Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0001-1000 Items1 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Monday, February 19, 2024 11:09 PM To:Jordan Michael Estrella Subject:Re: Potential Meeting? Hi Jordan, It sounds like the Active Transportation Committee might be a great place for you to start. Are you taking transportation or planning classes? Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E estewart@slocity.org T 805.783.7838 C 805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Jordan Michael Estrella < Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 7:06 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Cc: Alondra V. Cardoso < Subject: Potential Meeting? This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hello Council Members, I hope you are all doing well. I am a citizen of SLO who has lived here and is a student at Cal Poly. I have recently become really interested in Urban planning. I want to learn more about urban planning and how some safety systems like street signs get implemented. I also have some inquiries on how to advocate for the implementation of a crosswalk on some of the streets near campus. It can sometimes be a little intimidating walking here and I just want to learn more. Because I live here and want to get involved in the community, I figured this would be a good way to start. 2 Best Regards, Jordan Estrella 3 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Wednesday, February 14, 2024 11:34 AM To:Patrick Lemieux Cc:CityClerk Subject:Lemieux (SL Ranch Eucalyptus trees) Hi Patrick, Thank you for your email. The City has met with concerned residents and the property owner at the site to understand the concerns of the community and discuss potential paths forward for requesting removal of the trees. At this time, the property owner is responsible for the safety of the trees as well as their ongoing maintenance. The City has been working with the property owner (San Luis Ranch) over the past several months to ensure they understand the process through which they can request that trees be removed. The property owner submitted an arborist report and request for removal of trees yesterday with information about the trees in question that will help facilitate the process moving forward. Staff is currently reviewing this information and will continue to work with the property owner on this request. I hope this information is helpful, Thank you, Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications BCC:CC From: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 8:28 AM To: Patrick Lemieux <plemieux@calpoly.edu> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: cc Lemieux (SL Ranch Eucalyptus trees) Patrick Lemieux, Thank you for taking the time to contact the City Council on this issue. The City Council has received your concerns and Timmi Tway, Community Development Director, who is responsible for responding is copied on this email. Timmi or a member of her staff will be following up with you within two business days. 4 Note that the City has implemented a system that allows citizens to ask questions, report concerns, and directly make requests to staff who handle the topic area via our website. Should you feel that this may be useful for you in the future, please visits our AskSLO page where you may also download the app for mobile engagement. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 slocity.org Bcc: City Council From: Patrick Lemieux <plemieux@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 6:26 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: Pellegrino petition letter This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear City Council – Please find attached my signed petition letter to resolve an important problem in our community. Thank you, Patrick Lemieux, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Mechanical Engineering California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 5 From:Rice, Jennifer Sent:Wednesday, February 14, 2024 8:48 AM To:jgirolo@calpoly.edu Cc:Stewart, Erica A Subject:RE: Question Dealing with Parking Revenue Hello Jack, Mayor Stewert forwarded me your correspondence, and while I do not have a revenue per space # to share with you at this time, what you are mentioning is exactly what the Parking Rate Study will be analyzing and I highly encourage you to get involved with that current effort. There is a virtual community meeting today between 12:00 -1:30 PM (you can join by clicking the link on this page). There is also a current survey you can participate in: https://communityfeedback.opengov.com/portals/sanluisobispoca/Issue_13598. There will be an additional community meeting mid-March to review the data collection and the initial input received along with draft recommendations. I’d be happy to add your information to the contact list for this effort. And just a follow up on the revenue per space calculation – yes, staff did prepare this when developing the parklet program, but as there have been several program changes in parking since that time and the current Rate Study will be looking at this exact thing, I don’t know how helpful it would be for me to find that previous calculation that was done, but let me know if you do want to see it and I will track it down. Thank you for reaching out and please let me know if you have any questions about the rate study or how to participate. Thanks! Jennifer Rice, PTP, AICP pronouns she/her/hers Deputy Director of Mobility Services Public Works Mobility Services 1260 Chorro, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E jrice@slocity.org T 805.781.7058 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Jack E. Girolo < Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 11:58:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Question Dealing with Parking Revenue Dear Erica, Thank you very much for the quick reply I’m curious as to the how the revenue per paying spot has changed over the years. It would be helpful to know the number of paying spots over the years. 6 I think that we have a serious problem with regard to parking in this city. The current system is overly complicated, too expensive for the public and too costly for city business’. The information requested might be helpful in coming up with a more fair and simple system. Then again it may not. It’s a start. Thank You, Jack On Feb 13, 2024, at 8:27 AM, Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Jack, I remember an annual cost per spot when we were discussing the parklets. I’ll check with the parking staff and have them connect with you. Is there a specific ask or a specific vision you are hoping to accomplish with this one number? I’d like staff to be able to give you all the information you are looking for. Best, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: Jack E. Girolo < Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 1:25:17 PM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Question Dealing with Parking Revenue This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Dear Mayor Stewart, Do you have available the revenue per paying parking spot per month for the last two years or so, or how would I find out this information Thank you, Jack Girolo 7 8 From:Ryan Gruss <rgruss@calpoly.edu> Sent:Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:15 PM To:Josh Machamer; Joey Leslie; Philip J. Williams; Cynthia Vizcaino Villa; Dan Banfield; Hermann, Greg; Molly B. Clark; Alicia M. Doyle; Jennifer L. Haft; Geri LaChance; Stewart, Erica A; Cody VanDorn; Jennifer L. Fanning; Mike McCormick; Johnson, Derek; Tom Strait; Pease, Andy Cc:Milly Barizo; Thomas A. McPherron; Andrea Castillo; Kristin Hoover; Nicole M. Pitman; Elliott N. Stava; Stan Nosek; Tammy L. Farrell; Elizabeth Goolsby Subject:Reminder - PAC Commission Meeting - Wednesday, February 14 at 8:30AM Attachments:CCPACC Meeting Packet.pdf; 2023-24 CCPACC Roster.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi PAC Commission members and staff, Our next meeting is Wednesday, February 14 at 8:30AM in the PAC Founders Room. The meeting agenda, meeting minutes from October 11 and our current budget documents are attached in preparation for the meeting. The current roster for Commission voting members and alternates is also attached. We will have coffee and pastries ready for you. Looking forward to seeing you next Wednesday! Ryan Gruss Director - Performing Arts Center San Luis Obispo Cal Poly San Luis Obispo O: 805-756-2790 | C: | W: pacslo.org Central Coast Performing Arts Center Commission (CCPACC) Meeting Wednesday, February 14, 2024 – 8:30 am – PAC Founders Room Agenda 8:30 am 1. Introductions and welcome Leslie 2. Approval of Minutes from October 11 meeting Leslie 3. Public Comment period (limited to 3 minutes each) Leslie 8:40 am 4. Foundation Update Hoover 8:50 am 5. Cal Poly Arts Update Clark 9:00 am 6. Facility Subcommittee Report Gruss/McPherron  Subcommittee Report (Gruss)  2023/24 MEMRRP budget update (McPherron) 9:10 am 7. Budget & Finance Subcommittee Report Banfield/Gruss  Subcommittee Report (Banfield)  2023/24 Operating Budget actuals to date & projections (Gruss) 9:25 am 8. Managing Director’s Report Gruss/Staff 9:50 am 9. Additional business Leslie 10:00 am 10. Adjourn Attachments: 1. October 11, 2023 CCPACC meeting minutes with attachments 2. Consolidated financial reports packet Mee$ng Minutes from Central Coast Performing Arts Center Commission (CCPACC) Wednesday October 11 , 2023 – 8:30 am – Founders Room, Performing Arts Center GUESTS Kris4n Hoover - Execu$ve Director, Founda$on of the Performing Arts Center PAC Staff: Ryan Gruss, Tom McPherron, Milly Barizo, Andrea Cas4llo, Tammy Farrell , Heather Gray, Nicole Pitman, and EllioI Stava * Present members, alternates, and guests are noted in bold. 1. Introduc+ons Leslie • Leslie opened the mee.ng at 10:00 AM, beginning with introduc.ons, no.ng new members Jennifer Ha? and Stacy Sully 2. Approval of the Mee+ng Minutes from June 22, 2023 VOTE: Mo+on to approve the mee+ng minutes Villa 1st, Ha? 2nd, mo.on passed unanimously. 3. Public Comment Leslie With no public comment requests, Leslie moves to the next item. MEMBERS ALTERNATES Josh Machamer Joey Leslie Tom Strait Geri LeChance Stacy Sullivan Derek Johnson Greg Hermann Phillip Williams Molly Clark Cindy Vizcaíno Villa Mike McCormick Dan Banfield Cody VanDorn Erica A. Stewart Jan Marx Jennifer Haft Alicia Doyle 4. Founda+on for the Performing Arts Report Hoover • Hoover welcomes Stacy Sullivan to the FPAC Board and shares she will be serving on the CCPACC as well. Stacy is from SeaMle, where she served on the Pacific Northwest Ballet board for 15 years. She brings her life-long knowledge of the performing arts to FPAC. Geri LaChance will be serving for CCPACC as a vo.ng member and Stacy Sullivan will serve as her alternate. Tom Strait will serve as Joey Leslie’s alternate. The new addi.ons are filling openings from outgoing members. LaChance is serving as the FPAC Board President, Strait is the Vice President, Morgan Houlis is the Treasurer, Maren Hu?on is the Secretary, Nicole Mainini and Brandon Downing are the new members at large. • Trudie Safreno and Mary Ellen Simkins have termed off FPAC, serving 10 years. Their .me and contribu.ons were celebrated and honored at the FPAC retreat. • September 22nd, FPAC held their Board retreat, where they focused on strategic goals including the 30th anniversary campaign in 2026, increasing access to the PAC for individuals and organiza.ons, and joining the SLO Cultural Arts District despite not being located downtown. • Hoover shares staffing changes: Erika Neel FPAC’s Development Director has le? her posi.on at FPAC, Courtney Gruss has been hired as the Development Assistant, and Laura Kervin is the new events assistant. • The Founders Room is going to be fully redesigned with the change of the carpet. • Plaza construc.on is underway. • There isn’t an FPAC Gala this year, this event will occur every other year, with the next one is September 20, 2024. • December 6th is the holiday party for FPAC, paired with the Nutcracker rehearsal. 5. Cal Poly Arts Report Clark • Taimane and Dreamer’s Circus kicked off the season in the Spanos, bringing in enthusias.c audiences. • CPA is currently hibng their .cket projec.ons due to audiences returning to post-pandemic numbers. • Dreamer’s Circus opened their sound check with a Q&A for the Cal Poly Music students. • October is closing with BODYTRAFFIC and Lupita Infante. Molly notes trying to strategically reach a wider community and create meaningful connec.ons in general. • “Phantom of the Organ,” the sleeper hit, is projected to have the highest organ concert .cket sales. CPA is focused on marke.ng this concert as a spooky event near Halloween. • CPA is already working on booking next season. They’re moving into the next season with a posi.ve outlook given the great start to the current season. • Villa notes Clark’s goal of inten.onally diversifying the CPA seasons and how challenging but important that work has been. She explains Clark has brought new audiences to the PAC with this necessary and community building work, and thanks her for her dedica.on to this deliberate work at Cal Poly especially during her first year. 6. Facili+es SubcommiQee Report McCormick • The PAC and Facili.es have been working on a pilot program to inventory assets and associated maintenance, a model Facili.es plans to use in other departments. • In August, Facili.es replaced the main chilled water valve. • In September they tested the “switch-gear” and breaker of the electrical system at the PAC, which showed it’s in great shape given its age. • Gil Bas.das has been designated as the facili.es project manager and primary contact for the PAC . Having a designated project manager has helped ensure work orders are completed. • The Plaza project has begun, and they hope to have most of the work completed by November 2023. The light poles will be installed in January 2024. • The PAC carpet replacement project is underway and will be completed by January 2024. This delay is due to manufacturer defect on materials and associated replacements. The scheduling of this project is limited to down .me availability at the PAC. • The jib boom at the loading dock should be in by the end of October. • The guMers are s.ll in progress. The costs of .e offs is beyond the budget, so they are looking for other ways to view and assess the area. We may need to switch project managers for this. Facili+es MEMRRP Budget Update McPherron • It ’s been a pricey year so far at $408k and expects to reach the $700k budgeted amount a?er all the projects this year. • McPherron notes he priori.zes staying under budget and that this year is requiring more projects than past years. • Villa men.ons that the hall o?en feels warm and asks why that is. McPherron explains the chill water valves need replacing. Recently, on a very hot day with a full house in the hall, one of the air handlers didn’t open all the way, so the PAC was not able to keep the audience comfortable. It’s being addressed and the engineers are working to resolve the issue with replacements. 7. Budget and Finance SubcommiQee Report Banfield • Net from opera.ons, the PAC ended within budget, with only $700 difference. He explains Ryan and his team are doing a very good job on projec.ons. • MEMRPP is tracking close to actuals. • Overall reserves are strong and healthy. • Ryan, Tammy, and their team are doing a great job on financials. 2022/23 Final Opera+ng Budget Gruss • June tech and PUF came in under where the projected revenue but came in under on expenses due to associated expenditures. • Savings on custodial staff and intermiMent part .me techs salaries were due to less work required during June. • Expenses on facility maintenance was more than projected. • The PAC is ending the year with a $120k surplus. • Gruss notes it’s been a strong year. • The PAC an.cipates having high expenses for u.li.es this coming year like in 2022-23. • Johnson asks about the salary expense line. Gruss explains Milly shi?ed from Opera.ons to Management and the transi.on in leadership from Miller to Gruss accounts for the expense differences between those line items regarding salary. 