Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/15/2026 Item 5a, Roberts Jonathan Roberts < To:Advisory Bodies Cc:E-mail Council Website Subject:RE: 2026 Paving Plan - Johnson Ave. Dear Active Transportation Committee, First, I want to sincerely thank you for the work you do and for the service you provide to our community. I am writing regarding the current paving plan, specifically the segment of Johnston Avenue from Bishop Street to San Luis Bay Drive. As you know, this corridor is a critical part of the Safe Routes to School network for the high school. There have been excellent safety improvements along Johnston Avenue from Bishop Street—particularly near Sydney Street—to Orcutt. Vehicle speeds have decreased, and safety for pedestrians and cyclists has been greatly improved. These benefits are largely due to narrowing the roadway and reducing vehicle travel lanes from two in each direction to one. Notably, travel lanes are also reduced to one just past the stop light at San Luis Bay Drive and Johnson Avenue going north. Because of these changes, only a short section of Johnston Avenue still maintains four vehicle travel lanes plus a center turn lane—five lanes total for vehicles—while providing approximately six feet total for bicycles (about three feet on each side which also includes a dangerous/lippy gutter pan) with only a white stripe for protection. This configuration feels inconsistent with the surrounding improvements and with the stated safety goals of the corridor. The vehicle queuing that occurs on Johnston Avenue is minimal and short-lived, primarily during high school drop-off and pick-up times at the beginning and end of the school day. Importantly, this queuing occurs regardless of whether the roadway is configured as one lane or two lanes in each direction, and it lasts for a very limited portion of the day. For the vast majority of the time (during the work day, nights, weekends, holidays, summers), the current wide, vehicle-dominated configuration creates unnecessary risk and does not appear to justify the number of travel lanes provided. Additionally, the section from Bishop Street to the hospital includes four city bus stops—two on each side—for passenger drop-off and pick-up. These locations are currently dangerous for pedestrians, especially those traveling with bicycles as part of their transit commute. In effect, buses are stopping in high-speed, high-conflict areas and depositing passengers into an environment that does not feel safe or well-designed for people on foot or bike. At Laurel Lane, there is also a fire station. Currently, there is no direction from the Laurel Lane fire station in which emergency service vehicles or fire trucks can travel that provides more than a single lane of traffic. The only portion of the surrounding service area that has two lanes of travel is the short stretch from the top of Bishop Street down to the hospital. Given this context, there does not appear to be a compelling operational reason for maintaining multiple vehicle lanes in this segment. 1 I also urge the committee to consider the downhill portion from Bishop Street to the high school, which has a recurring “right-hook” issue. Multiple crashes between cyclists and cars occur in this area every year, often involving children. I respectfully urge the committee to think outside the box, make strong recommendations to the City Council, and take care of our community members. I appreciate the progress that has already been made along Johnston Avenue and ask that this remaining segment be reconsidered through the same safety-focused lens. Further lane reductions and reallocation of space could significantly improve safety, better serve transit users, and more closely align this corridor with Safe Routes to School principles. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jonathan Roberts Former Chair of the Active Transportation Committee Current Varsity High School Mountain Bike Coach (NICA) 805-748-1378 2