HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-28-2025 PC Agenda Packet
Planning Commission
AGENDA
Wednesday, May 28, 2025, 6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Planning Commission meetings can be viewed remotely on Channel 20, the City’s YouTube Channel,
and on the City’s website under the Public Meeting Agendas web page. Attendees of City Council or
Advisory Body meetings are eligible to receive one hour of complimentary parking; restrictions apply,
visit Parking for Public Meetings for more details.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT:
Public Comment prior to the meeting (must be received 3 hours in advance of the meeting):
Mail - Delivered by the U.S. Postal Service. Address letters to the City Clerk's Office at 990
Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, 93401.
Email - Submit Public Comments via email to advisorybodies@slocity.org. In the body of your
email, please include the date of the meeting and the item number (if applicable). Emails will not
be read aloud during the meeting.
Voicemail - Call (805) 781-7164 and leave a voicemail. Please state and spell your name, the
agenda item number you are calling about, and leave your comment. Verbal comments must be
limited to 3 minutes. Voicemails will not be played during the meeting.
*All correspondence will be archived and distributed to members, however, submissions received
after the deadline may not be processed until the following day.
Public Comment during the meeting:
Meetings are held in-person. To provide public comment during the meeting, you must be
present at the meeting location.
Electronic Visual Aid Presentation. To conform with the City's Network Access and Use Policy,
Chapter 1.3.8 of the Council Policies & Procedures Manual, members of the public who desire
to utilize electronic visual aids to supplement their oral presentation must provide display-ready
material to the City Clerk by 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Contact the City Clerk's
Office at cityclerk@slocity.org or (805) 781-7114.
Pages
1.CALL TO ORDER
Chair Houghton will call the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission to
order.
2.PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
At this time, people may address the Commission about items not on the
agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes per person. Items raised at this
time are generally referred to staff and, if action by the Commission is
necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting.
3.CONSENT
Matters appearing on the Consent Calendar are expected to be non-
controversial and will be acted upon at one time. A member of the public may
request the Planning Commission to pull an item for discussion. The public may
comment on any and all items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute
time limit.
3.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - APRIL 9, 2025 PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES
5
Recommendation:
To approve the Planning Commission Minutes of April 9, 2025.
3.b CITYWIDE (GENP-0359-2025) REVIEW OF THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF THE 2025-27 FINANCIAL PLAN FOR
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY
9
Recommendation:
Adopt a Resolution determining general plan conformance for the 2025-
27 Capital Improvement Plan and that this action is exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per section 15262 which
excludes feasibility and planning studies.
4.PUBLIC HEARINGS
Note: Any court challenge to the action taken on public hearing items on this
agenda may be limited to considering only those issues raised at the public
hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City of San Luis Obispo at,
or prior to, the public hearing. If you wish to speak, please give your name and
address for the record. Please limit your comments to three minutes; consultant
and project presentations limited to six minutes.
4.a 1236 MONTE VISTA PLACE (USE-0332-2025). RE-REVIEW OF AN
EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE
PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
19
Recommendation:
Adopt the Draft Resolution to modify the Conditional Use Permit, based
on updated findings and subject to revised conditions of approval. The
project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section
15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines.
4.b 1304 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 190 CRANDALL WAY (USE-0333-
2025). RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
45
Recommendation:
Adopt the Draft Resolution to modify the Conditional Use Permit, based
on updated findings and subject to revised conditions of approval. The
project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section
15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines.
5.PRESENTATION
5.a CAL POLY, CITY, AND REGIONAL PLANNING GRADUATE
STUDENT STUDIO ON THE UPPER MONTEREY AREA
PRESENTATION
The Planning Commission will receive a presentation from Cal Poly
students regarding the Upper Monterey Area.
6.COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
6.a STAFF UPDATES AND AGENDA FORECAST
Receive a brief update from Deputy Community Development Director
Tyler Corey.
7.ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for June
11, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 990 Palm Street,
San Luis Obispo.
LISTENING ASSISTIVE DEVICES for the hearing impaired--see the Clerk
The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible
to the public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate
alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who
requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting
should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 781-7114 at least
48 hours before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications Device for the
Deaf (805) 781-7410.
Planning Commission meetings are televised live on Charter Channel 20 and on
the City's YouTube Channel: www.youtube.com/CityofSanLuisObispo. Agenda
related writings or documents provided to the Planning Commission are
available for public inspection on the City’s website:
https://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-and-
minutes.
1
Planning Commission Minutes
April 9, 2025, 6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Planning
Commissioners
Present:
Commissioner Justin Cooley, Commissioner Sheryl Flores,
Commissioner Bob Jorgensen, Commissioner Steve Kahn,
Commissioner Juan Munoz-Morris (arrived at 6:05 p.m.), Vice
Chair Eric Tolle, Chair Dave Houghton
City Staff Present: Deputy Community Development Director Tyler Corey, Deputy
City Attorney Sadie Symens, Megan Wilbanks, Deputy City Clerk
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Planning Commission was called to
order on April 9, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 990
Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, by Chair Cooley.
2. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
As required by the Planning Commission Bylaws, hold the election of
Commissioners to serve as Chair and Vice Chair to a one-year term.
Motion By Commissioner Jorgensen
Second By Commissioner Kahn
Elect Commissioner Dave Houghton to the position of Chair for a 1-year term.
Ayes (6): Commissioner Flores, Commissioner Jorgensen, Commissioner Kahn,
Commissioner Tolle, Vice Chair Houghton, and Chair Cooley
Absent (1): Commissioner Munoz-Morris
CARRIED (6 to 0)
Motion By Commissioner Jorgensen
Second By Commissioner Kahn
Elect Commissioner Tolle to the position of Vice Chair for a 1-year term.
Ayes (6): Commissioner Flores, Commissioner Jorgensen, Commissioner Kahn,
Commissioner Tolle, Vice Chair Houghton, and Chair Cooley
Absent (1): Commissioner Munoz-Morris
CARRIED (6 to 0)
Page 5 of 90
2
Commissioner Munoz-Morris joined the meeting at 6:05 p.m.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Public Comment:
None
--End of Public Comment--
4. CONSENT
Chair Houghton pulled Item 4b
4.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - MARCH 12, 2025 PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES
Motion By Commissioner Kahn
Second By Commissioner Munoz-Morris
To approve the Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2025.
Ayes (6): Commissioner Cooley, Commissioner Jorgensen, Commissioner
Kahn, Commissioner Munoz-Morris, Vice Chair Tolle, and Chair Houghton
Abstained (1): Commissioner Flores (Per the PC Bylaws, abstentions
without a conflict of interest are counted as a “Yes” vote)
CARRIED (7 to 0)
4.b REQUEST TO ABANDON A 10-FOOT-WIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
BETWEEN 1998 AND 2006 SAN LUIS DRIVE IN THE R-1 ZONE (STAB-
0759-2024)
Public Comment:
Kerry Margason
--End of Public Comment--
Motion By Chair Houghton
Second By None
To continue this item to a date uncertain.
FAILED due to lack of a Second
Motion By Commissioner Cooley
Second By Commissioner Munoz-Morris
Adopt a Resolution which finds that the abandonment of a 10-foot-wide
public right of way between 1998 and 2006 San Luis Drive is in conformity
with the General Plan and recommend that the City Council approve the
abandonment by adopting a Resolution of Vacation.
Page 6 of 90
3
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING
COMMISSION FINDING THE PROPOSED STREET ABANDONMENT IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND RECOMMENDING
THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF VACATION
ABANDONING A 10-FOOT-WIDE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN
1998 AND 2006 SAN LUIS DRIVE. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA) AS REPRESENTED IN THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS
DATED APRIL 9, 2025 (STAB-0759-2024)"
Ayes (6): Commissioner Cooley, Commissioner Flores, Commissioner
Jorgensen, Commissioner Kahn, Commissioner Munoz-Morris, and Vice
Chair Tolle
Noes (1): Chair Houghton
CARRIED (6 to 1)
5. PUBLIC HEARING
5.a REVIEW OF TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
17.86.080 (CANNABIS) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING REGULATIONS) (CODE-
0051-2025)
No Commissioners reported having Ex Parte Communications.
Cannabis Business Coordinator Ivana Gomez presented the staff report
and responded to Commission inquiries.
Chair Houghton opened the Public Hearing
Public Comment:
None
--End of Public Comment--
Chair Houghton closed the Public Hearing
Motion By Vice Chair Tolle
Second By Commissioner Munoz-Morris
Adopt a Resolution recommending the City Council introduce and approve
an Ordinance to amend Section 17.86.080 (“Cannabis”) of Title 17
(“Zoning Regulations”) of the Municipal Code to clarify specific land use
and operational requirements for commercial cannabis activity.
Page 7 of 90
4
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL INTRODUCE
AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17.86.080
(“CANNABIS”) OF TITLE 17 (“ZONING REGULATIONS”) OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY SPECIFIC LAND USE AND
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL CANNABIS
ACTIVITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW (CEQA) AS REPRESENTED IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED APRIL 9, 2025
(CITYWIDE; CODE-0051-2025)"
Ayes (7): Commissioner Cooley, Commissioner Flores, Commissioner
Jorgensen, Commissioner Kahn, Commissioner Munoz-Morris, Vice Chair
Tolle, and Chair Houghton
CARRIED (7 to 0)
6. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
6.a STAFF UPDATES AND AGENDA FORECAST
Deputy Community Development Director Tyler Corey provided the
following update of upcoming projects:
The April 23rd meeting will be canceled due to lack of items.
Tentatively scheduled for the May 14th meeting, is review of
several Conditional Use Permits for existing fraternities and review
of the General Plan Conformity Report for the City's Capital
Improvement Program.
Tentatively scheduled for the May 28th meeting, is additional review
of Conditional Use Permits for existing fraternities and a
presentation from planning students from Cal Poly regarding
development opportunities in the upper Monterey area.
Commissioner Flores noted she will be absent for the May 14th meeting.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:21 p.m. The next Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission is scheduled for May 14, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. The April 23, 2025
meeting will be canceled due to lack of items.
_________________________
APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION: XX/XX/2025
Page 8 of 90
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: CITYWIDE (GENP-0359-2025) REVIEW OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN OF THE 2025-27 FINANCIAL PLAN FOR GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY
BY: Madeline Kacsinta, Capital Improvement FROM: Tyler Corey, Deputy Director
Program Administrative Manager of Community Development
Phone Number: 805-781-7094 Phone Number: 805-781-7169
Email: mkacsint@slocity.org Email: tcorey@slocity.org
APPLICANT: City of San Luis Obispo REPRESENTATIVE: Madeline Kacsinta
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution determining general plan conformance for the 2025 -27 Capital
Improvement Plan and that this action is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) per section 15262 which excludes feasibility and planning studies.
1.0 COMMISSION'S PURVIEW
California Government Code § 65401 states: “If a general plan or part thereof has been
adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city
officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or
board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose
jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include
recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to
the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors
or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning,
initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving
the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall
prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such
coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for
review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general
plan or part thereof.”
San Luis Obispo's multi-year budget approach complies with the intent of this section,
with the Planning Commission fulfilling the role of "planning agency" in its review of the
proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) every two years.
The Commission's reporting that a proposed CIP conforms with the General Plan does
not necessarily mean that the City endorses the project in a particular form. Individual
projects must be more fully scoped, planned, designed, and undergo environmental
review prior to receiving approval to be implemented. The City Council has full discretion
in deciding CIP items. There are no specific sanctions in State law if a CIP item is found
not to conform with the General Plan; however, a finding of non-conformance would
indicate that the plan should be re-evaluated.
Meeting Date: 5/28/2025
Item Number: 3b
Time Estimate: N/A
Page 9 of 90
Item 3b
GENP-0359-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
2.0 SUMMARY
The CIP proposed as part of the 2025-27 Financial Plan includes a variety of projects and
purchases. Construction projects and equipment purchases costing $25,000 or more are
typically included in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Capital outlays of less than
$25,000 are included in the Financial Plan operating program budgets. Through the CIP,
the City systematically plans, schedules, and finances capital projects to ensure cost-
effectiveness and conformance with established policies and longer-term plans.
The City Council prioritizes and allocates limited resources every two years after carefully
considering community input. Not all Ge neral Plan goals, Specific Plans, or Concept
Plans may be funded. Consequently, the proposed CIP must prioritize funding based on
the Council’s assessment of community needs and priorities. The proposed CIP is a ten -
year plan where funding is approved by Council for the first two years and the following 8
years are projected for consideration in the next Financial Plan.
3.0 PREVIOUS REVIEW
The Draft 2025–27 Capital Improvement Plan has undergone several stages of review to
ensure alignment with City priorities and long-term financial strategies. As part of the
Strategic Budget Direction, the Draft CIP was presented to the City Council on April 15,
2025, to receive early input and confirm that the proposed project list supports key
strategic goals.