2023/24 Opera+ng Budget actuals to date & projec+ons Gruss • Gruss explains the reserves are currently totaled at $3.2M and will be at $2.8M a?er the carpet replacement. He notes the PAC has a healthy reserve. • Johnson asks about the guMer repairs. McCormick explains the number is hibng $300k, more than half the costs is the .e offs expenditures. • Gruss con.nues with the Opera.ng Budget, no.ng with only one month completed at this point, they are close to their projec.ons. • They had an unexpected expense with the re.rement of Debby Mann and associated salary pay out and transi.on to the new staff member. • The General Salary Increase number has not been finalized yet, but they are an.cipated 5%, explaining that each percentage point is about $16k in expenses to the PAC. • Leslie asks if the GSI is retroac.ve and Gruss confirms it is. 8. Managing Director’s Report Gruss (See aMached report with ques.ons and comments below) PAC Outreach Cas+llo • Leslie asks about Prop 28? And if that helps offset the expenses of the transporta.on Ticket Office. Cas.llo explains 80% of the funding will go to staffing and 20% to materials and arts organiza.ons. Poten.ally that 20% could be put towards transporta.on but that is determined by each school district. DEI Ac+on Plan DEI Educa+on and Training, KultureCity Barizo • Villa asks if KultureCity materials and trainings will be helpful for the school ma.nee programs. Barizo agrees that it will help and that some students coming to the PAC are aMending shows for the first .me and may need extra aMen.on or assistance. CPA Subscrip+on Success Stava • Stava recognizes the work of Clark and her team in bringing an exci.ng and vibrant season which helped sell the season. • Clark shares that the new subscrip.on process was seamless and that the patrons had a posi.ve experience. She notes the ease in process increased their subscrip.on numbers. • Gruss explains the new .cke.ng system has been a huge improvement for Cal Poly, no.ng Stava and the .cket office team and their hard work in selling $250k in .cket sales in one week alone. No.ng some of these sales are transporta.on for students, something the PAC also coordinates. Marke+ng Pitman • Gruss adds that Nicole and her team have been providing contracted marke.ng work for Cal Poly Arts, the Founda.on for the Performing Arts Center, and other campus departments recently and thanks them for their work. Conclusion Gruss • Villa men.ons being one of the longest serving members of the commission and that under Gruss’s leadership the PAC these mee.ngs have been some of the best she’s seen in her tenure. She notes the recent partnerships and collabora.ons are evident of Gruss and his vision for the PAC in this new era. • Gray notes, from the staff perspec.ve, that Gruss has cul.vated a culture of collabora.on and that his support of the team as a whole and as individuals has strengthened the team and made the PAC an even beMer place to work. 9. Addi+onal Business Leslie With no requests for addi.onal business, Leslie moves to the next item. 10. Adjourn Leslie Leslie adjourns the mee.ng at 9:35 am, no.ng for the record- they are ended nearly 30 minutes early. AMachments: 1. October 11, 2023 Managing Director’s Report 2. October 11, 2023 Mee.ng Packet Managing Director’s report – October 11th, 2023 CCPACC mee<ng I. Event Updates • Shows Confirmed or Added o Shen Yun § We have added two shows in March. All of their previous shows in the building have been sell-outs so we are hoping for two more. I an.cipate this will be their last .me in the market for a couple years. o Amy Grant § Goes on sale to the public October 12. This is from a new promoter to us this year and it is their second event they have brought to the PAC this season with the first being “Whose Live Anyway?”. This event will be in February. o Co-Pros § Have an offer in for Gregory Alan Isakov in March. We would be working with Good Medicine Presents. Isakov has performed here before in summer 2022. § Have an offer in for Bored Teachers in the spring. We would be working with Nederlander. It is a comedy show. o Rotary § Rotary de Tolosa will be announcing their annual fundraising event tonight at the PAC as we are hos.ng a business social for the club. They have held an annual fundraising event since the building opened 27 years ago. The event will be on President’s Day in February. o New Promoter Events § CS Lewis play has sold surprisingly well. Gebng close to 900 with significant .cket prices. A new offering and clearly a market for it. § Grand Kyiv Ballet “Snow White” sales are picking up as we close to 450. Hoping for a strong close to get over 50%. Have a liMle over a month. § Whose Live Anyway? in November has sold well and is close to 800. A solid number based on their past performances. • 2024-25 Scheduling o We are well on our way with scheduling 2024-25. We have completed Cal Poly scheduling, Cal Poly Music, our Resident Client groups and are preparing to open the calendar to Molly and Cal Poly Arts. § A thank you to Alicia Doyle for working with us to add flexibility when it comes to Cal Poly Music rehearsals to hopefully allow more dates to Molly to be bookable II. Staffing update – • Clint Bryson § Clint started in July and has been a great addi.on to our team. He has stepped into the Produc.on Manager role. It is a highly complex role that really organizes and prepares our Technical Department for shows coming to the building. Clint is s.ll teaching within the Theatre and Dance Dept and we are hopeful that this will start a pipeline for student involvement backstage. • Sean Hogoboom § Sean started in the Ticket Office in July and really has jumped in to handle our student workforce. Scheduling, managing, training and crea.ng the culture within the box office is an important part of our success as those 20 students are cri.cal to our success. III. Misc Opera+ons • PAC Outreach (Andrea) § Our Outreach ma.nee season filled up remarkably fast with around 10,000 reserva.ons. We also had over $60k in transporta.on requests where a normal year is closer to $20k. § We are looking to add an addi.onal performance of NORTH in January. NORTH is the most expensive performance we have ever had as a student ma.nee produc.on, but it is an important piece that we hope to provide to this community. We will hopefully have two student ma.nees and a special “Pay What You Can” performance that will allow 3000 people from our community to see this special play. NORTH follows the journey of a teenage boy and his young mother as they escape the Deep South and travel North through the Underground Railroad seeking freedom. • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Ac.on Plan: Our team has developed a DEI Ac.on Plan as we made a commitment to the community to celebrate our shared humanity while honoring diversity of race, gender, orienta.on, ability, age and class o We are commiMed to: § Expanding accessibility to the PAC (Heather) o Working on crea.ng a grant program for 2024-25 for resident arts groups that provide performances that celebrate Diversity, Equity and Inclusion o Cul.vate and build inten.onal engagement with diverse community groups o Provide a Spanish transla.on op.on for the PAC website § DEI commitment within Outreach Program (Andrea) o Include DEI elements in at least 50% of events o Offer addi.onal funding to Title I schools for transporta.on to student ma.nees o Provide a pay what you can performance each season o Spanish transla.on school ma.nee program § Cul.va.ng a more diverse team o One DEI commiMee member on all professional staff hiring commiMees o Priori.ze building a more diverse volunteer usher program o Priori.ze building a more diverse student team, especially in the .cket office § Adding DEI educa.on to annual staff/volunteer training programs & KultureCity (Milly) o Coordinate annual trainings for volunteers, student employees and professional staff o Provide KultureCity training for PAC staff and volunteers to become cer.fied in sensory inclusivity o Became a KultureCity cer.fied venue. The only venue between Los Angeles and the Bay Area to achieve this cer.fica.on • CPA Subscrip.on Success (EllioM) o We went on sale online for Cal Poly Arts subscrip.ons for this first .me. Roughly 70% of subscrip.ons were processed online. It was highly successful and patrons seemed to really enjoy the ease and speed of the new system. We hope to con.nue to improve this offering. It also made it more efficient for our team. o Ticket office is very busy and new system is working really well. $250,000 in sales last week alone. • ASI Partnership (Tom) o We started a partnership with ASI on campus on the tech side. We are providing a staff member to them for 20 hours a week for the next six months. Our staff member is helping to manage their equipment, prepare their spaces and train their students to provide a high quality experience for their events. • Paciolan/Digital Marke.ng (Nicole) o We started our first digital marke.ng campaign with Paciolan, our .cke.ng system provider. It went really well with over 200,000 impressions. It also was showcased with online banner ads and Youtube ads. We are seeing social media campaigns have more and more success and will be dedica.ng the majority of our marke.ng efforts towards those channels and of course, email. • Liquor License o We are working with Campus Dining to obtain a Type 90 liquor license. The Type 90 was added early this year and is specific to music venues. We are hopeful to add canned cocktails as an op.on and will be working with Campus Dining to get a percentage of revenue from those sales. The hope is to roll out this offering in the spring. • Staff Field Trip o Our team piled into two vans and headed to Los Angeles in August. We visited Royce Hall (UCLA), the Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts, and The Soraya (Cal State Northridge). We met with their teams, toured their facili.es and had a great opportunity to learn, share common experiences/challenges and see how other venues do things. It was a great experience that we hope to do again in coming years. IV. Update on other projects • PAC Plaza o The Trust Automa.on Plaza broke ground in September. They are making good progress and the hope is for the majority of the construc.on to be completed in November. Furniture and ligh.ng has a longer lead .me so likely won’t be available un.l February/March. • Carpet o As you could see on your way in, we have new carpet in the Main Lobby and Balcony. We also have it in the lower wings and in the main hall. We s.ll have to do the Founder’s Room, Gallery (November), lower lobby (January), lower lobby stairs (January), Pavilion and office (January) o We had provided six weeks for carpet demo and installa.on and unfortunately we were delayed around two weeks due to a manufacturer error when making the product. o We’ve iden.fied .mes for demo and install of the remaining areas in November and January to hopefully complete the project. • Lobby Changes/Art o A new TV has been added to the wall near concessions. This will highlight sponsors, donors and shows in more direct and dynamic way. o We have also added 14 marke.ng posters throughout the building that will showcase the coming talent and also add interest and color to our spaces. o Due to the carpet delays, we have also been delayed in adding our art installa.on to the atrium and gallery. We are currently scheduled for the ar.st to install her work in the lobby next week and have worked with Facili.es to make sure the anchor points are prepared and ready for the next steps of that project. o We will be • Stadium Concert Project • Opera.ng Agreement Final Dra? o A final dra? has been completed and sent to the Commission Workgroup that consists of Cindy Villa, Joey Leslie, Kris.n Hoover and Derek Johnson with input from Molly Clark, Philip Williams and Alicia Doyle. o We will hopefully be submibng it for approval at our February Commission mee.ng. • Cindy Villa re.ring V. Conclusion § Our team is really excited for the 2023-24 season. We definitely have our work cut out for us with the construc.on projects, a full Outreach ma.nee season and a great season of events with 3 main Broadway produc.ons. We aim to serve our patrons and clients to the best of our ability while showcasing the performing arts to new demographics and in new ways. We are thankful for the trust of the Commission and the generosity of the partners for your support as we head into another year here at the Performing Arts Center. OPERATIONS Sources (Operating Revenue) Service charges 823,569 285,737 577,460 863,197 39,628 February/Broadways/Shen Yun/OSLO still to come Gifts, Grants, Scholarships 100,500 430 91,275 91,705 (8,795) Ticket Sales 6,000 2,115 3,355 5,470 (530) Rental/Misc Income 171,500 60,645 86,533 147,178 (24,322)Related to Aug to Jan maintenance holds Ticketing Fees 520,000 476,278 148,807 625,085 105,085 High Ticket Sales year/Full year of new ticket fee Total PAC Operating Revenue 1,621,569 825,205 907,430 1,732,635 111,066 Uses (Operating Expenditures) Salaries - Management 323,833 154,212 169,621 323,833 0 Salaries - Maintenance 91,866 1,522 90,344 91,866 0 Benefits - Management 188,481 93,553 100,434 193,987 5,506 Benefits - Maintenance 66,145 801 65,393 66,194 49 Salaries - Operations 1,080,908 393,359 679,054 1,072,413 (8,495)FT employee resigned, still TBD on full impact Benefits - Operations 477,392 211,702 286,953 498,655 21,263 FT employee resigned, still TBD on full impact Travel, Training, Supplies and Services 130,800 42,768 102,519 145,287 14,487 Travel, Professional Development Facilties Maintenance, Custodial & Improvements 100,000 32,682 55,931 88,612 (11,388) Marketing & Communications 45,000 10,777 35,413 46,190 1,190 Telephone & Postage 18,061 3,853 8,396 12,249 (5,812) Bank Merchant Fees 118,000 80,593 61,871 142,463 24,463 Higher ticket sales Taxes & Fiscal Charges 155,000 80,800 99,752 180,552 25,552 Audit/CPC Software and Equipment 6,500 1,004 6,251 7,255 755 Insurance 45,000 51,499 - 51,499 6,499 Equipment Maintenance 40,000 17,598 17,172 34,771 (5,229) Parking 80,000 2,479 82,365 84,844 4,844 Utilities 240,000 135,039 130,470 265,509 25,509 Miscellaneous Expenses 41,650 14,939 32,811 47,750 6,100 Total operating expenditures 3,248,636 1,329,179 2,024,751 3,353,930 105,294 Net, before Partner & MEMRRP Contributions (1,627,067) (1,621,294) 5,772 Net from Operations:(1,627,067) (1,621,294) 5,772 Partner contributions:2,005,612$ 2,005,612$ MEMRRP Fund contribution:(375,000)$ (375,000)$ Final net from Operations, b4 Ops Rsrv x-fer:3,545$ 9,318$ 5,772 Net Operating Surplus / (Deficit)3,545$ 9,318$ 5,772 Performing Arts Center San Luis Obispo FY 2023-24 Operating Budget Notes 2023/24 PAC Operating Budget $ Variance to Year-End Projected Actuals to Date Projected Remaining Projected 2023/2024 Budget Approved 2023/2024 Budget ACT @: 01/22/24 prep by: Thomas  McPherron  Budget: 1,576,714$                            2022‐23 Year end MEMRRP Grant funds (SVOG/CA Venues)550,386$                               Grant Funds 375,000$                               MEMRRP Contribution 2,502,100$                            Projected beginning MEMRRP Balance AREA GROUP ITEM Budget spent  to date likely  to spend Projected  Yr End exp. Balance 07 General Building Equipment Vectorworks Annual $3,000 2,904 0 2,904 $96 07 General Building Equipment Replacement A/V Gear $10,000 0 10,000 10,000 $0 07 General Building Equipment Replacement Backstage Gear $15,000 436 14,000 14,436 $564 07 General Building Equipment Replacement Lighting Gear $10,000 4,247 5,500 9,747 $253 07 General Building Equipment Replacement Computers $12,000 7,929 4,000 11,929 $71 07 General Building Equipment Replacement Sound Gear $10,000 3,157 6,500 9,657 $343 07 General Building Equipment Total $60,000 18,674 40,000 58,674 $1,326 50 General Facility Jib Boom Hoist $10,000 $14,872 $5,000 $19,872 ‐$9,872 50 General Facility Founders Room Window Tint $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 50 General Facility HVAC VFD replacement $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 50 General Facility Facility LED Replacement Lamps $10,000 $9,189 $3,000 $12,189 ‐$2,189 50 General Facility Domestic Hot Protective Overhang $0 $72 $25,000 $25,072 ‐$25,072 50 General Facility Plaza Improvement $0 $5,376 $0 $5,376 ‐$5,376 50 General Facility Cold water Di‐electric replacement $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 50 General Facility Carpet $650,000 $508,053 $100,000 $608,053 $41,947 50 General Facility  Total $710,000 $537,563 $143,000 $680,563 $29,437 Grand Total $770,000 $556,237 $183,000 $739,237 $30,763 50 General Facility Roof Tie Offs/Gutter $0 $24,378 $0 $24,378 ‐$24,378 50 General Facility Paint Eyebrows $0 $139 $0 $139 ‐$139 50 General Facility Bottle Fill Station $0 $4,945 $0 $4,945 ‐$4,945 TOTAL MEMRRP SPENDING Bgtd & Non‐Bdgtd $770,000 $585,700 $183,000 $768,700 $1,300 1,916,400$                                                                   < RUNNING NET: reflects only actuals spending to date Proj Yr End MEMRRP likely and spent 1,733,400$                                                                   < Running Net Projected: reflects actuals and projected to spend in this FY BUDGETED MEMRRP Fund balance @ yr end 1,732,100$                                                                   < includes ALL items at budgeted amounts Proj Yr End MEMRRP Actual to Date 2023/24 PAC MEMRRP BUDGET ‐‐ Projected Budget Reserve balance forward: (as of June 1; will change) Allocation from 2023‐24 budget Beginning 2023‐24 Reserve Funds Available: Ongoing Projects from Previous Years C:\Users\rgruss\Downloads\MEMRRP 2023-2024 reconciliation Jan 2024 23-24 Actuals 9 From:Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu> Sent:Monday, February 5, 2024 2:07 PM To:Stewart, Erica A; Courtney Leigh Kienow Subject:RE: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Hello folks, Just wanted to share the update that due to the weather we ended up postponing the Greek Leadership Institute yesterday. At the time we made the call on Saturday, we felt uncomfortable putting 100 cars on the road for our program. Content will still be delivered in other ways, and the FSL office is already working with Code Enforcement to schedule the alternate plan. Jason Mockford (he, him, his) Senior Director, Leadership & Service | Student Affairs | Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0208 | leadandserve.calpoly.edu | 805-756- 2476 Futuristic • Strategic • Relator • Ideation • Adaptability From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 7:39 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Good Morning! Thank you both for your follow up and for meeting on Friday. I hope Sunday's institute went well. I'd love to hear any feedback from the students the code enforcement presentation. Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E estewart@slocity.org T 805.783.7838 C 805.540.1154 slocity.org To help protect your privacy, Micr osof t Of… To help protect your privacy, Micr osof t Of… To help protect your privacy, Micr osof t Of… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 1:24 PM To: Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements 10 Yes: thank you Erica. We appreciate you letting us talk through our perspective on these items very much. Your focus on the f act that we’re all committed to providing the best quality of life that we can for all of our residents is exactly the space we want to live in. In terms of our good neighbor pamphlet… I can’t find the digital copy online of the one I have in my office. The best most active online source for good neighbor policy communication is the Educated renter Certificate Program which is getting more promotion now with Sarah B leading that charge. https://deanofstudents.calpoly.edu/offcampushousing We point to a bunch of your/the city’s pages here: https://deanofstudents.calpoly.edu/off-campus-resources And here’s an ASI webpage (albeit, old) with some of the information as well: https://www.asi.calpoly.edu/asi-now/asi- blog/avoid-fines-and-act-neighborly-with-tips-from-the-sclc/ Courtney Kienow Director of Community Relations Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu From: Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu> Date: Friday, February 2, 2024 at 9:57 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>, Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Erica, Thank you for meeting with us this morning. I wanted to follow up with a copy of our Cal Poly FSL Event Registration Procedure in attachment. Also a slight correction – the Greek Leadership Institute is not tomorrow, it is Sunday (Feb 4) on campus, and Code Enforcement will be meeting with the students in the afternoon to share their existing use permits and go over processes, expectations and answer questions. I’m looking forward to this, as it is the first time it has happened since I have been part of this area (10 years now). I am hoping this can be a regular part of our connection annually with new student leaders, but we’ll assess after this weekend. Jason Mockford (he, him, his) Senior Director, Leadership & Service | Student Affairs | Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0208 | leadandserve.calpoly.edu | 805-756- 2476 Futuristic • Strategic • Relator • Ideation • Adaptability From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 8:39 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Perfect. Happy to meet with you on campus Friday at 8 AM. See you then! Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor 11 The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 6:04:14 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Yes! We can both do 8-9. Want to meet at scout on campus? Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2024, at 3:09 PM, Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Courtney, I appreciate both you and Jason being willing to meet. Unfortunately, I have meetings at those times. If you are able to meet between 8-9:30 or 330 and 5pm on 2/2. Let me know if those times will work. Otherwise, I’m copying Teresa Purrington, and she can help us find some time. Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:39 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Hi again Erica, 12 Jason Mockford and I would definitely appreciate meeting with you on this. We are both available: Friday 2/2 from 10-11 and noon-1pm. Do either of those work for you? If not, we’ll try to get more creative. Courtney Kienow Director of Community Relations Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Date: Monday, January 29, 2024 at 7:41 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Good morning, Courtney! I hope you had a great weekend, and had some time to enjoy the beautiful weather. Please see below. There is a lot in this email from Kathie Walker. Can we touch base this week to help me understand what’s allowed on the IFC, Panhellenic, and USFC front from the Cal Poly point of view? I will touch base with Derek and Timmi as well. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: kathie walker < Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 1:16:44 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Erica, Jan, Andy, Michelle, and Emily, 13 As you know from my previous correspondence, I live on with my family, and we have struggled with the constant noise from loud parties on weekends when Cal Poly is in session, especially at illegal fraternity houses. There are at least 40 documented chapter and satellite fraternity houses in the R-1 and R-2 residential zones in our small Alta Vista neighborhood, in violation of the SLOMC and Land Use Regulations. Their operation as a fraternity is documented on their social media posts and confirmed by Cal Poly’s report published online per AB 524, The Sorority and Fraternity Transparency Act. When lower Monterey Heights is included, there are at least 50 documented chapter and satellite fraternity houses in R-1 and R-2 zones in those two small neighborhoods. These illegal fraternity houses make up 15% of the total homes in Alta Vista or three out of every 20 homes! Please try to imagine how you would feel if three out of every 20 homes in your neighborhood were operating as fraternity houses with loud parties, constant traffic, booming music, screaming profanities, loud guests coming and going at all hours, trash, et cetera. It has gravely affected our family, including my husband’s ability to be rested for his safety-critical job, flying a medevac helicopter. Historically, I or my husband would call SLOPD dispatch to report loud (mostly fraternity) parties that we could hear from our house, and the calls would be cleared by SLOPD as “Negative Violation” or “Unable to Locate”. Therefore, I began going to the party to get a physical address and take a video of the party so I could prove that it was a noise violation. Still, parties were regularly cleared as “Negative Violation” or “Unable to Locate” which is extremely frustrating. The mistakes were acknowledged by SLOPD Sgt. Bryan Treanor and Sgt. Aaron Schafer after they saw the videos a year ago, but otherwise I have largely been dismissed by SLOPD leadership. I have emailed, spoken on the phone, and personally met with SLOPD “leadership” and nothing has changed, except for a brief period in March 2023, when Bryan Treanor and Aaron Schafer were acting as Night Watch Commanders. Otherwise, it’s been a disaster. The parties in our neighborhood happen every Thursday, Friday, and Saturday when Cal Poly is in session, therefore SLOPD dispatch is, unfortunately, familiar with me, and I am familiar with them. Obviously, I wish our home was not surrounded by loud and disruptive fraternity houses which, by their very nature are recognized to be disruptive and is the reason they require a Use Permit to operate only in an R-3 and R-4 zone. And obviously, I wish that we were in a situation that allowed us to peacefully enjoy our property during the weekends. It does not bring me any joy to get out of bed, follow the sound of booming music and screaming people to locate the party, take video, and call SLOPD dispatch to report the party. In fact, the ongoing noise from the fraternities is a nightmare and is causing so much anxiety and sleeplessness that it is ruining our family’s lives. So, it was especially distressing to hear a SLOPD officer (Officer John Stevens) disparage me to someone and falsely claim that I “walk around the neighborhood looking for violations” to call into SLOPD dispatch. He said that I am “very persistent” and “will continue to call SLOPD if the call isn’t acted on.” Officer Stevens also said that Residents for Quality Neighborhoods will call in every single noise violation. Further, he said that the people who live in our neighborhood are “especially sensitive to noise” and “know the municipal code inside and out.” 1. I do not walk around my neighborhood looking for violations to call in. This statement diminishes the very real problem of our current living situation, surrounded by illegal fraternity houses that regularly have blow-out parties and other disruptive activities. If SLOPD did not repeatedly dismiss noisy party calls as “Negative Violation” and/or “Unable to Locate” I would not be in a position where I had to find the exact address and continually prove that these very real, disruptive parties are happening. Our neighborhood is small – ¼ mile by ¾ mile – and we can hear loud parties, especially with booming bass music, from blocks away. If we are affected, I feel it is within my purview to locate the party and call it into SLOPD. I should not be shamed by SLOPD for doing that! 14 2. I have never met or interacted with Officer Stevens and my contact with SLOPD has been with dispatchers, some members of SLOPD leadership, and Christine Wallace. Someone at SLOPD told Officer Stevens those things about me. Although I am persistent at times, the other things he said about me are not true. It makes me feel extremely uncomfortable to know that SLOPD leadership is talking about me in such a way. It is also inappropriate for Officer Stevens to say those things to a community member when responding to a call. 3. Our neighborhood is not “especially sensitive to noise”. I have lived in other areas of the city with neighbors who were intolerant of college students and kept track of when others brought their trash bins in, etc. It made me feel uncomfortable. I enjoy the college students in our community and the normal activities of a neighborhood. It is not normal for a lower-density residential neighborhood to have 15% of their houses as fraternities without any conditions, as are required for fraternities operating legally in R-3 and R-4 zones. They are disruptive and loud, and keep the residents awake at night. Residents in any residential neighborhood living under those conditions would be calling the police for help. It does not mean they are “especially sensitive”. It means that the noise and parties are especially disruptive! Monday, 1/15/2024 was MLK, Jr. Day, which is a federal holiday. Our family looked forward to sleeping in that day. Our teenager has been slammed with a challenging workload with honors and AP classes at SLOHS and works 20-30 hours a week at a local restaurant so was especially happy that we had a morning to rest. At 7:45 a.m., we were woken by loud construction noise right outside of our bedroom windows because the investor who owns the property next door hired a contractor to replace and update their sliding door that is about 10’ from our house. There is currently no fence between our properties. I thought that the SLOMC prohibits construction on Sundays and federal holidays, so I got up to look up the ordinance. Then I called SLOPD dispatch about the noise. Officer Stevens responded and told the contractor that construction noise is not allowed on a federal holiday, so they need to stop. He told them “a neighbor who walks the neighborhood looking for violations” called in the noise, and SLOPD doesn’t “go out looking for these” noise violations. He repeatedly apologized and said “the neighbor is persistent and will continue to call SLOPD all day” if they don’t stop the construction. He also said RQN is a group that calls in every single noise violation. He did not cite the contractor for the construction noise. After Officer Stevens left, the contractors continued to use power tools to install a new sliding door for 30-45 minutes. I was confused about why the noise hadn’t stopped and called SLOPD again. The dispatcher told me that the officer said, “it is an emergency repair” and they would be finished in 30 minutes. I told her it was not an emergency repair, and the property owner was just upgrading the sliding door and the construction noise had been going on for a long time so we couldn't sleep. I was dismissed by the dispatcher. The noise continued to keep us awake and I called SLOPD a THIRD time. The dispatcher said she would open the call again. Officer Stevens returned and issued a citation but told the contractor that he could appeal the citation and claim it was an emergency repair. It was not an emergency repair and Officer Stevens knew that, according to the conversation that took place. The contractor said Monday was the only day he was available to do the repair so that’s why he did it that morning. The contractor gestured toward our house and told Officer Stevens that he knew it was us who called SLOPD. I did not realize these conversations took place until I reviewed our video surveillance later that day, which shows the loud construction for nearly two hours and the conversations between the contractor and SLOPD Officer Stevens. I am not sure if I have already shared with you that I was targeted by one of the fraternity guys last academic school year. The day after they were issued a noise citation, he began cyberstalking me by posting ads on Craigslist for people to come to my home for “free scrap metal”, opened an account on PornHub using my name, phone number, and email, made 15 various appointments for people from several religious organizations to come to my home including representatives from Latter Day Saints, Jehovah's Witness, and Church of Scientology, and spammed me with countless emails and phone calls from dozens of organizations and businesses such as car dealerships. I filed a police report and remained fearful that someone would show up at my door for any number of reasons, such as a dating-type situation, and that I would be in danger. Hearing Officer Stevens say these things and realizing that he is likely repeating the same thing to the fraternity guys when he responds to noisy parties, made me fearful that one of them may target me and seek revenge if they see me walking toward a noisy party in the neighborhood. I do not appreciate the message that Officer Stevens, through someone else at SLOPD, is spreading about me, which makes me feel unsafe in my own home. This past weekend was the Winter Rush for Cal Poly’s fraternities and while most of you may feel relaxed and rested by the weekend, our family feels that we’ve been through a war. We are exhausted and feel defeated. The loud parties started on Thursday and continued, day and night, throughout the weekend. An illegal fraternity five doors down at 1237 Fredericks Street had a huge party with over 100 people on Friday night. We could hear country music and people screaming from our house. I walked down and took a video, then called SLOPD at around 10 p.m. Forty-five minutes later, the music was still blaring, and people were still screaming. I went back down to the party and, feeling frustrated that SLOPD did not break it up, I asked the four guys guarding the front door if they realized a family lived nearby and we could hear their loud party. They said that SLOPD had already been there and told them the noise did not cross the property line and they were fine. (The noise definitely crossed the property line, as shown in my video taken at 10 p.m.) I told them it wasn’t fine, and they had five minutes to shut down the party or I would call SLOPD and would wait for them to get there. After some back and forth, they went in and turned down the music and people flooded out of the house and left in every direction, so I went home. Later, a large group of females stopped in front of our home, loudly conversing, and I had to go out to tell them that a family lives here and we were trying to sleep. I could hear noise from parties throughout the neighborhood, and the groups of loud people continued past our house until after 2 a.m. Loud parties and screaming people could be heard throughout our neighborhood for the entire weekend. My daughter, son-in-law, and our young grandchildren are staying with us while their house near Sinsheimer Park is being remodeled and they have been absolutely stunned by the level of noise and craziness in our neighborhood. My daughter commented that it's like Las Vegas. She works from home as the Director for a large commercial contractor, overseeing the design and development of data centers for Meta, and also teaches at Cal Poly (as does our son-in-law) while raising two small children, so the noise has been challenging for them, as well. This weekend she continually commented about the large number of people openly drinking alcohol while