Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBatch 1440 From:Boswell, Mike Sent:Friday, June 13, 2025 9:27 AM To:Crystal Bradshaw Subject:Re: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Crystal: Thanks for the update. I'd be interested in meeting with you and Justin to walk the neighborhood and learn more about the issues if you'd like. In the financial plan that we will review next week, council has identified neighborhood livability as a priority. Staff will be reviewing concerns like these as well as looking at our current policies and procedures. They will then bring this to council for additional action. Mike Mike Boswell Council Member Office of the City Council E MBoswell@slocity.org C 805.748.8178 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2025 10:02 AM To: Crystal Bradshaw < Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org>; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy BCC:CC Hello Crystal, Thank you for your comments and the follow-up information you have provided. I am sorry to hear that you are having challenges in your neighborhood. If anyone (fraternity/sorority or not) is violating our regulations and codes, please report them so that we can follow up and address the issue. The Code Enforcement division enforces regulations related to neighborhood wellness (such as overgrown weeds, furniture in front yards, other property blight, etc.) and complaints can be submitted through AskSLO and noise complaints are handled by the police department. There are not plans to have discussions about requiring approvals for homes with more than a certain number of tenants, however, the Community Development Department work program for this upcoming budget cycle does include holding a discussion at the City Council regarding Code Enforcement priorities. This is expected to go before the Council next spring/summer, and would be an appropriate time to raise issues related to neighborhood wellness and compatibility. I am happy to add you to an “interested parties list” so that you will receive an email when this item moves forward. 41 Thank you, Timmi Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 1:22 PM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Thanks Andrea! I forgot to mention that the reason this has become such a notable issue in this particular neighborhood is that most of the homes were built in the early 1990s and are quite large, with a high number of bedrooms. Since SLO follows the Santa Barbara standard of two occupants per bedroom, many of these homes end up housing 6 to 12 residents—plus the frequent comings and goings of guests and friends. When you place that level of activity in a cul-de-sac within an R-1 zone, it quickly becomes overwhelming for the neighborhood. Here are a few examples from Cerro Ct:  167 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 3,037 sq ft  143 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 2,850 sq ft  128 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,303 sq ft  136 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,412 sq ft, plus two exterior rooms (262 sq ft and 263 sq ft) and a permitted second unit And from Cerro Romauldo:  109 Cerro Romauldo – 5 bedrooms, 2,650 sq ft I hope this helps provide some additional context. Best, Crystal Bradshaw On Jun 10, 2025, at 12:51 PM, Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> wrote: BCC: Council All 42 Hi Crystal, Thank you for your email to Council Member Jan Marx and City Staff. I am including Timmi Tway, Director of Community Development and Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development who can provide more information and answers to the thread below. City Council Members and additional key City staff are bcc’d for their awareness on the issues sent to Council Member Marx. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 3:29 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Hello, I’m writing to follow up on my previous email from October regarding high occupancy and ongoing noise issues in R-1 zoning areas—specifically on Cerro Court & Cerro Romauldo in The Foothills planned subdivision. Although the homes in question are not technically fraternity houses, many are occupied by groups of more than eight students. They continue to cause frequent disturbances—loud parties, ongoing noise even outside of parties, parking congestion, and broader issues of neighborhood compatibility. The police were called out again just this past weekend. Neighbors continue to file complaints with both the police department and landlords, but we’ve seen very little change. We’ve asked that beer pong tables be removed from front yards since October—but nothing has been done. I understand there are broader housing challenges in California, and that San Luis Obispo is taking guidance from Santa Barbara city case law. However, this approach is coming at the expense of long-term residents who simply want to enjoy peace and quiet in their own homes and neighborhoods. The density is just not compatible. I’ve been following Planning Commission discussions related to fraternity houses and was wondering if there is any movement toward revisiting these issues more broadly in the city. Is the Planning Commission planning to take up concerns related to high-occupancy rentals in R- 1 zones or requiring CUP’s for houses that have more than 8 residents? Any updates or information you can share would be greatly appreciated. 43 Sincerely, Crystal Bradshaw “Foothills Subdivision Resident” On Oct 9, 2024, at 8:21 PM, Crystal Bradshaw <crystalsierra@gmail.com> wrote: Hello Jan, Thank you so much for your response—I truly appreciate it. I’ve also reached out to Christine and Scott Heats at SLO City Code Enforcement to discuss these concerns further. Unfortunately, it seems that we have limited options when it comes to addressing the "apartmentization" of single-family residential (SFR) homes and the excessive number of vehicles parked in front of properties and on the street. It’s disheartening to see that despite these concerns, compliance with Santa Barbara rules allows for this to happen. Our neighborhoods were not designed for 3-4 bedroom homes to house 6-10 adults, each with their own vehicle. 44 Beyond fire safety concerns, it’s a significant livability issue, as you mentioned, for those of us who value having a peaceful place to call home. We are now facing a high-occupancy situation that goes beyond what one would expect in SFR-zoned areas—the kind of zoning we considered when we initially invested in these properties. While we can make noise complaints or call the police about the parking issues, these measures do not address the root problem. It often leaves us feeling like the situation is being overlooked, and the resulting frustration is disheartening. I would be very interested to learn whether the City Council might consider reassessing this situation. Are there any upcoming discussions or forums where this topic might be addressed? Thank you again for your time and consideration. Best regards, Crystal Bradshaw On Oct 9, 2024, at 4:45 PM, Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> wrote: Thank you for your message, Crystal. I am sorry that you are having to deal with this disturbing issue in your neighborhood. I am including our City Manager and Community Relations specialist with the Police 45 Department, Christine Wallace in this response. She has a lot of experience dealing with this city wide issue. I recommend calling the Police department with a noise complaint when your inconsiderate neighbors are loud late at night. The nonemergency number is (805) 781-7317. If the residents get a ticket, the landlord will as well. This often gets their attention. It is important to keep calling in noise complaints, so as to create a record. When I lived near Cal Poly, I would exchange cell phone numbers with the students and call them when they were too loud, telling them that if the noise did not stop in 20 minutes, I would call the police. You may also want to get in touch with Neighbors North of Foothill, a community organization that has been quite active in the past. John Ashbaugh may have their contact information. NNOF may need to be revived to protect livability in your neighborhood. Best wishes, Jan Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 1:11 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: SFR1 Occupancy https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/400-Prado-Rd-San-Luis- Obispo-CA- 93401/352449595_zpid/?utm_campaign=iosappmessage&utm_medi um=referral&utm_source=txtshare This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Hello Jan, My name is Crystal Bradshaw. I am Justin Bradshaw‘s wife, and John and Trisha Ashbaugh‘s across the street neighbor. I came across an article that said you had once spearheaded some efforts to work on the issue of overcrowding SFR-1 neighborhoods. Unfortunately, we too have been affected by investor landlords who pack their houses to the brim with too many occupants. I know that in 2019 the 5 person maximum was repealed and that there was caselaw out of Santa Barbara that the city is now adopts. I’m wondering if the issue has been completely closed at the city council. If so, I’d be interested in opening up the topic again. Recently two homes were sold on Cerro Court, the street behind mine. That cul-de-sac is now primarily rentals. Out of 7 homes 4 are high occupancy rentals, 2 are owner occupied and one is a part 46 time residence. Cerro Ct. has become a nightmare for our neighborhood with lots of late night noise, far too many students per home, an over abundance of cars associated with each home, creating parking issues, etc. Despite our CC&R’s saying our neighbors should not be creating nuisances,The landlords seem to be very unwilling to do anything about it in consideration of their resident neighbors. We are left without much protection unless we want to spend a lot of money to sue our neighbors. This does not seem productive. I am in real estate, and own rental homes myself. I’ve also ran several vacation rentals. It seems backwards that the city Homestay ordinance only allows for 4 adults in a home, requires floor plans, recycling plans, parking plans, requires owners to available 24/7 and a complaint hotline, all to avoid neighborhood impact when the long- term rental rules are far less restrictive. Frankly, at this point, I’d rather have Homestays as neighbors than what we currently experience. They don’t even know how to get in touch with half of the landlords. The ones I do speak to have not been responsive to the problem. I’d like to find out if there are any solutions being worked on an how I could be part of a collaborative conversation with the city. My Best, Crystal Bradshaw 47 From:City of San Luis Obispo <communications@slocity.org> Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 4:59 PM To:Lehman, Chris Subject:New Public Notice Available View this email in your browser To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Recent public notices posted by the City of San Luis Obispo: City Council Ordinance Second Reading Post Date: 06/11/2025 10:07 AM The City Council will at its regular meeting at City Hall on June 17, 2025 at 5:30 p.m. consider adopting an ordinance changing the Airport Area Specific Plan to allow mixed-use development within commercial and manufacturing zones... Read the full public notice Planning Commission Public Hearing Post Date: 06/11/2025 10:23 AM The Planning Commission will hold two public hearings at its regular meeting at City Hall on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. The first is to review a change related to a development project proposed at 1144 Chorro Street for seven properties; the second is a re-review of an existing conditional use permit for a fraternity, due to recent noise violations... Read the full public notice Administrative Hearing Post Date: 06/12/2025 8:00 AM The Zoning Hearing Officer will hold a public hearing at 919 Palm Street on Monday, June 23, 2025 at 2:30 p.m. or later, to review a change to a use permit for 1234 Broad Street... Read the full public notice Administrative Actions Post Date: 06/12/2025 8:00 AM The City has received applications to make minor changes to properties on Santa Rosa 48 Street, South Street, and Chorro Street. The Community Development Director will either approve or deny these applications no sooner than June 23, 2025... Read the full public notice To help protect y our privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Facebook To help protect y our privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Instagram To help protect y our privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Twitter To help protect y our privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.YouTube To help protect y our privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn To help protect y our privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Website Copyright © 2025 City of San Luis Obispo, All rights reserved. You are receiving this message because you provided your email address via a city service, event, or program. Our mailing address is: City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list. 49 From:Cohen, Rachel Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 4:36 PM To:Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: USE-0333-2025 and USE-0332-2025 Signed PC Resolutions Thank you!!! Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2025 4:02 PM To: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Cc: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0333-2025 and USE-0332-2025 Signed PC Resolutions Hi, Energov files have been updated and notification to the applicants of the resolution, appeal process, and a new CUP process has been provided! Let me know if there is anything else you need from me. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2025 2:22 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> 50 Cc: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0333-2025 and USE-0332-2025 Signed PC Resolutions Hi Mallory – Attached are the two final resolutions for USE-0333-2025 and USE-0332-2025. Please save a copy in each energov case and close them out. Additionally, please reach out to each fraternity and provide them with a copy with information on the appeal process. Could you also reach out to Christopher Nielsen He is a member of the Cal Poly Delta Chi Alumni Board of Trustees and also provide him with information on the appeal process. You could probably include him on the email sent to the Fraternity President / Representative. Thank you, Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 53 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 3:54 PM To:Sigma Nu President Subject:USE-0333-2025, Resolution No. PC-1103-2025, revoking the Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity (Sigma Nu) at 1304 Foothill and 190 Crandall Way Attachments:PC Resolution No PC-1103-2025 (1304 Foothill) USE-0333-2025.pdf; Conditional Use Permit.pdf Hi Charlie, Last night (June 11, 2025), following the Public Hearing on May 28, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC-1103-2025, revoking the Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity (Sigma Nu) at 1304 Foothill and 190 Crandall Way. A copy of the Resolution is attached here. This Resolution (decision) may be appealed to the City Council. To appeal, you must complete and file the Appeal to the City Council form with the City Clerk’s Office within 10 calendar days of this written rendered decision (by end of business day, Monday June 23, because day 10 is on a weekend). The required filing fee ($2,583.46) must accompany the appeal form. You can pay the appeal fee at the Finance Counter, which is temporarily located at 919 Palm Street, in person from Monday-Thursday, 8am-4pm. If you need to pay over the phone, you can let me know and I’ll coordinate phone payment. Information about the appeal procedures is on the City's Website here (refer to the ‘Appeal to the City Council’ section). If you would like to pursue applying for a new Conditional Use Permit, I have attached here the application checklist of items required to apply (note: physical copies of plans are no longer required). You can apply via email by submitting the application materials to planning@slocity.org. Upon submittal of an application, Planning staff will set up an application and send you an invoice for the required application filing fee ($10,932.57). The invoice will be sent with instructions on how to pay online. If you prefer to apply and pay in person, let me know and I can provide details for days and times when our Planning counter is open to the public. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org | P (805) 783-7704 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Community Development Department 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California (805) 781-7170 Completed Planning Application Form: Applications can be obtained from the Community Development Department or by mail, fax, or at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development Applications for development permits must include, at minimum, the information in this checklist in order to be accepted for processing and evaluation for final action. Additional information may be required following initial review by staff. Applications missing information in this checklist will not be accepted for review. Description of the proposed use: Please provide a detailed description of the proposed use including: the type of proposed activities, hours of operation, goods and services offered, number of employees, number of parking spaces dedicated to the business and any other information related to the use. For residential construction, state if the addition is for a bedroom, additional unit or other use, number of off-street parking spaces and any other related information. Title Page. Including the zoning and current uses of the site, total square footage, the area of the site to be covered by structures, density calculations, parking calculations and total area of landscaping excluding setback areas and the total number of new and existing dwelling units listed by number of bedrooms. A site plan. At a minimum include: building footprints, existing and proposed impervious surfaces, existing and proposed drainage patterns, dimensioned property lines and all building setbacks; location, name and width of adjacent rights-of-way; location and width of all waterways; proposed improvements and demolitions; dimensions of all parking spaces and bays; walls, fences and exterior lights; location of recycling and refuse enclosures; landscaping and outdoor use areas, distance to nearest structure on adjacent property, north arrow and scale. Application Checklist Effective: 7-01-2023 Conditional Use Permit Application Fee: Refer to current Comprehensive Fee Schedule Project Plans, at appropriate scale, using U.S. Customary or English Units •12 copies at full size (Min. 11” x 17”) •1 copy at reduced size (8.5” x 11”) Schematic floor plans. Include interior building layouts, existing and proposed rooms or use areas, square footages of bedrooms, entrances and emergency exits, relationship to exterior use areas. Fire hydrants. Indicate the location and distance to the two (2) closest fire hydrants on the site plan. Fire sprinkler information. Show the location of the backflow prevention device on the site plan. Show the proposed location of the fire sprinkler water lateral on the site plan. Show the location of the fire sprinkler riser and the fire department connection on the schematic floor plan. RESOLUTION NO. PC-1103-2025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REVOKING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY AT 1304 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 190 CRANDALL WAY. THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. WHEREAS, on May 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo revised a Use Permit to allow a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard (Resolution No. 5017-90 (1990 Series)); and WHEREAS, on May 8, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo reviewed a previously approved Use Permit allowing a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under U1484; Sigma Nu, applicant (Resolution No. 5055-91 ((1991 Series)); and WHEREAS, on October 14, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo re-reviewed a previously approved and amended Use Permit allowing a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under U1484; Sigma Nu, applicant (Resolution No. 5111-92 ((1992 Series)); and WHEREAS, between September 2024 and May 2025, the City received complaints regarding conduct at 1304 Boulevard, and the Police Department issued four citations relating to noise violations and an unruly gathering at the property; and WHEREAS, Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violation on January 8, 2025, and an Administrative Citation on April 2, 2025, relating to the multiple, verified violations of the existing Use Permit; and WHEREAS, in order to grant a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission must find, among other things, that the establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use (SLOMC 17.110.070(A)(5)); and WHEREAS, revocation of an existing Conditional Use Permit is appropriate if the Planning Commission cannot make one or more findings of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.110 upon review of the permit due to violations thereof (SLOMC 17.102.020); and WHEREAS, Condition No. 4 of Use Permit requires that the Planning Commission review complaints received by the City and consider whether to add, delete, or modify conditions of approval, or revoke the use permit; and Resolution No. PC-1103-2025 Page 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to Condition No. 4 of the Use Permit, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 28, 2025, for the re-review of the Conditional Use Permit and to consider the continuation of the fraternity use at 1304 Foothill Boulevard and 190 Crandall Way, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under USE- 0333-2025; Sigma Nu, applicant; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was provided at the time and in the manner required by, including publication on May 15, 2025, in the New Times newspaper of a legal ad for the public hearing; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo considered all evidence, including, testimony of the applicant, public comment, and recommendations by staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 (two members absent) to revoke the Conditional Use Permit and directed their legal counsel to prepare a Resolution of revocation for the Commission’s adoption at the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Recitals stated above are incorporated herein as Findings of the Planning Commission. In revoking the Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Municipal Code §17.102.020(C)(7), and without prejudice, the Planning Commission additionally finds: 1. The current use is not consistent with Fraternity regulations of Municipal Code Section 17.86.130 because: a. The fraternity has been repeatedly cited for violations of the City’s Noise Ordinance and unruly gatherings. b. The maximum number of persons on site repeatedly exceeded the limit established by the Conditional Use Permit. c. Since May 2024, nine (9) complaints have been made to the Police for noise violations at 1304 Foothill Blvd, resulting in several citations. A citation issued on November 1, 2024, documented 300 people in attendance at the property. d. At least three citations for noise violations have been issued to the property since issuance of the Notice of Violation of the Conditional Use Permit in January 2025. e. The fraternity has failed to apply for special event permits or parking and transportation plans as required by their Conditional Use Permit, despite Resolution No. PC-1103-2025 Page 3 hosting events which exceeded the routine gathering capacity limits of the Permit. f. There has been a series of events detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood. g. There has been an institutional failure within the fraternity to educate its members about the existence and requirements of the Conditional Use Permit. 2. For the reasons stated above, the design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the current use is not compatible with residential uses in the vicinity. The Planning Commission was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code §17.110.070(A)(3) cannot be made. 3. For the reasons stated above, the continued use of the property as a fraternity under the Conditional Use Permit is not appropriate for the subject location, is incompatible with the neighborhood, and will be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity. The Planning Commission was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code § 17.110.070(A)(5) cannot be made. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit may have a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270.). SECTION 3. Action. The Planning Commission hereby REVOKES the Conditional Use Permit U1484, previously issued as to 1304 Foothill Boulevard for use as a fraternity, based on the Findings stated above. Use as a fraternity shall cease immediately upon execution of this Resolution. Any subsequent application to establish a subsequent Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity at the location shall be subject to all requirements of the Municipal Code, including but not limited to Section 17.86.130 and Chapter 17.110. Resolution No. PC-1103-2025 Page 4 SECTION 4. Appeal. This Resolution of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing an appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of date of this decision as stated below and in compliance with San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.126. The appellant must pay the appropriate appeal fee, if applicable. On motion by Commissioner Munoz-Morris, seconded by Commissioner Flores, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Munoz-Morris, Flores, Kahn, Vice Chair Tolle, and Chair Houghton NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Commissioner Jorgensen, Commissioner Cooley The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 11th day of June 2025. ___________________ Rachel Cohen, Secretary Planning Commission 54 From:Cohen, Rachel Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 2:22 PM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:Webb, Donré Subject:USE-0333-2025 and USE-0332-2025 Signed PC Resolutions Attachments:PC Resolution No PC-1103-2025 (1304 Foothill) USE-0333-2025.pdf; PC Resolution No PC-1102-2025 (1236 Monte Vista) USE-0332-2025.pdf Hi Mallory – Attached are the two final resolutions for USE-0333-2025 and USE-0332-2025. Please save a copy in each energov case and close them out. Additionally, please reach out to each fraternity and provide them with a copy with information on the appeal process. Could you also reach out to Christopher Nielsen He is a member of the Cal Poly Delta Chi Alumni Board of Trustees and also provide him with information on the appeal process. You could probably include him on the email sent to the Fraternity President / Representative. Thank you, Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications RESOLUTION NO. PC- 1102-2025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REVOKING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY AT 1236 MONTE VISTA PLACE. THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. WHEREAS, on August 12, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo revised a Use Permit to allow a fraternity (Kappa Sigma) at 1236 Monte Vista Place (Resolution No. 5230-98 (1998 Series)); and WHEREAS, after Kappa Sigma vacated the project site, Delta Chi began residing at the project site in 2012 and continued the use as a fraternity organization under the provisions of Use Permit U106-98; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2021, a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation was issued to the property due to unpermitted work to enclose upper story balconies to convert non-habitable space into sleeping areas. Building permits to convert the spaces back into decks were submitted in October 2022 and December 2023, but the work has not been completed; and WHEREAS, the City received complaints, and, between September 2024 and May 2025, the Police Department issued three citations relating to noise violations at the property (one was successfully appealed) and one citation for an unruly gathering; and WHEREAS, Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violation on March 19, 2025, relating to the multiple, verified violations of the existing Use Permit; and WHEREAS, in order to grant a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission must find, among other things, that the establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use (SLOMC 17.110.070(A)(5)); and WHEREAS, revocation of an existing Conditional Use Permit is appropriate if the Planning Commission cannot make one or more findings of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.110 upon review of the permit due to violations thereof (SLOMC 17.102.020); and WHEREAS, Condition No. 11 of Use Permit U106-98 requires Planning Commission re-review if complaints are received by the City, at which time the Planning Commission could add, delete, or modify conditions of approval, or revoke the use permit; and Resolution No. PC-1102-2025 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 28, 2025, for the re-review of the Conditional Use Permit and to consider the continuation of the fraternity at 1236 Monte Vista, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under USE-0333-2025, Sigma Nu, applicant; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was provided at the time and in the manner required by, including publication on May 15, 2025, in the New Times newspaper of a legal ad for the public hearing; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo considered all evidence, including testimony of the applicant, public comment, and recommendations by staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 (two members absent) to revoke the Conditional Use Permit and directed their legal counsel to prepare a Resolution of revocation for the Commission’s adoption at the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Recitals stated above are incorporated herein as Findings of the Planning Commission. In revoking the Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Municipal Code §17.102.020(C)(7), and without prejudice, the Planning Commission additionally finds: 1. The current use is not consistent with Fraternity regulations of Municipal Code Section 17.86.130 because: a. The fraternity has been repeatedly cited for violations of the City’s Noise Ordinance and unruly gatherings. b. Since May 2024, ten (10) complaints have been made to the Police for noise violations at the property, resulting in several citations. One of these occurred after the property was served with a Notice of Violation of the Conditional Use Permit on March 19, 2025. c. The fraternity was cited by Police on March 15, 2025, for the “St. Fratty’s Day” party hosted on the property, during a safety enhancement zone and despite City staff’s proactive outreach to fraternity organizations ahead of the St. Patrick’s Day Weekend to encourage safe celebrations and deter unruly gatherings. d. The fraternity was most recently cited for a noise violation on May 17, 2025, after the fraternity was provided notice of the Planning Commission hearing on re-review of the Conditional Use Permit. Resolution No. PC-1102-2025 Page 3 e. The maximum number of persons on site repeatedly exceeded the limit established by the Conditional Use Permit. f. The fraternity has failed to apply for special event permits or parking and transportation plans as required by their Conditional Use Permit, despite hosting events which exceeded the routine gathering capacity limits of the Permit. g. There have been a series of events detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood. h. There has been an institutional failure within the fraternity to educate its members about the existence and requirements of the Conditional Use Permit. 2. For the reasons stated above, the design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the current use is not compatible with residential uses in the vicinity. The Planning Commission was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code §17.110.070(A)(3) cannot be made. 3. For the reasons stated above, the continued use of the property as a fraternity under the Conditional Use Permit is not appropriate for the subject location, is incompatible with the neighborhood, and will be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity. The Planning Commission was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code § 17.110.070(A)(5) cannot be made. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit may have a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270.) SECTION 3. Action. The Planning Commission hereby REVOKES the Conditional Use Permit U106-98, previously issued as to 1236 Monte Vista Place for use as a fraternity, based on the Findings stated above. Use as a fraternity shall cease immediately upon execution of this Resolution. Any subsequent application to establish a subsequent Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity at the location shall be subject to all requirements of the Municipal Code, including but not limited to Section 17.86.130 and Chapter 17.110. Resolution No. PC-1102-2025 Page 4 SECTION 4. Appeal. This Resolution of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing an appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of date of this decision as stated below and in compliance with San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.126. The appellant must pay the appropriate appeal fee, if applicable. On motion by Commissioner Munoz-Morris, seconded by Commissioner Flores, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Munoz-Morris, Flores, Kahn, Vice Chair Tolle, and Chair Houghton NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Commissioner Jorgensen, Commissioner Cooley The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 11th day of June 2025. ___________________ Rachel Cohen, Secretary Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. PC-1103-2025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REVOKING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY AT 1304 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 190 CRANDALL WAY. THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. WHEREAS, on May 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo revised a Use Permit to allow a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard (Resolution No. 5017-90 (1990 Series)); and WHEREAS, on May 8, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo reviewed a previously approved Use Permit allowing a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under U1484; Sigma Nu, applicant (Resolution No. 5055-91 ((1991 Series)); and WHEREAS, on October 14, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo re-reviewed a previously approved and amended Use Permit allowing a fraternity at 1304 Foothill Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under U1484; Sigma Nu, applicant (Resolution No. 5111-92 ((1992 Series)); and WHEREAS, between September 2024 and May 2025, the City received complaints regarding conduct at 1304 Boulevard, and the Police Department issued four citations relating to noise violations and an unruly gathering at the property; and WHEREAS, Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violation on January 8, 2025, and an Administrative Citation on April 2, 2025, relating to the multiple, verified violations of the existing Use Permit; and WHEREAS, in order to grant a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission must find, among other things, that the establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use (SLOMC 17.110.070(A)(5)); and WHEREAS, revocation of an existing Conditional Use Permit is appropriate if the Planning Commission cannot make one or more findings of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.110 upon review of the permit due to violations thereof (SLOMC 17.102.020); and WHEREAS, Condition No. 4 of Use Permit requires that the Planning Commission review complaints received by the City and consider whether to add, delete, or modify conditions of approval, or revoke the use permit; and Resolution No. PC-1103-2025 Page 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to Condition No. 4 of the Use Permit, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 28, 2025, for the re-review of the Conditional Use Permit and to consider the continuation of the fraternity use at 1304 Foothill Boulevard and 190 Crandall Way, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under USE- 0333-2025; Sigma Nu, applicant; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was provided at the time and in the manner required by, including publication on May 15, 2025, in the New Times newspaper of a legal ad for the public hearing; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo considered all evidence, including, testimony of the applicant, public comment, and recommendations by staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 (two members absent) to revoke the Conditional Use Permit and directed their legal counsel to prepare a Resolution of revocation for the Commission’s adoption at the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Recitals stated above are incorporated herein as Findings of the Planning Commission. In revoking the Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Municipal Code §17.102.020(C)(7), and without prejudice, the Planning Commission additionally finds: 1. The current use is not consistent with Fraternity regulations of Municipal Code Section 17.86.130 because: a. The fraternity has been repeatedly cited for violations of the City’s Noise Ordinance and unruly gatherings. b. The maximum number of persons on site repeatedly exceeded the limit established by the Conditional Use Permit. c. Since May 2024, nine (9) complaints have been made to the Police for noise violations at 1304 Foothill Blvd, resulting in several citations. A citation issued on November 1, 2024, documented 300 people in attendance at the property. d. At least three citations for noise violations have been issued to the property since issuance of the Notice of Violation of the Conditional Use Permit in January 2025. e. The fraternity has failed to apply for special event permits or parking and transportation plans as required by their Conditional Use Permit, despite Resolution No. PC-1103-2025 Page 3 hosting events which exceeded the routine gathering capacity limits of the Permit. f. There has been a series of events detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood. g. There has been an institutional failure within the fraternity to educate its members about the existence and requirements of the Conditional Use Permit. 2. For the reasons stated above, the design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the current use is not compatible with residential uses in the vicinity. The Planning Commission was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code §17.110.070(A)(3) cannot be made. 3. For the reasons stated above, the continued use of the property as a fraternity under the Conditional Use Permit is not appropriate for the subject location, is incompatible with the neighborhood, and will be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity. The Planning Commission was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code § 17.110.070(A)(5) cannot be made. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit may have a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270.). SECTION 3. Action. The Planning Commission hereby REVOKES the Conditional Use Permit U1484, previously issued as to 1304 Foothill Boulevard for use as a fraternity, based on the Findings stated above. Use as a fraternity shall cease immediately upon execution of this Resolution. Any subsequent application to establish a subsequent Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity at the location shall be subject to all requirements of the Municipal Code, including but not limited to Section 17.86.130 and Chapter 17.110. Resolution No. PC-1103-2025 Page 4 SECTION 4. Appeal. This Resolution of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing an appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of date of this decision as stated below and in compliance with San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.126. The appellant must pay the appropriate appeal fee, if applicable. On motion by Commissioner Munoz-Morris, seconded by Commissioner Flores, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Munoz-Morris, Flores, Kahn, Vice Chair Tolle, and Chair Houghton NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Commissioner Jorgensen, Commissioner Cooley The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 11th day of June 2025. ___________________ Rachel Cohen, Secretary Planning Commission 55 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 12:35 PM To:Yiming Luo Cc:CityClerk Subject:Records Request Response - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Attachments:PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records.pdf Yiming Luo, The City of San Luis Obispo (“City”) received your request pursuant to the California Public Records Act delivered via email on June 14, 2025. Today’s production will complete our processing of the responsive documents and close the request. - https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=210707 Please be advised that every effort has been made to search for all records which may fall within the scope of your records request, and, as such, we believe our search is quite thorough. However, if you have knowledge of a specific document which has not been provided in response to your request, please notify us, and we will be happy to provide the document(s) to you unless, of course, it is exempt from disclosure pursuant to California Government Code §7921.000 et seq. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications To:CityClerk Subject:Re: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Forgot toadd this - isthere any document orspreadsheet orchart that thecity has showing allnoise complaints received, founded or unfounded, and sorted byfraternity/property? Thanks, Yiming From: Yiming Luo Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:41 PM To: CityClerk@slocity.org <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Hi, I'mrequesting police records ofcalls made tothefollowing addresses, aswell asany citations issued from 9/10/2023 to 6/4/2025 forany reason, such asnoise, any appeals, andany determinations made from those appeals. 720 E. Foothill Blvd 1700 Fredericks 281 Albert 388 Chaplin 1861 Slack 1868 Loomis 1555 Slack Thanks, Yiming 1 56 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 11:46 AM To:Sandy Rowley Cc:Mickel, Fred Subject:Noise Reports Attachments:May 2025 NSPY.pdf; May 2025 LL.pdf; Unruly Gath Jan 1 to May 31 2025.pdf Hi Sandy, Reports attached, including one for unruly gathering, Jan 1 to May 31. Thanks, Christine Wallace Police Public Affairs Manager Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E cwallace@slocity.org T 805.781.7186 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 06/12/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:42 Master Citation Table Page: 1 CITATIONS BY LOCATION: Date of Citation Offense Code Street address ------------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------- 00:00:00 05/05/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 548 COUPER; GRID I-05 00:00:00 05/05/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 284 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 00:00:00 05/05/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 1646 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 00:00:00 05/12/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 14 HATHWAY; GRID K-05 00:00:00 05/12/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 1230 MONTE VISTA # 200; GRID K-06 00:00:00 05/12/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 1320 SANTA ROSA; BJERRE AND GARCIA REALT 00:00:00 05/12/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 281 ALBERT; GRID L-06; GRID K-06 00:00:00 05/21/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 66 RAFAEL; GRID I-06 00:00:00 05/21/2025 SLMC9.12.110D 1335 FOOTHILL; PHI KAPPA PSI, GRID K-05 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 06/12/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:41 Law Incident Summary Report, by Clearance Code Page: 1 Time and Date Number Nature Address Loctn Dsp ----------------- --------- --------------- -------------------------- ----- --- Agency: San Luis Obispo Police Clearance Code: Citation 21:57:34 05/01/25 250501097 Noise 2ND Resp 2069 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 23:07:10 05/01/25 250501109 Noise Police 231 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06, S PN2 NR 23:59:28 05/02/25 250503001 Noise Police 281 ALBERT; GRID L-06; GRI PN2 NR 01:59:35 05/03/25 250503013 Noise Police 1230 MONTE VISTA # 200; GR PN2 NR 22:11:56 05/05/25 250505073 Noise Police 14 HATHWAY; GRID K-05, San PN2 NR 22:50:32 05/09/25 250509102 Noise Police 183 DEL NORTE; GRID H-06, PN1 NR 23:50:46 05/09/25 250509108 Noise 2ND Resp 167 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06, S PN1 NR 22:12:13 05/10/25 250510093 Noise Police 226 PATRICIA; GRID H-06, S PN1 NR 23:02:11 05/10/25 250510099 Noise 2ND Resp 226 PATRICIA; GRID H-06, S PN1 NR 21:45:35 05/15/25 250515093 Noise Police 1335 FOOTHILL; PHI KAPPA P PN2 NR 00:08:23 05/16/25 250516004 Noise Police 66 RAFAEL; GRID I-06, San PN1 NR 20:53:45 05/16/25 250516086 Noise Police 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 22:40:04 05/17/25 250517105 Noise Party 1840 HOPE; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 23:06:55 05/17/25 250517107 Noise Party 416 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 03:34:53 05/20/25 250520007 Noise Police 2022 FIXLINI; GRID M-10, S PN7 NR 22:12:43 05/21/25 250521112 Noise Police 658 GRAVES; ZETA BETA TAU, PN3 NR 22:23:19 05/23/25 250523087 Noise Party 1350 STAFFORD; GRID K-07, PN2 NR 23:49:18 05/23/25 250523098 Noise Police 529 DARTMOUTH; GRID I-05, PN1 NR 02:22:38 05/24/25 250524010 Noise Police 528 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-07 PN2 NR 13:49:41 05/24/25 250524037 Noise Police 1646 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 PN2 NR 14:44:39 05/24/25 250524045 Noise Police 12 HATHWAY; GRID K-05; GRI PN2 NR 15:14:01 05/24/25 250524048 Noise Police 377 ALBERT; GRID L-06, San PN2 NR 20:35:31 05/24/25 250524072 Noise Police 544 PRINCETON; GRID H-05, PN1 NR 22:02:41 05/24/25 250524080 Noise Police 1959 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 14:26:20 05/25/25 250525033 Noise Police 1844 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 15:13:13 05/25/25 250525038 Noise Party 331 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-06 PN2 NR 23:16:55 05/28/25 250528091 Noise Police 1238 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06, PN2 NR 00:36:42 05/29/25 250529004 Noise Police 250 GRAND; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 19:26:01 05/29/25 250529099 Noise Police 3350 ROCKVIEW; GRID L-14, PN10 NR 21:06:05 05/30/25 250530091 Noise Police 346 GRAND; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 22:58:15 05/30/25 250530102 Noise Police 388 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 23:00:22 05/30/25 250530103 Noise Police 216 ALBERT; GRID K-06, San PN2 NR 23:23:50 05/30/25 250530105 Noise Police 1351 ROYAL # 7; GRID G-14, PN8 NR 23:28:53 05/30/25 250530106 Noise 2ND Resp 331 KENTUCKY # A; GRID K-0 PN2 NR 02:51:59 05/31/25 250531009 Noise Party 1924 HAYS; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 14:07:24 05/31/25 250531038 Noise Police 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 14:36:07 05/31/25 250531043 Noise Police 1264 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06, PN2 NR 16:22:15 05/31/25 250531053 Noise Police 571 CUESTA; GRID I-05, San PN1 NR 21:56:48 05/31/25 250531081 Noise Police 281 HATHWAY # 1/2; GRID K- PN2 NR 22:44:53 05/31/25 250531087 Noise Police 1271 STAFFORD; GRID K-07, PN2 NR Total Incidents for this Clearance Code: 40 Clearance Code: Disturbance Adv Card 20:56:04 05/01/25 250501093 Noise Party 2069 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 22:41:44 05/01/25 250501105 Noise Party 1185 FOOTHILL # 32; GRID J PN2 NR 23:31:48 05/01/25 250501111 Noise Party 1239 FOOTHILL # 107; GRID PN2 NR 22:32:23 05/02/25 250502105 Noise Party 2040 SWAZEY; GRID L-11, Sa PN7 NR 22:47:11 05/02/25 250502109 Noise Party 285 HERMOSA; GRID H-07, Sa PN1 NR 23:54:24 05/02/25 250502114 Noise Party 1043 SOUTHWOOD # I; GRID M PN7 NR 00:05:35 05/03/25 250503003 Noise Party 248 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 01:22:38 05/03/25 250503012 Noise Party 572 FOOTHILL # 4; GRID I-0 PN1 NR 23:30:24 05/03/25 250503093 Noise Party 278 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H PN1 NR 00:15:23 05/04/25 250504001 Noise Party 2457 SENDERO; GRID K-12, S PN10 NR 06/12/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:41 Law Incident Summary Report, by Clearance Code Page: 2 Time and Date Number Nature Address Loctn Dsp ----------------- --------- --------------- -------------------------- ----- --- 22:35:56 05/08/25 250508096 Noise Party 1311 FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 PN2 NR 22:47:09 05/09/25 250509101 Noise Party 1510 BROAD; GRID K-10; GRI PN6 NR 23:04:35 05/09/25 250509104 Noise Party 167 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06, S PN1 NR 23:14:07 05/09/25 250509107 Noise Party 1439 PHILLIPS; GRID K-07, PN3 NR 00:13:39 05/10/25 250510001 Noise Party 1706 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 PN2 NR 00:34:59 05/10/25 250510002 Noise Party 570 PEACH # 35; GRID J-09, PN5 NR 15:26:24 05/10/25 250510061 Noise Party 529 COUPER; GRID I-05, San PN1 NR 23:28:53 05/10/25 250510100 Noise Party 710 CALIFORNIA; GRID K-07; PN3 NR 00:20:45 05/11/25 250511002 Noise Party 195 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 00:27:00 05/11/25 250511004 Noise Party 293 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06, S PN2 NR 20:44:24 05/15/25 250515089 Noise Party 2099 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 22:05:59 05/16/25 250516092 Noise Party 813 MEINECKE; GRID J-06, S PN1 NR 23:22:46 05/16/25 250516098 Noise Party 1658 MILL # 1; GRID L-07, PN3 NR 22:17:50 05/17/25 250517101 Noise Party 1944 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 22:33:01 05/20/25 250520112 Noise Party 1262 MURRAY # 18; GRID K-0 PN2 NR 22:32:55 05/22/25 250522095 Noise Party 1698 WILSON; GRID L-07, Sa PN3 NR 21:45:08 05/23/25 250523084 Noise Party 177 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H PN1 NR 22:47:44 05/23/25 250523089 Noise Party 1720 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 PN2 NR 23:07:11 05/23/25 250523091 Noise Party 641 SERRANO; GRID I-07, Sa PN1 NR 23:16:42 05/23/25 250523093 Noise Party 258 CHORRO; GRID J-07, San PN1 NR 23:29:37 05/23/25 250523096 Noise Party 2042 HAYS; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 23:09:57 05/24/25 250524090 Noise Party 678 TORO; GRID K-08, San L PN2 NR 16:31:56 05/25/25 250525044 Noise Party 2315 JOHNSON; GRID M-11, S PN7 NR 21:53:23 05/28/25 250528084 Noise Party 1050 FOOTHILL # 6C; GRID; PN2 NR 23:16:33 05/29/25 250529120 Noise Party 313 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06, S PN1 NR 15:19:29 05/30/25 250530055 Noise Party 342 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06, S PN1 NR 22:00:29 05/30/25 250530095 Noise Party 1677 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN2 NR 22:50:24 05/30/25 250530101 Noise Party 331 KENTUCKY # A; GRID K-0 PN2 NR 23:14:40 05/30/25 250530104 Noise Party 121 TWIN RIDGE; GRID H-03, PN1 NR 00:14:11 05/31/25 250531003 Noise Party 305 SANTA LUCIA; GRID H-05 PN1 NR 00:25:55 05/31/25 250531004 Noise Party 626 BROAD # 11; GRID J-08, PN5 NR 21:47:34 05/31/25 250531078 Noise Party 1658 MILL # 2; GRID L-07, PN3 NR 22:38:38 05/31/25 250531086 Noise Party 1731 SANTA ROSA # A; GRID PN6 NR 22:49:39 05/31/25 250531088 Noise Party 364 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR Total Incidents for this Clearance Code: 44 Clearance Code: Negative Violation 20:48:41 05/01/25 250501091 Noise Party 319 RAMONA; GRID I-06; GRI PN1 NR 20:53:51 05/01/25 250501092 Noise Party 636 CUESTA; GRID I-05, San PN1 NR 22:27:08 05/01/25 250501100 Noise Party 276 HERMOSA; GRID H-07, Sa PN1 NR 22:43:01 05/01/25 250501104 Noise Party 1924 HAYS; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 03:59:07 05/02/25 250502006 Noise Party 2040 SWAZEY; GRID L-11, Sa PN7 NR 14:59:13 05/02/25 250502068 Noise Police 189 CARPENTER; GRID K-06, PN2 NR 17:23:32 05/02/25 250502086 Noise Party 2478 VICTORIA; GRID L-12, PN10 NR 22:22:52 05/02/25 250502102 Noise Party 745 MILL; GRID J-09, San L PN5 NR 00:08:44 05/03/25 250503002 Noise Party 286 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 13:59:17 05/03/25 250503043 Noise Party LONGVIEW & SLACK; GRID K-0 PN2 NR 22:13:05 05/03/25 250503081 Noise Party 830 BOYSEN # 9; GRID J-06, PN1 NR 23:13:35 05/03/25 250503091 Noise Party 1127 FOOTHILL # 109; AREA; PN2 NR 23:58:00 05/03/25 250503095 Noise Party 67 CHORRO; GRID J-07, San PN1 NR 02:52:11 05/04/25 250504013 Noise Party 2040 SWAZEY; GRID L-11, Sa PN7 NR 04:23:55 05/06/25 250506011 Noise Party 1750 BISHOP # 107; GRID M- PN7 NR 20:03:35 05/08/25 250508081 Noise Police 415 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-0 PN1 NR 20:36:05 05/08/25 250508082 Noise Police 1254 STAFFORD; GRID K-07, PN2 NR 22:39:09 05/08/25 250508097 Noise Police 299 ALBERT; GRID L-06; GRI PN2 NR 06/12/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:41 Law Incident Summary Report, by Clearance Code Page: 3 Time and Date Number Nature Address Loctn Dsp ----------------- --------- --------------- -------------------------- ----- --- 23:38:14 05/08/25 250508102 Noise Police 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 17:20:25 05/09/25 250509064 Noise Party 206 ALBERT; GRID K-06, San PN2 NR 20:29:14 05/09/25 250509082 Noise 2ND Resp 2410 HELENA; GRID M-11, Sa PN7 NR 21:14:51 05/09/25 250509086 Noise Party 411 HENDERSON; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 21:51:05 05/09/25 250509094 Noise Party 77 HIGHLAND; GRID G-05, Sa PN1 NR 21:52:11 05/09/25 250509095 Noise Police 416 BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06 PN3 NR 22:31:16 05/09/25 250509100 Noise Police 388 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 03:02:48 05/10/25 250510013 Noise Party 2315 JOHNSON; GRID M-11, S PN7 NR 13:48:00 05/10/25 250510048 Noise Party 510 STANFORD; GRID I-05, S PN1 NR 14:08:35 05/10/25 250510051 Noise Police 725 GRAND; GRID L-07, San PN3 NR 14:34:50 05/10/25 250510054 Noise Party 42 VERDE; GRID I-06, San L PN1 NR 14:38:18 05/10/25 250510055 Noise Party 529 COUPER; GRID I-05, San PN1 NR 15:15:59 05/10/25 250510058 Noise Party 246 CHORRO; GRID J-07, San PN1 NR 17:27:15 05/10/25 250510070 Noise Party 532 DANA;AREA; GRID J-09, PN5 NR 18:32:40 05/10/25 250510075 Noise Party 1706 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 PN2 NR 19:56:00 05/10/25 250510086 Noise Party 3860 HIGUERA S # CS6; GRID PN12 NR 02:51:56 05/13/25 250513005 Noise Party 1360 LAUREL # 9; GRID N-12 PN7 NR 21:33:25 05/13/25 250513075 Noise Police 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 17:02:41 05/14/25 250514060 Noise Party 400 BLK DANA; GRID J-10, S PN5 NR 19:13:11 05/14/25 250514068 Noise Party 790 FOOTHILL # 218; GRID J PN1 NR 20:26:44 05/14/25 250514076 Noise Party 136 STENNER; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 22:01:48 05/14/25 250514085 Noise Party 1700 OSOS; GRID K-10, San PN6 NR 22:29:16 05/15/25 250515094 Noise Police 1234 BROAD; LIBERTINE BREW PN6 NR 00:00:28 05/16/25 250516001 Noise Party 572 FOOTHILL # 17; GRID I- PN1 NR 02:24:12 05/16/25 250516016 Noise Party 311 LONGVIEW # C; GRID K-0 PN2 NR 20:23:14 05/16/25 250516084 Noise Police 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 21:21:57 05/16/25 250516087 Noise Party 526 OAKRIDGE; GRID G-05; G PN1 NR 21:36:27 05/16/25 250516089 Noise Party 1861 WILDING; GRID M-09, S PN7 NR 21:42:32 05/16/25 250516091 Noise Party 137 TWIN RIDGE; GRID H-03, PN1 NR 22:21:57 05/16/25 250516095 Noise Police 655 JOHNSON; GRID K-07, Sa PN2 NR 22:51:32 05/16/25 250516096 Noise Police 345 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 22:51:48 05/16/25 250516097 Noise Police 388 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 00:28:30 05/17/25 250517006 Noise Police 1252 FOOTHILL # 1; GRID K- PN2 NR 01:17:29 05/17/25 250517010 Noise Police 359 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID I PN1 NR 13:18:36 05/17/25 250517045 Noise Police 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSI PN2 NR 13:40:48 05/17/25 250517047 Noise Police 250 GRAND; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 13:54:53 05/17/25 250517048 Noise Party 355 SANDERCOCK; GRID J-11, PN6 NR 14:22:02 05/17/25 250517050 Noise Party 304 LA CANADA; GRID I-05, PN1 NR 14:28:31 05/17/25 250517052 Noise Police 658 GRAVES; ZETA BETA TAU, PN3 NR 14:39:28 05/17/25 250517053 Noise Police 1236 MONTE VISTA; DELTA CH PN2 NR 14:41:59 05/17/25 250517055 Noise Police 1292 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06, PN2 NR 15:29:54 05/17/25 250517061 Noise Police 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 16:44:07 05/17/25 250517068 Noise Police 281 ALBERT; GRID L-06; GRI PN2 NR 17:21:57 05/17/25 250517071 Noise Party 588 STANFORD; GRID I-05, S PN1 NR 19:15:59 05/17/25 250517083 Noise Party 315 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H PN1 NR 20:12:21 05/17/25 250517089 Noise Party GARDEN & HIGUERA; GRID K-0 PN5 NR 21:34:47 05/17/25 250517096 Noise Party 700 BLK WOODBRIDGE; GRID L PN10 NR 21:48:32 05/17/25 250517098 Noise Party 324 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID I PN1 NR 22:02:33 05/17/25 250517099 Noise Party 424 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 22:25:15 05/17/25 250517102 Noise Police 299 ALBERT; GRID L-06; GRI PN2 NR 23:04:10 05/17/25 250517106 Noise Party 107 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06, S PN1 NR 23:24:06 05/17/25 250517110 Noise Party 830 RICARDO; EMERGENCY VEH PN11 NR 23:54:18 05/17/25 250517113 Noise Party 777 WOODBRIDGE; PACIFIC BU PN10 NR 01:27:22 05/18/25 250518008 Noise Party CHORRO N & BOYSEN; GRID I- PN1 NR 19:22:54 05/18/25 250518066 Noise Party 1515 ETO; GRID F-15, San L PN8 NR 06/12/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:41 Law Incident Summary Report, by Clearance Code Page: 4 Time and Date Number Nature Address Loctn Dsp ----------------- --------- --------------- -------------------------- ----- --- 20:57:31 05/18/25 250518078 Noise Party FERRINI & FELTON; AREA OF; PN1 NR 21:46:38 05/18/25 250518082 Noise Party 3960 HIGUERA S # 214; GRID PN12 NR 22:21:59 05/18/25 250518085 Noise Party 1458 PREFUMO CANYON; GRID PN8 NR 23:23:44 05/18/25 250518092 Noise Party 333 ELKS; VALLE VISTA MHP, PN9 NR 18:10:59 05/19/25 250519059 Noise Police 940 SANTA ROSA; GRID K-08, PN2 NR 21:03:29 05/19/25 250519072 Noise Police 333 ELKS # 8; GRID I-13, S PN9 NR 21:42:00 05/20/25 250520107 Noise Party 2042 HAYS; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 23:50:17 05/20/25 250520118 Noise Party 85 STENNER # C; GRID K-06, PN2 NR 19:53:22 05/21/25 250521095 Noise Party 321 BUENA VISTA; GRID L-06 PN3 NR 21:20:04 05/21/25 250521106 Noise Police 675 CLARION; LIQUID GRAVIT PN12 NR 21:23:29 05/21/25 250521107 Noise Party 1700 OSOS; GRID K-10, San PN6 NR 22:54:12 05/22/25 250522097 Noise Police 241 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 00:31:34 05/23/25 250523003 Noise Party 905 MADONNA # 72; SAN LUIS PN13 NR 01:39:24 05/23/25 250523008 Noise Party 1050 FOOTHILL # 1R; GRID J PN2 NR 02:14:21 05/23/25 250523010 Noise Police 1116 PEACH; GRID K-08, San PN2 NR 02:36:27 05/23/25 250523011 Noise Party 1 MUSTANG; MUSTANG VILLAGE PN2 NR 22:29:27 05/23/25 250523088 Noise Police 299 ALBERT; GRID L-06, San PN2 NR 15:59:12 05/24/25 250524053 Noise Police 2 TASSAJARA S; GRID I-06, PN1 NR 16:27:54 05/24/25 250524055 Noise Police 175 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 16:39:09 05/24/25 250524056 Noise Police 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSI PN2 NR 22:21:27 05/24/25 250524082 Noise Police 344 HENDERSON; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 22:42:55 05/24/25 250524088 Noise Police 801 GRAND; VETS HALL; GRID PN3 NR 00:41:11 05/25/25 250525002 Noise Party 973 GOLDENROD; GRID N-17, PN11 NR 01:29:19 05/25/25 250525003 Noise Party 1625 CALLE JOAQUIN; MOTEL PN13 NR 02:02:48 05/25/25 250525008 Noise Party 234 FERRINI; GRID I-06, Sa PN1 NR 02:05:06 05/25/25 250525010 Noise Party 1625 CALLE JOAQUIN; MOTEL PN13 NR 02:05:29 05/25/25 250525009 Noise Party 2315 JOHNSON; GRID M-11, S PN7 NR 09:49:44 05/25/25 250525021 Noise Party 398 SAN MIGUEL; GRID M-06, PN3 NR 12:59:06 05/25/25 250525030 Noise Police 1820 HOPE; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 14:27:52 05/25/25 250525034 Noise Police 250 GRAND; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 19:30:53 05/25/25 250525053 Noise Party 575 STANFORD; GRID I-05, S PN1 NR 22:56:25 05/25/25 250525066 Noise Party HILLCREST & PARK; GRID L-0 PN3 NR 23:06:46 05/25/25 250525067 Noise Party 607 GRAND; KRIS KAR APARTM PN3 NR 20:14:28 05/27/25 250527069 Noise Police 571 CUESTA; GRID I-05, San PN1 NR 19:16:56 05/28/25 250528073 Noise Police 2069 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06, PN3 NR 22:46:51 05/28/25 250528089 Noise Police 299 ALBERT; GRID L-06, San PN2 NR 21:30:18 05/29/25 250529112 Noise Party 2324 MADRID; GRID K-12, Sa PN10 NR 16:20:09 05/30/25 250530064 Noise Police 175 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 20:16:03 05/30/25 250530087 Noise Party 106 SANTA ROSA; GRID J-07, PN2 NR 23:33:12 05/30/25 250530107 Noise Police 1335 FOOTHILL; PHI KAPPA P PN2 NR 23:50:11 05/30/25 250530110 Noise Police 136 CERRO; GRID H-06, San PN1 NR 00:07:35 05/31/25 250531001 Noise Party 284 LA CANADA; GRID I-06, PN1 NR 13:04:09 05/31/25 250531033 Noise Police 571 CUESTA; GRID I-05, San PN1 NR 13:53:55 05/31/25 250531036 Noise Party 151 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06, S PN1 NR 14:11:58 05/31/25 250531039 Noise Party 1340 SAWLEAF; GRID O-16, S PN7 NR 14:28:02 05/31/25 250531042 Noise Police 1841 SLACK; GRID L-06, San PN3 NR 14:33:48 05/31/25 250531041 Noise Party 1542 NEWPORT; GRID G-13, S PN8 NR 16:39:16 05/31/25 250531055 Noise Party 600 BLK COUPER; GRID I-04; PN1 NR 17:08:42 05/31/25 250531057 Noise Police 3350 ROCKVIEW; GRID L-14, PN10 NR 20:39:54 05/31/25 250531071 Noise Police 1688 MILL; GRID L-07, San PN3 NR 21:57:05 05/31/25 250531082 Noise Police 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR 23:00:59 05/31/25 250531089 Noise Police 322 HATHWAY; GRID K-06, Sa PN2 NR Total Incidents for this Clearance Code: 125 Clearance Code: Unable to Locate 06/12/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:41 Law Incident Summary Report, by Clearance Code Page: 5 Time and Date Number Nature Address Loctn Dsp ----------------- --------- --------------- -------------------------- ----- --- 22:09:45 05/02/25 250502101 Noise Party SOUTHWOOD & FLORA; GRID N- PN7 NR 22:31:08 05/02/25 250502104 Noise Party SANTA YNEZ & BUENA VISTA; PN3 NR 22:38:25 05/02/25 250502107 Noise Party PEACH & MORRO; GRID J-08, PN5 NR 22:57:57 05/02/25 250502111 Noise Party LIZZIE & FIXLINI; GRID L-0 PN7 NR 21:50:21 05/09/25 250509093 Noise Party DEL MAR & RAMONA; GRID H-0 PN1 NR 22:16:39 05/09/25 250509097 Noise Party CORTEZ & PREFUMO CANYON; G PN8 NR 20:11:57 05/15/25 250515084 Noise Police NIPOMO & CHURCH; GRID K-11 PN6 NR 01:18:03 05/18/25 250518007 Noise Party 300 BLK CUESTA; GRID I-05, PN1 NR 22:50:34 05/23/25 250523090 Noise Party PATRICIA & CERRO ROMAULDO; PN1 NR 00:56:56 05/26/25 250526002 Noise Party PHILLIPS & GROVE; GRID L-0 PN3 NR 01:16:57 05/26/25 250526003 Noise Party GRAND & WILSON; GRID L-07, PN3 NR Total Incidents for this Clearance Code: 11 Total Incidents for This Agency: 220 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Incidents for This Report: 220 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Report Includes: All dates between `00:00:00 05/01/25` and `23:59:59 05/31/25` All agencies All officers All dispositions All natures All locations All cities All clearance codes All observed offenses All reported offenses All offense codes matching `NSPY` All circumstance codes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** End of Report /tmp/rptL8HIh2-rplwisr.ra_1 *** 06/12/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:44 Master Citation Table Page: 1 CITATIONS BY LOCATION: Date of Citation Offense Code Street address ------------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------- 21:46:00 01/09/2025 SLMC9.13.030A 1621 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 23:11:00 02/07/2025 SLMC9.13.030A 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID 15:22:00 02/08/2025 SLMC9.13.030A 322 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 21:49:00 02/22/2025 SLMC9.13.030A 1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; GRID K-06 00:00:00 03/03/2025 SLMC9.13.030 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID 04:21:00 03/15/2025 SLMC9.13.030A 1236 MONTE VISTA; DELTA CHI, GRID K-06; 21:00:00 05/24/2025 SLMC9.13.030A 544 PRINCETON; GRID H-05 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 57 From:Crystal Bradshaw < Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 10:49 AM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Corey, Tyler; Sheats, Steven; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea; Mezzapesa, John Subject:Re: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Hello Timothea, Thank you for your response. I do want to point out, however, that this is the same guidance I received back in October. We've been following this path since then, but unfortunately, there has been no change. That’s why I’m raising the issue again. The situation really does need to be addressed, as it remains incompatible, and the current avenues available to homeowners for filing complaints are not sufficient to resolve the problem. My Best, Crystal Bradshaw On Jun 12, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> wrote: BCC:CC Hello Crystal, Thank you for your comments and the follow-up information you have provided. I am sorry to hear that you are having challenges in your neighborhood. If anyone (fraternity/sorority or not) is violating our regulations and codes, please report them so that we can follow up and address the issue. The Code Enforcement division enforces regulations related to neighborhood wellness (such as overgrown weeds, furniture in front yards, other property blight, etc.) and complaints can be submitted through AskSLO and noise complaints are handled by the police department. There are not plans to have discussions about requiring approvals for homes with more than a certain number of tenants, however, the Community Development Department work program for this upcoming budget cycle does include holding a discussion at the City Council regarding Code Enforcement priorities. This is expected to go before the Council next spring/summer, and would be an appropriate time to raise issues related to neighborhood wellness and compatibility. I am happy to add you to an “interested parties list” so that you will receive an email when this item moves forward. Thank you, Timmi Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development <image001.png> 58 Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> <image007.png> <image008.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 1:22 PM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Thanks Andrea! I forgot to mention that the reason this has become such a notable issue in this particular neighborhood is that most of the homes were built in the early 1990s and are quite large, with a high number of bedrooms. Since SLO follows the Santa Barbara standard of two occupants per bedroom, many of these homes end up housing 6 to 12 residents—plus the frequent comings and goings of guests and friends. When you place that level of activity in a cul-de-sac within an R-1 zone, it quickly becomes overwhelming for the neighborhood. Here are a few examples from Cerro Ct: 1. 167 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 3,037 sq ft 2. 143 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 2,850 sq ft 3. 128 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,303 sq ft 4. 136 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,412 sq ft, plus two exterior rooms (262 sq ft and 263 sq ft) and a permitted second unit And from Cerro Romauldo: 1. 109 Cerro Romauldo – 5 bedrooms, 2,650 sq ft I hope this helps provide some additional context. 59 Best, Crystal Bradshaw On Jun 10, 2025, at 12:51 PM, Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> wrote: BCC: Council All Hi Crystal, Thank you for your email to Council Member Jan Marx and City Staff. I am including Timmi Tway, Director of Community Development and Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development who can provide more information and answers to the thread below. City Council Members and additional key City staff are bcc’d for their awareness on the issues sent to Council Member Marx. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II <image001.png> City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> <image007.png> <image008.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 3:29 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Hello, 60 I’m writing to follow up on my previous email from October regarding high occupancy and ongoing noise issues in R-1 zoning areas—specifically on Cerro Court & Cerro Romauldo in The Foothills planned subdivision. Although the homes in question are not technically fraternity houses, many are occupied by groups of more than eight students. They continue to cause frequent disturbances—loud parties, ongoing noise even outside of parties, parking congestion, and broader issues of neighborhood compatibility. The police were called out again just this past weekend. Neighbors continue to file complaints with both the police department and landlords, but we’ve seen very little change. We’ve asked that beer pong tables be removed from front yards since October—but nothing has been done. I understand there are broader housing challenges in California, and that San Luis Obispo is taking guidance from Santa Barbara city case law. However, this approach is coming at the expense of long-term residents who simply want to enjoy peace and quiet in their own homes and neighborhoods. The density is just not compatible. I’ve been following Planning Commission discussions related to fraternity houses and was wondering if there is any movement toward revisiting these issues more broadly in the city. Is the Planning Commission planning to take up concerns related to high-occupancy rentals in R-1 zones or requiring CUP’s for houses that have more than 8 residents? Any updates or information you can share would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Crystal Bradshaw “Foothills Subdivision Resident” <image009.jpg> On Oct 9, 2024, at 8:21 PM, Crystal Bradshaw <crystalsierra@gmail.com> wrote: Hello Jan, 61 Thank you so much for your response—I truly appreciate it. I’ve also reached out to Christine and Scott Heats at SLO City Code Enforcement to discuss these concerns further. Unfortunately, it seems that we have limited options when it comes to addressing the "apartmentization" of single-family residential (SFR) homes and the excessive number of vehicles parked in front of properties and on the street. It’s disheartening to see that despite these concerns, compliance with Santa Barbara rules allows for this to happen. Our neighborhoods were not designed for 3-4 bedroom homes to house 6-10 adults, each with their own vehicle. Beyond fire safety concerns, it’s a significant livability issue, as you mentioned, for those of us who value having a peaceful place to call home. We are now facing a high-occupancy situation that goes beyond what one would expect in SFR-zoned areas—the kind of zoning we considered when we initially invested in these properties. While we can make noise complaints or call the police about the parking issues, these measures do not address the root problem. It often leaves us feeling like the situation is being overlooked, and the resulting frustration is disheartening. I would be very interested to learn whether the City Council might consider reassessing this situation. Are there any upcoming discussions or forums where this topic might be addressed? Thank you again for your time and consideration. Best regards, Crystal Bradshaw <image010.jpg> On Oct 9, 2024, at 4:45 PM, Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> wrote: Thank you for your message, Crystal. I am sorry that you are having to deal with this disturbing issue in your neighborhood. I am including our City Manager and Community Relations specialist with the Police Department, Christine Wallace in this response. She has a lot of experience dealing with this city wide issue. I recommend calling the Police department with 62 a noise complaint when your inconsiderate neighbors are loud late at night. The nonemergency number is (805) 781-7317. If the residents get a ticket, the landlord will as well. This often gets their attention. It is important to keep calling in noise complaints, so as to create a record. When I lived near Cal Poly, I would exchange cell phone numbers with the students and call them when they were too loud, telling them that if the noise did not stop in 20 minutes, I would call the police. You may also want to get in touch with Neighbors North of Foothill, a community organization that has been quite active in the past. John Ashbaugh may have their contact information. NNOF may need to be revived to protect livability in your neighborhood. Best wishes, Jan Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 1:11 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: SFR1 Occupancy https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/400-Prado-Rd- San-Luis-Obispo-CA- 93401/352449595_zpid/?utm_campaign=iosappmessa ge&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=txtshare This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Hello Jan, My name is Crystal Bradshaw. I am Justin Bradshaw‘s wife, and John and Trisha Ashbaugh‘s across the street neighbor. I came across an article that said you had once spearheaded some efforts to work on the issue of overcrowding SFR-1 neighborhoods. Unfortunately, we too have been affected by investor landlords who pack their houses to the brim with too many occupants. I know that in 2019 the 5 person maximum was repealed and that there was caselaw out of Santa Barbara that the city is now adopts. I’m wondering if the issue has been completely closed at the city council. If so, I’d be 63 interested in opening up the topic again. Recently two homes were sold on Cerro Court, the street behind mine. That cul-de-sac is now primarily rentals. Out of 7 homes 4 are high occupancy rentals, 2 are owner occupied and one is a part time residence. Cerro Ct. has become a nightmare for our neighborhood with lots of late night noise, far too many students per home, an over abundance of cars associated with each home, creating parking issues, etc. Despite our CC&R’s saying our neighbors should not be creating nuisances,The landlords seem to be very unwilling to do anything about it in consideration of their resident neighbors. We are left without much protection unless we want to spend a lot of money to sue our neighbors. This does not seem productive. I am in real estate, and own rental homes myself. I’ve also ran several vacation rentals. It seems backwards that the city Homestay ordinance only allows for 4 adults in a home, requires floor plans, recycling plans, parking plans, requires owners to available 24/7 and a complaint hotline, all to avoid neighborhood impact when the long-term rental rules are far less restrictive. Frankly, at this point, I’d rather have Homestays as neighbors than what we currently experience. They don’t even know how to get in touch with half of the landlords. The ones I do speak to have not been responsive to the problem. I’d like to find out if there are any solutions being worked on an how I could be part of a collaborative conversation with the city. My Best, Crystal Bradshaw 64 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Thursday, June 12, 2025 10:03 AM To:Crystal Bradshaw Cc:Corey, Tyler; Sheats, Steven; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea; Mezzapesa, John Subject:RE: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy BCC:CC Hello Crystal, Thank you for your comments and the follow-up information you have provided. I am sorry to hear that you are having challenges in your neighborhood. If anyone (fraternity/sorority or not) is violating our regulations and codes, please report them so that we can follow up and address the issue. The Code Enforcement division enforces regulations related to neighborhood wellness (such as overgrown weeds, furniture in front yards, other property blight, etc.) and complaints can be submitted through AskSLO and noise complaints are handled by the police department. There are not plans to have discussions about requiring approvals for homes with more than a certain number of tenants, however, the Community Development Department work program for this upcoming budget cycle does include holding a discussion at the City Council regarding Code Enforcement priorities. This is expected to go before the Council next spring/summer, and would be an appropriate time to raise issues related to neighborhood wellness and compatibility. I am happy to add you to an “interested parties list” so that you will receive an email when this item moves forward. Thank you, Timmi Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 1:22 PM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Thanks Andrea! 65 I forgot to mention that the reason this has become such a notable issue in this particular neighborhood is that most of the homes were built in the early 1990s and are quite large, with a high number of bedrooms. Since SLO follows the Santa Barbara standard of two occupants per bedroom, many of these homes end up housing 6 to 12 residents—plus the frequent comings and goings of guests and friends. When you place that level of activity in a cul-de-sac within an R-1 zone, it quickly becomes overwhelming for the neighborhood. Here are a few examples from Cerro Ct:  167 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 3,037 sq ft  143 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 2,850 sq ft  128 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,303 sq ft  136 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,412 sq ft, plus two exterior rooms (262 sq ft and 263 sq ft) and a permitted second unit And from Cerro Romauldo:  109 Cerro Romauldo – 5 bedrooms, 2,650 sq ft I hope this helps provide some additional context. Best, Crystal Bradshaw On Jun 10, 2025, at 12:51 PM, Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> wrote: BCC: Council All Hi Crystal, Thank you for your email to Council Member Jan Marx and City Staff. I am including Timmi Tway, Director of Community Development and Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development who can provide more information and answers to the thread below. City Council Members and additional key City staff are bcc’d for their awareness on the issues sent to Council Member Marx. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 66 From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 3:29 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Hello, I’m writing to follow up on my previous email from October regarding high occupancy and ongoing noise issues in R-1 zoning areas—specifically on Cerro Court & Cerro Romauldo in The Foothills planned subdivision. Although the homes in question are not technically fraternity houses, many are occupied by groups of more than eight students. They continue to cause frequent disturbances—loud parties, ongoing noise even outside of parties, parking congestion, and broader issues of neighborhood compatibility. The police were called out again just this past weekend. Neighbors continue to file complaints with both the police department and landlords, but we’ve seen very little change. We’ve asked that beer pong tables be removed from front yards since October—but nothing has been done. I understand there are broader housing challenges in California, and that San Luis Obispo is taking guidance from Santa Barbara city case law. However, this approach is coming at the expense of long-term residents who simply want to enjoy peace and quiet in their own homes and neighborhoods. The density is just not compatible. I’ve been following Planning Commission discussions related to fraternity houses and was wondering if there is any movement toward revisiting these issues more broadly in the city. Is the Planning Commission planning to take up concerns related to high-occupancy rentals in R- 1 zones or requiring CUP’s for houses that have more than 8 residents? Any updates or information you can share would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Crystal Bradshaw “Foothills Subdivision Resident” 67 On Oct 9, 2024, at 8:21 PM, Crystal Bradshaw < wrote: Hello Jan, Thank you so much for your response—I truly appreciate it. I’ve also reached out to Christine and Scott Heats at SLO City Code Enforcement to discuss these concerns further. Unfortunately, it seems that we have limited options when it comes to addressing the "apartmentization" of single-family residential (SFR) homes and the excessive number of vehicles parked in front of properties and on the street. It’s disheartening to see that despite these concerns, compliance with Santa Barbara rules allows for this to happen. Our neighborhoods were not designed for 3-4 bedroom homes to house 6-10 adults, each with their own vehicle. Beyond fire safety concerns, it’s a significant livability issue, as you mentioned, for those of us who value having a peaceful place to call home. 68 We are now facing a high-occupancy situation that goes beyond what one would expect in SFR-zoned areas—the kind of zoning we considered when we initially invested in these properties. While we can make noise complaints or call the police about the parking issues, these measures do not address the root problem. It often leaves us feeling like the situation is being overlooked, and the resulting frustration is disheartening. I would be very interested to learn whether the City Council might consider reassessing this situation. Are there any upcoming discussions or forums where this topic might be addressed? Thank you again for your time and consideration. Best regards, Crystal Bradshaw On Oct 9, 2024, at 4:45 PM, Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> wrote: 69 Thank you for your message, Crystal. I am sorry that you are having to deal with this disturbing issue in your neighborhood. I am including our City Manager and Community Relations specialist with the Police Department, Christine Wallace in this response. She has a lot of experience dealing with this city wide issue. I recommend calling the Police department with a noise complaint when your inconsiderate neighbors are loud late at night. The nonemergency number is (805) 781-7317. If the residents get a ticket, the landlord will as well. This often gets their attention. It is important to keep calling in noise complaints, so as to create a record. When I lived near Cal Poly, I would exchange cell phone numbers with the students and call them when they were too loud, telling them that if the noise did not stop in 20 minutes, I would call the police. You may also want to get in touch with Neighbors North of Foothill, a community organization that has been quite active in the past. John Ashbaugh may have their contact information. NNOF may need to be revived to protect livability in your neighborhood. Best wishes, Jan Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 1:11 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: SFR1 Occupancy https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/400-Prado-Rd-San-Luis- Obispo-CA- 93401/352449595_zpid/?utm_campaign=iosappmessage&utm_medi um=referral&utm_source=txtshare This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Hello Jan, My name is Crystal Bradshaw. I am Justin Bradshaw‘s wife, and John and Trisha Ashbaugh‘s across the street neighbor. I came across an article that said you had once spearheaded some efforts to work on the issue of overcrowding SFR-1 neighborhoods. Unfortunately, we too have been affected by investor landlords who pack their houses to the brim with too many occupants. I know that in 2019 the 5 person maximum was repealed and that there was caselaw out of Santa Barbara that the city is now adopts. I’m wondering if the issue has been completely closed at the city council. If so, I’d be interested in opening up the topic again. 70 Recently two homes were sold on Cerro Court, the street behind mine. That cul-de-sac is now primarily rentals. Out of 7 homes 4 are high occupancy rentals, 2 are owner occupied and one is a part time residence. Cerro Ct. has become a nightmare for our neighborhood with lots of late night noise, far too many students per home, an over abundance of cars associated with each home, creating parking issues, etc. Despite our CC&R’s saying our neighbors should not be creating nuisances,The landlords seem to be very unwilling to do anything about it in consideration of their resident neighbors. We are left without much protection unless we want to spend a lot of money to sue our neighbors. This does not seem productive. I am in real estate, and own rental homes myself. I’ve also ran several vacation rentals. It seems backwards that the city Homestay ordinance only allows for 4 adults in a home, requires floor plans, recycling plans, parking plans, requires owners to available 24/7 and a complaint hotline, all to avoid neighborhood impact when the long- term rental rules are far less restrictive. Frankly, at this point, I’d rather have Homestays as neighbors than what we currently experience. They don’t even know how to get in touch with half of the landlords. The ones I do speak to have not been responsive to the problem. I’d like to find out if there are any solutions being worked on an how I could be part of a collaborative conversation with the city. My Best, Crystal Bradshaw 71 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2025 5:49 PM To:Collins, Scott; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Dietrick, Christine Subject:FW: Follow up Hi team, Just looping you into this email I received from Courtney last week regarding Delta Chi and the consequences of revoked CUPs, for your awareness. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12:35 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Cc: Jennifer L. Haft <jhaft@calpoly.edu> Subject: Follow up Hi Whitney, Thank you for the multiple meetings and thoughtful conversation with Cal Poly leadership in the last few weeks. I wanted to follow up on a few questions/items you brought up:  What, if any, consequences will there be for fraternities if their conditional use permits are revoked at the planning commission hearing? Update: as you know, PC did revoke both fraternities CUPs. o An assessment of potential policy violations occurs when the San Luis Obispo Police Department refers certain cases to Cal Poly’s Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities (OSRR). This process provides the university with the opportunity to hold individuals or organizations accountable for certain off-campus behaviors that may violate campus policies. It is at this point in the process that accountability takes place. 72 o No further university actions are planned in relation to the City’s or Planning Commission’s evaluation of municipal decisions based on the aggregation of such violations. o Separate from any Planning Commission or City Council decisions related to CUPs, Cal Poly is formally building out policies to hold accountable individuals and organizations with increasing consequences for compounding violations. This process is being piloted now with official roll-out this fall.  Your request for Cal Poly’s reconsideration of the OSRR decision to hold Delta Chi Not Responsible for the gathering that took place on March 15th. o Since we met and discussed this topic, OSRR conducted a thorough re-evaluation of the circumstances and decision. This included a careful review of available documentation, relevant communications, and university policy. While we understand and respect the City’s perspective, no new evidence emerged that would alter the outcome. If SLO PD has new or additional evidence for the case, we would ask that it be shared with us for evaluation. The original determination—that there was no code of conduct violation by Delta Chi for a violation of campus policy related to this incident—remains unchanged. o We also want to clarify one element of the original decision letter: while the decision referenced a “flyer,” that was a misstatement. The material in question was, in fact, the banner that was hung in the courtyard. I know I mentioned it when we spoke so wanted to correct that. We value our partnership with the City of San Luis Obispo and remain committed to working together in support of a safe and respectful community. OSRR and Student Affairs leadership will be meeting over the summer, with the goal of connecting with your teams in the process as well, to further brainstorm about how to come to reasonable solutions related to some of the challenges we’re facing with certain student behaviors that are in conflict with other, longer-term neighbors. Please let me know if I can provide any additional information or clarifications. Thanks, Courtney. Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 73 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2025 1:03 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Symens, Sadie Subject:06/11/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 3b BCC: PC Members and Staff Hello, Linked below is the agenda correspondence for the June 11, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. Item 3b – ADOPT RESOLUTION OF REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY USE AT 1236 MONTE VISTA PLACE - Zuckermandel Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 74 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2025 12:50 PM To:Jakob Zuckermandel Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: PC Communication Hi Jakob, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for tonight’s meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 12:32 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: PC Communication Dear Commissioners, My name is Jakob , and I served as the President of the Delta Chi Fraternity at Cal Poly for this past year. I apologize for not being with you in person, as this is finals week and I will be in a final during the time of the commission meeting. I want to express my strong opposition to the proposed revocation resolution of our Conditional Use Permit, and to thank you for the thoughtful attention you’ve given to this process. I especially appreciate the care with which you raised concerns last week about health, safety, and neighborhood welfare — concerns that we share and are actively working to address. Delta Chi is more than just a student residence — it is a space where young men are growing, learning, and becoming accountable leaders. Academic excellence is at the core of our fraternity’s values. We consistently rank among the top fraternities on campus for GPA, and that’s no accident. We prioritize study groups, peer mentorship, and a culture of mutual academic support. These are not just internal benefits — they reflect the 75 kind of contribution we want to make to our community. We also understand that with privilege comes responsibility. That’s why we’ve taken steps to strengthen continuity and accountability within our organization. We've brought our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation into the process to ensure long-term support and oversight. We’ve elected next year’s leadership and have already begun a values-based transition. Our goal is not to be temporarily compliant, but to be sustainably constructive partners in this community. Revoking our CUP would move us — and likely other chapters — outside of a framework where expectations, oversight, and accountability are possible. Instead, we ask that the Commission view this as an opportunity: to lead a conversation on modernizing and improving the CUP framework so it can better serve both neighborhood needs and the positive potential of student organizations. We are ready and willing to work with you, and we respectfully ask for the chance to continue growing in partnership with the city. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jakob Zuckermandel Immediate Past President, Delta Chi Fraternity 76 From:Jakob Zuckermandel < Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2025 12:32 PM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:PC Communication Dear Commissioners, My name is Jakob , and I served as the President of the Delta Chi Fraternity at Cal Poly for this past year. I apologize for not being with you in person, as this is finals week and I will be in a final during the time of the commission meeting. I want to express my strong opposition to the proposed revocation resolution of our Conditional Use Permit, and to thank you for the thoughtful attention you’ve given to this process. I especially appreciate the care with which you raised concerns last week about health, safety, and neighborhood welfare — concerns that we share and are actively working to address. Delta Chi is more than just a student residence — it is a space where young men are growing, learning, and becoming accountable leaders. Academic excellence is at the core of our fraternity’s values. We consistently rank among the top fraternities on campus for GPA, and that’s no accident. We prioritize study groups, peer mentorship, and a culture of mutual academic support. These are not just internal benefits — they reflect the kind of contribution we want to make to our community. We also understand that with privilege comes responsibility. That’s why we’ve taken steps to strengthen continuity and accountability within our organization. We've brought our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation into the process to ensure long-term support and oversight. We’ve elected next year’s leadership and have already begun a values-based transition. Our goal is not to be temporarily compliant, but to be sustainably constructive partners in this community. Revoking our CUP would move us — and likely other chapters — outside of a framework where expectations, oversight, and accountability are possible. Instead, we ask that the Commission view this as an opportunity: to lead a conversation on modernizing and improving the CUP framework so it can better serve both neighborhood needs and the positive potential of student organizations. We are ready and willing to work with you, and we respectfully ask for the chance to continue growing in partnership with the city. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jakob Zuckermandel Immediate Past President, Delta Chi Fraternity 91 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2025 10:00 AM To:CityClerk Cc:Symens, Sadie Subject:06/11/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 3b BCC: PC Members and Staff Hello, Linked below is the agenda correspondence for the June 11, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. Item 3b – ADOPT RESOLUTION OF REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY USE AT 1236 MONTE VISTA PLACE - Green Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 92 From:Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2025 9:54 AM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:PC Communication: Please consider removing item 3b from the consent calendar from the June 11th Planning Commission Meeting Good evening Commissioners, My name is Chris Green, the President with the Delta Chi Fraternity for the upcoming school year. Thank you for your service to our city. Please consider removing item 3b from the consent calendar to discuss the Draft Resolution to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for use of 1236 Monte Vista Place as a fraternity. After the extensive conversation last week about the real concerns raised by the community and discussions of how best to find a solution moving forward, we would like to work collaboratively on how we can work to address those concerns and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be a good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. Revoking our permit and requiring us to reapply over modifying the existing permit will cost our organization up to $11,000 dollars, which would need to be covered by our members, many of which have summer jobs and jobs while in school to cover rent and tuition. Instead of revoking the permit, we would like to find a way to develop the Conditional Use Permit framework in a manner that gives the commissioners comfort in approving the findings. The resolution language was not before the commission last week during the discussion, and because of the significant discussion last week on the decision at hand, an opportunity for the discussion of the resolution language would ensure it fully encompasses the prior discussion. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city and would appreciate the opportunity for a discussion with the city on how we can move forward to remain within the fold of being a good partner with the community. Thank you, Chris Green -------------------------------------------------------- Chris Green President Delta Chi Fraternity California Polytechnic State University president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com ( 89 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2025 10:06 AM To:Chris Green Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: PC Communication: Please consider removing item 3b from the consent calendar from the June 11th Planning Commission Meeting Hi Chris, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for tonight’s meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 9:54 AM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: PC Communication: Please consider removing item 3b from the consent calendar from the June 11th Planning Commission Meeting Good evening Commissioners, My name is Chris Green, the President with the Delta Chi Fraternity for the upcoming school year. Thank you for your service to our city. Please consider removing item 3b from the consent calendar to discuss the Draft Resolution to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for use of 1236 Monte Vista Place as a fraternity. After the extensive conversation last week about the real concerns raised by the community and discussions of how best to find a solution moving forward, we would like to work collaboratively on how we can work to address those concerns and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be a good example of what a Fraternity can 90 be as a neighbor. Revoking our permit and requiring us to reapply over modifying the existing permit will cost our organization up to $11,000 dollars, which would need to be covered by our members, many of which have summer jobs and jobs while in school to cover rent and tuition. Instead of revoking the permit, we would like to find a way to develop the Conditional Use Permit framework in a manner that gives the commissioners comfort in approving the findings. The resolution language was not before the commission last week during the discussion, and because of the significant discussion last week on the decision at hand, an opportunity for the discussion of the resolution language would ensure it fully encompasses the prior discussion. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city and would appreciate the opportunity for a discussion with the city on how we can move forward to remain within the fold of being a good partner with the community. Thank you, Chris Green -------------------------------------------------------- Chris Green President Delta Chi Fraternity California Polytechnic State University president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com ( 107 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 6:58 PM To:McDonald, Whitney Subject:FW: Delta Chi Fraternity Conditional Use Permit - Partnering on a Solution Hi Whitney, I will reply and can meet with them about paths forward and how to stay involved in the conversation. Please let me know if you would like to be involved, but otherwise I will keep this in CDD for now…. Thanks, Timmi From: Christopher Nielsen < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 4:04 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Evan Moffit < ; Subject: Delta Chi Fraternity Conditional Use Permit - Partnering on a Solution Hello Madame City Manager McDonald and Director Tway, My name is Chris Nielsen, a member of the Cal Poly Delta Chi Alumni Board of Trustees. Thank you for your team's diligent work on the Conditional Use Permit board packet from May 28th. A lot of work went into that report, the detailed presentation, and in crafting proposed revisions to the CUP. During the May 28th Planning Commission meeting, we witnessed the frustrations with the community and the challenges between the community and the greek organizations. We heard the Commissioners speak about the need for a shock to the system to make real progress in the area. I am sorry to have put you all in this position, and as a volunteer alumni board, we could have done a lot more to facilitate creating a better relationship with the city and neighborhoods and ensuring continuity between leadership of our organization from year to year. I appreciate addressing this issue is a council priority and that it will be adopted as part of the June financial plan to begin engaging stakeholders. We would like to work with you in this process to create a sustainable framework for a CUP going forward while also partnering with the city on how to create alignment across the greek organizations at Cal Poly. While I understand there will be an adoption of a resolution tomorrow of the vote taken last week, and we may not be able to unring that bell, the organization would like to look to helping develop a workable CUP model. I can imagine you and your entire team are very busy, but if you would be willing, I would appreciate finding a time to discuss how we can go forward from here and for Delta Chi to be a partner in advancing a framework for CUPs that work for the city, residents, and the organization. I would be happy to meet with you via zoom/teams or a phone call at your earliest convenience. 108 My cell is Thank you again for the consideration, and I look forward to hearing from you. Chris -- Chris Nielsen 109 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 4:06 PM To:Stowe, Lala; Wooten, Eric; Smith, Adria Cc:LaFreniere, Matt; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Menesez, Marjorie; City_Attorney; CityClerk; Scott, Rick; Schafer, Aaron Subject:RE: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Attachments:PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records.pdf Thanks Lala! Also cc’ing PD staff for call log records. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:26 PM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org>; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Attached is what code initially found in response to this request. I have asked about alternate addresses and will update you when I hear back. Lala Stowe pronouns she/her/hers Supervising Administrative Assistant Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E lstowe@slocity.org T 805.783.7870 slocity.org 110 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11:53 AM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records I checked on the appeals are there are no responsive records for the addresses listed and the time period specified. However, could CDD check on these properties to see if there are additional addresses associated with these? I think some of the frats have multiple street addresses for a given property. It’s possible there would be appeals/citations/complaints listed for a different street address, but the same property. Thanks! From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 4:01 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Hi all, Attached is a Public Records request from Yiming Luo for Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records, due by 06/14/2025. If you are not able to meet that deadline, please advise. Otherwise, please send the requested responsive documents to cityclerk@slocity.org. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications To:CityClerk Subject:Re: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Forgot toadd this - isthere any document orspreadsheet orchart that thecity has showing allnoise complaints received, founded or unfounded, and sorted byfraternity/property? Thanks, Yiming From: Yiming Luo Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:41 PM To: CityClerk@slocity.org <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Hi, I'mrequesting police records ofcalls made tothefollowing addresses, aswell asany citations issued from 9/10/2023 to 6/4/2025 forany reason, such asnoise, any appeals, andany determinations made from those appeals. 720 E. Foothill Blvd 1700 Fredericks 281 Albert 388 Chaplin 1861 Slack 1868 Loomis 1555 Slack Thanks, Yiming 1 111 From:Christopher Nielsen < Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 4:04 PM To:McDonald, Whitney; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc: Evan Moffit; Subject:Delta Chi Fraternity Conditional Use Permit - Partnering on a Solution Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hello Madame City Manager McDonald and Director Tway, My name is Chris Nielsen, a member of the Cal Poly Delta Chi Alumni Board of Trustees. Thank you for your team's diligent work on the Conditional Use Permit board packet from May 28th. A lot of work went into that report, the detailed presentation, and in crafting proposed revisions to the CUP. During the May 28th Planning Commission meeting, we witnessed the frustrations with the community and the challenges between the community and the greek organizations. We heard the Commissioners speak about the need for a shock to the system to make real progress in the area. I am sorry to have put you all in this position, and as a volunteer alumni board, we could have done a lot more to facilitate creating a better relationship with the city and neighborhoods and ensuring continuity between leadership of our organization from year to year. I appreciate addressing this issue is a council priority and that it will be adopted as part of the June financial plan to begin engaging stakeholders. We would like to work with you in this process to create a sustainable framework for a CUP going forward while also partnering with the city on how to create alignment across the greek organizations at Cal Poly. While I understand there will be an adoption of a resolution tomorrow of the vote taken last week, and we may not be able to unring that bell, the organization would like to look to helping develop a workable CUP model. I can imagine you and your entire team are very busy, but if you would be willing, I would appreciate finding a time to discuss how we can go forward from here and for Delta Chi to be a partner in advancing a framework for CUPs that work for the city, residents, and the organization. I would be happy to meet with you via zoom/teams or a phone call at your earliest convenience. My cell is Thank you again for the consideration, and I look forward to hearing from you. Chris -- Chris Nielsen 112 From:Terry Reeves < Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:26 PM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:Juan Fernandez; John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs Subject:Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory. Thank you for the chat as well. It's fine to list me as the representative. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:16 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Terry and Juan, Thanks for the chat earlier today. I wanted to let you know I found the Draft Resolutions that are going on consent to Planning Commission tomorrow night for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s revocations. You can access the drafts by clicking the paper clip icons on the item here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=711b6ba9- e00c-4566-ab59-02a00d530d05&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=10&Tab=attachments . The language for my draft resolution will be similar to these, and if edits are made tomorrow night, my draft will likely reflect the final adopted Resolutions. One question regarding your review (USE-0334-2025), and sorry if you answered this already and I missed it – Would you like me to list Terry Reeves (Alumni Corporation President) as the representative on the agenda staff report? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 113 From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:10 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill That would be perfect- thanks! Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 14:08, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, We prefer to use our City Teams meetings. I can send you the link shortly. Would you like me to invite everyone who is on this email thread? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 114 From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am-1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006. 115 png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE- 0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 116 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.asp x?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HU h_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org 117 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE- 0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. 118 As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.a spx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.a spx?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx? id=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! 119 Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.pn g><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( -- Terry 120 From:Stowe, Lala Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:26 PM To:Wooten, Eric; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Cc:LaFreniere, Matt; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); City_Attorney; CityClerk Subject:Re: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Attachments:720 Foothill Blvd Declaration[PLUS]1st AdCit[PLUS]1st AdInv[PLUS]1stTenCopy 02-14-2025.pdf; 720 Foothill Blvd 2AC DEC [PLUS] 2AC [PLUS] 2AC INV [PLUS] 2AC OWNER'S NOV COPY [PLUS] 2AC TENANT'S NOV COPY 03-19-2025.pdf 1.pdf; 281 Albert Dr Rush Event NOV 01-18-2025.pdf; 388 Chaplin Ln Rush Event TENANT'S NOV COPY 01-18-2025.pdf.pdf; 1866 Loomis St Land Use Violation NOV 06-04-2025.pdf; CODE-000149-2024 - NOV - Fraternity Event.pdf Attached is what code initially found in response to this request. I have asked about alternate addresses and will update you when I hear back. Lala Stowe pronouns she/her/hers Supervising Administrative Assistant Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E lstowe@slocity.org T 805.783.7870 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11:53 AM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records I checked on the appeals are there are no responsive records for the addresses listed and the time period specified. However, could CDD check on these properties to see if there are additional addresses associated with these? I think some of the frats have multiple street addresses for a given property. It’s possible there would be appeals/citations/complaints listed for a different street address, but the same property. Thanks! From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 4:01 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records 121 Hi all, Attached is a Public Records request from Yiming Luo for Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records, due by 06/14/2025. If you are not able to meet that deadline, please advise. Otherwise, please send the requested responsive documents to cityclerk@slocity.org. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation (Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation) January 28, 2025 Adams Family Investments Solano Beach, CA 92075 SUBJECT ADDRESS: 281 Albert Dr San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-322-009 Code Case #: CODE-000018-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff has been made aware of violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code located at 281 Albert Dr Within the City of San Luis Obispo, a fraternity or sorority requires a use permit when within the R-3 & R-4 zones and is not allowed within the R-1 & R-2 zones as described in section 17.10.020 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The city defines a Fraternity/Sorority as: Residence for college or university students who are members of a social or educational association that is affiliated and in good standing with the California Polytechnic State University and where such an association also holds meetings or gatherings. (SLOMC 17.156.014). In summary, a location meets the definition of a fraternity or sorority when it houses fraternity/sorority members AND holds a meeting or gathering hosted by a social or educational association. On January 18th, 2024, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address: 1. Use regulations by zone (SLO MC §17.10.020): A. Allowed Uses: Uses within zones shall be regulated as set forth in Table 2-1; Uses Allowed by Zone, subject to subsections B through F of this section and additional regulations specified in the Specific Use Regulations Column of Table 2-1. Land uses are defined in Chapter 17.156 (Land Use Definitions). In Table 2-1, symbols shall have these meanings: A The use is allowed as matter of right MUP The use requires a minor use permit approved by the director, as provided in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure-Minor Use Permit). CUP The use requires a conditional use permit approved by the planning commission, as provided in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure-Minor Use Permit). M/A The use is allowed above the ground floor only. Subject to minor use permit review, the use may be established on the ground floor. Corrective Action: 1. Stop all fraternal gatherings, meetings, or activities at this property. 2. Remove any and all fraternal identifying markers from the property such as painted letters, brandings, or any item(s) similar to that in nature. We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s) immediately. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) as soon as possible will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies. Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org. Sincerely, RAMI SALEM Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator Cc: File Enclosures: Request for Directors Review Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation (Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation) January 29, 2025 388 Chaplin Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 SUBJECT ADDRESS: 388 Chaplin Ln San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-322-018 Code Case #: CODE-000022-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff has been made aware of violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code located at 388 Chaplin Ln Within the City of San Luis Obispo, a fraternity or sorority requires a use permit when within the R-3 & R-4 zones and is not allowed within the R-1 & R-2 zones as described in section 17.10.020 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The city defines a Fraternity/Sorority as: Residence for college or university students who are members of a social or educational association that is affiliated and in good standing with the California Polytechnic State University and where such an association also holds meetings or gatherings. (SLOMC 17.156.014). In summary, a location meets the definition of a fraternity or sorority when it houses fraternity/sorority members AND holds a meeting or gathering hosted by a social or educational association. On January 18th, 2024, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address: 1. Use regulations by zone (SLO MC §17.10.020): A. Allowed Uses: Uses within zones shall be regulated as set forth in Table 2-1; Uses Allowed by Zone, subject to subsections B through F of this section and additional regulations specified in the Specific Use Regulations Column of Table 2-1. Land uses are defined in Chapter 17.156 (Land Use Definitions). In Table 2-1, symbols shall have these meanings: A The use is allowed as matter of right MUP The use requires a minor use permit approved by the director, as provided in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure-Minor Use Permit). CUP The use requires a conditional use permit approved by the planning commission, as provided in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure-Minor Use Permit). M/A The use is allowed above the ground floor only. Subject to minor use permit review, the use may be established on the ground floor. Corrective Action: 1. Stop all fraternal gatherings, meetings, or activities at this property. 2. Remove any and all fraternal identifying markers from the property such as painted letters, brandings, or any item(s) similar to that in nature. We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s) immediately. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) as soon as possible will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies. Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org. Sincerely, RAMI SALEM Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator Cc: File Enclosures: Request for Directors Review Declaration of Service and Posting of Notice SUBJECT ADDRESS: 720 Foothill Blvd, San Luis Obispo, CA 9345 CASE NO.: 000024-2025 Citation No.: 00038774 Officer: Rami Salem I/we, the undersigned, declare that at all times herein mentioned, I/we were and now are a duly authorized employee(s) of the Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo, State of California; that pursuant to Section 1.24.050G of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (SLOMC), Section 1101.4 of the Uniform Housing Code, or Section 401.4 of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as adopted by Section 15.02.010 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, I/we deposited in a receptacle for the U.S. Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, by regular mail, and/or certified mail, return receipt requested the following: A Notice to Correct, Notice of Violation, Administrative Citation, Stop-Work Notice, Notice of Hearing, Notice of Proposed Lien, Notice of Special Assessment Notifying the owner of the property of the subject address referenced above of violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code existing on the property and/or of related abatement proceedings. The above notice was sent to each person having an interest in the property at their respective addresses as listed in the Notice, and a copy of the notice was posted at the subject address. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of 03, 2024, San Luis Obispo, California Officer or clerk effecting service by mail: Rami Salem Rami Salem 08:45 AM 03/19/2025 (Print Name) (Signature) (Time/date) Officer effecting service by posting: Rami Salem Rami Salem 010:00 AM 02/14/2025 (Print Name) (Signature) (Time/date) Citation No.: 00038774 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION AND ORDER TO COMPLY WITH SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE 1st Citation 2nd Citation 3rd Citation Additional / Daily Fines ADDRESS OF VIOLATION: 720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 APN:052-041-064 DATE OF VIOLATION: 01/29/2025 NAME: Cesar Ayon – Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corp A CA Corp ADDRESS: P O Box 42 Gonzales, CA 93926 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 1.24 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO IMMEDIATELY CORRECT THE VIOLATION(S) DESCRIBED BELOW AND PAY THE FINE. YOU ARE FURTHER ORDERED TO CEASE THE ACTIVITY GIVING RISE TO THE VIOLATION. WHEN CORRECTIONS ARE COMPLETE PLEASE SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION BY CALLING (805)781-7180. TO AVOID ADDITIONAL FINES COMPLIANCE MUST BE VERIFIED BY DEPARTMENT STAFF. IF DAILY FINES APPLY AS NOTED ABOVE, THE FINES SHALL ACCRUE DAILY UNTIL THE VIOLATION(S) ARE CORRECTED. FAILURE TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION(S) WILL RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS AND ESCALATING FINES OR OTHER ENFORCEMENT ACTION. CODE SECTION DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION FINE MC § 17.76.060 “It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon: Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement or land use permit.” $100 Amount Due $100 Failure to pay the fines may result in the suspension of any pending applications or permits. Unpaid fines become delinquent after 30 days and are subject to interest accrual of 8% per month as contained in SLOMC 1.24.070 C. The City may pursue all legal, equitable, and administrative remedies for the collection of unpaid civil administrative fines. Delinquent fines will be forwarded to a collection agency for payment. Mail Payments to: City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development Department 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 [Type text] You may file an APPEAL of this Administrative Citation by submitting a request in writing to the Hearing Administrator within ten days of the date this Administrative Citation is issued as shown below. Each responsible party is individually required to file an appeal. FAILURE TO FILE AN APPEAL WILL WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO CONTEST THIS CITATION. Please see the attached Appeal Form for more information. Mail Appeals to: City of San Luis Obispo, City Clerk 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Issued By: Rami Salem Signature: Rami Salem Title: Code Enforcement Officer RELATED CE CASE: CODE-000024-2025 DATE CITATION ISSUED: 03/19/2025 INVOICE (00038774) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT CESAR AYON ALPHA UPSILON ALUMNI CORP A CA CORP GONZALES, CA 93926 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00038774 03/19/2025 04/18/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL CODE-000024-2025 NSS 2nd Admin Citation $100.00 $100.00 SUBTOTAL720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 TOTAL $100.00 REMITTANCE INFORMATION Report Text Library: Municipality_Invoice_Remit_To Address Line 2 Address Line 3 Address Line 4 *00038774* City of San Luis ObispoMarch 19, 2025 Page 1 of 1 Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation (Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation) January 29, 2025 Cesar Ayon Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corp A CA Corp P O BOX 42 Gonzales, CA 93926 SUBJECT ADDRESS: 720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-041-064 Code Case #: CODE-000024-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address: 1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC §17.76.060) “It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon: 1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement or land use permit.” Conditions number nine and twelve of the use permit associated with the property indicate that: “9. No meetings, parties, or other types of similar activities that would violate City Noise Ordinances or other City regulations are allowed; or that would exceed the maximum 21 persons provisions noted in the above condition may take place between the hours of 10 pm and 9 am, except as approved by the Community Development Director. 12. Events, including meetings or parties, on site, shall be limited to those listed on a meeting and activities schedule, submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director in the fall of each year. Exceptions to this schedule must be approved by the Community Development Director. If the Director determines the change is significant and may have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, then it will be referred to the planning Commission for consideration.” There are multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police contacts between 2/01/2024 and 01/03/2025. Code enforcement staff will be recommending review of the use permit to the Deputy Director of Community Development. A determination made by the Deputy Director that the evidence submitted warrants review, modification, or revocation of the current use permit by the Planning Commission will be followed by notification to the property owner and other responsible parties. We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s). Immediate compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) by the specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies. Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org. Sincerely, RAMI SALEM Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator Cc: File Enclosures: Request for Directors Review Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation (Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation) January 29, 2025 720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 SUBJECT ADDRESS: 720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-041-064 Code Case #: CODE-000024-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address: 1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC §17.76.060) “It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon: 1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement or land use permit.” Conditions number nine and twelve of the use permit associated with the property indicate that: “9. No meetings, parties, or other types of similar activities that would violate City Noise Ordinances or other City regulations are allowed; or that would exceed the maximum 21 persons provisions noted in the above condition may take place between the hours of 10 pm and 9 am, except as approved by the Community Development Director. 12. Events, including meetings or parties, on site, shall be limited to those listed on a meeting and activities schedule, submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director in the fall of each year. Exceptions to this schedule must be approved by the Community Development Director. If the Director determines the change is significant and may have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, then it will be referred to the planning Commission for consideration.” There are multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police contacts between 2/01/2024 and 01/03/2025. Code enforcement staff will be recommending review of the use permit to the Deputy Director of Community Development. A determination made by the Deputy Director that the evidence submitted warrants review, modification, or revocation of the current use permit by the Planning Commission will be followed by notification to the property owner and other responsible parties. We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s). Immediate compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) by the specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies. Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org. Sincerely, RAMI SALEM Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator Cc: File Enclosures: Request for Directors Review Declaration of Service and Posting of Notice SUBJECT ADDRESS: 720 Foothill Blvd, San Luis Obispo, CA 9345 CASE NO.: 000024-2025 Citation No.: 00038463 Officer: Rami Salem I/we, the undersigned, declare that at all times herein mentioned, I/we were and now are a duly authorized employee(s) of the Community Development Department, City of San Luis Obispo, State of California; that pursuant to Section 1.24.050G of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (SLOMC), Section 1101.4 of the Uniform Housing Code, or Section 401.4 of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, as adopted by Section 15.02.010 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, I/we deposited in a receptacle for the U.S. Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, by regular mail, and/or certified mail, return receipt requested the following: A Notice to Correct, Notice of Violation, Administrative Citation, Stop-Work Notice, Notice of Hearing, Notice of Proposed Lien, Notice of Special Assessment Notifying the owner of the property of the subject address referenced above of violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code existing on the property and/or of related abatement proceedings. The above notice was sent to each person having an interest in the property at their respective addresses as listed in the Notice, and a copy of the notice was posted at the subject address. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this XX day of XX, 2024, San Luis Obispo, California Officer or clerk effecting service by mail: Rami Salem Rami Salem 01:17 PM 02/14/2025 (Print Name) (Signature) (Time/date) Officer effecting service by posting: Rami Salem Rami Salem 01:17 PM 02/14/2025 (Print Name) (Signature) (Time/date) Citation No.:00038463 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION AND ORDER TO COMPLY WITH SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE 1st Citation 2nd Citation 3rd Citation Additional / Daily Fines LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 APN:052-041-064 DATE OF VIOLATION: 01/29/2025 NAME: Cesar Ayon – Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corp A CA Corp ADDRESS: P O Box 42 Gonzales, CA 93926 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 1.24 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO IMMEDIATELY CORRECT THE VIOLATION(S) DESCRIBED BELOW AND PAY THE FINE. YOU ARE FURTHER ORDERED TO CEASE THE ACTIVITY GIVING RISE TO THE VIOLATION. WHEN CORRECTIONS ARE COMPLETE PLEASE SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION BY CALLING (805)781-7180. TO AVOID ADDITIONAL FINES COMPLIANCE MUST BE VERIFIED BY DEPARTMENT STAFF. IF DAILY FINES APPLY AS NOTED ABOVE, THE FINES SHALL ACCRUE DAILY UNTIL THE VIOLATION(S) ARE CORRECTED. FAILURE TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION(S) WILL RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS AND ESCALATING FINES OR OTHER ENFORCEMENT ACTION. CODE SECTION DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION FINE MC § 17.76.060 “It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon: 1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement or land use permit.” $50 Amount Due $50 Failure to pay the fines may result in the suspension of any pending applications or permits. Unpaid fines become delinquent after 30 days and are subject to interest accrual of 8% per month as contained in SLOMC 1.24.070 C. The City may pursue all legal, equitable, and administrative remedies for the collection of unpaid civil administrative fines. Delinquent fines will be forwarded to a collection agency for payment. Mail Payments to: City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development Department 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 You may file an APPEAL of this Administrative Citation by submitting a request in writing to the Hearing Administrator within ten days of the date this Administrative Citation is issued as shown below. Each responsible party is individually required to file an appeal. FAILURE TO FILE AN APPEAL WILL WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO CONTEST THIS CITATION. Please see the attached Appeal Form for more information. [Type text] Mail Appeals to: City of San Luis Obispo, City Clerk 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Issued By: Rami Salem Signature: Rami Salem Title: Code Enforcement Officer RELATED CE CASE: CODE-000024-2025 DATE CITATION ISSUED: 02/14/2025 INVOICE (00038463) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT CESAR AYON ALPHA UPSILON ALUMNI CORP A CA CORP GONZALES, CA 93926 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00038463 02/14/2025 03/16/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL CODE-000024-2025 NSS 1st Admin Citation $50.00 $50.00 SUBTOTAL720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 TOTAL $50.00 REMITTANCE INFORMATION Report Text Library: Municipality_Invoice_Remit_To Address Line 2 Address Line 3 Address Line 4 *00038463* City of San Luis ObispoFebruary 14, 2025 Page 1 of 1 Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation (Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation) January 29, 2025 720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 SUBJECT ADDRESS: 720 Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-041-064 Code Case #: CODE-000024-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address: 1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC §17.76.060) “It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon: 1. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement or land use permit.” Conditions number nine and twelve of the use permit associated with the property indicate that: “9. No meetings, parties, or other types of similar activities that would violate City Noise Ordinances or other City regulations are allowed; or that would exceed the maximum 21 persons provisions noted in the above condition may take place between the hours of 10 pm and 9 am, except as approved by the Community Development Director. 12. Events, including meetings or parties, on site, shall be limited to those listed on a meeting and activities schedule, submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director in the fall of each year. Exceptions to this schedule must be approved by the Community Development Director. If the Director determines the change is significant and may have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, then it will be referred to the planning Commission for consideration.” There are multiple confirmed administrative citations, noise violations, and police contacts between 2/01/2024 and 01/03/2025. Code enforcement staff will be recommending review of the use permit to the Deputy Director of Community Development. A determination made by the Deputy Director that the evidence submitted warrants review, modification, or revocation of the current use permit by the Planning Commission will be followed by notification to the property owner and other responsible parties. We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s). Immediate compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) by the specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies. Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org. Sincerely, RAMI SALEM Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator Cc: File Enclosures: Request for Directors Review Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation (Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation) 06/04/2025 Steven Ferrario Rukeri Inc San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1866 Loomis St San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-231-013 Code Case #: CODE-000153-2025 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff has been made aware of violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code located at 1866 Loomis St Within the City of San Luis Obispo, a fraternity or sorority requires a use permit when within the R-3 & R-4 zones and is not allowed within the R-1 & R-2 zones as described in section 17.10.020 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The city defines a Fraternity/Sorority as: Residence for college or university students who are members of a social or educational association that is affiliated and in good standing with the California Polytechnic State University and where such an association also holds meetings or gatherings. (SLOMC 17.156.014). In summary, a location meets the definition of a fraternity or sorority when it houses fraternity/sorority members AND holds a meeting or gathering hosted by a social or educational association. On 06/04/2025 City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address: 1. Use regulations by zone (SLO MC §17.10.020): A. Allowed Uses: Uses within zones shall be regulated as set forth in Table 2-1; Uses Allowed by Zone, subject to subsections B through F of this section and additional regulations specified in the Specific Use Regulations Column of Table 2-1. Land uses are defined in Chapter 17.156 (Land Use Definitions). In Table 2-1, symbols shall have these meanings: A The use is allowed as matter of right MUP The use requires a minor use permit approved by the director, as provided in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure-Minor Use Permit). CUP The use requires a conditional use permit approved by the planning commission, as provided in Section 17.110.030 (Procedure-Minor Use Permit). M/A The use is allowed above the ground floor only. Subject to minor use permit review, the use may be established on the ground floor. Corrective Action: 1. Stop all fraternal gatherings, meetings, or activities at this property. 2. Remove any and all fraternal identifying markers from the property such as painted letters, brandings, or any item(s) similar to that in nature. We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s) immediately. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) as soon as possible will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies. Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review. We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (805) 440-9825 or rsalem@slocity.org. Sincerely, RAMI SALEM Rami Salem, Code Enforcement Technician & Safe Housing Coordinator Cc: File Enclosures: Request for Directors Review Notice to Correct Code Violation(s)/Notice of Violation (Courtesy Warning Prior to Issuance of Administrative Citation) April 25, 2024 Fredericks LLC Templeton, CA 93465-8714 SUBJECT ADDRESS: 1700 Fredericks St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405-2006 APN: 052-324-017 Code Case #: CODE-000149-2024 Dear Property Owner, City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address: 1. The subject address has been identified as a fraternity/sorority located with the R1 zone. The current use of a fraternity/sorority requires a use permit when within the R-3 & R-4 zones and is not allowed within the R-1 & R-2 zones as described in Table 2-1 of the following cited section of the municipal code. See attached table for specific uses allowed by zone. The city defines a Fraternity/Sorority as: Residence for college or university students who are members of a social or educational association that is affiliated and in good standing with the California Polytechnic State University and where such an association also holds meetings or gatherings. (SLOMC 17.156.014). In brief, a location meets the definition of a fraternity or sorority when it houses fraternity/sorority members AND holds a meeting or gathering hosted by a social or educational association. Cal Poly defines a recognized satellite house as any residence where the majority of occupants are members of the chapter. The subject address has been identified as a recognized satellite house by Cal Poly. Additionally, at least three sanctioned events have been reported to occur as part of the annual report published by Cal Poly as required by the Campus-Recognized Sorority and Fraternity Transparency Act (AB 524; Sections 66310-66312 of California Education Code). As a result of the above-mentioned determination and records, the subject address meets the definition of a fraternity/sorority and is subject to the City’s use regulations as cited below. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code § 17.10.020: Use regulations by zone. Allowed uses. Uses within zones shall be regulated as set forth in Table 2-1: Uses Allowed by Zone, subject to subsections B through F of this section and additional regulations specified in the Specific Use Regulations column of Table 2-1. Land uses are defined in Chapter 17.156 (Land Use Definitions). In Table 2-1, symbols shall have these meanings: A The use is allowed as a matter of right. MUP The use requires a minor use permit approved by the director, as provided in Section17.110.030 (Procedure— Minor Use Permit). CUP The use requires a conditional use permit approved by the planning commission, as provided in Section17.110.040 (Procedure—Conditional Use Permit). A/M The use is allowed above the ground floor only. Subject to minor use permit review, the use may be established on the ground floor. Corrective Action: Please cease all use of the subject address as a fraternity/sorority. Additionally, cease all events that are associated with a fraternity or sorority. Any future verified events at this location may result in the issuance of fines. If the location is within the R-3/R-4 zone, and a fraternity/sorority is desired, please contact the city Planning Department at (805)781-7170 to determine if the location can be permitted to meet current zoning regulations and the required steps for submittal. ALL REQUIRED WORK MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. We request that you voluntarily take action to correct the above noted violation(s). Please ensure compliance with these regulations by 5/28/24 . These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) by the specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies. Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department via email at code@slocity.org or to 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned Officer at (805) 783-7872 or nbuckley@slocity.org. Sincerely, ____________________________ Nick Buckley, Code Enforcement Officer Cc: Enclosures: Request for Directors Review, Table 2-1 122 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:17 PM To:Juan Fernandez; Terry Reeves Cc:John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Terry and Juan, Thanks for the chat earlier today. I wanted to let you know I found the Draft Resolutions that are going on consent to Planning Commission tomorrow night for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s revocations. You can access the drafts by clicking the paper clip icons on the item here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=711b6ba9-e00c-4566- ab59-02a00d530d05&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=10&Tab=attachments . The language for my draft resolution will be similar to these, and if edits are made tomorrow night, my draft will likely reflect the final adopted Resolutions. One question regarding your review (USE-0334-2025), and sorry if you answered this already and I missed it – Would you like me to list Terry Reeves (Alumni Corporation President) as the representative on the agenda staff report? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:10 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill That would be perfect- thanks! Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 14:08, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: 123 Hi Juan, We prefer to use our City Teams meetings. I can send you the link shortly. Would you like me to invite everyone who is on this email thread? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am-1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 124 From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE- 0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list 125 the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx ?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HU h_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield 126 On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE- 0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.a spx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?i d=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for 127 the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( 128 From:Crystal Bradshaw < Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 1:22 PM To:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Corey, Tyler; Sheats, Steven Subject:Re: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Thanks Andrea! I forgot to mention that the reason this has become such a notable issue in this particular neighborhood is that most of the homes were built in the early 1990s and are quite large, with a high number of bedrooms. Since SLO follows the Santa Barbara standard of two occupants per bedroom, many of these homes end up housing 6 to 12 residents—plus the frequent comings and goings of guests and friends. When you place that level of activity in a cul-de-sac within an R-1 zone, it quickly becomes overwhelming for the neighborhood. Here are a few examples from Cerro Ct:  167 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 3,037 sq ft  143 Cerro Ct – 4 bedrooms, 2,850 sq ft  128 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,303 sq ft  136 Cerro Ct – 3 bedrooms, 2,412 sq ft, plus two exterior rooms (262 sq ft and 263 sq ft) and a permitted second unit And from Cerro Romauldo:  109 Cerro Romauldo – 5 bedrooms, 2,650 sq ft I hope this helps provide some additional context. Best, Crystal Bradshaw On Jun 10, 2025, at 12:51 PM, Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> wrote: BCC: Council All Hi Crystal, Thank you for your email to Council Member Jan Marx and City Staff. I am including Timmi Tway, Director of Community Development and Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development who can provide more information and answers to the thread below. City Council Members and additional key City staff are bcc’d for their awareness on the issues sent to Council Member Marx. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II 129 City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 3:29 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Hello, I’m writing to follow up on my previous email from October regarding high occupancy and ongoing noise issues in R-1 zoning areas—specifically on Cerro Court & Cerro Romauldo in The Foothills planned subdivision. Although the homes in question are not technically fraternity houses, many are occupied by groups of more than eight students. They continue to cause frequent disturbances—loud parties, ongoing noise even outside of parties, parking congestion, and broader issues of neighborhood compatibility. The police were called out again just this past weekend. Neighbors continue to file complaints with both the police department and landlords, but we’ve seen very little change. We’ve asked that beer pong tables be removed from front yards since October—but nothing has been done. I understand there are broader housing challenges in California, and that San Luis Obispo is taking guidance from Santa Barbara city case law. However, this approach is coming at the expense of long-term residents who simply want to enjoy peace and quiet in their own homes and neighborhoods. The density is just not compatible. I’ve been following Planning Commission discussions related to fraternity houses and was wondering if there is any movement toward revisiting these issues more broadly in the city. Is the Planning Commission planning to take up concerns related to high-occupancy rentals in R- 1 zones or requiring CUP’s for houses that have more than 8 residents? Any updates or information you can share would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Crystal Bradshaw 130 “Foothills Subdivision Resident” On Oct 9, 2024, at 8:21 PM, Crystal Bradshaw < wrote: Hello Jan, Thank you so much for your response—I truly appreciate it. I’ve also reached out to Christine and Scott Heats at SLO City Code Enforcement to discuss these concerns further. Unfortunately, it seems that we have limited options when it comes to addressing the "apartmentization" of single-family residential (SFR) homes and the excessive number of vehicles parked in front of properties and on the street. 131 It’s disheartening to see that despite these concerns, compliance with Santa Barbara rules allows for this to happen. Our neighborhoods were not designed for 3-4 bedroom homes to house 6-10 adults, each with their own vehicle. Beyond fire safety concerns, it’s a significant livability issue, as you mentioned, for those of us who value having a peaceful place to call home. We are now facing a high-occupancy situation that goes beyond what one would expect in SFR-zoned areas—the kind of zoning we considered when we initially invested in these properties. While we can make noise complaints or call the police about the parking issues, these measures do not address the root problem. It often leaves us feeling like the situation is being overlooked, and the resulting frustration is disheartening. I would be very interested to learn whether the City Council might consider reassessing this situation. Are there any upcoming discussions or forums where this topic might be addressed? Thank you again for your time and consideration. Best regards, Crystal Bradshaw 132 On Oct 9, 2024, at 4:45 PM, Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> wrote: Thank you for your message, Crystal. I am sorry that you are having to deal with this disturbing issue in your neighborhood. I am including our City Manager and Community Relations specialist with the Police Department, Christine Wallace in this response. She has a lot of experience dealing with this city wide issue. I recommend calling the Police department with a noise complaint when your inconsiderate neighbors are loud late at night. The nonemergency number is (805) 781-7317. If the residents get a ticket, the landlord will as well. This often gets their attention. It is important to keep calling in noise complaints, so as to create a record. When I lived near Cal Poly, I would exchange cell phone numbers with the students and call them when they were too loud, telling them that if the noise did not stop in 20 minutes, I would call the police. You may also want to get in touch with Neighbors North of Foothill, a community organization that has been quite active in the past. John Ashbaugh may have their contact information. NNOF may need to be revived to protect livability in your neighborhood. Best wishes, Jan Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 1:11 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: SFR1 Occupancy https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/400-Prado-Rd-San-Luis- Obispo-CA- 93401/352449595_zpid/?utm_campaign=iosappmessage&utm_medi um=referral&utm_source=txtshare This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Hello Jan, My name is Crystal Bradshaw. I am Justin Bradshaw‘s wife, and John and Trisha Ashbaugh‘s across the street neighbor. I came across an article that said you had once spearheaded some efforts to work on the issue of overcrowding SFR-1 neighborhoods. Unfortunately, we too have been affected by investor landlords who pack their houses to the brim with too many occupants. I know that in 133 2019 the 5 person maximum was repealed and that there was caselaw out of Santa Barbara that the city is now adopts. I’m wondering if the issue has been completely closed at the city council. If so, I’d be interested in opening up the topic again. Recently two homes were sold on Cerro Court, the street behind mine. That cul-de-sac is now primarily rentals. Out of 7 homes 4 are high occupancy rentals, 2 are owner occupied and one is a part time residence. Cerro Ct. has become a nightmare for our neighborhood with lots of late night noise, far too many students per home, an over abundance of cars associated with each home, creating parking issues, etc. Despite our CC&R’s saying our neighbors should not be creating nuisances,The landlords seem to be very unwilling to do anything about it in consideration of their resident neighbors. We are left without much protection unless we want to spend a lot of money to sue our neighbors. This does not seem productive. I am in real estate, and own rental homes myself. I’ve also ran several vacation rentals. It seems backwards that the city Homestay ordinance only allows for 4 adults in a home, requires floor plans, recycling plans, parking plans, requires owners to available 24/7 and a complaint hotline, all to avoid neighborhood impact when the long- term rental rules are far less restrictive. Frankly, at this point, I’d rather have Homestays as neighbors than what we currently experience. They don’t even know how to get in touch with half of the landlords. The ones I do speak to have not been responsive to the problem. I’d like to find out if there are any solutions being worked on an how I could be part of a collaborative conversation with the city. My Best, Crystal Bradshaw 134 From:Anderson, Kiersten N. Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 1:02 PM To:Joan Dirstine; Duane Dirstine Subject:RE: Lemon Grove Hi Joan and Duane, Hoping this finds you both well and geƫng ready for a warm week if you're in SLO. Some news, as I had a note to follow up w ith you today re: our conversaƟon below: the CP fraternity decided to pause their volunteer service over the summer as members are away. I anƟcipated this occurring, but it was formally shared recently by their Community Services Chair. With that, I'm curious if you both may be interested in volunteering at Mission Plaza to conƟnue your BeauƟficaƟon Volunteer service aŌer tending to the Lemon Grove? I'd be happy to share more (e.g., Ɵmes and days that would be most helpful, spots to focus on, etc.) if you're sƟll interested and available. Even an hour or two / month would be a tremendous help, especially as we gear up for a busy summer season of acƟvity in the area. I look forward to hearing from you & wish you a great day, Kiersten -----Original Message----- From: Anderson, Kiersten N. Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 2:27 PM To: Joan DirsƟne < Subject: RE: Lemon Grove Hi Joan, Turns out that the Park Maintenance team won't need extra volunteers at the Mission Plaza for the next month... I have a calendar reminder to circle back with you mid-June. Some context: we have a CP fraternity adopƟng the park this Friday (Mission Plaza is a park) but their members haven't provided me with their summer schedules yet, so we might have a vacancy for you and Duane sooner than later if we can keep this conversaƟon going. Meanwhile, I have an inquiry into the City's BeauƟficaƟon Coordinator, Derron, to assess any projects he could use extra hands with... will let you know what I hear. 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Happy to speak to any of the other roles listed below & greatly appreciate your service, Kiersten -----Original Message----- From: Joan DirsƟne < Sent: Monday, May 12, 2025 7:29 PM To: Anderson, Kiersten N. <knanders@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Lemon Grove Hi Kiersten- Thank you for geƫng back to me so quickly. I’d love to hear more about the Mission Plaza one, can you give me the details on that? Thanks, Joan > On May 12, 2025, at 1:23 PM, Anderson, Kiersten N. <knanders@slocity.org> wrote: > 135 > Hi Joan, > > Thank you for leƫng me know and we greatly appreciate your and Duane's care for the lemon grove these past months. Are you up for a more public spot? If so, Mission Plaza could benefit from a few extra hands to help keep it in Ɵp top shape, especially as we move into summer with increased usage of the park. Other opƟons we're currently recruiƟng volunteers for, in order of priority include: > > - Whale Rock Reservoir Trail Support (one Tuesday/month, 9 AM - Noon, starƟng 5/20) - in Cayucos and a beauƟful seƫng helping to build out and maintain the trail system around the reservoir alongside a great crew of City staff. This is a new role we're trying to gain momentum with (ideally) regular volunteer ac Ɵvity. > > - Wednesday Workdays (each Wednesday from 8:45 AM - Noon) - Reservoir Canyon Open Space, building out the Bowden Trail alongside Rangers and other volunteers. > > - Finally, I'm not sure if it's in your neighborhood, but we are losing our Islay Hill Park volunteer for the summer and she's been doing some great work, under direcƟon of the Park Maintenance crew member out there, to improve the landscape. Think: planƟng projects, weeding, invasives removal, etc. It might be a hike for you, but that also comes to mind. > > Let me know if any of these spark interest and if not, I can connect > with Public Works to see if there are any other volunteer project > requests coming down the pike. 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 > > Many thanks, > Kiersten > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joan DirsƟne < > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2025 12:07 PM > To: Anderson, Kiersten N. <knanders@slocity.org> > Subject: Lemon Grove > > Hi Kiersten- > I hope all is well with you. John (the previous volunteer for the Lemon Grove) is back and tending to the trees again. Is there another area we can be of assistance with? > Best, > Joan > 136 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 12:52 PM To:Crystal Bradshaw Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Corey, Tyler; Sheats, Steven Subject:RE: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy BCC: Council All Hi Crystal, Thank you for your email to Council Member Jan Marx and City Staff. I am including Timmi Tway, Director of Community Development and Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development who can provide more information and answers to the thread below. City Council Members and additional key City staff are bcc’d for their awareness on the issues sent to Council Member Marx. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Crystal Bradshaw < Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 3:29 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Hello, I’m writing to follow up on my previous email from October regarding high occupancy and ongoing noise issues in R-1 zoning areas—specifically on Cerro Court & Cerro Romauldo in The Foothills planned subdivision. Although the homes in question are not technically fraternity houses, many are occupied by groups of more than eight students. They continue to cause frequent disturbances—loud parties, ongoing noise even outside of parties, parking congestion, and broader issues of neighborhood compatibility. The police were called out again just this past weekend. 137 Neighbors continue to file complaints with both the police department and landlords, but we’ve seen very little change. We’ve asked that beer pong tables be removed from front yards since October—but nothing has been done. I understand there are broader housing challenges in California, and that San Luis Obispo is taking guidance from Santa Barbara city case law. However, this approach is coming at the expense of long-term residents who simply want to enjoy peace and quiet in their own homes and neighborhoods. The density is just not compatible. I’ve been following Planning Commission discussions related to fraternity houses and was wondering if there is any movement toward revisiting these issues more broadly in the city. Is the Planning Commission planning to take up concerns related to high-occupancy rentals in R-1 zones or requiring CUP’s for houses that have more than 8 residents? Any updates or information you can share would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Crystal Bradshaw “Foothills Subdivision Resident” 138 139 On Oct 9, 2024, at 8:21 PM, Crystal Bradshaw < wrote: Hello Jan, Thank you so much for your response—I truly appreciate it. I’ve also reached out to Christine and Scott Heats at SLO City Code Enforcement to discuss these concerns further. Unfortunately, it seems that we have limited options when it comes to addressing the "apartmentization" of single- family residential (SFR) homes and the excessive number of vehicles parked in front of properties and on the street. It’s disheartening to see that despite these concerns, compliance with Santa Barbara rules allows for this to happen. Our neighborhoods were not designed for 3-4 bedroom homes to house 6-10 adults, each with their own vehicle. Beyond fire safety concerns, it’s a significant livability issue, as you mentioned, for those of us who value having a peaceful place to call home. We are now facing a high-occupancy situation that goes beyond what one would expect in SFR- zoned areas—the kind of zoning we considered when we initially invested in these properties. While we can make noise complaints or call the police about the parking issues, these measures do not address the root problem. It often leaves us feeling like the situation is being overlooked, and the resulting frustration is disheartening. I would be very interested to learn whether the City Council might consider reassessing this situation. Are there any upcoming discussions or forums where this topic might be addressed? Thank you again for your time and consideration. Best regards, Crystal Bradshaw 140 On Oct 9, 2024, at 4:45 PM, Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> wrote: Thank you for your message, Crystal. I am sorry that you are having to deal with this disturbing issue in your neighborhood. I am including our City Manager and Community Relations specialist with the Police Department, Christine Wallace in this response. She has a lot of experience dealing with this city wide issue. I recommend calling the Police department with a noise complaint when your inconsiderate neighbors are loud late at night. The nonemergency number is (805) 781-7317. If the residents get a ticket, the landlord will as well. This often gets their attention. It is important to keep calling in noise complaints, so as to create a record. When I lived near Cal Poly, I would exchange cell phone numbers with the students and call them when they were too loud, telling them that if the noise did not stop in 20 minutes, I would call the police. You may also want to get in touch with Neighbors North of Foothill, a community organization that has been quite active in the past. John Ashbaugh may have their contact information. NNOF may need to be revived to protect livability in your neighborhood. Best wishes, Jan Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 1:11 PM 141 To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: SFR1 Occupancy https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/400-Prado-Rd-San-Luis-Obispo-CA- 93401/352449595_zpid/?utm_campaign=iosappmessage&utm_medium=referral& utm_source=txtshare This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Hello Jan, My name is Crystal Bradshaw. I am Justin Bradshaw‘s wife, and John and Trisha Ashbaugh‘s across the street neighbor. I came across an article that said you had once spearheaded some efforts to work on the issue of overcrowding SFR-1 neighborhoods. Unfortunately, we too have been affected by investor landlords who pack their houses to the brim with too many occupants. I know that in 2019 the 5 person maximum was repealed and that there was caselaw out of Santa Barbara that the city is now adopts. I’m wondering if the issue has been completely closed at the city council. If so, I’d be interested in opening up the topic again. Recently two homes were sold on Cerro Court, the street behind mine. That cul-de- sac is now primarily rentals. Out of 7 homes 4 are high occupancy rentals, 2 are owner occupied and one is a part time residence. Cerro Ct. has become a nightmare for our neighborhood with lots of late night noise, far too many students per home, an over abundance of cars associated with each home, creating parking issues, etc. Despite our CC&R’s saying our neighbors should not be creating nuisances,The landlords seem to be very unwilling to do anything about it in consideration of their resident neighbors. We are left without much protection unless we want to spend a lot of money to sue our neighbors. This does not seem productive. I am in real estate, and own rental homes myself. I’ve also ran several vacation rentals. It seems backwards that the city Homestay ordinance only allows for 4 adults in a home, requires floor plans, recycling plans, parking plans, requires owners to available 24/7 and a complaint hotline, all to avoid neighborhood impact when the long-term rental rules are far less restrictive. Frankly, at this point, I’d rather have Homestays as neighbors than what we currently experience. They don’t even know how to get in touch with half of the landlords. The ones I do speak to have not been responsive to the problem. I’d like to find out if there are any solutions being worked on an how I could be part of a collaborative conversation with the city. My Best, 142 Crystal Bradshaw 143 From:Bob Jorgensen < Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11:26 AM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Hi Tyler, Just double checking that you saw my Monday email telling you I wound be present for Wednesday’s Planning Commission meeting. Sent from my iPhone Bob Jorgensen Begin forwarded message: From: Bob Jorgensen < Date: June 9, 2025 at 1:50:15 PM PDT To: "Corey, Tyler" <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Hi Tyler, I chose not to respond to Zuckermandel. I'm recovering in fits and starts from the hip replacement, Today I'm tired and having a bit of trouble even reading the Agenda packet. I now expect to be absent from the meeting june 11th. Bob On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 2:30 PM Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Bob, Sorry to hear about the hip replacement surgery and hoping you have a fast recovery. I have heard from Chair Houghton that he has also been contacted as well and would bet that all PC members have been contacted. Chair Houghton declined to meet with Mr. Zuckermandel. Here is the email I sent to Houghton earlier today on this matter: 144 “You are free to meet as you are with any applicant of a project on an agenda. If you choose to meet you will need to disclose this at the PC meeting on the 11th prior to taking action on the resolution language to revoke the Conditional use Permits. Just to be clear, the PC revoked the Conditional Use Permits for both fraternities at the 5/28 meeting and the CUPs are not up for discussion on the 11th, only the specific language of the revocation resolutions. Staff has also been contacted by Mr. Zuckermandel and we will be reaching out prior to the meeting to answer any questions.” Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bob Jorgensen < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:13 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community FYI, I just received this conversation request. Are other PC members being solicited as well? How would you suggest I handle it? 145 p .s. I had hip replacement surgery Tuesday and I’m not mobile right now. Actually not quite sure if I’m up for attending the June 11 Commission meeting. Sent from my iPhone Bob Jorgensen 146 From:Armas, Sara Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 3:58 PM To:David Houghton Cc:Eric Tolle; Cohen, Rachel; Purrington, Teresa Subject:06/11/2025 PC Script Attachments:PC Script for 06-11-2025.pdf Good afternoon Chair Houghton, Attached is the script for the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. We will make sure a printed copy is available for you on the dais. Currently we are not aware of any planned absences. Have a great day! Sara Armas pronouns she/her/hers Deputy City Clerk I City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E SArmas@slocity.org T 805.781.7110 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 Planning Commission Script June 11, 2025, 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER “Good evening, this is Chair Dave Houghton, and I would like to call this Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission to order. “Please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.” “Would City Clerk Teresa Purrington please call roll?” 2. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA “At this time, we will hear any public comment for items not on tonight’s agenda. Items raised are generally referred to staff and, if action by the Commission is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting.” “City Clerk, do we have any public comment on non-agenda items?” 3. CONSENT CONSENT “Consent calendar items consist of matters deemed routine and non- controversial by staff and are typically acted upon with one vote. However, if a member of the Commission wishes to pull an item for individual consideration, please say so now.” City Clerk, do we have any comments on Consent items?” *If any Consent Item is pulled, call for a vote on the Consent Items not pulled. If none are pulled, call for a vote on all items. “Before we vote, do any Commissioners have comments on Consent?” “Do I have a Motion and Second to approve Consent?” “Will the City Clerk please call the roll of the motion?” 2 3.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - MAY 28, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Recommendation: To approve the Planning Commission Minutes of May 28, 2025. 3.b ADOPT RESOLUTION OF REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY USE AT 1236 MONTE VISTA PLACE Recommendation: Adopt the Draft Resolution to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for use of 1236 Monte Vista Place as a fraternity. 3.c ADOPT RESOLUTION OF REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY USE AT 1304 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Recommendation: Adopt the Draft Resolution to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for use of 1304 Foothill Boulevard as a fraternity. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS “Any court challenge to the action taken on public hearing items on this agenda may be limited to considering only those issues raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City of San Luis Obispo at, or prior to, the public hearing. If you wish to speak, please give your name and address for the record. Please limit your comments to three minutes.” 4.a “The Public Hearing Item before us is to REVIEW AN APPEAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR’S DECISION TO APPROVE THE FENCE HEIGHT EXEMPTION APPLICATION AT 1425 SYDNEY STREET. “I would like to ask each Commissioner for their ex-parte disclosures of contact with anyone who has provided information to Commissioners not on the record, so that information may be used as part of their decision-making process.” “Would Assistant Planner Walter Oetzell please present the report?” 3 Recommendation: Adopt the Draft Resolution denying the appeal and upholding the decision of the Community Development Director approving the Fence Height Exception application FNCE-0686-2024. QUESTIONS OF STAFF *PC Members ask questions of staff “I will now open the Public Hearing. We will begin by giving 10 minutes to the Appellant. As a reminder, the appellant is entitled up to 10 minutes of public testimony and may reserve any portion of that 10 minutes for response. If you wish to reserve time, please let the City Clerk know before you begin, or they will make note if you have any time remaining after your presentation.” After the Appellant, the Applicant is entitled up to 10 minutes of public testimony and may reserve any portion of that 10 minutes for response. Please let the City Clerk know if you would like to reserve time for response. APPELLANT PRESENTATION – 10 minutes QUESTIONS OF APPELLANT *Call upon PC Members for questions and comments APPLICANT PRESENTATION – 10 minutes QUESTIONS OF APPLICANT *Call upon PC Members for questions and comments PUBLIC COMMENT “City Clerk, do we have any public comment on this item?” ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OF STAFF “Do any Commissioners have questions before we call for a vote?” VOTE PROCEDURE “Do I have a Motion and Second?” “We have a motion and a second, is there any further deliberation before we call roll?” “Will the City Clerk please call the roll of the motion?” 4 4.b “The Public Hearing item before us is to REVIEW A PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATED AT 3450 BROAD STREET. “I would like to ask each Commissioner for their ex-parte disclosures of contact with anyone who has provided information to Commissioners not on the record, so that information may be used as part of their decision-making process.” “Would Associate Planner Hannah Hanh please provide the report?” Recommendation: Approve the Moderate Development Review (ARCH-0672-2024) to allow the proposed building, site, and sign improvements; 1. Approve the Planned Development Amendment (PDEV-0673-2024) to allow the proposed change in use at the project site; 2. Approve the Conditional Use Permit (USE-0674-2024) to allow establishment and operation of the proposed school and daycare with reduced outdoor recreational area; 3. Approve the Tree Removal Application (TREE-0033-2025) to allow the proposed removal of 20 existing trees; 4. Approve the creek setback exception to allow installation of mechanical equipment within portions of the creek setback area; and 5. Allow the proposed fencing within the Open Space Easement area. QUESTIONS OF STAFF *PC Members ask questions of staff APPLICANT PRESENTATION (Limit to 10 minutes) The Applicant is entitled up to 10 minutes of public testimony and may reserve any portion of that 10 minutes for response. Please let the City Clerk know if you would like to reserve time for response. QUESTIONS OF APPLICANT *PC Members ask questions of the applicant PUBLIC COMMENT “Deputy City Clerk, do we have any public comment on this item?” 5 ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OF STAFF “Do any Commissioners have questions before we call for a vote?” VOTE PROCEDURE “Do I have a Motion and Second?” 5. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION 5.a STAFF UPDATES AND AGENDA FORECAST “Would Principal Planner Rachel Cohen please provide the update?” 6. ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for June 25, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. 147 From:Crystal Bradshaw < Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 3:29 PM To:Marx, Jan; McDonald, Whitney; Sheats, Steven Cc:Advisory Bodies Subject:Follow up-SFR1 Occupancy Hello, I’m writing to follow up on my previous email from October regarding high occupancy and ongoing noise issues in R-1 zoning areas—specifically on Cerro Court & Cerro Romauldo in The Foothills planned subdivision. Although the homes in question are not technically fraternity houses, many are occupied by groups of more than eight students. They continue to cause frequent disturbances—loud parties, ongoing noise even outside of parties, parking congestion, and broader issues of neighborhood compatibility. The police were called out again just this past weekend. Neighbors continue to file complaints with both the police department and landlords, but we’ve seen very little change. We’ve asked that beer pong tables be removed from front yards since October—but nothing has been done. I understand there are broader housing challenges in California, and that San Luis Obispo is taking guidance from Santa Barbara city case law. However, this approach is coming at the expense of long-term residents who simply want to enjoy peace and quiet in their own homes and neighborhoods. The density is just not compatible. I’ve been following Planning Commission discussions related to fraternity houses and was wondering if there is any movement toward revisiting these issues more broadly in the city. Is the Planning Commission planning to take up concerns related to high-occupancy rentals in R-1 zones or requiring CUP’s for houses that have more than 8 residents? Any updates or information you can share would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Crystal Bradshaw “Foothills Subdivision Resident” 148 149 On Oct 9, 2024, at 8:21 PM, Crystal Bradshaw < wrote: Hello Jan, Thank you so much for your response—I truly appreciate it. I’ve also reached out to Christine and Scott Heats at SLO City Code Enforcement to discuss these concerns further. Unfortunately, it seems that we have limited options when it comes to addressing the "apartmentization" of single- family residential (SFR) homes and the excessive number of vehicles parked in front of properties and on the street. It’s disheartening to see that despite these concerns, compliance with Santa Barbara rules allows for this to happen. Our neighborhoods were not designed for 3-4 bedroom homes to house 6-10 adults, each with their own vehicle. Beyond fire safety concerns, it’s a significant livability issue, as you mentioned, for those of us who value having a peaceful place to call home. We are now facing a high-occupancy situation that goes beyond what one would expect in SFR- zoned areas—the kind of zoning we considered when we initially invested in these properties. While we can make noise complaints or call the police about the parking issues, these measures do not address the root problem. It often leaves us feeling like the situation is being overlooked, and the resulting frustration is disheartening. I would be very interested to learn whether the City Council might consider reassessing this situation. Are there any upcoming discussions or forums where this topic might be addressed? Thank you again for your time and consideration. Best regards, Crystal Bradshaw The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. 150 On Oct 9, 2024, at 4:45 PM, Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> wrote: Thank you for your message, Crystal. I am sorry that you are having to deal with this disturbing issue in your neighborhood. I am including our City Manager and Community Relations specialist with the Police Department, Christine Wallace in this response. She has a lot of experience dealing with this city wide issue. I recommend calling the Police department with a noise complaint when your inconsiderate neighbors are loud late at night. The nonemergency number is (805) 781-7317. If the residents get a ticket, the landlord will as well. This often gets their attention. It is important to keep calling in noise complaints, so as to create a record. When I lived near Cal Poly, I would exchange cell phone numbers with the students and call them when they were too loud, telling them that if the noise did not stop in 20 minutes, I would call the police. You may also want to get in touch with Neighbors North of Foothill, a community organization that has been quite active in the past. John Ashbaugh may have their contact information. NNOF may need to be revived to protect livability in your neighborhood. Best wishes, Jan 151 Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 1:11 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: SFR1 Occupancy https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/400-Prado-Rd-San-Luis-Obispo-CA- 93401/352449595_zpid/?utm_campaign=iosappmessage&utm_medium=referral& utm_source=txtshare This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. ________________________________ Hello Jan, My name is Crystal Bradshaw. I am Justin Bradshaw‘s wife, and John and Trisha Ashbaugh‘s across the street neighbor. I came across an article that said you had once spearheaded some efforts to work on the issue of overcrowding SFR-1 neighborhoods. Unfortunately, we too have been affected by investor landlords who pack their houses to the brim with too many occupants. I know that in 2019 the 5 person maximum was repealed and that there was caselaw out of Santa Barbara that the city is now adopts. I’m wondering if the issue has been completely closed at the city council. If so, I’d be interested in opening up the topic again. Recently two homes were sold on Cerro Court, the street behind mine. That cul-de- sac is now primarily rentals. Out of 7 homes 4 are high occupancy rentals, 2 are owner occupied and one is a part time residence. Cerro Ct. has become a nightmare for our neighborhood with lots of late night noise, far too many students per home, an over abundance of cars associated with each home, creating parking issues, etc. Despite our CC&R’s saying our neighbors should not be creating nuisances,The landlords seem to be very unwilling to do anything about it in consideration of their resident neighbors. We are left without much protection unless we want to spend a lot of money to sue our neighbors. This does not seem productive. I am in real estate, and own rental homes myself. I’ve also ran several vacation rentals. It seems backwards that the city Homestay ordinance only allows for 4 adults in a home, requires floor plans, recycling plans, parking plans, requires owners to available 24/7 and a complaint hotline, all to avoid neighborhood impact when the long-term rental rules are far less restrictive. Frankly, at this point, I’d rather have Homestays as neighbors than what we currently experience. They don’t even know how to get in touch with half of the landlords. The ones I do speak to have not been responsive to the problem. I’d like to find out if there are any solutions being worked on an how I could be part of a collaborative conversation with the city. 152 My Best, Crystal Bradshaw 153 From:Bob Jorgensen < Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 1:50 PM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:Re: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Hi Tyler, I chose not to respond to Zuckermandel. I'm recovering in fits and starts from the hip replacement, Today I'm tired and having a bit of trouble even reading the Agenda packet. I now expect to be absent from the meeting june 11th. Bob On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 2:30 PM Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Bob, Sorry to hear about the hip replacement surgery and hoping you have a fast recovery. I have heard from Chair Houghton that he has also been contacted as well and would bet that all PC members have been contacted. Chair Houghton declined to meet with Mr. Zuckermandel. Here is the email I sent to Houghton earlier today on this matter: “You are free to meet as you are with any applicant of a project on an agenda. If you choose to meet you will need to disclose this at the PC meeting on the 11th prior to taking action on the resolution language to revoke the Conditional use Permits. Just to be clear, the PC revoked the Conditional Use Permits for both fraternities at the 5/28 meeting and the CUPs are not up for discussion on the 11th, only the specific language of the revocation resolutions. Staff has also been contacted by Mr. Zuckermandel and we will be reaching out prior to the meeting to answer any questions.” Let me know if you have any questions. Best, 154 Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bob Jorgensen < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:13 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community FYI, I just received this conversation request. Are other PC members being solicited as well? How would you suggest I handle it? p .s. I had hip replacement surgery Tuesday and I’m not mobile right now. Actually not quite sure if I’m up for attending the June 11 Commission meeting. Sent from my iPhone Bob Jorgensen Begin forwarded message: From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Date: June 5, 2025 at 12:13:31 PM PDT To: Cc: 155 Subject: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Good evening Commissioner Jorgenson My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you for service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members, particular about having their expectations met with conditional use permits. . Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city and would appreciate the opportunity to discuss how we can move forward to remain within the fold of being a good partner with the community. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel 156 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 12:34 PM To:Sophie Fontaine Subject:RE: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods 1pm works great. CW From: Sophie Fontaine < Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 12:23 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Hi, great thank you so much! Can you talk at 1? Or would another day or time be better? On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 9:09 AM Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Sophie, Happy to help. My desk line is 805-781-7186 and I’m here pretty much all day today. Thanks, Christine From: Sophie Fontaine < Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 4:55 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Hello Christine, My name is Sophie Fontaine, and I am a student at Cal Poly enrolled in a News Reporting and Writing class. I am currently working on a story about Greek life in San Luis Obispo and how it affects the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly in terms of housing, noise, and community relations. I’m hoping to speak with you about this topic, so I can get someone from the city's perspective, to better understand how local officials and residents view the presence of fraternities and sororities in residential areas. My deadline for this article is Wednesday, June 11, at midnight. for my class. I am available for a phone call on Monday or Tuesday between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. 157 Please let me know if you or someone else in your office might be available for a short interview. I believe it’s an important story that could help foster better understanding between students and long-term residents. You can reach me at ( or via email at Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear from you soon. Best, Sophie Fontaine 164 From:Sheryl Flores < Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 10:50 AM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community FYI, I received, but have not responded to this email. I presume that a similar email was sent to all commissioners. It seems as if it would be most appropriate for the applicants to talk to staff about the reapplication process. Please advise whether and how I should respond. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Date: Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 10:36 AM Subject: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community To: < Good morning Commissioner Flores, My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you for service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city and would appreciate the opportunity to discuss how we can move forward to remain within the fold of being a good partner with the community. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel 168 From:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 9:59 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:Re: Returned Payment for two citations - Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Sounds good! Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 9, 2025 at 9:56 AM To: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: RE: Returned Payment for two citations - Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Yes, given someone is checking the mail. It should have arrived last Friday. From: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 9:52 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Returned Payment for two citations - Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Thanks! The boys should have been notified themselves too, right? Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 9, 2025 at 9:25 AM To: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: FW: Returned Payment for two citations - Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Hi, FYI on AEPi attempted citation payments. 169 Thanks, CW From: Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 6:08 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Returned Payment for two citations - Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Hi Christine, We are sending out two returned check notifications for citation payments made my Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity. If they reach out to you, feel free to forward them over to me. Thanks, Maryanna Espejo-Moses pronouns she/her/hers Financial Analyst Finance 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mespejo@slocity.org T 805.781.7148 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 171 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 9:09 AM To:Sophie Fontaine Subject:RE: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Hi Sophie, Happy to help. My desk line is 805-781-7186 and I’m here pretty much all day today. Thanks, Christine From: Sophie Fontaine < Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 4:55 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Hello Christine, My name is Sophie Fontaine, and I am a student at Cal Poly enrolled in a News Reporting and Writing class. I am currently working on a story about Greek life in San Luis Obispo and how it affects the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly in terms of housing, noise, and community relations. I’m hoping to speak with you about this topic, so I can get someone from the city's perspective, to better understand how local officials and residents view the presence of fraternities and sororities in residential areas. My deadline for this article is Wednesday, June 11, at midnight. for my class. I am available for a phone call on Monday or Tuesday between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. Please let me know if you or someone else in your office might be available for a short interview. I believe it’s an important story that could help foster better understanding between students and long-term residents. You can reach me at ( or via email at Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear from you soon. Best, Sophie Fontaine 172 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 9:07 AM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:Mezzapesa, John Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I’m not available that evening. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 9:03 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The final re-review for a fraternity CUP, for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill Blvd. Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:57 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations What is being discussed at the 6/25 meeting? From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:51 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Thanks for the info and catching that typo! I’ll update in the report. Will you be able to attend the 6/25 PC meeting coming up? Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner 173 Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:49 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Report attached of NSPY calls for service from September 2024 to current. NV means “negative violation” or no violation. Your PD Actions paragraph indicates September 2025. That hasn’t happened yet. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi again you two, I have one more follow up question: do we have a record of all the complaints/calls received for 720 Foothill from September 2024 to now? (Not just those that resulted in a citation). Or is the list I have complete with those as well? I’ve included the language from the history of violations section of the staff report below. Let me know if any changes are needed. Police Department Actions Records indicate that the Police Department has issued five (5) citations for noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present). Of these five, one (1) citation, issued on February 7, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation was dismissed by Hearing Officer Alex Karlin based on a lack of plainly audible noise on the body camera footage of the issuing Officer at 50 feet from the property line. Code Enforcement Actions On January 29, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple noise violations and Use Permit violations (Attachment X – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 720 Foothill, dated 1-29-2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued two Administrative Citations (assessing fines in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit on February 14 and March 19, 2025 (Attachment X – Administrative Citations for 720 Foothill, dated 2-14-2025 and 3-19-2025). After issuing the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citations, staff coordinated with the property owner and current fraternity members over the next several months to discuss these issues, including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner 174 Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:43 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I checked the citation appeal files and citation #28152, issued on 2/7 at 9:10 PM, was dismissed. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I can’t actually. That information needs to come from the City Attorney’s office. Please reach out to Sarah Zion. From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:21 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I believe the first citation on 2/7 was dismissed on appeal. Christine can confirm. Prior to recommendation for use permit review, Code Enforcement also issued two citations for use permit violations as a result of the noise citations. John From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:59 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The citations listed below are all from noise, none for unruly gathering. No calls for service to the property since March. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:20 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi John and Christine, I’m working on finishing the draft staff report for the re-review of use permit U 36-09 for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill. 175 Can you please confirm the number and type of violations 720 Foothill has received in this current school year (Sept 24 – present)? Here is the information I received as of April 1. Please note, this didn’t differentiate between a noise or unruly gathering violation. PD info Date of Citation/DAC DAC or CIT Notes 9/18/24 12:14 AM CIT 12 people 1/23/25 11:19 PM CIT 14 people, no alcohol 2/7/25 9:10 PM CIT 15 people, alcohol present 2/7/25 10:31 PM CIT 20 people, alcohol present 2/27/25 10:08 PM CIT 65 people, alcohol present Code Enforcement info: A Notice of Violation was issued to owner and occupants on 1/29/2025 for use permit violations, citing conditions #9 & #12 of current use permit. I’ll draft the language for the history of violations once I hear back from you two, and I will send to you both the language for a final review. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 176 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 9:03 AM To:Wallace, Christine Cc:Mezzapesa, John Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The final re-review for a fraternity CUP, for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill Blvd. Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:57 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations What is being discussed at the 6/25 meeting? From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:51 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Thanks for the info and catching that typo! I’ll update in the report. Will you be able to attend the 6/25 PC meeting coming up? Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org 177 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:49 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Report attached of NSPY calls for service from September 2024 to current. NV means “negative violation” or no violation. Your PD Actions paragraph indicates September 2025. That hasn’t happened yet. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi again you two, I have one more follow up question: do we have a record of all the complaints/calls received for 720 Foothill from September 2024 to now? (Not just those that resulted in a citation). Or is the list I have complete with those as well? I’ve included the language from the history of violations section of the staff report below. Let me know if any changes are needed. Police Department Actions Records indicate that the Police Department has issued five (5) citations for noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present). Of these five, one (1) citation, issued on February 7, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation was dismissed by Hearing Officer Alex Karlin based on a lack of plainly audible noise on the body camera footage of the issuing Officer at 50 feet from the property line. Code Enforcement Actions On January 29, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple noise violations and Use Permit violations (Attachment X – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 720 Foothill, dated 1-29-2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued two Administrative Citations (assessing fines in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit on February 14 and March 19, 2025 (Attachment X – Administrative Citations for 720 Foothill, dated 2-14-2025 and 3-19-2025). After issuing the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citations, staff coordinated with the property owner and current fraternity members over the next several months to discuss these issues, including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 178 From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:43 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I checked the citation appeal files and citation #28152, issued on 2/7 at 9:10 PM, was dismissed. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I can’t actually. That information needs to come from the City Attorney’s office. Please reach out to Sarah Zion. From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:21 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I believe the first citation on 2/7 was dismissed on appeal. Christine can confirm. Prior to recommendation for use permit review, Code Enforcement also issued two citations for use permit violations as a result of the noise citations. John From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:59 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The citations listed below are all from noise, none for unruly gathering. No calls for service to the property since March. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:20 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi John and Christine, I’m working on finishing the draft staff report for the re-review of use permit U 36-09 for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill. Can you please confirm the number and type of violations 720 Foothill has received in this current school year (Sept 24 – present)? Here is the information I received as of April 1. Please note, this didn’t differentiate between a noise or unruly gathering violation. PD info Date of Citation/DAC DAC or CIT Notes 9/18/24 12:14 AM CIT 12 people 1/23/25 11:19 PM CIT 14 people, no alcohol 2/7/25 9:10 PM CIT 15 people, alcohol present 2/7/25 10:31 PM CIT 20 people, alcohol present 179 2/27/25 10:08 PM CIT 65 people, alcohol present Code Enforcement info: A Notice of Violation was issued to owner and occupants on 1/29/2025 for use permit violations, citing conditions #9 & #12 of current use permit. I’ll draft the language for the history of violations once I hear back from you two, and I will send to you both the language for a final review. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 180 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 8:57 AM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:Mezzapesa, John Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations What is being discussed at the 6/25 meeting? From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:51 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Thanks for the info and catching that typo! I’ll update in the report. Will you be able to attend the 6/25 PC meeting coming up? Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:49 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Report attached of NSPY calls for service from September 2024 to current. NV means “negative violation” or no violation. Your PD Actions paragraph indicates September 2025. That hasn’t happened yet. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi again you two, I have one more follow up question: do we have a record of all the complaints/calls received for 720 Foothill from September 2024 to now? (Not just those that resulted in a citation). Or is the list I have complete with those as well? 181 I’ve included the language from the history of violations section of the staff report below. Let me know if any changes are needed. Police Department Actions Records indicate that the Police Department has issued five (5) citations for noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present). Of these five, one (1) citation, issued on February 7, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation was dismissed by Hearing Officer Alex Karlin based on a lack of plainly audible noise on the body camera footage of the issuing Officer at 50 feet from the property line. Code Enforcement Actions On January 29, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple noise violations and Use Permit violations (Attachment X – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 720 Foothill, dated 1-29-2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued two Administrative Citations (assessing fines in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit on February 14 and March 19, 2025 (Attachment X – Administrative Citations for 720 Foothill, dated 2-14-2025 and 3-19-2025). After issuing the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citations, staff coordinated with the property owner and current fraternity members over the next several months to discuss these issues, including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:43 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I checked the citation appeal files and citation #28152, issued on 2/7 at 9:10 PM, was dismissed. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I can’t actually. That information needs to come from the City Attorney’s office. Please reach out to Sarah Zion. From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:21 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I believe the first citation on 2/7 was dismissed on appeal. Christine can confirm. 182 Prior to recommendation for use permit review, Code Enforcement also issued two citations for use permit violations as a result of the noise citations. John From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:59 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The citations listed below are all from noise, none for unruly gathering. No calls for service to the property since March. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:20 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi John and Christine, I’m working on finishing the draft staff report for the re-review of use permit U 36-09 for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill. Can you please confirm the number and type of violations 720 Foothill has received in this current school year (Sept 24 – present)? Here is the information I received as of April 1. Please note, this didn’t differentiate between a noise or unruly gathering violation. PD info Date of Citation/DAC DAC or CIT Notes 9/18/24 12:14 AM CIT 12 people 1/23/25 11:19 PM CIT 14 people, no alcohol 2/7/25 9:10 PM CIT 15 people, alcohol present 2/7/25 10:31 PM CIT 20 people, alcohol present 2/27/25 10:08 PM CIT 65 people, alcohol present Code Enforcement info: A Notice of Violation was issued to owner and occupants on 1/29/2025 for use permit violations, citing conditions #9 & #12 of current use permit. I’ll draft the language for the history of violations once I hear back from you two, and I will send to you both the language for a final review. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org 183 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 184 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 8:51 AM To:Wallace, Christine Cc:Mezzapesa, John Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Thanks for the info and catching that typo! I’ll update in the report. Will you be able to attend the 6/25 PC meeting coming up? Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:49 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Report attached of NSPY calls for service from September 2024 to current. NV means “negative violation” or no violation. Your PD Actions paragraph indicates September 2025. That hasn’t happened yet. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi again you two, I have one more follow up question: do we have a record of all the complaints/calls received for 720 Foothill from September 2024 to now? (Not just those that resulted in a citation). Or is the list I have complete with those as well? I’ve included the language from the history of violations section of the staff report below. Let me know if any changes are needed. Police Department Actions Records indicate that the Police Department has issued five (5) citations for noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present). Of these five, one (1) citation, issued on February 7, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation was dismissed by Hearing Officer Alex Karlin based on a lack of plainly audible noise on the body camera footage of the issuing Officer at 50 feet from the property line. 185 Code Enforcement Actions On January 29, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple noise violations and Use Permit violations (Attachment X – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 720 Foothill, dated 1-29-2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued two Administrative Citations (assessing fines in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit on February 14 and March 19, 2025 (Attachment X – Administrative Citations for 720 Foothill, dated 2-14-2025 and 3-19-2025). After issuing the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citations, staff coordinated with the property owner and current fraternity members over the next several months to discuss these issues, including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:43 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I checked the citation appeal files and citation #28152, issued on 2/7 at 9:10 PM, was dismissed. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I can’t actually. That information needs to come from the City Attorney’s office. Please reach out to Sarah Zion. From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:21 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I believe the first citation on 2/7 was dismissed on appeal. Christine can confirm. Prior to recommendation for use permit review, Code Enforcement also issued two citations for use permit violations as a result of the noise citations. John From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:59 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations 186 The citations listed below are all from noise, none for unruly gathering. No calls for service to the property since March. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:20 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi John and Christine, I’m working on finishing the draft staff report for the re-review of use permit U 36-09 for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill. Can you please confirm the number and type of violations 720 Foothill has received in this current school year (Sept 24 – present)? Here is the information I received as of April 1. Please note, this didn’t differentiate between a noise or unruly gathering violation. PD info Date of Citation/DAC DAC or CIT Notes 9/18/24 12:14 AM CIT 12 people 1/23/25 11:19 PM CIT 14 people, no alcohol 2/7/25 9:10 PM CIT 15 people, alcohol present 2/7/25 10:31 PM CIT 20 people, alcohol present 2/27/25 10:08 PM CIT 65 people, alcohol present Code Enforcement info: A Notice of Violation was issued to owner and occupants on 1/29/2025 for use permit violations, citing conditions #9 & #12 of current use permit. I’ll draft the language for the history of violations once I hear back from you two, and I will send to you both the language for a final review. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 187 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 8:49 AM To:Patino, Mallory; Mezzapesa, John Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Attachments:720FOOTHILL.pdf Report attached of NSPY calls for service from September 2024 to current. NV means “negative violation” or no violation. Your PD Actions paragraph indicates September 2025. That hasn’t happened yet. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi again you two, I have one more follow up question: do we have a record of all the complaints/calls received for 720 Foothill from September 2024 to now? (Not just those that resulted in a citation). Or is the list I have complete with those as well? I’ve included the language from the history of violations section of the staff report below. Let me know if any changes are needed. Police Department Actions Records indicate that the Police Department has issued five (5) citations for noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present). Of these five, one (1) citation, issued on February 7, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation was dismissed by Hearing Officer Alex Karlin based on a lack of plainly audible noise on the body camera footage of the issuing Officer at 50 feet from the property line. Code Enforcement Actions On January 29, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple noise violations and Use Permit violations (Attachment X – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 720 Foothill, dated 1-29-2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued two Administrative Citations (assessing fines in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit on February 14 and March 19, 2025 (Attachment X – Administrative Citations for 720 Foothill, dated 2-14-2025 and 3-19-2025). After issuing the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citations, staff coordinated with the property owner and current fraternity members over the next several months to discuss these issues, including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org 188 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:43 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I checked the citation appeal files and citation #28152, issued on 2/7 at 9:10 PM, was dismissed. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I can’t actually. That information needs to come from the City Attorney’s office. Please reach out to Sarah Zion. From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:21 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I believe the first citation on 2/7 was dismissed on appeal. Christine can confirm. Prior to recommendation for use permit review, Code Enforcement also issued two citations for use permit violations as a result of the noise citations. John From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:59 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The citations listed below are all from noise, none for unruly gathering. No calls for service to the property since March. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:20 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi John and Christine, I’m working on finishing the draft staff report for the re-review of use permit U 36-09 for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill. Can you please confirm the number and type of violations 720 Foothill has received in this current school year (Sept 24 – present)? Here is the information I received as of April 1. Please note, this didn’t differentiate between a noise or unruly gathering violation. PD info Date of Citation/DAC DAC or CIT Notes 9/18/24 12:14 AM CIT 12 people 1/23/25 11:19 PM CIT 14 people, no alcohol 189 2/7/25 9:10 PM CIT 15 people, alcohol present 2/7/25 10:31 PM CIT 20 people, alcohol present 2/27/25 10:08 PM CIT 65 people, alcohol present Code Enforcement info: A Notice of Violation was issued to owner and occupants on 1/29/2025 for use permit violations, citing conditions #9 & #12 of current use permit. I’ll draft the language for the history of violations once I hear back from you two, and I will send to you both the language for a final review. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 06/09/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 08:43 NSPY Clearance Data Page: 1 NSPY OFF/LOC/CLEARANCE: Incident address When reported Responsible off Cle Offe ------------------------- ------------------- --------------- --- ---- 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 07:16:39 03/15/2025 Ybarra, F NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 21:20:29 02/28/2025 Ayres, A NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:08:22 02/27/2025 Cordell, A CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:31:44 02/07/2025 Meggs, N CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 21:10:45 02/07/2025 Meggs, N CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 23:19:25 01/23/2025 Bracy, B CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 00:37:14 01/18/2025 Cordell, A NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:00:28 11/15/2024 Brewer, D NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 00:14:25 09/18/2024 Jessen, S CIT NSPY = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 190 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To:Cohen, Rachel Subject:USE-0334-2025 Delta Upsilon CUP re-review staff report ready for review Hi Rachel, The staff report for USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon (720 Foothill) CUP re-review is ready for your review. The files are linked below from my SharePoint. If you’d rather I route in eScribe, let me know and I’ll upload it there. Folder: USE-0334-2025 (720 Foothill) - Delta Upsilon Re-review Staff Report Word Doc: Staff Report USE-0334-2025 (720 Foothill) - Delta Upsilon Fraternity CUP Re-review.docx Attachment Folder: Attachments Draft Reso A, Modification Word Doc: A - Draft PC Resolution - Modification (USE-0334-2025).docx Draft Reso B, Revocation Word Doc: B - Draft PC Resolution - Revocation (USE-0334-2025).docx Let me know if you have any questions or what edits I should make. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 191 From:Marx, Jan Sent:Sunday, June 8, 2025 6:20 PM To:Sophie Fontaine Subject:RE: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods OK From: Sophie Fontaine < Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2025 6:17 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Yes, that works for me. Thank you! -Sophie On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:11 PM Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Sophie, How would a phone talk tomorrow Monday June 9 at 10 am work for you? Jan From: Sophie Fontaine < Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2025 1:07 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Subject: Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Hello Jan, My name is Sophie Fontaine, and I am a student at Cal Poly in a News Reporting and Writing class. I am currently working on a story about Greek life in San Luis Obispo and how it affects the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly in terms of housing, noise, and community relations. I’m hoping to speak with you about this topic, so I can get someone from the city's perspective, to better understand how local officials and residents view the presence of fraternities and sororities in residential areas. My deadline for this article is Wednesday, June 11, at midnight, for my class. I am available for a phone call on Monday or Tuesday between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. or I can try to meet in person if you have availability. 192 Please let me know if you or someone else in your office might be available for a short interview. I believe it’s an important story that could help foster better understanding between students and long-term residents. You can reach me at ( or via email at Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear from you soon. Best, Sophie Fontaine 193 From:Sophie Fontaine < Sent:Sunday, June 8, 2025 1:07 PM To:Marx, Jan Subject:Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Hello Jan, My name is Sophie Fontaine, and I am a student at Cal Poly in a News Reporting and Writing class. I am currently working on a story about Greek life in San Luis Obispo and how it affects the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly in terms of housing, noise, and community relations. I’m hoping to speak with you about this topic, so I can get someone from the city's perspective, to better understand how local officials and residents view the presence of fraternities and sororities in residential areas. My deadline for this article is Wednesday, June 11, at midnight, for my class. I am available for a phone call on Monday or Tuesday between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. or I can try to meet in person if you have availability. Please let me know if you or someone else in your office might be available for a short interview. I believe it’s an important story that could help foster better understanding between students and long-term residents. You can reach me at ( or via email at Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear from you soon. Best, Sophie Fontaine 194 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To:Cohen, Rachel Subject:USE-0334-2025 Delta Upsilon CUP re-review staff report ready for review Hi Rachel, The staff report for USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon (720 Foothill) CUP re-review is ready for your review. The files are linked below from my SharePoint. If you’d rather I route in eScribe, let me know and I’ll upload it there. Folder: USE-0334-2025 (720 Foothill) - Delta Upsilon Re-review Staff Report Word Doc: Staff Report USE-0334-2025 (720 Foothill) - Delta Upsilon Fraternity CUP Re-review.docx Attachment Folder: Attachments Draft Reso A, Modification Word Doc: A - Draft PC Resolution - Modification (USE-0334-2025).docx Draft Reso B, Revocation Word Doc: B - Draft PC Resolution - Revocation (USE-0334-2025).docx Let me know if you have any questions or what edits I should make. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 195 From:Sophie Fontaine < Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 4:55 PM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:Inquiry About Greek Life and Its Impact on Surrounding Neighborhoods Hello Christine, My name is Sophie Fontaine, and I am a student at Cal Poly enrolled in a News Reporting and Writing class. I am currently working on a story about Greek life in San Luis Obispo and how it affects the surrounding neighborhoods, particularly in terms of housing, noise, and community relations. I’m hoping to speak with you about this topic, so I can get someone from the city's perspective, to better understand how local officials and residents view the presence of fraternities and sororities in residential areas. My deadline for this article is Wednesday, June 11, at midnight. for my class. I am available for a phone call on Monday or Tuesday between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. Please let me know if you or someone else in your office might be available for a short interview. I believe it’s an important story that could help foster better understanding between students and long-term residents. You can reach me at ( or via email at Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear from you soon. Best, Sophie Fontaine 196 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 2:05 PM To:kathie walker Cc:Steven Walker; Brett Cross; Sandra Rowley; Carolyn Smith; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:RE: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Kathie, I discussed this with Rami and Timmi and we all agree with you. Even if the noise violation is dismissed, there is documentation that more than 48 people were on site for an event without prior approval as required by Condition #5 of their use permit. Since an NOV was sent in February, they would receive a citation from our office for a use permit violation, which would be their third strike regardless of the outcome of the noise violation. We will be moving forward with issuance of a citation and recommendation for review. Thank you for your support on this on. John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: kathie walker < Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 12:55 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Cc: Steven Walker < ; Brett Cross < ; Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < ; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Hi John, I do have a question. The citation says there were 200 people at the event. So even if the hearing officer finds it did not violate the noise ordinance, more than 48 people violates a condition of use, right? The number on the citation is given to SLOPD by the person receiving a citation, so if you review the citation, Officer Sisemore should have noted that. Are you only counting noise violations or are you also including violations of conditions? Thank you, Kathie 197 On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 12:47 PM Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kathie, I wanted to let you know your concerns were received and investigated. The citation that was issued on 5/31/25 has been appealed by the fraternity and is currently being processed by the Attorney’s Office. As conditioned by the CUP, we will have to wait until a decision is made on the appeal until we move forward with a formal recommendation for use permit review. I can confirm that, if the citation is upheld, the fraternity has violated the “three strike” rule for noise violations as conditioned in the CUP. Let me know if you have any questions. John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: kathie walker < Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12:48 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Steven Walker < ; Brett Cross < ; Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < Subject: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill 198 Hi Timmi and John, Lambda Chi Alpha had a huge party on Sunday, 5/31/2025. Several SLOPD officers responded, and a citation was issued for a party with 200 people. I did not call SLOPD about his party, but these "dayge" parties held by fraternities, featuring DJs, waterslides, and hundreds of people, have become increasingly common in our neighborhood in the past few years. Most are held in the backyards of illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood, and are extremely disruptive! This citation marks the fifth citation to the property this academic year and the THIRD citation since its Conditional Use Permit was approved on 10/15/2024. The SLOPD records are below: I believe the CUP includes a condition that the CUP will automatically be re-reviewed if the fraternity receives three violations of conditions within 12 months. The CUP also has a condition of a maximum of 48 people at any event or gathering at Lambda Chi Alpha's property, including 1264 Foothill and 1241, 1242, 1245, and 1251 Monte Vista. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity follow local laws, including the noise ordinance. 199 The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity not have any events with live entertainment, bands, or amplified sounds. The CUP also includes a condition that says failure to comply with any of the conditions or code requirements or conduct of the use to consitute a violation of [laws], OR to constitute a public nuisance, OR to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grouds for revocation of this permit. The citation on 10/18/2024 says there was a "large party and fireworks in the street" at 10 PM. This was only three days after the fraternity's CUP was approved by the City Council. The citation says there were 50 people at the party, which is self-reported by the person receiving the citation. Here, it was Thomas Symer, the fraternity president and the person who was at the hearing for approval of the CUP. The citation on 2/8/2025 was a live music event that was documented in a previous email I sent to you on 2/25/2025. That correspondence is attached to this email. The event violates several conditions of the CUP. The citation says there were 50 people at the event, which is self-reported by the fraternity. Still, it exceeds the maximum occupancy of any event or gathering, which is 48. It was also a live music event, as advertised on Lambda Chi Alpha's Instagram page. And it violated the City's noise ordinance. Therefore, the single event violated multiple conditions of the fraternity's CUP. The event on 5/31/2025 had at least 200 people, which is also a violation of several conditions of the CUP. As previously mentioned, it was also the third noise citation since Lambda Chi Alpha's approval of its CUP. 200 Please have this CUP re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. Our family values Cal Poly and enjoys the students in our community, but there is a looming problem with the ongoing lack of respect and accountability of many of Cal Poly's fraternities. We hope the City will hold these problem houses responsible and that Cal Poly will cooperate with finding a solution. Thank you for your continued work on solving this issue. -Kathie 201 From:Zion, Sarah Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 2:02 PM To:Holcomb, Kelly; Dietrick, Christine Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Follow-Up on Citation Appeal Attachments:20250529_Notice-Hearing_Bomberger 30189.pdf; 20250529_Notice-Hearing_Quattrocchi 41303.pdf Hello all, Attached are the hearing notices for ADM41303 and ADM 30189. They are set for 3:30 and 4:00 on 6/19 in Council Hearing. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Zion, Sarah Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 10:12 AM To: Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Follow-Up on Citation Appeal The appeal hearings are currently set for June 19th, 2025. I haven’t yet drafted the hearing notice or fully put together the admin record, but I can provide a copy once this has been done. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II 202 City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2025 11:59 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Follow-Up on Citation Appeal The first appeal referenced needed to be amended so the dates received are actually: 5/1/25 for ADM 41303 5/5/25 for ADM 30189 The admin records have been requested for both, but these appeals have not been set for a specific hearing date. We were planning for mid- to late June (which would align with a gap between Cal Poly end of term and the appellants’ stated departure for summer break). If other factors need to be considered for scheduling, please let Sarah know and she can coordinate with the assigned hearing officer. Kelly Holcomb Senior Legal Analyst E kholcomb@slocity.org T 805.781.7060 From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2025 11:26 AM To: Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Follow-Up on Citation Appeal 203 Thx, C. Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Tommy Martin <cpbeta.riskmanagement@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2025 11:22 AM To: City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org> Subject: Follow-Up on Citation Appeal Hello, I'm following up on two administration citation appeal forms that were submitted on April 30th and May 5th. Both were for noise citations for the address: 1327 Foothill Blvd. Any update would be greatly appreciated, since myself and the residents will be gone for the summer, hoping to have a hearing at the city's earliest convenience. Thank you, -- 204 Tommy Martin Vice President of Risk Management Beta Theta Pi Fraternity Epsilon Delta Chapter at California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) San Luis Obispo, California, United States Cell: + 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, California 93405-1413 cpbeta.riskmanagement@gmail.com City of San Luis Obispo, City Atto rney’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3249, 805.78 1.7140, slocity.org Notice of In-Person Hearing Page 1 May 29, 2025 Brandon Bomberger 1327 E. Foothill Blvd. San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Via First Class Mail and Email to: Re: Notice of In-Person Hearing Administrative Citation #ADM 30189 To Brandon Bomberger: On May 3, 2025, the City of San Luis Obispo received your appeal of the administrative citation referenced above. 1. Hearing Date, Time, and Place. Your hearing on the appeal has been set for: June 19, 2025, at 4:00 PM Council Hearing, San Luis Obispo City Hall 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 The hearing may be continued to a different date for good cause, but not to accommodate an academic schedule. Such a request to continue, and the reasons you feel constitute good cause, must be submitted in writing and received by the hearing officer or the director of the department that issued the citation within 5 days of the date of this notice. 2. Hearing Officer or Board. The hearing officer assigned to your appeal is Alex Karlin. 3. Failure to Appear or Submit Evidence. Should you fail to appear at your hearing or, at least 10 days prior to the hearing, submit written evidence to the hearing officer and to the director of the department that issued the citation, your appeal may be considered abandoned. Abandonment of the appeal is a failure to exhaust administrative remedies making your citation fine due and payable immediately. An in-person hearing is your right but not a requirement. Upon receiving this Notice of In-Person Hearing, should you determine you are unable to attend the hearing as scheduled, immediately notify the hearing officer and your appeal can instead be reviewed on the record. Notice of In-Person Hearing Page 2 4. Addresses for Communication, Notices, or Requests. Any communications, notices, or requests to the hearing officer shall be addressed as follows: Hearing Officer Alex Karlin c/o City Attorney’s Office 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Email: city_attorney@slocity.org Any communications, notices, or requests to the director of the department that issued the citation shall be addressed as follows: Chief Rick Scott c/o Christine Wallace 1042 Walnut Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Additional information regarding the appeal process may be found in Chapter 1.24 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code which is posted at: https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/. If the City has included in the administrative record video or audio recordings related to the citation being appealed, those may be reviewed in their entirety by contacting the staff member listed below and scheduling a time to review the recordings in-person. No copies will be provided and no remote viewing will be facilitated. Any request to review the recordings must be received at least two (2) business days in advance of your hearing date. If you have a disability and need a reasonable accommodation to participate in the hearing, please contact, in writing, the director of the department that issued the citation as soon as possible. The appeal hearing will be conducted in English. You are welcome to bring an interpreter if needed. Please call (805)781-7140 or write to city_attorney@slocity.org should you have any questions. Sincerely, Sarah Zion Legal Assistant City Attorney’s Office Enc: Administrative Record 1 2 4 5 6 Name and Capacity: Phone: Email address: 7 Office Use Only _St_a_f_f _in_i_ti_a_l _fo_r_ collection of fee _____ Date rec Address: PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS STARTING ON PAGE 2 BEFORE COMPLETING Date of Citation: 4/26/2025 ADM or Other Cite Number: 30189 Municipal Code Section(s) Cited: 9.12.050A Municipal Code Section(s) Appealed: 9.12.050A Address of Citation: Appellant Name(s): Brandon Bomberger Appellant Phone(s): (503) 437-3134 Appellant email address( : 25tommym@gmail.com If applicable Business Name: Appellant Cited As: Mark only one _____ Individual or Business Appellant Mailing Address(es): Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Appeal Fee. (calculate using worksheet on back): $ ___106_____ Administrative Citation Appeal Form Form must be received by the City Clerk within 10 days of date of citation to be considered timely filed. If no appeal is filed within ten days, the administrative citation shall be deemed final. SLMC§1.24.100(A). 3 8 9 10 11 Election of Appeal Process. Choose One. Election is final. _____ Construction Board of Appeals _____ Administrative Review Board ___x__ Hearing Officer Business License # _____ Owner of property or building __x___ Tenant being held financially responsible for landlord citation Reason for appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary. Appeal Fee to be collected when form is submitted. Failure to pay the appropriate fee may cause your appeal to be rejected. In-person Hearing. I wish to have my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to attend an in-person hearing. I understand I may submit evidence in support of my appeal up to ten (10) days in advance of the day of review and that I will receive written notice of when that day of review will be. Confirm decision to decline in-person hearing by initialing here: _______ If different that the address listed in #2 above, all future notices from the City relating to this appeal should be mailed to the following Official Mailing Address: Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true, and that this appeal form was executed on: ________________________________ Signature of Appellant or Representative __05/01/2025__ Date of Signature ______San Luis Obispo_____, California Place of Signature Representative. If applicable, Legal counsel or agent of Appellant Revised and Published: 10/1/2024 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 See attached. LW 05-03-2025 Brandon Bomberger 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 04/26/2025 Subject: Appeal of Noise Violation at 1327 E Foothill Blvd Dear Hearing Officer, I am writing to appeal the noise violation issued to our residence at 1327 E Foothill Blvd on April 26th, 2025. At the time the citation was issued, approximately 3:42 PM, there was minimal sound detectable beyond our property line. We were hosting a small gathering for Parents Weekend, a tradition in which members of our organization invite their families to visit and spend time together. Unfortunately, word of the event spread more widely than we had intended, resulting in additional guests arriving with their families. We regret any disturbance caused to our neighbors and made every effort to hold the event in the early afternoon to minimize impact from increased vocal noise. The gathering remained controlled and respectful, and upon receiving the citation, we promptly asked our guests to leave. We believe that a review of the responding officers’ body-cam footage will reflect our cooperation and respect throughout the interaction. The officers also mentioned that most of the noise appeared to be coming from the back side of our property. We explained that we own two separate properties with different addresses, which are divided by a creek running through the middle. Based on this, we believe that if any excessive noise is determined to violate the noise ordinance, it should be attributed to the address from which the noise was actually heard, 35 Hathway Ave, rather than our Foothill Blvd address. We recognize that this is not an ideal situation, especially as we are currently contesting a previous noise citation. Given the circumstances, we respectfully request reconsideration of this citation and look forward to presenting our case at an in-person appeal hearing. Please let us know if any additional information is needed. Sincerely, Brandon Bomberger Residents of 1327 E Foothill Blvd 05/20/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 1001 11:25 Law Incident Addr. History Report, by Date Reported Page: 1 Inc. No. Reported Nature Address Loctn Dsp --------- ----------------- --------------- -------------------------- ----- --- 240420053 17:19:37 04/20/24 Noise Party 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240525047 14:18:12 05/25/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240525050 14:58:23 05/25/24 NOISE 2ND RESP 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240525059 16:33:37 05/25/24 NOISE 2ND RESP 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240530096 22:05:28 05/30/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240608094 22:00:21 06/08/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240608098 22:09:31 06/08/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 CAN 241217102 20:44:34 12/17/24 Assist Req 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250111094 22:06:06 01/11/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250116119 22:38:14 01/16/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250207109 22:48:03 02/07/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250213096 22:54:56 02/13/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250222046 15:04:32 02/22/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250223066 17:50:53 02/23/25 Parking Problem 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250311068 17:22:20 03/11/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250419058 15:59:05 04/19/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250426038 15:16:44 04/26/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250508102 23:38:14 05/08/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Incidents for This Report: 18 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Report Includes: All dates greater than `00:00:00 01/01/24` All location codes All cities All addresses matching `1327 Foothill*` All agencies All offenses observed All offenses reported All offense codes All nature of incidents All circumstance codes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** End of Report /tmp/rpt60TaXk-rplwiahr.r1_4 *** PROOF OF SERVICE - 1 - PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO I am employed in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California. I am over the age of 18, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401. On May 29, 2025, I caused the foregoing document described as NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL HEARING to be served on the interested parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes, addressed as follows: Brandon Bomberger 1327 E. Foothill Blvd. San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Email: [X] By United States Mail: I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope addressed as indicated above. I am readily familiar with the office’s practice of collection and processing documents for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of service. [X] Courtesy Copy by E-mail: I caused this document to be transmitted via e-mail to the e- mail address listed above. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 29, 2025, at San Luis Obispo, California. _____________________________ Sarah Zion City of San Luis Obispo, City Attorney’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3249, 805.781.7140, slocity.org Notice of In-Person Hearing Page 1 May 29, 2025 Zach Quattrocchi 1327 E. Foothill Blvd. San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Via First Class Mail and Email to: Re: Notice of In-Person Hearing Administrative Citation #ADM 41303 To Zach Quattrocchi: On May 1, 2025, the City of San Luis Obispo received your appeal of the administrative citation referenced above. 1. Hearing Date, Time, and Place. Your hearing on the appeal has been set for: June 19, 2025, at 3:30 PM Council Hearing, San Luis Obispo City Hall 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 The hearing may be continued to a different date for good cause, but not to accommodate an academic schedule. Such a request to continue, and the reasons you feel constitute good cause, must be submitted in writing and received by the hearing officer or the director of the department that issued the citation within 5 days of the date of this notice. 2. Hearing Officer or Board. The hearing officer assigned to your appeal is Alex Karlin. 3. Failure to Appear or Submit Evidence. Should you fail to appear at your hearing or, at least 10 days prior to the hearing, submit written evidence to the hearing officer and to the director of the department that issued the citation, your appeal may be considered abandoned. Abandonment of the appeal is a failure to exhaust administrative remedies making your citation fine due and payable immediately. An in-person hearing is your right but not a requirement. Upon receiving this Notice of In-Person Hearing, should you determine you are unable to attend the hearing as scheduled, immediately notify the hearing officer and your appeal can instead be reviewed on the record. Notice of In-Person Hearing Page 2 4. Addresses for Communication, Notices, or Requests. Any communications, notices, or requests to the hearing officer shall be addressed as follows: Hearing Officer Alex Karlin c/o City Attorney’s Office 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Email: city_attorney@slocity.org Any communications, notices, or requests to the director of the department that issued the citation shall be addressed as follows: Chief Rick Scott c/o Christine Wallace 1042 Walnut Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Additional information regarding the appeal process may be found in Chapter 1.24 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code which is posted at: https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/. If the City has included in the administrative record video or audio recordings related to the citation being appealed, those may be reviewed in their entirety by contacting the staff member listed below and scheduling a time to review the recordings in-person. No copies will be provided and no remote viewing will be facilitated. Any request to review the recordings must be received at least two (2) business days in advance of your hearing date. If you have a disability and need a reasonable accommodation to participate in the hearing, please contact, in writing, the director of the department that issued the citation as soon as possible. The appeal hearing will be conducted in English. You are welcome to bring an interpreter if needed. Please call (805)781-7140 or write to city_attorney@slocity.org should you have any questions. Sincerely, Sarah Zion Legal Assistant City Attorney’s Office Enc: Administrative Record San Luis Obispo Police Department ADMINISTRATIVEMI CITATIIOON ADM 41303 Q A•a.( z, 7 rr_ AM. m 'firi- ': FOJ (u ee y rLC 7 Dr P apter 1.2 / a San Lois Obispo Municipal Codo,you are horeby ordorod to immediately coos°the activity below.You aro further ordered not to ropoal or continuo this activity. Safety Enhancement Fines are subject to Increase. Penalties for violations within twolve(12) months: SLMC Vbb lket(s) Doaa .loI Erew eat 0.142, 9.12.0.50A/3 Noise Disturbance 0 9.20.050 Urinating in Public 0 9,04 010 - Open Comainor 0 0 1st violation=$350 2nd violation=$700 3rd violation=$1,000 9.13.030A Unruly Gathering-Host 0 1st violation=$700 Multiple violations=$1,000 9.13.030B Unruly Gathering•Contributor 1st violation=$350 2nd violation=$700 3rd violation=$1,000 8.16.030 Smoking Whore Prohibited N/A 8.16.040 . Smoking In Outdoor Parke.Open Sp•Transit N/A let violation=$100 2nd violation=$200 3rd violation=$500 If police are required to return within 24 hours to a parry,gathering or assemblage that Is o threat to the public peace,health,salary or gonoral welfare,Iho response shall bo considered a'special security service'and the person receiving this citation that bo charged for the cost of the police response.(SLOMC Ch.9,21) Location of Violation (s) of People Alc 3a7 nittt 30 R skyrtsCNoet O e— V NAME OF ARRESTING OFFICER IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE EMP NO, The Cdy will mall an invoke to ea tl4®shown m your Matan,vldkatvq the required Ise.II you m not receive such reatt yw am mai moved to cony ft.thirty(30)cabala:Gaya m the votaUoo data Ferns Waal be mid by check or rvmy order made payable to do Gay a San Lads Canpn.Unpaid I es may be atrgact to on nasceornord ere eon procawm. 22. emsSc,+You me Caetb ominim meet'pY ermilm a minim to me E Cay Cleft mean tat Ito der of the vidatian oats. 1s. Q a See the reveres&Ms to more Information. Initial Halo w An Invoice for this citation will be malted CO you and can be paid online by Halting 0 betas//adcla'.tell,._erdel_net/nllnw / ouesuona?Call Finance a(aids)781.1124 CA) For volaaon a tonnatan corm me San L is Obispo Poace Department M(905)181.1188 1042 Walnut Street,San tad Obispo.CA 93401 Rev.ea a2.f9.25) r. r Cite ADM 41303 Details: On 04/19/2025 at around 1609 hours, I was dispatched to 1327 Foothill regarding a noise complaint. I arrived and stopped several houses away and could hear loud music and yelling coming from the backyard. I pulled forward to the front of the home and met with a resident identified as Zachary Quattrocchi. I informed him of the violation and issued him an administrative citation for the noise violation. SWARTZ/98539 san Luis owispo police Oepantment T .\O,minlstRatly€ citation o:i Citation # ADM41303 Name: ZACHARY BOICE QUATTROCCHI Date of Birth: PRIOR VIOLATIONS None Prior Multiple 350 700 1000 EllNoiseViolation SLMC9.12. lam' SLMC 9.12.050B050B Urinating in Public SLMC 9.20.050111 0 111 Dangerous& Deadly SLMC 9.16.020Eli 0Weapon Open Container SLMC 9.04.010 El NA (Criminal) NA (Criminal) Social Host SLMC 9.05.010 Unruly Gathering,SLMC 9.13.030BEl 111 0 None Prior 700 1000 Unruly Gathering SLMC 9.I3.030A None Prior Multiple 100 200 500 ID Smoking SLMC 8.16.030 O OSLMC8.16.040 C:\Users'ecscrada\Dalcop\ADMIN CiTI rORM.doc• 10/31/2023 2:57:00 PM Zach Quattrocchi 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 04/19/2025 Subject: Appeal of Noise Violation at 1327 E Foothill Blvd Dear Hearing Officer, I am writing to appeal the noise violation issued to our residence at 1327 E Foothill Blvd on April 19th, 2025. At the time the citation was issued, approximately 4:00 PM, there was minimal sound detectable beyond our property line. While a few residents had friends in the front yard, we were making a conscious effort to adhere to Cal Poly and City of San Luis Obispo rules and ordinances. We believe the citation was issued unnecessarily, as there was no excessive noise audible from the street or the surrounding area. We respectfully request that officer bodycam footage be reviewed, as it will likely provide context to the situation and demonstrate our cooperative attitude and intent to comply with city regulations. We take noise ordinances seriously and are committed to maintaining compliance. We are actively working toward obtaining our Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and have taken steps to ensure our residence remains in good standing with the city. We understand the responsibility involved in hosting guests and consistently prioritize safety and health precautions. Given the circumstances, we respectfully request that this citation be reconsidered and look forward to an in-person appeal hearing. Please let us know if further information is required. Sincerely, Zach Quattrocchi Residents of 1327 E Foothill Blvd 1 2 4 5 6 Name and Capacity: Phone: Email address: Address: PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS STARTING ON PAGE 2 BEFORE COMPLETING Date of Citation: 4/19/2025 ADM or Other Cite Number: 41303 Municipal Code Section(s) Cited: 9.12.050 Municipal Code Section(s) Appealed: 9.12.050 Address of Citation: Appellant Name(s): Zach Quattrocchi Appellant Phone(s): + : 25tommym@gmail.com Appellant Mailing Address(es): Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Form must be received by the City Clerk within 10 days of date of citation to be considered timely filed. If no appeal is filed within ten days, the administrative citation shall be deemed final. SLMC§1.24.100(A). 3 8 9 10 11 If applicable Business Name: Appellant Cited As: Mark only one _____ Individual or Business Business License # _____ Owner of property or building ___x__ Tenant being held financially responsible for landlord citation Reason for appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary. Election of Appeal Process. Choose One. Election is final. _____ Construction Board of Appeals _____ Administrative Review Board ___x__ Hearing Officer 7 Appeal Fee. (calculate using worksheet on back): $87.50 _____________ Appeal Fee to be collected when form is submitted. Failure to pay the appropriate fee may cause your appeal to be rejected. Office Use Only Staff initial for collection of fee _____ Date received____________ In-person Hearing. I wish to have my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to attend an in-person hearing. I understand I may submit evidence in support of my appeal up to ten (10) days in advance of the day of review and that I will receive written notice of when that day of review will be. Confirm decision to decline in-person hearing by initialing here: _______ If different that the address listed in #2 above, all future notices from the City relating to this appeal should be mailed to the following Official Mailing Address: Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true, and that this appeal form was executed on: ________________________________ Signature of Appellant or Representative ___4/29/2025___ ____ Date of Signature ______San Luis Obispo_____, California Place of Signature Representative. If applicable, Legal counsel or agent of Appellant Revised and Published: 10/1/2024 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 See attached. City of San Luis Obispo, City Attorney’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3249, 805.781.7140, slocity.org April 30, 2025 Zach Quattrocchi 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Via: First Class Mail and Email to: Re: Request to Appeal Administrative Citation #41303 Dear Zach Quattrocchi: On April 29, 2025, the City of San Luis Obispo received your request to appeal the above referenced Administrative Citation. This request was incomplete and is therefore rejected. The reason(s) for this rejection include, but are not necessarily limited to: You have not provided a reason for the appeal and not paid the appropriate appeal fee. To calculate the appeal fee, please use the worksheet on the appeal form and the citation amount referenced below. Based on the information you provided, the fine for the citation referenced above is: $700. In July 2024, the City Council adopted an updated fee schedule which went into effect October 1, 2024. The updated fee schedule includes a fee to appeal an administrative citation to a Hearing Officer. The Administrative Citation Appeal Form was updated to reflect this, and a blank copy of the updated form is being enclosed with this notice. If you choose to do so, within ten (10) days of the date of this letter, the City Clerk’s Office must receive a written appeal that complies with the requirements of Chapter 1.24 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, which governs administrative citations and appeals (specifically, Section 1.24.100(C) Contents of Appeal), and the current City Fee Schedule. If no compliant request to appeal is timely received, this appeal will be deemed abandoned and payment of the related fines will be due. The Municipal Code is available on the City’s website, www.slocity.org or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office. For your convenience, a form has been enclosed to capture the necessary information. If you have any questions, please contact me at (805) 781-7140 or city_attorney@slocity.org. Sincerely, Leanne Williams Legal Assistant, City of San Luis Obispo Enclosures: 1. Copy of received Appeal Form 2. Blank Appeal Form 1 2 4 5 6 Name and Capacity: Phone: Email address: Address: PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS STARTING ON PAGE 2 BEFORE COMPLETING Date of Citation: 4/19/2025 ADM or Other Cite Number: 41303 Municipal Code Section(s) Cited: 9.12.050 Municipal Code Section(s) Appealed: 9.12.050 Address of Citation: Appellant Name(s): Zach Quattrocchi Appellant Phone(s): +1 (714) 862-8626 Appellant email address(es): 25tommym@gmail.com Appellant Mailing Address(es): Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Form must be received by the City Clerk within 10 days of date of citation to be considered timely filed. If no appeal is filed within ten days, the administrative citation shall be deemed final. SLMC§1.24.100(A). 3 8 9 10 11 If applicable Business Name: Appellant Cited As: Mark only one _____ Individual or Business Business License # _____ Owner of property or building ___x__ Tenant being held financially responsible for landlord citation Reason for appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary. Election of Appeal Process. Choose One. Election is final. _____ Construction Board of Appeals _____ Administrative Review Board ___x__ Hearing Officer 7 Appeal Fee. (calculate using worksheet on back): $87.50 _____________ Appeal Fee to be collected when form is submitted. Failure to pay the appropriate fee may cause your appeal to be rejected. Office Use Only Staff initial for collection of fee _____ Date received____________ In-person Hearing. I wish to have my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to attend an in-person hearing. I understand I may submit evidence in support of my appeal up to ten (10) days in advance of the day of review and that I will receive written notice of when that day of review will be. Confirm decision to decline in-person hearing by initialing here: _______ If different that the address listed in #2 above, all future notices from the City relating to this appeal should be mailed to the following Official Mailing Address: Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true, and that this appeal form was executed on: ________________________________ Signature of Appellant or Representative ___4/29/2025___ ____ Date of Signature ______San Luis Obispo_____, California Place of Signature Representative. If applicable, Legal counsel or agent of Appellant Revised and Published: 10/1/2024 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 See attached. Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Form must be received by the City Clerk within 10 days of date of citation to be considered timely filed. If no appeal is filed within ten days, the administrative citation shall be deemed final. SLMC§1.24.100(A). Revised and Published: 10/1/2024 PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS STARTING ON PAGE 2 BEFORE COMPLETING Address of Citation: 1 Date of Citation: ADM or Other Cite Number: Municipal Code Section(s) Cited: Municipal Code Section(s) Appealed: 2 Appellant Name(s): Appellant Mailing Address(es): Appellant Phone(s): Appellant email address(es): 3 If applicable Business Name: Business License # 4 Appellant Cited As: Mark only one _____ Individual or Business _____ Owner of property or building _____ Tenant being held financially responsible for landlord citation 5 Reason for appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary. 6 Election of Appeal Process. Choose One. Election is final. 7 Appeal Fee. (calculate using worksheet on back): $ _____________ _____ Construction Board of Appeals Appeal Fee to be collected when form is submitted. Failure to pay the appropriate fee may cause your appeal to be rejected. _____ Administrative Review Board _____ Hearing Officer Office Use Only Staff initial for collection of fee _____ Date received ____________ 8 In-person Hearing. I wish to have my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to attend an in-person hearing. I understand I may submit evidence in support of my appeal up to ten (10) days in advance of the day of review and that I will receive written notice of when that day of review will be. Confirm decision to decline in-person hearing by initialing here: _______ 9 If different that the address listed in #2 above, all future notices from the City relating to this appeal should be mailed to the following Official Mailing Address: 10 Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true, and that this appeal form was executed on: ________________________________ ______________ ______________________________, California Signature of Appellant or Representative Date of Signature Place of Signature 11 Representative. If applicable, Legal counsel or agent of Appellant Name and Capacity: Address: Phone: Email address: Page 2 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Instructions Questions about this form or the appeal process should be directed to the City Attorney’s Office Email: City_Attorney@slocity.org, Phone: (805)781-7140 1. Citation Details: Describe the administrative citation received (that you are appealing) with as much detail as possible. The specific information required by the Municipal Code is listed in the form, but any identifying information you provide will assist staff to quickly complete the initial intake processing of your request to appeal. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(3)(a-b). 2. Appellant Details: Whether cited as an individual, business owner, property/building owner, or are being held financially responsible as a tenant for a citation issued to your landlord, all contact information you wish to provide to the City should be entered here. If there is more than one appellant, attach additional pages and provide the contact information for every appellant. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(1). 3. Citation Issued to a Business: For an appeal of a citation issued directly to a business (e.g. failure to timely renew a business license), please provide the additional information in part 3 of this form. The Business Name and License number should be on the renewal notice, administrative citation, or other notifications. 4. Interest in Citation: For an administrative citation issued to an individual, only that specific person may submit an appeal. Any appeal submitted by a roommate, family member, etc., on behalf of the individual cited, will be rejected. For appeals issued to a property or building, the owner or their agent may submit an appeal, as well as any tenant who is being held contractually, financially responsible for the property citation. Any legal representative or other agent of the appellant should provide their own contact details in part 11 of this form. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(2). 5. Reason for Appeal: Give a brief statement of why you are appealing, the relief or action sought, and why the administrative citation should be revoked, modified or otherwise set aside. The AMOUNT of the fine cannot be reduced on appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary, and include any audio, video, photographic, or other supporting evidence you wish to provide. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(3)(c). 6. Election of Appeal Process: Only one appeal process may be chosen, and once chosen, the election is final. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(c). All citations that include a violation of Title 15 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (building and related codes), even if other non-Title 15 code violations are also cited, must be appealed to the Construction Board of Appeals. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(1). For citations that do not include a violation of Title 15, you must make a choice between: • Administrative Review Board: If you wish to retain your right to challenge the administrative citation, or any final city action related to the citation, in court by any writ action, you must appeal to the Administrative Review Board for a more formal, comprehensive hearing to ensure preparation of an adequate administrative record. Should you wish to then challenge that board’s decision in court, you will need to file a petition for writ with the Superior Court, which may require the services of an attorney to prepare, and will require payment of the City’s costs to prepare the administrative record. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(b). • Hearing Officer: An expedited, less formal appeal process to a city hearing officer, whose final decision may be appealed directly to the superior court for de novo review pursuant to California Government Code Section 53069.4. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(a). For citations that do not include a violation of Title 15, failure to request a hearing before the Administrative Review Board within the time for the filing of an appeal will result in the appeal being assigned to a Hearing Officer and will constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies for purposes of any subsequently filed writ action. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(4). Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Page 3 7. Appeal Fee. Every path of appeal requires payment of a fee due at the time your appeal is submitted. Once your appeal is determined to be complete, timely and valid, the fee is non-refundable as it is recovery of a percentage of the cost to bring your appeal to hearing, regardless of the outcome. Fees are adopted by City Council resolution and updated annually. Use the chart below to properly calculate your appeal fee: Construction Board of Appeals, Title 15 violations Minor: related to an Alteration/Addition of an existing Single-Family or Accessory Dwelling Unit (including duplexes), a demolition permit, or any item permitted under the “Additional Building Fees” schedule $618 Moderate: related to all other permits that are processed under the alteration/addition work class, New Single-Family permits (including duplexes), and New Accessory Dwelling Unit permits $1,106 Major: related to anything that doesn’t fall into one of the other two categories $1,953 Administrative Review Board $501 Hearing Officer review, capped at $106 but could be less depending on the amount of your fine Amount of fine(s) being appealed: (1) 25% of fine(s): amount in (1) multiplied by 0.25 (2) Cost Recovery Appeal Fee Cap: (3) $106 Your appeal fee: whichever is less of (2) & (3) $ Checks should be made out to the “City of San Luis Obispo.” Payment by credit card can be facilitated by the Finance Department 1 and should be completed prior to submission of your appeal form, with a copy of the payment receipt attached to the form. Any appeal received without payment of the proper fee may be rejected. 8. Hearing Procedure: It is your right under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24, no matter which appeal process is chosen, to have an in-person hearing. However, you are under no obligation to appear. If you choose, you may elect to have your appeal reviewed on the record (all documents, pictures, etc. submitted by yourself or the City).San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.110(F). 9. Official Mailing Address: The Municipal Code requires certain notices be sent via U.S. Mail and so, while courtesy notifications may be sent via email or to other addresses, you are required to provide one official mailing address for your appeal. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.100(C)(5). 10. Signature: The step most commonly missed in the appeal process (and the most common reason for rejection of a timely appeal) is failure to sign the appeal and declare the facts stated in the appeal to be true. The form provides a signature block for this purpose but if there are multiple appellants, all must sign a declaration. Any additional declarations can be attached as additional pages. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.100(C)(5). 11. Representative of Appellant: Any legal representative or other agent assisting with the preparation of the appeal or who intends to appear at the hearing, must provide their contact information and relationship to the appellant. 1 Finance Department staff are available by phone (805)781-7124 and at the public counter, downstairs at City Hall (990 Palm Street), Monday – Thursday, 8:00am – 4:00pm 1 2 4 5 6 Name and Capacity: Phone: Email address: Address: PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS STARTING ON PAGE 2 BEFORE COMPLETING Date of Citation: 4/19/2025 ADM or Other Cite Number: 41303 Municipal Code Section(s) Cited: 9.12.050 Municipal Code Section(s) Appealed: 9.12.050 Address of Citation: Appellant Name(s): Zach Quattrocchi Appellant Phone(s): + Appellant email address(es): Appellant Mailing Address(es): Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Form must be received by the City Clerk within 10 days of date of citation to be considered timely filed. If no appeal is filed within ten days, the administrative citation shall be deemed final. SLMC§1.24.100(A). 3 8 9 10 11 If applicable Business Name: Appellant Cited As: Mark only one _____ Individual or Business Business License # _____ Owner of property or building ___x__ Tenant being held financially responsible for landlord citation Reason for appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary. Election of Appeal Process. Choose One. Election is final. _____ Construction Board of Appeals _____ Administrative Review Board ___x__ Hearing Officer 7 Appeal Fee. (calculate using worksheet on back): $87.50 _____________ Appeal Fee to be collected when form is submitted. Failure to pay the appropriate fee may cause your appeal to be rejected. Office Use Only Staff initial for collection of fee _____ Date received____________ In-person Hearing. I wish to have my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to attend an in-person hearing. I understand I may submit evidence in support of my appeal up to ten (10) days in advance of the day of review and that I will receive written notice of when that day of review will be. Confirm decision to decline in-person hearing by initialing here: _______ If different that the address listed in #2 above, all future notices from the City relating to this appeal should be mailed to the following Official Mailing Address: Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true, and that this appeal form was executed on: ________________________________ Signature of Appellant or Representative ___4/29/2025___ ____ Date of Signature ______San Luis Obispo_____, California Place of Signature Representative. If applicable, Legal counsel or agent of Appellant Revised and Published: 10/1/2024 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 See attached. LW 05-01-2025 Zach Quattrocchi 1327 E Foothill Blvd San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 04/19/2025 Subject: Appeal of Noise Violation at 1327 E Foothill Blvd Dear Hearing Officer, I am writing to appeal the noise violation issued to our residence at 1327 E Foothill Blvd on April 19th, 2025. At the time the citation was issued, approximately 4:00 PM, there was minimal sound detectable beyond our property line. While a few residents had friends in the front yard, we were making a conscious effort to adhere to Cal Poly and City of San Luis Obispo rules and ordinances. We believe the citation was issued unnecessarily, as there was no excessive noise audible from the street or the surrounding area. We respectfully request that officer bodycam footage be reviewed, as it will likely provide context to the situation and demonstrate our cooperative attitude and intent to comply with city regulations. We take noise ordinances seriously and are committed to maintaining compliance. We are actively working toward obtaining our Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and have taken steps to ensure our residence remains in good standing with the city. We understand the responsibility involved in hosting guests and consistently prioritize safety and health precautions. Given the circumstances, we respectfully request that this citation be reconsidered and look forward to an in-person appeal hearing. Please let us know if further information is required. Sincerely, Zach Quattrocchi Residents of 1327 E Foothill Blvd 05/20/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 1001 11:25 Law Incident Addr. History Report, by Date Reported Page: 1 Inc. No. Reported Nature Address Loctn Dsp --------- ----------------- --------------- -------------------------- ----- --- 240420053 17:19:37 04/20/24 Noise Party 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240525047 14:18:12 05/25/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240525050 14:58:23 05/25/24 NOISE 2ND RESP 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240525059 16:33:37 05/25/24 NOISE 2ND RESP 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240530096 22:05:28 05/30/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240608094 22:00:21 06/08/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 240608098 22:09:31 06/08/24 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 CAN 241217102 20:44:34 12/17/24 Assist Req 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250111094 22:06:06 01/11/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250116119 22:38:14 01/16/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250207109 22:48:03 02/07/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250213096 22:54:56 02/13/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250222046 15:04:32 02/22/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250223066 17:50:53 02/23/25 Parking Problem 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250311068 17:22:20 03/11/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250419058 15:59:05 04/19/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250426038 15:16:44 04/26/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR 250508102 23:38:14 05/08/25 NOISE POLICE 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PN2 NR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Incidents for This Report: 18 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Report Includes: All dates greater than `00:00:00 01/01/24` All location codes All cities All addresses matching `1327 Foothill*` All agencies All offenses observed All offenses reported All offense codes All nature of incidents All circumstance codes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** End of Report /tmp/rpt60TaXk-rplwiahr.r1_4 *** PROOF OF SERVICE - 1 - PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO I am employed in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California. I am over the age of 18, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401. On May 29, 2025, I caused the foregoing document described as NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL HEARING to be served on the interested parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes, addressed as follows: Zach Quattrocchi 1327 E. Foothill Blvd. San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Email: [X] By United States Mail: I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope addressed as indicated above. I am readily familiar with the office’s practice of collection and processing documents for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of service. [X] Courtesy Copy by E-mail: I caused this document to be transmitted via e-mail to the e- mail address listed above. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 29, 2025, at San Luis Obispo, California. _____________________________ Sarah Zion 205 From:kathie walker < Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 12:55 PM To:Mezzapesa, John Cc:Steven Walker; Brett Cross; Sandra Rowley; Carolyn Smith; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:Re: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Hi John, I do have a question. The citation says there were 200 people at the event. So even if the hearing officer finds it did not violate the noise ordinance, more than 48 people violates a condition of use, right? The number on the citation is given to SLOPD by the person receiving a citation, so if you review the citation, Officer Sisemore should have noted that. Are you only counting noise violations or are you also including violations of conditions? Thank you, Kathie On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 12:47 PM Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Kathie, I wanted to let you know your concerns were received and investigated. The citation that was issued on 5/31/25 has been appealed by the fraternity and is currently being processed by the Attorney’s Office. As conditioned by the CUP, we will have to wait until a decision is made on the appeal until we move forward with a formal recommendation for use permit review. I can confirm that, if the citation is upheld, the fraternity has violated the “three strike” rule for noise violations as conditioned in the CUP. Let me know if you have any questions. John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 206 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: kathie walker < Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12:48 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Steven Walker < ; Brett Cross < ; Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < Subject: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Hi Timmi and John, Lambda Chi Alpha had a huge party on Sunday, 5/31/2025. Several SLOPD officers responded, and a citation was issued for a party with 200 people. I did not call SLOPD about his party, but these "dayge" parties held by fraternities, featuring DJs, waterslides, and hundreds of people, have become increasingly common in our neighborhood in the past few years. Most are held in the backyards of illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood, and are extremely disruptive! This citation marks the fifth citation to the property this academic year and the THIRD citation since its Conditional Use Permit was approved on 10/15/2024. The SLOPD records are below: 207 I believe the CUP includes a condition that the CUP will automatically be re-reviewed if the fraternity receives three violations of conditions within 12 months. The CUP also has a condition of a maximum of 48 people at any event or gathering at Lambda Chi Alpha's property, including 1264 Foothill and 1241, 1242, 1245, and 1251 Monte Vista. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity follow local laws, including the noise ordinance. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity not have any events with live entertainment, bands, or amplified sounds. The CUP also includes a condition that says failure to comply with any of the conditions or code requirements or conduct of the use to consitute a violation of [laws], OR to constitute a public nuisance, OR to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grouds for revocation of this permit. The citation on 10/18/2024 says there was a "large party and fireworks in the street" at 10 PM. This was only three days after the fraternity's CUP was approved by the City Council. The citation says there were 50 people at the party, which is self-reported by the person receiving the citation. Here, it was Thomas Symer, the fraternity president and the person who was at the hearing for approval of the CUP. The citation on 2/8/2025 was a live music event that was documented in a previous email I sent to you on 2/25/2025. That correspondence is attached to this email. The event violates several conditions of the CUP. 208 The citation says there were 50 people at the event, which is self-reported by the fraternity. Still, it exceeds the maximum occupancy of any event or gathering, which is 48. It was also a live music event, as advertised on Lambda Chi Alpha's Instagram page. And it violated the City's noise ordinance. Therefore, the single event violated multiple conditions of the fraternity's CUP. The event on 5/31/2025 had at least 200 people, which is also a violation of several conditions of the CUP. As previously mentioned, it was also the third noise citation since Lambda Chi Alpha's approval of its CUP. Please have this CUP re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. Our family values Cal Poly and enjoys the students in our community, but there is a looming problem with the ongoing lack of respect and accountability of many of Cal Poly's fraternities. We hope the City will hold these problem houses responsible and that Cal Poly will cooperate with finding a solution. Thank you for your continued work on solving this issue. -Kathie 209 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 12:47 PM To:kathie walker Cc:Steven Walker; Brett Cross; Sandra Rowley; Carolyn Smith; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:RE: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Hi Kathie, I wanted to let you know your concerns were received and investigated. The citation that was issued on 5/31/25 has been appealed by the fraternity and is currently being processed by the Attorney’s Office. As conditioned by the CUP, we will have to wait until a decision is made on the appeal until we move forward with a formal recommendation for use permit review. I can confirm that, if the citation is upheld, the fraternity has violated the “three strike” rule for noise violations as conditioned in the CUP. Let me know if you have any questions. John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: kathie walker < Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12:48 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Steven Walker < ; Brett Cross < ; Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < Subject: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Hi Timmi and John, Lambda Chi Alpha had a huge party on Sunday, 5/31/2025. Several SLOPD officers responded, and a citation was issued for a party with 200 people. 210 I did not call SLOPD about his party, but these "dayge" parties held by fraternities, featuring DJs, waterslides, and hundreds of people, have become increasingly common in our neighborhood in the past few years. Most are held in the backyards of illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood, and are extremely disruptive! This citation marks the fifth citation to the property this academic year and the THIRD citation since its Conditional Use Permit was approved on 10/15/2024. The SLOPD records are below: I believe the CUP includes a condition that the CUP will automatically be re-reviewed if the fraternity receives three violations of conditions within 12 months. The CUP also has a condition of a maximum of 48 people at any event or gathering at Lambda Chi Alpha's property, including 1264 Foothill and 1241, 1242, 1245, and 1251 Monte Vista. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity follow local laws, including the noise ordinance. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity not have any events with live entertainment, bands, or amplified sounds. The CUP also includes a condition that says failure to comply with any of the conditions or code requirements or conduct of the use to consitute a violation of [laws], OR to constitute a public nuisance, OR to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grouds for revocation of this permit. The citation on 10/18/2024 says there was a "large party and fireworks in the street" at 10 PM. This was only three days after the fraternity's CUP was approved by the City Council. The citation says there were 50 people at the party, which is self-reported by the person receiving the citation. Here, it was Thomas Symer, the fraternity president and the person who was at the hearing for approval of the CUP. The citation on 2/8/2025 was a live music event that was documented in a previous email I sent to you on 2/25/2025. That correspondence is attached to this email. The event violates several conditions of the CUP. The 211 citation says there were 50 people at the event, which is self-reported by the fraternity. Still, it exceeds the maximum occupancy of any event or gathering, which is 48. It was also a live music event, as advertised on Lambda Chi Alpha's Instagram page. And it violated the City's noise ordinance. Therefore, the single event violated multiple conditions of the fraternity's CUP. The event on 5/31/2025 had at least 200 people, which is also a violation of several conditions of the CUP. As previously mentioned, it was also the third noise citation since Lambda Chi Alpha's approval of its CUP. Please have this CUP re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. Our family values Cal Poly and enjoys the students in our community, but there is a looming problem with the ongoing lack of respect and accountability of many of Cal Poly's fraternities. We hope the City will hold these problem houses responsible and that Cal Poly will cooperate with finding a solution. Thank you for your continued work on solving this issue. -Kathie 214 From:angie kasprzak < Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 10:06 AM To:Vethavanam, Samantha Cc:Pennon, Matt Subject:06-25-2025 Mayor/Advisory Body Chairs Quarterly Meeting Attachments:02-27-2025 Mayor-Advisory Body Chair Quarterly Meeting Packet.pdf Samantha, Just a reminder about meeting coming up, I'm sure you got one too. I attached last meeting's agenda in case Matt wanted to see what it looked like. Matt - usually Sam would write up and send to both of us to see if there is anything we would like to add or delete. But not sure she'll have time with her vacation. Thank you, Angie Mayor’s Quarterly Advisory Body Meeting Thursday, February 27, 2025 ~ 12:00 PM – 1:30 PM Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street Lunch will be provided AGENDA 1. Call to Order (Mayor Erica A. Stewart) 2. Presentation – Major City Goals – City Manager Whitney McDonald 3. Advisory Body Quarterly Reports (All) 4. Adjournment Next Meeting: Thursday, May 22, 2025 1 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT Active Transportation Committee DATE: February 27, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Garrett Otto, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Dave Amos, Lea Brooks, Jill Caggiano, Francine Levin, Russell Mills, Kimmie Nguyen (Vice Chair), Garrett Otto (Chair) REGULAR MEETING DATE & TIME: Third Thursdays of odd months at 6:00 pm STAFF LIAISON: Adam Fukushima, Active Transportation Manager COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council Members Michelle Shoresman and Mike Boswell MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST QUARTERS (NOV ’24 - FEB ‘25): The ATC met for meetings on November 21, 2024 and December 12, 2024, and January 16, 2025.  Provided input on the 2025 paving project, including a road diet and buffered bike lanes with flex post on Tank Farm between Broad and Righetti Road.  ATC Budget Recommendation for FY ’25-‘27.  Review and provided comments on the initial draft of the Vision Zero Action Plan.  600 Tank Farm Project update including removal of roundabout from project scope. UPCOMING PROJECTS (MARCH-MAY 2025): The ATC’s next regular meetings are scheduled for March 20, 2025 and May 15, 2025:  ATP Tier 1 implementation project priorities and project updates  Update and Preliminary Concepts for the Broad Complete Streets Project CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT Architectural Review Commission (ARC) DATE: February 10, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Brian Pineda (Chair) ON BEHALF OF: Commissioners Kelley Abbas, Michael Clark, Robert Arens, John Carrion, Charles Gerencser, and Ashley Mayou (Vice Chair) REGULAR MTG. DATE TIME: 1st and 3rd Monday of each month, 5:00 PM STAFF LIAISON: Rachel Cohen, Principal Planner COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council members Emily Francis and Andy Pease MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST QUARTER (OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2024): ● Review of the proposal to construct 20 low-to very-low income affordable homes with a request for a concession pursuant to CA State Density Bonus Law for a reduction of parking requirements; rehabilitation of the Master List Historic Rosa Butrón Adobe including demolition of portions of the building at the rear of the structure; and removal of 11 trees with a compensatory planting plan at 466 Dana Street (ARCH-0329-2022). ● Review of ARC Goals for the City’s 2025-2027 financial plan / budget process. ● Review of three single family homes located in Enclave at Righetti (Lots 23, 24, & 34), including requests for rear setback reductions and exceptions to height limits for wall, fences and hedges (ARCH-0457-2024). CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT Human Relations Commission DATE: February 25, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Angie Kasprzak, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Angie Kasprzak (Chair), Catuih Campos (Vice Chair), Mason Ambrosio Stephanie Carlotti, Vincent DeTurris, Sierra Smith, Taryn Warrecker. REGULAR MTG. DATE TIME: First Wednesday of every month at 5:00 p.m. STAFF LIAISON: Samantha Vethavanam COUNCIL LIAISONS: Mayor Erica A. Stewart and Vice Mayor Shoresman MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST QUARTER (OCTOBER - DECEMBER):  In October, the HRC reviewed the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Human Servies Grant year-end reports and held a public hearing on their preliminary FY 2024-25 DEI High Impact Grant funding recommendations. After the hearing they made their final funding recommendations for City Council. A total of eleven (11) organizations were recommended for funding.  