Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Tank Testing
CC T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post. Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 INVOICE #CC001085 TEST DATE: 4/29/98 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Out responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** ***** SITE DATA ***** KAISER SAND & GRAVEL KAISER SAND & GRAVEL SUBURBAN SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: CONTACT: PHONE #: PHONE #: ******* T A N K D A T A ******** TANK #1 TANK #2 TANK #3 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 FUEL LEVEL (IN) 73 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 GROUNDWATER NO INFLUENCE ON TANK BOTTOMS ***** COMMENT LINES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING/ TANK #1: DIESEL 2 WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECTFULLY `P, ED & SUBMITTED, ROB�IBANKENSON CA90-1169 ANDREW L. PROFT RATE: 0.01230 G.P.H. LOSS 15 10 En W J J cl) —1C TAHX START TINE:15:18:39088 CURRENT TXME:16:18:48:88 'co: .00069 C1:7.88811 LEAD RATE: .81230 CPH LOSS -15 � C0001885. TST, i PTA, VERS I I'll 1.20 15 30 TIME (MINUTES) 45 Cr: 04/29/98 Ti CC T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 INVOICE #CC000977 TEST DATE: 7/7/97 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN RD. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. ******* T A N K TANK DIAMETER (IN) VOLUME (GAL) FUEL LEVEL (IN) FUEL TYPE dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) D A T A TANK #1 95 10000 73 DIESEL 2 113.07 ***** SITE DATA ***** SP MILLING 131 SUBURBAN RD. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. ******** TANK #2 TANK #3 GROUNDWATER NO INFLUENCE ON TANK BOTTOMS ***** COMMENT LINES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING/MONITORED 1HRS/TESTED 2 HOURS TANK #1: DIESEL 2 RATE: 0.01400 G.P.H. GAIN WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECT ULLY TESTED & SUBMITTED, ROBER P.,HANKENSON CA97-1169 ANDREW L. PROFT 15 10 cr3 W L> Z: 5 v-- C> C> J J W 0 --10 --15 ANX' J. START TIME: 00:50:40:00 'CO: .80009 C1: .00012 RATE: .01400 CPH GAIN CURRENT TIME:09:50:50:00 I'M VERSION 1.28 f 0 15 30 45 60 CCO@0977. TST, l TIME (MINUTES) 07/07/97 CC T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 INVOICE #CC000777 TEST DATE: 5/1/96 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING SURBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: PHONE #: ***** SITE DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING SURBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: PHONE #: ******* T A N K D A T A ******** TANK #1 TANK #2 TANK #3 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 FUEL LEVEL (IN) 62 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) 92.12 GROUNDWATER NO INFLUENCE ON TANK BOTTOMS ***** COMMENT LINES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING TANK #1: DIESEL 2 RATE: 0.01433 G.P.H. LOSS WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. ULLAGE PORTION TESTED TIGHT ALSO. RESPECTFULLY TESTED & SUBMITTED, ROBERT P. HANKENSON CA97-1169 ANDREW L. PROFT 15 Cr D Ln w z T- o Cl r J J W - -10 TAB I START TIME:18:49:48:88 CURRENT TIME:11:49:58:88 co: - . 80845 Ci:-.88816 RATE: .01433 CPH LOSS -15 0 CC000777.TST,1 PTA, VERSION 1.20 15 30 45 TIME (MINUTES) 85/81/96 IN CC T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 S05-966-9915 INVOICE #CC000599 TEST DATE: 07/11/95 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN ROAD P. 0. BOX 71 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: (805)543-8100 ***** SITE DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN ROAD P. 0. BOX 71 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: (805)543-8100 ******* T A N K D A T A ******** TANK NO.1 TANK NO.2 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 LENGTH (FT) 27.16 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 TYPE ST FUEL LEVEL (IN) 67 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) 122.21 GROUNDWATER BELOW TANK BOTTOMS ***** COWKENT LIMES ***** COMPLIANCE TESTING MONITORED 1HR/ TESTED 3 HRS. TANK NO.3 TANK N0.4 TANK #1: DIESEL 2 RATE: .015829 G.P.H. LOSS WET PORTION TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, BERT RrOP. HANKENSON CA97-1169 15 10 10 -15 -T 7 f TAN Y I START TIME:15:02:00:00 CURRENT TIME:16:02:00:00 4. vy-t 0 : -.00006 cl: -.00013 -LEAR RATE: .01503 GPH LOSS PTA, VERSION 1.20 Cr: SOL 3 0 15 30 45 CC808599.TST,2 TIME (MINUTES) 07/11/95 10 2 En w w a� w 5 r 0 LiJ F- w n w z —5 w 0 z U -10 Cr: 0 15 30 45 60 CCO00599.?S?,2 TIME (MINUTES) 07/11/95 INVOICE #CC000311 TEST DATE: 04/27/94 CCTT - CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTING P. O. BOX 2155 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93120 TANK STATUS EVALUATION REPORT ----------------------------- ***** CUSTOMER DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: COMPLIANCE TESTING ***** SITE DATA ***** SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING 131 SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA CONTACT: LOGAN, DAVE PHONE #: ***** COMMENT LINES ***** The UST 2000P/U Tank Testing System meets the current USEPA standards mandated in the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. The quanitative rate is an evaluation confidence tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. CCTT assumes no responsibility for product leak age. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date and levels tested. TANK #1: DIESEL FUEL 2 TYPE: STEEL TANNK TESTED TIGHT IN STATE COMPLIANCE. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, wAk? 000� ROBERT P. HANKENSON CA91-1169 RATE: .028220 G.P.H. LOSS ******* T A N K D A T A TANK NO. TANK NO. 1 2 TANK DIAMETER (IN) 95 LENGTH (FT) 27.16 VOLUME (GAL) 10000 TYPE ST FUEL LEVEL (IN) 72 FUEL TYPE DIESEL 2 dVOL/dy (GAL/IN) 114.82 CALIBRATION ROD DISTANCE 1 10.65625 2 26.95313 3 41.93750 4 56.93750 5 74.93750 TANK NO. TANK NO. 3 4 ******* C U S T O M E R D A T A******** JOB NUMBER : 000311 CUSTOMER (COMPANY NAME) : SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING CUSTOMER CONTACT(LAST, FIRST): LOGAN, DAVE ADDRESS - LINE 1 131 SUBURBAN ADDRESS - LINE 2 r CITY, STATE SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA ZIP CODE (XXXXX-XXXX) PHONE NUMBER (XXX)XXX-XXXX ******* C O M M E N T L I N E S******* COMPLIANCE TESTING ******* S I T E D A T A******** SITE NAME (COMPANY NAME) SITE CONTACT(LAST, FIRST) ADDRESS - LINE 1 ADDRESS - LINE 2 CITY, STATE ZIP CODE (XXXXX-XXXX) PHONE NUMBER (XXX)XXX-XXXX GROUND WATER LEVEL (FT) NUMBER OF TANKS LENGTH OF PRE -TEST (MIN) LENGTH OF TEST (MIN) : SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING : LOGAN, DAVE : 131 SUBURBAN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA : BELOW TANK BOTTOM : 30 : 180 15 1-1 1� V) w z 5 Q J Z w — —Co: z C1: 0 -10 EA START TIME:15:25:18:00 CURRENT TIME:16:25:10:00 .00018 -.88825 E RATE: -15 CC888311.TST,1 .02022 OPH LOSS PTA, VERSION 1.20 15 30 TIME (MINUTES) 45 Cr: 04/27/94 60 10 E Lo w w w 5 0 w cc D 0 w a_ w z —5 w c.D z c� —10 0 _,... START TIME:15:25:10:00 CURRENT TIME:16:25:10: PTA, VERSION 1.20 15 30 4.5 Cr: SOL 2 CCO00311.TST,1 TIME (MINUTES) 04/27/94 To C C T T Central Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 March 27, 1992 Mr. Jim Pettis S. P, Milling Company P. 0, Box 71 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Subject: UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE PRECISION TANK TEST [year Mr. Pettius 805-966-9915 The purpose of this report is to transmit the results from Central Coast Tank Testing's precision test of the underground storage tank at Summit Road, San Luis Obispo, California performed on Friday, March 27, 1992, BACKGROUND The system used to perform the test is the Horner "Ezy-Chek" Tank Testing System. This system meets or exceeds the NFPA V329-87 and USEPA-88 guidelines. These guidelines are the basis of all mandated requirements at the state, aunty or local agency levels. The system 1s capable of detecting a product volume variance rate of 0.05 gallons per hour with 95% confidence of 0.10 gallons per hour, The product volume variance rate 1s an equipment tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate, Central Coast Tank Testing assumes no responsibility for product leakage, Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date tested, according to state compliance guidelines, and within the accuracy tolerance of the Horner Testing System. Groundwater was not considered for the testing. The variables in testing; such as tank end deformation, entrapped vapor, evaporation, and temperature, are noted on the individual data sheets, if encountered. Testing and preparation comments are also noted. RESULTS Tank 1-10,000 gallon diesel system . This system was tested over a period of three hours and tested light in complienev. The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate. The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature produces a product volume variance rate of +0.020 gallons per hoar. A ditianally, the 950 cvnli*nse lntervols (-0. 