HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/10/1994, Agenda II III
II
I
IVIII IIII ...........:ny!niiiiiii'}:!Any.?'^.:n
cit o San LUIS OBISPO
:_
STUDY SESSION
COUNCIL AGENDA
Thursday, March 10, 1994 - 11:00 AM
Council Hearing Room, City Hall
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
CALL TO ORDER: Vice Mayor Allen K. Settle** Lead Person -Item to come back to Council
*Denotes action by Lead Person
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No Asterisk- Information Only
ROLL CALL: Council Members Penny Rappa, Bill Roalman, Dave Romero,
and Vice Mayor Allen K. Settle
Mayor Peg Pinard absent.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD"(Not to exceed 15 mmutes'total)
TheCouncil welcomes your input. You may address the Council by completing a speakers;'
shp and giving rt to the City Clerk pnor`to the meeting At time, you may address the
Council on dems Ghat are not-one agenda or items on the'Consent Agenda Time limn
. .....is three.minutes Statelaw does not:allow Councl';to take:action on issues not.on the
agenda Staff may be':asked to'follow-up on such :Mems:
None.
COUNCIL`LIAISON 'REPORTS`(not to exceed 15 minutes)
Council:Members report on conferences or other.City activities. Time limit - 3 minutes
None.
STUDY SESSION
► 1. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN (NEUMANN/715 - 60 min.)
Consideration of the Emergency Operations Plan. (Plan is available in the Council Office for
inspection.)
1
City Council Meeting Thursday, March 10, 1994
♦RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the Emergency Operations Plan as required
by Section 224.080 of the Muncipal Code.
*NEUMANN FINAL AC710N. Resakifio r Na 8275 adopted (3-1-1, AS-no, PP-abs).
► 2. UNREINFORCED MASONRY PROGRAM (JONAS/707 - 60 min.)
Consideration of a report on the progress of the City's unreinforced masonry building mitigation
program.
♦ RECOMMENDATION: By motion, receive report and provide additional direction, if necessary.
*JONAS FINAL ACTION: 1) Bring back the Historical Museum Analysis for further clarification (general
consent);2)Staff to determine methodologies and funding alternatives for URM analysis(general
consent); and 3) Bring back a program (for residential retrofit) with a component similar to the
Santa Barbara program (general consent).
No. 3. CHC HISTORIC PRESERVATION (FOURIE - 30 min.)
Oral presentation by Denise Fourie, Chairperson of the Cultural Heritage Committee, on historic
preservation efforts in the City of Los Gatos, California, in the aftermath of the Loma Prieta
Earthquake.
FINAL ACTION: Staff to work with CHC, and Tom Baasch to package the issue (rebuilding vs.
preservation of buildings after a disaster) as much as possible and bring it to Council at the
earliest date (general consent); and Staff to return with a program for City Hall roof retrofit.
COMMUNICATIONS (not to exceed 15 minutes)
At this time.; any Council' Member or the City Administrative Officer may informally update'
the CityCouncil on communications and ask forcomment and/or discussion Due"to State'; :'
law;formal:action or approval may not be taken Action on'rtems may be scheduled at the
next'Regular meeting
COMMA. Vice Mayor Settle requested Engineering to evaluate signalizing the intersection of.
Los Osos Valley Road and Oceanaire (consensus).
ADJOURNED TO TUESDAY, MARCH 15, 1994 AT 7:00 PM
2
MEMORANDUM
March 4, 1994
To: City Clerk
From: John D n
Subject: Suggested Agenda for March 10 Study Session on Earthquake
Preparedness and Recovery
1. City's Disaster Preparedness Plan - Bob Neumann
2. Status of unreinforced masonry buildings - Tom Baasch
3. Concern about older buildings not being properly tied to foundations - Tom Baasch
4. Cultural Heritage Commission concern with preservation of architectural integrity of
the downtown in the event of an earthquake - Janice Ramsey
5. Concern with protection of City buildings and citizen and City employee safety:
(a) County Historical Museum
(b) City Hall roof, and
(c) Fire Station No. 1.
JD:mc
C. Bob Neumann
Tom Baasch
Arnold Jonas
Mike.McCluskey
John Moss
Wayne Peterson
Bob Hamilton
h/agendal0
MEMORANDUM
March 4, 1994
To: City Council
From: John DunyZ
Subject: Earthquake Preparedness and Recovery
Particularly since the Los Angeles earthquake these are the concerns that I have heard
expressed:
1. Completeness and adequacy of City's disaster preparedness plan.
2. Status of unreinforced masonry buildings and possible financial assistance program.
3. Danger of older buildings slipping off their foundations (as in Ferndale).
4. Cultural Heritage Commission's concern of preserving architectural integrity of the
downtown in the event of a major earthquake (as in Los Gatos).
5. City's compliance with URM program(the County Historical Museum,in particular).
6. Integrity of public facilities and highways and bridges, and recovery methods.
7. Integrity of utility systems and timely restoration of service.
8. Adequacy of record keeping and gaining proper reimbursement to City.
9. "Tying down" of things that fall (t.v. sets, file cabinets, tall furniture, water heaters,
etc.).
10. Possible failure of City Hall roof in the event of an earthquake.
11. Immediate earthquake response needs for building condition notices, inspection
supplies, food, water, electricity, housing resources, etc.
The first five of these issues comprise the majority of our agenda for the March 10 study
session on this subject. However, staff will be prepared to give information and answer
questions in the balance of these areas.
JD:mc
h/quake