HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 5a. Tree Removal Application (TREE-0179-2025)
TREE COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR THE REMOVAL OF 5 PALM TREES LOCATED AT 2777
FLORA ST (APPLICATION NO. TREE-0179-2025)
FROM: Walter Gault, City Arborist
Phone Number: (805) 781-7578
Email: wgault@slocity.org
RECOMMENDATION
Review the proposed tree removal application for consistency with the Municipal Code
Section 12.24.090(E) and provide a recommendation to the Community Development
Director.
1.0 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION
Joshua Davis, the applicant, has
requested the removal of five (5)
Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan
Palm) at 2777 Flora Street located
within the R-1 zone. The applicant
has indicated in their application that
the trunks and roots of the palms are
impacting an existing solar thermal
system, have outgrown their planter
boxes and that the fronds have
become dangerous.
The applicant would like to remove
the palm trees and replace them with
five (5) compensatory trees onsite
including one (1) Dogwood in the
front yard, two (2) Jacaranda
mimosifolia (Purple Trumpet) in the
parkway along El Paseo Ct, and two
(2) non-fruiting Olive trees in the
backyard.
Meeting Date: 5/19/2025
Item Number: 5a
Time Estimate: 30 Minutes
Figure 1 – Site of proposed tree removals
Page 9 of 29
Item 5a
TREE-0179-2025
Tree Committee Report – 5-19-2025
2.0 COMMITTEE PURVIEW
The Tree Committee’s role
is to review the removal
request in accordance with
the process set forth in San
Luis Obispo Municipal Code
(SLOMC) Chapter 12.24,
specifically Section
12.24.090(E)(3) - tree
removals related to property
owner convenience. This
code section utilizes the
process set forth in
subsection F(2), the relevant
additional application
requirements in subsection
(D)(2) and the criteria set
forth in subsection (G).
3.0 TREE REGULATIONS
The City’s Tree Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 12.24) was adopted with the purpose
of establishing a comprehensive program for installing, maintaining, and preserving trees
within the City. This ordinance establishes policies, regulations, and specifications
necessary to govern installation, maintenance, removal, and preservation of trees to
beautify the city; to purify the air; to provide shade and wind protection; to add
environmental and economic value; and to preserve trees with historic or unusual value.
Criteria for Convenience Tree Removal Applications.
SLOMC §12.24.090 subsection (E)(3) requires review by the Tree Committee using the
criteria set for in SLOMC §12.24.090(G). Applicable criteria are provided in italics below
and followed by a description of the proposed tree removals as it relates to that criterion.
(G)(1). Size of Tree. The scale of the tree shall be considered, as well as the size
of the tree’s canopy. Larger, more visually prominent trees may have a higher
preservation priority than smaller, less visually prominent trees.
The trees proposed for removal are large and visually prominent in the
neighborhood.
(G)(2). Location of Tree on Private Property. The location of the tree on private
property shall be considered. Trees located in a private rear yard, which are not
highly visible from the public right-of-way, may have a lower preservation priority
than trees with a high visual impact to the neighborhood.
Figure 2 – View of palm trees (on left) from El Paseo Ct.
Page 10 of 29
Item 5a
TREE-0179-2025
Tree Committee Report – 5-19-2025
The tree proposed for removal is located in the backyard but it is also highly visible
from the public right of way.
(G)(3). Species of Tree. Native trees shall have a higher preservation priority than
non-native trees.
The trees proposed for removal are non-native.
(G)(4). Forestry Best Practice. The number of healthy trees that a given parcel of
land will support shall be considered, and whether removal would enhance the
health or survival of remaining trees. Applications that increase biodiversity of
native trees and tree age distribution within a given area are preferred.
The removal and replanting would increase the biodiversity of the urban forest and
tree age distribution.
(G)(6). Compliance with Subsection J of This Section Regarding Compensatory
Plantings. The approving authority may consider an application proposal to provide
compensatory plantings in excess of required minimums in evaluating this
criterion.
The applicant is proposing to meet the minimum required replanting rate of 1:1.
(G)(7). Heritage Trees. Heritage trees have the highest preservation priority.
The trees are not heritage trees.
4.0 ACTIONS
4.1 Recommend findings of consistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending approval of the proposed tree removals based on consistency
will be forwarded to the Community Development Director for final action. This
action may include recommendations regarding the compensatory replanting
plan with size and species of tree.
4.2 Recommend findings of inconsistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending denial of the proposed tree removals should include findings
that cite the basis for denial and should reference inconsistency with the
General Plan, Tree Regulations, or other policy documents.
4.3 Continue the project to a hearing date certain, or uncertain. An action
continuing the review of the proposed tree removals should include direction to
the applicant and staff on pertinent issues.
