Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout_Email Batch ready1 From:no-reply@slocity.org Sent:Friday, December 12, 2025 11:46 AM To:Building Subject:Plan Review Extension or Permit Extension form Attachments:Plan Review Extension or Permit Extension.pdf Hi, A new Plan Review Extension or Permit Extension form was submitted. Best Regards. Plan Review Extension or Permit Extension Community Development Building and Safety Division 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 In order for Building and Safety to process your request, please provide the information below a minimum of 10 business days prior to the expiration of your project. Please note that submitting this request is not a guarantee of an extension. Address * Assessor’s Parcel No.* Request For * Plan Review Number or Permit Number (s)* Justification for request Project Location and Information City San Luis Obispo State / Province / Region CA Postal / Zip Code 93401 Country United States Street Address 1424 Hansen Ln. Address Line 2 4719024 Plan Review Extension Building Permit Extension 4382025 Contractor delay, easement issue, possible plan modifications. Applicant’s Information How are you related to the project?* Your Name (First and Last)* Email * Phone * Company Contact during permit process (if other than permit applicant) I / We request an extension of time: Print Name * Signature * Date * NOTE: The above request to extend the above plan review/permit pertains only to Building and Safety. It is the applicant's/ owner's responsibility to verify whether the approval obtained from other City divisions and outside agencies is still current before continuing with the above applicant/permit. Status New Expiration Date Code Updates Required Fee Required Reviewed by * Owner Owner’s agent Tenant Tenant’s agent Contractor Contractor’s agent Architect Architect’s agent Engineer Engineer’s agent Kevin Lewis kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com 8054713829 Owner Kevin Lewis 12/10/2025 For Staff Use Only Approved Denied YES NO YES NO Date * Conditions of approval/denial 2 From:Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2025 4:34 PM To:Stanley, Erin Subject:Re: 1424 Hansen BLDG-0438-2025 Extension Link Hi Erin, Thank you for the link. I have a few more question: If we file an extension now, will it override our January 19 deadline? If so, the extension will start say Dec.12,2025? Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Stanley, Erin <EStanley@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 10:59 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: 1424 Hansen BLDG-0438-2025 Extension Link Good morning Sherman, Please see the below link to the permit extension form. If you need anything further, please let me know. New Submission Thank you, Erin Stanley Permit Technician I Community Development E EStanley@slocity.org T 805.781.7159 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 3 From:Savage, Melissa Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2025 4:27 PM To:Sherman Damuag Subject:Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, I am not sure. I would ask somebody from the Building Department as they would know better than me. Please let me know if you have any difficulty contacting them and I will do my best to help out. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 3:13 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, If we file an extension now, will it override our January 19 deadline? If so, the extension will start say Dec.12,2025? Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 4 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 2:52 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Yes, I asked two people from the building department and they agreed it was 180 calendar days, not working days. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 2:24 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement HI Melissa, I talked to her on the phone this morning, she said 180 working days. Could you clarify/confirm that for me please? Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 2:20 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, 5 I would double check with Erin. I think the 180 days are not working days but calendar days. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 2:15 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, I have talked to Erin Stanley, and said there is 180 working days from the last submission. Therefore, from the last submission 7/23, which means we have until April 1, 2026. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 2:00 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, My understanding is that if you submit again by January 19, 2026, you do not need to file an extension. If you have more questions about extensions, please contact the Building Department at building@slocity.org. Thank you, 6 Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2025 10:41 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Mellisa, Do we need to file an extension for Enclave Lot 24? Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 7 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, 8 I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 19 From:Stanley, Erin Sent:Thursday, December 11, 2025 10:59 AM To:Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com Subject:1424 Hansen BLDG-0438-2025 Extension Link Good morning Sherman, Please see the below link to the permit extension form. If you need anything further, please let me know. New Submission Thank you, Erin Stanley Permit Technician I Community Development E EStanley@slocity.org T 805.781.7159 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 20 From:noreply@slocity.org Sent:Wednesday, December 10, 2025 5:14 PM To:Mezzapesa, John; Nichols, Vanessa; Nelson, Trevor Subject:A form has been submitted. Attachments:Plan Review Extension or Permit Extension.pdf Categories:Respond Click here to view the submission in a Web browser. After reviewing it, you can make your approval decision. Click here to open this task in Forms. Plan Review Extension or Permit Extension Community Development Building and Safety Division 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 In order for Building and Safety to process your request, please provide the information below a minimum of 10 business days prior to the expiration of your project. Please note that submitting this request is not a guarantee of an extension. Address * Assessor’s Parcel No.* Request For * Plan Review Number or Permit Number (s)* Justification for request Project Location and Information City San Luis Obispo State / Province / Region CA Postal / Zip Code 93401 Country United States Street Address 1424 Hansen Ln. Address Line 2 4719024 Plan Review Extension Building Permit Extension 4382025 Contractor delay, easement issue, possible plan modifications. Applicant’s Information How are you related to the project?* Your Name (First and Last)* Email * Phone * Company Contact during permit process (if other than permit applicant) I / We request an extension of time: Print Name * Signature * Date * NOTE: The above request to extend the above plan review/permit pertains only to Building and Safety. It is the applicant's/ owner's responsibility to verify whether the approval obtained from other City divisions and outside agencies is still current before continuing with the above applicant/permit. Status New Expiration Date Code Updates Required Fee Required Reviewed by * Owner Owner’s agent Tenant Tenant’s agent Contractor Contractor’s agent Architect Architect’s agent Engineer Engineer’s agent Kevin Lewis kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com 8054713829 Owner Kevin Lewis 12/10/2025 For Staff Use Only Approved Denied YES NO YES NO Date * Conditions of approval/denial 21 From:kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com Sent:Tuesday, December 9, 2025 4:17 PM To:Corey, Tyler; 'Donna Lewis' Cc:'Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com)' Subject:RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Thanks Tyler! Kevin Lewis Certified Residential Appraiser License #: AR030129 Central Coast Appraisal Services, Inc. 3940 Broad St., Suite 7 #326 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Ph.: 805-543-9500 Fax: 805-543-9501 Cell.: 805-471-3826 Email: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 3:59 PM To: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com; 'Donna Lewis' <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Cc: 'Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com)' < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Kevin, The subject building permit expires on 01/23/2026. I have provided a link below to the building permit extension form for your use. I would suggest completing the form and explain the circumstances for needing an extension. If an extension is granted they are one time and for up to 180 days. https://forms.slocity.org/Forms/Plan-Review-Extension-or-Permit-Extension Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 22 From: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 2:29 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; 'Donna Lewis' <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Cc: 'Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com)' < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Tyler, Are you able to tell me when the initial building permit is set to expire and if we would be able to extend if needed? Kevin Lewis Certified Residential Appraiser License #: AR030129 Central Coast Appraisal Services, Inc. 3940 Broad St., Suite 7 #326 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Ph.: 805-543-9500 Fax: 805-543-9501 Cell.: 805-471-3826 Email: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 2:20 PM To: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Donna, We updated the owner information in our system to show you and Kevin as the property owners. Vellum only paid the initial building permit intake fee of $7,777. Going forward we will only charge for the building permit review time on an hourly staff time basis. Please let us know when you resubmit so we can update our system with the new architect information. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org 23 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 1:39 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Tyler…just one more question. Can you let us know if any fees have been paid at all by Vellum? If so, what fees have been paid and what is left to pay? We are going to move forward with another architect and builder at this point so need to get our ducks in a row. Thanks. BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 Email Me Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. 24 From: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:42 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Thank you again for your time Tyler. Based on our discussion, is it possible to change the lot owner in your system to Kevin & Donna Lewis? Paul is not the owner of the lot. We’d like this cleaned up in case we do decide to proceed with another architect and builder. Thanks. BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 Email Me Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:14 AM 25 To: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement fyi From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 9:35 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I was able to connect with Gabriel and the City Attorney’s Office regarding the process to amend the utility easement from 15’ to 10’ along the rear of Lot 24. This amendment would require a modification to the tract map per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. The planning application fee for a modification is $8,633.02 (25% of the current filing fee for a Tentative Tract Map). This process would require a public hearing before the reviewing authority, which in this case is City Council since they originally took final action on the tract map. I have linked the Planning Application and checklist for your use. If you have authority to process the amendment differently the City would be happy to consider this information. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:53 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Tyler, I have requested a formal response from Mike Stanton. Nothing yet. Were you able to connect with Gabriel? Can we schedule a time to discuss and lay out a plan to make this process as simple as possible? It really seems arduous and has already cost the project several months. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, 26 Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 27 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this 28 application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, 29 Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development 30 Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag 31 o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 32 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Tuesday, December 9, 2025 3:54 PM To:Nichols, Vanessa Subject:RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Excellent – thanks! From: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 3:40 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement It expires on 01/23/2026. Find the link to the extension form below. They can get that submitted and have them be sure to explain the circumstances for needing the extension. Could probably give them a one time 180 day extension. Link to extension form: https://forms.slocity.org/Forms/Plan-Review-Extension-or-Permit-Extension Vanessa Nichols Building Permit Services Supervisor Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E vnichols@slocity.org T 805.781.7588 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 3:33 PM To: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Are you able to see when this permit will expire in EPL? Thanks From: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 2:29 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; 'Donna Lewis' <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Cc: 'Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com)' <lewisslo6090@gmail.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Tyler, Are you able to tell me when the initial building permit is set to expire and if we would be able to extend if needed? 33 Kevin Lewis Certified Residential Appraiser License #: AR030129 Central Coast Appraisal Services, Inc. 3940 Broad St., Suite 7 #326 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Ph.: 805-543-9500 Fax: 805-543-9501 Cell.: 805-471-3826 Email: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 2:20 PM To: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Donna, We updated the owner information in our system to show you and Kevin as the property owners. Vellum only paid the initial building permit intake fee of $7,777. Going forward we will only charge for the building permit review time on an hourly staff time basis. Please let us know when you resubmit so we can update our system with the new architect information. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 1:39 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement 34 Tyler…just one more question. Can you let us know if any fees have been paid at all by Vellum? If so, what fees have been paid and what is left to pay? We are going to move forward with another architect and builder at this point so need to get our ducks in a row. Thanks. BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 Email Me Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. From: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:42 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Thank you again for your time Tyler. Based on our discussion, is it possible to change the lot owner in your system to Kevin & Donna Lewis? Paul is not the owner of the lot. We’d like this cleaned up in case we do decide to proceed with another architect and builder. Thanks. 35 BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 Email Me Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:14 AM To: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement fyi From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 9:35 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, 36 I was able to connect with Gabriel and the City Attorney’s Office regarding the process to amend the utility easement from 15’ to 10’ along the rear of Lot 24. This amendment would require a modification to the tract map per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. The planning application fee for a modification is $8,633.02 (25% of the current filing fee for a Tentative Tract Map). This process would require a public hearing before the reviewing authority, which in this case is City Council since they originally took final action on the tract map. I have linked the Planning Application and checklist for your use. If you have authority to process the amendment differently the City would be happy to consider this information. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:53 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Tyler, I have requested a formal response from Mike Stanton. Nothing yet. Were you able to connect with Gabriel? Can we schedule a time to discuss and lay out a plan to make this process as simple as possible? It really seems arduous and has already cost the project several months. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 37 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott 38 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer 39 Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. 40 However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 41 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 42 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 43 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Friday, November 21, 2025 2:29 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-008 RNEW Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-008_CTYSLO_RNEW.GML; 2025042902791-008_CTYSLO_RNEW.XML; 2025042902791-008.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 4378423 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 008 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2025042902791 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 007 SEQUENCE NO= 33229100 TRANSMISSION ID= 13 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-11-21T14:28:11-08:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-12-19T23:59:59-08:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= RNEW TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 44 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL, CTYSLO, CHASLO [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 45 From:kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com Sent:Friday, November 21, 2025 1:50 PM To:Corey, Tyler Cc:'Kerry Margason'; thomas@esserstudios.com; 'Donna & Kevin D. Lewis'; 'Paul Abbott' Subject:RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Got it – thanks again Tyler. From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2025 10:34 AM To: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com Cc: 'Kerry Margason' <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com>; thomas@esserstudios.com; 'Donna & Kevin D. Lewis' <lewisslo6090@gmail.com>; 'Paul Abbott' <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hi Kevin, The map amendment would require a public hearing before the reviewing authority, which in this case is City Council since they originally took final action on the tract map. Staff would need to evaluate your amendment request and provide a recommendation to City Council. I would say it depends on what your request is whether Engineering would support or not. Council agendas for public hearing items are currently full/closed until July 2026. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2025 9:53 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; 'Paul Abbott' <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: 'Kerry Margason' <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com>; thomas@esserstudios.com; 'Donna & Kevin D. Lewis' < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hi Tyler, 46 Just so I understand completely, the amendment to the map would take a public hearing, recommendation from Engineering (which would likely be against) and wouldn’t even get on the calendar for a hearing until possibly June or July? Thank you for your time on this. Kevin Lewis Certified Residential Appraiser License #: AR030129 Central Coast Appraisal Services, Inc. 3940 Broad St., Suite 7 #326 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Ph.: 805-543-9500 Fax: 805-543-9501 Cell.: 805-471-3826 Email: kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2025 4:22 PM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; thomas@esserstudios.com Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hi Paul, Thank you for the additional information. I have reviewed with our City Attorney’s Office and reaffirm our determination that the easement amendment would require a modification to the tract map per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. The easement was established on the subdivision map when parcels were under common ownership (by subdivider), and Vellum’s subsequent ownership of both parcels did not automatically extinguish the easement recorded on final map. At this time, parcels are not under common ownership, so merger doctrine does not effect an extinguishment under current ownership conditions. That said, even if the owners of lot 22 and lot 24 agreed to the modified easement, a final map has been recorded showing this 15’ storm drain and sewer easement to the benefit of lot 22. The Subdivision Map Act requires an amendment to the map to reflect a new storm drain and sewer easement that benefits lot 22 and that meets the City’s standards. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org 47 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2025 9:41 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; thomas@esserstudios.com Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hello again Tyler, I did hear back from Mike Stanton’s office and wanted to share their response in hopes it would add clarity and a simple path forward for processing this permit. Please review below and attached and let me know your thoughts. Thank you in advance for your continued support. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2025 4:22 PM To: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Macy Sheets <MSheets@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hi Paul – Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. The easement shown on the map is an “appurtenant” easement, which means it appends to the lot it serves and generally speaking it “runs with the land.” Under California Civil Code 805 – A servitude (easement) thereon cannot be held by the owner of the servient tenement – in plain language, this means the owner of the property cannot have an easement to serve that property. Under California Civil Code 811 – a servitude is extinguished: 1. By the vesting of the right to the servitude and the right to the servient tenement in the same person (THIS IS YOU). Based on these sections in the Civil Code – any easement between the two properties would be extinguished because Vellum owns both lots. It would be worthwhile to ask Mr. Corey what he is basing the requirement to amend the map on. 48 The Map Act does make provisions for amending the map, but they address the “additional map page” and documents recorded concurrently with the map, not items on the map itself. In your case, the Storm Drain Agreement (attached) was recorded with the map. The Map Act would allow a map amendment to revise this document. I do not see anything in the document that speaks to the relocation/resizing of a storm drain easement. However, the document refers to other documents that I could not review, such as the operations and maintenance agreement. Is there any prohibition in that document about relocating/resizing a drainage easement? Some thoughts on the City’s position: The City reviewed the map and tentative map and one of the things they looked at was stormwater runoff – they okay’d the layout of the lots, okay’d the drainage system and the easements as shown on the map. If you can show, through the storm drain documents (maybe an addendum to the Storm Water study) the modification will not result in additional runoff, or debris in the storm water, they may relax their position and allow you to move forward. They may require a new easement agreement or something, but not the whole map amendment process. Feel free to call me if you have any questions about this information. Kerry Margason 3559 S. Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 594-1960 kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Office hours: MTWTF 10:00-5:00 From: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:46 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement I'll let Kerry respond, since she has the legal background.... From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:49 PM To: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Mike and Kerry, It seems we are still stock on the issue of having revised the private utility easement on Lot 22 and 24 Hansen Lane. The County maintains this action requires an amendment to the recorded Map which needs to go back before City Council to approve. 49 Tyler Corey (per email below ) has asked me to reach back out to you to seek clarity on this issue. Please see email below and advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 50 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. 51 For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 52 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement 53 Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). 54 This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 55 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Thursday, November 20, 2025 4:22 PM To:Paul Abbott Cc:Kerry Margason; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com); thomas@esserstudios.com Subject:RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hi Paul, Thank you for the additional information. I have reviewed with our City Attorney’s Office and reaffirm our determination that the easement amendment would require a modification to the tract map per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. The easement was established on the subdivision map when parcels were under common ownership (by subdivider), and Vellum’s subsequent ownership of both parcels did not automatically extinguish the easement recorded on final map. At this time, parcels are not under common ownership, so merger doctrine does not effect an extinguishment under current ownership conditions. That said, even if the owners of lot 22 and lot 24 agreed to the modified easement, a final map has been recorded showing this 15’ storm drain and sewer easement to the benefit of lot 22. The Subdivision Map Act requires an amendment to the map to reflect a new storm drain and sewer easement that benefits lot 22 and that meets the City’s standards. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2025 9:41 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; thomas@esserstudios.com Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hello again Tyler, 56 I did hear back from Mike Stanton’s office and wanted to share their response in hopes it would add clarity and a simple path forward for processing this permit. Please review below and attached and let me know your thoughts. Thank you in advance for your continued support. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2025 4:22 PM To: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Macy Sheets <MSheets@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hi Paul – Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. The easement shown on the map is an “appurtenant” easement, which means it appends to the lot it serves and generally speaking it “runs with the land.” Under California Civil Code 805 – A servitude (easement) thereon cannot be held by the owner of the servient tenement – in plain language, this means the owner of the property cannot have an easement to serve that property. Under California Civil Code 811 – a servitude is extinguished: 1. By the vesting of the right to the servitude and the right to the servient tenement in the same person (THIS IS YOU). Based on these sections in the Civil Code – any easement between the two properties would be extinguished because Vellum owns both lots. It would be worthwhile to ask Mr. Corey what he is basing the requirement to amend the map on. The Map Act does make provisions for amending the map, but they address the “additional map page” and documents recorded concurrently with the map, not items on the map itself. In your case, the Storm Drain Agreement (attached) was recorded with the map. The Map Act would allow a map amendment to revise this document. I do not see anything in the document that speaks to the relocation/resizing of a storm drain easement. However, the document refers to other documents that I could not review, such as the operations and maintenance agreement. Is there any prohibition in that document about relocating/resizing a drainage easement? Some thoughts on the City’s position: The City reviewed the map and tentative map and one of the things they looked at was stormwater runoff – they okay’d the layout of the lots, okay’d the drainage system and the easements as shown on the map. If you can show, through the storm drain documents (maybe an addendum to the Storm Water study) the modification will not result in additional runoff, or debris in the storm water, they may relax their position and allow you to move forward. They may require a new easement agreement or something, but not the whole map amendment process. 57 Feel free to call me if you have any questions about this information. Kerry Margason 3559 S. Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 594-1960 kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Office hours: MTWTF 10:00-5:00 From: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:46 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement I'll let Kerry respond, since she has the legal background.... From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:49 PM To: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Mike and Kerry, It seems we are still stock on the issue of having revised the private utility easement on Lot 22 and 24 Hansen Lane. The County maintains this action requires an amendment to the recorded Map which needs to go back before City Council to approve. Tyler Corey (per email below ) has asked me to reach back out to you to seek clarity on this issue. Please see email below and advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 58 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 59 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications 60 do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 61 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers 62 Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. 