HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/20/1991, C-7 - TRANSIT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR A ROUTE SUBSIDY ON SLO TRANSIT �iIII�InIIIIVI��������llll�l�� v� MEETING GA :
c�
I►i►��►►I o san lues oBispo =�-
—21
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER: . �y
FROM: Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administr tive Officer r;��—
Prepared by Harry Watson, Transit Manager
SUBJECT: Transit agreement between the trustees of California
State University California Polytechnic State University and the
City of San Luis Obispo for a route subsidy on SLO Transit
CAO RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve and authorize the Mayor to
execute a transit agreement between the trustees of California
State University, California Polytechnic State University and the
City of San Luis Obispo for the route subsidy of SLO Transit in the
amount of $135, 132 for FY 1991-92.
DISCUSSION:
For several years there has been a successful program wherein Cal
Poly students and faculty have been riding SLO Transit without
paying a fare at the farebox. This has been accomplished by our
drivers acknowledging their possession of a current student body
ID card or faculty ID card. This mutually agreeable relationship
has been beneficial to both the University student body and faculty
and to the City.
A new farebox amount of $135, 132. 00 has been successfully
negotiated with the representatives of the University as their
contribution for the services that will be rendered during the next
fiscal year. The amount for services rendered for fiscal year
1990-91 was in the approximate amount of $98, 325. 00. The increase
in the farebox being charged to the University is the result of
both increased ridership by Cal Poly students and faculty and a
formulated and negotiated ridership versus cost factor as spelled
out in the agreement and as outlined under the Fiscal Impact
section.
S.L.O. Transit experienced a 33% increase in Cal Poly ridership in
FY 1990-91, the year on which this agreement is based.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The formula used to calculate the Cal Poly farebox as stated in the
Transit Agreement, simply put is the total ridership on SLO Transit
over the past twelve months of 651, 520 (up 23% over FY 89-90) , less
the non-Cal Poly passengers of 242, 030, which equals 409 ,490 Cal
Poly passengers. The graduated fee per rider is now $. 33 per the
agreement, so $. 33 X 409, 490 passengers equals $135, 132. 00.
►�►����N��►►IIIII�p��u�gIUl11 city of san Luis oBispo
A COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Two
The five year history of the Cal Poly farebox has been:
90-91 $98, 325. 00
89-90 88, 000. 00
88-89 74, 000. 00
87-88 68, 000. 00
86-87 67,000. 00
The approved Transit budget for Fiscal Year 1991-92 is in the
amount of $655, 300. The farebox is projected to be $175, 000, or
37% of the cost of operating the system. Cal Poly students account
for 71% of our ridership. The negotiated farebox for FY 90-91 for
Cal Poly accounts for 77% of our projected farebox total.
The increased farebox paid by Cal Poly will assist SLO Transit in
maintaining one of the highest farebox ratios being enjoyed by any
non-urban transit system in California.
ATTACHMENT:
Agreement
I
41A CONTRACT' 'SER AM. NO. ❑ CONTRACTOR
APPROVED BY THE
AGREEMEN - ATTORNEY GENERAL P200'c ❑ STATE AGENCY
CONTRACTOR'S STATE I.D. NUMBER ❑ DEPT. OF GEN. SE.
❑ CONTROLLER
11
'HIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 1St day of July 91. 19 ❑
the State of California, by and between State of California, through its duly elected or appointed, ❑
qualified and acting
TITLE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE AGENCY Cal Poly State University
Procurement & Support Services San Luis Obispo hereafter called the State, and
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT SYSTEM hereafter called the Contractor.
WITNESSETH: That the Contractor for and in consid,�ation of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the Stat(
hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree to furnish.to 06Stueservices and materials, as follows:
(Set forth service to be rendered by Contractor,amount to be paid Contractor,time for performance or completion,and attach plans and specifications,if any.)
CAL POLY/CITY NO FARE PROGRAM AGREEMENT TRANSIT SYSTEM
The attachment EXHIBIT "All hereto is made a part of this agreement
by reference thereto.
The term of this agreement is from July 1, 1991 through June 30,
1992.
The Fiscal Year 1991-92 Fee Calculation . is using the 409,490
ridership at $.33 . Total amount payable on this agreement shall
not exceed One Hundred Thirty Five Thousand One Hundred Thirty Two
Dollars ($135, 132.00) .
