Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6c - Community Partnership Agreement and Grant Agreement for Richetti Fiscalini Ranch Conservation Easement Item 6c Department: Administration Cost Center: 1005 For Agenda of: 4/21/2026 Placement: Consent Estimated Time: N/A FROM: Greg Hermann, Deputy City Manager Prepared By: Robert Hill, Sustainability & Natural Resources Official SUBJECT: COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND GRANT AGREEMENT FOR RIGHETTI FISCALINI RANCH CONSERVATION EASEMENT WITH THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve a Community Partnership Agreement with The Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County; and 2. Approve a Grant Agreement for the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch conservation easement project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to sign the Community Partnership Agreement and the Grant Agreement in a final form satisfactory to the City Attorney. POLICY CONTEXT The City Council set forth a policy for Community Partnerships by Resolution No. 8862 (1998 Series) on October 20, 1998 (Attachment A), with the stated goal to “encourage partnerships with non-profit organizations for the mutual benefit of both the City and the organizations.” Further, the policy also: …directs the City to form community partnerships only with entities that can demonstrate good organization and stability. Non-profits should have a board of directors, and, if funding is involved, must be qualified under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. To assure both parties in the partnership understand their responsibilities and any financial arrangements, the policy requires that a formal agreement be drawn up. If significant funding or significant in-kind support is involved, the agreement will be approved by the City Council. There are numerous policies and programs included in the Conservation and Open Space Element (2006) of the City's General Plan related to open space protection. Most pertinent to this project are Program 8.7.1 (J) and (L) and Policy 9.1.1 (A): 8.7.1 Protect open space resources. The City will take the following actions to protect open space, and will encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to take the same actions within their Page 17 of 370 Item 6c areas of responsibility and jurisdiction: J. Improve interagency cooperation for open space acquisition, greenbelt, creeks, wetlands, and wildlife habitat protection in open space areas by coordinating with other government agencies and organizations having interest or expertise in resource protection. L. Establish mutually respectful, long-term relationships with landowners, and conservation organizations such as land trusts, and local environmental organizations. 9.1.1 (A): Preserve natural and agricultural landscapes. The City will implement the following policies and will encourage other agencies with jurisdiction to do likewise: A. Natural and agricultural landscapes that the City has not designated for urban use shall be maintained in their current patterns of use. The City Council adopted the City of San Luis Obispo 2015 Open Space Maintenance Plan that includes the Technical Appendix: Integrated Vegetation Management Plan for Open Space Lands of the City of San Luis Obispo. This document outlines the City’s approach for invasive species treatment using Integrated Pest Management (IPM) protocols as promulgated by the University of California. This approach is also established in policy in the Conservation and Open Spac e Element (2006): 7.6.1 Environmental toxins The City will avoid the use of synthetic organic chemicals unless there is no practical alternative, and support use of integrated pest management techniques. When the use of a synthetic organic chemical cannot be avoided, the material shall be selective (its effect limited to the target species so far as possible), and it shall be applied selectively. DISCUSSION Background and Community Partnership Agreement The City of San Luis Obispo enjoys a long-standing public-private partnership with The Land Conservancy of San Obispo County (LCSLO) in furtherance of land conservation efforts within the City's Greenbelt. Over the course of this nearly thirty-year relationship, the City has partnered on numerous planning and land protection efforts, including the Stenner Springs Natural Reserve, Maino Open Space, and Bowden Ranch Open Space acquisitions, as well as the Guidetti Ranch, Stenner Ranch, Brughelli Ranch, and O'Connor Ranch conservation easements, together with numerous other successful projects including land restoration and land management activities. In summary, the partnership provides capacity building, fundraising, technical expertise, and relationships that are of significant benefit to the City. The purposes of the Community Partnership Agreement are two-fold. The first is to formally Page 18 of 370 Item 6c document the partnership and recognize the mutual benefits and accomplishments of both the City and LCSLO over the course of over 30 years of working together. The second purpose is to ensure that the required elements of a community partnership, per the 1998 policy, are in place given the size and complexity of the projects and the associated need for clear roles and responsibilities and strong governance; fiscal responsibility and oversight; liability, indemnity and insurance; and, appropriate contractual agreements and purchasing authorities on a project-by-project basis. Current Funding Requests LCSLO has reached an agreement to purchase a conservation easement interest in the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch, located in the northeast portion of the City's Greenbelt. On March 30, 2026, the City received a letter from LCSLO requesting consideration of funding in the amount of $65,000 towards the purchase of the conservation easement interest. LCSLO has secured a primary grant from the State of California Department of Conservation's Sustainable Agriculture Land Conservation Program, as well as other private donations, and would have all of the necessary funding to complete the transaction should Council approve the request. The appraised value for the subject conservation easement is $2,390,000. As stated in LCSLO’s letter, the property description and articulation of conservation values are as follows: The Righetti Fiscalini Ranch is a prominent part of the southern San Luis Obispo Greenbelt and is visible from many City vantage points and open space areas. Two seasonal streams converge on the ranch which ultimately feed into San Luis Obispo Creek. Wildlife including black bears and various raptor species are frequently observed on the property. The ranch’s current agricultural uses include approximately 91 acres of avocado orchard and 55 acres of vineyard. The proposed conservation easement will permanently protect these scenic, environmental, and agricultural conservation values by restricting development to one potential future single residence within a defined building enve lope. Additional restrictions will prohibit future subdivision, intensive non-agricultural land uses, activities that lead to soil erosion, unnecessary removal of native vegetation, and other perpetual land use restrictions. These restrictions will ensure the conservation values of the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch are protected in perpetuity. See Attachment B, Draft Grant Agreement, and Attachment C, LCSLO Funding Request Letter. The City has also solicited a proposal from LCSLO for invasive species treatment s at a suite of City open space properties, including Bishop Peak, Irish Hills, Stenner Springs and South Hills Natural Reserves, as well as Miossi Open Space. The priority species identified for treatment are yellow-star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis), wooly distaff thistle (Carthamus lanatus), jubata grass (Cortaderia jubata), and stinkwort (Dittrichia graveolens). These species carry a ranking of “high” or “alert” from the California Invasive Species Council, meaning that they have the capability to impact ecosystem processes, impact other plant communities, and impact genetic integrity, as well as possessing high Page 19 of 370 Item 6c rates of spread with no management, innate reproductive potential, and potential of human-caused or natural