Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/26/1993, 2 - REQUEST TO EXPAND AND MODIFY EXISTING PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTRICT. I���III�O�IIINIIIIIIIIII�II�III _. MEETING GATE: C� San I llls �B�Sp� Oct I 2D 1993 smaze COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER: FROM: Michael D. McCluskey, Director of Public Wo Wayne Peterson, City Engineer SUBJECT: Request to expand and modify existing preferential parking district. CAO RECOMMENDATION: A) Adopt by resolution, expansion of preferential parking district to conform with Exhibit A to include Fredericks Street and staff recommended modifications. B) By motion, deny request to expand hours of parking restriction, 2:00 A.M. to 6:00 A.M.; to limit new permits to only those who currently reside in the district; to make further changes to parking regulations to provide special permits for those without off-street parking. BACKGROUND In 1979 a preferential parking district was established in the residential area south of the Cal Poly campus (boundaries as shown in Exhibit D). The parking district established a residential permit parking system during daylight hours (8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.), Monday through Friday. The current district rules prohibit parking on the streets by non-permitted cars. Residents may obtain a permit for each vehicle registered at the address for a small fee. In addition each resident may obtain 2 guest parking permits. Council received a request to modify the parameters of that District on May 11, 1993. The request (Exhibit.B) is proposed by Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN). The expanded area is shown on Exhibit C and the final Proposed District on Exhibit A. The request proposes: ■ to prohibit cars without a valid permit from parking on streets throughout the entire district between 2:00 A.M. and 6:00 AM.; ■ to expand the existing parking district to include portions of Fredericks Street (Grand Avenue west to 1400 Fredericks); ■ to allow all current residents to obtain permits during the first 60 days after the district is modified and to only renew permits obtained during that time and only to the original permittee. ■ to make available 4 day nonresident guest placards for the current fee. ■ allow special need parking to occur by arrangement. This would include older properties that do not meet current standards for off-street parking and live-in health care workers if adequate off-street parking is not available. ■ enforcement by complaint or random patrol. -�I !!��!����►�liulllllllll�10 111111 MY Of San � .-j s OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Preferential Parking District Page 2 ■ restrict parking in front yard set-back except for on driveway. The stated goal of the RQN is to discourage parking after 2:00 A.M., however the apparent result would be to discourage the change of the neighborhood from owner-occupied residents to rentals. The proposal discourages the use of the homes as rentals by limiting parking to only off-street spaces whenever the occupants change. The RQN is also interested in enforcing zoning regulations which prohibit parking on lawns in set back areas. The Parking Management Plan (PMP) (Exhibit E) and the parking district's enabling ordinance (MC) (Exhibit F) establish criteria by which new districts can be formed and existing districts ! modified. Staff used this criteria and developed guidelines for the development of districts. The guidelines include a procedure (Exhibit G) for requesting formation of, or changes to, a district 1 including the appropriate techniques for collecting majority support (more than 50%) of the property owners in a proposed district. The subject request has such a petition. The applicant's representatives, Henry Case and Tom Kay, will be presenting a larger petition at the City Council meeting. Staff has been told that the petition contains signatures representing more that half of all 1 the residents in the district, and more than half of all the residents that would be brought into the district. The portion of the petition which staff has received is on file in the City Clerk's office. It represents the signatures of 126 individuals representing 73 residential properties out of a potential of 185 properties. DISCUSSION i District Expansion: The request asks to expand the district to include both sides of Fredericks Street. The only implication is the need to install more new signs. Residents in the expanded area did sign the petition. The two churches included in the district would not normally be impacted, as the regulations are not in effect during weekends or early mornings. Eleven of 23 properties benefitting from the addition of Fredericks Street have signed the initial petition. Expansion of the current district is not a problem. If Council wishes to expand .the district it can do so by adopting a resolution. I Additional Restricted Hours: The request also-asks for the prohibition of parking between the hours of 2:00 A.M. and 6:00 A.M. Monday through Friday. This request does not appear to fall within the guidelines established for preferential parking districts. Prior to implementing this portion of the petition the Parking Policy and Municipal Code would need to be revised. In addition, the Police Department would have primary responsibility for enforcement of this proposed regulation. However,because of limited staff available during those particular hours and other high priorities, the Police Department has indicated they will not be able to give the parking prohibition significant attention. The Public Works Department does not have staff available at that time of night to enforce any parking regulations. Therefore, this provision would normally only be enforced on a complaint basis. The petitioners understand this and are willing to accept the fact that aggressive enforcement may not be possible. '1111%1111$11 0111111 city Of San LMS OBISpo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Preferential Parking District Page 3 Private Property Restrictions: Another portion of the request asks for parking restrictions on private property. The existing parking district includes properties exclusively zoned residential, either R-1 or R-2. In both zones, the minimum requirement for the street yard setback is 20 feet, measured from the front property line. Structures and required parking spaces are already prohibited from being located within the required street yards unless an exception is approved. Access to areas for required parking is permitted in a street yard, which in an R-1 zone generally consists of a driveway approximately 20 feet in width serving a two-car garage. Additional paving of properties for parking that is visible from the street would only be permitted if the area was outside of the street yard (i.e. more than 20 feet back from the front property line). Enforcement of parking restrictions in the set back area by the Community Development Department is difficult under the terms of our current ordinances, and will be addressed more fully in the proposed.Property Maintenance Ordinance. Therefore, existing zoning regulations do address the creation of formal parking spaces in street yards. Existing vs. New Residents: The most significant issue in the petition is the limitation on the number of permits that may be issued. In essence, it requests that all current residents be given 60 days to apply for permits 'for each vehicle they own, keep at the residence, and wish to park on the street. After 60 days no new permits would be issued. ever. The issued permits would only be renewed to the current resident. Should