CONTINUED ON _ SHEETS, EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR AND CONTRACT NUMBER.
The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the date first above written
STATE OF CAUFORNIA CONTRACTOR
AGENCY Cal Poly State T ty CONTRACTOR(v DTkM TIV.H AN iM AL STATE M WMKF A Cdl►ONATKW.
San Luis Ob' 3407 CIT 0P SIN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT SYSTEM
BY(AUTHORIZED BY(AUTNORQBD SIGNATURID
X X
PRINTED NAME OF4PERSON SIGNINS JPRINTED NAME AND T"LB OF PERSON SIGNING
Ray Macias
TITLE
ESS
Procurement & Support Services Officer Palm• Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8100
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY PROGRAM/CATEGORY(COOK AND TITLE) FUND TITLE
THIS
1 5 132 00 Bus Proram" 1991-92 DRF/Parking Department of General Services
S (OPTIONAL Uses Use Only
PRIOR ENCUMBERED
FOROR THIS Vice President for Business Affairs/J: R. Land th
THIS CONTRACT
ITEM CHAPTER STATUTE FISCAL YEAR
TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBER Educ Code 99079 91 91-92
TO DATE OBJECT OR �ENDITURB(COOS AND TITLE)
$ 4-57108-5520 / Pkg.-City Bus-Indep Ops
`ereby certify upon my oum personal knowledge that budgeted funds are T.B.A.NO. B.R.No.
table for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above.
r ATURK OF ACCOUNTING CPFICKR DATE
X �: ;?f 3
.. .:.>;i.:a.:.:ad[LI.1w:1:W:i::[:[:>::.a:::IO.•.•.:::::,:i :! .iJJ.:. •.:;�:ism:::::9ala�u:vw+n:LV:`:K �rG�:wtiiiw...�LOini �i:ilu!i)i!JbiN128a mJ.0.. TJ:461Ju:wL.ba:::::•:::
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT SYSTEM
AGREEMENT NO. P200271
PAGE 2
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE: Contractor will sign a Statement of
Compliance that certified under the Penalty of Perjury under the
laws of the State of California that the contractor has, unless
exempted, complied with the nondiscrimination program requirements
of Government Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Code of
Regulations, Section 8103. If the Statement of Compliance is not
signed by the person authorized to enter this agreement, this
agreement is void.
DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE: During the performance of this agreement, :
contractor and its subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate
against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,
religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap,
contractors and subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and
treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of
such discrimination. Contractors and subcontractors shall comply
with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act
(Government Code, Section 12290 et seq.) and the applicable
regulations promulgated thereunder (California Administrative Code,
Title 2, Section 7285.0 et seq. ) . The applicabld regulations of
the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government
Code, Section 12990, set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title2
of the California Administrative Code are incorporated into this
agreement by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in
full, contractor and its subcontractors shall give written notice
of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with
which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement.
This Contractor shall include nondiscrimination and compliance
provisions of this clause in all subcontractors to perform work
under this agreement.
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION: By signing this agreement, the
contractor hereby certified under penalty of perjury under the laws
of the State of California that the contractor will comply with the
requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government
Code Section 8350 et seq. ) and will provide a drug-free workplace
by performing all the requirements including in Exhibit E. Failure
to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of
payments under the contract of termination of the agreement or both
and the contractor may be ineligible for award of any future State
contracts if the department dertermines that any of -the following
has occured: (1) the contractor has made false certification or (2)
violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements
as noted in Attachment E.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT SYSTEM
AGREEMENT No. P200271
PAGE 3
CONTRACTORS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CERTIFICATION: By
signing this agreement the contractor certified that no more than
one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a Federal
Court has been issued against the contractor within the immediately
preceding two-year period because of the contractor's failure to
comply with an order of a Federal court which ordered the
contractor to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations
Board (Public Contract Code Section 10296) .
ExAMINATION AND AUDIT OF CONTRACTING PARTIES: The contracting
parties shall be subject to the examination and audit of the :
Auditor General for a period of three years after final payment
under the Agreement. The examination and audit shall be confined
to those matters with the performance of the contract, including,
but not limited to, the costs of administering the contract.
....... ..FuuF.rw ti��irrVj�Frrrrw•.w..w r.ww.....rwwn w..ww-...ry ,I•I rIWr••I•••..•. JIJ-��ir..�r�lJ.� ru wwwr..liVJV UU\::.r:rl.l.0 WJv\r.r Wf.uJJf........
