. 2783 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION CHANGING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That Account No. 05 -01 -3998 -000 be increased by $2, 000, 00. 2. That Account No. 05 -01 -3999 -000 be decreased by $2, 000.00. 3. That Account No. 50 -52- 7112 -213 be increased by $6,000.00. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Gurnee, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: J /j ? 7 P-J 0 O RESOLUTION NO. 2782 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION CHANGING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That Account No. 50 -40 -7162 -72C (Sewer Plant Lab Equipment Capital Outlay) be increased by $4,500.00 and 50- 40- 7162 -72F (Sewer Plant Gates and Valves Account) be decreased by $4, 500.00. On motion of Councilman Norris, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: _'yam %i a 7 cP-,. RESOLUTION NO. 2781 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE 1974 -75 BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That Capital Outlay Account No. 55 -40- 6361 -625 (Broad Street Waterline Project) be added in the amount of $185, 000.00. 2. That Bed Tax Reserve Account No. 60-12-5761-605 be added in the amount of $50,000.00. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Petterson, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: /j�)7J--/ Resolution No. 2780 (1975 .Series) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS.OBISPO APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR 1974 STATE GRANT MONEYS MEADOW PARK PROJECT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the State Beach, Park, Recreational and,Historical Facilities Bond Act of 1974, which provides funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and for developing facilities for public outdoor recreat4on and historical purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications prior to submission of said applications to the state; and WHEREAS, said.applications contain assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, said procedures further require the applicant to possess an adopted plan showingperks and recreation lands and facilities, existing and proposed; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan was first adopted by the City Council on January 15, 1973; and WHEREAS, the proposed Meadow Park project appears on the city's plan, is consistent with the California Outdoor Recreation Resources Plan, and is In conformity with the State Environmental Goals and Policy Report;.and WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby: 1. Approves the filing of an application for 1974 state grant assistance; and 2. Certifies that said agency . understands the assurances in the appli- cation; and 3. Certifies that said agency has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and /1? Z? 7 t Resolution No. 2780 (1975 Series) APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR 1974 STATE GRANT MONEYS MEADOW PARK PROJECT. 4. Certifies that said agency meets the planning requirements and that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and 5. Appoints the Director of Parks & Recreation as agent of the city to conduct all.negotiations, execute and submit all documents including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and so on which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project; and 6. The Mayor of the City of San Luis Obispo is hereby authorized and directed to execute five copies of said project agreement; and 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this resolution by the Council. ON MOTION of Councilman Gurnee , seconded by Councilman Graham , and on the following roll call vote: AYES:. Councilmen Graham, Gurnee,, Norris, Petterson, and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was duly p April, 1975. ATTEST: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed by the Council of the City of San. Luis Obispo at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of April, 1975. ty `CITrk 1 Resolution No. 2779 (1975 Series) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR 1974 STATE GRANT MONEYS MITCHELL PARK PROJECT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the State Beach, Park, Recreational and Historical Facilities Bond Act of 1974, which provides funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and for developing facilities for public outdoor recreation and historical purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS., said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the.approval of applications prior to submission of said applications to the state; and WHEREAS, said applications contain assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, said procedures further require the applicant to possess an adopted plan showing parks and recreation lands and facilities, existing and proposed; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan was first adopted by the City Council on January '15, 1973; and WHEREAS, the proposed Mitchell Park project appears on the city's plan, is consistent with the California Outdoor Recreation Resources Plan, and is in conformity with the State Environmental Goals and Policy Report; and WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby: 1. Approves the filing of an application for 1974 state grant assistance; and 1. Cori I f In f in t- •;n I iI nrinnry undnrntond�: I hrr n,.