Additionally, on May 8, 2025, all projects proposed for funding through the Local Revenue
Measure (LRM) were reviewed by the Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission
(REOC). This review focused on confirming that LRM-funded projects align with voter-
approved priorities and the intent of the measure.
4.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
The evaluation of General Plan conformity is based on the purpose of the proposed
spending, rather than their funding sources. CIP projects can be funded from various
funding sources which include the General Fund, Grants, Impact Fees as well as the
City's Enterprise Funds which include the Sewer Fund, Water Fund, Whale Rock Fund,
Parking Fund, and Transit Fund which are typically supported by user fees.
To assess conformity, a policy audit of the General Plan was conducted. The results are
presented in the matrix provided as Attachment A, which outlines how each proposed
CIP project aligns with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The matrix includes all
CIP projects that are proposed and funded in the first two years of the 2025–27 Financial
Plan, with each project linked to a corresponding General Plan program or policy it
supports.
4.1 Expanded Project Funding for Fiscal Years 2025-27
In November 2020, voters passed Measure G-20, which expanded the existing sales tax
from 0.5% to 1.5%. As a result, the Local Revenue Measure now provides $50 million in
Capital Improvement Plan funding over the 2025-27 Financial Plan period. This additional
funding will be utilized for large-scale infrastructure projects, as well as provide for an
expansion of the quantity and budget of asset maintenance and replacement projects.
Page 10 of 90
Item 3b
GENP-0359-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The determination of conformity with the General Plan is exempt from environmental
review as a Statutory Exemption under Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15262). Each project listed as part of the CIP will need future
authorization and environmental review prior to construction.
6.0 OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Comments from the other departments have been incorporated into the recommended
CIP projects proposed as part of the 2025-27 Financial Plan.
7.0 ALTERNATIVES
The Commission may direct staff to revise the report. There is no legally mandated
deadline for Commission action; however, if any changes are made, the revised report
must return to the Planning Commission for a new determination of General Plan
conformance prior to adoption by the City Council. If the revisions are limited to one or
two projects, staff could identify those specific items for City Council consideration and
return to the Commission with only those projects for a revised determination.
8.0 ATTACHMENTS
A - General Plan Conformity CIP Project Matrix
B - Draft PC Resolution (GENP-0359-2025)
Page 11 of 90
Page 12 of 90
Capital Imrovement Plan for the 2025-27 Financial Plan
GENP 0359-2025
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY MATRIX FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 2-Year Total
Circulation Element: Manage City operations for energy efficiency, including purchase and use of vehicles, equipment and materials $ 2,338,000 $ 3,208,000 $ 5,546,000
CIP No. #2000513 - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations 442,000$ 430,000$ 872,000$
CIP No. #2000519 - Fleet Replacement: Parks and Rec 95,000$ 68,500$ 163,500$
CIP No. #2000520 - Fleet Replacement: Public Works 368,000$ 697,500$ 1,065,500$
CIP No. #2000521 - Fleet Replacement: Utilities 238,000$ 600,000$ 838,000$
CIP No. #2000536 - Fleet Replacement: Transit 150,000$ 150,000$
CIP No. #2000553 - Fleet Replacement: Police 705,000$ 437,000$ 1,142,000$
CIP No. #2000554 - Fleet Replacement: Fire 300,000$ 675,000$ 975,000$
CIP No. #2000611 - Fleet Replacement: Parking 50,000$ 50,000$
CIP No. #2091633 - Corp Yard Storage Stalls 100,000$ 100,000$
CIP No. #2091634 - Fire Station 1 Wash Area 40,000$ 150,000$ 190,000$
Circulation Element: The City shall design and maintain bikeways to make bicycling safe, convenient and enjoyable. The City shall
encourage and promote walking as a regular means of transportation. $ 2,590,000 $ 480,000 $ 3,070,000
CIP No. #2000157 - Banner Arms, Bench Arms Rests, Signs 25,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$
CIP No. #2000165 - Transportation Impact Fee Program Update 50,000$ 50,000$
CIP No. #2000537 - Transportation Monitoring & Modeling Update 15,000$ 55,000$ 70,000$
CIP No. #2000608 - Active Transportation Plan Implementation 200,000$ 200,000$
CIP No. #2001057 - ATP - Higuera Complete Street Project 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$
CIP No. #2001058 - ATP - Foothill Boulevard Complete Street Project 200,000$ 200,000$
Circulation Element: The City shall improve and expand city bus service to make the system more convenient and accessible for
everyone.2,960,000$ 1,165,000$ 4,125,000$
CIP No. #2000053 - Bus Wash Replacement 75,000$ 75,000$
CIP No. #2000102 - Parking Lot Maintenance - Bus Yard 600,000$ -$ 600,000$
CIP No. #2000405 - Transit Fleet 1,500,000$ 1,000,000$ 2,500,000$
CIP No. #2000506 - Bus Stop Improvements 350,000$ 90,000$ 440,000$
CIP No. #2001033 - Downtown Transit Center Rehabilitation 250,000$ -$ 250,000$
CIP No. #2000533 - Cutaway Bus Replacememt 260,000$ 260,000$
Conservation and Open Space Element: Secure and maintain a healthy and attractive Greenbelt around the urban area. $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 550,000
CIP No. #2001011 - Open Space Maintenance 125,000$ 125,000$ 250,000$
CIP No. #2099837 - Open Space Acquisition 150,000$ 150,000$ 300,000$
Conservation and Open Space Element: The City will use material efficiently in its buildings and facilities, services and operations, and
encourage others to do the same. $ 852,500 $ 400,000 $ 1,252,500
CIP No. #2000075 - Major Facility Maintenance 252,500$ 400,000$ 652,500$
CIP No. #2000508 - City Hall Drought Tolerant Landscaping and Restroom 300,000$ 300,000$
CIP No. #2001056 - Water Treatment Plant - Building Maintenance 300,000$ 300,000$
Conservation and Open Space: Emphasize the planting and maintenance of California Native tree species of sufficient height, spread,
form and horticultural characteristics to create the desired streetscape canopy, shade, buffering from adjacent uses, and other desired
streetscape characteristics, consistent with the Tree Ordinance or as recommended by the Tree Committee or as approved by the
Architectural Review Commission. $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 800,000
CIP No. #2000027 - Urban Forest Maintenance 400,000$ 400,000$ 800,000$
A - General Plan Conformity CIP Project MatrixPage 13 of 90
Capital Imrovement Plan for the 2025-27 Financial Plan
GENP 0359-2025
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY MATRIX FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 2-Year Total
Conservation and Open Space: The City will manage its operations for efficient materials use by: A. Substituting electronic information
exchange for paper whenever feasible and cost-effective 1,745,000$ 621,281$ 2,366,281$
CIP No. #2000601 - Public Safety IT Replacements 1,152,000$ 397,867$ 1,549,867$
CIP No. #2000603 - Enterprise IT Replacements 351,000$ 351,000$
CIP No. #2000604 - Network IT Replacements 242,000$ 223,414$ 465,414$
Conservation and Open Space: The City will use material efficiently in its buildings and facilities, services and operations, and
encourage others to do the same. $ 1,300,990 $ 6,200,000 $ 7,500,990
CIP No. #2000516 - Fire Station 3&4 Remodel 1,300,990$ 1,300,990$
CIP No. #2001063 - Broadband Plan -$ 6,200,000$ 6,200,000$
Land Use Element: Develop buildings and facilities which will contribute to our sense of place and architectural heritage. $ 210,000 $ 365,000 $ 575,000
CIP No. #2000406 - Senior Center Paint and Window 35,000$ 35,000$
CIP No. #2000503 - Public Art Maintenance 110,000$ 210,000$ 320,000$
CIP No. #2000510 - Public Art Installations 100,000$ 100,000$ 200,000$
CIP No. #2000512 - Downtown Zig-Zig Lighting 20,000$ 20,000$
Land Use Element: The City shall ensure there is a diversity of parking opportunities in the Downtown. Any major increments in parking
supply should take the form of structures, located at the edges of the commercial core, so people can walk rather than drive between
points within the core.1,127,800$ 500,000$ 1,627,800$
CIP No. #2000117 - Cultural Arts District Parking Structure 627,800$ 627,800$
CIP No. #2000574 - Parking Pay Station Installation 500,000$ 500,000$ 1,000,000$
N/A 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 8,000,000$
CIP No. #CIP Res - CIP Reserve 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 8,000,000$
Parks and Recreation Element: The City shall develop and maintain a park system.9,289,612$ 885,000$ 10,174,612$
CIP No. #2000030 - Laguna Lake Golf Course Maintenance 10,000$ 10,000$
CIP No. #2000033 - Playground Equipment Replacement 585,000$ 585,000$
CIP No. #2000054 - Righetti Community Park 6,500,000$ 6,500,000$
CIP No. #2000115 - Sinsheimer Park Playground Turf, Soft Surface Replacement 50,000$ 50,000$
CIP No. #2000514 - Emerson Park Amenity Upgrades and Beautification 1,854,612$ 1,854,612$
CIP No. #2000568 - Golf Course Pro Shop - Flood Damage Repair -$ 250,000$ 250,000$
CIP No. #2001010 - Parks Major Maintenance 350,000$ 575,000$ 925,000$
Safety Element: Ensure the City and all relevant City departments have adequate planning, organization, and resources for emergency
preparedness and emergency response.2,475,000$ 4,510,000$ 6,985,000$
CIP No. #2000118 - Public Safety Center -$ 200,000$ 200,000$
CIP No. #2000119 - Police Building - 1042 Tenant Improvements 350,000$ 4,310,000$ 4,660,000$
CIP No. #2000120 - Police Building - 1042 Stop Gap Improvements 250,000$ 250,000$
CIP No. #2000122 - Fire Station 5 150,000$ 150,000$
CIP No. #2000577 - Police Station TI - 1106 Walnut 75,000$ 75,000$
CIP No. #2001075 - Parking Structure Safety Element R&D 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$
CIP No. #2001076 - Roadway Barricade Enhancements 150,000$ 150,000$
Safety Element: The City should allow flood waters to move through natural channels. Flow should be accommodated by removing
debris and manmade obstructions.200,000$ 4,833,315$ 5,033,315$
CIP No. #2001032 - Pismo Street Retaining Wall (Storm Recovery)100,000$ 1,900,000$ 2,000,000$
A - General Plan Conformity CIP Project MatrixPage 14 of 90
Capital Imrovement Plan for the 2025-27 Financial Plan
GENP 0359-2025
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY MATRIX FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 2-Year Total
CIP No. #2001071 - Storm Response and Recovery 100,000$ 2,183,315$ 2,283,315$
CIP No. #2090742 - Storm Drains -$ 750,000$ 750,000$
Water and Wastewater Management Element: Manage the City’s water resources to meet the current and future water demand
requirements associated with development envisioned by the General Plan.15,518,800$ 11,078,000$ 26,596,800$
CIP No. #2000062 - Water Meters and Boxes 1,916,000$ 1,916,000$ 3,832,000$
CIP No. #2000063 - Water Distribution Fire Hydrants 55,000$ 55,000$ 110,000$
CIP No. #2000065 - Point Repair 150,000$ 150,000$
CIP No. #2000082 - Sewer Lift Station Replacement - Silver City 200,000$ 200,000$
CIP No. #2000084 - Sewer Maintenance Cover Adjustments 110,000$ 30,000$ 140,000$
CIP No. #2000092 - Sewer Main Replacement: Buchon - Morro to Johnson 135,000$ 135,000$
CIP No. #2000150 - SGMA GSP 150,000$ 150,000$ 300,000$
CIP No. #2000170 - Islay Sewer Replacement 2,100,000$ 2,100,000$
CIP No. #2000527 - Point Repairs - Wastewater Collections System 340,000$ 240,000$ 580,000$
CIP No. #2000529 - Recycled Water Orcutt Street - Fernwood to Laurel -$ 1,900,000$ 1,900,000$
CIP No. #2000530 - Recycled Water Tank 100,000$ 100,000$
CIP No. #2000561 - Sewer-main Replacement: Morro, Mill, Santa Rosa, and Chorro 45,000$ 45,000$
CIP No. #2000563 - Waterline Replacement: California Ave - Taft to Mill 2,570,000$ -$ 2,570,000$
CIP No. #2000570 - Sewer-main Replacements: Taft, Hathaway, Phillips, Buena Vista, and Loomis 330,000$ 330,000$
CIP No. #2000571 - Sewer-main Replacements: San Jose, Ramona, Monte Vista, and California -$ 310,000$ 310,000$
CIP No. #2001005 - Water Valve Cover Adjustments 285,000$ 35,000$ 320,000$
CIP No. #2001024 - Sewer Inflow and Infiltration Reduction 420,000$ 420,000$ 840,000$
CIP No. #2001025 - Sewer Utility Trench Repair 25,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$
CIP No. #2001040 - Waterline Replacement: Chorro - Highland to Meinecke 24-inch Pipeline Replacement 100,000$ -$ 100,000$
CIP No. #2001043 - Recycled Water Pump Station Maintenance 45,000$ 45,000$
CIP No. #2001050 - Sewer Lift Station Maintenance 400,000$ 400,000$
CIP No. #2001052 - Water Storage Tank Inspection and Cleaning 10,000$ 10,000$ 20,000$
CIP No. #2001053 - Waterline Abandonment & Connections 50,000$ 50,000$
CIP No. #2001055 - WRRF - Building Maintenance 150,000$ 150,000$
CIP No. #2001073 - Sewer Main Replacement: Oceanaire - Cayucos to Froom Rd 35,000$ 35,000$
CIP No. #2091219 - WRRF Upgrade 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$
CIP No. #2091506 - Groundwater Well Development Program [91506]2,250,000$ 2,250,000$
CIP No. #2091734 - Water Treatment Plant - Water Meter Replacement 54,800$ 82,000$ 136,800$
CIP No. #2001026 - WTP Major Maintenance 180,000$ 180,000$ 360,000$
CIP No. #2000077 - WRRF - Asset Replacement 475,000$ 295,000$ 770,000$
CIP No. #2000531 - Recycled Water and Ultraviolet Disinfection Maintenance (602)10,000$ 10,000$
CIP No. #2000542 - WTP Major Facility Maintenance 113,000$ 113,000$
CIP No. #2000551 - WRRF Power Cogeneration Upgrade 1,475,000$ 1,475,000$
CIP No. #2001004 - Water Distribution Utility Trench Repair 340,000$ 340,000$ 680,000$
CIP No. #2001041 - Water Treatment Plant - Filter Media Replacement and Underdrain Repairs 480,000$ 480,000$
CIP No. #2001042 - Sewer-main Replacement: Chorro - Boysen to Rougeot -$ 2,750,000$ 2,750,000$
CIP No. #2091368 - T-3 Water Storage Tank Replacement - High Pressure Zone 500,000$ 500,000$
A - General Plan Conformity CIP Project MatrixPage 15 of 90
Capital Imrovement Plan for the 2025-27 Financial Plan
GENP 0359-2025
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY MATRIX FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 2-Year Total
CIP No. #2091639 - Sewer Main Replacement: Chorro – Meinecke to Murray 260,000$ 260,000$
Water and Wastewater Management Element: The City will coordinate the opertion of the Salinas, Whale Rock, and Nacimiento
Reserviors to maximize available water resources. 130,000$ 980,000$ 1,110,000$
CIP No. #2001009 - Whale Rock Reservoir – Asset Replacement 40,000$ 20,000$ 60,000$
CIP No. #2001017 - Whale Rock Reservoir Transmission Pipeline Replacement 90,000$ 960,000$ 1,050,000$
Grand Total 45,412,702$ 39,900,596$ 85,313,298$
A - General Plan Conformity CIP Project MatrixPage 16 of 90
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION
DETERMINING GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE FOR THE 2025-27
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND THAT THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PER
SECTION 15262 WHICH EXCLUDES FEASIBILITY AND PLANNING
STUDIES FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public meeting in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
California, on May 28, 2025, for the purpose of reviewing the 2025-27 Capital
Improvement Plan for General Plan Conformity as required by California Government
Code Section 65401 (GENP-0359-2025); and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the
manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered all evidence and
recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of San Luis Obispo as follows:
Section 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the Commission makes the
following findings:
1. The 2025-27 Capital Improvement Plan is consistent with the General Plan.
Section 2. Environmental Review. The determination of conformity with the
General Plan is exempt from environmental review as a Sta tutory Exemption under
Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies (CEQA Guidelines Section 15262). Each
Project listed as part of the CIP will need future authorization and environmental review
prior to construction.
Page 17 of 90
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC-XXX-2025 Page 2
GENP-0359-2025 (CIP Conformance)
Section 3. Action. The Planning Commission does find and report that GENP-
0359-2025 conforms to the City of San Luis Obispo’s General Plan pursuant to California
Government Code Section 65401.
On motion by , seconded by ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
REFRAIN:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of May 28, 2025.
Tyler Corey, Secretary
Planning Commission
Page 18 of 90
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: 1236 MONTE VISTA PLACE (USE-0332-2025). RE-REVIEW OF AN
EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS
EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1236 Monte Vista Pl. BY: Mallory Patino, Assistant Planner
Phone Number: (805) 783-7704
FILE NUMBER: USE-0332-2025 Email: mpatino@slocity.org
APPLICANT: Delta Chi FROM: Tyler Corey, Deputy Director
REPRESENTATIVE: Jacob Zuckermandel, Fraternity President
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Draft Resolution to modify the Conditional Use Permit, based on updated
findings and subject to revised conditions of approval. The project is categorically exempt
from environmental review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
SITE DATA
Applicant
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
Zone
Site Area
Environmental
Determination
Delta Chi
High Density Residential
(HDR)
High-Density Residential
(R-4)
Approximately 0.66 acre
Categorically exempt from
environmental review
under CEQA Guidelines
Section 15301 (Existing
Facilities)
SUMMARY
On August 12, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Use Permit to allow a fraternity
(Kappa Sigma) at the multifamily apartment complex at 1236 Monte Vista Place. Delta
Chi (Applicant) has continued the use as a fraternity organization under the approved Use
Permit since moving into 1236 Monte Vista Place in 2012. Since the approval of this Use
Meeting Date: 5/28/2025
Item Number: 4a
Time Estimate: 45 minutes
Figure 1 – Project Site
Page 19 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Permit, a fraternity organization has resided at and utilized the property for fraternity
activities. Due to recent violations, the Community Development Director (Director) is
referring the existing Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission for re -review.
Re-review of the Conditional Use Permit may result in (a) added, modified, and/or
removed conditions of approval to allow continuation of the fraternity in a manner
compatible with existing and proposed uses in the vicinity; or (b) revocation if the required
findings cannot be made per Section 17.102.020(C)(7).
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Prior Conditional Use Permit Review and Approval
On August 12, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Use Permit, U106, to allow
the fraternity (Kappa Sigma) at the multifamily apartment complex at 1236 Monte Vista
Place (Attachment B – PC Resolution No. 5230-98). Approval of this Use Permit allowed
multiple two- and three-story multifamily structures comprising seven (7) two-bedrooms
units and 12 one-bedroom units to be used by the fraternity. The Use Permit limited
residents to a maximum of 35 people, and routine meetings or gatherings to a maximum
of 53 people. Delta Chi began residing at 1236 Monte Vista Place in 2012, continuing the
use of the site under the Use Permit as a fraternity organization. Since the approval of
this Use Permit, the project site has been used as a residence for fraternity activities.
1.2 History of Active Violations and Code Enforcement Actions
Unpermitted Construction
On November 2, 2021, a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e.,
courtesy warning) was issued due to unpermitted work to enclose balconies (upper story
decks) that were not habitable space to become sleeping areas or habitable space
(Attachment C – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s), dated November 2, 2021). Four
apartment units were noted as having unpermitted work done and requiring corrections.
Four building permit applications were submitted for the work to convert the spaces back
into decks; three (3) applications were submitted in October of 2022 and one (1)
application was submitted in December of 2023. Code Enforcement has been handling
the violation and following up with the property owner to resolve the issue. The fraternity
organization does not own the property. A private property owner leases the residences
to the fraternity but is ultimately responsible for correcting the violations from unpermitted
construction.
Use Permit Violations
Police Department Actions
Records indicate that the Police Department has issued three (3) citations for noise
violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present).
Of these three:
Page 20 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
One citation, issued on March 3, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation
was dismissed by a Police Department Hearing Officer based on a lack of
identifiable noise (music or other sounds) on the body camera footage of the
issuing Officer at the property line or at 50 feet from the property line.
Another of these citations was issued on March 15, 2025, the Saturday ahead of
St. Patrick’s Day (locally referred to as “St. Fratty’s Day” weekend), for a large
party occurring at 1236 Monte Vista Place. Code Enforcement conducted outreach
to fraternity organizations ahead of St. Patrick’s Day weekend to encourage safe
celebrations and deter unruly gatherings. The Police Department also conducted
outreach ahead of the weekend to inform residents in the neighborhoods around
Cal Poly about increased enforcement efforts for the weekend. The Police
Department invested substantial resources during this weekend to ensure public
safety of the neighborhood. Despite these efforts, an event still took place at 1236
Monte Vista Pl. that resulted in a noise violation citation.
Code Enforcement Actions
On March 19, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) /
Notice of Violation due to multiple, confirmed administrative citations, noise violations,
and Use Permit violations (Attachment D – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s), dated
March 19, 2025). After issuing this Notice, staff contacted the property owner, property
manager, and fraternity over the next several months to discuss these issues, including
the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission.
1.3 Planning Commission’s Purview
Due to active violations by the fraternity and on the property, the Director is referring the
Use Permit to the Planning Commission for re-review in accordance with Condition No.
11 of Use Permit, U106, which states the following:
11. Use permit shall be reviewed if any reasonable written citizen or Police or Fire
Department complaints are received by the city. In review of the use permit, the
Planning Commission may add, delete or modify conditions of approval, or revoke
the use permit. The Planning Commission may consider adding a condition
requiring fraternity officers to perform a community service project in the
neighborhood.
1.4 Changes to the Municipal Code
Since the approval of the Use Permit, U106, in 1998, it should be noted that there have
been codified changes to the Municipal Code that regulate fraternities and sororities.
These changes include updated findings and criteria for approval for fraternities and
sororities, as well as code requirements that directly address concerns regarding noise,
public disturbances, and other disorderly conduct, as summarized below.
Page 21 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Requirements for Approval
Per Table 2-1 of the Municipal Code (Uses Allowed by Zone), the establishment of a
fraternity in the R-4 zone requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Approval of a
Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity is subject to the requirements, listed below, to
ensure its consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Regulations and its compatibility
with existing and future land uses in the vicinity:
Section 17.110.060 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits – Criteria for
Approval)
Section 17.110.070 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits – Required
Findings)
Section 17.86.130(B) (Fraternities and Sororities – Required Findings)
The Planning Commission’s role is to consider the above -discussed violations and
determine what modifications, if any, to the Use Permit conditions are necessary for the
Planning Commission to make the required findings for continued use of the property as
a fraternity.
Standard Conditions for Fraternities
Standard conditions for fraternities and sororities, outlined in Section 17.86.130(A)
(Fraternities and Sororities – Applicability), were established as part of the comprehensive
update to Title 17 (Zoning Regulations) in 2018. These standard conditions limit the
number of permitted residents, regulate the number of attendees f or meetings and
gatherings, require affiliation and good standing with the university, and establish a
responsible contact for the fraternity.
Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals, and Welfare) Updates
Since 1998, there have been incremental improvements as codif ied changes to Title 9
(Public Peace, Morals, and Welfare) that directly address concerns regarding noise,
public disturbances, and other disorderly conduct, regardless of a Use Permit approval.
These code requirements apply to all uses in the City, and the key chapters that apply to
fraternity activities are identified below:
Chapter 9.12 (Noise Control)
o Ordinance adopted in 1985, latest revision in 2010
Chapter 9.13 (Unruly Gatherings)
o Ordinance adopted in 2010, revised in 2015
Chapter 9.22 (Safety Enhancement Zones)
o Ordinance adopted in 2004, latest revision in 2024
Page 22 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
2.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
Staff evaluated the fraternity and its violations against current standards and regulations,
including the updated findings and criteria for approval as well as code requirements. At
this time, staff recommends the Planning Commission allow continuation of the fraternity
subject to a modified Use Permit, instead of revocation of the Use Permit. Updated
findings and revised conditions are recommended based on the following analysis. The
re-review, and any subsequent changes to the conditions of approval, are documented
as part of an updated Conditional Use Permit, USE-0332-2025, application.
2.1 Consistency with the General Plan / Zoning Regulations
The project is consistent with the intent of both the High-Density Residential land use
designation and zone, which allow dense housing in proximity to concentrations of
employment and college enrollment. In addition, the project would advance Land Use
Element Policy 2.6.5 (Fraternities & Sororities) and Housing Element Policy 8.5 (Special
Housing Needs) by locating a fraternity in a High-Density residential area within 0.1-mile
of Cal Poly SLO campus.