63 Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 64 From:Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent:Monday, November 17, 2025 9:41 AM To:Corey, Tyler Cc:Kerry Margason; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com); thomas@esserstudios.com Subject:FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Attachments:2022-021544 Stormdrain Agreement.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Categories:w For Response Hello again Tyler, I did hear back from Mike Stanton’s office and wanted to share their response in hopes it would add clarity and a simple path forward for processing this permit. Please review below and attached and let me know your thoughts. Thank you in advance for your continued support. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2025 4:22 PM To: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Macy Sheets <MSheets@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement (MBS 23-321) Hi Paul – Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. The easement shown on the map is an “appurtenant” easement, which means it appends to the lot it serves and generally speaking it “runs with the land.” Under California Civil Code 805 – A servitude (easement) thereon cannot be held by the owner of the servient tenement – in plain language, this means the owner of the property cannot have an easement to serve that property. Under California Civil Code 811 – a servitude is extinguished: 65 1. By the vesting of the right to the servitude and the right to the servient tenement in the same person (THIS IS YOU). Based on these sections in the Civil Code – any easement between the two properties would be extinguished because Vellum owns both lots. It would be worthwhile to ask Mr. Corey what he is basing the requirement to amend the map on. The Map Act does make provisions for amending the map, but they address the “additional map page” and documents recorded concurrently with the map, not items on the map itself. In your case, the Storm Drain Agreement (attached) was recorded with the map. The Map Act would allow a map amendment to revise this document. I do not see anything in the document that speaks to the relocation/resizing of a storm drain easement. However, the document refers to other documents that I could not review, such as the operations and maintenance agreement. Is there any prohibition in that document about relocating/resizing a drainage easement? Some thoughts on the City’s position: The City reviewed the map and tentative map and one of the things they looked at was stormwater runoff – they okay’d the layout of the lots, okay’d the drainage system and the easements as shown on the map. If you can show, through the storm drain documents (maybe an addendum to the Storm Water study) the modification will not result in additional runoff, or debris in the storm water, they may relax their position and allow you to move forward. They may require a new easement agreement or something, but not the whole map amendment process. Feel free to call me if you have any questions about this information. Kerry Margason 3559 S. Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 594-1960 kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Office hours: MTWTF 10:00-5:00 From: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:46 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement I'll let Kerry respond, since she has the legal background.... From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:49 PM To: Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com> Cc: Kerry Margason <KMargason@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Mike and Kerry, 66 It seems we are still stock on the issue of having revised the private utility easement on Lot 22 and 24 Hansen Lane. The County maintains this action requires an amendment to the recorded Map which needs to go back before City Council to approve. Tyler Corey (per email below ) has asked me to reach back out to you to seek clarity on this issue. Please see email below and advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 67 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to 68 eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. 69 best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM 70 To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, 71 I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 1 of 3 2 of 3 3 of 3 72 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Friday, November 14, 2025 4:32 PM To:Paul Abbott Cc:Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com); Donna Lewis Subject:RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Please see responses below to your questions. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 10:43 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Tyler, Thank you for the follow-up and for taking the time to coordinate with Gabriel and the City Attorney’s Office. I appreciate the clarity on the City’s current interpretation of the process and the references to Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. That said, I’m really hoping you might be willing to help us find the most practical, time- and cost-efficient way forward. As you know, this is a private storm drain and sewer easement between two lots (Lots 22 and 24). From our perspective, we’re not seeking to change public rights or introduce new burdens on any other property owner – we’re simply trying to reconcile the recorded easement with what has been approved so we can move this single-family home forward. The project has already experienced several months of delay tied specifically to this easement issue, and the added cost and uncertainty of a full tract map modification and City Council hearing for what is essentially a private adjustment between two commonly owned lots is very difficult for us and our client to absorb. I am respectfully asking for your help and guidance in any or all of the following ways:  Explore any possible staff-level pathway or interpretation (The City has determined that the easement amendment would require a modification to the tract map per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. The planning application fee for a modification is $8,633.02 (25% of the current filing fee for a Tentative Tract Map). This process would require a public hearing before the reviewing authority, which in this case is City Council since they originally took final action on the tract map. If you have authority to process the amendment differently the City would be happy to consider this information.) 73 o Whether there is any flexibility to recognize the recorded document and on-site modification as sufficient for purposes of the building permit, with a requirement that the tract map be “cleaned up” at a later date (e.g., with a future map action, consolidation, or other mechanism). (Please see response above) o Whether there is any way, given that I own both benefitted and burdened lots and the easement is private, to treat this differently than a typical public-interest easement change. (Please see response above)  If a tract map modification and City Council hearing are truly the only option: o Help us understand exactly what findings Council would need to make and what information staff would want from us to support those findings. (Here are the findings listed in SLOMC 16.14.130.F - 1. There are changes in circumstances which make any or all of the conditions of the parcel or final map no longer appropriate or necessary; and 2. The modifications do not impose any additional burden on the present fee owners of the property; and 3. The modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map; and 4. The city public works director and the community development director find that the map, as modified, conforms to the provisions of these regulations, the general plan and the Subdivision Map Act.) o Advise whether there is any opportunity to streamline timing (e.g., bundling with other items, consent calendar if appropriate) or otherwise reduce the processing burden. (A modification to the tract map would require a public hearing per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130 and cannot be considered as a consent item. Council agendas for public hearing items are currently full/closed until July 2026) o Let us know if there is any room to consider fee relief or reduction in light of the narrow, private nature of the change and the fact that the same owner controls both lots. (Staff does not have the authority to waive or modify fees)  Coordinate a short meeting to align on a path forward o I would really appreciate a brief call or Teams/Zoom meeting with you (and Gabriel/Melissa if appropriate) so we can walk through the situation once more, confirm the constraints, and leave with a clear, mutually agreed- upon roadmap. (Staff is happy to meet should you have further questions) My goal here is to be a good partner to the City, respect the Subdivision Map Act and local code, and at the same time avoid unnecessary process and expense on a small, private easement adjustment. I am genuinely looking for an advocate within the City who can help us make this process more amenable and proportional to the actual issue at hand. If you’re willing to help us chart that path, I would be very grateful. Please let me know if you’re available for a quick meeting early next week, or if there is any additional information I can provide that would assist you in evaluating alternatives. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 9:22 AM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; 'Donna Lewis' 74 <donna.lewis@rate.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Good Morning Tyler, I am formally requesting an in person meeting to review these circumstances with you and the current owner of this property. They have been more than patient. This has been an arduous and terribly long process. We were given approvals through a detailed and lengthy ARC process, spent tens of thousands of dollars perfecting these plans and have been on stuck hold for months. We need to coordinate a path forward with you that allows this project to proceed while whatever administrative process required is completed. Please advise of your earliest availability. Thank you in advance for your response. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, 75 Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. 76 For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 77 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, 78 Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. 79 The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 80 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Friday, November 14, 2025 2:20 PM To:Donna Lewis Cc:Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com); Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) Subject:RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Donna, We updated the owner information in our system to show you and Kevin as the property owners. Vellum only paid the initial building permit intake fee of $7,777. Going forward we will only charge for the building permit review time on an hourly staff time basis. Please let us know when you resubmit so we can update our system with the new architect information. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 1:39 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) < Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Tyler…just one more question. Can you let us know if any fees have been paid at all by Vellum? If so, what fees have been paid and what is left to pay? We are going to move forward with another architect and builder at this point so need to get our ducks in a row. Thanks. BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. 81 Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 Email Me Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. From: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:42 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Thank you again for your time Tyler. Based on our discussion, is it possible to change the lot owner in your system to Kevin & Donna Lewis? Paul is not the owner of the lot. We’d like this cleaned up in case we do decide to proceed with another architect and builder. Thanks. BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. 82 Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 Email Me Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:14 AM To: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement fyi From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 9:35 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I was able to connect with Gabriel and the City Attorney’s Office regarding the process to amend the utility easement from 15’ to 10’ along the rear of Lot 24. This amendment would require a modification to the tract map per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. The planning application fee for a modification is $8,633.02 (25% of the current filing fee for a Tentative Tract Map). This process would require a public hearing before the reviewing authority, which in this case is City Council since they originally took final action on the tract map. 83 I have linked the Planning Application and checklist for your use. If you have authority to process the amendment differently the City would be happy to consider this information. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:53 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Tyler, I have requested a formal response from Mike Stanton. Nothing yet. Were you able to connect with Gabriel? Can we schedule a time to discuss and lay out a plan to make this process as simple as possible? It really seems arduous and has already cost the project several months. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM 84 To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 85 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 86 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. 87 Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 88 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 89 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Friday, November 14, 2025 11:14 AM To:donna.lewis@rate.com Subject:FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement fyi From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 9:35 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I was able to connect with Gabriel and the City Attorney’s Office regarding the process to amend the utility easement from 15’ to 10’ along the rear of Lot 24. This amendment would require a modification to the tract map per Govt Code 66472.1 and SLOMC 16.14.130. The planning application fee for a modification is $8,633.02 (25% of the current filing fee for a Tentative Tract Map). This process would require a public hearing before the reviewing authority, which in this case is City Council since they originally took final action on the tract map. I have linked the Planning Application and checklist for your use. If you have authority to process the amendment differently the City would be happy to consider this information. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:53 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Tyler, 90 I have requested a formal response from Mike Stanton. Nothing yet. Were you able to connect with Gabriel? Can we schedule a time to discuss and lay out a plan to make this process as simple as possible? It really seems arduous and has already cost the project several months. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 91 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not 92 seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 93 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, 94 Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. 95 The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 96 From:Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Sent:Friday, November 14, 2025 11:11 AM To:Corey, Tyler Cc:Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) Subject:RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Can we get on a Teams call maybe so I can add Kevin? I can send you a link now if you are available. BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Headshot Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 To help protect your priv Email Me To help protect your priv Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:08 AM To: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> 97 Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Donna, I am happy to jump on a call with you to discuss. I am available now until noon and later this afternoon. Let me know what works for you. Tyler From: Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 10:56 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Donna Lewis <Donna.Lewis@rate.com>; Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Tyler…to be clear, we are well aware that Paul is the one that has squarely held up this process. We’ve owned the lot since last March and expected construction per our contract with him to begin in the summer of 2024. And here we are. We’ve lit a pretty big fire under him given that two months ago he informed us that this issue was unresolved…up until that point, we haf no visibility into the process and didn’t understand why we weren’t moving forward as we were leaving that up to him. We do really want to fully understand options as soon as possible. If there isn’t a realistic path other than literally redesigning the lower portion of the home at this point, we are going to need to make tough decisions including parting ways with Paul. We really just need to understand what’s realistic and do not wish to drag this process on any further than need be. Looking forward to connecting as soon as possible. BEWARE OF CYBER-FRAUD Before wiring any funds, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions - and be very wary of any request to change wire instructions you already received, a Guaranteed Rate employee will never provide nor confirm wire instructions. Donna Lewis NMLS# 245945 Branch Manager/SVP of Mortgage Lending (805) 235-0463 (805) 335-8743 Email Me Visit My Website 1065 Higuera St. Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Mobile App | Agent Advantage 98 Equal Housing Lender | © 2025 Guaranteed Rate, Inc. D/B/A Rate | NMLS ID 2611 | NMLS Consumer Access | Licensing Information AZ - 1045594, CA - CA-DOC245945, HI - HI-245945, NV - 79288, NY - Licensed, OR - Licensed, TN - 245945, TX - Licensed, WA - MLO-245945 Please Note : We care about your security and privacy, Please don't include identifying information like account numbers, birth dates and social security numbers in emails to us. Call us instead for secure email options or send the information by fax or regular US mail. CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY NOTICE The contents of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and proprietary and also may be covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not an intended recipient, Please inform the sender of the transmission error and delete this message immediately without reading, disseminating, distributing or copying the contents. Guaranteed Rate makes no assurance that this e-mail and any attachments are free of viruses and other harmful code. Operating as Guaranteed Rate, Inc. in New York. Reverse Products not available in Massachusetts or New York. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. It has no affiliation with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US Department of Agriculture or any other government agency. From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 9:22 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Cc: Kevin Lewis (kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com) <kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com>; Donna Lewis <donna.lewis@rate.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Good Morning Tyler, I am formally requesting an in person meeting to review these circumstances with you and the current owner of this property. They have been more than patient. This has been an arduous and terribly long process. We were given approvals through a detailed and lengthy ARC process, spent tens of thousands of dollars perfecting these plans and have been on stuck hold for months. We need to coordinate a path forward with you that allows this project to proceed while whatever administrative process required is completed. Please advise of your earliest availability. Thank you in advance for your response. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:02 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, 99 Were you able to connect with Mike Stanton on authority to process the amendment without needing to go back to Council? That would be helpful. Thanks, Tyler From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 9:00 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hello Tyler, We desperately need to move this project forward. I am hoping to connect with you again today to discuss next steps. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 3:12 PM To: 'Corey, Tyler' <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> 100 Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 101 From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag 102 o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 103 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 134 From:ernie kim < Sent:Friday, November 14, 2025 9:26 AM To:Savage, Melissa Cc:kevin@centralcoastappraisalservices.com Subject:Re: Lot 24 Enclave (1424 Hansen) Easement Question Thanks for following up. On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:02 AM Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Ernie, I am emailing to follow up on the question about possibly cantilevering the second floor over the easement. This, unfortunately, would not be supportable. Both floors will need to be outside the easement unless the map is amended. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Of… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- Ernie Kim ( 1243 Monterey Street Suite 200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 144 From:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent:Thursday, November 13, 2025 4:49 PM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:FW: ENCLAVE Lot 24 – Request for Easement Realignment Consideration Email thread below. I told him on September 4th that their easiest path forward would be to eliminate the proposal to encroach into the easement area. Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent: Friday, September 26, 2025 4:23 PM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org>; Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Subject: RE: ENCLAVE Lot 24 – Request for Easement Realignment Consideration Hi Paul, I had it on my agenda to get back to you this week on this. I finally had a chance to confirm again with the City Attorney’s office that the request would have to be processed as a map modification. Revising the easement outside of the map revision does not vacate any rights created by the map. Also, some thoughts on the points below:  Common Ownership: I am the current owner of both Lot 22 (the benefited parcel) and Lot 24 (the burdened parcel). This eliminates any risk of harm to third-party rights since the easement remains entirely within parcels under common control. o While there may be common lot ownership now this is not a guarantee in perpetuity so the situation has to be treated in a manner that ensures that two different property owners do not have a future issue created due to decisions that are made at this time.  Private Easement Only: The easement in question is private in nature, with no public rights attached. The City’s interest is limited to ensuring utility functionality, which will be fully preserved. o While the easement ensures private utility access, the City is responsible for ensuring that the rights of the current, and any future, owner of Lot 22 are in accordance with the intent of the original subdivision map.  No Additional Burden: The proposed realignment maintains the same storm drain and sewer service to Lot 22, consistent with the Subdivision Map Act’s requirements that modifications not impose an additional burden on any fee owner. 145 o Reducing the easement width to 5’ instead of the 15’ shown on the map could present difficulties to the owner of Lot 22 if/when they need to maintain their private utility lines in the future. This, to me, constitutes an additional burden on that property owner.  Change in Circumstance: The easement was originally recorded to protect Lot 22’s utility access against Lot 24. Now that both lots are under single ownership, the necessity of the original alignment no longer exists. This qualifies as a material change in circumstance. o I disagree with this statement. The need to ensure that Lot 22 has access to storm and sewer mains through laterals run through these easements remains as the intent is to provide the services for Lot 22 through Lot 24 still. While the alignment configuration may change, this does not mean that the easement must change. The change in alignment is being led by the desire to develop a larger home on Lot 24 not be a technical need to re- align the laterals due to poor design, error in layout, etc.  Commitment to Future Enforceability: To ensure long-term protection, I am prepared to record a restrictive covenant or revised easement deed that explicitly benefits Lot 22, should the lots be separately conveyed in the future. o The recorded easement on the map accomplishes this same thing.  Engineering Intent Preserved: The realignment will maintain full functionality of the storm water and sewer systems while eliminating the current conflict with the building footprint on Lot 24. The engineering intent of the tract map conditions is preserved. o Again, see answer about potential increased burden on the owner of Lot 22 by reducing this easement area. Again, we recommend you revise the site design to work around the constraints on the lot, as created at time of subdivision. Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2025 8:15 AM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org>; Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Subject: RE: ENCLAVE Lot 24 – Request for Easement Realignment Consideration Gabriel, We are desperate to move forward with this project. Please revisit by email below and confirm. I respectfully request the City’s support in processing this as a private easement adjustment, rather than requiring a full tract map modification and City Council hearing. This approach maintains compliance with engineering standards, protects utility access, and avoids unnecessary delay and expense for what is fundamentally a private alignment correction. I would greatly appreciate your guidance on the most efficient path forward and would be happy to meet at your convenience to discuss next steps best regards, 146 Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Paul Abbott Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 4:51 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org>; Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Subject: RE: ENCLAVE Lot 24 – Request for Easement Realignment Consideration Thank you. I look forward to hearing from you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 4:25 PM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org>; Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Subject: RE: ENCLAVE Lot 24 – Request for Easement Realignment Consideration Hi Paul, Received. I will review in more detail soon and be in touch. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer 147 Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 1:45 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org>; Mike Stanton <mike@mbslandsurveys.com>; kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com Subject: ENCLAVE Lot 24 – Request for Easement Realignment Consideration Dear Gabriel, Thank you for your thoughtful response and for outlining the City’s position regarding the private storm drain and sewer easements on Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3. I would like to clarify several key points that I believe support a modification of the existing easement alignment without the need for a full map amendment and City Council action:  Common Ownership: I am the current owner of both Lot 22 (the benefited parcel) and Lot 24 (the burdened parcel). This eliminates any risk of harm to third-party rights since the easement remains entirely within parcels under common control.  Private Easement Only: The easement in question is private in nature, with no public rights attached. The City’s interest is limited to ensuring utility functionality, which will be fully preserved.  No Additional Burden: The proposed realignment maintains the same storm drain and sewer service to Lot 22, consistent with the Subdivision Map Act’s requirements that modifications not impose an additional burden on any fee owner.  Change in Circumstance: The easement was originally recorded to protect Lot 22’s utility access against Lot 24. Now that both lots are under single ownership, the necessity of the original alignment no longer exists. This qualifies as a material change in circumstance.  Commitment to Future Enforceability: To ensure long-term protection, I am prepared to record a restrictive covenant or revised easement deed that explicitly benefits Lot 22, should the lots be separately conveyed in the future.  