•;ur-nncw-. In fhn nfp I I - catlnn; and 3. Certifies that said agency has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and B .227Y Resolution No. 2779 (1975 Series) APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR 1974 STATE GRANT MONEYS MITCHELL PARK PROJECT 4. Certifies that said agency meets the planning requirements and that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and 5. Appoints the Director of Parks & Recreation as agent of the city to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and so on which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project; e'nd 6. The Mayor of the City of San Luis Obispo is hereby authorized and directed to execute five copies of said project agreement; and 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this resolution by the Council. ON MOTION of Councilman (,iirnPa seconded by'Counrilman graham , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was duly passed'and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST:. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed by the Counci'I of the City of San Luis Obispo at.a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of April, 1975. ty' "Clerk Resolution No. 2778 (1975 Series) RFSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR 1974 STATE GRANT MONEYS SANTA ROSA PARK PROJECT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the State Beach, Park, Recreational and•Historical Facilities Bond Act of 1974, which provides funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and for developing facilities for public outdoor recreafion and historical purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the-responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by Local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks. and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications prior to submission of said applications to the state; and WHEREAS, said applications contain assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, said procedures further require the applicant to possess an adopted plan showing parks and recreation lands and facilities, existing and proposed; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan was first adopted by the City Council on January 15, 1973; and WHEREAS, the proposed Santa Rosa Park project appears on the city's plan, is consistent with the California Outdoor Recreation Resources Plan, and is in conformity with the State Environmental Goals and Policy Report; and WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby: 1. Approves the filing of an application for 1974 state grant assistance; and 2. Certifies that said agency understands the assurances in the appli- cation; and 3. Certifies that.said agency has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and /� 02;;�J- Resolution No. 2778 (1975 Series) APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR 1974 STATE GRANT MONEYS SANTA ROSA PARK PROJECT 4. Certifies that said agency meets the planning.requirements and that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and 5. Appoints the Director of Parks & Recreation as agent of the city to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and so on which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project; and 6. The Mayor of the City of San Luis Obispo is hereby authorized and directed to execute five copies of said project agreement; and 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this resolution by the Council. ON MOTION of Councilman Gurnee , seconded by Councilman Graham , and the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of April, 1975. I RESOLUTION NO. 2777 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR PREPARATION OF GENERAL PLAN NOISE AND PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENTS. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. This Council hereby approves that certain agreement entitled "Joint Powers Agreement Among the County of San Luis Obispo and the Cities of Arroyo Grande, Grover City, Morro Bay, Paso Robles, Pismo Beach and San Luis Obispo" for the preparation of noise and public safety elements of the General Plan. Copies of said agreement shall be main- tained on file in the office of the City Clerk and in the office of Development Services Department. 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: /7 ;,7 77 RESOLUTION NO. 2776 (1975 Series.) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FINAL MAP OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 425 (CAPITOLIO WAY). BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:• 1. The final map of Minor Subdivision No. 425 on Capitolio Way ("requested by Richard Burke) is hereby approved by the City of San Luis Obispo subject to the conditions. outlined on Minor Subdivision Map 425 and Planning Commission Resolution 694 -75 on file in the Development Services Department. The Council hereby finds that said Minor Subdivision Map and its provisions are consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Luis Obispo. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson, and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: R 2776 RESO- .UTION NO. 2775 (.1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FINAL MAP OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 424 (SAN MARCOS COURT). BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the -City of San Luis 'Obispo as follows: 1.. The final map of Minor Subdivision No. 424 on San Marcos Court (requested by Ken Maclntyre) is hereby approved by the City of San Luis Obispo subject to the conditions out- lined on Minor Subdivision Map 424 on file in the Development Services Department and in City Planning Commission Resolution No. 693 -75. The Council hereby finds that said Minor Subdivision Map and its provisions are consistent with the General Plan of the.City.of San Luis Obispo and the Council hereby accepts on behalf of the City the dedications required by Planning Commission Resolution 693 -75. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson, and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: Jerk R 2775 Poo- �►^ RESOLUTION NO. 2774 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING,FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES OUTSIDE THE FOUR MINUTE RESPONSE TIME. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. This Council hereby approves special preventive measures for fire protection outside the four minute response time as set forth upon Exhibit "A" attached hereto and thereby incorporated herein. The Fire Department is directed . to include the special measures in the amendments to the 1974 Uniform Fire Code to be presented to the Council at the next regular Council meeting. On motion of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Petterson, and on the following . roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: �c�y erk R 2774 1 EXHIBIT A CONSTPAINTS ON CONSTRUCTION IN AP:,AS BEYOND THE FOUR- MINUTE RESPONSE TIME LINE SECTION 1. Section 13.302 (d) (9) UFC is added to read as follo:as: "9. All buildings constructed in locations \.Nhich are beyond the four - minute response time line sho \::n on response map attached to Firs Department P.eport No. 2 -74, a copy of .,ihich is on file at the Fire Departm ent headquarters. exception. To the provisions of Section 13.30£3 (d) UFC. 1. Standard automatic fire extinguishing systems may be omitted, with the Fire Chief's approval, in buildings requiring less than 1,500 gallons per minute fire flow as determined by the Fire Chief.." 2. Standard automatic fire extinguishing systems may be omitted, with the Building Cfficial's and Chief's approval, in buildings used exclusively for storage or use of high value electronic equipment made of non - combustible materials, providing the building is equipped throughout with a heat and "invisible products of combustion other than heat" detector system of a tested and approved design, installed to the satisfaction of the Chief." SECTION follows: 1.301 (d) UFC is added to read as follos: "1. General. All automatic heat and smoke detection systems shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of this article. 2. '.V'here required. smoke detection approved design accordance with and maintainFd in this chapter Approved automatic heat and systems shall be of a tested and and shall be installed in the requirements of the Fire Chief in operable condition as specified in the following locations: (a) In every .story, basement, or cellar of all buildings constructed in locations which are beyond the four- minute response time line shown on response map attached to Fire Department Report. No. 2 -74, a copy of which is on file at Fire Department headquarters. Exception. Automatic heat and smoke detection systems may be omitted, with the Fire Chief's approval, in buildings whose ground floor area is less than 5000 square feet." SECTION 3. Section 1.3.301 (e) UFC is added to read as follows: 111. General. All buildings except separate single family dwellings constructed in locations which are beyond the four - minute response time line shown on response map attached to Fire Department Report No. 2 -749 a copy of ,hich is on file at Fire Department headquarters, shell be provided with interior wall and ceiling construction meeting requirements'of the San Luis Obispo Building Code for "one -hour fire- resistive construction throughout. Exceptions. 1. Cne -hour fire- resistive construction is not rcquircd in buildings ::hose ground floor area is less than 2000 square feet unless otherwise required by provisions of the San Luis Obispo Building Code. 2. One -hour fire - resistive construction is not required in buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic fire extinguishing system unless otherwise required by provision of the San Luis Obispo Building Code. 3. Cne -hour fire- resistive construction is not required in buildings provided r:ith automatic heat and smoke detection systems prescribed by Municipal Code Section 3120.4.10 unless otherwise required by provisions of the San Luis Obispo Building Code." SECTION 4. Section 13.301 (f) UFC is _.added to read as follov;s : "1. General. All buildings constructed in locations which are beyond the four- minute response time line shown on response map attached to Fire Department Report No. 2 -74, a copy of . %hick is on filc at Fire Department headquarters, shall be designed so that %,.ind6- s required for rescue of occupants can be reached riith 24 -foot extension ladders carried on Fire Department pumpers." RESOLUTION NO. 2773 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION-OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND AUTHOR - IZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SAME. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. This Council hereby approves the application for $500,000 federal assistance under the;Community Development Block Grant Program in accordance with the application on file in the office of the Community Development Department dated May 15, 1975. 