........w.......... .f.A)r.r.r.....r rJ..wrw.rrr...rrflYGr .....
EXHIBIT A
State of California California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ray Macias DATE: June 12, 1991
Procurement&.Support Servi Officer
FILE NO:
COPIES: F. Lebens
D. Gerard
R. Brug
J. Risser
K. Ikeda
FROM: Jam dr
V"I Pr nt fo Business Affairs
SUBJECT: A GREEMENT B EN UNIVERSITY AND SLO TRANSIT
As a number of you know, Harry Watson, Transit Manager for SLO Transit, wrote to me on April 19,
1991, while the material was received on campus May 24, 1991, concerning an agreement between the
University and SLO Transit for free bus service for students, faculty and staff. The correspondence, a
copy of which is attached, was much more positive than the feedback that I received from the original
March 4 meeting which Kimi and you had with Harry. What Harry proposed was to extend our
agreement with SLO Transit for one year using current year's ridership of 409,490 rides times $.33 per
ride for total standard agreement cost for 1991/92 of$135,132. He said that this is a compromise in
terms of after fare box cost of$.35 per passenger which applied to our data would have resulted in ana
greement of$143,322. I was very pleased to see that he recognized that the bulk of university riders are
SLO residents.
I was attempting to negotiate with Harry a multiple year contract rather than just one for 1991/92, using
the penny per ride increase concept. However, in view of the many unanswered financial variables he
was not willing at this time to put in place a mulqI. ear_agreement. Tli�eiefo"re Fwould'y'ou plea5e;pi pare
.
ia-_Standard;Agreement_u 's.in.g..the.409,490rrdeiihipat$:33'fo a�tal:o, $..35;132-1 REMy 1991192'-
IT
In addition;Harryand-I discussed the fact that discussions for the 1992/93 contract should be calendared
for initial consideration in December 1991. Please put that date on your calendar.
. •..•:...•. r..Y•iYY..Yr. r...r.M.lwl YtGpnL M...... --...
..... .............l.:il:::...r.r. rr'JYN 1i�ww::.r....rr........... .........:
EXHIBIT A
I � SII II�
ty OSAn luIS OBIS O
990 Palm Street/Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis.Obispo, CA 93403-8100
1
April 19, 1991 €�
MAY 2 4 1991
James R. Landreth
Vice President for Business Affairs BUSINESS AFFAIRS
Cal Poly University
San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Dear Mr. Landreth:
It doesn't seem possible that nearly a year has passed since we last met to discuss
the joint cooperative effort between the University and SLO Transit.
In preparation for this year's meeting I enjoyed a preliminary meeting with your Klmi
Morita and Ray Macias on March 4 of this year. Due to endeavors both at the
University level and at SLO Transit's level, we have a much better understanding of who
is using the system, where they are going, and what they perceive the need to be in
having the transit system meet their needs. Late last spring Dr. Ed Sullivan devoted
the entire lab effort of his Transportation Engineering course to do an in-depth survey
of Cal Poly ridership in an effort to ascertain both the current level of service and the
unmet transit needs as perceived by Cal Poly riders. The fruits of that labor were most
enlightening in that over 900 individual requests for additional service resulted from the
survey team monitoring the three routes that currently serve Cal Poly. A copy of the
results is attached.
The City has embarked on a five year short range transit plan using the highly
respected consulting firm of Nelson/Nygaard. Part of their effort was an in-depth origin
and destination survey of all current riders on all routes. Attachments 1 through 5 are
the graphic findings by route, and system total, of who makes up SLO Transit's
ridership. You can see that Cal Poly accounts for a spread of from 21% on route 3
to a high of 91% of route 4's ridership with an overall system Cal Poly ridership of 71%.
An example of the origin of destination information provided in the plan is the example
listed as Attachment 6 showing where the riders board a particular route, in this case
route 2 and in what numbers at each location they board the route. it is interesting to
note on Attachment 6 that most of the stops all along the route pick up from 25 to 49
riders per location with several accounting for 100 to 199 riders per location with their
destination being Cal Poly campus.
