HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6c. Abandonment of a Portion of Church Street Right-of-Way at 1804 Osos Street Item 6c
Department: Community Development
Cost Center: 4003
For Agenda of: 12/2/2025
Placement: Public Hearing
Estimated Time: 15 Minutes
FROM: Timmi Tway, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Gabriel Munoz-Morris, Supervising Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF CHURCH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
AT 1804 OSOS STREET
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo, California, abandoning a 6 -foot-wide portion of Church Street
public right-of-way adjacent to 1804 Osos Street” and authorize recordation once
conditions of abandonment have been met.
2. Conduct a public hearing pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code
(CSHC) § 8320 et seq.
3. Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo, California, abandoning a 6 -foot-wide portion of Church Street
public right-of-way adjacent to 1804 Osos Street” and authorize recordation once
conditions of abandonment have been met.
POLICY CONTEXT
The abandonment of public right-of-way is required to be considered and approved by
the City Council following a public hearing pursuant to California Streets and Highways
Code (CSHC) § 8320 et seq.1
DISCUSSION
Background
On April 21, 2009, the City Council approved a vesting tentative map for Parcel Map SLO
07 0094 (TR 45-07) located at 1804 Osos Street and adopted Resolution No. 10074 (2009
Series) stating the City’s intent to abandon a portion of Church Street right -of-way to
facilitate infill development of the site (Attachment C – Vicinity Map). The approved
tentative map and the project’s Architectural Review Commission Approval ARC 45 -07
dated January 26, 2009, both show the abandoned right -of-way being incorporated into
the proposed development to allow for an enlarged sidewalk to allow for sidewalk dining
and expanded building footprints.
1 This abandonment is not eligible for summary vacation under the procedures of Streets & Highways
Code §8330-8336, so a public hearing is required.
Page 711 of 764
Item 6c
The portion of Church Street to be abandoned currently includes a public sidewalk. The
subdividers of Parcel Map SLO 07 0094 will eventually be relocating the sidewalk so it is
entirely within the remaining public right-of-way. Until such time as the sidewalk is
relocated, a temporary public pedestrian easement will be required.
Prior to Council approval, on February 25, 2009, the Planning Commission approved
Resolution No. 5518-09 (Attachment D) finding that the proposed abandonment of a
portion of Church Street was consistent with the General Plan. The findings of the
Planning Commission regarding the proposed abandonment remain valid and accurate,
including that the proposed area for abandonment is not needed for present or future
public purposes.
After the April 21, 2009, City Council action to adopt Resolution No. 10074 (2009 Series)
stating the City’s intent to abandon the portion of Church Street right -of-way, a public
hearing was scheduled for June 2, 2009, to finalize the abandonment of the portion of
right-of-way. That public hearing was postponed so that the City and applicant could
finalize the abandonment of the portion of right -of-way concurrently with an associated
real property transfer on Railroad Avenue, which was also associated with the
development. A public hearing was then scheduled for January 20, 2015 , to finalize the
abandonment of the portion of right-of-way and approve the real property exchange
agreement. Ultimately, the property exchange agreement was approved at that meeting
via City Council’s adoption of Resolution No. 10592 (2015 Series), but the public hearing
for the abandonment of the portion of right-of-way was postponed.
In anticipation of the public hearing on January 20, 2015, required notifications were sent
to the affected utility companies regarding the proposed abandonment. All of the utility
companies responded that they had no facilities within the area to be abandoned. In
addition, required public notices and postings were completed pursuant to the
requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code Sections 8320 to 8325 for
General Vacation procedures.
Page 712 of 764
Item 6c
In order to finalize the Real Property Exchange Agreement (Attachment E), the City
required that the developer also execute an Environmental Indemnity Agreement
(Attachment F) that protects the City from any liability due to the condition of the property
being transferred. In order to finalize the Real Property Exchange Agreement (Attachment
E), the City required that the Developer also execute an Environmental Indemnity
Agreement (Attachment F) that protects the City from any liability due to the condition of
the property being transferred. The Developer’s original lender was not willing to sign the
Environmental Indemnity Agreement so the document was never executed and the
property transfer did not occur in 2015. The Developer now has a new lender that is willing
to sign the Environmental Indemnity Agreement. Additionally, the Developer recently
completed patio improvements in the area that will be transferred via the Real Property
Exchange Agreement that serve a new business in the first story of one of the buildings.