the resident move or fail to renew the permit, it would be voided. It is assumed that replacement vehicles would be permitted, but additional vehicles would not (although the issue is not addressed). New residents, whether owners or renters could not obtain a permit. The limitation on future residents may raise potential legal or fairness questions. It is not compatible with the current Parking Policy or Municipal Code. Under both of these documents all residents of the area are treated equally. At some point in time there will be more new residents than old, with significant portions of the district void of parked cars. Assuming the new property owners do not agree with the restriction they will most likely petition for relief. Proponents of the change feel there is precedence for the restriction on future residents referencing Proposition 13, property tax, and zoning changes which affect only new applications. Parking Permits: The petition proposes a 4-day placard. The current provision of two guest parking permits per residential property appears to work satisfactorily. However, special parking for live-in health care workers would be handled using the existing visitor permit system. Guest permits or resident permits, if the healthcare worker is truly living in full time, would be used for health care workers. Special Circumstances: The issue of providing parking permits for those properties that do not have sufficient off-street parking is more difficult to address. Special guidelines and standards would need to be developed identifying what constituted special circumstances and a unique parking problem that could be easily administered. Most properties have at least some off-street parking, although perhaps not to the 67) Z�) �u�►�►bNIfVIIIIII�IINII�III city of san tins oBispo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Preferential Parking District Page 4 current standard, i.e. number of spaces or covered. Some off-street spaces, due to building modifications, are not available for off-street parking. Other Issues• In addition to the requests in the petition, staff notes that the original district was set up with a map showing the boundaries of the district and the rules which allowed residents of R-1 property (whose street frontage was in the district, but not the property itself) to buy a permit. This has led to some confusion in administration of the District since 1979. If the district boundaries are to be changed, staff recommends that the district boundaries be modified to include all streets that have parking restrictions and the lots containing residents that are eligible to buy permits. FISCAL IMPACT There is a small fiscal impact that will result from approving this request. First, all the signs in the current district would need to be replaced if the hours of operation are changed. Second, new signs and posts would need to be installed in the expanded area. Third, the city would have to go through a process of issuing new permits. Current permits were issued in September. There is an implied additional cost to expand the enforcement of the restrictions during the early morning hours. This may not be a significant additional cost if it is of a low priority and only occurs on a complaint basis and on an availability basis. No new resources would be involved. Estimated costs: New signs in current district $1700 Additional signs in expanded district $1900 ALTERNATIVES Alternative 1 - Do nothing. The existing district works well and accomplishes what it was originally intended to do. Residents and visitors of residents in the neighborhood can park on the street. Overflow parking from the adjacent campus during the hours designated no longer is impacting this neighborhood. All residents, owners or renters, have an equal opportunity to park on or off the street. This alternative is consistent with the Parking Management Plan (PMP) policy which says that "Special Parking Districts should be established as necessary, in residential areas which are congested with vehicles parked by persons not residing in the area, to restrict parking to preserve the quality of life of area residents." The Municipal Code (MC) also sets guidelines for the establishment of parking districts in section 10.36.170. It requires a finding that the parking problem relates to non residents. Alternative 2 - Add the 1400, 1500, 1600 and 1700 blocks of Fredericks Drive to the district. Slightly less than 50% of the residents have signed the initial petition. More may sign the petition that the RQN is bringing to the Council Meeting. If this alternative is pursued, all the residents in the affected area should be noticed and given an opportunity to speak at a public hearing prior to adoption. This alternative is also consistent with the PMP policy and the MC and is the staff recommendation. ����►n��iiuuIIIIIII�pnA�����N city of San LjS OBISpo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Preferential Parking District Page 5 Alternative 3 - Add the new hours of parking restriction requested. This will initiallymake little change in the existing situation. This alternative is inconsistent with the PMP policy and MC in that no finding can be made that non-residents are impacting the area between 2:00 A.M. and 6:00 A.M. weekdays. Alternative 4 - Restrict the issuance of permits to new residents or those who do not obtain one during a 60-day period of time as requested by RQN. Over a period of time fewer cars will be parked on the street as the current residents leave the area and new ones move in. This alternative is inconsistent with the PMP policy and MC. If the Council wishes to proceed with either Alternate 3 or 4, it should direct staff to return with recommended change to the Parking Management Plan, the Municipal Code, and appropriate ordinances. CONCURRENCES The Police Department concurs that it does not have sufficient manpower necessary to regularly enforce the expanded hours of the parking district effectively, and that it would provide enforcement on an availability basis. The Community Development Department concurs that existing regulations are in place to regulate parking in street yards. The City Attorney concurs that potentially significant legal issues may be raised by the disparate treatment of current residents vs. future residents. Attachments: Draft Resolution Exhibit A: Proposed District Boundaries Exhibit B: Proposed District Revisions w/Petition Exhibit C: New Areas to be Added to District Exhibit D: Existing District Boundaries Exhibit E: Excerpt from Parking Management Plan Exhibit F: Excerpt from Municipal Code Exhibit G: Preferential Parking District Guidelines Exhibit H: Petition Update (10/13/93) Submitted by Henry Case on 10/14/93 g:/misc/preleren.me m a-s RESOLUTION NO. (1993 Series) J A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING AN AREA OF THE CITY AS A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT AREA, ESTABLISHING DAYS AND HOURS OF OPERATION OF SAID AREA AND SETTING FEES FOR APPLICATION FOR A PARKING PERMIT WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has received a petition from a majority of the residents living within the neighborhood shown on "Exhibit "A" , and, WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that the quality of life for the residents of this area has been adversely affected by non-residents using the neighborhood streets for parking and, WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that the elimination of non-resident parked cars from the district will decrease the ambient noise level, lower air pollution levels, and improve other environmental characteristics of the neighborhood and, WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that the elimination of the non-resident parked cars will improve pedestrian and vehicular safety and allow residents to gain proper access to their residences and, WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that there is appropriate alternative parking for non- resident cars on the Cal Poly Campus, and WHEREAS, the Council has previously established a Residential Parking Permit District within the neighborhood, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: ��lD Resolution No. (1993 Series) Page 2 SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 10.36. 