HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRR26352 Hochstetter - Records relating to SLOPD Incident #240710069
From:
AM
To:CityClerk
Subject:Re: cpra request see attached form
This is a clarification and supplemental description of my prior CPRA
request regarding SLOPD Incident No. 240710069 and CHP Incident No.
240710SLO110. My earlier wording may not have completely described the
specific administrative, equipment-assignment, retention, audit-log, and
metadata records I am seeking. I am not asking the City to create a new
record or answer interrogatories; I am requesting existing records that
identify the recording equipment, recordings, retention status,
deletion/purge status, and metadata connected to the responding officers
and vehicles.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST
Pursuant to the California Public Records Act, I request the following
records relating to SLOPD Incident No. 240710069 and CHP Incident No.
240710SLO110.
Please produce records identifying the digital evidence associated with
the responding officers and patrol vehicles, including:
1. Records identifying which of the following officers were assigned
body-worn cameras on July 10, 2024:
o Natalie Mangskau (#98752)
o Matthew Perlette (#68370)
o Blake Etherton (#33665)
o Hayden Warner (#90046)
o Robert Kuhn (#99747)
o Evan Stradley (#83849)
o Brent Inglehart (#49251)
2. Records identifying the patrol vehicle assigned to each responding
officer.
3. Records identifying whether each responding patrol vehicle was
equipped with:
o a dash camera;
o a rear-seat or prisoner-compartment camera; or
o any other digital recording system.
4. Any body-worn camera assignment logs, equipment checkout records,
Axon Evidence assignment records, fleet equipment inventories, or
similar administrative records identifying the recording equipment
assigned to each responding officer.
1
5. Any records identifying whether recordings were created by any body-
worn camera, dash camera, rear-seat camera, or other recording system
during Incident No. 240710069.
6. Any records identifying the retention schedule, retention period,
deletion date, purge date, overwrite date, or destruction date
applicable to each recording.
7. Any audit logs, deletion logs, retention logs, Evidence.com records,
Axon audit records, or similar records reflecting whether any
recordings were deleted, purged, overwritten, or otherwise became
unavailable.
8. Any records identifying the evidence or property tracking systems
used by SLOPD for digital recordings associated with Incident No.
240710069.
9. Any metadata associated with responsive digital recordings, including
creation dates, upload dates, deletion dates, retention settings, and
chain-of-custody information, to the extent maintained by the City.
“Some birds are not meant to be caged, that's all. Their feathers are too bright, their songs too
sweet and wild.”
Defender of Ants
5419 Hollywood Blvd Ste C 137
Los Angeles California 90027
Theloreofdoa@gmail.com
On Saturday, July 4, 2026 at 10:50:22 AM PDT, theloreofdoa@gmail.com <theloreofdoa@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for identifying the responding officers:
Natalie Mangskau (#98752)
Matthew Perlette (#68370)
Blake Etherton (#33665)
Hayden Warner (#90046)
Robert Kuhn (#99747)
Evan Stradley (#83849)
Brent Inglehart (#49251)
Please produce any records identifying the recording equipment
assigned to these officers and their patrol vehicles during
Incident No. 240710069, including:
1. Which of these officers were assigned body-worn cameras on
July 10, 2024;
2. Which responding patrol vehicles were equipped with dash
cameras;
2
3. Which responding patrol vehicles were equipped with rear-
seat or prisoner-compartment cameras;
4. Whether each recording system was activated during the
incident;
5. Whether recordings were created;
6. The retention period applicable to each recording;
7. Whether any recordings were deleted, overwritten, or
otherwise became unavailable, and if so, any records
documenting the date, reason, and authorization for such
deletion or destruction.
This asks for existing records identifying the equipment and recordings,
rather than asking the City to answer questions. It is more squarely
within the scope of the CPRA and avoids the response you received
previously that the Act "does not separately require the City to provide
information."
“Some birds are not meant to be caged, that's all. Their feathers are too bright, their songs too
sweet and wild.”
Defender of Ants
5419 Hollywood Blvd Ste C 137
Los Angeles California 90027
Theloreofdoa@gmail.com
3