In order to support the patio for the business, and complete the execution of the Real
Property Exchange Agreement, the Developer requested an administrative update to the
Real Property Exchange Agreement and associated Environmental Indemnity Agreement
for execution. While updating the Real Property Exchange Agreement and Environmental
Indemnity Agreement, staff discovered that the abandonment of the 6 -foot-wide portion
of Church Street was never finalized via adoption by the City Council of a Resolution of
Abandonment, and recordation of that Resolution. This abandonment by the City is
required to facilitate the Real Property Exchange Agreement.
Staff confirmed that the prior actions by the Planning Commission and City Council in
2009 to begin this right-of-way abandonment (including adoption of the Resolution of
intention to abandon) remain valid, and the abandonment may continue at this time per
the requirements for right-of-way abandonments of the California Streets and Highways
Code. Required notifications were sent to the affected utility companies regarding the
proposed abandonment again in August 2025, and all affected utility companies
confirmed that they did not have any facilities that would be affected by the proposed
abandonment. Required notifications were sent to the affected utility companies regarding
the proposed abandonment again in August2025, and all affected utility companies
confirmed that they did not have any facilities that would be affected by the proposed
abandonment. In addition, required public notices and postings were once again
completed pursuant to the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code
Sections 8320-8325 for General Vacation procedures.
Approving the Abandonment of a Portion of the Church Street Right-of-Way
The draft resolution approving the final abandonment (Attachments A & B) defines the
area of Church Street to be abandoned. The Streets and Highways Code requires that
the resolution be recorded once all conditions of the abandonment have been met,
thereby acknowledging that the vacation is complete. The draft resolution includes a
condition that a temporary pedestrian easement for the sidewalk be recorded concurrently
with the vacation. The draft resolution also authorizes the Mayor to accept this dedication.
Page 713 of 764
Item 6c
Abandonment Benefit to Owner and City
In some circumstances where street right-of-way is proposed for abandonment, the
additional property has value to the adjacent landowner. In this case, the abandonment
is part of a beneficial transaction to both the property owner and the City with the
subdividers of Parcel Map SLO 07-0094 to provide infill development and to complete
parking reconfiguration, accessible path of travel upgrades, sidewalk improvements,
landscaping and irrigation, signing and striping, and drainage improvements outlined in
the Real Property Exchange Agreement, which was previously approved by City Council
on January 20, 2015. The City is not required to demand payment in exchange for the
abandonment and is not doing so in this case.
Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
On April 21, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10074 (2009 Series) stating
the City’s intent to abandon the portion of Church Street right-of-way. On January 20,
2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10592 (2015 Series) approving the Real
Property Exchange Agreement and Environmental Indemnity Agreement.
Public Engagement
California Streets and Highways Code Section 8322 requires a legal ad be published in
the newspaper for at least two successive weeks prior to the public hearing. In addition,
Section 8323 requires that three notices be placed at the site at least two weeks prior to
the public hearing giving notice of the proposed abandonment. The notices must not be
more than 300-feet apart. The legal ad and notices at the site were all completed ahead
of this public hearing. In addition, Section 8324 requires that the City Council must allow
for public comment by interested parties at the public hearing.
CONCURRENCE
The Public Works Department concurs with the recommended action. The City Attorney’s
office has reviewed and approved as to the form the Real Property Exchange Agreement
and the Environmental Indemnity Agreement.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed vacation of the 6-foot-wide portion of Church Street right-of-way is exempt
from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Class 1 (Existing Facilities) exemption (§15301), as it involves a minor right -
of-way abandonment with no significant impact on land use or the environment. The
abandonment will not affect public access, or circulation. The abandonment is consistent
with the General Plan.
Page 714 of 764
Item 6c
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: N/A
Funding Identified: No
Fiscal Analysis:
Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $N/A $ $ $
State
Federal
Fees
Other:
Total N/A $ $ $
There is no cost to the City associated with this proposed abandonment. Once the
sidewalk is relocated, City street maintenance responsibilities for the abandoned portion
will be eliminated, which will lower maintenance costs on Church Street.
In addition, while the City does not pay property taxes for the land as a public agency, the
additional square footage that would be added to each of the adjacent properties would
be assessed by the County Assessor’s Office once the abandonment is complete and
could result in higher property taxes for each property owner.
ALTERNATIVES
Deny the proposed abandonment. If City Council denies the approval of the proposed
abandonment, the project as proposed by the subdividers of Parcel map 07 -0094 could
not be built in its approved configuration. This would be in conflict with the discretionary
approvals already granted to the subdividers by the City. The City would retain ongoing
maintenance responsibilities for the area that does not serve a public purpose.