014, +0. 054) prodacad were within the new USEPA testing criinris limits The fueling system was suction, Res ectfully submitted, T-}ko,��h 4En Robert P. Hankenson CENTRAL COAST TANK TEST' '). SANTA BARBARA, CA SITE AND TESTING INFORMATivN PAGE 1 OF 2 DATE 3/27/92 TEST CLIENT Southern Pacific Milling ADDRESS 141 Surhurhan CITY San Luis Obispo, CA TEST LEVEL ILLUSTRATION A TEST LEVEL ILLUSTRATION CONTACT PERSON Jim P./Steve Z. OPERATORS RPH CA91-1169 OTHER COMMENTS TANK* 1 Diesel A) Tank Bottom - Grade 153 B) Tank Top - Grade 58 C) Tank Diameter 95 D) Test. Level from grade 5 E) In Tank Water Depth c) F) Groundwater Influence 0 G) Test Level - Tank Bottom 158 HydrostaticPressure Top/Bottom 2,0/4.9 TANK# A) Tank Bottom - Grade B) Tank Top - Grade C) Tank Diameter D) Test Level above grade E) In Tank Water Depth F) Groundwater Influence G) Test. Level - Tank Bottom HydrostaticPressure Tap/Bottom CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTI ). SANTA BARBARA, CA SITE AND TESTING INFORMATevN Tank* Tank# 1 Actual Capacity Overflood Actual Capacity 10356 Overflood is Test Capacity Test Capacity 10371 Proauc Product Diesel Observed Temp Observed Temp ouserved Gravity Corrected Gravity Temp Coefficient Delivery Time Tipp Off Time TANK LAYOUT Load Area Observed Gravity Corrected Gravity Temp Coefficient 0,000455 Delivery Time Thurs prior Day Building M i e s _ �MMEMENMENI MONITORING & TESTIN6 COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS Additional site preparation. Normal set up procedure, Suction system, PAGE 2 OF 2 PREPARATION COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS AMBIENT TEMP BAROMETER ;TART END 1 ST HR END 2ND HR END 3TH HR END 4TH HR END 5TH HR END 6TH HR WEATHER CONDITIONS Overcast/Unstable between rains CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTI ' SANTA BARBARA. CA DATASHEET TANK} i 6PH CALCULAT WNS (INTERVAL X INT/HR) PRODUCT TIME INT OV s 1 TCVw 1 NV=1 0VGPH=1 TCVGPH=1 NVGPH= I MEANGPH STDDEV Diesel TEST VOLUME 1 -0,0084 -0,0142 0.0058 -0.202 -0,340 0.138 10371 2 -0,0014 -0,0047 0,0033 -0,034 -0.113 0,080 COEFFICIENT 3 0.0014 -0,0094 0.0108 0.034 -0.227 0,260 0,000455 4 -0,0056 -0,0142 0,0086 -0,134 -0,340 0.205 LEVEL 5 -0.0014 0,0142 -0,0156 -0,034 0,340 -0,373 0,0014 6 -0,0014 -0,0236 0,0222 -0,034 -0,566 0.533 TEMP 7 -0.0042 0.0094 -0,0136 -0,101 0,227 -0,327 4,719 8 -0.0028 0,0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0.000 -0,067 9 -0.0042 0.0000 -0,0042 -0,101 0,000 -0.101 10 -0,0028 0,0047 -0,0075 -0,067 0,113 -0.180 0,017 0,281 DATA ANALYSIS 1 1 -0.0014 0.0047 -0.0061 -0f)34 0,113 -0.147 -0,012 0.282 12 -0,0042 -0,0047 0,0005 -0,101 -0,113 0,012 -0,019 0,280 VOLUME CH6 13 -0,0056 -0.0047 -0,0009 -0,134 -0,113 -0,021 -0,047 0.262 -0.022 9ph 14 -0.0028 0k047 -010075 -0,067 0,113 -0.180 -0,085 0,249 TEMP VOL CH6 15 -0,0042 -0,0094 0,0052 -0,101 -0,227 0,126 -0,035 0.235 -0.042 9ph 16 -0,0014 -0,0094 0,0080 -0.034 -0.227 0,193 -0,069 0.154 VARIANCE RATE 17 -0,0028 0,0094 -0,0122 -0,067 0,227 -0.294 -0.066 0,148 +0.020 gph 18 -0.0028 -0,0236 0,0208 -0.067 -0,566 0,499 -0,009 0.232 95X CONFIDENCE 19 -0,0042 0,0047 -0,0089 -0.101 0.113 -0,214 -0.021 0.240 (-0.014.+0.054) 20 -0,0056 0,0094 -0,0150 -0.134 0.227 -0.361 -0.039 0,259 Tight in Compliance -0.0028 -0,0094 0,0066 -0,067 -0.227 0.159 -0,008 0.263 22 -0.0014 -0,0047 0,0033 -0.034 -0.113 0.080 -0,001 0.264 23 0,0000 0,0094 -0,0094 0.000 0,227 -0.227 -0,022 0.274 24 0,0000 -0.0142 0,0142 0.000 -0,340 0.340 0.030 0,289 25 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0,034 0,000 -0,034 0,014 0,288 26 -0,0056 -0.0047 -0,0009 -0,134 -0.113 -0.021 -0.007 0,281 27 -0,0042 -0,0094 0,0052 -0.101 -0.227 0,126 0,035 0.264 28 -0,0028 0.0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0.000 -0.067 -0,022 0.209 29 -0,0014 -0,0047 0,0033 -0,034 -011 13 0.080 0,007 0,199 30 -0.0014 -0,0094 0,0080 -0,034 -0.227 0,193 0,063 0,158 31 -0.0028 0,0047 -0,0075 -0.067 0.113 -0,180 0.029 0,171 32 -0,0028 -0.0047 0,0019 -0.067 -0,113 0,046 0.026 0.170 33 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0,048 0.146 34 0,0000 -0,0047 0,0047 0.000 -0,113 0.113 0,026 0,109 35 -0,0028 0,0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0.000 -0,067 0.022 0,1 1 1 36 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0.034 0.000 -0,034 0,021 0,112 37 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0.113 0.080 0,016 0,108 38 -0,0028 0,0000 -0,0028 -0,067 0,000 -0.067 0.016 0,108 39 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0.113 0,080 0,016 0,108 40 -0.0014 0,0000 -0.0014 -0,034 0,000 -0.034 -0,006 0,089 41 -0.0014 0.0047 -0,0061 -0.034 0.113 -0.147 -0.003 0,082 42 -0,0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0,034 0,000 -0.034 -0,011 0,080 43 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0.034 0.000 -0,034 -0,014 0.081 44 -0,0014 0.0000 -0.0014 -0.034 0,000 -0,034 -0,029 0,067 45 0.0000 0,0047 -0.0047 0.000 0.113 -0.113 -0,034 0,071 46 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.0033 -0,034 -0,113 0.080 -0,022 0.080 47 -0.0014 0,0000 -0,0014 -0.034 0.000 -0.034 -0,034 0,071 CtTT 46 0.00' 0.0047 -0.0047 DATASHEET 49 0.00(jv 0.0000 0.0000 TANK* 1 50 0,0000 -0.0047 0,0047 CONTINUED 51 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 PAGE 2 52 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 53 -0,0014 -0,0047 0,0033 54 0,0000 -0.0047 0.0047 55 0,0000 -0.0047 0.0047 56 -0.0014 -0,0047 0.0033 57 -0,0014 -0.0047 0.0033 56 -0.0014 -0.0047 0,0033 59 0.0000 -0,0047 0.0047 60 -0,0014 -0,0047 0.003.; DAI-A ANALYSIS VOLUME CH6 -0.022 qph TEMP VOL CH6 -0.042 gph VARIANCE RATE +0.020 gph 95X CONFIDENCE (-0.014,+0.054) Tight in Compliance 0.000 1113 -0.113 -0,038 0.075 0,000 V.000 0.000 -0.046 0.065 0.000 -0113 0.113 -0.031 0,082 0,000 0.000 0,000 -0,017 0.072 0,000 0.000 0.000 -0.013 0.072 -0,034 -0,113 0,080 -0.002 0.077 0.000 -0.113 0,113 0,013 0.084 0,000 -0,113 0,113 0,035 0,077 -0,034 -011 13 0,060 0,035 0,077 -0.034 -0,113 0.080 0,047 0,074 -0,034 -0,113 ' 0.080 0,066 0,048 0,000 -0.113 0.113 0.077 0,044 -0.034 -0,113 0.080 0.074 0.042 -0.022 -0.042 0.020 StdDev CENTRAL COAST TANK TESTI STATISTICAL REVIEW TANK ;1 X 1: QV6PH* 1 Mean: Std. Dev.: Std. Error: Variance: Coef. Var,: Count: -1023 .019 .004 3,647E-4 -84.405 124 Minimum: Maximum: Ilan e: Sum: Sum Squared: * Missing: 1-1067 0 1 -543 .021 0 t 959: 959 Lower: 959 Upper: t 999: 993 Lower: 99A upper:, 1.006 -1031 -,015 .011 -1034 -1012 * < 1Oth R: 1Oth Fe: 25th 2: 50th 9: 75th R: 90th 90: 1 -,034 -,034 -.034 0 0 * 90th 8, Mode: Geo. Mean: Har. Mean: Kurtosis: Skewness: 0 -,034 19 le -.793 -,024 X2: TCV6PHs 1 Mean: Std, Dev,: Std, Error: Variance: Coef, Var.: Count: -.042 .08 .016 .006 -189,584 124 Mlnimum: Maximum: Range: Sum: Sum Squared: * Missing: -,1 13 ,1 13 .226 1 -1,017 .192 0 t 959: 95% Lower: 959 Upper: t 999: 999 Lower: 999 Upper: 034 1.F088 -.076 -.008 ,046 ,004 * < 1Oth 93: 1Oth 9: 25th 9: 50th R: 75th R: 90th 9: Q -.1 13 1-1113 1-057 Q 1.113 * > 90th J%: Mode: Geo. Mean: Har. Mean: Kurtosis: Skewness: 0 -.113 • • -1739 1.66 XA_ NV6PH#1 Mean: Std. Dev.: Std, Error: ariance: Coef. Var.: Count: 02 .081 .016 .007 402,127 24 Minimum; Maxirnurn, Ran e: Sum: Surn Squared: * Missing: -,147 1.113 .25 .482 ,16 o 999: 999Lower: 999 Upper: Lower: er; 1.034 -1014 .054 .046 -1026 .066 * < IOth R: 1Qth ia; 25th R: 50th 9: 75th R: 90th 9: 1 -.113 -.034 ,04 .08 .113 * > 90th 9: Mode: Geo. Mean: Har. Mean: Kurtosis: Skewness: tj 1 ,0ei 19 1 • -,964 1 -,5 CIENTRAL COAST TANK TESTY 1 SANTA BARBARA. CA PA )1 DATA L06/READING' TANK* 1 TANK #1 TIME INT LEVEL TEMP COMMENTS PRODUCT 55 1,015 Diesel 15 1 49 1,012 2 48 1,011 Truck in area 20 3 49 1,009 4 45 1,006 Truck out of area 25 5 44 1,009 6 43 1,004 Truck near area 30 7 40 1,006 a 100/96 1,006 35 9 95 1,006 10 93 1,007 40 11 92 1,008 12 89 1,007 45 13 85 1,006 14 83 1,007 50 15 80 11005 16 79 1,003 55 17 77 1,005 18 75 1,000 0 19 72 1,001 Truck: near area 20 68 1,003 5 21 66 1,001 22 65 1,000 10 23 65 1,002 24 65 0,999 15 25 64 0,999 26 60 0,998 20 27 57 0,996 28 55 0,996 25 29 54 0,995 30 53 0,993 30 31 51 0,994 32 49 0,993 35 33 49 0,993 34 49 0,992 40 35 47 0,992 36 46 0,992 45 37 45 0,991 30 43 0.991 50 39 42 0,990 40 41 0,990 55 41 40 0,991 42 39 0,991 0 43 38 0,991 44 37 0,991 5 45 37 0,992 46 36 0,991 10 47 35 0,991 CCTT 48 35')0,992 DATA L06. 15 49 35 0.992 CONTINUED 50 35 0.991 PAGE 2 20 51 35 0,991 52 35 0.991 25 53 34 0,990 54 72/72 0.989 30 55 72 0,988 56 71 0,987 35 57 70 0,986 58 69 0,985 40 59 69 0.984 60 68 0,983 45 61 62 63 64 65 MAY 31 '21 09:58 COPY°CAT- , P.2/10 1 T Central Coast Tank Tasting Post Office Box 2155. Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 May 10, 1991 Mr, Jim Pettus Southern Pacific Milling Co, P,0.Box 71 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Subject: UNDERGROUND FUEL_ STORAGE PRECISION TANK TESTS SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LOCATIONS Dear Sir:. The purpose of this report is to transmit the results from Central Coast Tank Tasting's precision tests of the underground storage tanks at your facilities located In Santa Margarita and ,San Luis Obispo, California concluded on Friday, May 10. 1991. BACKGROUND The system used to perform the test 1s the Horner "Ezy-Ch8V Tank Testing System, This w*stern meets or exceeds the NFPA &329-67 and USEPA-88 guidelines, These guidelines are the basis of all mandated requirements at the state, county or local agency levels, The system is capable of detecting a product volume variance rate of 0.05 gallons per hour with 95% confidence of 0.10 gallons per hour. The product volume variance rote is an equipment tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate, Central Coast Tank Testing assumes no responsibility for product leakage, Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date tested, according to state compliance guidelines, and within the accuracy tolerance of the Horner Testing System, Groundwater was not considered for the testing, The variables in testing; such as tank end deformation, entrapped vapor, evaporation, and temperature, are noted on the individual data sheets, If ancountered, Testing and preparation comments are also noted; RESULTS Santa Margarita Location Tank 1-10,000 gallon diesel system. This system test was performed over a period of two hours and tested tlo/it la comollance The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate, The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature, produces an improving product volume variance rate of hnur. AoWitinnelly the 95.E wn(irf9nce intervals l — 0.062, f 0 009) oroedutw d were witnla the 11560A criteria limits MAY 31 '91 09:59 COPY°CAT P.3/10 TIM 2-20,000 gallrit) MIMI Wstem, TrIIS Syetarn test was perrormed ovor a period or two hours and tested tight /a cmplla= The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate. The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature, prflduces an improving product volume variance rate of AdOtlanally, tht 959 awfftmr Intervals t - 0. 0,74. + D. 0.0V of-eAwwW rr+B # wtthla the USERA criterla 1IarltS San Luis Obispo Looation Tank 1-10,000 gallon diesel system. This system test was performed over a period of two r►ours and tasted trot /# pl/#&V. The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was , 3quate. The volume change, corrected for the influence of ternperalure, produces an improving product volume variance rate of -0. 0Jp,4vIlnns par howl,. AaWlvnally, Iht 95.f vv#A i9nce Mtorivols ( -A. 064, --0 DIJ) pra*vad wars wlthll? tho MAN criteria Ilinlls: RespGo�}tfully submitted, Robert p, HankGnsoo Central Coast Tank Testing 2 CCTTCentral Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155. Santa Barbara. CA 93120 May 26, 1990 Mr. Scott Kenyon Southern Pacific Milling Co. 3555 Vineyard Avenue Oxnard, CA 93030 Subject: UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE PRECISION TANK TESTS Dear Sir: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY LOCATIONS ,JJJIV �yQ 1-�711irof;�J� , 19,90 605-�l8161LQ(9�1l�S The purpose of this report is to transmit the results from Central Coast Tank Testing's precision tests of the underground storage tanks at your facilities located in Santa Margarita and San Luis Obispo, California concluded on Saturday, May 26, 1990. BACKGROUND The system used to perform the test is the Horner "Ezy-Chek" Tank Testing System. This system meets or exceeds the Nf"PA 0329-87 guidelines. These guidelines are the basis of all mandated requirements at the state, county or local agency levels. The system is capable of detecting a product volume variance rate of 0.05 gallons per hour. The product volume variance rate is an equipment tolerance, rather than a permissible leak rate. Central Coast Tank Testing assumes no responsibility for product leakage. Our responsibility extends only to testing of tanks as tight or not tight, as of the date tested, according to state compliance guidelines, and within the accuracy tolerance of the Horner Testing System. Testing methodology is also included that meets the statistical review of the data collected. Groundwater was not considered for the testing. The variables in testing; such as tank end deformation, entrapped vapor, evaporation, and temperature, are noted on the individual data sheets, if encountered. Testing and preparation comments are also noted. Santa Margarita Location RESULTS Tank I - 10,000 gallon diesel system. This system test was performed over a period of two hours and tested 49111 in evmplionc: The hydrostatic pressure applied to the system was adequate. The volume change, corrected for the influence of temperature, produces an improving product volume variance rate of -O..Oy to -0.013 gvllans per hour. ,ladilionally, the 95,E c�vnliaf�nce intervals araducwd were within the neM criteria limits 1 SZF a t� KA/SE/4 ;�Ahr 5ANO & GRAVEL COMPANY A Subsidiary of Koppers Company, Inc POST OFFICE BOX 580, PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 415/846-6800 April 27, 1989 Heather Paris County of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Health P. 0. Box 1489 San Luis Obispo, Ca 93406 Dear Heather: Enclosed for your review are the results of our underground tank tests for our Santa Margarita Plant (Facility #000152/1) and our San Luis Obispo Plant (Facility #000152/3). As we discussed on the telephone, I did not test the tank at the Atascadero Plant (Facility #000152/2) since we are removing the tank within the next two weeks. Very truly yours, KAISER SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY Lawrence W. Appleton Manager of Engineering LWA:mb Enclosure CCTTCentral Coast Tank Testing Post Office Box 2155, Santa Barbara, CA 93120 805-966-9915 April 24. 19,g9 ;r Larry Appieton. aiser .5ana &Gravel r Box 580 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Sub3ect: UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE PRECISION TANK TESTS Dear MI r AoWeton -ne purpOSe of • this report is � t0 transm; T`Ir results from Central - 4in 's �oa�t "art �: , e-�• , � � ., preclsi0r: test o} }!le dC: v at your company locations in Sar:'a ar iar eta and :;an Luis Ohic.Do perfnrm a.d on Wennesoay and 5at!.lyday, April 19 & 22. 1989 BACKGROUND Tne system used to pert :l ;1 r, _ IF Hor :lei �/-I` r: T C Cy^} -� ,- "E� 'a, .e_tin , cM siem rneetc or e.X eeOQ the NFr'A �`G-'•, nl_!,r-alined Tjir- :111111oiinrg are the 11_~5iS Of all roandated requirements at the state, cour:ty nr ;OG l agency - iir SyC%-- l i= 3pdD;e of l�etcc+ �g a prc 4 �1N., ,--5,: 1 nT r'I .�C 1 "- • :lr duC, Y!�. mp �;'.j� :'7..�e ."'7�.e _ ., i � ,� r�F,r ti` - ,e ''. �'duC±. rate i_ an eQl_lipm�nt tnlPr7nCP raider ',Nm a oerml=,;le IP +! - c r, } lb aK yir i_:r,., �i l.OaSt rlk i e.,tinq ~'�IJ lile� rll� rejF^r'n �': tiili�'V IUr rr Or'11 r;t �'�r a(je.. ✓'.fit" r^PCpOn•.'. ��:1''y 'l,y +i.,� '.0 �''•r'l� U `-?nkc as t,nht ,1r r)nt +;yht -s of the date iecter arcordlnq to - to i j l+ 1 �a.r e. ^P_c any Yvltn;n the accuracy tolerance of ripe Horner-e,tlnq ''',�5tenl Testlna metr,ouoil- ✓ iD also .n-, u. l `., _♦ ,a_ fir, 4'_ ♦._ _� - .. ;r'1�,rdWd'r.r •Nam nUi considered IUr trle testing Tne :'ar'aDll ;r, to-'?:nq ;I;cri y. '.arlk' end 1�:v�•rrla±loin Nr.+ryc,Defi >apor, evaporati-or, 3r ' t:ri-:nerat:,!re jr-o _'. r tr :L".' ' ata enoneed-eztinq and preDdratinn ._Inlr! en+ are RESULTS Tank 1 ._ ., .__=. ,_ -,r=rlod li tW:=hour_ .end tested light. nrPccljirP .9lied tc, !`1e _ -ctorn l7ijr1nrt .rie +P,_±„1 ��d�• a0@QUv'e 'nr VJII_Irnc cnange, corrected iUr 'Ilee r li II ae'rr a 9 Ih_ c rirrierat,_;rp. rlroal_!cec a e ' " ' •; ' e - 0. 02 to - 0. 04 ga/Ions per hour. 4ddil ion8lly, b statistics/ quality review of the date collected, indicated a positive correlatioi between volume change and the lemperdture trend. The 95$ confidence interva, Produced was within the new EPA /imils. The line test was observed with the .syslem test. The producl line was eXpo.Se<. and could he visually inspected. Tank 2 - ''0,000 X?uri d+e'e? :✓ste r,� fa nerioul of two hpUrs and te,-zte'd tight. The nvdrn;t8?ic• prrs .ure 9(Dliec ._, .ne ;T ;I;r - � r„_, t h e resting was adequate Temperature pf-uue pIal erien,. vva-� lrle—jr- .7r Cr^l.Pdu.rP ThP. n(jtt)M twalVo lfl('iluc War �':trrrYej• W'?r' Stf'atif nATion. tnc- tMrnror'a111rr, r:•aitirfnc. Wart .1ff , •r,re,'t _.., 7..� ,..... "If'r r f 'i 1 ifl ` f ` ot'u '3 4 (J l] :Gt►?