170 et seq. of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code the residential parking permit area established by Resolution No. 3932 (1979 Series) is enlarged to include all areas shown on the attached Exhibit "A" . SECTION 2. No vehicle other than vehicles providing services to the area or having a permit attached to it or a visitor's permit in the driver's side window may park on any street in the area between the hours of 8: 00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. , Monday through Friday, except for holidays. SECTION 3 . The Public Works Department is directed to post the area with signs that clearly indicate these restrictions. SECTION 4. The Public Works Director shall issue residential parking permits and guest parking permits on demand as permitted in Section 10.36. 210 and 10.36.220 of the Municipal Code. Permits shall be issued for a year beginning September 16 and shall be prorated if issued during the year. SECTION 5. Fee for each residential permit shall be $5. 00. SECTION 6. Fee for guest parking permits shall be $5. 00. Guest permits shall be issued annually as are residential parking permits. SECTION 7. Fee for replacement of mutilated or lost permits shall be $5. 00. SECTION 8. Residential parking permits shall become void if either the owner of the vehicle moves out of the area shown on Exhibit "A" or the owner of the vehicle sells the vehicle to an individual living outside the area shown in Exhibit "A" . a- 7 Resolution No. (1993 Series) Page 3 SECTION 9. Enforcement on streets added to the current district will not begin until February 1, 1994 . On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 1993 . MAYOR PEG PINARD ATTEST: CITY CLERK DIANE GLADWELL APPROVED AS TO FORM: XtyrAtt ne g\preferen.mem by a- g ? W and aWHO Y = a' j tit LLC ca oat to Q soc IL OZTZ t Dau I J UE—E wW I wu Q Q ix-3 o+u ecu 7 V WW?m- I oru W W m���W I out � G SOVW I I� tau Z J� �:Z }a Z Z 0 t 9 J Loot scat °d' tz 3 g t® a O p 0 O t 3 u toot coot toot Om Z OYmQ H S W > G�ttl I trot orot Ltot N V m U. I t int Lcot >_ int W d I Z N}Z� I test wt atot z O� 1 �mm- p r_c 3 5 Cat Oct f4L Dei LR tar a c o a t mct by q9c DRIVE Z W Ln t LrLt q? tot Lez nc sct La sat Vf W Y I b� oast U V451 Siam°O}m sLot .tzr t w t cost r2 asst w t Le+t mF 0arq C qr % scrt OEC LL Ia stst lee got aaL m atcsaL to LANE I mi BicQ mz 2 cos nt eoc t t.rt ctz fit ort a Sa to cm art ML aor V ccr Dal S°2u MLat tat roc not rat sot Not LONGVIEW LANE 17a rw rt rit ` IA act ALLEY Oct \ Orr arc wL ut au EI AVE. b \ t6 CaL tcL WL w � oat � rm Ivni � Dost art rot YLt ♦ t y\ DR. st a i tctI L3 tat \ 6 \¢ ,zzb \ 0 oat 0 OR OR arc f!Z rRt � cu tK uc tac tac to tt v1P�( Lu a- g PROPOSED R-1 STREET PARKING DISTRICT REVISION AMENDMENT TO THE PARKING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO In recent years there has been a marked increase in the numbers of automobiles stored on R-1 zone residential streets in the city. Residential streets have been designed, built and intended to support local traffic and incidental, as opposed to permanent, parking for visitors and residents. Of particular interest is the existing preferential parking district roughly bounded by Slack Street, Grand Avenue, Fredericks Street, Longview Lane, Bond Street and Hathway Street. This parking district is characterized by curved streets with restricted visibility causing concern for children, pedestrians and bike riders. Many streets are very narrow and some have no curbs. Multiple parked vehicles restricts space for passing of vehicles traveling in opposite directions and for emergency vehicles. To mitigate this problem we propose that the parking district be amended such that parking between 2 AM and 6 AM and between 8 AM and 5 PM, Monday through Friday would be allowed by permit only. All other hours no permit would be required. • During the two months after the effective date of the ordinance, all residents could obtain permits for street parking of their vehicles for the current fee . Thereafter, only renewal of previous permits would be issued. This would provide for a gradual phase in so as not to create a hardship. • Four day nonresident guest placards would be available for the current fee. This would be a continuation of the present practice, except the same placard would be used day or night. • Special need parking would be available by arrangement. This would include older properties that do not meet current standards for off street parking and live in health care workers if adequate off street parking is not available. • Enforcement by complaint or random patrol. For information phone : Henry Case 543-7138 (Albert) Bob Andreini 544-6688 (Hathway) Tom Kay 543-6286 (Chaplin) Phil De'ak 543-5869 (student rep.-Slack) Revised J=30.1993 a-�o PETITION TO AMEND THE EmAKING ORDINANCE OFF THE PROPOSED R-1 P S'i'1tICT F SAN LUIS OBISlPO The undersigned residents request that a parking district be farmed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lang Longview Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr,Grand Ave.(McGolkum to Fredericks),Fredet- rand to# 1440),Slack St(Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave. (Longview to Bond), icks St (G Kentucky(Grand (Bond to Hathway),Bond St(Kentucky to Hathw�ay),McCollum St(Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. . Special needs parking can be arranged. • The ordinance shall be implemented byphby new ordinance. • fisting parking regulations not sup� • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHO. NAME of � �7ei� G�-t �• .�1G -033 MAA6A4C- t6!1-14 s^ 6reert 4, nut 6J;Nl Fred k-Czrmj Q . / I1 3 !pk SH�1—s/ r-a 5wa r 11 ij� Fld lom Weaver- Vile- -4 e ver- a sw 545MALL -�s .5y/" REWRN TO NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESFNfATWE Name Addirss TeL Na PETITION TO AMEND TIIE. f ..4KING ORDINANCE OF THE C.- i OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PROPOSED R-I PARKLNG DISTRICT The underiged resi&rtts request tri;a parldng district be farmed to include the following stns: Chaplin lane,Lorg,iew Lane,Alttct Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave. (McCallum to Fredericks),Freder- icks St. (Grand to # 1440), Slack St. (Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave. (Longview to Bond), Kentucky St. (Bond to Hathway),Bond SL(Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St. (Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street paridng between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit - Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. • Special needs parking can be arranged • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not superceded by new ordinance. • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (OXKXW) NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. KEA;j 97W X. �o LoNr vviF J yS� i� 1hCW(.v Ertl .S9N Lvis c i5 c- RETURN TO NTIGHBORHOOD R>PRESFNTATNE NAS Address TeL No. KTIJARAAW11% TO AMEND THE PE: ING ORDINANCE OF THE CI OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PROPOSED R-1 PARKING DISTRit:T The undersigned residents request that a parking district be famed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave.(McCollum to Fredericks),Freder- icks St. (Grand to# 1440), Slack St. (Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave. (Longview to Bond), Kentucky St. (Bond to Hathway),Bond St.(Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St. (Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit. • Short term guest parkdng may be arranged without fee. • Special needs parking can be arranged • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not superceded by new ordinance. • Parldng in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Optional) 7—NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. F ►'r,)i '.�� �. )iti � -L 6g. I — 2iLi 1-04Nt '4s'2 7 i �r ,L.✓. � 3�c7. _ '�07I e7- 933-/9 C ' j cWA -o zs MWZ o E lN� S 544Ze S7- 5S-Oe2 he 6-r -,dA,e zss s ys= .40 /Cox RETURN TO NEGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE Name Address TCL No. . )3 TO AMEND THE I KING ORDINANCE OF THE C: OF SAN LUIS OBISPO rROPOSED R-IPARKING DISTIT The undersigned residents request that a parking district be formed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr,Orange Dr,Grand Ave.(McCollum to Fredericla),Fredet icks St (Grand to# 1440),Slack St.(Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave. (Longview to Bond), Kentucky St (Bond to Hathway), Bond St(Kentucky w Hathway),McCollum St (Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: - No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. - Special needs parking can be arranged • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not superceded by new ordinance. - Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Optional) NAME ,,.SIGNATURE,/ ADDRESS PHONE NO. Lot's GreeK'r 11 FredQr.c4s 15Y3'Sy95' CA GW�sj Ln C{ fi b RETURN TO NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE Name Addir� TeL Na a-��f i ViiiiVa \ TO AMEND THE P' XING ORDINANCE OF THE C'"'' OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AOPOSED R-1 PARKING DIS7. ..;T The undersigned residents request that a parking district be farmed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave. (McCollum to Fredericks),Freder- icks St. (Grand to# 1440),Slack St. (Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave. (Longview to Bond), Kentucky St. (Bond to Hathway),Bond St. (Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St.(Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. • Special needs parking can be arranged. • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not superceded by new ordinance. • Parlong in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Optional) NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. 22-2- dtLAcu Q S43 roses G ler A5. 100,0t �f(o .��3 -7/0/ OF .c1 Baa— tet' 3 O S yff-t ` x;�,u ty4 ' gig All RETURN TO NEIGHBORHOOD ttBP"ZWrAWYM Name Address Td.No. J TO AMEND THE P' `GING ORDINANCE OF. THE CIS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO _AOPOSED R-1 PARKING DISTMCT The undersigned residents request that a paridng district be formed to include the following struts: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave.(McCollum to Fredericks),Freder- icks St. (Grand to# 1440),Slack St. (Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave.(Longview to Bond), Kentucky St. (Bond to Hathway),Bond St.(Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St. (Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: a No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit. • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. - Special needs parking can be arranged • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not superseded by new ordinance. • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. /4/71NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS P(Opti NO. tib • ( ASM K iA ��� E • {ZRsrk , 4-5 LurJ�vr� s P--65C ',001r ZsOol/o • � /f0 6L i//Y! �` -bit <— e TA rc% Leeo 3-2 3 C-60 l i n [Aompts . . kR u,ws,o 3G9 CHP�pLiN LANE IulARtot�1 � X64 ca- ' L,/lean lea ��Gh /�� CA.0 syr b� si RE]VRN TO NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE Name Addle= Tel.Na TO AMEND THE Pt --- 'IlVG ORDINANCE OF THE CT" OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ._.OPOr ED R-1 PARKING DISTi_ T The undersigned residents request that a parking district be formed to include the following strew: Chaplin Lane,Implew Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave.(McCollum to Fredericka),Freder- icks St. (Grand to# 1440), Slack St. (Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave.(Longview to Bond), Kentucky St.(Bond to Hathway),Bond St.(Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St.(Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit. • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. • Special needs parking can be arranged. • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not super ceded by new ordinance. • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Optional) NAME SIGNATUU�RE ADDRESS PHONE NO. �v.4c?.v �ON ase �eTs�a �.f• � N� Y� `� s�(1�cKSr �' 1 � �� 2 9 .Z 4z y f of S /D EOCULE O ra.e,jca - 2.'� �� ado/ � a �y ROIL C, WAP RETMN TO NEMBOMOOD RF.PRRESSWrATWE / J / TO AMEND THE P` —KING ORDINANCE OF THE CT" OF SAN LUIS OBISPO .40POSED R-1 PARING DIST. .:T The undersigned residents request that a parting district be formed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr,Orange Dr,Grand Ave. (McCollum to Fredericks),Freder- rcks St. (Grand to#_1440), Slack St.(Longview to Grand) ,Hathway Ave.(Longview to Bond), Kentucky St.(Bond to Hathway),Bond St.(Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St.(Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. • Special needs parking can be arranged • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases • Existing parldng regulations not superceded by new ordinance. • Parldng in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways (Optional) NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS, PHONE NO. V00m.H• Lavfgic4i O+E-Eo Com,►-.�� •z +�4Uacov% r KK-ZY6(? �u of wvt� 299 Nbel Drive 6VI 0Y6 David t ord. 91 Alberk Dnve sr SVY4 C �S3 C�11�tti+ �'r. ¢3�SIeS . � �' r` Gorz�a r... ,2310����• � ---- l�(�2 MUM TO NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE Td.No. a-18 r�iltltivl� TO AMEND THE F KING ORDINANCE OF THE C ' OF SAN LUIS OBISPO eROPOSED R-1 PARKING DISTi%jCT The undersigned residents request that a parking district be formed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave. (McCollum to Fredericks),Freder- icks St.(Grand to# 1440), Slack St (Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave.(Longview to Bond), Kentucky St (Bond to Hathway), Bond St (Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St (Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit • Short team guest parking may be arranged without fee. • Special needs parking can be arranged. • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not superseded by new ordinance. • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Option) NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. SG S— �E�i E LigmA ZZ( L*4s —,N Lia 583 'Sy3-�'I.G' 5�3 — SYz— �O�cPM4�j.�� �9s frr IN% 93 y/ kCG tM,ce. a3 l uc �1.• 3 1 RETURN TO NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE: Name Addtesa TeL No. a- �9 TO AMEND THE P. UNG ORDINANCE OF THE CT OF SAN LUIS OBISPO jL AOPOSED R-1, PARKING DISTkA,.T The undersigned residents request that a parking district be formed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Alm Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand.Ave. (McCollum to Fredericks),Fmder- icks SL (Grand to# 1440),Slack SL (Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave.(Longview to Bond), Kentucky SL(Band to Hathway),Bond SL (Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum SL(Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit. • Short term gest parking may be arranged without fee• • Special needs parking can be arranged. • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not supmeded by new ordinance. • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Option) NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. 1,� Jr.c. -t 5 L c �.`i•i;(:)lL; . �'S /?:i;h.� �•.. lS ,(fI1'I'if1r�.'i)C ��3 -/=yj r IZcbzrT Ul Y'QIP3l ,y,,a ' 12 Nct�l� ter+ aft 5-WIU 2 d � r A10— e-Met v w ►� �`��' Ga ` G�}�s �C' -..� ,. qk�w 54J. 1429 V G yip-7,Y,4 Nil r l t-ok- U t X Gig ` SoarR-S. doonsart I 9J,,t S 170 SY3=3� RETURN TO NEIGHBORHOOD REPMefrAnVB Name Address TeL Na a�o TO AMEND THE PA' 'ING ORDINANCE OF THE CIT-- OF SAN LUIS OBISPO .-.OPOSED R-1 PARKING DISTL_ _T The undersigned residents request that a parking district be formed to include the following streets: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave. (McCollum to Fredericks),Freder- icks St. (Grand to# 1440), Slack St.(Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave. (Longview to Bond), Kentucky St. (Bond to Hathway),Bond St. (Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St. (Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit. • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. • Special needs parking can be arranged. • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • Existing parking regulations not superceded by new ordinance. • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Optional) P R WNAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. /lC�r 0 ase. f�`�i. i E. �yo.�. Z44 Sy3.=/13� nsz Geon e L. �3rar.a' Eu' ica.�Q 237171>ei,43W3 9G0 ,v F e67;r" 7 Z Z) �L�lll ��L x`19 47 r; �� �at•� y-•� 1L93 ���K• DL Sof =110 L 1-E La ct'S s E/ Cru ni ;iUe� . �t It :I L =T — 5 c c N �►�� C- k -� J 5 �l/ S ( r1 C/r S7 s .P o S 5' c 7 .54.40. 3- 1A?S' A-( AJ I C j�P-evrtljL s4ak 96 sL� sc�2 RETURN TO NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE Nsme Address TeL No. TO AMEND THE P UNG ORDINANCE OF THE Cl' OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AOPOSED R-1 PARKING DISTI%r*WT The undersigned residents request that a parking district be farmed to include the following street: Chaplin Lane,Longview Lane,Albert Dr.,Orange Dr.,Grand Ave.(McCollum to Fredericks),Freder- icks St(Grand to 11440),Slack St(Longview to Grand),Hathway Ave.(Longview to Bond), Kentucky St(Bond to Hathway),Bond St (Kentucky to Hathway),McCollum St(Albert to Grand). The key elements of the parking district are: • No street parking between 2 AM-6AM daily without a permit • Short term guest parking may be arranged without fee. • Spacial needs parking can be arranged. • The ordinance shall be implemented by phases. • bdsting parking regulations not superceded by new ordinance. • Parking in front yard setbacks shall be confined to driveways. (Optional) NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE NO. {cd-frac-) s044,3 7 orw oma, lbY1, 5T Sq-3 `f4 d erg 51 43 -7 t is -nj ,( v 5#-�V7- Y JO -r t L i3o �U 1 nog j I 16 0A01qz3- 3 7, V3 731 .fA�� S!./EA�,•� � /63'L fe�c� c�s ��-S7/S �- z Jh w e /6Y Y REn N TO NDGHBORHooD RuRESIxrAmvE Nam Addersa TeL Na . l3 3 3hd CN"o F{�- J W yj dW tt[ ccc ex 6x to Q W I DOLL Z F I OMI fie► Q 2 F F OtL sots ~ J O U g I tort W U a Ld I� d M }}oz w a 1�1M� F- W N m Z O N yZj�W W rQ i ut test GLOL x W� M6 S u IML OMI List ZO ¢mo p H XQ (�1X 4 LMl a"I Cut W PKV) Y W m z t~ t IC6t cML > Lot O Q O F F W w I Iesl IM6t61 m 11 LLJsac I all ML o N y 9LL at par m W to �W I =I �, � DRIVE CL I1 K Z M 1 tsL gar ca[ cc La 969 In 091 y�L Gest U ml VLSI i cast Oct W 6tsl W I leVl 6LL� '� 0°L �e � list Sze stn Ger W A4 � M[ at m air s4 SANE I ML err Q a6L �[ Mc un ru SIL q Q srt ez+I [IL s[i astir Sar V r¢ W/l M[ Mn 60i GSL lOL pC GGS MC 6G[ LANWEW LANE Its 61X1 _ — 161 176 2W Ire 22, 2 9t \ 41 Oct \ OEl SIL 0[2 06L OLS OeL \ AVE. to et¢ LIZ to< G un F1Lt N Isll S t IML JUL ML - R. GF' st at uA tet C ` O OZZI � m 9LZt 60! 6[L 6K 16 1ILL \ S t t6L l J l 1 G \ 00 3A`d ONKZiD J Q � it Rr CR ser ti►. 0 f I l%t Z w F— I DOLL L Ir W F I act Bott m a C I tact 10) .� C7Vm Z Z Z I I U Lut OLS1 Y. ` W LULW u Y I N FU twt Bwt X Q o L991 11191 EC21 W a— Itrot Mot > w Int r�7 I FE tit tut Bwt � ast BLL ►BL BBC LB[ /9C II sst 1y DRIVE II NSL i4 Jy tBi LOL lot SLC LLC CBC I/) T OOSL U erew nst °R Bc9t w Lw vu Ix m r4 '� r9 li 919t COL Ba Q Btr ,Q rqr ox E I I C61 BIr DBr J l sw . I I tMl gigCL sti BtZ SCr Ozrt rli CZ7 Orr mt 1 Dor Lir WWI SBrBa.t BDL psymr LOX pr DDC ►ac BBC LONGVIEW LANE art _ 20 111 721 1 291 Lit Rt ,� 1 ut 1 \ Vol oa accFT AVE as oec ,= to nc uz t9s a � G , BLZ or a I H V to p� om Y 1 1111t Pit iLl ►QLt , DR. tsrit `�` ,G�(i tL tOl Iz tri° O Dirt m SILE11 I But Ya rut Ou we OOc Wi LBC Its � to cl9c • G a� �>s t EXHIBIT E Parking Management Plan Page 5 Public Awareness 0 YCY•: e general public should be made aware of the Parking Management its benefits to the downtown. ACTIONS. �� • Features of t ` ment Plan will be publicized through local media before events o • Promotionals, such as gr ngs for the structures, also can announce the anticipated change` • Special emphasis will be given to the tive features of the plan and the reasons why changes are exp ecrt occur.' • Varning citations will be issued prior to inc in fines. TIMELINE: Ongoing. ` P t:•z•pa zvn—in— emen 1-onAan PO • City s maintain a cooperative relationship with private and public se oyers and employees. ACTION: • Staff will continue to work City's Parking Management Committee as long as it exists and - with the Business Improvement Association, Chamber of Comme County staff to review and make recommendations for possible the Parking Management Plan. Residential Parking Districts POLICY: • Special Parking Districts should be established as necessary, in residential areas which are congested with vehicles parked by persons not residing in the area, to restrict parking to preserve the quality of life of area residents. ACTION: • After implementation of changes to meters on the streets, parking patterns and habits should be examined to determine if parking districts are needed in surrounding residential areas. Their establishment can be initiated by staff. Council or local residents. TIMELINE: Review parking habits in the area north of Monterey Street after opening of Palm Street Parking Structure (January 1988) . Review parking in residential areas south of Monterey Street after the opening of the Marsh Street Structure (June 1989). 10.36.130-10.36.180 EXHIBIT F Whenever t e operating air-con ► ion)ng m e that an emergency traffic congestion is frigeration units. lik to result from the holding of public or Between s often p.m.and seven a.m., priv assemblages, gatherings or functions, or no person al leave standing on any for o r reasons, the chief of police shall have street or public right- y vehicle,except a power d authority to order temporary signs to passenger vehicle, with a ing refrigera- be erec or posted indicating that the opera- tion or other unit t6 cool, he 'dify, or tion,par g or standing of vehicles is prohibited otherwise air-condition the cargo ar or on such st is and alleys as the chief of police to shall direct ng the time such temporary signs the n are in place. h signs hall remain in place only during the exi nce of such emergency and the 1036.170 Designation of residential parking chief of police all cause such signs to be permit areas—Adoption of removed prompt thereafter. resolution. B. When signs horized by the provisions of A. The council may,by resolution, designate this section are in p e giving notice thereof, no an area of the city as a residential parking permit person shall operate, k or stand any vehicle area if the council finds that the area is predomi- contrary to the directi and provisions of such nantly residential,that the streets in the area are signs.