Page 11 of 29
Item 5a
TREE-0179-2025
Tree Committee Report – 5-19-2025
5.0 ATTACHMENTS
A - Tree Removal Application Form
B - Site Plan
C - Photo Catalogue & Replanting Plan
D - Arborist Report
Page 12 of 29
Page 13 of 29
Page 14 of 29
Page 15 of 29
Page 16 of 29
Photo Log for 2777 Flora St
Tree Removal Application for Five Palm Trees in Backyard
1. Picture of all five Washingtonia Robustas palm trees. Palm trees are marked by pink ribbons.
Trees 1-3 are in a cluster on the right-hand side and are marked by one ribbon on each trunk.
Tree 4 is in the middle and is marked by 2 pink ribbons on the trunk. Tree 5 is on the left-hand
side and marked by three pink ribbons on the trunk.
Page 17 of 29
2. Trees 1-3 cluster. Each tree has a single ribbon around the trunks. First picture is the base.
Second picture is looking at the trees from the other side.
Page 18 of 29
Page 19 of 29
3. Tree 4. The tree has two ribbons around the trunk. First picture is the base. Second picture is
full height. The third picture shows the solar thermal pipes that transports the pool water up to
the roof of the house to heat. The pipes are at the base of the fence and go behind the tree trunks.
Page 20 of 29
Page 21 of 29
Page 22 of 29
4. Tree 5. The tree has three ribbons around the trunk. First picture is the base. Second picture is
full height.
Page 23 of 29
Page 24 of 29
Replanting Plan for 2777 Flora St
in accordance with 12.24.090(J)
Notes:
Application is for removal of five trees
Intent is to compensate each tree removal with one new tree, if needed
Compensatory plantings:
a dogwood tree in the front yard adjacent to existing dogwood
two jacaranda trees on street frontage to match neighbor’s street frontage plantings
two non-fruiting olive trees along back fence by pool to match neighbor’s olive trees in
their yard
Page 25 of 29
Page 26 of 29
Palm Assessment at 2777 Flora Street
San Luis Obispo, CA
Joshua Davis 1 | P a g e
Memorandum
To: Joshua Davis From: Sam Oakley
2777 Flora Street Master Arborist WE-9474B
San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Consulting Arborist #556
503.329.9580 415.407.6995
joshua.ac.davis@gmail.com sam@oakleygroup.org
Subject: Tree Assessment at 2777 Flora Street, San Luis Obispo
Date: February 17, 2025
Introduction
We were asked to prepare an arborist report for five (5) Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan
Palm) tree at 2777 Flora Street in San Luis Obispo, California.
Observations
The five subject trees are Washingtonia
robusta, 17-, 26-inches DSH, and a 21, 22,
and 36-inch DSH cluster (Fig. 1).
They are growing in a narrow, raised
planter bordering the northwest property
line in the backyard of the 2777 Flora Street
property (Fig. 2).
The palms are in fair health with front tip
necrosis and frond dieback typical of the
species.
They are 60- to 70-feet in height.
The palms share their planter with a native
oak, pittosporum shrubs, and several
smaller palm trees (Fig. 3).
Figure 1: image of the subject palms in their planter.
Page 27 of 29
Palm Assessment at 2777 Flora Street
San Luis Obispo, CA
Joshua Davis 2 | P a g e
Figure 2: subject palms location at 2777 Flora Street (grey marker).
Figure 3: the narrow planter the palms are growing in (red arrow showing the heat pipe that need replacement).
Page 28 of 29
Palm Assessment at 2777 Flora Street
San Luis Obispo, CA
Joshua Davis 3 | P a g e
Discussion
The palms are considered regulated pursuant to Chapter 12.24.090 of the SLOMC.
The primary concern regarding these palms is that the palms have outgrown their planter,
and you would like them removed. I agree that the planter is inadequate for their future
growth and they should be removed.
Secondly, you have had several near-
misses of fronds that have fallen and
struck the ground at terminal velocity,
and you are concerned that eventually a
falling frond will injure someone.
Annual pruning can mitigate the
potential for fronds to build up in the
crown and fall.
Lastly, you expressed that the pool’s
solar water heater piping needs
repairing and cannot be done without
the palms removed. I have confirmed
that the palm trunks are growing
directly into the pipe. Removing and
repairing/replacing the pipe would
cause irreparable damage to the trunks
of several palms.
Removal of these palms would likely
require replacement. We have
determined that at least three (3)
replacement trees could be located
along the street frontage of El Paseo
Court (Fig. 4). Other trees can be
located within the front yard
landscaping.
Recommendations
I recommend that you consider removing the palms to repair the water heater piping. I
recommend that you:
•An application for removal be prepared and submitted. If removal is granted, remove
the palms and perform repairs to the infrastructure as soon as possible. Replace as
required.
Figure 4: potential replanting locations along El Paseo Court.
Page 29 of 29