long-distance dispersal, among other risk-based evaluative parameters. Over the years, the City has sought LCSLO’s services due to their intimate knowledge of City open space locations and habitats, decades of invasive species-specific experience, and specialized licensing and credentials (e.g. pest control applicator’s license, qualified applicator license). As the City moves towards increased management actions attendant to reducing wildland fire risk, it is anticipated that invasive species treatments will play an important role. This is because some of the priority species are highly flammable in and of themselves (pampas grass) while others have the capability of converting grassland systems to the point where livestock grazing as a fuel reduction management strategy is much less viable because species such as yellow star thistle and distaff thistle are unpalatable to livestock grazing animals. The current scope of work and budget provided by LCSLO following coordination with City staff is $43,155. Previous Council Direction City Council’s most recent notable action related to land protection within the San Luis Obispo Greenbelt is the adoption of the Major City Goal (MCG) for Open Space, Climate Action, and Resilience included with the 2025-27 Financial Plan, including these goals: 4 – Protect, sustain and advance open space and natural and historic resources a. Pursue priority land conservation opportunities to expand the Greenbelt, identify funding opportunities and resources, and engage with priority landowners on an annual basis 2 – Implement disaster mitigation efforts to reduce risks from flood and fires b. Treat at least 25 acres of vegetative fuels in high wildfire risk areas of City creeks and Open Space Public Engagement The Major City Goal strategy to protect and maintain open space is reflective of extensive public engagement during the 2025-27 Financial Plan process, including the Community Forum, Goal Setting Workshop, numerous survey and public input opportunities, Strategic Budget Direction, and the final adoption of the Financial Plan itself. Any member of the public may put forward either written or verbal comments to the City Council pertaining to this agenda item. CONCURRENCE The Community Development Department concurs with the recommended action due to the role of the proposed Conservation Easement in service of implementing the Land Use Element (2014) of the City's General Plan. The City’s Ranger Service and the Fire Department ’s Emergency Management personnel support the treatment of invasive species within City open space to reduce the risk of wildland fires. Page 20 of 370 Item 6c ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The recommended action to provide grant funding for the purchase of a conservation easement is not considered a Project under the California Environmental Quality A ct. Further, the acquisition of a conservation easement is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it involves "acquisition of lands for fish and wildlife conservation purposes including (a) preservation of fish and wildlife habitat..." (CEQA Guidelines § 15313), and because it involves the "acceptance of ... easement interests in order to maintain the open space character of the area" (CEQA Guidelines§ 15317). The City also recently completed registration with the State of California pursuant to the Governor’s executive order and its CEQA Suspension process for projects that reduce the risk of wildfire (Secretarial Suspension Authorization, Project ID: 3c76408c-c831- 40e7-85e6-8283a118f7b9, “City of San Luis Obispo Hazardous Fuels Reduction and Wildfire Prevention Project”). This approval specifically covers invasive species treatment actions in the locations identified under the proposed scope of work. Project activities will need to comply with the Statewide Fuels Reduction Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) following submittal of a Notice of Commencement specifying the date and location where activities will actually take place. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2025-26 Funding Identified: Yes Fiscal Analysis: Righetti Fiscalini Ranch Conservation Easement – In-Lieu Funds Funding Sources Total Budget Available Current Funding Request Remaining Balance Annual Ongoing Cost General Fund State Federal Fees Other: Avila Ranch In-Lieu Open Space Funds $603,500 $65,000 $538,500 N/A Total $603,500 $65,000 $538,500 N/A Page 21 of 370 Item 6c Invasive Species Treatments - Open Space Maintenance CIP Funding Sources Total Budget Available Current Funding Request Remaining Balance Annual Ongoing Cost General Fund $213,221 $43,155 $170,066 N/A State Federal Fees Other: Total $213,221 $43,155 $170,066 N/A As part of the Development Agreement and conditions of approval for the Avila Ranch project, the City collected a total of $603,500 as an in -lieu payment to offset open space impacts and conversion of agricultural soils that occurred at the project site. The Avila Ranch project will dedicate agricultural open space land on-site, and the in-lieu funds represent the off-site requirement that could not be completed within the project boundary. The funds should be spent within the San Luis Obispo Greenbelt and should be used for conservation projects with an agriculture nexus. Per the draft Grant Agreement, the City’s funds would be sent directly to escrow with instruction to be used if, and only if, the escrow officer ha s all other funds on hand and is in position to record the Deed of Conservation Easement. Because LCSLO is responsible for easement administration and annual monitoring, the annual ongoing cost to the City is negligible. The Open Space Maintenance CIP is used for a broad variety of activities outlined in the City of San Luis Obispo 2015 Open Space Maintenance Plan, including invasive species treatment activities. A total of $213,221 is currently available to support the funding request of $43,155. Ongoing costs are difficult to determine; in some cases, a single treatment may be effective while in other cases a treatment area may need multiple visits based on the management objective (e.g. eradication, perimeter control) and variable field conditions in the future based on timing and amount of seasonal rainfall. In any case, follow-up treatments would be the subject to a future scope of work and funding availability. This funding request would be enabled through the City’s standard purchase requisition and purchase order process. ALTERNATIVES Council may request changes to either the draft Community Partnership Agreement or the draft Grant Agreement. Council could also elect to fund only the conservation easement or only the invasive species treatment work described herein, or fund either of the projects at a lesser amount. Council could choose not to approve any of the recommended actions. Should Council direct an alternative that requires staff to return at a later time, a “date certain” should be identified that works with LCSLO’s acquisition schedule and timing for the conservation easement project. Page 22 of 370 Item 6c ATTACHMENTS A - Community Partnership and Foundation Policy and Resolution No. 8862 (1998 Series) B - Draft Community Partnership Agreement C - Draft Grant Agreement D - LCSLO Funding Request Letter - Righetti Fiscalini Ranch Conservation Easement Page 23 of 370 Page 24 of 370 council o,zo_ j acEnaa Repoin H CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: Ken Hampian,Assistant City Administrative Officerl Prepared By: Wendy George,Assistant to the City Administrative Officer tr Paul LeSage,Parks and Recreation Director a SUBJECT: COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AND FOUNDATION POLICY CAO RECOMMENDATION 1) Adopt a resolution approving a Community Partnership and Foundation Policy. 