(Prior code§ 320 2) congested with vehicles parked by persons not residing in the area,and that limiting the parking 1036.140 Parking of la a or commercial of vehicles along the streets in the area to vehicles vehicles near ersections. registered or controlled and exclusively used by No person shall park any hicle greater than persons residing in the area is necessary in order six feet in height, including ny load thereon, to preserve the quality of life of persons residing within one hundred feet of a intersection at in the area. any time. This section shall t apply to any B. In determining whether limiting the park- particular intersection until Si or markings ing of vehicles along the streets in the area to giving adequate notice thereof h been placed vehicles registered to or controlled and used as determined appropriate by th ity engineer. exclusively by persons residing in the area is nec- (Ord. 1062§ 1, 1986: prior code§ 9.14) essary in order to preserve the quality of life of persons residing in the area, the council shall 1036.150 Nighttime parking of la consider the effect of vehicles parked by persons vehicles. not residing in the area on ambient noise levels, Between the hours of ten p.m.and se,. a.m., air pollution levels and other environmental it is unlawful to park or leave standing up any characteristics of the area; pedestrian and vehic- public right-of-way within two hundred of ular traffic safety in the area; and the burden on any dwelling, any vehicle exceeding (1) tw ty persons residing in the area in gaining access to feet in length, or (2) six thousand you s their residences. (Prior code § 3209.17) unladen weight ca 1036.180 Designation of residential parking 3209. permit areas—Content of resolution. The resolution designating an area of the city as a residential permit parking area shall describe the designated area along which parking will be (San Luis Obispo 7-66) 208 10.36.200-10.36.235 parking permit area, the city traffic engineer 10.36.20 Residential parking permit— shall cause appropriate signs to be erected along Issuance. the streets identified in the resolution which Upon the application of any person residing shall give notice of the limitation on the parking in a residential permit area, the finance director of vehicles in the area as provided in Section shall issue a residential parking permit for each 10.36.170,and shall indicate the hours and days vehicle described in Section 10.36.180(1). Fur- when such limitations shall be in effect. (Prior ther, upon application of such person the code § 3209.19) finance director shall issue no more than two additional residential parking permits for each 10.36.200 Limitations on parking in a residence address for use by visitor vehicles des- residential permit parking area. ignated in Section 10.36.180(2).Each residential It is unlawful for any person to stop, stand or parking permit issued by the finance director for park a vehicle on any street identified in a reso- a vehicle described by Section 10.36.180(1)shall lution adopted by the council designating a resi- set forth the license number of the vehicle for dential permit parking area during the hours which it is issued, and shall be valid for a period and on the days set forth in such resolution of one year, or for a shorter period as may be except: prescribed by the council by resolution. A per- A. Those vehicles described in Section mit issued for visitor vehicles shall be denoted as .10.36.180 displaying a valid permit issued as a visitor permit, shall set forth the name and provided for by Section 10.36.220;or address of the resident to whom it is registered B. An emergency vehicle, including, but not and shall be valid for a period of one year,or fora limited to, an ambulance, fire engine or police shorter period as may be prescribed by the coun- vehicle; or cil.by resolution.'(Prior code § 3209.21) C. A vehicle which is under the control of a person providing service to property located in 10.36.230 Residential parking permits— the designated residential permit parking area, Display required. including but not limited to a delivery vehicle. Parking permits issued under Section (Prior code§ 3209.20) 10.36.220 shall be displayed on a vehicle in a manner prescribed by the finance director. 10.36.210 Residential parking permit— (Prior code§ 3209.23) -- Application—Fee. Applications for residential parking permits 1 shall be filed with the city finance director in a i NNNOW form prescribed by the finance director,shall be on shall stop, stand, park or leave accompanied by proof in a form satisfactory to standin torvehicle in any city parking lot the finance director of the applicant's place of where vehic rking has been restricted by a residence and in the case of application for the resolution ado the council; provided, resident's vehicle, proof of registration or use that signs specifyin trictions, or condi- and control of each vehicle for which a residen- tions under which par ermitted, shall tial parking permit is sought, and shall be have been posted at all entra such prop- accompanied by a fee in an amount fixed by erty. Such signs shall be appro as to resolution of the council as per schedule on file wording and posting by the chief cc. with the finance director. no part of which shall be refundable to the applicant. (Prior code § 3209.22) 209 (San Luis Obispo^-Ss) IV.w.iw limited(1)to vehicles registered to or controlled and exclusively used by persons residing in the area, and (2)vehicles registered to or controlled by and exclusively used by visitors to persons residing in the area,and shall set forth the hours and days when parking will be limited to those vehicles. (Prior code§3209.18) 10.36.190 Designation of residential parking permit areas—Sign posting. Upon adoption of a resolution by the council designating an area of the city as a residential 208-1 (San Luis Obispo%66) T0: David F Romero EXHIBIT G FROM: Wayne Peterson SUBJECT: Preferential Parking Guidelines DATE: May 10, 1989 The Parking Management Plan and Municipal Code Sections 10.36. 170-190 provide guidance to staff as to how and when preferential parking areas should be established. 1: Preferential Parking districts should be established when necessary, in residential areas congested by parked vehicles owned by non residents. 2. Preferential Parking districts should be established to preserve the quality of life of area residents. 3. Preferential Parking districts can be initiated by residents, staff or council . 4. Council must consider the effect of non resident parked vehicles. on ambient noise levels, air pollution, pedestrian and vehicle safety and the burden on persons residing in the area in gaining access to their residences. Staff interpretation of these guidelines is as follows; 1 . Preferential Parking districts should only be considered for residential areas where the residents want them. Determination of the desire to have a district should be established by the passing of a petition which describes the district and the type of parking restriction that will be applied. �^ 'r , "� ,•„ L.,,! 3. Staff will activily assist residents prepare the petition to assure that it is clear and reasonable. 