Continue the item to a future meeting. The City Council could continue this item to a
future meeting and request more information of staff prior to approving the abandonment.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution abandoning a 6-foot-wide portion of Church Street public right-of-way
adjacent to 1804 Osos Street
B - Exhibits A and B to the Draft Resolution
C - Vicinity Map
D - Planning Commission Resolution No. 5518-09
E - Real Property Exchange Agreement
F - Environmental Indemnity Agreement
Page 715 of 764
Page 716 of 764
R 11561
RESOLUTION NO. _______ (2025 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, ABANDONING A 6-FOOT-WIDE PORTION OF
CHURCH STREET PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 1804 OSOS
STREET.
WHEREAS, Church Street is a 60-foot-wide public Right-of-Way between Osos
Street and its northerly terminus; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of San
Luis Obispo conducted on February 25, 2009, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution 5518-09 recommending abandonment of a 6-foot-wide portion of the Church
Street right-of-way and finding that the proposed abandonment is consistent with the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
conducted on April 21, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution 10074 (2009 Series)
indicating the City’s intent to abandon a 6-foot-wide portion of the Church Street right-of-
way; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing for the City Council to finalize the abandonment of
the 6-foot-wide portion of the Church Street right-of-way was agendized for June 2, 2009;
and
WHEREAS, the June 2, 2009 public hearing for the City Council to finalize the
abandonment of the 6-foot-wide portion of the Church Street right-of-way was postponed;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was scheduled for the City Council to finalize the
abandonment of the 6-foot-wide portion of Church Street right-of-way was agendized for
January 20, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the January 20, 2015 public hearing for the City Council to finalize the
abandonment of the 6-foot-wide portion of the Church Street right-of-way was postponed;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed abandonment of the 6-foot-wide portion of the Church
Street right-of-way must be finalized in order to complete the conditions of approval for
the approved development project at 1804 and 1814 Osos Street and finalize a real
property exchange agreement between the City and the developer of 1000 Railroad
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, City staff have confirmed that prior action by the Planning
Commission and City Council associated with the abandonment of this 6-foot-wide portion
of the Church Street right-of-way remain valid, and the abandonment process may be
Page 717 of 764
Resolution No. ______ (2025 Series) Page 2
R _______
continued at this time per the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code;
and
WHEREAS, City staff have confirmed that no City utility facilities currently exist
within the 6-foot-wide portion of the Church Street right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, City staff notified all public utility companies of the proposed
abandonment and no utility company has facilities that would be affected by the proposed
abandonment; and
WHEREAS, an existing public sidewalk will temporarily remain within the area of
the proposed abandonment until such time as it is relocated by the developer of Parcel
Map SLO 07-0094 at 1804 Osos Street; and
WHEREAS, all public notices have been provided as required by applicable law,
including California Streets & Highways Code §8320 et seq.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that:
SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all evidence, the City Council makes the
following findings:
1. The recitals stated above are found to be true and incorporated herein as findings
of the City Council.
2. The proposed right-of-way abandonment is in conformity with the City's General
Plan and any applicable Specific Plans or Zoning Regulations. The proposed
abandonment does not conflict with long-term land use, circulation, or
infrastructure plans, and the street is not identified as a key access route or
planned improvement area.
3. The proposed right-of-way abandonment is not presently or prospectively required
for public use or vehicular or pedestrian access. Based on a review of the City's
traffic circulation plans, public infrastructure needs, and adjacent property access,
it has been determined that the right -of-way serves no essential function in the
City’s transportation network.
4. The proposed right-of-way abandonment will not negatively impact public interest
or safety, including emergency vehicle access, utilities, or other critical public
services.
5. Utility companies with easement rights in the area have been provided notice of
the proposed abandonment and have confirmed that the abandonment will not
impact any existing utility infrastructure.
Page 718 of 764
Resolution No. ______ (2025 Series) Page 3
R _______
6. The abandonment of the 6-foot-wide portion of the Church Street right-of-way is
made pursuant to Sections 8320 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways
Code.
SECTION 2. Environmental Determination. The proposed vacation of the 6-foot-
wide portion of the Church Street right-of-way is exempt from environmental review under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Class 1 (Existing Facilities)
exemption (§15301), as it involves a minor right -of-way abandonment with no significant
impact on land use or the environment. The abandonment will not affect public access,
or circulation. The abandonment is consistent with the General Plan.