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute said application on behalf of the City. On motion of Councilman Gurnee, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Norris the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: ty Clerk R2773 04595 <!5F E0000IN ��= 045951415^ E00000.00CA DM mo. ' 11 RECORDING REQUESTED.BY ar,d OFFICIAL" RECO'RM ' WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO SAN LUIS CBISPO CO CAC ;`CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APR 15 1975 P.O. Box 321 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 - MILIAM E. ZIMARIIC �Q COUNTY, RECt7RLT£E� 'ocu^:ertary trcnsfe; tea -y on !ill valve c: _rrcpc.ry ca_c_,c1, COMPARED ' GRANT DEED . Si �'•a.' rcCc/:_ccrant cr cocnt c.ac: r... ng bx— /`•irrc ncm ] LTa ..crpo:atel area City of son 4 s �l�ls� FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and subject to the covenants, conditions, restric- tions and reservations set forth, VIRGINIA J. TYNAN, also known - i as VIRGINIA JACK TYNAN, PHYLLIS SINTON, also known as PHYLLIS JACK SINTON, MARGARET E. KAETZEL, also known as MARGARET KAETZEL, ?'- GERTRUDE K. KAETZEL, also known as KATHLEEN KAETZEL and GERTRUDE KATHLEEN KAETZEL, KATHLEEN G. VON STEIN, formerly KATHLEEN G. �:,`''•" NORMAND, JUDITH MEYER,.formerly JUDITH KAETZEL, and MELBA RETICKER, Grantors, do hereby grant to the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, A MUNI- 'CIPAL CORPORATION, the,following described real property in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California: ;,. Commencing at a point on the southerly line of Higuera Street South 530 7' West, One Hundred Cw :. and eighty -three feet, six inches (183 -6/12 feet) from the Southwest corner of Higuera and Nipoma Streets and running thence south 53° 7' West on :�''.:ib7c mid':': ••. �; . the south line of Higuera Street two hundred and twenty -five (225) feet, thence south 36° 53' east 1 ` to the line of Marsh Street; thence Northeasterly ' along the line of Marsh Street, two hundred and twenty -five (225) feet; thence at right angles northwesterly to Higuera Street and the point of „._.r beginning and being all that portion of Block 62 . of the City of San Luis Obispo, occupied as a `.,= 4rg•.`•a;',:.:.i.;; residence of R. E. Jack and wife, and extending from Higuera Street to Marsh Street according to two deeds: One made by H. M. Warden to Nellie x: •:. Hollister Jack dated August 9 1875; and the other made by Thomas Higuera and others on February 11, 1876 to R. Edgar Jack, and both of record in the Recorder's Office of San Luis Obispo County, State of California. Excepting therefrom that portion thereof conveyed to Manuel F. Lima, et ux, by deed dated September 29, .µ•r. : (,tom• .iG,"..'.. —. ,. ::`:• : • ' "'" 1922, and recorded October 2, 1922 in Book 157, t� Page 410 of . Deeds. "Also excepting therefrom that portion thereof con - "'Fr; .veyed by deed dated November 14, 1917 and recorded -November 22, 1917, in Book 118, Page 449 of Deeds to Nicholas F. Schlicht. ILAIt to r]AIF,iSrNT TO RETURN ;ADDRESS ;ABOVE 1 - + X 'SifitCiGE lT`TO•R URi I ADDRESS ALM .- Together with all furniture, fixtures, equipment, docu- ments, books and other personal property situated in or on said real property. By the acceptance of this deed, said City of San Luis Obispo, hereinafter referred to as "City ", agrees: To keep, preserve-and use_ said real property and the residence situated thereon in a manner which maintains, enhances 4 ".' and celebrates'its place in the historical development of San -:,>: ' `• Luis Obispo. `• 2. To refer to the house and grounds as "The Jack Residence" as a memorial to Robert Edgar Jack and Nellie Hollister Jack, .x.;`,. pioneers and builders, as well as devoted citizens, of San Luis 'Obispo City and County. 3. To maintain the original character of the house as an ;...example of a Victorian vintage residence. General maintenance `-':.and any restoration improvements shall be in keeping with the 'zC is ''1:' ;- ':' - .' ' ":'.'. '•.: age and period when'the original residence was constructed. .mss,• t 4. To care for and preserve existing trees and shrubbery, ,rr: "and to return the gardens as much as possible to the appearance of the gardens as illustrated in photographs circa 1910 -1920 n^ provided by the Grantors. 5. To keep the residence and contents thereof adequately T insured against loss by fire and other insurable hazards. 6. To permit, subject to reasonable rules and regulations, residents of the City and County of San Luis Obispo, visitors and tourists to enter and inspect the residence and gardens and any displays and exhibits which from time to time may be presented. r,7; ...c.,..,. _ . 7., = To appoint a committee of seven (7) members whose onsibilit res shall be'to advise the City Council in the P Y 2 PAGEIII 7X 4 iP' • IVI 8 Together with all furniture, fixtures, equipment, docu- ments, books and other personal property situated in or on said real property. By the acceptance of this deed, said City of San Luis Obispo, hereinafter referred to as "City ", agrees: To keep, preserve-and use_ said real property and the residence situated thereon in a manner which maintains, enhances 4 ".' and celebrates'its place in the historical development of San -:,>: ' `• Luis Obispo. `• 2. To refer to the house and grounds as "The Jack Residence" as a memorial to Robert Edgar Jack and Nellie Hollister Jack, .x.;`,. pioneers and builders, as well as devoted citizens, of San Luis 'Obispo City and County. 3. To maintain the original character of the house as an ;...example of a Victorian vintage residence. General maintenance `-':.and any restoration improvements shall be in keeping with the 'zC is ''1:' ;- ':' - .' ' ":'.'