HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/28/2025 Item 5a, Ingels
Steve Ingels <steve@havenslo.com>
Sent:Tuesday, October
To:E-mail Council Website
Subject:Subject: October 28th Study Session-Renter Protections
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
As a local REALTOR® and housing professional over the last 34 years, I’m writing to share my
perspective on the City’s upcoming discussion about renter protections and a potential rental
registry. As REALTORS®, we are committed to promoting safe, habitable housing in our community.
Every day, we work with residents seeking both homeownership and rental opportunities, and we also
support those who provide housing through investment properties. For many property owners, rental
homes represent a vital part of their retirement plan, while for others, they are the foundation of a small
business and livelihood.
Past Experience Shows It Does Not Work. San Luis Obispo has already tried a rental inspection
program, and it was ultimately repealed after proving costly, inefficient, and unpopular with both renters
and housing providers. Bringing back a similar program under a new name risks repeating the same
mistakes without solving the problem properties. Unnecessary Duplication of Existing Laws California
already has strong tenant protections through AB 1482 and state habitability laws. Local Code
Enforcement already has the tools to address unsafe housing conditions.
Creating a new registry only adds another layer of regulation without addressing the real issue—
consistent enforcement of existing laws. Privacy Concerns for Renters and Owners A rental registry
would collect personal information about both tenants and property owners, creating unnecessary
privacy risks. Even with the best intentions, this data could be mishandled or breached. Protecting
personal information should remain a top priority. Costs Will Fall on Renters Any new fees or compliance
costs will inevitably be passed down to tenants in the form of higher rents.
At a time when affordability is one of the City’s greatest challenges, adding new costs runs directly
counter to the goal of keeping housing attainable for our local workforce. There are better
alternatives. We do not expect that the “bad actors” will voluntarily register, which makes the proposed
program ineffective for its intended purpose. Instead, the City could: Use the existing business license
requirement, modifying it to require owners to list their rental properties. Another option could be
e stablish ing a rental assistance program to directly help tenants in need rather than adding
bureaucracy.
In other jurisdictions, rental registries have often been the first step toward rent control policies, which
we strongly oppose. Rent control undermines private property rights, discourages investment in housing,
and ultimately reduces the supply of available rental homes. Thank you for considering the perspective
of those who work on the front lines of housing every day. We share your goal of ensuring safe, quality
homes for San Luis Obispo residents, but believe that effective enforcement, education, and partnership
will achieve more than additional regulation. Thank you for your service to the City and for your
commitment to addressing housing challenges in San Luis Obispo.
1
Our local REALTORS® do share that same commitment and stand ready to assist the City through
education, outreach, and collaboration to ensure safe and attainable housing for all residents.
Sincerely,
STEVE INGELS
REALTOR
®
DRE #01121033
BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS REAL ESTATE | HAVEN PROPERTIES
1880 Santa Barbara Ave, #220, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Steve@HavenSLO.com
805-305-8882
2