EXHIBIT A
Page Two - Landreth
Further evidence of the joint effort to meet the needs of the student population are the
results of the Community/University Task Force wherein the results spell out that "the
City should continue to work closely with Cal Poly and Cuesta to create improved bus
schedules and incentive programs that encourage high levels of student usage by the
Transit system'. One of Cal Poly's directives from this effort was that "Cal Poly should
continue to participate-in funding the City's Transit Program, and be willing to pay
appropriate cost for those services. Cal Poly should work closely with the City and
San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority to create improved bus schedules and
incentive programs that will encourage high levels of student usage of the transit
system. Cal Poly should set an annual target for reduction of campus destination
automobile trips and develop and implementing program."
Many of these same goals will be evident when the final mandate comes out from the
Air Pollution Control District (APCD) on their trip reduction ordinance. The target goal
currently stands at 1.7 occupants per vehicle which could result in a mandated
reduction of trips to-campus of 40 to 50%. The APCD is looking towards transit as
being a major component in allowing both public and private entities to meet the
mandates when they become effective. For this reason it would behoove all of us that
are directly and indirectly in the people moving business to do all that we can to affect
changes in commuting habits from the private automobile to other means of
transportation in advance of the time when we are mandated to do so.
Our current Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Transit contract.dates back to July 1, 1987 and
called for a per passenger Cal Poly contribution of $.29. Over the years that has
graduated up to the existing contract amount of $.32 per passenger. The contractual
costs to the City of San Luis Obispo for the transit service provided by our private
enterprise vendor has risen disproportionately to the Cal Poly/SLO contract Our
current year cost per passenger before farebox is $.59 per passenger and after farebox
cost is $.35 per passenger. Preliminary investigations of the indexes which drive the
cost of the renumeration of our contract indicate that this year the increases will be
higher than the increases of recent years primarily being driven by the cost of fuel.
An analysis of ridership on the system coming out of our Short Range Transit Plan (see
Attachment 7) shows that 71% of the ridership on the system is Cal Poly students and
staff. The ridership in the last calendar year for the system was 651,520 passengers
(bus only 576,747). Seventy-one percent of that number is Cal Poly ridership at
0 for last calendar year. If we took a continuation of the former practice of
increasing Cal Poly's participation at the rate of $.01 a year per rider, $.33 per rider
times the 409,490 Poly riders last year comes out to $135,132. If we look at the actual _
after farebox cost of $.35 cost per passenger times the 409,490 Cal Poly riders per
year, the result is $143,322. Again, this cost is based on this year's expense, not what
it is expected to be next year.
C'-74
.................... . ... ... .. w.w...GJ:w::..... �•+.►�........ ....n.....,.-__--••'_ ......L•L'Lti1....-.:.�.i'�v.. .... ........,. -w.a..............,.................
EXHIBIT A
Page Three - Landreth
Credit must be given to the fact that many of the SLO Transit/Poly riders are SLO City
residents. In addition, the many exceptions to City residency must be recognized,
among which are the 2200 students that live on campus. Also a sizeable number come
from other areas, park in shopping centers and on the street and use SLO Transit to
continue onto campus to beat the cost of parking and the hassle.
In light of the uncertain budget position that the University finds itself in at this time, it
is prudent to extend our current practice of increasing the per passenger rate by one
penny to $.33 for Fiscal Year 1991-92. As has been our agreed practice in prior years,
using last year's Poly ridership the contract amount for San Luis Obispo Transit service
to Cal Poly will be $135,132 for Fiscal Year 1991-92.
Should you have any questions, please contact me (549-7121). Thanks for your
continued cooperation with this successful program. We look forward to receiving a
new standard agreement to cover the upcoming fiscal year. As soon as it arrives, we
will take it to the City Council for their approval.
Best regards,
N
Harry Watson
Transit Manager
HW:bw
landreth
EXHIBIT A
y
E
d
o
a C
d _m
U
xa
C) O)
c o
J � I
= co
0 '^
0 a.
O
a
J R
a. rn
J
Q QO
U
_o
� r C
Q. m
�+ co
r
cc T r T
LL V
C lcl
CD
T d
CC
C7 N
Q3 ? c e
U `1
m WF-
IL
u. o a
m �
Von w a) U
d cc Z
F. cc
IR W Q
O c•)
cc 0
O
A C
m
7 U)
a
(D
Q ,
Z
0
U)
Z
m a
O L lA
co 0 c`7
a c �,%
a
rz
m L l0
U U
T
Q
6
,YQ
N
Q Il)
N
0
O
C
Q)
cf)
ATTACHMENT 1
7-r o
��l.:�Jw..�.:::::::::.::�:�. .... ........�\Y:.:.ii�.�...4���\�N.a--.w��w A�w•wH.H..-.................r..r.r Y...�..�...Y..rwY........��ww........................r.............� ..........-......