. '•.: age and period when'the original residence was constructed. .mss,• t 4. To care for and preserve existing trees and shrubbery, ,rr: "and to return the gardens as much as possible to the appearance of the gardens as illustrated in photographs circa 1910 -1920 n^ provided by the Grantors. 5. To keep the residence and contents thereof adequately T insured against loss by fire and other insurable hazards. 6. To permit, subject to reasonable rules and regulations, residents of the City and County of San Luis Obispo, visitors and tourists to enter and inspect the residence and gardens and any displays and exhibits which from time to time may be presented. r,7; ...c.,..,. _ . 7., = To appoint a committee of seven (7) members whose onsibilit res shall be'to advise the City Council in the P Y 2 PAGEIII 7X 4 iP' • IVI Q Q .v G' L' EM r administration of The Jack Residence for the greatest possible public use and enjoyment. Said committee shall recommend basic rules and regulations for the use of the residence and grounds which may include, but are not limited to, permitted uses, conditions of use, hours and fees, if any. The committee shall serve without pay and consist of city residents including: (a) One member from the San Luis Obispo County Historical Society. (b) One.member -from the faculty of the School of Archi- .tecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University, preferably a. n. 'architectural historian. '(c) One member from the Ornamental Horticulture ,faculty ` of the California Polytechnic State University. (d) One member from the Parks and Recreation Commission, "k d ^'(e) ' Two members selected at large. is 6," i - : •' !' + N `., , -(f) For a.period of twenty (20) years from the date "f3 >r -.hereof,-the seventh member of the committee shall be an heir of Robert Edgar Jack and Nellie Hollister Jack; the city residency "i requirement may be waived for this member. Thereafter, this member may 'be selected at large. ), Committee appointments, tenure and rules of conduct shall be the•same as for other advisory bodies to the City Council, e.g., the Planning Commission. ' C 8. To accept items of personal property for the permanent..,-,-`.-;;,. •.,"collection of furnishings and artifacts, only upon majority approval `r -,of the Committee. Likewise, to dispose, destroy and give away no ;item'of furnishings or artifacts without majority approval of tho yCommittee`'and then only with the-approval of the city Council. ,a f .- xr " 9. Should at any time, the residenco bo dQettCYGd by 3 + `: U FACE Jl9� S 1 e s VS "',fire or other act of God, to continue to maintain the real rw. property for park purposes, such park to be known as "The Jack ,Park" 10. Not to sell or give away either the whole, or any 1? „.,part of the real property. In,the event of a violation of any of the covenants and '.conditions'herein contained, or failure to comply therewith, said City;” and :any:.successor.thereof,'shall forfeit all title to said .real and personal property and, in the event of any such for- '. y ' .. 1. •.. : is .. • "`feiture, title td.sc aid real and personal property shall revert to the descendants by law of intestacy of Robert Edgar Jack and Nellie Hollister .Jack.�Should` there be no then known descendants of said Robert Edgar Jack and Nellie Hollister Jack, said property shall vest in the County of San Luis Obispo for the uses herein ntained; .provided, however, that if the County should not accept said property or should fail to use it for the purposes set forth herein, title to said property shall then vest in St. Stephen's Episcopal Church of San Luis Obispo. 1i:r' ^'• '; In consideration of the foregoing, the grantee herein ;' agrees to pay all county, city and special taxes or assessments which are now a lien upon the real property and personal property „ -• -.r' .•herein 'described, or which hereafter become a lien upon said real 'and personal property. Dated this day of A/* v 1975 i" inia J. Ty an Gertrude.. Kathleen K a etz &AA 0 61A 6tUeQ1YL-) by lis Sin on ,• Kathleen Von Stein §t' '� " arg ret ✓ Kaetz' 1 / judith Meyer IL J r� aaw J Melba Reticker 4 ;VOL PAGE �� O e s VS "',fire or other act of God, to continue to maintain the real rw. property for park purposes, such park to be known as "The Jack ,Park" 10. Not to sell or give away either the whole, or any 1? „.,part of the real property. In,the event of a violation of any of the covenants and '.conditions'herein contained, or failure to comply therewith, said City;” and :any:.successor.thereof,'shall forfeit all title to said .real and personal property and, in the event of any such for- '. y ' .. 1. •.. : is .. • "`feiture, title td.sc aid real and personal property shall revert to the descendants by law of intestacy of Robert Edgar Jack and Nellie Hollister .Jack.�Should` there be no then known descendants of said Robert Edgar Jack and Nellie Hollister Jack, said property shall vest in the County of San Luis Obispo for the uses herein ntained; .provided, however, that if the County should not accept said property or should fail to use it for the purposes set forth herein, title to said property shall then vest in St. Stephen's Episcopal Church of San Luis Obispo. 1i:r' ^'• '; In consideration of the foregoing, the grantee herein ;' agrees to pay all county, city and special taxes or assessments which are now a lien upon the real property and personal property „ -• -.r' .