2) Adopt a resolution endorsing a Community Recreation and Parks Foundation, subject to receipt of its 501(c) non-profit status, the formation of a board of directors and approval of proposed by-laws. DISCUSSION Background During the goal setting process for the 1997-99 Financial Plan, the Council created a goal to encourage partnerships with non-profit organizations for the mutual benefit of both the City and the organizations." In considering this goal, the Council recognized that the possibilities for such partnerships and foundations are wide-ranging and could also create competition with other local non-profit agencies. Therefore, staff was directed to develop procedures for establishing them in a well-defined, logical way, based on a full understanding of the implications involved. In order to fulfill this direction, staff surveyed a number of other public agencies and gathered information about the types of partnerships and level of governmental support involved. . The results of this survey were presented to the City Council at its January 13, 1998, meeting. Following a discussion of the information provided, the City Council directed staff to develop a community partnership policy which addresses establishing partnerships for specific City-related projects and the formation of a Parks and Recreation Foundation. Staff was asked to include the following areas in the policy: Guidelines for the level of"seed"money to be provided to a partner. Guidelines for the level of"in-kind" support to be provided to a partner. The type of formal agreement which must be developed with a partner. Requirements which a partner must meet to prevent the City from assuming additional liability. Methods of publicizing the City's interest in developing community partnerships. The level of direct City involvement with a City-endorsed foundation. Parameters for a City-endorsed foundation which would prevent it from competing with other non-profit organizations. Page 25 of 370 Council Agenda Report-Community Partnership and Foundation Policy Page 2 Community Partnerships The proposed Community Partnership and Foundation Policy (Attachment 1) is divided into two sections. The first addresses partnerships and the second addresses City-endorsed foundations. In developing the section on partnerships, it became quickly apparent that it would be difficult to create hard and fast rules relating to the types of programs, projects and activities that would be appropriate for partnerships. Instead, the policy sets forth evaluation criteria, such as the level of public benefit offered by the partnership, the extent to which a partnership will help advance existing City goals and the cost-effectiveness of the partnership. These criteria can then be used on a case-by-case basis to evaluate the appropriateness of a given partnership. The policy also directs the City to form community partnerships only with entities that can demonstrate good organization and stability. Non-profits should have a board of directors, and, if funding is involved, must be qualified under Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. To assure that both parties in the partnership understand their responsibilities and any financial arrangements, the policy requires that a formal agreement be drawn up. If significant funding or significant in-kind support is involved, the agreement will be approved by the City Council. Otherwise, the City Administrative Officer may provide approval. The agreement will also protect the City from liability by providing indemnification and requiring the partner to be properly insured. Similar to the issue of trying to succinctly define appropriate types of partnerships, it was difficult for staff to provide specific parameters on the level or type of City support, given the variety of possibilities. However, the policy does provide a general guideline that it is reasonable to expect the City and the partner(s) to share the cost equally. It finther states that this ratio could vary depending on the cost of the program/project, the resources of the partner(s) and the degree of interest on the part of the City. The policy also assures that the potential impact on other existing City services and priorities will be considered when determining the level of the City's in-kind commitment. In order for partnerships to become one of the City's standard problem-solving tools, we propose to send copies of the approved policy to all non-profit organizations within the City. Staff will also consider and, when appropriate, recommend partnerships as a way of completing City programs, projects and activities that would otherwise lack sufficient funding for completion. The community will also be encouraged to consider partnerships when advocating to the City for the initiation of new programs or projects. (For example,as part of the bi-annual goal setting process.) City-Endorsed Foundations The second section of the policy addresses what we are now calling "City-endorsed foundations". Attachment 1). We believe this is a more appropriate description than the term "City foundation", which was used during earlier discussions of this issue. These are foundations that are not formed directly by the City, but ones whose efforts the City sanctions; and for which the City may provide limited formation assistance, such as reviewing proposed by-laws to assure their compatibility with City interests. Prior to the City offering such recognition, the proposed foundation will be evaluated to assure that it will not compete for resources that are currently supporting other non- Page 26 of 370 Council Agenda Report-Community Partnership and Foundation Policy Page 3 profit activities in the community. Endorsed foundations must be qualified under Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code and have by-laws that clearly state their purposes. The policy requires formal action by the City Council to affect endorsement. The purpose of a City-endorsed foundation is to assist members of the community in raising funds for a particular program area that is of benefit to the City. Funds may be used for the construction or improvement of facilities, purchases of equipment, development of innovative programs and scholarships or other forms of financial assistance. Funds may be granted by the foundation to the City or to other community organizations that provide services or opportunities within the foundation's program area. The policy provides very specific restrictions on fundraising, which must be followed by any foundation wishing City endorsement. They shall not: Accept funds that simply redistribute existing community resources. Compete against other local non-profit organizations for funds that they have formerly received. Undertake a general fundraising campaign. All fundraising must be directed toward a specific purpose. Allocate funds other than to the specific stated purpose of the fundraising. Proposed San Luis Obispo Community Recreation and Parks Foundation Staff recommends that the City Council endorse the formation of a Community Recreation and Parks Foundation that will benefit all of the organizations that provide leisure services. As defined in the organization's proposed by-laws,the Foundation would: Assist members of the community in raising funds for construction of new recreation facilities, improvements of existing facilities, purchase of equipment, development of innovative recreation programs and scholarships. Obtain grants from other non-profit foundations. The proposed Community Recreation and Parks foundation will meet the guidelines of the Council relating to City-endorsed foundations. A set of bylaws (Attachment 3)has already been developed. Once a conditional endorsement is received from the City, a board of directors will be formed, based on the by-laws, and the organization will apply for its 501(c)non-profit status. The Foundation will be careful not to undertake any activity that is contrary to the goals and purposes of the various organizations that provide recreation and park services within the San Luis Obispo community. To ensure this,the board will appoint ex-officio advisory board members from these organizations. The Foundation will not accept funding that merely redistributes existing community resources, nor will it undertake a general fundraising campaign. Funds raised will be used only for the specific activity for which they are intended. Page 27 of 370 Council Agenda Report-Community Partnership and Foundation Policy Page 4 Because of the community nature of this Foundation, all local recreation and park agencies can become active partners under its umbrella This can lead to other successful partnerships similar to the Santa Rosa Skate Park and the Mayor's Youth Task Force. It is likely that a small amount of staff time will be needed initially to assist with the organization of the Foundation. That time commitment will decrease as the Foundation board of directors becomes active. Many local citizens are already aware of the proposed Foundation and have expressed an interest in serving on the board. CONCURRENCES The Parks and Recreation Commission endorses the formation of a Community Recreation and Parks Foundation. The San Luis Obispo YMCA concurs with the formation of a Community Recreation and Parks Foundation,with the understanding that they will become an active partner in it. The Field Users Task Force has also been apprised of the Community Recreation and Parks Foundation and has expressed its support. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City created by the establishment of a Community Partnership and Foundation Policy. Implementation of the policy has the potential to provide considerable outside financial support or cost savings to the City, but will also require the potential investment of funds and manpower on the part of the City. The net fiscal impact to the City will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Attachments 1 -Resolution approving the Community Partnership and Foundation Policy 2 -Resolution approving the City Endorsement of a Parks and Recreation Foundation 3 -Community Recreation and Parks Foundation By-Laws S—Page 28 of 370 Attachement 1 city of San lulS OBISPO community pantnEnship and foundation policy Purpose. There are many programs, projects and activities which are of interest to the City and the community,but cannot be addressed directly due to limitations on the City's human or financial resources. However, in keeping with the City's tradition of citizen involvement, City resources can be used in partnership with others to create opportunities for otherwise unfeasible projects or programs. The City encourages the formation of such community partnerships whenever possible. Under certain limited conditions the City will also consider endorsing the establishment of a foundation to encourage public contributions and grant funding for specific purposes that affect City programs. Both partnerships and foundations can be methods for the public to become more involved in creating the quality of life that is so special to the residents. A few examples of some successful City partnerships are: Performing Arts Center DARE Program Prado Day Center Santa Rosa Park roller hockey rink STAR At-Risk Program Creek Stewardship Program I. COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS Eligible Programs, Projects and Activities. On occasion, the City may propose a partnership with another community organization. More often, however, partnerships with the City are proposed by community organizations wishing.to initiate or enhance certain programs, projects or activities of special interest to them. In judging whether or not to participate in such partnerships,the City will consider such things as: The level of public benefit offered by the partnership; The extent to which such a partnership will help advance existing City goals; Whether or not the partnership will help meet a currently unmet community need; The potential success and cost-effectiveness of the proposed partnership strategy; Whether or not the City is the appropriate public agency partner(or if another agency would be more appropriate). Eligible Community Partners. The City shall only form community partnerships with entities that can demonstrate good organization and stability throughout the term of the partnership. Non-profit organizations should have a board of directors and, if funding is 1 S-7Page 29 of 370 to be received from the City, must be qualified under Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. If no funding is to be received from the City, official non-profit status is not required. Community Partnership Agreement. All community partnerships require a formal agreement between the City and the partner(s). The agreement shall clearly define the purpose of the partnership, the City's responsibilities, the partner(s)' responsibilities, the level of in-kind (e.g., labor and materials) and direct financial support the City shall contribute, the level of in-kind or financial support the partner(s) shall contribute, any reporting responsibilities the partner(s) shall have and any other operational details relevant to the purpose of the partnership. The City's standard contract agreement format shall be used to document the partnership. If City funding, or significant in-kind support is to be provided, or the purposes of the partnership could have major community impact, the partnership agreement shall be approved by the City Council. Other agreements may generally be approved by the City Administrative Officer. Level and Type of City Support. Because there is such a diversity in the nature of potential partnerships, it is difficult to establish rigid parameters for an appropriate level of City support. As a general guideline, it is reasonable to expect the City and the partner(s) shall each contribute half the cost toward a community partnership. However, this ratio could vary depending upon the program/project cost, resources of the partner(s) and level of interest on the part of the City. In-kind contributions shall be counted, as well as actual cash, in calculating the total contribution of the parties. Once agreement is reached on the levels of contribution by the parties, it will be documented in the partnership agreement. The level of in-kind support to be committed from the City, particularly the amount of staff support, shall be determined based on work load considerations and the potential impact on other existing City services and priorities. In particular, before the commitment of financial or in-kind support which cannot be easily accommodated within existing departmental budgets, the availability of additional funding must be determined. Examples: The City and the Central Coast Women's League form a partnership to enhance the existing skate park The total cost of the enhancements is anticipated to be $40,000. Each party commits to contributing $20,000 either in cash or in a combination of "in- kind"services, e.g. volunteer or staff labor, and cash. The City and Friends of Las Casas de Adobe (FOCA)form a partnership to rehabilitate the three City-owned adobes. The total cost of the project is anticipated $1.2 million. The parties agree that the City will provide $25,000 in "seed money"from the General Fund to allow FOCA to perform initial studies and establish fundraising mechanisms. In addition the City agrees to provide certain assistance, such as tree trimming, and to approve other sources offunding such as the Community Development Block Grant. The City's funding commitment is documented in the partnership agreement. The Friends of Las Casas de Adobe are responsible for the remainingfunding. 2 s 8Page 30 of 370 Organizations which are formally approved partners of the City may be eligible for certain benefits which are not normally made available to other groups. For example, use of City equipment, such as the trolley or portable toilets, may be approved on a case-by- case basis for official City partners. Indemnification and Liability Insurance. Any partner(s) shall agree to indemnify the City against all claims or actual liability arising out of the partnership. The City's standard indemnification language shall be included in the partnership agreement. Any partner(s) shall provide proof of insurance in accordance with the City's standard Insurance Requirements for Contractors. Exceptions to the insurance requirements shall be approved by the Risk Manager. Promotion of Community Partnership Opportunities. Partnerships have become a part of the City's standard set of problem solving tools, and this formalized policy shall be made available to non-profit organizations within the community. In addition to being receptive to partnerships proposed by such organizations, staff shall also consider, and when appropriate recommend,partnerships as a way of completing City programs, projects and activities that otherwise lack sufficient funding. The community will also be encouraged to suggest potential partnership strategies when advocating to the City Council for the initiation of new programs,projects, and activities(i.e. during the bi- annual goal setting process). II. CITY-ENDORSED FOUNDATIONS Formation of Community Foundations. The formation of community foundations