� r� 2 f U►?t1! �. @mQ 3is �r cP�e �1r:���_._* v;;;;nth �r i'�:e �L,f ; gallons per hour. Additionally, a statistical quality review of the dwz collected, indicated a positive correlation between volume change and the temperature trend. The 95.5 confidence interval produced was within the new f PA /im its. All lines could be visually observed and were tight. The product line was shut off at the gale valve located on top of the tank. The line run is above 9rounc from this valve. Tank 3 - 10,000 ga.?c!rl U1esr',i .steer 'Dar _uis uGispoi. Thi; y_,tem was tested o,er a Deriod r� tW,- rfd te`,light ht Th1 t= '] r p.' :�+ +.� {, + . J ,✓..__ F( __��.U~., Jf 'd - W'8� IUCUIiOIr TemDeratlirr ar10=.G58rVeG v;lil_r(pF were 'lren(jlrq tOQethe(' the lughcUl t.rlE 'A`.t:ng :Mh' '::�n!�P_,, :I_,( `�.•.Fu Tii( trl ri��'_iG!}I_,� IIT tr i.'~rJ.0 C :�rill]!I(�eC-rod!_ilt ,'nllrrno r �.,,.`•C ]Te i l t 0.04 gallons per hour. Additionally, a statistical quality review of the data collected, indicated a positive correlation between volume change and 111E temperature trend The 959 confidence interval pr:'?duced was within the neM EPA limits The fine test was observed with the system test. Th.,: product line was exposes and could be visually inspected. The vent line was exposed also and the fil, riser had been replaced. •-,tom. .- _� � a. —_ •r -. WEBTERN T TANK TECHNOLOGY STORAGE SYSTEM SERVICES Larry A ppaUan `- P-O- Bnz 5.80 Pleasonton CA 94566 W.T.T. Precision Tank Testing (�to y ,l�7 Re: ' Tank System Test, March 4, 5 and 6, 1989 At Santa Margarita and San Luis Obispo locations R F P'•#• •r, ��, M ^,R 2 41989 Dear Mr. Appelton: �rlISe-(2 �f to j --k (�,0Au'rc. � The tank systems tested at this location are identified as follows: T:.'°; item a 1 a2 a3 10,000 gal. Diesel 20,000 gal. Diesel 10.000 gal. Diesel The National Fire Protection Association's criteria for a tight tank system is a system with a rate of leak less than + .050 gal/hr. for tank systems 12,500 gallons or less. These are calculated, mathematical tolerance only and are not meant to indicate the permission of any leak. During the stand -pipe test procedure the liquid hydrostatic pressure _ applied to the underground tank system is generally two to three times greater than normal liquid storage pressures. The increase in hydrostatic pressure will amplify the indicated rate of leak accordingly. Prior to -and after testing the tank bottoms were checked for water through the fill pipes, no measurable amounts were recorded. 1) Santa Margarita location. Tank system 1 showed a rate of leak at -.210 gph. Tank system 81 Failed. Tank -system 2 showed a rate of leak at -1.064 gph. Tank system 82 failed. 2) San Luis Obispo Location Tank system 3 showed a rate of leak at -.198 gph. Tank system a3 failed. From v! a office of Jeff Pickard, 3100 Ramona, Atescadero, CA 93422 (805) 461-3253 9 � L N . 2 - H o 0 o N n a 0 � 3 m 3 m x o � m x n 7 r' ❑ � a ❑ rn H " o 2 (p) .0 O O IV n m m N w m o< o 3 TI o _ N 0!L O < _ o a m o. D 0 -n n �o m c s:C a m m 3 3 3 _a jTj m n o �- ssp Q G ° o L7 n Z T o tj o Z o 0 m c A m u m o m m n i v 0 -n 0 m X m U. L ° o _ O m N e Z n n � m e � T *-vo c) ° 1 A, c1i .o O p• O T O c a W 3 m o m 3 cn � T n� m » c 3 8 C) 0 o m D a 0m 0 o r n E » m v Z F m m Z " n O m n ° o m 0 v v C o m C cn m � O n° cn N V cn •--I N- m xm :m N o GO nn c0 Z oo, 3 7C o' ° a X T c m 0 cn D 1 ZEl m .x. o a ° 0 �n o m' � F i� ❑ m n N m a o F � m n e ° Z = m Q a m O m n v CDI ` W 7Cp m F m T v m z m v Cn a 0 R I ° Elm c m Z C 0 ° m Cl) F ° m 0 Z -n m _ G7 O o m o' n n � S 1 1 � VV .. T W O 3 i N mAm c 3y m" la O n m m O1.m 3 m ,a 3T Q c< _ < -3 O m g • 71 m m oF�c vp2 _ O 0 = m .El Cim Cl) 3 0 �7 _ so Elg Z <° � Z a x $ O C7 D m m G� y v 3 � -3 m �o r � OD _a ❑ _ o S v N 1 M co m 11 o m v O X a OD m m Z _ N �# i s Q r a s3 b rs N � �+ j r •n T i C m cn cn m K m� El e m —4 a T rm > Z 00 3 T O N n 9 3 I-- h i m v m o - I � m o ` - m � m' • °o m m n - �o I n } CA n CJ n Z O ° � n U O T D Z a T m .. r T v V. O 0 j co NJ -71 -e- "Ell FA "J Li CA 'D Ll IZ& IL gz +1 Vi Vk 'I 'k CIO N� < -.41, -.C- --rl 4z -< < Nrl 14� P AL k-j Q) 17 C, co IZ, Ci 0 "1 up %A Tg gp� Q JAR "I 3E ftLLL 00 -AL , . - , I "li I- R z r-j - 7 I 'r� 10 b Y n y O or CC7 C9 n H G rIO O � m � c F.� 1 � i a ko —TT-1w N N fv N N N _= y r4� _,9 = N O •a�H w N N N N d_ r k W o N 3 9 a s .a (� Dy Q`y � y Q \? �i � � V ii �, �'�l' � i •j .�� O 5 W t=-n � t`c�' � N aQD 2 d � 3 - o UNDERGROUND TANK TESTS S, INC. TANK CERTIFICF, r ION & Horner 917 W. Belleview LOCATION DATA CHART EZY CHE� Porterville, Ca 93257 leak detector Phone (209) 781-6508 NOTICE: It is the owner's responsibility to contact the environmental health department of any failures within 24 Hours of the results given to the owner. OWNER'S Property NAME /L A VG L S" �. ty Telephone Tank(s) Imo' V L Address City Zip County 1 NAME OF LOCATION l e r a c , I Name Address Telephone -- — - REASON FOR TEST (Explain Fully) WHO REQUESTED TEST AND WHEN Name P D _ _ _ Tine_ _ _ _ _ O ( f ,4 loy„� _ _ _ ( flat.- _ — 0 Address I elepnone WHO IS PAYING KA t k f CT R� It,L y �a u y,Indrwdual Telephone FOR THIS TEST? (� Billing Address City Stale Zip ITEM OR SYSTEM TESTED Identify by Direction of owner to# Capacity Brand/Supplier Grade Approx Age Steel / Fiberglass C) V l t e( 11 Aj i TANK ONLY ❑ ❑ PRODUCT LINE VENT LINE ❑ p VAPOR LINE C ALL OF THE ABOVE ❑ ❑ o INSTALLATION Location Sla4rh u �- Cover Concrete ❑ Fills 4" ❑ F �� Vents If Manilolded Yes ❑ Srphones Yes ❑ Pumps �% Suction K Hand ❑ DATA Skv� Dt ,. G! North inside driveway, Rear of station, etc. Blacktop J❑' Earth I(1� Other 2" ❑ 1Y2" ❑ Other Size Remote Fills ❑ Size No � No GL� Which tanks? e ❑ HYDROSTATIC TEST ON LINE ❑ Yes GLMrf Recover 1 ❑ Stage 2 ❑ LN UNDERGROUND WATER Depth to the Water table s the water over the tank? ❑Yes OPI7Sr Tanks to be filled (. U V hr r2 _ o Date Distributor —1. Q - r Qe Il A rZ FILL -UP ARRANGEMENTS Extra product to "top off' YES NO Name RJS_IS T3— 0/ 90 Telephone CONTRACTOR, any other MECHANICS, contractor involved OTHER INFORMATION OR REMARKS Additional information on any items above Officials or others to be advised when testing is in progress or completed Visitors or observers present during test etc Tests were made on the above tank systems in accordance with Horner EZY Check Leak Detection test TEST RESULT procedures prescribed Tank Identification a for as detailed on attached lest charts with results as follows: Lines Only Tight Leakeage Indicated Date Tested TANKS f Yes,& No ❑ -n. PRODUCT LINES Lam' Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ueM & Vent Yes f3� Yes ❑ No ❑ Lines Included No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ CERTIFICATION �-10-r? Dare SEQUOIA PRINTING - VISALIA 734 3176 This is to certify that these tank systems were tested on the date(s) shown. Those indicated as "Tight" meet the criteria established by the (National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 329.) CALIFORNIA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGULATIONS ARTICLE 4 SECTION 2643 ( ) DENNIS E GOODAN Technician UNDERGROUND TANK TESTERS, INC./By: Signature WHITE — FILE CANARY — County PINK — Horner G.R. — Customer v 0 T to N r O z 0 ZI�Iw O CIl Q o m J Q U �- cr ❑ CI 2 N 0 U o z `z 1 C7 W I LJ m 0 f� V Z N W J O W U ZY -Wi -Wi _I �m>(C:" F =w z CC Z tea0 = a O cc C) w W G Z CC LU ON 14 W W Y O J C W W u d LU Q U U C ❑ I I a d I I ¢ u � a woo Q XCC u U W �w= U M a 0 z w ll o �p w \ cr a JY 0 Z Q U D a C~ O� U N z _ D C F- > J Q U a Z O ❑ N w Q > w O U) w ❑ Y � r z � (`( d W a Q Q F- > U) qL z w U_ LL LL W O Oz U U L o a ) o U C LLI Q m a W C0 } W U Z a 1- H w Fn O cc: U W a H ❑ r O a. a J W W J W Z _ H F } m Z W LU w a o z W pC cn z cr w w U O J d LL. Z F- Q H= Z w 1 zW � �w I � I ' II I II • II I 1 It I It ' 111 11 I ' 111 II I 11 ,I 4 tf (Y t co wW �W rc _ a f, a Ccl �I I 11 I 11 1 11 r 11 1 11 1 11 I II 1 11 II -- — - - V - - f x x I x x x x x x x x x x + zU) Q <° 1 I II r � � I �' I I CL W W II (` (� 11 II 11 II 11 II II II 1�1 I I I I I I I I I I w F- \. 1 W W U W w J � �. II ' 11 1 II ( II II I II I It 1' II 1 II I II v �r x x 1 x x x x x x x x x x + z� V �� �� 1� II II 11 II II II W z 3 Z ww J II 1. 11 II w F W C W H I QU I 1 I I I I I I I - El U7 Y cQ G w cr UNDERGROUND TANK TESTERS, INC. I9BelWew �In w Portervitle, CA 93257 0 F F 1 C F I Vil A�SOJ� ICE, -CAI L ILL � GE.rnEIIT' BA-t f4 PLA14T rBGOG. YAt5CR --SA00 4 GRAVEL CD< 131 s1t6rbopj UNDERGROUND TANK. TESTE. —s, INC. Horner 917 W. Belleview TANK CERTIFICA�, ION & �Y .