•herein 'described, or which hereafter become a lien upon said real 'and personal property. Dated this day of A/* v 1975 i" inia J. Ty an Gertrude.. Kathleen K a etz &AA 0 61A 6tUeQ1YL-) by lis Sin on ,• Kathleen Von Stein §t' '� " arg ret ✓ Kaetz' 1 / judith Meyer IL J r� aaw J Melba Reticker 4 ;VOL PAGE �� O � b • i � - 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN.LUIS OBISPO, ss. O u• ` On 1975, before me, the undersigned, a:,Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally ,appeared MARGARET E. KAETZEL, GERTRUDE KATHLEEN KAETZEL, KATHLEEN G. VON STEIN, VIRGINIA J. TYNAN and PHYLLIS SINTON , ,;known to to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the +,,,within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same. �F G!CIE GIA & 'FANT N]TABY PUBLIC SAN LUIS 03!S ?0 COUNTY Not P CAUFSIINIA .1.'.9. .. i.:N .�`:;;'_ *�.,; ^• -My Commission Expires February 7, 1976, r•STATE OF COLORADO, ) i . ss. 7 ' COUNTY .OF Pp Sllh.$CI', e :? "eacecut L' 1 Georgia E. Fant c in and for said County and State. / % , 1975., before me, the undersigned, blic in and for said County and State, personally DITH MEYER, known to me to be the person whose name is }c»� to the within instrument and acknowledged that she je- LI,I f y1 i(.h •1 ''{�Y%Sf�Z,I' +�V' � , 3.i:e i ur% v, OFFICIAL SEAL " U Notary Public in and for said County and P State. <. ' .;; ;,': .:'•PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN �° ty .`� SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT. 29, •1976 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) COUNTY OF Santa Barbara On March 12 1975, before me, the undersigned, Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared ;,. • -t MELBA RETICKER, known to me to be the person whose name is subscri- ?t =':. bed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed he same. i LUE E. DAVIS Notary Public in and for said County and State. 5 - VCL 828 PACE 1°x.1' ; If OFFICIAL SEAL CUE .F- . DAV[S P :;NOTARY PUBLIC• CALIFORNIA <. ' .;; ;,': .:'•PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN �° ty .`� SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT. 29, •1976 ly 1521` -n•T" -ti' J' r ; . � r - 1F yy' t •. , LUE E. DAVIS Notary Public in and for said County and State. 5 - VCL 828 PACE 1°x.1' ; If C E R T I F I C A T E O F A C C E P T A N C E THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by the GRANT DEED dated MARCH 10, 1975, from VIRGINIA J. TYNAN, aka VIRGINIA JACK TYNAN, PHYLLIS SINTON,_aka PHYLLIS JACK SINTON, MARGARET E. KAETZEL, aka MARGARET KAETZEL, GERTRUDE K. KAETZEL, -i aka KATHLEEN KAETZEL and GERTRUDE KATHLEEN KAETZEL, KATHLEEN G. VON STEIN, formerly KATHLEEN G. NORMAND, JUDITH MEYER, formerly JUDITH KAETZEL, and MELBA RETICKER, Grantors, to the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a Political Corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. 549 (1959 Series), recorded May 26, 1959, F` Volume 1002, Official Records, Page 292, San Luis Obispo County, California, and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer or his agent. Date: MARCH 10, 1975 ATTEST: "ty fl�rk ", IQ err1 QR RESOLUTION NO. 2772 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON CHORRO STREET NEAR MEINECKE STREET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. A no parking zone is hereby established.on the easterly side of Chorro Street commencing at the intersection of the westerly prolongation of the southerly property line of Meinecke Street and extending 40 feet southerly. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham,. Gurnee, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Norris the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: R 2772. RESOLUTION NO. 2771 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON CHORRO STREET NEAR MURRAY STREET. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. A no parking zone is.hereby established on the easterly side of Chorro Street commencing at the intersection of the westerly prolongation of the southerly property line of Murray Street, thence continuing 60 feet southerly. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Gurnee, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman. Norris the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21st day of April, 1975. ATTEST: R 2771 i RESOLUTION NO. 2770 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE CLOSING OF STATE HIGHWAY FOR LA FIESTA PARADE. WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of San Luis Obispo will be holding their annual community celebration on May 15, 16, 17 and 18, 1975; and WHEREAS, a parade on Saturday morning, May 17, 1975, is an integral part of the La Fiesta Celebration; and WHEREAS, La Fiesta Celebration is a most important civic celebration, drawing visitors to this City from distant places to see this most extraordinary parade and to visit the early California historical sites of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that: 1. A Parade Permit be issued to La Fiesta Association authorizing the closing of Highway 227 to Broad Street and the closing of Highway 101 off -ramp at Marsh Street during the hours of 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P. M. on May 17, 1975. 2. The City Police Department and other City departments axe directed to cooperate with La Fiesta officials in putting on the parade. 3. The Department of Transportation and the California Highway Patrol shall be notified of the proposed closing of a portion of a State Highway for this parade, and they are hereby requested to approve this action. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, and on the following roll call vote: R 2770 Resolution No. 2`i /0 2 '(1975 Series) AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, P.etterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 7th day of April, 1975. ATTEST: RESOLUTION NO. 276.9 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN.AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RE OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE PIPE FOR HIGHWAY 227, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME. BE IT.RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: This Council hereby approves the Ownership and Maintenance Agreement, dated May 13, 1975, between the California Department of Transportation and the City of San Luis Obispo providing for City acceptance and maintenance of a 54 inch concrete pipe and appurtenant drainage facilities in Funston Avenue and Meadow Street outside of the Highway 227 right of way. The Mayor is authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City. A copy of said agreement shall be maintained on file in the Office of the City Clerk for public inspection. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson, Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Gurnee the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May, 1975. ATTEST: R 2769 OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA R The City of San Luis Obispo agrees to take over the ownership and maintenance of the 54 inch reinforced concrete pipe and appurtenant drainage facilities installed outside of the Route 227 right -of -way in Funston Avenue and in Meadow Street between Funston Avenue and the point of discharge approximately 275 feet south of Funston Avenue in accordance with the plans and specifications for the Route 227 (Broad Street) Improvement Project from 0-.2 miles west of Corral De Piedra Creek in Edna to High Street in San Luis Obispo. The State of California shall hold the City of San Luis Obispo and any of its departments, officers and employees harmless from any and all claims or losses for personal injury, property damage, or any other cause arising from anything done or omitted to be done under or in connection with the installation of the aforesaid drainage system. These facilities shall be accepted by the City of San Luis Obispo upon the date of acceptance of the completed contract by the State of California. DATED: ATTEST: "H. Fitzpatrick, City C er 1 L.. 4 �• C A OF-SAN LUIS OBISPO STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: _ Title: r 9 r RESG-�JTION NO. 2768 (1975 Series A RESOLUTION OF THE COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF SAKI LUIS OBISPO REAFFIRMING THE CITY'S DRAINAGE AND PAVEOUT POLICY. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that the following policy concerning drainage and paveout is hereby reaffirmed.: 1. City designs and pays for all drainage. structures (drop inlets, pipes, etc.) when required due to the construction of curb and gutter on an accepted City street. 2. City paves out "in kind" to all newly constructed curb and gutter. Builder of the curb and gutter will provide. base. "In kind" means constructing with the same material as the existing traveled way. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 7th day of April, 1975. ATTEST: er R 2768 RESOLUTION NO. 2767 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO INTERPRETING CITY ORDINANCE PROVISIONS CONCERNING FIRE HYDRANTS IN CUL- DE- SACS.. .BE IT.RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. This Council hereby interprets Municipal Code Section 7410.7.5.2(a) (which requires the connection of City fire hydrants to a "reliable water distribution system ") to be inapplicable to fire hydrants installed at the end of cul- de -sacs or other dead -end mains when the primary purpose of said fire hydrants is to substitute for blow -off or flush valves which would otherwise be required if there were no such hydrant. In no case shall the presence of such fire hydrants obviate the requirement that other hydrants con - nected.to a reliable distribution system shall be capable of providing required fire flows to all premises and.structures in the vicinity of the cul -de -sac or dead -end. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Mayor Schwartz, and on the following roll call vote: • AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None. ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted 7th day of April, 1975. ATTEST: WEE R 2767 RESOLUTION NO. 2766 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FINAL MAP OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 423. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. The final map of Minor Subdivision No. 423 on Laurel Lane at Orcutt Road (Maino Construction Company) is hereby approved by the City of San Luis Obispo subject to the conditions outlined on Minor Subdivision Map 423 on file in the office of the Development Services Department. The Council hereby finds that said Minor Subdivision Map and its provisions are.consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Luis Obispo and the Council hereby accepts on behalf of the City the dedications required by said map and Planning Commission Resolution No. 691. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Norris, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilman Petterson the foregoing.Resolution was passed and adopted this 5th day of May , 1975. ATTEST: t'y C rk R 2766 RESOLUTION NO. 2765 (1975 Series); A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING GENERAL REVENUE SHARING PLANNED USE REPORT NO. 6 FOR YEAR 1975 -76. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. A duly noticed public hearing having been held this date, the Council hereby approves General Revenue Sharing Planned Use, Report No. 6 for Fiscal. Year 1975 -76 in the amount of $487,573.00. A copy of said report shall be maintained on file in the office.of the City. Clerk for public inspection during reasonable business hours. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, and on. the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson. and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of June, 1975. ATTEST: R 2765 RES�UTION NO. 2764 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING Aid APPLICATION FOR A CITY SPIRIT GRANT AS REQUESTED BY SOLO FLIGHT AND RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY'S PROMOTIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE. WHEREAS, the National Endowment for the Arts; Washington, D.C., has established a matching grant program for activities focusing attention on the nation's bicentennial; and WHEREAS, Solo.Flight, a local organization, has developed a program known as "city spirit" to plan and implement activ- ities within =the City of San Luis Obispo which would qualify for said grant, but Solo Flight does not have organizational standing to apply for such.a grant; and WHEREAS, the City's Promotional Coordinating Committee has recommended that the City Council support and sponsor Solo Flight's application for such a grant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. This Council hereby approves an application by the City to the National Endowment for the Arts for a matching fund grant to honor the nation's bicentennial in the manner outlined in the application attached hereto marked Exhibit "A'; and thereby incorporated herein. The Mayor is authorized to execute said application on behalf of the City. 2. The following conditions agreed to by Solo Flight, its executive director.Glenna Luschei, and other members of said organization are hereby established: R 2764 ti Resolution No.. 1,_,.4 2 � -= '{(1975 Series) (1) Glenna Luschei shall deposit on behalf of the City the sum of $4,900 as a guarantee that the City will not suffer any financial loss as a result of said application. The said sum' shall. be deposited in an account under the City's name at a financial institution mutually agreeable to the parties. The City shall have full discretion to. withdraw any and all of the said sum at any time for.the purpose of satisfying financial obligations connected with the "city. spirit" program. Any interest accumulated on said sum shall vest in said Glenna Luschei and shall be distributed to her. On motion.of Mayor Schwartz, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following.roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee and Mayor Schwartz NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmen Norris and Petterson the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of April, 1975. ATTEST: AGREEMENT RE GRANT TO SOLO FLIGHT Date: June 2, 1975 The City of San Luis Obispo and Solo Flight, a non - profit group represented by Glenna Luschei, agree as follows: r 1. The City will grant the sum of $500.00 to Solo Flight for the purpose of sponsoring and conducting activities for the benefit of the public in the Mission Plaza as set forth upon Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. Solo Flight shall, within thirty days after the completion of said activities, provide the City with a detailed report and accounting of the activities conducted and the money and labor expended thereon. ATTEST: er SOLO FLIGHT Glenna Luschei, Director RE9 UTION NO. 2763 (1975 Seri,,.j A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING A PARKING SPACE ON PALM STREET FOR HANDICAPPED MOTORISTS. L BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. That one parking space specifically.set aside for handicapped persons is hereby established on the southerly side of Palm Street commencing 180 feet easterly of the northerly prolongation of the easterly property line of Osos Street and extending twenty feet easterly and that the existing 36 minute time limit for this space is hereby rescinded. On motion of Councilman Graham, seconded by Councilman Petterson, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Gurnee, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz 140ES : None ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was pass.ed and adopted this 7th day of April, 1975. ATTEST: P. R 2763 J RESOLUTION NO. 2762 (1975 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REVISING RATE FOR NEW WATER SERVICE, ACREAGE FEES AND FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. Pursuant to the.provisions of Municipal Code Section 7410.5, charges for new water service on and after April 7, 1975, shall be as follows: WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION CHARGES NOMINAL SERVICE SIZE 3/4 inch 1 inch 1 1/2 inch 2 inch Larger than 2 inch SERVICE INSTALLATION. METER METER INSTALLATION TOTAL $255.00 $65.00 $10.00 $330.00 260.00 90.00 10.00 360.00 435.00 245.00 10.00 690.00 455.00 255.00 10.00 720.00 Actual Cost. Normally installed by applicant. 2. Pursuant to the provisions -of Municipal Code Section 7410.5.1, the.Acreage and Front Footage Charges on and after April 7, 1975, shall be as follows: A. Acreage Charge - $845.00 per acre B. Front: _Toqtag@ Charge_. _._$8.45 .per_front__foo_t 3. Resolution No. 2.558 (1974 . Series) is hereby superseded in full. R 2762 Resolution No.'._62 2 _,`(1975 Series) On motion.of Councilman. Norris, seconded by Councilman Graham, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen Graham, Norris, Petterson and Mayor Schwartz NOES: Councilman Gurnee. ABSENT: None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 7th day of April, 197; ATTEST: