HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/15/1992, C-9 - ANHOLM PARK PLAY LOT RENOVATION Illllflfl►►III Illlln , I � � MEETING GATE:
B IIS►►► ��U�` c� o San IS OBispo
ITEM NUMBER
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT zf_
FROM: Wayne A. Peterson, Interim Public rector
PREPARED BY: Lane Wilson, Parks & Buildings Manage
SUBJECT: Anholm Park Play Lot Renovation
CAO RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, reject all bids and direct staff to review the project
and bring back a project within the available $61, 000 (Altern. 2) .
DISCUSSION:
The existing play equipment in this play lot was installed in 1947 .
Time and regular use have taken their toll on the play equipment and
the site. In 1988, the Utilities Department drilled for water and
removed some of the play equipment.
Spurred by the removal of the equipment, the neighbors and a Cal Poly
City & Regional Planning class, under Joe Kourakis, prepared a proposal
for renovation. Casey Patterson worked closely with the neighborhood
to develop an acceptable design. The neighbors have offered to install
the plants and mulch in the planter beds. They will also be involved
helping neighborhood children in the creation of decorative tile as
part of the Art in Public Places requirement.
In July 1992, the City Council approved the plans and specifications
and authorized the soliciting of bids.
Fiscal Impact:
Bids were received on August 2,51 1992 (see attached Bid Summary sheet) .
Serene Construction submitted the low bid of $79, 221. 60 without
additive alternatives. This bid is $18, 221. 00 more than the city
estimate of $61, 000 which include contingencies. The estimate for this
project is low because of last minute requirements that were not
factored into the estimate because of missed communications.
Alternatives:
1. Approve the project as is, accepting Serene's bid.
2. Reject all bids, modify and reduce the project to come within
money available.
Alernative 1 - Approve the project as is, accepting Serene
Construction's bids. This would be the simplest; however, in this time
of fiscal austerity, it is prudent to look at other alternatives as
well, especially with the project being bid above the funds available.
Alternative 2 - Reject all bids. Direct staff to review, modify and
reduce this project to come within money available. The neighbors and
the Parks and Recreation Commission feel that the cost is excessive and
that the project should be reviewed to keep the basic design but to
��!11i7i��►ii�IIIIIIIIII'Il `�u�ll City of san L..Is osispo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Mission Play Lot
Page 2
eliminate the nonessential parts. There is a "can do" attitude and
Greg Macedo has agreed to head up a committee to provide labor for the
park.
All neighbors, the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff are
committed to the project and do not want to see progress come to a halt
when we are so close to having a great remodeled play area.
Attachments: Bid Summary
I
P12y10t.WP/1W#10
y-,2
O O O O O O N O O O O O O N O O O C N
W N m 0 0 0 0 A A N in O O O Q Vf O O N 6
U m m m m 0 0 'U N A N N Q 0 C Nm 4 Q Q
Q e m O m b O m N 0 0 M N N A Q N O
Oa A
M N N N N N M M N M N N M O N N N N
pM N N N
C W O O N 0 0 0 O O 1!f O 0 0 0
C z U_ of 6 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in O O
7 ¢ <
a fm0 N W C m n N Q N m
Q Q m N A N N
O O O O O Om O 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 e
O O O O O O T O O O ppC O m o m O o D 0 m
U m qq Vmf Q O1 m O N a A O m m = N A N m O
C O ¢ _ O N m 0 ^ » N A O N N Q ^ N N N N O
cr
C M N M M N N
O
o VO O o 0 0 0 N O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C W O O O O O O A O Q O O 0O O O O
O U _ m e m OCf m
O 0 Q W O m s N O Q Q N N
Y d N t7 0 0 A
CL_
Y O pp m 0 0 0 m 0 rtf O N O n N O O O m O
O O Q O O O Q m A 0 A O O O m m
y y a W O 0 e A m m Q m O m N O m m v Q of A •
a n N N m A n N 0 N N N N m N N N
N N A N N A m
M N N N M
U �
W e o o Q o 0 o m n o N A n m o o
O ' J F W o O m 0 0 0 m N N 0 n m _ m 0 0
F 1 C j a n P N n n O n N 101
Nl Q O m O PJ A
yyO o N 0 0 0 N 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O
O W J 0 0 P1 O C O O N O A O O O O m O O O O m
W 1. . 0002 = 0800 ;;. . . . . . . . . 0. C G A. b
_ UCC A O Q O O O A O M ,004 m
N O a _ N N _ m N N N N N 0 N N N N
N N N N N A m
10
J Q
Q Z UYY F= U aYO9 0Co AQm 0O Y o 0 0o 0 00 0P0f O00 0i0
0 C 0 N C C
D O 0
a 0N0mN
co W tf
N
W
O N O O 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O O O O O
co S 0 0 0 0 0 C G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
J W C C G C C G C C O G C O O G C C O
Q O
h- CD y a N
U sW N
UJ ~
a
N Z P
W
Z NZ U
Z W W D d
h J
N a
F�
W W= ao a
= n0 e< < < ~
O a n a m p O
O a
Q Z J J J J J J N N N J J LL VJ J O J to J 0 +
O
a
c y
U c Y
LU o m Y d m ' c o a
G
p Y s _
cc E Y $ a N aICUY L a
ul
W Y (y uu cO a a c U c 7 c U
O W
Y
!
D
MEETIN AGENDAS� qq
DATE=ITEM #
September 9, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Pam Voges, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Item C-9: Anholm Park Play Lot Renovation Bids
The bids for Anholm Park (formerly Mission Street) Play Lot Renovation, City Plan No. S-
19Y, Item #C-9, are available in the Council Office for review.
As you know staff is recommending that all bids be rejected and staff be directed to review
the project and return with a project within the available $61,000.
COPIEsTO:
❑•Davew action ❑ FYI
❑ CDD DIP.
O ❑ FIN.DIR
�iACAO ❑ RRE CHIEF
gATTORNEY 13 FW DIP.
"CLERK/ORIC. ❑ POUCECrx
❑ MGMT mm El RDC.DIP.
RJd[IIj