��- Porterville, Ca 93257 LOCATION DATA CHART Lek detector Phone (209) 781-6508 NOTICE: It is the owner's responsibility to contact the environmental health department of any failures within 24 Hours of the results given to the owner. OWNER'S Property PrA I It t 'CILAUtl NAME C o . am Telephone Tank(s) (� X t SAS NAME OF LOCATION 0 i N it rt716- Name Address Tale REASON FOR TEST (Explain Fully) WHO REQUESTED TEST AND WHEN ^ z No Title p u [t T DoIC / - OC Address telephone e-1 8 - 88U 0 WHO IS PAYING FOR THIS TEST? any, Agen or Individual o s l� [ to N �9 , L Telephone Billing Address Crly We Zip ITEM OR SYSTEM TESTED Identify by Direction of owner IDII Capacity Brand/Supplier Grade Approx. Age Steel Fiberglass TANK ONLY L_ DD v UNA'No C U AJ 4'111,110W Al UIII ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ PRODUCT LINE 111.-1 VENT LINE ❑ ❑ VAPOR LINE ❑ ❑ ❑ ALL OF THE ABOVE ❑ ❑ ❑ INSTALLATION Location / (.INd, ►K 0, L Cover / Concrete Fills 4" ❑ 3" Vents Mandolded Yes ❑ Siphones Yes G Pumps Suction P"Hand ❑ DATA �Ld North inside driveway, Rear of station, etc Blacktop ❑ ' Earth Q/ Other 2° ❑ 1YZ„ ID Other Size Remote Fills ❑ .210 Size No ULf / No lj�— Which tanks? Turbine ❑ HYDROSTATIC TEST ON LINE ❑ Yes LIIIII Vapor Recovery None LW,, — Stage 1 ❑ Stage 2 ❑ UNDERGROUND WATER Depth to the Water table —V �rN 0" N s the water over the tank? ❑Yes R�� FILL -UP ARRANGEMENTS Tanks to be filled . 7 UO hr 12 1 J ' 6 O Date Distributor Extra product to "top off' (0 NO , Name 7 Telephone CONTRACTOR, any other MECHANICS, cur lractor Involved t n! M,4,4 WA CoLet R i[Altc.l c cJe 1 r OTHER INFORMATION OR REMARKS Additional information on any items above. Officials or others to be advised when testing is in progress or completed. Visitors or observers present during test etc. Tests were made on the above tank systems in accordance with Horner EZY Check Leak Defection lest TEST RESULTS procedures prescribed for as detailed on attached test charts with results as follows: Tank Tank Identification # Lines Only Tight Leakeage Indicated Date Tested I Yes JI4 No ❑ TANKS L — / PRODUCT LINES 4d/ Yes ❑ No ❑ Veoer & Vent Yes &,-*I Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Lines Included No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ CERTIFICATION This is to certify that these tank systems were tested on the date(s) shown Those indicated as "Tight" meet the criteria established by the (National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet 329) CALIFORNIA UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGULATIONS / 0, ARTICLE 4 SECTION 2643 ( ) DENNIS E GOODAN(0-0 , Dale Technician UNDERGROUND TA ESTERS. INC./By: Signature SEQUOIA PRINTING-VISALIA )]e 3176 WHITE — FILE CANARY — County PINK — Horner G.R. — Customer f�s D cn 4� cn cn (D En ■ D n m " m mi (� %Z C/) 0 c o z m 0 m Z :0 70 z < { 0 z cn r Tt c m n m o Z - � m m N O c � n a c � n 0 0 m Ti T m z U)< O O D m 7o z � z p m n m G7 O D m G) m N❑ Z O Z m m D � C r Z W Z N �m m O D D Z Z , 37 0 Oxr z -n Z G7 x m 0. m o_� oz� cn m m 0D T 0 0 �Z m z v = m _< D m X MD n p 0 G) _ m 1) n ❑ 2 :X) D Z C� m o Z < U) T C z ZO m X W D T n D r p m r- O :� 0 00 -1 0 m m - m m cQ 0 m I , C/) z o � T D CD W-0 ET c� a n eo i. C °o"Z O �l M m1,0 mz0 T N m< co � r = m r Z m m n m X O r't 00 m N m o n yl W z z z O O CP El Ci D c� D r W � � Z N UNDERGROUND TANK TESTERS, INC. 917 lid Belleview Portendll% CA 93257 OFFic— SA lJTA Yri I.iZGAR i TA ) %w , 24 Hr. Phone R.W. WILLIAMS, INC. 239 E Newlove 928-7311 Certified Tank Testing Santa Maria, CA Kaiser Sand & Gravel P.O. Box 580 Pleasanton Ca.if. 94566 Attn: Lena Tam N 0 V 2 7 . . KSIG- CNr. On October 10, 1985 the #2 Diesel fuel tank located at the San Luis Obispo batch plant was tested. Results of testing indicate that the above mentioned tank is tight accumulated change over a period of one hour was less than .05 gal. per hour. Variable factors such as tempature changes of the product in the tank,tempature stratification of the product in the tank, tank end deflection and the presents of any ground water around the tank, was taken into consideration and either compensated for or eliminated. This certification is not to be considered a garentee of continued tight worthyness but rather an indication of current condition. Richard W. Williams President R .W .WILLIAMS , INC. /t A A /D S 195 10 15. TANK TO; TEST {/ Ot laanutr or/pornr do 17. FILL -UP FOR TEST 18. CAPACICY Nominal Capacity Gallons Is there doubt as to True Capacity? See Section "DETERMINING TANK CAPACITY" Stick Water Bottom �s before Fill -up 0, /1 —_ to % In. Gallons flulll ^ Station Chan By _J capacity chart ves nn hart eTank Manulactur'a Chair G.uon. Company P ny Engineering Dal■ Charts supplied with FK`trO TIfP Other _ FIN up. STICK BEFORE AND AFTER EACH COMPARTMENT DROP OR EACH METERED DELIVERY QUANTITY Stick Readings Total Gallons 1014 in 7 Gallons on.. Reading Inventory - 9 Tank Diameter F/ ProdoeE In fug taMt (up to INN pipe) 1_.— 18. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO TEST TNIS TANK /-2-qoD VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM Sw manual wtwna appl,ubla. Chuck bolo« and reco,d moC4dWo-kol",(2$)• Ste" I Worker In tank High water table In tank excavation ❑ Line(a) Wing tested with L J � Stags 11 18 TANK MEASUREMENTS FOR 21. TEMPERATURE/VOLUME FACTOR (a) TO TEST THIS TANK TSTT ASSEMBLY / Bottom of tank to Grade* .. .. Add 30" for 4" L ...... ..... " Add 2e" for 3' L or air seal 2 Total tubing to assemble Approximate 20. EXTENSION HOSE SETTING Tank top to grad ..... Extend hose on auction tube 6" or more below lank top .. ....... •• 'It Fill pipe extends above grade, use top of fill. Is Today Warmer? I i Colder? I I —° F Product in Tank _° F Fill -up Product on Truck _° F Expected Change ( + or - ) 22. Thermal -Sensor reading otter eirculallon /aa7 __ 774 7 °F 23. '� digitsNaa,etr Digit. per IF In range of expected change 24. _P/611_ digit. 7 S/3 3z 1610 quantity in x ,000CIVS!/ coattlafenl of expanalon for - gallons volume change In this tank full tank (16 oorrr1177) Involved product per 'F 25. �( ✓l—Q z/ , b /41 1 volume change par °F (2e) --- Digits pan *F In test = This is Volume change per c lglt. test Range (23) Compute to a decimal places. factor (a) L00 OF TEST PROCEDURES 30. HyoROSTATIC PRESSURE CONTROL 31. VKM IKASUREKM M RECORD TO MI OLL 34 „36.NETVOLUME TENP(ROURE CONPE wiu CHANGES USE FACTOR W EACH READING 39. ACCUMULATED FO 29. Record details of Setting up and running Ieel. jute lull length of line it naed.d.) 29. heft Standoffs Level in lackea Rra,.uap level a~ of wAid Rabq Rotund 32. P graduate adaw Product Ra had f (-1 Prdan Raer.nd(+) 3). The San.n Rectal 36. 37, Chan Y es c T ma,. Hiyh" + (c) I•N ' Low" + 6.anuw Ic) cau"O" - TeaPsatWa AAlanteut M ere Owl towns TdW Ead aeas"k. AS lw IewN coolant Cite@ Par saw (NFM critical, volume Mlnue Expansion (+) a Contraction (-) e33(V)-e37(T) Bdwe Readiae Alt" Reeding if ,j i{ AJ v r E iv O t� .r 4. )( N 1 5cq L v ' /8 v� 4.-4 I 1 8 7�— �- >�- 2- Aq ,61 z NZ zo d 2 nI r7o col so A-VZ o -,l 4=r 7- o - - S' 4 Z o S o " z O -..a- tee we Z rs 7 yo. z -�- ►0 30 9Q� / T Z S Q r 24D 7a -, � o / � � _ - 6 aw ICE Z f A1O r00 CN. - - 1,coo 38D -,020 159 — l DI ,006 oiz r'L 0 0 ,,onto a- �- - olo ,Oz e-4q1te, 619A10 and &4q U�li Gorr Gul6 Obi�v. I��ar�' Prado �<u 1 co Melsner ` %O,Rla Gy /� TANK FARM ROAD Verdes Dr. r `o j a Del $off Surburbon Road Ct. �0 , a O 1 C1,14 o Co Ord c P oras O � �Pr/d Vd C� w �'r� / 4,, Rdey a � a � m 101 Buckley c 1 0� o a 2 SITU MPP 16q/e?CZ G✓A?i &7 and &R)911e!1 i!5�? IU/h 6nD n0o-� ---Pao 2� p�OPO��D GNEl�L GOG�Ti�7�!✓ to c0 M N 0 cn� cc m 0 0 0 N Q m n d 2' Variable 2' Top of Zone of Saturation 10 to 15' IF 41 2' 1 "Tamper -proof" steel locking, cover loping concrete apron `r— Ground surface (well #1 will be at grade) 2" nominal Schedule 40 PVC flush threaded casing Cement/Bentonite seal: one sack of Portland cement to 4k-B gallons of Water; up to 4% Bentonite Bentonite pellets (sodium free) Flush -threaded joint, teflon-taped Clean, Washed No.3 Lapis luster sand filter 2" (nominal) PVC machine slotted section (0.020"slot size) 2" (nominal) PVC tail pipe Threaded end cap or plug 8" nominal boring MONITORING WELL SPECIFICATIONS Schematic - not to scale l� Judd Hull Associates, Geotechnical Consultants 22654 Watkins Street • Hayward, California 94541 • (415) 582-188G Ms. Lena L. Tam Kaiser Sand and Gravel Post Office Box 580 Pleasanton, California Company 94566 Judd P. Hui; 1926 1 ,• Howard D. Barlow, P E Proposal No. HP86051 June 3, 1986 SUBJECT: Monitoring Facility Installations Existing Underground Petroleum Tank 131 Suburban Road San Luis Obispo Dear Ms. Tam: In response to your request, we have visited the site of your San Luis Obispo Plant and have prepared this proposal to install monitoring wells adjacent to an existing 10,000 gallon diesel fuel tank. Based upon the topographic information contained on the U.S.G.S. San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach Quadrangles, the direction of ground- water flow in the area of the plant appears to be from the northeast to the southwest. Based upon previous investigations performed at this site, you have informed us that groundwater is at a depth of less than 20 feet. The California Underground Storage Tank Regulations require two groundwater monitoring wells for a single underground tank. One of the two wells should be located on the down -gradient side of the tank. Each groundwater monitoring well should extend 20 feet into groundwater or 5 feet into a clay aquitard underlying a shallower aquifer. An illustration showing the proposed configuration of the wells is included as Figure 1. We propose to offer the following services: 1. Coordination of our work with San Luis Obispo County including obtaining installation permits using this proposal as a basis for the proposed wells. Kaiser Sand and Gravel impany P. ?osal No. HP86051 June 3, 1986 2. The drilling and sampling from borings located within approximately 10 feet of the storage facilities. The borings would be drilled using eight -inch diameter hollow stem auger. Two-inch diameter PVC well screen and casing would ha used to construct the wells-.