In November, the HRC held a public hearing on the FY 2025-26 Community Development Block Grant funding recommendations and approved what was presented.  In December, the HRC received an update to the Chong’s Homemade Candy Sign Restoration and Interpretive Panel project and designated their FY 2025-27 Financial Goals, which include: o Increase funding allocation to grant programs o Funds to establish resources to address hate crime and incidents o HRC community outreach and engagement o Address CVRA needs through outreach and engagement o Expand investment in training  In December, the HRC also completed and approved the selection of members of the 2025-26 Human Services Grant Review Subcommittee, which opened on January 20, 2025, and will close on February 28, 2025. MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS FROM THIS QUARTER (JANUARY-FEBRUARY):  In February, the HRC completed and approved the selection of Commissioner Liaison roles for the FY 2024-25 DEI High Impact Grant Recipients, received updates about staffing changes within the Office of DEI, and reviewed the remainder of their FY 2024-25 workplan. UPCOMING PROJECTS (MARCH-JULY):  The HRC will receive an update from the Fire Department on their internship program and an update from the Ad Hoc Learning Subcommittee on the Hate Incident Reporting process.  The HRC will also review the end of year reports for the FY 2023-24 DEI High Impact grants and the mid-year reports for the FY 2024-25 Human Services Grant.  The HRC will hear updates on the DEI Strategic Plan, the Climate Action Plan, the Economic Development Strategic Plan, and the Homelessness Strategic Plan. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT Mass Transportation Committee DATE: February 25, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: David Figueroa, Chair ON BEHALF OF: The City of SLO MTC members REGULAR MTG. DATE TIME: Bi-monthly, 2nd Wednesday at 2:30pm STAFF LIAISON: Alex Fuchs, Mobility Services Business Manager COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council Member Michael Boswell & Mayor Erica A. Stewart MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST PERIOD (NOVEMBER-FEBRUARY):  City Council Study Session – Short-Range Transit Plan, February 25, 2025 o Provide feedback on the draft plan and direct staff to make any necessary changes and return on April 15, 2025 with a final plan for adoption.  Ridership updates for 2024 and any stats from early 2025 o Ridership between October and December 2024 increased 13% when compared to the same period last year. o Ridership increased by 29% in January 2025 when compared to ridership numbers from January 2024. Staff is reconfirming numbers to ensure the increase is accurate.  Update on the 6X service (Cal Poly student Farmers Market service) o This is the first year that the 6X is running during Cal Poly’s Winter and Spring quarters. So far, average ridership is 268 between January and February 2025.  Downtown Access Pass program update: o 45 applications were submitted and approved between November and January.  City Council support for meeting agenda and formatting (thanks Erica!).  2 regular committee meetings: November and January  1 special meeting in December to focus on committee recommended budget priorities for the next two years. o The Committee recommended focusing on all High Impact Ridership recommendations of the Transit Innovation Study with the exception of Microtransit (which may be a focus of future budget cycles). The Committee also recommended focusing on expanding the Downtown Access program, and bus stop improvements.  Interviews conducted (& recommendations to proceed) for 2 vacant committee positions. UPCOMING PROJECTS (MARCH-JUNE):  Expect final version of the Short-Range Transit Plan ready for adoption at the April 15, 2025 meeting.  New committee members expected to be sworn in at the May meeting.  Regular meetings scheduled for March and May. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION DATE: February 27, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Robert Spector, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Robert Spector (Chair), Kari Howell (Vice Chair), Rick Blair, Kari Dupperon, Yukie Murphy, Adam Stowe, and Toni Kincaid. REGULAR MTG. DATE/TIME: First Wednesday of every month at 5:30 pm STAFF LIAISON: Greg Avakian, Parks and Recreation Director COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council Members Michelle Shoresman and Emily Francis MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST QUARTER:  Department Programming:  Youth Services: Programs continue at the five elementary school sites with over 800 children being served. With the District (SLCUSD) conducting a variety of campus facility construction projects, staff have had to move classrooms several times over the past six months (including setting up within multi-purpose rooms and sharing spaces). Staff have also been in direct contact with District regarding there pending budget impacts and how Parks & Recreation programs will continue to support the TK, Before and After School programs. Staff planning for upcoming spring break and summer programming.  Youth Sports: Youth Basketball League (in partnership with the SLO YMCA) started the winter season with 70 teams (~ 700 registrations). Program concludes in March.  The SLO Swim Center conducted a winter swim incentive campaign with discounted swim and exercise passes, as well as Swim BINGO. The current winter programming of lap swim, water exercise, and swim classes, as well as the return of the monthly series of Learn Swim Grow on the 4th Tuesday of the month are in full swing over the past couple of months.  Laguna Lake Golf Course: Fall programs continue to be successful in both attendance and revenue from October – December 2024 rounds 4,894 (2023=3,990) and revenue: $71,240 (2023= $59,780). Programming included hosting the County Cross County Track race in November, as well as the Laguna Middle School PE courses, Cal Poly Kinesiology courses (2 sessions during fall), the SLO High School golf program, First Tee Youth clinics, and Special Olympics (Mondays). The Pro Shop and creek bridge replacement projects are still in design process.  Events: The annual October Boo Bash was held October 25 with over 600 kiddos and families attending the haunted house and movie. New for this year, the haunted house incorporated different time offerings that ranged from low impact sensory (lights on, less scary) to higher level ‘scare thermometer’ for older children. This was well received and appreciated by a variety of family and kids.  Public Art:  The Utility Art Box program Fall campaign was hosted in October for 10 replacement locations within the downtown area. These boxes were part of the original campaign back in 2010 and included a celebration of the deaccessioned art and artists with the new art and artists at the Ludwick Community Center on December 6.  The Garden Street Alley project, in partnership with SLOMA, was completed the first week of February by Artist Rachel B. Hayes and included an artist dinner (meet & greet) hosted by Hotel Cerro.  The mural for the final phase of the Chorro Underpass project began in November with the installation by Marmalade Design. The project is scheduled to be completed in March.  Ranger Service:  Progress continued with fuel management and assisting City Biologist with areas for tree and brush removal in the Lizzie/Bowden Ranch areas  Two new wooden bridges were reconstructed within the Irish Hills Natural Reserve to accommodate both hikers and bikers  Over 100 trees have been planted in conjunction with the City’s 10,000 tree campaign within Open Space properties (Cerro San Luis, Johnson Ranch, Righetti Hill)  Ranger Service held a successful recruitment for a vacant (recent retirement) of a full- time Ranger staff member in November. PROJECT UPDATES:  Laguna Lake Dog Park: The project is on schedule with a March completion: all ADA pathways and flatwork completed, fencing installed, and finalizing the landscaping installation, as well as parking lot improvements in February. Once the landscaping is completed, the property is required to remain closed a minimum of 60 days for maturation process. Anticipated opening could occur at beginning of May and staff are currently planning a Grand Opening celebration to occur on a Friday afternoon or Saturday morning once a timeline is secured.  Laguna Lake Bike Park pilot project:  Ranger staff completed Phase 2 at the end of fall with the much-anticipated Jump Lines (intermediate to advanced level). The Advanced Jump Line route will be completed in spring. Next phase is to build out the adult/advance pump track. complete.  Emerson Park Prop 68 Grant: Due to forecasted project and construction costs, staff are reassessing the scope of the project to better fit within the Prop 68 Grant award of $2.81M. Staff have been working with the State Parks representative to identify rescoping of amenity CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT Personnel Board DATE: February 25, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Calvin Stevens, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Vice Chair Jill LeMieux and Board Members Linda Mielke, Patricia Ponce, and Sharon Seitz. REGULAR MTG. DATE TIME: The Personnel Board met on December 4, 2024. There are no future meetings scheduled. STAFF LIAISON: Nickole Domini, Director of Human Resources COUNCIL LIAISONS: Mayor Erica A. Stewart, Council Member Jan Marx MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST QUARTER:  The Personnel Board met in December 2024 to finalize the proposed Personnel Board advisory body goals for Council consideration as part of the 2025-2027 Financial Planning Process.  Continued in its ‘stand-by’ status as an appeals and grievance forum for City employees.  No grievances or appeals subject to review by the Board were filed during the past quarter. UPCOMING PROJECTS:  The Personnel Board meets once annually as required by law, but only as needed thereafter. There are no upcoming issues at this time. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: February 14, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Justin Cooley, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Justin Cooley (Chair), David Houghton (Vice Chair), Juan Munoz-Morris, Steve Kahn, Robert Jorgensen, Eric Tolle and Sheryl Flores. REGULAR MTG. DATE/TIME: Second and fourth Wednesday of every month at 6:00 p.m. STAFF LIAISON: Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council Members Jan Marx and Michelle Shoresman MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS (NOVEMBER 2024 - FEBRUARY 2025):  Re-review and modification of a conditional use permit for an existing fraternity use located at 280 California.  Review and approval of the Waterman Village project that includes 20 low and very-low income affordable housing units and rehabilitation of a historic adobe located at 466 Dana Street.  Review and approval of a Director’s Action permit to allow CAPSLO to establish and operate a rotating overnight safe parking pilot program at five locations throughout the City that provides individuals experiencing homelessness a safe place to temporarily park a vehicle overnight to facilitate the transition to permanent housing.  Review and recommendation to the City Council of various amendments to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning Regulations) of the City’s Municipal Code regarding accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, urban lot splits, and clarifications to regulations for affordable housing projects for consistency with state law. UPCOMING PROJECTS (FEBRUARY 2025 – MARCH 2025):  Review and recommendation to the City Council of various amendments to the Airport Area Specific Plan to allow mixed-use residential development in the Service Commercial (C-S) and Manufacturing (M) zones subject to a Conditional Use Permit where appropriate and consistent with the County Airport Land Use Plan. Planning Commission Report Continued…  Review and recommendation to the City Council of a modification to a previously approved mixed-use development located at 600 Tank Farm Road, including a proposed modification to circulation improvements to install an unsignalized intersection at Tank Farm/Santa Fe (West) Intersection with stop control on the Santa Fe (West) as an interim access improvement in-lieu of the previously required Tank Farm/Santa Fe roundabout. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Q2 REPORT PROMOTIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE DATE: February 27, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Teressa Purington, City Clerk FROM: Samantha Welch, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Chair Samantha Welch, John Thomas, Robin Wolf, Maureen Forsberg, Anni Wang and Lydia Bates REGULAR MTG. DATE/TIME: Second Wednesday of every month at 5:30 pm STAFF LIAISONS: Jacqui Clark-Charlesworth, Tourism & Community Promotions Manager and Laura Fiedler, Economic Development & Tourism Manager COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council Members Michelle Shoresman and Mike Boswell MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST THREE MONTHS: • Onboarded the City’s new Economic Development & Tourism Manager, Laura Fiedler. • Finalized the PCC’s goal setting as part of Council’s 2025-27 process. • Concluded the second annual ARTober, a celebration of Arts & Humanities Month that included an awareness campaign including partnerships with KSBY and Adam Montiel’s Up + Adam podcast as well as the return of Piano in the Plaza. • Completed the fifth year of Buy Local Bonus, with gift cards from 165 businesses, 4,637 qualified shopper entries, and a local fiscal impact of more than $ 868,597. • Finalized the Cultural Arts and Community Promotions (CACP) grant program for FY25- 26, the second year back to an annual process. • Reimagined Eat Local Bonus and SLO Restaurant Week into SLO Restaurant Month, a monthlong incentive for diners to visit San Luis Obispo eateries. UPCOMING PROJECTS: • Awarding the recipients for the PCC’s $100,000 CACP grant funding. • Establish the 2025-26 SLO PCC budget including contract commitments. • Receiving the recommendation report from consultant Whereabout on the neighborhood identity study. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT REVENUE ENHANCEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION DATE: February 27, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Anthony Bozzano, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Commissioners Tony Skapinsky, Jim Hamari, Renne Gardner, and Kenny McCarthy REGULAR MTG. DATE/TIME: 4-5 times per year based on need STAFF LIAISONS: Riley Kuhn, Principal Budget Analyst COUNCIL LIAISONS: Vice Mayor Shoresman MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST QUARTER: 1. The REOC met on December 5, 2024 and took the following actions: a. Elected Anthony Bozzano as Chair and Tony Skapinsky as Vice Chair b. Appointed Renne Gardner and Kenny McCarthy to serve on a subcommittee to assist with the development of the FY 2023-24 Annual Community Report c. Prepared for the 2024-25 Annual Citizens Oversight Meeting and Community Forum, which was successfully held on January 23, 2025 UPCOMING ISSUES: 1. The Commission will develop the FY 2023-24 Annual Community Report 2. The Commission will review preliminary recommendations for use of Local Revenue Measure funds as part of the 2025-27 Financial Plan CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Q2 REPORT TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DATE: February 27, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Whitney McDonald, City Manager Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Lydia Bates, Chair ON BEHALF OF: Chair Lydia Bates, Vice Chair Clint Pearce, Lori Keller, Prashant Patel, Winston Newland and Nipool Patel REGULAR MTG. DATE/TIME: Second Wednesday of every month at 10:00 a.m. STAFF LIAISONS: Jacqui Clark-Charlesworth, Tourism & Community Promotions Manager & Laura Fiedler, Economic Development & Tourism Manager COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council Members Emily Francis and Michelle Shoresman MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING PAST THREE MONTHS: • Onboarded the City’s new Economic Development & Tourism Manager, Laura Fiedler. • Provided sponsorship for the 2025 San Luis Obispo International Film Festival as part of Visit San Luis Obispo’s events strategy. • Committed to attending U.S. Travel’s IPW, the world’s leading inbound travel trade show, in Chicago through a co-op with Visit SLO CAL. • Committed to a co-op with Visit SLO CAL for economic impact and lodging forecast data through Tourism Economics. • Finalized TBID’s goal setting as part of Council’s 2025-27 process. • Connected with hundreds of families and visitors through Cal Poly’s Mustang Family Weekend and the Spartan Race in early November. • Began planning for a spring launch of the “SLO Life Coach”, the next evolution of Visit San Luis Obispo’s brand campaign. • Participated in an all-hands strategic planning session with Board, staff and contractors to update the TBID’s 2025-2030 Strategic Plan. UPCOMING PROJECTS: • Reimagining the MidWeekend into an evergreen campaign, Visit San Luis Obispo’s shoulder season promotion. • Hosting the biannual Partner Reception for TBID constituents and partners at Quality Suites on February 26. • Establishing the 2025-26 SLO TBID budget including contract commitments and partnerships. upgrades that would still qualify and meet the grant requirements. Current design and engineering cost estimates are anticipated to be above $6.5 million. Appropriated budget is $3 million. Staff anticipate a revised design in late spring to be brought back to PRC for review.  Righetti Ranch Parks: The Community Park is the first priority and has been proposed within the upcoming 25-27 Financial Plan to initiate RFP for construction of Phase 1 of the community park which includes: lower parking lot, playground, restrooms, fields, seating/shade area, walking paths, security and pathway lighting. Pickleball courts may be included as an Add Alt for Phase 1, pending financial quotes from construction RFP. 218 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:31 PM To:Bob Jorgensen Subject:RE: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Hi Bob, Sorry to hear about the hip replacement surgery and hoping you have a fast recovery. I have heard from Chair Houghton that he has also been contacted as well and would bet that all PC members have been contacted. Chair Houghton declined to meet with Mr. Zuckermandel. Here is the email I sent to Houghton earlier today on this matter: “You are free to meet as you are with any applicant of a project on an agenda. If you choose to meet you will need to disclose this at the PC meeting on the 11th prior to taking action on the resolution language to revoke the Conditional use Permits. Just to be clear, the PC revoked the Conditional Use Permits for both fraternities at the 5/28 meeting and the CUPs are not up for discussion on the 11th, only the specific language of the revocation resolutions. Staff has also been contacted by Mr. Zuckermandel and we will be reaching out prior to the meeting to answer any questions.” Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bob Jorgensen < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:13 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community FYI, I just received this conversation request. Are other PC members being solicited as well? How would you suggest I handle it? 219 p .s. I had hip replacement surgery Tuesday and I’m not mobile right now. Actually not quite sure if I’m up for attending the June 11 Commission meeting. Sent from my iPhone Bob Jorgensen Begin forwarded message: From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Date: June 5, 2025 at 12:13:31 PM PDT To: Subject: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Good evening Commissioner Jorgenson My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you for service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members, particular about having their expectations met with conditional use permits. . Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city and would appreciate the opportunity to discuss how we can move forward to remain within the fold of being a good partner with the community. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel 220 From:Bob Jorgensen < Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:13 PM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community FYI, I just received this conversation request. Are other PC members being solicited as well? How would you suggest I handle it? p .s. I had hip replacement surgery Tuesday and I’m not mobile right now. Actually not quite sure if I’m up for attending the June 11 Commission meeting. Sent from my iPhone Bob Jorgensen Begin forwarded message: From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Date: June 5, 2025 at 12:13:31 PM PDT To: Subject: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Good evening Commissioner Jorgenson My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you for service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members, particular about having their expectations met with conditional use permits. . Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city and would appreciate the opportunity to 221 discuss how we can move forward to remain within the fold of being a good partner with the community. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel 222 From:Juan Fernandez < Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:10 PM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs; Terry Reeves Subject:Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill That would be perfect- thanks! Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 14:08, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, We prefer to use our City Teams meetings. I can send you the link shortly. Would you like me to invite everyone who is on this email thread? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan 223 On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am-1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, 224 I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE- 0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx ?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HU h_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png 225 ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE- 0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.a spx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk 226 o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx ?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?i d=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( 227 From:Juan Fernandez < Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs; Terry Reeves Subject:Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am- 1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez <jjfernan@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? 228 /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE-0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=26297&dbi d=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HUh_66DQiJAKQ pp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> 229 Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE-0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=201304&d bid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=202053&d bid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=194681 &dbid=0&repo=CityClerk 230 o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=195337&d bid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=200405 &dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=200865&d bid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=200395&dbi d=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006. png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( 231 From:Juan Fernandez < Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs; Terry Reeves Subject:Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE-0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. 232 b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=City Clerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HUh_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE-0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit 233 o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=C ityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=Ci tyClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo =CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=C ityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=200405&dbid=0&repo =CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=Ci tyClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=200395&dbid=0&repo=City Clerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield 234 ( 235 From:Jakob Zuckermandel < Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:22 PM To:David J. Houghton Cc: Corey, Tyler Subject:Re: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Attachments:PastedGraphic-6.tiff Thank you Chair Houghton for your attention. I appreciate your preference and will respect it. I currently have a final scheduled during the next commission meeting so i don’t think it is likely that I will be able to make. Therefore, I figured reaching out to affirm our commitment to the community may be timely, since the action before the commission was already made last week and is now past. With your preference, we’ll find some other time to connect to determine how we can partner on benefiting the community by way of forum or other conversations. Thank you, and wish you the best as you prepare for grading finals yourself. Jakob Zuckermandel On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 1:08 PM David J. Houghton < wrote: Mr. Zuckermandel, I appreciate your reaching out to me, but I would prefer to have any such discussions in the public forum of a PC meeting. Thank you, David Houghton On Jun 5, 2025, at 1:57 AM, Jakob Zuckermandel < wrote: Good evening Chair Houghton, My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you again for your service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members. I also appreciate your concerns about ensuring the institutional memory of the organization needs to work to make sure fraternities remain good neighbors year after year. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to 236 the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel ____________________ ____________________ David Houghton, PE Adjunct Faculty, Cal Poly SLO 237 From:David J. Houghton < Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:08 PM To:Jakob Zuckermandel Cc: Corey, Tyler Subject:Re: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Attachments:PastedGraphic-6.tiff Mr. Zuckermandel, I appreciate your reaching out to me, but I would prefer to have any such discussions in the public forum of a PC meeting. Thank you, David Houghton On Jun 5, 2025, at 1:57 AM, Jakob Zuckermandel < wrote: Good evening Chair Houghton, My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you again for your service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members. I also appreciate your concerns about ensuring the institutional memory of the organization needs to work to make sure fraternities remain good neighbors year after year. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is 238 Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel ____________________ ____________________ David Houghton, PE Adjunct Faculty, Cal Poly SLO 239 From:Matthew < Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:08 PM To:Zion, Sarah Subject:Re: Appeal Hearing Timeline Thank you for the clarification. On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 9:21 AM Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Matthew, Once a valid, complete appeal has been received, our office has 60 days to set a hearing. If the appeal was submitted today, it would be set for early August. Only the hearing officer can grant a continuance, so any request would need to be made to the hearing officer. Additionally, if you choose to not have an in-person hearing, any evidence may be submitted to add to the administrative record. Additional evidence can be submitted at any point in the process until the hearing date. Please let me know if you have additional questions. Thank you, Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 240 The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Matthew < Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025 12:11 PM To: Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Appeal Hearing Timeline Sarah Zion, Christine Wallace sent me your contact information. I'm the Risk Manager for a Cal Poly fraternity, and we recently received a ticket at our main house that we plan to appeal. Based on past experience, we know this process can be lengthy and will likely extend into summer break, which begins on June 16. Our entire Executive Board, including myself, will be out of SLO for the summer and likely unable to attend an appeal hearing if it's scheduled between June and September. While I know our attendance is not mandatory for the appeal, I feel that our presence gives us the best chance for success. I was wondering if the city might be flexible with the timeline and consider postponing the hearing until school resumes in September. If not, what would you suggest we do? Thank you in advance for your help. Best, Matthew Gnos 241 From:Armas, Sara Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:04 AM To:Wooten, Eric Subject:RE: PRR25328 Dittenber Sharepoint folder Attachments:RE: PRR24328 Dittenber Fraternities Production I thought we were closing it on 3/7/25 if we received no response? I have it reflected in our log as closed on 3/7, but I can update that if you want to keep it technically still open From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:51 AM To: Armas, Sara <SArmas@slocity.org> Subject: RE: PRR25328 Dittenber Sharepoint folder Yup – we don’t need it anymore. However, the PRR is still open – just all the info is now in Laserfiche. From: Armas, Sara <SArmas@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:26 AM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Subject: PRR25328 Dittenber Sharepoint folder Hello sir! I was going to delete this folder in Sharepoint as this request is closed/all these files have been reviewed and it doesn’t seem like we’ve received follow up. Just wanted to run it by you before I do! Sara Armas pronouns she/her/hers Deputy City Clerk I City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E SArmas@slocity.org T 805.781.7110 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Friday, March 7, 2025 10:50 AM To:Armas, Sara; Wooten, Eric Cc:Mezzapesa, John; Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: PRR24328 Dittenber Fraternities Production I have not heard anything, thanks! From: Armas, Sara <SArmas@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 10:46 AM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: PRR24328 Dittenber Fraternities Production I haven’t heard anything from the requestor in that timeframe but will let you know if I hear from them today! Sara Armas pronouns she/her/hers Deputy City Clerk I City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E SArmas@slocity.org T 805.781.7110 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 10:41 AM To: Armas, Sara <SArmas@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: PRR24328 Dittenber Fraternities Production Hey all! We last produced to the requester on 2/28 (see below). Since we haven’t heard from the requester for some time, Sadie in our office added a line requesting a response by today to keep the request open. Has anyone heard from Dittenber from 2/28 to today? Could you please email the group if she does reach out? Thank you – happy Friday! 2 From: Wooten, Eric Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 4:40 PM To: Dittenber, Sadie <sdittenber@mcclatchyservices.com> Cc: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Symens, Sadie <SSymens@slocity.org> Subject: RE: PRR24328 Dittenber Fraternities Production Sadie: I hope you are well. Per our previous email, we our producing our next batch of records in response to your California Public Records Act (“CPRA”) request. The latest batch (“Batch 4”) can be found here: Responsive Records Potentially responsive records in this batch have been reviewed by Eric Wooten, Paralegal, and Sadie Symens, Deputy City Attorney. Information identifying complainants of code enforcement violations has been redacted pursuant to City of San Jose v. Superior Court (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1008 and Government Code § 7922.000, as the public interest in nondisclosure clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure. Pages 1-21 contain a slideshow presented by Code Enforcement to a group of Cal Poly fraternity/sorority leaders as part of the Greek Leadership Institute organized by the Cal Poly Office of Fraternity & Sorority Life on April 16, 2024. Page 14 reflects a document created by a community complainant and provided to the City that was included in that presentation. Pages 22-101 are documents created by a community complainant and submitted to the City. The green and red text on page 22 are notations from Code Enforcement staff. Those annotations are the only content created by City staff on pages 22-101. The City makes no representations as to the accuracy or veracity of the statements, and there may be areas of disagreement between the City and the complainant as to some of the statements contained in these documents. Please let us know if you would like to speak to someone in the City’s Code Enforcement division to answer any questions that may arise after your review these files. Also, as it has been a while since we have heard from you regarding this request, please let us know by March 7th if you want the City to continue processing your CPRA request. If we do not hear from you by then, we will close out this request. Sincerely, Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with 3 publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 242 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:02 AM To:Symens, Sadie; Cohen, Rachel Subject:FW: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Fyi- From: Corey, Tyler Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:01 AM To: 'Dave Houghton' < Subject: RE: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Hi Dave, You are free to meet as you are with any applicant of a project on an agenda. If you choose to meet you will need to disclose this at the PC meeting on the 11th prior to taking action on the resolution language to revoke the Conditional use Permits. Just to be clear, the PC revoked the Conditional Use Permits for both fraternities at the 5/28 meeting and the CUPs are not up for discussion on the 11th, only the specific language of the revocation resolutions. Staff has also been contacted by Mr. Zuckermandel and we will be reaching out prior to the meeting to answer any questions. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Dave Houghton < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:18 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Good morning Tyler. I received this email (sent at 2am this morning!) and am not sure how to proceed. Any suggestions welcome. 243 Thanks, Dave Begin forwarded message: From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Subject: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Date: June 5, 2025 at 1:57:59 AM PDT To: " Good evening Chair Houghton, My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you again for your service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members. I also appreciate your concerns about ensuring the institutional memory of the organization needs to work to make sure fraternities remain good neighbors year after year. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel 244 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 11:01 AM To:Dave Houghton Subject:RE: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Hi Dave, You are free to meet as you are with any applicant of a project on an agenda. If you choose to meet you will need to disclose this at the PC meeting on the 11th prior to taking action on the resolution language to revoke the Conditional use Permits. Just to be clear, the PC revoked the Conditional Use Permits for both fraternities at the 5/28 meeting and the CUPs are not up for discussion on the 11th, only the specific language of the revocation resolutions. Staff has also been contacted by Mr. Zuckermandel and we will be reaching out prior to the meeting to answer any questions. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Dave Houghton < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:18 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Good morning Tyler. I received this email (sent at 2am this morning!) and am not sure how to proceed. Any suggestions welcome. Thanks, Dave Begin forwarded message: 245 From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Subject: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Date: June 5, 2025 at 1:57:59 AM PDT To: " Good evening Chair Houghton, My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you again for your service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members. I also appreciate your concerns about ensuring the institutional memory of the organization needs to work to make sure fraternities remain good neighbors year after year. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel 246 From:osrr@calpoly.edu Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:01 AM To:Salem, Rami Subject:A copy of the public report you submitted To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. June 5, 2025 To: Rami Salem | rsalem@slocity.org From: Student Rights & Responsibilities | osrr@calpoly.edu Dear Rami Salem: Thank you for reporting this incident, here is a copy for your records. Please note that the below information does not contain the entire report as submitted to OSRR. On June 5, 2025, you submitted a report to the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities concerning Delta Upsilon Fraternity group residing at1866 Loomis St. This was an incident of , and it occurred on . Incident Description: ILLEGAL FRATERNITY EVENT IN R1 RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD on 5/16/2025, Dunk a DUde 2025 philanthropy at 1866 Loomis St held by Delta Upsilon. If you submitted this incident in error, or if you would like to make any clarifications to this incident report, please contact OSRR at osrr@calpoly.edu or by phone at 805-756-2794 as soon as you can. Thank you for helping to uphold the integrity of Cal Poly and its students by reporting this incident. Sincerely, Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities 247 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 9:34 AM To:Cohen, Rachel Subject:FW: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Fyi- From: Dave Houghton < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:18 AM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Good morning Tyler. I received this email (sent at 2am this morning!) and am not sure how to proceed. Any suggestions welcome. Thanks, Dave Begin forwarded message: From: Jakob Zuckermandel < Subject: Follow Up Conversation on the Delta Chi Fraternity's Commitment to the Community Date: June 5, 2025 at 1:57:59 AM PDT To: " Good evening Chair Houghton, My name is Jakob Zuckermandel, President with the Delta Chi Fraternity. Thank you again for your service to our city. I appreciate the concerns you rightfully raised last week at the meeting in response to concerns raised by our fellow community members. I also appreciate your concerns about ensuring the institutional memory of the organization needs to work to make sure fraternities remain good neighbors year after year. Our fraternity chapter wants to do right by the community and continue to have a registered framework and agreement with the city. We feel that our Delta Chi chapter can be the good example of what a Fraternity can be as a neighbor. If you would be willing over the next few days, I would be happy to find a time to discuss those concerns and how we can work to address them and to outline our Fraternity's commitment to the community going forward. I would also like to bring our newly elected chapter president for next year along with representatives from our Alumni Board of Trustees and Housing Corporation. These are our alumni advisors and will help ensure the Fraternity's commitment to the community is continuous from year to year. 248 We would be happy to work around your schedule and find a time for a virtual meeting via zoom or teams. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. I hope to express to you our fraternity chapter's goal to become the model neighbor for our community members through the regulated conditional use process through the city. Please feel free to reach out. My cell is Thank you, Jakob Zuckermandel 251 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 9:12 AM To:City_Attorney Cc:CityClerk Subject:FW: Administrative Citation Appeal Attachments:Administrative Citation Appeal.pdf; 1.pdf Hello, We received a citation appeal form from Matthew Gnos, please see the attached files. It has been entered into the log. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Matthew < Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 5:15 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: Administrative Citation Appeal Hello, I have attached my appeal and the required forms below. Thank you, Matthew Gnos Matthew Gnos 240 Balceta Ct Danville, CA 94526 June 4, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Clerk 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally appeal the administrative citation issued to me on May 31, 2025, at 2:56 PM at 1264 E Foothill Blvd by Officer Sisemore (EMP NO. 80908) for an alleged violation of SLMC 9.12.050A/B regarding noise disturbances. I am the recipient of the administrative citation and serve as the Risk Manager for Lambda Chi Alpha fraternity. I am representing the organization in this matter. For this appeal, I elect to proceed with the Hearing Officer. While we acknowledge that a small gathering with soft music playing, I respectfully request that this citation be reconsidered for the following reasons: 1. Mistaken Source of Music We believe the citation was issued in error due to a misunderstanding about the source of the loud music. At the time of the alleged violation, a neighboring party was playing extremely loud music less than 300 feet away. We have video evidence from our property showing that the music continued even after ours had been shut off. Based on the timing and volume, we believe the responding officer mistakenly attributed the neighbor ’s music to our house. 2. Lack of Evidence Meeting Legal Threshold According to city ordinance, for a noise violation to be enforceable before 10 PM, the sound must be audible from at least 50 feet from the property line. The officer issued the citation while standing in our driveway. Bodycam footage confirms that the only music audible at the time of citation was from the neighboring party. 3. Supporting Evidence Demonstrates Neighboring Violation Between 3:31-3:34 pm, we have four video recordings from our backyard and the back alley documenting loud music coming from the neighbor’s property. This further supports our claim that the disturbance originated elsewhere. The officer even stated that the violation was based on what he heard in the back alley, not from the front of our property. The music in the back alley aligns with the direction of the neighboring party, as shown in our supporting footage. 4. Reasonable Efforts Were Taken to Prevent Violations We took active steps to avoid any noise issues. Sober monitors were stationed at both the front and back of the property throughout the event and were tasked with ensuring the music remained at a reasonable volume. At no point did they report that the music was too loud. We were fully mindful of city regulations and did everything we could to stay in compliance. Given these factors, I believe the citation was issued unfairly and respectfully request that it be dismissed. Please send all official correspondence related to this appeal to my mailing address: A copy of my payment receipt for the required appeal fee is attached. I affirm under penalty of perjury that the statements made in this appeal are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Matthew Gnos 263 From:Zion, Sarah Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 4:38 PM To:Wooten, Eric Subject:FW: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Attachments:Re: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit; PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records.pdf Hi Eric, I’m not sure if you looked at this one yet, but I wanted to share where the appeal data is. This is a record of every appeal received though, so there is a lot of information. I think we might be able to download this log as an excel sheet and filter it that way, but we can look more when I’m in tomorrow. Administrative Citation Appeals List From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 4:01 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: Public Records Request - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Hi all, Attached is a Public Records request from Yiming Luo for Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records, due by 06/14/2025. If you are not able to meet that deadline, please advise. Otherwise, please send the requested responsive documents to cityclerk@slocity.org. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications To:CityClerk Subject:Re: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Forgot toadd this - isthere any document orspreadsheet orchart that thecity has showing allnoise complaints received, founded or unfounded, and sorted byfraternity/property? Thanks, Yiming From: Yiming Luo Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:41 PM To: CityClerk@slocity.org <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Hi, I'mrequesting police records ofcalls made tothefollowing addresses, aswell asany citations issued from 9/10/2023 to 6/4/2025 forany reason, such asnoise, any appeals, andany determinations made from those appeals. 720 E. Foothill Blvd 1700 Fredericks 281 Albert 388 Chaplin 1861 Slack 1868 Loomis 1555 Slack Thanks, Yiming 1 1 From:Yiming Luo < To:CityClerk Subject:Re: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Forgot to add this - is there any document or spreadsheet or chart that the city has showing all noise complaints received, founded or unfounded, and sorted by fraternity/property? Thanks, Yiming From: Yiming Luo Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:41 PM To: CityClerk@slocity.org <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Hi, I'm requesting police records of calls made to the following addresses, as well as any citations issued from 9/10/2023 to 6/4/2025 for any reason, such as noise, any appeals, and any determinations made from those appeals. 720 E. Foothill Blvd 1700 Fredericks 281 Albert 388 Chaplin 1861 Slack 1868 Loomis 1555 Slack Thanks, Yiming 265 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 4:01 PM To: Cc:CityClerk Subject:Records Request Acknowledgement - PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records Attachments:PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records.pdf Yiming Luo, The City is in receipt of your public records request as of June 4, 2025 and will begin searching for responsive documents. If you have any questions in the meantime, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications To:CityClerk Subject:Re: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Forgot toadd this - isthere any document orspreadsheet orchart that thecity has showing allnoise complaints received, founded or unfounded, and sorted byfraternity/property? Thanks, Yiming From: Yiming Luo Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:41 PM To: CityClerk@slocity.org <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Hi, I'mrequesting police records ofcalls made tothefollowing addresses, aswell asany citations issued from 9/10/2023 to 6/4/2025 forany reason, such asnoise, any appeals, andany determinations made from those appeals. 720 E. Foothill Blvd 1700 Fredericks 281 Albert 388 Chaplin 1861 Slack 1868 Loomis 1555 Slack Thanks, Yiming 1 266 From:City of San Luis Obispo, CA <slocitywebmaster@enotify.visioninternet.com> Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 3:16 PM To:Cohen, Rachel Subject:Delta Chi Fraternity Conditional Use Permit Message submitted from the <City of San Luis Obispo, CA> website. Site Visitor Name: Chris Nielsen Site Visitor Email: Hello Ms. Cohen, My name is Chris Nielsen, an member of the Delta Chi Alumni Board of Trustees. Do you have some availability to discuss the recent meeting regarding the Delta Chi Fraternity Conditional Use Permit and how we can go forward from here? Thank you very much for the consideration. My cell is and I would be happy to meet via phone or zoom/teams at your earliest convenience. Thank you, Chris 267 From:Yiming Luo < Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:51 PM To:CityClerk Subject:Re: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Forgot to add this - is there any document or spreadsheet or chart that the city has showing all noise complaints received, founded or unfounded, and sorted by fraternity/property? Thanks, Yiming From: Yiming Luo Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:41 PM To: CityClerk@slocity.org <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Hi, I'm requesting police records of calls made to the following addresses, as well as any citations issued from 9/10/2023 to 6/4/2025 for any reason, such as noise, any appeals, and any determinations made from those appeals. 720 E. Foothill Blvd 1700 Fredericks 281 Albert 388 Chaplin 1861 Slack 1868 Loomis 1555 Slack Thanks, Yiming 270 From:Yiming Luo < Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 2:42 PM To:CityClerk Subject:PRA - Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit Hi, I'm requesting police records of calls made to the following addresses, as well as any citations issued from 9/10/2023 to 6/4/2025 for any reason, such as noise, any appeals, and any determinations made from those appeals. 720 E. Foothill Blvd 1700 Fredericks 281 Albert 388 Chaplin 1861 Slack 1868 Loomis 1555 Slack Thanks, Yiming 272 From:Wooten, Eric Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 8:17 AM To:City_Attorney Subject:Tribune Frat Article An article on the CUPs being revoked. SLO CA revokes permits for Cal Poly fraternities over noise | San Luis Obispo Tribune Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 275 From:Shoresman, Michelle Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 5:04 PM To:Jules Brownstein Subject:RE: A Student’s Perspective on the Value of Greek Life at Cal Poly Hi Jules, I completely understand and see all the wonderful benefits a fraternity (or sorority) can bring to someone’s time at Cal Poly or university in general. I want you to know that I personally, am grateful for the great experiences you are gaining from your fraternity experience. I hope we can all work together to be part of the positive, constructive solution to some of the historic challenges of fraternity/neighborhood relations. I think we have a great opportunity here to help show how lucky we are as a community to have these groups as neighbors and contributors to our broader city goals. Thanks again. Michelle From: Jules Brownstein < Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 4:28 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: A Student’s Perspective on the Value of Greek Life at Cal Poly Hello, As a current Cal Poly student and member of the Greek community, I wanted to share a personal perspective that often gets overlooked in broader conversations about Greek Life. For me, joining a fraternity wasn’t about parties or socializing but about finding belonging. College can be incredibly isolating, and the fraternity I joined gave me a support system, deep friendships, and a consistent source of encouragement during some of the most challenging moments in my life. It’s been essential to my mental health and overall well-being. I know I’m not the only one who feels this way. With nearly 20% of the student body involved in Greek Life, over 4,000 students have found similar meaning and connection. That’s about the same as Cal Poly's academic college. To remove or severely restrict these communities is, in many ways, turning away thousands of students who depend on them for growth, purpose, and support. I fully support holding organizations accountable, but I also hope that decisions moving forward consider how impactful and positive these communities can be when given the opportunity to succeed. Thank you for listening and your commitment to the well-being of all students in San Luis Obispo. 276 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 4:30 PM To:John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs Cc: Terry Reeves Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE-0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1) As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2) Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3) The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re- review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk . c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here: https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HUh_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 277 From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE-0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 278 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( 279 From:Jules Brownstein < Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 4:28 PM To:E-mail Council Website Subject:A Student’s Perspective on the Value of Greek Life at Cal Poly Hello, As a current Cal Poly student and member of the Greek community, I wanted to share a personal perspective that often gets overlooked in broader conversations about Greek Life. For me, joining a fraternity wasn’t about parties or socializing but about finding belonging. College can be incredibly isolating, and the fraternity I joined gave me a support system, deep friendships, and a consistent source of encouragement during some of the most challenging moments in my life. It’s been essential to my mental health and overall well-being. I know I’m not the only one who feels this way. With nearly 20% of the student body involved in Greek Life, over 4,000 students have found similar meaning and connection. That’s about the same as Cal Poly's academic college. To remove or severely restrict these communities is, in many ways, turning away thousands of students who depend on them for growth, purpose, and support. I fully support holding organizations accountable, but I also hope that decisions moving forward consider how impactful and positive these communities can be when given the opportunity to succeed. Thank you for listening and your commitment to the well-being of all students in San Luis Obispo. 280 From:Seth Herschel Murawsky <shmuraws@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 2:39 PM To:Wallace, Christine; Natalie Danielle Eckler Subject:Re: USFC :) Christine, Thank you for taking the time to interface with the students! I know they greatly appreciate it and I am looking forward to helping to foster more genuine connections! Best, Seth Murawsky, M.Ed. pronouns he/him/his Why Do Pronouns Matter? Equity & Inclusion Lead Coordinator, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7267 Book a meeting with me here From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 2:34 PM To: Natalie Danielle Eckler <neckler@calpoly.edu>, Seth Herschel Murawsky <shmuraws@calpoly.edu> Subject: USFC :) Hi Natalie and Seth, I just wanted to tell you how much I love USFC. Natalie, I really appreciate your leadership in getting me better connected to the chapters. I enjoyed my time with the group last night and I’m really looking forward to next fall. Fingers crossed I get a couple invites to chapter meetings! Seth, thanks so much for your support of the relationship building! Yours, Christine Wallace Police Public Affairs Manager Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E cwallace@slocity.org T 805.781.7186 slocity.org 281 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 282 From:The Tribune - News Alerts <news@newsletter.sanluisobispo.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 2:25 PM To:Holcomb, Kelly Subject:SLO revokes permits for 2 Cal Poly fraternity houses To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.The Tribune News Alerts To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Delta Chi’s house at 1236 Monte Vista Place. CAL POLY SLO revokes permits for 2 Cal Poly fraternity houses after noise complaints One commissioner said he hoped the decision would “send a real message” to fraternities that unruly behavior and noise won’t be tolerated. Go beyond the headlines with unlimited digital access $1.99 for 3 months To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.The Tribune mobile app To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 283 Get the news you care about most delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for newsletters To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Newsletter selections from The Tribune To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. This email was sent to kwhite@slocity.org because you are signed up to receive News Alerts. If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you may update your email preferences. We are unable to monitor replies to this email. Please contact customer service if you have any questions or concerns. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service Copyright © 2025 The Tribune. All Rights Reserved. 3940-7 Broad St. PMB 325, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 To help protect yo ur priv acy, To help protect yo ur priv acy, 284 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 1:43 PM To:Salem, Rami Subject:FW: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Attachments:Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha.pdf From: kathie walker < Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12:48 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Steven Walker < ; Brett Cross < ; Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < Subject: Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Hi Timmi and John, Lambda Chi Alpha had a huge party on Sunday, 5/31/2025. Several SLOPD officers responded, and a citation was issued for a party with 200 people. I did not call SLOPD about his party, but these "dayge" parties held by fraternities, featuring DJs, waterslides, and hundreds of people, have become increasingly common in our neighborhood in the past few years. Most are held in the backyards of illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood, and are extremely disruptive! This citation marks the fifth citation to the property this academic year and the THIRD citation since its Conditional Use Permit was approved on 10/15/2024. The SLOPD records are below: I believe the CUP includes a condition that the CUP will automatically be re-reviewed if the fraternity receives three violations of conditions within 12 months. The CUP also has a condition of a maximum of 48 people at any event or gathering at Lambda Chi Alpha's property, including 1264 Foothill and 1241, 1242, 1245, and 1251 Monte Vista. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity follow local laws, including the noise ordinance. 285 The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity not have any events with live entertainment, bands, or amplified sounds. The CUP also includes a condition that says failure to comply with any of the conditions or code requirements or conduct of the use to consitute a violation of [laws], OR to constitute a public nuisance, OR to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grouds for revocation of this permit. The citation on 10/18/2024 says there was a "large party and fireworks in the street" at 10 PM. This was only three days after the fraternity's CUP was approved by the City Council. The citation says there were 50 people at the party, which is self-reported by the person receiving the citation. Here, it was Thomas Symer, the fraternity president and the person who was at the hearing for approval of the CUP. The citation on 2/8/2025 was a live music event that was documented in a previous email I sent to you on 2/25/2025. That correspondence is attached to this email. The event violates several conditions of the CUP. The citation says there were 50 people at the event, which is self-reported by the fraternity. Still, it exceeds the maximum occupancy of any event or gathering, which is 48. It was also a live music event, as advertised on Lambda Chi Alpha's Instagram page. And it violated the City's noise ordinance. Therefore, the single event violated multiple conditions of the fraternity's CUP. The event on 5/31/2025 had at least 200 people, which is also a violation of several conditions of the CUP. As previously mentioned, it was also the third noise citation since Lambda Chi Alpha's approval of its CUP. Please have this CUP re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. Our family values Cal Poly and enjoys the students in our community, but there is a looming problem with the ongoing lack of respect and accountability of many of Cal Poly's fraternities. We hope the City will hold these problem houses responsible and that Cal Poly will cooperate with finding a solution. Thank you for your continued work on solving this issue. -Kathie kathie walker < CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha 2 messages kathie walker < Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:31 PM To: "Mezzapesa, John" <JMezzape@slocity.org>, "Tway, Timothea (Timmi)" <ttway@slocity.org> Cc: Sandra Rowley < , Brett Cross < Director Tway and Mr. Mezzapesa, This past weekend, my neighbor on Kentucky Street called me because he was upset that there were ongoing noisy parties from Foothill Blvd that he could hear from his house. Another neighbor on Hathway Avenue also heard the loud party complained to SLOPD. My neighbor on Kentucky Street wondered if I could hear the parties. He said he'd called SLOPD to report the noise in the 1300 block of Foothill (he guessed) and the noise stopped for a short time, but then resumed. So he called SLOPD again. SLOPD had Officer Brewer call my neighbor and the officer said he'd responded to Foothill but the fraternity saw his police unit and turned down the noise, therefore he was not able to document the party. However, the party was at 1264 Foothill and is noted in the SLOPD dispatch log for the weekend. You can see that the call comments on the PD log indicate my neighbor reported a loud party in the 1300-1400 block of Foothill but wasn't sure of the exact address. Officer Brewer identified the party at 1264 Foothill but since the fraternity members saw his police vehicle, they turned down the music before he could get out of his vehicle to document the party so he did not issue a citation. Nonetheless, Lambda Chi Alpha at 1264 Foothill Blvd has been issued three noise citations, not including this call or other complaints that were not cited, since the fraternity received approval for its CUP. This meets the threshold of three violations listed in the CUP which triggers re-review of the fraternity's CUP with the Planning Commission. Additionally, they held a live music event at 1264 Foothill Blvd on 2/8/2025. Although this event was not cited by SLOPD, it is still a violation of the conditions of the fraternity's CUP. A link to the event is posted in their Instagram bio. Tickets were purchased through eventbrite.com. 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…1/5 I appreciate that you are taking the fraternity problem seriously and working toward a solution. Historically, before you were employed with the city, Community Development and Code Enforcement did not keep track of the fraternity CUPs or illegal fraternity locations, which led to the total breakdown of our neighborhood. I remain optimistic that we will be able to solve the problem. For example, Alpha Epsilon Pi seems to be taking the matter seriously since its re-review with the Planning Commission and has been much more respectful. However, Lambda Chi Alpha has flouted the terms of its CUP and has held disruptive parties and events, in violation of the conditions of its CUP. Please hold Lambda Chi Alpha responsible for these violations. The CUP states that three violations within 12 months trigger a re-review of the CUP and we have met that threshold, therefore there should be a re-review of the fraternity's CUP. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Respectfully, Kathie Walker Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:08 PM To: kathie walker < , "Mezzapesa, John" <JMezzape@slocity.org> Cc: Sandra Rowley < , Brett Cross < , "Corey, Tyler" <tcorey@slocity.org> Hi Kathie, Thank you for this email and the information. Code Enforcement and Planning will be reviewing it and supporting information to confirm that a re- review is required. We will let you know when it is scheduled for Planning Commission, Thank you, Timmi 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…2/5 From: kathie walker < Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 3:31 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Sandra Rowley < ; Bre Cross < Subject: CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Director Tway and Mr. Mezzapesa, This past weekend, my neighbor on Kentucky Street called me because he was upset that there were ongoing noisy parties from Foothill Blvd that he could hear from his house. Another neighbor on Hathway Avenue also heard the loud party complained to SLOPD. My neighbor on Kentucky Street wondered if I could hear the parties. He said he'd called SLOPD to report the noise in the 1300 block of Foothill (he guessed) and the noise stopped for a short time, but then resumed. So he called SLOPD again. SLOPD had Officer Brewer call my neighbor and the officer said he'd responded to Foothill but the fraternity saw his police unit and turned down the noise, therefore he was not able to document the party. However, the party was at 1264 Foothill and is noted in the SLOPD dispatch log for the weekend. You can see that the call comments on the PD log indicate my neighbor reported a loud party in the 1300-1400 block of Foothill but wasn't sure of the exact address. Officer Brewer identified the party at 1264 Foothill but since the fraternity members saw his police vehicle, they turned down the music before he could get out of his vehicle to document the party so he did not issue a citation. Nonetheless, Lambda Chi Alpha at 1264 Foothill Blvd has been issued three noise citations, not including this call or other complaints that were not cited, since the fraternity received approval for its CUP. This meets the threshold of three violations listed in the CUP which triggers re-review of the fraternity's CUP with the Planning Commission. Additionally, they held a live music event at 1264 Foothill Blvd on 2/8/2025. Although this event was not cited by SLOPD, it is still a violation of the conditions of the fraternity's CUP. 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…3/5 A link to the event is posted in their Instagram bio. Tickets were purchased through eventbrite.com. 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…4/5 [Quoted text hidden] 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…5/5 289 From:kathie walker < Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12:48 PM To:Mezzapesa, John; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Steven Walker; Brett Cross; Sandra Rowley; Carolyn Smith Subject:Lambda Chi Alpha - 1264 Foothill Attachments:Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha.pdf Hi Timmi and John, Lambda Chi Alpha had a huge party on Sunday, 5/31/2025. Several SLOPD officers responded, and a citation was issued for a party with 200 people. I did not call SLOPD about his party, but these "dayge" parties held by fraternities, featuring DJs, waterslides, and hundreds of people, have become increasingly common in our neighborhood in the past few years. Most are held in the backyards of illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood, and are extremely disruptive! This citation marks the fifth citation to the property this academic year and the THIRD citation since its Conditional Use Permit was approved on 10/15/2024. The SLOPD records are below: I believe the CUP includes a condition that the CUP will automatically be re-reviewed if the fraternity receives three violations of conditions within 12 months. The CUP also has a condition of a maximum of 48 people at any event or gathering at Lambda Chi Alpha's property, including 1264 Foothill and 1241, 1242, 1245, and 1251 Monte Vista. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity follow local laws, including the noise ordinance. The CUP also includes a condition that the fraternity not have any events with live entertainment, bands, or amplified sounds. The CUP also includes a condition that says failure to comply with any of the conditions or code requirements or conduct of the use to consitute a violation of [laws], OR to constitute a public nuisance, OR to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grouds for revocation of this permit. 290 The citation on 10/18/2024 says there was a "large party and fireworks in the street" at 10 PM. This was only three days after the fraternity's CUP was approved by the City Council. The citation says there were 50 people at the party, which is self-reported by the person receiving the citation. Here, it was Thomas Symer, the fraternity president and the person who was at the hearing for approval of the CUP. The citation on 2/8/2025 was a live music event that was documented in a previous email I sent to you on 2/25/2025. That correspondence is attached to this email. The event violates several conditions of the CUP. The citation says there were 50 people at the event, which is self-reported by the fraternity. Still, it exceeds the maximum occupancy of any event or gathering, which is 48. It was also a live music event, as advertised on Lambda Chi Alpha's Instagram page. And it violated the City's noise ordinance. Therefore, the single event violated multiple conditions of the fraternity's CUP. The event on 5/31/2025 had at least 200 people, which is also a violation of several conditions of the CUP. As previously mentioned, it was also the third noise citation since Lambda Chi Alpha's approval of its CUP. Please have this CUP re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. Our family values Cal Poly and enjoys the students in our community, but there is a looming problem with the ongoing lack of respect and accountability of many of Cal Poly's fraternities. We hope the City will hold these problem houses responsible and that Cal Poly will cooperate with finding a solution. Thank you for your continued work on solving this issue. -Kathie kathie walker < CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha 2 messages kathie walker < Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:31 PM To: "Mezzapesa, John" <JMezzape@slocity.org>, "Tway, Timothea (Timmi)" <ttway@slocity.org> Cc: Sandra Rowley < , Brett Cross < Director Tway and Mr. Mezzapesa, This past weekend, my neighbor on Kentucky Street called me because he was upset that there were ongoing noisy parties from Foothill Blvd that he could hear from his house. Another neighbor on Hathway Avenue also heard the loud party complained to SLOPD. My neighbor on Kentucky Street wondered if I could hear the parties. He said he'd called SLOPD to report the noise in the 1300 block of Foothill (he guessed) and the noise stopped for a short time, but then resumed. So he called SLOPD again. SLOPD had Officer Brewer call my neighbor and the officer said he'd responded to Foothill but the fraternity saw his police unit and turned down the noise, therefore he was not able to document the party. However, the party was at 1264 Foothill and is noted in the SLOPD dispatch log for the weekend. You can see that the call comments on the PD log indicate my neighbor reported a loud party in the 1300-1400 block of Foothill but wasn't sure of the exact address. Officer Brewer identified the party at 1264 Foothill but since the fraternity members saw his police vehicle, they turned down the music before he could get out of his vehicle to document the party so he did not issue a citation. Nonetheless, Lambda Chi Alpha at 1264 Foothill Blvd has been issued three noise citations, not including this call or other complaints that were not cited, since the fraternity received approval for its CUP. This meets the threshold of three violations listed in the CUP which triggers re-review of the fraternity's CUP with the Planning Commission. Additionally, they held a live music event at 1264 Foothill Blvd on 2/8/2025. Although this event was not cited by SLOPD, it is still a violation of the conditions of the fraternity's CUP. A link to the event is posted in their Instagram bio. Tickets were purchased through eventbrite.com. 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…1/5 I appreciate that you are taking the fraternity problem seriously and working toward a solution. Historically, before you were employed with the city, Community Development and Code Enforcement did not keep track of the fraternity CUPs or illegal fraternity locations, which led to the total breakdown of our neighborhood. I remain optimistic that we will be able to solve the problem. For example, Alpha Epsilon Pi seems to be taking the matter seriously since its re-review with the Planning Commission and has been much more respectful. However, Lambda Chi Alpha has flouted the terms of its CUP and has held disruptive parties and events, in violation of the conditions of its CUP. Please hold Lambda Chi Alpha responsible for these violations. The CUP states that three violations within 12 months trigger a re-review of the CUP and we have met that threshold, therefore there should be a re-review of the fraternity's CUP. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Respectfully, Kathie Walker Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:08 PM To: kathie walker < , "Mezzapesa, John" <JMezzape@slocity.org> Cc: Sandra Rowley < , Brett Cross < , "Corey, Tyler" <tcorey@slocity.org> Hi Kathie, Thank you for this email and the information. Code Enforcement and Planning will be reviewing it and supporting information to confirm that a re- review is required. We will let you know when it is scheduled for Planning Commission, Thank you, Timmi 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…2/5 From: kathie walker < Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 3:31 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Sandra Rowley < ; Bre Cross < Subject: CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Director Tway and Mr. Mezzapesa, This past weekend, my neighbor on Kentucky Street called me because he was upset that there were ongoing noisy parties from Foothill Blvd that he could hear from his house. Another neighbor on Hathway Avenue also heard the loud party complained to SLOPD. My neighbor on Kentucky Street wondered if I could hear the parties. He said he'd called SLOPD to report the noise in the 1300 block of Foothill (he guessed) and the noise stopped for a short time, but then resumed. So he called SLOPD again. SLOPD had Officer Brewer call my neighbor and the officer said he'd responded to Foothill but the fraternity saw his police unit and turned down the noise, therefore he was not able to document the party. However, the party was at 1264 Foothill and is noted in the SLOPD dispatch log for the weekend. You can see that the call comments on the PD log indicate my neighbor reported a loud party in the 1300-1400 block of Foothill but wasn't sure of the exact address. Officer Brewer identified the party at 1264 Foothill but since the fraternity members saw his police vehicle, they turned down the music before he could get out of his vehicle to document the party so he did not issue a citation. Nonetheless, Lambda Chi Alpha at 1264 Foothill Blvd has been issued three noise citations, not including this call or other complaints that were not cited, since the fraternity received approval for its CUP. This meets the threshold of three violations listed in the CUP which triggers re-review of the fraternity's CUP with the Planning Commission. Additionally, they held a live music event at 1264 Foothill Blvd on 2/8/2025. Although this event was not cited by SLOPD, it is still a violation of the conditions of the fraternity's CUP. 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…3/5 A link to the event is posted in their Instagram bio. Tickets were purchased through eventbrite.com. 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…4/5 [Quoted text hidden] 6/3/25, 11:50 AM Gmail - CUP for 1264 Foothill - Lambda Chi Alpha https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c193ab931d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8858423169863913471&simpl=msg-a:r89851642677629…5/5 291 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 10:22 AM To:Wynn, Eva Subject:Zoning 2004 Attachments:Zoning Regulation.pdf See attached Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications $ 5.50 Zoning Regulations June 24, 2004 11-04 Community Development Department Our Mission Statement Our mission is to serve all persons in a positive and courteous manner and help ensure that San Luis Obispo continues to be a healthy, safe, attractive, and enjoyable place to live, work, or visit. We help plan the City’s form and character, support community values, preserve the environment, promote the wise use of resources, and protect public health and safety. Our Service Philosophy The City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff provides high quality service when you need it. We will: 9 Listen to understand your needs; 9 Give clear, accurate and prompt answers to your questions; 9 Explain how you can achieve your goals under the City’s rules; 9 Help resolve problems in an open, objective manner; 9 Maintain high ethical standards; and 9 Work to improve our service. i The City of San Luis Obispo adopted their first City Zoning Regulations in 1947. The current Zoning Regulations were adopted by City Council Ordinance No. 941 (1982 Series) and became effective January 7, 1983. Various amendments, as outlined below, have occurred in order to keep the regulations current with State law, the City’s General Plan, and Council direction. These Zoning Regulations, an extract of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, are provided for the general information of the public. Although carefully proofread, errors or omissions may occur. This material is current as of the date of the latest amendment listed below. Additional amendments may have been adopted since that date, which are not yet included. City planning staff can advise you of the most recent amendments, if any, as well as corrections made to the text. AMENDMENTS Ordinance No. 946 (1983 Series) - Amended Section 17.22.010 of the Zoning Regulations concerning the regulation of electronic game amusement centers, effective 3/13/83. Ordinance No. 1004 (1984 Series) - Added Section 17.21 to the Zoning Regulations, relating to the regulation of second residential units, effective 3/6/84. Ordinance No. 1006 (1984 Series) - Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations, effective 3/21/84. Ordinance No. 1008 (1984 Series) - Amended Section 17.22.010 of the Zoning Regulations concerning uses allowed in the C-N zone (CR 1122-A), effective 5/17/84. Ordinance No. 1009 (1984 Series) - Amended Section 17.16.020 of the Zoning Regulations concerning intersection visibility, effective 5/17/84. Ordinance No. 1016 (1984 Series) - Amended Section 17.36 of the Zoning Regulations concerning commercial uses in public schools (CR 1173), effective 8/16/84. Ordinance No. 1023 (1984 Series) - Amended Section 17.42.020 of the Zoning Regulations concerning parking in the C-C zone (CR 1167), effective 11/1/84. Ordinance No. 1034 (1985 Series) - Amended Section 17.21.030 of the Zoning Regulations establishing size limits for second residential units (SB 1160 and 1534), effective 3/21/85. Ordinance No. 1050 (1985 Series) - Amended Section 17.42.020 of the Zoning Regulations regarding parking in the C-C zone (CR 1234), effective 1/16/86. Ordinance No. 1058 (1986 Series) - Amended Section 17.22.010 of the Zoning Regulation regarding carwashes in the C-T zone (CR 1246), effective 5/1/86. Ordinance No. 1074 (1986 Series) - Amended Section 17.42.020 of the Zoning Regulations. regarding parking in the C-C zone (CR 1272), effective 10/19/86. Ordinance No. 1085 (1987 Series) - Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations. Minor miscellaneous revisions (CR 1284), effective 2/19/87. Ordinance No. 1086 (1987 Series) - Amended Section 17.54 of the Zoning Regulations regarding historical preservation (CR 1250), effective 3/1/87. Ordinance No. 1087 (1987 Series) - Amended Section 17.22.010 and 17.62.040 of the Zoning ii Regulations regarding large professional office buildings in the C-S or M zones (GP/CR 1299), effective 4/1/87. Ordinance No. 1088 (1987 Series) - Amended Sections 17.22.010 and 17.34.020 of the Zoning Regulations regarding non-residential projects in the O zone (GP/CR 1299), effective 4/15/87. Ordinance No. 1101 (1987 Series) - Amended Section 17.42.020 of the Zoning Regulations adjusting parking standards and establishing parking in-lieu fees for the central-commercial zone (CR 1234), effective 11/19/87. Ordinance No. 1102 (1987 Series) - Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations (CR 1307), effective 12/31/87. Ordinance No. 1103 (1987 Series) - Amended Sections 17.04.371 and 17.22.010 of the Zoning Regulations regarding theaters in the C-N zone (GP/R 1324), effective 12/17/87. Ordinance No. 1107 (1988 Series) - Added Section 17.16.110 to the Zoning Regulations concerning satellite dish antennas (CR 1307), effective 2/4/88. Ordinance No. 1110 (1988 Series) - Amended Section 17.22.010 of the Zoning Regulations to allow churches, synagogues, and temples in the C-S zone (R 1347), effective 3/15/88. Ordinance No. 1114 (1988 Series) - Suspended the implementation of a part of Ordinance No. 1102 relating parking standards to unit size (CR 1307), effective 3/15/88. Ordinance No. 1120 (1988 Series) - Amended Sections 17.24 through 17.48 of the Zoning Regulations regarding maximum lot coverage allowed for churches, synagogues, and temples (R 1372), effective 8/2/88. Ordinance No. 1122 (1988 Series) - Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations concerning homeless shelters (CR 1383), effective 12/15/88. Ordinance No. 1124 (1988 Series) - Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations concerning concurrent sales of alcoholic beverages and motor fuel (CR 1402), effective 1/5/89. Ordinance No. 1128 (1988 Series) - Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations regarding electronic game amusement centers (CR 1402), effective 1/19/89. Ordinance No. 1129 (1988 Series) - Amended Sections 17.50.010 and 17.62.040 of the Zoning Regulations regarding requirements for planned developments (R 1419), effective 2/2/89. Ordinance No. 1154 (1989 Series) - Added Section 17.93 to the Zoning Regulations: High Occupancy Residential Use Regulations (R 1458), effective 2/14/90. Ordinance No. 1157 (1989 Series) - Amended Section 17.22.010 of the Zoning Regulations to allow postal offices and services in the C-N zone (R 1460), effective 2/1/90. Ordinance No. 1161 (1990 Series) - Amended the Zoning Regulations to allow non-profit theaters in the PF zone, subject to approval of a use permit by the Planning Commission (GP/R 1461), effective 3/8/90. Ordinance No. 1180 (1990 Series) - Amended the Zoning Regulations to conditionally allow neighborhood grocery markets in the high-density residential (R-4) zone (R 1487), effective 12/20/90. Ordinance No. 1182 (1990 Series) - Amended Section 17.22.020 of the Zoning Regulations to allow child day care centers in the Service Commercial (C-S) and Industrial (M) zones (R 1494), effective 1/3/91. Ordinance No. 1210 (1992 Series) - Added Chapter 17.55 to the Zoning Regulations concerning the Mixed-Use Zone (CR 1538), effective 7/1/92. Ordinance No. 1222 (1992 Series) - Amended Sections 17.22.010 and 17.16.060 of the Zoning Regulations concerning various retail uses in the C-N zone (R 27-92), effective 10/15/92. Ordinance No. 1225 (1992 Series) - Added Section 17.08.045 to the Zoning Regulations: Day Care Homes and Centers. Amended Sections 17.04.095, 17.04.150, 17.08.040, 17.16.060, 17.22.010 of the Zoning Regulations concerning regulation of day care facilities (R 132-92), effective 11/6/92. Ordinance No. 1235 (1993 Series) Amended the Zoning Regulations Text (Table 9) to simplify iii processing, eliminate duplications, and clarify items (R 219-92, Phase 1), effective 7/1/93. Ordinance No. 1248 (1993 Series) Amended the Zoning Regulations (Table 9) to allow utility offices and pay points in the Office and Public- Facilities zones (R 94-93), effective 11/3/93. Ordinance No. 1251 (1994 Series) Amended Municipal Code Section 17.12.020.A to allow exceptions to the merger provisions for adjacent nonconforming lots under certain circumstances, effective 2/4/94. Ordinance No. 1257 (1994 Series) Amended the Zoning Regulations (Table 9) to allow various uses in the C-N zone, effective 4/15/94. Ordinance No. 1258 (1994 Series) Amended the Zoning Regulations (Table 9) to allow video stores up to 3,000 sq. ft. in the C-N zone, effective 5/5/94. Ordinance No. 1265 (1994 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations text to simplify processing, add and change definitions, clarify wording and format, and make minor changes to development standards, effective 7/21/94. Ordinance No. 1277 (1995 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations text to strengthen and expand existing property maintenance standards ( TA 175-93), effective 4/21/95. Ordinance No. 1295 (1996 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations text (Table 9) to specifically distinguish types of commercial antennas and broadcasting facilities (GP/R 105-95), effective 5/16/96. Ordinance No. 1302 (1996 Series) Adding Creek Setback Provisions to the Zoning Regulations Text, effective 10/3/96. Ordinance No. 1304 (1996 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations text (Table 9) to allow mechanical carwashes in the C-N zone under certain circumstances, and removing the 1000- foot spacing requirement for carwashes in the C- T zone (TA 64-96), effective 9/20/96. Ordinance No. 1305 (1996 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations text (Table 9) to allow nightclubs in the C-S zone with the approval of a Planning Commission Use Permit, and the addition of a footnote (TA 87-96), effective 10/3/96. Ordinance No. 1328 (1997 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations to allow emergency medical facilities no larger than 3,500 square feet in C-N zones, with approval of an Administrative Use Permit, effective 11/4/97. Ordinance 1346 (1999 Series) Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations, effective 2/19/99. Ordinance No. 1365 (2000 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations for improved consistency with the General Plan and State Law; clarifications and corrections; and the establishment of an Agricultural Zoning District., effective 2/18/00. Ordinance No. 1402 (2001 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations Creek Setback Standards, effective 11/15/01. Ordinance No. 1405 (2001 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations to establish maximum building size and maximum parking requirements for large-scale retail establishments in all commercial zoning districts and to exempt existing large retail establishments from the size limitations., effective 1/10/02. Ordinance No. 1409 (2002 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations to expand the zones in which wireless telecommunications facilities may locate, subject to certain development standards, effective 5/2/02. Ordinance No. 1412 (2002 Series) Amended various sections of the Zoning Regulations related to property maintenance regulations, effective 5/2/02. Ordinance No. 1429 (2003 Series) Amended Zoning Regulations to establish site development and performance standards for Bed and Breakfast Inns in the R-3, R-4 and AG zone districts, effective 3/20/03. Ordinance No. 1434 (2003 Series) Amended the Zoning Regulations Chapter 17.21, Secondary Dwelling Units, in compliance with AB 1866, effective 6/5/03. iv Ordinance No. 1437 (2003 Series) Established the Community Commercial (C-C) zone and the Downtown-Commercial (C-D) zone, and rezoned property from Neighborhood-Commercial (C-N) and Service-Commercial Planned Development (C-S-PD) to Community-Commercial (C-C), effective 7/31/03. Ordinance No. 1438 (2003 Series) Amended the Zoning Regulations to implement the Commercial Zoning revisions, effective 7/3/03. Ordinance No. 1446 (2004 Series) Amended the Zoning Regulations to modify regulation of the concurrent sale of alcohol and motor fuel, effective 3/31/04. TITLE 17 ZONING REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS (Additional chapters published separately listed on following page) Section Page Amendments – listing…………………………………………………………………………………...i 17.02 General Provisions………………………………………………………………………...................1 17.06 Zones Established—Zoning Map…………………………………………………………………3 17.08 Uses Allowed in Several Zones………………...…………………………………………………5 17.08.010 Temporary and intermittent uses………………………………………………………..............5 17.08.020 Outdoor sales………………………………………………………………………………………….7 17.08.030 Service stations……………………………………………………………………………………….8 17.08.040 Concurrent sales of motor fuel/ alcoholic beverages from service stations…………8 17.08.050 Vending machines……………………………………………………………………………………9 17.08.060 Electronic game amusement centers…………………………………………………………..10 17.08.070 Mineral extraction…………………………………………………………………………………….11 17.08.072 Mixed-use projects………………………………………………………….…………....................11 17.08.080 Public utilities……………………………………………………………………………………….….13 17.08.090 Home occupation………………………………………………………………………....................13 17.08.095 Convenience stores/Neighborhood Grocery Markets……………………………………..15 17.08.100 Child and adult day care……………………………………………………………………………15 17.08.110 Homeless shelters……………………………………………………………………………………17 17.08.120 Pool and pool equipment……………………………………………………………….................17 17.08.130 Live/work and work/live units………………………………………………………….................18 17.10 Nonconforming Uses………………………………………………………………………………….21 17.12 Nonconforming Lots…………………………………………………………………………………..22 17.14 Nonconforming Structures………………………………………………………………………….23 17.16 Property Development Standards……………………………………………………….............24 17.16.005 Applicability of other provisions………………………………………………………................24 17.16.010 Density………………………………………………………………………………….....................…25 Maximum Residential Density for Cross-Slope Categories (TABLE 1)………………………...26 17.16.015 Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit…………………………………………………………...27 17.16.020 Yards (setback requirements)……………………………………………….…………..............27 Minimum Street Yards (TABLE 2)……………………………………………………………….28 Minimum Other Yards in R-1 and R-2 Zones (TABLE 3) ……………………………………...29 Minimum Other Yards in R-3, R-4, O and C-N Zones (TABLE 4) ………………….…………29 Minimum Other Yards in C/OS, PF, C-C,C-D,C-R,C-T,C-S and M Zones (TABLE 5) …….30 17.16.025 Creek setbacks…………………………………………………………………………....................34 17.16.030 Coverage…………………………………………………………………….………….......................38 17.16.035 Size limits on large-scale retail establishments……………………………………………...39 17.16.040 Height……………………………………………………………………….………….........................40 17.16.050 Fences, walls and hedges…………………………………………………………………………41 17.16.060 Parking space requirements……………………………………………………………...............41 Parking Requirements by Use (TABLE 6)……………………………………………………….44 Bicycle Parking Space Requirements (TABLE 6.5)……………………………………….……50 17.16.070 Parking and driveway design and exceptions………………………………………………..51 17.16.090 Screening of outdoor sales and storage………………………………………………………52 17.16.110 Satellite dish antenna………………………………………………………………………………..52 17.16.120 Wireless telecommunication facilities…………………………………………………………..53 17.17 Property Maintenance Standards………………………………………………………………..58 17.17.030 General requirements……………………………………………………….………………………58 17.17.040 Visible storage or maintenance—Storage and maintenance to be screened………59 17.17.050 Front yard paving……………………………………………………………………………….…….59 17.17.060 Roofs………………………………………………………………………………………………….….60 17.17.070 Fences…………………………………………………………………………………………………...60 17.17.075 Neighborhood preservation………………………………………………………………………..60 17.17.080 Prohibited acts………………………………………………………………………………………...61 17.17.090 Private cause of action………………………………………………………………...……………61 17.18 Performance Standards……………………………………………………………………...………62 17.18.010 Noise…………………………………………………………………………………..…………………62 17.18.020 Vibration……………………………………………………………………………..………………….62 17.18.030 Illumination…………………………………………………………………………..………………...62 17.18.040 Air contaminants………………………………………………………………….…………………..62 17.18.050 Discharges to water or public sewer system…………………………………………………62 17.18.060 Heat…………………………………………………………………………………………..…………..63 17.18.070 Solid waste………………………………………………………………….…………………….……63 17.18.080 Energy conservation…………………………………………………………………………………63 17.18.080 General and special conditions……………………………………………………………..……63 17.19 Bed and Breakfast Establishments……………………………………………...………………64 17.20 Residential Occupancy Standards………………………………………………………………67 17.20.010 Group housing—Permitted upon approval of use permit…………………………………67 17.20.020 Group housing - Occupancy limits………………………………………………………………67 Maximum Population Density for each Zone (TABLE 8)………………………………………67 17.21 Secondary Dwelling Units………………………………………………………………………..…68 17.22 Use Regulations……………………………………………………………………………………...…72 Uses Allowed by Zone (TABLE 9)………………………………………………………………..75 17.24 Low-Density Residential (R-1) Zone………………………………………………………….…82 17.26 Medium-Density Residential (R-2) Zone……………………………………………….………83 17.28 Medium-High-Density Residential (R-3) Zone………………………………………….……84 17.30 High-Density Residential (R-4) Zone…………………………………………………………….85 17.32 Conservation/Open Space (C/OS) Zone…………………………………….…………………86 17.33 Agriculture (AG) Zone……………………………………………………….……………………….87 17.34 Office (O) Zone……………………………………………………………….……………………….…88 17.36 Public Facility (PF) Zone…………………………………………………….……………………….89 17.38 Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) Zone…………………………………….……………..……92 17.40 Retail Commercial (C-R) Zone…………………………………………………………................93 17.41 Community Commercial (C-C) Zone……………………………………….……………………94 17.42 Downtown Commercial (C-D) Zone……………………………………………………..............95 17.44 Tourist Commercial (C-T) Zone…………………………………………….……………………..97 17.46 Service Commercial (C-S) Zone…………………………………………………………………..98 17.48 Manufacturing (M) Zone…………………………………………………….……………………….99 17.50 Planned Development (PD) Overlay Zone………………………………….…………………100 17.52 Specific Plan (SP) Overlay Zone…………………………………………….……………………101 17.54 Historical Preservation (H) Zone………………………………………………………………….102 17.55 Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone………………………………………………………….................103 17.56 Special Consideration (S) Zone………………………………………………………………..…104 17.58 Use Permits………………………………………………………………………………......................105 17.60 Variances………………………………………………………………………………………………..…109 17.62 Planned Development………………………………………………………………………………...111 17.64 Repeat Applications………………………………………………………………………………...…115 16.66 Appeals…………………………………………………………………………………………………..…116 17.68 Fees…………………………………………………………………………………………………….…...117 17.70 Amendments……………………………………………………………………………………………..118 17.72 Enforcement……………………………………………………………………………………………...120 17.93 High Occupancy Residential Use Regulations…………………………………………......121 17.100 Definitions………………………………………………………………………………………………...123 These sections of Chapter 17 of the Municipal Code are not part of the “Zoning Regulations” handout and are published under separate cover. Chapter Title 17.74 Building Setback Lines 17.75 Street Right-of-Way Dedication and Improvement 17.80 General Plan Amendment Regulations 17.82 Residential Condominium Development and Conversion 17.84 Flood Damage Prevention Regulations 17.86 Downtown Housing Conversion Permits 17.87 Major Office Development Permits 17.88 Residential Growth Management Regulations 17.89 Water Allocation Regulations 17.90 Affordable Housing Incentives 17.91 Inclusionary Housing Requirements 17.92 Onshore Support Facilities 17.94 Development Agreements 17.95 Adult Entertainment Businesses 17.98 Public Art Requirements for Private Development City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 1 Chapter 17.02: General Provisions Sections: 17.02.010 Title. 17.02.020 Purpose. 17.02.030 General requirement. 17.02.040 Interpretation. 17.02.050 General plan consistency - Regulations interpretation and application. 17.02.010 Title This division shall be known and cited as the "Zoning Regulations of the City." (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9201.1) 17.02.020 Purpose. These regulations are intended to guide the development of the city in an orderly manner, based on the adopted general plan, to protect and enhance the quality of the natural and built environment, and to promote the public health, safety and general welfare by regulating the use of land and buildings and the location and basic form of structures. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9201.2) 17.02.030 General requirement. Land or buildings may be used and structures may be erected or altered only in accordance with these regulations. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9201.5) 17.02.040 Interpretation. A. Ambiguity. The Director shall interpret these regulations, subject to the appeal procedures of Chapter 17.66. Written requests for interpretation shall be responded to in writing within 10 days and shall become part of the permanent files of the Community Development Department. B. Zone District Boundaries. 1. Boundaries between zoning districts generally follow lot lines or their extensions, physical features, or contour lines, as noted on the official zoning map. Boundaries adjoining streets shall be assumed to follow the centerlines of streets if such location becomes an issue in the use of private property, such as when a street is abandoned. Zones which meet a street centerline shall not be considered "adjacent." 2. The location of boundaries which are not readily determined by inspection of the official zone map shall be determined by the Director. C. Conflict with Public Provisions. These regulations are not intended to interfere with or annul any other law or regulation. Where these regulations impose a restriction different from any other law or regulation, the more restrictive shall apply. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 2 D. Conflict with Private Provisions. These regulations are not intended to interfere with or annul any easement, covenant, or other agreement between private parties. Where these regulations impose a restriction different from a private agreement, the provisions which are more restrictive or which impose higher standards shall control. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.5) 17.02.050 General plan consistency - Regulations interpretation and application. The regulations codified in this title shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the general plan. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.1) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 3 Chapter 17.06: Zones Established - Zoning Map Sections: 17.06.010 Designation of zones. 17.06.020 Areas within the city to be designated within a zone district - Zoning Map to be a part of these regulations. 17.06.010 Designation of zones. For purpose of the regulations set out in this division, the following zones are created: Residential Zones: R-1 Low-density residential R-2 Medium-density residential R-3 Medium-high-density residential R-4 High-density residential (includes former R-H zone) Non-residential Zones: C/OS Conservation/Open Space (formerly A/C) O Office (formerly PO) PF Public Facility C-N Neighborhood-Commercial C-C Community-Commercial C-D Downtown Commercial C-R Retail-Commercial C-T Tourist-Commercial C-S Service-Commercial (formerly C-H) M Industrial (Manufacturing) AG Agricultural (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)) Overlay Zones: SP Specific Plan H Historical and Architectural Preservation S Special Considerations PD Planned Development MU Mixed Use (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9201.3) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 4 17.06.020 Areas within the city to be designated within a zone district - Zoning map to be a part of these regulations. All areas within the city shall be designated within a zone district. The official zone map, which shall depict all duly adopted zone districts, is as much a part of these regulations as if it were fully contained in this document. The official zone map shall be maintained by and in the Department of Community Development, and for convenience in more easily identifying zone boundaries may be divided into parts. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9201.4) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 5 Chapter 17.08: Uses Allowed In Several Zones Sections: 17.08.010 Temporary uses. 17.08.020 Outdoor sales. 17.08.030 Service stations. 17.08.040 Concurrent sales of motor fuel and alcoholic beverages. 17.08.050 Vending machines. 17.08.060 Electronic game amusement centers. 17.08.070 Mineral extraction. 17.08.080 Public utilities. 17.08.090 Home occupations. 17.08.095 Neighborhood grocery markets. 17.08.100 Child and adult day care. 17.08.110 Homeless shelters. 17.08.010 Temporary and Intermittent Uses. A. Purpose and Intent. The provisions codified in this chapter provide for certain temporary and intermittent uses. It establishes standards and procedures to assure that such uses are compatible with their surroundings and the intent of these regulations. In approving a temporary or intermittent use, the Director may establish requirements related to, but not limited to, days and hours of operation, parking, temporary structures, and site planning, in addition to performance standards specified below. The Director shall determine the extent to which any permanent on-site parking and other facilities may satisfy the requirements for the proposed use. The Director may refer any proposed temporary or intermittent use to an administrative hearing or to the Planning Commission for action. B. Definitions. A temporary use is one which is established at a particular location for less than one year. An intermittent use is one which occurs no more than 90 days in a year, but which may continue from year-to-year. C. Specific cases: 1. Real Estate Sales Office in Tract. A temporary real estate sales office may be established in a residential development for the initial sale of property in that development, upon written approval by the Director. Such an office may be located within a residence or a common or temporary building. If a temporary building is used, it shall be removed upon termination of the use. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 6 2. Mobile Home as Construction Office. a. A mobile home may be used as a temporary office at a construction site for not more than six months upon written approval of the Chief Building Official subject to any conditions he deems necessary to protect health, safety, and welfare. Upon written request received prior to expiration, the use may be continued for six-month periods, not to exceed a total of eighteen months, by the Chief Building Official. b. An administrative use permit is required to allow a mobile home as a temporary construction office when the mobile home is not located on the same property as the construction site. The same time limitations as stipulated above for an on-site mobile home would apply, with approvals for extensions of the use made by the Director. Also with the Chief Building Official's or Director's approval, the mobile home may be occupied by a resident guard or caretaker, provided it is properly connected to city utilities or other safe means of waste disposal is assured. 3. Mobile Home as Temporary Residence at Building Site. Upon written approval by the Chief Building Official, a mobile home, trailer or recreational vehicle may be parked on a lot and occupied by the lot owner while he/she is building a dwelling on the lot for his/her own occupancy. The mobile home or vehicle shall be connected to the city sewer system or shall be self-contained, with disposal contracted for. Approval shall be for renewable six-month intervals, not to exceed a total of 18 months. 4. Recreational vehicle as temporary dwelling. A recreational vehicle may be parked in a residential parking space or driveway for periods not to exceed seven days, for the purpose of housing guests of on-site residents only. Such recreational vehicle shall not be parked so as to prevent residents of any other dwellings on the site from using their assigned parking spaces, nor shall it discharge waste or sewage into the city's sewage system. No hose, electrical cord, pipe, wire, or other device extending from the vehicle may be permitted to encroach on any access easement or sidewalk. 5. Construction Activities. Construction and demolition, including fabrication of building components and other activities normally associated with property development and maintenance, may be conducted in any zone, provided they are pursued according to plans and procedures approved by the Chief Building Official. 6. Educational Conferences. Student housing complexes normally occupied for part of the year may be used during their vacant periods for educational conferences provided an administrative use permit is approved by the Director. The occupancy of such facilities during educational conferences shall not exceed the maximum established by any prior City approval for residential occupancy. 7. Parades, Carnivals, Fairs, Festivals. Use of privately owned property for parades, carnivals, fairs, and festivals requires approval of an administrative use permit. Where these events involve public property, coordination with the City Clerk's Office is required. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 7 8. Other Temporary or Intermittent Uses. Upon approval of an administrative use permit, the Director may approve other temporary or intermittent uses, including but not limited to: musical events, auctions, estate sales, clothing outlet sales, nonprofit benefits, parking lot sales, and car shows. 17.08.020 Outdoor sales. A. Sales of Christmas Trees and Other Agricultural Products. Upon written approval by the Director, premises within non-residential zones may be used for the sale of Christmas trees, pumpkins, flowers, or seasonal produce, subject to the following requirements and any other conditions that the Director deems necessary: 1. Sales shall be limited to Christmas trees, pumpkins, or seasonal produce and related accessory items only, as specified in the letter of approval. 2. Sales of Christmas trees shall not be conducted before Thanksgiving or after December 26. The duration of pumpkin and seasonal produce sales shall be subject to Director approval. 3. The site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. All sales items, sales equipment, temporary power poles, other temporary structures, and signage shall be kept behind a 10-foot setback from all street rights-of-way and they shall be removed within 10 days after the close of the sale. Trash and recycling receptacles shall be provided in a convenient location for customers. 4. A camper or trailer for overnight security may be parked on-site, for the duration of the permit, if kept more than 10 feet back from the street right-of-way. 5. A sign permit shall be obtained for any proposed signage. Maximum sign area shall not exceed 32 square feet. No bunting strips, banners, flags, whirligigs, or other attention-getting devices shall be displayed on site without Director approval. 6. When the use is temporary or intermittent, the applicant may be required to post a refundable deposit, set by the Community Development Director, with the Community Development Department to assure site clean-up, if necessary. Deposit shall be in the form of a cashier's check and shall be made prior to occupying the site. 7. Outdoor sales lots are subject to all fire safety measures, including location of fire extinguishers, as required by the Fire Marshal. 8. Any Christmas trees sold for use in public facilities shall be flame-proofed with a state Fire Marshal-approved material by a state-licensed application. 9. Applicant shall obtain a City business tax certificate. A copy of the Director's approval and the business tax certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous location at all times when the use is in operation. 10. The applicant shall secure a building permit for any structure requiring a permit, associated with the use. The plan shall show the proposed vehicular circulation pattern, parking layout, and location of structures. Plans shall also demonstrate compliance with Title 24 requirements for handicap accessibility. 11. The use shall comply with all requirements of the County Health Department. 12. Restroom facilities shall be provided either on-site or on a nearby property, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official. 13. No sales or display shall take place in the public right-of-way. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 8 14. Upon written receipt of complaints from the public or the Police Department, the Director's approval may be scheduled for administrative hearing review. At the public hearing, the Hearing Officer may add, delete, or modify conditions of approval, or may revoke the approval. B. Other outdoor sales. Outdoor sales of nonagricultural products, such as food carts, barbecues, and swap meets shall be limited to the types of retail sales allowed in the location's zone. "Outdoor sales" may be temporary, intermittent, or permanent. "Outdoor sales" do not include incidental outdoor display of merchandise associated with a business occupying a building on the site, nor sale of things usually sold outdoors, such as boats, vehicles, and building or landscape materials. (See also Chapter 5.16 - Solicitors and Peddlers and Chapter 5.48 - Sales on Streets and Sidewalks.) 1. Other outdoor sales require approval of an administrative use permit, except in cases where the Director determines a Planning Commission use permit would be more appropriate. Parking requirements, setbacks to sales or storage areas, safety and aesthetic screening, and other development standards usually related to buildings shall be established by use permit approval. 17.08.030 Service stations. Service stations are permitted as specified in the zone district regulations, subject to the following conditions: A. Premises adjoining residential zones shall be screened from such zones by a six-foot-high landscaped visual barrier, subject to the limitations of Section 17.16.050, Fences, walls and hedges. B. Street frontage between driveways shall have a low wall or other landscape barrier to prevent vehicles from being driven or parked on the sidewalk. C. Bells or other sound signals shall be turned off between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. if the station is adjacent to a residential zone. D. Pump islands shall be located at least 15 feet from any street right-of-way line or setback line, except that cantilevered roofs may extend to a point at least five feet from such lines. E. Repair work shall be done and dismantled vehicles shall be stored inside a building or area screened so that it is not visible from off the premises. (See also Chapter 17.18, Performance Standards and Section 5.36.020, SERVICE STATIONS, Alcoholic beverages - Sale prohibited - Exceptions.) (Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987; Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.1(C)) 17.08.040 Concurrent sales of motor fuel and alcoholic beverages. Concurrent sales of motor fuel and alcoholic beverages at a service station other than beer or wine are prohibited. The concurrent sales of motor fuel and beer or wine at a service station shall be subject to the approval of an Administrative Use Permit and the following: A. There shall be no sales of beer or wine for on-site consumption; B. Beer or wine may be sold only in conjunction with selling groceries and other sundries and convenience items; C. There shall be no advertisement or display of beer or wine visible from off the premises; City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 9 D. No beer or wine shall be displayed within 5 feet of the cash register or front door; E. No advertisement of beer or wine shall be displayed at motor fuel islands and no self-illuminating advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings or windows; F. No sales of beer or wine shall be made from a drive-in window; G. No display or sales of beer or wine shall be made from an ice tub. H. Employees on duty between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. who sell beer or wine shall be at least 21 years of age. I. For purposes of this section, “concurrent sales of motor fuel and beer or wine” shall mean the ability to purchase motor fuel and beer or wine at the same time or at the same place. More specifically, a service station that permits a customer to pay for motor fuel and beer or wine: 1) at the same location, or 2) utilizing a single financial transaction, is engaging in concurrent sales of motor fuel and beer or wine and shall be subject to this ordinance. J. In order to grant approval of a Use Permit, the Hearing Officer must make the following findings in addition to findings contained in Section 17.58.040: 1. The establishment of concurrent sales of motor fuel and beer or wine is consistent with the provisions of the Business and Professions Code Section 23790.5. 2. The sale of beer or wine at this location does not jeopardize the public health, safety or welfare, e.g., will not result in an over concentration of businesses selling or serving alcoholic beverages within the vicinity. 3. The sale of beer or wine at a service station is otherwise allowed within the same zoning district at this location and the sale of beer or wine concurrent with motor fuel would not result in the expansion of a non-conforming use. (Prior Code Ord. 1124 – 1 Ex. A (part), 1988; Ord. 1446 (2004 Series) updated) 17.08.050 Vending machines. A. A "vending machine" is a device which dispenses a product or service, either for sale or for free, and which is activated entirely by the receiver of the product or service, including ice machines, cigarette machines, food vending machines, and newspaper racks and the like. Vending machine does not include a motor fuel pump. B. Indoor vending machines are accessory to allowed uses. Outdoor vending machines are allowed in all commercial ("C") zones. 1. Vending machines shall be located along the face of a building or against a structure designed to accommodate them; 2. They shall be visible from access drives or public streets; 3. They shall occupy not more than 10% the length of the wall facing the street or access drive, or twenty feet, whichever is less; 4. They shall not obstruct private pedestrian walkways; a minimum of 44 inches shall be kept clear of obstructions, or more if pedestrian traffic volume warrants. They are not allowed on public sidewalks. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.1(H)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 10 17.08.060 Electronic game amusement centers. During the processing of the required use permit for an electronic game amusement center (see Section 17.100, Definitions), the appropriateness of the proposed location and possible land use conflicts created by the use shall be evaluated. All electronic game amusement centers (hereinafter referred to in this section as "centers") shall be licensed in accordance with Chapter 5.52 of this code and shall comply with the following requirements and restrictions: A. Centers shall comply with all applicable laws and conditions of use permit approval; B. No center shall be allowed: 1. Within 1,000 feet of the exterior limits of any public or private elementary school, junior high school of high school; 2. Within 500 feet of the exterior limits of a PF district or any district where residential use is the principal permitted use; 3. Within 500 feet of the exterior limits of any premises whereon the principal business is the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, including, but not limited to, bars, taverns and liquor stores; 4. Within 1,000 feet of the exterior limits of any other premises occupied by another center. C. No person under 18 years of age may enter, be or remain in a center during such time as the San Luis Coastal Unified School District is conducting its regular daytime education program; D. Centers shall have at least one responsible adult supervisor on duty at all times whose primary responsibility shall be supervision of electronic game play; E. Noise attenuation measures shall be taken as required by conditions of use permit approval; F. No person under 18 years of age may play electronic games at a center located at a place of business where alcoholic beverages are sold, served or consumed; G. Bicycle racks shall be provided within a reasonable distance of any center and shall provide at least one bicycle stall for each electronic game in the center. H. Centers shall be closed from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. and for such times as required by conditions of the use permit; I. Adequate space shall be provided for each electronic game so as to allow its use without overcrowding; J. Parking shall be as required by the use permit for a center. (Ord. 946 - 1 (part), 1983: prior code - 4953) K. Facility and operation exceptions. Exceptions to any of the requirements listed in this section may be considered during the use permit review process provided the following findings can be made: City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 11 1. The requested exception to the facility and operation requirements will not affect the ability of the electronic game amusement center to be compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The requested exception to the facility and operation requirements will not encourage school-age children from frequenting the electronic game amusement center while the San Luis Coastal Unified School District is conducting its regular daytime education program. 3. The purpose and intent of the facility and operation requirements are still met with the approval of the requested exception. (Ord. 1128 - 1 Ex. (part), 1988) 17.08.070 Mineral extraction. Commercial mining is prohibited within city limits. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) 17.08.072 Mixed Use Projects This Section provides standards for the design of mixed use projects. A. Design considerations. A mixed use project shall be designed to achieve the following objectives. 1. The design shall provide for internal compatibility between the different uses. 2. Potential noise, odors, glare, pedestrian traffic, and other potentially significant impacts on residents shall be minimized to allow a compatible mix of residential and nonresidential uses on the same site. 3. The design of the mixed use project shall take into consideration potential impacts on adjacent properties and shall include specific design features to minimize potential impacts. 4. The design of a mixed use project shall ensure that the residential units are of a residential character, and that privacy between residential units and between other uses on the site is maximized. 5. The design of the structures and site planning shall encourage integration of the street pedestrian environment with the nonresidential uses through the use of plazas, courtyards, walkways, and street furniture. 6. Site planning and building design shall be compatible with and enhance the adjacent and surrounding residential neighborhood in terms of scale, building design, color, exterior materials, roof styles, lighting, landscaping, and signage. B. Mix of uses. A mixed use project may combine residential units with any other use, or combination of uses allowed in the applicable zoning district by Section 17.22.010; provided that where a mixed use project is proposed with a use required by Section 17.22.010 to have Use Permit approval in the applicable zoning district, the entire mixed use project shall be subject to that permit requirement. C. Maximum density. The residential component of a mixed use project shall comply with the maximum density requirements of the applicable zoning district; except that the residential component of a mixed use project in the C-S or M zoning districts shall not exceed 24 density units per net acre. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 12 D. Site layout and project design standards. Each proposed mixed use project shall comply with the property development standards of the applicable zoning district, and the following requirements. 1. Location of units. Residential units shall not occupy ground floor space within the first 50 feet of floor area measured from each building face adjacent to a street, or any ground floor space in the CD zoning district. 2. Loading areas. Commercial loading areas shall be located as far as possible from residential units and shall be screened from view from the residential portion of the project to the extent feasible. 3. Refuse and recycling areas. Areas for the collection and storage of refuse and recyclable materials shall be located on the site in locations that are convenient for both the residential and non-residential uses. E. Performance standards. 1. Lighting. Lighting for the commercial uses shall be appropriately shielded to not negatively impact the residential units. 2. Noise. All residential units shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts from non- residential project noise, in compliance with the City's noise regulations. 3. Hours of operation. A mixed-use project proposing a commercial component that will operate outside of the hours from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. shall require the Director's approval to ensure that the commercial use will not negatively impact the residential uses within the project. F. Requirements for Use Permit projects. A mixed use project that requires Use Permit approval in compliance with Subsection B., or that is located in the C-S or M zoning districts is subject to the following requirements. 1. Property development standards. The approval of a Use Permit for a mixed use project may include: a. Conditions of approval that require provisions and standards in addition to, or instead of the property development standards of the applicable zoning district to ensure the compatibility of uses and surroundings; or b. Less restrictive standards than required by the applicable zoning district, to the extent allowed by Use Permit approval in other sections of these regulations, to make particular use combinations more feasible. 2. Mandatory findings for approval. The approval of a Use Permit for a mixed use project shall require that the review authority first make all of the following findings, as applicable. a. The projects mixed uses are consistent with the general plan and are compatible with their surroundings, with neighboring uses, and with each other; b. The projects design protects the public health, safety, and welfare; and c. The mixed uses provide greater public benefits than single-use development of the site. This finding must enumerate those benefits, such as proximity of workplaces and housing, automobile trip reduction, provision of affordable housing, or other benefits consistent with the purposes of this Section. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 13 3. Mandatory findings for more restrictive standards. To require property development standards more restrictive than those of the underlying zone, the review authority must make one of the following findings: a. Site-specific property development standards are needed to protect all proposed uses of the site, in particular residential uses; or b. Site-specific property development standards are needed to make the project consistent with the intent of these regulations; or c. The preponderance of the development proposed for the site is of a type not normally permitted in the underlying zone, so property development standards for the zone where such development is normally found are appropriate. 17.08.080 Public utilities. A. Distribution facilities may be located in any zone; provided, that equipment on the ground in residential zones shall be screened by landscaped visual barriers. B. Transmission lines may be located in any zone, provided the route is approved by the Planning Commission. C. Other unmanned public utility structures may be located in any zone, provided an administrative use permit is approved by the Director. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.1(E)) 17.08.090 Home occupation. A. Intent. The provisions set forth in this section are intended to allow the conduct of home enterprises that are incidental to and compatible with surrounding residential uses. A "home occupation" is gainful employment engaged in by the occupants of a dwelling. B. Permit Required. 1. The conduct of home occupation requires the approval of a home occupation permit by the Director, who may establish additional conditions to further the intent of this section. A permit is required when a person does business in his/her home, uses his/her home address as a business address on business tax certificates, or uses his/her phone as a business phone. Home occupations may be conducted from dwellings located in residential zones or from dwellings located in commercial zones where dwellings are an allowed or conditionally allowed use. A public notice shall be posted at the site of each proposed home occupation. If anyone informs the Community Development Department of a question or objection concerning the proposed home occupation within five days of the posting, the Director shall schedule a hearing for the application as provided for administrative use permits. If no questions or objections are received by the Community Development Department within five days after posting, the Director may issue the permit upon submission of all required information and without further notice or public hearing. 2. State licensed child day care centers for six or fewer children are exempt from home occupation regulations (see state Health and Safety Code, Section 1529.5). City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 14 C. General Requirements. 1. Home occupations shall not involve frequent customer access or have other characteristics which would reduce residents' enjoyment of their neighborhoods. The peace and quiet of residential areas shall be maintained. 2. Activities shall be conducted entirely within the dwelling unit or an enclosed accessory building, and shall not alter the appearance of such structures. (Horticultural activities may be conducted outdoors.) 3. There shall be no sales, rental or display on the premises. 4. There shall be no signs other than address and names of residents. 5. There shall be no advertising the home occupation by street address except that street address may be included on business cards and business correspondence originating from the home. 6. No vehicle larger than a three-quarter-ton truck may be used in connection with a home occupation. 7. The home occupation shall not encroach on any required parking, yard or open space area. 8. Parking for vehicles used in connection with the home occupation shall be provided in addition to parking required for the residence. 9. Activities conducted and equipment or materials used shall not change the fire safety or occupancy classifications of the premises, nor use utilities in amounts greater than normally provided for residential use. 10. No use shall create or cause noise, dust, vibration, smell, smoke, glare, or electrical interference, or other hazard or nuisance. 11. No employees other than residents of the dwelling shall be allowed. (Babysitters or domestic servants are not considered employees of a home occupation.) 12. Clients or customers shall not visit the home occupation between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 13. If the home occupation is to be conducted in rental property, the property owner's authorization for the proposed use shall be obtained. D. Prohibited Uses. The following uses by their operation or nature may interfere with residential welfare and diminish the convenience intended for commercial zones, and therefore shall not be permitted as home occupations: 1. Automotive repair (body or mechanical), or detailing, upholstery or painting of automobiles, when performed on the same site as the home occupation. Off-site work is permitted. 2. Barber or beauty shop; 3. Carpentry or cabinet making; 4. Welding or machining; 5. Medical offices, clinics, laboratories, except that counseling is permitted, when no more than one client visit or group session is held at one time; 6. Appliance, radio or television repair; 7. Print shop; City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 15 8. Gun or ammunition sales, including by mail order. (Ord. 1102 - 1 Ex. A(4), 1987; Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.1(D)) 17.08.095 Convenience Stores. A. Intent. The standards in this section are intended to assure that neighborhood markets will serve persons who live or work in nearby neighborhoods, and who will normally not need an automobile to get to the market. The standards should ensure that such markets offer adequate food and supplies to attract customers who would otherwise drive to a large supermarket. Limits on hours and alcohol sales and other provisions will prevent such stores from becoming a nuisance to the neighborhood. B. Standards. The following standards shall apply to all neighborhood grocery markets. 1. Maximum Size. Gross floor area shall not exceed 3,000 square feet per business. Floor area for any accessory residential use shall not be counted toward the allowed market floor area. 2. Height, Setback, and Lot Coverage. Neighborhood grocery markets shall comply with the height, setback, and coverage requirements for the underlying zone, except that markets in residential zones shall comply with standards for the C-N zone. 3. Loading and Deliveries. One curbside or off-street loading space shall be provided per business. Loading and deliveries is permitted only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. 4. Hours of Operation. Neighborhood grocery markets shall open for business no earlier than 7:30 a.m., and shall close no later than 10:00 p.m. 5. Alcohol Sales. Neighborhood grocery markets within residential zones shall be prohibited from selling alcoholic beverages of any kind. 6. Performance Standards. Neighborhood grocery markets shall comply with Performance Standards, Chapter 17.18 of the Zoning Regulations. In addition, all exterior trash enclosures, outdoor storage, heating or cooling equipment, refrigerators, and similar equipment shall be visually screened, and located and/or designed to avoid noise, odor, glare, or vibration impacts to neighboring properties. 7. Architectural Review. Neighborhood grocery markets shall be compatible with neighboring structures in terms of scale, massing, architectural style or character, colors and materials, access, exterior lighting and landscaping. Exterior changes shall require architectural review, as provided in Chapter 2.48 of the Municipal Code. 17.08.100 Child and Adult Day Care A. Intent. The provisions set forth in this section are intended to enable child and adult day care opportunities throughout the city, to ensure that day care facilities will be compatible with residential uses, and to comply with applicable sections of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. B. Permits Required. 1. Adult day care facilities serving six or fewer clients on site at one time and small family day care homes for eight or fewer children are considered residential uses for the purposes of zoning regulation. They may be established in all zones where dwellings are allowed. No use permit is required. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 16 2. Adult day care facilities serving seven to 12 clients on site at one time and large family day care homes for children may be established in any zone where dwellings are allowed, subject to performance standards listed below. These facilities require written approval by the Community Development Director, consistent with the following review procedures: (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) a. Public Notice. Mailed notice of the proposed use shall be given to all property owners within no more than a 100-foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the proposed facility site, no fewer than 10 days prior to the Director's action to approve or deny an application for a day care facility serving seven to 12 adults or nine to 14 children. If no written request for hearing is received by the Community Development Department within 10 days from the mailing of these notices, the Director may approve the requested use upon submission of all required information and without further notice or public hearing. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) b. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be required if requested in writing by the applicant or any other affected person. c. Approval. The Director is authorized to approve day care facilities serving seven to 12 adults or nine to 14 children, subject to the appeal provisions of Chapter 17.66 of this Title. In accordance with applicable sections of the California Health and Safety Code, the Director shall approve the use when he or she determines that the proposed facility: (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) i. complies with all applicable provisions of the Fire Code regarding health and safety; and ii. complies with property development standards contained in Chapter 17.16 of this Title and with City sign regulations; and iii. has been issued a day care license from the State of California, Department of Social Services; and iv. will satisfy performance standards of this section relating to noise, traffic, and parking. 3. Day care facilities serving more than 12 adults or more than 14 children require approval of an administrative use permit where not otherwise allowed or prohibited, consistent with Section 17.22.010 Uses Allowed by Zone and Section 17.58 Use Permits. These facilities are subject to the performance standards outlined below. C. Performance standards for day care facilities serving more than six adults or more than eight children. 1. Noise. The day care facility shall be subject to all applicable provisions of the Noise Ordinance (Chapter 9.12 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code). Where the day care facility is adjacent to housing in a residential zone, outdoor play and activities shall be prohibited prior to 9:00 a.m. 2. Traffic. Designated delivery and pick-up areas shall not pose any traffic or safety hazards. Operators of day care facilities shall provide carpool-matching services to all clients. 3. Parking. a. Day care facilities with seven to 12 adults or nine to 14 children, one on-site parking space is required, in addition to parking required for the residence, except when the Director finds that adequate on-street parking exists for dropping off and picking up clients. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 17 b. Day care centers with more than 12 adults or more than 14 children must provide two spaces per facility and one space for each 12 day care clients (based on the facility's license), rounded to the nearest whole number, in addition to any spaces required for the residential use. See Section 17.16.060 of this Title. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) D. Day care as an accessory use. When day care facilities are accessory to another use requiring a permit, only one permit application need be filed and acted on. As accessory uses to schools and churches, and where an employer provides on-site child care to 14 or fewer children for the exclusive use of employees, day care is allowed by right, providing the primary use meets City parking standards. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) E. Exceptions. Nothing in this section shall prohibit applicants from requesting exceptions or variances from the strict interpretation of the Zoning Regulations to the extent allowed by said regulations. The Director may authorize minor exceptions to performance standards upon finding that: 1. The modification is in accordance with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Regulations, and consistent with City day care policy. F. Nonconforming status. All day care facilities licensed by the State at the time of ordinance adoption (1992) shall be considered legal nonconforming uses, consistent with Chapter 17.10 of these regulations, except that nonconforming day care facilities may not be changed to another nonconforming use. (Ord. 1225, 1992) 17.08.110 Homeless Shelters. A. The shelter shall be operated by a responsible agency or organization, with experience in managing or providing social services. B. The shelter shall provide at least one qualified on-site supervisor at all times, plus one additional supervisor for each 10 occupants beyond 20. C. A use permit for a homeless shelter shall not be approved when another homeless shelter exists within one-half mile of the proposed site. D. Nearby R-1 and R-2 neighborhoods shall be adequately buffered from potential impacts of the proposed shelter. 17.08.120 Location of Pool and Pool Equipment. A. A swimming pool shall not be located in a required front or side yard. B. A swimming pool shall not be located within five feet of a property line. C. Pool equipment shall not be located in a required front yard or that portion of side yard located between the front lot line and the rearmost portion of the main building. To minimize the potential impact of noise, equipment shall be located not less than ten feet from any window or other opening into a dwelling or other habitable building on an adjacent property. D. Pool equipment shall be enclosed or screened from street and adjoining property view. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 18 17.08.130 Live/Work and Work/Live Units A. Purpose. This Section provides standards for the development of new live/work and work/live units, and for the reuse of existing commercial and industrial structures to accommodate these units. Live/work and work/live units are intended to be occupied by business operators who live in the same structure that contains the commercial activity or industry. A live/work unit is intended to function predominantly as living space with incidental accommodations for work-related activities that are beyond the scope of a home occupation. A work/live unit is intended to function predominantly as work space with incidental residential accommodations that meet basic habitability requirements. B. Application requirements. In addition to the information and materials required for a Use Permit application by these Zoning regulations, a Use Permit application for a live/work or work/live unit within the CS or M zones shall include a Phase I Environmental Assessment for the site, including an expanded site investigation to determine whether lead based paint and asbestos hazards exist. The purpose of this requirement is to assess whether there are any hazardous or toxic materials on the site that could pose a health risk to residents. If the Phase I assessment shows potential health risks, a Phase 2 Environmental Assessment shall be prepared and submitted to determine if remediation may be required. C. Limitations on use. The non-residential component of a live/work or work/live project shall be a use allowed within the applicable zone by Section 17.22.010 (Uses Allowed by Zones), subject to the following additional limitations. 1. Prohibited uses. A live/work or work/live unit shall not be established or used in conjunction with any of the following activities: 1. Adult businesses; or 2. Vehicle maintenance or repair (e.g., body or mechanical work, including boats and recreational vehicles), vehicle detailing and painting, upholstery, etc.). 2. Live/work unit. A live/work unit shall not be established or used in conjunction with any of the following activities: 1. Storage of flammable liquids or hazardous materials beyond that normally associated with a residential use; 2. Welding, machining, or any open flame work; 3. Any use defined by Section 17.22.020 (Land Use Definitions) as "Manufacturing - Heavy"; and 4. Any other activity or use, as determined by the Director to not be compatible with residential activities and/or to have the possibility of affecting the health or safety of live/work unit residents, because of the potential for the use to create dust, glare, heat, noise, noxious gasses, odor, smoke, traffic, vibration or other impacts, or would be hazardous because of materials, processes, products, or wastes. D. Density. Live/work and work/live units shall comply with the maximum density requirements of the applicable zoning district, except that live/work and work/live units within the C-S or M zones shall not exceed a density of 24 dwelling units per acre. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 19 E. Design standards. 1. Floor area requirements. The minimum net total floor area of a live/work or work/live space shall be 1,000 square feet. No more than 30 percent shall be reserved exclusively for living space. All floor area other than that reserved for living space shall be reserved and regularly used for working space. 2. Separation and access. Each live/work or work/live unit shall be separated from other units and other uses in the structure. Access to each unit shall be provided from common access areas, corridors, or halls; and the access to each unit shall be clearly separate from other live/work or work/live units or other uses within the structure. 3. Facilities to accommodate commercial or industrial activities. A live/work or work/live unit shall be designed to accommodate commercial or industrial uses as evidenced by the provision of ventilation, interior storage, flooring, and other physical improvements of the type commonly found in exclusively commercial or industrial facilities used for the same work activity. 4. Integration of living and working space. Areas within a live/work or work/live unit that are designated as living space shall be an integral part of the live/work or work/live unit and not separated (or occupied and/or rented separately) from the work space, except that mezzanines and lofts may be used as living space subject to compliance with the other provisions of this Section, and living and working space may be separated by interior couryards or similar private space. 5. Mixed occupancy buildings. If a building contains mixed occupancies of live/work or work/live units and other nonresidential uses, occupancies other than live/work or work/live shall meet all applicable requirements for those uses, and proper occupancy separations shall be provided between the live/work or work/live units and other occupancies, as determined by the Chief Building Official. 6. Parking. Each live/work or work/live unit shall be provided at least two off-street parking spaces. The review authority may modify this requirement for the use of existing structures with limited parking. F. Operating requirements. 1. Occupancy. A live/work or work/live unit shall be occupied and used only by the operator of the business within the unit, or a household of which at least one member shall be the business operator. 2. Sale or rental of portions of unit. No portion of a live/work or work/live unit may be separately rented or sold as a commercial space for any person not living in the premises or as a residential space for any person not working in the same unit. 3. Notice to occupants. The owner or developer of any building containing work/live units shall provide written notice to all occupants and users that the surrounding area may be subject to levels of noise, dust, fumes, or other effects associated with commercial and industrial uses at higher levels than would be expected in residential areas. State and Federal health regulations notwithstanding, noise and other standards shall be those applicable to commercial or industrial properties in the applicable zone. 4. Non-resident employees. Up to two persons who do not reside in the live/work or work/live unit may work in the unit unless this employment is prohibited or limited by the Administrative Use Permit. The employment of three or more persons who do not reside in the live/work or work/live unit may be permitted subject to Use Permit approval, based on additional findings that the employment will not adversely affect traffic and parking conditions in the site vicinity. The employment of any persons who do not reside in the live/work or work/live unit shall comply with all applicable Building Code requirements. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 20 5. Client and customer visits. Client and customer visits to live/work or work/live units are permitted subject to any applicable conditions of the applicable Administrative Use Permit or Use Permit, to ensure compatibility with adjacent commercial or industrial uses, or adjacent residentially-zoned areas or uses. G. Changes in use. After approval, a live/work or work/live unit shall not be converted to entirely residential use unless authorized through Administrative Use Permit approval. Administrative Use Permit approval shall require that the Director first find that the exclusively residential use will not impair the ability of non-residential uses on and adjacent to the site to continue operating because of potential health or safety concerns or nuisance complaints raised by the exclusively residential use and/or its occupants. H. Required findings. The approval of live/work or work/live unit shall require that the review authority first make all of the following findings, in addition to all findings required for Administrative Use Permit or Use Permit approval. 1. The proposed use of each live/work or work/live unit is a bona fide commercial or industrial activity consistent with Subsection C. (Limitations on use). 2. The establishment of live/work or work/live units will not conflict with nor inhibit industrial or commercial uses in the area where the project is proposed; 3. The building containing live/work or work/live units and each live/work or work/live unit within the building has been designed to ensure that they will function predominantly as work spaces with incidental residential accommodations meeting basic habitability requirements in compliance with applicable regulations; and 4. Any changes proposed to the exterior appearance of the building will be compatible with adjacent commercial or industrial uses where all adjacent land is zoned for commercial or industrial uses. If there is adjacent residentially-zoned land, the proposed changes to the building will make the commercial or industrial building being converted more compatible with the adjacent residential area. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 21 Chapter 17.10: NONCONFORMING USES Sections: 17.10.010 Intent. 17.10.020 Regulations. 17.10.010 Intent. A nonconforming use is one which was legally established on the effective date of applicable sections of these regulations, but which is not now an allowed or conditionally allowed use in the zone in which it is located. The intent of these regulations is to prevent the expansion of nonconforming uses, establish the circumstances under which they may be continued, and provide for their removal or change to a conforming use as soon as practical. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.2(A)) 17.10.020 Regulations. A. Change of ownership, tenancy or management of a nonconforming use shall not affect its legal, nonconforming status. B. A nonconforming use may be continued and a nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use provided: 1. A nonconforming use which ceases for a continuous period of six months shall lose its nonconforming status and the premises on which the nonconforming use was located shall from then on be used for conforming uses. 2. A nonconforming use may be replaced with another, provided that an administrative use permit is approved by the Director. The Director must find that the new use has similar or less severe impacts on its surroundings in terms of noise, traffic, parking demand, hours of operation and visual incompatibility. The applicant shall submit evidence of the date when the original nonconforming use was established. 3. A nonconforming single-family dwelling may be continued without limitation by this Section, and if involuntarily damaged or destroyed, may be reconstructed or replaced with a new structure with the same footprint and height, in compliance with current California Building Standards Code requirements. C. A lot occupied by a nonconforming use may be further developed by the addition of conforming uses and structures, provided an administrative use permit is approved. (See Sections 17.58.020 through 17.58.080.) (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.2(B)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 22 Chapter 17.12: NONCONFORMING LOTS Sections: 17.12.010 Intent. 17.12.020 Regulations. 17.12.010 Intent. A lot having less area, width, depth or frontage than required by the Subdivision Regulations, as set forth in Title 16 of this code, for the zone in which it is located, but which was lawfully created prior to the effective date of regulations requiring such greater area or dimension, shall be considered a nonconforming lot. These regulations are intended to provide for the reasonable use of such nonconforming lots, consistent with other standards adopted to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.3(A)) 17.12.020 Regulations. A. If a nonconforming lot has been held in common ownership with any contiguous property at any time since November 18, 1977, and it otherwise meets the requirements for parcel merger under Government Code Section 66451.11, it may not be individually developed. The area within such a lot may be developed only after it has been merged with contiguous property, or otherwise re-subdivided in conjunction with the contiguous property to create one or more conforming parcels or one parcel which more nearly conforms. (Ord. 1346 (1999 Series) An exception to the above merger requirement may be requested through an administrative use permit. To approve the use permit, the Director must find that retention of the property line(s) will not adversely impact neighborhood character. Factors that assure that neighborhood character is maintained include: 1. The regular spacing of buildings on the affected lots, when viewed from the street, is consistent with other developed properties within the same block; 2. Convenient and conforming access and parking is available to serve site uses. B. In an R-1 or R-2 zone, the merger or re-subdivision requirement set forth in the first paragraph of this subsection shall not apply to a nonconforming lot and contiguous commonly owned property where each of the parcels has an area, width, depth and frontage equal to at least 80% of the minimum required in the Subdivision Regulations (Title 16 of this code). C. If a nonconforming lot has not been held in common ownership with any contiguous property since November 18, 1977, it may be individually developed. D. Property development standards shall apply to nonconforming lots, except that the density standards shall not prevent construction of a single dwelling unit where otherwise permitted by this chapter (see Section 17.16.010, Density). (Ord. 1102 - 1 Ex. A(5), 1987; Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987; Ord, 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.3(B)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 23 Chapter 17.14: NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES Sections: 17.14.010 Intent. 17.14.020 Regulations. 17.14.010 Intent. A structure which lawfully existed on the effective date of applicable sections of the ordinance codified in this division, but which does not comply with one or more of the property development standards for the zone in which it is located, is a "nonconforming structure." This chapter is intended to provide for the correction or removal of such structures as soon as practical. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.4(A)) 17.14.020 Regulations. A. A nonconforming structure that is damaged to an extent of one-half or more of its replacement cost immediately prior to such damage may be restored only if made to conform. However, multifamily residences in some zones may be allowed to be restored at the original density and size, even if the density and size do not conform to current regulations (see Section 17.16.010E). (Ord. 1346 (1999 Series)) B. Changes to interior partitions or other nonstructural improvements and repairs may be made to a nonconforming building to the extent of not more than one-half its replacement cost over any five-year period. C. Subject to the valuation limit in subsection B of this section, structural elements may be modified where the Chief Building Official determines such modification is immediately necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the nonconforming structure or adjacent properties. D. Replacement cost shall be determined by the Chief Building Official, whose decision may be appealed to the Council. E. Exceptions to this chapter may be granted by the Director for historic structures designated as such in any list or plan element adopted by the City. F. Exceptions to this chapter may be granted to allow minor conforming additions to nonconforming structures occupied by conforming uses, subject to a finding of consistency with the intent of this chapter. 1. Additions of 150 square feet of gross floor area or less to single or duplex dwellings may be approved by the Director without public hearing. 2. Other additions to residential structures and additions to nonresidential structures may be allowed upon approval of a use permit by the Director. 3. The value of additions allowed pursuant to subdivisions 1 and 2 of this subsection shall be excluded from calculation of replacement cost of the nonconforming structure. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.4(B)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 24 Chapter 17.16: PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Sections: 17.16.005 Applicability of other provisions. 17.16.010 Density. 17.16.015 Recreational vehicles as dwelling unit. 17.16.020 Yards. 17.16.025 Creek setbacks. 17.16.030 Coverage. 17.16.040 Height. 17.16.050 Fences, walls and hedges. 17.16.060 Parking space requirements. 17.16.070 Parking and driveway design and exceptions. 17.16.090 Screening of outdoor sales and storage. 17.16.100 Utility services. 17.16.110 Satellite dish antenna. 17.16.120 Wireless telecommunication facilities. 17.16.005 Applicability of other provisions. A. Development of property within the city may be subject to provisions of this code not contained in this section or chapter, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Fire Prevention Code, Chapter 15.08; 2. Building Regulations, Chapter 15.04; 3. Demolition and Moving of Buildings, Chapter 15.36; 4. Subdivision Regulations, Title 16; 5. Building Setback Line (plan line), Chapter 17.74; 6. Street Right-of-Way Dedication and Improvement, Chapter 17.76; 7. Grading Regulations, Section 15.04.040; 8. Architectural Review Commission, Chapter 2.48; 9. General Plan Amendment Regulations, Chapter 17.80; 10. Sign Regulations, Chapter 15.40; 11. Condominium Development and Conversion Regulations, Chapter 17.82; 12. Flood Damage Prevention Regulations, Chapter 17.84; 13. Downtown Housing Conversion Permits, Chapter 17.86; 14. Growth Management Regulations, Chapter 17.88; 15. Resource Deficiency, Chapter 2.44; City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 25 16. Environmental Review Guidelines, adopted by Council Resolution 3919-1979; 17. Affordable Housing Incentives, Chapter 17.90; 18. On-Shore Support Facilities, Chapter 17.92; 19. Development Agreements, Chapter 17.94 B. Where provisions of this chapter conflict with provisions of other applicable laws, the more restrictive provision shall prevail. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: prior code - 9202.5(A)) 17.16.010 Density. A. Determination of Allowed Development. 1. "Density" is the number of dwellings per net acre, measured in density units. In the AG, C/OS and R-1 zones, each dwelling counts as one density unit. In the other zones, different size dwellings have density unit values as follows: (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) a. Studio apartment, 0.50 unit; b. One-bedroom dwelling, 0.66 unit; c. Two-bedroom dwelling, 1.00 unit; d. Three-bedroom dwelling, 1.50 units; e. Dwelling with four or more bedrooms, 2.00 units. 2. The following procedure shall be used to determine the maximum development allowed on a given lot or land area: a. Determine the Average Cross-slope of the Site. "Average cross-slope" is the ratio, expressed as a percentage of the difference in elevation to the horizontal distance between two points on the perimeter of the area for which slope is being determined. The line along which the slope is measured shall run essentially perpendicular to the contours. i. Where a site does not slope uniformly, average cross-slope is to be determined by proportional weighting of the cross-slopes of uniformly sloping sub-areas, as determined by the Community Development Director. ii. Cross-slope determinations shall be based on the existing topography of the net site area after accounting for any approved on-site grading necessary to accommodate right-of-way improvements, and before grading for other proposed on-site improvements. iii. Cross-slope shall be calculated only for the net area as defined in Sub-section A2b below. iv. When the calculation of cross slope results in a fractional number, it shall be rounded to the next highest whole number if the fraction is one-half or more; otherwise it shall be rounded down to the next lowest whole number. v. No slope-rated density reduction is required in the C/OS, C-R, C-C or PF zones. vi. The maximum development allowed for each average cross-slope category is as follows: City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 26 Table 1: Maximum Residential Density For Cross-Slope Categories By approving an administrative use permit, the Director may grant exceptions to the reduction of density with slope where the parcel in question is essentially surrounded by development at least as dense as the proposed development. The exception shall not authorize density greater than that allowed for the category of less than 15% slope for the appropriate zone. (See also Section 17.12.020D, Nonconforming Lots - Regulations.) b. Determine the Net Area of the Site. "Net area" is all the area within the property lines of the development site, excluding the following: 1. Street right-of-way dedicated to the City; 2. Area between the tops of banks of creeks shown on the Open Space Element “Creeks Map”; 3. Habitat occupied by species listed as “endangered” or “threatened” by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the California Department of Fish and Game, or as “plants of highest priority” by the California Native Plant Society; 4. Area within the drip line of “heritage trees” designated by the City. c. Multiply the resulting area (in whole and fractional acres) by the maximum density allowed (in density units per acre) according to Table 1 of this section. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) d. The resulting number (in density units, carried out to the nearest one-hundredth unit) will be the maximum residential development potential. Any combination of dwelling types and numbers may be developed, so long as their combined density unit values do not exceed the maximum potential. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) B. Density Transfer. 1. Development potential may be transferred within the area covered by a planned development (PD) zone, in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 17.50. 2. Where a portion of a lot is within a zone or zones that allow residential use and the rest of the lot is in a C/OS zone, and the portion within the C/OS zone is not large enough to allow one dwelling, the fractional dwelling unit potential from the C/OS zone may be transferred to the other portion of the lot, without planned development rezoning. C. Density Averaging. Where portions of a lot are within two or more different zones that allow different maximum densities, and any portion is not of the size required for a lot in that zone, density may be averaged over the whole lot, with each portion contributing to the overall maximum development potential in proportion to its area and maximum allowed density. Average Cross-Slope in % Maximum Density Allowed (density units per net acre) R-1 R-2, O, C-N, C-T R-3 R-4 C-R, C-D, C-C C-S, MU, M-MU 0-15 7 12 18 24 36 24 16-20 4 6 9 12 36 24 21-25 2 4 6 8 36 24 26+ 1 2 3 4 36 24 City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 27 D. Density Bonus for Low-income and Moderate-income Housing. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65915, the City may negotiate a density bonus or other benefits in exchange for provision of housing affordable to households with low or moderate income, as defined in the Government Code, and as stipulated in Chapter 17.90 of these regulations. (Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987; Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(B)) E. Exceptions for Multifamily Dwellings Rebuilt After Involuntarily Destroyed. Multifamily residences in R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, O, C-N, C-C, C-R, C-T and C/OS zones, which have been involuntarily damaged or destroyed by fire, other catastrophic event, or the public enemy by more than 50% of their pre-damaged value, may be rebuilt at the same density and up to the same size, under the following circumstances: 1. All construction must conform to current building codes, zoning regulations, and architectural guidelines, except that the previously existing number of dwelling units and size of buildings will be allowed. 2. A building permit for the replacement structure(s) must be obtained within three years of the date of the damage or destruction. 3. Notwithstanding the above provisions, application for replacement structures of the same density and size may be denied if the Community Development Director makes one of the following findings: a. The reconstruction, restoration, or rebuilding will be detrimental or injurious to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons living or working in the neighborhood. b. The reconstruction, restoration, or rebuilding will be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. c. The existing nonconforming use of the building or structure would be more appropriately moved to a zone in which the use is permitted. d. There no longer exists a zone in which the existing nonconforming use is permitted. (Ord. 1346 (1999 Series)) 17.16.015 Recreational vehicle as dwelling unit. No recreational vehicle, camper shell or similar device shall be used for living or sleeping quarters except in a lawfully operated mobile home park, travel trailer park, or campground, except as provided in M.C. section 17.08.010.C.4. et seq. 17.16.020 Yards. A. Definitions and Purpose. 1. A "yard" is an area along a property line within which no structures, parking spaces or parking backup spaces may be located, except as otherwise provided in these regulations. Yards are intended to help determine the pattern of building masses and open areas within neighborhoods. They also provide separation between combustible materials in neighboring buildings. Yards are further intended to help provide landscape beauty, air circulation, views and exposure to sunlight for both natural illumination and use of solar energy. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 28 2. These regulations provide for two types of yards: a. "Street yard" means a yard adjacent to a local street, State highway, or adopted setback line. Frontages on Highway 101 are not street yards. b. An "other yard" is any yard other than a street yard. B. Measurement of Yards. 1. Street yards shall be measured from the right-of-way line or adopted setback line to the nearest point of the wall of any building. 2. Other yards shall be measured from the property line to the nearest point of the wall of any building. 3. The height of a building in relation to yard standards is the vertical distance from the ground to the top of the roof, measured at a point which is a specific distance from the property line. Height measurements shall be based on the existing topography of the site, before grading for proposed on-site improvements. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) C. Yard Standards. 1. Street yards shall comply with the following: Table 2: Minimum Street Yards Zone Minimum Street Yard R-1 20 feet R-2 20 feet R-3 15 feet R-4 15 feet C/OS 20 feet O 15 feet PF As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-N 10 feet C-C As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-D As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-R As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-T 10 feet C-S See Chapter 17.46 M See Chapter 17.48 * If the zone of adjacent lot does not have its own standard, no street yard is required. Lots separated by streets or other rights-of-way are not considered adjacent. If more than one zone is adjacent, the largest yard shall be required. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 29 2. Other yards shall comply with the following: Table 3: Minimum Other Yards In R-1 And R-2 Zones Maximum Building Minimum Required Height * Yard ** A point this high on Must be at least this the roof of a building: far from the property line: (feet) (feet) 1-12 5.0 (min.in R-1 & R-2) 13 5.5 14-15 6.0 16-17 7.0 18-19 8.0 20 8.5 21-22 9.0 23-24 10.0 25 10.5 26 11.0 27 11.5 28 12.0 29 12.5 30-31 13.0 32 13.5 33 14.0 34 14.5 35 15.0 *Building heights shall be rounded to the nearest whole foot. ** Yards shall be rounded to the nearest 0.5 foot. Table 4: Minimum Other Yards In R-3, R-4, O And C-N Zones Maximum Building Minimum Required Height* Yard** A point this high on Must be at least this far the roof of a building: from the property line: (feet) (feet) 1-13 5 (min. yard) 14-15 5.5 16-17 6 18-20 6.5 21-22 7 23-24 7.5 25-26 8 27-29 8.5 30-31 9 32-33 9.5 34-35 (max. height) 10 * Building heights shall be rounded to the nearest whole foot. ** Yards shall be rounded to the nearest 0.5 foot. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 30 Table 5: Minimum Other Yards In C/OS, PF, C-C, C-R, C-T, C-S and M Zones Zone Minimum Other Yard C/OS 20 feet PF As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-C As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-D As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-R As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-T As provided in zone of adjacent lot* C-S See Chapter 17.46 M See Chapter 17.48 * If the zone of adjacent lot does not have its own standard, no yard is required. Lots separated by streets or other rights-of-way are not considered adjacent. If more than one zone is adjacent, the largest yard shall be required. 3. Yards with City-required landscape plans shall be landscaped and maintained in accordance with approved plans. D. What may Occupy Yards. 1. Utility Structures. Components of public utility systems may be located within street yards when approved by the Architectural Review Commission. 2. Fences, Walls and Hedges. Fences, walls and hedges may occupy yards to the extent provided in Section 17.16.050. (Vegetation may be controlled by the California Solar Shade Control Act.) 3. Signs. Signs in conformance with the Sign Regulations codified in Chapter 15.40 may occupy yards to the extent provided in those regulations. 4. Architectural Features. The following and similar architectural features may extend into a required yard no more than 30 inches: a. Cornices, canopies, eaves, buttresses, chimneys, solar collectors, shading louvers, reflectors, water heater enclosures, and bay or other projecting windows that do not include usable floor space (Figure 1). Figure 1 City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 31 b. Fire escapes, uncovered balconies, uncovered porches, or unenclosed outside stairways and landings may extend into the required yard not more than four feet or one-half the required yard distance, whichever is less. (Figure 2) c. Decks, planters and similar features less than 30 inches above grade may be located within the required yards. Figure 2 5. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures which have been approved by the Architectural Review Commission may be located within a required yard, provided no part of the enclosure is less than three feet from any right-of-way or adopted setback line. 6. Unenclosed Parking Spaces in Other Yards. Unenclosed parking spaces and parking aisles may be located within other yards. 7. Unenclosed. Tandem Parking Spaces. For single dwellings where tandem parking is provided pursuant to the parking standards, one unenclosed space may be located within the street yard. 8. Enclosed Parking Spaces in Street Yard Prohibited. In no case may an enclosed parking space from which vehicles exit directly onto the street be located less than 20 feet from the street right-of-way or setback line. In a flag lot subdivision, this setback requirement shall apply to the access roadway. E. Exception To Yard Requirements. These regulations provide two general types of exceptions to the yard requirements: first, those which the property is entitled to because of physical circumstances, and second, those which the City may approve upon request and subject to certain discretionary criteria. 1. Exceptions Property May Be Entitled To. a. Street Yards on Corner Lots Recorded Before April 1, 1965. On corner lots in the R-1 and R-2 zones, recorded before April 1, 1965, the street yard along the lot frontage having the longer dimension shall be not less than 10 feet, as in Figure 3. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 32 Figure 3 b. Street Yards on Corner Lots Where Each Corner Lot has Its Longer Frontage Along the Cross Street. In the R-1 and R-2 zones, when each corner lot on a cross street has its longer frontage along the cross street, as in Figure 4, the street yard along the longest frontage shall be not less than 10 feet. Figure 4 c. Street Yard Averaging (developed areas). Where these regulations require street yards and where buildings have been erected on at least one-half of the lots in a block as of the effective date of the regulations codified in this section, the minimum required street yard shall be the average of the street yards of the developed lots, but in no case less than 10 feet nor more than would otherwise be required. d. Reduced Street Yard for New Structure Providing Additional Creek Setback. Where a new structure provides a creek setback larger than required by this title, the required street yard shall be reduced one foot for each one foot of additional creek setback, so long as the street yard is at least one-half that required by Table 2. 2. Discretionary Exceptions. a. Reduced Street Yards. Upon approval of a use permit, the director may allow street yards of not less than 10 feet for structures and unenclosed parking spaces, including carports. Reductions may be approved for garages when the driveway is long enough to accommodate a parked car that doesn't overhang the sidewalk. b. Variable Street Yards in Subdivisions. In new residential subdivisions, the entity approving the subdivision may approve variable street yards, to be noted on the approved map, provided the average of the yards on a block is at least 15 feet and no yard is less than 10 feet. c. Variable Other Yards In Subdivisions. In new residential subdivisions, the entity approving the subdivision map may approve exceptions to the other yard standards, with the exceptions to be noted on the map, provided a separation of at least 10 feet between buildings on adjacent lots will be maintained and an acceptable level of solar exposure will be guaranteed by alternative yard requirements or private easements. d. Other Yard Variations in Previously Subdivided Areas. Upon approval of a use permit, the Director may allow other yards to be reduced to zero under either of the following circumstances: City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 33 i. When there exists adequate recorded agreement running with the land to maintain at least 10 feet of separation between buildings on adjacent parcels; or ii. When the reduction is for either a minor addition to an existing legal structure which is non-conforming with regard to yard requirements or for a detached single-story accessory structure provided that the Director makes the following findings: (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) o in the case of a minor addition, that the minor addition is a logical extension of the existing non-conforming structure; (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) o in the case of a detached single-story accessory structure, that the accessory structure is consistent with the traditional development pattern of the neighborhood and will have a greater street yard setback than the main structure; (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) o that adjacent affected properties will not be deprived of reasonable solar exposure; (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) o that no useful purpose would be realized by requiring the full yard; o that no significant fire protection, emergency access, privacy or security impacts are likely from the addition; and o that it is impractical to obtain a 10-foot separation easement pursuant to subsection "i" above. All such minor additions and new accessory structures shall comply with applicable provisions of Title 15, Building and Construction Regulations, of this code (see also Chapter 17.14, Non-conforming structures). (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) e. Other Yard Building Height Exceptions. Upon approval of a use permit, the Director may allow exceptions to the standards provided in Tables 3, 4, and 5 of subsection C2 of this section. Such exceptions may be granted in any of the following and similar circumstances, but in no case shall exceptions be granted for less than the minimum yard required: (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) i. When the property that will be shaded by the excepted development will not be developed or will not be deprived of reasonable solar exposure, considering its topography and zoning; ii. When the exception is of a minor nature, involving an insignificant portion of total available solar exposure; iii. When the properties at issue are within an area where use of solar energy is generally infeasible because of landform shading; iv. When adequate recorded agreement running with the land exists to protect established solar collectors and probable collector locations; v. When the property to be shaded is a street. vi. Where no significant fire protection, emergency access, privacy or security impacts are likely to result from the exception. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) f. Intersection Visibility. At the intersections not controlled by a stop sign or traffic signal, no plant, structure or other solid object over three feet high which would obstruct visibility may be located within the area indicated in Figure 8. At controlled intersections, the City Engineer may determine visibility requirements for proper sight distance. (Note: Yard requirements may also be modified by variance, Chapter 17.60; planned development, Chapter 17.62; specific plan, Chapter 17.52; or special consideration zone, Chapter 17.56.) (Ord. 1102 - Ex. A(7), (8), 1987; Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987; Ord. 1009 - 1, 1984; Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(C)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 34 Figure 8 17.16.025 Creek setbacks. A. Purpose. Creek setbacks are intended to: 1. Protect scenic resources, water quality, and natural creekside habitat, including opportunities for wildlife habitation, rest, and movement. 2. Further the restoration of damaged or degraded habitat, especially where a continuous riparian habitat corridor can be established. 3. Allow for natural changes that may occur within the creek corridor. 4. Help avoid damage to development from erosion and flooding. 5. Enable implementation of adopted City plans. B. Waterways Subject to Setbacks. Creek setback requirements shall apply to all creeks as defined in the Open Space Element and shown on that element’s Creek Map, and only to those creeks. C. Measurement of Creek Setbacks. Creek setbacks shall be measured from the existing top of bank (or the future top of bank resulting from a creek alteration reflected in a plan approved by the City), or from the edge of the predominant pattern of riparian vegetation, whichever is farther from the creek flow line (Figure 4.1). The Community Development Director may determine the predominant pattern of riparian vegetation, where the edge of the vegetation varies greatly in a short length along the creek, in a way unrelated to topography (for example, the Director will not base the setback line on individual trees or branches extending out from the channel or on small gaps in vegetation extending toward the channel). Where riparian vegetation extends over a public street, no creek setback is required on property which is on the side of the street away from the creek. D. Plan Information. The location of top of bank and of riparian vegetation shall be shown on all project plans subject to City approval. The location of these features is subject to confirmation by the Community Development Director, based on observation of actual conditions and, as needed, the conclusions of persons with expertise in hydrology, biology, or geology. E. Creek Setback Dimensions. Different setback dimensions are established in recognition of different parcel sizes and locations of existing structures for areas within the city in comparison with areas which may be annexed, and in response to different sizes of the creek channels and tributary drainage areas. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 35 1. Creeks within the 1996 City Limits. Along all creeks within the city limits as of July 1, 1996, the setback shall be 20 feet, except as provided in parts E.3, E.4 or G below. Where the city limit follows a creek, the setback on the side within the 1996 city limits shall be 20 feet and the setback on the annexed side shall be as provided in part 2 below. 2. Creeks in Areas Annexed After 1996. Along any creek in an area annexed to the City after July 1, 1996, the following setbacks shall be provided, unless a specific plan or development plan approved by the City Council provides a larger or smaller setback, consistent with the purpose of these regulations and with General Plan policies. a. Fifty-foot Setbacks. The setback along the following shall be 50 feet: San Luis Obispo Creek (all of main branch); San Luis Obispo Creek East Fork, from San Luis Obispo Creek (main branch) to the confluence with Acacia Creek; Stenner Creek. b. Thirty-five-foot Setbacks. The setback along the following shall be 35 feet: Prefumo Creek; Froom Creek; Brizziolari Creek; San Luis Obispo Creek East Fork tributary, from the confluence with Acacia Creek to Broad Street (Highway 227); Acacia Creek and its tributaries west of Broad Street (Highway 227); the segment of the tributary of Acacia Creek which flows generally parallel to and on the easterly side of Broad Street (Highway 227), from Broad Street to Fuller Road. c. Twenty-foot Setbacks. The setback along all creeks except those listed in parts “a” and “b” immediately above shall be 20 feet. (Informational map is available in the Community Development Department.) 3. Larger Setbacks. To mitigate potentially significant environmental impacts in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, or to implement adopted City plans, when approving a discretionary application the City may require setbacks larger than required by parts 1 and 2 above, or further limitations on the items which may be placed within setbacks. (Also, other City regulations may restrict or prevent development in a floodway or floodplain.) 4. Prior Approvals. Where the City has explicitly approved a creek setback smaller than required by this section, prior to adoption of this section, by action on a tract or parcel map (whether or not a vesting map), architectural review application, use permit, Planned Development zoning, or Special Considerations zoning, that smaller setback shall remain in effect so long as the approval is in effect. F. Items Prohibited within Setbacks. The following shall not be placed or constructed within a creek setback, except as provided in part G below: structures; paving; parking lots; in nonresidential zones, areas used for storing or working on vehicles, equipment, or materials. G. Exceptions to Creek Setbacks. 1. Entitled Replacement Structures. Where a structure lawfully existed on or before October 3, 1996, within a creek setback required by this chapter, the following shall apply. This part is not intended to allow replacement of paving that existed on or before October 3, 1996, with new paving or a building, unless a discretionary approval is obtained pursuant to part 17.16.025.G(4). a. Any structure built in replacement of such a structure may occupy the same footprint, within the creek setback, as the previous structure, without obtaining a discretionary exception. (See also Section 17.16.020(E)(1)(d).) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 36 b. Additional floor area shall not be added to the encroaching part of the structure (for example, by adding stories). c. The part of a structure that is nonconforming due solely to the creek setback encroachment may be remodeled without regard to the limits of Section 17.14.020(B) and (C) of this title. 2. Entitled Accessory Structures and Uses. The following items may be located within the required creek setback, without obtaining a discretionary exception, provided that they: do not extend beyond the top of bank into the creek channel; will not cause the removal of native riparian vegetation; will not reduce any flooding capacity pursuant to the city’s flood damage prevention regulations; in total occupy not more than one-half of the setback area; are consistent with other property development standards of the zoning regulations. a. Walls or fences, provided that in combination with buildings they enclose not more than one-half of the setback area on any development site. b. For a single-family dwelling: uncovered parking spaces, patios, and walkways. (Pedestrian paths and bicycle paths require a discretionary exception as provided in part 4.) c. Decks, stairs, and landings which are no more than thirty inches in height. d. One-story, detached buildings used as tool and storage sheds, play houses, and similar uses, provided the projected roof area does not exceed one hundred twenty square feet. e. Garden structures such as trellises, arbors, and gazebos, provided they are constructed using an open lattice design and lightweight materials. 3. Entitled Architectural Features. The following architectural features may extend into the setback up to thirty inches: cornices, canopies, eaves, buttresses, chimneys, solar collectors, shading louvers, water heater enclosures, and bay or other projecting windows that do not include usable floor space. 4. Discretionary Exceptions. a. Intent. Discretionary exceptions to creek setback standards are intended to allow reasonable use of sites that are subject to creek setbacks, where there is no practicable alternative to the exception. Generally, such exceptions are limited to small parcels that are essentially surrounded by sites that have been developed with setbacks smaller than those in subsection E of this section. In the case of pedestrian paths, bicycle paths, and bridges, the site may be large, but there are no options for avoiding a crossing of the creek or encroaching into the creek setback. b. Application Type. A creek setback smaller than required by subsection E of this section may be approved by city action on a plan for public facilities approved by the city council or on a specific plan, development plan under planned development zoning, land division, use permit, or architectural review. Where one of these types of applications is not otherwise required for the proposed feature, an exception request shall be in the form of an administrative use permit. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 37 c. Public Notice. Public notice for a project involving a creek setback exception, regardless of application type, shall include a clear description of the feature or features proposed to receive the exception, and the extent of the exception. d. Findings. Each discretionary exception shall be subject to each of the following findings, regardless of the type of project application under which the request is considered. i. The location and design of the feature receiving the exception will minimize impacts to scenic resources, water quality, and riparian habitat, including opportunities for wildlife habitation, rest, and movement; and ii. The exception will not limit the city’s design options for providing flood control measures that are needed to achieve adopted city flood policies; and iii. The exception will not prevent the implementation of city-adopted plans, nor increase the adverse environmental effects of implementing such plans; and iv. There are circumstances applying to the site, such as size, shape or topography, which do not apply generally to land in the vicinity with the same zoning, that would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity with the same zoning; and v. The exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege –an entitlement inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning; and vi. The exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area of the project or downstream; and vii. Site development cannot be accomplished with a redesign of the project; and viii. Redesign of the project would deny the property owner reasonable use of the property. (“Reasonable use of the property” in the case of new development may include less development than indicated by zoning. In the case of additional development on an already developed site, “reasonable development” may mean no additional development considering site constraints and the existing development’s scale, design, or density.) e. Biological Survey. A biological survey by a qualified, independent person shall be required for each discretionary exception request, to provide the basis for making finding subsection (G)(4)(d)(i) of this section, unless waived by the community development director upon determining that no purpose would be served by such a survey because no biological resources could be affected by the exception. f. Application Contents. In addition to any other information required for a project application, a request for creek setback exception shall include the following: i. A description of the feature or features proposed for exception and the extent of the exception. ii. A description of potential design changes for the project which would eliminate or reduce the need for the exception. iii. A statement why an exception is deemed necessary by the applicant. iv. Mitigation proposed to offset any harmful effects of the exception. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 38 17.16.030 Coverage. A. Definition. “Coverage” means the area of a lot covered by the footprint of all structures, as well as decks, balconies, porches, and similar architectural features, expressed as a percentage of the total lot area. Uncovered decks or porches which are 30 inches or less from the ground shall not be included in the determination of coverage. (See Figures 5 and 6.) (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(D)) (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 39 Figure 5 Figure 6 B. Application and Exception. Maximum coverage shall be as provided in the specific property development standards for the various zones in Chapters 17.24 through 17.56 inclusive, except that the Planning Commission may grant exceptions to maximum coverage for churches, synagogues, temples, etc., in any zone, subject to approval of a use permit. 