has become a way of tapping into new resources to support programs, projects, and activities that benefit the public. While the City will not directly form such a foundation, under certain conditions the City might endorse and assist in such efforts. In addition to assuring public benefit, one key condition prior to endorsement or assistance is that the proposed foundation is not being formed to compete for resources presently supporting other non-profit activities in the community. Endorsement shall be by the City Council, and forms of assistance provided by City staff shall be advisory only, such as reviewing proposed bylaws to assure compatibility with City conditions and interests. Purposes of a City-Endorsed Foundation. A City-endorsed foundation's purpose shall be to assist members of the community in raising funds for a particular program area that is of benefit to the City, for example recreation and parks. Funds may be used for the construction of new facilities, improvements of existing facilities, purchase of equipment, development of innovative programs or providing scholarships or financial assistance to program participants. Funds may be granted by the foundation to City departments or programs, as well as to other organizations within the community which provide services or opportunities within the given program area. 3 S-9Page 31 of 370 The Endorsement Process. Endorsement of a local foundation shall be given by the City Council through the adoption of a resolution. In order to consider the appropriateness of an endorsement,the following will be considered: Non-profit status. The foundation must be qualified under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. By-laws. A City-endorsed Foundation shall have formal by-laws which clearly state the purpose of the foundation and provide operational directives which assure that the foundation will satisfactorily meet the conditions of this policy. Board of Directors. City employees shall not serve on the board of directors of a City-endorsed foundation. However, as appropriate, City employees may serve in an advisory capacity to the board of directors. Fiscal Provisions. A City-endorsed foundation shall not accept fimds that simply redistribute existing community resources. A City-endorsed foundation shall avoid competing against other local non- profit organizations for funds that have typically gone to these other community organizations. A City-endorsed foundation shall not undertake a general fundraising campaign. All fundraising shall be directed toward a particular defined purpose. A City-endorsed foundations primary source of fimds shall be through the solicitation of grants, donations and bequests and the conducting of special fundraising events for a particular purpose. A City-endorsed foundation shall allocate all funds raised to the particular program,activity or facility stated to be the purpose for the fundraising. 4 S-/oPage 32 of 370 RESOLUTION NO. 8862 (1998 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AND FOUNDATION POLICY WHEREAS, there are many programs, projects and activities which are of interest to the City and the community, but cannot be addressed directly due to limitations on the City's human or financial resources; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has a tradition of citizen involvement in its programs, projects and activities; and WHEREAS, City resources can be used in partnership with others to create opportunities for otherwise unfeasible projects or programs; and WHEREAS, under certain limited conditions the City and community can also benefit from the establishment of a foundation to encourage public contributions and grant funding for specific purposes that affect City programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: The City of San Luis Obispo Community Partnership and Foundation Policy found in Attachment 1 is hereby approved. Upon motion ofCouncil Member Williams , seconded by vice Mayor Romero , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Schwartz, Romero, Williams, Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Roalman the foregoing resolution was adopted this 2 n day of nr rnh,, '1998. YAao Mayor Allen Se e R8862Page 33 of 370 Resolution No. 8862 (1998 Series) Page 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 34 of 370 COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY This COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as the Agreement, is made and entered into in the City of San Luis Obispo on _______ by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “CITY”), and LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a California non-profit organization (hereinafter referred to as “LCSLO”). The CITY and LCSLO are individually referred to as a “party” or collectively as the “parties”. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY and LCSLO have a long-standing public / private partnership stretching over thirty years where the two entities have engaged in mutually beneficial community projects including conservation planning efforts, land conservation projects, land and stream restoration projects; an historic preservation project; public engagement and education; and, community awareness and fundraising for one another’s projects; and WHEREAS, select examples of such projects include the Saving Special Places conservation plans; acquisition and / or conservation easements at Maino Open Space, Stenner Springs Natural Reserve, Bowden Ranch Open Space, Froom Ranch Open Space, and, most recently, Dixon Ranch; wetland and floodplain enhancement at Filipponi Ecological Reserve, numerous fish passage improvement projects along Prefumo Creek, Stenner Creek, and San Luis Obispo Creek; ongoing invasive species treatment work and participation and support for the Octagon Barn Center and Bob Jones Pathway, among many other endeavors between CITY and LCSLO; and WHEREAS, CITY’s 2025-27 Financial Plan feature a Major City Goal work plan for Open Space, Climate Action, and Resilience, including section 4 “Protect, sustain and advance open space and natural and historic resources” with sub-section 4. being most pertinent “Pursue priority land conservation opportunities to expand the Greenbelt, identify funding opportunities and resources, and engage with priority landowners on an annual basis”; and WHEREAS, LCSLO has set forth a request for CITY to participate in funding a currently active conservation easement project, and CITY has solicited a proposal from LCSLO for its services in providing invasives species treatments within CITY open space property; and WHEREAS, the CITY desires to maintain a mutually beneficial relationship between the CITY and LCSLO to advance open space protection and land stewardship goals; and WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that partnerships with community organizations to provide shared services to the community are of great benefit and LCSLO has expressed a willingness to continue these shared services, in partnership and in cooperation with CITY; and WHEREAS, LCSLO is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and is uniquely qualified to provide the services contemplated under this Agreement due to its more than 40 years of experience delivering conservation planning and land protection projects, as well as its extensive experience, credentials, and professional licenses related to land restoration and invasive species treatment projects within the San Luis Obispo Greenbelt. Page 35 of 370 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. TERM. The duration of this Agreement shall be for a period of approximately three (3) years, commencing on April 21, 2026 and continuing to June 30, 2029 (the “Term”), which may be extended upon the mutual written agreement of the parties. 2. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. Initially, the CITY and LCSLO intend to engage in certain projects relating to land protection and land restoration and invasive species treatment and in connection therewith the parties intend to implement those projects in accordance with the financial terms outlined in Section 2.1, below. 2.1 PAYMENT TO LCSLO. The CITY shall provide funding to LCSLO for certain known project efforts, described below: A. CITY will provide matching grant funds in the amount of $65,000 for LCSLO’s Righetti-Fiscalini Ranch project. CITY and LCSLO shall enter into a separate grant agreement (the “Righetti-Fiscalini Grant Agreement”), which shall provide that the CITY’s funds will be delivered directly to an account established for the transaction upon notification from LCSLO. The terms of the Righetti-Fiscalini Grant Agreement shall be subject to the mutual written approval by the CITY and LCSLO. B. CITY has requested LCSLO’s services for invasive species treatment work at various CITY open space properties. CITY shall issue a Purchase Order (the “City Purchase Order”) in the amount of $43,155 pursuant to LCSLO’s proposal and scope of work, which shall be incorporated into the City Purchase Order. CITY shall remit payment to LCSLO on a reimbursable basis upon receipt of periodic invoices from LCSLO in accordance with the City Purchase Order. The City Purchase Order shall be subject to the mutual written approval by the CITY and LCSLO. 3. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The CITY’s Sustainability & Natural Resources Official may authorize minor modifications from time to time within the scope of their financial and/or operational authority, to the Roles and Responsibilities as they may deem necessary or appropriate to the partnership between the CITY and LCSLO. Any material amendment or modifications to the Roles and Responsibilities shall be upon mutual written consent of both parties, in accordance with paragraph 6, below. A. SCOPE OF SERVICES i. Both parties agree to collaborate on the land conservation and land restoration projects identified at paragraph 2.1, above. ii. Both parties will consider prospective additional project opportunities as they arise during the Term of this Agreement. Any additional project opportunities that CITY and LCSLO elect to pursue together under this Agreement shall be subject to available funding and staff resources of each of the parties and would be facilitated and administered through an appropriate contractual agreement or purchasing method. Through this Agreement, it is CITY’s express intent to identify LCSLO as a preferred partner and vendor for project activities as described herein. iii. CITY and LCSLO staff will meet and coordinate project administration and implementation on an as-needed basis. Page 36 of 370 B. CITY OBLIGATIONS i. CITY will be available for monthly reoccurring meetings, or as needed, with LCSLO during the Term. ii. CITY shall remit approved payments to LCSLO as outlined and in accordance with the Righetti-Fiscalini Grant Agreement and City Purchase Order described above. iii. CITY shall provide administrative support for grant management and reporting. iv. CITY shall coordinate timing and access to CITY’s open space properties where invasive species treatments will occur. v. CITY will coordinate with LCSLO on any press releases, media, or public communications related to the Scope of Services. C. LCSLO OBLIGATIONS i. LCSLO will be available for monthly reoccurring meetings, or as needed, with CITY during the Term. ii. LCSLO will dutifully carry out the Scope of Services. iii. LCSLO shall submit requests for payment or periodic invoices to CITY as outlined and in accordance with the Righetti-Fiscalini Grant Agreement and City Purchase Order described above. iv. LCSLO shall provide CITY with a copy of the recorded Deed of Conservation Easement upon completion of the Righetti-Fiscalini project and carry out the perpetual duties of monitoring and enforcement of the Righetti-Fiscalini conservation easement interest. v. LCSLO shall provide notification of timing and access to CITY’s open space properties where invasive species treatments will occur. vi. LCSLO shall at all times maintain its 501(c)3 non-profit status 4. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This written Agreement, including all writings specifically incorporated herein by reference, shall constitute the complete agreement between the parties hereto. No oral agreement, understanding or representation not reduced to writing and specifically incorporated herein shall be of any force or effect, nor shall any such oral agreement, understanding or representation be binding upon the parties hereto. 5. AGREEMENT TERMINATION. Either party may terminate the Agreement for convenience provided that 30 days written notice is given. The Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause, provided that written notice has been given in the manner specified herein stating the reasons for the intended termination and providing the other party at least 10 days to cure any alleged breach. If the party receiving notice fails or refuses to cure the alleged breach within 10 days, or to make substantial progress toward cure to the satisfaction of the party demanding cure, this Agreement may be terminated 10 days after receipt of the notice as specified herein. 6. AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS. Except as otherwise stated in Section 3 of this Agreement, any amendment, modification or variation from the terms of this Agreement shall be presented in writing by CITY and / or LCSLO and shall be effective only upon final written approval by an authorized representative of each of the parties. 7. INSURANCE AND LIABILITY A. Each party to this Agreement shall make the other party, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as separately additionally insured through a CG 20 26 or equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy no later than October 1 of Page 37 of 370 each year. Each party agrees to provide commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00-01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability. B. Each party agrees to provide a minimum liability and property damage insurance coverage of one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Each party shall maintain worker’s compensation insurance at a level that is consistent with state law requirements. 8. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION A. CITY agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold LCSLO and its agents, officers and employees harmless from and against any and all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to LCSLO’s employees, agents, officers or volunteers, which arise from or are connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of the CITY, and its agents, officers, employees or volunteers, in performing its responsibilities hereunder, and all expenses of investigating and defending against same; provided, however, that the CITY duty to indemnify and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of LCSLO , its agents, officers, employees or volunteers. B. LCSLO agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold the CITY and its agents, officers and employees harmless from and against any and all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to the CITY employees, agents, officers or volunteers, which arise from or are connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of LCSLO, and its agents, officers, employees or volunteers, in performing its responsibilities hereunder, and all expenses of investigating and defending against same; provided, however, that LCSLO’s duty to indemnify and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its agents, officers, employees or volunteers 9. NOTICE. All written notices to the parties hereto shall be sent by USPS Mail, postage prepaid by registered or certified mail addressed as follows: CITY: City Manager City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 LCSLO: Executive Director Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County 1137 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Notices given pursuant to this section shall be deemed effective five (5) calendar days after deposit with USPS Mail. Either party may change its address for notices from time to time by giving written notice of such change in accordance with this section. Page 38 of 370 11. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. Both CITY and LCSLO do covenant that each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute agreements for their party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: ________________________________ ________________________________ Teresa Purrington Erica Stewart City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: LAND CONSERVANCY SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: ________________________________ J. Christine Dietrick Kaila Adriane Dettman Hooker City Attorney Executive Director Page 39 of 370 Page 40 of 370 GRANT AGREEMENT FOR RIGHETTI FISCALINI RANCH CONSERVATION EASEMENT ACQUISITION THIS Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made on ___________________________ by the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (“CITY”) and THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY (“LAND CONSERVANCY”) who are collectively referred to as the “Parties”. RECITALS WHEREAS, LAND CONSERVANCY has reached an agreement with the Righetti Family to acquire a Conservation Easement interest (the “Conservation Easement”) in land commonly known as the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch, thereby ensuring the preservation of approximately two-hundred acres of real property (the “Property”) located within CITY’s established Greenbelt boundary, which Property is identified as San Luis Obispo County Assessor Parcel Number 044-051-028; and WHEREAS, both CITY and LAND CONSERVANCY desire to ensure the preservation of the Property consistent with goals and policies set forth in CITY’s Conservation and Open Space Element of its General Plan pertaining to protection of wildlife corridors and contiguous habitat, as well as to protect the scenic, open space, and agricultural values of the Property in perpetuity; and WHEREAS, the appraised value for the Conservation Easement is $2,390,000.00 pursuant to a qualified independent appraisal; and WHEREAS, CITY, in consideration of a request from LAND CONSERVANCY, and of the Parties’ mutual goals and long-standing partnership in land conservation, desires to make a grant in the amount of $65,000.00 towards the purchase price of the Conservation Easement; and WHEREAS, LAND CONSERVANCY has secured a primary grant from the State of California Department of Conservation’s Sustainable Agriculture Land Conservation Program, as well as other private donations, that will provide the remaining funds needed to complete the transaction and provide for the long-term monitoring and stewardship of the Conservation Easement; and WHEREAS, LAND CONSERVANCY will enter into to the Conservation Easement subject to certain contractual requirements by the State of California Department of Conservation that include various protective measures to ensure that the purposes of public expenditures of funds are adhered to and carried out in perpetuity; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises herein and the mutual benefits accruing to the Parties, and to the general public from the acquisition of the Conservation Easement exclusively for conservation purposes as contemplated herein, CITY and LAND CONSERVANCY hereby agree as follows: Page 41 of 370 A. The Recitals herein are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. B. CITY shall make a grant of funds to LAND CONSERVANCY in the amount of $65,000.00 which shall be deposited to an escrow account at First American Title Company that has been established for the benefit of this transaction, upon LAND CONSERVANCY’s written request made at least 14 days in advance to do so. C. CITY’s funds shall only be used if, and only if, all other funds are deposited to escrow and the Conservation Easement Deed that will encumber the Property is duly executed, notarized, and recorded with the San Luis Obispo County Clerk / Recorder. If the transaction is substantially delayed or does not take place for any reason whatsoever, then LAND CONSERVANCY shall cause First American Title Company to promptly return the funds to CITY. D. LAND CONSERVANCY, or its successors and assigns, shall hold all right, privilege and interests accruing from ownership of the Conservation Easement in perpetuity. STANDARD PROVISIONS 1. Amendments CITY and LAND CONSERVANCY may amend this Agreement at any time provided that such amendments make specific reference to this Agreement, and are executed in writing, signed by a duly authorized representative of each organization, and approved by the City Manager. Such amendments will not invalidate this Agreement, nor relieve or release the CITY or LAND CONSERVANCY from its obligations under this Agreement, except as expressly provided in writing in any subsequent amendments. 2. Financial Assurance CITY reserves the right to request copies of invoices, account statements, or audits of LAND CONSERVANCY’s financial records pertinent to this Agreement. LAND CONSERVANCY shall at all times maintain its 501(c)3 non-profit status. 3. Civil Rights Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no person will, on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, sex or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 No person in the United States will on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, sex or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this title. Page 42 of 370 Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as Amended No person will be excluded from participation, denied program benefits, or subjected to discrimination on the basis of age under any program or activity receiving federal funding assistance. (42 U.S.C. 610 et. seq.) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as Amended No otherwise qualified individual will, solely by reason or his or her disability, be excluded from participation (including employment), denied program benefits, or subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal funds. (29 U.S.C. 794) Public Law 101-336, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Subject to the provisions of this title, no qualified individual with a disability will, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity. 4. Assignability LAND CONSERVANCY will not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. 5. Conflict of Interest No member of the CITY’s governing body and no other public official of such locality, who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning or carrying out of the project, will have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this agreement; and LAND CONSERVANCY will take appropriate steps to assure compliance. LAND CONSERVANCY agrees to abide by the provisions of 24 CFR 84.42 and 570.611, which includes maintaining a written code or standards of conduct that will govern the performance of its officers, employees or agents engaged in the award and administration of contracts supported by Federal funds. 6. Severability If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement will not be affected thereby, and all other parts of this Agreement will nevertheless be in full force and effect. 7. Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between CITY and LAND CONSERVANCY for the use of funds received under this Agreement and it supersedes all prior communications and proposals, whether electronic, oral, or written between City and LAND CONSERVANCY with respect to this Agreement. 8. No Agency or Employment LAND CONSERVANCY is solely responsible for the conduct of its activities in association with this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement creates a formal partnership, agency, joint venture, employment, or any other type of relationship. LAND CONSERVANCY shall not represent itself as an agent of CITY for any purpose and has Page 43 of 370 no authority to bind the CITY in any manner whatsoever. LAND CONSERVANCY and all of its agents, representatives, or participants in any manner in the performance of its obligations and duties hereunder, shall be employees, independent contractors, or volunteers solely of LAND CONSERVANCY. They shall not for any purpose be considered employees or agents of the CITY. 9. Indemnification LAND CONSERVANCY agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY and its officers, directors, affiliates, employees, and agents, from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) directly, indirectly, wholly or partially arising from or in connection with any act or omission of LAND CONSERVANCY, its employees or agents, in accepting the funds, in expending or applying funds, or in carrying out the project as set forth. CITY agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless LAND CONSERVANCY its officers, directors, affiliates, employees, and agents, from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) directly, indirectly, wholly or partially arising from or in connection with any act or omission of CITY, its employees or agents, in expending or applying funds, or in carrying out the project as set forth. 