SLOPD officers watched them walk by without taking any action. She said SLOPD would cite open containers when she was a student at Cal Poly more than a decade ago. They also both commented about the location of fraternities, and how they were located closer to campus when they were students there. It is remarkable and unbelievable that things have evolved to such an extremely intolerable state in our neighborhood. How did this happen? I met with Community Development Director, Timmi Tway and Code Enforcement Supervisor, John Mezzapesa on 11/8/2023 and gave them an extensive report with documentation for every illegal fraternity house in San Luis Obispo. There are 75 documented fraternity houses in the city, and 57 of those are illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. The remaining 18 (75 – 57 = 18) are in 16 R-3 and R-4 zones, but only seven of those have Use Permits to operate legally. The Use Permits prohibit parties after 10 p.m., even though they are in higher-density zones. Therefore, it is illogical that the fraternities have been allowed to operate as they have in R-1 and R-2 zones. Use Permits for new fraternities were issued as recently as 2013, under the direction of the Community Development Director. I believe Derek Johnson was the Community Development Director in 2013. When the roof collapsed in an R-2 residential zone at 348 Hathway during St. Fratty’s Day 2015, it was reported by Cal Poly that it happened at a fraternity. It was also reported to the city, through Cal Poly’s investigation of the incident, that other fraternities were operating on Hathway that day. It was simple for me to find the locations of the illegal fraternities by looking at their social media posts advertising their rush activities. The SLOPD and Christine Wallace have also told me that they are aware of several fraternity houses in our neighborhood. Why didn’t the city intervene to stop the proliferation of illegal fraternities then, when they knew they were operating illegally, in violation of the SLOMC and Zoning Regulations in 2015? Since then, more and more fraternities have crept further into the R-1 and R-2 residential neighborhoods and have completely overtaken Alta Vista! It’s crazy that the city has allowed this to happen. What is the city doing now, since I've provided indisputable evidence of the addresses of illegal fraternities in R-1 and R-2 zones? SLOPD’s lack of enforcement of the noise ordinance in our neighborhood has added insult to injury. Please do something to encourage SLOPD to enforce the noise ordinance and get the illegal fraternities out of our neighborhood. I am very, very worried about St. Fratty’s Day because many of the illegal fraternities have parties and for the past two years, SLOPD was unable to control the parties or the crowd of thousands of intoxicated college-aged people who overtook our neighborhood. Are you taking action to prevent the large crowds of people from overtaking the streets? Will SLOPD be accessing the loud parties to cite them, or will they remain outside of the street party takeover for hours until it burns itself out, as they did last year? Please help me understand what the city is doing to prevent this from happening for a third year in a row. Thank you for your help. We don't know where else to turn. I've attached a portion of the video surveillance from SLOPD Officer Stevens for your reference. I also have videos of some of the loud parties that were not cited this weekend, if you are interested. Please help us end this nightmare so we can enjoy our weekends and get adequate rest. Sincerely, Kathie Walker SLOPD comments on noise.mp4 The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. 17 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Monday, February 5, 2024 7:43 AM To:Maya Katherine Fornera Subject:Re: Homeless reduction program interest Hi Maya, It was nice to meet you. Yes, we have quite a bit of information about our work on preventing and reducing homelessness here. https://www.slocity.org/living/neighborhood/homelessness/strategic-planning , Please let me know if you have more questions after you've read our homelessness strategic plan. Also in our council meeting this tuesday, we will be going over our mid-year budget. There is an update on our major city goals, including housing and homelessness. Check it out. https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=4743deb6-6f84-486e-a7b0- 45d38e526da9&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=26&Tab=attachments Have a great day! Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E estewart@slocity.org T 805.783.7838 C 805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Maya Katherine Fornera < Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 7:38 PM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Homeless reduction program interest This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Mayor Stewart! I hope you're doing well! This is Maya Fornera, and I was emailing to inquire about the homeless reduction program you mentioned during the meeting on Tuesday. Is there a place I should go to for more information on it or do you know the dates or opportunities it offers? I want to learn more about it first but I definitely have some ideas! Thank you for your time, have a wonderful night! From Maya Fornera 18 Get Outlook for iOS 35 From:Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu> Sent:Friday, February 2, 2024 9:57 AM To:Stewart, Erica A; Courtney Leigh Kienow Cc:Purrington, Teresa Subject:RE: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Attachments:CP_FSL_EVENT_REGISTRATION_PROCEDURE_21-22_AY.pdf Erica, Thank you for meeting with us this morning. I wanted to follow up with a copy of our Cal Poly FSL Event Registration Procedure in attachment. Also a slight correction – the Greek Leadership Institute is not tomorrow, it is Sunday (Feb 4) on campus, and Code Enforcement will be meeting with the students in the afternoon to share their existing use permits and go over processes, expectations and answer questions. I’m looking forward to this, as it is the first time it has happened since I have been part of this area (10 years now). I am hoping this can be a regular part of our connection annually with new student leaders, but we’ll assess after this weekend. Jason Mockford (he, him, his) Senior Director, Leadership & Service | Student Affairs | Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0208 | leadandserve.calpoly.edu | 805-756- 2476 Futuristic • Strategic • Relator • Ideation • Adaptability From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 8:39 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Perfect. Happy to meet with you on campus Friday at 8 AM. See you then! Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Twitter Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 6:04:14 AM 36 To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Yes! We can both do 8-9. Want to meet at scout on campus? Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2024, at 3:09 PM, Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Courtney, I appreciate both you and Jason being willing to meet. Unfortunately, I have meetings at those times. If you are able to meet between 8-9:30 or 330 and 5pm on 2/2. Let me know if those times will work. Otherwise, I’m copying Teresa Purrington, and she can help us find some time. Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Twitter Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:39 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Hi again Erica, Jason Mockford and I would definitely appreciate meeting with you on this. We are both available: Friday 2/2 from 10-11 and noon-1pm. Do either of those work for you? If not, we’ll try to get more creative. Courtney Kienow Director of Community Relations Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Date: Monday, January 29, 2024 at 7:41 AM 37 To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Good morning, Courtney! I hope you had a great weekend, and had some time to enjoy the beautiful weather. Please see below. There is a lot in this email from Kathie Walker. Can we touch base this week to help me understand what’s allowed on the IFC, Panhellenic, and USFC front from the Cal Poly point of view? I will touch base with Derek and Timmi as well. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Twitter Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: kathie walker < Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 1:16:44 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Erica, Jan, Andy, Michelle, and Emily, As you know from my previous correspondence, I live on with my family, and we have struggled with the constant noise from loud parties on weekends when Cal Poly is in session, especially at illegal fraternity houses. There are at least 40 documented chapter and satellite fraternity houses in the R-1 and R-2 residential zones in our small Alta Vista neighborhood, in violation of the SLOMC and Land Use Regulations. Their operation as a fraternity is documented on their social media posts and confirmed by Cal Poly’s report published online per AB 524, The Sorority and Fraternity Transparency Act. When lower Monterey Heights is included, there are at least 50 documented chapter and satellite fraternity houses in R-1 and R-2 zones in those two small neighborhoods. These illegal fraternity houses make up 15% of the total homes in Alta Vista or three out of every 20 homes! Please try to imagine how you would feel if three out of every 20 homes in your neighborhood were operating as fraternity houses with loud parties, constant traffic, booming music, screaming profanities, loud guests coming and going at all hours, trash, et cetera. It has gravely affected our family, including my husband’s ability to be rested for his safety-critical job, flying a medevac helicopter. 38 Historically, I or my husband would call SLOPD dispatch to report loud (mostly fraternity) parties that we could hear from our house, and the calls would be cleared by SLOPD as “Negative Violation” or “Unable to Locate”. Therefore, I began going to the party to get a physical address and take a video of the party so I could prove that it was a noise violation. Still, parties were regularly cleared as “Negative Violation” or “Unable to Locate” which is extremely frustrating. The mistakes were acknowledged by SLOPD Sgt. Bryan Treanor and Sgt. Aaron Schafer after they saw the videos a year ago, but otherwise I have largely been dismissed by SLOPD leadership. I have emailed, spoken on the phone, and personally met with SLOPD “leadership” and nothing has changed, except for a brief period in March 2023, when Bryan Treanor and Aaron Schafer were acting as Night Watch Commanders. Otherwise, it’s been a disaster. The parties in our neighborhood happen every Thursday, Friday, and Saturday when Cal Poly is in session, therefore SLOPD dispatch is, unfortunately, familiar with me, and I am familiar with them. Obviously, I wish our home was not surrounded by loud and disruptive fraternity houses which, by their very nature are recognized to be disruptive and is the reason they require a Use Permit to operate only in an R-3 and R-4 zone. And obviously, I wish that we were in a situation that allowed us to peacefully enjoy our property during the weekends. It does not bring me any joy to get out of bed, follow the sound of booming music and screaming people to locate the party, take video, and call SLOPD dispatch to report the party. In fact, the ongoing noise from the fraternities is a nightmare and is causing so much anxiety and sleeplessness that it is ruining our family’s lives. So, it was especially distressing to hear a SLOPD officer (Officer John Stevens) disparage me to someone and falsely claim that I “walk around the neighborhood looking for violations” to call into SLOPD dispatch. He said that I am “very persistent” and “will continue to call SLOPD if the call isn’t acted on.” Officer Stevens also said that Residents for Quality Neighborhoods will call in every single noise violation. Further, he said that the people who live in our neighborhood are “especially sensitive to noise” and “know the municipal code inside and out.” 1. I do not walk around my neighborhood looking for violations to call in. This statement diminishes the very real problem of our current living situation, surrounded by illegal fraternity houses that regularly have blow-out parties and other disruptive activities. If SLOPD did not repeatedly dismiss noisy party calls as “Negative Violation” and/or “Unable to Locate” I would not be in a position where I had to find the exact address and continually prove that these very real, disruptive parties are happening. Our neighborhood is small – ¼ mile by ¾ mile – and we can hear loud parties, especially with booming bass music, from blocks away. If we are affected, I feel it is within my purview to locate the party and call it into SLOPD. I should not be shamed by SLOPD for doing that! 2. I have never met or interacted with Officer Stevens and my contact with SLOPD has been with dispatchers, some members of SLOPD leadership, and Christine Wallace. Someone at SLOPD told Officer Stevens those things about me. Although I am persistent at times, the other things he said about me are not true. It makes me feel extremely uncomfortable to know that SLOPD leadership is talking about me in such a way. It is also inappropriate for Officer Stevens to say those things to a community member when responding to a call. 3. Our neighborhood is not “especially sensitive to noise”. I have lived in other areas of the city with neighbors who were intolerant of college students and kept track of when others brought their trash bins in, etc. It made me feel uncomfortable. I enjoy the college students in our community and the normal activities of a neighborhood. It is not normal for a lower-density residential neighborhood to have 15% of their houses as fraternities without any conditions, as are required for fraternities operating legally in R-3 and R-4 zones. They are disruptive and loud, and keep the residents awake at night. Residents in any residential neighborhood living under those conditions would be calling the police for help. It does not mean they are “especially sensitive”. It means that the noise and parties are especially disruptive! 39 Monday, 1/15/2024 was MLK, Jr. Day, which is a federal holiday. Our family looked forward to sleeping in that day. Our teenager has been slammed with a challenging workload with honors and AP classes at SLOHS and works 20-30 hours a week at a local restaurant so was especially happy that we had a morning to rest. At 7:45 a.m., we were woken by loud construction noise right outside of our bedroom windows because the investor who owns the property next door hired a contractor to replace and update their sliding door that is about 10’ from our house. There is currently no fence between our properties. I thought that the SLOMC prohibits construction on Sundays and federal holidays, so I got up to look up the ordinance. Then I called SLOPD dispatch about the noise. Officer Stevens responded and told the contractor that construction noise is not allowed on a federal holiday, so they need to stop. He told them “a neighbor who walks the neighborhood looking for violations” called in the noise, and SLOPD doesn’t “go out looking for these” noise violations. He repeatedly apologized and said “the neighbor is persistent and will continue to call SLOPD all day” if they don’t stop the construction. He also said RQN is a group that calls in every single noise violation. He did not cite the contractor for the construction noise. After Officer Stevens left, the contractors continued to use power tools to install a new sliding door for 30-45 minutes. I was confused about why the noise hadn’t stopped and called SLOPD again. The dispatcher told me that the officer said, “it is an emergency repair” and they would be finished in 30 minutes. I told her it was not an emergency repair, and the property owner was just upgrading the sliding door and the construction noise had been going on for a long time so we couldn't sleep. I was dismissed by the dispatcher. The noise continued to keep us awake and I called SLOPD a THIRD time. The dispatcher said she would open the call again. Officer Stevens returned and issued a citation but told the contractor that he could appeal the citation and claim it was an emergency repair. It was not an emergency repair and Officer Stevens knew that, according to the conversation that took place. The contractor said Monday was the only day he was available to do the repair so that’s why he did it that morning. The contractor gestured toward our house and told Officer Stevens that he knew it was us who called SLOPD. I did not realize these conversations took place until I reviewed our video surveillance later that day, which shows the loud construction for nearly two hours and the conversations between the contractor and SLOPD Officer Stevens. I am not sure if I have already shared with you that I was targeted by one of the fraternity guys last academic school year. The day after they were