HomeMy WebLinkAbout_BLDG-0438-2025-CSG BLDG V3Letter of Transmittal
930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360 www.csgengr.com
phone 1.888.794.2016
To:City of San Luis Obispo Date:July 16, 2025 Review No:3rd
919 Palm Street CSG No.:451997
San Luis Obispo, CA. 93401 Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025
Attn:Building Department Job Address:1424 Hansen Ln.
Job Description:
New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage, 367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor.
Status: Plan requires corrections. See attached list.Plan is ready for permit issuance for the following:
Architectural Energy
Structural CalGreen
Mechanical Wildland Urban Interface
Plumbing Certified CASp
Electrical Other:
We have reviewed the following documents
(Digital):
X Plans X Energy Compliance Documents
X Structural Calculations CalGreen Checklist – Not Applicable
X Geotechnical Report X Specifications
X Geotechnical Review Letter Wildland Urban Interface
X Truss Calculations CASp Documents
Truss Review Letter Response to Comments
X Special Inspection Form X Other: HVAC Report
Special items to note:
Plans have been stamped by CSG.
Environmental Health Services approval required.
Special Inspection is required.
Structural Observation is required.
X Valuation $525,000
Please collect a plan review fee for hour(s) of plan check. Amount:$
Remarks:
From:
Christine Uhalde (B)
Ash Arya, P.E. (S)
CSG Consultants
451997 Page | 1
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
Date:July 16, 2025 Phone: 1.888.794.2016
Job Description:
New 3818sf SFD with 4 bed, 4 bath attached 765sf 2 car garage,
367af covered patio and 367sf roof deck on upper floor.
Email: planreview@csgengr.com
Address:1424 Hansen Ln.
Jurisdiction No.:BLDG-0438-2025
INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW
Please resubmit (3) complete sets of revised hardcopy plans and supporting documents, with responses to the
comment list to the City of San Luis Obispo Building counter. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit
complete sets of revised digital plans and supporting documents, with responses to the comment list to the City of
San Luis Obispo Building counter.
In addition to the below plan check comments, there may be additional comments from other departments and
agencies having jurisdiction for this project (i.e. City of San Luis Obispo Planning, Public Works, Fire Prevention, etc.).
PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
The following comments remain outstanding from the previous plan review. Please provide response to the
comments in bold below.
1. For electronically submitted plans, please resubmit a complete set of plans and documents upon every
resubmittal. Any missing plan sheets, missing stamps and/or signatures (where required) may delay the review
process.
Response: ______________________________________________________________________
2. Submit written responses addressing each plan review comments below and a summary of changes for any
additional modifications. In each response, refer to specific detail or sheet, or specific page of the supporting
documents. Show compliance with all comments within the construction documents.
Response: ______________________________________________________________________
Structural Plan Check Comments by |Ash Arya, asha@csgengr.com|
S1. Update the olde code reference in soil report to the latest cycle in accordance with CBC 2022.
The Geotech consultant may state in their review letter that the recommendation in the old report complies
with CBC 2022.
Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. on plans design criteria notes, in the provided
report or the update is consistent with values used in retaining wall calculations.
PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction.
PC3. Confirm the foundation design parameters in calculations have been coordinated with the initial soil
report. Verify friction per soil report for example
Also see S2 and S3 below.
Response: ______________________________________________________________________
S2. Confirm the application of seismic component of lateral soil pressure on residence rtg walls concurrent with
other load combos.
PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction.
PC3. Response states application of surcharge the comment however is looking for clarification on application
of seismic component. See for instance page 20 of the initial soil report which requires application of
additional 25 pcf for seismic.
451997 Page | 2
Confirm the foundation design parameters in calculations have been coordinated with the initial soil report.
Verify friction per soil report for example.
Response: ______________________________________________________________________
S3. Confirm that footing size, rebar in the 11 ft rtg wall calculations are consistent with plans.
Confirm the foundation design parameters, bearing values, etc. in calculations is coordinated with updated
report.
PC2: Plan check will resume once written responses are provided addressing each correction.
PC3. Confirm the foundation design parameters in calculations have been coordinated with the initial soil
report. Verify friction per soil report for example.
Also see S1 and S2 above.
Response: ______________________________________________________________________
(End of Building Comments)