10. Termination The CITY or LAND CONSERVANCY may initiate termination of this Agreement in the event of a substantial breach of the terms of this Agreement, or in the event of gross negligence, upon ten (10) days written notice to the other Party. Said termination shall be effective thirty (30) days after receipt by certified mail of a notice of termination to the other Party. 11. Compliance with Human Relations Commission “By Laws” LAND CONSERVANCY hereby certifies and agrees that it will comply with the Human Relations Commission’s “Bylaws” which creates an environment within the City in which all persons can enjoy equal rights and opportunities regardless of race, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, age, physical, mental or economic status. 12. Notices For purposes of notice under this agreement, all notices shall be considered effective upon being sent by certified mail to the following addresses: To CITY: City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: City Manager Page 44 of 370 To LAND CONSERVANCY: The Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County 1137 Pacific Street, Suite A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: Executive Director IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed the foregoing as of the date year first above written. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: By: ________________________________ Date:_____________________ Whitney McDonald, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:_________________________________ Date:_____________________ J. Christine Dietrick, City Attorney THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: By:_________________________________ Date:______________________ Kaila Dettman, Executive Director Page 45 of 370 Page 46 of 370 March 30, 2026 City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: Mayor Stewart and City Council Via: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Bob Hill, Sustainability & Natural Resources Official RE: Righetti Fiscalini Ranch Conservation Easement Dear Mayor Stewart and City Council, The Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County (“The Land Conservancy”) respectfully requests the City Council’s consideration of a $65,000 contribution to help fund a conservation easement on the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch, located on Orcutt Road south of San Luis Obispo in the scenic greenbelt surrounding the City of San Luis Obispo (“City”). A conservation easement on this ranch will permanently protect a suite of scenic, agricultural, and environmental conservation values. Project Overview The Righetti Fiscalini Ranch conservation easement project will protect 199 acres within the City’s Greenbelt. The property is situated within Edna Valley’s complex of long-standing agricultural lands, including the adjacent Dixon Ranch which was protected by The Land Conservancy in 2023 with modest matching funding from the City. The Righetti Fiscalini Ranch is a prominent part of the southern San Luis Obispo Greenbelt and is visible from many City vantage points and open space areas. Two seasonal streams converge on the ranch which ultimately feed into San Luis Obispo Creek. Wildlife including black bear and various raptor species are frequently observed on the property. The ranch’s current agricultural uses include approximately 91 acres of avocado orchard and 55 acres of vineyard. The proposed conservation easement will permanently protect these scenic, environmental, and agricultural conservation values by restricting development to one potential future single residence within a defined building envelope. Additional restrictions will prohibit future subdivision, intensive non- agricultural land uses, activities that lead to soil erosion, unnecessary removal of native vegetation, and other perpetual land use restrictions. These restrictions will ensure the conservation values of the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch are protected in perpetuity. Support for City Goals Protecting the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch will address multiple City policy goals. The City’s 2025-2027 Financial Plan identifies pursuit of land conservation opportunities to improve the Greenbelt as an ongoing priority to achieve their Open Space, Climate Action, and Resilience goal of sustaining and advancing open space and natural resources. Additionally, the Conservation and Open Space Element of the City’s General Plan states that open space and productive agricultural land within the Greenbelt should be protected and maintained to preserve the City’s charm and character. The Righetti Fiscalini Page 47 of 370 Ranch conservation easement will directly support these goals by protecting 199 acres of highly scenic and productive agricultural land from development within the City’s Greenbelt. The permanent protection of the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch also aligns with the sustainability and healthy community policies identified in the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan in two important ways. First, the conservation easement will support the City’s efforts to maintain and expand natural areas surrounding the city to foster carbon sequestration. The natural and agricultural land cover on the property will continue to absorb and store atmospheric carbon for generations to come. Second, the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch provides significant contributions to the City’s goal of supporting local food systems, including produce grown on the ranch, which are a local favorite at farmers’ markets and co-ops. Finally, the City’s participation in the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch conservation easement acquisition would add to the long history of successful conservation partnerships between the City and The Land Conservancy. Multiple Greenbelt, open space, wildlife habitat, and riparian protection projects have been completed through this partnership including Bowden Ranch, Stenner Springs, Maino Open Space, Guidetti Ranch, and Dixon Ranch among many other conservation and ecosystem restoration projects in the greater City region. Funding, Timeline, and Long-Term Stewardship City funding toward this conservation easement will be heavily leveraged by the California Department of Conservation’s Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program ($2,125,000) and the John S. Kiewit Memorial Foundation Grant ($200,000). These two match funding sources amount to 97% of the appraised conservation easement value of $2,390,000. This easement would be fully funded and able to close in fall 2026 should the City choose to grant the final $65,000 gap. Once acquired, the conservation easement will be held and stewarded by The Land Conservancy. The permanent conservation of the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch will be realized through a perpetual commitment to annual monitoring of the easement and, if required, enforcement of easement terms. Funding for this perpetual stewardship commitment will be donated by the landowner at the time of close and will be held in The Land Conservancy’s dedicated Easement Stewardship and Defense account. Thank you for your consideration of this funding request to protect a key property within the City Greenbelt. Maps and photos of the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch have been included below. Please contact Kyle Walsh, Conservation Director at 805-544-9096 or kylew@lcslo.org with any questions or for additional information. Sincerely, Kyle Walsh Conservation Director Page 48 of 370 Page 49 of 370 Page 50 of 370 Photos of the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch Figure 1. Coyote seen roaming through the grassland at the Righetti Fiscalini Ranch. Figure 2. Stream channel which connects to San Luis Obispo Creek, shown adjacent to serpentine rock outcrop. Page 51 of 370 Figure 2. Avocado orchard with Cerro San Luis and Bishop Peak City Open Spaces in the background. Figure 1. One of several owl boxes located throughout the property. Avocado orchard shown in the background. Page 52 of 370