Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/7/2025 Item 6f, Jackson - Staff Agenda CorrespondenceCity of San Luis Obispo, Council Memorandum City of San Luis Obispo Council Agenda Correspondence DATE: October 7, 2025 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Emily Jackson, Finance Director VIA: Whitney McDonald, City Manager SUBJECT: ITEM 6f – JP MORGAN BANKING SERVICES CONTRACT Staff received the following questions, regarding the item to request approval of the JP Morgan Banking Services contract. The questions are below with staff’s response shown in italics: 1) Were there any areas where JP Morgan was going to cost more than the other two vendors? On an individual service-by-service comparison, there were some services that cost more with JP Morgan. These were generally services that are infrequently used by the City and given the City’s transaction volumes, the overall costs with JP Morgan are competitively priced and represent good value to the City. One example of a service that cost more with JP Morgan is the Account Maintenance Fee, which is paid on a monthly basis. JP Morgan’s fee for this service is $5.00 a month higher than another respondent to the City’s Request for Proposals- a total increase of $60.00 per year compared to another proposer. 2) Please provide a little more explanation for the recommendation of the 7 - year contract (with three possible extensions) rather than the typical practice of five years? Staff have found through market research that 10 -year contract terms are increasingly becoming the industry norm for municipal banking services, as demonstrated by comparable long-term agreements adopted by other municipalities. A longer-term contract at 10 years provides stability to the City for banking services, and reduces administrative and solicitation costs associated with frequent rebidding, enables financial institutions to offer enhanced pricing, loyalty credits, and technology investments, like JP Morgan has provided in its bid for the contract. ITEM 6F – JP MORGAN BANKING SERVICES CONTRACT Page 2 In addition to the responses provided above, staff is providing a correction to the Council Agenda Report: Correction to Recommended Term - JP Morgan Banking Services Contract The Council Agenda Report inadvertently stated the agreement with JP Morgan would be a seven-year term with a three-year extension, which reflected an earlier version of the agreement options considered before the agreement was finalized. The recommended term is being updated via this Agenda Correspondence to a ten-year term with no option for extension. This longer term does not increase risk to the City, as the agreement includes standard provisions that allow the City to terminate the contract at any tim e with adequate notice, though this option is not anticipated, given the positive and productive working relationship that the City has enjoyed with JP Morgan. This termination flexibility ensures the City can retain control over the relationship and adjust as needed based on performance or changing needs.