Engineering Intent Preserved: The realignment will maintain full functionality of the storm water and sewer systems while eliminating the current conflict with the building footprint on Lot 24. The engineering intent of the tract map conditions is preserved. Given these factors, I respectfully request the City’s support in processing this as a private easement adjustment, rather than requiring a full tract map modification and City Council hearing. This approach maintains compliance with engineering standards, protects utility access, and avoids unnecessary delay and expense for what is fundamentally a private alignment correction. I would greatly appreciate your guidance on the most efficient path forward and would be happy to meet at your convenience to discuss next steps. best regards, Paul J. Abbott 148 o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:54 AM To: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Paul, I have included Melissa as lead reviewer to date on this project and Sherman as point of contact to date below for Vellum. Hoping that will keep all stakeholders in the loop on this project/effort. Feel free to include others as needed as I am not sure who else has been involved in this design to date. It is my understanding that the proposed project at Lot 24 of Tract 3063-3 is proposing to build a new SFR partially in the existing private storm drain and sewer easements that were recorded on Lot 24 in favor of Lot 22. The initial submittal for the building permit did not show all of these easements and Engineering asked for them to be shown. In the subsequent resubmittal it was determined that the proposed residence was in conflict with the easements and engineering commented that this was not acceptable. The options for this situation are: 1. Modify the site design to eliminate the conflict with the easement or, 2. Modify the easements (if possible and acceptable) to allow for the proposed site design. Please note that option 1 should be pursued in every situation unless technically infeasible as the recorded easements on the tract map are there for a reason and are known to the owner of the lot when it is purchased for development. For this specific situation, our recommendation, to keep this project moving as quickly as possible and without further delays, is that you modify the site design to eliminate any portion of the building being proposed in the easement area. The site does not seem to present any technical reason that this could not happen. The tract map for Tract 3063-3 was recorded in 2022. At that time, the lots and easements shown on the map were reviewed and vetted. It does not seem that the easement in question is overly restrictive or unnecessary based on how this area was laid out on the map. If we were discussing an easement on a map from 50 years ago there may be a change in condition or engineering standard that may warrant a modification to the easement but I simply do not see what justification there is for a modification to the easement 3 years after the map was recorded. While the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) does allow for a process of modifying a map after it is recorded, it specifically indicates that the agency must “find that there are changes in circumstances that make any or all of the conditions of the map no longer appropriate or necessary.” The SMA also requires that the agency determine that “the modifications do not impose any additional burden on the fee owners of the real property, and that the modifications do not alter any right, title, or interest in the real property reflected on the recorded map.” Again, staff does not believe these conditions exists so any application for modification to the map would likely not yield support from engineering staff. If you proceed with an application for modification to the map, you will be required to pay the appropriate fees for this application, and it would require action by the City Council. In the report for that action, it is unlikely that engineering staff could recommend the request, as discussed here. That is why my recommendation, to keep your project moving and save you time and cost is that you revise the site design to propose a new residence that is not in conflict with the existing easements on Lot 24. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 149 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:38 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Gabriel, Thanks for reaching out. I need some advice on how to move forward with accommodating a plan check the comment we have received on a modification of an easement. This comment has now caused months of delays. Please review email string below. I would like to schedule a time to review with you at your earliest opportunity. Please advise. Thank you. best regards, Paul J. Abbott o:805.784.0487 | c: 805.234.6233 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 paul@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 11:57 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Melissa, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me earlier today. As discussed, you mentioned that under the Subdivision Map Act, a public hearing is required prior to any modification of the recorded Tract Map—even if the change involves only a private easement. This clarification is helpful as we move forward with RRM Design Group’s proposed changes. However, I would like request for a confirmation particularly of the fact that the public does not have access on the private easement in question as this detail may be material to the City's review and public hearing. Having this clarified in writing would be greatly appreciated. 150 You also mentioned that your are going to share with us the next steps on the procedure of this by later today 9/3 or early tomorrow 9/4. Appreciate your support in helping us navigate this process and the compliance with the City's requirements. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8:32 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement Hi Sherman, Thank you for your email and call. The private easement(s) currently on the tract map number 3063-Phase 3 will remain in place until and unless the map is changed through a public process. Please let me know if you would like to set up a call or video meeting to discuss this further. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:35 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Fraser, Bridget <bfraser@slocity.org>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: ENCLAVE LOT 24: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024: Private Easement 151 Melissa Savage Engineer 1 Cc: Bridget Fraser Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMITTED PLAN SET PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 / ARC-0457-2024 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I hope you're having a great day. This is in response to your email dated August 20, 2025, regarding the City Attorney’s decision to decline the "recorded document - 2025017758" (please see attached copy for reference). This has been surveyed by the surveyor Michael Stanton and documented by the County Clerk-Recorder Elain Cano. The private easement is currently being modified on-site and will be resubmitted by RRM Design Group to be reflected appropriately on the map. Cc: Bridget Frazer – For your information, as you’ve reviewed some of our Enclave projects. We’re looking forward to an expedited permit approval and appreciate your continued assistance in this process. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 166 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Monday, October 27, 2025 9:11 AM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-007 RNEW Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-007_CTYSLO_RNEW.GML; 2025042902791-007_CTYSLO_RNEW.XML; 2025042902791-007.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 4246653 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 007 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2025042902791 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 006 SEQUENCE NO= 32202106 TRANSMISSION ID= 7 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-10-27T09:10:27-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-11-24T23:59:59-08:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= RNEW TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 167 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 173 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Monday, September 29, 2025 11:34 AM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-006 RNEW Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-006_CTYSLO_RNEW.GML; 2025042902791-006_CTYSLO_RNEW.XML; 2025042902791-006.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 4101660 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 006 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2025042902791 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 005 SEQUENCE NO= 31105266 TRANSMISSION ID= 27 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-09-29T11:33:16-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-10-27T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= RNEW TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 174 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 201 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Tuesday, September 2, 2025 12:36 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-005 RNEW Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-005_CTYSLO_RNEW.GML; 2025042902791-005_CTYSLO_RNEW.XML; 2025042902791-005.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 3963551 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 005 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2025042902791 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 004 SEQUENCE NO= 30042414 TRANSMISSION ID= 32 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-09-02T12:35:27-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-09-30T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= RNEW TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 202 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 205 From:Savage, Melissa Sent:Wednesday, August 20, 2025 11:48 AM To:Sherman Damuag Subject:Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Hi Sherman, I believe the public process is required because the easement is on a final map and is governed by the Subdivision Map Act. I did not receive a report from the City Attorney's office but this is the direction they gave. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up fo om: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 11:29 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Hi Melissa, This is a private easement. Do they have an explanation? Can we get a copy of the report? Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 206 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 11:19 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Hi Sherman, From what I understand now, the recorded document that was submitted showing a modification of the sewer and storm easement is invalid. Additionally, any modification to the easement that currently exists on the property would need to go through a public process including a public hearing to change the easement on the map. If this is something the applicant would like to do, I can look into what the steps are for the process. Please let me know how you would like to move forward. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 11:13 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Permit Number: BLDG-0438-2025 ENCLAVE LOT 24: 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa, I just wanted to follow up on the status of the City Attorney’s review of the recorded document we submitted. We’re eager to move forward and would appreciate any updates you can provide regarding the review timeline or any additional steps needed from our end. Thank you for your time and assistance. Please let me know if you need any further information. 207 Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2025 11:58 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Hi Sherman, You are welcome to resubmit while we wait for the City attorney's office. Many of the comments resolutions depend on the outcome, though, so that is something to consider. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2025 11:48 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Hi Melissa, Can we amend/revise and resubmit while waiting for the City Attorney's response? Are your corrections dependent on the City Attorney? Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag 208 o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 1:17 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Hi Sherman, The comments including "pending outcome" means we are waiting on the City attorney's office to review the document before we can evaluate those items. I included the rest of my comments in the meantime. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 12:45 PM To: EPL, Noreply <noreplye@slocity.org> Cc: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Hi SLO City / Mellissa Savage, In the comments, where is says, "Submitted document is under review" or "Comment remains pending outcome of recorded document review". Does this mean we have to wait for your feedback before we take action? Please clarify and advise on the next steps. Thank you. 209 Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: noreplye@slocity.org <noreplye@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 7:54 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Building Permit Application Requires Resubmittal Dear Applicant, Your building permit application BLDG-0438-2025 has been reviewed for code compliance and further information is required. Please review the attached report for items that need to be addressed. A response if required for all Mark-ups, Corrections, and Recommendations. Responses for each comment can be submitted online, or you may create a 210 comment response report that can be submitted as a PDF. Once you are ready, please resubmit all requested documents and responses by logging on to the Citizen Access portal at infoslo.slocity.org. Sincerely, SLO City Building and Safety Staff 211 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Friday, August 8, 2025 3:04 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-004 RNEW Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-004_CTYSLO_RNEW.GML; 2025042902791-004_CTYSLO_RNEW.XML; 2025042902791-004.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 3849047 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 004 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2025042902791 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 003 SEQUENCE NO= 29154807 TRANSMISSION ID= 18 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-08-08T15:03:37-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-09-05T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= RNEW TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 212 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 218 From:Savage, Melissa Sent:Friday, July 18, 2025 4:13 PM To:paul@vellumdesignbuild.com; Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com; Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com Subject:BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello, I am reviewing the recorded document with the City attorney's office to verify the easement will still benefit 1430 Hansen. I am questioning whether 1430 Hansen needs to be the grantee in this case because that property is the one with laterals crossing 1424 Hansen. Do you mind explaining to me your thought process behind including 1429 Parsons and not 1430 Hansen? Regardless, the adjusted easement will need to reflect the change in the existing "triangle" (Figure A) private sewer easement and encompass the proposed sewer lateral through its connection to the existing sewer lateral and to the property line (Figure B). Figure A: Figure B: 219 I will continue to work on the review in the meantime. Please reach out to me if you have any questions or would like me to review another draft of the easement agreement. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 249 From:Vanessa Rogers <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 16, 2025 10:41 AM To:Building Subject:City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - Corrections Attachments:451997.SLO3.pdf Please see the attached "Correction" letter with regard to the above listed project. Feel free to contact our office with any questions or concerns. Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 Letter of Transmittal 930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360 www.csgengr.com phone 1.888.794.2016 To:City of San Luis Obispo Date:July 16, 2025 Review No:3rd 919 Palm Street CSG No.:451997 San Luis Obispo, CA. 93401 Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 Attn:Building Department Job Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Status: Plan requires corrections. See attached list.Plan is ready for permit issuance for the following: Architectural Energy Structural CalGreen Mechanical Wildland Urban Interface Plumbing Certified CASp Electrical Other: We have reviewed the following documents (Digital): X Plans X Energy Compliance Documents X Structural Calculations CalGreen Checklist – Not Applicable X Geotechnical Report X Specifications X Geotechnical Review Letter Wildland Urban Interface X Truss Calculations CASp Documents Truss Review Letter Response to Comments X Special Inspection Form X Other: HVAC Report Special items to note: Plans have been stamped by CSG. Environmental Health Services approval required. Special Inspection is required. Structural Observation is required. X Valuation $525,000 Please collect a plan review fee for hour(s) of plan check. Amount:$ Remarks: From: Christine Uhalde (B) Ash Arya, P.E. (S) CSG Consultants 451997 Page | 1 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION Date:July 16, 2025 Phone: 1.888.794.2016 Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Email: planreview@csgengr.com Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW Please resubmit (3) complete sets of revised hardcopy plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit complete sets of revised digital plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. In addition to the below plan check comments, there may be additional comments from other departments and agencies having jurisdiction for this project (i.e. City of San Luis Obispo Planning, Public Works, Fire Prevention, etc.). PLAN CHECK COMMENTS The following comments remain outstanding from the previous plan review. Please provide response to the comments in bold below. 1. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit a complete set of plans and documents upon every resubmittal. Any missing plan sheets, missing stamps and/or signatures (where required) may delay the review process. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ 2. Submit written responses addressing each plan review comments below and a summary of changes for any additional modifications. In each response, refer to specific detail or sheet, or specific page of the supporting documents. Show compliance with all comments within the construction documents. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Structural Plan Check Comments by |Ash Arya, asha@csgengr.com| S1. Update the olde code reference in soil report to the latest cycle in accordance with CBC 2022. The Geotech consultant may state in their review letter that the recommendation in the old report complies with CBC 2022. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. on plans design criteria notes, in the provided report or the update is consistent with values used in retaining wall calculations. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. PC3. Confirm the foundation design parameters in calculations have been coordinated with the initial soil report. Verify friction per soil report for example Also see S2 and S3 below. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S2. Confirm the application of seismic component of lateral soil pressure on residence rtg walls concurrent with other load combos. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. PC3. Response states application of surcharge the comment however is looking for clarification on application of seismic component. See for instance page 20 of the initial soil report which requires application of additional 25 pcf for seismic. 451997 Page | 2 Confirm the foundation design parameters in calculations have been coordinated with the initial soil report. Verify friction per soil report for example. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S3. Confirm that footing size, rebar in the 11 ft rtg wall calculations are consistent with plans. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. in calculations is coordinated with updated report. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. PC3. Confirm the foundation design parameters in calculations have been coordinated with the initial soil report. Verify friction per soil report for example. Also see S1 and S2 above. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ (End of Building Comments) 259 From:Kelly Fickle <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent:Friday, July 11, 2025 11:20 AM To:Building Subject:City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - In Review Confirmation of Plan Check Submittal 7/11/2025 Our plan check office has processed your plan check for review. We will keep you informed by sending our correction letters, notification, and/or correspondence to you as we completed and process the reviews. Please attach this email to your plan check file for future references. Plan Check Name: New 3818st SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Plan Check # : 4501997 / BLDG-0438-2025 Items Received: 7/10/2025 Due Date: 7/17/2025 Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 260 From:Silva, Ilianna Sent:Thursday, July 10, 2025 8:14 AM To:centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com Subject:BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) V3 RESUBMITTAL Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hello, Please confirm you received the uploaded plans for the following project. Thank you. BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) V3 RESUBMITTAL Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 281 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Thursday, June 19, 2025 2:53 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-002 RNEW Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-002_CTYSLO_RNEW.GML; 2025042902791-002_CTYSLO_RNEW.XML; 2025042902791-002.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 3615789 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 002 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2025042902791 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 001 SEQUENCE NO= 27360365 TRANSMISSION ID= 9 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-06-19T14:52:25-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-07-17T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= RNEW TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 282 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 283 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Tuesday, May 27, 2025 4:48 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-001 RNEW Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-001_CTYSLO_RNEW.GML; 2025042902791-001_CTYSLO_RNEW.XML; 2025042902791-001.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 3507698 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 001 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2025042902791 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 000 SEQUENCE NO= 26512418 TRANSMISSION ID= 16 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-05-27T16:46:43-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-06-24T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= RNEW TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 284 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CTYSLO, PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 285 From:Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 13, 2025 1:46 PM To:Christine Uhalde; Building Cc:Paul Abbott Subject:Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Attachments:Outlook-Descriptio; Outlook-Descriptio Christine, Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. Noted on your clarification for the windows. For your records, we only received the City's Permit correction Report and nothing from CSG during 2 nd review. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Christine Uhalde <christineu@csgengr.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 1:36 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Building <building@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello, The window schedule changed at PC2 and the window in Bedroom 1 changed from W-18 (left) to W-16 (right). Please indicate how egress is met as it appears that Window Type E does not open based off the window types provided (indicated by dashed lines like Window type B for example). We did not locate the CSG transmittal letter in the 2nd review documents, please ensure that it is included for the next review. 286 you, Christine Uhalde Associate Plans Examiner I CSG Consultants, Inc. 930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360 www.csgengr.com chrstineu@csgengr.com 209.862.9511 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 12:57 PM To: Building <building@slocity.org>; Christine Uhalde <christineu@csgengr.com> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) 287 Hi Christine Uhalde, As we are addressing your comments and amending our drawings, I have some clarifications below. I believe we did respond to the previous comments initially sent by the city and we submitted separate response letters from Civil and Structural consultants. Do you want me to resend you a copy ? Also, these new civil and structural comments (from CSG) are currently being reviewed by our engineers for this resubmission. Which window are you referring to? W-18 or W-16? Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Building <building@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 8:51 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello, Please find the attached comment letters for this project. Please address corrections and provide responses with your re-submittal. Thank you! Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II 288 Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 291 From:Savage, Melissa Sent:Friday, May 9, 2025 3:59 PM To:Sherman Damuag Subject:RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 You’re welcome! I will try to be clearer in my comments moving forward. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 3:11 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Thank you for your effort in making this clear. Appreciate it. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 292 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 2:58 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Hi Sherman, The intent of my comment is to have the plan notes match the verbiage of our standard notes. The order is not important and the other comments should still be included. The following are the requested changes to the notes on plans: Plans note “B” states: Contact Public Works inspection hotline at 781-7544 with at least 48 our notice for any required encroachment permit inspection or final inspection. It should state: Contact the Public Works inspection hotline at 781-7554 with at least a 48-hour notice prior to starting work in the right-of-way and for any required encroachment permit inspection or final inspection. Plans note “D” states: The Public Works improvement shall be substantially complete to the satisfaction of the Public Works Dept. prior to final inspection approvals and/or occupancy of any building. It should state: The public improvements shall be substantially complete to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director prior to final inspection approvals and/or occupancy of any building. I typed the differences in red for clarification purposes in this email. They do not need to be red on the plans. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 2:42 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 293 Hi Melissa, I'm currently reviewing your corrections report. It would be great if there are redlines on the plans for all the corrections. However, here is my clarification below: I have rearranged the "Public Works Notes" as per your list from "a to d", which is reflected on my notes as "b to e". Did you mean I shall delete other items not in your list? 294 Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 295 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 7:46 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Good morning Sherman, Unfortunately, the redline plan set is too large to send as an attachment. I have attached a selection of 7 pages that include my redlines. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 9:54 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org>; Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Good morning Melissa Savage, In your Permit Corrections Report, there are items particularly #23 that is referring to the redline. However, we did not receive the report together with the "redlined" Permit Correction Set. I also couldn't find it in the portal to download. Do you mind emailing a copy to us, it would be great to visually see how we can translate the corrections properly. Thank you. Regards, Sherman Damuag 296 o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 3:55 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Hi Melissa, Thank you so much for confirming. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 3:45 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Hi Sherman, Thank you for reaching out. We will not require the flared sides for the driveway approach as long as ADA compliance is maintained. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. Thank you, 297 Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 3:09 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. April 04, 2025 MELISSA SAVAGE SLO Building and Safety Department City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMIT CORRECTION RESPONSES PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I am writing in reference to the Permit Correction Report, specifically item #13, which requests the inclusion of new ADA- compliant driveway approaches with flared sides, in accordance with city standard #2116. Upon reviewing the requirements and the context of the project, I would like to respectfully request a waiver for this correction item. The neighborhood in question, as indicated in Tract 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans, has a rolled curb design. According to the ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010), the inclusion of flared sides is not mandatory when the driveway is adjacent to grass. The purpose of the flared sides is primarily to protect pedestrians from stumbling into the ramp due to the corners and the drop in level. However, with the presence of an ample walkway, this hazard is mitigated. Considering the rolled curb design and the context provided by the surrounding landscape, we believe that the flare ends are not necessary for pedestrian safety in this particular case. The current setup complies with the intent of ADA accessibility and ensures a safe environment for all users. We would greatly appreciate your kind consideration of this request to waive the correction item regarding the flared sides. Should you need any additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to reach out. 298 Thank you for your understanding and attention to this matter. See attached explanation. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 299 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 308 From:noreply@slocity.org Sent:Friday, May 9, 2025 2:08 PM To:sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com Cc:Recycle Right Subject:Recycling Plan 1424 Hansen Lane, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attachments:Construction and Demolition Recycling and Waste Pl.pdf Thank you for submitting your Construction & Demolition Recycling and Waste Management Plan. Please upload the attached Recycle Plan PDF to your online permit application (if applying for a permit online). If you already have an active permit and did not apply for a permit online, then a copy of your Recycle Plan PDF has already been sent to our building department to route to our department for review. Recycle Plan Final Approval Please note if “Recycling Approval” is listed under “Department Finals” on your printed permit card, then you must follow the instructions outlined in Step Two of the Construction and Demolition Recycling and Waste Management Plan. Click here for more information. Recycle Right Solid Waste and Recycling Division Public Utilities 879 Morro, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E RecycleRight@slocity.org T 805.781.7215 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Construction and Demolition Recycling and Waste Plan Please read this form carefully. The goal is to clearly document and create a plan to recycle a minimum of 65% of construction and demolition materials for permits after January 1, 2017, per Title 24 Chapter 11 of the Green Building Code. This form must be filled out in its entirety. For questions, email RecycleRight@slocity.org or call (805) 781-7215. Step 1: Complete Recycling Form Project Type * Residential Commercial Project Category * Demolition New Construction Addition Remodel/Tenant Improvement Project Site Address * 1424 Hansen Lane, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Project Description * New Single-Family Residence Estimated Project Cost * 525000 New Conditioned Square Footage * 3819 Estimated Fine for Failure to Comply * 10500 Project Contact Name * Sherman Damuag Contact Phone Number * 8057840487 Contact Email Address * sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com Type of Material to be Generated (check all that apply)* Mixed C&D Concrete/Asphalt Dirt Cardboard Metals Wood Other Once all Materials are checked, please enter weight estimates for each of these categories below. Estimated Quantity of Generated Materials (in tons) Mixed C&D Estimate * 10 Note: a tonnage estimate guide can be found on the City 's Construction and Demolition webpage. If you plan to reuse or donate materials, please explain here. How will you transport the materials?* Self-Haul Roll-Off Company Which IWMA-certified roll-off company will you be using?* Coastal Roll-Off Note: a list of IWMA-certified haulers, landfills, and transfer stations can be found on the City's Construction and Demolition webpage. ALL TONNAGE LEAVING PROJECT SITE MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR ON THIS FORM AND FAILURE TO RECYCLE AT LEAST 65% OF MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN A PENALTY OF 2% OF PROJECT VALUATION I understand that I must produce receipts listing tonnage of all materials leaving the project site, regardless of destination or method of removal. I certify that I will communicate this plan and requirements to all contractors and other personnel who may be involved in disposal of materials from this project and inform them that they must provide receipts listing the tonnage for all recycling and trash disposal. The final permit and all waste receipts must be presented prior to final sign off. I understand that failure to do so may incur a penalty of 2% of total project valuation and the City of San Luis Obispo makes the final determination of project cost and fine for failure to comply. Signature * Print Name * Sherman Damuag Date * 2025-05-09 Step 2: Upon Completion of Project 1.  Gather receipts listing tonnage for all materials that left the project site or a roll-off diversion report from one of the listed IWMA-certified haulers. *Please note - receipts must list tonnage as recycled or disposed. Mixed recycling receipts qualify as 70% recycling and 30% trash.  2. Email all receipts to RecycleRight@slocity.org for approval before final inspection. Include permit number, receipts/diversion report, photos of donated items (if applicable). Please allow 1-3 business days for review. 3. If approved, you will receive an email confirmation. Questions? RecycleRight@slocity.org or (805) 781-7215 309 From:Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent:Friday, May 9, 2025 11:09 AM To:Silva, Ilianna Subject:Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Attachments:Outlook-Descriptio Thank you Illianna, I dont need the previous reslines. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Silva, Ilianna <ISilva@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 10:46 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello Sherman, I reached out to the reviewer, and they mentioned there where no mark ups on the second review. If you need clarification, you can reach out the reviewer individually. I do see there are mark-up from the first review, they might clarify just click and they will download. 310 Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Building Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 10:06 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello Sherman, Let me reach out to the reviewer and ill get back to you. Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 311 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 9:50 AM To: Building <building@slocity.org> Subject: Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello, I have downloaded the Project Plans as per your instructions in your last email below. But the drawing has no redlines from you. This is the screenshot regarding T1.1 Public Works Notes. There are no markup on this sheet and the whole set. 312 Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag 313 o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Building Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 8:26 AM To: Sherman Damuag Subject: RE: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello Sherman, You can download the mark ups on the plan on the portal. When you log in go to attachments, click on the plans to download the plans and those will have the mark ups. Let me know if you have any questions. 314 Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org 315 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 5:04 PM To: Building <building@slocity.org> Subject: Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hi Sir/Madam, Thank you for sending us the comment letters. Appreciate if you the some mark-up on the plans to help us address the corrections visually if you have. Looking forward to your response. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Building <building@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 8:51 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello, Please find the attached comment letters for this project. Please address corrections and provide responses with your re-submittal. Thank you! Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 330 From:Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent:Friday, May 9, 2025 9:05 AM To:Building Subject:Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Attachments:Outlook-Descriptio Thank you. Appreciate it. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Building <building@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 8:26 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello Sherman, You can download the mark ups on the plan on the portal. When you log in go to attachments, click on the plans to download the plans and those will have the mark ups. Let me know if you have any questions. 331 Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org 332 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 5:04 PM To: Building <building@slocity.org> Subject: Re: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hi Sir/Madam, Thank you for sending us the comment letters. Appreciate if you the some mark-up on the plans to help us address the corrections visually if you have. Looking forward to your response. Thanks & regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Building <building@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 8:51 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Hello, Please find the attached comment letters for this project. Please address corrections and provide responses with your re-submittal. Thank you! Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 333 From:Building Sent:Thursday, May 8, 2025 8:51 AM To:Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com Subject:BLDG-0438-2025 (1424 Hansen Ln) Attachments:Permit Corrections Report.pdf; BLDG-0438-2025_CSG_BLDG_REVIEW_V2.pdf Hello, Please find the attached comment letters for this project. Please address corrections and provide responses with your re-submittal. Thank you! Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Letter of Transmittal 930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360 www.csgengr.com phone 1.888.794.2016 To:City of San Luis Obispo Date:May 5, 2025 Review No:2nd 919 Palm Street CSG No.:451997 San Luis Obispo, CA. 93401 Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 Attn:Building Department Job Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Status: Plan requires corrections. See attached list.Plan is ready for permit issuance for the following: Architectural Energy Structural CalGreen Mechanical Wildland Urban Interface Plumbing Certified CASp Electrical Other: We have reviewed the following documents (Digital): X Plans X Energy Compliance Documents X Structural Calculations CalGreen Checklist – Not Applicable X Geotechnical Report X Specifications X Geotechnical Review Letter Wildland Urban Interface X Truss Calculations CASp Documents Truss Review Letter Response to Comments X Special Inspection Form X Other: HVAC Report Special items to note: Plans have been stamped by CSG. Environmental Health Services approval required. Special Inspection is required. Structural Observation is required. X Valuation $525,000 Please collect a plan review fee for hour(s) of plan check. Amount:$ Remarks: From: Christine Uhalde (B) Ash Arya, P.E. (S) CSG Consultants 451997 Page | 1 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION Date:May 5, 2025 Phone: 1.888.794.2016 Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Email: planreview@csgengr.com Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW Please resubmit (3) complete sets of revised hardcopy plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit complete sets of revised digital plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. In addition to the below plan check comments, there may be additional comments from other departments and agencies having jurisdiction for this project (i.e. City of San Luis Obispo Planning, Public Works, Fire Prevention, etc.). PLAN CHECK COMMENTS The following comments remain outstanding from the previous plan review. Please provide response to the comments in bold below. 1. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit a complete set of plans and documents upon every resubmittal. Any missing plan sheets, missing stamps and/or signatures (where required) may delay the review process. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ 2. Submit written responses addressing each plan review comments below and a summary of changes for any additional modifications. In each response, refer to specific detail or sheet, or specific page of the supporting documents. Show compliance with all comments within the construction documents. PC2: Written responses addressing CSG corrections were not found, please submit responses addressing each remaining plan review comment for the next plan check. Structural plan check was not performed due to lack of responses. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Architectural Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| A4. A2.1, A2.2: The energy documents indicate R-21 on exterior walls; however, the “Wall Legends” indicate R-19, please revise accordingly. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. See wall legend below. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ 451997 Page | 2 A5. A2.2: Please call out Keynotes 1 & 2 to graphically identify the bathroom that will demonstrate compliance with aging-in-place. At least one bathroom on the entry level shall be provided with aging-in-place requirements. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A6. A2.5: Guards and rails shall be required when the clearance between the appliance and a roof edge or open end of an equipment platform is less than 6 feet. Please provide the dimensions between the heat pumps and the roof edge. If less than 6 feet, provide a guard or rail per CMC 303.8.4.1. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A7. A4.3: Keynote 16 references detail 34/A7.3; however, a corresponding detail was not found. Please revise accordingly. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A9. A4.4: The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom rail of guard, shall not allow passage of a sphere 6” in diameter. Please provide a corresponding note to ensure the new stairs demonstrate compliance. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A10. A6.1: To accomplish the intent of aging-in- place, please revise door D-21 to have a net clear opening of not less than 32 inches (a 2’10 or 3’ door accomplishes this) per CRC R327.1.2. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A11. A6.1: Please indicate that Door Note #9 applies to door D-22 for safety and clarity. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A12. A6.1: Bedroom 1 does not meet egress requirements. W-18 appears to be a Type A window with no openings. Please provide an emergency rescue and escape opening in the bedroom per CRC R310.2. Ensure the clear opening area is not less than 5.7 sf. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Please indicate how window W-16 meets egress requirements. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A13. A6.1: The following errors were found in the window schedule: - The window schedule indicates that W-05 and W-22 meets egress. These windows are 3x2 and do not meet egress, please remove the egress indication. - Window W-06 has an egress indication; however, it is a fixed glass window. Please clarify and revise accordingly. To meet egress requirements for bedroom 4, this window cannot be fixed glass. - Windows W-02, W-03, W-04 indicate Type A which is fixed glass; however, the style shows tilt/turn. Please revise the Type # to be consistent with the Window Types provided. To meet egress for bedroom 2, fixed glass cannot be used for all 3 windows. - Windows W-09, W-11, W-12, W-13, W-28, W-30 indicates style B (tilt turn) however, the window style indicates fixed glass. Please revise accordingly. - Windows W-14, W-17 and W-24 indicates style A (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. - Windows W-21 and W-22 indicate Type D (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. PC2: Several issues remain in the window schedule. Please verify all types, sash operations, egress notations 451997 Page | 3 and ensure consistency for the next review. -Please clarify if Window Type A is a tilt/turn window or fixed. -Window W-04 and W-20 do not meet egress. Please remove the notation. -Window W-05 sash operation indicates fixed glass and does not meet egress. Please revise accordingly. -Window W-07, W-26, W-28 indicates Type B (tilt turn); however, the sash operation indicates fixed glass. -Window W-08, W-09, W-10 indicate fixed glass, all 3 windows in the office cannot be fixed glass to meet egress requirements. -Window W-11 indicates Type B (tilt turn); however, the sash operation indicates fixed glass. -Windows W-12 style A (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. -Window-21, W-22: Please revise accordingly. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A14. A6.1: Please revise Door Notes #9 to reflect the 2022 governing code. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. See note #9 below. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Structural Plan Check Comments by |Ash Arya, asha@csgengr.com| S1. Update the olde code reference in soil report to the latest cycle in accordance with CBC 2022. The Geotech consultant may state in their review letter that the recommendation in the old report complies with CBC 2022. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. on plans design criteria notes, in the provided report or the update is consistent with values used in retaining wall calculations. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S2. Confirm the application of seismic component of lateral soil pressure on residence rtg walls concurrent with other load combos. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S3. Confirm that footing size, rebar in the 11 ft rtg wall calculations are consistent with plans. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. in calculations is coordinated with updated report. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S4. Confirm the 2J2.LC1 and RJ1.LC1 per vertical calculations key plans are consistent with plans sheets S-201 and S- 202. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. 451997 Page | 4 Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Mechanical Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| M1. A2.4: Please clarify the location of FAU #2. Ensure the distance from the attic access to the equipment shall not exceed 20 feet measured along the centerline of the passageway per CMC 304.4. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Electrical Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| E1. A6.2: Please show a smoke alarm in bedroom 3 and bedroom 4. Additionally, a smoke and carbon monoxide alarm shall be installed directly outside the bedrooms per CRC R314.3. and CRC R315.3. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E2. A6.2: Please show the required receptacle outlet in the hallway in accordance with CEC Article 210.52(H). PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E3. A6.2: Bedroom 2 is mislabeled Bedroom 4. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E4. A6.3: All 125-volt through 250-volt receptacles in the laundry room shall be GFCI-protected outlets per CEC 210.8(A). PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E5. A6.3: Please indicate battery backup electrical for the proposed automatic garage door openers per the requirements of CRC section R309.4. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E6. A6.3: Per R327.1.2 electrical receptacle outlets to be used by occupants shall be located no more than 48” measured from the top of the outlet box and not less than 15” measured from the bottom of the outlet box above the finish floor. Please add a corresponding note to the plans. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Energy Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| EN1. T1.2: The proposed dwelling has gas appliances. Please revise the Fuel Type on the energy report from “all electric” to “natural gas”. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ (End of Building Comments) PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PARCEL:004-719-024PERMIT ADDRESS:1424 Hansen Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 APPLICATION DATE:02/19/2025 EXPIRATION DATE: SQUARE FEET: 4,584.00 VALUATION:$525,000.00 DESCRIPTION:NEW 3,818.7 SQ.FT. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH 4 BEDROOMS, 4 BATHROOMS, AN ATTACHED 765.2 SQ.FT. 2-CAR GARAGE, 367.3 SQ.FT. COVERED PATIO, AND 367.3 SQ.FT. ROOF DECK ON THE UPPER FLOOR. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE 136 LINEAR FEET OF RETAINING WALL. CONTACTS NAME COMPANY ADDRESS Applicant Sherman Damuag Vellum Design & Build 3590 Broad Street, Suite 130 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Other Permits Vellum VELLUM, INC. Jamie Hess Vellum Design + Build 3590 Broad St, Suite 130 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Jamie Hess Vellum Design + Build 3590 Broad St San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Owner Paul Abbott 3590 Broad St, 130 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (R) Single Family REVIEW ITEM STATUS REVIEWER Addressing v.1 Vanessa Nichols Ph: 8057817588 email: vnichols@slocity.org Ready for Action General - Addressing Building (Consultant) v.1 Vanessa Nichols Ph: 8057817588 email: vnichols@slocity.org Needs Resubmit Building (Consultant) v.2 Vanessa Nichols Ph: 8057817588 email: vnichols@slocity.org Needs Resubmit Fees v.1 Vanessa Nichols Ph: 8057817588 email: vnichols@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Fees Correction: Administration - Vanessa Nichols (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: Vanessa Nichols vnichols@slocity.org 805-781-7588 Correction: Administration - Vanessa Nichols (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: #1 Please note the water meter as "New" in Water Key Note #2, Sheet C4.0. Correction: Administration - Vanessa Nichols (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: #2 Final fees pending response to comments and other department reviews. Fees v.2 Vanessa Nichols Ph: 8057817588 email: vnichols@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Fees Correction: Administration - Vanessa Nichols (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: Vanessa Nichols vnichols@slocity.org 805-781-7588 Correction: Administration - Vanessa Nichols (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: #1 Please note the water meter as "New" in Water Key Note #2, Sheet C4.0. Correction: Administration - Vanessa Nichols (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: #2 Final fees pending other department reviews. No action required. Correction: Administration - Vanessa Nichols (5/8/25) - Not Resolved Comments: #3 Please added the project address to all the plan sheets title block. Planning v.1 Walter Oetzell Ph: (805) 781-7593 email: woetzell@slocity.org Ready for Action General - Planning Private Sewer Lateral v.1 Not Required Private Sewer Lateral Inspection requirements (per Muni Code section 13.08.395) Public Works Permit Review v.1 Melissa Savage email: msavage@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Public Works Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 0)Melissa Savage msavage@slocity.org (805) 781-7206 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 1)On the coversheet, please reference the City permit/application numbers associated with this project for reference: Page 1 of 6City of San Luis ObispoMay 08, 2025 PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) ARCH-0457-2024 Architectural Review – Lots 23, 24 & 34 Enclave at Righetti single family dwellings FMAP-1955-2018 Tract 3063 Phase 3 - On-Site & Improvement Plans & revisions Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 2)Verify that the following Public Works Notes are included (or revised) on the cover sheet of the building plans: a.All work located within the public right-of-way or within the jurisdiction of the Utilities and Public Works Departments shall comply with the most current edition of the Engineering Standards and Standard Specifications dated August 2020. b.Contact the Public Works inspection hotline at 781-7554 with at least a 48-hour notice prior to starting work in the right-of-way and for any required encroachment permit inspection or final inspection. c.The public improvements shall be substantially complete to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director prior to final inspection approvals and/or occupancy of any building. d.Any existing survey monuments shall be protected in place or shall be tied out by a licensed land surveyor prior to disturbance and then replaced prior to occupancy in accordance with Section 8771 of the California Business and Professions Code. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 3)Provide a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP) in the format provided by the Building Division for minor projects less than 1 acre. Contact the Building Division at (805) 781-7180 for questions on any additional plan requirements and for a copy of the form. Otherwise, the form may be found at http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=7147 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 4)Provide bearings and distances for all property lines in accordance with the Tract 3063 Phase 3 map. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 5)Please refer to the Tract 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans. Tract plans indicate wrought iron boundary fencing and interior privacy fencing are to be installed by homebuilder. Clarify locations and types of fencing in this plan set. Clarify and coordinate locations and types of fencing on the Grading and Arch plans. Verify which fence details are used where. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 6)Show pad elevations on the grading plan for lot 24 per tract 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 7)Show and label all existing easements on plans. Include the private sewer easement on the northeastern corner of the property per Tract Map No. 3063 Phase 3. Show proposed building outside of all easements. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 8)Show on plans the existing stormwater and sanitary sewer mains and laterals serving lots 24 and 22 per 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans. Include invert elevations. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 9)If existing utilities are proposed to be moved, show on plans as proposed utility locations and clarify who is proposing to move or relocate the existing utilities. Provide invert elevations, and horizontal and vertical controls for proposed utilities. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 10)Plans show a proposed retaining wall within the private storm drain and sewer easement at the northeast corner of the property. Revise the retaining wall to be outside of the easement or provide details showing how existing utilities will remain accessible to the neighboring property (lot 22). Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 11)Plans show a proposed retaining wall within the 14’ public utility and public pedestrian access easement on the southwestern edge of the property. Show the retaining wall outside of the easement. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 12)Verify that the retaining wall footing/heel (and/or the 12” wide gravel drains) based on detail 2/C6.0 does not cross over the property line on the easterly side of the property. Show the dimension of the wall to the property line. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 13)Show and label new ADA compliant driveway approach. See city standard #2116 for reference. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 14)Per stormwater control plan for the tract, roof drains are to be disconnected and drain in a non-erosive manner to vegetated areas. Revise compliance strategy if roof drains are to be hard tied into storm drains as proposed in detail 7 on sheet C6.0 and note 4 on sheet C4.0. Complete and submit the PCR checklist available at the following link: http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=5190 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 15)Provide a Stormwater Compliance/Special Inspection Block on the title sheet that identifies Performance Requirement (PR) and Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) used for compliance consistent with plans. Fill in the blanks with the measure used for compliance such as, disconnecting roof drains, etc. For PR1 projects use the following block. Insert on the title Sheet T1.1: (Also verify method of compliance agrees with submitted SWCP which states compliance via “directing roof run off to vegetated areas.”) STORMWATER COMPLIANCE SUMMARY: The Project is subject to the following Performance Requirements (PR) of Regional Water Quality Control Board Resolution R3-2013-0032 “Post Construction Stormwater Management Requirements for Development Projects in the Central Coast Region”: ☒ PR 1 Site Design/Runoff Reduction through use of (fill in the blank). Sheet ______ Stormwater Control Plan by__________________ dated___________________ City Field Verification. Prior to final acceptance, contact the City for field verification of installed Structural Control Measures (SCMs) and/or other required elements as proposed in the project Stormwater Control Plan. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 16)Add note to plans: Stormwater and drainage system certification is required from the engineer of record prior to final inspection approvals. The engineer shall certify that the drainage and stormwater system components have been inspected and are in general Page 2 of 6City of San Luis ObispoMay 08, 2025 PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) conformance with the drainage report, system design, and the approved plans, including all final elevations, component sizing, level spreaders, drainage piping, inlets, weir elevations, and orifices. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 17)A CAL-OSHA permit is required for excavations or trenching greater than 5 feet in depth. A copy of the annual, provisional, or temporary permit shall be provided to the Building Division prior to building, utility, and/or grading permit issuance if applicable. CA Health and Safety Code Section 17922.5 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 18)Show the location of the existing street trees on the site plan for reference. Include the tree diameter, species, and show the tree canopy to scale for reference. Clarify whether the proposed construction, construction staging, scaffolding, etc. will require safety pruning of the existing tree. Note on the plans to contact the City Arborist at 781-7578 to review and approve any required or proposed pruning of street trees. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 19)Tree protection measures for existing street trees shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. The City Arborist shall review and approve the proposed tree protection measures to be incorporated into the building plans. Contact the City Arborist at (805) 781-7578 to schedule a site visit. Tentative plans shall be provided to the arborist for review either prior to or at the time of the field investigation. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 20)Please revise vicinity map on sheet T1.1 to better reflect project location. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 21)Revise sheets C3.0 and C4.0 to show proposed walkway to not overlapping with existing sidewalk. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 22)Show and label existing sidewalk underdrains. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 23)Provide reference(s) in place of “by others” (typical). See sheet C4.0 sanitary sewer key note 4, sheet C5.0 redline, and sheet C6.0 detail 2 for examples. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 24)Show existing utility locations and elevations on sheet RW1.0. Include sanitary sewer and storm drain mains and laterals, if applicable. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 25)Show backflow preventer location on plans. Provide reference to standard 6550 on sheet L3.0. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 26)Show distance from footing to property line on detail 16, sheet S-400. Public Works Permit Review v.2 Melissa Savage email: msavage@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Public Works Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 0)Melissa Savage msavage@slocity.org (805) 781-7206 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 1)On the coversheet, please reference the City permit/application numbers associated with this project for reference: ARCH-0457-2024 Architectural Review – Lots 23, 24 & 34 Enclave at Righetti single family dwellings FMAP-1955-2018 Tract 3063 Phase 3 - On-Site & Improvement Plans & revisions Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 2)Revise sheet T1.1 "Public Works Notes" B and D. They should match verbatim notes b and c respectively, as noted below. Please contact me if you have any questions (Melissa Savage 5/1/25). Verify that the following Public Works Notes are included (or revised) on the cover sheet of the building plans: a.All work located within the public right-of-way or within the jurisdiction of the Utilities and Public Works Departments shall comply with the most current edition of the Engineering Standards and Standard Specifications dated August 2020. b.Contact the Public Works inspection hotline at 781-7554 with at least a 48-hour notice prior to starting work in the right-of-way and for any required encroachment permit inspection or final inspection. c.The public improvements shall be substantially complete to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director prior to final inspection approvals and/or occupancy of any building. d.Any existing survey monuments shall be protected in place or shall be tied out by a licensed land surveyor prior to disturbance and then replaced prior to occupancy in accordance with Section 8771 of the California Business and Professions Code. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 3)Provide a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP) in the format provided by the Building Division for minor projects less than 1 acre. Contact the Building Division at (805) 781-7180 for questions on any additional plan requirements and for a copy of the form. Otherwise, the form may be found at http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=7147 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 4)Provide bearings and distances for all property lines in accordance with the Tract 3063 Phase 3 map. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 5)Please refer to the Tract 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans. Tract plans indicate wrought iron boundary fencing and interior privacy fencing are to be installed by homebuilder. Clarify locations and types of fencing in this plan set. Clarify and coordinate locations and types of fencing on the Grading and Arch plans. Verify which fence details are used where. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 6)Show pad elevations on the grading plan for lot 24 per tract 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 7)Comment remains. Proposed buildings are still shown within existing easements. Prior to building permit issuance, either: a. show Page 3 of 6City of San Luis ObispoMay 08, 2025 PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) on plans proposed buildings removed from existing easements, or b. provide recorded documents abandoning existing private storm drain and sewer easement and adding a modified private storm drain and sewer easement with all buildings shown outside of new or modified easements. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) Show and label all existing easements on plans. Include the private sewer easement on the northeastern corner of the property per Tract Map No. 3063 Phase 3. Show proposed building outside of all easements. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 8)Show invert elevations for the existing stormwater and sanitary sewer mains and laterals. If removal of existing utilities is authorized, this comment may no longer apply. Prior to building permit issuance, provide appropriate authorization for removal of existing utilities. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) Show on plans the existing stormwater and sanitary sewer mains and laterals serving lots 24 and 22 per 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans. Include invert elevations. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 9)If existing utilities are proposed to be moved, show on plans as proposed utility locations and clarify who is proposing to move or relocate the existing utilities. Provide invert elevations, and horizontal and vertical controls for proposed utilities. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 10)Comment remains. The retaining wall along the western edge of the property is shown within the existing private storm drain and sewer easements at the rear of the property, and in the PPAE, PSTE, PWE, and PUE at the front of the property. Show the retaining wall outside of all existing easements or provide recorded documents showing the removal or modification of easements. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) Plans show a proposed retaining wall within the private storm drain and sewer easement at the northeast corner of the property. Revise the retaining wall to be outside of the easement or provide details showing how existing utilities will remain accessible to the neighboring property (lot 22). Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 11)Plans show a proposed retaining wall within the 14’ public utility and public pedestrian access easement on the southwestern edge of the property. Show the retaining wall outside of the easement. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 12)Verify that the retaining wall footing/heel (and/or the 12” wide gravel drains) based on detail 2/C6.0 does not cross over the property line on the easterly side of the property. Show the dimension of the wall to the property line. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 13)Show and label new ADA compliant driveway approach. See city standard #2116 for reference. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 14)Per stormwater control plan for the tract, roof drains are to be disconnected and drain in a non-erosive manner to vegetated areas. Revise compliance strategy if roof drains are to be hard tied into storm drains as proposed in detail 7 on sheet C6.0 and note 4 on sheet C4.0. Complete and submit the PCR checklist available at the following link: http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=5190 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 15)Provide a Stormwater Compliance/Special Inspection Block on the title sheet that identifies Performance Requirement (PR) and Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) used for compliance consistent with plans. Fill in the blanks with the measure used for compliance such as, disconnecting roof drains, etc. For PR1 projects use the following block. Insert on the title Sheet T1.1: (Also verify method of compliance agrees with submitted SWCP which states compliance via “directing roof run off to vegetated areas.”) STORMWATER COMPLIANCE SUMMARY: The Project is subject to the following Performance Requirements (PR) of Regional Water Quality Control Board Resolution R3-2013-0032 “Post Construction Stormwater Management Requirements for Development Projects in the Central Coast Region”: ☒ PR 1 Site Design/Runoff Reduction through use of (fill in the blank). Sheet ______ Stormwater Control Plan by__________________ dated___________________ City Field Verification. Prior to final acceptance, contact the City for field verification of installed Structural Control Measures (SCMs) and/or other required elements as proposed in the project Stormwater Control Plan. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 16)Add note to plans: Stormwater and drainage system certification is required from the engineer of record prior to final inspection approvals. The engineer shall certify that the drainage and stormwater system components have been inspected and are in general conformance with the drainage report, system design, and the approved plans, including all final elevations, component sizing, level spreaders, drainage piping, inlets, weir elevations, and orifices. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 17)Comment remains. Provide a copy of the CAL-OSHA permit prior to building permit issuance. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) A CAL-OSHA permit is required for excavations or trenching greater than 5 feet in depth. A copy of the annual, provisional, or temporary permit shall be provided to the Building Division prior to building, utility, and/or grading permit issuance if applicable. CA Health and Safety Code Section 17922.5 Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 18)Show the location of the existing street trees on the site plan for reference. Include the tree diameter, species, and show the tree canopy to scale for reference. Clarify whether the proposed construction, construction staging, scaffolding, etc. will require safety pruning of the existing tree. Note on the plans to contact the City Arborist at 781-7578 to review and approve any required or proposed pruning of street trees. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 19)Tree protection measures for existing street trees shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. The City Arborist shall review and approve the proposed tree protection measures to be incorporated into the building plans. Contact the City Arborist at (805) 781-7578 to schedule a site visit. Tentative plans shall be provided to the arborist for review either prior to or at the time of the field investigation. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Page 4 of 6City of San Luis ObispoMay 08, 2025 PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) Comments: 20)Please revise vicinity map on sheet T1.1 to better reflect project location. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 21)Revise sheets C3.0 and C4.0 to show proposed walkway to not overlapping with existing sidewalk. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Resolved Comments: 22)Show and label existing sidewalk underdrains. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 23)Comment remains. Specify recorded document number and date for the easements “proposed to be abandoned by others” and easements revised “by others.” Provide specific references, including sheet and detail numbers, for all other notes and callouts currently stating “by others.” For examples, sheet C4.0 Sanitary Sewer Key Notes number 1 states “See plumbing plans by others…” and Water Key Notes number 1 states “see mechanical plans by others…” Please revise. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) Provide reference(s) in place of “by others” (typical). See sheet C4.0 sanitary sewer key note 4, sheet C5.0 redline, and sheet C6.0 detail 2 for examples. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 24)Comment remains. Show existing storm drain and sanitary sewer mains and laterals. If approved recorded documentation is provided that neighboring property owner authorizes moving mains and laterals, comment may no longer apply. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) Show existing utility locations and elevations on sheet RW1.0. Include sanitary sewer and storm drain mains and laterals, if applicable. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 25) Provide on sheet L2.0 reference to City standard 6550, sheet L3.0. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) Show backflow preventer location on plans. Provide reference to standard 6550 on sheet L3.0. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 26)Details 20 and 22 on sheet S-400 show no permeable material above drainage pipe and instead engineered compacted soil. City standard 5020 requires a 12” gravel layer around the drainage pipe. Clarify how wall drainage will occur and prevent surcharging. (Melissa Savage 5/7/25) Show distance from footing to property line on detail 16, sheet S-400. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (5/7/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 27)Revised plan submission shows proposed shared storm and sewer laterals connecting to existing private laterals on private property. If proposed utility locations remain as shown, the proposed new or modified private storm drain and sanitary sewer easement must be recorded and include all proposed laterals. As shown, a portion of the proposed sanitary sewer lateral is shown connecting to the existing lateral outside of the proposed easement. Additionally, if the existing private laterals or any portion thereof are proposed to remain, the recorded private storm drain and sanitary sewer easement document must also include the existing private laterals or portions to remain. Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (5/7/25) - Not Resolved Comments: 28)Show the proposed storm drain and sewer laterals with a minimum horizontal distance of 3’ between laterals. (Engineering Standard 6010) Recycling v.1 Rachelle Paris email: rparis@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Recycling Correction: Recycling - Rachelle Paris (3/12/25) - Not Resolved Comments: Please submit your project's Recycle Plan online at https://forms.slocity.org/Forms/recyclingplan Corrective Action: Rachelle Paris - RecycleRight@slocity.org Recycling v.2 Rachelle Paris email: rparis@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Recycling Correction: Recycling - Rachelle Paris (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: Please submit your project's Recycle Plan online at https://forms.slocity.org/Forms/recyclingplan Corrective Action: Rachelle Paris - RecycleRight@slocity.org Site Grading/PW v.1 Melissa Savage email: msavage@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Site Grading/PW Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: See Public Works Permit Review comments. Site Grading/PW v.2 Melissa Savage email: msavage@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Site Grading/PW Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: See Public Works Permit Review comments. Stormwater (Engineering-CDD) v.1 Melissa Savage email: msavage@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Stormwater/PW Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (3/24/25) - Not Resolved Comments: See Public Works Permit Review comments. Stormwater (Engineering-CDD) v.2 Melissa Savage email: msavage@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Stormwater/PW Correction: Engineering Standards Compliance - Melissa Savage (4/25/25) - Not Resolved Comments: See Public Works Permit Review comments. Utilities (Consultant) v.1 Geraldine Seng email: gseng@slocity.org Not Required Wastewater Offset v.1 Geraldine Seng email: gseng@slocity.org Not Required Wastewater Offset Water (Building) v.1 Vanessa Nichols Ph: 8057817588 email: vnichols@slocity.org Needs Resubmit General - Water Page 5 of 6City of San Luis ObispoMay 08, 2025 PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) Water (Building) v.2 Vanessa Nichols Ph: 8057817588 email: vnichols@slocity.org Ready for Action General - Water Page 6 of 6City of San Luis ObispoMay 08, 2025 351 From:Building <building@slocity.org> Sent:Tuesday, May 6, 2025 8:28 AM To:Vanessa Rogers Subject:RE: City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - Corrections Received, thank you! Erin Stanley Permit Technician I Community Development E EStanley@slocity.org T 805.781.7159 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Vanessa Rogers <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent: Monday, May 5, 2025 3:52 PM To: Building <building@slocity.org> Subject: City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - Corrections Please see the attached "Correction" letter with regard to the above listed project. Feel free to contact our office with any questions or concerns. Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 354 From:Vanessa Rogers <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent:Monday, May 5, 2025 3:52 PM To:Building Subject:City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - Corrections Attachments:451997.SLO2.pdf Please see the attached "Correction" letter with regard to the above listed project. Feel free to contact our office with any questions or concerns. Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 Letter of Transmittal 930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360 www.csgengr.com phone 1.888.794.2016 To:City of San Luis Obispo Date:May 5, 2025 Review No:2nd 919 Palm Street CSG No.:451997 San Luis Obispo, CA. 93401 Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 Attn:Building Department Job Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Status: Plan requires corrections. See attached list.Plan is ready for permit issuance for the following: Architectural Energy Structural CalGreen Mechanical Wildland Urban Interface Plumbing Certified CASp Electrical Other: We have reviewed the following documents (Digital): X Plans X Energy Compliance Documents X Structural Calculations CalGreen Checklist – Not Applicable X Geotechnical Report X Specifications X Geotechnical Review Letter Wildland Urban Interface X Truss Calculations CASp Documents Truss Review Letter Response to Comments X Special Inspection Form X Other: HVAC Report Special items to note: Plans have been stamped by CSG. Environmental Health Services approval required. Special Inspection is required. Structural Observation is required. X Valuation $525,000 Please collect a plan review fee for hour(s) of plan check. Amount:$ Remarks: From: Christine Uhalde (B) Ash Arya, P.E. (S) CSG Consultants 451997 Page | 1 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION Date:May 5, 2025 Phone: 1.888.794.2016 Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Email: planreview@csgengr.com Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW Please resubmit (3) complete sets of revised hardcopy plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit complete sets of revised digital plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. In addition to the below plan check comments, there may be additional comments from other departments and agencies having jurisdiction for this project (i.e. City of San Luis Obispo Planning, Public Works, Fire Prevention, etc.). PLAN CHECK COMMENTS The following comments remain outstanding from the previous plan review. Please provide response to the comments in bold below. 1. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit a complete set of plans and documents upon every resubmittal. Any missing plan sheets, missing stamps and/or signatures (where required) may delay the review process. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ 2. Submit written responses addressing each plan review comments below and a summary of changes for any additional modifications. In each response, refer to specific detail or sheet, or specific page of the supporting documents. Show compliance with all comments within the construction documents. PC2: Written responses addressing CSG corrections were not found, please submit responses addressing each remaining plan review comment for the next plan check. Structural plan check was not performed due to lack of responses. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Architectural Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| A4. A2.1, A2.2: The energy documents indicate R-21 on exterior walls; however, the “Wall Legends” indicate R-19, please revise accordingly. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. See wall legend below. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ 451997 Page | 2 A5. A2.2: Please call out Keynotes 1 & 2 to graphically identify the bathroom that will demonstrate compliance with aging-in-place. At least one bathroom on the entry level shall be provided with aging-in-place requirements. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A6. A2.5: Guards and rails shall be required when the clearance between the appliance and a roof edge or open end of an equipment platform is less than 6 feet. Please provide the dimensions between the heat pumps and the roof edge. If less than 6 feet, provide a guard or rail per CMC 303.8.4.1. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A7. A4.3: Keynote 16 references detail 34/A7.3; however, a corresponding detail was not found. Please revise accordingly. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A9. A4.4: The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom rail of guard, shall not allow passage of a sphere 6” in diameter. Please provide a corresponding note to ensure the new stairs demonstrate compliance. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A10. A6.1: To accomplish the intent of aging-in- place, please revise door D-21 to have a net clear opening of not less than 32 inches (a 2’10 or 3’ door accomplishes this) per CRC R327.1.2. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A11. A6.1: Please indicate that Door Note #9 applies to door D-22 for safety and clarity. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A12. A6.1: Bedroom 1 does not meet egress requirements. W-18 appears to be a Type A window with no openings. Please provide an emergency rescue and escape opening in the bedroom per CRC R310.2. Ensure the clear opening area is not less than 5.7 sf. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Please indicate how window W-16 meets egress requirements. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A13. A6.1: The following errors were found in the window schedule: - The window schedule indicates that W-05 and W-22 meets egress. These windows are 3x2 and do not meet egress, please remove the egress indication. - Window W-06 has an egress indication; however, it is a fixed glass window. Please clarify and revise accordingly. To meet egress requirements for bedroom 4, this window cannot be fixed glass. - Windows W-02, W-03, W-04 indicate Type A which is fixed glass; however, the style shows tilt/turn. Please revise the Type # to be consistent with the Window Types provided. To meet egress for bedroom 2, fixed glass cannot be used for all 3 windows. - Windows W-09, W-11, W-12, W-13, W-28, W-30 indicates style B (tilt turn) however, the window style indicates fixed glass. Please revise accordingly. - Windows W-14, W-17 and W-24 indicates style A (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. - Windows W-21 and W-22 indicate Type D (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. PC2: Several issues remain in the window schedule. Please verify all types, sash operations, egress notations 451997 Page | 3 and ensure consistency for the next review. -Please clarify if Window Type A is a tilt/turn window or fixed. -Window W-04 and W-20 do not meet egress. Please remove the notation. -Window W-05 sash operation indicates fixed glass and does not meet egress. Please revise accordingly. -Window W-07, W-26, W-28 indicates Type B (tilt turn); however, the sash operation indicates fixed glass. -Window W-08, W-09, W-10 indicate fixed glass, all 3 windows in the office cannot be fixed glass to meet egress requirements. -Window W-11 indicates Type B (tilt turn); however, the sash operation indicates fixed glass. -Windows W-12 style A (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. -Window-21, W-22: Please revise accordingly. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A14. A6.1: Please revise Door Notes #9 to reflect the 2022 governing code. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. See note #9 below. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Structural Plan Check Comments by |Ash Arya, asha@csgengr.com| S1. Update the olde code reference in soil report to the latest cycle in accordance with CBC 2022. The Geotech consultant may state in their review letter that the recommendation in the old report complies with CBC 2022. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. on plans design criteria notes, in the provided report or the update is consistent with values used in retaining wall calculations. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S2. Confirm the application of seismic component of lateral soil pressure on residence rtg walls concurrent with other load combos. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S3. Confirm that footing size, rebar in the 11 ft rtg wall calculations are consistent with plans. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. in calculations is coordinated with updated report. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S4. Confirm the 2J2.LC1 and RJ1.LC1 per vertical calculations key plans are consistent with plans sheets S-201 and S- 202. PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction. 451997 Page | 4 Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Mechanical Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| M1. A2.4: Please clarify the location of FAU #2. Ensure the distance from the attic access to the equipment shall not exceed 20 feet measured along the centerline of the passageway per CMC 304.4. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Electrical Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| E1. A6.2: Please show a smoke alarm in bedroom 3 and bedroom 4. Additionally, a smoke and carbon monoxide alarm shall be installed directly outside the bedrooms per CRC R314.3. and CRC R315.3. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E2. A6.2: Please show the required receptacle outlet in the hallway in accordance with CEC Article 210.52(H). PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E3. A6.2: Bedroom 2 is mislabeled Bedroom 4. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E4. A6.3: All 125-volt through 250-volt receptacles in the laundry room shall be GFCI-protected outlets per CEC 210.8(A). PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E5. A6.3: Please indicate battery backup electrical for the proposed automatic garage door openers per the requirements of CRC section R309.4. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E6. A6.3: Per R327.1.2 electrical receptacle outlets to be used by occupants shall be located no more than 48” measured from the top of the outlet box and not less than 15” measured from the bottom of the outlet box above the finish floor. Please add a corresponding note to the plans. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Energy Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| EN1. T1.2: The proposed dwelling has gas appliances. Please revise the Fuel Type on the energy report from “all electric” to “natural gas”. PC2: Comment remains outstanding. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ (End of Building Comments) 361 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Tuesday, April 29, 2025 3:16 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025042902791-000 Original Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025042902791-000_CTYSLO_Original.GML; 2025042902791-000_CTYSLO_Original.XML; 2025042902791-000.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 3384642 TICKET NO= 2025042902791 TICKET REVISION NO= 000 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= SEQUENCE NO= 25541797 TRANSMISSION ID= 16 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-04-29T15:15:18-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-05-01T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-05-27T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= Longer than 31 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= Original TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Grade/Level/Site Prep/Finish Work DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 11247 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= true PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 362 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CTYSLO, PGESLO, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 32922 NAME= Tami White COMPANY= Viola ConstrucƟon Inc. STREET ADDRESS= PO BOX 198 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93421 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-474-9745 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= violaconstrucƟoninc@gmail.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1424 Hansen Ln CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Box Springs Rd. STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= Enclave ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Tamera White ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057489086 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.255297 LONGITUDE= -120.631423 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Grading and onsite uƟliƟes TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 363 From:Kelly Fickle <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 8:49 AM To:Building Subject:City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - In Review Confirmation of Plan Check Submittal 4/28/2025 Our plan check office has processed your plan check for review. We will keep you informed by sending our correction letters, notification, and/or correspondence to you as we completed and process the reviews. Please attach this email to your plan check file for future references. Plan Check Name: New 3818st SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Plan Check # : 4501997 / BLDG-0438-2025 Items Received: 4/28/2025 Due Date: 5/5/2025 Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 364 From:Savage, Melissa Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 7:09 AM To:Sherman Damuag Cc:Paul Abbott; Jamie Hess Subject:RE: RESUBMITTED - BLDG-0438-2025: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 14 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Sherman, Thank you for letting me know about the resubmittal. I see the review in the queue and will let you know if I have any questions. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 11:30 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com>; Jamie Hess <Jamie@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RESUBMITTED - BLDG-0438-2025: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 14 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 April 25, 2025 MELISSA SAVAGE ENGINEER 1 Community Development City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMIT CORRECTION RESPONSES - RESUBMITTED PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 365 Hi Ms. Savage, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to inform your office that we have resubmitted the permit application via the portal today, April 25, 2025, for the above-mentioned project, in accordance with the plan check corrections provided. Here is the Transmittal List:  1 Building Submission Set - 2025.04.25-Enclave24-Bldg_Sub2  1 Architectural Plan Review Response Letter - 04.25.2025 Enclave L24-Plan Review Responses  1 Civil Plan Review Response Letter -Doc_Enclave Lot 24_Transmittal and Response Narrative  1 Civil SWCP Report - Doc_Enclave Lot 24_SWCP  1 Structural Plan Review Response Letter - 2025-04-23 FTF 24-529 Enclave Lot 24 Plan Check Response  1 Soil Revised Plan Review Letter - SL13552-1 Enclave Lot 24 Plan Review #4 revision 1 All these have been uploaded into the portal. To the best of my knowledge, the resubmitted permit set is now in order. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or require further clarification. I will be happy to assist in any way I can. I am looking forward to your positive response and sign-off. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 366 From:Building <building@slocity.org> Sent:Friday, April 25, 2025 12:44 PM To:centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com Subject:New resubmittal - documents receival confirmation Good afternoon, I just uploaded 7 documents to the portal for 1424 Hansen (BLDG-0438-2025). Can you please confirm you received them? We are requesting your team complete the building review. The due date has been set at 05/09/2025 for comment or approval. Please bill us hourly and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you, Erin Stanley Permit Technician I Community Development E EStanley@slocity.org T 805.781.7159 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 367 From:Savage, Melissa Sent:Tuesday, April 8, 2025 7:46 AM To:Sherman Damuag Subject:RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Attachments:2025-02-20-2025.02.20 Enclave Lot 24 - Permit Set_v1 (1) (1).pdf Good morning Sherman, Unfortunately, the redline plan set is too large to send as an attachment. I have attached a selection of 7 pages that include my redlines. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 9:54 AM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org>; Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Good morning Melissa Savage, In your Permit Corrections Report, there are items particularly #23 that is referring to the redline. However, we did not receive the report together with the "redlined" Permit Correction Set. I also couldn't find it in the portal to download. Do you mind emailing a copy to us, it would be great to visually see how we can translate the corrections properly. Thank you. Regards, Sherman Damuag 368 o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 3:55 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Hi Melissa, Thank you so much for confirming. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 3:45 PM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 Hi Sherman, 369 Thank you for reaching out. We will not require the flared sides for the driveway approach as long as ADA compliance is maintained. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. Thank you, Melissa Savage pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E msavage@slocity.org T 805.781.7206 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 3:09 PM To: Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) - ENCLAVE LOT 24 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. April 04, 2025 MELISSA SAVAGE SLO Building and Safety Department City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMIT CORRECTION RESPONSES PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Hi Melissa Savage, I am writing in reference to the Permit Correction Report, specifically item #13, which requests the inclusion of new ADA- compliant driveway approaches with flared sides, in accordance with city standard #2116. Upon reviewing the requirements and the context of the project, I would like to respectfully request a waiver for this correction item. The neighborhood in question, as indicated in Tract 3063 Phase 3 Improvement Plans, has a rolled curb design. According to the ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010), the inclusion of flared sides is not mandatory when the driveway is adjacent to grass. The purpose of the flared sides is primarily to protect pedestrians from stumbling into the ramp due to the corners and the drop in level. However, with the presence of an ample walkway, this hazard is mitigated. 370 Considering the rolled curb design and the context provided by the surrounding landscape, we believe that the flare ends are not necessary for pedestrian safety in this particular case. The current setup complies with the intent of ADA accessibility and ensures a safe environment for all users. We would greatly appreciate your kind consideration of this request to waive the correction item regarding the flared sides. Should you need any additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you for your understanding and attention to this matter. See attached explanation. Regards, Sherman Damuag 371 o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 D A T E I S S U E VELLUM DESIGN BUILD 3590 BROAD STREET, SUITE 130 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401 VELLUMDESIGNBUILD.COM PHONE 805.784.0487 FAX 805.784.0488 These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Vellum Design Build, Inc. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specified project and shall not be used otherwise without the expressed written permission of Vellum Design Build, Inc. © 2025 COPYRIGHT NOTICE ENCLAVE - LOT 24SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 934012025.02.19 BLDG. PERMIT SUB 1 T1.1 TITLE SHEET - BUILDING NEW 3,818.7 SQ.FT. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH BEDROOMS, 4 BATHROOMS, AN ATTACHED 765.2 SQ.FT. 2-CAR GARAGE, 367.3 SQ.FT. COVERED PATIO, AND 367.3 SQ.FT. ROOF DECK ON THE UPPER FLOOR. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE 136 LINEAR FEET OF RETAINING WALL. PERMIT HISTORY TRACT MAP ------3987 ORCUTT ROAD, FMAP-1955-2018 (TRACT 3063 PHASE 3) ARC PERMIT ------ARCH-0457-2024 BUILDING PERMIT ------(TBD) FIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT ------(TBD) DEMOLITION PERMIT ------(TBD) 101 101 1 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PROJECT J OHNS ON A VE BROAD ST SOUTH STCA L I F ORNI A B L V DFOOTHILL BLVD M A R SH STMONTEREYSAN LUIS DRIVEGRAND AVEORCUTT RD VICINITY MAPABBREVIATIONS A/C AIR CONDITIONING ABV.ABOVE ADDL.ADDITIONAL A.F.F.ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ALT.ALTERNATE AMT.AMOUNT APPROX.APPROXIMATE AVG.AVERAGE BD.BOARD BTWN.BETWEEN BLDG.BUILDING BLK. / BLKG.BLOCK / BLOCKING C.F.M.CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE CHG.CHANGE C.I.CAST IRON CLR.CLEAR/CLEARANCE CLG.CEILING CL CENTERLINE C.M.U.CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL.COLUMN CONC.CONCRETE CONSTR CONSTRUCTION C.O.T.G.CLEAN OUT TO GRADE CTR.CENTER CU. FT.CUBIC FOOT CU. IN.CUBIC INCH CU. YD.CUBIC YARD DBL.DOUBLE DEG.DEGREE DEPT.DEPARTMENT DIAG.DIAGONAL DIA.DIAMETER DIM.DIMENSION DIV.DIVISION D.S.DOWNSPOUT DW.DUMBWAITER / DOWNSPOUT (E)EXISTING EA.EACH ELEC.ELECTRIC ELEV.ELEVATION / ELEVATOR ENCL.ENCLOSURE EQ.EQUAL EQUIP.EQUIPMENT EXIST.EXISTING EXT.EXTERIOR F.D FLOOR DRAIN F.G FINISH GRADE F.H.FIRE HYDRANT FIN.FINISH FLR.FLOOR FLUOR.FLUORESCENT F.O.C.FACE OF CONCRETE F.O.F.FACE OF FINISH F.O.M.FACE OF MASONRY F.O.S.FACE OF STUD FS.FINISH SURFACE FT.FOOT FTG.FOOTING GA.GAUGE GAL.GALLON GALV.GALVANIZED GYP.GYPSUM H.B.HOSE BIBB HDR.HEADER HRDW.HARDWARE HORIZ.HORIZONTAL HP.HORSE POWER HT.HEIGHT I.D.INSIDE DIAMETER IN.INCH INFO.INFORMATION INSUL.INSULATION INT.INTERIOR JAN.JANITOR JCT.JUNCTION JT.JOINT KIT.KITCHEN LAV.LAVATORY LB,POUND L.F.LINEAL FOOT LIN.LINEAR LT.LIGHT LT.WT.LIGHT WEIGHT MAX.MAXIMUM M.B.MACHINE BOLT M.C.MEDICINE CABINET MECH.MECHANICAL MED.MEDIUM MEZZ,MEZZANINE MFR. / MFG.MANUFACTURER MIN.MINIMUM MISC.MISCELLANEOUS MTL.METAL (N)NEW PROJECT DATAPROJECT DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LEGEND DIRECTION OF VIEW A A6.0 DIRECTION OF VIEW INTERIOR ELEVATION MARKER SHEET NUMBER N.G.NATURAL GRADE N.I.C.NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE O/BOARD O.C.ON CENTER O.D.OUTSIDE DIAMETER OPNG.OPENING ORIG.ORIGINAL OZ.OUNCE PERP.PERPENDICULAR PL.PLATE P. LAM.PLASTIC LAMINATE PLY. WD.PLYWOOD P.O.C.POINT OF CONNECTION PR.PAIR PROJ.PROJECT P.S.F.POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT P.S.I.POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PVMT.PAVEMENT P.T.D.F.PRESSURE TREATED DOUG FIR QT.QUART QTY.QUANTITY R.RISER RAD.RADIUS RD.ROAD REF. REFRIGERATOR REINF.REINFORMENT REQ.REQUIRED REQ'S REQUIREMENTS RM.ROOM R.O.ROUGH OPENING R.T.S.REFER TO STRUCTURAL SCHED.SCHEDULE S.C.SOLID CORE SECT.SECTION SHWR.SHOWER SHT.SHEET SIMM.SIMILAR SPEC(S). SPECIFICATION(S) SQ.SQUARE SQ. FT.SQUARE FEET S.S.STAINLESS STEEL ST.STREET STD.STANDARD STL.STEEL STOR.STORAGE STRUCT.STRUCTURE SYM.SYMBOL T.TREAD T.O.C TOP OF CONCRETE/CURB TO.C.B.TOP OF CATCH BASIN TEL.TELEPHONE TEMO.TEMPERATURE TANDG TONGUE AND GROOVE THK.THICK TOIL.TOILET T.O.P.TOP OF PAVEMENT T.O.S.TOP OF SLAB T.O.W.TOP OF WALL TV TELEVISION TYP.TYPICAL UNFIN.UNFINISHED U.N.O.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE UR.URINAL V.VENT V.C.T.VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VENT.VENTILATE, VENTILATING VERT.VERTICAL V.T.R.VENT THRU ROOF W.C.WATER CLOSET WD.WOOD W.H.WATER HEATER W.I.WROUGHT IRON WOM.WOMEN W.P.WATERPROOFING WSCT.WAINSCOT W/WITH W/O WITHOUT ACRONYMS A.N.S.I.AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE A.S.T.M.AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS C.B.C.CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE I.C.B.O.INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS N.F.P.A.NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCATION O.S.H.P.D.OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT U.F.C.UNIFORM FIRE CODE W.I.C.WOODWORK INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION CUT REFERENCE CITY, AGENCY AND UTILITIES PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 919 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P:805.781.7170 BUILDING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. POLICE DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT CABLE / TELEPHONE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION ELECTRICITY GAS LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT WATER / SEWER 1042 WALNUT STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405 P:805.781.7317 CENTRAL COAST DISTRICT OFFICE 725 FRONT STREET, SUITE 300 SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 P:831.427.4863 F:831.427.4877 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 919 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P:805.781-7180 SLO CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2160 SANTA BARBARA AVENUE SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P:805.781.7380 PG&E SERVICE PLANNING DEPT. 4325 HIGUERA STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P:805.546.5247 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 919 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA. 9340` P:805.781.7220 SPECTRUM CABLE / CHARTER 270 BRIDGE STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, 93401 P:805.544.1962 SERVICE CITY OF SLO UTILITY DEPT. 879 MORRO STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P:805.781.7215 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT. 2156 SIERRA WAY SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P: 805.781.5544 F:805.781.4211 SOUTHERN CALIF. GAS COMPANY SAN LUIS OBISPO BRANCH OFFICE 1314 BROAD STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, 93401 P:1.800.228.7377 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FTF ENGINEERING, INC 1023 NIPOMO STREET, SUITE 210 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 CONTACT: JILLIAN VAN ENCKEVORT P : 805.544.1216 CIVIL ENGINEER WALSH ENGINERRING 1108 GARDEN STREET, SUITE 202-204 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 CONTACT: MATTHEW WALSH P: 805.319.4948 PROJECT TEAM LAND OWNER KEVIN AND DONNA LEWIS PO BOX 1148 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93406 PUBLIC WORKS NOTES A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. A SEPARATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR WITHIN CITY EASEMENTS FOR CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC UTILITIES, WORK REQUIRING AN ENCROACHEMENT PERMIT INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO DEMOLITIONS, UTILITIES, WATER, SEWER, AND FIRE SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS, STREET TREE PLANTING OR PRUNING CURB RAMPS, STREET PAVING, AND PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION OR CONSTRUCTION STAGING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION HOTLINE AT 781-7554 WITH AT LEAST 48 OUR NOTICE FOR ANY REQUIRED ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSPECTION OR FINAL INSPECTION. A TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW. THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS AND/OR OCCUPANCY OF ANY BUILDING. ANY PORTION OF DAMAGED OR DISPLACED CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK OR DRIVEWAY APPROACH SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DURING ALL DEMOLITIONS CONSTRUCTION, AND GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MESURES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS, PLANTINGS, AND FACILITIES ARE IN PLACE, TEMPORARY MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS. THE ADJOINING STREET SHALL BE CLEANED BY SWEEPING TO REMOVE DIRT, DUST, MUD AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH DAY. ALL WORK LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE UTILITIES AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS DATED MAY 2018. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES SLOPED FOUR HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL (4:1) AND GREATER AND AREAS USED TO CONVEY CONCENTRATED DRAINAGE SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED TO CONTROL EROSION BY EFFECTIVE PLANNING PLANTING TO BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION. ALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DESIGNED AT LESS THAN 2% SHALL HAVE FINAL GRADIENTS CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS. LANDSCAPE DESIGNER VELLUM INC. 3590 BROAD STREET, SUITE 130 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401 P: 805.784.0487 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA ENCLAVE -LOT 24 A / A4.01 SHEET NUMBER GENERAL NOTES A. B. C. D. E. DUST AND EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT CITY AND STATE WATER CONSERVATION REGULATIONS ANY WORK LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY UTILITIES AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS POTABLE WATER SHALL NOT BE USED FOR MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS GRADING AND DUST CONTROL AS REQUIRED UNDER PROHIBITED WATER USES; CHAPTER 17.07.070.C OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE. RECYCLED WATER IS AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION WATER PERMIT PROGRAM THE PROPOSED UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS IN EFFECT DURING THE TIME A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED, AND SHALL HAVE REASONABLE ALIGNMENTS AND CLEARANCES NEEDED FOR MAINTENANCE. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING CODES: 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC) 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CMC) 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CPC) 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC) 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCE STANDARDS CODE 2018 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ZONING REGULATIONS 2022 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND STANDARDS DOOR ID - REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE WINDOW ID - REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE D-# W-# ENERGY CONSULTANT TIMOTHY CARSTAIRS, CEA, HERS, GPR CARSTAIRS ENERGY, INC. 2238 BAYVIEW HEIGHTS DRIVE, SUITE E LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA 93402 P: 805.904.9048 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS A. B. PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE WATER-EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AS DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 17.87 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE THE ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE CALCULATION (ETWU) SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) #FINISH CALLOUT #KEYNOTE TRASH SAN LUIS GARBAGE 4388 OLD SANTA FE RD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P:805.543.0875 DESIGNER / BUILDER VELLUM INC. 3590 BROAD STREET, SUITE 130 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401 P: 805.784.0487 SOILS ENGINEER GEOSOLUTIONS KRAIG CROZIER 220 HIGH STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401 P: 805.439.1910 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REPORTS, PERMITS AND REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL INSPECTIONS A.REFER TO STRUCTURAL SHEETS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SPECIAL REPORTS A.SOILS REPORT # SL11087-1, DATED FEB 26, 2018 PREPARED BY GEOSOLUTIONS, INC. 220 HIGH STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 CONTACT KRAIG CROZIER, P.E. AT 805-543-8539 SPECIAL PERMITS A.ENCORACHEMNT PERMIT FOR ANY WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS A.ANY EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE OR SHALL BE TIED OUT BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE AND THEN REPLACED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8771 OF THE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE. B.ALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DESIGNED AT LESS THAN 2% SHALL HAVE FINAL GRADIENTS CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS. BMP TO BE IMPLEMENTED STANDARD BMP DESCRIPTION GOOD HOUSEKEEPING BMPS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 13-4.03C MAINTAIN, REPAIR, FUEL, STORAGE LOCATION, INSPECT VEHICLES STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT 13-4.03C COVER STOCKPILE, PLACE WADDLES SWEEPING 13-4.03F SWEEP WORK AREA DAILY AND PRIOR TO RAIN EVENTS SPILL MANAGEMENT 13-4.03 PLAN AND MATERIALS FOR MITIGATING SPILLS ONSITE WASTE MANAGEMENT BMPS SAW CUT SLURRY 13-4.03E(7)VACUUM SLURRY AND CONTAIN WASHOUT 13-9 PLASTIC LINED WASHOUT AREAS FOR CONCRETE AND TOOLS PORTABLE TOILETS 13-4.03D(4)PROVIDE AND ENSURE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SOLID WASTE 5-1.31 CONTAIN AND REMOVE TRASH FROM SITE DAILY PROJECT INFORMATION ADDRESS 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 PARCEL NUMBER 004-719-024 LOT NUMBER LOT 24 OF TRACT MAP 3063-PHASE 3 LOT SIZE 10,737 SF JURISDICTION CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ZONE R-1 BUILDING CODE DATA LEGEND OCCUPANCY R-3/U NUMBER OF STORIES TWO STORY CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-B (SPRINKLERED) FIRE SPRINKLERS YES (PROVIDED WITH SEPARATE PERMIT) ROOF RATING CLASS A FLOOR AREA RATIO N/A (2015 ZONING REGULATIONS) LOT COVERAGE 40% MAX., 4,294.8 SF MAX. (36.6% PROPOSED, 3,935 SF) SETBACKS REQUIRED PROVIDED FRONT YARD HOUSE (NORTH)15'-0"19'-4" FRONT YARD GARAGE (NORTH)20'-0"20'-0" REAR YARD (SOUTH)20-0"VARIES FROM 11'-2" TO 13'-5" TO 21'-4" SIDE YARD (EAST)5'-0"5'-1" SIDE YARD (WEST)5'-0"VARIES FROM 5'-0" TO 39'-3" PARKING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 2 COVERED 2 COVERED AT 2 CAR GARAGE HEIGHT LIMIT CALCULATION 25'-0" ABOVE AVG. GRADE LOW POINT 277.00' HIGH POINT 288.40' AVG. NATURAL GRADE 282.70' MAX HEIGHT CALC.282.70' + 25.00' = 307.70.' BUILDING HEIGHT 23.80' ABOVE AVG N.G. TOP OF RIDGE 306.5' 306.50' < 307.70' THERFORE OK IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE BUILDING FOOTPRINT 3,935.0 SQ.FT. 36.6 % FLATWORK 1,642.0SQ.FT. 15.3 % LANDSCAPING/NATURAL AREA 5,160.0 SQ.FT. 48.1 % TOTAL 10,737.0 SQ.FT. 100.0 % BUILDING AREA SUMMARY CONDITIONED UNCONDITIONED COVERED PATIO DECK LOWER FLOOR 1,369.8 SQ.FT.0 SQ.FT. 0 SQ.FT. 367.3 SQ.FT. UPPER FLOOR 2,448.9 SQ.FT. 765.2 SQ.FT. 367.3 SQ.FT.0 SQ.FT. ROOF DECK 0 SQ.FT. 0 SQ.FT. 0 SQ.FT.0 SQ.FT. TOTALS 3,818.7 SQ.FT. 765.2 SQ.FT. 367.3 SQ.FT.367.3 SQ.FT. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS THIS PROJECT CREATES OVER 2,500 SF SQUARE FEET OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND THEREFORE THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER REQUIREMENT 1. SITE DESIGN AND RUNOFF REDUCTION MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.DIRECT ROOF RUN OFF INTO VEGETATED AREA STORMWATER COMPLIANCE SUMMARY THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS (PR) OF REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD RESOLUTION R3-2013-0032 “POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE CENTRAL COAST REGION”: PR 1 SITE DESIGN/RUNOFF REDUCTION THROUGH USE OF: ☒ DIRECT ROOF RUN OFF INTO VEGITATED SWALE AS NOTED ON SHEET(S) C3.0, A1.0 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN BY WALSH ENGINEERING DATED 11/25/2023 CITY FIELD VERIFICATION. PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE, CONTACT THE CITY FOR FIELD VERIFICATION OF INSTALLED STRUCTURAL CONTROL MEASURES (SCMS) AND/OR OTHER REQUIRED ELEMENTS AS PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS WHERE "CONTINUOUS INSPECTION", "PERIODIC INSPECTION", OR "SPECIAL INSPECTION" ARE REQUIRED ON THE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, OR HIS AGENT SHALL EMPLOY AN INDEPENDENT, APPROVED TESTING AND INSPECTION AGENCY TO PROVIDE A DEPUTY INSPECTOR ON SITE, SAID DEPUTY INSPECTOR SHALL UNDERSTAND THAT THEY AS SUCH, ARE ACTING AS THE AGENT OF THE ENGINEER AND GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS. CONTINUOUS AND/OR PERIODIC SPECIAL INSPECTION ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING: CONCRETE: REINFORCING, PLACING OF CONCRETE, DURING TAKING OF TEST SPECIMENS, ETC., AS SPECIFIED BY CBC TABLE 1704.4 (EXCEPT NOT REQUIRED FOR FOUNDATION CONCRETE IF F'C DESIGN STRENGTH IS NOT MORE THAN 2500 PSI, AND FOR SITE WORK CONCRETE FULLY SUPPORTED ON EARTH) MASONRY: DURING PREPARATION AND TAKING OF MASONRY TEST SPECIMENS, PLACING OF ALL MASONRY UNITS, PLACEMENT OF MASONRY REINFORCEMENT, INSPECTION OF GROUT SPACE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO CLOSING OF CLEANOUTS, DURING ALL GROUTING OPERATIONS, ETC., AS SPECIFIED BY CBC TABLE 1704.5.1. EPOXY/ADHESIVE ANCHORS: IN CONCRETE AND MASONRY PER CURRENT "ICC' REPORT. STRUCTURAL WOOD: PERIODIC SPECIAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR NAILING, BOLTING, ANCHORING AND OTHER FASTENING OF COMPONENTS WITHIN THE SEISMIC-FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM, INCLUDING WOOD SHEAR WALLS, WOOD DIAPHRAGMS, DRAG STRUTS, BRACES, SHEAR PANELS AND HOLD-DOWNS, EXCEPTION: NOT REQUIRED WHERE SHEAR WALL FASTENER SPACING IS MORE THAN 4 INCHES ON CENTER. HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS: INSTALLATION OF HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SHALL BE PERIODICALLY INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AISC SPECIFICATIONS. SHOP WELDING: IF NOT PERFORMED IN AN APPROVED FABRICATION SHOP PER CBC SECTION 1704.2. FIELD WELDING: OF LOAD SUPPORTING STEEL MEMBERS. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR NEED NOT BE CONTINUOUSLY PRESENT DURING WELDING OF SINGLE-PASS FILLET WELDS NOT EXCEEDING 5/16" SIZE, PROVIDED THE MATERIALS, QUALIFICATIONS OF WELDING PROCEDURES, AND WELDER CERTIFICATIONS ARE VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK; PERIODIC INSPECTIONS ARE MADE OF WORK IN PROGRESS; AND A VISUAL INSPECTION OF ALL WELDS IS MADE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OR PRIOR TO SHIPMENT OF SHOP WELDING. SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE FOLLOWING PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION: ITEM REQUIRED INSPECTOR A.SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION YES GEOSOLUTIONS B.STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI NO C.STRUCTURAL MASONRY / RETAINING WALLS NO D.EPOXY / ADHESIVE ANCHORS NO E.STRUCTURAL WOOD YES GEOSOLUTIONS F.HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING NO G.FIELD WELDING NO DETACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SPECIAL REPORTS, FORMS, PERMITS, AND CERTIFICATIONS SPECIAL REPORTS A.GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING GEOSOLUTIONS INC., 220 HIGH STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401, PHONE 805.543.8539 GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE LETTER # SL13552-1, DATED SEPT. 11, 2023 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION # SL07509-10, DATED JAN. 8, 2019 SPECIAL ENERGY COMPLIANCE FORMS A.FORMS CF-2R AND CF-3R SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL SPECIAL PERMITS A.ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ANY WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SPECIAL CERTIFICATIONS AND VERIFICATIONS A.HERS FEATURES THAT REQUIRE 3RD PARTY FIELD-VERIFICATION REQUIRED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT COMPLIANCE REQUIRES FIELD-VERIFICATION BY A CERTIFIED HERS RATER AS A CONDITION FOR MEETING THE MODELED ENERGY PERFORMANCE FOR THIS COMPUTER ANALYSIS FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY: CARSTAIRS ENERGY, 2238 BAYVIEW HEIGHTS DRIVE, SUITE E, LOS OSOS, CA 93402 PHONE: (805) 904-9048 FAX: (805) 620-3774 EMAIL: TITLE24@YAHOO.COM 1.BUILDING-LEVEL VERIFICATIONS: • INDOOR AIR QUALITY VENTILATION (AFTER MECHANICAL INSTALL) • KITCHEN RANGE HOOD (AFTER MECHANICAL INSTALL) 2.COOLING SYSTEM VERIFICATIONS: • MINIMUM AIRFLOW (AFTER MECHANICAL INSTALL) • FAN EFFICACY WATTS/CFM (AFTER MECHANICAL INSTALL) 3.HVAC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM VERIFICATIONS: • DUCT LEAKAGE TESTING (AFTER MECHANICAL INSTALL) • VERIFIED HEAT PUMP RATED HEATING CAPACITY (AFTER MECHANICAL INSTALL) • VERIFIED DUCTS LOCATED ENTIRELY IN CONDITIONS SPACE (AFTER MECHANICAL INSTALL) B PAD CERTIFICATION REQUIRED A SOIL OR CIVIL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE GRADING PERFORMED IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND IS SUITABLE TO SUPPORT THE INTENDED STRUCTURE RESPONSIBLE PARTY: GENERAL CONTRACTOR, VELLUM INC. AND SOILS ENGINEER SHEET INDEX TITLE SHEETT1.1 T1.2 T-24 MANDATORY MEASUREMENTS T1.3 T1.4 GEOTECHNICAL / SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONST1.5 GEOTECHNICAL / SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - UPPER FLOOR FLOOR PLAN - LOWER FLOORA2.1 A2.3 FLOOR PLAN - UPPER FLOORA2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - LOWER FLOOR A2.4 A3.2 ROOF PLANA2.5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA3.1 GENERAL NOTESA0.0 BUILDING SECTIONSA4.2 BUILDING SECTIONSA4.1 BUILDING SECTIONSA4.3 DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULESA6.1 POWER AND LIGHTING PLAN - UPPER FLOORA6.2 POWER AND LIGHTING PLAN - LOWER FLOORA6.3 DETAILSA7.1 DETAILSA7.2 DETAILSA7.3 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANL1.0 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLANL2.0 INTERIOR ELEVATIONSA5.1 SITE PLAN + GAS PIPING PLANA1.0 CIVIL GENERAL NOTES CIVIL COVER SHEETC1.0 C2.0 CIVIL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC3.0 CIVIL UTILITY PLANC4.0 C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS CIVIL SITE CROSS SECTIONS C6.0 C6.1 CIVIL DETAILS EC1.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN EC2.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS RW1.0 RETAINING WALL PLAN AND PROFILE LANDSCAPE DETAILSL3.0 T1.6 T-24 MANDATORY MEASUREMENTS 57 SHEETSTOTAL MECHANICAL PLAN - MAIN HOUSEM1.0 GENERAL NOTES 1S-001 LEGENDSS-000 CONCRETE DETAILS 1S-300 FIRST FLOOR / FOUNDATION PLANS-200 CMU WALL DETAILSS-400 TJI FRAMING DETAILS 1S-601 FOUNDATION DETAILSS-310 TJI FRAMING DETAILS 2S-602 WOOD SHEAR WALL DETAILSS-610 ROOF TRUSS DETAILSS-620 ROOF FRAMING PLANS-202 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLANS-201 WOOD FRAMING DETAILS 1S-600 TRACT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RES. NO. 10618T1.7 TRACT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RES. NO. 10619T1.8 TRACT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RES. NO. 10619T1.9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ARCH-0455-2022T1.10 T-24 / CAL GREEN REQUIREMENTS / GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE LETTER BUILDING SECTIONSA4.4 01 STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTION - ENCLAVE LOT 24 - FTF SIGNED DATE: 02/04/2025 02 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (FTF ENGINEERING)DATE: 01/28/2025 03 TRUSS REVIEW LETTER, TRUSS PACKAGE (FTF ENGINEERING/HAYWARD, #416872)DATE: 02/04/2025 04A T-24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE - CF1RPRF01E (CARSTAIRS)DATE: 02/19/2025 04B HVAC REPORT, ACCA MANUAL (CARSTAIRS)DATE: 02/19/2025 05A GEOTECHNICAL PLAN REVIEW #4 (GEOSOLUTIONS, #SL13552-1-Lot 24 Hansen Lane)DATE: 02/12/2025 05B GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (GEOSOLUTIONS, #SL07509-10)DATE: 01/08/2019 07 ENCLAVE LOT 24 - ASSESSOR SET PLAN DATE: 02/19/2025 OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ESR-1825 ESR-2852 IB PVC SINGLE-PLY 60 TECH DATA SHEET IB FIRESHEET TECH DATA SHEET IB DENSDECK TECH DATA SHEET IB UL LISTING TGFU.R15546 ROOF METAL MERIDIAN DATA SHEET -MCELROY ROOF METAL UL790 FIRE RATING -MCELROY ROOF DRAIN SPECS ROOF VENT - STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF -OHAGIN BATH EXHAUST FAN PANFV-0511VKS2 FIREPLACE VECTOR LV74 SPEC SHEET FIREPLACE VECTOR INSTALLATION MANUAL ELEVATOR SPECS, DETAILS, INSTALL MANUAL (INCLINATOR ELEVETTE) GRADING KEY NOTES: GRADING GENERAL NOTES: GRADING LEGEND GENERAL LEGEND STORM DRAIN LEGEND: 99 100 D A T E I S S U E GENERAL LEGENDSANITARY SEWER KEY NOTES DRY UTILITY KEY NOTES STORM DRAIN KEY NOTES WATER KEY NOTES CAUTIONARY KEY NOTES UTILITY GENERAL NOTES STORM DRAIN LEGEND: WATER LEGEND: SANITARY SEWER LEGEND: DRY UTILITY LEGEND: C4.0 UTILITY PLAN Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call811 00 10'20' 10'SCALE: 1" = D A T E I S S U E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LOT 24 HANSEN LANESAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 934012/10/25 C5.0 SITE CROSS SECTIONS Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call811 D A T E I S S U E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LOT 24 HANSEN LANESAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 934012/10/25 C6.0 DETAILS D A T E I S S U E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LOT 24 HANSEN LANESAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 934012/10/25 GENERAL LEGEND D A T E I S S U E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LOT 24 HANSEN LANESAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call811 00 10'20' 10'SCALE: 1" = RW1.0 RETAINING WALL PROFILE 2/10/25 D A T E I S S U E VELLUM DESIGN BUILD 3590 BROAD STREET, SUITE 130 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401 VELLUMDESIGNBUILD.COM PHONE 805.784.0487 FAX 805.784.0488 These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Vellum Design Build, Inc. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specified project and shall not be used otherwise without the expressed written permission of Vellum Design Build, Inc. © 2025 COPYRIGHT NOTICE ENCLAVE - LOT 24SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93401L3.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 380 From:Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent:Friday, April 4, 2025 1:29 PM To:Nichols, Vanessa Subject:Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) Attachments:Outlook-Descriptio Hi Vanessa Nichols. May I request a copy of the redlines? The portal doesn't have it. See attached item #23 of the report for reference. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 11:06 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) Hi, I put any plan comments I had under “Fees”. I should have put “no action required" in this field. So nothing to address. Sorry for the confusion I caused. Vanessa Nichols Building Permit Services Supervisor Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E vnichols@slocity.org T 805.781.7588 slocity.org 381 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 11:03 AM To: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Vanessa Nichols, As a follow-up, I'm attaching the snip of the inquiry I sent to you yesterday, also appended in this email. Hoping to hear from you soon. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 4:54 PM To: vnichols@slocity.org <vnichols@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) April 03, 2025 VANESSA NICHOLS Building Permit Services Supervisor SLO Building and Safety Department City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMIT CORRECTION RESPONSES PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Dear Miss, 382 I have a clarification from your comment on the Permit Corrections: WATER (Building) v.1 - General -Water. There was no comment but noted as"Needs Resubmit". Could you please elaborate and the action needed to address this matter? See attached for your reference. I look forward to your prompt response and hope to hear from you soon. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 383 From:Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent:Friday, April 4, 2025 11:18 AM To:Nichols, Vanessa Subject:Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) Attachments:Outlook-Descriptio Thank you for the clarification. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 11:06 AM To: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: RE: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) Hi, I put any plan comments I had under “Fees”. I should have put “no action required" in this field. So nothing to address. Sorry for the confusion I caused. Vanessa Nichols Building Permit Services Supervisor Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E vnichols@slocity.org T 805.781.7588 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 11:03 AM To: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Subject: Re: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. 384 Hi Vanessa Nichols, As a follow-up, I'm attaching the snip of the inquiry I sent to you yesterday, also appended in this email. Hoping to hear from you soon. Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 From: Sherman Damuag <Sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 4:54 PM To: vnichols@slocity.org <vnichols@slocity.org> Cc: Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject: PERMIT CORRECTIONS REPORT (BLDG-0438-2025) April 03, 2025 VANESSA NICHOLS Building Permit Services Supervisor SLO Building and Safety Department City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 PERMIT CORRECTION RESPONSES PERMIT NUMBER: BLDG-0438-2025 PARCEL NUMBER: 004-719-024 PROJECT ADDRESS: ENLCAVE LOT 24 - 1424 HANSEN LANE, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Dear Miss, I have a clarification from your comment on the Permit Corrections: WATER (Building) v.1 - General -Water. There was no comment but noted as"Needs Resubmit". Could you please elaborate and the action needed to address this matter? See attached for your reference. I look forward to your prompt response and hope to hear from you soon. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. 385 Regards, Sherman Damuag o:805.784.0487 | c: 760.641.4077 | f: 805.784.0488 3590 Broad St, Ste 130 | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 sherman@vellumdesignbuild.com | Lic. no. 944631 393 From:Nichols, Vanessa Sent:Wednesday, March 12, 2025 3:04 PM To:Curry, Krista Cc:Stowe, Lala Subject:CSG Invoice B250278 Attachments:SLOUNIFLOW_919 Copyroom Copier iRC3926 Color_1273_001.pdf Hi, Attached is and invoice from CSG for plan review services for February 2025. I have reviewed the invoice and it is approved to be processed for payment. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Vanessa Nichols Building Permit Services Supervisor Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E vnichols@slocity.org T 805.781.7588 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: "Nichols, Vanessa" <vnichols@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 3:01 PM To: Nichols, Vanessa <vnichols@slocity.org> Subject: Attached Image ^^'csG CONSULTANTS \r/ 550 Pilgrim Foster City, Drive c494404 INVOICE Dale: 31412025 lnvoice No.: 8250278Mike Loew Deputy Building Official City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 Billing Type: Building Plan Review Services Account No.: CSG No City PC No Job Address Descriotion Period: 21112025 - 212812025 FED lD: 91-2053749 Fee CSG Fee 4415749 PLREV-0800-2024 609 Palm St 4500504 PLREV-0022-2025 1491 Monterey St 4500931 BLDG-2740-2024 614 Monterey St 4500952 PLREV-0060-2025 142211480Montereyst. 4500952 PLREV-0060-2O25 142211480Montereyst. 4501003 PLBLDG-0049. 2025 3745 Sueldo St Hourly $270.00 r/-REVISIONS #1 1- (Ref CSG 4212123) 5 level parking garage - Perimeter Netting & Ornamental Handrails. *Deferred* Previously proposed Brewing Equipment in 1st floor Food Prep area to be replaced with proposed Distillery Equipment. EMP needs in the immediate area updated as a result. Associated with CSG # 4404037 Structural review only - CSG Consultant -please review hourly Fire review - CSG Consultant 1st review only New performing qrts theqlre *Revision* Ref CSG# 4403990 Sub-slab section design to remove prior need for soil improvement defene{ submittal. *Revision* Ref CSG# 4403990 Sub-slab section design to remove prior need for soil improvem'ent deferred sqbmittal. BLDG- CSG - STRUCTURAL REVIEW ONLY FIRE- CSG REVIEW- REVIEW HOURLY Storage Build!ng *Deferred* Ref CSG# 4212123 Copper Dome Renovation of existing handball structure into a community center for apartment complex Frontage lmprovements * Deferred* RefCSG#4304516 Doors - Storefront New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 1 Type A. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*. New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 2 Type A. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*"* New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 4 Type B. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*"* New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 5 Type B. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.-"- New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 6 Type 91. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 7 Type B. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*- New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 3 Type C-ADU. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*. Hourly $202.5n \/ Hourly $z:,1,+o,.oo{ 4501401 4501405 4501440 4501 595 4501821 $27o.oo\/, $2,432.18\/ $17o.oo/, $13s.00y' $5,S98.75\r/ $2,064.56 / BLDG-2274-2022 609 Palm St BLDG-0331-2025 11343 Los Osos PLREV-0097-2025 609 Palm St PLREV-o114-2025 4600 Broad St Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly $3,741.81 Hourly Hourly $9,075.00 $3,176,25 $1,995.00 $1,995.00 $270.00y' sioz.so yl $877.sn\t/ BLDG-0089-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 1 4501831 BLDG-0090-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 2 4501833 BLDG-009'1-2025 1 130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 4 4501834 BLDG-0092-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 5 4501835 BLDG-0093-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 6 4501839 BLDG-0094-2025 1 '130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 7 4501841 BLDG-0096-2025 '1 130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 3 $1,995.00 $1,296.75 $1,995.00 $1,2s6.75/ $1,2s6.75/ $1,296.75 / $3,034.20 \t/$4,668.00 550 Pilgrim Drive Phone: 650-522-2500 Email: csqstaff@csqenqr.com Foster City, CA 94404 Fax: 650-522-2599 Online at www.csgwebsite.com ^^'csG CONSULTANTS \/ 550 Pilgrim Foster City, Drive cA 94404 INVOICE Dale:31412025 lnvoice No.: 8250278Mike Loew Deputy Building Official City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 Billing Type: Building Plan Review Services Account No.: Period: 21112025 - 212812025 FED lD: 91-2053749 GSG No Citv PG No Job Address Description Gity Fee CSG Fee 4501888 4501997 BLDG-0939-2025 811 Froom Ranch Wy BLDG-0438-2025 1424 Hansen Ln Tl for new restaurant space in shell building. New 3818st SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367.s-f roof dect on upper floo1. New build of accessory storage structures at the San Luis Ranch AG fields as allowed in the SLR Specific Plan and Conservation Easement. $1,66s.00 $7,770.00 . $1,082.e5 $5,050.50 $5,488.00 $3,567.20 J $1,689.12 $1,097.93 / 4502141 BLDG-2685-2024 1105 Calle Joaquin 4502200 BLDG-0365-2025 340GravesAve Demolish 98sf addition to lower garage 4 uppgr & Consiruct consisting workshop. 2 story of 4698sf Total Please remit payment to: CSG Consultants, lnc PO Box cA 91109-8485 *",''w 550 Pilgrim Drive Phone: 650-522-2500 Email : csgstraff@csgengr.com Foster City, CA 94404 Fax: 650-522-2599 Online at www.csgwebsite.com 394 From:Building <building@slocity.org> Sent:Tuesday, March 11, 2025 2:13 PM To:Vanessa Rogers Subject:RE: City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - Corrections Received, thank you! Erin Stanley Permit Technician I Community Development E EStanley@slocity.org T 805.781.7159 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Vanessa Rogers <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 1:56 PM To: Building <building@slocity.org> Subject: City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - Corrections This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Please see the attached "Correction" letter with regard to the above listed project. Feel free to contact our office with any questions or concerns. Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 395 From:Vanessa Rogers <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 11, 2025 1:56 PM To:Building Subject:City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - Corrections Attachments:451997.SLO1.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Please see the attached "Correction" letter with regard to the above listed project. Feel free to contact our office with any questions or concerns. Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 Letter of Transmittal 930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360 www.csgengr.com phone 1.888.794.2016 To:City of San Luis Obispo Date:March 11, 2025 Review No:1st 919 Palm Street CSG No.:451997 San Luis Obispo, CA. 93401 Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 Attn:Building Department Job Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Status: Plan requires corrections. See attached list.Plan is ready for permit issuance for the following: Architectural Energy Structural CalGreen Mechanical Wildland Urban Interface Plumbing Certified CASp Electrical Other: We have reviewed the following documents (Digital): X Plans X Energy Compliance Documents X Structural Calculations CalGreen Checklist – Not Applicable X Geotechnical Report X Specifications X Geotechnical Review Letter Wildland Urban Interface X Truss Calculations CASp Documents Truss Review Letter Response to Comments X Special Inspection Form X Other: HVAC Report Special items to note: Plans have been stamped by CSG. Environmental Health Services approval required. Special Inspection is required. Structural Observation is required. X Valuation $525,000 Please collect a plan review fee for hour(s) of plan check. Amount:$ Remarks: From: Christine Uhalde (B) Ash Arya, P.E. (S) CSG Consultants 451997 Page | 1 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION Date:March 11, 2025 Phone: 1.888.794.2016 Job Description: New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Email: planreview@csgengr.com Address:1424 Hansen Ln. Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025 INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW Please resubmit (3) complete sets of revised hardcopy plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit complete sets of revised digital plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. In addition to the below plan check comments, there may be additional comments from other departments and agencies having jurisdiction for this project (i.e. City of San Luis Obispo Planning, Public Works, Fire Prevention, etc.). PLAN CHECK COMMENTS 1. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit a complete set of plans and documents upon every resubmittal. Any missing plan sheets, missing stamps and/or signatures (where required) may delay the review process. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ 2. Submit written responses addressing each plan review comments below and a summary of changes for any additional modifications. In each response, refer to specific detail or sheet, or specific page of the supporting documents. Show compliance with all comments within the construction documents. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Architectural Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| A1. Please remove the “Not for Construction” text on the engineer stamp and provide a signature on each sheet from the individual responsible for the preparation of the sheet. Reference CRC R106.1 & Business and Professions Code 5536.2. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A2. Sheets T1.1, A2.1, A2,2, and the site plan are in the plan set twice (at the end of the plan), please revise accordingly. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A3. T1.1: Please indicate whether the solar plans will be a deferred submittal. If yes, provide a note on the cover sheet. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A4. A2.1, A2.2: The energy documents indicate R-21 on exterior walls; however, the “Wall Legends” indicate R-19, please revise accordingly. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A5. A2.2: Please call out Keynotes 1 & 2 to graphically identify the bathroom that will demonstrate compliance with 451997 Page | 2 aging-in-place. At least one bathroom on the entry level shall be provided with aging-in-place requirements. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A6. A2.5: Guards and rails shall be required when the clearance between the appliance and a roof edge or open end of an equipment platform is less than 6 feet. Please provide the dimensions between the heat pumps and the roof edge. If less than 6 feet, provide a guard or rail per CMC 303.8.4.1. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A7. A4.3: Keynote 16 references detail 34/A7.3; however, a corresponding detail was not found. Please revise accordingly. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A8. A4.4: Please amend the plans to show the handrail height for the stairs is not less than 34” and not more than 38” measured vertically from the sloped plane adjoining the tread nosing. (CRC R311.7.8.1) Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A9. A4.4: The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom rail of guard, shall not allow passage of a sphere 6” in diameter. Please provide a corresponding note to ensure the new stairs demonstrate compliance. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A10. A6.1: To accomplish the intent of aging-in- place, please revise door D-21 to have a net clear opening of not less than 32 inches (a 2’10 or 3’ door accomplishes this) per CRC R327.1.2. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A11. A6.1: Please indicate that Door Note #9 applies to door D-22 for safety and clarity. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A12. A6.1: Bedroom 1 does not meet egress requirements. W-18 appears to be a casement style window with no openings. Please provide an emergency rescue and escape opening in the bedroom per CRC R310.2. Ensure the clear opening area is not less than 5.7 sf. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A13. A6.1: The following errors were found in the window schedule: - The window schedule indicates that W-05 and W-22 meets egress. These windows are 3x2 and do not meet egress, please remove the egress indication. - Window W-06 has an egress indication; however, it is a fixed glass window. Please clarify and revise accordingly. To meet egress requirements for bedroom 4, this window cannot be fixed glass. - Windows W-02, W-03, W-04 indicate Type A which is fixed glass; however, the style shows tilt/turn. Please revise the Type # to be consistent with the Window Types provided. To meet egress for bedroom 2, fixed glass cannot be used for all 3 windows. - Windows W-09, W-11, W-12, W-13, W-28, W-30 indicates style B (tilt turn) however, the window style indicates fixed glass. Please revise accordingly. - Windows W-14, W-17 and W-24 indicates style A (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. - Windows W-21 and W-22 indicate Type D (fixed glass) however, the window style indicates tilt/turn. Please revise accordingly. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ A14. A6.1: Please revise Door Notes #9 to reflect the 2022 governing code. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Structural Plan Check Comments by |Ash Arya, asha@csgengr.com| 451997 Page | 3 S1. Update the olde code reference in soil report to the latest cycle in accordance with CBC 2022. The Geotech consultant may state in their review letter that the recommendation in the old report complies with CBC 2022. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. on plans design criteria notes, in the provided report or the update is consistent with values used in retaining wall calculations. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S2. Confirm the application of seismic component of lateral soil pressure on residence rtg walls concurrent with other load combos. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S3. Confirm that footing size, rebar in the 11 ft rtg wall calculations are consistent with plans. Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. in calculations is coordinated with updated report. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ S4. Confirm the 2J2.LC1 and RJ1.LC1 per vertical calculations key plans are consistent with plans sheets S-201 and S- 202 Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Mechanical Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| M1. A2.4: Please clarify the location of FAU #2. Ensure the distance from the attic access to the equipment shall not exceed 20 feet measured along the centerline of the passageway per CMC 304.4 Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Electrical Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| E1. A6.2: Please show a smoke alarm in bedroom 3 and bedroom 4. Additionally, a smoke and carbon monoxide alarm shall be installed directly outside the bedrooms per CRC R314.3. and CRC R315.3. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E2. A6.2: Please show the required receptacle outlet in the hallway in accordance with CEC Article 210.52(H). Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E3. A6.2: Bedroom 2 is mislabeled Bedroom 4. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E4. A6.3: All 125-volt through 250-volt receptacles in the laundry room shall be GFCI-protected outlets per CEC 210.8(A). Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E5. A6.3: Please indicate battery backup electrical for the proposed automatic garage door openers per the requirements of CRC section R309.4. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ E6. A6.3: Per R327.1.2 electrical receptacle outlets to be used by occupants shall be located no more than 48” measured from the top of the outlet box and not less than 15” measured from the bottom of the outlet box above the finish floor. Please add a corresponding note to the plans. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ 451997 Page | 4 E7. A6.3: Revise the Applicable General Notes to reflect the 2022 CEnC. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ Energy Plan Check Comments by |Christine Uhalde, christineu@csgengr.com| EN1. T1.2: The proposed dwelling has gas appliances. Please revise the Fuel Type on the energy report from “all electric” to “natural gas”. Response: ______________________________________________________________________ (End of Building Comments) 396 From:Kenia Joachin <kenia@csgengr.com> Sent:Thursday, March 6, 2025 4:50 PM To:Nichols, Vanessa; Timpano, Mika Cc:Steven Kanning Subject:February Plan Review Invoice Attachments:B250278-SLO-B.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Good Afternoon, Attached is the February Plan Review invoice. Thank you, Kenia Joachin Regional Operations Manager CSG Consultants, Inc. 550 Pilgrim Drive, Foster City, CA 94404 www.csgengr.com kenia@csgengr.com 650.522.2500 main 650.522.2539 direct 650.522.2599 fax Bay Area Green Business Certified _______________________ 550 Pilgrim Drive Foster City, CA 94404 _______________________ INVOICE Date:3/4/2025 Mike Loew Invoice No.:B250278 Deputy Building Official City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street Period:2/1/2025 - 2/28/2025 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 FED ID:91-2053749 Billing Type: Building Plan Review Services Account No.: CSG No City PC No Job Address Description City Fee CSG Fee 4415749 PLREV-0800-2024 609 Palm St *REVISIONS #11* (Ref CSG 4212123) 5 level parking garage - Perimeter Netting & Ornamental Handrails. Hourly $270.00 4500504 PLREV-0022-2025 1491 Monterey St *Deferred* Previously proposed Brewing Equipment in 1st floor Food Prep area to be replaced with proposed Distillery Equipment. EMP needs in the immediate area updated as a result. Associated with CSG # 4404037 Hourly $202.50 4500931 BLDG-2740-2024 614 Monterey St Structural review only – CSG Consultant – please review hourly Fire review – CSG Consultant 1st review only New performing arts theatre Hourly $7,140.00 4500952 PLREV-0060-2025 1422/1480 Monterey st.*Revision* Ref CSG# 4403990 Sub-slab section design to remove prior need for soil improvement deferred submittal. Hourly $270.00 4500952 PLREV-0060-2025 1422/1480 Monterey st.*Revision* Ref CSG# 4403990 Sub-slab section design to remove prior need for soil improvement deferred submittal. Hourly $202.50 4501003 PLBLDG-0049- 2025 3745 Sueldo St BLDG- CSG – STRUCTURAL REVIEW ONLY FIRE- CSG REVIEW – REVIEW HOURLY Storage Building Hourly $877.50 4501401 BLDG-2274-2022 609 Palm St *Deferred* Ref CSG# 4212123 Copper Dome Hourly $270.00 4501405 BLDG-0331-2025 11343 Los Osos Renovation of existing handball structure into a community center for apartment complex $3,741.81 $2,432.18 4501440 PLREV-0097-2025 609 Palm St Frontage Improvements Hourly $170.00 4501595 PLREV-0114-2025 4600 Broad St * Deferred* Ref CSG# 4304516 Doors - Storefront Hourly $135.00 4501821 BLDG-0089-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 1 New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 1 Type A. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** $9,075.00 $5,898.75 4501831 BLDG-0090-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 2 New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 2 Type A. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** $3,176.25 $2,064.56 4501833 BLDG-0091-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 4 New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 4 Type B. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** $1,995.00 $1,296.75 4501834 BLDG-0092-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 5 New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 5 Type B. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** $1,995.00 $1,296.75 4501835 BLDG-0093-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 6 New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 6 Type B1. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** $1,995.00 $1,296.75 4501839 BLDG-0094-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 7 New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 7 Type B. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** $1,995.00 $1,296.75 4501841 BLDG-0096-2025 1130 Orcutt Rd BLDG 3 New Multi-Family Development (7 BLDGS)- BLDG 3 Type C-ADU. ***Under Master Permit PLBLDG-0023-2025.*** $4,668.00 $3,034.20 550 Pilgrim Drive Foster City, CA 94404 Phone: 650-522-2500 Fax: 650-522-2599 Email: csgstaff@csgengr.com Online at www.csgwebsite.com _______________________ 550 Pilgrim Drive Foster City, CA 94404 _______________________ INVOICE Date:3/4/2025 Mike Loew Invoice No.:B250278 Deputy Building Official City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street Period:2/1/2025 - 2/28/2025 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 FED ID:91-2053749 Billing Type: Building Plan Review Services Account No.: CSG No City PC No Job Address Description City Fee CSG Fee 4501888 BLDG-0939-2025 811 Froom Ranch Wy TI for new restaurant space in shell building.$1,665.00 $1,082.25 4501997 BLDG-0438-2025 1424 Hansen Ln New 3818st SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. $7,770.00 $5,050.50 4502141 BLDG-2685-2024 1105 Calle Joaquin New build of accessory storage structures at the San Luis Ranch AG fields as allowed in the SLR Specific Plan and Conservation Easement. $5,488.00 $3,567.20 4502200 BLDG-0365-2025 340 Graves Ave Demolish 98sf workshop & Construct 2 story addition to existing garage consisting of 4698sf lower storage & 314 upper workshop. $1,689.12 $1,097.93 Total:$38,952.07 Please remit payment to: CSG Consultants, Inc. PO Box 8485, Pasadena, CA 91109-8485 550 Pilgrim Drive Foster City, CA 94404 Phone: 650-522-2500 Fax: 650-522-2599 Email: csgstaff@csgengr.com Online at www.csgwebsite.com 397 From:Kelly Fickle <centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 4:26 PM To:Building Subject:City of San Luis Obispo - 4501997 - BLDG-0438-2025 - 1424 Hansen Ln - In Review This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Confirmation of Plan Check Submittal 2/25/2025 Our plan check office has processed your plan check for review. We will keep you informed by sending our correction letters, notification, and/or correspondence to you as we completed and process the reviews. Please attach this email to your plan check file for future references. Plan Check Name: New 3818st SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor. Plan Check # : 4501997 / BLDG-0438-2025 Items Received: 2/25/2025 Due Date: 3/11/2025 Thank you, Central Valley Office 930 Fresno St, Newman CA 95360 Ph: 888-794-2016 398 From:Building <building@slocity.org> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 3:37 PM To:centralvalleydrt@csgengr.com Subject:1424 Hansen - New submittal documents receival confirmation request Good afternoon, I just uploaded 13 documents to the portal for 1424 Hansen (BLDG-0438-2025). Can you please confirm you received them? The due date has been set at 03/24/2025 for comment or approval. We need your team to complete the building review. If you have any questions, please let us know. Thank you, Erin Stanley Permit Technician I Community Development E EStanley@slocity.org T 805.781.7159 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 399 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Monday, January 6, 2025 10:33 AM To:Robert Heckey <robert@vellumdesignbuild.com> Subject:Application ARCH-0457-2024 (1429 Parsons, etc.): Decision Letter Attachments:Application ARCH-0457-2024 (1429 Parsons, etc.): Decision Letter See attached. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Friday, December 20, 2024 3:58 PM To:Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc:Robert Heckey <robert@vellumdesignbuild.com>; TJ Esser (tj@vellumdesignbuild.com) Subject:Application ARCH-0457-2024 (1429 Parsons, etc.): Decision Letter Attachments:Decision Letter (Dec 19 2024).pdf Hello Mr. Abbot, I write to let you know that your Architectural Review application regarding development of three lots in Enclave at Righetti (Lots 23, 24, & 34) with single-family dwellings was approved on December 19 th, as described in the attached decision letter. Note that any interested party may appeal the decision within 10 days (through December 30 th). We will notify you if an appeal is received by our office. Feel free to contact me any time with questions or concerns you may have about the action described in the attached letter. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development, 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3218, 805.781.7170, slocity.org December 19, 2024 Paul Abbott 3590 Broad St Suite 130 San Luis Obispo CA 93401 SUBJECT: ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Architectural Review of three single-family dwellings in Enclave at Righetti (Lots 23, 24, AND 34), including requests for rear setback reduction and exceptions to height limits for walls, fences, and hedges Dear Mr. Abbot: On December 19, 2024, I reviewed your Architectural Review application regarding the construction of three single-family dwellings in the Enclave at Righetti, at 1429 Parsons Way (Lot 23), 1424 Hansen Lane (Lot 23), and 1469 Hansen Lane (Lot 34), including a reduction of the rear setback standard to between 11 and 14 feet (where the standard is 20 feet) for a limited portion of the dwelling on Lot 24, a reduction in the front yard setback standard to 15 feet for a side-loaded garage on Lot 23 (where the standard is 20 feet), and exceptions from height limits for walls and fences to allow combined height of retaining walls and privacy fencing up to 9 feet along certain portions of property boundaries (where the standard is 6 feet). After careful consideration, I have approved the application, based on findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the policies and goals of the City’s General Plan and with the Orcutt Area Specific Plan. It promotes policies related to residential project objectives (Land Use Element Policy 2.3.11). Privacy, useable outdoor area, views, and adequate parking and storage space are features of the proposed residential building program. Front yards and street-facing entryways facilitating neighborhood interaction are encouraged by the Orcutt Area Specific Plan and have been incorporated into the design of the proposed homes. 2. A minor reduction in the rear yard setback for the dwelling proposed for Lot 24 is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Regulations and development standards set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan for residential development. Encroachment into the 20- foot rear setback is limited to between 6 and 9 feet, and 125 square feet in area, for a single-story portion of the dwelling. The setback reduction provides adequate consideration of potential adverse impacts on surrounding properties, as solar exposure and privacy will not be significantly reduced for any neighboring properties ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 2 3. A minor reduction of 5 feet from the 20-foot front setback standard for garages set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan, to accommodate the garage for the dwelling on Lot 23 is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Regulations and development standards set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan for residential development. The setback reduction provides adequate consideration of potential adverse impacts on surrounding properties, as the garage is of a “side-loaded” configuration (rather than taking access directly from the street) and aligned parallel to the street frontage at the 15-foot front setback applicable to houses within the development. 