EXHIBIT A
0
v
- u7
1cis
73
rn
1 m
e
N
1CD
L
Z Q
Z to
o a
L
+ g U
N
U
CL o
.T. cn
cc
� d
is
o
LL N o d N
ill 7
N c9 i7� o U
W
rn
� U
H
o
cc ccW
cr
LL c L
I m O
N
CD
N
l U o N
O
I e 2 d
o Q
o ca
ca7
OJ O
O L CA
l a o
UCD
I J L o
J U m
2
O o �`
I Oa
U-
13
N � U
es
I �
0
.2
ci
U
ATTACHMENT 2
.......................... ................ ... ... ......._._.._._.._,..,.,.�....._..,............... .........__•_ ... EXHIBIT A
cc
75
a
Iz
1
0
Q
cc m
W L
O
� s
_m
O L
m U
ci
NQs
Q
CL O
a O co
>, c :3y e R O1
t. O N U m
t4 2
LL O o
G �
� m
U-) m L_
(V y H O
Q C 0 v
w
c4 m m
L` m L
v .
cli
1
� � N
1 [[ C O
75 ai a
a, B
1 cc
Q y G
N
_O
C
1 Q m
1 O Cn
l Q
m
c0
O o
U)
= m
0 O
vi
I
Q o •
n
G
CD
O
Z CL
U
yo U
� CV
N
O
C
cn ATTACHMENT 3
...,.11•�L:IY:IY:Ct IY:�::::..:.::.::::..............r4ir:.....:-.�-..w.:..:.::tw.`.....r..rr-.......r.......�, � �.n...-r�..+t....4.yr........r...................-.........__..._.._......�.._..... .. .
EXHIBIT A
Figure 3-31
Route 4 Boardings by Faretype
4. MADONNA-FOOTHILL LOOP (including tandems)
Senior-Disabled: 2% Children-Other: 1%
egular: 6%
{ Cal Poly: 91%
1
1
l
( ATTACHMENT 4
1
... ....................
..':'::. ...........--�--��..r�..�.�.� .� ...��.�......
EXHIBIT A
Figure 3-3
SYSTEMWIDE RIDERSHIP BY FARE TY.
Senior-Disabled: Children/Other: 1%
Regular: 19%
Cal Poly: 71%
ATTACHMENT 5
EXHIBIT A
Figure 3-4
LL.
d 3: Ic
-N t H
•` _ a t r•
Lr O O / IPA i
U ca
_ n•W 10
N• ,OrI
U.
1p
Grand
• �� �-f� t � I is N
LO Y { J ■ Y -E� .�1 J
< 0 •• a •1 /� _ •.••
CL > N
• tm a
J . N
` 4
Grotto:'•�\QO�~-� ..�'. ip ��• \K a0
•, g$ y`� Os T Q�� �- ,pnB�
O
pc E
' SSS\S m W• `(,•O v a yLU �• .� .
- r • s ' f
:i •'f,r V d
Nt
♦ �9�..I l .- rte.._.
/o0 c7i
u . tt7 r• N
LLI
LA m
cla
w PO
0 cm
O a /:�� It ' •
ATTACHMENT 6
y �S,
EXHIBIT A
The high concentration of boardings in the Laguna Lake area is
especially notable, given its remoteness from the campus . The
erect service to the campus via Route 4 accounts For mo t of
these boardings, even though the route operates in only one
direction, with a longer return trip through downtown.
It appears that good, direct transit service enables Cal Poly
students reaterflexibilityin c oosin ousin ocations, as
well as attorcUng greater mobility choices. The tact that Po=Y
boardings are so decentralized indicates that students an
dN faculty are not centered in isolated pockets, but rather are an
integrated part o e city.
Senior and disabled passengers are almost evenly distributed
across the four route branches that do not serve Cal Poly. These
include the Madonna branch of Route 2, the Broad-Johnson branch
of Route :l and both branches of the Route 3, with 45-65 daily
boardings on each of these branches . On Route 4 and on .the
branches of Routes 1 and 2 serving Cal Poly, senior and disabled
ridership is much lighter, accounting for only 15-25 daily
boardings.