SECTION 3. Action. The City Council adopts a Resolution of Abandonment of a
6-foot-wide portion of the Church Street public right of way adjacent to 1804 Osos Street,
as more accurately described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto,
pursuant to Chapter 4, Part 3 of Division 9 of the California Streets and Highways Code
subject to the following conditions:
1. A temporary public pedestrian easement for the existing public sidewalk within the
area of Church Street to be abandoned shall be dedicated by the adjacent property
owners. Said offer of dedication shall record concurrently with this resolution. The
Mayor is authorized to accept this offer of dedication.
2. All required pictorial exhibits and/or legal descriptions necessary to complete the
abandonment process shall be provided by the project applicant to the satisfaction
of the Public Works Director. All exhibits and/or legal descriptions shall be
prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer who is authorized to
practice Land Surveying, in accordance with the California Business and
Professions Code Section 8700 et seq.
3. The abandonment results in additional property to be deeded back to adjacent
contiguous properties but does not constitute creation of a new parcel or lot.
SECTION 4. Recordation. The city clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution
to be recorded with the Office of the County Clerk-Recorder upon completion of the
above-stated conditions to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.
Upon motion of ______, seconded by Council Member _____, and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this __th day of MONTH 2025.
Page 719 of 764
Resolution No. ______ (2025 Series) Page 4
R _______
___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________.
___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
Page 720 of 764
Page 721 of 764
Page 722 of 764
ATTACHMENT B - VICINITY MAP
Area of proposed
abandonment
Parcel Map 07-0094
Site
Page 723 of 764
Page 724 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 725 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 726 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 727 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 728 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 729 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 730 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 731 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 732 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 733 of 764
Attachment 3
Page 734 of 764
Page 735 of 764
Page 736 of 764
Page 737 of 764
Page 738 of 764
Page 739 of 764
Page 740 of 764
Page 741 of 764
Page 742 of 764
Page 743 of 764
Page 744 of 764
Page 745 of 764
Page 746 of 764
Page 747 of 764
Page 748 of 764
Page 749 of 764
Page 750 of 764
Page 751 of 764
Page 752 of 764
Page 753 of 764
Page 754 of 764
Page 755 of 764
Page 756 of 764
Page 757 of 764
Page 758 of 764
Page 759 of 764
Page 760 of 764
Page 761 of 764
Page 762 of 764
Page 763 of 764
Page 764 of 764
Abandonment of 6-foot-wide Portion of
Church Street Right-of-Way
December 2, 2026
Gabriel Munoz-Morris, Supervising Civil Engineer
Recommendation
Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo, California, abandoning a 6-foot-wide portion of Church Street
public right-of-way adjacent to 1804 Osos Street” and authorize recordation once
conditions of abandonment have been met.
Background – Project Area
Osos Street
Church Street
Railroad
Avenue
Background – Project Area
Background - Parcel Map
1.Vesting Tentative Map –
Parcel Map SLO 07-0094
a)Approved April 21, 2009
2.Approval for surplus property
disposal
3.Right-of-Way abandonment
shown on parcel map
Right-of-Way Abandonment – Prior
Actions
California Streets and Highways Code Process
1.January 2009 – Planning Commission
a)General Plan consistency
2.April 2009 – City Council
a)Resolution of Intent to Abandon Right-of-Way
3.June 2009 – City Council
a)Resolution of Abandonment of Right-of-Way
i.Postponed
4.January 2015 – City Council
a)Resolution of Abandonment of Right-of-Way
i.Postponed
Background – Property Exchange
Agreement
1.Approved January 2015
by City Council
a)Environmental
Indemnity Agreement
2.Lender signature
3.Spring 2025 - New
Lender
Property Exchange Agreement Vs. Right-
of-Way Abandonment
1.Environmental Indemnity
Agreement
a)Requires prior
abandonment of Right-
of-Way on Church Street
b)Process not completed
2.Staff confirmed prior actions
remain valid
3.Re-notification of utility
companies
Next Steps
1.Complete Right-of-Way
abandonment and record
2.Surplus property is
transferred to applicant
3.Sign and record
Environmental Indemnity
Agreement and Real
Property Exchange
Agreement
Use of Abandoned Right-of-Way
1.Project approvals contemplated
abandoned Right-of-Way
2.Allows for expansion of building
footprint and expanded sidewalk
dining area
3.Prior approvals
a)Excess Right-of-way
b)De-emphasize use of dead-end
street
4.Applicant submittal of next phase of
development in 6 months
Recommendation
Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo, California, abandoning a 6-foot-wide portion of Church Street
public right-of-way adjacent to 1804 Osos Street” and authorize recordation once
conditions of abandonment have been met.
Questions?