Fraternity Use – Standard Conditions
As outlined in Section 17.86.130(A) (Fraternities and Sororities – Applicability), standard
conditions shall apply to the fraternity, as follows:
Number of Residents – Occupancy shall be limited to not more than one (1)
resident per 60 square feet of building area. The landlord shall allow the City to
verify occupancy by allowing an inspection of the records or a visual inspection of
the premises. Any inspection shall be at a reasonable time and shall be preced ed
by a 24-hour notice to the residents.
The project site contains an existing multi-family apartment complex with a total of
approximately 13,764 square feet and 26 bedrooms. The fraternity shall be limited
to a maximum of 35 residents (approximately 393 square feet per resident),
consistent with the prior Use Permit approval. The proposed maximum occupancy
allows for 17 bedrooms to each house one (1) resident, and nine (9) bedrooms to
be shared by two (2) residents (Condition No. 3). The property owner shall also
allow the City to verify occupancy by allowing an inspection of records or visual
inspection of the premises at a reasonable time with at least 24-hour notice to the
residents (Condition No. 3).
Routine Gatherings – The maximum number of persons allowed on site for routine
meetings and gatherings shall not exceed the limit established by the applicable
Conditional Use Permit.
Prior approvals of Conditional Use Permits to establish fraternities/sororities have
limited the number of people onsite for routine meetings and gatherings to 1.5
times the number of average population density. This calculation takes into
consideration the number of residents, areas inside buildings, and number of
parking spaces available in the vicinity.
Page 23 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Per Table 4 (Residential Population Assumptions) of the Land Use Element, the
High Density Residential (HDR) land use designation, which corresponds to the R-
4 zone where fraternities may be permitted, has an average population density of
55 people per acre. The project site a t 1236 Monte Vista Place is approximately
0.66-acre in size, which results in an average of 36.3 people for the property.
Based on past practice, including recent City Council and Planning Commission
actions, the maximum number of people for routine meetings and gatherings for
this fraternity shall be limited to 54 people (rounded down from 54.45 = 36.3 people
x 1.5) (Condition No. 4). This proposed condition includes a slight increase of one
(1) person from the 53 people allowed for routine gatherings unde r the original
approval of Use Permit, U106 (Condition No. 4 of Resolution No. 5230-98), but
would align with current practice of calculating gathering limits to provide
consistency across all fraternity and sorority use permits.
University Affiliation – The fraternity or sorority shall remain affiliated and in good
standing with the Interfraternity Council of Student Life and Leadership at
California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. If the fraternity or sorority
becomes unaffiliated or no longer held in good standing with California Polytechnic
University, the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked.
The fraternity shall remain affiliated and in good standing with the Interfraternity
Council of Student Life and Leadership at California Polytechnic University, San
Luis Obispo. If the fraternity becomes unaffiliated or is no longer in good standing,
the Conditional Use Permit shall be automatically revoked (Condition No. 5).
Contact Information – The landlord shall provide names and telephone numbers
of responsible persons to the Community Development Department and
Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an annual basis.
Responsible persons shall be available during all events and at reasonable hours
to receive and handle complaints.
The fraternity shall provide the name and contact information (i.e., phone number
and email address) of all responsible parties to the Community Development
Department and Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an
annual basis. If there is a change to the name and/or contact information of any
responsible parties, the Community Development Department and Neighborhood
Services Manager shall be notified immediately. The “responsible parties” are
those that cause, maintain, allow, or are otherwise responsible for actions
regulated by this Use Permit, or those that have an ownership interest in the real
property (Condition No. 6).
Page 24 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Parking Requirements
Per Table 3-4 (Parking Requirements by Use) in Section 17.72.030 (Required parking
spaces), a fraternity is required to provide one (1) space per 1.5 occupants or 1.5 spaces
per bedroom, whichever is greater. With a total of 35 residents and 26 bedrooms, the
fraternity would be required to provide 39 spaces (i.e., the greater calculation based on
bedroom count) under the current parking requirement. It is noted that a minimum of 32
spaces were required as part of the original Use Permit approval (Condition No. 2 of
Resolution No. 5230-98), which is consistent with the parking space capacity of the
apartment complex. Since there is no additional development (i.e., new construction or
addition) or change in use proposed as part of this re-review per Section 17.72.060
(Nonconforming Parking), the fraternity use may continue by maintaining a
nonconforming number of 32 spaces onsite (Condition No. 8).
To facilitate the use of active transportation and address potential impacts on street
parking by the fraternity, a minimum of 35 bicycle parking spaces (one bicycle space per
bed), consistent with current requirements for 35 residents in Table 3-6 (Required Bicycle
Parking) of Section 17.72.070 (Bicycle parking standards), shall be required (Condition
No. 9). This condition would increase the number of bicycle spaces from 10 to 35 for the
site.
2.2 Conditions to Address Noise and Large Gatherings
Based on recent noise violations, staff recommends the following new conditions, which
are consistent with language in more recent use permit fraternity conditions, to address
concerns related to noise and large gatherings:
Condition No. 2 establishes a clear threshold for re-reviews should future violations
occur. The condition requires the Planning Commission to re -evaluate the Use
Permit if the fraternity receives three (3) citations within any 12-month period for a
violation of law or permit condition that (a) are not contested or are upheld on
appeal, and (b) the conduct for which the citations were issued resulted in adverse
impacts to, or complaints from, residents or occupants of the surrounding
neighborhood.
o Note – This condition would replace procedures for handling complaints and
re-reviews identified in Conditions No. 11 of the original Use Permit, U106.
Condition No. 4 limits routine meetings and gatherings to 54 people. Any event
that includes more than 54 people is considered a special event and will require a
separate, follow-up application for more detailed review.
o Note – This condition would address concerns related to large gatherings
and replace Conditions No. 4, 5, and 7 of the original Use Permit, U106.
Condition No. 10 includes an extended range of hours between 10:00 p.m. and
9:00 a.m. (instead of only between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. as required by the
Municipal Code) for regular compliance with a lower exterior noise limit.
Page 25 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
o Note – This condition would directly address noise concerns and replace
Condition No. 5 of the original Use Permit, U106. It should be noted that
people in private residences (e.g., residents of the fraternity) are legally
allowed to gather and meet with guests without government interference
into their private residences, relationships, and associations, provided that
the number and conduct of those residents and guests conform to
applicable regulations. Due to constitutional concerns with placing a
condition that limits the type of people in private residences (i.e., residents
vs. non-residents), Condition No. 10 was written to directly address noise
concerns related to the fraternity use by identifying an extended range of
hours between 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. for regular compliance with a lower
exterior noise limit.
Condition No. 11 requires that the fraternity establish and maintain ongoing
communication with its neighbors in the vicinity.
o Note – This condition would address concerns related to neighborhood
relations and replace Condition No. 6 of the original Use Permit, U106.
Condition No. 12 states that amplified noise-generating activities are prohibited.
Conditions No. 4, 11, and 12 clarify that any requested exceptions from the Noise
Ordinance will not be approved by the Director.
2.3 Other Proposed Changes to the Conditions
As part of the re-review, staff recommends revising the conditions to (a) reflect updated
language for consistency with more recent approvals and (b) identify the necessary
corrective actions based on current violations.
Other Conditions with Updated Language
Limitations and/or requirements detailed in Conditions No. 1, 2, 3, and 12 of the original
Use Permit, U106, regulate the number of residents and parking spaces, require routine
property maintenance, and clarify the grounds for revocation. These requi rements are
addressed as updated conditions and have been incorporated as recommended
Conditions No. 3, 7, 8, and 14 in the re-review.
Conditions Proposed for Removal
Conditions No. 8, 9, and 10 of the original Use Permit, U106, pertain to property
improvements (e.g., permitting signage, landscaping, and trash enclosure area) that have
been satisfied as part of the initial review. Therefore, these conditions have been r emoved
from the recommended conditions of this re-review. It is also noted that these aspects of
the property, including any future proposed changes, would continue to be regulated by
Municipal Code standards related to signage and general maintenance.
Page 26 of 90
Item 4a
USE-0332-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Proposed New Condition
To comply with the provisions of Title 15 Buildings and Construction, Condition No. 13
was added to address the violations regarding the unpe rmitted conversion of non-
habitable space (e.g., balconies and decks) to sleeping areas. The c ondition includes an
expected time frame for work to be completed – six (6) months following the May 28, 2025
Planning Commission re-review hearing or prior to leasing the affected residential units
to new tenants for the next academic year. It has been more than three years since Code
Enforcement provided the property owner with notice of the violations, yet the four units
remain in their unpermitted status. The provided time frame requires corrections to be
completed sooner, rather than allowing fraternity members to continue living in
unpermitted and potentially unsafe conditions.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities)
of the CEQA Guidelines because it includes the continued operation and permitting of an
existing residential use (i.e., fraternity) with revised findings and conditions of approval.
The project does not include construction of a new building or additional building square
footage. Therefore, the project involves no expansion of the existing residential use.
4.0 ALTERNATIVES
1. Continue review of the Conditional Use Permit. An action to continue review of the
Conditional Use Permit should include a detailed list of additional information or
analysis required to make a decision regarding added, modified, and/or removed
conditions.
2. Revoke the Conditional Use Permit. An action to revoke the Conditional Use
Permit should include findings that cite the basis for revocation and reference
inconsistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, and other policy
documents.
5.0 ATTACHMENTS
A. Draft PC Resolution (USE-0332-2025)
B. PC Resolution No. 5230-98 (Approval of the Original Use Permit, U106)
C. Notice to Correct Code Violation(s), dated November 2, 2021
D. Notice to Correct Code Violation(s), dated March 19, 2025
Page 27 of 90
Page 28 of 90
RESOLUTION NO. PC-XXXX-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO AN EXISTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONTINUATION OF A
FRATERNITY AT 1236 MONTE VISTA PLACE. THE PROJECT IS
EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15301
(EXISTING FACILITIES) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES AS REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF
REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED MAY 28, 2025 (USE-0332-2025)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on August 12, 1998,
for the review of a Use Permit to allow a fraternity (Kappa Sigma) at 1236 Monte Vista
Place (Resolution No. 5230-98 (1998 Series)); and
WHEREAS, after Kappa Sigma vacated the project site, Delta Chi began residing
at the project site in 2012 and continued the use as a fraternity organization under the
provisions of Use Permit, U106; and
WHEREAS, the City received complaints, and the Police Department issued
three citations relating to noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic year
(September 2024 to present, May 2025) and Code Enforcement issued a Notice of
Violation in March 2025 relating to the multiple, verified violations of the existing Use
Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 28, 2025,
for the re-review of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity at
1236 Monte Vista Place, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under USE-0332-2025; Delta
Chi, applicant; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the Planning Commission considered all
evidence, including documented violations, testimony of the applicant and general public
and evaluation, and recommendations by staff; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the
manner required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The Planning Commission hereby approves the Conditional Use
Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity (USE-0332-2025), based on the following
revised findings:
Page 29 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 2
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed fraternity is
an allowable use as dense group housing in the High Density Residential (HDR)
land use designation. In addition, the project would facilitate Land Use Element
Policy 2.6.5 and Housing Element Policy 8.6 by locating a fraternity in proximity to
the Cal Poly SLO campus and other student-oriented uses and housing.
2. The proposed fraternity is conditionally allowed within the High-Density Residential
(R-4) zone. As conditioned, the project complies with applicable provisions of the
Zoning Regulations because (a) the maximum number of 35 residents complies
with the group housing maximum occupancy limits, (b) the parking configuration
would provide 32 required spaces, consistent with the nonconforming parking
space capacity of the apartment complex per Section 17.72.060 of the San Luis
Obispo Municipal Code (Nonconforming Parking), and (c) the required 35 bicycle
parking spaces complies with current bicycle parking requirements per Section
17.72.070 (Bicycle parking standards).
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the project will be
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity because the
proposed fraternity would continue to (a) be in proximity to other dense group
housing (i.e., other fraternities, sororities, multi-family, etc.), (b) be located within
walking distance (i.e., within 0.1-mile) of the Cal Poly campus, and (c) utilize an
existing developed multi-family property.
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of (a) its design, location, shape, size, and
operating characteristics of the project; (b) traffic generation and the provision of
public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access; (c) public protection
services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and (d) the provision of
utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm
drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.). The project is
surrounded by other developed properties with compatible dense housing uses,
has access to the City’s circulation system, and is served by City utilities. The
project utilizes an existing developed multi-family property and does not include
activities that would generate service or utility demands beyond those anticipated
with uses permitted in the vicinity.
5. As conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare
of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because conditions have
been included that place limits on the number of persons allowed on site, restrict
activities, provide adequate parking, and limit potential disturbances to neighboring
properties. The project will be compatible with the existing site constraints and the
character of the neighborhood.
Page 30 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 3
6. As conditioned, the establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the
project will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public
or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental
or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use because the
project includes conditions that (a) place limits on the number of persons allowed
on site, (b) restrict activities, (c) provide adequate parking, and (d) limit potential
disturbances to neighboring properties. The project would be compatible with the
existing site constraints and the character of the neighborhood.
SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental
review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines because it
includes the continued operation and permitting of an existing residential use. (i.e.,
fraternity) with revised conditions of approval. The project does not include the
construction of a new building or additional building square footage. Therefore, the project
involves no expansion of the former residential use.
SECTION 3. Action. The Planning Commission hereby approves the Conditional
Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity (USE -0332-2025), based on the
following revised conditions:
Planning Division – Community Development Department
1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Community Development
Director for compliance with the conditions of approval, or to determine whether a
modification of the Conditional Use Permit is necessary upon significant change
to the project as represented in the Staff Report dated May 28, 2025, or in the
event of a change in ownership which may result in deviation from the project
description or approved plans.
2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as
soon as practical if conduct on the permitted premises results in three (3) citations
within any 12-month period for a violation of law or permit condition that (a) are
not contested or are upheld on appeal, and (b) the conduct for which the citations
were issued resulted in adverse impacts to, or complaints from, residents or
occupants of the surrounding neighborhood. At the time of the Conditional Use
Permit review, to ensure ongoing compatibility with nearby uses, conditions of
approval may be added, modified, and/or removed, or the Conditional Use Permit
may be revoked. The City shall notify Cal Poly if the Use Permit is revoked. A re -
review by the Planning Commission shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee.
3. The fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 35 residents for the property. The
property owner shall allow the City to verify the maximum occupancy by allowing
an inspection of records or visual inspection of the premises. Any inspection shall
be scheduled at a reasonable time with at least 24-hour notice to the residents.
Page 31 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 4
4. Routine meetings and gatherings for the fraternity shall be limited to a maximum
of 54 people (rounded down from 54.45 = 36.3 people x 1.5), except as otherwise
approved by the Community Development Director for special events. If the
fraternity hosts special events involving more than 54 people, a transportation
management plan to reduce impacts to the surrounding neighborhood shall be
submitted to the Community Development Department , at least 30 days prior to
the event taking place, for review and approval. No exception from the Noise
Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as Part of the special event.
Presence of more than 54 people at the property without valid approval from the
Community Development Director shall be considered a violation of this
Conditional Use Permit.
5. The fraternity shall remain affiliated and in good standing with the Interfraternity
Council of Student Life and Leadership at California Polytechnic Universit y, San
Luis Obispo. If the fraternity becomes unaffiliated or is no longer in good standing,
the Conditional Use Permit shall be automatically revoked.
6. The fraternity shall provide the name and contact information (i.e., phone number
and email address) of all responsible parties to the Community Development
Department and Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an
annual basis. If there is a change to the name and/or contact information of any
responsible parties, the Community Development Department and Neighborhood
Services Manager shall be notified immediately. The “responsible parties” are
those that cause, maintain, allow, or are otherwise responsible for actions
regulated by this Use Permit, or those that have an ownership interest i n the real
property.
7. The property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner and in compliance
with the Municipal Code. All landscaping shall be replaced as necessary and
maintained (e.g., trimmed, pruned, etc.) to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director.
8. A minimum of 32 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained at all times.
These spaces shall remain available to residents of the fraternity and not
designated for any individuals not residing on the property.
9. Within 60 days of the re-review hearing with the Planning Commission on May 28,
2025, the fraternity shall install a minimum of 35 bicycle spaces (one for each
resident) and contact the City for a follow-up inspection to verify that all required
bicycle spaces have been installed.
10. The fraternity use shall comply with Table 1 (Exterior Noise Limits) of Section
9.12.060 (Exterior Noise Limits) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code between
the extended hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m.
Page 32 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 5
11. Prior to a special event approved by the Community Development Director
pursuant to Condition No. 4, the fraternity shall provide written notification of the
event to all occupants residing within 300 feet of the site. The written notification
shall include the date, hours, and contact information for the responsible party for
the special event. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by
the Director as part of the special event.
12. Live entertainment, bands, and/or amplified sounds are prohibi ted, unless
otherwise approved through a special event by the Community Development
Department. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the
Director as part of the special event.
13. Unless otherwise approved by the Community Development Director, the building
permits to resolve the open code enforcement case regarding unpermitted
conversion of non-habitable space (e.g., balconies, decks, and sunrooms) to
sleeping areas shall be finaled within six (6) months following the May 28, 2025
Planning Commission re-review hearing or prior to leasing the affected residential
units to new tenants for the next academic year, whichever occurs first. Failure to
complete the required work to resolve the open code enforcement case within the
preceding timeframe shall result in the automatic revocation of this Conditional
Use Permit.
14. Failure to comply with any of the above conditions or code requirements, or the
conduct of the use so as to constitute a violation of Federal, State, or local law, or
so as to constitute a public nuisance or so as to cause adverse impacts on the
health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and
considered a violation of this Conditional Use Permit and may constitute grounds
for the revocation of this permit.
Page 33 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 6
Effect of Resolution
This Resolution repeals and replaces Resolution No. 5230-98 (1998 Series). The
Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of a fraternity at 1236 Monte Vista Place
is subject to the revised conditions stated in this Resolution.
Indemnification
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and/or its
agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding agai nst the
City and/or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul,
the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including
but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with
the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an
Indemnified Claim.
On motion by Commissioner ______, seconded by Commissioner ______, and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
RECUSED:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 28th day of May 2025.
___________________
Tyler Corey, Secretary
Planning Commission
Page 34 of 90
Page 35 of 90
Page 36 of 90
Page 37 of 90
Page 38 of 90
Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation
(Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation)
November 2, 2021
Kimberly J Ernst
PO Box 4616
Santa Clara, CA 95056
SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1236 Monte Vista Place #16,18,19, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-071-028
Code Case #: CODE-610-2021
Dear Property Owner,
On October 25, 2021, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following
violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address:
1. Permit Required (SLOMC 15.02.010, California Residential Code 105.1)
“Any owner or owner’s authorized agent who intends to construct, enlarge, alter, repair,
move, demolish or change the occupancy of a building or structure, or to erect, install,
enlarge, alter, repair, remove, convert or replace any electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing
system, the installation of which is regulated by this code, or to cause any such work to be
performed, shall first make application to the building official and obtain the required
permit.”
2. Improper Occupancy (SLOMC 15.02.010, Uniform Housing Code 1001.14)
“All buildings or portions there-of occupied for living, sleeping, cooking or dining purposes
that were not designed or intended to be used for such occupancies shall be considered
substandard.”
During the annual Fire Inspection, it was discovered that the deck of units 16, 18 and 19 have been
enclosed and are being used as sleeping areas. This was done without permits and is not habitable space.
Please contact our Planning Department at 805-781-7170 to determine if the space can be permitted as a
sleeping area. If not, a demo permit will be required to return the decks to their allowed use. Use of the
space shall cease immediately.
ALL REQUIRED WORK MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE.
We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s) no later than December 2,
2021. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) by the
specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance
with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an
Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies.
Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the
enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via
email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of
this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review.
Page 39 of 90
We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your effort s to
maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions,
please contact the undersigned Officer at (805) 783-7841 or ssheats@slocity.org.
Sincerely,
____________________________
Steve Sheats, Code Enforcement Officer
Cc: File
Enclosures: Request for Directors Review
Page 40 of 90
Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation
(Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation)
March 19, 2025
Michael Ernst
PO BOX 4616
Santa Clara, CA 95056
SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1236 Monte Vista Pl San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-071-028
Code Case #: CODE-000086-2025
Dear Property Owner,
City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address:
1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC §17.76.060)
“It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing,
occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property
in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon:
1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned
development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement
or land use permit.”
Conditions number four, five, six, and seven of the use permit associated with the property indicate that:
“4. The maximum number of persons allowed on the site for routine meetings an gatherings is 53, except
as specifically approved by the Community Development Director for special events. For such special
events, the applicant shall also submit a parking and transportation plan.
5. No meetings, parties, or other types of similar activities involving persons other than residents are
allowed between the hours of 10 PM and 9 AM, except as approved by the Commun ity Development
Director.
6. The applicant shall institute and maintain a neighborhood relations program. This plan shall include at
least the following elements:
*Annual training of all members in community relations.
*A program to inform neighbors of upcoming events at the house.
*Submission of names and telephone numbers of responsible persons, including alumni president and
chief financial officer, to the Community Development and to the neighbors within two blocks of the
house. Responsible person shall be available during all events and at reasonable hours otherwise, to
receive and handle complaints.
*Evidence of implementation of said plan shall be submitted to the director for review each year. Failure
to exercise reasonable efforts to implement said plan may be grounds for revocation of this permit
Page 41 of 90
7. Events, including meetings or parties, on site, shall be limited to those listed on a meeting and activities
schedule, submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director in the fall of each year.
Exceptions to this schedule must be approved by the Community Development Director. If the Director
determines the change is significant and may have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, then it will be
referred to the Planning Commission for consideration.”
There are multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police contacts between
01/01/2025 and 03/03/2025. Code enforcement staff will be recommending review of the use permit to
the Deputy Director of Community Development. A determination made by the Deputy Director that the
evidence submitted warrants review, modification, or revocation of the current use permit by the Planning
Commission will be followed by notification to the property owner and other responsible parties.
We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s). Immediate
compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to
correct the violation(s) by the specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation
requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations
that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by
other civil or criminal remedies.
Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by
completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community
Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely
file a Request for Director’s Review.
We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your
efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you
have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org.
Sincerely,
RAMI SALEM
Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator
Cc: File
Enclosures: Request for Directors Review
Page 42 of 90
Page 43 of 90
Page 44 of 90
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: 1304 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 190 CRANDALL WAY (USE-0333-
2025). RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A
FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
PROJECT ADDRESSES: 1304 Foothill Boulevard and 190 Crandall Way
FILE NUMBER: USE-0333-2025 BY: Mallory Patino, Assistant Planner
Phone Number: (805) 783-7704
Email: mpatino@slocity.org
APPLICANT: Sigma Nu FROM: Tyler Corey, Deputy Director
REPRESENTATIVE: Charlie Minor, Fraternity Eminent Commander
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Draft Resolution to modify the Conditional Use Permit, based on updated
findings and subject to revised conditions of approval. The project is categorically exempt
from environmental review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
SITE DATA
Applicant
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
Zone
Site Area
Environmental
Determination
Sigma Nu
High Density Residential
(HDR)
High-Density Residential
(R-4)
Approximately 0.26 acre
Categorically exempt from
environmental review
under CEQA Guidelines
Section 15301 (Existing
Facilities)
SUMMARY
On May 14, 1990, Sigma Nu (Applicant) obtained approval of a Use Permit to allow their
fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard. Annual re-reviews of the Use Permit were conducted
in each of the two subsequent years, on May 8, 1991 and October 19, 1992, which
Meeting Date: 5/28/2025
Item Number: 4b
Time Estimate: 45 minutes
Figure 1 – Project Site
Page 45 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
resulted in revised conditions after each re-review. The Applicant has resided and utilized
the property for fraternity activities since the initial approval of, and subsequent
modifications to, this Use Permit. Due to recent noise violations, the Communi ty
Development Director (Director) is referring the existing Conditional Use Permit to the
Planning Commission for a re-review. Re-review of the Conditional Use Permit may result
in (a) added, modified, and/or removed conditions of approval to allow contin uation of the
fraternity in a manner compatible with existing and proposed uses in the vicinity; or (b)
revocation if the required findings cannot be made.
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Prior Conditional Use Permit Review and Approval
On May 14, 1990, the Planning Commission approved the Use Permit, U1484, to allow
the fraternity (Sigma Nu) at 1304 Foothill Boulevard (Attachment B – PC Resolution No.
5017-90). Approval of this Use Permit included a limited fraternity with routine activities
confined to the residence addressed 1304 Foothill, with other units on the property only
for residential use1, and did not allow onsite special events as those were proposed to be
held off-site (e.g., Cal Poly campus and various halls or venues such as the Monday Club
and Embassy Suites) at the time. This approval included a condition for a re -review
following the first year of activities (Condition No. 13 of PC Resolution No. 5017 -90).
On May 8, 1991, the Planning Commission reviewed the Use Permit after the fraternity’s
first year of activities and approved its continuation, subject to revised conditions
(Attachment C – PC Resolution No. 5055-91). Approval of this modification to the Use
Permit included revised conditions that (a) increase the number of people in routine
gatherings from 16 to 19; (b) allow specific small-scale events with a maximum of 38
attendees; and (c) require a re-review following the second year of activities (Conditions
No. 3, 11, and 13, respectively, of PC Resolution No. 5055-91).