Regular-fare passengers are distributed much like senior and
disabled passengers . The route branches that do not serve Cal
Poly all experienced more daily boardings than those that do.
Figure 3-5 shows all boarding locations with 6 or more senior=
disabled boardings recorded during the ride check. Figure 3-6
shows all locations with 6 or more regular fare passengers . Both
the regular fare and senior-disabled boardings showed
concentrations in the following areas :
• Stops in the downtown shopping areas around the transit
center.
• The Madonna corridor of Routes 2 and 4 , especially Laguna
Plaza (Los Osos Valley & Madonna) , Central Coast Plaza, and
the stop near Highway 101 .
• Laguna Junior High School (regular fare passengers )
• The Johnson-Augusta corridor of Routes 1 and 3 .
• The Greyhound station on South Street.
Though no data on trip purposes was taken, the distribution of
boardings suggests that trips in the regular and senior-disabled
fare categories are oriented toward shopping destinations . The
hospitals in the Johnson-Augusta corridor are also significant
factors in the non-Poly ridership there.
3-9
2-746
fhT7AGt4m5-f tT 7 EXHIBIT A
Item No. 4
OPERATIONS REPORT
(unaudited)
Ridership RT 1 RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 TR TOTAL
January 17,395 15,641 9,136 20,093 0 62.266
Miles 18,370
Cost•. 529,670.00
February. 14,535 14,257 8,514 17,230 0 54,536
Miles: f4 7,860
Cost: 528,940.00
March 12,378 14,084 9,355 13,246 0 49.063
Miles: 18,328
Cost: 530,194.00, including Bus Lease
April 14,786 15,292 8,803 17,374 0 56,255
Miles: 18,847
Cost: 533,005.00, including Bus Lease
May 15,098 15,791 9,304 17,865 0 58,058
Miles: 18,822
Cost s33,560.00, including $1150 for Bus Lease
June 9,656 11,928 8,092 8.912 0 38,598
Miles: 17,606
Cost 530,240.00, Including Bus Lease
July • 8,796 11,135 8,040 5,730 18,967 52,668
Miles: 17,841
Cost $30,288.00, including Trolley Operation, No Trolley Rent
August 9,164 11,759 8,507 5,940 18,245 53,615
Miles: 16,840
Cost: S30,91 1.00. No Trolley Rent Included
September 10,372 12,746 8,357 9,783 10,445 51,703
Miles: 18,395
Cost 533,341.21
October 18,600 18,367 10,873 20,749 9,688 78,27
Miles: 21,256
Cost: 536,255.32
EXHIBIT A
Page No. 1
07/31/90
CE424 -- Spring 1990
SLO Transit Study
Summary 'of Riders' Comments
Buses should at least five more minutes in U.U. , especially route 1.
It will be easy and convenient for students.
1. Cal Poly stops from :00 -:15 for people just getting out of a
class on the hour.
2. retain "student ride free" program (local)
More weekend routes. More weeknight routes.
SLO Transit is always on time and goes to many places, but I wish the
times it ran were longer at night to help me get back home, Perhaps
until 10pm every night.
Wish I could catch it home 5 min past the hour (instead of .45 min) .
Sometimes route is too early and I miss the bus.
If possible, two more routes available from 8-9 and 3-4pm.
I wish more times for pick-up from campus was available.
more frequent buses
Extended hours at night
Should run more often. Convoluted routes that go everywhere but
where you want to go are very inconvenient.
I have found the drivers very polite and considerate, consciencious
about their driving and concerns for passengers at all times.
Better drivers, more like Les, Roberta and Anna--courteous, friendly,
safe drivers. Rt. 2 and 1 run later at night Rt. 1 on weekends.
Run til a later hour.
It gets me where I want to go.
Should have buses arrive more than once an hour.
It would help if buses ran every 1/2 hour, meaning arriving at the
same destination every 1/2 hour rather than an hour.
Run buses east/west and north/south
A route 2 bus leaving Poly sooner after the hour, :44 is too late.
Longer hours on the weekend. Routes (regular) to the airports.
Summer routes to Avila Beach. Bicycle racks on the back of the bus.