issued a noise citation, he began cyberstalking me by posting ads on Craigslist for people to come to my home for “free scrap metal”, opened an account on PornHub using my name, phone number, and email, made various appointments for people from several religious organizations to come to my home including representatives from Latter Day Saints, Jehovah's Witness, and Church of Scientology, and spammed me with countless emails and phone calls from dozens of organizations and businesses such as car dealerships. I filed a police report and remained fearful that someone would show up at my door for any number of reasons, such as a dating-type situation, and that I would be in danger. Hearing Officer Stevens say these things and realizing that he is likely repeating the same thing to the fraternity guys when he responds to noisy parties, made me fearful that one of them may target me and seek revenge if they see me walking toward a noisy party in the neighborhood. I do not appreciate the message that Officer Stevens, through someone else at SLOPD, is spreading about me, which makes me feel unsafe in my own home. 40 This past weekend was the Winter Rush for Cal Poly’s fraternities and while most of you may feel relaxed and rested by the weekend, our family feels that we’ve been through a war. We are exhausted and feel defeated. The loud parties started on Thursday and continued, day and night, throughout the weekend. An illegal fraternity five doors down at 1237 Fredericks Street had a huge party with over 100 people on Friday night. We could hear country music and people screaming from our house. I walked down and took a video, then called SLOPD at around 10 p.m. Forty-five minutes later, the music was still blaring, and people were still screaming. I went back down to the party and, feeling frustrated that SLOPD did not break it up, I asked the four guys guarding the front door if they realized a family lived nearby and we could hear their loud party. They said that SLOPD had already been there and told them the noise did not cross the property line and they were fine. (The noise definitely crossed the property line, as shown in my video taken at 10 p.m.) I told them it wasn’t fine, and they had five minutes to shut down the party or I would call SLOPD and would wait for them to get there. After some back and forth, they went in and turned down the music and people flooded out of the house and left in every direction, so I went home. Later, a large group of females stopped in front of our home, loudly conversing, and I had to go out to tell them that a family lives here and we were trying to sleep. I could hear noise from parties throughout the neighborhood, and the groups of loud people continued past our house until after 2 a.m. Loud parties and screaming people could be heard throughout our neighborhood for the entire weekend. My daughter, son-in-law, and our young grandchildren are staying with us while their house near Sinsheimer Park is being remodeled and they have been absolutely stunned by the level of noise and craziness in our neighborhood. My daughter commented that it's like Las Vegas. She works from home as the Director for a large commercial contractor, overseeing the design and development of data centers for Meta, and also teaches at Cal Poly (as does our son-in-law) while raising two small children, so the noise has been challenging for them, as well. This weekend she continually commented about the large number of people openly drinking alcohol while SLOPD officers watched them walk by without taking any action. She said SLOPD would cite open containers when she was a student at Cal Poly more than a decade ago. They also both commented about the location of fraternities, and how they were located closer to campus when they were students there. It is remarkable and unbelievable that things have evolved to such an extremely intolerable state in our neighborhood. How did this happen? I met with Community Development Director, Timmi Tway and Code Enforcement Supervisor, John Mezzapesa on 11/8/2023 and gave them an extensive report with documentation for every illegal fraternity house in San Luis Obispo. There are 75 documented fraternity houses in the city, and 57 of those are illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. The remaining 18 (75 – 57 = 18) are in R-3 and R-4 zones, but only seven of those have Use Permits to operate legally. The Use Permits prohibit parties after 10 p.m., even though they are in higher-density zones. Therefore, it is illogical that the fraternities have been allowed to operate as they have in R-1 and R-2 zones. Use Permits for new fraternities were issued as recently as 2013, under the direction of the Community Development Director. I believe Derek Johnson was the Community Development Director in 2013. When the roof collapsed in an R-2 residential zone at 348 Hathway during St. Fratty’s Day 2015, it was reported by Cal Poly that it happened at a fraternity. It was also reported to the city, through Cal Poly’s investigation of the incident, that other fraternities were operating on Hathway that day. It was simple for me to find the locations of the illegal fraternities by looking at their social media posts advertising their rush activities. The SLOPD and Christine Wallace have also told me that they are aware of several fraternity houses in our neighborhood. Why didn’t the city intervene to stop the proliferation of illegal fraternities then, when they knew they were operating illegally, in violation of the SLOMC and Zoning Regulations in 2015? Since then, more and more fraternities have crept further into the R-1 and R-2 residential neighborhoods and have 41 completely overtaken Alta Vista! It’s crazy that the city has allowed this to happen. What is the city doing now, since I've provided indisputable evidence of the addresses of illegal fraternities in R-1 and R-2 zones? SLOPD’s lack of enforcement of the noise ordinance in our neighborhood has added insult to injury. Please do something to encourage SLOPD to enforce the noise ordinance and get the illegal fraternities out of our neighborhood. I am very, very worried about St. Fratty’s Day because many of the illegal fraternities have parties and for the past two years, SLOPD was unable to control the parties or the crowd of thousands of intoxicated college-aged people who overtook our neighborhood. Are you taking action to prevent the large crowds of people from overtaking the streets? Will SLOPD be accessing the loud parties to cite them, or will they remain outside of the street party takeover for hours until it burns itself out, as they did last year? Please help me understand what the city is doing to prevent this from happening for a third year in a row. Thank you for your help. We don't know where else to turn. I've attached a portion of the video surveillance from SLOPD Officer Stevens for your reference. I also have videos of some of the loud parties that were not cited this weekend, if you are interested. Please help us end this nightmare so we can enjoy our weekends and get adequate rest. Sincerely, Kathie Walker SLOPD comments on noise.mp4 The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. EVENT REGISTRATION PROCEDURE All members of Cal Poly-affiliated fraternities and sororities, and the Interfraternity Council, the Panhellenic Council, and the United Sorority & Fraternity Council at Cal Poly (collectively the “Fraternity and Sorority Community”), shall abide by all University policies and federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including those that govern the use, distribution, and consumption of alcohol. This Event Registration Procedure sets forth procedures designed to provide a safe social atmosphere for members of the Greek Community and their guests, while allowing them to exercise the personal responsibility expected of each of them. The following objectives are essential to achieving this aim: • To encourage social responsibility in all members, with emphasis on safety and risk management; • To encourage responsibility in the use of alcohol and thereby reduce the risks associated with alcohol misuse at parties; • To increase the safety of everyone in attendance at chapter-sponsored events with and without alcohol; • To support the ideals and values on which fraternities and sororities are founded; • To practice self-governance as a Fraternity and Sorority Life Community; • To educate the general membership of the Fraternity and Sorority Life community about the importance of risk management. 1 The University does not accept legal liability for the activities engaged in by fraternities and sororities, and their members. Table of Contents Article I - What defines an event? Article II - Legal Article III - Events with Alcohol Present Article IV - Events without Alcohol Present Article V - Locations Article VI - Registration Process Article VII - Judicial Article VIII - Amnesty Article IX - Procedure Revision Article I - What defines an event? A. An “event” for the purposes of this document is any activity sponsored or endorsed by the organization/chapter including those that occur on and off chapter premises. Article II – Legal A. Any event as defined above must be compliant with all applicable laws, including but not limited to the below requirements: a. The organization, members and guests must comply with all federal, state, and local laws. No person under the legal drinking age my possess, consume, provide or be provided alcoholic beverages b. Organizations, members and guests must follow the federal law regarding illegal drugs and controlled substances. No persons may possess, use, provide, distribute, sell and or manufacture illegal drugs or other controlled substances while on organizational/ chapter premises or at any activity or event which is sponsored or endorsed by the chapter B. Laws local to San Luis Obispo are also enforced with events, including: a. Noise Ordinance i. 7 A.M. to 10 P.M.: Noise that can be heard 50 feet from the property line is a violation ii. 10 P.M. to 7 A.M.: Noise that can be heard across the property line is a violation b. Safety Enhancement Zones i. Fines are doubled for the following violations: 1. Noise 2. Unruly Gathering 3. Social Host Liability 4. Public Urination 5. Open Container ii. Designated times for Safety Enhancement Zones may vary, but typically occur during: 1. Mardi Gras (Thursday - Wednesday) 2. St. Patrick’s Day 3. Halloween 4. “WOW’ Week Article III – Events with Alcohol Present A. Guest Lists and Sober Monitors a. Any event where alcohol is present is required to be a closed event, with guest lists submitted to the FSL office by the deadline (see Article VI) b. Attendance by non-members at any event where alcohol is present must be by invitation only by the organization. Chapters must utilize the guest list template provided by the FSL Office. Attendance at events where alcohol is present is limited to a guest-to-member ratio of 2:1 and must not exceed local fire or building code capacity of the organizational/chapter premises or host venue. c. Any event with alcohol present is also required to have sober monitors present, with quantity based on the number of guests in attendance. i. Three sober monitors (including one from the Executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum. ii. For every 40 guests invited to the event, another sober monitor will be required iii. First year members who have been in the chapter for at least one quarter and are initiated members, can serve as sober monitors if the following is in place: 1. Required attendance at one of the annual Social Risk Management workshops hosted the FSL office PRIOR to becoming eligible to serve as a sober monitor 2. Procedures in place attached to the risk management plan, that supports first year students during the event, should conflict arise 3. No more than 30 percent of sober monitors can be first year members B. Any event where alcohol is present can only occur from a. 5:00pm on Thursday until 1:00am on Friday, when Friday is an academic holiday b. 5:00pm on Friday until 1:00am on Saturday c. 9:00am on Saturday until 1:00am on Sunday d. 9:00am on Sunday until 1:00am on Monday, when Monday is an academic holiday C. Events with alcohol cannot occur until after the formal recruitment period is over (during quarters where there is a formal recruitment period) unless at a third -party vendor and the event is closed with no potential new members in attendance and follows all event registration guidelines. D. Events with alcohol are prohibited from lasting longer than five hours continuously E. Sources of Alcohol a. Alcoholic beverages must either be: i. Provided and sold by a licensed and insured third -party vendor, e.g., restaurant, bar, caterer, etc.) or ii. Brought by the individual members and guests through a bring your own beverage system. b. Common sources of alcohol, including bulk quantities, which are not being served by a licensed and insured third -party vendor, are prohibited (i.e. amounts of alcohol greater than what a reasonable person should consume over the duration of the event) c. The presence of alcohol products above 15% alcohol by volume (ABV) is prohibited on any organizational/chapter premises or at any event, except when served at an event by a licensed and insured third party vendor. d. Alcoholic beverages must not be purchased with organizational/chapter funds or funds pooled by members or guests (e.g., admission fees, cover fees, collecting funds through digital apps, etc.) F. Bring Your Own Beverage a. Only those of legal drinking age in California may bring and consume alcohol b. Permitted alcohol can only be made available in central common living areas managed by sober monitors designated by the host chapter c. Individuals of legal drinking age may bring beer totaling no more than 72 ounces (equivalent to a six pack of 12 oz beers) or one bottle (750 ml) of wine to the event G. Drinking Games a. No shots, drinking games, or other activities that encourage inappropriate or other rapid consumption or high-risk drinking behaviors shall be allowed. i. The definition of drinking games includes but is not limited to the consumption of shots of alcohol, liquor or alcoholic beverages; the practice of consuming shots equating to on e’s age; ”beer pong,” “century club,” “beer die”, ”dares;” or any other activity involving the consumption of alcohol which involves duress or encouragement related to the consumption of alcohol H. Registration a. Events with alcohol are required to be registered with the FSL office prior to their occurrence and with documents submitted prior to the required deadlines (further outlined in Article VI) Article IV – Events without Alcohol Present A. Guest Lists and Sober Monitors a. Guest lists and sober monitors are not required for events where alcohol is not present, but are encouraged B. Registration a. Events without alcohol are required to be registered with the FSL office prior to their occurrence and with documents submitted prior to the required deadlines (further outlined in Article VI) Article V – Locations A. All off-campus events with alcohol must be held at either the chapter facility, satellite house (which is defined as a house that is registered as a satellite house and hosts chapter events), or a venue under third party management that is not legally associated with the chapter in any capacity (‘third-party venue’). a. Satellite houses must be registered at the beginning of each academic year, and will remain registered until the end of the respective quarter. B. For all events with alcohol that are located at a third -party venue, a copy of the contract with the chapter and event management company or third -party venue must be submitted with the party registration. Article VI – Registration Process A. The process of online events with alcohol registration must begin at least 10 days before the date of the event. B. Deadlines for completion of registration are every Thursday by 12:00pm the weekend of the event. C. A final follow up guest list must be submitted by 12:00 noon Monday following the event with alcohol, with the full names of all attendees and birthdates of all guests who received wristbands for alcohol consumption. a. No future events with alcohol will be reviewed until this requirement is fulfilled D. The chapter’s risk manager must complete a post -event review, which is to be submitted to Cal Poly Fraternity and Sorority Life by 12:00 Noon the Wednesday following the event with alcohol. All sober monitors and sober executive members will contribute to this review. For events with alcohol where there may be more than one chapter acting as the event host, each chapter must complete a post-event form. a. No future events with alcohol will be reviewed until this requirement is fulfilled E. Failure to follow these requirements may subject the chapter and/or its individual members to student discipline. Article VII – Judicial A. Failure to follow these procedures will be reviewed by the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities (OSRR) and may be subject to sanctions. B. It is recognized that this procedure cannot address, in specific fashion, all possible social situations that may occur. When this procedure is not specific on a particular point, the Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic Council, and United Sorority & Fraternity Council chapters and their members are expected to conduct their events and themselves in the spirit of social responsibility expressed in this procedure. C. Council judicial boards can also adjudicate if deemed necessary by the OSRR. Article VIII – Amnesty A. The university’s primary concern is for the health, welfare, and safety of all students. As such, in cases of significant intoxication as a result of alcohol or other substances, the university encourages students to seek medical assistance for themselves and/or others. Any student who assists in seeking medical attention for a person in need, will not be subject to disciplinary action for conduct in violation of this policy. Article IX – Procedure Revision A. This procedure may be revised at any time by the Fraternity & Sorority Life office, OSRR and Dean of Students. B. This procedure will be reviewed during summer quarter, or at the discretion of the Dean of Students staff, and any revisions will be sent to members of fraternities and sororities immediately, and will be effective the first day of the following fall quarter. C. In the event of a mid-academic year review, any revisions will be sent to members of fraternities and sororities immediately upon implementation. 42 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Friday, February 2, 2024 8:19 AM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Subject:Fwd: Another Loud Frat Party Tonight, Tuesday, 7th night in a row in our neighborhood Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: Sandra Rowley < Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 1:46:44 PM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org> Cc: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Another Loud Frat Party Tonight, Tuesday, 7th night in a row in our neighborhood This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Mayor and Council Members, Apparently it was Mr. Jenkins' intention to also send his email to you - and in checking with him, this was the case. In fact he thought you were all included in Chief Scott's email and, thus, in his reply-all response. Also, I believe it was improper for the Chief to imply that Mrs. Walker should ask for officers to come to her house in lieu of taking videos of the parties. Videos substantiate the level of the disturbances, demonstrate the spotty enforcement of the noise ordinance in this area, and make it less likely that Mrs. Walker will be categorized as "overly sensitive." Sincerely, Sandra Rowley ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Stew Jenkins < To: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Cc: kathie walker < ; Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn < ; Brett Cross < ; Karen Adler < ; Victoria Wood < ; Mila Vujovich-LaBarre < ; Mezzapesa, John <jmezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <ttway@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 at 09:32:32 AM PST 43 Subject: Re: Another Loud Frat Party Tonight, Tuesday, 7th night in a row in our neighborhood Dear Chief Scott, Council & Staff. "Continuing the Dialogue." "Diligently working toward collaborative solutions." "Partnering with you to more effectively respond to noise complaints." Clearly, residents are tired of this lip service, and ordinances that are not enforced but serve only as window dressing on the loud riotous activity visible outside the window. Ms. Walker and residents, to paraphrase Tobie Keith, want a little less talk and a lot more action. All the Best, Stew Jenkins Law Office of Stewart D. Jenkins Election Law, Estate Planning, Real Estate Law 1336 Morro Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 541-5763 Cell: ( Fax: (805) 547-1608 E-Mail: Law Office Web: www.stewjenkins.com On 2024-01-31 12:16, Scott, Rick wrote: > BCC CC: > > Ms. Walker, > > This response is to your email yesterday evening and the one over the > weekend to Council and other staff members. I sincerely appreciate you > reaching out and continuing the dialogue on your concerns in the > recent emails regarding Fraternities and your experiences with the San > Luis Obispo Police Department. As always, I appreciate the opportunity > to address your perspectives and shed light on our ongoing efforts to > address community issues. > > To reiterate, we have been diligently working towards collaborative > solutions for the challenges you have raised over time, to include > partnering with you to more effectively respond to noise complaints, > as well as change our city ordinance to provide more tools over > holidays. We are committed to fostering a constructive relationship > and always seeking mutually beneficial resolutions. > > I realize you have been a resident in Alta vista for many years > struggling with this issue, but I also want to emphasize the progress > we've made in addressing noise complaints and violations since 2010. > The significant and continual drop in such incidents is a testament to > our partnership and the focus by the city. This is especially > noteworthy considering the transitory nature of the student > population, which changes every four years. It underscores our > dedication to maintaining a harmonious coexistence between university > activities and the surrounding community. Even with the changes in > behavior during Covid, complaints and incidents continue to decline. > However, this does not mean there is not a problem, but the city’s > party registration and SNAP program are having a positive impact. > While zero tolerance has been suggested, police officers must use > judgment and discretion in responding to noise calls, as they navigate > the complex landscape of other crimes occurring in the city, to ensure > we are facilitating equitable outcomes. We take your concerns most > seriously and are committed to always exploring and implementing > effective solutions to address these issues. > 44 > While videos are helpful, I would ask that in the future please meet > the officer at your property so we can better understand the noise as > you and your family are experiencing it. This approach allows them to > better understand the nature and context of the disturbance, enabling > a more informed and again equitable response. Often, officers can > discern nuances from your property that may not be apparent from the > street, particularly if the source of the noise emanates from a > backyard or private area. > > The city is aware of the zoning concerns you have mentioned with > sorority and fraternity houses operating in the neighborhood. I > understand the City’s Code Enforcement team is working on a plan to > address the problem and I believe you have been in communication with > the CDD Director, Timmi Tway, who has provided information. > > The department remains committed to collaborative relationships with > all of our community members as we confront unique and difficult > challenges for the highest quality of life possible within our SLO > community. Your feedback and insights are valuable as we work to > change behavior and improve quality of life for everyone. > > Thank you, > > Rick Scott > Police Chief > [1] > Police Department > 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 > E rscott@slocity.org > T 805.781.7256 > slocity.org [1] > [2] [3] [4] > Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications [5] > > This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for > the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, > re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any > action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other > than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in > error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any > computer. > > From: kathie walker < > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 11:44 PM > To: Johnson, Derek <djohnson@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick > <rscott@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; > E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan > <jmarx@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, > Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle > <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Dietrick, > Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John > <JMezzape@slocity.org> > Cc: Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn < ; > Brett Cross < ; Stewjenkins Info > < ; Karen Adler < ; Victoria > Wood < ; Mila Vujovich-LaBarre > < > Subject: Another Loud Frat Party Tonight, Tuesday, 7th night in a row > in our neighborhood > > This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to > open attachments, click links, or respond. > 45 > ------------------------- > > You've already heard my repeated pleas, politely and frustratedly, and > everything in between. I am out of words. Please watch the video of > another loud party tonight (Tuesday) on the 7th straight night in a > row of Cal Poly's fraternity rush at the illegal fraternities in our > neighborhood. This property at 348 & 350 Hathway has been on the > city's radar for over a decade. It's been issued about 20 noise > citations since 2022 and has evaded dozens more despite loud > disruptive parties that violated the noise ordinance. Please do > something to stop this madness. > > Thank you, > > Kathie > > 348 Hathway another party 1.30.2024.mp4 [6] > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] https://www.slocity.org > [2] https://www.facebook.com/cityofslo > [3] https://www.instagram.com/cityofslo > [4] https://www.twitter.com/city_of_slo > [5] https://www.slocity.org/how-do-i/register/e-notifications/ > [6] > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-hHql2Z08DqVwgkkRkkYaIvXGOV0kS3i/view?usp=drive_web 46 From:Maya Katherine Fornera < Sent:Thursday, February 1, 2024 7:38 PM To:Stewart, Erica A Subject:Homeless reduction program interest This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Mayor Stewart! I hope you're doing well! This is Maya Fornera, and I was emailing to inquire about the homeless reduction program you mentioned during the meeting on Tuesday. Is there a place I should go to for more information on it or do you know the dates or opportunities it offers? I want to learn more about it first but I definitely have some ideas! Thank you for your time, have a wonderful night! From Maya Fornera Get Outlook for iOS 67 From:Purrington, Teresa Sent:Monday, January 29, 2024 3:55 PM To:Reagan J. Denny; Stewart, Erica A Cc:Michelle Crawford; Meghan Schuler-Jones Subject:RE: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request Thank you Reagan. I have added this to Mayor Stewart’s calendar. Please note she will be there at 6:10 PM. Thanks, Teresa Purrington City Clerk From: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 3:53 PM To: Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request Hello there, Both dates are available, but April 8th would be preferable. Thank you for helping coordinate this! Best, REAGAN DENNY Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Agricultural Engineering Society Secretary ASI Board of Directors CAFES Representative, External Affairs Chair _____ Cell: From: Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:07 AM To: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu> Subject: RE: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request Hi Reagan, Mayor Stewart can meet either April 8th or April 22nd. Please let me know which works best for your group. Thank you, Teresa Purrington City Clerk From: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 10:11 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request 68 Hello, Thanks again for your willingness to meet with student government. Unfortunately, both dates you provided are Tuesdays, and our Board Workshops are on Mondays. Would we be able to find a date on a Monday that works with your teaching schedule? Best, Reagan REAGAN DENNY Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Agricultural Engineering Society Secretary ASI Board of Directors CAFES Representative, External Affairs Chair _____ Cell: From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 9:36 AM To: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request Hi Reagan, You are welcome. My first choice would be April 2, and second choice would be April 9, are either of those possible? Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E estewart@slocity.org T 805.783.7838 C 805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 9:15 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request Good morning, 69 Thank you for being so willing to help develop our generation of leaders. How about we plan on April 15 around 6:10, which is the Monday of week 3? We are flexible on this date, so if there is a Monday that works better for you, please let me know and we would be happy to accommodate! Again, we really appreciate your continued support of ASI and student leaders. Looking forward to continuing to work together to maintain the relationship between SLO and Cal Poly! REAGAN DENNY Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Agricultural Engineering Society Secretary ASI Board of Directors CAFES Representative, External Affairs Chair _____ Cell: From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 3:16 PM To: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request Hi Regan, Thank you so much for reaching out. I’m looking forward to seeing the ASI staff on Tuesday. I really appreciate yourself and other members of the ASI team coming to the city, Council meetings and working with the SLOP D and/or SCLC. I look forward to continuing to work with you and your team. As far as the board meeting on Mondays, I could meet around 6:10. I will be teaching class from 4:10 to 6 PM in spring quarter. Let me know if that works for you. All the best, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications From: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 9:55:22 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> 70 Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu> Subject: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Mayor Stewart, On behalf of the Associated Students, Inc. (ASI) at California Polytechnic State University and ASI Student Government, we appreciate your service, leadership, and dedication to the San Luis Obispo community. As a former ASI President yourself, you are aware that the role of ASI Student Government is to represent and advocate at the campus, community, and state-wide level on behalf of over 20,000 Cal Poly students. As student leaders this year, we are committed to upholding that responsibility and enhancing the student experience both on- and off-campus. This year, we have prioritized connecting with our community, through creating and maintaining strong working relationships w ith those who serve it. We hope that our attendance at City Council meetings and coordination with the San Luis Obispo Police Department on safety enhancement zones has demonstrated our desire to maintain open lines of communication between Cal Poly students and the city of San Luis Obispo. Students represent a large portion of the population in the city of San Luis Obispo, and we believe that a collaborative partnership and engaged relationship will enhance our ability to mutually serve our community. In the spirit of engaging in a collaborative partnership between student leaders and the city, the ASI External Affairs commi ttee has re-envisioned the ASI Meet Your Representatives event series. The new format will be geared more toward introducing student leaders to community leaders via student-government-centered events. Meet Your Representatives will be held during ASI Board of Directors Workshops, which are held every Monday during the academic year between 5 – 7 p.m. Board Workshops are open to the public and attended by all members of the ASI Board of Directors. If you are interested and available to attend an upcoming workshop in either winter or spring quarter, we would love to have you! If you have any questions or would like to schedule a date, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your service to the city of San Luis Obispo, your support of ASI student leaders, and your consideration to participate in this event. Respectfully, REAGAN DENNY Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Agricultural Engineering Society Secretary ASI Board of Directors CAFES Representative, External Affairs Chair _____ Cell: 103 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Monday, January 22, 2024 9:33 PM To:Tracy L. Watson Subject:Re: Transit Innovation Study & CAPP Program Thank you, Tracy! Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E estewart@slocity.org T 805.783.7838 C 805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: sclc-request@calpoly.edu <sclc-request@calpoly.edu> on behalf of Tracy L. Watson <twatson@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 10:02 AM To: sclc@calpoly.edu <sclc@calpoly.edu> Subject: Fw: Transit Innovation Study & CAPP Program This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hello SCLC, I am forwarding information on the Transit Innovation Study & CAPP Program as discussed in our last meeting, https://www.universitycitynews.