On October 14, 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed the Use Permit after the
fraternity’s second year of activities and approved its continuation, subject to revised
conditions (Attachment D – PC Resolution No. 5111-92). Approval of this modification to
the Use Permit included the elimination of conditions related to (a) signage parameters
to allow minor changes and (b) subsequent annual reviews because of demonstrated
good behavior in the initial two (2) years (Condition No. 6 and 13, respectively, of PC
Resolution No. 5055-91).
The Use Permit authorizes re-review by the Planning Commission on an as-needed basis
if staff receive complaints from the public or from the Police or Fire departments
(Condition No. 4 of PC Resolution No. 5055-91).
Since the initial approval of, and subsequent modifications to, this Use Permit, the
Applicant has used the project site as a fraternity residence and for their fraternity
activities.
1 The original Use Permit limits the location of fraternity activities (e.g., gatherings and meetings)
to the residence addressed 1304 Foothill Boulevard, but notes that the rest of the apartment units
addressed 190 Crandall Way Units 1-5 on the property are leased to fraternity members for
residential purposes. As such, fraternity members are housed throughout all units on the property.
Page 46 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
1.2 Prior General Plan Amendment and Rezone Review and Approval
On October 7, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1521 (2008 Series), which
included a General Plan Amendment and Rezone (GP/R 200 -07) to change the land use
designation and zone of several properties along Crandall Way and Foothill Boulevard,
including the project site, from Medium-High Residential (MHDR, R-3) to High Density
Residential (HDR, R-4). This was part of a larger amendment/rezoning effort in tended to
increase density potential and facilitate group housing uses (e.g., student housing
projects, fraternities and sororities, etc.) in proximity to Cal Poly campus. The
amendment/rezoning would support viable redevelopment of properties consistent with
policies in the Land Use Element and Housing Element to provide housing that attracts
and locates faculty and students closer to campus and reduce commute travel.
1.3 History of Recent Violations and Code Enforcement Actions
Use Permit Violations
Police Department Actions
Records indicate that the Police Department has issued four (4) citations for noise
violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present).
Code Enforcement Actions
On January 8, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) /
Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple, confirmed administrative
citations, noise violations, and Use Permit violations (Attachment E – Notice to Correct
Code Violation(s), dated January 8, 2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued an
Administrative Citation (in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit
on April 2, 2025 (Attachment F – Administrative Citation, dated April 2, 2025). After issuing
the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citation, staff contacted the property owner,
property manager, and fraternity over the next several months to discuss these issues,
including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission.
1.4 Planning Commission’s Purview
The multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police calls
associated with the fraternity have resulted in violations of Condition No. 8 of the Use
Permit, U1484, which is as follows:
8. Failure to comply with any of the above conditions or code requirements, or the
conduct of the use so as to constitute a public nuisance or so as to cause adverse
impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use, is
prohibited and may constitute grounds for revocation of this permit.
In accordance with Condition No. 4, the Director is referring the Use Permit for a re-review
by the Planning Commission as detailed below:
Page 47 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
4. If a reasonable complaint is received in writing by the Community Development
Department,
a. The complaint shall be forwarded to the Interfraternity Council and the
Planning Commission within one week of receipt for review and
comment. The names of the people filing the complaint shall not be
included without their consent. Copies of all correspondence will be sent
to the Dean of Students and the fraternity.
b. The complaint, and the comments from the Interfraternity Council if
received, shall be forwarded by the Planning Division to the Planning
Commission for consideration at the commission’s next available
meeting.
1.5 Changes to the Municipal Code
Since the original approval of, and subsequent modifications to, Use Permit, U1484, in
1990-1992, it should be noted that there have been codified changes to the Municipal
Code that regulate fraternities and sororities. These changes include updated findings
and criteria for approval for fraternities, as well as generally-applicable code requirements
that directly address concerns regarding noise, public disturbances, and other disorderly
conduct, as summarized below.
Requirements for Approval
Per Table 2-1 of the Municipal Code (Uses Allowed by Zone), the establishment of a
fraternity in the R-4 zone requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Approval of a
Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity is subject to the requirements, listed below, to
ensure its consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Regulations and its compatibility
with existing and future land uses in the vicinity:
Section 17.110.060 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits – Criteria for
Approval)
Section 17.110.070 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits – Required
Findings)
Section 17.86.130(B) (Fraternities and Sororities – Required Findings)
The Planning Commission’s role is to consider the above -discussed violations and
determine what modifications, if any, to the Use Permit conditions are necessary for the
Planning Commission to make the required findings for continued use of the property as
a fraternity.
Standard Conditions for Fraternities
Standard conditions for fraternities and sororities, outlined in Section 17.86.130(A)
(Fraternities and Sororities – Applicability), were established as part of the comprehensive
update to Title 17 (Zoning Regulations) in 2018. These standard conditions limit the
number of permitted residents, regulate the number of attendees for meetings and
gatherings, require affiliation and good standing with the university, and establish a
responsible contact for the fraternity.
Page 48 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals, and Welfare) Updates
Since 1992, there have been incremental improvements as codified changes to Title 9
(Public Peace, Morals, and Welfare) that directly address concerns regarding noise,
public disturbances, and other disorderly conduct, regardless of a Use Permit approval.
These code requirements apply to all uses and conduct in the City, and the key chapters
that often apply to fraternity activities are identified below:
Chapter 9.12 (Noise Control)
o Ordinance adopted in 1985, latest revision in 2010
Chapter 9.13 (Unruly Gatherings)
o Ordinance adopted in 2010, revised in 2015
Chapter 9.22 (Safety Enhancement Zones)
o Ordinance adopted in 2004, latest revision in 2024
2.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
Staff evaluated the fraternity and its violations against current standards and regulations,
including the updated findings and criteria for approval as well as code requirements. At
this time, staff recommends the Planning Commission allow continuation of the fraternity
subject to a modified Use Permit, instead of revocation of the Use Permit. Updated
findings and revised conditions are recommended based on the following analysis. The
re-review, and any subsequent changes to the conditions of approval, are documented
as part of an updated Conditional Use Permit, USE-0333-2025, application.
2.1 Consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Regulations
The project is consistent with the intent of both the High -Density Residential land use
designation and zone, which allow dense housing in proximity to concentrations of
employment and college enrollment. In addition, the project would advance Land Use
Element Policy 2.6.5 (Fraternities & Sororities) and Housing Element Policy 8.5 (Special
Housing Needs) by locating a fraternity in a High-Density residential area within 0.1-mile
of Cal Poly SLO campus.
Fraternity Use – Standard Conditions
As outlined in Section 17.86.130(A) (Fraternities and Sororities – Applicability), standard
conditions shall apply to the fraternity, as follows:
Number of Residents – Occupancy shall be limited to not more than one (1)
resident per 60 square feet of building area. The landlord shall allow the City to
verify occupancy by allowing an inspection of the records or a visual inspection of
the premises. Any inspection shall be at a reasonable time and shall be preceded
by a 24-hour notice to the residents.
Page 49 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
The project site contains three (3) residential structures (two apartment structures
and one single-family structure) with a combined total of approximately 5,077
square feet and 12 bedrooms. The fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 19
residents (approximately 267 square feet per resident), consistent with the prior
Use Permit approval, because it is anticipated that most of the 12 bedrooms would
be shared between two (2) residents while some may be used by single residents
(Condition No. 3). The property owner shall also allow the City to verify occupancy
by allowing an inspection of records or visual inspection of the premises at a
reasonable time with at least 24-hour notice to the residents (Condition No. 3). This
revision would replace Condition No. 1 of the old Use Permit.
Routine Gatherings – The maximum number of persons allowed on site for routine
meetings and gatherings shall not exceed the limit establish ed by the applicable
Conditional Use Permit.
Prior approvals of Conditional Use Permits to establish fraternities/sororities have
limited the number of people onsite for routine meetings and gatherings to 1.5
times the number of average population density. This calculation takes into
consideration the number of residents, areas inside buildings, and number of
parking spaces available in the vicinity.
Per Table 4 (Residential Population Assumptions) of the Land Use Element, the
High Density Residential (HDR) land use designation, which corresponds to the R-
4 zone where fraternities may be permitted, has an average population density of
55 people per acre. The project site at 1304 Foothill Blvd / 190 Crandall Way is
approximately 0.26-acre in size, which results in an average of 14.3 people for the
property. The maximum number of people for routine meetings and gatherings for
this fraternity shall be limited to 21 people (rounded down from 21.45 = 14.3 people
x 1.5) (Condition No. 4). This proposed condition includes a slight increase of two
(2) people from the 19 people allowed for routine gatherings under the original
approval of Use Permit, U1484 (Condition No. 3 of Resolution No. 5111-92), but
would align with current practice of calculating gathering limits to provide
consistency across all fraternity and sorority use permits .
University Affiliation – The fraternity or sorority shall remain affiliated and in good
standing with the Interfraternity Council of Student Life and Leadership at
California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. If the fraternity or sorority
becomes unaffiliated or no longer held in good standing with California Polytechnic
University, the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked.
The fraternity shall remain affiliated and in good standing with the Interfraternity
Council of Student Life and Leadership at California Polytechnic University, San
Luis Obispo. If the fraternity becomes unaffiliated or is no longer in good standing,
the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked (Condition No. 5).
Page 50 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Contact Information – The landlord shall provide names and telephone numbers
of responsible persons to the Community Development Department and
Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an annual basis.
Responsible persons shall be available during all events and at reasonable hours
to receive and handle complaints.
The fraternity shall provide the name and contact information (i.e., phone number
and email address) of all responsible parties to the Community Development
Department and Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an
annual basis. If there is a change to the name and/or contact information of any
responsible parties, the Community Development Department and Neighborhood
Services Manager shall be notified immediately. The “responsible parties” are
those that cause, maintain, allow, or are otherwise responsible for actions
regulated by this Use Permit, or those that have an ownership interest in the real
property (Condition No. 6).
Parking Requirements
Per Table 3-4 (Parking Requirements by Use) in Section 17.72.030 (Required parking
spaces), a fraternity is required to provide one (1) space per 1.5 occupants or 1.5 spaces
per bedroom, whichever is greater. With a total of 19 residents and 12 bedrooms, the
fraternity would be required to provide 18 onsite spaces (i.e., the greater calculation
based on bedroom count) under the current parking requirement. While approval of the
original Use Permit required 14 spaces (Condition No. 2 of Resolution No. 5111 -92), this
requirement was satisfied through a combination of 12 car spaces (i.e., 10 surface spaces
and two [2] garage spaces) and 10 bicycle spaces, which in total equated to 14 spaces2.
Since there is no additional development (i.e., new construction or addition) or change in
use proposed as part of this re-review per Section 17.72.060 (Nonconforming Parking),
the fraternity use may continue and maintain a nonconforming number of parking spaces
(Condition No. 8). This new condition has been revised to clearly indicate the minim um
12 required car spaces, which is consistent with the number of spaces available onsite.
Additional information related to the nonconforming number of parking spaces is provided
in the following discussion on proposed conditions.
To facilitate the use of active transportation and address potential impacts on street
parking by the fraternity, a minimum of 19 bicycle parking spaces (one bicycle space per
bed), consistent with current requirements for 19 residents in Table 3-6 (Required Bicycle
Parking) of Section 17.72.070 (Bicycle parking standards), shall be required (Condition
No. 9). This condition would increase the number of bicycle spaces from 5 to 19 for the
site.
2 At the time of the original approval and subsequent modifications, the parking requirements did
not clearly distinguish between car and bicycle spaces. While 14 parking spaces were required
for the fraternity, this requirement was satisfied through a combination of car and bicycle spaces.
In the case of this fraternity, 12 car spaces and 10 bicycle spaces (five [5] bicycle spaces to equal
one [1] car space and stored in the garage) were provided based on capacity of the site.
Page 51 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
2.2 Conditions to Address Noise and Large Gatherings
Based on recent noise violations, staff recommends the following new conditions, which
are consistent with language in conditions of more recent approvals, to address concerns
related to noise and large gatherings:
Condition No. 2 establishes clear thresholds for re-reviews should future violations
occur. The condition requires the Planning Commission to re -evaluate the Use
Permit if the fraternity receives three (3) citations within any 12-month period for a
violation of law or permit condition that (a) are not contested or are upheld on
appeal, and (b) the conduct for which the citations were issued resulted in adverse
impacts to, or complaints from, residents or occupants of the surrounding
neighborhood.
o Note – This condition would replace procedures for handling complaints and
re-reviews identified in Condition No. 4 of the original Use Permit, U1484.
Condition No. 4 limits routine meetings and gatherings to 21 people. Any event
that includes more than 21 people is considered a special event and will require a
separate, follow-up application for more detailed review.
o Note – This condition would address concerns related to large gatherings
and replace Conditions No. 3, 11, and 12 of the original Use Permit, U1484.
While the original Use Permit confined fraternity activities to the residence
at 1304 Foothill3 because of a parking concern, the proposed Condition
No. 4 does not limit routine meetings or gatherings to a specific unit onsite.