4. Staff will support districts that have reasonable boundaries. They should not be so small that the problem is moved from one block to the next. The parking restriction should be easy to enforce. The district shows promise of solving a problem. 5. Other solutions should be explored. S. After receipt of a petition staff will study the area and vdrify that the problem exists and would be solved with the establishment of a district. 7. Staff will meet with the neighborhood petitioning for a district and attempt to work out a mutually agreable district. S. Staff will schedule a public hearing before the Council to take testimony and assist Council in making a decision as to the formation of a district. 9. If a district is formed Staff will sign the district as required and enforce the district restrictions as required on a complaint basis. 10. Generally districts should be formed only in areas predominately single family in character. EXHIBIT H Petition Sign as of October 13, 1993 Street No. Last Name First Name Albert 205 Clark Kathryn Chris 206 Tedone Louis M. 213 Gregory C. Herold 225 Cotton John F. 228 Vieth Jim Margaret 236 Gordon Ruth Mary D. Somsel Joseph Carole 237 Brand George L. Delores T. 244 Case Henry 0. Doreen H. 252 Pullaro Julie Harrington Brigid Fischer Pam Casada Marie Wallace Patricia 253 Aiken Jim Pat 258 Leverich William H. M. Marilyn 265 Marx Jan 278 Davidson Otto C. Sue D. 281 Crane Franklin S. Mary 299 Lord David Suzanne 325 Dompke Joanne 384 Strauss L. Harry Cora 385 Page Ester Bond 1214 Taft Linda 1216 Hoye Deanna 1274 Morrison Maxwell Edna Chaplin 222 Horton William F. Glenna B. 235 Merriam John L. 285 Rabat Lillian 286 Moore Leta B. 290 Grant David M. 302 Conley Frances E. 305 Neuner Celia 323 Thrasher Frank P. Helen L. 330 Hoover Page 1 k3o Petition Sign as of October 13, 1993 Street No. Last Name First Name Chaplin 369 Kay Thomas Marion 385 Danley W. Austin Jane 0. Fredericks 1574 Wilson A.G. 1616 Forsyth Lee Jeanann 1631 Greenall Charles Lois 1632 Sheahan Frank 1646 Jones Kenneth Norma 1661 O'Connor Eugene L. Ruth H. 1676 Adler Karen L. 1692 Brunson Chester A. Dorothy 1739 Springer Michael 1740 Balla Gordon 1760 Beaumont Rick Grand 285 Taylor Chris Hopkins Scott 311 LeVaughn Eric 323 Shelton Jason D. 395 Huebner Heinz Hathway 10 Hurley John Virginia 12 Andreini Robert Viola 14 Gates Vincent Claire 16 Vix Marlin Cynthia 18 McMeen George Bernadine 188 Voss Darrell Moreno Lisa K. 208 Perry Ron Dachauer Dan 215 Albers Nicole Grifficen Sophia Wendy 230 Lefebvre Raymond J. Marianne 281 Weaver Tom Welch Emmet Bowman Eric 291 Oliva Michelle Pierce Tricha Page 2 A - 3 ) - 3 ) Petition Sign as of October 13, 1993 Street No. Last Name First Name Hathway 291 Mass Jessica 321 Lee Michael T. 38 Hardy, Jr. Richard J. Cooper Michael Kentucky 110 Ream Sharon 111 Potter Elizabeth P. 140 Harrington John Mary Callarman Scott 169 Rosen Sam Kay 176 Johnson Robert S . 220 Corcoran Margaret 230 Irwin R. Pery Madalyn 231 Perdew Adeline G. 250 Milton John D. Smith Laural G. 290 Nash, M.D. James H. Donna D. Longview 125 French George Marion 163 Milton Lurene 179 Silverstein Michele 215 Frost Robert Romona 221 Ferguson Risa Hesse Tyler Deliema Ben 249 Rasmussen Dorthy E . 250 Butzbach Authur G. Ora C. 271 Evans John H. Kathryn L. 291 English Dayna Hungerford Celeste Thompson Jessica Stehly Christine Toomey Jennifer 300 Parce Joan Don 304 Mc Cracken Kenneth E. Diana L. 308 Reichenberg Beryl A. McCollum 1621 Wiley J. Barron Doris E. 1647 Allardt Frances 1693 Shimek Christine Orange 110 Wright Tom Turvy Carol Page 3 Petition Sign as of October 13, 1993 Street No. Last Name First Name Orange 111 Swart Sandra 130 Tallman Delores 133 Hooper Jennifer Altman Marisa 138 Green Winfred M. Beverly L. 148 McCall Pamela 159 Ogilvie William Sandee 164 Howe Olga Slack 1405 Dodds Oscar L. 1429 Betchart Joseph Hilda 1525 De'ak Phillip Sangvinet Dave 1541 Yerger Stephen R. Washburn William Lola 1573 Kraus Tim Gray Randy McColam Steve 1591 Perello Dominic B. Christine B. Page 4 �-33 MEETING AGENDA DATE IT REVISED RESOLUTION NO. (1993 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING AN AREA OF THE CITY AS A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT AREA, ESTABLISHING DAYS AND HOURS OF OPERATION OF SAID AREA, SETTING FEES FOR APPLICATION AND TIME OF RENEWAL FOR A PARKING PERMIT, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 7008 WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has received a petition from a majority of the residents living within the neighborhood shown on "Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that the quality of life for the residents of this area has been adversely affected by non-residents using the neighborhood streets for parking, and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that the elimination of non-resident parked cars from the district will decrease the ambient noise level, lower air pollution levels, and improve other environmental characteristics of the neighborhood, and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that the elimination of the non-resident parked cars will improve pedestrian and vehicular safety and allow residents to gain proper access to their residences, and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that there is appropriate alternative parking for non- resident cars on the Cal Poly Campus, and WHEREAS, the Council has previously established a Residential Parking Permit District within the neighborhood, COU9'CI� ❑ CDD DIR l�CAO 11 FIN DIR fB�ACAO ❑ I;E CHIEF JbTTfInN-y "V DIN CLEF.L:A OLICE CHF RLC DIF; 10 yPFAZ)FELE U UTIL DIF; i -_ 0 PERS Dill BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 10. 36. 170 et seq. of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code the residential parking permit area originally established by Resolution No. 3932 (1979 Series) and• revised by Resolution No. 7008 (1991 Series) is enlarged to include all areas shown on the attached. Exhibit "A" . SECTION 2. No vehicle other than vehicles providing services to the area or having a permit attached to it or a visitor's permit in the driver's side window may park on any street in the area between the hours of 8: 00 A.M. and 5: 00 P.M. , Monday through Friday, except for holidays honored by the City of San Luis Obispo. . SECTION 3 . The Public Works Department is directed to post the area with signs that clearly indicate these restrictions. SECTION 4 . The Public Works Director shall issue residential parking permits and guest parking permits on demand as permitted in Section 10. 36. 210 and 10. 36. 220 of the Municipal Code. Permits shall be issued for a year beginning September 16 and shall not be prorated if issued during the year. SECTION 5: Fee for each residential permit shall be $5. 00. SECTION 6. Fee for each guest parking permit shall be $5. 00. Guest permits shall be issued annually as are residential parking permits. , Guest permits shall only be valid on the block for which they are issued. SECTION 7. Fee for replacement of mutilated, lost, or stolen permits shall be $5.00. Guest permits shall not be replaced. Resolution No. (1993 Series) - Page 3 SECTION 8. Residential parking permits shall become void if either the owner of the vehicle moves out of the area shown on Exhibit "A" or the owner of the vehicle sells the vehicle to an individual living outside the area shown in Exhibit "A". SECTION 9 . Enforcement on streets added to the current district will not begin until February 1, 1994 . SECTION 10. Resolution No. 7008 (1991 Series) is hereby rescinded. On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: . AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 1993 . MAYOR PEG PINARD ATTEST: CITY CLERK DIANE GLADWELL APPROVED AS TO FORM: Citk Attorn y owe.a� w ,SETING AGENDA � :c° /CDD DATE ��6-9ITEM # EF L t :�� QUtMCHF POLY ii �� Il�P•FT TCS i ❑ REC L'IF CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY C Tll_ / n �I F` c Ii UG{h SAN Luis OBISPO, CA 93407 1 U P`Ii$Dil't STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES mmmcm �"'°"��"_ (805) 756-1211 /^ , � — - _e �= -��— v t OCT 2 21993 dlry COUNCIL AN LUIS OBISPO.06 ' THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY MEF--'GG_,�b-Q3 AGENDA DATE RECEIVED C y N C I L Cl COD DIR L7 C�9 ❑ FIN DIR OCT 2 2 03 . /ACAO EY ❑ ICHIEF CITY COUNCIL Q�CLERK/CEi1G POLICE.CHF SAN LUIS OBISPO, p MGUTTFAM ❑ R`C DIR li UTIL MR a---JGrL L!!.L C7 PEES DIR Slo C,, Oct Tl4 �.