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CAPP-Flyer-Northern.pdf See below for the Transit Innovation Study link. Tracy Watson She/Her Administrative Assistant II, Student Government Associated Students, Inc. California Polytechnic State University 1 Grand Ave. San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0675 P: 805-756-1292 | F: 805-756-6166 asi.calpoly.edu 104 Cal Poly sits on the traditional lands of the yak titʸu titʸu yak tiłhini Northern Chumash Tribe of San Luis Obispo County and Region. The yak titʸu titʸu yak tiłhini have a documented presence in this area for over 10,000 years. The tiłhini peoples have stewarded their ancestral and unceded homelands which include all of the cities, communities, federal and state open spaces within the San Luis Obispo County region. These homelands extend East into the Carrizo Plains toward Kern County, South to the Santa Maria River, North to Ragged Point, and West beyond the ocean’s shoreline in an unbroken chain of lineage, kinship, and culture. From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 3:26 PM To: Tracy L. Watson <twatson@calpoly.edu> Subject: Transit Innovation Study Hi Tracy, Please see the report that was discussed at the meeting today linked here: https://pub- slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=2ebd02f5-1ff8-425e-8327- 20cdd132ef99&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=28&Tab=attachments. If you could please pass that along to the group I would appreciate it! Greg Greg Hermann pronouns he/him/his Deputy City Manager City Administration 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ghermann@slocity.org T 805.781.7194 C 805.440.1330 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 Subject:DPN: Resonance Cultural Art Series Location:SLO Museum of Art 1010 Broad St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Start:Thu 1/25/2024 5:00 PM End:Thu 1/25/2024 6:30 PM Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Accepted Organizer:University Diversity & Inclusion This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Diversity Partners Network, Happy New Year! We trust this message finds you well and in good spirits as we embark on a promising Winter term. As part of our ongoing commitment to fostering community spaces rooted in diversity, equity, and inclusion, we are excited to extend an invitation to you for a special event in collaboration with the City of San Luis Obispo and the SLO Museum of Art. In lieu of our traditional Diversity Partner Network meeting for January, we are delighted to invite you to a thought- provoking Panel Discussion on Alisa Sikelianos-Carter's exhibition, "In Space & Splendor: A Topography of Wildness." This captivating event will be moderated by the esteemed Dr. Denise Isom. The panel discussion will delve into the rich tapestry of mixed media works presented in the exhibition, exploring themes of Black mythologies, ancestral power, and the profound significance of Black stories and representation in art. This promises to be an engaging and enlightening conversation and we look forward to seeing you there. Appetizers and refreshments will be provided. 2 3 1 Subject:FW: ASI Executive Staff Meeting Location:Rec Center Training Room Start:Tue 1/30/2024 6:00 PM End:Tue 1/30/2024 7:00 PM Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Accepted Organizer:ASI Student Government This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. From: ASI Student Government <asistudentgovernment@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 12:44:26 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: ASI Student Government <asistudentgovernment@calpoly.edu>; Alexander Levine <alevin13@calpoly.edu>; Ananya Ajay Patil <apatil03@calpoly.edu>; Cristian Ulisses Reyes <creyes37@calpoly.edu>; Emily Prince <eprince@calpoly.edu>; Haley R. Duran <hrduran@calpoly.edu>; Samuel S. Andrews <ssandrew@calpoly.edu>; Sarai Gonzalez <sgonz153@calpoly.edu>; Sydney Lehr <salehr@calpoly.edu>; Tyler C. Coari <tcoari@calpoly.edu>; Olivia Louise Momberg <omomberg@calpoly.edu> Cc: Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu>; Ana Leon <aleon40@calpoly.edu>; Ashley Michelle Joseph <amjoseph@calpoly.edu>; Benjamin Mark Torres <btorre29@calpoly.edu>; Casey Jones <cjone157@calpoly.edu>; Dylan Jacob Marino <djmarino@calpoly.edu>; Hong Dang <hdang10@calpoly.edu>; Jack Nguyen <jnguy670@calpoly.edu>; Julian Tristan Hernandez <jhern563@calpoly.edu>; Kaylie Alejandra Becerra <kbecer04@calpoly.edu>; Khushi Sharma <ksharm21@calpoly.edu>; Leorie Yosian <lyosian@calpoly.edu>; Mason Miguel Ambrosio <mambro02@calpoly.edu>; Maya Katherine Fornera <mfornera@calpoly.edu>; Morgan Avery Raak <mraak@calpoly.edu>; Noah Louis Ness Cohen Garcia <ncohenga@calpoly.edu>; Olivia Ann Short <oshort@calpoly.edu>; Oscar Lara <olaralop@calpoly.edu>; Sam Finch <sfinch03@calpoly.edu>; Sam Otto <saotto@calpoly.edu>; Sean Trong Cao <scao15@calpoly.edu>; Suhani Vakhariya <vakhariy@calpoly.edu>; Taylor Lee Howe <thowe@calpoly.edu>; Trenton Counter <tcounter@calpoly.edu>; Weston Kenneth Patrick <wpatrick@calpoly.edu>; Yiming Luo <yluo11@calpoly.edu>; Trey Berberich Bernard <tbbernar@calpoly.edu>; ASI Photographer 1 <asiphotographer1@calpoly.edu>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Daniella Dawn Day <ddday@calpoly.edu> Subject: ASI Executive Staff Meeting 1 Subject:Canceled: Q&A Panel ASI Executive Staff Start:Tue 1/30/2024 5:00 PM End:Tue 1/30/2024 6:30 PM Show Time As:Free Recurrence:(none) Organizer:Stewart, Erica A Required Attendees:Erica Stewart (W); Erica Stewart (W) Call Handling Mode 2:2 I received confirmation that they would like you to be there at 6:00 pm. Deleting this appointment and leaving the one sent from ASI. Hi Teresa and Mayor Stewart, I hope that you are doing well! This is ASI President Sam Andrews from Cal Poly. I am following up here on a text conversation to invite Mayor Stewart to sit on a Q&A Panel at an upcoming meeting of the Executive Staff. The meeting would be on November 29th from 5:00 to 7:00, and we would love to host Mayor Stewart from 5:30 to 6:30. We expect the panel to end before the 6:30 mark, but plan to leave some time for networking/casual conversation. The Executive Staff Program is our way of providing students with an introduction to student government. It holds no requirement for election or commitment to holding any position, but offers interested students the chance to learn about student government/election processes and work on projects/initiatives directly alongside their elected representatives. The body is usually made up of 1 st year student and transfer students considering future positions in ASI. Thank you for your time, we are extremely excited to host you! Sincerely, Samuel Andrews 1 Subject:Fraternities/SLOPD Statements - Courtney/Jason/Mayor Stewart Location:Scout on Campus Start:Fri 2/2/2024 8:00 AM End:Fri 2/2/2024 9:00 AM Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Meeting organizer Organizer:Stewart, Erica A Required Attendees:Erica Stewart (W); Erica Stewart (W); Courtney Leigh Kienow; Jason Mockford Call Handling Mode 2:2 From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Date: Monday, January 29, 2024 at 7:41 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements Good morning, Courtney! I hope you had a great weekend, and had some time to enjoy the beautiful weather. Please see below. There is a lot in this email from Kathie Walker. Can we touch base this week to help me understand what’s allowed on the IFC, Panhellenic, and USFC front from the Cal Poly point of view? I will touch base with Derek and Timmi as well. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up fore-notifications 2 From: kathie walker < Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 1:16:44 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Pease, Andy <apease@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Fraternities and SLOPD Statements This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Erica, Jan, Andy, Michelle, and Emily, As you know from my previous correspondence, I live on with my family, and we have struggled with the constant noise from loud parties on weekends when Cal Poly is in session, especially at illegal fraternity houses. There are at least 40 documented chapter and satellite fraternity houses in the R-1 and R-2 residential zones in our small Alta Vista neighborhood, in violation of the SLOMC and Land Use Regulations. Their operation as a fraternity is documented on their social media posts and confirmed by Cal Poly’s report published online per AB 524, The Sorority and Fraternity Transparency Act. When lower Monterey Heights is included, there are at least 50 documented chapter and satellite fraternity houses in R-1 and R-2 zones in those two small neighborhoods. These illegal fraternity houses make up 15% of the total homes in Alta Vista or three out of every 20 homes! Please try to imagine how you would feel if three out of every 20 homes in your neighborhood were operating as fraternity houses with loud parties, constant traffic, booming music, screaming profanities, loud guests coming and going a t all hours, trash, et cetera. It has gravely affected our family, including my husband’s ability to be rested for his safety-critical job, flying a medevac helicopter. Historically, I or my husband would call SLOPD dispatch to report loud (mostly fraternity) parties that we could hear from our house, and the calls would be cleared by SLOPD as “Negative Violation” or “Unable to Locate”. Therefore, I began going to the party to get a physical address and take a video of the party so I could prove that it was a noise violation. Still, parties were regularly cleared as “Negative Violation” or “Unable to Locate” which is extremely frustrating. The mistakes were acknowledged by SLOPD Sgt. Bryan Treanor and Sgt. Aaron Schafer after they saw the videos a year ago, but otherwise I have largely been dismissed by SLOPD leadership. I have emailed, spoken on the phone, and personally met with SLOPD “leadership” and nothing has changed, except for a brief period in March 2023, when Bryan Treanor and Aaron Schafer were acting as Night Watch Commanders. Otherwise, it’s been a disaster. The parties in our neighborhood happen every Thursday, Friday, and Saturday when Cal Poly is in session, therefore SLOPD dispatch is, unfortunately, familiar with me, and I am familiar with them. Obviously, I wish our home was not surrounded by loud and disruptive fraternity houses which, by their very nature are recognized to be disruptive and is the reason they require a Use Permit to operate only in an R-3 and R-4 zone. And obviously, I wish that we were in a situation that allowed us to peacefully enjoy our property during the weekends. It does not bring me any joy to get out of bed, follow the sound of booming music and screaming people to locate the party, take video, and call SLOPD dispatch to report the party. In fact, the ongoing noise from the frat ernities is a nightmare and is causing so much anxiety and sleeplessness that it is ruining our family’s lives. So, it was especially distressing to hear a SLOPD officer (Officer John Stevens) disparage me to someone and falsely claim that I “walk around the neighborhood looking for violations” to call into SLOPD dispatch. He said that I am “very persistent” and “will continue to call SLOPD if the call isn’t acted on.” Officer Stevens also said that Residents for Quality Neighborhoods will call in every single noise violation. Further, he said that the people who live in our neighborhood are “especially sensitive to noise” and “know the municipal code inside and out.” 3 1. I do not walk around my neighborhood looking for violations to call in. This statement diminishes the very real problem of our current living situation, surrounded by illegal fraternity houses that regularly have blow- out parties and other disruptive activities. If SLOPD did not repeatedly dismiss noisy party calls as “Negative Violation” and/or “Unable to Locate” I would not be in a position where I had to find the exact address and continually prove that these very real, disruptive parties are happening. Our neighborhood is small – ¼ mile by ¾ mile – and we can hear loud parties, especially with booming bass music, from blocks away. If we are affected, I feel it is within my purview to locate the party and call it into SLOPD. I should not be shamed by SLOPD for doing that! 2. I have never met or interacted with Officer Stevens and my contact with SLOPD has been with dispatchers, some members of SLOPD leadership, and Christine Wallace. Someone at SLOPD told Officer Stevens those things about me. Although I am persistent at times, the other things he said about me are not true. It makes me feel extremely uncomfortable to know that SLOPD leadership is talking about me in such a way. It is also inappropriate for Officer Stevens to say those things to a community member when responding to a call. 3. Our neighborhood is not “especially sensitive to noise”. I have lived in other areas of the city with neighbors who were intolerant of college students and kept track of when others brought their trash bins in, etc. It made me feel uncomfortable. I enjoy the college students in our community and the normal activities of a neighborhood. It is not normal for a lower-density residential neighborhood to have 15% of their houses as fraternities without any conditions, as are required for fraternities operating legally in R-3 and R-4 zones. They are disruptive and loud, and keep the residents awake at night. Residents in any residential neighborhood living under those conditions would be calling the police for help. It does not mean they are “especially sensitive”. It means that the noise and parties are especially disruptive! Monday, 1/15/2024 was MLK, Jr. Day, which is a federal holiday. Our family looked forward to sleeping in that day. Our teenager has been slammed with a challenging workload with honors and AP classes at SLOHS and works 20-30 hours a week at a local restaurant so was especially happy that we had a morning to rest. At 7:45 a.m., we were woken by loud construction noise right outside of our bedroom windows because the investor who owns the property next door hired a contractor to replace and update their sliding door that is about 10’ from our house. There is currently no fence between our properties. I thought that the SLOMC prohibits construction on Sundays and federal holidays, so I got up to look up the ordinance. Then I called SLOPD dispatch about the noise. Officer Stevens responded and told the contractor that construction noise is not allowed on a federal holiday, so they need to stop. He told them “a neighbor who walks the neighborhood looking for violations” called in the noise, and SLOPD doesn’t “go out looking for these” noise violations. He repeatedly apologized and said “the neighbor is persistent and will continue to call SLOPD all day” if they don’t stop the construction. He also said RQN is a group that calls in every single noise violation. He did not cite the contractor for the construction noise. After Officer Stevens left, the contractors continued to use power tools to install a new sliding door for 30-45 minutes. I was confused about why the noise hadn’t stopped and called SLOPD again. The dispatcher told me that the officer said, “it is an emergency repair” and they would be finished in 30 minutes. I told her it was not an emergency repair, and the property owner was just upgrading the sliding door and the construction noise had been going on for a long time so we couldn't sleep. I was dismissed by the dispatcher. The noise continued to keep us awake and I called SLOPD a THIRD time. The dispatcher said she would open the call again. Officer Stevens returned and issued a citation but told the contractor that he could appeal the citation and claim it was an emergency repair. It was not an emergency repair and Officer Stevens knew that, according to the conversation that took place. The contractor said Monday was the only day he was available to do the repair so that’s why he did it that morning. The contractor gestured toward our house and told Officer Stevens that he knew it was us who called SLOPD. I did not realize these conversations took place until I reviewed our video surveillance later that day, which shows the loud construction for nearly two hours and the conversations between the contractor and SLOPD Officer Stevens. 