Typically, a Conditional Use Permit review would consider the overall use
and its associated activities in relation to the entirety of the project site and
immediate vicinity. In the case of this fraternity, the members are housed
throughout all units on the property, and the allowable number of members
is regulated by the Use Permit as a standard condition in fraternity reviews.
Therefore, the scope of the Conditional Use Permit should encompass the
entirety of the site and include units addressed 190 Crandall Way, Units 1 -
5 (instead of only 1304 Foothill) to avoid future confusion. There would be
no practical or productive purpose in regulating where routine gatherings,
which are intended to be controlled and small-scale, can occur on a site that
3 In previous reviews of the original Use Permit, there were concerns regarding the nonconforming
number of parking spaces on the site. Despite all existing units being legally created, the property
contains a limited number of spaces and would not satisfy parking requirements if the fraternity
use was approved for the entire site at the time. Even though fraternity members live in all units
and the allowable number of members throughout the property is regulated by this Use Permit,
fraternity activities were confined to the residence at 1304 Foothill as a fraternity house (which
had a higher parking requirement) and the other units at 190 Crandall were acknowledged as
multifamily residences (which had a lower parking requirement) to meet the parking requirements.
For practical purposes, the fraternity utilizes the entire site as both a place of residence and
activities, and should be recognized as such in this re-review. Aside from an increase to the
number of bicycle spaces per Condition No. 9, there are no changes to the existing 12 parking
spaces.
Page 52 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
houses fraternity members throughout. Any concerns related to potential
impacts from these gatherings (i.e., noise, unruly behavior, and other public
disturbances) would be directly addressed through the recommended Use
Permit conditions and Municipal Code requirements.
In addition, proposed Condition No. 4 does not attempt to identify
acceptable types of special events (e.g., parent or alumni barbeques) or
establish additional limitations for attendees of special events (e.g.,
maximum of 38 people), as detailed in Condition No. 11 of the old Use
Permit. As proposed, this revised condition requires that any event involving
more than 21 people would require additional review to appropriately
evaluate and address potential impacts of each re quest.
Condition No. 10 includes an extended range of hours between 10:00 p.m. and
9:00 a.m. (instead of only between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. as required by the
Municipal Code) for regular compliance with a lower exterior noise limit.
o Note – This condition would directly address noise concerns and replace
Condition No. 5 of the original Use Permit, U1484. It should be noted that
people in private residences (e.g., residents of the fraternity) are legally
allowed to gather and meet with guests without gove rnment interference
into their private residences, relationships, and associations, provided that
the number and conduct of those residents and guests conform to
applicable regulations. Due to constitutional concerns with placing a
condition that limits the type of people in private residences (i.e., residents
vs. non-residents), Condition No. 10 was written to directly address noise
concerns by identifying an extended range of hours between 10:00 p.m. and
9:00 a.m. for regular compliance with a lower exterior noise limit.
Condition No. 11 requires that the fraternity establish and maintain ongoing
communication with its neighbors in the vicinity.
o Note – This condition would address concerns related to neighborhood
relations and replace Conditions No. 7 and 12 of the original Use Permit,
U1484.
Condition No. 12 states that amplified noise-generating activities are prohibited.
o Note – This condition would replace Condition No. 10 of the original Use
Permit, U1484.
Conditions No. 4, 11, and 12 clarify that any requested exceptions from the Noise
Ordinance will not be approved by the Director.
o Note – This condition would address concerns related to Condition No. 10
of the original Use Permit, U1484.
2.3 Other Changes to the Conditions
As part of the re-review, staff recommends revising the conditions to (a) reflect updated
language for consistency with more recent approvals and (b) identify the necessary
corrective actions based on current violations.
Page 53 of 90
Item 4b
USE-0333-2025
Planning Commission Report – May 28, 2025
Other Conditions with Proposed Updated Language
Requirements detailed in Condition No. 8 of the original Use Permit, U1484, related to
grounds for revocation have been further refined and incorporated with updated language
as Condition No. 13 in the re-review.
Conditions Proposed for Removal
Staff is not recommending that any conditions of the original approval be removed, except
as discussed above in this report.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities)
of the CEQA Guidelines because it includes the continued operation and permitting of an
existing residential use (i.e., fraternity) with revised findings and conditions of approval.
The project does not include construction of a new building or additional building square
footage. Therefore, the project involves no expansion of the existing residential use.
4.0 ALTERNATIVES
1. Continue review of the Conditional Use Permit. An action to continue review of the
Conditional Use Permit should include a detailed list of additional information or
analysis required to make a decision regarding added, modified, and/or removed
conditions.
2. Revoke the Conditional Use Permit. An action to revoke the Conditional Use
Permit should include findings that cite the basis for revocation and reference
inconsistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, and other policy
documents.
5.0 ATTACHMENTS
A. Draft PC Resolution (USE-0333-2025)
B. PC Resolution No. 5017-90 (Approval of the Original Use Permit, U1484)
C. PC Resolution No. 5055-91 (Review Following First Year)
D. PC Resolution No. 5111-92 (Review Following Second Year)
E. Notice to Correct Code Violation(s), dated January 8, 2025
F. Administrative Citation, dated April 2, 2025
Page 54 of 90
RESOLUTION NO. PC-XXXX-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO AN EXISTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONTINUATION OF THE
FRATERNITY AT 1304 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 190 CRANDALL
WAY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
UNDER SECTION 15301 (EXISTING FACILITIES) OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES AS
REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED
MAY 28, 2025 (USE-0333-2025)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 14, 1990,
for the review of a Use Permit to allow a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard (Resolution
No. 5017-90 1990 Series); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 8, 1991, to
review a previously approved Use Permit allowing a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard,
pursuant to a proceeding instituted under U1484; Sigma Nu, applicant (Resolution No.
5055-91 (1991 Series); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on October 14, 1992,
to re-review a previously approved and amended Use Permit allowing a fraternity at 1304
Foothill Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under U1484; Sigma Nu, applicant
(Resolution No. 5111-92 (1992 Series); and
WHEREAS, the City received complaints, and the Police Department issued
four citations relating to noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic year
(September 2024 to present, May 2025) and Code Enforcement issued a Notice of
Violation and Administrative Citation in January and April 2025, respectively, relating to
the multiple, verified violations of the existing Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 28, 2025,
for the re-review of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity at
1304 Foothill Boulevard and 190 Crandall Way, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under
USE-0333-2025; Sigma Nu, applicant; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis
Obispo considered all evidence, including documented noise violations, testimony of the
applicant and general public and evaluation, and recommendations by staff ; and
Page 55 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 2
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the
manner required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The Planning Commission hereby approves the Conditional
Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity (USE -0333-2025), based on the
following revised findings:
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed fraternity is
an allowable use as dense group housing in the High Density Residential (HDR)
land use designation. In addition, the project would facilitate Land Use Element
Policy 2.6.5 and Housing Element Policy 8.6 by locating a fraternity in proximity to
the Cal Poly SLO campus and other student-oriented uses and housing.
2. The proposed fraternity is conditionally allowed within the High-Density Residential
(R-4) zone. As conditioned, the project complies with applicable provisions of the
Zoning Regulations because (a) the maximum number of 19 residents complies
with the group housing maximum occupancy limits, and (b) the parking
configuration would provide 12 required spaces, consistent with the
nonconforming parking space capacity of the project site per Section 17.72.060
(Nonconforming Parking).
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the project will be
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity because the
proposed fraternity would (a) be established in proximity to other dense group
housing (i.e., other fraternities, sororities, multi-family, etc.), (b) located within
walking distance (i.e., within 0.3-mile) of the Cal Poly campus, and (c) utilize an
existing developed property.
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of (a) its design, location, shape, size, and
operating characteristics of the project; (b) traffic generation and the provision of
public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access; (c) public protection
services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and (d) the provision of
utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm
drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.). The project is
surrounded by other developed properties with compatible dense housing uses,
has access to the City’s circulation system, and would be served by City utilities.
The project utilizes an existing developed property and does not include activities
that would generate service or utility demands beyond those anticipated with uses
permitted in the vicinity.
5. As conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare
of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because conditions have
been included that place limits on the number of persons allowed on site, restrict
activities, provide adequate parking, and limit potential disturbances to neighboring
properties. The project will be compatible with the existing site constraints and the
character of the neighborhood.
Page 56 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 3
6. As conditioned, the establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the
project will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public
or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental
or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use because the
project includes conditions that (a) place limits on the number of persons allowed
on site, (b) restrict activities, (c) provide adequate parking, and (d) limit potential
disturbances to neighboring properties. The project would be compatible with the
existing site constraints and the character of the neighborhood.
SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental
review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines because it
includes the continued operation and permitting of an existing residential use. (i.e.,
fraternity) with revised conditions of approval. The project does not include construction
of a new building or additional building square footage. Therefore, the project involves no
expansion of the former residential use.
SECTION 3. Action. The Planning Commission hereby approves the Conditional
Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity (USE -0333-2025), based on the
following revised conditions:
Planning Division – Community Development Department
1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Community Development
Director for compliance with the conditions of approval, or to determine whether a
modification of the Conditional Use Permit is necessary upon significant change
to the project as represented in the Staff Report dated May 28, 2025, or in the
event of a change in ownership which may result in deviation from the project
description or approved plans.
2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as
soon as practical if conduct on the permitted premises results in three (3) citations
within any 12-month period for a violation of law or permit condition that (a) are
not contested or are upheld on appeal, and (b) the conduct for which the citations
were issued resulted in adverse impacts to, or complaints from, residents or
occupants of the surrounding neighborhood. At the time of the Conditional Use
Permit review, to ensure ongoing compatibility with nearby uses, the conditions of
approval may be added, modified, and/or removed, or the Conditional Use Permit
may be revoked. The City shall notify Cal Poly if the Use Permit is revoked. A re -
review by the Planning Commission shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee.
3. The fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 19 residents for the property. The
property owner shall allow the City to verify the maximum occupancy by allowing
an inspection of records or visual inspection of the premises. Any inspection shall
be scheduled at a reasonable time with at least 24-hour notice to the residents.
Page 57 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 4
4. Routine meetings and gatherings for the fraternity shall be limited to a maximum
of 21 people (rounded down from 21.45 = 14.3 people x 1.5), except as otherwise
approved by the Community Development Director for special events. If the
fraternity hosts special events involving more than 21 people, a transportation
management plan to reduce impacts to the surrounding neighborhood shall be
submitted to the Community Development Department, at least 30 days prior to
the event taking place, for review and approval. No exception from the Noise
Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as Part of the special event. The
presence of more than 21 people at the property without a valid special eve nt
approval shall be considered a violation of this Conditional Use Permit.
5. The fraternity shall remain affiliated and in good standing with the Interfraternity
Council of Student Life and Leadership at California Polytechnic University, San
Luis Obispo. If the fraternity becomes unaffiliated or is no longer in good standing,
the Conditional Use Permit shall be automatically revoked.
6. The fraternity shall provide the name and contact information (i.e., phone number
and email address) of all responsible parties to the Community Development
Department and Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an
annual basis. If there is a change to the name and/or contact information of any
responsible parties, the Community Development Department and Neighborhood
Services Manager shall be notified immediately.
7. The property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner and in compliance
with the Municipal Code. All landscaping shall be replaced as necessary and
maintained (e.g., trimmed, pruned, etc.) to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director.
8. A minimum of 12 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained at all times.
These spaces shall remain available to residents of the fraternity and not
designated for any individuals not residing on the property.
9. Within 60 days of the re-review hearing with the Planning Commission on May 28,
2025, the fraternity shall install a minimum of 19 bicycle spaces (based on one
bed for each resident) and contact the City for a follow-up inspection to verify that
all required bicycle spaces have been installed.
10. The fraternity use shall comply with Table 1 (Exterior Noise Limits) of Section
9.12.060 (Exterior Noise Limits) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code between
the extended hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m.
11. Prior to a special event approved by the Community Development Director
pursuant to Condition No. 4, the fraternity shall provide written notification of the
event to all occupants residing within 300 feet of the site. The written notification
shall include the date, hours, and contact information for the responsible party for
the special event. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by
the Director as part of the special event.
Page 58 of 90
Resolution No. PC-XXXX-25 Page 5
12. Live entertainment, bands, and/or amplified sounds are prohibited, unless
otherwise approved through a special event by the Community Development
Department. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the
Director as part of the special event.
13. Failure to comply with any of the above conditions or code requirements, or the
conduct of the use so as to constitute a violation of Federal, State, or local law, or
so as to constitute a public nuisance or so as to cause adverse impacts on the
health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicin ity of this use is prohibited and
considered a violation of this Conditional Use Permit and may constitute grounds
for the revocation of this permit.