►� �✓Cy C4"V- C t t E ti +C-e r s `�i.a 667 PIPa Q7�s -a<p / /v+1 1 T V-lei I 1&% or.1 ✓ Q ✓-C e4.. -/a. V re ►mow►:`F F"e�,V-k I&^el -c,,a IK 2-A M T S PM . / FIs weu0-4*1...44I ek ".Ssivc "-c Y-k 11 s,—k o w e r in 1 14 4-epc, &19 TC4 &2116Lj pece*b,z'a7 Ter �/P�✓T� �v�u'�S �v �ti� �veiclkq go�u�r�s, / George H.AIcueen 18 Hathway Aye San Lula ODlapo,CA 8340 1418 . AGENDA .L26�-9-3- ITEM # October 24, 1993 Don and Joan Parce K4?"Cot Nica 300 Longview Lane COD DiR D IR San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 0 RN71 546-9442 0 RR9: 3- aRNE-EY OLI�E CHF City Coucil b-6LER 'Duce:cm, City Hall 0 MGccT Tr.i:.*, Ci REC DIR � I ., r 0 -V .- I J San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 0 U Dear City Council Members, MILIE Because of previous committments, we are unable to attend the council meeting Tuesday evening and express our views on the proposed extension of the parking district around the university. We hope this letter will be added to those voices in favor of the proposal . . We have resided on Longview for over six years and intend to stay in our present home for years to come, so we are naturally interested in preserving the quality of our neighborhood. Having so many cars parked on both sides of the street is a problem for several reasons. First, they restrict visibility on these narrow streets which were intended to serve quiet neighborhoods. Our living area windows overlook Longview and Bond St. and we have witnessed accidents and near-accidents frequently over the years. Also, streets lined with cars all day and night make maintenance either difficult or impossible. The mess on Slack St. is a vivid example--trash, dirt, leaves, dog messes everywhere. Even our end of Longview is rarely properly swept because of the cars. Thirdly, the proliferation of cars obliterates the city-lead idea of having quiet, well-kept residential areas. We, as permanent residents .and taxpayers, are tired of sitting back and letting street after street, neighborhood after neighborhood, become undesirable eyesores. Not only does this trend make day to day living more difficult, it also lowers our property values! We are committed to not parking on our street, even though we must juggle - cars often, because we feel we are detracting from our neighborhood by doing so. Please pass this very fair proposal and return the neighborhood to the neighbors. Sincerely, Don Parce Yn QE fvE�a OCT 2 10-3 Crry t MEETING AGENDA DATE TEM # Mrs. Edward R. Wallace 4455 Titan Avenue Lompoc, California 93436 October 22, 1993 Is Jr C012"Cl p CEDDIR A0 ❑/ 'r?E CHIEF San Luis Obispo City Council 1 `+r0riF.EY 166lD11171 City Hall 9 CLERrK/GRiG KrC BCE CHF Box 8100 ❑ r.Rc ^T�a,r:; ; �,e1F San Luis Obispo , California 93403-8100hj❑ Dear Sirs : My husband and I own a single residence student rental at 252 Albert Drive in San Luis . We purchased the property in 1992 with the intention of moving to San Luis in the near future when my husband will retire from his medical practice in Lompoc. We like the quality of the neighborhood where we purchased our house and look forward to its being restored to it former status as a primarily single family residential neighborhood. Although the number of cars on the street is reduced and improving, we still notice quite a few cars , which, as we all know, unfortunately tends to indicate an area in need of improvement , primarily because of under-maintained rental residences . Since limiting parking has an impact on restricting the number of occupants of a--dwelling;-_we .are -asking that our neighborhood be included in the restricted parking area. Thank you for your attention to this matter Sincerely yours Patricia Wallace - — IV OCT z 193 CITY CO'J:J"1L ". L.;:S OE'SPO, CA MEETING AGENDA Z DATE.LQ'Z ITEM • �Uh:Ce!:.. 02DD Li�l 4 -A0 Ej FN 019 First . F'ea. i want to apologize for the racti ,:nns of my neighbors. They seem to thin:: that all the City council has to do is spend precious time on idiotic parking ordinances- that are the whims of a few. We live on Albert Dr. . in the center ± If the area in auestion. My w`i.fe and I find this type of requ.lation offensive and disturbing to what should be a wonderful. way of life. We hope that you and the council see f i. _. to refuse the real_Se t for this ordinance. Thank: you for reading this brief letter . r � I Tony Amato . •• .. � lj.4�� r OCT � �g 'Ji:Y �. •. WILCIIIYu nuLnvn r% ATE I0-2 - ITEM # 137W 1555 Slack Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 October 25, 1993 The City Council 990- Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 Dear Council Members.: I am writing to raise some qustions and to make some observations regarding the request to expand and modify the existing preferential parking district in the residential area south of the Cal Poly campus. Unfortunately, I am unable to attend your meeting. I know that you will give my letter your thoughtful attention. As the owner and resident of my home on Slack Street I have a personal concern for the quality of life and safety in our neighborhood. I also have a concern for fair and equable treatment for each person in our neighborhood, those of us now here and those who will be our neighbors in the future. I want you to know that the preferential parking regulations,as it now exists on our street, serves our needs very well. I can understand the need of other residential streets to adopt the same plan. This plan recognizes that between 8 AM and 5 PM on Monday thru Friday there are nonresidents who would take parking away from the residents of our neighborhood. After 5 PM on weekdays and on most weekends there is seldom a parking problem. My understanding is that, under the proposed parking revision, all current residents could obtain permits for street parking. Thereafter, only renewal of previous permits would be issued. Future residents of our neighborhood would not be able to park on their own street between 2 AM and 5 PM on weekdays. It certainly does put a new onus on the word "preferential". I ask the City Council, is this the kind of city you want to design for the present and the future ? I realize that double standards are so pervasive in our society. Does it really have to come home with us ? How would you feel living in a neighborhood where you can not park on your own street while your neighbor can ? What kind of livability, what kind of harmony and security are engendered by such an arrangement ? I raise these questions for myself and on behalf of all those future neighbors who have no voice and no vote here and now. What you decide will severely impact our lives and our neighborly relationships for years to come. Sinc rely, ,, CC U%,C!L CDD DIR Q C ❑ FIN DIR Vincent C. Walsh ❑ FIR CHIEF A�CP:P:."Y IfYFi`!D{R <_essvIIvr CLER S/GZ;G 160LICE CHF ❑ fAC-11T;:�;:; 01 FEC DIR2 5 1993 a ❑ CRF �F:4_: C UT t C;P OCT =i-�- - - - — 0 r=d;s'�:i: CITY COUNCIL SAN LUIS Os:SP0. CA