EXHIBIT P
Page No. 2
.07/31/90
CE424 -- Spring 1990
SLO Transit Study
Summary:.mar : of Riders' Comments
SLO transit does a satisfactory job in meeting my needs. I understand
that there needs to be a great demand to expand bus routes during
evening hours and weekends, but i still think an increase in bus
service at those times would be a plus. (much needed) .
Just grateful the drivers will stop at that "isolated" location. It
beats walking 2.5 miles to take care of livestock every other day.
Make routes to Avila Beach
Routes 1 & 2 run early or late - very rare that they are on time in
the last year. If you need to get to class or work on time, you need
to take the bus an hour early to ensure this. The company seems to
have forgotten that Poly students are their biggest customers, and
they are paid by the school.
Service is quite good - very fast.
Very on time, safe, convenient for students.
Poly ID is great.
Very good and comfortable, maybe on time more often.
This a great service for me, it saves money in gas and parking
permits and saves time. I appreciate being able to ride free with
Poly ID.
Good, I like the Cal Poly service.
Great - more buses in the a.m.
Splendid
We need more buses to and from Poly in the morning (8-10 a.m. ) and
afternoon (3-6) during the peak usage times. It's like a can of
sardines then for the students and the elderly can't ride. Consider
this an official complaint. Help us.
Very well.
It is very convenient for Valencia residents to have a bus that stops
15 min. before & 15 min. after the hour.
Convenient
Needs met fairly well.
Needs higher frequency of buses.
Need more cautious drivers. The drivers are wild.
EXHIBIT A
Page No. 3
07/31/90 CE424 Spring 1990
sLo Transit Study
Smeary 'of Riders' Comments
Excellent transit & very clean.
Friendlier drivers! ! ! ! o
Perhaps a shuttle from the airport to city hall
Great service! ! '-
earlier so I'm not late for class
Have the buses arrive
is too close when changing at city hall. I have missed buses
Schedule
because of this reason
Doesn't run often enough
Great.
I do not use the bus every day but have always found the bus met my
I do not drive so I take the bus or walk
needs when I use it.
Service to SLO County Airport to downtown SLO.
We are doing training
for special education students and your drivers
are very accomodating.
Great Service! '. !
Very good.
n later & on weekends, 24 hours.
It's great! All route should ru
Be lost without it.
Can't complain.
-SHOULD RUN MORE BUSSES HIGHER FREQUENCY
FINDS IT VERY CONVIENT FOR TRIER NEEDS BUT WOULD LIKE TO SEE BUSSES
RUN LATER AT NIGHT
VERY GOOD
NEED MORE RUNS AND RUN THEM LATER•PEOPLE GET STRANDED AT NIGHT
THE SYSTEM YEARS ASGO,KEEP UP THE GOOD
IS MUCH BETER THEN IT WAS TWO
WORK
VERY GOOD EXCELLENT ER 7 AND THIS
ATHEY SHOULD RUN LATER
RUNS TILL 10 THERE SHOULD
ONLY ONE ROUTERuNS
T
BE TWO BUSSES
EXHIBIT A
Page No. 4
07/31/90
CE424 -- Spring 1990
SLO Transit Study
Summary -of Riders' Comments
NEED MORE RESIDENTAL ROUTES NEED BUS TO GO TO POLY EARLIER
NOT ENOUGH ROOM ON THE BUSSES IN THE MORNING WHEN THEY GET CLOSE TO
CAMPUS
MORE BUSSES ON WEEKENDS
SHOULD HAVE MORE MORNING RUNS ON ROUTE FOUR
CERTAIN DRIVERS ARE RECKLESS AT TIMES. THEY CAN ALSO BE
DISCOURTEOUS. BRAKES COULD BE BETTER MAINTAINED.
SERVICE IS TOO INFREQUENT
BUS SHOULD STAY LONGER AT THE AG. STOP, MAYBE SPEND LESS TIME AT THE
U.U.
TAKES TOO LONG TO GET FROM POLY TO LAGUNA IF YOU CAN'T GET ROUTE 2 AT
45 AFTER THE HOUR. ROUTE FOUR NIGHT DRIVER IS DANGEROUS! ! !
COULD RUN A LITTLE MORE OFTEN
MORE BUSES TO POLY IN THE MORNING, ESPECIALLY IN THE WINTER
MORE BUSES ON THE HALF HOUR FOR POLY
BUS NEEDS TO RUN UNTIL AT LEAST 11:00 P.M. FOR THOSE STUDENTS WHO
STUDY IN THE LIBRARY AND U.U.
NEED 30-MINUTE LOOP
Very good. Enjoy buses and drivers.
It meets may needs very well
I feel it meets my needs efficiently
Need more buses.
Coordinate bus/class schedules. Bumpy rides on buses.
I enjoy talking to bus drivers
Good service for free.
Smoother rides.
System is very convenient.
Need a more direct route from Laguna to Poly. .
NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE
(OCP - 2)
1 . During the performance of this contract, the recipient,
contractor and its subcontractors shall not deny the
contract's benefits to any person on the basis of religion,
color, ethnic group identification, sex, age, physical or
mental disability, nor shall they discriminate unlawfully
a othst any employee or applicant for employment because
OT race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry,
physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition,
marital status, age or sex. Contractor shall insure that
the evaluation and treatment of employees and .applicants
for employment are free of such discrimination.
2. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of the. Fair
Employment and Housing Act (Government Code, Section
12900 et seq. ), the regulations promulgated thereunder
(California Administrative Code, Title 2, Section 7285,0
et seq. ), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1,
Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Government
Code, Sections 11135-11139.5)_ and the regulations or stand-
ards adopted by the awarding State agency to implement such
article.
3. Recipient, contractor and its subcontractors shall give
written notice of their obligations under this clause to
labor organizations with which they have a collective
bargaining or other agreement .
4. The contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and
compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts
to perform work under the contract.
srn. 27B (NEW s-631
ATTACHMENT E
State of California
DRUG-FREE WORIKELACE CERTMCATION
std. 21 (new 11-90)
C++Parry/orpnizzaon Name
The contractor or grant recipient named above hereby certifies compliance with Government Code
Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug-free workplace. The above named contractor
will:
1. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture,distribution,dispensation,
possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken
against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a).
2 Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code 8355(b), to
inform employees about all of the following.
(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
(b) The person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace,
(c) Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs, and
(d) Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
3. Provide as required by Government Code Section 8355(c) that every employee who works on
the proposed contract or grant:
(a) Will receive a copy of the company's drug-free policy statement, and
(b) Will agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of
employment on the contract or grant.
CERTIFICATION
I, the official named below, hereby swear that I am duly authorized legally to bind the contractor
or grant recipient to the above described certification. I am fully aware that this certification,
executed on the date and in the county below, is made under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of California.
official's Name
John Dunn _
Date Executed Executed in the County of
San Luis Obispo
Contractor or Grant Rcci -nt Signatum
U
Title
inistrative Officer
Federal I.D.Dumber
95-6000781
EXHIBIT A
Page No. 5
07/31/90
CE424 =- Spring 1990
SLO Transit Study
Summary of Riders' Comments
I am grateful for the extended bus service hours of Route 4
The buses should run more often.
Need better drivers and more routes.
Late service on Routes 1,2 and 3.
Route 4 on weekends.
Route 2 is not on schedule a lot.
Need more frequent routes.
Need more frequent routes.
Extend Route 4 until 11 p.m. (when the library closes) .
Extend evening weekend hours.
Keep Route 4 's extended hours.
One of the bus drivers is bad and should be relieved.
ROUTE 3 IS ALWAYS LATE
z-a�f
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
STD. 19 (Rev. 3.87)
COMPANY NAME
The company named above (hereinafter referred to as "prospective contractor") hereby certifies, unless
specifically exempted, compliance with Government Code Section 12990 and California Administrative Code,
Title 2, Division 4, Chapter 5 in matters relating to the development, implementation and maintenance of a
nondiscrimination program. Prospective contractor agrees not to unlawfully discriminate against any employee
or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap,
medical condition (cancer related), marital status, sex or age (over forty).
CERTIFICATION
I, the official named below, hereby swear that I am duly authorized to legally bind the prospective contract
the above described certification. I am fully aware that this certification, executed on the date and in the county
below, is made under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California.
NAME OF OFFICIAL
John Dunn
DATE EXECUTED EXECUTED IN THE COUNTY OF
San Luis Obispo
PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR $IG TURE��_
�\CA- a
PROSPECTIVE CO TITLE
City Administrative Officer
PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR FEDERAL EMPLOYER I.D. NUMBER
95-6000781
AA v .nn
J7