—The-wells_�to-uld--be backfilled as illustrated in Figure 1 following the requirements of the California Underground Storage Tank Regulations. We understand that backfill materials will be provided by the owner. 3. The soils found in the borings would be classified by the Unified Soil Classification System and logged by our representative during drilling and sampling. Soil sampling would be conducted starting from the ground surface, every five feet to the water table. Soil samples would be capped, refrigerated, and delivered to a chemical laboratory for testing. Water samples would also be taken, sealed, refrigerated, and delivered with the soil samples. The soil and water samples would be tested for hydrocarbon content by a State certified laboratory. 4. Approximate dimensions of the wells with respect to the above ground tank accessories and building locations would be measured after drilling using a 100-foot tape. A site plan, our borings logs, and the chemical test results would be compiled in a written report. We intend to take reasonable precautions during the drilling operations; however, we cannot be responsible for damage to under- ground utilities or structures not accurately indicated on plans provided to us. The cost for performing these services is presently estimated to be approximately $3,000.00 to $3,200.00, and includes drilling, sampling, and logging of the borehole; well development and water sampling; initial chemical analysis; and report preparation. Our fees would be determined on a time and materials basis in accordance with our current Fee Schedule, a copy of which is attached; however, we would not exceed the $3,200.00 figure without your written authorization. The Fee Schedule, which includes a STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS, the provisions of which would prevail throughout the course of our involvement in the project, should be considered a part of this proposal. 1 Kaiser Sand and Gravel -ompany 1 Pr.,posal No. HP86051 June 3, 1986 The quoted fees do not include the cost of monitoring services of the wells after installation, or construction of additional monitoring wells if required by the governing agency. We would be pleased to offer monitoring services on a time -required basis in accordance with our then -current Fee Schedule. Should this proposal meet your approval, please sign and return one copy to our office as our authorization to proceed with the work. Thank you for considering our firm for your geotechnical needs. Respectfully submitted, JHA GEOT ICAL CONSULTANTS, INC. <�� ward Barlow Soil Engineer C.E. 35734 HDB:kg Enclosures: Figure 1 - Proposed Well Profile Fee Schedule Distribution: Kaiser Sand and Gravel Company (2 Copies) APPROVAL: DATE: (Representing Kaiser Sand and Gravel Company) -3- end Judd Hull Associates, Geotechnical Consultants 22654 Watkins Street • Hayward, California 94541 • (415) 582-1880 Judd R, Hull 1928-1982 Howard D. Barlow, P.E Manager FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1986 JUDD HULL ASSOCIATES is a wholly -owned subsidiary of BSK & ASSOCIATES. BSK has in-house engineering, drilling, geology, materials and chemical testing laboratories. A more complete description of BSK's services and fee schedule will be provided on request. Charges for all work, including projects in progress, will be based on the most current Fee Schedule. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND OFFICE SERVICES 1. Principal or Consulting Engineer. . . . . . . . . . $ 75.00/Hr. 2. Staff Engineer/Geologist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.00/Hr. 3. Expert Witness Testimony, Per Day . . . . . . . . . 800.00 4. Expert Witness Testimony, Half Day. . . . . . . . . 500.00 5. Drafting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Hr. 6. Secretarial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.00/Hr. DRILLING CHARGES 1. Drill Rig and One Operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80.00/Hr. 2. Drill Rig and Two Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . 125.00/Hr. 1986 Fee Schedule Page 2 FIELD OBSERVATION TECHNICAL SERVICES 1. Field Technician (Soils, Concrete, Asphalt, Reinforcing Steel., —Etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._40._0.0./Hr. 2. Fi-e-ld Technicia-n---(-Equipped with Nuclear Density Gauge) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45.00/Hr. 3. Field Personnel Equipped as Requested and Charged Portal to Portal with: a) 1 Hour Minimum for Picking Up Concrete Cylinders; b) 2 Hour Minimum for Observation and Testing; c) Services Over Six Hours are an Eight -Hour Minimum; d) One and One -Half Times Regular Rate for Time in Excess of Eight Hours per Day, Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays. EQUIPMENT CHARGES 1. Vehicle* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.45/Mi. 2. Photovac Ultra Sensitive Portable Air Analyzer. . . 40.00/Hr. 3. Portable Power Auger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.00/Hr. 4. Nuclear Density Gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.00/Hr. 5. One -Channel Bison Seismograph . . . . . . . . . . . 7.00/Hr. 6. Inductive and Conductive Pipe Locator . . . . . . . 5.00/Hr. 7. Wood Moisture Meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.00/Day 8. Unimag Magnetometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.00/Hr. 9. Torvane or Penetrometer Tests . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50/Ea. 10. Sample Tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.50/Ea. *Applied to Job Sites Over 20 Miles from Hayward Office jna 1986 Fee Schedule Page 3 LABORATORY TESTS (Preparation of Sample, if Necessary; i.e., Remolded Spec imens_,—E.tc_._). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.0 0 /HL. Soils and Aggregates 1. Moisture Content Determination. . . . . . . . . . . $ 10.00/Ea. 2. Moisture Content and Unit Weight (Tube Samples) 20.00/Ea. 3. Plasticity Index (ASTM D-424) (Includes Liquid Limit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. 4. Liquid Limit (ASTM D-423) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.00/Ea. 5. Sieve Analyses (ASTM D-422 and'D-1140) a) Wash (Percent Passing No. 200-Sieve). 40.00/Ea. b) Coarse. . . . . . . . . . . . o 40.00/Ea. c) Fine, Including Wash. . . . . . . . 60.00/Ea. d) Coarse and Fine, Including Wash . . . . 80.00/Ea. 6. Hydrometer Analysis (ASTM D-422) (Without Sieve or Specific Gravity) . . . . . . . . 90.00/Ea. 7. Compaction Curves a) Standard Proctor (ASTM D-698; AASHTO T-99). . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. b) Four -inch Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557; AASHTO T-180) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120.00/Ea. c) Six-inch Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557; AASHTO T-180) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140.00/Ea. d) State of California 216G (Wet Method) . . 100.00/Ea. e) State of California 216G (Dry Method) . . 120.00/Ea. f) Check Point for Curve Identification. . . 60.00/Ea. 8. "R"-Value, California State Highway a) Untreated Soil or Aggregate . . . . . . . $155.00/Ea. b) Treated (Lime, Cement, Etc.) Soil or Aggregate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.00/Ea. 9. California Bearing Ratio (ASTM -1883) a) Method "D" at 100% Maximum Dry Density. . 325.00/Ea. b) Method "D" at 95% Maximum Dry Density . . 500.00/Ea. ina 1986 Fee Schedule Page 4 LABORATORY TESTS Soils and Aggregates - (Continued) 10. Sand Equivalent a) Average of Three par -California -state Highway._. . . . . . 70.00/Ea. b) One Point Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Ea. 11. Specific Gravity a) Soils (ASTM D-854). . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Ea. b) +3/4-inch Aggregate (ASTM C-127). 