4 I am not sure if I have already shared with you that I was targeted by one of the fraternity guys last academic school year. The day after they were issued a noise citation, he began cyberstalking me by posting ads on Craigslist for people to come to my home for “free scrap metal”, opened an account on PornHub using my name, phone number, and email, made various appointments for people from several religious organizations to come to my home including representatives from Latter Day Saints, Jehovah's Witness, and Church of Scientology, and spammed me with countless emails and phone calls from dozens of organizations and businesses such as car dealerships. I filed a police report and remained fearful that someone would show up at my door for any number of reasons, such as a dating-type situation, and that I would be in danger. Hearing Officer Stevens say these things and realizing that he is likely repeating the same thing to the fraternity guys when he responds to noisy parties, made me fearful that one of them may target me and seek revenge if they see me walking toward a noisy party in the neighborhood. I do not appreciate the message that Officer Stevens, through someone else at SLOPD, is spreading about me, which makes me feel unsafe in my own home. This past weekend was the Winter Rush for Cal Poly’s fraternities and while most of you may feel relaxed and rested by the weekend, our family feels that we’ve been through a war. We are exhausted and feel defeated. The loud parties started on Thursday and continued, day and night, throughout the weekend. An illegal fraternity five doors down at 1237 Fredericks Street had a huge party with over 100 people on Friday night. We could hear country music and people screaming from our house. I walked down and took a video, then called SLOPD at around 10 p.m. Forty-five minutes later, the music was still blaring, and people were still screaming. I went back down to the party and, feeling frustrated that SLOPD did not break it up, I asked the four guys guarding the front door if they realized a family lived nearby and we could hear their loud party. They said that SLOPD had already been there and told them the noise did not cross the property line and they were fine. (The noise definitely crossed the property line, as shown in my video taken at 10 p.m.) I told them it wasn’t fine, and they had five minutes to shut down the party or I would call SLOPD and would wait for them to get there. After some back and forth, they went in and turned down the music and people flooded out of the house and left in every direction, so I went home. Later, a large group of females stopped in front of our home, loudly conversing, and I had to go out to tell them that a family lives here and we were trying to sleep. I could hear noise from parties throughout the neighborhood, and the groups of loud people continued past our house until after 2 a.m. Loud parties and screaming people could be heard throughout our neighborhood for the entire weekend. My daughter, son-in-law, and our young grandchildren are staying with us while their house near Sinsheimer Park is being remodeled and they have been absolutely stunned by the level of noise and craziness in our neighborhood. My daughter commented that it's like Las Vegas. She works from home as the Director for a large commercial contractor, overseeing the design and development of data centers for Meta, and also teaches at Cal Poly (as does our son-in-law) while raising two small children, so the noise has been challenging for them, as well. This weekend she continually commented about the large number of people openly drinking alcohol while SLOPD officers watched them walk by without taking any action. She said SLOPD would cite open containers when she was a student at Cal Poly more than a decade ago. They also both commented about the location of fraternities, and how they were located closer to campus when they were students there. It is remarkable and unbelievable that things have evolved to such an extremely intolerable state in our neighborhood. How did this happen? I met with Community Development Director, Timmi Tway and Code Enforcement Supervisor, John Mezzapesa on 11/8/2023 and gave them an extensive report with documentation for every illegal fraternity house in San Luis Obispo. There are 75 documented fraternity houses in the city, and 57 of those are illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. The remaining 18 (75 – 57 = 18) are in R-3 and R-4 zones, but only seven of those have Use Permits to 5 operate legally. The Use Permits prohibit parties after 10 p.m., even though they are in higher-density zones. Therefore, it is illogical that the fraternities have been allowed to operate as they have in R-1 and R-2 zones. Use Permits for new fraternities were issued as recently as 2013, under the direction of the Community Development Director. I believe Derek Johnson was the Community Development Director in 2013. When the roof collapsed in an R-2 residential zone at 348 Hathway during St. Fratty’s Day 2015, it was reported by Cal Poly that it happened at a fraternity. It was also reported to the city, through Cal Poly’s investigation of the incident, that other fraternities were operating on Hathway that day. It was simple for me to find the locations of the illegal fraternities by looking at their social media posts advertising their rush activities. The SLOPD and Christine Wallace have also told me that they are aware of several fraternity houses in our neighborhood. Why didn’t the city intervene to stop the proliferation of illegal fraternities then, when they knew they were operating illegally, in violation of the SLOMC and Zoning Regulations in 2015? Since then, more and more fraternities have crept further into the R-1 and R-2 residential neighborhoods and have completely overtaken Alta Vista! It’s crazy that the city has allowed this to happen. What is the city doing now, since I've provided indisputable evidence of the addresses of illegal fraternities in R-1 and R-2 zones? SLOPD’s lack of enforcement of the noise ordinance in our neighborhood has added insult to injury. Please do something to encourage SLOPD to enforce the noise ordinance and get the illegal fraternities out of our neighborhood. I am very, very worried about St. Fratty’s Day because many of the illegal fraternities have parties and for the past two years, SLOPD was unable to control the parties or the crowd of thousands of intoxicated college-aged people who overtook our neighborhood. Are you taking action to prevent the large crowds of people from overtaking the streets? Will SLOPD be accessing the loud parties to cite them, or will they remain outside of the street party takeover for hours until it burns itself out, as they did l ast year? Please help me understand what the city is doing to prevent this from happening for a third year in a row. Thank you for your help. We don't know where else to turn. I've attached a portion of the video surveillance from SLOPD Officer Stevens for your reference. I also have videos of some of the loud parties that were not cited this weekend, if you are interested. Please help us end this nightmare so we can enjoy our weekends and get adequate rest. Sincerely, Kathie Walker 1 Subject:Canceled: SCLC Meeting Location:City Hall Hearing Room Start:Thu 3/14/2024 3:00 PM End:Thu 3/14/2024 5:00 PM Show Time As:Free Recurrence:(none) Recurrence Pattern:Occurs every month on the third Thursday of the month from 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM effective 10/19/2023 until 5/16/2025. Meeting Status:Accepted Organizer:Tracy L. Watson Importance:High This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. The March 14, meeting has been canceled 1 Subject:ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Start:Mon 4/8/2024 6:10 PM End:Mon 4/8/2024 7:10 PM Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Meeting organizer Organizer:Stewart, Erica A Required Attendees:Erica Stewart (W); Erica Stewart (W) Call Handling Mode 2:2 From: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 9:55:22 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu> Subject: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Mayor Stewart, On behalf of the Associated Students, Inc. (ASI) at California Polytechnic State University and ASI Student Government, we appreciate your service, leadership, and dedication to the San Luis Obispo community. As a former ASI President yourself, you are aware that the role of ASI Student Government is to represent and advocate at the campus, community, and state-wide level on behalf of over 20,000 Cal Poly students. As student leaders this year, we are committed to upholding that responsibility and enhancing the student experience both on- and off-campus. This year, we have prioritized connecting with our community, through creating and maintaining strong working relationships w ith those who serve it. We hope that our attendance at City Council meetings and coordination with the San Luis Obispo Police Department on safety enhancement zones has demonstrated our desire to maintain open lines of communication between Cal Poly students and the city of San Luis Obispo. Students represent a large portion of the population in the city of San Luis Obispo, and we believe that a collaborative partnership and engaged relationship will enhance our ability to mutually serve our community. In the spirit of engaging in a collaborative partnership between student leaders and the city, the ASI External Affairs commi ttee has re-envisioned the ASI Meet Your Representatives event series. The new format will be geared more toward introducing student leaders to community leaders via student-government-centered events. Meet Your Representatives will be held during ASI Board of Directors Workshops, which are held every Monday during the academic year between 5 – 7 p.m. Board Workshops are open to the public and attended by all members of the ASI Board of Directors. If you are interested and available to attend an upcoming workshop in either winter or spring quarter, we would love to have you! If you have any questions or would like to schedule a date, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your service to the city of San Luis Obispo, your support of ASI student leaders, and your consideration to participate in this event. Respectfully, 2 REAGAN DENNY Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Agricultural Engineering Society Secretary ASI Board of Directors CAFES Representative, External Affairs Chair _____ Cell: 1 Subject:ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Start:Mon 4/8/2024 6:10 PM End:Mon 4/8/2024 7:10 PM Show Time As:Tentative Recurrence:(none) Organizer:Stewart, Erica A Required Attendees:Erica Stewart (W); Erica Stewart (W) Call Handling Mode 2:2 From: Reagan J. Denny <rjdenny@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 9:55:22 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Cc: Michelle Crawford <mcrawf02@calpoly.edu>; Meghan Schuler-Jones <mcschule@calpoly.edu> Subject: Cal Poly ASI Meet Your Representatives Meeting Request This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Mayor Stewart, On behalf of the Associated Students, Inc. (ASI) at California Polytechnic State University and ASI Student Government, we appreciate your service, leadership, and dedication to the San Luis Obispo community. As a former ASI President yourself, you are aware that the role of ASI Student Government is to represent and advocate at the campus, community, and state-wide level on behalf of over 20,000 Cal Poly students. As student leaders this year, we are committed to upholding that responsibility and enhancing the student experience both on- and off-campus. This year, we have prioritized connecting with our community, through creating and maintaining strong working relationships w ith those who serve it. We hope that our attendance at City Council meetings and coordination with the San Luis Obispo Police Department on safety enhancement zones has demonstrated our desire to maintain open lines of communication between Cal Poly students and the city of San Luis Obispo. Students represent a large portion of the population in the city of San Luis Obispo, and we believe that a collaborative partnership and engaged relationship will enhance our ability to mutually serve our community. In the spirit of engaging in a collaborative partnership between student leaders and the city, the ASI External Affairs commi ttee has re-envisioned the ASI Meet Your Representatives event series. The new format will be geared more toward introducing student leaders to community leaders via student-government-centered events. Meet Your Representatives will be held during ASI Board of Directors Workshops, which are held every Monday during the academic year between 5 – 7 p.m. Board Workshops are open to the public and attended by all members of the ASI Board of Directors. If you are interested and available to attend an upcoming workshop in either winter or spring quarter, we would love to have you! If you have any questions or would like to schedule a date, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your service to the city of San Luis Obispo, your support of ASI student leaders, and your consideration to participate in this event. Respectfully, 2 REAGAN DENNY Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Agricultural Engineering Society Secretary ASI Board of Directors CAFES Representative, External Affairs Chair _____ Cell: 1 Subject:SCLC Meeting Location:City Hall Hearing Room Start:Thu 4/18/2024 3:00 PM End:Thu 4/18/2024 5:00 PM Recurrence:(none) Recurrence Pattern:Occurs every month on the third Thursday of the month from 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM effective 10/19/2023 until 5/16/2025. Meeting Status:Accepted Organizer:Tracy L. Watson -----Original Appointment----- From: Tracy L. Watson <twatson@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 4:30 PM To: Tracy L. Watson; Marx, Jan; Michelle Shoresman <mshoresman@co.slo.ca.us>; Shoresman, Michelle; Pease, Andy; asccpres@cuesta.edu (asccpres@cuesta.edu); Amoroso, Brian; brettcross ( ; Debbie Arnold; Johnson, Derek; elizabeth_coria@cuesta.edu; Hermann, Greg; ifc- president@calpoly.edu; Jack DePuy; Joy M. Pedersen; ( ; Madison Malia Clark; Mayson Ashna Kobell; Meghan Schuler-Jones; Meghan Schuler-Jones; Michelle Crawford; ngalante@wilshirehcs.org; Scott, Rick; Samuel S. Andrews; Sarai Gonzalez; Stewart, Erica A; Tyler C. Coari; Wallace, Christine Subject: SCLC Meeting When: Thursday, April 18, 2024 3:00 PM-5:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: City Hall Hearing Room -----Original Appointment----- From: Tracy L. Watson <twatson@calpoly.edu> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 9:57 AM To: Tracy L. Watson; Michelle Shoresman <mshoresman@co.slo.ca.us>; Shoresman, Michelle; Pease, Andy; asccpres@cuesta.edu (asccpres@cuesta.edu); Amoroso, Brian; brettcross ( ; Debbie Arnold; Johnson, Derek; elizabeth_coria@cuesta.edu; Hermann, Greg; ifc-president@calpoly.edu; Jack DePuy; Joy M. Pedersen; ( ; Madison Malia Clark; Mayson Ashna Kobell; Meghan Schuler-Jones; Meghan Schuler-Jones; Michelle Crawford; ngalante@wilshirehcs.org; Scott, Rick; Samuel S. Andrews; Sarai Gonzalez; Stewart, Erica A; Tyler C. Coari; Wallace, Christine Subject: SCLC Meeting When: Thursday, April 18, 2024 3:00 PM-5:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: City Hall Hearing Room -----Original Appointment----- From: Tracy L. Watson <twatson@calpoly.edu> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 2:09 PM To: Tracy L. Watson; Pease, Andy; asccpres@cuesta.edu (asccpres@cuesta.edu); Amoroso, Brian; brettcross ( ; Debbie Arnold; Johnson, Derek; elizabeth_coria@cuesta.edu; Hermann, Greg; ifc- 2 president@calpoly.edu; Jack DePuy; Joy M. Pedersen; ; Madison Malia Clark; Mayson Ashna Kobell; Meghan Schuler-Jones; Meghan Schuler-Jones; Michelle Crawford; ngalante@wilshirehcs.org; Scott, Rick; Samuel S. Andrews; Sarai Gonzalez; Stewart, Erica A; Tyler C. Coari; Wallace, Christine Subject: SCLC Meeting When: Thursday, April 18, 2024 3:00 PM-5:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: City Hall Hearing Room This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. 991 Palm Street, SLO 1 Subject:2024 Whale Rock Commission Meeting Location:Council Hearing Start:Thu 5/2/2024 3:30 PM End:Thu 5/2/2024 5:00 PM Show Time As:Tentative Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Not yet responded Organizer:Utilities Required Attendees:Utilities; Stewart, Erica A; Evans, Noah; Johnson, Derek; Garcia, Tavy; 'Mathis, Dane@DWR'; Chad N. Worth; 'Gaughan, Nathan@CDCR' Optional Attendees:Boerman, Mychal; Floyd, Aaron; Malicoat, Debbie; Aiello, Antonio; Scott, Shawna; Meeks, Jason; McDonald, Whitney; Humphrey, Ed; Tutt, Travis; Jackson, Emily; Erica Stewart (W); Erica A. Stewart; Whittington, Shane; Stuckenberg, Serenity; Kuhn, Riley Resources:Council Hearing -----Original Appointment----- From: Utilities <utilities@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 11:13 AM To: Utilities; Stewart, Erica A; Evans, Noah; Johnson, Derek; Garcia, Tavy; 'Mathis, Dane@DWR'; Chad N. Worth; 'Gaughan, Nathan@CDCR' Cc: Boerman, Mychal; Floyd, Aaron; Malicoat, Debbie; Aiello, Antonio; Scott, Shawna; Meeks, Jason; McDonald, Whitney; Humphrey, Ed; Tutt, Travis; Jackson, Emily; Erica Stewart (W); Erica A. Stewart Subject: 2024 Whale Rock Commission Meeting When: Thursday, May 2, 2024 3:30 PM-5:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: Council Hearing Agenda to follow. Please forward to any of your staff interested in attending.