Effect of Resolution
This Resolution repeals and replaces Resolution No. 5017-90 1990 Series), Resolution
No. 5055-91 (1991 Series), and Resolution No. 5111-92 (1992 Series). The Conditional
Use Permit to allow the continuation of a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Blvd. and 190 Crandall
Way is subject to the revised conditions stated in this Resolution.
Indemnification
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and/or its
agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the
City and/or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul,
the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including
but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall
promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with
the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an
Indemnified Claim.
On motion by Commissioner ______, seconded by Commissioner ______, and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
RECUSED:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 28th day of May 2025.
___________________
Tyler Corey, Secretary
Planning Commission
Page 59 of 90
Page 60 of 90
Page 61 of 90
Page 62 of 90
Page 63 of 90
Page 64 of 90
Page 65 of 90
Page 66 of 90
Page 67 of 90
Page 68 of 90
Page 69 of 90
Page 70 of 90
Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation
(Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation)
January 8, 2025
Wright Thomas E Tre Etal, Inactive wright Decedents Trust (TR 1)
1149 Huntington Dr
South Pasadena, CA 91030
SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1304 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-81-011
Code Case #: CODE-000002-2025
Dear Property Owner,
City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address:
1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC §17.76.060)
“It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing,
occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property
in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon:
1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned
development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement
or land use permit.”
Conditions number four and five of the use permit associated with the property indicate that
:
“4. If a reasonable complaint is received in writing by the community Development Department,
a. The complaint shall be forwarded to the interfraternity Council and the Planning Commission
within one week of receipt for review and comment. The names of the people filing the complaint
shall not be included without their consent. Copies of all correspondence will be sent to the Dean
of Students and the fraternity.
b. The complaint, and the comments from the Interfraternity Council if received, shall be forwarded
by the Planning Division to the Planning Commission for consideration at the commission’s next
available meeting.
5. No meetings or other gatherings involving persons other than fraternity members living on this site are
allowed between the hours of 10 p.m. and 9 a.m.”
There are multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police contacts. Code
enforcement staff will be recommending review of the use permit to the Deputy Director of Community
Development. A determination made by the Deputy Director that the evidence submitted warrants review,
Page 71 of 90
modification, or revocation of the current use permit by the Planning Commission will be followed by
notification to the property owner and other responsible parties.
We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s) no later than 2/17/2024.
These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) by the
specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in
accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after
issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies.
Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by
completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community
Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely
file a Request for Director’s Review.
We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your
efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you
have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org.
Sincerely,
RAMI SALEM
Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator
Cc: File
Enclosures: Request for Directors Review
Page 72 of 90
01/07/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919
14:17 NSPY Clearance Data Page: 1
NSPY OFF/LOC/CLEARANCE:
Incident address When reported Responsible off Cle Offe
------------------------- ------------------- --------------- --- ----
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 22:38:51 12/07/2024 Brewer, D CIT NSPY
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 22:47:31 11/01/2024 Johnson, G NV NSPY
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 21:52:43 11/01/2024 Cutler, B CIT NSPY
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 22:54:54 10/26/2024 Church, C NV NSPY
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 19:22:43 10/14/2024 Etherton, B NR DCON
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 15:24:21 05/11/2024 Bravo, D CIT NSPY
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 21:59:19 04/03/2024 Mangskau, N NV NSPY
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 22:26:52 02/01/2024 Jarvis, A CIT NSPY
1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; 15:56:31 01/10/2024 Johanson, T NR SUSP
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Page 73 of 90
Page 74 of 90
Page 75 of 90
Page 76 of 90
Page 77 of 90
Page 78 of 90
Details:
On 05/11/2023, at 15.30 hours, I responded
to 1304 E Foothill Blvd in San Luis Obispo
for a report of a noise violation from an
alleged party. I arrived on scene and
parked approximately 200 feet from 1304 E
Foothill Blvd. I activated my camera and in-
car video and approached the residence.
Based on the noise ordinance stipulations,
the loud music, screaming and yelling
could be heard from about 200 feet away. I
could also see alcohol violations, and
numerous individuals coming and going
from the location. Based on that
information and the fact the noise was
excessive, I contacted a responsible
person for the party.
SUB/ Ryan Anthony SAVARESE stated he
was the individual responsible and was
identified by his CDL. I explained that there
was a noise violation, and the noise was in
violation of the SLMC 9.12.050A. I issued a
citation based on the violation.
Savarese was cooperative and stated he
understood and stated his intentions were
not to cause any issues. SAVARESE
stated he understood the citation, which he
signed. I provided him with a copy of the
citation.
Body Camera # 47
Ofcr Ybarra #108574
Page 79 of 90
Page 80 of 90
Page 81 of 90
Page 82 of 90
Declaration of Service and Posting of Notice
SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1304 Foothill Blvd, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
CASE NO.: 000002-2025 Citation No.: 00038933 Officer: Rami Salem
I/we, the undersigned, declare that at all times herein mentioned, I/we were and now are a duly authorized
employee(s) of the Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo, State of California; that
pursuant to Section 1.24.050G of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (SLOMC), Section 1101.4 of the
Uniform Housing Code, or Section 401.4 of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as
adopted by Section 15.02.010 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, I/we deposited in a receptacle for the
U.S. Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, by regular mail, and/or certified mail, return
receipt requested the following:
A Notice to Correct,
Notice of Violation,
Administrative Citation,
Stop-Work Notice,
Notice of Hearing,
Notice of Proposed Lien,
Notice of Special Assessment
Notifying the owner of the property of the subject address referenced above of violations of the San Luis
Obispo Municipal Code existing on the property and/or of related abatement proceedings.
The above notice was sent to each person having an interest in the property at their respective addresses as
listed in the Notice, and a copy of the notice was posted at the subject address.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 02 day of 04, 2024, San Luis Obispo, California
Officer or clerk effecting service by mail:
Rami Salem Rami Salem 01:17 PM 04/02/2025
(Print Name) (Signature) (Time/date)
Officer effecting service by posting:
Rami Salem Rami Salem 01:17 PM 04/02/2025
(Print Name) (Signature) (Time/date)
Page 83 of 90
Citation No.:00038933
ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION
AND ORDER TO COMPLY WITH
SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE
1st Citation 2nd Citation 3rd Citation Additional / Daily Fines
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1304 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 APN:052-081-011
DATE OF VIOLATION: 01/08/2025
NAME: Wright Thomas E Tre Etal, Inative Wright Decedants Trust (TR 1)
ADDRESS: 1149 Huntington Dr South Pasadena, CA 91030
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 1.24 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED
TO IMMEDIATELY CORRECT THE VIOLATION(S) DESCRIBED BELOW AND PAY THE FINE. YOU ARE
FURTHER ORDERED TO CEASE THE ACTIVITY GIVING RISE TO THE VIOLATION. WHEN CORRECTIONS
ARE COMPLETE PLEASE SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION BY CALLING (805)781-7180. TO AVOID ADDITIONAL
FINES COMPLIANCE MUST BE VERIFIED BY DEPARTMENT STAFF. IF DAILY FINES APPLY AS NOTED
ABOVE, THE FINES SHALL ACCRUE DAILY UNTIL THE VIOLATION(S) ARE CORRECTED. FAILURE TO
CORRECT THE VIOLATION(S) WILL RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE
CITATIONS AND ESCALATING FINES OR OTHER ENFORCEMENT ACTION.
CODE SECTION DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION FINE
MC § 17.76.060
“It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm
or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having
possession of any private property in the City to maintain such
property in such a manner that any of the following conditions
are found to exist thereon:
1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit,
conditional use permit, planned development permit,
architectural review approval, variance, or other land use
entitlement or land use permit.”
$50
Amount Due $50
Failure to pay the fines may result in the suspension of any pending applications or permits. Unpaid fines
become delinquent after 30 days and are subject to interest accrual of 8% per month as contained in
SLOMC 1.24.070 C. The City may pursue all legal, equitable, and administrative remedies for
the collection of unpaid civil administrative fines. Delinquent fines will be forwarded to a collection agency
for payment.
Mail Payments to: City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development Department
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
You may file an APPEAL of this Administrative Citation by submitting a request in writing to the
Hearing Administrator within ten days of the date this Administrative Citation is issued as shown below.
Each responsible party is individually required to file an appeal. FAILURE TO FILE AN APPEAL
WILL WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO CONTEST THIS CITATION. Please see the attached Appeal Form
for more information.
Page 84 of 90
[Type text]
Mail Appeals to: City of San Luis Obispo, City Clerk
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Issued By: Rami Salem Signature: Rami Salem Title: Code Enforcement Officer
RELATED CE CASE: CODE-000002-2025 DATE CITATION ISSUED: 04/01/2025
Page 85 of 90
INVOICE (00038933)
FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
BILLING CONTACT
INACTIVE WRIGHT DECEDENTS TRUST (TR 1)
WRIGHT THOMAS E TRE ETAL
SOUTH PASADENA, CA 91030
INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION
00038933 04/01/2025 05/01/2025 NONEDue
REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL
CODE-000002-2025 NSS 1st Admin Citation $50.00
$50.00 SUBTOTAL1304 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
TOTAL $50.00 REMITTANCE INFORMATION
Report Text Library: Municipality_Invoice_Remit_To
Address Line 2
Address Line 3
Address Line 4
*00038933*
City of San Luis ObispoApril 01, 2025 Page 1 of 1Page 86 of 90
Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation
(Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation)
January 8, 2025
Wright Thomas E Tre Etal, Inactive wright Decedents Trust (TR 1)
1149 Huntington Dr
South Pasadena, CA 91030
SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1304 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-81-011
Code Case #: CODE-000002-2025
Dear Property Owner,
City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address:
1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC §17.76.060)
“It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing,
occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property
in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon:
1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned
development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement
or land use permit.”
Conditions number four and five of the use permit associated with the property indicate that:
“4. If a reasonable complaint is received in writing by the community Development Department,
a. The complaint shall be forwarded to the interfraternity Council and the Planning Commission
within one week of receipt for review and comment. The names of the people filing the complaint
shall not be included without their consent. Copies of all correspondence will be sent to the Dean
of Students and the fraternity.
b. The complaint, and the comments from the Interfraternity Council if received, shall be forwarded
by the Planning Division to the Planning Commission for consideration at the commission’s next
available meeting.
5. No meetings or other gatherings involving persons other than fraternity members living on this site are
allowed between the hours of 10 p.m. and 9 a.m.”
There are multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police contacts between
1/10/2024 and 12/07/2024. Code enforcement staff will be recommending review of the use permit to the
Deputy Director of Community Development. A determination made by the Deputy Director that the
evidence submitted warrants review, modification, or revocation of the current use permit by the Planning
Commission will be followed by notification to the property owner and other responsible parties.
Page 87 of 90
We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s). Immediate
compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to
correct the violation(s) by the specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation
requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations
that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by
other civil or criminal remedies.
Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by
completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community
Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely
file a Request for Director’s Review.
We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your
efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you
have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org.
Sincerely,
RAMI SALEM
Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator
Cc: File
Enclosures: Request for Directors Review
Page 88 of 90
Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation
(Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation)
January 8, 2025
1304 Foothill Blvd
San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1304 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-81-011
Code Case #: CODE-000002-2025
Dear Property Owner,
City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address:
1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC §17.76.060)
“It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing,
occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property
in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon:
1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned
development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement
or land use permit.”
Conditions number four and five of the use permit associated with the property indicate that:
“4. If a reasonable complaint is received in writing by the community Development Department,
a. The complaint shall be forwarded to the interfraternity Council and the Planning Commission
within one week of receipt for review and comment. The names of the people filing the complaint
shall not be included without their consent. Copies of all correspondence will be sent to the Dean
of Students and the fraternity.
b. The complaint, and the comments from the Interfraternity Council if received, shall be forwarded
by the Planning Division to the Planning Commission for consideration at the commission’s next
available meeting.
5. No meetings or other gatherings involving persons other than fraternity members living on this site are
allowed between the hours of 10 p.m. and 9 a.m.”
There are multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police contacts between
1/10/2024 and 12/07/2024. Code enforcement staff will be recommending review of the use permit to the
Deputy Director of Community Development. A determination made by the Deputy Director that the
evidence submitted warrants review, modification, or revocation of the current use permit by the Planning
Commission will be followed by notification to the property owner and other responsible parties.
Page 89 of 90
We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s). Immediate
compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to
correct the violation(s) by the specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation
requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations
that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by
other civil or criminal remedies.
Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by
completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community
Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely
file a Request for Director’s Review.
We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your
efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you
have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org.
Sincerely,
RAMI SALEM
Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator
Cc: File
Enclosures: Request for Directors Review
Page 90 of 90