40.00/Ea. 12. Durability Factor a) Coarse Aggregate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. b) Fine Aggregate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. c) Combined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200.00/Ea. 13. Unconfined Compression of Soils . . . . . . . . . . 50.00/Ea. 14. Direct Shear Tests (ASTM D-3080) a) Quick, Native or Tube . . . . . . . . . . 150.00/Ea. b) Quick, Remolded . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200.00/Ea. c) Consolidated, Quick . . . . . . . . . . . 250.00/Ea. 15. Consolidation/Swell Tests a) Consolidation Test (ASTM D-2435) ($250.00 Minimum) . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.00/Pt. b) Swell Test (FHA Specifications) . . . . . 100.00/Ea. c) Expansion Index Test (UBCS 29-2). . . . . 150.00/Ea. d) Shrinkage Limit (ASTM D-427). . . . . . . 100.00/Ea. 16. Soil Cement/Lime or CTB/LTB Mix Design. . . . . Quote on Request 17. Permeability Tests a) Constant Head, Granular Soils (ASTM D-2434) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130.00/Ea. b) Falling Head, Granular Soils. . . . . . . 150.00/Ea. c) Other Forms of Permeability Tests . . Quote on Request .JIB 19860 Fee Schedule Page 5 LABORATORY TESTS Soils and Aggregates - (Continued) 18. Los Angeles Rattler Test, Small Size Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C-131) . . . . . . . . . . . 80.00/Ea. Large Size Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C-131). . . . . 100.00/Ea. 19. Sulfate Soundness (5 Cycles), per Sieve Size. 60.00/Ea. Minimum Charge per Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225.00/Ea. Asphalt/Concrete 1. Unit Weight of AC Core or Compacted Sample (ASTM D-2726 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30.00/Ea. 2. Unit Weight of Concrete Cylinders . . . . . . . . . 20.00/Ea. 3. Asphalt Coring. . . . . . . . . . .Technician Rate + $20.00/Core 4. Concrete Compression Tests (ASTM C-39) (Including Mold) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.00/Ea. 5. Cylinder Handled, Cured but Not Tested. . . . . . . 10.00/Ea. 6. Proportion of Cement in Hardened Concrete (ASTM C-85 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150.00/Ea. 7. Flexural Test of Concrete Beam (ASTM C-293 or ASTM C-78 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00/Ea. LABORATORY TESTS Prices for Other Soil, Materials, and Chemical Testing Available Upon Request. OUTSIDE SERVICES Drilling, trenching, bulldozing and similar contract work in connection with the exploration for which we administer a subcontract will be charged at a cost plus 15%. Per diem on projects which require lodging will be charged at cost plus 15% with a minimum charge of $50.00/day/person. THE ATTACHED STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS IS A PART OF THIS FEE SCHEDULE jna STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS 1. Payment Invoices for Judd Hull Associates' (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant") services will be submitted at his option, on a monthly basis, either as final or progress billing. Invoices will be mailed to the Client and will be due _ immediaWy, but will not be delinquent if paid on or before the 30th day following the date of the invoice. If payment is not so made, under provisions r of this agreement, a late payment SERVICE CHARGE will be computed at the periodic rate of 1.5% per month, which is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%, and will be applied to any unpaid balance commencing 30 days after the date of the original_invoice. If suit is filed, a reasonable attorney's fee, to be set by the court, shall be included in any judgement in Consultant's favor. Retainer fees may be charged as assessed in the job proposal. In the event of Termination, the retainer fee will be returned to the Client, minus the sum of fees for services performed plus reasonable termination expenses. 2. Limitation of Liability and Waiver on Condition In performing professional services, Consultant will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable members of the profession practicing in the same or similar locality. No, other warranty, expressed or implied, is made or intended by the proposal for professional services or by furnishing oral or written reports of the findings made. Unless special arrangements are made in writing, prior to commencement of work, it is agreed that the Client will limit any and all liability, claim for damages, cost of defense, or expenses to be levied against the Consultant on account of any design defect, error, omission, or professional negligence to a sum not to exceed.$50,000, or the amount of his fee, whichever is greater. Further, the Client agrees to notify any contractor or subconstractor who may perform work in connection with any design, report, or study prepared by the Consultant of such limitation of liability for design defects, errors, omissions, or professional negligence, and require as a condition precedent to their performing the work a like limitation of liability on their part as against the Consultant. In the event the Client fails to obtain a like limitation of liability provision as to design defects, errors, omissions, or professional negligence, any liability of the Client and the Consultant to such contractor or subcontractor arising out of an alleged design defect, error, ommision, or professional negligence shall be allocated between the Client and the Consultant in such a manner that the aggregate liability for the Consultant for such design defect to all parties, including the Client, shall not exceed $50,000 or the amount of the Consultant's fee, whichever is greater. 3. Disputes In the event that a dispute should arise relating to the performance of the services to be provided under this Agreement, and should that dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including staff time, court costs, attorneys' fees, and other claim -related expenses. end 4. Warranty of Authority to Sign The person signing this contract warrants he has authority as, or on behalf of, the Client for whom or for whose benefit the Consultant's services are rendered. If such a person does not have such authority, he agrees that he is personally liable for all breaches of the terms and bases for the Consultant's services, and that in any action against him for breach of such warranty, a reasonable attorney's fee shall be included in any judgement rendered. S. Project Information Client will make available to Consultant all information regarding existing and proposed conditions of the site. The information shall include, but not be limited to. -plot -plans., topographical -surveys, -hydro.- graphic data, and previous soils data, including borings, field or laboratory tests, and written reports. Client will immediately transmit to Consultant any new information which becomes available or any change in plans. Consultant shall not be liable for any incorrect advise, judgement, or decision based on any inaccurate information furnished by Client, and Client will indemnify Consultant against claims demands or liability arising out of or contributed to by such information. 6. Right of Entry The Client will provide for right of entry of the Consultant and all necessary equipment or personnel, in order to complete the work. The Client shall also notify any and all possessors of the project site, whether they be lawfully or unlawfully in possession, that the Client has granted Consultant free access to the project site. While Consultant will take all reasonable precautions to minimize any damage to the property or nearby properties, it is understood by Client that in the normal course of work some damage may occur, the correction of which may, at Consultant's option, be repaired by Consultant and billed at cost to Client. 7. Utilities In the prosecution of this work, the Consultant will take reasonable precautions to avoid damage or injury to subterranean structures or utilities. The Client agrees to hold the Consultant and his agents harmless for any damages to subterranean structures which are not called to Consultant's attention and correctly shown on the plans furnished. 8. Samples All samples of soil and rock will be destroyed 30 days after Submission of our report unless the Client advises us otherwise. Upon request, the Consultant will deliver samples to the Client, charges collect, or will store them -for the Client for an agreed storage charge. 9. Ownership of Documents Reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by the Consultant, as instruments of service, shall remain the property of the Consultant. jna Client agrees that reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents, which is not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by the Client for any purpose whatever. The Consultant will retain pertinent records relating to the services performed for a period of five years following submission of the report, during which period the records will be made available to the Client at reasonable times. Services provided within this agreement are for the exclusive use of the Client. Service performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is mom. Client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the location where borings, surveys, or explorations are made by the Consultant and that the data, interpretations and recommendations of the Consultant are based solely on the information available to him. The Consultant will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretation by others of the information developed. 11. Insurance The Consultant represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed by it is and are protected by worker's compensation insurance and that Consultant has such coverage under public liability and property damage insurance policies which the Consultant deems to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shall be provided to Client upon request in writing. Within the limits and conditions of such insurance, Consultant agrees to indemnify and save Client harmless from and against any loss, damage, or liability arising from any negligent acts by Consultant, its agents, staff, and outside consultants employed by it. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability beyond the amounts, limits, and conditions of such insurance. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any loss, damage, or liability arising from any acts by Client, its agents, staff, and other consultants employed by it. 12. Termination This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be effective if that substantial failure has been remedied before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for services performed to the termination notice date plus reasonable termination expenses. In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three months, prior to completion of all reports contemplated by this Agreement, Consultant may complete such analyses and records as are necessary to complete his files and may also complete a report on the services performed to the date of notice of termination or suspension. The expenses of termination or suspension shall include all direct costs of Consultant in completing such analyses, records and reports. end 13. Assigns Neither the Client nor the Consultant may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer his duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. 14. Notice to Property Owner If bills are not paid in full for the labor, services, equipment, or materials fu nished or to —be furnished, a mec anic's lien Leading o Lhe loss, through cour forec osure proceedings, of ail or of -Owner s property being so improved may be placed against the property even though Owner has paid his contractor in full. Owner may wish to protect himself against this consequence by (1)requiring contractor to furnish a signed release by the person or firm giving this notice before making payment to contractor, or (2)any other method or device which is appropriate under the circumstances. 15. Backfill Consultant shall backfill all borings or excavations within a reasonable time of completion of explorations. Backfill will be compacted to the extent possible based on the limitations of the equipment used. Settlement of such backfill may occur. Unless otherwise agreed upon, the Client shall fill settled areas as needed. The Consultant shall not be responsible for damage or accidents as the result of improperly backfilled excavations. 16. Construction, Observation and Testing The Client agrees that in accordance with generally accepted practices, the construction Contractor will assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including the safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall be made to apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and Client further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the Consultant harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in conncection with the performance of the work on this project, excepting liability arising from the sole negligence of the Consultant. The Consultant will not be responsible for the general safety on the site or the work of the contractors and third parties. The presence of the Consultant's field representative will be for the purpose of providing observation and field testing. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. The contractor for the project should be so advised. The contractor should also be informed that neither the presence of our field representative nor the observation and testing by our firm shall excuse him in any way for defects discovered in his work. The Consultant shall not be liable or responsible in any manner whatsoever for any damage or earth movement arising in whole or part from any previous construction work performed on the project, adjacent projects, or subsequent work performed by Client or third parties. end I 15. TANK TO TEST I 16. CAPACI I Y tl i Lit! Nominal Capacity ze npe 14enuty or o"hah Ganwu SoitIhere doubt as to True Capacity 7 rang doraw e Section "DETERMINING TANK CAPACITY" f IUIII =J Tank Chart Ur rtrer chart ere 'I J enManufacturer's Chart capacity chart evait. / GO— Company Engineering Data Charts supplied with `I%T& J Other 17. FILL -UP FOR TEST Stick Readings Total Gallons to vourt. Gotten# on. Reading Slick Water Sartain /��9 before Fill-up" . — Inventory t K Gallons FIII up. STICK BEFORE AND AFTER EACH COMPARTMENT DROP OR EACH METERED DELIVERY QUANTITY / d Product In full tank to fill / Tank Olenrosar y (up pipe)— 18. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES TO TEST THIS TANK 3;L (�2 gO VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM Rrra manual ernlinna applinahln Chnck holnw and record procedure in log (26). 7 stage I Water In tank High water table In lank excavation Ej Line(#) bung tesico wlm LVLLT Stage 11 21. TEMPERATURE/VOLUME FACTOR (a) TO TEST THIS TANK 19. TANK MEASUREMENTS FOR Is Today Warmer? i , Colder? I i —° F Product in Tank _° F Fill -up Product on Truck _° F Expected Change ( + or - ) TSTT ASSEMBLY Sworn of tank to Gretfa a .................. 22. Thermal -Sensor reading after circulation/7_1 7— 7F Add 30" for 4" L ................. 7 '] �ao� Newau Add 24" for 3" L or air seal ... 23. Digits per °F in range of expected changed Total tubing to assemble Approximate digits 20. EXTENSION HOSE SETTING // 24• ��SQ/ x rDOOSt ist6!SI383L gallons to quantity in coefficient at expanalen for volume change In this lank Tank top to grade lull tank (16 or 17) Involved product per °F Extend hoes on auction tube 6" or more /n1 7�/-yea r�tY �L � �/ /� /a,�(/. / below tank top _ 25. _ . ✓ [) ✓ t ✓ . a _ This is volume change per °F (24) Digits per °F In test Volume change per dlglt. teal 'if Fill pipe extends above grade, use lop of fill. Range (23) Compute to 4 decimal places. factor (a) LOG OF TEST PROCEDURES 30. HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE 31. VOLUME MEASUREMENTS IR 34. TEMPERATURE COMPENSATIW 38.NET VOLUME CHANGES 39. ACCUMULATED CONTROL RECORD TO .NI CAL. USE FACIOA la) EACH READING CHANGE 28. Record details of setting u D P 29. Aaadiq Standpipe tevel a Inches 32. Product in Graduals Product Replaced (-) 36. 36. change 37. Computation Temperature Adjustment At HIM Leas rocard Tine Eau 0elkcUoe / and running lest. (Use full No Beginning Level to Thermal Sensor Higher + Lower - (0 • (a) - Expansion + Volume Minus M Leo LwH compel - length of line if needed.( of which Be(a,. Altar Product Reading (c) Contraction - Expansion (+) or Contraction (-) choose per New / Reading Restored Reading Reading Recovered(+) v33(V)-e371T) (NFPA crNxiel 7 A ovl,r I o 093 NA /I tel;1--f— -F. /Yd6 Ba-c/i i /a "i MW-MMM wog®��i■■■i��� >.. ii _ .row- ©Imm • � mimlE ��� 24 Hr. Phone R.W. WILLIAMS, INC. 928-7311 Certified Tank Testing ($00) 05Z4�1- 21I!r3 Kaiser Sand & Gravel P.O. Box 580 Pleasanton Ga.-if. �,4;66 Attn: Lena Tam 239 E. Newlove Santa Maria, CA. RCCZiv�:) On October 10, 1985 the #2 Diesel fuel tank located at the San Luis Obispo batch plant was tested. Results of testing indicate that the above mentioned tank is tight accumulated change over a period of one hour was less than .05 gal. per hour. Variable factors such as tempature changes of the product in the tank,tempature stratification of the product in the tank, tank end deflection and the presents of any ground water around the tank, was taken into consideration and either compensated for or eliminated. This certification is not to be considered a garentee of continued tight worthyness but rather an indication of current condition. ' sy r Richard W. Williams President R .W .WILLIAMS , INC .