17.16.035 Size Limits on Large-Scale Retail Establishments A. Large-scale commercial buildings shall not exceed the retail size limits established for each commercial zone (see Sections 17.16.035, 17.38.020, 17.40.020, 17.42.020, 17.44.020, and 71.46.020) B. Exceptions to Retail Building Size Limits City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 40 1. When an otherwise lawful retail establishment existed on the effective date of the size limits, such structure shall be considered a development non-conformity but may be continued, structurally altered, repaired or reconstructed so long as it is not increased, extended or enlarged beyond the gross floor area of the building that existed on that date. To the extent practicable, the design guidelines for large-scale retail projects shall be applied to any alteration, reconstruction or repair that takes place after the effective date of the size limits. 17.16.040 Height. The height of a building is the vertical distance from the average level of the ground under the building to the topmost point of the roof. The average level of the ground is determined by adding the elevation of the lowest point of the part of the lot covered by the building to the elevation of the highest point of the part of the lot covered by the building, and dividing by two. (See Figure 7.) Height measurements shall be based on existing topography of the site, before grading for proposed on-site improvements. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) Figure 7 See also Section 17.16.020 for relationship of yards and building height. Components of solar energy systems, chimneys, screened mechanical equipment, vents, antennae and steeples shall extend not more than 10 feet above the maximum building height. Commercial and governmental agency antennae may exceed the height limits for the zone in which they are located if such an exception is approved by the Director. Any other exception to the height limits requires approval of a variance as provided in Chapter 17.60. For height limits of signs, see Chapter 15.40. Sign Regulations. (Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987; Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(E)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 41 17.16.050 Fences, walls and hedges. A. Fences, walls or hedges may be placed within required yards, provided: Figure 9 1. The maximum height in any street yard shall be as shown in Figure 9; 2. The maximum height in any other yard shall be six feet; B. Fences or walls may be placed outside required yards, provided: 1. The maximum height is eight feet. 2. Where the wall is connected to and a part of the house, it may be any height allowed in the underlying zone. C. Where fences or walls are located on retaining walls, the height of the retaining wall shall be considered as part of the overall height of the fence or wall; D. The Director may grant exceptions to these standards subject to a finding that no public purpose would be served by strict compliance with these standards. E. A public notice shall be posted at the site of each proposed fence height exception. If anyone informs the Community Development Department of a reasonable objection concerning the proposed fence height exception within five days of the posting, the Director shall schedule a hearing for the application as provided for administrative use permits. If no questions or objections are received by the Community Development Department within five days after posting, the Director may issue a letter of approval upon submission of all required information and without further notice or public hearing. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(F)) 17.16.060 Parking space requirements. A. Intent. This section is intended to ensure provision of adequate off-street parking, considering the demands likely to result from various uses, combinations of uses, and settings. It is the City's intent, where possible, to consolidate parking and to minimize the area devoted exclusively to parking and drives when typical demands may be satisfied more efficiently by shared facilities. B. Shared parking reduction. Where two or more uses share common parking areas, the total number of parking spaces required may be reduced by up to 10%, with approval of an City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 42 administrative use permit. Where shared parking is located on more than one parcel, affected parties must record an agreement governing the shared parking, to the satisfaction of the Director. C. Mixed-use parking reduction. By approving an administrative use permit, the Director may reduce the parking requirement for projects sharing parking by up to 20%, in addition to the shared parking reduction, for a total maximum parking reduction of 30%, upon finding that the times of maximum parking demand from various uses will not coincide. D. Off-site Parking. The Director may, by approving an administrative use permit, allow some or all of the required parking to be located on a site different from the use. Such off-site parking shall be within a zone where the use is allowed or conditionally allowed, or within an office, commercial or manufacturing zone. It shall be within 300 feet of the use and shall not be separated from the use by any feature that would make pedestrian access inconvenient or hazardous. The site on which the parking is located shall be owned, leased or otherwise controlled by the party controlling the use. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(G)) E. Bicycle and Motorcycle Spaces. Each use or development, which requires 10 or more spaces, shall provide facilities for parking bicycles and motorcycles as follows: 1. Motorcycle Spaces. Parking for motorcycles shall be provided at the rate of one space for each 20 car spaces. Projects that provide more motorcycle spaces than required may reduce the required car spaces at the rate of one car space for each five motorcycle spaces, up to a 10% reduction. 2. Bicycle Spaces. Parking for bicycles shall be provided in accordance with Table 6.5. Projects which provide more bicycle and/or motorcycle spaces than required may reduce the required car spaces at the rate of one car space for each five bicycle spaces, up to a 10% reduction. All bicycle parking that exceeds the required number of spaces shall be apportioned between short-term and long-term bicycle spaces as stipulated by Table 6.5 F. Requirements by Type of Use. Except as otherwise provided in these regulations, for every structure erected or enlarged and for any land or structure devoted to a new use requiring more spaces according to the schedule set out in this subsection, the indicated minimum number of off-street parking spaces located on the site of the use shall be provided. The right to occupy and use any premises shall be contingent on preserving the required parking. In no case may required parking spaces for a use be rented or leased to off-site uses or used for other purposes. Parking, in addition to these requirements, may be required as a condition of use permit approval. G. Uses Not Listed. The Director shall determine the parking requirement for uses which are not listed. His/her determination shall be based on similarity to listed uses, and may be appealed to the Planning Commission. H. Parking calculations. 1. The parking requirement is based on the gross floor area of the entire use, unless stated otherwise. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 43 2. When the calculation of required parking results in a fractional number, it shall be rounded to the next highest whole number if the fraction is one-half or more; otherwise it shall be rounded down to the next lowest whole number. 3. Where there has been a reduction in required parking, all resulting spaces must be available for common use and not exclusively assigned to any individual use. I. Tandem parking. For residential uses, when parking spaces are identified for the exclusive use of occupants of a designated dwelling, required spaces may be arranged in tandem (that is, one space behind the other) subject to approval of the Community Development Director. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 TABLE 6 - PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY USE Type of Use Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required Crop production and grazing Greenhouse, commercial Livestock feed lot Furniture and fixtures manufacturing, cabinet shop Industrial research and development Laboratory - Medical, analytical, research, testing Laundry, dry cleaning plant Manufacturing - Heavy Manufacturing - Light Petroleum product storage and distribution Photo and film processing lab Printing and publishing Recycling facilities - Scrap and dismantling yard Recycling facilities - Small collection facility Storage yard Warehousing, indoor storage Wholesaling and distribution Bed and breakfast inn Hotel, motel Page 44 One space per 300 square feet office or laboratory area, plus one space per 500 square feet indoor assembly or fabrication area, plus one space per 1,500 square feet outdoor work area or indoor warehouse area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet office areas plus one space per 500 square feet indoor storage area plus one space per 2,000 square feet outdoor storage area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 500 square feet of gross floor area plus one space per 10,000 square feet outdoor storage area, but in no case less than 4 spaces One space per 500 square feet of gross floor area plus one space per 10,000 square feet outdoor storage area, but in no case less than 4 spaces As provided in approved use permit No requirement No requirement As provided in approved use permit Same as Manufacturing - Light INDUSTRY, MANUFACTURING & PROCESSING, WHOLESALING One space per 2,000 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 1,500 square feet indoor storage area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 1,000 square feet indoor sales/storage area, plus one space per 2,000 square feet outdoor sales area One per room or group of rooms to be occupied as a suite, plus one for resident manager's quarters, plus eating/assembly area requirements As provided in approved use permit One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet accessory office area plus one space per 300 square feet to 500 square feet manufacturing floor area, to be determined by director according to employment characteristics of each use, plus one per 1,500 square feet outdoor manufacturing area One per room or group of rooms to be occupied as a suite, plus two for resident manager's quarters One space per five beds, plus one for manager. When the hostel is part of a residence: one space per five beds, in addition to two spaces for the residence.Hostel AGRICULTURE Recycling facilities - Collection and processing facility LODGING Recreational vehicle (RV) park accessory to hotel, motel City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations TABLE 6 - PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY USE Type of Use Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required Bar/tavern Club, lodge, private meeting hall Commercial recreation facility - Indoor Commercial recreation facility - Outdoor Educational conferences Fitness/health facility Library, museum Library, branch facility Park, playground Public assembly facility Religious facility School - College, university - Campus School - Elementary, middle, secondary School - Specialized education/training Special event Sports and active recreation facility Sports and entertainment assembly facility Studio - Art, dance, martial arts, music, etc. Theater - Drive-in Page 45 Two spaces per lane plus one space per four seats spectator/eating area Bowling alleys As provided in approved use permit One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 500 square feet storage/display area plus government office and meeting room requirements As provided in approved use permit One space per 60 square feet floor or outdoor ground area for customer use, including seating and dancing areas, plus one space per 100 square feet food preparation area One space per 500 square feet One space per 60 square feet of customer use plus one space per 100 square feet of food preparation area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per four fixed seats or one space per 40 square feet seating area without fixed seats, in the largest assembly room One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 500 square feet outdoor use area One space per four fixed seats or one space per 40 square feet of assembly area without fixed seats One space per 50 square feet per classroom floor area One space per 500 square feet or as provided in approved use permit One space per 100 square feet of play surface One space per four fixed seats (one space per 40 square feet seating area without fixed seats) in largest assembly room Two spaces per classroom plus one space per 300 square feet office, assembly or common area As provided in approved use permit One space per 50 square feet per classroom floor area As provided in approved use permit Theater One space per 200 square feet gross floor area One space per four seats No requirement RECREATION, EDUCATION, & PUBLIC ASSEMBLY USES Night club As provided in approved use permitSchool - Boarding school, elementary, middle, secondary School - College, university - Satellite classroom facility City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 TABLE 6 - PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY USE Type of Use Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required Boarding/rooming house, dormitory Caretaker quarters Convents and monasteries Fraternity, sorority High occupancy residential use Home occupation Live/work units Mixed-use project Mobile home park Multi-family dwellings Residential care facilities - 6 or fewer residents Residential care facilities - 7 or more residents Single-family dwellings Work/live units Page 46 One space per 1.5 occupants or 1.5 spaces per bedroom, whichever is greater Two spaces per dwelling One space per five occupants One space per 1.5 occupants or 1.5 spaces per bedroom, whichever is greater The parking requirement shall be greater of: 1. The number of space required for dwellings. or 2. One off-street parking space per adult occupant, less one. See Section 17.08.090 2 spaces per unit Same as Single-family dwellings 1.5 spaces per unit: 1 space to be with unit Same as Single-family dwellings Same as Single-family dwellings Same as Single-family dwellings R-1 and C/OS: 2 spaces per dwelling, one of which must be covered. All other zones: 1 per studio apartment: 1-1/2 for first bedroom plus 1/2 for each additional bedroom in a unit, plus 1 for each five units in developments of more than five units. Also see parking reduction paragraphs under 17.16.060. 2 spaces per unit RESIDENTIAL USES City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations TABLE 6 - PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY USE Type of Use Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required Auto and vehicle sales and rental Auto parts sales, with installation Auto parts sales, without installation Building and landscape materials sales, indoor Building and landscape materials sales, outdoor Construction and heavy equipment sales and rental Convenience store Extended hour retail Farm supply and feed store Fuel dealer (propane, etc) Furniture, furnishings, and appliance stores General retail - 2,000 sf or less General retail - More than 2,000 sf, up to 15,000 sf General retail - More than 15,000 sf, up to 45,000 sf General retail - More than 45,000 sf, up to 60,000 sf Groceries, liquor, specialty foods Mobile home, RV, and boat sales Office-supporting retail, 2,000 sf or less Outdoor temporary and/or seasonal sales Produce stand Restaurant Service station (see also "vehicle services") Warehouse stores - 45,000 sf or less gfa Warehouse stores - more than 45,000 sf gfa Page 47 One space per 500 square feet floor area A maximum of one space per 200 square feet gross floor area, with the exception for more spaces if structured multi-level parking is used Florists and Photofinishing (retail) Retail sales and repair of bicycles One space per 500 square feet floor area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 500 square feet parts sales service area, plus one space per 2,000 square feet outdoor sales area one space for attendant booth plus two per service bay plus one space per four fuel pumps Minimum one space per 300 square feet gross floor area A maximum of one space per 200 square feet gross floor area, with the exception for more spaces if structured multi-level parking is used One space per 300 square feet gross floor area See Section 17.08.020 As provided in approved use permit One space per 60 sq. ft. customer use area, including waiting seating, counter service areas, and dancing areas, plus one space per 100 sq. ft. food preparation, including counter space, pantry storage, and dishwashing areas. Walls, halls, restrooms, and dead storage areas do not count as either customer use or food preparation floor area One space per 200 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 500 square feet parts sales service area, plus one space per 2,000 square feet outdoor sales area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area A maximum of one space per 200 square feet gross floor area, with the exception for more spaces if structured multi-level parking is used Same as specific type of retail General retail - More than 60,000 sf, up to 140,000 sf One per 500 square feet indoor sales/storage area plus one space per 2,000 square feet outdoor sales/storage area. One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One per 500 square feet indoor sales/storage area plus one space per 2,000 square feet outdoor sales/storage area. One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 500 square feet indoor sales area plus one space per 2,000 square feet warehouse or outdoor sales area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 500 square feet parts sales service area, plus one space per 2,000 square feet outdoor sales area Two spaces for employee parking, plus one space per 500 square feet of gross floor area and a minimum of five bicycle parking spaces shall be provided per business One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 500 square feet indoor sales area plus one space per 2,000 square feet warehouse area RETAIL SALES Office-supporting retail, more than 2,000, up to 5,000 sf City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 TABLE 6 - PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY USE Type of Use Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required Banks and financial services Business support services Medical service - Clinic, laboratory, urgent care Medical service - Doctor office Medical service - Extended care Medical service - Hospital Office - Accessory Office - Business and service Office - Government Office - Processing Office - Production and administrative Office - Professional Office - Temporary Photographer, photographic studio Page 48 One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area Medical dental and other health services: one per 200 square feet gross floor area. All others: one space per 300 square feet gross floor area. Medical dental and other health services: one per 200 square feet gross floor area. All others: one space per 300 square feet gross floor area. One space per four beds (adult): one space per five juvenile occupants One space per bed As required for principle use Medical dental and other health services: one per 200 square feet gross floor area. All others: one space per 300 square feet gross floor area. See Section 17.08.010 C One space per 200 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area Offices: one per 300 square feet gross floor area. Meeting rooms: one per four fixed seats or one per 40 square feet of seating area without fixed seats. One space per 200 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet office, sorting, customer service area plus one space per 500 square feet bulk handling No requirement Post offices SERVICES - BUSINESS, FINANCIAL & PROFESSIONAL ATMs City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations TABLE 6 - PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY USE Type of Use Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required Catering service Cemetery, mausoleum, columbarium Day care - Day care center Day care - Family day care home Equipment rental Homeless shelter Maintenance service, client site services Mortuary, funeral home Personal services Public safety facilities Public utility facilities Repair service - Equipment, large appliances, etc. Social service organization Vehicle services - Repair and maintenance - Major Vehicle services - Repair and maintenance - Minor Vehicle services - Carwash Veterinary clinic/hospital, boarding, large animal Ambulance, taxi, and/or limousine dispatch facility Broadcast studio Railroad facilities Transit station or terminal Truck or freight terminal Water and wastewater treatment plants and services Page 49 Service stations Three spaces per emergency vehicle Ambulance services As provided in approved use permitWater and wastewater treatment plants Airport Heliport To be determined when use permit is approved One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 1,000 square feet garage/warehouse area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area Self service laundry/dry cleaner One space per 100 square feet food preparation area One space per 500 square feet of building area Two spaces plus one per 14 clients Small family day care - same as for "Dwellings". Large family day care - One space plus required residential parking. One per 300 square feet office area plus 1 per 500 square feet indoor display/storage plus 1 per 1,000 square feet outdoor display/storage Two spaces for the facility plus one space for each six occupants at maximum allowed occupancy One space per 300 square feet gross floor area Repair services - Small appliances, shoes, etc. One space per 300 square feet One space per 500 square feet gross floor area 1 per four fixed seats or 1 per 40 square feet assembly area, whichever is greater One space per 200 square feet gross floor area One Space per each four washers or dryers One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One space per 500 square feet gross floor area Two spaces plus sufficient waiting line(s) or Two spaces plus washing area(s) One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space for attendant booth plus two per service bay plus one space per four fuel pumps As provided in approved use permit One space per 300 square feet office plus one space per 1,000 square feet garage/warehouse area One space per 300 square feet office plus one space per 1,000 square feet warehouse/service area One space per 300 square feet office or waiting room One space per 300 square feet office/waiting area plus one space per 1,000 square feet house/garage area TRANSPORTATION & COMMUNICATIONS Veterinary clinic/hospital, boarding, small animal, indoor Veterinary clinic/hospital, boarding, small animal, outdoor One space per 300 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet office area plus one space per 1,500 square feet warehouse/service area plus space for fleet vehicles One space per 500 square feet gross floor area One space per 300 square feet gross floor area SERVICES - GENERAL City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 50 TABLE 6.5 BICYCLE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS Zone Number of bicycle spaces as a percentage of required auto spaces a Minimum % short-term b bicycle spaces Minimum long- term c bicycle spaces R-2, R-3, R-4 5% 100% d C-C, C-R, C-N, C-D 15% 50% 40% O 15% 10% 80% C-T 5% 10% 80% C-S, M 15% 10% 80% PF (schools, junior high to college) 1 space per 3 students Park & ride lots 10% - - 100% a Requirements apply to uses that require 10 or more vehicle parking spaces. When less that ½ space is calculated, one space is required. b “Short-Term” bicycle parking is used by visitors to multi-family housing and by patrons of commercial and institutional uses. Bicycle racks are used to satisfy this need. c “Long-Term” bicycle parking is used by employees of commercial and institutional uses and by residents. Fully enclosed lockers are used to satisfy this need. Lockable rooms reserved for bicycle storage and secured parking areas managed by attendants are other acceptable forms. d In addition to short-term parking, bicycle lockers or interior space within each dwelling or accessory structure (e.g. garages) should be reserved for the storage of at least two bicycles. J. Elderly housing parking. Housing occupied exclusively by persons aged 62 or older may provide one-half space per dwelling unit or one space per four occupants of a group quarters. K. Low-income housing parking. Housing occupied exclusively by very low or low-income households, as defined by the State, may provide one car and one bicycle space per dwelling unit. L. Additions and changes in use for existing uses or structures which do not meet current parking standards. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 51 1. Minor additions. Minor additions to existing legal structures or uses, which are non-conforming because they do not meet current parking standards, may be permitted if they meet the following requirements: a. The parking spaces required for the addition are provided in conformance with this chapter, in addition to all parking spaces already provided for the existing use or structure; and b. All existing parking shall be in substantial compliance with parking and driveway standards; and c. The addition is not more than 25 percent of the existing gross floor area or 1000 square feet, whichever is greater; and d. For residential projects, at least one legally conforming space is provided for each existing unit in addition to all parking required for the addition itself. 2. Larger additions. Existing legal structures or uses which are non-conforming because they do not meet current parking standards may be expanded more than 25 percent of the existing gross floor area or 1000 square feet, subject to the following: a. All existing parking shall be in substantial compliance with parking and driveway standards; and b. All required parking for the existing use or structure plus that required for the addition is provided; or an administrative use permit is obtained and parking is provided pursuant to the following chart: Increase in parking provided for parking provided gross floor addition in addition for existing use or area existing parking structure is at least 25 - 49% 100% 50% 50 - 74% 100% 75% > 75% 100% 100% For residential projects, at least one legally conforming space is provided for each existing unit, in addition to all parking required for the addition itself. 3. Use changes. Changes in use, which increase the total parking demand from existing legal uses which are non-conforming because they do not meet current parking requirements, may be permitted so long as the number of spaces equal to the difference between the number required by the previous use and the number required by the new use is provided, in addition to all spaces already provided for the previous use. (Ord. 1122 - 1 Ex. A(part), 1988; Ord. 1114 - 1 Ex. A. 1988: Ord. 1102 - 1 Ex. A(10), (11), 1987: Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987: Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(G)) 17.16.070 Parking and driveway design and exceptions. A. Parking and driveway design and requirements for permits shall be as provided in the parking standards adopted by Council resolution. B. The Director may grant exceptions to the standards subject to appropriate conditions and upon finding that: City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 52 1. The exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the driveway or parking limitations upon other properties in the vicinity; 2. The exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity; and 3. The exception is reasonably necessary for the applicants full enjoyment of uses permitted upon his/her property. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(H)) 17.16.090 Screening of outdoor sales and storage. Screening shall be required for all outdoor sales and storage. Such screening shall consist of a solid fence, wall or mature hedge or other screen planting at least six feet high. The Community Development Director may waive the screening requirement when the use customarily is not screened from public view, such as auto sales or displays at service stations. The Community Development Director may defer the screening requirement where the sales or storage is adjacent to vacant land and where it is not visible from a public street. Such waiver or deferral may be by approval of whatever type of use permit may be required for the use. If no use permit is required, the waiver or deferral shall be in writing and shall set forth the circumstances justifying the action. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.5(J)) 17.16.100 Utility services. Deleted by Ordinance No. 1353 (1999 Series). Now part of the Uniform Administrative Code Amendments, relocated to Chapter 15.04. 17.16.110 Satellite Dish Antenna. A. Purpose To establish regulations which regulate the installation of dish-type satellite antenna to help protect public safety and preserve view corridors and neighborhood character. B. Definition 1. A satellite dish antenna is a device incorporating a reflective surface that is solid, open mesh, or bar-configured and is in the shape of a shallow dish, cone, horn or cornucopia, that is used to transmit and/or receive radio microwave, or other electromagnetic waves between terrestrially and/or orbitally based use. C. Residential Performance Standards The installation of dish-type satellite antenna may be permitted in all residential zones subject to the following criteria: 1. Antenna size: Maximum diameter to be 10 feet. 2. Setback: No part of a satellite dish antenna may be located in any required street or other yard. Antennas located outside a street yard setback but between the residence and the street are prohibited. 3. Height: Maximum antenna height to be 13 feet. All satellite dishes higher than side or rear yard fences shall be screened from neighboring properties. Roof-mounted installations or pole-mounted installations attached to eaves are prohibited except by use City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 53 permit. Any antenna that may block significant views from neighboring buildings or from public areas shall be subject to architectural review. 4. Number: One dish type satellite antenna is allowed per site, in addition to normal television and radio antennas. D. Commercial Performance Standards. The installation of dish-type satellite antenna may be permitted in the Office, Commercial, and Industrial zones subject to the following criteria: 1. Installation shall be subject to architectural review in accordance with the adopted Architectural Review Commission Ordinance and guidelines. 2. Installations shall not be permitted within street yard. 3. Installations shall be located so as to minimize visibility from adjoining properties and rights-of-way. E. Exceptions. Dish-type satellite antenna installations that cannot meet the performance standards included in paragraphs C and D above may be considered if an administrative use permit is obtained as outlined by Chapter 17.58. Conditions imposed as part of use permit approval would typically include requirements to minimize the visibility of the installation, including blockage of significant public and private views of hillsides, city vistas, or open space areas. Acceptable techniques to reduce the visibility of dish installations include use of alternative materials (wire mesh instead of solid surface), painting the dish in a subdued or natural color, and landscaped screening. F. Open Space/Conservation Standards. The installation of dish-type satellite antennas may be permitted in the Open Space/Conservation zone subject to an administrative use permit and subject to architectural review in accordance with the adopted ARC ordinance and guidelines. G. Building Permit Required. All satellite dish installations require issuance of a building permit. This is to insure that dishes are structurally sound and properly grounded. Plans submitted for a building permit for a roof-mounted or pole-mounted installation require certification by a registered engineer. (Ord. 1107 - 1 Ex. A, 1987) 17.16.120 Wireless telecommunication facilities. A. Purpose To establish standards for the development, siting and installation of wireless telecommunications facilities; to protect and promote public health, safety, and welfare; and to preserve view corridors and avoiding adverse visual and environmental impacts. These standards are not intended to be all-inclusive. Projects may be subject to additional standards deemed appropriate through architectural review and use permit processing to address site-specific conditions. B. Definitions. 1. Wireless telecommunications facilities consist of commercial wireless communications systems, including but not limited to: cellular, PCS, paging, broadband, data transfer, and any other type of technology that fosters wireless communication through the use of portable electronic devices. A facility includes all supporting structures and associated equipment. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 54 2. Co-location is the practice of two or more wireless telecommunication service providers sharing one support structure or building for the location of their antennas and equipment. 3. Stealthing means improvements or treatments added to a wireless telecommunications facility which mask or blend the proposed facility into the existing structure or visual backdrop in such a manner as to render it effectively unnoticeable to the casual observer. C. Exempt facilities. The following wireless telecommunication facilities are exempt from the requirements of this section: 1. Government-owned communications facilities used primarily to protect public health, welfare, and safety. 2. Facilities operated by providers of emergency medical services, including hospital, ambulance, and medical air transportation services, for use in the provision of those services. 3. Satellite dish antennas for residential and commercial use, solely for the use of the occupants of the site, subject to compliance with development standards set forth in Section 17.16.100 et al of the zoning ordinance. 4. Any facility specifically exempted under federal or state law. D. Applications and approvals required. Installation of a new wireless telecommunication or modification of an existing installation shall require use permit approval and architectural review. The applicant shall submit application materials and fees as required by the Community Development Department. E. Building permit required. Wireless communications facilities shall not be constructed, installed or modified prior to obtaining a City building permit. F. Site development and performance standards. 1. Setbacks. All facility towers and accessory structures shall comply with the setback requirements of the applicable zoning district. 2. Height. The height of any antenna or support equipment shall be determined as part of the use permit on a case by case basis. All facilities shall be designed to the minimum necessary functional height. 3. Site Access. Telecommunication facilities should use existing roads and parking whenever possible. New and existing access roads and parking shall be improved and surfaced where necessary to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 4. Aesthetics and Visibility. Facilities shall be creatively designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent possible by means of placement, screening and camouflage. The applicant shall use the smallest and least visible antennas possible to accomplish the coverage objectives. Each installation shall be designed to blend into its surroundings so that the antenna(s) and equipment are not apparent to the casual observer. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 55 a. Building mounted facilities shall appear as an integral part of the structure. Equipment and antennas shall be compatible and in scale with existing architectural elements, building materials and site characteristics. Wall mounted antennas shall be integrated architecturally with the style and character of the structure. If possible, antennas and equipment shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be effectively unnoticeable. b. Ground mounted support equipment shall be undergrounded or otherwise screened from view so as to be effectively unnoticeable. c. All connections and conduits between the base of the antenna(s) and support equipment shall be undergrounded. Connections and conduit above ground shall be fully enclosed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Electrical and telephone service to the support equipment shall be undergrounded. d. Ground mounted antennas, poles, structures, equipment, or other parts of a telecommunications facility, which would extend above a ridgeline so as to silhouette against the sky shall be discouraged. Where allowed, they shall be designed to be indistinguishable from the natural surroundings. 5. Lighting. All telecommunication facilities, not otherwise required to have lighting pursuant to Federal Aviation Administration rules, shall be unlit, except when authorized personnel are actually present at night, and except for exempt facilities. 6. Historic Buildings. Any wireless facility located on or adjacent to a historic building or site shall be designed to ensure consistency with the Secretary of Interior standards for remodeling and rehabilitation. 7. Equipment Upgrades. It shall be the responsibility of the owner/operator of a telecommunications facility to provide the City with a notice of intent to modify site equipment in any way. At the time of modification, co-location, or upgrade of facilities, existing equipment shall be replaced with equipment of equal or greater technical capacity and modified to reduce aesthetic impacts by reducing the size of the facility or introducing camouflaging techniques to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Unused or obsolete equipment or towers shall be removed from the site within 90 days after their use has ceased. 8. Number of facilities per site. The City shall retain the authority to limit the number of antennas with related equipment and providers to be located at any site and adjacent sites in order to prevent negative visual impacts associated with multiple facilities. 9. Noise. Each facility shall be operated in a manner that minimizes any possible disruption caused by noise to people working and living in the vicinity. At no time shall equipment noise from any source exceed an exterior noise level of 55 dB at the property line or within 20 feet of such equipment, whichever is less. This requirement may be modified at the discretion of the Community Development Director where typical ambient noise levels exceed 55 dB. Outdoor noise producing construction activities shall take place only on weekdays between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00 pm unless a different schedule is approved as part of the use permit. 10. Backup Generators. Any facility utilizing temporary backup generators shall be required to meet or exceed Air Pollution Control District Standards. All generators shall be fitted with approved air pollution control devices. Projects that propose to include backup generators shall require review and approval from the Air Pollution Control district. Project plans shall indicate location, size, horsepower, and type of fuel used for any proposed generator. Generators shall only be operated during power outages and for City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 56 testing and maintenance purposes. Testing and maintenance shall only take place on weekdays between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00 pm. 11. Biological Impacts. Wireless telecommunication facility shall minimize potential impacts to biological resources to the greatest extent possible. 12. Radio Interference. Interference with municipal radio communication is prohibited. Any telecommunication facility that the City has reason to believe is interfering with municipal radio communication shall cease operation immediately upon notice from the City, and shall be subject to use permit review and possible revocation. Testing shall be done prior to any permanent installation and frequencies shall be monitored at regular intervals after installation established by the use permit, at the expense of the facility owner/operator. 13. Airport Operations. Wireless communications facilities shall not be sited in locations where they will interfere with the operation of the San Luis Obispo Airport. Wireless towers and related facilities within the Airport Planning Area shall be referred to the Airport Manager or the Airport Land Use Commission for a determination of consistency with airport area standards. 14. Radio Frequencies and Electromagnetic Exposure. a. Wireless telecommunications facilities operating alone or in conjunction with other telecommunications facilities shall not produce radio frequency radiation in excess of the standards for permissible human exposure as adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Applications for facilities shall include a radio frequency radiation (RFR) report that measures the predicted levels of RF radiation emitted by the proposed facility. The radio frequency radiation report shall compare proposed project levels to levels allowed by the FCC and shall show output of the proposed facility in combination with other facilities located or proposed in the vicinity. b. The City may require one or more post-construction RFR reports as a condition of project approval, to verify that the actual levels of RFR emitted by the approved facilities, operating alone or in combination with other approved facilities, substantially conform to the pre-approval RFR report and do not exceed current standards for permissible human exposure to RFR as adopted by the FCC. 15. Signs. Explanatory warning signs shall be posted at all access points to cellular telecommunication facilities in compliance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95.2 color, symbol, and content conventions. 16. Nuisance. Facility generators, mechanical equipment, construction, testing and maintenance shall be operated or performed in such a manner that no nuisance results. At the discretion of the Director, upon receipt of written complaints, the use permit allowing a telecommunications facility may be scheduled for public review. At the hearing, conditions of approval may be added, deleted, or modified, or the use permit may be revoked. 17. Interference with Public Services and Facilities. Telecommunication facilities within public parks shall not interfere with park operations or limit public use of park facilities. Installations in conjunction with other public facilities shall be held to a similar standard. 18. City inspection. The City shall have the right to access facilities after 24 hours written or verbal notice. G. Abandonment. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 57 It shall be the responsibility of the owner/operator of a telecommunications facility to provide the City with a notice of intent to vacate the site a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to ceasing operation. Any wireless telecommunication facility that is not operated for a continuous period of ninety (90) days shall be removed within ninety (90) days of the date upon which the operation ceased. H. Revocation of a Permit. Wireless telecommunication service providers shall fully comply with all conditions related to any permit or approval granted under this section. Failure to comply with any condition shall constitute grounds for revocation. If a condition is not remedied within a reasonable period, the Community Development Director may schedule a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider revocation of the permit. (Ord. 1409 – 2001 Series) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 58 Chapter 17.17: PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS Sections: 17.17.010 Purpose. 17.17.020 Applicability of other provisions. 17.17.030 General requirements. 17.17.040 Visible storage or maintenance. 17.17.050 Front yard paving. 17.17.060 Roofs. 17.17.070 Fences. 17.17.080 Prohibited acts. 17.17.090 Private cause of action. 17.17.010 Purpose. The quality of life in this city is tied to the character and conditions of its neighborhoods. The purpose of these property maintenance standards is to protect the appearance, integrity and character of the community. 17.17.020 Applicability of other provisions. A. Use of property within the city may also be subject to provisions of this code not contained in this chapter, including, but not limited to, the following: Solid waste disposal, Chapter 8.04 Hazardous weeds and debris, Chapter 8.08 Nighttime parking of large vehicles, Section 10.36.150 Parking in yard, Section 10.36.233 Uniform codes (building regulations), Chapter 15.04 Fire prevention code, Chapter 15.08 Satellite dish antenna, Section 17.16.110 B. Where provisions of this chapter conflict with provisions of other applicable laws, including this code, the more restrictive provision shall prevail. 17.17.030 General requirements. The provisions of this chapter apply to all zones in the city, except as otherwise specified. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 59 17.17.040 Visible storage or maintenance. Storage and maintenance to be screened. Parking, storage, stockpiling, or maintenance of any of the following items on private property must be screened from any public right-of-way, except as provided in section D, below. Objects and activities will be considered "screened" when they are either 1) not visible from a public right-of-way or 2) behind a solid six-foot-high fence, wall, or hedge where such fence, wall, or hedge is otherwise permitted by zoning and building codes. A. Furniture and other equipment. Furniture or other equipment, including but not limited to stuffed couches and chairs, household appliances, sinks, heaters, boilers, tanks, machinery, other household or commercial equipment, or any parts thereof. B. Materials. Building materials, including but not limited to packing boxes, lumber, dirt piles, wood, landscape materials, or debris. C. Recreational vehicles and related devices. 1. Any airplane or other aircraft, or any parts thereof, 2. Special mobile equipment or parts thereof, such as tar wagons, water trailers, and similar devices as defined in section 575 of the Vehicle Code, 3. Boats, trailers, camper shells, recreational vehicles, jet skis or similar devices, or parts from any of these items, unless exempted in section D6 below. D. Exceptions. The following may be allowed in front yards under the noted circumstances: 1. Waste haulers and recycling containers may be placed for pickup in accordance with Chapter 8.04 of this code. 2. Building materials, vehicles, equipment, or construction tools may be placed in yards during construction with a valid building permit. 3. Personal property owned or rented by the occupants may be repaired, washed, cleaned, and serviced, subject to any other relevant regulations, provided that vehicles are parked in a driveway and that all work is completed within 72 hours. 4. Storage, repair, and maintenance of vehicles or other equipment may be allowed in commercial or agricultural areas visible from a public right-of-way, where these activities are an integral part of the commercial business and are conducted in accordance with all other limitations on that business. 5. Barbecues and furniture that is designed and intended for outdoor use may remain on a porch or in a walled front patio, where the walls are designed in accordance with fence height regulations. 6. Recreational vehicles and trailers with current licenses may be parked in driveways. 17.17.050 Front yard paving. No more than 50% of any residential front yard (see definition of "front yard"), not to exceed 26 feet in width, may be covered by concrete or any other impervious material, including driveways, patio areas, walkways, and other landscape features. Exceptions to this standard can be granted through the Administrative Use Permit process, should the proposed paving be compatible with the neighborhood. (Ord. 1412 – 2002 Series) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 60 17.17.060 Roofs. A. No furniture or equipment, including chairs, mattresses, couches, recreational furniture, or other materials may be placed on any roof, patio cover, carport, shed top, or similar structure, except for the following: 1. Roof-top equipment, including antennas, satellite dishes, masts, poles, heating, ventilation, air conditioning equipment and similar devices that are designed for roof-top installation, and were lawfully installed, may remain on the roof as long as they are properly maintained. 2. Furniture or other equipment may be placed on a roof deck or other similar place that was lawfully designed and created for such use. 17.17.070 Fences. All fencing that is visible from a public right-of-way shall be maintained so that fencing materials and support are structurally sound, with no missing material. 17.17.075 Neighborhood preservation. It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon: 1. Buildings which are abandoned, partially destroyed or damaged or left in an unreasonable state of partial construction, whose owners have been notified by the City that the property has been determined to be in violation of this section. An abandoned building means any building or structure which is not occupied, used or secured for a period of one (1) year or more. A partially destroyed or damaged building means any building or structure in which 25% or more of the structure has been destroyed or damaged and not repaired or replaced for a period of one (1) year or more. An unreasonable state of partial construction is defined as any unfinished building or structure that has been in the course of construction for two (2) years or more, and the condition of said unfinished building or structure or accumulation of construction materials substantially detracts from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. 2. Paint or finish material on the exterior surface of a building or other structure that has become substantially deteriorated, damaged, or unsightly so as to significantly detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. For the purposes of this Chapter, "substantially" shall be defined as the absence or deterioration of a required protective covering exceeding 25% of the exterior surface area, including, but not limited to, chipping, curling, damaged or missing paint. Exterior surfaces shall include gutters, downspouts, trim, doors, window, fences, and walls. 3. Broken, deteriorated, neglected, abandoned, or substantially defaced structures, equipment, machinery, ponds, pools, or excavations visually impacting on the neighborhood or presenting a risk to public safety or nuisance attractive to children. For the purposes of this Chapter, "nuisance attractive to children" shall mean any condition, instrumentality or machine located in a building or on premises, which is or may be unsafe or dangerous to children by reason of their inability to appreciate the peril therein, and which may reasonably be expected to attract children to the premises and risk injury by playing with, in, or on it. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 61 4. Parking lots, driveways, paths or other paved surfaces, except when located in a rear or side yard of a single family dwelling, which contain substantial cracks, potholes or other deficiencies posing a substantial risk of harm to the public. 5. Trees, weeds, or other types of vegetation that are dead, decayed, infested, diseased, overgrown, or harbor rats or vermin and are visible from a public right-of-way. For the purpose of this chapter, "overgrown" is limited to lawns or weeds over 12" in height. Creek, riparian areas, open space, grassland communities, or other sensitive habitat and unique resource areas as defined by the General Plan are subject to separate regulations. 6. Buildings, structures, or other surfaces upon which graffiti exists. Graffiti, as used in this Chapter, shall mean defacement, damage, or destruction by the presence of paint, ink, chalk, dye, or other similar substance; or by carving, etching, or other engraving. 7. Any violation of the provisions of a conditional use permit, planned development permit, architectural review approval, variance or other land use entitlement or land use permit. 8. Maintenance of property in such condition as to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare in such a manner as to constitute a public nuisance as defined by Civil Code Section 3480. (Ord. 1412 – 2002 Series) 17.17.080 Prohibited acts. A. Unlawful acts. It is unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation that owns, occupies or controls property in the City of San Luis Obispo to maintain or fail to maintain such property in violation of Sections 17.17.040, 17.17.050, 17.17.060, or 17.17.070 of this chapter for more than 72 hours. B. Type of offense. Any person who violates Sections 17.17.040, 17.17.050, 17.17.060, 17.17.070, or 17.17.075 of this chapter shall be guilty of an infraction. Violations shall be punishable as set forth in Chapter 1.12 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed or constituted to prevent the City from commencing any civil proceeding otherwise authorized by law for the declaration or abatement of a public nuisance. (Ord. 1412 – 2002 Series) 17.17.090 Private cause of action. If the owner of any premise fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this chapter, it shall constitute a public nuisance, pursuant to Section 8.24.020(B) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. Any aggrieved party may, in addition to any other right or remedy he or she may possess either at law or in equity, pursue a private cause of action to abate a public nuisance, as specified in Section 8.24.190 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 62 Chapter 17.18: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Sections: 17.18.010 Noise. 17.18.020 Vibration. 17.18.030 Illumination. 17.18.040 Air Contaminants. 17.18.050 Discharges to water or public sewer system. 17.18.060 Heat. 17.18.070 Solid waste. 17.18.080 Energy conservation. 17.18.090 General and special conditions. 17.18.010 Noise. A. No use shall be established nor any activity conducted which violates the standards of the Noise Ordinance (Chapter 9.12 of this code). (Ord. 1102 - 1 Ex. A(13), 1987: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(A)) 17.18.020 Vibration. Subject to the exceptions in subsection C of Section 17.18.010, no activity shall be conducted which causes ground vibrations perceptible at the property line. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(B)) 17.18.030 Illumination. No lighting or illuminated device shall be operated so as to create glare which creates a hazard or nuisance on other property. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(C)) 17.18.040 Air contaminants. A. No use or activity shall be conducted without first obtaining any required permit from the County Air Pollution Control District. B. Uses shall be conducted to prevent dust or other airborne material from crossing property lines. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(D)) 17.18.050 Discharges to water or public sewer system. A. Discharges to groundwater or waterways, whether direct or indirect, shall conform with the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California Department of Fish and Game. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 63 B. Discharges to the City sewer system shall conform to Article II of Chapter 13.08 of this code. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(E)) 17.18.060 Heat. No activity shall be conducted which causes radiant heat or a stream of heated air resulting in a temperature increase of more than 20 degrees Fahrenheit at any property line or any public right-of-way. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(F)) 17.18.070 Solid waste. Solid wastes shall be handled and stored so as to prevent nuisances, health and fire hazards, and to facilitate recycling. Suitable containers shall be provided to prevent blowing or scattering of trash by animals. Suitable space and containers shall be provided to encourage on-site sorting and collection of recyclables. (See also Chapter 8.04) (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(G)) 17.18.080 Energy conservation. The use of conventional energy sources for space heating and cooling, water heating, and illumination shall be minimized by means of proper design and orientation, including provision and protection of solar exposure. 17.18.090 General and special conditions. These performance standards are general requirements and shall not be construed to prevent the Director, Council, Planning Commission, or Architectural Review Commission from imposing, as part of project approval, specific conditions which may be more restrictive, in order to meet the intent of these regulations. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.6(H)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 64 Chapter 17.19: BED AND BREAKFAST ESTABLISHMENTS Sections: 17.19.010 Purpose 17.19.020 Definitions 17.19.030 Applications and approval required 17.19.040 General standards 17.19.050 Site development and performance standards in the R-3 and R-4 zones 17.19.060 Site development and performance standards in the AG zone 17.19.070 Findings required 17.19.080 Revocation of a permit 17.19.010 Purpose. To establish standards for the development of bed and breakfast establishments within the residential and agriculture zones of the City upon conforming to set criteria and conditions. The intent of these standards is to ensure that the location, concentration, and design of bed and breakfast establishments is consistent with or does not negatively affect the character or function of the neighborhood and surroundings. 17.19.020 Definitions. Bed and Breakfast Inn: a building or group of buildings providing up to fifteen rooms or suites for the accommodation of travelers, with a common eating area for guests. 17.19.030 Applications and approvals required. A Bed and Breakfast Inn is allowed as specified in Section 17.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. In addition to the applicable Use Permit requirement, review by the Cultural Heritage Committee and Architectural Review Commission may be required depending upon the type of changes proposed to any structure intended for use as a Bed and Breakfast Inn. 17.19.040 General standards. These standards apply to all bed and breakfast homes or inns in the R-3, R-4, and AG zone districts. 1. The use permit is subject to review at any time and may be revoked after a hearing by the Planning Commission and a finding by the Planning Commission that the use has become detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood; 2. A bed and breakfast inn must comply with all other provisions of the zone in which it is located and must comply with all other ordinances of the City; 3. A City business license is required and remittance of transient occupancy tax is required; City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 65 4. Any other conditions deemed essential and desirable by the Planning Commission may be imposed on such a use; 5. The home shall not be used by the public or paying guests for the hosting of receptions, private parties or the like; 6. Meals, if provided, shall be served only to residents and overnight guests of the bed and breakfast home; 7. There shall be no separate or additional kitchen facility for the guests; 8. No alteration shall be allowed to the exterior of the dwelling or yard that alters the residential characteristics of the premises or jeopardizes/eliminates features of historical or architectural significance. Changes to any historical building shall be consistent with the Secretary of Interior Standards and shall be subject to Cultural Heritage Committee and Architectural Review Commission approval; 9. No historical structure shall be removed in order to allow for a bed and breakfast home or inn nor shall such a structure be removed in order to provide parking for such a use; 10. One non-internally illuminated sign may be erected on the property not to exceed ten (10) square feet in size per street frontage. Lighting level shall comply with City sign regulations for the zone district. The sign shall compliment the nature of the use; i.e. historic structures should have an historic style sign. The sign shall contain no information other than identification of the premises as the named bed-and-breakfast home. 17.19.050 Site development and performance standards in the R-3 and R-4 Zones. These additional standards apply to bed and breakfast inns in the R-3 and R-4 zones. 1. The main building of the Bed and Breakfast establishment must be the “primary residence” of the “owner” or “manager” of the bed and breakfast use; 2. Accessory buildings and structures may also be used for bed and breakfast guest rooms; 3. Generally, the minimum parking setback for guest/employee spaces shall be 15 feet from a “street yard” and 5 feet from an “other yard” (yards as defined in §17.16.020). The parking area shall be screened from direct view of the public right-of-way by a completely planted visual barrier; 4. All parking spaces and driveways shall be paved to City standards with decorative materials or, if a historic property, materials which maintain the historical character of the neighborhood and premises; 5. In general, the number of guest rooms permitted should be based on the City’s density unit calculation with a rental room counting as a studio, and shall in no case exceed 15. The manager’s quarters shall be valued based on number of bedrooms but in no case shall be less than 1.0 density unit. The maximum density unit value, less the value of the manager’s quarters shall generally determine the maximum number of guest rooms. Other factors used in determining the appropriate number of guest rooms that may be permitted in any location shall include the relationship of the site to parking, access, character, size and scale of surrounding uses; City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 66 6. Sites with historic structures shall balance outdoor space for guest use with space required for off-street parking needs. 17.19.060 Site development and performance standards in the Agriculture Zone. These additional standards apply to bed and breakfast homes or inns in the Agriculture (AG) zone. 1. The main building of the Bed and Breakfast establishment must be the “primary residence” of the owner or manager of the bed and breakfast use; 2. Accessory buildings and structures may also be used for bed and breakfast guest rooms; 3. The establishment of a bed and breakfast use shall not result in the conversion of land in agricultural production; 4. Factors used in determining the appropriate number of guest rooms that may be permitted in any location shall include the relationship of the site to parking, access, character, size and scale of surrounding uses, and in no case shall the number of guest rooms permitted exceed 15. 17.19.070 Findings required. In approving a Use Permit for a bed and breakfast inn, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: 1. The establishment of the bed and breakfast inn is consistent with the general plan; 2. The establishment of the bed and breakfast inn will not be detrimental to a building, structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, or historical interest or value; 3. The establishment of the bed and breakfast inn does not constitute undue concentration of such establishments that would negatively affect the appearance and/or function of the surrounding neighborhood; and 4. The establishment of the bed and breakfast inn is compatible with and will not be detrimental to the character of the neighborhood and surrounding land uses. These findings shall be in addition to those required for the approval of use permits contained in § 17.58.040. 17.19.080 Revocation of a permit. The owner and/or manager of a bed and breakfast establishment shall fully comply with all conditions related to any permit or approval granted under this section. Failure to comply with any condition shall constitute grounds for revocation. If a condition is not remedied within a reasonable period, the Community Development Director may schedule a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider revocation of the permit. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 67 Chapter 17.20: RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY STANDARDS Sections: 17.20.010 Group housing - Permitted upon approval of use permit. 17.20.020 Group housing - Occupancy limits. 17.20.010 Group housing - Permitted upon approval of use permit. Group housing (such as dormitory, rest home, boardinghouse or fraternity) that is occupied by six or more individuals may be permitted upon approval of whatever type of use permit is required by the zone district provisions. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.7(A)) 17.20.020 Group housing - Occupancy limits. Use permits for group housing shall stipulate a maximum occupancy. For purposes of this section, residential care facilities will not be considered "group housing". The occupancy limits shall reflect habitable space within buildings and available parking and shall not exceed the following standards based on the general plan: TABLE 8: MAXIMUM POPULATION DENSITY FOR EACH ZONE Maximum Population Density Zone (persons per net acre) R-1 21 R-2, O, C-N, C-T 25 R-3 40 R-4, C-R, C-C 55 (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9202.7(B)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 68 Chapter 17.21: SECONDARY DWELLING UNITS Sections: 17.21.010 Purpose. 17.21.020 Definitions. 17.21.030 General requirements. 17.21.040 Performance standards. 17.21.050 Procedure requirements. 17.21.060 Periodic review - Violations. 17.21.010 Purpose. A. This chapter is intended to implement Government Code Section 65852(.150) and (.2), which allows the city to perform administrative architectural review and apply specific development standards to secondary dwelling units in residential zones. B. The city intends to regulate secondary dwelling units as permitted by Section 65852.2(a) of the State Government Code, and other applicable sections. C. The city recognizes opportunities to implement certain policies and programs of the city housing element of the general plan by providing for and regulating secondary dwelling units. D. Implementation of this chapter is meant to expand housing opportunities for low-income and moderate-income or elderly households by increasing the number of rental units available within existing neighborhoods. Secondary dwelling units are intended to provide livable housing at lower cost while providing greater security, companionship and family support for the occupants. 17.21.020 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases have the meanings given them in this section: A. “Administrative use permit” is defined as defined by Chapter 17.58 of this code. B. “Director” means the director of the community development department or his designate. C. “Nonconforming lot” is defined as defined by Chapter 17.12 of this code. D. “Nonconforming use” is defined as defined by Chapter 17.10 of this code. E. “Primary unit” means an existing single-family residential structure that conforms with all zoning regulations in effect, including this chapter. F. “Secondary dwelling unit” means an attached or detached dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and complies with all provisions of this chapter. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation on the same parcel as the primary unit is sited. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 69 G. Studio means a one-room dwelling unit with not more than 450 square feet of gross floor area as defined in Section 17.100. 17.21.030 General requirements. A. Application. Where this chapter does not contain a particular type of standard or procedure, conventional zoning standards and procedures shall apply. B. Areas Where Secondary Dwelling Units Are Allowed. Upon meeting the requirements of this section, secondary dwelling units may be established in the following zones: R-1, R-2, R- 3, and R-4. C. Areas Prohibited. Secondary dwelling units shall not be established in any condominium or planned development project unless specifically addressed in the planned development ordinance as adopted or amended, or any mobile home subdivision, or trailer park, and under no circumstances shall a secondary dwelling unit be allowed, where in the opinion of the director, a resource deficiency exists as defined by Chapter 2.44 of this code. Secondary dwelling units shall not be allowed on non-conforming lots. D. Owner Occupancy. Either the primary unit or secondary dwelling unit must be owner- occupied as an owner’s primary residence. E. No Subdivision of Property. No subdivision of property shall be allowed where a secondary dwelling unit has been established unless the subdivision meets all requirements of zoning and subdivision regulations. Nothing in this section shall prohibit joint ownership of the property where a secondary dwelling unit has been established. F. Sale of Property. This section shall also apply to new owners of property where a secondary dwelling unit has been established if the property is sold. All conditions of the use permit, restrictive covenants and other contractual agreements with the city shall apply to the property and new owners. G. Unit Type Allowed. A secondary dwelling unit may be attached, detached or located within the living area of the primary unit on the lot. H. Size of Secondary Dwelling Unit. The gross floor area of the secondary dwelling unit shall not exceed four hundred fifty square feet and shall meet the definition of a studio apartment as defined by Section 17.04.430. The planning commission may authorize exception to this standard by use permit upon finding that:: 1. The purpose of this chapter is served; 2. Strict compliance with the size limitation would (a) require significant structural modifications that would not be required otherwise; or (b) adversely affect an historic or architecturally significant building. I. Secondary dwelling units are limited to 1 unit per qualifying property. 17.21.040 Performance standards. A. Design Standards. Secondary dwelling units shall conform to all applicable zoning regulations such as height, yards, parking, building coverage, etc., except for density requirements as defined by Zoning Regulations. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 70 1. Secondary dwelling units shall conform to all applicable building and construction codes. 2. Nothing in this section prohibits applicants from requesting exceptions or variances from the strict interpretation of Zoning Regulations to the extent allowed by said regulations for any other use. 3. Secondary dwelling units shall be designed as to provide separate living conditions and provide a safe and convenient environment for the occupants. 4. Secondary dwelling units shall also be architecturally and functionally compatible with the primary unit. (Ord. 1004 - 1 (part), 1984; prior code - 9930) The new structure shall incorporate the traditional architectural characteristics of existing houses in the neighborhood, including window and door spacing, exterior materials, and roof pitch and style. 5. The height of second units should be consistent with surrounding residential structures. Unless adequate setbacks justify otherwise, secondary dwelling units that result in two- story construction shall be setback from the first floor to allow for solar access and reduced overlook. 6. Site planning: Secondary dwelling units should be located behind or above the existing dwelling on the site. Designs that significantly alter the street appearance of the existing residence shall be discouraged. The presence or design of the secondary dwelling unit per se, will not justify granting development exceptions. 7. Private Open Space: A minimum of 250 square feet of private open space must be provided for secondary dwelling units exclusive of a minimum of 250 square feet to be provided for the primary residence on the property. Private open space provided at ground level must have a minimum dimension in every direction of at least 10 feet or 6 feet for spaces above ground level on an elevated deck or balcony. 8. Significant alterations to landform (grading in excess of 300 cubic yards) or removal of native trees or significant landscape trees shall be discouraged for the placement of a secondary dwelling unit. 9. A landscape plan shall be required for new secondary dwelling units. A minimum 5-foot wide landscape planter with screening shrubs shall separate parking areas from adjacent properties. Landscape shrubs and trees shall be required for areas between secondary unit and adjacent properties. 10. Parking: Secondary dwelling units that are 450 square feet or smaller shall require 1 parking space, regardless of zoning district. 11. Alterations to designated historic properties or structures to allow new construction of a secondary dwelling unit shall be reviewed by the Cultural Heritage Committee for consistency with the Secretary of Interior Standards for treatment of a historic property. 17.21.050 Procedure requirements. Prior to filing building plans with the City Building Division, the following shall be met: A. Architectural Review Required. All requests shall receive architectural review in accordance with the adopted Architectural Review Commission ordinance and Community Design Guidelines. The director shall determine, upon receiving complete application, whether the project is declared minor or incidental. In the event the director determines that the project is not minor or incidental, it shall be forwarded to the Architectural Review Commission for review. All new development projects within Historic Districts or within properties that contain designated historic structures shall be referred to the Cultural Heritage City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 71 Committee to be reviewed for consistency with Secretary of Interior Standards for treatment of a historic property. B. Application Contents. All proposed secondary dwelling unit requests shall be by formal application for architectural review. C. Additional Requirements. 1. Owners Agreement with the City. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the city, on a form approved by the city attorney and community development director, agreeing that the property will be owner-occupied. Upon approval of architectural review and a building permit, this agreement shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder to provide constructive notice to all future owners of the property of the use and owner occupancy restrictions affecting the property. If owner occupancy is not possible, then the use will terminate, and the structure will be returned to its original condition to the satisfaction of the director. 2. Property owners receiving approvals for secondary dwelling units and establishing the use pursuant to this section shall also agree to reimburse the city for costs of all necessary enforcement actions. D. Appeal. Appeal procedures for this section shall be as provided by chapter 2.48.080 (Appeals-Architectural Review). 17.21.060 Violations. Violation of any of the provisions shall be basic code enforcement action. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 72 Chapter 17.22: USE REGULATION Section: 17.22.010 Uses allowed by zones. 17.22.010 Uses allowed by zones. A. Status of Uses. Uses within zones shall be as provided in Table 9, subject to parts B through G below. In Table 9, symbols shall have these meanings: A The use is allowed; D If the director approves an administrative use permit as provided in Sections 17.58.020 through 17.58.080, the use may be established; PC If the planning commission approves a use permit as provided in Sections 17.58.020 through 17.58.080, the use may be established; A/D The use is allowed above the ground floor. If the director approves an administrative use permit, it may be established on the ground floor. Special notes affecting the status of uses, indicated by number in Table 9, may be found at the end of the table. B. Interpretation of Use Listing. These regulations are intended to permit similar types of uses within each zone. The director, subject to the appeal procedures of Chapter 17.66, shall determine whether uses which are not listed shall be deemed allowed or allowed subject to use permit approval in a certain zone. This interpretation procedure shall not be used as a substitute for the amendment procedure as a means of adding new types of uses to a zone. C. Principal and Accessory Uses. Listed uses are principal uses. Accessory uses are allowed with principal uses. D. Production and Sales. Where manufacturing is allowed, incidental sale of items made on the premises is allowed. When sale of a particular type of item is allowed, craftsman-type production of such an item for sale on the premises is allowed. E. Public School Uses. See Section 17.36.030 concerning uses which may be established within public schools. F. Prohibition of Drive-through Facilities. Drive-through facilities are not allowed in any zone. G. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency. Some land subject to City zoning is also subject to the Airport Land Use Plan, which is adopted and amended from time to time by the San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Commission. The Airport Land Use Plan establishes additional limitations on uses, which do not apply to City-adopted zones outside the area subject to the Airport Land Use Plan. Table 9 is to be applied consistently with the Airport Land Use Plan on land subject to that plan. Specifically, the following provisions shall apply. 1. Prohibited Uses. No use shall be established which: City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 73 a. Entails installation, construction, or enlargement of a structure that would constitute an obstruction to air navigation, as defined in the Airport Land Use Plan, except as may be approved by the Airport Land Use Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration; b. Entails a risk of physical injury to operators or occupants of aircraft (such as outdoor laser light shows); c. Causes smoke or vapors, lighting, illumination, or reflective glare, or an electromagnetic disturbance that would interfere with aircraft navigation or communication; d. Attracts birds to the extent of creating a significant hazard of bird strikes (examples are outdoor storage or disposal of food or grain, or large, artificial water features; this provision is not intended to prevent enhancement or protection of existing wetlands or the mitigation of wetlands impacts). e. Is not allowed by the noise policies of the Airport Land Use Plan, subject to modified provisions for the Margarita Specific Plan Area; f. Is not allowed by the Airport Land Use Zones (numbered 1 through 6) and the associated Land Use Matrix, subject to modified provisions for the Margarita Specific Plan Area; g. Is not allowed by the Airport Safety Areas and associated safety policies, subject to modified provisions for the Margarita Specific Plan Area. 2. Conditionally Approvable Uses. No use listed as “conditionally approvable” by the Airport Land Use Plan’s Land Use Matrix shall be established until the City has referred the proposed use to the Airport Land Use Commission and that commission has rendered a written determination that the use will be consistent with the Airport Land Use Plan. If a use permit is required by Table 9 of the City’s Zoning Regulations, the Airport Land Use Commission’s determination must be received by the City before the City acts on the use permit. If a use listed as “conditionally approvable” by the Airport Land Use Plan is shown as allowed by Table 9, that use shall be subject to City approval of an administrative use permit following a referral to, and determination by, the Airport Land Use Commission. City approval of the use permit shall incorporate conditions or relevant project description identified by the Airport Land Use Commission in making its determination. The Airport Land Use Commission may determine that a use listed as “conditionally approvable” cannot be made consistent through the incorporation of reasonably available conditions, in which case the use permit shall be denied. 3. Uses not listed in the Airport Land Use Plan. For uses listed in Table 9 but not in the Airport Land Use Plan, the director shall determine which use listed in the Airport Land Use Plan is most similar and the resultant status of the use. The director may consult with the Airport Land Use Commission in making such determinations. 4. Notwithstanding section 17.22.010G. above, the provisions of this section are not intended to supercede the provisions of Article 3.5 of the Public Utilities Code commencing with section 21670. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 74 City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations TABLE 9 - USES ALLOWED BY ZONE Permit Requirement by Zoning District Specific use Land Use AG C/OS R1 R2 R3 R4 PF O (1) C-N C-C C-D C-R C-T C-S M BP Regulations AGRICULTURE Crop production and grazing A A A A D D Greenhouse, commercial PC PC Livestock feed lot PC PC INDUSTRY, MANUFACTURING & PROCESSING, WHOLESALING DA Industrial research and development PC D D(10) PC A AAA Laundry, dry cleaning plant AA Manufacturing - Heavy PC PC Manufacturing - Light DAA Petroleum product storage and distribution D Photo and film processing lab AA Printing and publishing A A A(10) D D Recycling facilities - Small collection facility D D D A Storage yard DA Warehousing, indoor storage AAPC(10) Wholesaling and distribution AAPC(10) LODGING Bed and breakfast inn D PC PC A A A Homeless shelter PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC Hostel PC PC A A A Hotel, motel A A A PC(10) Recreational vehicle (RV) park accessory to hotel, motel PC Key:A = Allowed D = Director's Use Permit approval required PC = Planning Commission Use Permit approval required A/D = Director's approval on ground floor, allowed on second floor or above Note:Footnotes affecting speific land uses follow the table. Page 75 Furniture and fixtures manufacturing, cabinet shop Laboratory - Medical, analytical, research, testing Recycling facilities - Collection and processing facility Recycling facilities - Scrap and dismantling yard City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 TABLE 9 - USES ALLOWED BY ZONE - Continued Permit Requirement by Zoning District Specific use Land Use AG C/OS R1 R2 R3 R4 PF O (1) C-N C-C C-D C-R C-T C-S M BP Regulations RECREATION, EDUCATION, & PUBLIC ASSEMBLY USES Bar/tavern DDDDDD Club, lodge, private meeting hall D D A D A/D D D D Commercial recreation facility - Indoor PC DDDD PCD(10) 17.08.060 Commercial recreation facility - Outdoor PC PC Educational conferences D D D D 17.08.010.C.6 Fitness/health facility D A D D PC A A D(10) Golf Course PC Library, museum PC DDDD Library, branch facility DDDD Night club DDDDDD Chapter 17.95 Park, playground D D AAAADDA AA Public assembly facility PC DDDDPC Religious facility PC DDDDADDDAD(7) D(7) D(7) PC PC School - College, university campus PC School - Elementary, middle, secondary PC PC D D PC D School - Specialized education/training PC A/D A/D A A A Special event DDDDDDDDD 17.08.010 Sports and active recreation facility PC PC PC PC Sports and entertainment assembly facility PC PC Studio - Art, dance, martial arts, music, etc. A/D A/D A PC A Theater PC(8) D D D D(10) Chapter 5.40 Theater - Drive-in PC PC RESIDENTIAL USES Boarding/rooming house, dormitory PC D D D Chapter 17.20 Caretaker quarters AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD Convents and monasteries PC A A D Fraternity, sorority PC PC High occupancy residential use D D Home occupation HHHHHH HHHHHHHH 17.08.090 Live/work units A A A A 17.08.120 Mixed-use project AAAAAAPCPC 17.08.072 AAAAAA AA Mobile home park AAAA Multi-family dwellings A A A D D D AAAAAA AA/D A/DA/DD AAAAAA D A/DA/DD Single-family dwellings A A A(2) A A A D D D Work/live units D D 17.08.120 Key:A = Allowed D = Director's Use Permit approval required PC = Planning Commission Use Permit approval required A/D = Director's approval on ground floor, allowed on second floor or above H = Home Occupation Permit required Note:Footnotes affecting speific land uses follow the table. Page 76 Mobile home as temporary residence at building site Residential care facilities - 6 or fewer residents Residential care facilities - 7 or more residents School - Boarding school, elementary, middle, secondary School - College, university - Satellite classroom facility City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations TABLE 9 - USES ALLOWED BY ZONE - Continued Permit Requirement by Zoning District Specific use Land Use AG C/OS R1 R2 R3 R4 PF O (1) C-N C-C C-D C-R C-T C-S M BP Regulations RETAIL SALES Auto and vehicle sales and rental DAPC Auto parts sales, with installation D(5) A A Auto parts sales, without installation ADA AA Building and landscape materials sales, indoor A A A A A DDA AA DD Convenience store D D D AAAAADDD(10) 17.08.095 Extended hour retail DDDDDDDD Farm supply and feed store PC A A Fuel dealer (propane, etc)DA Furniture, furnishings, and appliance stores A A A A General retail - 2,000 sf or less A(3)AAAA D(3) D A A DAAD DAA PC PC PC Groceries, liquor, specialty foods A(11) A A A PC Mobile home, RV, and boat sales APC Office-supporting retail, 2,000 sf or less AAAAA D(10) D D A A D(10) Outdoor temporary and/or seasonal sales See Section 17.08.020 17.08.020 Produce stand D D A A A A Restaurant AAAAADD Service station (see also "vehicle services") D D D D A 17.08.030 Vending machine See Section 17.08.020 17.08.020 Warehouse stores - 45,000 sf or less gfa D D D Warehouse stores - more than 45,000 sf gfa PC PC PC Key:A = Allowed D = Director's Use Permit approval required PC = Planning Commission Use Permit approval required A/D = Director's approval on ground floor, allowed on second floor or above Note:Footnotes affecting speific land uses follow the table. Page 77 General retail - More than 2,000 sf, up to 15,000 sf General retail - More than 15,000 sf, up to 45,000 sf General retail - More than 45,000 sf, up to 60,000 sf General retail - More than 60,000 sf, up to 140,000 sf Office-supporting retail, More than 2,000, up to 5,000 sf Construction and heavy equipment sales and rental Building and landscape materials sales, outoor City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 TABLE 9 - USES ALLOWED BY ZONE - Continued Permit Requirement by Zoning District Specific use Land Use AG C/OS R1 R2 R3 R4 PF O (1) C-N C-C C-D C-R C-T C-S M BP Regulations SERVICES - BUSINESS, FINANCIAL & PROFESSIONAL ATMs AAAAAAAAA Banks and financial services A A A A D(4) D(4) D(10) Business support services A A A/D A A A A D D D A D(12) D(12) Medical service - Doctor office A A/D A/D A D(12) D(12) Medical service - Extended care PC PC D PC PC D Medical service - Hospital PC PC Office - Accessory AAAAAAAA Office - Business and service A A A/D A D Office - Government D PC A A P Office - Processing D D D D(4) D(4) A Office - Production and administrative A A/D A/D A D(4) D(4) A Office - Professional A A/D A/D A D(10) Office - Temporary See Section 17.08.010.C Photographer, photographic studio A A/D A PC A SERVICES - GENERAL Catering service DDADAA Cemetery, mausoleum, columbarium PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC Copying and Quick Printer Service AAAAA AAA Day care - Day care center D(9) D(9) D(9) D(9) D(9) A A A A/D A D(9) D(9) D(9) D(10) 17.08.100 Day care - Family day care home AAAAAA AAAAAA 17.08.100 Equipment rental A A D(10) DD Homeless shelter PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC 17.01.110 Maintenance service, client site services AAPC Mortuary, funeral home D D A D Personal services AAAADA D(10) Personal services - Restricted DD Public safety facilities PC PC(10) Public utility facilities PC A A 17.08.080 A A D(10) Residential Support Services AAAA Social service organization D A A A A D AAD PC D A A D Vehicle services - Carwash DDPCDD PC PC DD D A A/D A A D Key:A = Allowed D = Director's Use Permit approval required PC = Planning Commission Use Permit approval required A/D = Director's approval on ground floor, allowed on second floor or above Note:Footnotes affecting speific land uses follow the table. Page 78 Veterinary clinic/hospital, boarding, large animal Vehicle services - Repair and maintenance - Minor Repair service - Equipment, large appliances, etc. Veterinary clinic/hospital, boarding, small animal, indoor Medical service - Clinic, laboratory, urgent care Vehicle services - Repair and maintenance - Major Food bank/packaged food distribution center Veterinary clinic/hospital, boarding, small animal, outdoor City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations TABLE 9 - USES ALLOWED BY ZONE - Continued Permit Requirement by Zoning District Specific use Land Use AG C/OS R1 R2 R3 R4 PF O (1) C-N C-C C-D C-R C-T C-S M BP Regulations TRANSPORTATION & COMMUNICATIONS Airport PC PC PC D A D D(10) Antennas and telecommunications facilities PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC D D D 17.16.120 Broadcast studio A A/D A A A A Heliport PC PC PC Parking facility PC(6) PC(6) PC(6) D(6) D(6) D(6) Parking facility - Multi-level PC(6) PC(6) PC(6) PC(6) PC(6) PC(6) Parking facility - Temporary PC DDDDDDDD 17.08.010 Railroad facilities DA Transit station or terminal PC PC PC D A Transit stop AAAAAAAA Truck or freight terminal AAD PC PC Key:A = Allowed D = Director's Use Permit approval required PC = Planning Commission Use Permit approval required A/D = Director's approval on ground floor, allowed on second floor or above Note:Footnotes affecting speific land uses follow the table. Page 79 Ambulance, taxi, and/or limousine dispatch facility Water and wastewater treatment plants and services City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 80 Notes to Table 9: 1. O zone - All uses. A Use Permit is required for the construction of nonresidential structures or the conversion of residential structures to non-residential uses. In order to approve a Use Permit, the Commission shall first find that: a. The location, orientation, height, and mass of new structures will not significantly affect privacy in nearby residential areas; and b. The project location or access arrangements will not significantly direct traffic to local streets in nearby residential areas; and c. The project includes landscaping and yards that adequately separate parking and pedestrian circulation areas from sites in nearby residential areas. 2. R-1 zone - Multiple dwellings. Except for condominiums, the construction of more than one dwelling on a parcel in the R-1 zone requires Administrative Use Permit approval. R-1 density standards apply. 3. C-N zone - Limitations on floor area. A general retail use in the C-N zone shall not exceed a gross floor area of 2,000 square feet for each establishment, or a combined floor area of all general retail establishments within a shopping center of 25 percent of the total floor area in a shopping center with a gross floor area of 15,000 square feet or more; and shall not exceed 50 percent of the total floor area in a shopping center with a gross floor area of less than 15,000 square feet. The Administrative Use Permit may provide for exceptions to the floor area limitations above. For general retail uses with a floor area greater than 2,000 square feet on a parcel not located within a shopping center, an Administrative Use Permit shall be required to insure consistency with policies of the General Plan Land Use Element and compatibility with surrounding uses. 4. C-S and M zones - Required findings for offices. The approval of an office facility in the C-S or M zone shall require that the review authority first find that: a. The project will be compatible with existing and allowed land uses in the area; b. The project location or access arrangements will not significantly direct traffic to use local or collector streets in residential zones; c. The project will provide adequate mitigation to address potential impacts related to noise, light and glare, and loss of privacy, among others, imposed by commercial activities on nearby residential areas, by using methods such as setbacks, landscaping, berming and fencing; d. The project will not preclude industrial or service commercial uses in areas especially suited for these uses when compared with offices; and e. The project will not create a shortage of C-S- or M-zoned land available for service commercial or industrial development. 5. C-R zone - Auto sound system installation. Auto sound installation services may be approved only as an accessory use to the retail sales of auto sound systems on the same site. Use Permit review shall consider parking space displacement, noise from the operation, and the appearance and visibility of the installation area. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 81 6. Parking as a principal use. Use Permit approval may include deviations to otherwise applicable setback requirements and building height limits. A multi-level parking facility shall require the approval of a Use Permit by the Planning Commission. 7. Religious facilities. a. C-S zone requirements. Use Permit review shall consider that the C-S zone is primarily intended to accommodate uses not generally suited to other commercial zones because of noise, truck traffic, visual impacts and similar factors. A Use Permit may be approved only when the religious facility will not likely cause unreasonable compatibility problems with existing or likely future service commercial uses in the vicinity. Use Permit conditions may include measures to mitigate incompatibility. b. C-T and M zone requirements. A religious facility use may be allowed only inside an existing building. 8. PF zone - Theaters. Only non-profit theaters are permitted. 9. Day care centers. Allowed by right where accessory to a church or school, or where an employer provides on-site child care to 14 or fewer children for the exclusive benefit of employees, providing the primary use meets City parking standards. 10. BP zone. See the Airport Area Specific Plan for special use restrictions. 