4. A minor exception from height limits for fences, walls, and hedged to allow combined retaining wall and fence height up to nine feet (where the standard height limit is six feet) in limited portions of property boundaries is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Regulations and development standards set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan for residential development. The excess height is necessary due to the sloped topography and grade change at the boundary between certain properties. 5. The minor building encroachment into a rear yard setback, front setback reduction for one garage, and exceptions from height limits for fences, walls, and hedges are consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Similar minor setback encroachments for limited portions of dwellings have been employed in several other lots within the vicinity to address constraints arising from unusual lot shape and topography. The side- loaded garage on Lot 23 is set back 15 feet from the street frontage, consistent with setbacks for house structures in the development, and oriented perpendicular to the street frontage to present a building wall, rather than the garage doors, to view from the street. At the three specific boundary areas identified in the applicant’s Exception statement, the “low side” of the retaining walls and adjacent privacy fencing is located on the subject properties and the excess height will not be perceived from neighboring property The 9-foot combined maximum height in these areas is consistent with maximum standards established in Zoning Regulations (§17.70.070(F)(3)) for certain cases involving fencing installed on retaining walls. 6. While circumstances related to lot shape and topography make strict adherence to the certain standards impractical for the siting of the dwelling on Lot 24, siting of the garage on Lot 23, and placement of fencing at three portions of property boundaries, the project nonetheless conforms with the intent of Zoning Regulations and the Specific Plan. Siting of the dwelling on Lot 24 is constrained by an unusual lot shape and the depth of the rear setback standard set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan (four times the normal setback standard of the City’s Zoning Regulations). Siting of the garage for the dwelling on Lot 23 is similarly constrained by an unusual lot shape, along with a curving street frontage. Sloped topography and grade changes between Lots 23 and 21, between Lots 24 and 22, and between Lots 34 and 33 constrain placement of retaining walls and fencing between these properties. The limited amount of setback encroachment by single-story structure, alignment of a side-loaded garage with the prevailing front setbacks for houses in the development, and limited excess wall and fence height nonetheless provide privacy, air circulation, views, and exposure to sunlight, consistent with the intent of standards for setbacks and fence and wall height. 7. The architectural styles of the proposed dwellings are consistent with Community Design Guidelines for residential development and with the Design Guidelines ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 3 described in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan. Farmhouse and Modern plan styles are employed, providing variation within the general residential theme. The architectural styles are complementary to the surrounding neighborhood including site design, roofing style, covered entries, balconies, siding materials, finish, and scale. The project design incorporates articulation, massing, and a mix of color and finish materials that are compatible with the neighborhood and complementary to other development within the vicinity. 8. On December 16, 2024, the Architectural Review Commission found the project consistent with applicable design standards and guidelines. 9. The project is consistent with the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Orcutt Area Specific Plan and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Righetti Vesting Tentative Tract Map #3063. The siting and design of the proposed dwellings follow the guidelines provided in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan, with minor exceptions, and construction of the dwellings would not result in any new impacts beyond what was identified in the previous environmental documents, and is subject to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted with the certified EIR and adopted MND. Conditions: Please note the project conditions of approval do not include mandatory code requirements. Code compliance will be verified during the plan check process, which may include additional requirements applicable to your project. Planning 1. Conformance to prior approvals. The project shall comply with conditions established under City Council Resolutions 10618 (2015 Series) and 10619 (2015 Series). 2. Compliance with approved plans. Final project design and construction drawings submitted for a building permit shall be in substantial compliance with the plans approved under this application. A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that lists all conditions and code requirements of project approval (typically listed as Sheet Number 2). Reference shall be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 3. Limited setback reduction. Final plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall clearly indicate all setback dimensions. Reductions in rear setback standards shall be limited to the single-story elements of the dwelling proposed to be constructed on Lot 24, and reduction of the front setback shall be limited to the garage structure for Lot 23, as described in the Exception Statement and depicted in Project Plans submitted with this application. 4. Limited fence and wall height exception. Final plans submitted construction permits to complete the project shall clearly indicate the location, extent, and height of all fences and walls. Authorization of excess fence and wall height is limited to those areas described in the Exception Statement and depicted in Project Plans submitted with this ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 4 application, where the combined height of retaining walls and fences ranges between six and nine feet. Fencing installed within the setback areas under this exception shall be of wood material and of a conventional design consistent with the residential character of the site and vicinity. 5. Fencing design. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete this project shall include elevation and detail drawings of all walls and fences. All proposed fences and retaining walls shall be of high-quality materials. All fencing facing the public right-of- way shall be constructed with the finished side of the fence facing the public right-of- way. For the lifetime of the fence, the owner shall conduct all necessary repairs and maintenance to ensure the fence and associated landscaping (between the fence and the property line) remain in a high-quality and orderly condition. 6. Colors and materials. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall call out the colors and materials of all proposed building surfaces and other improvements. Colors and materials shall be consistent with colors and materials depicted in plans submitted with the Architectural Review application. The applicant shall note the texture (use of smooth or sand finish) and appearance of stucco materials on the building plans to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 7. Lighting. The locations of all lighting, including bollard style landscaping or path lighting, shall be included in plans submitted for a building permit. All wall-mounted lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. All wall mounted lighting shall complement building architecture. The lighting schedule for the building shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cutsheets on the submitted building plans. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to ensure that light is directed downward consistent with the requirements of the City's Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Zoning Regulations Section 17.70.100 (Lighting and Night Sky Preservation). 8. Equipment screening. All ducts, meters, air conditioning equipment, and all other mechanical equipment, whether on the ground, on the structure or elsewhere, shall be screened from public view with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure. Public view includes the existing views from all public streets and sidewalks. Gas and electric meters, electric transformers, and large water piping systems (backflow prevention devices) shall be completely screened from public view with approved architectural features and/or landscape plantings and/or placed in the interior of the structure. Utilities 9. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall include final landscape and irrigation plans for each lot. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Utilities Department. 10. Tract landscaping fronting Lots 23 and 34 is not irrigated by recycled water. Plans for the project shall be corrected accordingly. 11. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall depict a backflow preventor on all potable water connections. This is required due to the presence of adjacent recycled water-irrigated landscape areas. ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 5 Indemnification 12. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim." Code Compliance Notes: Engineering 1. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project must include a complete site, grading, drainage, landscape, and utility plan for reference. The plans shall show and label all existing property lines, easements, and existing improvements along with any proposed changes. The plan shall honor all existing easements and improvements unless otherwise specifically approved by the Community Development Department. 2. The grading and drainage plan must show and note compliance with Post Construction Stormwater Regulations as approved for the subdivision and in conjunction with subdivision improvement plan approval unless the supporting documentation is revised to show a different compliance strategy for applicable Performance Requirements. My action is final unless appealed within 10 calendar days of the date of the decision. Anyone may appeal the action by submitting a letter to the Community Development Department within the time specified. The appropriate appeal fee must accompany the appeal documentation. Appeals will be scheduled for the first available Architectural Review Commission meeting date. If an appeal is filed, you will be notified by mail of the date and time of the hearing. The Community Development Director’s approval of this project will automatically expire in one year, unless plans for a building permit have been submitted, or unless a different expiration date or unlimited expiration is stipulated at the time of approval, per Municipal Code section 2.48.070. On request, the Community Development Director may grant a single, one-year extension, provided, that approval not exceed a maximum of two years from the date of original approval. If you have any questions, or if you need additional information, please contact Walter Oetzell, Assistant Planner at (805) 781-7593. Sincerely, Brian Leveille Principal Planner Community Development ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 6 cc: Architectural Review Commission Chair County of SLO Assessor’s Office Property Owner Emadzadeh Family Trust 369 Mesa Way San Luis Obispo CA 93401 400 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Friday, December 20, 2024 3:58 PM To:Paul Abbott <paul@vellumdesignbuild.com> Cc:Robert Heckey <robert@vellumdesignbuild.com>; TJ Esser (tj@vellumdesignbuild.com) Subject:Application ARCH-0457-2024 (1429 Parsons, etc.): Decision Letter Attachments:Decision Letter (Dec 19 2024).pdf Hello Mr. Abbot, I write to let you know that your Architectural Review application regarding development of three lots in Enclave at Righetti (Lots 23, 24, & 34) with single-family dwellings was approved on December 19 th, as described in the attached decision letter. Note that any interested party may appeal the decision within 10 days (through December 30 th). We will notify you if an appeal is received by our office. Feel free to contact me any time with questions or concerns you may have about the action described in the attached letter. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development, 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3218, 805.781.7170, slocity.org December 19, 2024 Paul Abbott 3590 Broad St Suite 130 San Luis Obispo CA 93401 SUBJECT: ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Architectural Review of three single-family dwellings in Enclave at Righetti (Lots 23, 24, AND 34), including requests for rear setback reduction and exceptions to height limits for walls, fences, and hedges Dear Mr. Abbot: On December 19, 2024, I reviewed your Architectural Review application regarding the construction of three single-family dwellings in the Enclave at Righetti, at 1429 Parsons Way (Lot 23), 1424 Hansen Lane (Lot 23), and 1469 Hansen Lane (Lot 34), including a reduction of the rear setback standard to between 11 and 14 feet (where the standard is 20 feet) for a limited portion of the dwelling on Lot 24, a reduction in the front yard setback standard to 15 feet for a side-loaded garage on Lot 23 (where the standard is 20 feet), and exceptions from height limits for walls and fences to allow combined height of retaining walls and privacy fencing up to 9 feet along certain portions of property boundaries (where the standard is 6 feet). After careful consideration, I have approved the application, based on findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the policies and goals of the City’s General Plan and with the Orcutt Area Specific Plan. It promotes policies related to residential project objectives (Land Use Element Policy 2.3.11). Privacy, useable outdoor area, views, and adequate parking and storage space are features of the proposed residential building program. Front yards and street-facing entryways facilitating neighborhood interaction are encouraged by the Orcutt Area Specific Plan and have been incorporated into the design of the proposed homes. 2. A minor reduction in the rear yard setback for the dwelling proposed for Lot 24 is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Regulations and development standards set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan for residential development. Encroachment into the 20- foot rear setback is limited to between 6 and 9 feet, and 125 square feet in area, for a single-story portion of the dwelling. The setback reduction provides adequate consideration of potential adverse impacts on surrounding properties, as solar exposure and privacy will not be significantly reduced for any neighboring properties ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 2 3. A minor reduction of 5 feet from the 20-foot front setback standard for garages set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan, to accommodate the garage for the dwelling on Lot 23 is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Regulations and development standards set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan for residential development. The setback reduction provides adequate consideration of potential adverse impacts on surrounding properties, as the garage is of a “side-loaded” configuration (rather than taking access directly from the street) and aligned parallel to the street frontage at the 15-foot front setback applicable to houses within the development. 4. A minor exception from height limits for fences, walls, and hedged to allow combined retaining wall and fence height up to nine feet (where the standard height limit is six feet) in limited portions of property boundaries is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Regulations and development standards set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan for residential development. The excess height is necessary due to the sloped topography and grade change at the boundary between certain properties. 5. The minor building encroachment into a rear yard setback, front setback reduction for one garage, and exceptions from height limits for fences, walls, and hedges are consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Similar minor setback encroachments for limited portions of dwellings have been employed in several other lots within the vicinity to address constraints arising from unusual lot shape and topography. The side- loaded garage on Lot 23 is set back 15 feet from the street frontage, consistent with setbacks for house structures in the development, and oriented perpendicular to the street frontage to present a building wall, rather than the garage doors, to view from the street. At the three specific boundary areas identified in the applicant’s Exception statement, the “low side” of the retaining walls and adjacent privacy fencing is located on the subject properties and the excess height will not be perceived from neighboring property The 9-foot combined maximum height in these areas is consistent with maximum standards established in Zoning Regulations (§17.70.070(F)(3)) for certain cases involving fencing installed on retaining walls. 6. While circumstances related to lot shape and topography make strict adherence to the certain standards impractical for the siting of the dwelling on Lot 24, siting of the garage on Lot 23, and placement of fencing at three portions of property boundaries, the project nonetheless conforms with the intent of Zoning Regulations and the Specific Plan. Siting of the dwelling on Lot 24 is constrained by an unusual lot shape and the depth of the rear setback standard set out in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan (four times the normal setback standard of the City’s Zoning Regulations). Siting of the garage for the dwelling on Lot 23 is similarly constrained by an unusual lot shape, along with a curving street frontage. Sloped topography and grade changes between Lots 23 and 21, between Lots 24 and 22, and between Lots 34 and 33 constrain placement of retaining walls and fencing between these properties. The limited amount of setback encroachment by single-story structure, alignment of a side-loaded garage with the prevailing front setbacks for houses in the development, and limited excess wall and fence height nonetheless provide privacy, air circulation, views, and exposure to sunlight, consistent with the intent of standards for setbacks and fence and wall height. 7. The architectural styles of the proposed dwellings are consistent with Community Design Guidelines for residential development and with the Design Guidelines ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 3 described in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan. Farmhouse and Modern plan styles are employed, providing variation within the general residential theme. The architectural styles are complementary to the surrounding neighborhood including site design, roofing style, covered entries, balconies, siding materials, finish, and scale. The project design incorporates articulation, massing, and a mix of color and finish materials that are compatible with the neighborhood and complementary to other development within the vicinity. 8. On December 16, 2024, the Architectural Review Commission found the project consistent with applicable design standards and guidelines. 9. The project is consistent with the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Orcutt Area Specific Plan and adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Righetti Vesting Tentative Tract Map #3063. The siting and design of the proposed dwellings follow the guidelines provided in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan, with minor exceptions, and construction of the dwellings would not result in any new impacts beyond what was identified in the previous environmental documents, and is subject to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted with the certified EIR and adopted MND. Conditions: Please note the project conditions of approval do not include mandatory code requirements. Code compliance will be verified during the plan check process, which may include additional requirements applicable to your project. Planning 1. Conformance to prior approvals. The project shall comply with conditions established under City Council Resolutions 10618 (2015 Series) and 10619 (2015 Series). 2. Compliance with approved plans. Final project design and construction drawings submitted for a building permit shall be in substantial compliance with the plans approved under this application. A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that lists all conditions and code requirements of project approval (typically listed as Sheet Number 2). Reference shall be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 3. Limited setback reduction. Final plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall clearly indicate all setback dimensions. Reductions in rear setback standards shall be limited to the single-story elements of the dwelling proposed to be constructed on Lot 24, and reduction of the front setback shall be limited to the garage structure for Lot 23, as described in the Exception Statement and depicted in Project Plans submitted with this application. 4. Limited fence and wall height exception. Final plans submitted construction permits to complete the project shall clearly indicate the location, extent, and height of all fences and walls. Authorization of excess fence and wall height is limited to those areas described in the Exception Statement and depicted in Project Plans submitted with this ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 4 application, where the combined height of retaining walls and fences ranges between six and nine feet. Fencing installed within the setback areas under this exception shall be of wood material and of a conventional design consistent with the residential character of the site and vicinity. 5. Fencing design. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete this project shall include elevation and detail drawings of all walls and fences. All proposed fences and retaining walls shall be of high-quality materials. All fencing facing the public right-of- way shall be constructed with the finished side of the fence facing the public right-of- way. For the lifetime of the fence, the owner shall conduct all necessary repairs and maintenance to ensure the fence and associated landscaping (between the fence and the property line) remain in a high-quality and orderly condition. 6. Colors and materials. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall call out the colors and materials of all proposed building surfaces and other improvements. Colors and materials shall be consistent with colors and materials depicted in plans submitted with the Architectural Review application. The applicant shall note the texture (use of smooth or sand finish) and appearance of stucco materials on the building plans to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 7. Lighting. The locations of all lighting, including bollard style landscaping or path lighting, shall be included in plans submitted for a building permit. All wall-mounted lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. All wall mounted lighting shall complement building architecture. The lighting schedule for the building shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cutsheets on the submitted building plans. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to ensure that light is directed downward consistent with the requirements of the City's Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Zoning Regulations Section 17.70.100 (Lighting and Night Sky Preservation). 8. Equipment screening. All ducts, meters, air conditioning equipment, and all other mechanical equipment, whether on the ground, on the structure or elsewhere, shall be screened from public view with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure. Public view includes the existing views from all public streets and sidewalks. Gas and electric meters, electric transformers, and large water piping systems (backflow prevention devices) shall be completely screened from public view with approved architectural features and/or landscape plantings and/or placed in the interior of the structure. Utilities 9. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall include final landscape and irrigation plans for each lot. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Utilities Department. 10. Tract landscaping fronting Lots 23 and 34 is not irrigated by recycled water. Plans for the project shall be corrected accordingly. 11. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project shall depict a backflow preventor on all potable water connections. This is required due to the presence of adjacent recycled water-irrigated landscape areas. ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 5 Indemnification 12. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim." Code Compliance Notes: Engineering 1. Plans submitted for construction permits to complete the project must include a complete site, grading, drainage, landscape, and utility plan for reference. The plans shall show and label all existing property lines, easements, and existing improvements along with any proposed changes. The plan shall honor all existing easements and improvements unless otherwise specifically approved by the Community Development Department. 2. The grading and drainage plan must show and note compliance with Post Construction Stormwater Regulations as approved for the subdivision and in conjunction with subdivision improvement plan approval unless the supporting documentation is revised to show a different compliance strategy for applicable Performance Requirements. My action is final unless appealed within 10 calendar days of the date of the decision. Anyone may appeal the action by submitting a letter to the Community Development Department within the time specified. The appropriate appeal fee must accompany the appeal documentation. Appeals will be scheduled for the first available Architectural Review Commission meeting date. If an appeal is filed, you will be notified by mail of the date and time of the hearing. The Community Development Director’s approval of this project will automatically expire in one year, unless plans for a building permit have been submitted, or unless a different expiration date or unlimited expiration is stipulated at the time of approval, per Municipal Code section 2.48.070. On request, the Community Development Director may grant a single, one-year extension, provided, that approval not exceed a maximum of two years from the date of original approval. If you have any questions, or if you need additional information, please contact Walter Oetzell, Assistant Planner at (805) 781-7593. Sincerely, Brian Leveille Principal Planner Community Development ARCH-0457-2024 (Enclave at Righetti, Lots 23, 24, & 34) Page 6 cc: Architectural Review Commission Chair County of SLO Assessor’s Office Property Owner Emadzadeh Family Trust 369 Mesa Way San Luis Obispo CA 93401 401 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Friday, August 9, 2024 12:30 PM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:New Application: ARCH-0457-2024 (1429 Parsons) Attachments:Plan Detailed Report.pdf Hello Tyler, Attached is a Plan Detailed Report for new application ARCH-0457-2024 (1429 Parsons), regarding construction of three new single-family dwellings in Enclave at Righetti. Application fee paid, ready for assignment. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications PLAN DETAILED REPORT ARCH-0457-2024 FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Architectural Review 08/02/2024App Date:Project:Plan Type: CitywideMinor/Incidental NOT AVAILABLEExp Date:District:Work Class: 0.00Under Review NOT COMPLETEDCompleted:Square Feet:Status: Description: Valuation: NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON LOTS 23, 24, AND 34 WITHIN THE ENCLAVE RIGHETTI SUBDIVISION. IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE A VARIED STREETSCAPE THE HOME PLANS WILL HAVE DISINCT COLOR SCHEMES AND INDIVIDUAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLES. EACH OF THE PLANS WILL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE PRIME LOCATION, VIEWS, LOT SIZE, AND ADJACNET HOMES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. THE DESIGN INSPIRATION FOR EACH HOME IS DRAWN FROM A CALIFORNIA MEDITERRANEAN STYLES. THESE STYLES ARE REPRESENTED THROUGH THE USE OF NATURAL STONE, BRICK, STUCCO, AND WOOD SIDING. ATTENTION HAS BEEN TAKEN TO CONSIDER HOW THE PROPOSED DESIGNS TIE INTO THE ECLECTIC MIX OF HOMES RECENTLY GRANTED ARC APPROVAL WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. $0.00 Assigned To:Tyler Corey Approval Expire Date: Parcel:004-719-034 004-719-024 Main004-719-023 Address:1469 Hansen Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 1429 Parsons Wy San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Main 1424 Hansen Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Zone: Owner Vivien Barkidjija 3500 N Lakeshore Dr Apt 12C Chicago, IL 60657 Business: 7082186993 Owner Kevin Lewis PO Box 1148 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Business: 8052350463 Representative Robert Heckey 3590 Broad St #130 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: 8057840487 Owner Emadzadeh Family Trust Linda Emadzadeh 369 Mesa Wy San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: 4152506154 Representative Paul Abbott 3590 Broad St 130 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: 8057840487104 Applicant Paul Abbott 3590 Broad St 130 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: 8057840487104 Owner Donna Lewis PO Box 1148 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Business: 8052350463 Created ByNote Date and Time Created 1.Walter OetzellCOMPLETENESS REVIEW v1 (comments due 8/22) [Digital Plan Routing] Building Engineering Fire Utilities 08/08/2024 Invoice No.Amount PaidFeeFee Amount 00036652 $2,016.42 Arch Review: Minor-Incidental- Application $2,016.42 $156.95 IT Surcharge $156.95 $3,129.42 Arch Review: Minor-Incidental- Completion $3,129.42 $5,302.79 $5,302.79 Total for Invoice 00036652 Grand Total for Plan $5,302.79 $5,302.79 Page 1 of 1City of San Luis ObispoAugust 09, 2024