Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/28/2025 Item 4a, Walker, K. kathie walker < To:E-mail Council Website; Stewart, Erica A; Shoresman, Michelle; Francis, Emily; Marx, Jan; Boswell, Mike Subject:Cal Poly Must Provide On-Campus Housing for Its Fraternities Mayor Stewart and Council Members Shoresman, Marx, Francis and Boswell, In light of Cal Poly's housing presentation at the upcoming Council meeting, I would like to provide the following input: It is critical that Cal Poly take responsibility for housing its fraternities on campus to relieve the ongoing burden placed on the City and its neighborhoods. Most fraternity events involve alcohol, as confirmed by Cal Poly’s own Greek Life policies requiring registration for such events. These alcohol-centered parties are the primary source of neighborhood disruptions, drawing large crowds, creating excessive noise, and requiring repeated police intervention, at the expense of the City and its residents. This problem is not new. In 2015, following the St. Fratty’s Day incident that drew thousands of students to an off-campus fraternity party at 348 Hathway and caused a roof collapse with multiple injuries, Cal Poly officials, including President Jeffrey Armstrong, publicly proposed creating an on-campus “Greek Village.” At that time, both Mayor Jan Marx and neighborhood leaders supported the idea, recognizing that on-campus Greek housing would promote safety, accountability, and relieve pressure on residential neighborhoods. The university incorporated the concept into its Master Plan discussions and described it as part of a broader “specialty housing” initiative. It was addressed again in 2019. Yet years later, no Greek Village has been built, and the plan appears to have been abandoned. Cal Poly has the largest fraternity membership of any other CSU and continues to recruit new fraternities to its campus. 20% of Cal Poly students are involved in Greek Life, therefore, increased student enrollment will result in more fraternity and sorority members. (Sororities are not allowed to host parties with alcohol so they go to the fraternities to party.) During Cal Poly’s presentation to the SCLC on September 18, 2025, Anthony Palazzo, Executive Director of Facilities Management and Development, confirmed that the university is not planning to build a Greek Row, stating that “the finances aren’t there.” He suggested that fraternities might instead be assigned “a building or a floor within a building” in new residence halls which is an inadequate solution that fails to meet the practical needs of these organizations or the City’s neighborhoods. Cal Poly plans to require first- and second-year students to live on campus, but fraternity membership spans all four years. Most fraternity officers and many active members are juniors and seniors who are not eligible for on-campus housing. Without a designated place on campus, they have rented houses and operate their fraternities off-campus in residential neighborhoods, where large, alcohol-fueled gatherings repeatedly disturb residents and demand costly resources from the City, including police and code enforcement. Meanwhile, Cal Poly is investing $1.3 billion in new student housing projects, a water treatment facility, and other sustainability initiatives and infrastructure. If the university can finance these projects, it can 1 and should allocate space for fraternity housing. A well-planned, university-managed Fraternity Row or Greek Village would provide a safe, accountable environment for these organizations and end the ongoing disruption to City neighborhoods. There are many potential solutions and a task force could be formed to explore the possibilities. For instance, it's possible that fraternities could raise the money for building their house if the land on campus is offered to accommodate each fraternity house. The City’s residents should not continue to absorb the impacts of Cal Poly’s decision to exclude fraternities from its campus housing strategy. I urge the Council to press Cal Poly to reinstate and prioritize the Greek Village concept in its Master Plan. Fraternities should have their social fraternity houses on campus, not in the City’s neighborhoods. Respectfully, Kathie Walker 2