11. Groceries, Liquor, Specialty Foods in the CN Zone. In the C-N zone, grocery, liquor and specialty food stores under 3,000 square feet are allowed. Such uses with a gross floor area between 3,000 and 5,000 square feet are allowed with the approval of an Administrative Use Permit. Stores between 5,000 and 10,000 square feet may be approved by Planning Commission Use Permit. In order for a use permit to be approved by the Hearing Officer or by the Planning Commission, the deciding body must find that the proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses and the surrounding neighborhood, and that the use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Neighborhood Commercial designation as discussed in the General Plan. 12. In order to approve a Medical Service use in the C-S or BP zones, the Hearing Officer must make the following findings: 1) The proposed medical service is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2) The proposed medical service is located along a street designated as an arterial or commercial collector in the Circulation Element and has convenient access to public transportation. 3) The proposed medical service will not significantly increase traffic or create parking impacts in residential neighborhoods. 4) The proposed medical service is consistent with the Airport Land Use Plan. 5) The project will not preclude service commercial uses in areas especially suited for these uses when compared with medical services. 6) The project site can accommodate the parking requirements of the proposed medical service and will not result in other lease spaces being under-utilized because of a lack of available parking. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 82 Chapter 17.24: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) ZONE Sections: 17.24.010 Purpose and application. 17.24.020 Property development standards. 17.24.010 Purpose and application. The R-1 zone is intended primarily to provide housing opportunities for people who want private open space associated with individual dwellings. It is intended to preserve existing single-family neighborhoods, provide for compatible infill development in such areas, and prescribe the overall character of newly subdivided low-density areas. This zone shall be applied to areas designated "low-density residential" on the general plan map. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.1(A)) 17.24.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the R-1 zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: Seven dwellings per net acre (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 25 feet; up to 35 feet if the Director approves an administrative use permit. (See also Section 17.16.020 and Section 17.16.040.) D. Maximum coverage: 40% (see also Section 17.16.030). E. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.1(B)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 83 Chapter 17.26: MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) ZONE Sections: 17.26.010 Purpose and application. 17.26.020 Property development standards. 17.26.010 Purpose and application. The R-2 zone is intended to provide housing opportunities for people who want compact residences close to commercial and public services. These areas will usually lie between zones of higher and lower residential density and/or adjacent to office (O) zones or neighborhood commercial (C-N) zones. This zone will be applied to areas designated "medium-density residential" on the general plan map. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.2(A)) 17.26.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the R-2 zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 12 dwelling units per net acre (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). D. Maximum coverage: 50% (see also Section 17.16.030). E. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.2(B)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 84 Chapter 17.28: MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) ZONE Sections: 17.28.010 Purpose and application. 17.28.020 Property development standards. 17.28.010 Purpose and application. The R-3 zone is intended primarily to provide housing opportunities for smaller households desiring little private open space and to provide various types of group housing. These areas are generally close to commercial and public facilities serving the whole community and generally committed to this type of development. This zone will be applied to areas designated "medium-high-density residential" on the general plan map. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.3(A)) 17.28.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the R-3 zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 18 dwelling units per net acre (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). D. Maximum coverage: 60% (see also Section 17.16.030). E. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.3(B)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 85 Chapter 17.30: HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-4) ZONE Sections: 17.30.010 Purpose and application. 17.30.020 Property development standards. 17.30.010 Purpose and application. The R-4 zone is intended to provide housing opportunities for smaller households desiring little private open space and to provide various types of group housing. It is further intended to allow for concentrations of housing close to concentrations of employment and college enrollment, in areas largely committed to high-density residential development. It will be applied to areas designated "high-density residential" on the general plan map. Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.4(A)) 17.30.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the R-4 zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 24 dwelling units per net acre (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Sections 7.16.020 and 17.16.040). D. Maximum coverage: 60% (see also Section 17.16.030). E. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.4(B)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 86 Chapter 17.32: CONSERVATION / OPEN SPACE (C/OS) ZONE Sections: 17.32.010 Purpose and application. 17.32.020 Property development standards. 17.32.010 Purpose and application. A. The C/OS zone generally will be applied to areas which are most suitable for open space uses because of topography, geology, vegetation, soils, wildlife habitat, scenic prominence, agricultural value or flood hazard. B. The C/OS zone is intended to prevent exposure of urban development to unacceptable risks posed by natural hazards and to protect natural resources from disruptive alterations. To these ends, it is further intended to prevent the subdivision of such lands. C. It will be applied as a permanent zone to areas designated “open space" or "park" on the general plan map. It may also be applied to areas designated "interim open space" where development is contingent on prerequisites identified in the general plan text. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code - 9203.5(A)) 17.32.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the C/OS zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: One dwelling per five or more acres, as indicated in the zone designation. B. Minimum parcel size: Five or more acres, as noted in the number that is part of the zone designation (C/OS-40 requires forty acres). C. Minimum street yard: 20 feet. D. Minimum other yards: 20 feet. E. Maximum height: 35 feet. F. Maximum pavement and building area: Buildings and paved surfaces, such as parking and roads, shall not exceed five percent of site area for a parcel smaller than 10 acres or three percent of site area for a parcel 10 acres or larger. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 87 Chapter 17.33: AGRICULTURAL (AG) ZONE Sections: 17.33.010 Purpose and application. 17.33.020 Property development standards. 17.33.010 Purpose and application. The AG zone is intended to encourage conservation of agricultural lands and continuation of agricultural uses and keeping of livestock where compatible with urban development. It will be applied to areas designated on the general plan map as “conservation/open space” and “interim open space” where there has been a history of agricultural cultivation and keeping of livestock. 17.33.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the AG zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: One dwelling per 20 acres, except that each legal lot of record may have one dwelling. B. Minimum parcel size: Five acres, or more as designated in the zone suffix (AG-20 requires a minimum parcel size of 20 acres) C. Minimum street yard: 20 feet. D. Minimum other yards: 20 feet. E. Maximum height: 35 feet. F. Maximum pavement and building area: Buildings and paved surfaces, such as parking and roads, shall not exceed five percent of site area for a parcel smaller than 10 acres or thee percent of site area for a parcel 10 acres or larger. G. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 88 Chapter 17.34: OFFICE (O) ZONE Sections: 17.34.010 Purpose and application. 17.34.020 Property development standards. 17.34.010 Purpose and application. The O zone is intended to provide for offices and related functions close to medical facilities and the downtown, convenient to public transportation and related government and business services. The O zone is also intended to provide for the continuation and development of residential uses where they will be compatible with neighboring offices. The O zone implements and is consistent with the Office land use category of the General Plan. 17.34.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the O zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 12 dwelling units per net acre (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 25 feet; 35 feet with the approval of an administrative use permit in compliance with Section 17.22.010, Table 9, Footnote 11 (Also see Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040.) D. Maximum coverage: 60% (see also Section 17.16.030) E. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed 1.5. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) F. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 1088 - 1 Ex. A(4), 1987; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.6(B)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 89 Chapter 17.36: PUBLIC FACILITY (PF) ZONE Sections: 17.36.010 Purpose and application. 17.36.020 Property development standards. 17.36.030 Public school tenant uses. 17.36.010 Purpose and application. A. The PF zone is intended to provide for the wide range of public uses likely to be located on public property. Public uses are those conducted by governmental or nonprofit agencies. However, this zone will also provide for complementary private and commercial uses which, within the overall guidance of the general plan, provide a public benefit. B. The zone is further intended to protect neighboring private uses from potentially incompatible public uses. It will be applied to areas designated "public " and "park" on the general plan map. (Ord. 1016 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.7(A)) 17.36.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the PF zone are as follows: A. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. B. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). C. Maximum coverage: 60% (see also Section 17.16.030). D. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed: z for a parcel adjacent to a C-C zone: 2.0; z for a parcel not adjacent to a C-C zone: 1.0 (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) E. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 1016 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.7(B)) 17.36.030 Public school tenant uses. A. Purpose, Scope and Duration. In order to allow more complete use of space made available by declining enrollment, certain commercial activities may be established in the public schools in addition to the uses listed in Table 9 (Section 17.22.010) of these regulations. Notwithstanding any other provisions of these regulations to the contrary and in conformance with the general plan, the following provisions shall apply to such uses. The Director may act to extend all temporary permits, regardless of the type of permit. B. Uses Allowed by Public School Tenant Permit. The Director approves public school tenant permits subject to the standards in subsection F of this section. The Director may City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 90 establish conditions to further the intent of this section. A public notice shall be posted at the site of each proposed school tenant use. If anyone informs the Community Development Department of a question or objection concerning the proposed school tenant use, that cannot be resolved by staff to the satisfaction of the complainant, within five days of the posting, the Director shall schedule a hearing for the application as provided for administrative use permits. If no questions or objections are received by the Community Development Department that cannot be resolved, the Director may issue the permit upon submission of all required information and without further notice or public hearing. The following uses may be established by school tenant permits within public schools in the PF zone: 1. Public educational programs different from those normally conducted at the school, such as full-time, adult programs at an elementary school; 2. Private educational programs, such as professional, vocational or recreational classes; 3. Storage of furnishings and records; 4. Telephone answering or paging service; 5. Stenographic, court reporting, typing, graphic design, editing and translating services; 6. Child day care. C. Uses Allowed with Administrative Approval. If the Director approves an administrative use permit, as provided in Sections 17.58.020 through 17.58.080, subject to the standards in subsection F of this section, the following uses may be established within public schools in the PF zone: 1. Employee organization offices; 2. Government agency administrative offices with infrequent visitation; 3. Youth, adult and charitable service organizations; 4. Photography studio or art studio; 5. Office for equipment sales or repair, excluding on-site sales or vehicle repair; 6. Clothing repair or alteration and repair of small appliances, watches, musical instruments and similar items. D. Uses Allowed with Planning Commission Approval. If the Planning Commission approves a use permit, as provided in Section 17.58.080, subject to the standards in subsection F of this section, the following uses may be established within public schools in the PF zone: 1. Travel or ticket agency; 2. Duplicating, mailing and direct distribution (private postal) services. E. Other Uses Allowed. Other uses may be allowed, or allowed with administrative or Planning Commission approval. The Community Development Director must determine that the use is similar in character and impacts on its surroundings to one of those listed in subsections B, C or D of this section. F. Standards. The following standards shall be conditions of approval for all types of permits. Whether these standards can reasonably be met shall be considered when deciding if a use permit should be approved for a specific use in a specific location: 1. Parking as required by Section 17.16.060 shall be provided; City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 91 2. There will be adequate space for the function itself and supporting activities such as parking, in addition to all other activities previously established at the school; 3. The use will not require structural changes to the school building, inconsistent with future school use of the building, unless there is written guarantee the building will be restored for school use upon termination of the lease or permit; 4. There will be minimal customer, client or delivery traffic; 5. Clients or customers shall not visit the leased space between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.; 6. There will be minimal employee activity at night and on weekends; 7. Activities shall be conducted entirely within the school building or on established playing fields and shall not alter the appearance of the building or the playing fields, except as provided in standard 3 of this subsection; 8. No vehicle larger than a three-quarter-ton truck may be used by the tenant at the lease site; 9. Activities conducted and materials or equipment used shall not change the fire-safety or occupancy classifications of the premises, nor use utilities in amounts greater than normally provided for school use; 10. No use shall cause noise, dust, vibration, offensive smell, smoke, glare or electrical interference, or other hazard or nuisance; 11. All uses must meet Fire Department standards for access, hydrant locations, and fire flow prior to occupancy, (Ord. 1016 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.7(C)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 92 Chapter 17.38: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (C-N) ZONE Sections: 17.38.010 Purpose and application. 17.38.020 Property development standards. 17.38.010 Purpose and application. The C-N zone is intended to provide for retail sales and personal services primarily for the convenience of surrounding residential areas, in small-scale, pedestrian-oriented developments. Individual, small-scale retail establishments should provide several types of merchandise (as in the example of a neighborhood market providing groceries, household items, magazines, etc.), as opposed to a business offering a wide selection of a single type of merchandise (for example, shoes, books, etc.). The C-N zone implements and is consistent with the Neighborhood Commercial land use category of the General Plan. 17.38.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the C-N zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 12 units per net acre (see Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). D. Maximum coverage: 75% (see also Section 17.16.030). E. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed 2.0. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) F. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060.(Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.8(B)) G. Maximum Building Size: No retail establishment (commercial building) shall exceed 45,000 square feet of total gross floor area, unless excepted by Section 17.16.035. (Ord. 1405 – 2001 Series) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 93 Chapter 17.40: RETAIL-COMMERCIAL (C-R) ZONE Sections: 17.40.010 Purpose and application. 17.40.020 Property development standards. 17.40.010 Purpose and application. The C-R zone is intended to provide for a wide range of retail sales, business, personal, and professional services, as well as recreation, entertainment, transient lodging, and some residential uses. The land uses allowed in this zone will generally serve the entire community and the region, as well as tourists and travelers. The C-R zone implements and is consistent with the General Retail land use category of the General Plan, and is intended to be applied primarily to areas with more public exposure on arterial streets than those reserved for manufacturing. 17.40.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the C-R zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 36 units per net acre for all dwellings, including dwelling units in hotels and motels, but not including other hotel or motel units (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Maximum street and other yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 45 feet (see also Section 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). D. Maximum coverage: 100%. E. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed 3.0, except that in the downtown as mapped in the General Plan Land Use Element, a site which receives transfer of development credit for open space protection shall have a ratio not to exceed 4.0. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) F. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.9(B)) G. Maximum Building Size: No retail establishment (commercial building) shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross floor area, unless excepted by subsection “H” and Section 17.16.035. H. A retail establishment may be allowed up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area, if the Planning Commission determines that it meets the following standards: 1. The proposed use will serve the community, in whole or in significant part, and the nature of the use requires a larger size in order to function. 2. The building in which the use is to be located is designed in discrete-elements that respect the scale of development in the surrounding area. 3. The new building is designed in compliance with the City’s Design Guidelines for Large- Scale Retail Projects. (Ord. 1405 – 2001 Series) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 94 CHAPTER 17.41: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (C-C) ZONE Sections: 17.41.010 - Purpose and Application 17.41.020 - Property Development Standards 17.41.010 Purpose and Application The CC zone is intended to provide for a wide range of retail sales and personal services within the context of distinctive, pedestrian-oriented shopping centers that serve customers and clients from all over the City. The C-C zone implements and is consistent with the Community Commercial land use category of the General Plan. 17.41.020 - Property Development Standards The property development standards for the C-C zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 36 units per net acre (see Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). D. Maximum coverage: 75 percent (see also Section 17.16.030). E. Maximum floor area ratio: The ratio of gross floor area to site area shall not exceed 2.0. F. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 95 Chapter 17.42: DOWNTOWN-COMMERCIAL (C-D) ZONE Sections: 17.42.010 Purpose and application. 17.42.020 Property development standards. 17.42.010 Purpose and application. The C-D zone is intended to provide for a wide range of retail sales, service, and entertainment uses meeting community-wide and regional market demands. The C-D zone is intended to be applied within the City's pedestrian-oriented central business district, where the historical pattern of development creates limitations on building form and the ability for individual businesses to provide on-site parking. Ground floor, street-fronting uses are intended to be generally limited to those that attract frequent pedestrian traffic. The C-D zone is intended to maintain, enhance, and extend the desirable characteristics of the downtown, and also to accommodate carefully integrated new development. The C-D zone is consistent with and implements the General Retail land use category of the General Plan. 17.42.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the C-D zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 36 units per acre, including dwelling units in hotels and motels, but not including other hotel or motel units (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum height: 50 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). D. Maximum coverage: 100%. E. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed 3.0, except that a site which receives transfer of development credit for open space protection shall have a ratio not to exceed 4.0. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) F. Parking: Other sections of this Title notwithstanding, the Parking Requirements in the C-C zone shall be as follows: 1. Restaurants, sandwich shops, take-out food, bars, taverns, night clubs, other food service or entertainment establishments, theaters, auditoriums, convention halls, and churches: one-half that required in Section 17.16.060 provided, however, that in no case the requirement shall exceed one space per 350 square feet gross floor area. 2. Dwellings, motels, hotels and bed and breakfast inns: One-half that required in Section 17.16.060. 3. All other uses: One space per 500 square feet gross floor area. 4. In determining the total number of required spaces, all fractions shall be rounded to the nearest whole number. Fractions of.5 or greater shall be rounded to 1; fractions less that .5 shall be rounded to 0. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 96 5. For existing buildings, only the parking needed for additions thereto or for changes in occupancy which increase parking requirement relative to prior uses, shall be required. 6. The parking space requirement may be met by: a. Providing the required spaces on the site occupied by the use; b. Providing the required spaces off-site, but within 500 feet of the proposed use, in a lot owned or leased by the developer of the proposed use; c. Participating in a commonly held and maintained off-site parking lot where other businesses maintain their required spaces; d. Participating in a parking district that provides parking spaces through a fee or assessment program. (This subsection may be satisfied by participation of the underlying property in a parking district by January 1, 1988. If by that date the underlying property is not participating in such a district, the parking requirement shall be otherwise met); e. Participating in an in-lieu fee program as may be established by the City Council. Any parking agreement approved prior to adoption of the parking standards contained in Sections F.1-3 above, may be adjusted to conform with those standards, subject to approval by the Community Development Director and City Attorney; or f. Any combination of subsections F.4.a. through F.4.e of this section. The Community Development Department shall be notified of the expiration or termination of any agreement securing required parking. The Department shall schedule a public hearing before the planning commission to consider revocation of the use authorization where no alternative location for required parking is provided. (Ord. 1101 - 2, 1987; Ord. 1074 - 2, 1986: Ord. 1050 - 1 (part), 1985: Ord. 1023 - 1 1984; Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984; Ord. 1941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.10(B)) G. Maximum Building Size: No retail establishment (commercial building) shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross floor area, unless excepted by subsection H and Section 17.16.035. H. A retail establishment may be allowed up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area, if the Planning Commission determines that it meets the following standards: 1. The proposed use will serve the community, in whole or in significant part, and the nature of the use requires a larger size in order to function. 2. The building in which the use is to be located is designed in discrete-elements that respect the scale of development in the surrounding area. 3. The new building is designed in compliance with the City’s Design Guidelines for Large- Scale Retail Projects. (Ord. 1405 – 2001 Series) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 97 Chapter 17.44: TOURIST-COMMERCIAL (C-T) ZONE Sections: 17.44.010 Purpose and application 17.44.020 Property development standards. 17.44.010 Purpose and application The C-T zone is intended to provide accommodations and services for the traveling public. The C-T zone implements and is consistent with the Tourist Commercial land use category of the General Plan. 17.44.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the C-T zone are as follows: A. Maximum density: 12 units per net acre, including dwelling units in hotels and motels, but not including other hotel or motel units (see also Section 17.16.010). B. Yards: See Section 17.16.020. C. Maximum coverage: 75% (see also Section 17.16.030). D. Maximum height: 45 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). E. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed 2.5. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) F. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part). 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.11(B)) G. Maximum Building Size: No retail establishment (commercial building) shall exceed 45,000 square feet of total gross floor area, unless excepted by Section 17.16.035. (Ord. 1405 – 2001 Series) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 98 Chapter 17.46: SERVICE-COMMERCIAL (C-S) ZONE Sections: 17.46.010 Purpose and application. 17.46.020 Property development standards. 17.46.010 Purpose and application. The C-S zone is intended to provide for services, limited retail, and other business service uses that may be less appropriate in the City's other commercial zones, as well as accommodating certain storage, transportation, wholesaling and light manufacturing uses. The C-S zone implements and is consistent with the Services and Manufacturing land use category of the General Plan, and is intended to be applied primarily to areas with more public exposure on arterial streets than those reserved for manufacturing. 17.46.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the C-S zone are as follows: A. Yards. Minimum street yards shall be: 1. Where no building adjoins, five feet (requirement for parking lots and signs); 2. For buildings 20 feet and less in height, 10 feet; 3. For buildings more than 20 feet in height, 15 feet; 4. Other yards shall be as provided in the zone of any adjacent lot; 5. See also Section 17.16.020. B. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Section 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). C. Maximum coverage: 75% (see also Section 17.16.030). D. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed 1.5. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) E. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. F. Off-street loading requirements: Gross Floor Area Number of Spaces of Building Required 1,000 to 9,999 none 10,000 to 29,999 1 30,000 to 99,999 2 100,000 and more 3 G. Maximum Building Size: No retail establishment (commercial building) shall exceed 60,000 square feet of gross floor area, unless excepted by Section 17.16.035. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 99 Chapter 17.48: MANUFACTURING (M) ZONE Sections: 17.48.010 Purpose and application. 17.48.020 Property development standards. 17.48.010 Purpose and application. The M zone is intended to provide for assembly, fabrication, and other manufacturing activities in addition to those permitted in the C-S zone, and for limited sales and services to local consumers. The M zone implements and is consistent with the Services and Manufacturing land use category of the General Plan, and is intended to be applied primarily to areas served by, but with limited or no frontage on arterial streets. 17.48.020 Property development standards. The property development standards for the M zone are as follows: A. Yards. Minimum street yards shall be: 1. Where no building adjoins, five feet (requirement for parking lots and signs); 2. For buildings 20 feet and less in height, 10 feet; 3. For buildings more than 20 feet in height, 15 feet; 4. Other yards shall be as provided in the zone of any adjacent lot; 5. See also Section 17.16.020. B. Maximum height: 35 feet (see also Sections 17.16.020 and 17.16.040). C. Maximum coverage: 75% (see also Section 17.16.030). D. Maximum floor area ratio: the ratio of gross building floor area to site area shall not exceed 1.5. (Ord. 1365 (200 Series) (Part)) E. Parking requirements: See Section 17.16.060. F. Off-street loading requirements: Gross Floor Area Number of Spaces of Building Required 1,000 to 9,999 none 10,000 to 29,999 1 30,000 to 99,999 2 100,000 and more 3 (See also Performance Standards, Chapter 17.18.) (Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A(part), 1987; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.13(B)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 100 CHAPTER 17.50: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONE Sections: 17.50.010 - Purpose 17.50.020 - Applicability 17.50.030 - Decision and Findings 17.50.010 - Purpose The PD overlay zone is intended to provide for flexibility in the application of zoning standards to proposed development. The purpose is to allow consideration of innovation in site planning and other aspects of project design, and more effective design responses to site features, land uses on adjoining properties, and environmental impacts, than the development standards of the underlying zone would produce without adjustment. The City expects each planned development project to be of significantly higher design quality, including more effective and attractive pedestrian orientation, environmental sensitivity, energy efficiency, and the more efficient use of resources, than would be achieved through conventional design practices and standards. 17.50.020 - Applicability A. Timing of rezoning. PD rezoning shall occur simultaneously with the approval of a specific project through the Planned Development process (Chapter 17.62). B. Where allowed. The PD zone may be applied to any parcel within the CN, CC, CD, CR, CT, CS, and M zones; and in any other zone, to any parcel or contiguous parcels of at least one acre. C. General Plan compliance. The preparation, review, and approval of a PD overlay zone shall require strict compliance with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. D. Relationship of PD overlay to primary zoning district. 1. Allowable land uses. Any use or combination of uses allowed by Section 17.22.010 (Uses Allowed by Zones) within the underlying zoning district may be established within the PD overlay zone, subject to any additional limitations on specific land uses provided by the overlay as adopted. No PD overlay shall allow a land use that is not allowed in the primary zoning district, or by the General Plan or any applicable specific plan. 2. Planning permit requirements. Development and new uses within the PD overlay district shall obtain the permits required by Section 17.22.010 for the underlying zone. 3. Site planning and project development standards. Development and new land uses within the PD overlay shall comply with all applicable development standards of the underlying zone, except as specifically modified, waived, or augmented by the PD overlay. E. Scope of approval. The application of the PD overlay to property may include the adjustment or modification, where necessary and justifiable, any applicable development standard of these Zoning Regulations (e.g., building height, floor area ratio, parcel size, parking, setbacks, etc.), or of the City's Subdivision Regulations. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 101 Chapter 17.52: SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) OVERLAY ZONE Sections: 17.52.010 Purpose and application. 17.52.020 Allowed uses. 17.52.030 Property development standards. 17.52.010 Purpose and application. The SP zone is intended to translate the provisions of an adopted specific plan into regulations for the subsequent development of land. It will be applied to areas for which a specific plan has been adopted or where the general plan calls for a specific plan prior to development, generally within residential expansion areas. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.15(A)) 17.52.020 Allowed uses. Prior to adoption of a specific plan, areas in the SP zone may be used in conformance with the provisions of the C/OS zone. Once a specific plan has been adopted, uses shall be as provided in the specific plan. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.15(B)) 17.52.030 Property development standards. A. Residential density shall be as provided in the specific plan. B. Height, yards, coverage and parking shall be as provided in the specific plan. If the specific plan does not contain explicit provisions on these items, they shall be provided in the underlying zone. C. Other development features explicitly contained in the specific plan, such as landscaping, building siting and form, and circulation, shall be as provided in the specific plan. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.15(C)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 102 Chapter 17.54: HISTORICAL PRESERVATION (H) ZONE Sections: 17.54.010 Purpose and Application 17.54.020 Allowed Uses 17.54.030 Property Development Standards 17.54.010 Purpose and application. A. The H zone identifies parcels, areas or structures that (1) are architecturally or historically important, and (2) may be eligible for benefits offered through the City's Historical Preservation Program. B. The H zone may be applied to areas with any of the following characteristics: 1. The property is within an area where buildings with pre-1941 architectural styles create a recognizable character. 2. The property or area contains structures which (a) are good or excellent examples of pre-1941 architecture, or (b) were designed by eminent architects or designers, or (c) are community architectural landmarks. 3. The property or area contains structures that are included in the City's Master List of Historical Resources. 4. The property, area or structure was owned or occupied by someone who had a significant role in the history of the city, region, state or nation. (Ord. 1086 - 1 Ex. A(part), 1987) 17.54.020 Allowed uses. Uses shall be as provided in the underlying zone. (Ord. 1086 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987) 17.54.030 Property development standards. Property Development Standards shall be as established by the underlying zone. (Ord. 1086 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 103 CHAPTER 17.55: MIXED USE (MU) OVERLAY ZONE Sections: 17.55.010 - Purpose 17.55.020 - Application and procedure 17.55.030 - Property development standards 17.55.010 - Purpose The MU overlay zone, in combination with any other zone, requires a mix of residential and nonresidential uses on the same site, where mixed use development would otherwise be optional. The primary purpose of the MU overlay is to provide a means for the City to identify areas where the public health, safety, and welfare will be enhanced by requiring that all allowed development be in the form of mixed use projects, where ground floor street frontages are occupied by retail, business or personal services uses with residential uses above, or to the rear of a site. The MU overlay is intended to promote a compact city, to provide additional housing opportunities (including affordable housing opportunities), which is the first priority, and to reduce auto travel by providing services, jobs, and housing in proximity. The City desires the safety provided by having residential components in commercial areas. 17.55.020 - Application and Procedure A. Application of the MU overlay may be initiated by the City Council or Planning Commission, to ensure that mixed residential and commercial uses will be included when certain parcels are developed or redeveloped, or by a property owner. B. An ordinance adopting an MU overlay shall specify the following items and may include any other standard that would further the purpose and intent of this chapter: 1. The types of uses which are required or allowed to be combined; 2. Any standards for the uses locations or their relationships to each other; and/or 3. Any issues specific to the site or the intended combination of uses which must be resolved by the design of the project. C. Each land use proposed on a site subject to the MU overlay shall be authorized in compliance with the permit requirements of Section 17.22.010 (Uses Allowed by Zones) that apply to the underlying zone. 17.55.030 - Property Development Standards Property development standards shall be those of the underlying zone, except that the application of the MU overlay to property may include establishing a higher height limit than the underlying zone, to more effectively accommodate the residential component of a mixed use project. Proposed development and new land uses shall also comply with all applicable provisions of Section 17.08.072 (Mixed Use Projects). City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 104 Chapter 17.56: SPECIAL CONSIDERATION (S) ZONE Sections: 17.56.010 Purpose and application. 17.56.020 Allowed uses. 17.56.030 Property development standards. 17.56.040 Procedure - Subdivisions - Waiver of use permit requirement when property subject to subdivision map application. 17.56.010 Purpose and application. The S zone has two purposes: A. In combination with any zone, to require approval of an administrative use permit before any use may be established. The use permit requirement is intended to assure compatibility of the use with its surroundings or conformance with the general plan, or to determine if a proposed development solves problems such as noise exposure, flood hazard, airport hazard, or slope instability which are particularly severe on a given site. Such development review may also be used to protect areas of scenic or ecological sensitivity, wildlife habitat, or wildland fire hazard. The ordinance adopting the S zone will specify the considerations to be addressed, and the ordinance number will be incorporated in the official zone map designation: B. In combination with any other zone, to require a larger minimum parcel size than required by the underlying zone. In such cases it will be designated on the zone map as, for example, R-1-S-3, which indicates a minimum parcel size of three acres. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.17(A)) 17.56.020 Allowed uses. Subject to approval of an administrative use permit, any allowed or conditionally allowed use in the underlying zone may be established. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.17(B)) 17.56.030 Property development standards. As provided in Sections 17.58.020 through 17.58.080, the Administrative Hearing Officer may establish conditions relating to improvements, building location, access, and so on, which are more restrictive than provided in the underlying zone, in order to fulfill the intent of these regulations. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.17(C)) 17.56.040 Procedure - Subdivisions - Waiver of use permit requirement when property subject to subdivision map application. The Director may waive the requirement for a use permit when property proposed for development is the subject of a subdivision map application. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9203.17(D)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 105 Chapter 17.58: USE PERMITS Sections: 17.58.010 Purpose and intent. 17.58.020 Application form. 17.58.030 Procedures. 17.58.040 Findings. 17.58.050 Conditions of approval. 17.58.060 Criteria for approval. 17.58.070 Requirement for and compliance with use permits. 17.58.010 Purpose and intent. It is intended that use permits allow flexibility in providing for, regulating, or preventing various uses, so they will be compatible with existing or desired conditions in their neighborhoods. Use permit approval is required for certain uses so that their detrimental effects can be reduced or avoided and potential conflicts in land use can be prevented. This is necessary because of the wide variety of uses that are allowed within zone districts and because of the variety of existing sites and uses found in the community. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.2(A)) 17.58.020 Application form. Application shall be made to the Community Development Department in the form prescribed by the Director, including, as may be necessary, site plans, written descriptions of activities to be conducted, technical studies of site characteristics, and so on. (Ord. 941 - (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.2(B)) 17.58.030 Procedures. A. Administrative Use Permit. 1. Before acting on any use permit application, the Director shall hold a hearing at which information and arguments may be presented. Notice of the time, date, place and purpose of the hearing shall be given by posting the property and by publishing an advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation at least five days before the hearing. 2. Decisions of the Director shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the hearing. They shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The Director's decision shall be final unless appealed. 3. At his or her discretion, the Director may refer an administrative use permit to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the requirements in subsection B of this section, when he/she determines the application involves a major policy issue or public controversy that would be resolved more suitably by the Commission. B. Planning Commission Use Permits. 1. Before acting on any use permit application, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing conducted according to its By-Laws. Notice of the time, date, place and purpose City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 106 of the hearing shall be given by posting the property and publishing an advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten days before the hearing. 2. Decisions of the Planning Commission shall be rendered in writing within ten days of the hearing. They shall state the conditions of approval, if any, or the reasons for denial. The Planning Commission's decision shall be final unless appealed. 3. When a use permit or variance is before the Planning Commission, the Commission may act to impose additional or relax any property development standards capable of being so altered under relevant sections of these regulations (see Chapters 17.16 and 17.60). The intent of this provision is to enable the Commission to deal with various aspects of project design in a comprehensive way, without postponement of action on a project for separate hearings. Use permit and variance findings and procedures shall apply as provided in relevant sections of these regulations. 4. Public notice for use permit and variance applications, in order to fulfill the intent of this section, shall be sufficiently general so the public will be aware of the type of project proposed and the types of actions the Commission may take, without further notice, to approve or conditionally approve the project. 5. Likewise, on appeal, the Council may act to alter property development standards by variance or use permit if a variance or use permit application is under consideration, (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.2(C)) C. Expiration of use permit. 1. When a use, that was allowed by approval of a use permit, ceases operation for one year or such other time period as specified in the conditions of approval, then reinstatement of that use will be allowed only with approval of a new use permit. 2. The Community Development Director may extend the one-year limit stated in C.1, above, upon receipt of a written request, upon finding that circumstances have not changed significantly since the time the use ceased operation. 17.58.040 Findings. In order to grant a use permit, the Director or Planning Commission, or on appeal, the Council, must find that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of persons working or living at the site or within the vicinity. The Director, Planning Commission or Council may deny the proposal or attach conditions as deemed necessary to secure the purposes of these regulations. Actions on use permits shall be justified by written findings, based on substantial evidence in view of the whole record. (Ord. 1124 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1988; Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.2(D)) 17.58.050 Conditions of approval. Conditions imposed by the Director, Planning Commission or Council may include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Modification or limitation to activities, including times and types of operation; B. Special yards or open spaces; C. Fences, walls or landscape screens; D. Provision and arrangement of parking and vehicular and pedestrian circulation; City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 107 E. On-site or off-site street, sidewalk or utility improvements and maintenance agreements; F. Noise generation and attenuation; G. Dedication of right-of-way or easements or access rights; H. Arrangement of buildings and use areas on the site; I. Special hazard reduction measures, such as slope planting; J. Minimum site area; K. Other conditions which may be found necessary to address unusual site conditions. L. Establishment of an expiration date, after which the use must cease at that site. M. Recycling and solid waste plans. N. Conditions may not be imposed that restrict the use to a specific person or group. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.2(E)) 17.58.060 Criteria for approval. In deciding whether a proposal is acceptable at a given location, the Director, Planning Commission and Council shall consider whether the proposal could be established and maintained without jeopardy to persons or property within or adjacent to the proposed site and without damage to the resources of the site and its surroundings. Appropriate criteria may be found in the following sources, without limitation: A. General plan elements (such as Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Noise, Seismic Safety, Public Safety, Open Space and Conservation): B. Specific plans and special studies; C. Standards and recommendations of agencies commenting on environmental documents for the proposal or for similar projects. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.2(F)) 17.58.070 Requirement for and compliance with use permits. A. For any given development or proposed use, When more than one use permit - including more than one type of use permit - is required by individual sections of these regulations, only one use permit application need be filed and acted upon. If both an administrative use permit or permits would simultaneously be required by separate sections, one Planning Commission use permit shall be processed to cover all requirements. If both an administrative use permit or permits for site development exceptions, and review by the Architectural Review Commission are required, then only the architectural review application need be filed. B. The modification or addition to a use requiring use-permit approval shall itself be subject to use-permit approval. The addition of an allowed use to a premises occupied by a conditionally allowed use shall require use-permit approval of the type required for the existing use. The Director shall determine when such an addition or change is of such a City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 108 minor or incidental nature that the intent of these regulations can be met without further use permit control. C. Any conditions established pursuant to these regulations shall be met before the use is established, except that the Director, Planning Commission, or on appeal, the Council, may establish a schedule for certain conditions to be met after establishment of the use. Continuance of the use shall then be contingent on complying with the schedule for meeting deferred conditions. D. If the use or structure authorized by use permit is not established within one year of the date of approval or such longer time as may be stipulated as a condition of approval, the use permit shall expire. Upon written request received prior to expiration, the Director may grant renewals of use permit approval for successive periods of not more than one year each. Approvals of such renewals shall be in writing and for a specific period. Renewals may be approved with new or modified conditions upon a finding that the circumstances under which the use permit was originally approved have substantially changed. Renewal of a use permit shall not require public notice or hearing, unless the renewal is subject to new or modified conditions. In order to approve a renewal, the Director must make the findings required for initial approval. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.2(G)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 109 Chapter 17.60: VARIANCES Sections: 17.60.010 Intent. 17.60.020 Scope. 17.60.030 Procedure. 17.60.040 Findings. 17.60.050 Expiration. 17.60.010 Intent. The variance procedure is intended to allow minor relaxation by the Director of certain standards that would otherwise prevent a property from being used in the same manner as other, similar property, where the intent of these regulations is not compromised by such minor relaxation. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.3(A)) 17.60.020 Scope. Yards, height limits, coverage and parking space requirements may be relaxed. No variance to use regulations or density standards may be granted. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.3(B)) 17.60.030 Procedure. A. Application shall be in the form prescribed by the Director, shall state the precise nature of the grounds for the variance sought, and shall generally follow the form established for use permits. B. Notification requirements and actions of the Director shall be as provided for administrative use permits in Section 17.58.030A. (See also Section 17.58.030B3. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.3(C)) 17.60.040 Findings. In order to approve a variance, the Director, Planning Commission or Council must make each of the following findings: A. That there are circumstances applying to the site, such as size, shape or topography, which do not apply generally to land in the vicinity with the same zoning; B. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege - an entitlement inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning; C. That the variance will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working on the site or in the vicinity. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.3(D)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 110 17.60.050 Expiration. If the entitlement authorized by variance is not established within one year of the date of approval or such longer time as may be stipulated as a condition of approval, the variance shall expire. Upon written request received prior to expiration, the Director may grant renewals of variance approval for successive periods of not more than one year each. Approvals of such renewals shall be in writing and for a specific period. Renewals may be approved with new or modified conditions upon a finding that the circumstances under which the variance was originally approved have substantially changed. Renewal of a variance shall not require public notice or hearing, unless the renewal is subject to new or modified conditions. In order to approve a renewal, the Director must make the findings required for initial approval. (Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: prior code - 9204.3(E)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 111 Chapter 17.62: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Sections: 17.62.010 Preliminary development plan. 17.62.020 Actions of the Planning Commission. 17.62.030 Actions of the Council. 17.62.040 Required findings. 17.62.050 Requirement for development plan. 17.62.060 Final development plan. 17.62.070 Phasing. 17.62.080 Amendment of final development plan. 17.62.090 Revocation of PD zoning. 17.62.010 Preliminary development plan. Application for planned development shall be made to the Community Development Department and shall consist of a preliminary development plan, to include: A. A legal description of the total site involved; B. A statement of the objectives to be achieved by the planned development through the particular approach to be used by the applicant; C. A schedule indicating the approximate dates when construction of the development or stages of the development are to be started and completed; D. A quantified description of the total number and type of dwelling units, parcel sizes, coverage, modified and natural open space, grading, residential densities, and areas devoted to nonresidential uses; E. Identification of portions of the development which would otherwise require a variance, and reason for the deviation from normal standards; F. A site plan and supporting maps, drawn to a suitable scale and clearly labeled, showing, if applicable: 1. Existing site conditions, including contours, vegetation and water courses; 2. Proposed lot designs; 3. Location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings or outlines of areas within which buildings may be located; 4. Location and size of all areas to be conveyed or reserved as common open spaces or for public or semipublic uses; 5. Existing and proposed circulation system of arterial, collector, and local streets; off-street parking, loading, and emergency access areas; points of access to public rights-of-way; proposed ownership of circulation routes; City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 112 6. Existing and proposed sidewalks and paths; 7. Existing and proposed utility systems, including sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water, electricity, gas and telephone; 8. A general landscape plan. 9. A general grading plan; G. Information on land area adjacent to the proposed development, indicating important relationships between the proposal and surrounding land uses, circulation systems, public facilities and natural features; H. Any additional information which may be required by the director to evaluate the character and impact of the planned development. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.4(A)) 17.62.020 Actions of the Planning Commission. After giving notice as provided in Section 17.70.030, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the application. The Planning Commission may approve, approve subject to certain modifications, or deny the application. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be in the form of a recommendation to the Council and shall be rendered in writing, stating all modifications or conditions to be reflected in the final development plan. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code 9204.4(B)) 17.62.030 Actions of the Council. After giving notice as provided in Section 17.70.030, the Council shall hold a public hearing on the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission. The Council may approve, approve subject to certain modifications, or deny the proposal. The decision of the Council shall be rendered in writing, stating all modifications or conditions to be reflected in the final development plan. If it approves or conditionally approves the preliminary development plan, the Council shall approve the rezoning and the official zone map shall be amended to indicate approval of the planned development. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code 9204.4(C)) 17.62.045 - Decision and Findings Following a public hearing, the Commission may recommend, and the Council may approve or disapprove a rezoning to apply the PD overlay zoning district in compliance with this Section. A. Mandatory project features. The review authority may recommend or approve a rezoning to apply the PD overlay zoning district only for a project that incorporates a minimum of two of the following four features. 1. A minimum of 25 percent of the residential units within the project are affordable to households of very low, low or moderate income (See Municipal Code Chapter 17.90 for incentives provided for affordable housing development, including density bonuses and possible fee waivers); 2. The project will achieve a minimum of 30 percent greater energy efficiency than the minimum required by California Code of Regulations Title 24; 3. The project will preserve, enhance, and/or create a significant natural feature with a minimum area of one-half acre; or City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 113 4. The project will provide a substantial public amenity, for example, a significant public plaza, a public park, or a similar improved open space feature, including provisions for guaranteed long-term maintenance not at the expense of the City. B. Required findings for approval. The review authority may approve a rezoning to apply the PD overlay zoning district only after first making all of the following findings: 1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, and the proposed land use is allowed within the applicable primary zoning district; 2. The project complies with all applicable provisions of these Zoning Regulations other than those modified by the PD rezoning; 3. The approved modifications to the development standards of these Zoning Regulations are necessary and appropriate to accommodate the superior design of the proposed project, its compatibility with adjacent land uses, and its successful mitigation of environmental impacts; 4. The project complies with all applicable City Design Guidelines; 5. All affected public facilities, services, and utilities are adequate to serve the proposed project; 6. The location, size, site planning, building design features, and operating characteristics of the project are highly suited to the characteristics of the site and surrounding neighborhood, and will be compatible with the character of the site, and the land uses and development intended for the surrounding neighborhood by the General Plan; 7. The site is adequate for the project in terms of size, configuration topography, and other applicable features, and has appropriate access to public streets with adequate capacity to accommodate the quantity and type of traffic expected to be generated by the use; and 8. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the proposed project will not, in the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use, or detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City. 17.62.050 Requirement for development plan. No land division may be undertaken and no construction begun within an area zoned PD until a final development plan has been approved. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code 9204.4(E)) 17.62.060 Final development plan. A. Within six months of approval of conditional approval of the development plan, the applicant shall file with the Community Development Department a final development plan. At his discretion and for good cause, the Director may extend for six months the period for filing. B. The final development plan shall include those items from Section 17.62.010 (Preliminary development plan) which describe the proposal, including division of land, type and location of all buildings and improvements, and so on, but it need not include information on existing conditions. C. The Director shall review and take action on the final development plan within 30 days of filing. He shall approve it upon finding that it is in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan as approved or modified by the Council. Upon approval of the final development plan, the Director shall add the number of the planned development to the City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 114 official zone map (for example, PD (9999)). Subsequently, all grading, construction and landscaping shall comply with the approved final development plan. D. The final development plan may consist of final subdivision maps, building construction plans, grading plans, and so on, that would normally be submitted in the course of development, and need not be a separate submittal. The Director shall determine the extent to which any additional documentation of development plans is required. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.4(F)) 17.62.070 Phasing. If the construction of the planned development is to occur in phases, the open space and common facilities shall be developed and made available in proportion to the number of dwelling units or nonresidential floor area occupied during any given stage. At no time during construction of the project shall the density of developed land exceed the overall density established in the final development plan. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.4(G)) 17.62.080 Amendment of final development plan. A. Minor differences between the approved development plan and construction plans may be allowed by the Director. B. Written requests for amendments to a final development plan may be approved by the Planning Commission after a public hearing, notice of which has been given as provided in Section 17.70.030. Amendments shall be limited to changes in the size and position of buildings; the number, area or configuration of lots; landscape treatment; phasing, and the like. C. Amendments may not include changes in proposed use, overall density, or overall configuration of the land uses and circulation features. Changes to these aspects may be accomplished only by reapplication and submittal of a new preliminary development plan. D. Amendments to large office PD ordinances approved by the Council prior to June 2003 may be approved under Subsection B. above to allow changes in proposed use as long as those uses are determined by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the General Plan. E. These procedures apply whether or not all or part of the development has been built. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code 9204.4.(H)) 17.62.090 Revocation of PD zoning. If a final development plan is not carried out in the time specified in the development plan or within an approved extension period, the Planning Commission and Council may remove the PD designation according to the usual procedure for city-initiated rezoning. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code 9204.4(I)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 115 Chapter 17.64: REPEAT APPLICATIONS Sections: 17.64.010 Waiting period of one year required when- Exceptions. 17.64.010 Waiting period of one year required when- Exceptions. A. When any application made pursuant to these regulations has been denied, no new application which is substantially the same shall be filed within one year of the date of the previous denial unless the Planning Commission, for good cause, shall grant permission to do so, or the Council or Planning Commission shall initiate such application. B. The Director shall determine when an application is substantially the same as a previous application, subject to the appeal procedures of Chapter 17.66. (Ord. 941 -1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.9) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 116 Chapter 17.66: APPEALS Sections: 17.66.010 Standing to appeal. 17.66.020 Time limits. 17.66.030 Course of appeals. 17.66.040 Content of appeals. 17.66.050 Hearings and notice. 17.66.010 Standing to appeal. Any person may appeal a decision of any official body, except that administrative decisions requiring no discretionary judgment, as provided in Chapter 1.20, may not be appealed. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.8(A)) 17.66.020 Time limits. Appeals must be filed within 10 calendar days of the rendering of a decision which is being appealed. If the tenth day is a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, the appeal period shall extend to the next business day. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.8(B)) 17.66.030 Course of appeals. A. Decisions of the Director shall be appealed to the Planning Commission. Such appeals shall be filed with the Director. B. Decisions of the Planning Commission shall be appealed to the Council. Such appeals shall be filed with the City Clerk. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.8(C)) 17.66.040 Content of appeals. The appeal shall concern a specific action and shall state the grounds for appeal. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.8(D)) 17.66.050 Hearings and notice. A. Action on appeals shall be considered at the same type of hearing and after the same notice that is required for the original decision. B. Once an appeal has been filed, it shall be scheduled for the earliest available meeting, considering public notice requirements, unless the appellant agrees to a later date. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.8(E)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 117 Chapter 17.68: FEES Sections: 17.68.010 Establishment authority. 17.68.010 Establishment authority. The Council may, by resolution, establish fees for applications and procedures required by these regulations, to the extent such fees have a reasonable relationship to the costs incurred in processing the applications and providing public notice. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.10) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 118 Chapter 17.70: AMENDMENTS Sections: 17.70.010 Scope. 17.70.020 Initiation. 17.70.030 Planning Commission action. 17.70.040 Council action. 17.70.050 Annexation and prezoning. 17.70.060 Other requirements. 17.70.010 Scope. An amendment to these regulations which changes any property from one zone to another shall be adopted as set forth in Sections 17.70.020 through 17.70.060. Any other amendment to these regulations may be adopted as other ordinances and amendments to the Municipal Code are adopted. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.7(A)) 17.70.020 Initiation. An amendment to these regulations may be initiated by: A. A resolution of intention of the Planning Commission; B. A resolution of intention of the Council; or C. An application by any other person or agency in the form prescribed by the Director. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.7(B)) 17.70.030 Planning Commission action. A. Before taking any action on a proposed zone change, the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing. Notice of the time, date, place and purpose of the hearing shall be given in each of the following ways at least 10 calendar days before the hearing: 1. Publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the city; 2. Posting each street frontage of the property to be rezoned, or the nearest street access if the property does not abut a dedicated street; 3. First-class mail to owners of the property to be rezoned and of property within a radius of 300 feet, as listed in the most recent annual revision of the County Assessor's roll. B. Failure to post or notify by mail shall not invalidate any amendments duly adopted. C. If the Planning Commission approves a rezoning or denies a Council-initiated rezoning, its action shall be a written recommendation to the Council, including any findings required for approval. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 119 D. If the Planning Commission denies a rezoning which it or a private party has initiated, the action shall be final unless appealed. It shall be rendered in writing and shall state the reasons for denial. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.7(C)) 17.70.040 Council action. Before taking action on a recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Council shall hold a public hearing for which notice shall be given as provided in Section 17.70.030. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.7(D)) 17.70.050 Annexation and prezoning. Any area annexed to the city shall be prezoned consist with the general plan or classified C/OS until rezoned after annexation. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982; prior code - 9204.7(E)) 17.70.060 Other requirements. Procedures for prezoning and adoption of urgency interim regulations shall be as provided in the California Government Code. Requirements for the scheduling of zoning hearings in relation to general plan amendments, reports from the Planning Commission to the Council upon referral, and all other matters not prescribed in greater detail in these regulations shall be as provided in the Government Code. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.7(F)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 120 Chapter 17.72: ENFORCEMENT Sections: 17.72.010 Delegation of authority. 17.72.020 Violations. 17.72.010 Delegation of authority. The Director shall be responsible for enforcing these regulations and shall issue no permit in conflict with them. Any such permit issued shall be void. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.6(A)) 17.72.020 Violations. A. General Regulations and Requirements. The Director shall enforce these regulations in accordance with provisions of this code and any other procedures as may be adopted by resolution of the Council. B. Revocation of Use Permits, Variances and Home Occupation Permits. 1. A use permit or variance shall be automatically revoked if not used within one year, unless a longer period is specified in the approval, or unless an extension is granted. 2. All types of permits and variances may be revoked by the body that originally approved them, upon determining that any of the conditions have been violated. Procedures for revocation shall be as prescribed for issuance of the permit, including written notice to the permittee at least 10 calendar days before the hearing. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.6(B)) City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 121 Chapter 17.93: HIGH OCCUPANCY RESIDENTIAL USE REGULATIONS Sections: 17.93.010 Purpose 17.93.020 Definition 17.93.030 General Requirements 17.93.040 Performance Standards 17.93.050 Administration 17.93.060 Periodic Review, Enforcement and Violations 17.93.010 Purpose A. This chapter is intended to promote the quality of life in low-density and medium-density residential neighborhoods by ensuring that dwellings provide adequate support facilities. 17.93.020 Definitions A. High Occupancy Residential Use is any dwelling, other than a residential care facility as defined in section 17.04.340 of this code, in the R-1 or R-2 zones when the occupancy of the dwelling consists of six or more adults. B. Adult means a person 18 years of age and older. C. Tandem parking means the arrangement of parking where no more than two cars are arranged in tandem, one in front of the other. 17.93.030 General requirements A. Applicability. A high occupancy residential use is allowed in the R-1 and R-2 zones subject to the performance standards set forth in section 17.93.040, below. B. Relation to zone standards. Where this chapter does not contain a particular type of standard or procedure, conventional zoning standards shall apply. C. Nothing in this section prohibits applicants from requesting exceptions or variances from the strict interpretation of Zoning Regulations to the extent allowed by said regulations for any use. 17.93.040 Performance standards A. Upon approval of an administrative use permit, as defined by Chapter 17.58, a high occupancy residential use may be established with occupancy of six or more adults. The purpose of the use permit is to ensure compliance with the performance standards described below, and to ensure the compatibility of the use at particular locations. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 122 1. The dwelling must contain a minimum 300 square feet of gross floor area, less garage area, per adult. 2. The parking requirement shall be the greater of: 1) The number of spaces required for dwellings as described in Section 17.16.060. OR one off-street parking space per adult occupant, less one. 3. The parking of one vehicle within a required street yard or setback is allowed. Parking in other yards is prohibited. 4. Each required parking space shall be of an all-weather surface. 5. Upon approval of the Community Development Director, parking may be provided in tandem. 6. There shall be a minimum of one bathroom provided for every three adult occupants. 7. The dwelling must meet all current building, health, safety and fire codes and have been built with all required permits. 17.93.050 Administration. A. Permit requirement. For high occupancy residential uses with six or more adult occupants, the applicant shall apply for and obtain an administrative use permit as defined by Zoning Regulations. The applicant shall submit and certify the following information as part of the application for an administrative use permit: 1. Address of dwelling. 2. A site plan that shows: a. the entire boundary of the site as well as adjacent structures within 20 feet. b. the number and location of off-street parking spaces. c. the gross floor area of the dwelling in square feet. d. the floor plan for the dwelling with the rooms clearly labeled. 3. The number of proposed adult occupants. 4. Owners signature. 5. Any other information deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. 17.93.060 Periodic review and enforcement. A. Periodic Review. High occupancy residential uses shall be reviewed annually to insure compliance with the provisions of this section. The use permit shall be reviewed annually for compliance with this chapter. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to initiate the review and pay applicable fees. B. Violations. Violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall be the basis for enforcement action by the City that may include revocation of a previously approved use permit. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 123 Chapter 17.100: Definitions A. Definitions, "A." Accessory. “Accessory” means clearly subordinate or incidental and directly related to a permitted use or structure. "Accessory use" includes active or passive solar heating systems and cogeneration facilities. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Airport. An area approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the take-off and landing of aircraft, including appurtenant areas for airport buildings, aircraft operations, and related facilities, aprons and taxiways, control towers, hangers, safety lights, navigation and air traffic control facilities and structures. These may also include facilities for aircraft manufacturing, maintenance, repair, and reconditioning. Where approved, an airport may also include aircraft sales and dealerships, car rental establishments, gift shops, hotels and motels, personal services, restaurants and bars, tobacco and news stands, and other similar commercial uses serving the air-traveling public and airport employees. Ambulance, Taxi, or Limousine Dispatch Facility. A base facility from which taxis and limousines are dispatched, and/or where ambulance vehicles and crews stand by for emergency calls. Does not include a dispatch office facility on a site separate from the location where the vehicles used by the business are parked or stored between calls, which is instead included under the definition of "Office - Production or Administration." Antenna/Telecommunications Facility. Public, commercial and private electromagnetic and photoelectrical transmission, broadcast, repeater and receiving stations for radio, television, telegraph, telephone, data network, and wireless communications, including commercial earth stations for satellite-based communications. Includes antennas, commercial satellite dish antennas, and equipment buildings. Does not include telephone, telegraph and cable television transmission facilities utilizing hard-wired or direct cable connections. Auto and Vehicle Sales/Rental. A retail establishment selling and/or renting automobiles, trucks and vans, motorcycles, and bicycles (bicycle sales are also included under "General Retail"). May also include repair shops and the sales of parts and accessories, incidental to vehicle dealerships. Does not include: the sale of auto parts/accessories separate from a vehicle dealership (see "Auto Parts Sales"); mobile home, recreational vehicle, or watercraft sales (see "Mobile Home, RV and Boat Sales"); tire recapping establishments (see "Vehicle Services"); businesses dealing exclusively in used parts, (see "Recycling - Scrap and Dismantling Yards"); or "Service Stations," which are separately defined. Auto Parts Sales. A store that sells new automobile parts, tires, and accessories. May also include minor parts installation (see also "Vehicle Services"). Does not include tire recapping establishments, which are found under "Vehicle Services" or businesses dealing exclusively in used parts, which are included under "Recycling - Scrap and Dismantling Yards." Automated Teller Machine (ATM). A computerized, self-service machine used by banking customers for financial transactions, including deposits, withdrawals and fund transfers, without face-to-face contact with financial institution personnel. These machines may be located at or within banks, or in other locations. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 124 B. Definitions, "B." Banks and Financial Services. Financial institutions including: banks and trust companies credit unions holding (but not primarily operating) companies home loan services lending and thrift institutions mortgage brokers other investment companies securities/commodity contract brokers and dealers security and commodity exchanges vehicle finance (equity) leasing See also, "Automated Teller Machine," above. Bar/Tavern. A business where alcoholic beverages are sold for on-site consumption, which are not part of a larger restaurant. Includes bars, taverns, pubs, and similar establishments where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages. May also include beer brewing as part of a microbrewery, and other beverage tasting facilities. Does not include adult entertainment businesses. Bed and Breakfast Inn (B&B). A building or group of buildings providing 15 or fewer bedrooms or suites that are rented for overnight lodging, with a common eating area for guests. Does not include room rental, which is separately defined (see ABoarding/Rooming House@). Block Front. Block front means all the properties fronting on one side of a street, between intersecting streets or a street and a railroad, waterway, cul-de-sac, or unsubdivided land. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Boarding/Rooming House. A dwelling or part of a dwelling where lodging is furnished for compensation to more than three persons living independently from each other. Meals may also be included. Does not include fraternities, sororities, convents, or monasteries, which are separately defined. Building. "Building" means any structure used or intended for sheltering or supporting any use or occupancy. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Building and Landscape Materials Sales. Retail establishments selling hardware, lumber and other large building materials, where most display and sales occur indoors. Includes paint, wallpaper, glass, fixtures. Includes all these stores selling to the general public, even if contractor sales account for a major proportion of total sales. Establishments primarily selling electrical, plumbing, heating, and air conditioning equipment and supplies are classified in "Wholesaling and Distribution." City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 125 Business Support Service. An establishment within a building that provides services to other businesses. Examples of these services include: blueprinting computer-related services (rental, repair) copying and quick printing services film processing and photofinishing (retail) mailing and mail box services outdoor advertising services protective services (other than office related) security systems services C. Definitions, "C." Caretaker Dwelling. A permanent residence that is secondary or accessory to the primary use of the property, and used for housing a caretaker employed on the site of any non-residential use where needed for security purposes or to provide 24-hour care or monitoring of people, plants, animals, equipment, or other conditions on the site. Cemetery, Mausoleum, Columbarium. Interment establishments engaged in subdividing property into cemetery lots and offering burial plots or air space for sale. Includes mausoleum, crematorium, and columbarium operations; and full-service mortuaries and funeral parlors accessory to a cemetery or columbarium. Club, Lodge, Private Meeting Hall. Permanent, headquarters-type and meeting facilities for organizations operating on a membership basis for the promotion of the interests of the members, including facilities for: business associations civic, social and fraternal orgs. labor unions and similar orgs. political organizations professional membership orgs. other membership organizations Commercial Recreation Facility - Indoor. Establishments providing indoor amusement and entertainment services for a fee or admission charge, including: bowling alleys coin-operated amusement arcades electronic game arcades ice skating and roller skating pool and billiard rooms as primary uses This use does not include adult entertainment businesses, or night clubs, which are separately defined. Four or more electronic games or coin-operated amusements in any establishment, or a premises where 50 percent or more of the floor area is occupied by City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 126 amusement devices, are considered an electronic game arcade as described above, three or less machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site. Commercial Recreation Facility - Outdoor. Facilities for various outdoor recreational activities, where a fee is charged for use. Examples include: amusement and theme parks fairgrounds go-cart tracks golf driving ranges miniature golf courses roller skating, hockey, skateboarding water slides May also include commercial facilities customarily associated with the above outdoor commercial recreational uses, including bars and restaurants, video game arcades, etc. Construction/Heavy Equipment Sales and Rental. Retail establishments selling or renting construction, farm, or other heavy equipment. Examples include cranes, earth moving equipment, tractors, combines, and other motorized farming equipment, heavy trucks, etc. Convalescent hospital. "Convalescent hospital" means any place, structure, or institution providing for skilled nursing and allied professional health care, or for chronic or convalescent care for one or more persons, exclusive of relatives, in which nursing, dietary or other personal services are rendered to convalescents, invalids, or aged persons, who, by reason of advanced age, chronic illness, or physical infirmity are unable to properly care for themselves, but not including persons suffering from contagious or mental diseases, alcoholism, or drug addiction, and in which surgery is not performed and primary treatment, such as customarily is given in hospitals or sanitariums, is not provided. Convalescent hospital includes “nursing home” but does not include “rest home,” “hospital,” or “residential care facility.” (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part) Ord. 1346 (1999 Series)) Convenience Store. A retail establishment with not more than 4,500 square feet of gross floor area, offering for sale prepackaged food products, household items, newspapers and magazines, and sandwiches and other freshly prepared foods, such as salads, for off-site consumption. Convent or Monastery. A housing facility where residents are limited to members of a specific religious order. Creek. "Creek" is a waterway or portion of waterway designated as a creek on the Open Space Element Creek Map. A drainage ditch, concrete swale, underground culvert, or storm drain (as indicated on the Creek Map) is not a creek. Creeks located outside the urban reserve line are as designated by the USGS 7.5 Minute series quadrangle maps or San Luis Obispo County data. (Ord. 1225 (1992)) D. Definitions, "D." Day Care. Facilities that provide non-medical care and supervision of adults or minor children for periods of less than 24 hours. These facilities include the following, all of which are required to be licensed by the California State Department of Social Services. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 127 1. Child Day Care Center. Commercial or non-profit child day care facilities designed and approved to accommodate 15 or more children. Includes infant centers, preschools, sick-child centers, and school-age day care facilities. These may be operated in conjunction with a school or church facility, or as an independent land use. 2. Large Family Day Care Home. As provided by Health and Safety Code Section 1596.78, a home that regularly provides care, protection, and supervision for seven to 14 children, inclusive, including children under the age of 10 years who reside in the home, for periods of less than 24 hours per day, while the parents or guardians are away. 3. Small Family Day Care Home. As provided by Health and Safety Code Section 1596.78, a home that provides family day care for eight or fewer children, including children under the age of 10 years who reside in the home. 4. Adult day care facility. A day care facility providing care and supervision for adult clients. Den (or family room, sewing room, loft or studio). "Den" (or "family room," "sewing room," "loft" or "studio") means a room which is open on at least one side, does not contain a wardrobe, closet or similar facility, and which is not designed for sleeping. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Director. "Director" means the Director of the Community Development Department, or someone designated by him to act on his behalf. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Dormitory. A building used as group quarters for students, as an accessory use for a college, university, boarding school, or other similar institutional use. Drive-through facility. "Drive-through facility" means one in which vehicles line up for service at definite spots and where customers are served without leaving their vehicles. (Ord. 941-1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Dwelling. "Dwelling" means a building or mobile home on a permanent foundation with provisions for sleeping, cooking and sanitation, and with permanent connections to utilities, providing independent living space. Ord. 1006 - 1 (part), 1984: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) E. Definitions, "E." Educational facilities. A. "Adult school," "business school" or "trade school" means a professional, recreational or vocational school providing a continuous program of instruction primarily for adults, as a business. B. "College" means a facility providing a continuous academic program primarily for students 17 years of age or older. C. "Elementary school" means a facility providing a continuous program of instruction for students generally aged five through 12. D. "High school" means a facility providing a continuous program of instruction for students generally aged 16 through 18. E. "Junior high school" means a facility providing a continuous program of instruction for students generally aged 13 through 15. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 128 F. "Nursery school and preschool" see Day Care. (Ord. 1225, 1992 (part)) Electronic game /Electronic game amusement center. "Electronic game" means a coin-operated machine or device offered to the public as a game or amusement, the object of which is to achieve a high or low score based on the skill of the player. "Electronic game amusement center" means any premises having thereon available four or more electronic games. See also Chapter 5.52, electronic game amusement centers. (Ord. 946 - 3. 1983: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Existing topography. “Existing topography” means the natural unaltered topography or the topography resulting from grading activity legally permitted in conjunction with subdivision improvements, right-of-way improvements, or previous on-site building improvements. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) Extended Hour Retail. A business that is open to the public between the hours of 2 a.m., and 6 a.m. F. Definitions, "F." Festival (or carnival or fair). "Festival" (or "carnival" or "fair") means a temporary public or commercial gathering where entertainment, food, crafts, and the like are offered for viewing or sale. Gatherings on public property under the sponsorship or control of the city are excluded. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Fitness/Health Facility. Fitness centers, gymnasiums, health and athletic clubs including any of the following: indoor sauna, spa or hot tub facilities; indoor tennis, handball, racquetball, archery and shooting ranges and other indoor sports activities. Floor area ratio. The gross floor area of a building or buildings on a lot divided by the lot area. (Ord. 1365 (2000 Series)(part)) Fraternity house (or sorority house). "Fraternity house" (or "sorority house") means residence for college or university students who are members of a social or educational association and where such an association holds meetings or gatherings. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Front Yard. The area of a residential lot that lies between the street property line and the walls of any residences that face the street. (Ord. 1277, 1995) Fuel Dealer. A retail trade establishment that sells fuel oil, butane, propane and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), bottled or in bulk, to consumers, as the primary use of the site. Does not include the sale of these fuels as an accessory use to a service station. Furniture/Fixtures Manufacturing, Cabinet Shop. Manufacturers producing: wood and metal household furniture and appliances; bedsprings and mattresses; all types of office furniture and public building furniture and partitions, shelving, lockers and store furniture; and miscellaneous drapery hardware, window blinds and shades. Includes wood and cabinet shops, but not sawmills or planing mills, which are instead included under "Manufacturing - Heavy." Furniture, Furnishings and Appliance Store. A store that primarily sells the following products and related services, that may also provide incidental repair services: City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 129 computers and computer equipment draperies floor coverings furniture glass and chinaware home appliances home furnishings home sound systems interior decorating materials and services large musical instruments lawn furniture movable spas and hot tubs office furniture other household electrical and gas appliances outdoor furniture refrigerators stoves televisions G. Definitions, "G." General Retail. Stores and shops selling many lines of merchandise. Examples of these stores and lines of merchandise include: art galleries, retail artists' supplies auction rooms bicycles (also included under Auto & Vehicle Sales) books cameras and photographic supplies clothing and accessories collectibles (cards, coins, comics, stamps, etc.) department stores drug and discount stores dry goods fabrics and sewing supplies florists and houseplant stores (indoor sales only, outdoor sales are "Building and Landscape Materials Sales") hobby materials jewelry luggage and leather goods musical instruments, parts and accessories orthopedic supplies religious goods small wares specialty shops sporting goods and equipment stationery toys and games variety store Golf Course. Golf courses, and accessory facilities and uses including: clubhouses with bar and restaurant, locker and shower facilities; driving ranges; "pro shops" for on-site sales of golfing equipment; and golf cart storage and sales facilities. Grazing. "Grazing" means the keeping of hoofed animals where food grown on the premises is the principal food of the livestock. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Gross floor area. "Gross floor area" means the total area enclosed within a building, including closets, stairways, and utility and mechanical rooms, measured from the exterior face of the walls. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 130 Guest house. A separate accessory structure, that is designed, occupied, or intended for occupancy as sleeping and bathing quarters only, that does not contain a refrigerator, cooking appliances, or a kitchen sink, and is intended to be used in conjunction with a primary residence that contains a kitchen. H. Definitions, "H." Heliport. A designated, marked area on the ground or the top of a structure where helicopters may land at any time. High Occupancy Residential Use. A "High Occupancy Residential Use" is any dwelling other than a residential care facility as defined in section 17.04.340 of this code, in the R-1 or R-2 zones when the occupancy of the dwelling consists of six or more adults. (Ord. 1154 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1989) Home Occupation. The conduct of a business within a dwelling unit or residential site, employing only the occupants of the dwelling, with the business activity being subordinate to the residential use of the property. Homeless Shelter. A church, public building, or quasi-public facility that provides emergency or temporary shelter to homeless individuals and/or groups. These accommodations may include temporary lodging, meals, laundry facilities, bathing, counseling, and other basic support services. Hospital. "Hospital" means a facility housing and providing a full range of medical care, including acute care, for patients who require such care on the premises. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Hostel. Inexpensive lodging that caters primarily, but not exclusively, to travelers who arrive by bicycle, train, or other non-automotive vehicles. Hotel, Motel. A facility with guest rooms or suites, with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging; for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, personal services, etc. Also includes accessory guest facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities, accessory retail uses, etc. I. Definitions, "I." Impervious surface. A surface that is incapable of being penetrated by water. Industrial Research and Development (R&D). A facility for scientific research, and the design, development and testing of electrical, electronic, magnetic, optical and computer and telecommunications components in advance of product manufacturing, and the assembly of related products from parts produced off-site, where the manufacturing activity is secondary to the research and development activities. Includes pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology research and development. Does not include soils and other materials testing laboratories (see "Laboratories"), or medical laboratories (see "Medical Service - Clinic, Laboratory, Urgent Care"). L. Definitions, "L." City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 131 Laboratory - Medical, Analytical, Research, Testing. A facility for testing, analysis, and/or research. Examples of this use include medical labs, soils and materials testing labs, and forensic labs. This type of facility is distinguished from Industrial Research and Development in its orientation more toward testing and analysis than product development or prototyping; an Industrial Research and Development facility may typically include this type of lab. The "medical lab" subset of this land use type is oriented more toward specimen analysis and processing than direct blood drawing and specimen collection from patients (see "Medical Service - Clinic, Laboratory, Urgent Care"), but may also include incidental specimen collection. Laundries and Dry Cleaning Plants. Service establishments engaged primarily in high volume laundry and garment services, including: carpet and upholstery cleaners; diaper services; dry cleaning and garment pressing; commercial laundries; linen supply. These facilities may include accessory customer pick-up facilities. These facilities do not include coin-operated laundries or dry cleaning pick-up stores without dry cleaning equipment; see "Personal Services." Libraries and Museums. Public or quasi-public facilities, examples of which include: aquariums, arboretums, art galleries and exhibitions, botanical gardens, historic sites and exhibits, libraries, museums, planetariums, and zoos. May also include accessory retail uses such as a gift/book shop, restaurant, etc. Live/Work Unit, Work/Live Unit. An integrated housing unit and working space, occupied and utilized by a single household in a structure, either single-family or multi-family, that has been designed or structurally modified to accommodate joint residential occupancy and work activity, and which includes: 1. Complete kitchen space and sanitary facilities in compliance with the City building code; and 2. Working space reserved for and regularly used by one or more occupants of the unit. The difference between live/work and work/live units is that the "work" component of a live/work unit is secondary to its residential use, and may include only commercial activities and pursuits that are compatible with the character of a quiet residential environment, while the work component of a work/live unit is the primary use, to which the residential component is secondary. Lot. "Lot" means: A. A parcel of real property with a distinct designation delineated on an approved survey map, tract map, or parcel map filed in the Office of the County Recorder and abutting at least one public street; or B. A parcel of real property containing at least the area required for the zone district in which it is located, abutting at least one public street or other access approved by the council, and held under separate ownership from adjoining property. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) M. Definitions, "M." Maintenance Service, Client Site Services. Base facilities for various businesses that provide services on the premises of their clients. Includes gardening, janitorial, pest control, water and smoke damage recovery, and similar services; and appliance, computer, electronics, elevator, equipment, HVAC, instrument, plumbing, and other maintenance and repair services not operating from a retail establishment that sells the products being maintained or repaired. When these services operate from a retail establishment that sells City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 132 the products being maintained or repaired, they are instead considered part of the retail use. Does not include office-only facilities with no storage of the equipment and/or vehicles used by the service, which are included under "Office - Production and Administrative." Manufacturing - Heavy. A facility accommodating manufacturing processes that involve and/or produce basic metals, building materials, chemicals, fabricated metals, paper products, machinery, textiles, and/or transportation equipment, where the intensity and/or scale of operations may cause impacts on surrounding land uses or the community. Examples of heavy manufacturing uses include the following. 1. Chemical Product Manufacturing. An establishment that produces or uses basic chemicals, and other establishments creating products predominantly by chemical processes. Examples of these products include: basic chemicals, including acids, alkalies, salts, and organic chemicals; chemical products to be used in further manufacture, including synthetic fibers, plastic materials, dry colors, and pigments; and finished chemical products to be used for ultimate consumption, including drugs/pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and soaps; or to be used as materials or supplies in other industries including paints, fertilizers, and explosives. Also includes sales and transportation establishments handling the chemicals described above, except as part of retail trade. 2. Concrete, Gypsum, and Plaster Product Manufacturing. An establishment that produces bulk concrete, concrete building block, brick, and/or other types of precast and prefabricated concrete products. Also includes ready-mix concrete batch plants, lime manufacturing, and the manufacture of gypsum products, including plasterboard. A retail ready-mix concrete operation as an incidental use in conjunction with a building materials outlet is defined under "Building and Landscape Materials Sales." 3. Glass Product Manufacturing. An establishment that manufactures glass and/or glass products by melting silica sand or cullet, including the production of flat glass and other glass products that are pressed, blown, or shaped from glass produced in the same establishment. Artisan and craftsman type operations of a larger scale than home occupations are instead included under (Manufacturing - Light - Handcraft Industries and Small-Scale Manufacturing). 4. Lumber and Wood Product Manufacturing. Manufacturing, processing, and sales involving the milling of forest products to produce rough and finished lumber and other wood materials for use in other manufacturing, craft, or construction processes. Includes the following processes and products: containers, pallets and skids matches (wood) milling operations trusses and structural beams turning and shaping of wood products wholesaling of basic wood products wood product assembly Does not include craft-type shops ("Handcraft Industries and Small-Scale Manufacturing"); other wood and cabinet shops ("Furniture and Fixture Manufacturing, Cabinet Shops"); or the entirely indoor retail sale of building materials, construction tools and equipment ("Building and Landscape Materials Sales"). City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 133 5. Machinery Manufacturing. An establishment that makes or processes raw materials into finished machines or parts for machines. Does not include the manufacture of electronics, equipment, or appliances ("Electronics, Equipment, and Appliance Manufacturing"). 6. Metal Products Fabrication, Machine and Welding Shops. An establishment engaged in the production and/or assembly of metal parts, including the production of metal cabinets and enclosures, cans and shipping containers, doors and gates, duct work, forgings and stampings, hardware and tools, plumbing fixtures and products, tanks, towers, and similar products. Examples of these uses include: blacksmith and welding shops plating, stripping, and coating shops sheet metal shops machine shops and boiler shops 7. Motor Vehicles and Transportation Equipment. Manufacturers of equipment for transporting passengers and cargo by land, air and water, including motor vehicles, aircraft, spacecraft, ships, boats, railroad and other vehicles such as motorcycles, bicycles and snowmobiles. Includes manufacture of motor vehicle parts and accessories; trailers and campers for attachment to other vehicles; self-contained motor homes; and van conversions. Does not include mobile home and modular home assembly (listed under "Lumber and Wood Products"). 8. Paving and Roofing Materials Manufacturing. The manufacture of various common paving and petroleum-based roofing materials, including bulk asphalt, paving blocks made of asphalt, creosote wood, and various compositions of asphalt and tar. Does not include the manufacture of wood roofing materials (shingles, shakes, etc.) ("Lumber and Wood Product Manufacturing"). 9. Petroleum Refining and Related Industries. Industrial plants for purifying petroleum, and the compounding of lubricating oils and greases from purchased materials. Also includes oil or gas processing facilities, liquified natural gas (LNG) facilities, the manufacture of petroleum coke and fuel briquettes, tank farms, and terminal facilities for pipelines. Does not include petroleum pipeline surge tanks and pump stations ("Public Utility Facilities"), or petroleum product distributors ("Petroleum Product Storage and Distribution"). 10. Plastics, other Synthetics, and Rubber Product Manufacturing. The manufacture of rubber products including: tires, rubber footwear, mechanical rubber goods, heels and soles, flooring, and other rubber products from natural, synthetic, or reclaimed rubber. Also includes establishments engaged primarily in manufacturing tires; products from recycled or reclaimed plastics or styrofoam; molding primary plastics for other manufacturers, manufacturing miscellaneous finished plastics products, fiberglass manufacturing, and fiberglass application services. Does not include establishments engaged primarily in recapping and retreading automobile tires ("Vehicle Services - Major Repair/Body Work"). 11. Primary Metal Industries. An establishment engaged in: the smelting and refining of ferrous and nonferrous metals from ore, pig, or scrap; the rolling, drawing, and alloying of metals; the manufacture of castings, forgings, stampings, extrusions, and other basic metal products; and the manufacturing of nails, spikes, and insulated wire and cable. Also includes merchant blast furnaces and by-product or beehive coke ovens. 12. Pulp and Pulp Product Manufacturing. An establishment that manufactures pulp, paper, or paperboard. Includes pulp, paper, and paperboard mills. Does not include establishments City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 134 primarily engaged in converting paper or paperboard without manufacturing the paper or paperboard, including envelope manufacturing, converted paper products, paper coating and glazing, paper bags, assembly of paperboard boxes, wallpaper (Manufacturing, Light Manufacturing, Paper Product Manufacturing). 13. Stone and Cut Stone Product Manufacturing. An establishment that cuts, shapes, and/or finishes marble, granite, slate, and/or other stone for construction and miscellaneous uses. Does not include establishments engaged primarily in buying or selling partly finished monuments and tombstones (AHandcraft industries, Small-scale Manufacturing@). 14. Structural Clay and Pottery Product Manufacturing. An establishment that produces brick and structural clay products, including pipe, china plumbing fixtures, vitreous china articles, and/or fine earthenware and porcelain products. Does not include artist/craftsman uses (see "Handcraft Industries and Small Scale Manufacturing," "Home Occupations"). 15. Textile and Leather Product Manufacturing. An establishment that converts basic fibers (natural or synthetic) into a product, including yarn or fabric, that can be further manufactured into usable items (AFabric Product Manufacturing@), and industries that transform hides into leather by tanning or curing. Includes: coating, waterproofing, or otherwise treating fabric dressed and dyed furs dying and finishing fiber, yarn, fabric, and knit apparel leather-tanned, curried, and finished manufacture of knit apparel and other finished products from yarn manufacture of felt goods, lace goods, non-woven fabrics and miscellaneous textiles manufacturing of woven fabric, carpets, and rugs from yarn preparation of fiber and subsequent manufacturing of yarn, threads, braids, twine scouring and combing plants upholstery manufacturing yarn and thread mills Manufacturing - Light. A facility accommodating manufacturing processes involving and/or producing: apparel; food and beverage products; electronic, optical, and instrumentation products; ice; jewelry; and musical instruments. Light manufacturing also includes other establishments engaged in the assembly, fabrication, and conversion of already processed raw materials into products, where the operational characteristics of the manufacturing processes and the materials used are unlikely to cause significant impacts on surrounding land uses or the community. Examples of light manufacturing uses include the following. 1. Clothing and Fabric Product Manufacturing. An establishment that assembles clothing, draperies, and/or other products by cutting and sewing purchased textile fabrics, and related materials including leather, rubberized fabrics, plastics and furs. Does not include custom tailors and dressmakers not operating as a factory and not located on the site of a clothing store (see "Personal Services"). See also, "Manufacturing - Heavy - Textile and Leather Product Manufacturing." City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 135 2. Electronics, Equipment, and Appliance Manufacturing. An establishment that manufactures equipment, apparatus, and/or supplies for the generation, storage, transmission, transformation and use of electrical energy, including: appliances such as stoves/ovens, refrigerators, freezers, laundry equipment, fans, vacuum cleaners, sewing machines aviation instruments computers, computer components, peripherals electrical transmission and distribution equipment electronic components and accessories, semiconductors, integrated circuits, related devices electrical welding apparatus lighting and wiring equipment such as lamps and fixtures, wiring devices, vehicle lighting industrial apparatus industrial controls instruments for measurement, testing, analysis and control, associated sensors and accessories miscellaneous electrical machinery, equipment and supplies such as batteries, X-ray apparatus and tubes, electromedical and electrotherapeutic apparatus, electrical equipment for internal combustion engines motors and generators optical instruments and lenses photographic equipment and supplies pre-recorded magnetic tape radio and television receiving equipment such as television and radio sets, phonograph records and surgical, medical and dental instruments, equipment, and supplies surveying and drafting instruments telephone and telegraph apparatus transformers, switch gear and switchboards watches and clocks Does not include testing laboratories (soils, materials testing, etc.) (see "Business Support Services"), or research and development facilities separate from manufacturing (see "Research and Development"). 3. Food and Beverage Product Manufacturing. Manufacturing establishments producing or processing foods and beverages for human consumption, and certain related products. Examples of these uses include: bottling plants breweries candy, sugar and confectionery products manufacturing catering services separate from stores or restaurants coffee roasting dairy products manufacturing processing grain mill products and by-products meat, poultry, and seafood canning, curing, byproduct processing soft drink production miscellaneous food item preparation from raw product City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 136 fats and oil product manufacturing fruit and vegetable canning, preserving, related Does not include: bakeries, which are separately defined; or beer brewing as part of a brew pub, bar or restaurant (see "Bar/Tavern," and "Night Club"). 4. Handcraft Industries, Small-Scale Manufacturing. Establishments manufacturing and/or assembling small products primarily by hand, including jewelry, pottery and other ceramics, as well as small glass and metal art and craft products. Also includes manufacturing establishments producing small products not classified in another major manufacturing group, including: brooms and brushes; buttons, costume novelties; jewelry; musical instruments; pens, pencils, and other office and artists' materials; sporting and athletic goods; toys; etc. 5. Paper Product Manufacturing. An establishment that converts pre-manufactured paper or paperboard into boxes, envelopes, paper bags, wallpaper, etc., and/or that coats or glazes pre-manufactured paper. Does not include the manufacturing of pulp, paper, or paperboard (see AManufacturing - Heavy - Pulp and Pulp Product Manufacturing"). Media Production. Fixed-base facilities for motion picture, television, video, sound, computer, and other communications media production. These facilities include the following types. 1. Backlots/outdoor facilities. Outdoor sets, backlots, and other outdoor facilities, including supporting indoor workshops and craft shops. 2. Indoor support facilities. Administrative and technical production support facilities, including administrative and production offices, post-production facilities (editing and sound recording studios, foley stages, etc.), optical and special effects units, film processing laboratories, etc. 3. Soundstages. Warehouse-type facilities providing space for the construction and use of indoor sets, including supporting workshops and craft shops. Does not include location filming. Medical Service - Doctor Office. A facility other than a hospital where medical, dental, mental health, surgical, and/or other personal health care services are provided on an outpatient basis, and that accommodates no more than five licensed primary practitioners (for example, chiropractors, medical doctors, psychiatrists, etc.). Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under "Offices - Professional." Does not include sports therapy that provides on-site fitness equipment, which is instead included under "Fitness/Health Facility." Medical Service - Clinic, Laboratory, Urgent Care. A facility other than a hospital where medical, mental health, surgical and other personal health services are provided on an outpatient basis. Examples of these uses include: medical and dental laboratories medical offices with six or more licensed practitioners and/or medical specialties out-patient care facilities urgent care facilities other allied health services City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 137 Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under "Offices - Professional." Medical Service - Extended Care. Residential facilities providing nursing and health-related care as a primary use with in-patient beds. Examples of these uses include: board and care homes; convalescent and rest homes; extended care facilities; and skilled nursing facilities. Long-term personal care facilities that do not emphasize medical treatment are included under "Residential Care." Medical Service - Hospital. Hospitals and similar facilities engaged primarily in providing diagnostic services, and extensive medical treatment, including surgical and other hospital services. These establishments have an organized medical staff, inpatient beds, and equipment and facilities to provide complete health care. May include on-site accessory clinics and laboratories, accessory retail uses and emergency heliports (see the separate definition of "Accessory Retail and Services"). Mixed Use Project. A project that combines both non-residential and residential uses, where the residential component is typically located above or behind the commercial. Mobile Home, RV, and Boat Sales. Retail establishments selling both mobile home dwelling units, and/or various vehicles and watercraft for recreational uses. Includes the sales of boats, campers and camper shells, jet skis, mobile homes, motor homes, and travel trailers. Mortuaries and Funeral Homes. Funeral homes and parlors, where deceased are prepared for burial or cremation, funeral services may be conducted, and cremation may occur. Multi-Family Dwelling. A dwelling unit that is part of a structure containing one or more other dwelling units, or a non-residential use. An example of the latter is a mixed-use project where, for example, one or more dwelling units are part of a structure that also contains one or more commercial uses (retail, office, etc.). Multi-family dwellings include: duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes (buildings under one ownership with two, three or four dwelling units, respectively, in the same structure); apartments (five or more units under one ownership in a single building); and townhouse development (three or more attached dwellings where no unit is located over another unit). Does not include secondary units, which are defined in Chapter 17.21. N. Definitions, "N." Night Club. A facility providing entertainment, examples of which include live music and/or dancing, comedy, etc., which may also serve alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption. O. Definitions, "O." Office. These Zoning Regulations distinguish between the following types of offices. These do not include medical offices (see "Medical Service - Clinic, Laboratory, Urgent Care," and "Medical Service - Doctor Office.") 1. Accessory. An office facility that is incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use. 2. Business and Service. An establishment providing direct services to consumers. Examples of these uses include: employment agencies City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 138 insurance agent offices (small-scale customer service offices, not administrative, see item 5. below) real estate offices travel agencies utility company payment offices (not administrative, see item 4. below) This use does not include Banks and Financial Services, which are separately defined. 3. Government. Administrative, clerical, or public contact and/or service offices of a city, other local, state, or federal government agency or service facilities. Includes post offices, but not bulk mailing distribution centers, which are under "Truck and Freight Terminals." 4. Processing. An office-type facility characterized by high employee density, with little or no public visitation, and occupied by a business engaged in information processing, or other computer-dependent and/or telecommunications-based activities. Examples of these uses include: airline, lodging chain, and rental car company reservation centers computer software and hardware design and development consumer credit reporting data processing services health management organization (HMO) offices where no medical services are provided insurance claim processing mail order and electronic commerce transaction processing telecommunications facility design and management telemarketing 5. Production and administrative. An office-type facility used for administrative purposes, and/or occupied by a business engaged in the production of intellectual property. Examples of these uses include: advertising agencies commercial art and design services construction contractors (office facilities only) design services including architecture, engineering, landscape architecture, urban planning educational, scientific and research organizations media postproduction services news services photography studios utility company administrative offices writers and artists offices 6. Professional. An office-type facility occupied by a business providing professional services. Examples of these uses include: City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 139 accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services attorneys counseling services court reporting services detective agencies and similar services financial management and investment counseling literary and talent agencies management and public relations services psychologists secretarial, stenographic, word processing, and temporary clerical employee services security and commodity brokers 7. Temporary. A mobile home, recreational vehicle or modular unit used as a temporary office facility. Temporary Offices may include: construction supervision offices on a construction site or off-site construction yard; a temporary on-site real estate office for a development project; or a temporary business office in advance of permanent facility construction. 8. Temporary Real Estate. The temporary use of a dwelling unit within a residential development project as a sales office for the units on the same site, which is converted to residential use at the conclusion of its office use. Office-Supporting Retail. A retail store that carries one or more types of merchandise that will typically be of frequent interest to and/or needed by the various businesses listed under the definition of "Office," and/or the employees of those businesses. Examples of these types of merchandise include: Computer equipment Office supplies, stationery News stands Photographic supplies and cameras Outdoor sales. "Outdoor sales" means the sale of items regularly stored or displayed outside a building, where such items are visible from a public right-or-way or neighboring property. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Overlay zone. "Overlay zone" means a zone applied in combination with other zone districts in order to impose additional restrictions or to allow greater variety than is possible with the underlying zone. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) P. Definitions, "P." Parking Facility. A surface parking lot or parking structure that is a primary use of a site. Park, Playground. Public parks, play lots, and playgrounds, providing non-commercial facilities for active and/or passive recreation for neighborhood or community use. These facilities may also include any listed under the definition of ASports and Active Recreation Facility.@ City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 140 Personal Services. Establishments providing non-medical services to individuals as a primary use. Examples of these uses include: barber and beauty shops clothing rental dry cleaning pick-up stores with limited equipment home electronics and small appliance repair laundromats (self-service laundries) massage (licensed, therapeutic, non-sexual) shoe repair shops tailors tanning salons These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. Personal Services - Restricted. Personal services that may tend to have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon surrounding areas and which may need to be dispersed to minimize their adverse impacts. Examples of these uses include: check cashing fortune tellers, psychics palm and card readers tattoo and body piercing services Photo and Film Processing Lab. A facility that provides high volume and/or custom processing services for photographic negative film, transparencies, and/or prints, where the processed products are delivered to off-site retail outlets for customer pick-up. Does not include: small-scale photo processing machines accessory to other retail businesses, which are allowed as part of those businesses; or small-scale retail photofinishing services that provide over-the-counter processing services to individual customers, which are included in the definition of "Business Support Services." Printing and Publishing. Establishments engaged in printing by letterpress, lithography, gravure, screen, offset, or electrostatic (xerographic) copying; and other establishments serving the printing trade such as bookbinding, typesetting, engraving, photoengraving and electrotyping. This use also includes establishments that publish newspapers, books and periodicals; establishments manufacturing business forms and binding devices. "Quick printing" services are included in the definition of "Business Support Services." Private club (or lodge). "Private club" (or "lodge") means a premises accommodating bona fide members and their guests only, for social, cultural or educational activities, and only incidentally used for gatherings of other than the club's members. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Public Assembly Facility. An indoor facility for public assembly and group entertainment, other than sporting events. Examples of these facilities include: community centers City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 141 exhibition and convention halls public and semi-public auditoriums similar public assembly uses Public Safety Facility. Facilities operated by public agencies including fire stations, other fire prevention and fire fighting facilities, police and sheriff substations and headquarters, including interim incarceration facilities. Public Utility Facility. Fixed-base structures and facilities serving as junction points for transferring electric utility services from one transmission voltage to another or to local distribution and service voltages, and similar facilities for water supply and natural gas distribution. This use type may also include administrative and customer service offices (also included under "Offices"), and includes any of the following that are not exempted from land use permit requirements by Government Code Section 53091: corporation and maintenance yards. electrical substations and switching stations natural gas regulating and distribution facilities public water system wells, treatment plants and storage telephone switching facilities wastewater treatment plants, settling ponds and disposal fields R. Definitions, "R." Recreational vehicle. Any trailer, camper, motor home or other vehicle designed and intended for traveling and recreational purposes. Recycling Facilities. This land use type includes a variety of facilities involved with the collection, sorting and processing of recyclable materials. 1. Collection facility. A center where the public may donate, redeem or sell recyclable materials, which may include the following, where allowed by the applicable zoning district: a. Reverse vending machines; b. Small collection facilities which occupy an area of 350 square feet or less and may include: (1) A mobile unit; (2) Bulk reverse vending machines or a grouping of reverse vending machines occupying more than 50 square feet; and (3) Kiosk-type units which may include permanent structures. c. Large collection facilities which occupy an area of more than 350 square feet and/or include permanent structures. 2. Mobile recycling unit. An automobile, truck, trailer, or van used for the collection of recyclable materials, carrying bins, boxes, or other containers. 3. Processing facility. A structure or enclosed space used for the collection and processing of recyclable materials for shipment, or to an end-user's specifications, by City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 142 such means as baling, briquetting, cleaning, compacting, crushing, flattening, grinding, mechanical sorting, re-manufacturing and shredding. Processing facilities include the following types, both of which are included under the definition of "Scrap and Dismantling Yards," below: a. Light processing facility occupies an area of under 45,000 square feet of collection, processing and storage area, and averages two outbound truck shipments each day. Light processing facilities are limited to baling, briquetting, compacting, crushing, grinding, shredding and sorting of source separated recyclable materials sufficient to qualify as a certified processing facility. A light processing facility shall not shred, compact, or bale ferrous metals other than food and beverage containers; and b. A heavy processing facility is any processing facility other than a light processing facility. 4. Recycling facility. A center for the collection and/or processing of recyclable materials. A "certified" recycling or processing facility is certified by the California Department of Conservation as meeting the requirements of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act of 986. A recycling facility does not include storage containers located on a residentially, commercially or industrially designated site used solely for the recycling of material generated on the site. See "Collection Facility" above. 5. Recycling or recyclable material. Reusable domestic containers and other materials which can be reconstituted, re-manufactured, or reused in an altered form, including glass, metals, paper and plastic. Recyclable material does not include refuse or hazardous materials. 6. Reverse vending machine. An automated mechanical device which accepts at least one or more types of empty beverage containers and issues a cash refund or a redeemable credit slip with a value not less than the container's redemption value, as determined by State law. These vending machines may accept aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles, and other containers. A bulk reverse vending machine is a reverse vending machine that is larger than 50 square feet, is designed to accept more than one container at a time, and issues a cash refund based on total weight instead of by container. 7. Scrap and dismantling yards. Outdoor establishments primarily engaged in assembling, breaking up, sorting, and the temporary storage and distribution of recyclable or reusable scrap and waste materials, including auto wreckers engaged in dismantling automobiles for scrap, and the incidental wholesale or retail sales of parts from those vehicles. Includes light and heavy processing facilities for recycling (see the definitions above). Does not include: places where these activities are conducted entirely within buildings; pawn shops, and other secondhand stores; the sale of operative used cars; or landfills or other waste disposal sites. Religious Facility. Facilities operated by religious organizations for worship, or the promotion of religious activities, including churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, etc.; and accessory uses on the same site, including living quarters for ministers and staff, child day care facilities and religious schools where authorized by the same type of land use permit required for the religious facility itself. May also include fund-raising sales, bazaars, dinners, parties, or other outdoor events on the same site. Other establishments maintained by religious organizations, including full-time educational institutions, hospitals and other related operations, are classified according to their respective activities. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 143 Research and development. “Research and development” means a facility where basic scientific, marketing, or similar types of research are conducted, or where new products or services are designed, or prototypes are produced or tested, excluding retail sales and production-run manufacturing. Rest home. "Rest home" means a residential facility for six or more elderly or infirm persons, all of whom are independently mobile and do not require confinement or regular nursing or medical care on the premises. Rest home differs from a “convalescent hospital” in that it is expected to provide comfort, safety, social participation, and the maintenance of health and activity, but do not provide skilled nursing care for the ill. (Ord. 941 - 1(part), 1982: prior code 9204.11 (part) Ord. 1346 (1999 Series) Residential Care. A single dwelling unit or multiple-unit facility licensed or supervised by any Federal, State, or local health/welfare agency that provides 24-hour non-medical care of unrelated persons who are handicapped and in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual in a family-like environment. Residential Support Services. An establishment with a gross floor area no greater than 3,000 square feet that provides services to residences and residential home offices. Examples of these services include: computer-related services (rental, repair) copying and quick printing services mailing and mail box services Restaurant. A retail business selling ready-to-eat food for on- or off-premise consumption. These include eating establishments where customers are served from a walk-up ordering counter for either on- or off-premise consumption, establishments where most customers are served food at tables for on-premise consumption, but may also provide food for take-out, and establishments that provide food for off-premise consumption only. Includes coffee houses, donut shops, delicatessens, etc. Does not include restaurants with drive-through ordering or service. Riparian Vegetation. “Riparian vegetation" means those herbaceous plants, shrubs, and trees which are naturally associated with stream side environments, and with roots and branches extending in or over a creek channel. (A list of riparian vegetation is available at the Community Development Department.) S. Definitions, "S." School. Public and private educational institutions, including: boarding schools business, secretarial, and vocational schools community colleges, colleges and universities elementary, middle, and junior high schools establishments providing courses by mail high schools military academies professional schools (law, medicine, etc.) City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 144 seminaries/religious ministry training facilities Also includes specialized schools offering instruction in the following: art ballet and other dance computers and electronics drama driver education language music Also includes facilities, institutions and conference centers that offer specialized programs in personal growth and development, such as arts, environmental awareness, communications, and management. Does not include pre-schools and child day care facilities (see "Child Day Care Facilities"). See also the definition of "Studios - Art, Dance, Music, Photography, etc." for smaller-scale facilities offering specialized instruction. Service Station. “Service station” means any business where motor fuel is offered for retail sale, whether or not in conjunction with minor retail uses such as mini markets and similar ancillary uses. “Service station” includes the sale and installation of tires, batteries and automotive accessories; lubrications; and the testing, adjustment and repair of motor parts, brakes, tires and accessories. It also includes accessory sales of fuel oil, butane, propane, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Service station does not include steam cleaning, mechanical car washing, tire recapping, body or chassis repair or painting, which are instead included under “vehicle services;” or the sale, rental or storage of motor vehicles, trailers or other equipment, which are included under “auto and vehicle sales/rental.” Service Station does not include separate retail or other non-related commercial uses on the same property that have independent points of sale separated from the motor fuel point of sale by a distance of at least 250 feet. A point of sale shall be defined as the actual location of the transaction including, but not limited to, a cash register or automated payment station. Setback line. "Setback line" means an officially adopted line determining the extent of a future street or other public right-of-way. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Shopping center. "Shopping center" means a development consisting of at least five separate establishments with a minimum area of 50,000 square feet, a site with a minimum of 300 feet of frontage and shared common drives and off-street parking. (Ord. 1103 - 1 A(2), 1987: Ord. 1008 - 1, 1984) Single-Family Dwelling. A building designed for and/or occupied exclusively by one family. Also includes factory-built, modular housing units, constructed in compliance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and mobile homes/manufactured housing units that comply with the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974, placed on permanent foundations. Social Service Organization. A public or quasi-public establishment providing social and/or rehabilitation services, examples of which include counseling centers, employment agencies, job counseling and training centers, vocational rehabilitation agencies, and welfare offices. These organizations serve the unemployed, persons with social or personal problems, persons requiring special services, the handicapped, or otherwise disadvantaged. City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 145 Includes organizations soliciting funds to be used directly for these and related services, and establishments engaged in community improvement and neighborhood development. Does not include day-care services, homeless shelters, or residential care, which are separately defined. Specific plan. "Specific plan" means a plan for a designated area within the city, based on the general plan, but containing more detailed regulations and programs as provided in Section 65450 and following of the California Government Code. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Sports and Entertainment Assembly. A large-scale indoor or outdoor facility accommodating spectator-oriented sports, concerts, and other entertainment activities. Examples of this land use include amphitheaters, race tracks, stadiums and coliseums. May also include commercial facilities customarily associated with the above uses, including bars and restaurants, gift shops, video game arcades, etc. Sports and Active Recreation Facility. Public and private facilities for various outdoor sports and other types of recreation, where the facilities are oriented more toward participants than spectators. Examples include: athletic/sport fields (e.g., baseball, football, softball, soccer) health and athletic club outdoor facilities skateboard parks swimming pools tennis and other sport courts (e.g., handball, squash) Does not include golf courses, which are separately defined. Storage - Accessory. The storage of materials accessory and incidental to a primary use is not considered a land use separate from the primary use. Storage - Personal Storage Facility. Structures containing generally small, individual, compartmentalized stalls or lockers rented as individual storage spaces and characterized by low parking demand. Storage Yard. The storage of various materials outside of a structure other than fencing, either as an accessory or principal use. Street. "Street" means a public right-of-way providing vehicular access to abutting property. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Structure. "Structure" means anything assembled or constructed on the ground, or attached to anything with a foundation on the ground. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Studio apartment. "Studio apartment" means a one-room dwelling unit with not more than 450 square feet of gross floor area, designed for occupancy by not more than two people. The floor area in a loft is included as part of the gross floor area calculation. (Ord. 1085 - 1 Ex. A (part), 1987: Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Studio - Art, Dance, Martial Arts, Music, etc. Small scale facilities, typically accommodating one group of students at a time, in no more than one instructional space. Larger facilities are included under the definition of "Schools - Specialized education and City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 146 training." Examples of these facilities include: individual and group instruction and training in the arts; production rehearsal; photography, and the processing of photographs produced only by users of the studio facilities; martial arts training studios; gymnastics instruction, and aerobics and gymnastics studios with no other fitness facilities or equipment. T. Definitions, "T." Theater. An indoor facility for public assembly and group entertainment, other than sporting events. Examples of these facilities include: civic theaters, and facilities for "live" theater and concerts movie theaters See also "Public Assembly Facility," and "Sports and Entertainment Assembly." Top of bank. "Top of bank" means the line where the naturally eroded ground slope, or the slope resulting from a creek alteration, flattens to conform with the ground which has not been cut by water flow within the creek channel. If the bank is terraced, the top of bank is the highest step. Truck or Freight Terminal. A transportation facility furnishing services incidental to air, motor freight, and rail transportation. Examples of these facilities include: delivery and courier services freight forwarding services freight terminal facilities joint terminal and service facilities overnight mail processing facilities packing, crating, inspection and weighing services postal service bulk mailing distribution centers transportation arrangement services trucking facilities, including transfer and storage U. Definitions, "U." Use. "Use" means the activity for which land or buildings are designed, occupied or maintained. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) Utility Infrastructure. Pipelines for water, natural gas, and sewage collection and disposal; and facilities for the transmission of electrical energy for sale, including transmission lines for a public utility company. Also includes telephone, telegraph, cable television and other communications transmission facilities utilizing direct physical conduits. Does not include offices or service centers (see "Offices - Business and Service"), or distribution substations (see "Public Utility Facilty"). V. Definitions, "V." City of San Luis Obispo June 2004 Zoning Regulations Page 147 Vehicle Services - Auto Repair and Service. The repair, servicing, alteration, restoration, towing, painting, cleaning (including self-service and attended car washes), or finishing of automobiles, trucks, recreational vehicles, boats and other vehicles as a primary use, including the incidental wholesale and retail sale of vehicle parts as an accessory use. This use includes the following categories. 1. Major Repair/Body Work. Repair facilities dealing with entire vehicles. These establishments provide towing, collision repair, other body work, and painting services; and also include tire recapping establishments. 2. Minor Maintenance/Repair. Minor facilities specialize in limited aspects of repair and maintenance (e.g., muffler and radiator shops, quick-lube, etc.). Does not include automobile parking (see "Parking Facilities"), repair shops that are part of a vehicle dealership on the same site (see "Vehicle Sales/Rental," and "Mobile Home, Recreational Vehicle and Boat Sales and Rental"); gas stations, which are separately defined; or dismantling yards, which are included under "Recycling - Scrap and Dismantling Yards." Veterinary Clinics, Animal Hospitals, Kennels. Office and indoor medical treatment facilities used by veterinarians, including large and small animal veterinary clinics, and animal hospitals. Kennels and boarding operations are commercial facilities for the keeping, boarding or maintaining of four or more dogs four months of age or older, or four or more cats, except for dogs or cats in pet shops. W. Definitions, "W." Warehouse Store. A retail store that emphasizes the packaging and sale of products in large quantities or volumes, some at discounted prices, where products are typically displayed in their original shipping containers. Sites and buildings are usually large and industrial in character. Patrons may be required to pay membership fees. Warehouses, Wholesaling and Distribution. These facilities include: 1. Warehouses. Facilities for the storage of furniture, household goods, or other commercial goods of any nature, including moving company warehouses. Includes cold storage, and moving companies. Does not include: warehouse, storage or mini-storage facilities offered for rent or lease to the general public (see "Storage, Personal Storage Facilities"); warehouse facilities in which the primary purpose of storage is for wholesaling and distribution (see "Wholesaling and Distribution"); or terminal facilities for handling freight (see "Truck and Freight Terminals"). 2. Wholesaling and Distribution. Establishments engaged in selling merchandise to retailers; to contractors, industrial, commercial, institutional, farm, or professional business users; to other wholesalers; or acting as agents or brokers in buying merchandise for or selling merchandise to such persons or companies. Examples of these establishments include: agents, merchandise or commodity brokers, and commission merchants assemblers, buyers and associations engaged in the cooperative marketing of farm products merchant wholesalers stores primarily selling electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning supplies and equipment. City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations June 2004 Page 148 Also includes storage, processing, packaging, and shipping facilities for mail order and e- commerce retail establishments. Work/Live Unit. See "Live/Work Unit, Work/Live Unit." Z. Definitions, "Z." Zone (or district or zone district). "Zone" (or "district" or "zone district") means an area of the city delineated on the official zoning map, designated by name or abbreviation as provided in the regulations codified in this division. (Ord. 941 - 1 (part), 1982: prior code - 9204.11 (part)) 292 From:SLO <noreply@user.govoutreach.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:45 AM To:Debonis, Michael Subject:Ask SLO Notification of new Request #: 12031 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Request # 12031 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Angela Kelley. Request type: Problem Request area: Illegal Parking Citizen name: Description: states that the fraternity members who live at 1271 Stafford Street park their vehicles in Kentucky Alley and block the garbage truck from entering the alley to pick up the garbage. Location: 1271 Stafford St Expected Close Date: June 17, 2025 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 293 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:28 AM To:Sheats, Steven Subject:RE: 280 California No worries! From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:23 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Disregard…John showed me we have access to that info. Sorry! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 8:45 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Looks like they were up to their old ways after their use permit was approved. Can you tell me how many were at the noise violations on 4/16 and 4/18? Thank you, Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 7:47 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California They do. We met with the current tenants and discussed the violations. Then we had a conference call with the property manager/representative and the reps for the fraternity organization. Hopefully they’re quiet for a while…time will tell. 294 Steve From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 4:24 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Nope, crickets. They know they are under review, right? CW From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 3:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Hey there, Just wondering if there’s been any activity at 280 California so far this year. Thanks! Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:31 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 280 California They get citations for trash in their parking lot and pay it within a couple of days, if not the same day. Must just have a ton of money to burn… From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:19:04 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> 295 Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Yep. I think they literally don’t care. From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:14 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 280 California Of course they did. lol Thanks! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:05:57 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Updated citation list for 280 California, they got another one over the weekend. CW From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 12:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California My mistake. John sent me what I needed, sorry. Thank you, Steve From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 12:09 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Hey Wallace, Can you please let me know of the citations issued at 280 California? If we could go as far back as a year that would be great. We are looking to do a use permit review for the fraternity. Thank you, Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer 296 Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 1:55 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: 280 California Hi Steve, 280 California was issued a citation for Unruly Gathering on Friday night. I’ll be citing the property owner later this week as well. Thanks, Christine Wallace Police Public Affairs Manager Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E cwallace@slocity.org T 805.781.7186 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 297 From:Sheats, Steven Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:23 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: 280 California Disregard…John showed me we have access to that info. Sorry! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 8:45 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Looks like they were up to their old ways after their use permit was approved. Can you tell me how many were at the noise violations on 4/16 and 4/18? Thank you, Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 7:47 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California They do. We met with the current tenants and discussed the violations. Then we had a conference call with the property manager/representative and the reps for the fraternity organization. Hopefully they’re quiet for a while…time will tell. Steve From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 4:24 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California 298 Nope, crickets. They know they are under review, right? CW From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 3:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Hey there, Just wondering if there’s been any activity at 280 California so far this year. Thanks! Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:31 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 280 California They get citations for trash in their parking lot and pay it within a couple of days, if not the same day. Must just have a ton of money to burn… From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:19:04 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Yep. I think they literally don’t care. From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:14 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> 299 Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 280 California Of course they did. lol Thanks! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:05:57 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Updated citation list for 280 California, they got another one over the weekend. CW From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 12:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California My mistake. John sent me what I needed, sorry. Thank you, Steve From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 12:09 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Hey Wallace, Can you please let me know of the citations issued at 280 California? If we could go as far back as a year that would be great. We are looking to do a use permit review for the fraternity. Thank you, Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org 300 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 1:55 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: 280 California Hi Steve, 280 California was issued a citation for Unruly Gathering on Friday night. I’ll be citing the property owner later this week as well. Thanks, Christine Wallace Police Public Affairs Manager Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E cwallace@slocity.org T 805.781.7186 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 301 From:Zion, Sarah Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:22 AM To:Matthew Subject:RE: Appeal Hearing Timeline Hi Matthew, Once a valid, complete appeal has been received, our office has 60 days to set a hearing. If the appeal was submitted today, it would be set for early August. Only the hearing officer can grant a continuance, so any request would need to be made to the hearing officer. Additionally, if you choose to not have an in-person hearing, any evidence may be submitted to add to the administrative record. Additional evidence can be submitted at any point in the process until the hearing date. Please let me know if you have additional questions. Thank you, Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Matthew < Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025 12:11 PM To: Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Appeal Hearing Timeline Sarah Zion, 302 Christine Wallace sent me your contact information. I'm the Risk Manager for a Cal Poly fraternity, and we recently received a ticket at our main house that we plan to appeal. Based on past experience, we know this process can be lengthy and will likely extend into summer break, which begins on June 16. Our entire Executive Board, including myself, will be out of SLO for the summer and likely unable to attend an appeal hearing if it's scheduled between June and September. While I know our attendance is not mandatory for the appeal, I feel that our presence gives us the best chance for success. I was wondering if the city might be flexible with the timeline and consider postponing the hearing until school resumes in September. If not, what would you suggest we do? Thank you in advance for your help. Best, Matthew Gnos 303 From:Sheats, Steven Sent:Tuesday, June 3, 2025 8:45 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: 280 California Looks like they were up to their old ways after their use permit was approved. Can you tell me how many were at the noise violations on 4/16 and 4/18? Thank you, Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 7:47 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California They do. We met with the current tenants and discussed the violations. Then we had a conference call with the property manager/representative and the reps for the fraternity organization. Hopefully they’re quiet for a while…time will tell. Steve From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 4:24 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Nope, crickets. They know they are under review, right? CW From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 3:13 PM 304 To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Hey there, Just wondering if there’s been any activity at 280 California so far this year. Thanks! Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:31 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 280 California They get citations for trash in their parking lot and pay it within a couple of days, if not the same day. Must just have a ton of money to burn… From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:19:04 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Yep. I think they literally don’t care. From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:14 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 280 California Of course they did. lol Thanks! 305 From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:05:57 PM To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Updated citation list for 280 California, they got another one over the weekend. CW From: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 12:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California My mistake. John sent me what I needed, sorry. Thank you, Steve From: Sheats, Steven Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 12:09 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 280 California Hey Wallace, Can you please let me know of the citations issued at 280 California? If we could go as far back as a year that would be great. We are looking to do a use permit review for the fraternity. Thank you, Steve Sheats Code Enforcement Officer Interim Code Enforcement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ssheats@slocity.org T 805.783.7841 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 1:55 PM 306 To: Sheats, Steven <ssheats@slocity.org> Subject: 280 California Hi Steve, 280 California was issued a citation for Unruly Gathering on Friday night. I’ll be citing the property owner later this week as well. Thanks, Christine Wallace Police Public Affairs Manager Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E cwallace@slocity.org T 805.781.7186 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 311 From:SLO <noreply@user.govoutreach.com> Sent:Monday, June 2, 2025 3:43 PM To:Salem, Rami Subject:Ask SLO You have been assigned a new Request #: 11991 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Request # 11991 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to you by Harriet Green. Request type: Problem Request area: Land Use Violation Citizen name: Description: Fraternity-sponsored event at this location advertised on Delta Upsilon's Instagram page at this link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJsRg7nSf28/ I have not received an update from previous complaint (Ask SLO New Request # 11882) Location: 1686 Loomis Street To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Expected Close Date: June 1, 2025 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 319 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Monday, June 2, 2025 2:36 PM To:Department Heads Cc:Patino, Mallory; Corey, Tyler; City Communications Subject:KSBY interview regarding Fraternity CUPs BCC:Council_All Hello Team, I wanted to let you know that I just spoke with Dylan Freman of KSBY for an on-camera interview about the CUP revocations for of the two fraternities (Sigma Nu and Delta Chi) last week by Planning Commission. I discussed the following: - What the process is for CUP re-review and why these two permits were up for review - Why the Planning Commission indicated they could not allow these CUPs to remain and directed revocation - The importance of the CUP process in ensuring that we can allow Greek Life, but ensuring that neighborhoods are livable and welcoming for all residents - The importance of fraternities/sororities following our municipal codes and their permit regulations and being good neighbors - I also highlighted the proactive things we are trying to do (education, etc.) to help people comply with regulations - He asked whether the City should address this issue alone and I highlighted that Cal Poly also has a role to play in addressing this issue We have also put together brief talking points about the CUPs here if anyone gets questions: Fraternity Housing Use Permits.docx He indicated that he had spoken with members of the public as well (Brett Cross) who would likely also appear in the story. Please let me know if you have any questions, Thank you, Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org 320 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 321 From:Foreman, Dylan <dylan.foreman@ksby.com> Sent:Monday, June 2, 2025 10:18 AM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:Re: Quick interview for story on Cal Poly fraternity permits That’s perfect. I can do 2 p.m. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 2, 2025, at 10:16 AM, Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> wrote: External sender This message came from outside of our company. If you were not expecting this message, please use caution before clicking any links or opening any attachments. Report Suspicious Hi Dylan, I am available at 2pm for a brief chat. In the meantime, I recommend looking at the staff reports here [pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com]. The reports outline the history of violations at each of the two properties, and the reason that the items were brought before the Commission. Thanks, Timmi From: Foreman, Dylan <dylan.foreman@ksby.com> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2025 9:46 AM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: Quick interview for story on Cal Poly fraternity permits Hi Timmi, Dylan Foreman here with KSBY News. I hope you had a good weekend! I was wondering if you had a few minutes to chat with me today about last week’s Planning Commission meeting and what went into the decision to revoke the permits for the two Cal Poly fraternities and what that means for them going forward? Would be good to talk a little bit about the history of complaints on those two properties and what brough about the discussion and decision last week? Would you have a few minutes for me to stop by your office? 322 Thank you! Dylan Foreman KSBY News Scripps Media, Inc., certifies that its advertising sales agreements do not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity. All advertising sales agreements contain nondiscrimination clauses. Scripps Media, Inc., certifies that its advertising sales agreements do not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity. All advertising sales agreements contain nondiscrimination clauses. 323 From:Foreman, Dylan <dylan.foreman@ksby.com> Sent:Monday, June 2, 2025 9:46 AM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Szentesi, Whit Subject:Quick interview for story on Cal Poly fraternity permits Hi Timmi, Dylan Foreman here with KSBY News. I hope you had a good weekend! I was wondering if you had a few minutes to chat with me today about last week’s Planning Commission meeting and what went into the decision to revoke the permits for the two Cal Poly fraternities and what that means for them going forward? Would be good to talk a little bit about the history of complaints on those two properties and what brough about the discussion and decision last week? Would you have a few minutes for me to stop by your oƯice? Thank you! Dylan Foreman KSBY News Scripps Media, Inc., certifies that its advertising sales agreements do not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity. All advertising sales agreements contain nondiscrimination clauses. 332 From:Matthew < Sent:Sunday, June 1, 2025 12:11 PM To:Zion, Sarah Subject:Appeal Hearing Timeline Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Sarah Zion, Christine Wallace sent me your contact information. I'm the Risk Manager for a Cal Poly fraternity, and we recently received a ticket at our main house that we plan to appeal. Based on past experience, we know this process can be lengthy and will likely extend into summer break, which begins on June 16. Our entire Executive Board, including myself, will be out of SLO for the summer and likely unable to attend an appeal hearing if it's scheduled between June and September. While I know our attendance is not mandatory for the appeal, I feel that our presence gives us the best chance for success. I was wondering if the city might be flexible with the timeline and consider postponing the hearing until school resumes in September. If not, what would you suggest we do? Thank you in advance for your help. Best, Matthew Gnos 12 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 3:49 PM To:Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Attachments:Sept 2024 - June 22 2025.xlsx Hi Chief, Here is some data related to noise complaints in the neighborhoods from September 1 – June 22. The highlighted properties are fraternities, and the columns indicate the total # of calls, total # of citations and total # of DACs. Sometimes more than one DAC is issued to a house when it should be a cite, like shows on 348 Hathway, but it doesn’t happen often. The total number of noise calls for this time period is 1652. Because this tracks the academic year, the total is higher than a calendar year. 227 cites were issued and 319 DACs. Unfortunately, the recidivism with fraternity houses trends significantly higher than non-fraternity houses. The majority of the highlighted properties do have CUPs, or did I should say. Let me know if there’s deeper analysis I can provide prior to the lunch tomorrow. Thanks, CW From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:57 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Ok. No problem. I appreciate whatever we have. Thank you, Rick From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:44 PM To: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Chief, I’m working on this. IT helped run a report, but not all the data was grabbed. I will have info to you no later than Wednesday. Thanks, CW From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM 13 To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Total Calls Total Cites Total DACS Total CIT and DAC combined 9 6 0 6 15 3 2 5 11 5 0 5 10 4 1 5 8 5 0 5 7 5 0 5 6 4 1 5 12 3 1 4 5 3 1 4 7 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 5 3 0 3 5 3 0 3 5 2 1 3 5 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 6 2 0 2 6 2 0 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 0 2 5 2 0 2 5 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 Address 1327 FOOTHILL 348 HATHWAY 1271 STAFFORD 1646 FREDERICKS 231 KENTUCKY 241 HATHWAY 334 FOOTHILL 528 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-07 1236 MONTE VISTA 138 ORANGE 1844 McCOLLUM 284 FOOTHILL 175 HATHWAY 216 ALBERT 571 CUESTA 1555 SLACK 226 PATRICIA 720 FOOTHILL 1688 MILL; GRID L-07 1304 FOOTHILL 1264 FOOTHILL 1541 SLACK 658 GRAVES; GRID L-07 482 LUNETA 814 MEINECKE 1238 FOOTHILL 146 STENNER 496 KENTUCKY 3350 ROCKVIEW 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY; GRID K-06 66 RAFAEL 1229 FREDERICKS 1252 FOOTHILL # 1 1621 MCCOLLUM 385 CHAPLIN 561 ELLEN 1292 FOOTHILL 250 GRAND 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 4 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1793 TONINI 281 HATHWAY 12 HATHWAY 1335 FOOTHILL 529 DARTMOUTH 53 PALOMAR # 202 148 ORANGE 1681 PHILLIPS 2022 FIXLINI 1880 GARFIELD # D 1908 LOOMIS 2069 MCCOLLUM 220 KENTUCKY 322 HATHWAY 1218 BOND 1237 MONTE VISTA # 6; GRID K-06 14 HATHWAY 1820 HOPE 1841 SLACK 145 SOUTH # A28 274 HATHWAY 281 ALBERT 346 GRAND 548 COUPER 589 CUESTA 641 PISMO # 1 350 SAN MIGUEL 363 HENDERSON 377 ALBERT 521 LUNETA 545 COUPER 167 FOOTHILL 183 DEL NORTE 2077 HOPE 251 HIGH # 5 331 KENTUCKY # A; GRID K-06 440 KENTUCKY 1172 MURRAY 1230 FREDERICKS # B; GRID K-06 1230 MONTE VISTA # 200; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 130 FOOTHILL 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 7 0 1 1 7 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 4 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 1185 FOOTHILL # 32 169 CARPENTER; AREA OF; GRID K-06 1254 STAFFORD 1105 LEFF 1116 PEACH 1254 BOND 1350 STAFFORD 1453 SLACK 2034 SWAZEY 2040 SWAZEY 321 BUENA VISTA; GRID L-06 561 LUNETA 895 LINCOLN 227 HIGHLAND 132 CALIFORNIA 1990 HAYS 1267 FREDERICKS 1739 WILSON 2315 JOHNSON 124 STENNER 136 CERRO 299 ALBERT 2090 HAYS 151 STENNER 195 HATHWAY 2 TASSAJARA S 1128 PEACH 1247 MADONNA;AREA OF 1248 STAFFORD 1276 BOND 1435 PHILLIPS # C; GRID K-07 388 CHAPLIN 416 BUENA VISTA 483 KENTUCKY 50 DEL MAR 550 HIGUERA # 2B; GRID J-10 1525 SLACK 167 CERRO 1924 HAYS 313 PATRICIA 359 TOLOSA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 3 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 529 COUPER 1103 TIBURON; GRID N-15 146 STENNER # 1; GRID K-07 1515 OCEANAIRE 1659 CORONA 1677 McCOLLUM 1684 MILL 532 CUESTA 844 UPHAM 940 SANTA ROSA 1039 FOREST; GRID H-14 1311 FREDERICKS 190 STENNER 2074 LOOMIS 2134 SANTA YNEZ 344 HENDERSON 347 HENDERSON 1125 OCEANAIRE 1181 MURRAY; AREA OF GRID K-07 1275 STAFFORD 177 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 189 CARPENTER 3340 JOHNSON 336 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 345 CHAPLIN 360 CHORRO 236 ALBERT 276 RAMONA 278 CERRO ROMAULDO 285 HERMOSA 288 CHORRO 2042 HAYS 2049 SIERRA 2061 HOPE 2099 McCOLLUM 2322 JOHNSON 1690 PHILLIPS 1706 FREDERICKS 1731 SANTA ROSA # A; GRID L-10 1885 GARFIELD 1965 HUASNA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 383 BUENA VISTA 1351 ROYAL # 7; GRID G-14 142 TASSAJARA N 1429 SLACK 146 STENNER # 3; GRID K-07 1464 FOOTHILL 10 MARIPOSA & LAS PRADERAS 104 ORANGE; GRID K-06 1131 OLIVE # 201; GRID K-07 1135 WALNUT 1273 STAFFORD 655 JOHNSON 679 SANTA ROSA 725 GRAND 830 ORCUTT # 103; GRID M-13 836 ORCUTT # 103; GRID M-13 415 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-05 425 LUNETA 465 PACIFIC # A; GRID J-10 563 STANFORD 649 STANFORD 267 HERMOSA 28 CHORRO 281 HATHWAY # 1/2; GRID K-06 286 TASSAJARA N 3057 HIGUERA S # 237 2119 HUTTON 22 CHORRO # 311 227 SANTA LUCIA 253 ALBERT 263 HIGH 1959 McCOLLUM 1990 HOPE 205 ALBERT 2063 HOPE; GRID L-06 2075 HOPE 166 HENDERSON 1800 BLK HOPE; GRID L-06 183 STENNER # 7 1840 HOPE 1877 LIMA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 674 LEFF 696 CHURCH; GRID K-11; GRID K-11 700 GRAND 71 PALOMAR 84 MUSTANG 553 COUPER 600 MARSH 615 GRAND 647 CUESTA 671 PARK 476 SANDERCOCK 49 PALOMAR # 203; GRID I-06 536 COUPER 541 LUNETA 544 PRINCETON 331 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-06 347 LA CANADA 385 CERRO ROMAULDO 410 HENDERSON 416 HATHWAY 1139 WALNUT # B; GRID K-08 114 BRESSI 1144 WALNUT # 10; GRID K-08 1156 PEACH 1167 ATASCADERO 111 ORANGE 1127 FOOTHILL # 107 1131 WALNUT 1133 PALM 1134 MONTALBAN # 1; GRID J-07 1043 SOUTHWOOD # I; GRID M-12 1050 FOOTHILL # 6C; GRID J-05 107 HIGHLAND 108 CRANDALL 1085 CORTEZ 860 MURRAY 1012 SAN ADRIANO 1026 GEORGE 1031 SOUTHWOOD # E; GRID M-12 1035 OAK 119 FOOTHILL 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1262 MURRAY # 5; GRID K-07 1275 STAFFORD # A; GRID K-07 1275 STAFFORD # B; GRID K-07 1280 FREDERICKS 1281 BRIARWOOD 1230 MURRAY # 7; GRID K-07 1234 STAFFORD 1239 FOOTHILL # 107; GRID K-06 1252 FOOTHILL # 9; GRID K-06; AREA OF; GRID K-06 1262 MURRAY # 18 1213 CORAL 1214 MARINERS 1217 MILL 1227 CORAL 1227 STAFFORD 1191 ATASCADERO 120 DEL SUR 1206 GALLEON # B; GRID G-13 121 TWIN RIDGE; GRID H-03 1435 SOUTHWOOD 1439 PHILLIPS 1445 PREFUMO CANYON # 12; GRID F-13 1454 QUARRY; GRID N-14 146 STENNER # 5; GRID K-07 1367 MILL 1383 AVALON 1391 SAN MARCOS 1394 SOUTHWOOD 1405 SLACK 133 ORANGE 1330 SOUTHWOOD # 17; ACCESS NEXT TO 1352, GRID N-13 1345 STAFFORD 1348 PEACH 1367 HIGUERA 131 HATHWAY 1314 FOOTHILL # D; GRID K-06 1317 FOOTHILL # C; GRID K-06 1320 FOOTHILL # C2; GRID K-05 1324 CAVALIER 1464 GULF 1472 GARCIA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1702 DEVAUL 1703 SANTA BARBARA; ESTABLISHMENT APTS; GRID K-10 1710 HUASNA 172 HIGHLAND 1720 DIABLO 1658 MILL # 2; GRID L-07 168 BUENA VISTA 169 FERRINI 1690 WILSON; GRID L-07 1698 WILSON 1558 CUCARACHA 1591 MILL 1634 MILL # 8 1636 OCEANAIRE 1658 MILL # 1; GRID L-07 1510 BROAD 1512 HIGUERA; GRID L-08 1538 BALBOA 215 ALBERT 2155 SANTA YNEZ 223 ROSITA 225 LA CANADA; AREA OF 225 RAMONA 189 DEL NORTE 1944 McCOLLUM 2045 SLACK 2050 HOPE 2052 JOHNSON 177 CERRO ROMAULDO 1853 PINECOVE 1857 HOMESTEAD; GRID H-14 1861 HOPE 1877 OCEANAIRE 1720 FREDERICKS 1720 LA LUNA 1731 SANTA ROSA # B; GRID L-10 1750 PREFUMO CANYON # 67 176 KENTUCKY 228 CHORRO N # 20; GRID J-06 228 CUESTA 233 CATALINA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 263 CHORRO N # 14; GRID I-06; GRID I-06 265 ALBERT 269 CERRO ROMAULDO 276 GRAVES 278 ALBERT 248 HATHWAY 2527 BROAD 258 CALIFORNIA # C3; GRID K-06 258 CHORRO 258 WARREN 237 CATALINA 2387 BOULEVARD DEL CAMPO 2457 SENDERO 248 CHAPLIN 248 GRAND; GRID L-06 234 TASSAJARA N 235 FOOTHILL 3180 CALLE JAZMIN 34 RAFAEL; GRID I-06 342 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 347 JEFFREY 355 CHORRO N # B 311 DEL MAR 312 LUNETA 313 FOOTHILL 316 LEROY 316 RAMONA 3003 ROCKVIEW # 5; GRID L-13 3003 ROCKVIEW # 6; GRID L-13 302 BUENA VISTA 304 LONGVIEW 305 SANTA LUCIA 2869 JOHNSON; GRID M-12 289 RAMONA 293 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 296 RAMONA 300 LONGVIEW 3550 RANCH HOUSE # 207; GRID N-14 3591 SACRAMENTO # 6; GRID M-15 361 LA CANADA 362 HATHWAY 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 458 KENTUCKY 464 BROAD 49 PALOMAR # 104; GRID I-06 492 FELTON 521 HATHWAY 399 JEFFREY 415 CHORRO N # 10 440 PACIFIC # D; GRID J-10; GRID J-10 446 HATHWAY 451 CHORRO N 366 SAN MIGUEL 379 ALBERT; GRID L-06 380 CHRISTINA 385 ALBERT 3860 HIGUERA S # 240; GRID I-16 364 HATHWAY 66 RAFAEL # 1/2; GRID I-06 67 PALOMAR # 215; GRID I-07 677 CAUDILL # 1/2; GRID L-12 677 MORRO # 3; GRID J-08 678 TORO 607 GRAND # 11; GRID L-07 626 BROAD # 11; GRID J-08 631 JOHNSON # A; GRID K-07 641 SERRANO 645 FUNSTON 570 PEACH # 35; GRID J-09 572 FOOTHILL # 4; BEHIND;GRID I-06 577 PRINCETON 590 FELTON 607 GRAND # 10 526 KENTUCKY # 2; GRID K-07 551 HIGHLAND 555 RAMONA # 14; GRID I-06 561 COUPER 562 SOUTH 7 ELM 70 MUSTANG; GRID J-06 700 GRAND & MILL 710 CALIFORNIA 730 BOYSEN # 4 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 830 BOYSEN # 16; GRID J-06 841 BOYSEN # 35; GRID J-06 892 GROVE 9 VERDE 905 MADONNA # 65; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 785 SERRANO 8 ELM 805 BOYSEN # 19 810 GROVE 813 MEINECKE 732 FOOTHILL 74 BROAD 741 PASATIEMPO 758 GROVE 781 MARSH # 240; GRID K-09 1205 FOOTHILL & CARPENTER 1229 PEACH # E; GRID K-08 1334 PALM # 8; GRID K-08 2240 EMILY # 202 3419 ROBERTO # C; SLO CIDER CO; AREA OF; GRID M-14 1229 PEACH 136 STENNER 1750 BISHOP # 107; GRID M-10 468 LEFF # B 1100 GARDEN & HIGUERA 801 GRAND 1234 BROAD 2038 CHORRO # 3 3722 BROAD # 108; GRID M-15 93 FOOTHILL 132 STENNER 673 HIGUERA 3000 AUGUSTA 3055 DUNCAN # D; SHINDIG CIDER 152 CUESTA 845 MADONNA; GRID H-14 1114 ORCUTT 1150 CORAL & NEWPORT 1315 FOOTHILL 145 SOUTH # A54 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 550 HIGUERA 607 GRAND 611 MOUNTAIN VIEW 654 GRAVES; AREA OF; GRID L-07 777 MILL # 3; GRID J-09 1700 OSOS 234 FERRINI 241 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 2505 AUGUSTA 2741 MCMILLAN 1530 CALLE JOAQUIN 1625 CALLE JOAQUIN 1650 CRESTVIEW 1693 WILSON & PARK 1556 GULF 1578 MADONNA # 81; ABOVE; GRID F-14 1578 MADONNA # 85 1587 ETO 1593 SOUTHWOOD & FLORA 1155 MURRAY 1198 OCEANAIRE 1321 JOHNSON 1329 ALDER 1512 MORRO 1050 ORCUTT 108 CRANDALL & FOOTHILL 1125 GARDEN 1128 OLIVE 1140 MONTALBAN HATHWAY ALLEY; AREA OF; GRID K-06 ' YTP; GRID K-10 1 MUSTANG 1000 LEFF & OSOS 1011 RAILROAD 1724 FARRIER 185 BROAD 1615 PHILLIPS 1671 MILL & PARK 1690 HILLCREST & PARK 1705 FARRIER 1721 NIPOMO & CHURCH 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2295 JOHNSON 260 CRAIG 265 CHORRO N 2755 AUGUSTA; IFO SINSHEIMER SCHOOL; GRID M-12 279 HERMOSA 2034 SANTA BARBARA 216 CHORRO 2160 BROAD & SOUTH 2240 FLORA 2280 EMILY # 302 187 TANGO; AREA OF; GRID I-18 1901 BROAD 2028 KING 399 JAYCEE 411 HENDERSON 446 HIGHLAND & CUESTA 50 CHORRO 532 DANA 3650 HIGUERA S 3684 BROAD # 211 370 ISLAY 375 HILL & MOUNTAIN VIEW 3960 HIGUERA S # 197; GRID I-16 3388 BROAD & ROCKVIEW 345 BUENA VISTA 3520 RANCH HOUSE # 209 3550 RANCH HOUSE; GRID N-14 359 GRAVES; GRID L-06 284 LA CANADA 315 CERRO ROMAULDO 3180 BROAD & ORCUTT 323 CERRO ROMAULDO 333 ELKS # 18 675 CLARION; GRID 674 B 2 699 CHORRO & PEACH 744 FOOTHILL 54 BROAD 544 PACIFIC # 104 555 RAMONA 636 CUESTA 67 CHORRO 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 100 BLK FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 100 VENTURE & VACHELL 1000 BLK TIBURON; GRID N-15 1000 JOHNSON & MONTEREY 1001 WILLOW & BULLOCK BROAD & MONTEREY; GRID J-09 BULLOCK & TIBURON; GRID N-15 LA ENTRADA & RAMONA; GRID H-06 10 BROAD & FOOTHILL 10 DEL MAR & RAMONA 85 STENNER # C 875 HUMBERT 1041 SOUTHWOOD # D 1042 PALM 1050 FOOTHILL # 13F 1050 FOOTHILL # 1R; GRID J-06 106 SANTA ROSA 1029 SOUTHWOOD # O; GRID M-12 1034 YARROW 1035 SAN ADRIANO 1035 SOUTHWOOD # F; GRID M-12 1040 FOOTHILL; 284 STENNER GLEN 1020 LEFF & SANTA ROSA 1026 MILL 1028 CHURCH 1029 SOUTHWOOD 1029 SOUTHWOOD # M; GRID M-12 101 GRAVES 101 GRAVES & SLACK 1010 NIPOMO & DANA 1012 CORTEZ & PREFUMO CANYON 1012 SAN ADRIANO & PREFUMO CANYON 1092 ORCUTT # 8; BELOW; GRID M-13 1095 ORCUTT 11 LA ENTRADA & DEL NORTE 1100 ATASCADERO 1062 ISLAY # B; GRID K-10 107 FOOTHILL 1070 PALM & SANTA ROSA 1080 MORRO & HIGUERA 109 CERRO ROMAULDO 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11245 LOS OSOS VALLEY 1126 WISTERIA 1127 BROAD 1127 FOOTHILL # 109; AREA;GRID J-06 1127 FOOTHILL # 204 1101 MADONNA & LOS OSOS VALLEY 111 MUSTANG BLDG; AREA OF; GRID J-05 1111 HIGUERA; AREA OF; DOZUKI; GRID K-09 1114 ORCUTT # D; GRID M-13 1114 ORCUTT # E; GRID M-13 1100 BLK OSOS; GRID K-09 1200 SYDNEY & HELENA 1206 MURRAY 1208 CORAL 1209 FREDERICKS & HATHWAY 1212 DRAKE 1185 PACIFIC 1192 LEFF 1199 FOOTHILL & CALIFORNIA 1200 OCEANAIRE 1200 OCEANAIRE # B 1144 WALNUT & TORO 1148 FERNWOOD # 2; GRID M-13 1160 LAUREL 1183 MURRAY 1185 FOOTHILL # 6 1128 IRIS 1131 OLIVE # 302 11321 LOS OSOS VALLEY # K 1134 MONTALBAN; AREA OF;GRID J-07 1144 ORCUTT # A 1226 STAFFORD 123 CASA 1232 CORAL 1234 ELLA & BINNS 1239 BOND # D 1212 FREDERICKS 1212 GARDEN 1215 FOOTHILL; AREA OF;GRID K-06 1220 FREDERICKS 1220 SPONZA # 6; GRID N-14 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1260 FREDERICKS # B; GRID K-06 1264 MILL & JOHNSON 1266 MONTEREY & JOHNSON 1274 STAFFORD 1276 BOND & KENTUCKY 1239 FOOTHILL 1241 BEACH & PACIFIC 1250 STAFFORD 1255 ORCUTT # A11 1260 CHORRO & PACIFIC 1334 GALLEON 1334 PALM # 5; POSS 1335 ELLA 1335 ELLA # 9; GRID L-10 1337 PHILLIPS # A; GRID K-08 132 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 1323 BALBOA 1328 MADONNA; AREA LAGUNA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER; 1330 GARCIA & VICENTE 1330 SOUTHWOOD 1300 BLK FOOTHILL; GRID K-06; GRID K-05 1301 FOOTHILL # C; GRID K-06 131 GRAVES 1311 FOOTHILL 1313 MILL & PEPPER 1290 FOOTHILL 1292 SAN MATEO 1293 FREDERICKS & KENTUCKY 1293 SYDNEY & AUGUSTA 1296 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 1364 FOOTHILL; GRID K-05 1352 SOUTHWOOD 1358 MADONNA 1360 LAUREL # 9; GRID N-12 1360 SONRISA 1363 PISMO 1340 FREDERICKS 1340 SAWLEAF 1341 PHILLIPS 135 CRANDALL 1350 FOOTHILL; AREA OF; GRID K-05 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 140 FERRINI # 16 1400 BLK SLACK; GRID K-06 1400 FOOTHILL; GRID K-05 1400 OSOS 1400 SLACK & LONGVIEW 1366 SOUTHWOOD 137 TWIN RIDGE 1375 BALBOA 1375 PACIFIC 149 CARPENTER 1496 ORCUTT & JOHNSON 1500 BLK EL TIGRE; GRID G-14 151 FOOTHILL 1515 ETO 146 STENNER # 2; GRID K-07 1468 FOOTHILL 147 RAMONA 1472 FOOTHILL 1475 SLACK 1441 SLACK 1448 LIZZIE & FIXLINI 145 SOUTH # A29; GRID J-12 145 SOUTH # A62 ;POSS ADDRESS 1458 PREFUMO CANYON 1422 SOUTHWOOD # A 1425 GARDEN 1427 MORRO 143 CERRO 1437 BEACH & BUCHON ; ON BEACH 1552 EL TIGRE 1552 EL TIGRE # 7 1535 NEWPORT 1542 NEWPORT 1545 LAUREL; GRID N-12 1545 OCEANAIRE 1547 BEACH & ISLAY 1515 PALM 1519 ROYAL 1520 MORRO 1526 MILL 1526 OSOS 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1575 LIZZIE & WILDING 1575 MONTEREY; #14; LOS PADRES INN; GRID L-08 1581 EL TIGRE 1585 CALLE JOAQUIN 159 ORANGE 1560 PHILLIPS & GROVE 1561 HILLCREST & GROVE 1572 MADONNA # 59 ;APT ABOVE 1663 PHILLIPS 1690 HILLCREST 1690 PHILLIPS & PARK 170 BROOK; ETO PARK; GRID I-12 1700 BLK DEVAUL; GRID F-15 1616 FREDERICKS 1620 BISHOP; AREA OF; GRID M-10 163 LONGVIEW 165 GRAND & HAYS 1661 MCCOLLUM 160 HIGHLAND 1605 CALLE JOAQUIN 161 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 1614 SYDNEY; GRID M-11 1615 MORRO 159 STENNER # 4 1591 MILL & GROVE 1592 MADONNA 1592 PALM & GROVE 16 MUSTANG 1750 BISHOP; #104; GRID M-10 1759 SAN LUIS 1760 FREDERICKS 1730 BISHOP 1731 SANTA ROSA 1739 WILSON & GRAND 174 CERRO ROMAULDO & PATRICIA 175 CRANDALL 1700 BLK PORTOLA; GRID E-13 1704 OCEANAIRE 171 ORANGE 1716 SINGLE TREE 1720 TONINI # 104 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1784 FARRIER 1789 SANTA BARBARA & CHURCH 1792 CONEJO & ANDREWS 1797 TANGLEWOOD 1810 HOPE & GRAND 1775 OCEANAIRE 1778 TONINI 1900 FIXLINI 1908 CHORRO; AREA OF GRID K-11 195 TANGO; GRID I-19; GRID I-18 1962 HOPE 1965 HOPE 1890 HOPE & GRAVES 1890 McCOLLUM & GRAVES 190 DEL NORTE; GRID H-06 190 SANTA ROSA 1900 BLK CHORRO; GRID K-11 1866 LOOMIS 1880 GARFIELD 1880 GARFIELD # A; GRID L-07 1880 GARFIELD & GRAND 1890 HAYS & GRAVES 1843 HAYS; GRID L-06 1845 MONTEREY 1850 CHORRO & UPHAM; BLK OF 186 RAMONA 1861 WILDING 2033 SWAZEY 2038 CHORRO # 2; GRID K-11 205 ALBERT & LONGVIEW 205 CRAIG 1991 HAYS 20 HATHWAY 200 SANTA ROSA N # 305;BELOW; GRID J-06 200 SANTA ROSA N # 604; GRI; MUSTANG VILLAGE II, GRID J-06 200 SANTA ROSA N; #107; MUSTANG VILLAGE II; GRID J-06 1968 CHORRO 1968 CHORRO # A 1977 SANTA BARBARA 199 BUENA VISTA & SAN MIGUEL 199 DEL NORTE 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2060 PARKER 21 ZACA # 120; INLINE WAREHOUSE, GRID I-15 210 MADONNA 210 MARGARITA # 14 210 SANTA LUCIA & CERRO ROMAULDO 2053 HAYS 2260 LOOMIS & SANTA YNEZ 228 BROAD 228 LOS CERROS 2309 JOHNSON 2318 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 220 CALIFORNIA 220 CALIFORNIA # C; GRID K-06 2220 EXPOSITION & SOUTH 225 CHORRO; GRID J-07 2260 LOOMIS 2138 KING 2140 LOOMIS 2149 SANTA YNEZ 22 101 SOUTHBOUND & BUENA VISTA 22 CHORRO 2106 SANTA YNEZ & BUENA VISTA 2110 BROAD 2121 BROAD 2125 SIERRA 2125 STORY 2478 VICTORIA; BEHIND NEAR RR TRACKS; GRID L-12 2505 JOHNSON 252 SANDERCOCK 259 WARREN 261 CUESTA 2410 HELENA 244 CALIFORNIA 245 FOOTHILL 2459 AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 246 CHORRO 2324 MADRID 2333 MEADOW 236 SANTA LUCIA 237 FOOTHILL 2400 BLK AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 263 BRIDGE; GRID J-12 2741 MCMILLAN # B; ABRAHAM STEEL 276 HERMOSA 279 BRANCH 284 HERMOSA 307 FOOTHILL 3075 HIGUERA S # 300 31 RAFAEL & RAMONA 310 GRAVES 310 SANTA LUCIA; GRID H-05 300 BLK TASSAJARA N; GRID I-05 301 HATHWAY 301 SANTA MARIA 304 LA CANADA 3051 AUGUSTA 2994 HIGUERA S # 13 300 BLK CHORRO; GRID J-08 300 BLK CUESTA; GRID I-05 300 BLK GRAND; GRID L-06 300 BLK PATRICIA; GRID H-06; GRID H-05 286 CHAPLIN 2880 BROAD 289 FOOTHILL 2932 AUGUSTA 2935 JOHNSON 323 MADONNA; GRID H-13 319 RAMONA 3195 ESTELITA 320 GRAND 321 CUESTA 3226 VIA ENSENADA 3150 ROCKVIEW 3151 CALLE MALVA & CALLE LUPITA 3165 BROAD # 102; COOL CAT CAFE; GRID L-13 3172 JOHNSON; ACTIVE CHURCH, GRID N-12; GRID N-12 319 HIGHLAND 311 GRAND 311 LONGVIEW # C; GRID K-06 3110 DUNCAN; AREA OF;GRID M-13 3125 ESTELITA # C; GRID J-14 313 SAN MIGUEL 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 324 BUENA VISTA 324 CERRO ROMAULDO 326 CHRISTINA 3280 LAVENDER; AREA OF; GRID M-14 348 TOLOSA & LA CANADA 349 TASSAJARA N # A 352 FOOTHILL 3520 RANCH HOUSE # 207; GRID N-13 3530 RANCH HOUSE; 105; GRID N-14 344 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 3443 MIGUELITO & VIA ESTEBAN 3448 EDGEWOOD & TANGLEWOOD 346 HATHWAY; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 348 TASSAJARA N 338 CUESTA & FELTON 3380 BULLOCK 3395 HIGUERA S # 22; GRID J-15 3395 HIGUERA S # 65; GRID J-15 3396 JOHNSON 333 ELKS # 19; AREA OF; GRID I-13 333 ELKS # 8; GRID I-13 333 LUNETA & TASSAJARA S 333 MADONNA RD; EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL; GRID H-13 334 LA CANADA 3900 BROAD ST; BEHIND VONS; GRID M-16 391 MONTROSE; BLK OF 376 GRAVES 3770 ORCUTT & TIBURON 383 MARGARITA 3860 HIGUERA S # CS6; GRID I-16; GRID I-16 389 JEFFREY 367 CERRO ROMAULDO 3684 BROAD; ACROSS FROM; GRID M-15 369 BRANCH 370 KENTUCKY 3720 BROAD # 202 355 SANDERCOCK 3570 RANCH HOUSE # 203 359 CERRO ROMAULDO 359 HILL; GRID J-08 3591 SACRAMENTO 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 395 CHORRO N & BOYSEN 396 LINCOLN & MOUNTAIN VIEW 3960 HIGUERA S # 214; GRID I-16 431 CHORRO & LINCOLN 434 HATHWAY 447 CHORRO N 456 HIGH; GRID K-11 462 PISMO 415 CHORRO N 415 CHORRO N # 4; GRID I-05 415 DANA 42 VERDE 424 HATHWAY 400 BLK PACIFIC; GRID J-10 400 BLK SANDERCOCK; GRID K-11 403 BRANCH 410 CHORRO 410 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-05 398 FERRINI & FELTON 398 SAN MIGUEL 40 CHORRO & MEINECKE 400 BLK DANA; GRID J-10 400 BLK FERRINI; GRID I-05; GRID I-05 524 FELTON 526 OAKRIDGE 528 HATHWAY # D; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 510 STANFORD 513 JEFFREY 514 PATRICIA 516 MITCHELL 516 STONERIDGE 500 BLK HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 500 HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 ; BLK OF 501 KENTUCKY 505 BRIZZOLARA 508 HATHWAY 467 BRANCH 468 LEFF; GRID J-11 481 ISLAY 490 LUNETA & VERDE 500 BLK CUESTA; GRID I-05 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 534 HATHWAY 536 ELLEN 599 COUPER # 3; BEHIND 60 BROAD # A 60 CASA # E23; GRID J-06 600 BLK COUPER; GRID I-04; GRID I-05 600 BLK PATRICIA; GRID H-04; GRID H-05 572 FOOTHILL # 17; GRID I-06 575 STANFORD 578 BUCHON 588 STANFORD; GRID I-05 593 LUNETA 555 RAMONA # 40; GRID I-06 555 WESTMONT # 213; GRID I-04 559 MARSH 567 HATHWAY 570 HIGUERA 536 HATHWAY 545 BRIZZOLARA 546 LEFF 550 FOOTHILL 550 HIGUERA # 6A; GRID J-10; GRID J-10 680 CHORRO # 5 688 MORRO & PEACH 699 MONTEREY; 600 BLK 700 BLK TORO; GRID K-08 655 TORO 656 TORO 670 CHORRO # C; GRID J-08 672 HIGUERA # 200; THE CENTER YOGA STUDIO, GRID J-09 680 CHORRO # 1 627 BROAD; GRID J-09 639 PISMO 646 STANFORD 650 SWEENEY 653 STANFORD 603 FELTON; GRID I-05 603 JOHNSON # 15; GRID K-07 603 LUNETA 620 CALIFORNIA # G; COASTAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY 624 GROVE 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 700 BLK WOODBRIDGE; GRID L-12 800 BLK HUMBERT; GRID L-12; GRID L-12 816 COLUMBINE 825 MADONNA; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-13; GRID H-14 83 STENNER; GRID K-06 830 BOYSEN # 5; GRID J-06 777 WOODBRIDGE ; PACIFIC BUILDERS 785 MORRO # C; GRID J-09 79 CHUPARROSA 790 FOOTHILL # 218; GRID J-06 799 ORCUTT; AREA OF; GRID M-14 741 PATRICIA 745 MILL; GRID J-09 747 LEFF 750 CHORRO # 3 77 HIGHLAND 717 GRAND 721 JOHNSON # 14 722 BOYSEN # 4; GRID I-05 722 BOYSEN # 5; GRID I-05 740 FOOTHILL 894 LINCOLN 895 MADONNA; GRID H-14 905 MADONNA # 69; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 905 MADONNA # 72; SAN LUIS RANCH 905 MADONNA # 78; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-14 866 LEFF # D; GRID K-10 87 FOOTHILL 880 ALYSSUM; AREA OF GRID N-16 887 NIPOMO 890 PISMO # B; GRID K-10 851 HIGUERA 854 PISMO 855 AEROVISTA; GRID M-18 860 BOYSEN 860 BOYSEN # 5; GRID J-06 830 BOYSEN # 9; GRID J-06 830 RICARDO 836 PACIFIC 842 TARRAGON 849 HIGUERA # 231; GRID K-09 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 ZACA KENTUCKY LEGACY; GRID H-14 RR TRACKS AT END OF TORO AND LEFF; GRID L-09 RTA GOVERNMENT CENTER PALM AND OSOS; GRID K-09 SANDERCOCK 980 TARRAGON; AREA OF ; GRID M-14 990 PALM ALPHONSO & EMILY; GRID L-12 FOREST & TERRA; GRID H-14; HOPE 948 BAY LEAF; AREA OF; GRID M-14 955 MONTEREY 962 MONTEREY 969 TORO 973 GOLDENROD 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM 14 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 2:52 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Patino, Mallory; Corey, Tyler Subject:06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Vujovich-LaBarre Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 15 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 2:48 PM To:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Planning Commission 6.25.25 - Item 4a Hi Mila, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for tonight’s meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre < Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:34 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission 6.25.25 - Item 4a Date: June 25, 2025 To: Advisory Bodies Subject: Planning Commission, Item 4a Dear Chairman Houghton and Planning Commissioners, By way of introduction, my name is Mila Vujovich-La Barre. In addition to being a resident of the “Neighborhoods North of Foothill" and a teacher in the San Luis Coastal Unified School District for the last 41 years, I am also a member of the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC). One of the major goals of the SCLC is to constantly enhance “town-gown” relationships. Over the last few years, the melding of college students in residential neighborhoods has been a common topic. Several students do an outstanding job of thriving and embracing their neighborhoods and our community as a whole. The members of the Delta Upsilon Fraternity have quite simply failed to demonstrate this concept. 16 After due consideration and review, it is my hope that you revoke Delta Upsilon’s Conditional Use Permit based on continual noise complaints and citations, and the fact that they have not followed the conditions of their Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The site of their fraternity has been the cause for innumerable noise complaints, which have involved our hardworking police force. Delta Upsilon members have displayed a lack of respect for city residents by continuing to host noisy events with excessive numbers of attendees at their main and satellite houses, despite being given multiple verbal and written warnings, noise citations, and notices of violation. Many students who are accepted into California Polytechnic University (Cal Poly) are indeed among the top scholars in the country. This leads me to believe that the Delta Upsilon members are fully capable of understanding the laws and are simply choosing to ignore them. As a classroom teacher, I have recently had to deal with this sense of entitlement daily with my middle school students. Until Delta Upsilon members show the respect due to others, I hope that you revoke their Conditional Use Permit. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre